Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutPRR 16-2356Renee Basel From: Chris O'Hare <chrisoharegulfstream@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 8:13 PM To: Bill Thrasher; Rita Taylor; Renee Basel; Trey Nazzaro Subject: Public Record Request - spoliation letter 6-21-12 Dear Custodian of Records, I request to inspect certain public records* in the custody of the Town of Gulf Stream Florida.** The records I want to inspect is any letter that was delivered by Federal Express to the Town dated June 21, 2012; the subject of which is regarding: O'Hare adv. Town of Gulf Stream et al/ Demand for Preservation of Information. While I am not statutorily obligated to explain why I want to inspect these records, I tell you it is for the purpose of informing myself of the historic and current workings of the Town of Gulf Stream and its associated entities, vendors, consultants, advisers, contractors and agents. The records I wish to inspect may also be material to current, anticipated or presently unforeseen legal action. The production of any and all responsive records is therefore urgent and must be acted upon in compliance with Florida Statutes and established case law as soon as possible. Before making this public record request, I first searched online and in the public records portion of your agency's website hoping I could locate the public records I seek without having to write you directly. Unfortunately I cannot find the records I wish to inspect. Therefore I am writing you now and requesting you make every effort as required by law to produce these public records without delay. I make this request pursuant to Article 1, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119 of the Florida Statutes. I hereby reserve all rights granted to me under the Florida Constitution and Florida Statutes. I ask that you take the following action: Read this entire request carefully and respond accordingly. If you are not the custodian of the public records described herein please determine who that person is and notify me immediately in order that I may make this request to the appropriate person without delay. • Reference Florida Statutes and appropriate case law when responding to this record request. • Do NOT produce any records other than records responsive to this request. " Identify by name the person or persons responding to this request if that person is not the Custodian of Records for your agency as required by 119.07(1)(b). " Respond to this public record request in a singular manner and do not combine this request with any other public record requests when responding to this request. " Once you have determined that you do or don't have any records in your custody responsive to this request, immediately act to obtain any responsive records that may be in the custody of your contractor(s) or other parties. " Provide only those records for inspection that do not require extensive use of information technologies or extensive staff time or both in excess of 15 minutes. " If records responsive to this request are not presently available but you expect that they will soon be available I request that you produce the records as soon as they are available. I ask you to take note of �119.07(1)(c) Florida Statues and your affirmative obligation to (1) promptly acknowledge receipt of this public records request and (2) make a good faith effort which "includes making reasonable efforts to determine from other officers or employees within the agency whether such a record exists and, if so, the location at which the record can be accessed." I am, therefore, requesting that you notify every individual and entity in possession of records that may be responsive to this public records request, including individuals and entities under contract with your agency, to preserve and produce all responsive records on an immediate basis. If you contend that any of the records I am seeking, or any portion thereof, are exempt from inspection or disclosure please cite the specific exemption as required by �119.07(1)(e) of the Florida Statutes and state in writing and with particularity the basis for your conclusions as required by �119.07(1)(f) of the Florida Statutes. Produce for my inspection all responsive records and ONLY redact that portion of the record that you consider exempt. To be clear, if you consider an entire record to be exempt, produce that record in its entirety with all portions redacted that you consider exempt. I specifically ask you to do this in order that I may inspect fully redacted records for the purpose of challenging a particular redaction or establishing a reference for a future request of a record that is only temporarily exempt, as in the case of a public record that was prepared by an agency attorney exclusively for litigation and is only exempt from disclosure until the conclusion of the litigation. If the public records being sought are maintained by your agency or contactors for your agency, in an electronic format please produce the records in the original electronic format in which they were created or received. See �119.01(2)(f), Florida Statutes. Again I ask that you provide only those records for inspection that do not require extensive use of information technologies or extensive staff time or both in excess of 15 minutes. Take note of �119.07(4)(a)3.(d) Florida Statues and if you anticipate that any records exist, the production for inspection of which will require extensive use of information technologies or extensive staff time or both in excess of 15 minutes, then please provide those records that can be produced within the first 15 minutes and advise me of the cost you anticipate to be incurred by your agency for the remaining records prior to incurring this cost. Please do not incur any costs on my behalf without first obtaining my written authorization to proceed. If you produce only a portion of all existing responsive records, please tell me that your response includes only a portion of all existing records responsive to this request. If you anticipate the need to incur any costs that I would be statutorily required to pay in order to inspect these public records which would exceed $1.00 please notify me in advance of your incurring that cost with a written estimate of the total cost. Please be sure to itemize any estimates so as to indicate the total number of pages and/or records, as well as to distinguish the cost of labor and materials. Again, please do not incur any costs on my behalf without first obtaining my written authorization to proceed. A record that does not exist because of its disposition requires the creation of a disposition record. In all instances where you determine a record does not exist please determine if the record once existed and in its replacement provide the disposition record for my inspection. *The term public records, as used herein, has the same meaning and scope as the definition of Public records adopted by the Florida Legislature as Statutes Chapter 119. **The phrase Town of Gulf Stream when used herein refers to the Town in its entirety and all entities of the Town including all employees, appointees, officials, assignees, counsel and consultants including Town Manager, Town Clerk, Town Police Chief, Town Commissioners, Town Mayor, Town Departments, Town Police Officers, Town Employees, Town Staff Attorney, Town Engineer, the law firm (Jones Foster Johnston & Stubbs P.A.) that claims to be the Town Attorney including all attorney, partner and employee members of that firm; the Town Counsel of Sweetapple, Broeker & Varkus including all attorney, partner and employee members of that firm, the Town Counsel of Richman Greer, P.A. including all attorney, partner and employee members of that firm and any other entity associated with the Town and subject to public records law. If you do not understand any part of this request or if you need clarification about this request, notify me as soon as possible so I may further describe or clarify this request. All responses to this public records request should be made in writing to the following email address: chrisoharegulfstream@gmail.com TOWN OF GULF STREAM PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Delivered via e-mail October 24, 2016 Chris O'Hare [mail to: chrisoharegulfstreamna gmail.com] Re: GS #2356 (spoliation letter 6-21-12) I request to inspect certain public records* in the custody of the Town of Gulf Stream Florida.** The records I want to inspect is any letter that was delivered by Federal Express to the Town dated June 21, 2012; the subject of which is regarding: O'Hare adv. Town of Gulf Stream et al/Demand for preservation of Information. Dear Chris O'Hare [mail to: chrisoharegulfstream(a)gmail.coml: The Town of Gulf Stream has received your public records requests dated October 20, 2016. The original public records requests can be found at the following links: h"://www2.gulf-stream.org/weblink/O/doc/I 03206/Pagel.asnx Please be advised that the Town of Gulf Stream is currently working on a large number of incoming public records requests. The Town will use its very best efforts to respond to you in a reasonable amount of time with the appropriate response or an estimated cost to respond. Sincerely, R%ld Jz"441 $true As requested by Rita Taylor Town Clerk, Custodian of the Records TOWN OF GULF STREAM PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Delivered via e-mail November 15, 2016 Chris O'Hare [mail to: chrisoharegulfstreamegmail.coml Re: GS #2356 (spoliation letter 6-21-12) 1 request to inspect certain public records* in the custody of the Town of Gulf Stream Florida. ** The records I want to inspect is any letter that was delivered by Federal Express to the Town dated June 21, 2012; the subject of which is regarding: O'Hare adv. Town of Gulf Stream et al/ Demand for preservation oflnformation. Dear Chris O'Hare [mail to: chrisoharegulfstreamaa,gmail.coml: The Town of Gulf Stream has received your public records request dated October 20, 2016. Your original public records request and response can be found at the following link: httv://www2.gulf-stream.org/weblink/O/doe/I 03197/Pagel.aspxx We have also attached the response for your convenience. We consider this request closed. Sincerely, 1zSiD" R4 -W" $wizl' As requested by Rita Taylor Town Clerk, Custodian of the Records 102 NE SNvnd Street, Suite 179 tkwa Raton, Florida 33432 tel 561.3639900 fat 561.368&199 June 21. 2012 Garret Ward. Chief of Police Town of Gulfstream 100 Sea Road Gulfstream, FL 33483 Via Federal Express w•ww•.ca rtcrla wfi nn. u% 405 Overbnook Rozentan, Montana 59715 tel 4W-582.7552 fax •[M W22-0190 Re: O'Hare adv. Town of Gulf Stream et al/ Demand for Preservation of Information Dear Sirs: Please be advised that I represent Mr. and Mrs. Christopher O'Hare with regard to their claims arising from the unlawful conduct of Officer Ginsberg that occurred at 2520 Avenue Au Solcil on: 10/28/11: 12/27/11; 12/28/11; 3/5/12: and 3/20/12 ("Incidents"). Demand is hereby made for you to take all reasonable and necessary action to preserve all documents, tangible things or electronically stored information that has any reference or connection in any way to the above Incidents. For purposes of this request, the term "you" and "vouf' refers to Mr. Thrasher. Officer Ginsburg, Chief Ward and the Town of Gulf Stream generally. It is expected that much of the information within the scope of the demand may be stored on your current and former computer systems and other media and devices. As to electronically stored information ("ESI") this should be afforded die broadest possible definition. Accordingly. ESI includes (by way of example and not as an exclusive list) any potentially relevant information that is electronically, magnetically or optically stored as: • Digital communications (e.g.. e-mail. voice mail, instant messaging); • Word processed documents (e.g.. Word or WordPerfect documents and drafts): • Image and Facsimile Files (e.g...PDF..TIFF. .JPG. .GIF images): • Sound Recordings (e.g., . WAV and .MP3 files): • Video Recordings (e.g., .AVI and .MOV files): • Databases (e.g.. Access, Oracle. SQL Server data. SAP); • Contact and Relationship Management Data (e.g., Outlook. ACT!); • Calendar and Diary Application Data (e.g., Outlook PST. Yahoo, blog tools): • Online Access Data (e.g.. Temporary Internet Files. History, Cookies): Demand for Preservation of Evidence Page 2 of 5 • Network Access and Server Activity Logs; and • Back Up and Archival Files (e.g.. Zip, .GHO) Preservation Requires Immediate Intervention It is essential that you understand that adequate preservation of information requires more than simply refraining from efforts to destroy or dispose of potentially relevant evidence. You must immediately act to intervene in preventing loss due to routine operations and employ proper techniques and protocols suited for the protection of any information that is within the scope of this demand. Be advised dial sources of ESI arc commonly altered and erased by continued use of computers and other electronic devices that contain ESI. Booting a drive, examining its contents or running any application may irretrievably alter the information it contains and may constitute unlawful spoliation of evidence. Consequently, alteration and erasure may result from your failure to act diligently and responsibly to prevent loss or corruption of ESI. This specific reference to ESI should be understood to diminish your concurrent obligation to preserve documents and other tangible things that potentially contain relevant evidence. Suspension of Routine Destruction You are further directed to immediately initiate a litigation "hold" procedure for potentially relevant ESI, documents and tangible things, and to act diligently and in good faith to secure and audit compliance with such litigation "hold" procedure. You are further directed to immediately identify and modify or suspend features of your information systems and devices that, in routine operation, operate to cause the loss of potentially relevant ESI. Examples of such features and operations include: • Purging the contents of e-mail repositories by age. capacity or other criteria; • Using data or media wiping, disposal, erasure or encryption utilities or devices; • Overwriting, erasing, destroying or discarding back up media; • Re -assigning, rc-imaging or disposing of systems, servers, devices or media; • Running antivirus or other programs affecting wholesale metadata alteration; • Releasing or purging online storage repositories; • Using metadata stripper utilities: • Disabling server or IM logging: • Executing drive or file defragmentation or compression programs. Guard Against Deletion You should anticipate that your individuals with access to ESI and other information may seek to hide, destroy or alter it. You are directed to take action to prevent or guard against such actions. Especially where government machines have been used for Internet access or personal communications, you should anticipate that users may seek to delete or destroy information they regard as personal, confidential or embarrassing and, in so doing, may also delete or destroy Demand for Preservation of Evidence Page 3 of 5 potentially relevant ESI. This concern is not one unique to die Town of Gulf Stream or its employees and officers. It's simply an event that occurs with such regularity in electronic discovery efforts that any custodian of ESI and their counsel are obliged to anticipate and guard against its occurrence. Preservation by Imaging You arc also directed to take affirmative steps to prevent anyone with access to data, systems and archives from seeking to modify, destroy or hide electronic evidence on network or local hard drives (such as by deleting or overwriting Files, using data shredding and overwriting applications, defmgmentation. re-imaging or replacing drives, encryption, compression, steganography or the like). With respect to local hard drives, one way to protect existing data on local hard drives is by the creation and authentication of a forensically qualified image of all sectors of die drive. Such a forensically qualified duplicate may also be called a bit stream image or clone of the drive. Be advised that a conventional back up of a hard drive is not a forensically qualified image because it only captures active, unlocked data files and fails to preserve forensically significant data that may exist in such areas as unallocated space, slack space and the swap file. With respect to the hard drives and storage devices of the individuals named herein as well as any other person likely to have information pertaining to any of the above instances, demand is made for you to immediately obtain. authenticate and preserve forensically qualified images of the hard drives in any such computer system (including portable and home computers) used by that person from August 29. 2011 through the date of this demand. Demand is further made for you to record and preserve the system time and date of each such computer. Once obtained, each such forensically qualified image should be labeled to identify the date of acquisition, the person or entity acquiring the image and the system and medium from which it was obtained. Each such image should be preserved without alteration. Preservation in Native Form You should anticipate that certain ESI will be sought in die form or Forms in which it is ordinarily maintained. Accordingly, you should preserve ESI in such native forms, and you should not select methods to preserve ESI that remove or degrade the ability to search your ESI by electronic meats or make it difficult or burdensome to access or use the information efficiently in the litigation. You should additionally refrain from actions that shift ESI from reasonably accessible media and forms to less accessible media and forms if the effect of such actions is to make such ESI not reasonably accessible. Metadata You should further anticipate the need to disclose and produce system and application metadata and act to preserve it. System meladata is information describing the history and characteristics of other ESL This information is typically associated with tracking or managing an electronic file and often includes data reflecting a file's name, size, custodian, location and dates of creation and last modification or access. Application metadata is information automatically included or embedded in electronic files but which may not be apparent to a user, including deleted content, Demand for Preservation of Evidence Page 4 of 5 draft language, commentary, collaboration and distribution data and dates of creation and printing. Be advised that metadata may be overwritten or corrupted by careless handling or improper steps to preserve ESL For electronic mail, metadata includes all header routing data and Base 64 encoded attachment data. in addition to the: To, From. Subject, Received Date, CC and BCC Gelds. Servers With respect to servers like those used to manage electronic mail (e.g., Microsoft Exchange, Lotus Domino) or network storage (often called a user's "network share"), die complete contents of each user's network share and e-mail account should be preserved. There are several ways to preserve the contents of a server depending upon. e.g., its RAID configuration and whether it can be downed or must be online 34/7. Home Systems, Laptops, Online Accounts and Other ESI Venues It is expected that you will act swiftly to preserve data on office workstations and servers and immediately determine if any home or portable systems contain potentially relevant data. To the extent that persons may have sent or received potentially relevant e-mails or created or reviewed potentially relevant documents away from the office, you must preserve the contents of systems, devices and media used for these purposes (including not only potentially relevant data from portable and home computers. but also from portable thumb drives. CD -R disks and the user's PDA, smart phone, voice mailbox or other forms of ESI storage). Similarly, the contents of browser -based email accounts or services (such as AOL, Gmail, Yahoo Mail or the like) used to send or receive potentially relevant messages and attachments, should be preserved. Ancillary Preservation You must preserve documents and other tangible items that may be required to access, interpret or search potentially relevant ESI, such as logs. naming protocols, file lists, data entry forms, abbreviation keys, user ID and passwords. You must also preserve any cabling, drivers and hardware that may be needed to access or interpret media on which ESI is stored. This includes tape drives, bar code readers, Zip drives and other legacy or proprietary devices. Paper Preservation of ESI is Inadequate As hard copies do not preserve electronic searchability or metadata. they are not an adequate substitute for, or cumulative of, electronically stored versions. If information exists in both electronic and paper forms. you should preserve both forms. Third Parties Your preservation obligation extends beyond ESI in your care, possession or custody and includes ESI in the custody of others that are subject to your direction or control. Accordingly. you must notify any current or former employee, custodian or contractor in possession of potentially relevant ESI to preserve such ESI to the full extent of your obligation to do so, and Demand for Preservation of Evidence Page 5 of 5 you must take reasonable steps to secure their compliance. System Sequestration It is strongly suggested that all ESI systems and hardware used by the above named individuals be removed from service and sequestered. In the event you deem it impractical to sequester systems and devices you should consider creating forensically sound imaging of the systems and devices. As it is reasonable to expect the future aced for forensic examination of one or more of the systems and devices, you should employ forensically sound ESI preservation methods. Failure to use such methods poses a significant threat of spoliation and data loss. "Forensically sound preservation" requires that any duplication of ESI be done only while using tools and methods that make no changes to the evidence and support authentication of die duplicate as a true and complete bit -for -bit image of die original. A forensically sound preservation method guards against changes to mctadata evidence and preserves all parts of die electronic evidence, including in the so-called "unallocated clusters," holding deleted files. Preservation Protocols I am amenable to working with you to agree upon an acceptable protocol for forensically sound preservation of media to be preserved. It should be understood that a successful and compliant ESI preservation effort will require technical expertise. You are urged to engage the services of an expert in electronic evidence and computer forensics. Do Not Delay Preservation It is essential that you immediately under take preservation efforts. Should you fail to preserve potentially relevant evidence and this results in the corruption, loss or delay in production of evidence to which we will be entitled in a future lawsuit, such failure will be deemed to constitute Spoliation of Evidence. Confirmalion of Compliance Please confirm by July 3. 201.2 that you have taken the steps outlined in this demand to preserve all information in your possession, custody or control that exists in connection with the Incidents. If you have do not undertake the steps outlined above please describe what you have done to ensure dint adequate preservation takes place. Thank you very much. R c[Fully, John E. Carter, Ecq. Cc: John Randolph. Esq.