The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About05-09-95 PLANNING COMMISSION � .. :+�, i1F AGENDA - LYNWOOD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - 7:30 P.M. City Hall Council Chambers l �� 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, CA R� EIV E CITY OF LYNWOOU May 9, 1995 � CITY CIERKS OF�ICE MAY 41995 Atl PY - Carlton r�cr�il�er 7�8�9�11�11�1'1�1�2�3�4�l5�6 Chairperson � , ! . �� Errick Lee Donald Dove � Vice Chairman Commissioner �. Eloise Evans John Haynes Commissioner Commissioner Jama1 Muhsin Commissioner C O M M I S S I O N C O U N S E L: Michele Beal Bagneris • Interim Deputy City Attorney STAFF: Gary Chicots_, Director Robert Diplock Community Development Department Planrring Manager Art Barfield Louis Omoruyi Associate Planner Associate Planner Louis E. Morales, Jr. Paul Nguyen Associate Planner Civil Engineer Assoc. f:\upfiles\may95 . � � - . 1 � _ �� May 9, 1995 OPENIN(3 CEREMON2E8 1. Call meeting to order. 2. Flag salute. , 3. Roll call of Commissioners. . 4. Certification of Agenda Posting. 5. Approval and signing of minutes for the F�bruary 14, 1995 Planninq Commission meeting. - CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: � 1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. CUP 95-02 Applicant: KV Properties PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use � Permit in order to develop a 33,000 sq. ft. market and 33,970 sq. ft. of additional retail and restaurant space at 10721 So. Atlantic Avenue (former Lucky Market site), in the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone. RECOMMENDED ACTION: " Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planninq�Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2543: 1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No, 95-02, will not have a significant effect on the environment and . certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate. 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 95-02, subject to I ` the stated conditions and requirements. ' 2. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP CASE N0. TPM 95-04 Applicant: KV Properties PROPOSAL: � The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map i No. 24301 '(Case No. TPM 95-04) for the purpose of vacating '- portions of an existing alley that bisects the property, and i to consolidate four (4) lots bounded by Abbott Road, Atlantic � • Avenue, Pendleton Street and Lugo Elementary School to achieve � ,. the desired site area to accommodate a proposed � commercial/retail development at 10721 So. Atlantic Avenue, in � the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone. I RECOMMENDED ACTION: � Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the ; Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2544: 1. Certifying that project will no't" have a significant j effect on the environment and that a Negative Declaration has been issued pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and State CEQA .. . Guidelines. i 2. Approving Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 95-04 subject to I the stated conditions and requlrements. i - i , i 2 . , I _ f . , f 4 � 3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. CUP'•95-03 Applicant: Maria DeJesus Llamas PROPOSAL: Tkie applicant is requesting a modification of Conditional Use Permit Case No, 82046 to permit auto electric repair where the preyious use permit allowed the sale of parts and supplies _ only at 12001 Long Beach Boulevard, in the C-2A (Medium Commercial) zone. � RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the Planning Commission continue this hearing until the applicant submits a complete application and resolves her conflict with � the property owner. 4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. CUP 95-04 Applicant: St. Francis Medical Center PROPOSAL: The applicant is requestinq approval of a Conditional Use Permit,to construct an 8 plus hospital tower with single bed rooms housing acute care patients on the medical center campus located at 3630 Imperial Highway, in the H-M-D (Hospital, ,. ' Medical & Dental) zone. The proposed structure will replace the existing hospital and reduce the number of licensed patient beds from 478 to 350. � `. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2542: , 1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit Case No. 95-04 will not have a significant effect on the environment and certifying the Negative Declaration as complete. 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit Case No. 95-04, subject � to the stated conditions and xequirements. � 5. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CASE NO. GPA.95-01 j Applicant: KRS Development Corporation ! , PROPOSAL• ' I � The applicant is requesting approval of a General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan designation from ; Commercial to Residential for approximately one acre of land I on the north side of Redwood Avenue between State Street and � Peach Street in order to develop single-family housing. This ' application was continued by the Planning Commission to the � May 9, 1995 meeting to allow the applicant the opportunity to + meet with the community which had questions on the proposed . ; ' amendment. - � RECOMMENDED ACTION: ; i Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the � Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2545: � 1. Certifying that the project will not have a � significant effect ori the environment and that a Negative Declaration has been issued pursuant to ; the provisions of the California Environmental ' Quality Act and State CEQA Guidelinea. � 3 'i i � � i i , I `�� , � 2. Approving General Plan Amendment 95-01 and ' recommending City Council adoption of the General PTan Amendment. • NEW PUBLIC HEARZNG: 6. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE N0. CUP�95-06 Applicant: Feliciano Ramos PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to sell beer and wine for on-site consumption in an . existing seafood restaurant at 11098 Atlantic Avenue in the C- 3 (Heavy Commercial) zone. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff respectfully requests that after. consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2548: 1. Finding that Conditional Use Permit Case No. 95-06 is categorically exempt from provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. ± 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 95-06, subject to � the stated conditions and requirements. "l. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. CUP�95-07 Applicant: Henry Oh PROPOSAL: : � i The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use , �, Permit in order to develop four (.4) residential dwelling units, with an attached two (2) car garage for each unit at 11827,Wright Road, in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone. RECOMMENDED ACTION: , Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the j Planning Commission adopts the attached Resolution No. 2547: i ( 1. Certifying that the project is Categorically Exempt from I the provisions of the California Environmental 4uality Act per State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061b(3). i 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit Case No. 95-07, subject � to the stated conditions and requirements. � I ' 8. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CASE NO. GPA'95-02 � � ' Applicant: City of Lynwood � � I PROPOSAL: , I I The City of Lynwood is requesting approval of a General Plan � Amendment to change the General Plan Designation. from � , Townhouse and Cluster Housing to Public Facility for a parcel � of approximately 33,000 sq. ft. on the southwest corner of the _� intersection of Birch Street and Mulford Avenue in order to � permit the replacement of an existing youth center with a new .. � and expanded facility. � . � I .i , 4 � . i I _ j �� .c�rv. . . . . . . � � RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff'respect requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2550: 1.' Certifying'that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Negative Declaration , has been issued pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act _and State CEQA � Guidelines. 2._ Approving General Plan Amendment 95-02 and recommending . City Council adoption of the General Plan Amendment. 9. ZONE CHANGE CASE NO. ZC 95-01 Applicant: City of Lynwood , PROPOSAL: - ' The City of Lynwood is requesting approval of a Zone Change (ZC 95-01) to change the zoning of City owned property on the southwest corner of the intersection of Birch Street and Mulford Avenue (11405-09 Birch Street) from R-3 (Multiple Family) to CF (Community Facility) in order to permit the ' replacement of an existinq youth center with a new and expanded facility. � RECOMMENDED ACTION: - t , Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the �,. Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2551: €� 1. Certifying that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Negative Declaration has been. issued pursuant tq the provisions of the California Environmental Act and State CEQA Guidelines. 2. Approving Zone Change 95-01 and recommending City Council ' approval of the Zone Change. REGULAR ORDER OF HUSINESB: . NONE COMMENTS• PUBLIC ORALS ' COMMISSION ORALS STAFF ORALS ADJOURNMENT , Adjourn to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission'on June 13, 1995 at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall Council Chambers, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California. .. I . i f:\upPi.les\misc\may95 � '� , I , i 5 I - ,' ! %:..__:. b � , LYNWOOD PLANNING COMMZSSION FEBRUARY 14 1995 The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood met in a Regular , Session in the City Ha11,,11330 Bullis Road, on the above date at 7:30 p.m. Chairman McMiller presiding. Commissioners Lee, Evans, Muhsin, Dove, Murphy, Haynes and McMiller answered the roll call. Also present were Planning Manager Diplock, Deputy City Attorney Bagneris, Associate Planner Morales and Civil Engineering Associate Nguyen. Planning Manager Diplock stated the Agenda had been duly posted in accordance with The Brown Act. It was then moved by Commissioner Lee, seconded,by Commissioner Evans and carried to approve the following minutes as amended by the Deputy City Attorney: a) October 11, 1994 b) November S, 1994 c) December 13, 1994 d) January 10, 1995 CONTZNUED PUSLIC HEARINGS Chairman McMiller introduced the first Public Hearing, Variance Case No. VAR 34, Applicant: Manuel Simental, and called for a staff report. Planning Manager Diplock stated the applicant is requesting a variance from provisions of the Zoning Ordinance in order to reduce the required number of parking spaces for a proposed � restaurant at 10320 Long Beach Blvd. This case was continued from the January 10, 1995 Planning Commission meeting in order to � allow the applicant to redesign his project to more effectively ! meet required parking. Also, the applicant has attempted to ; ;�acquire vacant property to the north for additional parkinq I � space. At this time, staff is recommending approval of the variance. � Commissioner Lee stated concerns with current traffic andlparkinq I I problems at the site. � Commissioner Evans also stated concerns with current traffic problems in that immediate area. Commissioner Murphy questioned the square footage designated for ! the outdoor seating area. � ' � i Chairman McMiller opened the Public Hearing on Variance Case No. VAR34. � Manuel Simental/Business Owner, 3347 Cherokee Avenue, South Gate spoke in favor of the Variance. I Chairman McMiller questioned the applicants attempts to lease the property north of the site, and the status. Mr. Simental, Applicant stated the property owner would only � discuss leasing the property if Mr. Simental could obtain the proper permits from the city to open the new business. Planning Manager Diplock suggested that the Commission could approve the Variance with an additional condition, that the � variance only take effect after the applicant secures additional ° parking spaces. i Commissioner Lee questioned the large area utilized by outdoor i dining and discussed the Commissions requests for revisions. ! � � i — i J , Gabriel Delgado, 3320 Minnesota Ave., South Gate, Architect, reviewed the site revisions with the Commission. The Commission continued discussion relative to parking and the outdoor dining area. Chairman McMiller suggested continuing the item. Commissioner Lee discussed the need to redesign the project. Commissioner Muhsin concurred with staffs suggestion to approve the variance with conditions for additional parking. It was moved by Commissioner Lee, seconded by Commissioner Evans to continue the item to the next regular scheduled meeting in order to allow the applicant the opportunity to pursue the options recommended by the Commission. ROI.I. CALL • AYES: . 001�4IISSIONER DOVE, EVANS, LEE, MUHSIN, MURPHY, McMILLER NOES: COI�SZSSIONER HAYNES ASSENT: NONE Chairman McMiller then introduced the negt item on the agenda, Appeal of Site Plan Review, Case No. 119, Appellant: Bruce Yingline, and called for a staff report. Planning Manager Diplock stated the appellant is appealing the actions of the Site Plan Review Committee to allow the operation of a concrete and green waste recycling center at 11655 Louise Street. Several residents have filed complaints with regard to the noise and dust levels created by the business. However, at this time, staff is requesting, after consideration, the ;Commission deny this appeal and affirm the actions of the Site Plan Review Committee approving this project with appropriate conditions. Commissioner Murphy discussed the concerns of the neighboring business regarding the dust levels. He also stated that he is not in favor of a new business that would cause a hardship on existing businesses. � Chairman McMiller questioned the truck traffic on the narrow street and whether. or not this has been taken into consideration.. � Planning Manager Diplock stated that one of the Conditions of Approval imposed by the Site Plan Review Committee is that the owner pave the area surrounding the entrance/egit and loading area. Commissioner Lee stated concerns with the parking conditions ; during the pavinq process. He also stated concerns with noise. Chairman McMiller opened the Public Hearing. Bruce Yingling 11618 Louise Avenue, Appellant, discussed Code Enforcement violations at the site, truck traffic and the illegal trailers parked along the streeto ' I Ramon Cortez 11651 Louise, spoke in favor of the appeal. Sergio Lopez 9602 Adoree Street, Downey, and owner of the ' business spoke in opposition to the Appeal. He discussed basic day to'day operations of his business. , Commissioner Lee questioned the requirement to construct of a brick wall, and requested the exact location of the wall be clearly indicated .in the conditions of approval. Also, he questioned whether or not the owner is willing to provide ; additional landscaping. + � . Mr. Lopez agreed to all conditions set forth by the Commission and the Site Plan Review Committee. Commissioner Lee requested a condition be added, requiring review of the business in six months to determine if all conditions are I being complied with. Hearing no further discussion, Chairman McMiller closed the Public Hearing. It was then moved by Commissioner Lee, seconded by Commissioner Haynes to deny the appeal and affirm the actions of the Site Plan , Review Committee and amend the conditions as stated by the Commission. ROLL CALL• . AYES: • COMMZSSIONER DOVE� EVANS, HAYNES, LEE, MUHSIN, MCMILLER NOES: COMMISSIONER MURPHY ABSENT: NONE Chairman McMiller then introduced the next item, Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 157, Applicant: Alexander Santos, and called for a staff report. i Planning Manager Diplock stated the applicant is requesting l approval of a Conditional Use Permit to convert an existing single family dwelling into a duplex with an existing detached four car garage at 3200 E1 Segundo Blvd. Chairman McMiller opened the Public Aearing. Alexander Santos 1921 E. 130th Street, Compton, stated he is the . property owner and spoke in favor of CUP #157. He informed the :Commission that he would be doing all the repair work and ,:construction himself and questioned the condition that all work " be done by a licensed contractor. Staff and the Commission discussed the need for using licensed contractors when plumbing and electrical work was being done, and the case where the owner/builder is allowed to do the construction. Hearing no further discussion, Chairman McMiller c.losed the Public Hearing. It was then moved by Commissioner Murphy, seconded by Commissioner Lee and unanimously carried to approve Conditional, Use Permit Case No. 157.with conditions as recommended by staff. ; Chairman McMiller then introduced the neat item, 2oning Ordinance � Amendment No. 39, and called for a staff report. Planning Manager Diplock stated the Applicant Mr. Chae, wishes to , establish a liquor store within the Marketplace at 3100 E. Imperial Highway, in the CB-1 zone. The Zoning Ordinance specifically prohibits off-sale liquor outlets within a multi- � tenant retail center. Therefore, before any approval can be i given, the zoning ordinance would require an amendment eliminatinq that prohibition. Staff is recommending denial of � the amendment, feeling the original intent of the ordinance was more correct. Also noted in the staff report is the Sheriffs recommendation for denial. At this time, commissioner Lee was excused from the meeting. Chairman McMiller opened the Public Hearing. Jay L. Jackson, 16161 Norhall Street, North Hills, representative and sub-contractor for the project consultant, spoke in favor of ' the Zoning Ordinance Amendment and clarified for the Commission that the applicant is only seeking approval for a beer and wine license. There is no request for liquor. , 3 � Commissioner Evans questioned the need for the sale of beer and wine at this location" and spoke in opposition to the Zoning Amendment. Hearing no further discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Haynes, seconded by Commissioner Evans to deny Zoning ordinance Amendment Case No. ZOA39. ROLL CALL• AYES: . COA4QISSIONER EVANS, HAYNES, MUHSIN, MURPHY, McMILLER NOES: NONE ASSENT: COI�II+IISSIONER LEE . ' ABSTAZN: COMMISSIONER DOVE Chairman McMiller then introduced and opened a Public Hearing on Modification of Conditional Use Permit Case No. CUP31M and Conditional Use Permit Case No. CUP 144. The modification of CUP 31 was necessary to eliminate the specific restriction on the sale of beer and wine at the Marketplace. CUP No. 144 is the use permit required in order to establish off site beer and wine sales. Since the Commission denied the previous amendment to the Zoning ordinance which would have permitted the sale of beer and wine in a multi-tenant retail center, these CUP actions cannot be approved. Jay L. Jackson 16161 Norhall Street, spoke in favor of the CUP and the modification of CUP 31. Hearing no further discussion Chairman McMiller closed the Public Hearing. It was then moved by Commissioner Murphy, seconded by Commissioner Haynes to deny the modification of CUP 31, and the modification of CUP 31. " ROIS, CALL • AYES: • C01�4[ISSIONER DOVE, EVANS, HAYNES� MUHSIN, MURPHY� McMILLER NOES: NONS ABSENT: COM�tISSIONER LEB I PUBLIC ORAI,S � Jay L. Jackson 16161 Norhall St. discussed possible conditions on j the concrete recycling center. i At this time, Commissioner_Lee returned to the meeting. i COI�II�IISSION ORALS t Commissioner pove discussed City economic development, and the programs and the status of the former bowling alley and i commercial property on Martin Luther Ring Jr. Blvd. Commissioner Murphy verbally submitted his resignation to take � effect following the March meeting. Commended the Habitat House � recently constructed in the City. Commissioner Evans discussed concerns with the property at i Magnolia and School Street. Also discussed the possibility of a joint meeting with the City Council. � Commissioner Haynes discussed ongoing problems with the Marketplace. I Commissioner Muhsin wished everyone a Happy Valentines Day. Commissioner Lee discussed the project at Fernwood and Bullis Road, questioned thestatus of the Commissions six month review of ' the Watts Health Foundation project, and supported Commissioner i Evans request for a joint meeting with the City Council. � 4 � I Chairman McMiller discussed the illegal dumping at the empty lot on the corner of Weber and Santa Fe. Hearing no further discussion, Commission adjourned to the next regular scheduled meeting of March 14, 1995. CHAIRMAN McMILLER APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ROBERT DIPLOCK, PLANNING MANAGER APPROVED AS TO FORM: � MICHELE BEAL BAGNERIS DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY I I ; `h t `' �"�i I�� ITEM 1`�Oa_� DATE: Mdy 9, 1995 _ . T0: PLANNING COMMISSION �r�\'� �O. � FROM: Gary Chicots, Director Community Development Departmen�� SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 95-02 ' Applicant: K.V. Properties Proposal• , � The applicant is requesting approval of . a Conditional Use Permit in order to develop_a 33,000 sq. ft. market and 33,970 sq, ft. of additional retail and restaurant space at 10721 S. Atlantic Avenue (former Lucky Market site), in the C-3 (Heavy Commercialj zone . Facts: I � 1. Source of Authoritv ° � � � Section 25-32.1.5 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that all new commercial development'in the City of Lynwood obtain ' approval of a Conditional Use Permit from the Planning Division. 2. Propertv Location . The project is located at the southwest corner of Atlantic Avenue and Abbott Road (see attached Location Map). 3. Prooertv Size ' . The subject property is irregu,lar in shape and is approximately 180,172 sq. ft. or 4.1 acres. 4. Existinq Land Use , The surrounding land uses are as follows: General Plan Zoning North - Commercial North - C-3 ' South - Commercial South - C-3 East - Commercial East - C-3 West - Public Facility West - R-1 ' S. Project Characteristics ' The applicant proposes to develop a neighborhood shopping center on the former Lucky Market site. The center would : consist of a market of approximately 33,000 sq. ft. and 33,970 sq. ft. of additional retail which will include a 5,000 sq. ft. restaurant. � The development will have 189 on-site parking spaces and will have landscaping throughout the parking area. The project will � be developed in two phases with the first phase to include construction of the market. The project upon completion of � both phases shall require 301 parking spaces. The applicant will meet the parking requirement by parking on property located within three hundred feet of the project that the Redevelopment Agency is scheduled to purchase. " 6. Site Plan Review At its regular meeting on April 26, 1995 the Site Plan Review - Committee evaluated the proposed development and recommended approval to the Planning Commission, subject to specific 1 , �4 � e conditions and requirements. 7. Zoninq Enforcement History • None of record at the time this report was prepared. � 8. Public Response None of.record at the time this report was prepared. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: ' 1. Consistency with General Plan The proposed land use is,consistent with the existing zoning classification (C-3) Heavy Commercial and General Plan desigfiation of Commercial. � 2. Site Suitabilitv The site is suitable to accommodate�the proposed development relative to building mass and design. 3.. ComoatibilitV ' The project is compatible with the surrounding uses and will . assist in the removal of blight in the area. , 4. Compliance with Develooment Standards The proposal meets the development standards required by the Zoning ordinance with respect to setbacks, lot coverage, �• building height and density. 5. Conditions of Approval The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. 6. Benefits to Community ' The proposal will assist in upgrading the commercial use in the area and support the commercial goals of the General Plan. 7. Environmental Assessment , The Director of Community Development has determined that no , substantial environmental impact will result from the proposed development; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been filed - in the Community Development Department and in the office of , the City Clerk. " RECOMMENDATION: • Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planninq Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2543: 1. Findinq that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 95-02, will not have a significant effect on the environment and . certifying,the Neqative Declaration as adequate. 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 95-02, subject to the stated conditions and -requirements. �� f:\wpfi4es\cup95-02.stf � � � 2 . , LOCATION NIAP : � _-.-. . � J w � � '�_ / - . . R � • � y ��. i _�� 1 �v � a o`��5�°g, ? a �� ', �C � o - . a ° � ia �� 7 m o s ,,p .� eo: n' ROAD o g �I y �„/ cs ur sa aus n T I � a�y �� n p isz f . �� `�@�ry �u� Y �iKi�� . f '+� i Q �� i \ / * +1 n�• � e N 7 s a r v o , , � 5�+� rNti4 �,8 � ; ., � so n . R f � ��(� V . a e i oao y. . �i � �iJ .N��SI;y) f N ��d i .. -- e ° .0 . . p� Ja N � � 'y NfORA 'Z ��es �� ST, o � Z L / �s � � . �' �' t � '� + ,� " ' y �l' � C ' . ��v . .rs � ti � ' arcr�� rAttl7 m d . . ` SMiCU � ¢ � lY ^ (� F � `e � � ie JQ . ,� , � ]7 ;,:IDOvo ._1._' ' t V n I �v� �� /! � � . � / �o M� y N v �' . /I . i: . , �JQ ' !/ \ L /J ,o a,�� Sfoo y3i9 �y ��y; �m O -- ro — —e y �� Y 1. q . ' II �- � . A 4 .a . . ,� � �—�.� . � PENO(E ON E; /Q;o). flwv JO aA p . �ly � ; �^��'?' ^, .5 I . . ,,�44, a p va�Y � vs�o I Na6� "s " v a,� �" • ei ' r'' q�30� � � T � �r � . l��d n � � ^ � . • . _ � r I � � r�i � Of11� N V � /of�) �. ;o53d• I , (jt ,t . ' � � � �� 6 - .4?. 1 R � t,t ' . �� f��SY?, J � . „ � � . , � o �f+ �° ' _� � � � io .� i�ssa °'°�is " tR �,G iD�� ' V � �I� �� _' ioiN ,� 3 . i94ot a 1, . . .v � , oy�� o..� 8 '�r % NE�� , �� h v . •. /o5i�/ .j� � � -c�F�. �n ryI ,�,� ; r -�tst �'?' ,� R3 '� ^ � '� r po � � � K � w i0 I 'r�aQ , �w914•�'y331. yaY,f �\ .. ii.w �.w y� 9.3 r y � . . �_'� _ --- H/GHH11Y � -- ,..��,�, � u . " --�_ C A S E N 0. �- �� ;_��. = �� _ c � t � �'� �'�- �� , RESOLUTION N0. 2543 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING ` COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 95-02 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MARKET AND ADDITIONAL RETAIL SPACE� - AT 1'0721 ATLANTIC AVENUE IN THE C-3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL) ZONE WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, on May o9, 1995 conducCed a public hearing on the subject application; - and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission �onsidered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined 'that the proposal will not have a negative effect on the _ environment, and therefore has prepared a Negative Declaration for - the project; and WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for development of a new commercial use in an area designated as Commercial under the General Plan and in a C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone. Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and ,determines as follows: - A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and . shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the official Zoning Ordinance. . ' B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding properties or interfere with o� endanger the public, health, safety, or welfare. C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current zoning regulations and site plan submitted and reviewed by the , Site Plan Review Committee. D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not , adversely affect the General Plan. E. The proposed development will aid in upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in fostering other quality commercial developments. Section 2. The Planning Commiss'ion of the City of Lynwood, based upon'the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 95-02, provided the ., following conditions are observed and complied with at all times. �' COMMiJNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT General . 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the IIniform Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon shall be first reported to the Community Development Department, Redevelopment Division, for review. 1 3. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she h�s read, understands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance of any building permits. REDEVELOPMENT DIVISION 4. The project design shall provide for access and circulation of vehicular, pedestrian, and emergency vehicle traffic in a safe, logical and efficient manner, both to the site (off- site) and within the site (on-site). , 5. The proposed design shall be compatible with existing developments in the area in terms of.scale, height, bu1k, materials, colors, and the preservation of privacy. _ 6. The main entrance to the primary building shall provide for ,, independent access to the physically impaired. - 7. The street address shall be displayed in a prominent location � ' on the street side of the building. All address numbers shall , be easily visible to vehicular and/or pedestrian traffic. The , street address and room numbers shall be no less than four (4) inches in height and shall be of a eolor contrasting to the - background to which they are attached. 8. On-site lighting shall be installed along all vehicular access � � ways and major walkways. Such lighting shall be directed onto the driveways and walkways within the development and away from adjacent properties. 9. The parking aisle width shall be twenty-five (25') feet. 10. Bxits from parking lot shall be clearly posted with stop signs. �1. Cart return areas, if applicable, must be provided and shown � on_the site plan. 12. All landscaped areas shall be landscaped with a mixture of .. ground cover, shrubs and trees, and may include decorate rock, sculpture, and walkways within the major parkinq area. 13. Within the main parking area, one (1) tree shall provided for each ten (10) parking spaces. The trees shall be of a species that provides a broad canopy. . 14. All required landscaping materials shall be not less than the - following sizes: o Trees - at least fifteen gallon o Shrubs - at least five gallon o Grounds cover - lawn shall be of sod and shall cover the proposed area. 15. No sign shall be erected without a.sign permit. The Director or his designee shall issue the sign permit upon approval by ' . the.Planning and Redevelopment Divisions. 16. Only individual illuminated channel letters shall be permitted. 17. Uses within seventy-five (75') feet of fronting on a major • ' street shall have monument identification signs. 18. Billboard signs are prohibited. 2 - , . 19. There shall be periodic review of the applicant's compliance with all of the requirements, at a time specified by the Director, but in no event longer than 12 months. 20. The applicant or his/her successor in interest shall provide evidence of qood-faith compliance with all of the requirements at the time of said review. 21. If, at the end of the time period established by the Director or his/her designee, the applicant. or his/her successor in interest has failed to comply with �all of the requirements, the Director or his/her designee, shail notify the Planning Commission of his/her findings and recommend such action as deemed appropriate, according to the Lynwood Municipal Code. PLANNING DIVISION ' 22. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving the proposed development. 23. Construction shall commence with six (6) months from date of issuance of building permits. 24. This permit shall become void one hundred twenty (120) days, unless extended, after the uses permitted have been abandoned or have ceased to be actively exercised. Landscapinq 25. The applicant is required to submit a landscape plan drawn by a licensed landscape architect to t}�e satisfaction of the Director of Community Development prior to any building permit being issued. 26. The amount of landscaping required shall be provided and consistent with the proposed landscape plan.' 27. All existing mature trees and other significant vegetation ' should be preserved and integrated into the landscape.plan to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director or his/her designee. 28. All landscaping shall be permanently maintained. Lawn and ground covers are to be trimmed or mowed regularly, with all planted areas kept free of weeds.and debris. All plantings , are to be kept in a healthy and growing condition. An automatic sprinkler or irrigation system shall be provided and , maintained in working condition. 29: Where vehicles are to be parked immediafely adjacent to a public or private street or alley, a decorative masonry wall ' a maximum of thirty-six inches in height measured from the finished surface of the parkinq.area, shall be provided. There must be minimum landscaping'•to screen the wall from street view and accessibility. 30. Prior to the installation or construction of any fence or , masonry wall within any zone, the property owner shall obtain a permit and submit the following information to the Planning Division of the Community Development Department: ' a. A simple plot plan showing the location of fence or masonry wall in relation to the property lines,"heights, proposed materials, and openings or gates to provide access for vehicles and pedestrians. b. For masonry walls a building permit shall be applied for upon approval of the plot plan described above. All masonry walls of any height shall meet the requirements . 3 - , . for masonry construction as defined in Chapter 24 of the Uniform Building Code. A fee based on the valuation of the proposed construction sha11 be paid to the Building Division. 31. All fences or masonry walls shall be required to maintain adequate pedestrian access for the purpose of safety and convenience. A thirty-'six (36) inch or three foot clear gate or opening shall be provided to all enclosures for pedestrian and wheelchair access. Pedestrian and vehicula,r access shall be provided. ' 32. All fences or masonry walls shall be required to be installed with a finished, esthetically pleasing side facing out toward adjacent properties or the public right-of-way to the satisfaction of the oirector of Community Development or his/her designee. 33. A eight (8) foot high decorative block wall shall be installed along the perimeter of the property to the west of the , property line abutting the existing Elementary school to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development or his/her designee. 34. The applicant must provide a trash enclosure consistent with the materials and color of the main buildinq(s) on the site of the subject property. The trash enclosure shall be provided with gates and built as per Building and Safety Division standards. . PARKING 35. Parking shall be a minimum of 189 stalls for customer parking only and maintained on-site for Phase I. An additional one . hundred twelve (112) parking spaces will be required for�the. entire project upon completion of all phases. Such additional parking may located within three hundred feet of the project. 36. Each off-street parking space shall not be less than twenty (20) feet in length and nine (9) feet in width, exclusive of : access driveways or aisles, except'.as noted below: a. Any standard parking space that is immediately adjacent ' to a wall, structural column, light standards, or similar obstruction on one or both of its longer sides or in an . enclosed space shall be at least ten (10') feet in width and twenty (20') feet in length. b. At a minimum, two parking spaces designed for the handicapped shall be provided. These spaces may be provided as follows: 1. Dimensions. The minimum dimensions of each automobile parking stall for the handicapped shall • be not less than fourteen (14) feet in width by ' twenty (20) feet in length. Said stalls shall be ' lined to provide a nine (9) foot parking area and a five (5) foot loading and unload�ing area or; 2. Two (2) spaces may be provided within a twenty-three' (23) foot wide area, lined to provide a nine (9) foot parking area on each side of a five (5) foot _ loadinq 'and unloading area. The minimum length of , each parking space shall be twenty (2) feet. 3. Location. All parking spaces for the handicapped s6a11 be located,adjacent to the main entrance of the facility for which the spaces are provided. The parking spaces shall be positioned so that the handicapped persons shall not be required to walk or 4 . . . � ? wheel behind parked vehicles. � 37. The applicant shall submit elevation drawings to the Planning - Division showing the exterior building design including the specification of colors and materials. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the design of the subject building including color and materials, must be approved by the Director of Community Development. 38. Prior. to the installation, display, enlarging, modifying, relocating or changing of signs, a permit must be obtained from the Department of Community Development, Planning Dlvision. 39. Central heating, cooling ventilation equipment, swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical devices shall be screened from public view. Such equipment shall be screened from surrounding properties and streets and operated so that they do not disturb the peace, quite and comfort of neighboring residents, in accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance. All means of access to the referenced equipment . shall be designed and installed so as to prevent access to unauthori2ed persons and shall be approved by the Building'and Safety Division. 40. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally ' compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent buildings. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc. shall be installed without the prior written approval of the Director of Community Development and�required building , permits as per plan. 41. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 1319, to insure variation and esthetically pleasing color schemes for buildings in Redevelopment Areas along Atlantic Avenue the exterior of any building or structure shall be painted with.a color within a range of colors approved by the Community Development • Director. 42. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in a sanitary condition pending construction and shall be � • maintained in a neaf and orderly :�anner at all times. Failure to comply may result in revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. 43. Maintenance of sidewalk, parking area, gutters and any surrounding area will be done a minimum of twice a day (before starting operations and before closing). 44.� A cover sheet of approved Conditions�must be attached to plans �prior to submission to the Building and Safety Division. 45. Any violation of said conditions in this resolution may result in revocation or modification of the Conditional Use Permit by the issuing body at a regularly scheduled meeting. 46. Entity/Agency will maintain a pro-active approach to the elimination of graffiti from any structure, fences or , accessory building at the site. Daily inspections will - conducted in order to have all graffiti removed by 12:00 p.m. ' 47. Parking area will be maintained at all•times either by the agent/owner employees or a commercial parking cleaninq _ company. , . 48. Entity/Agency will not allow/authorize any other uses except . those listed on the business license and as noted in the permitted uses section of the Disposition and Development , Agreement ("DDA") for the project. <. 5 ' � , 49. All entries to the parking lot area will be posted in accordance with Section 22658 of the California Vehicle Code. . PUBLIC WORKS 50. Submission and recordation a parcel map or tract map is required. Building permits will not be issued prior to the . recordation of a subdivision map. 51. Dedicate required property at northwest corner of Pendleton Aventie and Atlantic Avenue to accommodate corner cut-off. 52. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered ' Civil Engineer. Grading plan will be checked by Public Works Department. �IO building permits will be issued prior to the approval of gradinq plan by City Engineer. 53. Construct new sidewalk along Abbott Road. � 54,: Reconstruct damaged sidewalk, curb and gutters along Pendleton Avenue, Atlantic Avenue and Abbott Road. 55. Construct 24' wide gutter and asphalt pavement along property frontage along Abbott Road. ,: 56. Construct a new drive approach per City standards. 57: Close existing drive approaches and construct proposed four (4) drive approaches. 58. Construct eight (8) caheelchair ramps at various locations around site. ' 59. Construct five (5� foot wide planter;to separate the sidewalks from the parking lots. �, 60. Connect to public sewer. E,,_i: "uilding shall be connected separately. Construct later.�!., �:; necessary. 61. Install four (40) 24' box st:_ - ^rees per APWA standard alonq . � Abbott Road, Atlantic Avenc_ i,andleton Avenue. ' Species to be determined by :.:::::c :;orks. A permit to install the trees is required by tti�• ::r.qineering Division. Exact locations of the trees wi11 ce _letermined at the time the permit is is,sued. 62. Construct tree well covers per City of Lynwood standards,for existing and proposed street �rees. 63. Regrade parkway and landscape ::ith grass. 64. , Provide and install six (6) narbelite street pole with liyht " fixture, underground services and conduits on Abbott Road s Pendleton Avenue: 65. Underground all utilities. ' 66. All Edison vaults and structures shall be placed underground. 67. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all off-site iPnprovements. 68. All required water,meters, meter service changes and/or fire ' protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the - developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any , � � 410L'}C. �� 6 .. w ..... . . S.. 69. Apply for alley vacation and pay for all vacation cost or vacate as part of parcel or tract map. 70. Abandon water line and qas line in alley. 71. Remove all weeds from sidewalks, drive approaches and curb and � gutter. 72. Relocate, at developers expense, any utilities out of the • alley proposed to be vacated. FIRE DEPARTMENT 73. Provide off-site hydrant (main size to be determined at a later date). 74. Fire Department connections to be removed from the building (can be placed in planter area). • 75. Designated fire lane curb to be painted (red) and marked as fire lane. 76. Parapet around the building to be included in sprinkler system. Section 3. A copy of Resolution No. 2543 sha11 be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED and ADOPTED this the day of , , 1995, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: ' AYES: - NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN:' Carlton McMiller, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ' •, Gary Chicots, Director Michele Beal Bagneris, Community.Development Dept. Interim Deputy City Attorney �. f:\upfiles\cup95=02.res � � ' 7 ; i I �1�' Fi�ti . � DATE: May 9, 1995 A��,��pA 1TE,'� N0 , z TO: PLANNING COMMISSION � C�S 0. • d� FROM: Gary Chicots, Director Community Development Department BY: Robert Diplock, Planning Manger SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP CASE NO. TPM 95-04 Applicant: K.V. Properties. . PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 24301 (Case`No. TPM 95-04) for the purpose of vacating portions of an existing al,ley that bisects the property, and to consolidate four (4) lots bounded by Abbott Road, Atlantic Avenue, Pendleton Street and Lugo Elementary School to achieve the desired site area to accommodate a proposed commercial/retail . development at 10721 S. Atlantic Avenue, in the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone. FACTS 1. Source of Authorit Section 25-18, et seq., Subdivision Regulations of the , Lynwood Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act, Government Code Section 66410, et seq require that a Parcel Map be recorded for the_subdivision or consolidation of parcels. 2. Propertv Location. � The property is located between Pendleton and Abbott Road Avenues, on the west side of Atlantic Avenue, and is ` approximately' four (4) acres in size. (See attached location mapj. 3. Existinq Land Use The parcels are vacant. The uses surrounding the parcels consist of the following: • North - Commercial South - Commercial - I . , East - Commercial ' � West - School � 4., General Plan Desianation � i The General Plan designation for the property is Commercial. � The surrounding land use desi�gnations and zoninq ; classifications are as fo2lows: General Plan - Zoning ; North - Commercial C-3 � i " South - Commercial C-3 � i East - Commercial C-3 i West - Commercial' C-3/Pl/R-2 � tpm9504 . . . �' i � , 1 i � � � � � � � f wr. .,,`. . . 5. Proiect Characteristics - The applicant proposes to combine four (4) lots and portions of a proposed vacated alley into•,one parcel on a vacant plot of land. The consolidated lot will be approximately four (4) acres in size. The proposed consolidation would ' allow for the development of a 33,800 sq. ft. market and _' 33,970 sq. ft. of retail space which will include a restaurant. 6. Site Plan Review At its regular meeting on April 26, 1995, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed lot consolidation , and recommended approval to the PZanning Commission, subject to specific conditions and requirements. ' ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION 1. Confiauration of the Proposed Subdivision a. The design of the proposed consolidation shows the proposed lot to be in character with existing commercial/retail development in the area. b. The proposal is intended to combine four (4) lots into one (1) parcel in order to allbw better utilization of the property and development of the site. c. The site.is physically suitable for consolidation and commercial/retail development. 2. Consistency with the General Plan a. Staff's inspection shows that the proposed consolidation will permit future development compatible with the General Plan. b. The size and location of the proposed consolidation will not siqnificantly impact the environment. c. The proposed consolidation is consistent with the i Economic Development and Land Use goals and policies of the General Plan. - I Environmental Assessment �� The Community Development Department has determined that no � i substantial environmental impact will �result from the proposed project," pursuant the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines.' � Therefore, a Negative Declaration"has been prepared and is on j file in the Community Development Department and the office of ' the City Clerk. � � RECOMMENDATION(S): i Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the I Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2544: ' 1. Certifying that project will not have a significant i effect on the environment and that a Negative Declaration has been issued pursuant to the provisions of the State � CEQA Guidelines. � � I 2. Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 2430T Case No. 95-04 ' subject to the stated conditions and requirements. . Attach�aents: 1. Location Map � 2. Resolution No. 2544 , ; 3. Site Plan . 2 • t , i � i � 1 __ . ---. __..... --- - .. . �,: ----- ------- LOCATION MAP i � : �----- _ Z � • � ' � � /S / y f J e ' �' � a / �' a� � =� ��S �° �I'e i Z ii �z i� ii � ' . � ,, � � - $ � ' � � � � � � y � Z � o a i a � p b S , � � io. �\ 7 . . . 0 0 `� ie �� ROAD o , . v �� sa are . si � �/ � Y� r��r li ��s siu � , y y �.,,�; � is�ot s�.a + � �, o � ;� „ g i . �S 8 • z. � '{ , ti � K',S� .ee� � � . Q A�. , � V l'� v ;or �� ✓� I ° � 1 7! . 1 C1 N� �� i� ((�� J �3 J ' l � �� I� 30'� � l �."" �� ' i / � �,� I�e . so y � S na . � f ry (� t t i v�o � . Y�J a • ��t�^�. � . � i �.1 0 '!t i � e No I y � Jo „ � � Q L - � '� NfORA' - Z '�,. �� .�o i �� SL o 0 � p,s 1 ' L I �`. e '� �{ �� :'�/Z"r�vp,rir$„ � , s � r" �� s �'' �e .. y V �ot .�' a � � x , ,• d : a 3a . y • a/ ° ^ l I � * (� � ,F � Q / J � � !0 ' � � � „ �ao�o . _1_. , J � � y � ^� e �: �, " . . � � v � �? 1 � �� u • ,w ID 40 � �yl � I . I � � � V . . � � r " �� ; y�o � ��CZ /S � � a +8 � 4si9 � l�vi,� �° O -- ro- p - , y346 �• � �v.� '' o .R � f�� v .,o � . � n N . � �, • ; �� oa a v�� .o ao o.e p u1 � �� ' ~ A �_. y ..5 �'ENOLf ON £ �, 7 m y �� Y j as '' � ^ � 4ia 4 en vsvol �f36� '' asai �'' � u . . n `9�1.5 H�3o� � $� � a � ro t � '. ! 09d —`� n � ^ o . �0 . � . � J � : y I � �I . � w ' /o�es 10N'/1/ !I I 'o53d� �.I .� ' .�/ot � . � �2' . .. . �� J e A_ _ge 8� h��„ O - - � �; o �ys � r � � ��v ,io :' '+� .e .. . 1 . � -�iur.. h '^ m_ � ,n - � i �� —�� : ��s . - p ,� . " G ' ' ° f pP ; -s=� I i o ,1 .< . l o �o;KCr ;,,r �_�� t3 8 iafor+ M pf� � 09�� !� o aes �,e��; �EL� w --� � N y� ;{ , �� ; a/oSi � Y � Q �.3� 9 1 ,� , I N ' / �F� �I`� I 7, � /� � � i IoS %O � y�]� YJ�7�. � h .� �059 .ir' � w � '�.. ..,. •�, e, d�v3�� fx - HaY,r� . . _ . iw.c - a�.�. / N3LJ 1v y � � . . . ��M � ` �i �" � H/GHMyY g ..Y�� j . . ----�-- , s u i3 , .. � �� I � � I , � , .. � . .. I CA S E�N 0. �=� � �z�—��. ; — s � �� j �- �; �. ; ; s - ' ' , RESOLUTION NO. 2544 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION '. OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING , TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP'N0. 24301 TO � CONSOLIDATE FOUR (4) PARCELS INTO ONE (1), AND VACATE PORTIONS OF' AN EXISTING ALLEY, AS SHOWN ON COUNTY ASSESSOR'S BOOK NOS.6193- 002 -016-017,020 AND 021, � RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. wHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood , pursuant to law on May 9., 1995, , conducted a public hearing on ' the subject application; and , WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development has determined that the proposal will not have a negative effect on the environment, and has thereby declared a Negative Declaration for the project; and _ wHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered all pertinent testimony offered in the case as presented at the public hearing; and wHEREAS, the preparation, filing and recordation of Parcel Map is required for development; therefore: Section 1_ The Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that said Tentative Parcel Map No. 24301 in the C-3.(Heavy Commercial) zone, should be approved for the following reasons: A. The consolidation meets all the applicable requirements and conditions imposed by the State Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code. B. The proposed consolidation of lots is consistent with the applicable elements of the General Plan and the Official Zoning Ordinance of the.City of Lynwood. ' C. Proper and reasonable provisions have been made for - adequate ingress and egress to the subdivision of the parcel. �. - D. Proper and adequate provisions have been made for all ' public utilities and public services, including ' sewers. Section 2. , The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood , hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 24301 in the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone, subject to the following conditions. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. 2. The applioant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he has read, understands and agrees to the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, before any building permits are issued. � � f:\resotutn\reso2544 � . � . 1 � �. . PLANNING DIVISION , 3. Within twenty-four (24) months after approval or conditional approval of the Tentative Parcel Map, the subdivider shall file with the City of Lynwood, a Final Map in substantial conformance with the Tentative Parcel Map as conditionally approved, and in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Lynwood. ' 4. No grading permit or building permit shall be issued prior to recordation of the Final Map or another. appropriate instrument approved by'�he City of Lynwood. . 5. The Final Parcel Map shall be filed with the City Engineer ' of the City of Lynwood. 6. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in� sanitary condition upon approval of the Tentative Parcel . Map and shall be maintained in a neat and orderly ` manner at all times. 7. Extension of the Tentative Map approval shall only be considered if the applicant or his/her representative, submits a written request for extension , to the Community Development Department stating the reasons for the request, at least thirty (30) days before map approval is due to expire, pursuant to, and in compliance '" „ with Section 25-18 of the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Lynwood.' ; ' � DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING 8. Submission and recordation of a parcel map or tract map is required. Building permits will•,not be issued prior to recordation of subdivision map. 9. Dedicate required property at the northwest corner of Pendelton Avenue and S. Atlantic Avenue to accommodate corner cut-off. 10. Submit a grading plan prepared and by a registered ` Civil Engineer: The gradinq plan will be checked by the Public Works Department. No building permit will be issued prior to the approval of the grading plan by the City Engineer. 11. Construct new sidewalk curb and gutter, dri"ve approach(es) , and required pavement along Abbott�Road. 12. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk, curb and gutters along Pendelton Avenue, S. Atlantic Avenue and Abbott Road. 13. Construct 24" wide gutter and asphalt pavement along property frontage along Abbott Road. 14. Construct a new drive approach per.City standards. 15. Close existing drive approach(es) and construct proposed ' four (4) drive approach(es). 16. Construct eight (8) wheelchair ramps at various locations ' around the project site. 17. Construct a,five (5) foo't wide planter to separate the sidewalks from the parking lots. 18. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected , separately. Construct laterals as necessary. . � t:reso2544 _ . � . . 2 � :� 19. Install forty (40) 24" box street trees per APWA STD . 520-1 along AbboCt Road, Atlantic Avenue and Pendeltpn Avenue. Species to be determined by Public Works. A permit to install the trees is required by the Engineering Division. Exact locations of the trees will be determined at the time the permit is issued. . 20. Construct tree well covers per City of Lynwood standards for existing and proposed street trees. 21. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass. - 22. Provide and install six (6) marbelite street poles with " light fixture, underground services and conduits alonq Abbott Road.and Pendelton Avenue. 23. Underground all utilities. 24. All Edison vaults and structures shall be placed underground. 25. A permit from the Engineering Divisions is required for all off-site improvements. 26. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or , fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the developer. The contractor• must obtained a permit � from the Public Works/Enqineering Division prior to performing any work. 27. Apply for alley vacation and pay for all vacation cost. or vacate as part of the parcel map or tract map. 28. Abandon the water and gas lines in the alley. 29. Remobe all weeds from sidewalks, drive approaches and curb and gutters. �30: Relocate, at developer's expense, any utilities from those portions of the alley proposed to be vacated. Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the applicant. , APPROVED and ADOPTED this 9 th day of May, 1995, by ' members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: NOES: . ABSENT: ABSTAIN: .. Carlton McMiller, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: - ` Gary Chicots, Director Michele Beal Barneris Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney . . ,' f:\resolutn\reso2544 � � � _ 3 i _ ��-�-�- aGE�,�DA ITEM N0. 3 DATE: May 9, 1995 �� , � To: PLANNING COMMISSZON FROM: Gary Chicots, Director �,/�� Community Development Department / �/ SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Case No 95-03 (82046R) Applicant: Maria DeJesus Llamas PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a modification of Conditional Use Permit 82046 to permit auto electric repair where the previous use permit allowed the sale of parts and supplies only at 12001 Long Beach Boulevard, in the C-2A (Medium Commercia2) zone. FACTS: . - 1. Source of Authoritv Section 25-16.15 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to operate any automot'ive repair business. 2. ProAertv Location - The subject property consists of a regular shaped lot on the west side of Long Beach Blvd. between Agnes Avenue and Cedar ' Avenue (see attached location map). 3: Propertv Size _ The subject property approximately 15,000 square feet in ' size. . 4. Existing Land Use The subject site contains three existing structures which are to be converted into a storaqe ;warehouse, parts a•nd work area (enclosed area for auto repairs). The surrounding land . uses are as follows: North-COmmercial East-Commercial ' � South-COmmercial West-Residential 5. Land Use Description � General Plan: Zoning: North-Commercial North-C-2A South-Commercial South-C-2A East-Commercial East-C-2A . ' West-Residential West-R-1 6. Project Characteristics: The applicant proposes to modify Conditional Use Permit Case No. 82046 originally granted for'an automotive parts and supplies store in order to include automo�ive repairs. The � operation will contain an office, parts shop, existing � dwelling to be converted to storage warehouse, and provide an enclosed structure for automobile repairs. The proposal • calls for eight (8) parking spaces, including one (1)' handicap space. Seven (7%) percent landscaping is designed for the subject site. The applicant has made some improvements to the site through the City's Commercial Rehabilitation Program. 1 '� Y.�� • 7. Site Plan Review At its regular meeting on April 2T; 1995, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and ~'•� recommended denial due to an incomplete application. � 8. Zonina Enforcement History , Conditional Use Permit. Non'conforming signs on premises. Illegal auto repair currently being conducted. 9. Public Responses Concern over illegal auto repair and apparent parts salvage expressed by a Planning Commissioner. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: � , 1. Consistencv with General Plan The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning classification of (C-2A) Medium Commercial and General Plan designation of Commercial. 2. Site Suitabilitv The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development relative to structures, parking, walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Comaatibility � � The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of commercial developments; therefore, the project will be compatible with the surrounding land uses. 4. Compliance with Develooment Standards The proposal meets the development standards required by the Zoning ordinance with respect to setbacks, lot coverage, building height and density. The current operation is not� complying with requirements to conduct auto repair operations within an enclosed building. 5. Benefits to Communitv The proposed use, if constructed and operated as proposed will upgrade the property and provide additional employment _. and economic activity in the Community. The applicant has • stated that she wiIl cease the current automofive repair � activity. 6. EnvironmenEal Assessment The Community Development Department_Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt,pursuant to Section � 15061 b(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act of 1989 as amended. RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission continue this hearing until the app]icant _ submits a complete application and resolves her conflict with the property owner. " �� f:\us5lan\staffrpt\cup95•03 . � z . ..---�--- _......___..._ � :�..- --...—.....___.__... �. LO�CATION iV1AP - A.� ' �� j 3 7M �I � � � ' � -.L�i ...... b ' I 67� r . � � ji I ' � � � ' � � b� v ` �, i ne � �, IiQ � �c5 `�;; � I ��P�i � . ; s • �� „�,� � ,�� ` � e�� ,a �` x+`� b � 1 � � �y � � y � a' s° o' �p, et� 1111f � M ��u � . � b ^ /4 s e� � � •� � � �� '3 o i ,�� ) � � `. � �' , . � i R ` '� ro� ' • , Q ! �Q� ° � � �` ° � � "� a � I a� � hi ' 1• � . ta� h °� eor � �' >• \2� g � � "' �r �°'r !s � ' �sTo y � � b' ° � ° �i YO • ^ y � " • r°e � m� er: j ��$� irra � v P� ^ yy � •' ' � �ioe� � ea A� ,' �q� iyl� . 1 ' � 1 0 , � `, � . �� ^� 3 � ^ �� y ��ol� 11 g � o "� �^ l��l $ • �s,� . o , � ' x ' R �'� 'a' � ° � n . ? p. 'r�'FAyL'. . � l, ' , a. � • . �l •o .- � s�r� '° I ^� 4 - �. b � Ido� �� ,z q, 'J. ,io� ' �Ji C� R ^J� �` p ° 'D� � c� M � �°�1 " n ^0 N �,' b Q 'y h��,� . '�] . : �` ' � 7 �j 'y y 1 � � I . �v �. J ' � � rl � n=��a° ' �t Y ��; , , M � ? � ^`� � � � ta � ��-� i � � 1 � I io+ � �a ., '�/ ro. � �7e) etr�doa � � so 1 �\� t $ M1 � 7 S ° t�� In� . /� Q/ C�.�� x ''�� . � n ��0 W _ � �,.,$' � �e'/� $ • . w � rte � � � E r.o-,��., Y a o � .� t �,�!° o ` .m , �\� g � a „ - a u �� ' �e:� M ^, �, ' . ' a' �u -. i� � .�. � rU .0 � .. f ,_.. y U f � � /j / `�o � ys � �� '1° ' 'wt J ' ^: A �� i ° � � !!° . 5 �� ` H j91� "/ 671 �� 1 ,\ aF`�G� � ' t - �-��i yM � , � � q Ryj � .� y � � � � '.r � ' /1�� ' � r �\� ^ .'�!- .di� I I m911 �1 � y i . . F �uc,p,�k"^� w"� � ^�' �,,� 1 � � � � � �� °°° ' 2 ., e �z , N �r ° � .� �, I a ��" 991��I� ,. .� N �'� �" �'� .� MI . � -� � ` t , � �� o�?.,� `� ,rvc s J L ` "l � .T '.�*� n ^, ?� • b o YA � � " � �. � . suct:- i`• roo' CASE N0 �l�P � .5 -�� . 9 3 : , 1 ..:. . . e DATE: May 9, �995. AGENDA iTEM N0 � TO: PLANNING CONII'�IISSION �n� �O • H FROM: Gary Chictos, Director , Community Development Department � BY: Robert Diplock, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 95-04 Applicant: St. Francis Medical Center Proposal• , The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit . to construct an 8 story hospital tower with single bed rooms housing acute care patients on the medical center campus located - at 3630 Imperial Highway, in the HMD (Hospital Medical & Dental) _ zone. The structure will replace the existing hospital and reduces the number of licensed patient beds from 478 to 350. Facts• L - Source of Authoritv Section 25-13.8 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that ' all new buildinqs or structures developed. in the HMD . (Hospital Medical & Dental) zone, obtain approval of a Conditional Use Permit from the Planning Commission. � 2. Propert� Location The property is located in the Hospital, Medical, and Dental (HMD) zone on the south side of East Imperial Highway, at Martin Luther King Jr. BouleLard. The property presently houses St. Francis Medical Center (medical facilities, parking structures and power p,lant and associated structures). The site for the proposed 8 story plus hospital tower is a portion of the existing acute care hospital. The proposed facility lies within an area covered by the St. Francis Medical Center Master Plan on file witkl the y Community Development Department. 3. Pronertv Size � The subject property is an irregular shaped lo� of approximately 12.6 acres. 4. Existina Land Use • The subject'site is flat, containing the St. Francis Medical Center and parking garage structures. The surrounding uses are as follows: North - Commercial South - Public Park East - Hospital, Medical, West - Commercial/ ,Parking Garage Structures Residential - 5. Land Use Descriotion General Plan: Zonina: North - Commercial North - HMD, CB-1 , South-- Public Park South - Community Facility . • East - Commercial/ East - HMD, R-3 Townhouse and Cluster Housing 1 West - Commercial/ West - C-2 (General Multi-Family Commercial)/R-3 Residential (Multiple Family , Residential) 6. Proiect Characteristics• , As a part of an approved'St. Francis Medical Center Master Plan and modernization of the existing hospital to compliment the new birthing center under construction, the � applicant proposes to construct an 8 story plus hospi.tal tower with 350 single bed rooms housing acute care patients. The structure will replace the existing hospital reduces the number of licensed patient beds from 478 to 350. The hospital tower will contain the terrace floor (maintainance & storage), first floor (kitchen, administration & general service), second floor (office & support service), third floor (medical office & lounge) fourth, fifth, sixth and � seventh floors (350 patient rooms),with intensive care unit rooms, and administrative offices oh the eighth floor.. 7. Site Plan Review At its regular meeting on April 27, 1995, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and' recommended approval to the Planning Commission, subject to specific conditions and requirements. 8. Zonina Enforcement Historv None of record. 9. Public Resoonse None of record. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: • 1. Consistencv with General Plan The proposed land use is consistent with the existing Zoning Classification (HMD) and General Plan designation of Commercial. Therefore, grantinq Conditional Use Permit No. : 95-04 will be in conformance with and not adversely affect - the General Plan. , 2. Consistencv with Medical Center Master Plan ' The proposed land use is consistent with the approved St. Francis Medical Center Master Plan. 3. Site Suitabilitv " The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development relative to structures, parking, ,, walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. � 4. Compatibilitv The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of commercial and hospital, medical and dental uses. There is ` a public park to the south; to the north, south and west of , the proposed use are commercial uses; and to the east are hospital, medica'1 and dental uses.' Therefore, the project will be compatible with the surrounding land uses. � � 5. Comoliance with DeveloAment Standards The proposal meets the development standards'required by the Zoning Ordinance with respect to setbacks, lot coverage, _ Z building height and density and CMP`requirements. The . Lynwood Municipal code require as a total of 350 parking spaces for the hospital tower, or one (1) parking space per bed. Based on a traffic impact analysis and parking study - for the medical center (including the 6irthing center under construction), prepared in December, 1993, 947 On site parking spaces will be available for the Medical Center. � Total demand is calculated to be 590 spaces. 6. Conditions of Aoproval The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, , safety or welfare ` 7. Benefits to Communitv The proposal will assist in upgradinq the Hospital, Medical, Dental uses of the property, provide improved medical ' services, and support the purpose and intent of the General Plan. 8. Environmental Assessment Staff has found that no substantial environmental impacts . will result from the proposed development; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been filed in the Community"' Development Department and in the office of the City Clerk. � RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully request that, after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2542: 1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit Case No. 95-04, will not Have a significant effect on the environment ' -- and certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate. � 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 95-04, subject to . the stated conditions and requirements. ATTACHMENTS'• � 1. Location Map 2. Resolution No. 2542 3. Site Plan f:\staffrpt\cup95•04 � �� . ' 3 ' RESOLUTION NO. 2542 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-04 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN 8 STORY HOSPITAL TOWER ON THE ST. . FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER CAMPUS AT 3630 EAST IMPERIAL HIGHWAY IN THE HMD . (HOSPITAL, MEDICAL, AND DENTAL) ZONE. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, �' on May 9, 1995 conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and ' WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined ; that the proposed development will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment, and has therefore prepared a Negative Declaration for the projec't; and WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for development of new uses in the HMD (Hospital, Medical and Dental) zone; therefore - Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as follows: ' A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the structures, parking, � landscaping, driveways and other development features as sequired by the Official Zoning Ordinance. _ „ B. The structure, as proposed, subject,to conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public, health, safety, pr welfare. C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current ' zoning regulations and site plan submitted and reviewed by the Site Plan Review Committee. D. The qranting of the Conditional Use Permit will be in conformance with and not adversely affect the General Plan. E. The 'proposed development will aid in upgrading the area ' and will act as a catalyst in fostering other quality " developments in the surrounding area. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby approves Conditional Use Permit Case No. 95-04, provided the following conditions are observed and complied with at all times. � � f:\resolutn\reso95-04 � - . . 1 • , COMNIUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, for review. 3. The applicant and/or his representative shall s.igri a .Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, ,' understands; and�agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance of any building permits. REDEVELOPMENT DIVZSION 4. The proposed project located in Redevelopment Project Area � "A" shall be presented to the Redevelopment Agency for ' approval. � , 5. The project design shall provide for access and dirculation . of vehicular, pedestrian, and emergency vehicle traffic in a safe, logical and efficient manner, both to the site (off- site) and within the site (on-site). 6. , The development shall be of a quality and character which � enhances and harmonizes with existing developments located in the surrounding area. , 7. The proposed design shall be compatible with existing developments in the area in terms of scale, height, bulk, materials, colors. S. The main entrance to the primary building shall provide for . independent access to the physically impaired in accordance � ' with Title 24. ° 9. The street address shall be displayed in a prominent location on the street side of the building. All address ` numbers shall be easily visible to vehicular and/or pedestrian traffic. The street address shall be no less than six (6) inches in height and no less than 3/4 inch, stroke width and shall be of a color contrasting to the background to which they are attachad, subject to review and approval of Fire Department. l0. On-site lighting shall be installed along all vehicular access ways and major walkways. Such lighting shall be directed onto the driveways and walkways within the , development and away from adjacent properties. , 11. The parking aisle width shall be twenty-five (25') feet. 12. Exits from parking lot shall be clearly posted with stop signs. 13. No sign shall be erected without a sign permit. The Director - or his designee shall issue the sign permit upon approval by ' the Planning and Redevelopment Divisions. .T4. Only indivi'dual illuminated channel letters shall be permitted. ' t 15. Billboards signs are prohibited. 16. There shall be a periodic revaew of the applicant's compliance with all of the requirements, at a time specified by the Director, but in no event longer than 12 months. _ 2 , _� 17. The applicant or his/her successor in interest shall provide � evidence of qood-faith compliance with all of the requirements at the time of said review. 18. If, at the end of the time period established by the Director or his/her designee, the applicant or his/her : successor in interest has failed to comply_with all of the requirements, the Director or his/her designee, shall notify the Planning Commission of his/heY findings and recommend such action as deemed appropriate, according to the Lynwood Municipal Code. PLANNING DIVISION 19. The Congestion Management Program Plan (CMP) requires that the project provide the following to the satisfaction of the ` Director of Community Development: � a. A bu2letin board, display case, or kiosk displaying transportation information located where the greatest number of employees are likely to see it. Information in the area shall include, but is not limited to,,the following: l. Current maps, routes and schedules for public . transit routes serving the site; , 2. Telephone numbers for referrals on transportation information including numbers for the regional ridesharing agency and local transit operators; 3. Ridesharing promotional material.supplied by commuter-oriented organizations; 4. Bicycle route and facility information, including �. regional/local bicycle maps and bicycle safety ; � information; 5: A listing of facilities available for carpoolers, . vanpoolers, bicyclists, transit riders and pedestrians at the site. b. Not less than 8.5% of the total number of required parking shall be Tocated as close as is practical to the employee entrance(s), and shall be reserved for use by potential carpool/vanpool vehicles, without displacing handicapped and customer parking needs. This- preferential carpool/vanpool parking area.shall be identified on the site plan upon application for building permit, to the satisfaction of the City of Lynwood Community Development Department. A statement that preferential carpool/vanpool spaces for employees are available and a description of the method for obtaining such spaces must be included on the required . transportation information board. Spaces will be ' signed/striped as demand warrants; provided that at all times at least one space for projects of 50,000 square feet to 100,000 square feet will be signed/striped for carpool/vanpool vehicles. c. Preferential parking spaces reserved for vanpools must be accessible to vanpool vehicles. When located within a parking structure, a minimum vertical interior clearance of 7'2" shall be provided for those spaces and . accessways to be used by such vehicles. Adequate ' turning radius and parkinq space dimensions shall also �be included in vanpool parking areas. . d. Bicycle racks or other secure bicycle parking shall be provided to accommodate four bicycles per the first 50,000 squa're feet of non-residential development and � 3 one bicycle per each additional 50,000 square feet of ' „ non development. Calculations which result. in a fraction of .5 or higher shall be rounded up to the ' nearest whole number. A bicycle parking facility may also be a fully enclosed space or locker accessible only to the owner or operator of the bicycle, which protects , the bike from inclement weather. Specific facilities and location (e.g. provision of racks, lockers, or locked room) shall be to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. 20. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving the proposed development. , 21.. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become vbid one hundred and twenty (120) days after the Conditional Use Permit has been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised. 22. Construction shall commence within six (6) months from date of issuance of building permits. Landscaoinq 23. The applicant is required to submit a landscape plan drawn. ' by a licensed landscape architect subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development prior to � issuance of a building permit. 24. All landscaped areas shall be landscaped with a mixture of ' ground cover, shrubs and trees, and may include decorative rock, sculpture, and walkways within the major parking area, , subject to review and approval of the Community Development Department. 25. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning Division prior to i:;suance of any building permits. The minimum plant materi.�l sha11 be trees and shrubs combined with ground cover 3s follows: one (1) five (5) gallon shrub for each 100 square feet of landscaped area; and two (2) fifteen gallon trees for each 500 square feet of landscaped areas. 26. The amount of landscaping required shall be provided and consistent with the proposed landscape plan. �- " 27. All existing mature trees and other significant vegetatiorr should be preserved and inteqrated into the,landscape plan to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director or his/her designee. • 28. All landscaping shall be permanently maintained. Lawn and ground covers are to be trimmed or mowed regularly, with all planted areas kept free of weeds and debris. All plantings , are to be kept in a healthy and growinq condition. An ' automatic irrigation system shall be provided and maintained in working condition. 29. Where vehicles are to be parked immediately adjacent to a . public or private street or alley, a decorative masonry wall , a maximum of thirty-six inches in height measured from the finished sur.face of the parking area shall be provided. If a wall is provided, there must,be minimum landscaping'to • screen the wall from street view and accessibility. 30. Prior to the installation or construction of any fence ox � masonry wall, the,property owner shall obtain a permit and submit the following information to the 4 Planning Division of the Community Development Department: � a. A simple plot 'plan showing the location of fence or ' masonry wall in relation to the property lines, heights, - proposed materials, and openings or gates to provide , access for vehicles and pedestrians. b. For masonry walls a building permit shall be applied for . upon.approval of the plot plan described above. All masonry walls of any height shall meet the requirements for masonry construction as defined in Chapter 24 of the Uniform Building Code. A fee based on the valuation of the proposed construction sha11 be paid to the Building Division. 31. All fences or masonry walls shall be required to maintain adequate pedestrian access for the purpose of safety and convenience. A thirty-six (36) inch or three foot clear gate or opening shall be provided to all enclosures for pedestrian and wheelchair access in accordance with Title '. 24. Pedestrian and vehicular access shall be provided. 32. All fences or masonry walls shall be required to be , installed with a finished,' aesthetically pleasing side facing out toward adjacent prqperties or the public right-of-way to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director or his/her designee. < 33: The applicant must provide trash enclosures consistent with the materials and color of the main building(s), with gates, on the site of the subject property. The trash enclosure shall'be built pursuant to 25-16.7 of the Municipal Code. Parkina _ 34. Provide one (1) parking space per bed. Adhere to the Findings and Conclusion (regarding parking) under the Draft Traffic Impact Analysis and Parking Study for St. Francis Medical Center in the City of Lynwood, California, December, � 1993 (Ref. No. 9310.05). 35. Each off-street parking space shall not be less than twenty (20) feet in length and nine (9) feet in width, exclusive of ' access driveways or aisles, except as noted below: . a. Any standard parking space that is immediately adjacent _, to a wall, structural column, light standards, or: similar obstruction on one or both of its longer sides' or in an enclosed space shall be at least ten (10') feet in width and twenty (20') feet in lenqth. b. At a minimum, two parkinq spaces designed for the handicapped shall be provided. These spaces may be provided as follows: 1. Dimensions: The minimum dimensions of each automobile parking stall for the handicapped sha11 be not less than fourteen (14) feet in width by twenty (20) feet in length. Said stalls shall be lined to provide a nine (9) foot parking area and a five (5) foot loading and unloading area or; - 2. Two (2) spaces may be provided within a twenty-three (23) foot wide area, lined to provide a nine (9} foot parking'area on each side of a five (5) foot ' loading and unloading ; area: The minimum length of each parking space shall be twenty (20) feet. 3. Location: AT1 parking spaces for the handicapped shall be located adjacent to the main entrance of the facility for which the spaces are provided. The 5 parking spaces shall be'.positioned so that bhe handicapped persons shall not be required to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles and shall be posted with appropriate handicap signage. 36. The parking lot plan for the subject site shall have a circular-flow arrangement without dead-end aisles when possible. 37. The applicant shall submit elevation drawings to the Planning Division showing the exterior building design, including the specification of colors, and materials. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the design of the subject building including color and materials, must obtain approval by the Director of Community Development. 38. Prior to the installation,. display, enlarging, modifying, relocating or changing of signs, a permit must be obtained from the Department of Community Development, Planning Division. 39. Central heating, cooling ventilation equipment, pumps and heaters and any such mechanical devices shall be screened from public view. Such equipment shall be screened from surrounding properties and streets and operated so that they do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring residents, in accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance. _, � All means of access to the referenced equipment shall be - designed and installed so as to prevent access to unauthorized persons and shall be approved by the Building • and Safety Division. 40. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally , compatible with the 'design of the subject and adjacent buildings., In addition, no security fences, grills, etc. shall be installed without the prior written approval of the . Director of Community Development and required building permits as per plan. 41. The existinq property shall be cleaned and maintained in a :� sanitary condition pending construction and shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure to comply 'may result in revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. 42. Applicant will maintain a pro-active approach to the elimination of qraffiti from the s,tructures, fences and any accessory building, on a daily basis. . Maintenance of sidewalk, parking area, gutters and any ' surrounding area will be done a minimum of twice a day (before starting operations and before closing). 43. A cover sheet with approved conditions must be attached to plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety �� Divisibn. ; 44. Any violation of said conditions in this resolution may ' result in revocation or modification of the Conditional Use � Permit by the issuing body at a regularly scheduled meeting. i PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEER DIVISION j 45. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered � Civil Engineer. Grading plan will be checked by the Public .. a Works Department. No building permits will be issued prior � to the approval of a grading plan by the City Engineer. � � i i 6 i � ' � ` 46. Construct four wheelchair ramps at Sanborn and Birch, , Mulford and Birch. , 47. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected esparately. Construct lateral as necessary. 48. Install twenty (20) 24" box street .trees per City of Lynwood . standards alonq Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard (north and south sides). '. 49. bonstruct tree well covers per City of Lynwood standards for existing and proposed street trees as needed. 50. Underground all utilities. 51. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all off-site improvements. 5,2. All required water meters, meter service chanqes and/or fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by. the developer. The contractor must obtain.a permit from the . Public Works/Enginerering Division prioY to performing any ` work. ' FIRE DEPARTMENT 53. No conditions at this time. _ Section 3. A copy of Resolution No. 2542 shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of May 1995 by members of the ' Planning Commission voting as follows: . AYES: . • . NOES : ABSENT: ' , ABSTAIN: Carlton McMiller Chairperson APPROVED,AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gary Chicots, Director Michele Beal Bagneris � Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney' ' . � . 7 . ' i � i , . ' ..1 r Y�, , . ��P' _�.,µ�. .�A .. • ' � . t. : '• � 1 � )t �-��•I. � . � • ' .e 'I . �� .�; �.-.-. �/�� t Ji� F • �it,• �� . " � r., e � y � . .'.%� .+ . � � ' A . . > � :�" • . `� * . j �:� r • . �fv ,+ . �� _ � .'-� •' ` � z t - r . , f . . + • � `c ,�;`, �� .'� ," + ' y�`,�r� ' '' o .�=� I ` p " _ ^ • _ � , i,' � . .i . � �T�— - +.�e�..- � !I', r- �, �i� � ' " �. ,y � I . � i �, � i � . ��YW1N'.FI.'1 l+qtn'-.'_ �1 s ;,�� ;` •'� �' ,� "�� , .'`'�`.. I , � � �':��'..y.' � F ' � y _ _ � I ...�.� ^ ,i ��• � / � r . � � ,'�, � �,. ' � ;rv �� t? �' �'� • '- I L� J.�/y� d� � : . , I , w ,�. j� � . ,�f /�._� :: • �►'....d � � � �` ,�� ; r :; `:�� y .,, �� i . � s ; ��'�' • _ ':. w�'il!'�Wes�� '' -. '. '' 'jF r , '"� � lai�� . i �� E� ��'�� ' S.I "�' , pf�i. �� - ''�z�z �a :�� ' � � _ a, ' ` j ' � `'t. ►� i. ie � . 1. •�?': 7 J., R . . ' � � , �� , r,� '2 Y j. , P ,�'��'�_` - ,: � � _ , �,y:�a . �I, A � ��I �� , :,;< ��/��'C�G.'ap `�I ,- ,, �..•:;,'t � •'+� � � � �� ,�', i � ;;�,ti� .,r� � � w i�w ' , :::�, ,j, '.;��,; � r . _ u � l i '��+'� � i, —,' - ,;� r �� j �, _ r, , �, .;r;,,� � ' `� t � k y y i , I , � �� ,;.t II• �. _ .,�� .' •.'. >;$!.�,.J t'' � ��', '� __' .-�� . .,'j,. _ ,. � `�n i %'i, � � ' '.'�. , �'.� . �-_...--'�I'O :. _- . amr� e�.� a e.m,. w / � - _ _ _ �NEI1�(� I�. �OYI .:I�Y�YYr�� Ev��O ,<-- � � � _. �. , �- O _ — �� :� A O � ' � / / � � •� Q� O . � . 6 • i ° � � • � f • . � � . P ure ..::�n� .. . . � . rr� � \ � 1 �� . � . Ov �cr � �o O o .0, 1 � °O ' i o . - ....�...,.��.. � O � NF�LTM �[11VIG/� �AV�l�O� � . � _ , � . � , ``� _'O ^ . � ♦ • `� L1 t • ` �� 1 - i .. I�`��Z��Q 0 �� s I _,_, _, � � � � , - _ - ------------- � - °� �- ° 0 1 � � , . ,.: o o ,, „ :�-, :: o � , ; . . . �uuo�wGOrrm� � , i unui ru• � . I � uewu om '� � . i I j 1 : •� � IEN� W�E IOw�B� � � . . I � � . . � 1 � �_ _______ I � , : / 1 ' . ' _�__�' . � \ I�� IY� ��11YCtYlIF � ' j^ S . � . � \ l�I��I�G MO��il�l / ' � . � ` .. I �Y� I �� `^ . , . . ` `t ♦ ,� a k _ � ____I c � // � � ' ' �e.� / ' . . . � � / i / i � ar�rr�atiadr .�. ��a , � � � .. rw�a �[ . . oavauwert nir � .. � . . _. . , . '� ` A71g � �_�� S � � �� v _ v v i v ' ',,:` , —_— V � � .. !'>'�i�� 1F11TtS!T �lTf�l1S'l �I�tA��I.■■■��I��1Oy�CL��1I��1.��L.TITTTII��II�tl� �II�� 4�i � v Cr�!!T. I��c!�al��xi 76�7G�� o:.-.- I = � �u�aui� - R71!!TR'.I �� 0O ��YIeTR!T �r�o�� 9im9i0.�lJ�lc.i�R63si�1is0:.:��ewscave�JTITTT c 1� ��w � .�:r�n�L4^L t ��p q��oiw�si eao��ie��Ra�yofpp�ee��RITRt}'.1 �s Ti• ��3�t. �1O■ �--�. _ _ ... . _ _:- � ... _ 0�� ° y �e��r'.� � _ . � w� ' �� I ��I i ��.��t..��I�.�� IH �� I �, ' ' �W�lil v , v °�� !° v o 0 0 o wm.��'� � I,I I��:o'�� i ua■ �s��s�� ' I� Ii �� nii�� e� ��.. _��__ �'.a �. ree�a m�a �� ul v �� _..�� ,��!_� �:� "' !��■�0■��D��r'".iei110■��L�■��=.:'.=.I��IIII%%�I�Q�� :; coa�ll,� '��„��w� � —�� _� o � . —�� a� I".n��ar:�iea�r�::�o—ao�m'o�a:.�cs��wal�� a �� " �o■ ��sa��wr.�t.��u�� ,I�� ' ° ��i ° 0.�� ° 0��►°.1 ° ►.�'b'�J ° j°j��ii'��r�r�r�.�t�,o �.. � �� r�■ �� ,�,��'�� ■�■��■�■■■�■�1��1■■■IiY■iII�IW::::�� ,� � --� --------�---�-.---p---Q.�.��eoe�e�o��e� � :o:lliiiii�0�niiiiHiii�iiiw:: o .■s■ �� rpl��A�� . - �o_. a o 0 0 0 _.o__��o�teA :_:I�O�■■0■��IO��BO��■■� :==1��IIIIIN :o: ��w■■s�o��.�N■��e■■�:=== ` ° �o=:'--o �a■ ��...��..�■.,�� :_:��ww■�■o��■i��■■��■■====1�IIIi1�I��111V. � :w: ��oal��e�a��li��L�LiLasi�1��I �I � .N.�IO��a��10��1��Aee�Y1... ��I��IIa� ._. --- --_e-�----�---. , L.��.�.----I��i�i��S111B E ■�■ �aw��a�'��M��w�.ss.Wnee�� . iiii:ii��[O�ri��[07�8��[OIi��N[01��:o.T� �in-5��y(y��. , ■!�� 'v' ° v v iiw� w�� y''. � / � i �f i�hi °u�� I��I��!'I�!� ��■ w�� ' Y MTTT � \ �,I � � '�.�.�,r��==: ,. ., ., ,�� ° �. � ��► � " � �ir �� e ° `v' v � O O O O m O O � O 0 O m� p p p O O m . DATE: May 02, 1995 TO; HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE AGENCY FROM: Faustin Gon2ales, Executive Director BY: Gary Chicots, Director ` Community Development Department SUBJECT: PROPOSED REPLACEMENT AND MODERNIZATION OF ST: FRANCIS , HOSPITAL AT THE MEDICAL CENTER CAMPUS, 3630 IMPERIAL AVENUE IN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA "A". Purpose: To inform the Agency of a proposal to construct an 8 story hospital building on the St, Francis Medical Center Campus. The new building will replace the existing hospital and reduce the number of licensed patient beds from 478 to 350. Backaround: As part of the approved St. Francis Medical Center Master Plan, the applicant is proposing to replace the existing hospital facility with a modern acute care hospital on the Medical Center Campus. The hospital will be an 8 story building of approximately 280,000 sq_ ft. with a 35,00 sq.ft. foot print. The first three floors will house kitchen, maintenance, laboratories, offices and support , services. Floors four through seven will be 350 single bed patient rooms and the eight floor will be administrative services. - Analvsis• � 'ACCOrding to the Director of Facilities �Ianagement, it is no longer practical to remodel the existing St. FYancis hospital to.provide modern hospital care. Structural deficiencies are such that a _ seismic retrofit of existing buildings would not be cost effective. In addition, the general reduction�in length of patient stay means that the hospital can operate witH fewer patient rooms. So a new hospital has been designed to replace the existing hospital buildings. Demolition and construction will be staged to minimize - disruption to hospital operations. •The new building will become a major landmark in Lynwood. The building is contemporary design, over eight stories high with a glass atrium tower and will be clad in exposed aggregate concrete, - glass and metal panels. By going up eight stories, the hospital will be able to provid'e significantly more open space and a new formal entrance area. ' The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan designation of Commercial and the zoning designation of Hospital- Medical-Dental (H-M-D). It is also consistent with the approved Medical Center Master Plan, except that the replacement will be built all at once rather than in two stages. � A traffic study carried out as part of the approval of th'e new birthing center in 1994 indicated that the combined hospital, . birthing center and medical office building would not overload adjacent streets. The new hospital building will have fewer beds than existing and staff levels will also be reduced, so that ,. traffic will be less with the new facility than at present. The analysis of parking requirements indicates that there currently is adequate parking and that parking demand will be reduced with the new construction and that 27 additional spaces will be .provided. • ,�„ - _ PARKING REOUIREMENTS Hospital Medical Provided � existing 478 240 ' 937 , future 350 240 964 Recommendation: ' Staff respectfully requests that the Agency receive and file this , report. ` Wpfiles\planning\AGCYSTFR.mem , i . ' ' i� ?� --."v'�► - . AGE�dD�A ITEM NU. S DATE: May 9, 1995 �f;� r E�J, •O ' TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GaYy Chicots, Director Community Development Department' SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment - Case No. GPA 95-01 Applicant: KRS Development Corporation PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of.a General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan designation from Commercial to Residential for approximately one acre of land on the north side of Redwood Avenue between State Street and Peach Street in order to develop single-family housing. This application was continued by, the Planning Commission to the May 9, 1995, meeting to allow the applicant the opportunity to meet with the community which had questions on the proposed amendment. FACTS: 1. Source of Authoritv: Section 65358(a) of the State Planning and Zoning Law states that "...if it deems it to be in the public interest, the I legislative body may amend all or part of the adopted General ; Plan." , 2. Propertv Location: The subject property is located on the north side of Redwood � Avenue between State Street and Peach Street and consists of I ; port.ions of lots 8-42, Assessor's Book 6171, page 12, i 3. Prooertv Size: I The property is irregular in ;cape and is comprised of several � lots and has a total area cf ::tiproximately 47,000 sq. ft. The � subject site is currently -.,��r.tained as a vacant lot. 4. Existina and Use• The surrounding land uses are as Eollows: ' North - I-105 Freeway South - Single-Family East - Single-Family West - Multi-Family 5. Land Use Desianation• The General Plan Designation for the subject property is I commercial while the Zoning Classification is. R-1 (Single- Family). The surrounding land use designations are as follows: ; General Plan Zonina North - Transportation North - Transportation � South - Single-Family South - Single-Family East - Single-Family East - Multi-Family 4Jest - Single-Family West - Multi-Family � � 6. Proiect Characteristics• The General Plan Amendment would allow for developmerit of i eight (8) single-family units on the property. A subdivision map is proposed to be filed after the Plan amendment. i 1 , ._, 7. Site Plan Review: The Site Plan Review ("SPR") Committee reviewed the proposed amendment and concluded that such request to amend the General Plan would bring the General Plan and the zoning in conformity with each other and the land use designation would be consistent with the existing uses in the general vicinity of the subject site. 8. Zonina Enforcement Historv: None of record at the time this report was prepared. 9. Public Response: � None of record at the time this report was prepared. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS 1. Consistencv with General Plan The existing General Plan land use designation of commercial � is inconsistent with the existing zoning classification of R-1 ; ' (Single-Family). The General Plan Amendment, if granted, would eliminate the inconsistency and would allow a proposed residential development to be found consistent with the ' General Plan. 2. Area Suitabilitv � ; The surrounding area is primarily developed with single family housing. The fre.eway to the north is elevated so that exterior noise levels fall within an acceptable range. Streets ar.d ! utilities in the area are sufficient to serve future � development. 3. Compliance with Development Standards ' Any future residential development in the area will comply � with City development standards. However, the current development proposal will require some minor variances in rear yard setbacks and lot depth because of the shape of the ' property. 4. Compatibilitv � The amendment is compatible with existing development in ��.� � area of the subject site. 5. Communitv Impact The General Plan Amendment will not have a negatiye effect •�. the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with o: endanger the public health, safety or welfare. i The applicant, at the request of the Planning Commission, met � with the property owners on April 19, 1995, to discuss the � intent of the amendment and to hear the concerns expressed by � the property owners at the April 11, 1995, relative to the proposed housing. The Applicant made a presentation to the � property owners where ultimately the owners had a favorable ! response to the amendment and the intent of the amendment. � 6. Benefits to Communitv � The proposed General Plan Amendment will enhance the residential development in the surrounding area, and provide additional commeicial services for the neighborhood. � 2 � � ,;, 7.. Environmental AssessmenE ° The Director of Community Development has determined that no . substantial environment impact will result from the proposed General Plan Amendment; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been filed in the Community Development Department and in the Office of the City Clerk. RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2545: 1. Certifying that the project will not have a significant , effect on the environment and that a Negative Declaration . has been issued pursuant to the provisions of State CEQA . Guidelines. � 2. Approving General Plan Amendment 95-01 and recommending City Council adoption of the General Plan Amendment. Attachments , 1. Location Map 2. City Map' 3. Resolution No.2545 f:\wpfiles\4pa9501.krs . .� v , . , 3 _. � � ' . ' . OOQMNA7 . .. . � . . . . � . . � � �r;. ��1`��i a'n' i ��, � .' ; o - �w ' i � - - . . � �.o a�.a� r N ��t� . tf0 I . �>�� i � � � � . � � " . . � . � _...,+s!a��s� i ��ualni ' �� "��fCr � ar i � rc�rr�`ra . . � I ! I j I � �+ �, s S�/ q �� , ! � o� j 3f4 nW ; �(� � � I 1 ��;�� ! i � \� � �''�l`��i� �1�i � � V J i I � � II i , � I' �k � 's o�, o •, , � . � � � � ws ��u�qif �fll�/ �!w.li.p;OMf/�t/��/ a��• . e�� n jb:P�MGiM ��ijr� I � ' - ' � .�. c�� I ,i Hi ' i ta '�" " i � E I . p .o M -Itr : `c � � ' c � . . ~ . 37�d/� � , % a � ��s 0 ��., a a � o �o� � � 1 . . cc cr n n _ _ _ 3SOd „ �" a - � �, .� •, �, � L : h ��1 �' 4 I -: s�� i I 'w�' � �'� �`�;� `c �° ° �I � I I i a, � i��!�;�� o�' . .. � / piNfYY O � oFhl�`o �'� I `� , `I��Y/ M . S!� �';'i� D o ' �I1 . 1 � + �' /� a h�,�.t �' i�, 1 T�� , I T ; ��, �, a , w j . . ofHl/ . � R'r�1 u � '�'�n t� i. n t r' t r l rri r�asrac .. .. ^ � . . . \ . . , � � � . �'�i� � y � J ti tSb/(t o O ' b`�� o o O . �. • �i�i . �p I/ $ �_ s` Cc �' ° ` � Ah�� Oli . w.� K:r �° O " �* � ^vb� y ° �N�Y OIDOMO d o' t� � � O � y I4 y � ' � " — � �� 7NCS r � h r �. � �1 • u � �. y _ � : � , •a. „ � � .. : �, . , .. ' - � � : : ., � .�.i� � �aMa„j Sot—� e�no '�, ; �, ,, � � S I , �� I O •� � �� es aY y . g � I ,r. .. ' � � �► � e . Ellr `�qMNb�3./ i � �K► = rs y a- g , 1 �� y � �r t �llpO0t1lA `� L�i � a�aZIY y . � I; p �p,� y y 1/ o., - �� Gs � . . � . "� Ytsi p . ^ 1 ' ts � q • . e�� u oFercu• ai� � _ L . � :_ � f � . ,- - - - " .r . �.�...�, SStqi . • • .ur.n1.p�c' . " . ' . ' n � t� �.� li : '. ._ "..: . "-. . .. ._.�... .... � -- .._.. �:�� ...._.. �� ... . ._ ......:. .�'..'.. �. :.: _:� ..' :�'� :: A - _ . , '[ • .:�. � . '.•'' I , �. � � ------- - : .�.,_ „ �—� , , r-c. , ,` ; _,� � I y � I __ ' \ \ \ � � �'�; i I � �� .. � _ �� ` � �� >�\ � \� �.:� ; Q �,� f, /� ,�C _ � � � �� "'�� m "` ' �x J i' �' � � q ..� � . ;�.:"' ;�� J��4" .. ,i . � _ � �!- � i1 - ,'�\J ��,; ,�� l��i_�'�/ / � v ,�Cc - �, . � � ��j� ry � �`�' - ' '� _ . _ �_� - !l� % . � f�� I � . .. � _ , , �(I .� ' a �I� o`�'� � .- :` �n �('� - �� - ,..i��/� �lIl /��>' �� J�, „�� ' �� ,,,,;�7�_ � � �,� �� _�� .. ` .,l`j� ,�,Jl,. � . _ - � c �,�� J� ;;T� ,�� :��'--�---�- o �'��: ��Q .I�l � , . � � ,-� _-, , �� . sa'� '�� d� � , , � � ; (y : `j � Q � I ' . �+ . ( ay `� y�y: {>.� �l : `'�' / � /' /,� � ' . . � ;' ! , ' ' ." � � � � Q � � � o �� ,� O � , � , , �., , 1 � ii _ � : � ,j � : I !�i�' d � y.,, � Z � nr � � i J '� � � � . � •' ' � I , O � ^ 1 u ` • '.. . ' �� , � � . . � � . � '`:'�' � � C� ;' j _ ` ,, ; , , , , ,, , �. -. " .�-- ,�-•--,.... ' � c+� . „ �, . , � . f� RESOLUTION NO. 2545 A RESOLUTION OF .THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD RECOMMENDING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LYNWOOD GENERAL PLAN PERTAINING TO LOT 10 AND A PORTION OF LOTS 8,9, p,1.TD 14 THRU 42 OF THE MODJESKA 14 PARK TRACT PAGES 142- 143 OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER OFFICE, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, LOCATED ON REDWOOD AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, •pursuant to law, held a public hearing on the subject application; and , WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered a11 pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Commission has determined that residential use of this property would be consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan; and ' WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development has determined that the proposal wi11 not have a negative effect on the - environment, and has thereby declared a Negative Declaration for the project; and SecEion 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood �hereby finds and determines as follows: ' A. A residential designation of this_property would be compatible with surrounding land use. � B. • The subject site would accommodate proposed development due to its size, location, and proximity to other and residential `land uses. C: The General Plan �endment to Residential would be . consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. D.- The proposed General Plan Amendment will not be detrimental to the properties surrcunding the site. Section 2. The Planning Ccr,mission of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findinqs and determinations, hereby ' approves General Plan Amendment Case No. (GPA 92-01), and recommends City Council adoption of a resolution changing the " General Plan map designation for this property from Commercial to Residential. Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1995 by members the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: NOES: . ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 1 f � " ..� ' ' ' . . . , . Carlton McMiller, Chairperson � , APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:' APPROVED AS TO FORM: '. Gary Chicots, Director Michele Beal Bagneris, Community Development Dept. Interim Deputy City Attorney f:\Wpfiles\gpa95-Ol.res 4 . . ` ; 2 , :i- _ . �'' DATE: May 9, �995 AGENDA ITEM N0. � TO: • PLANNZNG CONII'�IISSION CAS� t��J. ��b - FROM: Gary Chicots, Director, ,/� Community Development Department ��✓ � BY: Robert Diplock, Planninq Manager � SUBJECT; Conditional Use Permit Case Na 95-06 Applicant: Feliciano Ramos Probosal• The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to sell beer and wine for on-site consumption in an existing seafood restaurant at 11098 Atlantic Avenue in the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) Zone. � Facts . 1. Source of Authoritv: Sections 2�5-16.2oc of tfie Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a Conditional Use Permit be approved to allow establishments to sell alcoholic beveraqes. 2. Prooerty Location and Size � The site is located on the east side'of Atlantic Avenue � between Los Flores and Elmwood Avenue (see the attached „ location map). The subject property is an irregular lot, _". approximately 15,000 square feet (150'x 90') im size. 3. Existina Land Use ' The.subject property is developed with a mini mall consisting � of a seafood restaurant (1,110 square feet) and approximately 3,000 square feet of other retail stores. The existinq seafood restaurant, subject of the request for a permit for the on-sale of beer an3 wine, is located within the mini mall. The surrounding land uses are as follows: • North - Commercial ° South - Commercial East - Residential West - Commercial 4. , Land Use Desicfnation The General Plan designation for the subject property is Commercial, while the Zoning Classification is C-3 {Heavy �, Commercial. The surrounding land use designations and zoninq are as follows: General Plan Zoaing North - Commercial C-3 South - Commercial C-3 , East - Commercial C-3 West -,Commercial , C-3 : 5., Proiect Characteristics The applicant proposes to se11 beer and wine only at an , existinq seafood restaurant. The site is developed as a mini mall with three (3) retail spaces. There are 11 parking . spaces provided. The restaurant is small, with a fairly large open kitchen �_ area and six tables. Both the exterior and interior is simply, but nicely decorated and' obviously legitimate 1 - Fy, . . � .. � , ' . ' restaurant and not a tavern or beer bar. The subject site meets the development standards of the Code. Ordinance No. 1141 allow a bona fide, restaurant to sell alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption within 150 ft. of residentially zoned properties with a conditional use permit. BONA FIDE RESTAURANT is defined as a place which is regularly used and kept open for the serving of ineals to guests for , compensation and which has suitable kitchen facilities for � cooking of an assortment of foods which may be required for � meals. . MEAL is defined as the usual assortment of foods commonly ordered at various hours of fhe day; however, a menu offering food and victuals such as sandwiches, snacks, and/or salads . on1v, shall not be deemed as bei'ng in compliance with this requirement. The applicant was informed as to the concern of staff that , the:restaurant may be too small to be considered a bone fide . restaurant. However, the Zoning Ordinance does not define a minimum size for bone fide restaurants. 6. Site Plan Review At its regular,meeting on April 7�, 1995, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and recommended approval to the Planning Commission subject to stated conditions. 8. Zoning Enforcement History None of record at the time this report was prepared. 9. Neighborhood Resoonse ' None of record at�the time this report was prepared. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION 1. Consistency with General Plan and Zonina Ordinance The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning classification of C-3 and the General Plan designation of Commercial. Bone fide restaurants are exempt from the � distance requirements for bars, taverns and off sale facilities. • 2. Site Suitabilitv . The property is adequate in size to accommodate the proposed development. The lot/site.meets current development standards relative to structures, parking, walls, fences,' landscaping, driveways and other feature required by the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Compatibilitv ' ' The proposed development is surrounded by commercial and other uses. Permitting the sale of alcoholic beverages at this site would not be incompatible with the adjacent commercial uses., but may have a negative effect on adjacent residential uses. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT . � The Community Development Director has determined that the , project is categorically exempt from provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15061b (3) of the State CEQA,Guidelines as amended. . Z RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully requests that the.Commission, after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution No. 2548: 1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit Case No. 95-06 is categorically exempt from the provisions of the � California Environmental Quality Act. 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 95-06, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. Attachments• ,, 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan - 3. Resolution 2548 � fi\staffrpt\cup95-OG . � . � � , 3 --. ......_ � -- --___. � LOCATION MAP � � 1 �,� - ; is : `n j _//��" � ' r 1 � �1 � '� �'4,'Y3 • ` � � � " � \� � g B � 4\O A � . , i 1 H :.�95 i .n � \p �g Q . ' • � 4�� ^ P� , �1 y��1�,iqs31 m *- = _ ,b ' �2 ," , s '' ,. �l Mi�� . � � g A ,8` ' � \ ` ?N`^ � � * �1 p0. _ � f��s - 4 fj 13.N �� . ab �'u � � p� • � 4� \- e \ � � 8�'�� ♦ ! : HIGH , ' A� >�c'" �� e �� 4 �T � ,�:;� m . . . . w, iti MS�� , u�� j � ' q�B . � � + tin r.N ' m. - � 5 b - a y .Z �' Q u ^� '. ~ i oT1(� '9 s:�.wR g= . a, a � �� fa r � � � � � -Y . �o r ' . oRgS'` ' uc4 R .�.� , �r'�?� r. r . 1 � � . . f�.w �' _ y� � Q °' .a ' a�.-.,� ... � o �` � � . . ��Oi � �� A I� 7 �: Q • � � yir� . y, i H �� 9 _� $ N .�.. -y � p � • 6 ' � � �a ,ofi � �i� j .�. m A N�� ...� y � � � e . � . � ` � O . � N . . . Q ... . . �� ^ ' � I : w -T' - m . 19^ b v . �f I J m :'�' _c�' ..� ` �.._ . _ � ' '. � . � • � .�..' p �� P . . . . �+ f ♦ Z i19� B-_ m,-�A� si , � • � -O-_ N" 4' N. � - N,... ... • 7. � U/ ' � '� �- a C OL "`_ n(� � �4� A M . m m -� ; �.}-'= tr (Q • F .�fOSy 2//0 ' 27 y � I � Yi A' ...u ��.M� �..,• N. . � y/ i�0 . Ito31� •/.o m .. � _� �.�• o�� $ � i. � y Oee o b a�,.oe� z� �-- �,oa r, • � - -�o �-,.. � o ` . 7 � � ��s�, _ _ a �� '�'._ 9 uoY4 � 6 � m . v � �- � . o . s • ( �� s � � ' _ ^ y _ O � N -�� y�'� -0-.:.. zt ya, aoli 1•I - m .... =• ...., m m 2/ ' ��b0 . /J4 - t= � � � �r.°: . . 110'l ' 6 noci ' � 2� d y � . A n.,q ,... �..� . � 0 7 • �?t� ,f..• - . � - _ �-� q � - . , i�a ,iec ..a� �.o , ia" �a,. • .� _ , . . ! � . , o u,�. � � , a .�., . � R � as . 8 % m N ��.,: � � �. . l9t o (ay �// 07/ • i � r� q�l •n - . e... . . . � ,. • `�' , �, � u.�� tO I� � /B //Olb 9 �Y 'sb N i � 'ir0� V ' A ' __� A N - ""�'in ��- . p �. �,.s � . rn ... � �.... �� /7 /0 Z /D � p , ��.., -. ... n .... � . � v � . � • w . Q r . _� m Y � �r. i ( i �. - /6 � �// • �/4 . � V p � JYO R �y� =$. V..� SL•_� �- ' Y VV R- ,.. "N ,.'� �+ . , � � � �. � � � i, „ + u,� •�,,, /�14 � � .,,o ..� � . 1•l ,IL � /i! �'� �.YSC.� sl'', .. �.1_ �p NF 0„ 04 ) fi � � ��[ . . � , .w£hcc S � $ ELMiNJ00 � .. . . ,.' ♦, L � ._� '� t �Y . . � � �1 . . �,�� iiioo S s,fp�� e�-J5'y az . 4 Sy - N� i. fi 8 m p� ��oi � `� $ � �A hi .rn �.� � . )9 ? - o . u l�io- � ..,. .. r �uo1a IV• �. . - III� � iio3. h 1! ,i--� 'ii� � -� � ,` � � • 0 T :� � 1• N ... i M n.$ . . 7! J �,... � . ' i: � �: . ..1r(! luli ' '. �� ' a . sv . � ,. -0 . ��x•r. 7.� . �:. � ?7 ' I �_ . � � 60 � I s w N '� , �11M1 7 { -N1=... . . . V � I' ��i�9 � ai a� � Q a5 e'� :ni��i�m . A-�-w+ � � , p � / i � S � �M ��5;• , 2 �' ; .'d""UL � P�.1. rn .Ill � O ^ � qV� . ` 1 • � � \�� ♦ � . � � , ts 3 0 . - . � ,. .. . � . , a �- ..,.. � � . �n ..., m . ... 13` ' '• : . r .- . .... . ....'. °s ' . ` ' . � . 1Y • � 11 � ' � /11 '�yo � • . M . . . 4'.:' - �1�. .D ll !� b pi� - ,.. ' � ie ?. � �� f/ A � I�57 � � dP 1 � �' � ' ' .. . . � l 5�8 ' ..�. _ i ., : . ' � - p !�3 rnitl. � . � . 1'V Y- . . ' ! � lbd I ,7 i 'n d � , q'IS7 . .� ' . . ' . F . . . • ��ISJ . �lb . . . ., �iad a�S9� �. ' ,ub p �i �i CASE N0. Cu � 5- 0� P : ._ . � , � a.: ,� --,�� _ _ , � . �, �_ I . . _ . r '— � . .. . iK.+ � r�u - ��i �/�� L � — 3i.� _ � . �.� r� � )� �.. . .O - � �.. .. . . » � M ' '�` , j(u 5 �� ie�4n � , � • . , - , . . - 1 °' Q - . � . . . ,, '„ b !J ' o I � . ..:. ,-�,,,q r - , �.. � If ,,,, .'° e� ' ! . , . ' . , . v o � � Ir , � . � �� . �� . . . . a O MYr' � � . . : . 1 . ... .._ - . . ' . � . . Z . 1 - S J . N•� . . . . .. � . _ . m-•• � . T � , . . � � . ' ' . . . t , (� . r,. . . t` .. �j.; < . , . ?/� �, rinrqMG ii . . . . . . � . l t �� / !n . . / .�A . � . .. � . . - . ' . . � � � . . 1 .(Ll [ � U � � � � a'.' � � Q �' � . . . , / � �� s � ' e . . JJ ' �_'__ . . . � , . . . /� Q O :. O . . . ' , • . . \� £IT E PL/�f`� Q � '� . � � �� . �.i ..� . . . , . . � � . ' . . - " , .. . - � ' � �� .. - � . �----- 2�►$' ; _ ��.. . . . . . . . , �• � ,�L BARCO, 1vIARISCOS ` �:�� P �'� � ; � .. • � _ -�- x �� . � x . � . • , ; '�" �� ..` _ . �' �T �-G�I�-Tbl� . ' L AR � . * E B CO MARISCOS _, ity ,� . . . . •,_,; . s t - . , . � �• " •' �� 1 ATLANTIC � $LVD. LYNWOOD CA� � - �- � � � � - RESOLUTION NO. 2548 � _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMZT CASE N0.- 95-06 TO PERMIT THE SALE OF BEER AND WINE IN THE C-3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL) ZONE, , 11098 ATLANTIC AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission �of the City of Lynwood, pursuant to law, on May 9, 1995 held a public hearing on the . subject application; and WHBREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered all i pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and. WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that ' the proposal,is exempt from the provisions of the California Enivronmental Quality Act, per State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 . . b('3) as amended; and � WHEREAS, the project is consistent with the General Plan in that the subject site is designated "Commercial" on the General Plan Map; and . WHEREAS, the restaurant has been determined to qualify as a. bone fide restaurant andd may sell beer and wine for on site consumption subject to the granting of a Conditional Use Permit; � therefore Section 1. The Planning Commission'hereby finds and determines as follows: A. That the'granting_ of the proposed Conditional Use Permit' will not adversely affect the General Plan. , B. That the.proposed location of the Conditional Use is in : accord with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the purpose of the zone in which the site is located. C. That the proposed location of the Conditional Use and the conditions under' which it would be operated or maintained will not be�detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare,. or materially injurious to properties or ° improvements in the vicinity; D. The proposal is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidel'ines, as amended. Section 2. The following Conditions of Approval shall pertain , to Conditional Use Permit No. 95-06. , COMMUNZTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1, The proposed development shall comply with all applicable ' . regulations of the Lynwood Municipal code, the Uniform Buildinq � Code and the Uniform Fire Code. 2._ Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, for review. This conditional use permit shall apply exclusively to the subject . restaurant. 1 3. The applicant, or his representative,. shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to the conditions stated herein before any building permits are issued. „ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 4. Access to restroom facilities shall be provided. Restrooms should be signed and well lighted. 5. Loading/unloading adjacent the parking area for the restaurant , must be provided. 6.. A siqnage plan must be submitted for Redevelopment Division , approval, prior. to installation, or modification,of signs. 7. The proponent shall not post or maintain any signage visible ,-,- from the public right-of-way advertising brands of alcoholic beverages offered for sale on the premises. � 8. Alcoholic beverages shall not be offered for off-site � consumption. ;9. If other than beer and wine is to be sold, another Conditional Use Permit'approval is required by the Planning Commission.� 10. The Building Department shall examine the bathroom facilities to assure that they fully conform to all applicable codes and standards. � , .11. No beer or wine shall be sold after 10 p.m. 12. This application shall be subject to yearly review by the - Redevelopment Agency. PLANNING DIVISION • 13. This permit shall become void in one hundred twenty (120) days,. unless extended, after the use permitted has been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised. 14. Where-vehicles are to be parked immediately adjacent to a public or private street or alley, a decorative masonry wall. � (maximum of thirty-six inches in.height measured from the • finished surface of the parking area) or bermed, shrub and • ground cover shall be pr,ovided. If a wa13 is provided, there must be sufficient ,landscaping to screen wall from street view " , and accessibility. PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS No conditions at this time. . - FIRE DEPARTMENT No conditions at this time. � 2 Section 3: A copy of this Resolution No. 2548 shall be delivered to the applicant. . , APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 9th May 1995 by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: ' AYES: � NOES: - �ABSENT: ' ABSTAIN: . Carlton McMiller � Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gary Chicots, Director Michele Beal Bagneris ` Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney . 3 !:'� �» DATE: May 9� 1995 rn'� ITEM N0 � T0: . PLANNING CONIMISSION �� " � � 'YO. � , .. ��1� FROM: Gary Chicots, Director Community Development Department BY: Robert Diplock, Planning Manager Planning Division SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Case No CUP 95-07 Applicant: Henry Oh PROPOSAL• The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit in order to develop four (4) residential dwelling units, with an attached two (2) car garage for each unit at 11827 Wright Road, in the R-3 (Multi-family Residential) zone. FACTS: 1. Source of Authoritv Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained for any residential development in the R-2 and R-3 (Residential) zones. 2. Pronerty Location The site is located on the west side of Wright Road between Josephine and Lavina Avenues (see�attached location map). 3. Propertv size The site consists of a rectangular shaped 1'ot approximately 13,768 square feet in size. 4. Existina Land Use The property is vacant and undeveloped. The surrounding land uses are as follows: � North - Single Family South - Multi-Family East - Single Family - west - Multi-Family ; 5. General Plan and Zonincx Desianations i The General Plan Designation for the subject property is Town House and Cluster Housing. The surrounding land use ; designations are"as follows: General Plan . Zoning North - Townhouse Cluster Housing North - R-3 � South - Townhouse and Cluster Housing South - R-� East - Townhouse and Cluster Housing East - R-3 , West - Townhouse and Cluster Housing West - R-3 � I 6. Proiect Characteristics• ; The applicant proposes to develop four (4) residential ' dwelling units with attached two (s) car garages. On the first floor, each unit will have a two (2) car garage and a 445 sq.ft. storage area. This portion of the proposal is' ; designed to address flood control regulations. The second floor will contain three bedrooms, two batns, a kitchen, � dining room, and living rooms. At least 25� of the development will be landscaped. i i 1 I � . ' 7. Site Plan Review On April 26, 1995, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated ' the proposed development and recommended approval to the Planning Commission, subject to specific conditions and requirements. 8. ZoninQ Enforcement Historv None of record. 9. Public Response None of record at the time this report was prepared. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS 1. Consistency with General Plan _ The proposed land use is consistent with the existing General Plan designation of Town House and Cluster Housing. Therefore, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 95-07 will. not adversely affect the General Plan. 2. Site Suitabilitv The subject property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development relative to the proposed density, bulk of the structures, parking, walls, fences, driveways, and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, the subject property is adequately served with the required public utilities and offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility. 3. Comoliance with Develonment Standards The proposed development meets all _the development standards required by the Zoning Ordinance regarding off-street _ parking, front, and rear yard setbacks, lot coverage, height, unit size, and density. 4. Comoatibilitv The proposed project will be located in a neighborhood that ' is in substantial transition from single-family to multi- j family residences. However, properties located to the ; south, 'east and west are developed-as Multi-Family � Residential. ' 5. Conditions of Annroval � ° i The proposed project, subject to the conditions recommended ' by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative . � effect on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or ' welfare. 6. Benefits to Communitv I The proposed development will add to the City's affordable housing stock in furtherance of the policies of the Iiousing Element of the General Plan. � i 7. Environmental Assessment j � i The Community Development Department Staff has determined � that the project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15061 B(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality � � Act as amended. I ; f\planning\staffrpt\f:cup9507 . _ � i i 2 i I __ i . ' RECOMMENDATION: • Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2547: 1. Certifying that the project is Categorically Exempt from the provision of the California Environmental Quality Act per State CEQA Guidelines as under Section 15061 b(3). 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 95-07, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Resolution No.2547 , 3. Site Plan � i f:\staffrpt\cup9507 � � i . 3 ' � �......__ _ - . - ._......-�:�.� __.....--..._ LOCATION iVIAP 'mCITY. ?iu..��p �v_ , -n H � � x.s �u�n n�.. �. , A J c� ,� ,�., >,.; , e '�... a � y m � � t� , Q� ,� ,... • q " 4 ^� �� . -.� �Yf ifi , N � � 3 N' 2 � ... r b Z II�tuN � .p � N . �.�� N ' �p 10\f • V �� ♦ p� � � p 1�• Q � a Y PORT/O. ., — MI•• � n 'd�t' $ m � r �ns� Q � � � — T M JOSEPHINE' '' ti' � ti � : i , � - �'�� _ �r � '• t - ,�aoa � S $ , � �. ^ ' ` -+. . � , � p ieor ,� eo� ~ S I a � � � e�e " � ^ ^ . � . N v ��e�' _ �ume .� , � �rsos +' ` . • i�e�. � „u. 2 • �b!.;� � . W � �.. w � . �insi n�n W�ner� fi � iien' a )1 1J 1) }I 1f i[ /71 ��' ! II ti �ut � „ew � Z ' ne�. �n „ s.t' Q � . ' W . 'nna � _ „m� . �i�i� '� �IOtY 11�11 M�\� / p �1� � 3 �Y�. � �'; iati � L M ew � 3 a �,�� 1 e�o '�� . ` ilsr iiea� � ' lie � 'I1 ' 1� ; ueq � � �efo �' � '� e�s neN v , . nYa. h v�• ne» � t � o••° ` M v • VHI �` A. tle» � ti �i•.. a � ��.s•� . nw� �es� j ;;;,: , ' I�nw Y� M q n �ueH 0 : • ;. � V V 'nN0 � uMl. � WN. � eCl . . �ibff � . + IW1 ,• � �IN• � u1�i . Ib�4 � j:'�.�� rs+n . v -' � � Z IUy � ' new � � ��•� iro�+ � �.. � � v II OM` � II�N ~ I M r �ti�� ` : nAS� N �� y I• I 0 ___ _ �. � II��• , ! , �.. ueae n ^ �'^. i ' iw� - -- - ��..� '� .. . � _ � •,{ � � i � ♦ : ; . LAVINIA �at t ,"" :�°°, j ;:::;, . ' .^�"�� F 4 7 � IY�� j �: x � y y r• l .. t ` 7 j �v�y ti �� _ i: � R i ' i '• � +!1 'GIt . � t � � S • • 3 0 M� � y� i�nr � �: I " !/ �! J i � � f � .t i' �.a�� ' � .. � • y ..��. � �u�s t !7 I/ II SI7 ^ � F ��a� � nu• � �k tp`. � Y-r. , i� � �' $ '.�. � � .,�.� . ' 3 0 � � ; _ � a i � � � • /l %�+ /I � � C � ��t. , i � ST /t /f �� t - , Il � ` �4N. ;:: V i ��Mf1 � '>_ F,.' i�� s �u g � + �� ' NILAND S S � ,,,.,, ;';> � - .. ._ ., . .. .. ,. • � p • ,... . . I . I S � S�D {� ` �.�.� . .. , J � � _� ' ' � SG�LE' i . � ... CASE NOJ �_d � , , vP ; , _� � � i RESOLUTION N0. 2547 � � A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-07 (CUP 95-07) TO DEVELOP.FOUR (4) RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS WITH ATTACHED TWO (2) CAR GARAGES FOR EACH UNIT AT 11827 WRIGHT ROAD IN THE R-3 (MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, on May 9, 1995 conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15303b of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended; and WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for residential development in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone; therefor Section 1. Tkie Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Official Zoning Ordinance. B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, , will not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger ' • the public health, safety, or welfare. i C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current zoning regulations and site plan submitted and approved � , by the Site Plan Review conmittee. ' D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. E. The proposed development will add to the City's affordable housing stock in accord with the policies of tfie Housing Element of the General Plan. Section 2. The Planninq Commission of the City of Lynwood, ' based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby � approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 95-07, provided the � following conditions are observed and complied with at all times: � � f:reso2547 � � � 1 � COMM[JNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building Code and the Fire Code and be in substantial compliance with plans on file with the Community Development Department. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, for review of said modifications. 3. The app3icant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. 4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance of any building permits. 5. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one hundred and twenty (120) days after the use permitted has been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised. PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS 6. All work shall be performed by a licensed contractor as per plans, specifications and current codes. 7. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving the proposed deyelopment. 8. Construction shall commence within (6) months from date of issuance of building permits. 9. Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25$) i percent of the lot area. 10. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the ! Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. ! The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs. combined with ground cover as fo�lows: One (1) five (5) gallon shrub for each 100 square feet of landscaped area; and two (2) fifteen gallon trees for each 500 square feet of landscaped areas. � 11. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped and shall consist predominately of plant materials except for necessary walks, drives and fences. ' 12. A minimum two (2) car garage shall be provided for each dwelling. A total of four garage parking spaces shall be provided. 13. A six (6') foot high block wall shall be installed along the I perimeter of the property, except within the twenty (20') foot front yard setback. In this setback, if built, the wall shall not exceed a height of four (4') feet measured from top of curb. , 14. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet. t\planning\reso\f:reso2547 ' . ; Z " 15. Final building elevations, including materials of construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the Building Official and the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. . 16. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer shall pay $1.72 per square foot for residential buildings to the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government Code Section 53080. 17. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved. 18. 'Acoustical construction materials•shall be used throughout the units to mitigate freeway noise to the standards and satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. 19. The roof shall be constructed with non-reflective material including synthetic tile, clay tile roofing or concrete tile and/or other similar roofing material that is not reflective, glossy, or polished and/or rolled-form type metal roofing subject to the review and approval of the Building Official. 19a. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar �� material other than the reflective glossy, polished and/or � rolled-formed type metal siding. i 20. Prior to obtainin a buildin I 9 g permit, the design of any I exterior elevation changes to the building must be approved by the Director of Community Development or his/her � designee. . � 21. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in I , a consistent manner, including the• incorporation within the � ° side and rear building elevations of some or all of the � design elements used for the primary (front) facades. � 22. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally � compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent � building. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc. I shall be installed without the prior written approval of the I Director of Community Development. � 23. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment,, i swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical devices shall be located within the rear yard or side yards. � Such equipment shall be screened from surrounding properties ; and streets and operated'so that they do not disturb the I peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring residents, in accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance. � i I 24. A cover sheet of approved conditions must be attached to � plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety Division. 25. The owner of the site shall maintain a pro-active approach to the elimination of graffiti frdm the structures, fences and accessory buildings, on a�aily basis. 26. For the purpose of providing heating for any dwelling I proposed, only an energy efficient forced air furnace shall i be used, and the use of any wall furnace is expressly • i prohibited. ! � i f\p�anning\reso\f:reso2547 � ' � I I I 3 ' � ' i � PUBLIC WORKS ENGZNEERING DEPARTMENT 27. Provide documentation that lots composing the property were legally tied together to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. After reviewing the documents, the Department of Public Works may reguire the submission and recordation of a parcel map or lot merger. 28. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered ' Civil Engineer. Property is located within 100 year flood level zone per flood boundary map. Also conform to all applicable codes per section 15 of the Lynwood Municipal , Code. Building above flood level will require substantial amount of fill, therefore, suggest alternative methods of design to minimize amount of livable space at ground level. F1ood Elevation = 82.0'. 29. Construct five (5) foot wide sidewalk along Wright Road. 30. Close existing drive approach and construct proposed drive approach(es) per APwA 110.0 along Wright Road. 31. Construct two (2) wheelchair ramp(s). Location shall be determined by the Public Works Department. 32. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected separately. Construct laterals as.necessary. 33. Install four (4) 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood � standards along wright Road. i ' 34. Regrade parkway and landscape w'ith grass. I ;35. Provide and install two (2) marbelite street poles with � light fixture, underground services and conduits along � Wright Road (as determined by the Department of Public Works I and Engineering). ; 36. Underground all utilities. ; i 37. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all '. off-site `improvements. i 38. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The I work shall be performed by a lic.ensed contractor hired by the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the ' Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any I work. '• � . 39. Cannot build powder room/water heating/laundry room in storage/utility room (including washer/dryer). + � 40. Comply with all flood zone ordinance requirements i.e. i electrical meters etc. above flood zone, openings in bottom floor for water to pass through, etc. FIRE DEPARTMENT ! The Fire Department found no cause to establish conditions for � this application. , � ,� i i planning\reso\f:reso2547 � � ' I 4 I i � i . I I . ,� Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the applicant. � APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1995, ' by members of the Planninq Commission voting as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ' � Carlton McMiller, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: I Gary C. Chicots, Director Michele Beal Bagneris . I Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney i i � . � I ( f:\resolu[n:resd547 . • I ' .� I i � I � � ' i I I I - � � � i . f � . , .. , . . ; , 5 - � j i i � . . . , , � .- � � ' � �: �,c��,� �� N0. 8 'DATE: May 9 , 1995 (� �`� � ' � � / Q�� . , l�i'ic'�. i`F�. _SZ�,,;�/.��V T0: PLANNING COMMISSION � �-�- ' FROM: ` Gary Chicots, Director ` 1/ - Community Development Department � l/� , °. SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment - Case No. GPA 95-02 � Applicant: City of Lynwood' _ � PROPOSAL: �.• � The City of Lynwood is requesting approval of a General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan designation from Townhouse and Cluster Housing to Public Facility for a parcel of approximately 33,000 sq. ft. on th'e southwest corner of the intersection of Birch Street and Mulford Avenue in order to perinit the replacement of an existing youth center with a new and expanded facility. FACTS: " 1:. Proiect Characteristics: - . The proposed General Plan Amendment is designed to permit the, - , future construction.of a 7000 sq.ft. Youth Center. The Center will house the functions currently provided at the site in the ' . 1500 sq.ft. Teen Resource Center, .plus the activities now ' housed in the Activity Center on Imperial'Highway. The' . facility will include a health and fitness area, class and . meeting rooms. A 2800 sq.ft. outdoor activ.ity area plus parking is also planned. , � - This facility will replace three structures currently on the site -- a grounds maintenance warehouse, a teen resource center and a small building used by the School District. The property is currently o•wned.by the City. 2. Source of Authoritv: Section 65358(a) of the State Plan�ing and Zoning Law states. that "..if it deems it to be in the public interest, the . , legislative body may amend ail or part of the adopted General Plan." • � 3.. Property Location and Size: � The subject property is located on the southwest corner of the ' intersection of Mulford Avenue and Birch Street, diagonally ` across from Dymally Park. It is irregular in shape and contains a total area of approximately 33,000 sq. ft. 4. Existina Land Use: : The surrounding land uses are as follows: North - single family residential ` ° South - single family residential " � , East - single family residential, DymaJ�y Park ' West - multi family residencial _ . � 5. Current General Plan and Zoninct'Desianations• ' . I The General Plan Desi nation for the sub'ect j 5 7 property is , Townhouse and Cluster Housing while the Zoning Glassification � is R-3 (Multiple Family): The surrounding land �use ° � designations are as follows: i� _ I � ; j . i . 'I , ; i . � f� ^ . . � . . � � . . General Plan Zonina ' North - Townhouse and.Cluster R-3 ' Housing • South -. Townhouse and Cluster R-3 Housing .' East - Sinqle-Family Residential g_2 � West - Townhouse and Cluster R-3 „ Housing 6. Zonina Enforcement Historv• No problems within the last few years. ° 7. Publie'Resoonse: • None of record at ttie time this report' was prepared. I8SUE5 AND ANALYSIS • � The City has competed for and' won an allocation' of $640,000 from Proposition A funds (Safer Neighborhoods and Gang Prevention , Programs) 'to provide an expanded Youth Activities Center. The .. building_ now housing the City's Activity Center will not be available after October. A new facility has been planned for several years. . A number� of different sites have been evaluated, and the current - site has been selected. However, the GeneraI Plan does not ° designate this site for community facility use. ' The basic issue -in deciding on the merits of a General Plan � Amendment is whether or not this is an appropriate location for the _ facility. , Site Advantages: ;; 1. Property owned by City • 2'. Centrally located ' 3. Adjacent to park and other recreation facilities' 4. Eairly 2arge site 5. Similar type of use currently existing on site , 6. Close to Junior High School 7. Served by transit , Disadvantages: ". I, ; ; ' I l. adjacent to residential development on two sides, and ^ residential development across the street 2. relatively poor access ; 3. access roads are narrow i All in all, the site appears to be a good one for the proposed facility and ties in with adjacent uses. Possible impact on the • � neighboring residential uses can be minimized through proper design, i . and'scree'ning. � i , � 'i Communitv Impact ,� +. ; The General Plan Amendment will not have'a negative effect on the i values of.the surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger � � . the public health, safety or welfare'. The new structure'on this `site will have a beneficial effect on the area since it will . replace a warehouse building and two older residences. • . . � i � However, any structure on the property must be�carefully sited and � . � 2 I , - � i . i . . I � '1 designed to minimize impacts on the neighboring residential uses. 'Zoninq regulations require a six ,foot block wall and 20 ft. setbacks to separate the community facility use from adjacent residential uses. In addition, the structure and outdoor use area ' can be located as far away from the neighbors as possible and any , structure can be designed to look like a residential building rather than a school or commercial structure. Several of the , - architects being considered for project design have mentioned the .need to make the building fit into the neighborhood. These . ' . recommendations will be transmitted.to the architect firm that is . �selected' for the project and rev.iewed during site plan review. Benefits to Communitv . The proposed General Plan Amendment will allow the preservation and expansion of education and social services to teenagers and.other - , members of the community. Environmental Assessment - The Director of Community Development has determined that no , , substantial environment impact will result -from the proposed General Plan Amendment. It will permit the replacement of similar , existing facilities. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been filed in the Community Development Department and.in the�Office of ,. the City Clerk. � RECOMMENDATIONd Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning ,- Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2550: � • 1. Certifying that the project will not have a significant : effect on the environment and approving the Negative `, Declaration, pursuant to the provisions of State CEQA I ; , Guidelines. � ' , 2. Approving General Plan Amendment 95-02 and recommending i City Council adoption of the General Plan Amendment. i . , I ° Attachments { . . � � 1. Location' Map ; 2. Resolution No. 2550 � � ,' 3. Project Description ' - 4. Conceptual Plan for Youth Center . • ( ; �' � . .' � , _ , . _� , I . , , � , , I , i � 'f:,\wptiles\9P�502.rpT . � � � . � . �� .� . - , � � � � . . . �� . . � � 3. . i � , � _ � i - � . � I I - I I l,�v . ' • �, . ; �� /�t�l/�ER/.4 L H w v. �o � S� F . � ,o�.o� , ao Rq �� = yp � 16Z 161 j 160 159 158 157 156 ISS ' �' 'SP . 186 187 ' 188 IS� 190 191 �92 �93 nz `" -1 . . . . I �� A . . F)VE• ;',_� � �oo . i � / � � — � —,_ P, � 1 �; �o3a zoz zoi zc� �� 9� i�6 �9s � `_' `— - �� ,. `li � (�YiVir�, L L � _ � ' PARK f j69 270 Z71 ZIZ Z73 Z14 275 Z76� D7 i � � . � 1 _ .SA.N�90RN fiVE u j � � ! i tes. . ° 285 2ee 283 t82 Zti r 28o L YN W O O O � , � � � � �� 15 346 347 348 349 35a 5► 352 _ 359 �� - � Ml1GFQRO AvE� ,� Subj� S � , ' 9S4 �\._ " ' _ z j6i 360 359 �5� 57 j56 355 '' -- �.. -—, __ 6J � � . � y 100 �� // �9 470 d1.1. l7Z 413 l4 415 416 g ll�T �� Itoj P� q T l/9f ��,� ! PL A ' l�V� . � v � �ICW /10 �� ` I ' l87 � �ti6' � "�6 /I07 � � i � 49�1 d89, �8d� /7 /109 4 ' +�' 4Af g /1�7 /?j5 �� 11/0 /Il/ i �Ijj 11j1 le5 � Q !n �I,� � k, N 113/ l?jp 1119 /`° I �i � g � Q � �1i7 Iej � � I � . � /74I /Z4f �: � , ��o �3 Q Idl /140 � y l�j !?64 w � � 481 � 1Z49 , �p47 @ I765 116G �Op 4p �� /l�j " � �zs� �� /761 /I60 •" I ' � ,� /jfj � 3? l76/ ►� ' � ft � /159 / ( N gi3 , �j iI� Q 3 g S� $ w ti Iff /t � c�', �" � _ f12 . fl/ � � /I� J / ;tt,� � � � = I �,� Q . . /� h aa I 5tr r 5i6 � _ j � � !ili r�� . � � ' ' RESOLUTION NO. 2550 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION.OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ' y RECOMMENDING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LYNWOOD GENERAL PLAN (GPA 95- ' _.. 02) TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF BIRCH STREET AND MULFORD AVENUE ' FROM TOWNHOUSE AND CLUSTER HOUSIPIG TO PUBLIC FACZLITY ' WHEREAS,. the Planning Commission•,of the City of Lynwood, pursuant to law, on May 09, 1995 held a public hearing on the , subject application; and � WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered all ' pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and " wHEREAS, the Commission has determined that community facility - , use of this property would be consistent with the� goals and • policies of the General Plan; and : WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development has determined that the proposal will not have a negative effect on the environment, and has thereby declared a Negative Declaration for the project; therefore , • Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood ' hereby finds and determines as follows: A. A Public Facility designation of this property would be a compatible with surrounding land use. •_ B. The subject site would accommodate proposed development - due to its size, location; and proximity to other public uses. " C. The General Plan Amendment to Public Facility would be. ; ;.consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. D. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not be detrimental to the properties surrounding the site. , Section 2. Based on the -Initial Study prepared for this ' project, the Planning,Commission has determined that there will be no significant adverse impacts on the environment and therefore, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, approves the Negative Declaration. , n . Section 3. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood; ' based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby ' approves General Plan Amendment Case No. GPA 95-02, and recommends ' City Council adoption of a resolution changing the General Plan map designation for this property from Townhouse and Cluster Housing to Pub1iC Facility. , • Section 3. A copy of this resolution sha11 be delivered to the City Clerk. ^ ' � APPROVED and ADOPTED this 9th day of May.,.1995 by members the • Planning Commission votinq as follows: AYES: . NOES :� • . ,. ABSENT: � . . ABSTAIN: , Carlton McMiller, Chairperson � 1 `. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gary Chicots, Director � Michele Beal Bagneris, ' Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney _ f:\wpfiles\gpa9502.res - z . LYNWOOD YOUTH CENTER PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Lynwood Youth Center will be a new 7000 S.F, building on an approximately 33,000 S.F. lot located at I 1409 [3irch Street. 7'he building will be designed and built to house various activities. The facility will include health and fitness area, class and meeting rooms, and of£ces. The health and fitness section will be designed as a multi-functional area for severel different activities such as Boxing, Aerobica, Karate, and other group exercises. The class roome and mceting room� will ba multi-tLnctionel aa wall; They will be uaed for Computer Classes, Group Counseling, Homework Help, Diet & Nutrition Classes and other activities that need a class room setting, OtFces will be utilized for one to one counseling sessions - as well general use by the staff. The facility will be designed and built so that it can accommodate any activity for "At Risk Youth" target group not envisioned at the present time. `>?' ,�,,. ,. � �,. �. ',>;' . R , . . , � , . . . .__._._ .. I M�1LF�� Av�NU , � �� . �.\ . . _. .. . , , . . �.'. , � ' •,•. . z � . - �----- . � . . _ , , [�r - . , , , ,� � . .. . � , ,. . .. . . � , _ , . . � _____.._. . � , . i � ---_ _ , � �� l�� __. _ .N�.,�. �� . -__._-_ ----=- .; .p�. �� <� . � . � ,'O ,��\ . . , , . , . . . , � � �� . , . . , . _... . . . '. , `__ -� �..� . . : ._ --.'—� ' ' PARKING LOT .' � � .• ., .'� � . •�.' .'� � � � -� . I — -- SIDE WALK , :.. � .. � __. -•--- . , � . P � . .,., .� „' A � . � . : � ss. � � � � � � . � � � � � • � � � ' • . -i� �t ;� �' �� f ' •'J m � � , OUTDOO F " , . � !�, � � I acrwiTies � � 9 UILpINt,� �OOQ�SQ FT'� � .I � � � 2800 SQ FT �` ' � ` � , z � � � vv �' ' . ' ' � - - _ _ � _ .�� . . CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR LYNWOOD YOUTH CENTER ' SUBJECf fQ, CI IANGE A� FIN/1L UESI(�N . SCALE 1 "=30' a:' - i , ?H: � _ ;; �� ,a . ' �' - i �� ... ;�`� i.1' �^.. '. i r... . .I i. '' !, ' � � 1�1 �C ��' . L`� \' �., ! �".�. � - DATE: May 9, 1995 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Gary Chicots, Director /�/�,�' Community Development Department�� Y. SUBJECT: Zone Chanue Case No ZC 95-01 11405-09 Birch Street Applicant: City of Lynwood � � PROPOSAL: • The City of Lynwood is requesting approval of a Zone Change (ZC 95- O1) to change the zoning of City owned property on the southwest corner of the intersection of Birch Street and Mulford Avenue (11405-09 Birch Street) from R-3 (Multiple Family) to CF (Community Facility) in order to permit the replacement of an existing youth center with a new and expanded facility. FACTS: l. Proiect Characteristics• The proposed Zone Change is designed to facilitate the future construction of a 7000 sq.ft. Youth Center on the subject � property. The Center will house the functions currently i provided at this site in the 1500 sq.ft. Teen Resource Center, plus the activities now housed in the Activity Center on Imperial Hiqhway. The facility will include a health and fitness area, class and meeting rooms. A 2800 sq.ft. outdoor activity area plus parking is also.planned. This facility will replace three structures currently on the I site - a grounds maintenance warehouse, a teen resource �) center and a small house used by the School District. The property is currently owned by the City. � I 2. Source'of Authoritv• i Section 65358(a) of the State Planning and Zoning Law states that "...if it deems it to be in the public interest, the I leqislative body may amend all or part of the adopted Gener..3l Plan." ' I 3. Propertv Location and Size• I The subject property is located on the southwest corner ot � I intersection of Mulford Avenue and Birch Street, diagonal I across from Dymally Park. It is irregular in shape ,n, contains a total area of approximately 33,000 sq. ft. 4. Existina Land Use• j i The surrounding land uses are as follows: � North - residential ! South - residential � East - Single-Family, Dymally Park I West - Multi-Family , 5. Current General Plan and Zonina Desi4nations• ' The current General Plan Designation for the subject property I I is Townhouse and Cluster Housing. This designation is being I proposed for change to Public Facility under General Plan � Amendment GPA 95-02. The Zoning Classification on the I property is R-3 (MUltiple Family). The surroundinq Plan and Zoning designat,-ions are: • i 1 ' � " I � • ' I . ,.. �� General Plan - Zoninp North - Townhouse and Cluster • R-3 Housing South - Townhouse and Cluster R-3 Housing East - Single-Family Residential R-2 West - Townhouse and Cluster R-3 Housinq 6. Zonincr Enforcement Historv• No problems within the last few years. 7. Public Response: None of record at the time this repor.t was prepared. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS " The City has competed for and won an ailocation of $640,000 from Proposition A funds (Safer Neighborhoods and Gang Prevention I Programs) to provide an expanded Youth. Activities Center. The building now housing the City's Activity Center will not be . available after October. A new facility has been planned for � several years. i A number of different sites have been evaluated, and the current site has been selected. However, the General Plan does not ' designate this site for community facility use. A General Plan i . Amendment (GPA 95-02) is being processed concurrently to ;redesignate this property as Public Facility. If the General Plan ; Amendment is approved, then the zoning designation should also be ( changed to bring the zoninq into conformity with the Plan. i Staff is recommending approval of the related General Plan � Amendment. � � Communitv Zmoact . ! The Zone Change will not have a neqative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public � health, safety or welfare. The' new structure on this site will have a beneficial effect on the area�since it will replace a � warehouse building and two older residences. I However, any structure on the property must be carefully sited and � designed to minimize impacts on the neighboring residential uses. � The Zoning Ordinance requires a six foot block wall separating the I community facility use from adjacent residential uses. Zn j addition, the structure and outdoor use area should be placed as � far away from the neighbors as possible and the structure should be designed to look like a residential building rather than a school I or commercial structure. Several of the architects being considered for the project.have mentioned the need to make the building fit into the neighborhood. These recommendations will be transmitted to the architect firm that is selected and checked as part of site i plan review. • I Benefits to Communitv , I The proposed General Plan Amendment will allow the preservation and i expansion of education and social services to teenagers and other I members of the community. i . i 2 ( � . � � I . �` . Environmental Assessment The Director of Community Development has determined that no' � substantial environment impact will result from the proposed�Zone Chanqe. It will permit the replacement of similar existing facilities. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been filed in the Community Development Department and in the Office of the City Clerk. RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2551: 1. Certifying that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Negative Declaration has been issued pursuant to t�e provisions of State CEQA Guidelines. 2. Approving Zone Change 95-01 and recommending City Council approval of the Zone Change. Attachments ` , i l. Location Map i 2. Resolution No. 2551 � 3. Project Description I 4. Conceptual Plan for Youth Center . � I , I � I I � � i � _ ' � _ _ I •� I - I . � f:\wpfiles\gpa9502.rpt I I i - ; 3 � I � ,. /��1/�ER/AL H.wY: 5o S F . — � ,�o, � � y '�'�'�'c/S ; i6z �si � �60 �59 i�s is� i56 i55 � ? . � � j 186 IS7 188 I$� 190 191 19Z 193 zz1 y I �� 14VE• ; '� �a� . �Sy 7e � ` I�-_ �4 to3 �oZ Zol zoo i9� i9� i9� ��6 i9S i ` - �� `L i p Y�,l%i f'\ � L`r _ � � PA R K �8 1�9 no Zii rIz t73 va t�5 2�6 n7 i , � SANBORN FaVE � i � � � � 1 j� tes 2B5 2ee 2e3 tsz tni 28o LVNWOOD � � , , � �� i 45 j46 j47 j48 349 isa 5► 3SZ - j5j �� , i MlJLFORD i�VE � Subf� S�9 � , j � �`,_` _ . _' --_ I �t j61 360 35� 35� 57 j55 355 �'� �'�- __� bf �° � i � y Z00 �� I 59 410 dll l72 d1; 14 475 _ 416 �// //97 �� g PC A T //� ll9f �� j PL a HV� I l81 y . . v rl � iIG14 � /`�� E 90 !89 /86,� , ,b �107 /IOB 1I09 I '�' 4R! �t�1 /1j5 , ilro lIi l��q � ?jj � � O . �n � � !l�q� �,UT /�jI /li/ j� �7� / /Z � �7 � � 8 � v +IA� /Ijl 14j /l4I � � � �� Q IDl 1140 I �f 2l6 y�� w � 114g� : / @ j � l?65 /166 a .0 4d1 V 241 �Op �l /IIj � � ��5� � 176I , � rt48 �Z6o .: y , � / �Ift �� ? 116/ �� ) 8 yli , j �� , � 5� $ flt 1� � Iff � /I v 8 I�Z o fl/ S� �1� Q . �� S �� • �1�6 � SZ� If 40 Sr� R 5�6 � � � � /jk %it �. /�rr. . ._ _ ' , RESOLUTION N0. 2551 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING ZONE CHANGE ZC 95-01, A CHANGE OF THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF BZRCH STREET AND MULFORD AVENUE, KNOWN AS 11405 AND 11409 BIRCH STREET FROM R-3 (MULTIPLE FAMILY) TO CF (COMMUNITY FACILITY) AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE CHANGE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, pursuant to law, on May 09, 1995 held a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and wHEREAS, the Commission has determined that community facility use of this property would be consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Commission has determined that the CF (Community Facility) Zone is consistent with the land use designation of this property on the General P1an; and I WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development has determined I that the proposal will not have a negative effect on the environment, and has thereby declared a Negative Declaration for � the project; therefore � j Section 1. The Planninq Conmission of the City of Lynwood ' hereby finds and determines as fo11o•,�s: A. A Community Facility _1?siynation of this property would I be compatible with surroundinq i,�rn.i use. I B. The subject site .uuld accommodate the proposed I development due to its size, :o�;�tion, and proximity to other ' public uses. i i C. The Zone Change to CF•(Community Facility) would be I consistent with the goals, policies and land use designations of I the General Plan. D. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not be I detrimental to the properties surrounding the site. � Section 2. Based on the Initial Study prepared for this I project, the Planning Commission has determined that there will be ' no significant adverse impacts on the environment and therefore, � pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, approves the Negative Declaration. � � � Section 3. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby approves Zone Change Case No. ZC 95-01, and recommends City Council � adoption of an. ordinance changing the zoning category of the � subject property from R-3 (Multiple Family) to CF (Community �Facility). � Section 4. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to � the City Clerk. 1 � i i I APPROVED and ADOPTED this 9th day of May, 1995 by members the ' Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: � Carlton McMiller, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gary Chicots, Director Michele Beal Bagneris, Community Development DePt• Deputy City Attorney I . � � � I � i i I i ' � ' I � � , ; I . j . I f:\wpfiles\pczc9501.res � , i I I . � I i i 2 I i I LYNWUOD YOUTH CENTER PROJCC7' DESCRIP7'IOIV The I.ynwood Youth Ccnter will be s new 7000 S.F, building on an epproximately 33,000 S.F. lot located at 11409 Birch Street. The building will be designed and built to house various activities. The facility will include health and fitness area, class and meeting rooms, and offices. . ' The health and fitness section will be designed as a multi-functional area for several different activities such as Boxing, Aerobics, Kazate, and other group exercises. The class rooms and meeting rooms will be multi-functional as well; They will be used for Computer Classes, Group Counseling, Homework Help, Diet & Nutrition Classes and other activities that need a class room setting, Offices will be utilized for one to one counseling sessions � as well general use by the stafF. The facility will be designed and built so that it can accommodate any activity for "At Risk Youth" target group not envisioned at the present time. I ( I , � � I 1 � i I i � i i ' I • I i � I I • i i .. i I � i I I ,, ' U �� O �� A�ENV�. . M `� ' . �\ . _-- . ., . _, . , .� . ,,, , . .� . . . � r , _ _ .. ... _ , ------- ' , ' �. � � , . . � , _ . _.. .._.._ . , . . � I , ' . _ _._ , � � � � ��. _ _.. . � . , , , • � � ,. � � �� . � . • . . ___ - ._ ... .....__ � ' • ,�'1 � .' �xn '• '�'° ��',�� "A . . � -- _ - - --- ..._..__ _ , , � . . . •,•. O ��\ . . . . _. _.... __.....__._.... . . , . . . . . . ' ' ' ' � . . . . • . . . . . -. _ .. ___.. -- -- . .. ._. . , . �' _--� �-- � ''�• ,'..' ,' _' ' PARKING LOT � . ; . .'.•. I I .�.��.��.�� I � — -- SIDE WALK . . � I __ _ _. _.._.._ � „ � � I . i' , � y .'„ ) � . � � S � . .. ' . ' . ' � � . ' � . � � � . . . y . , '� '�,.� :.�. :�..� . ' ' .I rn ' OUTDOOR ' '.�� I � � ACTIVITIES 4 ,� BUI�qIN(3 T000 SQ. FT* �, '. � � � I 2800 SQ. FT � � ` F , ' . � ; k I Y ,` i � , t °h., � � j ! Y , LP '�� i I � i . ,. r • . . . � , � ., � � r �. .�� . . . -_ I I CONC�PTUAL PLAN FOR LYNWOOn YOUTH CENTER � SUf3JEC"f TO CFIANGE AT fWAL UESIGN I I SCAI_E 1 "=30' � ; � , � ; � I i ' � �