HomeMy Public PortalAbout09) 10A Pavement Management Program Update.City Council
April 2, 2019
Page 2 of4
Pavement condition is measured using a metric called Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
that ranges from 0 to 100. A newly constructed street has a PCI of 100, while a failed
street has a PCI lower than 25. Pavement conditions are described based on the PCI
ranges in Table 1. Sample photographs of various pavement conditions are shown on
page 10 of the PMP report.
T bl 1 P a e avemen t C d'f I d on 1 1on n ex an d c d"t' c t on I IOn a egones
Pavement Condition Index Range Pavement Condition Category
70-100 Good
50-69 Fair
25-49 Poor
0-24 Very Poor
Each street segment is assigned its own PCI value. These individual values are then
weighted depending on whether the street is an arterial, collector, or residential street and
averaged together to determine the citywide weighted average PC I.
The updated PMP report concludes that Temple City's average citywide PCI is 58, while
Temple City's arterial streets have an average PCI of 77. To maintain the current PCI of
58, an annual budget of $2.5 million is required over the next 10 years.
The City's projected annual street maintenance budget of $1.4 million (using a
combination of Measure R, Measure M, and Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation
Account (SB 1) funds) is inadequate to maintain the current PC I. At this level of
investment, the citywide PCI will decrease to 49 over the next 10 years. If no additional
street resurfacing were performed, the citywide PCI would decline to 35 over the next 10
years.
The citywide PCI of 58 is lower than the statewide average of 65. It is also lower than the
citywide PCI of 62 identified in the 2013 PMP report. However, it is important to note that
the 2013 PMP was based on a windshield survey, while NCE conducted more thorough
field investigations and pav~ment analysis for this PMP update. The updated PMP is
therefore more accurate than the 2013 PMP.
Temple City maintains about 72.4 centerline miles of streets with a total replacement
value of $104.7 million. This represents the cost to fully reconstruct every street in the
City, not including curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage, and other non-pavement
infrastructure. Temple City's streets currently have $29.1 million in deferred maintenance.
This represents the cost to resurface all streets as needed to achieve an average good
pavement condition citywide (PCI of 83).
The funding scenarios analyzed in the PMP report do not assume a total replacement of
every street at a cost of $104.7 million, or an immediate improvement to a PCI of 83 at a
cost of $29.1 million. Rather, the scenarios look at what citywide PCI could be achieved
over a 1 0-year or 20-year period, given a certain level of funding.
City Council
April2, 2019
Page 3 of 4
The scenarios initially included in the PMP report looked only at an ongoing annual budget
over a 1 0-year period, with no additional up-front funds. Based on feedback from the
Facilities, Public Works, and Infrastructure Standing Committee, additional scenarios
were analyzed assuming additional up-front funding for the first year. This up-front funding
would be provided by issuing bonds, which would be financed through a property tax or
similar assessment. The advantage of up-front funding is that additional resurfacing work
would be performed in the first year, causing the citywide PCI to increase immediately
rather than gradually over a 10-or 20-year period.
Table 2 shows some of the funding scenarios included in the PMP report, both with and
without up-front funding. Additional scenarios are detailed in the report. The two scenarios
shown below with up-front funding (8B and 9B) appear to strike the most efficient balance
between increasing the PCI immediately and maintaining it over the long term.
Table 2 Sample Funding Scenanos and Resulting PCI
'-t:: Cll 0 .cc. E C11 :::lfl:: zc..
.2::!!: :;;c..
r: E
Cll 0 0 ... (/) ....
0 I!!
ll. Ill
Cll Cll
'C>-
'§ 0
~= (3111
Ol r: :o-r: t/)
:I 5
U...:: .... =
Ill:!: Cll~ >--r;; ......
-U)
Ill r:
:I 0
r: ·-r:=
<( ·-o! ..--
NOl
t/) ·= '-'C Ill r:
Cll :I >-u...
~
t/) r: ... 0
Ill ·-Cil= >-·-·::!!: 0~ ...--
-Ol J!! r:
0 ·-t--'g
:I u...
..... r:
Cll
E
E
0
0
1 49 $1.4 $1.4 $14.0 maintains current funding level using Measure
2 58 $2.5
3 65 $3.4
4 75 $4.6
5 80 $5.2
88 69 $12.6
98 74 $13.6
R, Measure M, and Road Maintenance and
Rehabilitation Account (SB 1) funds
$2.5 $25.0 maintains current citywide PCI level
$3.4 $34.0
$4.6 $46.0 funding level recommended by NCE
$5.2 $55.2
$3.6 $45.0 includes $9 million in up-front funding and
additional annual funding financed by $300
parcel tax; PCI would remain at 69 at 20 years
with continued funding
$4.6 $55.0 includes $9 million in up-front funding and
additional annual funding financed by $400
parcel tax; PCI would increase to 77 at 20 years
with continued funding
City Council
April 2, 2019
Page 4 of 4
CITY STRATEGIC GOALS:
Updating the PMP is consistent with the City Strategic Goals of Public Health and Safety,
Quality of Life, and Sustainable Infrastructure.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The PMP report offers various funding scenarios using different fund sources. Fiscal
impacts will differ depending on policy direction from the City Council.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Updated PMP Report and Appendices
B. Presentation
ATTACHMENT A
Pavement Management Program
Report
and Appendices
I City of Temple City
Pavement Management Program 2018 Update-Final Report
Table of Contents
Background ..................................................................................................................................... 6
Study Objectives .............................................................................................................................. 6
Scope of Work ................................................................................................................................. 7
Pav e m ent Network and Current Condition .................................................................................... 8
Current Maintenance and Reh abilitation Pr actices ...................................................................... 13
Bud ge t N ee ds Analysis: 10-Year Analysis ..................................................................................... 15
Bud ge t Scenarios: 10-Year Analysis .............................................................................................. 17
Scenario 1: City's Budget ($1.4 Million pe r Year) ...................................................................... 1 8
Scenario 2: Maintain PCI at 58 ($2.5 Million per Ye ar) ............................................................. 19
Scenario 3: Improve PCI to 65 ($3.4 Million per Year) .............................................................. 20
Scenario 4: Improve PCI to 75 ($4.6 Million per Year) .............................................................. 21
Scenario 5: Improve PCI to 80 ($5 .2 Million pe r Year) .............................................................. 22
Recap : 10-Year Budget Scenario Analysis ................................................................................. 23
Funding Scenarios Analysis: 20-Y ea r Analysis ............................................................................... 26
Scenarios 6 (A-D): Varied Up -front Fund s ($8 M, $9 M, $10M, $1 5M) with $100 Tax Rate ...... 27
Scenarios 7 (A -D): Varied Up -front Fund s ($8 M, $9M, $10M, $15M) with $200 Tax Rate ...... 29
Scenarios 8 (A-D): Varied Up -front Fund s ($8M, $9 M , $10M, $15M) with $300 Tax Rate ...... 31
Scenarios 9 (A -D): V aried Up -front Funds ($8M, $9 M , $10M, $15M) with $400 Tax Rate ...... 33
PCI Comparisons between Scenarios w ith the Same Up -front Fund s ...................................... 35
Reca p : 20-Year Funding Scenario Analysis ................................................................................ 37
Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 38
~!NCE Collaboration Comm•tment Confi~once •
2
I City of Temple City
Pavement Management Program 2018 Update-Final Report
Pavement Network and Current Condition
The City is respo nsib le for t h e repair and maintenance of approximately 72.4
centerl i ne miles of streets of which 13.8 mi les are arterials, 38.9 miles are collectors,
and 19.7 miles are residentials.
~.-....-~-..··~ ..... .....--;;;-,~-;;>;· ...... •·..-.;ijo~ ...... ,.. .. ,
Streets and pavements are one of the City's most valuable assets; the
repl~~ement value is estimated to be approxi~ately $104.7 million.
Note that this replacement cost does not include the va l ue of other non-pavement
street components, such as curb and gutters, sidewalks, drainage, etc. The inspection
was also performed on the alley n etwork, but the alleys are not included as part of
the City's street network or the PMP budget analysis. The alley network inventory
and inspection resu lts are li sted in Appendix B.
PCI is a measurement of pavement grade or condition and ranges from 0 to 100. A
newly constructed street will h ave a PCI of 100, whi le a fai led street will have a PCI
of 25 or less. The pavement condition is primari ly aff ected by clima t e, traffic loads
and vo lu mes, su bg rade failure, construction materials and age. Some of the
distresses manifested by the pavement as it ages or fails are:
Asphalt Concrete (AC) Pavement :
• Alligator (Fatigue) Cracking • Patching and Utility Cut Patching
• Bleeding • Polished Aggregate
• Block Cracking • Potho les
• Bumps and Sags • Railroad Crossing
• Corrugation • Rutting
• Depression • Shoving
• Edge Cracking • Slippage Cracking
• Joint Reflection Cracking • Swell
• Lane/ Shoulder Drop-Off • Raveling
• Longitudinal/Transverse Cracking • Weathering
Port land Cement Concrete (PCC) Pavement:
• Blowup/ Buckling • Polished Aggregate
• Corner Break • Po pouts
• Divided Slab • Pumping
• Durability Cracking • Punchout
• Faulting • Railroad Crossing
• Joint Seal Damage • Scaling
~!NCE Collaboration Comm1tment Confidence •
8
I City of Temple City
Pavement Management Program 2018 !Jpdate-Final Report
Budget Needs Analysis: 10-Year Analysis
Once the pavement condition and the appropriate mainte nance have been
determined, it is possible to correlate and determine the funding needed for
maintenance of the City's streets. Simplistically, the StreetSaver® program seeks to
answer the following questions:
. If fun-ding is not a constraint, how much money is neede-d to bring-the .
. pavement condition to a state of good repair? And maintain it at that level
. ·-·. · .. ;·· .. :.'·.· __ -.·.;:'~··:-over the next _lO years?
_ __!_;_,;o__~':._._~__._~· -_,, • • • • ~--------------------
Therefore, based on the principle that it costs less to maintain streets in good
condition, rather than focusing on fi x ing those in poor condition, Str eetSave r®
develops a funding strategy that will improve the overall condition of the streets and
then maintain it at that level. The condition of each street determines the appropriate
t r eatment and cost from the decision tree.
For example, if Avon Avenue has a PCI of 44, and the appropriate treatment is a mill
and overlay with digouts, then the area of the pavement section is multiplied by the
unit cost and the total treatment cost determined. Additional maintenance treatments
over the next 10 years may also be applied (e.g., slurry seal and crack seal) to
preserve it, if necessary.
Using this process, the entire street network for the City was evaluated in this fashion
and summed . This results in maintenance needs of appro x imately $55 .1 million over
the ne x t 10 years at an annual inflation r ate of 3 percent. If the Ci ty follows the needs
funding strategy recommended by the program, the ave r age PCI will fluctuate
between 82 and 85. If, however, no funding is allocated to street pavement
maintenance over the nex t 10 years, the streets will deteriorate and the network PCI
will drop to 35.
The results of the budget nee ds analys is are summarized in Table 3.
Note that in this analysis, the total funding needed is "front-loaded;" i.e., it is less
ex pens ive to repair the streets in the first year than in subsequent years due to the
effect of d e ferring maintenance and inflation. Although very few agencies can afford
this "front loaded" approach, it highlights the ne x t treatment that each street section
n eeds and becomes a reference point for all other funding scenarios.
The first yea r 's budget needs of $29 .1 million is also the City's current deferr ed
maintenance.
~!NCE , Co llabo ration Commrtm•nl Conf idence."
15
I City of Temple City
Pavement Management Program 2018 Update-Final Report
Conclusions
Th e City of Temple City has a substantial investment in its street network with an
estimated total replacement cost of $104.7 million. Overal l, the street netwo rk is in
"Fair" condition with a citywide average PCI of 58. Appro x imately 44 percent of the
City's streets fall in either the "Poor" or "Very Poor" condition categories. At the
current annual funding level of $1.4 million, there is a downward trend in PCI
proj ected over the next 10 years. In addition, the cost of deferred maintenance under
the City's budget will continue to grow dramatically.
a. Pavement Funding
At current funding levels, the PCI will decrease to 49 by FY 2027/28 and the deferred
ma i ntenance will increase to $57.6 million, which is a 98 percent incr ease over the
current level. In addition, th e pe rcentage of streets in the "Very Poo r" condition will
in crease from 9.7 percent to 41.1 percent.
If s ufficient funding is unavailabl e for stre et M&R, the average PCI is expected to
decrease and the deferred ma i ntenance or unfunded bac k log will almost double. The
higher backlog will result in increased future costs, because more capita l -intensi ve
treatments such as reconstruction will be required as less-expens ive treatm en t s such
as surface sea ls or overla y s are no long e r effective.
Th e results of t h e Stree tSaver® budget a nalyses indicated that if a 10-year approach
is adopted, the City would need t o increase the annual pavement fund in g to a
minimum of $4.6 mill ion per year. This funding level will in crease the amount of the
"Good" condition streets from 34.4 percent to 87.5 percent of the network. The PCI
improves t o 75 and the deferred m ainte nance drops to $15.8 million .
I f t h e City adopts a 20-year plan incl ud ing up -front funding a nd a nnu a l parcel taxes,
the r es ults of t he additional scena ri o ana lyses indica t e th a t a parcel ta x of at least
$300 a nnually would be req uired to improve pavement con d itions without i ncreasing
d efe rred mainte nan ce.
b. Pavement Maintenance Strategies
NCE r eco mmend s th at the City consider other treatment options. Micro-surfacing can
be a n a ppropriate treatment for preventive maintenance; full-depth reclamation (FDR)
and co ld -in-p lace re cycli ng (CIR) are a lso a ltern atives to reconstruction. These
t reatmen ts ca n offer approximately 20 to 30 percent in cost savings .
c. Re-inspection Strategies
In order to monitor future pa vemen t performance and on-going maintenance needs,
the Los An ge les County Metro req uires an inventory of city-maintained arteri al and
co ll ector streets in order to b e e ligible for Prop C funds. This inventory upd ate sh o uld
~!NCE Co ll aboration Comm •tmcn t Cnn hdence~
38
f !NCE Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence ~"'
Appendix A
Quality Control Plan
Engi neering & Env iro nment al Ser vices www. ncenet. com
The contents of this report is the confidential property of
NCE and should not be copied, modified, retransmitted, or
used for any purpose except with NCE's written
authorization.
Engineering & Environmental Services www.ncenet.com
Appendix Al
Resumes of Field Inspectors
En gin eer ing & Envi ron me ntal Ser vi ces www. nee net. com
~~~1·.·' . 4 .• :~-... -,. .. ~ ··'-::··. . • • • ....... .
:-;·· "::-:;~:;).:-~I Collaboration. Commitnient.j Confidence~·
\.;:.-\;:.:·);~.~:,.,~;.~:--.:·;...~ ... -.•. _,. ~ .. ~ ..... ~
Jacob Rajnowski
Field Technician
Mr. Rajnowsk i j o ined NCE in 2016 as a as a pavement mana gement
technician and is experi e n ced in co ll ectin g distress data for Pa vement
Ma nagement Syst ems.
Apart from co nducting field inspectio n s, Mr. Rajn owski performs all
fu n ctions related to data co llecti on and is a n active participant in t he QC
process, includ ing cr oss-check s of data in the PMS database, quality
control ch ec ks of field co ll ected data and pa vement maintenance history to
ensure that PM S databases a re accurate and up to date. During this
process, detai le d r eports are generated to perform cross-check s of t he
data col lect ed . Additionally, Mr . Rajnowski h as completed the OCTA
MicroPAVER 'Distress Ide ntificatio n' course for Aspha lt Co ncrete and
Portland Ce ment Pavements.
Representative Projects
Pavement Management
Pavement Management System Updates I Field Technician
Various Cities a nd Counties, CA
Proj ect s included various fo rms of surveys for pa vement distress data
collection, this m ay have included walking, w ind shi e ld, and/or semi-
automat ed.
~· •• Ada County, I D
~· •• Humboldt County
~! Martinez, CA
'-i« •• Pleasant Hill, CA
~· •• San Francisco , CA
t:• •• Stockton, CA
~~ Trinity County, CA
~~ Yolo County, CA
Eng ineer ing & Environmental Ser vices
Education
Sterling High School, Sterling, IL, 2003
Joined NCE
20 16
Registrations and Certifications
OCTA Mi cr o PAVER Certification 2 017
MTC Certification 2016
Total Years of Experience
2 years
www. ncenet.com
f !NCE Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence ~"'
Appendix B
Section Description Inventory
Alley Network
Sorted by Alley Name
Eng ineering & Enviro nt11ellt nl Ser vices www. ncenet. com
Alley Section Description Inventory Report
This report lists a variety of section description information for each of the City's
alley pavement sections. It lists the street and section identifiers, limits, functional
class, surface type, number of lanes, lengths, widths, and inspected 2018 PCI.
All of the City's alley street sections are included in the report. The report is sorted
alphabetically by Alley Name and Section ID. The field descriptions in this report
are listed.
Header
ALLEY NAME
SECTION ID
BEG LOCATION
END LOCATION
FC
SURFACE TYPE
LANES
LENGTH (FT)
WIDTH (FT)
AREA (SF)
2013 PCI
2018 INSPECTED PCI
~!NCE
Description
The name of the alley
Section identification number in StreetSaver® unique for
each section of one alley
Beginning limit of the alley section
Ending limit of the alley section
Functional Classification (0 -Other)
Surface Type (0 -AC/AC = AC Overlay of AC Pavement)
Number of lanes of the alley section
Length of the alley section in feet
Average width of the alley section in feet
Area of the alley section in square feet
Average 2013 PCI for the alley section
Average 2018 inspected PCI for the alley section
~!N CE
Engineering & Environnt cniCJ I Services
City of Temple City
2018 PMP Update
Alley PCI Listing
1 of 2
Sorted by Name
www. nee net. com
f !NCE Collaboration . Commitment. Confidence ~"
Appendix C
Section Description Inventory
Section PCI Listing -Street Network
I. Sorted by Street Name
II. Sorted by Descending PCI
t:. nginee r mg & l:.nv n on mentr1l Set vtces www. ncenet. com
Section Description Inventory Report
This report lists a variety of section description information for each of the City's
street pavement sections. It lists the section identifiers, limits, functional class,
surface type, number of lanes, lengths, widths, and inspected 2018 PCI.
All of the City's vehicular street sections are included in the report. The report is
sorted alphabetically by Street Name and Section ID and by descending PCis. The
field descriptions in this report are listed. .. __
Header
STREET NAME
SECTION ID
BEG LOCATION
END LOCATION
FC
SURFACE TYPE
LANES
LENGTH {FT)
WIDTH (FT)
AREA (SF)
..
LAST M&R DATE
LAST M&R TREATMENT
2018 INSPECTED PCI
~!NCE
Description
The name of the street as indicated by street signs in
the field
Section identification number in StreetSaver® unique
for each section of one street
Beginning limit of the section
Ending li~it of the section
Functional Classification (A -Arterial, C -Collector, R
-Residentia 1/ Loca I)
Surface Type (0 -AC/AC = AC Overlay of AC
Pavement, PCC = Portland Cement Concrete Pavement)
Number of lanes of the section
Length of the section in feet
Average width of the section in feet
Area of the section in square feet
Date of the last treatment on the section
Type of the last treatment on the section
Average 2018 inspected PCI for the section.
Collaboration . Commitment. Confidence ~
Sorted by Street Name
Engin ee rin g & Environme ntal Ser vtces www. nee net. com
t !NCE
Engi neo rinp, & Environmen tal Se rvi ces
City of Temple City
2018 PMP Update
PCI Listing-Street Network
2 of 10
Sorted by Street Name
WWW.frl.HOP.I , t tlfll
t !NCE
Eng ineer i ng & Environm ental Se rvices
City of Temple City
2018 PMP Update
PCI Usllng -Street Network
4 of 10
Sorted by Street Name
www.rrc.~n~/.( un1
t !NCE
Enp irwe rln r. & fnvironmen tal Servi ces
City of Temple City
2018 PMP Update
PCI Ustlna ·Stree t Network
6 of 10
Soned by Street ~a me
WWW.fll.t-!IJ~I.l 0111
t !NCE
Eng int>erinr, & Enviro nrnc n lal Services
City of Temple Ci ty
2018 PMP Update
PCI List In&· Street Network
Sol 10
Sorted by Street Name
WWW.fH P.fU."'f. (CUll
t !NCE
t iiHi lleer inp, & f nvir nnmen tal Servi ce<:
City of Temple City
2018 PMP Update
PCillstlns · Street Network
lOof 10
Sorted by Street Name
WWW.fll.P.flt-'/.c ()Ill
f !NCE Collaboration . Commitment. Confidence :~
Sorted by Descending PCI
Engineering & l:.nv ironmental Services www. ncenet. com
t !NCE
Eng1necring & Envi10nmenlal Services
City of Temple City
2018 PMP Update
PCI Ustln& ·Street Network
I of 10
Sorted by Descending PCI
WWW.IIU-!111-'f.IIJ/11
t !NCE
Ln pmee r inp, & Env ir on m en tal Se rvices
City of Temple City
2018 PMP Update
PCI Ustln1 · Street Network
3 o l10
Sorted by o~scendln1 PCI
www .nt.~rtt-~l . l fJtll
t !NCE
fngmt>er ing & Enviro nmen ta l S!'rviccs
City of Temple Cit y
2018 PMP Update
PCI Listing-Str eet Netwo1k
S o f JO
Sorted by Descending PCt
WWW.fll ~liP/.( CUll
t !NCE
Cng inc.>e rinJ'( & f r rvironmen tal Se rvices
City of Temple City
2018 PMP Update
PCI Llstlns · Street Network
7ol 10
Sorted by Descending PCI
WWW.fll.Hflt-'1. f llf11
~!NCE
Enp,inecrinp, & fnvi romnc ntal Sr rvi ces
Clly of Temple City
2018 PMP Update
Pet Ustlns · Street Netw ork
9of 10
Sorted by Descending PCI
www.rrt t-!fl~l. (urn
f !NCE Collaboration . Commitment. Confidence ~"
Appendix D
Maintenance and Rehabilitation
(M&R) Decision Tree
l11 g irt eP 1111 g & Env i ronn 1ent al Ser vices www. nee net. com
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Decision Tree
This report presents the current maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) decision tree
that exists in the database. The decision tree forms the basis for all of the
budgetary computations that are included in this volume. Changes to the
decision tree will make the results in the budget reports invalid. All
pavement treatment unit costs relevant to the street types in the database were
updated.
The decision tree lists the treatments and costs selected for preventive
maintenance and rehabilitation activities . Each line represents a specific
combination of functional classification and surface type.
The preventive maintenance portion of the report is identified as Condition Category
I -Good. All preventive maintenance treatment listings are assigned only to
sections in Condition Category I. Street sections with PCI values under this range
are assigned to treatments listed in Categories II through V.
In the preventive maintenance category, a time sequence is us e d to identify the
appropriate treatment and cost. Each preventive maintenance treatment
description consists of three parts: 1) a CRACK treatment, 2) a SURFACE treatment,
and 3) a RESTORATION treatment. These three parts allow the user to specify one
of three different preventive maintenance treatments depending on the prior
maintenance history of the section.
1. The CRACK treatment part can be used to specify the most frequent
type of preventive maintenance activity planned (typically crack seals).
2. The SURFACE treatment part can be used to specify more extensive
and less frequent preventive maintenance activities, such as chip seals
or slurry seals. For example, a crack seal can be specified on a 3-year
cycle with a slurry seal specified after seven years.
3 . The RESTORATION part can be used to specify a surface restoration
treatment (such as an overlay) to be performed after a specified
number of surface treatments . For example, after three successive
slurry seals, an overlay can be specified instead of another slurry seal.
Rehabilitation treatments are assigned to sections in Condition Categories II
through V. Each line is defined by a specific combination of functional classification,
surface type, and condition category.
The City adjusted the PCI thresholds for budget analysis in StreeSaver® for
different functional classifications to meet the goal of improving the PCI.
• Arterial
o Good 75-100
o Fair 60-74
o Poor 40-59
o Very Poor 0-39
t !NCE
" C o l l e c t o r
0 G o o d 7 0 - 1 0 0
0 F a i r 5 5 - 6 9
0 P o o r 3 5 - 5 4
0 V e r y P o o r 0 - 3 4
" R e s i d e n t i a l
0 G o o d 7 0 - 1 0 0
0 F a i r 5 0 - 6 9
0 P o o r 2 5 - 4 9
0 V e r y P o o r 0 - 2 4
C O L U M N D E S C R I P T I O N
F u n c t i o n a l C l a s s F u n c t i o n a l C l a s s i f i c a t i o n i d e n t i f y i n g t h e b r a n c h n u m b e r .
S u r f a c e T y p e i d e n t i f y i n g t h e b r a n c h n u m b e r . S u r f a c e T y p e ( A C = A C
S u r f a c e P a v e m e n t , A C / A C = A C O v e r l a y o f A C P a v e m e n t , A C / P C C = A C O v e r l a y o f P C C
P a v e m e n t , P C C = P C C P a v e m e n t , S T = S u r f a c e t r e a t m e n t o v e r g r a v e l
b a s e / s u b g r a d e ) .
C o n d i t i o n C o n d i t i o n C a t e g o r y ( I t h r o u g h V ) . C a t e g o r y
F i r s t R o w ( C r a c k T r e a t m e n t ) i n d i c a t e s l o c a l i z e d t r e a t m e n t ( e . g . c r a c k s e a l i n g ) .
T r e a t m e n t T y p e S e c o n d R o w ( S u r f a c e T r e a t m e n t ) i n d i c a t e s s u r f a c e t r e a t m e n t ( e . g .
m i c r o s u r f a c i n g ) .
T h i r d R o w ( R e s t o r a t i o n T r e a t m e n t ) I n d i c a t e s s u r f a c e r e s t o r a t i o n ( e . g . o v e r l a y ) .
T r e a t m e n t N a m e o f t r e a t m e n t s f r o m t h e " T r e a t m e n t D e s c r i p t i o n s " r e p o r t .
C o s t / S q Y d , e x c e p t A v e r a g e u n i t c o s t p e r s q u a r e y a r d f o r e a c h t r e a t m e n t e x c e p t f o r " S E A L
S e a l C r a c k s i n L F C R A C K S " w h i c h i s c o s t p e r l i n e a r f e e t .
Y r s . B e t w e e n F i r s t R o w - n u m b e r o f y e a r s b e t w e e n s u c c e s s i v e t r e a t m e n t a p p l i c a t i o n s
C r a c k S e a l s s p e c i f i e d i n t h e f i r s t r o w ( i . e . C R A C K t r e a t m e n t ) .
Y r s . B e t w e e n S e c o n d R o w - n u m b e r o f y e a r s b e t w e e n s u c c e s s i v e t r e a t m e n t a p p l i c a t i o n s
S u r f a c e S e a l s s p e c i f i e d i n t h e s e c o n d r o w ( i . e . S U R F A C E t r e a t m e n t ) .
# o f S u r f a c e S e a l s N u m b e r o f t i m e s t h a t t h e t r e a t m e n t a p p l i c a t i o n i n t h e s e c o n d r o w ( i . e .
b e f o r e O v e r l a y S U R F A C E t r e a t m e n t ) w i l l b e p e r f o r m e d p r i o r t o p e r f o r m i n g t h e t r e a t m e n t
a p p l i c a t i o n i n t h e t h i r d r o w .
T r e a t m e n t s h i g h l i g h t e d i n y e l l o w i n d i c a t e d t h a t a s p e c i f i c f u n c t i o n a l c l a s s a n d
s u r f a c e c o m b i n a t i o n d o e s n o t e x i s t w i t h i n t h e C i t y ( i . e . a n A C o v e r l a y o f P C C
p a v e m e n t a r t e r i a l s t r e e t , a s u r f a c e - t r e a t e d c o l l e c t o r s t r e e t , e t c . ) . T h e r e f o r e ,
t r e a t m e n t s f o r t h e s e f u n c t i o n a l c l a s s a n d s u r f a c e c o m b i n a t i o n w i l l b e " D o N o t h i n g " .
N o t e t h a t t h e t r e a t m e n t s a s s i g n e d t o e a c h s e c t i o n s h o u l d n o t b e b l i n d l y f o l l o w e d i n
p r e p a r i n g a s t r e e t m a i n t e n a n c e p r o g r a m . E n g i n e e r i n g j u d g m e n t a n d p r o j e c t l e v e l
a n a l y s i s s h o u l d b e a p p l i e d t o e n s u r e t h a t t h e t r e a t m e n t i s a p p r o p r i a t e a n d c o s t
e f f e c t i v e f o r t h e s e c t i o n .
~ ! N C E
I Temple City Decision Tree
Printed : 07/09/201 8
Cost /Sq Yd, i #of Surface
Functional Clas s S urface Condition Cat egory Treatment Type Treatment except Seal Yrs B etween 1 Yr s Between Seals before
Cracks In LF: J Crack Seals Surface Seals Overlay
IResidentiai/Local lAC 1-Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 4
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 8
I Restoration Treatme nt DO NOTHING $0.00 3
I
II - Fair, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
~II -Fair, Load Rela ted DO NOTHING $0.00
IV-Poor DO NOTHING $0 .00
IV -Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
AC/AC 11-Good Crack Treatment ~S EAL CRACKS $1.00 5
I Surface Treatment SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK SEAL $2.90 7 ,
Restoration Treatme nt 2" MILL AND OVERLAY $1 5 .75 3
Ill-Fair, Non-Load Related !SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK SEAL (3% $4 .50
DIG OUTS)
Ill -Fair, Load Related
r
12 " MILL AND OVERLAY $15.75
IV-Poor J2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5% DI GOUTS) $24.25 I
V-Very Poor JRECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $63.75 1
IACIPCC ~1-Good I Cra ck Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 4
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 8
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 3
111-Fair, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
Ill-Fair, L oad Related DO NOTHING $0.00
l iV-Poor DO NOTHIN G $0.00 I
I
V-Very Poor OONOTHING $0.00 I
I
PCC 1-Good I Crack Treatment OONOTHING $0.00 4
J Surface Treatment DO NOTHIN G $0.00 99
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 100
II-Fair, Non-Load Related DO NOTH IN G $0.00
Ill -Fair, Load Related l DO NOTHING $0.00
IV-Poor DO NOTH ING $0.00
V-Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 5 MTC Street Saver
m Temp le Cily Decision Tree
&ill Prin ted: 07/09/2 018
Cost/Sq Yd' Yr s Betw een Yrs Between #of Surface
Function al Class Su rfac e Con dition C ateg ory Treatment Type T reatment except Seal Surfac e Seal s Seals before
Crac ks In L F: Crack Seal s Overlay
Oth er AC 1-Good Crack Treatment DO NOTH ING $0.00
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 8
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 3
II -Fair, Non-Load Related DO NOTH ING $0.00
Ill -Fair , Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV -Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V -Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
ACIAC 1-Good Crack Treatment S EAL C RACK S $1.00 5
1 Surface Treatm ent I SLURRY S EAL AND CRACK SEAL $2.90
Restoration Treatm ent 12" MIL L AND O VERLAY $1 5.75 3
II -Fair, Non-Load Re lated S LURRY SEAL AND CRACK SEAL (3% $4.50
D IG OUTS )
Ill -Fair, Load Related 2" MILL AND OVER LAY $1 5.7 5
IV -Poor 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5% DI GOUTS ) $24.25
V -Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $63.75
ACIPCC 1-Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 4
Surface Treatm en t DO NOTHING $0.00 8
Restoration T reatment DO NOTHING $0.00 3
II -Fair, Non-Load Re lated DO NOTHING $0.00
Ill - Fair, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV-Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V -Very Poor DO NOTH ING $0.00
PCC 1-Good Crack Trea tm ent DO NOTHING $0.00 9
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 100
II -Fair, Non-Lo ad Re lated DO NO THING $0.00
Ill -Fair, Load Related DO NO THING $0.00
IV -Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V -Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
Fun ctional Class and Surface combi nation not used
Criteria: 7 MTC StreetSaver
I Temple City Needs -Rehabilitation
Treatment/Cost Summary
Inflation Rate = 3.00 % Printed: 07/05/2018
Treatment Year Area Treated Cost
2" MILL AND OVERLAY 2018 8,928.78 sq.yd. $140,629
2020 673.11 sq . yd. $11,248
Total 9,601.89 sq . yd. $151 ,877
2" MILL AND OVERLAY (10% DIGOUTS) 2018 135,761.44 sq.yd. $3,667,875
2019 11,746.89 sq .yd. $327,456
2020 30,045.33 sq .yd. $862,012
2021 5,430.67 sq .yd. $161,711
2022 2,031 .56 sq .yd . $62,309
2023 15,660.67 sq .yd . $494,725
2024 2,031 .56 sq.yd. $66,103
2025 10,344 sq.yd. $346,670
Total 213,052.11 sq.yd . $5,988,861
2" MILL AND OVERLAY (15% DIGOUTS) 2018 72,057.33 sq.yd . $2,305,838
2019 24,666.67 sq.yd. $813,014
Total 96,724 sq.yd. $3,118,852
2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5% DIGOUTS) 2018 177,134.89 sq.yd . $4,079,540
2019 10,693.11 sq.yd . $251,474
2020 18,020.11 sq.yd . $449,999
2021 13,944.89. sq.yd. $358,319
2022 17,942.22 sq.yd . $452,502
2024 9,321.78 sq.yd . $257,130
2025 3,653.33 sq.yd. $99,973
2026 2 ,102.22 sq.yd. $59,253
Total 252,812.56 sq.yd . $6,008,190
DEEP PATCH (25%) 2027 2 ,799.33 sq.yd . $102,270
Total 2 ,799.33 sq.yd . $102,270
SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK SEAL (2% DIGOUTS) 2018 14,890.67 sq.yd . $71,477
2019 12,316 .56 sq.yd . $60,897
2020 9 ,859.56 sq.yd. $50,211
2022 5 ,258.67 sq.yd . $28,410
2023 6,912 sq.yd. $38,462
2024 12,316 .56 sq.yd . $70,596
2025 6,464 sq.yd . $38,161
2027 1,880.89 sq.yd . $11 ,780
Total 69,898 .89 sq.yd . $369,994
SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK SEAL (3% DIGOUTS) 2018 22,797.33 sq.yd . $102,588
2019 9,243.33 sq.yd. $42,846
2020 2,359.56 sq.yd. $11,266
2021 9,964 .89 sq.yd. $49,003
2023 13,935.78 sq.yd. $72,702
Total 58,300.89 sq.yd . $278,405
RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) 2018 280,854.11 sq.yd. $18 ,588,803
2019 66,571 .11 sq. yd. $4 ,509,804
2020 51,208.11 sq.yd. $3,625,827
2021 64,746.56 sq.yd. $4,630,013
2022 41,414.56 sq .yd . $3,029,499
2023 9,039.67 sq .yd. $668,070
Criteria : MTC StreetSaver
SS1 010
Needs -Rehabilitation Treatment/Cost Summary
This report summarizes each rehabilitation treatment type, quantity of pavement
affected, and total costs over the ten-year period. It also summarizes the total
quantities and costs over the next ten years.
COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Treatment Type of rehabilitation treatments needed .
Year Year in the analysis period (i.e. 2017, 2018, 2019, etc).
Area Treated Quantities in square yard.
Cost Rehabilitation treatment cost.
~!NCE
f !NCE Collaboration . Commitment. Confidence ~"'
Appendix E
Budget Needs
I. Projected PCI/Cost Summary
II. Rehabilitation Treatment/Cost Summary
III. Preventive Maintenance Treatment/Cost
Summary
Engineering & Environmental Services www. ncenet. com
Budget Needs Reports
The purpose of this module is to answer the question: If the City had all the
money in the world, what sections should be fixed and how much will it
cost? Based on the M&R decision tree and the PCis of the sections, the program
will then select a mainte nance or rehabilitation action and compute the total
costs over a period of ten years. The Budget Needs represents the "ideal
world" funding levels, while the Budget Scenarios reports in the next section
represent the most "cost effective" prioritization possible for the actual funding
levels .
A budget needs analysis has been performed. The summary results from the
analysis are shown below. An interest rate of 3% and an inflation factor of 3%
were used to project the costs for the next ten years. Thi s report shows the total
ten-year budget that would be required to meet the City's standards as
exemplified iD the M&R d ec ision tree.
As indi cate d in the report, with a budget of $55 .1 million ove r the ne x t ten years
the PCI of the street network will improve from the current level of 58 to 82 by
fiscal year (FY) 2027/28. If no treatments are programm ed, th e weighted average
PCI is projected to deteriorate to 35 by FY 2027/28.
Budget Needs reports included in this volume are listed below:
~ Proj ected PCI/Co st Summary
~ Pre v e ntativ e Maintenan ce Treatment/Cost Summary
~ Re h ab ilitation Treatm e nt/Cost Summary
~!NCE
Needs -Projected PCI/Cost Summary
This report summarizes and projects the City's network PC! values over a ten-
year period, both with and without treatments applied. These costs are based on
those in the M&R decision tree. It also projects the costs over a ten-year period.
COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Year Year in the analysis period.
PCI Treated Projected network average PCI with all needed treatments applied.
PCI Untreated Projected network average PCI without any treatments applied.
PM Cost Total preventive mainte nance treatment cost.
Rehab Cost Total rehabilitation treatment cost.
Cost The budget required for each year in the analysis period to meet the
City's standard as shown on the M&R decision tree.
Total Cost Total budget required over a ten-year period.
~!N CE
" T e m p l e C i t y N e e d s - P r o j e c t e d P C I / C o s t S u m m a r y " I n f l a t i o n R a t e = 3 . 0 0 % P r i n t e d : 0 7 / 0 5 / 2 0 1 8
Y e a r P C I T r e a t e d P C I U n t r e a t e d P M C o s t R e h a b C o s t C o s t
2 0 1 8 8 3 5 8 $ 5 6 , 7 9 6 $ 2 8 , 9 5 6 , 7 5 0 $ 2 9 , 0 1 3 , 5 4 6
2 0 1 9 8 2 5 5 $ 0 $ 6 , 0 0 5 , 4 9 1 $ 6 , 0 0 5 , 4 9 1
2 0 2 0 8 3 5 2 $ 3 , 3 9 6 $ 5 , 0 1 0 , 5 6 3 $ 5 , 0 1 3 , 9 5 9
2 0 2 1 8 5 5 0 $ 7 , 7 7 5 $ 5 , 1 9 9 , 0 4 6 $ 5 , 2 0 6 , 8 2 1
2 0 2 2 8 5 4 7 $ 1 6 , 3 1 1 $ 3 , 5 7 2 , 7 2 0 $ 3 , 5 8 9 , 0 3 1
2 0 2 3 8 4 4 5 $ 2 4 4 , 6 2 7 $ 1 , 2 7 3 , 9 5 9 $ 1 , 5 1 8 , 5 8 6
2 0 2 4 8 4 4 2 $ 2 7 6 , 6 7 6 $ 1 , 6 9 5 , 6 9 6 $ 1 , 9 7 2 , 3 7 2
2 0 2 5 8 5 4 0 $ 1 , 3 6 8 , 4 1 9 $ 9 5 3 , 2 8 2 $ 2 , 3 2 1 , 7 0 1
2 0 2 6 8 3 3 7 $ 1 0 7 , 6 4 9 $ 5 9 , 2 5 3 $ 1 6 6 , 9 0 2
2 0 2 7 8 2 3 5 $ 1 8 1 , 9 5 0 $ 1 1 4 , 0 5 0 $ 2 9 6 , 0 0 0
% P M P M T o t a l C o s t R e h a b T o t a l C o s t T o t a l C o s t
4 . 1 1 % $ 2 , 2 6 3 , 5 9 9 $ 5 2 , 8 4 0 , 8 1 0 $ 5 5 , 1 0 4 , 4 0 9
C r i t e r i a : M T C S t r e e t S a v e r
S S 1 0 0 8
~ TomploCUy
Treatm e nt
Crit eria:
Yea r
202 4
2025
Tot al
2
881010
Needs -Rehabilitation
Treatment/Cost Summary
Inflation Rate =
A rea Treated
17,102.56 sq.yd.
5,975.11 sq.yd.
536,9 11 .78 sq .yd.
3.00 % Prin ted: 07/05/2018
Cost
$1,301,867
$468,478
$36,822 ,361
Total Cost $52,840,810 --------~~~--
MTC 8treet8aver
Needs-Preventive Maintenance Treatment/Cost Summary
This report summarizes each preventive maintenance treatment type, quantity of
pavement affected, and total costs over the ten-year period. It also summarizes
the total quantities and costs over the next ten years.
COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Treatment Type of preventive maintenance treatments n eeded.
Year Year in the analysis period (i.e. 2017, 2018, 2019, etc).
Area Treated Quantities in linear feet (Seal Cracks) or square yard (REAS).
Cost Maintenance treatment cost.
~!NCE
" T e m p l e C i t y N e e d s - P r e v e n t i v e M a i n t e n a n c e
T r e a t m e n t / C o s t S u m m a r y " I n f l a t i o n R a t e = 3 . 0 0 % P r i n t e d : 0 7 / 0 5 / 2 0 1 8
T r e a t m e n t Y e a r A r e a T r e a t e d C o s t
2 " M I L L A N D O V E R L A Y 2 0 2 5 1 , 5 1 4 . 6 7 s q . y d . $ 3 0 , 2 7 2
T o t a l 1 , 5 1 4 . 6 7 $ 3 0 , 2 7 2
S E A L C R A C K S 2 0 2 0 3 7 9 . 7 3 f l . $ 4 0 4
2 0 2 1 1 , 8 6 1 . 1 f l . $ 2 , 0 3 9
2 0 2 2 2 , 1 4 6 . 7 f t . $ 2 , 4 2 6
2 0 2 3 6 , 3 3 2 . 7 2 f l . $ 7 , 3 9 5
2 0 2 4 7 1 1 . 0 5 f t . $ 8 5 7
2 0 2 5 9 3 7 . 7 8 f l . $ 1 , 1 6 2
2 0 2 6 4 8 4 . 2 1 f l . $ 6 1 9
2 0 2 7 6 6 3 . 4 f t . $ 8 7 1
T o t a l 1 3 , 5 1 6 . 7 $ 1 5 , 7 7 3
S L U R R Y S E A L A N D C R A C K S E A L 2 0 1 8 1 8 , 9 8 5 . 7 8 s q . y d . $ 5 6 , 7 9 6
2 0 2 0 9 4 0 s q . y d . $ 2 , 9 9 2
2 0 2 1 1 , 8 0 9 . 7 8 s q . y d . $ 5 , 7 3 6
2 0 2 2 4 , 2 5 3 . 7 8 s q . y d . $ 1 3 , 8 8 5
2 0 2 3 6 8 , 2 1 1 . 5 6 s q . y d . $ 2 3 7 , 2 3 2
2 0 2 4 7 7 , 5 6 1 . 3 3 s q . y d . $ 2 7 5 , 8 1 9
2 0 2 5 3 6 7 , 0 5 4 s q . y d . $ 1 , 3 3 6 , 9 8 5
2 0 2 6 2 8 , 6 8 1 . 3 3 s q . y d . $ 1 0 7 , 0 3 0
2 0 2 7 4 6 , 8 3 8 . 1 1 s q . y d . $ 1 8 1 , 0 7 9
T o t a l 6 1 4 , 3 3 5 . 6 7 $ 2 , 2 1 7 , 5 5 4
T o t a l Q u a n t i t y 6 2 9 , 3 6 7 . 0 3 $ 2 , 2 6 3 , 5 9 9
C r i t e r i a : M T C S t r e e t S a v e r
S S 1 0 0 7
f !NCE Collaboration . Commitment. Confidence ~"'
Appendix F
Scenario 1-5
I. Cost Summary .
II. Network Condition Summary
Engi rt eer in g & f:nv iro nrn enta l Se r v1ces www. nee net. com
I Temple City Scenarios-Cost Summary
Interest: 3.00% Inflation: 3 .00% Printed: 09/28/2018
Scenario 1: City's Budget
Preventative
Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Maintenance Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap
2018 2% $1,601,215 II $75 1,067 Non-$26,285 $1,715 $26,598,024 Funded $0
Ill $233,302 Project Unmet $274,214
IV $375,844 Project $0
v $0
Total $1,360,213
Project $0
2019 0% $1,400,000 II $103,743 Non-$0 $0 $29,358,042 Funded $0
Ill $210,430 Project Unmet $61,733
IV $1,084,328 Project $0
v $0
Total $1 ,398 ,501
Project $0
2020 0% $1,400,000 II $59 ,853 Non-$3,396 $0 $32,493,320 Funded $0
Ill $432,532 Project Unmet $50,077
IV $899,83 1 Project $0
v $0
Total $1,392,216
Project $0
2021 0% $1,400 ,000 II $37,954 Non -$1,217 $0 $35,887,621 Funded $0
Ill $275,698 Project Unmet $56,408
IV $1,085,129 Project $0
v $0
Total $1,398 ,781
Project $0
2022 2% $1,400,000 II $56,093 Non-$22,863 $5,137 $41,866,732 Funded $0
Ill $186,742 Project Unmet $36,989
IV $1 ,128,329 Project $0
v $0
Total $1,371 '164
Project $0
2023 10% $1,400,000 II $94,434 Non-$166,451 $0 $44,746 ,994 Funded $0
Ill $85,588 Project Unmet $324,564
IV $1,048,983 Project $0
v $0
Total $1,229,005
Project $0
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class <> 0 -Other MTC StreetSaver
SS1034
Preventative
Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Maintenance
2024 14% $1,400,000 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
2025 15% $1,400,000 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
2026 15% $1,400,000 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
2027 8% $1,400,000 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
Summary
Functional Class
Arterial
Collector
Residential/Local
Grand Total:
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class<> 0-Other
$119,977 Non-
$321,231 Project
$256,911 Project
$500,973
$1,199,092
$0
$50,632 Non-
$445,355 Project
$0 Project
$691,515
$1,187,502
$0
$154,646 Non-
$181,446 Project
$0 Project
$844,049
$1,180,141
$0
$160,385 Non-
$102,270 Project
$0 Project
$981,819
$1,244,474
$0
Rehabilitation
$5,069,899
$5,855,578
$2,035,612
$12,961,089
2
881034
$197,831
$0
$211,264
$0
$218,466
$0
$153,846
$0
Prev. Maint.
$201,215
$868,053
$133,566
$1,001,619
Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap
$0 $48,270,397 Funded $0
Unmet $91,922
$0 $51,397,779 Funded $0
Unmet $67,396
$0 $54,447,216 Funded $0
Unmet $93,532
$0 $56,581,859 Funded $0
Unmet $57,885
Funded Unmet
Stop Gap Stop Gap
$0 $87,734
$0 $713,094
$0 $313,891
$0 $1,114,720
MTC StreetSaver
Interest: 3% Inflation: 3% Pr inte d: 0912812018
I Temple Cit, Scenarios -Network Condition Summary
Scenario 1: C ity's Budget
Year Budget PM Year Budg et PM Year Budget PM
2018 $1,400,000 0% 2022 $1,400,000 2% 2026 $1,400 ,000 15 %
2019 $1,400,000 0% 2023 $1,400 ,000 10% 2027 $1,400 ,000 8%
2020 $1,400,000 0% 2024 $1,400,000 14%
2021 $1,400 ,000 0% 2025 $1,400,000 15%
Projected Network Average PCI by year
Year Never Tr eated With Se lected Treatment Treated Treated
Centerli ne Miles Lane Mi les
2018 59 6 1 7.70 16.64
201 9 55 58 2.74 7 .09
2020 53 57 3.17 7.28
2021 50 56 4.22 9 .83
2022 48 55 7.85 16.53
2023 45 54 9.59 19.18
2024 43 53 6.00 12.62
2025 40 51 6.02 12.72
2026 38 50 5.49 10.98
2027 35 49 6 .2 1 12.42
Percent Network Area by Fun ct ional Class and Condition Category
Condition in base year 2018, prior to applying treatments .
Condition Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
15.5% 14 .3% 4 .1% 0.0 % 33.8%
11 /111 3.3% 6 .1 % 4 .2% 0.0% 13.6%
IV 5.2% 18.1% 11 .7% 0.0 % 35.0%
v 1.9% 11 .7% 4.0% 0.0% 17 .6%
Total 25.8% 50.2% 24.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition in year 2018 after schedu lable treatments applied .
Cond ition Arter ial Collector . Res /Loc Other To t al
17.8% 15.7% 5.7% 0.0% 39.3%
11 /111 1.6% 4.8% 2.5% 0 .0% 8.9%
IV 4 .5% 18.0% 11 .7% 0.0% 34.2%
v 1.9% 11 .7% 4.0% 0.0% 17.6%
Total 25.8% 50.2% 24.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition in year 2 027 after schedulable treatments applied .
Condition Arterial Collecto r Res /Loc Ot her Total
22 .6% 23.5% 9.2% 0.0% 55.4 %
11 /111 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4%
IV 0 .0% 0.0% 1.9% 0.0% 1.9%
v 2.9% 26.6% 12.9% 0.0% 42.4 %
Total 25.8% 50.2% 24.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Criteria : MTC Stree tSaver
SS1035
Sce narios Criteria : Fun ctio nal Class <> 0 -Other
Bl Temple City Scenarios-Cost Summary -Interest: 3.00% Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 07/0512018
Scenario 2: Maintain PCI 58
Preventative
Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Maintenance Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap
2018 0% $2,500,000 II $751,067 Non-$1,157 $0 $25,485,789 Funded $0
Ill $330,615 Project Unmet $267,048
IV $1,415,896 Project $0
v $0
Total $2,497,578
Project $0
2019 0% $2,500,000 II $103,743 Non-$0 $0 $27,701,047 Funded $0
Ill $110,197 Project Unmet $56,651
IV $2,280,167 Project $0
v $0
Total $2,494,107
Project $0
2020 0% $2,500,000 II $59,853 Non-$3,396 $0 $30,011,481 Funded $0
Ill $700,200 Project Unmet $50,077
IV $1,735,186 Project $0
v $0
Total $2,495,239
Project $0
2021 0% $2,500,000 II $37,954 Non-$7,775 $0 $33,318,429 Funded $0
Ill $98,225 Project Unmet $56,764
IV $2,349,921 Project $0
v $0
Total $2,486,100
Project $0
2022 0% $2,500,000 II $28,410 Non-$2,426 $0 $37,844,220 Funded $0
Ill $571,453 Project Unmet $34,091
IV $629,268 Project $0
v $1,261,701
Total $2,490,832
Project $0
2023 4% $2,500,000 II $94,434 Non-$98,805 $1,195 $38,764,726 Funded $0
Ill $298,624 Project Unmet $270,059
IV $0 Project $0
v $2,004,297
Total $2,397,355
Project $0
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class<> 0-Other MTC SlreetSaver
SS1034
Preventative
Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Maintenance
2024 5% $2,500,000 II $122,821 Non-$128,486
Ill $249,521 Project
IV $158,364 Project $0
v
Total
Project
2025 6% $2,500,000 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
2026 7% $2,500,000 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
2027 8% $2,500,000 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
Summary
Functional Class
Arterial
Collector
Residential/Local
Total:
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class <> 0 -Other
$1,837,755
$2,368,461
$0
$190,922 Non-
$934,028 Project
$0 Project
$1,204,697
$2,329,647
$0
$5,090 Non-
$420,847 Project
$0 Project
$1,893,921
$2,319,858
$0
$152,645 Non-
$174,503 Project
$0 Project
$1,972,245
$2,299,393
$0
Rehabilitation
$6,438,500
$14,758,155
$2,981,915
,-"=~'="·===,=·
$24,178,570
2
SS1034
$169,870
$0
$178,717
$0
$198,264
$0
Prev. Main!.
$0
$773,561
$15,335
""~-·=·~=·~···=·~·-
$788,896
Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap
$0 $39,455,372 Funded $0
Unmet $65,624
$0 $40,280,434 Funded $0
Unmet $48,982
$0 $42,210,478 Funded $0
Unmet $76,041
$1,736 $42,875,392 Funded $0
Unmet $49,680
Funded Unmet
Stop Gap Stop Gap
$0 $61,544
$0 $603,159
$0 $310,316
>="==~·-=•~""oe"'"""'"'
$975,019
MTC StreetSaver
~~ TempleC;ty Scenarios -Network Co ndition S u mmary
Int erest : 3% Inflat io n: 3% Printed: 07/05/2018
Scenario 2: M a inta in PCI 58
Year B udget PM Year Budget PM Year Budget PM
2018 $2,500,000 0% 2022 $2,500,000 0% 2026 $2,500,000 7%
2019 $2,500,000 0% 2023 $2,500,000 4 % 2027 $2,500,000 8%
2020 $2,500,000 0% 202 4 $2 ,500,000 5%
202 1 $2,500,000 0% 2025 $2,500,000 6%
P roj ect e d N e two rk A v erage P C I by y ear
Yea r Never Treated Wi th Se lected Treatmen t Treated Treated
Centerli n e Mi les Lane Mi les
2018 59 61 8.44 19.72
2019 55 60 3.80 10.80
2020 53 60 5.8 1 11 .6 1
202 1 50 60 7.96 15.92
2022 47 60 7.38 16.05
2023 45 59 8.37 16.75
2024 42 59 6.41 12.83
2025 40 58 10 .3 4 21.31
2026 37 58 8.78 17.78
2027 35 58 7.54 15.08
Per cent N etwo r k A r ea by Fun c ti o n a l C l ass a nd Con d itio n Cat e g o r y
Conditio n i n b ase yea r 2018, p ri or t o a pp l y in g t rea t men ts .
Co nd i t ion A r te ri al Collect or Res/Loc Oth er Total
14.9% 14.3% 4.1% 0.0% 33 .2%
11/111 3.9% 6.1% 4.2% 0.0% 14.2%
IV 5.2% 18.1% 11 .7% 0 .0% 35.0%
v 1.9% 11.7% 4.0% 0.0% 17 .6%
To t al 25.8% 50 .2% 24 .0% 0.0% 100.0%
Co n d itio n in year 2 01 8 after sch edul ab l e treat m ent s app l ied .
Cond itio n Arterial Co ll ec t or Res/Loc Other To t al
I 19.8% 16 .2% 5.7% 0.0% 41 .7%
11 /111 1.6% 4.5% 2.5% 0.0% 8.6%
IV 2.5% 17.9% 11.7% 0.0% 32 .1%
v 1.9% 11.7% 4.0% 0.0% 17.6%
To t al 25.8% 50.2% 24.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Co nditio n i n y ear 2027 after sch ed u l ab le treatm e nts ap p l i ed .
Conditi on Arter ia l Co ll ecto r Res/Loc Other Tot al
23.7% 32.8% 11 .2% 0.0% 67 .7%
11 /111 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0 % 0.4%
v 1.9% 17.3% 12.8% 0.0% 32.0%
To t al 25.8% 50.2% 24 .0% 0.0% 100.0%
MTC StreetSaver
SS1035
Scenari os Criteria: Fun cti onal Class <> 0 -Other
I Tem pl e City Scenarios -Cost Summary
Interest: 3.00% Inflat ion : 3.00% Printed: 07/05/20 18
Scenario 3: Improve PCI to 65
Preven tative
Year PM Budget Rehabi litation Maintenance Surp lus PM Deferre d Stop Gap
2018 0% $3,400,000 II $751,067 Non-$8,681 $0 $24,588 ,324 Funded $0
Ill $330,615 Project Unmet $26 1,615
IV $2,305 ,838 Project $0
v $0
Total $3,387,520
Project $0
2019 0% $3,400,000 II $103,743 Non-$0 $0 $25,757,731 Funded $0
Ill $211 ,332 Project Unmet $56,651
IV $3,083,032 Projec t $0
v $0
Total $3,398,107
Project $0
2020 0% $3,4 00 ,000 II $59 ,853 Non -$3 ,396 $0 $27,900 ,287 Funded $0
Ill $596,031 Project Unmet $44,806
IV $2,732,933 Project $0
v $0
Total $3,388 ,817
Project $0
2021 0% $3,400,000 II $37,954 Non-$27 ,012 $0 $30 ,196,922 Funded $0
Ill $181 ,303 Project Un met $54 ,481
IV $587,594 Project $0
v $2,558 ,336
Total $3,365,187
Project $0
2022 0% $3,400,000 II $28,410 Non-$84 1 $0 $33,913,253 Funded $0
Ill $290,265 Project Unmet $34,091
IV $213,154 Proj ect $0
v $2,867,337
Total $3,399,166
Project $0
2023 5% $3,400,000 II $106,190 Non-$168,610 $1,390 $33 ,235,706 Funded $0
Ill $515,565 Proj ect Unmet $224 ,270
IV $0 Projec t $0
v $2,605,808
Total $3,227,563
Project $0
Scenarios C riteria: Functional C lass <> 0 -Other MTC StreetSaver
SS1034
Preventative
Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Maintenance
2024 7% $3,400,000 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
2025 8% $3,400,000 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
2026 9% $3,400,000 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
2027 9% $3,400,000 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
Summary
Functional Class
Arterial
Collector
Residential/Local
Grand Total:
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class<> 0 -Other
$93,453 Non-
$199,835 Project
$158,364 Project
$2,693,633
$3,145,285
$0
$178,451 Non-
$755,053 Project
$0 Project
$2,177,995
$3,111,499
$0
$0 Non-
$363,630 Project
$0 Project
$2,708,198
$3,071,828
$0
$65,411 Non-
$174,503 Project
$0 Project
$2,849,951
$3,089,865
$0
Rehabilitation
$8,680,160
$20,702,565
$3,202,112
$32,584,837
2
SS1034
$250,493
$0
$287,550
$0
$327,306
$0
$308,515
$0
Prev. Main!.
$0
$1,252,613
$129,791
$1,382,404
Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap
$0 $32,767,572 Funded $0
Unmet $59,044
$0 $32,331,505 Funded $0
Unmet $43,786
$0 $33,045,122 Funded $0
Unmet $66,527
$0 $31,380,541 Funded $0
Unmet $34,418
Funded Unmet
Stop Gap Stop Gap
$0 $29,085
$0 $560,036
$0 $290,569
$0 $879,690
MTC StreetSaver
Interest: 3% In f lat ion: 3% Printed: 07/05/2018
I Tomp"CUy Scenarios -Network Cond i ti o n Summary
Scenario 3: Improve PCI to 65
Year Budget PM Year Budget PM Year Budget PM
2018 $3,400,000 0% 2022 $3,400,000 0% 2026 $3,400,000 9%
2019 $3,400,000 0% 2023 $3,400,000 5% 2027 $3,400,000 9%
2020 $3,400,000 0% 2024 $3,400,000 7%
2021 $3,400,000 0% 2025 $3,400,000 8%
Projected Network Average PCI by year
Year Never Treated With Selected Treatm en t
Treated Treated
Centerline Miles Lane Miles
2018 59 62 9.24 23.1 1
2019 55 62 6.71 14.82
2020 53 63 7.38 14.76
2021 50 63 6.46 14.40
2022 47 63 4.89 11.08
2023 45 63 11.76 23.51
2024 42 64 11 .89 24.40
2025 40 64 13.54 27.29
2026 37 64 8.89 17.79
2027 35 65 7.28 14.56
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category
Condition in base year 2018, prior to applying t r eatments.
Condition Arter ial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
14.9% 14.3% 4 .1% 0.0% 33.2%
11 /111 3.9% 6.1% 4.2% 0.0% 14.2%
IV 5.2% 18.1% 11 .7% 0.0% 35.0%
v 1.9% 11.7% 4.0% 0 .0% 17.6%
Total 25.8% 50.2% 24.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition in year 2018 after schedulable treatments appl ied.
Condition Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
21.8% 15.9% 5.7% 0.0% 43.5%
11 /11 1 1.6% 4.5% 2.5% 0.0% 8.6%
IV 0.5% 18.1% 11.7% 0.0% 30.3%
v 1.9% 11 .7% 4.0% 0.0% 17.6%
Total 25.8% 50.2% 24.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition in year 2027 a fter schedu l abl e treatments applied.
Condition Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other T otal
25.5% 38.1% 12.4% 0.0% 76.1%
11/111 0.3% 0.1% 0 .0% 0.0% 0.4%
v 0.0% 12.0% 11.6% 0 .0% 23.6%
Total 25.8% 50.2% 24.0% 0 .0% 100.0%
MTC StreetSave r
SS1035
Scenarios Criteria : Functional Class <> 0 -Other
Preventative
Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Maintenance
2024 5% $4,600,000 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
2025 9% $4,600,000 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
2026 10% $4,600,000 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
2027 10% $4,600,000 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
Summary
Functional Class
Arterial
Collector
Residential/Local
''·""'~='~"''~"-~"=---"' ,._.,., '""'"·'·=-'-'~=,~~-
Grand Total:
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class<> 0-Other
$70,596 Non~
$249,521 Project
$158,364 Project
$3,866,196
$4,344,677
$0
$190,922 Non-
$755,053 Project
$0 Project
$3,219,190
$4,165,165
$0
$0 Non-
$363,630 Project
$0 Project
$3,773,610
$4,137,240
$0
$65,411 Non~
$174,503 Project
$0 Project
$3,873,896
$4,113,810
$0
Rehabilitation
$8,643,832
$32,275,634
$3,204,488
-~~~,~~--"·'"'--='"'·
$44,123,954
2
SS1034
$254,128
$0
$434,813
$0
$460,931
$0
$484,659
$0
Prev. Main!.
$0
$1,437,527
$410,702
,848,229
Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap
$0 $21,915,665 Funded $0
Unmet $47,605
$0 $19,850,855 Funded $0
Unmet $28,972
$0 $19,169,632 Funded $0
Unmet $55,206
$0 $15,766,088 Funded $0
Unmet $18,561
Funded Unmet
Stop Gap Stop Gap
$0 $22,600
$0 $412,208
$0 $283,780
'"'~==·-~--~"='---~·'-"·'·''"'
$0 $718,589
MTC StreetSaver
I Temple City Scen a r ios -Co st Summary
Interest : 3.00% Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 07/05/2018
Scenario 5: Improve PC I to 80
P r eventative
Year PM B udget Rehabi l itation Maintenance Surplus PM Deferr ed Stop Gap
2018 0% $5,200,000 II $751,067 Non-$7 ,52 4 $0 $22,784,789 Funded $0
Ill $437,602 Project Unmet $247,917
IV $4,003,546 Projec t $0
v $0
Tot al $5,192,215
Project $0
2019 0% $5,200,000 II $103,743 Non-$1 '191 $0 $23,833,808 Funded $0
Ill $409,0 14 Project Un met $56,505
IV $4,682,786 Project $0
v $0
Total $5,195,543
Project $0
2 020 0% $5,200,000 II $59,853 Non -$404 $0 $24,113,146 Funded $0
Ill $454,939 Project Unmet $34 ,982
IV $1 ,41 2,009 Project $0
v $3,270,504
Total $5,197,305
Project $0
2021 0% $5,200,000 II $37,954 Non -$30,094 $0 $24,491,575 Funded $0
Ill $0 Project Unmet $54,481
IV $233 ,6 73 Project $0
v $4,895 ,073
Total $5,166,700
Project $0
2022 0% $5,200,000 II $28,410 Non-$16,3 11 $0 $23,419,096 Funded $0
Il l $290,265 Proj ec t Unmet $34,091
IV $213,154 Project $0
v $4,651,446
Total $5,183,275
Project $0
2023 3% $5,200,000 II $94,434 No n- $168,881 $0 $20,008,103 Funded $0
Il l $298,624 Project Unmet $105,145
IV $0 Pr oject $0
v $4,630,990
Total $5,024,048
Project $0
Scenarios C riteria: Functional Cl ass <> 0 -Other MTC StreetSaver
SS1034
Preventative
Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Maintenance
2024 4% $5,200,000 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
2025 8% $5,200,000 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
2026 8% $5,200,000 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
2027 8% $5,200,000 II
Ill
IV
v
Total
Project
Summary
Functional Class
Arterial
Collector
Residential/Local
Grand Total:
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class <> 0 -Other
$70,596 Non~
$249,521 Project
$158,364 Project
$4,513,303
$4,991,784
$0
$190,922 Non-
$755,053 Project
$0 Project
$3,825,261
$4,771,236
$0
$0 Non-
$363,630 Project
$0 Project
$4,397,143
$4,760,773
$0
$156,004 Non-
$174,503 Project
$0 Project
$4,436,979
$4,767,486
$0
Rehabilitation
$8,577,666
$32,138,025
$9,534,674
$50,250,365
2
SS1034
$206,205
$0
$428,704
$0
$439,067
$0
$431,121
$0
Prev. Maint.
$0
$1,492,283
$237,219
$1,729,502
Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap
$1,795 $17,418,737 Funded $0
Unmet $42,017
$0 $14,712,360 Funded $0
Unmet $20,364
$0 $11,895,787 Funded $0
Unmet $27,040
$0 $7,613,795 Funded $0
Unmet $8,125
Funded Unmet
Stop Gap Stop Gap
$0 $22,600
$0 $361,339
$0 $246,727
$0 $630,666
MTC StreetSaver
Interest: 3% Infl at io n: 3% Prin ted: 07/05/20 18
~~ Templo Cny Scenarios-Network Condition Summary
Scenario 5: Improve PCI to 80
Year Budget PM Year Budget PM Year Budget PM
2018 $5,200,000 0% 2022 $5,200,000 0% 2026 $5,200,000 8%
2019 $5 ,2 00 ,00 0 0% 2023 $5,200,000 3% 2027 $5,200,000 8%
2020 $5,200,000 0% 2024 $5,200,000 4%
2021 $5,200 ,0 00 0% 2025 $5,200 ,000 8%
Projected Network Average PCI by year
Year Never Treated With Sel ected Treatment
Treated Tr eated
Cente rline Miles L ane Miles
2018 59 65 12.76 30.1 5
2019 55 67 10.22 21.84
2020 53 67 6.00 13.95
2021 50 69 7.85 15.7 1
2022 47 70 8.62 18.07
2023 45 72 14.49 28.98
2024 42 74 16.26 32 .53
2025 40 76 13 .65 28.13
2026 37 78 10.34 20.68
2027 35 80 11 .09 22.19
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category
Condition in base year 2018 , prior to app l ying treatments.
Condition Arterial Collector Re s/Loc Other T otal
I 14.9% 14.3% 4 .1% 0.0% 33.2%
11/111 3.9% 6.1% 4 .2% 0.0% 14.2%
IV 5.2% 18.1% 11 .7% 0 .0 % 35.0%
v 1.9 % 11.7% 4 .0% 0.0% 17 .6%
Total 25.8% 50.2% 24 .0% 0 .0 % 100.0%
Condition in year 2018 after schedu l able treatments applied .
Condition Arterial Co llector Res/Loc Other Tot al
I 2 1.8% 19.0% 7 .2% 0 .0% 4 8.0%
11/11 1 1.6% 4.2% 2.5% 0.0% 8.3%
IV 0 .5% 15.3% 10.3% 0.0% 26.1 %
v 1.9% 11 .7% 4 .0% 0.0% 17.6%
Total 25.8% 50.2% 24.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition in year 2027 after schedulable treatments app l ied.
Condition Arterial Collecto r Res/L oc Other Tota l
I 25.5% 50.1% 18.3% 0.0% 94.0%
11 /111 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0 .0% 0.4%
v 0.0% 0.0% 5.6% 0.0% 5 .6%
Total 25.8% 50.2% 24.0% 0.0% 100.0%
MTC StreetS ave r
SS1035
Scena rios Criteria: Functional Class <> 0 -Other
f !NCE Collaboration . Commitment. Confidence ~
Appendix G
Sections Selected for Treatment
and GIS Maps
Under Scenario 1 City's Budget
E11g i1J ce rm g & Env ironm cnt dl Ser v1ccs www. nee net. com
Sections Selected for Treatment
The purpose of this list is to provide the City with potential candidates for treatment
based on each section's functional classification, PCI, treatment history, and
available funding. It is to serve as a general guide for potential street ma i ntenance
treatments and engineering judgment and project level analysis should be applied
to ensure that the selected treatment is appropriate and cost effective.
The street section listed as part of the "Treatment from Project Selection " is
Rosemead Boulevard and it is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2018. Si nce
the budget comes from FY 2017/18 funding, it has no impact on the available
budget for each scenario and their construction costs are listed as $0.
~!NCE
~~ T•mploCity
Year: 2018
Year
2018
2019
2020
2021
Budget
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
PM
0%
0%
0%
0%
Year
2022
2023
2024
2025
Budget
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
PM
2%
10%
14%
15%
Scenarios-Sections Selected for Treatment
Interest: 3.00%
Year
2026
2027
Inflation: 3.00%
Budget
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
PM
15%
8%
Treatment
Printed: 09/28/2018
Scenario: City's Budget
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID Length Width Area FC Surf Current PCI PCI Cost Rating Treatment
ALESSANDRO AVENUE
LEMON AVENUE
NOEL DRIVE
ROWLAND AVENUE
TRELAWNEY AVENUE
KAUFFMAN AVENUE
LEMON AVENUE
LIVIA AVENUE
PRIMROSE AVENUE
BIDWELL STREET
ESTRELLA AVENUE
FLAHERTY STREET
PARMERTON AVENUE
GARIBALDI
AVENUE
NCL
NORTH END
WEN DON
AVENUE
LEMON
AVENUE
LONGDEN
AVENUE
LAS TUNAS
DRIVE
LONGDEN
AVENUE
BROADWAY
FlAHERTY
STREET
SOUTH END
GARIBALDI
AVENUE
TEMPLE CITY EAST CITY
BOULEVARD LIMIT
WOOLLEY
STREET
FLAHERTY
STREET
LONGDEN
AVENUE
GARIBALDI
AVENUE
LOMA AVENUE ENCINITA
AVENUE
EAST CITY
LIMIT
ALESSAN 006
ORO
LEMON 210
NOEL 260
ROWLAND 343
TRELAWN 375
EY
KAUFFMA 178
N
LEMON 213
LIVIA 221
PRIMROS 293
E
BIDWELL 030
ESTRELLA 107 SALTER
AVENUE
CLOVERLY
AVENUE
PRIMROSE FLAHERTY 117
AVENUE
DANESWOOD DAINES DRIVE PARMERT 281
DRIVE ON
u-Treatment from Project Selection
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class<> 0-Other
1,270
135
1,848
366
878
1,278
1,944
480
426
347
377
582
487
Type PCI Before After
36 45,720 R AC/AC 63 64 74
26 3,510 R AC/AC 59 60 70
36 62,832 R AC/AC 65 66 75
30 10,304 R ACIAC 61 62 72
36 33,730 R AC/AC 66 67 76
Treatment Total
32 40,896 C ACIAC 59 61 71
32 62,208 C ACIAC 67 69 78
36 17,280 C AC/AC 60 62 72
32 13,632 C AC/AC 60 62 72
Treatment Total
32 11,104 R AC/AC 59 60 100
28 10,556 R AC/AC 61 62 100
30 17,460 R AC/AC 64 65 100
30 14,610 R AC/AC 64 65 100
SS1026
$22,860
$1,755
$31,416
$5,152
$16,865
$78,048
24,364 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL {3% DIGOUTS)
28,930 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL {3% DIGOUTS)
24,641 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL (3% OIGOUTS)
30,076 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL (3% OIGOUTS)
24,776 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL (3% OIGOUTS)
$21,812 26,135 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL (2% DIGOUTS)
$33,178 28,390 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL {2% DIGOUTS)
$9,216 26,416 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL (2% DIGOUTS)
$7,271 26,421 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL (2% OIGOUTS)
$71,477
$19,432 22,704 2" MILL AND OVERLAY
$18,473 21,618 2"MILLANDOVERLAY
$30,555 21,196 2"MILLAND OVERLAY
$25,568 21,221 2" MILL AND OVERLAY
MTC StreetSaver
I Temple City Scenarios-Sections Selected for Treatment
Interest: 3.00% Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 09128/2018
Scenario: Budget
Year: 2018
Treatment
Street Name Begin Location End Location StreetiD Section 10 length Width Area FC Surf Current PCI PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Type PCI Before After
SAINT JAMES DRIVE cos GARIBALDI SAINT JAM 349 173 30 8,553 R AC/AC 67 66 100 $14,968 19,590 2" MILL AND OVERLAY
AVENUE ES
SPARKLETT STREET TEMPLE CITY CAMELLIA SPARKLET 356 367 28 10,276 R AC/AC 67 66 100 $17,983 19,588 2" MILL AND OVERLAY
BOULEVARD AVENUE T
Treatment Total $126,979
ENCINITA AVENUE WOODRUFF LAS TUNAS ENCINITA 102 627 36 22,572 c AC/AC 73 74 82 $7,524 46,154 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE DRIVE SEAL
ENCINITAAVENUE EATON WASH SPRR {SOUTH ENCINITA 106 1,467 36 52,812 c ACfAC 74 75 83 $17,604 45,993 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
CITY LIMIT) SEAL
FAIRVIEW AVENUE WEST END McCLINTOCK FAIRVIEW 111 136 26 3,588 R ACIAC 79 80 87 $1,157 35,803 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE SEAL
Treatment Total $26,285
LIVE OAK AVENUE TEMPLE CITY BALDWIN LIVE OAK 216 2,582 34 87,788 A AC/AC 49 51 100 $312,136 21,433 2" MILL ANO OVERLAY (15%
BOULEVARD AVENUE DIGOUTS)
Treatment Total $312,136
LEMON AVENUE ENCINITA OAK AVENUE LEMON 211 252 32 8,064 c AC/AC 43 45 100 $24,192 19,012 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (10%
AVENUE OIGOUTS)
LOMAAVENUE HERMOSA LAS TUNAS LOMA 225 292 26 7,592 c AC/AC 43 45 100 $22,776 19,006 2" MILL AND OVERLAY {10%
DRIVE DRIVE DIGOUTS)
WORKMAN AVENUE ALLEY E/0 CAMELLIA WORKMA 407 155 36 5,580 c AC/AC 43 45 100 $16,740 19,003 2" MILL AND OVERLAY {10%
TEMPLE CITY AVENUE N DIGOUTS)
BOULEVARD
Treatment Total $63,708
GOLDEN \'VEST AVENUE LONGDEN GARIBALDI GOLDENW 138 1,281 36 46,116 c AC/AC 56 60 100 $106,323 20,826 2" MILL AND OVERLAY {5%
AVENUE AVENUE EST DIGOUTS)
LAS TUNAS DRIVE MUSCATEL ROSEMEAD LASTUNAS 204 1,045 101 105,050 A AC/AC 65 67 100 $259,707 23,507 2" MILL AND OVERLAY {5%
AVENUE BOULEVARD DIGOUTS)
LAS TUNAS DRIVE ROSEMEAD SULTANA LASTUNAS 205 565 100 58,710 A ACIAC 65 67 100 $145,145 23,507 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
BOULEVARD AVENUE DIGOUTS)
LIVE OAK AVENUE ENCINITA TEMPLE CITY LIVE OAK 215 2,340 34 79,560 A ACIAC 69 70 100 $196,690 21,422 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
AVENUE BOULEVARD DIGOUTS)
Treatment Total $707,865
.. ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD CALLITA AROENDALE ROSEMEA 314 711 38 27,018 A AC/AC 64 66 92 $0 35,900 MICROSURFACING
NB STREET DNB
-.-,-~~---~-,-----~~"-~---~~~-~-~ -------------""'"'---~ .. -----~""'~'' '"'"A'~--~--~·~~-~v~~-----------------"-----.. ~"""'~~--~·~--~-----
-----"'" _____ ,_
----~~-"-""'~-----"'~---~--~"~-~~-~-,~
••-Treatment from Project Selection 2 MTC StreetSaver
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class<> 0-Other SS1026
Temple City
Year: 2018
Scenarios-Sections Selected for Treatment
Interest: 3.00%
Treatment
Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 09/28/2018
Budget
Street Name Begin location End location Street ID Section 10 Length Width Area FC Surf Current PCI PC! Cost Rating Treatment
''ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD EMPEROR
NB AVENUE
.. ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD LONGDEN
NB AVENUE
.,ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD GARIBALDI
NB AVENUE
"ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD HERMOSA
NB DRIVE
CALUTA
STREET
ROSEMEA 315
DNB
EMPEROR ROSEMEA 316
AVENUE DNB
LONGDEN ROSEMEA 317
AVENUE DNB
GARIBALDI ROSEMEA 318
AVENUE DNB
"ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD ELM AVENUE HERMOSA ROSEMEA 319
DNB NB DRIVE
''ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD LAS TUNAS
NB DRIVE
ELM AVENUE ROSEMEA 320
DNB
"ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD BROADWAY LAS TUNAS ROSEMEA 321
NB DRIVE DNB
"ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD RANCHO REAL BROADWAY ROSEMEA 322
NB ROAD DNB
"ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD OLIVE STREET RANCHO ROSEMEA 323
NB REAL ROAD DNB
"ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD SERENO DRIVE OLIVE ROSEMEA 324
DNB NB STREET
''ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD PENTLAND
NB STREET
SERENO
DRIVE
ROSEMEA 325
DNB
"ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD END OF AC PENTLAND ROSEMEA 326
NB PAVEMENT STREET DNB
"ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD NORTH CITY CALLITA ROSEMEA 328
SB LIMIT STREET DSB
"ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD CALLITA
SB STREET
.. ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD EMPEROR
SB AVENUE
"ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD LONGDEN
SB AVENUE
''ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD GARIBALDI
SB AVENUE
''ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD HERMOSA
SB DRIVE
•• -Treatment from Project Selection
EMPEROR
AVENUE
ROSEMEA 329
DSB
LONGDEN ROSEMEA 330
AVENUE DSB
GARIBALDI ROSEMEA 331
AVENUE DSB
HERMOSA
DRIVE
ROSEMEA 332
DSB
ELM AVENUE ROSEMEA 333
DSB
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class <> 0 -Other
416
1,234
1,538
1,096
492
464
1,635
403
198
653
792
108
170
429
1,228
1,538
1,096
489
Type PC! Before After
28 11,648 A AC/AC
30 37,020 A AC/AC
30 46,140 A AC/AC
30 32,880 A AC/AC
34 16,728 A AC/AC
30 13,920 A AC/AC
30 49,050 A AC/AC
35 14,105 A AC/AC
34 6,732 A AC/AC
28 18,284 A AC/AC
32 25,344 A AC/AC
30 3,240 A AC/AC
38 6,460 A AC/AC
28 12,012 A AC/AC
32 39,296 A AC/AC
30 46,140 A AC/AC
30 32,880 A AC/AC
34 16,626 A AC/AC
3
SS1026
94
94
87
83
79
78
86
79
79
88
85
63
80
91
84
82
85
85
100 100
100 100
89 94
85 91
81 89
80 88
88 93
81 89
81 89
89 95
B7 93
85 91
82 89
92 96
86 92
84 91
87 93
87 93
$0 0 MICROSURFACING
$0 0 MICROSURFACING
$0 36,942 MICROSURFACING
$0 35,374 MICROSURFACING
$0 33,080 MICROSURFACING
$0 32,511 MICROSURFACING
$0 36,530 MICROSURFACING
$0 33,080 MICROSURFACING
$0 33,080 MICROSURFACING
$0 37,174 MICROSURFACING
$0 36,296 MICROSURFACING
$0 35,374 MICROSURFACING
$0 33,661 MICROSURFACING
$0 37,471 MICROSURFACING
$0 35,900 MICROSURFACING
$0 34,818 MICROSURFACING
$0 36,296 MICROSURFACING
$0 36,296 MICROSURFACING
MTC StreetSaver
I Temple City Scenarios-Sections Selected for Treatment
Interest: 3.00% Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 09/28!2018
Scenario: Budget
Year: 2018
Treatment
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Sectlon 10 Length Width Area FC Surf Current PCI PCI Cost Rating Treatment
.. ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD ELM AVENUE LAS TUNAS ROSEMEA 334
SB DRIVE DSB
.. ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD LAS TUNAS
SB DRIVE
BROADWAY ROSEMEA 335
DSB
.. ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD BROADWAY RANCHO ROSEMEA 336
SB REAL ROAD DSB
"ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD RANCHO REAL OLIVE ROSEMEA 337
DSB SB ROAD STREET
.. ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD OLIVE STREET SERENO ROSEMEA 338
SB DRIVE DSB
.. ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD SERENO DRIVE PENTLAND ROSEMEA 339
SB STREET OSB
~•ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD PENTLAND END OF AC ROSEMEA 340
SB STREET PAVEMENT DSB
473
1,627
403
198
653
792
108
Type PC! Before After
40 18,920 A AC/AC 90 91 96 $0 37,351 MICROSURFACING
28 45,556 A ACfAC 84 86 92 $0 35,900 MICROSURFACING
35 14,105 A ACfAC 77 79 86 $0 60,691 MICROSURFACING
32 6,336 A ACfAC 75 77 85 $0 62,873 MICROSURFACING
28 18,284 A ACfAC 77 79 86 $0 60,691 MICROSURFACING
28 22,176 A AC!AC 88 89 95 $0 37,174 MICROSURFACING
30 3,240 A AC!AC 77 79 86 $0 60,691 MICROSURFACING
Treatment Total $0
Year 2018 Area Total 1,424,243 Year 2018 Total $1,386,498
Year: 2019
Trealmenl
street Name Begin location End Location Stree\10 Section ID Length VIJidlh Area FC Surf Current PCI PCI
CLOVERLY AVENUE
FLAHERTY STREET
HALDEMAN STREET
LEMON AVENUE
MILLER DRIVE
WENDON STREET
WORTHINGTON DRIVE
WEN DON
STREET
FLAHERTY
STREET
GOLDEN WEST ROWLAND
AVENUE AVENUE
BURTON
AVENUE
NCL
CDS
LONGDEN
AVENUE
LOWER AZUSA SOUTH END
ROAD
GOLDEN WEST ROWLAND
AVENUE AVENUE
BURTON COS
AVENUE
** -Treatment from Project Selection
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class<> 0-Other
CLOVERLY 059
FLAHERTY 118
HALDEMA 149
N
LEMON 210
MILLER 247
WENDON 386
WORTHIN 413
GTO
320
93{)
238
135
143
935
176
28 8,960
28 26,040
32 7,358
26 3,510
36 5,148
34 26,180
24 5,994
4
SS1026
Type PCI Before After
R AC/AC 69 68 78
R AC/AC 70 69 78
R AC/AC 69 68 77
R ACIAC 59 69 78
R ACIAC 69 68 78
R AC!AC 69 68 78
R ACIAC 69 68 77
Cost Rating Treatment
$4,615
$13,411
$3,790
$1,808
$2,652
$13,483
$3,087
24,215 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL (3% DIGOUTS)
24,310 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL (3% DIGOUTS)
24,209 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL (3% DIGOUTS)
32,259 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL (3% DIGOUTS)
24,218 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL (3% DIGOUTS)
24,218 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL (3% DIGOUTS)
24,209 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL (3% D!GOUTS)
MTC S\reetSaver
I Temple City Scenarios-Sections Selected for Treatment
Interest: 3.00% Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 09/28/2018
Scenario: City's Budget
Treatment Total $42,846
CAMINO REAL OAK AVENUE TEMPLE CITY CAMINO 058 1,267 34 43,078 c AC/AC 69 68 77 $23,665 27,356 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
BOULEVARD SEAL (2% DIGOUTS)
DAINES DRIVE CDS TEMPLE CITY DAINES 073 193 3 7,451 c AC/AC 66 68 77 $4,094 27,352 SLURRY SEAl AND CRACK
BOULEVARD SEAL (2% DIGOUTS)
PRIMROSE AVENUE LONGDEN FLAHERTY PRIMROS 292 882 28 24,696 c AC!AC 69 68 77 $13,567 27,360 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE STREET E SEAL {2% DIGOUTS)
VAL STREET BARELA GOLDEN VALSTREE 377 758 28 21,224 c AC/AC 69 66 77 $11,660 27,360 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE WEST T SEAL {2% DIGOUTS)
AVENUE
WORKMAN AVENUE AGNES ROWLAND WORKMA 411 400 36 14,400 c AC/AC 69 66 77 $7,911 27,359 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE AVENUE N SEAL (2% DIGOUTS)
Treatment Total $60,897
LAS TUNAS DRIVE ENCINITA 190Wf0 LASTUNAS 207 2,015 66 132,990 A ACIAC 51 50 100 $487,039 20,923 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (15%
AVENUE TEMPLE CITY DIGOUTS)
BOULEVARD
LOWER AZUSA ROAD 190Ef0 190Wf0 LOWERAZ 237 2,228 59 131,080 A ACIAC 54 54 100 $480,045 20,273 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (15%
TEMPLE CITY BALDWIN USA DIGOUTS)
BOULEVARD AVENUE
Treatment Total $967,084
DAINES DRIVE McCULLOCH WE LLANO DAINES 079 557 32 17,824 c AC/AC 46 45 100 $55.077 18,424 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (10%
AVENUE AVENUE DIGOUTS)
Treatment Total $55,077
OAK AVENUE LONGDEN GARIBALDI OAK 263 1,289 36 46,404 c ACIAC 63 63 100 $110,197 19,047 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
AVENUE AVENUE OIGOUTS)
PAL MALL AVENUE LIVE OAK DAINES DRIVE PALMALL 276 1,319 32 42,208 c AC/AC 62 62 100 $100,233 19,483 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
AVENUE DIGOUTS)
WEDGEWOOD STREET ENCINITA ALESSANDRO WEDGEW 379 700 32 22,400 R AC!AC 40 40 100 $62,167 18,257 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
AVENUE AVENUE OOD DIGOUTS)
Treatment Total $272,597
Year 2019 Area Total 586,945 Year 2019 Total $1,398,501
Year: 2020
Treatment
Street Name Begin Location End Locallon Street ID Section ID Length Width Area FC Surf Current PCI PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Type PCI Before After
ACASO DRIVE SULTANA SERENO ACASO 001 568 32 16,176 R AC/AC 71 69 78 $9,642 23,573 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE DRIVE SEAL (3% DIGOUTS)
u-Treatment from Project Selection 5 MTC StreetSaver
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class<> 0-Other 551026
I Temple City Scenarios-Sections Selected for Treatment
Interest: 3.00% Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 09/28/2018
Scenario: City's
ALESSANDRO AVENUE PENTLAND LAROSA ALESSAN 415 529 32 16,928 c ACIAC 72 69 78 $9,579 26,873 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
STREET DRIVE ORO SEAL (2% DIGOUTS)
KAUFFMAN AVENUE LONGDEN GARIBALDI KAUFFMA 178 1,278 32 40,896 c AC/AC 59 66 77 $23,140 26,520 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE AVENUE N SEAL (2% DIGOUTS)
LIVIA AVENUE WOOLLEY LONGDEN LIVIA 221 460 36 17,280 c AC/AC 60 69 76 $9,776 26,680 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
STREET AVENUE SEAL (2% DIGOUTS)
PRIMROSE AVENUE FLAHERTY GARIBALDI PRIMROS 293 426 32 13,632 c AC!AC 60 69 76 $7,714 26,687 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
STREET AVENUE E SEAL (2% DIGOUTS)
Treatment Total $50,211
BLACKLEY STREET PARMERTON McCULLOCH BLACKLEY 036 233 26 6,058 R ACIAC 71 69 100 $11,248 17,929 2" MILL AND OVERLAY
AVENUE AVENUE
Treatment Total $11,248
WORKMAN AVENUE TEMPLE CITY ALLEY EIO WORKMA 406 235 36 8,460 c ACIAC 92 69 94 $2,992 16,351 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
BOULEVARD TEMPLE CITY N SEAL
BOULEVARD
Treatment Total $2,992
LOWER AZUSA ROAD WEST CITY 190Wf0 LOWERAZ 235 2,510 60 150,600 A ACIAC 56 53 100 $568,077 19,766 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (15%
LIMIT TEMPLE CITY USA DIGOUTS)
BOULEVARD
Treatment Total $568,077
DAINES DRIVE WELL AND SANTA ANITA DAINES 060 648 32 20,736 c ACIAC 46 45 100 $65,997 17,972 2" MILL AND OVERLAY {10%
AVENUE AVENUE DIGOUTS)
MUSCATEL AVENUE GARIBALDI LAS TUNAS MUSCATE 253 2,090 36 75,240 c ACIAC 46 45 100 $239,467 17,965 2" MILL AND OVERLAY {10%
AVENUE DRIVE L DIGOUTS)
Treatment Total $305,464
DAINES DRIVE BALDWIN HALIFAX DAINES 078 2,571 32 82,272 c AC!AC 66 64 100 $201,235 18,029 2" MILL AND OVERLAY {5%
AVENUE ROAD DIGOUTS}
ENCINITAAVENUE LAS TUNAS LIVE OAK ENCINITA 103 1,316 36 47,376 c ACIAC 66 64 100 $115,880 18,018 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
DRIVE AVENUE DIGOUTS)
FLAHERTY STREET ENCINITA CDS FLAHERTY 116 314 24 9,197 R ACIAC 42 40 100 $26,290 17,724 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
AVENUE DIGOUTS)
HERMOSA DRIVE BURTON MUSCATEL HERMOSA 167 1,183 36 42,588 c ACIAC 65 63 100 $104,169 18,459 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
AVENUE AVENUE DIGOUTS)
Treatment Total $447,574
DALEVIEWAVENUE FREER STREET GRAND DALEVIEW 081 1,212 38 47,328 c ACIAC 73 70 73 $229 890,706 SEAL CRACKS
AVENUE
·-~,-·--~-~~-~~-... ~-·-"""--··~-~---------·---~--·--~-.. -~ ... --~·-""" ------,~-~~~--~·-·---·-~ ------,.•w·-·-·--·-~-·---·~""""~"
*" ~ Treatment from Project Selection 6 MTC Slree\Saver
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class<> 0 -Other SS1026
I Temple City Scenarios-Sections Selected for Treatment
Interest: 3.00% Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 09/28/2018
Scenario: City's Budget
Year: 2020
Treatment
Street Name Begin Location End Location S\ree\10 Section 10 Length Width Area FC Surf Current PCI PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Type PCI Before After
PENTLAND STREET ENCINITA ALESSANDRO PENTLAN 284 1,126 34 38,284 R AC/AC 75 73 75 $175 763,890 SEAL CRACKS
AVENUE AVENUE D
Treatment Total $404
Year 2021 Area Total 635,051 Year 2021 Total $1,395,612
Year: 2021
Treatment
Street Name Begin Location End Location Stree\ID Section ID length Width Area FC Surf Current PCI PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Type PCI Before After
ALESSANDRO AVENUE GARIBALDI LAS TUNAS ALESSAN 006 1,270 36 45,720 R AC/AC 63 69 78 $24,980 22,912 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE DRIVE ORO SEAL (3% DIGOUTS)
CRAIGLEE STREET TEMPLE CITY BARELA CRAIGLEE 069 480 28 13,440 R AC/AC 73 69 78 $7,344 . 22,916 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
BOULEVARD AVENUE SEAL (3% DIGOUTS)
ROWLAND AVENUE WEND ON FLAHERTY ROWLAND 343 368 30 10,304 R AC/AC 61 69 76 $5,630 30,637 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE STREET SEAL (3% DIGOUTS}
Treatment Total $37,954
LOWER AZUSA ROAD 190 E/0 EAST CITY LOWERAZ 239 3,700 60 222,000 A AC/AC 56 53 100 $862,526 19,253 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (15%
BALDWIN LIMIT USA DIGOUTS)
AVENUE
Treatment Total $862,526
LA ROSA DRIVE FRATUS DRIVE ALESSANDRO LAROSA 191 926 32 29,632 c AC/AC 52 46 100 $97,140 17,239 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (10%
AVENUE DIGOUTS)
PAL MALL AVENUE KEY WEST LOWER PALMALL 260 1,196 32 38,272 c AC/AC 51 45 100 $125,463 17,383 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (10%
STREET AZUSA ROAD DIGOUTS)
Treatment Total $222,603
CLOVERLY AVENUE BROADWAY OLIVE CLOVERLY 064 907 36 32,652 c AC/AC 66 63 100 $82,262 17,864 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
STREET D!GOUTS)
ENCINITAAVENUE LIVE OAK BROADWAY ENCIN!TA 104 975 36 35,100 c AC/AC 67 63 100 $88,429 17,881 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
AVENUE DIGOUTS)
HERMOSA DRIVE MUSCATEL ROSEMEAD HERMOSA 168 1,042 40 41,680 c AC/AC 67 63 100 $105,007 17,866 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
AVENUE BOULEVARD DIGOUTS)
Treatment Total $275,698
u-Treatment from Project Selection 7 MTC StreetSaver
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class <> 0 -Other SS1026
~~ TempleCHy
Year: 2022
Scenarios-Sections Selected for Treatment
Interest: 3.00%
Treatment
Inflation; 3.00% Printed: 09/28/2018
Scenario; City's Budget
Street Name Begin Location End Location Stree\10 Section ID Length Width Area FC Surf Current PCI PCI Cost Rating Treatment
ELLIS LANE
HART AVENUE
LEMON AVENUE
MUSCATEL AVENUE
SULTANA AVENUE
SULTANA AVENUE
VAL STREET
WORKMAN AVENUE
ARROWOOD STREET
CLOVERLY AVENUE
CLOVERLY AVENUE
DANBURY STREET
LONGDEN AVENUE
MYDAAVENUE
RANCHO REAL RQAD
ROCCUS LANE
RYLAND AVENUE
TEMPLE CITY 130 S/0 ELLIS 092
BOULEVARD LOWER
AZUSA ROAD
HERMOSA LAS TUNAS HART 163
DRIVE DRIVE
OAKAVENUE TEMPLECITY LEMON 212
LAS TUNAS
DRIVE
HERMOSA
DRIVE
LAS TUNAS
DRIVE
BOULEVARD
SOUTH CITY MUSCATE 254
LIMIT L
LAS TUNAS SULTANA 363
DRIVE
BROADWAY SULTANA 364
GOLDEN WEST EAST CITY VALSTREE 378
AVENUE LIMIT T
ROWLAND
AVENUE
CDS
LIVE OAK
AVENUE
CITY LIMIT WORKMA 412
N
DALEVIEW ARROWO 019
AVENUE OD
BROADWAY CLOVERLY 063
LOWER AZUSA GIDLEY
ROAD STREET
CLOVERLY 068
CDS
MUSCATEL
AVENUE
HERMOSA
DRIVE
SULTANA
AVENUE
BURTON
AVENUE
SANTA ANITA DANBURY 084
AVENUE
ROSEMEAD LONGDEN 229
BOULEVARD
CDS MYDA 255
LOMA AVENUERANCHOR 297
EAL
CDS ROCCUS 309
LA ROSA DRIVE LOWER RYLAND 348
AZUSA ROAD
•• -Treatment from Project Selection
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class <> 0 Other
1,000
502
1,265
200
658
1,840
669
224
288
916
448
195
1,083
414
707
206
1,542
Type PCI Before After
36 36,000 C AC/AC
26 13,052 C AC!AC
36 40,480 C AC/AC
36 7,200 C AC!AC
26 17,108 C AC!AC
36 66,240 C AC!AC
28 18,732 C AC!AC
36 8,064 C AC!AC
24 9,201 R AC/AC
36 32,976 c AC/AC
34 15,232 R AC/AC
24 6,412 R AC/AC
36 38,988 c AC/AC
27 12,726 R AC/AC
36 25,452 R AC/AC
26 7,530 R AC/AC
36 55,512 R AC!AC
9
SS1026
55 47
54 46
54 46
56 48
53 45
56 48
55 47
54 46
Treatment Total
47 41
72 66
50 43
50
70 63
49 42
46 40
46 40
47 40
100 $121,555 16,637 2" MILL AND OVERLAY {10%
DIGOUTS)
100 $44,071 16,781 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (10%
DIGOUTS)
100 $136,682 16,789 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (10%
OIGOUTS)
100 $24,311 16,474 2"MILLANDOVERLAY(10%
D!GOUTS)
100 $57,765 16,932 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (10%
DIGOUTS)
100 $223,662 16,483 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (10%
DIGOUTS)
100 $63,250 16,642 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (10%
DIGOUTS)
100 $27,229 16,781 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (10%
DIGOUTS)
$698,526
100 $27,904 16,577 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
DIGOUTS)
100 $85,571 16,341 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
DIGOUTS)
100 $46,193 16,325 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
DIGOUTS)
100 $19,446 16,332 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
DIGOUTS)
100 $101,171 17,278 2"MILLANDOVERLAY(5%
DIGOUTS)
100 $38,594 16,455 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
DIGOUTS)
100 $77,187 16,679 2"MILLANDOVERLAY(5%
DIGOUTS)
100 $22,836 16,681 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
DIGOUTS)
100 $168,347 16,677 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
DIGOUTS)
MTC StreetSaver
I Temple City Scenarios-Sections Selected for Treatment
Interest: 3.00% Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 09/28/2018
Scenario: City's Budget
Year: 2022
Treatment
Street Name Begin location End Location Street ID Section 10 Length Width Area FC Surf current PCI PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Type PCI Before After
McCLINTOCK AVENUE GRANO FAIRVIEW McCLINTO 244 780 26 20,280 R AC/AC 75 70 73 $105 700,996 SEAL CRACKS
AVENUE AVENUE CK
OLIVE STREET TEMPLE CITY BALDWIN OLIVE 273 2,575 36 92,700 c AC/AC 78 72 75 $458 859,133 SEAL CRACKS
BOULEVARD AVENUE
PARMERTON AVENUE DAINES DRIVE BlACKLEY PARMERT 282 912 26 23,712 R AC!AC 76 71 74 $121 705,897 SEAL CRACKS
STREET ON
PERSIMMON AVENUE NORTH CITY DAINES DRIVE PERSIMM 287 1,147 28 34,410 c AC/AC 81 75 77 $154 894,784 SEAL CRACKS
LIMIT ON
RENO AVENUE LONGDEN GARIBALDI RENO 300 1,494 26 38,844 c AC/AC 92 85 86 $69 1,272, SEAL CRACKS
AVENUE AVENUE 350
RENO AVENUE GARIBALDI HERMOSA RENO 301 1,064 26 27,664 c AC/AC 91 84 86 $52 1,251, SEAL CRACKS
AVENUE DRIVE 637
RENO AVENUE HERMOSA ELM AVENUE RENO 302 482 26 12,532 c AC/AC 92 85 86 $22 1,284, SEAL CRACKS
DRIVE 174
VAL STREET TEMPLE CITY BARELA VALSTREE 376 483 28 13,524 c AC/AC 78 72 75 $67 860,323 SEAL CRACKS
BOULEVARD AVENUE T
Treatment Total $3,070
Year 2022 Area Total 1,417,445 Year 2022 Total $1,394,027
Year: 2023
Treatment
Street Name Begin Location End location Street ID SectlontD length Width Area FC Surf Current PCI PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Type PCI Before After
NOEL DRIVE NORTH END BROADWAY NOEL 260 1,848 36 62,832 R AC/AC 65 68 77 $36,420 21,476 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL {3% OIGOUTS)
TRELAWNEY AVENUE LEMON SOUTH END TRELAWN 375 878 36 33,730 R AC/AC 66 69 78 $19,552 21,580 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE EY SEAL {3% DIGOUTS)
Treatment Total $55,972
LEMON AVENUE TEMPLE CITY EAST CITY LEMON 213 1,944 32 62,208 c AC/AC 67 69 79 $38,462 24,610 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
BOULEVARD LIMIT SEAL (2% DIGOUTS)
Treatment Total $38,462
ARDEN DRIVE OLIVE STREET LA ROSA ARDEN 012 1,511 36 54,396 c AC/AC 90 85 92 $21,020 39,035 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
DRIVE SEAL
.. ~Treatment from Project Selection 11 MTC SlreetSaver
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class<> 0-Other SS1026
I Tomplo c;ty Scenarios-Sections Selected for Treatment
Interest: 3.00% Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 09/28/2018
Scenario: City's ------~~----------------------------'--------------------~-------------------------' ------------------------------------------------------------------~-------------' ' --------________ ,_:_:.c::;:c::.:cc._;_:;:;:;:
Year: 2023
Treatment
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Secllon 10 Length Width Area FC Surf Current PCJ PCI Cost Rating Treatment
ENCINITA AVENUE
LONGDEN AVENUE
OLIVE STREET
OLIVE STREET
OLIVE STREET
OLIVE STREET
OAK AVENUE
CALLITA STREET
CAMELLIA AVENUE
CLOVERLY AVENUE
FRATUS DRIVE
JA YLEE DRIVE
LA ROSA DRIVE
McCLINTOCK AVENUE
NADINE STREET
PENTLAND STREET
BROADWAY EATON WASH ENCINITA 105
BURTON
AVENUE
MUSCATEL LONGDEN 228
AVENUE
LOMA AVENUE ENCINITA
AVENUE
TEMPLE CITY BALDWIN
BOULEVARD AVENUE
OLIVE
OLIVE
271
273
BALDWIN
AVENUE
ARDEN DRIVE OLIVE 274
ARDEN DRIVE EL MONTE
AVENUE
CAMINO REAL LONGDEN
AVENUE
OLIVE
OAK
275
262
501 W/0 ROSEMEAD CALLITA 049
ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD
BOULEVARD
cos GARIBALDI CAMELLIA 053
AVENUE
GARIBALDI
AVENUE
PENTLAND
STREET
WOODRUFF CLOVERLY 060
AVENUE
RIO HONDO FRATUS 121
AVENUE
LOMA AVENUE CDS
WEST END ENCINITA
AVENUE
FREER STREET GRAND
AVENUE
JAYLEE 177
LAROSA 190
McCLINTO 243
CK
CDS TEMPLE CITY NADINE 256
BOULEVARD
ROSEMEAD SULTANA
BOULEVARD AVENUE
PENTLAN 283
D
**-Treatment from Project Selection
Scenarios Criteria: Funclional Class<> 0-Olher
2,245
1,252
343
2,575
1,907
2,143
2,651
501
811
644
2,066
450
335
1,217
531
397
Type PCI Before After
36 80,820 C AC/AC
32 40,064 C AC/AC
36 12,348 C AC/AC
36 92,700 C ACIAC
36 68,652 C AC/AC
36 77,148 C ACIAC
36 95,436 C AC/AC
32 16,032 R AC/AC
36 32,022 C AC/AC
36 23,184 R ACIAC
28 57,848 R ACIAC
30 15,622 R AC/AC
54 18,090 R AC/AC
30 36,510 R AC/AC
27 15,928 R AC/AC
31 12,307 R AC/AC
12
SS1026
82 75
80 75
79 74
78 73
83 77
80 75
Treatment Total
56 46
Treatment Total
52 44
74 66
54 46
52 44
53 45
52 44
53 45
52 44
52 44
83 $31,231 39,737 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL
83 $15,482 39,662 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL
82 $4,772 39,820 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL
82 $35,822 39,906 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL
85 $26,529 38,511 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL
83 $29,812 39,694 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL
$164,668
100 $331,910 16,333 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (10%
DIGOUTS)
$331,910
100 $50,078 15,810 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
DIGOUTS)
100 $85,588 15,713 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
DIGOUTS)
100 $72,418 15,509 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
DIGOUTS)
100 $180,694 15,810 2" MILL AND OVERlAY (5%
DIGOUTS)
100 $48,797 15,669 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
DIGOUTS)
100 $56,506 15,810 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
DIGOUTS)
100 $114,043 15,669 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
DIGOUTS)
100 $49,753 15,810 2" MILL AND OVERLAY {5%
DIGOUTS)
100 $38,443 15,810 2"MILLANDOVERLAY(5%
DIGOUTS)
MTC StreetSaver
I T•mpi•City
Year: 2023
Scenarios-Sections Selected for Treatment
Interest: 3.00%
Treatment
Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 09/28/2018
Scenario: City's Budget
Street Name Begin Location End location Street tO Section 10 length Width Area FC Surf Current PCI PC! Cost Rating Treatment
SALTER AVENUE
WENOON STREET
WILLMONTE AVENUE
ALESSANDRO AVENUE
ALESSANDRO AVENUE
ARDSLEY DRIVE
BIDWELL STREET
BLACKLEY STREET
BLACKLEY STREET
BROADWAY
BROADWAY
ENCINITA AVENUE
ENCINITA AVENUE
ENCINITA AVENUE
ENCINITAAVENUE
ESTRELLA AVENUE
FAIRVIEW AVENUE
ESTRELLA
AVENUE
CLOVERLY
AVENUE
LONGDEN
AVENUE
PRIMROSE
AVENUE
DUFFY STREET BOGUE
STREET
SALTER 350
WENDON 385
WILLMONT 388
E
OLIVE STREET BLACKLEY ALESSAN 009
STREET ORO
BLACKLEY
STREET
CDS
PENTLAND ALESSAN 010
STREET ORO
TEMPLE CITY ARDSLEY 016
BOULEVARD
LOMA AVENUE ENCINITA
AVENUE
ENCINITA CDS
AVENUE
TEMPLE CITY GOLDEN
BOULEVARD WEST
AVENUE
TEMPLE CITY GOLDEN
BOULEVARD WEST
AVENUE
GOLDEN WEST BALDWIN
AVENUE AVENUE
BIDWELL 030
BLACKLEY 034
BLACKLEY 035
BROADWA 044
y
BROADWA 045
y
LONGDEN
AVENUE
GARIBALDI
AVENUE
GARIBALDI ENCINITA 100
AVENUE
WOODRUFF ENCINlTA 101
AVENUE
WOODRUFF LAS TUNAS ENCINITA 102
AVENUE DRIVE
EATON WASH SPRR (SOUTH ENCINITA 106
CITY LIMIT)
SALTER EAST CITY ESTRELLA 107
AVENUE LIMIT
WEST END McCLINTOCK FAIRVIEW 111
AVENUE
**-Treatment from Project Selection
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class <> 0 -Other
466
566
262
580
331
1,075
347
2,688
1,112
1,258
1,274
1,384
656
627
1,467
377
138
Type PCI Before After
22 10,252 R AC/AC
30 16,980 R AC/AC
30 6,812 R AC/AC
28 16,240 c AC/AC
32 10,592 C AC/AC
30 34,372 R AC/AC
32 11,104 R AC/AC
35 94,218 R AC/AC
34 37,808 R AC/AC
36 45,288 C AC/AC
34 45,864 C AC/AC
36 49,824 C AC/AC
36 23,616 C AC/AC
36 22,572 C AC/AC
36 52,812 C AC/AC
28 10,556 R AC/AC
26 3,588 R AC/AC
13
SS1026
53 45
53 45
54 46
Treatment Total
92 83
92 83
94 86
59 85
94 85
94 85
92 83
92 83
92 83
92 83
73 74
74 75
61 85
79 80
100
100
100
84
84
87
86
87
87
84
84
84
84
76
77
86
82
$32,024 15,667 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
D!GOUTS)
$53,039 15,662 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
DIGOUTS)
$21,278 15,507 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (5%
DIGOUTS)
$802,661
$40 1,070, SEAL CRACKS
816
$26 1,071, SEALCRACKS
798
$48 1,210, SEAL CRACKS
903
$17 1,141, SEALCRACKS
946
$131 1,205, SEAL CRACKS
331
$53 1 ,205, SEAL CRACKS
331
$111 1,074, SEALCRACKS
891
$112 1,074, SEAL CRACKS
891
$123 1,071, SEAL CRACKS
185
$59 1,071, SEALCRACKS
185
$109 858,973 SEAL CRACKS
$246 867,832 SEAL CRACKS
$16 1,141, SEAL CRACKS
946
$13 777,272 SEAL CRACKS
MTC Stree\Saver
I Temple City Scenarios-Sections Selected for Treatment
Interest: 3.00% Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 09/28/2018
Scenario: Budget
Year: 2023
Treatment
Street Name Begin location End Location Stree\10 Section 10 length Width Area FC Surf current PC! PCI Cost Rating Treatment
FLAHERTY STREET CLOVERLY
AVENUE
PRIMROSE FLAHERTY 117
AVENUE
GOLDEN WEST AVENUE LONGDEN GARIBALDI GOLDENW 138
LA ROSA DRIVE
LA ROSA DRIVE
LA ROSA DRIVE
LA ROSA DRIVE
LA ROSA DRIVE
LA ROSA DRIVE
LA ROSA DRIVE
LA ROSA DRIVE
LA ROSA DRIVE
LEMON AVENUE
LOMAAVENUE
PARMERTON AVENUE
SAINT JAMES DRIVE
SPARKLETT STREET
SPARKLETT STREET
WORKMAN AVENUE
AVENUE AVENUE EST
ALESSANDRO FIESTA
AVENUE AVENUE
LAROSA 192
FIESTA
AVENUE
TEMPLE CITY LAROSA 193
BOULEVARD
TEMPLE CITY CAMELLIA LAROSA 194
BOULEVARD AVENUE
CAMELLIA KAUFFMAN LAROSA 195
AVENUE AVENUE
KAUFFMAN GOLDEN LAROSA 196
AVENUE WEST
AVENUE
GOLDEN WEST BALDWIN
AVENUE AVENUE
LAROSA 197
BALDWIN
AVENUE
RYLAND
AVENUE
GLICKMAN
AVENUE
ENCINITA
AVENUE
HERMOSA
DRIVE
DANESWOOD
DRIVE
CDS
ARDSLEY
DRIVE
TEMPLE CITY
BOULEVARD
AllEY E/0
TEMPLE CITY
BOULEVARD
RYLAND
AVENUE
GLICKMAN
AVENUE
LAROSA 198
LAROSA 199
ARDEN DRIVE LAROSA 200
OAK AVENUE LEMON 211
LAS TUNAS LOMA 225
DRIVE
DAINES DRIVE PARMERT 281
ON
GARIBALDI SAINTJAM 349
AVENUE ES
TEMPLE CITY SPARKLET 355
BOULEVARD T
CAMELLIA
AVENUE
CAMELLIA
AVENUE
SPARKLET 356 T ,
WORKMA 407
N
u-Treatment from Project Selection
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class <> 0 -Other
582
1,281
1,099
521
364
342
340
1,396
636
659
599
252
292
487
173
245
367
155
Type PCI Before After
30 17,460 R AC/AC 64
36 46,116 C AC/AC 58
32 35,168 C AC/AC 92
32 16,672 C AC/AC 92
32 11,648 C AC/AC 92
32 10,944 C AC/AC 92
32 10,880 C AC/AC 92
32 44,672 C AC/AC
36 22,896 R AC/AC
36 23,724 R AC/AC
36 21,564 R AC/AC
32 8,064 C ACIAC
26 7,592
30 14,610
30 8,553
28 6,860
28 10,276
36 5,580
14
SS1026
C ACIAC
R AC/AC
R AC/AC
R AC/AC
R ACIAC
C ACIAC
92
94
94
94
43
43
64
67
94
67
43
85 88
83 84
83 84
63 84
63 84
83 84
63 84
83 84
86 87
85 87
85 87
83 84
83 84
85 86
85 86
86 87
85 86
83 84
$27 1,141, SEAL CRACKS
946
$119 1,060, SEALCRACKS
565
$87 1,071, SEAL CRACKS
798
$41 1,071, SEALCRACKS
546
$29 1,071, SEAL CRACKS
546
$27 1,071, SEAL CRACKS
546
$27 1,071, SEAL CRACKS
548
$110 1,071, SEAL CRACKS
546
$31 1,229, SEAL CRACKS
901
$33 1,206, SEAL CRACKS
518
$30 1,206, SEAL CRACKS
518
$21 1,060, SEAL CRACKS
$20
$23
$13
$10
$16
$15
565
1 ,060, SEAL CRACKS
565
1,141, SEAL CRACKS
946
1,141, SEAL CRACKS
946
1,210, SEAL CRACKS
903
1,141, SEAL CRACKS
946
1 ,060, SEAL CRACKS
565
MTC Stree\Saver
m Temple City Scenarios-Sections Selected for Treatment
lilili Interest: 3.00% Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 09/28/2018
Scenario: City's Budget
Treatment Total $1,783
Year 2023 Area Total 1,723,654 Year 2023 Total $1,395,456
Year: 2024
Treatment
Street Name Begin Location End Location Stree\10 Section ID Length Width Area FC Surf Current PCI PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Type PCI Before After
CAMINO REAL OAK AVENUE TEMPLE CITY CAMINO 058 1,267 34 43,078 c AC/AC 69 69 78 $27,434 23,734 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
BOULEVARD SEAL (2% DIGOUTS)
DAINES DRIVE CDS TEMPLE CITY DAINES 073 193 3 7,451 c AC/AC 68 69 78 $4,746 23,725 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
BOULEVARD SEAL (2% DIGOUTS)
PRIMROSE AVENUE LONGDEN FLAHERTY PRIMROS 292 882 28 24,696 c AC/AC 69 69 78 $15,728 23,740 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE STREET E SEAL (2% DIGOUTS)
VAL STREET BARELA GOLDEN VALSTREE 377 758 28 21,224 c ACfAC 69 69 78 $13,517 23,740 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE WEST T SEAL (2% DIGOUTS)
AVENUE
WORKMAN AVENUE AGNES ROWLAND WORKMA 411 400 36 14.400 c AC/AC 69 69 78 $9,171 23,739 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE AVENUE N SEAL (2% DIGOUTS)
Treatment Total $70,596
BROADWAY ROSEMEAD ENCINITA BROADWA 042 1,630 58 96,068 c ACfAC 88 81 88 $38,237 34,138 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
BOULEVARD AVENUE y SEAL
BROADWAY ENCINITA TEMPLE CITY BROADWA 043 2,503 36 90,108 c ACfAC 86 78 86 $35,865 36,496 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE BOULEVARD y SEAL
CRAIGLEE STREET BARELA EAST END CRAIGLEE 070 287 28 8,036 R ACfAC 77 72 80 $3,092 32,709 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE SEAL
DAINES DRIVE HALIFAX ROAD EL MONTE DAINES 077 1,419 32 45,408 c ACfAC 78 71 80 $18,074 38,602 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE SEAL
FREER STREET ARDEN DRIVE HALIFAX FREER 123 647 32 20,704 c AC/AC 88 80 88 $8,241 34,189 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
ROAD SEAL
FREER STREET HALIFAX ROAD EL MONTE FREER 124 1,410 32 45,120 c AC/AC 77 70 79 $17,959 38,332 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE SEAL
OLIVE STREET ROSEMEAD SULTANA OLIVE 269 580 36 20,880 c AC/AC 86 79 87 $8,311 36,087 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
BOULEVARD AVENUE SEAL
OLIVE STREET SULTANA LOMA AVENUE OLIVE 270 710 36 25,560 c AC/AC 86 79 87 $10,174 36,087 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE SEAL
OLIVE STREET ENCINITA TEMPLE CITY OLIVE 272 2,654 36 95,544 c AC/AC 82 75 83 $38,029 38,501 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE BOULEVARD SEAL
PERSIMMON AVENUE NORTH CITY DAINES DRIVE PERSIMM 287 1,147 28 34,410 c AC/AC 81 74 83 $13,696 38,612 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
LIMIT ON SEAL
•• -Treatment from Project Selection 15 MTC Slree!Saver
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class <> 0-Other SS1026
I Temple City Scenarios-Sections Selected for Treatment
Interest: 3.00% Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 09/28/2018
Scenario: City's Budget
Year: 2024
Treatment
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street tO Section 10 Length Width Area FC Surf Current PCI PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Type PCI Before After
HALDEMAN STREET BURTON CDS HALDEMA 149 236 32 7,358 R AC!AC 69 70 73 $41 661,756 SEAL CRACKS
AVENUE N
LEMON AVENUE NCL LONGDEN LEMON 210 135 26 3,510 R AC/AC 59 74 76 $16 918,654 SEAL CRACKS
AVENUE
MILLER DRIVE LOWER AZUSA SOUTH END MILLER 247 143 36 5,148 R AC/AC 69 70 73 $26 661,545 SEAL CRACKS
ROAD
OAK AVENUE LONGDEN GARIBALDI OAK 263 1,289 36 46,404 c AC/AC 63 83 64 $123 1,029, SEAL CRACKS
AVENUE AVENUE 674
PAL MALL AVENUE LIVE OAK DAINES DRIVE PALMALL 276 1,319 32 42,208 c AC/AC 62 63 64 $112 1,029, SEAL CRACKS
AVENUE 674
WEOGEWOOD STREET ENCINITA ALESSANDRO WEDGEW 379 700 32 22,400 R AC!AC 40 65 66 $35 1,108, SEAL CRACKS
AVENUE AVENUE DOD 685
WENDON STREET GOLDEN WEST ROWLAND WENDON 386 935 34 26,180 R AC!AC 69 70 73 $143 661,545 SEAL CRACKS
AVENUE AVENUE
WORTHINGTON DRIVE BURTON cos WORTHlN 413 176 24 5,994 R AC/AC 69 70 73 $33 861,756 SEAL CRACKS
AVENUE GTO
Treatment Total $770
AGNES AVENUE GARIBALDI LAS TUNAS AGNES 002 1,282 36 46,152 c AC!AC 35 14 100 $405,856 6,672 RECONSTRUCT
AVENUE DRIVE STRUCTURE (AC)
DAINES DRIVE BARELA CDS DAINES 074 163 52 6,514 c AC!AC 3 0 100 $57,256 6,672 RECONSTRUCT
AVENUE STRUCTURE (AC)
FAIRVIEW AVENUE PERSIMMON EAST END FAIRVIEW 110 150 33 4,500 R AC/AC 26 14 100 $38,061 5,834 RECONSTRUCT
AVENUE STRUCTURE (AC)
Treatment Total $500,973
Year 2024 Area Total 1,077,780 Year 2024 Total $1,396,923
Year: 2025
Treatment
Street Name Begin Location End Location Stree\ID Section ID Length Width Area FC sort Current PCI PCI Cost Rating Trealment
Type PCI Before After
McCLINTOCK AVENUE GRAND FAIRVIEW McCLINTO 244 760 26 20,280 R AC/AC 75 66 77 $12,471 20,247 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE AVENUE CK SEAL (3% DIGOUTS)
Treatment Total $12,471
.. -Treatment from Project Selection 17 MTC Stree\Saver
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class <> 0 -Other SS1026
I Temple City
Year: 2025
Scenarios-Sections Selected for Treatment
Interest: 3.00%
Treatment
Inflation: 3.00% Prtnted: 09/28/2018
Scenario: City's Budget
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section 10 Length Width Area FC Surf Current PCI PCI Cost Rating Treatment
RENO AVENUE
RENO AVENUE
RENO AVENUE
WORKMAN AVENUE
LONGDEN
AVENUE
GARIBALDI
AVENUE
HERMOSA
DRIVE
GARIBALDI RENO
AVENUE
HERMOSA RENO
DRIVE
ELM AVENUE RENO
300
301
302
ALLEY E/0 CAMELLIA
TEMPLE CITY AVENUE
BOULEVARD
WORKMA 407
N
LIVE OAK AVENUE GLICKMAN EAST CITY LIVEOAK 219
AVENUE LIMIT
ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD NORTH CITY CALLITA ROSEMEA 328
DS8 SB LIMIT STREET
ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD RANCHO REAL OLIVE ROSEMEA 337
DS8 SB ROAD STREET
ACASO DRIVE
ALESSANDRO AVENUE
BLACKLEY STREET
DAINES DRIVE
DAINES DRIVE
ENCINITA AVENUE
FLAHERTY STREET
HERMOSA DRIVE
MUSCATEl AVENUE
SULTANA SERENO ACASO 001
AVENUE DRIVE
PENTLAND LA ROSA ALESSAN 415
STREET DRIVE ORO
PARMERTON McCULLOCH BLACKLEY 036
AVENUE AVENUE
BALDWIN
AVENUE
WELLAND
AVENUE
LAS TUNAS
DRIVE
ENCINITA
AVENUE
BURTON
AVENUE
GARIBALDI
AVENUE
HALIFAX
ROAD
DAINES 076
SANTA ANITA DAINES 080
AVENUE
LIVE OAK ENCINITA 103
AVENUE
CDS FLAHERTY 116
MUSCATEL HERMOSA 167
AVENUE
LAS TUNAS MUSCATE 253
DRIVE L
**-Treatment from Project Selection
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class <> 0 -Other
1,494
1,064
462
155
2,586
170
198
568
529
233
2,571
648
1,316
314
1,183
2,090
Type PCI Before After
26 38,844 C AC/AC
26 27,664 C AC/AC
26 12,532 C AC/AC
36 5,580 C AC/AC
36 93,096 A AC/AC
38 6,460 A AC/AC
32 6,336 A AC/AC
32 18,176 R AC/AC
32 16,928 C AC/AC
26 6,058 R AC/AC
32 82,272 C AC/AC
32 20,736 C AC/AC
36 47,378 C AC/AC
24 9,197 R AC/AC
36 42,588 C AC/AC
36 75,240 C AC/AC
19
SS1026
92 81
91 80
92 81
43 81
Treatment Total
85 74
80 72
75 73
Treatment Total
71 71
72 70
71 85
66 83
48 83
66 83
42 85
65 83
48 83
88
88
88
88
$15,925 32,971 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL
$11,342 33,173 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL
$5,138 32,868 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL
$2,288 32,877 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
SEAL
$210,282
100 $346,670 11,756 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (10%
DIGOUTS)
100 $24,056 13,679 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (10%
DtGOUTS)
100 $23,594 12,350 2" MILL AND OVERLAY (10%
D!GOUTS)
$394,320
73 $102 643,850 SEAL CRACKS
73 $96 760,207 SEAL CRACKS
86 $10 1,076, SEALCRACKS
394
84 $225 999,684 SEAL CRACKS
84 $57 999,684 SEAL CRACKS
$130 999,684 SEAL CRACKS
86 $15 1,076, SEALCRACKS
394
84 $117 999,684 SEAL CRACKS
84 $206 999,684 SEAL CRACKS
MTC StreetSaver
I Temple City Scenarios-Sections Selected for Treatment
Interest: 3.00% Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 09/28/2018
Scenario: City's Budget
Treatment Total $844,049
Year 2026 Area Total 956,153 Year 2026 Total $1,398,607
Year: 2027
Treatment
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID Length Width Area FC Surf Current PCI PCI Cost Rating Treatment
Type PCI Before After
ALESSANDRO AVENUE PENTLAND LA ROSA ALESSAN 415 529 32 16,928 c AC/AC 72 69 78 $11,780 21,819 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
STREET DRIVE ORO SEAL (2% DIGOUTS)
GOLDEN WEST AVENUE LEMON LONGDEN GOLDENW 137 1,281 36 46,116 c AC/AC 75 69 79 $32,092 21,869 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE AVENUE EST SEAL (2% DIGOUTS)
Treatment Total $43,872
ACASO DRIVE SULTANA SERENO ACASO 001 568 32 18,176 R AC!AC 71 70 79 $7,642 29,882 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE DRIVE SEAL
DAINES DRIVE BALDWIN HALIFAX DAINES 076 2,571 32 82,272 c AC/AC 66 81 88 $35,783 30,990 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE ROAD SEAL
DAINES DRIVE WELLAND SANTA ANITA DAINES 080 648 32 20,736 c AC/AC 48 81 88 $9,019 30,990 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE AVENUE SEAL
ENCINITAAVENUE LAS TUNAS LIVE OAK ENCINITA 103 1,316 36 47,376 c ACIAC 66 81 88 $20,605 30,990 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
DRIVE AVENUE SEAL
FLAHERTY STREET CLOVERLY PRIMROSE FLAHERTY 117 582 30 17,460 R ACIAC 64 81 88 $7,341 26,808 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE AVENUE SEAL
HERMOSA DRIVE BURTON MUSCATEL HERMOSA 167 1,183 36 42,588 c AC/AC 65 81 88 $18,523 30,990 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE AVENUE SEAL
MUSCATEL AVENUE GARIBALDI LAS TUNAS MUSCATE 253 2,090 36 75,240 c ACIAC 48 81 88 $32,724 30,990 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE DRIVE L SEAL
PARMERTON AVENUE DANESWOOD DAINES DRIVE PARMERT 281 487 30 14,610 R ACIAC 64 81 88 $6,143 26,808 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
DRIVE ON SEAL
SAINT JAMES DRIVE CDS GARIBALDI SAINT JAM 349 173 30 8,553 R ACIAC 67 81 88 $3,596 26,808 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
AVENUE ES SEAL
SPARKLETI STREET ARDSLEY TEMPLE CITY SPARKLET 355 245 28 6,860 R AC/AC 94 81 88 $2,885 26,596 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
DRIVE BOULEVARD T SEAL
SPARKLETI STREET TEMPLE CITY CAMELLIA SPARKLET 356 367 28 10,276 R AC/AC 67 81 88 $4,321 26,808 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
BOULEVARD AVENUE T SEAL
WORKMAN AVENUE TEMPLE CITY ALLEY EIO WORKMA 406 235 36 8,460 c ACIAC 92 81 88 $3,680 31,205 SLURRY SEAL AND CRACK
BOULEVARD TEMPLE CITY N SEAL
BOULEVARD
Treatment Total $152,262
**-Treatment from Project Selection 23 MTC StreetSaver
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class<> 0-Other S$1026
I TomploCity Scenarios-Sections Selected for Treatment
Interest: 3.00% Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 09/28/2018
Scenario: Budget
Year: 2027
Treatment
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID Length Width Area FC Surf Current PC! PC! Cost Rating Treatment
ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD SCL (RR
NB CROSSING)
ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD HERMOSA
NB DRIVE
ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD END OF AC
NB PAVEMENT
ARROWOOD STREET
CLOVERLY AVENUE
CDS
LIVE OAK
AVENUE
END OF PCC ROSEMEA 327
PAVEMENT DNB
GARIBALDI ROSEMEA 318
AVENUE DNB
PENTLAND ROSEMEA 326
STREET DNB
DALEVIEW ARROWO 019
AVENUE OD
BROADWAY CLOVERLY 063
CLOVERLY AVENUE
DALEVIEWAVENUE
lOWER AZUSA GIDLEY
ROAD STREET
FREER STREET GRANO
ClOVERlY 068
DALEVIEW 081
DANBURY STREET
ELLIS LANE
ELM AVENUE
HART AVENUE
LEMON AVENUE
LONGDEN AVENUE
MUSCATEL AVENUE
MYDAAVENUE
PENTLAND STREET
CDS
TEMPLE CITY
BOULEVARD
ROSEMEAD
BOU~EVARD
HERMOSA
DRIVE
AVENUE
SANTA ANITA
AVENUE
130Sf0
lOWER
AZUSA ROAD
DANBURY 084
ElliS 092
130' EIO ElM 094
ROSEMEAD
BOULEVARD
lAS TUNAS HART
DRIVE
163
OAK AVENUE TEMPLE CITY LEMON
BOULEVARD
212
MUSCATEl
AVENUE
lAS TUNAS
DRIVE
HERMOSA
DRIVE
ENCINITA
AVENUE
ROSEMEAD LONGDEN 229
BOULEVARD
SOUTH CITY MUSCATE 254
liMIT l
CDS MYDA 255
ALESSANDRO PENTLAN 284
AVENUE D
u-Treatment from Project Selection
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class<> 0 -Other
969
1,096
108
288
916
448
1,212
195
1,000
509
502
1,265
1,083
200
414
1,126
Type PCI Before After
26 25,194 A PCC
30 32,880 A ACfAC
30 3,240 A ACIAC
24 9,201 R AC!AC
36 32,976 C AC!AC
34 15,232 R AC!AC
38 47,328 C AC!AC
24 6,412 R AC/AC
36 36,000 C AC/AC
32 16,288 R AC/AC
26 13,052 C AC/AC
36 40,480 C AC/AC
36 38,988 C ACJAC
36 7,200 C ACIAC
27 12,726 R ACIAC
34 38,284 R AC/AC
24
SS1026
80 74
Treatment Total
83 73
83 73
Treatment Total
47 85
72 83
50 85
73 70
50 85
55 83
94 84
54 83
54 83
70 83
56 83
49 85
75 74
91 $102,270 19,668 DEEP PATCH {25%}
$102,270
100 $106,061 14,554 2" Mill AND OVERLAY {5%
DIG OUTS)
100 $10,452 14,554 2" Mill AND OVERLAY {5%
DIGOUTS)
$116,513
86 $16 1,014, SEAl CRACKS
604
84 $96 942,298 SEAL CRACKS
86 $26 1,014, SEAL CRACKS
604
73 $283 718,819 SEAL CRACKS
86 $11 1,014, SEAL CRACKS
604
84 $105 942,298 SEAL CRACKS
85 $37 877,929 SEAl CRACKS
84 $38 942,298 SEAl CRACKS
84 $118 942,298 SEALCRACKS
84 $113 942,298 SEAl CRACKS
84 $21 942,298 SEAl CRACKS
86 $22 1,014, SEAl CRACKS
604
76 $208 625,711 SEAl CRACKS
MTC StreetSaver
I Temple Cily
Year: 2027
Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section 10 Length Width Area FC surf
Type
RANCHO REAL ROAD SULTANA LOMA AVENUERANCHOR 297 707 36 25,452 R AC/AC
AVENUE
ROCCUS LANE BURTON CDS
AVENUE
RYLAND AVENUE LA ROSA DRIVE lOWER
AZUSA ROAD
SPARKLETT STREET CAMELLIA KAUFFMAN
AVENUE AVENUE
SULTANA AVENUE HERMOSA LAS TUNAS
DRIVE DRIVE
SULTANA AVENUE LAS TUNAS BROADWAY
DRIVE
VAL STREET GOLDEN WEST EAST CITY
AVENUE LIMIT
WORKMAN AVENUE ROWLAND CITY LIMIT
AVENUE
AGNES AVENUE OLIVE STREET LA ROSA
DRIVE
AGNES AVENUE LA ROSA DRIVE LOWER
AZUSA ROAD
•• -Treatment from Project Selection
Scenarios Criteria: Functional Class <> 0 -Other
EAL
ROCCUS 309 208 26 7,530 R AC/AC
RYLAND 348 1,542 36 55,512 R AC/AC
SPARKLET 357 345 28 9,660 R AC/AC
T
SULTANA 363 658 26 17,108 c ACIAC
SULTANA 364 1,840 36 66,240 c AC/AC
VALSTREE 378 669 28 18,732 c AC/AC
T
WORKMA 412 224 36 8,064 c AC/AC
N
AGNES 004 1,462 32 46,784 c AC/AC
AGNES 005 1,540 36 55,440 c AC/AC
Year 2027 Area Total 1,101,654
Total Section Area:
25
881026
10,945,284
Scenarios-Sections Selected for Treatment
Interest: 3.00% Inflation: 3.00% Printed: 09/28/2018
Scenario: Budget
Treatment
Current PCI PCI Cost Rating Treatment
PCI Before After
46 85 86 $44 1,014, SEAL CRACKS
604
46 85 86 $13 1,014, SEAL CRACKS
604
47 85 86 $95 1,014, SEAL CRACKS
604
54 85 86 $17 1,014, SEAL CRACKS
604
53 83 84 $50 942,298 SEAL CRACKS
56 83 84 $192 942,298 SEAL CRACKS
55 83 84 $55 942,298 SEAL CRACKS
54 83 84 $24 942,298 SEAL CRACKS
Treatment Total $1,584
17 0 100 $449,341 6,105 RECONSTRUCT
STRUCTURE (AC)
28 0 100 $532,478 6,105 RECONSTRUCT
STRUCTURE (AC)
Treatment Total $981,819
Year 2027 Total $1,398,320
Grand Total $13,962,708
MTC StreetSaver
f !NCE Collaboration . Commitment. Confidence ~ ...
Appendix H
GIS Maps
E11g in eering & Environmental Services www. ncenet. com
f !NCE Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence ~"
Current (2018) PCI Condition
l:.llg inePr ing & E.nv i r omne ntal Services www. ncenet. com
f !NCE Collaboration. Commitment. Confidence ~
Projected Network Condition
FY 2027/28
Under Scenarios 1 - 5
l:.ng i neeri ng & lnvir onntental Ser vices www. nee net. com
f !NCE Collaboration . Commitment. Confidence ~~~
Appendix I
Pavement Network Breakdown -
20-Year Analysis
Current Condition (2018)
Projected Condition (FY 2038/39)
Scenarios 6A-9D
f ng i neeri ng & f:.nv u onme nta l Ser v1ccs www. nee net. com
ATTACHMENT B
Presentation
-~ (/)
>-ro c: ro
LLJ u z •• ~·
~
L...
0
~
Q.)
c
'+-
0
..c
~
co
Q.)
..c
co
~ co
"'0
en en
Q.)
L...
~ en ·-"'0
~ c
Q.)
E
Q.)
> co a..
1:5
(]) --0
(.)
~: ~ ..
Q.)
~
~
(.)
c
0
(.)
~
co ..c a.. en
<(
~: ~ ..
(.)
(.) a...
~: ~ ..
B l
:...
f ! Existing Budget with SB 1 funding -$1.4 m/year
~!Maintain PCI at 58 -$2.5 million per Year
~!Improve PCI to 65-$3.4 million per Year
~!Improve PCI to 75-$4.6 million per Year
~! Improve PCI to 80 -$5.2 million per Year
m
Ill t !NCE
Pavement Condition for Scenarios 1-5
Current Condition
Poor
34.5%
Scenario 3: Improve PCI to 65
Fair
0.4%
m
Ill
Poor
3.1°/o
Fair
Scenario 1: City's Budget
0.4°/o -l
Scenario 4: Improve PCI to 75
Fair
0.4°/o
Scenario 2: Maintain PCI at 58
Scenario 5: Improve PCI to 80
Fair Very
Poor
5.6%
t !NCE
Condition for Scenarios 7A-7D after 20 Years
Current Condition
Poor
34.5%
m
Ill
Poor,
4.20/o
7A: $8m Up-front + $2.716m/yr 78: $9m Up-front + $2.626m/yr
7C: $10m Up-front+ $2.541m/yr 70: $15m Up-front+ $2.1m/yr
t !NCE
Condition for Scenarios 9A-9D after 20 Years
Current Condition
Poor
34.5%
m
Ill
9A: $8m Up-front+ $4.716m/yr 9B: $9m Up-front + $4.626m/yr
9C: $10m Up-front+ $4.541m/yr 90: $15m Up-front+ $4.1m/yr
f !NCE
~! Comply with policies for:
-Sustainable communities
-Local economy
~! Ensure acceptable quality of life for residents, visitors &
businesses
-Smoother rides
-Lower maintenance cost for vehicles
-Home value changes with pavement conditions
g '! Ensure taxpayer's investment in transportation
m infrastructure is protected
Ill f !NCE