HomeMy Public PortalAbout09-08-87 PLANNING COMMISSION ;;r � ,.. � !�
i� / � �
A G E N D A I��y� I
cirv aF ��tri�:r.�� a
CITY CL�' �
sE� �- i�a�
LY�WOOD CITY PLANNIMG COMM�ISSION A4 � ����
`7 �
�
�
REGULAR MEETING - 7:30 P. M. � �/`'//":`'
LYN�d00D CITY HALL, 11330 BULLIS ROAD�,� '�
w � (`����
� �
�
September 8, 1987
LUCILLE KANKA
CHAIRPERSON
DONALD DOVE EUGEP�E RAYMOND
VICE-CHAIRPERSON COMMISSIONER
LENA COLE DENNIS ROBERT REID�
COMCfISSZONER COMMISSIONER
ROY PRYOR DAVID J, WILLIS, JR,
CO�PiISSIONER COMMISSIONER
CITY STAFF
DIREC?OR OF COt�.MUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNERS
VICENTE L. MAS ��� �SF�
Planner
COMMISSION COUNSEL mRETFiEA TILF�RD
Acting Senior Planner
HINRY S. BARBOSA
SEPTEMBER 8, 19$7
OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Call meeting to order.
B. Flag Salute.
C. Roll Call.
D. Introduction of Henry S. Barbosa, Esq.
New General Counsel
E. ° Certification of Agenda Posting by City Clerk.
F. Approval of Minutes: July 14, 1987 and August 11,
1987
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Special Permit for Dancina and Live Entertainment-Case No. 87056
11020 Atlantic Avenue (Oscar and Patricia Casillas)
Comments :
This applicant is requesting a Special Permit to add Dancing
and Entertainment at the existing restaurant and cocktail
lounge.
Recommended Action
Staff respectfully request that the Planning Commission
not open the public hearing and dismiss Case No. 87056 without
prejudice.
2. Special Permit for Dancina and Live Entertainment-Case No. 87059
12001 Atlantic Avenue (Irene Pena)
Comments
The applicant is requesting a 5pecial Permit for Dancing and
Live Entertainment at an existing cocktail lounqe, 12001
Atlantic Avenue, Lynwood, CA., in the CB-1 (Controlled
Business) zone.
Recommended Action
Staff respectfully request that the Planning Commission not
open the public hearing and dismiss Case No. 87059 without
prejudice.
V10:Agenda
1
3. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87057
12017 Atlantic Avenue (Leonel Vasquez)
Comments
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to operate a mini-market with off-sale alcoholic
beverages at 12017 Atlantic Avenue, Lynwood, CA.
Recommended Action
Staff respectfully requests that, the Planning Commission
not open the public hearing and continue Conditional Use
Permit Case No. 87057 to October 13, 1987. Staff has
received the revised site plans but did not have adequate
time to review them for the September 8 meeting.
4. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87060
3562 Beechwood Avenue (Maria Briseno)
Comments •
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to develop a two-story triplex at the rear of an
existing single family dwelling at 3562 Beechwood Avenue,
Lynwood, CA.
Recommended Action
Staff respectfully request that, the Planning Commission not
open the public hearing and continue Case No. 87060 to
October 13, 1987. Staff has received the revised site plans,
but was unable to review them for the September 8 meeting.
5. Tentative Parcel Map - Case No. 87051
3151-3153 Carlin Avenue (Cecilia Lobaton)
Comments
The applicant is requesting Tentative Parcel Map approval
for the purpose of consolidating four (4) separate parcels
into one parcel, in order to build fourteen (14) apartment
units at 3151-3153 Carlin Avenue, Lynwood, CA.
Recommended Action
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2141:
1. Finding that Tentative Parcel Map No. 18957, Case ,
No. 87051, will not have a significant effect on
the environment, as a Negative Declaration has been
certified as adequate on July 14, 1987.
2. Approving Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 87051,
subject to the stated conditions and requirements.
V10:AGENDA
2
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS:
6. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87044
10115-10211 Long Beach Boulevard (ROger Alvarado)
Comments•
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to operate a bona fide restaurant with beer and wine
at 10115-10211 Long Beach Boulevard, Lynwood, CA.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2125:
1. Finding that Conditional Use Permit, Case No.
87044, is categorically exempt from the
provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as
amended (Section 15303, Class 3)
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 87044,
subject to the stated conditions and requirements.
�
7. Tentative Parcel Map - Case No. 87053
11339-11341 Louise Avenue (Donald Kittle)
Comments•
The applicant is requesting Tentative Parcel Map approval to
merge two lots into one parcel, in order to construct 14
apartment units.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully request that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2136:
1. Finding that Tentative Parcel Map No. 18893, Case No.
87053, is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines, as amended (Section 15061 b 3)
2. Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 87053, subject to
the stated conditions and requirements.
7a. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87053
11339-11341 Louise Avenue (Donald Kittle
Comments •
This is an application for a Conditional Use Permit to build
fourteen (14) apartment units, with the required parking and
open space, in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone.
V10:nupubhrg
3
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully request that the Planning Commission
adopt the attached Resolution No. 2132:
1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No.
87053, will not have a significant effect on the
environment and certifying the Negative Declaration as
adequate.
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 87053, subject to
the stated conditions and requirements.
8. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87064
12502 Harris Avenue (Rafael Zapien)
Comments•
This is an application for a Conditional Use Permit to
construct two, two-bedroom apartment units, with the required
parking and open space, at the rear of an existing dwelling
unit.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2143:
1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 87064,
is categorically exempt for the provisions of the State
CEQA Guidelines, as amended.
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 87064, subject to
the state conditions and requirements.
9. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87067
11217 Wright Road (Frank Ortiz)
Comments :
This is an application for a Conditional Use Permit in order
to construct four (4) apartments units, with the required
parking and open space, in the R-3 (Multi-Family
Residential) zone.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planninq Commission,,adopt the attached Resolution No. 2146:
1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No.
87067, is categorically exempt from the provisions of
the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended (Section 15303,
Class 3)
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 87067,
subject to the stated conditions and requirements.
V10:nupubhrg
4
10. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87071
11186 Carson Drive (William Flores)
Comments•
This is an application for a Conditional Use Permit to build
a duplex, with the required parking and open space, in the
R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consider, the
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2147:
1. Finding that Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 87071,
will not have a significant effect on the environment.
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 87071, subject to
the stated conditions and requirements.
11. Zonina Ordinance Amendment - Case No. 87075
Comments•
This is a proposed amendment to Chapter 25, the Official
Zoning Ordinance, with respect to the minimum distance
between principal buildings and accessory buildings in all
residential zones.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully request that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2149:
1. Finding that the proposal is exempt from the provisions
of the State CEQA Guidelines (Section 15061 b 3).
2. Recommending that the City Council approve the Findings
in Resolution No. 2149, waive reading and introduce the
proposed ordinance.
12. Zonina Ordinance Amendment - Case No. 87076
Comments:
This is a proposed amendment to Chapter 25, the official
Zoning Ordinance, with respect to prohibiting above-ground
storage of flammable and combustible liquids within the
city.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully request that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2150:
V10:nupubhrg
5
1. Finding that the proposal is exempt from the provisions
of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended (Section 15061
b 3).
2. Recommending that the City Council approve the Findings
in Resolution No. 2150, waive reading and introduce
the ordinance.
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS:
Proposed Study Session on Development in the R-2 and R-3 zones
Comments :
On July 14, 1987, the Planning Commission directed staff to
schedule a special study session to evaluate the present trend of
development activity in the R-2 and R-3 zones, and the resulting
perceived impact in traffic and parking congestion, overtaxing of
utilities and school overcrowding.
Staff suggests that the Planning Commission schedule the study
session for Tuesday, 5eptember 29, 1987, at 7:30 p.m., in the
City Hall Council Chambers.
Staff further recommends that the Planning Commission provide
further direction on the specific areas of concern to be
addressed at the study session and the format to be followed.
STAFF COMMENTS
Participation in UCLA Extension Course -- Practical Approaches to
Preparing and Revising a General Plan.
Comments:
The UCLA Extension Program is conducting a planning course
focused on the technical approaches to the preparation or
revision of the General Plan (COpy of brochure attached).
In view of the impending revision/update of the Lynwood General
Plan, the Planning Commissioners are encouraged to participate in
the referenced course. Those Commissioners wishing to attend the
course should contact Dorethea Tilford, Acting Senior Planner, on
or before Thursday, September 10, 1987, at (213) 603-0220,
Extension 288 for the necessary arrangements.
COMMISSION ORALS:
PUBLIC ORALS:
(Information Items Only)
ADJOURNMENT:
Adjourn to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission
on October 13, 1987, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall Council
Chambers, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California.
V10:nupubhrg
6
!'�'��, ;-ii ��7� l�io._� . .
�^ T"">Y
r � ti �- `".1;. (� � -.. ..
DATE: Septembr•r $, 158i l+;'iJl_ t't�.}. ��(i'��
T0: PI,ANNING COi1yIS8I0N
FRO`I: Vi.cente L. `las, Director
Communit,y D Departnent
SUBJECT: Special. Permit fur Dancing �and Live EnterC�inment
Case iv'o. 8i 059
applicant: Irene Pena
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requestiu� a Spc:cial PermiC to allow Dancing �ind
Live F.�itertainment at ari e�isting coul, lour�ge, 12001. AClant;ic.
Avenue, Lynwood, CA., in thr CB-1 (Controlled-I�usiness) cone.
FACTS
° 1. 9t its regular meeting of July 30, 1987, the Site� P1.an
Review Committee requested that the applicant suUmit another
sii:e pl.an, because the a1.1ey sai].1. Ue vacatc>d. The a1:Lep was
� the only acceas to the parlcing area for �Che pr.oposed usa.
The i�evised site plan
2. On August 17, 1987, tl��e Plannin� Comm.issi.o�i continu�d tl��is
case to its regular meeting uf Sept.emL 8, 19£,7. However,
the applicant has not sul��mitted the requi.red doi�wnents to
the Plar',ning Di�-isi.oti.
RT:C.OMM]iNDATION
Staff rrspectfull} requests th�.�t the Planning Commission r�ct
open i;he Fublic Heax•ing and clismise C�se Nu. 8i059 without.
prejudi.ce.
Dislc 11-1:87059sp
, ,. „ { � r, e ., 3
� � . � . .�.
7 4 5 7�
' DATE: September 8, 1987
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Dept.
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-No. 87057
Applicant: Leonel Vasquez
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to rebuild a
mini-market which has off-sale alcoholic beverages at 12017
Atlantic Avenue, Lynwood, CA.
FACTS
1. At its regular meeting of July 30. 1987, the Site Plan Review
Committee requested that the applicant submit another site
plan, because the lot dimensions on the plan were inaccurate.
Also, the parking had to be redesigned so that cars would not
exit by backing into.the street.
' 2. On August 11, 1987, the Planning Commission continued this
matter to its regular meeting of September 8, 1987, since the
applicant had not submitted the revised site plan. On August
26, 1987, the revised site plan was submitted to the Planning
Division, but staff did not have sufficient time to review it
for the Planning Commission meeting of September 8.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests that the Planning Commission not
open the public hearing and continue this matter to the next
regular meeting of the Planning Commission on October 13,
1987.
�
i
i
,�
I
� D-9-1:87057ctd
i
�
1
�
I
. . n t'�_'0.,.�8 r �� �. �-
� � '. i � : _ ��. .�'i . � � '
j� � . . :' `�i I . . � �
� � 1
,�, , . " ;;1 _ _ ._ . _._
DATE: September 8, 1987
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 87060
Applicant: Maria Briseno
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit �
to develop a two-story triplex at the rear of an existing single
family dwelling at 3562 Beechwood Avenue, Lynwood, CA.
FACTS
1. At its regular meeting of July 30, 1987, the Site Plan
Review Committee requested that the applicant submit a
revised site plan due to the incorrect dimensions and
measurements. Due to an inconsistency in our noticing
procedures, the legal notice was published prior to Site
Plan Review; thereby, requiring that the case be agendized
at this time.
2. At its regular meeting of August 11, 1987, Staff requested
the Planning Commission continue this item in order for the
applicant to submit a revised site plan.
On August 26, 1987, staff received the revised site plan
from the architect. However, staff was unable to review the
plans in time for the September 8 meeting of the Planning
Commission.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests the Planning Commission not open
the public hearing and continue this matter to the next
regular meeting of the Planning Commission on October 13,
1987.
I
I
i
�
I
i
�
i D-9-1:87060cup
i
�
I
.
� 87051TPM
DATE: September $, �98� AGENDA ITEM N0. 5
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION CASE N0 . - V 7 D5, �
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Dept.
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 18957--CASE NO. 87051
Applicant: Cecilia Lobaton
PROPOSAL:
The applicant is requesting Tentative Parcel Map approval for the
purpose of consolidating four (4) parcels into one, in order to
build fourteen (14) apartments at 3151-3153 Carlin Avenue,
Lynwood, CA.
This matter was continued from the August 11, 1987 Planning
Commission.
FACTS:
1. Source of Authority.
Section 25-18, et seq., Subdivision Requlations of the
Lynwood Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act,
Government Code Section 66410, et seq.
2. Property Location.
The subject property is located on the north side of Carlin
Avenue between Peach Street and Alpine Avenue. (Refer to
attached Location Map).
3. Property Size.
The site area is approximately 30,225 square feet.
4. Existing Land Use.
The site is vacant. The surrounding land uses are as follows:
North - Multi-Family East - Multi-Family
South - Multi-Family West - Multi-Family
5. Land Use Designation.
The General Plan designation for the property is Multi-
Family Residential; the zoning classification is R-3
(Multi-Family Residential).
The surrounding land use designations are as follows:
General Plan: Zoning:
North - Multi-Family R-3
South - Multi-Family R-3
East - Multi-Family R-3
West - Multi-Family R-3
6. Site Plan Review.
The map was reviewed by the Site Plan Review Committee at
its regular meeting on July 30, 1987, and the Committee
recommends Planning Commission approval subject to
conditions.
D-9-1: 87051TPM
�R
7. Public Response
The Lynwood Unified School District has notified the
Community Development Department that the school located in
the school attendance Area in which this development is
proposed, is currently overhoused. New enrollies, due to
proposed residential development will be attending Hosler
Junior High School and Lynwood High School; both of which
are experiencing severe overcrowded conditions.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS
1. Environmental Assessment.
The Community Development Department has determined that the
project could not have a significant effect on the
environment, and a Negative Declaration has been prepared.
The Negative Declaration was certified as adequate by the
Planning Commission at its regular meeting of July 14, 1987,
in accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended,
(Section 15073).
2. Staff analysis of this proposed lot consolidation includes
the following findings: (a) Design of the proposed site; and
, (b) Consistency of the proposed site with the General Plan.
Design of the proposed site consolidation
a. The design of the proposed lot consolidation shows the
consolidated lots to be in character with existing
residential developments in the area.
b. The proposed lot consolidation request consists of
four (4) lots to be joined together for the purpose of
constructing fourteen (14) apartments, thereby allowing
better utilization of residentially-zoned vacant lots.
c. The site is physically suitable for the type and
proposed density of the development, in that the
parcels are substantially flat and able to support the
type of development proposed.
Consistency of the site with the General Plan
a. Staff's inspection shows the site to be compatible with
the City of Lynwood's General Plan that limits land
use .activities to projects that enhance the function
and quality of residential developments and that do not
significantly alter the character of the existing
' environment.
b. The size and location of the proposed project does not
significantly change the character of the existing
" environment.
c. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the
objectives, policies, and land use specified in the
General Plan, in that the General Plan designates this
area as Multiple Family Residential and the proposed
development is consistent with this designation.
D-9-1:87051tpm
RECOMMENDATION(S):
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2141:
1. Finding that Tentative Parcel Map No. 18957, Case No.
87051, will not have a significant effect on the
environment, as a Negative Declaration has been
certified as adequate on July 14, 1987.
2. Approving Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 87051, subject
to the stated conditions and requirements.
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Tentative Parcel Map
3. Resolution No. 2141
D-9-1:87051TPM
87051TPM
RESOLUTION NO. 2141
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 18957 TO
COMBINE LOTS 1, 2, 3, AND 4, BLK. 14, BELLE-VERNON
ACRES, M-B 9-196, BEING A REVERSION TO ACREAGE OF PARCEL
MAP 13252 PER MAP RECORDED.IN BOOK 49, PAGE 38, IN THE
OFFICE OF TfiE LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER, CITY OF
LYNWOOD, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject
application; and
wHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered
all pertinent testimony offered in the case as presented at the
public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the preparation, filing and recordation of a
Parcel Map is required for the proposed residential development;
and
Section 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that said Tentative Parcel Map No. 18957 should be
approved for the following reasons:
A. The combination of lots meets all the applicable
requirements and conditions imposed by the State
Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations
of the Lynwood Municipal Code.
B. The proposed combination of lots is consistent with
the applicable elements of the General Plan and the
Official Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lynwood.
C. Proper and reasonable provisions have been made for
adequate ingress and egress to the lots being
combined.
D. Proper and adequate provisions have been made for all
public utilities and public services, including
sewers.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 18957 in the R-3
(Multi-Family Residential) zone, subject to the following
conditions:
D-9-1:Reso2141
Community Development Department Conditions
1. The requirements of all other City Departments shall be met.
2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement
of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands and
agrees to the condition of this resolution within fifteen
(15) days from the date of adoption of said resolution by
Planning Commission.
No grading or building permits will be issued until
recordation of the final map.
Planning Division Conditions
3. Within twenty-four (24) months after approval or conditional
approval of Tentative Parcel Map, the subdivider shall file
with the City of Lynwood, a Final Parcel Map in substantial
conformance with the Tentative Parcel Map as approved or
conditionally approved, and in conformance with the
Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the
City of Lynwood.
However, no grading permit or building permit shall be
issued prior to recordation of the final map with the
� office of the Los Angeles County Recorder.
4. Prior to the expiration of the Tentative Parcel Map, the
subdivider may file an application with the Community
Development Department for Planning Commission action on an
extension of the expiration period.
5. The Final Parcel Map shall be filed with the City Engineer
of the City of Lynwood.
Public Works Department Conditions
6. Al1 conditions of the State Map Act and the City's Subdivision
Ordinance must be met prior to recordation with the County
Recorder.
All matters and improvements shall be consistent with the
ordinances, standards, and procedures of the City's Development
Standards, Engineering Procedures and Standards, Water Standards
and Planting Standards of the Department of Parks and
Recreation.
The Developer is responsible for checking with staff for
clarification of these requirements.
7. Submit a Subdivision Guarantee to this office.
The final map shall be based on a field survey. All surveying
for the proposed development will be done by the Developer,
including the establishment of centerline ties. Enclose with
the final map the surveyor's closure sheets.
8. Developer shall pay all applicable development fees including
drainage, sewer, water and parkway trees prior to issuance of
any building permits.
Pay Parcel Map checking fees prior to checking.
Pay $100 monument checking fee prior to recordation.
Deposit $50 with City Engineer to guarantee receipt by City of
recorded, reproducible mylar, parcel map prior to recordation.
All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees
are to be paid prior to recording the final map. All
requirements for the serving utilities to be met or guaranteed
prior to recording of the final map.
9. Public Improvements:
The Developer shall install all public improvements, as required
by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer prior to issuance
of any occupancy permits for this development. Public
improvements shall include, but not be limited to:
Paving, curb and gutter, spandrels, concrete drive
approaches, sidewalks, street lights, sanitary sewers, storm
drains, water system, underground utility installations,
railroad crossing control devices, signs and markings and
street trees. All changes and repairs in existing curbs,
gutters and sidewalks and other public improvements shall be
paid for by the developer. If improvements are to be
guaranteed, a faithful performance bond shall be posted by
the developer to guarantee installation of said public
improvements and an aqreement for completion of improvements
with the City Council shall be entered into. Submit Policy
of Insurance or bond protecting City against damage or
injury to persons or property growing out of, related to, or
resulting from improvements or work. The Director of Public
Works/City Engineer will determine amount and form. Deposit
with the Director of Public Works/City Engineer before
commencing any improvements, a sum estimated by the Director
of Public Works/City Engineer to cover cost of inspection of
all improvements under his jurisdiction.
Reconstruct damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter and required
adjacent pavement along Carlin Avenue. Close existing drive
approach and construct the proposed drive approaches per
City of Lynwood standards. Underground all utilities,
construct four (4) wheelchair ramps at corners of Carlin
Avenue and Peach Street. Relocate existing power pole in
conflict with the proposed drive approach, install one (1)
marbelite street light pole with underground services and
conduits on south side of Carlin Avenue, plant one (1)
parkway tree; size, type of species and location to be
determined by Department of Public works. Remove two (2)
trees in conflict with the proposed drive approach and
replace them with two (2) trees; size, type of species and
location to be determined by the Department of Public Works.
10. Grading And Draining
A grading plan shall be submitted for the approval of the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer and the Director of
Community Development. The grading plan shall include the
topography of all contiguous properties and streets and shall
provide for the methods of drainage in accordance with all
applicable City standards. Retaininq walls and other
protective measures may be required. Offsite drainage
easements may be necessary.
The structural section of all parking areas shall be
designed by a civil engineer based upon soils analysis
supplied by a recognized and approved soils engineering
firm. The structural section shall be approved by the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer. In the event that
the design is not provided, the minimum structural section
that will be approved by the Director of Public Works/City
Engineer would be 2 inches of asphalt on 4 inches on
untreated rock base.
Submit to this office a Geologic/Soils Report signed by a
Registered Soils Engineer.
11. Sewers
Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected
separately to the main sewer line. It may be advantageous
to construct an 8 inch sewer main line into the property.
Design of all sanitary sewers shall be approved by the
Director of Public Works/City Enqineer.
- 12. WdteY SyStemS
The.developer shall construct a water system including water
services, fire hydrants and appurtenances through the
development as required by the Director of Public Works/City
Engineer. The developer shall submit a water system plan to
the City of Lynwood Fire Department for fire hydrant
locations. The City will install water meters only.
Payment for said meters shall be made to the City prior to
issuance of building permits. The developer shall install
on-site water facilities including stubs for water meters
and fire hydrants on interior and on boundary arterial streets.
All conditions of the Lynwood Fire Department must be met
prior to recordation.
13. Public Easements and Right-Of-Way
Where drainage, sewer and other such easements are required,
the minimum easement width shall be ten (10) feet to
facilitate maintenance unless otherwise approved by the
. Director of Public Works/City Enqineer.
14. Sidwalks:
Design, configuration and locations shall be subject to the
approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, and
the Director of Community Development. Ramps for physically .
handicapped persons shall be provided both on-site and off-
site as required by State and local regulations.
15. Dust Control and Pedestrian Safety:
Prior to the issuance.of demolition or grading permits, the
developer shall:
a. Submit a plan indicating safety methods to be.provided
to maintain safe pedestrian ways around all areas of
construction. This may require proper and adequate .
signs, fences, barricades, or other approved control
devices as required by the Director of Public Works/
City Engineer and the Director of Community Development.
Section 3. Staff has determined that Tentative Parcel
Map No. 18957 could not have a significant effect on the
environment, and a Negative Declaration has been prepared.
Section 4. A copy of this Resolution shall be delivered to
the applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 1987, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
Community Development Dept. General Counsel
D-4-1:V2�.540
V Y
� � � � � ^ � � � � � � . .
�
.• E J` O i � �„' �''' a V
���V .et• Jf� 1 c � � � M R' M � iiE? o W
. , , . � .. �. � . �� � \� �. � l � ,. . � . ` � ° t .
M � z'
, , . ... ^ w < -a;; '"'?. �:lK-� e�:.� , ro �,, �,,�, _�.�,�. � � � �ar
- , " ro ♦.i
.f�r.�.:. �._� i
. � \ r' M � + �9 � ¢� ' � \ La a} 3—:° ' BL
._ r a , � � , a ,
�so Z 9_ �� i�. � ; 1r . � �, na . , r �9 s •� •"����;
� �r I . �¢
� w � h .--: ...4 <- : �.. .. . ♦.. -. , . �,s
� . _ . . . . 1 1 1 . 1 .. � .." . . i .. 3 li Y' �-�� .
iv „
W �; � � 1 � 1 � 1• � , i �73�1R ��.
' e � / 3 , j � p , ^„ ' �.c r� sr � v�� , 1 . q ° _v!S_ o � `3.
� d "� ir.c - o Z� o �/" /73,j�
� gp vr.� a o�j 2B (73J� o �QZL
. � o �o � �, �16 � ia4[ � e . i.73
. L� � r' ' b T1 g o 1 i1 @ o
�za3° S W�� �`^ 0�9 ?�_� r ` 1i. M 19L;(� �3�es !
. i � J ` �'- � 1��0_, � '
0
- (1�'�`� r a � g4�9 � � i� v 1_°�• co • �/ 'de,'af�jt.', Cq,�
. � .�� H�/0�� /' 1 v d ��� M M r � �'V � G n
N '� � � M
M
, ^h�J�'/� � �I '9 e 1 �• '� � :
t a ro� � »� NUE
... ° 340� ' °�" rJ �� 17 � �ls� I�✓E � eo� o/o)S
/3l- c a �. ` r:c - v ��1 R ,g�kio� ^,a, � �
1'� M �:.s s � p 1 0 l o M o
r �d,� J�''� B o do� m �rc , ' �` 1(� � �ei
o/�J6' � 1 � i ro M 1 � ; � / a,�Yieo o a �� �e.
`^ ,r� �„ K " Y�Y
L!N �a � ° �� � " t � � ? / s '°7'
CAR ;� � �;�� � z a " ..
- . ° � . 1 „ cn � !'�� . M 7j � 1� I3 ,�' 1 � /dY73,� �x �
'.. � '' 47� � . yol � �9 Z -�aL_ ` `�l^:
. ��v_o_� 1 13f ��o �S �� g 1 1•
� � � � � b � *'
.. 340 y � g �/ 1„ ^ (p � 1 ¢
'- _ Z; � : ., � k� ,i /�S�/ �
iS .
" 4/ Y . °' ` ' i os J,u _ � .,,
1? „ �O / ,,• z -
ayab 3 �y�6 iass �so�� `�in&�:
. - � / t e�. � . � � �, ' /a S�/ � � �
.. � . � o _!/OG. ,_ �
. . � .a(< 6 1 M h ti�i�
- � �ay � � p � ` �t .� i�sl '\ � .
V ia0' �/ '� . �
^ � , 1 3� � 2"' iaSa3 ""
� ¢� �
� /7y3 b� l zo ? - i , y � o° W .
' ,� ' ioo . � '° . cr� � 2 ,9 ��"ae
. . 1 /Z �'i � J a \ ° I �` �
/�Y`/6 6 �oa �a � � �^ r�� �, ��fo � e ��M�a
��• � 0. c3 t " > �' yri " ro , o'� w.e i,K"
' . � . � � �1 � , i , r �V � � a `.a`., � ro � � �:� �rc NUE $ ,v e,•v,�wEUCL/O
AVE ,.�, o. ,<. �,o. se
� �. 1 1 ' c� � �=t1 /. Cp �� 1xs ��� o .v e.r vw
, � 0 1 8 �� �� � J o� � � y� � �
a o. a�i �i/ ^5 ;� h e
• � 1 1 � K { //II )
1 n+ '
_ e y � � J O � M p � „ � ^ ' iill ///J //Ii
� � V EUCLID � . � M o ` � M m �u :'+ ,� o � • �
� � i oo ° �7 1'� y� �� M e Z/ R �� , x `
� i dJfo� � o�ca \ w. ' ' /9 .^ =n , n
� 90 dv�� a`" a "' � ,3 ' �� " ,
�y = 9 � "
m „ i��J -9 �
8 Q
�' ia , eti . � j2 �..
� „
t h „ ,
� � ' „.
x � M �.. T ,. �.
� � o'� �vd8„ 3 3 �' y 5 �f �:. � sT'
O
im
� _-~
' CASE NO. U7D.��
.� i� �., I ' . .-' ._ '
- �
�,�;�► �D,� lTEM NO'. � � ��=� �'
C� i�1�. �Z�`��, '�,
UATE: Sept,emUer 8, 198i
1`0: PLA\NIA'G I;OMMISS]:U\'
HROM: Vicent.e L. Pias, G:ir�-ctor
Community Deve,alupmenC l�el�artment •
SliBJECT: Conditiunal Use_Perrni_t_- Ca�.e No. 8iO44
Applicant: Fogei Alvai•ado
PROPOSAL
The applicant i.s requestring approval of' a Condi.tional Use Permit
to alloia a bunafide re5taurant caith beer and wine at a 5,89i
sq�are foot buildin� ].ocated at 1011i;-1021] L,ong Beach IS1vd.
F4CT5
1. Source o£ Authoritv
- -8.8 of the� Lvnwood 7.,oniri Ordinance recuires Cl��st
Section 25 , g t I
u Conditional lise Permit Le first oUtain to uunducY, a �
bonafide re�Caurant �ai.th associated sale of alcoholic ,
beverages. �
2. Propc:rtv Location. i
I
The subject property is 10115-10211 Long Iteucn Blvd. between �
?7ichigan and Wiscunsin Avenues a�;d located or� the west side I
of I,ong Beach B1vfl. IR.efer to �ttached t,ocati.on `tap.) �
3. Property Size. I
The sub.ject propert3� is i_rreguLnr i.n sha��e and is '
�ppro�imately 38,395 �quar�: Peet, in area.
�k. Existing Land Use and Sui•rounding i
'Che bni.lding is presentlp ��acant. The surrounding land uses �
are as follocas: �
f
�
North - Commerci.al F3rast - Commercial. ;
South - Commercial <<'rst - Resi3ential (South GateJ
5. Land Use Descriution:. I
The General Pian descri.ption for tlie subje:et is Commercail �
while the zoni�z� desi'gnaCion is C-3. Tlie surroundiug lacia �
nse designations a��e as follows: �
General Pl.ari '7..uniiig !
i
North - Commerci.a.l North - C-3 �
South - Commerci.al. 5outh - C-3 �
East - Commercial F'ast - C-3
West - Residential West - R(South Gate) '�
6. Project Characte•ristii:s. �
i
The applicant `'proposes tp upgrade the eKisting site b5 �
removing the sl�ed and buildi.ng uitensi.un, as i�e1:1 as the �
single famil�r residencc cur�°eritly oucupying tlie area oi' the �
northern parlc.i.rig 1o�C._�The applicant wi.11 be sercin� bee*° and �
wir�e in corijur�ction w.iCh ('000d servii;e. 7`here arc no o�hei j
f
i
r
�
liquor esCablishments witl�in a 300' ra�lius of the .site. In
the first: twu ('L) moriths uf Lhi.s pe:ar there c�ei�e iiine (5)
' reported inatances uf ur.ime; cangit�g frum ruUberie.s to
asault wi.tik�i u dead].�° �.�eapa�n.
i . Site Plrin Rev:ieia
AC i_ts r��gulac� ine��ti.ng on .aiigtisl:` 27, 1987, approved tFie
projao�t, subjcct Y,o conclitiions a�id ri:quirements sLated
herein. The I)irector granted a 63� parlc�ing space adjustment
ISee item 2 Leloia)..
8. Zonin� Enforcemerit HisCo�rr.
None on recurd.
9. Pul,l.ic Response.
'Phe Sheriff's Department hr�s �ubmi.tted a writte❑ statement
oUjzcting to the proposed utie uf al.coholic beveraoes
IAttachment No. 1).
ANAI.,}'SIS and COA'CLUSIOV �
1. Consistenc�� with 7_onine O
i
Section 25-8.8 of tl�e Zonin� Ordi�iaiice requires that �
Condi_t.ional Usi, Permit m�st Ue obtai.ned for an�- bonaP.ide
restaurant serving alcohol.ic. bevei°ages. The subject ��ropc�r�Cy
was a pre-etisti.ng ,business c.i.th sziles of l��{cei�y gouds and
delicatessen and a].coholi.c bevecage:s (l,eer and ivine). 1'he
si.Ce }ias been vaca��t for appi-oximately three (3) years. Ttie
use is cons:i5tant w:i.th t;he use5 permitted. in th.is zoning
di.stri_ct and wou7.d continue the same type of use that; had I
been eai.sting iri tlre past. �
2. Site Suitsbilit.v.
The propert:y i.s located on an irregularly�-shaped lot �
currently occiai�ied b,y tlte laz-ger building ar�d assor•ted �
outbuildi.ngs includinj a single-fami.ly residenti.al. struuture. I
The accessory buil.d.in�s would be removed pursuant to the
attached plans to mal:e caay foi' the required number of
� parking,spaces. � � �
In addi.Cion to the Condit.i.onal Use Permit, the applicant is I
requesting ai� adjust;me:n�t to the ret�uired niamber oP parkirig �
spaces. The cod.e requi.remenC t'oc t;he �it:e is 7G parlcing �
spaces, the applicant is prov9.ding 68 spaces wh.ich is a i
red�.iction of G% Prom t:hose r.equi.red. Code Section 25.--30.1
permii;s up to a 70% ceducCic�n wii:h the approv�il of the
Director of Planni.ng. I
3. CompatiUili.tc. I
The pruposed deveLopment continues the i�etail st;rip
I
development alon� Long Beach B:Lvd. In addit:i.on it caill �
abai:e a currnetly unsightl.y condition and improve the �
retail/commercial area. Therefure, t:he project will be �
compaT,i.ble witli tlie d�,velopment i.n the area.
i
�. Comnliance w:i_th DeveloUn1erit St.andards �
r
' The proposed sub'jec� nieets all of the. development standar3s '
required b,y the Zonin� Ordinance with respect to front, �
s:ide, and rear-��ard setbacks; distance between strUUtures; i
lot co�er�ge; open_space and landscaping; building I�ei.ght; �
� unit size and density. Ya�:king, however, would require an
�
�
� I
adjustment aotie>n i;o reduce the: rec{uired number of spaces by
' 9/ (;6 spaues req�iire�l; 6i sp3ces I�ro�idedl. 'Phe Code
" permits a minor adjustment to the: parhi.n� uode requ'i.rements
oP up tu 10% ��ithout the nci:d to obCain a�'tiriancc.
5. Conditi.ons of Apt�ro�'a1.
The i.mprocemenCs as proposed, subject i;o thi: �:onditi.ons
recomniet�de�i b,y tlle S.ite Plaii Recir:w Cuimnittee, wil:l. not have
a negaCi.ve effect oi� thc values of the surrounding.
properties or ii�terFere with ur endan�er the pulilic k�ealth,
saletp or welPare.
6. Benefits to Cominuriity�.
The proposed devc-:lopmenC �,ill. aid i_n aesthetical]y i.mpruvir�g
the neio}lborhood by upgr�di�ig the.vacant bui.lding. It i�.ill
directlp oontr.ibute to t;hc valurs of the surrvw'�ding
pruperties. Thereliy el.i.iuinating an �nsightly use.
i. En��ironmenta]. Assessmerrt
The Communitt� Developinent Department has dei:ermiiied thaC the
propusal is categori�al].,v ese.mpt from the provisions of the
State CEQ:1 Guidelines, as amei�ded, sect:ion 1b303, C'lass 3.
RECODiMEK`DATION
Staff respectful]y requests Lhat afCer consi.deiations the
Plannin� Commission adopt. Resolution No. 2125
1. Finding that Conditiona]. Use Yermit, Case [vo. 87044, .is
cate�oricall,y exempt frum the pruvisions of the State
CE(;A Guidr:tines, as ame�nded (Section 15303, !"lass 3).
2. Approviri� Concti�tiona.l Use Permit, Case No. SiO44,
subject to Lhe stated condi.t:ions and recluirements.
I
I
�
D�S� 15: 3 ;o4a�Up �
�
�
�
�
i
�
I
I
f
�
�
. '
I
I
�
_ f
8704-�
RESOLUTIOV N0. 21'L5
A RESOLU'1'TON OF 'CHE Y.LANA'�ING CO?I`IISSION OF
THE CI'PY OF LY�I�'OOD APFROVIA'G A
CONDITIO�'AL USE PLR.`II1' 'PU ALI�OW TfIE
CONSTRUCTION A�D OPF.RATION OF A BONAI'IDE
RES'PAUR.Ai�'T 1U116-L0211 LUNG BEACH BLVD.
LEGALLY DESCRIE3F.D AS C,OTS 120-124 AND A
PORTION OF LO'P 126, TRACT V0. 493G,
LYNti400D .
WHERAS, a Conditional Use Permit is requ.ired to
est:aUlish a bonafide eating establ:ishment with the on-sale of
beer and winiie;
WHERAS, the Plann.i.ng Commission of the City of
Lvnwood, after gi��ino notice thereof as required b,y law, did, on
Sepi,en�ber 8, 1987, hold. a publi.c hearing on the application of
Roger alvarado to remodel an existing building fox• i.se as a
resi;aurant at the aUove-descri_bed lot in the C-3 zone;
Section 1 . The Planning Commi.ssion hereL finds and
determine that Coniditiona]. Use Permi.t case no. 8704�1 should Ue
appc•oved for the fO�.1OW127g reasoiis:
1. ThaC the site fur the intended use is adeyuate in size and
shape, and is pruperl,y zoned to accommodate said use;
2. That there will be no ad��erse effect on r.iUutting property or
improvements in the vicini.ty, as consideration has been
given to adjacent prupertics i.n the design of the proposed I
project;
3. That the grariti.ng of sai.d. permit will not be contrai•y to, or. i
adversely affect, the General Plan of the City, as the
sub,ject propert,v is desi.onated for commerc:ial purposes; �
4. That the minimum requiremen�s necessarg to protect the
health and saPety oF the community shall be inet; (
Section 2. The Planning Comrnission of the Ci.t,y of �
Lyn�aood, �pproves ,a Conditional Use P�rmit to remodel an �
existing build:ing fot use as rx Uunafide restaurant wi_t;h on-sal.e �
b�rer and wine, subject to t.he:�foll.owing conditions: �
Commutiii;�� Develoumerit De»artmeni. Conditions �
1. The applicant shall meet the requirement:s of al]. other City '
Departments. �
2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement �
oP Acceptance stat.ing t,}iat he/she has read, understands, and ,
agrees to thE-� conditi.ons of thi.s resoluti_on within fifteen
(15) days from the date of approval. of saicl resolution by �
the Planni.ng C".onunmi.ssi.on. �
I
�
Piannin� D'i_vision Condi{.ions �
�
3. A masonry� wal.l of six feet (6') in height shall be ;
constructed around tlie parliino area of such establishments I
r,lien said area is adjacent to properties zoned or used for
resident;ial purposes; f
I
�
I
4. Th� noise le�-e.1s geixerated lii the operat,ion of such
estab:Lishment 5ha11 i�ot escecd 60 dba on adjoi.ni.ng
properti.e:s zonecl or u5ed for resi.dentia:l purposes;
5. E�terior lighl;ing of Llir> parlci.ng area shal.l be ltept �at an
intensity- of between one (11 ar�d (2) foot candles, so as to
provide adequaCe lighti.ng for patcons wl�ile not disturbing
surrounding residentia.l or commer�. areas.
'. 6. A mi��imum of Cifty-one p�-�rrent (51%) of restaursnt;s ,ross
rece>_:i.pts shal.] be from fooa sales to the accounCing
DeparCment of City� of Ly�iwood, one year afi:er apl�roval of
the Conditiona]. Use Fermi.t b�� t.he Planni_ng Comm.ission.
i. All ezisting signage sha].1 be remuaed. Ne�a s.i>na�e sha].1
comply with the sign ord:inai�ce oP i:lie Cit,y of Lynwood.
8. That a mini.mum of 6i parlcino spaces be ma.intainerl for the
sule use of' th� tenants un this �ite, pursuant to a parking
, adjustmenL issued caith Che I.'olLocain� fi.ndi.ngs: i
a. The ;tri.ct or l.:iteral interpx•etation and ,enforcemeiit
of' Y.he spec;i_fic i:egu].ati.on caoulcl result in pr•;icti.cal I
diffi.cult�- or ur�ne�cessary ph,ys:ical hardship
inr_ons:istent wit�J�i �P,he objer.tives of tl��is cl�upter.
U. 1'hat: there are esceptional or e�l;raordinar,y �
ci.rewiistances o�• condit�i.ons app].:icable to tY�e propertq �
involved wl�ich do not: a.ppl,y generally to other
properti.es in the same rone. �
<:. ThaY, the� grant:i.iio of the a�9justinent as condit:ioned
will. not crnlstitute =r inting of a speciEl] pri�il.ege i
i.ncon�;iatent w.ith tl�ie .1ti:iP,aCions on uther p�rop�rt,ies �
in th�� viui�uty c]ig.,i.{'�i.ed in the sa.me zone.
d. That the grf+nt:ing oP the adjustment wi.l.l not Le i
detrimental to the put��li.0 healtli, safety, or welfare, �
or materia.Ll,y .i.n,jurious to properties or i.wprovements
, in tihe � i.cir�i.ty�.
e. That. the grani;ing of the adjustment will not adverselv I
affect the urderlv deve�lopment of Y,he City. �
8. That a parcel. map be i':iled Lo combine al.l the lots within i
the site's boundaries.
!
9. T}iat the tr:�asl� enclosures cunPorm to the Cit�� of L�•n�:ood.
requirements, i
10. Demo.lition permi.t shall be obtaiiied from the Buil�`l.ing �
Di�ision prior tu removal uf the small. structure. �
F'S.re �Department Cond9 t� or�s �
11. Pro��i.de approved automaCi.c e:;tinguishi�ig s}ste.m (spr:inkler
spsteml throughout Luil�l:ing, suUmit p].ans tu Iiureau of Fire
Prevent�ion: �
12. Provide and submit pl�ns fw° automatic extingui.shii2g system �
in lci.tuhen. I
I
f
I
�
I
I
I
13. Pro��ide �p'pro��ed portuble fire e.�L'�i.n�ui.shers, (kitcl�en and
resCaurant area): �
14. Provi.de etiit signs over a]�l cti�i.i, rloors:
]�. Provide si.gns t:hat �1:ates (Doors to remain o�en duiing
F3usi.ness hhour�s:
Yublic I�'orlcs Depart;ment Condi.tio��s
16. Submi.ssi.on and recordation uC a I:>a�:•cel. mrap is requi.�ed.
17. Uedicai;e a( 10 ) i;en �.*ide strij� of propei�t�� alono I.,or�g F�e�ch
I�.1 vd .
18. Submit a grading plan �>rep�red and signed by a regist�.�red
Civil Engineer.
19. R�construct damaged side�allc a�.ong Lo�ig 13each Blvd.
20. Close esisting dri.ve approach .�nd construc�t proposed drive �
approach(es) Per Citp sT.andaras.
21. Construct tiao (2) wYieelcF�air cainps at southeast and northeast
corner of �1ichigan and Lnng Peach Blvd.
22. .Tnstall seven (i) 24" bc;� sCreet t;rees 7�er Cit,y of Lynwood
standards alorig Lon� Beach. Speci.es to be Grape `tyr.tle, A
permi t tu install the Lrees :is requircd b,v the };ngi.neeri��g
Di�-ision. Exact ].ocatioris of Ckie tree(s) cail]. be. determined
aC the time Che permit is issued. �
23. Construct tree we].1 covers per City of Lynwood standards for
e:tiisi.in� and prupused strr,eC Crees.
24. Undergrourid all uti.lit.i.es.
25. A pe�mit from the Engineering Dicision is requ.ired for all
off-site impr.ovements.
�
Sectiori 4. A certifi.ed copy of' this resoluti.un shall be �
delivered to the applicanL.
AYPROVED and ADOPTLD thi� 8 th da,y of Sepi;ernbe�:• 19F, i, by I
member of the Plannine Comiu:ission voting as folluws:
I
AYES: �
TOES: '
�
i
�1BSI:NT: �
ABSTAIN: I
�
�
i
I.,ucille Iianka, Chairpers.on !
�
i
I
i
I
i
�
�
�
I
f
�PNUOVr�v �s �ro cov���rx�r: �a��i�r�ovi.� .�s �ro ror�r�:
Vicentc L. Mas, liirector Hcnrp S. Flarbosa
Commun.i.ty De��el.oE�mrnt Dept. GeneraJ. Cour:sel
Disk 15: Peso2125
'
I
I
�
I
�
�
I
. ' i
L.00ATION IVIA�
:
n.r�-� � �.,i��' o 'o"'�'�-r�,a - "„ i � °'_
lU'i � �n, Q ?<� ,UJn,`n ..us 49`/4 C
�` '• y Vp � � :•� � I�
� u`Y LYt �' " A IS � .
�\' ,tt J p r ,� 14 1 I6 �Ilyy�� � � l8 19 ZO 21
. � y)v� m . i. 3� ya� g�3i e 945� .i
;� �� ��" M/NN£SOTA n �
� ���ts
_ . �tqiouo. �oo i�e ,w
:. ,� �it� 39 � eo � e w � s in . � � • . .
�pi�oo �oon i � � ' � W °WI � IObob
v v I �
q7ra., ao . o39 i 3lw ��— �? Ij5 9e
'��)Y?� looio i I �'" 1 -.L� r 10DOZ ,� � I jj .j1 ,
j � I =
IN s, jp dj ' �aoi �a I.o I.o
N � I �O II I di f 36 / p O
Y
I pVE• � �oo�i � �w w I � i [�as'o " \ �0
' t �� l `.hl da ��'� - I6 I 4a ,w, � D 49 �..�' S0 5/ 5
Yi: � '/�
'v 11(f' y C ,�
H Lf.
° /l0
p W y � s .- 0 3 .� W/SCON N � y�
� J _isn:�.'
� /�ic. r iornS o//,� � l 0 F/ZO i . .
j �.0 ��. �, � _,� /Oio) � �� � ; . .
Q ui ,.,,, iov� `� I � a: 67 �� —
. on. �.1 ions .. ioi �' � Y S _/.o�C6 '/6�G _` 65 64 6i 6i
'_d,e'a ° �z ` � o// \ ; �
� / p (5 � ' � Z i1.155
N
� a� �; a � ion� �oiay :
z .� 7S j � � 7� w �)0��7 „/oiaT7� 78 79 bp gi
� /a� ' oi3/ ���J� e �
)}t r
� M/CH/GAM � R �
i5J I
� � 3Sd �/6 � 0 d o D : . . , I
. `� � <N . 9,/0 � '6'O .
a ie *+ 95 94
W o �ss : u9 �� ua . j o� T o - 0 93 9�
� .. nOi OY� � ` ti � I
� .�3s, j .. :�68"' ro� � .. —, .—
� �a�� � ioa �
h !Y35C � 1�5 117/oaJ� IOi ` �04 / Ip5 �
106 107 IOb IOI
AS7 �o,v�
y p 1/6 d � /07a� loD3: �/od��/ v . I
/70 e
� 4 ^ ^ QUO/A y� o
�
� ' � � �i12�� a� oi
� �. n /e D b
� t o a o'u� � 2Z4 a� Zl� - 119 218 Z!7 116 215 I
5 a tZ5 � `
3 ao �M3J3 a iIb 1�. � �95
, // � /0 I 9 �66'��7 �ii7 � lO �
D . 1 • l96 !97 l98 I �99 200
8 . � a /�IJ3
i o � 80 ^ s
� CHfROKEE $ � � o � I
s�i � b ,
I i � ny�'yq rn$ � ly1 • . .
I �
11 l3 /4 I� l5 /7 � a I
I ' 171 IB9 I 188 !87 . Ifl6 l85
tl � o � I
i8 �
!.i 1 ' �� ' � .
" �Q /03
=� --- i9� R � o�bs �:., �. .:, i �, ,� , �„:, I
--,� zs ; za z3 ; zz � I i6� �i6a �1� � I I
�ba .���� �.I„ 5�i�ie� �o
w , r,� ��
.+v.s 21 OQ .�5f � � ` I�� � ��a �'^ I � lo
� 7ENAYA � � ' � � �
� '
� _ "� 3/�ovo 162 � ' I
DY(a ♦ � � c � c
I I6 y 27 ZN :� � I. �'� 32 16! �IA.7 �ll�" m � W �o L � t
� ' W W '•'-1Il.jj/?y�1 /avo '� m 15�7� �L15�5 • !Sl$��
���,, r.i�7: "e W j3au.,T .iev�Y �
• l o,r, N � � � nvii l60 , � � � ���
J "
'�7 eo �J -. :—lte�/oY5 /36 o e� �o eo" . .. �
, at a� I ao I � I
,�o .19, �`37_ �qiL1a��3 /35 g 137 1�C I3� ��I
� on f w�w �� w w
. � o � nen � '^lov �� b � m b. I w o Iw o
� SCM/NOLE +a g
.,..� j � s} � ^
I � I � I �.1 I I I � I� in _� S. � .:w. W, I
. � � � ' ♦• ... I
� I
- i
CASE NO. �j�p�(-f
��
C�Ii,iutfiT r1t ��i,=_; �itqrlr=_:
� �,... � , f P� �� "
�� � <i�ffu r iTt thr yhrriff ; n �•
�a � � '
� i�iail uf :�liu;tirr ��
��� 3�ns ��tgrles,(Lalifurniti �UUI^_
s�EAMnN g�ock, s-.E=�<< (213) 537-6111
May 15,1987 , I
CITY OF LYNWOOD
CONII�1UNITY DEVSLOYMENT DEPARTMENT
11330 BULI.IS ROAD
LYNh'OOD, CALIFORNIA 90262
RE: CASE NUMBER 87044
The site plans in the referenced case were reviewed by 5gt. Rod Penner.
COhbfENTS: The Sheriff's Department, Lynwood Station does not oppose the •
operation of the restaurant. We would, however oppose any additional liquor
----- -- -
establishments due to the high number__of_licensed �iremesis `in the area.
-�—---.. . ._. _ ..,.. ---- I
�
Sincerely, I
SAEFd�1AN BTACK, SHERIFF I
�%�� � ,.� �
i�f�t6k oP po / Captain
Commander, 7,ynwood Sheriff Station i
i
�
'
i
�
i
i
I
I
i
i
. i
ATTAC?T�DPI' T10. 1 I
.� _ �.
87053TPM
�� r� F n! DA ITEM NO. __:1.�.,,,,,,,.�
DATE: „ September 8, 1987 � :,,,;�
(.,��aSE ��1�. 9705 3
��
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 18893 CASE NO. 87053
Applicant: Donald R. Kittle
PROPOSAL:
The applicant is requesting Tentative Parcel Map approval to i
combine 2 lots (lots 15 and south 25 feet of lot 16) into one, in
order to construct fourteen (14) apartment units at 11339-41 �
Louise Avenue in the R-3 zone.
FACTS: ;
�
1. Source of Authoritv. �
Section 25-18, et seq., Subdivision Regulations of the '
Lynwood Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act, �
Government Code Section 66410, et seq.
�
2. Propertv Location. '
i
The subject properties are two rectangular-shaped lots located �
on the west side of Louise Ayenue between Sanborn Avenue and �
Century Blvd. �
3. Property Size. /
;
The site area is approximately 26,400 sq. ft.
i
i
4. Existing Land Use.
I
The site is presently develop with a single family unit and �
an detached double car garage. �
North - Single East - Single �
& Multi-Family & Multi-Family
South - Single West - Single ,
& Multi-Family & Multi-Family
i
5. Land Use Desicxnation. �
_
I
The General Plan designation for the property is Multi- �
Family; the zoning classification is R-3 (Multi-Family
Residential).
The surrounding land use designations are as follows: I
General Plan: Zoning:
North - Multi-Family R-3 I
South - Multi-Family R_3
East - Multi-Family R-3 '
West - Multi-Family R_3 �
�
D
�
I
�
6. Site Plan Review.
The map was reviewed by the Site Plan Review Committee at
its regular meeting on August 26, 1987, and the Committee
recommends Planning Commission approval, subject to
conditions.
7. Public Response.
Staff has received an expression of concern about the
proposed project from Mr. Harry Gibbens, 11327 Louise
Street, Lynwood, CA.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS
1. Environmental Assessment. I I
The Community Development Department has determined that the '
Tentative Parcel Map is exempt from the provisions of the �
State CEQA Guidelines, as amended, Section 15303, Class 3.
2. Staff analysis of this proposed lot consolidation includes �
the following findings: (a) Design of the proposed site; and �
(b) Consistency of the proposed site with the General Plan. j
Design of the proAOSed site consolidation �
a. The design of the proposed lot consolidation shows the I
consolidated lots to be in character with existing j
residential developments in the area. +
b. The proposed lot consolidation request consists of �
two (2) lots to be joined together for the purpose of
constructing multi-family residential units thereby I
allowing, for better utilization of residentially-zoned
lots.
j
Consistency of the site with the General Plan �
1
a. Staff's inspection shows the site to be compatible with j
the City of Lynwood's General Plan that limits land I
use activities to projects that enhance the function I
and quality of residential developments and that do not ,
significantly alter the character of the existing �
environment. i
b. The size and location of the proposed project does not I
significantly change the character of the existing
environment.
c. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan �
designation of Multi-family. I
�
RECOMMENDATION{S): !
i
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the I
Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2136: i
1. Finding that Tentative Parcel Map No. 18893, Case No. �
87053, is exempt from the provisions of the State �
CEQA Guidelines, as amended (Section 15303, Class 3) ;
i
2. Approving Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 87053, subject I
to the stated conditions and requirements. ,
D-9-1:87053tpm !
i
1
�
I
87053TPM
RESOLUTION NO. 2136
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 18893
TO COMBINE LOTS 15 AND SOUTH TWENTY-FIVE (25) FEET
OF LOT 16, IN BLOCK "B" OF TRACT N0. 9641, IN THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 189, PAGE 6
OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject �
application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered ;
all pertinent testimony offered in the case as presented at the :
public hearing; and '
i
WHEREAS, the preparation, filing and recordation of a �
Parcel Map is required for the proposed residential development; �
and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has determined �
that the proposed project is exempt from the provisions of the �
provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended, Section i
15061 (b) (3). �
5ection 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find and I
determine that said Tentative Parcel Map No. 18893 should be �
approved for the following reasons:
A. The combination of lots meets all the applicable
requirements and conditions imposed by the State '
Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations i
of the Lynwood Municipal Code.
f
B. , The proposed combination of lots is consistent with '
the applicable elements of the General Plan and the �
Official Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lynwood. f
I
C. Proper and reasonable provisions have been made for
adequate ingress and egress to the lots being I
combined.
D. Proper and adequate provisions have been made for all �
public utilities and public services, including �
sewers.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood �
hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 18893 in the R-3
(Multi-Family Residential) zone, subject to the following
conditions:
�
Resolutions: RES02136
f
;
1 �
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments.
2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement
of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and
agrees to the conditions of this resolution within fifteen
(15) days from the date of approval of said resolution by
the Planning Commission.
PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS
3. Within twenty-four (24) months after approval or conditional
approval of the Tentative Parcel Map, the subdivider shall
file with the City of Lynwood, a final parcel map in
substantial conformance with the Tentative Parcel Map as
approved or conditionally approved, and in conformance with
the Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of
the City of Lynwood. i
4. Prior to the expiration of the tentative parcel map, the I
subdivider may file an application with the Community '
Development Department for Planning Commission action on an �
extension of the expiration period. �
5. The final parcel map shall be filed with the City Engineer i
of the City of Lynwood. �
6. No grading permits or building permits shall be issued until �
the parcel map has been recorded in the Office of the Los �
Angeles County Recorder.
. i
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS i
�
7. Provide a ;
pproved (U.L. and State Fire Marshal) smoke I
detectors for each unit.
i
8. Provide one (1) 2A type fire extinguisher within 75 feet
travel distance on each floor. I
9. Provide 4" dry fire line to rear portion of property. �
(Obtain specific requirements from Lynwood Fire Department.)
I
10. Where securit �
y gates are installed on premises, the locking �
mechanism shall be of the type that does not require a key �
or any special knowledge to exit premises. Also, provide a ;
Knox Box at front of property. I
�
11. Where security bars are placed on bedroom windows, they i
shall meet requirements of U.B.C., Section 1204. i
�
i
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: �
12. Submit a grading plan signed by a registered Civil Engineer. !
Property is located within 100 year flood zone area. Pad
elevations shall be one (1) foot above flood level zone per �
flood boundary map. Also conform to all applicable codes i
per Section 12-1/2 of Lynwood Municipal Code. Building
above flood level will require substantial amount of fill, �
therefore, suggest alternative methods of design to minimize �
amount of livable space at ground level. �
I
�
i
2 ;
�
�
- I
_ �
13. Construct new monolithic 8" curb and 24" gutter new sidewalk
and required adjacent pavement along Louise Avenue.
14. Reconstruct two (2) damaged and substandard drive approaches
on Louise Avenue, per City of Lynwood standards.
15. Provide and install one (1) marbelite street pole with light
: fixture with underground services and conduits on Louise
Avenue.
16. Plant (1) parkway tree 20 feet North of South property line
per City standards. Type and size of species to be
determined by the Department of Public Works.
17. Regrade parkway and saw grass seeds.
18. Connect to public sewers. Each building shall be connected
separately. Since present site plan includes (6) buildings,
it may be advantageous to construct an eight (8") inch sewer
main line into the property. See Engineering Division for
details.
19. Underground all utilities.
�
�
Section 3. Sta,ff has determined that Tentative Parcel j
Map No. 18893, Case No. 87053, is exempt from the requirements of j
the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended, under Section 15303, Class �
3.
�
Section 4. A copy of this Resolution shall be delivered to �
the applicant. I
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 1987, !
by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: �
i
AYES: '
' I
I
NOES: j
I
ABSENT:
'
ABSTAIN: �
i
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: �
I
I
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa �
Community Development Dept. General Counsel ;
I
Resolution: RES02136 ,
;
;
i
i
I
I
�
3
I
�
87053
� ti ���IS'I NQ. �R ,:
. �. _
DATE: September 8, 1987 rl',�� i �o , �,�
..'..^����
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87053
Applicant: Donald R. Kittle
PROPOSAL:
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit i,
to develop fourteen (14) apartment units at 11339-41 Louise �
Avenue in the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone. ,
�
FACTS: �
1. Source of Authoritv. �
Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that I
a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to build or !
relocate dwelling units in the R-3 zone. Section 25-4.Sb8 i
regulates density bonuses.
2. Property Location. ;
The subject property is known as 11339-41 Louise Ave. and I
consists of two (2) rectangular lots between Sanborn Avenue
and Century Boulevard. (Refer to attached Location Map.) I
3. Property Size. �
i
The site is approximately one hundred (100') wide and two i
hundred and sixty-four feet (264') deep; the total area is �
approximately 26,400 square feet.
4. Existinq Land Use. �
The property is presently developed with a single dwelling +
unit and detached double car garage. The surrounding land �
uses are as follows:
I
I
North - Single & East - Single & i
Multi-Family Multi-Family ,
South - Single & West - Single & !
Multiple-family Multiple-Family �
i
5. Land Use DescriAtion, j
I
The General Plan designation for the subject property is �
Multiple-Family Residential, and the zoning classification ;
is R-3 The surrounding land use designations are as
follows: ,
�
i
i
Ordstudy3:87053cup ;
�
i
I
�
Case #87053
' General Plan Zoning
North - Multi-Family North - R-3
South - Multi-Family South - R-3
East - Multi-Family East - R-3
West - Multi-Family West - R-3
6. Project Characteristics:
The applicant proposes to develop fourteen (14) apartment.
, The design consists of: (a) 6 two-bedroom units, (b) 4,
three-bedroom units, (c) 4 two (2) units with private patio and
a common B-B-p pit. (Refer to attached plans.) The proposed I
development is also offering a shared playground, laundry I
facility, stamped concrete driveway, and security gates.
�
A total of thirty (30) parking spaces (10 enclosed, 16 �
I
carports, and 4 open parking spaces for guest parking and �
the handicapped ).
i
A six-foot (6') high block wall will be constructed along I
the perimeter of the lot, except in the twenty (20') foot i
setback in which the wall will not exceed four (4') feet in
height.
A minimum of twenty-five (25�) percent of the site area �
will be compromised of landscaped open space with an (
automatic irrigation system. i
�
The total height of the principal buildinq does not exceed I
thirty-five (35')ft. The height of the accessory structures
does not exceed fifteen (15') feet.
�
i
7. Site Plan Review �
On August 27, 1987, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated �
the proposed development and recommended approval by the �
Planning Commission, subject to specific conditions. '
8. Zoninq Enforcement Historv I
The Community Development Department files do not show any �
zoning enforcement history.
�
i
9. Public Response. !
Staff has received an expression of concern about the '
proposed project from Mr. Harry Gibbens, 11327 Louise Street, �
Lynwood, CA. ;
I
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: i
1. Consistencv with General Plan �
The property is consistent with the existing zoning ,
classification (R-3) and the General Plan designation �
(Multi-Family Residential). Therefore, granting Conditional. ,
Use Permit No. 87053 will not adversely affect the Lynwood i
General Plan. �
Ordstudy3:87053cup I
�
. j
�
� i
i
�
�
2. Site Suitability
The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the proposed development.relative to density, bulk of the
structures, parking, walls, fences, landscaping, driveways
and other development features required by the Zoning
Ordinance. �
The property is adequately served with the required public
utilities and offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian
accessibility.
3. Compatibility
. The proposed development is surrounded by high density
residential developments; therefore, the project will be
compatible with the development in the area. �
4. Compliance with Development Standards �
The proposal meets all of the development standards required I
by the Zoning Ordinance with respect to parking; front, I
side, and rear-yard setbacks; distance between structures; �
lot coverage; open space and landscaping; building height; �
unit size and density. �
i
The base density within the R-3 2one (18 unit/acre) allows �
the development of eleven (11) units. The applicant has �
requested the maximum density bonus allowed by the Zoning �
Ordinance. Therefore, three (3) additional units may be
granted as follows: ;
i
o Section 25-4.5b8 (bonus clause for the provisions ,
of low and moderate income housing) permits i
granting up to 30$ of the base density, provided
all development standards are met and the �
applicant agrees to enter into a ten (10) year ;
covenant with the City to ensure that the rent
for the bonus units will remain at affordable �
or fair market rent levels. �
5. Conditions of Ap roval
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions I
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have '
a negative effect on the values of the surrounding �
properties or interfere on the values of the surrounding �
properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, I
safety or welfare. '
6. Benefits to Communitv I
The proposed development will aid in aesthetically upgrading ,
the neighborhood and will act as a catalyst in fostering
other quality developments. Furthermore, the development �
will add favorably to the City's housingg stock and will
provide additional affordably-priced housing in furtherance '
of the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. !
7. Environmental Assessment �
Staff has found that no substanial environmental impact will �
result from the proposed development; therefore, a Negative ;
Declaration has been prepared and is on file in the '
Community Development Department. '
Ordstudy3:87053cup
�
�
'
�
RECOMMENDATZON
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration The Planning
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2132:
1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 87053,
will not have a significant effect on the environment and
certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate.
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 87053, subject to the
stated conditions and requirements.
i
�
I
Attachments �
I
1. Location Map.
2. Plans.
3. Resolution No. 2132. �
�
I I
I
I
�
i
�
�
I
�
I
I
l i
f
f
�
�
f,
ORDSTUDY3: 87053CUP
1
'�
i
i
+ I
I
i
- �
87053
RESOLUTION NO. 2132
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 87053 TO CONSTRUCT FOURTEEN
(14) UNITS IN THE R-3 (MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL ZONE, 11339-41 LOUISE AVENUE,
LYNWOOD, CA.
WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to
law, conducted a public hearing on subject application for a I
Conditional Use Permit; and i
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission carefully considered I
all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and I
I
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for �
development in the R-3 (MUlti-Family Residential) zone. I
section 1
i
The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as
follows=
A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size
and shape to accommodate the structures, parking,
walls, landscaping, driveways and other I
development features required by the Zoning
Ordinance. I
B. The granting of the proposed Conditional Use �
Permit will not adversely affect the Lynwood ,
General Plan. �
i
C. The structures as proposed, or modified, subject �
to conditions, will not have a negative effect on I
the values of surrounding properties or interfere
with or endanger the public health, safety or �
welfare. �
I
D. The site will be developed pursuant to the current i
zoning regulations and site plan submitted,
reviewed and approved by the Site Plan Review i
Committee. I
E. The proposed development will add favorably to the I
housing stock and will provide additional I
affordably priced housing in concert with the �
policies of the Housing Element to the General j
Plan. �
� �
i
F. The proposed development will aid in aesthetically '
upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in
fostering other quality developments.
I
Section 2 i
The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based (
' upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby I
approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 87053, provided the �
following conditions are observed and complied with at all times. �
I
i
i
i
�
�
Case #87053
Communitv Development Department
1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments.
2. The applicant or his representative, sfiall sign a Statement
of Acceptance within fifteen (15) days from the date of
approval of this Resolution by the Planning Commission.
Signing this statement implies that applicant or his
representative has read, understands and agrees to the
conditions of this Resolution.
3. The applicant or his representative, shall sign a Statement
of Acceptance within fifteen (15) days from the date of
approval of this Resolution by the Planning Commission.
Signing this statement implies that applicant or his
representative has read, understands and agrees to the
conditions of this Resolution. j
PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS: (
I
4. A parcel map shall be required to merge the 2 lots into one I
parcel. I
5. All City of Lynwood Municipal Code and Zoning Ordinance
requirements shall be met. j
6. The total development will consist of fourteen (14) I
apartment units, along with parking and other amenities.
i
7. A minimum of thirty (30) parking spaces shall be provided. �
At least fourteen (14) of the total parking spaces shall be
uncovered with two (2) parking space for guest/handicapped. �
8. A minimum if twenty-five percent (25�) of the lot shall be
landscaped and provided with an automatic irrigation system. I
9. Apartment building and unit numbers shall be plainly visible �
and shall be a minimum of four inches (4") in height and
shall be contrasting in color to the background. �
10. The Community Development Department shall have the right of I
reasonable inspection, as with any other business within the �
City, for the purpose of protecting the general health, �
safety and welfare. !
11. A trash enclosure shall be provided per Building Division �
standards. i
12. All construction shall be performed by a licensed contractor. '
13. A landscape plan shall be submitted and approved prior to �
the issuance of building permits. �
i
14. No principal building on the site shall exceed a height of
thirty-five (35') feet.
15. All drivewa and �
y parkinq areas shall be paved, and shall have
i
sufficient illumination for security. ,
16. Construction shall be completed within six (6) months from �
date of issuance of building permits.
�
i
f
;
i
!
' i
17. The Conditional Use Permit shall become null and void if
compliance under the foregoing conditions does not commence
within ninety (90) days from the date on which the
Conditional Use Permit was granted.
18. A masonry wall six feet (6') in height shall be constructed
along the perimeter of the property, except within the twenty
foot (20') front yard setback, which shall not exceed four
feet (4') in height.
19. The applicant shall aqree to execute a covenant to be drafted
by the City Attorney restricting rent levels to fair market
rent levels for the bonus unit for ten (10) years from date
of issuance of certificate of occupancy.
20. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved.
21. Final buildinq elevations, including materials of
construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the
Building Official prior to issuance of any building permits.
22. Before any building permits may be issued, the i
applicant/developer shall pay $1.50 per square foot for
residential buildings to the Lynwood Unified School District, �
pursuant to Government Code Section 53080. �
I
I
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS !
23. Provide approved (U.L. and State Fire Marshal) smoke detectors I
for each unit. (U.B.C.)
24. Provide one (1) 2A type fire extinguisher within 75 feet I
travel distance on each floor.
25. Provide 4" dry fire line to rear portion of property. (Obtain �
specific requirements from Lynwood Fire Department.)
26. Where a security gates are installed on premises, the locking
mechanism shall be of the type that does not require a key or
any special knowledge to exit premises. Also, provide a Knox
Box at front of property.
27. Where security bars are placed on bedroom windows, they shall
meet requirements of U.B.C., Section 1204.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS I
28. The property is composed of two separate lots; tie in the two
lots by filing a parcel map.
29. Submit a grading plan signed by a•reqistered Civil Enqineer.
Property is located within l00 year flood zone area. Pad
elevations shall be one (1) foot above flood level zone per
flood boundary map. Also conform to all applicable codes per �
Section 12-1/2 of Lynwood Municipal Code. Building above
flood level will require substantial amount of fill, �
therefore, suggest alternative methods of design to minimize �
amount of livable space at ground level. ?
30. No grading and/or building permits shall be issued until the I
parcel map has been recorded in the Office of the Los I
Angeles County Recorder.
(
�
I
�
+
,
31. Construct new monolithic 8" curb and 24" gutter new sidewalk
and required adjacent pavement along Louise Avenue.
32. Reconstruct (2) damaged and substandard drive approaches on
Louise Avenue, per City of Lynwood standards.
33. Provide and install (1) marbelite street pole with light
fixture with underground services and conduits on Louise
Avenue.
34. Plant (1) parkway tree 20 feet North of South property line
per City standards. Type and size of species to be determined
by the Department of Public Works.
35. Regrade parkway and saw grass seeds.
36. Connect to public sewers. Each building shall be connected
separately. Since present site plan includes (6) buildings,
it may be advantageous to construct an eight (8) inch sewer
main line into the property. See Engineering Division for
details.
37. Underground all utilities.
Section 3 . Staff has found that no substantial
environmental impact will result from the proposed development;
therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared and is on
file in the Community Development Department and the Office of
the City Clerk.
Section 4 . A copy of this Resolution shall be delivered
to the applicant.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 1987,
by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES: i
NOES: I I
ABSENT: I
ABSTAIN: '
�
I
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson �
i
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
f
Vicente'L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
I
Community Development Dept. General Counsel �
�
Resolutions: RES02132 I
�
,
.�.ocA n���
:
- 1 .. � II�.: •� ' �. �. � o� �' � � � 0 O
�.1 o o Su q+.. p /IO � 6/.0! ZO/Ol p '�µ�i
� ' j74 V O � � � b /1 � O . e $ .
� u}� V z♦ ��b. ;�.i � f��
YJ In 777 ��a• j " r ' \ u /A � b i�li0 ��.___ ^ `O � .
-f I i. � '� + ,:. " .•o�e.r JO.dSJ`4 il... � �� :� 7 ya� . /
�� ntm .� �.:u L
-� �~ ,.daS O 1��.n I : O � /7 �i�.. e �'ii. I /Y -o S �
� r ,�. � Z V ���. o � isa��:
I� !7S r ��, y ' \ ,. za�.�J - �� _L onc> .$
, S ,< ,a s ,: r o
�� ,,,,. s . ,. � ,.. ,,o ,o,,�r � � c
� . 1=— — V „ — -- -- —,-
I�:I'::�7{ p' qn. 6 5 l �.i;i o i C
b , � n^ /S I,i.. - b 0 lo `67 �� IJ0G1 0 ♦
� ` , � Q � �v
zoo.si
� ,,. ,
�I � 17! O i,� ir.o O -- _L-_-_�
7r b /J e �e ;,. Qoo.fe �
e d�.� � __-__-L .
-�� i : . 8 � _ � $
� i71 � ` e �" . . _ isa � 6a zsa �z _ ,,., a � i : +', /
o iio-.. ` �' w /! E `�w - F - /
_I ii:.: ~ . ____ �,i�e , . �
Y 9�.'i77/ O n�., 'b ° /I ...i r is0..: x ooa.s/ ,� e_� /
•� iN �� o_ _.�i-- ZSO.�/ '-._� � ��
�I R � , ��ij 70 � y ��,.. '; ° --- - y' �_ �so _L 6j T 9J0 °� 8 o Saa'��r'
a n �
�� /01 �� i�.� � .
' :l n..� : �" -' '-_"'_ �i.'°e- D99.6J ,4 �lTl�_E
u C T Ih.r U �� o�
�_-�
�� �ss � ,� :� �, „ o �. ez �a .
-- I o �..� � r ,, A nTiu � T _ll_1SO -
,. 36d o �'�n:.: "0� � I n � .fezss � ��(J
.��p.. ;! �.n 6 / Q
__I . �. � I � L I L - � - ,:�n - T - zA2oi=.._n ' � �
'� � .°, '��n ,+�� D . � ! �p/ � � � � � C ~ ,..m � - �� �9 E �p ,
_.. y � t
� - AVE. �SArJ;�C��1v $ r--- �4sa ,,,-_�
�. S 6 i�]oa � , � `� t � �i
e
� ,roa V � ! S - 73o a� Q� �noe .°, p \ .
: 3.:, �f1 a s0 <. � ., °° o t° I �° : �° L w _ . �. v ro is�o> N .
=_ �... ♦ a / c I� o. �. ��10 I o .... w �., ee3.ea ���„ "' I
o �� - �� .� �� _ , o 0
C �dS : zs1 " " _ _ _ _��_� _� i
� �� �
i . ° - �� ���� o ��Q ..e,• S9 ,nn ° Ld
� o i..i Z � 1 . r � t L Q� I
1 !6I NI � " �.n�c V' /L
!f lia w I
i,.. . . oi;,.• ! ' R -�-_� ` ' o $ ��e�e =L /9511
� r g J6i y '° ,.,,. �� ... R isr.rt - iTSf� . �
p �.,no i
li.�� V /!l7! $ /1l.7 �.�n JO , %
R n::, ��.�. � N - n - u$ e se _ r I
�. P Q --0f2- u��� i �,., N �" v�.su � Ti.f�s� ~ ��� i
� . �n�i � ,•vs $ � -d.5
_ ,.,�. R f �� M ,v �$ ins� _� i�i�v _� �,) I
f = 2 �,,,. � -,—� — ,.,,4 � S"
• ��„� � ,,,,. , �, � 3 I
a C. �.,.. e j, B c s_ ` �_ ' zus _ 1� !�i�J _ to r°, l
/ y 2.. �.... � i I� .us �
J ` 3 i �o, .�s� z �
' � �,,.. � �� ��.., o
,.,
e : iss ° 0 7, j� � . _
^u ... : v _..� �! .OJ _ If.f
� - I�„� � t �o.. %��� I zes.av> o I
1 !SS lu,. �� � �ns� e � ° �K �o.. � ss ,,,+,
n..� .Q y � � Q �n `' /n lRi! . I
rl��u
y �d.i \te•� l
�7 .�. �� � �. � � � � � �� ` /y ' V ♦
i.... Y `_! y_ � _ ; _ _� _ i�.iL � ` '�- - 1 . i
� �
�" s .s�:. .n�i V ..: e
, 3 es1 . .:: 3 • .., � � ` � 1 ,
' �u.. N "�=c"�:-,.a+:'_=:,_: •nu tt!✓
< <l Fcs""':' ' 'i
- Y e••• UI 1� SO f0 �h•� O., f0 , f0 ID SG �.H . I
t�� .. �SS' a ir•. �� I I i i// � v.. o I.fe f0 S/ f j� .°,
1.`• A � ' . Y✓ Io � �
!: . ifd: f0 �'b=i $ t cl � : � : t ": ��n � a�� "v se ro so .)u j, 170? 1 � � =
__� �:� lfei L . � } ' y � Q�VD• I
f._ � um i �+
BLVD 7 � � �
� �a . • 2 �� . :� I
� Y.+ .. n � . : i \ � : : i ^ `�
•�I ;i��, � i! . � � 3 : � - 3 g : I' . " I ^
:. i 9i :r .{L. ^ '_. +' � io-n-- �R
!^�� 2Ci 21� 22 23 ' 24 1 25� 26 2T y 28 29 , 30 31'
I b � i
� . .o
� �
.-q I ap 41 42� � 43 44 43 46 47 48 49 SO 31 L UGO � PARK �� -----_
� ' 0 � �9� � '` _MIIf__ � I
_ ~ �_.. � � Y�i1
�S ` , n, �' !O• \ �
— ° �v£ Y �C�rr of tnvwocnl a � � y �� , . _ - - �
o ' ... ��r E - iZ9 - q - . . '
� �' '• � t`' . • ' .,s� . .,,, oo ,...., _"__{.aF�
a . n � sf. rit N •e� /O q ^ __-____ -
•el F � m ; `p,,. m: C� �::o } .<-� ' s9 J F
, i'�. ! ' �' N -e Z
I .', r , I S .. - ;d m° o ��,,, y � �,..� = PORTION ' ..,.,. �,
� r � OF LOr / '
„
�, .
„ ,.,..
; „ , �-----
- -- tt ,., r rn �n; N -------'-`.o__ �
P� m n. T O �v - YR.J.NS I
I r � . .' _""
I
�
� _ l �
� CASE NO. ��� ?
�
♦ ' 1 •
01�6�
:_.�........_. ...._� �- :� .. ..... .........
L . , n ___"' '
. t_.
:.�. - { �Q. 8 _ _ .. ..........:�
� � . �
i i ,
� , �, `, t. ' � , � .
, ;,, v ���1 �. �S'] 0 �`f �� �
n.a�rL: sE s, r�s� '°°""��a
TO: PLANtiI��G C'OMM�ISS7:O:V.
FRO"9: Vicente L. Mas, Directue
Commun.itc llevelopmrnt Departm�nt
SUFSJECT: Condition Use Permit N S� Ofi4
Applioant Rafael Zapien
PROPOSAL:
Thc ariplicanC is request.ing a Condi.ti.onal Use Permit to build a
duE�lex at 12�02 I',arc•is Avenue, in the R-2 (Two-Familp
Resid.ential) zone,
I
I
FACTS: I
�
1. Source of Au�thoritv. �
I
Sect,ion 2�-}.2 of the l.,�nwood Zoning Ordinance req�.�i.res tliat �
a Conditional Use Perm:it L ubCained i.n urder to Luild or
retocaCe dwelli.ng uni.ts in t.he R-2 zone.
i
2. Property Locatiun. �
i
The si.ib,ject property uonsi.s'ts of a si.ngle lvt h-r_tween �
Carlin Avenue and Olanda Str�rt. (See att.ache.d Locat:i.on �
Map.l ,
j
3. Prop�rtti Size. i
The sub,ject is rectangular in shape and is �ppro��i�natc;l��
si�t,y three £eer (63' j wide a��d unu hwidced ar,d seve�ity
seven feet (l�i�i') cteep; the total aiea is approaimate].�� 9600 �
squ�re feei;. I
I
4. E�i.stin,� Land lisr. �
The prope�•ty is preseiitly� devel.opr-_�d iaitli single famil5• �
resi.dential. The surrounding lai�d u'ses are as t'ollows: �
�
North - Single-L'ami7.y� EasC - Singlc-Pamily � �
& Multiple-Pamil�• & Multiple-Famil,y �
South - Si.nglr-I?ami1-; West - Single-Pami].y i
& yultiple-Fami:L,y I
5. Land. C�se Descri.utiun. � I
The General Plan desi�nation f.'or the si.ibject I�ropert:y is
Towtiliouse S Cluster Housing, an�l the zoning designai;ion is �
R-2 ('['wo-Famil,v ResidenCia7.). The surrounding ].aiid use �
desi�nations are as fol:Lows:
i
r
1
I
'
�
�
;
i
I �
-- -- -- -- --_ I
G eriera l P].an Zonin�
NorCh - 'I'�i�:nl�ouse & NorCh - R-2
Cl.ustei� l�Cousing
SouCh - 9i.ngle-Family South - R-2
P:,as�t - 'Pownhouse & Eas� - R-2
Cl.uster HoLisino
le'est - Townhous� b �Cest - R-2
C].uster Housino'
6. Pro.iect Characteristics:
The applicant pro�oses to rcmove the esisting accessury
structure at the rear uf the single-family dwelling and
build a two-stocv duple� for a total of three (3) dwe].l.ing
unit:s. The devel.opmFnt; will consisf; of tc;o, (2) two-bedroom
, units and fi.ve (5) enclosea gara�es Leneatli the units, wi.i:h
].aundry and storagE facilil:i.es :I.ucated a�t the �•ear� of the
property. A s�x-foot (Ei') L wa11 fence will be built. un
t_he pei�imeter of the lot, r�ce.pt in the front yard set back,
i.r� whicl� the m�xi.iritun he:lghl', i.s four (�4' ) ft.
7. Si.te Plan Revie:w
At its i°egulmr meetirig on August 26, 193i, the Site P1an
Review Commit.tee approved the, proposed project, subject to
t}'�e conditions and rec�uirements stated in the attact':ed
Resol.utiun.
8. 7onin� Enforcemerit Historv
None of record.
9. PuUlic Resnonse
�
None received at time of agenda posl.ing. i
�
AN.ILYSIS .4�D CO\'CLUSICN: j
1. Consistency with General Plan �
I
The proposed land use i consisCent with the ewisti.ng Zon:ing �
classification (R-2) and the General Ptan designation �
(Townhouse & Cluster Housing), Therefor.e, the greinting of 1
the Condi.tional Use PermiC \o. 870fi4 will nut adversely (
affect the General Plan. I
i
2. Site Suitabi].it�- �
I
The pcoperty is adequate i.n size and shape to accommodate �
the proposed development r�lia�tive to structures, parlcing, �
walls, i'ences, landscaping, ilriveways and other deve].opment
feat�res required by the Zo�iir��g Ordinarice.
3. Comnati_bil.itv �
The proposed dcvelopmer�t is surrounded by a mi.xture of �
mulCiple an�l single fami7.�� re5ideni:ia.L deeelopments; i
therefore, the project will _be compatible with the
development in t;he �xrea. �
4. Oumpl.i.ance witli De.veloj�ment S�andards �
The proposed subject meet=: al]. of the devel.opmerit s�tai�dards �
required Uy the 2oning Ordinance �aith x•espect to parki.ng; r
front, sicle, and rea'r-,vard setLaolc�; distanee betraeen� �
I
�
I
i
I
— (
structures; 1oC coverrxge; opru spiioe und ].andsoap�ing;
building heighC; uni.t si.ze an<1 derrsi.t:y.
The base �lensity iaithin the R-`L 7_une (1�1 un.i.t/acre) al.lows
the development of thrre (3) uni.Y,s.
5. Condit:i.oiis of Anproval.
The impr.ovemenr,s as pi�opose<l, subject to Cl�e uondit�ions
recommended t}� the Site Plan Re� ic�.� Comm.ittee, iail:L iiot have
a negative ePfect un tl�e v�ilues oF the su�•rounding
properties or interfere c:ith cr er�aanger the pub:Lio heal.th,
safet,y or welfare.
6. Benefits to Communi.tr
The proposed de�elopme��t will aid in aestheticall�� uperad:ing
the neighborhood and will aut as a catal5st in f'oster:ing
other quali.ty- development;s. Furthermore, the develo�>ment
caill add favoraU7.}� to the CiCy°'s housing stoc}c and will
pt:•ovide additional affoi-dably-pricecl housing in furtherance
of the polici.es o�f Y.he Housi.n� 'Element of the General Plan.
i. F.nv.irorimental assessment
This development is categorice�lly esempt from the CI:(�A
requirements as amended Section 17303, Class 3.
RECqht•."tENDATIOA' : �
Staff' respectfully° requests that after consideration Tlie Planning I
Commission adopt the attached Resolirtion No. 2193: I
l. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No. I
8i064, us categoi•ically exempt from the provisions of
the State C'EQA Gni.drl.ines, as amended (Sect.ion 15303 '
Class 3). �
2. Approv�ing Conditional Use Fermit No. 87064, subject, to �
t}�e stated cotiditions �na requirements. �
• I
9TTACHMENTS �
] . Locat:i.on A1ap. �
2. Plans.
3. Resolution No. 2143. !
1
I
' Disli 12: 870Fi4CUP �
�
�
f
I
i
!
�
�
�
r
i
i
87064
RESOLUTION NO. 2143
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 87039 TO CONSTRUCT TWO (2) UNITS IN
THE R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, 12502
HARRIS AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CA.
WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to
law, conducted a public hearing on subject application for a
Conditional Use Permit; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission carefully considered
all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for
development in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone.
section 1
The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as
follows:
A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size
and shape to accommadate the structures, parking, I
walls, landscaping, driveways and other
development features required by the Zoning '
Ordinance.
B. The granting of the proposed Conditional Use I
Permit will not adversely affect the Lynwood
General Plan.
C. The structures as proposed, or modified, subject
to conditions, will not have a negative effect on
the values of surrounding properties or interfere I
with or endanger the public health, safety or
welfare.
i
D. The site will be developed pursuant to the current �
zoning regulations and site plan submitted, '
reviewed and approved by the Site Plan Review �
Committee. �
E. The proposed development will add favorably to the !
� housing stock and will provide additional I
affordably priced housing in concert with the i
policies of the Housing Element to the General �
Plan. I
F. The proposed development will aid in aesthetically ,
upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in �
fostering other quality developments. i
Section 2. +
The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based �
upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby '
approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 87064, provided the (
following conditions are observed and complied with at all times. �
i
I
�
I
1
i
1
.
�
�
_ �
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments.
2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement
of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and
agrees to the conditions of this resolution within fifteen
(15) days from the date of approval of said resolution by the
Planning Commission.
3. All requirements of all City departments shall be met.
4. All City of Lynwood Municipal Code requirements shall be
met.
PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS
5. The total development will consist of two (2) residential
apartment units along with parking and other amenities.
6. A minimum of six (6) parking spaces shall be provided. At
least three (3) of the total parking spaces shall be covered.
7. A minimum if twenty-five percent (25�) of the lot shall be
landscaped and provided with an automatic irrigation system.
8. Apartment building and unit numbers shall be plainly visible
and shall be a minimum of four inches (4") in height and
shall be contrasting in color to the background.
9. The Community Development Department shall have the right of
reasonable inspection, as with any other business within the
City, for the purpose of protecting the general health,
� safety and welfare. �
I
10. A trash enclosure shall be provided per Building Division �
standards.
i
11. All electrical and plumbing installation shall be performed !
by a licensed contractor. (
12. A landscape plan shall be submitted and approved prior to �
,receiving building permits. �
i
13. No principal building on the site shall exceed a height of ;
thirty-five (35') feet.
14. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved, and shall have �
sufficient illumination for security. �
15. Construction shall be completed within six (6) months from �
date of issuance of building permits. '
16. All driveway and parkinq areas shall be paved.
i
17. Final building elevations, including materials of �
i
construction, shall be submitteeed to and approved by the
Building Official prior to issuance of any building permits.
I
18. Before any building permits may be issued, the
applicant/developer shall pay $1.50 per square foot for '
residential buildings to the Lynwood Unified School District, I
pursuant to Government Code Section 53080.
i
!
19. Demolition permit shall be obtained prior to removing the
structure at the rear of the property.
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
20. Provide approved (U.L. and State Fire Marshal) smoke
detectors for each unit. (U.B.C.)
21. Provide one (1) 2A type fire extinguisher within 75 ft.
travel distance.
22. Provide 4" dry fire line to rear portion of property. (Obtain
specific requirements from Lynwood Fire Department.)
23. Where security gates are installed on premises, the locking
mechanism shall be of the type that does not require a key or
any special knowledge to exit premises. Also, provide a Knox
Box at front of property.
24. Where security bars are placed on bedroom windows, they shall
meet rrequirements of U.B.C., Section 1204.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS: I
25. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered
Civil Engineer.
26. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected
separately. Construct laterals as necessary.
I
27. Provide and install one (1) marbelite street pole with light I
fixture, underground services and conduits north of northerly j
drive approach.
(
28. Underground all utilities. �
29. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all �
off-site improvements. i
30. Existing structure to be underground utilities. �
�
31. Align existing drive approaches with driveways. j
�
Section 3. The proposed project is categorically I
exempt from the CEQA requirements as amended Section 15061 Class i
3(6). �
I
Section 4. A copy of this Resolution stiall be delivered I
to the applicant. i
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 1987, '
by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: i
i
AYES:
i
NOES:
ABSENT: I
ABSTAIN: !
i
�
�
j
�
�
I
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
Community Development Dept. General Counsel
I
I
�
i
�
I
i
;
',
I
I
i
I
i
i
i
i
i
i
Resolution: RES02143 �
I
�
�
(
�
� L.�CATIO� �IA�
:
¢ ..� ... ^ �, -
l0�_-____ --AS--� V Q%�� - -�IN� __�j"/,S
� IDe ii7 �ie.� ` '� .. i,r � ' �o,.
" 111 - �uz -- t —, +:« _' noie �oup r �... , m�
� r 1 ___qf___ __� ___ '_
Z __ �_�___ .a�� � " .. x = - _
,.� . F- � �' ^
W u 4d 99 si� �� �" 91 � CIlS�qS'' j`.,.I6 � c/ �.�
Q ` v � : �°�� _ _'_J_+1 � __ __
a 9R --vc` i -- ` � � °- -�r - � -zo
n ' •f `'� iY: 74`'.e c ..,
1
LAVINIA
' � j1( �/ ]/I � J/.7 � ]/.l !//� � /� /Il I] IO SI
.a ,��•i��� � 1 �o � �« le � �
-.ii--�,7^ `j: ^I' 1 ` I: I> I• � !I��.��
.., y : I, 'i I ''I I
I 1� vl JI `�I I I I � N
_in_ 4 � r. y . I: �j �I ` I � � � »I
IJ,1 `_ -,-- j 7 I . I t I �wl ��• ��`
^i I n��• �:I \
Q N 4 ___ , __Ill ___ , )�.l f/} � l/l � lll�l \I I � h Sd
Q �..,'ii7• F e P ! � � � � �n+`�'I ea
a 5 .�„ �.e` � 1 „
W � 6 tia. I i � o�Jq
_ �.�,. `a ! �n > , , o. i �,i � ,
N J ' �' a l 7 h ea ' .,.f ' �I ,o � .
Z W cU � r.T i fo� b.a . sa.z ii :��i� .e �"P
� �� ` � � 3 .... , r� ��a� � � � I X
7 0� �
Q � • --- � Z ,.•„ .. N .z� �io ii. j�7: r �� ^n: r
eo e„ � i i'' a �'vu 5 K:� �u, � / .. °'
Q in• �/6 ° I
iu,v F / . . So� Sc �Y
o _ne�_ ° ` 2 . ,
AVENUE � �eo =_ns�_� "e� r s�
3,f a ,,. , ALVADA a ST. �
�ie so �^ I
I � �: . a� rl r�rs .�n11 n
i ;� T R A� T ^— ieo --i�c i " Z e •, ° f
o � „ � �a n zz ti. :_+^
o`
lULr� 1�� S !a� �1« � l u � n � �' �
gG - �.o T es l .e�e n. ,.a. W .,. e�l
ti ..w w"� � 1 0� u
LOT 6 - � I o Zo � � l6 i
° � y^ h ° � , I � � ,�.., �_ ,:,. o :
\ \� r O i\ ♦ iU ^I �b ^ ' il\ O ,O 4
Q
�p ��„s _ �._,: -�� �� �: 4 . ��,,.� �
` �I 7 " 0 2
� � . "�� wo i � I � PpR710N LOtf 2 � h�8 ^
� b
�na � $ � i � � i ' ..� ` 361 l!l `�� •
�n�r �r s� ; °' I o°1 � : I '�.ero ° n� o., � �� `
I �6 I6 BS 7T � 9a ' ��
1
$ � � � � �
� � � �
�
rfb S/ -� 5/ 6@I ��" ]]n3 IZag � So p��. � ���q e ♦ 3l 33 cs3s [S)f aX s�ea
. .^ ; 4 . � i r� d0 „�a�3o.�� I SS I-TS �>Sf _ _ ♦- � � _ p� ^ ^ �
z ^ ,. �y �oz " J,Y BLuLI� :<o, � S,«o, � : „ � > �
6 ^ 9 ^ /D ^ // 6�� q ^ / � � � 0 F�OR'T ON �Q � � , ° 2 , ° 3 eo � / 2 � 3 v / � ' 1 � � 3 . e: 6B i I
u n \ v .e i i t � 11 �LOT� 7� o � r .:.., ,�<,s i
� � � eo au „ �: ttu � r ro.eo
s� Y f� ft�t md Y rzn' V "� � � TRkCT� ^• e E^° ,� 'a� I
. . � � ncvs in n�er ;:<
`e J ior rs rs sr ss Y+�• �
r � F W n° 'Q ,,� ItJ `,�.. , � : � .�<..� .ro 67 >
'� �/6 /7 /6 l5 /l� 6s S� /` j K J C A.q� � 7o Q 98.E9 ., � � aau $� ,t 66 ��
( C ]at3 O �
� �- v' z/t��a. O ^ �9 ��e '1.� ry J �425 + � l � ll �^I
ia si N v ri •' I > S �'" �. � � Q + . o ,iavi � ..r�6S I
4. �e lSD � 4 S/ S.'70 'M � �/7 N, 6 t.�. ` q 6 ,� � x
AVENUE ° g"m o o ,.,,' � 6 �.�e;, �e., � 66 I
3fe si ., y . .3i ��iai a a. � t . d = e
3 - ; a i M S 4 �� not. � sp fo ,+n ��`° e e � L ti~ ',o � 7 8 >a 9� . 63 I
� a � 3 a . I
t1 33 J6 3] 36 J9� 7� 6. 9o %Ob�//' , .�/1^ %J.°, /l F /S 9 nso, .vs c 6Z I
"' � F� V„ B . .
� R
rtu v . . n so � ` so . isr� �`. I s A m�� 95. �°� /O �• � 6� �
ir ...ru..� 'Q 9 �..a_ .m 9 :so, . .
—l�nw.�ed Cily &vn✓o� . i+va I
// ry � . �
as..
. /O,�z�s' ,xT.n� /2 m � � 59 �
S vs i
L// .�s � // �� s.a � i
:sn' � .
' 1 (A L /< xa�� � ..�c5 I
. � ii7 ..,e>, ' � ,:s:. �2 P . Q :s,� � I
n Q � 4 iS „s � J 56 �
: � / .as»� /J ' � .
f) 40 fl�f /pfb '
ii n. - ss e�., . ,::3, 3 � 55 . I
`° ,� as .�: m �.z>.e /y � �• :
� � i
' �f"' ��m '� e4'co f . �
. , L A _N_ ' : ;
. / --� /'__ _ ' _ 9 . _.' i
. . . . ....--._ .._.-".. �—.—:
j
I
� CASE NO. 570�� I
� �:
87067
DATE: September 8, 1987 < <;; � �
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION � � , ^�� . � .� -�' ��
� �; `t �� :� � ; �:.�. -$'7 0 � �
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director ---.,..
Community Development Department
5UBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 87067
Applicant: Frank Ortiz
PROPOSAL:
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit
to develop a four unit apartment building in the R-3 (Multi-
Family) zoning restrict at 11217 Wright Road, Lynwood, CA.
FACTS:
1. Source of Authority.
Section 25-4.5 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that
a Conditional Use Permit be obtained for any residential
development in the R-3 zone.
2. Property Location.
The subject property is located on the west side of Wright
Road between Elmwood and Beechwood Avenues. (Refer to
attached Location Map.)
3. Property Size. ,
The subject property consists of one rectangular lot. The �
lot is approximately 50 feet wide and two hundred (200') �
feet deep. The total area is 10,000 sq. ft. �
4. Existing Land Use. I
i
The subject property is presently occupied by a single I
family residence and accessory structures. The single family �
dwelling and accessory structure will be removed prior to �
construction of the proposed development. The surroundinq
land uses are as follows:
i
North - Duplex East - Manufacturing I
5outh - Single-Family West - Residential i
5. Land Use Designation. �
The General Plan designation for the subject property is �
Multi-Family, while the Zoning description is R-3. The �
surrounding land use designations '
are as follows: j
General Plan: Zoning:
i
North - Multi-Family North - R-3 �
South - Multi-Family South - R-3 �
East - Industrial East - R-M
West - Multi-Family West - R-3 �
i
6. Project Characteristics: �
The applicant proposes to build a, two-story, four unit '
apartment building which will consist of four (4) 3 bedrooms, �
two (2) baths units, and two (2) two-car garages (Refer to ,
attached plans).
i
_ i
A six foot (6') high block wall or fence will be constructed
along the perimeter of the lot, except in the twenty (20')
ft. setback in which the wall will not exceed four (4') ft.
in height.
A minimum of twenty-five (25�) percent of the site area will
be comprised of:landscaped open space with an automatic
irrigation system.
The total height of the principal building does not exceed
thirty-five (35').
7. Site-Plan Review
On August 27, 1987, the Site-Plan Review Committee evaluated
the proposed development and recommended approval by the
Planning Commission subject to specific conditions.
8. Zonina Enforcement History.
None of record.
9. Public Response.
At the time of preparation of this report, no comments have
been received.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
1. Consistency with General Plan.
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning
classification (R-3) and the General Plan designation +
(Multi-family). Therefore, the granting of the Conditional I
Use Permit No. 87067 will not adversely affect the General
Plan. �
2. Site Suitability. +
�
The subject property is adequate in size and shape to I
accommodate the proposed development relative to proposed ,
density, bulk of the structures, parking, wall fences, �
driveways and other development features required by the i
Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, the subject property is
adequately served with the required public utilities and I
offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility. (
3. Compliance with Development Standards. �
�
The proposed development meets all the Development Standards I
required by the Zoning Ordinance regarding off-street �
parking; front, side, and rear yard setbacks; lot coverage, I
height; unit size; and density. �
4. Compatiblity.
The proposed development is surrounded by multi-family_zoned �
property; therefore, the project will be compatible with I
current and future development in the area. The base density
within the R-3 Zone (18 units/acre) would allow the i
development of 4 units on the property, therefore the
proposal does not exceed the density allowed by the Zoning �
Ordinance. '
I
�
�
i
5. Conditions of Approval.
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site-Plan Review Committee, will not have
a negative effect on the values of the surrounding
properties or interfere with or endanger the public health,
safety or welfare.
6. Benefits to Community.
The proposed development will aid in aesthetically upgrading
the neighborhood and will act as a catalyst in fostering
other high quality development. Furthermore, the development
will add favorably to the City's housing stock.
7. Environmental Assessment
This development is categorically exempt from the CEQA
requirements as amended (Section 15303, Class 3).
RECOD'II�iENDATI ON :
Staff respectfully r2quests that after consideration the Planning
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2146:
1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No.
87067, is categorically exempt from the provisions of
the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended (Section 15303,
Class 3).
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 87067, I
subject to the stated conditions and requirements.
i
�
�
i
�
I
i
�
Attachments: �
1. Location Map. I
2. Plans �
3. Resolution No. 2146 I
I
i
�
�
i
�
I
�
�
REVGPLAN: 87067CUP I
I
+
I
, f
f
_ i
87067cup
RESOLUTION NO. 2146
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 87067 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
FOUR (4) UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING AT 11217
WRIGHT ROAD, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, IN THE R-3
(MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL).ZONE.
WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law,
conducted a public hearing on the subject application;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all pertinent
testimony offered at the public hearing;
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for any
development in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone.
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines as follows:
A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size
and shape to accommodate the structures,
parking, walls, landscaping, dribeways and other
development features required by the Official
2oning Ordinance. �
B. The structures, as proposed, or modified, �
subject to conditions, will not have a negative !
effect on the values of surrounding properties i
or interfere with or endanger the public health,
safety, or welfare. i
C. The site will be developed pursuant to the �
current zoning regulations and site plan submit-
ted and approved by the Site Plan Review Commit- �
tee. �
D. The proposed development will aid in i
aesthetically upgrading the surrounding area. �
E. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will +
not adversely affect the General Plan. I
Section 2.The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood �
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, �
hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 87067, provided the I
following conditions are observed and complied with at all
times: �
I
i
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS ��
I
1. The proposed development shall comply with all I
applicable regulations of the Lynwood Municipal
Code, the Uniform Building Code and the Uniform Fire �
Code. '
i
I
i
�
'
�
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject
site or structures thereon, shall be first reported
to the Community Development Department, Planning
Division, for review of said Conditional Use Permit.
3. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a
Statement of Acceptance within fifteen (15) days
from the date of approval of this Resolution by the
Planning Commission. Signing this statement
implies that applicant or his representative has
read, understands and aqrees to the conditions of
the Resolution.
' Plannina Division Conditions
4. In order to best provide for the residents of the
development and their children, the developer must
provide play equipment in teh landscape area to the
rearr. The type of equipment shall be approved by
the Director of Planning.
5. Provide notes on plans showing the type and size of
physical separation between the parking and play
area.
6. All construction and improvements shall be in
strict accordance with zoning, building, and all
otherr codes and ordinances of the City of Lynwood.
i
7. All trash storage areas shall be enclosed within an �
area by a wall not less than six (6) feet in height '
as approved by the Building Division.
8. A minimum twenty-five (25�) percent of. the lott i�
area shall be landscaped and an automatic, '
irrigattion system shall installed. �
I
9. A landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning j
Division for approval prior to issuance of building �
permits. Landscaping shall include trees, shrubs • �
and ground cover. Trees shouls be fifteen (15) j
gallon minimum, shrubs shall be five ((5) gallon '
minimum. ;
i
i
10. No principal building on the site shall exceed a �
height of thirty-five (35') feet; '
I
11. A six (6') foot high masonry wall shall be provided �
along the perimeter of the project site, except �
within the twenty foot (20') front yard. In this �
frontage, the wall shall not exceed a height of 4 ;
ft., measured from top of curb or 3 ft., on the '
driveway side, if said driveway is adjacent to the i
next property's driveway. i
12. The addresses of the apartments shall be submitted �
to the Planning Division prior to occupancy.
13. Apartment numberrs shall be minimum of four (4) �
inches in height and shall be contrasting in color
to the background.
i
14. The parking area shalll have sufficient i
illumination for security; however, all outdoorr
lighting shall be directed away from adjacent i
streets and properties. '
�
I
i
I
15. A Demolition Permit shall be obtained from the
Building Division prior to removal of the
structures.
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITION5
16. If security bars are placed on bedroom windows, at
least one window for each bedroom shall have quick
release mechanisms that do not require a key or
any special knowledge to operate (UBC Sec. 1204).
17. Provide smoke detectors for each unit. (UL and
State Fire Marshal approved type).
18. Provide one (1) approved 2A type fire extinguisher
within 75 ft. travel distance on each floor.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
19. Dedicate a five (5') wide strip of property along
Wright Road. Respect setback to proposed property
line.
20. Provide an irrevocable offer of dedication for 3'
three foot wide strip of property along Wright
Road.
21. 5ubmit a grading plan prepared and signed by a
registerred Civil Engineer. Property is located
within 100 year flood zone area. Pad elevations
shall be 1 foot above flood level zone per flood I
boundary map. Also conform to all applicable codes
per Section 12 1/2 of Lynwood Municipal Code. �
Building above flood level will require �
substantial amount of fill,. therefore, suggest �
alternative methods of design to minimize amount ;
of livable space at ground level. !
�
22. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk along Wright Road.
i
�
23. Close existing drive approach and construct �
proposed drive approaches per City standards on i
Wright Road.
24. Construct (2) two wheelchair ramp at northwest and �
southwest corners of Wrightt Road and Sanborn
Avenue.
25. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be i
connected separately. Construct laterals as
necessary.
26. Install one (1) 24" box street trees per City of �
Lynwood standards along Wright Road. Species to be i
Flowering Plum. A permit to install the trees is i
required by the Engineering Division. Exact I
locations of the trees(s) will be determined at '
27. Regrade parkway and landscape.with grass. �
I
28. Provide and install one (1) marbelite strreet pole i
with light fixtire, undrground services and �
conduits: �
r
I
�
;
i
29. Underground all utilities.
30. A permit from the Engineering Division is required
for all off-site improvements.
31. Reconstruct existing northerly drive approach and
align driveway to provide separate drive
approaches between adjoining owners.
Section 3. The Community Development Department has
determined that the proposed project is categorically exempt
from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as
amended (Section 15303, Class 3).
Section 4. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered
to the applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 1987, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
1
ABSENT: �
I
ABSTAIN: �
i
I
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson �
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: �
i
i
i
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
Community Development Dept. General Counsel ,
i
i
I
�
t l
I
!
I
(
i
I
i
Resolution:2146 !
I
i
LOCATIOI� I�IAi�
�
NEET /9 . � � � � . . .
p
� ��5� O III)O ..�) ' � .
�, ?/ . h i ' e . � .
„� �� _
' ���m N 8 .�: �e 'a _ _ _ \ . ' .
. . p� � y� ,.» ' _"
o /! ,��.,� � . I � 3.s6e � �
j '.� "D 8 � 7 _ — ,,,m , .
� � V
� , /A � � ,. �� ,; �; .
0
uis� ... e Y
� � /7 ...a� o S• __—_ �� —_—'�n>'^ � �u:e –
j 4 , .s. �� np+'ow Q ~
V ^ Q .�i � J9[9�� '
� p ie,��-� . R 8— b �. ;�;�> o � �
{� O/O SOTSO }I O�i�6 ' O\ r .
V� I I _ �I�i� � /M.(1 SO p��TN /cV � "~
ry Y O� I � YS N FO }J � ti�I��l y �' I � p X _ 1 ' I
' I I , 1N' � V .f �O '�I I m � "' �I ~ i , � l0 O ��� 0
uin � � p I
� " „ �� 0 3
8EEC41�UCaD ° 0 4ti � �vE.----<-- ' �
r in=� �0 � � ?
� Hf A .!1 y '
�. � �IN.Z/S I �°.I lixea tj y �C ., �
:O � p ZN 1 =�V � � J '���_o �� ioo _Li<ia C h I
� ��noe o� �:o� 0 O >
.., � ih=• 0 /!o � IOL04 o ' I �xzx �` I
b /1 � �
�in,. ` en,o „n� . .
o � � � ��.�, o ---- � ^ (� _,o i
�,. e ti ����e 67 . ` � . 1 I
1 . . zo�ast �I:x� 7 ia.i � '���� 1 °` ? f
. 0 ^ /7 �lia. b �'��� u � /!O I.:L .y,'G � Q
V „� ° � � S' � 3 �
•. � 1' IS116 L_/50� . O W
/6 b zcn.n — � — toas> �, 0 � � -
-- n» .ne ioi��r o ` . � I
.. B F. ,s ,.,., — -- ----.�-^ � �
I1 �„ .. p Zo0.67 � IOO.G7 � v
� c 6d o
zao.s/ E° � I
o Q u:.., o -- —L----� <
� b __—___� b �.:�• I eoo.fC ��v.
3 �
i . �� ,�, � " \ f
` w /! � , � f E �°. � � iso � 64 zs¢�z ���•+ $ ... �
— —r------- o ,�-• / o � I
— -r — " / ` I
b /I ..�v `� /SO v.ii` � _O. y ^^ ' .. �
o -- -, ' zs¢�i o .d, 8 .� c ��� � ` i
` ° — -- — �- 63 �° °` o ae'.�'r�
// i�.. _ iso _L — _Ta9J0 _� a 5 ' �
G . ��° J99.6J S C�TY a 'e — � a j
,`\ o _ --'� lii�r __ V � ��.i:: inr.� - � '
.
� 62 i0 __ �
i A eTiaTw � T— _tl—z�__—L__vc�_ . 1 �
� � � � ,,:., � ;;, ,9, s= 3 3a � � ,
: : � - �. � ��» s � 6i ,,,_�� �/ � ,
v = �' 'ie. v ' � � o � � — � — e�os $ �0 � 1 . I
1 . � _f ` p f ,�-.. „n,v `p o
AVE. S/'N2�71'W �OS T—u)oo—!l.JO--i�3ol0y y ` �..
2lTf.0/ ' O � •♦ O 5 �+ . 1 �
s0 � c0 So' SO i So w }Sf 60 — 7JO o� 6p i��o� .°� � ,�'�" w 1
= I o �__,�, �„>. � so .x3o> p
. �= o.. Iq ��$O � �•.�.• o � , .�sa el9.66 uD � ' � i
- : 26! ~ M . . ii'.�� ~ .
�i ,---- S9 -- e e 1 .�
i — '
i� � 5� .,,,< �,,,, . �� fcNa'�
$ /D 'f � o ,n�e iolo ...�:q �•� µ�ILL Rp6Et5 Z ��,
� b O y pIZ1 �L� /95.17
p iqna $ I Ir� /L101 �
n ,,: $ •� ira.�e ist.� ,,,�. ea �,�.� � g 1``�
__ _ .�_—__ �.56 h y3J'!r' � Kwo 1
i i ,,, nis�s T _' _ Twsis „ g Nao� � \.
--� — � O �$ 1,vi �S7 ••�ns. � �l.Sf I ^ 1
isis�r _ � _ _i»� _ � 1 � �
nc sea � �
is u�„ W �.»a an 3 /� a
B � � $ _�s _ l _ 1�33�5_ to \ / ,�,f� ,
/f ��.., J $ jS5 .,oe� a ivs.k z � ��
� 'w 1:
n V _vc �D .4]___ If.6 e
� ��+-• US.[e w
Ins� o %SO � vn p
Q ` /Hfiv � � tl3.ii..+"._. .. ...1� ....__. _ i� ^�� �
/j 'v w � � _!.
� ` _ _ _ _ __ ; I Ue.� �
a � i„�i �. 15� .� �i 1 ~ �o_.
'
1
, CASE NO. �Q�O���
�M H7O71
''
DATE: September 8, 1987 �. �,,_�, ,, :-, ,�
�';� `�.. s'i ±,� i � � � `� 6`�`l �'1� ��.
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
� ,�
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director i ���- ��;`��! ���_.
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 87071
Applicant: William Flores
PROPOSAL:
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to develop a
duplex apartment building at 11186 Carson Drive, in the R-3
(Multiple-Family Residential) zone.
FACTS:
1. Source of Authority.
Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Zoning ordinance requires that
a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to build or
relocate dwelling units in the R-3 zone.
Section 25-4.5 b 17 which allows for the development of
substandard-sized lots.
' 2. Property Location.
The. subject property consists of a single lot between
Le Sage Street and Century Blvd. (See attached Location Map.)
3. Property Size.
The subject site is rectangular in shape and is
approximately fifty feet (50') wide and one-hundred and
twenty-six (126') feet deep. The total area is
approximately 6,300 square feet. The site does not meet the
minimum lot size area (7,500 sq. ft.) for the subject zoning
designation.
4. Existina Land Use.
The property is presently vacant. The surrounding land uses
are as follows:
North - Multiple-Family East - Multiple-Family
South - Commercial West - Multiple-Family
5. Land Use Description.
The General Plan designation for the subject property is
Commercial, and the zoning designation is R-3 (Multi-Family
Residential). The surrounding land use designations are as
follows:
Disk 8:87071cup
.
General Plan Zonin
North - Commercial North - R-3
South - Commercial South - CB-1
East - Commercial East - R-3
West - Commercial West - R-3
6. Proiect Characteristics:
The applicant proposes to develop a duplex on site. The
development will consist of two, (2) two-bedroom units with
the required parking located at the rear of the property. A
six-foot (6') block wall fence will be built on the
perimeter of the lot, except in the front yard set back, in
which the maximum height is four (4') ft.
7. Site Plan Review
At its regular meeting on August 27, 1987, the Site Plan
Review Committee approved the proposed project, subject to
the conditions and requirements stated in the attached
Resolution.
8. Zonina Enforcement History
None of record. �
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION:
1. Inconsistency with General Plan
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing Zoning
classification (R-3) but inconsistent with the General Plan
designation (COmmercial). This inconsistency is expected to
be resolved upon completion of the General Plan update in
the City. Upon completion of the General Plan update, staff
is expected to recommend that the General Plan be amended
to reflect the existing land use trend and land use
designations, thereby resolving the existing inconsistency.
2. Site Suitability
The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the proposed development relative to structures, parking,
walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development
features required by the Zoning Ordinance. Although the
site does not meet the minimum size standards, Section 25-
4.5 b 17 allows development on substandard-sized lots.
3. Com atibility
The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of
multiple and single family residential developments;
therefore, the project will be compatible with the
development in the area.
i �
Disk 8:87071cup
I
I
�
I
, 4. Compliance with Development Standards
The proposed subject meets all of the development standards
required by the 2oning Ordinance with respect to parking;
front, side, and rear-yard setbacks; distance between
structures; lot coverage; open space and landscaping;
building height; unit size and density.
5. Conditions of Approval
The improvements as proposed; subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have
a negative effect on the values of the surrounding
properties or interfere with or endanger the public health,
safety or welfare.
6. Benefits to Community
The proposed development will aid in aesthetically upgrading
the neighborhood and will act as a catalyst in fostering .
other quality developments. Furthermore, the development
will add favorably to the City's housing stock and will
provide additional affordably-priced housing in furtherance
of the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan.
7. Environmental Assessment
This development is categorically exempt from the CEQA
requirements as amended Section 15303, Class 3.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning
, Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2147:
1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No.
87071, will not have a significant effect on the
- environment.
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 87071, subject to
the stated conditions and requirements.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map.
2. Plans.
3. Resolution No. 2147.
I
Disk 8:87071cup
87071
RESOLUTION NO. 2147
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 87071 TO CONSTRUCT TWO (2) UNITS IN
THE R-3 (MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTZAL ZONE, 11186
CARSON DRIVE, LYNWUOD, CA�
WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to
law, conducted a public hearing on subject application for a
Conditional Use Permit; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission carefully considered
all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for
development in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone.
Section 1.
The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as
follows:
A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size
and shape to accommadate the structures, parking,
walls, landscaping, driveways and other
development features required by the Zoning
Ordinance.
B. The grantirig of the proposed Conditional Use
Permit will not adversely affect the Lynwood
Gener3l Plan.
C. The structures as proposed, or modified, subject
to conditions, will not have a negative effect on
the values of surrounding properties or interfere
with or endariger the public health, safety or
welfare.
D. The site will be developed pursuant to the current
zoning regulations and site plan submitted,
reviewed and approved by the Site Plan Review
Committee.
E, The proposed development will add favorably to the
housing stock and will provide additional
p affordably priced housing in concert with the
policies of the Housing Element to the General
Plan.
( F. The proposed development will aid in aesthetically
i upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in
� fostering other quality developments.
{
i Section 2.
The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based
upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby
approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 87071, provided the
I , following conditions are observed and complied with at all times.
I
l
�
1
I.
, COMMUNZTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
` Departments.
2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement
of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands; and
agrees to the conditions of this resolution within fifteen
(15) days from the date of approval of said resolution by the
Planning Commission.
PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS:
3. All requirements of all City departments shall be met.
4. All City of Lynwood Municipal Code and Zoning Ordinance
requirements shall. be met.
5. The applicant or his representative, shall sign a Statement
of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and
agrees to the conditions of this resolution within fifteen
(15) days from the date of approval of said resolution by the
Planning Commission.
6. The total development will consist of two (2) residential
apartment units along with parking and other amenities.
7. A minimum of four (4) parking spaces shall be provided. At
least two (2) of the total parking spaces shall be covered.
8. A minimum if twenty-five percent (25%) of the lot shall be
landscaped and provided with an automatic irrigation system.
9. Apartment building and unit numbers shail be plainly visible
and shall be a minimum of four inches (4") in height and
shall be contrasting in color to the background.
10. The Community Development Department shall have the right of
reasonable inspection, as with any other business within the
City, for the purpose of protecting the general health,
safety and welfare. '
11. A trash enclosure shall be provided per Building Division
' standards.
12. All electrical and plumbing installation shall be performed
by a licensed contractor.
13. A landscape plan shall be submitted and approved prior to
receiving building permits.
f 14. No principal building on the site shall exceed a height of
thirty-five (35') feet.
�. 15. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved, and shall have
sufficient illumination for security.
j 16. Construction shall be completed within six (6) months from
j date of issuance of building permits.
�
i
I
I
1
�
,
�
�
17. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved.
18. FinaT building elevations, including materials of
construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the
Building Official prior to issuance of any building permits.
19. Before any building permits may be issued, the
applicant/developer shall pay $1.50 per square foot for
residential buildings to the Lynwood Unified School District,
pursuant to Government Code Section 53080.
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS:
20. If security bars are placed on bedroom windows, at least one
window for each bedroom shall have quick release mechanisms
that does not require a key or any special knowledge. U.B.C.
Sec. 1204.
21. Provide smoke detectors, (U.L. and State Fire Marshal
approved type.)
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS:
22. Provide an irrevocable offer of dedication for (5') five foot
wide strip of property along Carson Drive.
23. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered
Civil Engineer.
24. Construct (5) five foot wide sidewalk along Carson Drive.
25. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk along Carson Drive.
26. Construct a new drive approach per City standards as offset
driveway to keep approach within property.
' 27. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected
separately. Construct laterals as necessary.
28. Underground all utilities.
29. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all
off-site improvements.
Section 3. The proposed project is Categorically
Exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended
(Section 15303, Class 3).
Section 4 . A copy of this Resolution shall be delivered
to the applicant.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 8th day of 5eptember,
1987, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
_ NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN: .
I
,, ,
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
Community Development Department General Counsel
Resolution Disk: RES02147
\
I �(�LQ, 'ON 3S1/� j
V I
. I
- _-- —° - _ I
� i
Y i
i
SD
- — f
s a py - DO'OOS � � I
V
� I
: �zn = o 'd a y
�
y �
M � y Y N '
Z � ay
se
foi�F:
a5� `^ ^� o
0
aoi g ;
£ � � °� c
ei/ ' " � l
0 � eri n I
roi��� � �1ro �' Up I
b � �I
b
[p � P
' J� �� ZG
'£/ �, �- I
roi ,
�
si% i
roi o canes
� � � £6Dt OS - - �� OS Zfi 69 '
66 � (� (� ( � y c � " ' I
// A < 4 4 4 4 q O C 4
6i " �ezi �n �'szi izi ai zzi �zi ozi au �'vu� �
i
��„ � d d � �
66CY Of OS G669 �
U �
/ / �' /L ' OS Ol 6'6% -
37 t� 31 JN�
I / .�
m"
9 � ��QO/ 60� // /// Z// (// �// $// 9// �L//b . B GO'92/ W'9L/ L09Z/ y BO'9Z/ I052/ �
�, '� r a r o i ro "o� �o zv izi o� �o rn eei �I �
4 i 9 e i�a:o or os ro �' �` „� . �
. _ .. . . GO'9L/ C9 < < 2 � � : I
.. °.saoc0 0� �' CZ/ LL/ (�
oi i� .Z� �, n�� �, a ��a
��F& p es . . - � cc L [oszi �� c eo�vzi � SZ/ VLI �� � Ad
5 S ,{,, � �- ru�rr e b5, ��, � ;� s9 r s ;�^ . vs � B ss R . �
� ro � �' \� � � ' ei u'9ai n'
``"'�o� \ � � � �� b s i �s o o co o��� . . vn � ni
I �60L
� $ ILZ�GL7 6[7 OBZ /BZ PB7 LB2 y SqZ 9B7 " - Po I
I I ( u � 9 . LO 9// s . '<
N � i oF OFIW '/ / n� Sd � w' o o r
`'' � a os eoos� sr ��, - uo rii '^ •
�� ieiu os .. . . . s ioos O� — sYl9 . T
� p /f . = 69 O 4// (7 � � p 67� � ,
� � � � �J'9Ll y + •
£G a cs � o�,p�� � �u �� � oci �8i
. / ic i o R l „ w �' •
a . 6 oi zs o "o ��ti i� t' zi o n '�Ihiri o edi °g
1J FZ a N
� g 967 � 56t I6Z C67 762 /QZ 06Z E6Z BBZ LB n� �� ' �s e o r� � ��� o n�. Z�� p� ?
A , � � f D � � S W 0 �+ �(p'9L/ LO'9Z/ O LJ'9Z/ LO�flL/ � � OJ'92/ �t 1G2/ �
m U p A 5 '
� � ° ti $ e � � g e E 1S 3�dS 37 S
LO'9Zl LO'pL/ 4 LOC I �O" / � N V0�9 / N �s
a � z, �r o '^ t� a, a o «, �v, o y
bui o�iu_ P�ni �ii
[ �ii 0� r�ir ciil 0
' T cwc� os o zi n 66 0� aoi �'-'ori cvi � n .
pill �
C � o,� � G�. . �. � � - . (,, s vs A ' _ ° � Q / � f!1!l OCiil � �
' m ��N � 2 W C � s W s �" 9 4�+ L � 6 � 6 �� � O b C/ � u BO /I O' SL BO/ ' � SF/ S9/ m
�Q �Srti � r � Y @ a" � P ll! Y4 � rc i1 � 90ii rr r`
O �c> as es �� si Dta�! m�i�o�ee LO/ •�' 9f/ osi : r
39NS 37a ^ ��� r� � O r/ .� 90 ��,�� ,
9/ � 96 LL 90 LC/ C9/
�'
' . . ot 4 fn/ loJO . I
N � "� W �, w A� "o f �i �' ss � k o ee soi o o an Zbi "o
\ iz �z rai y i ��i wvi �osi �ri �ri o ri � o��$ � , oii! �' o���„ p �/,voii p�ii � p �
.
aas 6965 � S ei sr 3 0. �caigt roi . a er� �9f � o a
LO'32/ L092/ L092/ LO'9L/ �% iO9Ll C I062/ \
133d1S Yl /7/7 �
r�� �
clt�UV �IOIlt��01
.
iL; `_, t . .. . .. � .. . .. ' ... ' . . . � .. . ... ' _. '.
� �� .�� nb� ��i�' � � �
� �"�' � � � �.l $ . p 5 . .
1 t J i� �� i.. .: " �
DATE: September 8, 1987 ; ' `,
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION � , �.
�. ' ggpM; Vicente L..Mas, Director . •
Community Development Dept.. '
° SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT = No. 87075. ': ".
PROPOSAL: - .. . .
This is a amendment to the Zoninq Ordinance with.respect.to the �
. minimum distance requirement between pr.incipaT buiT3ing5 -:and
accessory buildings in residential zones in the City. ,...
� ' � � FACTS `
This proposal is initiated by . the Commuriity Development
Departmerit for the� Planning . Commission;.and•..City.:.:C'ouncil,.to . .
consider. If adopted, the ordinance would apply.;citywide-. to
properties .3n alI residential.zones. The'change.is ; and
will.not:significantly facilitate new development,.in,the City._�
i
ISSUES'AND ANALYSIS :, � I
' At present the mi:nimum distance between main,buildings and.:�:the ,, "�
accessory structures%buildings is five feet in "'all" residential i
• zones: However; with the five-foot distance,` one=hour. f;ire° : ;
wall must be provided on.the accessory buiLding; pursuant to the '
Uniform Building Code (UBC). If the distance is.merely changed '. I
to a minimum of six (6') feet, no fire wall.will:be required...' �.
The intent� of this. ordinance is to bring.the� minimum. distance I
requirement between main buildings :and `;accessory �
buildings/.s:tructures into conformance with:the requirement of:the. ?
Uniform Building Code,: . I
: . �
, EMVIRONMENT.ASSESSMENT ' �
. . i
' The proposal is cove,red by,the general.rulecthat there� is, ,, i
possibility that the ordinance amendment will a.significant !
effect on the environment; ther.efore; if'is ;to;the ;
provisions of_the State CEQA Guidelines,: as amended:;:�(Section., i
15061 b 3).. ',
�
•. '
���
• I
' �
' . . �
; V10:87075amd ,.: - ,..'; .' . : . ..
. . I
� " �
�
. • ' ' . j
. � . ' ` . • r _ . , . . _ . . .
. . - � ' � ' ' .. ' ' � .. ' ; .. .
'. .. RECOMMENDATION ° '
'',Staff respectfully request that, after consideratiori.; tHe
.. . Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. ,..
a. Finding.that the proposed amendment is..exempt;;from the
� provisions of the.State CEQA Guideline's; as:amended::.
b: Recommending that the : City Council .approve the
F'indings .in Resolution No. 2149;, waive`.reading .arid
; introduce`the proposed ordinance. "'
,. � U10s87075amd . . . .
� I
. •�
. �
i
�
' . '. I
87075
' RESOLUTION 2149
A RE50LUTION OF THE PLANNING CO[�'II�lISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOP-
TION OF AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 25, THE OFFICIAL
ZONING ORDINANCE, OF THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE,
WITH RESPECT TO THE MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN
ACCE550RY STRUCTURES AND MAIN STRUCTURES AND
ACCESSORY 5TRUCTURES AND OTHER ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
IN THE RESIDENTIAL ZONES
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
did, pursuant to law, conduct a public hearing on a proposed
amendment to the Lynwood Municipal Code with respect to the above
referenced subject;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing;
and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has determined
that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of
the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended;
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines as follows:
A. The proposed amendment will be consistent with
the objectives and the development policies of the
City of Lynwood.
B. The proposed amendment will not unreasonably
constrain the use of property by landowners and
developers.
C. The proposed amendment will not adversely af�ect the
General Plan.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby
recommends City Council adoption of the proposed amendment.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of September, 1987, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
V1O:Reso2149 �
�
87075
= APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
Community Development Dept. General Counsel
V10:Reso2149
i
ORDINANCE NO.
' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD AMENDING CHAPTER 25, THE OFFICIAL ZONING
ORDINANCE, OF THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE WITH
RESPECT TO THE MINIMUM DISTANCE OF ACCESSORY
STRUCTURES FROM THE MAIN STRUCTURES AND ACCESSORY
STRUCTURES FROM OTHER ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN THE
RESIDENTIAL ZONES "
THE CITY £OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES HEREBY FIND,
RESOLVE AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 25, Section 25-4.6 "Accessory
. Structures" is hereby amended as follows:
"g. Detached Accessory Structures.
o "3. A detached structure shall maintain a minimum six (6')
foot separation from the main structure. Accessory
structures shall maintain a minimum setback of six (6')
feet from each other."
Section 2. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection,
subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of of this
ordinance, or the application thereof to any person or place, is
for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
ordinance or its application to other persons or places.
The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted
this ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision,
sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the
fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences,
clauses, phrases, or portions, or the application thereof to any
person or place, be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
' First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said
City held on the day of , 1987, and
finally adopted and ordered published at a meeting
of said Council held on the day of
' , 1987, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Paul Ei. Richards II, Mayor
V10:87075ord '
ATTEST:
Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk
- APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
. Community Development Dept. General Counsel
V10:87075ord
`
�� � �, _ � ' � �� f��l�, -
,,
. , > , �
, _. . .....;� � �
^ ;_ , ,._, �� 0`l �
�.;. .. . . _ ___
DATE: September 8, 1987
- TO: PLANNING COMMI$SION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
- Community Development Dept.
SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - No. 87076
PROPOSAL:
This is a amendment to the Uniform Fire Code and the Lynwood
Municipal Code with respect to prohibiting the above ground
storage of flammable and combustible liquids in the City of
Lynwood.
FACTS
This proposal is initiated by the Lynwood Fire Department
for Planning Commission and City Council consideration. If
adopted, the ordinance would apply citywide.
ISSUES AND.ANALYSIS
Because of recent legislation which imposes strict requirements
on the underground storage of hazardous materials, business
• persons are now interested in installing above ground tanks. .The
underground storage or flammable and combustible liquids has
proven to be exceedingly safe method, according to the Assistant
Fire Chief.
From a fire protection standpoint, underground tanks are safe
because:
- 1. They are not exposed to variations in temperature,
' causing expansion/contraction and high vapor pressures.
2. They are not subject to physical damage.
3. Related piping are not damaged, thereby releasinq the
� contents.
' The Assistant Fire Chief has advised that above ground storage
tanks can be a safe method of storing flammable liquids provided
proper protection is provided. However, above ground tanks are
exposed to variations in temperature, and related piping is
- subject to damage. Also, it is during loading and unloading
" operations that spills occur and may ignite, thereby creating a
severe fire exposure problem to other tanks.
Because of the incompatibility of the flammable and oxidizable
materials and the exposure problems, the Assistant Fire Chief is
requesting that the above ground storage of flammable and
'' combustible liquids within the City be prohibited.
" V10:87076amd '
S
EMVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT
The proposal is covered by tYie general rule that there is no
possibility that the ordinance amendment will have a significant
effect on the environment; therefore, it is not subject to the
provisions of the 5tate CEQA Guidelines, as amended (Section
15061 b 3).
•- RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully request that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2150:
a. Finding that the proposed amendment is exempt from the
provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended.
b. Recommending that the City Council approve the
Findings in Resolution No. 2150, waive reading and
introduce the proposed ordinance.
V10:87�076amd
`
. 87076
• RESOLUTION 2150
A RE50LUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
� CZTY OF LYNWOOD RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOP-
TION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE AND
CHAPTER 12 OF TAE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE WITH
RESPECT TO PROHIBITING THE ABOVE GROUND STORAGE
OF FLAMMABLE AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS IN THE CITY
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
did, pursuant to law, conduct a public hearing on a proposed
. amendment to the Lynwood Municipal Code with respect to the above
' subject; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing;
and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has determined
that the project is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines, as amended (Section 15061 b 3).
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines as follows:
A. The proposed amendment will . be consistent with
the objectives and the development policies of the
City of Lynwood.
�` B. . The proposed amendment will not landowners °
constrain the use of property by
developers.
C. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the
General Plan.
Section.2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby
recommends City Council adoption of the proposed amendment.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of September, 1987, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
, NOES:
` ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
, V10:Reso2150
87076
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
� Community Development Dept. General Counsel
, V10:Re5o2150
" ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD AMENDING SECTION 79.501 OF THE UNIFORM
FIRE CODE AND SECTION 12.4 OF THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL
CODE WITH RESPECT TO PROHIBITING THE ABOVE GROUND
STORAGE OF FLAMMABLE AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES HEREBY FIND,
- RESOLVE AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The last sentence in subsection (a) of
Chapter 12.4 is hereby amended as follows:
� ��(a) *** No flammable or combustible liquids'shall be
stored anywhere within the city limits."
Section 2. Section 79.501 of the Uniform Fire Code is
hereby amended to read as follows:
"Section 79.501. The storage of flammable and combustible
liquids in above ground tanks outside of buildinqs is
prohibited within the limits established by law as the
limits of districts in which such storage is prohibited"
Section 3. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection,
subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of of this
ordinance, or the application thereof to any person or place, is
for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
ordinance or its application to other persons or places.
The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted
this ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision,
�" sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the
fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences,
clauses, phrases, or portions, or the application thereof to any
,
person or place, be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said �
City held on the day of , 1987, and
finally adopted and ordered published at a meeting
of said Council held on the day of
, 1987, by the following vote:
V10:87076ord
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Pau1 H. Richards II, Mayor
ATTEST:
Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
Community Development Dept. General Counsel
. a
V10:87076ord
Practical Approaches Location, General Upcoming Programs of
to Preparing Schedule, and Fee Information Interest
and Revising a General • Working with Consultants on MiramarvSheraton Hotel Visitors are not permitted at this For further information Hazardous Materials Liability
Plall . General Plan Revisions 101 Wilshire Boulevard program. con[act MaBel Collins, Program Miramar-Sheraton Hotel, Santa
Considerations to weigh in Santa Monica, Califomfa Refund Policy Representative, Public Policy Monica, Ocrober 15, 1987
� deciding on whether to hire a IWilshire Room—comfortable A service char e of $20 is with- Program, UCLA Extension,
consultant; selectin a consultant; classroom-st le seatin 1 g Wipeouts and Their Mitigation
This course iocuses on rhe g Y 9 held from all refunds Ifull refund 10995 Le Conte Avenue, The Fifth Annual Donald G.
p�actical aspects of preparing role of the consultant versus role Tuesday, 9 am-4:30 pm, ranted if course is canceled or Room 731, Los Angeles,
o( the staff; dealing with the g Hagman Commemorative
and �ewsrng a gene�al plan to September 29 rescheduledl. Re uest must be CA 90024 (213) 825-7885.
scope of work and cost overrun � �1 �Program, UCLA Faculty Center,
meetlocal needs U�hile satislying IRegistration and continental received in writin b Enroll now b mail October 29-30, 1987
problems. 9 Y Y
r;ie �equi�er;�2nis oI state la��v, breakfast, 8:15-9 am) September 22, 1987. using form attached. For
I � Ethics in Urban Planning
% he sessions a�e designed Io�, Pa�ticipants are encouraged to Law 869 Income Tax Deductions for additional applications, use Professor Martin Wachs, Head,
i local planners and consultants bring copies of their genera/ plans Fee: 5158 (includes book, course Educational Ex enses photocopy or separate sheet
a invoNed in or about to and general plan work programs P Urban Planning Department,
materiats, continental breakfast, `� Please consult the appropriate givirig all information requested GSAUP, UCLA
unde�take comprehensive for group discussion during lunch and lunch) EDP L1684M on form.
time. tax agency lstate/federal) for UCLA Faculty Center, December4,
qeneialplan �evisions. Enrollment By Phone detailed information. �987
Topics include: As part of tne course ma[erials,� You can enroll by using parking �
participants receive the 1987 MasterCard or VISA. Call Parking space will be available in
• Legal Requirements for the edition of Cali/omia Land Use and (213) 825-9971. the Nliramar-Sheraton Hotel ----------------------------------------
General Plan , Planning Law by Daniel J. Curtin, g Mail
Jr. ISolano Press) and a 780- a e parking lot. When full, altemative Mail Application to� Enrollment IPlease Print) Pall 1967
Statutory and case law p� Complere and rewrn the enroll- parking is available acress Ihe
re uirements ior eneral lan course syllabus. , "
4 9 P men� form provided. Enrollment street in the restaurant parking EDP No. Course Title and Number Fee
content; rer,uirements for adoption Instructional Staff must be accompanied by the full- lot at 2nd St. and Wilshire Blvd.
and ainendment; adequacY (ee. Please make checks payable usgqM Practical Approaches to Preparing and 5i58
ciiecklist; legal challenges and panielJ Cu�tin, Jr., Attomey at to: The Regents of the University Parkino tee�is S5 for all day. ae��stn9 a �eoerai Pian 869 �
standards o� judicial review_ �aw, fvlcCutehen, Doyle, Brown oi Cali(ornia.
•Meeting General Pfan and Fnersen, Walnut Creek; Confirmation 'SocialSecuntyNumber ❑ Pleasecheckboxi/newdddiess
Adequacy Tests specializes in land use law, bVhen paying by phone or mail,
Data and analysis; policy; repiesenting both private and please allow enough time io Name IFtrsvnn�ddie/�asil ❑ Maie 1 �emaie Title/POSiiion
implementation program; Gencral publlc clients. receive your enrollment -
Plan diac7rams; standards o( J Laurence Mintier, Planning con(irmation and bring it with . Organiza�ion Atldress
population density and buildiny Considtant, Laurence Mintier and Y���- If you need 2dditional time . - � �
intensity; internal Consistency. AssoCialeS, Sacramento; (ormerly for company authorization, you Ciry/Siaie/ZIP Area Code/Daytime Phone
• General Plan Preparation and with the Govemor's Office of may reserve your space by � C Check enclosed payuble m�. The Rcgoms ol �he Universiiy ot Cnlih;�rnin
Revision Process Planning and Research and telephoning MaBel Collins at the -
Public Polic Pro r�m, Cna�gc: _ _ _
Steps In the general ptan revision principal author of �he General Y 9� �— —
f � ❑ Masterc;,rd
I process; citizen participation; Plan Guidelin2; and 1982 revisions (213) 815-7II85. �❑ VISA n4o/vr
environmenml review; June Catalano, Director of nwho�izinc� si�naw�e � Expi�a�ion Uatc
intergovemmen�al coordination. Communiry Development, Ciry of Mail �o: P.O. Box 24901, Dep�. K, UCLA Extensiun, Los ,4r,geics, Ca e0o2a
• Making the General Plan Work Laguna Beach • 6y fteg<;nial authority, your Sodai securiry nurnbe� �s requr.s�od in order io ver�ly
CalCUla�ing holding C�paCity Of Y�ur idenlity lor accur.ne record ker,pin<�. Your providinp the numbei is volmvaiy-
the plan; working oul thejObs- e� ..,���;,� ,v��n ,m�:����t;r�.m,�ii,,w�.,�,nw���c�s,� .�e�-, r„�c:�r�„���;,�x,.:���„�m�������,.,��
housin � .,<< v i � m,: w��.»�.,n
J b818f10E; BI81111[� � au ot iis �mi�cros. tmicalmes. o� m:siires on tlm bnsis ol �:�u,. coiu�. nauon:tl mi� sct. s�r.uni oncnineon.
prOjeCt@d grOwlh t0 pUbliC uee o�n.i rr�.i n ncs� �� ryiicw;v. �iv'.i �� ni i'iv� r�.,s � v�. i� .:i.ii l� i.
co. �sE.i n�i m i i nan, uein..o� a � o.�u� oi n,� oir-e m c i n �nis� o,��� ��.��i ai e,i .- ro��. P��,.�
(acilities capacities. ,:�n in�i e�s> > i�, � ,
_ -(6 nilouev'mon on sua:ial s..viees lo� bnmlieuupn�f se�donis Ivn¢a n� tDDI.
._t � ;1
MINIJTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA
SEPTEMBER 8, 1987
OPENING CEREMONIES �
, A. Call to order.
A regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the
City of Lynwood was called to order by Chairperson
Kanka on the above date at 7:30 p.m., in the Council
Chambers of the Lynwood City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road,
Lynwood, California 90262. ,
B. Flag Salute.
Commissioner pove led the Pledge of Allegiance.
C. Roll Call.
Present: Commissioner Lena Cole-Dennis
Commissioner ponald Dove
Commissioner Kanka
Commissioner Pryor
Commissioner Reid
It was motioned, seconded and passed that
Commissioners Raymond and Willis be excused because
of illness.
Also present:
Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Dept.
Dorethea Tilford
Acting Senior Planner
Jim Devore
Associate Civil Engineer
Henry S. Barbosa, Esq.
, D. New General Counsel
The Chairperson introduced Mr. Barbosa to the
Commission.
Mr. Barbosa remarked that he was pleased that his
firm had been chosen to represent the City of
Lynwood. He said one of the other partners in the
firm would probably attend the Planning Commission
meetings.
E. Certification of Agenda Posting by City Clerk.
Chairperson Kanka asked if the agenda had been duly
posted, in accordance with the provisions of the
Brown Act.
Mr. Mas responded in the affirmative.
Minutes3:PCMins98
1
F. Approval of Minutes: July 14, 1987 and August 11,
1987
Upon motion by Commissioner Pryor, second by
Commissioner Dennis, the Minutes of Ju1y 14, 1987,
were approved as submitted. Motion carried by
unanimous vote.
With respect to the Minutes of August 11, 1987,
Commissioner Dennis did not volunteer to chair the
meeting--she was elected by the other Commissioners.
Commissioner pove replied that he had called staff
and explained that he could not be present at the
meeting of August 11.
- Upon motion of Commissioner Pryor, second by
Commissioner Dennis, the Minutes of August 11, 1987,
were approved as corrected.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Special Permit for Dancina and Live Entertainment No. 87056
11020 Atlantic Avenue (Oscar and Patricia Casillas)
Mr. Mas presented the staff report indicating as follows:
This applicant is requesting a Special Permit to add Dancing
and Entertainment at the existing restaurant and cocktail
lounge. The matter has been continued since July 15, 1987.
Staff respectfully request �that the Planning Commission
not open the public hearing and.dismiss Case No. 87056 without
prejudice, in order to allow the applicant to meet the
requirements for off-street parking. He was required to
provide a certain number of parking spaces in order to be
granted a Conditional Use Permit to allow dancing and live
entertainment at an existing cocktail lounge.
Staff has not yet received the necessary information needed
evincing that the applicant can meet the parkinq standards.
Therefore, staff suggests that the matter be dismissed
without prejudice.
Mr. Barbosa interjected that the Municipal Code provides a
mechanism whereby the applicant cannot apply for a permit
before a year, if the application is denied. If the
Commission is desirous in having the applicant come back
at a later date, the proponent may want to withdraw the
application and avoid the impact of the one-year rule, the
attorney explained.
As an alternative, Mr. Barbosa suqgested that the Commission
may deny the application and close any opportunity for the
one-year rule.
The attorney advised that dismissal without prejudice is
probably not the most desirable rule to follow, in that it
provides a means of evading the one-year rule of the Code
which states that applications which are denied cannot be
submitted again for one year.
Minutes3:PCMins98
2 ,
,
,
Mr. Barbosa suggested that the Commission hear from the
proponent; if he cannot meet the standards, then the
application should be denied. Then, the applicant would not
be able to apply for the dancing and live entertainment
� permits for one year.
If the applicant does not want to have the one-year rule
' imposed against him, then he may be allowed to withdraw his
application, explained Mr. Barbosa.
The attorney advised that it would be appropriate to hear
from the applicant before making a decision.
Mr. Barbosa asked staff if the applicant was advised to
attend the hearing.
Ms. Tilford responded that the applicants were mailed a copy
of the staff report which included the recommendation that
the Planning Commission dismiss the matter without
prejudice.
Mr. Barbosa suggested that the Commission instruct staff
' to inform the applicant of the attorney's opinion with
respect to this case, and allow the applicant to come
forward. The attorney said the applicant may have believed
the matter would be dismissed without prejudice, and the
one-year rule would not apply.
The attorney suggested that the matter be continued to the
� next regular meeting of the Planning Commission, in order
that the applicant will be given an opportunity to be heard.
It was moved by Commissioner pove, seconded by Commissioner
Pryor, that Conditional Use Permit No. 87056 be continued to
the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
October 13, 1987. The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dennis, Dove, Kanka and Reid
NOES: Commissioner Pryor
ABSENT: Commissioners Raymond and Wi11is
ABSTAIN: NONE
2. Special Permit for Dancina and Live Entertainment-Case No. 87059
12001 Atlantic Avenue (Irene Pena)
Ms. Tilford presented the staff report indicating as
follows:
The applicant is requesting a Special Permit for Dancing and
Live Entertainment at an existing cocktail lounge, 12001
Atlantic Avenue, Lynwood, CA., in the CB-1 (Controlled
Business) zone.
Staff is also requesting that this case be dismissed without
prejudice, because the revised site plan for the proposed
use has not been submitted to the Planning Division.
Mr. Barbosa replied that his instructions in the previous
case (No. 87056) would apply in this matter as well.
Minutes3:PCMins98
3 ,
It was moved by Commissioner Pryor, seconded by
Commissioner pove, that Conditional Use Permit No. 87059 be
continued to the next regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on October 13, 1987. The motion carried by the
following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dennis, Dove', Kanka and Pryor
NOES: Commissioner Reid
ABSENT: Commissioners Raymond and Willis
ABSTAIN: NONE
Staff was instructed to inform the applicants in Case Nos.
87056 and 87059 of the attorney's opinion with respect to
the dismissal without prejudice.
3. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87057
12017 Atlantic Avenue (Leonel Vasquez)
Ms. Tilford presented the staff report indicating as
follows:
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to operate a mini-market with off-sale alcoholic
beverages at 12017 Atlantic Avenue, Lynwood, CA.
Staff is requesting that the Planning Commission not open
the public hearing and continue Conditional Use Permit Case
No. 87057 to October 13, 1987. The revised site plans have
been submitted to the Planning Division, but not in time for
for the September 8 meeting of the Planning Commission.
It was moved by Commissioner Pryor, seconded by Commissioner
' Dove, that Conditional Use Permit No. 87057 be continued to
the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
October 13, 1987. The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dennis, Dove, Kanka, and Pryor
NOES: Commissioner Reid
ABSENT: Commissioners Raymond and Willis
� ABSTAIN: NONE
4. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87060
3562 Beechwood Avenue (Maria Briseno)
Ms. Tilford presented the staff report indicating as
follows:
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
� Permit to develop a two-story triplex at the rear of an
existing single family dwelling at 3562 Beechwood Avenue,
Lynwood, CA.
Staff is requesting that the Planninq Commission continue
Conditional Use Permit No. 87060 to the next regular meeting
of the Planning Commission on October 13, 1987. Staff has
received the revised site plans but was unable to review
them in time for the September 8 meeting of the Planning
Commission.
` Minutes3:PCMins98
t -
i ;
' 4
I.
I
i
I
I
It was moved by Commissioner pove, seconded by Commissioner
Pryor, that Conditional Use Permit No. 87060 be continued
to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
October 13, 1987. The motion was carried by the following
vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dennis, Dove, Kanka, Reid and Pryor
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: Commissioners Raymond and Willis
ABSTAIN: NONE
Mr. Mas requested that Item No. 12 be moved to be heard
before Item No. 5. Item No. 12 was initiated by the Fire
Department and the Fire Chief is present to answer any
questions; however, the Fire Department is in a state of
emergency at this time and the Fire Chief is required to
be at the Station.
5. Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Case No. 87076
The Director presented the staff report indicating as fol-
lows:
This is a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance in order
to preclude or prohibit above-ground fuel storage tanks in
the City.
The Fire Department is requesting this ordinance amendment
' because of the inherent danqer of flammable and oxidizable
materials.
The proposed amendment is exempt from the State CEQA
Guidelines, as amended.
Fred Ripley, Acting Fire Chief, addressed the Commission on
behalf of the proposed amendment. He said the main reason
for the proposed ordinance is safety, because
below-ground storage of flammable liquids is much safer than
above-ground storage.
Mr. Ripley informed the Commission about the new state and
federal legislation which requires monitoring systems for
businesses which have below-ground storage. Mr. Ripley said
the monitoring systems are quite expensive and this has
caused industries to relocate to areas which permit above-
ground storage.
In response to Commissioner's Dove question pertaining to
leakage, Mr. Ripley responded that part of the new
legislation is that all below-ground tanks must have
monitoring wells or double containment where any leakage can
be contained.
� The Acting Fire Chief continued stating
that it is easier
l for someone to establish above-ground storage than
� underground storage. He said, since most of the
I industries are located on the westerly part of the City, and
with the prevailing westerly-easterly winds, any major fire
from the above-ground storage tanks could cause vapors and
I smoke to spread Citywide.
Chairperson Kanka opened the public hearing.
I
I Minutes3:PCMins9
I
�
I
� . 5
R
I
I
, Robert Frye, 12501 Alpine Avenue, Lynwood, CA., spoke in
support of the proposed amendment.
There being no further responses with respect to this matter,
Chairperson Kanka closed the public hearing.
Motion made by Commissioner Dennis, seconded by
Commissioner Reid to adopt Resolution No. 2150, "A
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
RECOMMENDING CZTY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE
UNIFORM FIRE CODE AND CHAPER 12 OF THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE
WITH RESPECT TO PROHIBITING THE ABOVE GROUND STORAGE OF
FLAMMABLE AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS IN THE CITY."
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dennis, Dove, Kanka, Pryor and
Reid
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: Commissioners Raymond and Willis
ABSTAIN: NONE
6. Tentative Parcel Map - Case No. 87051
3151-3153 Carlin Avenue (Cecilia Lobaton)
Ms. Tilford presented the staff report indicating as follows:
The applicant is reques�ting Tentative Parcel Map approval
for the purpose of consolidating four (4) separate parcels
into one parcel, in order to build fourteen (14) apartment
units at 3151-3153 Carlin Avenue, in the R-3 (Multiple Family
Residential) zone.
The Conditional Use Permit to build the 14 units was approved
by the Planning Commission in July, 1987, and one of the
conditions imposed was the recordation of a Parcel Map.
Staff's analysis of the proposed lot consolidation shows the
lots to be in character with existing residential
developments in the area. The site is compatible with the
Lynwood General Plan and the objectives, policies, and land
use specified in the General Plan. Therefore, staff requests
that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2141,
approving the Tentative Parcel Map No. 18957.
Chairperson Kanka opened the public hearing.
' Robert Frye, 12501 Alpine Avenue, Lynwood, CA., expressed
concern that there would be a traffic problem, even though
Carlin Avenue is a 40' wide street. Mr. Frye remarked that
additional units does not help the present overcrowded
schools.
There being no further comments for or against the proposal,
the public hearing was closed.
I � Minutes3:PCMins98
f
`
i
�
I
� ,
1 6
,, .
i
Commissioner Dennis asked whether the environmental
statement that the proposal will not have a significant
effect on the environment include the school overcrowding
condition.
Mr. Barbosa responded that the school district has been
notified. He further explained that a statute which became
effective this year that allows the school district to
impose an assessment on all developments; the consideration
of overcrowding has been considered by the school district.
With respect to environmental impacts, the attorney stated
that the comments are related to the project and the
surrounding areas, as opposed to the economic impact on the
school district.
' Mr. Mas responded that staff has received written comments
from the school district pertaining to residential develop-
ments.
There was a brief discussion about the Tentative Parcel Map
approval and the development.
The City Attorney interjected that the Tentative Parcel Map
and the Conditional Use Permit are approved at the same
time. He advised since the Commission has approved the
Conditional Use Permit subject to the applicant filing a
Tentative Parcel Map, which clears the title, the action on
the map at this point is almost ministerial; therefore, the
applicant probably thought she did not need to be present.
Mr. Barbosa stated that his office will be working with
staff regarding rules and guidelines with respect to an
applicant's non-attendance at the hearings.
' "There might be a risk involved, if the Commission decides
to continue an item because the applicant is not present,
the Director replied. He further stated that "if the time
goes beyond the 45-day limit, the permit may be deemed
approved."
Motion was made by Commissioner Reid and Seconded by
Commissioner Dennis to adopt Resolution No. 2141, "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP NO. 18957 TO COMBINE LOTS 1, 2, 3, AND 4, BLK. 14, BELLE
VERNON ACRES, M-B 9-196, BEING A REVERSION TO ACREAGE OF
PARCEL MAP 13252 PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 49, PAGE 38, IN
THE OFFICE OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER, CITY OF
LYNWOOD, STATE OF CALIFORNIA."
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dennis, Dove, Kanka and Reid
I NOES: Commissioner Pryor
ABSENT: Commissioners Raymond and Willis
ABSTAIN: NONE
I Minutes3:PUbhrg2
I
`.
i
i ,
` 7 ,
I
I
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS:
7. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87044
10115-10211 Long Beach Boulevard (Roger Alvarado)
• Mr. Mas presented the staff report indicating as follows:
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to operate a bona fide restaurant with beer and wine
at 10115-10211 Long Beach Boulevard, Lynwood, CA., in the
C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone.
The subject property is approximately 38,395 square feet in
area. The site was a pre-existing bakery and delicatessen
with on-sale and off-sale beer and wine. The building has
been vacant for approximately 3 years.
The use is consistent with the uses permitted in this zoning
district and the proposed restaurant would continue the
same type of use that exis,ted in the past.
The applicant requested, and was granted a Zoning Ordinance
adjustment to the required number of parking spaces. The
Code requires 76 for the proposed use; however,+ even after
demolishing a single family dwelling on the site, the
applicant could only provide 68 spaces which is a reduction
of 6%. Section 25-30.1 of the Zoning ordinance permits up
to a l0a reduction with the approval by the Director.
In staff's professional opinion, the development wi11 aid in
aesthetically improving the neighborhood by upgrading the
vacant building, thereby eliminating an unsightly use.
Staff received a written statement from the Lynwood
Sheriff's Station objecting to the sale of alcoholic
beverages.
' The proposal is categorically exempt from the provisions of
the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended (Section 15303, Class
3--Small Commercial Structures).
Staff is requesting that, after consideration, the Planning
� Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2125, approving
this application, subject to the stated conditions and re-
quirements.
' Chairperson Kanka opened the public hearing.
Roger Alvarado, 11126 Duncan Avenue, Lynwood, Calif., the
applicant, and Alfonso Avila, 9625 San Gabriel Avenue, South
Gate, CA., 90280, said they understood the conditions
imposed and would comply with each of them.
Mr. Alvarado said he is proposing to open an international
family restaurant; foods from Mexico, Puerto Rico, Guatemala
and other countries will be served with beer and wine.
Raymond Chavira, 11434 Plum Street, Lynwood, CA., addressed
the Commission in opposition to the proposed bona fide
restaurant. He mentioned that the proposed alcoholic
beverage ordinance has a 500 ft. distance requirement from
Minutes3:Pubhrg2
I $ I
,
I
any establishment selling alcoholic beverages. Mr. Chavira
• related information he received from Alcoholic Beverage
Control (ABC) with respect to the subject area (Census Tract
5403). . His information revealed that there are 6 on-sale
licenses allowed in the area, 10 are presently existing;
there are 5 off sale licenses allowed and 7 are presently
existing.
Under ABC's Rule 61.3, Mr. Chavira said ABC is empowered to
deny the application; and under that rule, Mr. Chavira
contends he will protest the application.
' Mr. Chavira queried the rationale for granting a Zoning
Ordinance adjustment for parking. He said this type
restaurant will seriously impact the residences and
schools in South Gate.
Robert Frye, 12501 Alpine Avenue, Lynwood, CA., addresse.d
the Commission stating that the proposed site for the
restaurant is a high crime area. He claimed this restaurant
could have an impact on other restaurants in the
Redevelopment Area. Mr. Frye requested that the application
be denied.
� Donna Johnson, 3028 Wisconsin, South Gate, CA., expressed
concern about the existing parking problem, debris and anti-
social behavior in front of the homes in the area
surrounding the subject site. Ms. Johnson presented
photographs of the area behind the subject property.
Charles Glenn, 3533 Carlin Avenue, Lynwood, CA., inquired
about the rationale for granting the 6°s parking
_ adjustment.
The Chairperson asked Mr. Mas to respond to Mr. Glenn's
' inquiry.
The Director responded that the proposed project merits the
' adjustment, per the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. He
further stated that the proposal is a. bona fide, fu11-
' service restaurant, which is exempt from the 300-foot
spatial requirement of our existing ordinance. The proposal
was reviewed on its own merits and the impacts of the
existing vacant building, and it was staff's professional
opinion that it would be in the�best interest of the City to
have a bona fide restaurant, of the type proposed by the
applicant, rather than a vacant building and problems
associated with vacant properties.
Mr. Mas continued by stating that many of the problems
associated with on-sale and off-sale establishments are
f derived from businesses which have been grandfathered in.
Until the proposed ordinance is adopted the City is limited
in its power to abate those establishments that are problems
in the community. In the subject application, a bona fide
restaurant must be primarily dedicated to food service, full
kitchen facilities, and Slo of the sales must be from food
service.
Mr. Barbosa suggested that the Mr. Alvarado might want to
rebut some of the comments, before the public hearing is
closed.
Chairperson Kanka invited the applicant to the podium for
rebuttal.
I
j Minutes3:Pubhrg2
i
�
I 9 �
Roger Alvarado, 11126 Duncan Avenue, Lynwood, CA., said he
intends to maintain a nice family restaurant and not a place
for vagrants. He reiterated that he plans to serve foods
from other countries, e.g., E1 Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico,
etc.
Alfonso Avila, 9625 San Gabriel, South Gate, CA., the
designer of the project, said the applicant has started
, preparinq to submit a parcel map to tie.all of the lots into
one parcel, which is one of the conditions of approval.
In response to Commissioner's Dove question, Mr. Mas
commented that the Code is quite specific on defining the
bona fide restaurant as opposed to any other type of on-sale
establishment. He said the businesses where there have been -
anti-social activities, crimes, etc., are long-standing
businesses. Mr. Mas continued by stating that the Lynwood
Muncipal Code does not have the "teeth" to enforce any
restrictions on the way the businesses existing prior to the
adoption of the existing ordinance are operating.
The Director commented that the applicant will be coming
before the Commission again, since one of the conditions
imposed is the filinq of a Parcel Map to tie all of the lots
toqether.
Mr. Mas explained that the sale of alcoholic beverages is an
ancillary use to the food sales.
Commissioner Pryor asked if the Director knew how much the
applicant would spend the project.
Mr. Mas responded that it would be substantial--in excess of
$100,000.
Chairperson Kanka closed the public hearing.
Motion was made by Commissioner pove, seconded by
Commissioner Pryor to adopt Resolution No. 2125, "A
' APPROVINONA CONDITIONALIUSECPEMRMITITO ALLOWETAETCONSTRUCTOON
AND OPERATION OF A BONA FIDE RESTAURANT, 10115-10211 LONG
PORTIONBOFLLOTRD25,LTRACTYNODE49R6BEDY�OODTSCALOFORNIAND A
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dennis, Dove, Kanka, and
Pryor
NOES: Commissioner Reid
ABSEMT: Commissioners Raymond and Willis
ABSTAIN: NONE
g, Tentative Parcel Map - Case No. 87053
11339-11341 Louise Avenue (DOnald Kittle)
Before the staff report was presented, Chairperson Kanka
Resoarce �Centeras anyonTherethwasudnoncresponsehefromsab�he
audience.
I
� Minutes3:Pubhrg
V 10 '
�
�
Mr. Mas explained that Mr. Gibbens has expressed an interest
in participating in the proceedinqs regarding Case No.
87053 and requested that an interpreter be provided for him.
Staff contacted Disabled Resource Center and an interpreter
was to have been at the meeting.
Mr. Gibbens submitted a statement which Mr. Barbosa read
into the record:
"I regret to inform you that my interpreter has not
shown up. I want to address what I feel our City
Government should do to protect its neighbors in some
way. I am one of the neighbors. I will do my best to
speak in spite of my speech defect and hearing impair-
ment. Please let me know when you do not understand
_ me. Will you7 I have several suggestions and recom-
mendations. Any one of you want to volunteer to speak
out for me7"
Mr. Barbosa suggested that the Commission hear from the
applicant and then provide Mr. Gibbens an opportunity to
make his statement. The attorney gave Mr. Gibbens a copy of
' the staff report.
Mr. Mas explained that Mr. Gibbens was in the Community
Development office and met with the staff person who
prepared the report. Mr. Gibbens reviewed the site plans
for the development, as well as the parcel map.
Mr. Mas presented the staff report indicating as follows:
The applicant is requesting Tentative Parcel Map approval to
merge two lots into one parcel, in order to construct 14
� apartment units, 11339-41 Louise Avenue, in the R-3
(Multiple-Family Residential) zone.
The site consists of two rectangular-shaped lots located on
the west side of Louise Avenue between Sanborn Avenue and
Century Boulevard. The site area is approximately 26,400
sq. ft.
The design of the proposed lot consolidation shows the
consolidated lots to be in character with existing
residential developments in the area. The proposal is
compatible with the General Plan designation of Multiple
Family Residential.
Staff requests that Tentative Parcel Map No.
18893 be
approved, subject to stated conditions and requirements.
Chairperson Kanka opened the public hearing.
f Hrent Kittle, 20292 Harpoon Circle, Huntington Beach,
I California, said he was aware of the conditions imposed and
would comply with each of them. He mentioned that.the two
existing dwelling units will be demolished.
1 Commissioner pove inquired about the landscape plan.
I Mr. Kittle remarked that he has submitted a landscape plan
to the Planning Division, and that the landscaping is
essential for him, in that he is in the nursery (botanical)
business.
I
( Minutes3:Pubhrg2
i
I
�
I �
� ��
I
i
i _
Mr. Mas pointed out that only the Tentative Parcel Map is
being considered and whether the lot merger is in compliance
with the General Plan. The Director commented that the
Conditional Use Permit is the next item to be considered.
Harry Gibbens, 11327 Louise Avenue, Lynwood, CA., assisted
by Mr. Mas, expressed concern about the impact of the
development on certain items included on the Environmental
Checklist Form included with the Negative Declaration.
The Director explained that the Environment Checklist is
mandatory, according to State law. He said the list applies to
any project in urban or agricultural areas. The checklist
is used to determine environmental impacts.
Air quality:
Mr. Gibbens questioned the impact of therer�aoeedsmells�pfrom
on the quality of the air, e.g.,
trash bins, etc.
The Director responded that trash enclosures are required for
all of these kinds of developments; however, Mr. Mas remarked
that all garbage smells cannot be totally precluded.
Plant life:
Mr. Gibbens inquired whether the proposal would result in change
of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants.
Fence:
Mr. Gibbens said he did not want the block wall installed.
Mr. Mas responded that a block wall is always required in this
type of proposal, in order to create a buffer to separate
developments. Mr. Gibbens was concerned about the fence being
built close to his three trees and the tree roots being cut in
order to build the footings for the block wall.
It was suqgested that some opaque material be used in order to
protect the trees, in lieu of a block wall. Mr. Mas also
suggested that posts and beams be used for the block wa11 rather
than the footings.
The Chairperson asked if Mr. Gibbens was speaking against the
project.
Mr. Gibbens responded that he wants to review the project.
f Mr. Mas mentioned that some of the items on the checklist do not
apply to an urban settinq.
The City Attorney asked the Director to explain to Mr. Gibbens
that "plant life" on the checklist does not refer to the
backyard, but rather to agricultural, rural land, significant
trees, and significant plantlife.
Item 7, with respect to whether there will be an increase in
light and glare, was check "yes." Mr. Mas said this may be a
case where there is no hard evidence that there will be an
i
� Minutes3:Pubhrg
1
�'
F
�" 12 '
i
i
�
impact on the environment. This does not apply to the map,
per se, but to the specific project, the Director said. Mr. Mas
continued by stating that if the project were to be built with
reflective glass, then there would be a problem.
It was suggested that the questions be answered by staff in
at the Planning Division counter.
By the tenor of Mr. Gibbens' questions about the possible
impacts on his property, Mr. Barbosa advised that the Commission
is required to respond to his (Mr. Gibbens') concerns, and that
Mr. Gibbens is entitled to have his concerns addressed in the
public hearing.
Mr. Gibbens expressed concern about the new development
adjacent to his property. Mr. Gibbens_felt that the projects
will significantly impact his life style.
Mr. Mas said Mr. Gibbens questioned the possibility of oil
spills, explosions, etc., in other areas. Mr. Gibbens indicated
he had problems with developments on the south side of his
property and he believes similar problems will occur on the
north side with the subject proposal.
The impact of the development on human health was a concern of
Mr. Gibbens, i.e., botulism and broken glass on the sidewalk.
Increased traffic was another problem Mr. Gibbens wanted
addressed; he said presently cars block his driveway.
Mr. Gibbens inquired whether he would have to remove the
trees on his property, in order for the applicant to install
the block wall.
Mr. Gibbens said his lot is surrounded by two multiple-family
developments and he contends this will funnel the Santa Ana
winds through his property, thereby causing a hazardous
situation; therefore, he requested that the City install a
block wall at the rear of his property.
Mr. Mas explained that the wall on the north and south sides
of Mr. Gibbens' property will be installed by the developers.
Mr. Gibbens is therefore requesting that the City install a
block wall at the rear of his property in order to mitigate
the Venturian effect.
Mr. Gibbens inquired whether a manager would reside on the
premises.
The City Attorney suggested that Mr. Mas provide Mr. Gibbens
with a copy of the Minutes of the meeting so that Mr.
Gibbens will be aware of the testimony in this matter to
determine if the issues he has raised have been satisfied.
� Charles Glenn, 3533_Carlin Avenue, Lynwood, CA., objected to
I the proposal because of the overcrowded schools, even though
developers must pay $1.50 per square foot for residential
� developments, in order to finance construction of necessary
school facilities.
Mr. Glenn maintained that an interpreter should have been
provided for Mr. Gibbens.
�.
i
I Minutes3:Pubhrg2
i.
i
�.
;'. �
� 13
I
i
I
I '
i
The Chairperson reminded Mr. Glenn that staff made every
effort to provide such service for Mr. Gibbens.
' Mr. Glenn further stated there is inadequate access to City Hall
for handicapped persons.
Mr. Kittle was invited to respond to a few of the issues Mr.
Gibbens had cited. Mr. Kittle deferred to the Architect on
. the project.
Jose Carnedo, 7202 Fontana Street, Huntington Beach, CA.,
said it is not possible to protect the trees because 2 to 3
feet of dirt into the soil; however, Mr. Kittle promised to
replace any tree that would be damaged because of
' construction of the wall.
With respect to the funneling of the Santa Ana winds, Mr.
Gibbens discussed, Mr. Carnedo said the two walls will be
approximately 6- 9 feet and his property will be kept clean
because there will be no wind to carry dirt and to his
property because of the walls.
Mr. Carnedo said there would be a resident manager.
In response to Mr. Gibbens concern to maintain a rural area,
Mr. Kittle responded that the property is zoned for high
density residential developments; therefore, multiple family
dwelling units should be anticipated.
Mr. Mas commented that certain issues Mr. Gibbens raised
with respect to parking circulation did not have any bearing
� on the proposed project.
Mr. Carnedo said if Mr. Gibbens would mail a copy of the
issues cited at the public hearing to the applicant,
the concerns would be answered.
The City Attorney suggested that the applicant and architect
take the initiative and prepare a written response to the
issues promulgated at the meeting and deliver this
information to Mr. Gibbens.
The architect answered that he and the applicant would
follow through on the suggestion of Mr. Barbosa.
Mr. Mas requested that a copy of the letter be sent to the
Planning Division so that staff can incorporate in the final
resolution how the developer proposes to solve the issues
raised by Mr. Gibbens. The Director said this would be a
type of agreement between the developer and the city to
ensure that the conditions are met.
f Chairperson Kanka closed the public hearing.
I Commissioner Dennis inquired whether or not the school
district had received notice of the proposed development.
Ms. Tilford answered in the affirmative.
I Minutes3:Pubhrg2
�
I 14 ,
1
�
�
i _-
Motion was made by Commissioner Reid, second by Commissioner
Dove, to adopt Resolution No. 2136, "A RESOLUTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 18893 TO COMBINE LOTS 15 AND SOUTH
TWENTY-FIVE (25) FEET OF LOT 16, IN BLOCK �B' OF TRACT NO.
9641, IN THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 189, PAGE 6 OF
MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY."
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Kanka, Pryor and Reid
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: Commissioners Raymond and Willis
ABSTAIN: NONE
' 8a. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87053
11339-11341 Louise Avenue (Donald Kittle)
Mr. Mas presented the staff report indicating as follows:
This is an application for a Conditional Use Permit to build
fourteen (14) apartment units, with the required parking and
open space, in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone.
The proposal meets all of the development standards required
_ by the Zoning Ordinance with respect to parkinq; front,
side, and rear yard setbacks; distance between structures;
lot coverage; open space and landscaping; building height;
unit size and density.
The applicant has agreed to enter into a ten (10) year
covenant with the City to ensure that the rent for the bonus
units will remain at affordable or fair market rent levels.
On August 27, 1987, the Site P1an Review Committee evaluated
the proposed development and recommended approval by the
Planning Commission, subject to specific conditions.
Chairperson Kanka opened the public hearinq.
Brent Kittle, 20292 Harpoon Circle, Huntington Beach,
California, said he would comply with all conditions
imposed.
�` Harry Gibbens, 11327 Louise Avenue, Lynwood, California,
said he was opposed to security bars on the windows.
Mr. Mas said if security bars are installed, they must
comply with the Uniform Building Code.
There being no further comments, Chairperson Kanka closed
the public hearing.
I (
�
I Minutes3:Pubhrg2
I ,
� 15
;
I
[9otion was made by Commissioner Pryor, second by
Commissioner pove, to adopt Resolution No. 2132, "A
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87053 TO CONSTRUCT
FOURTEEN (14) UNITS IN THE R-3(MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, 11339-11341 LOUISE AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CA.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Kanka, Pryor and Reid
NOES: Commissioner Dennis
ABSENT: Commissioners Raymond and Wi11is
ABSTAIN: NONE
Chairperson Kanka declared a break at 10:00 p.m.
The Planning Commission was called to order at 10:10 p.m.
9. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87064
12502 Harris Avenue (Rafael Zapien)
Ms. Tilford presented the staff report indicating as follows:
This is an application for a Conditional Use Permit to
construct two, two-bedroom existing dwelling
� parking and open space,
unit.
' The applicant proposes to remove the existing accessory
a duplexar aftotalsofg3edwe1lingdunitsnwilldbeu1od
the site.
The proposal meets all of the development standards required
by the Zoning Ordinance with respect to parking; front, side,
and rear yard setbacks; distance between structures; lot
coverage; open space and landscaping; building height; unit
size and density.
This proposed development is Categorically Exempt from the
State CEQA Guidelines, as amended (Section 15303, Class 3).
Chairperson Kanka opened the public hearing.
Neither the applicant nor his representative was present.
Mr. Barbosa advised that the Commission is entitled to
proceed, even in the absence of the applicant, based on the
information that is before it; the staff report evidence�
recommendations of staff constitute primary �
supplemented by any other information the applicant wishes to
I � present. The City Attorney said since the applicarit did
receive notice that he was to attend the meeting, the
Commission may hear the matter based on the evidence that
is presented the staff report or anyone in the audience
who wishes to participate--and decide whether to make a
decision or continue the matter to the next regular meetir.g
of the Planning Commission.
I Minutes3:Pubhrg
I.
� 16 �
�
I _
Siwan Thomas, 4152 Carlin Avenue, Lynwood, CA., said there
are too many apartments on.Carlin Avenue and the . surrounding
area. She mentioned the neighbors have problems with the
children in the apartments on Carlin Avenue.
The public hearing was not closed.
Motion was made by Commissioner Pryor, second by Commissioner
Dove to continue Case No. 87064 to the next regular meeting
of the Planning Commission on October 13, 1987.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dennis, Dove, Kanka, Pryor and
Reid
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: Commissioners Raymond and Wi11is
ABSTAIN: NONE
The City Attorney, mentioned that staff will bring to the
Commission for its consideration procedures for handling cases
when the applicant is not present.
10. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87067
, 11217 Wright Road (Frank Ortiz)
Mr. Mas presented the staff report indicating as follows:
This is an application for a Conditional Use Permit in order
to construct four (4) apartments units, with the required
parking and open space, in the R-3 (Multi-Family
- Residential) zone.
The property is presently occupied by a single family
residence and accessory structures which will be removed
prior to construction of the proposed development.
The proponent proposes to build a two-story, four-unit,
apartment buildinq with the required parking, open space and
' landscaping. The site is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the proposed development relative to density,
bulk of structures, parking, walls and other development
features required by the Zoning Ordinance.
The proposal is consistent with the existing zoning
classification (R-3) and the General Plan designation of
Multi-Family Residential.
Cnairperson Kanka opened the public hearing.
Francisco Ortiz, 3922 E.- Florence Avenue, Bell, CA.,'had
submitted written objections to certain conditions imposed:
I
I�
I Minutes3:Pubhrg2
`. .
I � 17 ,
�
I
�
�
"No. 19 - 8'0" dedication"
"No. 24 - Applicant feels this recommendation is
unfair. As my property is not a corner
lot as the intersection Wright Rd. and
Sanborn... "
"No. 28 - Applicant feels that because an existing
street light being less than 55' - 0"
away (south) of his property, he should
not be required to install a new marbelite
street light . . ." �
Mr. Ortiz said the Department of Public Works had required a
� Certificate of Compliance for the subject site, and the
conditions he is objecting were not mentioned at that time.
Mr. Ortiz suggested that the Public Works Department should
have a hand-out explaining conditions that are required for
for certain developments.
Mr. Devore responded that the irrevocable offer of
dedication does not effect the required setback; the
dedication is for some time in the future. Mr. Devore said
there are no current plans to widen the street; it may take
place in 10 or 20 years.
Mr. Devore continued by stating that the right-of-way is 50'
on Wright Road and because it is a truck route, the easterly
' portion is in the Manufacturing zone and the General Plan
requires a 66' right-of-way; because Mr. Ortiz's
portion is residential, staff is requiring a 5 foot
dedication, as the residential requirement is only 60'.
Therefore, staff is requesting an additional 3' as a
variable to minimize the impact.
The engineer explained that the 3' is within the setback
area; and the setback for the subject property begins at the
property line which is at the 5' dedication.
Mr. Devore said that requiring two wheelchair ramps has been
a policy of the Public�Works Department. He said the
condition is consistent with that policy, i.e.,
to require wheelchair ramps at all intersections within 300
feet of the property being developed. Mr. Devore said the
reason staff requires two wheelchair ramps is a matter of
safety.
Mr. Devore said that Condition No. 24 should read ...
Wright Road and Beechwood Avenue, not Sanborn Avenue.
I Mr. Ortiz contends that all of these conditions should have
been explained to him at the time he applied for a
� Certificate of Compliance for the site.
The City Attorney responded that the applicant has the
I responsibility for educating himself or herself on the
requirements for a particular development. Mr. Barbosa said
` this is not deception on the part of the City, but the
I applicant must investigate and find out what is required
from the City.
I
�'
I Minutes3:Pubhrq2
I
I lg �
i
I
�
�
Mr. Barbosa commented that he would like to research the
City's policy of requiring the wheelchair ramps and
suggested that, if Mr. Ortiz did not object, the matter be
continued to the next regular meeting of the Planning
Commission.
Mr. Ortiz said he had gone to each department inquiring
about the requirements for the proposed development.
The Director interjected that the Certificate of Compliance
to which Mr. Ortiz refers is a separate matter from the
subject proposal. Mr. Mas said the City does not have the
' resources to investigate each case until an application is
filed and fees paid.
With respect to the requirement of a street light, Mr.
' Devore replied that staff does not know whether one is
needed, until site inspection.
Commissioner Pryor asked if the two wheelchair ramps
are standard requirements for all developments.
Mr. Devore said the ramps are required only for new
developments.
Mr. Devore responded that staff requires wheelchair ramps if
there are no ramps,so that access can continue from one side
of the street to the other.
When asked if the ramps are required for business licenses, �
the Engineer answered in the negative.
Commissioner Dennis responded that homeowners should be
given information about the requirements involved, even if
they don't automatically ask for them.
Commissioner pove suggested that pamphlets which contain
certain requirements be made available to the public.
Mr. Ortiz said he thought it was unreasonable to require him
to install a light and when the City is expanded, the light
will be removed.
The applicant said he would not want the matter continued to
the next meeting of the Planning Commission. �
Mr. Devore said staff would work with Mr. Ortiz to resolve
the problems that were addressed.
Motion was made by Commissioner Dennis, second by
Commissioner Pryor, to adopt Resolution No. 2146, "A
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87067 FOR THE
�' CONSTRUCTION OF A FOUR (4) UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING AT 11217
WRIGHT ROAD, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, IN THE R-3 (MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL) ZONE."
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dennis, Dove, Kanka, Pryor and
Reid
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: Commissioners Raymond and Willis
� ABSTAIN: NONE
�'
I
I •:
19 �
i
11. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87071
11186 Carson Drive (William Flores)
Ms. Tilford presented the staff report indicating as follows:
This is an application for a Conditional Use Permit to build
; a duplex, with the required parking and open space, in the
R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone.
The subject property consists of a single lot between Le Sage
Street and Century Boulevard. It is rectangular in shape and
the total area is approximately 6,300 square feet, which is
less than the minimum interior lot size (7,500 sq. ft.) in the
R-3 zone. However, Section 25-4.5 b 17 of the Zoning Ordinance
allows development on substandard-sized lots.
The proposed project is surrounded by multiple and single
family residential developments; therefore, the project will be
compatible with the surrounding area.
The proposal meets all of the development standards required by
the Zoning Ordinance with respect to parking; front, side, and
rear yard setbacks; distance between structures; lot coverage;
open space and landscaping.
The project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the
State CEQA Guidelines, as amended (Section 15303, Class 3).
At its meeting on August 27, 1987, the Site P1an Review
Committee approved the proposed project, subject to the
conditions and requirements stated in the Planning Commission
resolution.
Chairperson Kanka opened the public hearing.
William Flores, 2513 California Street, Huntington Park,
California, said he was aware of the conditions and would
comply with each of them.
There being no further comments from the audience, the public
hearing was closed.
Motion by Commission Dove, second by Commissioner Pryor to
adopt Resolution No. 2147, "A RESOLUTZON OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 87071 TO CONSTRUCT TWO (2) UNITS IN THE R-3 (MULTI-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, 11186 CARSON DRIVE, LYNWOOD,
CALIFORNIA."
The Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Kanka, Pryor, and Reid
NOES: Commissioner Dennis
ABSENT: Commissioners Raymond and Willis
ABSTAIN: NONE
I
�
f
I
i
�, Minutes3:PUbhrg2
i
%
r
i
� 20
i
1 '
i
(
�
12. Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Case No. 87075 •
Mr. Mas presented the staff report indicating as follows:
" This is a proposed amendment to Chapter 25, '.the Official
' Zoning Ordinance, with respect to the minimum distance
between principal buildings and accessory buildings and also
between accessory buildings.
At present the minimum distance between the principal building
and the accessory building is five (5') feet in all residential
zones. However, with the five-foot distance, a one-hour fire
wa11 must be provided, pursuant to the Uniform Building Code.
If the distance is.changed to six (6') feet, no fire wa11 wi11
be required.
If adopted, the ordinance will be in conformance with the UBC.
Chairperson Kanka opened the public hearing.
There being no response from the audience, the public hearing
was closed.
Mr. Barbosa asked if the ordinance would require a six foot
separation between primary and accessory structures.
Mr. Mas responded in the affirmative and said the six foot
separation is also between accessory structures, as we11.
The Director commented that installing a one-hour fire wall
creates a hardship to some property owners.
Commissioner pove asked if the five foot setback would still
be in force, if the ordinance is adopted.
Mr. Mas answered that it would not.
Motion was made by Commissioner Pryor, second by Commissioner
Reid, to adopt Resolution No. 2149, "A RESOLUTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD RECOMMENDING CITY
COUNCIL ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 25, THE OFFICIAL
ZONING ORDINANCE, OF THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE, WITH RESPECT
TO THE MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN ACCESSORY STRUCTURES AND
MAIN STRUCTURES AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES AND OTHER ACCESSORY
STRUCTURES IN THE RESIDENTIAL ZONES."
The Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dennis, Dove, Kanka, Pryor and
Reid
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: Commissioners Raymond and Willis
ABSTAIN: NONE
I Minutes3:Pubhrg2
�
�
(
�
I 21
�
�
�
�
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS:
Mr. Mas explained that On July 14, 1987, the Planning Commission
directed staff to schedule a special study session to evaluate the
present trend of development activity in the R-2 and R-3 zones, and
the resulting perceived impact in traffic and parking congestion,
overtaxing of utilities and school overcrowding.
Staff recommended that the Planning Commission schedule the study
session for Tuesday, September 29, 1987, at 7:30 p.m., in the
City Hall Council Chambers.
Staff further recommended that the Planning Commission provide
further direction on the specific areas of concern to be
addressed at the study session and the format to be followed.
It was unanimously agreed that the study session would be held as
requested by staff.
STAFF COMMENTS
Participation in UCLA Extension Course -- Practical Approaches to
Preparing and Revising a General Plan.
The Director announced that the UCLA Extension Program is conducting
a planning course focusing on the technical approaches to tne
preparation or revision of the General Plan. In view of the
impending revision/update of the Lynwood General Plan, the Planning
Commissioners were encouraged to participate in the course. Those
Commissioners wishinq to attend the course should contact Dorethea
Tilford, Acting Senior Planner, on or before Thursday, September 10,
1987, at (213) 603-0220, Extension 288 for the necessary
arrangements.
Alcoholic Bevera4e Ordinance
Mr. Barbosa said he asked that the City Council bring the ordinance
back for re-consideration; the thirty (30) days are now running.
The City Attorney said he had some concerns about certain provisioils
in the ordinance that might cause legal problems fcr the City. Mr.
Barbosa said he is planning to come back to the Planning Commission
and the Council with some modifications to the ordinance. He said
he hopes to make the ordinance less subject to challenge.
Mr. Barbosa continued by stating that the City of Los Angeles has a
provision that no single bottle can be purchased. However, he said
Los Angeles provides a case by case analysis of each application.
The attorney said the 500 ft. distance from other liquor
establishments might be a problem.
COMMISSION ORALS:
, Commissioner pove reiterated his former suggestion that brochures or
pamphlets explaining the various procedures be available at the
department counters.
PUBLIC ORALS:
There were none.
I
22
I .
�
,I
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business to come before the Commission, the
meeting was adjourned at 12:02 a.m., to the next regular meeting of
the Planning Commission on October 13, 1987, at 7:30 p.m., in the
City Hall Council Chambers, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California.
APPROVED AS WRIITTEN this 13th day of October, 1987.
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Vicente L. Mas, Secretary
II I
I
�
�
I
i
I
I
I
I .
( Minutes3:Pubhrg2
I 23 '
�
I __