HomeMy Public PortalAbout2015 Legislative Final Report201.E
LEGISLATIVE
FINAL REPORT
2015 FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES
LEGISLATIVE ACTION AGENDA
The Action Agenda reflects the priorities of 410 municipalities, as prepared by the Florida League of Cities' five legis-
lative policy committees and adopted by the full membership at the League's 54th Annual Legislative Conference,
November 14, 2014, in Orlando.
Below are the priority statements included in the Action Agenda. For background information and the current status on any
of these issues, please read the Issue Brief available on the Florida League of Cities website.
MUNICIPAL POLICE AND FIREFIGHTER
PENSION REFORM
The Florida League of Cities SUPPORTS legislation that
protects municipalities' home rule powers to set and fund
municipal employee benefit levels, and specifically provides:
comprehensive pension reform, including elim-
ination of the extra benefit requirement;
disability presumption reform; and
a mechanism for municipalities to revoke their
participation in the Florida Retirement System.
The League also SUPPORTS legislation that provides
municipalities with flexibility in the use of insurance
premium taxes, as currently interpreted by the
Department of Management Services.
COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES TAX AND
LOCAL BUSINESS TAX PROTECTION
The Florida League of Cities SUPPORTS legislation
that protects general revenues collected from the com-
munications services tax and the local business tax.
These revenues are used to provide essential munic-
ipal services, such as public safety and constructing
and maintaining roads and bridges, public parks and
open spaces. Maintaining a diversified revenue base
strengthens the fiscal stability of local governments and
improves their ability to serve citizens and businesses.
STORMWATER FEE COLLECTION
The Florida League of Cities SUPPORTS legislation that
clarifies all users of a stormwater utility, including govern-
mental entities, are required to pay stormwater charges to
pay the cost of operation and maintenance of such a utility.
WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY
The Florida League of Cities SUPPORTS legislation
that provides a recurring source of funding for local
government programs and projects that protect wa-
ter resources, improve water quality and quantity,
and expand the use of alternative water sources.
ENTERPRISE ZONES
The Florida League of Cities SUPPORTS legislation
that reauthorizes and improves the Enterprise Zone
program due to sunset on December 31, 2015.
DEVELOPMENTS OF REGIONAL IMPACT
The Florida League of Cities OPPOSES ex-
panding exemptions or repeal of the Develop-
ments of Regional Impact (DRI) process.
TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
The Florida League of Cities SUPPORTS legislation that
preserves local control of transportation planning, provides
equitable transportation funding among municipalities and
counties, and provides opportunities for additional revenue
options for municipal transportation infrastructure projects.
RIDE -FOR -HIRE SERVICES
The Florida League of Cities SUPPORTS legisla-
tion that defines and establishes uniform safety and
insurance standards for transportation network ser-
vices and their independent contractors, and that pre-
serves home rule authority over such services.
HOMELESSNESS
The Florida League of Cities SUPPORTS legisla-
tion that provides a sustainable and dedicated fund-
ing source to deliver training and technical assistance
to programs that offer the necessary support ser-
vices for Florida's homeless individuals and families
and those who are at risk of becoming homeless.
SOBER HOMES
The Florida League of Cities SUPPORTS legislation that
defines and establishes statewide minimum regulatory
standards for properties used for "sober home" purpos-
es and allows for local regulation of such properties.
2015 LEGISLATIVE FINAL REPORT
decision not to renew the program. HEI 33A provides a
process to phase the program out rather than abruptly
ending it at the end of this year. The bill preserves state
incentives for businesses entered into a contract with
the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) be-
tween January 1, 2012, and July 1, 2015, for a project
that is located in an enterprise zone. The bill provides
that these eligible businesses may continue to apply for
certain enterprise zone incentives, if the contract with
the DEO is still deemed active by the department.
The total impact of the bill on municipalities for FY
2015-2016 is estimated to be $1.34 million recur-
ring and $9.28 million nonrecurring. The bill was ap-
proved by the governor on June 16, and became
effective on July 1, 2015, except as otherwise ex-
pressly provided in the act. (Hughes/Cruz)
GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT
SEI 2500A (Appropriations Committee) Is the final ad-
opted budget for state fiscal year 2015-2016. It totaled
approximately $78.7 billion before going to the gov-
ernor. Upon receipt of the bill, the governor vetoed
$461.4 million. The following provides a brief over-
view of issues within the 2015 General Appropriations
Act that may significantly impact municipalities.
Affordable Housing
The budget included $175 million in housing appropria-
tions from the Housing Trust Funds. A total of $70 million
Is allocated to the Florida Housing Finance Corporation
(FHFC), with $48 million of that for the State Apartment
Incentive Loan (SAIL) program, and $10 million for a
competitive grant program for developments designed,
constructed and targeted for persons with developmental
disabilities. The remaining $105 million from the original
$175 million goes to the State Housing Initiatives Part-
nership (SHIP) program. Each local government must
use 20 percent of its SHIP allocation to serve persons
with developmental disabilities. In addition, local govern-
ments are permitted to create regional partnerships across
jurisdictional boundaries through the pooling of appropri-
ated funds to address homeless housing needs identified
in local housing assistance plans. (Sirjane-Samples)
Economic Development
The budget includes $117 million for economic devel-
opment purposes through the funding of Visit Florida at
$74 million and another $43 million for economic in-
centives used to recruit businesses to Florida. (Cruz)
Education
The budget boosts spending for public schools by $780
million and would increase per -student funding by 3 per-
cent, but the increase in public school spending relies on a
nearly $500 million rise In local property taxes. (Hughes)
Environment
Legislators set aside $55 million to acquire conservation
lands but only about $17 million is going to the Florida
Forever program (land acquisition of environmentally en-
dangered or unique lands). There is nearly $50 million for
springs restoration projects and nearly $82 million for Ever-
glades restoration work. The budget also provides approxi-
mately $25 million for beach and dune restoration projects.
Other budget items impacting municipal environmental
programs are:
Grants to local governments for Clean Marina program
— $1.8 million in federal dollars; $300,000 from the
Department of Environmental Protection Grants and
Donations Trust Fund
• $13 million in land management
• $151 million in debt service to Florida Forever program
• $15 million in grants to local governments for Non -Point
Source Management Planning Grants
• $95 million in State Revolving Loan — Drinking Water
Facility Construction
• $190 million In Wastewater Treatment Facility Construc-
tion Loan Program
• $16 million in Small County Wastewater Treatment
Grants
• $110 million in Petroleum Tank Cleanup Program
• $3 million in grants to local governments for solid waste
cleanup
$500,000 in grants for local government brownfields
programs
• $20 million for Kissimmee River restoration
• $15 million for conservation easements
• $13.65 million for dispersed water storage or "water
farming"
(Matthews)
Homelessness
A total of $4 million for Challenge Grants relating to home-
lessness was also included in the budget. The grants will
continue to be administered through the Department of
Children and Families and be available to local homeless-
ness continuums of care for funding to Improve home-
lessness issues in communities around Florida. (Cook)
3 SPECIAL SESSION A: SUMMARY OF BILLS
REGULAR SESSION
MAJOR BILLS THAT PASSED
(listed alphabetically by policy area)
Public Service Commission
CS/HB 7109 (Energy & Utilities) limits the length of time an
appointee to the Public Service Commission can serve to
a total of three consecutive terms. The bill also prohibits a
regulated electric utility from charging a higher rate under
a tiered -rate structure due to an increase in usage attribut-
able to a billing cycle extension. The bill also allows Duke
Energy to finance the shutdown of its Crystal River nuclear
power plant with bonds, rather than passing those costs on
to ratepayers. Effective July 1, 2015. Chapter No. 2015-
129. (Matthews)
Recycled and Recovered Materials
CS/HB 787 (Peters) exempts from liability a person who
sells, transfers or arranges for the transfer of recycled and
recovered materials to a reclamation, recycling or manu-
facturing facility owned by another person for solid waste
released or threatened to be released from the receiving
facility. This legislation applies to causes of action accru-
ing on or after July 1, 2015, and applies retroactively to
causes of action accruing before July 1, 2015, for which a
lawsuit has not been filed. Effective July 1, 2015. Chapter
No. 2015-150. (Matthews)
Confirmation of Auditor General
HCR 8009 (Raulerson) confirms the appointment made by
the Joint Legislative Auditing Committee of Sherrill Foltz
Norman to the position of auditor general. Effective July 1,
2015. (Hughes)
Downtown Development Districts
CS/CS/SB 278 (Diaz de la Portilla) authorizes a municipal-
ity, which has a population of 400,000 or more, is located
in a county with a home rule charter and has created a
downtown development district, to levy ad valorem tax
up to 0.475 mills on all real and personal property in the
district to finance the district's operation. The 0.475 mills
is included within the municipality's regular ad valorem
taxes and special assessments. In total, a municipality's
millage may not exceed the 10 mills allowed under the
Florida Constitution for municipal purposes. Effective July,
1, 2015. Chapter No. 2015-43. (Hughes)
Emergency Fire Rescue Services and Facilities Surtax
CS/CS/HB 209 (Artiles) removes the requirement that the
majority of fire service providers within a county enter into
an interlocal agreement as a prerequisite to a county con-
ducting a referendum enacting the Emergency Fire Rescue
Service and Facilities Surtax. Instead, if a county passes an
ordinance to levy the tax and the measure is approved by the
voters, the proceeds will be distributed based on the average
annual expenditures of ad valorem and non -ad valorem as-
sessments for fire control and emergency fire rescue services
in the preceding five fiscal years. The bill does not remove
the requirement to reduce ad valorem or non -ad valorem fire
assessments by the estimated amount of surtax revenues.
The bill returns any surplus surtax revenues to the county to
redistribute if it cannot be applied to reduce ad valorem or
non -ad valorem assessments levied by the local government
or if the local government declines its share of the revenues.
Effective July, 1, 2015. Chapter No. 2015-169. (Hughes)
Firefighter Pension Plans/Municipal Services Taxing Units
CS/HB 105 (Eagle) authorizes imposition of the insurance
premium tax under Chapter 175, Florida Statutes, within a mu-
nicipal services taxingWi
reement, a
municipality Providesn the taxing
unit. Tservice must be
establi id the county must
levy the revenues generated would be allocated
to the municipalityproviding the fire protection services. Effec-
tive July 1, 2015, pending action by the governor. (Conn)
Florida PrimeyLGIP Fund S
SB 7024 (Governmental Oversight and Accountability)
directs the State Board of Administration to distribute any
residual balance in the Fund B Surplus Funds Trust Fund,
after the original principal balance has been repaid to the
trust fund participants, based on each participant's pro-
portional share of the November 2007 interest earnings
that were withheld from distribution and transferred to the
Fund B Surplus Funds Trust Fund. Effective July, 1, 2015.
Chapter No. 2015-75. (Hughes)
Local Bonds Newsletter
SB 522 (Brandes) deletes the statutory requirement that
the Division of Bond Finance issue a regular newsletter
containing information about local and state bonds. Cur-
rently, the division does not produce the newsletter and all
of the information can be found on its website. Effective
July, 1, 2015, Chapter No. 2015-22. (Hughes)
5 MAJOR BILLS THAT PASSED
Exemption from Legislative Lobbying Gift Ban
SB 984 (Braynon) creates an exemption from the legisla-
tive lobbying requirements or "gift ban," allowing local gov-
emment to facilitate the use of a public facility to a legisla-
tor for a public purpose. For example, facilitating the use of
a city hall for a legislator's town hall meeting. Effective July
1, 2015. Chapter No. 2015-28. (Cruz)
Flood Insurance
CS/CS/CS/SB 1094 (Brandes) gives insurers greater flexi-
bility to offer customized flood insurance policies to replace
those offered by the National Flood Insurance Program.
The bill requires local governments to include development
and redevelopment principles, strategies, and engineering
solutions that reduce flood risks and losses within coastal
areas in their comprehensive coastal management plan.
Effective July 1, 2015. Chapter No. 2015-69. (Cruz)
Growth Management
CSICS/SB 1216 (Simpson) is a comprehensive growth
management package. The bill has provisions that replace
the current Development of Regional Impact (DRI) process
for future large-scale developments with a state -coordinat-
ed review process for comprehensive plan amendments;
dissolve the Withlacoochee Regional Planning Council
(RPC); revise statutory functions of the remaining 10
RPCs; and amend the sector plan process by reducing
certain regulatory reviews. The definition of "blighted" is
also amended to Include areas with sinkhole activities
within a Community Redevelopment Area (CRA). Finally,
the bill creates a 10 -year pilot program in Pasco County
authorizing connected -city corridor comprehensive plan
amendments that can be approved by the county without
state review in certain situations. Effective upon becoming
law. Chapter No. 2015-30. (Cruz)
Municipal Skate Park Liability
SB 408 (Simmons) deletes the requirement that cities and
counties collect written consent from the parents of minors
prior to minors using public skating facilities. Effective July
1, 2015. Chapter No. 2015-48. (Cruz)
Online Voter Registration
CSICS/SB 228 (Clemens) directs the Division of Elections
in the Department of State to develop an operational, on-
line voter registration system by October 1, 2017. The bill
provides an appropriation of $1.8 million in nonrecurring
funds from the Federal Grants Trust Fund to the Depart-
ment of State for the development and implementation of
the online voter registration system. Effective July 1, 2015.
Chapter No. 2015-36. (Cruz)
Private Property Rights
CSICS/CS/HB 383 (Edwards) creates a new cause of action
within the Bert Hams Act for a "prohibited exaction." Based
on a recent U.S. Supreme Court case, prohibited exaction is
defined in the legislation as a permitting condition imposed
by a governmental entity on a property owner's proposed use
of real property that lacks an essential nexus to a legitimate
public purpose and Is not roughly proportionate to the harm
the governmental entity seeks to avoid, minimize or mitigate.
Amendments to CS/CS/CS/HB 383 narrowed the scope of
damages and attorney fees provisions. The legislation in-
cludes a waiver of sovereign immunity for these new causes
of action, which could have a large fiscal impact on cities. The
bill does contain some favorable provisions to local govem-
ments, including limiting who has a cause of action under the
Bert Hams Act, creating greater flexibility to settle Bert Harris
lawsuits at any time during litigation, and specifying that the
act of a county adopting FEMA floodplain maps is not action-
able under Bert Hams. Effective October 1, 2015. Chapter
No. 2015-142. (Cruz)
Affordable Housing
SR 174 (Joyner) recognized April 2015 as "Fair Housing
Month" in Florida. The bill encouraged state and local gov-
ernment leaders, communities and Individuals to observe
the month through ceremonies and activities celebrating
historical and future efforts to ensure fair and equal access
to housing for all Floridians. SR 174 was adopted by the
Legislature. (Sir)ane-Samples)
Disabled Parking
CS/HB 471 (DuBose) prohibits a county, municipality or
any other agency from charging a parking fee for vehi-
cles displaying a disabled parking permit in a facility or lot
providing timed parking spaces. Effective July 1, 2015.
Chapter No. 2015-114. (Sidane-Samples)
Disabled Parking Permits
CS/SB 132 (Joyner) prohibits the Department of Highway
Safety and Motor Vehicles from requiring a veteran who
has been previously evaluated and certified by the U.S.
Department of Veterans Affairs as permanently and totally
disabled from a service -connected disability to resubmit a
certificate of disability in order to renew his or her disabled
parking permit. Effective July 1, 2015. Chapter No. 2015-
11. (Sidane-Samples)
MAJOR BILLS THAT PASSED
bill requires that the contractor's response to a notice of
claim Indicate whether he or she is willing to make repairs,
settle the claim with a monetary offer, or both, whether the
contractor disputes the claim, or whether the contractor's
insurer will cover the claim. Effective October 1, 2015.
Chapter No. 2015-165. (Matthews)
Controlled Substances
CS/HB 897 (Ingram) adds several synthetic cannabinoids
to Schedule I of Florida's controlled substances schedules.
Effective upon becoming law. Chapter No. 2015-34. (Cook)
Local Preferences
CS/CS/SB 778 (Hays) preempts local preference ordinances
if 50 percent or more of the public construction project is paid
for with state -appropriated funds. The bill define "state -ap-
propriated funds" to mean only those funds appropriated in
the General Appropriations Act, excluding federal funds. Only
those state -appropriated funds received by the city at the
time of the bid are to count toward the percentage of state
funds used to pay for the project. The bill also requires cities
to disclose on the bid document whether or not the local
construction preference applies to the project, instead of list-
ing the percentage of state funds used to pay for the project
on every bid document, regardless of whether or not state
funds were used to pay for the project. Effective July 1, 2015.
Chapter No. 2015-63. (Cook)
Pain Management Clinics
SB 450 (Benacquisto) reenacts current law to the regula-
tion of pain management clinics. The current resolutions
were scheduled to sunset on January 1, 2016. Effective
upon becoming law. Chapter No. 2015-49. (Cook)
Residential Master Building Permits
CSIHB 1151 (Ingoglia) requires local governments to
create, if requested, a master building permit program to
expedite the approval of building permits for contractors
constructing multiple, identical single family and townhome
structures. The bill allows local governments to establish
reasonable fees for the creation of the program, as well as
the permit fees that will be charged. Effective July 1, 2015.
Chapter No. 2015-156. (Matthews)
Sober Homes
CS/CS/HB 21 (Hager) requires the Department of Chil-
dren and Families (DCF) to create a voluntary certification
program for recovery residences, also referred to as "sober
homes." DCF must approve one or more credentialing enti-
ties for developing and administering the voluntary certifica-
tion program. Among other requirements, this entity must:
establish recovery residence certification requirements;
monitor and inspect recovery residences to ensure
compliance;
• interview and evaluate residents, employees and volun-
teer staff on their knowledge and application of certifi-
cation requirements;
provide training for owners, managers and staff; and
• develop a code of ethics.
The bili requires a Level 2 background screening of the
owners, directors and chief financial officers. Certification
must be renewed annually. The bill establishes penalties for
recovery residences that advertise as a "certified recovery
residence" without first securing this designation. The bill
prohibits recovery residence operators convicted of cer-
tain crimes from achieving certification. The bill requires
the credentialing entity to submit a list of certified recovery
residences to DCF by April 1, 2016, and to notify the de-
partment within three business days when a new residence
is certified or a residence's certificate has expired or been
revoked. The bill also prohibits licensed treatment facilities
from referring patients to non -certified sober homes. Effeo-
live July 1, 2015. Chapter No. 2015-100. (Cook)
Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP)
CS/SB 1312 (Simmons) adds protection of "free speech
in connection with public issues" to the anti-SLAPP suit
statute. The bill defines the term "free speech in connec-
tion with public issues" as any written or oral statement
that is protected under applicable law and is made before
a governmental entity in connection with an issue under
consideration or review by a governmental entity; or In
connection with a play, movie, television program, radio
broadcast, audiovisual work, book, magazine article,
musical work, news report or other similar work. It includes
a person in the prohibition against bringing a SLAPP suit
and in the provisions for expedited resolution of a lawsuit
claimed to be a SLAPP suit. Effective July 1, 2015. Chap-
ter No. 2015-70. (Conn)
ricket Quotas
CS/SB 264 (Bradley) prohibits a law enforcement agency
from establishing a traffic citation quota. If a law enforce-
ment agency receives more than 33 percent of the total
revenues it incurs within the fiscal year from traffic cita-
tions, the agency must submit a report to the Legislative
Auditing Committee detailing its total revenue from traffic
citations and its total expenses for law enforcement. This
report must be submitted within six months after the end
of the fiscal year. Effective July 1, 2015. Chapter No.
2015-15. (Cook)
9 MAJOR BILLS THAT PASSED
Trust Fund. Additionally, the bill would have eliminated the
current distribution to various trust funds currently receiving
documentary stamp tax distributions, including the Ecosys-
tem Management and Restoration Trust Fund, Water Man-
agement Lands Trust Fund, Conservation and Recreation
Lands Trust Fund, General Inspection Trust Fund, Invasive
Plant Control Trust Fund, State Game Trust Fund, and Wa-
ter Quality Assurance Trust Fund. The bill also would have
terminated a number of existing trust funds including the
Department of Environmental Protection's Florida Commu-
nities Trust Fund, Florida Preservation 2000 and others. The
bill died on the House floor. (Matthews)
Implementation of the Water and Land Conservation
Constitutional Amendment
CS/SB 584 (Dean) would have established the Land
Acquisition Trust Fund (LATF) and conformed changes in
law to allow for the constitutional amendment on water and
land conservation to be implemented. The bill also would
have terminated multiple trust funds within the Department
of Environmental Protection, the Department ofAgricul-
ture and Consumer Services, and the Florida Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission and mandated that any
outstanding debts or obligations of the trust funds that are
deleted be paid through the LATF. The bill passed both
chambers, but died in returning messages. (Matthews)
Implementation of the Water and Land Conservation
Constitutional Amendment
CS/CS/CS/SB 586 (Dean) would have revised the statuto-
ry distributions of revenues derived from the excise tax on
documents to satisfy the recently enacted water and land
conservation constitutional amendment, otherwise known
as Amendment 1. The bill would have required the Land
Acquisition Trust Fund (LATF) to receive 33 percent of net
revenues from the excise tax on documents. It also would
have required payment of debt service for Florida Forever
and Everglades bonds from the LATF, and deleted existing
distributions to trust funds that serve environmental pur-
poses. The bill died on the Senate floor. (Matthews)
Land Application of Septage
CS/HB 687 (Drake) and CS/SB 648 (Evers) would have
repealed the current prohibition of the land application of
septage, which is currently set to take effect on January
1, 2016, and would have required certain conditions to be
met in order to apply septage. If septage was to be ap-
plied to land in springs protection and management zones,
those areas would be subject to monthly inspections by the
Department of Health (DOH), sampling, metered receiving
at treatment facilities and annual tracking of nutrient loads.
If the area of application was not a spring protection or
management zone, the bills would have required quarterly
inspections by DOH. CS/HB 687 passed the House, but
died awaiting action by the Senate. CS/SB 648 died in
committee. (Matthews)
11
Legislative Ratification —Air Pollutants
CS/HB 849 (Wood) and SB 1076 (Gibson) would have re-
quired the Department of Environmental Protection to sub-
mit to the Legislature a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
relating to standards of performance for existing sources
of air pollutants, as required by the Federal Clean Air Act.
The bills would have required that the SIP be ratified by
the Florida Legislature before being sent to the U.S. Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency for approval. The bills died in
committee. (Matthews)
Local Government Services
HB 337 (Mayfield) and SB 442 (Altman) would have al-
lowed a county, upon expiration of a franchise agreement
or interlocal agreement, to provide water, wastewater, re-
claimed water or natural gas service to the unincorporated
area that was previously served by the municipality. The
bills would have also prohibited municipalities from extend-
ing or executing their corporate powers outside of their
boundaries and into the unincorporated area without the
express consent of the board of county commissioners.
The prohibition of extension of corporate powers was pro-
spective in nature. The bills died in committee. (Matthews)
Municipal Power Regulation
HB 773 (Mayfield) would have changed the definition of a
"public utility" to include utilities that are members of the
Florida Municipal Power Agency (FMPA). There are cur-
rently 31 municipal utilities that are members of the FMPA.
By designating the members of FMPA as public utilities,
the Public Service Commission would have regulatory
authority over those utilities. The bill died in committee.
(Matthews)
Natural Gas Rebate Program
CS/CS/CS/HB 1141 (Ray) and CS/CSISB 1538 (Simpson)
would have created the Heavy Transportation Industry Natu-
ral Gas Rebate Program within the Department of Agricul-
ture and ConsumerAffairs (DACS). The rebate program
would have attempted to reduce transportation costs in the
state by encouraging freight mobility investments in natural
gas vehicles or fleets. The maximum rebate an applicant
could have received was $500,000 per vehicle, up to a total
of $1 million per fiscal year. The bills would have appropriat-
ed $10 million in recurring funds, beginning with FY 2015-
2016 through FY 2019-2020, from the General Revenue
Fund to DACS. The bills also would have required the Office
of Program Policy Analysis and GovemmentAccountabil-
ity to submit a report reviewing the rebate program to the
governor, House speaker and Senate president by January
31, 2017. CS/CS/CS/HB 1141 passed the House, but died
awaiting action by the Senate. CS/CS/SB 1538 died on the
Senate floor. (Matthews)
MAJOR BILLS THAT FAILED
Water Resources
SB 1408 (Evers) would have encouraged the conservation
of water by prohibiting the water management district from
modifying the consumptive use permit of a water user if
the actual water use was less than the permitted water use
due to documented implementation of water conservation
measures. The bill died in committee. (Matthews)
Water Supply Planning and Oversight
SB 1436 (Gibson) would have created the Florida State-
wide Water Oversight and Planning Council. The council's
mission was to advise the Legislature in determining the
best approach to prevent or minimize damage from floods,
protect and enhance the natural system of floodplains,
and improve and protect the quality of surface and ground
water. The council would have also created a five-year,
10 -year and 20 -year water forecasting plan for the State of
Florida. The bill died in committee. (Matthews)
Water and Wastewater
CS/SB 776 (Hays) and CS/HB 1173 (Porter) mandated the
Division of Bond Finance of the State Board of Adminis-
tration to review the allocation of private activity bonds to
determine the availability of additional allocation of bonds
for water and wastewater infrastructure projects. The bills
also would have exempted investor-owned utilities from the
state sales tax. The bills died in committee. (Matthews)
Well Stimulation Treatments
HB 169 (Jenne) would have prohibited well stimulation
treatments used for the exploration or production of oil or
natural gas in Florida effective October 1, 2015. The bill
died in committee. (Matthews)
Ad Valorem Taxation
SJR 1142 (D. Gaetz) proposed an amendment to the
Florida Constitution that would have expanded the authority
of the Legislature to regulate ad valorem taxes. Under the
amendment, the Legislature could have prohibited increas-
es in the assessed value of a person's homestead when
the market value of the homestead is decreasing, which
is also known as the "Recapture Rule" of the Save Our
Homes benefit. This joint resolution authorized the ex-
pansion of the Save Our Homes property tax assessment
benefit for homestead properties. If approved by voters
and implemented, the resolution would have shifted the
property tax burdens from homestead properties onto other
properties and was estimated to have a recurring negative
fiscal impact on local governments of $128.7 million. The
joint resolution died in committee. (Hughes)
Communications Services Taxes — Rate Reduction
CSICS/SB 110 (Hukill) would have reduced the state portion of
the communications services tax (CST) rates by 3.6 percent,
which would have reduced the general state rate from 6.65 to
3.05 percent and the rate on direct -to -home satellite from 10.8
to 7.2 percent. This bill did not reduce the rate or anticipated
revenues collected from the local CST levied by cities and coun-
ties. The bill included a "hold harmless" provision that protected
local governments by modifying the revenue sharing distribution
formulas to offset the negative recurring impact caused by the
reduction in revenues shared with local governments. The bill
would have allowed communications services dealers to report
tax collections on a non -calendar month basis and clarified
that when a dealer remits a portion of CST collections late, the
dealer loses its collection allowance only for the late portion of
the payment. This language was also included in HB 7141 (see
page16), which was the House Tax Reform Plan. CS/CS/SB
110 and HB 7141 died in committee. (Hughes)
Deferred Compensation
CS/SB 1352 (Smith) would have prohibited contracts with in-
vestment providers and record keepers for local government
deferred compensation programs from exceeding a five-year
term. The bill specified requirements for the competitive
solicitation or bidding process for investment providers and
record keepers. The bill would have required the administra-
tor of a local deferred compensation program to comply with
specified fiduciary standards and authorized the creation of
an oversight committee to evaluate the performance of the
plan administrator. The bill died In committee. (Conn)
Discrimination In Employment Screening
SB 214 (Clemens) and HB 977 (Powell) would have pro-
hibited an employer from inquiring into or considering an
applicant's criminal history on an initial employment appli-
cation unless required to do so by law. An employer could
have inquired into or considered an applicant's criminal
history only after the applicant's qualifications had been
screened and the employer had determined that the appli-
cant met the minimum employment requirements for the
position. Both bills died in committee. (Conn)
False Homestead Claims
SB 1508 (Margolis) would have authorized the property ap-
praiser to contract for services to audit homestead tax exemp-
tions claimed on assessment rolls and allowed contractors to
be paid from penalties. Property owners falsely claiming a
homestead exemption were authorized to enter into a pay-
ment plan, and a tax lien based on a false homestead claim
would be collected in the same manner as, and in addition to,
the current ad valorem taxes. The bill would have deleted the
provision restricting governmental entities from contracting for
certain services regarding the collection of unpaid taxes. The
bill was withdrawn from consideration. (Hughes)
13
MAJOR BILLS THAT FAILED
Property TaxAssessments
HB 417 (Wood) amended the definitions of "Fair market val-
ue" and "just value" for the purposes of assessment of prop-
erty for property taxes. The bill died in committee. (Hughes)
Property Tax— Exempt Use
CS/CS/SB 924 (Hays) and CS/HB 839 (Burton) clarified
the current exemption from ad valorem taxation for exempt
purposes, such as religious, educational and charitable
organizations, by requiring the property owner to take affir-
mative steps to ready the property for the exempt purpose.
The bills died in committee. (Hughes)
Property Tax Exemptions
HB 173 (Goodson) would have increased the property tax
exemption from $500 to $5,000 for residents who are widows,
widowers, blind or totally and permanently disabled. This
language was also included in HB 7141 (see page 16), the
House Tax Reform Plan. The bill died in messages. (Hughes)
Property Tax— Exemption for Deployed Servicemembers
CS/SB 7052 (Military and Veterans Affairs, Space, and Do-
mestic Security) would have updated the designated oper-
ations for which deployed service members may qualify for
an additional ad valorem tax exemption. This language was
also included in HB 7141 (see page 16), the House Tax Re-
form Plan. CS/SB 7052 died in House messages. (Hughes)
Property Tax: Renewable Energy Devices
CS/SJR 400 (Grandes) and HJR 865 (R. Rodrigues) pro-
posed an amendment to the Florida Constitution to require
the Legislature, by general law, to exempt the assessed
value of a renewable energy device from tangible person-
al property tax and the installation of those devices from
determining the assessed value of real property, both res-
idential and nonresidential, for the purpose of ad valorem
taxation. The joint resolutions died in committee. (Hughes)
Public Depositories
HB 907 (Hager) and SB 1154 (Garcia) would have expand-
ed the definition of "qualified public depositary" to include
credit unions as entities that are qualified to take public
deposits. The bills died in committee. (Hughes)
Report of Tax Incentives
SB 122 (Margolis) would have required the Office of Eco-
nomic and Demographic Research to prepare an annual
state tax incentive revenue report. SB 122 was withdrawn
from consideration. (Hughes)
Sales Tax Exemption — Manufacturing Equipment
SB 316 (Hukill) would have made permanent the existing
temporary exemption from the sales and use tax for certain
purchases of industrial machinery and equipment. The bill
also would have removed existing limitations of the exemp-
tion. The current exemption is set to expire in 2017. SB 316
was withdrawn from consideration. (Hughes)
Sales Tax on Commercial Leases
SB 140 (Hukill) would have reduced the sales and use tax
that is levied on the rental or license fees charged for real
property from 6 to 5 percent. The estimated fiscal impact to
local government was approximately $31.5 million. The House
Tax Cut Plan, HB 7141 (see page 16), included a reduction
of 0.2 percent, from 6 to 5.8 percent, on the rent charged for
commercial leases. SB 140 died in committee. (Hughes)
Sales Tax on Commercial Leases
HB 245 (Ahem) would have provided exemptions from the tax
imposed on rental or license fees charged for commercial real
property. Beginning January 1, 2016, the first $10,000 of total
rent would have been exempt from the sales tax and each
subsequent year, an additional $10,000 of total rent would be
exempt. The bill died in committee. (Hughes)
Sales Tax Exemption— Original Works of Art
HB 89 (Richardson) and SB 188 (Margolis) would have ex-
empted specific original works of art from the sales and use
tax. HB 89 died in committee, and SB 188 was withdrawn
from consideration. (Hughes)
Sales Tax Exemption — Rental Commercial Property
SB 1368 (J. Latvala) would have exempted common area
maintenance charges that are separately stated in a lease
agreement and do not exceed 5 percent of the base rent
amount from the sales tax that is charged on the rental of
commercial property. The bill died in committee. (Hughes)
Small Business Saturday Sales Tax Holiday
CS/HB 259 (Fant) and CS/CS/SB 384 (Garcia) would have
created a one -day sales tax holiday on Saturday, Novem-
ber 28, 2015. During the holiday, purchases of certain items
sold at small business would have been exempted from
the state sales tax and county discretionary sales surtaxes.
The bills died in committee. (Hughes)
15
MAJOR BILLS THAT FAILED
Value Adjustment Board
CS/CS/HB 695 (Avila) and CS/CS/SB 972 (Flores) would
have amended multiple provisions relating to Value Adjustment
Boards (VABs), including specifying who could represent a prop-
erty owner at a hearing and requiring the petition to be signed
by the taxpayer or accompanied by written authorization to
represent a taxpayer. CS/CS/HB 695 would have modified
the composition of the VAB board from two county commis-
sioners, one school board member and two citizen mem-
bers to five citizen members nominated by the legislative
delegation and appointed by the governor. The bills died in
messages. (Hughes)
Agritourism
CS/HB 569 (Combee) and SB 594 (Stargel) would have
prohibited local governments from enforcing ordinances
relating to agritourism on agricultural lands. CS/HB 569
passed the House, but died awaiting action by the Senate.
SB 594 died on the Senate floor. (Cruz)
Community Contribution Tax Credit Program
CS/SB 302 (Simpson) and HB 311 (Ingoglia) would have
extended the expiration date applicable to the granting of
the community contribution tax credit against the sales and
use tax, corporate income tax and insurance premium tax for
contributions and donations to eligible sponsors of revital-
ization and housing projects approved by the Department of
Economic Opportunity. The bills died in committee. (Cruz)
Community Redevelopment Agency
SB 752 (Hukill) would have exempted certain hospital
districts that levy ad valorem taxes from paying increment
revenue funds to any new community redevelopment
agency (CRA) established after July 1, 2015. The bill died
in committee. (Cruz)
Constrained Agricultural Parcels
SB 1244 (Dean) and HB 1175 (Hutson) would have autho-
rized, under limited circumstances, a process for the owner of
unincorporated, undeveloped parcels of land previously used
for agricultural purposes to apply for a comprehensive plan
amendment to develop the parcel, despite local government
objections. To be eligible, at least one mile of the parcel's
boundary would have to be adjacent to existing commercial,
industrial or residential uses and the parcel could not exceed
6,400 acres. The bills died in committee. (Cruz)
Department of Economic Opportunity Website
HB 75 (Combee) and SB 232 (Hays) would have autho-
rized the Department of Economic Opportunity to request
comprehensive data from cities in order to create a web -
page to disseminate this information to businesses looking
to expand or move into the state. The information request-
ed would have included millage rates, local business taxes,
sign ordinances, landscaping ordinances and more. The
bills did not designate a funding source for cities to comply
with these requirements. The bills died in committee. (Cruz)
Development of Regional Impact
SB 562 (Simpson) and HB 579 (M. Gaetz) would have
required any future large-scale development currently ap-
proved through the Development of Regional Impact (DRI)
process to be approved through a comprehensive plan
amendment requiring state -coordinated review. In doing so,
the legislation would have curtailed the current DRI process
in which regional planning councils play a role in providing
technical assistance in the planning of a project, including
making recommendations on how to address extra -juris-
dictional traffic impacts caused by a DRI. The substance
of these bills was amended into CS/SB 1216 (see page 7),
which passed the Legislature. SB 562 and HB 879 died in
committee. (Cruz)
Economic Development — House Package
CS/HB 7067 (Economic Development & Tourism) was a
200 -plus page comprehensive economic development
package. Of specific concern to municipalities were provi-
sions dealing with enterprise zones, impact fees and permit
extensions. Specifically, the bill would have authorized
local governments to create local enterprise zones in which
newly established or expanding businesses were exempt
from local business taxes, impact fees, building permit
fees, all local special assessments, sign ordinances, tree
ordinances, and for 24 months could not issue a citation
or civil code ordinance violation on any business located
within the zone, unless the violation related to health and
safety. The bill would have prohibited local governments
from imposing impact fees on small businesses of 12 or
fewer employees for buildings less than 6,000 square feet.
This impact fee provision was amended on the House
floor to prohibit local governments from exercising a super
majority vote provision to reinstate these impact fees if they
regulate "transportation network companies" (Uber). Last,
the bill would have extended for another two years the
expiration of permits issued by the Department of Envi-
ronmental Protection or a water management district and
local government Issued development orders and building
permits. This would have been the fifth time since the 2009
legislative session that these permit expiration dates have
been extended. The bill passed the House, but died await-
ing action by the Senate. (Cruz)
11 IF/
MAJOR BILLS THAT FAILED
Impact Fees
SB 850 (Hays) and HB 923 (Costello) would have autho-
rized local governments to impose a discretionary sur-
charge on the documentary stamp tax for financing capital
improvements, in lieu of charging impact fees. The discre-
tionary surcharge could not have exceeded the rate of $1
for each $100. The discretionary surcharge would have
been created by a local option ordinance. The legislation
would have prohibited a local government from collecting
impact fees if it opted to receive the discretionary surcharge
for the same purpose. The bills died in committee. (Cruz)
Improvements to Real Property Damaged by
Sinkhole Activity
SB 404 (Simpson) and HB 973 (Rabum) would have
declared there is a compelling state interest in enabling
property owners to voluntarily finance certain improvements,
with local governmental assistance, to property damaged by
sinkhole activity. The bills would have authorized local gov-
ernments to voluntarily assist property owners in the financ-
ing of improvements necessary to repair property damaged
by sinkhole activity, subject to local ordinance through an
expansion of the PACE program. Additionally, the bills would
have expanded the definition of "blighted area," enabling
community redevelopment areas to enter into voluntary
contracts to redevelop properties damaged by sinkhole ac-
tivity. The provision expanding the definition of blighted was
amended to CS/SB 1216 (see page 7), which passed the
Legislature. SB 404 and HB 973 died in committee. (Cruz)
Inspectors General
CS/HB 1283 (Rader) and SB 1412 (Evers) would have
required the chief inspector general (CIG) to publish, on the
website of the governor, final investigative reports performed
by the CIG or received from an agency inspector general. The
legislation would have required an agency inspector general
to publish final investigative reports, including all responses
and rebuttals, on the agency's website and to provide a copy
to the CIG for publication on the website of the governor. In
addition, the legislation would have required a unit of local
government to publish on its website the final investigative
report by an inspector general prepared for, or on behalf of,
the unit of local government within 10 days after finalizing the
report, except if the investigation was confidential or otherwise
exempt from disclosure. The bills died in committee. (Cruz)
Online Voter Registration and City Elections by Mail
HB 1161 (Passidomo) would have required the Department
of State to create an online voter registration system in
2018, after the next presidential election. In addition, the bill
would have provided that cities could conduct mail elec-
tions. The bill died in committee. (Cruz)
Private Property Rights
HB 551 (Perry) and SB 1424 (Evers) would have required
local governments to adopt private property rights elements
in their comprehensive plans and required all land devel-
opment regulations to be consistent with the property rights
element. The bills died in committee. (Cruz)
Public -Private Partnerships
CS/HB 63 (Steube) and CS/CS/CS/SB 824 (Evers) would
have amended the statutory framework that local govem-
ments must adhere to when engaging in public-private part-
nerships (P3s). The legislation would have provided supple-
mental authority to local governments, therefore allowing cities
to rely on Home Rule authority to enter into P3 agreements
or follow the process in Florida statutes. Lastly, the legislation
would have authorized local governments to collect a fee, as
determined by local ordinance, to cover the costs associated
with reviewing unsolicited proposals. CS/HB 63 died in com-
mittee. CS/CS/CS/SB 824 died on the Senate floor. (Cruz)
Public Records Exemption for Public -Private Partnerships
CS/HB 65 (Steube) and CS/SB 826 (Evers) would have
created a temporary public records exemption for unsolic-
ited public-private partnership proposals received by local
governments. The bills were designed to protect the work
product of the private entity submitting the original unsolicit-
ed proposal, which could be copied and undercut when the
local government uses a competitive bid process to award
the contract. CS/HB 65 died on the House floor. CS/SB 826
died on the Senate floor. (Cruz)
Qualified Television Revolving Loan Fund
SB 196 (Bean) and CS/HB 237 (C. Latvala) would have
created the "Qualified Television Revolving Loan Fund"
(QTV Fund) within the Department of Economic Opportu-
nity. The QTV Fund would have been administered as a
public-private partnership, loaning a combination of state
and private funds to qualified television productions at low
to no interest rates. SB 196 died in committee. CS/HB 237
died on the House floor. (Cruz)
Regional Planning Councils
CS/CS/SB 484 (Simpson) and HB 873 (Mayfield) as
originally filed would have removed regional planning
councils (RPCs) from statute and assigned many of the
duties fulfilled by RPCs to counties and water management
districts. The bills were subsequently amended to dissolve
only the Withlacoochee Regional Planning Council, as well
as remove some statutory responsibilities of RPCs. The
substance of this bill was amended into CS/SB 1216 (see
page 7), which passed the Legislature. CS/CS/SB 484 and
HB 873 died in committee. (Cruz)
19
MAJOR BILLS THAT FAILED
Charter Schools — School Choice
SB 720 (Ring) would have required a person or officer of an
entity that submitted a charter school application to undergo
background screening and would have prohibited a sponsor
from approving a charter school application until the comple-
tion and receipt of the results of the screening. In addition, the
bill would have required a charter school application to provide
evidence of accreditation, would have revised the deadline by
which a charter school must have a certificate of occupancy or
temporary certificate of occupancy, and would have required
that approval of a charter be based on documentation of
adequate financial resources to support the charter school's
operation. The bill died in committee. (Sirjane-Samples)
Department of Transportation
SB 7054 (Appropriations) would have redirected the portion
of the $225 additional fee imposed on initial registration of
motor vehicles (referred to as the "New Wheels Fee") that
is currently deposited into the General Revenue Fund to the
State Transportation Trust Fund (STTF). In addition, the bill
specified how the revenues from this fee were to be used by
the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT): $25 million
Florida Shared -Use Nonmotorized Trail Network; 3.4 percent
($7.1 million) New Starts Transit Program; 5 percent ($10.2
million) Small County Outreach Program; 20.6 percent ($42.5
million) Florida Strategic Intermodal System; 6.9 percent
($14.2 million) and all remaining funds could have been used
for any transportation purpose authorized by law. The bill
would have created the Florida Shared -Use Nonmotorized
Trail (SunTrail) network and would have required FDOT to
annually allocate $50 million for the SunTrail network in the
FDOT work program. The bill passed the Senate and the
House, but died in returning messages. (Sirjane-Samples)
Department of Transportation
CS/CS/HB 7039 (Transportation and Ports) would have
removed the ability of municipalities and counties to charge a
developer for removing vegetation within the right-of-way limits
of road improvements for which the developer completed or
contributed funding as required under transportation concur-
rency for a development project. Each municipality or county
could have, by a majority vote of its governing body, exempt
itself from this provision of the bill. Lastly, the bill would have
increased the minimum amount transferred to the Florida Sea-
port Transportation and Economic Development Program from
$15 million to $25 million. The bill passed the House, but died
awaiting action by the Senate. (Sirjane-Samples)
Gaming — Campaign Contributions
SB 116 (Margolis) would have created the "Public Confi-
dence in Gaming Act," prohibiting applicants for and permit
holders of pari-mutuel permits from making contributions
to certain election campaigns. The bill was withdrawn from
consideration. (Sirjane-Samples)
Gaming — Constitutional Amendment
HB 1239 (Young) would have attempted to amend the state
constitution by allowing the electors of the state to approve
or reject the expansion of gambling and proposed a con-
stitutional amendment to be voted on at the next general
election or at an earlier special election specifically autho-
rized by law for that purpose. The bill did not limit the right
of the Legislature to exercise its authority through general
law to restrict, regulate or tax any gambling activity. In
addition, it did not limit the authority of the state to negoti-
ate a tribal -state compact under the federal Indian Gaming
Regulatory Act or to affect any existing tribal -state compact.
The bill died in committee. (Sirjane-Samples)
Gaming — Destination Resort Trust Fund
HB 1237 (Young) would have created the Destination Resort
Trust Fund within the Department of Gaming Control for
the deposit of application and licensing fees of destination
resorts and any other funds as provided by law. The money
in the trust fund would have been used by the Department of
Gaming Control and the Department of Law Enforcement for
the regulation of limited gaming, investigations, enforcement
and the review of applications and background investigations
of applicants. The bill died in committee. (Sirjane-Samples)
Gaming — Gaming Control Commission/
Department of Gaming Control
CS/CS/HB 1233 (Young) would have created the Gaming
Control Commission. The commission would have regulated
pari-mutuels, amusements games or machines, historical
racing or historical racing systems, greyhound racing, jai
alai frontons, destination resorts and the associated fees
and taxes. The bill would have directed the Department
of Gaming Control to adopt rules relating to the Gaming
Compact between the Seminole Tribe of Florida and the
State of Florida. The Division of Pari-mutuel Wagering and
the Pari-mutuel Wagering Trust Fund within the Department
of Business and Professional Regulation would have been
transferred to the Department of Gaming Control. The bill
would have preempted the regulation of gaming at a "desti-
nation resort" to the state and would have required a waiver
of sovereign immunity for certain entities. In addition, the bill
would have restricted the awarding of resort licenses and
would have authorized the Department of Gaming Control to
limit gaming and issue licenses for a limited number of des-
tination resorts. The bill died in committee. (Sirjane-Samples)
Gaming — Online Ticket Sales
SB 120 (Margolis) would have authorized the Department of
Lottery to create and administer a program that provided for
the sale of Florida lottery tickets through the Intemet. The bill
was withdrawn from consideration. (Sidane-Samples)
21 MAJOR BILLS THAT FAILED
Transportation — Vulnerable Users
CS/CSICS/HB 231 (Passidomo) and CSICS/SB 908 (Al-
tman) would have broadly defined a "vulnerable user" to
include any pedestrian; bicyclist; motorcyclist; skateboard-
ers; person operating farm equipment; a person riding an
animal; or a person operating an electric personal assis-
tive mobility device or a wheelchair. The bills would have
established enhanced penalties for drivers endangering
vulnerable users. CS/CS/CS/HB 231 was substituted for
CS/CSISB 908. CS/CS/SB 908 died on the Senate floor.
(Sirjane-Samples)
Transportation — TNC's Vehicle -Miles Traveled Study
CS/CS/HB 7075 (Transportation and Ports) and CSISB
1186 (Brandes) would have authorized a public transit pro-
vider to enter into an agreement with a transportation net-
work company (TNC) under which the company provides
public transit service. CSISB 1186 would have required
the Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged and
the Center for Urban Transportation Research to coopera-
tively develop and implement a pilot program and provide
a report to assess the potential for increasing accessibility
and cost effectiveness of providing transportation to certain
transportation disadvantaged individuals through the use
of a TNC. The center would have also been directed to
conduct a study, establish a pilot project and provide a
report regarding the feasibility and means of implementing
a vehicle -miles -traveled funding mechanism for transpor-
tation projects. CS/CS/HB 7075 previously included the
vehicle -miles -traveled study and the transportation disad-
vantaged pilot program but these provisions were removed.
CS/SB 1186 would have authorized Escambia and Santa
Rosa counties to the Northwest Florida Regional Transpor-
tation Finance Authority. Lastly, CS/SB 1186 would have
created the Shared -use Nonmotortzed Trail (Sun Trail)
Network as a component of the Florida Greenways and
Trail System. CS/CS/HB 7075 passed the House but died
awaiting action by the Senate. CS/SB 1186 died in commit-
tee. (Sirjane-Samples)
Transportation — Transfer of Funds
SB 1456 (Latvala) would have required that a minimum of
$25 million instead of $15 million per year be made avail-
able from the State Transportation Trust Fund to fund the
Florida Seaport Transportation and Economic Development
Council. In addition, the Department of Transportation
would have included no less than $25 million per year in its
annual legislative budget request for the Florida Seaport
Transportation and Economic Development Program, and
the total amount of funding to be allocated to the program
during the successive four fiscal years must have been
included in the tentative work program. The bill died in com-
mittee. (Sirjane-Samples)
Alarm Systems
SB 412 (Diaz de la Portilla) and HB 543 (J. Rodriguez)
would have allowed local government law enforcement
agencies to establish a verification call program that au-
thorizes law enforcement to be dispatched to the property
before a verification call has been made. Residents would
have been required to register with the law enforcement
agency to participate. The bills died In committee. (Cook)
Backyard Gun Ranges
CS/CS/SB 1444 (Richter) and CS/CSICSIHB 995 (Trumbull)
were bills relating to the Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services that were amended to address back-
yard gun ranges. The bills would have allowed law enforce-
ment officers to charge a person with a first degree misde-
meanor if the person recreationally discharged a firearm
outdoors in a residential neighborhood with a density of
one or more dwelling units per acre. CS/CS/SB 1444 died
on the Senate floor. CS/CS/CS/HB 995 passed the House,
but died awaiting action by the Senate. (Cook)
Body Cameras
CS/CSICS HB 57 (Jones) and SB 7080 (Criminal Justice) would
have required law enforcement agencies using body cameras
to develop policies and procedures addressing the proper use,
maintenance, and storage of body cameras and the data record-
ed by body cameras. The bills also required that each law en-
forcement agency using body cameras adequately train employ-
ees who are involved in the camera program about the policies
and procedures associated with the department's program.
CS/CS/CS HB 57 passed the House, but died awaiting action by
the Senate. SB 7080 died on the Senate floor. (Cook)
Building Codes
CS/CSICSISB 1232 (Simpson) and CS/CS/CSIHB 915 (Eagle)
were comprehensive building code bills. There were numer-
ous provisions that were problematic for local building officials
including language in CS/CS/CS/HB 915 that would have re-
quired the building code to be ratified by the Legislature instead
of revised through the typical process by the Florida Building
Commission. Additionally, CS/CS/CSISB 1232 included contro-
versial provisions such as prohibiting the Florida Building Code
from requiring more than one fire service access elevator in any
residential building and loosening the building code inspector
licensing requirements by allowing individuals to take the build-
ing code inspection examination after accruing a minimum of
100 hours, but no more than 200 hours of cross -training offered
by an approved provider. CS/CS/CS/SB 1232 died on the
Senate floor. CSICS/CS/HB 915 passed the House, but died
awaiting action by the Senate. (Matthews)
23 MAJOR BILLS THAT FAILED
the council, accept and administer funds appropriated to it
to provide annual "Challenge Grants" to lead agencies of
homeless assistance continuums of care, with preference
given to those projects that leverage matching funds. The
bill specified that rapid rehousing must be included in each
continuum of care plan. CS/SB 1500 clarified that a local
government could not expend its portion of the local hous-
ing distribution to provide ongoing rent subsidies unless
certain conditions are met. Finally, the bill specified that
funds made available to the state from the National Hous-
ing Trust Fund be deposited into the State Housing Trust
Fund would be used to develop and construct housing to
reduce homelessness in Florida.
The dedicated funding source language from CS/CS/SB
1500 was amended onto CS/CS/SB 1214 (see page 18),
a bill dealing with economic development. CS/CS/SB 1214
died on the Senate floor. CS/CS/SB 1500 and HB 379 died
in committee. (Cook)
Law Enforcement DogsyRetfred
HB 711 (Kerner) and CS/SB 1016 (Abruzzo) would have
created the Care for Retired Law Enforcement Dogs
Program within the Department of Law Enforcement. The
program applied to dogs used for state or local law enforce-
ment purposes. CS/SB 1016 passed the Senate, but died
in messages. HB 711 died in committee. (Conn)
Limitation of Actions
CS/HB 501 (Fant) and SB 1158 (Stargel) would have
reduced the time within which actions based on a latent de-
fect in the design, planning or construction of an improve-
ment to real property, could be brought from a time period
of 10 years to seven years. This change in law would have
applied only to actions commenced on or after July 1,
2015. The bills died in committee. (Cook)
Low -THC Cannabis
CS/CSISB 7066 (Regulated Industries) would have autho-
rized the cultivation, processing and dispensing of low -THC
cannabis and expanded the current list of conditions for
which low -THC cannabis could be prescribed. Of impor-
tance to cities, the bill would have preempted to the state
the location of all marijuana cultivation and processing
facilities. The bill was amended to allow municipalities the
authority to determine by ordinance the number, location
and other permitting requirements of retail facilities. The bill
died on the Senate floor. (Cook)
Medical Use of Marijuana
SB 528 (Brandes) and HB 683 (Steube) would have creat-
ed the "Florida Medical Marijuana Act," which would have
authorized registered patients and caregivers to purchase,
possess and use medical -grade marijuana. The bills would
have also authorized the cultivation, processing and retail
sale of medical -marijuana, including the transportation of
medical -grade marijuana throughout the state. Both bills
preempted to the state the location of all cultivation and
marijuana processing facilities and preempted to the county
the location and number of retail facilities, stipulating that all
such facilities could not be located within 1,000 feet of an
existing public or private elementary or secondary school, a
child care facility or a licensed service provider offering sub-
stance abuse services. The bills died in committee. (Cook)
Notaries Public
SB 436 (Soto) and HB 663 (DuBose) would have required
a notary public to record specified information in a notarial
journal when performing notarial acts. The bills required a
notary public to secure and retain the notarial journal for a
specified period, and provided a process if the journal was
lost or became otherwise inaccessible during the retention
period. The requirement to retain the notarial journal did not
apply to a notary public employed by a law enforcement
agency, an office of state attorney or the Office of Attorney
General when he or she was acting within the scope of
such employment. Both bills died in committee. (Conn)
Playground Safety
SB 504 (Sobel) would have required public playgrounds to
meet ASTM International playground safety standards. Any
public playground constructed after July 1, 2016, would
have been required to be built to these specifications, while
existing playgrounds would have to meet these safety stan-
dards by July 1, 2021. The bill also required cities to have
each public playground inspected by a certified playground
safety inspector on or before July 1, 2017. The bill required
cities to post a link to the playground safety standards and
guidelines on its website by July 1, 2016. The bill died in
committee. (Cook)
Public Facilities
SB 1464 (Dean) and CS/CS/HB 583 (Artiles) would have
required that single -sex public facilities designated for
a specified sex would be restricted to persons who are
biologically of that sex. The bills preempted cities from
regulating single -sex public bathrooms. The bills died in
committee. (Cook)
25 MAJOR BILLS THAT FAILED
Wireless Communications
HB 17 (Slosberg) and SB 492 (Thompson) would have pro-
hibited the use of cellphones or other electronic communi-
cations devices by drivers in a legally posted school zone,
designated school crossing or on school district property.
The bills died in committee. (Cook)
Use of Tobacco Products In Motor Vehicles
SB 548 (Clemens) and HB 671 (Powell) would have pro-
hibited a person from smoking a tobacco product in a motor
vehicle if a child under 13 years of age is present. The bills
died in committee. (Cook)
Volunteer Firefighting
HB 495 (Beshears) would have exempted volunteer fire-
fighters from cities or counties under a certain population
from the training requirements required of full-time firefight-
ers. The bill died in committee. (Cook)
CS/CSISB 244 (Dean) would have created the Volunteer
Rural Firefighter Certification Program, which would have
applied only to volunteer firefighters in municipalities with a
population of less than 12,000 or a county with a population
of less than 150,000. The bill established minimum train-
ing criteria and certain limitations on the use of volunteer
firefighters. The bill died in committee. (Cook)
Vacation Rentals
HB 735 (Moraltis) and SB 1344 (Altman) would have
allowed cities that had vacation rental ordinances in place
prior to June 1, 2011, to amend their ordinance without
losing their "grandfather" status. The bills also would have
allowed cities to adopt ordinances specific to vacation
rentals requiring stays of up to seven days. The bills died in
committee. (Cook)
HB 4015 (Campbell) would have repealed a preemption in
place preventing local governments from regulating short-
term vacation rentals. The bill died in committee. (Cook)
HB 4009 (Eagle) would have repealed the definition of
vacation rentals and transient apartments from statute. In
effect, this would have deregulated vacation rentals in Flor-
ida and removed their requirement to obtain licensure from
the Department of Business and Professional Regulation.
The bill died in committee. (Cook)
27 MAJOR BILLS THAT FAILED
BILL NAME............................................................. PAGE #
Low THC Cannabis.....................................................25
Sales Tax Exemption - Rental Commercial Property..... 15
Low -Voltage Alarm Systems..........................................8
Medical Use of Marijuana............................................25
Municipal Capital Recovery .........................................14
Municipal Police/Fire Pensions (Passed)........................6
Municipal Police/Fire Pensions (Failed) ........................14
Municipal Police/Fire Pensions — Boards of Trustees
...14
Municipal Power Regulation..........................................11
Municipal Property Tax Exemption..............................14
Municipal Skate Park Liability.........................................7
Natural Gas Rebate Program......................................11
Nonresidential Farm Buildings.....................................12
Notaries Public.............................................................25
Online Voter Registration................................................7
Online Voter Registration and City Elections by Mail ....19
Open Government Sunshine Review: Public Transit
Providers.....................................................................8
Pain Management Clinics................................................9
Playground Safety .......................................................25
Private Property Rights (Passed)....................................7
Transportation — Transfer of Funds...............................23
Private Property Rights (Failed)....................................19
Transportation — Vehicle -Miles Traveled Study.............22
Property Tax —Assessment of Common Elements .......14
Transportation — Vulnerable Users................................23
Property Tax — Exempt Use..........................................15
Transportation Network Companies .............................22
Property Tax — Exemption for Deployed
Transportation Network Company Insurance ..............22
Servicemembers........................................................15
Transportation Services Procurement .........................22
Property Tax— Homestead Exemption/Living Spouse
Use of Tobacco Products In Motor Vehicles .................27
of Deceased Combat -Disabled Veteran ....................14
Utility Projects..............................................................12
Property Tax — Homestead Exemption/Low-income
Vacation Rentals...........................................................27
Seniors.....................................................................14
Value Adjustment Board..............................................17
Property Tax — Military Housing Ad Valorem Tax
Value Adjustment Board Proceedings ............................6
Exemptions..................................................................6
VesselSafety...............................................................12
Property Tax Assessments...........................................15
Volunteer Firefighting....................................................27
Property Tax Exemptions..............................................15
Water............................................................................12
Property Tax: Assessment Limitation for Business ........
14
Property Tax: Renewable Energy Devices....................15
Water Conservation.....................................................12
Public Depositories.......................................................15
Water Resources..........................................................13
Public Facilities............................................................25
Water Supply Planning and Oversight ..........................13
Public Records..............................................................26
Well Stimulation Treatments........................................13
Public Records Exemption — Emergency Information
Wireless Communications............................................27
Gathering Systems....................................................26
Public Records Exemption for Public -Private
Partnerships.............................................................19
Public Service Commission.............................................5
Public -Private Partnerships..........................................19
Qualified Television Revolving Loan Fund ....................19
Recycled and Recovered Materials...............................5
Red Light Cameras......................................................26
Regional Planning Councils..........................................19
Renewable Energy.......................................................12
Report of Tax Incentives..............................................15
Residential Gun Ranges...............................................26
Residential Master Building Permits................................9
BILL NAME............................................................. PAGE #
Sales Tax Exemption — Manufacturing Equipment ......15
Sales Tax Exemption — Original Works of Art ..............15
Sales Tax Exemption - Rental Commercial Property..... 15
Sales Tax on Commercial Leases................................15
SchoolSafety...............................................................26
SectorPlans.................................................................20
Small Business Financial Assistance ..........................20
Small Business Saturday Sales Tax Holiday ................15
SoberHomes.................................................................9
SolarEnergy.................................................................12
Special Assessment for Law Enforcement ...................16
StateLands.................................................................12
State Public Safety Officers/Death Benefits .................16
Strategic Lawsuits Against Public
Participation(SLAPP)...................................................9
Tangible Personal Property Taxation ...........................16
TaxReform...................................................................16
Taxation........................................................................16
Taxis............................................................................22
Texting While Driving....................................................26
TicketQuotas..................................................................9
Transportation —TNC's Vehicle -Miles Traveled Study ..23
Transportation — Transfer of Funds...............................23
Transportation — Vehicle -Miles Traveled Study.............22
Transportation — Vulnerable Users................................23
Transportation Network Companies .............................22
Transportation Network Company Insurance ..............22
Transportation Services Procurement .........................22
Use of Tobacco Products In Motor Vehicles .................27
Utility Projects..............................................................12
Vacation Rentals...........................................................27
Value Adjustment Board..............................................17
Value Adjustment Board Proceedings ............................6
VesselSafety...............................................................12
Volunteer Firefighting....................................................27
Water............................................................................12
Water and Wastewater.................................................13
Water Conservation.....................................................12
Water Resources..........................................................13
Water Supply Planning and Oversight ..........................13
Well Stimulation Treatments........................................13
Wireless Communications............................................27
29
ALPHABETICAL INDEX
BILL NUMBER
PAGE#
HB735 ......................................27
SB 1062 ....................................10
SB 752 .......................................17
CS/CS/CS/HB 1063 ..................14
HB757 .......................................22
SB 1076 ....................................11
CS/SB 764 ................................24
HB 1077 ....................................12
HB773 ......................................11
SB 1086 .....................................14
CS/SB 776 ................................13
HB 1089 ....................................12
HB777 ......................................10
CS/CS/CS/SB 1094 .....................7
CS/CS/SB 778 ............................9
CS/HB 1095 ..............................24
CS/SB 780 .................................16
CS/CS/SB 1102 ........................12
CS/HB 787 ..................................5
SB 1118 ....................................12
HB 797 ......................................20
HB 1125 ....................................18
CS/CS/HB 817 ..........................22
CS/CS/CS/HB 1141 ...................11
CS/CS/CS/SB 824 ....................19
SJR 1142 ..................................13
CS/SB 826 ................................19
CS/SB 1148 ..............................24
CS/SB 832 ................................20
CS/HB 1151 ................................9
CS/HB 839 ................................15
SB 1154 .....................................15
HB 847 .......................................14
SB1158 ....................................25
CS/HB 849 ................................11
SB 1160 .....................................14
SB 850 ......................................19
HB 1161 ....................................19
HJR 865 .....................................15
CS/HB 1173 ..............................13
SB 868 ......................................12
HB 1175 ....................................17
HB 873 ......................................19
CS/CS/SB 1184 ........................26
CS/CS/SB 896 ..........................22
CS/SB 1186 ..............................23
CS/HB 897 ..................................9
CS/CS/CS/HB 1205 ..................10
HB 903 .....................................18
SB 1206 .....................................14
SB 906 ......................................20
CS/SB 1214 ..............................18
HB 907 .......................................15
CS/CS/SB 1216 ..........................7
CS/CSISB 908 ..........................23
HB 1227 ....................................12
SJR 910 .....................................14
CS/CS/CS/SB 1232 ..................23
CS/CS/CS/HB 915 ....................23
CS/CS/HB 1233 ........................21
CS/CS/SB 918 ..........................12
HB1237 .....................................21
CS/HB 919 .................................16
HB 1239 ....................................21
HB 923 ......................................19
SB 1244 .....................................17
CS/CS/SB 924 ...........................
15
CS/CS/SB 972 ...........................
17
CS/CS/HB 933 ..........................20
CS/HB 1283 ..............................19
CS/SB 934 ................................24
HS 1291 ...............................10,11
SS952 .......................................20
CS/SB 1298 ..............................22
CSISB 966 ................................10
CS/CS/HB 1309 ..........................6
HB 973 ......................................19
CS/SB 1312 ................................9
HB 977 .......................................13
SB 1344 ....................................27
SB984 ........................................7
CS/SB 1352 ..............................13
SB 986 ......................................22
SB 1368 .....................................15
SB 992 ......................................12
SB 1408 ....................................13
CS/CS/CS/HB 995 ....................23
SB 1412 ....................................19
CS/SB 1016 ..............................25
SB 1424 ....................................19
CS/CS/SB 1024 ........................20
CSICS/HB 1025 ........................24
BILL NUMBER PAGE #
CSIHB 1043 ..............................20
CS/SB 1046 .............................18
CS/SB 1430 ..............................24
SB 1062 ....................................10
SB 1436 ....................................13
CS/CS/CS/HB 1063 ..................14
CS/CS/SB 1444 ........................23
SB 1076 ....................................11
SB 1456 ....................................23
HB 1077 ....................................12
SB 1464 ....................................25
SB 1086 .....................................14
CSISB 1468 ..............................10
HB 1089 ....................................12
CS/CS/SB 1500 ...................24,25
CS/CS/CS/SB 1094 .....................7
SB 1508 .....................................13
CS/HB 1095 ..............................24
SB 1516 ....................................18
CS/CS/SB 1102 ........................12
CS/SB 1520 ..............................20
SB 1118 ....................................12
CS/CS/SB 1534 ........................18
HB 1125 ....................................18
CS/CS/SB 1538 .........................11
CS/CS/CS/HB 1141 ...................11
CS/CSISB 1548 ........................12
SJR 1142 ..................................13
CS/CS/SB 1554 ........................22
CS/SB 1148 ..............................24
S81556 ....................................18
CS/HB 1151 ................................9
HB4005 ....................................24
SB 1154 .....................................15
HB 4009 ....................................27
SB1158 ....................................25
HB 4015 ....................................27
SB 1160 .....................................14
HB 4025 ....................................26
HB 1161 ....................................19
HB 5401 ....................................18
CS/HB 1173 ..............................13
CS/HB 7003 ..............................12
HB 1175 ....................................17
CSICS/SB 7006 ..................18,
CS/CS/SB 1184 ........................26
HB7011 ......................................8
CS/SB 1186 ..............................23
CS/HB 7017 ..............................18
CS/CS/CS/HB 1205 ..................10
SB 7024 ......................................5
SB 1206 .....................................14
CS/CS/HB 7039 ........................21
CS/SB 1214 ..............................18
CS/SB 7052 ...............................15
CS/CS/SB 1216 ..........................7
SB 7054 ....................................21
HB 1227 ....................................12
CS/HB 7067 ........................17,
CS/CS/CS/SB 1232 ..................23
CS/CS/HB 7071 ........................26
CS/CS/HB 1233 ........................21
CSICS/HB 7075 ........................23
HB1237 .....................................21
SB 7080 ....................................23
HB 1239 ....................................21
CS/SB 7086 ..............................12
SB 1244 .....................................17
SB 7090 .....................................14
SB1272 ....................................26
CS/HB 7109 ................................5
CS/CS/CS/HB 1279 ...................14
CS/HB 7123 ..............................10
CS/HB 1283 ..............................19
CS/HB 7135 ..............................12
HS 1291 ...............................10,11
HB 7139 .....................................14
CS/SB 1298 ..............................22
HB 7141 .....................................16
CS/CS/HB 1309 ..........................6
HCR 8009 ...................................5
CS/SB 1312 ................................9
SB 1344 ....................................27
CS/SB 1352 ..............................13
SB 1368 .....................................15
SB 1408 ....................................13
SB 1412 ....................................19
SB 1424 ....................................19
31
BILL NUMBER
PAGE #
CS/SB 1430 ..............................24
SB 1436 ....................................13
CS/CS/SB 1444 ........................23
SB 1456 ....................................23
SB 1464 ....................................25
CSISB 1468 ..............................10
CS/CS/SB 1500 ...................24,25
SB 1508 .....................................13
SB 1516 ....................................18
CS/SB 1520 ..............................20
CS/CS/SB 1534 ........................18
CS/CS/SB 1538 .........................11
CS/CSISB 1548 ........................12
CS/CS/SB 1554 ........................22
S81556 ....................................18
HB4005 ....................................24
HB 4009 ....................................27
HB 4015 ....................................27
HB 4025 ....................................26
HB 5401 ....................................18
CS/HB 7003 ..............................12
CSICS/SB 7006 ..................18,
25
HB7011 ......................................8
CS/HB 7017 ..............................18
SB 7024 ......................................5
CS/CS/HB 7039 ........................21
CS/SB 7052 ...............................15
SB 7054 ....................................21
CS/HB 7067 ........................17,
22
CS/CS/HB 7071 ........................26
CSICS/HB 7075 ........................23
SB 7080 ....................................23
CS/SB 7086 ..............................12
SB 7090 .....................................14
CS/HB 7109 ................................5
CS/HB 7123 ..............................10
CS/HB 7135 ..............................12
HB 7139 .....................................14
HB 7141 .....................................16
HCR 8009 ...................................5
BILL INDEX BY NUMBER
Message—the houses of the Legislature send formal
communications to each other regarding action taken on
bills. This measure is usually reserved for the last couple
of weeks of a legislative session. If a bill dies in messages,
it has passed each chamber in form; however, one of the
two chambers has made a change or amended the bill so
that the two versions are no longer identical.
Proposed Committee Bill (PCB) — a draft legislative
measure taken up by a committee for the purpose of con-
sidering whether or not to introduce it in the name of the
committee.
Proviso— language used in a general appropriations bill to
qualify or restrict the way in which a specific appropriation
is to be expended.
Referendum — a vote by the citizens upon a measure that
has been presented to them for either approval or rejec-
tion.
Repeal — the deletion by law of an entire section, subsec-
tion or paragraph of language from the Florida statutes.
Session — Regular Session: the annual session that
beings on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in March
of each odd -numbered year, and on the first Tuesday after
the first Monday In March, or such other date as may be
fixed by law, of each even -numbered year, for a period not
to exceed 60 consecutive days. There Is no limit on the
subject matter that may be introduced in a regular session.
Special Session: special sessions may be called by procla-
mation of the governor, by joint proclamation of the House
speaker and the Senate president, or by the members of
the Legislature for the purpose of considering specific leg-
islation and shall not exceed 20 consecutive days unless
extended by a three-fifths vote of each house. In order for
members of the Legislature to call a special session, three-
fifths of the members of both houses must vote in favor of
calling a special session.
Special Order Calendar —a list of bills determined by
the Rules chairman considered to be of high importance
and priority scheduled for consideration in a specific order
during a floor session on a particular day.
Sponsor— the legislator or committee that files a bill for
introduction.
Temporarily Postponed — a motion can be made in the
chamber or in committee to temporarily defer a consider-
ation of a measure.
Veto — an objection by the governor to an act passed by
the Legislature. Vetoes can be overridden by vote of two-
thirds of the membership of each chamber. A line Item veto
may be performed by the governor of specific measures in
the general appropriations bill (the budget).
33 FLC LEGISLATIVE GLOSSARY