Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutPRR 16-2401Renee Basel From: Chris O'Hare <chrisoharegulfstream@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2016 9:26 AM To: Bill Thrasher; Rita Taylor; Renee Basel; mminor@udkstudios.com Subject: Public Record Request - open front lawn review of 960 Indigo Point Dear Custodian of Records, I request to inspect certain public records in the custody of the Town of Gulf Stream or in the custody of its agents or associated entities. While I am not statutorily obligated to explain why I want to inspect these records, I tell you my inspection of these records may be essential to my ability to make informed comments in an upcoming public hearing. The records I wish to inspect may also be material to current, anticipated or presently unforeseen legal action. The production of any and all responsive records is therefore urgent and must be acted upon in compliance with Florida Statutes and established case law as soon as possible. Before making this public record request, I first searched online and in the public records portion of your agency's website hoping I could locate the public records I seek without having to write you directly. Unfortunately I cannot find the records I wish to inspect. Therefore I am writing you now and requesting you make every effort as required by law to produce these public records without delay. The public records I request to inspect may be in the custody of an entity currently or previously associated with, or under contract with, your agency. As a courtesy to you and that entity, and to assist in expediting my access to inspect records responsive to this request I am notifying this entity of this request by copy of this email. I am NOT requesting this entity produce responsive records directly to me. Rather I am alerting them to my request to you so that they may prepare to assist you, if they choose to, in producing responsive records. Do not assume my act of copying this entity with this request relieves you of any of your duties under Florida Statute. I ask that you contact this entity yourself in order to obtain all Public records responsive to this request if those records are not all in your custody. I make this request pursuant to Article 1, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119 of the Florida Statutes. I hereby reserve all rights granted to me under the Florida Constitution and Florida Statutes. I ask that you take the following action: • Read this entire request carefully and respond accordingly. • If you are not the custodian of the public records described herein please determine who that person is and notify me immediately in order that I may make this request to the appropriate person without delay. • Reference Florida Statutes and appropriate case law when responding to this record request. • Do NOT produce any records other than records responsive to this request. • Identify by name the person or persons responding to this request if that person is not the Custodian of Records for your agency as required by 119.07(1)(b). • Respond to this public record request in a singular manner and do not combine this request with any other public record requests when responding to this request. • Once you have determined that you do or don't have any records in your custody responsive to this request, immediately act to obtain any responsive records that may be in the custody of your contractor(s) or other parties. • Provide only those records for inspection that do not require extensive use of information technologies or extensive staff time or both in excess of 15 minutes. • If records responsive to this request are not presently available but you expect that they will soon be available I request that you produce the records as soon as they are available. I ask you to take note of §119.07(1)(c) Florida Statues and your affirmative obligation to (1) promptly acknowledge receipt of this public records request and (2) make a good faith effort which "includes making reasonable efforts to determine from other officers or employees within the agency whether such a record exists and, if so, the location at which the record can be accessed." I am, therefore, requesting that you notify every individual and entity in possession of records that may be responsive to this public records request, including individuals and entities under contract with your agency, to preserve and produce all responsive records on an immediate basis. If you contend that any of the records I am seeking, or any portion thereof, are exempt from inspection or disclosure please cite the specific exemption as required by §119.07(1)(e) of the Florida Statutes and state in writing and with particularity the basis for your conclusions as required by §119.07(1)(f) of the Florida Statutes. Produce for my inspection all responsive records and ONLY redact that portion of the record that you consider exempt. To be clear, if you consider an entire record to be exempt, produce that record in its entirety with all portions redacted that you consider exempt. I specifically ask you to do this in order that I may inspect fully redacted records for the purpose of challenging a particular redaction or establishing a reference for a future request of a record that is only temporarily exempt, as in the case of a public record that was prepared by an agency attorney exclusively for litigation and is only exempt from disclosure until the conclusion of the litigation. If the public records being sought are maintained by your agency or contactors for your agency, in an electronic format please produce the records in the original electronic format in which they were created or received. See §119.01(2)(f), Florida Statutes. Again I ask that you provide only those records for inspection that do not require extensive use of information technologies or extensive staff time or both in excess of 15 minutes. Take note of §119.07(4)(a)3.(d) Florida Statues and if you anticipate that any records exist, the production for inspection of which will require extensive use of information technologies or extensive staff time or both in excess of 15 minutes, then please provide those records that can be produced within the first 15 minutes and advise me of the cost you anticipate to be incurred by your agency for the remaining records prior to incurring this cost. Please do not incur any costs on my behalf without first obtaining my written authorization to proceed. If you produce only a portion of all existing responsive records, please tell me that your response includes only a portion of all existing records responsive to this request. If you anticipate the need to incur any costs that I would be statutorily required to pay in order to inspect these public records which would exceed $1.00 please notify me in advance of your incurring that cost with a written estimate of the total cost. Please be sure to itemize any estimates so as to indicate the total number of pages and/or records, as well as to distinguish the cost of labor and materials. Again, please do not incur any costs on my behalf without first obtaining my written authorization to proceed. A record that does not exist because of its disposition requires the creation of a disposition record. In all instances where you determine a record does not exist please determine if the record once existed and in its replacement provide the disposition record for my inspection. As background to this request I call your attention to Town Ord. 15/4 regulating "Open Front Lawns" in Place Au Soleil. I request to inspect any public record* in the custody of the Town of Gulf Stream** regarding commenting on, communicating about, considering, or reviewing the proposed landscape portion of the most recent Application for Architectural/Site Plan Review of 960 Indigo Point in regard to the proposed projects compliance with Town regulations and the regulation referenced above which requires 75% of all plants in the front of a home in Place Au Soleil not to exceed a mature height of three feet. I anticipate that responsive records may include but may not be limited to records submitted by the applicant, records created by Town staff, records created by appointed or elected officials, records created by Town consultants, and/or records created by the Town Attorney. *The term public records, as used herein, has the same meaning and scope as the definition of Public records adopted by the Florida Legislature as Statutes Chapter 119. 3 **The phrase Town of Gulf Stream when used herein refers to the Town in its entirety and all entities of the Town including all employees, appointees, officials, assignees, counsel and consultants including Town Manager, Town Clerk, Town Police Chief, Town Commissioners, Town Mayor, Town Departments, Town Police Officers, Town Employees, Town Staff Attorney, Town Engineer, the law firm (Jones Foster Johnston & Stubbs P.A.) that claims to be the Town Attorney including all attorney, partner and employee members of that firm; the Town Counsel of Sweetapple, Broeker & Varkus including all attorney, partner and employee members of that firm, the Town Counsel of Richman Greer, P.A. including all attorney, partner and employee members of that firm and any other entity associated with the Town and subject to public records law. If you do not understand any part of this request or if you need clarification about this request, notify me as soon as possible so I may further describe or clarify this request. Due to issues of delivery failure and occasional rejection by your server this email is being sent to multiple recipients to insure prompt delivery. All responses to this public records request should be made in writing to the following email address: chrisoharegulfstream@gmail.com TOWN OF GULF STREAM PALM BEACII COUNTY, FLORIDA Delivered via e-mail November 17, 2016 Chris O'Hare [mail to: chrisoharegulfstream(a)pmail.coml Re: GS #2401 (open front lawn review of 960 Indigo Point) I request to inspect any public record* in the custody of the Town of GufStream** regarding commenting on, communicating about, considering, or reviewing the proposed landscape portion of the most recent Application for Architectural/Site Plan Review of 960 Indigo Point in regard to the proposed projects compliance with Town regulations and the regulation referenced above which requires 75% of all plants in the front of a home in Place Au Soleil not to exceed a mature height of three feet. I anticipate that responsive records may include but may not be limited to records submitted by the applicant, records created by Town staff, records created by appointed or elected officials, records created by Town consultants, and/or records created by the Town Attorney. Dear Chris O'Hare [mail to: chrisohareeulfstream(7a.gnail.coml: The Town of Gulf Stream has received your public records request dated November 12, 2016. The original public records request can be found at the following link: http://www2.gulf-stream.org/weblink/O/doc/103528/Pagel.ast)x Please be advised that the Town of Gulf Stream is currently working on a large number of incoming public records requests. The Town will use its very best efforts to respond to you in a reasonable amount of time with the appropriate response or an estimated cost to respond. Sincerely, D�"�"� Rf4,d r� WM, paga[. As requested by Rita Taylor Town Clerk, Custodian of the Records TOWN OF GULF STREAM PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA January 6, 2017 Chris O'Hare [mail to: chrisoharegulfstreamRgmail.coml Re: GS #2401 (open front lawn review of 960 Indigo Point) I request to inspect any public record* in the custody of the Town of Gulf Stream ** regarding commenting on, communicating about, considering, or reviewing the proposed landscape portion of the most recent Application for Architectatral/Site Plan Review of 960 Indigo Point in regard to the proposed projects compliance with Town regulations and the regulation referenced above which requires 75% of all plants in the front of a home in Place Air Soleil not to exceed a mature height of three feet. I anticipate that responsive records may include but may not be limited to records submitted by the applicant, records created by Town staff, records created by appointed or elected officials, records created by Town consultants, and/or records created by the Town Attorney. Dear Chris O'Hare [mail to: chrisoharegulfstream(i4gmail.coml: The Town of Gulf Stream has received your public records requests dated November 12, 2016. You should be able to view your original request and response at the following link: http://www2.gulf-stream.org/weblink/O/doc/I03528/PagcI.asl)x You have asked that the Town only provide those records that do not require extensive use of information technologies or extensive staff time or both in excess of 15 minutes and that the Town provide an estimate of the cost that would be required to fulfill the request as permitted by the Public Records Act. To that end, the Town has spent at least 15 minutes on your request and is providing you with a response to your request of "any public record" at the same link above. We consider this request closed. Sincerely, As requested by Rita Taylor Town Clerk, Custodian of the Records Renee Basel From: Marty Minor <MMinor@udkstudios.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 2:43 PM To: Bill Thrasher, Rita Taylor Subject: FW: Public Record Request - open front lawn review of 960 Indigo Point Attachments: 960 Indigo Point Review memorandum.pdf; 960 Indigo Point Review memorandum2 081415.pdf Bill, We did not review the landscape plan for 960 Indigo Point and have no correspondence regarding the landscape plan. We did briefly reference landscaping in the two memorandum I did provide to the Town regarding the proposed site plan and architectural elevations. Those two memorandums are attached for your information. Thank you, marty Marty R.A. Minor, AICP urban MMinor@udkstudios.com sruoios 610 Clematis Street Suite CU02 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 P.561.366.1100 x.148 [ F.561.366.1111 o...w rt..r v q, From: Chris O'Hare [mailto:chrisoharegulfstream@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2016 9:26 AM To: bthrasher@gulf-stream.org; RTaylor@gulf-stream.org; rbasel@gulf-stream.org; Marty Minor <MMinor@udkstudios.com> Subject: Public Record Request - open front lawn review of 960 Indigo Point Dear Custodian of Records, I request to inspect certain public records in the custody of the Town of Gulf Stream or in the custody of its agents or associated entities. While I am not statutorily obligated to explain why I want to inspect these records, I tell you my inspection of these records may be essential to my ability to make informed comments in an upcoming public hearing. The records I wish to inspect may also be material to current, anticipated or presently unforeseen legal action. The production of any and all responsive records is therefore urgent and must be acted upon in compliance with Florida Statutes and established case law as soon as possible. Before making this public record request, I first searched online and in the public records portion of your agency's website hoping I could locate the public records I seek without having to write you directly. Unfortunately I cannot find the records I wish to inspect. Therefore I am writing you now and requesting you make every effort as required by law to produce these public records without delay. The public records I request to inspect may be in the custody of an entity currently or previously associated with, or under contract with, your agency. As a courtesy to you and that entity, and to assist in expediting my access to inspect records responsive to this request I am notifying this entity of this request by copy of this email. I am NOT requesting this entity produce responsive records directly to me. Rather I am alerting them to my request to you so that they may prepare to assist you, if they choose to, in producing responsive records. Do not assume my act of copying this entity with this request relieves you of any of your duties under Florida Statute. I ask that you contact this entity yourself in order to obtain all Public records responsive to this request if those records are not all in your custody. I make this request pursuant to Article 1, Section 24 of the Florida Constitution and Chapter 119 of the Florida Statutes. I hereby reserve all rights granted to me under the Florida Constitution and Florida Statutes. I ask that you take the following action: • Read this entire request carefully and respond accordingly. • If you are not the custodian of the public records described herein please determine who that person is and notify me immediately in order that I may make this request to the appropriate person without delay. • Reference Florida Statutes and appropriate case law when responding to this record request. • Do NOT produce any records other than records responsive to this request. • Identify by name the person or persons responding to this request if that person is not the Custodian of Records for your agency as required by 119.07(1)(b). • Respond to this public record request in a singular manner and do not combine this request with any other public record requests when responding to this request. • Once you have determined that you do or don't have any records in your custody responsive to this request, immediately act to obtain any responsive records that may be in the custody of your contractor(s) or other parties. • Provide only those records for inspection that do not require extensive use of information technologies or extensive staff time or both in excess of 15 minutes. • If records responsive to this request are not presently available but you expect that they will soon be available I request that you produce the records as soon as they are available. I ask you to take note of §119.07(1)(c) Florida Statues and your affirmative obligation to (1) promptly acknowledge receipt of this public records request and (2) make a good faith effort which "includes making reasonable efforts to determine from other officers or employees within the agency whether such a record exists and, if so, the location at which the record can be accessed." I am, therefore, requesting that you notify every individual and entity in possession of records that may be responsive to this public records request, including individuals and entities under contract with your agency, to preserve and produce all responsive records on an immediate basis. If you contend that any of the records I am seeking, or any portion thereof, are exempt from inspection or disclosure please cite the specific exemption as required by §119.07(1)(e) of the Florida Statutes and state in writing and with particularity the basis for your conclusions as required by §119.07(1)(f) of the Florida Statutes. Produce for my inspection all responsive records and ONLY redact that portion of the record that you consider exempt. To be clear, if you consider an entire record to be exempt, produce that record in its entirety with all portions redacted that you consider exempt. I specifically ask you to do this in order that I may inspect fully redacted records for the purpose of challenging a particular redaction or establishing a reference for a future request of a record that is only temporarily exempt, as in the case of a public record that was prepared by an agency attorney exclusively for litigation and is only exempt from disclosure until the conclusion of the litigation. If the public records being sought are maintained by your agency or contactors for your agency, in an electronic format please produce the records in the original electronic format in which they were created or received. See §119.01(2)(f), Florida Statutes. Again I ask that you provide only those records for inspection that do not require extensive use of information technologies or extensive staff time or both in excess of 15 minutes. Take note of §119.07(4)(a)3.(d) Florida Statues and if you anticipate that any records exist, the production for inspection of which will require extensive use of information technologies or extensive staff time or both in excess of 15 minutes, then please provide those records that can be produced within the first 15 minutes and advise me of the cost you anticipate to be incurred by your agency for the remaining records prior to incurring this cost. Please do not incur any costs on my behalf without first obtaining my written authorization to proceed. If you produce only a portion of all existing responsive records, please tell me that your response includes only a portion of all existing records responsive to this request. If you anticipate the need to incur any costs that I would be statutorily required to pay in order to inspect these public records which would exceed $1.00 please notify me in advance of your incurring that cost with a written estimate of the total cost. Please be sure to itemize any estimates so as to indicate the total number of pages and/or records, as well as to distinguish the cost of labor and materials. Again, please do not incur any costs on my behalf without first obtaining my written authorization to proceed. A record that does not exist because of its disposition requires the creation of a disposition record. In all instances where you determine a record does not exist please determine if the record once existed and in its replacement provide the disposition record for my inspection. As background to this request I call your attention to Town Ord. 15/4 regulating "Open Front Lawns" in Place Au Soleil. I request to inspect any public record* in the custody of the Town of Gulf Stream** regarding commenting on, communicating about, considering, or reviewing the proposed landscape portion of the most recent Application for Architectural/Site Plan Review of 960 Indigo Point in regard to the proposed projects compliance with Town regulations and the regulation referenced above which requires 75% of all plants in the front of a home in Place Au Soleil not to exceed a mature height of three feet. 1 anticipate that responsive records may include but may not be limited to records submitted by the applicant, records created by Town staff, records created by appointed or elected officials, records created by Town consultants, and/or records created by the Town Attorney. *The term public records, as used herein, has the same meaning and scope as the definition of Public records adopted by the Florida Legislature as Statutes Chapter 119. **The phrase Town of Gulf Stream when used herein refers to the Town in its entirety and all entities of the Town including all employees, appointees, officials, assignees, counsel and consultants including Town Manager, Town Clerk, Town Police Chief, Town Commissioners, Town Mayor, Town Departments, Town Police Officers, Town Employees, Town Staff Attorney, Town Engineer, the law firm (Jones Foster Johnston & Stubbs P.A.) that claims to be the Town Attorney including all attorney, partner and employee members of that firm; the Town Counsel of Sweetapple, Broeker & Varkus including all attorney, partner and employee members of that firm, the Town Counsel of Richman Greer, P.A. including all attorney, partner and employee members of that firm and any other entity associated with the Town and subject to public records law. If you do not understand any part of this request or if you need clarification about this request, notify me as soon as possible so I may further describe or clarify this request. Due to issues of delivery failure and occasional rejection by your server this email is being sent to multiple recipients to insure prompt delivery. All responses to this public records request should be made in writing to the following email address: chrisoharegulfstream@gmail.com Renee Basel From: Marty Minor <MMinor@udkstudios.com> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 2:42 PM To: Bill Thrasher Subject: Herzog Residence Attachments: 960 Indigo Point Review memorandum2 081415.pdf Bill, I have updated the review memorandum for the Herzog Residence at 960 Indigo Point. The house meets the code standards, except for the entry feature. The alternative entry feature identified on the plans meet the code standards through the provision of a discouraged height. Please review and please let me know if you have any questions, revisions, corrections or comments. Thank you, marty Marty R.A. Minor, AICP Urban Design Kilday Studios 610 Clematis Street Suite CU -02 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561)366-1100 MEMORANDUM TO: William Thrasher Town Manager FROM: Marty R.A. Minor, AICP DATE: August 14, 2015 RE: 960 INDIGO POINT REVIEW MEMORANDUM n STUDIO Urban Planning and Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics The following is an analysis of the proposed demolition of an existing house and the construction of the new house at 960 Indigo Point. Request The applicant is seeking Level 3 Architectural Site Plan Approval for a 7,186 -square foot, Anglo Caribbean home on 21,719 square feet (0.498 acres) within Place Au Soleil. According to Palm Beach County Property Appraiser records, the existing home is 4,716 -square foot in size and was constructed in 1965. Land Use & Zoning EXISTING USE, ZONING AND LAND USE DESIGNATIONS EXISTING USE ZONING FUTURE LAND USE Subject Site RS -Place Au Soleil SF (Single Family) 960 Indigo Point North RS -Place Au Soleil SF (Single Family) Single Family Home (955 Indigo Point) East OR- Outdoor Recreational REC (Recreation) Intracoastal Waterway and Gulf Stream Golf Course South RS -Place Au Soleil SF (Single Family) Canal and Single Family Home (955 Emerald Row) West RS -Place Au Soleil SF (Single Family) Single Family Home (940 Indigo Point) 610 Clematis Street Suite CU02 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 561.366.1111 fax www.udkstudios.com LCC000035 Project Details The following is an analysis on how the proposed house addresses the Town's development standards. 960 Indigo Point Town Regulation Proposed Plan Consistent? Floor Area Ratio 0.33 for first 20,000 7,186 square feet Yes square feet of lot + 0.20 for portion of lot over 20,000 square feet = 6,944 square feet of house allowed + a maximum of 300 square feet of special exception coverage. Total area allowed 7,244 square feet Building Height 30 feet 29 feet Yes Maximum Stories 2 stories 2 stories Yes Lot Size 15,000 square feet 21,719 square feet Yes Lot Width 40 feet — pie- 55 feet Yes shaped lot Maximum Second .70 of first floor 2,668 (61%) square Yes Floor Area area feet 4,395 square feet of first floor area = 3,076 square feet allowed on second floor Setbacks Front 30 feet 66 feet Yes Side Total of both side North setback -15 Yes setbacks shall be a feet minimum of 30% of South Setback -18 the lot width; feet, 7 inches however, no single Total Side Setbacks side setback shall be — 33 feet, 7 inches less than 15 feet. Totalsetbacks required: 33 feet, 7 inches Rear 30 feet 30 feet Yes Parking 2 spaces in garage, 3 spaces in garage, Yes 2 spaces outside 3 spaces outside Access Access to the lot will be through Indigo Point, which is a two-lane local street within the Place Au Soleil neighborhood. Floor Area Ratio Per Section 70-71 of the Town Code sets the maximum size for a single family home through the established Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for the subject lot. As indicated in the table above, the maximum size of the home for the 21,719 square foot lot is 7,244 square feet. The applicant is proposing a house area of 7,186. This area 5,832 square feet of living area, 591 square feet of covered outside area and 763 square feet for the three -car garage. Architecture The proposed home is identified as having an Anglo Caribbean architectural style, which is a preferred architectural style within the Place Au Soleil district. The Town Code does not provide a description or characteristics of the Anglo Caribbean style. However, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) does provide a good description of the Anglo Caribbean style, which is attached for your review and information. The proposed home contains many of the features of the Anglo Caribbean architectural style as described in the attachment. "Discouraged" elements Section 70-4 of the Town Code states that the use of more than three "discouraged" elements on a property is prohibited. The applicant is proposing to use three "discouraged" items within the house design. These items are: • The proposed eave heights exceed the "Preferred" eave heights (8' to 10'6" for one-story and 21 feet or less for two-story portions) found in the Town Code. The proposed first floor eave heights of 12' 6" for one-story and 23 feet for two-story portions fall under the "Discouraged" category. • The proposed entry feature for the home, the applicant has provided a covered entry employing columns and a hip roof. The height of the entry feature (labeled as "Alt. Front Elevation" on the submitted plans), as measured from the finished floor elevation to the top of the feature, is 12' 6", which falls under the "Discouraged" category. Please note that another Front Elevation has been provided, which indicates an entry feature which includes columns and a balcony. The proposed balcony alternative exceeds the height limit for entry features. As you are aware, Section 70-100 (a)(4) states: "Entry features are the front portion of the structure which provide door entrance to the dwelling. The height of the entry feature is measured from the finish floor elevation to the upper portion of any balcony railings, Dutch gable or other such elements. Entry features, if used, should provide a sense of arrival, yet should not overpower them or the remainder of the structure. The scale and proportion of entry features should be consistent with the rest of the structure, varying just enough to provide a focal point to the front of the house. As prescribed by the referenced code section, the entry feature has been measured from the finished floor area to the top of the balcony railing. This distance is 15'6", which is listed as a prohibit height for eaves and entry features. Section 70-101 (c)(4) states, that "between 25 percent and 50 percent of total window opening area on an elevation composed of undivided panes larger than eight square feet" is "Discouraged." The rear elevation, facing the Intracoastal waterway, for the master bedroom and family room feature windows exceed eight square feet. Recommendation The proposed new construction of a 7,186 -square foot at 960 Indigo Point is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Town Code if the "Alt. Front Elevation" for the entry feature is used. As such, we can recommend approval of the subject application only with the specific approval of the "Alt. Front Elevation." " ANGLO  CARIBBEAN General Characteristics " Roofs of the Anglo -Caribbean house are made of wood or aspbalt shingles, metal, or slate. Roofs slopes are between 4:12 and 8:12 and are typically hip roofs. " Roof overhangs we typically quite deep with exposed rifler tads and thin eaves. Often the overhang will kick out from the beam at a shallower roof slope to give the appearance of a canted roof. This allows for a steeper roof slope and a deeper overhang without coveting too much of the elevation with roof. Brackets can be used at the ovahang but are not used as extensively as with the Florida Btmgalowhouse. " The Anglo -Caribbean house is a hybrid of Wood Vernacular and Spanish or Medilerraoean detailing and materials. Masonry or stone is used on the ground floor while wood framing and siding are used on the second floor. The facade compositions are typically symmetrical with long covered balconies and porches. Ground level masonry columns or piers support second level wooden posts. " Exterior finishes are almost exclusively lower level stucco and upper level siding. Colors tend to be subtle with an emphasis on natural materials and earth tones. Thcre is the extensive use of balconies supported by brackets, two story porches, louvered openings and shutters. Detailing and tnnaim enation is very simple and tectonic in its usage. " Windows and doors are of vertical and/or square proportions. Openings for doors and windows are deep and cast deep shadows as well as give the impression of thickness and solidity. Windows can have divided lights, single lights, and may borrow light configuration from the Florida Bungalow or Craftsman languages. Windows are most commonly double -hung or casement. Window and door surrounds, when they exist, are made of stucco, stone, or wood. " The front porch is a common element and typically supports a second story balcony and is thereby under the primary roof. Loggias, like in the Mediterranean Revival, can be found on either the first or second story. Porches are augmented by bracketed second floor balconies. " Columns, posts, wooden and masonry balustrades, and brackets are all very common elements within this language. Colurmss are either smooth and round, or can be detailed as squared masony piers. The most prominent feature of the Anglo -Caribbean house is the clear distinction between the fast and second floors; between the massive and the delicate, between masonry and wood. 14 Renee Basel From: Marty Minor <MMinor@udkstudios.com> Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2015 10:28 AM To: Bill Thrasher Subject: RE: Herzog residence Attachments: 960 Indigo Point Review memorandum.pdf Bill, Attached for your review is my draft report on the Herzog residence. Please review and please let me know if you have any questions, concerns, revisions or corrections. Thank you, marty From: Bill Thrasher [mailto:bthrasher@gulf-stream.org] Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 7:35 AM To: Marty Minor<MMinor@udkstudios.com> Subject: FW: Herzog residence Do you have a report? From: Richard Brummer <rbrummer@amesint.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 5:15 PM To: Bill Thrasher Subject: Herzog residence Good afternoon Mr. thrasher, I got an email from Marty Minor regarding the Herzog residence that he was done with his review. Please let me know if there is anything you need from us this moment, and if we can stop by the Town and pick up the paperwork for the August 15th submission.. Thanks for all your help and talk to you soon. Cordially yours Richard Brummer Project Director Ames International Architecture Phone 561-274 6444 ext. 2 Fax 561-2746449 www.amesint.com FL AR 0023002 FL AA 0002307 r'l =� MEMORANDUM TO: William Thrasher Town Manager FROM: Marty R.A. Minor, AICP DATE: August 6, 2015 RE: 960 INDIGO POINT REVIEW MEMORANDUM STUDIOS Urban Planning and Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics The following is an analysis of the proposed demolition of an existing house and the construction of the new house at 960 Indigo Point. Request The applicant is seeking Level 3 Architectural Site Plan Approval for a 7,118 -square foot, British Colonial home on 21,719 square feet (0.498 acres) within Place Au Soleil. According to Palm Beach County Property Appraiser records, the existing home is 4,716 -square foot in size and was constructed in 1965. Land Use & Zoning EXISTING USE, ZONING AND LAND USE EXISTING USE ZONING FUTURE LAND USE Subiect Site RS -Place Au Soleil SF (Single Family) 960 Indigo Point North RS -Place Au Soleil SF (Single Family) Single Family Home (955 Indigo Point) East OR- Outdoor Recreational REC (Recreation) Intracoastal Waterway and Gulf Stream Golf Course South RS -Place Au Soleil SF (Single Family) Canal and Single Family Home (955 Emerald Row) West RS -Place Au Soleil SF (Single Family) Single Family Home (940 Indigo Point) 610 Clematis Street Suite CU02 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 561.366.1111 fax www.udkstudios.com LCC000035 Project Details The following is an analysis on how the proposed house addresses the Town's development standards. 960 Indigo Point Town Regulation Proposed Plan Consistent? Floor Area Ratio 0.33 for first 20,000 6,944 square feet of No, Section 70-72 of square feet of lot house +523 square the Town Code + 0.20 for portion of feet of covered restricts roof lot over 20,000 overhang for a total projections above square feet = of 7,467 square feet the FAR limit to 300 6,944 square feet of is provided on the square feet. The house allowed + a submitted plan. A FAR limit for this lot maximum of 300 review indicated an is 7,244 square feet. square feet of overall area of special exception 7,479 square feet of coverage. Total area area. allowed 7,244 square feet Building Height 30 feet 30 feet Yes Maximum Stories 2 stories 2 stories Yes Lot Size 15,000 square feet 21,719 square feet Yes Lot Width 40 feet — pie- 55 feet Yes shapedlot Maximum Second .70 of first floor 2,668 (61%) square Yes Floor Area area feet 4,395 square feet of first floor area = 3,076 square feet allowed on second floor Setbacks Front 30 feet 66 feet Yes Side Total of both side North setback —15 Yes setbacks shall be a feet minimum of 30% of South Setback -18 the lot width; feet, 7 inches however, no single Total Side Setbacks side setback shall be — 33 feet, 7 inches less than 15 feet. Totalsetbacks required: 33 feet, 7 inches Rear 30 feet 30 feet Yes Parking 2 spaces in garage, 3 spaces in garage, Yes 2 spaces outside 1 3 spaces outside Access Access to the lot will be through Indigo Point, which is a two-lane local street within the Place Au Soleil neighborhood. The home, which is proposed to be surrounded by a wall and fence, will be accessed through gated driveway at the entrance to the lot. Landscaping should be incorporated with the fence design. Elevations of the proposed vehicular gates and surrounding wall will need to be provided for the Architectural Review and Planning Board and Town Commission review. Floor Area Ratio Per Section 70-71 of the Town Code sets the maximum size for a single family home through the established Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for the subject lot. As indicated in the table above, the maximum size of the home for the 21,719 square foot lot is 7,244 square feet. The applicant is indicating the proposed house area is 7,467. The review of the CAD plans indicated an area of 7,479 square feet. The applicant will need to recalculate the FAR for the house in compliance with Section 70-70 of the Town Code. Section 70-70, Floor Area Calculation, states "For purposes of computing the floor area ratio, floor area shall be defined as follows. "Floor area" shall mean the gross floor area of a structure as measured from the outside of the exterior walls and shall include or exclude the following: (1) All floor area under a solid roof whether or not the area is enclosed with walls (i.e., porches, balconies, breezeways, etc.) shall be included. (2) Areas under awnings with leg supports or those that extend more than three feet out from a structure shall count as one-half shall be included. (3) Floor area under ceilings which are higher than 15 feet shall count as double. (4) Areas under screen enclosures shall count as one-half. (5) Areas under eaves or roof extensions of 2%: feet or less shall not be included. (6) Areas in basements shall be included as 75 percent when it is located completely under the first floor footprint and has no outside entrance. Areas in basements with an outside entrance shall be included as 100 percent. (7) Areas in attics that cannot be used for living area shall not be included if the ceiling height does not exceed 6'/: feet and there are no windows. The applicant may consider listing or identify the area for each room on the revised floor plan. Architecture The proposed home is identified as having a British Colonial architectural style, which is a preferred architectural style. The Town Code does not provide a description or characteristics of the British Colonial style. However, the Landmark Manual, used by the Town of Palm Beach Landmarks Preservation Committee, does provide a good description of the British Colonial style. This description is attached for your review and information. Please note that several elements of the proposed British Colonial home which are not consistent with the description found in the Town of Palm Beach's Landmarks Commission description. These missing elements from the traditional British Colonial style are: • Arches found over entry doors and garden gateways. • Thick chimneys used to provide grace and strength to the house. " Wood shutters are often incorporated for storm protection. " Steeply -pitched roofs of 6:12 or a 45 degrees slope is typical. The proposed elevations either do not incorporate these elements or not enough information has been provided to determine whether the home is consistent with the British Colonial architectural style. The applicant will need to address how the proposed home can be classified as being part of a British Colonial architectural style. The proposed eave heights exceed the "Preferred" eave heights (8' to 10'6" for one-story and 21 feet or less for two-story eaves) found in the Town Code. The proposed eave heights of 11 feet for the one-story portion and 23 feet for the two-story portions fall under the "Discouraged" category. The Entry Feature is approximately 15'6" is as measured from the finish floor elevation to the upper limit of the balcony railings. This height falls within the "Prohibited" section of the Section 70-100 (c)(3) of the Town Code. For windows, the Town Code prefers the use of muntins to divide glass panes into unified sections of four square feet. The majority of the windows proposed comply with this standard. However, the rear windows for the master bedroom and living room facing the Intracoastal Waterway feature windows that exceed 16 square feet in size. Between 25 and 50 percent of that elevation features the larger windows, which is discouraged by the Town Code. Comments and Questions 1. Section 70-72 (b) limits the area of roof projects to 300 square feet above the maximum allowable Floor Area Ratio for the project. In your application, 523 square feet of roof projections are provided, which exceed the code limitation by 223 feet. Please revise the submitted architectural plans or request the appropriate variance. 2. Please provide an elevation of the proposed entry gate and fencing for the property. Landscaping should be incorporated with the fence design. Elevations of the proposed vehicular gates will need to be provided for the Architectural Review and Planning Board and Town Commission review. 3. Please correct the FAR calculations to conform with Section 70-70 of the Town Code. The applicant may consider listing or identify the area for each room on the revised floor plan. 4. Can you please identify the proposed building colors, including trim colors, roof tile materials and other building materials to the submitted building elevations. 5. The applicant shall provide a narrative describing how the proposed building elevations are consistent with the British Colonial architectural style. 6. The height of the proposed Entry Feature exceeds the "Preferred" and "Discouraged" heights listed within Section 70-100 of the Town Code. Please revise the Entry Feature to comply with the Town's Code. British Colonial Architectural Details Arched Openings: Arches are found over entry doors and garden gateways. Window openings however are rectangular. Chimneys: British Colonial buildings feature traditional open fireplaces, many with waist -high hearths. Thick chimneys give a sense of grace and strength to the house. Flat Cement Tiles: Originally, roofs were covered with coral -limestone roof slates cut 1" by 10" by 14" and were laid horizontally in parallel rows along wooden laths, cemented down and white -washed upon completion. Shuttered Openings: Wood shutters are utilized for storm protection. Steeply Pitched Roof. A roof pitch of 6:12 or a 45 degree slope is typical. 22 1 Landmarks Manual Description British Colonial architecture, also known as the Bermuda style, was inspired by the traditions of the English colonists' architectural heritage. It was adjusted to the character of the local building materials. Ornamental details were kept to a minimum in response to the softness of Bermudas Aeolian limestone. West Indian influences include long cool verandas and small porches with upper balconies. In Palm Beach, the British Colonial house is a simplified version of the Colonial Revival style, characterized by steeply pitched roofs of Bat cement tiles replacing the traditional limestone dates. Other features include pedimented, dormers, quoins and hip roofs. This style of architecture was popularized in Palm Beach by Howard Major and John L.Volk. 5° c AIXA 9Lw. PO4PANO ACCURATE LAND SURVEYORS INC. lFl (954) 792-1441 xa 9EACx RMOA 3]060 L9. IM35 VAX (954) 792-1442 SHEET 2 Oi 2 F. INDIGO POINT;; , MTI " a W Mom . ePsl LOT 71 • c gN.. 16000, • 9 A.1.1. �. N 63911 f YNN M! w t pm5C - ry^ rnw0 C3 wd Non Pd1i T � eMY l� UwVAnM 111��� '. P. Sap3. GARAGE O� \ H 0 tnij•. \N Ay )!IP mw.. � m n 3Vr LOT 70 `_ g41+1a"y" - g TWO STORY RESIDENCE 1960;.q Gd! rr. p(V..n1112W . o mAN F.F.n9v.l nwGn h 2V,A. 3 a �k1¢ C'3� LOT 69�_- r j7 r�mrM4j+cw i srr 1/Y \V eWT M Nd Nd qq — k'AU•mt1,I• f r$ 14'G• �.'T.. \ \.WY•nl ' � 4 wuN..n u Iq ti \ ti \ Ali \. 4' cAIbI "` LOT 69 \ ralo \ pFL 16L mm BgMpMT \ I rpAw Inl e9 \ Ig Y -21719.23 • A''UT CURVE TA6LE f2ca. x1w+µr"L I Mvc 1LN4Ix AANlY3 I.0 WA n vl m .re7v r%IUNq pu�"mlilgi / & a M�. m srmm• urt WOOiurA"7o J n »..e m d•r2•lr GRAPHIC SCALE NOES, v'a"Em amG"IM Nn1rL `WW Yuyedplrs u¢ w Admlplr rm m� ISxnFI AnON' YGplN m nm R m mNry mAi I Iw1E m xl SIgYLIrp 1x[ 2 nrAmlm 5119x1 IIpEO1 N( 9ASm d A MMM' p' NIA lNdpNY C(5tlmm N n i,,a. nl W11p1 µp NA1{ 1 M IYYS ylOwl Nmrd MIE MnrM51RALnp M OI119A9P. 9R d I"'")Yp1111pIR IS NIpCAm d 116 p Ma RWR-p'-•AT. GM m d 0114,,WTd6 W mMd 9Y A[OMAI[ Gx9 my yp ABq[ dp9p ggLLY ,yq yTlq AIF .1 M, mM(Ci In TF 6I W Yf WOMiDM Ma dABnQ. I Mnm1 l nFnA•li W 1 M M9 IINLS F MT NNI n[IpYFm QAIR nYi ll6 9111KT YQR WIIN 1WMGLL SIYgNR9 n 11X5 Mx9 6 mE pNWrNTy W Ip]IIIAR Wq 9191[Tdn w[ µp 91,y Illnpl ANE 1-12 r.9Wlrn m Mr IILtl1A 09.112 W WAI xo! M u5m d ppedVClm yl rAInE p1 w vMI rTmli Nef1U1=IA1LYp1; JNNMT 11M MIn .W NOCIAIId. a 116 511N1[Y 0156R W A YY /.M nII WdE dr R MOI VyD MNW I Vila I3"E AMrlNw ATT 6 w l is s wl"F anmm Im3011. m eC 5>RECEIVED AUG 25 2015 IFN9Ois dF e9 TOWn Of Gul(S(feam. fi / {/(. '' AA � • 7 V'c-/� x99Enr L IxauNsax (PRE9DENT7 PNpE9p1.LL 9/µ14N AIU Yµ1q Muye9 - "AM d IMA S E A � x9r vun wnwT 1' swAnl' A' nC ngN1L MAlim Im sm swFl1A°i oAi NIO YArVG. VOAII/IOIq SV -1. -dm m-14]-1. At/A6� 'NII m11NYa,O1 n9_I._m In• WT rm = sour' rr. E d -m-, MST OA2 W •LmIY dAlw !i a -]s -n °sF p (pFll "iv 1my 9pd u-Iw SCALE 1"=20' °"O1 .r�15U-13-1263 TOWN OF GULF STREAM f> RECEIVED AUG 25 2015 Town of Gulfstream, FL This form is to be used --��� "1rrKOVgL Architectural Review a d Planting Board, Board ofment w BPPlkalions le be heard by the Town of Gulf Stream form properly please review the accompanyingT Adjustment, and/or Town Commission. Development Review Fo own or Gulf Stream Insfmcif Manual forq�mPlele the Form. Failure to complete this form properly will delay Its anaconsl forafton. pplicaflon for ARPBFfle# To be completed by allaPART H. GENERAL INFORMATION ATION A. Pre)ectlnfem7allen I.AA, Project/Owner Name: VL-"it6TH' I•A,2- Project Address: �IaC m0iC Q POINT TOWPI I•A-3. Project Property Legal Description: , Ped ! l'.M l7- L'at (--I LAA. Pfe)ect Descrlpllon (descdbe In dela, InGud r7g # ofsfodes, 1.0.5. Square Footage of New Structure or Addition: —t l Architectural Style: LLL Check all that apply: YArchllectureOSite Plan Elew O Lend Clearing ❑North Ocean Boulevard Overlay (complete section B) Plan of 11 L (complete section GJ 0 Spedial Exception (complete section EJ s 0 Non-resMenlial uses ❑ Vadance I A.T. (a) Proposed F,F.E.: 10,00 H61%11> '�ff�� TYPe of Foundallan: SZ7r l"I B. Owner lnformalion LB.1. Owner Address: �, \;V. G.N� 115 I.B.2, Owner Phone Number, 1.8.3.Owner Signalum::&L' ]-+�L�P� f Le Fax: o� s�C. Agont Information I.C.I. Agent Name and Firm Name: ` 14-�+LE &t -t , Ants ipCCEZNk[ioHkL h4�1 1.0.2- Agent Address: Ze7j LJiX65 (kLRJr� �c41.t_ 3�i44 I.C.3. Agent Ph Numbe / (o) l2'1q-6cL-- cell 1.C.4. A he /) ��Faz cS(a1 App Com ARP13 Dale: Recommendation: TC Dale: Application for Development Approval Form ADA•2000 mWsed 6/73/06 Page 2 raw„dGpwseam, RECEIVED AUG '9g 2015 Town of Gulfstream, FL APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL lhb lams N b ha Vud lar dl Jevelopmml renew 1 °tlurd Revhw and PL:rul'vip paytl, pond olptlaPP�alims b be he by pie Town of Gull Steam OarwPrapaN. News review b. acwepem'al9 Torn d GSbe�� To cDnV le 4Wmen(flevyw rano. Fo11u 1. comPlate IMn form n Mmnel /or lar prepady will d.1, IIs conaltleralion. ARPB Flea �%��� Te be corrWeledby.y c PARTIL GENERAL INFORMATION 0. Pro(adlnlermallen IA" 014-VCwnn Narie k6t4HG-TFT ('FG L. IA2. Pra(nd Addmse: RSC INVi4o POINT TOWN q= � Ulx y� IAI. Pmle<I PraPetTLepM Davi. t.0'I" -(O 'p OF r l Lot � Ua IA4. Pmlecl Oavptlm (tl.mBehdN.( �yyN>I d.lale; HEuT .d �1 CPLU Inc' �� IAS. Serve FodepadNew SSVc4naapddlpm; Arddbebwd Glyle: F.li IA9. raaerrpl.Ml.baeat apW�WWY WtGpl aOuluploatt RtAk�m0 Letl G Clea V O NorIN pian pnyl�,yd 10 Sprl.l Eegpggl(-7veleaedbnD rm �11°at 0 Vvlazo IAT(a)prmaay FF. E: 10.00 NG ��Twnd Fow�tl.pm; - 6 Ownar lnlormallon I.p,t. Qanv Address: ♦? De'bdf( 115 1.02. OwnvPhmeNumSv: 1.9],�C Fw Owen GIP,BWS ��� C. Ayenl lnlormallon I.C.t. Agvll Nnmevd FYm Nana: :'kFj1HE ry(Cc . LO2,htTCS iFtTEt1-(k'lioNhL 0.PLf4. A°'trolo-e.c 203 ixie` LCa.r' l.Rks7 .Pt_ ?a344aF AOmI %tale Nlmber t.C.4. MIS'g ww —Fvt Prn-I1pp Onle; OIIbMI D.. Only AM D.h, ARM Dde: Can owe Reamapaldnlyrp D.cwm; TC O.In: APN'cdbn lmDMbpmml Approval Fam ADA.Zppa avutl 6'rSOp P.pa 2 PART Ill. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ANO JUSTIFICATION To be completed by all applicants ager pre .applicafion conference brief. Attach additional sheets only when necessa question numbarforeach with Town Staff Please be concise but response. ry and be sure to Include the appmpdafe and complete A. Project Description and Justification III.A,I. In what zoning district is the project site Iocaled? III.A2.Is the ro P 0 TZ C-, - P Jett compatible with the Intent of the tonin disukl7 Explain, `h%1^ ro�_. - �yeS13No IIIA.3. Is the project consistent with the Future Land Use Comprehensive Plan? )[yes 0 No Map and goals, objectives an ❑,,.._,_ Policies of the IIIA4, flow are Ingress and egress to the property to be provided? �t7eLt� f C� TWLO �Jel��'�PIC1 IIIA5. How are the following utilities to be provided to the a. Sl Sanitary Drainage �gpPCI� b. Sanitary Seo wer c. Potable Water d, Irrigation Water e. Electricity L Telephone'i"' 6. Gas PUgr— h. Cabi T N IILA.6. IrtheInvolves consistent with the crlleda 'Ilion Of One or more structures, please describe how the slreclures are sheet If necessary.) 144 of the Town of Gulf Stream Code. (Attach additional v�1140i hf_. �..—.•.-. �t FkT i LkNOSt � SRI. ETC , PART IV. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Section A Is fu be completed by all applicants alter pre-appycaflon conference with Town sfaf.. Answering "Yes"fo any question in Section A requires the completkn ofaddilionel Sections as indicated. A. Additional ApprovalslRequirements IV -&I. Does the project Involve land area within fifty feel (50.) or the AIA (North Ocean Boulevard) right-of- waY? ❑Yes ,KNo (If "Yes", section 8 of this pad must be Completed.) IV.A.2, Does the project Involve the domolilion of one or more shuclures?15�Yes 11 No (If "Yes", section C of this pad must be completed.) X IV.A,3. Does the project involve the Gearing or filling of any portion of an existing vacant tot or more than firly Percent (50%) or the landscaped area of a developed 1017 ❑ Yes (If "Yes", sectionD of this part must be completed.) /&rNo N.A.S. Does the project require approval of a Special Exception?O Oyes ,sj No (If "Yes', section E of this pad must be completed.) N.A.G. Is the project at variance with any regulations contained in the Zoning Code? ❑ Yes ANO (If"Yes", section G or this part must be completed.) APplicalin for Dovelopmenl Approval Form ADA.32000 Page 3 B. Projects Requiring North Ocean Boulevard Overlay Permit IV-B.I. What signlficanl landscape fealures or architectural features are to be disturbed or added and to what extent? IV -B.2. Describe the need and justification for the disturbance/addition: IV.B.3. Will the dlslurbance/addition destroy or seriously impair visual relationships among buildings, landscape features and open space, or introduce incompatible landscape features or plant material that destroys or Impairs signiricanl views or vistas within the North Ocean Bculevard Overlay District? yes No Explain: IV.8.4. How is the design consistent with the AIA Landscape Enhancement Project,( N.B.S. What mitigation is proposed so that the disturbance/addition has the leas, Impact possible to Ilse visual and aeslhelfc quality of the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District: C. Projects Requiring a Demolition Permit IV -C -i. When are the extsling structures to be demolished? F ALL $p IS IV -C.2. When are the proposed structures to be constructed? 54MQX I IV.C.3. What Is the landmark status of the slruclures lobe demolished? 1`l UN D. Projects Requiring a Land Clearing Permit IV.D.I. Describe those vegetative materials of a Inches In diameter and greater to be North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District: IV -D.2. Describe the need and justification for the removal/relacalion: IV -D.3. Haw Is the removal from the project site of vegetation to be mitigated: IV -D.4. Haw are the remaining and relocated vegetative malerfafs to be protected and preserved during the land clearing and constriction activities and thereafter? IV -D-5- What replacement materials are proposed? Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 February 2002 Page 4 ®RPCEIVED4 E. ProJecls RequirinB a Spoclal Exception. — A IV.E.1. Is the proposed use a permitted special Town of Gulfstream, FL Is the IV.E.2. liow exception use? )<Yes No Code Section: use designetl, located end proposed to ❑ welfare, and morals Will be Protected? 6e operated so that the public health, safely, 90Hc_ .,,_,— , IV.E.3. Will theus �� e cause su stanlial Injury to the value of other property be located? [3 Yes No P Pent In the neighborhood Where It is to Explafn._�G5l4mr �_._ ,.. , . MCA. How �� Will the use be compalibla Wilh ad of is le be located? j ning development and the character of the District where II 1V -E-5- What landscaping and screening o re Provided? cZG rte.._ IV.E.s. Doan the us — located? gYe9onO n with all applicable Explain._ regulations governing the District wherein It is la he F. Nan- Residonllal ProJecls and Rosidontial projects of Greater than 2 U IV""- Ifcommon are nits a facilities are to be provided, describe them Intl hoW they are to be maintained. IV.F.2. Iproperties.f recreation facilities are l0 6e prov(tled, describe them and theirolenlial im p pacts on surrounding IV.F.3. For each she fnllowinp Ling aces: Its, lho number provided and their dimensions, oadSp Standard Parking Spaces: Small Car Parking Spaces: Handicapped Application for Development Approval Form ADA -32000 Page 5 Rita Taylor From: Marty Minor <MMinor@udkstudios.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 3:15 PM To: Richard Brummer Cc: Bill Thrasher; Rita Taylor Subject: RE: Herzog residence Yes, please. Thank you, marty Marty R.A. Minor, AICP Urban Design Kilday Studios 610 Clematis Street Suite CU -02 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561)366-1100 From: Richard Brummer [mailto:rbrummer@amesint.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 3:07 PM To: Marty Minor <MMinor@udkstudios.com> Cc: Bill Thrasher (bthrasher@gulf-stream.org) <bthrasher@gulf-stream.org>; Rita Taylor<RTaylor@gulf-stream.org> Subject: RE: Herzog residence Do I have to submit hard copies to the town or send you PDF files to get the approval to get the paperwork for submission Cordially yours Richard Brummer Project Director Ames International Architecture Phone 561-274 6444 ext. 2 Fax 561-2746449 www.amesint.com FL AR 0023002 FL AA 0002307 From: Marty Minor[mailto:MMinor(aaudkstudios.comj Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 3:04 PM To: Richard Brummer Cc: Bill Thrasher (bthrasher(&oulf-stream.ora); Rita Taylor Subject: RE: Herzog residence Richard, Good afternoon. I wanted to remind you that there are several code compliance items outstanding with this application and that the review cannot and will not progress until all the code provisions have been addressed. Although we have discussed various ways to address these issues, compliance with the Town Code and proceeding forward will only be determined through a complete and accurate response to the items highlighted in my memorandum. Once your full written resubmittal with revised plans are submitted to the Town, we will review for compliance with the Town Code. Once that compliance is determined and not before, the review process will continue. Thank you, marty Marty R.A. Minor, AICP Urban Design Kilday Studios 610 Clematis Street Suite CU -02 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561366-1100 From: Richard Brummer [maiito:rbrummer0amesint.coml Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 3:40 PM To: Rita Taylor <RTavlorPgulf-stream.org> Subject: Herzog residence Good afternoon Rita, I talked to Marty today and we went over the Memorandum. Comments and questions: 1. The area calculations, it was a misunderstood addition, we actually comply with the requirements of the ordinances. 2. Front entry gate, I will add to the plans a picture of the existing gate that they want to keep. 3. We will add a graphic description on how the areas were calculated as recommended by Marty. 4. Do you need actual samples or just a call out on what each of the materials and colors will be. We do have also color rendering that will give a better idea on how the house will look like. 5. The architectural style, we are actually changing the architectural description, we fit into the Anglo Caribbean style, I will add a small description on the cover sheet to clarify, Marty agrees with this. 6. Regarding the front entry feature, I review this with Marty and even the code is not clear on this requirement and after talking to Marty we will present the current front elevation and an alternative so we can present both to the board and have them give us their recommendation. So we basically will have both front entry to present to the board. Rita based on this, can I pick up the application so I can start filling it up and have it ready for this Friday together with all the plans. Please let me know so I can stop by. Thanks for all your help, talk to you soon Cordially yours Richard Brummer Project Director Ames International Architecture Phone 561-274 6444 ext. 2 Fax 561-2746449 www.amesint.com FL AR 0023002 FL AA 0002307 Rita Tavlor From: Rita Taylor Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 2:29 PM To: MMinor@udkstudios.com Subject: FW: Herzog residence Marty: Please give Bill & I a call to discuss this info (encl.) that we received from the architect on the Herzog plans. Thanks Rita From: Richard Brummer [mailto:rbrummer@amesint.com] Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 3:40 PM To: Rita Taylor <RTaylor@gulf-stream.org> Subject: Herzog residence Good afternoon Rita, I talked to Marty today and we went over the Memorandum. Comments and questions: 1. The area calculations, it was a misunderstood addition, we actually comply with the requirements of the ordinances. 2. Front entry gate, I will add to the plans a picture of the existing gate that they want to keep. 3. We will add a graphic description on how the areas were calculated as recommended by Marty. 4. Do you need actual samples orjust a call out on what each of the materials and colors will be. We do have also color rendering that will give a better idea on how the house will look like. 5. The architectural style, we are actually changing the architectural description, we fit into the Anglo Caribbean style, I will add a small description on the cover sheet to clarify, Marty agrees with this. 6. Regarding the front entry feature, I review this with Marty and even the code is not clear on this requirement and after talking to Marty we will present the current front elevation and an alternative so we can present both to the board and have them give us their recommendation. So we basically will have both front entry to present to the board. Rita based on this, can I pick up the application so I can start filling it up and have it ready for this Friday together with all the plans. Please let me know so I can stop by. Thanks for all your help, talk to you soon Cordially yours Richard Brummer Project Director Ames International Architecture Phone 561-274 6444 ext. 2 Fax 561-2746449 www.amesint.com FL AR 0023002 FL AA 0002307 . Rita Taylor From: Richard Brummer <rbrummer@amesint.com> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 3:40 PM To: Rita Taylor Subject: Herzog residence Good afternoon Rita, I talked to Marty today and we went over the Memorandum. Comments and questions: 1. The area calculations, it was a misunderstood addition, we actually comply with the requirements of the ordinances. 2. Front entry gate, I will add to the plans a picture of the existing gate that they want to keep. 3. We will add a graphic description on how the areas were calculated as recommended by Marty. 4. Do you need actual samples or just a call out on what each of the materials and colors will be. We do have also color rendering that will give a better idea on how the house will look like. 5. The architectural style, we are actually changing the architectural description, we fit into the Anglo Caribbean style, I will add a small description on the cover sheet to clarify, Marty agrees with this. 6. Regarding the front entry feature, I review this with Marty and even the code is not clear on this requirement and after talking to Marty we will present the current front elevation and an alternative so we can present both to the board and have them give us their recommendation. So we basically will have both front entry to present to the board. Rita based on this, can I pick up the application so I can start filling it up and have it ready for this Friday together with all the plans. Please let me know so I can stop by. Thanks for all your help, talk to you soon Cordially yours Richard Brummer Project Director Ames International Architecture Phone 561-274 6444 ext. 2 Fax 561-2746449 www.amesint.com FL AR 0023002 FL AA 0002307 TOWN OF GULF STREAM ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING REPORT Application N: 015-11 Owner. M/ M Kenneth Herzog Address: 915 Emerald Row Agent, Shane Ames, Ames Int Architecture Proposed Improvement, Construction of a two-story, single family dwelling Approvals Requested. Effective Lot Area: 21,719 SF Demolition Permit, To remove the existing structures from the property. Land Clearing Permit: To clear the property for the new construction. Special Exception: To permit 180 SF of covered unenclosed area that Architectural Style: Anglo Caribbean exceeds the maximum floor area ratio (Section 70-72 (b) (2))• Level III Architectural/Site Plan: To permit tire construction of a 7,124 SF two-story, single family, Anglo Caribbean style dwelling with attached three car garage and a swimming pool. Gross Lot size: 21,719 SF Effective Lot Area: 21,719 SF Proposed Total Floor Area: 7,124 SF Allowable: 6,944 SF, plus 180 Special Exception Zoning District: RS -P Height, 295; Preferred 530' Finished Floor. 7.0' NAVD Architectural Style: Anglo Caribbean Neighborhood: Mixed Issues Considered During Review: Section 66-144 Standards: Regarding Level II k III architectural/site plan review Section 70-4 How to use this manual: Regarding Design Standards (3) Discouraged are items thought to not comply with the jollotsiuggools with respect to desimd zoning district character and quality: "Consistency of neighborhood character". NOTE: This application has discouraged items presently. It is very possible that the existing entry gate, if not removed, causes an additional discouraged item. There are no front gates in the neighborhood and only three preexisting gates in the entire district with date of original unknown. Since this application is a 100% new re -developed lot, the application must comply with all sections of the code. Section 66-154 Standards (For Granting Variances) see page CD66:46 and CD66:47 There are eight (8) standards to be reviewed in granting a variance. All eight standards must be met in order to allow a variance. For example, if seven (7) standards are met and only one was not met, the variance should be denied. Section 70-100 Roof and eave heights NOTE: DISCOURAGED POSSIBLY PROHIBITIED. The height of the entry feature as measured from FFE to top of roof is approximately 17'. The Code controls the height of the entry feature by considering the entry feature height to be the same as an save height. As such, the height of the entry feature should he no greater than 10.5' as measured from the FFE Architectural Review and Planning Board ARPB File #015-11 ARPB September 24,2015; TC October 9, 2015 Page 2 to the top of the roof. The agent will be presenting why the proposed entry feature height is appropriate for the architectural design. NOTE: DISCOURAGED. The first story eave height is 12'6" which is the maximum of the discouraged range (10'6" to 12' 6"). Section 70-101 Windows. (C) Discouraged. (1) Windorus as a dmninant element ... (4) Betteeen 25 percent and 50 percent of total mindoto opening area on all elevation composed of undivided panes larger than eight squarefeet. NOTE: DISCOURAGED. Window element as shown on Sheet "PO4 Rear Elevation" appear to dominant the architectural design. NOTE: DISCOURAGED. The windows shown on Sheet "PO5 Veranda/Master Bedroom Elevation" fail within the 25 percent to 50 percent range and therefore create a discouraged element. Section 70-107 Additions and rehabilitations and replacement of existing features (b) (3) Additions mul/or rehabilitated projects which exceed 75 percent of the fair market value of lite existing structure shall be considered to be near struchires and shall be subject to lite standards found in this chapter. NOTE: PREEXISTING ENTRANCE GATE. Section 70-187 (5) Entrance Gates NOTE: DISCOURAGED its Place an Soleil Section 70-238 Roofs. Recommendation: Motion to recommend approval of a demolition permit. Motion to recommend approval a land clearing permit. Motion to recommend approval of a Special Exception to permit 100 SF of covered unenclosed area that exceeds the maximum Boor area ratio (Section 70-72 (b) (2)). Motion to recommend approval of Level III Architectural/Site Plan based on the finding that the proposed construction of a 7,124 SF two-story, single family, Anglo Caribbean style dwelling with attached three car garage and a swimming pool meet the minimum intent of the Design Manual and applicable review standards with the following conditions: 1. The overall height of the entry feature shall be no greater than 10.5' as measured from the FFE. 2. Any minor modifications in the landscape plan shall be submitted to the Town Manager for review and approval and any major modifications shall be brought back to the ARPB for review and approval, prior to commencement of landscaping. 3. All boat lifts, docks, seawalls etc. will conform to Town Ordinance 66-369 Docks. 4. Discouraged items shall be no more than three, otherwise the application must be denied per Section 70-4 (4) (b). The agent was informed of possible denial of this application based on the number of discouraged elements. Architectural Review and Planning Board ARPB File #015-11 ARPB September 24,2015; TC October 9, 2015 ARPB Date: September 24, 2015 Action: Demolition: Land Clearing: Special Exception: Level III Architectural/Site Plan: Action deferred to ARPB Hearing to be held October 22, 2015 at 8:30 A.M. (M) Page 3 ��s m I man fill ifill gimgiu P! N 40 m KEN & IRMA HERZOG RESIDENCE :z -W C m ri i ! • d F :,Ri i ' 15' �o � !. n. la ei j'flll !. ]i _=1 ��v{ � Y R� THE HE�� mRESIDENCE N ao a _�/ i 7 1 '} u+! S 1'z 0 air IQ m = nf, �i,il! \' e1- ! F 3; i i e IN ; ; } �} 9 3ie �i t� la 5i Hil 1i i g ! 1-, t o eu• !u y 1°i3 t� f u3� ' iit t'J a is Py o i,3 't \(D 5314_ ! 6g I I B 1 g6 y °ij'jili t°3a 19`i}i+'(;���i•-3'{" ( iiS iai3s!i }•ti i-:'�c� lti 3i3ta 7 ' � ii it{3 —� ! t 11 i!, � ,� lta t,, �,��r: 3� 'i3ii4! 3{t H !}131' la lii }-' it 3(1 t t3'• .{ } t� ;t j, i ;�9 �, ;11;js,; ji 3• I'", itijj i• !` s. tijt , ', i, e 3 3! Ii t3A; it 1 , m i 3 i i� Ij (i t i 3i 13 ijj ii it it( I;'1 j 3i li 3j ii; Ij #�,�'i i it it �� 3 1 1 € I i ��' j• �i i � I i i, ! � 1,:,.I ; I fti • �� t , Six i!tt: 3Si,ltfi t �13i i 3 t ii, tj a �(li t ,I1 I ( � Ili !•iii 1 , la I y li, �•Ij tt � r,. !1.°! ; ! (j n ,. ai ; ! •`i(; ;i Ij�i .i3 i ij ; fj3ji•y MAI ESTIC, VIEWS LANDSCAPES MCM • THE HE�� mRESIDENCE N t SPECIFICATIONS NV -1d 3dVOS(INVI 3AS "�••"'•^�^-'�• - '�::•"�•,;•�.:� ii 7 s y i wm,,:ii+woaR.%�m:xr+w:emwn S E� 30NaOI M E)OZN3H 3HL SID31IH:)W 3dVOSUNWI SM3IA :)ILS3CVW ®11_ Y c d c9St—ct—ns= AZ=.t 31tl0s cul -u I" 'nn n -a -YY 1;�A %� ` ..Cyr W w• moi' �nmi (n5Y YGGe myl aY mwla Ie Wrm aEMn q YrY IN 1WVeY0 /,Y, Y.UIIlE rO1011 q Uva - MGl N IpLLYn qI =,w, Tm59gly Vd) NOSdIIOHl -1 1tl3Wtl Lle/r n -m -i9 '11 i 006 lm aw �(1Y3 J• _- 1��� � NW [I-rl-m xourawm-M nvn aNa sR/n rrm-.a WGi-11-1e npl/YY6tl YpO11YAT'E �Ytl 1r11nM ]M .LGyr1'•I pl Wmm a� pn llllYlOe YLL IIdYY Yry/. IM arl rl, 1 y 3 S N ae vw smmsw a omNavnm vv lwW t11 `� E m rmlol muuYn v nYanl mo vuwuvxn y IurvilwiMmli G� N j y �nYYr]s I. OL 101 11M1LLW OIrA lP1 SI ]Yl 'I m,W 101 Yry tlYn Y A ySBM] YENS Slw p Y� TW[ WII 1W(YM Yml]WL ly b .ryyr W WII. I.., 1Wtl M m ]bIY N 0Y11mLLW �v1x11nMn {pry 'SmIEIGe �, ONVI A MOY YmQ11 TIl 1e nL/JpY SI -R ]yY U 6MIYOMIS J Yws MIY 3Y YNVI LYMOY q a1YMW ]N SI ONNYm GVY S LplWb111 Mwm1 TIYYI elnll lEN6 9LL lYW m Ipllb111 I'glpe ryry Am{YlylY In nDVn0011 leN 1M ! $TMY MY Sglpl A JetlMYe V A ISIS NI m liMtl61 pM YYIe�Y yry o Mlr IEMe yypm EIWY pyf !yy B 7M'GbY1Wn5 M1LLI YYIYOV ae GYNItl q SNSl1w IUYO m LN)nEY) •1YN-A-$1NSY I VN IOlS6 $w m OYV.Iptl SY yWlpYpll eNpl m 1E altr •GYY • u . MamlSw mJ ml]rYSW I Wen Seryl ]ly [ EYN OY IWtlw mY LII®M! TLL M aIOLW QU a Y/N q •Jw10e v Iq AVB ]W m]XMI NWIe SJMWIB 2 MU l NLL nllEY6lYnpN EYN I IM IIYYS] m 61 SVy 4 Ygiyl ILLY IHYIgmV N ]W ylpnypnVln mYl mIW EYIWIU�6S]Ynr�i S3[09 31tlOs nlHatlas _ %ulm q>In f 8/ mN� AL[V.M WF Gr[L w AJ6Y mGG nL ai ]xNl TYn MIIn1 � .Gi...6V (AV,- swore wan ]nuu NNnyL Poll 318tl1 3�m0 sa _O0S uv 3Wros rc'uyx"3zn vm \ as lm \ aWaxw wTs +w by \ Yc Ktt m \ O 1;�A %� ` ..Cyr W w• moi' �nmi (n5Y �' =�= , •i _. IN 1WVeY0 /,Y, Y.UIIlE \ 69 10l Py 69 101 N � i � .LGyr1'•I pl Wmm a� .Pok r arl rl, N IWu,�nY \ a omNavnm vv lwW -0968 3ON301s3a'. SIV +w by \ Yc Ktt m \ O 1;�A %� ` ..Cyr W w• moi' �nmi (n5Y �' =�= , •i _. IN 1WVeY0 /,Y, Y.UIIlE Py 69 101 N � i � .LGyr1'•I pl YGvn a� .Pok r rl, N _ t a omNavnm vv lwW -0968 3ON301s3a'. SIV F� AHO15 OM1 $ '.ty y y �nYYr]s I. OL 101 4y fid. ly b .ryyr W Yrui J .lrYr � \ B altr •GYY • u . M41 it l 4 tlatl0 30VUVO •PoOL 1• � •� �.: ]mIYAYT •n. IPYYm qE lm+�wY is lT-t, �I aro YfYI s" nMl nn / M^Y•.Y NrLn JYN �• ` ➢Ln oa` s IOO'OSL � • "\•rG xµ6 W^NYP 1 ] • tL 101 l wl[nw mw n .UlWy�Nn la `1NIOd OOIONI E•N� T9 Y6 yg Z10Z1336 LYYI-LBL (e5fi) 'MVdMc.' '9'1 09fiC[ V(Iw d IYYI-LBL (YSfi) "T31 •�N� •saoiY�alans ridla'(N19 JILNYLLV 3 OSII -vanoov