HomeMy Public PortalAbout10-13-87 PLANNING COMMISSION `j ,� ,
AGENDA
LYA'WOOD CITY PLANNI�lG COMMISSION;:�
�:
�GUL�R MEETING - 7:30 P.' M. / ��(r'� p
, LYNWOOD CITY HAI,L, 11330 BULLIS ROAD C �"�' Ofi� ����
CITY CLE�'KS O � Cf
cxto��er i3, �.�8� AP�! ��T 09 1 98I '
. . • �'r 6
� .'� �
LUCILLE KAPJKA
�HAIRPERSON
DONALD DOVE
. vzcE-c��T:�Exsorr EUGEPJE RAY�"IOND
- COMMISSIONER
LENA CDLE DENNIS
cor�czssro,rEx ROBfRT REID
C0�4fISS IONER
� ROY PRYOR DAVID J, WILLIS, JR,
COMMISSIOA'ER
, COMMSSSIOtiER
� CITY STAFF
DIRECTOF OF COMMIJNITY DEVELOPPfENT
PLANNERS .
VICENTE L. MAS Dorethea Tiltord
E�ctiiig Senior Planner
C0;4fISSIOV COUNSEL -
Henry S, l�rbosa
..
ey�� ��
OCT.OBER 13, 1987
OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Call meeting to order.
B. Flag Salute.
C. Roll Call.
D. Certification of Agenda posting
E. Approval of Minutes of September 8, 1987 -
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Special Permit for Dancina and Live Entertainment-Case No. 87056
11020 Atlantic Avenue (OSCar and Patricia Casillas)
Comments
This applicant is requesting a Special Permit to add Dancing
and Entertainment at the existing restaurant and cocktail
lounge.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully request that the Planning Commission
continue this case to the November 10, 1987, meeting of the
Planning Commission at the request of the applicant's
attorney, Miguel Garcia.
2. S ecial Permit for Dancin and Live Entertainment-Case No. 87059
12001 Atlantic Avenue (Irene Pena)
Comments :
The applicant is requesting a Special Permit for Dancing and
Live Entertainment at an existing cocktail lounge, 12001
Atlantic Avenue, Lynwood, CA., in the CB-1 (Controlled
Business) zone.
Recommended Action
Staff respectfully request that the Planning Commission
deny this application because staff has not received any
response to its communications to the applicant.
V10:AGENDA
1
.�� ��
3. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87057
12017 Atlantic Avenue (Leonel Vasque2)
Comments
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to rebuild a mini-market with off-sale alcoholic
beverages at 12017 Atlantic Avenue, Lynwood, CA.
Recommended Action
Staff respectfully requests that the Planning Commission
continue this application to the November 10, 1987, because
the applicant is required to submit a Parcel Map, in
addition to another site plan.
4. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87060
3562 Beechwood Avenue (Maria Briseno)
Comments
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to develop a two-story triplex at the rear of an
existing single-family dwelling at 3562 Beechwood Avenue,
Lynwood, CA.
Recommended Action
Staff respectfully request that, the Planning Commission
not open the public hearing and continue Case No. 87060 to
November 10, 1987. The applicant submitted plans but
decided she wants to redesiqn the entire project.
5. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87064
12502 Harris Avenue (Rafael Zapien)
Comments
This is an application for a Conditional Use Permit to
construct two, two-bedroom apartment units, with the required
parking and open space, at the rear of an existing dwelling unit.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2143:
1. Finding that Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 87064,
is categorically exempt from the provisions of the
State CEQA Guidelines, as amended.
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 87064, subject
to the stated conditions and requirements.
V10:AGENDA
;
2
w I•
,
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS:
6. Variance - Case No. 87077
Tom Lem (Chevron)
Comments:
The applicant is requesting approval of a Variance in order
to install a thirty-five (35') foot rotating sign at the
Chevron Service Station, 11401 S. Atlantic, Lynwood, CA.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2151:
1. Finding that Variance No. 87077, is Categorically
Exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines, as amended (Section 15301, Class 1 g).
2. Approving Variance to the height of thirty-five
( 35' ).:
7. Zonina Ordinance Amendment Case No. 87078
Comments:
The City of Lynwood is considering amending Chapter 25, the
Official Zoning Ordinance, with respect to requiring
additional parking for mini-malls.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully request that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2152:
1. Finding that Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 87078, is
Categorically Exempt from provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines, as amended (Section 15061 b 3)
2, Recommending that the City Council approve the
Findings in Resolution No. 2152, waive reading and
introduce the proposed ordinance.
V10:nupubhrg
3 '
,.. -
�'
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS:
None
STAFF COMMENTS
- AB2020 "The Bottle Bill"
- Appeal to City Council Planning Commission decision to grant
a constructional use permit to sell beer and wine in
conjunction with the operation of a bonafide, full-service
restaurant.
- Special meetinq of the Planning Commission of September 29,
1987.
COMMISSION ORALS:
PUBLIC ORALS:
(Information Items only)
ADJOURNMENT:
Adjourn to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission
on November 10, 1987, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Ha11 Council
Chambers, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California.
V10:nupubhrg
4 ,
.
�
'';Rr � , P �`"' fi n ; i Y fi iS � �� S,•`} �
, � ..�.�;�i t !, 1i. h'�'v�.
. �-1 "' ' . ... .. ..
� DATE:° � October 13, 1987 � �`���� �-��r �
. ._�,.._._..__.._.�.,•�---'.,,v
i
TO: PLANNING COMMIS5ION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas,� Director
Community Devel�opment Department
SUBJECT: Special Permit for Dancina and Live Enterta
Case No. 87056
Applicant: Oscar and Patricia Casillas
PROPOSAL
- The applicant is requesting a 5pecial Permit to add Dancing and
Entertainment at the existing restaurant and cocktail lounge
at 11020 Atlantic Avenue.
FACT5 ,
` 1. At its regular meeting of Tuesday July 14, 1987 the Planning
Commission decided to continue this application in order to
give the applicant additional time to secure additional
parking in order to meet the parking requirements. •
2. On Friday July 31, 1987, Planning Staff received a proposed �
shared parking lease agreement.between the applicant and
Tommy's Burgers for a period of one year. The shared parking
(parking lot lease) agreement submitted by the applicant
, does not meet requirements set forth in Section 25-19.6g of
• the Lynwood Municipal Code.
3. At its regular meeting of August 11, 1987, staff requested
� the Planning Commission continue the item in order to give
applicant additional time for an alternative solution to the
� parking problem.
_ � � � �� � �
{4. At its regular meeting of September 8, 1987, the Planning
Commission continued this matter to October 13, 1987, in
view of the City Attorney's opinion with respect to
dismissing the case without prejudice.
5. Staff has received a letter from the applicant's attorney,
Miguel Garcia, (See attached) requesting a continuation to
November 10, 1987.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully request that the Planning Commission not open
� the Public Hearing and continue this case to the November 10,
1987, meeting of the Planning Commission.
�
" RevgPlan: 870565P
;
/� s�. � � � - ' .. .
•---^ . . � .. ,.`� . .
LAW OFFICES OF � . . � �
MIGUEL F. GARCIA
. ' 1'I1E ESQUfRE BUILDING " �
SA�Y2 E. BEVERLY HOULEVARD, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90022 . TGLEPHONE: (213) 723-1890 (213) 72&189]
September 17, 1987
City of Lynwood •
A City Meeting Challenges
11330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, CA 90262
Re: Mr. and Mrs. Oscar Casillas
Case Ne.: 87056—Speci:�7. Permit
for DancinQ and'Live Entermainment
Dear Ms. Tilford:
I acknowledge receipt of your letter. No date noted on the same.'
My clients are not able to meet your September 18, 1987 deadline
" for the submission of documents to the Planning Division.
Therefore I believe the Planning Commission meeting of November
� 1987 is more realistic. Please continue the captioned matter for
the November meeting.
Very truly yours,
{ �'n-t,� `�,�
�
�.
M GUEL � GAR IA,
Attorney at Law
MFG/sc
Enclosure
�
r,^mr.ciT�.T, „�. 1
t�. � . . . ! ���..^ i ; � ��� � �S � n (� . .
� � �'� � � ��1�� �� ll.� �
. � (,, . � . . _. ...
� DATE: October 13, 1987 v� �``:`v', —__ � 1 0�q ��:
' TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Developmenf Department'
SUBJECT: Special Permit for Dancina and Live Entertainment
Case No. 87059
Applicant: Irene Pena
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting a Special Permit to allow Dancing and
Live Entertainment at an existing cocktail lounge, 12001 Atlantic
, Avenue, Lynwood, CA., in the CB-1 (Controlled-Business) zone.
FACTS
1. At its regular meeting of July 30, 1987, the Site Plan
Review Committee requested that the applicant submit another
site plan, because the alley will be vacated. The alley was
the only access to the parking area for the proposed use. �
The revised site plan
2. On August 11, 1987, the Planning Commission continued this
case to its regular meeting of September 8, 1987. However,
the applicant has not submitted the required documents to
- the Planning Division. :
3. This matter was continued from the September 8 Planning
Commission, in view of the City Attorney's opinion with
, respect to dismissing cases without prejudice.
RECOMMENDATION
�. Staff respectfully requests that the Planning Commission not
open the 'Public Hearing and deny Case No. 87059.
Disk 11-1:87059sp .
-,
� 3
,
�:,, �!,��' , ; � �:.�.�!� i��a�. �
�. , �
__----�,-
�
, . C,�"� � �. i�'d ��. _ `b '► 0 5 —� j
� ���
DATB: October 13, 1987
" TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Dept.
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-No. 87057
Applicant: Leonel Vasquez
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to rebuild a
mini-market which has off-sale alcoholic beverages at 12017
Atlantic Avenue, Lynwood, CA.
FACTS
1. At its regular meeting-of July 30. 1987, the Site Plan Review
Committee requested that the applicant submit another site
, plan, because the lot dimensions on the plan were inaccurate.
Also, the parking had to be redesigned so that cars would not
' exit by backing into the street.
2. On Auqust 11, 1987, the Planning Commission continued this
matter to its regular meeting of September 8, 1987, since the •
applicant had not submitted the revised site plan. On �August
• 26, 1987, the revised site plan was submitted to the Planning
. ' Division.
3. The Site Plan was reviewed by the Site Plan Review Committee
on September 24, 1987. This site plan was rejected because
• the ingress and egress to the site was not corrected. In
addition, the applicant is now required to file a Parcel Map.
' RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfulTy reques.ts that the Planning Commission not
open the public hearing and continue this matter to the next
,' regular meeting of the Planning Commission on November 10,
. 1987.
' D-9-1:87057ctd '
;
r �- , - , �,, ,� y
,. � � , ., _:.�;�� ��� ._.�_._,..�„
( 'ii r
. ll;"t.. �:��. � l � l. O
DATE: October 13, 1987 _.. _. .... .,- - ,--,.,
T0: PLANNING COMMISSION
'� FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 87060 ,
'Appli.cantc Maria Briseno
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit
to develop a two-story triplex at the rear of an existing single
family dwelling at 3562 Beechwood Avenue, Lynwood, CA.
FACTS
1. At ifs regular meeting of Julg 30, 1987, the Site Plan
Review Committee requested that the applicant submit a
, revised site plan due to the incorrect dimensions and
measurements. Due to an inconsistency in our noticing ,
" procedures, the legal notice was published prior to Site
, Plan Review; thereby, requir.in,g that the case be agendized
. a;t that time.
2. At its regular meeting of August il, 1987, Staff requested
the Planning Commission continue this item in order for the
' applicant to submit a revised site plan.
3. On August 26, 1987, staf,f received the revised site plan
from the architect. The plans were reviewed by the Site
Plan Review Committee on September 24, T987; however, the
applicant now wishes to change the entire design of the
. proposal, hence another site plan shall be required.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests the Planninq Commission not open
the public hearing and continue this matter to the next
regular meeting of the Planning Commission on November 10,
1987.
D-9-1:8706Ocup
;
.: 87064
" , . - � ,r, � � e �s� . ,] �. � � .
. . � j'; r ti � 1 - ` j i - ��4=.1 { �{�
. � f L�ii !F'�il.
DATE: October 13, 1987 ,� � 4 ���,'� �
� �i �E� t_. h''�'�.�. $� � t,���
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
• Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 87064
Applicant: Rafael Zapien
., PROPOSAL•
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to build a
duplex at 12502 Harris Avenue, in the R-2 (Two-Family
' Residential) zone.
FACTS:
' 1. Source of Authorit .
Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that
a ConditionaT Use Permit be obtained in order to build or
"_ relocate dwelling units in the R-2 zone.
2. Pro ert Location.
' The subject property consists of a single lot between
Carlin Avenue and Olanda Street. (See attached Location
Map.)
3. Property Size.
The subject is rectangular in shape and is approximately
sixty three feet (63') wide and one hundred and seventy
seven feet (177') deep; the total area is approximately 9600
." square feet.
4. Existina Land Use.
_.
The property is presently developed with single family
residential. The surrounding land uses are as follows:
North - Single-Family East - Single-Family
& Multiple-Family & Multiple-Family
South - Single-Family West - Single-Family
, & Multiple-Family
' 5. Land Use Description.
The General Plan designation for the subject property is
,. Townhouse & Cluster Housing, and the aoning designation is
, R-2 (Two-Family Residential). The surrounding land use
. designations are as follows:
Disk 8:-87064cup ,
. 1
;
General Plan Zonin
North - Townhouse & North - R-2
° Cluster Housing
South - Single-Family South - R-2
East - Townhouse & East - R-2
Cluster Housing
West - Townhouse & West - R-2
'. Cluster Aousing
6. Proiect Characteristics
The applicant proposes to remove the existing accessory
. �structure at the rear of the single-family dwelling and
build a two-story duplex for a total of three (3) dwellinq
units. The development will consist of two, (2) two-bedroom
units and five (5) enclosed garages beneath the units, with
laundry and storage facilities located at the rear of the
property. A six-foot (6') block wall fence will be built on
the perimeter of the lot, except in the front yard set back,
in which the maximum.height is four (4') ft.
7. Site Plan Review
At its regular meeting on August 26, 1987, the Site Plan
' Review Committee approved the proposed project, subject to
" the conditions and requirements stated in the attached
Resolution.
8. Zoning Enforcement History
None of record.
9. Public Res onse
Siwan Thomas., 4152 Carlin Avenue, Lynwood, commented at fhe �
public hearing of September 8, 1987, that the area has too
many apartments.
- ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
.� l. Consistency with General Plan �
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing Zoning
classification (R-2) and the General P1an designation
_ (Townhouse & Cluster Housing). Therefore, the granting of
the Conditional Use Permit No. 87064 will not adversely
affect the General Plan.
2., Site Suitability
� The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the proposed development relative to structures, parking,
walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development
features required by the Zoning Ordinance.
3. Compatibility
The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of
multiple and single family residential developments;
therefore, the project will be compatible with the
� deveTopment in the area.
Disk 8:87064cup
Z ,
4. Com liance with Develo ment Standards
The. proposed subject meets all of the development standards
,. required by the Zoning Ordinance with respect to parking;
front, side, and rear-yard setbacks; distance between
structures; lot coverage; open space and landscaping;
' building height; unit size and density.
The base density within the R-2 Zone (14 unit/acre) allows
the development of three (3) units.
5. Conditions of Approval �
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have
a negative effect on the values of the surroundinq
properties or interfere with or endanger the public health,
safety or welfare.
6. Benefits to Community
The proposed development will aid in aesthetically upgrading
the neighborhood and will act as a catalyst in fostering
other quality developments. Furthermore, the development
will add favorably to the City's housing stock and will
'provide additional affordably-priced housing in furtherance
of the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan.
7. Environmental Assessment
This 'development is categorically exempt from the CEQA
-. requirements as amended Sectiori 15303, Class 3.
� RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration The Planning
: Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2143:
1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No.
87064, os categorically exempt from the provisions of
the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended (Section 15303
� � Class 3).
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 87064, subject to
the stated conditions and requirements.
ATTACHMENTS
' 1. Location Map.
2. Plans.
3. Resolution No. 2143.
` 3
�.C)C,�-�TiO� S111A�
;
� � . G �cJ�`z'..tii_` n.-_� i,. � .ro�. . � � ,.
� . . /0¢______ __qr___ � 6/ -^ __�
� . . . ItJ ��uz _ .'.--__ ��cie � .. „�
.. - ' � T "'q�___ '_to- . h � 95___ 't2-.
� � Z - : :_1..._'_`'°n �� y �. �a S �. ^ :
' . Q � 4d ��t>a� , � '_ 9� M g 'l157q�� ? .�.'L �_' 6! _,
rR ,,,� Q �__ � » ,o.,. � s,°„-- —�o
. . .97 __4r___ 2 "95_'" a ,
. . ` ° � 0 `'` i:ri� �.,t ,.� .r. .
�
LAVINIA
�• „ „r ,, r , ,, i d .,. .. „r , i ,, s;
e�i .- i �. , i io i- �� 1= ;,i �
- - � � -, .� -- ���y ` ` j ' �j. :i Ci" .��� I' �> � .�,,•°� .
, . , ' .>. �I` 1 1� .1 al 7i �. � � i o
� � � �i . Iv :I �I `� I I I v l
.. _��-- __ ` i j j � � �" I �
' �yJ " i.,�. N I �n,�� i I �I . I 1 h
, , 'Q . �_-_ __- I[S �[1 .ItS o lTOi �.I I � it
a' TrrT. , �F'�a'!c ii.e� I I°�� 6<
0 , a S m. W 6 �o � i �� 0/7
. . �.�u �.3 i�p,.l c
' � � �a ! Q o .� o. � � � ^.
S _ ` a ' t 7 ., ` ea u� n io
�� � W it�e.nc r.� i fo> �� t.�c . So1 ° � x'��r� ���
, . Z � ' v F ,n. s, � � I
a' � ,itu� � 30l t B ti . I i 0 �
o � --- � Z ..,., _ � ,,, �,o „; ,,Z; r 3 �' �„,
V �.. $� .. _ S��Y � ..9. �u, I /nn� 16
,v ti /�� �� L � � N .� S�a3 50 �� ,� rev.
AVENUE ° —
.. ,eo s_ruv_ , a� Fts
e ALVADA � ST. �
,o�
CiIT � . J/BA6� . 1� �v/ ie .°,I" ' .j ' f � 33 f3 Lql " ^ 11 ` � 4
f �
I�
µ� I � T -- �eo -- i�c I� a3 zz r�, '� ..;_
-i � T R p � � ,.,,. y � I >> �s
I �O . � a it p n V
�OirJ� c�G� a - ia°� E�� 2rt I /3s via� ; �. �� o d
ti iie�
0
. . ' _112�0_.� � , � e10 .� a
LOT 6 0 ° h � � �i�' �� " el
, . o ~----- I � ': ° ' /7 .
ii o
�� o . ' v ,i.,� e% � �n � .� �
. . . ` � �r� �-_ie_,: "'��� F � `, e �
I �� ��
" ' - � -( '^�� �o �� � ppRTIJN LOi 2' P ^ w � �8
S � � r
. . � ' � a ° =� � � l vr S � pQ
� //]if �� . . .. � ~ d �6 16 BS � �f �/(9]0 � /3(. o.[a .M1�' 9a ' .
' ' �
$ � a � �
7]03� ZIa4 � So Oo� sag nN�e P.33�v 13 cSef 053f uJf Y/do _
x� sr � . �� S ' -� :' S� � �a.'eo ,','• Ssrs � �s �-ss �'ss � �° � ' _ a
� i T z^ r ��7 ez R± J.YBU��� � 0� � 6e ���� �� 1�� 3: s: 6Bi M1
��e� s �' ie u �6 �� ^ i n 3 ; � f�OR'i�ION � � � � 2 a � .
\ h 1♦. L07� 7 � o� x.:.n �..r
�c / S/ see / i i , � I eo au ,� ,4:o xa s3 s3 r m.ea �. e
� . . • v � TR,�7CT � ¢ t � inv m<r : _.< < ✓ e.at
'I.see � Y s� st5 sot �Y r��?' J �� rs � ss ss � ss rn. <. �i� ,d, naai �: r .von� ne b�tl .
..i /9 )� . . n .�. ^ w 3 • //., _ �o Itv. 9B.D9 ., n � U.� � �e.io . �t . , i .,i 66 `'
�U °ie i� is ir_ i�� .a> s� ,i � R E � Q., �a�. S �,> � u$_!..
�' � I^ � 11 t r` o� ^ /9 /B 'F S ezs T l 5 0 .,<vi \ �� 6S
� � r O + � t
�.n. si ry � si •`� > Aar �`' m �F� o uer N ,�. p �; 6 . � • 1``-
� °. ,o $U�� a� c v 5.'1a � � :i7 � 6 2 6 � 6G
, na. r o g^ � O . \ .ec�a' �'.,, x
0
AVENUE �
� i5ve si� _ s . ' 3i �tai N s e. ° �� n "'., o cit ��-.. 7 'e 7 8 x.�v' . e 63
�I)d P 35 P Jb , JI 36 09 bb F is _ 8.5� g:�, 62
. a�
' } .. _ se� � , m /O ? . �� 6/
I�/Rw 3/ Si Sa t 0 \ So /SII •�. R >o - 95. . 9 , a ,_ �s �
� K.. /fT! �.iy � xsea // � 3 �
__� � �; y a�„e y ,,.� .
io �_ - „_�o i1 S � s9
.. . L// �.�s,e� // /3 :s»' s.e �
. � . . »m � ' 11
� � � 2 . N /< <��-r � �.u.57
' q 2 P
. ., i�o��.,e�,' � �,:sa. � � :a„55
. - . . � �� � . . � /3 ,iz J
:]3� � �
. � �I / e a ' �> >�,r � .�� � `5
1] uo t � ��53+
„ � �. �. e,.. . I�� 3 L..,�_
` . : Y� W � ,
. . . . � .)�a� 6� .31�0 � . � {o `54
. . . � �� , /di m �'V } f � (ti
LAN _ �
, , -- -- $ --
; i —� , �— _—_— -- —, � --
� ;
. CASE N0. �]O�U°1�
87064 ,
� RESOLUTION NO. 2143
,,. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
' CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 87039 TO CONSTRUCT TWO (2) UNITS IN
THE R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, 12502
HARRIS AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CA.
' WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to
law, conducted a public hearing on subject application for a
Conditional Use Permit; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission carefully considered
all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for
- development in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone.
Section 1
' The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as
� follows:
A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size
: and shape to accommadate the structures, parking,
walls, landscaping, driveways and other
development features required by the Zoning
Ordinance.
B. The granting of the proposed Conditional Use
' Permit will 'not adversely affect the Lynwood
General Plan.
C. The structures as proposed, or modified, subject
to conditions, will not have a negative effect on
the values of surrounding properties or interfere
with or endanger the public health, safety or
- welfare. '
D. The site will be developed pursuant to the current
zoning, regulations and site plan submitted,
� reviewed and approved by the Site Plan Review
Committee.
E. The proposed development will add favorably to the
housing stock and will provide additional
affordably priced housing in concert with the
policies of the Housing Element to the General
Plan.
": ' F: The proposed development will aid in aesthetically
upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in
, fostering other quality developments.
� Section 2
The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based
upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby
', approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 87064, provided the
following conditions are observed and complied with at all times.
Di•sk 8:Reso2143
. ;
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments.
2. The applicant, or his representative, shall 5ign a Statement
of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and
agrees to the conditions of this resolution within fifteen
(15) days from the date of approval of said resolution by the
Planning Commission.
3. All requirements of all City departments shall be met.
4. All City of Lynwood Municipal Code requirements shall be
met.
PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS
5. The total development will consist of two (2) residential
apartment units along with parking and other amenities.
6. A minimum of six (6) parking spaces shall be provided. At
least three (3) of the total parking spaces shall be covered.
' 7. A minimum if twenty-five. percent (250) of the lot shall be
landscaped and provided with an automatic irrigation system.
8. Apartment building and unit numbers shall be plainly visible
and shall be a minimum of four inches (4") in height and
shall be contrasting in color to the background.
9. The Community Development Department shall have the right of
reasonable inspection, as with any other business within the
City, for the purpose of protecting the general health,
safety and welfare.
10. A trash enclosure shall be provided per Building Division
standards.
11. All electrical and plumbing installation shall be performed
by a licensed contractor.
12. A landscape plan shall be submitted and approved prior to
receiving building permits.
13. No principal building on the site shall exceed a height of
thirty-five (35') feet.
14. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved, and shall have
sufficient illumination for security.
15. Construction shall be completed within six (6) months from
date of issuance of building permits.
16. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved.
17. Final building elevations, including materials of
construction, shall be submitteeed to and approved by the
Building Official prior to issuance of any building permits.
Disk 8:Reso2143
18. Before any building permits may be issued, the
applicant/developer shall pay $1.50 per square foot for
residential buildings to the Lynwood Unified School District,
pursuant to Government Code Section 53080.
19. Demolition permit shall be obtained prior to removing the
structure at the rear of the property.
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS:
20. Provide approved (U.L. and 5tate Fire Marshal) smoke
detectors for each unit. (U.B.C.)
21. Provide one (1) 2A type fire extinguisher 'within 75 ft.
travel distance.
22. Provide 4" dry fire line to rear portion of property. (Obtain
specific requirements from Lynwood Fire Department.)
23. Where security gates are installed on premises, the locking
mechanism shall be of the type that does not require a key or
any special knowledge to exit premises. Also, provide a Knox
Box at front of property.
24. Where security bars are placed on bedroom windows, they shall
meet rrequirements of U.B.C., Section 1204.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS:
25. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered
Civil Engineer.
26. Connect to public sewer. Each buildirg shall be connected
, separately. Construct laterals as necessary.
27. Provide and install one (1) marbelite street pole with light
fixture, underground services and conduits north of northerly
drive approach.
' 28. Underground all utilities.
29. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all
off-site improvements.
3-0. Existing structure to be underground utilities.
31. Align existing drive approaches with driveways.
Section 3 . The proposed project is Categorically
Exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as
amended (Section 15303, Class 1).
Section 4 . A copy of this Resolution shall be delivered
to the applicant.
Disk S:Reso2143
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 13th day of October, 1987,
by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSEMT:
ABSTAIN:
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
Community Development Dept. General Counsel
Disk 8:Reso2143
I
' ��lN1r���.1 �••�-r� ���
!",M�...,',;,. i ..��dj I''d�. �
�t���. �� �. 41 1
DATE: October 13, 1987 �.. ���,..._�
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Variance 87077
Applicant: Chevron U.S.A.
P. O. Box 2833
La Habra, CA.
Mr. S. L. Reber
Proposal•
The applicant is requesting a variance to increase the height of
the major identification sign and two (2) price signs at the
Chevron Service Station located at 11401 Atlantic Avenue, in the
C-3 zoning district.
Additionally the applicant requests an increase in the sign face
of the pricing sign to include the words "auto care".
Facts
1. Source of Authority.
Section 25-16.17 of the Lynwood Municipal Code which
regulate service stations sign regulations. Section 25-33
of the Lynwood Municipal Code. Section 25-26 requires that a
Variance be obtained from the Planning Commission when,
because of special circumstances applicable to the property,
the strict aplication of the Zoning Ordinance deprives such
property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the
vicinity and under identical zoning classification.
Government Code Section 65906 - State regulations with
respect to Variances applicable to General Law cities.
2. Propertv Location.
The site located at the southwest corner of Atlantic and
Century and occupies four (4) parcels. (See attached
vicinity map.)
3. Pro�Y Sizes
The site is rectangular in shape and is approximately 16,480
square feet in size, generally 100' x 160'. The signs
currently on the site consist of one (1) 27'7" rotating pole
sign and two (2) gasoline price signs, one of which is
attached to the existing pole sign and is proposed for the
increase of square footage to include the words "auto care".
4. Existina Land Use
I The site, presently serving as a gasoline service station
with minor auto repair bays, is surrounded by the "following
land uses.
North - Commercial/Retail
South - Commercial/Retail
East - Commercial/Retail
West - Commercial/Retail
5. Land Use Description
General Plan Zoning
North - Commercial C-3
South - Commercial C-3
East - Commercial C-3
West - Commercial C-3
6. Proiect Characteristics
The site is four lots located on the southwest corner of
Atlantic Avenue and Century Blvd. Approximately 100' x 160'.
The variance request would allow the proponent to extend the
height of the pole siqn from its current height of 27'7" to
35'. Section 25.33.; Subsection 6.c.1., allows on-premise
freestanding, monfreeway oriented signs to extend to a
height of 35'. However, Section 25.16.17 subsection d.l.,
which regulates service stations, allows one (1)
. freestanding sign not to exceed twenty-five (25') feet in
height. It is apparent by the inconsistency in code
sections that service stations are unable to take advantage
of the type of signage available to other commercial
establishments in the City of Lynwood. The contradiction of
code sections creates an awkward situation for commercial
developement. Staff's findings indicate that granting this
Variance request would not be detrimental to neighborhood
properties. Additionally, the increase in the site of the
price sign �would add approximately 8 square feet for the
addition of "auto care" to the sign face.
7. Site Plan Review
At its regular meeting on September 23, 1987, the Site Plan
Review Committee approved the proposed project, subject to
the conditions and requirements stated in the attached
Resolution. The Committee did not grant approval for a
rotating sign or any encroachment in the public right-of-
way.
8. Zoninq Enforcement History
None of record.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION:
1. Consistencv with General Plan
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning
designation C-3 and with the General Plan designation of
commercial.
2. Site Suitability
� The property is adequate in size and shape to accomodate the
proposed new signage relative to structures, parking, walls,
fences, landscaping, driveways and other development
features required by the Zoning Ordinance. There is not an
anticipated increase in traffic caused by the new signage.
3. Com atibility_
The proposed signage is compatible with the commercial
nature of neighboring properties.
4. Compliance with Development Standards
Specific Findings:
There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the development site that do not
apply generally to sites in the same zone, in that the
' inconsistency in code sections relating to signage would
allow a 35' sign to be installed at another commercial
property not having gasoline sales.
Granting the application is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the
applicant, and to prevent unreasonable property loss or
unnecesssary hardship, in that denying this application
would substantially restrict the right of the property owner
to enjoy full property rights consistent with the General
Plan and the Municipal Code.
Granting the Variance will not be detrimental or injurious
to property or improvements in the vicinity of the
development site, or to the public health, safety or general
welfare because the business and land use would not be
altered by the increase in signage, and would not cause any
negative impact to adjacent properties.
Granting the Variance is consistent with the General Plan
and the Zoning Ordinance and will not constitute a grant of
special privilege inconsistent with limitation on other
properties in the vicinity and in the same zone.
5. Conditions of Approval
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have
a negative effect on the values of the surrounding
properties or interfere with or endanger the public health,
safety or welfare.
6. Environmental Assessment
This development is categorically exempt from the provisions
of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended section.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2151:
1. Finding that the Variance Case No. 87077, will not have
a significant affect on the environment.
2. Approving Variance No. 87077, subject to the stated
Findings.
Disk 15: 87077VAR
i
I
87077VAR
RESOLUTION NO. 2151
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING ZONE
VARIANCE NO. 87077 TO ALTER THE
EXISTING POLE SIGN FROM 27'7" TO 35' IN
HEIGHT AND TO INCREASE TAE SIGN FACE OF
TWO (2) PRICE SIGNS FROM 24 SQUARE FEET
TO 30 SQUARE FEET.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on subject
application for a Variance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission carefully considered all
pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing;
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines that said application for a Variance should be
approved for the following reasons and findings:
a. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
or conditions applicable to the property or to the
intended use that do not apply generally to other
property or classes of use in the same vicinity and
zone, in that the sign code for commercial development
permits pole signs of 35' in height and increase the
double face price sign from 24 square feet to 30'
square feet.
b. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by
other property in the same vicinity and zone in that
commercial developments in the immediate vicinity have
. installed pole signs of 35' in height and that the
increase of the square footage of the price sign is
the addition of lettering for "Auto care".
c. The Variance will not be detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in the vicinity of the
development site, or to the public health, safety or
general welfare because it would be consistent with
the commercial signage in the vicinity.
d. The Variance is consistent with the General P1an and
the Zoning Ordinance and will not constitute a grant
_ of special privilege inconsistent with limitation on
other properties in the vicinity and in the same zone,
in that the Lynwood Municipal Code, Section 25-33
permits signage of the proposed height.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
hereby finds and determines, based upon the aforementioned
findings, that said Zone Variance should be approved, subject to
the following conditions:
1. The sign shall not revolve, rotate, or oscillate,
nor give the appearance of such.
2. The sign shall not project into a public right-of-
way or established setback line before an
encroachment permit has first been obtained from the
Department of Public Works.
.
Section 3. A copy of this Resolution shall be delivered to
the applicant.
APPROVED ANDADOPTED this lOth day of October, 1987, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
Community Development Dept. General Councel
Disk 11: RES02151
87078
DATE: September 14, 1987 f'� P 1 ,�;�n'i y i Li'ii {�'dU. � .
'
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION t' i! r,' �. C j� g � U � 8
V; :�.;� .._ i � ..; . _.m_,_.�.-.�..,....-----,q �
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: PARKING FOR MINI-MALLS
PROPOSAL
The purpose of the proposed code amendment is to address the
parking requirements for a particular land use which has
exhibited some inadequacy in the actual number of parking spaces
provided.
FACTS
Recently it has become apparent that the current parking
standards of one (1) parking space required for each 400 square
feet (1:400) of retail commercial floor area is not adequate for
the actual users of mini malls, or neighborhood convenience
centers. This is particularly true when tenants in the mini=malls
are dispensing food or food products.
ISSUES and ANALYSIS
' The development of mini-malls generally are undertaken without
committed tenants. In many cases the developers have no idea who
` will occupy the space. Morever, there is no way of knowing future
tenant users that would replace the original user, causing
conflicts in the number of parking spaces necessary to serve,
both tenant and customer.
Generally, the proposer will provide the minimum number of spaces
not programming into the design the possibility of tenants that
would require additional parking over the requirement for retail
use. The type of tenant that is a more intensive user is
typically a food service, i. e. restaurant/sandwich shop, with or
without seating, a donut shop or a mini-market operation.
Peak hours, of use for food preparation, depending on type is
lunch and late afternoon/early evening during dinner hours as
well as peak traffic times.
Typically, a mini-mall would not exceed 15,000 square feet in
size, therefore it can become the maximum cut-off for any
proposed parking calculation that is considered for this
particular land use. Calculating the code required parking for
the maximum square footage build-out is as follows:
15,000 gross square feet divided by
1 space for each 400 sq. ft. = 37.5 (38) spaces
A mini-market tenant would occupy approximately 2000 square feet
of floor area. As you can see from the calculation used below a
mini-market user requires a greater number of parking spaces as
per code requirements. •
2000 sq. ft. divided by
1 space for each 300 sq. ft. = 6.6 (7) spaces
;
A food serving use of 1200 sq. ft. required per code greater
intensity of parking as shown below:
1200 sq. ft. divided by
1 space for each 100 sq. ft. = 12 spaces
The same development of 15,000 square feet with these two (2)
tenants would now require 49 parking spaces rather than 38
parking spaces. This is an increase of 13% over the code
requirement for retail use.
Consequently it seems appropriate that the proposed code
amendment be adopted which would amend the parking to accomodate
the following calculation for mini-mall development. One (1)
parking space for each 350 square feet of gross floor area.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
The proposed amendment to the Municipal Code is exempt from the
California Environmential Quality Act.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests NO. 2152: that, after consideration,
the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution
recommending to the City Council adoption of an ordinance
amending Section 25-14.63 of the Lynwood Municipal Code to add
Section M, to require a parking calculation of one (1) space per
350 square feet of gross floor area for mini-malls of 15,000
square feet or less.
a. Finding that the proposed amendment is exempt from the
provisions of the State,CEQA Guidelines, as amended
(15061 b 3).
b. Recommending that the City Council approve the findings
in Resolution No. 2152, waive reading and introduce the
proposed ordinance.
Disk 16: Parking
87078
RESOLUTION 2152
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOP-
TION OF AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 25, THE OFFICIAL
ZONING ORDINANCE, OF THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE,
WITA RESPECT TO THE CALCULATION USED TO DETERMINE
THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS (MINI-MALLS)
UNDER 15,000 SQUARE FEET.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
did, pursuant to law, conduct a public hearing on a proposed
amendment to the Lynwood Municipal Code with respect to the above
referenced subject;
- WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing;
and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has determined
that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of
the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended;
Section 1. The Planning Commission riereby finds and
determines as follows:
A. The proposed amendment will be consistent with
the objectives and the development policies of the
City of Lynwood.
B. The proposed amendment will not unreasonably
constrain the use of property by landowners and
developers.
C. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the
General Plan.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby
recommends City Council adoption of the proposed amendment.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of October, 1987, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
V10:Reso2152
87078
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
Community Development Dept. General Counsel ,
V10:Reso2152
�,'i
87078
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
Community Development Dept. General Counsel
V10:Reso2152
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LYNWOOD AMENDING CHAPTER, THE OFFICIAL
ZONING ORDINANCE, OF THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL
CODE WITH RESPECT TO THE CALCULATIONS USED
TO DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES
REQUIRED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SMALL
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS (MINI-MALLS) UNDER
15,000 SQ. FT.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES HEREBY FIND,
RESOLVE AND DETERMINE A$ FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 25, Section 25-14.6 3, "Minimum off-
street parking requirements" is hereby amended as follows:
(m) Small neighborhood centers (mini-malls) under 15,000
sq. ft. shall provide one (1) parking space for each
350 sq. ft. of gross floor area.
Section 2. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection,
subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of of this
ordinance, or the application thereof to any person or place, is
for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
ordinance or its application to other persons or places.
The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted
this ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision,
sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the
fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences,
clauses, phrases, or portions, or the application thereof to any
person or place, be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said .
City held on the day of , 1987, and
� finally adopted and ordered published at a meeting
of said Council held on the day of , 1987,
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Paul Richards II, Mayor
V10:87078ord
' ATTEST:
Andrea L. Hooper,. City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
° Community Development Dept. General Counsel
V10: 87078ord
MEMORANDUM �
DATE: November 10, 1987
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
,- Community Developement Dept.
� SUBJECT: Proposed ordinance establishing recycling centers
to accept redeemable beverage containers in
compliance with Assembly Bill (AB) 202-0.
Background
The 1986 session of the State Legislature considered and
approved the issue of recycling beverage containers. This is in
direct response to the conoern over the deminishing number of
lawful sites or potential lawful sites. A method of reducing
solid waste is to encourage the community to consider recycling
those items which are renewable such as aluminum, glass and
plastic. The method for encouraging recycles rests on the
requirement of the customer paying a one (.O1) cent fee
deposited into a state account to be returned to the recycles
upon proof supplied bg the recycler that it has accepted the
actual number of containers for recycling. .
The law requires that local qovernments grant to recyclers
. permits to operate either mobile facilites and/or reverse vending
machines within "convenience zones." Mobile recycling facilities
consist of typically a truck equipped with bins to hold the
recyclables. The recycling equipment would be located on the site
a minimum of 30 hours per week; at least 5 of those 30 hours must
be other than Monday thru Friday 9:OOAM to 5:OOPM. Reverse
vending machines consist of somethinq on the order of a soft
drink machine where cans, bottles or plastic containers are
deposited one at a time in the machine and at least the one (.O1)
cent deposit is returned automatically. These machines are
stationary or permanently fixed. Attached is a drawing supplied
by one of the companies proposing to locate a reverse vending
machine site in a convenience zone at the Lucky Market located at
10721 Atlantic Blvd.
Establishment of convenience zones was based on information
accumulated: by the State Department of Conservation. A
:'` convenience zone is an area within a one-half (1/2) mile radius
of a supermarket. A supermarket was defined as a full-line self
service retail store with gross annual sales of Two Million
dollars ($2,000.000.00) or more annually. The state established
a. total of 2,743 zones, of which six (6) zones are located in
Lynwood (a map is attached for your information).
' In addition to reverse vending machines and mobile recycling
facilities, the proposed ordinance sets standards for placing
permanent recycling facilities in the manufacturing (M) zones.
The location of permanent recycling facilities would be regulated
by the ordinance as to proximity to residential zones,
landscaping, fencing and parking requirements.
- The ordinance sets up an administrative procedure where by
the Community Development Director would be able to issue a
permit providing the applicant complies with all the development
standards established in the ordinance for reverse vending
machines and mobile recycling facilities. The permanent
recycling facility would require a Conditional Use Permit for
placement within a Manufacturing (M) zone.
.. ;
CONCLUSION
Staff is currently preparing a draft ordinance which is '
expected to be submitted £or Planning Commission consideration on
November 10, 1987.
V10:RECYMEMO
I
� / Y � )1G1i ( ! ,. '� y y' , .�mslvw r ._ �° � � . d � _
�nAE h � 1 ... � � st ti:gli < . - "t :yt 1 �
9iai � �; anvF ,: i -._ �'�SS i�: e 1 � ' w � �� vt � � �� ` )
4l e�e �
� Tk �s�d+� t.� �� 5'" i�� _ Y � '� i�' i � f r " F ��:
uy i :' � . ` n . 2 � i j � 'tt
, ' o[A�.� � I (Y i t �� °�t ,� II
i O � :. l I ��� ; LT �� '� p�„a F( . V_ . Y..
Y � J I aar � � � �.A .� n ,�,� u � �t � �. � - ♦ r � t I��._.
�� "f � I: �i � i �.� � '� ' H�r �i � i .�- � $ ti r y .� � d vf;
•'( �: s . i =' . R : f t� � •' " �� n.. �/
1 t i � � ° x .. W i � �! c2'� i - 7
=-M�rzM r ' i f? � i ' i .. �5 . �.
L wfi � � , �-i� -1 i 4' i '- �� a^' . .� v' {�� � .
� T7 i .. e �� , �, •h r� �.�.-r�`-v i .�� � i...� R.. , 3i � � _ i
� � f i � xT�'� � �t. i . T��� r r �€ � � 7 her l w1 �' � _
y p �� f .y�I "' b v m ArS;soA9 f� ' I � .
V �F
'� ''�f R �� � i�� �. ya � u.':.:� . � � . f ~ � .�.. �.
�
+e�' Y ' � i ° �: ._ ; � . ; � � .\� , � ^ .:n.
' ' �. � � . � � ._.
a ^ 1
� p � F i M � : 1 4 �+. _ f r � . I���"
/ � ^hHoie �" � f`'- � ' ... ���. � ' �� . ' �� �o- .� ►: i �
� . : 1 � � u ( �� wv � _ ���
`' � I i �. ' ..e...:: r � eJ[ . E i i � � � � � �. . E . . ..
� � 1 ,. , �� �,,, , _ , ° y � � i n �
II � i il 5 � I� oi � tr '' 's '� � � � ' J ' i '�
+.� 4(,n;r*fiCaS`F � ^' �I i �yj .� � i �'..' '� � I g � ,+-- �.: 2� i� �' l i
� ! YL �� 4 (k1D�' 1 �"'d *wl ° ��� i� '. � �. � ys �. y q 1.' I a � � 1 "e '
� ° os hrr � :��� t,O R 1 �RA7'E � Cr d . � i � � p � t � z cs � n
i 1 F �"'��J7t�M1�a�. A �, ii � � { d � �� ��. .a. v �x : �1� t� � � � � .
{ � t i .�' ,. � � '�"�s r .� T �REt . t� ' 3 x J -� d �� � �E ' i
Y �,
'yi i i i .� I �� Q` .' � F ot,e nc � � •-"' ,F¢,� �Y'`"x � ` 1 ` ' .
j ' � St En�ydl e M� � I'. �Selr H � i ,� � `'� r�y"_.��"' � � ,
' '' &A 9 �� �, h �,� G � v,
� � L nc 1�y,�- :-.- '� e�- �Y I �' n � � �° ro� � � {� � � p �
, � �_ #} 1 ^d�K i�. �.�.s,w � 4 'H056 `��. . (�P'RAG ..�� 17 �...I ..' ��N vRQbt"i . ' � I��� � �
aJ .. '�� + � ( �'� ..'
f �' � . � . 3 �� �j�
�'` � p �.�, � �sa. ��. � ��i�k .� n 1�1 si i .:, Nµ ,� i
' { . y,, �� ,/� ,�' � I � , �Ye r^� � � .
lhT '' 4 {io1 �tal�: i 4� li�� �gt��, r /? � ��--�}�,= 4 y + F �/
If � � �.6Y NaIrtS,p�"°. f n� CJ� s��� :'f . ' YPa � Y� . i . Jw$�
�F NT- . . a � "r :,Jr �tbdMr���{ �' I
.. y � , � ���.,� ' ,..�� �1�
� },..... ?'a,(� y��"`°'k, i 5 �{�;. ' ea N Cltx. Par R � y/ ;if'1 �'f0� 4 '��S'.�'.'�� v � ¢ f` � . � � °� _ r
� O f �.� i par�A-:�.' �i + < -.�I [{oni � r�ell r ,- �. � „ �,� � i � �t:1 /i °i �i r :. � o � f
rx i q� � �
1 �i . � �- . t Y R �! - ". J l .w � /'�I!� ! '�
':`.. \ �i f fia?++s,4 � �usv .¢� .� �f i �� ��; � ic/l "6 t / ` �( '+:-�� � � v �. 3 I � • ,�, � .
yntvotad �j r Un Sr�k" qi qC l'.o' �J i f L 4 ��"�� �'. j �� 1 i ; � t i a� ���C
tA��on , � � � �-; „<r,� . � � 7j]'p � �F p �l �:: I ib � / . 7s :-� �(� ��. ,
I� . a� ���� ~ 7 '.; � 4.C'7EK.,�,��+ ��j� � � I 1 ' y r � s J i � +�} �7q�* p �''t�
� 4 � �: � � : 4 YaUW 1( a P � h�.� Y . � � '�. � v 4 r � ! • 1 f4� <' �
ak:.x vS� , .. � � i , �` � aa �, � - -a� ' " , ��, a .1, , ' �' '„ �,
� � i 4se,�, �ye � � ' Y �� ��-r r �� e ` 1� � �'N u `�uk€ ; . � � .
., � y`� ., � � . :s� ���iH � , �, r ^'y' �r at o; �,a� d � � : a n J� - �„ ,/�,.m
0 � / T
� d F � SfH �
�>r °v r � � � ~ ��i��o,/ ' y . /
� � I � . i i � d . � �( . .a � y ,�� � *R 3 � �
C �U i .. �� �^Z . ; A � �sr i i ' c% � �f�' r� Y+tli .: 1� � „ . „„ �
-1 4Y Iy� � 'v,�j Q � � "� ar .. � f �i � � i �
p}�1NlM :, nY I.indbe 2!\� N���.� �'4r'�'t'S 'k !� .hn l C l-/ }: \ � .. � I �.
� + S ��, t ( � �. C � i . � �
Z ' ..'a ' � 0 ,�/. C` I h ` I G
�� � � i �: . � / r �'�W i hJ . � � '• lid� �t�tl � �l
�, ., 5( � " � . �o ` � ;� � } .r: G � �
� „ �t R 1 ra y �lr'�� _ - , r t .� : j i .; ` i .F
� S<h ! r
:: ... .:: � . ,
t� 5 s ...��: ... ' V'! � �FI xh r = 4"ra ��t.. :4 � d *- � � f F '� ,
<c .. t � $f . .0 � � ? � _.y rtufi ��e� i1�
' m F . � ,�p � � � y 17:,�
� .Li � �� � ' '
^. {
a
ra .., [ '� Q �% ��; Ij ;.:; Wei� .,.' fi , �`h��G . �v � � ,tyei 7\ ~ f +' 1;�
1$� '. f"!�� 4L ' I � ! y � � 1� .
O �. `
� � \ '" Q k�' �. 11�' �S �f I,n t�' Q ,�' � A
.. ir+c = �'�' r i �a � n � �j!'7i � � � . . i :� � _:
*�i - ! +I �'t '.,� r ��k �..., �� . I 1�YttPOII�}' . 71'C�Ptiv:: i � TI Ll �
� ,F' f yti � a4rena C �. /; >"'� kf �.: N 2a l . ,:
�'' . T +PO ir +F �< i.: � '��� � A � d'�'ibtwi[� � �� S f P .� a�tF t �
�Ak Ave �A%E �. yr ' r �r.l I / � 'ii b �� � i - a � !
A i �� , Pi8l4eafnd i .� �l•` �� _� � � �� i � y� � ��( � e�� �i ..
� � � p i . � , �'
,
i� .: �$K � � __E �r wP � ���� �� �� ��� . ����z� �; � 3 / l � I.: �- ^ �,
� �, I � � ' �' "� 'i �L.. -t:���,� � �E _ : �i ,.t. .. y �
1 �"1 . m .-�. .. i" �� � y "' �" - tation ; °y {� t'�•��;
� . .i)r ¢II i� r n� I' `r "°` I ..7` �
�.� Y
.1 �': 1 � � i, : i ' '�1 i i 7 � �� ' '�! n. .JI'„9'
;I ' -�- , , � � ����-' � °"
:
� � , '� .. 1 I , _
_
- � aV � ' I � 7 u ',. 1� 1� : : "`„ _'� a �'C+°� `i l��.
v
��u�. N � i ! :. � �4� , •' . �'•1..
� �� H.�u �h � � �'�. � � '�+h Ir� �t; � � � <'. � � � �,�..�
r � i ' k � � � �]� HiuL� 1�� � ` �i � 4� � Y
�' 9 � �l � �(' I
1 F _ M ^ � .Nsri � �..l�i �u7< < ftpo+ � 11 , y � 1{I � �.' �t v� n
S! I Cr nk»
��� '�n I e `ti � i�i �. i., li ° V . :A'� � 1�14 � w�
> �:�i m �: K, rflnun�l � '�' � u I � � � �' � , Y�
T '� ' � I I 1 �()5� �� :.. n R'V �'. �� V /� �. I � �� �. J) YF 1 . _ .• ..
`{� i � �Ai�n�M1 � y ��� � t I � q Ix i i� 1 � Nt i �l a ��/ � ,
�, f� 0�I' Ld i> C l��n jjY � �� �� � , 1 i I :� � ���� I r. �' � � �. .
4 S _il � . f Jt Si -�-„
r M��on SaP ii i� �� � N .� �! I �n f I��� �� Z �r' 1 i yew �_a t P x
a ry K��Pa� � �. 1 � I ,Ange,� gkbbpY �i .. ,:,-'� ,- BM d5 ��l � ��, � 0 ;� �
BLvn �'�� . i. �.Mnavot r'r,i i i i l brarY �6e � ara
I��� � � - � i �•�.G r - •1�� ' �� wy -5 � _: � �r�MYTn� �.i
a I \:. �a .i i i i' p .. '�7 ` „ ( I y + t:9M 6& r:�rr {#SS3+.�%
I r il .� �, � i b , m r �. � u i a 1� I� v1�� I i� r ..�ei T ry ( Si �tw��{i
{ � _ { ��" � _ -- < i_4� -1 � �rY- + .f'jy-Cl Xit. f W{H 9!Y �:
fi` � J M I � r ' � �F':� i � � �< Huh 1�F-� / �Tra ex .�
�: ,_.
O j � T r
6 , .. .... . ._ � . . , I �L.�I 1 I i .11 lI 1-'%.. "'cm . .i �Pi.,� .� � � .��
ATTACHIv1ENT 1