The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About01-09-90 PLANNING COMMISSION .�.-� �� A G E N D A LYNWOOD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - 7:30 p.m. � 11330 - �•°- �- - �, JANUARY 9, 1990 CI Y OFE NW 0 p I I CITY CLERKS OFFICE _ i JAN U 5 1989 - M I , Donald A. Dove i8 i1011i12 i2i3 i6 , I Chairperson I , � , � — . � � :,r , ....: ..__ .._ _ .. .. .. . . � ..� � i Lena Cole-Dennis Carlton McMiller i Commissioner Commissioner i John K. Haynes Roy Pryor � Vice Chairman Commissioner � I Lucille Kanka David J.Willis, � ��(Jama1 Muhsin) ' Commissioner Alternate Commissioner I I C O M M I S S Z O N C O U N S E L: Henry S: Barbosa Douglas D. Barnes City Attorney Deputy City Attorney STAFF: I Kenrick Karefa-Johnson,Acting Director Aubrey D. Fenderson � Community Development Department Planning Manager � Art Barfield Louis Moralas � Planning Associate Planning Technician i , � ! I I i � � I ' disk60:agendal2 � I - � 1 I i � I _ I .. °' ' January 9, 1990 OPENING CEREMONIES: A. Call meeting to order B. Flag salute C. Roll call of Commissioners I D. Certification of Agenda posting. E. Approval of Minutes for October 10, 1989, and December = 12, 1989 Planning Commission Meetings. � I i CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 31 (CUP 311 + Applicant: Donald Chae � � COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use I Permit to develop a Multi-Tenant retail shopping mall, at � 310o Imperial Highway in the CB-1 (Controlled Business) � zone. � � RECOMMENDED ACTION: I Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the � Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2307: A. Finding that Conditional Use Permit No. 31 will not j have a significant effect on the environment, and � certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate. I B. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 31, subject to � the stated conditions and requirements. � NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS: � � 2. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. 12 (TPM 121 � I Applicant: Jack S. Keese � COMMENTS: i � The Applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Parcel ; Map (No. 21821) to combine three (3) parcels into one (1) at � the Northeast corner of Atlantic and Elmwood Avenue, in the i C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone. , I I RECOMMENDED ACTION: � Staff respectfully requests, that after consideration the � Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2306. A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt I from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as � amended by Section 15061 b(3). ' I � , � disk60:agendal2 ' � I � � � ; 2 I j I ' I ! i i I B. Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 12, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. 3. MODIFIED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 32 fCUP 321 . Appliaant:, Margurite A. Cole COMMENTS• The applicant is requesting approval of a Modified Conditional Use Permit to increase available parking to 170 spaces for the existing Stockwell Medical Building in the HMD (Hospital-Medical zone. � RECOMMENDED ACTZON: ,' Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2309: A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt , from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3). B. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 32, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. 4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 33 (CUP 33) Applicant: �Guido Sacerio COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit to develop a Two-story duplex at 12506 Waldorf Drive in the R-2 (Two Family Residential) zone. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the , Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2310: A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3). , B. Approving conditional'Use permit No. 33 subject to the stated conditions and requirements. 5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 34 (CUP34) Applicant: Alfred Brown COMMENTS• The applicant is requesting approval of Conditional use Permit to develop a two-story dwelling unit at 4160 Carlin Avenue in the R-3 (MUlti-Family Residential) zone. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the ; Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2311: , A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3). =�,._, --�_ ' disk60:agendai2` I , 3 ' . I ._. - B. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 34 subject to the stated conditions and requirements. 6. Zonincx Ordinance Amendment No. 6(ZOA 6) Comments: The staff is proposing to amend chapter 25, the official Zoning Ordinance with respect to Multi-Tenant Retail Centers City wide. RECOMMENDED ACTION: � Staff respectfully requests, that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2312. -- A. The project is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended by Section 15061 b(3). B. Recommend that the City Council approve the findings in resolution No. 2312 waive the reading and introduce the proposed ordinance. REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS None STAFF COMMENTS General Plan Update PUBLIC ARALS COMMISSION ORALS A W OURNMENT Adjourn to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on February 13, 1990, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall Council Chambers, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California. I . I � � I . I � � 1 � 1 I I � � disk6o:aglndal2 I � i �� 4 i I I ' � .. I -,,,;;; ' -,_ •, A �ENDA ITEM N0. 1 � DATE: January 9, 1990 `l I TO: PLANNING COMMISSION CASE N0 . � v� � I FROM:" Kenrick R. Karefa-Johnson, Acting Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 31 i Applicant: Donald Chae PROPOSAL• The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to operate a Multi-Tenant Retail shopping mall at 3100 Imperial Highway in the ' CB-1 (Controlled Business) zone. FACTS• 1. Source of Authoritv Section 25-11.3 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to operate any business with respect to Multi-Tenant mall. 2. Prooerty Location and Size The subject property consists of a single lot on the south side of Imperial Highway at State Street. The subject property is irregular in shape having a site area of 479,160 square feet or approxiamately eleven (11) acres in size. 3. Existinct Land Use There is an 82,368 square foot retail building with a 2,520 square foot loading dock, and, a 17,798 square foot retail building on the northeast end of the site. The surrounding land uses are as follows: North - Public/Multi-Family East - Retail/Commercial ; Residential i South - Retail/Commercial West - Industrial I i 4. Land Use Descr�tion f The General Plan designation for the subject property is � Commercial, and the zoning classification is CB-1 (Controlled i Business) zone. The surrounding land uses are as follows: General Plan: Zoning: � � North - Commercial North - C-3 � 1 South - Commercial South - CB-1 � East - Commercial East - CB-1 I I West - Industrial West - M � � . � disk59:public � I 1 � I � � � 5. Proiect Characteristics: The applicant proposes a high tech face lift to an existing two story retail structure to accommodate a multi-tenant retail shopping mall housing 204 merchants. The first floor will consist of 136 stalls or booths ranging in size from 100 sq. ft. to 640 sq. ft. the second floor will consist of 68 stalls or booths ranging in size from 192 sq. ft. to 656 sq. ft. the second floor will house two (2) video arcades and ten (10) fast food stalls, seven hundred and five (705) parking spaces is proposed for the shopping mall. Two point four percent of the booths will be less than 200 square feet. 6. - Site Plan Review At its regular meeting on November 22, 1989, the Site Plan Review Committee approved the proposed project, subject to the conditions in the attached Resolution. 7. Zoninu Enforcement History None of Record 8. Public Resoonse � � None of record � ANALYSIS AND CONCLIISION• � 1. Consistencv with General Plan The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning � classification of CB-1 (Controlled Commercial) and General I Plan designation of Commercial. Therefore, granting condi- tional use Permit No.31 will not adversely affect the Lynwood I General Plan. i 2. Site Suitabilitv � � � The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the � proposed development relative to structures, parking, walls, I fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. ( Imperial Highway is a major arterial and is well suited to carr the � y quantity of traffic the proposed development would � generate. � 3. Compatibilitv � The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of com- mercial developments; therefore, the project will be compat- � ible with the surrounding land uses. However, residential I uses are adjacent and taest of the proposed use. ' 4. Compliance with Development Standards � The proposal meets the development standards required by the Zoning Ordinance with respect to setbacks; lot coverage; � building height and density. , I i � I I disk59:publi;c i , 2 I � • I ; ---------_�-- _. i 1 � J 5. Conditions of Approval The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. 6. Benefits to Communitv The proposal will assist in upgrading the commercial use of the property and support the Commercial designation of the General Plan. 7. Environmental Assessment Staff has found that no substantial environmental impact will result from the proposed development; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been filed in the Community Development Department and in the office of the City Clerk. I RECOMMENDATION: I Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the I Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2307: j f 1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 31, � will not have a significant effect on the environment I and certifying the Negative Declaration as Adequate. � I 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 31, subject to ; the stated conditions and requirements. i ' ATTACHMENTS: ( 1. Location Map I 2. Office Correspondence, Sheriff's Department � 3. Resolution No. 2307 ; 4. Site Plan � i I i ; i � � I I I � disk59:public j I 3 i i I j . . LOCATION iVIAP _ _ _ � ,-. 11 l711 1 4 I39 02 103 I�' 1 05 --_�,•• �, 5a 6^ t�i 50 9 sa — i � \^ 4�„ NUE � � '(r� e ` 6766 n � �I� o� ro"� M p �E 9 � '4' ^. � . ...e � � � � 15 fti � . .\ '-I . _ \ i 5 : ,* � , a. � • 5L ' Y - �� OAKW000 � � p 1 � J . �+ \ . ' $ . : . . . b ;. , n . . o �, � �s � � ` , . �, AVE• �.. <. I "� � 5i I 3 SI I 50 U C 17 16 U� IO I o ��& �� ''� 'i R �_ � —s--� i 3 � 7 73 71 71 ID bl 6b 67 66 65 bd 6� 62 �I 60 59 ry �° \� � ro� � .pabd � s m ut n��s�e N �pY J • li'( 6 r G Id .. I 37 10 dl �n �� G 9 T � � 5 �� 5` 3 � II Il 1.11 1 16 IB1910 11L'2d S 762T7A1 9 3� � Q m � i� a i � . c � 7 C' ,.' pd`i3'G ' 1�, ; ' s }� �\t R" 1 0 ^ \\ IGHWAY $ /MP£R/AL ��9 0 � ^ ^ . w °'o ^ ° ' J 1-. �' � n � � 16 u il ^Ill� �m6� � .: � , n� �•• � - tl. , �177 I 60 65 W6 609 5 �� t tn . . y �'� � .. � • i 4 0 � \ l �v ? ' ' ' \l M � . t � t { 7 i6 U D I 71 37 lli IU 115a R6 15� . F� - i5 II 19 0 11 1 ^� � n', �'P� A� .1 . �' �f y R I/ . I ' � a 8 �t R V � LS � y h r 1\1 �, ti. a' .o :V ° .e 71 su se. 4 w _ �_ __ —_ —_ - _ . S 94' � / ��.�'�kU� � � �� AVE• � _ eon �' / A � � � > ' ! o p ' o � � � "� W Il L)I w� �O� pS�" �1 0 0'� ' IIP J�/� � 1� h� \7� M1'i ` � ` 5" �"' i t h '� • r ° �`� • ocebl �_�/l�i/.� y �Zl7 ZI8 tdl 146 14 ZI4 � 1 � ' z //7✓ a ob —�� y i � s ;* � r a � 78 � 37 <� IS 4 ��`+ � i � e y iai} •i� 36 s u � s1i u S �2i 76 ._ j ai ' �YI3 6 "' ; 6 t5 6 G •liai� — !I 7 S � v, � tlilt 7 •l47i8!/ L Zy n 733 15d 155 I56 1 ��i . a � O ' 7dbj � d0 9 .._. � P n c` n�'' � ?� s 1Z .1/�p li.� �'J3x 39 � \ �N 4 � ro m r ' � �I b • 3�7 W � �� 3d ' , ` y � l�� xi ¢ ' Y77 it �� a �t » , SANBORN � . � q I � t I �36 (7 � , . A4F� /B l3/ y; JS II/ J37. ' � n� e n I � 30 �5 ' ro n � � � /5 /l� • /�J34,;9 16 s` Ip I!D !q II6 IIS , 5 � � i7 y i6 � (� 3tZS � t � Q nvo�i � �8 �ia 7 f . i Al� ,� t t � t � b �0 q� k� iia c 10 � �� ` � a /J . Q � , • . I5o . �,.. �,,, pq GFj FF 'QN� '� Q p 16 � z . C F �O bk P � a u �� 1/ e OSi Q � • ' �CT � *. � . � r iirv� �PiC \ � 6 , ,� � Q � � , ; t v Q f . fR,y 'e9i�v �G e.� � � ,�__. i � v ' • o ' �. ' I S 7 '� I/ + � � . '. Ni 6 )I � 67 6 �� a . $ ' ...,��e ' � 6/ p � . � . � . ,: I �, � 7 � '• M � `-� 1 � � . . , rr /9. �y i. I �Ql/77,. i C �� 1 N L '' � ;;: ; f' , 4. � ! RESOLUTION N0. 2307 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 31 FOR THE OPERATION OF A MULTI- TENANT RETAIL SHOPPING MALL AT 3100 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY IN THE CB-1 (CONTROLLED BUSINESS) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, 90262 WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and . " WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal will not have a negative effect on the environ- I ment, and has therefore declared a Negative Declaration for the � project; and � WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for I development of a Multi-Tenant Retail outlet in a CB-1 (Controlled I Susiness) zone. ! I Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and deter- � mines as follows: i A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and ' shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, ; landscaping, driveways and other development features � required by the Official Zoning Ordinance. B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, I will not have a negative effect on the values of ; surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger i the public, health, safety, or welfare. C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current i zoning regulations and site plan submitted and approved � by the Site Plan Review Committee. D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not ' adversely affect the General Plan. ( E. The proposed development will aid in esthetically , upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in i fostering other quality Commercial developments. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, � based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby � approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 31, provided the j following conditions are observed and complied with at all times. I i i f � I i � � � i � disk6l:cup31 ; I � f + 1 i � . � , , � , , 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building code and the Fire code. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon or increase number of vendor/vendor space or reduction in square feet of any booth size, shall first be reported to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, for review of said Conditional Use Permit. 3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. 4. " The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, under- stands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution i prior to issuance of any building permits. � REDEVELOPMENT DIVISION I 5. At least one (1) off-street loading space shall be provided � and comply with the following provisions: I a. The minimum dimension shall be not less than fourteen I (14') feet in width by 25 feet in length. I I b. All loading spaces shall have an unobstructed height of ! not less than 14 feet. ' c. All loadinq and unloading shall be accomplished out of � the public right-of-way in adequate reserved loading ; areas on the premises. I 6. Seven (7$) percent of the gross lot area shall be I landscaped. I a. Such landscaping shall be maintained and an automatic sprinkler system shall be installed. Said landscape plan I including proposed plant material shall be approved by � the Planning Division. I b. All areas not occupied by buildings, parking spaces, or � approved walkways shall be landscaped with a mixture of i ground cover, trees, and shrubs. , 7. A. All signage shall be approved by the Economic Develop ( ment Division prior to installation. � B. No sign cabinets or sign cans, with or without internal � illumination, shall be used. � i 8. The center shall be equipped with a burglar alarm and public i address system. Applicant must also provide a.full security plan to be submitted to and approved by the Community � Development Department. Without this approval the i certificate of occupancy will not be issued. The tenants � will therefore not be able to occupy the building. i 9. All uses are to be conducted indoors, exclusively, except � for eating areas and flower and plant sales where approved by Conditional Use Permit. I r disk6l:cup31 � � i 2 i � � I i . � ,, _, 10. Area of Vendor Space. The minimum floor area of each vendor space shall be four hundred (400) square feet or as indicated on a plan approved by the Community Development Department. 11. Number of Vendors per space. There shall be no more than one (1) business licensed issued per vendor space. 12. Uses to be kept within spaces, indicated in final floor plans reflecting the CUP conditions of approval as approved by the Community Development department. 13. All vendors are to sell at retail and the use of a cash register is required. 14. Authority to sell. Each vendor shall have receipts or other evidence of legal ownership or authority to sell those items which are dis- played for sale. The Director of Community Development may initiate quarterly audits of vendors sales records in the Lynwood Market place cost of which shall be carried by the market place management. 15. Prohibited items. � i It is unlawful for any person to sell, exchange, barter, or � trade the following items of personal propety at a multi- � tenant retail center: a. Used property, other than items which may be sold at an � "antique store" as defined in Section 25-2 of this code. I b. Firearms, ammunition, explosives, fireworks, or other � weaponry. I c. Any item of personal property from which the serial � number or identifying number had been removed. . � d. Any item of personal property which requires a special I permit from the City of Lynwood, County of Los Angeles, State of California, or other government body when such � permit had not been obtained and displayed in the vendor � sales area. i e. Any item of personal property whose sale is prohibited by � law or is not permitted at the location of the vendor j sales area. � f. Alcoholic beverages except for on-site consumption within � i bona-fide restaurants. � g. Auto parts, oil or similar fluids, hubcaps, wheels, I batteries, or tires. i ; disk6l:cup31 3 i � 1 16. Interior design. Interior area shall be uniformly designed with colored elevations and a signage program, to be approved by the Director of Community Development or his/her designee. The certificae of occupancy will not be issued without said approvals. Building permits shall also be obtained for interior construction, where required by Code. Colors, . textures, and materials used shall be consistent in all vendor spaces and aisle areas. 17. Walls. Vendor spaces shall be constructed of solid walls and built , " up to the ceiling using wood or metal studs and drywall, taped, textured, and painted; glass; brick; or other material generally used for permanent building construction. Specifically, scissor-type gating, pegboard, wire fencing, metal grating, or similar materials, shall not be used to _ separate vendor spaces. 18. Door and gates. I Vendor space doors shall be of solid wood, metal or glass i material, all painted, and roll up or otherwise fold out of I the way during business hours. Scissors gates and chain link fencing may not be used to close vendor space. All j vendor space doors shall be of one uniform type within each � multiple-tenant retail center. � i 19. Interior finish. I All walls, ceilinq, and floors in lobbies, vendor spaces, ! and aisle areas shall be freshly painted or sandblasted, of � new material, or otherwise in a newly finished condition prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. I 20. Furnishings. � I All stall spaces shall have permanently mounted fixtures and I furniture, similar to that found in large fashion malls and major department stores. No lightweight folding tables or ! chairs or residential lawn furniture shall be used in any j vendor space. I 21. Aisles. I I Aisles shall be eight (8') feet in width, and may not be ' used to display merchandise or to locate furniture. Provide I for eating/resting areas outside of the aisle on both floors specifically in the vicinity of the food booth on the second floor. i 22. Restrooms. � Separate restroom facilities for men and women shall be i provided on the premises and be open to the public, free of I charge. These facilities sha21 be made accessible to the � the handicapped, and shall be located on the first and I second floor. I I � disk6l:cup31 i 4 � I I ,� 23. Noise control. No loudspeaker or sound equipment shall be used in a multiple tenant retail center or in any vendor space thereof which can be heard from exterior areas of the premises or from adjacent property including public sidewalks. 24. Business hours. Each multiple tenant retail center shall be open to conduct business a minimum of four (4) days a week, at least five (5) hours per day. The hours of operation shall be restricted to those between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m., except bona-fide restaurants within the center. The hours of - operation may be extended by the Community Development Director or his/her designee under special circumstances evidence in a written report prepared and submitted by the permit applicant. 25. Inspection. The vendor sales area and other area of the multi-tenant retail center which are open to the public shall be subject to reasonable inspection by City staff and other officials at all times. No operator or vendor shall restrict such inspections. A copy of the vendors lease agreement must be i in the vendors space at all times. ( � 26. Insurance. i Operators of multi-tenant retail centers shall procure and i maintain a policy of public liability and property insurance , providing for a combined single limit of protection per i accident for with such insurance company as meets with the , approval of the City Attorney. A certificate of insurance � shall be provided to the City in such form as requested by � the City Attorney. ' - i i 27. Commercial services. i Operators of Multi-tenant retail centers are, at all times, i held responsible for the proper disposal of all trash as I well as the centers upkeep. 28. It is unlawful for any person, partnership, organization, or j corporation to operate a multi-tenant retail center in the � City of Lynwood unless a business license has been issued by � the Office of the City Clerk, and business license fee � established by ordinance or resolution of the City Council � has been paid. Each vendor within the retail center is required to apply for a business license. � � 29. Special permit required. I No person, partnership, corporation, or organization shall I operate the business of multi-tenant retail center in the City of Lynwood without first obtaining a special permit in � accordance with Section 17.75 of the Lynwood Municipal code ; and paying the established permit fee. � � � I � f � disk6l:cup3li I 5 i � I 30. Upon receipt of an application for a special permit for multi-tenant retail center, the Sheriff's Department shall proceed to investigate the matters set forth therein, including the character of the applicant and the character of the persons who will be directly managing the multi- tenant retail center. 31. Transferability of license and special permit. The business license and special permit required for the operation of a multi-tenant retail center are not transferable to any other person, partnership, or organization. They are personal to the applicant and shall terminate upon request of the subject multi-tenant retail _ center. If the license and the permit are held by a corporate or organizational entity they shall terminate upon a transfer of the majority interest in said corporation or organization. 32. Vendor lease provisions. The operator shall cause the following to be included in the vendors' leases or subleases and shall vigorously enforce such provisions by eviction remedies for a single violation. i a. Vendor's obligations. , Violation of the following items a through h shall be i considered a default and major breach of this lease, remedial by eviction of violator. i b. Each vendor shall, at all times during operation, have an � operable cash register at the sales area which is capable I of, and does, record each sales transaction. The vendor � shall maintain the record of sales transactions with numerical sequence of receipts recorded by such cash j registers for a period of one year. The vendor shall � permit inspection of such register records by the City of Lynwood, or its authorized agent. c. The vendor shall comply at all times with the California i law reqarding collection and payment of sales taxes for i each sales transaction, and designate its location in the � City of Lynwood as the point of sale for each transaction I which is in whole or part negotiated at the vendor's sales area. The vendor shall issue to its customers a sales receipt for every transaction conducted. � d. The vendor shall submit to the City of Lynwood legible ( copies of its quarterly Board of Equalization sales tax returns. � e. The vendor shall obtain and maintain, on display in its sales area, available for inspection by any person, a I business license issued by the City of Lynwood, the Board of Equalization permit issued by the State of California, i and any other permit, including but not limited to a � health permit, special use permit or fire permit which j may be required by the City of Lynwood, the County of Los ; Angeles, or the State of California for the operation of i tHe vendor's specific type of business. i f. The vendor is required to accept for return defective � merchandise £rom customers. � I i disk�6l:cup31 ; � � 6 � I � � I I g. The vendor has been given copies of the Conditions of Approval contained herein, has read and understood them, and will comply with his/her obligations as listed above, and with the conditions contained in the Special Permit issued by the City of Lynwood to the Operator. h. The operator shall submit to the Director of Community . Development a copy of each vendors lease agreement for review and files. Lease must all be submitted to approval of vendors business license applications. 33. A trash enclosure must be located on the rear portion of the • property in such a manner as to be accessible to refuse collection vehicles. 34." Small trash containers must be conspicuously located throughout the center for customer use. 35. Violations; Misdemeanor. A violation of the conditions is a misdemeanor punishable as provided in Section 1-8 of the Lynwood Municipal Code and other violations are punishable as provided in Section 21667 of the Business and Professions Code and/or Section 496 of � the California Penal Code. (See attachment) � I PLANNING DIVISION i I I 36. This permit shall become void one hundred and twenty (120) I days after the use permitted has been abandoned or has I ceased to be actively exercised. I I 37. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood I main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving I the proposed development. � i 38. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance � with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the � Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. � 39. The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs I combined with ground cover as follows: One (1) five (5) gallon shrub for each 100 square feet of landscape area; and � two (2) fifteen (15) gallon trees for each 500 square feet I of landscaped area. 40. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landsca ed � and shall consist predominately of plant materials except I for necessary walks, drives and fences. � I 41. Improvement shall be completed within six (6) months from ! date of issuance of building permits. I I 42• Prior to the installation or construction of any masonry � ' wall, the property owner shall obtain a permit for and ( , submit the following information to the Planning Division: ; ' a. Simple plot plan showing the location of the masonry wall � in relation to to property lines, lengths, proposed i materials, and openings or gates to provide access for vehicles, and pedestrians. i � i (' disk6l:cup31 .� i I i � ; i i I , +i � � ;' � i �; � � i b. For masonry walls (as defined in subsection 25.2.1) a building permit shall be applied for in addition to the plot plan described above. All masonry walls of any height shall meet the requirements for masonry construction as defined in Chapter 24 of the Unified Building Code. A fee based on the valuation of the proposed construction shall be paid to the Building Department. c. All Masonry walls shall be required to maintain adequate pedestrian access for the purpose of safety and convenience. A thirty-six (36) inch or three (3) foot clear gate or opening shall be provided to all enclosures for pedestrian and wheelchair access. Pedestrian and - vehicular access shall be provided separately. d. All masonry walls shall be required to be installed with a finished, aesthetically pleasing side facing out toward adjacent properties or the public right-of-way. 43. Section 25-35.4 Additional Conditions. The Planning Commission may impose such conditions as it may deem necessary to effect the purposes of this ordinance, either upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit or upon future review. 44. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment, swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical devices shall be located within the rear yard or street side yard of a corner lot. Such equipment shall be screened from , surrounding properties and streets and so operated that they I do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring � uses, in accordance with the City�s Noise Ordinance. 45. Any violation of said conditions in this resolution may result in revocation or modification of the Conditional Use ' Permit by the issuing body at a regularly scheduled_meeting. � i I � BUILDING DEPARTMENT � i i I 46. All plans required to be submitted for approval will meet I the requirements of the 1985 edition of the Uniform Building I Code, Plumbing, and Mechanical Code, as well as the 1987 Edition of the National Electric Code if submitted before December 31, 1989. If submitted after December 31, 1989, plans must meet the Building, Plumbing, and Mechanical Codes with California Amendments. � � 47. All plans for this building for tenant spaces, remodeling � and use, shall be done in conformance with the Uniform Building code, Chapter 7(Appendix), Division 1, for Covered ; Mall Buildings, 1985 Edition (before Dec. 31, 1989) or � Chapter 56, Covered Mall Buildings, 1988 Edition of the � Uniform Building Code (after December 31, 1989). � 48. Required exits for the Second Floor are required to meet j width specifications as outlined in Chapter 33, Uniform � Building Code, due to additional occupant load. � � disk6l:cup31 � � 8 � � i I I 49. Restroom facilities must conform to Uniform Building, and Plumbing codes, as well as Health Department regulations due to the expansion of use for Multiple Tenant usage. FIRE DIVISION 50. Calculate occupant loads for each floor and show that exit capacity can accommodate the occupant load. Also travel distance to an exit shall not be greater than 150 feet. 51. occupancies where cooking equipment is installed that emit grease laden vapors must povide an automatic fire extin- guishing system in addition to the required portable extin- guisher. 52. Provide a 2A Fire Extinguisher within 75 feet travel dis- tance of any point in building. In addition a 2A-lOBC extinguisher is required within 50 feet of any electrical/mechanical equipment. Multi-purpose extinguishers may be provided. I 53. All automatic fire extinguishing systems and supervisory I equipment attached to those systems are required to be I serviced every five (5) years. The sprinkler system at 3100 Imperial is due for service in Fall 1990. This service shall be performed by a licensed contractor (C-16 License). i The contractor shall contact the Fire Department prior to � servicing the systems. A report of the service shall be I provided to the Fire Department. � Item #58....is provided as information only at this time. I •� 54. Provide exit signs and emergency lighting so that exits are � clearly visible from all areas, i.e., not obstructed by i walls surrounding the vendor's enclosed area. � PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DIVISION ! � i 55. Provide documentation that lots composing the property were I legally tied together to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. After reviewing the documents, the Depart- ment of Public Works may require the submission and recorda- I tion of a parcel map or lot merqer. 56. Dedicate a ten ft. (10') wide strip of property along Fern- � wood Avenue and 5 ft. on Apricot Street. i 57. Dedicate required property at the Northeast corner of State Street and Fernwood Avenue. � I 58. Construct new sidewalk, curb and gutter, drive approach(es) � and required pavement along Fernwood Avenue. I 59. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk, curb/gutter, drive I approach(es) and pavement along State St., Imperial Awy., Peach St., Beechwood Ave., Apricot Ave., and Grape Ave. � I disk6l:cup31 i I 9 I i I 60. Close existing drive approach and construct proposed drive approach(es) Per City standards. 61. Construct wheelchair ramp(s) at all the alley type entrances to the property and at the Southwest corner of Peach St. and Beechwood Avenue. 62. Construct five foot wide planter to separate the sidewalk from the parking lot along Fernwood Avenue. 63. Install 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood standards along Fernwood, State St., Peach Ave. and Seechwood Ave. 64. Construct tree well covers per City of Lynwood standards for � existing and proposed street trees. 65. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all off-site improvements. 66. All required water meters, meter services changes and/or fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired I by the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from , the Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing i any work. � 67. Trim all of the on-site trees overhanging public property. + 68. Prepare and submit a traffic impact engineering study com- i pleted by a City approved Engineering firm. Based on the results of this survey the city will vacate street(s) and � require closure of drive approaches and streets. i 69. Prepare a street improvement plan for widening of Fernwood � Avenue and for street closures as referenced in item 73. 70. Closure of drive approaches and streets as required as referenced in item 73. I 71. Proponent will pay for the title report and all related fees � in conjunction with street dedications. 72. Restripe pavement markings in thermoplastic and replace i missing pavement markers as required by the Engineering Division. � I 73. Vacate Grape Street. i Section 3. A copy of Resolution No. 2307 shall be I delivered to the applicant. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of January, 1990, by i members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: I � I � � disk6l:cup31 I 10 I i I AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAZN: Donald Dove, Chairman APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Acting Douglas D. Barnes Director Community Development Deputy City Attorney Department I � _ � � I � I � i I � � � i I i � i� disk6l:cup31,! i , 11 ( 'I I � � '� �—� �-.....'_'""....,-.sa.�v.�a.�. .. : �.. .. _._._ _ .'.i,`��N!'i.�x"�Ee.�7R,y"�'. , � • . . :� � : � ��+�`,�-�� r e.Tm: � s'y �� 7 t . . . .,� .�! , � ' J ��E _ fi ' �` r � � �, � . o �— m . � �� .! I� � �Ya �.�y y�SL� ��i '} a� Y � 4 � V .�� 3�,-.r r^ ��..,� � r r �.w+�..$ �5�''x v �'.�..: s�` 4 , !Z �. � �� .�r ' �"�,�i; - �- , N ' .��,�, +�. �_� � , ,` ` , COUNTY OF LOS 71NGELES SHER I FF ' S DEPAR�I'MENT s OFFICF CORRFSPONDENCE FROM: Sgt. Harry Estep TO: City of Lynwood Lynaood Station Community Development Dept. SUBJECT: Site Plan RevieW for "THE MARRET PLACE" The applicant, Mr. Donald Chae, proposes a hiqh-tech face lift to an exieting commercial structure located on approximately eleven (11)•acres of land, near Imperial Highway and State Street in tAe City of Lynwood. Renovation of the existinq structure, a failed Montgomery Ward Department Store, vould include an improved interioz to accommodate a multi-tenant retail "shopping mall", hosting two hundred and four (204) merchants. The project wouid I reportedly require an initial commitment of two million dollars - (52,000,000.) for capitol improvements and a fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.) monthly advertisement budget. .L �� After being dazzled by the colorful artist renditions of the , elevations one is still faced xith the physical layout of interior. I ;a i � The first floor consist of one hundred and thirt � y-six (136) stalls � or booths, ranginq in size from 100 square feet to 640 squaze feet. ' The average stall sise is calculated to be less than 400 square I � feet. The stalls are constructed of 8 feet hiqh qypsum board ;� partitions. This provides for 6 or more feet of open apace between � : the partition and the ceilinq to allow air flow and use of the � existing fire sprinkler system. It was not made clear as to how or if the fzonts of the booths r+ere to be enclosed. The merchant's ' stalls aould be accessed by six (6) 300+ foot lonq, Nortn-South, and four (4) 250+ foot long, East-West, 8 foot wide halls+ays. The most formidable allocation of leasable space is one restaurant ! parcel of 4008 square feet. , The second floor consist of sixty-eight (68) stalla or booths � I ranging in size from 192 square feet to 656 squaze feet. The � average stall size is calculated to be less than 432 aquare feet. � These stalls are also constructed of 8 feet hiqh qppsum board partitions with adequate apace above to provide for air f1oW and use of the fize sprinkler system. , - 1 - � i i i i i � I � i y� �C .� �+ ; . � „+ W � . .,y�:. . ��'i s.'st_,' . , s .. � � .i.�. .r�a. ,� Y r - ,� - `^�.. - � . . , . , . . . < �� ; � ��.,�_ - �. " : � � �� v . � , 4. 1 ' -' . a i. �� -� _ :' � . a.� !Y�` . S � . ` ' ^-�, `.�' ..�..�! . ° ' s "S,PFSr_ ..� w.- _�.. r .'2�LPR'4v:P.� -' 'E- ' _"_ . _ . . . _ ' � . «-:;"r . ,;. ,._.` :�5,';.°'�°+�.. ��r.�. �---+.,. .�..r,..�._.__�..� _ - � , g�et« �a.,.''k� � , .i. . �` . ., e � St' -. � .' .. .- ... .:3.. ti �' i �� y �� 4:�� ' � ' '-�:. "- K �.�-9:°�" r ;"�,i �..�r ti s ''�..e . u ��. � ,-. a r. ..+r .� � ��•# * ,yi-� ,V9��Tiy ' , a . � � ;� . � r r rfi. :.f. �,�..az '._,} �' ..: y Y � � k � .. �` '� �' *'a.s� � '� � �' s �� ;'�i ; +�.. .�n$. L.' � r�..Tf 3,. - -u.. ..,' ? zY�'h�r�' 7 -:`�"�� °, r..-. t- . ' 1 • The second floor is to host two (2) video arcades and ten (10) fast �i food stalls With an avezage size of 400 square feet includinq the cooking and serving areas. The second floor merchant's stalls are accessed by four (4) 300+ foot lon9, North-South, and four (4) 150 � foot long, East-West, 8 foot xide hallways. I The eleven (11) Fast-Food stands comprise approximately 11$ of the total leasable area. Using Mr. Chae's projected gzoss annual sales figures 3.5 million dollars would be generated fzom the food stands only. Neazly 2.2 million dollars would be generated from the 17 competinq Shoe stores. 1.8 million dollars aould be genezated from the 10 competing Sports related merchants. i 1 million dollars from the 5 competing Nurseries. i Nearly 1 million dollars from the 6 competing Art Galleries. Nearly 1 million dollars from the 6 competing Leather Goods stozes. In excess of .8 million dollars from the 6 competing book stores. , Over a half million dollars from the 4 competing Sheepskin stores. Over a half million dollars from the 3 competing Video Arcades. j Ovez a half million dollars from the 5 competin9 Toy stores. i Mr. Chae represents the Gross Annual receipts for• the project I should be 32 million dollars. This equates to $361.50 gross annual i income foz each square foot of �leasable space. The Carson Mall • , during the last yeaz has produced 30 millon dollars in gross sales revenues, or approximately S155.00 per square foot of leaseable � apace. The merchant's space is scheduled to rent for 53.00 per � aquare foot. This inflated rental cost is considerably hiqh, even for an established and flourishing mall. i Dr. Lee Lloyd, Professor of Urban Geography and Land Planninq at ' California 6tate University Fullerton vas contacted. Dr. Lloyd i - 2 - I i � ;I . , � �' l _. y .. ..a � .. _ . .t .C�, � . ,. ✓ ,- s- ^�-btr �'�- ' �i, r' � }�. i . ..¢__ .�, �'- _ �.. _ _, . .. _ ,_ ... �.. ' . , ` . ,� y 1: �" .": t � ' .?�v��' �. . � T v ° ? j' i$�:. � � . . .axA�. t F � ai , � y + 7� �� , ,�,. �a ,t � F TC i � . ' . .' , �j� 1 � y - . a � � y �� . _ _ N�.�.�a. nh'1��. ....�..4i . ��yty:�.�. ��:'.-Bn.v �. � ......L.�F_.� i.t� _u� ��.'��X _.... . � -_ � . ""._. .� a�?°�'.�; �'�.'---'.�.--"'-°-�-- - —r� � .. , _ +�Ni�sw — � ' ' ..ew�^'S � _. , � r y � Y . � +�.�� Y � SM . ��\ ✓`�v� M _;�+' .; . . , y � .J, < � . i'_ 2-4. ..i}� .�.°^t�� . • q,.ga . _ S: �F 'r 'v ��yy n �s�. y r �� : � �. r t � �.�,:c.,� � t � '^ t " ; �. \ u,y 1!.?..� � �i. L�` . P- ` � � � � R4� L" J[ �RC �+IC . . ... .. .. . t'r�.+.,i :�'� : n .-S+ .'R� is �. • w � indicated that recent studies had indicated that 5180.- 5200. per aquare foot median qross annual sales is considered the present atandazd in the Southern California area. An that standard is �iredicated on established and economically stable communities. 6ecurity for the location does present major problems, The maze � of inter-connecting hallways, accessing the individual booths allow for the congregation of undesirable elements and socially deviate conduct. The number of active qangs in the Lynwood area is of I paramount concern to all. The inordinate number of fast-food stands in close proximity to video arcades, video rental and record ahops could be the catalyst for trouble. The narrow hallWays inter-winding through the building lend themselves to drug trafficking and gang activity. The physical make-up of the individual merchant's booths make security nearly impossible. Discounting how or if there is a way to secure the entrances to the cubicals, the open tops provide ingress and egress for burglaries. Besides the contents of the merchant's stalls, the ability.to secure the daily receipts on the premises is questionable. The potential� of robbery or theft from I the 204 vendors or their representatives bringin9 receipts to oz fzom the location make them targets or potential victims. The management of the Carson Mall empLoyees a staff of fourteen j (14) full-time uniformed security personnel. They provide security � for the 85 independent shops and assist the security of their three � (3) major tenants. Their purpose is to be hiqhly visible and detez i disturbances and thefts. In addition to trying to resolve business � disputes, keepinq unwanted persons off the premises is a lar9e I problem. Homeless try to loiter on the premises to shelter � themselves from the elements, others to sell illicit property oz � dzugs and some to beg or con patrons. Durinq the day truants I attempt to aander about to pass away the day and at the end of the i achool day the location is flooded vith school a ed � '; are believed to account for a lar e g Persons that the same time discoura e g 9 Percentage of pilferafle and at I � q payin customers, i ' In fiscal ! I year 1988-1989 the Carson Hall Securitp reported 250 ' ahoplifters detsined from their three (3) major tenants (Sears, i Penny s and Broadway) that prosecution was not requested or the � I - 3 - j � � I : ,� �. - _, I �'- : �,. �s _ 1 � .{ _ .'b[�.,-� �+L J�' . a itlr '�'�^��w. � .�.. . -N` .. _ i _ ��'� Y ' ;_ '-��..¢ . : .- a� . w� D'i�� C� �+Y�� w . r �� 1n { � a � r .. .ye._`. �..��. � i '`', � . � . '~ � _ . _ • . ? 4 � �w. � i.� � a..:�� .w..,. :�$1 ; y��d�`�' z -l��h`_ . 'aw��" �> �._ . ' � • � . - �• "y,s� � . ��..� . ��l � �{L�N� � �` � ' .F�"� �,�- r��. < . ) +FF i .{ : .::� _ ).�� e 3� s ".��vJf�.awn ��,�(� �� `"M• � .` . S i . : ..�5 J, auf. - i �y �p`J"' �,"i � . ^A,,.. ..'... . . .....�-� � �e:r. ��.. ;H t� :vtX �^`y'Il"�'��f •. ... � '�i " .. . _. �.. .' ' �� • � • � Sheriff's Department notified. Carson Sheriff's Station reported that in that fiscal year 1988-1989 some 457 crime reports were taken at the Carson Mall. � I A dedicated internal security force Would be reguired by the volume � of inerchants and social settinq present in Lynwood to help defer I criminal activity. Even with the security measures ascribed to at the Carson Mall there Was still a noticeable utilization of police services. Some concern is also appzopriate with zegazd to the volume of i reflective glass schedule to adorn the proposed facility. Vandalism of the glass facade by persons shooting at it or throWing I rocks is not unrealistic. I i Considezing the followin9: physical layout of the location, I strongly resembling an indoor swap meet; the high density pact of I the merchants; the inherent security problems, coupled with the absence of a fiscal impact and marketing analysis with a stated ' methodology - the Los Angeles County Sheziff's Department, acting � as the policinq agency for the City of Lynwood, Would oppose the ; site usage. � ; i I � • • I I I . I � � i � j , ° � i � - 4 - ' . r i � � - � �r - � " ��= . �` «.:�. - `�,� ,� _,. - .� � :x�r'; - - �� : � ,,.. �,,� �, {�. °� 3 ''� ?' �i �'� : . �� . � ., a�- _ - s .... �, a � ._ � '' " _. -' ��[ �, � '�q . -,: . _,.. � :., . - �. -_ Rb : 4��.c._t._. 4.. �� . _ . .s�ar "'Jw ' !n . 1r 'p: 3 �' . . _. . t _ r . , ' i a rr x �, . -e . . � . >.� . ,` � . � „ , . y .1 � . . �� { l �:�- k ..� � r �Y.�. c . X � T :. : ; } � S D�� 45 +. . � l x ' r { . � :,; . � _ � � i , �. .- c ' a ...� `t < Y' ' � 1' y�: 4 e S � 3 _h s � 7 .m ' . � .r� .. ` _ .. s . _ � 3' '., r n . . ��.£,i'�� a ': y � a kf .rv1' � 5 i� t s _"' f � ��.n s ?t..� s �#' ..ti Y ' � � 't' `�. � � � �-" t. �� y 'F` t, y ^� �s.-S � c?` - � � t � �-. � � s".�,� ..a'Sr'z �r'`3. <�" .TZ K�"� ^� , �.�` m ` ..e.h� ..a e...w,t � S., r �s `y�� s"'' P sa ' T-, � 's z 'SG7i ^:s.=y1l s" r i �. Y s i. t* 6 s.� i ' r G r x :F�`- � �: ': s i a rw'4-*�M1 ��,. �• .. vy � �- t.�v . 4 .c+r t .a h r,�� c ae .F's� �. x F. 3' �} t , :i � :,,¢.. �� f - `r- ..� ] . ^( .f � C 4'�. d 'h .t R' _ 1r �� s � .. ? .� ! f ._ f� -:.1tr�,. . c.� : n �iak� � °�....r r � r''�','��,,�?c.� a. t . z .� s - r - ` . �'+' _ � . � ''t�.-' fi - `i, e ry y$!tl' �+�..4{�6'�. I'� � l` �"'� 5 !a :1 � p . �. �+ . l:^5J Y'.�' '[. : 7 . .1 ajR. l`�i. n Cy.�i u5t � F' VY . �fF�.� � �y'�`N�'�P' . y �� ' 4�.t . Y ^'^'� ?i�M'iw �` ± � Jn' �� `%l"�'2. `� J x #'� �.i Y .K LC � (,�..� Y T ..f.� �'u�S�. 'K`v}� • �i. �F,- �.°•: r . >�:.: �� S � � s 4+�i � x r� �.�'�-:s �- �' - • � � . �' e �� n'"+ �?a"� T��y �': ' F.��:SiA�� ' ��a:`Sk'""��^ � . � . .� _ �+`'�' t w�.�t � s � ,� ��,�rt, ..: .. �:�. ,. , ;`�r.,a.e�,.[� _�' ;�,?�:,F�•-• w i • � • • . � a ,� ,�: ��• ��7�`��^.. # � � � � • � �� v � �( 1�� J'. . • ' 1 •�� •� ,�� ,�• •� yptY F� z '� r 0.91'�� •' �� • . - . . �. : • � , � _ r' ., �i� :� ^��'e .�:,;'s:�' hw''�.. - ' a.r �i� : F�� :��xt._ . ;�c,�..�"�`��`t�',':?. , : � t�::� - � -'� N _ F � �� ` J � �� '.,�'�.i "�. ;1F �j `< -• ' ��.. � : � ��' � .ei- 'i�.. ` y .. � �:a� � � ' . • .�. •'i '�' • • • • • • • � Lc. . - 'T' �w.Y . � s � g ;� . �A�:'j • ••, • � a � • ��2'��rt..:r' �. s , � . �_: •• 1 • � • : •� •� - - ��:.� 11 •� :�. • � 11 _ "`f - . � .� � i. _ � f ,� : u :1 1 • •� ^� �� F .i ,* � - . �.is I�. � ��}.µ :� _ . - ya �+�RY.'vJFR � J 1 11 11 , 11 • ��f .� ' l.'r' - • � � � 1 t '` . �. ��. � 11 , 1 1 1 • 1 � 11 • .� ��y�-w"+i.�`��. � i� -1 �� x �� ,'�axi '�;, � "!'e ":�1 - - .qt�s �,t�: i ,""Y'� . - r w > ls uy � �^t: � ~!�� _ ' ;� p' ....��. =•s :G � �: . , T��,, �� . � . . ` r � : . � , o : w 4r �c' `��j'� 1 � ��R��.�, � • � . • n •_ � . � . � .ISIe4 �' n': • q y@ • � �• � •• � o � > tz �y'� ' .y� i7 � siV .� + � s �'.' . � • � �• � • � � • • � � • � ra �.C,.y.i-.+�YY��F,� . Vpr,]� � S ty� `� ' � �� • � • •� •� v • � , 1 �, , '�"��`�a �n ��r a � �'� S^C� ff�^- �� 7 i 3;i'i � �. •, : � . ,.a €`:��`� ' ''wr'' .,;r.. ' a • =': i �-: 1 c. . .� S}'�%�t��''. : i. F � ��; . � _».. ,<; ' ;' �" i ,. ► : . � �s.�"'t��cf�� '. `, *�"�r-� ^ry�,k, +..�: 1 .. . �i ".'.. . � ' •.`+�¢ cv7: : � �,.. ° ' .a-� ' � S ` � r ✓�tR + zv , � ,c � �i � 'taz^�� q � T "� � �� M ��Y9�y��a4�� . . � � �W ��N ��,' Y � '�Y� �}�� {L/ 4 f � � � . � � � �1�6�.�...tF <S_',7�, a. i ��,' s»x•'�Y �.y � ,� - LgT' � �x R> 3"_ y y o 'FN' '��'�'SQ'�T �rLr c _'� � -+�+ %�j•"'"�. , Z c s+`5 -{��.,� Y.1'-t"�d' L r rC . '" : 9 � � .r�„�"�� .�i�y.�`s5�� d� �'+Y��s �.,�'v' s�� 3�. 'a��i��if� � ` � ({� aQanF -�..� r�• p _ . . �-1 ��1C^Y�Y}47 '� j�.�. !Y ��fy� � �A � S� �4Y.�I ��T� � � � " w � T a '� K � �- F � -k�.t V7� '4s ""��'.` ' �s . w d' r � �e'.� �° 'Y i i ,-}�� £ a f�'�' r,�"�*�^' aA+�'t "�' or� : h �� f� s� 1T'v�c+ "� `�, �` � �'� �-r�. � �" Y; .yt� � �', �a.�f ,� ..:s'Z- �� t ," -� r ,.., k t+t X �a.a�'`E ��i' � i s-a7p ,.n,'f�`'. s s Y.i � � r' � ~ `'�-"'r r t n � . ;. ,�� M � � :� � � y � _� �� " ,�� M,��,�� *�`�-. � Srri� R� y .e.. � ...C�r� .'.s�s- -�.� : � �'ne�' � Y a ,. � 7 � dc s �� a r_ e� `� �rip'�''�. �o- , �.a"'Ra",� r s Lt�r'� ! ` �•t '�`x - 'tr 9 � . :.r ��'' �. ..r"y�'�'� q prr3le��iR«ri'.. r +."�� 1 `.i`t� `� ,_ y �...�. �f � r,i� ... f . t y `��'eci� i 't-'��'`. �-4' > x ,- : -3 .'�'Y.i>� 4' °� _�'�.c.i a.i - ., 9" ° .s�'+i�vk._ 3 �'':.+�R "ir fr -.�� q� � a b " �` ��' ",�f +�.LGly; y.x �F,!1':rt^.�' "� � � y.. �v t +r t i x .� ; ..✓ .. ^�' .. s ' � t 1 .�} : +4- K . r:a.�I�"" .�o , ,. , t+ �,:;. � i ; . +E, n'.,;�" rn+ � n W x s.. � r a - . .s ..c i . .�.. '.� _ os _ , t � : ...y�� -. .5.,, - -T'��a � � �-.r� �..� r y� � ...t�� 2'�F j i�1�s.t- r,y�Yr? d t ��S � } �+l �R i� i�':t �' ^ r.TI ` Y' � � �^'Y � Yx�� I � N , �, � V � 1L )p J... y T Y' �� °?. `c. �. Z . Y",: i ,�i � +.S'y..n.�-. >�y�s-i �s.'i? 4 y s.�.' a... _ .L.7i sb .�.i • - . .�, . . -'�t ..�. � r`_.r . . 'a:vr.D , _. . . . ,,: ,°�,�.. , f � ."�:J� 25-25.10 Pre_es:;sting_Conditiona� Use a. A conditionnl use.legally established prior to the sffective date of wn ordinancc regulating cuch conditional use ahall be permitted to continue, provided it is wbated a�s prescribed in Sub�ection 25-13.6 and it is operated and maintained in iccordance with wpplicable Zcning Ordinance requirements in �ffect at the time of its establishment, b. Alteration or expansion of a pre-er,istinp conditional use shall be permitted only upon the granting of a use permit as prescribed in this section, provided that alterations not exceeding two thousand five hundred.(�2,SOO.C�O> dollars in value as'Cetermined by tfie Planning Director and the Huildinq Inspector . ;hall be permitted withaut gr�nting a conditional use permit. c. A conditional. use permit shall be required tor the . r-QCpnstruction of a structure housing a pre conditional use if the structure housing a pre-exicting conditionel use if the str��cture ie destroyed by fire or other calamity� by act of God� or by the public enemy to a qreater extent than fifty (50%) per cent. The er.tent of dam�ge or partial destruction shall be based_ upon the ratio of the estimated cost of restoring the structure to its condition prior to such damage or partial destruction to the estimated cost of duplicating the entire ��,, structure as it shall be reviewed and approved by the City �. Engineer, .Planning Director, and Etuiding Inspector and shall be based on the minimum cost of construction in compliance with the Ruilding Code. (Drd. Nc. 1107.> ; 25-2.°,.11 Modification of Conditiona7 Use r — . — �f ' Subsections iJ through 25-25.9 shall apply to an " applic�tion for modification, erpansion, or other change tn a � candition�l tise, provided that minor revisions or modifications � may bp approved by tfie Planning Director if determines that the changes would not affect the findings prescribed in � s��bsection iJ�a�jJ (Ord. No. 11�7. ) , ��LJ��J.S SusEension�_and_Reyocation Upon violation of any applicable provision of this chapter� or, if granted subject to conditions, upon failure to comply with conditions, a conditional use permit shall be suspended , autamatically. ThE Planning Commission shall hald a public , hee.ring withirt forty (4n) d�ys, in accordance with the procedure presr_rit+ed in subsecticn �J and if not satisfied th�t the regulation, general. Frovision, or condition is being complied with, may revol;e the conditional'use permit' or take such action ' ". • '=as m�ay. •be• necessar.y to, ensr.ire;.tompli,a�Ce .rii.th .�:tfig..�•reqwl�tion, t . ,•'gener�l.provisipns, or cpndition. The deci�si'on of the Flanning �� Commissian' shal] be final unless a •- ppealed to the City Counci3 _ within fifteen f]5> days' 4rom'the iiate'thee-eof. (Ord. No.' 1107.)•' '. • � I't lil • . . . . . . �,'- _ � . . . . • . . _ t � 1 � � ., � ' . � - :: . . � � _ � ; > - � ; < - � _' ,,: . � - ,. - ;. , . � . i }• � ' "';:-:��L�� 1TE11� NU. Z ► �� DATE: January 9, 1990 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION C�,SE N0. �P� 1� .� FROM: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Acting Director ! Community Development Department � i � SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 21821 - CASE NO. TPM 12 ' Applicant(s): Jack S. Keese � PROPOSAL: � ' The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 21821 for the purpose of consolidating three parcels, at 11098 S. Atlantic Avenue in the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone. FACTS L 1. Source of Authoritv Section 25-18, et seq., Subdivision Regulations of the Lyn- wood Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act, Government � Code Section 66410, et seq require that a parcel map be recorded for the consolidation of several lots into a single parcel, or more. 2. Property Location. The subject parcels are located on the northeastern corner of Atlantic Avenue at the intersection of Elmwood Avenue. (Refer to attached Location Map.) 3. Existina Land Use ; At present the subject parcels are vacant. The uses sur- � rounding the parcels consist of the following uses: = North - Commercial East - Single Family/ Multi-Family South - Commercial West - Commercial 4. Land Use Desianation = The General Plan designation for the property is Commercial I � and the zoning classification is C-3. � ; 3 ; The surrounding land use designations are as follows: � ' � � General Plan Zonina � North - Heavy Commercial C-3 ' ; South - Residential R-2 ' East - Residential R-2 West - Heavy Commercial C-3 i 6. Site Plan Review i At its regular meeting on December 21, 1989, the Site Plan I Review Committee recommended approval to the Planning ; Commission subject to the conditions in the attached � resolution. ' disk59:tpm12 � � ; , � --- � ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION Environmental Assessment. � The Community Development Department has determined that the 1 project could not have a significant effect on the environment. ! Therefore, a Notice of Exemption has been prepared and is on file '' in the Community Development Department and the office of the City Clerk. Staff analysis of this proposed lot consolidation include the following findings: (aj Design of the proposed site; and (b) Consistency of the proposed site with the General Plan. € Desian Of The ProAOSed Site Consolidation a. "The design of the proposed lot consolidation shows the con- solidated lots to be in character with existing commercial developments in the area. b- The proposal is meant for the consolidation of three lots into one in order to allow better utilization of the property. c. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of the development permitted by the General Plan and zoning ordinance in that the parcels are substantially flat and able to support the type development proposed. Consistencv Of The Site With The General Plan a. Staff�s inspection shows the site to be compatible with the City of Lynwood's General Plan as the General Plan limits land use activities to those projects that enhance the func- tion and quality of residential developments without altering significantly the character of the existing environment. b. The size and location of the proposed project does not sig- nificantly change the character of the existing environment. c. The proposed consolidation is consistent with the Zoning classification of C-3 the General Plan designation of Com- mercial. RECOMMENDATION(S): Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2306. 1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the state CEQA Guidelines as amended by section 15061 b(3). � 2. Approving Tentative Parcel Map, Case No. 12, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Resolution No. 2306 , 3. Tentative Parcel Map No. 21821 disk 59:tpm12 ' i ' RESOLUTION NO. 2306 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 21821 TO COMBINE PARCELS 52, 53, 54 OF TRACT NO. 7984 MB 90-34-36 PER MAP RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. " WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully i considered all pertinent testimony offered in the case as presented at the public hearing; and i WHEREAS, the preparation, filing and recordation of I Parcel Map is required for development; and I Section 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find , and determine that said Tentative Parcel Map No. 21821 should � be approved for the following reasons: � A. The combination of lots meet all the applicable j requirements and conditions imposed by the State I Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of � the Lynwood Municipal Code. B. The proposed combination of lots is consistent with � the applicable elements of the General Plan and the , Official Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lynwood. C. Proper and reasonable provisions have been made for ; adequate ingress and egress to the lots being combined. ' D. Proper and adequate provisions have been made for all � public utilities and public services, including sewers. , Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of , Lynwood hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 21821 in the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone, subject to the following conditions. COMMiJNITY DEVEIAPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. ; The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City � Departments. 2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he has read, understands, and agrees to the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, � before any building permits are issued. � disk59:reso2306 ' i ; , 1 ! j I I I I ; • PLANNING DIVISION ' 3. Within twenty-four (24) months after approval or conditional , approval of Tentative Parcel Map, the subdivider shall file with the City of Lynwood, a Final Map in substantial con- ; formance with the Tentative Parcel Map as approved or condi- tionally approved, and in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the City of , Lynwood. i 4. Extension of the Tentative Map approval shall only be con- + sidered if the applicant or his/her representative, submits � a written request for extension to the Community Development Department stating the reasons for the request, at least thirty (30) days before map approval is due to expire, � pursuant to, and in compliance with, Section 25-18, of the € "subdivision regulations of the City of Lynwood. �i 5. The Final Parcel Map shall be filed with the City Engineer of the City of Lynwood. . DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING 6. All conditions of the State Map Act and the City's subdivi- sion ordinance must be met prior to recordation. All matters and improvements shall be consistent with the ordinances, standards, and procedures of the City's Develop- ment Standards, Engineering Procedures and Standards, Water �. Standards, and Planting Standards of the Department of Parks and Recreation. The Developer is responsible for checking with staff for clarification of these requirements., 7. Submit a Subdivision Guarantee to this office. The final map shall be based on a field survey. All surveying for the proposed development will be done by the Developer, including the establishment of centerline ties. Enclose with the final map the surveyor's closure sheets. 8. Developer shall pay all applicable development fees includ- � ing drainage, sewer, water and parkway trees prior to issu- ance of any building permits. ! Pay Parcel map checking fees prior to checking. Pay $100 monument checking fee prior to recordation. Deposit $50 with City Enqineer to guarantee receipt by City of recorded, reproducible mylar, parcel map prior to ' recordation. All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees are to be paid prior to recording the final map. All requirements to utilities to be met or guarantee prior to recording of the final map. ' disk59:reso2306 � i 2 t �_ I . . 9. Sewers The development shall be provided with public sewers. Connect to public sewer. Provide laterals as necessary. Design of all sanitary sewers shall be approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 10. Water Svstems The Developer shall construct a water system including water services, fire hydrants and appurtenances through the devel- opment as required by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. Payment for said meters shall be made to the City prior to issuance of building permits. The Developer shall install on-site water facilities including stub for water meters and fire hydrants on interior and on boundary arteri- "al streets. All conditions of the Lynwood F.ire Department must,be met ° prior to recordation. 11. Public Easements and Right-of-Way i Where drainage, sewer and other such easements are required, j the minimum easement width shall be ten (10) feet to facili- � tate maintenance unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. � 12. Sidewalks i Design, configuration and locations shall be subject to the � approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, and the Director of Community Development. Ramps for physically � handicapped persons shall be provided both on-site and off- site as required by State and local regulations. 13. Dust Control and Pedestrian Safetv , Prior to the issuance of demolition or grading permits, the � developer shall: a. Submit a plan indicating safety methods to be provided ; to maintain safe pedestrian ways around all area of , construction. This may require proper and adequate � signs, fences, barricades, or other approved control ' devices as required by the Director of Community Devel- � opment. , i 14. The Developer shall install all public improvements, as i required by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer prior to issuance of any occupancy permits for this development. j Public Improvements shall include but are not limited to: a. Reconstruction of damaged PCC sidewalk along Atlantic ; Avenue and Elmwood Avenue. ! b. Underground all utilities. c.- Reconstruction of PCC curb and gutter along Atlantic ! Avenue and Elmwood Avenue. d. Reconstruction of pavement along Atlantic Avenue and ' Elmwood Avenue, and the rear alley as directed by the Engineer. disk59:reso2306 3 , _ � _ � � � � , e. Construction of (2) wheelchair ramps Northeast and i Southeast corners of Atlantic Avenue and Elmwood Avenue. , , f. Construct a PCC Bus Pad along Atlantic Avenue. ' g. Planting of four(4) parkway trees {2 trees on Atlantic i Avenue, 2 trees on Elmwood Avenue) along Atlantic Avenue and Elmwood Avenue. f h. Construct two(2) tree wells with covers along Atlantic Avenue. 's 15. Construct a five (5) foot wide planter to separate the � parking lot from the sidewalk area. ; '� �All changes and repairs in existing curbs, gutters, and ; sidewalks and other public improvements shall be paid for by ± the developer. If improvements are to be guaranteed, a faithful performance bond shall'be posted by the developer `- to guarantee installation of said public improvements and an agreement for completion of improvements with the City Council shall be entered into. Submit Policy of Insurance or bond protecting City against damage or injury to persons or property growing out of, related to, or resulting from improvements or work. The Director of Public Works/City Engineer will determine amount and form. Deposit with the Director of Public Works/City Engineer before commencing any improvements, a sum estimated by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to cover cost of inspection of all improvements under his jurisdiction. 16. Remove existing tree in conflict with the proposed drive approach on Atlantic Avenue and replace with one(1) 24" box . parkway tree. Type and location will be determined by the Department of Public Works. 17. The water meter in conflict with the proposed drive approach Atlantic Avenue must be removed and a new meter with new service line must be installed by a developer. Installa- tions must be completed by a C-34 licensed contractor. Prior to installations contractor must obtain a permit from the Department of Public Works. j 18 Trees to be 24" box in size. Location and type of species � to be determined by the Department of Public Works. ; 19. Vacate portion of alley along back of property. If it is I unfeasible to vacate, then perform needed asphalt pavement , repairs on section of alley and construct two wheelchair j ramps at alley approach on Elmwood Avenue. A Public Works ' permit will be required for any asphalt or concrete work in the public right of way. 20. Construct planter curb along sidewalks on Atlantic Avenue � and also along Elmwood Avenue. 21. Construct proposed drive approaches per city standards. 22. All offsite improvements (except installation of water meter and service) must be completed by a C-8 Licensed contractor. , A permit from the Department of Public works must be secured prior to commencing any work in public right of way. disk59:reso2306 4 i,.. • � Section 3: A copy of Resolution No. 2306 the condi- tions shall be delivered to the applicant. � APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of January 1990, by � members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: a NOES: ABSENT: F ABSTAIN: l' � Donald A. Dove, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Douglas D. Barnes Acting Director Deputy City Attorney Community Development Dept. A 1 � � i disk59:reso2306 ' ; 5 i ��' F,u�NflA I��l ��.. � - DATE: January 9, 1990 CA�� N0, c �� . 32 .,, TO: PLANNING COMMISSION �FROM: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Acting Director Community Development Department �SUBJECT: Modified Conditional Use Bermit - Case No. 32 Applicant: New West Federal Savings and Loan �-� Association. �ROPOSAL• The=applicant is requesting approval of a Modified Conditional Use Permit to increase available parking to 170 spaces for the existing Stockwell Medical Building at 3680 Imperial Highway in the HMD (Hospital-Medical-Dental) zone. FACTS• 1. Source Of Authoritv Section 25-13.8 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained prior to any building or tenant improvements in association with buildings having Conditional Use Permits. 2. Prooertv Location And Size I The property is located on the south side of Imperial Highway I between Century Blvd. and Stockwell Drive. The property is � irregular in shape and is approximately 52,010 square feet. • 3. Existinq Land Use I The property is presently developed with a five story medical � office building with underground parking and additional � adjacent parking. The surrounding land uses comprise of a mixture of residential and commercial land uses which are as I follows: North - Commercial East - Residential I South - Residential West - Commercial I I 4. Land Use Description j General Plan Zonina j North - Commercial CB-1 I South - Multi-Family R-3 ! East - Multi-Family R-; West - Commercial �D I I I � , � I � CUP32:disk60 I � I i 1 j ' � I , 5. Proiect Characteristics The subject property is a five story medical office building developed pursuant to a Conditional Use Permit approved by Planning Commission Resolutions Nos. 790 and 961. The applicant wishes to amend the Conditional Use Permit to expressly provide that the buildinq may be used for general purpose offices as well as medical examination offices. The applicant is proposing to reconfigure the adjacent parking lots in order to provide 170 spaces for the above mentioned use. The reconfiguration will increase available surface parking by a minimum of 25 spaces. The applicant also proposes to provide 20 parking spaces below grade on the first level of parking. .6. �� Site Plan Review At its regular meeting of December 21, 1989 the Site Plan Review committee recommended approval to the Planning Commis- �.,= sion subject to the conditions in the attached Resolution. 7. Zoning Enforcement Histozy None of Record 8. Public Resoonse None of Record i � Analvsis And Conclusion � 1. Consistencv With General Plan � I The property is consistent with the existing zoning � classification (HMD) and the general plan designation � (Commercial). Therefore; granting Conditional Use Permit No. � 32 will not adversely affect the Lynwood General Plan. � 2. Analvsis � On September 29, 1981, Resolution No. 790 was approved for � the development of a five (5) story Condominium Medical Building with 150 parking spaces. The parking was derived i based on providing thirty (30) Medical Suites, as amended by Resolution No. 961 for the same development. , I The current usage of the office medical building represents a � change in usage and therefore a change in parking ratio i requirements. Over the years the Medical Center has leased ' space to tenants which are more labor intensive than the I approved Conditional Use Permit was designed. This has caused a parking problem whereby patrons have been forced to , park on residential streets and other commercial development � � sites. Thus, not allowing existing on site commercial ten- I ants sufficient parking for their-patrons. Further complica- I tions include the practice of the management staff (American � � Real Estate Group) of the Stockwell building. The available i parking underneath the Stockwell building has been used by � employees of the tenants in the building, thus removing I parking for patrons of the Stockwell building. Complaints have been registered by adjacent businesses who I feel that staff parking for the Imperial Stockwell Medical � Building is negatively impacting the parking surplus for � their customers and patients. CUP32:dis�60 � i I 2 � � � I � ' i RESOLUTION NO. 2309 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWpOD APPROVING MODIFIED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 32 FOR OFF-STREET PARKING IMPROVEMENTS IN THE HMD (HOSPITAL-MEDICAL-DENTAL) ZONE AT 3680 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS,the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has deter- mined that the requested modification will have no substantial adverse environmental impacts and a negative declaration has been filed; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully I considered all pertinent testimony offered in the case as � � presented at the public hearing. i The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood DOES � HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLIAWS: i Section 1. The conditions as recommended by the I Planning Commission in Resolution No. 961 is hereby modified as � follows: I 1. Subject property must be used in accordance with a ' sumitted Business Plan of Operation as approved by the � City Planning Commission. � I 2. That the redesign of the surface level parking area increase available parking by 20 spaces; and that an ; additional 25 spaces be labeled for visitor parking � below surface. � t 3. That any change in occupancy or use of the property be � approved by the Planning commission acting in its ' discretion. � 4. A permanent site plan per section 25-32.3 of the Lynwood � Municipal Code of the off-street surface and sub-surface parking areas for the subject structure shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development I Department. � � 5. Any violation of the above conditions may result in i revocation of the approved conditional use permit. � , , � � i i + � i � I ! ', 1 I disk60:reso2309 � � � ' i( I 1 i i I PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING 6. Reconstruct damaged AC pavement and PCC gutters along the alley. 7. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter and adjacent pavement. 8. Construct two (2) wheelchair ramps at Alma Street and alley. Section 2: A copy of Resolution No. 2309 the conditions shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 9th day of January 1990, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I � I I Donald A. Dove, Chairperson I I � APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ' - f I I 1 Kenrick Karefa-Johnson,Acting Douglas D. Barnes � I Director Deputy City Attorney i Community Development Dept. � I I I I I I � � � I � disk60:reso2309 i 2 I � � r I It is because of the above that City staff would not issue additional building permits for tenants improvements as requested by the management of the Stockwell building. Staff had several meetings with the American Real Estate Group and attorneys. It was decided that the applicant would provide 25 additional parking spaces above grade by re- stripping and would provide 20 parking spaces on the first level below grade. The additional 45.parking spaces would resolve the parking issue and would allow the Stockwell Building's management to lease the remaining available space. Environmental Assessment Staff has found that no substantial environmental impact will ��result from the proposed development; therefore, a negative Declaration has been filed in the Community Development Department and in the office of the City Clerk. � Recommendation: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2309. 1. Finding that Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 32 will not I have a significant effect on the environment and certify-" ing the Negative Declaration as Adequate. � 2. Approving Modified Conditional Use Permit No. 32 subject � to the stated conditions and requirements. � � Attachments• i I 1. Location Map � 2. Resolution No. 790 � 3. Resolution No. 961 � 4. Resolution No. 2309 ' 5. Site Plan I � I j i � ; i I i i I � i I cup32:disk60 I i 3 � r i I � i � ' 83060 RESOLUTION N0. 881 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CONMISSION OF T8E CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A 1SODIFICATION OF . CONDITIONS WITS RESPECT TO RESOLUTION N0. 790, ALLOW- ING THE DEVELOPMENT OF A FIVE (S) STORY.CONDOMINIUI! NEDICAL BUILDING ON LOTS l� 2� 3� AND 4 OF TRACT N0. 14391� CITY OF LYNWOOD. � ` WHEREAS, the Plaaniag Commission of the City of Lyawood� Deld a pub]ic heariag coacerning the appllcatioa for a modificatioa oi conditions respect to aub,�ect site; � wHEREAS, the Plaaning Commisaion has care2ully conaidered all partineat testimoay oifered in the caae at tha publiC DearlaQ; NHEREAS, the Director oi Community Developmeat has deter- , miaed that the requeated modiiication will have ao aubstaatial edverae eavironmental impacts� aad a Negative Delcaratioa has beea filed. The Plaaaiag Commisaioa oi the City oi Lyawood DOES I HEREBY RESOLVE ae iollows: , Section 1, The Conditions as recommeaied by,the P1saalaQ , I Commisaion in Reso ut on No. 780 is hereby modified as Sollowa: � "33. Sub�ect pro�ect may be divided lnto thirty (30) •� suites, and may be divided aot to exceed Zorty (40) � sultes provlded: , � � (a) That adequate parkiag ia available Sor any � suites in excesa oi thirty (30), in accordance ' with the Zoaing Ordinanca oi tha City oi Lyn- � wood; � (b) that the location deaign and amount oi any ' � additional parkiag shall be approved by the . Planning Commisaioa� actiag in its diacretlon. � "34. A permaneat site plan per Section 25-32.3 oi tha ' � i Lyn�ood buaicipal Code oi the oit-atreet aur2ace 'parking areas ior the sub�ect atr�}cture aball be � aubmitied to aad aPProved by the Plaaniag Depart- I "35. Appiicant shaU provide a traffic study in accordance with j the requirementa of the City,Engineer, in the event addittonal parking is requtred for the atructure." +� - - I • 3ectioa 2. TLe Planniag Commiasioa has considered all evidence and reporia pertainiag to tbia matter and herebq edopta and � iacorporates herein as thougki set torth ia iull ead Lbe 31nd1aQs aad � determinationa oi Resolution No, ?90. � __ -. I t - __ � � _ � . I , i , .. � �: � i • .• ,• 6PPROVED AND ADOPTED oa the llth day oi October, 1963, by tbe Planaiag Commiasioners voting ea Sollows; AYE3: Commissioners Hodge, Kanka, Dove, Raymond. NOES• pryor and Robbins • None ABSENT: None ��-C'LS � ona ove, sirmaa� APPR VED AS T CONTENT: ��CGtli� Sa�ol�z . �i��d � � � I �an ra , ea , ommun ty I Development Director � APPROVED AS TO FORM: ' � ��--� �2!�--�� • . . urt eager, esistaat' ity Attorney `� • � I I • � � I i - I ; r I i � i I I r , � � I i , � - i I � . � , i � � .. ... _. �.�............�... �. �. �v.--_ ^..ry�c-.r-��..-� . . . . . . .. . •�.:. � !._..... ... � . .... �.. _ .. _ � � .� � � �� ' .. . . . . . •. . . � . � .. ..^"'•_ r . .. . .. . - . . .. .... . '; i Y � � - , � _ , C � • , . , - � � � - 81075 � CUP RESOLUTION N0.790 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLAND7ING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWppD , �1ppROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PE1iMZT q+p ,q�,LOW THE DEVELOPA1Eb7T OF A FI� (5) STORY CONDOMINIUM MEDI�, gUILDING ON LOTS 1,2,3, AND 4 OF TRACT NO. 14391, CITY OF LYNWppD WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, has giving notice thereof as required by law, held and public hearin , after Permit to develooncerning(S;es{oplication for a ConditionaldUse p a five on �e property described above;� condominium medical building WHERF,AS, the Planning Comm,ission has carefull all pertinent testimony offered in the case public hearing; as Y considered I presented at the WHEREAS the sub I ' ject property is in the CB_1 zone; substantialHadv�� the Planning Director has determined that ho proposed erse environmental impacts would result I project, and has filed a Negative Declaration;from the I the PlannedHEREAg, the plans submitted meet the re I Ordinance ofBIISiness Zone (CB-1) aS set forth qulr � e nts for the City of Lynwood; in the Zoning � NOW, THEREFORE I Commission finds and concludesT RESOLVED that I • the Planning I 1 • That the granting of said per�t will not adversely affect the Comprehensive General Plan, as the . � - subject property is designated on said Plan for "COmmercial" land � us e; , i 2 • That the proposed location op I is in accord with the ob the conditional use ' Ordinance of the Cit jectives I the CB-1 zone Y Lynwood �f the 2oning I the retail � 1n that the proposedd the purpose of a use core area of the businessuse will provide � which is intensive in nature; district � with � 3 • That the proposed location of the conditional use I and the conditions under which it would I or maintained will not be detrimental ' health be operated � or i mprovements in theevicinitin'�urious�tohe public � Declaration has y as a Ne PrO perties been filed; ffative � 4 • That the proposed conditional � � each of the applicable use will j Ordinance, as stated in P r ovisions op °Omply with _ the conditionshe 2oning `BE IT FURTHER listed below. I the City �f LYnwood RESOLVED, that the Permit tc. develop,a fPVe the applic CO�ission op the abovr. address (5 � story condomini a Conditional Use , subject to the followin � medical building at I 9 c onditions ; j � , ; I I � I � i i , � ' 1 I I � � ' , I �, ; i � � ( � RESOLUTION NO. 2309 � ' A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING � COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ; LYNWOOD APPROVING MODIFIED i CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 32 FOR � OFF-STREET PARRING IMPROVEMENTS IN i THE HMD (HOSPITAL-MEDICAL-DENTAL) j ZONE AT 3680 IMPERIAL HZGHWAY, ! LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. y WHEREAS,the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has deter- mined that the requested modification will have no substantial adverse environmental impacts and a negative declaration has been filed; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered all pertinent testimony offered in the case as presented at the public hearing. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLIAWS: Section 1. The conditions as recommended by the Planning Commission in Resolution No. 961 is hereby modified as follows: 1. Subject property must be used in accordance with a sumitted Business Plan of Operation as approved by the City Planning Commission. 2. That the redesign of the surface level parking area increase available parking by 20 spaces; and that an additional 25 spaces be labeled for visitor parking � below surface. , 3. That any change in occupancy or use of the property be � approved by the Planning commission acting in its I discretion. � � 4. A permanent site plan per section 25-32.3 of the Lynwood i Municipal Code of the off-street surface and sub-surface parking areas for the subject structure shall be � submitted to and approved by the Community Development � Department. � i 5. Any violation of the above conditions may result in � ; revocation of the approved conditional use permit. � , � I `, I ; I I disk60:reso2309 I I I ; � j 1 `, � I i i;: ,• , �'' , � PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING �:-: I" 6. Reconstruct damaged AC pavement and PCC gutters along the alley. j _i I - 7. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter and ', adjacent pavement. � 8. Construct two (2) wheelchair ramps at Alma Street and alley. I. Section 2: A copy of Resolution No. 2309 the conditions shall be delivered to the applicant. r APPROVED and ADOPTED this 9th day of January 1990, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Donald A. Dove, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kenrick Karefa Douglas D. Barnes Director Deputy City Attorney ' Community Development Dept. ' 1 ! I � � � ; I ! i I i � disk60:reso2309 , i ' i ; 2 � i ; � � �' I � i 1 ' i I � AGENbA l�fi�M N0. DATE: January 9, 1990 I�HJC IY�. � U�� TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Acting Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 33 Applicant: Guido Sacerio �ROPOSAL• The�applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop a two-story Duplex at 12506 Waldorf Avenue, in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. FACTS• 1. Source Of Authoritv Section 25-42 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to build or relocate dwelling units in the R-2 zone. 2. Propertv Location And Size The property is located on the East side of Waldorf Avenue between Carlin Avenue and Olanda Street. The property is rectangular in shape and is approximately 9,839 square feet , (50' x 196.78'). ! i 3. Existing Land Use i The property is presently developed with a single family + house. The surrounding land uses comprise of a mixture of residential land uses which are as follows: i ' North - Residential East - Residential � South - Residential West - Multi-Family Residential � 4. Land Use Description � General Plan Zonina ' North - Townhouse & Cluster Housing R-2 South - Townhouse & Cluster Housing R-2 ' East - Townhouse & Cluster Housing R-2 i West - Townhouse & Cluster Housing R-2 � 5. Project Characteristics � The applicant proposes to build two three-bedroom units. � Each unit will be provided with a two-car garage. For each � of the three-bedroom units, the living room, dining area, kitchen, and bath will be located on the first floor while three-bedrooms and one full bath will be provided on the � second floor. Approximately thirty (30�) percent of the � land is designated for landscaping. I � disk59:cup33 , 1 � � 6. Site Plan Review At its regular meeting of December 21, 1989 the Site Plan Review Committee recommended approval to the Planning Commission subject to the conditione in the attached Reso- lution. 7. Zoninq Enforcement Historv None of Record S. Public Resvonse Letter from School District ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSZON l. � Consistencv With General Plan The property is consistent with the existing zoning classification (R-2) and the General Plan designation .-.— (Townhouse & Cluster Housing). Therefore, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 33 will not adversely affect the Lynwood General Plan. 2. Site Suitabilitv The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development relative to density, bulk of the structures, parking, walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. The property is adequately served with the required public utilities and offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility. 3. Compatibilitv � The proposed development is surrounded by moderate density � residential developments. Therefore, the project will be � compatible with developments in the area. i 4. Compliance With Development Standards t The proposal meets all of the development standards � required by the Zoning Ordinance with respect to parking; � front, side, and rear-yard setbacks,; distance between � structures; lot coverage; open space and landscaping; � building height; unit size and density. I 5. Conditions Of Aooroval I The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions i recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, would , neither have a negative effect nor would it interfere with ! the values of the surrounding properties or endanger the ' public health, safety or welfare. I I 6. Benefits To Communitv I The proposed development will aid to aesthetically upgrade the neighborhood and act as a catalyst in fostering other ' quality developments. Furthermore, it will add favorable to the City's housing stock and provide additional afford- ably-priced housing in furtherance of the policies of the � Housing Element of the General Plan. disk59cup33 ! I 2 ' i I 7. Environmental Assessment The Community Development Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15061 b(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act of 1989 as amended. RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2310: 1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3). :2.'� Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 33, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. Attachments• 1. Location Map 2. Letter from School District 3. Resolution No. 2310 4. Plot Plan i i I i j � i I � i i 1 � i I � disk59:CUp33 ; I � 3 � I � 1 - RESOLUTZON NO. 2310 I A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 33 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2), TWO-STORY DUPLEX AT 12505 WALDORF DRIVE AVENUE� IN THE R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, 90262 WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 b(3), as amended; and WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for develop- ment in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and deter- mines as follows: A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Official Zoning Ordinance. � S. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, I will not have a negative effect on the values of � surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger I the public, health, safety, or welfare. � � C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current I zoning regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the Site Plan review Committee. D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not � adversely affect the General Plan. � E. The proposed development will add favorably to the � housing stock and will provide additional affordable � priced housing in concert with the policies of the ' I Housing Element of the General Plan. I F. The proposed development will aid in aesthetically j upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in fos- tering other quality developments. , i Section 2. The.Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, � based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 30, provided the fol- lowing conditions are observed and complied with at all times. ' I , � � i i . disk60:reso2310 ' I �1 1 � ,� ! � , i I � I i � i I . I COMMUNITY DEVEIAPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building code and the Fire code. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, for review of said Conditional Use Permit. 3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. 4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a - Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, under- " stands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance of any building permits. — PLANNING DZVISION CONDITIONS 5. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving the proposed development. 6. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one hundred and twenty (120) days after the use permitted has � been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised. 7. Construction shall commence within (6) months from date � of issuance of building permits. � 8. The site shall be developed to a maximum of two (2) dwelling units. 9. Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25$) percent of the lot area. I 1 10. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance � with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the i Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. � The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs com- � bined with ground cover as follows: One (1) five (5) gallon � shrub for each 100 square feet of landscaped area; and two i (2) fifteen gallon trees for each 500 square feet of land- I scaped areas. 11. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped , and shall consist predominately of plant materials except for necessary walks, drives and fences. � 12. A minimum of six (6) parking spaces shall be provided. There � shall be six (6) enclosed parking spaces, one covered and � one uncovered parking space. i I 13. A six (6') foot high block all shall be installed along the � perimeter of the property, except within the twenty (20') foot front yard setback. In this frontage, if built, the , '�, wall shall not exceed a height of four (4') feet measured � from top of curb. � i 14. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet. disk60:reso2310 � � � I , I I � i 2 � i I � � I I i • � 15. Final building elevations, including materials of construc- tion, shall be submitted to and approved by the Building Official and the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. 16. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer shall pay $1.53 per square foot for residential buildings to the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government Code Section 53080. 17. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved. 18. Accoustical construction materials shall be used throughout the units to mitigate freeway noise to the standards and = satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. 19. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective material including shingles, woodshake, asphalt composite, crushed � rock and other similar roofing material that is not reflec- tive, glossy, or polished and/or roll form type metal roof- ing. 20. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar material other than the reflective glossy, polished and/or rolled-formed type metal siding. 21. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the I street dedications. 22. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the � exterior elevation of the building must be approved by the � Director o£ Community Development or his/her designee. � 23. Trash areas shall be enclosed by five (5') foot high decora- � tive masonry walls with gates. i 24. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in � a consistent manner, including the incorporation within the I side and rear building elevations of same or all of the ' design elements used for the primary (front) facades. � 25. That the applicant submit elevation drawings to the Planning ' Division showing the exterior building design; including the � specification of colors, and materials. � 26. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally " compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent building. in addition, no security fences, grills, etc. � shall be installed without the prior written approval of the , Director of Community Development. i 27. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment, � swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical i devices shall be located within the rear yard or street side yard of corner lot. Such equipment shall be screened from � surrounding properties and streets and so operated that they i do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring � residents, in accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance ' 28. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in sanitary condition pending construction and shall be main- tained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure to comply may result in revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. ; disk60:reso2310 � , , 3 � i � � � t � i I � 29. Zf applicable, the facade of the existing structure shall be j improved to the satisfaction of etaff with an additional , material to window level which relates to the facade of the � new construction. Staff's determination is reviewable if necessary by the Planning Commission. � PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION 30. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected separately. Construct laterals as necessary. 31.. Underground all utilities. 32. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all off-site improvements. 3'� All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the i Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any work. i FIRE DEPARTMENT I I . � I 34. If security bars are placed on bedroom windows, at least one 'I window for each bedroom shall have quick release mechanisms that does not require a key or any special knowledge. � U.B.C. Sec. 1204. � i 35. Provide smoke detectors, (U.L. and State Fire Marshal ap- � prove type.) � i I Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered I to the applicant. I APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of January, 1990, by � members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: ; � AYES: , . � NOES: ABSENT: i ABSTAIN: Donald Dove, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ' I Vicente L. Mas, Director poug1as D. Barnes ! Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney � disk60:reso2310 i I 4 ' � DATE: January 9, 1990 A�ENDA IYEM N� . � -' '�� TO: PLANNING COMMISSION CASE N0 C U 3 FROM: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Acting Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 34 Applicant: Alfred Brown PROPOSAL• The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop a two-story dwelling unit at 4160 Carlin Avenue in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone. FACTS• 1 1. Source of Authoritv ' Section 25-42 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained for any residen- tial development in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone. 2. Prooertv Location And Size: The site is located on the south side of Carlin Avenue between Thorson and Harris Avenues.. (Refer to the attached Location Map). The site consists of a rectangular lot of approximately 8,400 square feet (60'x 140'). 3. Existina Land Use: The site is presently occupied by a single-family dwelling unit. The surrounding land uses are as follows: North - Residential Multi-Family South - Residential Multi-Family East - Residential Multi-Family West - Residential Multi-Family 4. Land Use Desiqnation: The General Plan designation for the subject property is Multi-Family, while the zoning description is R-3. The surrounding land use designations are as follows: General Plan � Zoning North - Town House North - R-2 � and Cluster Housing � I South - Multi-Family South - R-3 East - Multi-Family East - R-3 West - Multi-Family West - R-3 disk59:cup34 � � 1 � I � � � I , 6. Proiect Characteristics: The applicant proposes to build a new 2-car garage attached to the existing unit and to construct a two-story unit in the rear with an attached 2-car garage. Approximately twenty-nine (29�) percent is designated for landscaping. 7. Site Plan Review: On December 21, 1989, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and recommended approval to the Planning Commission subject to the conditions in the _ attached Resolution. 8. Zoning Enforcement Historv: None of record. 9. Public Response: Letter from School District ISSUES AND ANALYSIS 1. Consistencv with General Plan The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning classification (R-3) and the General Plan designation (Multi-Family Housing). Therefore, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 34, will not adversely affect the General Plan. 2. Site Suitabilitv The subject property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development relative to the proposed density; bulk of the structures; parking; wall fences; driveways, and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, the subject property is adequately served with the required public utilities and offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility. 3. Comoliance with Development Standards The proposed development meets all the development standards required by the Zoning Ordinance reqarding off-street parking; front, and rear yard setbacks; lot coverage, height, unit size; and density. 4. Compatibilitv The proposed project will be located in a neighborhood that is substantially transitioned from single-family to multi- family residences. Other properties in the vicinity are developed with multiple units. The proposed project is consistent with the R-3 zoning in the area and with the (Multi-Family Residential) General Plan designation. disk59:cup34 � i 1 2 � I I I � � � 5. Conditions of Aoproval The improvements proposed, subject to the conditions recom mended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. 6. �enefits to Communitv The proposed development will aid to aesthetically upgrade the neighborhood and will act as a catalyst to foster other quality developments. Moreover, the development will add favorably to the City's housing stock in furtherance of the _ policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. 7. Environmental Assessment — The Community Development Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15061 b(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act of 1989 as amended. RECOMMENDATION• Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2311: 1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3). 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 34 subject to the stated conditions and requirements. ATTACHMENTS• 1. Location Map 2. Letter from School District 3. Resolution No. 2311 4. Site Plan � i � , � disk59:cup34 � , i I i ; I 3 , LOCATION iVIAP `� a �- s —�?e, ... �r�iy_ -� �' re. ,o � � � � � , AVENUE o ,� ^ . ALVADA a ST. 0/J.1s �"; ' � f) q ra0 ' . w 2 R A � r �--��- ��r� � i A:, :, .,< o�- . s �.... � � � ''., hG� •—��°_ f �fi, � s s.ii � ' � y� . �Ur 4 . � � i I !O � . . � y • � � n.n 1 ... I .. � o _— ` � , ''�� .� �� r • �..—.—� Q � � . �. I . � y" • e = 8T«�'� I �TIJ LO'f 2 ' .� � t`�.91 N .j ' � t - ' . . .- h 3 �} ° )/ � i 1 i � 1 �I - I ' , /IY I � 4 \ ,� .c er � n GAR-� 1 1� $ � s x .4� �i. $ �` Z' �i � 'I`rs°'R" I !S Z I�JS �ytf t° e.r ?;.r� S ! + n� n �ris ssiz .ord � � ¢7 �o .Y8(�IL.L��' , 7 •' C; '` O i�OR'T�ON � `: � ° 3 �_ / 1 3 `! 7 J [� 7� LOT� 7 � ^ ...� n.a / S/ t ' I � eo 8u ��ta n A • .. � � 17RkCTl .. ., i i � . . 'd y"'� J '� y I I i�s.>� � m� �� • ... } ft u st 9 � � .� : w , W � ]✓ 9B.D9 .. •�• , n•n ♦ 11.1 ��i.0 . Q • � .x�w {$ S I` j 2 1 � r T .�' Q .,nu� � S v.�s .� Z f � I 71 O /9 '/! ^ O� 'S nats S O � 6 �i�vi . s,�, . „ o ; � ' ..,. A � •. � !SD' i 9 A)! ° i ..�� N . . � , . 'dLNI ' v 9' x � 6 a... .. \� 6 7 � p, � ,� , AVENUE � _ ""' F :� „V • SO 3c m �` , � F— � ..,, .� ..� B �a.�v� . . e '� e P ' ' ��,o, �� e? sE7o `ii� F is ` 8 9 ,,.•. , � �I.�`F �v � .. ,,,.e /O,em�' 50 KT� • . Se le� SN - y . an�,i .. 'Q 9 " 'm 9 . �. . l 1 „• .asw , � �.n. . . ' i . . . � �� . H� . . .; � . ': �Q \�l�S � b •• . . �iTV , �.j i(1 �.�. . 1 .. ' . ..:i:- Y �. �; !'� ..:� � 4 t G//on6 �'>7� / -'' /J.<, j.�. .�'sT :'�J'..a.!:.,!e4 �' v.L�. .�''c _ _:dx0�.'.. �. f�P _ ��'! 3 ..... �� ..JV:.:. _...r:f �r: � U � � �� ` RESOLUTION NO. 2311 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVZNG CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 34 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AT 41G0 CARLIN AVENUE, IN THE R-3 (MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD CALIFORNIA, 90262. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 b(3), as amended; and WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for development in the R-3 (MUlti-Family Residential) zone. SECTION 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and deter- , mines as follows: A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Official Zoning Ordinance. B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public, health, safety or welfare. C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current zoning regulations and site plan submitted-and approved by the Site Plan Review Committee. D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. E. The proposed development will add favorably to the housing stock and will provide additional affordable priced housing in concert with the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. F. The proposed development will aid in aesthetically up- grading the area and will act as a catalyst in fostering other quality developments. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 34, provided the fol- lowing conditions are observed and complied with at all times. disk59:reso2311 � 1 i ; I ! i i � � I , COMMUNITY DEVEIAPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDZTIONS 1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. 2. The applicant or his representative, shall sign a Statement of Acceptance within fifteen (15) days from the date of approval of this Resolution by the Planning Commission. Signing this statement implies that applicant or his repre- sentative has read, understands and agrees to the conditions of this Resolution. 3. All City of Lynwood Municipal Code and Zoning Ordina'nce requirements shall be met. � � PLANNING DIVISION 4� The total development will consist of one (1) two-story residential unit and a second story and garage addition to existing dwelling, along with parking and other amenities. 5. A minimum of two (2) two-car garages shall be provided. 6. A minimum of twenty-five percent (25$) of the lot shall be landscaped and provided with an automatic irrigation system. 7. Street numbers for the new building unit numbers shall be plainly visible and shall be a minimum of four inches (4") in height and shall be contrasting in color to the background. 8. All construction shall be performed by a licensed contractor. 9. A landscape plan shall be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. No principal building on the site shall exceed a height of thirty-five (35') feet. 11. Construction shall commence within six (6) months from date of issuance of building permits. 12. The Conditional Use Permit shall become null and void if compliance under the foregoing conditions does not commence within one-hundred (120) days from the date on which the Conditional Use Permit was granted. 13. A chain link wall six feet (6') in height shall be constructed along the perimeter of the property, except � within the twenty foot (20') front yard setback, which shall � not exceed four feet (4') in height. Construction of a fence in the front yard set-back is optional (not required). i 14. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in a � sanitary condition pending construction, and shall be I maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. � Failure to comply may result in revocation of the � � Conditional Use Permit. � 15. Final building elevations, including materials of construc- � tion, shall be submitted to and approved by the Building � Official prior to issuance of any building permits. i disk59:reso2312 � � I i 2 � i � I •• ' 16. Before any building permits may be issued, the applicant/developer shall pay $1.53 per square foot for residential buildings to the Lynwood Unified School Dis- trict, pursuant to Government Code Section 53080. PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING CONDITIONS 17. Provide documentation that lots composing the property were legally separated to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. After reviewing the documents, the Department of Public Works may require the submission and recordation of a parcel map or lot merger. 18.; Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered Civil Engineer. Grading plan will be checked by Public Works Department. No building permits will be issued prior to the approval of grading plan by City Engineer. �19. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter and adjacent pavement along Carlin Avenue. . 20. Reconstruct damaged and substandard drive approach(es), per City standards. 21. Construct two(2) wheelchair ramps at Southeast & Southwest corners of Carlin Avenue and Harris Avenue. 22. No access through the rear alley is allowed. Alley will be vacated in the future. 23. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected separately. Construct laterals as necessary. 24. Install two(2) 24" box street trees in accordance with City of Lynwood standards along Carlin Avenue. Species location to be determined by the Department of Public Works. A permit to install the trees is required by the Engineering Division. Exact locations of the tree(s) will be determined at the time the permit is issued. 25. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass. 26. Provide and install one (1) marblelite street pole with light fixture, underground services and conduits along Carlin Avenue. � 27. Underground all utilities. 28. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all- off-site improvements. 29. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any work. i � disk59:reso2311 � I I 3 i � �; i i , I I ,. . FIRE DEPARTMENT 30. If security bars are placed on bedroom windows, at least one window for each bedroom shall have quick release mechanisms that does not require a key or any special knowledge. � U.B.C. Sec. 1204 31. Provide smoke detectors, (U.L. and State Fire Marshal ap- prove type.) Section 3. A copy of Resolution No. 2311 shall be delivered to the applicant. - ' APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of January, 1990, by mem- bers of Planning Commission voting as follows: -- AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: disk59:reso2311 Donald Dove, Chairman APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson,Acting Douglas D. Barnes Director Community Development Deputy City Attorney Dept. I I disk59:reso231 I I I � i i ! 4 I I , I � I � � f . q( � ' �. � r Y-' �� RG�NDA 1�`�M �ld. � - _, �` CASE N0. z o A�__ Y DATE : JANUAR7C - 9, 19 9 0 TO: ' PLANNING COMMISSION „ FROM:�� Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Acting Director �_ Community Development Department SUBJECT: Multi le - Tenant Retail Ordinance Amendment Case No. ZOA 6 Reaulatinq Area of Vendor Soace Citv-Wide. Proposal• The Staff is proposing to amend.Chapter 25, the official zoning code with respect to regulating multiple-tenant retail centers; city wide more specifically, area of vendor space. Background• In recent months, proposals for multiple-tenant retail uses have come forth for city review and approval. In reviewing such , proposals, it was noted that current mulitple-tenant retail development standard regarding area of vendor space are deficient with respect to tenant area size. Furthermore, the standard allows for to many vendor spaces.per each proposed center. � Analvsis And Conclusion: ' The current ordinance, (Ordinance No. 1292), requires a Conditional Use Permit for all Multiple Tenant Retail Centers in - C-2, C-2A, C-3 and M zones. . ' The ordinance, also, provides for specific development standards among which is_the standard regulating "area of vendor space" (Section 25-35.3 (10) calling for a minimum floor area of each vendor space to be 200 square feet in size). . The application of the current standard regulating area of vendor space ( i.e. a minimum floor area of each vendor space at 200 sq. ft. in size), against current proposals reveal that such space firstly would a. produce an inadequate yendor.space for vendor use b. produce inadequate area for product display and c. produce inadequate space for,required minimum storage in vendor area. Secondly, the vendor area size under current standards , will only allow for such products as socks, ties, and tie shirts, rather then quality products. Lastly, the standard allows for too many vendor spaces in a specific center to insure success within the center. Staff has developed an ordinance amendment correcting the ' problem. The proposed amendment will increase the minimum vendor area size from 200 sq. ft. to 400 sq. ft. in order to insure adequate vendor space for desirable vendor use, adequate area to display quality products, and provide for a reasonable number of vendors within multiple tenant retail centers. i _ . . disk6l:caseZ06A • . , I � , ,; . � Environmental Assessment: Staff has found that no substantial environmental impact will result from this amendment to the zoning code; and, therefore the amendment is categorically exempt and the exemption is on file in the Community Development Department and the Office of the City Clerk. Recommendation ' Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the ' Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2312 - A. The project is exempt from the provisions of State CEQA - � Guideline, as amended by Section 15061 b(3). ` B. Recommend that the City Council approve the findings in ` Resolution No. 2312 waive the readinq and introduce the '—" proposed ordinance. Attachments• 1. Resolution No. 2312 2. Proposed Ordinance i , � ' 1 w _ � , i � I disk6l:caseZOA6 � i i � , I I � � 2 � {t . RESOLUTION NO. 2312 ' A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF � THE CITY OF LYNWOOD RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 25-11.3 (10), THE OFFICIAL ZONING CODE, OF THE " LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO REGULATING AREA OF VENDOR SPACE CITY WIDE. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, did, pursuant to law, conduct a public hearing on a proposed � amendment to the Lynwood Municipal Code with respect to the above subject; and , WHEREAS, the Planninq Commission of the City of Lynwood considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public - hearing; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that no substantial environmental impact will result from the proposed amendment; and therefore, the amendment is categorically exempt arid is on file in the Community Development Department and the office of the City Clerk. Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The proposed amendment will be consistent with the objectives and the development policies of the City of Lynwood. B. The proposed amendment will not unreasonably constrain the use of property by landowners and developers. . C. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the General Plan. I �� Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, � based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, j ' hereby recommends City Council adoption of the proposed amend- � ' ment: j I APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of January, 1990, by � members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: I i ' � � j i ! � : I � � i I j disk6l:reso2312 � � � 1 i � � � . � , . ,. , AYESa NOES: , ABSENT: ABSTAIN: •� Donald Dove, Chairman APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS,TO FORM: � ` Kenrick Karefa-Johnson,.Acting Douglas Barnes Community Development Director General Counsel Dept. I • �'� i i , � . I � l � i ' � � i ! . ! . � I � t � ... -.. - - .. - � . I disk6l:reso2312 � . � � �i ' 2 ; ' j � j I , , . . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CZTY OF LYNWOOD AMENDING CHAPTER 25, THE OFFICIAL ZONING ORDINANCE, OF THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO REGULATING THE AREA OF VENDOR SPACE IN MULTIPLE TENANT RETAIL CENTERS CITY WIDE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 25, Section 25-35.3 (10) area of vendor space shall be amended. 2�=35.3 Develooment Standards. Amended to read as follows: 25-35.3 (10) area of vendor space. The minimum floor area of each vendor space shall be 400 square feet. Section 2. SEVERABILZTY. If any section, subsection subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion'of this ordinance, or the application thereof to any person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to other persons or places. The City Council hereby declares that it would have - adopted this ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions, or the application thereof to any person or place, be declared invalid or unconstitutional. - First read at regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the day of , 1990, and finally adopted and ordered published at a meeting of said Council held on the ` day of , 1990, by the following vote: . � disk6l:ordi � � �� . 1 I � .. I AYES: NOES: • ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Robert Henning, Mayor ' ATTEST: Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk . APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Acting Henry S. Barbosa Community Development Department General Counsel Dept. - � �� G � � � � � j � � , disk6l:ordi i � I _ i ,�. 2 I I . \ .. M . . . .. . . �� r�� . . . . .. p ' � MINUTES OF'A REGUI�AR MEETING ' PLANNING COMMZSSION . CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, JANUARY 9, 1990 . OPENING CEREMONIES A. The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of . Lynwood was called to order by Chairperson Dove on the above captioned date at 7:30 p.m.,.in the Council Chambers of Lynwood City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California •90262. B._ Pledge Of Allecriance Commissioner Cole-Dennis led the Pledge of Allegiance. ' C. Ro11.Ca11 of<Commissioners , Chairperson Dove requested the roll call, and'Mr. Fenderson complied. Present: >Commissioner Lena'Cole-Dennis � Commissioner ponald A. Dove Commissioner Carlton McMiller � CommissioneY Jamal Muhsin Commissioner Roy Pryor Commissioner David J. Willis Also � Present: ;Douglas Barnes, City Attorney - Aubrey Fenderson, Planning Manager Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Interim Community . Development Director = Arthur Barfield, Planning Associate „ Emilio M. Murga, Assistant City Engineer , Joy Valentihe, Minutes Clerk Mr. Fenderson informed the Commissioners that Commissioner ` Haynes called sta£f ,and requested.an excused absence because he has the flu. . MOTION by Commissioner Willis, seconded by Commissioner -. McMiller, to grant an excused absence to Commissioner Haynes. - ` MOTION carried unanimbusly. , Approximately six people were in the audience. E. Certification of Agenda Posting � Mr. Fenderson stated the agenda was posted per the Brown Act. F. ApTaroval of Minutes I � minutesdisk7:min10 � IY i ' 1 , �� , . . � . , i i.. ' '' , . . ,. . '�,�, . . . . .. MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner , Willis, to accept the October 9, 1989, minutes and the December 10, 1989, minutes as submitted. , MOTION carried by'the following vote: AYESr Commissioner pove, Cole-Dennis, McMiller, Muhsin, Pryor, Willis NOES: None • ,' ABSENT: Commissioner Haynes , ABSTAIN: None A . CONTINUED.PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 32 (CUP 31) 3100 Imperial Highway (Donald Chae) Applicant requests approval to develop'a retail shopping mall ' in the CB-1 (Controlled Susiness) zone. Mr: Karefa-Johnson stated the City's concern is that this enterprise not be a"swap meet" type of business, but more -like a conventional mall, and noted that there are 73 listed ' conditions to ensure this. He stated there is also concern , about.security, both on and offsite. He further stated that each vendor will be, required to have receipts, sales records, etc., to prove ownership of inerchandise for.sale. Colors will be uniform throughout the building and permanently mounted fixtures, not folding chairs or lawn ° furniture, will be required:. The aisles will be 8' in width , and this space must be kept clean and clear of inerchandise. , There will be separate restrooms on the first and second . floors open to the public without charge. All premises must be open to reasonable inspection by City staff at all times and a copy of their lease agreement must be available at all times. The video arcade noted on the first floor plans was ' deleted by the Sheriff's Department and none will be allowed • on the second floor.'- The child book store and adjoining business wilY be combined into vendor area; the pizza shop and coffee shop wi11 be combined into one; and, the car ' stereo and pharmacy will'also be combined into one. Chairperson Dove asked if there will be uniform colors throughout or changed to accommodate chain stores that may ° lease.space. Mr: Rarefa-Johnson replied that uniform colors will prevail o- throughout the mall. Mr. Fenderson stated that some changes were made to the amendments and one condition, Condition iio. 73, requiring that Grape Street be vacated, was deleted. Condition No. 31 .� , was renumbered to be Condition No. 31.2. Under 31.2, "h." has been renumbered to be Condition l�o. 32. -. . Mr. Karefa-Je�hnson commented that Mr. Barnes was working on another condition which-will be added later in the meeting. Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing. , � , , , minutesdisk7:min10 . � j � � � � ' J . I t ' Donald Chae, 1001 S. Aill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90015 expressed his appreciation of the City's consideration, and thanked all the City departments. However, he expressed his � ooncern about a couple of the conditions imposed by staff. Mr. Karefa-Johnson stated.the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency ' has given their support for the concept, but it is the Planning Commission which most decide on approval or denial, and the decision of the Planing Commission,can be appealed to , the City Council. , Chairperson Dove expressed his approval of available commercial activity in the old Montgomery Wards building, and stated the area should be utilized. Commissioner Pryor stated his approval of the project and his ` opinion that it will be an asset to the City. � Mr. Karefa-Johnson asked Mr. Chae what concerns he had about the conditions, and Mr. Ray Sun Low, 3801 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles 90010, rose to assist Mr. Chae. - Mr..Chae and Mr. Low objected to 'the condition requiring solid partitions fully closed between different vendors. If , all sections are closed off, this will interfere, with the � present spr'inkler system. Also, it will not be visually , pleasing - and wi11 make the individual shops look like very , confined spaces, somewhat like a shoe box environment. Open spaces is desired as much as possible. . Chairperson Dove stafed the solid partitions would iinpart more security between vendors. Mrs. Chae and Low stated their intentions to install an alarm ' system and hire armed guards. ° , Chairperson Dove inquired if there will be 24 hour security. Mr. Chae stated there will be motion detectors and two to ' four guar'ds patrolling the outside areas. Chairperson Dove stated his preference for full floor-to- ' ceiling partitions for the added security, so vendors can't steal from each other. Mr. Chae stated that the vendors will not be permitted to stay on,the premises after business hours, the alarm system - will be turned on and they will have to leave. Mr. Karefa-Johnson asked how high the applicants would like the partitions to be and Mr. Chae replied, "Eight to ten feet." Commissioner Pryor"asked Mr. Chae if he felt that that concept would be approved by the Fire Department and Mr. Chae - ' replied that the Fire. Department prefers the lower petitions '" because the sprinkler system will be better utilized. � V Commissioner McMiller commented that if the lower partitions were adopted, and the sprinkler system proves inadequate, . smoke will rise and all areas will be accesaible to the smoke. he stated that it would be better if the smoke could be locked i�n the-area-in-which._it.originated. However, he will accept the Iower partitions if they are approved by the . Fire Department. He further stated that the present fire , system won't be adequate to accommodate cooking/eating areas , ,� ----because the building wasn't originaIly designed for food � areas. - minutesdisk7:min10 � - 3 L ' . Mr. Chae replied that there are special conditions for the food facilities. Commissioner Pryor discussed th�se areas that can be enlarged " and those that cannot be changed. He asked if the attic spaces.have sprinklers, and, it was generally agreed that .` there are probably no sprinklers in the attic. � Commissioner McPliller asked about bathrooms and Mr. Chae Yeplied that there will be eight water closets for men.and ten for the women, as required by the Health Department. Mr.. Chae stated that they will nse the standard water closets ' plus those required for the physically handicapped. Commissioner Willis asked if there will be urinals in the " mens' rooms,Mr. Chae replied _that there will be seven uri- nals and four lavatories. ` Commissioner McMiller asked if the restaurants will have separate restrooms and Mr. Chae replied in the affirmative. � Chairperson Dove asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak for or against the proposal, there being no one, he closed the Public Hearing. Commissioner Pryor asked why automobile parts can't be sold ' in the mall and Mr. Rarefa-Johnson replied that there is an ordinance to that effect in the Lynwood City Code. Mr. Barnes suggested the addition of another condition, as ' mentioned by Mr. Karefa-Johnson before the Public Hearing, to � be numbered Condition.No. 5 and read as follows: "Operator • � uses shall be in accordance with map on file in Community . Development except as approved by the Director of Community ' , Development.° Commissioner McMiller asked which way the doors would go when opened and Mr. Karefa-Johnson_replied that they will open in. ` Mr. Chae asked if Community Development will have any new conditions and Mr. Karefa-Johnson replied he wasn't sure, it's too soon to te1T. - MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner Willis, to approve Resolution No.2307, "A RESOLUTION OF THE � PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMZT NO. 31 FOR THE OPERATION OF A MULTI- TENANT RETAIL SHOPPING MALL AT 3100 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY IN THE CB-1 {CONTROLLED BUSINESS) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, 90262," as amended by Condition No. 5, "Operator uses sha11 be in accordance with map on file `in Community Developmenf except as approved by the Director of Community Development," . (renumbers all following numbers) plus delete the condition • that walls go to the ceiling, partitions will be as drawn by •� architect, subject to all other stated conditions and , a requirements, finding that it wiTl not hav�e a significant ' effect on the environment and certifying the Negative DecLaration as adequate. - , , minutesdisk7:min10 ' ; ' ` i 4 i r� ' , MOTION passed by the following vote: � AYES: Commissioners Dove, 'Cole-Dennis, McMiller, Muhsin, Pryor, Willis , NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Haynes ABSTAIN: None - Mr. Karefa-Johnson:left. NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Tentative Parcel Mao No. 12 (TPM 121' Northeast corner of Atlantic and Elmaaood Avenue (Jack S. Keese) . , • Applicant requests approval to combine three (3) parcels into one (1) in the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone. ' Mr. Barfield read pertinent information. � Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing. Jack 5. Keese, 2200 W. Valley Boulevard, Alhambra, California �, 91503, came forward. . Commissioner Muhsin asked how many store will be in the mall and Mr. Keese replied, "Five, maximum." He added that the building has 3600 sq. ft. of space. ' There were no more questions from the Commissioners and no . one in the audience wished to speak in favor of, or in. opposition to the proposal, so Chairperson Dove closed the Public Hearinq. MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner Cole- Dennis, to approve Resolution No. 2306, "A RESOI,UTION OF.THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 21821 TO COMBINE PARCELS 52, 53 AND 54 OF TRACT NO. 7984 MB 90-34-36'PER MAP RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF IAS ANGELES COUNTY," subject to the stated conditions and requirements, and certifying that the project is categorically exempt from he provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3). _ MOTION passed by the following vote: ` AYES: Commissioners Dove, Cole-Dennis, ' McMiller, Pryor, Willis NOESz ' Nane ' ABSENT: , Commissioner Haynes , . ABSTAIN: None minutesdisk7emin10 5 .. . � . � . . . � . . � . 3.. MODIFIED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 32 (cuo 321 , 3680 Imperial Highway (New West Federal Savings and Loan Association) Mr. Fenderson read pertinent information., Chairperson Dove opened the Public,Hearing. ° Ed Zelkie, 445 S. Figueroa, 31st floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071,. rose.to ask for a clarification of some of the � conditions. First. the conditfon requiring the construction ' of two wheelchair ramps, since one is already there only one more is needed. Second, as to reconstruction of sidewalk and- � curb and gutter, he would like this limited to the 80' " •.frontage on Imperial'Highway. Third, as to'reconstruction of the asphalt concrete pavement and cement concrete alley, he • doesn't want to rebuild the entire alley but will repair potholes, etc.., at a cost of not more than $2,000. Chairperson Dove stated the increase.in parking spaces is required.because there just aren't enough spaces for the , buildinq as it is now used. , There being no orie�in the audience wishing to speak in favor of, or in opposition to the proposal, Chairperson Dove closed the Public Hearing. , � Commissioner MaMi2ler asked staff's comments on Mr. Zelkie�s. requests. -Mr. Murga replied that the Public Works Department wants the north/south alley where it meets the east/west ' alley redone. He stated that all the Public Works conditions should cost between $4000 and $6000. Mr, Zelkie stated the number of parking spaces is being ' increased because of the insistence of Mr. Barnes and Mr. Fenderson, and his client's willingness to do so as long as the cost are not to0high. He stated the building was ' approved by the Planning Department in 1983. He stated he is only authorized to go up to $3000, not $6000. � Mr. Fenderson stated the CUP is being revised because the . applicant has changed his intended use for the building, and -. this change resulted in an increased need for parking. The tenants are now using the patrons' spaces and patrons have to park on the street, etc., causing a severe parking problem in the area. The entire situation was caused by the applicant's changed usage of the property. , Commissioner Prgor asked if the number of offices was changed. Mr. Zelkie stated they had started with 30 doctors' offices and changed to general offices. He added that general office usage actually results in less need for spaces than individual doctors' offices. Chairperson Dove asked Mr. Murga if he could be comfortable with $3000 in improvements and Mr. Murga replied that it would have to be closer to $4000 -$6000. ' , Commissioner Pryor stated that, in the past, staff and Commissioners have held fast on two handicapped ramps, repair , of alley and curbs and gutters and he would li� to continue . this practice. -I�Towever, he would be willing to set a cap of $6000�on Public Works improvements. � • minutesdisk7:min10 i i ' 6 ; . . I i Commissioner Cole-Dennis stated her agreement with Commissioner Pryor. Commissioner Muhsin asked if a fee was charged for use of the , spaces and Mr. Fendeson replied that they are free. . " Commissioner Pryor stated he had visited the facility and � there a dire need for more parking spaces. MOTION by Commissioner Pryox, SECONDED by Commissioner Cole- Dennis, to approve Resolution No. 2309, "A RESOLUTION OF THE , PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING MODIFIED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 32 FOR OFF-STREET PARKING _ IMPROVEMENTS IN THE HMD (HOSPITAL-MEDICAL-DENTAL) ZONE AT ,.. ;-3680 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNZA," subject to the stated conditions and requirements, with a cap of.$6000 on ` Public Works improvements and finding that it will not have a � - significant effect on the environment and certifyinq.the . Negative Declaration as adequate. � MOTZON passed by the following vote: � -, AYES: Commissioners Dove, Cole-Dennis, McMiller, Muhsin, Pryor, Willis NOES: None `, ABSENT: Commissioner Haynes ABSTAIN: None 4, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 33 (CUP 331 .' 12506 Waldorf Drive (Guido Sacirio) Applicant requests approval to develop a two-story duplex in " the R-2 (Two Family Residential ) zone. ' Mr. Barfield read pertinent information. ' Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing and Guido Sacirio, 8615 E. Florence Avenue, Downey, CA 91240, rose to discuss three conditions. First, Condition No. 13, for a block wall ' fence. -At a previous meeting the garage was moved to the property-line so he would,like that. area exempt from the block wall fence. Mr. Fenderson agreed that the block wall ` fence should extend from each side of the garage. Next, was a 4' fence in front required? Mr. Fenderson stated that a 4' fence in front was not mandatory, a front fence just couldn't be nay higher than 4' should the applibant desire � to build a fence in front. Concerning Condition No. 30, Mr. Sacirio wants one lateral with two separate pipes joining in , �, the £ront yard, rather than two separate laterals to the � City's sewer. Mr. Murga stated staff prefers two laterals, ! one for'each building, but the Commissioners could approve ' only one lateral. Mr. Murga then discussed seven more conditions of the Public � Works Department not in the Resolution, which included ' conditions for a grading plan, reconstruction of curb and - gutter,' reconstruction of a driveway apron, pruning of a , tree, planting of trees, regrading of-parkway and landscaping and installation of a marbelite street light. � � �I � � �� minutesdisk7:min10 � � ` � 1� 7 � , � ; • . . ' � Fernando Quintana 8415 Florence Avenue, Downey, CA 90240, ` rose to dispute the additional seven conditions, especially the required marbelite street light. - • It was agreed that.staff and the applicant can deal with the sewer laterals after approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Quintana then accepted six of the new conditions but � continued to dispute the need of the new marbelite street light. � Mr. Murga agreed that street lights are now there, but it is the policy of the City to have them modernized by people improving their property. He stated the cost should be about $2000: Commissioner Willis suggested pe'rhaps staff and the , applicants should sit down again and see if they can reach some agreement. The two applicants, Mr. Sacerio and Mr. Quintana discussed the sewer laterals and it was agreed that this could be worked out with Public Works'staff later. Commissioner Pryor asked Mr. Murga if he could settle for the � street light already there, and Mr. Murga restated that it is ` the policy of the City to have them modernized by people ,. improving their property at the time they improve their property. Commissioner McMiller stated that building is a privilege, '„ and he would like to keep building standards high, as they ' are now. I£ owners want to improve their properties, they should be willing to pay for improvements that will enhance . ', the City, such as marbelite street lights. _ Commissioner Muhsin stated the project would be incomplete without a new street light. " Mr. Barnes suggested the second sentence in Condition No. 30 should be deleted. There being no one else wishing to speak in favor of, or in • opposition to the proposal, Chairperson,Dove closed the , Public Hearing. .• A lengthy discussion regarding the`street light, its distance from the property (150 'ft.) and possible,cost to Mr. Sacirio ensued between Commissioners the applicants and Mr. Murga. Chairperson Dove suggested the City 'could pay for the wiring and installation and Mr. Sacirio could pay for the marbelite street light pole. Cominissioner Pryor asked Mr. Murga if this could be done with Public Works funds and Mr. Murga replied in the,affirmative. Commissioner Muhsin asked the `�total cost of wiring and pole and both applicants and Chairperson Dove discussed this without coming to an actual dollars and cents cost. " � . Mr. Barnes suggested an amendment could be added stating.that the applicant will provide funds for the purchase of a. marbelite pole to the Public Works Department and the Public . Works Department will purchase the entire street light and , wiring from the Edison Company. � minutesdisk7:min10 � �� I g I . f . , i • . � , � There being nb one else wishing to speak in favor of, or in . � opposition to the proposal, Chairperson Dove closed the Public Hearing. Commissioner Willis commented that Public Works staff attend site meetings as needed. Mr., Murga replied that although the Public Works staff have missed some meetings, they always' , attend when they can. They have a.staff problem. He stated they will make a stronger effort to attend site meetings. ` MOTION by Commissioner McMiller to approve Resolution No. " 2310, ^A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSZON OF THE CITY OF � LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAI, USE PERMZT NO. 33 FOR TAE , CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2) TWO-STORY DUPLEXES AT 12505 WALDORF .DRIVE.AVENUE, IN THE R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, `� LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, 90262," subject to the stated conditions and requirements, deleting the condition for separate laterals (second sentence in Condition No. 30}, with the applicant providing funds for the marbelite street light to the Public Works Department and the Public Works Department _ purchasing the entire street light and wiring from Edison Company and certifying that the project is categorically ° exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as � amended by Section 15061 b(3). There being no second, Commissioner McMiller withdrew the MOTION. MOTION by Commissioner Pryor to approve Resolution No. 2310, ' "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF � LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITZONAL USE PERMIT NO. 33 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2) TWO=STORY DUPLEXES AT 12505 WALDORF DRIVE AVENUE, IN THE R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALTFORNIA, 90262," subject to the stated conditions �. and requirements, deleting the condition for separate laterals, (second sentence in Condition No, 30), deleting the condition for an installed marbelite street light and ' certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the , provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section - 15061 b(3). There being no second, Commissioner Pryor withdrew the MOTION. MOTZON by Commissioner McMiller, SECONDED by Commissioner . Muhsin, to approve Resolutioa No. 2310, "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY' OF LYNWOOD APPROVZNG CONDITIONAL.USE PERMIT NO. 33 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2) • TWO-STORY DUPLEXES.AT 12505 WALDORF DRIVE AVENUE, IN THE R-2 , (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, 90262," subject to.the stated conditions and requirements, deleting the condition for separate laterals (second sentence in , Condition No. 30), with the applicant providing funds for the marbelite street light,to the Public Words Department and the � Public Works Department purchasing the entire street light and wiring from the •Edison Company and certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3). � � Commissioner Cole-Dennis was not present, so will not be , included in any more.votes.. I ' minutesdisk7:�'in10 9 I ; � � . . . � . I MOTION passed by the following vote: , AYES: Commissioner pove, McMiller, Muhsin NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Haynes ABSTAIN: Commissioners Pryor, Willis " 5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 34 (CUp 341 4160 Carlin Avenue (Alfred Brown) Applicant requests approval to develop a two-story dwelling unit in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) 2one. Mr. Fenderson added an additional condition: Condition 15b. All building elevations shall be treated with consistent front facade. Alfred Brown, 2244 N. Bullis Road, Lynwood, CA, 90262, rose to discuss several conditions. First, Condition No. 13. Mr. Brown asked to waive the fence until the alley vacation has taken place, also he would rather have wrought iron fencing so he can see his neighbors, instead of cement blocks. Mr Murga stated the alley vacation will not take place for six months to a year. Second, Condition No. 21. Two wheelchair ramps might cost quite a sum of money, he's not a developer, he's not doing this to make money. Also, two laterals are not needed, one should be adequate, because he's just build- ing for his family. Why is another street light needed? ; There is a street light there now, and he doesn't want to have to add another street light, please waive this condi- tion. Mr. Brown stated he can live with the rest of the conditions. There being no one else wishing to speak in favor of, or in opposition to the proposal, Chairperson Dove closed the Public Hearing. Commissioner Pryor stated it should cost approximately $6000 for these improvements, and that's not counting fencing. Chairperson Dove stated his willingness to drop the fence along the alley until the vacation of the alley has been , completed. Mr. Barnes stated there should be a time limit, such as two years. A discussion folloved as to wrought iron fencing, chain link fencing and block wall fencing which included Mr. Brown and most of the Commissioners. � Chairperson Dove stated the cost of two wheelchair ramps given to one property owner seemed unfair. Commissioner Pryor stated that since the property is only one house from each corner, that's less than the 150' usually followed by the Commission in the past to require the building of wheelchair ramps. ininutesdisk7:min10 10 Chairperson Dove asked:if the same wording could be used concerning the laterals as in the previous case. he then asked Mr. Murga where the street light is located and Mr. Murga replied that it is directly in front of the property. Chairperson Dove then asked if the same wording could be used concerning the cost of the pole as in the previous case. Ae then asked for input �oncerning the wheelchair ramps and Commissioner Pryor replied that two have been demanded in previous cases in the past. Mr. Barnes suggested a 6' high wrought iron fencing could be used in the back and then just moved back when_the alley vacation is complete and Mr. Brown indicated his acceptance of such a fence. .- MOTION by Commissioner Muhsin, SECONDED by Commissioner Willis, to approve Resolution No. 2311, "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 34 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AT 4260 CARLIN AVENUE, IN THE R-3 (MULTI-FAMZLY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, 90262�'� subject to the stated conditions and requirements, except amended as follows: Condition No. 13. Applicant will provide wrought iron fencing to present property line, more to be added upon vacation of alley. Applicant will provide funds for purchase of marbelite pole to Public Works Department and Public Works Department will purchase entire street light and wiring from the Edison Company. Delete condition requiring separate laterals, certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3). MOTION carried by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Dove, McMiller, Muhsin, Pryor, Willis NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Haynes, Cole-Dennis (left early) ABSTAIN: None Note to secretary: It was 10:15 and I left, but Mr. Barfield told me it adjourned about 10:45 p.m. 6. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. (ZOA 6) Multiple-Tenant Retail Ordinance Amendment Case No. ZOA 6 Regulating Area Of Vendor Space City-/Wide. ' Staff proposes to amend Chapter 25, the official Zoning Ordinance with respect to Multi-Tenant Retail Centers City Wide. Mr. Barfield presented the staff report by providing back- ground information on development standards regarding area of . vendor space in the current code for multiple-tenant space as being deficient with respect to tenant area size. � minutesdisk7:min10 � 11 I Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing. Since no one was in the audience, therefore, no one spoke in favor of, or in opposition to the proposal. Chairperson Dove closed the Public Aearing. MOTION by Com�issioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissionei Willis, to adopt Resolution No. 2312, "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 25-11.3 (10), THE OFFZCZAL ZONING CODE WITH RESPECT TO REGULATING AREA VENDOR SPACE CITY WIDE." MOTION carried by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Dove, McMiller, Muhsin, Pryor, Willis . NOES: None ABSENT: Cole-Dennis (left early), Haynes ABSTAIN: None . REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS STAFF COMMENTS PUBLIC ORALS None. COMMISSION ORALS - A W OURNMENT • MOTION was made by Commissioner Pr or to adjourn to the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission on February 13, 1990 SECONDED by Commissioner Muhsin, and carried � unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 10:45 p.m. I � � i ' i i �_ 'i i ' minutesdisk7:min10 � i I I I �L i I