Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2016-016 Resolution Granting Final Plat Approval for the Enclave at Brockton 6th AdditionMember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION 2016-16 RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR THE ENCLAVE AT BROCKTON 6th ADDITION WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the "City") is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on July 17, 2012, the City adopted resolution 2012-36, which granted preliminary approval to U.S. Home Corporation, a Delaware corporation, (the "Developer") for a plat to be known as "The Enclave at Brockton," which proposed the development of 95 single family parcels and 23 detached townhome parcels; and WHEREAS, on July 17, 2012, the City adopted Ordinance No. 530, which approved of the rezoning of the lands included within the preliminary plat to Planned Unit Development (PUD); and WHEREAS, the Developer proposed to develop the approved preliminary plat in phases; and WHEREAS, on October 2, 2012, the City granted final approval of the plat of The Enclave at Brockton, which constituted the first phase of the project; and WHEREAS, on October 2, 2012, the City also granted final approval of the plat of The Enclave at Brockton 2nd Addition, which included surrounding lands which were also included within the preliminary plat approval and were intended to be replatted as future phases consistent with preliminary plat approval; and WHEREAS, on May 7, 2013, the City granted final approval of the plat of The Enclave at Brockton 3rd Addition; and WHEREAS, on April 15, 2014, the City granted final approval of the plat of The Enclave at Brockton 4th Addition; and WHEREAS, on March 17, 2015, the City granted final approval of the plat of The Enclave at Brockton 5th Addition; and WHEREAS, the Developer is the fee owner of the following legally described property: Outlots F and I, The Enclave at Brockton, Hennepin County, Minnesota and Outlot B, The Enclave at Brockton 5th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (collectively, the "Property"); and Resolution No. 2016-16 March 2, 2016 and WHEREAS, the Developer has requested approval from the City to plat the Property as The Enclave at Brockton 6h Addition, the final phase of the project; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the final plat at the February 16, 2016 meeting; WHEREAS, upon review of the final plat the Council finds that, subject to certain terms and conditions, the plat is substantially consistent with the approved preliminary plat and the terms and conditions thereof, the requirements of the City's subdivision regulations, and the requirements, terms and conditions of the PUD district. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Medina, Minnesota that final approval is hereby granted for the plat of The Enclave at Brockton 64h Addition, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The Developer shall enter into a development agreement satisfactory to the City which shall include the requirements described below as well as other relevant requirements of City ordinance or policy. 2. The Developer shall construct all street, utility, stormwater, sidewalk, grading, and landscaping improvements shown on the plans received by the City on January 13, 2016 and February 5, 2016, except as modified herein. The design of all improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing construction. 3. The Developer shall construct turn lane improvements on Brockton Lane at Basswood Road and Wild Flower Trail in order to serve the development and overlay the portion of Brockton Lane along The Enclave at Brockton when complete. 4. The Developer shall provide a letter of credit prior to any site construction in an amount recommended by the City Engineer to ensure completion of the required improvements. 5. The Developer shall be responsible to reimburse the City for the cost of repairing City streets if they are damaged as a result of hauling materials to the Property during development. 6. The subdivision shall be subject to current City regulations related to lawn and landscaping irrigation. Irrigation systems within the subdivision shall not be connected to the City Water Supply System. The Property is located within the Drinking Water Supply Management Area, so Irrigation Wells shall not be permitted. The Developer shall meet the Public Works Director's requirements with regards to irrigation from the stormwater ponds. 7. The Developer shall dedicate a trail easement to the City over the proposed trail and also pay a park dedication fee of $59,394.80 cash -in -lieu of dedicating additional land within this phase to the City. 8. The construction plans for the various phases of the development shall address all comments and requirements of the City Engineer, City Forester and Fire Marshal. 9. The City Council hereby grants a limited waiver from the 10-foot setback requirement for driveways from a side lot line within this plat. Driveways shall be allowed a minimum 5- Resolution No. 2016-16 2 March 2, 2016 foot setback from one side lot line, but shall be located a minimum of 10 feet from the other side lot line. 10. All comments by the City Attorney related to title issues and recording procedures shall be followed. 11. The Developer shall obtain necessary approvals and permits from the Elm Creek Watershed, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Department of Health and other relevant agencies. 12. This plat shall be recorded within 120 days of the date of this resolution or this approval shall be considered void, unless a written request for a time extension is submitted by the Developer within said 120 days and approved by the City Council for good cause. 13. The Developer shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the costs incurred in the processing and review of this application, construction plans, development agreements, and other relevant documents. Dated: March 2, 2016. Attest: ,/% By: /` Jodi M. gvt llup, City Clerk By: Bob Mitchell, Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Pederson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Anderson, Cousineau, Martin, Mitchell, Pederson And the following voted against same: None Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2016-16 3 March 2, 2016