HomeMy Public PortalAboutA1980-06-17CC CITY OF LYNWOOD '�I 11330 BUM
0 ° s, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262
(213) 537 -0800
EUGENE R. GREEN, Mayor
JOHN D. BYORK, Mayor Pro -Tem
Councilmen
E. L. MORRIS
JAMES E. ROWE
LOUIS A. THOMPSON
AGENDA'ITEMS ON FILE FOR CONSIDERATION
AT THE MEETING OF THE LYNWOOD CITY
COUNCIL TO BE HELD ON JUNE 17, 1980
OPENING CEREMONIES
•
1. INVOCATION - FATHER DONAL O'CONNOR - St. Emydius Church
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE'- GIRL SCOUTS
3. CALL TO ORDER MAYOR EUGENE R. GREEN
4. ROLL CALL OF. COUNCILMEN - CITY CLERK COFFEY
JOHN D. BYORK
E. L. MORRIS
JAMES E. ROWE
LOUIS A. THOMPSON
EUGENE R. GREEN
SCHEDULED MATTERS
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - JUNE 3, 1980
6. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE CHANGE FROM R -1 TO R -2 AT 11438 SPRUCE STREET
Comment: Zoning to the north of subject property is R -2 and to
the south is R -1. William and LaVerne Loving now have
a single - family residence. There is an area 60X60 to
the rear of the R -1 residence. If the zone change is
approved, they could apply for a building permit to con -
struct an additional structure which would have to meet
all Code requirements including a four -car garage. - The
Planning Commission had a public hearing on May 13. and
approved the zone change.
Recommendation: After receiving public testimony, Council approve
the zone change from R -1 to R -2.
7. PUBLIC HEARING - ZONE CHANGE FROM R -3 TO M AT 11063 WRIGHT ROAD
Comment: The General Plan designation has the properties on both
sides of Wright Road in the vicinity of the above project
for industrial use. Current zoning is R -3. At its hear-
' - ing on the zone change, the Planning Commission primarily
deliberated on methods that may be used for bringing the
zoning into conformance with the General Plan. A variety
of methods were discussed in attempting to establish a
policy for bringing about this conformance. The request
for rezoning was approved because of the extenuating cir-
cumstances
on the property. Staff was instructed to
inform Council that the Commission's intention is to
ultimately rezone the property back to R -3 until a policy
is established on bringing zoning into compliance with
the General Plan.
Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends approval of
the zone change at 11063 Wright Road. The staff recommends
approval of the zone change and that the Council direct
staff to notify. the Planning Commission that such zoning
should remain, and a study be .initiated for methods to
bring about conformance of zoning with the General Plan.
8. PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE 570
Comment: The proposed amendments involve two areas. First, set-
backs and distances between buildings in residential
zones and second, control over automotive facilities in
all C Zones.
In the residential amendments proposed, we would allow
the maintenance of setbacks and distances between build-
ings as. they were originally built in cases of housing
rehabilitation and upgrading.
The control of automotive facilities would be through
the implementation of a Conditional Use Permit procedure.
The Planning Commission was unanimous in recommending .
these changes to the Code. •
Recommendation: Council introduce and waive further reading of .
an ordinance entitled:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 570 BY ADDING THERETO SECTION
4.04.B.8 WITH RESPECT TO SIDE AND REAR YARD REQUIREMENTS,
SECTIONS 4.04.B.9 and 10 WITH RESPECT TO DISTANCE BETWEEN
BUILDINGS, AND SECTION 14.13 WITH RESPECT TO AUTOMOTIVE
USES AS DEFINED."
NEW BUSINESS
9. SOUTHEAST AREA ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHORITY
I -105 FREEWAY CORRIDOR STUDY - IMPACT ON ANIMAL CONTROL
Comment: Cities along the I -105 Freeway corridor have been
suffering from an influx of animals into the corridor.
To address this Southeast Area Animal Control Authority
has put together a proposal in which the Corridor Cities
may Join in requesting funds from CalTrans for animal
control in the area. The attached report outlines the .
details of the project.'
Recommendation: Council approve the City's participation in
applying for the subject grant.
10. RATE ADJUSTMENT REQUEST BY C V DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC.
•
Comment: On July 1, 1978, the City entered into a 5 -year agreement
for refuse collection with CV Disposal Service, Inc.
Section 16 of the agreement states that they are eligible
•
to have a review of its rates at the end of each year of
the contract. The first review was scheduled for July
1979, but was not made until December when a request was
made for 27 and 33% rate increases for residential and
commercial services. The City granted a 16% increase
across the board to be effective January 1980, and again '
in July, 1980. CV Disposal has a continuing loss on our
City account and has requested a 22% rate increase to
be effective July, 1980. The Consumer Price index is
one basis to decide rate increases and is expected to
be 11 %. If the City were to approve an 11% increase in
residential service, the rate would change from $3.38 to
$3.75; a 17% rate increase in commercial rates would
change from $33.06 to $38.68. CV Disposal has agreed
•
to reduce the requested increase to 11% for residential
and 17% for commercial.
•
Recommendation: Council approve an 11% rate increase for
residential trash service and a 17% rate increase
for commercial service effective July 1, 1980, and
instruct staff to prepare.the necessary documents.
11. LEASING PUMPING RIGHTS.
Comment: The City does not have enough pumping rights to supply
the demand. Candlewood Country Club will lease 145
acre feet of water. at $33 per acre foot for a total of
$4,785. This water will be extracted by the end of
the current year, September 30, 1980. In securing the
above lease, the City will save approximately $6,000.
Recommendation: Council approve the water rights license and
agreement between Candlewood Country Club and the City •
of Lynwood and authorize Mayor to execute. same.
12. FISCAL .YEAR, 1980 -81 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
DEBIT LIMIT REPORT
Comment: The 1978 -79 assessment recovered.a deficit in the street
• lighting'fund and allowed fora reduction in assessment •
for the following 1979 -80 year. We presently have and
expect a small positive balance in the street lighting
fund at the end of the three year assessment period
based upon the current assessment. This positive balance
•
will be in accordance. with Section' 18092.1 of the
Government Code applied to future assessments to-offset
ever increasing costs. Therefore, the 1980 -81 Street
Lighting Assessment is proposed to remain the same as
the 1979 -80 assessment.
Recommendation: Council approve the 1980 -81 assessment rate,
remain the same as the 1979 -80 rate.
13. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING HUD FY 1980 INNOVATIVE GRANT
APPLICATION FOR A COMMUNITY ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECT
Comment: In February HUD announced competition for FY 1980
Innovative Grants which will utilize proven energy
conservation activities in local community and economic
development activities. We would request approximately
$200,000 to implement this ERGS (Energy Retrofit Grant
Subsidies) project which will be.100 %,federally funded.
The project would be to award .grants to homeowners
and small business owners for the purpose of assisting
them in weatherizing and retrofitting their properties.
By implementing Project ERGS, the City will be moving
closer to. achieving its overall goal of upgrading
Lynwood's housing stock and commercial areas...
Recommendation: Council adopt a resolution. entitled:
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR FUNDS AVAIL-
ABLE THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN:
DEVELOPMENT'S FY 1980 INNOVATIVE GRANTS FOR COMMUNITY •
ENERGY CONSERVATION."
14. STATE 'H C D LOAN APPLICATION
Comment: The Deferred Payment Rehabilitation Loan Program was
established by the passage of SB 966 in 1978. The
program administered by the California Department of
Housing and Community Development provides deferred
payment loan funds to local agencies that operate
rehabilitation programs and is designed primarily to
assist with the rehabilitation of housing for low and
moderate income households. HUD is currently solicit-
.
ing proposals for use of-their available funds. We
have prepared a proposal that would expand the present
deferred loan capabilities by $150,000 through the
above program and would increase the current rehabilita-
tion program by 20% and thereby help more residents.
•
•
et
Recommendation: Council adopt a resolution entitled:
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR
FUNDS AVAILABLE THROUGH THE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPART-
MENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT."
15. SECTION 8 EXISTING RENTAL UNITS
Comment: The Housing Authority of Los Angeles County has re-
quested the Mayor to send a Letter of Support to the
Department of Housing and Urban Development, regarding
their application for an additional 184 existing rental
assistance units. These 184 units will be allocated
throughout the County of Los Angeles in areas where
the Housing Authority has jurisdiction. The City of
Lynwood is serviced by the Housing Authority, and,
at this time, has a demonstrated need for 600 addi-
tional rental assistance units. As part of the City's
Housing Element the City has committed itself to assist
in providing safe and decent housing for residents of
all income levels. By supporting. the. Housing Authority's
request, the City Council would be meeting its commit-
ment to provide safe and decent housing for all the
residents of the City.
Recommendation: Council approve the sending of a Letter of
Support to the Department of Housing and Urban Develop-
ment.
16. SECTION 8 MODERATE REHABILITATION PROGRAM
Comment: The Housing Authority of Los Angeles County has requested
the Mayor to send a Letter of Support to the Department
of Housing and Urban Development, regarding their appli-
cation for an additional 409 moderately rehabilitated
rental units. These 409 units will be alloted through-
out the County of Los Angeles in areas where the Housing
Authority has jurisdiction. The City of Lynwood is
serviced by the Housing Authority and at this time has
a demonstrated need for good additional Section 8 rental
assistance units. As part of the City's Housing Element
the City has committed itself to assist in providing
safe and decent housing for residents of all income
levels. By supporting the Housing Authority's request
the City Council would be meeting its commitment to
provide safe and decent housing for all the residents
of the City.
Recommendation: Council approve the sending of a Letter of Support
to the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
17. PAYMENT OF BILLS - WARRANT REGISTER DATED JUNE 17, 1980
Recommendation: Council approve payment of bills of Warrant
Register dated June 17, 1980
OLD BUSINESS
18. ELECTRIC VEHICLE GRANT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
Comment: On August 21, 1979, the Council approved a resolution
authorizing submission of a grant application to parti-
cipate in the DOE Electric Vehicle Demonstration Program.
This application was approved in February. During March
through May 1980, staff negotiated with DOE and established
the following cost sharing ratio: DOE's share $160,932
(77 %) and City's share $49,153 (23 %) for a total cost
of $210,085. Project cost will include the purchase of
ten electrid vehicles, replacement parts and maintenance
over a four -year period. It should be noted that much
of the City's share will be in -kind donations. A copy
of the agreement is on the desk of the Conference Room
for Council review.
Recommendation: Council approve the Cooperative agreement and
authorize Mayor to execute it.
19. LIABILITY INSURANCE EXTENSION OF POLICY FROM APRIL 16, 1981 TO.
JUNE 30, 1981
Comment: In April Council approved the liability insurance policy
effective April 16, 1980 to April 16, 1981, but requested
that cost be extended through the fiscal year, June 30,
1981, with Fremont and Midland Insurance Companies.
Fremont Insurance Company required $5,997 for the ex -.
tension, while Midland Insurance Company is willing to
extend their coverage for an additional premium of
$3,998. The total cost for the current $5 million
coverage is $9,995. The current cost of liability
coverage is $48,756.or,$133.08 per day. The extension .
cost is $9,995 for an additional 75 days coverage or
$133.27 per day. The cost of the extension is compar-
able to the cost of current coverage.
Recommendation: Council approve the extension of the current
liability coverage from April 16, 1981 to June 30, 1981 .
for a total of $9,995.
20. LIABILITY INSURANCE - ADDITONAL $.5 MILLION COVERAGE
Comment: On April 1, 1980 Council approved the liability. insurance
. policy. with Fremont and Midland Insurance Companies with
a $50,000 Self - Insurance Retention, a $300,000 Stop
Loss, and a $5 million limit of protection for the
amount of $48,756. Council further requested a cost
on an additional $5 million of coverage. Midland
Insurance Company would provide an additional $5 million
coverage for the period April 16, 1980 to April 16, 1981
for $6,225; for the period April 16, 1980 to June 30,
1981 for $7,501. The daily average cost for the
additional $5 million is $17.05. The City has a very
good record of accidents and losses in the past three
policy years. However, $10 million would protect the
City from any potential substantial lawsuits.
Recommendation: Council approve the additional $5 million coverage
with Midland Insurance Company for the period of April 16,
1980 to June 30, 1981 for the amount of $7,501.
ROUTINE ITEMS
THE COUNCIL MAY WITH A SINGLE MOTION ADOPT ALL ITEMS AS RECOMMENDED
IN THIS SECTION.
21. REQUEST FROM AMERICAN COUNCIL OF ATHLETICS, ORANGE, CALIFORNIA,
FOR TAX EXEMPT LICENSE TO SOLICIT CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM
JUNE 15, 1980. FOR THE LONGEST PERIOD OF TIME POSSIBLE.
22. REQUEST FROM MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION FOR TAX EXEMPT LICENSE
TO CONDUCT FUND RAISING APPEALS DURING JULY, AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER,
1980.
23. REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR CURB NUMBERING LICENSE FROM
MR. JACK DAMERON, 9256 RAPLIFFE 1 #2. APPLICATION HAS BEEN APPROVED
BY THE CITY ENGINEER.
Recommendation: Council approve requests.
COUNCIL ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
I_ I,II� � .. . . . .� . .
. • � �
PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
AD�OURNMENT
Motion to adJourn to the AdJourned Regular Meeting of the City
Council of the City of Lynwood to be held �uly 1, 1980 at
7 p.m. in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road,
Lynwood, California.
* * *
REGULAR MEETING OF THE LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
�une 17, 1980
•
DATE: May 26, 1980
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL p
FROM: CHARLES G. GOMEZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR `�
SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE FROM R -1 TO R -2 AT
11438 SPRUCE STREET
ASSUMPTIONS
Zoning to thenorth of subject property is R-2 and to the south.is R -1.. The subject
lot meets the Code in terms of frontage on the street and square footage of the
lot (minimum 6, 000 square feet).
FACTS
William and La Verne Loving have a single- family residence at the• noted address.
on Spruce Street. It has an area to the .rear of the R -1 structure that measures
60 x 60. The property has, a single car garage and two driveways- -one on the
north and one on the south of the existing, residence: If the zone change is ap-
proved, Mr. it Mrs. Loving could apply for a building permit to construct an
additional structure on their property. Such a structure would have to meet all
Code requirements including garage space for 4 cars.
ANALYSIS
The Planning Commission had a public hearing (May 13, 1980) on this matter and
the concern centered around the ability of the proponents to construct according
to Code. The Commissioners' fears of a substandard structure being built on
the property were allayed upon being told by the City Attorney that unless the
proponents meet the Code requirements, ao building permit may be issued.
RECOMMENDATION
The staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of the zone change
from R -1 to R -2.
•
•
•
, ..
I' ` �
:»i
RESOLUTION NO. 688
:� RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TSE
CITY OF LY:VWOOD APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-I
(SIi`IGL.E-F3�/IILY UPITT) TO R-2 (NIiTLTIPLE -FAyIILY UNIT)
ON LOTS 1226 and 1227 OF TRACT 3335, 11438 SPRUCE STREET,
CITY OF LY`1WOOD.
WHERF.?,S, the Lynwood Pianaing Commission. pursuant to Iaw,
did on Vlay 13, 1980, l�oid a public hearing on the appLication oi Witliam and
' La Verne Loving for a zone change from R-1 to R-2 on Lots 1226 and 1227 of
� Tract 3335, i1438 Spruce Street, City of Lynwooc:
I
WHERE?�S, the Commission has carefuIly considered a11 pertiaeat
testimony offered ia the case as preseatad in the pubiic hearing;
VOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission
iinds and conciudes:
t. That proposed site meets existing City ordinances governing
residerrtial developmeat:
2. That the pr000sed zoae is in accordance with the Lynwood Generai
Plan:
3. That *_he graating of rush zone change wi11 not be detri.meatal io the
ambieat qualitp oi the e�sting environmeat surrounding the project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that said Commission recommeads the
;rantiag of a zone chaage to William and La Verne Loving for a zoae change
' i^oa R-i to R-2 on Lots 1226 and 1227 oi Tract 3335, 11438 Spruce Street,
, City oi Lynwood provided VIr. Loving submits an accurate ptot plan to the Building
Deat.
ROLL C�LL:
�yes: Hii1, Her^era, Pryor, Kanka
Voes: Raymond, Read, Rob6ins
�bseat: None
�??RO�ED d�1D �DOPTED this l3th day of !�Iay, 1980.
�� �
�ecretar�
C ha krma n
•
DATE: May 26, 1980
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY. COUNCIL
•
FROM: CHARLES G. GOMEZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR'
SUBJECT: • ZONE CHANGE FROM R -3 TOM AT
11063 WRIGHT ROAD, LYNWOOD- •
•
ASSUMPTIONS
In January, 1979 a building permit was. issued to Mr. Henry Bigos for the coastruc-
twa of a building, at 11063 Wright Road. That permit was issuedia error on the •
basis that. the General Plan indicated industrial use in that area. The zoning on
the land, however, had never been changed. from R -3 to the appropriate zone (M).
Mr. Bigos was advised of the- error yin issuing the building permit and was in-
formed'that he needed a zone change-application which he filed 'with the Planning.
Department on February 12, 1980. An environmental' assessment was -made of the
proposed project and finalized on February 22, 1980. The zone change applica-
tion was heard by the Planning Commission on May 13 and approved unanimously
for recommendation to the City Council.
FACTS
The General Plan designation has the properties on both sides of Wright Road in
the vicinity of this project. for industrial use. Current zoning on the-property is
R -3 (Multiple Residential):.
•
ANALYSIS
At its hearing; on the zone change,. the Planning; Commission primarily deliberated
on methods that may be used for bringing the zoning into conformance with the
General Plan, particularly in areas such as the one wherein the subject property
lies. A variety of methods were discussed by the Commissioners in attempting
to establish a policy for bringing about this conformance. Some of the methods
we re:
I. initiate•large scale re- zoning of entire area;
2. P.cemeal re- zoning for conformance in block fashion--i.e., one •
block at a time;
3. Individual lot re- zoning such as is being done on the subject property;
4. Re- zoning in group lots.
`one of the methods discussed was adopted as a format for obtaining conformance
of General Plan in zoning.
The Commissioners decided they must .-Hake further analyses of the problem at
hand.
in that vein, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the Bigos'
recuest for re- zoning because of the extenuating circumstances on the property.
flirt titli
, ZONE CHANGE - 11063 - Wright Road page 2.
The staff was instructed to inform the City Council by inserting into Resolution . -
the- Commission's intention to ultimately re-zone the property back to R -3.
The purpose of reverting the zone change back to R -3 (once the subject zone change
is in effect) is an attempt by the Commission to legalize the structure that is cur-
rently on Mr. Bigos' property by creating a legal non - conforming use. In the
opinion of staff, .once the property is re -zoned to NI, that zoning should remain and
a. policy should be established that no such re- zoning requests be approved until a
method is adopted by the City for bringing conformance between the•Geaeral.Plan
and existing zoning..
The staff, therefore, will be presenting. the City Council with two opposing recom-
mendations-acne from the Planning Commission and one from -the staff.
RE CO MIvTN DATION
The ,.Planning Commission recommends approval of the zone change. at 11063 Wright.
Road with the full understanding that, upon finalization of that zone change, the.
Commission intends tore -zone backto.R -3.
The staff recommends approval of such zone change with directions to staff' to
notify the Planning Commission that such zoning should remain and that a study
should be• initiated for methods to. bring 'about conformance of zoning with the
General Plan.
x', .3p1
•
• RESOLUTION NO. 690 •
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
•
THE CITY OF LYNWOODAPPROVING A ZONE CHANGE FROM .
R -3 (RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE FAMILY) TO M
(MANUFACTURING) ON PORTION OF LOT 77 TRACT
10634, 11063 WRIGHT ROAD.
•
WH EREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission pursuant to
lawrdid on May 13,. 1980, hold a Public Hearing on the- appllcation.of
Henry C. Bigos : to request a Zone' Change from R -3 (Residential
Multiple Family) to M (Manufacturing) on portion. of Lot 77 of Tract
10634,.I.1063 Wright. Road, Lynwood,. California.
WHEREAS, the Commission has.carefully considered all
pertinent testimony offered • in the case, as presented in the Public
Hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning
Commission finds. and concludes:
1) That the granting of said zone change will not•be•
detrimental to the ambient quality of the existing environ-
meat,,: surrounding the subject property.
2) That the said zone change will allow for implementation
of the long range goals of the City.
3) The the said zone change is consistent with the Land
Use Element of. the General Plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that said Commission
approves the change of zoning for the property described above from
R -3 (Residential Multiple Family) to M (Manufacturing )subject to the
following conditions:
1) that the Commission advise the City Council that this
action is for this property separately;
•
2) that the staff be directed, upon completion of City Council
action, to change the zone from 3-3 to M and initiate a
one change back to R -3..'
ROLL CALL:
AYES: Kanka, Hill, Herrera, Pryor,
Raymond, Read, Robbins
•
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
APPROVED AND ADOPTED thiv1.3th of May, [980.
j v
Secretary V
Chairman
CITY OF LYNWOOD
DATE: June 12, 1980
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
FROM: CHARLES GOIVIEZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE 570
The attached report to the Planning Commission outlines the need for
changes to Ordinance 570. The Commission concurred with staff
that the amendments should be made to Ordinance, 570.
RECOMMENDATION
•
Staff recommends that the Council open up public hearing and take
public comments. Staff further recommends that the Council adopt
the ordinance entitled:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
AMENDING ORDINANCE 570 BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 4.04.B. 8
WITH RESPECT TO SIDE AND REAR YARD REQUIREMENTS,
SECTIONS 4.04.B.9 AND 10 WITH RESPECT TO DISTANCE BETWEEN
BUILDINGS, AND SECTION 14.13 WITH RESPECT TO AUTOMOTIVE
USES AS DEFINED."
• CGG /dt
Attach.
•
•
CITY OF LYNWOOD.
STAFF REPORT, TO
PLANNING COMMISSION
Meeting of June 10, 1980
•
TO: Members •of the Planning Commission
FROM: Charles Gomez, Planning Director
SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE 570 [80008] ,
DATE:. June 5, . 1980
BACKGROUND
. As the Commission is aware, the basic ordinance in the City governing land uses
is Ordinance 'No. .570.which was approved by the City Council as of September 4,: ,
1951. Because of the early date of adoption of that Ordinance, 'there is .a' multitude:
of amendments - -many of which have .not .been posted-- which,were the products of
emergency situations.
The changes being reviewed tonight are an attempt to update the Ordinance in two
areas: (1) • control of additions or expansions of existing residences and (2) control
of automotive-facilities.
ANALYSIS
Because the City of Lynwood'has been almost completely developed,. most of the
work currently underway in the City is in the form of rehabilitation of existing
• structures. This is especially true in the residential areas. In addition to the
large number of older residences (20,, 30 and 40 years old) many of the residences
were inherited from other jurisdictions in the process of annexation to enlarge.
the City boundaries. These inherited structures were constructed under Codes-
that were quite different from those of Lynwood. In turn, many of the structures
that were built according to Lynwood Code have experienced a changing of Codes .
which has made those structures. non - conforming. Nevertheless, there, has been-
considerable upkeep in the residential areas which has made the majority of
structures still viable for habitation. -The rehabilitation program that has been
in operation in the City for the past few years has encountered many problems,
due to side yard and'rear yard conditions that are not in accordance with our
current Code.
Sections 1, 2, 3 - Residential
The proposed changes to the Code would aIlow,the rehabilitation program to
proceed with upgrading many of the structures by allowing residents to maintain
setbacks and distances between buildings as they were originally built. If this is
not done, many of the rehabilitation efforts will have to be abandoned and the City
will be left with many unimproved residences.
• Section 4 - Automotive Uses •
In February 1979 an emergency ordinance was passed by the City of Lynwood
establishing a moratorium on automotive facilities in the C -3 zone. This was an
attempt to stall further installation of subject facilities pending the promulgation
of a'permanent Ordinance that would outline controlling mechanisms. That emer-
gency Ordinance (No. 1058) expired in June 1979 with no ordinance having been
adopted.
In April 1979 Ordinance 1064 (also an emergency ordinance) was •adopted ex-
tending the moratorium of Ordinance No. 1058 into the M zone. That Ordinance
expired in August 1979; again, with no permanent ordinance having been adopted.
•
• Amendments to Ordinance 570 (80008] 2
In October 1979, another emergency Ordinance (No. 1075) was adopted to con -
tinue the moratorium on automotive uses. However, No. L075 only covered C -3
zones. That Ordinance expired in February 1980 and still no permanent Ordinance
was placed on the books.
In September L979 a survey was made of automotive uses in the City and that
inventory was forwarded to the City Council and to the Planning Commission,
when the interim Ordinance was adopted in October. That inventory of automotive
uses has been updated for Planning Commission review. It indicates an increase
in the number of facilities within the City.
The problem is that although the moratorium was enacted , it was limited to the
C -3 zone; t herefore, allowing automotive uses to continue in an uncontrolled.
manner in the other commercial zones -- specifically, C -2 zone along Long Beach
Boulevard. This is evidenced by the Large number of currently existing uses
on all the major boulevards. Staff does not wish to preclude the installation of
such a useful commercial service in the City, but the primary' concern is in
controlling the physical appearance of all of these facilities. As the Commission .
is aware - -by its own observations--the majority of the automotive facilities •
lining our principal arteries are i[lkept and plague the City with violations ranging
from faulty wiring and plumbing to non - permitted uses (auto: salvageh
Section 4 of the attached. Ordinance establishes the requirement of a Conditional
Use Permit for any automotive use that is installed hereafter: It is the intent of
staff that the CUP requirement be imposed upon application for a business license —
whether it is a newt license or a renewal. This requirement' would, be applicable
on renewals only if the business ceased to operate for 30 days or more.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission support its recommendation to
the Council that the attached amendments to No. 570 be adopted.
, ;..
� �
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CTTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
A�/iENDING ORDINANCE 570 BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 4.04.B.8
WITH RESPECT TO SIDE AND REAR YARD REQUIRENLENTS, SECTIONS
�. 04. B. 9 and 10 4VITH RESPECT TO DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS,
; AND SECTION 14. 13 WITH RESPECT TO 9liTOMOTIVE USES AS
DEFINED.
The City Council of the City of Lynwood does ordain as follows:
Section t. Section 4.04.B Ordinance 570, the Zoning Ordinance, is
hereby amended by adding a new subparagraph thereto to read as foitows:
Section 4.04.B.8. Additions to or espansions of residential struc-
tures may maiatain the existing side and rear yard requirements pro-
vided the structure was in existence on January 4, 1980, if the esisting
setbacks were in conformance with previous applicable codes or
ordinances, and if the additions are not separate structures for human
habitation in R-1 zones.
Section 2 . Section 4. 04B of Ordinance 570.is hereby :urther amended
by adding a new subaaragraph thereto to read as follows:
Section 4. Oa, B, g, rldditioas to or espansions of residentiat struc-
tures may maintaia the distance between buildin�s (i. e. , distance bettiveen
structures and garages) which was in esistence on January �, 1980, pro-
vided that conditions of the City of Lynwood Fire Department with re5ard
to combustibility of materials and type of construction must be iulfilled.
Section 3 . Section 1.04.B of Ordinance � is further amended by
adding a new subnaragraph thereto to read as follows:
Section 4.04.B.10. The procisions oi Section 4.0?.B.° ofthis Ordi-
nance sha11 also apply to reptacement of garages in residential areas.
Section 1 . Chapter YIV of Ordieance 570 is hereby amer.ded by adding
a new Section 11.13 thereto to read as follo�vs:
Section 1�. 13 - Notwithstanding any oiher provision of this
Ordinance, Cor.ditionat lise Permit sha11 be reauired ior the construction, re-
consiruction, or operation of an automotive us2 on 2opropriatety zoned proper-
ties in zhe City oi Lyn�•vood.
, :i
� -
i. - � �
"Automotive use" sha11 mean: saies, repairs, servicing, reconditioning, paint-
ing, upholstering, body �uork, washing, and shallinclude new and used vehicles
or parts for vehicles. "Vehicie" sha11 mean automobiles, trucks, tractors,
wheeled heavy equipmeat, motorcycles, motorbicycles, mopeds, recreational
vehicles, and off-road vehicles.
Section � . Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision,
senteace, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance, or the aQplication there-
of to any person or ptace, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional
by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision sha11 not
affect the validitp of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or its apptication
to other persons or places. The City Council hereby declares that it would have
adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, senience,
clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that an� one or more
sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions,
or the appLication thereof to any person or place be declared invalid or uncon-
stitutionai.
Section 6 . The City Cleris is hereby ordered and directed to certify to
the oassage of this Ordinance and to cause the same to be published once in the
Lynwood Press, a newspaQer of geaeral circutation, printed, pubiished and cir-
culated in the City of Lynwood.
First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on
t:�e 17th day of June, 1980, and finally ordered published at a re�ular meeting of
said Councit hetd on the first day of July, 1°80.
�YES:
vOES:
�BSEVT:
Eugene R. Green, l�tayor
City of Lynwood
�L�L
; . �TTEST:
Laurene Coi:`ey, City C1erk
Ci�� ot Lvmcood
:_
� �
NVE'�VTORY OF :3LiT0 REL:�TED BUSIDIES5E5
Date of
vame Address Orig. License Tyoe of Business
Bolies Bear Service, Inc. 12111 atlaatic �ve. 7-88 Brake Shop
Bug `�1 Tr_kes 3521 Ceatury Bivd. 10-73 Garage
Cari's Quality Service 11036 Atlantic Ave. 3- i 6 Garage
C d� D Auto Service 11099 Atlaatic Ave. 6-79 New & tised Tire:
�utotron �utomotive 11801 Long Beach Blvd. 10-68 Garage
�vi1a's Body Shoo 11601 Long Beach Blvd. 8-79 Bodp Shop
D k E Auto Service 12509 Long Beach Bivd. 1-70 Garage
B 3. W. auto Transmissioas 1_1049 Atlantic Ave. 6-72 Transmissions
�1I Pro 9ato Repair 11133 Long Beach Blvd. 4-78 Voli�s Repair
_R�Pk29tt :��9 '_'_�s--�ser �aao �'�t���#�a :'�•ae } ; } � `Trs�e
1¢to Transmissions Periecio 3439 Ceatury B1vd. 8-79 Transmissions
�ny ?vtuifler Service 11�54 Atlaatic Ave. 6-77 �Iluffler Shop
v. �A. Reaair 11355 3tlantic :�ve. 1-7? Garage
:-ande: LTSed Cars 12321 Long Beach Blvd. 2-i2 Garage
:Villard's �uto Electric 1I048 Atlaatic �ve. 12-69 Parts & Repairs
: __ �: _ _. . _ _ -_ - - _ ' _ -
_ � � _ .
- - - ~ •-�-
. .--- _ - . _. . - - - � - - - - • - - -��
�- T 9g8 1.�aet�e =Lsze� �� �..,.,� a .a... �_ .,. ,
c^+-^�-r.r3
i s� Radiator �er•rice 2921 Ixaperial Hwy, �-7 � Radiator R2pa.ir
�ccion �. �V. Repair 3861 Iaperial Hwy. 11-77 Garage
� s G. �uto °ares � Repair 12708 �tlantic �ve. �-78 �uto Parts &. Re�
i a_� �uto �ot:ve °O�0 State Stree*. 3-7� ?,uto Sale & Body
Cantur.� Bodv Snoo 3002 C2ztury B1vd. 12- �3 Bod,v Shop
Cucz:.v �uto �er�rice 13703 �tlantic �ve. 7-53 3uto Repair
V I.� .� . . . 1 . . .
( �
� , `
Date of
Vame �ddress Ori,�. Licease Ty of Business
David's Body Shop 10840 Long Beach Blvd. ?-79 Body Shop
Discount Foreiga �uto 10919-1/2 Atla�tic ?,ve. 5-77 Auto Repair ShoQ
R epairs
Duncaa's Garage 52�0 Imperial Hwy 2-79 Garage
Ed's Garage � Auto Parts 12226 atlantic �ve. �-75 Garage
iieary's Shop 3200 Ceatury B1vd. 9-77 Radiator Repairs
W. Fleming Body Shop 11111 Loag Heach Blvd. 4-78 Body Wor+s
Hines Custom Auto Eat. I1508 Long Beacfi Bivd. 5-62 9utomotive Repai.
�iouse oi Coior . 2758 Ceatury Blvd. 1-&4 3uto Paiuiing
;maerial 3uto Body 11115 Long Beacfz Blvd. 3-78 �utomotive
L-aperi.al Glass Shop 11632 Atlaatic Ave. 1-70 Auto Glass Shop
J'.P Traasmiss�ons 12501 Long Beac� Blvd. 12-75 Transmissioa Sho
� " ,
La�bert Traasaissioas 11370 Long Beach B1vd. 3-69 Garage
Lynwood Garage 3311 iVIulford Ave. 6-57 Garage
'vIajestic �uto Bodp Shoo 11038 Atlaatic �ve. 1-77 Body Shop
1�Iark's ?,uto Glass 3?a4 Ceatury Blvd. 6-i3 3uto Glass Shop
l�iar+s's yIodiyiag 8c Fab. 1036a State St. 2-63 �uto ylodificatioa
l�i��dams �uto Repair 11011 Long Beach Blvd. 1-7g Used Car Sa1es
tio�:�k's ?,uto Body Shoo 11596 �tlantic Avenue
�1uto Body Shop
Oscar's 3ody S'r_oo 10i?9 Long Beac� Blvd. 1_78 Garage d� Bocy Si
`ava.�ro's Transaission 3c 11590 �tlarrtic �ve. 6-i9 :�uto Reoair
Ge.^_ersi � uto Repair
S34? Im erial H�vy. Garage
`,Ir. � olks�vagon P
� c: H Body �hop 11696 �tlaatic 3ve. .-77 �uto Body Shop
4av's �utoroti�re Ses�rice 3:2? Century Blvd.
3-&3 Gar2ge
10801 Lon Beach Bivd. Bodv Shoo & tiph
San `.Ia=*.in De Por*es �
3 i R yuto Ser�rice
2991 L*nperial H�,vy. 3-78 Body Shop/=�uio
Ji1:L`�S - '�'--1'C3':ie 5
! 0360 State 5t. Brake Servic°
�_78 Body & Repair
,�� �uto �ody �. Paint 3516 L*nperial :�wy• i_ ra Body Shop
�?'�vosa Dauun � ?=-^-po�� �? 30 I�pe*_ H�QY•
�J�Y �CO° Radi2ior Shoo
? 1"0? LonQ geac!� E1vd. 5-78
T�r�°- Disceur.t 3ac � _
. 1 I .. ._ .. a .
� ' l
IDIVE�tTORY OF AUTO RELATED BUSI'�i1ESSES - Additions to 1979 Report
v� 9ddress Date-License Type of Busine:
AAA Auto Repair 1O615 1/2 Long Beach Blvd. 9-79 General Repair
C& C D/Iotors 11005 Long Beach Bivd. 3-79 Used auto sate�
C& F Fiae Cars i0932 Long Beach Bivd. 1-80 Used auto sate:
Cudahy �uto Service i2702 Atlantic Avenue 7-73 Used auto aale�
Chief Auto Parts T8 L0913 Attantic Avenue
2-71 auto parts
Chief Auto Parts �77 9950.Long Beach BLvd.
12-75 Auto.parts
Gene's 9uto Parts 10003 Long Beach Blvd. 5-57 Retaii auto pa:
Dawson's Car Supoly 3�36 Ceatury Blvd
t1- 79 Retail auto pax
GS.� �uto Ylart, Inc. 11130.Long Beach Blvd. 11-74 Used auto sale
Gitterman Auto Sates 10550 Long Beach Bivd.
6-76 Used auto sale
Henry's ':Vlotors i0708 Wright Road
7_75 Engine valves
Internal Engine Pasts 11620 W*ight Road
g_7g Engine va?ves
heystone :�uto Supply 3553B Century B1vd.
5_77 Auto suppty
La1o's Body Shop 10711 Long Beach Blvd. 5-80 Body shop
Leonard's Body Shop 5200 I/2 Imperial Hwy
g_79 Body shop
Lvnwood �uto Parts i1366 Long Beach Blvd.
i-70 Auto parts
vational �uto Truck IO-79 Used auto sa1
Saies 11019 Atiantic 9veaue
Otf Road Periormance 10300 Santa Fe
7_;7 Offroad vehic
Part time �uto Suo. 10328 Long Beach Bivd.
g_79 �uto oarts
?: ecision ?�uto. Brakes 11628 �tlantic Ave.
g_77 9uto paris
Rev's tiIotors 10703 Long Beach Blvd.
g_79 �uto parts
S &. H �uto Suoply
11050 �tlantic �venue 2-74 �uto pares
�outh Gate �totors 11015 Long Beach Blvd.
6-03 Auto paris
�ntique auto
�'antage �uthentic 1 _43 parts
Reoroduction 10015 Lon� Beach Blvd.
SOUTHEAST AREA
ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHORITY
1 -105 FREEWAY CORRIDOR STUDY
IMPACT ON ANIMAL CONTROL
WILLIAM J. LOEHR
Chairman of the Commission
THEODORE H. JACKMAN
Commissioner
ARTHUR F. GERDES
Commissioner
Prepared by:
Burk M. Bussiere
Authority, Director
June 5,1980
- 1
4 /
1
i . � �
SOUTHEAST �1REA ANLYtAL CONTROL AUTHORITY .
MEMORAVDUM
TO: Honorable Chairman and Members, Board of Authority
Commissioners
FROM: Authority Director
DATE: 7une 5, 1980
SUBJECT: Analysis of I-105 Freeway Corridor Services Impact
Conclusion and Recommendation for Program Development.
HISTORY
In 7anuary and July, 1976, the Authority began full service in the cities of
Norwalk, Downey and Lynwood, which includes a substantial portion of the I-
!OS Freeway corridor. Preliminary assessment in 1976 of the animal control
profile along *.his corridor indicated a need for concentrated special enforce-
ment in that area. Some 8,000 man hours involving the Authority's special
rescue unit and regular patrol have been exhausted to merely control, but not
resolve the high incidents of feral and domestic dog packs in that area.
The dogs observed in these packs are living underneath and within abandoned
houses, garages, and apartments along the corridor. In some cases, heavy
vegetation and (ow brush growth around abandoned structures provides ideal
shelter for these roving bands. Detection has been extremely difficult and
almost impossible at night.
During the past four years continuous efforts have been made to correct the
problem at a substantial cost to both the Authority and the cities. Success
appears extremely dependant upon the quantity of manpower and resources
provided since routine animal control is not adaptive to coping with this type
of problem.
We also note that the corridor produces some interesting statistics:
. � �
�UBJECT: Analysis of I-105 Freeway Corridor Services Impact
Conclusion and Recommendation :or Program De��elopment
D?,TE: June 5, 1980
Page two
1. As high as 3 out of 7 stray dog calls in the City occur within a Y�
mile on either side of the corridor.
2. Up to 30% or 40% of the City's animal contro! calls occur within S�
mile of the corridor (Norwalk excepted, see item /�6).
3. As many as 1 of 3 animals impounded in the City comes from the
corridor area.
4. As high as 2 out of every 5 dog bites and nuisance problems occur
or originate from within the corridor area:
5. By comparison, only an estimated 20% or less of the City's
population lives near or within the immediate affected area.
6. The Ciry of Norwalk has a notably less total number of incidents,
,, however, when basing the statistics on a comparable geographic
area or per capita, the statistics are equal to if not higher than in
Downey or Lynwood.
7. Citizens walking or riding a bike are two times more likely to be
injured from a dog or cat bite in the corridor area than elsewhere
in the community.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
Analysis of the problem in the corridor suggests the foilowing:
!. The abandoned structures and vacant lots are an attractive nui-
sance for harboring feral and domestic stray dogs and cats.
2. Vacant buildings are not secured and allow easy access to stray
animals.
. � �
SLBJECT: Analysis of I-105 Freeway Corridor Services Impact
Conclusion �nG Recommendation ior Program Cevelopment
DATE: June 5, ;980
P=_g= three
3. Vacantlots and overgrown vegetation provide excellent screening
and cover during daylight hours for roving bands of dogs.
4. Proximity of human habitation, other domestic animals and refuse
containers provide an excellent source of food, especially during
night hours, when packs rampage along city streets, raiding back
yards and refuse containers and occasionally attacking pedestrians
and bicycle riders.
5. Dogs are territorial and communa! animals which makes them
extremely adaptive to the present corridor environment.
6. The short distance and vast number of escape routes back to their
corridor sanctuary makes routine animal contro( techniques
ineffective.
7. Inflationary trends of service costs, ineffective animal control in
some neighboring communities, and lack of additional resources
have further reduced effective animal control in the freeway
corridor.
Based upon the above analysis, we reach the following conclusions:
l. Specialized animal controltechniques have produced a reasonable
success in dealing with the problem in the corridor.
2. Dwindling resources and funds will further aggravate the situation
and increase the risk of injuries and spread of communicable
diseases in that area.
3. Service requirements are, in some cases, nearly double per capita .
in the corridor area than elsewhere in the community.
, � �
SliBJECT: Analysis of I-105 Freeway Corridor Services Impact
Conc!usion and Recommendation for Program Developr;�ent
DATE: June i, 1980
Page four
4. Vacant structures and overgrown vegetation needs to be checked
regularly and corrective measures taken where necessary.
5. A seven-day per week specialized two-man unit be assigned to the
corridor to inspect structures, patrol the area and where neces-
sary employ specialized equipment to capture packs of dogs.
6. Establish a routine on-going trapping program in the corridor to
capture highly mobile or rarely visibie animals such as feral dogs,
cats, foxes and skunks.
7. Develop an on-going assessment system to monitor program
effectiveness and deploy personnel and resources accordingly.
8. Deveiop a coordinated inter-agency system to assist irt closely
� related services such as fire inspections, general law enforcement
services, health services and general maintenance of the area.
RECOMMENDATION
In order to provide sufficient manpower and operational resources to achieve
the objectives set forth in the conclusion of this analysis we recommend the
following:
Item Quantity Cost
1. A two- man special rescue/capture 2912 $ 90,272
unit 7-days per week ($31 per hr). hrs/yr.
2. [m poundment and sheltering of 2500 7500 $ 26,250
domestic and wild animals at $3.50 impound
day including veterinary services days
and special observation / 3 day
average holding period
TOTAL PROGRAM COST $116,522
. _! I ..1 . �. . . . . .
� �
SL'B7ECT: ?.nalysis of I-105 Freeway Corridor Services Impact
Conclusion and Recommendation ior Pro�ram Development
DATE: �une 5, 1980 ,
°age iive
The above p�ojected unit costs would be valid for the period of July 1, 1980
through 7une 30, 1981. Ali projected costs are totals and represent all overhead
costs and support services including medical services, vehicle expenses,
communications services, specialized equipment, uniforms, medical and rtran-
quilization supplies, hardware for screening and securing structures and
personnel training and supervision.
It is hereby recommended that the above program be approved and adopted and
submitted to each affected City Council for ratification and petitioning to the
California Department of Transportation for funding effective July 1, 1980 to
June 30, 1981 and renewable successively thereafter, until the problem is
eradicated.
Respectfully submitted, _�
�% �.. �.��-
Burk �t. Bussiere,
BMB:djw
. . � �
STATISTICAL INFOR��tATION
ESTIVIr�TED SERVICES - THREE YEAR AVERAGE
Total
I-105 % of City
City Item Area Total Area
Lynwood:
Calls for service 1,980 40% 5,012
Animals impounded 1,138 30% 3,800
Animal bites and nuisances � 79 38% 202
Population distribution estimate $400 20% 42,000
Downey
Calls for service 1$88 29% 6,510
Animals impounded 556 10% 5,500
Animal bites and nuisances 33 18% 180
Population distribution estimate 7,800 8.7% 89,000
Norwalk
Calls for service 227 3% 7,500
Animals impounded 84 1.5% 5,700
Animal bites and nuisances 9 446 2u8
Population distribution estimate 273 .3% 91,000
.. I I .: _ : u .
. . , ! ` ' 1
1
� �
� .
�'� '.
� ;; public �c>ncy -
- - `_, " - -.:. ;.
_ -=- -"'"'� SuU � � ��;ST �+RtA ',Ivi"�iAL CONT�OL AUTNCni1' ;, ���
� •=_ �
'�� Ccdics�ed �o Ouality�r Care & Contro!
PO. B�iX <127 ! s7i' �c-. ,.A S'=.��T. D'. CALIFO^!:A 902G7 • ieL (2;3i ���_ �
�c= G:.:•: :=Y •.._-`:;AIK • PICC n:VERF • LYKWG�D • 3�LL G4nD"cN5 • 6�O�:TE3ELL0 • CG'.1:'c9CE • CUDAHY • SA.':iA Fc 5�9:!J�S
OPF�CE OF THE AUTHORIIY DIRECTOR
- -.: •, e.;se� .
�---,.�'� �..,wv
c-..-����s:.-�a rebruary 19, 1980
Dr. u'iliiam H. Kraus, City' Administrator
City of Norwalk
Mr. Charles W. Thompson, City Manager
City of Downey
�1r. Tommy Davis, City Manager
City of Lynwood
Gentlemen:
We note that ouring the past tnree years a disproportionate amount of znimal
" control service was reauired in the freeway cocridor areas. �e abandoned
houses have become a principle source of shelter for stray and wild dogs and
cats. Most of them enter the building through broken doors, windows and sub-
floor vents. Furthermore, an alarming amount of animal bites to humans have
occured within the vicinity of the corridor. Eariy estimates of occurrences in
the corrider are as high as 4C% of the entire City area. During tne pas: three
years an estimated 2,000 man hours of special patrol and enforcement zbove
normal services was required to reduce the health and safety threat in those
areas. The combined cost for this service to the Cities of Norwalk, Downey and
Lynwood exceeds $100,000.
In order to cope with this continued oroblem, an interim plan should be estab-
lished to assure that the corridor does not become a sanctuary fbr wild and
domestic dogs and cats. This may be accomplished through establishment of a
special unit to pairo! that area seven days a week. The unit consisting oi two
Office.-s specially trained in the use of tranquilizer and special rescue pro- .
cedures, would inspect all vacant buildings to determine habitation by animals.
Sp°cial screening would be installed in areas where animals could gain access to
the zbandoned houses. �lnimals found straying in the area would be captured by
conventional or specialized meThods. The Officers would also handle related or
routine calls calls within the immediate vicinity of the corridor. Total cost for
- �, � �
SL'o�ECT: Freeway Corridor
D.S � E: ; ebrua:y 19 i°80
, t'�'O
this opera:ion 5as not yet been oete�mined, however our current bzsic hourly
pa:rol costs cre approximately $2D.00 per hour. It is my recommendation that
the Cities of tioru�alk, Downey znd Lynwood approach the Department of
Trar.sport�tion and other app;opr;ate agencies in order to negotiate financ;al
assistance on :his matter. If not, the �citizens of all three communities will
continue to underwrite this special problem area. Based upon the recent Health
Department reports on rabies in our area, a more serious threat of an outbreak
in the corridor is heightened by the unchecked situation. Our existing s.aff
levels and funds from the Cities do not permit the degree of service and
enforcement which will adequately resolve the concerns raised above. SEAACA
, will prepare a more detailed analysis of the problem with further recommenda-
tions to the Cities. Your assistance will be greatly appreciated.
Very sincerely yours,
�
�urk M. Bussiere
BS7B:djw
cc: Honorable William 7. Loehr, Chairman
Honorabie Theodore H. 7ackman, Commissioner
Honorable Arthur F. Gerdes, Commissioner
,� ,�►,
June 17, 1980
T0: THE E[ONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JIM FrEAVER, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: RATE ADJUSTMENT REQUEST BY C.V. DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC.
PURPOSE
To hear the rate adjustment request of C.V. Disposal, Inc. in
accordance with Section 16 of the contract between the Citv and
C.V. Dispasal, Inc. which states: `
SECTION 16. Rate Adjustments. Contractor and City agree
that at the end of each year this contract is in force, the
Contractor and the City shall automatically review this contract
as to its provisions and as to the reasonableness of the fees
charged and assessed thereby, and in furtherance of this review,
Contractor sha11 provide to the City a detailed analysis of its
financial position, which analysis shall be certified to by a
Certified Public Accountant. Consideration for rate adjustments
shall be based on consumer price index and justifiable increase
in dump charges.
ASSUMPTIONS
1. A rate increase is justified.
2. If a justifiable rate increase is not approved, the alter-
native may be a:rebidding of the contract.
' 3. A rebidding is l.ikely to result in higher than existing rates
witr. no guarante�=_ of an improvement in service.
' BACKGROUND
On July 1, 1978, the City of Lynwood and C.V. Disposal, Inc.,
entered into a 5-year. agreement for refuse collection. Section 16
oi the agreement states that C.V. Disposal is eliqible to have
a review of its rates at the end of each year of the contract.
The first review of 1=he contract was scheduled for July, 1979,
but did not occur uni:il December, 1979, due to a delay in closing
and analyzing C.V. D_isposal's account for Lynwood. In the first
review, C.V. DisposaJ_ requested increases of 27 and 33 percent
for residential and <:ommercial services respectively to offset
financial losses on t:he City of Lynwood. The City granted a
16 percent across the� board rate increase to be effective
January service rates could be reviewed again in July, 1980.
The City bills for residential service and C.V. Disposal bills
for commercial servic:e. The City received an overall 10 percent
franchise fee.
! __ .
$ � ;_.. ____
' /Q
�1 �
The attached documer.�t from Mr. Bernie J. Nash, president of C.V,
Disaosal Service, Ir,.c. indicates that the Company has a continuing
loss on the City of Lynwood's account and he has requested a
22o rate increase to be effective in July, 1980.
The Consumer Price Index, which is one basis on which to decide
• rate increases, for January to July 1980 is expected to be
11 percent.
ANALYSIS
The losses which presently occur in C.V. Disposal's financial
statement will not be as severe towards year end when the January,
1980, 16 percent rate increase "Catches up"which the trash
, service. All changes in rates take a certain iead time to effect
any losses due to the City's billing cycles and payment cycles.
C.V. Disposal's costs for commercial trash service is higher than
for residential trash service because of the $240.00 cost for each
3 yd, bin and the added capital costs of a different type of
trash truck. This higher cost was indicated in C.V. Disposal's
' December rate increase for 33 percent. The City granted a 16
percent increase which has failed to cover the higher costs of
commercial service. The difference in the requested and previously
granted rates is 17 percent.
It should be noted that if the Monterey Park landfill closes
down later this year, C.V. Disposal wi11 incur higher costs and
under the current contract, can return for an additional justified
rate increase. Otherwise, any increase now granted will be good
until July 1981.
I£ the City were to approve an 11 percent increase in residental
service the monthly rate would change from $3.38 to $3.75. A
17 percent increase in commercial rates would result in a change
from $33.06 to $38.68 for a typical service.
Staff has surveyed n�iqhboring communities residential rates.
The results were as follows:
Monterey Park $3.45 per month
Cerritos 3.00 " "
Norwalk 5.50 " "
Montebello 3.30 " "
Compton 4.00 " "
E1 Monte 4.65 " "
Bellflower 3.45 " "
Downey 3.40 " "
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council of the City of Lynwood approve an 11 percent
rate increase for re:aidential trash service and a 17 percent
rate increase for commercial trash service effective July 1,
1980, for C.V. Dispo:sal Service and instruct staff to prepare the
necessary documents.,
Attachment
-2-
r� i�
� �/ � ����Y � �� ca'+a rna�.a ��ui
L� M�BRA SOUT11 C�TE
QI]7 9�Mf7! (1757 97�.)�16
D �� lYNW000 U➢1�N0
peCtci[i3fi cit �[t�tLG1P¢� �Q�T/[C? rn�t orea�m ntu veiaese
�aRCO �wITT1ER
:•"b00 �nINTcR aV,NUE �.a.aax nze (ILI l]7.Wy !2177 9u.d9YD
� ��N'� ^= 5�¢!MGS. �:1l�F�RNis ;06i0 wM1T'1E�7. CAI:FCRNIA 906Q5
:iay 2, 1980
Ciey of Lynwood
Lynvood City Ha11
11330 3u11is Rd.
Lynvood, Cali�ornia �k902G2
.1[tencion: '!ayor and C�uneil Per9ans
Subjeet: Refuse Cantrae:
Dear :iayor and Cauneil Pieraons:
C V DISPOSAL Sa"ZiVIC°., IYC, requests permission co aeee vi[h [he admiaistrative
etaff co reviev our proz:Ce and loss for the City of Lynvood.
Ie vas our under�candiag chat vith our negociacie¢s in Oecemher of 19i9,. ae
vould have che oQporcuaii� co reval¢e our ?rofit and loss sc:ucture before July
1, 1980.
A:ter an ezteanive rnvies� of our fiaanc:al statemeacs, ve fiad that we ara forced
�i.h t!�e �roblem of rising exneases beyond our orevious consideracions. T'.ie cost
of labor and pecroleum produets, for examole, have Lae:eased signiP:cancly.
'+e also ynve a sicuatian at hand ia vhich the Ooerating Indssstries laudiill oril!
cloee i[n EaciliCias in .January of 1°81. This ?uts as in a positioa of driving
:venCy-CVO (Z2) mile� fur.ther [o anocher landfill for our vehicles. Sinca this
e:ccra ?2 milea per load :',s exnected, our campany musc canaider [he investaent oE
addicional eauipmenc [o �veec our need� and t:�e needs of cha city.
::e are submiccing our �ei�runry 29, 1980, fiaancial ecacemenc cor ynur consideration.
?c is Laoossible .°or us r.o give you a true representacion of our ooerating revenues
due co bi?ling porce�ures and paymencs :ram c:�e City oi tynwood.
':e are resoec.:uliy reque.eting an increase of taency-cvo perceac (?Z:) ior
reeidencial, �u1c?p1e, ar�d c�mmerelal uni[s. ?his inc:ease vould assist us
3reacly in deeling vic5 ;:he currenc praoiems and a11ov us to racaocure some oi
�ur caoical iavesc�en[s.
I: you ;iave any auestiona, ?lease do not hesitate [o ca11.
'�e oisn co thank you °or your '<iad consideration oi the above, and may ae [ake [':is
�'1 �
� � V ��d �.. �4Y� .�`ii/ `��• �;i.�r�n�oa.. c�t»�ou��
�w �+.eR. �aur» wrE
' i2771 9u.tl9h (11�7 97y1116
a`�D �� �YNMOOD UPI.�HO
' f7BGLQil�U CR �((/(j�2PQl �JQIVCGJ (5171 v!].v�76 Plq 9e1-3L7t
. nONCO wM1TT1ER
��:.604 �41NT�� <VFV�JE o.0.30X ]126 Vl�l m-0]Y (�1]) aV�8911
��H7. =, iP4ING5. GL.FGRNiA ;C670 ��'MIttIE�. GUFCRNIq ?0605
opoortuai[q [o chaak youi for your cansideration of our pase requeats.
Sineernly your�
C V DISPOSAL SERVICE, I:1C.
��
�) �-� ,H.c�..�+� � � � �
3E�."L1RD S. YAS3, ?�
3JN /� / oa
�nc.
!`� �
c�__ - _ ._ , _,, ry
. - -- -a�
�_u_S� __.i... _S .J1I1 YLrJ� JJ y v J�
C:..._�.._��:i� .._...�..i3: t' i i ' ' ^�7
' �i
.�__ :?.'I� � . i5 �, `.ou ,:� � .. .. . ^
��JU JJJ�/�1J 1��/aCO
:..�JI�:i ..3CLi 2i,3�.i 5_��w, 90,809
�, . 2�.57
�.::�� '_:�:.i l� J �.'�i /�'�� �.C�
.. _�^.J��� _.......,�..�.: U�>aJ ii�iai) <^'�i�. V.��
,Ji C _....,�n.�....... ::i _ � i ' !; 1 .
-��+ 9
��.i.:L {Z�JJJ Jl �r� ���� � '
_,�,., 4C.23
' _::.�� C��_3
_�=,.."I: __�:7, '=._ ^-
_ jC? , C?=-_. ^ .1wi ` "o,•-?� -=.,��5 _�,��J .w5
-1''...:.J :�_ ,. 1�'�_�.� __ �. .
' _'.J.� ' i i � ✓ .� � � .�,� .
. _��.... �J�JIy i:i�:�.� 1� j ,',� ?o,�� .
��
�._...._, G:�.....:il.. C"u5i�
C�.-'.`,=:;3:5� 20,343 ZC,'a3 S.
.,,.:� ?n�S 1��� . _,'i�_ �:��11 _S.J��
-..._ _.._..v.:.�J �/J �- ^_ tiJ :O li.��
- -- —� - �: � �' :! SO
_...,. _.,_ _ _.__,.,.. . :, _,� _,:' .
�......, ^� -'� - �7 '�� '!,
'_ ' ^^ ' c:
_,._..� ..�_�_ i�;�..... __ �� ?�'._J
.-.�._..'.. """�_ �n .._.....;� �_�=�� �'=���' �'� %� �.�,.�-
-.._.,� �::??...�� ' •'%o� ' -= -'�e 4��,i'_.�� ??J.��1
-'--- '-..G ..,.'_. (��S`_; ;' °�. ':G' _"� (q1,°�;. i?:.Ct�
_,` �,
I I I { I. 1!' : � I i - .�,_-.. L.
- ' � �
June 17, 1980
T0: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JIM WEAVER, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: LEASING PUMPING RIGHTS
OBJECTIVE
To secure the leasing of additional pumping rights for the
water year 1979-80.
FACTS
The City of Lynwood does not have enough pumping rights
to supply the demand. The City must either lease additional
pumping rights from other purveyors or purchase imoort
water at $105.00 per acre foot from Metro Water District.
Candlewood Country Club will lease 145 acre-feet of water
to the City of Lynwood at $33.00 per acre foot for a total
of $4,785. This water will be extracted by the end of the
current water year, September 30, 1980.
ANALYSIS
In securing a lease from Candlewood Country Club instead
of purchasing from Metro Water District, the City wi11 save
approximately $6,000.
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council of the City of Lynwood approve the water
rights license and agreement between Candlewood Ccuntry
C1ub and the City of Lynwood and authorize the Mayor to
execute the necessary agreement.
Attachment
---- —
i �
. � r:,'.� • -�,,,._. ,
1 -_ .�._ ---_:'.
i
� // �i
� _' _-
` �
•
WATER RIGHT LICENSE AND AGREEMENT
The Candlewood Country Club, hereby grants to the City Of
'Lynwood, California : a license to extract 145 acre feet of
licensor's allowed pumping allocation allocated to licensor
( or predecessors in interest ) under and pursuant to Judge-
ment dated October 11, 1 and entered in Los Angeles
Superior Court Case number 7 86,656, entitled "Central and
West Basin Water Replenishment District vs. Charles E. Adams
' et al ", during the period commencing October 1,.1 and con-
tinuing through September 30, 1 980.
Said License is granted , subject to the following conditions :
(1) Licensee shall exercise said right and extract the same on
behalf of Candlewood Country Club, during the period above
specified and put the same to beneficial use and licensee shall
not by the exercise hereunder of said right acquire any right to
extract water independent of the right of licensor .
(L) Licensee shall pay assessments levied on the pumping and
said ground water by the Central and West Basin Water Replenish -.
ment District .
(3) Licensee shall notify the District and the Watermaster that
said pumping was done pursuant to this license and provide the
Watermaster with a copy of the document .
(4) Licensee shall note, in any recording of water production for
the period of agree ment , that said pumping was done pursuant to
this license .
(5) Licensee'e Allowed Pumping Allocation shall be increased by
the amount hereby leased when computing carry over or allowable
over - extraction as provided by part 111, Subpart A and B, in said
judgment .
Candlewood Country Club, warrants that is has 145 acre feet of
allowed pumping allocation and that it has not pumped and will not
permit or license any other person to pump any part of said 145
acre feet during period October 1,1 through September 30, 1
Dated :
Candlewood Country Club City Of Lynwood, California
Lessor Lessee
By By
Donna Douglas Engene R. Green, Mayor
City Of Lynwood
� _
� �
June 17, 1980
T0: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JIM WEAVER, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 1980-81 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT DEBIT LIMIT REPORT
OBJECTIVE
In accordance with Section 18090 of the Government Code, to
present the annual Street Lighting Maintenance District Report
and to recommend the levying of assessments for the fiscal
1980-81 year.
ASSUMPTIONS
e The levying of assessments to provide for acceptable levels
of lighting, benefits the entire City of Lynwood and is
in the common interest.
• Commercially zoned property, mostly located along arterials
with higher levels of lighting than local streets, receive
more benefit, hence more cost, than residentially zoned
property.
FACTS
The present three year term of the 1978 Street Lighting District,
which was set uo by Resolution No. 78-64 on the 5th day of July,
1978, is entering its third fiscal year. This is a statement
of the past, present, and future expenses and revenues per
indicated fiscal year.
Expenses FY 78-79 FY 79-80 FY 80-81(Est.)
Power 259.128 290,289 360,000
Maintenance/operations 17,809 23,000 27,000
Capital Improvements 0 0 0
Administration 8,152 8,152 10,000
Deficit 41,189 0 0
Subtotal 326,278 321,409 427,000
Revenues
Assessment 426,441 333,093 340,000
Net Total 100,163 11,684 (87,000)
Balance of assessment for three years, 24,847
*Based upon current assessment rate.
-----/�. __._.. �
-1------- ____--- ---___'
�',
. �
The fiscal 1980-81 year estimated expenses, which are listed,
are based upon various expected increases in costs. These
increases include 15% for general items and approximately
25o for power. The power costs are extremely difficult to an-
ticipate due to the possibility of rate schedule changes which
may be granted to the Southern California Edison Company by
the Public Utilities Commission. The capital Improvement
Budqet of $30,000 will allow the City to upgrade some of its
existing street lights and possibly change them to lower power
utilizing lights.
The Street Lighting Assessment is a benefit assessment in which
each parcel within the boundaries of the City of Lynwood is
assessed a certain rate per front foot of £rontage width of
the parcel. The frontage is considered to be the side of the
parcel which has a designated address.
The assessment rates in dollars per foot during this three year
assessment have been and are as follows:
Item FY 78-79 FY 79-80 FY 80-81
Residential property 0.72 0.55 0.55
Commercial property 1.00 1.00 1.00
The 1978-79 assessment recovered a deficit in the street lighting
fund and allowed for a reduction in assessment for the following
1979-80 year. We presently have and expect a small positive
balance in the street lighting fund at the end of the three
year assessment period based upon the current assessment.
This positive balance will be, in accordance with Section
18092.1 of the Government Code, applied to future assessments
to offset ever increasing costs. Therefore, the 1980-81
Street Lighting Assessment is proposed to remain the same as
the 1979-80 assessment.
A diagram of the subject district is attached for reference
as required by Section 18091 of the Government Code.
ANALYSIS
The Street Lighting Assessment District is in the public good
and welfare by providing the funds necessary to maintain a
city-wide lighting system. This city-wide lighting system
enhances safe and convenient use of our street system.
The positive balance which will exist in the Street Lighting
Assessment District Funds, should not, at this time, be used
to lower proposed assessment rates. This is because we anticipate
that future inevitable rising costs will delete a11 surplus
funds within one or two.years. A decrease in assessment rates
this year would then necessitate an increase in assessment
rates next year.
CONCLUSION
The 1980-81 assessment rate should be the same as the 1979-80
assessment rate.
-2-
. � �
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council of the City of Lynwood approve and adopt the
attached resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING THE CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL
REPORT AND AUTHORIZING THE LEVYING OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE
1980-81 LYNWOOD STREET LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT."
Attachment
-3-
, i ,��Z�� � �'�� ` _ � ��� _.� � k I� ).- -- - -- -i ,
J Y�'���{' _ '` ' '��__ tif�� _ — �,,. �- _ - //
�;,'.��,', ' � � �I�� 1��1i_� a����f_l
- ��� -� � .. �' .- - .,,-
-- � � f:- / � J � -
� "�L. :. j ._' Fi tIJ :T Lj �' • l'L { �— T. —�-
--„�' � :6 �.�-- `,—��.�. •E T -- �. ~ , ••. ... \ _•,, � ` . — �.�fi'L�1 " ' .1
'_ pn ��� � y 5,�__�_�_�_O ��'� F��\ �� ��� .. �. ' e I
�-` [�° .. - ._ � � -� J�l ,
�__ �� - �. �- _ � _ - t���
„ ��,� � �.'-'.�� �i��::.M::�; � ��,, �-� .� ��.J (r,�p ��� .
_ " �� . \ _ ..� �� � �`�`��� « `�� �,,�- (� �~ �- ����J�� .
,�J.��-�� I e .. ��''--' • {� .. f ' ! � I , J
F�� •_.` .., ` ,'�. � ���' � I.
,�. _ p :�� ' ���� ,��-
� ' ,�,�L�° t� ` • � - �-., ��l�,j ` � � �,� -•/ - ���� • ;��
_ ���1� -�:_ _\� � fk ���� , ��� ; � . 1 ���
� 'I "_ � � �__.. �
.,r ��', = Y � " . _ _ '�. �'�'�' J c�� ��' _ r -��,. � `.
.,��� = -`� �-- �L�l' ;� ' � . � ��� �'�.��� , �'f �-�:
°�o,�o��,� ' .� �O� J �� �' � • :
-� _ .. �., �' pr��-`J�—J�'l _ � 3.
i -- •�'.a —� �[_J _ =*•�� �� ��.
. r� > �3
' � a z �E����� ��;_- ,. ,
� , �� � � ����' �JI e� ,,
i LF � ��...„„ �;__ .� .
o � .„ -' s ^� `f/ q �
� � ►dd — � .., p 9 :. ., ..' .�r. d] _� �
� �' A � — - J �� Y � �- ' �. r / .1 � j�.. � �
� � , � _ _ � � �: � _ ������_X��
# ._,� _ _ -
"_, _ �-- -� r. „_�.
� �r � �� — �"��Y -',�- J� �° 'c ."-n� �.. � �.-., •
� � ...�. LUEfl6 �� �'J � ;b (.��... p . I , I
7L --_ ��-� .,�:� . r-
--_ _ �YNw � .., �5�-3; �--.._,_ 1� ,.
� -�.-at o00 ` -. � �' -:. `� . � „- �. .
• CALIFORNIA `! g,� �� � Jf� -.. �� ��^,;�
ZONINO MAP �-;I.�I• 11 r�
u . , � 11 . .; C
�__._____..____._____________ __.-_ _. _____.____ ___..._____.._____-_ . _ _ _ . __ ... _ _ . ;.
or�cRn�� or sTR�cz� r.rctrrtN�
MniN�r�NnNCr DrsTarc•r
1978-1981
NOTI:: 1.. All. publ.icly owned properties are assessment exempt.
" 2. F'or. .information on ]ines and dimensions of cach Iot or. parcc�l, refer to i�Jrin 197(3-A
. ancl Coun(_y ns�;�ss�r's Maps on file wilh thc City Clcrk.
. � � �C � -�'
RESOLUTION N0. 80-53
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD APPROVING THE CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT
AND AUTHORIZING THE LEVYING OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE
1980-81 LYNWOOD STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
WHEREAS, The City Council o£ the City of Lynwood
established the Street Lighting Maintenance District by
Resolution No. 78-64 on the Sth day of July 1978 for a period
of three years; and
WHEREAS, said Street Lighting Maintenance District
was formed in accordance with the provisions of the Street
Lighting Act of 1919, Section 18000, Division 14, of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the annual assessment report has been filed
with the City Council of the City of Lynwood, known as the
fiscal year 1980-81 Street Lighting Assessment District Debit
Limit Report, as required by the a£orementioned act; and
WHEREAS, said report has recommended an assessment
rate for residentially zoned property at $0.55 per front foot
of frontage and commercially zoned property at $1.00 per
front foot of frontage;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED
by the City Council of the City o£ Lynwood that:
SECTION 1: The fiscal year 1980-81 Street Lighting
' Debi t Limit Report is aoproved as submitted.
SECTION 2: The fiscal year 1980-1981 Street Lighting
maintenance District assessment shall be $0.55 and
$1.00 per front foot of frontage for residentially
and commercially zoned properties respectively.
SECTION 3: Al1 Federal, State, County, and City
publicly owned lands are assessment exempt.
SECTION 4: The City Clerk of the City of Lynwood
is hereby ordered to transmit to the County Tax
Collector the aforementioned report and a certified
copy of this resolution upon which the levy is based
and said County Tax Collector is hereby authorized
and directed to make collections of all such assessments,
, and to perform all the acts and duties as are required
of said Act.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of
,TiiNF 1980. ��
EUGENE R. GREEN, Mayor
City of Lynwood
ATTEST:
Z,aURENE COFFEY, City C1erk
City of Lynwood
'� ,°°
TO: The Aonorable(�bl and Members of the City Council
FROM: Irwin Seligei�;'''�conomic Development and Grants Coordinator
DATE: June 17, 1980
SUBJECT: 9doption of Resolution Approving HUD FY 1980 Innovative
Grant Application for a Community Energy Conservation Project.
OBJECTIVE:
To request City Council approval for applicationforfunds through the
Department of Housing and Urban Development's FY 1980 Innovative Grant
Program, Acquisition of funds will enable staff to develop and im-
plement a city-wide residential and commercial weatherization/
retrofittir�g grant program, known as Project ERGS (Energy Retrofit
Grant Subsidies).
ASSUMPTIONS:
It is assumed that it is in the City's best interest to vigorously
develop a comprehensive energy conservation project. This assump-
tion is.coupled with an appreciation for the City's commitment to-
ward upgrading and revitalizing residential and commercial neighbor-
hoods.
FACTS:
(1) In rebruary 1980, HUD announced a competition for FY:1�J80 Innovative
Grants to support community related energy conservation programs.
(2) HUD is soliciting applications for projects which will utilize
proven energy co�servation activities in local community and economic
�evelopment activities. Approximately $200,000 would be requested from
HUD to implement Project ERGS. The project would be supported 1000
by federal funds.
(3) By utilizing grants as financial incentives, it is anticipated
that such techniques will stimulate greater citizen awareness and
activity directed toward energy conservation. This, in turn is
eYpected to aid in the City's continuing endeavor to arrest residen-
tial and commercial blight.
ANALYSIS:
It has been determined that an appropriate project for Lynwood under
the HUD Ineovation Grant Program would be one entailing the awarding
of grants to homeowners and small businesses for the purpose of assisi-
ing these residents in v and retrofitting their properties.
� it would be in the best economic and social interest of the
City to implement Project ERGS in so far as it would indicate closer
movement toward achieving its overall goal of upgrading Lynwood's
housing stock and commercial areas.
RECC�IMENDATION:
Staff recommends the adoption of a resolution by the City Council
authorizing submission of an application for funds available through the
Department of Housing and Urban Development's FY 1980 Innovative
Grant program for Community Energy (;onservation,
3 �� .-._- _
' _-----'
a
� - ;
� .,
; ___ r
� ---
--------------- - - ?
•
•
RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD •AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION.
FOR FUNDS AVAILABLE. THROUGH THE, DEPARTMENT. OF
HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT'S FY. 1980 INNOVATIVE
GRANTS FOR COMMUNITY ENERGY CONSERVATION.
WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States has passed
the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, which is administered
bythe Department of Housing and Urban Development; and •
•
WHEREAS, Section 107 (a) (4) provides for financial and
financial assitance; and
WHEREAS, the Office of the, Assistant Secretary of Community_. •
Planning.and Development is soliciting proposals for competition in
• FY 1980 Innovativ.e Grants for, Community Energy Conservation, pursuant
•
to the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; and -
WHEREAS, the City of Lynwood is eligible to enter into such
. an agreement and receive such financial assitance; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lynwood has an acute need to develop an
energy conservation grant program for residential and commercial.
areas.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council. of
the City of Lynwood approves authorizing the submission. of an
application for funds available through the Department of Housing
and Urban• Development's FY 1980 Innovative Grants for Community.
Energy Conservation program,. to develop and implement a residential
and commercial energy, retrofitting grant subsidy program.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of June, 1980.
Mayor,.City of Lynwood
ATTEST:
•
City Clerk, City of Lynwood.
•
� v�'*,
�
�'� �
T0: The Honorabl� YI$yor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Irwin Selige'f','v Economic Development and Grants Coordinator
DATE: June 17, 1980
SLBJECT State HCD Loan Application
OBJECTIVE:
The objective of this action is to approve submission of a proposal
to the State of California Department of Housing and Community De-
velopment for funding under the Deferred Payment Rehabilitation Pro-
gram for City r.esidents.
ASSUi�4PTI0N :
It is assumed that the funding of an additional Deferred Payment Re-
habilitation Program is in the best interest of the City in that it
would expand the current level of assistance to local residents.
FACTS:
(1) The Deferred Payment Rehabilitation Loan Program was established
by the Passage of SB966 in 1978. The program provides deferred payment
loan funds to local agencies that operate rehabilitation programs.
The program is designed primarily to assist with the rehabilitation of
housing for low-and moderate-income households.
(2) The Deferred Payment Rehabilitation Program is administered by
the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).
The HCD is currently soliciting proposals for use of their available
funds for the Deferred Payment Rehabilitation Loan Program. A proposal
has been prepared, which would request expansion of the City's present
deferred loan capabilities by $150,G00 through the State Deferred
, Payment Rehabilitation Loan Program. This additional program funding
uould increase the City's current reYiabilitation program by 20% and allow
many residents to be helped who might otherwise have been turned away
due to the unavailability of additional loan funds.
ANALYSIS:
Participation in this new program would increase the City's RPh2bili-
tation Program b,y $150,000. The assistanceto City residents lvauld be
great due to this 20% expansion of the City's program.
RECO�IyENDATION :
That the City Council of the City of Lynwood adopt the attached reso-
lution.
:. -_. i
j //� - 3
; _ �" �
�
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION
FOR FUNDS AVAILABLE THROUGH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of California has
approvedche Deferred - Payment Rehabilitation Loan Fund, which is ad-
ministered by the State Department of Housing and Community De-
velopment; and
WHEREAS, Sections 50660 -50670 of the California Health
and Safety Code provide for financial assistance; and
WHEREAS, under the execution of the governor, HCD is
soliciting proposals for financial assitance pursuant to regulations
Chapter 7, Subchapter 5, Sections 7400 -7436; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lynwood is eligible to comply with
such regulations and receive such financial assistance; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lynwood has an acute need to
expand funding for the City's Rehabilitation Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City
Council of the City of Lynwood approves authorizing the sub-
mission of an application for funds available through the State
of California Department of Housing and Community Development to
expand the funding of the City's Rehabilitation Program.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of June, 1980.
Mayor, City of Lynwood
ATTEST:
City Clerk, City of Lynwood
•
� �
DATE: June 17, 1980
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUDICIL
FROM: C.R. Johnston, Director of Housing and Community Development
SUBJECT: S�CTION 8 EXISTING RENTAL UNITS
PURPOSE: The purpose of this action is to support an application,
as filed by the Los Angeles County f3ousing Authority, for an
additional one nundred and eighty four (184) Section 8 Existing
Rental Units from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development. Such 184 units are to be allocated throughout the
County of Los Angeles.
FACTS: The Section 8 Program is designed to assist 1ow and very
low income residents obtain safe and decent housing. A qualified
resident is required to pay 25% of their income as rent, with the
remainder paid by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Devel-
opment. Maximum allowable rents are established by HUD. At this
time, there is a demand for an additional six hundred (600) Sec-
tion 8 assisted units in the City.
The local Housing Authority administers the Section 8 Program for
HUD. The City of Lynwood has authorized the Los Angeles County
Housing Authority to act as the Housing Authority for the City of
Lyr.wood .
The City of Lynwood's Housing Element, of its General Plan, states
that the City is committed to "assuring the availability of hous-
ing for all persons, regardless of age, race, sex, marital status,
ethnic background, source of income or other arbitrary factors."
In addition, the City guarantees "the provision of housing stock
which is structurally sound, absent of health or life endangering
problems, containing sufficient space for the inhabitants and
within the economic means of the inhabitants,"
, The Section 8 Existing Rental Unit Program has been operated by
the County Housing Authority, within the City of Lynwood for a
number of years. There are currently 254 Section 8 assisted units
existing within the City. This program has assisted many families
over the years, who would otherwise not be able to obtain decent
and safe housing.
A full breakdown of assisted family characteristics is attached
:�ereto.
A??ALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: The Section 8 Existing Rental Unit
Assistance Program has been in operation within the City o£ Lynwood
for several years. This program has assisted many families in
need of decent and safe housing, with absolutely no adverse e£fect
upon the community. By Housing Authority estimates, there are
over 600 families within the City of Lynwood in need of such
assistance. An allocation of additional Section 8 units will allow
the City of Lynwood to meet its Housing Goals as set forth in its
Housir.g Element of its General Plan.
RECONu�tEC7DATION: It is recommended that the City Council request
the b]ayor to send a letter to the Department of Housing and Urban
Development supporting the Los Angeles County Housing Authority's
application and assuring them that the application is consistent
with the City's Housing Assistance Plan.
,
; . _.... . _.._-, �
;
i
' �� �
� ---- - .. ____� :
'- --- __.__ _.._.. _ __., .__......---1.
� �
THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF T}iE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
4800 BROOKLYN AVENUE • ?.O. BOX 2201 8
LOS ANGEL<5. C.1LIFORNIA �0022
tzi3� Zsa-�zzo
DAVIO G. 5'_LSWORTH. CHAIRMaN GEORGE M. JAMES
3C4R0 CF CO.NhI1551CM1ER5 _XECLITIVE JI :°_CTO:
p� .
. I�ay 1� � I`.'8Q C��/ n.-. _...
.fIP�.� ._ .. : ..
C� I Y ��/I'ril>� �,���...
OFFICE
;T�PI: OEPAR'?�E;`�T OF COMP?UNITY OEVELCPMENT, DEPARTMEPIT OF PL,;PINItJG
OR RECE'dELOPSIEVT AGEilCY �
Cear 'r.onor�ble:
-ne -,ousing Autncri�y cr the County o� Los Angel2s has applied to the Depar±-
,�en� of 'cusina and Urban Dev='opment (4UD) �or an allocaticn of one nundred
=i5nty-four (1°4)existine rer,tal uni u under :he provisions or Sec=ion �
o' the 'r.eusir,c ard Ccrmurity Oevelopmen* Act of ??74. Considerina that
cot2ntial applicants �or this oroaram may oe residents or �rour corrmuni;.y,
NUQ is reGuestinc a ietter or support ror ihe application. 9rieriy, tne
lzt:er shculd indics�e �nat tnis a?plicatir,n is consis:ent �.vith your
Housing ?ssistanca ?'.an `or Seciion 8 Program Goals `or 1430-81.
r. SUCyES=°_^_ i01'.^,IdC t0!" =�2 12tt?f 15 di,LdCh2'� '0" ,y0U1' Y°_'/1E'�! dfld CCI1S1C8Y3-
.':cn. Tne lettar shouid be sianed by the G?ayor or Chier Administrative officer
and r�:ur•ned direc�ly co ;;UC, with a copy co the 'r,'ousing Authoricy. The leiter
sncuic he ��ir=c_e� �o:
�"^.r. Rcbert Si=rr
Cn�zr, ^ul=i`amily Hcusina �ivi;icn
�?�d7'�^2^= Oi „CUSiIIC 3fG :,'!'Cdit no��ol�nner�r
Z�i,C '';;i'snir� 31id.
Los Ang2les, CA :CO57
.' fCU ^3`/2 3f1,� qU25i.1Of15, �I�d52 CCl1L3Ct �3�Y'1C13 i'iili9l" 3L �21.�J� �54-%�=�,
'.Y=., � f1d'1k1�G y0U ��, 3CV2(iC°_ r01' y0U1' COO��t'3Li0(1.
Sinc2r�ly,
.=0R6c ��9. JAAi__ �
��=;tOCULiv� Gir�C=or
���:u : �'''.' : ? �;
:.l'C.:SJr°_
� �
�Fa�T
oar�
SuGGcS , � � � �� ; a�Mar
t4r. �aherr St3rr
Cnief, �^.ultiramily 'r'ousing Division
Oepartnent or Housing and Urban t7evelooment
2500 lJilshire 31vd.
Los Anceles, CA 90057
Re: SEC?i0M 213 LETTER
RUD ReTerenc2: 9. 2 HOH
The �cusing .�uthority or ihe County or Los Angeles Application �cr 18G
�ection 8 Existing Rzntal units
�ear :`1r. Starr:
Pursuant to ihe notic� or� r"unds availability, dat2d April 1, I980, the Nousing
-utnority or tne County of Los Angeles nas apolied r"or one hundred and 2ighty-
'our �13a) units under the Section 8 cxis�ing Housing Prooram. A portion oT
these units may oe allocated through the Housino Authorit� �or our jurisdic-
=ion.
The aoplica�ion is censistent wiih our Housing Assistanc2 ?1'an and urge your
'a�roraoi2 rospons2 ror this aoolication.
Sincereiy,
�' �
THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
4800 BROOKLYN AVENUE • P.O. BOX 2201 $
LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90022
(273) 264-7220
DAVID G. ELLSWORTH. CHAIRMAN
9CARD cF CO'AMISSIONERS GEORGE M. JAMES
EXECIJTNE pIRECTOR
June 9, 1980
i1r. Rocky Johnston
Director, Department of
Housing and Community Development
City of Lynwood
11330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, CA 90262
Re: Section 8- Existing Housing Program
Dear Mr. Johnston:
Per your telephone request, regarding the housing services provided to the
residents of Lynwood, a family characteristics breakdown of the recipients
is attached for your review. A total of 254 residents are receiving Section
8 housing assisiance as of June 1, 1980. Of the 254, nine (9) are handicapped.
As you will note, these figures surpass the Housing Assistance Plan goals and
objeciives for 1979-1980 for the City of Lynwood.
'Ne anticipate your cooperation in supporting the application to HUD for 184
units of Section 8 housing. If we can be of further assistance, do not hesi-
tate to call.
Sincerely,
George M. James,
Executive Director
i
;�.��,� �C/��_l�r���_
Diane U. hcNeel
Director of HAPP
Enclesure
DVM:Ip
;
� �
Section 8- Existing Housing Program
Housing Authority of the County
of Los Angeles
Program Services to the City of Lynwood, CA
(Reported as of �une 1, 1980)
Total recipients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254
I. Head of Household
a. Females . . . . . . . . . . . 240
b. Males . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Tota 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 254
II. Family Type
a. Elderly . . . . . . . . . . . 46
b. Small Family . . . . . . . . . 164
c. Large Family . . . . . . . . . 44
Tota 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 254
tII. Racial and Ethnic Breakdown
a. '�Jhi te . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
b. Black . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
c. American Indian . . . . . . . 1
d. Hispanic . . . . . . . . . . . 21
e. Asian . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . 254
i'/. Handicapped
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
� ,�
DATE: Sune 17, 1980
T0: HONORABLE i�7AY0R AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: C.R. Johnston, Director of Housinq and Community Development
SUSJECT: SECTION 8 MODLRATE REHABILITATIODl PROGRAM
PURPOSE: The purpose of this action is to support an application,
as filed by the Los .Angeles County Housing Authority, for four
hundred and nine (409) Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Units
from the U.S. Department of Housing ar.d Urban Development.
�ACTS: The Section B Program is designed to assist low and very
low income residents obtain safe and decent housing. A qualified
resident is required to pay 25% of their income as rent, with the
remainder paid by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Devel-
opment. Maximum allowable rents are established by, HUD. At this
time, there is a dem,and for an additional �ix hundred (600) Sec-
tion 8 assisted unit:; in the City.
The local Housing Authority administers the Section 8 Program for
HUD. The City of Ly:nwood has authorized the Los Angeles County
Housinq Authority to act as the Housing Authority for the City of
Lynwood.
The City of Lynwood';s Housing Element, of its General Plan, states
that the City is corrunitte3 to "assuring the availability of hous-
ina for all persons, regardless of age, race, sex, marital status,
ethnic background, source of income or other arbitrary factors."
In addition, the City guarantees"'the provision o£ housing stock
which is structurallp sound, absent of health or life endangerinc
problems, containing sufficient space for the innabitants and
within the economic means of the inhabitants."
The Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Program assists rental
property owners in maintaining their property so that it is
structurally sound and absent of health or life endangering
problems. The Section 8 Program guarantees that decent, safe and
sound housing is madE=_ available to families who would not other-
wise be able to afford such housing.
A full fact sheet regarding the Section 8 NIoderate Rehabilitation
Program is attached hereto.
ANALYSIS AND CO�TCLUS:CO:d: A windshield survey of existing rental
housing within the C:Lty o£ Lynwood has shown a number of properties
in need of rehabilitation assistance. �xisting City programs
have little money av�silable for such properties. The City of
Lynwood has many low income residents who are in need o£ additional
living space. Both i.he r.eed for property imprevement and additional
low cost living space^ can best be served bl City participation in
the Section 8 hIOderat:e Rehabilitation Prvgram.
RECOtM�]ENDATIOtJ: It i_s recommended that *_he City Council request
the Mayor to send a letter to the Department of HoLSing and Urban
Development supporting the Los Angeles Ccunty Housing Authority's
application and assui-ing them that the application is consistent
with the City's Housi.ng P.ssistance Plan.
��
� �
THE HOUSiNG AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
4H00 EIROOKLYN AVENUE • P.O. BOX 2207 S
L_OS ANGELS. CAUFORNIA 9OOZZ
(21 3) 2647220
OAVIO G. ELLSWOR7H. CHAIRMAN
3CARD OF CCMMISSIONERS GEORGE M. JAMES
°_XECUTIVE OIRECTOR
May 19, 1980
l;ity of Lynwooa
11i30 �uliis Road
Lynwood, CA y02ti2
Aii`J: CCMP4UNIT'( OE'lELOPMENT �EPARTi�1ENT PLAPdP�IIVG DEPARTME��T, OR
2EDEVELOPMEhlT AGENCY
Dear "1ayor Green:
Tne Housing Authority oT the Cou�ty of Los Anaeles is applying to
the Depar*.ment or" nousirig and Urban Devetopment (HUO) for an additional
' allocation of four nundr=d and nine (�09) units under the Section 8
i4oderate 4enaoilitation Program. ;�s participants in �his program may
be resldents of your a�mmunity, the Department of HUO has requested that
you ind9cate to them iha.t this application is consistent with your Housing
assi5tance Plan, Sectior� 8 Existing or Settion 8;toderate Rehabilitation
Goals.
Since the Authoritq's aF•olication must be filed wi�h the Department of
,ousing and Ur4an Develaoment hy `1ay 30, 1980, your prompt response will
be aporeciated. "Sve nave enclosed a suggested letter fornat for your
consideration in meeting the HU� request.
Tne let.er snould be signed by the Hayor or Cnief Administrative Qffiicer
and r2turned to HU� directly with a copy to the rousinn Authority. I�
you nave sny a,ues�ions, please contact Tad `limura at ?'o4-i220 ext. 251.
Your cooperation is most aporaciated in neloing us to `uifiil the demand
;or :his �ruch needed housing assistance.
Sincerely,
�'': i' .
�'cOR6c ,N. JAMES
Executive Director
G4�:^1:ev
=^closure
!.. �. E..i . . I . .
-. � �
�RAFT
SUG6ESTED Lc:?ER �ORMAT
DATE
Mr. Terry 0. Zellhart
Ceputy Director of Multifamily Housina Oivision
Deoart:nent of Housing & Urban Development
2500 ',Ji 1 shi re Bl vd.
Los Anaeles, CA 90057
Re: Section 213 Lettier
Dear Mr. Zellhart:
In response *_o the notice of `unds zvailabilit� daied Aoril 1, 1980> the
Housina Authority of the County oT Los Angeles has submitted an application
for `our hundred and nine (409) units under the Section 8 hoderate Rehabili-
*_ation Program. A portion of ihese units may be allocated throuoh the
4ousina Authority to our jurisdiction.
The applicaiion is consistent with our Housing Assistance Plan and we
urge your favorable consideration of this application.
Sinc=rely,
� �
i1�iE MODE't�1E ��BILITATIC�! PROGRPM
(F SH tE�i
',�NAT IS TfiE �hODERAIE R�-IABILITATICN ?ROGP�1'1 ?
Tne Moderate Rehabilitation Program provides for improvements to existinq Housing
Units and 4ousing Assistance Payments on bena]f oT low income families leasing
these units.
Tne proaram is administered by the Housing Authori�y of the County or Los .4ngeles
(FACoL.4) �.aithin the unincorporated areas or" Los Angeles County and its 46
participating cities.
�IGIBI F �2VITS ?
In order to qualify the unit(s), the rollowing minimum conditions must oe met:
1) The unit(s) must be located within the jurisdiction or" the Housing
Authority County of !os Anaeles.
Z) Tne unit(s) must be vacant, or occupied by a*.enant(s) who can me=t
the Section °�" nousing program occupancy standards and income limitations.
3) ine unit(s) must be substandard and require a minimum improvements cost
of 41,000 per unit and be economically feasible within the Fair '�arket
Rent allowed ror the program, with nigner r=nts allowed in certain cases.
I
d) Permanent displacement or tenant;s) will not be aliowed
BE��EFI i S 10 C�!VERS ?
=or participating ir t`e program, the owner may realize the r"ollowing benef�ts:
?) �ossibili�y or receivina a low interest rehabilitation loan from the
Couniy or City wnich the owner(s) would be compensated through ihe 4AP
�cntract (CHFA 9o, leveraged `inancing (CDBG; i 3/40 or lower, and
various HUD-�HA nome improvemeni programs).
=i �OSS 1�l i 1 L'J Ot recei vi ng d�Y3f1*_ iT'Offl :h2 Cl .f t0 P°_dUCO �^°hdD 1 � l i,dtl0�
cos� or do site imvrovements. Grants do not nave to oe paid back (check
tvi*_n various cities
3; i� the owner is having a niah turn over; the lone i�rm contract �NOUId
add sta6ility to the unit or comolex. (Cerii�ication of eligibility
:ied to tne unit and not to the �znant. �his should discourage un-
necessary moves Sy tne :znan� and ke_p maintenance cos�s down.)
=j '�0(!IpE!15dL'•0(1 �0 `h2 OWI10Y' OT :h8 HF�P c�ntrac Si.3Y'`.5 Ofl th2 Bff2Ct'V2
Cate o� the :=AP contrac� �,vnether tne unit is cccupied or not, provided
::�a: :he �;ous�ng =uthori=y is unabl2 �o leas2 tne unit wi`hin 15 days
sr_er �AP ecncrsct execution. ?he owner is entitled to 20°� or' 'the contrac=
���r, =pr uo to 5u day<_ !:'rora_2 rumher or days vacant).
� ,.,�
-z-
5) Section 167(k) of the iR5 code will a71ow the owners to compute the
depr=ciation deduction under the straight line method usino a useful
life of 60 months (accelerated depreciation) (check with your CPA).
6) 'he owner(s) may be able to Rehabiiitate a standard unit (Oecent, safe
and sanitar,i or within Housing Quality Standards) if the unit has a
major syst=m or component in danger of `ailing.
1) An eliaible tenant will auiomatically be able to participate in the
program, ir" unit qualifies.
8) �lo loss or" rent to the owner while the rehab. is being completed,
sinc� most of the rehab. work will be comple*ed wi*_h the tenant in
place (no permanent displaczment).
9) ;ssistances availabie to owner(s) ootaining Contraciors, lenders,
c000eration `rom cit� building inspectors, and for temporary relocation.
10) dwner(s) not prohibited from selling his or ner property, however,
contrac� will transfer with sale of propert�.
OT}iER ADDITICNA,L BEIFFITS ( S,�'E ,4S SECTIC� "8" E!ISTI";G 1-0USI�IG PRC��PJ�1)
?. Guarant�e monthly 7AP payrient.
2. Guarantee vacancy c�mpensation (30%)
3. Guaraniee damage compensation (Z months contract)
4. Possibility or annual rent increase (AAF)
�. Guarantee tenant referrals.
6. Paper work done by HACoLA (HAP contract, 12ase, etc.)
7. Since ienanis' portion or the rent is low, owner(s) would have an
easier time collecting the tenants portion.
3. �nnual inspection and tenant counseling.
For r�ore infornation, pieas2 contact:
TYE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CCUNTY OF LOS ANGcLE�
-'800 =ast 3rooklyn ,4venue
Los Angeles, Cd 90022
?hone: (213) 254-7220
aSK ; OR THE '10DERATE REr',ABILITATIOP! STAFF
� �
BASIC ROLES PND R,ESPOPaSIBILITI�S OF PARTICIPATING PARTIES
OF SECTION 3 P'fODERATE RF}�ABILITATIO�J PRCGRPM
OUTRFACH
HOUSING AUTHORITY- The Authority will solicit owner participation for the program
through a Public Notice/Request for Proposals, and full information about the Moderate
Rehabilitation Program will be provided in an owner's packet. Also, program explanations
will be given to lenders, contractors, and cities for their participation.
P, 'RGPOSALS
Owners-Owners will be requested to complete the owner proposal format describing the
unit(s),deFiciencies, rehabilitation cost, and tenant/family composition and their
income.
HOUSING AUTHORITY-The Authority will review proposals for compliance with basic program
requirements and determine ttie feasibility of the preposals. Units(s) determined
eligible will be scheduled for initial inspection for cost analysis.
IVSPECTICdVS
HOUSI�G AU?HORITY-The initial, on=going, and final inspection will be completed by the
Authority's inspector.
Cities/County-City or county inspectors may work in conjunction with Authority's
inspector.
Owners/7enants-Owners and tenanis wiii be requesied to be present during ihe initial
inspection.
DEiERMINATION OF TENAMS/FAMILY ELIGIBILITY
HOUSING AUTHORITY-After the Authority has selected feasible proposals, the Eligibility
Staff will schedule interviews with the selecied owners' present tenants. The Authority
will follow its' Section 8 Existing Housing intake procedures, which requir2 that
letters specifying documentation to be brought to the interview be sent to applicants.
Scheduling of interviews to be conducted, verification completed, and eligibility
determined in accordance with the procedures set forth by the Section 8 Existing Housin9
Program.
Tenants-Tenants who wish to participate in the proaram are requested to cooperate svith
the �ligibiiy star"fi, providing all necessary documents to det=rmine their eligioility
for the program.
FI PdA1�JC I NG
Owners-it will be ihe responsibiliiy of the owner to obtain �he rehaoilitation loan.
However, when possible the Authority will assist owners if they are unable to `ind suitable
financing.
HOUSING AUTHORITY-As well as providing assistance to owners, the Authority will provide
information regarding available financing from local lending institutions and low interest
rehabilitation r"inancing available to owners *_hrough the l.os Angeles County Communiiy
Development and the various participating cities.
_-25-30
. .. I ... i . . � . .
� �Z� 1
SFI F('TION OF A CONTRACTOR,
Owners-I� will be the responsibility of the owner to obtain a contractor. However,
the Authority will assisi owners, if they are unable to find a suitable contractor.
The owners will be required to obtain three bids.
HOUSING AUT40RITY-To help owners select a contract, the Authority will provide a list
or approved contractors. (OWNERS WILL NOT BE REQUIRED TO USE THE LIST). Owners who
pr000se io use coniractors not on the list will have to obtain approval in advance
�rom the authority.
Contractors-Since most of the rehabilitation will be completed with tenants in place,
contractors will be requested to take special precaution to avoid damage to the tenant
prooerty, and disruption of the tenant's normal routine.
FXFCL'TION OF AGR�'EM
HOUSING AUTHORITY-Afier the owner has completed all of the steps required before
rehabilitation can begin, tfie Authority will prepare the agreement to enter into a
HAP contract.
The Authority's and the owner's rights and responsibilities under the terms of the
agreement and contract will be fully explained, and the importance of timely and
correct completion of work will be emphasized.
P�IABILITATION
HOUSING AUTHORITY-The Authority will monitor the rehabilitation progress and correct
comaletion throuah *_he fnspection orocess.
Owners-Owners will be reouested to monitor the rehabilitation work, if possible,
for timely and correct completion.
Tenants-Tenants will be requested to cooperate with contractors, owners and the
Authority so that rehabilitation can be completed in a timely manner.
�� ��`��
HOUSING AUTHORITY-After ail the required items are completed within the terms of the
agreement and the regulations of Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Program, the
Authority will execute the HAP Contract. With the execution of the HAP contract,
tenants will start to receive subsidy and the owner will receive HAP payments.
. . EXHIBIT I
� �
ScCTION 8 EXISTING FMR'S (EFFECTIVE �}-26-8Q)*
0-BR. 1- BR. 2-BR. 3-BR. I 4-BR. 5-BR
S�al 529� g343 342? 5509 a585
I � ��
I MOD. REHAB F'1R S( 120;o OF EXISTING) *
IO-BR. 1-BR. 2-BR. 3-BR. 4-BR. i 5-BR.
I 5289 L 53a9 i 5412 � 5512 5611 � 5702
I
MOD. REHAB FMR'S lOq ABOVE MOD. REHAB. (132°a OF EXISTING)*
0-BR. 1-BR. � 2-BR. 3-BR. I 4-BR. 5-BR.
3318 5384 � 5453 3564 I �572 �?772 �
i
� MOD. REHAB FMR'S 20i ABOVE MOD. REHAB. (144a OF E;(ISTIiV6)*
0-BR. 1-BR. 2-BR. 3.3R. 4-BR. 5-BR.
i S3n7 I 5�}1a 5494 5615 5733 5842
I
I
�
I ANPIUAL INCOME �IMITS *
a
� jNO. PERSONS IN FAMILY LOWER INCOME VERY L041 INCOME
i 1 S 10,550 3 6,600
I Z 12,050 7,500
3 13,550 8,450
I 4 15,050 9,400
5 16,000 10,150
' ( 16,900 10,900
7 17,850 11,650
I 8+ 18,800 12,400
�
ACC- ALL FOR FAMILIES *
i
i0-BR. 1-BR. 2-BR. 3-BR , 4-3R. 5-BR.
j a a 263 52 7 �
�
TOTAL �2� UNT_TS _
< cuo;ect �o chanae acccrdinn *o rUG reguia:ions
•
. i 0
•
c
. P
i z r
So a
E ❑ E. • i --- , 0 S V
0 C
I W
r _ CC
z F F W
to 0 Z t -
I I . ' < G 4 0
i N E • Z <
0 - Z 3 F L
c r• 0 4 ' z' .z. co
o -- ' Z P
Ss- CZ 3 - 0 W
o 6
V. 2 _ P I 2 b E. I 2 F U U < E. !. W
..7 W 2 [a. O i O 2 W F- W
4 U U ' E. W = U :• G 0. S
1 = < W W 4 4 .. O E F.
, G - G' W F E 0 2 E G G • co . W G
C G= W W < 1 [] 0 Co Z : Co • C.
E - Z F < 0 0. G E ❑ W < - I Z' es 0
0 W < G F-, 4 < W W 5 G I < O
F U 3 - E p U U G G. = E I 4 U
i
I 1
I
• • • • • •, I • • • • 4. • •' •
• .II V In dM Ln r- Vl V ■ O tom '. O .M10 PP (V M1. in . . • o < O. T V1 10 1 10 A b1 V C. N N O
F - N y O' 0 C1 NI M tom .•. N N W
01 0}r \ r -r - r' ,6 'O -ri ce M !. M N .. .0 N CU
0 O - .•
•
II 2 0 0' O N" M -w U1'. co P M1 = I. . M N r i
M M P1 M M, N N M ! O U1 N 10
I
111 i p ail
u
-
i
II
C I
o 1 1
.
I
AGENDA ITEM 1
7
PINIIIII
I
•
II OO * p C • C • • . pp O • p • • • CC •
I �0 8' 8 O O S O C
O
O ;
I LL y - •
,II Sr,
�I
O .
0
1 ° • * * S . • •• • •- •
O 8 O S O' O O. O O
I jE.
0
_ I • • • • • • • • i
I I 0 0 0 0 o o o •
o 0 0 0 o S g 0 0
I
• �
0 .. g O8 Oo ''. O8 g O8 0 o
ir •
O Yr
M
I F
S . O S O a S 1 1 S S •
P N
i P
4 b n-
.
I • • • •• • • • S •
I S S ;it:
O
EI t W 1 2 0 2 C I .
I I F 2 H = t ti C I J
O C N J 2 = _ -O i O 0 J J y r 42 0 W W CO 2 0 0 1 t9
O: 3' O C .E O 4-1 I 2'
O. Lha W C 0 W t
x x ¢
ti 2 N 0 0 co I O O
N W y C C 0 N
I > > > y x X: 0 a
•, • • • • • • a •
enr
1 Li w a Gt N N
1 ; c
N a N 2 N N 2 2
I 1 2 i ,G v+ 1^ 4.4 r 0 N J
_ —_ O C I . 0 r. O O 1 � N N 1
J M1 c o f 4 n
IA P
v � a, r • w Cr N 01 =
!' I!
' 1R' f I e .-T 0 I .e
O '. 0 n O( O G O o o
c a. 0 C e
II
1 It
IL
Z
.- N 2 .- 2 r A I • m
0. ^ f. J N M1 fy I- C' N.
• G-, i O a^ c G O - 1
C C C t ¢ il
- N
O e \ 1C w W I 1f \ I f
c.
4:M1Mriliai' .
- lair MLitt a T
• P-77.
Ii Lk' ¢ O O O O '4 v c, 8 S O O S C O S' O O C O O O O S O
C O 8
II o - r
o j
II x 0 0 N .° N 0 e - C •
V N
M N' CV C. r
0 N • • N In
° o N r -. ¢ M - M c c N
o • p • . ' • C •• � • •• • ' • • C * ' t •• • . • • • • • ' •• • • c • • • * t • • ea c co
O O S O' S O O. O D S S •S M S S O O R O O C O O R O O C
O •
. P
I
II z • • • *1
p • .• •• • - • •• • • • •• • • • •- • • • • • • • • • . •
S O O 8' O S$ O S. S S O O O O S S O O O C O O C O O C
G -
1=
. • • a •• . • .0 •• . • '• •' ' * • • . p •• •• • • •• •• . • ••�++ • p • • • • •
•
O O 10 S' O O 8 .. S ° S 8 S O O S O O O S C O O O O 0 q
b
•cc' • i • •' • • .0 • • • , •• t • •• •• • • • * •• • •• •• • ••' p •• • •• • •
O ' • O O ' S 8. 'O O N �C ¢ co O 8 1 0 O O O 8. N a 8 O 8 O O O O
o N .
E Q .M M M = P - .
�1 N I IT
err
.. I' • • • •, • ;• • • •• c • � •. • • • * • • • ' t • • • • • �. *
N ^1 ' S S q I • O 1-1, ' a - . O S O, 8 O n ' q O u? q q O c S q O O ¢,
1 u CU N '� N J M M P P C C
- N P LO c O n C
V 2'
W 2
W - yj a 0 W_ Y :
2 I • < N J N
— , Y W . O Z L C 2 .c W' ' 2 N C. S W - i •
< Y i Y too
411 • L L
II I 2 W 'm co _ iW C 2
y 0 2 co O £ S
I 5
i U • W r o U
. < - W . S J �.. O - U U
- a 1 1 1r O 0 W W .. ■ 0 2 y 0 C N = W. b w. . YI O N ..• Q W; C S W — ■ < W O
• — I . U W W r S m ea U O 2 <
g N 0 < GO £ < C i S O O W _ Y O r 0 2 2
• j C a. .. U D.J. U O a. . y 2 Y CO i . W W
i J 2 0 1n. O - O J J O r i N S
J W 1 cc c a 2' 2 2 C W 0. Q. N ¢ S 0 J CO C CC
CC
1 I ^ t y N !J C 1' W • Q W i r N N = 2 y 0 Y y — .0 i
C — • 6 = , W W J J O C a. f
H = = = = 2. 2 W W = • N W N 0 • =
O 0 C 2 W y
i J 7 W W = O Y c •C us 0 .2 N 2 J 0 J
T V 7 C S ',. = 0 = = i Y ti .. r 0 .i J 0 '6
ii E < W C S N O O O O O O O I L i N = < = 3• -. U O <
< N_ 1� N y N >> N N 0 y N N N 7 Y co
Ii
I
• • • • • * Si • •- 5'e. -• • • •'• -• • ••• • • • • ry
E QO y ac N c • P P r p r, - ' e.
i el q. q •. q ' �'. h ( M I r., g q .. ^ ; e �. F e 01 0 e-. e
. II = . O O Lc. N -. .O W S' P 0 ee I o N C M M. V1 r 1 c N c - C _
• W en o P M - .+ P P • N v.. i NI P . 1 f- V P .r y r. O 0 e.
I'_ i • 0 N • N 10 N N. • •+ P ' r- • P f.: N P a
1( f ._ . t
— r J
I •I et O N ❖1 N R R 6 . q N �; ° � I 8° v; ..o - c. r -.
_ % p N •' v(: T m ' P �y N .O• .0 M 1(t • f" Ye O �` O f` ._
. (V M P M • P P • r M N P 1` K' P• C N i
O O N O o N N' • • P, O O r so' O O' P O P A C
0S. e 0 .. d 0 0 0 n O 0 d ,f -t -r� J 0 .S� d e .. O 0 0 0 e d ' e. ?' s .r d ? .3 0-
T 0 0 0 0 0 0 : 0 '> O 0 0 0 o o o O ^1
C O O O "' O O O C o - O o c O O c o r e, c, -r c : ' e { - f e ! ,? ..7... .r .t . ^ 0 � - e e e e t ,_ -
u CC. pp.
i ^ V e- en P c .• •
N ee M: $1 o - re. S y C 4 N e y N N k e N C N n C "
W N N N N N C.) N N N N' N N N N N N N Y N N N N N N N N C-
' Q r r w !1" e; et e.! e; e r e t r _ F r +. n ^
e or. O O Q On r r O C. O I O O c 00 C O- O O O C C 0 I C
W 6 Q. Cq 6. 4. 3. v. 4, •l a. f.. s C a i e ' G 0, e a • a. a; C a'
r r r r NC r r r w r' r r N1 t ` i r »' r • r r r •
• ..
. ,— , milmling.mi
tip• __ —_,�._
as,
t„n
Sr -mama
C A—
•
Ii • • • • •
1
g $ 8 8 ' 8 € 8 8 8 8 8 8 € 8 0 8 8€ €' 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8.
it g.7- 8 8 8 o 8
_ I'� ° � " R ' v In c c c cc N r0 C.
° r `� o - ^T
O I II fe
- r s
C. r r r r ro
C O N N N N N N N N • • • .•
• • • • , • • , • • • ∎•
I •
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ' 8 8 8 '8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 88 € F
. I; =;
1
I 1 •, • is • • :• • • • •• • ,• •. • • • •. • r
I 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 , 8 8 8 8 8 8 8. 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 r
=1 I
It li 8 $ O 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8€ 8 o 8 8 8 8 8 i E dlat ^ I . • • • « • • • • ', • • • • • • «' •' •' • • • • •' • • •. •
I $ g. g . g e 8 8 8 8'8 8. 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8= 8 8
or on e'l N N
i t La. • •' • • • • • O •• • • •• •• •• • •• • • • • • * • •• '• •
II Or N . 8 Q h c •y O b 8 8 8 i n 8 O p 8 8 S 8 8 g 8 O 8 8 r. c
i 1 .000 0 t• .O .O ^ 0 N 0 0 w 0 r n- O C
C : V1 tU o b ' M q c
1 ° h " J _
If Z
C N N N N
W r N 0 0 O 0 r
y S c 0 0 =Sr = Z
c c t c
CO3 ea S: U 0 t S. S. S S b -
11 W � CO CO 6
II S. S . u _ S 2 c c O t c c t c i H y -c
W
. r W N f
II - 2 c N `. CC S S S. S - c
C 7 7 7 = u W- N - N p,. ► a •. •• 0 O O. 2 m Z' b O ., .
v W - 0 - ^ U . U . U U Z c c 0 0 c c
_ - V. J U at _ _ _ p W m L N N 0 CC • III F c 1 1 1 J 0 J O m N - 1*. 7 7 V. a r S' O = W v
4 U
= = _ 6 c. O
W J r W U 0 'C 7• c •
2 c ....
N c N c C '4 N t S y 6 0 .I1 Ch d W c 0 0 = W
I � . c ac c' = Y 11 W W c _ c c
= U: Cl 0 U U 0 ► S S c • -
2 S Cl U c •S S K S r W c Y O = • 0 0
O . W W W W S - W 6
E Y -' t W W Q. o m .Z • IC S CO m m W 0 W t • c 7. t 0 Y CO CO - _ 4^. J S. U c W
Q Y. r •. r •. C 7 _ N • i
•. a- 4 W •[ Y L 1 L.' 6 6. 6 O 6 a W 7 .. J O In N N i
11 I • • • 'C''.."‘ • • • •- • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .
% i 1 z v _ ° o n 8 °$ R 8$ 8 Fs £ p g 2 -
0
�� In
1 I r
r •
r` ^ a h g ° 8 n c v q 8 R 8 4 c a > c £ 6, . C. r, .
.. •: y •- In C N o o r. O N O c O C y ^ . Q om+ « w c r
N c d w c i 4 9 cT -, co et 4 ' 4 C 2 rf -' C r o O -I. r C
N. d 1. d c o ' o' o o 0
uS e O O O O O O O O_ I0 b O O O O O O O O
i ct c d t 4 S i f 4 v re l - a e ^ . re -• a c .
- r r r r r d r . r r r r r — —
..
G_ 1 -
Cf C. G .. N w`. If1 V 1. a 0' 0 1 !n 0 IC P •' . e C - N .'
•+ c - h ti
O C C O C a g a C a a• a a r ¢ ¢ c 0 C a .w al C ! c
c ' a a, c .
r: A. - J . a t c ti ..
; 1111 at •
•
I
•
. \
II L. • • C • • • t CC O O C O • • • • C C t • CC O C O O E. • ■ • p C O * • • GG� • CC C • c O O •, C O • • C O •' C •• •
1 O O O O O O O O O , O S
V' N a N 0 M G n
N O •O ¢ ¢ Y a O e'
i VT •+ m P 0 01 N 0 0
C r N ...4 ~ W h
¢ M S ¢ m N N < ,
J N
' p CC pp pp p pp Lf p CC CC • • ' • C • cc
O 8 O O 8 M O. O � O. O O 8. q O O O O O S r O O G C O G
V1 .
i n tel
• •. •• *.• p •• • • • • •• •p' ■ p* 8, * w * •CC • G • � • ******
*
• c
O O 8 0 '' O O • O O S g O O O O O O O O "C C O O C C C .
O O
it ° .
il II F. .—. • ■ ". * • ' • ■ • * • • • •. • ' * • , • t• • • * •. • • • ♦' • *
IIO $ $ $ 8 8.0 8 :8 8 $: $ 8 8 8 $ $ 8 $ $ 8 8 8 $ $_ • it u_ •
.. 0
III g -. •
N
W I p: M S 8 O O O O 8 O O . O O S. O O O S O S. 8. • C O C O O g .
O N
• I M • i • - p + s ► t • t t • • t r t • • . t • ■ 'r r ♦ p ■' • • e
f O O S S 1 V r. N S O, O O O O O O O O O O S O M O G O C C
a i 0 O
'{ 'l
r
O d J N u
d O 2 O I O 0 N 2 =
m CD j O ,..,= F{ d U £ 'J W 2 U 0 d ■ N S i r U ' 0 •D 0 2 U 0 i W
_ W U' ¢ P ¢ W 4' W K W y O U
£ z - W i W J I C U. J 2 0 d. £ - ¢ -
C W 0 (D C y W 2' O C N O W ¢ O d _
I f
C -- N - - r .) 2 i
~ 2 r i W ¢ W Y r' a r 0 O r O y ' = U N U .c - W •a £ W • C , . 4 0 r r W
W: d m U: d 6 N - J ¢ c • t ¢ U 'U
O ^ C Z £ W 0 = W 'JJ C
0 W O O O O C £ 0 £ O Z £ CO £ 0 i _ W W U U 0
2: r O O: O 0 0 r• W O j W W 0 0 2 1
i C 0 O O 0 O £ • ¢' O O O H O. tD W. U W N 0 "J 2 v. W
> 7' 7 7 7 = W. ¢ 2 -; 0 ¢ r ¢ a N y' - r O
• N r r 2 2 2 .• m : O > J J ' ¢ 2 =CI' W W r d K U U U
O f , f• T T O 1 W i O O O O O O r T C W - i C c
J J J J: J J J £ W ¢ (.p. 7 y Z 2 2 2 d a d
• • •• • • • • • • • ' • • • ■• • • • • • • •. • •• • • •
n 1 n n M V. N C N C .• .0 p C C r r r e O r N H N N- P r
n h o i l N n. O •' q O R . C n I C r __ r r ea
I I i N N r. M m m V1 • N n M T N r N M < G a M a <" c r
II C ' a, . " •o ^ v r Y+ 5 C '. .+ -• • i an O 2 an V. J in T C U •-
( it M V
1 1 1 1 v J ' -. - .2 ..
i
_
i C N •• w O. Z C V O i N O r M r '` C P y N N: P c- C.
C •
5 : •• a C . . . c C O C v -. R a c.• C Q -C. a. v C C C r
.._ . _ � ' Y1 V1 M r n V• 'N N V1 • . N r- O it O. M r cr. r ,. it yii ' O •- . N xj - .- d el' O O � O W O r O I M O N O O c
0 r i 0 • 0 -I' d : e ' d `f n o 'r. et • -1 ..t lc c
O C
n o C n C O O O C O O a o! O a O C o O C O o e e n
n! G C G C : C G ore G R C C C C O � - + < C
d e -' e e - . r c-r - d e t , e r r * r' •-• + .S -f , i .+ I
-: r ,_
c r r- : r r t- I e r r r r r c - r r _ - - .
•
N • a ' V• ,[ ^- cr e G : N M ■ V• .f '. c: ' o C S. • •• N .. 4!. n
. - - V• • M i• s . ` r • N+ lc ‘..E. - O •./.; .4 i •G ' rr., r n r r, i i
N r, J O . r J N j'
. I
c O ^ I o < r C C t r • a: " O r < e c 0 C < r n o C ` n e c 0 G r
C a ¢ .. � , . • c C c a '. ¢ I a, • a, a at •. a
•t . r at
n r n - • •
r- n f n r M ''. r n .n.. n n -, n+ n * * n n-, n n r .. e. " a
' c I .G. d • ' .e , e v '. ,f . .0 I .0 '. .4.- .0 '! e .0 e e .0 ..' e ti .•
. _ I �.- ..
7 .
. , •
•
,..
_ _ .
. .
• .
a m
�_ o € 8 • 8€ 8 o 8 8 8 8 8 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 0. o €.0
11 1
ea IL •-• V 0
I c z . N' CV n u•. • c c r •
E .• in e .. n cc n • ..
• m m m CC
O cc ...• c N p N h .
•
8 8 8' 8. oa, p 8 8 8 p 8 8 p 8 p p e 8 8 8 q 8 8 8 0 8 8
c n
g 1 n
•
I nVOI • •• • • • . • • • • • • • • • • r • •• • • • •. • •• • • • •
-- li 8 0 8 o ° °, 8 8 8 8 e °, a e ° . 8 8 ° . $ p ° ° 8 8 ° , a ° . 8 8 8 c•
8 8 8 o 8
III V
• 0 • ■ '• • t •• • • / • •' • • • • • • • * • • • * • R •
I'i a p pp p p p p p C p c C C
i ii y' 1 8 •
O 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 O . 8 8 8 8 6
c • •• •r. • ,0 • • • • • • • Or • • • •. • •. • •. •. • • • • •
$ $ 8s o ° °, V . 0 0 8 8 8 8 8 0 8 8 8€
N 0 C
•
I �� � •• ++ :• pp • p ' �� 0 p - I • • • • • • • • • • • 0 It. p
8 2 8 O ^? O • ,c; ,1 1'. 8 8 O N, "‘.'= i 'V O O 8 .. 8. 8 q . O 8 Y O 0 C,
i . �.• O\ n n n 0 ^ N a C M
C ' N •-I .• N N H .n.• •Y 0 M
I
i •.• {y .• b co 4 . H-
o W 2 V- t
Is J U y c CO CC i< C U J r = 2 0 = < J
6 ._ 2 < It F = N U `
W 0 'N - O: ti 0 2 W 0 = U
O 2 y w - ti O
• N ► ti Y W. L 2 •
1 c 0
1 2,- Ka U < ti ♦ < C i C C •O c - 0 0
■ F 0 IC 0 I 2 6' W 0 a. < : J t' Y = p. U an N Cl.
O 2 i2 2 J. IC C • 0 0 Y p -4 1.- 0 C a p c N
= '= 0' ^ i 1- N U i' 0 J 2 0 2 u j' ti 1r 0 n. J 0 G N.
[•. ,W t` . 6 ._ C J 0 W - W = Y ] ' N p 7
0 W O. <'- W N = Q 1... J 0 U O. C W 2 IC N C — — W 2
6 • S U C 2 2 0 W Y 2 Y c c J 0 0
< '< < i IJ fD J re t Y 2 - ea c t J 0 p -.
C :6 C 6 < - • W W W C y C N J • N 4 . 2 J 0 O i 0
• 1W W m 2 = = 2 N Z W W = J N C U W
2 12 2 2 O • r C C L 2 G. 0 CO C U „ C •({ 2 1• r '4 C
W W W W J _ i < _ < J` S 2 2 S 2 W W O
••••, IU [D. U' CD' N: = CO N J 6 Y � J J 7 JJ J
t .b 0 k O C r O C p ••• n re N c 0 w n1 O e r C c • n s e- •
i ,a. h. in v 8 q 0 R en w - r e o r. . tri o VI ty n -. n m n c n 0 p n 0 c e S 0 2,- rl = N
O C J Y. P1 C. ` . N r P < n r O[ IC Cl. Y
6 CD co 20 . C`' N N O - l l
I . O r e n. r2 ey r V C O C pp C C P N to .w. N O of 0 o n E .
v VJ 8 v 8 •• N if. C 8 8 N cC c C R. n r_
�Ny a n c n • n O n 'n •r c n C Y C &
.• T. C ~ .. 0 t0 h J v; N N t� i r n N O O �'
-e o m .re -11 :! ~ � d d ? d •f s C f O O 9 :f 1 9 e o 'O o 0 0 0 o 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - n 0 0
• '0 0 O C 0 0 0 C C o 0 0 0 0 0 '0 C '0 0 C 0 o C C C i
e . r e - re r e r e 9 9 t.. 9 re re re r e 9 9 9 r 9 8 a a" a --' --1 rr I
2 - ^ c 0 te 0 o o n r o e r r .. r- - . - f--
C n .
1 'n V• n 0 Ot M
•
N tr .2 0 �c 1 n n 0 •, = • • Mt 0 c n c n c I .
. c. '.o. 0. N Cu N W en ^ r n 1^ er V • • ' • • • e • n
E 1_ r ti r n' r` r n ' n' •- P- M '.r r r' se r .- r A
a-. e oe
'o O n a C O c 0 0 0 o 0 o O o C C O 0 0 c C e - n C:
c A t e 0. 4 e q 2. a v t 4 C m a C. t c. 'IC 0. 0 C
r In n n P r n n n n n n n M r r n N n M • N ti H I
1 ' ° • i•E S .[.' e: .r �� 1C W !' l 4. 1f N tC tC w< ' v: a �� e v:. .c' : �' I +
aillinrilli. .
Elli- .
•
i abaft . .
•
. �� .
8 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 € $ € € 8€ 8 e € €$ €.
i ' 0. 0 �O t . N - ! • C '11 0 C ' c`,. p 8 . . c
w J , N 0 a m N M m K 4. N C K z•-: .. • W • 1!1 r N M
N N r N e
d •
st q o
1 0 N ¢ ¢ m ¢ ¢ F M S K r r- r .-- E
• • • •• • • * • • • • * • ♦ • * * •
p M N p N N K
I I ii 8 8 8 8 S 8. g g O O g 8 8 V� O 8 8 8 8 8 O O V, rO C
.. m < K
• c
„ 30 -t C
•
. • • •' • • • • • • • • • • • • • *- '• * • • • • • • C • • r
il l aI 8 8 8 8 8 '8 8 8 8 8 8' 8' 8 8 8 8 C 8 8 8 8 8 8 C
8 8 . C.
N
pall -,
li
• ' :c 1 • * * • • • T 1- p p
i i n 8 8:` N 8 8 8 8 8 8 Z. O 1 0 O 8 b 8 8 . S O 8 8 8 a O 8 ^
p •O CO N N CO
I m -N N N a n
1 J
•
I I I c ^1 s e • R' • . • t e • • • '
rv _ o 8' 8 8 8. 8 s 8 8 8- 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
i 0 c
ce
c
ter '• • • • • :•• • •'• • H I • • • • * •
I 8 8 8 8 8 8 a 8 a 8:8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 x? 8 & O C 3
i U1 I'1 0 v1
+• CO
- CO m `� m m .. In C.
I
• li e T I
1. W :
y N , 0
O'. C CO W
W U' 2 Z 1
C' �' S S N 2 N 2 N U I
C C.. _
O . _ 2 •� W 1 W N < W • N ■
' < = c O N c a 0 r W
'J km � ,y N i .- z __ r 2' • 2 J 2 C U
J O W W- S 0 =' - W 0 r N O
it 10 6 : •• N < N O W 0 0 t ti 2 0 N _. J 0 0
F S •-. IU — J • •-• . 0 0 0 • < O S W Q • W 2
10 2 W
2 �U In 1S ~ ' < C r C J p U C W 2 N 0 ! d p p 0
■ C N Ito' C 2 0 0 2 m J. cc CC
< < O 2 2 ■
< U 0 0 0 J 0 co 0 U •If W U 0" u. 6. =
C i2 1W W ¢ 10 — • J — U 2 1 2 U < 2 a W W
N U U N — O '! N — r is 6 W 0 C T M 0 O 0 W N < 1r J
7 W > 12 >• Y M1. • J W W o < Y. W < < .J
0 ¢ .'J ti • -1 . 2 0 ID 2' 2 0 2 6 — 0 0 .2 W O U y - ¢ ¢ •
• ¢': ¢ O W — Z 0 ' 0 0 a W r 2 >• = 0 2. < 2 W .-
6 0, C 16 C C 0 C • 0 0 CO < J ¢ W c 2 W y
' ; i;;;; ; ;;t;; ; ; 0 O O O AO O ¢ C CO W ; •y C N Y1 F M P •2 M •-• = 0. ^ _ w {fir M1. - c
• ¢ m R '� • a c
02 f _
N N
•
- - - 0 . - - _ . C: n c. ' 8 a c N R a M:. I m S F. �. Z? -. x e n r: , •
•
E < 1 ¢ pro m . • at N1 F r. n. ( b C r n a w • ^ ( = e P C M1
;O O !O O O :N N n. 0 N y1 a O P ¢ m s O N m c Y.
. J ,1 d 3 Il d ? !d d _ d d ". e s d e F d -! c '-' 1 1
'O o O it, O :o O o O O N O O o O - -' 11
'� 0, 0 :0 0 =. :o o c c o c c o e c c c e c o c c • o ^ c - - RI. e
i i i I.
lk
0 et is 0 e • e c c ^ •.• .. v v n m y N
„ T O• :.0 M1 c is •• 0 F CO so
'r r' I K r' ir' r' pc or r' r r' K K •. .-
• .._ ___ ii ¢ n I¢ i C i n c t C. c I t ¢ G 0 r c n b ^ C O e
II
•
11.11111111r1:111H— .
•
•
•
•
•
•
. 4111.mmi (57
' • p • • •• * • C . p ••• •• • • • * •• t • •C • cc •CC • •' • •. ••• ss c • ;'
3 • S O O O O $ -O 8 o O O C $ O C O O C o C C. O C C
8
.• P M VPOO no co- O c C,
P mI�NC aN r P h • I C r-- < CV I` MO M - M c ..
z y
�¢ a G °
d n' rr N
S M
V ! mNN-.r m!. r .m m r
n N M M N N •
N •• p / • • p p pp C p p pp p p cc O C S C G'
VI . ,1I • 0 S $ $ S O O $ O .$ 1$ O O $ $ $ O, O $
C I(
II o $ $ $ $ $ $ 0 0 ° ° , 6r 8 $ c 8 $ $ $ c c $ € c
o
c P
.I N o . O : M
r • •• • • • • • • p $ $ $ $ C 8 $ S . • • • f • P tt . - • • •• •• • • • c •
c * $ ¢ O $ $ g g g 8 P 8 $ c $ C C
8 N . N P CI7 c
c '' • w .:
1 0 — • , • •• • tpp f 1 • •• • p • •' • • •pp • •. • • • •• • • r
i 8 b S $ $ 8 . O O 8 $ S $ O $ S $ S O C C $ C O
o
O
N . r
. I
1 1 — • ■ /
•
• ; / : • • • • • • • • • ♦ • h •, * • CC fi • t
• p O M O S :, Vf S N $ O N N O O $ $
•
O C O 0.0
S f O . O ' f ' N I O H P 6 0 CO in
.: r )O f N 1 0 V1 - )
N N N M O
V
co . W_
Y
W 6 J
.. ^ , t . r 2 J i a c O W Y
N
W 6 < y 2 U m
~ 6 J 1 0 0- L I C 6 0 0 ` _
O y 1r £ 7 I a r y ■ j O- -, • V2 0.. C N S
S {.1 1 O 2 N N < m 6 N < - C
il _ � V ' p j ' O W U C W 0 S j N W W O 2
Y W ¢ • J W W U
0 C 0 O r 6 •, . 2 U 4 1 1- O 6' S G _ 6 - 6 6 E ` 0 c
0 c J 2 6: C 2 W I W y • J = 0 N £ C
C1.0 0 . r 6 E 6 U O W W Ir 1 y 2 N t 0 J J
W O 6 C O 6 C W co 0 4... U < 7 NO
0 W CC 0 CC
U N U 2 O W J Y u c c O
n _ S 2 1 N . 1 O 1 N 6 r 6 2 U 6
W 0 J O < < J 1.N O 0 W J
0 0 i J 6 W CO m •- N 6
W = J N 0 J = W 2 J 0 2 i.e, N
� O m Y U 1 N J m 1 I J J N = C •/ Y y _ J CO
W = C ' CO 0 O O: J 2 Y I N O < N J 0 0 < < W u J C 0
• r y � j N Y P t n. h M N I C t n. N ♦ C P.. t'•! , V• c P P C
S• w o + V IC N r I. V1 � m P I` P N. Cr. • .. V ... _
a ¢ ¢ M A [Y 1 M N r- V N C = . 1"
m V n.• N M N : V ..• M 0 . r
M m r •
•
VI • ^ • C t . ; M r N : 1 IV O C ; n, N ! o. o V r C c C' ¢_ -'
i $ I' .1 ^ o r N M 1 t r — P C C• C. K V• . f -:1
W O m
V o - i M N f1 M ^ V) M o ° T`
m
0 V N i N r N .• 0 .•' M O O' O O N
la a e ,.r
9 0 0 d eJ 9 0 ! of 0' f d r . . d e - d e e '1 T
s M m O O O 0 O O O P 0 0 C 0 0 O N Ci
o 0 r 1 .. C 4 8 8 i 8 8 J - r - J - r. C J -
o r r^ CI L r /? • I _ •
y .7 .. V) 1'G = r' m' P r 0 I N r ^ Vf V r a r. 1,' r T - r.
0 o .. . 0 Fr "
) n r r r r r � m it m r ¢ c a V
0 . 0 0 0 0 0 c : 0 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 c
.
z :. no' 0 c r. c c c • c c o c - ''.0.• c c. 0 r - c
• _ r„. s . rim N as . w J - . * -t
. amouria .
.7 ...
. •
..
i
_ _
1
/� f�
T0: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Irwin Seliged+""Economic Development and Grants Coordinator
SUBJECT: ELECTRIC VEHICLE GRANT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
DATE: June 17, 1980
OBJECTIVE:
The objective of this action is to approve the Cooperative Agreement
with the Department of Energy in order to begin implementation of the
Electric Vehicle Demonstration Project,
ASSUMPTIONS:
It is assumed that it is in the best interest of the City to partici-
pate in the DOE Electric Vehicle Demonstration Program because of the
potential energy savings of the vehicles themselves, as well as the
significant public relations which should result from the project.
FACTS:
(1) On August 21, 1979, the City Council approved a resolution
authorizing submission of a grant application to participate in the
DOE Electric Vehicle Demonstration Program.
(2) In February of 1980, the City of Lynwood was notified that this
application had been approved by DOE.
(3) During the period yarch through iVIay 1980, City staff negotiated
with DOE concerning the project and established the following cost
sharing ratio: DOE share $160,932 (77%) and City's : share $49,153 (23%)
for a total project cost of $210,085. Project cost will include
purchase of ten electric vehicles, replacement parts and maintenance
over a four year period. It should be noted that much of the City's
share will be in-kind donations.
ANALYSIS: �
Participation in the Electric Vehicle Demonstration Program offers
the City of Lynwood a unique opportunity to play an important role
in our nation's continuing effort to find alternatives to foreign
energy sources. Lynwood will be able to undertake this participa-
tion at a cash cost of less than $3,000 per vehicle. It is also
estimated that these electric vehicles will achieve significant
cost savings during operations, since electric vehicles have a
6� cost per mile of operation, which is substantially lower than con-
ventional vehicles. In addition, this project should be of particu-
lar benefit to the City in,establishing a more positive public
image for the City, due to the enormous public relations potential
of this project. This is enhanced by the fact that Lynwood is one of
only fifteen cities from throughout the country selected by DOE
to participate in the program.
RECO\4SIENDAT ION :
That City Council approve the subject Cooperative Agreement and
authorize the �fayor to execute it.
-- - _. �D__
. � �
DATE: �UNE 17, 1980
T0: HONORABLE MAYOR AJJQ CITY COUNCIL
(Ll1'l
FROM: GERARD GOEDHART;� ASSISTANT
SUBJECT: I.IABILITY INSURANCE EXTENSION OF POLICY FROM
APRIL 16, 1981 to JUNE 30, 1981
PURPOSE
o To present the City Council information concerning the
extension of the current liabil.ity insurance coverage from
April 16, 1981 to :1une 30, 1981.
FACTS
• On April 1, 198� the City Council approved the liability
insurance pol.icy for April 16, 1980 to April 16, 1981 with
Fremont Insurance Company and Midland Insurance Company.
1
• At the time of their approval, the City Council requested
information on the cost of extending the policy to June 30,
1981 to coincide with the ending of the fiscal year.
s In the attached letter, Mike Bogen of Cal-Surance finds
that Fremont Insurance Company requires $5,997 for the ex-
tension while Midland Insurance Company is willing to extend
their coverage for an additional permium ef $3,998. The
total cost for the current $5,000,000 coveraqe is $9,995.
ANALYSIS
a The current cost for the liability insurance coverage is
$48,756. The average daily cost is $48,756 divided by 365
or $133.08 per day.
s The extensio� cost is $9,995 for an additional 75 days
coverage. The average daily cost of $9,995 divided by 75
or $133.27 per day.
s The costs of the extension are comparable to the current
coveraae.
RECOh1MEN0ATI0N
o The Cir,y Council approve the extension of the current
liability insurance coverage from April 16, 1981 to June 30,
1981 with Fremont Insurance Company and Midland Insurance
Company for the amount of $9,995.
3 ... . _ _ _---
� --- _ �_y ___
;
I _ �I ', �.� . '; ' ' n' .'. l !''. . I I
� �
CAL-SURANCE
� 3475 TORRANCE BOULEV.4R0 CMAILING AOORESS P.O. BOX 3459]
� TOfaRANCE. CALIFQFNIA 9a510 (293J 542-7309
May 30, 1980
Kr. Gerard Goedhart
�ssistant.City Manager
City of Lynwood
11330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, California 90262
RE: Additional Premium Quote for Extending Liability Cove2age
from 4-16-81 to 6-30-81 .
Dear Gerard:
The Fremont Insurance Company requires $5997 to extend t`�eir
5250,OOo layer of protection from 4-16-81 to 6-30-81.
The Midland Insnrance Company is willing to extend their excess
coverage of $4,�0,000 from 4-16-81 to 6-30-81, for an additional
premium of $3998.
�lso, the Midland said that they would provide the city
wi th an additional $5,000,000 coverage for a oremium of $6225
�er year. Ti1ey would extend that coverage to June 30, 1981 for
an additional $1276 in addition to the $6225.
� Please let me know if the city wishes to proceed with the exten-
sion of conerage or tlie additional $5,000,000 of orotection. By
tSzis time nex t year, the market may fiave changed in which case
t1Ze extension would be a good �ruchase since you would save
vour rates for a couple oi months. This, of course, is some-
tzing we cannot aredict, but most of the industry feels that tine
rating stsucture wi11 turn sometime towards the end of 1980.
Best rec�ards,
i
�� �
' `4� �P . .
?,�sociate in Risk Kan ement
�lice President
`dDS:j1
CC: :�r.. Tommy Davis, City Manager
A CHAFiTEFiEC' FINANCIAL ScRViCc� CCMPANY
_ fll. !' '.�! .. � !' i �
� �
�une 17, 1980
T0: THE HONORABLE h1AY0R_�_ND CITY COUNCIL
���
FROM: GERARD GOEDHART, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
SUB�ECT: LIABILITY INSURANCE - ADDITIONAL 55,000,000 COVERAGE
PURPOSE
� To present the City Council information concerning an addi-
tional $5,000,000 of liability insurance coverage.
FACTS
o On April 1, 1980 the City Council approved the liability
insurance policy with Fremont Insurance Company and Midland
Insurance Company with a$SO,OOO Self-Insurance Retention,
a 5300,000 Stop Loss, and a$5,000,000 limit of protection
for the amount of $48,756.
o At the time of their approval, the City Council requested
information on the cost of an additional $5,000,000 of
coverage.
v In the attached letter, Mike Bogen of Cal-Surance finds
that Midland Insurance Company would provide an additional
$5,000,000 coverage for the period of April 16, 1980 to
April 16, 1981 for S6,225; for the period of April 16, 1980
to �une 30, 1991 for $7,501.
ANALYSIS
� In 1979, the City paid $74,015 for $3,000,000 liability
coverage. Theaverage daily cost is $74,015 divided by 365
or $202.78 per day.
� For a policy with $10,000,000 protection and an extension
to �une 30, 1981, the cost would be $66,252. The average
daily cost is $66,252 divided by 440 or $150.57 per day.
� The average daily cost for the additional $5,000,000 of
coveraae is $17.05.
o The attached loss analysis shows the City has had a very
good record of accidents and losses in the past three policy
years. However, a$10,000,000 poJ.icy would protect the
City from any potential substantial lawsuit.
RECOMMENDATION
• The City Council approve an additional $5,000,000 coverage
with Plidland Insurance Company for the period of April 16,
1990 to June 30, 1981 for the amount of $7,501.
--------- __ --- ..
i
� ,_. . .; . _-�._
i
� _ ��
;
;!. II l ;I: i ':
� �
� � CAL-SURANCE
� 3475 TOF7RANCE BOLJLEVAf CMAILING AO�RESS P. BO 2373a'I
TORRANCE. CAUFOFNIA 90590
.4ay 30, 1980
bir . Gerard Goedhart
Assistant City Manages
City of Lynwood
11330 Bu11is Road
Lynwood, Californi.a 90262
R:: Additional Premium Quote for Extending Liability Coverage
� from 4-16-81 to 6-30-51
Dear Gesard : •
The Fremont Insurance Company requires $5997 to extend their
5250,OOo layer o£ protection from 4-16-81 to 6-30-81,
The Midland Insurance Company is willing to extend their excess
coverage of $4,�0,000 from 4-16-81 to 6-30-81, for an additional
premium of $3998.
�lso, �`�e Midland said that they would provide the city
with an additional $5,000,000 coverage for a nremium of $6225
per year. They would extend that covesage to June 30, 1981 for
an additional 51276 in additi.on to the $6225.
Please 1et me know if the city wishes to proceed with t�e e�tten-
sion of coverage or the additi.onal $5,000,000 of protection. By
this ti.me next year, the mar:cet may have changed in whicfi case
tze extension would be a good pruchase since you would save
your rates for a couple of months. This, oz course, is some-
tning we cannot predict, but most of the indus�y feels that the
rating stucture wi11 turn sometime towards the end of 1980.
Best recyards,
_. 7
�
"� '! .P. .
'1 �!'� r •
y'5sociate in Risk Man ement
Vice ?resident
:�1DB : j 1
CC : �ir . '�ommy Davis , City :Ianager
A Ci-iAFaTEr' FiNANCiAL SEr'7-VICES COMPAiVY
_ - - --- -- --- - - — ----
I.OSS APlALYSIS --
cni.-suiinN�:i: ns�oc�n�ri:s
Nnru: iryoF�Y,d�•�?
_. _ ____ ACLIIII.N'I'S DON''I' JUS'1' IUPI'I.N-7'llliY PRtil'ARGD UY:/n,(�.�,EN� (.� °
Altli I:AUSIiD 11Y UNSAI'R CONDITIONS IIA7'ti: �=�1_S�.—_- _-
ANIi IINSAI�Ii .Al:'1'S /` �` y��
rc��tcv_ri:atou � 99 m 5�/G-� y/G-7� �o �/-/�-79 �//� �o �/G-78 _
�IOtTNI` Fiolit3'I' 7CFiot)N7' �TN:ItItltliii
NO I) ,T� ' 1 N � 0; NO �
nuro n��u�� INJURY _I - J,G.�.2 .37Y .2 .�P9P _ Go� _ e2 /,995 5oS_ �
nu m riiori:� unrtn 3 550 6�3 � 5�50 /, 30.S a -6 J. �-?
N��N-nu�ro uou�i.v INJURY I/ 3 9,ac� -- �90 /5 /.3,/P3 /.s�P // /�� /o,S89
---- ---- — --. ._ - - --- —
NON-AU'f0 ��u orr:u•rr nnr+ncc 5 /,,350 /, �.3� /�s/ fd' �i3 /3 /O,�/9 3,��
NON-AU'f0 ri:as INJUIt J� ld -0' � y�"9a yo8 5 5,33 /. yGS
-------- -- -- --- —
�ro rn i, o yG, s�� o?, 3 `/S ��, /�3 -S!o/5 .3 ,.3o y _ /_,u'� PS3
'1 '0'1'AL C Oh1ll 1 N�U � � p� �/j� � y�?-- --
11CCIUIiN'f i:AUSIiS ARIi PRIiV1iN'I'AISLL, WI: RECOMMI:Nb YOU ItIiV11iW YOUR IASSIiS, U�'1161tM1Nli TIIH CAUSIi
ANI) 'I'AKIi AC'1'TON '1'0 PRIiV1iN'1' FIII2'I'IIIiR I.OSSIiS� Ot� 7'IIP. SAMI: 1'YPF: -CAI.-SURANCIi IS 1'RIiPARlill 'f0 \
AtiS1S'I' YOU IN 7'IIIS r•r•r•oirr. 'rni� I�OLLOWINC ARI! '1'YPiCAL CAUSIiS 01� PRIiV1iN'I'A(1Lfi ACCIUIiN'I'S. _ `
�'
M1U'f 0 NON -All'f0
[] SI'lilil� 'I'O PAS'I' fOR �] PAILUkii '1'0 SIGNAL [J 7'RiP F� PALI. IIAZARUS [] SLIPPIiItY SUltl'ACliti
C(1NI11'ffONS . IN7'IiNTIONS
❑ IMYIt01'lilt UL'SIGN OR ❑ I.ACK 01� IIANIIItAII.ti
❑ I�I1I.LOIVINC 'f00 CI.OSIi1.Y ❑ 1MPI20PIiR OVIiRTAKINC CONS'1'IIOC'I'ION
❑ I'AfLURIi 'f0 CIIAItU
(] P�ll.11lili 'f0 YIIi1,U (] I)1$Rf:CARD 7'RAPI�1(: � A7'TRACTIVIi NUISANCIiS •
i1CNS OR 51CNAL5 ❑ I°A[I.URIi 'ftl INtiI'li(`I'
[] I�IPltlll'lilt "fUIiNING ❑ iMl'It01'lilt I1.I,UhIINA'fIONS
❑ 1D1PRO1'IiR RACKINf
❑ IMPlinl'tilt I'ARK[N[i '�
, —
.�„� S��„�„... __ _. .__. -
i II ; � :
� �,
'----�. �OTICh OF INTE?�TSO�' FOBYC=�I�RITAB- - SOLICIT9TI
/' American Council of Athletics
9nnual . X_______—
IN THE CITY OF LYN�900D 9266� 714-937-0485
Soecial event prange, CA Telephone
p,p, Box 505�— Ciiy Zip Code
�ddress in process
yes
4/1/79 4 ?revious License No.
Datie Organized
Incorporated Tax Exempt
T lied to what purpose?
Proceeds to app
_ op appeal Type of Donatiions
Date(s of solicitation
510 Tickets , 9-�5=80
Residential X From June 15,
Co^�merce/Industry
6/ 1�/ e � 0 eToLas e�on�Pas y t Goals
Term of e9 ou Local b10,000
�rom permit Siate 100,000
, tiational 1,000,000
Indicate Compensation, Salaries,
' Soliciiation �3�i11 be made by �o�issions eic, paid to
Paid Solicitors X N/A State deiails
Conductors
�'olunteers on reverse side
Prcmotors N A
New•spaper A4anagers see reverse
T��/Radio Solicitors see reverse
!�tail
Sale
Bo� Office
Other:
ADDRESS TELEPHO:�E
\Ah1E OF ORG9\IZATION TO BE BENEFITED 714-937
American Council of Athletics, 172° S. Douglass, =B, Anaheim, CA DATE
DESPRiPTION OF 19HAT IT DOES LOCATION OF ACTIVITY ACTIVITY
, supports athletes by selling $TO tick- Cal Pol Pomona T � SP1 �
ets to track & field meets number Printed NuMbered CT-3646
Admission to event by: $10.00
Tickei Invitation
Donation PRIC
XX
Projected Expenditures for this Solicitation� Transporatation
Prizes _ Publicity 200
Labor 52500 __ Telephone Rental Equipment
rood Stationery 50 Purchase Equioment
Favors
Advertising 1 '� Reservation Charges
??usic Food Resold (per plate costs)
Postage 100 Decorations Merchandise Sold
Printing 15�_ Entertainers apProx Other Expense: -
_ Costumes Rental Building Total 53500.00
Uniforms Permits,License
Address Telephooe
O�ficers Name and Title (Two Required) prange, CA
q
Print name and title Donald K. Harden, Pres. 3627 Park Central 719-.3 -
Signature '
8343
Ba_bara Westman 7492 McNeil, Buena Park, CA 714-522
Print name and title
r
�. � ,
gignature:
�—
� ,�- _.. ..- - .
�
� �
� ��---.._
I � _-.
; _-----
. � Ku
T. %
` A merican Council of Athletics
June 9, 1980
City of Lynwood
11330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, CA 90262
Gentlemen:
•
This letter is to request a non -fee license to solicit char -
itable.in the City of, Lynwood.
•
We are the American Council of Athletics.. Our State Office
is located at 1729 S. Douglass. Rd. TB, AnaheiM, CA, 92806.
The local office which would be handling the solicitation of
Lynwood is located at 3530 Long Beach Blvd., Long Beach,
CA. 90807.. The District Manager is John Papp. His phone
number is 213 - 427 -7431.
Our principal officers are Donald K. Harden, President, P.O.
Box 5172, Orange, CA 92667; and Barbara Westman, Secretary,
7492 McNeil, Buena Park, CA 90620.
We request permission to solicit throughout the City of
Lynwood. We sell tickets' on a door -to -door basis to ben- '
efit U.S. amateur athletes in the sports of Track and Field.
The American Council of Athletics holds several track and
field meets at various times throughout the year, to raise
funds for our athletes. In fact, we have a meet on August 2,
1980.
The solicitors receive an hourly wage of $3.10 and the Dis-
trict Manager receives a 4% override of local office gross
sales. The solicitation is to take place from 4pm to 3pm
on weekdays and loam to 2pm on Saturday, unless local ordin-
ances prohibit solicitation during any part of the mentioned
. time. The estimated expenditures we anticipate is approxi-
mately $3500, to be deducted from our estimated gross of
$10,000, in funds raised.
The ACA was organized on April 1, 1979 and.incorporated on
April 9, 1979 in San Diego, CA. We are a non - profit athletic
organization, listed with the Franchise Tax Board, as char-
itable and educational in purpose. Our forms are presently
in process. Daily deposit slips and daily reports of funds
are kept at the State Office. These records are open for
public inspection Monday through Friday from 9am to 5pm.
The funds raised are deposited with Security Pacific National
Bank, Two City Blvd. East, Orange, CA 92668.
P.O. BOX 5050 • ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92667 • (714) 633 -1121
i ;•4
American Council of Athletics
A
Contributions must be solicited because ACA does not
receive any . financial support from the government. There-
fore, we must rely solely on public support.
Enclosed please find relevant documents pertaining to our
organization and its exempt status, as well as the form
from the City of. Lynwood. If you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to contact me at 714- 937 - 0485.
Sincerely,
Mary Ann Boehlert
Permit /License Department
,.en ... f\n.. r rrcnouTS o9FF7 • 171 41 633-4121
1
•
:meEENw• Sane Men
MAaOnalfTNtaON UM. F. AM/L11,
UL f. Affala 31aall YL AMITY
7tASaea .Ilse R. IBM
STLYEnB A.'NEAYEL JN ' M RCIIII hMAEE M1
•
GIuMlma Eamon Comaaaa :. iaaMe t A. Ce
NEice a a G' annen. ALYa NAMED. WOMB
• Enemy* eac Anne • :IQ NAAIe
L MgCIY SAUL ALL MRS:aNN i.Y
- _ N. "aallp AMI
' X6 SAMM SAMI.IA.
'CCU WWII Calmat, 10111? X'NAM, .AL
MUSCULAR DYSTAOPMY ASSOCIATION �e >na et C. WEST
Aar.* as Meta nests Ceeat1 51®M Gina
i.ITNE COMMI1TEE -.-
:UL ETNAIOE
EUSMETNE :Ma •
all fa1E11NAW •
•ANN Suae 5, 1980
.MRS nee swat
limaismes
ZIUla M :EAM11112
Seaeory •
%MAT P. LEfla- . . •
Trammel
MAID G. GLEASG•
:GU NNEUNMU. City of Lynwood
VII, MINNIE SAILAEB City Cleric
YARY STEIN 3GSEer i..MSISAAM 11330 Burns load •
pREI P. LIWil Lytwood, Calif. 90262
'AMCA. AGV15DRY pear Sir:'
S'.UMITTe
•
:CNN NM .*L
arman• The officers and members of ehe Los Angeles County
:AVro UMFlEN. XI Chapter of MCA request your permission to conduct
Gu
uU 3
Guam Ill Mb
fcad. rail appeals during y, August uLE3 xa tag app is dnri Sul Au st S September •
:..1. UL 1980, within. your city. •
;Alps felt /. :a. .s.a.
iHIREEY'NMETEMAJL .YLt
:RENE GaLGFP.. Mb • ?lease advise. as scan as possible. Thank you in
3RUCE RCM/ .'l0. v ncor O
1UN LR NS advance f your romps attention co this matter.
:NUT MTV= M.G.
.Micua..AaL .Mb Sincerely yours,
.c n5CRY C.UANTTE4
;GREAT M. ^,AR$t
S'NALru1 ME
^ 11
RS ,UREA LYONS. ^ ' G
4R �(Ay,'fr�(J•a.N
, AT ;BEEN
:EGRGE 3E.M1107 Mr. Sal Edwards
+
RS "MET nail.
RS 'NTYN SNEAREL. ?resident
MRS rAECGGRE ti Una 2. L. A. County Chapter
:ERNMG LEVI"
•IRVET SI O E
8.E: CAC
: C °_ 3 :0 5 -• avENUE • NE's YCPK NEw v.CRK I00!3 • t2 3 35 - 0d03
Cr,Crl :334 aro aact eo - .neaten , nto neuromuscular :ISOrCef. ^.CtuCtne L ^.e muscular ev$ttCOnlel. In4 rnyOmres. amvotroonic
arras ,C :erC113 'LSi aro C' ^e1 1Otnal muSCwar itrcentel. ano :r0vsoel services 10 (nose atfiiC:el 0v (nese Ciseasel.
•
_ :fLt , �.u_. _, _
� �
� C G'/�rrs�..
��o
DATE: June 11, 1980
T0: HAROLD C. '�lILLIAMS, P.E., City Engineer
rROM: i{EN H. ROSENFZELD, Civi1 Engineer Associate �t�'`
� SUBJECT: CURB NUMBERING LICENSE REQUEST
�Sr. Sacic Dameron, 9256 Raplif£e ;2, Downey, Ca, Telephone
No. 631-0794, has requested a curb numhering business
license from the City.
�SZ�. Dameron is a private individual who recently started
in this business and is presently working in the City of
Downey painting cusb aiunbess.
His operation consists of rirst contacting the resident,
then painting the curb numbers and charging a 53.00 service
`ee per house. �ir. Dameron indicated that he does not paint
all curbs in advance and then try to collect from the
residents.
�Lr. Sid Lee of Department of Building and Safety �or the
City.of Downey indicated that .�r. Dameron had received a
permit from the City last month to do curb numberinq and
as of this date, he had not received any related complaints.
It should be noted that Fire Chief Lathrope told me that
curb numbers which are fr=sh are Extr2melv helpful to the
Fize Depart�nent when trying to �in a residence. Quite often,
houses either do not have numbers on the structure or they
are obscurred by trees and bushes.
In conclusion I can find no reason to derfy Mr. Dameron's
request for a business license to oerform curb numbering.
�r. Dameron will be awaiting a call °rom the City pending
this decision. He then needs to fill out a permit form in
the City Clerk's oEfice and file a SZS.00 prorated fee.
�_'terwhich the City Council will aoorove or deny the request.
APf'D(/E ��� f� �9�0
� �� � �
C/TY EN6/^/EE�`
_,_--__<
� _,.. ...__
� �
------------ �
II�,V � � ,
� � �
June 17, 1980
To: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
From: Tommy J. Davis, City Manager
• Subject: FISCALRYEARON980UBgg�T TO LIMITATIONS Iv
Background:
On November 6, 1979, the voters of California approved
Proposition 4 which added Article XIII B to the State
� Constitution. The purpose of this initiative is to
place limitations on the appropriations of state and
local governments� taking effect on Juiy 1, 198�• There
is currently a bill before the legislature that will
, implement Proposition 4 through the clarification of
definitions, setting uniform formulas for limitation
calculation, and determining exemptions. It is highly
unlikely that this proposal will be adopted prior to
Ju1y 1, 1980; therefore, the attached computation is
subject to amendment should pending legislation be
approved.
Proposition 4 permits adjustments to the base year
appropriations of fiscal year 1978-�979 for changes in
the cost of living or per capita income, whichever is
less, and changes in the population oi the City to
determine the appropriations limit for fiscal year
1980-1981.
While implementing legislation is yet to be enacted,
sufficient informa•tion is available to enable the City
of Lynwood to comply with the spirit of Proposition 4
and make the necessary computation to determine the
appropriation limitations for fiscal year 1980-1981
before Ju1y 1, 1980.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the
attached resolution setting the 19�0-1981 fiscal year
appropriations limit for the City of Lynwood.
� ` _+��':'^'�A ITEM
� � ��
__—___--�
_.:, . fi i �.�', !1 ;;
� �
RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING AND ADOPTING
THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 1980-1981.
WHEREAS, the voters of California, on November 6,
1979, added Article XIII B to the State Constitution
placing various limitations on the appropriations of ,
, the state and local governments; and,
WHEREAS, Article XIII B provides that the
appropriations limit for the fiscal year 1980-1981 is
calculated by adjusting the base year appropriations
of fiscal year 1978-1979 for changes in the cost of
living and population; and,
WHEREAS, the information necessary for making
these adjustments is attached in Exhibit A; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Lynwood has complied with
all the provisions of Article XIII B in determining the
appropriations limit for fiscal, year 1980-1981•
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLUED that the appro-
priations subject to limitation in fiscal year 1980-1981
shall be $4,783,419 for the City of Lynwood.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 17th day of
June 1980.
EUGENE R. GREEN, MAYOR
CITY OF LYNWOOD
ATTEST:
LAURENE COFFEY, CITY CLERK
CITY OF LYNW�OD
" - fl.i� �tl � '
� � �
DETERMINATION OF BASE APPFOPRIATION LIMIT 1980-81
FY 1978 appropriation base subject to limit $9�462,942
(Based on total actual appropriations)
' Less non-proceeds of taxes -5,497,052
(Based on actual receipts)
Add user fees in excess of costs
-0-
Less debt service appropriations
, -0-
not subject to limitation
Base 1978-79 appropriation limit $3,965,890
Multiply percentage increase in 1.077
C.P.I. 1979-80 = 7.7%
4,271,264
Multiply percentage increase in
population from Jan. 1977 (39,950) 1.0050
to .Ian. 1978 (40,150)
4,292,620
, Multiply percentage increase in 1.113
C.P.I. 1980-81 = 11.3% (est.)
4,777,686
Multiply percentage increase in
' population from Jan. 1978 (40,150) 1.0012
� to Jan. 1979 (40,200)
Fiscal year 1980-81 appropriations $4,783,419
subject to limitation
�X�NIB �T "�"
�
, �, I� I I� :� I .
�o-��
� �
RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
APPROPRIATING UNAPPROPRIATED FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1979-8�•
WHEREAS, the Annual Budget for the City of Lynwood for fiscal
year 1979-$� provides that unappropriated monies that are defined as
proceeds of taxes to be held in prudent reserves for the purpose of
establishing funds to p�^ovide for recognized liabilities; and
WHEREAS, moni�s appropriated to establish funds shall not be
considered as restricted in availability and use, and amounts may be
adjusted between funds, as necessary, to serve the future needs of the
�I City; and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to appro-
priate all such unappropriated funds, and, in the event that the amount
of such unappropriated funds exceeds the aggregate of the following
appropriations, the exc:ess, if any, is hereby appropriated proportionate-
ly to the following acc:ounts and the budget for general and special
purposes for fiscal year 1979-80 is hereby amended accordingly:
A. Appropriation from the unappropriated balance
of the General Func9:
Special Contingency Fund $300,000
Retirement, Sir_k Leave and Vacation Fund 723,000
B, Appropriation from the unappropriated balance
of the Water Fund:
Water and Sewer Capital Improvements 825,000
C. Appropriation from the unappropriated balance
of Self Insurance Fund:
Workmen's Compensation Liability Reserve 220,000
D. Appropriation from the unappropriated balance
of the Gas Tax 2106 and the Gas Tax 2107 funds:
Capital Improvement and Street Maintenance 344,900
Activity Contingency Fund
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of Lynwood author�izes the appropriation of a11 unappropriated
funds and approves ame:ndment to the budget for fiscal year 1979
APPROVED ANI) ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 1980.
EUGENE R. GREEN, NIAYOR
CITY OF LYi1W00D
ATTEST
--- ___ n2 T_.JC1
� _. ..
LAUREPIE COFFEY, CITY CLERK � _.. --� --�'""-�� °
CITY GF LYNWOOD E ��__-----'—"' `— �
: i , ; �. �
, `• ,�,, �',
�une 17, 1980
T0: HONORABLE Mf\YOR AND CITY COUNCI n
�1
FROM: TOMMY �. DAVIS, CITY MANAGER
� .
SUB�ECT: PROPOSED SI'tE FOR CORPORATION 1�A�t2D
PURPOSE
• To pursue the possibilities of purchasing the Sears T8A
(Tires, Batteries and Accessories) store for the relocation
of the City's Municipal Garage, Street htaintenance and Water
Utility Divisions.
FACTS
' • 1. On May 19, 1980, a report was submitted to Council examin-
ing possiE�le sites for the relocation of the Corporation
Yard. (Se:e Attachment). In the report, the property
located at: Orchard and Long Beach Boulevard (Sears TBA
store) was compared to the Wright Road property which has
been proposed by the School District as a possible site
for the Ci_ty's Corporation Yard. It was estimated in the `
May 19 report there would be a savings of approximately
S1 million dollars with the development of the Sears site
as compared to the development of the.Wright Road property.
• 2. On May 19, 1980, the School District met with Council to
discuss an alternate plan for the Wright Road property.
This altecnate plan, which was prepared by an artitect,
utilized present buildings on site for the School District's
i use. The effect this change had on the original plan
prepared for the City was to reduce usable yard space for
� access and storage of equipment.
1
� 3. I have discussed the proposed Sears site with the City
hlanager's office in Compton. Mr. Bevington, Assistant
City Manager, has responded in a letter dated �une 12,
1980 (See attached).
It is the position of Compton's top staff to support
Lynwood's proposed use and annexation of the property.
They have listed four restrictions, which in our opinion,
do not interfere with our proposed use of the property.
• 4. For the purpose of examining the proposed sites, it was
necessary to estimate acquisition price of each parcel.-
In order to firm up these estimates, it will now be neces-
sary to c•etain the services of an appraisal firm to analyze
the purctiase price of the Sears property. There are suf-
ficient f'unds available in the Water Fund to proceed �vith
this appraisal.
APIALYSIS AND CONCLU;iION
• Current stafi estimates indicate that the Sears property is
the most att�cactive site foc the City's Corporation Yard based
on total cost and land utilization. In order to confirm this
conclusion, it will be necessary to obtain an appraisal of
the Sears property. It is proposed that the Water Fund be
used for acquiring this appraisal �vhich is estimated to cost
52,500.
l4hile Compton's top management staff has supported this project,
it would also be in the best interest of Lyn od to secur�e
:'.G�:;� ='_^�i,r t
� �
1 �� _
S
__-.-- ___)
'.. f ,. I ! I'�I :
.' � �
formal concurrence from Compton's City Council in regards
to our planned use of the Sears TBA center and possible
annexation of ,approximately two-fifths of an acre.
RECOMMENDATION
• City Council of the City of Lynwood directs the City Manager
to request formal concurrence of relocating the City of
Lynwood's Corppoation Yard to a site location at Orchard
and Long Beach Boulevard and the annexation of approximately
four-fifths of an acre from the City Council of the City of
Compton. Council also directs staff to obtain.an appraisal
for the purchase of property at the Sears site.
I I.`� I'. I'. I I
, � � �1
May 19, 1980
T0: THE HONORABL.E MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL �
FROhi: JIM WEAVER, ASSISTADIT CITY MANAGER �
SUBJECT: ALTERNATIVE SITES FOR CITY CORPORATION YARD
PURPOSE
This report examines possible sites and funding sources for
the relocation of the Corporation Yard consisting of the Municipal
Garage, Street Maintenance Yard and the Water Utility Yard.
ASSUhiPTIONS ,
4Yith the shopping center becoming a reality in the City's re-
development area, a decision must be made in the near future so that
proper planning can take place. This selection of the yard site
should also be communicated to the Lynwood School District as soon
as possible because some of their long range plans appear to include
a joint construction project with the City.
FACTS
s The present :cite of the city yard (See Attachment A) is within
our redevelopment area and must be moved prior to any con-
struction taN:ing place.
s The present c:onditions of the buildings are considerabl.y
poor and in :>ome areas hazardous. Both the Street Mainten-
ance and the garage buildings were constructed in the 1940s
and are in need of maJor repairs. The water utility build-
ing was constructed in the 1960s but falls short of providing
the necessar;y square footage for meter repair area and
material yard storage.
• During the past two years, two alternate sites have been
identified which might accommodate the relocation plan.
They consist of the utilization of CalTrans property along
1Vright Road, or the acquisition of the Sears property located
at Orchard and Long Beach Boulevard.
The CalTrans property, appro` mately 4.8 acres, along Wright
Road was the prior site of IVill Rod Schoo3. Once the school was
moved, the School District decided to lease a portion of the land
for their kitchen facility back from CalTrans. There have been many
suggestions as to the type of an agreement that could be worked out
between the Redevelopment Agency and the School District for relocat-
ing their Administrative Offices. This property has been suggested
for that use.
There have been tentative plans drawn of a proposal which in-
cludes the City's Corporation Yard being located on this property
along with the School District's ,4dministration and Naintenance
facilities. This pl.an is located in my office for review at your
convenience. The purpose of the plan was to obtain an approximate
cost of construction, which calculated amounted to S1•2 million
(June 1979 prices).
The School Dis>>rict has indicated an interest in discussing
some of these ideas during our hlay 19 meeting.
One additional fact that should be explained is that the freeway
plans still have not been finalized. The City Engineer has contacted
CalTrans and found they do not anticipate the Long Beach Freeway
being moved any further west (�yhich would reduce available land on
proposed site) than their initial plans indicated. However, they
did not rule out that possibility.
l. C ; ; .i
. ,,�,, ''"''�
The acquisition of the Sears propertYDueSto�themCityes financial
Sears vacated its premises (Summer '78)•
situation at that time, the degree of effort in purchasing the site
was lessened to the point that negotiations stopped.
During the past t:hree months I have been in contact with a
development company wt�ich has purchased the Sears property. Contrary
to the initial belief of Sears non-interest in selling its property,
I have received stronq indications that they are interested in
nogotiating at this t:ime.
The Sears building lies within the boundaries of both Lynwood
and Compton (see Attarhment 8). Through discussions with the City
Attorney, he is of th�° opinion that there are no legal restraints
in regards to a city purchasing property outside its boundaries.
This finding also applies to redevelopment agencies.
a Attachment C illustrates the.statistical data of our exist-
ing property with those of the aforementioned sites. The
cost estimates show a variance of $1 million.
' Wright Road $1,800,000
Sears Property 800,000*
*Cost includes S150,000, for refurbishing, fences, landscape,
office space:, etc. Thesa costs are estimates. The $1.8
million is e:stimated on increases in construction costs.
o The proposed sites offer the City adequate facilities for
the Corporation Yard. In reviewing the map (Attachmant A)
both locations offer good response time. Response time
isn't as an :important factor in Public Works as in Fire
operations, t>ut there has been a concern in prior years
when new sites have been discussed.
• 8oth sites oFfer fuel storage. This capability will save
the City up to $4,000 per year in fuel costs alone.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
The present condition at the City Yard is such that action
must be taken for relocating those City operations.
The Sears property is the most logical choice for a new Corpora-
tion Yard. The price is considerably lower than constructing a new
facility, and in fact, the construction is probably better when
compared to today's standards.
The building la.yout is adequate for the Public 1Vorks Depart-
ment. The garage wi.11 have lifts for maintenance and a fuel island
for servicing the fl.eet. The street and water will be able to park
their equipment under shelter, and will have space available for
repair shops. �1 pre:liminary layout is available for review in
my office.
The equipment :>till remaining in the Sears property should be
sold as surplus for approximately $20,000. This includes the lifts
and air compressors.
The funding source for this purchase can be made from a variety
of funds. The 14ater Fund can help supplement the Redevelopment
contribution along with assistance from grants such as the Depart-
ment of Energy for the electric cars.
14ater Fund $400,000
L R A 375,000
Other 25,000
$500,000
tCould be borro�ved from Water Fund and paid back in yearly
instal.lments.
, I: Il i :. 1'i
', � �
REC01°iMENDATION
The Council direct staff to acquire appraisal to
buildings located at the Sears property and bring
for approval, a proposal for the acquisition of the property.
I have a key available for on-site inspections of the Selease
facility. If you are interested in examining the property, p
let me know.
i � � I � u, �.
•, � r °,
CORPORATION YARD PROPOSAL COMPARISONS
Existing Long Beach Blvd. V4riqht Road
5 Z 4
Number of buildings
Total net square feet 13,026
32,000 33,400
89 000 88,000
Yard net square feet 44,000 �
Equipment shed parking 9,700
11,000 12,000
Maintenance garage
1�710 4>700 7�000
500 15,000 2,000
Fuel storage 1,000 2,000
2,000
1Yarehouse space
3,000 14,000 6,000
Employee parking
None Ample Ample
Security
Inadequate Adequate Adequate
Safety rating
Inadequate Adequate Adequate
Ade uate
Locker facilities None to poor Adequate q
Ade uate Adequate
Shower facilities Adequate q
Ade uate
Bathroom facilities Deplorable Adequate 9
Ade uate Adequate
Transfer station Deplorable 9
tlaterial bunkers
Poor �dequate Adequate
Yard storage
Poor Ample Ample
Condition of building
Poor Good Excellent
Cost estimate of
purchase or 800,000 $1,800,000
construction
ATTACHMENT C
_ ]. iY i '. u I . .
. � �r*., �
COMPARISONS OF YARD PROPOSALS �
A. Existing Corporation Yard consists of the following:
1. Five buildings with a net total of 13,026 sq. ft. of which
8700 sq. ft. i.s outlined for equipment garaging - 3000 sq.
ft. for stora@;e, 1326 sq. ft. for office, lunch room and
wash room facilities.
2. Yard area totalling some 44,000 sq. ft. and utilized £or
marshalling oi'. equipment, material warehousing, trash
transfer stat�_on, wash area, equipment maintenance, park-
ing, and fuel.ing.
3. Fuel storage _facilities are limited to our 1000 gallon
tank with dispenser underground and one 500 gallon diesel
tank above ground. Completely inadequate and not cost
effective.
4. Trash transfe:r station area is neither adequate, cost
effective or of proper design.
5. The Corporate Yard as it exists is totally inadequate to
provide public works services to the City in an efficient
cost effective manner.
B. Long Beach Blvd. location for a Corporation Yard consists of
the following:
1. Two buildings (built for an auto service center) connected
together by a 47 ft. x 70 ft. covered breezeway, including
basement and second floor areas approximately 32,000 sq.
ft. to be utilized approximately in this manner.
Building #1, 4700 sq. ft. Maintenance Garage. 4100 sq. ft.
Parts - Offices - Electric Vehicle parking. Basement
storage, Civi.l Defense Storage, locker room, wash room,
and lunch room 4100 sq. ft.
Building �2, equipment parking 7800 sq. ft. plus 3200 sq.
ft. of covered breezeway. Shop area, 1820 sq. ft.
Second floor, 9800 sq. ft. of storage.
2. 89,000 sq. f1:. of yard area, which would provide simple
room for trash transfer, wash area, equipment parking,
material bunkers, and yard warehousing and employee parking.
3. Fuel storage of approximately 15,000 gallons, should be more
than ample for the City's needs and should mean an annual
savings of $4,000 in fuel purchases alone.
4. Recovery of some auto maintenance equipment is possible,
such as hoists, compressors, etc.
B. �Vill Ro gers proposed site:
1. ��uld consist of 4 buildings totalling 33,400 sq. ft. and
utilized in the following: 7000 sq. ft. Maintenance Garage;
12,000 sq. ft. equipment shed; 7200 sq. ft. street mainten-
ance building - lunch room - locker room, Water Department,
7200 sq. ft., shops - office - women's facilities.
2. Yard area 123,320 sq. ft. to be used for emplomae
- trash transfer station - yard «�arehousing
bunkers - equipment parking - fuel island and wash area.
3. Fuel storage facilities would consist of 3-3200 gallon
underground tanks - dispensers - inventory control, es�
cost $24,000. Savings in fuel purchases should be app
imately $1600 a year.
� 1! :; ��R; i L' i
, ( �ri �1
.,,,, CRY COUNCIL
� , i .• � LIONELGADE
y � �'� Mayor
� coMP7sN � OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTA� SERVICES �cur�ci�a=asor+s
� 205 South Wiilowbrook Avenue mnxcv Fi�eR
� r��� = � Compton, Calllomia 90220 F�ovo dnrnes
(213) 537�8000, EzL 266 aoeeeT aonn+s
JANE ROBBINS
' �/� � JOSEPH 7.ROUZAN,JP.
. �'� y {�ry� CO,Y.P�O� CiryMana9er
I AWRENCE C. 9EVINGTON
!�� Atlminisbaror
l, ' d ;-� a.
June 12, 1980 " .. •
- ._ � . ..�/`�?�N:A�
V` ��Y % � �
C 1 v' �0 .
' tn,F� ,,. ,l: ` , 9g � O
Tom Davis - . !��. <R
City ?fanager ' � --S
City of Lynwood
11330 Bu11is Road
Lynwood, CA 90262
REF: Possible Purchase Of Portion Of Sears Site Ry City Of
Lynwood
Dear T1r. Davis:
My office and personnel from the Compton Planning Department have reviewed
the map which you left and have visited the site.
The City of Compton is concerned about the development of the site since
any change will affect the development possibilities of the major area
which lies in the City of Compton.
As to the particular plan which is being considered by the City of Lynwood,
the major area of concern would be continued access to the loading ramp.
Rough measurements indicated that there is approximately fifty-two feet
(52') from the Automotive Center Building to the top of the ramp.
Since any large commercial development would presumably need the ramp,
and deliveries by large trucks, I feel that at least at this time and
until the Tucure use is determined, that access to the ramp and around
the north end of the major building must be assured.
To this end it is sugdested that Lynwood could proceed to anne:c an area
20J30 feet soirth of the building with the following restrictions:
1) There would be no fences erected south of the 9utomotive Building.
2) A joint access easement eaould be established over the area
� anne:ced south oE the Automotive.Building.
3) No fences would be built closer than fiYty (_50)feet from the
northeast corner of the major building.
, I
, • � �
Tom Davis
,. Page 2
June 12, 1980
4) That the water service problem (if one exists) to the whole area
be resolved at no cost to the Compton Water Department.
Under similar restrictions, it might be possible to proceed without an
annexation/deannexation since the proposed use by Lynwood is an allowed
use in the existing zone.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the plan at this
time.
Anything, that caould materially hamper the ultimate development of the
o1d Sears site could cause additional long range deterioration to the
area, thereby hurting both Lynwood and Compton.
Sincerely yours,
. _ t_ - ' ' - , , _.
L.C. Bevington ,
Administrator
Office of Environmental Services