HomeMy Public PortalAbout13) 10A Temple City High School focused traffic engineering analysisAGENDA
ITEM 1 O.A.
MANAGEMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 6, 2018
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Bryan Cook, City Manager
By: Bryan Ariizumi, Public Safety Supervisor
SUBJECT: TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL FOCUSED TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
ANALYSIS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD
AND LEMON AVENUE AND TRELAWNEY AVENUE AND LEMON
AVENUE
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council is requested to:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 18-5361 (Attachment "A"), approving the traffic and
pedestrian safety measures recommended by the Transportation and Public
Safety Commission; and
2. Approve a budget amendment in the amount of $36 ,000 to implement the
approved traffic and pedestrian safety measures.
BACKGROUND:
1. On December 8, 2017, during the "Lights on Temple City Event", the Youth
Committee conducted a pedestrian safety survey to obtain feedback from the
community on what locations the city should focus on for traffic improvements
affecting all modes of transportation (i.e., walking, cycling, and driving).
2. On December 14, 2017, the Youth Committee hosted a "Quality of Life Pop-Up
Event" to resume discussing concerns residents expressed at the Lights of Temple
City Event.
3. On January 24, 2018, the Youth Committee provided a presentation to the
Transportation and Public Safety Commission regarding pedestrian and traffic
safety that focused on traffic issues at the intersections of Lemon Avenue at
Temple City Boulevard and Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue . The
Commission directed staff to work with the City's contract traffic engineer
(Transtech) and the Youth Committee to discuss the concerns and options for the
two intersections and return to the Commission with recommended improvements .
City Council
November 6, 2018
Page 2 of 5
4 . On February 22, 2018 , Transtech hosted a workshop for the Youth Committee and
discussed traffic engineering report preparation and thresholds for implementation
as found in the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD)
or the California Vehicle Code (CVC). The Youth Committee introduced some
proposed traffic and pedestrian safety measures and discussed the requirements
and potential effects of the proposed improvements. Following the discussion City
staff directed Transtech to conduct a traffic analysis of existing conditions and
potential traffic improvements around Temple City High School.
5 . On March 15, 2018, Transtech conducted a 24-hour traffic volume count on
Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue and a 24-hour radar speed survey on
Lemon Avenue .
6. On April 5, 2018, Transtech and Youth Committee members conducted
pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular turning movement counts at the intersections of
Lemon Avenue at Temple City Boulevard and Lemon Avenue at Trelawney
Avenue.
7 . On May 4, 2018, Transtech prepared a report (Attachment "B") presenting the
results and recommendations of their traffic engineering analysis.
8. On June 13 , 2018, at its regularly scheduled meeting , the Transportation and
Public Safety Commission reviewed the focused traffic engineering analysis
prepared by Transtech and recommend that it be brought before the City Council
for review and approval.
ANALYSIS:
As part of the traffic engineering analysis, traffic speeds, field review, accident history,
and pedestrian, bicyclist and vehicular traffic volumes were used to assess exiting
conditions on Lemon Avenue , Trelawney Avenue and Temple City Boulevard.
Transtech 's report provides details about the data collected , their findings and their
recommendations . The following is a brief summary of the report that was reviewed by
the Transportation and Public Safety Commission on June 13, 2018:
• Lemon Avenue is considered a local roadway with a posted speed limit of 30
mph. It is approximately 38' (feet) in width with one lane in each direction
separated by a dashed yellow center line.
• Temple City Boulevard is considered a primary roadway with a posted speed
limit of 35 mph. It is approximately 64' (feet) in width with two lanes in each
direction with left turn pockets.
• Trelawney Avenue is considered local residential roadway with a prima facie
speed limit of 25 mph. It is approximately 38 ' (feet) in width with one lane in
each direction separated by a dashed yellow center line.
City Council
November 6 , 2018
Page 3 of 5
• The intersection of Temple City Boulevard and Lemon Avenue is signalized with
yellow ladder crosswalks in all legs . The intersection of Trelawney Avenue and
Lemon Avenue is stop controlled in the south leg with yellow ladder crosswalks
in the south and east legs.
• A radar speed survey showed that traffic travelling along Lemon Avenue were
driving at/or around the posted speed limit of 30 mph. This indicates that 85% of
the vehicles sampled were travelling at 32 mph or lower.
• Accident Data showed that between 2012 and 2018, there was one recorded
accident at Lemon Avenue and Trelawney, 18 accidents at Lemon Avenue and
Temple City Boulevard , and three reported accidents that occurred mid-block on
Lemon Avenue between Temple City Boulevard and Oak Avenue.
• Installation of protected left turn phasing for all directions at Lemon Avenue and
Temple City Boulevard and All-Way stop control at Lemon Avenue and
Trelawney Avenue did not meet warrants for installation.
Based on the findings of the traffic engineering analysis, Transtech recommends that
the following traffic control measures be implemented which are gu ided by the
California Manual Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD):
Lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard (page 23 of Attachment "B")
• Install "stay back lines" I "yield lines" approaching all crosswalks ;
• Install pedestrian push buttons for pedestrians crossing north and south ,
matching the style of the existing east/west crossing push buttons ;
• Install updated push button signage at all push buttons; and
• Increase time for pedestrians to cross at Temple City Boulevard with pedestrians
crossing a few seconds before vehicles are given a green.
Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue (pages 24 & 25 of Attachment "B ")
Transtech is presenting two options for traffic and pedestrian safety improvements at
the intersection of Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue.
• Option 1 : Leave the existing crosswalk in the east leg and install improvements
for increased line of sight. These improvements include the following:
o Outline the existing yellow ladder crosswalk in the south leg and the east
leg with highly reflective yellow raised pavement markers (RPM);
o Install shark teeth yield lines 30-feet in advance of the crosswalk for
westbound and eastbound travelers ;
o Install corresponding "YIELD HERE FOR PEDS" signs (R1 -5) adjacent to
proposed yield lines for westbound and eastbound travelers;
o Install a "stay back line" I "yield line" approaching the south leg crosswalk;
o Install Double Sided Pedestrian Activated Flashing Beacons on top of
existing Pedestrian crossing signs;
o Purchase two new YIELD to pedestrian in -road signs (R1-6b) to be placed
at each crosswalk by school staff during school hours ;
City Council
November 6 , 2018
Page 4 of 5
o Install approximately 52' of red curb west of the crosswalk and 70' of red
curb east of the crosswalk on the north side and south sides of Lemon
Avenue;
o Install 20' of red curb from the base of the curb ramp on the east and west
sides of Trelawney Avenue; and
o Construct a larger landing pad for pedestrians to wait to cross by
expanding the curb return with a mini bulb out or larger paved waiting
area.
• Option 2: Remove the existing east leg crosswalk and install a new crosswalk in
the west leg to better accommodate the large number of students using the
crosswalk coming from the west side of Trelawney Avenue. There is a la rger
landing pad area and sidewalks leading up to the ramp. Th is option will also
reduce the number of vehicle movements crossing over the crosswalk , th ereby
reducing the conflict with pedestrians in the crosswalk. The fo llowing
improvements would have to be implemented for this option:
o Full removal of the existing east leg crosswalk (sand blast);
o Removal of all pedestrian signage/posts;
o Reconstruction of the existing east leg curb ramp on t he north side of
Lemon Avenue to a regular curb;
o Install a new yellow ladd er stripped crosswalk in the west leg;
o Construct a new ADA compliant curb ramp with truncated domes on the
north side of Lemon Avenue ;
o Install pedestrian signage removed from the east leg crosswalk ;
o Install Double Sided Pedestrian Activated Flashing Beacons on top of
Pedestrian crossing s igns ;
o Outline the existing yellow ladder crosswalk in the south leg and the new
yellow ladder crosswalk in th e west leg with hig hly reflective yellow raised
pavement marke rs (RPM);
o Install shark t eeth yield lines 30-feet in advance of the crosswa lk for
westbound and eastbound travelers;
o Install corresponding "YIELD HERE FOR PEDS" signs (R1-5) adjacent to
proposed yield lin es for westbound and eastbound travelers;
o In sta ll a "stay back line" I "yield lin e" approaching the south leg crosswalk;
o Purchase two new YIELD to pedestrian in-road signs (R1-6b) to be placed
at each crosswalk by school staff during school hours;
o Install approximately 70 ' of red curb west of the new west leg crosswalk
and 76' of red curb east of the new west leg crosswalk on the north side
and south sides of Lemon Avenue; and
o Install 20' of red curb from the base of the curb ramp on the east and west
sides of Trelaw ney Avenue.
The Transportation and Public Safety Comm ission considered the proposed traffic and
pedestrian safety improvements at the two intersections and, by a 3-2 vote, selected
Option 1 for the intersect ion of Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue. Per Section 2-
6E -7 of the Temple City Municipal Code, the T ransportation and Public Safety
City Council
November 6, 2018
Page 5 of 5
Commission "shall receive and investigate citizen complaints pertaining to vehicular
traffic and pedestrian safety concerns , and when deemed necessary by the
commission, report the commission's findings and recommendations to the City
Council." The Commission is recommending that the City Council approve the
recommended measures, which are described in a report prepared by Transtech.
The Temple City Unified School District (TCUSD) and Temple City High School (TCHS)
administration reviewed the proposed traffic and pedestrian safety improvements at the
two intersections and have no objections or recommendations. They also stated that
they would prefer implementation of Option 2 for the intersection of Lemon Avenue and
Trelawney Avenue.
CITY STRATEGIC GOALS:
Implementation of the traffic and pedestrian safety measures around Temple City High
School furthers the City's Strategic Goal of Public Health and Safety.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Transtech estimates the cost for improvements for Lemon Avenue at 1) Temple City
Boulevard and at 2) Trelawney Avenue (Option 1) is about $36,000. The estimated
cost for improvements for Lemon Avenue at 1) Temple City Boulevard and at 2)
Trelawney Avenue (Option 2) is about $44,000.
If the City Counci l approves Option 1, a budget amendment in the amount of $36,000
wi ll be necessary as funds have not been appropriated in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-19
City Budget.
If Option 2 is selected, a public hearing will need to be schedu led for the removal of the
east leg crosswa lk at Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue. During the pub lic
hearing, City Counci l can approve the proposed traffic and pedestrian safety
improvements, along with a budget amendment.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution No. 18-5361
B. Transtech Report dated May 4, 2018
ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION N0.18-5361
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE
CITY APPROVING THE TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
MEASURES AT LEMON AVENUE AND TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD
AND LEMON AVENUE AND TRELAWNEY AVENUE
WHEREAS, The City Council recognizes residents and business owners in the City may be
impacted by excess motor vehicle traffic and parking congestion;
WHEREAS, Divis ion 11, Chapter 9, Section 22507, subsection "A" of the California Vehicle Code
authorizes local authorities to prohibit or restrict the stopping , parking, or standing of vehicles on certain
streets or portions thereof, during all or certain hours of the day;
WHEREAS, the proposed traffic and pedestrian safety measures are consistent w ith all local,
state and federal regulations .
WHEREAS, the traffic and pedestrian safety improvements will he lp ensure t he safety of motorists
and pedestrians around Temple City High School.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DOES RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Public Safety Supervisor is hereby authorized to remove, erect or ins tall the
following signage or other appropriate markings at the intersections of Lemon Ave nue and T emple City
Boulevard and Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue:
Lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard
a) lnstall "stay back lines" /"yield line" approaching all crosswalks in each leg;
b) Install pedestrian push buttons for pedestrians crossing north and south , making sure to
match the existing style of the existing push buttons for the east/west crosswalks;
c) Install updated push button signage at all push buttons; and
d) Increase the t ime for pedestrians to cross Temple City Bouleva rd with pedestrians
c ross ing a few seconds before vehic les are given a green li ght.
Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue
a) Outline the existing yellow ladd er crosswalk in the south leg and the east leg with highly
refl ective yellow raised pavement markers (RPM);
b) Install shark teeth yield lin es 30-feet in advance of t he crosswa lk for westbound and
eastbound travelers;
c) Install corresponding "YIELD HERE FOR PEDS" signs (R1 -5) adjacent to proposed yie ld
lines for westbound and eastbound travelers;
d) Install a "stay back line" /"yie ld line" approach ing the south leg crosswalk;
e) In stall Double Sided Pedestrian Activated Flashing Beacons on top of existing Pedestrian
cross ing signs;
f) Purchase two new YIELD to pedestrian in-road s igns (R1-6b) to be placed at each
cro sswalk by school staff during school hours ;
g) Insta ll approximately 52 ' of red cu rb west of the crosswalk and 70' of red curb east of the
crosswalk on the north side and south sides of Lemon Avenue;
h) Install 20' of red curb from the base of the cu rb ramp on the east and west sides of
Trelawney Avenue ; and
i) Construct a larger landing pad for pedestrians to wait to cross by expandi ng the cu rb
return with . a mini bulb out or larger paved waiting area.
Resolution No. 18-5361
Page2
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution .
PASSED, APPROVED , AND ADOPTED on this 6th day of November 2018
William Man , Mayor
ATTEST:
Peggy Kuo, City Clerk
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution, Resolution No. 18 -5361, was duly passed , approved
and adopted by the City Council of the City of Temple City at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of
November 2018 , by the following vote :
AYES :
NOES :
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN :
Councilmember-
Councilmember-
Councilmember-
Councilmember-
Peggy Kuo, City Clerk
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
TRANSTECh
City ofTemple City
Transportation & Public Safety Commission
Temple City Youth Committee
Transtech Engineers, Inc.
May 4, 2018
ATTACHMENT 8
SUBJECT: TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL FOCUSED TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AT THE
INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT {1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2)
TRELAWNEY AVENUE
INTRODUCTION
On behalf of the City of Temple City, and at the request of the Temple City Youth Committee and direction
from the Temple City Transportation and Public Safety Commission, Transtech Engineers, In c. has
completed a traffic analysis and circulation study around Temple City High School focusing on the
intersections of (1) Lemon Avenue at Temple City Boulevard and (2) Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue.
This study evaluates and recommends various traffic measures to improve overall vehicular and
pedestrian safety based on field observations, data collection, California Manual Of Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (CAMUTCD) guidelines, and the California Vehicle Code (CVC). Please refer to Figure 1:
Vicinity Map of Study Area below.
Figure 1: Vicinity Map of Subject Intersections
LEGEND
r.\ Lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard
\:J • Signalized Intersection
Marked crosswalks in all legs
Crosswalks are yellow ladder striped
Lemon Avenue is a local roadway
Temple City Boulevard is cla ss ified as a
Primary road
• Lemon Avenue Posted Speed Limit : 30 mph
with 25 mph school zone
• Temple City Boulevard Posted Speed Limit: 35
mph with 25 mph schoo l zone
0 Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue
Stop controlled in t he south leg (SL)
Marked crosswa lks in south leg (SL) and east
leg (EL)
Crosswa lks are yellow ladder striped
Trelawney Ave is a residential roadway
Trelawney Ave Prima Facie Speed Limit: 25
mph
D Temple City High School
D City of Temple City Border
~ CITY OF TEMPLE CITY ~·-------~
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 1 of 34 •
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYS IS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE
BACKGROUND
On behalf of the City of Temple City, Transtech Engineers, In c. (Traffic Engineering Consultant Staff) has
collaborated with the Temple City Youth Committee as well as the Transportation and Public Safety
Commission to promote Pedestrian, Cyclist, and Driver Safety at various City events, commission
meetings, and workshops. Thi s included brochure handouts w ith safety information for the different
roadway users (Pedestrians, Cycl ists, and Drivers), surveys distributed to t he community to identify traffic
concerns around the City, and a traffic engineering workshop focu sed on various aspects of traffic
engineering when evaluating an ar ea for improvements. The following is a summary lis t of the various
events that were hosted collaborative ly between Temple City Yout h Committee, Temple City
Transportation and Public Safety Commission, and Tran stech Engineers, Inc. focused on Pedestrian,
Cyc li st, and Driver Safety:
lights on Temple City Event (December 8, 2017)
On Frida y, December 8, 2017, the City held t heir annual tree lighting event known as "Lights on Temple
City" at Temple City Park on La s Tunas Drive. The Temple City Youth Committee hosted a booth that
focused on ped es trian safety and included surveys for the community to fill out related to the types of
traffic improvements they wou ld like to see around the City, their frequency of using different modes of
transportation (walking, cycling, driving), and other traffic related question s. Transtec h staff also attended
and assisted by passing out Pedestrians, Cyclists, and Drivers Safety brochures to the community.
Quality of life Pop-Up Event (December 14, 2017)
On Thursday, December 14, 2017, the Temple City Youth Committee hosted a Quality of Life Pop-Up event
at the Temple City Library. Tran stec h staff, Schoo l District Staff, Sherriff, and others part icip ated in an
open discussion pane l about the meaning of traffic safety, perso nal experiences with traffic and potential
improvements that cou ld be made in the City. All participants expressed what types of improvements
they wou ld like to see around the City and the Temple City High School area. Some of the topics discussed
included cell phon e use whi le walking, cyclists not being aware of the road rules, traffic signal wait t i mes,
and speeding.
Temple City Transportation and Public Safety Commission Meeting (January 24, 2018)
To continue the theme and based on comm unity feedback from the two prior events of Pedestrian, Cyclist,
and Driver Safety, two presentations were given at the Transportation and Public Safety Commission
Meeting. The first was given by Transtech staff relating to the various rules and roles official traffic con t rol
plays on roads from a Pedestri an, Cyclist, and Drive r standpoint which i nclu ded safety tips.
The second presentation was given by the Temple City Youth Committee based on feedback they received
from the community . The presentation focused around Temp le City High Sc hool, specifica lly at the
i ntersections of (1) Lemon Avenue at Temple City Boulevard and (2) Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue.
At that time t he Transportation and Pub lic Safety Commission Meeting directed traffic engineering staff
to meet separately with the Youth Committee to go over the preferred study area.
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 2 of 34
TEMPLE CITY HIG H SCH OOL TRAFFIC ANALYSI S FOCUSED AT TH E INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVE NUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CI TY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWN EY AVENU E
Temple City Youth Committee Workshop (February 22, 2018)
At the direction of City Staff and Temple City Tran spo rtation and Public Safety Comm ission , Transtech
staff hosted a works hop w ith the Temple City Youth Comm ittee go in g over the specific traffic concerns
that they brough t up at prior events re garding th e area around Te mple City High Schoo l.
The workshop highlighted what goes into preparing a traffic engineerin g report and th e various items that
recommendations are based on such as ex ist in g conditions, traffic counts, f ie ld observations , acci de nt
history, etc. The workshop was also an open discu ss ion and revi ewed the possible options/projects
addressing th e co nce rns th e youth co mmittee had aro und Temple City High School. The goal of the
works hop was to narrow the poss ible improvem en t s that (1) the City woul d fina nci ally be able to
undertake and (2) potentially meet thresholds for implementation as found in the CAM UTCD o r eve, and
{3) improve th e overall sa f ety of th e main intersection around t he sc hool. Some of the measures
introduced by the Youth Committee were; a rais ed crosswa lk at Tre lawney Avenue, stree t narrowing o n
Temple City Blvd, signal improvements to protect pedestrians at the Temple City Boulevard and Lemo n
Avenue intersection as well as parking changes around t he a rea to improve visibility of pedestrians on
Lemon Ave nu e. From there the City directed engineering consultin g staff to co nduct a t raffic analysis of
existing conditions a nd potential traffic i mproveme nts.
Traffic Count Collection (April 5, 2018)
Due to weather constraints and sc heduling around spring break, ped es t r ian and ve hi cular traffic counts
and fi e ld obse rva tions were co ll ected Thursday, April 5, 2018. Students part of the Te mple City Youth
Committee also p arti ci pated in th e co unts. The counts were taken at t he following times and loca t ions:
Count Times :
1. AM Count: 6:45AM-8:45AM (2 hour count)
2. AFT Cou nt: 1:45PM -3 :30PM {1.5 hour count)
3. PM Count: 4:0 0PM-5:3 0PM {1.5 hour count)
Count Location s:
1. Lem o n Avenue and Temp le City Boulevard
2. Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Ave nue
ANALYSIS
Existing Conditions Assessment: The City directed Traffic Eng ineeri ng Consu lting st aff to conduct an
assessment of existing co nditions and come up with recommendat io ns that would allev iate traffic
congestion and improve ped es trian safet y during the peak AM d rop -off, AFT pic k-up t i mes, and PM
commute times around Templ e City High Schoo l focu sing on the follow in g t wo intersecti o ns:
1. Lemon Avenue and Temple City Bo ulevard
2. Lem o n Aven ue and Trelawney Aven ue
Communiti es often t ai lor a combination of st rategies including engi neering, enforcement, education, and
encouragement to address specifi c needs of each sc hool as well as other stakeholders. In o rder t o come
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transt ech Engineers, Inc. I Pag e 3 of 34
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOO L TRAFF IC ANALYS IS FOCUSED AT TH E INTERSECT IONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1) TE MPLE CI TY BOULEVA RD A ND AT (2) TR ELA WNEY AVENU E
up w ith t h e mos t appropriat e and su ita bl e so lutio n it is i mpo rtant t o ide ntif y the root cause of t he issue.
Th e deve lo pme nt of a success ful sc ho o l ci rcula ti o n p r ogra m re q ui res comm un it y support an d i np ut as
we ll as t h e su ppo rt of school d is t r ict re prese ntatives and deci sio n m ake rs t o ensure t hat all st akeholders
ar e r eprese nted. W hi le schoo l traffi c d uring pea k dro p-off and pick-up t i mes is unavo id ab le, ther e are
mitigatio n meas ures that can be i mple me nted to ease t he traffi c conges tio n a nd im p rove the safet y and
circul at ion of t he area. It is al so im po rta nt to edu ca t e commun it y membe rs of the t ype of mitigation
meas ures th at a re appropriat e and w hy o t he r improve me nts may not be success f u l fo r this pa rt i cu lar
sce na r io.
Stree t s se rve mu ltiple users and mod es of transpo rtatio n including passe nge r ca rs, pedestrians, bicyc les,
bu ses, and Emerge ncy Serv ice v ehicles. As a res ult, m eas ures use d t o affec t t he way vehicles ope rate o n
a stree t may also affect othe r use rs. Pote nt ial impacts t o oth er mo des of t rave l needs t o be co nsid ered t o
m in i mize o r preve nt un i nte nd ed co nse qu ences. Please r ef er t o the Fig ure 2 below f o r a deta i led ex isting
con d it ions d i ag ram .
LEGEND
0 Lemon Avenue and Tem pl e City Bo ulev ar d
• Signalized Inter sec t ion
• Mark ed crosswa l ks in all legs
• Crosswal ks are ye llow lad der striped
• Lemon Aven ue is a loca l roadway
• Temple City Bo ul evard is classifi ed as a
Primary road
• Lemon Aven ue Post ed Sp ee d Li mit: 30
m p h
• Temple City Bo u levard Posted Speed
Li mit: 35 m ph
Q Lem o n Aven u e and Trelawney Aven ue A
• St op controll ed i n the south leg (SL) ~
• Marked cr osswa l ks in south leg (SL) and east leg (EL)
• Crosswa l ks are yellow ladder striped
• Trelawney Ave is a residentia l r oadway
• Trel awney Ave Pr i ma Facie Speed Li mi t: 25 mph
Lemon Ave b etwee n Oak A ve an d Temple City Blvd:
Posted speed limit sig ns:
• 30 m p h (Fo r EB
travel o nly)
• 25 mph school sign
(Both directio ns)
Paveme nt l egends:
• "S LOW SC HOO L XI NG" l ege n ds (Both
di r ections)
• Sha re t he Road Bicycle l egends (Both
di r ections)
• SW24-3 "AHEAD" signs appr oaching
crosswa l k i n EL
lemon Aven ue : l emo n Ave nu e is a pp r ox i mate ly 38' (feet) i n width w ith one lane i n each direct ion a nd a
d as hed ye ll ow ce nter l i ne. On t he no rth si de of lemon Ave nu e is Te mple Ci t y Hig h School. lemon Avenue
has a pos t ed sc hoo l spee d li m it sig n of 25 MP H f or wes tbound and eas t bound trave l ers as well as a speed
l imit sign of 30 MPH f o r eas tbo und trave lers o nly. Alo ng th e north si d e of l e mon Avenue, e nteri ng lemon
Ave nu e fro m Te m ple City Bou levard is approx im at e ly 50-feet of r eg u lar curb space with a posted sign that
rea ds "1 HOUR PARKIN G 7:0 0AM -5:0 0P M". Preceding th e re g ul ar curb space with pa r ki ng r est r ict io ns
of 1-ho ur is inte rmitte nt wh ite cu rb w ith parkin g signs of "3 M I N LO ADI NG ZO NE 7:00AM to 5:00 PM" o n
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Pr epa r ed By: T ra nstech Engi neer s, Inc. I Page 4 of 34
TEMPLE CI TY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFF IC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE I NTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1) T EMPLE CI TY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE
sc hoo l days. Wes t of the school parki ng lot , t he parking co nd itions then ch ange to "NO PARKING 7:00AM
-5:00PM SC HOO L DAYS" w itho ut a perm it. Park i ng conditions along the south side of Lemon Avenue are
"NO PARKING 7:00AM -5:00PM SCHOO L DAYS" without a pe r m it. Lemon Ave nue at Trelawney Avenue
is stop contr o ll ed on ly in t he sou th leg and uncont ro ll ed i n the east leg. During 7:30-9:00AM and 2:00-
3:30PM o n School days the NB left t u rn movement is prohibited. There is only perm it parking a lo ng
Tre lawney Aven u e o n sc hoo l d ays 7:00AM-5:00PM.
At Temp le City Bou levard and Lemon Ave nue, t h e i ntersect io n is signali zed wit h yellow ladder crosswa lks
in all legs. A lo ng Lemon Ave nue be t ween Temp le City Bo ul evard a nd Oak Avenue, there are school SW24-
3 "AHEAD" signs wit h "SLOW SCHOOL XING" legends oppos ite the signs approaching the crosswa lk on the
east leg at th e i ntersection w it h Tre lawney Avenue. There is additional signage and legends informing
road users to share t he road with bicyclists and pedes t rians. Lemon Avenue has no sidewalks along the
south side of t he roadway bet ween Temple City Boulevard and Oak Avenue. Land use is comprised of
si ngle-f amily homes and pu bl ic faci li ties. On the northwest co rn e r of Lemon Avenue and Temple City
Boulevard is the Temple City High School.
Fi gure 4: Stree t vi ew of the exi sting y ellow ladder crossw al ks outlined w ith RPM 's in all l egs at t h e
inter section of l emon Avenu e at Templ e City Blvd {WB Directi o n).
~ CITY OF TEMPL E CITY ~:------~------~ Prepa red By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 5 of 34 •
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENU E AT
(1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE
Figure 5 : Street view of lemon Avenue toward s Trelawney Avenue (WB Direction ). School st aff places
cones in the street school hours.
~-----------------.~--~--------------~
Figure 6: Existing yellow ladder cross walks in the south and east leg at th e intersecti on of lemon Avenue at
Trel awney Avenue (WB Direction). School staff pl aces cones and in-road pedestrian signs before sc hool and
picks up after sc hool let out.
Figure 7: Street view of lemon Avenue towards Trelawney Avenue (EB Di rection). Bu ses park along lemon
Ave for after school ort teams.
Figure 8: Exi sting Parking Conditions Along lemon Avenue between Temple City Blvd and Oak Ave -The No
Parkin g signs also had a "without permit" below which indicates residents are allowed to park on the
street ins
CITY OF T EMPLE CITY
Pr epared By: Transtech En gi nee r s, Inc. I Page 6 of 34
TEMPLE CIT Y HIGH SCHO OL TR AFF IC A NALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEM ON AVEN UE AT
(1 ) TEMPLE CITY BOUL EVARD AND AT (2) TRELAW NEY AVE NUE
Figure 9: Exi sting Parking Conditions Along lemon Avenue between Temple City Blvd and Oak Ave south
side and partially on north side-The No Parking sign s also have a "without permit" below whi ch indicates
residents are allowed to park on the street in specified area s.
PARKING PROHIBitlD
ON CITY STREETS
2AMT05AM
EXCEPT Qr PERMIT
Temple City Boulevard: Temple City Bo u leva r d is approxim at e ly 64' (f ee t) in width w ith two la nes in eac h
directi o n w ith left turn po ck ets. Th e po st e d spee d limit o n Templ e City Bou leva rd is 35 mph exce pt duri ng
sc ho o l ho urs a nd times . Th er e a r e t wo pos t ed sc hool sp eed limit sig ns f or nort hb ou n d a nd southb o u nd
trave le rs in a ddition to the 35 MPH spee d limit sign alo ng Te mple City Bo u levard. At this loca ti o n, Te m ple
City Bo ul eva rd is cl ass ified as a pr im a ry ro ad way w ith sin g le f amily hom es alo ng th e eas t sid e of the
roadwa y and publicfac iliti es alo ng th e w es t sid e of the roa dway. Wes t ofTemple City Bou levard is Temple
City Hig h Sc hoo l. Parkin g is p ermitted o n both sid es of t h e stree t i n marked spaces. All directions of the
sig nali ze d i nt ersec ti o n have pedes t r ian count down sig nals w ith a w hite pedestrian symbol i ndica t ing
pe d estria ns t o procee d changin g t o a f las hing han d w it h a t i me co unt. There ar e pedest ri an b uttons t o
activate t he cou ntd own o nl y f o r pedes tri ans cr ossing eas t t o west. The pedest rian signals for pedest ri ans
cross in g no rth t o so uth are automatic w ith no pedes trian bu tto ns. All directions of left tu rn traffic m ust
y ie ld t o o ncom i ng t r affic and is co nsid ere d as "pe rmitted" tim ing. Temp le Ci t y Bo u leva r d as a pr i mary
arte ri al is d esig ned t o carry a sig nifi ca nt amo unt of co mmuter traffic. By keep i ng t hrough traffic movin g
o r f lowing a lo ng t hese main arterials serves t o limit o r minimize cut-t hrough t ra ffic o nto adj ace nt
r es ide nti a I stree t s.
Figure 10: Street view of the existing yellow ladder cro sswalks outlined with RPM's in all l egs at the
intersection of Tem Blvd at Lemon Avenue ~~----~--~------~====--~
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Pr epared By: Tr anst ec h Engineers, Inc. I Page 7 of 34
TEMPLE CI TY HIGH SCH OOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED A T THE INTER SECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1) TEM PLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2} TRELAWNEY AVENUE
Figure 11 : Street view of the existing yellow l add er cross walks outlined with RPM 's in all legs at the
intersec tion of Temple City Blvd at Lemon Av enue (NB Direction). The placement of RPM 's along
crosswalks serves to increase nighttime visibil of crossing pedestrians.
Figure 12: Pedestrian Countdown
Box . Note: All school age
bicycl ist s rode on sidewalk. --.---...,
Figure 13: Push Button -Street
view of the existing pedestrian
signal and pedestrian buttons .
Figure 14: Parking Re striction
signage on Lemon Avenu e
Trelawney Avenue: T re lawney Ave nu e is approx imate ly 38' (feet) in width w ith one lane in each d irection
separated by a dashed ye ll ow center line. The intersection of Lemon Avenue and Tre lawney Avenue is
stop co ntro ll ed in the so uth leg (SL) w ith ye ll ow ladder st ri ped m arked crosswalks in the south leg (SL) and
east leg (EL). The eas t leg crosswa lk is uncontro ll ed. A cross in g guard was present during peak AM and
AFT hours. Trelawney Aven ue is a residential roadway with a prima facie speed limit of 25 mph . Lemon
Ave nu e at Tr elawney Aven u e is stop controlled on ly in the south leg. There are no sidewalks leading from
the curb return in the sou th east corner down Trelawney Avenue or on Lemon Avenue. No northbound
left turns are allowed f ro m Trelawney Ave nu e onto Le m on Avenue during peak schoo l hours (7:30AM to
9 :00AM and 2:00PM t o 3:30PM Sc hool Day s).
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Tra nst ec h Engineers, Inc. I Page 8 o f 34
TEMPLE CI TY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYS IS FOCUSED AT THE INTERS ECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CITY BOU LEVAR D AND AT (2) TRELAWN EY AVENUE
Figure 15: Street view of the existing yellow ladder crosswalks in the south an d east legs at l emon Avenue
and Tre Avenue (EB Dire
Fi g ure 16: Street view of the existing so utheast corner with narrow landing p ad for pedestria ns with no
sidewalks as well as the turn prohibition signs for NB left turners during peak school hou rs . NB Directi
Figure 17: Street view of the existing yellow ladder crosswalks in the south and east legs at lemon Avenue
and T~'31 ""''."""'"'
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Pr epared By: Tra nstech Engineers, Inc. I Page 9 of 34
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFI C ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT TH E INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1 ) TEMP LE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNE Y AVENUE
Figure 18: Street view of the existing yellow ladder crosswalk in the south leg at Lemon Avenue and
Trelawney Avenue (NB Direction). School staff places the in-road signs and cones in the AM and AFT hours
before the bell ri
Average Daily Traffic (ADT): Daily vehicle co unts we re co nducted to determine the ave r age daily traffic
o n a t ypica l weekday trave ling on Lemo n Ave nu e and Trel aw ney Avenue. Based on the 24-hou r t ube
co unts, Lemon Avenue has an ADT of 2,987 vehicles per day. Additionally, 24-hourtube co un ts were taken
o n Trelawney Avenu e. Trelawn ey Avenue ha s an ADT of 573 vehicles per day. Per th e Temple City Zo n ing
M ap, lan d use in the subje ct area is co nsidered sin gle-fam ily residential with pub l ic fa ci lities. ADTs were
co ll ec t ed on Thursday, M arch 15, 2018. Please refer t o Tab le 1: Average Daily Traffic (ADT).
Table 1: Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
Date Counts Collected: Thursday, March 15, 2018
Location Total Vehicles Per Day
Lemon Ave W/0 Tr elawney Ave 2,98 7
Tr elaw ney Ave S/0 Le mon Ave 57 3
Vehicle Peak Hour Turning Movement: To determine the amount of co nflicting and tu rn in g traffic that
occurs at th e interse ct ion s of (1) Le mo n Avenue at Temple City Boulevard and (2) Lemon Avenue at
T relawney Avenue. Turnin g move me nt co unts were co ndu cte d as fo llows:
Table 2: Vehicle Peak Hour Turning Movement Count Information
Count Date Count Time Count Locations
Thursday, 1. AM Co unt: 6:4 5AM-8:45AM (2 hour cou nt) 1. Lemo n Aven ue an d Temple
Apri l 5, 20 18 2. AFT Co unt: 1:45PM-3:30PM (1.5 ho ur cou nt) City Boulevard
3. PM Count: 4 :00PM -5:30PM (1.5 ho ur co unt) 2. Lemo n Avenue and
Trelawney Avenue
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Pr epa r ed By: Tran st ec h Eng in eers, Inc. I Page 10 of 34
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFI C AN A LYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS O F LEM ON A V ENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CI TY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY A V ENUE
Th e turning movement dia gram s belo w prese nt th e hi g hes t amount of traffic for eac h 1-ho u r st udy
pe riod . Th e hours for th e counts wer e t aken d urin g w hat is co nsidered as "indust r y st and ar d co unt times"
and refl ec t s commuter t raffi c as well as schoo l traffic ba sed on the school st a rt and e nd times.
FIGURE 19-A FIGURE 19-B FIGURE 19-C
Turning Movement Diagrams
~ Temple City Blvd & Lemon Ave
7:45 a.m. to 8:45a.m.
Turning Movement Diagrams
~
Turning Movement Diagrams
Temple City Blvd & Lemon Ave Temple City Blvd & Le mon Ave
13:45 t o 14:45 16:00 t o 17:00
0 M
"-86
0 M M
rl lO N
)~\.. c 103 r4 6
Ol
"-31
00
"--29
M MOl Ol
"' lON lllO .....
)~\.. "' rl <t
c 37 )~~ c 27 r 19 r 10
------
50 _} )f(' 75 • 148 ~ lO <t <t
rl <t ...
rl rl
rl
28 _} )f(' 26 _} ~tr 24 ,. 34 • 55 ~ 57 ~ N lO rl MlON "' rl N oomN lO "'
FIGURE 20-A FIGURE 20 -B FIGURE 20-C
Turning Movement Diagrams
Tr elawn ey Ave & Lemon Ave ~
7:45a.m. t o 8:45a.m.
Turning Move ment Di agrams Turning Movem ent Diagrams
Tre lawney Ave & Lemon Ave ~ Tr elawney Ave & Lemon Ave
14:45 t o 15:45 16:00 to 17:00
c 157 c 117
r 22 r 14
-----
114 •
40 ~ • ) (' 96 • ~ ( 140
38 ~ 11 ~ rl M N Ol rl <t
It was suggested at the commiss ion mee ting th at one of the options f o r t he in tersectio n of Te m ple City
Bo u levard at Lemo n Av enu e could be th e in st a lla t io n of protec t ed left turn ph as ing fo r all di rec tio ns. Sin ce
sep arate sig nal p ha ses for prot ect e d left turns w ill r edu ce the gr een time ava ilable f or other phases, th e
CA MUTCD (Sec t ion 40.19} p r ov id es thres hol ds a nd guide lines t o follow before placi ng protect ed left turn
ph as in g.
Guid ance: Protec t ed left turn ph ases should be co nsid er ed w here su ch alternatives co uldn't be utilize d,
and o ne or mo r e of the f o llowing conditi o ns ex ist :
1. Collision s-Fiv e or more left turn co llisio ns for a parti cul ar left t urn m ove me nt during a r ece nt 12-
mo nth period. NOT MET
CITY OF T EMPLE CITY
Prepa r ed By: Transt ech Engin eers, Inc. I Page 11 of 34
~
~
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC A NALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE
2. Dela y-Left-turn dela y of one or more ve hicl es, which we re waiting at the beginning of the green
interval and are sti ll r ema ini ng i n the left t urn lane after at least 80% of the total numbe r of cycles
f o r o ne hour. NOT MET
3. Volume-At new intersect ion s where o nly es timated vo lumes are available, the following criteria
m ay be use d. For pretimed sig na l or a background-cycle-controlled actuated signal, a left turn
volume of more than two vehicles per approach per cycle for a peak hour; or for a traffic-
actuated signal, 50 or more left turning vehicles per hour in one direction with the product of
the turning and conflicting through traffic during the peak hour of 100,000 or more. (Table 3)
NOT MET
4. Miscellaneous. Other factors that might be cons id ered include but are not limited to: impaired
sight distance due to ho r izo ntal o r vertical curva ture, or where there are a large percentage of
buses and trucks .
Table 3: Left Turn Volume and Conflicting Through Volume-Hourly (Heaviest Peak)
TIME Northbound Southbound
NB LT SB Thru Product SB LT NBThru Product
7:45a m t o 8:45am 116 633 73,428 2 3 1144 26,3 12
14:45 to 15:45 57 741 42,237 44 474 20,856
16:00 to 17:00 52 109 8 57,096 47 616 28,952
As see n in the above t able the left turn moveme nts did not exceed th e thresh o ld for accidents nor vo lume
so protected left turn phasing is no t recommended at this intersection. The east-west dire ctions had less
left turn traffi c an d thro ug h movements so were also determined to not exceed t h res holds.
A leve l of se rvice analysis was also co ndu ct ed at the intersection of Temple City Bou levard at Le mon
Avenue. The inter section und er ex ist ing co ndit ion s and ex isting geometric conditions wi ll o perate at LOS
B du ri ng AM peak hours, LO S B during Afternoon peak and LOS A du ring evening peak hours w it h ave r age
d e lay to ve hicl es at accep table leve ls.
Pedestrian Counts: Pede st rian co unts were also t ake n at each intersection to determine how m any
pedestri ans use these crosswalks at th e intersections of (1) Lemon Avenue at Tem pl e City Boulevard and
(2) Lem o n Ave nu e at Trelawney Avenue. The pedestrians co unts were co ndu cted as f ol lows:
Table 4 : Pedestrian Count Information
Count Date Count Time Count Locations
Thursday, 4. AM Count: 6:45AM-8 :45AM (2 hour count) 3. Lemon Avenue and Temple
Ap ril 5, 20 18 5. AFT Cou nt: 1:45P M -3:3 0PM (1.5 hou r co un t) Ci t y Boulevard
4. Lemon Avenue and 6. PM Count: 4:00P M -5:3 0PM (1.5 h ou r co unt) Trelawney Avenue
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Tr anstech Engi neers, In c. I Page 12 of 34
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEM ON AVENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CITY BOUL EVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNE Y AVENUE
Table 5 : Pedestrian Count Information for Temple City Boulevard and lemon Avenue
Date Counts Collected: Thursda y, A pril 5, 20 18
North-South Street: Temple City Boulevard
East-West Street: Lemon Avenue
North Leg South Leg East Leg
TIME Adult School Total Adult School Total Adult School Total Adult
Age Age Peds Age Age Peds Age Age Peds Age
6:45am-7:15am 0 32 32 1 3 0min 2 3 2 11 13 0
7 :15AM-7:45AM 0 20 20 0 3 3 0 2 2 3 3 0min
7:45AM-8:15AM 3 71 74 0 27 27 4 22 26 4
30min
8 :15AM -8:45AM 1 8 9 0 3 0min 0 0 1 3 4 1
1:45PM-2:15PM 2 11 13 0 3 3 1 1 2 1 3 0min
2:15PM -2:45PM 3 2 5 0 5 5 0 0 0 5 30min
2:45PM-3:15PM 0 77 77 0 3 0 30 1 33 34 0 30min
3:15PM-3:30PM 0 5 5 0 3 3 1 2 3 0 15 m i n
4:00PM -4:30PM 0 6 6 2 3 5 2 3 5 1 3 0min
4:30PM-5:00PM 3 3 6 0 3 3 1 0 1 3 3 0min
5 :00PM-5:30PM 1 2 3 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 3 0min
SUB TOTAL 13 237 250 3 81 84 13 78 91 18 PEDESTRIANS
TOTAL 612
PEDESTRIANS
West leg
School
Age
5
10
41
2
2
4
80
1 0
8
6
1
169
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Tr anstech En gi nee r s, Inc. I Pag e 13 of 34
Total
Peds
5
13
45
3
3
9
80
10
9
9
1
187
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMO N AVENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWN EY AVENUE
Table 6: Pedestrian Count Information for Trelawney Avenue and Temple City Boulevard
Date Counts Collected : Thursday, April 5, 2018
North-South Street: Tre law ne y Avenu e
East-West Street: Lemon Avenue
East leg South leg
TIME Adult School Total Adult School
Age Age Peds Age Age
6:45AM -7:15AM 2 129 131 0 57 30min
7 :15AM-7:45AM 1 48 49 2 21 30 min
7 :45AM-8 :15AM 2 203 205 0 94 30min
8:15AM-8:45AM 2 5 7 2 2 3 0min
1:45PM-2:15PM 1 32 30 min 33 2 30
2:15PM -2:45PM 2 2 4 2 6 30min
2:45PM -3:15PM 0 124 124 0 177
30 min
3:15PM-3:30PM 0 15 15 0 22 15 min
4:00PM -4:30PM 0 2 2 0 3 30min
4 :30PM -5:00PM 2 4 6 1 9 3 0min
5:00PM-5:30PM 0 1 1 0 2 30min
SUB TOTAL PEDESTRIANS 12 565 577 9 423
TOTAl PEDESTRIANS 1,009
Total
Peds
57
23
94
4
32
8
177
22
3
10
2
432
As shown in the above coun t s, th e numbe r of ped estria ns usin g the crosswal k near the hi g h sc hoo l is
significan t during AM and AFT peak period s w hi ch co incide w ith th e schoo l bell sc hedu le. As seen in t he
Tre law ney Aven ue a nd Le mon Ave nu e Ped es t rian co unts 300 pedestrians use d the marked crosswa l ks at
sc ho o l let out all w ithin a 30 min p eriod.
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepar ed By: Transt ec h Engine ers, Inc. I Page 14 of 34
TEMPLE CIT Y HIG H SCHOOL TRAFF IC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE
Bi cycl e Count: A s part of the p roj ec t the number of bicycles cross i ng the intersection of Te m ple City
Bou levard an d Lemo n Ave nu e were recorded. As obse rved all bicycles crossi ng this i ntersection used t he
crosswalk a nd were high sc hool age st udents. The majority of bicycles continued to the high schoo l by
rid in g o n t he sid ewalk. Th is co uld be d ue to t he fact that du r in g pea k schoo l hou rs there were a signi f icant
amo un t of.ca rs weavi ng t o the cu rb t o pick u p/drop off st ude nts along Lemon Aven ue.
Table 7: Bicycle Count in 30 Minute Increments
Time by 30 Min North Leg South Leg East Leg W est Leg
06:4 5-07:15 0 1 2 0
07:15-07:45 0 0 0 0
07:45-08:15 3 0 4 3
08 :15-08 :45 1 0 1 0
13:45-14:15 4 0 0 1
14:15-14:45 3 1 0 0
14:45 -15:15 2 3 3 7
15 :15-15:30 1 0 1 2
16:00 -16:30 1 1 2 2
16:30 -17:00 0 1 2 2
17 :00 -17:30 0 0 0 0
To ta l Bikes 15 7 15 17
Rada r Sp ee d Survey: To determi ne actual speeds a long Lemon Aven ue, a radar speed survey was
conducted on Le mon Ave nue betwee n Oak Avenue and Tr elawney Avenue on Th u rsday, March 15, 2018
over a 24-ho ur pe ri od . The ra d ar mea sureme nts fo ll owed guide li nes and proced u re s outlined in t he CVC
Sections 627,21400,22358 and the CAMUTCD 2B.13. Tab le 8 be low shows the 2018 speed survey resu lts:
Table 8: Radar Speed Survey for Lemon Ave between Oak Ave and Trelawney Ave
Dir. of Date/Time of 85 %ile 50%i l e 15%ile Posted
Lo cation
Travel Survey Speed Speed Sp ee d Lim i t MPH
Lemon Avenue: Oak Ave to 3/15/18
1 ~re l a wn ey Ave
EB/WB 32 26 26 30
24-HR
As shown in Table 8, the speed samp les taken on March 15, 2018 show that the 85th percentile speed of
ve hi cles is at 32 MP H. The 85th percentil e indicates tha t 85% ofthe veh icles sampled were traveli ng at 32
mph o r lowe r. Th e 85th% is sli ghtly higher tha n t he posted speed lim it of 30 MPH or 25 MPH when children
are presen t i n a sc hool area. Curre nt ly, there is a 30 mph pos t ed spee d limit sign for eastbound travelers
e nterin g Lemon Ave nu e f rom Oa k Aven ue and two 25 mph sc hoo l speed lim it signs for ea stbound and
~~----------------------------------------------~-----C_I_TY_O~F T_E_M_P_L_E_C~IT __ Y
Pr epared By : Tr anstech Engin ee r s, In c. I Pa ge 15 of 34 •
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRA FFI C ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTER SECTIONS OF LEMO N AVENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVEN UE
wes tbo und trave le r s. The survey sa mple s howed t hat during be ll pe r iods the 10 m ph pace of ve hicles was
between 20 mph to 29 m ph w ith speeds sli g htly in cr eas i ng after ki ds were not on the street.
Accident Data: As part of t he e ngin ee ring r eview p r ocess a searc h of all accide nts t h at may have occurred
a long Lemon Ave nue was und ert ake n. Accident data was obta in ed f rom the computerized accident
r eco rd s system maintained by the St at e of Ca lifornia Statewide Integ ra ted Traffic Records System
(SW ITR S) betwee n the years of June 2012 to 2018 available data.
The following enlists the numbe r of accidents that occurred at Lemon Avenue and Temple City Bo uleva rd ,
Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue and mid bl ock accidents along Lemon Avenue between Temple City
Boulevard and Oak Avenue.
Lemon Ave and Trelawne~ Ave Lemon Ave and Tem~le Cit~ Blvd Midblock on Lemon Ave
• 2018 -0 acci d ents • 2018 -1 accident • 2018-0 accidents
• 2017 -1 accident • 2017-2 accidents • 2017 -1 accident
• 2016 -0 acci de nts • 20 16 -4 accidents • 2016-1 accide nt
• 2015-0 acci dents • 2015 -2 accident s • 2015-0 accident s
• 20 14 -0 accidents • 2014-4 accide nts • 2014 -0 acc ide nts
• 2013 -0 ac cidents • 2013 -1 accid ent • 20 13 -1 acci d ent
• 2012 -0 acc idents • 2012 -4 accidents • 20 12 -0 accidents
Accordi ng to the SW ITRS accident data, there h as been a total of 1 r eported accide nt at the inte rsection
of Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue, 18 accidents at th e inte rsection of Lemon Avenue and Te mple
Ci t y Boulevard, and a total of 3 reported accidents that occ urred midblock on Lemon Avenue between
Temp le City Bo ul eva rd and Oak Ave nu e. Plea se refer t o Table 9: Accident Summary for detailed l ist of the
accide nt history.
No Location Factor
Trelawney Ave and Lemon Ave
EB THR U VE H HIT
LEMON AVE AT
21' E 8/28/2017 AUTO/PED INJ (1) 1 8:02 NB PED IN XWALK
TRELAW NEY AVE
(R -O-W PED)
d Lemon Ave
SB LTVEH STRUCK
TEM PLE CITY
NB BICYCLIST (40
1 BLVD AT LEMO N 0 02/03/2018 06:20 AUTO/B IK E INJ
YEARS OLD-VEH
AVE I MPAIRED)
TEM PLE CITY WB LTVEH HIT SB
2 BLVD AT LEMON 0 10/6/2017 15:22 BROADSIDE PDO THRU VE H
AV E (R-0-W AUTO)
~~--------------------------------------~------~-----C_I _TY_O~F _TE_M __ PL_E_C~IT __ Y
Pr epa red By: T r anstec h Engineers, Inc. I Pa ge 16 of 34 •
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYS IS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AV ENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE
TEMPLE CITY WB THRU VE H HIT
BLVD AT LEMON 0 11/28/2017 10 :00 AUTO/PED INJ (1) SB PED IN XWALK
AVE (R-0-W PED)
NB LTVEH HITSB
TEMPLE CITY THRU VEH AND EB
BLVD AT LEMON 0 1/15/2016 7:55 BROADS IDE PDO
STPED VEH
AVE (R-0-W AUTO)
TEMPLE CITY SB THRU VEH HIT
BLVD AT LEMON 0 1/9/2016 23 :10 REAR END INJ (1) SB STPED VEH
AVE (UNSAFE SPEED)
TEMPLE CITY NB LTVEH HITSB
BLVD AT LEMON 0 5/5/2016 8:30 BROADS I DE I NJ (2) THRU VE H
AVE (R-0-W AUTO)
TEMPLE CITY WB THRU VEH HIT
BLVD AT LEMON 0 7/31/2016 11:10 BROADSIDE INJ (2 ) SB THRU VEH
AVE (STOP SGN I SIG)
SB THRU VEH
LEMON AVE AT (IMPAIRED) HIT SB
TEMPLE CITY 0 6/23/2015 11:30 REAR END PDQ
STPED VEH
BLVD (UNSAFE SPEED)
SB THRU VEH HIT
TEMPLE CITY
BLVD AT LEMON 5/8/2015 PDO
NB LTVEH AND NB
0 16:30 BROADS IDE STPED VEH
AVE (R -0-W AUTO)
LEMON AVE AT SB RTVE H HIT WB
TEMP LE CITY 0 12/5/2014 9:02 BROADSI DE PDQ THRU VE H
BLVD (UNKNOWN)
NB LT BICY HIT BY
TEMPLE CITY
9' s 6/7/2014 AUTO/B IKE INJ (1)
SB THRU VE H
BLVD AT LEMON 13:53
AVE
(BICY MAKING
1M PROP TURN)
TEMPLE CITY NB THRU VEH HIT
BLVD AT LEMON 0 8/30/2014 23:32 BROADS I DE INJ (1) EB LTVEH
AVE (STOP SGN I SIG)
TEMPLE CITY NB THRU VEH HIT
BLVD AT LEMON 0 12/16/2014 16:24 REAR END INJ (1) NB THRU VE H
AVE (TOO CLOSE)
TEMP LE CITY SB PASS ING VE H
BLVD AT LEMON 26'S 5/22/2013 15:14 AUTO/BIKE IN J (1 ) HIT SB THRU BICY
AVE (IMPROP PASS)
TEMPLE CITY SB LTV EH HIT EB
BLVD AT LEMON 9'S 10/23/2012 9:44 AUTO/PED I NJ (1) PED IN XWALK
AVE (R-0-W PED)
~-----------------------------------------------------C_I T_Y_O_F_T_E_M_P_LE_C_I __ TY
• Prepared By : Transt ech En g inee rs, In c. I Page 17 of 34
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOO L TRAFFIC ANA LYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERS ECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNE Y AVENUE
TEM PLE CITY NB LT VEH HIT SB
16 BLVD AT LEMON 0 12/10/201 2 15:30 BROADS IDE INJ (2) THRU VEH
AV E (R-0-W AU TO)
TEMPLE CITY
17 BLVD AT LEMON 0 12/19/2012 8:30 HITOBJ PDO EB RT VEH HIT OBJ
AVE (1M PROP TURN)
TEMPLE CITY WB T HRU VEH HIT
18 BLVD AT LEMON 0 12/31/2012 7:10 BROADSIDE INJ (1) NB THRU VE H
AVE (STOP SGN I SIG)
Midblock on Lemon Ave
LEMON AVE AT WB STPED VEH HIT
380' WB TH RU BICY ·AND 1 TEMPL E CITY 4/6/2017 7:50 SIDESWIPE PDO w WB STPED VEH
BLVD (OTHER HAZ)
LEM ON AVE AT
114' NB BCKING VEH HIT
2 TEMPLE CITY 5/27/2016 8 :20 BROADSIDE PDO EB THRU VEH w ·BLVD (R -0-W A UTO)
LEMON AV E AT WB VEH ENT TRA FF 100'
3 TEMPLE CITY 12/20/2013 7:45 SID ESWIP E PDO HIT WB THR U VE H w
BLVD (S TRTN G I BCK NG )
Criteria for Determining If Stop Contrai l s Warranted: In o rd e r to thoroughly assess potentia l m easures
that the intersection o f Lemon Avenue and Tre la wney Aven ue could benefit from, an analysis of all-way
st op installation was conduct ed. At Lemon Ave n ue a nd Trelawney Avenue only the south leg is stop
co ntro ll ed, while t he east leg is un cont r o ll e d . Traffic co ntrol d evices work in co ncert with the basic "ru les
of the road" co nta in ed in traffic laws and ordi nances. The Ca lifornia Manua l of Un iform Traffic Devices
(CAM UTCD) Section 2B.07 d escribes appl ications, wa rra nts, a nd p lacement of STOP signs (R1-1). The
STOP sig n is a regu lato ry d evice t h at is used when traffic is r eq uired to st op. STOP signs are used to assign
rig ht-of -way at an intersect i on. Mu lti-way co ntro l is used w he r e the vo lu me o f t r affi c on the in t e rsecti ng
r oads is app rox im ately equal.
Sto p signs a r e not us ed as a sp eed co ntro l device a nd s hou ld be u sed only where warranted. The
placement of t h ese signs is dictated by e ng in eering judg m e nt and b ase d on guidelines found in the
CA MUTCD and eve. The City's fo ll ows the criteria for determining if two-way or all -way stop control is
warranted as se t by th e CAM UTCD . Th ese factors in clude minimum volume on each of the street
approaches, acc ide nt investigation, speed of traffic, number of pedestrians and potential sight
obstru ctions.
A ll-Way Stop Installation: Th e fo llowing b r i efly outlin es the Cr ite ria for the installation of All -Way stop
warra nts.
ALL-WAY STOP CONTR O L WARRANT FOR I NSTALLATI ON CAMUTCD SECTI ON 28.07
The placem ent o f All -Way stop contro l is wa r ra nted when:
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Trans t ech Engineers, Inc. I Pag e 18 of 34
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE
A. Traffic control signals ar e ju st ified NOT MET
B. A crash probl em exi sts as indicated by 5 or more accidents in a 12-month period NOT MET
C. Minimum Volumes are met if:
1. Volume entering intersection from the major approach (total of both approaches) averages
300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day. NOT MET And
2. The combined vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle volumes entering the intersection from the
minor street approaches averages at least 200 units per hour for the sa me 8 hours . NOT MET
3. If the 85 1h percentile approach speed of the major-street exceeds 40 mph, the minimum
volumes are 70 percent ofthe above values. NOT MET
Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include:
A. The need to contro l left-turn conflicts
B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian co nflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian
volumes
C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to
negotiate the intersection unles s conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop
D. An intersec tion of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and
operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational
characteristics ofthe intersection.
The traffic and pedestrian volume indicates the intersection does not meet or exceed minimum
thresholds for more than 2 hours for the installation of all-way stop control so all-way stop control is not
recommended at this location .
Table 10: Peak Hour Approach Counts (8 Hours)
Met Met
East Bound Pedestrians
and West Minimum Highest
Minimum
Threshold of
crossing
Threshold of
Bound Approach on Lemon
300 Vehicles at least 200
Traffic on Trelawney Avenue TOTAL
Time Lemon Ave
per hour for
Avenue during the Cars+
units per
Both
any 8 hours
(Northbound) same peak Peds
hour for the
of an same 8
Approaches Minor St traffic hours
(Major
average day
(East Leg)
hours
Street)
(both (highest
approaches) approach)?
7:00-8:00 542 YES 30 180 210 YES
8:00-9:00 389 YES 30 212 242 YES
9:00-10 :00 91 NO 59 7 66 NO
13:00-14:00 91 NO 15 33 48 NO
14:00-15:00 272 NO 21 128 149 NO
15:00-16:00 290 NO 15 17 32 NO
16:00-17:00 222 NO 14 6 20 NO
17:00-18:00 205 NO 15 1 16 NO
~ CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
~~~~:---------------------------------------P-re_p_a-re~d-B-y:-T-ra-n-st-ec_h_E-ng-i -ne-e-rs-,-ln-c.-I~Pa_g_e_1_9 _of_3_4
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INT ERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE
Line of Sight at Intersections: The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officia ls
(AASHTO) "A Policy on Geome t ric Design of Highways and Streets" and other eng in eering resources has
set up guidelines and standards for est im atin g line of sight at intersections.
Improving Sight Lines at Crosswalks and Crossing Vehicles: At pedestrian crossings and at sid e street
crossings, generous sight distances and unobstructed sight lines allow motorists and pedestrians to detect
each other in time to avoid collisions. Sight lines shou ld be designed so that the motorist can observe the
movement of a pedestrian or a crossing motorist for a long enoug h period of time to accurate ly determine
the approaching vehicles or pedestrians speed. If the motorist has on ly a brief g limpse of a waiting
pedestrian or car they cannot observe their speed, and he or she may overestimate the speed and not
sufficiently slow his or her approach to the crosswa lk or not antic ipate a cross in g vehicle in time to stop.
A vehicle's driver needs to be able to have room to stop before colliding with something in the roadway,
such as a pedestrian in a crosswalk, a stopped vehicle or road debris. To allow drivers to perceive, react,
and safely stop, a minimum st opping sight distance must be ava il ab le. Stopping sight distance is defined
as the sum of two distances (AASHTO, Green Book):
1. Reaction distance-the distance traveled by the vehicle from the in stant the driver sees an object
necessitating a stop to the instant the brakes are appl ied; plus
2. Braking distance-the distance traveled by the vehicle from the instant brake application begins to the
instant when the vehicle has come to complete stop.
The reaction distance is based on the reaction time ofthe driver and the speed ofthe vehicle. The braking
distance is dependent upon the ve hicle speed and the coefficient of friction between the tires and
roadway. AASHTO (AASHTO Table 3-1 Stopping Sight Distance on Level Roadways) li sts minimum
recommended stopping sight distances based on design speed and the sum of r eact ion distance and
braking distance. At 25 mph, for example, 91.9 feet is needed for reaction distance and 60 f eet is needed
for braking distance. When these numbers are added, and rounded, the total distance is rounded to 155
feet. The stopping sight distance needed is 155 feet for a street w ith a posted speed of 25 mph.
Table 11: Stopping Sight Distance
Design Brake reaction Braking distance on Stopping Sight Distance
Speed distance level Calculated Design
(mph) (ft) (ft) {ft) (ft)
15 55.1 21.6 76.7 80
20 73.5 38.4 111.9 115
Note: Brake reaction distance predicated on a time of 2.5s; deceleration rate 11.2 ft/sec2
Obstructions within Sight Triangles: At the decision point,
the d ri ver's eye height is used for measurement. Any object
within the sight triangle t hat would obstruct the driver's view
of an app roac hin g vehicle or a pedestrian waiting on a curb
to cross should be removed or modified or appropriate traffic
I lOCAl I
I
arnu :r I
AOfATOIICliAAOI' ~ ~ I
Y.I!W OllfiiiUCTfON" fOOl! OF IJIOU\OI A ~~---- --~ -~-J fOO l 0, ~AVUIIHf
~ \ "' ----ElOD ClldB J STATE HIOHWAY
-----------contro l devices should be installed as per the Cal iforn ia Figure 21: Example of Stopping Sight Distance Triangle
~~--------------------------------------------------C_I_TY_O~F _TE_M_P_L_E_C_IT_Y
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 20 of 34 •
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFF I C ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE A T
(1) T EMPLE CI TY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWN EY AVENUE
M an ual o n Uniform Traffic Co ntrol Devices. Obstructions within sig ht tria ngles cou ld be buildings,
ve hi cles, h edges, trees, bushes, tall crops, walls, fence s, etc. the above figure s hows a sight triangle and
t he clear view triangle. The in tersecti on of Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue is stop controlled in the
sou th leg on ly.
Figure 22: Stopping Sight Distance Triang le for Vehicles Turning onto Lemon Avenue from Trelawney Av enue.
Red Curb Recommendations : For the south sid e of Lemon Avenue, approxi mately 30' red on west si de to
driveway apron and approxim ate ly 20' west of driveway+ curb return, and approximately 70' red on east side
driveway. As we ll as 20' on the either side of Trelawney Avenue south of the crosswalk.
Figure 23: Stopping Sight Distance Triangle for Pede strians Cross ing at the crosswalk in the EL.
Red Cu r b Recommendations : Fo r the nort h side approximately 52' of red curb west of crosswalk, an d
app r oximate ly 70' of red curb eas t of crosswa lk. The same red curb reco m mendations app ly f or the south side
du e to the ve hicle stopp in g sight distance as sh ow n in Figure 22 above .
~ CITY OF TEMPLE CITY ~:------------,-
• Prepare d By: Tran stech Engineers, Inc. I Page 21 of 34
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTER SECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CI T Y BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE
Figure 24: Stopping Sight Di stance Tri angle for Ped estrians Cros sing at the W est leg Crosswa lk, based on
the Scenario of the Existing East leg Crosswalk being Rem oved and Re located to the West leg.
Red Curb Rec ommendation: For the north sid e approxim ately 70' of red curb west of crosswalk to the 1'1
parking lot d ri veway, and app r ox i mately 76' of red cu rb east of crosswa l k connecting to the ex isting red curb.
The sa me r ed cu rb r ecommendations apply for the south side due to the veh icle stopping sight distance as
shown in Figure 22 above.
Pl ease r ef e r to the following pages for recommendations and diagrams based on th e analysis
conducted.
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By : Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 22 of 34
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD MD AT (2.) TRELAWNEY AVENUE
RECOMMENDATIONS
The installation of all traffic control devices on public streets are guided by the California Manual of
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), the California Vehicle Code (CVC), and on an engineering
study/judgement.
Improvements at lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard
1. Install "stay back lines" I "yield lines" approaching all cross walks in each leg. This will
encourage vehicles to stop behind crosswalk lines.
2. Install pedestrian push buttons for pedestrians crossing north and south, make sure
push button style matches the other existing push buttons for east/west crossing.
3. Install updated push button signage at all push buttons so that pedestrians know when
to cross. See image showing R10-3i to be installed at each push button.
4. Increase the time for pedestrians to cross Temple City Blvd with pedestrians crossing
a few seconds before vehicles are given a green. CAMUTCD Section 4E.06
I DDM'l CROSS
"At intersections with high pedestrian volumes and high conflicting turning vehicle volumes, a
brief leading pedestrian interval, during which an advance WALKING PERSON indication is
displayed for the crosswalk while red indications continue to be displayed to parallel through
and/or turning traffic, may be used to reduce conflicts between pedestrians and turning vehicles."
Also "At intersections with pedestrian volumes so high that drivers have difficulty finding an opportunity to
turn across the crosswalk, the duration of the green interval for a concurrent vehicular movement can be
intentionally set to extend beyond the pedestrian clearance time to provide drivers additional green time to
turn while the don't walk symbol is displayed."
~:------------------------------------------~------~------CI_T_Y_O~F~T_E_M~P~L~E ~C ~IT~Y
• Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 23 of 34
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2} TRELAWNEY AVENUE
Improvements at Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue
1. Outline the existing yellow ladder crosswalks in the south leg and the east leg with
highly reflective yellow raised pavement markers (RPM).
2. Install shark teeth yield lines 30-feet in advance of the crosswalk for westbound and
eastbound travelers.
3. Install corresponding "YIELD HERE FOR PEDS" signs (Rl-5) adjacent to the proposed
yield lines for eastbound and westbound travelers.
4. Install Double Sided Pedestrian Activated Flashing Beacons on top of existing
Pedestrian crossing signs to draw attention to the crosswalk location.
5. Purchase (2) new YIELD to pedestrian in-road signs to be placed at each crosswalk by
school staff during school hours to meet CAMUTCD guidelines for California. (Rl-6b)
California law uses Yield to pedestrian signs.
* The legend STATE LAW is optional. A fluorescent
yellow-green background color may be used instead
of yellow for this sign.
v
HERE ...
~I\
RI·S
STATE *
~ v
TO
WITHIN
CROSSWALK
Rt-6
Crosswalk Option 1: Leave the existing crosswalk in the east leg and install improvements for increased
line of sight. These improvements would include the following:
a) Installation of additional red curb along Lemon Avenue as shown in Figure 26 based on AASHTO's
Stopping Sight Distance Design Speed of 25 mph. For the north side approximately 52' of red curb
should be installed west of the crosswalk, and approximately 70' of red curb should be installed east
of the crosswalk. The same red curb recommendations apply for the south side as shown in Figure 22
due to the vehicle stopping sight distance. The red curb recommendations take into account the line
of sight needed for vehicles turning out of Trelawney Avenue onto Lemon Avenue as well as for
pedestrians waiting to cross Lemon Avenue .
b) Construct a larger landing pad for pedestrians to wait to cross by expanding the curb return with a
mini bulb out or larger paved waiting area.
~. -----------~--~-CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 24 of 34 Ill
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTER SECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CIT Y BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENU E
Cro ss walk Option 2: Remove the ex isting ea st leg cross wa lk and install a new crosswa l k i n the west leg to
better accom moda te th e large number of students using t h e crosswa lk com i ng from the west sid e of
Trelawney Ave nue. There is a large r la nding pad area for wai ting pedestrians as well as sidewa lks leading
up t o the ramp. This option wou ld also r ed uce the nu mbe r of ve hicle m ovements crossin g over the
crosswalk. The following improvements wo uld have to be imple me nted for th is option:
a) Fu ll r emova l of th e ex isti ng eas t leg crosswa lk (sand blast) so it is no longer v isible.
b) Removal of a ll pedestrian sig nage/posts at t he cross in g, and recon struction t he ex isting curb ramp o n
the north side of Lem o n Ave nu e convert in g it to regular cu r b so there is no remain ing crossing
in d icat io n in the east leg.
c) Installation of a new yellow ladde r st r iped crosswalk in the west leg. This would include con struction
of a new ADA com pli ant curb ramp w ith truncated domes o n th e north sid e of Lemon Avenue . There
is already an ex isting cu rb ramp on the south sid e. The post and signage from the removed crosswalk
can be utilized f or t he new location.
d) In sta ll at io n of ad ditio nal red curb along Lemon Ave nu e as shown in Figure 27 ba se d on AASHTO 's
St opping Sigh t Distance Design Speed of 25 mph . For the north side approximately 70 ' of r ed cu rb
shou ld be in sta ll ed west of the new west leg crosswa lk t o the 151 parki ng lot d r iveway, and
app roxim ate ly 76' of red curb shou ld be in sta ll ed east of the new west leg cro ss wa lk connect i ng t o
the ex ist in g red curb. Th e same red cu rb recommenda ti o ns appl y fo r the sou th side as shown i n Figure
22 due to t he vehicle stopping sig ht distance. Th e red curb recommendation s t ake i nto accoun t the
line of sig ht needed for vehicles turning out of Trelawney Ave nu e onto Lemon Avenue as well as for
pedestrians wa iting to cross Lemon Avenue.
Figure 27: Propos ed Diagram for Lemon Avenu e and Trelawney Avenue (Removal of Ex isting East Leg
Cro ss wal Installation of New W es t Crosswal
•
I nsta llation a new yellow ladder
striped cros swalk In the west leg.
This woukf Include cons truction
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Pre pared By : T ra n stech Engineers, Inc. I Page 25 of 34
TEMP LE CITY HIGH SCH OOL TRAFFIC ANALYS IS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1) TEMP LE CI TY BO ULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVEN UE
AITACHMENTS
Attachment 1: Turning Movement Count for Lemon Ave nue at Temple City Boulevard
Attachment 2: Turning Movement Count for Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue
Attachment 3 : Average Daily Traffic {ADT) Counts for Trelawney Avenue
Attachm ent 4 : 24 Hour Radar Speed Survey on Lemon Avenue
Attac hment 5: Turni ng Movement Count for Lemon Avenue at Temple City Boulevard (Ri g ht and Left
Turns on Red)
Attachment 6: LOS Calculations for AM Peak
Attachment 7: LOS Calculations for Afternoon Peak
Attachment 8 : LOS Calculations for PM Peak
CITY OF TE MPLE CITY
Prepa r ed By: T ranstech Engineers, In c. I Page 26 of 34
TEMPLE CI TY HIG H SC HOO L TRA FFIC A NALYS IS FOCUSE D AT TH E INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENU E AT
(1 ) TEMPL E CITY BOULEVARD A ND AT (2) TRE LAW N EY AVENUE
Attachment 1 : Turning Movement Count for lemon Avenue at Temple City Boulevard
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
PROJECT NAME: AdottPeds -hand c.ount
Bicycles -hand count PROJECT NO:
DATE:
TIME
0 &:45.07:00
07:00.07:15
07:15.07:30
07:30.07:<45
07:45.(18:00
08:00-08:15
01:15.01:30
01:30.08:AS
13:45-14:00
14:00-14:15
14:15·14:30
14:30·14:45
14:45·15:00
15:00-15:15
15:.30·15:45
11:00·18:15
11:15·18:30
18:30·16:45
18:45-1 7:00
17:00-17:15
17:15·17:30
17:30·17:45
17:45·11:00
11020
n.y,, AC!ri!f 2011
N..S STREET: TEMPL E Crt! BlYO
12 1t 1 0 2
NORTH HOUND SOUTH BOUND ti..S
lEFT THRU RIGHT lEfT THRU RIGHT TOTAL
2 1 204 51 4 284
5 8 215 "' 25 404
32 233 1 05 ' 385
21 289 109 414
4i 281 17 1 50 .. 510
4 3 114 10 12 200 •• 842
20 352 152 ...
207
11 131 13 301
12 111 11 343
20 177 11 ...
" 143 12 157 11 ...
11 170 15 241 14 ...
10 10 271 •• 505
21 141 10 217 17 ...
151 " 210 453
120 13 ,. 431
" 2 70 13 •••
20 101 12 ... 24 637
118 11 14 ... 10 512
10 10 234 .. •••
E·\Y STREET: _,l~EioiO=N'----.,-------
11 15 14 •
EASTBOUND
lEFT THRU RIGHT
10
14
10
11
14
.. ..
10
• 12
" 0
10
21 ..
10
17 ..
10
" " 13
42 ..
30
12
"
11
10
57
23
12
11
10
15
10
11
WfSTOOUNO
LEFT TJIRU
2 0
42
14
13
10 az
21 u
10
14
10
10
15
11
RIGHT TOT AL
12 42
12 1G3
71
50
13 166
21 114
11 110 ••
20
70
38 ..
78
73
•• ..
48 ..
PEO COUNT --r-PED COUNT
School•g• pedutrb~t I .duu •ge pedetlrflns
t A j 5 13
Nl Sl El WL NL SL EL Wl
2 1 1
30
11
28 .,
11
24
53
21
"
10
13
"
10 ..
" 10
DIKE COUNT ----,
Di~u . I
Nl Sl El Wl
PEAK-HOUR VOLUME A N ALYSIS
CALCU!.AJEO PEAK HOUR Vot.UMES:A¥
3S
••
113
EL
ET
••
., 381 23
SR ST Sl
8:45-7:4 5
NL NT NR
130 921
WR
wr
Wl
CALCU!.ATEQ PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-NOON
28 El
24 . ET
55 ER
53 639 29
SR
Nl ..
ST
NT ...
S l
NR
22
WR
wr
Wl
CALC\JlAJEO PEAK HQUR VOlUI!I.ESfM
28 ..
"
El
ET ••
65 1098 47
SB ST Sl
Ill
"
18:00-17:00
NT
8 16
NR
21
WR
wr
Wl
31
71
II
31
37
10
20
27
10
50
" 141
••
60
00
11
15
27
AOJUSJEQ PEAK HOUR VOLUMES=AM
El
ET
ER
100 tU 2l
SR ST
Nl NT
118 1t44
Sl
NR
••
WR
wr
Wl
AOJUSJEQ PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-NOON
El
ET
ER
ea ut u
SR
Nl
57
ST
14:45·15:30
NT
474
SL
NR
22
AQJUSIEQ PEAK HOUR yot,UMES.f>.W
El
ET
ER
)4 490 24
SR ST Sl
NL
••
17:00·17:30
NT
310
NR
11
WR
wr
Wl
WR
wr
Wl
18
103
••
2 4 ••
21
13
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Pr e pared By : Transtech Engi neers, Inc. I Page 27 of 34
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYS IS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AV ENUE AT
(1) TE MPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TR ELAWNEY AV ENUE
Attachment 2: Turning Movement Count for Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Aven ue
T URNING MOVEMENT COUNT
PROJECT NAME: Ttmplt Citx Stlt!r fttY!tw Adult Ptdt ·hand count
BJcyc,., ·hand count PROJECT NO:
DATE:
TIM E
0&:45.07:00
07:0 0.07:15
07:15-07:30
07:30.07: .. 5
07;45-01:00
01:00-01:15
01:15..01:30
01:30-01: .. 5
14 :0 0·14:16
14:1 5·14:30
14 :3 0-14:45
15 :00-15:15
15:15-15:30
15:3 0-15:45
1C:OO-tl5:15
11:15·11:30
11:30·16:45
11:-45·17:00
17:00-17:15
17:15-17:30
17:30··17:45
17:4 15·11:0 0
11010
Thu.-t AF!!'II 2011
N ..S STREET; .rT!!JAE"LA"W"'H"'E"-T _____ _
12 1t 10
UORTH BOUND SOUTH BOUND N ..S
LEFT TH RU RIOH T LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL
" 33
12 12
" "
.. "
E·WSTREET: _.LE_,N,.O'-"H--------
11 14
EAST BOUND
LEFT THRU RIG HT
17
II 22
25 10 " .
" 20 ..
" "
20
" 11 .. ..
70 ••
..
27 ..
" ..
15
12
15
22
WEST OOUND E·W
LHT THRU RIOHT TOTAL
n ea
.. 159
12 61
n u
ItS 112
101 .. ..
" .. ..
•• .. ..
2$
11 .. ..
so
202 ..
11
12 ..
tOI
110 ..
" •• • •
70 ..
1
NL
PEOCOUNT
Sch ooltgt p t dultlt nt • SL El
"
,, u . ..
52
2
17
..
t OO
"
110 •
" ..
1 ..
22
PEAK-HOUR VOLUME ANALYSIS
114
•o
0
70
22
0 ..
"
CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-AM
EL
ET
••
••
NL
•
ST
01:4 5-07:4 5
NT
SL
HA
••
WA
WT
I'lL
CALCULATED PEAK HOUR VQlUM ES·N OON
EL
ET
••
0
SA
NL
ST
13:45-1 <1:<15
NT
SL
NR ..
WR
WT
I'lL
CALCULAJEQ PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-PM
EL
ET ••
0 0 0
••
NL
1
ST
1&:00-17:00
liT NR
13
WA
WT
WL
172 ..
110
23
117 ,.
"' ..
u o ..
..
ADJUSTED PEAK HOUB VOLUMES·AM
EL
ET • •
SR
NL
ST SL
NT NR
W A
WT
WL
A DJUSTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES·NOON
EL
ET
••
••
tiL
2
ST
NT
SL
NR
••
AOJUSIEQ PEAK HOUR VOLUUES£M
EL
ET
••
••
tiL
ST SL
17.00·17.30
NT NR
WR
WT
I'll
WR
VfT
WL
211
•
m
22
"
..
WL NL
PEDCOUNT
Ad~o~!lptdtstri•n•
I
Sl. EL WL NL
B I I<ECOUNT ~
Olht . I
SL EL I'll
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By : Transt ech Enginee r s, Inc. I Pag e 28 of 34
TEMPLE CI TY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFF IC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CITY BOU LEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE
Attac hm e nt 3: Avera ge Da i l y Traffic (ADT) Co unts for Trel awn ey Avenue
Day : Thursday
Date: 3/15/2018
Prepared byNOS/ATD
VOLU ME
Trelawney Ave S/0 Lemon Ave
City: Tem ple City
Project II: CA18_5181_001
DAILYTOTALS ~
AM Period 1 NB SB EB WB TOTAL I PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL I
00:00 0 0 0 12:00 1 2 3
00:15 0 0 0 12:15 2 0 2
00:30 0 0 0 12:3 0 3 6 9
00:45 1 1 0 1 1 12:45 3 9 2 10 5 19
01:00 0 0 0 13:00 4 4 8
01:15 0 0 0 13:15 3 1 4
01:30 0 0 0 13:30 1 2 3
0 1 :45 0 0 0 13:45 7 15 2 9 9 24
02:00 0 0 0 14:00 7 12 19
02:1 5 0 0 0 14:15 4 5 9
02:30 0 0 0 1 4:30 4 4 8
02:45 0 0 0 14:45 6 2 1 3 24 9 45
03:00 0 0 0 15:00 9 24 33
03:15 0 0 0 15:15 3 7 10
03:30 1 0 1 15:30 2 8 10
03:45 0 1 0 0 1 15:45 1 15 2 41 3 56
04:00 1 0 1 16:00 4 2 6
04 :15 0 0 0 16:15 3 5 8
04:30 0 0 0 16:30 6 3 9
04:45 0 1 0 0 1 16:45 1 14 3 13 4 27
05:00 1 0 1 17:00 5 6 11
05:1 5 0 0 0 1 7:1 5 3 5 8
05:30 0 0 0 17:30 5 3 8
05:45 1 2 0 1 2 17:45 2 15 7 21 9 3 6
06:00 4 1 5 18:00 3 4 7
06:15 3 0 3 18:15 1 6 7
06:30 0 1 1 18:30 2 2 4
06:45 1 8 0 2 1 1 0 18:45 3 9 1 13 4 22
07:00 6 2 8 19:00 2 3 5
07:15 3 3 6 19:15 2 0 2
07:30 11 7 18 19:30 2 3 5
07:45 10 30 2 14 12 4 4 19:45 1 7 0 6 1 13
08:00 3 4 7 20:00 3 2 5
08:15 3 8 11 20:15 0 0 0
08:30 7 4 11 20:30 0 0 0
08:45 17 30 22 38 39 68 20:45 1 4 0 2 1 6
09:00 14 26 40 21:00 0 2 2
09:15 6 5 11 21:15 1 1 2
09:30 23 34 5 7 21:30 1 0 1
09:45 16 59 28 93 44 1 52 21:45 0 2 2 5 2 7
10:00 2 3 5 22:00 0 1 1
10:15 4 2 6 22:15 0 2 2
10:30 1 2 3 22:30 0 1 1
10:45 2 9 4 11 6 20 22:45 0 0 4 0 4
11:00 1 2 3 23:00 1 3 4
11:15 2 1 3 23:1 5 0 0 0
11:30 1 1 2 23:30 1 0 1
11:45 1 5 1 5 2 10 23:4 5 0 2 0 3 0 5
TOTALS 1 46 163 309 TOTALS 113 1 5 1 264
SPLIT % 47.2% 52.8% 53 .9% SPLIT % 42.8% 57.2% 4 6.1%
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Pea k Hour 08:45 09:00 0 9:00 PM Peak Hour 14:15 14:45 14:45
AM PkVo lume 60 93 152 PM Pk Volume 23 42 62
Pk Hr Fact or 0.652 0.684 0.667 Pk Hr Fac t or 0.639 0.438 0.470
7 -9Volume 60 5 2 112 4 -6Volume 29 34 63
7 -9Peak Ho ur 07:00 08:00 08:00 4 -6 Peak Hour 16:15 17:00 17 :00
7 -9 Pk Volume 30 38 68 4 -6 Pk Vo lume 15 21 36
Pk Hr Factor 0.682 0.432 ,, ~-0.436 Pk Hr Fa ct o r 0.625 0.750 0. O.l 0.818
CITY OF TE M PLE CITY
Prepared By: Transt ech Engi neers, In c. I Page 29 of 34
TEMPLE CITY HI GH SCHOO L TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUS ED AT TH E INTER SECTIONS OF LEMON AVE NU E AT
(1 ) TEMPL E CI TY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNE Y AVENUE
Attac hment 4: 24 Hour Radar Sp ee d Survey on Le mon Avenue
DJy: Thursday
D•te: 3/15/2018
D1y: Thursday
Dol t: 3/1$/20 18
Summtrv
I "1'11-,1;
00:00AM
01:00
02 :00 1-03 :00
04 :00
1-
05:00 1-
06 :00 1-
07:00 1-
08 :00 1-
09 :00 1-
10 :00
I ~
11:00
12:00 PM
13 :00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00 I ~
:~
18 :00
1!1:00 -20:00 --Zl:OO -22:00
U :OO -
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
9
8
5
2
0
3
2
14
15
2
3
4
2
2
1
0
2
·~1: I ~
•oJTotah ~~
AMI/olumu 11
li AM IW
AMPul<H0\11 07il0
Volu me 9
PM Volumu so
!I PM ~~
PMPttk Uollf U1l0
Volume IS
~ll! "lj ~I:J-_.J
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
4 14
4 $ 255
44 141
2 12
4 7
s 16
I 3 3
7 22
39 96
47 88
16 45
9 38
9 54
7 23
6 28
2 9
3 I
0 3
I#·-,,, 1'-i, .
~~ lOll
100 4-16 ,. ISII
0 /tX 07 00
4S m
14& 440
~~ IS !I
t HO 14 (.0
47 !l6
Dlroctlontl Puk Pt rlods
All Speeds Volum e
931
1!-.:Tl.
2
I
0
0
1
0
22
18 /
138
35
25
25
51
29
97
92
103
88
110
3 1
56
20
8
3
~~·
liK
41&
UM
07.00
117
618
llK
lUll!
110
AM7·9
·-
SPEE D
Lemon Ave W/0 Trel awney Ave
SPEE D
l emon Ave W /0 Trelawn cy Ave
'll:(t, ~t:..:-::~ i ::rz:-~ IN't':rt~ ilJ..J.""'"l.'
4 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
I 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0 0
10 3 1 0 0
42 4 0 0 0
47 10 1 0 0
34 l 0 0 0
14 I 1 0 0
IS 2 2 0 0
31 5 0 0 0
21 9 1 0 0
25 1 0 0 0
43 s 0 0 0
so 5 I 0 0
51 16 0 0 0
70 12 2 I 0
78 6 0 0 0
24 6 2 I 0
14 2 2 0 0
II I ) 0 0
3 0 0 0 0
I...,.. ~~---IT'l.W.l1. ..a!llll!l:l.
1111 JM Ill 01<
170 ,. s 0 0
611 IM "" 08 00 (8(10 11 00
47 10 7
m 61 u 2 0
I»> "' "" OM
IAOO IUlQ noo l&llO
10 16 l I
NOO N 12·2 ,. Vo!unwr " Volum e
J l " n s .. • 7~ 427
~-~-.I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PM4·6
-·
tO:::~J
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CUy : Tomplo City
Project II: CA I 8_5181_002
City: T•mple Clty
Projtct W: CA I8_5181_001
,.,~l"t~ I t!. ::;'lT)j
0 0 6
0 0 2
0 0 2
0 0 1
0 0 1
0 0 3
0 0 55
0 0 54 2
0 0 389
0 0 91
0 0 54
0 0 65
0 0 U4
0 0 91
0 0 172
0 0 190
0 0 121
0 0 105
0 0 16 2
0 0 97
0 0 125
0 0 so
0 0 27
0 D 11
IOOlC
0 0 11 11
4IW
0700
541
0 0 177.
~~
noo --l!IO
Off Puk Volum~s
" Yolo.mo " 14" 141 4 . . 47"
CITY OF TE MPLE CITY
Pr epa red By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 30 of 34
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTION S OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE
Attachment 5: Turning Movement Counts for Right and Left Turns on Red at Lemon Avenue at
Temple City Boulevard
Turning Movomont Count TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT Prop:uod by: G.E. Trnfnc Survoys
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT NO: LTOY -Lon lum on Yollow
DATE: RTOR. Right Tum on Rod · All OlrecUona
LTOR ·loR Turn on Rod NO onlv
N .SSTREET: TEMPLE CllY BLVD E·WSTREET: LEMON
12 II t O 4 3 2 16 15 14
TIME NORTHBOUND SOUTit BOUND N·S EASTBOUND
LTOR LTOY RTOR LTOR LTOY RTOR TOTAL LTOR LTOY RTOR
06:45.07:00 3 I 4 10
07:00·07:15 2 10 2 I 3 18 8
07:15-07:30 3 1 4 1
07:30-07:45 I 1 2 I 7
07:4 5.08:00 3 1 3 1 14 1 1 9
08:00.08:15 4 I 5 t 11 1 4 15
08:15·08:30 t 2 3 18
08:30.08:45 I 1 1 5
13:45·14:00 I 1 I 4
14:00-1 4:16 I I I 3 2 15
14:15-14:30 I 2 3
14:31).14;46 1 3 3 1 t 1 7
14:4 5·15:00 t 6 I I I 10 9
15:00·15:15 2 2 4 I 7
15:16·16:30 I I 3 1 6 7
15:30·15:45 0
16:00-16:15 I I 1 3 1 6
16:15-18:30 0 4
18:31).16:45 2 1 3 5
18:45-17:00 3 I 1 I 1 7 7
17:00.17:15 1 I 2 12
17:15-17:30 1 1 2 6
17:30 -17:45 0
17:45·10:00 0
8 1 6
WESTBOUND
LTOR LTOY RTOR
I 6
2
11
7
1
2
5
2
1 1 1
3
8
I 1 I
1 5
3
3
4
2
E·W
TOTAL
11
10
12
15
12
20
20
11
1
20
3
11
12
14
10
0
10
8
7
7
12
8
0
0
Adult Pods· hond count
Olcyclu • h nnd c ount
Hnnd ·Avo QU EUE WAITING (tnllya)
NBL NOR SDR EBR
~·----------------------------------------------------------C_IT_Y_O_F_T_E_M_P_L_E _C_IT_Y
Prepa r ed By: Trans t ech Engineers, In c. I Page 31 of 34 •
WBR
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2] TRELAWNEY AVENUE
Attachment 6: LOS Calculations for AM Peak
MITIG9 -Existing AM Peak Thu May 3, 2018 10:31:24
Temple City School Circulation Assessment
Existing Conditions
AM Peak
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 RCH Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Page 1-1
··············································································~· Intersection #1 Temple City Blvd/Lemon Ave ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Cycle (sec) :
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
10
37
Critical Vol./Cap.(X}:
Average Delay (sec/veh}:
Level Of Service:
0.510
13.2
B
Street Name: Temple City Blvd Lemon Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound Wast Bound
Movement: L ~ T - R L -T -R L -T -R L - T - R
------------1---------------JJ ---------------II ---------------J J---------------1 Control: Permitted Pe~tted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 4 .0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
------------l---------------ll ---------------11---------------ll ---------------l Volume Nodule:AM Peak
ease Vol: 116 1144 44 23 633 100 so 75 148 46 103 86
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 116 1144 44 23 633 100 50 75 149 46 103 86
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 116 1144 44 23 633 100 50 75 148 46 103 86
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 116 1144 44 23 633 100 50 75 148 46 103 96
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 116 1144 44 23 633 100 50 75 148 46 103 96
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00
FinalVolume: 116 1144 44 23 633 100 50 75 148 46 103 86
------------1---------------ll---------------l J---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module:
sat/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1900 1800 1800 1900 1800 1800
Adjustment: 0 .33 0.97 1.10 0.19 0.92 1.08 0.49 0.77 0 .73 0.51 0 .91 0 .83
Lanes: 1.00 1.93 0.07 1.00 1 .76 0.24 0.51 0.49 1.00 0.41 0 .59 1 .00
Final Sat.: 589 3378 130 343 2934 463 454 690 1317 392 855 1496
------------1---------------11---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.20 0.34 0.34 0.07 0 .22 0.22 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.06
Crit Moves: ****
Green/Cycle: 0.66 0.66
Volume/Cap: 0.30 0.51
Delay/Veh: 7,5 9.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 7.5 8.7
LOS by Move: A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 9
0.66
0.51
9.7
1 .00
9.7
A
10
0.66 0.66
0.10 0.32
6.2 7.3
1.00 1.00
6.2 7.3
A A
0 5
0.66
0.32
7.3
1.00
7.3
A
5
0.24 0.24
0 .47 0.47
34.1 34.1
1.00 1. 00
34.1 34.1
c c
3 4
0.24
0.49
34 .o
1.00
34.0
c
4
••••
0.24 0.24
0.51 0.51
34.7 34.7
1.00 1.00
34.7 34 .7
c c
4 5
0.24
0.24
31.3
1 .00
31 .3
c
2
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Traffix 9.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TRANSTECH, WALNUr, CA
~. -------------~ ~-CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
~~~ Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 32 of 34
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE
Attachment 7: LOS Calculations for Afternoon Peak
MITIG8 -Existing AFT Peak Thu May 3 1 2016 10:45:29
Temple City School Circulation Assessment
Existing conditions
AFT Peak
Level Of service computation Report
2000 IICM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Page 1-1
Intersection #1 Temple City Blvd/Lemon Ave
********************************************************************************
Cycle (~ec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
10
30
Critical Vol./Cap.(X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
Street Name: Temple City Blvd Lemon Ave
0.356
11.2
B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -'l' -R L -T - R L T R L -T -R
------------r---------------rr---------------ll---------------lr---------------1
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights : Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
------------1---------------ll ---------------ll ---------------ll ---------------l
Volume Module:aft peak
Base Vol: 57 474 22 44 741 66 39 60 99 21 44 24
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 57 474 22 44 741 66 39 60 99 21 44 24
Added Vol: 0 o 0 o o 0 o o 0 o o o
PasserByVo1: 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0
Initial Fut: 57 474 22 44 741 66 39 60 99 21 44 24
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00
PHF Volume : 57 474 22 44 741 66 39 60 99 21 44 24
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 57 474 22 44 741 66 39 60 99 21 44 24
PCE Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1. 00 L 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 57 474 22 44 741 66 39 60 99 21 44 24
------------1 ---------------11-----------~~--11---------------1 1---------------1
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Adjustment: 0.30 0.97 1 .10 0.44 0.93 1.09 0.52 0.81 0.79 0.54 0,84 0.85
Lanes: 1 .00 1.92 0.06 1.00 1.86 0.14 0.50 0.50 1.00 0.43 0.57 1.00
Final Sat.: 543 3352 156 783 3120 278 472 726 1427 416 871 1530
------------l---------------ll ---------------lt ---------------ll---------------1
Capacity Analysis Module :
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.06 0.24 0.24 0.08 0 .08 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.02
Crit Moves: ***" **"*
Green/Cycle : 0 .67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0 .23
Vol~/Cap: 0.16 0.21 0.21 o.oe 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.30 0.22 0.22 0.07
De1ay/Veh: 6.4 6.5 6.5 5.9 7 .3 7.3 32 .9 32.9 32 .2 31 .4 31.4 30.0
User De1Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh : 6.4 6 ,5 6.5 5.9 1.3 7.3 32.9 32.9 32.2 31 .4 31.4 30.0
LOS by Move: A A A A A A C C C C C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 3 3 1 5 6 2 3 3 1 2 1
··········································••*****••······················•***•••
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TRANSTECU, WALNUT, CA
~:------------------------------------------~------~------C_IT_Y_O~F~T_E_M~P~L~E ~C~IT~Y
~~~ Prepared By : Transte ch Engineers, In c. I Page 33 of 34
TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFI C ANALYSIS FO CUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT
(1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2 ) TRELAWNEY AVENUE
Attachment 8: LOS Calculations for PM Peak
MITIG8 -Existing PH Peak Thu May 3 , 2018 11:03:21
Temple City Scho ol Circulation Assessment
Existing Cond i tions
PM Peak
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alte rnative)
Page 1-1
······~········································································· Intersection il Temple City Blvd/Lemon Ave
cycle (sec):
Loss Time (sec):
Optimal Cycle:
100
10
33
Critical Vol ./Cap.(X):
Average Delay (sec/veh):
Level Of Service:
0.435
6 .8
A
·····································*···································******* Street Name: Temple City Blvd Lemon Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T R L -T -R L -T -R
------------1---------------ll---------------ll---------------l 1---------------1
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Riqhts: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 l 0 0 l 0 1 0 0 1
------------1---------------ll ---------------ll ---------------l 1---------------1
Volume Module:PM Peak
Base Vol: 52 616 21 47 1098 55 26 34 57 10 27 29
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00
Ini tial Sse: 52 616 21 47 1098 55 26 34 57 10 27 29
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0
f?asserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 52 616 21 47 1098 55 26 34 57 10 27 29
User Adj: 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 52 616 21 47 1098 55 26 34 57 10 27 29
Re duct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 52 616 21 47 1098 55 26 34 57 10 27 29
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 52 616 21 47 1098 55 26 34 57 10 27 29
------------1 ---------------ll ---------------ll --------~------ll ---------------l
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1600 1800
Adjustment: 0.22 0.97 1.10 0.38 0 .94 1 .10 0.51 0.80 0.79 0.55 0.86 0.85
Lanes: 1 .00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.92 0.08 0 .54 0.46 1.00 0.37 0.63 1 .00
Final Sat.: 400 3394 116 688 3236 162 502 657 1427 364 984 1530
------------t---------------ll ---------------ll ---------------ll---------------1
Capacity ~alysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0 .13 0.18 0.18 0.07 0.34 0.34 0.05 0 .05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02
Crit Moves:
Green/Cycle:
Volume/Cap:
De1ay/Veh:
User DelAdj:
AdjDel/Veh:
LOS by Move :
HCM2kAvqQ:
0.78 0.78
0.17 0.23
3.0 3 .0
1.00 1.00
3.0 3.0
A A
1 3
0.79
0.23
3.0
1.00
3.0
A
3
.....
0.78 0 .79
0.09 0.43
2.6 3.7
1.00 1.00
2.6 3.7
A A
0 6
0.78
0.43
3.7
1.00
3 .7
A
7
.....
0.12 0.12
0.43 0.43
43.1 43.1
1.00 1. 00
43.1 43.1
D D
2 3
0 .12
0 .34
41.6
1.00
41.6
D
2
0 .12 0 .12
0.23 0.23
40.6 40.6
1.00 1.00
40.6 40.6
D D
1 1
0.12
0 .16
40.0
1.00
40.0
D
1
·············•••*****•••·································•*•*************•••••••
Traffix 8.0 .0715 (C) 2008 Dowling Assoc . License d to TRANSTECH, WALNUT, CA
~ CITY OF TEMPLE CITY ~'--------
• Prepared By : Transt ec h Engin eers, Inc. I Page 34 of 34