The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About06-11-96 PLANNING COMMISSION . ;r ; . , c� AGENDA LYNWOOD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - 7:30 P.M. � n�� r� QI�tJ (f' City Hall Council Chambers F2 C�EIV E D I 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, CA CITY OFLYNWOOD , CITY CLERKS OF�ICE � 1 � June 1 �; 1996 .; � G 990 � AM Pil 7i8i9i10i11i�1i1 �2�3i4i5i 6 Carlton McMiller �(,�� " (�/�� Chairperson �� U Errick Lee Donald Dove i Vice Chairman ' Commissioner I I Eloise Evans Richard Kuan ( Commissioner Commissioner . � ' Jamal Muhsin Jamina Barnes � Commissioner Commissioner i C O M M I�•S S I 0 N C O'U N S E L• I Michele Beal Bagneris Deputy City'Attorney _ STAFF: I Gary Chicots, Director Robert Diplock ' Community Development Department Planning Manager � i Louise E. Morales, Jr. Art Barfield ° ; Associate Planner Associate Planner i Paul Nguyen � Civil Engineer Assoc. _ i � � � • - - i i � �i . � f:\wpfiles\misc\june96 1 . . ,' I — I . a, June 11, 1996 OPENING CEREMONIES � l. Call meeting to order. 2. Flag salute,. 3. Roll ca11 of Commissioners. 4. Certification of Agenda Posting. 5. Approval of May 14, 1996 commission minutes. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: l. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE N0. CUP 96-02 Applicant: Rev. John R. Henderson Christ New Testament Baptist Church PROPOSAL ` , The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit in order to replace an existing school and day care ', center with a three (3) story private school, which wi11 be attached to an existing church, offering grades kindergarten through eight grade at 11820 So. Atlantic Averiue in the CB-1 (Controlled Business) zone, This case was continued from the ' May 14, 1996 Commission meeting in order to allow the applicant to address required parking under the City-Zoning ' Ordinance. The applicant has revised his original proposal to - reduc.e the number of classrooms. . RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2582: l. Certifying that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Negative Declaration ` has been issued pursuant to the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines. 2. Approving Conditional Use Case No. CUP 96-02 subject to the stated conditions and requirements. NEW PUBLIC HEARING , None REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS 2. REOUEST: Request for Exemption From Fence Ordinance Requirements For House at 4957 Abbott Road (R-1 Residential Zone). ' RECOMMENDATION: - Staff respectfully requests that, after review, the Commission � reject this request. 2 • ". w, 3. SUBJECT: . Draft Of Letter To Council Re: Approval of Auto Repair ' Facility At 3800 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. RECOMMENDATION - . Review and discuss issue and direct staff to take whatever action is determined by the Commission. 4. Draft letter to Traffic and Parking Commission re: Test of speed humps on Magnolia Avenue Eetween Long Beach Boulevard ' and Bullis Road. RECOMMENDATION Review ' draft and direct staff to make any desired ' modifications. . STAFF ITEMS 5. Staff report from Public Works Department Council Re:-Proposed , Test of Speed Humps. 6. Population and Housing Estimates For 1996 7. Amended Resolutions (if available) PUBLIC ORALS COMMISSION ORALS STAFF ORALS ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on July ' 09, 1996 at 7:30 p.m., in the City Ha11 Council Chambers, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California. f:\wpfiles\misc\june96 � � � i 3 �� . � �: LYNWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION, MAY 14, 1996 , The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood met in a Regular Session in the City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, on the above date at 7:30 p.m. Vice-Chairman Lee presiding. Commissioners Dove, Evans, Kuan, Muhsin and Lee answered the roll call. Commissioners Barnes and McMiller were absent. Also present were Planning Manager Diplock, City Attorney Rudell; Associate Planner Morales and Civil Engineer Associate Nguyen. Planning Manager Diplock announced the Agenda had been duly posted in accordance with The Brown Act. It was moved by Commissioner Muhsin, seconded by Commissioner Evans and carried to approve the minutes of April 9, 1996 as corrected. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS Vice-Chairman Lee introduced the first item, Conditional Use Permit, Case No. CUP 96-02. Applicant: Rev. John R. Henderson; I Christ New Testament Baptist Church, and called for a staff report. � � Planning Manager Diplock stated sta£f had received a letter from � the applicant requesting a continuance to the next regularly � scheduled meeting in order to present plans for redesigned � classroom space and to resolve parking issues. i It was moved by Commissioner Evans, seconded by Commissioner � Muhsin to continue the item. j i ROLL CALL: i AYES: COMMISSIONER DOVE, EVANS, M[RiSIN, RUAN, LEE NOES: NONE ABSENT: CONII�SISSIONER BARNES McMILLER ; NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS i Vice-Chairman Lee then introduced the next item, Conditional Use Permit Case No. CUP 95-06R. Applicant: Feliciano Ramos, and I called for a staff report. Planning Manager Diplock stated that the Commission previously I approved a request for on-site beer and wine for this location on ! Ma 9, 1995. The action was a � Y ppealed and the City Council denied the request for a Conditional Use Permit. Part of the Council's , concern was the lack of control on the size and type of I restaurant that could be granted an on-site beer and wine permit. I Since that time, the Council has adopted a minimum size for I restaurants serving beer and wine. The applicant now meets those � minimum standards. At this time, staff respectfully request's that the Commission, after consideration, approve the item. ' i Vice-Chairman Lee opened the Public Hearing. j I Manuel L. Dias 4160 Walnut Ave. spoke in favor of the Conditional ! Use.Permit. i Sonia Ramos 11216 Virginia, spoke in favor of the Conditional Use � Permit. , j Feliciano Ramos/Applicant and Owner of the Business spoke in i favor of the Conditional Use Permit. � ! After discussion with regard to serving limitation requirements, I Chairman Lee closed the Public Hearing. � ; I � i ' � i� � ^ It was then moved by Commissioner Evans, seconded by Commissioner Dove to adopt: - RESOLUTION NO. 2587 ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-06R (CUP 95-06R) ALLOWING THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN A RESTAURANT AT 11098 S. ATLANTIC AVENUE, IN THE C-3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA". with amendments to the Conditions of Approval for a three (3) drink maximum. ROLL CALL: AYES: COMMISSIONER DOVE, EVANS, MUHSIN, KUAN NOES: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSZONER BARNES, McMILLER ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONER LEE Vice-Chairman Lee introduced the next item, Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 96-05. Applicant: Sal Preciado, and called for a staff report. Planning Manager Diplock stated the applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to sell beer and wine for on-site consumption in an existing restaurant at 3840 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, in the C-2 (Light commercial ) zone. The applicant is currently not operating in compliance with City Ordinance requirements relating to large scale assembly. Staff believes that issuing a CUP to serve beer and wine in this restaurant will only aggravate the problem and increase the negative impacts on the neighbors. At this time, staff requests that the Commission, after consideration, continue this hearing to the next regularly scheduled meeting and direct staff to work with the applicant to bring the operation of this facility into compliance with all ordinances and regulations. ' Vice-Chairman Lee then opened the Public Hearing. Adolph Lopez 11431 Plum St., spoke in favor of the Conditional I Use Permit. i Sal Preciado/Applicant 3840 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.; � requested the Commission consider approval of his Conditional Use � Permit and discussed the business which is currently operating on � the site, and recent events that have taken place at the � restaurant. i � Sal Landeros 5211 Cortland, spoke in favor of the Conditional Use Permit. � i Tom Skendall 11324 Ernestine, spoke in favor of the Conditional Use Permit. Hearing no further discussion, Vice-Chairman Lee closed the � Public Hearing. � Commissioner Kuan recommended approval of the CUP with the � i elimination of the lounge area, limiting the beer and wine permit ; to the restaurant area only. i i The Commissioned discussed their desire to add as a Condition of , Approval, the sale of beer & wine with meals only. City Attorney Rudell stated pursuant to Ordinance 1141, the word � meal is defined as the usual assortment of foods, commonly i ordered at various hours of the day; however, a menu offering ; food and victuals such as sandwiches, snacks, and/or salads onlv; shall not be deemed as being in compliance with this requirement. � Vice-Chairman Lee requested incorporating this language into � Condition #21. City Attorney Rudell recommended the following wording as an ; amendment to the Conditions, "...beer & wine shall be sold only � with meals, and shall be consumed only in the restaurant/lounge I i I � �_ , � ; ., area..." It was then moved by Commissioner pove, seconded by Commissioner Muhsin to adopt Resolution #z588 with an additional amendment restricting large truck/tractor parking. ; ROLL CALL• AYES: COMMISSIONER DOVE, MLTHSIN � NOES: COMMISSIONER EVANS, KUAN, LEE ABSENT: CO2+AtISSIONER BARNES, MeMILLER i Motion denied. It was then moved by Commissioner Evans, seconded by Commissioner Kuan to adopt: � RESOLUTION NO. 2588 ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96-05 (CUP 96-OS) ALLOWING THE SALE OF BEER AND WINE IN A RESTAURANT AT 3840 MARTIN LUTHER ICING JR. BOULEVARD IN THE C-2 (LIGHT COMMERCIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA". with amendments to item #21, within the Conditions of Approval, I relating to designated areas for sale and consumption. ROLL CALL: � � AYES: COMMISSIONER EVANS, MUHSIN, ICUAN NOES: COMMISSIONER DOVE � ABSENT: CONII+IISSIONER BARNES, McMILLER � i ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONER LEE Motion carried. i a I The Commission took a brief recess at 9:13 p.m. � ' Commission reconvened at 9:20 p.m. ; I Vice-Chairman Lee introduced the next item, Conditional Use I Permit, Case No. 96-06. Applicant: Young Lee and called for a � staff report. i Planning Manager Diplock stated the applicant is requestin�g I approval of a Conditional Use Permit to sell alcoholic beverages I for off-site consumption. The applicant proposes to relocate an I existing off-site alcoholic beverage sales facility and retail market into an existing building at 12211 Long Beach Blvd. 'A i market is located in the same building. At this time, staf.f � respectfully requests that the Commission after consideration, ; approve the item. , Vice-Chairman Lee then opened the Public Hearing. i ' I Frankie Calloway 5232 Carlin Ave., spoke in support of Conditional Use Permit 96-06 ; i Commissioner Evans excused herself from discussion pertaining to � ' this item, because of a potential conflict of interest. ; Helen Mendoza/Helen's Liquor 12512 Atlantic Ave, spoke in suppor•t � of Conditional Use Permit 96-06. � Young Lee/Business Owner 12301 Long Beach Blvd., requested the � Commission consider approval of his Conditional Use Permit, after I reconsidering Condition of Approval #9, which limits the hours of � sales c/o 1:00 a.m. Also discussed with the Commission the I comparisons between the existing site and the proposed site. ' � Elizabeth Morales 3320 Magnolia Ave., spoke in opposition t;o � Conditional Use Permit 96-06. Feels this area currently has a ; high crime rate, and relocating the store would create additional � problems. � I Pastor Daniel Lopez 3320 Magnolia Ave. spoke in opposition to � Conditional Use Permit 96-06. � Eloise Evans, Block Watch Captain for Magnolia Ave., spoke in � opposition to Conditional Use Permit 96-06. � ' I i � . ; _:; -� , Helen Mendoza spoke in support of Mr. Lee and his market. Hearing no further discussion, Vice-Chairman closed the Public Hearing. _. It was then moved by Commissioner Muhsin, seconded by� Commissioner Lee to adopt: , RESOLUTION NO. 2589 ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 96=06 (CUP 96-06) ALLOWING THE SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AT 12211 LONG BEACH BOULEVARD, IN THE C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA". with the elimination of Condition #8, relating to motor fuels,� amendments to Condition 9, amending the houra of sales, and adding a condition requiring installation of adequate lighting. ROLL CALL• � AYES: COMMISSIONER MLRiS2N, RUAN, LEE NOES: NONE . ABSENT: COMMISSIONER BARNES, McM2LLER ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONER DOVE, EVANS Motion carried. ' Vice-Chairman Lee introduced the next item, Variance Case No. VAR 96-03. Applicant: Ho Seok Lyn/Young Ok Lyn, and called for a staff report. Associate Planner Morales stated the applicant is requesting a variance to reduce the required parking in order to maintain a commercial/retail property at 11057-67 So. Atlantic Ave. in the � C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone. The property is currently developed with a one story commercial building. The building contains � eight (8) store front retail spaces, one of which is vacant. the i applicant wishes to expand an existing meat market and relocate an existing video store into the vacant store space within the � development. At this time, staff respectfully requests that I after consideration the Commission approve the variance. i i Vice-Chairman Lee discussed current condition of the site and I suggested additional conditions with regard to trash in the I parking area and unsanitary conditions in the meat market to be incorporated into the Conditions of Approval. ? i Jose Ramirez/(Current tenant at the proposed site) 11037 Duncan ; Ave., spoke in favor of Variance 96-03 and discussed current I problems that the tenants are having with the trash hauler. ; I Howard, 145 Warren, Placentia spoke in favor of variance VAR 96- ; 03, and discussed the Conditions of Approval. ' Hearing no further discussion, Vice-Chairman Lee closed the Public Hearing. i �i It was then moved by Commissioner pove, seconded by Commissioner ' Muhsin to adopt: i RESOLUTION NO. 2590 ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING + COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A VARIANCE (CASE VAR N0. 96-03) TO REDUCE REQUIRED PARKING FROM THIRTY NINE (39) I SPACES TO NINETEEN (19) SPACES IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN AN EXISTING � COMMERCIAL BUILDING IN THE C-3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL) ZONE, AT j 11053-67 S. ATLANTIC AVENUE, LYNWOOD CALIFORNIA". j and to include conditions which would provide for a trash ' enclosures, health inspection clearance and determination on the ; required number of trash enclosures. � � ROLL CALL• ! I AYES: COMMISSIONER DOVE, EVANS, MLTHSIN, RUAN LEE NOES: NONE , j ABSENT: COMMISSIONER BARNES, McMILLER Motion carried. REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS � Vice Chairman Lee introduced the next item, Tentative Map Case ' � j No. TM 95-06R. Applicant: Wilbur Owens, and called for a staff, � report. �. : �r Planning Manager Diplock stated the applicant is requesting modification of two Conditions of Approval for Tentative Map No. 52143, previously approved by the Planning Commission. At this time, staff respectfully requests, that, after consideration, the Commiss'ion determine that the proposed modifications to. Conditions of Approval are minor revisions and modifications and do not require an additional public hearing and approve the' applicant's request. It was then moved by Commissioner Muhsin, seconded by Commissioner Evans to adopt: � RESOLUTION NO. 2592 ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING TRACT MAP N0. 52143� TO SUBDIVIDE ONE (1) PARCEL INTO SIX (6) LOTS. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 170F BELLE-VERNON ACRES RECORDED IN BOOK� 6186-002 OF MAPS IN RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES". ROLL CALL• AYES: COMMISSIONER DOVE, EVANS, MUHSIN, KUAN, LEE NOES: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONER BARNES, McMILLER , STAFF ITEMS , Planning Manager Diplock submitted reports with regard to events leading up to the approval of the automotive facility at Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. & Bullis Road, and an update on the' nuisance property on Louise Ave. I Vice-Chairman Lee discussed concerns, violations and code I enforcement action with the automotive repair facility on Martin ; Luther King Jr. Blvd. Also discussed previous action by the � Commission to place the item on the Commission Agenda for action. ( It was moved by Commissioner Lee, seconded by Commissioner Evans j to place, on the Agenda, for the next regular scheduled meeting, i the automotive repair station and its violations, and any other legal non-compliance of the operation located at the corner of I Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd & Bullis Road, that a letter ; addressed to the City Council be prepared for review by the I Commission the letter to request review of that approval and to � express concerns of the Commission. Also, that Code Enforcement � be directed to identify any and all violations as relates to the City Code and that a report of all actions that were taken be ' forwarded to the City Council. i ROLL CALL• I AYES: COMMISSIONER EVANS, MUHSIN, KUAN, LEE I NOES: COMMISSIONER DOVE � ABSENT: COMMISSIONER BARNES, McMILLER , j COMMISSION ORALS � Commissioner Muhsin discussed concerns with graffiti on the �� electrical poles along Atlantic Ave. ; � Hearing no further discussion, Commission adjourned to the next , regular scheduled meeting at 11:30 p.m. i i , � VICE CHAIRMAN ERRICK LEE ' ' i APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: i ' � i I ROBERT DIPLOCK, MICHELE BEAL BAGNERIS, i PLANNING MANAGER DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY � j � , I 1 � � a (., r r �,� r�i�. 1 ._' �- i f ��' � rl.�._s�ti:. f, i i C it't 111f. ,,;, DATE: June 11, 1996 /� " <,. �'' (1 :: .:" i1I �� O � . TO: PLANNING COMMISSION `�"•-'- i4.;. �� FROM: Gary Chicots, Director J/i Community Development Department�'�= ' SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 96-02 Applicant: Rev. John R. Henderson Pr000sal: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit in order to replace an existing school and day care center with a three (3) story private school, which will be attached to an existing church, offering grades kindergarten through eighth grade at 11820 S. Atlantic Avenue in the CB-1 (Controlled Business) zone. This case was continued from the May 14, 1996 Commission meeting in order to allow the applicant to address required parking under the City Zoning Ordinance. The applicant has revised his original proposal to reduce the number of classrooms. Facts: 1. Proiect Characteristice: The applicant has revised his original proposal to reduce the number of classrooms from 22 to 7 by combining small classrooms into larger or combined classrooms, and by . changing 6 classrooms on the third floor into a library, and changing one large classroom on the first floor into a dining room. The overall proposal still remains the same i.e. a 4,790 sq. ft., three (3) story building attached to an existing church. However, the total number of employees now stands at 15 instead of 72. Thirty-six (36) parking spaces serves both the church and the proposed school. The hours of operation remains the same, Mondays through Fridays, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Saturdays occasionally, and two hours on Sundays. 2. Source of Authoritv Section 25-7.1 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtain for any use not specifically permitted in the CB-1 (Controlled Business) zone. 3. Propertv Location ' • The site is located on the east side of S. Atlantic Boulevard between Josephine and Lavinia streets. (Please see attached location map.) 4. Property Size The subject site consists of a lot which is rectangularly ' shaped and approximately 25,200 square feet in size. 5. Existina Land Use The property is,currently occupied by a church and an attached one story day care facility. The surrounding land uses are as follows: , North - Commercial South - Commercial . East - Single-Family Residential West - Commercial - � h:cup9602J ' 1 . �. 6. Land Use Description • The G'eneral Plan Designation for the subject property is Commercial while the Zoning Classification is CB-1. The surrounding land use designations are as follows: General Plan: Zonina: North - Commercial North - CB-1 South - Commercial South - CB-1 East - Single Family Residential East - R-3 West - Commercial West - CB-1 7. Site Plan Review _. On March 4, 1996, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the original development proposal and determined that it did . not provide the required parking. The Committee also was concerned about the lack of outside play area. The Committee suggested that the applicant revise his proposal in order to resolve these issues. On May 22, 1996, Staff received copies of the revised proposal for review and for presentation to the Commission. 8. Zonin4 Enforcement Historv None of record at the time this report was completed. 9.. Public Response None of record at the time this report was prepared. ANALYSIS.AND CONCLUSION: l. Consistencv with General Plan The proposed use will upgrade an existing school facility and is consistent with land use goals and guidelines of the City General Plan. • The proposal does meet the General Plan Circulation Element requirements that "All development projects...shall be required to provide adequate on-site parking...and Circulation Policy No. 7"...enforce parking requirements for new development to insure sufficient parking...." The City Zoning Ordinance requires 35 parking spaces for the project and the proposal provides 36. Granting Conditional Use Permit No. 96-02 will not adversely affect the General Plan provided required parking is met by the proposal development. 2. Site Suitabilitv The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development relative to structures, walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features " required by the Zoning Ordinance. However, the property is not large enough to provide separate outdoor play facilities. 3. Compatibilitv The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of commercial and residential developments. With the reduced _ number of classrooms and the reduced parking demand, there should be no significant impacts on surrounding uses. Therefore, the project will be compatible with the surrounding land uses. - ' 2 • 4. Compliance with Development Standards ,� The proposal meets the development standards required by the Zoning Ordinance with respect to setbacks, lot coverage and building,height. The project meets the parking requirements of the Code. The Zoning Ordinance ca11s for five (5) spaces per class room in a private school. The proposal calls for seven (7) classrooms. Therefore, 35 parking spaces are . required for the project and 36 spaces have been provided. 5. Conditions of Approval The improvements. as proposed, subject to the conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, or welfare. 6. Benefits to Communitv The proposal will provide a community service and potentially help to reduce classroom size in public schools. 7. Environmental Assessment The Community Development Department Staff has determined that no substantial environmental impact will result from the ' proposed project, pursuant the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared and is on file in the Community Development Department and the office of the City Clerk. � RECOMMENDATION: _. Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2582: 1. Certifying that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Negative Declaration has been issued pursuant to the provisions of California Environmental Quality Act and CEQA Guidelines. 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit Case No. 96-02 subject to the stated Conditions and Requirements. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Floor Plans/Rendering of Proposal Project 3. Resolution No. 2582 f:\statf�pt\cup9602J 3 _. --.�. _......._....._ - � . -- �„�,� .__---- ,,, , ...,.... . . LOC�4�°fON MAP - . N � � J� �'�''�:��1� „w�, __ -- . �R : � � �.f • A [�� ` . h � � . ! - I _� � ` N Q f • - • � n •' , • I .. . A.u.�. inla3 �MM� � I��p�� S,�°� � @ . .+e .•s ,� ` �BHT �. � sNTR° �, � e �. � � t � ��' I ' � _ � ".t%�r c.i" , �,...-. i i �o � J�t:�•.a� .. ^ zl "" o co � � AY E - Nl�E - Si. P - .r �,� � s �._ � �, p ERN >' . M�OOD � j � ' : �"' t Ineo � ! y I � �' � Z 705'' 21 Jf� K':1�nwi ��rro r� . . i � i �, ' � 2 / �JIL- . . uwe ti • 1 . _ _ .� � � i 7 n , /� ' ^ d s ii � i' 1 K _ �n�� • J!. w, 1 �' l / . • � • W �r. 1 i! �n � i � � N33$ ��p �'�� Q '� •�f ♦ r � h , rr � , r - 1...... •( N // lll.♦ � I. I. h � //p�'�, /O • �t �.,, „.�� - - JOSEPHINE �� STRE£T � � IIMs� � ne� �.. � � ' aee> w � �' � . ' 1/t'6 �• `� i i8es � , ' • W i"°° 7 , �''iao ' � . - - . _ � a q �2 � Z � . _ . � n!a a � //IO7 „ z�i � I�e�a'W M� . . . - Nr ` � � • � Hg�� „6n . Q , hw � , — /i8i3 y //P/�/ � �r� 9 -� � _• w neit : /i � • � � i� r ni� . �n � n.;�' , "-,> � ' - ii �i � /i � � — ��r -+ 1� — //l�t� g.l s . �N73�v : ae�s' , 4e�a «�.0 . o � : ' � + , M J ' �R�� f�. rN1i�. . � , y • : : _ f� u _ ' .. � � � , �1' , , �" MIy' ' A�•t �. . s � 1,�,� •. � . �ENUe _ °' � �f�. • , ��,� � � �� . w iles�• ..�,eu w , i� . 8 .. r1° ,. �. � , ie a , .' ntaa .. , :�eR � �� * .. h `� : ;i ` � S •,• • � � inw a��ra :. ^ c �, • . ;: • „ • ,, . � ;, ,� in i ,; ��o�� .' � � ,� �.:.'� S 0 i� � zo Jp rw� e ...... . . s>::; � I� • � LAVINIA . , IL S/ � w x i �t. a � , rb� ,• S �p��7 „ i r � r � .�aw :, A n �� .� � j� � s. s7 ?T .�� , i s a_ ' I /Lta b � h a�� • ' s .. { a `4� A � CASE N0. � _ _ �U�° �F--m , : � �; . .� RESOLUTZON NO. 2582 � A RESOLUTION_OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE " PERMIT NO. 96-02 TO DEVELOP AND OPERATE A THREE (3) STORY PRIVATE SCHOOL AT 11820 S. ATLANTIC AVENUE IN THE CB-1 (CONTROLLED BUSINESS) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission pursuant to law, on March 12, 1996 and May 14, 1996 conducted a public hearing on. the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered a11 pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that no substantial environmental impact will result from the proposed development. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been filed in the Community Development Department and in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for any development not expressly permitted, in the GB-1 (Controlled Business) zone. • Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as follows: � A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the structures, walls, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Official Zoning Ordinance. B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety, or welfare. __ C. The site wi11 be developed pursuant to the current — zoning regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the Site Plan Review Committee. D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 96-02, provided the following conditions are observed and complied with at all times: -- ' . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT l. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable . regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building Code and the Fire Code and be in substantial _. compliance with plans on file with the Community Development_ Department. 2. Comply with all applicable codes of the State of California Education Code for' private schools prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy from the City of Lynwood. 3. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or ' structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, for review of said modifications. 1 . •: 4. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. 5. The applica-nt and/or his representative shall sign a • Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance of any building permits. a. Instruction shall be offered "in the several branches of study required to be' taught in public schools..." b. Instruction shall be in English. c. All.instructors must be capable of teaching and must meet standards comparable to those required for public school teachers in similar positions. d. Keep attendance in a register for each day that school is maintained and report attendance annually to the State Department of Education. e. Provide a full time day school. - f. Meet all applicable earthquake safety standard requirements. __ g. For private schools with 50 or more students or containing more than one classrooms provide an operative _ fire warning system. h. Provide industrial quality eye protective devices for individuals in courses engaged in observing an activity using a hazardous substance likely to cause eye injury. 6. All State of California requirements for private schools must be complied with. PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS 7.. Limit school operations to Mondays through Fridays, 8:00 a..m. to 5:00 p.m. The facility may be used Saturdays or Sundays for Church school related activities. , 8. Mitigate any adverse effect on the neighborhood due to pedestrian or vehicular traffic, such as staggering children's drop-offs, maintaining driveways unobstructed, and turning off idling engines of vehicles. 9. Advertising or signs shall not be displayed on the premises until reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. 10. All construction shall be performed by a licensed contractor as per plans, specifications and current codes. 11. The applicant sha11 contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving . the proposed development. 12. Construction shall commence within (6) months from date of issuance of building permits. 13. Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25°s) , percent of the lot area. 14. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. ' �.. h:\resalutn\reso2582 ' 2 � ' The minimum,plant material shall be trees and shrubs combined with ground cover as follows: One (1) five (5) gallon shrub for each 100 square feet of landscaped.area; and two (2) fifteen gallon trees for each 500 square feet of landscaped areas. 15. A minimum 36 parking spaces sha11 be provided on the subject site. 16. Final building elevations, including materials of construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the , Building Official and the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. 17. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved. 18. Acoustical construction materials shall be used throughout the building to mitigate roadway,noise to the staridards and satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. 19. The structure shall have an exterior siding of brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar material other than the reflective glossy, polished and/or rolled- - formed type metal siding. 20. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of any exterior elevation changes to the building must be approved by the Director of Community Development or his/her designee. 21. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in a consistent manner, including the incorporation within the side and rear building elevations of some or all of the , � design elements used for the primary (front) facades. 22. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent � building. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc. shall be installed without the prior written approval of the Director of Community Development. 23. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment, and all other mechanical devices shall be located within the ' rear yard or side yards. Such equipment shall be screened from surrounding properties and streets and operated so that they do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring residents, in accordance with the City's Noise � Ordinance. � 24. A cover sheet of approved conditions must be attached to plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety ' Division. � 25. The owner of the site shall maintain a pro-active approach � � fo'the elimination of graffiti from the structures, fences and accessory buildings, on a daily basis. - � 26. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one ' hundred and twenty (120) days after the use permitted has been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised. , PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT , 27. A parcel map or Lot Merger is required to combine the lots together. Building permits will not be issued prior to the recordation of a subdivision map or lot merger. 28. Dedicate a ten (10) wide strip of property along. Atlantic Avenue. 3 i � — .. � 29. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered Civil Engineer. Property is located within the 100 Year flood level zone per flood boundary map. Also conform to all applicable codes per section 12 1/2 of the Lynwood Municipal Code. Building above the flood level will require substantial amount of fill, therefore, suggest alternative methods of design to minimize amount of usable space at ground level. 30. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter, drive approach (es) and required pavement along Atlantic Avenue. 31. Close the existing drive approach that is not in use and construct parkway along Atlantic Avenue. 32. Connect to public sewer. Construct laterals as necessary. 33. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass. 34. Underground all utilities. . 35. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all off-site improvements. _ 36. All required water meters,'meter service changes and/or fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The�- . work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the developer. The contractor must obtain a,permit from the Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any work. FIRE DEPARTMENT 37. FIRE�ALARMS -- Approved fire alarms shall be provided for all Group E Occupancies with an occupant load of more than 50 persons. In every Group E Occupancy provided with an automatic sprinkler or detection system, the operation •of such system shall automatically activate the school fire alarm system which shall include an alarm mounted on the exterior of the building (UBC 809, UFC 14.104(b)3A). 38. SPECIAL PROVISIONS -- Rooms in Divisions 1 and 2 Occupancies used for kindergarten, first and second grade pupils and Division 3 Occupancies shall not be located above the first , story. EXCEPTION: In buildings equipped with an automatic sprinkler system throughout, rooms used for kindergarten, � first or second grade children or for day care purposes may be located on the second story, provided'there are at least two exits directly to the exterior for the exclusive use of such occupants. (UBC 802(c)). 39. EXIT SIGNS -- Not required at main entrance. Illuminated exist signs shall be required. Internally or externally illuminated exist signs shall be required. Internally or externally illuminated by two electric lamps or shall be of an approved self-luminous type. (UFC 12.108(a,b)). � 40. PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS -- 2A extinguishers within 75 - feet. (UFC 10.303(a)). 4,1. FIXED FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT -- Automatic fire extinguishing system over all cooking equipment plus a � portable fire extinguishers with a minimum 40RC rating. (UFC 10.313). Extinguishing.system to be serviced every six mounts or after activation of the system. (UFC 10.313(e). h:\resolutn\reso2582 _ . 4 � 1 1 �Y � 42.' GATES AND FIRE DRILLS -- School grounds may be fenced and . • gates therein equipped with locks, provided safe dispersal areas are located not less than 50 feet from the buildings. Dispersal areas shall be sized to provide an area of not less than 3 square feet per occupant. Gates shall not be installed across corridors or passageways leading to such dispersal area, unless they comply with exist requirements (UBC 3319(k). 43. FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM -- Provide an approved fire sprinkler system. Submit plans for approval prior to installation. FC 1201(d) and T.24-2-3802 Section 3. A__copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1996, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Carlton McMiller, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: � Gary C. Chicots, Director ` Michele Beal Bagneris � Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney f\resoluin\resa2582 � _ . � 5 ! � , !<e � �' . . , i r p,yl `i.1' i .e `'��11 j 5 v. � , � �... -�." i�!(1 DATE: June 11, 1996 �""'" '��• T0: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Gary Chicots, Director �,� Community Development Department�'t(i' SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM FENCE ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR HOUSE AT 4957 ABBOTT (R-1 RESIDENTIAL ZONE) , REOUEST: Ms. Ana Brambila is requesting permission to eonstruct a fence (4 ft. high) iri the fr-ont yard at 4957 Abbott Road. Backaround• - The property owner at 4957 Abbott Road is requesting a variance or exemption from recent Zoning Ordinance regulations prohibiting fences .in the front yards of R-1 zoned property (see attached letter). Reasons cited are "to keep off trespassers", for safety _ and to keep three year old daughter from running out into the street. The applicant's property is located on the north side of Abbott, second house from the corner. 'The houses on either side have front yard fences - one block and wrought iron and the other is chain link, both about 4 feet high. None of the three other lots on the block have fences. F Discussion: The Zoning Ordinance states that no fences are permitted in the front 20 £t. setback in the R-1 residential zone except for corner . lots where significant trespass can be demonstrated or in other . situations involving significant trespass. The Ordinance language is: "Upon application to the Director of Community Development, a ' fence, not to exceed 3 ft. if solid and 4 feet if wrought iron, may be approved in the front yard setback area for the corner portion of a corner lot adjacent to a major arterial street or in other � situations where it can be demonstrated that a fence is necessary to prevent significant trespass." Staff's site 'inspection during the last week of May and at 5:45 p.m. on June OS and 12:05 p.m, on June 06 showed no trespass at that time. Staff believes that, in her statement, the applicant has not demonstrated significant trespass. Since this lot is located between two existing fences, people cannot cut across the property as a short cut to Rosewood. However, adding a fence and gate across the front of this property will have little visual , impact. Approving this request, however, would set a precedent for other exceptions to the Ordinance. Recommendation: - Staff respectfully requests that, after review, the Commission : reject`this request. Attachments: 1. Applicant's Letter 2. Applicant's Graphic . 3. Staff Graphic � planning\pcfence3.mem *• _ . � 4957 Abbott Rd. Lynwood, CA 90262 June 3, 1996 Planning Commission Go Robert Diplock Planning manager Ciry of Lynwood, California Dear Mr. Diplock: My name is Ana M. Srambila, owner of property located at 4957 Abbott Rd., city of - Lynwood. I hereby request to be permitted to build a fence on the front of my property, due to the fact of the following: _ - The need to keep off trespassers. Young "taggers" have come and defaced my property. • My three year old daughter likes running out into the street. • I have two teenagers and a toddler that stay home alone while I am at work . and i fear for their safety. • Their is construction being done on the corner of Abbott Rd. and Atlantic. A restaurant named" EI Gallo Giro" is being built and we don't know how late it will stay open. It could have people around all night long, very close to my house and children. I understand that having a fence will not stop all intruders from trespassing, but it certainly will make them think twice. I am wil�ing to put up any kind of fence that you will agree to. Please consider all the above facts. I am a single mother trying to protect her three chiidren. Please grant me permission to make my home a safer place to live in. Sincerely, Ana M. Brambila � - - �"'aG�rJ • � � Abbott Rd. existing Fence proposed Pence existing fence L� � I �/ 2�{- F.,i � ��\ I }- � . ..� ,G `�'�� . l�l --�jl �i��'7 I r' ��- - 1 f�1�� ri��cf � D ._. , N �, r-. . n - i � .� �.. � <�: � . � � � Z � � � S � C O � _ � cn ° —� � j � , . , - - -- -- '� y'`1Si 4`ts� 4`i4�S �l7 I 4� 77 �`� �S D D < C I � ,;, � � � !� � � � `�'� ; , , � �� ,- � ,�, �' � - , , � r � � , . , �, —, ! � �1-Cc.i<. � - . —� � Cii � �� I J=��N � /-7N F� /(/C ��. � 1 I `G(�(,�`��J� '� �£J�C � ABBOTT RD. � , I �. 3 _ ` : , -. . i i :��'' ��.I• , � , .� >. , . , ,.. - 4`�� , ,,,. � � �� 1�' 7 9 �6` ` , `�� , • A ✓ Ff � jA � t�.��, �COMI`11SSION � � � . � �. ;� YL � h ts DiYect t DepaY tment '\ T�� GazY�ity DeveloPmen eY � Mana9 FgOM: C � m �t DiPlO�k� planning � `R { � BY� ge: APProval Of AutO Rep ; �, •-�ft of Letter to Coun�Luther King Blvd. Jr. i CTt.�'`'ility at 3a00 Martin � gVB�E i � ` imission directed, attaChed iS a draft of a memo from th2 � As thn to the City Council concerning the approval of Auto ;' Comm�cility at 3800 Martin Luther King Sr. Blv3, i ' Re p; \ � '` C ndation: °, ti � R �t t� � and discuss issue and direct st�ff to take whatever action th; Cermined by the Commission. fur , , � � i i i � ! ` ' � � � i ' I � ' I ' � , , I ' , � � , ; � � ; ; I ; . I � � ` �� i � ; , � � � i , � � I �� ; i � ; i � , � I ; , � � I l , � � , ; � � , I � � � � � � ; ( � , � , � , � , i l� � i �� i �i - �` , ' � `r ; . _�-.��, .�. ::. .. . . ( � �i,rE� �`��1. �- - DATE: June 11,' 1996 e /'� j ` I . .',"` : t�i�. ' � ,_r..,� TO: ' I PLANNING"C�MMISSION � ' FROM: Gary Chicots, Director � � Community Development Department � , BY: Robert Diplock, Planning Managerl I I SUBJECT: .Draft �of Letter to Council Re: Approval of Auto Repair � Facility at 3800 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. I . � . i i As the Commission directed, attached is a draft of a memo from the Commission to the City Council concerning the approval of Auto � Repair Facility at 3800 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. \ Recommendation: ',. \ Review and discuss issue and direct staff to take whatever action is determined by the Commission. , a.. � _ _ -- �i I � ' -. I . 1�� DATE: June 18, 1996 �.. TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL - FROM: Planning Commission SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF BUSINESS LICENSE FOR ZABIETTA'S AUTO REPAIR ' . 3800 Martin Luther KinQ Jr. Boulevard (C-2 Light Commercial Zone) . , The Planning Commission has reviewed the approval of a business license for an auto repair facility at 3800 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, immediately north of City Hall at the intersection of Bullis Road. On two occasions, the City,Council has imposed a moratorium on automotive uses and expressed concern about the over concentration of automotive repair facilities in the City. The Commission questions why this business was approved without going through the same process that other automotive uses were required to follow - i.e. special review by the City Council to determine if the project should be exempt from the moratorium because it would further the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. Backaround _�In 1994, a business license was issued for a Mobil Gas Station and Snack Bar - on this site. The business license was renewed as a_. Mobil Station and snack bar on 2/09/95. On 4/04/95, the owner requested a revised business license to specify use as "General Auto Mechanic and Snack Bar". At the time of this request for a change from a gas station to an auto repair facility, staff should have required an application for a conditional use permit. On July' 5, 1995, the Council adopted Urgency Ordinance 1416 establishing a moratorium on most automotive related uses. That moratorium was extended'until July 5, 1996 by Ordinance No. 1419 on August 15 1995. On 10/02/95, staff received a letter from a representative of the owner saying that the auto repair facility.at this location had been closed as of July 23, 1995 and asked for any refunds. A letter was sent saying that no refunds could be made. On November 11, 1995 the City Council adopted an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance which prohibited auto repair facilities in the C-2 ' Zone. I , A week or so before 3/30/96, the current lessee came to the Planning Department to ask about reopening the auto repair business. Staff told the applicant that, since the business had ; been closed for over 90 days, this was considered a new use and that auto repair was now classified as a prohibited use in the C-2 , zone� In addition, a moratorium was in effect and the proposed use , could not be processed unless the Redevelopment Agency exempt the . project from the moratorium. I The applicant appealed that determination to the City Manager. His , determination was that, since the 1995 business license was valid until 1/O1/96, the business had not legally been inoperative for 90 __ days and therefore the application could be considered an extension of the existing business license: In part this determination was ' inade to retain economic activity in this location in conjunction with redevelopment of the adjacent restaurant and to continue a ' "business friendly" environment. i � The Business License representative was directed to issue the business license as a renewal of the previous license. I ,' � �� - ,� ;� � ', Code Enforcement Actions On 8/23/93 a notice of violation was sent to the owner/operator of the Mobil Station at this site for selling used cars without proper permits. Was abated on 9/07/93 and no further action was taken. On 5/22/96 a notice of violation was sent to current operator for improper signage, sale of used cars, and trailer on rear of property with full electrical connections. On 5/23/96 a notice of violation was sent to current operator for � improper business license (operator not the same as name on current business license). On 6/02/96 a notice of non compliance was sent (for signage and , used car sales). Owner has until June 13 to comply. i �onclusion . � � Although the Planning Commission understands the potential economic � development and business friendly environment that actions like i these create, such administrative decisions should be tempered with the understanding that a civic standard also should be maintained � to foster fairness and equity in the enforcement, of.business � license and zoning regulations. ` , � i � ; � ' -- - � � _ I i � � � � � , � �„ �. • „ �� . +'�'' ��I i � rt E e'i I ,. , E_ � t,�n � r; i 1�d �. . i f �lac ; p� ��ti�� l�iQ. — DATE: June 11, 1996 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Gary Chicots, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: DRAFT LETTER CONCERNING EXTENSION OF SPEED HUMP PILOT PROGRAM TO MAGNOLIA BETWEEN LONG BEACH AND BULLIS � � • I On.several occasions, Commissioner Evans has suggested that.the I City consider installing speed bumps on Magnolia Avenue between Long Beach Boulevard and Bullis Road. Two meetings ago, the ' Commission suggested sending a letter to the Traffic and Parking Commission requesting consideration of such a program. ! On May 21, the City Council approved a pilot program'to test speed "humps° (like bumps only flatter - see enclosed Public Works staff ' report). The Commission may wish to consider sending a letter i directly to City Council requesting that this pilot program be - extended to the Magnolia location. ' Attached is a draft of a possible letter. i � — . � .• i � 4 � { '.�' DATE: June 18, 1996 LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL C/O CITY MANAGER , CITY HALL 11330 Bullis Road Lynwood, California 90262 SUBJECT: Speed Hump Pilot Program _ HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL: On several occasions, the Planning Commission has discussed the problem of dangerous automobile speeds on residential streets in our City. We are pleased to see that your Council has approved a pilot program to study the effectiveness of speed humps, as used in other cities, in reducing the speed and consequent accident hazards on our City streets. We have been notified by the Block Watch captain that speeding is a major problem on Magnolia Avenue between Long Beach Boulevard and Bullis Road. This is a direct connector between two major north/ south arterial streets. Magnolia Avenue has parking only on one side of the street, which encourages speeding. There have been several accidents on this street over the past few months. . At its meeting of June 11, 1996, the Commission voted unanimously to requests that your Council consider expanding the speed hump pilot program to include installation on Magnolia Avenue between Bullis and Long Beach. This action will have the double benefit of increasing safety on this section of sireet and also providing an additional test of this speed control measure under a different set of road conditions. Yours truly, .. Carlton McMiller, Chairperson Lynwood City Planning Commission a I . . T 'r�'�lj `•)1 �:(3 C`+��P�.� �,�� , `' �� E _!`�6 �il.' DATE: May 2i, 1996 f�,•- ��5� � TO: THE HONORABLE MF'=0R F;_VD MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Faus�in Gonzale=, Citv Manager ' BY: EmiSio M. Pfisrga, '_;_rE��cr o£ Public Works[�� r-.��_.�'. . � Jose= Ker,�la, Ci•,�'_1 Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Speec Hur.� Pilot ?roaram - PURPOSE To recommend that ��e C�«i� Council authorize a Speed I-Iump Installation Piio� ?_ogram on residential streets, authorize the 'City Manager or his desigT_eA �c make the necessary funds appropriations ar.c �'_ansfers :c implement'the Speed Hump Pilot' Program, and tha� a`�e_ a siY moa�h review, staff report back to the City Cour_cil o,: ��s E:_�ct_veness and subsequently adopt a Speed H�mp Policies ��d P-ocec��:�es.- — BACKGROUND The problem or ve:�:'_c:'_a: ;-�s:ed_nc in residential streets has become mo_e prono�:�cec ae e�.�idear_ed by complaints received by staff. Or.e o£ t�:e s�°a:_ec_.ea beir.e tested by municipalities is the instaila�ior o_ saeec �..:.�:�s '_:: an effort to discoura'ge - speeding in..resitie::-i�� =_�-ee�s ANALYSIS At the preser,t time, _ize 5-.�:e ._ California Vehicle Codes does not list speed 'nus.ps as a_ o-:_1cza� "�raffic control devices" or "roadway fea`ures". ?�:e �-.a�_":�ss not developed policies, procedures or desi�es =c- �: �_::s`tallation of speed humps. Currently tney are a-- es;_�e: _:re-:-.:"_ device. �Staff pr000ses G S^ee: =. _�� P�ogram in order to determine the effec�s ei speec r.�un;>e �;�i l�cal traffic and whettier the installation of speec _,;:r.r._ '_��ca�i streets will reduce speeding. P. �rc£fic �:-. __: �e conducted before and after speed humps are ins�a'_ ec -o_ r_ne Pilot Program, in the interim, *_he City c�:: fo__!;:: _;-milar nolicy as set by the City of Compton (see attacned pa__cti�;. During the study period, staff can modify the polic•r anc <!es_c: standards to meet the speci£ic needs of the City cf �..nrro-_�c.. 1--- rhe end of a six (6) month period, staff wili re_...r: _c �..= City Council with a.report on the program. and the accp�:__:. �_' a City Policy on the installation �' o£ speed humps. Since the majority o� spee;;_ac �ehicle complaints have come from residents of Palm r�,�e, ��u: !�;_iis Road to Muriel Drive, sta£f proposes �o tes� t:�e c__o-. :;-oqr-_m at this location. The cost estima-e �o° �ne �-iot �rogram is $20,000. The City's FY 1995-96.Budget do=_•= �o� ��o��icie funds to finance this program. City Counci'_ can„aop�-ooria�e S2G,000 to finance this program. . �� RECOMIrIENDATION It is recommended �na� ��e Ci�� ouncii authorize a Speed Hump -- .. Installation Pilot Prpg_ar.. on residential streets, authorize the City,Manager or his desicnee to make the necessary funds appropriations and ��a._sfc_s tc implement the Speed Hump Pilot Program, and that a�:e- a s'�_ti r�nth review, staf£ report back to the City Council on its e�=ec�'_veness and subsequently adopt a Speed Hump Policies a.^,d Procedn�es. C96-026B . � � . AGII,'DA ITEM RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY' COUNCI-L OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AUTHORIZING A SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION PILOT PROGRAM, AUTHORZZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO MAKE THE NECESSARY FUNDS APPROPRIATIONS AND TRANSFERS TO IMPLEMENT THE PILOT PROGRAM, DIRECTING STAFF TO REPORT BACK •TO COUNCIL IN SIX MONTHS ON ITS EFFECTIVENESS AND SUBSEQUENTLY ADOPT A SPEED HUMP POLICIES AND PROCEDURES . .`°: WHEREAS; the City Council of the City of Lynwood intends to continue to improve public convenience and safety; and : WHEREAS, numerous complaints have been received by staff in certain areas of the city regarding vehicles speeding on _ residential streets; and WHEREAS, speed humps are being tested by municipalities and other governmental agencies as a way to discourage.speeding ' in residential areas; and WHEREAS, the City-of Lynwood does not have established policies and procedures for the installation of speed humps in residential streets; and WHEREAS, a pilot program can be implemented to determine their effectiveness in the City of Lynwood; and WHEREAS, in the interim, the City of Lynwood can use polices similar to those'of the City of Compton Policies and , Procedures to implement the pilot program; and WHEREAS, after a six month period, staff can evaluate � ; I and develop a Speed Hump Installation Policy and Procedures for � the City of Lynwood f,or subsequent adoption by City Council; and � ' . � WHEREAS the cost estimate for the pilot program is . � $20,000; and WHEREAS the proposed Speed Hump Installation Pilot Program is not included�in the FY 1995-96 budget. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lynwood does hereby find, proclaim, urder and resolve as follows: . Section L That staff is authorized to implement a Speed Hump Installation Pilot Program for the area of Palm Avenue from Bullis Road to Muriel Drive. ' Section 2. That City Manager or his designee is _ authorized to make the foilovaing £unds appropriations and ' transfers: -From To Unappropriated' Speed Hump Pilot Program General Fund $20,000 � $Z0,000 Section 3. That stafi report back io the City Council on theaeffectiveness-of the program in six months. Section 4. That based on the pilot program, staff develop a Speed Hump Installation Polices and Procedures for the City of Lynwood for review and subsequent adoption by the City .;- Council. '_ Section 5. That this resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.- ' PASSED, APPROVED.and ADOPTED this , day of , 1996. ' Paul H. Richards II, Mayor City of Lynwood ATTEST: . ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk FAUSTIN GONZALES `- ' City of Lynwood o City Manager APPROVED AS FORM: APPROVED THIS CONTENT: City Attorney Alfretta Earnest City of Lynwood Director of Finance Emilio M. Murga, P.E. Director of Public Works c96-026C : ._ .-, .. " ' " . � . . . . . � . ERHIBIT "A�� POLICY ON SPEED HUMPS Speed humps are an appropriate mechanism for.reducing speeds on �certain streets when properly installed under the right , circumstances. �Speed humps can be considered for installation' when, the . benefits normally derived by residents from a local residential ,. street are significantly diminished by the speed of traffic (even though there have been few or no reported accidents), as evidenced by a substantial majority of abutting residences signing a petition for-the installation of speed humps. Speed humps should only be used� on local residential streets (i.e., streets where the primary function is to provide access to abutting residences). Experience has shown that the average motorist reduces speed to approximately,l6mph to traverse a 3- inch speed hump. It would not be realistic to expect motorists on streets intended to serve more than just abutting residences to reduce speeds_. to lbmph every 300 £eet or so. Such installations would inevitably lead to extreme driver �`frustration and substantial negative public reaction to the concept of using speed humps for speed control, even at locations where they are clearly appropriate. Installation of speed humps on streets, other than local residential streets � could have potentially severe traffic safety consequences, almost certainly_affect emergency services and other serv,ice delivery activities, and likely create the diversion of large amounts of traffic bnto local residential streets which were.not intended for that purpose. . The majority of street mileage in Compton can clearly be classified as local residential streets. However, speed humps will not normally be considered for streets which are _„ - classified..as collector streets or higher in the City's General , � Plan, or which are determined to provide a transportation serv3ce to the community beyond that of simply providing access to the immediate abutting residences. There is no absolute criteria that clearly distingui'shes a purely local residential - . street from other relatively low-volume streets that provide important services to residents in addition to thoae immediately abutting the street in question. However, streeta �� - carrying less than 1,000 vehicles per day, are almost- always local residential streets, a�d streets carrying over 3,000 vehicles per day almost always provide important services to , � �the larger community. In the final analysis,"the suitability. ofra particular street £or the installation of speed humps will -:' have to be determined on a case-by-case basis. :_:�. , .. ... -:i'.i:ceF:;.'_ � - . � • - _ - . �' 'a � . ��. �� .� � . . . . , � � ' . � -, � k . , . .. . . .. � .�:C . . . . .. �,t� . . '. ,� . . � .';:��' . . ' . � �:<IY.� � � . . � � �l�' . . . . . �' .' .. � ... �. . - . - -2- Speed humps should be installed,on logical segments of local residential streets. They will not normally be installed in isolated blocks along a.continuous street, or on relatively short (less than 800 feet) cul-de-sac streets» A substantiel majority of residents on logical continuous segments of a local Xesidential street_ must support the iastallation of speed ' humps. Logical segmenrs are considered to be segments between arterial streets or, between natural discontinuities, such as jogs in the street. The cost of installing speed humps on relatively short cul-de-sac sEreets, cannot normally be justified. Streets eligible £or the instaTlation of speed humps shall meet the following criteria: 1. Have a speed limit of 25mph as determined in accordance with State Law. The need to reduce speed substantially.__at . speed humps would not make these devices appropriate for streets posted higher than 25mph because of the severe ` speed differential such an installation Would create along - the street. Severe differentials between the speed o£ the vehicles on a street are knoWn to contribute to traffic ' acciden[s. 2. The street sha11 be no more than one lane in each ' direction. -° •' 3. The street should not be a truck.route or a transit route:. 4. The street should not have grades greater than 5�. Propo'sed policies 1 through 4 above are identical to recommendations made by the California Traffic Control Devices Committee on Pavement Undulations, and are based on the best infarmation currently available. Speed•humps will only�be considered for installation on local residential streets determined by the Public Works Department . to have adequate vertical and horizontal alignment and sight ' distances to safely accommodate the installation of speed � humps. The street should not •be a primary access route for emergency vehicles. Factors to be considered are: , 1. whether the street is a primary route for emergency vehicles; • 2. Whether the installation of speed humps could cause a significant delay in the response emergencies. Speed humps are still an experimental roadway feature; therefore, additions, 'alterations, or removal of any or all speed humps may occur at any time. ,' ' Y; � :'v `�' I �, + ;''� . .. _ . . - 'rcr, , - . , � . . . . . � ' � � .. � � ' . � ��' � � . � I EXHIBIT I ��B�� PROCEDURES FOR TF� � � INSTALI�F.TION 0£ SPEED HL7�?�S - �, The Council's. adopted policies and procedures Por the installation oP speed humps will be ma'_e available to all interested parties. A representative of a local residentia2 street who believes the residents on his street will cupport the instaTlation oP speed humps, will submit a request in writing to t�e Engineering Division which vill connult with tho Polico and Fire Dapartments in making a determination of whether the street in question is eligible Sor further consideratioa for the installation oE speed humps �(i.e., the street is consistent with tha City Coun�il's policies for tha , installation of speed humps)• Upon determination that a straet is.r.ot eligible for spead humps, the representative(s) of the stree� will be notiPied in writing giving the reason why the street is not eligible. The representative(s) of the street will be givea PiEteen (15) days to appeal the decision irr writing to the City _ngineer. A report oP those streets determined to be ineligible w'_I1 be sent to the City Manager for distribution to the City Counc_1. StaPf.will review the original determination oP streets which are appealed. If staPf concludes their original decision is sti.11 valid, staPf will present the appeal to the City Council £or `inal determination if ` re�resentatives of the street wish the matte= to be referred to .the City Couacil. Upon determination that a street is eligible for further consideration, the representative of the st_eet will be advised to submit a petition (forms provided by the'C_ty) from the abutting property owners or residents indicating that a clear majority (65$ or more) support the installation oP speed humps on theiY- street.'_ The petition forms provided by the City wi3l state: . 1.. IE there is subsequently a desire by residents to remove the speed humps, the humps will only be considered for '-" removal after receipt of a petition from a substantial , majority {65� or more) asking for the removal; and, 2. Petition to be filed along with s_fficient funds for the removal of the speed hump (up to a maximum oP $}.,000 per � speed htunp) . . � The sponsor of the petition is reqti:ired .to contact every resident of the abutting properties on the subject street. If a resid`ent is against the speed humps, the vord "OPPOSED" will be . ._ . -1- ;: '� yi, _ . ,;r� y1 , ' - . �� '�:.. , - , .' ¢' - ' _ .< . , �. , � � . ;� ( i� � �' <�' �� .-� ' . .� . . - _ _ �; . ,, noted on the petition signature space. If the sponsor is unable to contact a resident; "NO CoNTACT" will be noted on the petition signature space with the days and times that contact was attempted. , It is required that _the sponsor make at least two (2) attempts on separate days to contact a resident. To be considered Por the program; signed petitions,must be ` received by the Engineering Division. . Upon verification of the petition, staff- will make every ' reasonable effort to notify the surrounding area of the proposal for speed humps on a particular street. Such notiEication may include information in City publications and neighborhood newsletters, when available, and in some instances, special signs posted on the street. If there is substantial opposition to the installation oP speed humps by people who travel the street on a regular basis, the City Engineer will consult with the various parties and attempt to reach consensus. IE agreement cannot be reached on a particular street, the matter will be rePerred to the City Council for final determinatioa. _ Upon verification of the petition, the City Engineer will make traffic .speed and volume measurements and review the trafEic accident history for the street in question. In addition, the City Engineer will submit the list of requests to the.Police and Fire Departments for their comments. In the event the number-•of requests for speed humps exceed the funds av�ilable, the City Engineer will rank the requests in a_-. recommended order of priority and submit these recoaunendations,to ' the City Council for approval. The priority list recommended Por approval will be based on traffic accidents, speed, traffic volumes and comments of the Police and Fire Departments. The City Engineer will set forth the basis for the recommended priorities in a report . accompanying the priority list. Unless there is an overriding consideration, such as high incidence of speed-related accidents -(a rare condition on most local residential streets), priorities will normally be es�ablished, . by multiplying the percentage of motorist exceeding 25 MPH by the 24-hour traffic volume of the street in question. A street yielding the highest numerical value resultinq from the above computation will be,considered to have the highest priority for •speed humps. Depending upon the number oP petitions received and the types o£ streets involved, it is possible that a"cut-oPf speed" (perhaps an 85th percentile speed oP 30 MPH) will be - established below which streets will not be considered for the program. • ` Tha, physical installation of spaed humps and the associatad traYfic control devices shall conLorm to Qasign standarda estabiished by tha Engineering Division. , _ ' �.. _ . ; �-`.: � _. � � i:4 � ' . ' 'i,a,�. , ' . . . . ., ' . �.l' - . . 'F . . . - ' . . .;y . .. F .. ' ��'�� ' - . . . . ;.; ,,; . . ' . . � . . ' . ��` . . ' ' _ _ `�.:� �: ' ' . , � � � . ' �. : . � . . � . ^,% � . � :. . ;. PETITION REQUESTING INSTALLATION OF SPEED �IUMPS � We, the undersigned residents of , from � � to � _ ` , do h�rcfiy rcqucst tho City of Compton to inslall spcxcl humps on our � ' - llKd �UUA � � . . � . street. We agree that if in the future we desire to remove the speecl humps, the humps will only be considerecf for removal aRer reccipt of a petition from a substantial majority (654'0 or more) asldng for the removal, along with suftcient funds for thcir removal (up to S t,000 per hump). ( I'he City may remove . any or all of the humps at any time for safety reasons at no cost to the abutGng property owners.) NEIGHBORHOOD REPRESENTATIVE: . � . ' NAMC ADDRLSS . . . . . ryqNBNU►1BpA � � Date (m/d/y). Signature Name (Printj Number & Strat (Prinl) DayGme Phone ll _ 1 , 2 g . 4 • � 5 • ,r.'A�t?�Rqh'9� i :»�,.,ir�«`:,c>h�.:� C„y,myr� L � . � . . . _ " . U . . _ 7 . . . ' ,:' - I 8 9 ' � 10 NOTE:° Plcasc add an asterisk (*) following your printed name if you are an apaitment manager or an omcer (give tiQe) of a condominium association (signing on behalf of your association). . r-.' A � _ � ` � REFLECTIVE WHIFE�� - � - � - PAVEMENT MARKINCa ` - 12' REFLECTIVE WHITE ' � , . STRIPES C� 6' ON CENTER I � . � 1' IYP. � � � ;r"��rn ��c��'�<'W 5' NP. � � -. . . � �"d�;.,,';,` '�'� . . . . . � � ca..:::3-.a.: . . . . . .. _ ----- --r z ---------- �-- --•------------------------- -� ^5��' � � � . � o ,� >...,..�..�:.....�......_......:: �o� g � g ' �'� � � 9 (>K >�i�- . � S ..Y ("� � } I 6 50' . ,_ � EDGE OF PAVEMENT '�� ,: i�r, � �y EXISTING GUTTER " �r C�' . ' TAPER � CUR9 �� 7 MAX , r - A.C. STANDARD � . FACE ' (WIDT . � � � VARIES) 3/8' MIX � . . � ' " ^ D2-AR-4000 �• . 5.6� ASPHALT WAFiNING FlAGS " . � TACK COAT B�NDEF . (FlRST WEEtq SECTION A-A so' x so• ��A B!!.M P S: W� NING SIGN . . . BIACK ON � YELLOW INSTALLATION DETAILS G SERIES 'E' IETTERS .. 1) SPEED HUMPS SHAi.� NOT BE PLACED OVER MANHOLES, �� - .- WATER GATES, JUNGTION CHAMBERS, ECT. � � � 2) EDGE OF SPEcD HUMP SHALL BE 5 FEET MINIMUM � S , W6'(15) SIGN � FROM EDGE OF�DRIVEWAY. _ MPH � � 3) WHENEVER POSSIBLE SPcED HUMPS SHALL BE . PLACED AT PROPcRTY LINeS INSTEAD OF MID-LOT. . � ` 4) AD ACENT O STq OS UMPS SHALL BE PL4CED SIGN ' ' COMBINATION - C 8 � m c`+ �o $ iC 3 �o m SI $ 8 NOTE: SIGN �LOCATIONS. , O O O � N" N N ry N n I I I I I I I I � � DIRECTED BY CIN ENGINEEq . � 'lNa l� � � � � ♦ � . -,.., ; ,; , ::: . � 1 I I I I I I I I I I_ I � �' SECTION B-B iz CITY OF COMPTON SPEED HUMP �aawN PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER sH�r 1 oF i 9 SueMirrE�: eP er 19 - ' - CHECKED I/ C/�/I^C�Gr---�' CRY ENGINEER �.. � . . . �: .. .. - �' ', � . '. ;� . - .'v . . . , . � � -.;(;5:�� - . .. . . � . . , . . . �� , � . . .. _ . � . _�,`�, . . t � � � .. . . � � ��,>a�Y� . d - � . . :"��' . . . . � � �;T . . . . _. :._ . � � ,. . � .�_t�.�S� � . „ _ .. .w 8 . � . . , SPEED HUMP ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS 7�OCAT ION CHLCKI,IST 1. Did a representative of a local residential street submit a request'in writing to the Director of Public Works. Yes No 2. Dces the street.meet the following requirements? (tiust meet all five requirements to qualify) Yes_ No_ • a. Does the Street have residences on both sides and have a speed limit of 25 MPH? Yes No b. Does Street have no more than one lane in each direction? Yes_ Ho_ c. Zs the Street a truck route or transit route? Yes_ No_ d. Does the street have grades greater than 5� ? Yes • No e. Does the street have adequate horizontal and vertical ' alignment and sight distances to safely accommodate speed humps? Yes No I 3. Police Department Concurrence Yes_ No , a. Is the street a primary route for emergency vehicles? Yes_ No_ b. Will the installation of speed humps cause a _ � significant delay in the response to emergepcies? Yes No '� , • � °5 ` ' C . _, � � ��'.��! . � . :;;FS� . . � - ��~�� - �� :��'� .. . . . . . � � `�.. 1 . c�r:. . .. - 1 �, . ..,.. . :- . SPEED HUtSP REQUIRF�t'�T C��K LIST CONTINUED — 4.. Fire Department Concurrence Yes_ No_ a. Is the street a primary route for emerger.cy vehicles? Yes Ho b. Will the installation of speed.humps cause a significant delay in the response to emergencies? - Yes No ' 5. Does the request for speed humps maet all of the above. requirements? Yes No 6. If the answer to "5" is "Yes" then notify the resident to - circulate a petition? Sent notification? Yes_ No_ 7. If the answer to "5" is "No" then notify the resident his request has been denied and he will have 15 days to appeal to the.City Engineer in writing. Sent notification' Yes_ No_ i 1 tr92-117 �:.._ 1 �. ' S'v . . � . ' ,'. � � � ;� ' 4 , . ,:.,�.. . . . � . :<Yr. � . �'' �S . i � �? I y_ ' - °, � �;�r�` .�. . _ , � �:�ri�,l� if= �� f1U ,,, r ' � � � i1'� . r. ,,�: _ " DATE: June 11, 1996 T0: PLANNING COMMISSION � - FROM: Gary Chicots, Director ,� / ' Community Development Departmen��'V BY: Robert Diplock, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Population and Housing Estimates for 1996 ._ Attached are population an housing estimates for 1996 from the State Department of Finance. These estimates are prepared every year from information on building permits and school enrollment submitted by local jurisdictions. According to these estimates,_ Lynwood's population increased slightly from last year. . Total Population Housina units 1995 65,684 14,652 1996 65,934 14;660 ' i . , i � i REPORT E-5 LOS ANGELES COUNTY POPULATION AND HOUSING ESTIMATES . CA. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE � PpGE 19 January 1. 19% � DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH UNIT - HOUSING UNITS -------------'-'--'""-----� PERSONS� � CONTROLLED - ---'-" POPULATION --"'-- '---'---'------------'----� . . PER HOUSE GROUP - SINGLE ---- --- MULTIPLE -- MOBILE OCCU % HOUSE , CITY TOTAL HOLO UAQ RTER TOTAL DETACHED ATTACHED 2 TO 4 5 PLUS HOMES PIED VACANT HOID AGOURA HILLS 21174 21174 O 7038 5135 1060 171 - 663 9 6716 4.58 3.153 ' ' "_'_"_""'__'______'_"_'_"'__'___'__"_"__'___"_"_'___"'_'__"'_"__'____'__'_____'__"_'______'_'__'_____ __"'______'____" ALHAMBRA �� BB518 86445 2073 30088 12620 2954 � 4091 10403 __20 28700 4.61 3.01 � '____'___'_____"_"____'_______'_____'_"___'__"_'_ "'__ "__'__"__'___'__" _' _"_' _"_' _ "' _"_' _"' _"_ - ARCADIA .. 52063 51389 674 20092 � 11991 1380 1464 . 52<5 �Z �8925 5'8� 2'��5 '_"'_'__'_ '_'_"_'___'__'__'___'__"""__'_'__"_"_"__"___'__'__'__'_'_'_""__"'_'_'_""_'__'_"__ "_'_'_'_'____'_'_ __"__'_ � ' ARTESIA 16384 15848 536 � 4574 3206 310 252 709 97 4433 3.08 3.5 "'_'___"_"___"_'_____"_"__'_'___'_ ___'_'_______'__'__"___'_" "'_'____'_'___'__"_"'_"'__'_'_________'_____'_'____'___'_'___ AVALON 3403 3397 12 2171 444 452 565 705 5 1392 35.88 2.436 � __'________'_____""_'___"___"__'_______"'_"___'_"___'___'__"__"__'_____"'__'_'_'____'_____________"__ _'__'___'_"_______' ' AZUSA 43970 42709 1261 13390 5618 1901 1411 �3067 �593 12802 3.33 "'__"'_ . "'_"____"'__"'______'___'__'_____'__'___'__'___'_____'___'_____"__'_"_ ' . ' __""_'__'_"_"___""_"________'___ BALDWIN PARK 73502 72921 581 17392 11637 1632 617 3104 402 16820 3.29 __4_33 '_'_'_""'__"_'_"__'______ __"'____'__"_'____________'___"__'_'_'____'____'___'___"____'___'__'__'_____"___'__'_"__ BELL " 36404 36041 363 9448 3556 1080 1788 2595 429 9058 4.13 3: - "_____'__"__'_'___'__"'__'______'_'_______"_'_'___'_'___'__'__�____'____"_____'___'__' _"'__'__'_'_'_'__'__"________'__"_'_ " BELLFLOWER 65264 64649 615 24334 11477 1727 1634 7960 1536 23117 __5_03 _2_79 � '_'_" " "_____"___'___'_____'_'____'__"__'-_'_'_'___"________'______"' _'_'_"__'__'__"'_'_______"'___'_'_'__ . 'BELL GARDENS 43736 43205 531 9650 4013 1908 1566 1732 431 9344 3.17 4.6 _'_'_"____"___'"_____'___"'_____'___' _'_'_'___'______'______'_'_'___"___"__"__'__"_"___'__"__'_____"_'____'__'___'__'_______ BEVERLV HILLS 33276 33201 75 15741 � 5625 220 1597 8294 5 14581 7.97 2.Z ' "_"'___""'__"__'__"'___ "___"'____'_'__'__'___"'__'____'___"'___'__'____'_'_'_"_"_____"___'_'______________'___'__'___'_ BRADBURY � 890 890 O 291 - 280 5 O 6 O ._276 5_15 3.22 '________"_'____'_________'____"'___' '_'_____'__'____'___'_______'__'_____'__'_'_'____-_"_____"'__"_____' BURBANK 101424 100575 849 42777 19518 7554 4808 16802 95 40763 4.71 2.4 "___"'____""___"_""'__'_____'___ __"_"_____"____'_________"___'_____'__'_________"_'_______'__"'_'____'_'____"_'_______ CALABASAS 18825 18747 78 7915 4956 945 187 1479 348 7108 10.20 _2_63 � "____'________'_"_"'__"______"_"_'_'__'_"'__"__"____"__'___'_'_____'___"_____"_______'___________'__'___"__'___ . . � CARSON 88143 87649 494 24818 17446 1926 597 2290 . 2559 24175 2.59 3.626 . . 'i � '__"_'_'__'____'___"____________'_________'__________'___'__'_'_"_'_'___'_'__________'_'_ _'_'___""__""__""__"__' __'_"__"_ . CERRITOS� 55329 55223 106 _ 15445 13220 1226 458 537 __ _4 __ _I5105 __Z_20 3.6 __""___ _'_'____"__""_"________'____'__"____"_"'_"__"'________"__'_______"_'__ _ � '__'_____"'_"___- , CLAREMONT 34028 29747 4281 .11364. 8111 894 524 . 1832 3 10988 3.31 2.. . "'__'"__"_'_"'�'__"____'"___'_'"_""' '_'__" "'______'_'___"_______"'_'___'__'_'__"_'_______"___'____'_"____'_________'____'_ COMMERCE 12716 12602 174 � 3430 1969 535 285 639 2 3346 2.45 3.76 ' '_"__'______"____"""__'_ "__ � " COMPTON 93268 92533 735 23343 15933 1493 2480_____2855_"_'_582-'___22423 • 3.94 4.1 __'____'__'___'_'_ � _""_'_'__"_'___'_'_"__"___'_'______"_'_____'_____"__'____ ' __'_" "'_'_______'_'___ COVINA 45931 45352 579 16338 9155 1179 918 4564 522 15751 3.59 2.8 •. _"__________'_"___'_'__"____'________'_'___'___'__'__"___"__'___'_'__"'____'___________"'__'___" ___'_"___'__"____"'____"_ CUDAHY 24400 24390 70 5470 i6V4 1187 449____'1810'___'_420_____'5313'____2_87 4.59 ___'__"_""__"'______'_____"____"_______"_ __'_'_'__ ' '_'____'_'___"_'___'___'__'_'__"_" "_ , CUWER CITY 40519 39582 � 937 17176 6405 1474 2244 6831 162 16331 4.59 2.42 ' """___'____"'_'__"______"_'__"__"_____'__'_"___________'____'______"________"____' '___""_""__'__'""__""'_"'_'_'"____ ' DIAMONO BAR - 55993 55993 0 17862 12569 2667 495 1863' 268 __ 3.2 � . ____"__'___"___'__'______"__"___'_"'__""__'_"'___"'_'______'__"_' , "_'_"" '___""_'_"____'_'___"___' ' � OOWNEY 97573 95648 1925 34528 �20037 1368 1431 71493 199 . 33230 � 3.76 2. . '__"'_'_"'____"_'____'_'_____'____'_"_'_'__""______"__ "'___"__'_____'___"_'_"____"______"__'__________'__'_"_____"__"_ � . � DUARTE 21900 21197 703 6861 4105 923 293 1329 211 6630 3.37 3.197 '_'___"___"___'_'__"_'_'___"__'__'__'-_'__._'__""_"__'_'__"__"___'_'___'_'_"__'_"_"__"____'_' •� - .. � . . " � REPORT E-5 LOS ANGELES COUNTY POPULATION AND HOUSING ESTIMATES CA. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE . , -� PAGE 20 � January 1, 1996 DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH UNIT �POPULATION ------ - HOUSING UNITS ---- -- PERSONS CON7ROLLED PER _'__'_' "'_____"____'_____"_____'_ I � NOUSE- GRO�P ---- SINGLE --- --- MULTIPLE -- MOBILE OCCU % HOUSE- CITV TOTAL HOLO OUARTER TOTAL DETACHED ATTACHED 2 TO 4 5 PLUS HOMES PIED VACANT HOLD � EL.MONTE 113302 111505 1797 27611 14773 2942 2108 6266 1522 26558 3.81 4.199 � EL SEGUNDO 16060 -_-- 16060 '-'-'--0'------7328--_-" 3150 --'-- , _'__"___'_'__'______'______' 1 6903 5.80 2.327 GARDENA 56808 '--'S5942--'--'866-"-'-20967--_-'-8969-_-" 1033-'---2752'-'-'7045"-_-1168-'-" 19998_ "'- 797 GLENDALE 193452 190549 2903 73545 26035 3452 6735 37291 32 69966 4 87 2 723 _"_'___'___'"___'_____'_'___ ___"_"___"__'_-_""'____'_'___'__'_'___'____""______'_'_"'___'____'___'__-_"'____"'_'__'_'____ . � GLENDORA 51232 50445 �787 17428 12730 1142 582 2101 __ _873 16861 3.25 2.99 .. . . "_"_'_'_'___"__'__'""___"________"__"____'___'___'__'____"'___'___' '_______'__'___'_'_" _"_'____'__'__" � HAWAIIAN GARDENS 14508 14448 60 3567 1538 429 364 985 251 3442 3_50 4.198 � ___'__ HAWTHORNE--'_'---'_--"76�13--"_7611'1-"'-_602'_"--29472" "--8358---_'1812"--'3315'---15777'-_"-210'---'27377-_-- 7.11 2.780 . __'_'__"__"___"'_'__'___'_'__'___'__'____"__"___"_'___"__'______'_____"________'__'_'_'__'__'___'___'__"___'_ .. ' _'____'_______ � HERMOSA BEACH � 18681 18666 15 9758 3858 943 2360 2520 `__ _�� 923�_ 5.34 2.021 � , __'______'_"'__ _.'_"__"'-"_'____ ____'___'______'___'_'_"________'"__'__'__""'__"'"__"___"_"'_"_'_____ . � HIDDEN HILLS 1864 1864 � O 548 541' 6 0 1 O 529 3.47 3.524 .� , '__"'____"___'__'__'__"_'______'__'_'__"'__"__'___"_"__'__"'__'___"_'__'___'___'_"___'__"__"___________' - '________"___'_ � HUNTINGTON PARK 60171 59852 319 _14698 4898 1807 2551 5431 __ 11 14079 4_21 <.2 1 __'___'__'___'___"'__"___'___""______'"__"____"__"__'__'_"__ ___'__"_ INDUSTRY � 687 384 303 139 120 5 2 , 4 8 106 23.74 3.623 , � ___'_"________'___'________'____"_'__'___'_'____'___" "'__'______'___"__"'___'__________'___ ' "___"___'_________""______'___' � ' INGLEWOOD 116032 174567 1465 39156 13692. 2744 �5215 17228 ___ 277 36515 " 6.74 3. ' '_'___"_'_'__'____'__'______"__"___"_'_"__"'""'__"__'__"'________'____' _____'_"'_'_____ ___'_"_'____"'_' ' IRWINDALE 1090 1090 ' O 288 272 7" 1 2 . 6 276 "' 4_17 3.949 ' "_"__"___"'________"_'___""__'_'___"__""__'__'___"___'"___'_""""_"___'___'_____'______"'__ '____'__' LACANADA FIINTRIDGE 20018 19855 163 6977 6524 _ 191 76 _184 __ 2 _6751 3_24 2-941 "' _ ' _ - LA HABRA HEIGHTS 6541 6541 0 2216 2190 17 � 1� 6 2 2144 3 25 3.051 __'__ _"" __"__ ___""____'__'__'_"___"__"""'_"_'_"""____"______'_"___'___"_'__'____"_""" . _"_'_'_' "'_'___'__"__"" � LAKEWOOD � 77149 77051 98 27268 22281. 598 ' 461 ' 3829 '_' " 99 "' 26563 __ 2 ' 2_9 '_'__" "__'_'_ _"__"'___'_'___'____________'_____'_ '_ . LA MIRADA � 45776 44214 1562 14460 11635 521 278 1876 150 13785 � 4.67 3.207 '"_____"__'___'_____' _"_"__"__"""'___'_"'__'__"'_'_'__"____'_""__'__"'_"""'_____""___"__"_____'_"'_"___'_"___ � LANCASTER 121023 112640 8375 41419 26168 942� 2720_"__7485_"__4104_____37627____'9�_16 2. ___'_'___"'""'_"'_""___"_'__'_'_'__"__'___""'___"__'_'_"'__"'___'_'_'___"_' "______' . � LA PUEN7E 40385 40053 332 9709 6307 521 __ 346_ __2452 -__ 83 9431 2_86 4.247 � _'___'__'______'__"___'_" "' _'_______" __'_ ___ ""'_"'___""__'____'_'___"_"'_ " LA VERNE 32304 31732 572 11268 7195 ' S74 799 945 __ 1755 __ 10890 3 35 2.9 � ___"__'_"'___"'___'______" "__"_____'""__'__'______________"'____'__'______"__"_'______'"_ '_____ _ _'_ LAWNDALE . 29472 29352 120 10143 5288 1263 915 ___2410_ _ 267 9571 5_64 3.067 . ___""'_________ __'__"__ IOMITA----"--'-_"'-"20091"--_19922"'_--169-"'--_8315"--'-4043 742 646 2368 516 7928 4.65 2.513 � ___""____'__"___'_'_'___'___"___'___"_"_'______'__'___'_____"____"___"'__'___'__'_ __'__"'____'_'___'______'"_____"__"__'_ LONG BEACH 437780 427984 9796 172346 69056 8647 24842 67535 2266 159760 7.30 2.679 . ____'_______ __c'_"_'_________"'__'__"__'_"'__"_"_""'__"__""'___"_'__""_"_"'___"_____"______'___'_ LOS ANGElES 3638148 3562152 75996 1325055 515075 79178 124999 598137 7666 1240168 6.41 �2.872 LYNWOOD 65934 64771 ' 1163 14660 ' 8339 ' ' 1068 '- 1959 -- 3210 -'-' 64 -' 14290 " 2-52 " 4 533 REPORT E-5 LOS ANGELES COUNTY��POPULATION AND HOUSING ESTIMATES CA. DEPARTMEN7 OF FINANCE . ' , , PAGE �- 27 � � " January 1, 1996 . ' � �DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH UNIT � i CONTROLLEO ------- POPULATION ------ �----------------------- HOl15ING UNITS ---------------- -- PERSONS � PER , � � � HOUSE- GROUP ----- SINGLE ---- --- MULTIPLE -- MOBILE OCCU- ti HOUSE- - CITV TOTAL HOLD OUARTER TOTAL DETACHED ATTACHED 2 TO 4 5 PWS � HOMES PIED VACANT HOLD � � MALIBU 72178 12076 102 6008� 3645 554 , 429 693 687 4999 16.79 2.416 _"'__'__________'_'_'___'_"'__'__'___'_"_"'_""__________"'____"'_"'_'___"_-"____'___"___'________'______'_""_"_______' ' MANHATTAN BEACH 33904 33903 1 14997 9948 1237 2794 1015 3 �14280 4.78 2.374 � '____"'_________'__'__'_""__'___'_'_'_"_'_"___'____'__'____'_"'_"__"___'___________"'_"'______'___'_____"___"_____'_____ MAYWOOD � 29155 28987 �168 6665 � 2707 978 1475 1499 12 6482 2.75 4.472 _"'__'______'_"'__"__'_'__'_'_'___'_'_'_'_'_'_'__'____'_________'_'___'______'_'___'__"___"'_'__"'___'_'___'___"'__"________ � MONROVIA 38910 38673 237 14380 7645 1560 1409 3512 254 13657 5.03 2.832 _"'__'___"__'__'___"'_'_____'__'_'___"'_"__'_'__'__"'___________'__"__'__"____'__'___'__'_"_____'______'_'______'___"'___' MONTEBELLO ' 62135 61682 453 /9301 9236 1383 2978 5497 207 18723 2.99 3.294 '___"'_"'__"_"___"""___'_"'___'__""_______'___'__'____"__'____"_"______"_"______"_'__________'_'_"__'___"_""_"' � . MONTEREV PARK 63957 63686 271 20540 11486 1977 � 2121 4897 59 19737 3.91 3.227 � � . __"_"____"""___"__'_'___"__""_"'_"______"___""_"___"'__'_'__________'_'___"__"_'___"____'__'___""_'_'__'__'___' . ' NORWALK 99787 � 97521 2266 27664 20006 1221 829 5135 473 26749 3.31 3.646 � '____"__"_""'___""'_"'_'_____"__'__"_"""_""_____"_'___""__""""___"_______'_""____'____'______"_'__'______'_' . ' PALMDALE 111980 111881 .� 99 . 37736 - 28761 574 910 5522 1969 34094 9.65 3.282 '_""__""__'_"_'___'_""____"_'____'___'___'___"'______'_____"_____________"'__'_'_"_'_"'__"___"_______'______'_____"_ ' . � PALOS VERDES ESTATE 13970 13958 12 5161 4762 35 34 329 .1 4975 3.60 2.806 � __"_"'__'__"'__"'_"_"_'__"'_"____"""____"_'________'_'____'_____"'__'____'___'_'__"__'____"_'___"_____"'____'_'____ PARAMOUNT 53906 53547 . 359 14611 5896 1735 1039 4442 1499 13831 5.34 3.872 - . : "_'___'__'__"'_____'_______'___'_"'__'_______"_"______'_""'________"'__'___""____'__'__'__"'_______'__'_____"___'_"____ ' � PASADENA 137136 133320 3816 53962 24959 '3598 �4737 20644 24 51079 5.34 2.610 "___"_'_"__"'___'______"___'___"___'_"__'_"_'___'_'____'___"'___"__'_'_'____'_'__'_"""""'___"_'____"____'_"___'_'_ . ' . PICO,RIVERA � 61113 60692 421 . 16321 12294 706 243 2605 473 16007 1.92 3.792 "_"_'_'_"___"'_"__'___"__'_'__"__'___'________'_'_____"___'_'__"_______"_'___"_____'___'____'________'____'__'___'_"___' POMONA 139792 137055 2737 39137 23498 2847 3185 7771 1836 37078 5.26 3.696 � __'__"'_'_"'___"_'_____"'_"'_'_'___'_"'_'_'_""'_____"_'______'__'_'__'_"'_______"___"_'_'_"___'_'_________'____'___"__ . � RANCHO PALOS VERDE$ 42670 42246 424� 15610 12005 1113 213 2274 5 -15080 3,40 2.807' . � '_"'_"'__""'__"'____'__'________"___"'_'_______'_""___'__'_"_______'__'_'_____________________"_____"'___c__"_""_____ .. REDONDO BEACH 63913 63874 39 28798 11199 3891 4024 9592 92 27264 5.33 2.343 • � '__"___""____'_'_"""_'_'_____'__"'_"_'__"'__"'_________"_'____""_""'______'____'__"_"__"'____"'___'__'_"_'_'____ � ROLLING HILLS 1978 1978 O 682 680 1 O 1 O 644 5.57 - 3.071 _____""__"__'____'_____'____'____"_"'____'_______'__"'__'___"_'______'_______"_____'_""_"'__'___""______'_"___'__'____ , ROLLING HILLS ESTA7 8189 8189 O 2926. 2272 598 23 31 2_ �2849 2.63 �2.874 _ _""____'_'___"""______"__"___'__'_'_"_"_"_"_'_'____'_'___"______"__"___"___'___"_'__________'_'_________'____'_'____ ROSEMEAD 54487 53839 648 14238 9667 1838 884 - 1460 389 13801 3.07 3.901 __'__'__'___'__'_____"'_"__"'_"_'__'___"___"__'___""_"____'___"_'_'_'_'_'_'_"_'____'___'___"_'____"'_"'____"'____"'_ ' SAN DIMAS 35082 33942 1140 11827 7327 1685 313 1602 900 11280 4.63 3.009 , ___" " "__"_'_'_'_"'_'____"__'_'__'_________" "'_'_____________"____'__'__'_________"'___" '___________'_____'_'___' . -� - SAN FERNANDO 23579 23328 251 5967 3803 523 700 836 105 5801 2.78 4.021 . � - "__'_____'_'_'___'__'_____'_'_""'___"'___'___'__'____"__"__'_____"""__'___________"'_"_________'_______'_'_"___'__"___' ' � SAN GABRIEI 39594 39051 543 12811 7144 880 953 3804 30 12288 4.08 3.178 "_"'_"__'___'_""___"___'__"'_'__'_"'___"_____"'___""_____"____"_"_'_"__'______"_'_""'_______"__'_'___________"'_ ' SAN MARINO 13402 13287 � 121. 4470 4433 20 2' 11 '4 4308 3.62 3.083. _________'__'_'_"___"'____'__'_'_"____"'_" "'__'____'____'__"___'__" "__'_'________'___'__' _"'__'_______'_____'____ SANTA CLARITA 129861 128706 1155 46556 26431 5985 1799 10145 �2196 43625 6.30 2.950 . '__'_""__"____'___"__'____'__'___""_'_____""__""'____""'___'_", "'______'__"___'_'_"_"'_"'___'___"'___'____""'_' . '- - SANTA FE SPRINGS 15697 15677 20 4646 3025 265 107 1128 121 4491 3.34 3.491 � "_""_'__'_______'_'____"'_'__'_"'_"___'___""____"'____""______'_'__"__"__'__'___"__'_"__'_"__"_______'___""_'__'_ � SANTA MONICA 90262 87913 2349 48268 9139 1804 6016 3f053 256 45344 6.06 1.939 "__'____'__'____'_"___'_'_""'_'___'___""_______'__"'_"__"_______"'__'______________""_""___'____'______'_"___""_"_ � i ' . , � � , ._. _ ..'"— '_ . " _ ".___ _—_ , ' ' � REPOR7 E-5 � LOS AMGELES COUNTY POPULATION AND HOUSING ESTIMATES ' CA. DEPARTMEN7 OP FINANCE ' PAGE 2z � , � January 1. 1996 DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH UNtT ' POPULATION ------- HOUSING UNITS ----- PERSONS CONTROLLED PER . ___"__ _'_______"__'_'__'__"'___'_ . � NOUSE- GROUP --- SINGLE ---- --- MIJLTIPLE -- MOBILE OCCU- % HOUSE- � ' C�ITY TOTAL HOLD OUARTER TOTAL DETACHED ATTACHED 2 TO 4 5 PWS HOMES PIED VACANT HOLD SIERRA MADRE 11171 11051 /20 4897 3383 290 __ 373 _ 846 5__ 4657 4_90 2.373 � '__'_ _____'___"__'_'__'_'__"__'_______"__'_"'_"'____'_ ' _'___' '__"__ '_'_____'_ � SIGNAL MILL � 8776 8758 18 3770 913 475 780 1601 1___'__3461'___'8.04 2.52 '__'"__'__'____'_""_____'_______"_"___'__"__"'"_'__'_______'_'__"'_'__'""_'___'______'___ " _'_____ _'__'__'_ SOUTH EL MONTE 21755 21596 159 4849 3108 316 305 542 578 __4756 __1_92 4_ '__"___'__ "'__""___'____'-_'_"____"'_'_"___"'____"__"'__"_'_'______'______""'_'_'_"'__'___ . SOUTH GATE 91057 90804 253 22986 12325�_ 2209 ___3928 4218 306 _22467 2.26 4.042 . . _""'__'_"__"'_ "'___"__'___'___ � . . _'_"____'__"_'___'_______"_"'_"__""_"_"__"_'_"__"___'______ ; SOUTH PASADENA 24868 I 24610 258 10790 4863 611 ___1248 ___4066 _ 2__ 10300 4.54 2.389 .. " '_"' '_"__'_ , . ___'__'__'__" '___'_____"__ -!'_"__'_'_"_'_______"'__"'_"__"'_'"_"'__' . ' TEMPLE CITY 33039 32516 523 11722 9420____ "463'_'__1165___"___9__"'11221 _ 4.27 2.8 � . " _ __"'_" _'__ "'___"_'__"'__'__'__"___'__'___""_'__"___'__'__"'___'_'"__'_", � TORRANCE 139820 138740 1080 55838 30110 3179 3243 18225 __1081 53487 __ 4_21 2.584 "__'____""_'__"__'__'"__"'_"__'_.'_""_"""__'__"__ '_'___'__ VERNON --' '--' ""' 8� -- -�5' 6 30 11 4 2 13 O 28 6.67 2.679 � '_"_"._'__'__"__'___'___'_'___'__'___'_'_"_'____"____'_'__'_'__'__"'__'____'__"'__"_' '_'____'__'""___'__"'_"_"_____""_ ' ' WALNUT . 31598 31572 26 8546 8051 96 14 '' 201 ' - ' 184 " ' 8287 "'__ 3_03 ' 3_810 __'___" " "__'_______'_____"__'_______'_______'__'___'_ � WEST COVINA 101906 101403 503 31596 20535 2584 . 1387 6804 286 30564 . 3.27 3.318 "____'_'__'___'___"'__""'__'___'___"____'________"___"__"__'_______"__'____ _"___"_'__""__'____________"__"_'____"__"__ . WEST HOLLVWOOD . � 37177 36763 414, 24075 1731 816 1862 __19660 6 _ 22809 5.26 1.61 . � ___"""__ """____"__'__' '__"'__'_'___'_'_""'_"_'__"____'___""_"'___"____"__"______" . � � WES�IAKE VILLAGE 7832 7832 O 3058 ____ 1982 _ 642 ____ 75 ___ 202 157 2879 5.85 2.720 WHITTIER � 82511 79723 2788 29139 1B856- 1261 2164 6658 200 2B003 3 90 2 84� . � : '__'__'______'____"__"'____"________"'__'___'_____'___ . . ' ♦tRt�t��l�t�W�<tY�t4t#��?ti�tkfA�tiM1W4t��iRi��ltiYWYf�t��lR�tt�t�tk4�RlRktt#rttitit<tiWit�tt414rtrttifirttttt�#>iXtRtktktiM4tti�tilrtM<�R♦ � �- INCORPORATED 8392082 8243307 148775 -2954395 1370915 193033 268268 1077423 44756 2786558 -5.68 2.958 � ♦itt�lR�i�l�t�ititt4tY�Wt�t�i4tt�tMit�i�tiitltttVttl��t�tliM1it��ttliM1t«�Ytltit�t��F�titt�iFiitt}��tO4tw�tt�fiVY�t�V�4�Yi�Rt�t�#VYttYfY , I UNINCORPORATED �� 977766 953305 .... 24461 286484 198523 18800 17275 40967 10919 273798 - 4.43 3.482 - r � s � s � s l� sarkx � s ar��xrsw�sa�s�+s�a��++�rsastus��at�aswr�searias�rt��x�� rs» � ars � sarrs � i � . �� rss � as � »rx � rwxaa � +ssrs �� aresy« � as � + � r �� . � �it<�R!lt�itft�tlt4rt�lYkA��tYM1t�rY4ttkMlttt4ttstitirt{titM�t�Yi<t�tilitrkktti�ktitiii��lt��itt��#itYi�i..ittl�kYtttittiitttttitYi/��ttf♦ . COUNTY TOTAL 9369848 9196612 173236 3240879 1569438 211833 285543 1118390 55675 3060356 5 3.005 I � ` t .