HomeMy Public PortalAbout2014-094 Resolution Approving Comp. Plan Amend. Mohawk Dr & Chippewa RdMember Pederson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO.2014-94
RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT REGARDING THE FUTURE LAND USE OF
PROPERTY AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF
MOHAWK DRIVE AND CHIPPEWA ROAD
WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the "City") is a municipal corporation, organized and
existing under the laws of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, Wilfred J. Cavanaugh Family Limited Partnership (the "Owner") is the fee
owner of property in the City of Medina at the northwest corner of Mohawk Drive and Chippewa
Road which has the property identification numbers 03-118-23-24-0003 according to the records
of Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Wealshire of Bloomington, LLC (the "Applicant") intends to purchase
a portion of the property and has requested approval from the City of a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to change the future land use of the Property from Low Density Residential to
General Business; and
WHEREAS, the planning commission held a duly called public hearing on
November 12, 2014 where testimony was heard from all interested parties and following the
hearing recommended approval of the amendment, subject to certain terms and conditions; and
WHEREAS, on December 2, 2014, the city council reviewed the amendment,
considered the recommendations of the planning commission, reviewed materials prepared by
staff, and heard comments from interested parties; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment has no practical impact on the City's population
forecasts or Traffic Assignment Zone allocations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city council of the City of Medina,
Minnesota, that the Comprehensive Plan amendment as identified in Exhibit A, attached hereto,
is hereby approved, subject to the following terms and conditions:
1) Approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment shall be subject to Metropolitan
Council review and approval.
2) The Amendment shall not take effect until formally adopted by the City following
Metropolitan Council approval. Such adoption shall be contingent upon approval by the
Resolution No. 2014-94
December 16, 2014
City of such applications which are necessary for the construction of a memory care
facility described by the Applicant.
3) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for
the cost of reviewing the proposed amendment and the cost of taking such other actions
as are necessary to effectuate the proposed amendment.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that city staff is authorized to submit the amendment
of the Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council for review.
Dated: December 16, 2014.
ATTEST:
Scott T. Johnso City Administrator -Clerk
istrator-Clerk
§720/(1/,--‘.
ElizzbhWeir, Mayor
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Anderson
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Anderson, Martin, Martinson, Pederson, Weir
And the following voted against same:
None
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 2014-94 2
December 16, 2014
Exhibit A
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Proposed Amendment to Map 5-2: change Future Land Use designation of the Property as
shown below.
3
CPIE,TMIr
Property proposed to be Amended to General Business
from Low Density Residential (21 gross acres, 16 net acres
e�i�ai��p
,
INVAlO
wouvi �..----
f xory xm-
_ colr_r xono a.
I r.
Map 5.2
Future Land Use Plan
,.r .•
f0,14
MEDINA
Guide Plan
Rural Residential
- AgrIGAWre
Dft-doo g-Post 2030
Low Density Res 2.0 - 3.49 U/A
EE Medan Density Res 3.5 - 6.99 U/A
MI High Density Res 7 - 30 U/A
_ !Axed Use 3.5 - 6 99 U/A
_ NLxed Use - Busness 7 .45 U/A
Commercial
▪ General Business
industrial Business
Pnvate RecreabDn (PREC)
_ Parks and Recreation
- P-R - State or Regonal
Open Space
- Public Semi -Public 0 U/A
,._..�; Closed Sanitary Landfill
Right -or -Way
-The map a not perfectly owls*.
Awal boundanes may vary, and
should to raid ven6sd.
Last Amended. it-it-ege (CPA 20305)
Adopted: November 17, 2009
UTM. Zone 15N, NAD 83
Scale 1-.30,000
Resolution No. 2014-94 3
December 16, 2014
Proposed Amendment to Table 5-B: delete the strie-lten text and insert the underlined text as
shown below.
TABLE 5-B
Future Land Use Plan
Land Use Designation
Agricultural (AG.) ..............................._.
Rural Residential (RR)
Low Density Residential (LDR)
Medium Density Residential (MDR)
High Density Residential (HDR)
Mixed Use (MU)
Mixed Use - Business (MU-B)
Developing Post-2030
............................................................................................................................................................
Commercial (C)
General Business (GB)
Industrial (IB)
Closed Sanitary Landfill (SL)
Public Semi -Public (PSP)
Parks and Recreation
Parks and Recreation - Regional or State
Private Recreation (PREC)
Open Space (OS)
Rights -of -Way
Lakes
Wetlands and Floodplains
Gross Area
Net Area
Acres Percent Acres Percent
251
7,835
944-N3
451
................................
123
................................
338
59
444.._--
- 427......-
559 580
68
1.4%
192 1.1%
271 1.6%
93 0.5%
2,519 14.5%
358 2.1%
208 1.2%
912 5.1%
1,283 ..............._...................7.4 %..
180
................................
4,982
630 614
307
103
234
173 1.0%
46 0.3%
1,528
.....................
272
153
912 5.1%
1,283 7.4%
.....................................................................
5,335 30.8%
Total City
17,335
17,335
Resolution No. 2014-94 4
December 16, 2014
Proposed Amendment to Table 5-C and Table 5-D: delete the Or -Mien text and insert the
underlined text as shown below.
TABLE 5-C
Net Residential Density
(Assuming Lowest of Density Range)
Land Use
# of Units
Gross
Acres
Acres
Undevelopablei
Net Acres
Commercial
Net Acres
Residential
Net Density
(UnitslAcre)
A
B
C
D
E=B-(C+D)
A I E
Existing LDR
486
346
55
291
1.7
Existing MDR
497
181
17
164
3.0
Existing HDR
140
17
2
15
9.3
Future LDR
678 646
598 577
259 254
�9 323
2.0
Future MDR
501
270
126
143
3.5
Future HDR
616
106
18
88
7.0
Future MU2
408
338
105
116
1162
3.5
Future MU-B3
273
59
20
393
7.0
TOTAL
3,599-3,567
1,915.1,89.4
602 597
116
1,197 1s181
3.01
1 Acres Undevelopable include wetlands, floodplains, and steep slope
2 The Mixed Use (MU) land use requires residential units equ valent to the minimum density over at least half of the developable area
3 The Mixed Use -Business MU-B land use requires residential units equivalent to the minimum density over the entire developable area
TABLE 5-D
Net Residential Density
(Assuming Middle of Density Range)
Land Use
# of Units
Gross
Acres
Acres
Undevelopable)
Net Acres
Commercial
Net Acres
Residential
Net Density
(UnitslAcre)
A
B
C
D
E=B-(C+D)
A 1 E
Existing LDR
486
346
55
291
1.7
Existing MDR
497
181
17
164
3.0
Existing HDR
140
17
2
15
9.3
Future LDR
94-5 872
598 577
259 254
3-3-9 323
2.7
Future MDR
715
270
126
143
5.0
Future HDR
880
106
18
88
10.0
Future MU2
580
338
105
116
1162
5.0
Future MU-B3
390
59
20
393
10.0
TOTAL
4403 4.560
1,9151,894
602-597
116
1,1971.181
3.85
1 Acres Undevelopable
2 The Mixed Use (MU)
3 The Mixed Use Business
include wetlands,
land use requires
(MU-B) land use
floodplains, and steep
residential units equivalent
requires residential
slope
to the minimum density
units equivalent to the minimum
over at least half of the
density over the
developable area
entire developable area
Resolution No. 2014-94
December 16, 2014
5
Proposed Amendment to Table 5-F: delete then text and insert the underlined text
as shown below.
Table 5-F
Land Use in 5-Year Increments
Land Use Designation
Residential Uses
-Rural Residential 2.5 acres or less
-Rural Residential 2.5 -10 acres
-Rural Residential 10-40 acres
- Rural Residential 40+ acres
-Agricultural 40+ acres
...................................
Subtotal Unsewered
Low Density Residential (LDR)
Medium Density Residential (MDR)
High Density Residential (HDR)
Mixed Use (MU)2
Mixed Use - Business (MU-B)3
Future Developing Areas
Commercial Uses
Commercial (C)
Allowed Density
Ranges
Min
1 U/10A
1 U/40A
1 U/40A
Max
General Business (GB)
Industrial (IB)
Existing
2008
..................
(acres)
2010
2015
acres) (acres
.........................:.........................
212 I 212
2197 I 2207 2217 2227
2020 I 2025
acres) (acres)
212 212
3591 3661 3691
1835 1755 1715
I 251 251 251
8086 8086 I 8086 8086
3.49 1 346 ; 600 j 713 1 9-
.—.__......_.... 890
3.5 6.9 I 181 326 451 I451
l..........................................i................................._.................._..._....._..............___
7 . 30 17 21 21 I 21
3.5 6.9 0 80 166 ' 166
7 45 1
.................... 59 59).............59.........._(_._....59
3721
1675
251 251
8086 18086
444 944
923 923
451 I 451
21 123
239
2030
acres
...............
212
2237 I
1 U/1 OA i_._- 2501.............� 1954 I 1372 I 982 771
)
1635
%Change
2010-2030
57
54%
38%
....................
486%
338 I 323%
59 0%
444 -77%
256 349 380 I 380 427
92 92 214 i 375 I 4813 I 458
396 ' 501 579 529%
25 ' 25 68 68 I 68 68
67%
Institutional Uses
Public Semi -Public (PSP)
Parks and Recreation
Parks and Recreation —
Regional/State
Private Recreation (PREC)
Open Space (OS)
Closed Sanitary Landfill (SL)
271 271
93 93
2519 2519
_............................1...........................
358 r 358
208 208
192 192
......................................
271 I 271
93 I 93
2519 2519
358
208
..............
192
358
208
..............
192 192
271 ; 271 I 0%
93 93
2519 ' 2519
0%
0%
358 I 358 0%
208 208 0%
.192 0%
Right -of -Ways
Lakes
..................................................................................................
Wetlands and Floodplains
Total City
912
' To be determined later for cluster/open-space developments. Density in excess of one unit per ten acres will not be allowed within
Metropolitan Council's long term sewer service area.
2 This land use require a minimum 50% of the developable property includes a residential component within the density range
3 The Mixed Use -Business (MU-B) land use requires residential units equivalent to the minimum density over the entire developable area. The
MU-B "Existing 2008" acreage is based on the approximate area which has been developed consistent with the Objectives of the MU-B land
use.
Resolution No. 2014-94 6
December 16, 2014