HomeMy Public PortalAbout12-08-87 PLANNING COMMISSION v t
.. . . > �: �".
` :i
� � ��a��lG/�p—
CiTY OF LYNN/OOp I
CI7Y CLER!<S OfFIC�
: AGENDA A � DEC0�1987,�
7 i�i 9 ilDilli12�1i2i3 i 4 i � 6
LY�WOOD CITY PLANNIMG COMMISSION � � �
, _ ,� ,�,,�.�, �'��,
�;
REGULAR MEETING 7:30 P. M. �� ��
LYNWOOD CITY HALL, 11330 BULLZS ROAD �}���� ��'z�
DECEMBER 8, 1987
� ��
� LUCILLE KAPIKA
CHAIRPERSON
DONALD DOVE EUGEP�E RAY�10ND -�
VICE-CHAIRPERSON CON,�IISSIONER
LENA COLE DENNIS � DAVID J, WILLIS, JR,
COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER
ROY PRYOR �
COi�.MISSIONER I
CITY STAFF I
DIRECTOR OF COt�.MUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNERS �
Ibrethea Tilford I
�VICENT_E L. MAS Acting Senior Planner
COM*{ISSION COUNSEL
Henry S, Aarbosa ,
Douglas D. Barnes - ' "� � � �
i
\
��
_:, �
� �
DECEMBER 8, 1987
OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Call meeting to order.
B. Flag Salute:
C. � Roll Call.
D'. Certification of Agenda posting
E. Approval of Minutes of November 10, 1987
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Zonina Ordinance Amendment - Case No. 87079
AB 2020 - "The Bottle Bill"
Comments : �
� Proposed ordinance establishing recycling centers to accept
redeemable beverage containers in compliance with the new
law enacted by the 1986 session of the State Legislature.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfizlly request that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2153:
a. Finding that the proposed amendment is exempt from the
� provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended
[Section 15061,(b) (3)].
b.' Recommending that the City Council approve the Findings
in Resolution No. 2153, waive reading and introduce the
proposed ordinance.
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS:
' 2. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87091
12039 Long Beach Blvd. (Pierre Maxwell)
Comments•
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to operate a second-hand store at subject address in
the C-2A (Medium Commercial) zone.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully request that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2155:
V10:AGENDA
1
\
J�
• •
a. Finding that Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 87091, is
categorically exempt from the provisions of the State
CEQA Guidelines, as amended.
b. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 87091, subject to
the stated conditions and requirements.
3. Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 87098
4516 Arlington Avenue - (Nathaniel Roberson)
Comments•
' The applicant is requesting Tentative Parcel Map approval
to consolidate two (2) lots into one at the subject address
in the R-3 (Multi-family Residential) zone.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2161:
a. Finding that Tentative Parcel Map No. 19342, Case No.
87098, is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA, "`
Guidelines, as amended (Section 15061 b 3).
b. Approving Tentative Parcel Map, Case No. 87098, subject
' to stated conditions and requirements.
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS
STAFF COMMENTS
a. Proposed zoning ordinance amendment concerning the sale
of alcoholic beverages -- status of revision.
� b. Project Area "A" - Preliminary Plan approved by City
Council on November 17, 198Z.
c. Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Parking for mini-ma11s
approved by City Council on November 17, 1987.
d. Update on redevelopment projects.
COMMISSION ORALS
PUBLIC ORALS
(Information items only)
2
,i
J� .
• •
ADJOURNMENT
� Adjourn to the next regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on January 12, 1988, at 7:30 p.m:, in the City
Ha11 Council Chambers, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood,
California.
V10:AGENDA
3
�. �
MIN•ES OF A REGULAR�MEETING •
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA
'' TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, ].987
OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Call to Order
A• regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of
Lynwood was called to order by Chairperson Kanka on the
above-captioned date at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of
the Lynwood City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood,
California, 90262.
�B. Pledae of Alleaiance
Commissioner pove led the Pledge of Allegiance.
C. Roll Ca1:L of. Commissioners
Chairperson Kanka requested the roll call, and Dorethea
Tilford complied.
Present: Commissioner ponald Dove
Commissioner Lucille Kanka
Commissioner Roy Pryor
Commissioner David J. Willis, Jr.
MOTION.by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner pove, �
to grant an excused absence for Commissioner Raymond, who was
ill. MOTION carried unanimously.
Vicente Mas informed the Commission that Commissioner Reid
had submitted his resignation on November 6, 1987. Mr. Mas
� stated that the City Council will be informed and the City
Clerk will advertise for a replacement for Commissioner Reid.
Absence of Commissioner Cole-Dennis was not discussed.
Also present: Doug Barnes, Assistant to Henry Barbosa, City
Attorney �
Dorethea Tilford
Acting Senior Planner, Planning Division
Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
Jim.Devore
Associate Engineer
Public Works Department
Joy Valentine, Minutes Clerk
D. ApProval of Minutes
Vicente Mas Stated that, per the Brown Act, the agenda had
been duly posted.
MOTION b ove and Dhe minutesDoD Octoberlslgone1987l1ias
to app
I p,resented to the Commission.
The motion carried by the following vote:
DISK 22:PLANCOMM
1
_ . � �
� AYES: ' Commissioners Dove, Kanka, Pryor, Willis
� NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis and Raymond
ABSTAIN: None
, CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING
1. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87057
12017 Atlantic Avenue (Leonel Vasquez)
The applicant is requesting an approval of a Conditional
• Use Permit to rebuild a mini-market, with off-sale
alcoholic beveraqes.
Staff requested that the Planning Commission deny this
Conditional Use Permit because the applicant has not
responded to communications from staff.
Chairperson Kanka opened the Public Hearing. She asked
if anyone wished to speak in favor of the special permit.
No one came forward. She asked if anyone wanted to speak
. against the special permit.
Ray Chavira, 11434 Plum Street, Lynwood, California,
stated his opposition becuase the Commission had already
extended the time for response from applicant beyond what
he understood as the limit. -y
Chairperson Kanka closed the Public Hearing. A short
discussion followed, then Chairperson Kanka requested a
motion. r.
MOTION made by Commissioner Willis, and SECONDED by
Commissioner pove to deny the Conditional Use .Permit
because of� the, non-responsiveness on the part of the
' applicant.
The �motion carried by the followinq vote:
i
P.YES: Commissioners Dove, Kanka, Prior, Willis
� NOES: None
ABSENT: . Commissioners Cole-Dennis and Raymond
ABSTAIN:'' None '
2. Conditional Use-Permit - Case No. 87060
• 3562 Beechwood Avenue (Maria Briseno)
This is an application for a Conditional Use Permit to
develop a two-story triplex at the rear of an existing
single-family dwelling at above address.
Mr. Mas stated that Mrs. Briseno has financial
difficulties because she alleged she was not aware of the
� school fees'at the time she applied for the Conditional
� Use Permit, and therefore, she is unale to obtain a loan
at this time. She planned to develop the lot to its
fullest potential, but since this is financially
impossible, she is revising the plan by scalinq it down.
� Mr. Mas said some of her problems may stem from a
languaqe barrier. Therefore, instead of a simple denial
of the application, Mr. Mas requested that the Commission
' deny the application without prejudice. This will enable
' ,
DISK 22:PLANCOMM
2
I �
� ,
. . � �
Mrs. Briseno to reapply as soon as she is able to
downscale her plan and obtain financing. If the
Commission grants a simple denial, she will have to wait
for twelve months before reapplying.
Chairperson Kanka opened the Public Hearing aiid asked for
comments for or against the Conditional Use Permit.
Receiving none, she closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Mas further explained that Mrs. Briseno contends that
she wasn't given enouqh information concerning City
requirements and conditions of approval before she
applied for the Conditional Use Permit. The Director
explained to Mrs. Briseno that the fees must be paid
before the various City departments investigate any
proposed Conditional Use Permit applications, because
substantial expenditures are incurred durinq
investigation and the fees paid by the applicant are
' expected to cover the expenses.
' MOTION made by Commissioner Pryor, and SECONDED by
' Commissioner Willis, to deny without prejudice Case No.
87057 because the applicant needs additional time to
submit the revised site plans for this project.
The motion carried by the following vote:
' AYES: Commissioners Dove, Kanka, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None ��
ABSENT:. Commissioners Cole-Dennis and Raymond
� ABSTAIN: None
At this ti'me, Chairperson Kanka asked that Item No. 6 be
discussed t�efore Item No. 3 becaus'e Mr. Devore had to leave
early. The Commissioners agreed; therefore, Item No. 6 was
discussed.
3. Tentative Percel Map - Case No. 87093
10761 Alameda Avenue (Ira Jones)
Applicant requests approval of a Tentative Parcel Map to
consolidate several lots into one at the above address.
Staff reguested that the Planning Commission adopt
Resolution No: 2157, approving. Tentative Parcel Map No.
19240 and find that it is exempt from the provisions of
the State CEQA Guidlines, as amended (Section 15061 b 3).
Chairperson Kanka opened the Public Hearing. Since no
one wanted to speak for or against the Tentative Parcel
Map, the Public Hearing was closed.
Commissioner pove asked .if. the .applicant had . been
informed he should be in attendance. Dorethea Tilford
stated that Mr. Jones had been so informed and he had no
problem with any of the conditions imposed by the City.
Mr. Mas. stated that this lot consolidation was only for
legal reasons and all of the property is owned by the
applicant. The site is fully developed.
Mr. Devore stated that the vacations have already been
ordered by the City Council. The owner has agreed to
� relocate the fire hydrant presently on the prope�"ty and
' has assured staff that he will meet all conditions
' imposed by the various utilities; those conditions have
hot been received. i
DISK 22:PLANCOMM
3
i
. � �
� Commissioner Willis and Mr. Devore discussed the
boundaries of the property and Mr. Devore assured
Commissioner Willis that Mr. Jones, the property owner,
is willing to comply with any conditions imposed by the
City of Los Angeles.
MOTION made by Commissioner pove, SECONDED by
� Commissioner Pryor, to adopt Resolution No. 2157, "A
RESOIUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
, LYNW�OD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19240 TO
CONSULIDATE , LOTS AND VACATED STREETS AND ALLEYS INTO
THRE� (3) PARCELS, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PROPOSED
��
SUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS OF BLOCKS 'A', 'B', AND ' IN
THE WATTS PARK TRACT, IN THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, COiJNTY OF
LOS ANGELES; CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON MAP RECORDED IN BOOK
8, PAGE 70 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, AND OF PARCEL
1 AND PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 13917, RECORDED IN BOOK
144, PAGE 61 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY" and
finding that said parcel map is exempt from the
provisions of the State CEQA Guidlines, as amended
' (Section 1506I, b 3).
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Kanka, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis and Raymond
ABSTAIN: None
Jim Devore left the Planning Commission meeting at 8:35 p.m.
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS
4'. Conditional Use Permit No. 87081
3.710 Lynwood Road (Natalie Fears)
The applicant is requesting approval.of a Conditional Use
Permit to build a single family dwelling at the above
• address in an R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone.
Staff has requested that 'the Commission find that
Conditiona.l Use Permit 87081 will not have a significant
effect on the environment and approve said permit. Staff
stated that the lot is not quite wide enough, but because
of its irregular shape the Director granted a zoning
' ordinance adjustment, pursuant to Section 25-30 of the
Zoning Ordinance.
Chairperson Kanka opened the Public Hearing licantEll�e
Fea;�s rose to speak for his daughter, the app
said she would accept all conditions except Condition No.
9, �which is for a 6 foot block wall fence to enclose the
pro�erty, except in front. where the block fence is to be
only four feet high. Because of his experience with his
block wall fence during. the last earthquaKe (it
collapsed), Mr. Fears would prefer chain link or wood
fencing.
A short discussion followed, with Mr. Mas stating With
the City's policy is to ask for block wall fencing
new construction in the R-2 and R-3 zones. He stated
that newer block wall fences are reinforced.
Commissioner Pryor stated that wood deteriorates and Mr.
Mas agreed. Mr. Fears stated that surrounding properties
all have chain link fences. Commissioner Pryor replied
that chain link fences do not serve as buffers or offer
f � any privacy. Commissioner pove stated that block wall
I� fencing adds to the total property value.
DISK 22:PLANCOMM
4
�
I
,' � Chai'_�person • ka inquired about the cor• ct location of
the �roperty. She thought the lot would be the first one
at the intersection of Bullis/Lynwood Road. Ms. Tilford
remarked that the assessors map shows it as the second
lot from the corner of Lynwood & Bullis Road. Mr. Mas
explained that houses were demolished for the freeway,
because a much wider freeway was planned than was
� actually built, therefore, CALTRANS has been selling some
of the properties it acquired for the freeway.
Chairperson 'Kanka asked if California l�o r�heirprevious
CALTRANS offer to sell the property
owner, before selling to someone else. Mr. Mas said he
thought the property should have been offered first to
the City of Lynwood, second, to the school district, and
thirdly, to the previous oWni�•W uld been�
to purchase the property,
public auction.
There beinq no one wishing to speak for or against the
• Conditional Use Permit application, Chairperson Kanka
closed the Public Hearing:
Commissioner Pryor stated that six foot block fences
should not be mandatory on single family residences,
although he believed they should be constructed with
multiple units.
Mr. Fears stated that although the surrounding properties
are all zoned R-2, only single family dwellings are on
the properties have chain link fences, or dilapidated
wood fences.
There was a discussion relative to whether CALTRANS acted
properly in selling the subject site before contacting
the previous owner.
' Mr. Barnes stated that this property might be a poor
business risk since there maybe a cloud over the owner-
ship of the property, however, the Commission is only
concerned with conditions required by the City of�Lynwood.
� MOTION made by Commissioner pove,. and SECONDED by
Comniissioner Pryor, •to amend Condition No. 9 to provide
' for a block wall fence on the rear of the property and
acceptable fencing on the reamining perimeter of the
property.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
, AYES: Commissioners Dove, Kanka, Pryor, Willis
NOES• None �
ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis and Raymond
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION made' by Commissioner Pryor and SECONDED by
Commissioner pove finding that Resolution No. 2145, "A
RESOLUTION OE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87081 FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH ATTACHED
ALIFONRIARAIN OHEPROZERTWOAFAMILY RESIDENTIALD�ZONE OOD,
DISK 22:PLANCOMM'
I 5
(
' _
^ MOTION carrie�by the following vote: •.
. AYES: Commissioners Dove, Kanka, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis and Raymond
� ABSTAIN: None
4. Zonin Ordinance Amendment - Case No. 87079
AB 20/20 - "The Bottle Bill"
This is a proposed ordinance establishing recycling
centers, to accept redeemable beverage containers in
compliance with the new law enacted by the 1986 session
of the California State Legislature.
Staf� recommends that the Planning Commission adopt
Reso•lution No. 2153 , recommending that the City Council
waiv�a reading, introduce the proposed ordinance and find
the +proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State
CEQA Guidelines, as amended (Section 15061 b 3).
Mr. Mas stated that State law establishes convenience
zones whithin a:half mile cirFle near super markets, and
� gives six such zones to Lynwood. Either reverse vending
or mobile recgcling units are acceptable.
' Chairperson Kanka opened the Public Hearing and asked if -�
anyone wished to speak for the proposed ordinance.
Elmer Hahan, 4222 Sanborn Avenue. Lynwood, California
rose to state his support because of the possible job
openings.
Ray Chavira, 11434 Plum Street, asked if the new Boy's
Market in the Lynwood Town Center will be covered. Mr.
Mas replied in the affirmative. Another circle will be
created each time a new market is built in the City. Mr.
Chavira then asked what happens when circles originating
in two different cities overlap and Mr. Mas replied that
dominance will probably be dictated by the location of
the supermarket.
Chairperson Kanka asked if anyone else wanted to speak,
either .for or against the proposed ordinance. No one
spoke, so Chairperson Kanka closed the public hearing.
Mr. Barnes� stated that each supermarket is required to
� have one recyclinq center. He further stated that the
proposed ordinance is more generous than required by the
' State, and, perhaps the present ordinance should be more
' ' restrictive, depending upon the wishes of the
Commission. The City attorney asked if the Commission
wishes to encouraqe as many recycling center as
possible or would it prefer to limit these centers to the
minimum required by the State.
Commissioner pove stated he was ambivalent about the
subaect, but he did not want anything that would cause a
rod'ent problem, and he considers recycling a good idea.
He �stated he leans more towards being less liberal, and
wousd like to see only two to three centers.
Mr.� Mas stated that there are two reverse vending
machines now operating in Lynwood; and the City has
received no complaints.
' DISK 22:PLANCOMM
, 6
i
' Commissioner • illis stated his prefe• ce for more
restrictive measures; he definitely wanted rodent
control.
Mr. Barnes stated that most objections are towards open
bins generally no complaints have been received about
� reverse vending machines. He stated that the.State has
orde'�ed all cities to accept bins, but the cities can
insist the bins be removed or locked when no operator is
, present.
MOTION was made by Commissioner Pryor and SECONDED by
Commissioner. Dove to request Mr. Barnes to draft a more
restrictive ordinance and that this matter be continued
to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
December 8, 1987-
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Kanka, Pryor, Willis
Noes:. None
,
ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis and Raymond
' ABSTAIN: None
5. Zonin Ordinance Amendment - Case No. 87088
Section 25-33 - Sign Regulations
An amendment to the Lynwood Municipal Code Section 25- �"
16.17 pertaining to the maximum height of an on-premises,
free-standing, non-freeway oriented sign permitted on
sites developed with service stations.
Staff requested that the Planning Commission adopt
Resolution No. 2156, find that the proposed amendment is
exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidlines,
as amended, Section 15303, Class 3 and recommend that the
� City Council approve the findings in Resolution No. 2156,
' waive reading and introduce the proposed ordinance.
Chairperson Kanka opened the Public Hearing. Hearing no
responses for or against the proposed ordinance
amendment, the Public Hearing was closed.
MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, and SECONDED by
Commissioner pove to adopt Resolution No. 2159, "A
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
LYNTAOOD RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF AN
AME;QDMENT TO SECTION 25-16.17 OF THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL
COD''� TO ALLOW THE ON-PREMISES, FREE-STANDING SIGN TO
�. EXTi�ND TO THIRTY-FIVE (3 FEET IN HEIGHT WHERE A SITE
IS �DEVELOPED TO SERVICE STATION STANDARDS." and finding
that the proposed amendment is exempt from the provisions
of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended, Section 15303,
Class 3.
The motion carried by the following vote:
• AYES: Commissioners Dove, Kanka, Pryor; Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis and Raymond
� ABSTAIN: None
. REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS
DISK 22:PLANCOMM
7
I
' Proposed Preliminar• Plan to select boundaries for the third
amendment to Project Area "A".
Mr. Mas presented the staff report indicating as follows:
California Redevelopment Law requires that the Planning
Commission select boundaries and adopt a preliminary plan for the
amendment of the Redevelopment Project Area. This is part of the
' overall'Redevelopment Plan adoption process which will be subject
to the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended.
Staff requests that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No.
2159 which approves'the preliminary p.lan selectin.g boundaries and
transmitting the plan to the Redevelo�pment Agency.
' Mr.. Mas stated the Redevelopment Plan was expanded in 1976. and
again in 1980; and there is now a problem with Gerrymandering.
He explained that one of the problems,now present when developers
want to improve an area is that the developer has to pay for all
improvements up front. If the Redevelopment Agency could acquire
the property, cover the expenses as needed, then the money would
be recovered in six to eight years by the increased taxes
received by the City.
Chairperson Kanka opened the Public Hearing.
Ray Chavira asked if Long Beach Boulevard, south of Fernwood,
would be included under the Planned'Commercial Development Zoning
'District. Mr. Mas replied in the negative, the area is not large
enough. , -�
There bein<� no one else wishing to speak, Chairperson Kanka
closed the �ublic Hearing.
MOTION by Commissioner pove, SECONDED by Commissioner Pryor, to
adopt Resolution No. 2159, "A'RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
PLANNING COMMISSION SELECTING THE BOUNDARIES OF AMENDMENT NO. 3
TO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT "A" AREA AND APPROVING A PRELIMINARY
PLAN FORMULATED FOR AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
uAn
' The motion carried by the following vote:
' AYES: Commissioners Dove, Kanka, Pryor, Willis
� NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis and Raymond
ABSTAIN: None
STAFF COMMENTS
a. Mr. Mas stated he had received a draft of the alcoholic
beverage ordinance from legal counsel and on Wednesday,
November 11, 1987, staff and legal counsel will make a second
draft. Next, staff will meet with concerned citizens and
� business owners presently selling alcoholic beverages and,
after considering all the available input, then a final draft
will be prepared and presented to the Planning Commission,
and then to the City Council. St'aff will use direct mailings,
public notices in local newspapers, and notices posted in
places where people congregate to inform the citizenry of the
Ordinance of Lynwood as progress is made.
` b. The new Senior Planner should be present at the next Planning
Commission meeting, and a new Associate Planner will be
confirmed shortly.
DISK 22:PLANCOMM ` "
. $
�
f
a ' ' c. The Code Enforc•ent Division has been tra�ferred to the
Community Development Department and the City is presently
� recruiting to fill two vacancies.
COMMISSION ORALS
Commissioner Pryor asked if the Commission can initiate action
for Code Enforcement. Mr. Mas replied in the affirmative. Mr
' Mas stated that the Code Enforcement program may be reorganized
to allow officers to issue citations. They will be required to
attend a Police Acedamy to receive training at the level of
quasi-police officers.
� Public Orals i
Mr. Ray Chavira, 11434 Plum Stret stated he will be testifying
before the County...Board of Supervisors on November 19 concerning
the standards on which CUP's for alcoholic beverage sales are
granted. He distributed copies of a letter from the California
Legislature Assembly Committee on Governmental Organization to
California mayors concerning AB 937 which_"will enable the cities
and counties of California to exercise local control over the
numbers, locations and conditions under which alcohol can be sold
in their jurisdictions."
ADJOURNMENT .
There being no further business to come before the Planning
Commission, the MOTION was made by Commissioner, Pryor and
SECONDED by Commissioner Willis to adjourn to the next regular
meeting of the Planning Commission on December 8, 1987, at 7:30
' p.m., in the Council Chambers of Lynwood City Hall.
The motion carried and the meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
APPROVED AS WRITTEN this day of � 1987
. • Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
� Lynwood Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Vicente L. Mas, Secretary
, .
DZSK.22:PLANCOMM
9
/ .. ; .:-�-
�. . •- � � �
� �
� I I C14� IY�/, l �'
� �^� -, � �, � D7O
- ,.. ,
. \ �
� � � •,.) L. ' \ '� . ... . _. .. �.. . .2e�i
DATE: December 8, 1987
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION `
;
�� FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director ;
Community Development Dept.
SUBJECT: PROPOSED RECYCLING ORDINANCE--AB 2020
CASE N0. 87079
PROPOSAL
This is a proposed ordinance to amend the Lynwood Municipal Code
and Zoning Ordinance to specify conditions and procedures for
permitting recycling facilities in the City.
i
BACKGROUND
This matter was continued from the November 10, 1987 meeting of
the 'Planning Commission, in order that the City Attorney could
review the ordinance and provide more restrictive standards.
FACTS
The California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction
Act (AB 2020) was passed in 1986. The Act establishes a beverage �
container recycling program in California by requiring a one-cent �
deposit on all containers and the establishment of Certified
Recycling Centers for the redemption of the containers. At least
one Certified Recycling Center is to be established within a
Convenience Zone. Convenience Zones are the areas within a half '
mile radius of any supermarket that conducts $2 million, or more,
a year in business. There are six (6) Convenience Zones in '
, Lynwood.
The.consumer started to � �
pay the deposit on October 1, 1987, and
a11 .Convenience Zones are to have at least one Certified ;
, Recycling Center by January 1, 1988, or the stores selling
beverages are to redeem the cont,ainers or pay a daily fine.
Recycling centers can take many forms, varying from the unmanned �
reverse vending machine to a parked semi-trailer manned by an
attendant. Because of the variety of types and the potential for
noise, traffic corigestion, loss of parking, litter, vandalism,
; and an undesirable visual impact, the proposed ordinance provides
standards to regulate recycling facilities.
, ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
The proposed ordinance is designed to promote recycling of �
, beverage containters and to make redemption convenient for
consumers. In addition, the City recognizes that a program of
Disk 8:AB2020
. 1 �
� . �_
. . � �
permitting and regulating such uses will allow convenient
recycling facilities, while minimizing potential negative impacts
, to the community.
The ordinance defines the various types of recycling facilities,
making important distinctions between reverse vending machines,
mobile recycling units, small collection facilities, large
collection facilities, and processing facilities. The Lynwood
Municipal Code is amended to allow certain types of recycling
facilities within th'e CB-1 (Controlled Business) zone, provided
the specified criteria and standards are met and administrative
approval is granted by the Community Development Director.
Recycling facilities permitted within this zone include reverse
vending machines and small collection facilities. Small
collection facilities include bulk reverse vending machines or a
grouping of reverse vending machines, kiosk type units,
unattended containters for donation, and mobile units.
The criteria and standards, and the Conditional Use Permit
requirement, have been established to prevent potential negative
impacts to surrounding areas. These impacts may include traffic
congestion, parking, noise, aesthetics, vandalism, and litter.
The ordinance addresses large scale recycling operations,
allowing them in the Manufacturing (M) zone. These facilities
include large collection facilities and processing facilities. "� I
Standards are specified for these facilities so that negative
impacts to surrounding uses are minimized.
Site Plan Review Committee approval will be required prior to a
, public hearing for a Conditional Use Permit before the Planning
Commission.
� ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
The proposal is covered by the general rule that there is no
possibility that the ordinance amendment will have a significant
effect on the environment; therefore, it is not subject to the
, provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended [Section
15061 (b) (3)]. I
RECOMMENDATION I
, Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2153:
a. Finding that the proposed amendment is exempt from the
provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended. I
b. Recommending that the City Council approve the findings �
in Resolution No. 2153, waive reading and introduce the I
proposed ordinance.
I
�
'
Disk S:AB2020 �
I
I
2 I
I
' ;
' _ I
�, .�. .
� �
RESOLUTION NO. 2159
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
,. CITY OF LYNWOOD RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOP-
TION OF AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 25-7 AND
25-11 OF THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE
TO THE PLACEMENT OF CONVENIENCE ZONES AND RE-
CYCLING FACILITIES IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE 1986
CALIFORNIA BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING AND LITTER
REDUCTION ACT (PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION
14500 ET.SEQ.)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
did, pursuant to law, conduct a public hearing on a proposed
amendment to the Lynwood Municipal Code with respect to the above
subject; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing;
and
' WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has determined �°
, that the project is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines, as amended [Section 15061 (b) (3)].
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines as follows: '
. �
A. The proposed ordinance is to amend the Lynwood
Municipal Code, pursuant to the California Beverage
Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act (AB
2020):
B. The proposed amendment will be consistent with the
objectiyes and the development policies of the City
of Lynwood.
C. The proposed amendment will not unreasonably
constrain the use of property by landowners and
developers.
D. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the
' General Plan for the City of Lynwood. Certified
Recycling Facilities are compatible uses within
commercially zoned convenience zones. Larger scale
recycling facilities are compatible uses within
manufacturing zones. �
E. The establishment of recycling facilities without
regulation and control may be detrimental to public
' health, safety and welfare, if not regulated.
� Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby
recommends City Council adoption of the proposed amendment.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th,day of December, 1987, by
' members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
I
�
V10: RES02153
� i
�
, I
} i
_ � �
:�
. � �
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT: �
,� ABSTAIN:
'.
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
Community Development Dept. General Counsel '
. I
�
I
I
" I
i
�
' I
I
I
. � � t �
�
� �
; �
.. �
;
' . I
i
I
(
I
I
' i
I
V10: RES02153 �
i
. I
. �
�
I
j
�
i
I '+
�; , �
� t �vs.r.e
.Y E !�. � .., r� i . �. .� A I il II r.r �� � '�� r � C '� � � � , �j ...
� � ,:, �, i i�.rU� (�>� I r�r, � s_ � ,b ., > � ��, I w '�
� �"� �ii� '� i M �' i � a i �...rtv'' � � t� � � > i ,� ; '"" { � S -
�4 � / I' ti . �Ti �I�� li I'� �� ' . tii � i �'a' �I � .i m �il � zl ^ � s � i �I` < :I.
'I� ' 1'8Y H9 � < I � f IC 2 � n . p /'�� `..
... nUldW�+3�. .. r " l � ^ ,+ ..S- +r � �ds.'*2 fi� . i .i L' ,�,r � t - - � 5 .� .. ? I
�� '�. / :: s„ � iV15 � �'� qA l� 4 i Al¢IC��I ��I( � �� 1 W� �aNnOy�� � x � . 1� jl OA79 , f`� � 4YJ
I �� T A � � ,�,n� �' i��r ,p �W ` :i , , caaa��;a�N � 1 i �+ v i i,.e
4 r' . I Z l�� �. ��I �I I�i V� �. � � � 1!!SI 1 it[.
� aC t6:r i✓ iP" <t"i> C. �a w rlVV �"� I a I 1 i ��i f L Ir � ��� !.cll »�� 8 v ip� V M ,�
I p } i! �� � ��� �il � I�i f � i �I O � 1 I � lJt. I IQ l. �} � i .:1 f "
I' .•: �-. �v� T .� ��1 � � � �'� II� � C � al 1 I� I IIli I M�M1Y 1 � � • ��
♦ �
U � � �
n � i � I �� - f<�i l i� If � i ���� h�N�S �t 1.-�l y � � I�1 :spHi � � „}� r ��
� 4�\t� � �� 1 � ;� . I Y 4 uy*,' !'uniW't I'� �'...��� �!
A � � f
�� w!q�v � 1 . I �. f n .�� .� ti �11�� � II I � � xl ���t 1 �� �. �4,11Y� � N� I
F ' ' P J
` �� i i fJi�;���R fl-i�.,.. I '� i �nie� �'i } {�� ;'
�. � I �Y� � � � :, i� ':. �.�. � ;.��• + ..�I��Y.'� �� . . . il � . i � .�' � ', i 416 � i ia.. !� '
� ., , r.v+x �....
� � ,� 6�: '1 l ♦ 1 i:l � n ' J�v'
� f� N � I F J IN `! U `Nn+.
I p � 1 � . �. e i;. � � :_ i I: j =,. . � r � i ..
� .,,, � . . , :. :. , �
4 '�We � ' 4 I �� � 14 I� � 1 � 'P � Ul .. I V .: I� �
` R �wd� t +o� �. '" tl i i l �I /� I I � i ,>a¢ ', �, I� � 4
�.� � I::� � .. �1 u .h J uoµal�' r?`--1• �I I � li �' . �� �'. a 1.�,".
i �f'� - j � oi �! Yq �""+'- - �{f d n,., ,� �t II S{ I � � i � ,�.
�� � � I �� ��....c a+� � � � � !2 ��� �� � a� i63 �� L ' +c"Si 1 �� ,M'. I ` 5 �.
t � / i „� k ' ���� �•. r � 1s � y 1 f " � �� , � r � �� �� l�M r � — �. .!. ��r' 1 �k
� �lam� t1� �..�.r.. �,n,i� i4 � ..�\\ �Nl�'�r�` ���� a �6a�„�� � .,� ,�i,�'�oJne�s?.d� ,� +�� I +`.
} : � i�vf 1 s Y$ .n a�'�� Q., }a�-� f�`� FI% t "'} �� � Y � -
p�a �' i E u J.ii � w"� ,r. � �L�j ; r-L� s `,. a`n evHJdU �. �'Y �. j ��.L
� i . '� �� {) .�,�OOh1Ll'1 I. !Y` 7 � i4�1 e � . : w 1 iw„� . �l � : '.
� .i .. t �l n !L . i '. �l I 6 '�: � �5" `}� 'N 1; 1 7 �� jH� �� `�
C ri �d .-u "w . r�� 9,�! .` � �(U V tC { .�sA� c,V'if i ri
r � �� p ^"r� y n��,j�9 ( n ' � ?I ,, � ro . RlA6 . .Cr�,y, w.: �
` � � 9• � � . N nr �'5 f Gi ._ "
I } 1 5 �r.. ,: t �1., Ili�s t � T.. i Er ' � tI�M . ..�� w•,4 .,;,�;+n"'�°'�_ �n� i, �' �
.. ' z iy Y, { .� T 1 :
�� L F �` q P` ' � i i,d � F �\ � �>,yia • . �M y,n IY�II �'' � ,_ ;' � °���, .
� 'I �' ' . ' ' � k ' '+ e� j i�na r /i ° � ' n� ! „ r '�� ��� °,1 �,r...
�i� i .t � .: � t�" '' � : � e 4 ' 4F i� � . : Q �i y �y4i Ij � � Lf � , � � .. r�:
�1 �� IY}i J �' i� . i!` �, � �+'S / hi.� ic �� �\ i' if. Ru W n i k � 1 W �'w` I :" 1 zj' Z{
1 � �.;a � { . � � 4 . �n / �.< �j` J L` r „ /� . a �� � 'h sa� i 9• l ; J , fi
,, h � , i � � �. . k i r ri. i W r W - '� zi _: -4'
( i � � \. k � �i� �C i, �/ • -+ �B ' ��h ��SL� aY � � �)a 3ry � ` �3��M ` �.\1 , aGP Iyl ly.u� 9N NN�H
j"v � i �� ;�' � ! � t I y r II+1J �( '� a 4� �9 � <m uy � 4'� � y `tiy: • n�� 1 =
� i'. � . ,.�t2F 4 � � ��` �(� `� t rr� � .ia .d . � i;� �� �� ° ".0 n.. i G ��/�• �j L� � ��1 „ .�
�� T n�� E �'�' r � / 9 n o\ «xi" '.t
7 � u � `i ��i dlf �r- � . i� 4�C. r �.i ¢ ,�1 � o .
. z, �'y y , r �3Y � y "f�� ` �,,. ` � °� t `?^ T i1 � '::
� r r•+VML, h N� •�, �1 �x .�7 � � `^ i 3` ` a,.'/' y 3 si5 i �' �
� : < . "'SAr . �1� �"�u y• t �/�/i � � � . Vy r ' U ^' r � �� +��'' �1
� , I ' '�lH� � l F ✓..'�� .,� *4 � L �y"n'y��l 3 ;., �� i i � , �V � �� .
� ,.a<<u� � F� � i . r� � �i�� � - yb.� ��:LYll�j Y . �. °po � < � �� � uo���.
~ l�� � �i SL R' '. � i / 4+�i d � ) •ez� , 3 , . ''"� � 'n
1 ..�fi �-� ri' Y -' c, t if �� jr 1� '�.��. 1 q�+�`�,R'� . �.rl �.r� w� �fi 2! ,v�i. I � ��oomu
{ �:�� � � ��. c : r a% ��. , .. q� 'l1 ...i.-. L I�'v� ` �eso�� . �� ���
,�G �' �i"� � �� �. � /� .:' '- �.��4u a ,i 'ir �� ': �c�i s ' � -��
y ` �� 2 ii .� :' ��`¢..�: r � J` � � �h ' � �� 11��3'�, � oEl ,i.p- N . �� y` , � ' i � R �t
/ Q t� 1 � E� ' � f �- ( . . - �r•a. i> ►.+{':'
� �' i F � '� i� � d � itJ ' 'Hlvd %��� �!. n Ng �'y� f .GC h�°'� ,f
♦ � � � 1 i � ..P '�i f �' � i �.. . r � „ c�,� y �'�_'�lg��. r d '
f g-e,� � ��I n„� ' i �q� � r ' 1M :
, O -• ' �� . Y l � r f .: ry " i .f :- � �s'. ti ((� II' � a � 6 ��-�.
�@ � I \ x ,,,, f+a�` J6 c r � t �. ) Ng 4 �' � °t '�Q VIaY` �. �y � � � :
f . _h ti , - ,ti,�' y�µx�i f�� � ! �68„ n¢, .�i i � �� Ia7i yoH �°�." . I7.� . 'v ' lh� r .
�, tR�' ' �. ` nr.ve+ i ia ; � .��� .,,�}� 'e � . � � �. � i ;�,e ���.
'.. � .: . � .. 4 . / ,{r
j �. . . . { ' . ",;.,�� 1 1 '" . , 1� G 7r/H d�/ .. atoH . D6 , r,�e � i 4+r. � r' A ..
�( ��. 5 1� � O ( e Y Xf�B �Le�7 ^ 'g� ^' a 1 , j' k � I � � ,F� f/ y� LL �� .. d r J'i� �� �,. � �[ /� �
'" � ./'"�.� ��F.' c _�I ...3 -..��. � 9 ' N �p. 'S �� .u•Y. .'�.I�' pN'3iS �11�'y �� � I �s,�i�.,..
' � . �a h � , ,� �� �� .' � � v � � � i�
. i A�. � �� f � y � I � . All � � . '�' 1i � r � . . �e.. 1 � I � �I ' ti ' ��.
, . �° s � � 1 ! � � :' { fi ` . , ���_� , � �� � k , ��� .
v I- J K �
a d �1. W A . �2 4'S i� '"`� If �' ���. a � �� �7 1 1 ��� aQd}f '7 y,"'�-'.v� A!/11N�]�- 7i Sb I J ��
, � i� � T� i� 2 I � t l 1 S, c. ` � �i i i �! c #�" .�.r QUO �
� �� ; �a f N I i i � ii ��� .� 1
�..m. �`(� : � x i � � � I N � : ��,y Ij � � � r � � � t � � � 4 , � { '�'yJ' ff j�ib �` �..
' l : � ., �+ �� N ��%'• +'1 '�" , � J�v' � ' ` r� ri .' � ^J n ; ilo � L �^ '�'� � �r :� i p ' � (�7.
� J ad �� 1 � 7�� .��,.,-J' �
. :: r. 't o p �
� .:� ,'- � ° .
♦ � ; �� � �, 1 � .� � n f � � r u�` �e 'ti ��a>o q,,,, :
..
� A ..::. y ....,.. iii I r a' i i � � � J i � " � " � � R y` �� I � 1l
i h
Y i � ��` 1 + �m' � i ii � � � � N'� � . !, � �
� J � i ` ` i � � n � P ` ., ,: J � .
� � �r � . ' � � �� i ') .. � i i ` x i r � _- ' � : � �� i i y ��.:a� I' a i i� i+. ,�'
f . > � � �� �� FSV/ � � �/ #' Jm nY � � yc '�.� '� I ' 1 4' �' C 9 � � r ,, � c � I+` ��'
'�� �,.: ^ , I 1 i �.� 11 a� Kue�<.0 :�� If d �.- i, � � � � �.. �.. �'� � � ;
� � 4}�.., T.,b �. t i r �!• � W �� ��ry. . y � 1 �j � 1 �
''�. �f 1M � �� � �� . � � 3.n ' 1��'ir �'x+.L r'1 �i.- � I� . i� i�` y� � � � -rJ.t+ 7( �. .� '4 i i
. ;'_ � 't'� � .. �< T '1 - � - i � > � x`'r-r � ; � h `7!'�.;, - � y, �1 ( 4 -- � � I i�y' NL � I. �� }
1�. \ !".. y . °� I r d ry9.' i � Yib Civ� t � x'. �.r I ? l� � I r i�uW[Ai 7S ..
��� �r ��.;t .n � } � . �, � A . � �' '� �ly I ..f; � � �� W J
I � I (( � tv�b t:� 4. m iai�ie� i; � �' - n' � d.�. j i -' is � �I� � k �.: �� � �� +� ..,
�N_9t i� , �4� � i � �� � I lr L n �x�"1 � �.c„��'. i.�I��i 1 �� � v r in
11I r� a � i � I i � ,y r �"' ,\ � F - • n An�j.
� � _ �,. + ,a , ! ��y ,. '( , � ,k , .
� + � 4 71 a Y e IM',d-yYt i �l '3 'Y���. 4N�Q � � �i 41 � 1� �' 9 { i
I� ��� fr ,� r J: ' s s' rt. r � 3 �7c. � t�t, '�
� Rw. �a , � I ��. �� b �� � i r � �'�,r � I< I �, R �i '� '„ � � '� � f. � �f '°'' .r
I �' �.1 .' �i��Li �+ I'� P i91}c � I �� i �r'�VHR .. ,.
� � �tTL'1 �t /G� i' I R � li;�� i� � I...y� II ;� :> �x �� i�. S '"...y� i i y � vnr'� ♦�'I .
a p q � i_
S ,_^\ V ��.I d �� a �5 {�'�"� nl�� �>eqrll�.r...5 . .. . .. i. t... ... � 1. ..i i.r
� . . l.G f � .. i ' "':' �` . ��•wl .1 '. d i .
.
• . , • , , � ; ..
� ' • �
I�
. : � � . ,. •, •
E
r
. ORDINANCE NO.
' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
• LYNWOOD AMENDING THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE TO
� SPECIFY CONDITIONS AND PROCEDURES FOR PERMITTING
RECYCLING FACILITIES IN THE CITY
' THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES HEREBY FIND,.
RESOLVE AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 25-7.B. of the Lynwood Municipal Code
is hereby,amended as follows:
"27. Recycling facilities using one or both of the
following: Reverse vending machines or small
collection facilities, pursuant to Section 25-8.1 '
herein." ,
�
Section 2. Section 25-2 of the Lynwood Municipal Code �
pertaining to definitions is hereby amended by adding the i
following terms and accompanying definitions:
"1. Recyclable Material. �
i
Recyclable material is reusable material including but �
not limited to metals, glass, plastic and paper, which i
are intended for reuse, remanufacture, or reconstitution -° I
for the purpose of using the altered form. Recyclable �
material does not include refuse or hazardous materials. i
Recyclable material may include used motor oil collected �
and transported in accordance with Section 25250.11 and
25143.2(b)(4) of the California Health and Safety Code.
"2. Recyclinq Facility. �
A recycling. facility is a center for the collection
, and/or processing of recyclable materials. A certified
recycling facility or certified processor means a �
recycling facility certified by the California Department
of Conservation as meeting the requirements of the
California Beverage Container Recycling and� Litter ;
. Reduction Act of 1986. A recycling facility does not
include storage containers or processing activity located j
on the premises of a residential, commerc�al, or
manufacturing use and used solely for the recycling of ;
material generated by that residential property, business
or manufacturer. Recycling facilities may include the
following:
"3: Collection Facility. �
A collection facility is a center for the acceptance
by donation, redemption, or purchase, of recyclable �
materials from the public. Collection facilities may
include the following:
"a. Reverse Vending Machine(s);
j
"b. Small collection facilities which occupy an area of i
not more than 500 square feet, and may include: '
"(1) A mobile unit;
� DISK 22:RECYCLE ,
�
1 ;
,. ,
. . � �
� "(2) Bulk reverse vending machines or a grouping of
reverse vending machines ocupying more than 50
square feet;
"(3) Kiosk type units which may include permanent
structures;
"(4) Unattended containers placed for the donation of
recyclable materials.
"c. Large collection facilities which may occupy an
area of more than 500 square feet and may include
permanent structures only within Section 25-11,
with Site Plan Review.
"4. Processing Facility.
A processing facility is a building or enclosed space
used for the collection and processing of recyclable
materials. Processing means the preparation of
material for efficient shipment, or to an end-user's
specifications, by such means as baling, briquetting,
compacting, flattening, grinding, crushing, mechanical
sorting, shredding, cleaning, and remanufacturing.
Processing facilities include the following:
"a. A light processing facility occupies an area of
under 4'S,000 square feet of gross collection,
processing and storage area and has up to an
average of two ('2) outbound truck shipments per ._
day. Light processing facilities are limited to
baling, briquetting, crushing, compacting, ,
' grinding, shredding and sorting of source-
separated recyclable materials and repairing of ;
reusable materials sufficient to qualifying as a �
certified processing facility. A light �
• processing facility shall not shred, compact, or '
bale ferrous metals other than food and beveraqe
containers. i
' "b. A heavy processing facility is any processing j
facility other than a light processing facility.
� I
"5. Reverse Vending Machine(s). ,
A reverse vending machine is an automated mechanical
device which accepts at least one or more types of
empty beverage containers including, but not limited to �
aluminum cans, glass and plastic bottles, and issues a
cash refund or a redeemable credit slip with a value
not less than the container's redemption value as �
determined by the state. A reverse vending machine may '
sort arid process containers mechanically provided that
the entire process is enclosed within the machine. In �
order to .accept and temporarily store all three �
container types in a proportion commensurate with their �
relative redemption rates, and to meet the requirements I
of certification as a recycling facility, multiple
grouping of reverse vendinq machines may be necessary. '
"A bulk reverse vending machine is a reverse vending ,
machine that is larger than 50 square feet; is designed ,
to accept more than one container at a time; and will ;
pay by weight instead of by container.
DISK 22:RECYCLE
2
,
, ,
,
� � � � �
"6. Mobile Recycling Unit
A mobile recycling unit means an automobile, truck,
trailer or van, licensed by the Department of Motor
Vehicles which is used for the collection of recyclable
materials, A mobile recycling unit also means the
bins, boxes or containers transported by trucks, vans,
or trailers, and used for the collection of recyclable
materials."
Section 3. Section 25-8.1a of the Lynwood Municipal .Code
is hereby amended as follows:
"Use
"Reverse Vending Machines and Small Collection Facilities
"A. Purpose
1. "The City hereby finds that the establishment
of recycling facilities, unless subject to the
procedures and conditions provided in this
Subsection, can adversely affect the surrounding
properties. �
2. "The City finds that the number of recycling i
facilities if not regulated, will have an adverse i
affect on the flow of traffic and will create
problems of ingress and egress detrimental to --
' surrounding properties and the general community. �
I
3. "The City further finds that the establishment of j
certified recycling facilities without regulation I
and control may be detrimental to public health, '
safety, and welfare in that the same could become �
unsightly, noise producing, and odorous; promote �
vandalism and littering; and generally impair or �
depreciate the benefits of occupancy., "It is the '
� purpose of this 5ubsection to specify regulations �
and eontrols to site recycling facilitiess,within
the City, in order to prevent the above and other �
harmful effects and to promote the �public �
convenience and welfare."
�
' "B. Permits Required �
"No person shall permit the placement, construction, or i
operation of any recycling facility without first obtaining
a permit pursuant to the provisions set forth in this '
Section. Recycling facilities may be permitted as set �
' forth in the following standards: ;
"1. No person shall place, construct or operate any
recycling facility without first obtaining a permit �
, pursuant to the provisions set forth in this section.
Planning" approval may be granted to allow not more
than three (3) reverse vending machine(s) and/or
small collection facility located in different sites j
. under the following conditions: ;
�
"a. The operator of each of the proposed facilities is
the same. �
i
DISK 22: RECYCLE �
I
i
' f
I
3 j
�
i
. �
. - � �
"b. The proposed facilities'are similar in nature,
� size and intensity of activity.
� "c. All of the applicable criteria and standards set
forth in Subsection C below are met for each of
the proposed facilities.
"C. Criteria and Standards for Reverse Vending Machines
and Small Collection Facilities
The following criteria and standards are established for
development of Reverse Vending Machines and Small Collection
facilities in the following numbered convenience zones (563,
, 639, 691, 692, 693, 694) which were developed and delineated
by the State of California Department of Conservation.
Other convenience zones may be established pursuant to the
same criteria used to establish the existing convenience
zones.
"1. Reverse Vending Machine(s)
"a. Shall be established in the existing convenience
zones in conjunction with a commercial use or
community service facility which is in compliance
with the zoning, building and fire codes of the
, city.
"b. Shall be located within 30 feet of the entrance to
. the commercial structure and shall not obstruct ...
pedestrian or vehicular circulation.
"c. Shall not occupy parking spaces required by the
primary or incidential uses.
"d. Shall occupy no more than 50 square feet of floor
space per installation including any protective
enclosure, and shall be no more than eight (8) feet
in height.
"e. Shall be constructed and maintained with durable
waterproof and rustproof material.
"f. Shall be clearly marked to identify the type of
material to be deposited, operating instructions,
and the identity and phone number of the operator
or responsible person to call if the machine is
inoperative.
"g. Shall have a sign area of a maximum of four (4)
square feet per machine, exclusive of operating
_ instructions.
"h. Shall be maintained in a clean, litter-free
condition on a daily basis.
"i. Operating hours shall be at least the operating
hours of the host use.
"j. Shall be illuminated to ensure comfortable and safe
operation if operating hours extend beyond dusk and
dawn.
"2. Small Collection Facilities
' "Small collection facilities may be sited in commercial
and industrial zones provided they comply with the
following conditions:
DISK 23:RECYCLE
4
�
, � �
"a. Shall be established in conjunction with an
existing commercial use or community service
facility which is in compliance with the zoning,
� building and fire codes of the city.
"b. Shall be no larger than 500 square feet and occupy
no more than five (5) parking spaces not including
space th'at will be periodically needed for removal
of materials or exchange of containers provided
that the spaces are not required to serve the
primary land use.
"c. Shall be set back at least ten (10) feet from any
. street line and shall not obstruct pedestrian or
vehicular.circulation or encroach into the required
landscaped areas.
, "d. Shall accept only glass, metals, plastic
containers. Used motor oil may be accepted with
permission of the local public health official
within the industrially zoned property only.
"e. Shall use no power-driven processing equipment
except for reverse vending machines.
"f. 5ha11 use .containers that are constructed and
maintained with durable waterproof and rust-proof
material. The units shall be covered when site is
not attended, secured from unauthorized entry or
removal of material, and shall be of a ccapacity -�
sufficient to accommodate materials colle�ted and
collection schedule. �
"g. Shall store all recyclable material in containers
or in the mobile unit vehicle, and shall not leave
materials outside of containers when attendant is
not present.
"h. Shall be maintained free of litter and any other
undesirable materials.
"i. Shall not exceed noise levels of 60 dBA as measured
at the property line of residentially zoned or
occupied property, otherwise shall not exceed 70
dBA.
"j. Attended facilities located within 100 feet of a
property zoned or occupied for residential use
shall operate only during the hours between 9:00
a.m. and 7:00 p.m..
"k. Containers for the 24-hour donation of materials
shall be at least 500 feet from any property zoned
or occupied for residential use, unless there is an
accoustical shielding between the containers and
, the residential use. Signs may be provided as
follows:
"(1) Containers shall be clearly marked to identify
the type of material which may be deposited;
the facility shall be clearly marked to
identify the name and telephone number of the
facility operator and the hours of operation,
and display a notice stating that no material
shall be left outside the recycling enclosure �
or containers; shall occupy no more than 16
square feet of area.
"(2) Signs must be consistent with the character of
the location. ;
DISK 23:RECYCLE i
i
5 �
i
� , ;,
i
. -. � �
"(3) Directional signs, bearing no advertising
message, may be installed with the approval of
the Director of Community Development if
necessary to facilitate traffic circulation, or
if the facility is not visable from the! public
right-of-way.
"1. Mobile recycling units shall have an area !clearly
marked to prohibit other vehicular parking during
hours when the mobile unit is scheduled� to be
present and shall be sited in such a way as not to
disrupt vehicular traffic. Mobile recycling units
shall have an attendant at the facility at all
times. The units shall be removed from the premises
at the end of each day and the area swept and
cleared of all debris at the end of the day.
"m. Occupation of parking spaces by the facility and by
the attendant may not reduce available parking
' spaces below the miniinum number required for the
primary host use.
"n. No additional parking spaces will be required for
customers of a small collection facility located at
' the established parking lot of a host use. One
space will be provided for the attendant, if
needed.
"D. Site Plan Review Committee Approval
All applications for permits for Reverse Vending Machines `
' and Small Collection Facilities shall be approved by the
Site Plan Review Committee.
"E. Expiration of Permits
In the event that a recycling center is vacated,
abandoned, or suspended, all structures, vehicles,
trailers, and/or units shall be removed from the premises
within a period of thirty (30) days following the vacation,
abandonment or suspension of said premises. Non-compliance
with this section may be abated as a public nuisance in
accordance with Chapter 21 of this code.
" 3. Large Collection Facilities (Pursuant to Section
25-11.3 tierein)."
Section 4: Section 25-9.2 of the Lynwood Municipal Code is
, hereby amended to read as follows:
"Use 1
"d. Recycling facilities using one or both of the following:
Reverse vending machines or small collection facilities,
� pursuant to 5ection 25-8.1 herein."
Section 5: Section 25-lOb of the Lynwood Municipal Code is �
hereby amended as follows:
"10. Recycling facilities using one or both of the following:
� Reverse vending machines or small collection facilities,
pursuant to Section 25-8.1 herein."
Section 6: Section 25-11.3 of the Lynwood Municipal Code is
hereby amended to read as follows:
"Uses Permitted Subiect to a Conditional Use Permit
"4. Large Collection Facilities and Processing Facilities,
provided the following standards are met:
DISK 23:RECYCLE
6
_ �
o_ � � �
"1. The facility does not abut a property zoned or
planned for residential use;
' "2. At least 150 feet from property zoned or planned for
residential use;
"3. The facility will be sceened from the public right-
of-way by opperating in an enclosed building or;
"a. Within an area enclosed by an opaque fence
at least six (6) feet in height with land-
scaping to the following standards:
"(1) A minimum of 5 feet fully landscaped
. area at the front of the site.
"(2) A driveway and pedestrian access shall
be the only paved areas within the 5
foot front landscaped area.
"4. Noise levels shall not exceed 60 dBA as measured at
the property line of residentially zoned property,
or otherwise shall not exceed 70 dBA.
"5. All setbacks except for the landscape requirement
of Subsection 3.a. should be those provided for in
the zoning ordinance for this district.
"6. All exterior storage of material shall be in sturdy
containers which are covered, secured, and -`
maintained in good condition or baled or
palletized. Storage containers for flammable
material shall be constructed on non=flamable
material. Oil storage must be in containers
approved by the Lynwood Fire Department
and the Los Angeles County Health Department. No
storage, excluding truck trailers and over-
seas' containers, will be visable above the
height of the fencing.
"7. The site shall be maintained free of litter and any
other undesirable materials, and will be cleaned of
� loose debris on a daily basis. The containers will
be clearly marked to identify the type of material
that may be deposited; the facility shall display a
notice stating that no material shall be left
outside the recycling containers.
"8. The facility will be clearly marked with the name
and phone number of the facility operator and the
hours of operation; identification and information
signs will meet the standards of the zone; and
directional signs, bearing no advertising message,
. may be installed with the approval of the Community
Development Director, if necessary, to facilitate
traffic circulation or if the facility is not
visible from the public right-of-way.
"9. Power-driven processing, including aluminum foil
and can compacting, baling, plastic shredding, or
other light processing activities necessary for
efficient temporary storage and shipment of
material, may be approved through a Conditional Use
Permit process.
"10. If the facility is located within 500 feet of �
property zoned, planned or occupied for residential
use, it shall not be in operation between 7:00 p.m.
and 7:00 a.m." I
DISK 22:RECYCLE �
y
7
J
I
: '. �. �
Section 6: Severability.
If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,
clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance, or the �
application thereof to any person or place, is for any
, reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court or competent jurisdiction, such �
. decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions of this ordinance or its application to, other
persons or places.
The' City Council hereby declares that it would have
adopted this ordinance, and each section, subsection,
subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion
thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or
� portions, or the application thereof to any person or
place, be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of
said City held on the day of
, 1987, and finally adopted and ordered
published at a meeting of said Council
held on the day of ,
1987, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
. I
PAUL R. RICHARDS II i
MAYOR i
I
ATTEST: �
ANDREA HOOPER I
CITY CLERK
,
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: '
i
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa . ,
Community Development Dept. General Counsel
DISK 23:RECYCLE �
�
8 ,
'� � � �
' ' 87091cup
,�. I ��EM N0. z
DATE: December 8 1987 '�' ' �' �� l � / �
' 1.+;'1 J C! V �. ._!L`U.�.I.._..,.,.�.,.,�
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 87091
APPLICANT: Pierre Maxwell
PROPOSAL:
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to open a
store to sell new and used items at 12039 Long Beach Blvd., in
the C-2A Medium Commercial zone. ;
FACTS: ��
1. Source of Authority. �
Section 25-10 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that
a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to operate any �
business selling used items.
2. Property Location. '
The subject property consists of a single lot on the North-
west corner of Cedar Avenue and Long Beach Blvd. ,(See i
attached Location Map.) �
3. Property Size. �
The subject property is approximatel fift �
y y (50') wide and
one hundred forty (140') feet deep; the total area is �
approximately 7,000 square feet.
I
4.' Existing Land Use.
The property is presently vacant. The surrounding land uses �
are as follows:
North - Commercial East - Commercial �
, South - Commercial West - Multi-Family
S. Land Use Description. ;
The General Plan designation for the subject property is
Commercial, and the zoning classification is C-2A (Medium i
Commercial). The surrounding land uses are as follows: I
i
i
V10: 87091CUP
�
�
�
• o
General Plan: Zoning:
North - Commercial North - C-2A
South - Commercial South - C-2A
- East - Commercial East - C-2A �
West - Multi-Family West - R-3-
Residential ,
6. Project Characteristics:
The applicant proposes to sell new and used items -- �
, clothing, accessories, lamps, bric-a-brac, etc., in an
existing building; the applicant proposes to use one-half of
the building.-- 1500 square feet of store space. There is
sufficient parking at the rear of the site for the_proposed
use. The parking area needs to be re-striped.
7. Site P1an Review
� At its regular meeting on November 19, 1987, the Site Plan
Review Committee approved the proposed project, subject, to'
the conditions and requirements stated in the attached
Resolution.
8. Zonin Enforcement Histor
�None of record.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
1.. Consistency_with General Plan
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing Zoning
classification.
2. Site Suitability
The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate-
the proposed development relative to structures, parking,
` walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development
features required by the Zoning Ordinance.
. Long Beach Boulevard is a major arterial and is well.suited
to carry the quantity of traffic the proposed development
wouTd generate.
3. Compatibility
The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of
commercial developments; therefore, the project will be
compatible with the surrounding land uses.
4. Compliance with Development Standards
The proposal meets the development standards required by the
Zoning Ordinance with respect to front, side, and rear yard
setbacks; distance between structures; lot coverage;
' building height; and density.
5. Conditions of Approval
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have
a negative effect on the values of the surrounding
properties or interfere with or endanger the public health,
, safety or welfare.
, _ :
� S
� 6. Benefits to Community
The proposed development will aid in upgrading the
commercial strip along Long Beach Blvd. and will act as a
catalyst in fostering other quality commercial developments.
The development will eliminate the potential problems associated
with vacant buildings.
7. Environmental Assessment
This development is categorically exempt from the provisions
•of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended (Section 15303,
Class 3).
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2155
1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No.
87091, will not have a significant effect on the
environment.
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 87091, subject
to the stated conditions and requirements.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
3. Resolution No. 2155
r
�
'
V10: 87091CUP
, • . i
• O
� LOCA TiO/V M.4�
5tt �htti iu
NE ��
� ,
i o t � p !DJ � s� � J 7 /'9J' p f ST �
� � v � s � a a" an v n eo U �s "E � ' n�� '�a �� ,a. Reer ��
C n O n � � K �➢D6 M�O p ��j �. �
ce� f� M n `ti h�' x ��, y ,•t � '^ i'18o „ �a� ��M M b b �o � o y . .
� a91 ^�i aei�o,^��°�y e�� � „ tso � ' � � IM ^n �8� �i . .vs.a�
p �� Mo
I �+b! ` � Q' &I 3 N < y 791 � . ' � ' O ° —L i � � od �ii ��` o �
� �, 0 6� W � z rs A 1 �� q i�aia �a ,\
hSim � � �,
Q � � , � y �� ${ Asoe ��? L � �/iP�/ $4/S � �o � s °'.ro� .
�° � °ib � n Q � �, `v 677� � � y V �, \ �y� \ .L � � /O,v ^� n,� I � � �
MI 'b � e� �\ (,��tV � i lY'a `� II Mh � ro ro� �e� �lifil iai3 ^� � v
.^� M / ro M � h �, e�e aa .s" �� � eo� ^� � � M s J� �°w o" � �T� isia M
'°" h � "' � �3 `"' ° i i R i a M �" � b b �p TR � �
Vi RC/N!A � '�i e so �' 2 �a� 679 �I8313• � sc ro 30 ' • . �� �
a $. o � . �� T .
J �� � � il ° �07 `�` eii so� AVF,yUf S��?S �� . .
. "��p ^ tJ p i o - r I ° � � �'d O i o � 2 \ � . .
�. � � , n � 's�r' ' °" ,o �o�� � o IIq�Oa q`� r7 �,�,� . � � •'d � .v�j ro �2 r .� iD � n
> S; e 1 � � y a„�� �. . Y. Y� G/J B� � � � I�j �. n � � B J
y :� j iii' 1 �,: � m� to� �'°^ 3 0 " 5 ' eov � a � e� n �� �' l �/qG/N/ `�' �b
yt I /o� � o h �n� ti o ' � . A
y � I '� � soa � �o���sr q� � "`bYo k � .,. , � • .
� a zs a�
n
\�� � .' ^ I � � 703 � y 119� 811 � �gBZ? � ���/9 V "� a° o � p � � 3 , a , 3/ 32
� 0
M � M ^� M �„�i) v ' ` o �70 � �� o DI2 ``�: ��Y 42i l �� w v � �� � � h m �i � j� 3.
�� M
so . � '7 9'� ^ �� . �ia �� � a t � � '� l � `' o � M rv� f�
' "�� '� n u � 107� g 11`+34tl uzi rv so , � nd �9 � � ,�
ACNES . .^, h M� a � 6 .h . �� J � 757�7J )^� �5 u ^�i �.
'� s �' M�.. 1 0 708 �9 ' � �- rss� , o �FNUE � � 7i �'. 69 "j �� h
..°^� o
o."� , • g 2p B� 1'7 � � 67
� � "� M� o � '° m i- ° o �Ao�,'��' � ,� � AC�yE-S
� � (h � ^J U o � i< 71 p 81 �' - c`, �h �., "
!i �1a "� �v � ro a� a o �� Pa � o � d ° � n �i M�' M .5 0^� � " • �
ro � I
. I � � �Pa � �` 121 �5 e `+ 1 v `'� � � � ,
3ri o M o �� � h� 11 � "�b
,� w.ia . , a ' � Y ��� 'N 1Y 82E y _sa �2Q�� � �B �D�90 B/� M M aa `
� �9 ^1 I ' / 9. � � o B2 �j �
�� 70 � � � � . i ' . � / 727 17° � lym � �ao]l�� �� B3 B4 BS
, �l � �d�^ ,J � JJrJY o dol g � � �� '
� N� "l ' J� I /'= r. v \ 0 �
° � o)I s �- � �a 2� � �
�o �M ,:�� ' � _>! � h � „ ° /doa � M � °� ��� izo + �
�� o o so „� l iy r � �� 725 17 o r , �H2➢ $, S I^� h w /23 � 1/ .
� .. . d o ' . �� I ��� 3� • v ° O
/ o /fL . 7 � i5o� so �� V � ^; l\ �� //9
\ �� ao rv> 7S6 0 � J:v .,.' o ' „�° t`i tM � ���e U7 �� •
� p � rztz � r o � l�o � . [ `l � �q "� /,
'� /'�� �o° ` a� ��o � ., g36 � � ,� � . CED �' .n � s � r
3 ^� o , o g� n �: � a ' a
� 6 1 DDD ��� J• � O � Ja ?� f rv o '.:' 7d1 x E71 CJS M l`� � J h �/'. � 1 J
l I � 1 ._ o \ \ � \I � t
O � � DDG DDl ��I �� b: 74 �j1 0 � 87B V 6�27 /� � l'? 1 ll �' ,.
� D �Q � � / �i�D� � ��I U ./29, /3p /�/ / M M a i �
� i e,. � I I : � 7d7 � 011 E79 y ^" .$• 32 /3J /34 � M
/ � ' 3 I W ^ /JS /3
� : /c tPi i �-�71 Su p10 � V �'{"'J M1 / 6
92bI' R/O I I �'�3�� n l'/�IaO O� .
Y��k ^ \I s y pb � I � 98 3/ ^ yii Q, �` t? F — - , r P,� . i6o
n '�l roI,
..sM I� � ,�'� � � W � r�� ��u o,, � I � � svo � - � y eoo � � n
� � � � I 5 N e 9 S $ r-1 y 'a11 �1 ,� BaJ � ..� � ��o �/6B /67 -
�h N \ e M1� DDI l, p 70 �'' � gp ' ? e �
" ' ."� '�i �I � a '3 � 99/7� u b n '��"'� r iQ � �� � j� 66 . .
/.�+�ili � �' •^� rh � � `�g � �� W �.� 4� ° v zci '^ AC b C'' i9j d� � �� y� �,'��' . � n
� � I � O � y � ' so � �.f 992�3 u. m $ M 'n , � V M '�Bfi.. \"<.� � /60
ra �,� �' ^b, . , . ,R � i , AGNO��q .o .r� ieS`�� �
ti w J' !�a �
. roi6 io� �;R� i ��a ~ a o ' �tisc ��x�i l� d B �s � � a S o. e MOi'9irio/ p i� \
� ipi � J T� I �' �� ,y 'O 3o t� �0 �jao 862 � � M' � l� ��, y , a etoi/
� v �.r . ro� ! � o I M �y ro r � B,rg M r> ,,I� � , � , '.
I M m t T 2� � 'Ot �� io15 Y a 67 5 � � Bs� Bs6 "' � �, �¢. �, �;
j �., .,, I 2 ., l9 ��! °^ 4 3 B56 q ro M �,
� . :I � 1026�?�I�k. o �/3�4 $ . I I �"1�48 BSM
l � m'�'{'° io� �� � ' ..r., . ioz�, . eo '�� y � ��
M1I �I � a I ' ,-I irs�..��. � St °� � c ,p I
.' � � . �i' � ,! io � � ��y ' 9. lo1a�71� �7 a 6 - � B7� B7� y I � � ,e
� '� rn M' ,�I /�� ���� �1029 '^ /2�6/� � ` �of'��' � ' M �"�'y� ^ B '
. . � 1 .A� M� M�` o �� d3� �� /d 3a 'M � � � 'M "d' �h � �J u� �
so ro ro��` ia�o H B URTOiy � . M . n�� � `n� .,
. . . . � S9/I � Y .C`J .hJ
AVEN�
�� ^ -
I �77
/ 2 D / � �„
�7 � /i� ��' �r c.r,. �'j-Cy-- .
�
� �
87091
RESOLUTION NO. 2155
_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR PIERRE MAXWELL TO SELL NEW AND USED
ITEMS AT 12039 LONG BEACH BOULEVARD, LYNWOOD, "
CALIFORNIA, IN THE C-2A [MEDIUM COMMERCIAL]
� ZONE.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, did
pursuant to law, conduct a public hearing with respect to the above
' subject; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
considered all pertinent testimony offered at the Public Hearing;
and
- WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has determined
that the project is ecempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
� Guidelines, as amended (Section 15303, Class 3).
Section 1. The Planning Commis5ion hereby finds and
determines as follows:
A. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and '
shape to accomodate said use: "
_ B.� There will be no adverse effect on abutting property or
�, improvements in the vicinity, as consideration has been
� qiven to adjacent properties in the surrounding area.
C. Granting of said permit will not be contrary to, or
adversely affect, the General Plan of the City, as the
�subject property is designated for commercial purposes.
' Section 2. The Planninq Commission of the City of Lynwood,
� approdes a Conditional Use Permit No. 87091, subject to the
following conditions: ,
, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT '
1, The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments.
2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statemenf
of Aoceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and
agrees to the conditions of the resolution within fifteen (15)
days from the date of approval of said resolufion by the
Planning Commission.
PLANNING DIVISION
3. A minimum of four (4) parking spaces shall be required. One
space shall be designed for the handicapped. The spaces sfiall
be clearly striped and concrete wheelstops installed.
4: All business identification signs shall be approved by the
Building and Planning Divisions prior to installation.
5. No mercfiandise shall be displayed for sale outside of the
building in the"public right-of-way. .
�.
6... ,A trash receptable shall be•installed.
7. Fifty-one (51�) percent of the total sales shall be from new
items.
DISK D-11: RES02155
. 1
� �
FIRE DEPARTMENT
8. Provide approved 2A type portable fire extinguisher.
9. Aisle spacing shall be in accordance with U.B.C.
requirements. '
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
10. Provide an irrevocable offer of dedication for a five (5)
foot wide strip of property along Cedar Avenue.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of December, 1987, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
• ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson ,
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Sarbosa
Community Development Dept. General Counsel
DISK D-11: RES02155
, 2
� . : _ _ � . � � ; � i j� . � , . � . , '� ' ' : � . .
. ., � . ' . . � � �. . � I I. . , . . , � . . . .
i . � � �,' � ' . i ' ,. ', . '. ' ,i . il , � .
:
. ' �' � ' �, i . . . . ' . . ' . �
. . . . . , I i I � . �, . . . . . .
. . . ' . ' : I . . � . . . . . .
. I � i i . . � � � . .I . . . .� � . I . � . ; , ,
� � . � I � � I � � �� i � '. . . . , , ' . ' . . �
. .� . "� . j '� '� .. , 'i . �,
, ,. . . , � I � I I .. '. , I j i I . . l' ,
;
, i � � � I �i � , i -i . �, i � , � i . �. . . , .
I I . � :, ; j . . , j , . .
' � ��. � ' l � � �1 , . : . � �� � � ' . . � "
� l i � ! ' , � ' , ' � i ' ! i . . � � � � , '� ; � .
� i i � . i I i � i ., � i I � . , � .
�
i ; . , � i . . . . .
I =� � � i - ! ! � I , I � � '� . ' I' . � i � i � ' . I -
I
� ��' � � I ,. � I ', ' `�. � �� � � �� '.� � ^ .� +� �
. , i � �. � }� �� . � � . . ..
� - � .
i Q �'
. .
. ', I I � 1 i . . �. . . . ... . .
� ,� 1,
'i�'� ��� � ���� ��������� ��� ��
� � , ' i ; '
� , . ; , i --t:�..7� S� �.y l�`� ; . ,
� , %..��
, � , i ;, � i , , ,
�
� � ' ; � ; ;
�1 ' ' �' � �.
,�
,, �
! ;
• ' ' ; ' , I � ,
,�. ' �
.
; I , .
, _( ; . .
�� � ; � . � �'` � `r' ° f ,� `%- � f ;
, � � ' ' . � � � . . .. . . . , �� � , .. , , i 1 " � f � � i: �.�t� � .
�� f _ , ',�j.�:'Yc�'d��,,..�..,�„
., v � � . f �� a �j .. �- � ?'
' � .,- :�-•: w`
. ;� �-�
i � �'1.
I � .1� r/ ` � i ,� ,
;�.
� ,v/ ��'�rJ��;�'(J � �`� 1 Q �� � �, � `
' ��T. � n ` 1;' �;" � .
� � � � / � � x i �� �
( v • ��-� � �!� /(�
. .�.�
� . fr' .� � a fil
1 � �'�,` � ( �
I i �-, "����, ��n s, y1 ! ,
� ��� �,�-?-4/ .
:�,, �! t'a �� �.. �
' �, . �
� ��,Q �-/�t-�+ �No7
_ .�.
• O 87098TPM
DATE: December 8, 1987 ���(;� j'��L iTEM N0 ✓
C%��,:;i� f`l��. �?09$ �
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director •
, Community Deve,lopment Dept.
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19342--CASE NO. 87098
, Applicant: Nathaniel Roberson
PROPOSAL:
The applicant is requesting Tentative Parcel Map approval for the
purpose of consolidating several parcels into one, in order to
build ten (10) apartment units at 4516 Arlington Avenue, Lynwood,
California. ;
FACTS• .
1. Source of Authority.
Section 25-18,, et seq., Subdivision Regulations of the
Lynwood Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act, '
Government Code Section 66410, et seq.
2. Property Location. �
The subject property is located on the south side of
Arlington Avenue between Atlantic and Gibson Avenues. (Refer '
to attached location map).
3. Property Size. !
The site area is approximately 19,000 square feet.
4. Existing Land Use. �
North - Single Family East - Single Family (Compton)
South - Single Family (Compton) West"- Commercial �
I
5. Land Use Designation.
The General Plan designation for the property is Multi- �,
�Family Residential; the zoning classification is R-3 j
(Multi-Family Residential). �
The surrounding land use designations are as follows: �
General Plan: Zonin : ;
c
North - Single Family R-1, C-2
South - Single Family (Compton) R-1, Compton
East - Single Family (Compton) R-1 I
West - Multi-Family/Commercial R-3, C-2 �
6. Site Plan Review.
The map was reviewed by the Site Plan Review Committee at '
its recjular meeting on November 19, 1987, and the Committee �
recommends Planning Commission approval subject to
conditions.
V10:87098TPM :
i
,
• s
7. Public Response
Staff has not recieved any comments with respect to this :
application.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS �
1. Environmental Assessment.
� The Community Development Department has determined that the
Tentative Parcel Map project is exempt from the provisions of
the State CEQA Guidlines, as amended (Section 150 61 (b)(3)).
2. Staff analysis of this proposed lot consolidation includes
the following findings: (a) Design of the proposed site; and
(b) Consistency of the proposed site with the General Plan.
Desian of the proposed site consolidation
a. . The design of the proposed lot consolidation shows the
consolidated lots to be in character with existing
residential developments in the area.
b. The proposed lot consolidation request consists of
four (4) lots; two are to be joined together for the
purpose of constructing ten (10) apartments, thereby I
allowing better utilization of residentially-zoned
vacant lots. .
c. The site is physically suitable for the type and "
proposed density of the development, in that the
. parcels are substantially flat and able to support the �
type of development proposed.
Consistencv of the site with the General Plan '
a. Staff's inspection shows the site to be compatible with
the City of Lynwood's General Plan that limits land
use activities to projects that enhance the function i
and quality of residential developments and that do not
significantly alter the character of the existing
environment.
b. The size and location of the proposed project does not
significantly change the character of the existing
environment. �
c. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the
objectives, policies, and land use specified in the
General Plan, in•that the General Plan designates this ,
area as Multiple Family Residential and the proposed
development is consistent with this designation.
RECOMMENDATION(S): .
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the !
Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2141: �
1'. Finding that Tentative Parcel Map No. 19342, Case No.
87098, is exempt from the provision of the State CEQA ,
Guidlines, as amended (Section 15061 (b)(3)).
2. Approving Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 87098, subject
to the stated conditions and requirements.
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Tentative Parcel Map
3. Resolution No. 2161
DISK V10:87098TPM
��c,�T�o� n��� •
. - j } � ✓ �11NL1 S). / ... . . .. . . � .. .. . . . � . .
� ' J ,
s
^ �. I h: v;� • � / � �d � .
g ,. .; t
e � . OIANDA ST.�
n
. � n Q ` y / � )}}��
'� ` O l] �� Q n0 � 0 I'�'
' . A 'C _.�, O � i
� °� . ' l O Y ^ :.' . [""i�ii�f_i° '"'�av I
, � o .,��� 8.. N f r __'._' i i' ;� I
; o N.oN � � O t:' -- _` � �z O n� OO p0 � �i� .
. �o i . . } . i i
y ,
, ,
e -Y Y .
� , Oa O �i.../ —_—_
' � ' =f�i + '� I � .
� ___ . un.
. � I i
........... � . . ��
� ,O • - � 4u0' � �RLINGTON . � �`R
,' .� ; � --+• .0 I ..e I .
W 4 • I �� ]6 4
i � f nr � ]I ,I I � � y � "
_ �� � � �i �'� � ,� �
' ' ."'a--, � I� _'1' o ;i.. - _ -`'>
� """ p ' � ss p O, . .
. . N i�� � t F ��. f J I 1 � ` O . .
y :� • �k <ae I^YIII II
�. 1 � r ]1_ :u�ul`L�M I
' � : � ii �� . 4 � .... + � i
� _ S- •� • pppp� �( k FOIPY l.1VC. YpOPVY�
,' b . Y . _ II t
00•� 00
� ' m ' �1 i •. l� w k vOi � �.. �3 i. r•�ee 4 ' aVw,� �` °i .
I z e ; : a ro� �. .. 3� c et � � .�o a o0
. '�'-- � .a..Qr a W � . �.w e r. .�a t, ' ee ) >. oa..� f
I. �a v.'➢ t 6�< ` Y y T�. 9�T � . 'Oef r ' O � C)ve f
, o O ' �is O � O �,-' , y _ a � m �i. ,o % ' � ` ,.. , � , ,e Z
�. . ,...,. ' �� . a 9 �os e � Q �� n c�ri N
� +�zo Q� y ' n tl 'r _ a U`�
. ,�,... g _ � �,. ,
'.foc• �� 145 {< ` � �t e T. ° . Qe> OT� �Qee '
. i 2i O; •' i .. ' b . ` +• ' .. . r5 '
^' 1'�i22Qj: . a�ee '_ a�„'A^' q.�r`Qoo — ._ , �0' - 4 c:�� E �_r. Si . 1 J�'-__
/1, rOe H� , f �� Il _
, �, �l_v i ^;. � °ti -�c ;�jxo EO, �. Z-)A91-S�; . ia _ _ �� �
� � O 14J i N_ iei d OZQ A• � F S ��
Ouf[NSDw�E i2q O �., r - • ".1 , __ _ ,n __- • `'� "Oi� c. �an
. 51 1 o�0"C b w r_ -' 0 ` 8 E Q ,` ` X - \
1250 :OS,GZL YS �u �.�LO� ` 4J `.O�S '.� ���y
' - n.i� �. O . v1_ �. '.
�
� �`' �Ory 141 S A , O26 . '��• �� \��� ' ` ��'
i 126 O — ' � �' •
(, 9'�
�0140 ` � v 2'v 4� V ...�::�'�. _' (����..�-
O _ �' F ���
. . 121 \. ° . Q$• I � ♦� . 50 �. �EJ
r y . ` .
- 09 • o O�0 ' v � � '�ti — ..I�b
O ^ ae '0' ' � �zo �� t, iQs� nea.,,` Y,,,_ , r
.� - . . • (.•.lue `, i r-��� ' "" ^,•. , s pe, 4 ,;' � . _ T _'r° "'�1 rill
I
.. I
. .. . ._. . . i
I
i
� I
_ _ n:
� •
;
87098TPM
RESOLUTION NO. 2161
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19342 TO
� COMBINE 2 LOTS INTO ONE PARCEL, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF
LOT 30 AND A PORTION OF LOT 31, TRACT NO. 7099, PER BOOK
� 101, PG. 687 OF MAPS RECORDED IN THE COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES, CITY OF LYNWOOD
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject
application; and I
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered
all pertinent testimony offered in the case as presented at the
public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the preparation, filing and recordation of a �
Parcel Map is required for the proposed residential development; I
and
Section 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find and I
determine that said Tentative Parcel Map No. 19342 should be �
� approved for the following reasons: i
A. The combination of lots meets all the applicable
requirements and conditions imposed by the State
Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations
of the Lynwood Municipal Code. I
B. The proposed combination of lots is consistent with �
„ the applicable elements of the General Plan and the �
Official Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lynwood. �
C: Proper and reasonable provisions have been made for I
adequate ingress and egress to the lot:s being �
combined. ,
D. Proper and adequate provisions have been made for all �
public utilities and public services, including I
sewers.
�
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood (
hereby .approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 19342 in the R-3 �
' (MUlti-Family Residential) zone, subject to the following I
conditions:
I
I
i
�
I
V10-87098TPM I
�
I
�
� �.
Community Development Department Conditions
1. ,The requirements of all other City Departments shall be met.
2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement
' of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands and
agrees to the condition of this resolution within fifteen
(15) days from the date of adoption of said resolution by
the Planning Commission.
Plannina Division Conditions
3.. Within twenty-four (24) months after approval or conditional
approval of Tentative Parcel Map, the subdivider sha11 file
with the City of Lynwood, a Final Parcel Map in substantial
,conformance with the Tentative Parcel Map as approved or
conditionally approved, and in conformance with the
Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations;of the
City of Lynwood. � I
However, no grading permit or building permit s�all be I
issued prior to recordation of the final map with the office I
of the Los Angeles County Recorder.
4. Prior to the expiration of the Tentative Parcel Map, the
subdivider may file an application with the Community
Development Department for Planning Commission action on an I
extension of the expiration period. -�
5. The Final Parcel Map shall be filed with the City Engineer i
of the City of Lynwood. i
I
Public Works Department Conditions I
6. All conditions of the State Map Act and the City's I
Subdivision Ordinance must be met prior to recordation. �
All matters and improvements shall be consistent with the �
ordinances, standards and procedures of the City's I
Development Standards, Engineering Procedures and Standards,
Water Standards, and Planting Standards of the Department of
Parks and Recreation. ,
I
The developer is responsible for checking with staff for '
clarification of these requirements.
7. 'Submit a Subdivision Guarantee to this office. �
All surveying for the proposed development will be done by
the developer, including the establishment of centerline.
� ties. Enclose with the final map the surveyor's closure
sheets. �
8. Developer sha11 pay all applicable development � fees I
including drainage, sewer, water and parkway trees prior to i
issuance of any building permits.
i
Pay Parcel Map checking fees prior to checking. �
Pay $100.00 monument checking fee prior to recordation. �
I
Deposit $50.00 with the City Engineer to guarantee receipt I
by City of recorded, reproducible mylar, parcel map prior to j
recordation. ` �
All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection I
fees are to be paid prior to recording the final map. I
I
DISK 22:87098 I
1 �
. . �
� � �
All requirements of the serving utilities to be met or
guaranteed prior to recording of the final map. '
9. Public Improvements:
The developer shall install all public improvements, as
required by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer prior
to issuance of any occupancy permits for this development.
Public improvements shall include, but not be limited to:
Removal of a section of the existing median and
� reconstruction of that section of McMillan Street,. paving,
curb and gutter, gutter spandrels, concrete drive
approaches, sidewalks, street lights, sanitary sewers, water
system, underground utility installations, traffic signs,
striping, tree wells, and street trees. All changes and
repairs in existinq curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street
pavement, curb drains, 'and other public improvements shall
be paid for by the developer. If improvements are to be
guaranteed, a faithful performace bond shall be posted by
the developer to guarantee installation of said public
improvements and an agreement for completion of improvements
with the City Council shall.be entered into. Submit Policy
of Insurance or bond protecting City against damage or
injury to persons or property growing out of, related to, or
resulting from improvements or work. The Director of Public
Works, City Engineer will determine amount and form. I
Deposit of Public works/City Engineer before commencing any
improvements, a sum estimated by the Director of Public I
Works/City Engineer to cover cost of inspection of all �`
improvements under his jurisdiction. �
I
10. Street Grades i
i
The street grades on all streets extending to the boundary i
of this development shall be projected through to the
nearest arterial street or existing secondary street in I
order to insure compatibility with the development of �
adjoining land. Unless otherwise approved by the Director �
of Public Works/City Engineer, minimum street grades shall i
be .25%. �
� �
I
Prepare street plans for McMillan Street, showinq the
removal of a section of the existing median, limits of
reconstruction will be determined by the Director of Public
Works/City Engineer. Plans must be signed by a Registered �
Civil Engineer and designed and drawn to the satisfaction of �
the Director of Public works/City Engineer.
11. Drainage: �
A drainage plan shall be submitted for the approval of the I
Director of Public works/City Engineer and the Director of I
Community Development. The drainage plan shall include the �
i
topography of all continguous properties and streets and
shall provide for the methods of drainage in accordance with j
� all applicable City standards. ;
I
The structural section of all parking areas shall be �
designed by a civil engineer based upon soils analysis �
supplied by a recognized and approved soils engineering i
firm. The structural section shall be approved by the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer. In the event that �
the design is not provided, the minimum structural section
that will be approved by the Director of Public Works/City '
Engineer would be 2 inches of asphalt on 4 inches of i
untreated rock base. �
Submit to this office a Geologic/Soils Report signed by a I
Registered Soils Engineer. I
DISK 22:87098
�
2 I
(
I
f
+ ' o
• •
12: Sewers
The development shall be provided with public sewers.
Design of all sanitary sewers shall be approved by the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer. Provide separate
sewer connection for each building.
13. Water Systems:
The developer shall construct a water system including water
services, fire hydrants and appurtenances through the
development as required by the Director of Public
Works/City Engineer. The developer shall submit a water
system plan to the City of Lynwood Fire Department for fire
hydrant locations. The City will install water meters only.
Payment for said meters shall be made to the City prior to I
issuance of building permits. The developer shall install I
on-site water facilities including stubs for water meters
and fire hydrants on interior and on boundary arterial �
streets.
All conditions of the Lynwood Fire Department must be met
prior to recordation. i
14. Sidewalks
Design, configuration and locations shall be subject to the
approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer and
the Director of Community Development. Ramps for physically -�
handicapped persons shall be provided both on-site and off-
site as required by State and local regulations. �
15. Traffic Control Devices �
The developer shall pay to the City the cost of installation
of any traffic control devices and street striping
necessitated as a result of this development. Replace faded
stop sign at northeast corner of McMillan Street and
Atlantic Avenue. Submit a striping plan for McMillan Street
to be approved by the Director of Public Works/City
, Engineer.
i
16. Dust Control and Pedestrian Safety: �
Prior to the issuance of demolition or grading permits, the
developer shall:
a. Submit a plan indicating safety methods to be provided
to maintain safe pedestrian ways around all areas of
construction. This may require proper and adequate I
signs, fences, barricades, or other approved control
devices as required by the Director of Public �
Works/City Engineer and the Director of Community �
' Development. �
17. City of Compton Review:
The City of Compton should review the parcel map due to the i
project area's proximity to the City of Compton. �
Section 3. The Community Development Department has �
determined that the proposed project is categorically exempt from
the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended.
I
Section 4. A Copy of this resolution shall be delivered to
the applicant.
DISK 22:87098. I
3 I
�
` I
•� � �
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of December, 1987, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
, APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa .v
Community Development Dept. General Counsel
` DISK 22:87098
.
,
�
i
_ �
�
I
,
I
` �
I
�
�
�
, 4 �
. I
i
-- � �
_ ____ _-- _ ......... _ . ._ ,. _ _
I
` " AF�LI GTON ` AVENUE
• W
� �,
. ,.� I[4:55, �.- �,, _ . ` _. ` . � _ .. . +-.
j ;� ' `
Q - I ,
_ / � � i ,
. _` . �
. . v .. �. p� '
�� { I � ' S7TE AG^4�351 L�Z 1 l2)?O .c'LAn?��.0 AYci
. , � . ( I � � _ LO' F y5�5 ,4AUNGiJJ AYE�
fcF�pfE . . , . .
'
� � 1 � r-, I Ov✓NER�� �Na?hqN�EL F . '. i
. . � - .. ... . _ _ _ � _d"-1�. '.�. � a �Q.D. BJX Ispi LYh'NOCC � � A �>g? �
_r� '
I 2
� i
. � � ' � I�; 'Wq7ER' �qFK N 7 C
I ._, .� . I.., . .}7`:� E wAC'-G N F •�����;�
.. ..__' t _.:_ .;.___.. _ . . . .
.. .-. ...., ' WNEY. C . 9a-Z2'__._ _.._.
.. i .....�_._ �— .` . . . �.
�>0 P � '
I I
�-u: .... .. . .. .. � . . . ,.
� �'�, — "_ O ' . F�-�G_.:D_'@7_' .: �
� � " � A.8 e IdA7JS1 - �
� ��OZ��qZ05 �' ENGIftEERIN �CI�SU.?G�.' '
5.'S' 1�26.6e,iZ.gg' _ % . 0 95 W =E.EN��.p -
. - � . - - . --_- � . C7,nLFC, � i
. � ... _. � .. . .F.: _- . � ., ,
� ,G
. _ � . � . 1ED51 Sdb ':<�7 ` .1
MC MILLAN AVENUE '
�- . �
i �
TENTATIVE PqREEL MAR N� l�34 '
I , ;
� BEIN6 !+ SVBD�V!SiON OF LOT b0 AfJD A POR �ON �,
OF �OT 31,7P,4�T NC.7099, PEq�PCOK 101 FG.6�87
. �F rA4PS RECORDED��N THE COUrliY OF l05 ANGEi!:_5 , �
' , "' , t'.iT 0� LYNWOGD .
� , .. t ,......_..,_...._ � ' - i
'�ii . . � . ' � Nev. 9 1997 � . ' . �
,�, .. , " . . . . . . � �.
�. '
.. . � _.=_.._-_—._'._._-____. _ ._.___..._.... _._ _._ .. ...._.. .. ._... _.. ._...... . _.. . . _. . __..._. _
._._...._ _...__ .. ..�
fi�—.'—__—.. . . ' '..
y �.. . - . . . , . . .
i.. I� .
...
3 ...,.__ . . � _ �._..1'" � .
. . ' . �. . . ' :. t. � � . : .
. . � . .. � k . . . . , .
. . � - . . '� .. . � ' � ,
. . .. , . . . . . � ' . {
, � � .} . � ' , . ;
� C ' /'1 4l 7
. . . . ' � , i . `� � U. �� '1 � '�
;;: _.. t:�
• •
• PRELIMINARY PLAN
FOR
AMENDMENT N0. 3
' TO
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT "A"
Prepared by
LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY �
11330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, California 90262
Charles G. Gomez, Executive Director
Consultant Assistance by
COMMUNITY DYNAMICS
207 S. Brea Boulevard
Brea, California 92621
November 3, 1987
I
i
I �
I
i
i
; ;
I ;
I
( � ;
, <,: '
� -
I
�
� �
�
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paae
1
I. Introduction
II. Description of the Boundaries of the Project Area 3
III. General Statement of Proposed Land Uses 3
IV. General Statement of Proposed Layout of 3
Principal Streets
V. General Statement of Proposed Population 3
VI. General Statement of the Proposed Building 4
Intensities
VII. General Statement of the Proposed Building 4
Standards
VIII. Attainment of the Purposes of the Law 5 -�
IX. Conformance to the General Plan of the City 10
X. General Impact of the Proposed Redevelopment
Project upon the Residents and the Surrounding 12
Neighborhood
�
I
�
� ` .... .
I
I
I
�
i
!
1
I
i +
, �
I .
.. � �
PRELIMINARY PLAN
FOR
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE
LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT "A"
I. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the Preliminary Plan is to provide general
direction to the Lynwood Redevelopment Agency in the
formulation and development of a Redevelopment Plan for
Amendment No. 3 to Redevelopment Project "A". This
Preliminary Plan will set the basic parameters and establish
guidelines to be followed in the preparation and
implementation of a Redevelopment Plan for the proposed
Amendment No. 3 to the Lynwood Redevelopment Project "A".
The preliminary goal of the Preliminary Plan is to create
the framework for enhancing the character of the community
through the revitalization of existing uses and the develop
ment of compatible uses. Although the redevelopment and
transition of some land uses are anticipated and necessary,
the basic land use character of the area will remain.
i
The Preliminary Plan proposes to upgrade the current
physical elements of properties and structures in the
project area which are presently under-utilized -or
improperly utilized due to blighted conditions. These
conditions include, but are not limited to, inadequate
infrastructure and public improvements, deterioration or
disuse due to irregular and inadequate lot layouts and
depths, insufficient public parking, traffic congestion, the
prevalence of depreciated values, impaired investments,
economic dislocation and maladjustment which cannot be
remedied.without redevelopment. Other negative influences
include unsafe or non-functional buildings due to aging,
defective construction, faulty spacing, overcrowding,
inadequate open space and mixed and shifting uses.
This plan outlines basic conditions hindering improvement
and deterring the City's commercial corridors from achieving
a quality equal to the quality residential neighborhoods
that lie adjacent to the proposed project area. It explores
ways to protect these established residential environments,
focuses on ways to revitalize the community's commercial
corridors in such a manner that will improve the City's
visual quality image and enhance the quality of life for the
local residents.
�
� 1
,.
i "
.
.
:;:
I r.:
.� . � �
d) Shows that the proposed Redevelopment Project con-
forms to the Lynwood General Plan.
e) Describes, generally, the impact of the proposed
project upon residents thereof and upon4the
surrounding neighborhoods.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PROJECT AREA
The boundaries of the proposed Amendment No. 3 to the
Lynwood Redevelopment Project "A" are illustrated in the map
attached hereto, labeled Exhibit "A". The legal description
of the proposed Project Area is attached hereto as Exhibit
��
IIZ. GENERAL STATEMENT OF PROPOSED LAND USE
The Land Use Element of the Lynwood General Plan presents
the City's objectives and policies on the location and
character of land uses necessary for orderly growth and
development. As a basis for the revitalization of the
Project Area in conformance with the City's Land Use
� Element, it is proposed that, in general, the following
' categories of land i:se can be permitted in the locations and
the extent set forth in the City's General Plan:
1. Commercial -°
2. Residential
3. Industrial
4. Public Uses
IV. GENERAL STATEMENT OF PROPOSED LAYOUT OF PRINCIPAL STREETS
As a basis for improving the Project Area, it is proposed
that, in general, the layout of principal streets and those
streets to be developed will conform to the Circulation
Element of the Lynwood General Plan. Existing streets
within the Project Area may be closed, vacated, widened or
otherwise modified, and additional streets may be created as
necessary for proper pedestrian and/or vehicle circulation.
V. GENERAL STATEMENT OF PROPOSED POPULATION
With the present General Plan land use designation of
primarily commercial for the Project Area, new residential
uses are not anticipated. Existing residential uses within
the proposed Project Area are anticipated to transition to
commercial use over time. ,
�,
3
;
fi
;
,.
J
�
I f '
)
�
.. �i)
• • 1
VI. GENERAL STATEMENT OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING INTENSITIES
The standards for building intensity shall be established in
accordance with those contained in the Zoning Ordinance and
General Plan of the City of Lynwood. As a basis for the
revitalization of the Project Area, it is proposed that, in
general, the building intensity will be guided by the City
General Plan Zoning Regulations, which have been established
to achieve the following objectives:
1. To enhance residential rehabilitation and maintenance
, within the City.
2. To provide appropriately located areas for office use,
retail stores, service establishments, and wholesale
business offering commodities and services required by
residents of the City and its surrounding market areas.
3. To encourage commercial, industrial, and related uses
to concentrate, for the convenience of the public and
for a more mutual beneficial relationship with each
other.
4. To minimize traffic congestion and to avoid overloading
of utilities by preventing construction of bUildings of
excessive size in relation to the amount of land around
them.
5. To promote high standards of site planning, architec
ture and landscaping design for office and general
commercial developments within the City of Lynwood.
6. To provide more opportunities for design flexibility
than otherwise occur under conventional commercial
zoning regulations.
7. To provide specific development standards needed for
the orderly transition of residential land uses within
the commercial General Plan Designation.
VII. GENERAL STATEMENT OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING STANDARDS�
It is proposed that the building standards should conform to
the building requirements of applicable State statutes, and
Los Angeles County and City of Lynwood codes and ordinances.
4
;
,
;
i
.. . • o
VIIZ. ATTAINMENT OF THE PURPOSES OF THE LAW
The proposed revitalization of the Amendment Area would
attain the purposes of the California Health & Safety Code
(Sections 33000 et. seq.)• The purpose of this section is
to provide a general description of the physical, social,
and economic conditions presently existing within the
proposed Foothill Boulevard Redevelopment Project.
Health & Safety Code Section 33030 acknowledges that in many
cities and counties there are areas which are either
physically, socially, or economically in need of assistance,
and as such require improvements in the interest of the
health, safety and general welfare of the peop�le of such
areas. These areas are characterized by one or �more of the
conditions set forth in Health & Safety Code Secttions 33031
and 33032, which cause a reduction of, or lack of, proper
utilization of the area to such an extent that it cannot ,
reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by
private enterprise acting alone. The law establishes two
(2) broad categories of these conditions, one citing a
declining physical environment which tends to diminish the
quality of life for neighborhood residents, and the second
describing a depressed economic environment resulting
largely from insufficient development efforts and inadequate
public improvements.
The physical environment is characterized by the existence
of buildings and structures, used or intended to be used for
living, commercial, or other purposes, or any combination of
such uses, which may be characterized by any one or a
combination of the following factors:
(a) Defective design and character of physical
'. construction.
{b) Faulty interior arrangement and exterior
spacing.
(c) High density of population and overcrowding.
(d) Inadequate provision for ventilation, light,
sanitation, open spaces, and recreational
facilities. ,
(e) Age, obsolescence, deterioration, dilapidation,
mixed character, or shifting of uses.
The economic environment is characterized by properties
displaying one or more of the following conditions:
i
5 l
.
-
-
I '
I ___
.. , � +
(a) The subdividing and sale of lots of irregular
form and shape and inadequate size for proper
usefulness and development.
(b) The layout out of lots in disregard of the
contours and other topography or physical
characteristics of the ground and surrounding
conditions.
(c) The existence of inadequate public improvements,
public facilities, open spaces, and utilities
which cannot be remedied by private or public
sectors without initiating revitalization
efforts.
(d) A prevalence of depreciated values, impaired
investments, and social and economic mal-
adjustment.
Generally, the Amendment Area is characterized by public
facilities which require substantial upgrading as a result
of an aging strip commercial corridors, industrial and
residential areas. These deficient facilities include
streets, lighting, gutters, storm drains, drainage lines,
water lines, and sewer lines. Some commercial areas are
currently served by narrow streets which have substandard
paving. The growing obsolescence of these existing pub]!ic
facilities has an adverse impact on the quality of life for
residents within the Project Area.
Portions of the Amendment Area are characterized by mixed
and incompatible land uses, which reflects a general lack of
cohesiveness and unity. In some areas, incompatible uses
are located adjacent to residential properties without
proper screening or landscaping to mitigate the negative
effects of such non-compatible land uses. There are a
number of properties scattered throughout the Project Area
which suffer from inadequate setbacks as a result of
unconventional lot splits. This occurrence has led to the
sale and development of properties which are of irregular
shape and insufficient size for a proper, functional
development.
Under-utilized properties and structures exhibiting deferred
maintenance are seen in portions of the Amendment Area. In
some cases, these instances of deferred maintenance may be
attributed to absentee landlords who are unable or unwilling
to devote adequate attention to their properties.
3
, 6 ;
,
i .
I
�
�
�
� "
�
,.4 . � �
Many of the properties within the Amendment Area are well
maintained and are only in need of improved public
infrastructure facilities; however, there are properties
scattered throughout the Amendment Area which clearly
exhibit signs of physical and economic decline. The
deferred maintenance evident in these properties constitutes
a threat to the welfare of the entire Amendment Area. The
rehabilitation and revitalization of these properties is
necessary to prevent damage to the character of the,,area as
a whole and to attain an optimal level of economic viability
for the Project Area.
Based upon field surveys, preliminary review of the current
. � demographic data, historical trends and discussions with
City officials, the proposed Amendment Area displays some of
the negative characteristics specified in the California
Health & Safety Code. While these characteristics greatly
vary within the Amendment Area in terms of the number of
actual occurrencea and the degree of severity, these
conditions as a whole may be summarized as follows:
1. Structures in need of rehabilitation;
2. Inadequate street, parking and pedestrian
conditions;
3. Inadequate water supply and disEribution
system;
4. Inadequate sewage disposal and distribution
system;
5. Flooding, inadequate drainage and lack of flood
control facilities;
6. Mixed and incompatible land uses;
7. Irregularly shaped and inadequately sized parcels;
8. Vacant and under-utilized parcels; and
- 9. Inadequate facilities for the support of public
services, including public protection and recrea
tion.
� .
;
;
i
y
�
i
{
�
i
I �
I �. ,
... � �
Benefits from the proposed Project will occur to the
existing and future inhabitants and property owners within
the Project Area in varying degrees depending upon the
existing characteristics and needs within the Amendment
Area. Residents and taxpayers throughout the City will also
benefit from the proposed revitalization of the Amendment
Area and contributions of the Area to the funding of needed
public facilities. These benefits would be obtained through
the following general activities:
1. Provide for the comprehensive planning, design,
replanning, development, reconstruction, or
rehabilitation of the Amendment Area in order to
facilitate a higher and better utilization of
properties within the Project Area and thereby
contribute to the public health, safety, and
welfare;
2. Stimulate construction activities and employment
opportunities throughout the Amendment Area;
3. Assist in the financing, construction and/or
reconstruction of curbs, gutters, sidewalks,
streets, flood control facilities, water distribu
tion systems, sewage distribution systems, and
other public facilities; and
4. Assist in the development of under-utilized
properties into viable and productive uses, and in
the financing of development throughout the
, Amendment Area in such a way that will make new
development economically feasible.
Specifically, the Redevelopment Project activities may
include, but will not be limited to, the actions outlined
below. The Lynwood Redevelopment Agency proposes to
eliminate and prevent the future occurrence of detrimental
conditions within the Amendment Area by the following
actions:
1. Installation, construction, reconstruction,
redesign, or reuse of streets, utilities, curbs,
gutters, lighting, sidewalks, and other public
improvements.
2. Modification of signalization at various intersec
tions within the Amendment Area and proper
lighting of said intersections.
I g
I
�
I
` ,
�
I
� ; v
I � _--
Y' i
. � �
3. Replacement, installation, and improvement of
water lines and facilities as necessary to
increase capabilities for providing adequate fire
flows and domestic water supplies.
4. Replacement, installation, and improvement of
domestic sewage distribution facilities and
treatment facilities to reduce public health and
safety hazards. �
5. Construction and/or reconstruction of various
flood control and drainage facilities.
6. Improvement and development of various utility
distribution systems including electrical, gas and
telephone.
7. Improvement and development of recreational and
community facilities, parks, and playgrounds.
8. Improvements to streetscapes, signing and urban
design.
9. In appropriate cases, rehabilitation of structures
including those of historical or architectural
significance. -°
10. In appropriate cases, the demolition or removal of
certain buildings and improvements.
11. Financing programs for the construction and
rehabilitation of commercial buildings and the
permanent mortgage financing of those buildings.
12. Disposition of property acquired for uses in
accordance with the Redevelopment Plan.
The above mentioned summary of major public improvements is
not complete in that other public improvement projects may
be proposed by the Agency. In addition, some projects/im
provements may be undertaken outside of the Amendment Area
boundaries that are of benefit to the Amendment Area.
a
9
�
I .
I `'
f
. � �
It is proposed that the Amended Project Redevelopment Plan
include a provision for the use of tax increments, in
accordance with Health & Safety Code Section 33670, as the
principal method of financing the proposed public improve
ments projects. Funds generated from tax increment financ
ing may be used for such purposes as Redevelopment Agency
staff expenses, office space lease, land 'acquisition,
developer incentives, and payment of the principal and
interest on any outstanding loans. The use of tax increment
financing would insure the availability of long funding
over the entire life of the proposed Project. Furthermore,
the upgrading nature of these public improvements would
result in higher rates of assessed valuation in the Amend-
ment Area, producing tax increment funds of increasingly
greater quantities.
In general, the proposed Redevelopment Project involves a
redistribution of funds. The proposed Project by itself
would not add any new taxes, nor increase the property taxes
of any homeowners within the Amendment Area, nor change any
existing zoning or building regulations.
IX. CONFORMANCE TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY
As prepared, the Preliminary Plan conforms to the provisions
of the Lynwood General Plan. The Preliminary Plan proposes
an identical pattern of land uses, roadways and publac
facilities within the Amendment Area as indicated by the
General Plan. All future Agency activities will be consis
tent with the City's adopted General Plan, which may be
summarized as follows:
1. The land uses identified in the Land Use Element
of the Lynwood General Plan within the Project
Area boundaries are the same land uses contained
in the Preliminary Plan.
2. The General Plan establishes principles which will
encourage better community design. The Prelimi
nary Plan proposes to make improvements to the
Project Area in order to eliminate the spread of
detrimental influences and ultimately create a
more cohesive community.
. ;
10
�
I
� �
3. The General Plan proposes a traffic circulation
system in and around the Amendment Area to provide
for the efficient and safe movement of people and
goods. The Preliminary plan proposes to improve
the circulation system within the Project Area in
, accordance with the standards provided in the
General Plan.
4. The General Plan establishes. policies to provide
for the housing needs of all segments of the
community. The Preliminary Plan proposes to
assist in implementing the General Plan goal of
providing decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable
housing for a11 residents within the Amendment
Area.
5. The General Plan provides for the funding of
required community services and facilities to
serve Amendment Area development. The Preliminary
Plan proposes to make improvements to these
services and facilities for the purpose of
enhancing the community, including the development
of recreational facilities and public open space,
and funding of on-site and off-site public
facilities.
6. The General Plan seeks to protect the community
from noise impacts that would jeopardize its
health and welfare. The Preliminary Plan supports"
this effort to protect residential� areas from
excessive noise and to minimize noise related
impacts generated by future improvements.
7. The General Plan establishes standards for both
the conservation and development of natural
resources. The Preliminary Plan proposes to
utilize these guidelines for all future improve
ment activities which wil'1 insure a balanced
approach to the preservation of aesttietic and
environmental resources while considering the
development needs of the area.
8. The General Plan provides for the protection of
the City's population from fire, flood, and
qeological hazards. The Preliminary Plan proposes
that all future improvement activities will seek
to promote a safe living environment that is
protected from environmental and man-made hazards.
11
'
I� ;
i
,�
, ;'
a
;;
:;':
' � �
X. GENERAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED PROJSCT UPON THE RESIDENTS
At1D THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS
The negative impacts of the Project upon residents adjacent
to the Project Area and surrounding neighborhoods will, in
general, be minimal. There may be short-term inconveniences
placed upon residents using the circulation system within
the Project Area due to the anticipated �public works
improvements which the Agency may undertake from time-to
time.
Positive impacts upon residents and the surrounding neigh-
borhoods will, in general, be in the areas of public
facilities and services, and environmental quality. The
long term positive impacts will include the preservation and
upgrading of the City's commercial activities and a better
quality of life for residents of Lynwood.
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
of 1970 (CEQA), as amended to date, an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) will be prepared to address the potential
environmental impacts of the proposed Project. The EIR will
also discuss possible mitigation measures which would reduce
these environmental impacts to a level of insignificance.
It is anticipated that direct Agency activities will occur
only when sufficient financial resources are available and
such action will produce effective and beneficial results;-L
therefore, the proposed Project is intended to be phased
with a limited scope of direct activity at any given time.
This subject will be discussed in depth by the Agency in the
"Report to the City Council" which will accompany the
proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area.
12
,
i
I
i
I '
� 1i
i' " ,
'i
; .... .
• A
EXHIBIT A
PROJECT AREA MAP
(TO BE INCLUDED) Y
� �
EXHIBIT B
PROJECT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION
MEETS AND BOUNDS
AMENDED
(TO BE INCLUDED)
�
�
I
I
I
�
i
I
I ` --
, . � �
PRELIMINARY PLAN
FOR
AMENDMENT NO. 3
TO
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT "A"
Prepared by
LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY y
11330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, California 90262
Charles G. Gomez, Executive Director
Consultant Assistance by
COMMUNITY DYNAMICS
207 S. Brea Boulevard
Brea, California 92621
November 3, 1987
�
�
I
� -
� ''
i
1 :%
�
I �
;
i
j , �., ;
I S
's^ ' � •
��� �it o �YNWOOD
PAUL H. RICHARDS, II, Mayor
° ` c� Ctty v1A¢¢ting CI�aQQenges EVELVN WELLS, Mayor Pio-Tem
� �" .
� ����* � Council Membeis
', rF 11330 BULL�S ROAD JOHN D. BYORK
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262 ROBERT HENNING
(213) 603-0220 E. L. MORRIS
� , . _ .�. . _.. ... . C�'
R _
CI OF LYNt^JOOD I
SPECIAL MEETING CITY CLERKS OFFICE
LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL DEC 07 1987
TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 9, 1987
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7�8e9�Ifl�lli12i1i2i3i4 6
5:00 P.M.
�
J �� �
PAUL H. RICHARDS II � ��� � 'i�" .
MAYOR
LOUIS HEINE E. L. MORRIS
MAYOR PROTEM COUNCILPERSON
ROBERT HENNING EVELYN WELLS
COUNCILPERSON COUNCILPERSON
CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY
CHARLES G. GOMEZ HENRY BARBOSA �
CITY TREASURER CITY CLERK �
MARY L. WRIGHT ANDREA L. HOOPER I
�
'
AGENDA '�
;
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL OF COUNCIL MEMBERS �
�
Louis Heine
Robert Henning �
E. L. Morris
Evelyn Wells �
Paul H. Richards II '
�
I
�
PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
(Regarding Agenda Items Only) !
�
• � � �
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING OF DECEMBER 9, 1987
SCHEDULED MATTER
3. GOVERNMENT RELATIONS SERVICES
Comments:
The firm of Aeron, Burchette, Ruckett & Rothwell has
approached the City regarding a possible federal grant of
over $400,000 for youth gang diversion. In addition, the firm
would provide government relations services to the City for a
fixed fee retainer.
Victoria C. Vernon, Government Relations Advisor, will make a �
short presentation on this proposal. 1
(
Recomendation: �
Council provide staff direction on this matter. !
�
PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATZONS I
�
I
I
i
ADJOURNMENT i
MOTION TO ADJOURN TO A REGULAR MEETING FOR DECEMBER 28, 1987 AT I
5:00 P.M.IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF TAE CITY HALL, 11330 BULLIS I
ROAD, CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA.
i
I
I
�
i
I
i
i
--- _ (
` ' � �
.
Heron, Burchette, Ruckert �Rothwell
s„s,� nso �.�,,�,�. To
77o L saeec n� wm sum sm�
Sacramento, CA 95814 ��^• TX �g�01
csizi av��
(916) 4461428 5 io" 70 °
. 1025 7limus leRasan Sum. N.W.
N*asAingim, D.C. 7D007
CdY11337-710p
. 7WX 71Pffi2-927p
December 3, 1987
I
Mr. Charles Gomez
City Manager
11330 Bullis Road �
Lynwood, CA 90262 i
Dear Mr. Gomez: �
i
Thank you for providing our firm with the opportunity
to submit a proposal for government relations services to the !
City of Lynwood. We believe the services we propose will
provide the City with a comprehensive governmentaT relations I
program which will have the ability to monitor as well as i
influence the development of state and federal public policy.
�
Heron, Burchette, Ruckert & Rothwell is a political
law firm with offices in Sacramento, California; Austin, Texas; �
and Washington, D.C. The firm utilizes the concept of
integrating our legislative, administrative, and legal I
expertise to effectively represent our client's interest. Our �
trade mark is a team approach. In this way, the cespective I
strengths of our professionals can effectively influence public I
policy actions on behalf of our clients.
Although established in Sacramento only three yeazs I
ago, the firm has grown to become one of the largest government �
celations firms in the state capital. The California office
employs eight legislative advocates with a wide range of �
experience and expertise in the governmental process developed
from almost 75 years of exposure to California politics. The '
efforts of our governmental relations staff are backed up by ;
our professional legal and support staff numbering twelve.
These professionals work as a team to assist our clients in �
obtaining an inside channel to the pablic policy decision
making process. Areas of expertise include the fields of
insurance, business, transportation, agriculture, health, law
enforcement, labor relations, housing finance, the state budget �
process, redevelopment, public works, toxics and workers'
compensation. '
The firm occupies approximately B square feet of j
office space located just two blocks from the State Capitol and
close to numerous state agencies, providing the firm's '
• ' � �
December 3, 1987
Page Two
professionals with excellent access to the Legislature and
surrounding state buildings. Our facilities include automated
technology such as Legi-Tech, Lexis, telecommunications
equipment and advanced word processing systems for all support
staff. Our cli?nts enjoy two conference rooms that can be used
for meeting and educational purposes, a cat=ring kitchen and
work room of sufficient size to handle large projects.
In summary, we believe our firm has the staff.
expertise, and facilities to represent the City of Lynwood in a
manner consistent with California cities competing for grants, '
budget resources and pilot projects. I have attached a
representative list of key persons in Sacramento with whom o�r �
firm has access. I have also attached a representative list of '
grants and awards that our firm has been instrumental in �
obtaining. Although our firm has not concentrated efforts in '
this area due to our client make-up, we have been active in a
number of projects that might be of interest.
Our firm is currently involved in representing the I
California Collider Commission on a project to bring the $4.4 �
billion Superconducting Super collider to this state. Part of
this project involves developing the state's financial package
which will involve the Legislative, State Treasurer and �
Governor approving up to $500 million in revenue bonds as part �
of the state's contribution to develop the site for this �
project. Senate Bill S1 and Assembly Bill 185, which authorize �
such bon�s, have each passed their respective houses and a �
final bill will be developed by a conference committee of both
houses before the Legislature adjourns for their summer recess. I
Our firm was instrumental in securing the development I
and passage of Proposition 44 (June, 1986 ballot). The
measure, authored by Assembly Member Jim Costa, authorized the �
sale of $150 million in general obligation bonds to finance �
water reclamation, conservation, and agricultural drainage �
water cleanup. The firm helped devise and lobby the �
authorizing legislation, as well as direct the statewide �
campaign efforts which resulted in its passage. ;
Other efforts of our firm on a nationwide basis in ;
obtaining grants and appropriations to benefit the activities �
of our clients have included: j
�
1) $15 million from General Services Association for .
University of Nevada, Reno, Mining School (new �
building). �
2) $2 million from Environmental Protection Agency
for University of Nevada, Las Vegas Environmental
Research Center (building addition). i
�
I
i
, I
I
I
�� . �
December 3, 1987
Page Three
3) $83,943,000 for the Central Utah Project (major
water system).
4) $2,150,000 from the National Oceanic Automospheric I
Administcation (NOAA) for the Desert Research I
Institute to conduct state weather modification
studies.
5) $460,000 from National Oceanic Automospheric for
the Desert Research Institute to operate the
Western Climate Center.
6) $300,000 from the Bureau of Reclamation to the
Desert Research Institute for weather modification �
studies. �
7) $300,000 from the National Oceanic and i
Automospheric Administration to the University of
Nevada, Las Vegas to conduct Immunological I
Research. I
f
8) $100,000 from the Fish and Wildlife Service to the
Desert Research Institute to conduct archeological I
research (pending).
9) $1,000,000 from the Stri �
pper Well Account to the I
City of Lynwood to construct a Multi-Purpose
Transit Center.
I
I hope this information is responsive to your needs in
further evaluating our firm's ability to represent the City of i
Lynwood. �
I look forward to meeting with you and discussing our ±
proposal further at that time. (
Sincerely, '
`_ l: ��1�1,�c'� �..� �.,/1�2�ruk/ '
VICTORIA C. VERNON I
Government Relations Advisor �
VCV:rs
I
I
I
�
�
I
I
i
. � � �
LETTER OF AGREEMENT
For a one year period, Heron, Burchette, Ruckert & j
Rothwell will provide government relations services at the !
County, State and Federal levels to the City of Lynwood for a !
fixed monthly retainer fee of five-thousand dollars ($5,000). �
Our firm maintains a completely automated billing system which i
tracks time and disbursements for each client on a monthly
basis. As a result, a track record will be available for i
budgeting purposes in subsequent contract years.
Direct costs incurred by the firm on behalf of the I
client; long distance telephone charges, postage, copying, �
travel requested by the client, parking and costs of obtaining �
Senate & Assembly bills, other publications and special �
material requested by t�e client will be billed separately. i
I
i
�
x �
I
i
1
�
�
i
'
,
,
I
i
j
I
�
. � � •
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction of the Firm/Individuals
A. Summary of Capabilities, Qualities, and Expertise
II. Recapitulation of Services
III. Report Format
IV. General Requirements I
1. Contract Fee
2. Insurance
• V. Appendix for Key Contact List I
I
i
I
I
I
�
�
�
' � � d.
I. INTRODUCTION
Representation of the City of Lynwood requires first,
an ability to recognize the scope and breadth of issues which
may have an impact on a public entity such as Lynwood. This
entails a sufficient working knowledge of a great number of
subject areas in order to identify potential areas of concern
contained in a proposed legislation, regulation, or other
activity of state government. Second, such representation
requires an in depth knowledge of the political process, as
well as personnel who have ongoing social and professional
relationships that provide access to decision makers in the
legislative and executive branches of government.
One of the truly strong points of Heron, Burchette,
Ruckert & Rothwell is the expertise of its professionals in
many of the areas of concern to the city. This expertise has
been developed by past and present represe'ntation of numerous
clients, associations. and entiEies, as well as experience
gained by our professionals in prior employment. .Without
attempting to recap the biogtaphical information contained in
this proposal, members of our firm have developed expertise in �
the areas of insurance, workers' compensation, industrial ,
relations, health care, transportation, finance, toxics, water, �
housing, environmental quality, the state budget process,
securing available grants and many others of relevance to.the
City of Lynwood.
Experience in representation of large emp,loyei �
associations, public entity representation for counties and I
libraries and staff work in the Legislature and state '
government, give our professional staff special insight into i
many of the subject matters related to the representation of
the City of Lynwood. The size and quality of our staff give us
the ability to cover the multitude of activities and hearings �
on'proposed legislation and regulations which often involve j
conflicting time schedules. This is especially relevant when i
such responsibilities involve a public entity with potential �
for legislation in clearly three quarters of the Legislature's �
standing committees, as well as the subject subcommittees. '
I
Tnere are several areas which we view as critical to
the City of Lynwood that are being addressed by the Legislature I
this session:
Fiscal Topics - The Governor and the legislative 1
leadership have placed the fiscal condition of the state at the I
top of the priority list. The effects of the Gann limitation
will continue to place additional pressure of the Legislature I
and the Governor in the next budget year. The increase in �
budgetary tension will exacerbate the desire to implement
"creative financing" which would result in a further negative
impact on cities. If, for example. the State were to adopt �
block apportionments to local government as a means of avoiding �
the Gann ceiling, it would then be incumbent upon the City of �
Lynwood to ensure that the methodology and assumptions are
�I
;
I
!
i
I
I
' � � �`,
just. It would be necessary to ensuze that any appropriations
to cities recognize the needs of urban centers, such as Lynwood.
Municipal Finance - Our firm was retained by the
coalition of bond houses, banks, and local governments to
maintain the tax ded�ctibility of municipal securities. We
fully appreciate the limitations placed on the traditional uses
of public interest bonds by the 1986 Tax Reform Act. The �
Legislature is considering conforming with the Act. The City ,
of Lynwood must act to ensure that the state does not move i
precipitously in this area, especially given the decline in I
federal assistance. Honsing, economic development, and public
works are key areas in which fully tax exempt bond financing �
can be effectively and legitimately used to meet the needs of a �
municipality's citizens. �
Law Enforcement - The need to retain funding for i
public safety needs is a must for all major cities. Of
particular importance is the need for additional funds to I
combat youth gang activity and truancy, drug trafficking, i
violent offenses, and counseling centers for innocent victims.
Effective representation ir. Washington and Sacramento '
is vital to additional funding for local government in these �
areas.
Public Services - Members of our firm have wide ,
experience in the areas of library services and funding; parks i
and recreation, transportation, health care, human relations, i
affirmative action, and economic development. The contraction �
of public dollars affects many of these services first. We are �
equipped to deal in each of these areas with expertise and
provide timely counsel to the City. �
The growing fiscal conservatism of California has '
resulted in a distinct threat to local government's ability to
adequately serve its citizens. Cities such as Lynwood will be �
significantly affected unless properly represented. �
The City, its leadership, and its citizens, must be
apprised of the changes being proposed and considerations by '
the Govecnor and the Legislature. It must be prepared to
gather an effective team to ensure that fundamental services �
and revenue streams are not adversely affected. Our proposal ,
to provide governmental relations services is intended to I
respond to this need and is structured to ensure successful
results. �
I
A. Summary of Capabilities, Qualities, and Expertise
Heron, Burchette, Ruckert & Rothwell concentrates on �
results. Our track record of effective representation is �
attributable to a wide range of expertise among our government �
relations advisors, an understanding of the legislative and
regulatory process, and a commitment to successfully represent
our client's interests. The firm's staff of government '
i
I
�
� ' � �
relations specialists work to educate decision-making officials
in the Administration and the California state Legislature on
issues of specific concern to the client.
The firm's legislative advocates provide almost a
half-a-century of experience and.expertise in government
relations services in California. during the 1965-86 Session,
Heron, Burchette, Ruckert & Rothwell's legislative efforts
ranged from monitoring legislation to sponsorship and passage I
of major legislation requested by our clients. The firm was
responsible for following approximately 400 Senate and Assembly
bills for a variety of interest each requiring varying levels �
of advocacy services. Due to the spectrum of issues, the I
firm's government relations personnel handled issues reviewed .,
by 35 of the Legislature's policy committees. Many of these
bills also required full lobbying efforts before the fiscal �
committees of each house, votes on the Assembly and Senate ,
floors and interaction with the Governor's Office and '
Administration officials in the various state agencies. Some
of our legislative achievements include: �
1. Insurance !
(a) Working on behalf of the California insurance I
agents and brokers, the firm drafted and passed legislation ;
stating the legislative intent behind statutes which support
the prohibition of unfait insurance rate discrimination �
contained in the California lnsurance Code. The passage of +
this measure required substantial lobbying efforts and personal
contacts with virtually every member of the Legislature, �
including the leadership of both houses, to overcome active, ;
thorough, and well orchestrated campaign of inedia and other I
interest group opposition. After educating the legislators on i
the merits, the bill was passed in both houses with vote totals
well in excess of the simple majorities required. Discussions j
with the Governor's political and legislative staff saved the �
i
measure from a potential veto and resulted in Governor
Deukmejian taking the most unusual step (for his
administration) of letting the bill become law without his
signature.
(b) As a representative of the insurance agents and
brokers of California, the firm supported legislation authored i
by Assembly Speaker Willie Brown which limited midterm policy I
cancellations by insurance companies as well as requiring '
substantial advance notice of the non-renewal of policies. i
Specifically, our negotiating efforts resulted in concessions ,
from the insurers which lengthened the advance notice �
requirements for both cancellation and non-renewal, the i
limiting of the acceptable bases for these activities by �
insurers and advance notice to the agent or broker as well as �
the insurance consumer, all to the benefit of the insurance i
consumers of California as well as their agents and brokers.
(c) The firm drafted and sponsored legislation on '
behalf of California insurance agents and brokers which �
I
I
I
. � � �
required that insurers give advance notice of the termination
of an agency contract. Additionally, the measure required
insurers to renew most policies, in the absence of another
available mark2t, for one year or one policy term. The passage
of the legislation will result in more stable insurance markets
for consumers and agents and was achieved through negotiations I
with insurers to remove some of their opposition as well as i
active lobbying of the members and staffs of the committees on
Senate Insurance, Claims and Corporations; Assembly Finance and
Insurance; Assembly Ways and Means and Senate Appropriations.
The end result was a bill which achieved an overwhelming vote
of approval in both houses of the Legislature and a �
Gubernatorial signature.
i
2. Transportation: , �
I
On behalf of its client, the firm gained a budget
augmentation of seven hundred thousand dollars ($700,000.00)
for increased personnel years to be utilized in connection with I
snow removal from major California highways after working with
key legislators and staff of the Departments of Finance and
Transportation. Identical appropriations were contained in �
both the Assembly and Senate versions of the budget after firm �
members extensively lobbied both of the appropriate monetary
subcommittees, thus removing the item from Conference Committee �
consideration. Undeterred by the Governor's blue penciling of
the appropriation, the firm obtained the introduction of an
urgency measure and passed it in both houses by the required
two-thirds vote. Upon reconsideration, the bill which I
contained the same monetary appropriation was signed into law
by the Governor.
i
3. Housing: �
The firm represented a major minority development firm �
in obtaining a contract agreement in the amount of $90 million �
for the construction of low income and affordable housing. In i
doing so we participated in the contract negotiations for these �
housing projects with the Department of Housing, the Federal
Highway Administr.ation and the California Business, '
Transportation and Housing Agency.
4. Health Care
The firm worked with the Department of Health Services
and dramatically modified the promulgation of regulations
affecting hemodialysis. Tne successful negotiations saved the I
client $14 million in calendar year 1986 alone.
5. Toxics +
Our firm led the effort on behalf of our client to �'
reform and extend'the state-imposed fees on hazardous waste �
facilities and generators. I
I
These are just some examples in the myriad of �
legislative accomplishments by Heron, Burchette, Ruckert 6 �
Rothwell.
i
�
�
I
I
� ' � �
II. RECAPITULATION OF SERVICES
A. Monitoring: Heron, Burchette, Ruckert 6 Rothwell
(HBRR) will monitor the legislative and administrative process
to ensure the City of Lynwood's ability to identify potential'
legislation and administrative actions affecting its
interests. This activity would be accomplished through the
review by o�r professionals of all bills and amendments thereto
for possible effect on the City. Proposed and adopted
regulations of interest to the City would be monitored by
review of reports prepared by the Office of Administrative Law
and receipt of proposed regulations through maintaining the
firm's name on the mailing lists of key departments, boards,
and commissions of interest to the City.
Regular contact will also be made with the legislators
and key staff of primary committees affecting the City. This
contact is essential in order to obtain early notice regarding
development of future legislation or situations that my give I
rise to the introductions of legislation affecting the City.
Through the establishment of a continued dialogue with i
legislators, our firm will keep policy makers aware of the
effect of specific legislation relative to the City of Lynwood. �
B. Bill Review: Heron, Burchette, Ruckert & Rothwell �
maintains a full subscription with he legislative bill room
and receives all copies of all versions of bills, resolutions,
files, journals, histories, etc. Copies of all bills and �
amendments that are determined to have any impact on the i
legislative interest of the City of Lynwood will be forwarded I
to the persons responsible for review, i
i
During the review process, issues of concern to the �
City of Lynwood would be identified and then forwarded to the ,
appropriate parties or specific department heads requesting '
review, establishment of a position, and specific action
necessary to conform the legislation or proposed regulation to
the policy of the City.
C. Regular Bill List: With regard to legislation, !
once positions are established by the City, such information �
and required actions will be entered into the computer bill
list and updated on a regular basis as required. The City's
Legislative Committee will be provided with a monthly summary
containing the number of the bill, a short summary of the bill,
a short summary of what the bill seeks to accomplish, the
City's position on the bills, the bill's status and the bill's �
next scheduled hearing. A breakdown of the City's bill list
and status report can be provided separately to specified �
department heads for theic review. Alternatively, monthly
reports will be tailored to meet the specific needs of the
City. Wcitten reports will be combined with regularly �
scheduled meetings with the Mayor, City Council, or personnel
of the Department of Intergovernmental Relations to discuss and
adopt policy positions on issues of importance to the City. i
� �
D. Legislative Advocacy: The City's position on all
legislation of intezest will be tcansmitted to legislators,
legislative staff, committee consultants, state agencies, and
other special interest groups. This will be accomplished
through: (1) letters notifying appropriate officials and
agencies of the Council's position; (2) personal disc�ssions
with legislators, their staff, and committee consultants; (3) I
meetings with state agencies and other special interest groups �
represented at the Capitol; (4) testifying before appropriate
policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature; (5) direct I
lobbying of legislators; (6) drafting of amendments; and (7) j
coordinating council members and city representatives for ;
testimony both in Sacramento and other legislative hearings ;
scheduled throughout the state. +
E. Coordination of Legislative Efforts: Heron, �
Burchette, Ruckert 5 Rothwell will assume responsibility for !
coordination of the City's legislative program. This includes �
the development of the City's legislative platform, proposed I
legislation, and proposed regulations and/or amendment thereto.
I
i
Prior to the beginnzng of each legislative session, �
our lead professionals will meet with and solicit input from �
the city council, major, city manager, city attorney, or i
specific department heads, where necessary, to gain a complete �
understanding of the issues of importance to the city for i
purpose of developing a legislative/government affairs �
program. Interaction with such individuals will continue
during the legislative session as the firm would intend to meet �
periodically with appropriate city officials to discuss and
review the status of legislation, budget matters, regulations,
and grants of interest to the City. Communication with City ;
officials would be further enhanced by written and oral �
communication where necessary to receive input or advise
officials of matters of interest to the City in a timely inanner. �
Coordination of legislative efforts also involves the �
responsibility for requesting and organizing appropriate ;
background material from offices of the City for legislative or
regulatory issues of importance. This function will also �
involve coordinating participation by council members or city �
technical staff in state hearings and meetings which would �
further the interests of the City.
Two additional elements are critical to coordinating �
the City's legislative program. First, Heron, Burchette, j
Ruckert & Rothwell will actively seek to cooperate with and ,
coordinate other potential allies on issues of common interest I
with particular emphasis on the League of California Cities, �
representatives of other cities, counties, special districts, �
business and labor. Second, the firm's professionals will
establish close working relationships with the City's state �
legislative representatives and their staffs so that they are �
constantly awace of the issues of interest to the City and the
strategies and activities intended to be employed to deal with �
these issues.
�
I
. - � �
F. Establish a Presence Heron, Burchette, Ruckert &
Rothwell will actively work to establish a strong identity and
presence at the State Capitol for the City. This effort will
be reinforced by day-to-day involvement in the political and
legislative process on behalf of the City. Our firm will serve �
as a resource to legislators, their staff, and the policy �
committees of both houses on matters pertaining to the
interests of the City with particular attention paid to fiscal
committees and budget matters. A full time office and support
staff make our firm easily accessible to all segments of
government seeking information and answers to inquiries I
relative to our client's interests. Presence, accessibility �
and an open channel of communication with legislators, staff �
and state officials allows for an educational process and
exchange of information in areas of concern to the group. ,
G. Annual Report: Heron, Burchette, Ruckert 6 I
Rothwell will, at the end of each legislative session, compile
an annual legislative report detailing the activities
undertaken on behalf of the group during the preceding year. I
This teport will review and analyze legislation of interest to
the City which passed both houses of the Legislature and which
will become law at the beginning of the next calendar year. In �
addition, the report will discuss legislation actively i
supported and opposed, the final status of these bills, general
steps taken in lobbying the legislation, and the political
analysis of behind-the-scenes legislative process regarding !
these bills. I
H. Grant Monies: Heron;.BUrchette, Ruckert & '
Rothwell will monitor the state and federal budgets for
available grant dollars for the City of Lynwood. When grants
are identified through such monitor.ing or by the various I
offices of the City, Heron, Burchette, Ruckert & Rothwell will I
assist in obtaining such grants on behalf of the City.
Activities will include personal contact with legislators to j
secure support, communication with appropriate agency �
executives and their staffs to ensure their understanding of '
all necessary matecials and information precedent to a decision i
or an award and additional activities necessary to assist in
obtaining such grants for the City. �
I. Speeches and Conferences: Heron, Burchette, i
Ruckert & Rothwell will attend and participate in appropriate
city, county, and state activities on behalf of the City of i
Lynwood where requested to make presentations and/or provide I
consultation regarding legislation on regulatory issues. �
I
9
'r
I
(
�
i
�
. ' � �
III. REPORT FORMAT
Heron, Burchette, Ruckert & Rothwell will develop a
monthly report on its legislative activities on behalf of the
City of Lynwood that will be tailored to the information and
decision making needs of the City. Written reports will be I
supplemented by periodic and regularly scheduled meetings with '
the city council, mayor, and other designated city personnel.
I
i
�
i
�
i
i
�
i
�
I
I
I
�
'
�
�
I
�
'
i
�
I
' ' � �
IV. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
l. CONTRACT FEE
Hecon, Burchette, Ruckert S Rothwell will provide
legislative advocacy services for a fixed retainer fee of five
thousand dollars ($5,000.00) per month for a one year period.
Invoices for advocacy services will be presented on a monthly
basis. The increasing cost of such items and frequency
required for effective representation is extremely difficult to
estimate. Our firm maintains a completely automated billinq ;
system which tracks time and disbursements for each client on a '
monthly basis. As a result, a track record will be available I
for budgeting purposes in subsequent contract years. �
Direct costs incurred by the firm for long distance
telephone charges, postage, copying, travel requested by the j
client, parking, and the cost of obtaining copies of Senate and �
Assembly bills, other publications, or special material �
requested by the client will be billed separately in addition �
to an agreed retainer of a lessor amount for professional i
services.
2. INSURANCE '
Heron, Burchette, Ruckert & Rothwell employs in excess �
of 150 persons in its three offices. The firm maintains I
workers' compensation insurance consistent with the law of each �
state or district in which it operates. The firm also �
maintains public liebility and property damage in an amount
sufficient to satisfy any requirements by the City of Lynwood. '
As a.major law firm, Heron, Burchette, Ruckert.& Rothwell also i
maintains professional errors and omissions liability insurance. i
(
�
�
�
;
I
I
I
��
�
i
i
�
. ' � � .
AP?ENDIX
' � � �
KEY OFFICIALS
CALIFOI2NIA S'PAiE LEGISLATURc
IdE;4)3GR5 AND STAFti
SEIaATE
Alf[ed Alquist - AA/KeitS Ume^�oto
Ru�en Ayala - AA/i�lichael Valles
Marian Bergeson - AA/Kevin Sloate
Robect IIev2rlf - AA/Josh Payne
U�niel i3oatwtiyi�t - AA/Barry IIco;taw
t4illiam Campbell - I�A/Jerry Haleva
Cecil Green - AA/Royce Saunr.iers
[�illiam Craven - AA/Srott Johnson
Ed �avis - AA/Hunt Bral/
Wadie Deddzh - AA/Helen Jones
Ralph Dills - AA/Polly Gardner
John Doolittle - AA/Ted ,3lanci�ard
Jim Ellis - AA/Elizabeth Dahl
John Garamendi - AA/t•lasako Dolan
i3i11 Greene - AA/Richard iiarris �
Leroy Greena - AA/Patricia Dlak2slee
Gary Hart - AA/Joe Caves
Barry Keene - AA/Terry Frost
Quinton Kopp - AA/Barbata Katz and Jack Davis
i3i11 Lockyer - i
Kenneth I•laddy - AA/JoAnn Siinkard '
Milton idarks - �
Dan McCorquodale - AA/Lee St�[tevant �
Henry �fello - AA/Sherri Yee !
J�sepn t - AA/Manuel Zamorano '
Reoecca ��forgan - AA/Jonathan Glidden
Jim Nielsen - AA/Jim Kjol - Staff Dir�r_tor/Jim Branha*n
Ivicholas Petris - AA/Cynthia Chavez
Rooert Presley - AA/Carla And?rson �
H.L. Ricnardson - Ci�ief of Staff/Michael Carrington �
Alan Robbins - AA/Sandy Aiiller
Dsvid Roberti - AA/F1e1 Assagai, Principle Cons./Simon Haines
Chief of Staff/Nancy Burt �
Steve Coony - AA/Janet Skata, Rick Dunne �
Don Rogers . - AA/Beverly Cail ;'
Herschel Rosenthal- AA/Colleen Seamish '
Ed Roy.ce - AA/Joan Sates
tde•�uton Russell - AA/Kay Lentz �
John Seymour - AA/Laurie Hansen ,
Art Torres - Bob Fredenbury
Rose Ann Vuich - Jim Collin i
niane Watson - Chief of Staff/Jim Lott
�
. �
i
I
i
�
, . � �
5ENATE COMt9IT'1'E�S
CALIFORNIA S'PA'l'H LEGISLA`CURi:
Agciculture and :7a1 Resourres
S?nior Consult,nt - Stephen 1�lacola
Approociations
Staff Diractor - Kar?n L'rencii
Banking and Commerce
Consultant - Terry Miller
Budget and Fiscal Revie:�
Staff Dicector - Steve L�rson
Hinority r^iscal Consultant - Lee Bennett
Budget and Fiscal Revie.a Subcommittee $2
Correction, Resources and Agriculture
Bob Podesta
' Business an3 Professions �i
Principle Consultant - Amiel Jaramillo �
Senior Consultant - Steve English i
Constitutional Amendments �
Consultant - Lou IIroml?y �
Energy and Public Utilities
Principle Consultant - Paul Fadelli ,
Housing and Urban Affairs �
Consultant - Krist Lane
i
Industrial Relations
Principle Consaltant - Casey Young ;
Insurance, Claims and Corporations Committee I
Consultants - Sheldon Davidow and Jim Cathcart �
Judiciary I
Princi�l� Consultant - Gregory Schmidt �
Counsel - Gene Wong �
Public Employment an� Retirement �
Consultant - David Felderstein !
Rules Committee
E;cecutive Officer - Cliff Berg I
Toxics and Public Safety �fanagement I
Consultant - Bob Fr2denburg �
Transnortation �
Consnitant - Mehdi Pforshed �
�
I
i
i
I
�
I
i
I
I
�
' � � �
SF.IdATE SELECT COFIMITTEE
�1?ritime Industry
Consultant - Joy a?ct
F+S S E;�iB LY
Att Angos - AA/Claude Everhart
Dorris Allen -
Rusty Areias - AA/!Curt Evans I
Charles Ba�ar - S=nior i r7alker �
William Baker -
Tom Bane - AA/Lynda Roper and Sue Charles �
Tom Bates - AA/Amy Strassburg I
Bill Bradley - �
Bruce Bronzan - AA/Hillary Ross �
Dennis Brown - AA/3i11 Bailey
Legislative Assistant/Chris Creech I
AssemUly Speaker �
i�illie L. Brown, JC.- Soecial Assistant to the Speakec/Phil Do��d ;
Press Secretary/Susan Jetton !
Michael Galizio - I
Mary McMillan - �
Charles Calderon - AA/Jim O'*fally
RoUert Campbell - Legislative Assistants/Pam O'Brien '
and Cindy I9illiams ;
Peter Chacon - Senior Consultant/Marc Sanchez �
Chris Chandler - ;
Steve Clute ' - ;
Gacy Condit - Chief of Staff/[dike Lynch
Lloyd Connelly - AA/Tim Howe ;
Legislative Assistant/Teresa Aieredith I
nominic Cortese - AA/Sally Hudson ;
Jim Costa - AA/Terry Reardon '
Bill Auplissea - Legislative Assistant/Jill Frechette i
Delaine Eastin - AA/Mary Jo Rossi
Jerry Eaves - AA/Debbie Beltran �
Dave Elder - Ctiief of Staff/Nathan Manske I
Sam Farr - Legislative Assistant/Toni Trigueiro
Gerald Felando - AA/Elise i�lazlum j
Gil Ferguson - AA/Cathy Pirie
Piilliam Filante - �
Richard Floyd - AA/Georgia Ring
Robert Frazee - Car�l t4acDOnne11 !
Terry Friedman - Legis).ative Aicle/Elsie Gee '
Nolan Frizelle - �
Wayne Grisham - �
Thomas Hannig�n - Annette Proini �
Bev Hansen - '
Elihu H3cris • - Chief of Staif/Valerie Lewis i
Trice Hacvey - i
Dan Hauser - Chief of Staff/Luke Hreit
Tom Hayden - Legislative Assistant/Ch'ristophN[ T9iley �
�
I
�
i
I
' � � �
Frank Hill - AA/Cindy Jud�, Leg. Aide/Jill La•�rence
Theresa Flughes - A�/Jos?ph Ife:� Len
Phillip Isenbecg - Special Assistant/Rich�rd Robinson
Ross Johnson - AA/Susan Swatt
Patcick Johnston - �.A/Peter Cooey
l3i11 Jones , - Vicki Glaser
Richard Katz - Chief of StaEE/Kathy F1eL•cher
David Kelley - Ciiief of StaEf/Nanry Lucchesi
Lucj Killea -
Johan Klehs - 13oab�ra Lloyd
Marian La Follette - AA/J�nnifer i,cDOnalA
i9illiam Lancaster - AA/Bill P7unes
Bill Leonard - Legislative Assistant/Joan Christensen
Tim Leslie -
John Lewis -
Richard Longsh�r2 - AA/Earlene Arnold
Tom I•SCClintocic - Assistants/David :�tiller and Tracy P1organ
Sui�ny Ffojonnier - AA/Shirley Schleber
Gwen t�oore - Legislative Assistants/Amy King and '
Tyrone Netters �
Richard ,tountjoy - �
Patrick Nolan - Ken Bell I
Jack O'Connell - AA/DOnna Y7etterer
Steve Peace - Chief of Staff/David Takashima I
Richard Polanco - Legislative Aide/Joey Fazio !
Charles Quackenbush - i
Mike Roos - AA/Rich FQilner ;
E[ic Seastrand - i
Byron Sher - Kim Lipper
Jackie Speier - Chief of Staff/Michael Thompson
Stan Stathan - AA/Patrick Piurphy i
Larry Stirling - Legislative Assistant/Ellie Bailey I
Sally Tanner -
Cuctis Tucker - AA/Tracy St. Julien
John Vasconcellos - i
Maxine ��7aters - Chief of Staff/Sandra Simpson
Norman rlaters - AA/Ron Lawton I
Catl�ie Wright� - Legislative Assistant/Jamie Khan �
Phil Wyman -
Paui Zeltner - AA/Carrie Iiarper
ASSEMBLY COMDfITTEES I
CALIFORNIA STATE LEGISLATURE
I
Agriculture
Consultant - ,tike Falasco
Economic Development and New Technologies �
Senior Consultant - Tim Masanz
Subcommittee o� Rural Economic Develupment
Consultant - Luke Breit �
Education
Cunsultant - Jim TutneL !
Electiun, Reapportiomnent 6 Constitutional Amendments
Consultant - Barbara Milman
I
' � � �
Finance and Insurartce
Consultant - 3i11 r,eorge
Subcommittee on Interstate Banking
Consultant - Rich Martinez
Subcommittee on �TOrkers' Compensation
Consultant - Billy Rutland
Governmental Effici?ncy an.3 ronsumer ProEection
Consultant - Idark Sektnan
Judiciary
Consultant - Rubin Lopez and Ray Leboy
Housing & Community Development
Consultant - Michael Krisman
Labor and Employment
Consultant - Jerry idcFetridge
Natural Resources
Consultant - Kip Lipper
Public Employees, Retirement and Social Security
Consultants - Dave Cox and Tom Branan �
Rules �
Chief Administration Officer - IIob Connellt �
i
Utilities and Commerce
Consultant - Robert Jacobson � �
i�ater, Parks and Wildlife ,
Consultant - Bob Reeb
�
S+lays and Dfeans �
Consultant - Sam Yockey ;
Subcommittee on Resources and Par!cs �
Consultant - Alan Lind'
Subcommittee on State Admi.nistration �
Consultant - Consie Ffi].le[ �
Subcommittee on Transpoctation '
Consultant - A. Lind
ASSEMBLY SELECT COM[4I'PTEES I
Aviation
Consultant - Chuck Wittig '
Genatic Diseases
Consultant - Sue Charles
Low Level NucleaC I4aste ,
Consultant - David Taicashima
j
�
I
_ - � �
GOVERNOZ'S OFFICE
Chief of Staff - Mike Frost
Special Assistant to Chief of Staff - Brian Lungren
Legislative Affairs Secretary - Vance Raye
Deputy Legislative Sectys -;•faureen Higgins and Allen Zaremberg
Press Secretary - Kevin Srett
Scheduling Secretac�+ - Suzanne Glad
CONSTI'PUTIO�]AL OFFICERS I I
STATE DEPARTMENTS I
Jack Parnell, Oirector - Department of Food and Agriculture
Jesse Huff, Director - Department of Finance
Ronald Rinaldi, Director - Industrial Relations j
I
John Geoghegan, Secretary - Business, Transportation and Housing '
Ken Kiz=r, Director - Health Services I
Chris Diemer, Director - Housing and Community Development I
Roxani Gillespie, Commissioner - Department of Insurance i
I
Howard Gould, Superintendent - State Banking Department '
I
Karney Hodge, Executfve DirectoC - Calif Housing Finance Agency �
Fred Noteware, Deputy Director �
Cliff Allenby; Agency Secretary - Health and Welfare Agency �
Tom [�arriner, Undersecretary I
Les Spahn, Assistant Director - Department of Transportation
I
Mike Nea1,.Assistant Secretary - Youtfi & Adult Correction Agency !
James Smith, Commissioner = California Highway Patrol �
Gordon Van Vleck, Agency Secretary - Resources Agency '
Tercy Eagan, Deputy Secretary '
�
Randall Ward, Director - Department of Conservation I
Joanne Sharpless, Chair�oman - Air Resources 3oard i
Peter Aontadelli, Acting Director - Department of Fish and Game I
►�il.liam Ivers, Director - Department of Psrks ancl Recreation �
j
�
�
�
I i
I
' � - � �
POLICE DEPARTMENT RESERVE FORCE PILOT DEDIONSTRATION PROJECT
SUMMARY �i
The xxxx Police Department proposes creating a xxxx �
person police Department Reserve Force (Reserve Force) over a �
xxxx year period for the purpose of providing the City with i
greater capability in addressing drug trafficking problems.
Specifically, the purposes of the Reserve Force would be to: �
I
1. create a trained force to respond to severe police '
emergencies; '
2. bridge the gap between the police and private I
citizens; and �
i
3, increase private interest and participation in law �
enforcement activities concerning drug trafficking �
problems. !
i
The City of xxxx currently employs Peace Officers. ;
While this force can handle the every day law enforcement
responsibilities, there are times when gang violence and drug ;
related crime demand additional resources. At such times, �
properly trained Reserve Force officers could be used to handle
routine functions, freeing up full time officers to respond to �
the emergencies. �
At the same time, Reserve Force officers could serve a
vital function as a liaison between the oolice and civilians.
Hostility between police and civilians can often erode the �
close working relationship needed to effectively fight crime. ;
Reserve Officers who are not full time police and who return to !
other jobs in the community could help reduce tensions and keep i
the open lines of communication.
As designed, the Reserve Force will also increase the
involvement of the private sector in law enforcement �
activities. Every officer on the force would naturally discuss �
his police activities with co-workers and neighbors. Private �
businesses will be asked to participate in the program �
financially, increasing awareness and interest. Finally, as
replacement officers are needed and trained, more people would �
become actively involved.
Law enforcement is most effective when it is supported '
by the community. The Reserve Force will draw new community
resources in the fight against infiltration of gangs, drug '
ttafficking and crime. At the same time, it will provide cost
effective resources for the xxxx City Police Department. �
I
�
f
. � �
PLAN OF OPERi4TION
The pact-time personnel would be integrated into a
vari�ety of Police Depactment functions such as the xxxx xxxx
. xxxx xxxx and xxxxx.
During the first year, xxxx Reserve Force personnel
would be integrated into the program, combining with the
existing xxxx Reserve Officers. During the second year, an
additional xxxxx would be incorporated into the Department.
The program would be implemented under the guidance of
' a full time xxxx City Police Department Sergeant, assisted by
two Police Officers. The plan involyes recruitment of
personnel from a variety of sources, (eg., Police Officers
, themselves, City of xxxx Personnel Department, Employment
Development Department, Colleges and Universities, and related
, community orqanizations).
The concept involves a combination of the policies and
procedures guiding most Reserve Officer Programs, (e.g.,
voluntary participation of these activities, while also
involving paid part time positions). The first 24 hours of
. such a period is voluntary in nature, but beyond that point, a
individual is compensated at a rate of $15 per hour. Each
Reserve Force member will either be a Level 1 or Level 2
Reserve Officer. This implies co;noletion of a Reserve
Officer's Academ� and a specific number of hours, and
authorization to handle general Law Enforcement duties alone or
with a regular Police Officer as a partner.
Doring the first program year, the organizational
, structure would include xxxx Reserve Force Commander, xxxx
Reserve Force Lieutenants, xxxx Reserve Force Sergeants, and
, xxxx R'eserve Force Officers in addition to the existing xxxx
Reserve Officers (totalling xxxx). This is in addition to the
xxxx full-time Police Officers responsible for managing the
program.
The Reserve Force Commander, Lieutenants, and ,
Sergeants would form the "Command Staff". This group would
handle direct day to day administrative operations. The '
Commander would have direct line supervisors over the xxxx
Reserve Lieutenants who would supervise the following areas: �
1. xxxx '�
� 2. xxxx
3. xxxx +
1
4, xzxx ;
i
i
5. xxxx �
.'
I
;
i
�
t
i
i
,
i
' � � �
Each of the Lieutenants would have 2 Sergeants
assigned to them for direct operational control of the
Officers. Concomitant with the "Command Staff" management
approach, the forth would have 24-hour coverage in the office
in the event of a major incident requiring mobilization of the
entire Force.
The program will also allot time and funding for
academy training, uniforms, concealed weapons, permits for all
Level 1 and Level 2 Officers, Commendation Certificates and
awards for exemplary job performance. The program provides the
Department with a cost effective operation and also
dramatically increases the capability of the Department by
approximately xxxx8. The number of regular Police Officers is
xxxx in 1987. The additional 100 Reserve Force Members (within
a two-year period) albeit part-time, will be of great
significance.
The primary function of the Reserve Force would be to II
act as a backup.for the Police Force, as well as an augmenting �I
force assisting Police officers with routine activities. If
any violent emergencies which are apart from routine ar_tivities �
provided by the Police Department occur, the Reserve Force �
would not provide assistance. Clearly those soecial situations ;
require the tenure and expertise of a fu11;� qualified Peace
Officer. I
I
�
IDENTIFIED PRIVATE/LOCAL PARTICIPATION IN I
THE DEMONSTRATION PILOT PROJECT
There are approximately xxxx licensed businesses �
located in the City of xxxx. These businesses range from xxxx
to xxxx. The private sector would support the Pilot j
Demonstration Project through xxxx. This financial support '
would account for xxxx8 of private sector participation in the i
Pilot Demonstration Project.
The curren't City operating budget for 1987/88 is $xxxx ,
of which $xxxx is budgeted for Police Services. The projected
total cost for the Reserve Force is $438,517. It is estimated ,
that between private sector and local pacticipation, ;
approximately 208 of the funding could be generated.
Therefore, federal assistance is requested in the amount of )
$438,517. i
EVALUATION
The program would be evaluated in a variety of ways. i
First, the Department will evaluate changes in such things as '
response time, reductions in crime rates and the ability of the i
Department to respond to more incoming calls and/or to resolve I
problems. Reports would be prepared on a quarterly basis and
the Department would be able to compare statistics with
previous periods prior to the creation of the Reserve Force. '
�
i
;
�
, . � �
„ .
� BUDGET
STAFFING
One (1) Sergeant Yearly •
(E-Step) Salary 552,848
Benefits 29,352
Total . 582,200
Two (�) Police Officers
(E-Step) Salary $37,116
Benefite 21,828
Total 58,944
x2 = motal 5117,888
Monthly - 350 hours at $15.00 per hour............$5,250
---. Yearly . . .. .... .............................563�000
senior PoliCe Clerk Yearl
(C-Step) Salar
• Benefits . . $1 6,096
Total $24,600
Staffing Total ..................................$287,66B
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE EXpENSES
Psychological Examinations .................. .525,000
(Bnsed on 150 exams in one year) ����
Medical £xaminations .............................$ 8,77S I
(Based on 150 exame in one year) ,
(9) Vehicles and Maintenance �
Computer and Printer Maintenance Contract........$ 1,000 I
Copier Maintenance Contzact........ ,,,, �
... .......5 1,500
Uniforms .............$600 per person.............$45,000
- (Based on 75 peraona) ;
T raining ............. ...
........ .................5 3,OSd
Personal Computer and Printer .................. .¢ 5,000 �
_._ ,
Yearly
Copier ...........................................$ 6,000
t2) Telephone MoQems .............................
$ 2, 200 �
Software Programa ................................$ 500 �
TOTALs $151�329 i
Staffing............
............................S287.686
Operatioas and Maintenance ......................$151,329 i
G12AND TOTAL .....................................$439�017 �
I �
i
' ' � �'
_ CONCLUSION
It is important to have a visible Police Force, one
which can be seen by young children, where Qolice officers can
be perceived as role models and where manpower is such that
officers have the time to visit parks, playgrounds, schools and
various social secvice organizations throughout the community.
ImpLementation of this Reserve Force will address the ever
growing problems associated with crime as well as the
tentacular hold of drugs in xxxx. The Reserve Fozce Pilot
Demonstration Project can serve as a role model for cities
throughout the nation facing ti�e same serious problems.
, � � � �
�
�
�
�
i
i
. . � - . � . . . �
, ' �
�
I
�
�
{
. i
� �
�
. �
_
!
�
. .. � ' . .. � . ' �
. . .. . . . . . ..
I
i�
I
�
I
. I
i
AGENDA ITEM N0.
CASE N0. �
DATE: December 3, 1987
TO: PLANNING COMMISSZON
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87097
Applicant: Teresita Valdez
Proposal
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit
to allow a convalescent hospital to provide geriatric,
primarily non-ambulatory 24-hour care to operate at 4271 Carlin
Avenue. The site was the location of a similar operation which
had been closed. The facility contains 105 beds ranging from
single occupancy rooms to 3 individuals in a room.
1. Facts
Source of Authoritv:
Section 25-4.2a, of the Lynwood Municipal Code which
identifies the type of permit required for residential uses
within the R-3 zoning district. The heading of community
care facility is a permitted use within the R-3 zoning
district with a Conditional Use Permit.
2. Property Location:
The site is located on the north side of Carlin between
Castlegate and Stoneacre Avenues.
3. Propertv Size:
The site is rectangular in shape and is approximately 38,634
square feet in size, generally 94' X 411' (.09 acres).
4. Existin� Land Uses:
The site is currently occupied by a building which had been
used as a convalescent hospital containing 105 beds, kitchen
facilities, as well as accessory uses generally found in
this type of facility. The site is surrounded by the
following land uses:
North: Residential
South: Residential
East: Residentisl
West: Residential
5. Land Use Descriptions:
North: Single family residential
South: Single family residential
East: Vacant
West: Multi-family apartments
6. Pro.iects Characteristics:
The applicant is proposing the re-opening of the former
convalescent hospital known as Hilton Convalescent home.
The facility has an occupancy of 105 beds for non-ambulatory
as well as ambulatory patients, and would provide 24-hour
DISK 22:87097CUP
,
skilled nursing care. According to the Los Angeles County
Community Health Facilities Regional Inspector, the
'�' convalescent hospital would require certain basic care to be
provided, which is regulated by both Los Angeles County and
the State of California.
From a zoning standpoint the site is consistent with the
permitted uses in an R-3 zoning district, as far as
building configuration. However, it does not meet the
minimum requirements for landscaping and parking spaces
required.
It is estimated that 25 employees would be accessing the
site at the day shift, which is the 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
shift. The site is able to accommodate twenty (20) parking
spaces, which is not adequate parking for the employees.
The deficiency in the numbers of parking spaces available
and the number of parking spaces necessary indicates a large
number of employees would be required to park off-site,
thereby creating an impact to Carlin Avenue in terms of on-
street parking. Additionally, visitor parking must be
factored into the calculation for parking. The code
requirement for convalescent hospitals is one (1) space
per five (5) beds. Using that calculation the site requires
21 parking spaces to serve the 105 bed facility.
Consideration must be given to the appropriateness of
permitting the facility to re-open with an inadequate number
of employee parking spaces exacerbated by the number of
potential visitors on a daily basis.
7. Site Plan Review
At its regular meeting on December 17, 1987, the Site Plan
Review Committee approved the proposed project, subject to
the findings stated in the attached Resolution.
8.. Zoning Enforcement History:
1969 - A Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of
the convelescent hospital for a 100 bed facility.
1975 - Conditional Use Permit issued to permit the
convalescent hospital to change uses to a commercial
home for convalescents and state/county retirees.
1978 - Revocation of the Conditional Use Permit to conduct
the facility as a commercial home for convalescenta
and State/County retirees.
1979 - Revocation of the Conditional Use Permit for the
operation of the residential care facility for the
elderly.
Analssis and Conclusion
1. Inconsistency with the General Plan
The proposed land use is consistent with the zoning
designation of R-3, provided the Conditional Use Permit is
issued. However, the General Plan designates the site for
Townhouse and Cluster Housing which generally is more
consistent with the R-2 zoning district. Therefore,
consideration should be given for the potentielity of a
General Plan Amendment for the area between Cookacre and
Thorson Avenues.
DISK 22:87097CUP
I
, �
„.
2. Site Suitability
The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate a
facility of this type; however, its inability to provide an
adequate number of parking spaces for both employees and
visitors makes the size of the convalescent hospital in-
appropriate as to the number of beds provided. The
potential trips generated by both employees and visitors
at peak a.m. and p.m. hours would be approximately 35
trips generated by the facility which, by themselves, is not
anticipated to create an impact on the adjacent streets in
terms of traffic movements. It should be pointed out,
however, that the combination of employees and visitors
would contribute to the off-street parking impacts caused by
insufficient parking on-site to accommodate the employees
and visitors.
3. Compatibility
The compatibility of the land use to the surrounding area is
appx•opriate provided that the site accomodates the necessary
parking spaces required to minimize the on-street parking
impacts. In addition, the inconsistency between the General
Plan and zoning creates an incompatability of the
potential use and the city's General Plan for a less dense
land use.
4. Comnliance with Development Standards
Specific Findings
a. The proposed conditional use would adversely affect
the General Plan since the zoning and land use
designation are not consistent. To allow the
convalescent facility to operate wo�ld necessitate
the initiation of a General Plan Amendment.
b. That the proposed location of the conditional use is
in accord with the objectives of this chapter and
the purpose of the zone in which the site is
located, since the operation of convalescent
facilites are a permitted use within the R-3 zoning
district with a Conditional Use Permit.
c. That the proposed location of the conditional use
and the conditions under which it would be operated
or maintained would not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious i
to properties or improvements in the vicinity, since
the site cannot adequately accommodate the reqUired
number of parking spaces for the size of the �i
facility provided the number of beds does not exceed
90. �
d. That the proposed conditional use would comply with
each of the applicable provisions of this chapter, i
except for approved variances. (Ord. No. 1107.)
If the project is approved for a maximum of 90 beds, i
it would then accommodate the existing, number of ,
parking spaces, thereby eliminating the necessity of I
on-street parking for employees and visitors.
5. Conditions of Approval !
Conditions of approval would be subject to the applicant
i
providing the following: '
DISK 22:87097CUP �
I
�
1. Reduce the number of beds at the facility to 90
beds.
i
2. Provide a landscaping plan for the entire site
including the parking lot.
3. The Planning Commission initiate a General Plan
Amendment to redesignate the area between Thorson
and Cookacre Avenues from Townhouse and Cl�ster
Housing to Multi-Family Residential, in order to
provide consistency with the current land use
patterns, zoning and the General Plan.
Environmental Assessment
The development has recieved a negative declaration pursuant to
the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended.
Recommendation
Staff respectfUlly requests that after consideration the Planning
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2158.
a. Finding that re-opening the facility would not have a
significant effect on the environment, and certify the
Negative Declaration as adeqUate.
b. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 87097, subject to
stated conditions and requirements.
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Plans
3. Resolution No. 2158
DISK 22:87097CUP
I i
i
'
I
87097
RESOLUTION NO. 2158
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSZON OF TAE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR TO OPERATE A CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL
FACILITY FOR THE ELDERLY AT 4271 CARLIN AVENUE
IN AN R-3 ZONE.
WHEREAS, the City of Lynwood has received an application
for a Conditional Use Permit from Teresita Valdez to operate a
convalescent hoapital facility for the elderly at 4271 Carlin
Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
after giving notice thereof as required by law, has held and
conducted a public hearing concerning said application and,
WHEREAS, the applicant has right of automatic appeal
before the City Council of the City of Lynwood; and
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines as follows:
A. The proposed location of the Conditional ,
Use is in accord with the objectives
of Lynwood Zoning Ordinance and the `
purpose of the zone in which the site is
located, in that the proposed use has not
been determined to be an impact to the City
of Lynwood.
B. The facility will not adversely impact the
residential character of the neighborhood.
C. The use as proposed by the applicant is
consistent with surrounding land uses.
D. The proposed location of the Conditional
Use and the condition under which it would
be operated or maintained will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety,
or welfare, or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity.
E. The zoning is not consistent with the
General Plan land use designation, thereby
necessitating the initiation of a General
Plan Amendment to permit the use of a
Convalescent hospital.
F. On the basis of the evidence presented to it,
the Planning Commission makes the
affirmative findings required by the
Lynwood Zoning Ordinance in order to grant
the subject Conditional Use Permit pursuant
to the initiation of a General Plan
Amendment.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of
the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and
determinations hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 87097 ��
provided the following conditions are observed and complied with i
at all times:
i
DISK D-11:RES02158
I
I
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
� 1. The requirements of all other City Departments shall be met.
� 2. The applicant, or his/her representative, shall sign a
Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, under-
- stands and agrees to the conditions within fifteen (15) days
from the date of approval by the Site Plan Review Committee.
PLANNING DIVISION
� 3. Provide four (4) additional parking spaces off-street method
of a covenant or;
4. Reduce the total number of beds to 90.
5. Provide a trash enclosure to City standards.
6. An inspeotion by the State Fire Marshall will be necessary
prior to issuance of a Conditional Use Permit.
7. Expert technical assistance is necessary to determine a
solution ;to building and fire code deficiencies.
PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
S. Reconstruct easterly wing of the westerly driveway to
. include sidewalk section.
9. Clear oUt basins and curb drain.pipes.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
l0. Obtain Fire Safety Inspection Request from the Department of
Social Services.
, 11. Other requirements from this department shall be determined
' by field inspections.
DISK D-11:RES02158
S
Section 3. The Community Development Department has
determined that the project as proposed could not significantly
• impact the environment; a Negative Declaration has been
prepared.
Section 4. A copy of this resolution shall be
delivered to the applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of January, 1988, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
Community Development Dept. General Counsel
DISK D-11:RES02158
.
' LOCATi011d M.4�
��
�
—��
,�
,
�.;; � _. ,� �> �
S£.E �SH£ET l3 ' `� �'� �
� , , -
��� ��� � � � �� �
, ,� . Lf�.U�!j; :�'' AVENUE '
� . ... .�� ... ... ..�
. �.
t ° _ . . e � �., ,. �. , , , _ �, �: �� � e N :
! . i ' ' : " ' ' .
= f: , a n L C '4 ' I. r�f
9yVDi • 786DS Q af{5i/ �y,�.53 S�53SI�950 • Ndl� o �' �k753/ �71317a71 � � • H�Idi7/f • � �'
�' .�..� Q�v�.:.. .. �' C Q n L Q•
j . . _ . . ; t . ' . . . . . ' . . rt; = �
y , �, .,, ,. ,. ,. ,m „ .. , ,. c O. •' W I
—At�-� 4 �li " - =��b- 4 a3 � - �SG = �7 __e5 'm 34__' °/, _77 ; ''el?o_'_� ° Z .
� ,
: .
� n . . . � .i... � �. : �� . . , �+
.. _ar •...
C
� ile�e • - �tev � � .loi♦ k ":. ' .�.- d
�
� �_______ ______
� .�.•
�
� �
• no�e . �ev ; p : I
".q�r _' _ - '__73_" _ .41'_" _'S7'__ II . � 37 '_ I[_' _"7/___; „ , Q �
..�qIMB .u57��� � ...74 � L/ � , 3 0 _ _�3':� �do __I5-' ' ~ __'77'_ � � . I
'°Nn �_ O¢ '_71 - ' , _'bo � J i1 — - r � 7a � 1� °1 '; / 73.- -a '^� ',, �
•�, '/Ni( IiI ��` ' /.I h ff�� ity y Nlt � �S �4 � `f�� .11 `!. � >i C
w . �.�{ 1. '. '.� � .
i , AVENUE
n.: vr ri. � i• ur � �. s� �� so ao 99m �'' esu .u.� ro n ��.
'ia l �l �o io „i �� g . _ . ' 77 - / v '. r I J
:i� I.i i i � �i'�� i e �o b 79 76 � wi i °j i _
,;� . �� I. i i i h �w. ?6 a 7" o �I ���o �_�� i_ i,a___
� i I I � Cj � noI � ua ^ � o v~ I �. rl � a
�n.N III � `� 1' I` �SO 30 „ k Z ,,(�� � �. �
h.• � ov � rf�•I �.1 i � w Su � ��eu'�` � �,'f� �. c __��u�'.l�r.r______liJ_______'
"P•�o c n.. : I �n�o�� fa ta a� N .. N � r .
6 �; � i � � �14 � W^. � �`.
yy j i i i �,/7 /9:10=7/;27�� ••o N.� �� � �j �
>I� o �,Fo. � i i�r+� � S ' . �� �i13i� % °^ ' �i i '
t.'1 7 , . . �L____'tll_____'J (
a h �e � � Ur I t io ` o�s S � so ti 4 4 ��\ �� �� �
, e :e: o ro i �,� a Q "`NILAND ,,,S�f �s ��a ,
C ., _ �e� �
H ' V o M I e I � A.. • I� ' Zl� _J
e I
�t _____ _____
N � e� .', . sa b so t M
u b � n ✓ w
� Y .n h/o //: j�7. �3 ti !iw o; !rr , 6 .. __ iva+_'_ _ ._---_FL--____� I
I .�6 �/t^'/3 /�' !/"lO.".�9 u� �� ��°+
�, .,,9,, �,, so , o" I i „�,� � R p ; s " �, R � j
..,. � .. P ' �--- „�
�
'� ALVADA �' ST. '. °> ' s°asr Si a . s st 9e e�.� n 2 i
� e „v, � l� ^ r��� � � �j � I � � �� ! i
1) fi I �I: V .
a � � � ' • , I � ..] � �I � N i ,
� � I! 2t li. �; �/S a� � �""::;,:..' I � i� � �I
/! 'r b fl � , b I ..?_� ..+,. � II , I �
v::.�.��.,.
]iBl W uai• I �: � � __p� _J /j(j � .
� � ,�« o l 7� � �'- .__ '-�_' h i
ii• n i � ..ii.
� �.°� l6 � � I � I., ri i
�' , i g a° ,° � � < k �' s a -- "`- -
, I . ,,., � , , �. � g � .� � � i� 1 j
I ,� n y � � � ` � ---
� a ° ` `� �[i-�"�.�`rl � I�___rt�. `� �ir�� 7 Z
� � � �^ ^ � •�� � i i"";:.y;::�:.;:: � �flu.a. �r T n
��' �!i>:iii�:i::<:::ii::i � � I' I � i �
��ti" w c � w � I .� ��t�'+.i<'::�o � � ��. I � I I L_..it__
.D I J pl � a � I�, J I .i �:
ioN �otr � 2 ^w :" ie ` � � 4 : � I � i' ei i ti i, �
, � ; i : a pm M k_ _:<::;:<� 1 I I � ��,.._ ,_ � �� �
�o r ' "v fI , ' � �
I� , I: 3er 1^� �= I G �% � I " I II: i. I' I i ,� "� �
ii9]e �?c ote {+ � ye : O� � L � P�:'i:ltc� Sos a�rt �f
, ' . • .... . � Y -- AVENU
� ' " �� --
� C�t/t�-�'�v
�� n_ crar ss.s u�t ieo _ v_� a�.. _. �,._ e'.,� iu.�. ,eu •
� o : "o v W e • C, L __ LS __` W / 7 .
��Ii-�.� I 1• J: s: 6ei w . � �_ / i�• 1 .3 : Z .
' � s� st . v � T re.eo ., � Z w � �' y- �� Lr __ „: - : > ` `� ��e� r.
,r a m..r W � w'Y`� � �i--i:s-- a+ a.u. .'
� r
rn i .. nser �.< r. ✓ [_'� � Q- _ S� i• o
,{�„ � - ^ A ° 6� � ----� °--='-'-- � `I 9 �
rt .]>��F RO 1..7� �.1�_ � 1 �� iii�T
, . 0 5 ,'ti 66 �" '� ,. '� � '
S _ :��, � , _ ,ti
i
'� o i m , 6 .,.,, �,.a�> 65 i /6 : .... f ,,, _.
` 6 n .n... � 1
�.r.;a' �,,.�i 6J W'_'__ • a ini. ' in
..
a � . . �. � L____"__ � i .
? � 8 x�3v� :.se 63 � U _—a.7 � .
�., :..00 � Q : i U
B �� . 9. a 62 .. � Z, ._.. �� F 9 I
„o s •. .. i H
' �O imi � S/ V . � � b� iii« ... Q
.e9 I %/ �p. 6p . � N : B `p�" /o i .
J
� . .,:,�. < ` . . . � � I � i ,.. �
_„� � � � i ,.; � , S � // � .
,,.. • w p � .,.
u. �. ' �s� - � � 4� � : � a ,.,,./, � ',..
LL .,u '
�' /! �an� ' � 57 W � U
i2 � P � J
:,,, Y a '
� � i3.,,v , � 56 F- n . ,' ,... � -- -�---- � -
•� y I i � w
/J�' fut io.fsi Q ' • Q � /I� t O " � .. � I
�-i-:�'— � � �i�.� 3 ,.55 � rl � . �` ?� U � ii. ° ia..: t � .