The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About12) 8B TCHS Focused Traffic Engineering Analysis at Intersection of Lemon Ave and Temple City Blvd and Lemon Ave and Trelawney AveAGENDA ITEM 8.8. MANAGEMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: December 18,2018 TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Bryan Cook , City Manager By: Bryan Ariizumi, Public Safety Supervisor SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING -TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL FOCUSED TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AND TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND LEMON AVENUE AND TRELAWNEY AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: The City Council is requested to : 1. Hold a public hearing regarding the removal of the east leg crosswalk on Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue; 2. Adopt Resolution No. 18-5374 (Attachment "A"), approving the traffic and pedestrian safety measures recommended by Transtech; and 3. Approve a budget amendment in the amount of $44 ,000 to implement the approved traffic and pedestrian safety measures. BACKGROUND: 1. On December 8, 2017, during the "Lights on Temple City Event", the Youth Committee conducted a pedestrian safety survey to obtain feedback from the community on what locations the city should focus on for traffic improvements affecting all modes of transportation (i.e ., walking, cycling, and driving). 2. On December 14, 2017, the Youth Committee hosted a "Quality of Life Pop-Up Event" to resume discussing concerns residents expressed at the Lights of Temple City Event. 3. On January 24, 2018, the Youth Committee provided a presentation to the Transportation and Public Safety Commission regarding pedestrian and traffic safety that focused on traffic issues at the intersections of Lemon Avenue at Temple City Boulevard and . Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue . The Commission directed staff to work with the City's contract traffic engineer City Council December 18, 2018 Page 2 of 4 (Transtech) and the Youth Committee to discuss the concerns and options for the two intersections and return to the Commission with recommended improvements. 4. On February 22, 2018, Transtech hosted a workshop for the Youth Committee and discussed traffic engineering report preparation and thresholds for implementation as found in the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) or the California Vehicle Code (CVC). The Youth Committee introduced some proposed traffic and pedestrian safety measures and discussed the requirements and potential effects of the proposed improvements. Following the discussion City staff directed Transtech to conduct a traffic analysis of existing conditions and potential traffic improvements around Temple City High School. 5. On March 15, 2018, Transtech conducted a 24-hour traffic volume count on Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue and a 24-hour radar speed survey on Lemon Avenue. 6. On April 5, 2018, Transtech and Youth Committee members conducted pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular turning movement counts at the intersections of Lemon Avenue at Temple City Boulevard and Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue. 7. On May 4, 2018, Transtech prepared a report (Attachment "B") presenting the results and recommendations of their traffic engineering analysis. 8. On June 13, 2018, at its regularly scheduled meeting, the Transportation and Public Safety Commission reviewed the focused traffic engineering analysis prepared by Transtech and recommend that it be brought before the City Council for review and approval. 9. On November 6, 2018, the City Council reviewed the focused traffic engineering analysis prepared by Transtech and selected Option 2 for the intersection of Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue (Attachments "C" and "D"). 10. On November 7, 2018, the public hearing notice (Attachment "E") was posted at the east leg crosswalk of Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue, inviting input on the proposed crosswalk removal. 11. On December 6, 2018, the public hearing notice was published in the Temple City Tribune. ANALYSIS: At the November 6, 2018 City Council meeting, the City Council considered the proposed traffic and pedestrian safety improvements at the intersections of Lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard and Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue and <;eJected Option 2 for the intersection of Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue. City Council December 18, 2018 Page 3 of 4 The following is a summary of the proposed traffic control measures recommended by Transtech: Lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard (page 23 of Attachment "B") • Install "stay back lines" I "yield lines" approaching all crosswalks; • Install pedestrian push buttons for pedestrians crossing north and south, matching the style of the existing east/west crossing push buttons; • Install updated push button signage at all push buttons; and • Increase time for pedestrians to cross at Temple City Boulevard with pedestrians crossing a few seconds before vehicles are given a green. Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue (pages 24 & 25 of Attachment "B") • Option 2: Remove the existing east leg crosswalk and install a new crosswalk in the west leg to better accommodate the large number of students using the crosswalk coming from the west side of Trelawney Avenue. There is a larger landing pad area and sidewalks leading up to the ramp. This option will also reduce the number of vehicle movements crossing over the crosswalk, thereby reducing the conflict with pedestrians in the crosswalk. The following improvements would have to be implemented for this option: o Full removal of the existing east leg crosswalk (sand blast); o Removal of all pedestrian signagelposts; o Reconstruction of the existing east leg curb ramp on the north side of Lemon Avenue to a regular curb; o Install a new yellow ladder stripped crosswalk in the west leg; o Construct a new ADA compliant curb ramp with truncated domes on the north side of Lemon Avenue; o Install pedestrian signage removed from the east leg crosswalk; o Install Double Sided Pedestrian Activated Flashing Beacons on top of Pedestrian crossing signs; o Outline the existing yellow ladder crosswalk in the south leg and the new yellow ladder crosswalk in the west leg with highly reflective yellow raised pavement markers (RPM); o Install shark teeth yield lines 30-feet in advance of the crosswalk for westbound and eastbound travelers; o Install corresponding "YIELD HERE FOR PEDS" signs (R1-5) adjacent to proposed yield lines for westbound and eastbound travelers; o Install a "stay back line" I "yield line" approaching the south leg crosswalk; o Purchase two new YIELD to pedestrian in-road signs (R1-6b) to be placed at each crosswalk by school staff during school hours; o Install approximately 70' of red curb west of the new west leg crosswalk and 76' of red curb east of the new west leg crosswalk on the north side and south sides of Lemon Avenue; and o Install 20' of red curb from the base of the curb ramp on the east and west sides of Trelawney Avenue. City Council December 18, 2018 Page 4 of 4 In accordance with the California Vehicle Code (CVC), a public hearing notice was posted at the east leg crosswalk, inviting any interested persons to provide input on the proposed crosswalk removal. CITY STRATEGIC GOALS: Implementation of the traffic and pedestrian safety measures around Temple City High School furthers the City's Strategic Goal of Public Health and Safety. FISCAL IMPACT: Transtech estimates the cost for improvements for Lemon Avenue at 1) Temple City Boulevard and at 2) Trelawney Avenue (Option 2) is about $44,000. If the City Council approves the proposed safety measures, a budget amendment in the amount of $44,000 will be necessary as funds have not been appropriated in the Fiscal Year 2018-19 City Budget. ATTACHMENTS: A. Resolution No. 18-5374 B. Transtech Report dated May 4, 2018 C. City Council Staff Report dated November 6, 2018 D. Minutes of the November 6, 2018 City Council Meeting E. Crosswalk Removal Public Hearing Notice ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO. 18-5374 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPROVING THE TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY MEASURES AT LEMON AVENUE AND TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND LEMON AVENUE AND TRELAWNEY AVENUE WHEREAS, The City Council recognizes residents and business owners in the City may be impacted by excess motor vehicle traffic and parking congestion; WHEREAS, Division 11, Chapter 9, Section 22507, subsection "A" of the California Vehicle Code authorizes local authorities to prohibit or restrict the stopping, parking, or standing of vehicles on certain streets or portions thereof, during all or certain hours of the day; WHEREAS, the proposed traffic and pedestrian safety measures are consistent with all local, state and federal regulations. WHEREAS, the traffic and pedestrian safety improvements will help ensure the safety of motorists and pedestrians around Temple City High School. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Public Safety Supervisor is hereby authorized to remove, erect or install the following signage or other appropriate markings at the intersections of Lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard and Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue: Lemon Avenue and Temple Citv Boulevard a) Install "stay back lines" I "yield line" approaching all crosswalks in each leg; b) Install pedestrian push buttons for pedestrians crossing north and south, making sure to match the existing style of the existing push buttons for the east/west crosswalks; c) Install updated push button signage at all push buttons; and d) Increase the time for pedestrians to cross Temple City Boulevard with pedestrians crossing a few seconds before vehicles are given a green light. Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue a) Full removal of the existing east leg crosswalk (sand blast); b) Removal of all pedestrian signagelposts; c) Reconstruction of the existing east leg curb ramp on the north side of Lemon Avenue to a regular curb; d) Install a new yellow ladder stripped crosswalk in the west leg; e) Construct a new ADA compliant curb ramp with truncated domes on the north side of Lemon Avenue; f) Install pedestrian signage removed from the east leg crosswalk; g) Install Double Sided Pedestrian Activated Flashing Beacons on top of Pedestrian crossing signs; h) Outline the existing yellow ladder crosswalk in the south leg and the new yellow ladder crosswalk in the west leg with highly reflective yellow raised pavement markers (RPM); i) Install shark teeth yield lines 30-feet in advance of the crosswalk for westbound and eastbound travelers; j) Install corresponding "YIELD HER FOR PEDS" signs (R1-5) adjacent to proposed yield lines for westbound and eastbound travelers; k) Install a "stay back line" I "yield line" approaching the south leg crosswalk; Resolution No. 18-537 4 Page 2 I) Purchase two new YIELD to pedestrian in-road signs (R1-6b) to be placed at each crosswalk by school staff during school hours; m) Install approximately 70' of red curb west of the new west leg crosswalk and 76' of red curb east of the new west leg crosswalk on the north side and south sides of Lemon Avenue; and n) Install 20' of red curb from the base of the curb ramp on the east and west sides of Trelawney Avenue. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on this 18th day of December 2018 William Man, Mayor ATTEST: Peggy Kuo, City Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution, Resolution No. 18-5374, was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Temple City at a regular meeting held on the 18'" day of December 2018, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Councilmember- Councilmember- Councilmember- Councilmember- Peggy Kuo, City Clerk TO: FROM: DATE: TRANSTECh City ofTemple City Tran s portation & Public Safety Commission Temple City Youth Committee Transtech Engineers, Inc. May4, 2018 ATTACHMENT 8 SUBJECT: TEMPLE CITY HIGH SC HOOL FOCUSED TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE INTRODUCTION On behalf of the City of Temple City, and at the request of the Temple Ci t y Youth Committee and direction from th e Te mple City Tran s portation and Public Safety Commission, Transtech Engineers, Inc. has completed a traffic analysis and circulation study around Temple City Hi gh Sc h ool focusing o n the intersections of (1) Lemon Avenue at Temple City Boulevard and (2) Lemon Avenue at Tre lawney Avenue. This study evaluates and recommends various traffic measures to i m prove ove r all vehicular and pedestrian safety ba se d on field observations, data co llection, California Manual Of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) guid e lines, and the Ca lifornia Vehicle Code (CVC). Please refer to Figure 1: Vicinity Map of Study Area b e low. Figure 1: Vicinity Map of Subject Intersections LEGEND I":\ Lemon Aven ue and Temple City Boulevard \!I • Signalized Intersection • Marked crosswalks in all legs • Crosswalks are yellow ladder striped Lemon Avenue is a l oca l roadway Temple City Boul evard is cla ss ified as a Primary road Lemon Avenue Posted Speed Limit: 30 mph with 25 mph school zone • Templ e Ci ty Bou l evard Posted Speed Lim it: 35 mph with 25 mph school zone 0 Lemon Avenu e and Trelawney Avenue Stop controlled In the south leg (SL) • Marked crosswalks in south leg (SL) and east leg (EL) Crosswa lks are yellow ladder striped Trelawney Ave is a residential roadway Trelawney Ave Prima Facie Speed Limit: 25 m ph 0 Temple Ci ty High School 0 Ci ty of Temple City Border • CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By : Transt ec h Engi neers, In c. I Page 1 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE BACKGROUND On behalf of the City of Temple City, Transtech Engineers, Inc. (Traffic Engineering Consultant Staff) has collaborated with the Temple City Youth Committee as well as the Transportation and Public Safety Commiss ion to promote Pede strian, Cyclist, and Driver Safety at various City events, commission meetings, and workshops. This included brochure handouts with safety information for the different roadway use rs (Pedestrians, Cyclists, and Drivers), surveys distributed to the community to iden t ify traffic concerns around the City, and a traffic engineering workshop focu sed on various aspects of traffic engineering when evaluating an area for improvements. The following is a summary list of the various events that were hosted collaboratively between Temple City You th Committee, Temp le City Transportation and Public Safety Commission, and Tr anstech Engin eers, Inc. focused on Pedestrian, Cyclist, and Driver Safety: Lights on Temple City Event (December 8, 2017) On Friday, De cembe r 8, 2017, the City held their annual tree lighting event known as "Lights on Temple City" at Temple City Park on Las Tunas Drive. The Temple City Youth Committee hosted a booth that focused on pedestrian safety and included surveys for the community to fill out re lated to the t ypes of traffic improvements they would like to see around the City, their frequency of using different modes of transportation (walking, cycling, driving), and other traffic related question s. T rans tech staff also attended and assisted by passing out Pedestrians, Cyclists, and Drivers Safety bro ch u res to the community. Quality of Life Pop-Up Event (December 14, 2017) On Thursda y, December 14, 2017, the Temple City Youth Committee hosted a Quality of Life Pop-Up event at the Temple City Library. Transtech staff, School District Staff, Sherriff, and others participated in an open discussion panel about the meaning oftraffic safety, persona l experiences with traffic and potential improvements that could be made in the City. All participants expres se d what types of improvements they would like to see around the City and the Temple City High School area. Some of the topics discussed included cell phone use while walking, cycl ists not being aware of the road rules, traffic signal wait times, and speeding. Temple City Transportation and Public Safety Commission Meeting (January 24, 2018) To continue the theme and based on community feedback from the two prior events of Pedestrian, Cyclist, and Driver Safety, two presentation s were given at the Transportation and Public Safety Commission Meeting. The first was given by Tran stec h staff relating to the various rules and roles official traffic control plays on roads from a Pedestrian, Cyclist, and Driver standpoint which included sa fety tips. The second presentation was given by the Temple City Youth Committee based on feedback they recei ve d from the co mmunity. The presentation focused around Temple City High School, specifically at the intersections of (1) Lemon Avenue at Temple City Boulevard and (2) Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue. At that time the Transportation and Public Safety Commission Meeting directed traffic engineering staff to meet se parately with the Youth Committee to go over the preferred study area. ~ CITY OF TEMPLE CITY ~~------- Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, In c. I Page 2 of 34 • TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFF IC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Temple City Youth Committee Workshop (February 22, 2018) At the d i rect io n of City St aff and Temple City Tran sportation and Public Safety Com m ission, Transtec h staff hos t ed a wo rk shop with the Temple City Yo uth Co mm ittee going over the specific traffic concerns that they brought up at prior event s regard in g the area ar o und Temple City High School. The workshop hig hlighted what goes into preparing a traffic engineerin g r eport and the vario us items that r ecommendations are based on suc h as existing co nditions, traffic coun t s, field observa ti o ns, acc id en t history, etc. Th e work shop was also an open discussion and reviewed the po ss ible optio ns/projects address ing the conce rn s the youth committ ee had around Tem pl e City Hi g h School. The goal of the workshop was to narrow the possible improveme nts that (1) the City wou ld financially be able to undertake and (2) potentially meet thresholds for imp leme ntation as found in the CAMUTCD or CVC, and (3) i mprove the overall safet y of t he main intersect ion a round t he schoo l. Some of the measures introduced by the You th Committee were; a raised crosswa l k at Tre lawney Avenue, street narrowing on Temple City Blvd, signal improvements to protect pedestrians at the Temple City Boulevard and Lemon Ave nu e intersection as we ll as park ing changes aroun d th e ar ea t o im prove visi bility of pedestrians on Lemon Ave nu e. From th ere th e City direct ed eng in eering co nsult in g st aff to conduct a t raffic ana lys is of exist in g cond iti o ns and potentia l traffic im proveme nts. Traffic Count Collection (Apri l 5, 2018) Due to weather cons tra ints and schedu lin g arou nd spr ing break, pedestrian and ve hic ular traffic coun t s and field obse r va tions were co ll ected Thursday, April 5, 2018 . Stud ents part of the Temple City Youth Committ ee a lso participated in the counts. The counts were taken at t he following times and locations: Count Times: 1. AM Cou nt : 6:45AM -8:45AM (2 hour co un t) 2. AFT Count: 1:45PM-3 :30PM (1.5 hour cou nt) 3. PM Co unt: 4:0 0P M-5:30PM (1.5 hour count) Count Locations: 1. Lemon Aven ue and Temple City Bou levard 2. Lemo n Aven ue and Trelawney Aven ue ANALYSIS Existing Conditions Assessment: The City directed Tra f fic Engineerin g Consulting staff to conduct an assessment of existing co nditions and come up with reco mm endations that wo uld alleviate traffic congestion a nd im prove pedest ri an safety duri ng the peak AM drop-off, AFT pick-up times, and PM co mmute times arou nd Temp le Ci t y High Sc hoo l focusing on the fo llowing two intersect ions: 1. Lemon Aven ue and Temple City Boulevard 2. Lemon Aven ue an d Trelawney Aven u e Commu ni t ies often tailor a co m bination of st rateg ies including engineering, enforcement, education, and encouragement to address specific ne eds of eac h sc hoo l as we ll as oth er stakeho ld ers. In order to co me ~~--------------------------------------------------------CI_T_Y _O_F~T_E _M_P_lE_C_I_T_Y Prepared By: Tran stech Engineers, Inc. I Page 3 o f 34 ill TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRA FFI C ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT TH E IN TE RS ECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOU LEVARD AND AT (2} TRELAWNE Y AVEN UE up wit h th e most ap pr o pri at e a nd sui ta bl e so lutio n it is im po rta nt t o identify the root ca use of t he issue. Th e d evelopment of a success ful schoo l circ ulation prog ram r eq u i res commun ity support and in p ut as well as th e supp o rt of sc hoo l district r ep r esen t atives and decis io n m ake rs to ensu r e t hat all stakeholders are re prese nted. While schoo l t ra ffi c du ri ng pea k d r o p-off and pick-up t imes is unavo idable, t her e a re mitiga tio n meas ures t hat can be impl emen t ed t o ease t he t ra ffi c congest io n and im prove t he sa f et y and ci r culation of t he ar ea. It is also impo rt ant t o e du ca t e co mmunity members of t he type of m itigatio n m eas ures that are appropriat e a nd why oth er improvem e nts may not be success ful fo r t his part i cular scena ri o. Streets serve m ultiple use rs an d modes of t rans portatio n including passenger cars, pedestrians, bicycles, buses, and Emerge ncy Serv ice veh icles. As a res ult, measu r es use d to affect the way vehicles operate o n a street m ay also affect oth er users. Pot entia l im pact s to ot her m odes of travel needs t o be cons ide r ed to min imize o r p reve nt u nint e nded conseq ue nces . Please r ef er to the Figure 2 be low for a detailed existing co nditions d i ag ram. LEGEND 0 l emon Avenue and Templ e City Boulevard • Signa lized Intersection • Mar ked crosswalks in all legs • Crosswa l ks are ye llow l adde r striped • Lemon Avenue i s a loca l r oadway • Temple City Bo uleva r d is classified as a Pri mary road • Lemon Avenue Posted Sp ee d Li m it: 30 mph • Templ e City Bo ul evard Posted Speed Limit : 35 mph 0 l em o n Avenue and Trel awney Av enue A • Stop co ntrolled in t he south leg (SL) N • M arked crosswa l ks in south leg (S L) and east leg (EL) • Crosswa lks are ye llow ladd er stri ped • Tre lawney Ave is a r esidenti al roadway • Tre lawney Ave Pr ima Fac i e Speed Limit: 25 mph l emon Ave betwe en Oak Ave and Te mple City Bl vd: Posted speed li mit signs : Pavement l egends: • 30 mph (For EB • "S LOW SCHOOL XING" l egends (Both travel o nly) di rections) • 25 mph sc hool sign • Share the Road Bicycle l ege nds (Both (Both directions) directions) • SW24-3 "AHEAD" signs approaching crosswalk in EL l e mon Av enu e: Lemon Ave nu e is approxi mately 38' (feet) i n w i dth w ith one lane in each direction and a d ashed ye llow ce nter lin e. On th e no rt h sid e of Lemo n Ave nu e is Temp le City High Schoo l. Lemon Aven ue has a posted sc hool spee d lim it sign of 25 MP H for wes t bo und a nd east bound t ravelers as we ll as a spee d l im it sig n of 30 MPH for east bo un d t rave le rs on ly. Alo ng the north si de of Lemon Avenue, entering Lemon Ave nu e f ro m Tem pl e City Bo ul eva rd is ap p rox im at e ly 50-feet of reg u lar curb space with a posted sig n that reads "1 HOUR PARK IN G 7:00A M -5:00PM". Prece ding the reg ular curb space with park in g res trictio ns of 1-ho ur is intermitte nt w hite curb w it h pa rkin g sig ns of "3 MIN LOADI NG ZO N E 7:00AM to 5:0 0P M " o n CITY O F TEMPLE CITY • Prepared By: Tr anstech Engi nee r s, In c. I Page 4 of 34 TE M PLE CITY HIG H SCH OOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT TH E INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVEN UE AT {1) TEMPLE CITY BOUL EVARD AND AT {2) TRELAWNEY AVEN UE sc hoo l d ays. Wes t of t he schoo l p ar ki ng lot , the parkin g co nd iti o ns t hen c h ange to "NO PARK ING 7:00AM -5:00PM SC HOO L DAYS" with o ut a pe r mit. Parki ng con ditio ns along t h e south side of Lemon Avenue are "NO PARK IN G 7:0 0AM -5:00PM SC HOO L DAYS" with o ut a perm it. Lemon Ave nue at Trelawney Aven u e is st op co ntro ll ed on ly i n t he so uth leg and un co ntro lled i n th e eas t leg. Du r ing 7 :30-9 :00AM and 2:00- 3:30P M on Sc ho ol d ays the NB lef t tu rn moveme nt is pro hibit e d. The re is o n ly permit pa r k ing along Tre law ney Ave nu e o n sc hoo l d ays 7:00A M -5:00 PM . At Te mpl e City Bo ul evard and Le mo n Ave nu e, t he inte rsectio n is sign alized wit h yel low lad d er c rosswa lks in all legs. Alo ng Lem on Aven ue between Temp le City Bo uleva r d and Oak Avenue, there are schoo l SW24- 3 "AHEAD" signs wit h "SLOW SC HOOL XING" lege nds opposite th e signs approach ing the crosswalk on the east leg at th e inte rsec tio n w it h Tre lawney Ave nue. Th ere is additional signage and legends informing roa d users t o sh are t h e road wit h bicycl ist s and pedestrians. Lemon Avenue has no sidewa l ks along the south side of the roadway be t ween Tem pl e City Bo u leva rd and Oak Avenue. Land use is comprised of single-f ami ly homes and public faci l ities. On t he northwest co r ner of Lemon Avenue and Temple City Bou levard is t he Te m p le City High Sc hoo l. Figure 4: Stree t vi ew of the existing yellow ladd er cross walks outlined w i th RPM's in all legs at the intersection of l emon Avenue at Te Blvd (WB CITY OF TEMPL E CITY Prepared By : Transtech Enginee rs, Inc. I Pa ge 5 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYS IS FOCUSED AT THE INTERS ECTI ONS OF LE MON AVE NUE AT (1) TEMPLE CIT Y BOUL EVARD AND AT (2) TRE LAWN EY AVE NU E Figure 5: Street view of Lemon Avenue towards Trelawney Avenue (WB Direction). School staff places cones in the street school hours. r--------------------~----r------------m~ Figure 6: Existing yellow ladder cros swalks in the south and east leg at the intersection of Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue (WB Direction). School staff places cones and in-road pedestrian signs before school and after school let out. Figure 7: Street view of Lemon Avenue towards Trelawney Avenue (EB Direction). Bu se s p ark along Lemon Ave for after school ort teams. Figure 8: Existing Parking Conditions Along Lemon Avenue between Temple City Blvd and Oak Ave -The No Parking signs also had a "without permit" below which indicates residents are allowed to park on the CIT Y OF TEMPLE CITY Pr e pared By: T r anstech Engineers, Inc. I Page 6 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Figure 9: Existing Parking Conditions Along lemon Avenue between Temple City Blvd and Oak Ave south side and partially on north side-The No Parking signs also have a "without permit" below which indicates residents are allowed to park on the street in specified areas. Temple City Boulevard : Temple City Boulevard is approximately 64' (feet) in width with two lanes in each direction with left turn pockets. The posted speed limit on Temple City Boulevard is 35 mph except during school hours and times. There are two posted school speed limit sig ns for northbound and southbound travelers in addition to the 35 MPH speed limit sign along Temple City Boulevard. At this location, Temple City Boulevard is classified as a primary roadway with single family homes along the east side of the roadway and publicfacilities along the west side of the roadway. West ofTemple City Boulevard is Temple City High School. Parking is permitted on both sides of the street in marked spaces. All directions of the signalized intersection have pedestrian count down signals with a white pedestrian symbol indicating pedestrians to proceed changing to a flashing hand with a time count. There are pedestrian buttons to activate the countdown only for pedestrians crossing east to west. The pedestrian signals for pedestrians crossing north to south are automatic with no pedestrian buttons. All directions of left turn traffic mu st yield to oncoming traffic and is considered as "permitted" timing. Temple City Boulevard as a primary arterial is designed to carry a significant amount of commuter traffic. By keeping through traffic moving or flowing along these main arterials serves to limit or minimize cut-through traffic onto adjacent residentia I streets. Figure 10: Street view of the existing yellow ladder crosswalks outlined with RPM's in all legs at the intersection of Te Blvd at lemon Avenue ~---=-~=::~~=--~ ~~-----------------------------------------------------C_IT_Y_O __ FT_E_M_P_l_E_C_IT_Y • Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Pag e 7 of 34 TEMPlE CITY HIGH SCHOOl TRAFFIC ANAlYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF lEMON AVENUE AT (1} TEMPlE CITY BOUlEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Figure 11: Street view of the existing yellow ladder crosswalks outlined with RPM's in all legs at the intersection of Temple City Blvd at lemon Avenue {NB Direction). The placement of RPM's along crosswalks serves to increase nighttime visibility of crossing pedestrians. Figure 12: Pedestrian Countdown Figure 13: Push Button-Street Box. Note: All school age view of the existing pedestrian bicyclists rode on sidewalk. signal and pedestrian buttons. ~-----,·==~----~ Figure 14: Parking Restriction signage on lemon Avenue Trelawney Avenue: Trelawney Avenue is approximately 38' (feet) in width with one lane in each direction separated by a dashed yellow center line. The intersection of Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue is stop controlled in the south leg (SL) with yellow ladder striped marked crosswalks in the south leg (SL) and east leg (EL). The east leg crosswalk is uncontrolled. A crossing guard was present during peak AM and AFT hours. Trelawney Avenue is a residential roadway with a prima facie speed limit of 25 mph. Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue is stop controlled only in the south leg. There are no sidewalks leading from the curb return in ·the southeast corner down Trelawney Avenue or on Lemon Avenue. No northbound left turns are allowed from Trelawney Avenue onto Lemon Avenue during peak school hours (7:30AM to 9:00AM and 2:00PM to 3:30PM School Days). ~~----------------------------------------~-----------C_I _TY_O __ F ~TE_M_P_L_E_C_IT_Y ~~~ Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 8 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENU E AT (1) TEMP LE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Figure 15 : Street view of the existing yellow ladder crosswalks in the south and east legs at lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue (EB Direction). Figure 16: Street view of the existing southeast corner with narrow landing pad for pedestrians with no sidewalks as well as the turn for NB left turners du k school hours. Figure 17: Street view of the existing yellow ladder crosswalks in the south and east legs at lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue (WB Direction • ~~-----------~~~~~~--~r-~~~~~.-~ CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By : Transtech Engine ers, Inc. I Page 9 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOO L TRAFFIC ANALYS IS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1 ) TEM PLE CITY BOULEVARD AN D AT (2) TREIAWNEY AVENUE Fig ure 18: Stree t view of the ex isting y ellow ladder cro ss w alk in the south leg at l emon Av enu e and Tre l awney Avenu e (NB Di rection). School staf f pl aces the in -road signs an d con es in t he AM and AFT hours before the bell ri Ave rag e Dai ly Traffic (ADT): Da ily ve hicle co u nt s were co nducted t o det e rm ine the average dai ly traffic on a typica l weekd ay trave lin g on Lemo n Avenue and Tre lawney Aven u e. Based on the 24-hour t ube co unts, Le m o n Ave nu e has an AD T of 2,987 ve hi cles pe r d ay. Additi o na ll y, 24-hour t ube co un ts were taken on Tre lawney Ave nu e. Tre lawney Ave nue has an ADT of 573 ve hi cles per day. Per the Temple Ci t y Zoning Map, land use in t he subject area is considered sing le-fami ly residentia l with pu blic faci l ities. ADTs were co ll ected on Thursday, Ma rch 15, 2018. Please refer to Table 1: Average Daily Traffic (ADT). Table 1: Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Date Counts Coll ecte d: Thursd ay, M ar ch 15, 2018 Lo ca tion Total Vehicles Per Day l emo n Ave W/0 Tre lawney Ave 2,98 7 Trelawney Ave S/0 Lemon Ave 573 Veh i cle Pea k Hou r Turning Movem ent: To det ermine t he amo unt of confl ict i ng and turn ing traffic that occ urs at the i nte rsecti o ns of (1) Lemo n Ave nue at Tem pl e City Bo ulevard and (2) Lemon Ave nue at Tre law ney Aven u e. Turn i ng movemen t co un ts we re co nd ucted as fo ll ows: Table 2: Vehicle Peak Hour Turning Movement Count Information Count Dat e Count Tim e Cou nt locations Thursday, 1. AM Co u nt: 6:45AM -8 :45AM (2 hou r count) 1. Lemon Avenue and Temple Apri l 5, 2018 2. AFT Co un t: 1:45PM -3:30PM (1.5 hou r co unt) City Boulevard 3. PM Count : 4 :00PM-5 :3 0PM (1.5 hour co unt) 2. l emon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue CITY OF TEM PLE CITY Prepared By: Transt ec h Engineers, Inc. I Page 10 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2 ) TRELAWN EY AVENUE The turning movement diagram s below present the highe st amount of traffic for eac h 1-hour study period. Th e hou rs for the counts were taken during what is cons idered as "industry standard count times" and reflects commuter traffic as well as sc hool traffi c based on the school start and end times . FIGURE 19-A Turning Movement Diagrams Temple City Blvd & Lemon Ave t,} 7:45a.m. to 8:45a.m. 0 M 0 M M rl W N )~\. so _I 75 )o 148 ~ "-. 86 c 103 r 46 ~j(' FIGURE 20-A Turning Movement Diagrams Trelawney Ave & Lemon Ave t,} 7:45a.m. to 8:45a.m. 114 )o 40 ~ FIGURE 19-B Turning Movement Diagrams t,} Temple City Blvd & Lemon Ave 13:45 to 14:45 "' "-.31 M MOl Ill \ON )~\. c 37 r19 ------ 28 _1 ~j(' 24 )o 55 ~ M W N ClOMN Ill FIGURE 20-B Turning Movement Diagrams Trelawney Ave & Lemon Ave t,} 14:45 to 15:45 c 157 r22 -- )o ~ (' 140 38 ~ N "' q- FIGURE 19-C Turning Movement Diagrams Temple City Blvd & Lemon Ave 16:00 to 17:00 ClO "--29 "' Ill 0 " Ill .... q- )~\.. c 27 r10 --- 26 _} ~j( 34 • 57 ~ N \0 .... Ill .... N \0 FIGURE 20-C Turning Movement Di agrams Tre lawn ey Ave & Lemon Ave 16:00 to 17:00 c 117 r 14 - 96 • ~ ( 11~ .... M ..... It was suggested at the commission meeting that one of the options for the intersection of Tem pie City Bou levard at Lemon Avenue could be the installation of protected left turn phasing for all directions. Since separate signal phases for protected left turns w ill reduce the green t i me available for other phases, the CAMUTCD (Section 4D.19) prov ides thresholds and guidelines to follow before placing protected left turn phasing. Guidance: Protected left turn phases should be considered where such alternatives couldn't be utilized, and one or more of the following conditions exist: 1. Collisions -Five or more left turn collisions for a particular left turn movement during a recent 12- month period. NOT MET ~ CITY OF TEMPLE CITY ~~------- • Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 11 of 34 ~ ~ TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFI C A NALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE I NTER SEC TIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE 2. Delay-Left-turn d elay of one o r more veh icles, w hi ch we re waiting at the begi nni ng of the gree n interval and are still remaining in th e left turn lane after at least 80% of the total number of cycles for one hour. NOT MET 3. Vo lume -At new intersec t ions w here only estimated vo lumes are ava i lable , the followi ng criteria may be use d. For pretimed sig nal or a background-cycle-co ntrolled act u ated signal , a left turn volume of more than two vehicles per approach per cycle for a peak hour; or for a traffic- actuated signal, 50 or more left turning vehicles per hour in one direction with the product of the turning and conflicting through traffic during the peak hou r of 100,000 or more. (Ta ble 3) NOT MET 4. Misce ll aneous. Other factors that might be cons id ered in clude but ar e not lim ited to: impa ired sig ht distance due to horizontal or vertic a l curva ture, or where there are a large percentage of buses and trucks. Table 3: Left Turn Volume and Conflicti ng Through Volume -Hourly (Heaviest Peak) TIME Northbound Southbound NBLT SB Thru Product SB LT NB Thru Pr oduct 7:45am to 8:45am 116 633 73 ,428 23 1144 26,312 14:4 5 to 15:45 57 74 1 4 2,237 44 474 20,856 16:00 to 17:00 52 1098 57,096 47 616 28 ,952 As seen in t he above t ab le t he left tu rn movements did not exceed the threshold f or acciden t s nor volume so protect ed left turn phasing is no t recommended at this intersection. The east -west d irections had less left turn traffic a nd through movements so were also determined to not exceed thresholds. A level of service analysis was also cond ucted at the intersection of Temple City Boulevard at Lemon Ave nu e. The intersection under exis ting conditions and existing geometric condition s will ope rate at LOS B duri ng AM peak hours, LOS B during Afte r noo n peak and LOS A during evening peak ho urs with average delay to ve hicl es at accept ab le level s. Pedestrian Counts : Pedestrian co unts were also taken at each intersect ion to determine how ma ny pedestrians use these crosswalks at the intersec tion s of (1) Lemon Avenue at Temp le City Boulevard and (2) Lemon Avenu e at Trelawney Avenue. The pedestrians counts were conducted as follows: Table 4 : Pedestrian Count Information Count Date Count Time Count Locations Thursday, 4. AM Cou nt : 6:45AM-8 :45AM (2 hour cou nt) 3. Lemon Avenue and Temple Ap ril 5, 2018 5. AF T Count: 1:45PM-3:30PM {1.5 ho ur cou nt) City Bo ul eva rd 4. Lemon Avenue and 6. PM Count : 4:00PM-5:30PM {1.5 hour co unt) Trelawney Avenue CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Pre pared By : T r an st ech Engineers, In c. I Pa ge 12 of 34 TEM PLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON A VENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CI TY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWN EY AVENUE Table 5: Pedestrian Count Information for Temple City Boulevard and Lemon Avenue Date Counts Collected: Thurs day, April 5, 2018 North-South Street: Temple City Bouleva rd East-West Street: Lemon Avenue North Leg South Leg East Leg TIME Adult School Total Adult School Total Adult School Total Adult Age Age Peds Age Age Peds Age Age Peds Age 6 :45am-7 :15am 0 32 32 1 2 3 2 11 13 0 30min 7:15AM-7:45AM 0 20 20 0 3 3 0 2 2 3 30min 7:45AM-8:15AM 3 71 74 0 27 27 4 22 26 4 30min 8 :15AM-8:45AM 1 8 9 0 0 0 1 3 4 1 30min 1 :45PM -2:15PM 2 11 13 0 3 1 1 30 min 3 1 2 2 :15PM -2:45PM 3 2 5 0 3 0min 5 5 0 0 0 5 2 :45PM-3 :15PM 0 77 77 0 30 33 0 30min 30 1 34 3:15PM-3 :30PM 0 5 5 0 3 3 ' 1 2 3 0 15 min 4:00PM -4:30PM 0 6 6 2 3 5 2 3 5 1 30min 4:30PM-5:00PM 3 3 6 0 3 3 1 0 1 3 30min 5:00PM-5 :30PM 1 2 3 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 30min SUBTOTAL 13 237 250 3 81 84 13 78 91 18 PEDESTRIANS TOTAL 612 PEDESTRIANS West Leg School Age 5 10 4 1 2 2 4 80 10 8 6 1 169 ~----------------------------------------~------~-----C_IT_Y_O_F~T_E_M_P_L_E _C~IT_Y ~~~ Prepa r ed By: Transtech Eng in eers, Inc. I Page 13 of 34 Total Peds 5 13 45 3 3 9 80 10 9 9 1 187 TEMPL E CITY HIGH SC HOO L TRAFFIC ANALYS IS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTION S OF LEMON A VEN UE AT (1) TEMPLE CIT Y BOULEVARD A ND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVEN UE Table 6: Pedestrian Count Information for Trelawney Avenue and Temple City Boulevard Date Counts Collected: Thursday, Apri l 5, 20 18 North-South Street : Tre law ne y Avenue East-West Street: Lem on Ave nu e Ea st Leg South Leg TIME Adult Schoo l Total Adult School Age Age Ped s Age Ag e 6:45AM -7 :15AM 2 129 131 0 57 3D min 7:15AM-7 :45AM 1 48 49 2 21 3D m in 7 :45AM -8:15AM 2 203 205 0 94 3D min 8:15AM-8:45AM 2 5 7 2 2 3D min 1:45PM -2 :15PM 1 32 33 2 30 3D m in 2:15PM -2:45PM 2 2 4 2 6 3D min 2:45PM -3:1 5PM 0 124 124 0 177 3D min 3 :15PM-3:30PM 0 15 15 0 22 15 min 4 :00PM -4:30PM 0 2 2 0 3 3D min 4:30PM-5:00PM 2 4 6 1 9 3D min 5:00PM -5 :30PM 0 1 1 0 2 3D min SUB TOTAL PEDESTRIANS 12 565 577 9 423 TOTAL PEDESTRIANS 1,009 Total Pe ds 57 23 94 4 32 8 177 22 3 10 2 432 As show n in the a bove co unts, t he n umber of pedest ria ns usin g t he cros swalk nea r the hig h sc hool is sig nif icant d u ri ng AM a nd A FT peak periods w hic h co i ncide w ith th e sc hool bell sc hedu le. As seen in the Tr elawney Ave nu e and Lem o n Aven ue Pedes tri an co un t s 300 pe destri an s used t he ma r ked cros sw alks at sc hoo l let o ut all w it h in a 30 m in pe ri o d. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Pre pa r ed By : Tran stech Engi neer s, In c. I Page 14 o f 34 TEMPLE CITY HIG H SCHOOL TRA FFIC ANALYSIS FOCU SE D AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CI TY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Bicycle Count: A s part of th e project the n umber of bi cy cles crossing t he in t e rsec t ion of Temp le City Boul eva r d and Lemo n Aven ue were reco rd ed. As obse rved all bicycles crossing this intersectio n use d the cros swa l k and we re high schoo l age st ud e nts. Th e majority of bicycles continued t o the high schoo l by riding o n the sidewa lk. This co uld be due to the fa ct that during pe ak school hou r s there were a sign ifica nt a mou nt of cars weavi ng to t he curb to pick up/drop o ff stud en t s along Lemon Avenue. Table 7: Bicycle Count in 30 Minute Increments Time by 30 Min North leg South leg East leg West leg 06 :45-07 :15 0 1 2 0 07 :15-07:45 0 0 0 0 07:45-08:15 3 0 4 3 08:15-08 :45 1 0 1 0 13:45-14:15 4 0 0 1 14:15-14:45 3 1 0 0 14:45-15:15 2 3 3 7 15:15-15 :30 1 0 1 2 16:00-1 6:30 1 1 2 2 16:30 -17:00 0 1 2 2 17:00-17:30 0 0 0 0 Total Bikes 15 7 15 17 Radar Speed Survey: To d et e rm i ne actual spee ds a lo ng Lemon Avenue, a radar speed survey was conduct ed on Lem o n Ave nu e between Oak Aven ue and Tre law ney Ave nue on Thursda y, March 15, 2018 over a 24-ho ur period. The radar meas urem ents fo ll owed guide lin es and procedures outlined in the CVC Sectio ns 627, 21400, 22358 and the CA MUTCD 2B.13 . Table 8 below shows th e 2018 spe ed su rvey results: Table 8: Radar Speed Survey for lemon Ave between Oak Ave and Trelawney Ave Dir. of Date/Time of 85%ile 50 %ile 15%ile Posted location Travel Survey Speed Speed Speed limit MPH lemon Avenue : Oak Ave to 3/15/18 1 lfrelawney Ave EB/WB 32 26 26 30 24-HR As shown in Tab le 8, the speed sa mples taken o n March 15, 2018 show that the 85th percentile speed of ve hi cles is at 32 MPH. The 85 1h pe rce nt ile i nd icates t hat 85% of the vehicles sample d were t raveling at 32 mph or lower. The 85 1h% is slightly hig her than the pos t ed speed l imit of 30 MPH or 25 MPH when ch ild re n are prese nt in a sc hoo l ar ea. Currently, there is a 30 mph posted sp eed l im it sign for eas t bound trave lers entering Lemon Ave nu e from Oak Aven ue and t wo 25 mph sc hool speed lim it signs f o r eas t bo u nd and CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By: Tra n stech Enginee rs, In c. I Page 15 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE westbound travelers. The survey sa mple showed that during bell periods th e 10 mph pace of vehicles was between 20 mph to 29 mph with speeds sl ightly in c r eas ing after kids were not on the st r eet. Accident Data: As part of the engineering review process a search of all accidents that may have occ urred along Lemon Avenue was undertaken . Accident data was obtained from the comput erized accident records system maintained by the State of California Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) between the years of June 2012 to 2018 available data. The following enlists the number of accidents that occurred at Lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard, Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue and mid block accidents along Lemon Avenue between Temple City Boulevard and Oak Avenue. Lemon Ave and Trelawne)l Ave Lemon Ave and Tem~le Cit)£ Blvd Midblock on lemon Ave • 2018 -0 accidents • 2018 -1 accident • 2018 -0 accidents • 2017 -1 accident • 2017 -2 accidents • 2017-1 accident • 2016-0 accidents • 2016-4 acci d en ts • 2016 -1 accident • 2015 -0 accidents • 2015 -2 accidents • 2015 -0 accidents • 2014-0 accidents • 2014-4 accidents • 2014-0 accidents • 2013-0 accidents • 2013 -1 accident • 2013-1 accident • 2012-0 accidents • 2012-4 acc idents • 2012-0 accidents According to the SWITRS accident data, there has been a total of 1 reported acciden t at the intersection of Lemon Avenue. and Trelawn ey Avenue, 18 accide nts at the intersection of Lemon Avenue and Temple City Bou levard, and a total of 3 reported accidents that occurred midblock on Lemon Avenue between Temple City Bou levard and Oak Avenue. Please refer to Table 9: Accident Summary for detailed list of the accident history. No location Dist. Factor Trelawney Ave and lemon Ave EB THRU VEH HIT LEMON AVE AT 21' E 8/28/2017 AUTO/PED INJ (1) NB PED IN XWA LK 1 8:02 TRELAWNEY AVE (R-0 -W PED) SB LTVEH STRUCK TEMPLE CITY NB BICYCLIST (40 1 BLVD AT LEMON 0 02/03/2018 06:20 AUTO/BIK E INJ YEARS OLD -VEH AVE I MPAIRED) TEMPLE CITY WB LTVEH HIT SB 2 BLVD AT LEMON 0 10/6/2017 15:22 BROADSIDE PDQ THRU VE H AVE (R -0-W AUTO) CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepar ed By: Tran ste ch Engin ee rs, In c. I Pa ge 16 of 34 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENU E AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD A ND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE TEMPLE CITY WB THRU VEH HIT BLVD AT LEMON 0 11/28/201 7 10:00 AUTO/PED INJ (1) SB PED IN XWAL K AVE (R -0-W PED) NB LT VEH HITSB TEMPLE CITY THRU VEH AND EB BLVD AT LEMON 0 1/15/2016 7 :55 BROADSIDE PDO STPED VEH AVE (R -0 -W AUTO) TEMPLE CITY SB THRU VEH HIT BLVD AT LEMON 0 1/9/2016 23 :10 REAR END INJ (1) SB STPED VEH AVE (UNSAFE SPEED) TEMPLE CITY NB LTVEH HITSB BLVD AT LEMON 0 5/5/2016 8:30 BROADSIDE INJ (2) THRU V EH AVE (R-0-W AUTO) TEMPLE CITY WB THRU VEH HIT BLVD AT LEMON 0 7/3 1/2016 11:10 BROADSIDE INJ (2) SB THRU VEH AVE (STOP SGN I SIG) SB THRU VEH LEMON AVE AT (IMPAIRED) HIT SB TEMPLE CITY 0 6/23/2015 11:30 REAR END PDO STPED VEH BLVD (UNSAFE SPEED) SB THRU VEH HIT TEMPLE CITY NB LTVEH AND NB BLVD AT LEMON 0 5/8/2015 16 :30 BROADSIDE PDO STPEDV EH AVE (R -0 -W AUTO) LEMON AVE AT SB RTV EH HITWB TEMPLE CITY 0 1 2/5/2014 9:0 2 BROADS IDE PDO THRU VEH BLVD (UNKNOWN) NB LT BI CY HIT BY TEMPLE CITY 6/7/2014 AUTO/BIKE INJ (1) SB THRU VEH BLVD AT LEMON 9' s 13 :5 3 (BICY MAKING AVE 1M PROP TURN) TEMPLE CITY NB THRU VEH HIT BLVD AT LEMON 0 8/30/2014 23:32 BROADS I DE INJ (1) EB LTVEH AVE (STOP SGN I SIG) TEMPLE CITY NB THRU VEH HIT BLVD AT LEMON 0 12/16/2014 16:24 REAR END INJ (1) NB THRU VEH AVE (TOO CLO SE) TEMPLE CITY SB PASSING VEH BLVD AT LEMON 26's 5/22 /20 13 15:14 AUTO/BIKE INJ (1) HIT SB THRU BICY AVE (IMPROP PASS) TEMPLE CITY SB LTV EH HIT EB BLVD AT LEMON 9' s 10/23 /2012 9 :44 AUTO/PED INJ (1) PED IN XWALK AVE (R-0-W PED) CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Pre p ared By: Transtec h Engineers, Inc. I Page 17 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTION S OF LEMON A V ENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE TEMPLE CITY NB LTVEH HITSB 16 BLV D AT LEMON 0 1 2/10/2012 15:30 BROADSIDE INJ (2) THRU V EH AVE (R-0-W AUTO) TEMPLE CITY 17 BLVD AT LEMON 0 12/19/2012 8:30 HIT OBJ PDQ EB RT VEH HIT OBJ AVE (1M PROP TURN) TEMPLE CITY WB TH RU VEH H IT 18 BLVD AT LEMON 0 12/31/20 12 7:10 BROADSIDE INJ (1) NB THRU VE H AVE (STOP SG N I SIG) Midbl ock on Lemon Ave LEMON AVE AT WB STPED VEH HIT 380' WB THRU BICY AND 1 TEM PLE CITY 4/6/2017 7:50 SIDESWIPE PDO w WB STPED VE H BLVD (OTH ER HAZ) LEM ON AVE AT 114' NB BCKING VEH HIT 2 TEMPLE CITY 5/27/2016 8:20 BROADS I DE PD Q EB THRU VE H w BLVD (R -0 -W AU TO) LEMON AVE AT WB VE H ENT TRAFF 100' 3 TEMPLE CITY 12/20/20 13 7:45 SIDESWIPE PDQ HIT WB THRU VE H w BLVD (S TRTN G I BCKNG) Criteria for Determining If Stop Control Is Warranted: In order to th orough ly assess potential measures that the intersection of Le mon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue cou ld benefit from , an analysis of all-way stop insta ll ation was conducted. A t Lemo n Ave nu e and Tre lawney Avenue only the south leg is st op co ntrolled, while the east leg is un co ntrolled . Traffic con t ro l devices work i n con cert w ith t he basic "ru les of the road" co ntaine d in traffi c laws and ordinan ces. Th e Cali f o rn ia Manu al of Uniform Traffic Devices (CAMUTCD) Sec tion 2B.07 describes appli cations, warrants, a nd pl aceme nt of STOP signs (R1-1). T he STO P sig n is a regu latory d evice th at is used when traffic is r eq uired to stop. STOP signs are use d to assign rig ht-of-way at an in tersection. Multi-way co nt r o l is use d w here the v olume of traffic on the intersecting r oads is approx im ately equal. Stop s igns are not use d as a speed control d evice a nd shou ld be used only where warranted . The placement of these signs is di ct ated by e ngin ee rin g judg ment and base d on gu id elin es found in the CAMUTCD and CVC. The City's follows the crite ria f o r d et e rmining if two-way o r all-w ay stop cont r o l is warranted as set by the CA MUTCD. These f act o rs include minimum vo lu me on each of the street approach es, acci d ent in vestigation, speed of traffic, number of pedest rians and potentia l sight obst ru ctions. A ll-Way Stop I nstallation : Th e following briefly o utlines th e Criteri a f or the in stallation of A ll-Way stop warr ants. ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL WARRANT FOR I NSTALLATI ON CA M UTCD SECTI ON 28.07 Th e placement of A ll-Way stop control is warranted when : CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Pr epared By : Transt ech Eng in eers, Inc. I Page 18 o f 34 TEMP LE CITY HIG H SCHOOL TRAFF IC AN ALYSIS FOCUSE D A T TH E INTERSEC TI ONS OF LEMON AVEN UE A T (1) TEMP LE CITY BOULE VA RD AND AT (2) TRE LAWNEY AVENUE A. Traffic co ntro l sig nals are j us tif ied NOT MET B. A crash prob lem exists as i nd i cate d by 5 o r more accidents i n a 1 2-month period NOT MET C. M in imum Vo lu mes are met if: 1. Vo lume entering in te rsect io n f ro m t he maj o r app roac h (total of both approaches) averages 300 ve h icles per hou r f o r any 8 ho urs of an average day. NOT MET And 2. The comb in ed ve hi cle, pedes tri an and b icycle vo lum es en t er i ng t h e i ntersectio n f rom the m i no r street approac hes averages at leas t 200 un its per hou r for the same 8 hours . NOT MET 3. If t he 85 1h percenti le approach speed of t he major-street exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vo lumes are 70 perce nt of the above va lues. NOT MET Othe r cri teri a that may be con side r ed in a n e ngi nee ri ng st udy in clu de: A. Th e nee d t o co ntrol lef t-tu rn co nflict s B. Th e need t o co nt r o l vehicle/ped es tria n co nf li ct s nea r locatio ns that ge nera t e h igh pedestrian vo l um es C. Locations where a road user, after st opping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate t he i nter sect ion un less co nf lict ing cross traffic is also r equired to stop D. An i nte rsect io n o f two r es ide ntial n eig hb o rh oo d co ll ector (t h ro ugh) streets of si m i la r design and o perati ng ch ar ac t eri stics w here multi-way st op co ntro l wou ld improve traff ic operatio nal characteri st ics ofthe intersect ion. The traf fic and pedest ri an vo l ume indicates t he in tersection does not meet or exceed minimum t h res ho lds for mo re t ha n 2 hou rs for t he i nstallat ion of all -way stop control so all -way stop control is not recommended at t hi s loca t io n. Table 10: Peak Hour Approach Counts (8 Hours) Met M et Ea st Bound Pedestri ans Minimum M i nimum and West Threshold of Highest crossing Threshold of Bound Approach on lemon 300 V ehicles at least 200 Traffic on Trelawney Ave nue TOTAL Time lemon Ave per hour for Ave nue during t he Cars + uni ts per any 8 hours hour for the Both (Northbound) same peak Peds of an sam e 8 Approaches Minor St traffic hours average day hours (Major (both (East leg) (h ighest. Street) approaches) approach)? 7:00-8 :00 542 YES 30 180 210 YES 8:00-9 :00 389 YES 30 212 24 2 YES 9:00-10 :00 91 NO 59 7 66 NO 13:00-14:00 91 NO 15 33 48 NO 14:00-15:00 272 NO 21 128 149 NO 15:00-16:00 290 NO 15 17 32 NO 16:00-17:00 222 NO 14 6 20 NO 17:00-18:00 20 5 NO 15 1 16 NO CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By: Transt ec h Eng ineers, Inc. J Page 19 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIG H SCHOOL TRAF FI C ANALYS IS FOC USED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMP LE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE line of Sight at'Jnt ersections : Th e A me r ica n Assoc iatio n o f St at e Highway and Tr ansportatio n Officia ls (AAS HTO) "A Po li cy o n Geo metric Des ig n of Highways and Stree t s" and ot he r engin eering resou r ces has set up guide l ines a nd st and ar ds f or es timat ing l ine of sig ht at inte rsec t ions. Improving Sight Lines at Crosswalks and Cro ssing Ve hicles: At pedes t r ian cross ings and at side street cr oss in gs, ge ne ro us sight dist ances and un obstru cte d sig ht lines all ow mot orist s and pedes t r ians to detect eac h othe r in time to avo id colli sio ns. Sight lin es sh o uld be des ig ned so th at the mot o ri st can observe t h e move men t o f a pe des tri an o r a cross ing mot orist for a long e no ug h pe ri od oftime to accu rate ly det ermine th e appr oac hing ve hicl es or pedes trians speed. If t he moto ri st has on ly a brief gli mpse of a wa iting pedest r ian o r car t hey ca nno t observe th ei r speed, and he o r she may overestimate the speed and not sufficient ly slow h is o r her approach t o t he crosswa lk or no t an ticipate a crossi ng vehicle i n t i me to stop. A veh icle's driver nee ds t o be a ble t o have room t o stop bef ore col lidi ng w ith something i n the roadway, suc h as a pe d es tria n in a crosswal k, a st opped ve hicle o r road d eb r is. To allow drive rs to perceive, reac t , an d safe ly st op, a mini m um st o pp ing sight dist ance m ust be avai lable. Stopping sig ht distance is def i ned as t he su m oftwo dista nces (AASH TO, Green Book): 1. Reaction dis ta nce-the dist ance t rave led by the ve hi cle from t he i nsta nt the driver sees an obj ec t necess it ating a sto p t o t he inst ant the brakes are ap pli ed; p lus 2. Braking dis t ance-th e di st ance trave led by the vehi cle fro m th e in st ant br ake app li cat ion beg i ns t o t h e in sta nt w he n th e ve hicl e has co me t o compl et e sto p . The reaction dist a nce is based o n the reac t ion tim e of th e driver a nd t he speed of the veh icle. Th e braki ng d ista nce is d epe nde nt up o n th e veh icle speed a nd t he coeffic ient of friction between the tires and r oadway. AAS HTO (AAS HTO Tab le 3-1 St opping Sight Dista nce on Leve l Roadways) lists minimum recommended stopping sight dis t ances based on des ign speed and the sum of reaction distance and b raki ng dis t a nce . At 25 m ph, for examp l e, 91.9 feet is needed for reaction distance and 60 feet is needed f or braki ng dist ance . Whe n t hese num bers are ad de d, a nd rounded, the t otal dista nce is rounded to 155 feet. The st oppi ng sigh t dist a nce n ee d ed is 155 feet f or a st reet with a posted speed of 25 mph. Table 11: Stopping Sight Di stance Design Brake reaction Braking distance on Stopping Sight Distance Speed distance level Calculated Design (mph) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 15 55.1 21.6 76 .7 80 20 73.5 38.4 111.9 115 Note: Brake reactio n d ista nce p redicated o n a ti me of 2.5 s; dece leration rate 11.2 Ob s t ructions within Sight Triangle s: At t he decision poi nt , t he driver's eye height is used for meas u rement. Any obj ect w it hin t h e sight t ri angle t hat wou ld o bst ru ct t he driver 's v iew of an ap p roac hi ng ve hi cle o r a pedestrian wa iting o n a cu r b t o cross sh ou ld be removed or mod if ied or a ppropriat e traffic I lOCAl I IIAU1' I AIIU TOIIC\IAOOf . I lit I YeW OIIJIUIC1'10N "lJ lfJ 1001 or lltOUlOCR - --\ ... ~~ 7.;---= ,-;;;-;, ;,;;;,.,- .~ \ ----,, -80D aoo ......--,,, 1 eTATE HIO tiWAY co ntro l dev ices sho u ld be insta lled as pe r th e Ca li fo rni a Figure 21 : Exa mple of Sto p ping Sight Dis ta nce Triangle ~---------------------------------------------------------C_I_TY __ O_F_T_EM __ P_LE_C_I_TY_ Prepa r ed By: Transtech Engi neers, Inc. I Page 20 of 34 • TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Obstructions within sight triangles could be buildings, vehicles, hedges, trees, bushes, tall crops, walls, fences, etc. the above figure shows a sight triangle and the clear view triangle. The intersection of Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue is stop controlled in the south leg only. Figure 22: Stopping Sight Distance Triangle for Vehicles Turning onto Lemon Avenue from Trelawney Avenue. Red Curb Recommendations: For the south side of Lemon Avenue, approximately 30' red on west side to driveway apron and approximately 20' west of driveway+ curb return, and approximately 70' red on east side up to existing driveway. As well as 20' on the either side of Trelawney Avenue south of the crosswalk. Figure 23: Stopping Sight Distance Triangle for Pedestrians Crossing at the crosswalk in the EL. Red Curb Recommendations: For the north side approximately 52' of red curb west of crosswalk, and approximate ly 70' of red curb east of crosswalk. The same red curb recommendations apply for the south side due to the vehicle stopping sight distance as shown in Figure 22 above. ~----------------~ CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 21 of 34 • TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAF FIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED A T THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CIT Y BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNE Y AVENUE Figure 24 : Stopping Sight Distance Triangle for Pedestrians Crossing at the West Leg Crosswalk, based on the Scenario of the Existing East Leg Crosswalk being Removed and Relocated to the West Leg. Red Curb Recommendation: For the north sid e approximately 70' of red curb west of crosswalk to the 151 p arkin g lot driveway, and approximately 76' of red curb east of crosswalk connecting to the existing red curb . The same red curb r eco mmend ations apply for the south side due to the vehicle sto p pi ng sig ht distance as shown in Figure 22 above . Please refer to the following pages for recommendations and diagrams based on the analysis conducted. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By: Transtech Eng i neer s, Inc. I Page 22 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TR AFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVEN UE AT (1) TEM PLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS Th e in st allat ion of all traffic co ntrol d ev ices o n public st ree t s are guided by the California Manua l of Uniform Traffic Co ntrol De vices (CAMUTCD), the Ca liforni a Ve hi cle Code (CVC), and o n an eng in ee r ing study/judgement. Improvements at Lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard 1. Install "stay back lines" I "yi eld lin es" approaching all crosswa lks in each leg. This w ill encourage vehicles to stop behind cro ssw alk lin es. 2. Install pedes trian push buttons for pedestrians cross in g north and south, make sure push bu tto n style matches the other existing pu sh buttons for east/west cross ing. 3. In st all upd ate d push button sig nag e at all pu sh buttons so that pe destrians know when to cross. See image showing R10-3 i to be installed at eac h push b utton. 4. In cre ase the time for pede st ri a ns to cross Templ e City Blvd with pe destri ans crossing a few seconds before ve hicl es are given a green. CAMUTCD Section 4E.06 El SIARI CR OSSIWG IIAI!I ftr Ytl rclll 'IIW ' oon SJAII ;.~ liahl Crtllilt , • ...,. ' II Sttrtt4 • JIM£ REWAIN IN' h rinill C11ui I OOM'J CROSS PUSH BUTTOH TO CROSS "At intersections with high pedestrian volumes and high conflicting turning vehicle volumes, a brief leading pedestrian interval, du ring which an advance WA LKING PERSON indication is displayed for the crosswalk while red indications continue to be displayed to parallel through and/or turning traffic, may be used to reduce conflicts between pedestrians and turning vehicles." Also "At intersections with pedestrian volumes so high tha t drivers have difficulty finding an opportunity to turn across th e crosswalk, the duration of the green interval for a concurrent vehicular movement can be intentionally set to extend beyond the pedestrian clearance time to provide drivers additional green time to turn while the don't walk symbol is displayed." CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By: Trans t ech Engineers, Inc. I Page 23 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Improvements at Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue 1. Outline the existing yellow ladder crosswa lks in the so uth le g and th e east leg with highly refl ective yellow raised pavement markers (RPM). 2. In sta ll shark teeth yield lines 30-feet in advance of the crosswalk for westbound a nd eastbound travelers. 3. Install corresponding "YIELD HERE FOR PEDS" sign s (Rl-5 ) adjacent to the proposed yield lines for eastbound and westbound travelers. 4. In sta ll Double Sided Pedestrian Activated Flashing Beacons on top of existing Pedestrian crossing signs to draw attention to the crosswalk location. 5. Purchase (2) new YIELD to pedestrian in -road signs to be placed at each crosswalk by sc hool staff during school hours to me et CAMUTCD guide lines for California. (R1-6b) California law uses Yield to pedestrian signs. * The legend STATE LAW is optional. A fluorescent yellow -green background color may be used instead of yellow for this sign. VI HERE ... ~I\ Rl·5 STATE * ~ v TO WiiiiiN CROSSWALK RI-O Crosswalk Option 1: Leave the existing crosswalk in the east leg and install improvements for increased line of sight. These improvements would includ e the following: a) Installation of additional red curb along Lemon Avenue as shown in Figure 26 based on AASHTO's Stopping Sight Distance Desi gn Speed of 25 mph. For the north side approximately 52' of re d cu rb sho uld be installed west ofthe crosswa lk, and app roximately 70' of red curb shou ld be in stalled east of the crosswalk. The same red curb recommendation s apply for the south side as shown in Figure 22 due to th e vehicle stopping sight distance. The red curb recommendations take into account the l ine of sight needed for veh icles turning out of Trelawney Avenue onto Lemon Avenue as well as for pedestrians waiting to cross Lemon Aven ue. b) Con struct a larger landi ng pad for pedestrians to wait to cross by expanding the curb return with a mini bulb out or larger paved waiting area. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By : Tra nst ech Enginee rs, Inc. I Page 24 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFF IC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1} TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2} TRELA WNEY AVENUE Crosswalk Option 2: Remove the ex ist ing east leg crosswa lk and in st all a new cr osswalk in the west leg to better accommoda t e the large number of stud ents using the crosswalk coming f r om the wes t side o f Tr elawney Ave nu e. There is a larger landing pad area f o r wa iti ng pedes t ria ns as we ll as sidewalks leading up t o the ramp. Thi s option wo uld also reduce the number of veh icle movements cross in g over the crosswa lk . The following improveme nts would have to be implemented for this option: a) Full removal of the existing east leg crosswa lk (sand blast) so it is no lo nger v isible. b) Removal of all pedestrian sign age/posts at th e crossi ng, and re co nst r uction the existin g curb ramp on the north side of Lemon Avenue conve rtin g it to r egu lar curb so there is no r ema inin g crossing indication in the eas t leg. c) Installation o f a new ye llow ladd er st r iped crosswa lk in the west leg. This would include cons truction of a new ADA com pli ant curb ram p w ith truncated domes on the north side of Lemon Avenue. There is already an ex isting curb ramp on the south side. The pos t and signage from the removed crosswalk can be utilized f or t he new loca tion. d) In stallatio n of add itiona l red curb a long Lemon Ave nu e as shown in Figure 27 based on AAS HTO's Stopping Sig ht Distance Design Speed of 25 mph. For the north side approximat ely 70' of red curb shou ld be in sta ll e d west 'of the new west l eg crosswa lk to the 151 park i ng l ot driveway, and app rox im ate ly 76' of re d curb shou ld be in sta ll ed east of the new we st leg cr osswalk co nnecting t o the exist in g red curb. The sa m e red curb recommendations apply for the south si de as shown in Figure 22 du e to th e vehicle stopping sight distance. The re d curb re co mm enda ti o ns take into acco unt the lin e of sight needed for ve hicl es turning out of Trelaw ney Ave nu e onto Lemon Avenue as we ll as for pedestrians wa iting to cross Lemon Avenue. Figure 27: Proposed Diagram for Lemon Avenue and Trel awney Avenue (Removal of Exis ting East Leg Crosswalk, Installation of New West Leg Crosswalk) CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By : Tra nstech Engineer s, Inc. I Pa ge 25 of 34 TE MPLE CIT Y HIGH SC HOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTION S OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWN EY AVENUE ATIACHMENTS Attachment 1: Turning Movement Count for Lemon Avenue at Temple City Boulevard Attachment 2: Turning Movement Count for Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue Attachment 3: Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Counts for Trelawney Avenue Attachment 4: 24 Hour Radar Speed Survey on Lemon Avenue Attachment 5 : Turning Movement Count for Lemon Avenue at Temple City Boulevard (Right and Left Turns on Red) Attachment 6 : LOS Calculations for AM Peak Attachment 7: LOS Calculations for Afternoon Peak Attachment 8: LOS Calculations for PM Peak CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 26 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFF IC ANA LYS IS FOCUSED A T THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVEN UE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELA WNEY AVENUE Attachment 1: Turning Movement Count for lemon Avenue at Temple City Boulevard TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT PROJECT NAU.E: Adult Peds -hand c:ounl Dicyclat ·hand count PROJECT NO: DATE: TIME 06:45-07:00 07:00-07:15 07:15-07:30 07:30-07:45 07:0-01:00 01:00-01:15 01:15-01:30 01:30-011;.45 14:00·14:15 14:15•'14:30 14:45·15:00 11!1:00·15:15 15:15·15:30 15:30·15:45 115:00-16:15 18:15-111:30 18:45·17:00 t7:QQ.f7:1S 17:15·17:30 17:30·17:45 1 7:415-18:00 10020 ThurtApriU 2011 N..S STREET: TEMPLE CITY OLYO E·WSTREET: _,L"'!MO""'N'-----------PED COUNT 12 1t 10 .. 2 1& ts u e School ag• •dnlrtlnt NORTHBOUND SOUTH OO U~lD N-8 EASTBOUND W ESTDOUtm LE FT THRU RIOUT LEFT Tl<RU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT TIIRU RIGHT TOTAL Nl SL EL 21 204 .. 284 " • • 12 "2 51 2t5 •• 25 404 ts 2l .. ., 12 153 30 10 32 2U 105 0 385 .. . 35 . " " 21 219 100 <1< 13 " 00 49 211 t7 150 21 510 10 11 •• 10 u n '" .. " 43 Jt4 19 200 54 142 ,. 21 .. 21 Jl 21 11 4 •• " 20 JS2 I .., u 21 .. tl 110 4 207 2 131 351 " . .. .. 131 13 301 •• 120 111 .. ••• 10 .. 10 10 " 20 "' 177 " ... .. 35 ... " "' " ... " " " .. 171 " ••• 1< ... " 10 10 16 •• 10 11 ... 10 .. 105 " " 10 53 .. " 1 .. 10 "' " <1 5 " 13 1 .. " 280 • •• " •• 120 " U1 " " " ,. 13 ... 10 •• 20 111 " ... ,. 537 10 " u •• ... " ... 10 "' 10 " " 10 10 ... " ... " .. PEAK-HOUR VOLUME ANALYSIS 35 u "' " ,. •• ,. .. " CALC4\A!EQ PEAK HQVR YOlUMES:AM El ET ER •• SR NL uo 311 ST NT 921 23 Sl NR WR wr Yll CALCtn.An;p PEAK HOUR YOLUMES.tlOOtt EL ET ER 153 63g 29 SR ST Sl NL •• 13:45-14:45 NT • •• NR .. WR wr Wl CAlCUlAJED PeAK HQUR VOlUMES£¥ El ET ER ss 1098 47 SR Ill . , ST 115~00-17:00 NT 616 SL NR " WR IVT Yll .. " 16 31 37 .. ,. " 10 50 ,. 1 .. 30 10 •• " 15 " AOJUS!ED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-AM El ET ER tOO Ul 2l SR ST Sl NL t~T NR IUS 1144 44 WR wr 1'11. ADJUSTED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-NOON EL ET ER 85 741 .... SR ST Sl Nl " 14:45·15:30 NT .,. NR .. ADJUSTED PEAK HOUR VOLUYES.fM EL ET ER 14 490 24 SR NL .. ST 17:00·17:30 NT 310 SL NR " IVR wr Wl WR WT WL .. 103 •• •• •• " 13 • " Wl .. •• .. 10 ~T adult •11• pe dultilns NL SL EL Wl D IKE COUNT ~ Dikes . I NL SL EL Wl ~~----------------------------------------------~-----C_IT_Y_O_F7T_E_M_P_L_E_C~IT_Y Prepared By: Trans tech Engi neer s, Inc. I Page 27 of 34 • TEMPLE CITY H I GH SCHOOL T RAFFI C ANALYSIS FO CU SED A T THE I NTER SE CTIONS OF LEMON AVENU E AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVAR D AND AT (2) TRELAW N EY AVENUE Attachment 2 : Turning Movem e nt Count for l emon Avenue at Trelawney Ave nu e TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT PROJECT NAME: Ttmplt Ci!y l tftly Ru!tw Adult Peds· h•rtd counl Blcyclt s • htnd count PROJECT NO: DATE: TIME OS:AS-07:00 07:00..07:15 07:15-07::10 07:30.07:<15 07:45-08:00 01:00-01:15 01:15-01:30 01:30-GI:AS 13:4 5·14:00 14:00·14:15 14:1 5-14:30 14:30·14:45 14:4 5·15:00 t &:00-16:15 15:15-16:30 15:30-tS:AS tlk 00-16:15 1&:1 5·16:30 11:30·16:45 11:AS.17:00 11:00-11:16 11:16-11:30 17:30·17: .. 5 17: .. 5-11:00 11020 ThurtAP'II 2011 PED ~QUtf! School ag• ptdnttlant N: 2 STREE:: 1 .JJTR!!JE .. LAOJW!!fN!!;EL! ,---,----,-E·WSTREET: LEMON .. .. " NORTH BOUND SOUTH BOUND N ..S S 0 UNO WEST NO E·W • • lEFT THRU RIGHT lEFT THAU RIGHT TOTAL lEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL NL SL EL " •• ., .. " .. •• 22 •• "' 53 "' .. " 12 .. .. •• .. • " . , • " " " .. 20 '" "' . , .. ., .. 101 202 .. "' .. •• .. • " .. .. 20 12 24 .. ,. •• " " .. .. .. ., 2 " •• .. .. .. •• 101 " ., " 31 70 22 .. 110 ••• ... •• •• .. " 22 " " .. ., •• •• " .. .. ,. .. 70 J2 " " " •o .. PEAK-HOUR VOLUME ANALYSIS CALCUL.AI£Q PEAK HOUR VOlUMES-AM AOJUSI EQ P~K HOUR VOLUMES-AM ----- SR ST SL SR ST SL EL WR EL WR ... ET 0 1: .. 547: .. 5 Ytr "' '" ET 7 .41~.4$ W1 ,., 40 ER YIL .. " ER WL NL NT NR NL NT NR • •• • • CALCULAJEQ PEAK HOUR VOLU MES-NOON AOJUS!EO PEAK HOUR VOLUMES-NOON ---- SR ST SL SR ST SL EL WR EL WR ,. ET 13:45-14:"5 YIT ... ... ET 14.45·11.30 WT "' 22 ER WL " .. ER WL " NL "' NR NL NT NR ,. •• C ALCUWEQ PEAK HQUR yoLUMES.PJ.I ADJUSTED P£AK HOUR VOLUMES-PM 0 0 0 ------ SR ST SL SR ST SL 0 EL WR EL WR •• ET 11:00-17:00 YIT "' .. ET t7.00·U.30 WT ., " ER W L •• ER WL HL NT NR NL NT NR ' " • " PEOCOUNT~ Adult pede sltlanal I DIKE COUNT~ Olkel : I WL tiL SL EL WL ut. SL WL CITY OF TEMPLE CIT Y Prepared By : Transtech Engineers, In c. I Page 28 of 34 TEMPLE CI TY HI GH SC HOOL TRAFF IC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT TH E INTER SECT IONS OF LEMO N AVENUE AT (1) TEM P LE CITY BOULEVARD AN D AT (2) TR ELAWNEY AVENUE Attachment 3 : Average Daily Traffic (ADT ) Counts for Trelawney Avenue Da y: Thurs day Date: 3/15/2018 Prepared byNOS/ATD V O LU ME Trel awney Ave S/0 Lemon Ave City: Temple City Project II: CA18_5181_00 1 DAILYTOTALS ~ AM Per iod NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL 00:00 0 0 0 12:00 1 2 3 00:15 0 0 0 12:1 5 2 0 2 00:30 0 0 0 12:30 3 6 9 00:45 1 1 0 1 1 12:45 3 9 2 10 5 19 0 1 :00 0 0 0 13:00 4 4 8 0 1 :15 0 0 0 13:15 3 1 4 0 1 :30 0 0 0 13:30 1 2 3 0 1 :45 0 0 0 13:45 7 1 5 2 9 9 24 02:00 0 0 0 14:00 7 12 19 02 :15 0 0 0 14:15 4 5 9 02:30 0 0 0 14:30 4 4 8 02:45 0 0 0 14:45 6 21 3 24 9 45 03:00 0 0 0 15:00 9 24 33 03:15 0 0 0 15:15 3 7 10 03:30 1 0 1 15:30 2 8 10 03 :45 0 1 0 0 1 1 5:45 1 1 5 2 41 3 56 04 :00 1 0 1 16:00 4 2 6 04:15 0 0 0 16:15 3 5 8 04:30 0 0 0 16:30 6 3 9 04:45 0 1 0 0 1 16:45 1 14 3 13 4 27 05:00 1 0 1 17:00 5 6 11 05:15 0 0 0 17:15 3 5 8 05:30 0 0 0 17:30 5 3 8 05:45 1 2 0 1 2 1 7:45 2 1 5 7 21 9 36 06:00 4 1 5 18:00 3 4 7 06:15 3 0 3 18:15 1 6 7 06:30 0 1 1 18:30 2 2 4 06:45 1 8 0 2 1 10 18:45 3 9 1 13 4 22 07:00 6 2 8 19:00 2 3 5 07:15 3 3 6 19:15 2 0 2 07 :30 11 7 18 19:30 2 3 5 07:45 10 30 2 14 1 2 44 19:45 1 7 0 6 1 13 08:00 3 4 7 20 :00 3 2 5 08:15 3 8 11 20:15 0 0 0 08:30 7 4 11 20:30 0 0 0 08:45 17 30 22 38 39 68 20:45 1 4 0 2 1 6 09:00 14 26 40 21:00 0 2 2 09:15 6 5 11 21:15 1 1 2 09:30 23 34 57 21:30 1 0 1 09:45 16 59 28 93 44 152 21:45 0 2 2 5 2 7 10:00 2 3 5 22:00 0 1 1 10:15 4 2 6 22:15 0 2 2 10:30 1 2 3 22 :30 0 1 1 10:45 2 9 4 11 6 20 22:45 0 0 4 0 4 11:00 1 2 3 23:00 1 3 4 11:15 2 1 3 23:15 0 0 0 11:30 1 1 2 23:30 1 0 1 11:45 1 5 1 5 2 10 23:45 0 2 0 3 0 5 TOTALS 146 163 309 TOTALS 113 151 264 SPLI T % 47.2% 52.8% 53.9% SPLIT % 42.8% 57.2% 46.1% DAILY TOTALS ~ AM Peak Hour 08:45 09:00 09:00 PM Peak Hour 14:15 14:45 14:45 AM Pk Vo lume 60 93 152 PM PkVolume 23 42 62 Pk Hr Fact or 0.652 0.684 0.667 Pk Hr Factor 0.639 0.438 0.470 7·9Volume 60 52 11 2 4·6Volume 29 34 63 7 • 9 Peak Hour 07:00 08:00 08:00 4 • 6 Peak Hour 16:15 17:00 17:00 7 • 9 Pk Volume 30 38 68 4 • 6 Pk Volume 15 21 36 Pk Hr Factor 0.682 0.432 ,, ,,, 0.436 Pk Hr Factor 0.625 0.750 II. ,, 0.818 ~ CITY OF TEMP LE CITY ~-------- • Prepared By: Tra nstech Eng i neers, Inc. I Page 29 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2} TRELAWNEY AVENUE Attachment 4: 24 Hour Radar Speed Survey on Lemon Avenue Diy; Th ursday Di te: 3/15/2018 03y: Th ursday Oitt : 3/15/20 18 summary :!..II.'_ l L .. .,.;l ;q .~ 00:00 AM 0 0 01:00 0 0 02:00 1-1 0 03:00 0 0 0<1:00 r ~ 0 0 05:00 1--0 0 06:00 1- 1 4 -01:Cl0 ,_ 9 ~5 08:00 8 ~4 -09:00 ~ 5 2 10:00 2 4 11:00 0 5 12:00 PM 3 I 13:00 2 7 14:00 14 39 15:00 15 ·17 16:00 2 16 -17:00 ~ 3 9 18:00 4 9 -19:00 -2 7 20:00 2 6 21:00 ~ ~' 1 2 22:00 0 3 -23:00 2 0 I r -rc--•. l!J ""~ I ~ "of fotah AMYolumtl H 100 liAM IM IX AM NRIIOIII 0 100 0 /00 Volume 9 4} PMVolumtt s.; ,,, "'M ~~ ~~ PM Peak floUt ISW uoo Vokl"" I} ., Dlrtttlont l Peak Pttlods All Spu ds .'!!1 )~.H 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I l 0 14 22 255 18 7 141 138 12 3 5 7 25 16 's 33 51 22 29 96 97 88 92 45 103 38 sa 54 110 23 3l 28 56 9 20 I 8 l l r ··~ , .. - )IX 446 .,, ISII ISK 0100 0700 JSS lt1 040 611 IlK JIM 14 00 1100 !16 110 AM7-9 Voll.lme 931 -· SPEED l emon Ave W/0 Tr elawney Ave SPEED lemon Av e W/0 Trcl awn cy Ave 1 ~•.;._ )\.~ .! i)::..:!; l[f:;f!. !Wl_ -:: -... _l 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l 1 0 0 0 0 10 3 1 0 0 0 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 47 10 1 0 0 0 ~ 3 0 0 0 0 14 I I 0 0 0 IS 2 2 0 0 0 31 5 0 0 0 0 21 9 I 0 0 0 25 1 0 0 0 0 43 s 0 0 0 0 so 5 1 0 0 0 51 16 0 0 0 0 70 12 2 I 0 0 28 6 0 0 0 0 24 6 2 I 0 0 14 2 2 0 0 0 11 I 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 ~~~."· .......... l ~..:;.:.:.;f< =· 1'-·= "" U1l J X "' 0~ 170 l4 5 0 0 0 .,. IK CM ouo ClUIO 11'00 ,, 10 2 111 61 II 2 0 0 1111 JM CM OK 111.00 1100 noo 1&00 70 16 l I NOON 12·1 PM4·6 % Yol~oWM " Vofumr: 3 1W. 215 ·-7?' 427 ·-· !·~1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 14W. Cit y: Temple City Project II: CJ\1 8_5181_002 City: Temple City Project R: CAI 8_5181_0 02 IC':1 ~ :D:j 0 0 6 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 . 0 55 0 0 542 0 0 389 0 0 91 0 0 54 0 0 6S 0 0 U4 0 0 91 0 0 272 0 0 190 0 0 122 0 0 205 0 0 162 0 0 9 7 0 0 125 0 0 50 0 0 27 0 0 11 --'"'iOQ;j 0 0 1111 ••w OJOO S4 l 0 ( 1716 S9~ 15-00 IPO Off Pe.k Volum e s y ........ " 14 14 • • 47% ~. -----------~--~-CIT Y OF TE MP LE CITY Prepared By : Transtech Eng i neers, Inc. I Page 30 of 34 • TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOl TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECT IONS OF lEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOUL EVARD AND AT {2) TRELAWNE Y AVENU E Attachment 5: Turning Movement Counts for Right and Left Turns on Red at Lemon Avenue at Temple Cit y Boul evard Turning Movomont Count TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT rropnro d by: G.E. Tro fQo Su rvoy s PROJECT NAME· T I Cll S I l R I eme o ~ ··~ I \1 8 W Ad It I' d h d u a •· on coun PROJECT NO: 180 20 LTOV -Loft lum on Yellow Dloyolos · hnnd c ount DAlE: Thun Aerll51 20te RTOR -Right Turn on Rod .. All Directions LTOR ·Loft Turn on Rod NO only N.S STREET: lEMPLECilY BLVD E·W STREET: LEMON llond ·Avo QU EUE WAITING (lolly a) 12 11 10 4 3 2 18 15 14 8 7 8 TIM E NORTit DOUND SOUntOOUNO N·S EIISTOOUND WESTOOUNO E·W LTOR LTOY RTOR LTOR LTOY RTOR TOTAL LTOR LTOY RTOR LTOR LTOY RTOR TOTAL NDL NOR SOR EDR WBR 06:45.07:00 3 1 4 10 1 8 17 07:00.07:15 2 10 2 1 3 18 8 2 10 07:15-07:30 3 1 4 1 11 12 0 7:30-07:45 1 1 2 1 7 7 15 07:45.08:00 s 7 a 1 14 I 1 v I 12 08:00.08:15 4 I 5 I 11 I 4 15 20 08:15·08:30 I 2 3 18 2 20 08:30.08 :45 1 1 I 5 5 11 13:45-14 :00 I 1 I 4 2 7 14:00.14 :15 I I I 3 2 15 I I 1 20 14 :15·14 :30 I 2 3 s 3 14:31).14:45 1 3 3 7 I 1 7 8 17 14:45-1 5:00 I 8 I 1 1 10 D I 1 I 12 15:00·15:15 2 2 4 I 7 I 5 14 15:15·15:30 I I 3 1 8 7 3 10 15:30·15:45 0 0 16:00.16:15 I I I s 1 6 3 10 18:15-18:30 0 4 4 0 16:31).16:45 2 I 3 5 2 7 16:45-17:00 s I I I I 7 7 7 17:00-17:15 I I 2 12 12 17:15-17:30 1 I 2 5 6 17:30·17:45 0 0 17:45-10:00 0 0 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY • Prepa r e d By: Tr an stech Enginee r s, Inc. I Page 31 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Attachment 6: LOS Calcu lations for AM Peak MITIG9 -Existing AM Peak Thu May 3, 2018 10:31:24 Page 1-1 ------------------------------------------------~~-~~---------------------------Temple City School Circulation Assessment Existing Conditions AM Peak Level Of Sorvico Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Al ternative) •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Intersection ~1 Temple City Blvd/Lemon Ave ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec) : Loss Time (sec) : Optimal Cycle : 100 10 37 Critical Vol./Cap .(X): Average Delay (sec/veh): Level Of Service: Street Name: Temple City Blvd Lemon Ave 0.510 13 .2 B Approach: North Bound South Sound East Bound West Bound Movement: L -T -R L - T -R L T - R L -T - R ------------1---------------l l---------------ll---------------ll---------------l Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Y+R: 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 ------------l---------------ll---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Volume Module:AM Peak Base Vol: 116 1144 44 23 633 100 50 75 148 46 103 96 Growth Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Initial Bse: 116 1144 44 23 633 100 50 75 148 46 103 96 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial FUt: 116 1144 44 23 633 100 50 75 148 46 103 86 User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHf Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1,00 1.00 PHF Volume: 116 1144 44 23 633 100 50 75 148 46 103 96 ~educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 116 1144 44 23 633 100 50 75 148 46 103 86 PCE Adj: 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 Fina1Vo1ume: 116 1144 44 23 633 100 50 75 148 46 103 96 ------------l---------------ll---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1900 1800 1900 1800 1800 1900 1800 1800 1800 Adjustment: 0 .33 0.97 1.10 0.19 0.92 1.08 0.49 0.77 0 .73 0 .51 0.91 0.93 Lane$: 1 .00 1 .93 0.07 1.00 1.76 0.24 0 .51 0.49 1.00 0.41 0.59 1.00 Final Sat.: 589 3379 130 343 2934 463 454 680 1317 392 855 1496 ------------1---------------ll ---------------l l---------------l l ---------------l Capacity Ana l ysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.20 0 .34 0.34 0.07 0.22 0.22 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.06 Crit Moves: •••• •••• Green/Cycle: 0.66 0 .66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0 .24 Volume/Cap: 0.30 0 .51 0.51 0.10 0.32 0.32 0.47 0 .47 0.48 0.51 0.51 0.24 Delay/Veh: 7.5 8 .7 9.7 6.2 7,3 7.3 34.1 34.1 34.0 34.7 34.7 31.3 user OelAdj: 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 AdjOel/Veh: 7.5 8.7 8,7 6,2 7 .3 7.3 34.1 34.1 34.0 34 .7 34.7 31 .3 LOS by Move: A A A A A A C C C C C C HCM2kAvgQ: 2 9 10 0 5 5 3 4 4 4 5 2 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Traffix 9.0.0715 (c) 2008 cowling Assoc. Licensed to TRANSTECH, WALNUT, CA CIT Y OF TE M PLE CIT Y Prepared By: T r an st ech Engineers, In c. I Page 32 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTI ONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Attachment 7: LOS Calculations for Afternoon Peak • MITIGO -Existing AFT Peak Thu May 3, 2018 10:45:29 Temple City School Circulation Assessment Existing Conditions AFT Peak Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 IICH Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Page 1-1 ..•...••...•.......... ~ ........................................................ . Intersection 11 Temple City Blvd/Lemon Ave •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Cycle (sec): Loss Time (sec): Optimal Cycle: 100 10 30 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): Average Delay {sec/veh): Level Of Service: 0.356 11.2 B Street Name: Temple City Blvd Lemon Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T R L -T -R ------------1---------------ll---------------l l---------------l 1---------------1 Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include ~lin. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ~.0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 ------------1---------------1 1---------------ll---------------ll ---------------l Volume Module:aft peak Base Vol: 57 474 22 44 741 66 39 60 99 21 44 24 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 57 474 22 44 741 66 39 60 99 21 44 24 Added Vol: 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 PaaserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 57 474 22 44 741 66 39 60 99 21 44 24 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 57 474 22 44 741 66 39 60 99 21 44 24 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 57 474 22 44 741 66 39 60 99 21 44 24 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 57 474 22 44 741 66 39 60 99 21 44 24 ------------l---------------ll ---------------1 1---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1800 1800 1000 1800 1800 1800 1900 1900 1800 1800 1000 1800 Adjustment: 0.30 0.97 1.10 0.44 0.93 1.09 0.52 0.81 0.79 0.54 0.84 o.e s Lanes: 1.00 1.92 0.00 1.00 1.06 0.14 0 .50 0.50 1.00 0.43 0.57 1.00 Final sat.: 543 3352 156 703 3120 278 472 726 1427 416 871 1530 ------------l---------------ll---------------l l---------------1 1---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.06 0.24 0.24 0 .00 0.00 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.02 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.67 0.67 Volume/Cap: 0.16 0.21 Delay/Veh: 6.4 6.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 6.4 6.5 LOS by Move: A A HCM2kAvgQ: 1 3 0.67 0.21 6.5 1.00 6.5 A 3 0.67 0.09 5.9 1.00 5.9 A 1 •••• 0.67 0.36 1.3 1.00 7.3 A 5 0.67 0.36 7.3 1.00 7.3 A 6 0.23 0.23 0.36 0.36 32.9 32.9 1.00 1.00 32.9 32.9 c 2 c 3 0.23 0.30 32.2 1.00 32.2 c 3 0.23 0.23 0.22 0 .22 31.4 31.4 1.00 1.00 31.4 31.4 c c 1 2 0.23 0.07 30.0 1.00 30.0 c 1 ···········································································*··--· Traffix 0.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling ~soc. Licen3ed to TRANSTECR, WALNUT, CA CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By: T ra nst ec h Engineer s, Inc . I Page 33 o f 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Attachment 8: LOS Calculations for PM Peak MITIG8 -Existing PH Peak Thu May 3, 2018 11:03:21 Temple City School Circulation Assessment Existing Conditions PH Peak Level Of Service Computation Report Page 1-l 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Intersection 11 Temple City Blvd/Lemon Ave Cycle (sec): Loss Time (sec): Optimal Cycle: 100 10 33 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): Average Delay (sec/veh): Level Of Servi ce : 0.435 6.8 A ·~······································••******************••·················· Street Name: Temple City Blvd Lemon Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound Ea st Bound West Bound Movement: L -T -R L -T -R t. -T R L -'J: R ------------1---------------ll---------------l 1---------------11---------------1 Control : Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green : 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 .0 4.0 4 .0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 ------------1---------------ll---------------ll ---------------ll---------------l Volume Modu1e :PM Peak Base Vol: 52 616 21 47 1098 55 26 34 57 10 27 29 Growth Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 52 616 21 47 1098 55 26 34 57 10 27 29 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 52 616 21 47 1098 55 26 34 57 10 27 29 User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 PHF Volume: 52 616 21 47 1098 55 26 34 57 10 27 29 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 52 616 21 47 1098 55 26 34 57 10 27 29 PCE Adj: 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 FinalVolume: 52 616 21 47 1098 55 26 34 57 10 27 29 ------------l---------------ll ---------------1 1---------------11 ---------------1 Saturation Flow t-todule: Sat/Lane: 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1900 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 Adjustment: 0.22 0.97 1.10 0.38 0.94 1 .10 0.51 0 .80 0.79 0.55 0 .96 0.85 Lanes: 1 .00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.92 0.08 0.54 0.46 1 .00 0.37 0.63 1.00 Final Sat .: 400 3394 116 688 3236 162 502 657 1427 364 994 1530 ------------1---------------ll---------------ll ---------------ll---------------l Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0 .18 0.19 0.07 0.34 0.34 0.05 0 .05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0 .02 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: Volume/Cap: Delay/Voh : User DelAdj: AdjDel/Veh: LOS by Move: HC~l2kAvqQ: 0.78 0.78 0 .17 0 .23 3.0 3.0 l.OO 1.00 3 ,0 A 1 3.0 A 3 0.79 0.23 3.0 1.00 3 .0 A 3 •••• 0.78 0.78 0.09 0.43 2 .6 3.7 1. 00 1.00 2.6 3.7 A A 0 6 0 .79 0 .43 3.7 1.00 3.7 A 7 •••• 0.12 0.12 0 .43 0.43 43.1 43.1 1.00 1.00 43.1 43.1 D D 2 3 0.12 0.34 41.6 1.00 41.6 D 2 0.12 0.12 0.23 0 .23 40 .6 40.6 1.00 1.00 40 .6 40.6 D D 1 1 0.12 0.16 40.0 1.00 40.0 0 1 ········-··*·····················~·············································· Traffix 9.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to TRANSTECH, WALNUT, CA ~~--------------------------------------~------~-----C_IT~Y_O_F~T_E_M~P_L~E ~C~IT~Y ~~~ Prepared By: Transtec h Engin ee rs, In c. I Page 34 of 34 ATTACHMENT C MANAGEMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: November 6, 2018 TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Bryan Cook, City Manager By: Bryan Ariizumi, Public Safety Supervisor SUBJECT: TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL FOCUSED TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND LEMON AVENUE AND TRELAWNEY AVENUE AND LEMON AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: The City Council is requested to: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 18-5361 ·(Attachment "A"), approving the traffic and pedestrian safety measures recommended by the Transportation and Public Safety Commission; and 2 . Approve a budget amendment in the amount of $36,000 to implement the approved traffic and pedestrian safety measures. BACKGROUND: 1. On December 8, 2017, during the "Lights on Temple City Event", the Youth Committee conducted a pedestrian safety survey to obtain feedback from the community on what locations the city should focus on for traffic improvements affecting all modes of transportation (i.e., walking, cycling, and driving). 2. On December 14, 2017, the Youth Committee hosted a "Quality of Life Pop -Up Event" to resume discussing concerns residents expressed at the Lights of Temple City Event. · 3. On January 24, 2018, the Youth Committee provided a presentation to the Transportation and Public Safety Commission regarding pedestrian and traffic safety that focused on traffic issues at the intersections of Lemon Aven ue at Temple City Boulevard and Lemon Avenue at Trelawn ey Ave nue . The Commission directed staff to worl< with the City's contract traffic engineer (Transtech) and the Youth Committee to discuss the concerns and options for the two intersection s and return to the Commission with recommended improv emen ts . City Council November 6, 2018 Page 2 of 5 4. On February 22, 2018, Transtech hosted a workshop for the Youth Committee and discussed traffic engineering report preparation and thresholds for implementatiqn as found in the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) or the California Vehicle Code (CVC). The Youth Committee introduced some proposed traffic and pedestrian safety measures and discussed the requirements and potential effects of the proposed improvements. Following the discussion City staff directed Transtech to conduct a traffic analysis of existing conditions and potential traffic improvements around Temple City High School. 5. On March 15, 2018, Transtech conducted a 24-hour traffic volume count on Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue and a 24-hour radar speed survey on Lemon Avenue. 6. On April 5, 2018, Transtech and Youth Committee members conducted pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular turning movement counts at the intersections of Lemon Avenue at Temple City Boulevard and Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue. 7. On May 4, 2018, Transtech prepared a report (Attachment "B") presenting the results and recommendations of their traffic engineering analysis. 8. On June 13, 2018, at its regularly scheduled meeting, the Transportation and Public Safety Commission reviewed the focused traffic engineering analysis prepared by Transtech and recommend that it be brought before the City Council for review and approval. ANALYSIS: As part of the traffic engineering analysis, traffic speeds, field review, accident history, and pedestrian, bicyclist and vehicular traffic volumes were used to assess exiting conditions on Lemon Avenue, Trelawney Avenue and Temple City Boulevard. Transtech's report provides details about the data collected, their findings and their recommendations. The following is a brief summary of the report that was reviewed by the Transportation and Public Safety Commission on June 13, 2018: • Lemon Avenue is considered a local roadway with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. It is approximately 38' (feet) in width with one lane in each direction separated by a dashed yellow center line. • Temple City Boulevard is considered a primary roadway with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. It is approximately 64' (feet) in width with two lanes in each direction with left turn pockets. • Trelawney Avenue is considered local residential roadway with a prima facie speed limit of 25 mph. It is approximately 38' (feet) in width with one lane in each direction separated by a dashed yellow center line. City Council November 6, 2018 Page 3 of 5 • The intersection of Temple City Boulevard and Lemon Avenue is signalized with yellow ladder crosswalks in all legs. The intersection of Trelawney Avenue and Lemon Avenue is stop controlled in the south leg with yellow ladder crosswalks in the south and east legs. • A radar speed survey showed that traffic travelling along Lemon Avenue were driving at/or around the posted speed limit of 30 mph. This indicates that 85% of the vehicles sampled were travelling at 32 mph or lower. • Accident Data showed that between 2012 and 2018, there was one recorded accident at Lemon Avenue and Trelawney, 18 accidents at Lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard, and three reported accidents that occurred mid-block on Lemon Avenue between Temple City Boulevard and Oak Avenue. • Installation of protected left turn phasing for all directions at Lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard and All-Way stop control at Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue did not meet warrants for installation. Based on the findings of the traffic engineering analysis, Transtech recommends that the following traffic control measures be implemented which are guided by the California Manual Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD): Lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard (page 23 of Attachment "B") • Install "stay back lines" I "yield lines" approaching ail crosswalks; • Install pedestrian push buttons for pedestrians crossing north and south, matching the style of the existing east/west crossing push buttons; • Install updated push button signage at ail push buttons; and • Increase time for pedestrians to cross at Temple City Boulevard with pedestrians crossing a few seconds before vehicles are given a green. Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue (pages 24 & 25 of Attachment "B") Transtech is presenting two options for traffic and pedestrian safety improvements at the intersection of Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue. • Option 1: Leave the existing crosswalk in the east leg and install improvements for increased line of sight. These improvements include the following: o Outline the existing yellow ladder crosswalk in the south leg and the east leg with highly reflective yellow raised pavement markers (RPM); o Install shark teeth yield lines 30-feet in advance of the crosswalk for westbound and eastbound travelers; o Install corresponding "YIELD HERE FOR PEDS" signs (R1-5) adjacent to proposed yield lines for westbound and eastbound travelers; o Install a "stay back line" I "yield line" approaching the south leg crosswalk; o Install Double Sided Pedestrian Activated Flashing Beacons on top of existing Pedestrian crossing signs; o Purchase two new YIELD to pedestrian in-road signs (R1-6b) to be placed at each crosswalk by school staff during school hours; City Council November 6, 2018 Page 4 of 5 o Install approximately 52' of red curb west of the crosswalk and 70' of red curb east of the crosswalk on the north side and south sides of Lemon Avenue; o Install 20' of red curb from the base of the curb ramp on the east and west sides of Trelawney Avenue; and o Construct a larger landing pad for pedestrians to wait to cross by expanding the curb return with a mini bulb out or larger paved waiting area. • Option 2: Remove the existing east leg crosswalk and install a new crosswalk in the west leg to better accommodate the large number of students using the crosswalk corning from the west side of Trelawney Avenue. There is a larger landing pad area and sidewalks leading up to the ramp. This option will also reduce the number of vehicle movements crossing over the crosswalk, thereby reducing the conflict with pedestrians in the crosswalk. The following improvements would have to be implemented for this option: o Full removal of the existing east leg crosswalk (sand blast); o Removal of all pedestrian signage/posts; o Reconstruction of the existing east leg curb ramp on the north side of Lemon Avenue to a regular curb; o Install a new yellow ladder stripped crosswalk in the west leg; o Construct a new ADA compliant curb ramp with truncated domes on the north side of Lemon Avenue; o Install pedestrian signage removed from the east leg crosswalk; o Install Double Sided Pedestrian Activated Flashing Beacons on top of Pedestrian crossing signs; o Outline the existing yellow ladder crosswalk in the south leg and the new yellow ladder crosswalk in the west leg with highly reflective yellow raised pavement markers (RPM); o Install shark teeth yield lines 30-feet in advance of the crosswalk for westbound and eastbound travelers; o Install corresponding "YIELD HERE FOR PEDS" signs (R1-5) adjacent to proposed yield lines for westbound and eastbound travelers; o Install a "stay back line" I "yield line" approaching the south leg crosswalk; o Purchase two new YIELD to pedestrian in-road signs (R1-6b) to be placed at each crosswalk by school staff during school hours; o Install approximately 70' of red curb west of the new west leg crosswalk and 76' of red curb east of the new west leg crosswalk on the north side and south sides of Lemon Avenue; and o Install 20' of red curb from the base of the curb ramp on the east and west sides of Trelawney Avenue. The Transportation and Public Safety Commission considered the proposed traffic and pedestrian safety improvements at the two intersections and, by a 3-2 vote, selected Option 1 for the intersection of Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue. Per Section 2- 6E-7 of the Temple City Municipal Code, the Transportation and Public Safety City Council November 6, 2018 Page 5 of 5 Commission "shall receive and investigate citizen complaints pertaining to vehicular traffic and pedestrian safety concerns, and when deemed necessary by the commission, report the commission's findings and recommendations to the City Council." The Commission is recommending that the City Council approve the recommended measures, which are described in a report prepared by Transtech. The Temple City Unified School District (TCUSD) and Temple City High School (TCHS) administration reviewed the proposed traffic and pedestrian safety improvements at the two intersections and have no objections or recommendations. They also stated that they would prefer implementation of Option 2 for the intersection of Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue. CITY STRATEGIC GOALS: Implementation of the traffic and pedestrian safety measures around Temple City High School furthers the City's Strategic Goal of Public Health and Safety. FISCAL IMPACT: Transtech estimates the cost for improvements for Lemon Avenue at 1) Temple City Boulevard and at 2) Trelawney Avenue (Option 1) is about $36,000.' The estimated cost for improvements for Lemon Avenue at 1) Temple City Boulevard and at 2) Trelawney Avenue (Option 2) is about $44,000. If the City Council approves Option 1, a budget amendment in the amount of $36,000 will be necessary as funds have not been appropriated in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-19 City Budget. If Option 2 is selected, a public hearing will need to be scheduled for the removal of the east leg crosswalk at Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue. During the public hearing, City Council can approve the proposed traffic and pedestrian safety improvements, along with a budget amendment. ATTACHMENTS: A. Resolution No. Hi-5361 B. Transtech Report dated May 4, 2018 ATTACHMENT A RESOLUTION NO. 18-5361 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPROVING THE TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY MEASURES AT LEMON AVENUE AND TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND LEMON AVENUE AND TRELAWNEY AVENUE WHEREAS, The City Council recognizes residents and business owners In the City may be Impacted by excess motor vehicle traffic and parl<lng congestion; WHEREAS, Division 11, Chapter 9, Section 22507, subsection "A" of the California Vehicle Code authorizes local authorities to prohibit or restrict the stopping, parking, or standing of vehicles on certain streets or portions thereof, during all or certain hours of the day; WHEREAS, the proposed traffic and pedestrian safety measures are consistent with all local, state and federal regulations. WHEREAS, the traffic and pedestrian safety Improvements will help ensure the safety of motorists and pedestrians around Temple City High School. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Public Safety Supervisor Is hereby authorized to remove, erect or Install the following signage or other appropriate markings at the Intersections of Lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard and Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue: Lemon Avenue and Temple Cltv Boulevard a) Install "stay back lines" I "yield line" approaching all crosswalks In each leg; b) Install pedestrian push buttons for pedestrians crossing north and south, making sure to match the existing style of the existing push buttons for the east/west crosswalks; c) Install updated push button signage at all push buttons; and d) Increase the time for pedestrians to cross Temple City Boulevard with pedestrians crossing a few seconds before vehicles are given a green light. Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue a) Outline the existing yellow ladder crosswalk In the south leg and the east leg with highly reflective yellow raised pavement markers (RPM); b) Install shark teeth yield lines 30-feet in advance of the crosswalk for westbound and eastbound travelers; c) Install corresponding "YIELD HERE FOR PEDS" signs (R1-5) adjacent to proposed yield lines for westbound and eastbound travelers; d) Install a "stay back line" I "yield line" approaching the south leg crosswalk; e) Install Double Sided Pedestrian Activated Flashing Beacons on top of existing Pedestrian crossing signs; f) Purchase two new YIELD to pedestrian In-road signs (R1-6b) to be placed at each crosswalk by school staff during school hours; g) Install approximately 52' of red curb west of the crosswalk and 70' of red curb east of the crosswalk on the north side and south sides of Lemon Avenue; h) Install 20' of red curb from the base of the curb ramp on the east and west sides of Trelawney Avenue; and I) Construct a larger landing pad for pedestrians to wait to cross by expanding the curb return with· a mini bulb out or larger paved waiting area. Resolution No. 18-5361 Page2 SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on this 6111 day of November 2018 William Man, Mayor ATTEST: Peggy Kuo, City Clerk I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution, Resolution No. 18-5361, was duly passed, a~proved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Temple City at a regular meeting held on the 61 day of November 2018, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Councilmember- Councilmember- Councilmember- Councllmember- Peggy Kuo, City Clerk TO: FROM: DATE: TRANSTECh City of Temple City Transportation & Public Safety Commission Temple City Youth Committee Transtech Engineers, Inc. May4,2018 ATTACHMENT 8 SUBJECT: TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL FOCUSED TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT {1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT {2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE INTRODUCTION On behalf of the City of Temple City, and at the request of the Temple City Youth Committee and direction from the Temple City Transportation and Public Safety Commission, Transtech Engineers, Inc. has completed a traffic analysis and circulation study around Temple City High School focusing on the intersections of {1) Lemon Avenue at Temple City Boulevard and (2) Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue. This study evaluates and recommends various traffic measures to Improve overall vehicular and pedestrian safety based on field observations, data collection, California Manual Of Uniform Traffic Control Devices {CAMUTCD) guidelines, and the California Vehicle Code {CVC). Please r efer to Figure 1: VIcinity Map of Study Area below. Figure 1: Vicinity Map of Subject Intersections LEGEND r.\ Lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard \!1 • Signalized Intersectio n Marked crosswalks In all legs Crosswalks are yellow ladd er striped Lemon Avenue Is a loca l roadway Temple City Boulevard Is classified as a Primary road l emo n Av enue Posted Speed limi t: 30 mph with 25 mph school zone Temple City Boulevard Posted Speed Limit: 35 mph with 25 mph school zone 0 Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue Stop controlled In the sou th leg (Sl) Marked crosswalks In south leg (SL) and east leg(EL) Crosswalks are yellow ladder striped Trelawney Ave Is a re side ntial roadway Trelawney Ave Prima Facie Speed Limit: 25 mph · D Temple City High School D City of Temple City Border CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Pr epa red ~y: Trans t ec h Engineers, Inc . I Page 1 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TnAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT ________ ('-'1),_T_EM_I'_L_E C_IT-'Y_DOULEVARD AND AT (2} TRELAWNEY AVENUE BACI<GROUND On behalf of the City of Temple City, Transtech Engineers, Inc. (Traffic Engineering Consultant Staff) has collaborated with the Temple City Youth Committee as well as the Transportation and Public Safety Commission to promote Pedestrian, Cyclist, and Driver Safety at various City events, commission meetings, and worl<shops. This Included brochure handouts with safety information for the different roadway users (Pedestrians, Cyclists, and Drivers), surveys distributed to the community to identify traffic concerns around the City, and a traffic engineering workshop focused on various aspects of traffic engineering when evaluating an area for improvements. The following Is a summary list of the various events that were hosted collaboratively between Temple City Youth Committee, Temple City Transportation and Public Safety Commission, and Transtech Engineers, Inc. focused on Pedestrian, Cyclist, and Driver Safety: lights on Temple City Event (December 8, 2017) On Friday, December 8, 2017, the City held their annual tree lighting event known as "Lights on Temple City" at Temple City Park on las Tunas Drive. The Temple City Youth Committee hosted a booth that focused on pedestrian safety and Included surveys for the community to fill out related to the types of traffic Improvements they would like to see around the City, their frequency of using different modes of transportation (walking, cycling, driving), and other traffic related questions. Transtech staff also attended and assisted by passing out Pedestrians, Cyclists, and Drivers Safety brochures to the community. Quality of Life Pop-Up Event (December 14, 2017) On Thursday, December 14, 2017, the Temple City Youth Committee hosted a Quality of Life Pop-Up event at the Temple City Library. Transtech staff, School District Staff, Sherriff, and others participated in an open discussion panel about the meaning of traffic safety, personal experiences with traffic and potential Improvements that could be made In the City. All participants expressed what types of improvements they would like to see around the City and the Temple City High School area. Some of the topics discussed included cell phone use while walking, cyclists not being aware of the road rules, traffic signal walt times, and speeding. Temple City Transportation and Public Safety Commission Meeting (January 24, 2018) To continue the theme and based on community feedback from the two prior events of Pedestrian, Cyclist, and Driver Safety, two presentations were given at the Transportation and Public Safety Commiss ion Meeting. The first was given by Transtech staff relating to the various rules and roles official traffic control plays on roads from a Pedestrian, Cyclist, and Driver standpoint which included safety tips. The second presentation was given by the Temple City Youth Committee based on feedback they received from the community. The presentation focused around Temple City High School, specifically at the intersections of (1) lemon Avenue at Temple City Boulevard and (2) Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue. At that time the Transportation and Public Safety Commission Meeting directed traffic engineering staff to meet separately with the Youth Committee to go over the preferred study area. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By: Trans tech Engineers, Inc. I Page 2 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANAlYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECT IONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY OOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENU E Temple City Youth Committee Workshop (February 22 , 2018) At the direction of City Staff and Temple City Transportation and Publi c Sa f ety Commission, Transtech staff hosted a workshop with the Temple City Youth Committee going over the specific traffic concerns that they brought up at prior events regarding the area around Temple City High School. The workshop highlighted what goes Into preparing a traffic engineering repo rt and the various items that recommendations are based on such as existing conditions, traffic counts, field observations, accident history, etc. The workshop wa s also an open discussion and reviewed the possible options/projects addressing the concerns the youth committee had around Templ e City High School. The goal of the workshop was to narrow th e possible improvements that (1) the City would financially be able to undertake and (2) potentially meet thresholds for implementation as found in the CAMUTCD or eve, and (3) improve the overall safety of the main intersection around the schoo l. Some of th e measures introduced by the Youth Committee were; a raised crosswa lk at Trelawney Avenue, street narrowing on Temple City Blvd, signa l improvements to protect pedestrians at the Temple City Boulevard and Lemon Avenue intersection as well as parking changes around the area to improve visibility of pedestrians on Lemon Avenue. From there the City directed engineering consulting staff to conduct a traffic analysis of existing conditions and potential traffic Improvements. Traffic Count Collection (April 5, 2018) Due to weather constraints and scheduling around spring break, pedestrian and vehicular traffic counts and field observations were collected Thursday, April 5, 2018. Students part of the Temple City Youth Committee also participated in the counts. The counts were taken at the following times and locations : Count Times: 1. AM Count: 6:45AM-8:45AM (2 hour count) 2 . AFT Count: 1:45PM-3:30PM (1.5 hour count) 3. PM Count: 4:00PM-5:30PM (1 .5 hour count) Count locations: 1. Lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard 2. Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue ANALYSIS Existing Conditions Assessment: The City directed Traffic Engineering Consu lting staff to conduct an assessment of exist ing conditions and come up with recommendations that would alleviate traffic congestion and Improve pedestrian safety during the peak AM drop-off, AFT pick-up times, and PM commute times around Temple City High School focusing on th e following two Intersect ions: 1. Lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard 2. Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue Communities often tailor a combination of strategi es including engineering, enforcement, education, and encouragement to address specific needs of each schoo l as well as other stakeholders. In order to come m_ CITYOFTEMPLECITY iili -------------------------------Pr-ep-a-re-d~B-y:-T-ra-n-st-ec~h-E-ng-ln-e-er-s,~ln-c-.~I -P-ag-e-3-o~f --34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TllAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTEilSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT {1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND 1\T {2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE up with the most appropriate and suitable solution It Is Important to Identify the root cause of the Issue. The. development of a successful school circulation program requires community support and input as well as the support of school district representatives and decision makers to ensure that all stakeholders are represented. While school traffic during peak drop-off and pick-up times Is unavoidable, there are mitigation measures that can be implemented to ease the traffic congestion .and Improve the safety and circulation of the area. It Is also Important to educate community members of the type of mitigation measures that are appropriate and why other improvements may not be successful for this particular scenario. Streets serve multiple users and mod es of transportation including passeng e r cars, pedestrians, bicycles, buses, and Emergency Service vehicles. As a result, measures used to affect the way vehicles operate on a street may also affect other users. Potential impacts to other modes of travel needs to be considered to minimize or prevent unintended consequences. Please refer to the Figure 2 below for a detailed existing conditions diagram. LEGEND (!)Lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard • Signa lized Intersection • Marked crosswalks In all legs • Crosswalks are yellow ladder striped • Lemon Avenue Is a local roadway • Temple City Boulevard Is classified as a Primary road • Lemon Avenue Posted Speed Limit: 3 0 mph • Temple City Boulevard Posted Speed Limit: 35 mph Q Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue A • Stop controlled In the south l eg (SL) t;' • Marked crosswalks In south leg (51.) and east leg (EL) • Crosswalks are yellow ladder striped • Trelawney Ave Is a residential roadway • Trelawney Ave Prima Facie Speed Limit: 25 mph Lemon Ave between Oak Ave and Temple City Blvd: Posted speed limit signs: • 30 mph (For EB travel only) • 25 mph sc hool sign (Both directions) Pa vement legends: • "SLOW SCHOOL XING" legends (Both directions) • Share the Road Bicycle legends (Both directions) • SW24-3 "AHEAD" signs approaching cros swalk In EL Lemon Avenue : lemon Avenue is approximately 38' (feet) In width with one lane In each direction and a dashed yellow center line. On the north side of lemon Avenue Is Temple City High Sc hool. lemon Avenue has a posted school speed limit sign of 25 MPH for westbound and eastbound travelers as well as a speed limit sign of 30 MPH for eastbound travelers only. Along the north side of lemon Avenue, entering lemon Avenue from Temple City Boulevard is approximately 50-feet of regular curb space with a posted sign that reads "1 HOUR PARKING 7:00AM-5:00PM". Preceding the regular curb space with parking restrictions of 1-hour Is intermittent white curb with parking signs of "3 MIN LOADING ZONE 7:00AM to 5:00PM" on CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By : Trans t ec h Engineers, Inc. I Page 4 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOUlEVARD AND AT (2) TI1ELAWNEY AVENUE school days. West of the school parl<ing lot, the parking conditions then change to "NO PARI<ING 7:00AM -5:00PM SCHOOL DAYS" without a permit. Parking conditions along the south side of lemon Avenue are "NO PARI<ING 7:00AM-5:00PM SCHOOL DAYS" without a permit. lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue Is stop controlled only In the south leg and uncontrolled In the east leg. During 7:30-9:00AM and 2:00- 3:30PM on School days the NB left turn movement is prohibited. There is only permit parking along Trelawney Avenue on school days 7:00AM-5:00PM. At Temple City Boulevard and lemon Avenue, the Intersection Is signalized with yellow ladder crosswalks in all legs. Along lemon Avenue between Temple City Boulevard and Oak Avenue, there are school SW24- 3 "AHEAD" signs with "SLOW SCHOOL XING" legends opposite the signs approaching the crosswalk on the east leg at the Intersection with Trelawney Avenue. There is additional signage and legends informing road users to share the road with bicyclists and pedestrians. lemon Avenue has no sidewalks along the south side of the roadway between Temple City Boulevard and Oak Avenue. land use is comprised of single-family homes and public facilities. On the northwest corner of lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard Is the Temple City High School. Figure 4: Street view of the existing yellow ladder crosswalks outlined with RPM's In all legs at the Intersection of lemon Avenue at Temple City Blvd Direction). CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 5 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL Tll AF FIC ANALYSIS FOCUSE D AT THE INTERS ECTIONS OF LE MON AV ENUE AT (1) TEMPL E CITY BOULEVAIIO AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENU E Figure 5 : Street view of Lemon Avenue towards Trelawney Avenue (WB Direction). School staff places con es In the street d school hours. ~----------------~~---------------g~ Figure 6 : Existing yellow ladder crosswalks In the south and east leg at the Intersection of Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue (WB Direction). School staff places cones and In-road pedestrian signs before school and after school let out. i'i=-FI: Figure 7: Street view of Lemon Avenue towards Trelawney Avenue (EB Direction). Buses park along Lemon Ave for after school teams. Figure 8: Existing Parking Conditions Along Lemon Avenue between Temple City Blvd and Oak Ave -The No Parldng signs also had a "without permit" below which Indicates residents are allowed to pari< on the street In .,,,.,,.u, .. rl ~ CITY OF TEMPLE CITY ~-----------------------------------------P~re_p_a-re~d~B-y-:T-ra-,-,s-t e-cl~l ~E n-g~ln_e_e -rs~,l~n -c.-I~Pa_g_e_G_o~f -34- TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY DOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENU E Figure 9: Existing Parldng Conditions Along Lemon Avenue between Temple City Blvd and Oal< Ave south side and partially on north side-The No Parking signs also have a "without permit" below which Indicates residents are allowed to pari< on the street In specified areas . Temple City Boulevard: Temple City Boulevard Is approximately 64' (feet) In width with two lanes in each direction with left turn pockets. The posted speed limit on Temple City Boulevard Is 35 mph except during school hours and times. There are two posted school speed limit signs for northbound and southbound travelers in addition to the 35 MPH speed limit sign along Temple City Boulevard. At this location, Temple City Boulevard Is classified as a primary roadway with single family homes along the east side of the roadway and publicfacllitles along the west side of the roadway. West ofT em pie City Boulevard Is Temple City High School . Parking Is permitted on both sides of the street in marked spaces. All directions of the signalized intersection have pedestrian count down signals with a wh.lte pedestrian symbol Indicating pedestrians to proceed changing to a flashing hand with a time count. There a re pedestrian buttons to activate the countdown only for pedestrians crossing east to west. The pedestrian signals for pedestrians crossing north to south are automatic with no pedestrian buttons. All directions of left turn traffic must yield to oncoming traffic and is consi de red as "permitted" timing. Temple City Boulevard as a primary arterial is designed to carry. a significant amount of commuter traffic. By keeping through traffic moving or flowing along these main arterials serves to lim it or minimize cut-through traffic onto adjacent re sid ential streets. Figure 10: Street view of the existing yellow ladder crosswall<s outlined with RPM's In all legs at the Intersection of Te City Blvd at Lemon Ave;:..:.n~u....::.e...!.:...:::....:.:...D....::.Ire.:...c~t~lo....::.n.:..;.). _________ ==,__----, .. -.. 1'----CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By : Trans tech Engineers, Inc. I Page 7 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS Of LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVAI1D AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Figure 11: Street view of the existing yellow ladder crosswalks outlined with RPM's in all legs at the Intersection of Temple City Blvd at Lemon Avenue (NB Direction). The placement of RPM's along crosswalks serves to Increase nighttime vlsibll of crossing pedestrians. ~ Figure 12: Pedestrian Countdown Figure 13: Push Button -Street Box. Note: All school age view of the existing pedestrian bicyclists rode on sidewalk. signal and pedestrian buttons. Figure 14: Parking Restriction signage on Lemon Avenue -.----------,~~----------~ -------------,~r==w.~~-----~-----------.~ Trelawney Avenue : Trelawney Avenue Is approximately 38' (feet) in width with one lane In each direction separated by a dashed yellow center line. The Intersection of lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue Is stop controlled In the south leg (Sl) with yellow ladder striped marked crosswalks In the south leg (Sl) and east leg (El). The east leg crosswalk Is uncontrolled. A crossing guard was present during peak AM and AFT hours. Trelawney Avenue is a residential roadway with a prima facie speed limit of 25 mph. Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue Is stop controlled only In the south leg. There are no sidewalks leading from the curb return In the southeast corner down Trelawney Avenue or on lemon Avenue . No northbound left turns are allowed from Trelawney Avenue onto lemon Avenue during peak school hours (7:30AM to 9:00AM and 2:00PM to 3:30PM School Days). CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By : Trans tech Engineers, Inc. I Page 8 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Figure 15: Street view of the existing yellow ladder crosswall<s In the south and east legs at Lemon Avenue and Trelawn Avenue (EB Dire Figure 16: Street view of the existing southeast corner with narrow landing pad for pedestrians with no sidewalks as well as the turn s for NB left turners du eal< school hours. NB Direction Figure 17: Street view of the existing yellow ladder crosswalks In the south and east legs at Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue Direction CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By: Trans te ch Engineers, Inc. I Page 9 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HI GH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Figure 18: Street view of the existing yellow ladder crosswalk In the south leg at Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue (NB Direction). School staff places the In-road signs and cones In the AM and AFT hours before the bell Average Dally Traffic (ADT): Dally vehicle counts were conducted to determine the average daily t raffic on a typical weekday traveling on Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue. Based on the 24-hour tube counts, Lemon Avenue has an ADT of 2,987 vehicles per day. Additionally, 24-hour tube counts were taken on Trelawney Avenue. Trelawney Avenue has an ADT of 573 vehicles per day. Per the Temple Ci ty Zoning Map, land use In the subject area is considered single-family residential with public facilities. ADTs were collected on Thursday, March 15, 2018. Please refer to Table 1: Average Dally Traffic (ADT). Table 1 : Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Date Counts Collected: Thursday, March 15, 2018 Location Total Vehicles Per Day Lemon Ave W/0 Trelawney Ave 2,987 Trelawney Ave S/0 Lemon Ave 573 Vehicle Peal< Hour Turning Movement: To determine the amount of conflicting and turning traffic that occurs at the intersections of (1) Lemon Avenue at Temple City Bou levard and (2) Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue. Turning movement counts were conducted as follows: Table 2: Vehicle Peak Hour Turning Movement Count Information Count Date Count Time Count Locations Thursday, 1. AM Count: 6:45AM-~:45AM (2 h our co unt) 1. Lemon Avenue and Temple AprilS, 2018 2. AFT Count: 1:45PM-3:30PM (1.5 hour count) City Boulevard 3. PM Count : 4:00PM-5:30PM (1.5 hour count) 2. Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue I CITY OF TEMPLE CITY ---~~~ Prepared By: Trans tech Engineers, In c. I Page 10 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENU E AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT {2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE The turning movement diagrams below present the highest amount of traffic for each 1-hour study period . The hours for the counts w ere tal< en during what i s considered as "indu stry st andard count times" and reflects commuter traffic as well as school traffic based on the school start and end times . FIGURE 19-A FIGURE 19-8 FIGURE 19-C Turning Movement Diagrams ~ Turning Movement Diagrams ~ Turning Movement Diagram s Temple City Blvd & Lemon Ave Temple City Blvd & Lemon Ave Temple City Blvd & Lemon Ave 7:45a.m. to 8:45a.m. 13:45 to 14 :45 16:00 t o 17:00 om "-86 01 "-31 00 "-29 g ::l ~ m m ~ 01 11101' )~\. )~\. Ill rl '<t ~ 103 ._.._37 )!~ ~ 27 r46 r1 9 r10 ·- so _I )f(' 28_1 )f(' 26 _} )t(" 75 --+ 24--+ 34~ 148 ~ 55 ~ 5 7~ N "' ... "' ~ :: m10r~ Ill ... N ... OO M N "' ... ... Ill rl FIGURE 20·A FIGURE 20·8 FIGURE 20-C Turning Movement Diagrams ~ Turning Movement Diagrams ~ Turning Movement Diagrams Trelawn ey Ave & Lemon Ave Trelawney Ave & Lemon Ave Trela wney Ave & Lemon Ave 7 :45 a .m. t o 8:45a.m. 14:45 to 15:45 1 6:00 t o 17:0 0 ~ 261 -+--157 4( 117 r9 r22 r14 114--+ )'(' 140--+ ) (' 96 ~ ) (" 40~ 38 ~ 11~ rl m 01 00 N 01 .... '<t '<t It was s uggested at the commission meeting that one of the options for the Intersection of Temple City Boulevard at Lemon Avenue could be the installation of protected left turn phasi ng for all directions. Since separate signal phases for protected left turns will reduce the green time av ailable fo r ot he r pha ses , the CAMUTCD (Section 40.19) provides thresholds and guidelines to follow before pla cin g protected left turn phasing. Guidance: Protected left turn phases should be considered where such alternatives couldn't be utilized, and one or more of the following condition s exist: . 1. Collisions-Five or more left turn collisions for a particular left turn movement during a recent 12- month period. NOT MET ~------:-:-~· I CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Pr e pared By : Tra nst ech Engin eers, In c. I Page 11 o f 34 ~ ~ TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE 2. Delay-Left-turn delay of one ~r more vehicles, which were waiting at the beginning of the green Interval and are still remaining in the left turn lane after at least 80% of the total number of cycles for one hour. NOT MET 3. Volume-At new intersections where only estimated volumes are available, the following criteria may be used. For pretimed signal or a background-cycle-controlled actuated signal, a left turn volume of more than two vehicles per approach per cycle for a peal< hour; or for a traffic- actuated signal, 50 or more left turning vehicles per hour in one direction with the product of the turning and conflicting through traffic during the peal< hour of 100,000 or more. (Table 3) NOT MET 4. Miscellaneous. Other factors that might be considered include but are not limited to: Impaired sight distance due to horizontal or vertical curvature, or where there are a large percentage of buses and trucks. Table 3: Left Turn Volume and Conflicting Through Volume-Hourly (Heaviest Peak) TIME Northbound Southbound NB LT SB Thru Product SBLT NB Thru Product 7:45am to 8 :45am 116 633 73,428 23 1144 26,312 14:45 to 15:45 57 741 42,237 44 474 20,856 16:00 to 17:00 52 1098 57,096 47 616 28,952 As seen In the above table the left turn movements did not exceed the threshold for accidents nor volume so protected left turn phasing Is not recommended at this Intersection . The east-west directions had less left turn traffic and through movements so were also determined to not exceed thresholds . A level of service analysis was also conducted at the intersection of Temple City Boulevard at Lemon Avenue. The Intersection under existing conditions and existing geometric conditions will operate at LOS B during AM peak hours, LOS B during Afternoon peak and LOS A during evening peak hours with average delay to vehicles at acceptable levels. Pedestrian Counts: Pedestrian counts were also taken at each intersection to determine how many pedestrians use these crosswalks at the intersections of (1) Lemon Avenue at Temple City Boulevard and (2) Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue. The pedestrians counts were conducted as follows: Table 4: Pedestrian Count Information Count Date Count Time Count Locations Thursday, 4. AM Count: 6:45AM-8:45AM (2 hour count) 3. Lemon Avenue and Temple AprilS, 2018 5. AFT Count: 1:45PM-3:30PM {1.5 hour count) City Boulevard 4. Lemon Avenue and 6. PM Count: 4:00PM-5:30PM {1.5 hour count) Trelawney Avenue 1:----------------------------------------~----~--~-C_IT~Y_O~F~T_E _M_P_LE_C~IT __ V Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 12 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HI GH SCHOOL TRA FF IC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTI ONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOUL EVAR D AND AT (2) TR ELAWNEY AVENU E Table 5: Pedestrian Count Information for Temple City Boulevard and Lemon Avenue Date Counts Collected : Thursday, Ap r il 5, 201 8 North-South Street: Temple City Bo ulevard East-West Street: Lemon Avenue North Leg South Leg East Leg TIME Adult School Total Adult School Total Adult School Total Adult Age Age Peds Age Age Peds Age Age Peds Age 6:45am-7 :15am 0 32 32 1 2 3 2 11 13 0 3 0min 7 :15AM -7:45AM 0 20 20 0 3 3 0 2 2 3 30min 7 :45AM -8 :15AM 3 71 74 0 27 27 4 22 26 4 30mln 8 :15AM-8:45AM 1 8 9 0 0 0 1 3 4 1 30min 1 :45PM -2 :15PM 2 11 13 0 3 3 1 1 2 1 30 rriin 2:15PM -2 :45PM 3 2 5 0 5 5 0 0 0 5 3 0min 2:45PM -3 :15PM 0 77 77 0 30 30 1 33 34 0 30min 3 :15PM -3:30PM 0 5 5 0 3 3 1 2 3 0 15 min 4:00PM -4:30PM 0 6 6 2 3 5 2 3 5 1 3 0mln 4:30PM -5 :00PM 3 3 6 0 3 3 1 0 1 3 30 min 5 :00PM -5:30PM 1 2 3 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 30 min SUBTOTAL 13 237 250 3 81 84 13 78 91 18 PEDESTRIANS TOTAL 612 PEDESTRIANS West Leg School Age 5 10 41 2 2 4 80 10 8 6 1 169 ~~--------------------------·------~----~----~-----C_IT~Y_O~F~T_E M __ P _LE_C~IT_Y ~~~ Prepa red By: Tr ans t ec h Engineers, Inc. I Pa ge 13 of 34 Total Peds 5 13 45 3 3 9 80 10 9 9 1 187 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOl TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED ATTHE INTERSECTIO NS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY DOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVE NUE Table 6: Pedestrian Count Information for Trelawney Avenue and Temple City Boulevard Date Counts Collected: Thursday, April 5, 2018 North-South Street: Trelawney Avenue East-West Street: Lemon Avenue East Leg South Leg TIME Adult School Total Adult School Age Age Peds Age Age 6:45AM -7:15AM 2 129 131 0 57 30min 7:15AM -7:45AM 1 48 49 2 21 30min 7:45AM -8:15AM 2 203 205 0 94 30mln 8:15AM -8:45AM 2 5 7 2 2 30mln 1:45PM-2:15PM 1 32 33 2 30 30mln 2:15PM -2:45PM 2 2 4 2 6 30min 2:45PM-3 :15PM 0 124 124 0 177 30min 3:15PM -3:30PM 0 15 15 0 22 15 min 4:00PM -4:30PM 0 2 2 0 3 30mln 4 :30PM-5:00PM 2 4 6 1 9 30min 5 :00PM-5:30PM 0 1 1 0 2 30mln SUB TOTAL PEDESTRIANS 12 565 577 9 423 TOTAL PEDESTRIANS 1,009 Total Peds 57 23 94 4 32 8 177 22 3 10 2 432 As shown in the above counts, the number of p edestrians using the crosswalk near the high school Is significant during AM and AFT peak periods which coincide with the school bell schedu le. As seen In the Trelawney ~venue and Lemon Avenue Pede strian counts 300 pedestrians use d the marked crosswal ks at school let out all within a 30 min period. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared lly : Tran stech Enginee rs, Inc. I Page 14 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TIIAFFICANALYSIS FOCUSED ATTHE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY IIOULEVARD AND AT (2.::!.) .:..:.TR.:.:::E:::._LA:..:..W:..:..N.::._EY:....:.A.:..:.V.::.:EN.:..:U.:.:::E ________ _ Bicycle Count: As part of the project the number of bicycles crossing the intersection of Temple City Bou levard and lemon Avenue were recorded. As observed all bicycles crossing this intersection used the crosswalk and were high school age students. The majority of bicycles continued to the high school by riding on the sidewalk. This could be due to the fact that during peak school hours there were a significant amount of. cars weaving to the curb to pick up/drop off students along lemon Avenue. Table 7: Bicycle Count in 30 Minute Increments Time by 30 M i n North leg South leg East leg West leg 06:45 -07:15 0 1 2 0 07 :15·07:45 0 0 0 0 07:45-08:15 3 0 4 3 08:15-08:45 1 0 1 0 13:45-14:15 4 0 0 1 14:15-14:45 3 1 0 0 14:45-15:15 2 3 3 7 15:15-15:30 1 0 1 2 16:00-16:30 1 1 2 2 16:30-17:00 0 1 2 2 17:00-17:30 0 0 0 0 Total Bil<es 15 7 15 17 Radar Speed Survey: To determine actual speeds along lemon Avenue, a radar speed survey was conducted on lemon Avenue between Oak Avenue and Trelawney Avenue on Thursday, March 15, 2018 over a 24-hour period. The radar measurements followed guidel ines and procedures outlined in the eve Sections 627, 21400, 22358 and the CAMUTCD 2B.13 . Table 8 below shows the 2018 speed survey results: Tabl e 8: Radar Speed Survey for Lemon Ave between Oak Ave and Tre iawney Ave Dir. of Date/Time of 85%ile 50% lie 15%ile Posted location Travel Survey Speed Speed Speed limit MPH Lemon Avenue: Oak Ave to 3/15/18 1 Trelawney Ave EB/WB 32 26 26 30 24 -HR As shown in Table 8, the speed samples taken on March 15, 2018 show that the 85th percentile speed of vehicles is at 32 MPH . The 85th percentile Indicates that 85% of the veh i cles sampled were traveling at 32 mph or lower. The 8St 11 % is slightly high e r than the posted speed limit of 30 MPH or 25 MPH when children are present in a school area. Currently, there is a 30 mph posted speed limit sign for eastbound travelers entering lemon Avenue from Oak Avenue and two 25 mph school speed limit signs for eastbound and ~~---------------------------C-IT_Y_O_F_T_E_M_P_L_E _CI~T_Y • Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 15 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOO L TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED ATTHE INTERSECT IONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY DOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENU E westbound travelers. The survey samp le showed t hat during bell periods the 10 mph pace of vehicles was between 20 mph to 29 m ph with speeds slightly Increasing after kids were not on the street. Accident Data: As part of th e engineering review process a search of all accidents that may have occurred along Lemon Aven ue was undertaken. Accid ent d ata was obtained from the computerized accident records system maintained by the Sta t e of Ca lifornia Statewide Integ rated Traffic Record s System (SWITRS) between the years of June 2012 to 2018 ava ilable data . The following enlists the number of accidents that occurred at l emon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard, lemon Ave nue and Trelawney Avenue and mid block accidents along Lemon Avenue be tween Temple City Boulevard and Oak Avenue. Lemon Ave and Trelawnel£ Ave Lemon Ave and Tem~le Cltll Blvd Midblocl< on Lemon Ave • 2018 -0 accidents • 2018 -1 accident • 2018 -0 accidents • 2017 -1 accident • 2017 -2 accidents • 2017 -1 accident • 2016 -0 accide nts • 2016 -4 accidents • 2016 -1 accident • 2015 -0 accidents • 2015-2 accidents • 2015 -0 accidents • 2014-0 accidents • 2014 -4 accidents • 2014 -0 accidents • 2013 -0 acci dents • 2013 -1 accide nt • 2013 -1 accident • 2012-0 acci dents • 2012-4 accidents • 2012-0 accidents According to the SWITRS accident d ata, there has been a total of 1 reported accident at the intersection of Lemon Avenue and Trelawn ey Avenue, 18 accidents at the Intersection of Lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard, and a total of 3 reported accidents that occurred midblock on Lemon Avenue between Temple City Boulevard and Oak Avenue. Please refer to Table 9: Accident Summary for detailed list of the accident history. Loc ation Trelawney Ave and Lemon Ave LEMON AVE AT EB THRU VEH HIT 1 TRELAWNEY AVE 8/28/2017 8:02 AUTO/PED INJ (1) NB PED IN XWA LK (R-O-W PED) TEMPLE CITY SB LT VEH STRUCK 1 BLVD AT LEMON 0 02/03/2018 06:20 AUTO/BIKE INJ NB BICYCLIST (40 AVE YEARS OLD-VEH IMPAIRED) TEMPLE CITY WB LTVEH HIT SB 2 BLVD AT LEMON 0 10/6/2017 15:22 BROADSIDE PDO THRU VEH AVE (R -0-W AUTO) 1--· CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By: Trans tech Enginee rs, Inc. I Page 16 of 34 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1-- 15 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTEilSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE TEMPLE CITY WB THRU VEH HIT BLVD AT LEMON 0 11/28/2017 10:00 AUTO/PED INJ (1) SB PED IN XWALK AVE {R-0-W PED) ~ NB LTVEH HITSB TEMPLE CITY THRU VEH AND EB BLVD AT LEMON 0 1/15/2016 7:55 BROADSIDE PDO STPED VEH AVE (R-0-W AUTO) TEMPLE CITY SB THRU VEH HIT BLVD AT LEMON 0 1/9/2016 23:10 REAR END INJ (1) SB STPEDVEH AVE {UNSAFE SPEED) TEMPLE CITY NB LTVEH HIT SB BLVD AT LEMON 0 5/5/2016 8:30 BROADSIDE INJ (2) THRU VEH AVE (R-0-W AUTO) TEMPLE CITY WB THRU VEH HIT BLVD AT LEMON 0 7/31/2016 11:10 BROADSIDE INJ (2) SB THRU VEH AVE (STOP SGN I SIG) SB THRU VEH LEMON AVE AT TEMPLE CITY 0 6/23/2015 11:30 REAR END PDO (IMPAIRED) HIT SB STPEDVEH BLVD (UNSAFE SPEED) SB THRU VEH HIT TEMPLE CITY NB LTVEH AND NB BLVD AT LEMON 0 5/8/2015 16:30 BROADSIDE PDO STPED VEH AVE (R-0-W AUTO) LEMON AVE AT SB RTVEH HITWB TEMPLE CITY 0 12/5/2014 9:02 BROADSIDE PDO THRU VEH BLVD {UNKNOWN) NB LT BICY HIT BY TEMP LE CITY BLVD AT LEMON 9' s 6/7/2014 13 :53 AUTO/BIKE INJ (1) SB THRU VEH (BICY MAKING AVE IMPROP TURN) TEMPLE CITY NB THRU VEH HI T BLVD AT LEMON 0 8/30/2014 23:32 BROADSIDE INJ (1) EBLTVEH AVE (STOP SGN I SIG) TEMPLE CITY NB THRU VEH HIT BLVD AT LEMON 0 12/16/2014 16 :24 REAR END INJ {1) NB THRU VEH AVE {TOO CLOSE) TEMPLE CITY SB PASSING VEH BLVD AT LEMON 26'S 5/22/2013 15:14 AUTO/BIKE INJ (1) HIT SB THRU BICY AVE (IM ~~OP PA ~)_- TEMPLE CITY SB LTVEH HIT EB BLVD AT LEMON 9' s 10/23/2012 9:44 AUTO/PED INJ (1) PED IN XWALI< AVE (R-0 -W PED) ~~-------------------------------------------------C~IT~V~O_F~T~EM~PL=E~C~IT~V ~~~ Prepared By: Trans te ch Engineers, Inc. I Page 17 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE liT (1) TEMPLE CITY OOULEVARD AND AT (2} TRELAWNEY AVENUE TEMPLE CITY NB LTVEH HITSB 16 BLVD AT LEMON 0 12/10/2012 15:30 BROADSIDE INJ (2) THRU VEH AVE (R-0-W AUTO) TEMPLE CITY 17 BLVD AT LEMON 0 12/19/2012 8:30 HITOBJ PDO EB RT VEH HIT OBJ AVE (1M PROP TURN) TEMPLE CITY WB THRU VEH HIT 18 BLVD AT LEMON 0 12/31/2012 7:10 BROADSIDE INJ (1) NB THRUVEH AVE (STOP SGN I SIG) Mldblocl< on Lemon Ave - LEMON AVE AT WB STPED VEH HIT 380' WB THRU BICY ·AND 1 TEMPLE CITY 4/6/2017 7:50 SIDESWIPE PDQ w WBSTPEDVEH BLVD (OTHER HAZ) LEMON AVE AT 114' NB BCKING VEH HIT 2 TEMPLE CITY 5/27/2016 8:20 BROADSIDE PDQ EB THRU VEH ·BLVD w (R-0-W AUTO) LEMON AVE AT 100' WB VEH ENT TRAFF 3 TEMPLE CITY w 12/20/2013 7 :45 SIDESWIPE PDQ HIT WB THRU VEH BLVD (STRTNG I BCI<NG) Criteria for Determining If Stop Control Is Warranted: In order to thoroughly assess potential measures that the intersection of lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue could benefit from, an analysis of all-way stop Installation was conducted. At Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue only the south leg is stop controlled, while the east leg Is uncontrolled. Traffic control devices work in concert with the basic "rules of the road" contained in traffic laws and ordinances. The California Manual of Uniform Traffic Devices (CAMUTCD) Section 2B .07 describes applications, warrants, and placement of STOP signs (R1-1). The STOP sign is a regulatory device that is used when traffic is required to stop. STOP signs are used to assign right-of-way at an Intersection. Multi-way control is used where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal. Stop signs are not used as a speed control device and should be used only where warranted. The placement of these signs is dictated by engineering judgment and based on guidelines found in the CAMUTCD and CVC. The City's follows the criteria for determining if two-way or all-way stop control is warranted as set by the CAMUTCD. These factors include minimum volume on each of the street approaches, accident investigation, speed of traffic, number of pedestrians and potential sight obstructions. All-Wav Stop Installation: The following briefly outlines the Criteria for the installation of All-Way stop warrants. All-WAY STOP CONTROL WARRANT FOR INSTALLATION CAMUTCD SECTION 28.07 The placement of All-Way stop control is warranted when: CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 1"'-------Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 18 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED ATTHE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMP LE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE A. Traffic contro l sig nals are justified NOT MET B. A crash problem exists as Indicated by 5 or more accidents In a 12-month period NOT MET C. Minimum Volumes are met if: 1. Volume entering intersec tion from the major approach (total of both approaches) averages 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day. NOT MET And 2. The combined vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle volumes entering the intersection from the minor street approaches averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours. NOT MET 3. If the 85 1h percentile approach speed of the major-street exceeds 40 mph, the minimum volumes are 70 percent of the above values . NOT MET Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include : A. The need to control left-turn conflicts B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near location s that generate high pedestrian volumes C. Locations where a ro ad user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless co nflicting cross traffic Is also r equired to stop D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood co llector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational cha racterl stics of the intersec tion. The traffic and pedestrian volume indicates the intersection does not meet or exceed minimum thresholds for more than 2 hours for the installation of all-way stop control so all-way stop control is not recommended at this location. Table 10: Peak Hour Approach Counts (8 Hours) East Bound Met Pedestrians Met and West Minimum Highest crossing M i nimum Threshold of Threshold of Bound Approach on Lemon at least 200 300 Vehicles Traffic on Trelawney Avenue TOTAL Time Lemon Ave per hour for Avenue during the Cars+ units per Both any 8 hours {Northbound) same peak Peds hour for the of an same8 Approaches Minor St traffic hours (Major average day {East Leg) hours Street) {both (highest approaches) approach)? 7:00-8:00 542 YES 30 180 210 YES 8:00-9 :00 389 YES 30 212 242 YES 9:00-10:00 91 NO 59 7 66 NO 13:00-14:00 91 NO 15 33 48 NO 14:00-15 :00 272 NO 21 128 149 NO 15:00-16:00 290 NO 15 17 32 NO 16:00-17:00 222 NO 14 6 20 NO 17:00-18:00 205 NO 15 1 16 NO M CITY OF TEMPLE CITY ~~~~~----------------------------------~P~re-p-a-re~d ~B-y:~T-ra-ns-te-c~h ~En-g~ln-ee-r-s,~ln-c-. ~,~P-ag-e~179~of~3~4 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUS ED ATTHE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMO N AVENUE AT (1) TEMPlE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TII ELAWN EY AVENUE Line of Sight at Intersections: The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) "A Polley on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets" and other engineering resources has se t up guidelines and standards for estimating line of sig ht at Intersec t ions. Improving Sight Lines at Crosswal/cs and Crossing Vehicles: At pedestrian cro ssi ng s and at side. street cross ings, generous sight distances and unobstructed sight lines allow motorists and pedestrians to detect each other in time to avoid collisions. Sight lines should be designed so that the motorist can observe th e movement of a pedestrian or a crossing motorist for a long enough period of time to accurately determine the approaching vehicles or pedestrians speed. If the motorist has only a brief glimpse of a waiting pedestrian or car they cannot observe their speed, and he or she may overestimate the speed and not sufficiently slow his or her approach to the crosswalk or not anticipate a crossing vehicle in time t o stop. A vehicle's driver needs to be able to have room to stop before colliding with some thing In the roadway, such as a pedestrian in a crosswalk, a stopped vehicle or road debris. To allow drivers to perce ive, rea ct, and safely stop, a minimum stopping sight distance must be available. Stopping sight distance Is defined as the sum of two distances (AASHTO, Green Book): 1. Reaction distance-the d is tance traveled by the vehicle from the Instant the driver sees an object necessitating a stop to the Instant the brakes are applied; plu s 2. Braking distance-the distance traveled by the vehicle from the Instant brake application begin s to the Instant when the vehicle has come to complete stop. The reaction distance Is b ased on the reaction time of the driver and the sp eed of the vehicle. The braking distance Is dep en dent upon the vehicle speed and the coefficient of friction between the tires and roadway. AASHTO (AASHTO Table 3-1 Stopping Sig ht Distance on Level Roadways) lists minimum recommended stopping sight distances based on design spee d and the sum of react ion distance and braking distance. At 25 mph, for example, 91.9 feet Is needed for reaction distance and 60 feet is ne eded for braking distance. When these numbers are added, and rounded, the total distan ce Is rounded to 155 feet. The stopping sight distance needed Is 155 feet for a street with a posted spee d of 25 mph. Table 11 : Stopping Sight Di stance Design Speed (mph) Brake reaction distance (ft) Braking distance on .. T,onn•nrr Sight Distance ~--------~~~~----------------; level Calculated Design (ft) (ft) (ft) Obstructions within Sight Triangles: At the decision point, the driver's eye height Is used for measurement. Any object within the sight triangle that would obstruct the driver's view of an approaching vehicle or a pedestrian waiting on a curb to cross should be removed or modified or appropriate traffic I I MiliA TO II CUAII 01 ~ "'ttW OIUIIIXmoH ---"t ~ \ ail8 I lOCAL I llftCU I l I 1--...!!01~0 ~ - -J'L--(U_ COOl 01 rAvtutH, "' ElOD 8TATe ltlOIIWAY -----------control devices should be Installed .as per the California Figure 21: Example of stopping Sight Dista nce Triangle ~ CITY OF TEMPLE CITY ~--------------------------------------Pr-e-pa-r-ed_B_y_:-Tr-an-s-te_c_h -En_g_l n-e-er-~-ln-c-.-~-P-a-ge_2_0_o_f_34- TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY DOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Obstructions within sight triangles could be buildings, vehicles, hedges, trees, bushes, tall crops, walls, fences, etc. the above figure shows a sight triangle and the clear view triangle. The intersection of Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue is stop controlled In the south leg only. Figure 22: Stopping Sight Distance Triangle for Vehicles Turning onto lemon Avenue from Trelawney Avenue. Red Curb Recommendations: For the south side of lemon Avenue, approxi mate ly 30' red on west side to driveway apron and approximately 20' west of driveway+ curb return, and approximately 70' red on east side rlv<>w~n' As well as 20' on the either si de of Trelawn Avenue south of the crosswalk. Figure 23: Stopping Sight Distance Triangle for Pedestrians Crossing at the crosswalk in the El. Red Curb Recommendations: For the north si de app roxim ately 52' of red curb west of crosswalk, and approximately 70' of red curb east of crosswalk. The same red curb recommendations apply for the south side due to the vehicle sto distance as shown In re 22 above. ------~~~------~--~--~~~~~~ ~-----------~~~ ~-CITY OFTEMPLECITY • Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 21 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOl TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF lEMON AVENUE /\T (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Figure 24: Stopping Sight Distance Triangle for Pedestrians Crossing at the West Leg Crosswalk, based on the Scenario of the Existing East Leg Crosswalk being Removed and Relocated to the West Leg. Red Curb Recommendation; For the north side approximately 70' of red curb west of crosswalk to th e 151 parking lot driveway, and approximately 76' of red curb east of crosswalk connecting to the existing red curb. The same red curb recommendations apply for the south side due to the vehicle stopping sight distance as s hown In F 22 above. Please refer to the following pages for recommendations and diagrams based on the analysis conducted. 1~------------------------,-------,-CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By: Transtech Enginee rs, In c. I Page 22 or 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED ATTHE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT ___________ _,(_,l)c....T_EM_PL_E..:C~ITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELA_WNEY AVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS The Installation of all traffic control devices on publi c streets are guided by the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices {CAMUTCD), the California Vehicle Code {CVC), and on an engineering study/judgement. Improvements at Lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard 1. In stall "stay back lines" I "yield Jines" approaching all crosswalks in each leg. This wili encourage vehicles to stop behind cro~swalk lines. 2. In sta ll pedestrian push buttons for pedestrians crossing north and south, make sure push button style matches the other existing push buttons for east/west crossing. 3. Install updated push button slgnage at all push buttons so that pedestrians know when to cross . See Image showing R10-3i to be lnstalied at each push button. 4. Increase the time for pedestrians to cross Temple City Blvd with pedestrians crossing a few seconds before vehicles are given a green. CAMUTCO Section 4E.06 '~t Intersections with high pedestrian volumes and high conflicting turning vehicle volumes, a brief leading pedestrian Interval, during which an advance WALKING PERSON Indication Is displayed for the crosswalk while red indications continue to be displayed to parallel through and/or turning traffic, may be used to reduce conflicts between pedestrians and turning vehicles." Also "At Intersections with pedestrian volumes so high that drivers have difficulty finding an opportunity to turn across the crosswalk, the duration of the green Interval for a concurrent vehicular movement can be Intentionally set to extend beyond the pedestrian clearance time to provide drivers additional green time to turn while the don't walk symbol is displayed." CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By: Trans tech Engine ers, Inc. I Page 23 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Improvements at lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue 1. Outline the existing yellow ladder crosswall<s in the south leg and the east leg with highly reflective yellow raised pavement markers (RPM). 2. Install shark teeth yield lines 30-feet In advance of the crosswalk for w estbound and eastbound travelers. 3. Install corresponding "YIELD HERE FOR PEDS" signs (Rl-5) adjacent to the proposed yield lines for eastbound and westbound travelers. 4. Install Double Sided Pedestrian Activated Flashing Beacons on top of existing Pedestrian crossing signs to draw attention to the crosswalk location. 5. Purchase (2) new YIELD to pedestrian in-road signs to be placed at each crosswalk by school staff during school hours to meet CAMUTCD guidelines for California. (Rl-6b) California law uses Yield to pedestrian signs. * The legend STATE LAW is optional. A fluorescent yellow-green background color may be used Instead of yellow for this sign. I "ff HERE ~· ~ Rl·5 STATE * LAW TO WIIH IH CROSSWALK nt·l Crosswalk Option 1: Leave the existing crosswalk In the east leg and Install improvements for increased line of sight. These Improvements would include the following: a) Installation of additional red curb along Lemon Avenue as shown in Figure 26 based on AASHTO's Stopping Sight Distance De.slgn Speed of 25 mph. For the north side app roximately 52' of red curb should be Installed west of the crosswalk, and approximately 70' of red curb should be Installed east of the crosswalk. The same red curb recommendations apply for the south side as shown In Figure 22 due to the vehicle stopping sight distance. The red curb recommendations take Into account the line of sight needed for vehicles turning out of Trelawney Avenue onto Lemon Avenue as well as for pedestrians Waiting to cross Lemon Avenue. b) Construct a larger landing pad for pedestrians to walt to cross by expanding the curb return with a mini bulb out or larger paved waiti ng area. lnll ~ll Ooub lo Sktod Pedostrran Activated Flas hlneBeacons on top or exhtfna Pede.s tff~n croutna 1lans to dta w altonuon to the cro uwalk loc.-Uon. CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By ; Trans te ch Engineers, Inc. I Page 24 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TnAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTEIISECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY OOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Crosswall< Option 2: Remove the existing east leg crosswalk and install a new crosswalk in the west leg to better accommodate the large number of students using the crosswalk coming from the west side of Trelawney Avenue. There is a larger landing pad area for waiting pedestrians as well as sidewalks leading up to the ramp. This option would also reduce the number of vehicle movements crossing over the crosswalk. The following Improvements would have to be implemented for this option: a) Full removal of the existing east leg crosswalk (sand blast) so It Is no longer visible. b) Removal of all pedestrian slgnage/posts at the crossing, and reconstruction the existing curb ramp on the north side of Lemon Avenue converting It to regular curb so there Is no remaining crossing Indication in the east leg. c) installation of a new yellow ladder striped crosswalk in the west leg. This would Include construction of a new ADA compliant curb ramp with truncated domes on the north side of Lemon Avenue. There is already an existing curb ramp on the south side. The post and signage from the removed crosswalk can be utilized for the new location. d) Installation of additional red curb along Lemon Avenue as shown in Figure 27 based on AASHTO's Stopping Sight Distance Design Speed of 25 mph. For the north side approximately 70' of red curb should be installed west of the new west leg crosswalk to the 1st parking lot driveway, and approximately 76' of red curb should be installed east of the new west leg crosswalk connecting to the existing red curb. The same red curb recommendations apply for the south side as shown in Figure 22 due to the vehicle stopping sight distance. The red curb recommendations take into account the line of sight needed for vehicles turning out of Trelawney Avenue onto Lemon Avenue as well as for pedestrians waiting to cross Lemon Avenue. Figure 27: Proposed Diagram for lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue (Removal of Existing East leg :ro!>SIIIIatll<. Installation of New West 1- lnsl.allallon a naw yellow lad1for stfrped ctossw.alk In tho west log. This woutd Include consUutUon CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Pre pored By: Tronstech Engineers, Inc. I Page 25 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIO NS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPL E CITY BO ULE VARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENU E ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Turning Movement Count for Lemon Avenue at Temple City Boulevard Attachment 2 : Turning Movement Count for Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue Attachment 3: Average Dally Traffic (ADT) Counts for Trelawney Avenue Attachment 4: 24 Hour Radar Speed Survey on Lemon Avenue Attachment 5 : Turning Movement Count for Lemon Avenue at Temple City Boulevard (Ri ght and Left Turns on Red) Attachment 6: LOS Calculati ons for AM Peal< Attachment 7: LOS Calculations for Afternoon Peal< Attachment 8: LOS Ca l culations for PM Peal< CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By: Tran stech Engin eers, Inc. I Page 26 o f 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCU SED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY OOULEVARD AND 1\T (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Attachment 1: Turning Movement Count for Lemon Avenue at Temple City Boulevard r ROJfCJ IIA»E: PROJEOTUO: OAl£: ~'"'''"'('"' 11019 lh!ttl ,.,,.. • totl TURNING M OVEM ENT COUNT AdulPtlh·hJndUWII Dlcycfu·h•,;t count mae u: 2 amun u ~:u cn yoLyp 2 ~:~s uu::err .o;u.,u,.o"'"-----,--- 1 r£oCO yt!I 10 TltiiQU a..__ 80Vll 00\AID U .a UA IIOtHID WI!STIIOU p r..ttl 1 t a:hoo~•o•r!'d :al rhnt U lfiT ltUlU IUOIIr U!FT lHHU RIOHT TOrAL Ufl 111RU IHOHT Un tlllU IIIOifr J OrAl rll S L Cl Ylt. OU 0-01:.45 201 tat I Ut t U ... ·~ __ .. __!!! ' I "' " >01 I I ' • ' • •• I I t4:00•1411S " ... ' " Ill II . .. • " " ' 10 • 10 II ' I I 14tii·H:l0 10 I U • • "' II '" • • • • • • " t • t 14:30·U:4S .. ... " • "' II "' ' I II ' 14 II ., 1 • I f4 :4S·U:OO II "' • II Ul .. ... • " " ' " • " .. • 10 .. 11;00·11:11 II 10 • II ... .. 10$ 11 .. " • 10 .. 131 .. •• " II tl:l f •t f :IO " ... • " ... " ... 11 I II I 11 I " I • I 10 t i:JO •t t :4S 0 0 16;00·11:15 Ut 1S 260 Ol U .... 11:11-18::30 t10 U 214 01 I I II 10 P fO COUtiT e duft•a•p•d~•trt•r • 1/L S L f L 'M.. ' I t • I I P!Kf CO Utf!~ Otlltl ' Ill 8l l:l.. WL I • ---; • ' 1 t 1 I 1 • ' I • • I I • tt~tM$!45 U 141 1 2 rt U <lit 1 U A <l.t l:~"~'·t·-~~~~,oo~t::::~·.~•,l:::j11~114:11+_-_-_--:C~It-·----...:""'1~'~::~·~1:t'""------=•"'•t::::~1;=1~1 ~:::::;~::::::~1:-'0f::::~·~·~::::~~::::::~t::::::it1::::~•.;t•'l_-_-_-:_,-'!t-t---_-_-_11---_-_-:l-+--_-_-..,~t-~--..;..:l-1---_-tt---_-...:""'tt---_-_-_\t---_-_f.l-_-_-_-'_.l:_-_-_-_l-l -------l..:t U.00·17:i5 tl H 2 11 11 112 t O II 61 ~"~"f'·~··~··~ot:~1~·~~~~··~==~==~·~·~~·~«~==~1·t=~··~·,~~~·==~t===·~l~==~==~:::~t-=::2·~1::::::j~::::1t::::~::::::::~I=~·---I--~I----~--~--4--------~1 7:JO·I7:45 t7:U·11:00 " ., 1" •• .. •• .. .. •• PEIIK·HOU R VOLUME ANALYSIS CMCl&AUDPCAKHOUflYOLYAIU,.\Irl [l n Ell <1.1 U l 2l Sft Sf SL I :U·f:U Ill Ill NR UO U t WR WI I'll QALC\&IttCO r CAK I! OUR YOLUNiil.fiOOI! fl .,. '" u nt 211 an Ill II BT liT Ill S l "" 2Z WR •n Wl JiA.lC\A.A t EQfi!AX lfOUH VQI.UMUi'H [l .. . .. u 1091 .. , I ll ST SL Ill .. 11.00 ·11;00 llf ... nn 21 WR wr I'll .. .. II " .. 11 .. 27 t O 10 ,. ... .. •• •• " " " AD.IUJ tlQtfAK I!OUR yPLU)([$-Ay [L ET •• 100 ,, 2J SA ST Ill "' "" '" 1144 WI! WJ VI\. ADJUJICQC[!AK !IOU/I YOLUI,!!S·IIOOU u .,. •• .. 74 1 .... ... Ill •• ar U~U·tJ :JO liT . .. Dl "" u ~oJUS J(DffAKifOUUVOLUyts=NI u .. ER J-4 •to t • •• Ill .. ST 11.00·17:10 In . .. fiR .. WA vn VI\. \VII IYJ I'll. .. '" •• •• .. .. II ~~---------------------------------------------------------------------------C __ ITY ___ O __ F~T __ E __ M __ P __ LE __ C __ IT __ Y ~~~ Prepa red By : Trans tech Engi neers, Inc. I Page 27 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Attachment 2: Turning Movement Count for Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT PROJ(Cf UAU.£: h"'"'C!!c hlttt i!U~l'! AcN~Ptd't ·htndcovnt Ok;ttiU•l\lllctCtK~I'I\ PROJECT flO: UAT£: 1/UE 1!010 ~ II~SJAUiT: .!lBilJ~ .. L.AO)W![II .. II..! ,,--.,-,--:--E·\~S1RI!E:~ U~~lf f J f Scho!!;,c;,~t::lll•rt• noRmoouun sourHnou1 u..s usroou o vurnouro E·W I J1 1 ' U llfT TIIAU JI!Oitf lEft lllfiU Rlottr TOTAL lEfT lfiRU Rtollr Uff li!RU niOUf TOTAL PIL SL El YIL Ill PEDCOUilf f,da~llptdtslrlant &L El ' OJt<£couur~ Olht . I YIL IlL 6L £\. YIL ·~!----::1--+--::,:;1 ,. t1 .. 2 ,. 62 " u ~:~;~~~:~=~:~~.:t~===~====t==~~~===t===~~===l~===·j:t~~~~-:-~_:-_:-~~~~:=:-~~~--~;·~ .. ~:t~-:_~~-:,~·t-:_~~-:,~.~:~:~·-=~--=~-i~-~--=~·~:;::,:--=~--=:t_=~-~j:;~::~-=~-·;~::;:-=-=~=-=~t===r==~i===~··===~f==~t==jf===-~----==~ ot:o~s.ot.Go n n u to t u tt2 u u OI.OO.OI:U 24 24 U U 101 202 OUUI:U U 2 l 4 tt .. :JO.OI:45 ,, u n IJ:AS·t.f;OO 20 U U 81 " • Ill • H;GO-U:tS U U 72 1l 21 14:11-U:JO I I U 42 I 2 u:Jo.u:<ts u .ft n • .c t4:-41·U:OO U 11 4 1 101 I t U IU"·U:U U 31 10 U tt 160 106 tU ~:.~,~~:~:!:~;:~:-l----1----~---~---l·----~--+---~·~---l---~··~--~--~--~·~·l·----·l-~·~:l----+-~'~'~~··,l----+---+--~--_,, __ ~ ____ ,r-~~--+----l IU0·1f:l6 1t U ll tt:11--t f :JO If tl 41 tUO-II:.U U U 69 ~::~;:f::~:;~;:;:t---~---~--~ll ----4----t---1--~l---~--~::~--~--~--~:;;~:-----r-~:~:l----+---~--~f----r----r-~T---!r--~---t---1----t---1 17;15-17:30 2t ,. •• f1:l 0·11:45 0 ll':U·II.OO f'EAK·~IOUR VOLUME ANALYSIS CAlCUlAUQ prAK t!OUR \'()LUUES"Y AOJUSUO PfAK UOlJR VOlVNES:AU 114 •• n •• '" •• IlL •• "' 5L IIR •• WA "'' VIL "' 14 ... " EL .. "' an Ill ' •• liT "" VIA YfT ttl Wl pAlntiLAJEQPiAKI!OU!! yotUU[JJmOU AOJUSJEO PEAK HOUR yotUh!UJ«OOU ,. 21 .. II (L .. '" 0 0 0 Ill IT IlL liT IIR .. wn WT WL CAlCUlAUD P€AK HOUAVOLUUESfU [l .. [R • •• IlL .. 10,00·17:00 liT Sl "" " "" wr YIL • ... u "' 14 ... .. .. ' ~· Ef ER '" 1/L •• ltr liM .. ADJ!J SIEDpEAtS flOUR YOLUI.IES£H ll •• •• •• IlL ar S l H.t O·ti:I O '" "" )'IR vrr WL VIA IVT I'll "' .. .. m CITY OF TEMPLE CITY liiii~-------------------------------------------P-r-e-pa_r_e~d-B-y-:T-r-an-s-te-c~h-E--n-g-ln_e_e-rs-,-,n-c-.~~-P-a_g_e_2_8_o~f-3-4 .. TEMP LE CIT Y HIGH SCHOO L TRAFF IC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTEII SECTION S OF LEM ON AVENUE AT (1) TEMP LE CIT Y BOUL EVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENU E Attac hment 3 : Average Dall y Tr affic (AD T) Co un t s fo r Tre l awn ey Aven ue Day: Thursday Date: 3/15/2018 Plep.,.db~NOS/AlO VOLUM E Trelawney Ave S/0 l emo n Ave City: Temple City ProJect II: CA1 8_518 1_00l DAILY TOTALS I Total 573 ! AM Period : NO so EO WB TOTAL I PM Period NO so EO wo TOTAL 00:00 0 0 0 12:00 1 2 3 00 :1 5 0 0 0 12:15 2 0 2 00:30 0 0 0 12:30 3 G 9 00:45 1 1 0 1 1 12:45 3 9 2 10 _5 1 9 0 1:00 0 0 0 13:00 4 4 8 01:15 0 0 0 13:15 3 1 4 01:30 0 0 0 13:30 1 2 3 01 :45 0 0 0 13:45 7 1 5 2 9 9 24 02:00 0 0 0 14:00 7 12 19 02:1 5 0 0 0 14 :15 4 5 9 02:30 0 0 0 14:30 4 4 8 02:45 0 0 0 1 4:45 6 21 3 2 4 9 45 03:00 0 0 0 15:00 9 24 33 03:15 0 0 0 15:15 3 7 10 03 :30 1 0 1 15:30 2 8 10 03:45 0 1 0 0 1 15:45 1 1 5 2 4 1 3 56 04 :00 1 0 1 16:00 4 2 6 04:15 0 0 0 16:15 3 5 8 04:30 0 0 0 16:30 6 3 9 04:45 0 1 0 0 1 16:45 1 14 3 13 4 27 05:00 1 0 1 17:00 5 G 11 05:15 0 0 0 17:15 3 s 8 05:30 0 0 0 17:30 5 3 8 05 :45 1 2 0 1 2 17:45 2 15 7 21 9 !16 06 :00 4 1 5 18:00 3 4 7 06 :1 5 3 0 3 18:15 1 G 7 0 6:30 0 1 1 18 :30 2 2 4 06:45 1 8 0 2 1 10 18:45 3 9 1 13 4 22 07:00 G 2 8 1 9:00 2 3 5 07:15 3 3 6 19:15 2 0 2 07:30 11 7 18 19:30 2 3 5 07:45 10 30 2 14 12 44 19:45 1 7 0 6 1 13 08:00 3 4 7 20:00 3 2 5 08:1 5 3 8 11 20 :15 0 0 0 08:3 0 7 4 11 20:30 0 0 0 08 :45 1 7 30 22 38 39 68 20:45 1 4 0 2 1 6 0 9:00 14 26 40 21:00 0 2 2 09:15 6 s 11 21:15 1 1 2 09:30 23 3 4 57 21:30 1 0 1 09:45 16 59 28 93 44 1 52 2 1:45 0 2 2 5 2 7 10:00 2 3 5 22:00 0 1 1 10:15 4 2 6 22 :15 0 2 2 1 0:30 1 2 3 22:30 0 1 1 1 0:45 2 9 4 11 6 20 22 :45 0 0 4 0 4 11:00 1 2 3 23 :00 1 3 4 11:1 5 2 1 3 23 :15 0 0 0 11:30 1 1 ~-23:30 1 0 1 11:45 1 5 1 5 _10 2S :45 0 2 0 3 0 s TOTALS 146 163 !109 TOTALS 113 151 264 SPLIT " 47.2K 52.BK 53.9K SPLIT" 42.8" 57.2K 4&.1K DAILY TOTALS ~ IIMPtokHour 08:45 ouo 01:00 PM PIIkHour 14:15 14:AS 14:45 IIMPkVolumt GO 93 nz PMPkVol umo 2l 4 2 61 Pk Hr fact or 0.652 0.6811 0.117 Pk llrFICior 0.6)8 OAU OA70 7 ·9Volumo GO 52 .I I) sn 4 •1 Volumo 29 !4 il &S 7 ·9 Pelk Ho ur 07:00 08:00 08:00 4 • &Ptlk Hour 16:15 17:00 17:00 7 • trk Volum t J O sa " 4 ·0Pk Volumo 15 21 30 Pk HrFICIOI 0.68Z OA J 2 ,,...,, o c_.· OAJI Pk Hr flctor o.&2S 0 .750 ·.~J) ~·:0:,1 0.811 ~~--------------------------------------~------~-----C_IT_Y_O_F~T_E_M_P_l_E _C~I T_Y • Prepa red By : Tr ans tec h Engin ee rs, Inc. I Page 29 o f 3 4 I TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT TH E INTERSECTIO NS OF LEMON AVEN UE AT (11 TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (21 TR ELAWNEY AVENUE Attachment 4: 24 Hour Radar Speed Survey on lemon Avenue Day: lhurs~•Y 01101 3/15/1018 Day:Th urs d1y 01111 3/1 5/2018 01 :00 oz :oo 05 :00 04 :00 OS:OO 06:00 07100 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 U IOO PM 11:00 14:00 15:00 IG:OO 17:00 18 :00 U :OO 10:00 ltMVol umt t HfiM MIPIIUIOUI Volun~ PhtVo1umt t HPM PM Pulllovr Vol~otrl"f I I IH UI O;) 0 IC I N uoo u IOj IK OI Q) 41 I ~ IW •~co ,, D rtC Jionel Puk Ptrld1 AIISp ttdl 41 ~ .,, Ill! II H 0 100 u/,(1\) m It! 410 ,.. UN IIW u ru , . .., ,. 110 IIM7·9 V.lvmt 9JI ·-~ SPEED lemon Ave W/0 Trelawney Ave SPEED Lemon Av e W/0 Trolawn oyAv•! 110 14 I 0 •x Ill ~X 1<8 ~ "'1)) li t» 47 10 ' J/1 1>1 II I Ill! '" 0?< ON IAOO 11.:)1 !HI 18 01 70 1& I I IIOOII1z.2 " \'n V'N II V"'umt 31 " 115 ·-· 7?> 4H 0 q 0 0 0 0 PM4·6 t l ·-· 14" Cl1y: Ttmplo Cll y Profoct II: C/118_5181 _002 CIJy: Ttntplo Clly Profoct •: Cl\18_51 81_002 0 0 1111 ''" Ol(>l Ill 0 0 111. »K U (ll 110 Oil Peak Vo lu mu Yd UN !1 1414 ·-· 47" li1l CITY OF TEMPLE CITY ~~------------------------------------------P-r-e-p a_r_e_d _B-y:_T_r-an-s-te-c~h-E_n_g_ln_e_e-r s-,-,n-c-. ~~-P-a_g_e_3_0_o~f --34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLECITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Attachment 5: Turning Movement Counts for Right and left Turns on Red at lemon Avenue at Temple City Boulevard Turnin g Movomon\ Coun\ TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT PtGpMod by: o.c:. Trnrno lurvoya PROJEOT IMME: PROJEOTIIO: L TOY. Lo n lum on Yollow DillE: RTOn ·Righi Turn on nod ·1111 OJrocUona LTOR • Lon Turn on Rod liD onl• N·88TREETt T~MrLE CII! D ~Yil E·W8TREETt LEMOif t2 tt t o ~ 3 2 18 15 t ~ TIME 110 Tit OOUilO SOUTit OOUND II.S ei\8T00Utl0 uon LlOY RlOR uon LTOV RTOR TOTAl llOR LtOY RTOR 05:45.07:00 ' t 4 t o 07:00·07:15 2 10 2 t 3 18 e 07:15-07:30 3 I 4 I 07:30·07:45 t t 2 t 7 ON5.05:00 3 7 3 I 14 I I D 08:00·08:15 4 I 6 I 11 I 4 16 00:15·05:30 I 2 3 r----;a 08:30·00:45 I 1 I 6 13:45·14:00 t 1 1 4 14:00·14:16 t 1 t s 2 u 14:15·14:30 t 2 3 14:30.14:46 I 3 3 7 t 1 1 14:45·15:00 1 e I I I 10 • t i---J 16:00·16:16 2 2 4 16:16·15:30 I I ~ t a 7 15:30·15:45 0 15:00-10:15 1 ~ I 3 1 e 10:16·10:30 0 4 10:30.18:48 2 I s 6 10:40·17:00 3 I I t I 7 7 17:00·17:16 I t 2 t 2 17:16·17:30 t 1 2 e 17:30-17:45 0 17:45·10:00 --1-0 0 1 6 WESTODUIIO uon llOV mon t 5 2 tt 7 I 2 8 2 I I I 3 • 1 I I I 6 3 3 4 2 E·W lOT Ill ,17 10 12 If 12 20 20 11 7 20 3 17 12 14 10 0 10 8 7 7 12 e 0 0 Adult Podt • lrnnd count Die yolo• • hand cau n\ llnnd • IIYO QUEUEWIIITIIIO (l•tlya) I I I IIOl liOn son e on won - -- 1--- 1- M---------~~~~ CITY OF TEMPLE CITY ~~~ Prepared By: Trans tech Engin ee rs , Inc. I Page 31 of 34 TEMPL E CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE Attachment 6: lOS Calculations for AM Peal< MITIG9 -Existing ~1 Peak Thu May 3, 2018 10131124 Temple City School Circulation ~sses s ment Existinq Conditions .ru~ Peak Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 liCM Operations t1ethod (Futur~ Volume ~ltornative) Page 1-1 ··············································································~· Intersection D1 Temple City Blvd/Lemon Ave •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. ()(): 0.510 Loss Time (sec) 1 10 Average Delay (sac/vah) : 13 . 2 Optimal Cycle: 37 Level 0£ Service! B •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Street Name: Temple City Blvd Lemon Ave Approach: North Bound South Sound East Bound West Bound t1ovement: L - T -R L -T -R L -T - R L -'f -R ------------1---------------11---------------11 ---------------11---------------1 Controll Permitted Permitted Pormitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include rnclude Min . Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1'0 10 10 10 Y+RI 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4,0 Lane111 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 ------w---~-l e~-~~~~-~----~-II--------~-----~IJ --~------------Il ---------------1 Volum~ t-lodule:AM l'eak Base Vol: 116 1144 ~4 23 633 100 50 75 140 46 103 06 Growth lldj 1 1. 00 1. 00 l. 00 1. 00 1. 00 l. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Initial Bse: 116 1144 44 23 633 100 50 75 140 46 103 86 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 116 1144 44 23 633 100 50 75 148 46 103 86 Oser Adjl 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1 .00 1.00 PHF Volume1 116 1144 44 23 633 100 50 75 140 46 103 06 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 Reduced Vol: 116 1144 44 23 633 100 50 75 148 46 103 96 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1;00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 14LF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 Fina lVolumo: 116 1144 44 23 633 100 SO 75 140 46 103 96 ------------1 ---------------ll ---------------l 1---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lnne : 1000 1000 1000 1900 1000 lBOO 1900 1000 1000 1800 1000 1000 Adjustment: 0.33 0.97 1 .10 0 .19 0,92 1.08 0.49 0.77 0 ,73 0.51 0.01 0.83 Lanes: 1.00 1.93 0 .07 1.00 1.76 0 .24 0.51 0.49 1.00 0 .41 0.59 1.00 Final Sat.1 599 3378 130 343 2934 463 454 680 1317 382 855 1496 ------------1 --------------~1r---------------11 ------~--------11 ---------------r Capacity Analysis t~odule1 Vol/Sat: 0 .20 0,34 0 ,34 0.07 0 .22 0.22 0 .11 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.06 Crit Moves1 ***' **** Green/cyoler 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0,66 0.66 0.24 0,24 0 .24 0.24 0.24 0.24 Volume/Cap1 0.30 0.51 0.51 0.10 0.32 0.32 0.47 0,47 0.48 0.51 o.5i 0.24 Delay/Veh: 7,5 8.7 8 ,7 6.2 7,3 7.3 34.1 34.1 34.0 34.7 34,7 31.3 user OelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjOel/Veh: 7.5 8.7 8,7 6.2 7.3 7.3 34 ,1 34,1 34,0 34.7 34.7 31 .3 LOS by Move 1 A A A A A ~ C C C C C C HCN2kAVc,JQ: 2 9 10 · 0 5 5 3 4 4 4 5 2 ~··············································································· Traffix 9.0.0715 (c) 2009 Powling Assoc. Licensed to ~RANSTECJt, WALNUT, CA I CITY OF TEMPLE CITY . ~----------------------------------------P-r-e-pa-r-e d--By_:_T-ra-n-st_e_ch--En_g_ln_e_e~rs~,~ln-c.~I ~P~a~ge~3~2~o~f~3~4 1- TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOCUSED AT THE INTERSECT IONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TRELAWNEY AVENUE ------------- Attachment 7 : LOS Calculations for Afternoon Peak MITIG8 -Existing AFT Peak Thu t4ny 3, 2010 10:45129 Temple City School Circulation Assessment Existin9 conditions AFl' Peak Level Of service Computation Report 2000 IICH Operations Mothod (Futuro Volwne Alternative) Page 1-1 -··············································································· Interaection 01 Temple City Blvd/Lemon Ave •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Cycle (eec): 100 Critical Vol,/Cap. (Xlt 0, 356 J.ou Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/vehl : 11.2 Optimd Cyolet 30 Level Of Service: B ···············~································································ Street Name: Temple City Blvd Lomon Ave Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movomentc L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R ~-----------1---------------ll---------------ll ---------------ll---------------l Controlt Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rightst Include lncluda Include Inoluda ~lin. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 .10 10 10 10 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 ------------1---------------ll---------------ll---------------ll---------------l Volume Hodu1e:~ft peak Bose Volt 57 474 22 44 741 66 39 60 99 21 44 24 ~~owth Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 57 474 22 44 741 66 39 60 99 21 44 24 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 PaaserByVolt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 Initial Fut: 57 474 22 44 741 66 39 60 99 21 44 24 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 VHF Volumo: 57 474 22 44 741 66 39 60 99 21 44 24 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Roduoed Volt 57 474 22 4t 741 66 39 60 99 21 44 24 PCE Adj 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1•, 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume : 57 474 22 44 741 66 39 60 99 21 44 24 ------------l---------------ll---------------ll---------------1 1---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1000 1800 1800 1800 1800 1600 1800 1800 1000 1000 1600 1000 Adjustment: 0.30 0.97 1.10 0.44 0.93 1.09 0.52 0.01 0.79 0 .54 0.04 0.65 Lanes: 1.00 1.92 0.06 1.00 1.66 0.14 0,50 0.50 1.00 0.43 0.57 1,00 Final Sat.: 543 3352 1$6 783 3120 278 472 726 1427 416 871 1530 --w-w-------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Copaoity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.14 0.14 0 .06 0.24 0.24 0.08 0.08 0.07 0 .05 0,05 0.02 Crit Moves: **** *"** Greon/Cycle: 0.67 0.67 0 .67 0 .67 0.67 0.67 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 volume/capt 0.16 0.21 0.21 o.o8 o.36 0.36 0 .36 0.36 ·o.3o 0.22 0.22 0.01 Delay/Veh: 6 .4 6.5 6 .5 5.9 7.3 7.3 32 .9 32.9 32.2 31.4 31.4 30 .0 User OelAdj: 1.00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 AdjDel/Veh: 6.4 6.5 6.5 5.9 7.3 7,3 32.9 32.9 32.2 31.4 31.4 30.0 LOS by Move 1 A A A A A A C C C C C C HCM2k.AvgQ: 1 3 3 1 5 6 2 3 3 1 2 1 ··························~····················································· Traftix 0,0.0715 (c) 2000 Dowling .1\l!soc. Liconsed to 'l'RANSTECII, WALNUT, CA CITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. I Page 33 of 34 TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOO L TRAFFI C ANALYSIS FO!=U SE D ATTHE INTERSECTIONS OF LEMON AVENUE AT (1) TEMPLE CIT Y BOULEVARD AND AT (2) TR ELAWNEY AVENU E Attachm e nt 8: lOS Calculations for PM Peal< t<ll:TIGO -EKisting PM Peak '.l'hu May 3, 2019 11:03:21 Temple City School Circulation Assessment Existing Conditions PM Peak Levol Of Service Computation Report 2000 JICM Operations l~ethod (FUture Volume Alternative) l'nge l.-1 ~··~~··~-~~···~····~···········~················································ Intersection til Temple City Blvd/Lemon Ave ···········~······························~····································· Cycle (sec) : 100 Cdtical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0, 435 Loss Time (sec) 1 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): 6,9 Optimal Cyolet 3.3 Level Of Service: A ············~··~·······················~············~···~······················· StJ:eet Name : Temple City Blvd Lemon 1\ve Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bounct W~st Bound Movement: L -'l' -R L -T -R L -T • R · J. • '£ -R ------------1---------------ll---------------ll---------------ll---------------l Contr ol : Permitted Permitted Pe rmitted Permitte(l Rl.ghts: Include Include Include Include Min . Gr.een : 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4,0 4.0 4 ,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 ------------1 ---------------ll ---------------ll ---------------ll ---------------l Volume Module:PM Peak Base Vol: 52 616 21 47 1098 55 26 34 57 10 27 29 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 52 616 21 47 1090 55 26 34 57 10 27 29 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVo1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 52 616 21 47 1090 55 26 34 57 10 27 29 user Adj: 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t.oo 1.00 PHF Adj: 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 52 616 21 47 1098 55 26 34 57 10 27 29 noduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 52 616 21 47 1098 55 26 34 57 10 27 29 PC£ Adj: 1.00 1 ,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .00 1.00 MLF Adjl 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 &'ina'!Volurne: 52 616 21 47 1090 55 26 34 57 10 27 29 ------------1 ---------------ll---------------ll------------~--ll ---------------l Saturation Flow Nodule: Sat/Lane: 1800 1800 1000 1800 1800 1800 1800 1900 1900 1900 1800 1900 Adjustment: 0.22 0 .97 1.10 0,38 0 .94 1 .10 0.51 0.90 0 .79 0.55 0.86 0,85 Lanes: 1.00 1.94 0.06 1.00 1.92 o:oo 0.54 0.46 1 .00 0 .37 0.63 1.00 Final Sat.: 400 ·3394 116 688 3236 162 502 657 1427 364 984 1530 ------------1 ---------------ll ---------------l 1---------------11 ---------------1 Capacity ~alysis Module: Vo1/Sat : 0.13 0,18 0.19 0,07 0.34 0.34 0.05 o.os 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 Crlt Moves: •••• •••• Green/Cycle: 0.79 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0 .78 0.12 0 .12 0 .12 0.12 0.12 0 .12 Volume/Cap: 0.17 0.23 0.23 0.09 0 .43 0 .43 0.43 0.43 0.34 0.23 0,23 0.16 Delay/Voh: 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.6 3.7 3.7 43 .1 43 .1 41,6 40 ,'6 40 ,6 40.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 AdjDel/Voh: 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.6 3.7 3,7 43 .1 43.1 41.6 40.6 40.6 40.0 LOS by Move 1 1\ A 1\ A A A D D D D D D JIC~12kAvgQ : 1 3 3 0 6 7 2 3 2 1 1 1 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Traffix 0.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licens ed to TRANSTECII, WALNUT, CA I.---~~ __ GITY OF TEMPLE CITY Prepared By: Transtech Engin eers, Inc. I Pag e 34 of 34 1. CALL TO ORDER CITY COUNCIL TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA REGULAR MEETING MINUTES NOVEMBER 6, 2018 ATTACHMENT D Mayor Man called the City Council Regular Meeting to order at 7 :32 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 5938 Kauffman Avenue, Temple City. Councilmember Chavez made a motion to excuse Councilmember Yu for cause. Seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Fish . 2 . ROLL CALL PRESENT : Councilmember -Chavez, Sternquist, Fish, Man ABSENT: Councilmember-Yu ALSO PRESENT: City Manager Cook, Assistant City Attorney Murphy, City Clerk Kuo 3. INVOCATION-Reverend Elie Elbayadi , Temple Sheriff Station Chapel , provided the invocation . 4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -Boy Scout Troop 169 led the pledge of allegiance . 5. CEREMONIAL MATTERS-PRESENTATIONS A. DEPUTY RICK ADAMS -City Council recognized Deputy Rick Adams for his 17 years of service in Temple City. 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA Michael Miller, Temple City resident, made comments regarding excessive dog barking and coyotes in his neighborhood. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Man pulled Item 7H "Participation in the Ring Subsidy Program" for a brief discussion . H . PARTICIPATION IN THE RING SUBSIDY PROGRAM The City Council is requested to authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Ring, Inc . for the participation in the Ring Subsidy Program and approve a budget amendment in the amount of $20,000 to subsidize 400 Ring City Council Minutes November 6, 2018 Page 2 of 7 devices. Mayor Man briefly commented on public safety in the City. Mayor Man opened public comment. Jerry Jambazian, Temple City business owner, spoke in favor of the Ring Subsidy Program. Hearing no further request to speak, Mayor Man closed public comment. Councilmember Chavez made a motion authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Ring , Inc . for participation in the Ring Subsidy Program and approved a budget amendment in the amount of $20 ,000 to subsidize 400 Ring devices. Seconded by Mayor Pro Fish and carried by the following votes: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN : ABSENT: Councilmember-Chavez, Sternquist, Fish , Man Councilmember -None Councilmember -None Councilmember-Yu Councilmember Chavez made a motion to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar Items. Seconded by Mayor Pro Fish and carried by the following votes: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT : Councilmember-Chavez, Sternquist, Fish, Man Councilmember -None Councilmember -None Councilmember -Yu A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The City Council is requested to review and approve: 1. Minutes of the City Council Regular Meeting of October 16 , 2018 ; and 2. Minutes of the City Council Special Meeting of October 31, 2018. Action: Approved. B. TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION ACTIONS The City Council is requested to review the actions of Regular Transportation and Public Safety Commission Meeting of October 10, 2018 . Action: Received and filed. City Council Minutes November 6, 2018 Page 3 of 7 C . PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION ACTIONS The City Council is requested to review the actions of Regular Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting of October 17, 2018. Action: Received and filed . D. CONSIDERATION TO RELAX THE ENFORCEMENT OF OVERNIGHT PARKING RESTRICTIONS DURING THE HOLIDAY SEASON City Council is requested to relax the enforcement of overnight parking restriction from 12:00 midnight on Sunday, December 16, 2018 to 11:59 p .m. on Monday, January 7, 2019 . Action: Approved relaxing of overnight parking restriction enforcement from 12:00 midnight on Sunday, December 16, 2018 to 11 :59 p.m. on Monday, January 7 , 2019. E. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION The Southern California Association of Government's (SCAG) Sustainable Community Grant Program provides technical and financial assistance to SCAG member agencies for planning and policy efforts that further implements SCAG's Regional Transportation Plan. Staff recommends applying for the grant to fund for preparation of a Pedestrian Master Plan and Safe Routes to School Plan, as called for in the Mid-Century General Plan implementation program. Action: Authorized staff to submit an application to the Southern California Association of Governments for a 2018 Sustainable Communities Program grant to prepare a Pedestrian Master Plan and Safe Routes to School Plan. F. REAFFIRMING CITY'S DEFAULT ENERGY RATE WITH CLEAN POWER ALLIANCE Beginning in February 2019, Temple City residents will automatically be enrolled in the default rate option of 36% renewable energy program with the Clean Power Alliance. Action: Affirmed City of Temple City's default energy rate option with Clean Power Alliance. City Council Minutes November 6, 2018 Page 4 of 7 G . FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP APPROVAL FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 73435 , A LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION AT 5424 TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD City Council is requested to review and approve a lot split subdivision to create two new lots located at 5424 Temple City Boulevard. Action: 1. Reviewed and approved the final subdivision map for Parcel Map No . 73435; and 2 . Authorized the City Clerk to certify Parcel Map No. 73435 I. FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2018-19 FIRST QUARTER FINANCIAL STATUS REPORT ANDBUDGETAMENDMENTS City Council is requested to approve various budget appropriations for the FY 2018-19 City Budget to ensure actual spending levels are within budgeted appropriations during the current fiscal year. Action: Authorized staff to revise various budgeted appropriations for the FY 2017-18 City Budget. J. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 18-5367 APPROVING PAYMENT OF BILLS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018-19 The City Council is requested to adopt Resolution No. 18-5367 authorizing the payment of bills. Action: Adopted Resolution No. 18-5367 . 8. PUBLIC HEARING -None 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS -None 10. NEW BUSINESS A. TEMPLE CITY HIGH SCHOOL FOCUSED TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ANALYSIS AT THE INTERSECTION OF TEMPLE CITY BOULEVARD AND LEMON AVENUE, AND TRELAWNEY AVENUE AND LEMON AVENUE The City Council is requested to review and approve the proposed traffic and pedestrian safety measures at the intersection of Lemon Avenue and Temple City Boulevard and Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue. Public Safety Supervisor Ariizumi gave a summary of the staff report. City Council Minutes November 6, 2018 Page 5 of 7 City Council asked questions regarding the proposed options. Mayor Man opened public comment. Justin Chai, Temple City Youth Committee, spoke in favor of Option 2. Jerry Jambazian, Temple City business owner, commented on additional safety measures for the intersection of Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue. Franklin Ruedel, Temple City resident, commented on pedestrian safety near the schools. Steve Stafford, Temple City resident, made comments regarding stop signs and flashing stop signs. Hearing no further request to speak, Mayor Man closed public comment. City Council commented on the proposed options. Councilmember Chavez made a motion to schedule a public hearing for the removal of the east leg crosswalk at Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue for December 18 and directed staff to bring back a report with Option 2 (i.e., removing the east leg crosswalk at Lemon Avenue and Trelawney Avenue and install a new west leg crosswalk) for Council's consideration. Seconded by Mayor Pro Fish and carried by the following votes: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Council member-Chavez, Sternquist, Fish, Man Councilmember-None Councilmember-None Councilmember-Yu 11. UPDATE FROM CITY MANAGER-None 12. UPDATE FROM CITY ATTORNEY-None 13. COUNCIL REPORTS REGARDING AD HOC OR STANDING COMMITTEE MEETINGS A. SCHOOL DISTRICT/CITY STANDING COMMITTEE (Councilmember Chavez and Mayor Pro Tern Fish)-Formed 1/3/2012 No report. B. LAS TUNAS DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION STANDING COMMITTEE (Councilmember Chavez and Councilmember Yu)-Formed 2/18/2014 No report. City Council Minutes November 6, 2018 Page 6 of? C. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF CITY PROPERTIES STANDING COMMITTEE (Councilmember Yu and Mayor Man)-Formed 2/18/2014 No report. D. AUDIT STANDING COMMITTEE (Councilmember Chavez and Councilmember Yu)-Formed 7/15/2014 No report. E. FACILITIES, PUBLIC WORKS, AND INFRASTRUCTURE STANDING COMMITTEE (Councilmember Yu and Mayor Man)-Formed 4/4/2017 No report. F. LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION AD HOC COMMITTEE (Mayor ProTem Fish and Councilmember Sternquist)-Formed 4/4/2017 No report. G. CITY FEE AD HOC COMMITTEE (Councilrnember Chavez and Councilmernber Sternquist)-Form 6/19/2018 No report. 14. COUNCIL ITEMS SEPARATE FROM THE CITY MANAGER'S REGULAR AGENDA A. COUNCILMEMBER YU-Absent B. COUNCILMEMBER CHAVEZ-Reported on the Youth Committee's tour of the Union Station and visitation with Metro representatives and invited the public to donate books to the Temple City Park Little Free Library. C. COUNCILMEMBER STERNQUIST-commented on Measure M and the Metro's grant awarded to the City for the enhancement of the Eaton Wash. She also shared recent outside agency/organization events and meetings she attended. D. MAYOR PROTEM FISH-commented on the grand opening for Cathay Bank and welcomed them to the business community. E. MAYOR MAN -commented on the Relay for Life, Halloween Carnival, upcoming Veteran's Day Celebration and Congresswomen Judy Chu's emergency preparedness workshop at Live Oak Park. City Council Minutes November 6, 2018 Page 7 of 7 15. REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES TO CITY OFFICIALS FOR CONDUCT OF CITY BUSINESS AND FOR CITY PAYMENT OF CONFERENCE EXPENDITURES -None 16. RECESS TO SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMPLE CITY COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING At 9:11 p.m., the City Council recessed to the Successor Agency Meeting. Minutes of the Successor Agency Meeting are set forth in full in the Successor Agency's records. RECONVENE AS CITY COUNCIL The City Council meeting was reconvened at 9:11 p.m. 17. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA -none 18. ADJOURNMENT The City Council Regular Meeting adjourned in memory of Brian Soumakian at 9:12 p.m. William Man, Mayor ATTEST: Peggy Kuo, City Clerk ATTACHMENT E CITY OF TEMPLE CITY PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION 9701 Las Tunas Dr., Temple City, CA91780 REMOVAL OF EAST LEG CROSSWALK ON LEMON AVENUE AT TRELAWNEY AVENUE Pursuant to California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 21950.5, notice is hereby given that the existing east leg crosswalk located on Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue is proposed to be removed. The crosswalk will be replaced with a new crosswalk located on the west leg of Lemon Avenue at Trelawney Avenue All interested persons are invited to provide input on the proposed crosswalk removal at the Temple City City Council meeting: TEMPLE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5938 KAUFFMAN AVENUE TEMPLE CITY, CA 91780 DECEMBER 18,.2018 at 7:30P.M. REASON FOR REMOVAL: The existing east leg crosswalk will be removed to install a new crosswalk in the west leg to better accommodate the large number of students using the crosswalk coming from the west side of Trelawney Avenue. There is a larger landing pad area and sidewalks leading up to the ramp. The new crosswalk will also reduce the number of vehicle movements crossing over the crosswalk, thereby reducing the conflict with pedestrians in the crosswalk. For questions, please contact Public Safety Supervisor Bryan Ariizumi at (626) 285-2171, ext. 4342 or by email at bariizumi@templecity.us DATE NOTICE POSTED: NOVEMBER 7, 2018