HomeMy Public PortalAboutA1978-02-21CC _ o _. _ 1
... . :. � �. � O . . . . . . . � , . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
. U .� �i.� r � i tl � �
� �;�-+yr �� � 11330 BULLIS ROAD �
. 9LIF04'�� ��YNWOOD, CAIIFORNIA 90P62 � �
� � , � � �77a) 537-OS00 � ' �. JAMES E. ROWE, M,ayor ,
� GEORGE W. HIGGINS, Vice Mayor �
. Councilmen s
' . JOHN-D. BYORK f
, � , EUGENE R. GREEN f'
E. L MORRIS � f
AGENDA ' �
REGULAR P+IfiETING OF THE CITY COUIVCIL �I+ THE . �
CITY OF LYNWO011
v
t
F'EBRUARY 21, 1y78 p
i
I {i
INVOCATION °
��
II . : i
PLLDGE OF ALLEGIANCE �
� � p;
zzz �
CALL TO ORDEH !�
1• Roll Call of Councilmen: ;�
John D. Byork }�
� � Eugene R. Green � f�
• George W. Higgips
E. L. P�Iorr_is '�
James E. Rowe +
�
, IV i , '
; APPROVAL OF PflINU'1'ES l. Adjourned Regular Meeting - f;
V February 7, 197�3
_ ��
2. Regular Meeting - Februar �
Y 7, 1978 '
v . �I
PROCLAMATION f
"JUNIOR C�ITHOLIC DAUGHTERS OP i i
AMERICA l^J��K" ; I
VI . i (
PUBLIC HEARINGS l. HOUSING AND COP4MUNI1'Y D1:VI:LOP�QENT �
� ADVISORY t30ARll RECOMMGNDATIONS POR �'I
; FOURTH YEAR FUNDING APPLICl�TION. Ij
a
,''' 2. APPEAL -- COND_ITIONAL USB PERM:I`1' `'
' DENIAL 'PO KEEP SIX (6) DOGS IN A ��
y R�;SIllEN'1'IAL ZONE. �;
VII ' �
MANAGEI�If:N'1' �S7'UDIES � � �
AND REPORTS �1. P.equest that the Council declare
Q� � �� intentiori to conduct a Public Hearing ���
\ ,1 on Abatement of Nuisance of certai.n
�d� structures within the I-105 F'reeway
� Corridor.
.,I
' Synopsis: Council ado�t the !�
resolution enLitled: "A RE:;OLUTION ;�
� OF' THE CITY COUNCIL OP '1'1IL CII'Y OP �
� LYNWOOD DECLI�RING I'I'S INTi3N'1'ION TO ', ��
CONDUCT !1 PUBLIC HLARING TO ASCERTA]:N
� WH�T[�fER A NUISLINCE IS F3liING MAINTATNED
ON CERTA:CN R�F�L PHOPEHTY." ;"
�i
ii
s
' �
, � _; • ; o �
� � 2. CQNTINiJ7;I) STTIDY C1F THP CITY nF LYN-
NOOD ADOPTINr. RPr,TJLATIONS RRLATIVF -
a 1 .TO ANIAIAL CONTROL.
� � �� 3. COA�IPQUNITY TRANSPOR.TATION SI;R,PICPS -
Under Title III, nLnBR ArTPRICANS ACT,
f.unds h�ve been al].otted :for the nur-
�� ch�LSe of a VAN fo'r Senior Citizens
�,�' and handicanped persons.
S��nopsis: Authorize M�L��or to execute
a�reement with Los An�eles County.
4. UPDIITE OF P:,P:iPLOYBR-EA4PLOY];F ORGANI7A-
n TION RELATIONS R�SOLUTIONS
L�' 3
� l� �,, SS�nopsis: Summation of Emnloyer-
�� Employee Relations Resolutions in ,'
conSormity with �overnment code.
•' � 5. LON[?� F3�ACF�f BOiJLEVARD R7:C'.HT-QF-WAY
ACCJUISITION, PHASE III, Parcels 32A
and 32II. ,
�� ,'.
�d Synopsi_s: Council adont attached
resolution.
6. RI;RPNTAL �F FRr�WAY PR�PRR'CY - 11435 `. ;;
CHECK AVENUE y
.�
Synonsis: Council review the nron�osal �
� to rerent surnlus freeway nropertp.
%7. RPDtOVAL'nr PARKIVAY TREF,S AT 11�20 �
' STATE STREI3T i
Synonsis: Council consi.der removal i
of both C1rob trees in the narkwav.
i
' j 8. RE(JUPST FOR PARKiVAY TREE R�D10VALS AT I
I 10924 AL�XAND�R A4ENUE I
I
' Synopsis: Council consider removal I
of the two trees in i;he parkway. �
G 9. RE(ItJFST F(1R nFlRK�VAY TR�E R1:P?nVAL AT I
' � 10700 LEIYIS ROAD �
� I
Synopsis: Council consider removal I
of. the parkway tree. ' �
.
10. RE�UPST FO� RFP!OVAL nr PARKVVAY TRFP �
AT 10903 STANDARD AVI3NTJF ;
�
Synopsi.s: Council consider removal �
of the said Car�b tree. �
1L RETtpVAL RB(JUEST 0� A PARKI4AY TRPF �
AT 11�SF HULP4P AVENUr
Synonsis: Council consicler removal �
of the Carob tree. ;
VIII i
FINANCIAL R�PORT 1. D�mand resolut:i_on ent;itled: "A �
RI;SOLUTION OP' THI; CITY CQUNCIL OF ,
� � THI; CITY pF T YNIVn�)� ALL�IV7Nr, AND �
� t1PPRnVIN(', TFII; DED4FlNDS PRTS73NT13D ANn �
ORDERING 1VARRANTS DRANN TIII;R�FOR. " �
� � � � 3 X 36' � � �-.��'l.r(�. c�_�.e� i
j
" I
. i
�- A E� 0 � � G:3 I
-�� ;
I
i
. . � •
� .
.,
rX
CITY CLERK'S AGENDA 1. Request :Prom'the followin#; organi.za-
tions for renewal of exempt licenses
C � ior salvage collection:
a. The Gospe7. Army '
b. The Rescuc Army
2. Request :from 1,yn�vood Pon iVarner "
��. �roup for nermi.ssion to conduct ca:r
�, �vash and bake sales on n?arch 11 and
Apri]. 22 at Century Boulevard and
� Bullis Road.
3. Request f�r�om�,l,he American C�ncer
� Society�to coneiuct annt�al anneal for
ftm ds during'April, 1978.
�4. Request from Uni.fication Church for
��, permissi.on to solicit funds from
February 1, 1978 to Au�;tist 30, ].A78.
� 5. llpn].ication o:f P(etronolitan ?Paste
� Di.snosal. for special nermi.t for rub-
bi.sh hau7.ing license (Sheri.:C:f's
1)epartment invest.i�*ation indicates
no b�sis for nrotest).
. 6. Application of I3ro�vnin�-Ferris
�Rr• Industries of Cali:forni.a for special
� A � permit for re:fuse hauling license
(Sheri.i'f's Department investigation
indicates no basis for protest).
7. Request from Compton-Lyn�vood Board
of Rea].tors, Inc., to narti.cinate in
� �, a paint-oui:-gral'fiti. dav duri.n� the
� week o:f Apri.l 3, 1978; and request
� for permission to place an informa-
'�� i\ tion booth in the City H�11, toyer' ��
for the purnose of nrodi.din{* in:forma- I
. tion on rea]. esl;ate prob].ems durin� I
X -Gr �� the first two iveeks in T4arch.
COUNCIL AG�NDA n ��,*'�✓,����
Playor James �. Rowe
�� <<r��rv'��,.� Vice Ptapor f:eorge IV�. H9.�gins
�6,�� Councilman Jolin D. 13yor1c
�- Counci].man I;ugene R. Freen �
r Counci]man F. L. A4orris �
.✓
,��� � l. V�ICANCIES �
,y�' � PPRS�NNIsL BOARD - One�(].).Vacancv
�. m�"� � 3� COP?MIINITY �1FFA�IRS COA4T4ISSInN - T�vo
;' . (2) Vacanc'i.es
. � � I��OTJSIN(', Rc CnP1D�?UNITY DFVI'sTOPP�iTPNT
AllVISORY BOARD - Two (2) Vacancies
XI ' ,�
PUBLIC BUSIN�SS FROM THE FLOOR ,��C� � G `�
� J� � I
� �' 4 �'. , �� p� /�� �
XI I " -� � � � v*�� qJ p � ('" � � .
ADJOURNh1PNT f�����'� to ad,journ 1;o the Acl,journ�d
,,�'.��{� ,� Rc�ular T[eei;in�* of the Ci.i;y Cocancil I
/ t��;�"� a ��` to he hel.d A4zirch.7, 1978 at 7:�� n.m: �
y%�'��F in the Council Chambers oi' CiLy FI211,
`� � - 11330 Bullis Road, Tynwood, CaliTornia f
�� .� � _
1� ,`� �� � � - : - i � ' ' ,
— � _
REGULAR b4EETINCr�� LYN4VOOD RPDliVliLOPT9FNT t1GENCY•��� � ' , '
i M� ( / / � ff )/ �( I � Februar 2�1, 197S�a��
'J � ,�/ ��2'�Wh�'$�- � J i , v
29 G.'�'l.U^�Z' ��-' � � y ' '�` . ' r_ ,,,.:n-a- ..�p'BT�I P'�'I� �w�. 6�wn+-G-i�,�'iiLG . ' . .
I �
c9'.�d , o �� �- ,�-� ° c.� 3".'""ti' �lwr-'� (� � �w.,--��,-I-�--v^ �� '`� ym,�l.n.�-u.�G7.�
�'� 7 � �/ O' �"�Q�"" / h-°�\>°_^" �e / �l'.Q�' ;�jG�`U,or� 0.o.�a...a, � �Q°J�( .
� �? � — r-,9�G��/ �N }�,�o.,�v' d�,N I ��is �lv� �Q. . I
� �'"`�'�"� . �, � . , F,. . , ' �
� ..-,�:-- . � � � �
� ,
_ , �
,���r o.�, CITY� OF LYNWOOD ;
� .�F d X � 11330 BUtl15 ROAD
��� (�`� {� � ' . . � LYNWOOD,'CALIFOANIA 90261 �� ' � t
4v �t m 4 . � . � . •
".. fFOR . ' . �213� 577-0800 �/� �:
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER � ' � / 1/� � r
�l/ i
F
February 16, 1978 E
,
�
�
i
�
}
�
HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEh4BERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL #i
�
I
SUBJECT: UPDATE OF �hIPLOYER-EIt4PL0YEE ORGANIZATION i
RELATIONS RESOLUTION .4 '
� I
� /
�9ith recent chang s�n the nature of employer-
employee relations i the State of California, the
Staff recommends th the City Council adopt t}ie at-'
tached Resolution, 69-26,.which establishes rules for I
meetings and conferring according to Sections 3500 of
the government code, and Resolution 71-32, the pro-
cedure for the handling of impasse. Also included in
Article Two, Section 6, is the procedure for elections
if and when City employees choose to change unions or.
form a union. The proposed resolutions were given to
the Lynwood City Fmployees Association and Teamsters
• Local for review and comment.
� Recommend: Adoption of the Employer-Employee Organiza-
tion Relations Resolutio .
_����� �< <.Q.�..�. �
�D�9ARD J. VALLIERE
City Manager
� lAly� • . . . _ • . '
' �, �2 O . . ' . .
U , ,,�'y s::^ _ _ T . " . � . ' .
r /'�`� ' - . � .
. .....' ................ .
'' � .-
� � ' . -
14717 BURIN AVENUE • LAWNDALE � CALIFORNIA 90260 • (213) 973-4321 • 772-4191
February. 13, 1978
The Honorable Peter F. Schabarum
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
Hall of Administration -
500 W. Temple St., Rm. 856
Los Angeles, California 90012
Dear Mr. Chairman;
Enclosed please find Resolation No. 1800, passed by the City
Council of the City of Lawndale, on February 6, 1978.
We know that the Los Angeles County Board of'.Supervisors is
interested in the opinions and views of the cities within
Los Angeles County and that due consideration will be given
to our request that you reconsider your action regarding
fines levied for traffic citations when the defendant fails. I
to appear on the original citation. _.
Thank you for your attention. We look forward to continued
cooperation between this City and the County Government of
Los Angeles.
Sincerely, .
� � / �� ,�/ �y��� �
/ J / James D. Ramsey ` I
p Mayor, City ef Lawndale I
Enclosure I
JDR:LG:bg I
cc: The Honorable Renneth Hahn ' I
League of California Cities, L.A. Div.
Mayors of the Cities of L. A. County � �
I
�
" ;
� ' - . �
. - I
I
i . - ��
�.
I RESOLUTION NO. �800
A RESOLUTION OF TfIE CITY COUNCIL OF TH�
CITY OP' LAWNDALE, CALIPORNIA PROTESTING
THE ACTION OF THE LOS I�NGELES COUNTY
BOI�RD OF SUPERVISORS AND REQUESTING RE-
CONSIDERATION OF THEIR ACTION REGARDING
DISTRIBUTION OF FINES F'OR VIOLATIONS OI'
THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE.
WHEREAS, the County of Los 1ingeles has previously shared all
fines levied £or hazardous violations of the California Vehicle Code
with the municipality within which the original traffic citation was
issued; and
WHEREAS, the fines included levies for violators who failed to
appear upon their written.promise to appear, as articulated on the
original citation; and
WHEF,�F.S, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors have di•- -
rected that the municipalities shall only share in that portion of the
fine levied �or the original offense; and
WHEP.:AS, the Los F�ngeles County Board of Supervisors have di•-
rected that all fines levied for the oifense of failing to appear upon
giving a writt�n promise to appear by a citee, as articulated in Secti.on
40508a of the California Vehicle Code, shall be retained by the Coutny
of.Los Angeles; and
WN�.�E�S, this decision has imposed a financial burden upon the
municipalic?�s by reducing anticipated revenue to the municipalities.
NO��, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY'OF LAWNDALE, CALIP-
ORNIA DOES HEREBY RESO:,VE, DETERMINE �ND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That communication be for�;ar3ed on behalf of the
Ci.ty of Lawndale protesting the action of the Board of Supervisors of
Los Angeles County and requestiny that the pre�ious acticn be recon�-
sidered so that a more equitable resolution can be attained regarding i
traffic citees who fail to appear in court on.their original citation. '
I
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1978. I
�
�� � I
YOR, City of Lawnd� I
ATTEST: I
STATE OF GALIFORNIA ) I
. COUNTY OF LOS 71NGELES ) SS �
CITl OP' LAWNDALE ) �
I
I, ALFRED W. TFIOMPSON, City Clerk of the City of Lawndale, Calif- I
ornia, do hereby certify that the £oregoing resolution was duly approved
and adopted by the City Council fo the City of Lawndale at a regul�zr meet--I
ing of said Council held on the 6th day of Febr.uary, 1978, by the fol- �
lowing roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehinger, Kennedy, Kruse, Ramsey and'fioberfs
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS• None
AI3STAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
Ai3SENT: COUNCIL b1EMBERS: �`lone
_�,:� %�.!' �'�' •/- '��1,/�yAl/ �.
-S�. �---`� r �
C:C � CLP,Ri', G_ Ly�f Lawndale
��
,
. , . . - .� . . .� . ; � : � . � - c� �;�z.
' ' ' .: � . - � NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING. .
� NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that hearing hae been scheduled to
prov[de an opportunity for Lynwood residents to expresa their viewe on f .
the City's Housing and Community Devetopment appl'►cation prior to
submisaion to,the .County of Los Angetes Department of Community .�
. Development. � . � . .. � . .. . '
. , NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the City Council will conduct a
public hearing'on eaid project funding application [n the Councll Chambers.'
` " . . r . . - .
� ofthe City Hall, 11330 Buil[s Road, on Tueaday February 21, 1978
at 7:30 p, m. or as soon thereafter�ae:fhe matter can be heard. ` � '
.. ,
;; .
,' NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that �any peraons wiahing to comment �
, �.' on the proposed application-,may do eo in wrLtiag, and all residenta and �-
� owners of, property�wlthln the "Clty of Lynwood are entitled to attend at �
the time and place noted..and offer.any information relevant to the -
. . . _
Community Development application for.the C[ty of Lynwood. '
� • Dated this 6th day of. February, 1878. : - . ° �
' ' LYNWOOD CiTY COUNCIL - - . " � -
By Josephine L. Shepherd, -C[ty Clerk - � . • - - .
' Publieh:� February 9, 1978 . _ _ � . ' _ " . ' , .
� . , � . . t � � •
i
. • �
February 21, 1978 • •
HONORABL,L MAYOR AND
MEMBERS OI� Tlil; CITY COUNCiL
� SUBJECT: TTOUSI�'�G &. CON1PnUNITY DLVELOPMENT ADVI.SORY ]30APiD
RL;COMMENDATIC��NS 1�OH FO,URTI�] YEA73� i'UNI�ING APPLICATION
Gentlenien:
�At a special aleetin� held on February 9, 1978 the HC15A ]3oard voted to maice the �
following recominendations to the City Council for their fourth year application
for Communit,y Devetopinent Block Grant funding:
1. That the City continue its I-lousing 13ehabilitation I'ro�ram in the amount
of $413, 000. This program will aLLow for the following activities:
A. Low-interest i`oans to qualified homeowners through Security
Pacific National 33aiilc. The City.�vill subsidize the interest
rate on home irriprove�7ient loans from the current market
rate of 11°�o to a rate bf 4%.
B. Nun-interest loa��s to qualitied homeowners. The City will
loan' up to $5, 000 Por Ilousing Rehabilitation to�those homeowne,rs
re;jected by Security ]3an1: and sho�ving a need. This loan is made
interest free.and repa,yable when the property is sold or at the '
end of 20 years, wl�ichever occurs first.
C. M.iterials rebate to qualified homeowners. The City �vill rebate�
up to •25°fo of the cost' of materials to a homeowner �vho has �
� repaired his own hc�me: Ln some cases the Cit,y would rebate ,
up to 25°jo ��f tl�e cost of work done b,y a licensed general c.ontractor.
In any case alt work must be coordinated through the City to ,
be eligible.
ll. I]andiman Program - The City �n�iLl �prbvide up to y�500 w�srth of
repair work on the houses of senior citizens anil low to moderate �
� income families Eree of chargE: This �vork will be performed by
Cl;:i'A �vorkers �vith supervision and materials supplied by the.
City. Such worl: �vi1L include,' but is not limited to, deadbolt � � �
- Locks, smoke detectors, minor electrical repairs, patching roofs,-etc'.
E. Property Inspection - This prograni wi11 atlotia for a person to woik
with the City's Code Fnfvrcemet�t Officer to identify priority areas
for the above inentionec3 programs.
i
2. �That the Cit,y continue its Com�nercial Rehabilitation Program in the
amount of $60, 000. I
Together with the `pGO, 000 budgeted frciin third year 11CDA funding, �
this program �viLi allow for the administration of a I-IUD 312 Commercial �
Rehabili,tation Prqgram. A 312 loan allows a' husinessman to borrow � �
up to $50, 000 for 20 ycars at 3% interest, to rehabilitaLe.l�iis place
of business.
I
�
_ r � !`, . � . n �1 �, . i
�; � �t _� �
�, �� �; �� '' '
_ � .
.
` • •
3. That the City continue its Neighborhood Association Suppox•t Program
in fhe amount of g3, 000. This program assists in the formation and
maintenance of neighborhood associations such as block watch, etc.
4. That the Ci.ty a�pl for a ne�v program to provide for paramedic training � � � �
in the amount of .$77, 000. This program would allow the I� ire Department
to pay the costs of trainin� ❑ine of their present fire personnel as fuLly
accr•edited paramedics. In addition, it �vould pr•ovide for tfie purchase
of the necessary equipment to convert an existin� vehicLe to.parartiedic use. '
i
5. . That the City apply for a ne�v program to provide for a pc�sition of
l��conomic Developnient Coordinator in the a�ziount of �50, 000. � �� �
This program would allow the City to retain the services of a
full-time economic developer and pa,y al1 expenses pertaining to '
such a program.
'It is the recoin��tendation of.the Cit,y�s ]Tousing and Coinr»unity ]Jevelopinent
Advisory Board that the Cit,y Council authorize an application for fourth
year Coinmunity 1Jevelopment Btock Grant funding, for the.programs
noted in this report.
i,DV✓ARb S. VALLILI3E ,�
City Il�Ianager /
�/ � `\ `_7 � ,
� � � , < <f0 ���/
l.a � ., ��i� �
CHRISTOPI�LI? R. J'Of31VSTON
I Director
I
I
i
i
,
, I
I
i
�
I
�
I
�
I
�
�
i
I
�
�
�
I
�
r
. ! •
PROPOSED PROGRAMS FOR FOURTH YFAR
HCDA FUNDING
1. HOUSING REHABILITATION ' $413, 000
A. Low Interest Loans
B. Non Interest Loans
C. Rebates
D. Handiman
E. Property Inspection
2. COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION 60, 000
3. PARAMEDIC 77, 000
4. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 50, 000
5. NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION SUPPORT 3, 000
$603, 000
. .
PROPOSED PROGRAMS� FOR I'OURTH YEAR
HCDA FUNDING
1. HOUSING REHABILITATION $413, 000
A. Low Interest Loans
B. Non Interest Loans �
t
C. Rebates '
D. Handiman
E. Property inspection
2. COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION 60, 000
3. PARAMEDIC 77, 000
4. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 50, 000
5. 1VEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION SUPPORT 3,'000
i
$603, -000
I
�
I
I
r
�
. I
�
�
1 � • •
February 21, 1978
HONORABLE MAYOR AND
MEMBERS OP THE CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: REPdOVAL OF PARKWAY TREES AT 11020 STATE STREET
Gentlemen:
Mr. Pete Lopez, property owner at 11020 State Street, has submitted
a request for removal of two parkway trees at his address,
Mr. Lopez stattes that the tree roots are lifting the sidewalk and
destroying the curb and gutter at sabject addresso Moreover an
accident has occurred there as a result of this existing ha.zardous
condition.
Inspection of the existing condition has revealed that the two (Carob)
trees are creating a public hazard.
Mr: Lopez has submitted an Environmental Evaluation Statement wzth
his request in compliance with Council Resolution 75-34,
RECOMMENDATION
Council consider removal of both Carob trees in the parkwa.y at
11020 State Street.
�t,tra. . Vd-�
EDWARD J. �ALLIERE '
Acting Director of Public Works
Attachment
I
. . � . . . . � �',� w q��a
� +t a + .r ' i/ . � (
.. .� �: L ��,�sP�� . .. •.. CITY GP LYN�VOOD O ��t/ ir , f � .
/ I �V!\LUl�TI01' (SIIORT I «/'� �''� �'�
( � i� �� � � \ V / .// . .
!
ll � (Pleasc type or Print) ���ry' ;' r,
�
. ,aa...:. .
1. Name of Proje Proposer: �, �
� . Address: r c:,
i , •.
2. i;ature and Description of Project: '
AU/1 = �7AO/ � `i -
r
�., .
, .
� ,,:. �
�
3. f�ddress of Project: �///��(J _�'��� .�,�; .
�, (� ����—��'!' ;w"�ay .
flegal description, piease attach separately)
. 4. Action by the City necessary for Project Implementation:
� .i,., O _
i
`-,' 5• Is the Project of such significance that' it will have a��' effect on
-> �----- -� tne environment of the City?
' Project Proposer: Yes No �✓ t -
City Yes No i/ �'
"�` If the answer is yes, a full environmental impact
'; statement evaluation should be completed. ` i
j,
�� ' G. Wh t is t e environmental impact of the proposed project or action?
�:; . .
��+ �`� f � o � o G.
;� _�,<:.,
r., a ..
+;i ,�" ` ,
�� ,
�� �� � '��.
p,: �� ;
��i ,� �
,{
l . a o a
r'
,r ` � i —
��I 4, 7.: /�re there any adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided if the
��yi proposal is� implemented?�p If yes, what are they?
f'"� �
� t:r� � • � ,
� ' ;�'
t � '
•(F:,I . . , _ .
�.
� 7 i. '
I'� .
1 l ,
i i l ii � 8. What mitigation measures are proposed to minimize the impact?
i'!° .� �
,�
� , ��a: ; � �
,d���� .
n� �
�� � -
� �] F� I �' 1 . ' _ ' . . t � 'i.
N��'�� � • � � ��
y +l��j t'k . � .: Y ' ^` , #`1
� ���y� , � � �
\ ��'t . - . � .. ,. . , '' rT . �
� .�. o ... .._ . , . . . . .. . . ..
� ���' -�� � ... _ . � � . - r� � +.� q
i 4 ' � r . �. � . . • • , . ' P t h�'. ,
'.H� . ' � � . . . . .. 'Y
{�,� � .. ' . ' ' Nti f
�; , , r .. . "�. . " _ . . '� 1 �t"�
�;i� . . . � � ,�� ���.,'
'� l
. . . : or �� � i
1
O' !'t ' ' , s ��� �
�
i �ij . � � '` „ ;
r.; ,. 9. �Vhat are the al.ternativ�s to the proposed action or projec4? (ThaC is, i���.,
I t�; ' ether than not doing it at ail? ) t i �"`',
i
, � .��;
� � . p��h�•
� � � i , � � � �� ���`
� I
1 1 �� 1 �
� � � ' ' ' �L� rP
I '
N 6 M� �� ` 'J�'�P,�
]1 ��,,, i
3 �� ��.. � � �� - I
y � � + � % `i :� ��!
i���=!; � 10. �'✓hat is the relationship.between local short-term uses of man's { !k�'.
' i ^nvironnient and the maintenance ancl ciili1n�ei�ient of lotth-term pro�ucti , �,��;
� (Will the proposed short terin use dc;tc�r iruin the maintenance and enhanc ntr� �;�,:,
�I,�_.
I I i b9
' ?�� �� oi long-term environmental goals?). : ,
! � i nij
i . �, , '� ��
i ' t ' � ' u�;
�, . `
' f °�`" . ° r , �` ��
'' N'�"'' � ' � � �hv
� �� D
1 �+ �LI . / � � ' : 'i
,� `,� _ ` . . . , ' � �� � Il
�l' �UII��I;' . . . . . �i.l�
11 I pl ' Y � �� � °
ll `{ iu� �{ L ' . µ 9 '�� �i
� �f �x` � �� i � � � _ . u 1 . + f
t `� d'� r i
��' ,�� ,, 11. /1re there any inreversible environmental chan�es which would be involved. ' ��i"
�6 � � ��
�' �� � in the proposed action or project should it be im lemented? _._ .-
,, � j , ;
�� � , � ��
, '� <<, � �. ..-- 1
F`,, „� �� , ��1�'
��, �;:; � _ �,� ���,�
,i , �, i�: i,.�,��.��
tl `� I � � � "� �'
�, � ,Ip � �
i �� � , , : � ar � �
p i � ,� �; r. � � , ��I �
t ��� �,. � � �
�i� � �i � _ � � u � �� �
'i:�
i s ;.,-. � ,�l� t!
I � r•�! i . � . � � .. ' � . �" 'sN 'c
i } 1 �I;.,1'�1
{ y. �
� � .'� ,
� �.� �� �'J� 11 d�����1�
, �w'��,� j 12. ITo�v will the proposed project foster econo�inic or'population *ro�s�Lh �, � ul'�`��
7� . r,t.f . n, 7'' u'1
� u; � either directly or indirectly, in the cotnmunity . ,, i�
� � �; �;� � � . " . . . � � di �. � �
� `, �, .���,p
�';����; � . . . . , i4�.
� �� <� � i '� . . '� � f • ' �. � �k
� f i
�� ,,f � . � � � . I i I
;� { I�
��� . � . i � � ��
�. �, f ,. � , . _ � , �, � ,�
r m� �� v! �. � � , • . � r� 4" �E
� :�� 1 �i � i � r�. 6 ��i
q ,��, _�_'�, � ���,,�
� _ �
, , ���is. , �.�, ,�
� , �;'i
'�� �� �'� ���: � �»1t�> �',. , ,
(Si:;�t; tiare�of .'lrnli � nt) ��,
i , i �,.;
4� ��, � .l � . ,�r ��
� � 4 1 i i i� Ui:� C.ITY US� ONLY:
�, ,�� � � � � � � � � , ,���;
�� t ". � �
y� ,, I 1?,ecemmended Action: � C'i���:
,� l i �I,f � ,, a �Gj�
� w��� '.
� i { j � � - � , �. i �I Ai{� .
�I �•� �I��� ',�,ecorded and Filed: n2onth �i �i4',� ��
t �. � : � U, . , Da � � � �q��r ��
4 � + ' ' Y � �.tti1, �
` : ( � 1 � i � Year ' � M!i
� � G�{� � � �I�{ „
�, � „�,�, . {
�� � „ �r4k r �, � ,�
.� �� li a � �' �� "
� U h ��li��� , � � . � ' " � �
� �� , ' ;
�i ` • ? . .. . , . . . . . +�q
u� � � + � _ .. . :� �. '
I �i�;;�i� k :, - . � ... . . . . . 'CI
,
, , � ,
, � � ;� �
ti � �°"� ; � d��
�I�, _ : --" � � '����g
I4 ; � � ,
�i ,��i,. � `I� a, �;�
!':! I '� �' ' � � �{ C�kl
� � n; � ;
� ,a��(� � � .
� � ��!� •a �I�
��' ,�,, ;
���, : �
a,i i . i
I t' ' ��' �
' �!� February 21, ,1978 � '''
< < � �i�
a r �
a � � ��,' { r!
�� ,; � �;,� HONORABLE MAYOR AND ,
�, i, a�� MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL � ai
q �' i � i�
,, �'q� SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PARK�VAY TREE REMOVALS AT 10924 ALEXANDER AVENUE
�f �'''�
� R i � � b' �� Gentlemen: _
I t � i.a
�� i'i' Property owner, Micheal Hambrick, residing at 10924 Alexander Avenue
;� '�f( has submitted to the�Public Works Department a request for the removal
��� '���� oY two parkway trees at his address.
� � � ��'
aC`j �; Mr. Hambrick feels that the roots of the trees in question have out-
�iN ���� grown the parkway area and are creating cracks in the sidewalk and
„�$ ,i,�street. This makes it unsafe for driving as well as walki.ng in this
' 91 � ' area.
II 1 i �
�d1 I,I;u Inspection o� subject location revealed that existing conditions in the
��i i'.d,Ipublic right-of-way pose a hazard to pedestrians using the sidewalk,
al S I ,
�I�d���������Mr. Hambrick��has submitted an Environmental Impact Report with his
��;i 6'�request in c.ompliance with Council Resolution 75-34.
7 � , ; II
� � � I ��'�RECOMMENDATION
�� �� �� consider removal of the two trees in the parkway at 10924
��� � {� �Alexander Avenue.� �
� � � � � W� ` V 1.�.�R
��I� ,�a G';�� �
` '� � ' :�ED{YARD J. VALLIERE
�{�I.1
� j„_�p�lActing•Director of Public Norks �
t� `,
,{ �, � !.' �Attachment
b : � �1��
�
�;
� ,� � t ,,�. �
,� � : y 4 . . ._
I I` ` I � .
�,�`���� � _ .:
�w �I � _
' 'Ri` ; � :_-� .
.
i� .
�'' � �' �^ ', .
�I '1'. � � � .
„g D
II '+ I . .
� � .,
n �t Rl < ,
11. � � , ..
i "� „
�n �!° �
����,` �� .
, ,� .,; , ,
�� •� p ,i
i ��, �� �i
iq � �� ;q . .
Ik f :,1
% j', i � A
,� _
-
,i � . , � �
, ,-. ,
. l�
I � ��L�" ~ CIPY Ol� LY'N�VU(�U I �,�✓� '� ,.
� d" . � � , .-
� � , I /) �r� o
;i�.�_� 1sNV11LONt�1L'1V'1'l11��1:VAJ,ll1\1'lON (S1�lU1L'I' F liN1) � ��.'r/ �� � �
�.ia �, ..7
�� , ' f ' JYlease tyE�e or Yrint) .
�{ 1 . � �
b t � , 1. Name of Yroject Proposer: � A .� �
�
.. .4 d �', � 0 �- C�ii/ Ci � 1 ..
:;
Address:
i �' .,
°�i � 2, Nature and Descr.iption of Yroject: � p ,/a � -✓ e_ e.5' �
F° i
;,���'��� f� /vooT.s ��a,�� Ca�ou,�d� � �v si" T�-r� '"r�ek � ,� �.'.
� ,�
' �, I � tl d. � l /� t er_7" ,
�� �
� .
,
oi� { �.
I
«I�d� fl � . � � 1�- ��a
�
I � o"' �
, u 1 � . � . G �,
+ �; '
PI �� � ''. ' . I�. 1
i f {ql �, t ' . . . . ,
� ��i � 3. Address of Project: / U°.1 � � f e,�G �7 N d F.� �� e__ I
j 9^ �': (If legal description,, please attacfi separately) ;;
r� y� � {��
,, �B� � 4, Action by the City necessary for Project Implementation: �.. I
�ii b
�� 6�� f���� � io T��-ree< f7n,� -re�R��.�i�rve _c�� �i,ral/L /3Nd { �, ��
a � , � � i
� �I
siree� '� '
! '� �i
r � ���� 2• � 11
� � ,� ; ,�
'� �. � �
1 i . . . . �t . � �.r
� u � �
i o '5. Is the Project of such significance that it will have a a .D � effect on �i'i'� �
r'� the environment of the City? , ' '�;
,, i �
i '�' � Project Proposer: Yes � No � � ,�`'� `
t pi I
�'+ li�,i Ci�ty � Yes � No � �'�
� ���� �jp
�j " �,pd IC the answer is yes, a fu11 enviroui7icntal impact � ;i� ..
� �' ����' statement evaluation should �be completed. " �°l�
� , iE 7�� , : �,
� �� i ir � � � � � � ,;
�� �� I Iy6 What is the' environmental impact of th'e proposed project or action? F ,-
i ���,,� •. , i F � . . �
� fij , °I ! e e. � -r e e r � I i✓ � c: � I,i; �� �, �
�� �I �
' � /a -r , Q � J3 ni A ��� y ����L� i ,f/ S� ��.ra �✓a / k � S'7� � e T � :.: � ; � i
�� a; � �; . � _ 7 � I �i . {i �1 �'.
�'1i.���i� i. �J-���t�%✓9 iTT� h�F rJn/Sa E fo-� 0,��,/�iv9 /�ivc� ,���1/k��.e '{��
d�� I �� � J
i,�iy �a„�li�', hni s,�deu�Ail< � � � f:�;� � ��, . �''�
� `, � � I.:
�� � ,� . � �� � � ,
�� � ,
,, � ,
� ,�� , 7. Are there any adverse environmental effects wtiich cannot.Ue avoided if tlie �,,; }� ,
�� proposal is implemented?�� If yes, wl�at are they? �I �� I�.'
�� � ' �' ` j � � �
� i 6 � � i � y ,.
{ l� � t �' � 'J nl � � ;
� �
I '�
�, i. ' i i ' U _.
� y.� �
� I ' i111 l . 4.�
� £ I U J .
�� , ! ��� �� ��
I,. . �11 � 1� ' 5p
�� �� . I . . y 1� �f •'I , '1.
i I,, SI� What mitigation measures are proposed to minimize the impact? ,(� I {;
r
'��S � ��A/�' I 1 "!;
�, �r: � , , ° ��� � ; �
� �; . � . � ' i I ,' j
�� 11I � ���,. �'��:�r
� . : �I! : . i R i �I,:� �i
�� r � . , , � � �Ih ti � � ��: � .
�I; ! �
�� I I''� 'rl VI''
t � � �., j� ! ���� �' �; �'.
� � �•.
�� ,i� .. , � � } +��
��� � ;�a� _-- - -- -- __. -- _. _ ---- ,�� � � �� 1i,
-
�1 i� _. , • � ��� i , �� �
� � , , a.., ' � i I� i !.
• � � i q
, t _ . • � �; ���- �
� � ��I�; . � . ; A . II��� ,�'„ 1� 1
�� �.� . r : ' 'I !, ; ,►
� ,
� b � .. � � � , � � � � I� ���'`� �;' ' i !�� ��:
1 �
l i �.. � • � ' • � � eC �'M�I� I I
�� ��I. �� � � 1���� �� .��
I 1 - , . � ��� � �i
� , �
1 � � { �. � ��� �
�"�
�,i ^ 9. What are the alternativ�s to the proposed, action or projecC'?, (Tliat is. I�,, y�',{{q�
1 � �� other tlian not doing it at a117) ; � ; ' �1'��� �"�
���I �� �,�:
� ��j', . � _ � .. . e
� j' � f � i �. � � �; , � , �!��°� +p ; .
( „ iy ' j � ; � �� � �i;� ; �,� ,�'��.
�1 �<� �, . � � � � i � �,��,� � .°
�9 �i , � �,.i "� �,
i � � F �I ! I t � ' � � 111��9' f {�I' �
I � � �, � � ' � �i '�',�
, , I� � ; •�� �• � � � � ',�d;��;
"� ! TO.� What is tl�e relationship b'etween local short-terni uses of man's, � i���� ,7��a {�
��� �,���, � environutent and the niaintenanceia��d ��enhail�cenienL of long-tci•m pi-oducti� �� ���
�I�' '+ (Will the proposed short term use cieter,from the maiiitenance and enhance � f t ��q �(
I
, i � +, of long-term environmental.goals?�) � � • � ��,��� � � i ;'
_ �� �,
, , , � a �� ��,�� "'� ' ' �.�"
�
� �� ; �
!,,; , , , i ,�� , � �
� ��, ��, � � � ,�„�;,� �,�
', � , ,; ,; , , i!'it�l�� �� ; ,1i . � �p
, � ` � '', , , � � ��.� �� � ,;��I(il� �u � �'a � �� �
'�� �!� e,' ; I�!illi�� � I I� ��';?��
, !4r ��' � � ��..,���
� � � � i�l � � � � . I :� � � ���i������ �� � I 4) � -. �i��f �
` ' '�� � �I� � ,, ,���, � , ���� '�
, z � i i .� � ��f �� � � �� ��.�, ��1,�
11. Are there any irreversible ei�vironmental clianges .,vhich would be involved �,i�h � i,�'��
� � . �� . . �,�, 1 t ,;.�i���.
� � �,�, �in tl�e proposed-action or project should it be impleinented'1 �� ���, � �� �;, ��
' p� I � I� � � � � � w t, r i'
N C! / D l/ /� / n-� /� y�� � o�� '% e o a a- c� 1%� e C7`-„ ? P_T _, 1 � q �, �
� ', �� � . — 'IiH � $ ���, I ,' �
I �-J�t/d 'mA/Ce iT Sr7 .e,� I.� � G/�ir�c J�.✓�,/ v�✓�N� � �,
f � � , � � ��.{ �� ai o h�:
�i � a � F:9e�� �,I� �.
� I �� �h " �,.
� rij � � � � � ' � '���� I,�.� � I� ���, ��i
° � II � G��
���� � i l i'
i � '� � I �� {
}� ,�ii.�. ' .
� r , . �I � . � �i�� 'X ��i�� �
a'� ' i � � . . � �� , ,
ji �
i ' � � � � I �,
� u, i 12. Ilo�v will the proposed pr•oject_ foster economic or population growth, ��• �r 1� i����� ��
, Id +��, �
�, �,'� eitlier directly or indirectly, in the community? Mn �i � ��a
d �{
� '� � � � � �1�� �
� y��, �FAU��1/ ��Y' �Y'a�� �7 P —�JN� �Y /�L M�P � T /Yr�']v'�� �� i �"I°{ �
� � �� '! ' � . —� i'�II �� �,�..iI.� .
,I � ' i ,; ' � �e , . , , . - y � ' tiil'� �
a � i '� . . . I���Y i pl� n
. � - � ' +q�o�j
� i { : il ., ' . . , ���'�� ,i�
' , 1 � . . . , .. . . .. . . . i <9 '`I�il
? I � � �����',
� .� - � �1 i�.�,;
�. ' � � _ � � � �i"1 C ,�
i 13. � (;��� � �7 �� �4� ����,�
, � �'1,� e.��� (,r�.. ��� 4.�-� � , ,�, I �
�� i
(Si���,it>>re of �p��lic,anC) (1)alc) ���� ���' ����.�
�ai � � i � � � i
�� __ ���OK Ci'1'Y USL:�ON1.Y: � � � t �f, �. ��
� �'j� � � i ' �� �
'�� i Recominencled Action: � p r I
� i I , �� �. �, i
�; � i � d I'�I
�' � � ,� , ��J
� ":itecorded and Filed: l��Ionth 1 '�` 'd' i: �'n
� � � � I)ay, � � ,� � �; ��,
•�� �� lu ��. �.Year � , E i i � ' .
� , , :, , :��
„ . �; �
� �By �-;�;��� , �r ii��i
� I . . . , �. ,' . . . . � i I � 1 � 8.
l P 4 �
.. , ,'� � '
t j r � . - � . . . . . . � � I I� �I
• � . p ' • . I � ' � I
�. � i.. �: , . _
F Y/.
N
��{ � Y ^ ` � I . ,1
�� ' � ' . � , � a . � I I �M1� � � �I �� � � � �� 1
� � I � I ! �
l. . . , . � 1 � j � I �� ''
� , . _ '. . '.,}' , n ., i I �� �
� I i
�
� �
r
. F. . . �' i {�II �',- j II .�.I�' ,
, , . ' , ' .� �',
II �
f
,� � � . , '� . .
�� �'��Ilb,l
, �,�; �
�, �, a . ��
�i . � ; i �, : 1, �� .I�
� �' February 21,.1978 � ;,! i
I
I �'� •� II I II I A�'.i ' �i' I
� '� �� ` ��," i
���,; HONORABLE MAYOR AND � I��
G�'�: MEMBERS OP THE CITY COIINCIL $�' ���� I'����
I • ' �r �
� , SUBJECT: REQUEST POR PARK�YAY TREE REMOVl1L AT 10900 L��VIS ROAD �� �
� �
I li i�.; �. I'i :
Gentlemen : � �,;
, �,
C� Mr. Edgar,L. Bottom, property owner at 10700 Lewis Road has submitt�d'
a request for the removal of a parkway tree at his addresse
,� i Mr. Bottom states that large tree roots are damaging the �idewalk, i
;� curb and gutter in front of his property. The gutter damage has also
� I , , caused probler�s.
1 `
4 ' Inspection of the tree has revealed that it has outgrown t.he parkway'
area and should be removed.
I �� , � . f I., '
Mr. Bottom has complied with Council Resolution 74-•34, by subr�z+,t.in��
� ;, an Environmental Impact Report.
�,
i RECOh4MENDATION
�� 1 Council consider removal of the
,I j parkway tree at 10700 Lewis R,cad.
f
. I
i ;�
i
' �� �i 'ED�VARD J. VALLIERE � 1 �
` Acting Director of Public ti'Jorks �
� �^i .,
� Attachment
i�l�. . . . ._ � ..r��� '
i i� !I 4 f
I 1i'
� i � �;� ..
���' .
, � f ����..._ ;
� ��
, ;.
� �I.l � - ' ' ' . .. r,y i � ,
i � �. . . . a ..
'� �
I��'�i . {
��� ,
�1 I �
n I f I ' 1 ' �
�rl � . ; . . . .. . � � .
�.I . ! . F� �.��
! • 1
k��� � I� � � � , ,:,- i ;;;�,
� i�,� � �,..
j • , �
,� i � � , �i�.
� �
�
I '
I '�� ' !
e I' . r .
.,
' Fy . , ' n r 1 � ' t. . I � � 1
{ � I '� _ . . . . , . . ., , . �. . . . I .1rl ' .
� "` ' ` . CITY OI' LYNWOVU a � )� ' � '� '
� � ���. �� . . .. . . . � I � � 3 �.
'�,�� � � � . LNViRONIVIENTAL EVALllAT10N�� (S1I01tT �� O1�,M) � -��� , ���, r
,
��'���,�;� � � � ���"(Ylease type or Print) � � � � � � ";� � � ',
�, µ� �
� R�< i , ;, I ,
1�. 1. Name of Project Proposer: - �' � � �� v t
� �
u�k+ '� � �Address: � " �� j� dUt�o ��
!y ,• ��
� f W _
i !• 2. . Nature and Description of Project: J j f-' /l�l o)� l�� i> %� `� �' �' ��'
, ,
� tC. . � . � - . ` .
, � ,�� _ /= �'��,��� 1��=� �3 k i iv�� � i�� e �.� � `;� � C� _�_��� �' ' �
. �
� � �!.i . � � � � � ' � � �
,;� ; v � i � � !.e = c '
.��tat� � (��
�I;� � „�!� , l/ s7�:S R'� � rV /�S �"=� I S c� /_� �� A� /'�1� `7 e e Roo"7's �� �
� ,II . ;
� � ',
3�
� ��
� I i
� �t �..
� ��� � �� � . . . .. . . . i �.
� . 1'
� z�d ( 4 ' . . � � . . ��
�u'�' g � , 3. Address of Project: ,� � , �_ ,L � �J � ' D. � � ' ✓ !U c�� j� "/�. � k �
������� (if legal description, please attac separately) �
n
���'�� � � � � � � ;
0 1 1 °{ G' i
�
��'f +� 4. Action by the City necessary for Project Imp,lementation: �,'�. � �
� k � N � 1
II � � - , . . � �
',��d °u� �� � iv� �� zi � 7/� e e -'� N� If �'n� ��� STs����%� q � ;.
M �II :{� � � � � � � I��� �.
, '� ��;�.� � ��� /> � ,�� f�� % !t ;� N �L_�� k �� [ � ��-' (� � �, I ;
�1 � .;
� ���, � � � ;"����' ,�. ��
� � ���
�� ; �� !i � �
,�� rf{' 5. Is the Project of such significance that it will have a effect on '�' �,r, �° �
�� ti��� ;� _' the environment of the City? � ��;� r� ��
� ��� t, �, �
1i ',} . . Project Proposer: Yes_� No i'
A
I
�
� ��1 i,:.; � , � City � Yes No � ��!„ i f��� i
M {.
�
� �..e - � � a - �
��� ti � If'the answer is yes, a full environmenfal impact �'� s���j� �
�� statement evaluation should be completed �� i �i �� �i
��..' �, � ,�:
v ia + '_ 6. , What is the environmental impact of the proposed project or action? �� �i °��' '
� _ � ,"
� , ,.. 1�
� ���.� � h�� /s e.� (� �� f��L�r/ c 1.S /3 IJd�/t/ s' e l� T� �� 1 � � �;
���.,�'� � � . � _� /� � + " '���
° �G � ��� ' <-• c - cc � � / � � � o� "" e �T- - N 'u '131�� ��' � .
t � ��� , � �
1 ° _ ' L� d � rr�, ��� �e �' ST1> " � �z{(��k�
''i� '�},' S��r> 7 rc�/��r e Tf.<� Xa��Ts N�t T/�E S7i�N�'.�TR�1
�� �� �'/�e s� �'� e �v R� i�s f-� �?o/t�� /� rt�,l7 /�� �/,s <'D �%��'/%Lz�,�'�
, �
� i a° Z�c��T_S f��3 �✓��,2 �'v J_NF' ��cd<< �' d C'c�� / U %'/�� S ! �s����l{t l �,
� - , C � � � 7
, ���h � 1 �
j, ��� ,�r �'�7. Are there any adverse environmental effects, which cannot be avoided if the �� �7 �� f ,,
{ wi �; proposal is implemented? If yes, what are�they? ' � �I� ��� �.
9 �
�� i� 4 1� ,� .
`� �i
�� � �` • , I I �
i�� � ( i '�� �.
� � � ,� �� � , �� � � , `,�
" ° ` 4 i I � � � �i ,I � ;�
u IS� Y r 1 . . I �
F 1 i �.�I � � � "i
1 � � i . . . . � � .
�
I� � � � �� � � �� � ;
f },.
H � ' r t '
� �� �� "8. - What miti�gat'ion measures are proposed to minimize the�impact? � '�'��-q
� F . � �' i�,�i�, i
, ��
il r f° =�� N� /Yl O iJ L. ''�/3 C G� � N D �/7 �� T C / 7�e' �/� //Z ,� I f��� C ��'t
I , � -�-�-� ,� ;
y � �7 r3 e � 7��,��' f�y� /Y� .S� il� C' �'7 f-) � �l � r � � _� ��
^ � ; � � �
r
, ��
" d �� � � . � � � � a+ �� � r y��
y� 7 t� � � � � �. ' � � i ' Co
I
a�' � �+ ' (�P �� � �' fi
I� '
� I 3 . . •� o ytr
i� r, ; '�( ��a r'}�
� � _ _ i �
y iFi � ,
. , I �
�� ; ����
� r � � �� �q
� .
� I� . � � n����
, � � ������ ��''��.��
, �, �_ . _ ,
� . �}', ,�,I I i;� .
, ,r� � �, r r
�
' , �' ''� i� ��. .,i
,�
�,' � . i I r
a:, k, ; i i
I� �� � 9. What are the alternativ�s to theiproposed action or project? (That is, I 4, �
,
� t other�than not doing it at all? ) �� C� I�I'�� '
��� �. � � � � 1 I t
�I � � � � �� I.. . . . , � II
il
{4�" ' � � � ��.� � � , ��� �
, � � � ' �a!
� I • . .. I� �' � � � °i� !
� + � �If 4 I�It��. .'
� I I . . , , II { I��. � j
t � I
� I Ilal�'I" �.
�� � � � � . . , ' I �; � � ' ' ��� � M1
�� � 10. . Wtiat is the relationship between local slSort-term uses of ruan's � � ����I�"° �
� � � �
� i environment and the maintenance and en��ancen�ent of long-term productivi� II �iii' �
��� '��� ' (Will the proposed short term use;deter from the maintenance and enhance = I �Iti��� !
I+ i � ��� i
d;��i t;` of long-term environmenEal goals�) � ii �� �,
h�a"° ( �� �� I , �
;
���ii "� - a'/ c?/' �7'Cr� '- i ' I��I�+�r:�
� I
p rEi � ;', . 11 I�1i �'i
G� r i� � � ��> I ' ' , _ . � � , n . � � L Q •� 1 �° q i �� 'b �
�i�l 1 ,�� . �, ����
� �j; � j � � /I/O /-r' e � S� � i�' P� v �4 ' � �� ���� '% .y � � e � �T'o Re iY'��c O � ii�� ,a h��� ��;� I
,� � � �„ � �,�,i � ��i������.. ;�
i � I . t't� � � I i
`�"� � � ��I � � � ' ��� �� � IIr���(i r �.
r0' d 1 : � ���i
3 � . � , ����� �. ��
� � � I�� � ;''.� �..� a �� � � �'�
� � � � � �
,;a�a �� , �b�,� ' ,�
� �Y � 1
� � I 11. Are there any irreversible environmen£al changes whicl� would be involved �� � �
��I i � �u
+ 1 �4 �,� � in the proposed action or project sHoul�l it be implemented? . ��, �� ; r �.
i� � � . � , - hU ���.
� � } �i; �? /� /1/ P 'C- � a�, t �t ��,
� I+ �I
' i � �� ' i� �. � �� 1i1� ' y lh' � � r
4 � �i �� � � � � � �� � �I� ` '+,
I I��, � i I' i �' 14 r,
' � � E, ,� , i �� ��.
��� i :i�� �
I u' 'I' � ,'' �I �
i I ��,� ��p� � , � . k '��d i i. i
;
p�' i�_ . I � � � 1�' � j���� i, -��
� � �; ', l � �y� �
li� �-. � j � ��; �6,��
fi � ;�' {
� � �x I � � �IJ�
�°���� 12. How will the proposed project foster eco{nomic or population growth, !`` ' 1 I �� k
t �. either directly or indirectly, in the �community? '> ',' c�e 7� '� � �� q ,�
� u f :�� � i T c �'�
� IB � . � T . .� � '.I e'L I �� �� i �T i'� � J �` �L�1
F 2., . �n.�� .'I� � I
. ,
�1 I!�. �'� . (� . 7 '� 1 � ���� i�l
r � c� c C' c�T � i �% T/> c' r T �� i.vi .�� ��<« l� /7 /V 7' �lr�t� ��
� 4 � � � , II
�� � �� . 1 C.� .L�C ��C/✓F U�'n/iJr ii TG>! / rl� P—��i� l>k'l7nJT ve .� l l� tl .t
j. � —� � . / ':Jil � �� .fi
m I. �� ', � � a,� �' I��II �
r _ - r ��
i� ', �. ; �, - ti � �. ��, i � i�l ����
I�'. �� c � �i V� bl �j�
I �✓ ��°
� I . �I i. � . � ' � i ��� I � � (y
``� �M����� 3• �3�/ , •�' '' .C�'�� � l — Q _ 7 �' � !� �� �4 �"i
/ ic p ��
�,������ ',� (Si^ at>>re of.�p��licant) U)alel � I � �C,
� �� � ��,, � �FOR CITY USI: ONLY: „ . � � � .I' I� � � �
��� � � � ,,
,�
� � � Recommended Action: { �� "
v � ' ''
�< <,�i, '+
i r . ;. � , �
��� ' �Recorded and Filed: Nlonth � ' °
i i 1i
, � , � Day � I
a �f �, �' . Year � � � .�.
4 4 - �,� , . I� � IV� �'
� u ' 1�
� i k
S `I' � � . �i �i � i �
I �.
° ti <. � � ., ., t . I I � � ��� ��
�� `
, i
{ �I �� � ��� ( � �j �� ( ,
„ fi , . � -�-,. ; �� � �
, � ' �' a ��i�' , � � �, �� , �i � �
� , ��, � '„ 'I�`
i � t , �: i
i �� � , � ;r i , ,
C � '�t � � � ���'�� I�, ^I.�
� 4
'� � � �,, t � a � i� �;" ' i �� ! i� �,
�
y ( 1 I' ��' `I i �
C,, � j, ,,� �. ) i f
�� j ` � � ` I � ' i
'� h �
� , ;� ,; i .� f� �, .
�
�y ,, � . � � � .�.
i ,,': +� k ,,
i � n �i�
„
, February 21 1978 ,' ,�' ��
, � , . ;; ���� �kR .
� � � � ���^��.
� � �! ; i � , y '�, ,
HONORABLE MAYOR AND I �', � �
; MEMBERS OP THE CITY COUNCIL 5 ',�i l 'I'
� � �,
� � �;
��� 3UBJECT: A,EQUEST FOR PARK�VAY 1^REE REMOVAL AT 107.00 LEP�ZS ROAD �h� �'� ��I��' '
i �
� � ���, Gentlemen: � ���, �� .
1 '
�i , �
��; �1 Mr. Edgar,L. Bottom, property owner at 10700 Lewis Road has submi�ted' �
! I, a request for the removal of a parkway tr`ee at his address, ��'� �
� f � l '{' 1 ' � i �
,+; Mr. Bottom states that large tree roots are damaging the Midew�,lk, � ��. {,�
+ i curb and gutter in front of his propertya The gutter dar�age hac als,o;� 41.
a � � caused probler�s. � � p �,�
i
� ,f � E
, � Inspection of the tree has revealed that it has outgrown t.he parkway� �� (
�II� � area and should be removed. � ��
� ,
I
n+ �i `I�;
�I �, Mr. Bottom has complied with Council Resolution 74--34, by �ubr.ait,t.ing � I'
:� an Environmental Impact Report. � ',°�I
4
.�
� RECOh4MENDATION ' 4 "
� �� � � � ,,�
�`Council consider removal of the parkway tree at 10700 Lew±s �c�ad. I'N���
�N �
,"
i
� ���"TsD�VARD J. VALLIERE � � � �; }�,�
f ' � I , Acting Director of Public �Vorks `�',
� , .
�
!�' �. At�achment •� f�
�' F
� ',. � �� � �
!� , f � 3 �
ry � ���I . � - J7 M � �
' �' I lly . . � ' � Y
� 1�{' �
� �; ' � ,� �
w � el� �
,
� � �'� � � F .' +� �
i' ' �t
���
ri"� . , r �
1 f � , ;
� 4
� �.�
�� ��� � � � � � � � �� �7�
����� ��� , � �.�
� A El F._ 1 1
' e
'� � ' iG
R I II� - .. . . y..
�� � I . _ , �� � � � .
'���� i �r� � � � � � �
'�� { . . ��'. �
i����
p , i F,
'i � i � i� d.y �
E l � � - . � � - s.����+,( .
�� I � � �
�� � . _ ' . " p f .�,:1
t
Y �
i ��� � ' ' � e , ,
� ��) II � �� . . , �. . �, i . �1 � �.� ��� �
� 1 � '�r . . � � i.
�� � •} � . � • �
ry . , ����
�II � �) �. , '. ' r � � i�.
II� 11",� � ; �, �.,
� i '� � ' I ��r r �
�� ��� . . � CI'I'Y OP' LYNWOUll � � ��N' �,% � �{ �
;1 � • ���'��� � � L;NVIHONMENTAL EVALUATlON (S11UfLT FO1tM) � ��� � �� �}��, �
� i I�u hp
� p�C{ "(Ylease type or Print) ' f ��if I
�,,
� . � e ' � � ��,
� I�i4 �� 1. Name of Project Proposer: - - ' �, �� " d V
I� q � �lY � ' �� � �'� ��Q
i� 11 �i E� Address: � j� dU oc �, �
d i„i� . k� �i'i
�, � �,� �{I 2. Nature and Description of Project: / f� �vJ o 1�1) �. D l" �! ��� � t ,I!;i
�� II � I ik. � ^ r . . �I � iI
�I 1 I It� /' �c� �"� f�/ l3 �S l NCI • l'� t�f) � i� �� L"' < �f
I'iIM ' �� �� � � " _ .
��� bJ c� ) / � l� C' � C, ��
lu, � � �,i ' � � ��.
u� �� � u�f /�/ l-1 S R'e' e n�� l� d��' I S �. /_) /' /i' �7 /�'1 `7'� c� e Ro���7 �;�II
iiul i � �,, . ry;�,,
I!u P ��j p�• � � � �l���
tll� 1 i i� p
,�� � ��f pw� !f�
Iq� Gil pF �,fl�
i� �� � i��, i'�I .
�t i y�� aq
�f�� "�fl 3. Address of Project: r%; s•� � ' .J ! ' U, / �' ✓ ItJO�+ (� •� �Y`
� ; � �d
�� N �,�, (If legal�description, please attac ��separately) ���,
�� � � � .�
���j ��i,� 4. Action by the City necessary for Projecf Implementation: j�� �
�;�i� � ���� � N � i� � �i � 7 /� � e /-� NJ� �l s � �,� �'�� � .S� /s < <,�i; , ��
i , , .�. ,��1 ,
r�i'�� ���N S� i/7�L �iJ Q/-- /f ��/1� n � ll� i� l3 1����,- ��� � �i�
� ,
� , �� , �ii . � 4
�v � � .I� � - . 4T9 � '� �
� iu� _ y i 1 d i
� j� �� � Ix . . � - n x �� I'� ' �
���i�i�, ti��5. Is the Project of such sign'ificance that it will have a� ��� effect on {�:� '� . �I
� � �� i � �� �i�� ' the environme�t of the City? � I � � � `�� � � �,
� «� y �j j��li Project Proposer: Yes No � j P ' i�
�� ��i r �� �,�I� � �
� � I �� � City Yes No �i �
�'��� �,� � r� If the answer is ye's, a full environmenEal�impact "'�"" , �
�� ���, vq. , statement evaluation should be completed. � � .y�r�� u� �
� i 1 r I t� .' P{, ��.
4E ,. 6. What is the environmental impact of the proposed project or action? ' � ,� �I' i ��,
` � � I
�, , f ,, u� � ,' . r/,? ;� � �? � ��`��s i� ��✓��V s� e R T � ti � �,
��� F Ii h �• %� e.� �� i�� / c � �� �, ��, �
,� r �w �i� ] ; , � . _ �
i. Y� iri�l� //) J3 /S i it/ <'l �` _ ��ccT.�� �, /�i e PJ�o •� C'�trJ N �s'F /'tcRl�� �I '�
i I� i ; ' i � -�� �- i'`�. if , �' I .
, �,��� � i , �c � l � irN �tvH� e sTJ�j , � _ � ,
"�' k^ �I''a'���;� �% ��= 7 �tc� /� ° R c Th c� Xo ��rs 1 s%/�� STr�^'e 7 � �,"�'r'IS E`�
i i��' � � r�; �"/� � 5� �"/7 e�[) /� � r�� ��-; l2 �/f�� /\ i�� D l� ✓�i S c� D f%��?/%,��a i,��e.�,��'� �
�� � � ����
,
�y� t �, i�'� R�^a T ��/-7 /✓�e.R 7'�� l/'�F Drc���,'�. ..� C ('/1cc,S'c° //�cc.>`�t���i� �'Iqi.
��� ;�'� rl� ^ ,��i� � ��
�� �� �7,: Are there apy adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided if the ���,` � ���
t;� ������ f �4� proposal is implemented? O If yes, what are��they? ' ��,i p��li
��M �la �
,� E ,� �..
�
i i � li , +�,
I � '(
,, �� , , �
�,� �j� � ��� 'li r i
' �, ! '1 q' �.
; � r�
� i; , ,;
�, ,� � � �, ��;
� r � 4 4 " � � � � � . G � .
,'
� i �! � � r � " ��
I
i , . i �IV � � � �i �� ij'
8', What mitigation measures are proposed to minimize the impact7 i � �,�
,{,� Fl ; � I Y ;�
�: , i' ��� ;�ii �� c' ir1 c� �✓� c= �7`l� e e � N D i j n n Ts�� /�c�,c �%Z � � i i� � � �i �
�, �� � � il � R E
� � /
' ;�S'�3 � c T ,�c� .f3 , n!�._�j �7' j� S' i l� c' - x> ,t�.G �S � ��� � �' E�
, , t: „� � � �
� I���� �� f i� � y��
�t; ��.
, �r i i � � 1�Y� �+ f•;,,�
r� r ' ���ik � p ' i
�������),� li�. � � �a ,` �Y � �.
��g �,�� l� . �. . . , � � ' ;�������
n3��� ; +- � � t
J N R ` �11 I � � �.,
.,.t �.��1�,.�..
;i i '
;I".}1 . � - ; � .
"�a � '
;�;I t j' , ,.
�ji;i �
I. I�� �I{ f � . .
, �. I i�.:. �. . .
_ �� � t ,
. ''� .. �I� t, ,
' !
� I
;`;,,February 21,,1978
��; � �,i ,
u;
'j .
I F,,'
4�p ��' ; HONORASLE MAYOR AND .
� ;MEMBERS OF'THE'CITY COUNCIL •
;�ii,SUBJECT:' REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF A PARKWAY TREE AT 10903 STANDARD
� j ; ; AVENUE
ii'' Gentlemen:.
,{p�,� Property owner, Mrs. Margaret P�cGurk, residing at 10903 Standard
;N+t Avenue requests removal of a Carob tree in the parkway at this
�� � location. �
r��il, i � .
�� �., Mrs. McGurk indicates that the Carob tree in question is di.seased
�:-I °; and is creating�considerable sidewalk damage.
�j ,, t
� .' Investigation oP the condition descxibed�.revealed that the tree has
?�k � raised the�sidewalk and is in fact diseased. ,
:•y '
�'I Mrs. McGurk has submitted an Environmental Impact Report in compliance �
� i with the Council Resolution 75-34,
�� ' ` RECOMMENDATION
' ;f
i��'�� Council consider removal of the said Carob tree at 10903 Standard .
� , Avenue: � .
, ,:�; �� ��
�ry� 1
��' I EDWARD J. VA LIERE ' �
��! +. Acting Director of Pub1lc�Works .
;, ,
������,�� Attachment � � �
I �;, �
., ,,,� � ,
,
��� , ,
{ ; � _..
�{ ,
j;
,� ;
�� �
� ,
;
; : �
' �
; � . . "
; ;
� .
�
� �,� i
' �
� :I
I ��" � � <t; . . � I � 1f,t*.
� ��r' , � . 1 I � . �
d �� v • 'CITY OI' LY[VWOUll • . .''
I ' • y� '
� � ' � }:NVIltONM�N'1:AL LVALUATION (S�IIORT FORM) � � '
�6 �
�! � .
, (Ylease type or Yrint) .
I q� � �� i
� I :
fi °I ,j, d. Name of Project Proposer: m Q �� �-'' ii. � ,
, � , {
f�- Address: J �
�.,,j _
, ��
" �;' 2. Nature and Description of Project:
����� � r � rnl �) a.,l c��� ��.� o � Tr��� � , ; �
;
9, � ,� � s '
� � �,
yt ., ,
m �,� `� �
; i 9 ' � II I
� ,� � � ��� , �
I! ' �•, I
a
�� • : I
'�'� � � � f;� �: � „ ��
��+ 3.. Address of Project: [� O ; S� - '_ .. �. �. ��_ 1�
�; a i 'v . ' (If legal description, please attach separately) �;�� �
i� ' �
4. Action b the Cit necessar for. Pro eeC Iin lementation: �`�
�0, ' \ Y Y� Y J , P � ��',,:' �, I
, �,� i'� 1 ). �_�n.n �{�1� 1 2e.L C'�[� �v� ! � r �
J � � � I
ii�� 1 � ;T — , i
9 e ' - '� � � �'10 � -�T ' i�. � � �
�'��;`. 1�;; . � �
� I � .' �i � � �= �� n� (Z� � o C�S • � i` �
,��,'�, � ' , � � � �
' i 5. Is the.Project of such significance that it will have a� 9 '' effect on � . �
�� the environment of the City? .� ��:)
,; ' /
(Ij{', Project Proposer: Yes No ✓ •��
�� � ' City Yes No� I
I� I If the answer is yes, a full environmental impact � �'
����;�°� �� � statement evaluation should be completed. j
� �� � � �'�
� I 6. What is the environmental impact of the proposed project or action? ,
�i � � C7 r1� l� � ,f's� � �� � � 6� a�.� — T��� � (Z� � S � . , .
' I!�l ' ! i �cLS ' '� ��- \ \ ti _ .. � ., . ,
U ,
; j,', mc�� -� ���rz� bo 1 h . � � �.
{ �� � .
�„ �;�� � � �
1 F �?_ ta :
.
I i, I . —
�"! 7. Are there any adverse envir�qnmental effects which cannot be avoided if the
�� ' proposal is,implemented? � F) .I,f yes, what are they? � , i
i
u I � ' ' �4
.�. . . , t ..I
� . �� � . . . . t P .I ; �
�� , � � .. I'.' 1
1
1 � ', �11 . '
� +���� . � . ' • � �
� 8. What mitigation measures are proposed to minimize the impact? � �
� ! �P � _ �.Pub�P • I
� �,��� � � � � I
y1���1� � .. � � �� � `� � I
. ;, s ,,, ��.��y . y "Z x v ' ' � .
�'E �
� };F1., . � , ; '�
� �
�; .
,
���, ... . � , ;
---�- � � � � �
� ., �.i. i .- � 'ti.. 1 P
• l "w•.'' . . � . ' � +� ' � 1 �
. t
� q � ���� �
J � . _ ' 1. f '.. _
. �
E �� , ' ,� S . . '� r • � . .. � �. t � �
.-� . � � . - _� . - h - ' � i
��i i�
� . �f
�.
�1 �
��- ,l , a - .,,,.. ,..�. � r � ' ' .
,�, � � � � � � � �. � ��� � �'�
�
.;,. Y �
, , ; , f
�� � , � � � , 1 � s��
r '�,� � 9. What are the alternatives to the proposed actiai or project? (That is,
�� � si other than not doing it at a117 ) �,'
>� ; � �ilr
� � � �� C', �. 1V � � F'�
� �1;�
� ! � � � � � � � �I��: � � '
� I
' �'�,� � :
n� b �
r � a j �{� <� , �";
� � � � ' � ' � � ����; `�. i�;�
�� � �` , <� �;��;
� �� , � f �� ,
� }' 10:_' What is the relationship between local short-teri�i uses of man's �f �'"
i � � ���� ,� t.
i. environment and the niaintenance and enhancenienti of long-term producti�i�
�I �. (Will the proposed' short term use deter from the maintenance and enhanc �e� �' ii
�, F � �• of long-term environmental goals? ) � � �� � � � � �� ,
,�� �� +� � � � - i � �� � �'aG�:
i �
,,.
�' , � '' � � ��� � T_ ��. `ai r ;
` �� i'
��, �,i�; � � P� ,
ua'�� �. ,.. ��' ����:�
� A� � � �� �� ��
� � r �_�
� . � � , � � � --- � ���� ��q.
I I � �� � , N � , �. tZ,'��u� �-_ , � \ � :��
, � �, . .�
� ) ��c� � � � cz 9.- � �� �!��,
i . ��� �� ,.
1 � , � , . _ . . . . . �� �1 � � j���,�
f � „� 1L Are there any irreversible environmental changes which would be involved ''a i� a
, i ' +
� a in the proposed action or project should it be implemented . �,� ��p t ,:
� f
{ � � '
�.�. � �� + � � ; 5�:
} k �.: a —�� c; S cv E1�J'�n � 1�_ee� � oT �, r. � r�o I�t a' f,� r i�_
� � a11 lrl � { ��
t,
�� �� � � � ���.�� �, o ���., �� � ����
.�,, �
� � � � � � � � � �{�I'� �' �, , ;�
��: g q , �
��l:�� ' ,�S j ������
� �,�} � � � � � � � � 1►Pil�i� ,. ��� .�'
� ; s � � �i
' � �� �,'� � � � �I ��� �, � , ,
��� a� ��,i12. F�Iow, will the proposed project fosler econoniic or population growth, ���� �� ��� �``�
' F' �� either�.directly or indirectly, in the community? � �, �� ��
� � + � �� ' � �� � � o � c. Ro � �4; � � � ��, �?
� s-,� �rnU co � rn a �
�
�
,h �� i � z .;�;�� No \o�< � ha � �T �e.A — ��� �� ����C°'� I ��� �"#�;`,
f � . � � �{ �� ,r
� II I \I . I '� . . ._�. S \ � `� C� � l� - , C { `� � � ����
`i t ° � � � � . . . y � r{ '�-
1 1 `�
(� �' u� � �I 4
i r ���I �� � �P� �t' �\� o 'C� C)�'c SU_�'(`{\��, ' . ' AI'��I�il � ��
i r � . r. � ��I � .
u � � n .� ' ' . . .. � � � ���� � � ' �� ��
Y
� rf �� � �. 1 a3. � / <� . � . �� �� � � � 1 �I II �� w
L
' ���� , � (Sir- ature of .Applicant) � (Date) ������ �i �l . �1
� �� i �; ��' FOR GITY USL ONLYi � � � � � � ���4I��� � ��}�
�'i �� � � � � . , � . ���`+,� �a ��,�
{ � , . . , . . � 'i
',�'i FtecommendedAction: r
� � ��M s}
Y�� �
I� �� �. . . . 1� lI� a� ('��
� � �
�' � I�, Recorded. and F_iled: MQnth � j;' �� a�� ��� •&�
, i o
� � Day � � � �� �+ � � I r�?�.
t r .Year ! ; I� i If,:
; � � � �������
r
r
� � �� B '�' � � � � ���i� ; , i G:�;
�, ", ! , � � ,�
� ���a, � --- ----- �_— _..__ f��' ��'� �1�"�;
��
I _ '
� i �` � ,��. � -__ _ -__�_ � � � . .' i � (�� �' �
�� � . , , � � � �,
�� `�i � . ''_ 1 � �.
I . � _ . • ' . • � I �i � iI I ��I.
� I p
4 �� ��V'.�. � � _ . �. — ,,. � �� ��! i
v i �
ry ry
�I �
��� ��� 4 I d� ��,'�
l �
I � �� ���'' � � ' �� � � ��'I
1�j i, �J
" j I' . . � a� �� �,{
i �� � � � � �,
� I
� ' � � �I' ,
; �I Ii � �� 'I R �i
� .�
� �"'� ��I� I� ' � �
� February 21, 1948 ,; , '��
�� ! � . �' �i� 1, � '( I
� � .;.
� � � " � �,
,� HONROABLE MAYOR AND ��� � 1 d� I
�� � ��'�,��� MEMBERS OF THE CITY�COUNCIL � �I�', � ��'' X
��� �,� � SUBJECT: REMOVAL REQUESTS OF A�PARKPIAY TREE AT 11056 HULME AVENUE � �� �
,i �
� ��� Gentlemen: ��,`, ; ftij I
� ! � � � I
; �i�� Mr. Richard De La Vega, property owner at 11056 Hulme Avenue has I, `� r
��' submitted a request to the P.ublic,Works Department, regarding the '�I i'r;
,I[,��I�j rer�oval of a parkway tree in front of his residence. '���
���i��; Mr, De La Vega states that the Carob tree has outgrown the availabLe I�
P�i
�� parking space. In addition, Mr. De La Vega mentioned that the tree� r��
�l roots have caused damage to the curb, gutter and sidewalk.
'i �� � �
yl Mr. De La Vega has complied with Council Resolution 75-34 by submitting: �
,���� an Environmental Impact Report. !f� � ��i
i r I
{ �
�ti�' �RECOMMENDATION � ��� � �
I
�'�g:� Cnuncil consider removal of the Carob tree at 11056 Hulme Avenue, i� �
I�
�i"�I� �� .u�. �; ;,,
�� �
��'��I��{���.� EDWARD J. VKLLIERE ���� I i , I
�it� Acting Director of Public Works � I
,� i
I ��;�� Attachment �
� II�' •I
I;I'! �f��� I
^ �.s f I
i � G
k������ ��� � � a
�
� i li'flh��, , ' , h. . � . . , . .. .r�: �, I
'i'i;j�i�, � �
� ',I! ,� I
�I� � ,�
I, f i
��pa
��iF��ii,t� � . � � � ���
� �
"� II�II�°�. � . � . . ; � � . � � , - . ..,I
I �
ij"C �� �„ . . . � , . , . . � . . � _ - . � ,�
i
���.,' . . _ _ . .. � . . . . � . � . . . . �
� �
i
��t �� ��� , _ � � , � . , . � o,.' _ . )
I ,��i � . . . . - �
I k� �;.' ' ' . , . . � , . . - , I
' ' ' � . . � � . ��
; I �', I
�� '
� I
; ^''' � I
w�.; - - -� � . _ _ ,
� , r ._ . t , �
., � , ;
� l j r - � C,1'1' Y. O L� l Y N W Ol� ll. { �/ � �}
� �-•� � � LNV11L(�NMITIV'1'AI, L:Vf11_Ut1'.1'ION (SIICJLLT I�LNl) ( ;�� ��, � �
, 1 , ; I � '� i
; I ;�;, , .(Ylease ty��e or Yrint) , !f�
I ^,� � ` " 7
I _
�
� ��E�;�� � ;1. Name of 1'roject Proposer:'�� ��� � ' �� ,� � �
s�
I 1), Address: /a G P L.��.�- !'
-
I. �ii � , . . . . ,� .
;{;� � ,`l. Nature and Description of Project: �--�—,P P r-c „�� d� �
� Si ' ;
,� t _ ;
_ �
� '
i
�� ;�
i�:'
w � . . i
�'�
�';i �
���"
, �
�� ! 3. Address of Project:' /��, F - � y�,�„_ r �F �. , _f
� (' (If legal desciiption,, please attach s paralely)
:��� � �
'��` + 4. Action by the City necessary for Project ImplementaEion:
���,'� � . .� .Pr . « � e '�.P"r f . � ..rm.a .
j?' • .� .
!;!
' � � MJ .
1 � �
��
, 5. Is the Project of such significance that it will have a uiL+a�-' �} effect on �
•��'; the environment of the City?
��,,� , �
;.
�. �.,, Yroject Proposer: Yes . No
�� ., City Yes ,� No I
,('"�j � �
, i I£ the answer is yes, a full environmental impact
�� f statement evaluation should be completed.
; ';f ,"�� �
i
'_"'. i 6. What is the environmental iinpact of the proposed project or action?
;
i . _ ° " .� � ! .� {
. ,
" � C'y`.r�,�- n l S' � � �� /,r i c ' d .r � ,r,9 � r,�- •
�� / �
�� � �J M< c. �I�P . � i�i ., 7r � i�r e 75 i C iv��T 'Y�� 7,t�i�'F N�-.I f � I
� !.1 � '� �o � �7- F.+ f � �``.� �� � � a � P c... -fr m - � �.. , .s
f � , � •
, ' "4 � t .. �� I
I
.�� j � . � . � � � . I
, � .� I
•�� 7, Are there any adverse environmental effect's �vhich ca��i�ot be avoided if the �
-. j proposal is implemented? / If yes, what are they? I
I
�� �
�
I
.
> �
8. Wliat mitigation'measures are proposed to minimize the iYnpact?
� . � ,'
:.
----- - � - ---- ---- --- — .�_ -°----- �
;,� ; . , i ;�
MY . . � � � ' . ' .
1� . . . ' . ' i . .
� ' �
�'
r „ ` ),
r�
;; � 9. What are the alternatives to tt�e proposed action or project? ('1l�at is, f
�,
,, , other tlian not doing it at,all'?) , � / �
, .�!
a: !�� .
�.' <� .
�r! . y
� !.;
,
. ��� ���
;iU , •
. � � �.,�4. - �. . .
J .r ' ' . . . - p
;"��'�� 10. What is the relationship between local sliort-term uses of man's
���;,`, envii and the maintenance and enhancenienl of lonfi-tern� productivi' ��
�'' (Will tlie proposed shoi•t terin use deter from the maiiitenance and enhance r t
�� � • of long-term environmeiital goals?)
M �
I � �'f� ,
� � � . ` ',
� �I.� ��;
, � ' � , d � � r
„ ���,.
���. `��� � � � � ,
�� 1 ' ,�1�;
II , �
�� , ,
11. Are there any irreversiUle enviro�imental chan�es which would be involved .
.�'i in the proposed action or project sliould it Ue impleniented'? �
, �: : ,///,v�
��:� � � .
; �
����i �.
, a, .
�4 -,
� r� ;. . - . � . ' ' �.
� � ..�. . . . .
. � i,�„� . . . . - �
I � s
��, d
���� ;�� . p�
1 '� 't �
1 'i �� , � . . ' . , ,
�� � Ui 12. Ilow will the proposed project £oster economic or population growth, •� I
�� ' either directly or indirectly, in the community? �� ,�
` Ii , ' �: �,��,,
,�f��r„�. � � �
�
li �9' 'ti . ' - ' .
J i� � .
�i �f . , , � �
j(1�ii�� � �:�� �
��r� a v�
.i il �� � ei � .. � � . � � � ' I
. tl ��,. ,; . .
I �
/�? / f
�� ����� � � � . ' . . . � ' ..
�� � I � /� � , . �, .
i , „. 13. ,�� .,-j � `�_` /J - 6 7 7 i
( , -r �
� , + �: „ ,
,, u (Si�>> itnre of .�pi�licant) (1)a
i� �����'�,I� � FO1Z CiTY USL ONLY: � � � �
;-
� • i , lZeconimended Action: i
ir ,:�' �
p,� �ia
,!� : �
'��+��; Itecorded and I'iled: A�lontli i
� u � � � � Day � � � � �
„� ; Year
� ''�' � I
,
�, I
� : . L
,,
�. � �
�i i;
�� �.;: .� :� � , � �
,,, ,
��� CITY OF LYNWOOD
, i '!
� ', INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
,,� �
;
' DATE: February, 1978
���' ' TO � Art Nelson � � � � � � .
� q�
,� � � FROM: Darrel Englert
�
I 1' SUBJECT: WATER DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT JANUARY� 1978
�h��, ,�, . , • , . .
I 4
:�i� ��. � � � A. Leaks . .
�'•�"I' 1. 11600 Block Pope and Virginia alley
i„� � �°�',��� 2. 11585 AtlantiC � �
,��,�,�������� � a. Leak located on property side of ineter tail �
i'' 3. 12041 Cornish
q iy,' � �
a. Iron pipe service leak
y � � 4. 2900 Block Lynwood Road
'������'�'��t a. Copper service leak
-,�!� ;`� 5. 11400 Block Virginia alley
,�;� �i�, a. 4" gate valve packing leak
;,��rg ;,; 6. 11168 Louise
f aud i,� a. Service pulled fcom meter by sidewalk contractor
7. 11128 Louise
,il'; f' a. Service pulled from meter by sidewalk contractor
�"'� 8. 2987 Imperial
jd�' I' a. Service pulled from main by demolition contractor
<< p 9. 11200 At2antic
�y;,,i, a. Repair leak as public relations jester
I, �;� 10. Fernwood and Ernestine
a. Repaic small main feeding two services to west of intersection
, �' 4 I� 11. Pope and Virginia alley at Cortland
"" ;� a. Repair 2" main line leak
1 �; I.
. ��-' r.� . B. General � � .
�; l. Telemetry
�
, a. #9 well blown fuse
� b. #6 well switching relay stuck
c. #4 well receivec failure
` � 2. #19 Well
�,� a. Install catch basin as per request from State and County .
, F� Lnspection
,.
3. Maps
� a. Bring maps up to date .
�� 4. Lynwood, Compton water interconnection '�
'�'"' a. Perform maintenance on 12" clay valve
�� ��.:��.I 5. #5 well �� � �
; . i .;,._' ' � , a. Installation of new sand separator under construction
;� i . 6. Hydrant cepairs' �
� i, , a. Lynwood Road and Little Alameda, etraighten .
�, b. wisconsin and Long Beach Bl, new seat gasket
�: . c. .Minnesota and Long Beach B1, new seat gasket �
� ! i��t� " d. Fernwood and Long Beach alley, new seat gasket
1 Iy
I .. �..II . . � .
�'� . ,.
� • o
; �,
,�
Page 2
4''
7. Flushing ' � ' � " �
��= a. #1 Elevated Water Tower
�1' b: Atlantic to Alice, Fernwood to C1ack, to prevent dirty water
��� ' c. Century at Hulme, Gertcude,�Cornish, and AnneEta,�routine �,.
i „ � maintenance to main deadends
� d. Abbott Road at San Luis, San Miguel, San Vincente, and
Mallison, to prevent dirty water complaints.
i' 8. Service Taps
�'. a. ll420 Long Beach Bl.
' r b. 11424 Long Beach B1.
��.� � ROUTINE MONTHLY SERVICES: 2-205 Al �
; : A. Read monthly meters
B. Backflow prevention
� �� . C. Drawdowns , .
D. Samples, regular plus 15 samples for County Health Department
E. Notification for non payment-23
F. Tuxn offs for non payments-9 -
i -
SEWER MAINTENANCE: 2-205 E9 � � -
, A. P[eventive maintenance .
�� 1. Atlantic from Feinwood to Lavinia, east side �
2. Long Beach to Peach, Lynwood Road to Cedar, Cedar to State Street
B. Stoppages
1. Lindbeegh and Josephine
. . 2. Redwood and State � .
3. Atlantic and Fexnwood
4. Imperial and State
� , C. Other � �
l. 12417 Cookacrs
- ,�� � ,a, Check�for sewec connection . �
, � 2. 3047 Flower '
�� a. Help property owner with odor problem
� � 3. 3207 Sanborn � � '
�,I , a. Correct sewer stoppage on City owned property
,�
; i'I TRAFFIC SIGNALS: �.1-160 E13
�� A. Flashers
� ; 1. California and Nocton
� a. Shot out
. t� ;
� � � STREET LIGHTING: 4-163 � � � �
. ti �( � A. Outages . . . � ..
� '. L. #107 on Century . . �
i�. ' 2. #42 on Imperial �
,'i1 3. #13 on Elm
� 9. Century fxom Long Beach to Norton -
�{��� 5. Safety at Fernwood and Bullis . ,.-
}� 6. #1 on Sequoia and Long Beach
�� � B. Hit and cun knockdowns �,�
1. #56�on Imperial
�j 2. 10300 Sequoia
C. Library lighting � - -
� r�� , �1. One pole installed -
2. One pole on order
�; +
� � . . �
; .{ •
'"� Page 3
i
�� . � COMMUNITY PROMOTION: 2-201 M4 � �� � � �
�� A. Candy Canes-
�' l. Removed and stored
� B. Banner
� ��� -� � 1. Hang banner for sidewalk sale at Lynwood Plaza � � -
� C. #5 Elevated Water Towee
,� l. Stanaby while safety-climb pictures were being taken
� � W.D.O. 130 A . ' � �,�.
A. Street light knockdown, pole #103 on Century
l. Completed
-�'� � � B. Street light knockdown, pole #16 on Long Beach B1 �',
1. Replacement pole on order
�� C. Street li ht knockdown, ole #17 on Atlantic �
� 9 P
1. Replacement pole on order
� D: Hydrant knockdown, Alpine and Carlin, Hit and Run
E. Hydrant knockdown, Carline and Atlantic
1. Repaired by Park water company
� . ATLANTIC STREET LIGHTING CONVERSION: 6-150�-.208 �
: � A. .Phase III � � .
' 1. Between Elmwood to Los Flores, completed
j� � B.� Phase IV � � �
� � 1. Under construction �
}
� • WALNUT WATER LINE: 2-209-756 ' � � � " �
� A. Tie end at Virginia is completed
! l. Two services to be changed over
; '
,
• � � DUNCAN WATER LSNE:. 2-209-755 . ,
A. Matecials on order
i
5�
: ;
' �]615cIN25d-Sf1.A0-a2P121)21. P$$�77 � � . . ..•. I .
• ' �UNTY OF + LOS ANGELES �� , � .
SHERIFF'5 DEPARTMENT
� DATE February 7, 1978
� OFFICE CORRESPONDE�NCE� FILE N0.
FROM: William R N�r, Captain T � : Ed Valliere, City Manager
Commander�wood Station City of Lynwoo3
SUBJECT: ACTIVITY REPORT FOR JANUARY 1978'
Crime Situation
JAN. 1978 . DEC. 197 DIF. JAN. 197 DIF.
Homicide 2 1 +1 1 +1
Robbery
Armed 18 15 +3 20. -2
Strongarm 14 . 13 +1 28 -14
Burglary . 152 133 +19 177 -25
Rapes 4 1 +3 4 , +0
Other Sex Offenses 2 3 -1 N/A
Felonious Assaults 37 31 +6 27 +10
Theft, Vehicle 37 46 -9 32 +5
Theft, Grand 17 14 +3 21 -4 .
Arson 2 2 +0 N/A
Vandalism IS 21 -6 N/A
Total Seven Majors 281 254 +27 310 -29
Major, crime rose markedlv in January 1978, from the lower than expected,December 1977 .
' totals. Burglary accounted for most of the increase, but felonious assaults and rob-
° beries also increased. It is important to note, however, that .Tanuary 1978, reported
crime levels are substantially below January 1977, levels. Burglaries, singularly, de-
, creased by 25. Robberies were down 16. Total seven majors decreased by 29. Only
� felonious assaults, up 10 and vehicle theft up 5, increased appreciably. It should be.
� noted that the Special @nforcement Bureau provided up to six (6) additional two�(2)
, man units on a single shift specifically for robbery prevention. During those times �
� � when SEB was presen4 robberies were virtually nonexistant. When they were not oper-
ating within the City, robberies were rampant. There were no reported acts of graffiti
�� during .7anuary. , � . .
1 �
. , ' . .� ..'. • �' � � . , � . . � � . .
. . . . . . . .i ,., . ' '
' a :Ed Valliere, CiCy ManaQer ;
� ActiviCy Report for January 1978 . '
" FebruarY 7, 1975 _
'i Page 2
' Called for Service .
� Dec. 1977 Nov. 1977 Dif.
� � � 2135 t�2069�� � +66
� � � �
" The"average response time in the City of Lynwood for the month of December was 5.2
" minutes, the average response time for the four (4) separate patrol areas ranged
from 5.0 to 6.0 minutes. Comparable November 1977, statistics reflected'a response
of 4.6 minutes to 4.9 minutes for the four (4) areas with an average of 4.8 minutes
for the City as a whole.
� � � � �
� Allocation of Services '� �
,,
In the' month of December 1977, 255,969 minutes of service were given the.City of
� Lynwood, the contracted for level of service is 246,360. The December 1977, break-
. ' . down is: , � � . � ' .
" ' Patrol 74,322
Handling 163,409
Station Service�: 18,238
Total 255,969
Arrests '
i
Jan. 1978 Dec. 1977 Dif.
' " Male Felony � 85 111 -26
Female Felony 17 24 -7
i' Male Misdemeanor 112 121 -9
' , Female Misdemeanor 12 24 -12
. ° Juvenile 92 92 +0
� Total 318 372 -54�
`s _
r Traffic � _
',
Jan. 1978 Dec. 1977 Dif.
—
�t Traffic Accidents 56 66 -10
t4 Injury Accidents 32 27 +5
, Injuiies 40 33 +7
" Fatalities 0 0 +0
' � Hazardous Citations 1274 910 +364
: Radaz Citations 640 487 +153
� Parking Citations 349 333 +16
� ` Abandoned Vehicles Stored � 12 . . 5 � - '��
'� Included in the parking citation total were 166 citations issued for parking on front
lawns. _
. , ,. 11 . � . . � ' �
_ i
�
.'` ' _ � � � �
Ed Valliere, Ciry Manager.
Activity Report for January 1978I �' ':
February 7, 1978 '
� Page 3 �
The hazardous citatior.s included 15 citations issued for various cortmiercial vehicle
enforcement violations, of which 8 were for overweight.
Fines & Forfeiture, Traffic Safety Fund
�' Jan. 1978 Jan. 1977 Dif.
—
� 15,215.20 8,819.72 +6,395.52'
a�!� 1/3/78 - Patrol penuties arrested four (4) Compton males and recovered three (3)
stolen vehicles after the Deputies observed one of the stolen vehicles
,;!,' being driven erratically.
I .
�,�� 1/8/78 - Two patrol vehicles collided at the intersection of Long Beach Boulevard
flnd Imperial Highway while responding with red lights and siren to an
"Officer needs help" call. There were no serious in�uries. Damage to
' a ; the radio cars were extensive.
y, .
���� 1/10[78 -A male adult reci.dent of Van Nuys�was arrested�by patrol deputies after a
��"?� "Mini crime wave" during which he committed rape, assault.with a deadly
I � weapon, and a number of burglaries.
t; jj, .' ' . ,
1
�� 1/12/78 - Denutv Robert Lopez and members'of the Southeast Animal,Control District
��i �;.�� gave a puppy to a❑ elderly,.blind, Lynwood couple after their inability
����v� to protect themselves was brought to Deputy Lopez' attention as�the result �
i
1 ,., of a burglary committed against them. � . �� -,
�,ii� 1/16/78 - A 17 year old Lynwood resident was arrested'for grand theft auto and
t assault with a deadly weapon against a peace officer after patrol_
.�!�{� � deputies attempted to stop him for a petty theft. A long, hazardous
pursuit in a blinding rain storm ensued and as a result a minor traffic
���C�` collision occurred between the suspect's vehicle and a radio car but there
���,� were no injuries. . '
' ���;
I 1/17/78 - A 14 year o1d Lynwood resident surrendered to Lynwood Station Detectives.
, � ,���, The,suspect was wanted in the murder of a 7 year old Monrovia girl in .
",!� December, 1977.
i �}
����,.I'�� 1/21/78 - Pursuant to a�request from St. Francis Hospital,,.a Sheriff's Department
�i�� Choctaw heli.copter, assigned to Aero Bureau, picked up a 2 year old in-
�'II�N.� fant and a medical team for transportation to Children's Hospital of
I �. Los Angeles. Lynwood City Park was used as a landing site.
�I� ��I'1/25/78 - A male adult got into an argument with the owner or a local business,
� (Budget Auto Sales). The suspect fatally �stabbed a bystander and wounded
� .!`��� . the�owner. He subsequently surrendered to Detectives. � � �, � .
a+
�1.1/27/78 - Undercover Deputies acting on information, arrested two (2) male suspects,
i
� neither of whom lives locally, for possession of heroin for�sale. Deputies
^�, purchased a quantity of heroin and recovered narcotics worth $250,000.
1
;
, � ,;
� ��
I, �' '
�I
E I, � � . �
'''�
�„ . • O �
' .,:.'il i .
����i�� i . . . - . ' . ..
Ed Valliere; City Manager
Activity Report for January 1978
� February 7, 1978 .
� iii Page 4
��1 ', . , �'
� 1/28/78 - An adult male resident of Lynwood,was shot to death by three suspects
�L����I��� � as he and his wife attempted to flee an attempt armed iobbery outside
;, a local liquor store. InvestigaEion is continuing.
�
� 1/28/78 - Patrol Deputies arrested five suspects and recovered PCP worth approxi-
'�I�ill mately $1,000,000 at a Lynwood residence.
, i
: fl �, . ' . . . �
��,"��? ' WRW/JAH/ait �
I ( :,
i�_
i�,t � �
,
,,.. „
�I
i � ��
l ll '� �
;;; �,
4'Gj" ,
������ � � �
!, !
I��
��►j���
�� �
, .
;��
.���,
i, �„
�„
�.
�
�. :
li
� .
. i�� ��li _ ' . . . . .
, Il ' .
' i �... . . . � . .
���a,
'.�N ��� ; �
i . �
,�
,
��,�� � � �� � � � �
,
,
�.
t
,� �
,,, ,, .. .
.,,, ,
;;, _
I
. � ` C I TY OF CYNW�O O
'SEVEN MA�oR'S -
I 977-1 978
1976 -1977 = - _
3l0
� � ��
� � �� �� i \
- 280 - -- // �� �� ���
2T0 - - -- - _ ��� �� �� �� .
_ � � // �� �
��oo
-//- --� �
�bfl // NA_-
�l �� ii
��40 ��
// ,` ., - -
�30
��` �� i \\
��0 �� �
.
� I o ���
VG �j, _ � �,� � 20•_ ��` _ 9 . ��� . .�. _ �,O _ �' \
� -= -
� . -� L-_ (�-- v
--
_ � __...___ � � . _
-- ..
_� � � � -
F
�-.- �. . . - _ _. _ : _ - - �
� z_ .-._- >-. _ __ _,
- . _ - - -- - - • :
� � : C1TY OF LYNWCj.00
: Ro8C3ERY : -
I 9 7?-1 9 7 8 -____
1976-1g77 ._ — _
�
_ � �
40 — �� ���
//
_� / _
'.__.. S � ._ '._� �_� �� . . , . �' . _
. ., . � � _ _ .. �� , . :.
.
: 35 _ `\ \
// � _��,__ �--- � � . •
� 3o ii � � � �
�1 A _-_
5 \� / �. o
�
20
15
lo
�. � . �� O � . Zo; p � 9 � . � . . � ,�
, c, �x. : __�. L _ _ _ _ 9,� 9�
� .c �_ . T; .� . y�
� �.
�,
. ,
, ,
-.. , . a ` . � . - .. .. �_... ,. . . . " _ ... _. .�._ , .,a -, ._. . . . � '. . 'e. ' .''k
.��_
_ .. ��� ��_ . m.. � _
v�� Y �� �5.� __ �� ,� . J� � � .� ;., � � � . _ . _ . _
�� � d- `t� �'' n 4 2 O `'',�, � �
n
, -
�
00{ _
_- //
� 011
/�
�' Oz 1 '��
_ _ _��. _�� _ ��._ _ ,0��
� // /
,.yty - -,
_ � __ _ ��= _ .._�_ / ---� 0�1
� -- ` � _: - - - - _ � _ii _ _
_ � -- �- �� - . .
- . � �\� \ �/ ` - _� __ � _ , 0�1 = .
�
�� ir 091
�\ // �� � /�
. ` °L, e
_ — = 1 L61 = 9L6( ._
' SL6 1=1.L61
- -= :�,����an� : , . .
O O�MIyJ�� � O J.11 � ; ,
i,
� ". C I TY O F LYNWO�,O O '
: ?�WEF''r, VENtCL�
19 � .
197�0 - 1977 =. -- _
� 55 �
50 .
i
�5 �/ ��
��
:lo � ` . / � � \\
- `� _ _ �� i NA
i
� �� .
♦
�- � ir .
2b � �
20 -
15 �
,
�'G � � �S` p 2 p �
- - �� �-� _�'. c`. o�.-F �, ��. �' �. �, ���
� . � L � �G �9,� y�
.
. �
., .
_;. . . - �-� � �..
- .�� �
...�. '�- = i,.,_y-�s- _ :' �� k-.,,-�- _ . _ � � ... . . .. _'• ; -- , .,.: ,-:.�. n- ,-`--•--= .` �::�.a � x -�x� �. ;.: .
i ,, r .- :.. , .:
,
I � • _ CITY,OF LYNWOOD O
� , . . .
{
@ �. DEPARTb9ENT MFMO
',k ' .
�� DATE: February 14, 1978.. � � '�
j y u s .
` q'p; Edward Valliere, City Manage� +��
� �,� � � � � �
,_ FROM: Keith Johnson, Fire Chief �
,, .
� ; � w
i � SU&7ECT: RAZN FALL i �.0 _ � �"
i � You may be interested in informati�'on on our recent storms. Rain
�" fall figures are kept on a fiscal�yea`i, June 30 to Ju1y ls Follow- ��
� ing is the rain we have had sinc'��Jaluary 3rd, 1978.
I '
:'� '�;'" � � TOTAI. IN lNCHES
��° DATE TIME AMOUNT '' TOTiAL IN INCHES LAST YEAR
� ` .. - - � , I;
�, 1-3-78 7:30 pm .19� ; 8.45 4.36 '�
� 1-5-78 '- 7:30 am .51 ` 8.96 4.36
p ,
,ff 1-6-78 7:30 am .19 � 9.15 5.24
��> 1-7-76 J:30 am .75 � 9.90 6..25
��;" , � 1-1D-76 7:30 am 1.36 11.26, 6.25
'�' ' 1-11-78 7:30 am .42 -. 11.68 6:25
t� `
;� 1-13-78 7:30 am .O1 11.69 6,25.
� �. 1-14-76 4:30 pm 1.24 12.93 6.25.
- 1,� 1-]5-78 7:30 am 1.00 13.93 6.25
1 1-16-78 4:30 pm 1.35 , 15.28 6.25
� 1-17-78 7:30 am .02 15.30 6.25
`� 1-19-78 7:30 am .52 15.82 6.25.
� . _
�� 1-19-78 6:30 pm .13 15.95 6.25
�
j�: 2>5-78 7:30 am .08 � 16.03 6.25
i} 2-6-78 7:30 am 1.48 17.51 6.25
i�
� 2-6-78 6:30 pm .52 18.03 6.25
t �' � ' �
I � 4 ' 2-5-78 7:30 am .98 19.01 6.25
$ 2-9-78 7:30 am 1.80 20.81 6.25
� � 2-10-78 7:30 am 4.36 25.17 6.25
i� � 2-13-78 7:30 am 1.11 26.28 6.25
�¢� 2-14-78 7:30 am .20. 26.48 6.25
� �E - ,
t� Our average rain fall should be 15 inches. 1974 was the last year '
� I
��� we had.a 15 inch rain fall with 15.04 inches. �
'¢�� , �� �
{�S�� ��� �
; Respe�tfull,'
,,F K�ith Johnsn . Fire fhi.ef
:': (. . . •� .
,al.(� . , O.
6{ _ '
�`' Califo�nia
,
��;��'���. � � � Contract� Cities � �
�; ,
�,�� Assoc�ation
,,
;,'° � 2468 Huntington Drive �; San Marino, California 9ll08 �r Telephone 285-7141
1� _
4 � I I � ARCFiIE E. BEASOR
p�� SANTA FE SPRINGS,PqE51UENT . ,
�
)I CHARLES BELBA
1 LOMITA,IST VICE PflE51DENT
� - Februxry 15, 1978
RICHAR� LAUGHTER
� WALNUT.2NOVICEPRESWENT � '
� �� 1 ENNIS NEFF �. � . '. _ . - . - .,.. . . ..._ . ,. . . ..
SIGNRLHILLSECRETAqY CONFIDENTIAL MEMO
�I�� CECIL N. GftEEN �
NORW�LH.TflEASURER �
ceoR�evoi�r TO: ALL MAYORS
E%ECUTIVE DIFEGTOR
FROM: FRED GUIDO
IMMEDIATE PAST PRE5IDENT
�� As one who has gone through the chairs in our Contract Cities Aesociation
' and has served as president duringthe immediate past administration, I know thp
amount of time and work, and ±he largely unrewarded effort that a president puts
��a� into this Aasociation. It has become the practice in recent years for the Immedi-
� ate Past President to initiate and oversee a testimonial type presentation for the
'�" outgoing president to show him that the cities recognize and appreciate the time
� and effort he has put into the Association not only during his term as pxesident but
': also during his years in the other officer seats.
� I proposing, therefore, that_e.very member city that feels so inclined be .
prepared to presentaplaque or a resolution or some token of recognition and appre'
,, � ciation to our outgoine president, Archie Bea�or, at his "swan song " meeting on
April 19th.
,� Archie has been a very dedicated and hard working president, who set a
!,i! number of goals at the beginning of his term and has really tried to meet those
goal the past year with considerable success. I think he deserves this
i 4 recognition and I hope you wili join me in extending it to him.
-',, �: E � . � .
''','-� For program planning purposes, we do want to knos� which r_ities will be
'making presentations at the meeting, acid I woula appr.eciate it if you would let
, 4 me know, throughGeorge Vogt ai our Contract �_i�i.es offices, whether or not yo�ar
�' city v�ill be making such a pzesentation.
II
'i'�
i
.
I„
I ���� J •' ' , . . � � • ' . . . I ' ����.
{,�� �
k � .
!
,',�
' February 21, 1978 '
','� ,.
�
,
,�� 01 . � � . . �
' ii.�� . . - . " . . � ..
� i � � ' . . . . . . . . ' .
,��� HONORABLE MAYOR AND
�� :� MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
'� SUBJECT: FREEWAY PRQPERTY RERENTAL - 11435 CHECK AVENUE' j
,� . {
,,, y : r. ,
' I Councilmen:
' I
�.� A request to rerent surplus freeway property at 11435 Check Avenue
�` from a Mr. Louis Rosan of Lou Rosan Screw Products Company,
� Bellflower has been received by this department. , '�
� "I
�;� Mr. Sid Schwartz of CALTRANS has been contacted and indicates th�at i
;!� the property is .available for rerental. Mr. Rosan wiLl only be renting �
the building located at the front portion of the property.� .(See
� �� ' plot plan)
�
��I Mr. Rosan has pointed out to staff that the reason for relocation is due
,, i to the fact that his prior business location has cHanged in ownership
!�;��' and the.new owner is altering the use of the building.
; i ����1 . � � � � � '
i �
!,pi Staff has inspected subject property and observed several broken
'�!"�I windows throughout the building. The structure is steel frame on
� 3�� concerete slab with corrugated steel siding and roof. Ample parking
+�' { now exists with potential for at least ten employees.
��i„�
,�
_ � .
i I w�� Recommendation
;!fllli
�'jlf�� Tliat the City Council review the proposal to rerent surplus freeway
i
' i'� - property at ll435 Check A'venue and favorably consider the application G
r t;: submitted by Lou Rosan Screw Products Company. �
,j,
i Y
' ��a�(�'� EDWARD J. VA.LLIERE � E
� '! City Manager,
.; : ;'I , � �¢,���z
i `� ��•.v��.c��
, i� MICHAEL J. HAACK
�� Planning Technician � �
��
I�� Encl. •
� � � .
�� ��
� �C'� I
` �� ,
' j . I
i, u I
�u
�� ;� � � I
��" "� � . � � � � � �
� ��
�� .
� ��
�� � .
,
�,�� ;
�
��;,�4 +' - . ' � � .�� t
��. � . � . . . .
i: . �
;;� "inu r.osnri sct��:i �uo�crcrs a�.
, . .
i��k 14626 LAICEiDOD BLVD. SELLF'IG�I'ER, CALIF. 9070G . TEIFPfiONE: 21:�-634-449�
i ,.
I!�� •' Precision Productior. of All Kinds. ,;i'
�����;�� 3orew �N:a�chine Producta�� � � � � `-��''�
i
u
j�j�� � � � February 14,. 1978 r�� -�
1 �i �`", .
MI
�r Re: Buildin�, Rent � :�
t �i . e -;;Y
� k � �
t "C City of L}rnwood �Y:.
�, e Planning C: Zoning Department �'¢�;..
� �� � 11330 Bttllis Road • � �
�� L,ynwood, Calif. 90262
� ' � ,�
� � P.".r. b4ike Hsack: � �
1 �,
i , � � Gentle:nen; � � E�� �� �
i �' • •
� c�fe �vouTd like to rent the building nt 11435 Check Ave. in the oity of '+ �',
; w1 ;�,
�. �
,j�� L;�nwao�i, from Cal-Trans (Mr. Sid Schwartz) 120 3. Spring 8t. Los Angeles�
G ��j� � Calif. 90051. Talephone 620-4830 or 620-3709. '
I��i�� 1Ye nre �n Rutosa tic screw machine shop. }�'e have 5 multiple spindle suto- ,
yV�(
I,��hG i m�stics svoh as 1- 1" New Britnin Gridley� 6 spindle, 2'- 1 1�4" Acne
���y Gridle}�s 6 spindle, 1- 1 1�2" Conor.mtic 6 spindlo end 1.- Z 1�4" New
r�
�� Br3t�in Gridlay 6 spindle. Also znd. operrxtion equipment consisting of
1 mills and lathes.
��°��� � � � �
�y rie are a�ob shop� uuznufscturing hardware euch as festners (nuts & bolts)
rw ��
' and fittin�s.
�k� �
I @ ' ^ .
�!i9 YPe v�ill hnve two to four employees.
�
niple
�'„I . VPe have been in business a•t 14626 Lakswood Blvd. Bellflower, Calif. for
iu � �
� the past 10 ,years. YTe must leave due to change of onnership of the:
.�+, y ,
�'i" property. Thank You.
1 ! .. .
I ; Ven,/ trul,� yours,
1
� �c.�•--- �Z'�-� ���--
, r -
,�
i � �'p',
Louis Y�. Rosa'n
1. , �
t
� ..
�;
, z
, ��'
l i ' �
' 1 . � .. . , . ---- -- ---- - -� _.-.— ,
. t � . . � . . . .
. � f� < r_ �_,�. .�— p � � , � s g a ' . ; - .
� " � J � i
, -,
� � . . .. _ . _ ,....: �.._ �" ' . . _.�_ .. <__ .
�
,,.
-. . ..._ ...
_
- - _ _-- _- � . ' __' . ; . - . . . � � . � . , . , . , , . . _ _ ' _' _
___, � _� . _ _ .._._:. .,.... _. . - _ -._:. . . . .. .. . . _. -- � � ' .
-.__:. :.. " . "'" ...
,' ; � , , � , �._,�Al. SCr2:w/ _l�7ZD , L 0, ,
,.._ _ , . �. D �� }Q D
.
-- -- - . - - --- .- ; -. - _' • -, ' , ; 1 1 �-1 3 S L fv c �.'t 1� �t � _ . .
; : _, _ . . -
. __ . _ _ . ,
• � , ; , �
, , . �. .._ _ _ .. .
.
--- -, - -- . . _ _ .. .... ._. - . ,_ �.. _ - - �
� : � :`
, _ , . _ . . .. .. . , . _.
.... , ._ .. . . . _.
_ ._:..__,_ . . .. ; ..-- - - ;
� --.
: � _: _ _. ' ._., , _ _ _ .
-. - -'-. ,-- � . .
- { ----=------ _.. � s � , s � - = -------- y
.. _
. _ _ -- -
- --� , . ._ � _ - ,
. �. _. ,
,
Q - �iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii�i�,�.
�' � � ,
- I _ _ _: . , :� , _,°` � ._, : � . _ .� .L
� . _ . . . -- _ .
_.
�. �_ � ` ,,a� ����,ti�- \ �, �
_. .. �.. ��
.
. _._. �
;
•' � j '__ `. _ _.. _ ' �J -- -_ �\\n
, � :.�T , �
_ ,� _ .. � ; _ . .. , �? ; �u. _ , ' _ ` L �: ._ �
' `
� , t -� -' -. _ . - ---- . .: � .. r -E , �s v
. � � _ . -�--- `�( , �' ' `j __ 1 I � ,� _ � ,� I `�. \ _ . �,
•� �__ _.: �,p ; — = 1 I"��!`I�S�
—� s � 1
.� . . .� � , � .. f . � . , r ��
.. <..\. � �. �S ... _�. , _; .. .. . . i--- �_._ . ...� - '- � ,- - .....--� .. . . . .
� V
__ �... -�� � � .t,
� _ , . `. . . _ . _ _ .. , .. . ;- - - ,',
��. _ �,\
_ _ . .. . _ , E '� � �t- � , �
_.._ _. . ' . . ' , .. �'._ . �1,� _.� � ! _ :��,1 .r1
.
.
. -... --- - • � _
- • -
.._ � - I _
,
, _ .. _. .T _ _ - - -- i :'� _ _ �;��
�
� � , . . . . 1 . .. � � � � \ 4 .
�
— . - _, , � v �i /O S �� —
� ��_ -' / pJ' ' 7 ` `� _�---�..� `5'?�.� _ _.: �.. ,:. > " ' O�O/////O�O/�// ��/,�� .
.__ ` . _ __ , . I -- -- - - _ -
� ��
( ` � ._. ,- i s � f „ .
i ! �
� �3
I , q _ --. — ' .: _ , �_ _ _
9 � ` _ .
- ` .� - - .. .;. � - .: � � - .--.; ^� i
- ' . _ , \ �_ . . . _: ! - , - ; i_ � - :-_ �.: _ �: � f. ' �o c� ' R o �c� �'i l ! k� X ! !_� _ . . -
,
�� � ,..
. , "
. !� . . .
__ .� _�. _ `
.
. _�- �: o
,
; _
. . .. . . -. T'Roo m 7 . _. .�
• _..._ .. �.._ ._. _ _ _ S � — �
_,___ �
_ .� ---.. , , .
,
, 3 ; „ > . : � � � , ♦� 4 .
; � ��, r � �- r. M I , � - �
_ I X .
� S ao 7
, "' �:r�� t:.�-a
. ', � f , s � . . .�" -2- .� x. T�' �"'� r�J .
( , � r . � a f � .�.� .. . a .� � :� _ ���la'1' . �. . � ,
� �a- �� -.� C��" Q , . ` ,-, � s i , + t r _ -_ -
! '- , �/
r r , ' � � '
: � { ; � ; � i '; ` � �r ��� �..�.� � � r� �•, _
� �- � /
�, .�.•�•.� _ - -zzRZ.c— , -.. -.�-�.-.�.. _—_ }�`�,_ "� �.�/, _ �.�_h? �,.�'�� r � (r C. A-�v - .� - . .
_ �. . __ _ '_._ _ _ .' _'° ' __ .. ., _ _ . . . _ _� � — �-�"` _ .
� . SHEET 2� � j .,�
} � �� ARe A� ��1A Q .
, �; :
, , ,.,., , �. -
; ,. ; � ; , �, P, .,,.:';;
�^ 1 � . � . Q � N . . ' I I � � . d L.
4 . �� p . � � i 1 � ..{. .
4 , , � � , � . J i � i W � � A
i i � �y
� � .� � I .. .. ' . 1 ' �yQ1 � i
�� �_iun_ ; �i � ��" p a� �
�� ' � . 1 �1 �� . � � 1��(�i
I }
I I. .., ' . . � �I . i 1 1 � �IyM ,+y i.:
� ; � �� t T'Wr f � d �
y � . i . i � r' '� �e-- '�q{.i
�
� � �� LUGO PARK � � �" �. �' ��
I ; '� �� '
„ � � ;;:. . .. � , '____i�!•�'____'�__""?�� �__�nv_ ^ e'��'(�_'" � ; � �
�(G7Y OF LYNW�Q71 � y�•s � i -------- avy - , '
o . - , . . , � -'naw . 4� ''�.
I�i i E-/29-�7 . • � . � � �I
, . � i : c � . � ' r _ _ ilY'lo �,., � .
�:; . , : �, . • t � � � � -„' .; .
' __—_ _Ji!�S______ _ JRfI� . � F .
t ' {- --- _ �-- � !,t'.
, � � ' PORTION : nSY J i L `� s , , ,�
- �' I i OFLOT / ' ..,a.. �` \ pis� jf:F�, �l3 b ��
� ------------- - o
� � N�N 2 _1__________!Ot/) .l 41
� }' � YR3-NS ' . neH _ ___ r �____ �
' s : cse-rrao 'K - ia.T --- - � �#.
`; , , ;{ _ , • . � � x� e �� �i
I ? . . IiS�� �19St � �--� _---
,� , :4 � 5� a �S�g. .�
: � --------------- ---i--------v„-. ---L t
; �
� : � � . .a --_� --. rl Y1l 1 � � - � �,.� ±i
u� �� t
i� 1. : � r,v�5 �'— -_- ,` ,ri
� '� ��sso � . S i ~ � � � �,
' ,.
�� 4 , � . , nad � n Jaa �an, wY � iar n � raf " .°,„ _ �fS i w�
� j� . �6s � � i i I i i ' . � i 1 � N� 7A �� t r g
� � ��6i i i � i � i � W9S.f �0, A i 9 �I
n t R:d . �` � ° � g O� �I �+� 1� \T..� I�Y � . 8 �,I��
� � L,l�w �ti I n. + 2' ^ : a� � b`J I ° a-n '1� V t
J IIIIV � AVE Q - �i �'T � � i^ � �. � c�n �� d � W____' u�4').
rYi vs�'a p4 El4e asc Mti 300 . '.r.r. � V `-� � °, � �° " i' x i �`'� � � e -�� '� 2 y = �
i d �; r�o ..; '�:.� i��e� ,us�i�'�?�1 �,sc'[ - r''�
j o r q .b CORTLANO .s.w �pNa �� a i
T �N II � Y ����.. M J651 G�Yw .A J76 � �
6i a i: r �,�� � . . �� �,� Q i AuE ��« 1- Y:��
� I I ��� iA ., m �16., �;' �, ' � c � " o',�°; �Bi . S . 1 .nu i . '� ,, �
� I I M � •O, . . `. � n ` '1 a� b � •+- v a� � � . �6 � d I �J� I
�• . , i y n-i bY, ��' � �. � i - { 1 ' '
I �p ��., ii�.i, a . . Ai1o��fh � � i.u �� � 1 1 - Y . � 1 �;
t r
I 1 u rn' ��.� /iL,. �� � � .
Y � n ,� � ,,..� � � Ub � -- ,�,�r 1. LO��,�5 i . �� i.
� . (� /U9) ( ' � I
nmr �� M - ----� ' �
e � . ��:. � -- ����--- "''�y �� i � •
* Y � < ` F ' � N � /11l1 . _ �� �'t ' I . I
' �7 , �,. , ; "' � u4ib a� i �
. I' I . �, i�... . � . '__7)R ' _ nsriYr A � N' �� � .
r i� P 9�. in' ' - ��aaT_""1 . ' 1 ' 1. .
ll�it , Z � �Ab, 3 _ i.�:. uc:, . . �i . � � , jy � �
_. I � ` a.l, � .�m �� � " rco3T_'_ ___ '__� �• � �
� S
o fl! m i i�.ao : L� 3 ub., �io:y � ��1 . - � a
r. �� Z .. I , � , .. �.�N. � 0 __'7sr7____ - -�1 1 � 91 •:Il�l
,n�r - i � �
� . a n� ; �
r IO �.��, ' m t m v � . _'7su�'__ _ �I�: 1 � �
�' n��� ii� � aY � :.��!
I . 114.. 1
� '� N . . _'_iszG -' - �l --R � � 1 1 1 �� "`
ii , „..a ���.. W �,�$ R � � `��
�
�o ��N . N' ___%TJl -- � ;r,sr ; � � ' �
Il .; � ulwo . i w � � � ` i� �So �i ' � � ,�N ��
'�n
H , R i�c„ i
��� F ; �� � utb � �. //4. iL�I � ' � ' , 1 ,���
� �� µ.. N� �'� iww �n wm • N43� �� w � .
I �Q . .. r J3 , . - ' q.
i ''. p ' � ' J I1
I If 1 .�.' N' V . � ' ��
In i
� �e..,
' '� i 3 • ,.,� Q, b ,. �
I { F- �'' a;�, qal - ��2 � . �
, t� � i ` ((q ; �� i m• O k f�:.� I
, i�ii �.,� � q,.. Ny � � � � ' ' � S - �1
� 3 m��' Y �j, y ��, p � o c�t PORT/ON OF LOT 6 rs,Ya,
�.
��
� ^%ai re � ' y:�,�� er.as pa � . � nl�• . . . . . . �y,;'.}�6�
� 5�� . , �. �a .
� �ll����'� � n n,jj�
� � a;
� � �r�so i:,
I. 1+ C� 7s � ��;
q � ' F.; I '.
� � , °;:
� I �vu�- s a�
+, ' : r . __ __ �
il 0 • � . llll� �
• � , . O � ��.�
��',.'�
�, � , ��'�
�, , ,
'� ; I �',�,
�,i"
� ADMINISTRATIVE R�POHT ;��
, � � i6,
. CITY OF LYN�VOOD 1a�
,. � . , . . , ' i i
February 21, 1978 'I
1
� ',� I
� Number 4 ' Volume 3 ��
� i
'�.
ATTACHMENTS:
, ,, I'�
� 1. Notice of Vacancies
+ -
' 2. CENTURY FRE�WAY - KNXT - TV Editoria].
� 3. Pacific Telephone Argument for 40% Increase
� I �,
�;� 4. ,Budget Calendar �
I ,
' A. VACANCIES '
� As the Council will notice from Attachment No. 1, tive have
conformed with the law and you may wish to consider appointments
' to these positions at the Council hieeting of February 21, 1978.
i . .. '
a B. UN�MPLOYM&NT INSURANC�
I,� � As a result o£ the Pederal law covering all employees for
• unemployment insurance, the State of California has been mandated
' to start a program. All public agencies wi7.1 have had to make a
'� choice of inethod for paying into the State Fund.
�i, i
� The City of Lynwood has selected the contributiom rate method.
o j
; This would provide the City with .a budget'able figure.of $23,594
r ' for the year. This method of: payment may be changed any quarter
8' � of a calendar year in case the City.would elect to.go on a direct
�' ! reimbursement plan. The payment of unemployment monies to the
" State is viewed by the administration as a benefit for the employee
, and �vill be considered as such when negotiations for salary in-
crease begins.
i j .
i
' C. .,SHERITF'S COMhIUNITY MEE'PING
a
` A reminder of the Sheriff.'s Community Meeting is set for
� one o'clock Saturday, February 18, at Bateman Hall. ,
,
,
� ,
i «� ,
. . � � • � � • � � e O �
D. LONG BEACH AUDIT
Iiappy to say that in cooperation with our outside auditors,
the City Attorney, City Clerk's office, Pngineering'-- we are
-nearly completed with an audit goi.ng back to 1972 for the Long
Beach wideriing proje,ct. It appears the City will have money
owed to it from the County.
� E. LA RSEN-HOGUE PROPERTY
Question was made in the last Council b4eeting regarding
that portion of Santa Fe Avenue property (Larsen-Hogue Property).
Records indicate that it was transferred in 1969.
r
F. IT�MS OF INTT'R�ST
�1rt Nelson reports that the County Flood Contro:L has done a
good job in cleaning the catch Uasins. There were several that
needed immediate attention and action was taken right away.
C V Disposal contacted the homeowners and everything seems
to be pretty.�vell under control. The City also has made their.
� own surveys, and will be doing another one in about a week.
, The pot holes at Century and Alameda near the railroad tracks
will be filled.
* * *
The Lynwood Recreation and Parks'Department DIAL-A-RIDE
program began on Monday, February 13, 1978. _
' Lynwood residents over 50 years of age or any handicapped
Lynwood resident are eligible for this service.
�, The program operates Monday through FridaS� from 9:00 a.m.
to 3:00 p.m. For a fee of 25Q, eligible persons will be picked
' up at their home, transported to their destination and returned
home. .
. During the first week oF service the system has been iised
to transport individual.s to doctor aUpointments, grocery shop-
' ping, ho.t meals program and to the drug store.
. . . , , i
There h�s been a cha.nge in the LA Ti.mes sta:ff. The people
�cho �reviousl,y covered Lynwood have been transferred to new o:f-
fices in Long Beach, and as yet have not met their replacemen:ts.
� It seems the Times is going all out to be a west coast newspaper
rather than just a lar�e metropolitan paper as they are opening
offices and down the State and on the coast.
I
� • . , . O
G. LEGISLATION OF INTEREST � .
It appears likely that we will have property tax relief
in the form of SB-1 since it has been endorsed by both parties
and the Governor. However, in reviewing this, it seems to be a
coniused measure and will take several' years to undo some damage
" aud unless certain amendments are achieved, it is going to penalize
cities which have reduced their property tax. Between the time you
read this, however, it may be.law.
GeneraT Municipal Election Date. Consolidation with School
Disi;riot �lection A13 222� - presently most school districts and
community college districts hold their elections.in March of each
odd-numbered.year. General law cities hold theis elections in
March of each even-numbered year. AB 2224 would change this re-
gcilar election date from h4arch to April and, more importantl.y,
would change the school district and community college district
election to April of each eden-numbered year. Therefore, AB 2224
would consolidate general municipal elections with school district
a��d community college district.elections in April o:f: each even-
numbered year. The purpose of the bill is to increase voter turn=
• out and decrease the costs of holding elections:
Tran'sportation Revenues. Truck Weight Fee Bi11 Killed. \
, SB 844 - League-sponsored SB 844 was taken up for a vote on the
floor of the Senate on Friday, January 28. The measure failed to
pass, however, �nd is now dead. As most city officials are aware,
this is the bill which would have increased truck weight f.ees to
require that industry pay its fair share of the maintenance costs
. which are attributable to damage done,to street's and roads by
. heavy vehicles.
Compulsory' and'Binding Arbitration. SB 164 was allowed to
die on the Senate inactive file. Strong and unified opposition
from city' officials throughout California made it possible for
this legislative mandate to be defeated.
Veterans' Points Bill Preferenti2l tx•eatment given military
veterans on State Civil Service exams will be a thing of. the past
if a measure recently passed by the Senate is successful in the
Assembly. SB 847 by Senator John Dunlap squeaked through on 1
bare 21-15 vote after the author promised to amend it to afiect
. only people who entered the military afi:er December.3]., 1975.
Under existing law, veterans receive a 10-point benefit on the
exams, and Dunlap and others see this as "unreasonable" when the
real purpose of the exam is to choose the best employees for the
' State.
� • O
Gambling in California? That rift over just where the Calif.-
Nevada border falls at Lake Tahoe,has spread to i:he Legislature.
The U. S. Supreme Court is expected to rule shortly on whether
part of Nevad� -- including.a couple of popular casinos -- is
actually within California because of some mis-figuri.ng years'ago.
AB 1874 by �ssemblyman Mike Cullen is aimed at ensuring that the
casinos on the north shore of Tahoe can�continue to operate if the
high court rules in i'avor of a suit brought by Attorney-General
Evelle Younger. He and the State Lands Commission claim that
surveys mistaken].y placed the Calif:-Nevada border about 1,700
feet farther �vest than set forth in the Constituti.on of 1849.
Cullen tells Newsletter that a Constitutional Amendment also
would be required to permit'gambling at the casinos.
Pregnancy a Disability. A measure that would make pregnant
' worliers el.igible for the same disability benefits as "other".di.s-
abled employees, has been approved by the Assembly. AB 1960 by
' Assemblyman Howard Berman would also prohibit discrimination
against pregnant employees in hiring amd promotion, un].ess a
woman could not perform the assigned job and no transl'er was
possible. The provisions e;ctend present statutes relating to
school employees to all female employees.
' "Rap Sheets" -- the "rap sheets" of multiple,criminal o�-
fenders would be made available to the public under SB 1379,
introduced by Senator Robert Presley. It would include people
who have filed ior public elective otfice, �vho hold such an
o:ffice, or who haye been nominated or appointed to a non-civil
service public otfice. The measure wou].d.exempt from disclosure
the records of persons with only one crimin�l conviction. Juven-
ile court records would remain closed. The bill is to be heard
in Senate Judiciary, March 7.
Budgets From the i.nformation now emergi.ng reglyding the
, President's budget included these items of importance to our
community. There is a 193'o increase in aid to urban areas.
. ....An increase o£ $1 billion i.n the HUD budget, most of
• which wi7.7. go for rent subsidies and subsidized
' housing construction;
...An increase in HUD spending for Community Development
Grants from $2.6 billion in fiscal 1978 to $2'.8
in 1979;
....Continuation of. the recently-enacted $400 million Urban
Development Action Grant program (UDAG) at the same level;
' ....Continuation ot,the public service (CETA) jobs program
tor another year at the same level.of 725,000 jobs;
,,;A supplemental. appropriation of $117 million for re-
gular EDA programs in 1978 with aUout $27 million oS
that earmarked for cities. The 1979 PDA re.que,sti is
$627.4 mil].ion of which about 33 percent ($205 million)
would go to cities.and another $40.9 million for counties.
; • o
One interesting change,in this year's EDA budget is alloca-
tions by geographic unit (city', county, state) instead of by
functional titles (public works', planning, technical assistance).
'' The change is designed to.give a",packaging" perspective to fund-
� ing programs. As a result, cities could get broader-ba.sed assist-
r ance covering a wide range of economic development strategies in-
� stead of seeking funds for specific functions.
4
t i . . * . * � * , �
Q . . � . . � � � .
President Carter's tax reform package includes another pro-
posal for a taxable bond option (TBO) for state and local govern-
� ments as an al.ternative to the tax-exempt bonds the,y currently
. sell. The TBO has been finding its way in and out of Congress
, for the past seven years. Carter has proposed giving state and
` local governments the option to issue taxable bonds, accompanied
by federal 'interest subsidies. For bonds issued in 1979 and'1980,
the subsidy would be equal to 35 percent of the interest cost.
The subsidy would increase to 40 percent for bonds issued after
, 1980. In his tax message, Carter emphasized that the iederal
government would 'nave no control over how local and state govern-
� ments use the subsidized financing.
6 , *. * *
�
�� ; From the �NALL STREET JOURNAL
New jobs spawned by public works cost $14,118 each, data .
�show.
i The $6 billion Uncle Sam is giving local governments to
I' build such tfiings as sewers and tennis courts will, over three
�� . years, create.the equivalent of 425,000 jobs lasting one year,each,
according to new U. S. estimates. Hard hats will get 110,000 and
� suppl�:ers 66,000. These workers' spending on food, cars and the
like will spawn the other_249,OOO.jobs.
i
' The program, the biggest of its kind since the 1930s, is ex-
i pected to end December 31, 1980, but most of the impact will be
� felt in the next year or two. As of last December 31,,with 9,].00
G of the,10,600 projects underway, almosi $1 billion had been pumped
'� into the economy. Minority firms could do as much as 14% oF the
I work.
The Commerce Department, which runs the effort, wants "standby"
authority for similar programs in future econom'ic downturns.
* * *
. - .. . . � i O ' ..
� �'j� lti y
n,^ ,
F�., • ; , ..
d.l �
C' �y� . � �``.•�� . '. .
� Qr;.""i; �
Subject: Century Freeway: Stop Stalling, Start Building ".;,,;'`..;.
V
Broadcast: February 7 and 8, 1978 �
For 15 years the government has been planning the Century Freeway,
which is designed to run across southwest Los Angeles from Norwalk
to L.A. International Airport.
I The freeway has obvious attributes. It passes near Compton, Watts
and Willowbrook, where unemployment runs as high.as 40 percent; and
connects those areas with industry to the west. �
While the project could cost $670 million, the federal government
will pay 91 percent of the cost..
The project will also provide 5,000 construction jobs for five years.
, After the predictable amount of red tape, the final environmental
impact statements were dispatched to Washington.
And Governor Brown extended his approval and support.
That led the Los Angeles Transportation Canmission to hope that
freeway construction would begin next year.
��` But the red tape never stops.
The State Air Resources Board...after five years of study...now
- opposes the.freeway. It has decided that transferring 140,000 cars , :�;�
a day fran city streets to a freeway will cause an air pollution
problem.
The Air Resources Board is too late arriving on the scene, and in
the context of the other studies and considerations, its case is not
convincing.
It's time to.stop pushing paper and start pouring concrete.
� • , 't � r . • .. . ' .
<. O
Pacific Telephone
1978 Rate Case
FACT SHEET
What Pacific Telephone Seeks:_ Increases in certain rates
and charges totaling some $471.4 million a year. �
cmy ? . Inflation is the reason--increases'in the
�
cost of doing business and in the cost of raising capital. .
' Addi�ionally: .
�
--Pacific's financial condition is critical. Its
; ability to compete for investor dollars is in
I
,� jeopardy. '
--Pacific's common stock is currently selling at.
about $17 per share--about $5 below its bbok value.
Result: Pacific cannot sell new shares without
severely deflating its present stockholders`
• investment. �
--Pacific's bonds have been downgraded three tiunes in
the last five years.
--The company has not been able Co earn its authorized
° a r_ate of return of 8.85 percent on investment. O:�ly
recently has it come evea close to that fi�ure. By
- contrast,' the company's most receat debt issue of
$300 million will,cost the-utility an annual interest
of 9 percer.t.
� .. '
. . � � o .
--Pacific is faced with potential refunds.of about. �
$206 million and a rate reduction of some $60 �
�- - million as a result of a 1977 California Public - `
Utilities,Co�nis'sion decision now being appealed.
--The company coul'd owe in excess of one billion
dollars in back itaxes should it lose its eligibility
for certain tax benefits. This matter is-no�a under ..
review.
--The company needs improved e2rnings to maintain
and improve service: Rate relief granted in the
. past has been put to good use, but is sicuply a case
of "too little-too late."
" --If the company can accelerate its Ievels of moderniza-
tion, the impact on requirements for future rate
increases can be substantially reduced.
-. � --Better earnings are needed to modernize equipment ----- -
and services so that the company.can provide
improved and more economical service to it� customers.
--The company tiad budgeted a record $1.5 billion for ,,,
essential new construction in 19.78 to keep up with
California's growing service demands.
--The company must regain its financial integrity so
�. that its investors can receive an i.mproved return
- on their common investments.
�. _.. 47tien ? A notice of inGention to seek- a.$4.71..4_.million rate.._: �..
- increase was tendered to the commission January 7.9, 1978; to be
.. � ' 0 3 .
followed, upon.commission acceptance, by a formal application
in 60 days. The commission, under an experi.mental plan �
adopted last year, has one year after the date of formal filing
to reach�a decision.
What Rates Wou1d Be Involved?
. BASIC RATES -- Monthly charges for a residential .
customer with flat-rate service would increase from $5.70 to _
$7. Charges for residential customers with measured service
(maximum of 60 local.calls).would rise from $3.75 to $4.15.
There would be no change in the basic "lifeline" rate of $2.50
for a maximum of 30 calls.
The first 10 additional calls would be billed at the
rate of 10 cents each, and for ca11s over 40.the rate would .
be 15 cents a call. Currently, calls over 30 cost 5 cents each.
For business customers,.existing basic rates of $7
a month would increase to $8.70.
The higher basic residence charges would still not
cover even half the company's cost of providing the seryice,
according to the company. The basic residence rate, moreover,
would remain among the lowest in the nation..
. SERVICE CON,VECTIONS -- Charoes for connection of a
new phone for residential customers would rise to $19-$44 from
$17-$28. However, if a customer obtains a telephone from a
Pacific Telephone PhoneCenter Store and connects it to an .
existing jack,. the one-time installation charge.would be $19. ,�_
• << .
. � �
(Service connection charoes are divided in several parts,
including service order activities, central office work; and
premises work)_. The customer pays,for only the work related,
to his or her particular connection.
. BILLING -- Customers would be able to pay service
connection charges and the initial charge for premium serdices.
(e.g. Design Line telephones); on an installment basis:
�
Upon a_custoner's request, the company would include
more than one name on a telephone bill, provided both parties
have the same surname. This will assist customers in the
establishment of credit and will ease legal complexities over
billing in cases such as divorce.
. TIESSAGE U�IITS -- The company Froposes to eliminate
. multi-message units, iahich esist only.in metropolitan areas
in the state, and bi11 such calls according to.present intra-
state to1T (long distance) rate schedules. Under this plan �� -
one and two minute ca1Ts would cost less than they do today.
, NEW PHONES -- Residential and single line business
customers.i�i11 be able to request new phone installations on
week days at off-hour periods, from 6 a.m. to 8 a.m, and from
, 5 p.m. to 10 p.m, at a.cost of $10 above the regular service
• , connection charge, This service.is not available now.
. .. BUSY SIGNAL, INTERRUPTIONS -- FlElen a customer asks �• ---- -
an operator to verify that the phone of a called party is busy,
�- �-- or-asks the operator to interrupt.a conversation (which occur.s. �:�
__.more than 54,000 times in".an average business.day in California), �
`a 50-cent surcharge would be imposed.
�
' ' S.
. . . � _ �. . O i
�
�. �
. �
. �
. OPERATOR HELP -- Present rates for intrastate ,
calls requiring operator help vary according to time and '�
distance. Under the new schedule, calls requiring assistance
i
of an operator, such as those placed on a collect basis, a I
� �
f1at.50-cent surcharge would be imposed on station-to-station �
�
calls and a flat $1.50 on person-to-pers'on calls regardless I
�
of time and distance. " . �
. TOLL -- Rates for short-distance toll calls would �. �
be reduced during off-peak hours; that is, hours other than , I �
i
i
8 a.m, to 5 p.m. Rates for toll calls placed on holidays �
i
would be billed at the lowest rates--that is, those which �
�
,
prevail on,Saturday.s. Currently, holiday calls are based on
Sunday rates. �'
. HANDICAPPED -- For deaf customers who must com�uni-
cate over telephone lines with the aid of teletypewriters, no
timing of local calls would take place for those with measured
• rate service. �
Pacific also proposes to make arrangements for blind
people who wish to cotr,municate with up to 10 other blind persons
I' at one time on a"conference call." The calls.would be.arranged .
between midnight and 6 a.m, at no charge.
,. OTHER -- Also proposed.are increases in monthly
'�.` charges for extended area service; premium phones_, such as
Princess, Trimline and Touch-Tone sets; key.telephone service,
and rivate line services• and ex ansion of o tionaT caliin °'--'—�"---'
p , P P g.�:: ;.... .
"• measured service for residential customers on a.statewide.basis.. :c:-s'-:
1
I
I^_
' • U.
. . . , � . . � � , • ' � ..
Increases in Pacific's Cost of Doin� Business:
,
� 12 Months Change Change
Endin� 11/30/77 Since 1967 Since 1974-�
Payroll $ 1.59 billion up 154% up 30%
Construction $ 1.40 billion up 2247o up 36%
Operating Taxes $592. million up 95% up 28%
Interest Charges $265. million up 348% up 30% '.
Plant Investment^'�' $ 11, billion up 134% up 28%
Employees^* 92,157 up 7.6% �° � 3.1% .
-,�
I �
Increas�e in Consumer Prices
(Av2r2ge of San Francisco-Oakland and Los Angeles-Long Beach)
� Food up 91% up 28�a
Housing up 97% up 34%
, Medical up 109% up 43% -.-- -
Change in Pacific TeTephone P.ates:��
Customer Charges-Zntrastate:��* up 27.7% up 4.4� .
� *Last time basic monthly rates were changed
**As of 11/30/77
^^'�Includes local; directory advertising and intrastate changes. '
, if�f7! � . �
1
. . : . . . .. . . . 4'y
+ � � . . . , . _.
I . .
.� � . . , � � _ . ' . .. , . � � !
. •
. s�rirt ii� tdrCD $�71 rizz.r,ioY � �'�
�5timiitdcl 1979 ratQ'of rnturn 7,25�L �
� � �ntir�:ated 19't9 �eaCa bnno: $G.0 billion '
,
; ,
�Rnto .incrnnna (k;el.`or-tt iftC6�i� �3icae7 fl�eesnnry ta incz�QAna "
rato aC raturn i�y lyo , $148 miilion
aatca incren��s neeen�Ar.�y tb Bl�dt� �ShE �nernn�aea-�uo� �o
gat up to `tlie pz�aaan� $.E7�13yo uuthb�izod roCurn . 23G miliib�i
j . � Rntn incrc�nnn- nee�onr�ry �o i.ncrenAa �a�o o�' �raturn to rn-
y quireQ io.7/o re�urn 276 m�llian
Totmi noguircmenL • , 51 r��iiion
� Lc�A CEItTRE?C nnd d�.rfletozy udverti�ing increa�as,. '
� ulxaady roc�laat�d (AnQ m�uc �r-r-o�tu) �i �,iiiian �
� .
Amount ot thin app].1.cat�on , �
� mf�lion
. �
. �._._._ ,..._. � .
� r1AJOR �Eh1�N'rS OF PROPOSED Rr1TE�CRi;ASES , �
• Easic Er.chanQe Service �
. Residential
. Increased 22�. � .
' . Flat rate service increased from $5.70.to $7.00.
. Measured service increased from $3_75 to $4.15: .
. Lifeline Service remains at $2.50. `
. Business • '
' . Increase 240.
' . Measured business increased from $7.00 to $3:70.
�' . PBX trunks increased from'$3.50 to $5.95._
. Single i•lessage tinit Cnarces "'
.. No increases in measured residence or business. `
. Increase Lifeline fron 5� to lOG for first 10 caZls '
` over allowed limit;. 15� for"al1 calls thereafter.
Intrastate Toll and i•Iulti-biessaqe.Unit GharGes �
. . Convert rer,:aining 3 and 4 message unit routes to ,
, intrastate toll sch2dule. � •
. Standard o�eratoi-assisted cnar.ges for station-to-. .
station and persor.-±o-p�rsoa ca11s regardless.o=
tir,:e of dav or distance. •
Service Connection • �
, Increase 420. :- � _
. Range of charges ' -
- ' . . Present Yropos�d "
; Residence . $17-$28 . $19-$a4 '
, � . .�Business ' $27-$41 $
i . Installment billing nlan included. �� ;
, ..,Encourages use of Phone Center.
� • �
Key Telephone Service �.� ,
� . 53g increase.. . .
, -. Tncreases in 6 button sets, 10 and 20 buttbn sets.'•'
I � Call Directors, and line.features. .
i ' Verification/Interrupt Service Charge
, �
'; .�C�charge £or verifyiag busy line or emergency
l • interruption.
� � Other Affected Products and Services
. y . � .
� � ' . PrS.vate Line
�� . Extensions and Premium Sets ' ,
� . . . 2dileage '
. Extended Area Service - �
, �� .. . '
�� ' • .
� _
i � � � � .
.
,
:y.,...��c�..i � ,. � -° -- .v
,
:_ . . , , - _--
����. �
� - - ----_
� �. . . � ' . - . . . . ' _ . . . . :r�...a:r..::,: •
. . _ � .. . . . .. - .. . '� .
� � .. � . . . , ,. � . � . . ; . . . � . .. � . . ����:. . . .
. • . � - ' . , � . . � � � .
4TI�Pl PACIFIC N�EDS HIGH�R �ARNZNGS TO F
' . - . . TN�IC� ITS CO � Q $��U�IOI� ]� .
. . . _._... ,
. _ . ... .... - .
, _,.. .. _ _ - _• -- - .,._...�._...,_ ROGItIIbt
� Deb�� `�°°a"
AV@�'�!g@ co�t of pre��n� ��U� , '
Cos� . �,,�
Qf ne� dg??�nt��es
`',,: Result� ' a� . 9 %� �
—•--- g- _h $1Q4 01` naw d�bt co�ta , '
�t� ��?�e�ast . Sa a � aar moro �
Common Stoch= .
Prea�n� invvv�mcnt bohind each sh�ru of common a�oclt
bier)cat vtslus� 0� each. s}�aro SZ2 !
. . . ' . ' . . . - I f ... .
_ Result: it n��,r 3harQe wQre to be aold at maz}�at �� .'
� t}io dilu�io�z factor on tlie i n v c� a t t�� t a f p �r4�
. son i r�tvckJloldpru ia S5 por s�har�... `
: =n other tvordn,the mora stock wa aeli uri�3�r
Pr�sent condition� the woraa off prasant utock.-
holci�ra ara.
T1I� OOLUTIONt FIIGIiCR EAI2NING$ �
� ' ...... .... ..... .. ._. ..._ ._-
, ' • . .` .
,',�-... � 'i���-� .. • . .. _ - .. -.,'. ... .. ' � : , ' ; _� �. . . .� . .. , - �' . . .
-"� � - . � � � �
' F , „ '
. The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company - State of Califorriia •_,
MAJOR I'ORh11�L RI�T� PROCE�DINGS �
,. Ycars 1996-1975
. � � Rate of
Appl.or Date Return �lmount Decision Year of Amount Perce^
Case No. Filed Description 1luthorizecl , Req uest-ed P7umber Decision Grinted Grantc
A-28211 1947 Ra�e increase sough�
Original application -- $20,195,000 �10�;37 1947 $10,500,000 •
ATen3*�ents -- 19,195,000 dOG�5 1947 5,500,000
Adjmt. of org. appl. -- GG5,U00 4_1021 19h7 6,455,000
5.6o nU,U55,0UC3 41�116. 19h6 5,100,000
�27,555,U00 . G9�
n-29g54 1,948. Rate increase sougkit -- $3II,500,000 92530 1999 $13,000,000 .
5.6"0 431�15 19�9 13,d00,U00 .
�,4UO,UUU 6g2
A-31300 1950 .Rate increase sought �
- Origir.al application " $30,000,000 44923. 1950 None
Amendment -- 6,000,000 45316 195t �None
_- 36,ODU,UUO 460G5. 1951 None. 0`a
A-32640 1951 Rate increase sought 5.6; "�. $1�r�� h6270 1951 $1�', 100°
(to cover highcr wages e
and taxes)
A-33935 1952 Rate increase sou9ht. .
Original application 6.25c $4�.,026.,000 50258 195h $11,100,000
Ar.iendments " 9,5'�0,.000 50402 1954 7,071,000
$53,5GG,000 � $18,171,UUU 34�
,. . �
. . . . . .
i .
. • y � e . � . . . . . . . .
� Rate of ,
Appl.or Date � Return F�r�ount Decision Year of Amount Percer.�
Case No. I'iled Description . nu�horized R�nuested Numi�er Decision Granted Grar,te3
A-39309 1957 Rate increase sought
Original application -.- $28,500,000 5593G 1957 $17.,OG6,000
�endments 6.750 12,299,000 5GG52 195a 15,456,CC0
$40,"7J9,000 $2%,522,UOU 67>
C-7409 1962 Commission investigation G.30� - 67369 '19G4 $(fl-0,722,000) -
A-48643 1966 Rate increase sou�ht -- . $G,100,000 71350 196G $6,100,000 TOC�;
A-;9142 T967 Rate increase sought 6•9° $181;35G,000 7h917 19G8 $50,200,000 2�
7�}917 £31,900,000* 45":
A-51774 1970 Rate increasc sought �•II�� $19h,fl97,000 803�.7 1972 $55,�100,000 2II�
A-52794 1971 Rate increase souqnt . -- � $77,n00,000 790^73 1972 $70,000,000
(for higher wages) 79941 1972 ( 1,100,0 00) '
$68,9UO,UUU II90
A-535G7 1972 RaLe increa�e sou,hi: ' �
Original application a� $328,000,000 II31G2 197n $183,300,000 63�
. Revision to revenue reqmt (26,700,000) .
Revision to reveiiue reqmt " CT1,500,'0
�za�,auo,ouo
A-55214 1974 Rate increzse sought $II3,800,000 ' '
(for hiRher.wages)
nmendcd -,- $97,900,000 85237 1975 $G5,200,000 GG�
A-5549?. 1975 Rate increase sought, $119,G00,000 8II?32 12/77 $1,2:8 !�4i11ion 10.��-?
��
*Ir.cluding moncy irom separ.ations change � .
� O Cer.oces neqati.ve amoun�, �
;^_.. __ . �. . _ . � . i:. ' � . . ...
�� n �
�� ffBRUARY 191�
� �,,,_ �
T. G. EVENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. _
Municipal Finance Consultants First National Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 612/338-3535 .
�
Temporary Financing:
A Short-Term Program
Any public entity may, on occasion, face financial needs to which temporary financing offers
ihe most appropriate solution. By way of definition, temporary financing is composed of two
basic types: "Cash Flow" and "Construction Financing". Cash Flow financing is designed to
� pay operations and maintenance where costs are incurred more rapidly than designated funds
are received. Construction Financing allows capital expenditures pending receipts of
grants/aids, future assessments, or revenues, whereby the exact amount of permanent
financing_will not be known until close to the construction completion date.
f � ���>
Issuers which may require temporary financing include School Districts, Cities, Special
Districts, and Counties to fund operational requirements prior to receipt of taxes and aids, or
to fund municipal utility improvement projects where grants/aids, and definitive financing
will not be apportioned until the system is nearly operational. This financing .vehicle can be
considered in planning for housing, transportation, redevelopment and urban renewal as well.
i Each state has special authorization requirements and restrictions concerning temporary
i
� financing. Basic to sound financial principles is the fundamental premise that the entity
possess sufficient sources of revenue to repay the debt obligations at maturity, including
revenue derived from permanent financing when required.
Although temporary financing serves an appropriate function, it cannot be used as a
substitute for proper financial planning. T.G. Evensen & Associates, Inc., a firm long
estabtished in comprehensive, fiscal planning, can be of valuable assistance to your
community in solving your temporary financing needs. Financial planning at project inception
may substantially reduce cash flow deficiency. Whether your temporar.y financing is
� accomplished through negotiated or public bidding, you can rest assured that the resuit of an
F
i Evensen handled plan is thorough and to the community's own best interest. Feel free to
contact us to discuss this, and other financial options, specific to your community needs.
�. ,�
A Successful Advance �:Refunding �. �. . ,�
T.G. •EVENSEN bc ASSOCIATES, INC. assisted the City• of , Richfield, Minnesota, in
, accomplishing a substantial savings on an Advance Refunding program as is reported in the
following local newspaper article. If � your community would like more information on
refinancing outstanding indebtedness, call us at 612-338-3535.
Officials say k�ond refinancin+g
will save taxpayers $834,900
. Tme to ro� yrediclions of citv off�- the new issue some o[ which werc investment rating R1caGeld appears Moran also pointed tn the (nc� thal
� � rials, Richfield was able to sell ye.5 sold at six and even as high as seveo �o be altracting more al4ention from mterosl on lhe city Issui was 69
� million in bonds this month to cefi- per cent, aemrding lo ciry Finance bond purehasers — and lower in- polnls below �he base buyer 1Nerest
� nance its IB745 street improvement Director Thomas Moraa leresl rales. indes for the week of 5.64 per cent.
projecte at lower interest rales thal He no�ed lhat Ibe [our investor "SUCh a substan�ial shlft in Ihe per
will meana savingso[nearlyS835.000 �n addition to savings gained from g�oups that bid on the Riehfield cent of bonds placed from Ihe weck
� re[ioancing lh¢ stre¢[ projecls at a
over the next ten years. more tavorable in4erest rate, city of- bonds incloded most of tBe major be[ore we went to market to the Ilmc
ficials also reduced lhe projecl debts �New York-based finaneial firms. o[ our bond salu says. ro me_ thal im
7Te city general obligation bonds by re[iring aboot SI.6 million of the Moran also pointed to the Fect that vesloi's are really intaresled in us:'
offered during Ihe first week ot Project bonds with monies from as- Bipercemofthebundsputoulfurbid Moransxid.
of Investmenl firms�headed�by�the sessment prepayments made by �estment market�we c�pla�cetl�� �or raogemenl and �the�reducuuo of tho
Northwesl Bancorporation of Min- Richfieltlpropertyowners. bought—comparedtoSlpercent[he 19i4-5 bond debt principal will also
¢ � � neapoli6 at an interea[ rate o[ 5.05 per The net ef(ec� o[ [he partial bond week before � put the cily in a goad position to exer-
cent. re[irement and lhe refinancing. The increase i� bond placement, he cise �ts option and rtt�re some or all
' Moran said, will be equal lo a one saiA, was likely due to the attraclive- of the new bonds in ten years rather �
While lhe fnleres[ rate was slighlly; ���� �ax levy decrease [or Richfield ness ot Richfield bonds to investors. than allowing Ihem to ma Wre over 20
Aigher than thal received on a$92 �axpayers over a ten year period be- The city's offering accounted for years.
miltion city hond sale in July, 19TT, it g�nning in 1979. more tha� half [he municipal bonds Thal, he sald, could mean more
is cronsiderably�below lhe rale o( [he Moran said lhal with its new "AA" up for sale dwing the week. savings in the fuwre.
19745 bonds that will be� retired by
" Reprinied trom Richfield Sun
Gasoline Tax - State & Federal Aid Highway Financing
Each year the Engineering Departments of Cities and Counties plan the construction of road
projects based on annual revenues and carry over fund balances. This permits the effective
funding of smaller projects, but often, larger programs must be done on a phase basis.
In some states it is possible to fund larger projects through the issuance of bonds thereby
permitting highway construction to be more efficient and expedient. The bonds, when issued,
are payable from present and future revenues of State and Federal aids, gasoline taxes and
other revenue which would normally be directed to the highway construction fund.
f The proceeds of the bonds are used to establish, construct, and improve highways and bridges.
i In a number of states the issuer may pledge the full faith and credit to secure the payment of
� the bonds and authorize issuance of the bonds by resolution. If you are presently planning �
! your road construction and would like to investigate this method of financing, please feel free
� to contact us.
� U
(Tl��icipai� � fTl�r��t- �o�ditians
INTERFST RATES AND BOND YIELDS .
$horbfer interesf rates remain¢d Fairly level in early December.
ee�cu+r re� u+r+uM
vcncwr re� nwmue ,
w
e
6
i I
�
t
� 7969 � 1970 l 1971 I 1972 I 1973 � �ri� � ma � v.. � .. _.
[OIMSl p NIXIfWK MIIMi
fOVCL SFf tl.µ! �EIOW
Holding its own in 1977 against a record volume of $44,914,798,916, the municipal,market
still promises attractive rates for issuers of municipal bonds. Although the softening of the
market in January has caused the Bond Buyer's 20-Bond Index to drift to 5.74% at mid-month,
indicating slightly higher borrowing costs, the graph above demonstrates that reinvestment
potential is also rising. The graphs included on this page were published at the courtesy of
the U.S. Dept. of Commerce.
AL OUTPUT, INCOME, AND SPENDING
NATIONAL PROMICT
.¢ed aemm+: I.,� rF: �Fud cuonm, no+:.onenel mod.n re�e Sbo bill'wn w 10.4 neum
�ol �m... �ml oae�� (GNN adw.raJ lo� m�=. =M1a.s=+) ��=�ea..d ar a� o.meLeie d 5 � nnamr a.d
CREDIT, AND SECURITY MARKETS
......esi.m�ev�lowedin No'.em6n o�M�de�lin�d.
�
w �� . i � no � vd �. �va �I �i'T'�n�`r.�nr
i I
�
. � __
, ,
,
� �
t R�m��f �a�d 5al�s
� �
Amount Moody's
Sale Date Issuer (000's) Purpose Run BBI Rating NIC
' Jan. 23 Adams Co. Sch. Dist. , Colo. 5,100 Building 79%94 5. 74 A-1 4. 956
23 Brookville LSD, Ohio 1, 450' Improvement 79/98 " A 5. 334
23 Evanston, Florida 4,500� Corporate Purpose 81/88 �' Aaa 4.618 '
19 State of Hawaii . � 75, 000 �. General Purpose 81/98 5. 75 Aa 5. 213
19 Fairha�en, Mass. ..� 1,130 " Sewer 79/88 " A . 4.774
18 Deer Park, Texas 2,000 �'General Obligation 79/9S ^ A-1 4.929
18 Johnson City, Iowa 1; 900 Public $afety Bldg. 79/8S " Aa 4. 449
1.7 Minnesota Housing � _ � . , � � � -� .
FinanceAgency 38,260� :.Hm�.Impr.Revs. ��- 79/94 ." A-1' 5.225 �
- 17 Kenia Pen. Bor. , Alaska 25 970 �'; Schonl Building � 79/93 " A 5. 522 �� �
17 Hayward, Calif. 4, 300 °',: 'Sewer'Se'r, Q Revs. 79/98 " A 5. 522
17 Somerset Co. , N. J. .:..".3, 793 � Various,PRirpose `�..„ 79/94 " Aa 4. 980
17 Statesville, N. C. 950 Sanitary'Sewer 79/96 " A 4. 986
17 Kingsport, Tenn. 7,000 Wtr & Stivr Sys Revs 79/98 " A-1 5.101
16 Minnetonka, Mn. 10,970 Refunding 79/94 " A 4.994
16 Lorain, Ohio 4,120 � Various'Purpose 79/98 " A-1 5.235
16 Burasville, Mn. 2, 760 Improvement 80/99 " A 5. 201
. 16 Bellwood Sch. Dist. , Ill. 1, 115 Fire Prev. & Safety . SO/82 �� A 5. 098
16 BrazosportISD, Texas 12,250 Schoolhouse 79J98 " Aa 4.989
� 12 West Union $ch, Dist. , Ore. 1, 965 School Bonds 79/98 5. 64 5. 390
� 12 '} Grant Co. PUD No.2,Wash. 5,200 Electric Revs. 81/O1 " Aa 5.148
ll AnokaISD #11, Mn. 7,875 Refunding 79/97 " A-1 .5.127 ^
11 Oakland Co., Mich. 1,175 Drain Dist.Drain Bds. 79/98 " A-1 5.553 �
11 Alleghany Co. , Md. 4, 500 Public Improvement 79/98 " A 5. 255
10 Johnson Co. Sch. Dist. , Wy. 3, 250 Building Bonds 79/95 " A-1 5. 027 �
10 Virginia, Mn. 420 State Aid Street Bds. 81/90 " A 4.9.14
x 10 St. Paul, Mn. 6, 500 Capital Improvement 79/88 " Aa 4. 784
� 10 State Wisconsin 118,000 Various Purpose 79/03 " Aaa 4.939
10 Walnut Valley LTSD, Calif. 945 �School Election 79/98 " 5.508�
7�. 10 Mpls-St. Paul Metropolitan �
Council; Mn. 1, 100 Ta�c Anticipation Cert. 1-19-79 " MIG-1 3. 800
9 Lancaster ISD #356, Mn. 396 School Building 81/98 ° Baa-1 5. 671
9 Rhinelander, Wisc. 1,000 Corporate Purpose 70/88 " A'1 4.725
9 Mahtomedi ISD #532, Mn. 2, 640 Refunding 79/91 " A 4. 986
� 5 Pennington Co., Mn. 1,690 Refunding 80/95 5.66 Baa-1 5.158
5 Cranston, R.I. 6, 510 General Obligation 80/99 " A-1 5. 347
5 Roane Co. Sch. Dist. , W. V. 3, 710 Public School 78/97 a ,;' Baa 5. 318
, 4 Richfield, Mn. 6, 450 Refundiag 79%97 " Aa 5. 058
4 Philadelphia, Pa. 78,635 Various Purpose 79/03 " Baa 7.380
t 3 Paradise Valley PSD, Ar. 1, 600 School Improvement S5/89 �� A-1 4. 891
, 3 Hinds Co., Miss. 3,200 General Obligation 78/97 " A-1 5.110
'.'D'ec. 28 Bloomingto� ISD #271, Mn. 7, 185 Refunding 79/90 5. 62 A-1 4. 771
� �28 Hancock Co. , Ohio 4, 000 Hospital Improvement 79/03 " 5. 212
28 Lewisvilie ISD, Texas 2, 000 Building 78/95 " A 4. 886
j 22 . North Little Rock, Ark, 3, 576 Swr & Elec Revs. 78/96 �� 5. 986
20 Mandan, N. D. 2, 300 Wtr & Swr Ut. Revs. 80/97 " Baa-1 5. 471
� 20 Jackson Co. , Iowa 1, 100 Hospital Revs. SO/98 " Baa-1 5. 654 �
; 20 St. Paul ISD #625, Mn. 21, 750 Taac Anticipation Cert. 78/79 " MIG-1 3. 832
19 Maple Grove, Mn. 560 Improvement 80/99 �� Baa-1 5.359
19 Duluth, Mn. 2, 300 Tarc Anticipation Cert. 78 " NR 4. 300 �
,°
s
: