HomeMy Public PortalAbout10) 7F Staff Report - Approval and Adoption of the 2020 Engineering and Traffic SurveyMANAGEMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
D ATE: May 19, 2020
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Bryan Cook, City Manager
By: Bryan Ariizumi, Public Safety Supervisor
Via: Ali Cayir, City Engineer
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 20-5467 APPROVING THE 2020 TEMPLE
CITY ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY AND RECOMMENDED
SPEED LIMITS
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council is requested to adopt Resolution No. 20-5467 (Attachment “A”)
accepting and approving the 2020 Temple City Engineering and Traffic Survey
(Attachment “B”) and recommended speed limits on various streets within the City of
Temple City.
BACKGROUND:
1.In April 2010, the City’s Traffic Engineer completed an Engineering and Traffic
Survey (Survey) and recommended posted speed limits.
2.On August 3, 2010, the City Council approved and adopted the Survey and
recommended speed limits.
3.On February 5, 2018, Transtech Engineers, Inc. (Transtech) evaluated the City’s
Survey and determined that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions
have occurred on 24 street segments and certified the Survey for an additional two
years.
4.On March 22, 2018, Transtech completed a new Survey on 13 street segments
and recommended speed limits.
5.On September 18, 2018, the City Council approved and adopted the new Survey
on 13 street segments and recommended speed limits.
6.On April 17, 2020, Transtech completed a new Survey on 24 street segments and
AGENDA
ITEM 7.F.
City Council
May 19, 2020
Page 2 of 4
recommended speed limits.
ANALYSIS :
The purpose of an Engineering and Traffic Survey is for the establishment of speed
limits that can be enforced using radar at pre-determined locations. Per the California
Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(CAMUTCD), an Engineering and Traffic Survey can be an enforceable document for a
maximum of 10 years as long as there have not been any significant changes in
roadway or traffic conditions, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property
or land use, roadway width, or traffic volumes. States and local agencies should
conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7 or 10 years, in compliance with
CVC Section 40802 to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their
roadways.
A total of 24 street segments were surveyed as part of the Engineering and Traffic
Survey. These segments were last surveyed in 2010 and recertified in 2018 for a
maximum 10-year life till 2020, therefore a new Engineering and Traffic Survey has
been prepared that summarizes the results of a thorough evaluation of the data
collected and provides recommended speed limits for each street segment surveyed.
Applicable sections of the CVC and CAMUTCD, as read January 1, 2014, with updates
to the CAMUTCD in March 2019 have been followed so that the posted speed limits
can be upheld by the courts and do not constitute a "Speed Trap" as defined by CVC
Section 40802
The list of the street segments were compiled based on the City Wide Engineering and
Traffic Survey adopted in 2010. This Engineering and Traffic Survey does not include
the 13 street segment locations that a new Engineering and Traffic Survey was
completed for in 2018.
Below is a list of the 24 street segments that were included and surveyed as part of the
Engineering and Traffic Survey:
1. Arden Drive between Olive Street and La Rosa Drive
2. Arden Drive between La Rosa Drive and Lower Azusa Road
3. Baldwin Avenue between Longden Avenue and Live Oak Avenue
4. Baldwin Avenue between Live Oak Avenue and Lower Azusa Road
5. Broadway between Eaton Wash and Encinita Avenue
6. Broadway between Encinita Avenue and Baldwin Avenue
7. Camino Real Avenue between Oak Avenue and Temple City Boulevard
8. Daines Drive between Baldwin Avenue and El Monte Avenue
9. Encinita Avenue between Longden Avenue and Las Tunas Drive
10. Freer Street between El Monte Avenue and Santa Anita Avenue
11. Garibaldi Avenue between Rosemead Boulevard and East City Limit
12. Golden West Avenue between Lemon Avenue and Live Oak Avenue
13. Grand Avenue between El Monte Avenue and Santa Anita Avenue
14. Halifax Road between Live Oak Avenue and Lower Azusa Road
City Council
May 19, 2020
Page 3 of 4
15. Las Tunas Drive between Muscatel Avenue and Rosemead Boulevard
16. Las Tunas Drive between Rosemead Boulevard and Rowland Avenue
17. Lemon Avenue between Oak Avenue and Golden West Avenue
18. Lower Azusa Road between Rio Hondo Avenue and Temple City Boulevard
19. Lower Azusa Road between Temple City Boulevard and Baldwin Avenue
20. Lower Azusa Road between Baldwin Avenue and Pal Mal Avenue
21. Santa Anita Avenue between Live Oak Avenue and Grand Avenue
22. Sereno Drive between Rosemead Boulevard and Encinita Avenue
23. Temple City Boulevard between Camino Real Avenue and Las Tunas Drive
24. Temple City Boulevard between Las Tunas Drive and Southern Pacific
Railroad
Based on the Traffic and Engineering Survey results, it was determined that the speed
limits on five street segments are being recommended to have their posted speed limit
reduced by 5 miles per hour from the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph to the
proposed new posted speed limit of 25 mph. The remaining streets will continue to
retain their posted speed limits.
The following segments are being recommended to be reduced by 5 mph from 30 mph
to a new posted speed limit of 25 mph:
• Street Segment #8: Daines Drive between Baldwin Avenue and El Monte
Avenue
• Street Segment #10: Freer Street between El Monte Avenue and Santa
Anita Avenue
• Street Segment #13: Grand Avenue between El Monte Avenue and Santa
Anita Avenue
• Street Segment #14: Halifax Road between Live Oak Avenue and Lower
Azusa Road
• Street Segment #17: Lemon Avenue between Oak Avenue and Golden
West Avenue
CITY STRATEGIC GOALS:
Approval and adoption of the City’s Engineering and Traffic Survey furthers the City’s
Strategic Goal of Good Governance and Public Health and Safety.
FISCAL IMPACT :
VERSION 1: This item does not have an impact on the Fiscal Year (FY) 2019-20 City
Budget. The estimated cost to replace and/or install new posts and signs is approximately
$15,000 and can be completed with funds appropriated in this year’s budget.
City Council
May 19, 2020
Page 4 of 4
VERSION 2: This item does not have an impact on the Fiscal Year (FY) 2019-20 City
Budget. The estimated cost to replace and/or install new posts and signs is approximately
$15,000. The replacement and installation of half of the posts and signs be completed
with funds appropriated in this year’s budget. The replacement and installation of the
remaining posts and signs can be completed with funds appropriated in the Proposed FY
2020-21 City Budget.
VERSION 3: This item does not have an impact of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2019-20 City
Budget. The estimated cost to replace and/or install new posts and signs is approximately
$15,000 and will be included in the Proposed FY 2020-21 City Budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Resolution No. 20-5467
B. Draft City of Temple City 2020 Engineering and Traffic Survey
RESOLUTION NO. 20-5467
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE
CITY APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 2020 ENGINEERING AND
TRAFFIC SURVEY AND RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMITS
WHEREAS, Section 627 of the CVC defines the term engineering and traffic survey and lists the
requirements deemed necessary by the Department of Transportation; and
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Sections 22357 and 22358 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) local
authorities may establish prima facie speed limits on streets and roads under their jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Sections 40801 and 40802 of the CVC an Engineering and Traffic Survey
was conducted to establish prima facie speed limits on streets in the City of Temple City; and
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Section 40802 of the CVC local agencies should conduct engineering
studies at least once every 5, 7 or 10 years to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on streets and roadways
under their jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Traffic Engineer, Transtech, surveyed 24 street segments in the City of Temple
City as part of the City of Temple City 2020 Engineering and Traffic Survey
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DOES RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Approve and adopt the City of Temple City 2020 Engineering and Traffic Survey and
recommended speed limits on various streets within the City of Temple City.
SECTION 2. The posted speed limits on the following segments are to be reduced by 5 mph from
30 mph to 25 mph:
a)Street Segment #8: Daines Drive between Baldwin Avenue and El Monte Avenue
b)Street Segment #10: Freer Street between El Monte Avenue and Santa Anita Avenue
c)Street Segment #13: Grand Avenue between El Monte Avenue and Santa Anita Avenue
d)Street Segment #14: Halifax Road between Live Oak Avenue and Lower Azusa Road
e)Street Segment #17: Lemon Avenue between Oak Avenue and Golden West Avenue
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on this 19th day of May 2020.
______________________________________
Tom Chavez, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________________ _____________________________________
Peggy Kuo, City Clerk Greg Murphy, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT A
Resolution No. 20-5467
Page 2
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution, Resolution No. 20-5467, was duly passed, approved and
adopted by the City Council of the City of Temple City at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of May
2020, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmem ber-
NOES: Councilmember-
ABSENT: Councilmember-
ABSTAIN: Councilmember-
______________________________________
Peggy Kuo, City Clerk
C I T Y O F T E M P L E C I T Y
2 0 2 0 E N G I N E E R I N G A N D T R A F F I C S U R V E Y
C V C S E C T I O N 6 2 7
Adopted by Temple City, City Council
Resolution No. X on X
Prepared By:
Transtech Engineers, Inc.
transtech.org
(909)595-8599
DRAFT COPY
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
City Hall
9701 E Las Tunas Drive
Temple City, CA 91780 DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 2 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
Cover Page 1
Table of Contents 2
Temple City, City Council Adopted Resolution No. X (Adopted X) 3
Preparer’s Certification (Engineer’s Stamp and Signature) 5
Section 1: Introduction 6
Section 2: Overview 10
✓ California Vehicle Code 10
✓ Local Authority to Establish Prima Facie Speed Limits 11
✓ Speed Trap 11
✓ Engineering and Traffic Survey 12
✓ California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices 13
✓ Data Collection 14
✓ Procedures 15
Section 3: Summary of Recommendations 18
✓ Table 1: Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes 18
✓ Segments with Conditions Recommending a Reduction in the Posted Speed Limit 19
✓ Table 2: City of Temple City 2020 Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary 21
Section 4: City of Temple City 2020 Citywide Speed Limit Map (Figure 1) 25
Section 5: Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Forms 26
Section 6: Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Counts 75
Section 7: Radar Calibration 100
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 3 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
INSERT SIGNED ADOPTED
AND APPROVED
RESOLUTION DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 4 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
INSERT SIGNED ADOPTED
AND APPROVED
RESOLUTION DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 5 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
PREPARER’S CERTIFICATION
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CVC SECTION 627
ADOPTED BY TEMPLE CITY, CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION
NO. X ON X
This report was prepared under the supervisions of:
Allen Cayir, PE
Prepared by:
Jana Robbins, PTP, RSP
CERTIFICATION BY ENGINEER
I, Allen Cayir, do hereby certify that the Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Temple City was
performed under my supervision. I certify that I am both experienced in performing surveys of this type
and am duly registered in the State of California as a professional Civil Engineer. The survey has been
conducted in strict compliance with guidelines contained in the California Vehicle Code and the California
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Data contained in this report represents a true and accurate
description of traffic conditions existing on City of Temple City streets.
_______________________________ _______________ __________________________
Allen Cayir, PE Date Professional Engineer’s Stamp
License Type: Civil Engineer
License Number: 47128
Expiration: December 31, 2021
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 6 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION
An Engineering and Traffic Survey has been prepared for 24 street segments in the City of Temple
City. Per the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (CAMUTCD), an Engineering and Traffic Survey can be an enforceable document for a
maximum of 10 years as long as there have not been any significant changes in roadway or traffic
conditions, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway
width, or traffic volumes. States and local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least
once every 5, 7 or 10 years, in compliance with the California Vehicle Code (CVC Section 40802)
to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways.
The 24 street segments included in this Engineering and Traffic Survey document were last
surveyed in 2010 and recertified in 2018 for the maximum 10-year life till 2020, therefore a new
Engineering and Traffic Survey has been prepared that summarizes the results of a thorough
evaluation of the data collected and provides a recommended speed limit for each street
segment surveyed.
The list of the street segments were compiled based on the City Wide Engineering and Traffic
Survey Adopted in 2010. This Engineering and Traffic Survey does not include the 13 street
segment locations that a new Engineering and Traffic Survey was completed for in 2018. The
purpose of this report is to prepare an Engineering and Traffic Survey at these pre-determined
locations to establish updated speed limits that can be enforced using radar. Applicable sections
of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and Department of Tr ansportation California Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD), as read January 1, 201 4, with updates to the
CAMUTCD in March 2019 have been followed so that the posted speed limits can be upheld by
the courts and do not constitute a "Speed Trap" as defined by CVC Section 40802.
Below is a list of the 24 street segments that were surveyed as part of this Engineering and Traffic
Survey document.
STREET SEGMENT SUMMARY LIST
1. Arden Drive between Olive Street and La Rosa Drive
2. Arden Drive between La Rosa Drive and Lower Azusa Road
3. Baldwin Avenue between Longden Avenue and Live Oak Avenue
4. Baldwin Avenue between Live Oak Avenue and Lower Azusa Road
5. Broadway between Eaton Wash and Encinita Avenue
6. Broadway between Encinita Avenue and Baldwin Avenue
7. Camino Real Avenue between Oak Avenue and Temple City Boulevard DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 7 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
8. Daines Drive between Baldwin Avenue and El Monte Avenue
9. Encinita Avenue between Longden Avenue and Las Tun as Drive
10. Freer Street between El Monte Avenue and Santa Anita Avenue
11. Garibaldi Avenue between Rosemead Boulevard and East City Limit
12. Golden West Avenue between Lemon Avenue and Live Oak Avenue
13. Grand Avenue between El Monte Avenue and Santa Anita Avenue
14. Halifax Road between Live Oak Avenue and Lower Azusa Road
15. Las Tunas Drive between Muscatel Avenue and Rosemead Boulevard
16. Las Tunas Drive between Rosemead Boulevard and Rowland Avenue
17. Lemon Avenue between Oak Avenue and Golden West Avenue
18. Lower Azusa Road between Rio Hondo Avenue and Temple City Boulevard
19. Lower Azusa Road between Temple City Boulevard and Baldwin Avenue
20. Lower Azusa Road between Baldwin Avenue and Pal Mal Avenue
21. Santa Anita Avenue between Live Oak Avenue and Grand Avenue
22. Sereno Drive between Rosemead Boulevard and Encinita Avenue
23. Temple City Boulevard between Camino Real Avenue and Las Tunas Drive
24. Temple City Boulevard between Las Tunas Drive and Southern Pacific Railroad
Each of these segments are classified and defined with roadway classifications as listed in the
California Road Systems (CRS) Maps that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration
and maintained by the Department of Transportation (CVC 40802). Functional classifications are
used in determining which type of roads are eligible for Federal Funding to maintain the roads.
Usually Principal, Minor and Collector roads are eligible.
Functional classification is the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes,
or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide. Basic to this
process is the recognition that individual roads and streets do not serve travel independently in
any major way. Rather, most travel involves movement through a network of roads. Functional
classification defines how a particular road or street plays in serving the flow of tri ps through a
highway network. The four functional systems for urbanized areas are urban principal arterials,
minor arterials, collector streets, and local roads.
Principal Arterials: Principal Arterials carry most of the trips entering and leaving the City as well
as serves the major centers of activity of a City, carries the highest traffic volume along its
corridors while carrying the major portion of trips entering and leaving the urban area .
Minor Arterials: The minor arterial street system includes all arterials not classified as principal
and contains facilities that place more emphasis on land access than the higher system, and offer s
a lower level of traffic mobility. Such facilities may carry local bus routes and provide intra -
community continuity, but ideally should not penetrate identifiable neighborhoods. This system DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 8 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
should include urban connections to rural collector roads where such connections have not been
classified as urban principal arterials.
Collector Streets: The collector street system provides both land access service and traffic
circulation within residential neighborhoods, commercial and industrial areas. It differs from the
arterial system in that facilities on the collector system may penetrate residential neighborhoods,
distributing trips from the arterials through the area to the ultimate destination. Conversely,
collector streets also collect traffic from local streets in residential neighborhoods and channels
it into the arterial system.
Local Roads: These roadways provide direct access to individual residential properties, schools,
and churches typically with a posted speed of 25 MPH. Through traffic on local streets are usually
discouraged. Local roads within residential and business district zones are not subject to Speed
Trap provisions and are posted at the Prima Facie speed limit. Service to through traffic
movement is usually deliberately discouraged.
The following studied segments have been categorized and classified as follows for the City of
Temple City.
Principal Arterials:
• Las Tunas Drive: Muscatel Avenue to Rowland Avenue
• Santa Anita Avenue: Live Oak Avenue to Grand Avenue
Minor Arterials:
• Baldwin Avenue: Longden Avenue to Lower Azusa Road
• Lower Azusa Road: Rio Hondo Avenue to Pal Mal Avenue
• Temple City Boulevard: Camino Real avenue to Southern Pacific Railroad
Collector Streets:
• Arden Drive: Olive Street to Lower Azusa Road
• Broadway: Live Oak Avenue to Lower Azusa Road
• Camino Real avenue: Oak Avenue to Temple City Boulevard
• Encinita Avenue: Longden Avenue to Las Tunas Avenue
• Freer Street: El Monte Avenue to Santa Anita Avenue
• Garibaldi Avenue: Rosemead Boulevard to East City Limit
• Golden West Avenue: Lemon Avenue to Live Oak Avenue
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 9 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
Local Roads:
• Daines Drive: Baldwin Avenue to El Monte Avenue
• Grand Avenue: El Monte Avenue to Santa Anita Avenue
• Halifax Road: Live Oak Avenue to Lower Azusa Road
• Lemon Avenue: Oak Avenue to Golden West Avenue
• Sereno Drive: Rosemead Boulevard to Encinita Avenue
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 10 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
SECTION 2: OVERVIEW
California Vehicle Code:
Speed limits in California are governed by the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Sections 22348
through 22413. The statutes establish or provide means of establishing speed limits by:
1. Basic speed limit law.
Section 22350 of the CVC provides that no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a
speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, traffic
and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the
safety of persons or property. This is the basic speed limit law.
2. Prima facie speed limits are specified by statute or established by the State or local
authorities within their respective jurisdictions on the basis of an engineering and traffic
survey. Prima facie speed limits are specific limits stated in the CVC or specific limits
established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey authorized by the CVC. Prima
facie speed limits are preempted by the basic speed limit law when the conditions in CVC
Section 22350 are met.
Section 22352 of the CVC establishes prima facie speed limits as follows and shall be
applicable unless changed as authorized in the CVC and if so changed, only when signs have
been erected giving notice of the change:
a. Fifteen miles per hour.
• At a railroad grade crossing with an obstructed view.
• At an uncontrolled highway intersection with an obstructed view.
• In an alley.
b. Twenty-five miles per hour.
• On any highway other than a State highway, in any business or residence district, CVC
Sections 235 and 515 define a "business district” and a “residence district”
respectively. Section 240 of CVC prescribes a method for determining whether a
highway is within a business or residence district.
• Unless a different limit is established by procedures described elsewhere in the code.
• In a school zone, posted with SCHOOL warning signs. DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 11 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
• When passing a facility primarily used by senior citizens and contiguous to a street
other than a State highway and posted with a SENIOR warning sign.
Increase of local speed limits to 65 miles per hour
Section 22357.
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey
that a speed greater than 25 mph would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular
traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway
otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 mph, local authorities may by ordinance
determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 or 60 mph or a
maximum speed of 65mph, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly
movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The speed limit shall become effective
when signs are installed on the street and not revised unless justified on the basis of an
engineering and traffic survey.
Local Authority to Establish Prima Facie Speed Limits:
Sections 22357 and 22358 of CVC authorize local authorities to establish prima facie speed limits
on streets and roads under their jurisdiction on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey.
The declared prima Facie limits shall become effective when appropriate signs giving notice are
erected upon the street.
Speed Trap:
Section 40802 2B(i) of the CVC provides that prima facie speed limits established under Sections
22352, 22354, 22357, 22358 and 22358.3 may not be enforced by radar unless t he speed limit
has been justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following
time periods; five years to the date of the violation, within the last 7 years or if an engineering
and traffic survey was conducted more than 7 years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and
a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant
changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in
adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, the survey applies for 10 years.
This section does not apply to local streets, roads or school zones which have been set at the
Prima Facie speed limit. Local streets are defined to have the following characteristics:
• Width not more than 40 feet
• Not more than .5 miles of uninterrupted length
• 1 lane in each direction DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 12 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
Engineering and Traffic Survey:
Section 627 of CVC defines the term engineering and traffic survey and lists its requirements.
Section 627 states: "An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements
deemed necessary by the Department of Transportation, consideration of all of the following:
prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; accident records; highway
traffic and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver."
The Engineering and Traffic Survey should contain sufficient information to document that the
conditions of CVC Section 627 have been complied with and that other cond itions not readily
apparent to motorists are properly identified.
In determining the speed limit, which most appropriately facilitates the orderly movement of
traffic and is reasonable and prudent, important factors such as prevailing speeds, unexpected
conditions, and collision records are examined.
Determination of posted speed limits follow the latest CAMUTCD Policy dated January 1, 2014
with updates in 2019 by the State of California Department of Transportation. Speed limits shall
be rounded to the nearest (5 MPH) increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.
However, in cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per
hour increment of the 85th percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local
authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour
increment, but then the Department of Transportation or a local authority shall not reduce the
speed limit any further for any reason CVC 21400(4)(b).
An example of the application of this speed limit criteria is as follows:
• If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey is (37 MPH) then the speed limit would be
posted at 35 MPH or optionally reduced to 30 MPH. However,
• If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey is (38 MPH) then the speed limit would be
posted at 40 MPH or optionally reduced to 35 MPH.
The 85th percentile speed is often referred to as the cr itical speed. Pace speed is defined as the
10-mile increment of speed containing the largest number of vehicles. Speed limits established
on the basis of the 85th percentile conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to
what speed is reasonable and prudent, and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few
individuals.
Basic speed law states that no person shall drive at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent. DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 13 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
The majority of drivers comply with this law. Speed limits set at the 85 th percentile speed provide
law enforcement officers with a means of controlling drivers who will not conform to what the
majority considers reasonable and prudent.
When roadside development results in traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not
readily apparent to drivers, speed limits somewhat below the 85th percentile may be justified.
California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices:
Section 2B.13 CAMUTCD: Reduction of 85th Percentile Speed by Justification of an Engineering
and Traffic Study and Approved by Civil or Traffic Engineer.
Standard:
12a: When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 MPH increment
of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except as shown in the Option below.
Option:
The posted speed may be reduced by 5 MPH from the nearest 5 MPH increment of the 85th-
percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. See Standard below for
documentation requirements.
Standard:
12b: If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 MPH reduction applied, then an E&TS shall
document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved
by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in
compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358 -22358.5.
Support:
12c: The following example is provided to explain the application of this speed limit criteria:
A. If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 MPH, then the speed limit
would be established at 35 MPH since it is the closest 5 MPH increment to the 37 MPH speed. As
indicated by the option, this 35 MPH established speed limit could be reduced by 5 MPH to 30
MPH if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the
E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 14 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
The fundamentals used to establish speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in
a safe and reasonable manner, but need to be advised of conditions which may not be readily
apparent. For this reason, collision history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics , and land
use must be analyzed along with speed measurements to determine sp eed limits. Speed limit
changes are usually coordinated with visible changes in roadway conditions or roadside
developments.
In general, speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a
majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the
normal flow of traffic is considered a violator for enforcement purposes.
Data Collection:
Data was obtained regarding the prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic collisions, visibility
restrictions, roadway conditions, pedestrian activities, on-street parking and land use adjacent
to the roadways. Radar speed measurements were conducted during the months of January and
February 2020.
Highway, traffic and roadside land uses were analyzed for conditions not readily apparent to
motorists. The criteria and procedures described below were applied when using the electronic
radar to measure vehicle speeds on selected streets within the City of Temple City. Traffic volume
and speed in both directions were recorded.
The hours of radar operation were restricted to off -peak period for heavily traveled streets, and
to non-congested peak periods on lightly traveled streets on a weekday. All surveys were
conducted in clear weather. The radar measurements were taken from an unmarked vehicle so
as not to alter or impede the free flow of traffic.
A total of 100 samples were obtained in each direction for each street segment surveyed, where
possible. In no case were sample sizes less than 50 vehicles for each direction. For lower volume
streets, samples of free-flowing speeds were taken over several periods/days in order to gather
the required survey samples.
Accident data was obtained from the computerized accident records system maintained by the
State of California Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS). For purposes of this
study, information available for the most recent 3-year period was used to develop the accident
statistics as a part of the Engineering and Traffic Surveys. Accident data was obtained for the
years of 2017, 2018, and 2019. DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 15 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) data was obtained from counts taken by a private traffic counting
firm, in February of 2020. These counts were taken while school was in session. Any unusual
counts were checked and redone in order to verify the amount of traffic each segment carries.
The ADT counts were taken by NDS Services.
National Data & Surveying Services
8370 Wilshire Blvd. Ste, 205
Beverly Hills, CA 90211
Tel (323) 782-0090
Fax (323) 375-1666
www.ndsdata.com
Procedures:
The radar equipment used to collect speed measurements was a Model Phantom Traffic Radar,
operating frequency K, 1682 serial number, manufactured by Astro Products and a SCOUT-MPH
Traffic Radar, SHD-04287 serial number, manufactured by Decatur. The units were calibrated
before each series of measurements were taken. Tests of the unit were conducted in accordance
with the manufacturer’s specifications. Each of the radar guns were certified prior to beginning
of the field sampling. A copy of the current “Certificate of Calibration” of the radar guns used for
this study is attached.
The results of the radar speed measurements were computed, analyzed and summarized on
standard Traffic Survey Forms. Significant values obtained from computations are as follows:
• The Critical Speed or 85th percentile speed, is that speed at which 85 percent of the traffic
is moving. The Critical Speed is the primary guide in determining what the majority of
drivers believe is safe and reasonable. Speed limits set higher than the Critical Speed are
not considered reasonable and safe. The accepted practice is to set the speed limit at the
nearest 5 MPH increment to the Critical Speed or 85th percentile speed, unless other
factors require a lower limit.
• The 5 or 10 MPH pace is a measure of the dispersion of speeds within the survey sample
and is that 5 or 10 MPH increment containing the highest percentage of speeds in the
total sample. The accepted practice is to keep the speed limit within the 10 MPH pace
after considering the Critical Speed and any factors requiring a speed lower than the
Critical Speed. DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 16 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
The accident data for each street segment was compared to accident rates that can be reasonably
expected to occur on streets and highways of the same characteristics. These anticipated
accident rates have been developed by Caltrans and are applicable for use in the City of Temple
City. The accident rates used for this study are as follows:
Current accident rates are shown in terms of “accidents per 1,000,000 vehicle miles of travel” for
each segment. The rate was calculated for each segment using the following formula:
The Crossroads Software Accident Program calculated the accident rate for each segment.
As previously indicated, speed limits are usually set at or near the Critical Speed unless there are
other factors not readily apparent to a reasonable motorist which may justify a lower limit. The
field review of the selected street segments in the City of Temple City considered the following
factors:
1. Street width and alignment.
2. Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics.
3. Number of lanes, and other channelization and striping patterns.
4. Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on-street parking.
5. Location of stop signs, traffic signals, and other regulatory traffic control devices.
Accident Rate = (N x 5,280 x 1,000,000)/(ADT x L x Y x 365)
N: number of accidents within the study segment
ADT: average daily traffic volume
L: length of segment in feet
Y: number of years of accident history
CALIFORNIA STATE HIGHWAYS
STATEWIDE TRAVEL AND ACCIDENT RATES*
URBAN (Inside City)
2 and 3 lanes
4 or more undivided
4 or more divided
EXPECTED ACCIDENT RATES
1.84
1.24
1.44
*Source: Accident data on California state highways published by State of California,
Business, Transportation and Housing Agency, Department of Transportation,
Division of Traffic Operations DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 17 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
6. Visibility obstructions.
7. Land use and the proximity of schools.
8. Uniformity with existing speed zones in adjacent jurisdictions.
9. Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver.
10. Location of any uncontrolled Crosswalks.
11. Bike lanes, bike routes.
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 18 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
SECTION 3: SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
The Engineering and Traffic Survey summaries presented in this report illustrate the results of a
thorough evaluation of the data collected and provides a recommended speed limit for each
street segment surveyed. In each case, the recommended speed limit is consistent with the
prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements.
The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the California Vehicle Code, has made it clear that
it is their intent that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions,
or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not
require special downward speed zoning. The basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation
as to such conditions.
The recommendations contained in this report were intended to establish prima facie speed
limits. Prima Facie limits advise the motorist and enforcement agencies of the reasonable speed
for a section of highway for prevailing conditions. They are not intended to be absolute. All
violations of these speed limits are violations of the basic speed law (Section 22350 of California
Vehicle Code). This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than
is safe having regard for traffic, roadway and weather conditions. A prima facie limit merely
suggests a safe speed under normal conditions.
Out of the surveyed 24 segments and based on the Traffic and Engineering Survey results, it was
determined that the speed limits on the following 5 street segments are proposed to be changed.
Table 1
Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes
Street From To Classification
Existing
Posted
Limit
New
Posted
Limit
Change
in Speed
Daines
Drive
Baldwin
Avenue
El Monte
Avenue Local 30 25 YES
Freer
Street
El Monte
Avenue
Santa Anita
Avenue Collector 30 25 YES DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 19 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
Table 1
Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes
Street From To Classification
Existing
Posted
Limit
New
Posted
Limit
Change
in Speed
Grand
Avenue
El Monte
Avenue
Santa Anita
Avenue Local 30 25 YES
Halifax
Road
Live Oak
Avenue
Lower
Azusa Road Local 30 25 YES
Lemon
Avenue Oak Avenue
Golden
West
Avenue
Local 30 25 YES
Per Section 2B.13 CAMUTCD: Reduction of 85th Percentile Speed by Justification of an
Engineering and Traffic Study and Approved by Civil or Traffic Engineer as follows:
Option 1: For cases in which the nearest 5 MPH increment of the 85th percentile speed would
require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 MPH increment
below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. CVC Section 21400(b).
Option 2: The posted speed may be reduced by 5 MPH from the nearest 5 MPH increment of the
85th-percentile speed, due to road conditions and land use in compliance with CVC Sections 627
and 22358.5.
Option 3: The posted speed may be reduced by 5 MPH from the nearest 5 MPH increment of the
85th-percentile speed, due to higher than expected collision rates, road conditions and land use
in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5.
Segments With Conditions Recommending A Reduction In The Posted Speed Limit :
Segment #8. Daines Drive: Baldwin Avenue at El Monte Avenue. This roadway is considered
a local roadway with 1 lane in each direction, a posted speed of 30 mph with a street width of 34
to 36 feet. Land use is predominately single family resident ial with a public park on the north
side of the street. There is also a convalescent hospital at Gracewood Avenue. There is an
uncontrolled crosswalk by Nadine Street which leads to the park. Roadway conditions and land
use justify a reduction in the posted speed limit by 5 mph to 25 mph. This roadway meets
guidelines as listed in the CVC Section 627 for being classified as a residential district which if
classified would have a prima facie speed of 25 mph and not subject to future Engineering and
Traffic Surveys. DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 20 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
Segment #10. Freer Street: El Monte Avenue to Santa Anita Avenue. This roadway is considered
a Collector street with 1 lane in each direction with an existing posted speed of 30 mph. land use
is predominately single family residential. This segment has intermittent sidewalks on both sides
of the street. Roadway conditions and land use justify a reduction in the posted speed limit to 25
mph.
Segment #13. Grand Avenue: El Monte Avenue to Santa Anita Avenue. This roadway is
considered a local roadway with 1 lane in each direction, with an existing posted speed of 30 mph
with a street width of 33 to 34 feet. Land use is predominately single family residential with some
manufacturing and multi family dwelling units. This segment has intermittent sidewalks on both
sides of the street. Roadway conditions, collision rate and land use justify a reduction in the
posted speed limit by 5 mph to 25 mph.
Segment #14. Halifax Road: Live Oak Avenue to Lower Azusa Road. This roadway is considered
a local roadway with 1 lane in each direction, an existing posted speed of 30 mph with a street
width of 36-38’ feet wide. Primary land use is single family residential. Roadway conditions,
collision rate and land use justify a reduction in the posted speed limit by 5 mph to 25 mph. This
roadway meets guidelines as listed in the CVC Section 627 for being classified as a residential
district which if classified would have a prima facie speed of 25 mph and not subject to future
Engineering and Traffic Surveys.
Segment #17. Lemon Avenue: Oak Avenue to Golden West Avenue. This roadway is considered
a local roadway with 1 lane in each direction, an existing posted speed of 30 mph with a street
width of 41’ wide. Land use in predominately single family residential with a high school on the
north side of the road. Roadway conditions, collision rate and land use justify a reduction in the
posted speed limit by 5 mph to 25 mph.
Table 2 on the following pages in Section 3 provides a summary of each of the 24 segments
included in the 2020 Engineering and Traffic Survey. The table includes existing posted speed
limit, Average Daily Traffic, number of collisions, collision rates, 85th% percentile speeds, any
changes in posted limits and proposed 2020 speed limit.
Figure 1 in the Section 4 provides a map of the proposed 2020 speed limits on the studied
roadway segments. DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 21 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
Table 2
City of Temple City Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
(A): Street Classifications taken from the California Road Systems Map – FHWA and Caltrans
Reason for Reducing Speed from 85th% (Shown in Recommendations):
1 CVC 21400 (b) allows a 5 MPH Reduction in 85th% speed by 5 MPH for Rounding Down to Nearest Posted Limit.
2 CVC 627, 22358.5 and CAMUTCD 2B.13 allows the posted speed to be reduced by 5 MPH due to road conditions, land use.
3 CVC 627, 22358.5 posted speed may be set 5 MPH lower than 85th% based on a higher than expected collision rate, land use and roadway conditions.
ID Primary
Location
Limits
Street
Class. (A)
Posted
Speed
2020
ADT
No.
of
Acc.
in
3/yr
per.
Collision
Rate
Expected
Collision
Rate
85%
Speed
10
MPH
Pace
Limit
Per
85%
Change
in
Limit?
Yes/No
Rec.
2020
Posted
Limit
Beginning Ending
1 Arden Drive Olive Street La Rosa
Drive Collector 30 3,486 1 0.915 1.84 32.7 25-
34 35 No 301
2 Arden Drive La Rosa
Drive
Lower
Azusa Road Collector 30 3,608 2 1.771 1.84 33.4 26-
35 35 No 301
3 Baldwin
Avenue
Longden
Avenue
Live Oak
Avenue
Minor
Arterial 40 29,323 8 0.335 1.44 42.6 35-
44 45 No 401
4 Baldwin
Avenue
Live Oak
Avenue
Lower
Azusa Road
Minor
Arterial 40 27,318 42 1.492 1.44 42.3 35-
44 40 No 40
5 Broadway Eaton Wash Encinita
Avenue Collector 35 10280 7 1.405 1.24 36.7 29-
38 35 No 35
6 Broadway Encinita
Avenue
Baldwin
Avenue Collector 30 4847 6 1.153 1.84 33.7 26-
35 35 No 301 DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 22 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
Table 2
City of Temple City Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
(A): Street Classifications taken from the California Road Systems Map – FHWA and Caltrans
Reason for Reducing Speed from 85th% (Shown in Recommendations):
1 CVC 21400 (b) allows a 5 MPH Reduction in 85th% speed by 5 MPH for Rounding Down to Nearest Posted Limit.
2 CVC 627, 22358.5 and CAMUTCD 2B.13 allows the posted speed to be reduced by 5 MPH due to road conditions, land use.
3 CVC 627, 22358.5 posted speed may be set 5 MPH lower than 85th% based on a higher than expected collision rate, land use and roadway conditions.
ID Primary
Location
Limits
Street
Class. (A)
Posted
Speed
2020
ADT
No.
of
Acc.
in
3/yr
per.
Collision
Rate
Expected
Collision
Rate
85%
Speed
10
MPH
Pace
Limit
Per
85%
Change
in
Limit?
Yes/No
Rec.
2020
Posted
Limit
Beginning Ending
7 Camino Real
Avenue Oak Avenue
Temple
City
Boulevard
Collector 30 1847 0 0 1.84 31.3 23-
32 30 No 30
8 Daines Drive Baldwin
Avenue
El Monte
Avenue Local 30 1649 3 2.16 1.84 32.3 25-
34 30 Yes 253
9 Encinita
Avenue
Longden
Avenue
Las Tunas
Drive Collector 30 2207 4 3.185 1.84 32.9 25-
34 35 No 303
10 Freer Street El Monte
Avenue
Santa
Anita
Avenue
Collector 30 2796 2 1.513 1.84 29.8 22-
31 30 Yes 251
11 Garibaldi
Avenue
Rosemead
Boulevard
East City
Limit Collector 30 3241 12 2.968 1.84 33.2 25-
34 35 No 303
12 Golden West
Avenue
Lemon
Avenue
Live Oak
Avenue Collector 30 2774 11 3.634 1.84 32.9 25-
34 35 No 303 DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 23 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
Table 2
City of Temple City Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
(A): Street Classifications taken from the California Road Systems Map – FHWA and Caltrans
Reason for Reducing Speed from 85th% (Shown in Recommendations):
1 CVC 21400 (b) allows a 5 MPH Reduction in 85th% speed by 5 MPH for Rounding Down to Nearest Posted Limit.
2 CVC 627, 22358.5 and CAMUTCD 2B.13 allows the posted speed to be reduced by 5 MPH due to road conditions, land use.
3 CVC 627, 22358.5 posted speed may be set 5 MPH lower than 85th% based on a higher than expected collision rate, land use and roadway conditions.
ID Primary
Location
Limits
Street
Class. (A)
Posted
Speed
2020
ADT
No.
of
Acc.
in
3/yr
per.
Collision
Rate
Expected
Collision
Rate
85%
Speed
10
MPH
Pace
Limit
Per
85%
Change
in
Limit?
Yes/No
Rec.
2020
Posted
Limit
Beginning Ending
13 Grand
Avenue
El Monte
Avenue
Santa
Anita
Avenue
Local 30 1715 2 2.444 1.84 32.2 24-
33 30 Yes 253
14 Halifax Road Live Oak
Avenue
Lower
Azusa
Road
Local 30 1199 6 4.855 1.84 32.0 24-
33 30 Yes 253
15 Las Tunas
Drive
Muscatel
Avenue
Rosemead
Boulevard Principal 30 28099 17 2.669 1.44 33.1 25-
34 35 No 301
16 Las Tunas
Drive
Rosemead
Boulevard
Rowland
Avenue Principal 30 24,860 101 3.151 1.24 32.9 26-
35 35 No 303
17 Lemon
Avenue Oak Avenue
Golden
West
Avenue
Local 30 2414 5 3.757 1.84 31.9 24-
33 30 Yes 253
18 Lower Azusa
Road
Rio Hondo
Avenue
Temple
City
Boulevard
Minor
Arterial 40 16950 11 1.469 1.24 42.3 35-
44 40 No 40 DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 24 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
Table 2
City of Temple City Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
(A): Street Classifications taken from the California Road Systems Map – FHWA and Caltrans
Reason for Reducing Speed from 85th% (Shown in Recommendations):
1 CVC 21400 (b) allows a 5 MPH Reduction in 85th% speed by 5 MPH for Rounding Down to Nearest Posted Limit.
2 CVC 627, 22358.5 and CAMUTCD 2B.13 allows the posted speed to be reduced by 5 MPH due to road conditions, land use.
3 CVC 627, 22358.5 posted speed may be set 5 MPH lower than 85th% based on a higher than expected collision rate, land use and roadway conditions.
ID Primary
Location
Limits
Street
Class. (A)
Posted
Speed
2020
ADT
No.
of
Acc.
in
3/yr
per.
Collision
Rate
Expected
Collision
Rate
85%
Speed
10
MPH
Pace
Limit
Per
85%
Change
in
Limit?
Yes/No
Rec.
2020
Posted
Limit
Beginning Ending
19 Lower Azusa
Road
Temple City
Boulevard
Baldwin
Avenue
Minor
Arterial 40 23521 26 2.074 1.44 42.5 35-
44 40 No 40
20 Lower Azusa
Road
Baldwin
Avenue
Pal Mal
Avenue
Minor
Arterial 40 26265 25 1.265 1.24 42.6 35-
44 45 No 401
21 Santa Anita
Avenue
Live Oak
Avenue
Grand
Avenue Principal 40 20981 7 0.429 1.44 42.2 35-
44 40 No 40
22 Sereno Drive Rosemead
Boulevard
Encinita
Avenue Local 30 1000 1 1.545 1.84 32.2 25-
34 30 No 30
23 Temple City
Boulevard
Camino Real
Avenue
Las Tunas
Drive
Minor
Arterial 35 23189 53 2.117 1.44 37.1 30-
39 35 No 35
24 Temple City
Boulevard
Las Tunas
Drive
Southern
Pacific
Railroad
Minor
Arterial 35 22879 85 3.819 1.44 37.4 30-
39 35 No 35
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 25 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
SECTION 4: CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 CITYWIDE SPEED LIMIT MAP
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 26 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
SECTION 5: ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY SUMMARY
FORMS
The following pages consist of the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Forms for each
segment. DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 27 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 28 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 29 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 30 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 31 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 32 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 33 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 34 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 35 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 36 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 37 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 38 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 39 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 40 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 41 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 42 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 43 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 44 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 45 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 46 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 47 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 48 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 49 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 50 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 51 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 52 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 53 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 54 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 55 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 56 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 57 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 58 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 59 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 60 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 61 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 62 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 63 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 64 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 65 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 66 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 67 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 68 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 69 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 70 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 71 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 72 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 73 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 74 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 75 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
SECTION 6: AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) COUNTS
The following pages consist of the ADT count sheets for all segments.
The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) data was obtained from counts taken by a private traffic counting
firm, in late February 2020. These counts were taken while school was in session. Any unusual
counts were checked and redone in order to verify the amount of traffic each segment carries.
ADT counts were taken by NDS Services.
National Data & Surveying Services
8370 Wilshire Blvd. Ste, 205
Beverly Hills, CA 90211
Tel (323) 782-0090
Fax (323)375-1666
www.ndsdata.com
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 76 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 77 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 78 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 79 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 80 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 81 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 82 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 83 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 84 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 85 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 86 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 87 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 88 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 89 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 90 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 91 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 92 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 93 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 94 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 95 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 96 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 97 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 98 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 99 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 100 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
SECTION 6: RADAR CALIBRATION
The following pages consists of the Traffic Radar Certifications for the Speed Measuring Devices
used for the City of Temple City 2020 Engineering and Traffic Survey.
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 101 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY 2020 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Adopted by Temple City, City Council Resolution No. X on X
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
Prepared By: Transtech Engineers, Inc. | Page 102 of 102
D R A F T C O P Y
SUBMITTED TO CITY ON 04-17-20
DRAFT