Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutCity Council_Minutes_1989-07-18_Regular 19891 1 CITY OF TEMPLE CITY CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 18, 1989 INITIATION: 1. CALL TO ORDER: Pursuant to Agenda posted on July 14, 1989, Mayor Froehle called the meeting of the City Council to order at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday, July 18, 1989. 2. The invocation was given by Father Thomas King, St. Luke's Catholic Church, 9451 East Broadway. 3. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Tamora Pica, a Temple City student in attendance with her classmates to ob- serve Council in session. 4. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Atkins, Breazeal, Gillanders, Swain and Froehle Also Present: City Manager Koski, City Attorney Martin, Community Development Director Dawson, Public Works Director Peterson, Temple City Times Editor Singer, Pacesetter Staff Writer Holtzclaw and SGV Tribune Staff Writer Medve. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR: Councilmember Swain noted her abstention on Item A. Council- member Breazeal, referring to Item F, pointed out that he is the delegate and not the alternate as stated in staff's memo. Councilmember Gillanders stated he would abstain from voting on Item E. Councilmember Gillanders moved to approve the Consent Calendar, with the above -noted changes; seconded by Councilmember Swain and unanimously carried. A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of June 20, 1989 - Council approved as written, with Councilmember Swain abstaining. City Council Minutes - July 18, 1989 - Page 2 B. ACCEPTANCE OF BID: PROJECT 89 -1, CAPE & SLURRY SEAL PRO- GRAM, MAINTENANCE AREA 3 - Council accepted low bid from I.P.S. Services, Inc. in the amount of $174,408.22 and authorized the Mayor to sign agreement. C. CONTRACT AMENDMENT FOR STREET SWEEEPING SERVICES (COMMUNITY DISPOSAL) - Council approved Community Disposal Company's request for an increase of 6.88% in street sweeping costs for 1989 -90 to an adjusted base of $85,504. D. FIREWORKS STANDS - 1989 REFUND OF DEPOSITS - Council approved refund of deposit per staff memo dated July 18, 1989. E. RESOLUTION NO. 89 -2884: SCJPIA LIFE INSURANCE PROGRAM - Council adopted Resolution No. 89 -2884, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY ELECTING TO PAR- TICIPATE IN THE EMPLOYEE HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN OF THE SOUTH- ERN CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY, with Councilmember Gillanders abstaining. F. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE - SAN FRANCISCO, OCTOBER 22 -25, 1989 - Council approved attendance for those City Officials au- thorized to attend and authorized conference expenses as budgeted; and designated Tom Breazeal as voting delegate and Pat Froehle as voting alternate. G. FINAL MAP APPROVAL: PARCEL MAP NO. 19967 AT 5429 BALDWIN AVENUE (VAN ORDEN /CARMICHAEL) - Council approved Final Parcel Map No. 19967, made the necessary findings as enumerated in the Los Angeles County Public Works Department's letter dated July 12, 1989, and instructed the City Clerk to endorse on the face of the map of Parcel Map No. 19967 the certificate that embodies the approval of said map. 1 1 1 1 1 City Council Minutes - July 18, 1989 - Page 3 H. FINAL MAP APPROVAL: PARCEL MAP NO. 19876 AT 10534 FREER STREET (CHI NIN CHOW) - Council approved Final Parcel Map No. 19876; approved and accepted work agreements and improvement securities; made the necessary findings as enumerated in the Los Angeles County public Works Department's letter dated June 21, 1989; and instructed the City Clerk to endorse on the face of the map of Parcel Map No. 19876, the certificate that embodies the approval of said map. I. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS FROM THEIR REGULAR MEETINGS OF JUNE 17, 1989 AND JULY 11, 1989 - Council received and filed. J. RESOLUTION NO. 89 -2883: APPOINTMENT OF PERSONNEL - Council adopted Resolution No. 89 -2883 approving the em- ployment of budgeted personnel. K. RESOLUTION NO. 89 -2885: APPROVAL OF PAYMENT OF BILLS - Council adopted Resolution No. 89 -2885 allowing claims and demands in the amount of $689,727.73. 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: A. ORDINANCE NO. 89 -652: RE- INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING - MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT RELATING TO THE POSITION OF CITY CLERK - Providing background information, City Manager Koski stated that on June 20, 1989 Council introduced for first reading Ordinance No. 89 -652 repealing Section 2211 of the Temple City Municipal Code which consolidated the position of City Clerk and City Manager. Pursuant to Article 3, Chapter 4 of the Government Code certain financial and accounting responsibilities are imposed upon the office of City Clerk. Section 37209 of the Government Code allows for the trans- fer of these responsibilities to the Director of Finance. Councilmember Swain moved to Re- introduce fcr first reading by title only Ordinance No. 89 -652, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DELETING SECTION 2211, CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE II OF THE TEMPLE CITY MUNICIPAL CODE AS IT RELATES TO THE OFFICE OF CITY CLERK; seconded by Councilmember Gillanders and unanimously carried. City Council Minutes - July 18, 1989 - Page 4 7. NEW BUSINESS: A. PUBLIC HEARING: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89 -1 TO REDESIGNATE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM INSTITUTIONAL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SO AS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE PROPOSED RESI- DENTIAL USE OF THE R -2 ZONED SITE AT 5308. MC CULLOCH AVENUE (MUR -SOL, INC.) - As background, City Manager Koski stated that City Council on June 6, 1989 approved a Conditional Use Permit, Tenta- tive Tract Map and Zone Variance to allow the development of 7 detached condominiums on the subject site. The matter before Council is a General Plan Amendment to redesignate the site from "Institutional" to "Medium Density Residen- tial". This General Plan Amendment would provide for consistency between the City's Zoning and the General Plan. Mayor Froehle declared the public hearing open and invited anyone wishing to address Council on the matter to come forward at this time. As there was no one who wished to address this matter, Councilmember Breazeal moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Councilmember Gillanders and unanimously car- ried. Councilmember Breazeal stated this case was previously heard by the Planning Commission and the Minutes of that meeting should be incorporated into the testimony at this hearing. Based on staff's findings, he could approve this amendment. Councilmember Swain had no additional comments. Councilmember Atkins stated the change from institutional back to residential will make it consistent with the neigh- borhood and he felt it was appropriate. Councilmember Gillanders had no problem in accepting this change. Councilmember Gillanders moved to approve Negative Declara- tion and adopt Resolution No. 89 -2886, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89 -1; seconded by Councilmember Atkins and unanimously carried. 1 1 1 1 City Council Minutes - July 18, 1989 - Page 5 B. PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89 -990 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 47651 AT 6142 -6158 ROSEMEAD BOULE- VARD (DA -AN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION) - Providing background information, City Manager Koski stated the applicant proposes to develop 12 condominium units on the subject R -3 zoned site. The proposed development is not in conflict with current building moratoriums for the R -3 Zone. The proposed project consists of two -story buildings with surface level parking. The proposed Floor Area Ratio is .69 and the maximum F.A.R. is .70. Council questioned staff as to whether this project con- forms to the current moratoria. If constructed, will it be sprinklered because of the living quarters over the garage and does it meet all the requirements. Community Development Director Dawson, in reply, stated the plan originally called for 16 units but because of prohibi- tion of subterranean parking and the moratorium it was redesigned twice. It does meet all the requirements. Mayor Froehle declared the public hearing open and invited anyone wishing to address Council on this issue to come forward at this time. Stella Kuo, 648 W. Garvey, Monterey Park, stated the repre- sentative who was to address Council on the project had not arrived. Ms. Kuo said she felt this was a very nice pro- ject for Temple City. This project went before the Plan- ning Commission on June 27th and they have worked very closely with City officials through two moratoriums. They are now requesting 12 units, down from 16 units, with a F.A.R. of .69. She has read all the conditions and agrees to work with them. As there was no one else who wished to speak on the issue, Councilmember Breazeal moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Councilmember Atkins and unanimously carried. Councilmember Swain said the applicant came in with plans and there was a problem with subterranean parking and overbuilding. The project was redesigned at considerable expense and they have now come up with a very acceptable project with fewer dwelling units than allowed. She felt it is a good project. City Council Minutes - July 18, 1989 - Page 6 Councilmember Atkins called it a fairly ordinary project at an acceptable location. They have made an effort to con- form to all current ordinances. He did remark on a case recently where during construction damage was done to neighboring property and asked if there any conditions to prevent this from occurring? City Manager Koski inquired of City Attorney Martin as to whether anything can be put into the conditions to cover this item. City Attorney Martin questioned if they wanted to get into the position of judging as to whether something has been fixed properly, etc. You can control this within reason. Councilmember Gillanders indicated his concern regarding ingress and egress on Rosemead Boulevard. He felt the trees limited the driver's vision. He suggested the possi- bility of red curbing in front of the building and perhaps limitation on the height of the shrubbery to alleviate possible problems. Councilmember Swain pointed out that his concern regarding shrubbery height is addressed in Resolution 89- 1504PC, Planning Section, Item 2... "Front yard landscaping shall not exceed a height of 24 "." Councilmember Breazeal had nothing to add. He did notice the many conditions. They have revised the plans twice, there is no opposition and they meet all requirements in the R -3 Zone. Mayor Froehle remarked on the City's concern regarding density. The architect and developer in this case have met all the criteria and he is not opposed to the project. Answering Council regarding the site from a property nui- sance standpoint, Community Development Director Dawson stated Condition #8, Planning Section, requires the appli- cant to maintain the property free of weeds and debris until start of project and until project is completed. Councilmember Gillanders moved to approve the Negative Declaration, seconded by Councilmember Breazeal and unani- mously carried. Councilmember Gillanders moved to approve Tentative Tract Map No. 47651 and Conditional Use Permit No. 89 -990 with the stipulation that it be referred to the Traffic Commis- sion to look at the feasibility of red curbing in front of the property, seconded by Councilmember Atkins and unani- mously carried. 1 1 1 1 City Council Minutes - July 18, 1989 - Page 7 C. PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING CC'DE - As background, City Manager Koski stated the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and adopted a resolu- tion recommending certain Zoning Code Amendments. Several of these Code Amendments have been discussed in relation- ship to specific applications that have been considered by the Planning Commission. Others are being recommended by staff in order to improve administration of the Zoning Code. The specific amendments to be considered at this time were summarized by Mr. Koski and are enumerated in staff's memo dated July 18, 1989. Councilmember Swain suggested taking each amendment sepa- rately in an effort to keep some type of order. Mayor Froehle declared the public hearing open and invited anyone wishing to address Council on this matter to come forward at the proper time. Section 9111- A change to the definition of accessory buildings to specify that such buildings shall be single story and shall not exceed 15 feet in height. As there was no one who wished to speak on this item, Councilmember Atkins moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Councilmember Gillanders and unanimously car- ried. Councilmember Breazeal moved to approve amendment of Sec- tion 9111 of the Zoning Code as summarized above, seconded by Councilmember Gillanders and unanimously carried. Mayor Froehle declared the public hearing open. Section 9116- An amendment to further define a guest house as being a single story structure not to exceed 640 square feet of living area. Councilmember Breazeal moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Councilmember Gillanders and unanimously car- ried. Councilmember Swain moved to approve amendment of Section 9116 as summarized above, seconded by Councilmember Atkins and unanimously carried. Mayor Froehle declared the public hearing open. City Council Minutes - July 18, 1989 - Page 8 Section 9119- Possible amendment to the "Flag Lot Ordi- nance": Restrict the development of newly created flag lots to a single story structure. Councilmember Gillanders moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Councilmember Atkins and unanimously carried. Councilmember Gillanders stated he liked the initial re- strictions discussed for flag lots to restrict the flag lot structure to single story. It provides for better aesthet- ics and has the appearance of less density. Councilmember Atkins expressed his disapproval of flag lots and stated he would support Council's recommendation as opposed to Planning Commission's recommendation. Councilmember Swain confirmed that two -story dwellings are allowed in all zones; however, she felt flag lots were different in that the lot in the center may impact as many as six surrounding residential properties. She felt re- stricting the flag lot dwelling to single story would be a good recommendation. Councilmember Breazeal abstained on this item because of a possible conflict of interest. Councilmember Gillanders moved to approve amending Section 9119 limiting the flag lot structure to single story with a maximum height of 15 feet and refer back to the Planning Commission, seconded by Councilmember Atkins and carried, with Councilmember Breazeal abstaining. Section 9202- An amendment to the Conditional Use Permit Section of the Zoning Code to require a CUP for government facilities or uses, homes for the aged, and nursing and convalescent hospitals. Mayor Froehle declared the public hearing open. As there was no one who wished to address Council on this item, Councilmember Gillanders moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Councilmember Breazeal and unanimously carried. Councilmember Atkins remarked that this is almost a cleri- cal matter. It is necessary to bring the General Plan and Zoning Map into consistency. Councilmember Atkins moved to approve amendment to Section 9202 as summarized above, seconded by Councilmember Gil - landers and unanimously approved. 1 1 1 1 1 City Council Minutes - July 18, 1989 - Page 9 Sections 9291 and 9362 Amendments to correct an inconsis- tency within the Code relative to required parking. Mayor Froehle declared the public hearing open. As there was no one who wished to address Council on this issue, Councilmember Gillanders moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Councilmember Atkins and unanimously carried. Councilmember Gillanders moved to approve amendment to Sections 9291 and 9362 as summarized above, seconded by Councilmember Swain and unanimously approved.. Section 9296 A. An amendment to require an 11 foot wide parking space when the parking space is located adjacent to a wall, structure or other obstruction. Mayor Froehle declared the public hearing open. Richard Dearth, 4533 Clubhouse, Lakewood., referred to a permit he received two years ago to build a duplex. With the 11 foot wide parking space requirement pro- posed, he could not build that same project. He felt the imposition of this requirement would squeeze out the small builders and cause just that much more hassle to get a building permit. As there was no one else who wished to speak on this item, it was moved, seconded and unanimously carried to close the public hearing. Council member Atkins understood where Mr. Dearth was coming from. A few years ago they required 10' wide parking spaces but they are now smaller because of compact cars. It's a trade -off. The only problem he had was in the language itself. He would add the word "permanent" and have it read ...other permanent ob- struction. Councilmember Gillanders also understood Mr. Dearth's comments. One additional difficulty is with current two -door automobile models with seat belts that hinder exiting from the rear seat. Other spaces are now 9' instead of 10' and this 11' requirement is only where one side is up against a permanent wall or structure. Councilmember Breazeal said he could go with the 11' and the addition of the word "permanent ". City Council Minutes - July 18, 1989 - Page 10 Councilmember Swain said she was unaware of any problem in this area. The ordinance has been in place for a long time and, to her knowledge, they have had no problems or complaints. As far as exiting the automo- bile, they can exit from the other side away from the wall or structure. Many projects are having difficulty coming up with adequate parking and by adding this restriction they may be eliminating some projects by cutting out perhaps one vitally needed space. She is not in favor of this amendment. Mayor Froehle expressed no objection to the change. If there are unique and unusual circumstances they can apply for a zone variance. Councilmember Atkins moved to approve amendment to Section 9296 A. as summarized above, with the inclusion of the word "permanent" as suggested; seconded by Councilmember Gillanders and carried on a roll call vote as follows: ROLL CALL: AYES: Councilmembers Atkins, Breazeal, Gillanders and Froehle NOES: Councilmember Swain ABSENT: None B. An amendment to require a 16 foot wide (two -way) drive- way for parking areas serving 6 or more vehicles rather than 5 or more vehicles. Mayor Froehle declared the public hearing open. As there was no one who wished to address Council on this item, Councilmember Gillanders moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Councilmember Atkins and unanimously carried. Councilmember Breazeal recalled several cases were approved with a zone variance for 12' and 14' drive- ways. The concept of a 16' driveway was adopted when the Fire Department had special requirements. It is archaic at this time and he could not vote to approve it. Councilmember Gillanders pointed out that the require- ment for 16' driveway is already on the books. What is proposed is to change the number of vehicles served from 5 or more to 6 or more. The 16 foot width evolved when the Fire Department made recommendations for access to apartments. 1 1 1 City Council Minutes - July 18, 1989 - Page 11 Councilmember Atkins stated the 16' driveway is to allow two average -size cars to pass each other. Councilmember Swain moved to send this proposed amend- ment back to the Planning Commission, with perhaps the Traffic Commission's involvement, to determine if the the driveway limits are legitimate:; seconded by Councilmember Breazeal and unanimously carried. Sections 9350 and 9360- An amendment to permit the application of R -1 development standards in instances where an R -2 or R -3 zoned lot is proposed to be im- proved with a single family dwelling. Mayor Froehle declared the public hearing open. As there was no one who wished to speak on this issue, Councilmember Gillanders moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Councilmember Atkins and unani- mously carried. Councilmember Atkins remarked that this particular item came before Council several months ago as a result of a citizen wanting to develop property to R -1 standards. Council and the Planning Commission responded favorably to the request. It's a good amendment and he can support it. Councilmember Swain inquired if this would be recorded as a covenant on the deed so that the property cannot be developed to R -2 or R -3 standards later on down the line. Community Development Director Dawson said this is covered on Page 4, Item B, of Ordinance No. 89 -654. Councilmember Gillanders moved to approve amendment to Sections 9350 and 9360 as summarized above, seconded by Councilmember Atkins and unanimously approved. Councilmember Breazeal moved to approve the Negative Declaration on all above - stated Zoning Code Amendments approved, seconded by Councilmember Swain and unani- mously carried. City Council Minutes - July 18, 1989 - Page 12 D. PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE 89- 653UE, EXTENSION OF URGENCY ORDINANCE 89- 651U -A1 IMPOSING A MORATORIUM CN CERTAIN TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE R -1, R -2 AND R -3 ZONES - City Manager Koski, providing background information, stated that on June 6, 1989, Council adopted an Urgency Ordinance to establish certain Floor Area Ratios and other regulations to control scale and bulk of residential struc- tures. The adopted Urgency Ordinance was modified at Council's June 20, 1989 meeting and will be in effect until July 21st unless it is extended. The ordinance before Council is to extend the Urgency Ordinance for a period of 10 months and 15 days. This extension is necessary to study all aspects of the problem and prepare a Code Amend- ment for Planning Commission consideration. Councilmember Breazeal asked staff if a single family, single story dwelling can be build to a .50 F.A.R. and was told by staff that single story dwellings are excluded. It is only two -story structures affected. Councilmember Swain pointed out these items are proposed study items only and not an ordinance ready for adoption. They are suggestions resulting from a study session and are areas for study. These may not be the actual proposals heard in the public hearing to adopt an ordinance. The issue tonight is should the Urgency Ordinance be extended to allow further study. Mayor Froehle declared the public hearing open. Louis Bald, 9658 Longden, felt the regulations for two - story structures were too restrictive. He explained a project where a client wants to build a two -story structure to allow room for a pool and with a small lot and these restrictions, an adequate size dwelling could not be built. He felt there are enough restrictions on the books now. Kimberly Wallace, 6023 Encinita, told Council she was in the process of finalizing plans for building on a flag lot and along came the moratorium. The proposed new regula- tions will have an impact on the size home she will be able to build. Now she will not be able to build a two -story home, which has more value and will allow more yard space. The potential value of the property will be reduced. She realizes it is important for the City to maintain its image as a beautiful place to live, but not by bankrupting the homeowner in the process. She requested Council to take into consideration the impact this will have on the resi- dents and consider exempting flag lots from the Ordinance. 1 1 1 1 1 City Council Minutes - July 18, 1989 - Page 13 If they cannot exempt flag lots, at least: consider them individually and give special consideration for the houses that are set back from street view. Mr. and Mrs. Andrew Olivas, 9417 Olive, explained to Coun- cil they are in favor of some type of moratorium but it's a conflict for them. They explained their case to Council. They lost their home in the 1987 earthquake and are in the process of building a new home, including the addition of a second story addition over the garage, which will be af- fected by the moratorium. They feel they cannot wait ten months for a decision to be made. Because of Federal regulations, they cannot move into the new home until the garage is completed and they will not be able to build the garage and addition during the moratorium. They have a 1/2 acre lot zoned R -1. Mayor Froehle explained the moratorium was passed when they saw the need to limit the number of large structures being built on small lots. The problem with all moratoriums is who will be exempt. The cutoff is when you take out build- ing permits. We have worked with people and have made modifications to accommodate them. In this case, the plans have not even been submitted. Councilmember Swain stated that it is standard to ask for an extension of 10 months and 15 days. She then asked Community Development Director Dawson when he felt the study period would be over. Mr. Dawson, in reply, stated he felt within the next two months there would be a recommendation from the Planning Commission. This will give them ample time to study dif- ferent ideas and possibilities. They should have a recom- mendation for Council by late September or the beginning of October. Councilmembers Atkins, Breazeal and Swain discussed the fact that this was a very large R -1 zoned lot, they pro- posed to build a second story addition over the garage that would be larger than the garage. They just amended the zoning code prohibiting this and it was questioned as to what this room would become. Would it become a guest house? It was the consensus that this should be presented to the Planning Commission for discussion. City Council Minutes - July 18, 1989 - Page 14 Mayor Froehle, in an effort to clarify the situation, stated his understanding that they can get an occupancy permit even though there is no garage permit. They will be allowed to move into the house. There will be recommenda- tions from the Planning Commission within the next 90 days. This issue cannot be solved this evening. It would be in violation of the Brown Act to discuss this issue any fur- ther. Council recommended Mr. and Mrs. Olivas work with the Planning Department and get on the Planning Commission Agenda. Shirley Seilar appreciated what the City is trying to do about bulk but if this moratorium lasts 10 months, it would be a problem for them. Mayor Froehle reminded her the moratorium addressed pro- posed two story structures and would not affect those close to completion. Richard Dearth, 4533 Clubhouse, Lakewood, said he was in harmony with the general concept of what Council is trying to accomplish but felt it would negatively affect homeown- ers who planned to add on to homes on small lots. Allow- ances should be made for small lots and perhaps at the smaller end of the scale more house should be allowed. As there was no one else who wished to address Council on this issue, Councilmember Gillanders moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Councilmember Atkins and unani- mously carried. Councilmember Atkins stated the issue is whether or not to extend the moratorium to allow time to complete the study. Everyone will have an opportunity in the future for more testimony. He was in favor of extending the moratorium. Councilmember Gillanders felt Council has an obligation to protect all the people in town and that was the original reason behind the moratorium. This is still the principal obligation and he can support the moratorium . extension. Councilmember Breazeal expressed his support for the mora- torium but had the same concern for the owners of small lots as expressed by Mr. Dearth. He felt they should be allowed a .50 F.A.R. one or two story. He did not feel the moratorium would be 60 or 90 days before adopting a final ordinance, but would be of longer duration. 1 1 1 1 1 1 City Council Minutes - July 18, 1989 - Page 15 Councilmember Swain believed extension cf the Urgency ordinance is necessary to study this matter further to prevent homes being built totally out of proportion to the other homes in the neighborhood. The study sessions are open to the public and the opportunity is there for them to express their ideas. Mayor Froehle concurred and felt it was necessary to extend the Urgency Ordinance to allow time to study the issue. Councilmember Atkins moved to adopt Ordinance 89- 653UE, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY EXTENDING ORDINANCE 89- 651U -A1 IMPOSING A MORATORIUM ON CERTAIN DEVELOPMENTS IN THE R -1, R -2 AND R - -3 ZONES OF THE CITY; seconded by Councilmember Gillanders and carried on a roll call vote as follows: ROLL CALL: AYES: Councilmember Atkins, Gillanders, Swain and Froehle NOES: Councilmember Breazeal ABSENT: None 8. COMMUNICATIONS: A. LETTER FROM MAYOR BLANCO OF ALHAMBRA REQUESTING SUPPORT OF COMPLETION OF THE LONG BEACH FREEWAY EXTENSION - Mayor Froehle explained that Council received a letter from Mayor Blanco urging Council to join Alhambra and other cities in supporting the completion of the Long Beach Freeway. To further explain Alhambra's position on this issue, Mayor Froehle invited City Manager Kevin Murphy to address Council. Kevin Murphy, City Manager, Alhambra, stated that the completion of the Long Beach Freeway has bean an issue for 30 years. Because this freeway has not been completed Alhambra is experiencing unbelievable traffic congestion on surface streets. Twenty -four different routes through the City of South Pasadena have been studied and four EIR reports have been prepared. The City of Alhambra believes now is the time to finally complete this leg of the free- way. Mr. Murphy then quoted figures of the number of automobiles using the major north /south streets in Alhambra and stated it is affecting the standard of life in Alhambra. They are trying to consolidate public opinion to complete the freeway. A hearing on this issue is scheduled for some time in October of this year and it must be re- solved. He urged Council to support Alhambra in their efforts to get the freeway completed. City Council Minutes - July 18, 1989 - Page 16 Councilmembers, in discussion of this issue with City Man- ager Murphy, agreed that Alhambra has a legitimate com- plaint but felt South Pasadena was not without a degree of right on their side; they discussed the fact the original proposal would affect historical landmarks; one Council - member expressed his belief he did not feel as a City they should meddle in another City's affairs; they recognized the need for the freeway but suggested appealing to South Pasadena and Cal Trans for the solution, and it was sug- gested perhaps Council could support the Resolution but add a provision to protect the historical landmarks whenever possible. Councilmember Swain moved that Council adopt a Resolution supporting the completion of the Long Beach Freeway through the City of South Pasadena, seconded by Councilmember Breazeal and carried on a roll call vote as follows: ROLL CALL: AYES: Councilmembers Atkins, Breazeal, Swain and Froehle NOES: Councilmember Gillanders ABSENT: None 9. TIME FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO SPEAK: Bobby McGowan, 10137 Lynrose, addressed Council on the issue of completion of the Long Beach Freeway. She told Council they are taking out orange groves, removing scenery and the area is becoming large parking lots. If a freeway through the main part of Temple City was proposed everyone would be up in arms. She did not feel it was Temple City's place to decide an issue for South Pasadena. What if San Gabriel didn't want a freeway and decided to build it through Temple. City. South Pasadena has made it known they do not want their City destroyed and this City did not have the right to go against; the wishes of the people. She felt they should put the pressure on Cal Trans to come up with an alternate plan. After all they have had 30 years. She asked Council to reconsider their vote. Andrew Olivas, 9417 Olive, favored completion of the freeway and stated his unbelief at the amount of traffic and the speed at which vehicles pass through Alhambra on the north /south surface streets. Janice Murasko, 5142 Barela, expressed her anger to Council regarding a Commissioner not being reappointed because of speaking out at a teacher's meeting. This is against the First Amendment rights and wished to hear Council's side of this issue. As a citizen, she felt she has the right to receive an answer on an elected official. 1 1 1 1 1 City Council Minutes - July 18, 1989 - Page 17 Mayor Froehle explained this is a personnel matter and it would be inappropriate to discuss in public. It would not be fair to the person involved. However, if the person involved would contact Council, they would be happy to discuss it with them. Councilmember Gillanders reminded everyone that this was not an Agenda item and, therefore, cannot be discussed. Mayor Froehle called a short recess at 9:20 P.M. Mayor Froehle reconvened the meeting at 9:33 P.M. RECESS TO CRA: At 9:33 P.M. the City Council met as the Temple City Community Redevelopment Agency; approved the Minutes of the regular meeting of June 20, 1989; recessed to a closed Executive Ses- sion to meet with the Agency's negotiator regarding the nego- tiations concerning purchase of properties in Block "A "; adopted Resolution No. CRA 89 -369 setting a public hearing for possible condemnation of selected properties in Block "A" and adopted Resolution No. CRA 89 -370 allowing warrants and demands in the amount of $789,425.37. The Minutes of the Agency are set forth in full in the Agency's records. RECONVENE AS CITY COUNCIL: 10. ACTION ON REQUEST BY CRA: None 11. MATTERS FROM CITY OFFICIALS: A. PURCHASE OF REPLACEMENT CITY VEHICLE FOR CITY MANAGER - As background, City Manager Koski stated quotes have been obtained from several dealerships regarding replacement of the 1984 Mercury station wagon and a new vehicle for the Community Development Director. The Ford Tempo presently driven by the Community Development Director will replace the 1981 Chevrolet station wagon as a staff pool car. Both the 1981 Chevrolet and the 1984 Mercury will be traded in on the purchase of new vehicles. Budgeted funds are avail- able in the 1989 -90 adopted budget. Councilmember Gillanders moved to approve the purchase of the two City vehicles as requested, seconded by Council - member Breazeal and unanimously carried. City Council Minutes - July 18, 1989 - Page 18 B PROPOSED DUES INCREASE - LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES, LOS ANGELES COUNTY DIVISION - As background, City Manager Koski said Council was advised of the proposed dues increase at their regular meeting of April 4, 1989. At that time, the request was deferred until the Los Angeles County Division's 1989 -90 budget was available. The dues have not been revised since 1982; however, increased costs have exceeded the increase in revenue. Staff contacted Jack O'Neil, Executive Director, and requested an explanation for the increase in the 1989- 90 budget. His comments are summarized in staff's memo of July 18, 1989. Councilmember Breazeal said his major concern at the last meeting was the lack of figures as the budget was not available. The increase is moderate and he could support it. Councilmember Swain expressed her support fcr the increase. Councilmember Atkins questioned the value of the organiza- tion to the City, but could go along with the increase. Councilmember Gillanders stated his opposition to the increase. Mayor Froehle questioned the value but realized it's the only game in town. The increase is for $190. Councilmember Breazeal moved to support the increase, seconded by Councilmember Swain and carried on a roll call vote as follows: ROLL CALL: AYES: Councilmember Atkins, Breazeal, Swain and Froehle NOES: Councilmember Gillanders ABSENT: None Mayor Froehle called Council's attention to the Kiwanis Club's 50th Anniversary celebration on August 8, 1989 and suggested perhaps a Resolution could be sent. Because this item is not on the Agenda and because of the time element, Councilmember Swain moved to approve consideration of this as an emergency measure; seconded by Councilmember Gil - landers and unanimously carried. 1 1 1 1 City Council Minutes - July 18, 1989 - Page 19 Councilmember Atkins moved to approve adopting a Resolution in honor of the Kiwanis Club's 50th Anniversary, seconded by Councilmember Breazeal and unanimously carried. Councilmember Breazeal commented on a conference he just at- tended and stated he would be making a written presentation to Council-in the near future. He requested Council's approval to draft a letter in support of SB 1424, which allows business districts to set business improvement zones. He also commented on an article indicating what California cities spend on law enforcement. The lowest law enforcement contract city was Temple City; however, they did not have anything under quality of law enforcement or crime rates. It's all based on money. Councilmember Atkins on this same article on law enforcement figures said in the following issue a letter was written in response to the criticism received and it was admitted the information was very old and shallow. Another article will be written. Councilmember Swain commented on her three -week vacation and - said she was glad to be home. She was tempted, however, by a little town in Missouri by the name of Tightwad. It did have a bank and it was called Tightwad Branch. Councilmember Atkins referred to letter in the Herald Examiner that states his opinion on the smog malarky. As a bit of trivia, of the 31 or 32 cities in the San Gabriel Valley, 15 do not belong to SCAG. Of the 15 that do belong, less than 1/2 pay their dues. Councilmember Gillanders brought Council up -to -date on the Sister City Organization. He is driving up to Portland for a Sister City International luncheon Friday and presentation of the Reader's Digest award won again by Temple City. The Temple City Sister City Organization has won this award twice out of the last three years. It is his understanding Commissioner Walker will be taking the award to Hawkesbury Shire and George Kamachian will take the one to Magdalena. He also remarked that as of July 1, Hawkesbury Shire, N.S.W. is now the City of Hawkesbury. John Horrex, President of the Shire is now Alderman Horrex, Mayor. City Council Minutes - July 18, 1989 - Page 20 12. ADJOURNMENT: At 10:10 P.M. it was moved, seconded and unanimously carried to adjourn. The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on Tuesday, August 1, 1989 at 7:30 P.M. in Council Cham- bers, 5938 North Kauffman Avenue. 1 1 1