HomeMy Public PortalAboutAgreement_2013-08-20_GPA Consulting, Inc_Creation of Historic Preservation OrdinanceCONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT
Environmental Services
By and Between
THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY,
a municipal corporation
and
GPA Consulting, Inc.
RN #4822-7830-4520 v]
-1-
AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
AND
GPA CONSULTING, INC.
This Agreement for Consultant Services ("Agreement") is entered into as of this 20th day
of August, 2013 by and between the City of TEMPLE CITY, a municipal corporation ("City")
and GPA Consulting, Inc., a GPA Consulting, Inc ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are
sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as "Party" and hereinafter collectively referred to
as the "Parties."
RECITALS
A. City has sought, by a Request For Proposal (RFP), the performance of the
Creation of an Historic Preservation Ordinance defined and described particularly in Section 2
of this Agreement.
B. Consultant, following submission of a Proposal for the performance of the
services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement, was selected by the
City to perform those services.
C. Consultant was selected by the City on the basis of Consultant's demonstrated
competence and the professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the
services required.
D. Pursuant to the City of Temple City's Municipal Code, City has authority to enter
into this Consultant Services Agreement and the City Manager has authority to execute this
Agreement.
E. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of
those services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement and desire that
the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by
the Parties and contained here and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
SECTION 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT.
Subject to the provisions of Section 20 "Termination of Agreement" of this Agreement,
the scope of services set forth in Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services" shall be completed pursuant to
the schedule specified in Exhibit "A." Should the scope of services not be completed pursuant to
that schedule, the Consultant shall be deemed to be in Default of this Agreement pursuant to
Section 21 of this Agreement. The City, in its sole discretion, may choose not to enforce the
RN #4822-7830-4520 v l _ 1 _
Default provisions of this Agreement and may instead allow Consultant to continue performing
the scope of services until such services are complete.
SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES.
Consultant agrees to perform the seryices set forth in Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services,"
which is incorporated herein by this reference, in accordance with the terms and conditions of
this Agreement.
SECTION 3. ADDITIONAL SERVICES.
Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its
performance of this Agreement which are in addition to or outside of those set forth in this
Agreement or listed in Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services," unless such additional services are
authorized in advance and in writing by the City Council or City Manager of City. Consultant
shall be compensated for any such additional services in the amounts and in the manner agreed to
by the City Council or City Manager.
SECTION 4. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.
(a) Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay
Consultant the amounts specified in Exhibit "B" "Compensation," which is incorporated herein
by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall
not exceed Thirty thousand dollars ($30,000.00), unless additional compensation is approved in
writing by the City Council or City Manager.
(b) Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work
performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. The invoice shall detail charges
by the following categories: labor (by sub -category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and
sub -consultant contracts. Sub -consultant charges shall be detailed by the following categories:
labor, travel, materials, equipment and supplies. If the compensation set forth in subsection (a)
and Exhibit "B" include payment of labor on an hourly basis (as opposed to labor and materials
being paid as a lump sum), the labor category in each invoice shall include detailed descriptions
of task performed and the amount of time incurred for or allocated to that task. City shall
independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work
performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In
the event that no charges or expenses are disputed, the invoice shall be approved and paid
according to the terms set forth in subsection (c). In the event any charges or expenses are
disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and
resubmission.
(c) Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultan
t
which are disputed by City, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within
forty-five (45) days of receipt of Consultant's correct and undisputed invoice.
(d) Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuan
t to this Agreement shall not
be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant.
RIV #14822-7830-0.520 v1 _ 2 _
SECTION 5. INSPECTION AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE.
City may inspect and accept or reject any of Consultant's work under this Agreement,
either during performance or when completed. City shall reject or finally accept Consultant's
work within sixty (60) days after submitted to City. City shall reject work by a timely written
explanation, otherwise Consultant's work shall be deemed to have been accepted. City's
acceptance shall be conclusive as to such work except with respect to latent defects, fraud and
such gross mistakes as amount to fraud. Acceptance of any of Consultant's work by City shall
not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement including, but not limited to,
sections 16 and 17, pertaining to indemnification and insurance, respectively.
SECTION 6. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
All original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data,
notes, computer files, files and other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Consultant
in the course of providing any services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property
of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of the
Consultant. Upon completion, expiration or termination of this Agreement, Consultant shall turn
over to City all such original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys,
reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents.
If and to the extent that City utilizes for any purpose not related to this Agreement any
maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer
files, files or other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Consultant in the course of
providing any services pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant's guarantees and warrants related
to Standard of Performance and found in Section 9 of this Agreement shall not extend to such
use of the maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes,
computer files, files or other documents.
SECTION 7. CONSULTANT'S BOOKS AND RECORDS.
(a) Consultant shall maintain any and all documents and records demonstrating or
relating to Consultant's performance of services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall
maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, or other
documents or records evidencing or relating to work, services, expenditures and disbursements
charged to City pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be sufficiently
complete and detailed so as to permit an accurate evaluation of the services provided by
Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be
maintained for three years from the date of execution of this Agreement and to the extent
required by laws relating to audits of public agencies and their expenditures.
(b) Any and all records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this
section shall be made available for inspection, audit and copying, at any time during regular
business hours, upon request by City or its designated representative. Copies of such documents
or records shall be provided directly to the City for inspection, audit and copying when it is
practical to do so; otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, such documents and
RN 44822-7830-4520 vl _ 3 -
records shall be made available at Consultant's address indicated for receipt of notices in this
Agreement.
(c) Where City has reason to believe that any of the documents or records required to
be maintained pursuant to this section may be lost or discarded due to dissolution or termination
of Consultant's business, City may, by written request, require that custody of such documents or
records be given to the City and that such documents and records be maintained by the requesting
party. Access to such documents and records shall be granted to City, as well as to its
successors -in -interest and authorized representatives.
SECTION 8. STATUS OF CONSULTANT.
(a) Consultant is and shall at all times remain a wholly independent contractor and
not an officer, employee or agent of City. Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any
manner, nor to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City,
whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this
Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City.
(b) The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of
Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City,
nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall have
control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents
except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent
that Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials,
officers, employees or agents of City.
(c) Neither Consultant , nor any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, shall
obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to
City's employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may have to any such
rights.
SECTION 9. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE.
Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities
necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough,
competent and professional manner. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to
the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. In meeting its
obligations under this Agreement, Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted
standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing services similar to those
required of Consultant under this Agreement. In addition to the general standards of
performance set forth this Section 9, additional specific standards of performance and
performance criteria are set forth in the Scope of Work that shall also be applicable to
Consultants work under this Contract. Where there is a conflict between a general and a specific
standard of performance or performance criteria, the specific standard or criteria shall prevail
over the general.
If and to the extent that City utilizes for any purpose not related to this Agreement any
maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer
RN 44822-7830-4520 v1 .4-
files, files or other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Consultant in the course of
providing any services pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant's guarantees and warranties
related to Standard of Performance shall not extend to such use of the maps, models, designs,
drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other
documents.
SECTION 10. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS; PERMITS AND
LICENSES.
Consultant shall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state and
local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations and rules in effect during the term of this
Agreement. Consultant shall obtain any and all licenses, permits and authorizations necessary to
perform the services set forth in this Agreement. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed
boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a
result of any failure of Consultant to comply with this section.
SECTION 11. PREVAILING WAGE LAWS
Itis the understanding of City and Consultant that California prevailing wage laws do not
apply to this Agreement because the Agreement does not involve any of the following services
subject to prevailing wage rates pursuant to the California Labor Code or regulations
promulgated thereunder: Construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work
performed on public buildings, facilities, streets or sewers done under contract and paid for in
whole or in part out of public funds. In this context, "construction" includes work performed
during the design and preconstruction phases of construction including, but not limited to,
inspection and land surveying work.
SECTION 12. NONDISCRIMINATION.
Consultant shall not discriminate, in any way, against any person on the basis of race,
color, religious creed, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, physical handicap, medical condition or
marital status in connection with or related to the performance of this Agreement.
SECTION 13. UNAUTHORIZED ALIENS.
Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et sem., as amended, and in connection
therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ
such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement,
and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized
aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or
sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by City.
SECTION 14. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.
(a) Consultant covenan
RIV#4822-7830-4520 v1 _ 5 _
ts
that neither it, nor any officer or principal
of its firm; has or
shall acquire
any interest,
directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any
manner with the
interests of
City or which
would in
any way hinder Consultant's performance
of services under
RIV#4822-7830-4520 v1 _ 5 _
this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no
person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or
subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Manager. Consultant agrees to at all
rimes avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of
City in the performance of this Agreement.
(b) City understands and acknowledges that Consultant is, as of the date of execution
of this Agreement, independently involved in the performance of non -related services for other
governmental agencies and private parties. Consultant is unaware of any stated position of City
relative to such projects. Any future position of City on such projects shall not be considered a
conflict of interest for purposes of this section.
(c) City understands and acknowledges that Consultant will, perform non -related
services for other governmental agencies and private parties following the completion of the
scope of work under this Agreement. Any such future service shall not be considered a conflict
of interest for purposes of this section.
SECTION 15. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION; RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
(a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of
this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain
or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or
work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the
City Manager, except as may be required by law.
(b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without
prior written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney of
City, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to
interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement.
Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant
gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
(c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant,
provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the
right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees,
including attorneys fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant's conduct.
(d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant , its officers, employees,
agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition,
request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court
order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder.
City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any
deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to
provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by
Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by
City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
RIV 44822-7830-4520 v1 .6-
SECTION 16. INDEMNIFICATION.
(a) Indemnification by Design Professional. As provided under Civil Code Section
2782.8, Consultant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its
officials, employees and agents ("Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all claims.
actions and proceedings (whether at law or equity, administrative or judicial), demands, orders,
judgments, losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including attorney's fees and costs,
(collectively "Claims") to the extent same arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence,
recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its officers, agents, employees or sub -
consultants (or any entity or individual that Consultant shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the
performance of professional services under this Agreement, with the understanding that in the
event Claims are found by the trier of fact to have been caused by the joint or concurrent
negligence of the City and its contractors and consultants, and Consultant, damages and expenses
from both indemnity and duty to defend obligations shall be home by each party in proportion to
its negligence.
(b) Indemnification from Sub -Consultants. Consultant agrees to obtain executed
indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth here in this section from each
and every sub -consultant / contract or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on
behalf of Consultant in the performance of this Agreement naming the Indemnified Parties as
additional indemnitees. In the event Consultant fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from
others as required here, Consultant agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this
section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional
obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to
indemnify and defend City as set forth herein is binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of
Consultant and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this section.
(c) City's Sole Negligence. The provisions of this Section 16 do not apply to Claims
occurring as a result of City's sole negligence. The provisions of this section shall not release
City from liability arising from gross negligence or willful acts or omissions of City or any and
all of its officials, employees and agents.
SECTION 17. INSURANCE.
Consultant agrees to obtain and maintain in full force and effect during the term of this
Agreement the insurance policies set forth in Exhibit "C" "Insurance," which is incorporated
herein by this reference. All insurance policies shall be subject to approval by City as to form
and content. These requirements are subject to amendment or waiver if so approved in writing
by the City Manager. Consultant agrees to provide City with copies of required policies upon
request.
SECTION 18. ASSIGNMENT.
The expert
ise and experience of Consultant are material considerations for this
Agreement. City has an interest in the qualifications of and capability of the persons and entities
who will fulfill the duties and obligations imposed upon Consultant under this Agreement. In
recognition of that interest, Consultant shall not assign or transfer this Agreement or any portion
of this Agreement or the performance of any of Consultant's duties or obligations under this
RN #4822-7830-4520 vl _ '7
_
Agreement without the prior written consent of the City Council. Any attempted assignment
shall be ineffective, null and void, and shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement
entitling City to any and all remedies at law or in equity, including summary termination of this
Agreement. City acknowledges, however, that Consultant, in the performance of its duties
pursuant to this Agreement, may utilize subcontractors.
SECTION 19. CONTINUITY OF PERSONNEL.
Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of
Consultant's staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this
Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant's staff and subcontractors,
if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any
such performance.
SECTION 20. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.
(a) City may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time by giving
thirty (30) days written notice of termination to Consultant. In the event such notice is given,
Consultant shall cease immediately all work in progress.
(b) Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause at any time upon thirty (30)
days written notice of termination to City.
(c) If either Consultant or City fail to perform any material obligation under this
Agreement, then, in addition to any other remedies, either Consultant, or City may terminate this
Agreement immediately upon written notice.
(d) Upon termination of this Agreement by either Consultant or City, all property
belonging exclusively to City which is in Consultant's possession shall be returned to City.
Consultant shall furnish to City a final invoice for work performed and expenses incurred by
Consultant, prepared as set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement. This final invoice shall be
reviewed and paid in the same manner as set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement.
SECTION 21. DEFAULT.
In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall
not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed
after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the
reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the
default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not
reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the
City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the
invoices. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the
outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the
City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under Section 20. Any failure on the
part of the City to give notice of the Consultant's default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver
of the City's legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.
RIV #4822-7830-4520 vl _ 8 _
SECTION 22. EXCUSABLE DELAYS.
Consultant shall not be liable for damages, including liquidated damages, if any, caused
by delay in performance or failure to perform due to causes beyond the control of Consultant.
Such causes include, but are not limited to, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, acts of federal,
state or local governments, acts of City, court orders, fires, floods, epidemics, strikes, embargoes,
and unusually severe weather. The term and price of this Agreement shall be equitably adjusted
for any delays due to such causes.
SECTION 23. COOPERATION BY CITY.
All public information, data, reports, records, and maps as are existing and available to
City as public records, and which are necessary for carrying out the work as outlined in the
Exhibit "A" "Scope of Services," shall be furnished to Consultant in every reasonable way to
facilitate, without undue delay, the work to be performed under this Agreement.
SECTION 24. NOTICES.
All notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and
shall be personally delivered, or sent by telecopier or certified mail, postage prepaid and return
receipt requested, addressed as follows:
To City: City of Temple City
Attn: City Manager
9701 Las Tunas Dr.
Temple City, CA 91780
To Consultant: GPA Consulting
Attn: Andrea Galvin
231 California Street
El Segundo, CA 90245
Notice shall be deemed effective on the date personally delivered or transmitted by
facsimile or, if mailed, three (3) days after deposit of the same in the custody of the United States
Postal Service.
SECTION 25. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE.
The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant represents and
warrants that he/she/they has/have the authority to so execute this Agreement and to bind
Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
SECTION 26. ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION
This Agreement shall be administered and executed by the City Manager or his or her
designated representative, following approval of this Agreement by the City Council, The City
Manager shall have the authority to issue interpretations and to make minor amendments to this
RN #4822-7830-4520 vl .9-
Agreement on behalf of the City so long as such actions do not materially change the Agreement
or make a commitment of additional funds of the City. All other changes, modifications, and
amendments shall require the prior approval of the City Council,
SECTION 27. BINDING EFFECT.
This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and
assigns of the parties.
SECTION 28. MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT.
No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing
and approved by the Consultant and by the City Council. The parties agree that this requirement
for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.
SECTION 29. WAIVER.
Waiver by any party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this
Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by
any party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any
other provision nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this
Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a
waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement.
SECTION 30. LAW TO GOVERN; VENUE.
This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed according to the laws of the
State of California. In the event of litigation between the parties, venue in state trial courts shall
lie exclusively in the County of Los Angeles, California. In the event of litigation in a U.S.
District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in Los Angeles.
SECTION 31. ATTORNEYS FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES.
In the event litigation or other proceeding is required to enforce or interpret any provision
of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation or other proceeding shall be entitled to
an award of reasonable attorney's fees, costs and expenses, in addition to any other relief to
which it may be entitled.
SECTION 32. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.
This Agreement, including the attached Exhibits "A" through "C", is the entire, complete,
final and exclusive expression of the parties with respect to the matters addressed therein and
supersedes all other Agreements or understandings, whether oral or written, or entered into
between Consultant and City prior to the execution of this Agreement. No statements,
representations or other Agreements, whether oral or written, made by any party which are not
embodied herein shall be valid and binding. No amendment to this Agreement shall be valid and
binding unless in writing duly executed by the parties or their authorized representatives.
RIV #4822-7830-4520 v7 _ 1 Q _
SECTION 33. SEVERABILITY.
If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is declared or determined by any
court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of
this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and the Agreement shall be read and construed
without the invalid, void or unenforceable provision(s).
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date
and year first -above written.
ATTEST:
Peggy IQ o
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By:
City Attorney
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
By:
City Manager
NOTE: CONSULTANT'S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND
APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE
R1V #4822-7830-4520 v1 _ I j -
REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR
OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO DEVELOPER'S
BUSINESS ENTITY.
RN#4822-7830-A520 v1 _ 12, _
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OE CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF Ld5 � vs /
,1 / No / ry �vb/�G rtA a1r� 6,.1v.�,
On ttV Z6*4 ZD/3before me, {b;rrn 3 4rfdt �, personally appeared T� awv'a , proved to me on
the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) ieare subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that Ir€Is73e/they executed the same in h s>`/ er/theu authorized capacity(ies), and that by
WsA5ktheir signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
I certify
under PENALTY
OF PER7URY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is
true and
correct.
wrTNEss my hand d official seal. AARON!
+wCOMM. #1876608
,
NOTI�qY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
;*
,
t
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could
prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
❑ INDIVIDUAL
❑ CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLES)
F1PARTNER(S) F] LIMITED
❑ GENERAL
❑ ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
❑ TRUSTEE(S)
❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
❑ OTHER
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
(NAME OF PERSONS) OR ENTITY(IES))
RIV #4822-7830-0520 vl
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
NUMBER OF PAGES
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNERS) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOV$
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
(NAME OF PERSONS) OR ENTITY(IES))
RIV #4822-7830-0520 vl
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
NUMBER OF PAGES
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNERS) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOV$
6876 vl
RN H4822-7830-4520 vl
EXHIBITS "A"
SCOPE OF SERVICES AND COMPENSATION
A-1
6876 vl
RIV #4822-7830-4520 vl
EXHIBITS "B"
COMPENSATION
B-1
EXHIBIT "C"
INSURANCE
Al Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall provide and maintain insurance,
acceptable to the City Manager or City Counsel, in full force and effect throughout the term of
this Agreement, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise
from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Consultant, its agents,
representatives or employees. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's
rating of no less than ANII. Consultant shall provide the following scope and limits of
insurance:
1. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional
liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant's profession. This coverage may be written on a
"claims made" basis, and must include coverage for contractual liability. The professional
liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based
upon, arising out of or related to services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must
be maintained for at least 3 consecutive years following the completion of Consultant's services
or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional 3 -year period, Consultant shall
annually and upon request of the City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage.
2. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits of
professional liability insurance no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence.
B. Other Provisions. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be
endorsed and state the coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by the insurer or either
party to this Agreement, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days' prior written notice
by Certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to City.
C. Other Requirements. Consultant agrees to deposit with City, at or before the
effective date of this contract, certificates of insurance necessary to satisfy City that the insurance
provisions of this contract have been complied with. The City Attorney may require that
Consultant furnish City with copies of original endorsements effecting coverage required by this
Section. The certificates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that
insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified
copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
1. Consultant shall furnish certificates and endorsements fr
om each
subcontractor identical to those Consultant provides.
2. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and
approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such
deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed
officers, officials, employees and volunteers or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing
payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims.
RiV #4822-7830-4520 vl
C-1
3. The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not be
construed to limit Consultant's liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions
and requirements of this Agreement.
RN #4822-7830-4520 vl
C -Z
COVER LETTER
A
July 22, 2013
Mr. Geoffrey Starns, AICP, Planning Manager
City of Temple City
9701 Las Tunas Drive
Temple City, CA 91780
RE: Creation of a Historic Preservation Ordinance
Dear Mr, Starns,
GPA Consulting (GPA) is pleased to submit this proposal to prepare a Historic Preservation
Ordinance for the City of Temple City. We would like to illustrate that the GPA team would
provide the City with our complete commitment. Our overriding goal is to ensure that all work
products are completed in the most accurate, professional, efficient, responsive, timely, and
financially accountable manner possible.
We have put together an outstanding team of professionals to meet the needs of the City.
The GPA project team members meet the Secretary of Interior's Professional Qualifications for
History and Architectural History as set for in 36 CFR Part 61, and have several years of
experience practicing in the fields of architectural history and historic preservation in
California. The GPA project contact person will be Andrea Galvin, who will serve as the
overall project manager; she has successfully assisted with the development of historic
preservation programs all over California. Her previous experience includes working for the
California State Office of Historic Preservation, the California Department of Transportation,
and the California Department of Parks and Recreation.
On behalf of GPA, we appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal. We are confident
that our familiarity with working with ordinances and cities will enable us to provide quality
services and products for this assignment.
We look forward to working with you on this project. Please feel free to contact me anytime
with questions regarding this proposal at (310) 792-2690, Fax (310) 792-2696 or by email of
andrea@gpaconsultina-us.com.
Sincerely,,
I
Andrea Galvin
President
GPA
CONSULTING �
PROPOSAL FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
-. CITY OF TEMPLE
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
G I IA
SYNOPSIS.............................................................................................................. _..................... .......
.........................3
SCOPEOF WORK............ be 60004 meafe*4 ***Sao DODO go poled4sto of f4vofpDvv4 B094 1 *1 @*to 44,4,plp
DETAILED WORK PLAN & SCHEDULE...........................................Pee ..............,...... too .....
.......,........,......7
PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS..................................:..........:..............:...........................................................11
STATEMENTOf EXPERIENCE..............................:.............................:..:................................:::...................:..:........16
REFERENCES...........................................................................................................................:............................:.....19
CONTRACTS COMPLETED DURING THE LAST THREE YEARS...:.....:....:..........:...............:....:...:.........................20
GPACONSULTING PROPOSAL FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE CITY OF TEMPLE CM MY2013
2
SYNOPSIS
If is our understanding that the City of Temple City ( Y1 is seeking a qualified historic
preservation consulting team to prepare a historic preservation ordinance for the City. Currently,
the City does not have any historic preservation mechanisms in place such as a historic
preservation ordinance, criteria for designation, or a historic preservation element as part of its
General Plan. However, the City does have an active historical society, which maintains a
historic museum and archives of historical photographs and other documents relating to the
history of Temple City.
In 2012, the City conducted a historic resources urvey; whereby approximately 100 buildings
were identified as historically significant. The survey covered the entire city, including all
properties constructed prior to 1970. Surveyors identified properties that appeared eligible for
individual designation as landmarks or points of interest, as well as geographically -definable
areas that appeared eligible for designation as Historic Districts or Conservation Areas. All
identified properties were evaluated for potential listing in the National Register of Historic
Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, and for local listing. In addition to the
survey, the Cify had a historic context statement prepared for the city to provide a framework
for resource identification and evaluation in the future. The Survey Report recommended that
the City consider establishing a local historic preservation ordinance that would be structured to
address the particular needs of Temple City, Specifically, the report recommended that the
ordinance include:
• A provision for the establishment of a local historic commission,. including the powers and
responsibilities assigned to that commission
• A provision for the establishment of a local inventory of historic properties
• A process for the designation of individual landmarks, points of interest and historic
districts
• Criteria used to evaluate potential historic propert
ies, consistent with the criteria of the
California Register of Historical Resources
• A process of design review for historic properties, including a description of alterations
requiring review, and an appeals process
A provision for economic hardship in the case that designation or denial of a building
permit would cause extreme hardship
A requirement that property owners maintain designated resources, including guidelines
for appropriate treatments of historic materials and features
• A provision outlining incentives for designated historic resources
The City of Temple City is primarily a city of residential neighborhoods with commercial
development clusfiered along major transportation corridors. Thee city's earliest development
dates to the first quarter of the 20th century, when modest bungalows and simple farm houses
sprouted amidst the largely agricultural San Gabriel Valley. Today, Craftsman bungalows from
the 1020s share the block with revival -style houses from the 1930s, postwar tract homes from the
950s and 1960s, as well as more recent single-family houses. Apartment and condominium
buildings from the 1970s and later are clustered along arterial streets such as Rosemead and
Temple City boulevards. The city's commercial areas include a combination of modest
storefronts from the 19206 to 1950s and more contemporary development, including gas stations,
GPA CONSULTING I
PROPOSAL FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION OjtOINANCE
I CITYOFTEMPLE CItt
l lUL1'2013
3
SYNOPSIS
�JPJA
fast-food restaurants and shopping centers: Most of the institutional buildings date from the post-
war period. Collectively, the architectural resources throughout the city represent several
development patterns. The city's population (2010) is 35,558.
The City of Temple City recently celebrated its 50th anniversary as an incorporated city; and as
such has prepared an ambitious work plan for the next 50 years. The City has an interest in
preserving the historic character of its diverse neighborhoods as part of that Work Plan and is
seeking the assistance of a historic preservation consulting firm to provide innovative solutions to
the preservation of Temple City's historic places and to prepare a historic preservation
ordinance. The City has a particular interest in coordinating its policy-making efforts with the
public and persons with an interest In preserving the city's historic resource. The City expects the
documents to be clear, concise, and easy to read.
To assist the City of Temple City with their interest in preserving historic resources within their city,
GPA brings a broad foolkit of experience and ideas to prepare a historic preservation
ordinance, including working with the planning department and public to identify the city's
needs, breaking down the necessary steps into a logical and comprehensive approach, taking
the concern and fear out of the process of new policy making by conducting workshops for the
public and decision makers, and making all information available to the public during the
ordinance preparation process.
GPA has a variety of experience in working with local governments to establish local
preservation policy, including preparing Work Plans, Historic Resources Elements of the General
Plan, conducting city-wide surveys, and preparing historic ordinances: When working with local
governments on developing historic preservation ordinances, GPA utilizes the California Office of
Historic Preservation Department of Parks and Recreation Technical Assistance Series 14: Drafting
Effective Historic Preservation Ordinances as a guide.
GPA CONSULTING I
PROPOSAL FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
I CITY OFTEMPLE Cf7Y
I JULY 2013
4
SCOPE OF WORK
G�F'1A
The success of a comprehensive preservation ordinance lies in the process of developing the
policy and working closely with the city staff and public, "Community outreach and education is
imperative to a well-balanced, public -supported document that can be successfully carried out
into the future. Inherently, with policy documents that have the potential to affect the actual or
perceived rights of property owners, the process of developing and passing those documents
often comes with public concern or fear. Therefore, GPA has developed a scope of work that
includes ample time and consideration of community participation and property owner's needs.
Following is the proposed scope of work:
Task 1;
PROPOSAL FOR HISrONCPPESERVATION ORDINANCE. I CITY DF TEMPtE aTY I JULV20
project Management/ Consultation with the City Staff
•
Manage project budget and schedule
Conduct internal project team meetings
•
Consult with City staff, prepare meeting agendas and minutes, notes, as
appropriate
•
Review staff timesheets, prepare Invoices, provide progress reports to City staff
•
Schedule meetings and work program tasks
•
NOTE: City staff will be responsible to all public noticing and
Task 2:
Prepare a Detailed Work Program & Outreach Plan
In conjunction with the City staff, prepare a detailed schedule of dates and
activities, including milestones for project completion, review, and adoption.
•
Review other city ordinances
•
Review OHP Technical Assistance Bulletin 14 with City staff
•
Prepare detailed work program and outreach plan; submit to City staff
•
The City desires to complete the entire project in six months
Task 3:
Conduct Meetings
•
Identify and prepare appropriate outreach methods and materials
(e.g, fliers,
direct mailers, website, etc.)
Prepare meeting materials, presentations, and notice fliers for meetings
•
Facilitate 2 public workshops
•
Facilitate 2 Planning Commission study sessions
Facilitate 2City Council study sessions
•
Participate in 2 public hearings before the Planning Commission
•
Participate in 2 public hearings before the City Council
Task 4:
Prepare Administrative Draff Ordinance
•
Meet with City Staff and identify City's goals and requirements for ordinance
•
Identify and Establish:
o Who the reviewing body will be (new historic preservation commission or
assign duties to existing planning commission) identify the powers and
responsibilities assigned to that commission
o Process for establishing a local inventory of historic properties
o A process for the designation of individual landmarks, points of interest
and historic districts
13
SCOPE OF WORK
0W
o Criteria used to evaluate potential historic properties, consistent with the
criteria of the California Register of Historical Resources
o A process of design review for historic properties, including a description
of alterations requiring review, and an appeals process (major and minor
alterations, etc.)
o A provision for economic hardship in the case that designation or denial
of a building permit would cause extreme hardship
o A requirement that property owners maintain designated resources,
including guidelines for appropriate treatments of historic materials and
features
o A provision outlining incentives for designated historic resources
• Prepare Administrative Draft Ordinance
• Peer review Administrative Draft and submit to city for review and comment
Task 5: Prepare Final Ordinance
• Prepare two revisions to Administrative Draft based on public and City comments
Attend Planning Commission and City Council Public Hearings (also covered in
Task 3 above)
• Submit Administrative proof document and final electronic/digital copies of
historic preservation ordinance (including graphics, as appropriate) to the City, as
requested.
GPA CONSULTING I
PROPOSAL FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
I CfTY OF TEMPLE CITU
I IULY 2013
6
$COPE OF WORK
GIP A
PAH AAH
1.0
General project management
4
ongoing
1.1
Kick off meeting- Meet with City Staff- identify goals and
3
3
Month 1
objectives of HP Ordinance
2.1
Review other city historic preservation ordinances- prepare
6
summary for City's consideration; identify relevant sections
and approaches for City
2.2
Review OHP Technical Assistance #14 with City Staff-
1
1
identify details to be included in ordinance
2.3
Prepare detailed Work Plan and Community Participation
1
Program with input from staff
2.4
Submit Work Plan and Community Participation Program to
0
staff; conduct pre -planning conference call
3.1
Prepare Planning Commission Hearing #1 Presentation
1
4
Month 1
3.2
Submit PC Hearing #1 Presentation to city staff
0
3.3
Planning Commission Hearing #1- Introduce project to PC
5
Month 1
3.4
Prepare City Council Hearing#1 Presentation
2
3.5
Submit CC Hearing #1 Presentation to City Staff
0
3.6
City Council Hearing #1- Introduce project to CC
5
4.1
Prepare Draft Outline of Sections and select sections for HP
2
Ordinance
4.2
Peer review Draft outline of Sections and select sections for
1
HP Ordinance
4.3
Submit Draft Outline of Sections and select sections for HP
0
Month 2
Ordinance to City staff for review
3.7
Prepare Notice Materials for Public Workshop #1 -notify
2
property owners (target affected property owners, realtors,
historical society members, business owners, and public
officials)
1.0
Notice Public Workshop #1 (City)
0
1.0
Conduct pre -planning conference call with City staff
1
1
3.8
Prepare Public Workshop #1 Materials/ Presentation
1
8
3.9
Submit Public Workshop #1 Materials/Presentation to City
0
staff
GPA CONSULTING I
PROPOSALFaP HISTOPIC PRESERVATION OftUiNANCE
I CITY OFTEMPU:GN
I JULY2D13
7
SCOPE OF WORK
GTP I A
3.1
Facilitate Public Workshop #1- Introduce what an HP
5 5 Month 2
Ordinance is and what it includes; listen to public
concerns/comments
1.2
Prepare notes/ minutes from comments at Public Workshop
1
#1
1.3
Notice Planning Commission study session #1 (City)
0 Month 2
3.1
Prepare Planning Commission study session #1 Materials/
1 2
Presentation
3.1
Submit Planning Commission study session #1
0
Materials/Presentation to City staff
1.4
Conduct pre planning meeting with City staff
1 1
3.1
Facilitate Planning Commission study session #1- Identify
5 Month 2
recommended sections/inclusion for the HP Ordinance and
disclose public concerns/comments from Public Workshop
#1; receive input and direction from PC
1.5
Prepare notes/ review minutes from PC study session #1
1
1.6
Notice City Council study session #1 (City)
0
3.1
Prepare City Council study session #1 Materials/
2
Presentation
3.2
Submit City Council study session #1 Materials/Presentation
0
to City staff
1.7
Conduct pre -planning conference call with City staff
1 1
3.2
Facilitate City Council study session #1- Disclose
5 Month 2
recommended sections/inclusion for the HP Ordinance and
disclose public concerns/comments from Public Workshop
#1; receive input and direction from CC
1,8
Prepare notes/ review meeting minutes from CC study
1
session #1
4.4
Prepare Administrative Draft Historic Preservation
4 40 Month 3
Ordinance
4.5
Peer review Administrative Draft HP Ordinance
4
4.6
Submit Administrative Draft HP Ordinance to City staff for
0
pre -review
1.9
Meet with City staff to review Administrative Draft Historic
1 1
Preservation Ordinance (conference call)
4.7
Revise Administrative Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance
4
based on City staff comments
CONSULTING I PPOPOSAL FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE � CRY OFTEMPLE CIN
8
SCOPE OF WORK
G PA
3.2
Prepare Notice Materials for Public Workshop #2- notify
2
I CITVOF TEMPLE CITU
property owners (target affected property owners, realtors,
9
historical society members, business owners, and public
officials)
1.1
Notice Public Workshop #2 (City)
0
1.1
Conduct pre -planning conference call with City staff
T 1
3.2
Prepare Public Workshop #2 Materials/ Presentation
4
3.2
Submit Public Workshop #2 Materials/Presentation to City
0
staff
1.1
Conduct pre -planning conference call with City staff
1 1
3.2
Facilitate Public Workshop #2- Provide copies of
5 5 Month 3
Administrative Draft HP Ordinance; review ordinance with
public, listen to public concerns/comments
1.1
Prepare notes/ review meeting minutes from Public
1
Workshop #2
498
Revise Administrative Draft HP Ordinance based on public
2 Month 3
comments, as appropriate and directed by City staff
4.9
Peer review revised Administrative Draft HP Ordinance;
1
resubmit to City staff
1.1
Notice Planning Commission study session #2 (City)
0
3.2
Prepare Planning Commission study session #2 Materials/
2
Presentation
3*2
Submit Planning Commission study session#2
0
Materials/Presentation to City staff
3.2
Submit Administrative Draft HP Ordinance to Planning
0
Commissioners for pre -review; identify changes based on
public comment
12
Conduct pre -planning meeting with City staff
1 1
3.2
Facilitate Planning Commission study session#2-Review
5 Month
Administrative Draft HP Ordinance and disclose public
concerns/comments from Public Workshop #2; receive
input and direction from PC
1.2
Prepare notes from PC study session #2; submit to City staff
1
for consideration
1.2
Notice City Council study session #2 (City)
0
3.3
Prepare City Council study session #2 Materials/
2
Presentation
3.3
Submit City Council study session #2 Materials/Presentation
0
to City staff
GPA CONSULTING I
PROPOSAE FOR HISTORIC
PRESERVATION OROINANGE
I CITVOF TEMPLE CITU
9
$COPE OF WORK
G P A
3.3
Submit Administrative Draft HP Ordinance to City Council
Members for pre -review (City)
0
1.2
Conduct pre -planning conference call with City staff
0.5 0.5
3.3
Facilitate City Council study session #2- Disclose
recommended sections/inclusion for the HP Ordinance and
disclose public concerns/comments from Public Workshop
#1; receive input and direction from CC
5 Month 5
1.2
Prepare meeting notes/ review meeting minutes from CC
study session #2
1
5.1
Revise HP Ordinance based on public, PC, and CC comments
2 Month 5
5.2
Peer review final HP Ordinance
1
5.3
Submit Revised HP Ordinance to City staff for review and
comment
0
5.4
Revise HP Ordinance based on City staff comment; submit
to City staff
2
SAS
Submit final HP Ordinance to Planning Commissioners for
pre -review (City)
0
1.2
Conduct pre -meeting conference call with City staff
0.5 0.5
3.3
Prepare Planning Commission Hearing#2 Presentation
2
3.3
Submit PC Hearing #2 Presentation to City Staff
0
3:3
Attend Planning Commission Hearing #2- Recommend
Ordinance to PC
5 Month 6
3.3
Submit final HP Ordinance to City Council Members for pre-
review (City)
0
3.3
Prepare City Council Hearing #2 Presentation
0.5
3.3
Submit CC Hearing #2 Presentation to City Staff
0
1.2
Conduct pre -meeting conference calf with City staff
1 1
3.3
Attend City Council Hearing #2- Recommend Adoption of HP
Ordinance to CC
5 Month 6
546
Submitfinal electronic documents to City (finalize based on
comments only as directed by CC)
0.5
Total Hours
84 118
GPA CONSULTING I
PROPOSAL FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
� CITY OFTEMPIE CIN
I JULY 2013
10
PROJECT STAFF
IPIA
Below is an organ nation chart listing key members of the staff who will work on then project.. Their
resumes are on the following pages. Andrea Galvin will serve as the Project Manager and
facilitate and oversee the completion of the historic preservation ordinance. She has a broad
range of experience working with local governments to develop historic preservation policy
documents, including historic preservation ordinances. This breadth of experience working with
various sized communities will help to facility a work plan and outreach plan to best suit the City
of Temple City's needs. She will be aided by an Associate Architectural Historian, who will
provide technical assistance and guidance.
City of Temple City
Andrea Galvin
Principal
Architectural
Historian
GPA CONSULTING I PROPOSAL FOO F{ISTORIO PRESERVATION ORpINANOE I CITY aFTENIPLE Cn1', JULY 2013
11
Teresa Grimes
Principal
Architectural
Historian
GPA CONSULTING I PROPOSAL FOO F{ISTORIO PRESERVATION ORpINANOE I CITY aFTENIPLE Cn1', JULY 2013
11
.Associate
Architectural
Historian
GPA CONSULTING I PROPOSAL FOO F{ISTORIO PRESERVATION ORpINANOE I CITY aFTENIPLE Cn1', JULY 2013
11
wot
AN
PROJ ECT STAFF
GIPIA
Educational Background:
• M.S., Historic Preservation, University of Pennsylvania,
1999
• Certificate, Preservation Planning, Istanbul Technical
University, Turkey, 1995
• B.S., Environmental Design, University of California, Davis,
1994, with honors.
Professional Experience:
• GPA Consulting, President and Principal Architectural
Historian, 2003 -present
• California Office of Historic Preservation, Associate
Architectural Historian, 2002-2004
• Caltrans, District 7, Los Angeles, Associate Architectural
Historian, 1999-2001( Headquarters, Sacramento, 2001-
2004
• California Department of Parks and Recreation, Cultural
Resource Specialist, 1995-1999
Summary of Experience: Andrea Galvin is the President and Principal Architectural
Historian of
GPA. She has been professionally involved in the research and documentation of historic
districts, sites, buildings, and structures since 1995. Her past experience includes three years with
fhe California Department of Parks and Recreation conducting architectural surveys of historic
buildings and structures, five years with the California Department of Transportation working on
CEQA and Section 106 compliance, and two years with the California Office of Historic
Preservation reviewing projects for Section 106 and Secretary of the Interior's Standards
compliance. As such, Andrea has a deep understanding of the environmental review process as
it relates to historic resources and a close working relationship with decision -makers. Her past
projects have included: assisting the City of Yorba Linda in developing a historic preservation
program; managing a large-scale historic resource survey for the widening of the 1-710 from Los
Angeles to Long Beach; and preparing Section 106 and CEQA compliance reports for several
historic bridge projects such as the La Loma Bridge in Pasadena and the Gtr, Street Viaduct and
North Spring Street Viaduct over the Los Angeles River. Many of Andrea's projects have involved
coordinating with a number of local, state, and federal agencies as well as conducting public
outreach with stakeholder groups. She has conducted training on a wide variety of topics at
conferences and workshops throughout California, and is an active member of several state
and national preservation organizations.
Qualifications: Meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for
architectural history pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR Part 61, Appendix A.
Selected Relevant Projects:
Historic Resources Element. City of Yorba Linda. Prepared the draft historic resources element of
the City's General Plan and contributed to preparation of the environmental document.
Historic Preservation Planning: City of Long. Beach. GPA has a contract with the City of Long
Beach to assist with current and long-range historic preserv
ation planning activities.. Ms. Galvin is
managing the project which includes inspecting all Mills Act Contract properties; documenting
the City's preservation permitting process and making recommendations of improvements;
preparing informational bulletins related to important preservation topics; developing design
guidelines for the City's historic districts; reviewing projects for compliance with the Secretary of
the Interior's Standards; and conducting training for the City staff and commissioners.
GPA CONSULTINGI PROPOSAL FOR HISTORIC
PRESERVATION ORDINANfP
aTY OF TEMPLE CITY
I JULY 2013
12
PROJECT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS
GIPIA
Historic Resource Survey and Conxfi Stafiemenfi. City of La Habra, Managed the project, co -
conducted the fieldwork, evaluated properties based on national, state, and local criteria,
presented the survey findings, and peer reviewed all work products.
Historic Resource Survey and Content Statement. City of Yorba Linda. Managed the project,
co -conducted the reconnaissance survey, co-authored the historic context
Downtown Dinuba Historic District Survey. City of Dinuba. Managed the project and peer
eviewed all work products.
Historic Resource Survey. City of San Juan Bautista. Managed the project and peer reviewed all
work products.
Santa Paula Railroad Depot and Mill. City of Santa Paula. Managed the project, conducted the
fieldwork and research, evaluated the building based on National Register criteria, identified the
character -defining features of the building, reviewed plans for compliance with the Secretary of
the Interior's Standards, prepared the Historic Resource Evaluation report, the Finding of Effects
Report, and Conditional No Adverse Effect Report,
GPACONSIILTNG I
PI{OP�SN. FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATIONOR�INANCE
CITYOf TEMPLE GTV
I JULV 2013
TERESA GRIMES
PROJECTSTAFF
cIPlA
Educational Background:
• M.A., Architecture, University of California, Los Angeles,
1992
• B.A., Political Science, University of California, Los
Angeles, 1986
Professional Experience:
• GPA Consulting, Principal Architectural Historian, 2009 -
present
• Christopher A. Joseph & Associates; Senior Architectural
Historian, 2006-2009
• Teresa Grimes/Historic Preservation, Principal, 1999-2005,
1993-1994, 1991-1992
• Historic Resources Group, Project Manager/Architectural
Historian, 1994-1998
Getty Conservation Institute, Research Associate, 1992-
1993
• Los Angeles Conservancy, Preservation Officer, 1988-
1991
Summary of Experience: Teresa Grimes is a Principal Architectural Historian at GPA. She has over
25 years of experience in the field of historic preservation in the private, public, and non-profit
sectors. She is widely recognized as an expert in the identification and evaluation of historic
resources having successfully prepared dozens of landmark and historic district applications for a
wide variety of property types including residential districts, commercial districts; single-family
residences, major office buildings, bridges, gardens; hospitals, hotels, and cultural landscapes.
Her many projects include city-wide historic context statements for Calabasas, Glendale, and
Carmekby-the-Sea, and historic resources surveys in Pasadena and Los Angeles, Ms. Grimes has
aIso completed numerous environmental compliance documents involving major landmarks;
examples include the Cinerama Dome, Dodger Stadium, Los Angeles Sports Arena, Beverly Hills
Post Office, Wholesale Produce Market, Barry Building, Temple Israel, Pantages Theater, and
Baldwin Hills Shopping Centers. Ms. Grimes has also completed several Federal Rehabilitation Tax
Credit applications; examples include the Young's Market Company Building and Kerckhoff
Building and Annex. She won awards for her National Register application for the Arroyo Seco
Parks and Recreation Historic District in Pasosdena and a Multiple Property Documentation Form
for Historic Resources Associated with African Americans in Los Angeles. Her recent projects
have included: managing the preparation of a treatment plan for the Hughes Industrial District in
Playa Vista; assisting design and development teams in the rehabilitation of the United Artists
Theater, Rosslyn Hotel Annex, Normandie Hotel, and Evanston Inn; and coordinating historic
resource surveys of the Wilmington and Harbor Gateway Community Plan Areas in Los Angeles.
Teresa has served on a number of boards and commissions including the West Hollywood
Cultural Heritage Advisory Board, Highland Park Heritage Trust, and Pasadena Heritage.
Qualifications: Ms. Grimes meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications
Standards for history and architectural history pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations, 36
CFR Part 61, Appendix A.
Selected Relevant Protects:
West Hollywood Historic Preservation Element. City of West Hollywood. Project manager and
principal author of the West Hollywood Historic Preservation Element of the General Plan.
Historic Preservation Ordinance. City of Rancho Mirage. Assisted with the development of the
City's historic preservation ordinance.
GPA CONSULTING I PROPOSALGOR HISTORCPRESERVATION.OROINANCE CIiv OFTEMPLE CRY I J= 2013
14
TIONS
G PIA
New Pershing Apartments. City of Los Angeles. Managed the project, evaluated the potential
historic resources based on national, state, and local criteria, identified the character -defining
features of the building, reviewed plans for compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's
Standards, and authored the Historic Resource Report including impacts analysis.
Hollywood and Western. City of Los Angeles. Managed the project, conducted the fieldwork
and research, identified and described the historic resources on the project site, reviewed plans
for compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards, and authored the Historic Resource
Report including impact analysis.
Northeast Los Angeles Survey. City of Los Angeles. Managed the project, co -conducted the
fieldwork, recorded the potential historic resources, presented the survey findings, and peer
reviewed the final report.
Survey LA Year 1. Group 3. City of Los Angeles. Managed the project, coordinated with the
other firms, co -conducted the fieldwork, recorded the potential historic resources, and peer
reviewed the final report.
Survey LA Year 1, Group 2. City of Los Angeles. Managed the project, coordinated with the
other firms, co -conducted the fieldwork, recorded the potential historic resources, presented the
survey findings, and peer reviewed the final report.
Survey t,AYear 1. Group 1. City of Los Angeles. Coordinated with the other firms, co -conducted
the fieldwork, and recorded the potential historic resources.
Old San Diego and Midway/Pacific Highway Historic Resource Survey and Context Statement.
City of San Diego. Managed the project, co -conducted the fieldwork, evaluated properties
based on local criteria, presented the survey findings at various community meetings, and wrote
the historic context statement for the Midway/Pacific Highway area.
Multiple Property Documentation (MPD) Form for Late 191h and Early 201N Century Development
and Architecture. City of Pasadena. Managed the project, conducted the research; and co-
authored the MPD form.
Survey LA Boyle Heights Pilot Survey: City of Los Angeles. Participated in the test by surveying
portions of Boyle Heights and providing comments on how the database and software could be
improved.
Modernism Historic Context Statement. City of Riverside, Managed the project, conducted the
research, and co-authored the historic context statement.
Historic Resource Survey and Context Statement. City of Calabasas. Managed the project, co -
conducted the fieldwork, evaluated properties based on national, state, and local criteria,
wrote the historic context statement, presented the survey findings; and peer reviewed all work
products including state inventory forms.
Multiple Property Documentation (MPD) Form for Historic Resources Associated with the History of
African Americans. City of Los Angeles. Managed the project, conducted the research, co-
authoredthe MPD form, and presented the findings at various community meetings. The project
received a Governor's Award, California Preservation Foundation Award, and Los Angeles
Conservancy Award.
United Artists Theater. City of Los Angeles. Managed the project, conducted the fieldwork and
research, identified the character -defining features of the building, reviewed plans for
compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards; and authored the Historic Resource
Report including impact analysis.
GPA CONSULTINGI PRORo5.4l FORHISTORICPRESERVATION OPDINANtE I CITYOE TEMPLECITY lULY 2013'
STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE
IPIA
Founded in 2003, GPA Consulting is a consulting
firm with full-service historic preservation
capabilities. Our company values are Quality,
Integrity, and Reliability. With these values we are
able to work collaboratively with our clients to
meet their project objectives. Our clients include
government agencies, architects, developers,
and non-profit organizations. We provide a full -
range of services including:
• Historic Preservation Ordinances
• Historic Resource Surveys
• Historic Context Statements
• Professional Peer Review
• Mills Act Applications
• Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit
Applications
• National, State, and Local Landmark
Nominations
• Historic Structures Reports
• NEPA, CEQA, and Section 106 Compliance
Reports
• HABS/HAER Reports
• Public Outreach, Training, and Educational
Programs
The GPA team consists of several highly qualified
professionals who have experience in all aspects
of historic preservation. Each of the GPA team
members meets the Secretary of the Interior's
Professional Qualifications Standards for history
and/or architectural history as outlined in 36 Code
of Federal Regulations Part 61, Appendix A. GPA's
President, Andrea Galvin, is an expert in Section
106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, and
Name: GPA Consulting
Address: 231 California Street, EI
Segundo, CA 90245
Phone: (310) 792-2690
Fax: (310) 792-2696
Legal Entity: California Corporation
Business Names: The business was
established in October, 2003 as a sole
proprietorship under the name of
Galvin & Associates Historic
Preservation Planning Company. The
company was incorporated as
Galvin Preservation Associates Inc. in
August, 2005. In November 2012 GPA
filed for a fictitious business name
and now has the died GPA
Consulting. While our corporation
name still remains Galvin Preservation
Associates Inc., we solely use GPA
Consulting.
Statements: GPA has a demonstrated
capacity to perform the required
services. Our organization Is
adequately staffed and trained to
perform the required services. If
needed, we have the capability to
recruit additionally trained staff.
the Historic American Building Survey. She
founded the company after working for a variety of state agencies;. including the Office of
Historic Preservation, the California Department of Transportation, and the California
Department of Parks and Recreation. CPA's Principal, Teresa Grimes has 25 years of experience
in the field of historic preservation in the private, public, and non-profit sectors and is widely
recognized as an expert in the identification and evaluation of historic resources. The collective
knowledge and experience of our staff is our strongest asset.
GPA CONSULTING
PROPOSAL FOR
HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
I CITY OF TEMPLE CRY
I-IULY
16
STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE
�WLJ
Principal Experience
Andrea Galvin, Principal and President of GPA, will be the principal architectural historian
responsible for performing the required services. She has 18 years of experience and founded
GPA 10 years ago. Her experience is included below in the project examples. She was the
principal in charge for each project and also completed most the work herself. Ms. Galvin has
taught historic preservation classes and seminars for small cities at statewide preservation and
planning conferences and workshops. The topics of the preservation activities include
preparation of preservation ordinances, conducting surveys; preparing preservation elements,
and development of preservation work plans.
Teresar Grimes is also a principal architectural historian at GPA. She has over 25 years of
experience in the field of historic preservation in the private, public, and non-profit sectors. She is
widely recognized as an expert in the identification and evaluation of historic resources. She
was directly involved with the West Hollywood Historic Preservation Element and the Historic
Preservation Ordinance of the City of Rancho Mirage. Both projects she completed while at
another firm. She has been with GPA for 4 years.
Project Experience
Historic Preservation Ordinance & Policy Implementation. City of Yorba Linda. In 2008-10, GPA
prepared a city-wide historic context statement and city-wide survey, which resulted in
recommendation measures to further develop the City's historic preservation program. Following
this effort, in 2012-2013, GPA was contracted to review and update the City's existing policy
including the City's former Historic Preservation Combining Zone and Historic Resources Element
of the City's General Plan. GPA also worked on associated activities including outreach
programs; the development of a Mills Act program, and the establishment of Design Guidelines.
All project components included the preparation of a detailed work plan and outreach
program and working closely with city staff. Ms: Galvin prepared the draft Historic Resources
Element update as well and oversaw the preparation of a new Historic Preservation Ordinance
for the city.
Historic Resource Survey and Context) Statement; Mills Act Feasibility Study. City of Lo Habra,
The City of La Habra seeks to promote the preservation of historic buildings that reflect their
unique architectural and cultural heritage. In 2012, GPA conducted a city-wide historic
resources survey that updated an existing survey. As part of the survey update, and once the
historic resources were identified within the city, GPA was also contracted to conduct a
feasibility study to implement the Mills Act program within their city. This project included working
closely with city staff and the public and decision makers to conduct public outreach meetings,
and inform the stakeholders of what it would take and cost to implement a Mills Act program.
Historic Resource Survey and Context Statement and Historic Resources Element Update. City of
Huntington Beach, The City of Huntington Beach is located on the coastline of northern Orange
County. In 20010-2013, GPA was contracted to conduct a city-wide survey and update the
City's existing Historic Resources Element of the City's General Plan, The City currently does not
have a historic preservation ordinance, although GPA included recommendations for the
establishment of such an ordinance. As part of the project, GPA reviewed the City's existing
Historic Preservation Element, which included extensive coordination with the City staff, Historic
Resources Board, and City Council.
Policy Implementation and Work Plan Training- Design Guidelines. City of Dinuba. GPA
conducted a city-wide historic resources survey for the City of Dinuba in 2010 and prepared a
process and nomination form for a downtown historic district. In addition to the survey efforts,
GPACONSULTING I PROPOSAL FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE i QWOFTWPLE0W I JULY2013
17
STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE
�IPIA
GPA also worked closely with the city staff and community members to conduct public
outreach efforts and neighborhood design guidelines. The result of the survey will be the
completion of a Downtown Historic District and Historic Preservation Plan. As a result of the
nomination, the City revised their historic preservation ordinance. GPA worked closely with the
city to identify needs within their local ordinance that would require revision. In 2012-13, GPA has
conducted a series of training sessions with the City's Historic Preservation Commission to update
their mission, identify Goals, Policies, and Implementation Measures for their City. This has resulted
in a detailed Work Plan and Ordinance update for the City.
City of Burbank Historic Context Statement and Historic Preservation Ordinance Review, In 2004,
GPA prepared a city-wide historic context statement for the City of Burbank. As part of the
project, GPA was contracted to review the City's existing historic preservation ordinance and
provide recommendations for updating the ordinance, GPA prepared a detailed study of their
ordinance, compared it to other ordinances, and prepared detailed recommendations and
language to update their existing historic preservation ordinance.
Historic Preservation Ordinance. City of San Juan Bautista. GPA was contracted in 2009 to
update the City's historic preservation ordinance. After working closely with City Staff, Ms. Galvin
updated their ordinance, but re-establishing powers and duties of existing commissions and
integrating the City's survey findings into the ordinance and overall planning process. GPA
worked with the City to strengthen the City's requirements for demolition by neglect and
penalties for non-compliance.
GPACONSULTING I
PROPOSALFOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
I CITY OF TEMPLE
CITY
I JULY 2073
18
REFERENCES
i= I A
Steven Hams; AICP
Director of Community Development
City of Yorba Linda
4845 Casa Loma Avenue
Yorba Linda, CA 92885
(714)961-7131
s
har(is@yorba-linda.org
Joyne Anderson, Assistant City Manager/City Clerk
City of Dlnuba
1088 E. Kamm Ave.
Dinbuba, CA 93618
(559) 591-5900
JAnderson@dinuba.ca.gov
RoyRamsland, Planning Manager
City of La Habra, Community Development Department
201 E. La Habra Blvd.
La Habra, CA 90631
562-905-9724
royr@lahabracity.com
Ricky Ramos, Senior Planner
City of Huntington Beach
Department of Planning
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
(714) 536-5624
rra
mos@surfclty-hb.org
Matthew Sundt, City Planner
San Juan Bautista Planning Department
311 Second Street
San Juan Bautista, CA 95045
(831)623-4661
GPA CONSULTING I
PROPOSAL FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION OPDINANCE
I CITYOFTEMPLE CITY.
I JULY2013.
YEARS
�IPIA
Historic Preservation Ordinance &Policy Implementation. City of Yorba Linda. In 2008-10, GPA
prepared a city-wide historic context statement and city-wide survey, which resulted in
recommendation measures to further develop the City's historic preservation program. Following
this effort, in 2012-2013, GPA was contracted to review and update the City's existing policy
including the City's former Historic Preservation Combining Zone and Historic Resources Element
of the City's General Plan. GPA also worked on associated activities including outreach
programs, the development of a Mills Act program, and the establishment of Design Guidelines.
All project components included the preparation of a detailed work plan and outreach
program and working closely with city staff. Ms. Galvin prepared the draft Historic Resources
Element update as well and oversaw the preparation of a new Historic Preservation Ordinance
for the city.
Historic Resource Survey and Content Statement; Mills Act Feasibility Study. City of La Habra.
The City of La Habra seeks to promote the preservation of historic buildings that reflect their
unique architectural and cultural heritage. In 2012, GPA conducted a city-wide historic
esources survey that updated an existing survey. As part of the survey update, and once the
historic resources were identified within the city, GPA was also contracted to conduct a
feasibility study to implement the Mills Act program within their city. This project included working
closely with city staff and the public and decision makers to conduct public outreach meetings,
and inform the stakeholders of what it would take and cost to implement a Mills Act program.
Historic Resource Survey and Context Statement and Historic Resources Element Update. City of
Huntington Beach, The City of Huntington Beach is located on the coastline of northern Orange
County. In 20010-2013, GPA was contracted to conduct a city-wide survey and update the
City's existing Historic Resources Element of the City's General Plan. The City currently does not
have a historic preservation ordinance, although GPA included recommendations for the
establishment of such an ordinance. As part of the project, GPA reviewed the City's existing
Historic Preservation Element, which included extensive coordination with the City staff, Historic
Resources Board, and City Council,
Policy Implementation and Work Plan Training- Design Guidelines. City of Dinuba. GPA
conducted a city-wide historic resources survey for the City of Dinuba in 2010 and prepared a
process and nomination form for a downtown historic district. In addition to the survey efforts,
GPA also worked closely with the city staff and community members to conduct public
outreach efforts and neighborhood design guidelines. The result of the survey will be the
completion of a Downtown Historic District and Historic Preservation Plan. As a result of the
nomination, the City revised their historic preservation ordinance. GPA worked closely with the
city to identify needs within their local ordinance that would require revision. In 2012-13, GPA has
conducted a series of training sessions with the City's Historic Preservation Commission to update
their mission, identify Goals, Policies, and Implementation Measures for their City. This has resulted
In a detailed Work Plan and Ordinance update for the City.
GPA CONSU LTING PROPOSAL FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE CrtY DFTEMPLE CITY I JULY 2073.
20
PROPOSED FEE
�w�
Please see proposed fee -fn separate cover.
GPA CONSULTING � PPOPOSAL FOR HISTORIC PftESERVFTION ORDINANCE CRY OF TEMPLE aTr JULY 2013
21
Exhibit B
Principal Architectural Historian 2:OD
Associate Architectural Historian 7.00
Task Subtotal - 9.00
Principal Architectural Historian
Associate Architectural,Historian
Task Subtotal
R. soa„kce 0I taxIt
Principal Architectural Historian
Associate Architectural Historian
Task Subtotal
Principal Architectural Historian
Associate Architectural Historian
Task Subtotal
55.00
40.50
95.50
10.00
48.00
58.00
$180.00
$360.00
$125.00
$875.00
Eust ret �r.€ n cr anea3i
Principal
Architectural Historian
16.00
$180.00
$2,880.00
Associate
Architectural Historian
17.50
$125.00
$2,187.50
Task Subtotal
33.50
$5,067.50
`'eog
i•ur?..z,�l�
Principal Architectural Historian 2:OD
Associate Architectural Historian 7.00
Task Subtotal - 9.00
Principal Architectural Historian
Associate Architectural,Historian
Task Subtotal
R. soa„kce 0I taxIt
Principal Architectural Historian
Associate Architectural Historian
Task Subtotal
Principal Architectural Historian
Associate Architectural Historian
Task Subtotal
55.00
40.50
95.50
10.00
48.00
58.00
$180.00
$360.00
$125.00
$875.00
$180.00
$9,900.00
$125.00
$5,062.50
$180.00 $1,800.00
$125.00 $6,000.00
$7,800.00
1.00
$180.00
4.50
$125.00
$1,235.00
$14,962.50
$180.00
$562.50
$742.50
Mileage -Billable expense 1.00 $19.50
Total Expenses: $192.50
Total Serv
ice: $29,807.50
Total Expenses: $792.50
Misc: $0.00