HomeMy Public PortalAboutA1993-02-09 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ^ � ��yc�.c..�..
, AGENDA
�
�
� LYNWOOD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING - 7:30 p.m.
City Hall Council Chambers
" 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, CA �,�2�� ��
F2E EI i
February 9, 1993 CiTYOFLYNW00U
CITY CLERKS OF�ICE
FEB 41ag3
AI�
Elizabeth Dixon 7i8�9i10i11i12i1i2�3�4
Chairperson )
�%� �e
Donald Dove ,/ Carlton Mc i ler,�
Vice Chairman \/ � Commissioner
John Haynes �b Roy Pryor ��
Commissioner Commissioner
Jamal Muhsin � Errick Lee �
Commissioner Commissioner
C O M M I S S I O N C O U N S E L:
Henry S. Barbosa Kenneth Fong
�- City Attorney Deputy City Attorney
�-
STAFF:
Sol Blumenfeld, Director Louis Omoruyi
Community Development Department Planning Associate
Art Barfield John Oskoui
Planning Associate Assistant Director
Public Works
Louis Morales
Planning Associate
,� �
. February 9, 1993
OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Call meeting to order.
B. Flag salute.
C. Roll call of Co'mmissioners.
D. Certification of Agenda Posting.
E. Approval of minutes for the January 12, 1993 Planning
Commission Meeting.
CONTINQED PQSLIC HEA]tING:
1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 121
Applicant: Venancio Nacias
COMMENTS•
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit in order
to develop a two (2) unit residential development at 11304
Louise Avenue in the R-3 (Multi-Family) zone. This case was
continued fram the November 10, 1992 Planning
Commission Meetiz�g.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2452.
A. Certifying that project is categorically exempt from the
provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by
Section 15061b(3).
B. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 121, subject to the
stated condi�tions and requirements.
2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 124
Applicant: A1 S&�ook
COMMENTS•
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to incorporate a three (3) bay express lube and oil
change operation into an existing automotive repair at 3861
E. Imperial Highway in the C-2 (Light Commercial) zone. The
applicant is rec�uesting to continue this case until the March
9, 1993 Planning Commission meeting.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the
Planning Commission continue the case pursuant to applicant
request.
3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 125
Applicant: Rick Kessler
COMMENTS:
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to develop a sixteen (16) unit townhouse development
at 4291 Carlin Avenue in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential)
zone.
f:\agenda\feb93
2
, __
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff attempted to work with the applicant to redesign the
project pursuant to Planning Commission direction to redesign
the site relative to building massing, articulation, open
space and visi�tor parking. However, the applicant is
unwilling to pre�pare a revised design. Staff respectfully
requests that ai:ter consideration, the Planning Commission
disapprove the project based upon the applicant's lack of
response to the Planning Commission's recommendation to
revise the project design.
4. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT CASE NO. 28
Applicant: City of Lynwood
COMMENTS•
Staff is proposing to amend Chapter 25, the Official Zoning
Ordinance by adding to Section 25-4-5b, a list of "Approved"
roofing materials as part of City's Building Standards.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
- Staff respectfully request that after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2457.
A. Finding that the Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case No. ZOA
28 will not have a s�'gnificant effect on the environment
and certifying the negative declaration as adequat�
B. Approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case No. ZOA 28,
subject to the stated conditions and requirements on list
of approved roofing materials for inclusion in the
development standard.
NEW PDBLIC HEARING:
5. TENTATIVE PARCEI, MAP NO. 23661 - CASE NO. TPM 27
Applicant: Jorc�e Quirate
COMMENTS•
The applicant i:: requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map
No. 23661 for the purpose of combining portions of lots 61
and 62, of Tract 10634 into one (1) parcel at 11271 Wright
Road in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
' Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2462.
A. Certifying �that the project is categorically exempt from
the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by
Section 15061 b(3).
B. Approving 7Centative Parcel Map No. 27, subject to the
stated conditions and requirements.
f:\agerde\feb93
3
' ,�, �',
� LYNW'OOD CITY PLANNINti COMMISSION
' REGULAR MEETING, JANUARY 12,1993
The Lynwood City Planning Commission met in a Regular Session in
' the Council Chamber of Lynwood City Hall, 11330 Bullis Rd. on the
above date.
Chairperson Dixon presided at the meeting.
The flag salute was led by Commissioner Lee.
Chairperson Dixon asked for Roll Call of Commissioners.
Commissioner Muhsin and Commissioner McMiller was absent.
Mr. Blumenfeld stated the agenda was duly posted in acc�rdance
, with the Brown Act.
It was asked by Sol Blumenfeld that the minutes for November 10,
and the minutes of December 8, be approved.
It was moved by Commissioner Lee seconded by Commissioner Haynes
to approve the minutes of the previous meetings.
ROLL CALL
AYSB: DOVE� HAYNEB� PRYOR� LEE AND DZBON
NOEB; NONfi
ABSENT: MCMILLER� MIIHSIN
Chairperson Dixon then turned the meeting over to the Director of
Community Development Sol Blumenfeld.
Mr. Blumenfeld introduced the first item on the Agenda C.U.P.
114, applicant, Mr. Louis Ross. He requested that Commission
withdraw the application as it was incomplete and because all
extensions relative to completing the project application had
been exhausted.
Commissioner Haynes recognized the arrival of Commissioner Muhsin
to the meeting.
The applicant requested to be heard on the matter.
Commissioner Haynes inquired if the matter was open for Public
hearing.
Attorney Kenneth Fong recommended that the Commission not hear
from the applicant as the item was not being heard as a
Conditional Use Permit public hearing.
Chairperson Dixon then asked if applicant wished to be heard.
Mr. Roy Abelson, attorney for the applicant, explained the
reasons for the delay in providing required information including
conducting a Phase One Soil Study. He stated that there was no
reason why the C.U.P. should be deemed incomplete. Mr. Ross's
Soil Study was then presented to the Commission.
Commission directed Staff to review the document.
City Attorney then explained to Mr. Abelson that ruling the
application incomplete didn't mean it could not be submitted at
later time when all required information could be made available.
Motion to approve Staff recommendation to withdraw the
application.
1
� �
City Attorney Kenneth Fong then stated to Commission that by
, rloing this it will deem it incomplete at this point and staff
could bring it back at an appropriate time when all necessary
information and conditions had been complied with.
Motion was made by Commissioner Haynes to then deem application
incomplete at this time, it was then seconded by Commissioner
Lee.
ROLL CALL
AYEBi DOVB� MOHS7:N� PRYOR� LEB DISON
, NOEB: NONE
ABBENT: MCMILLER
Mr. Blumenfeld then introduced Agenda item C.U.P. 121 Venencio
Macias, and requested a continuance of this item until the next
meeting on February 9, 1993.
It was moved by Commissioner Haynes seconded by Commissioner
Pryor to continue C.U.P. 121 until February 9, 1993.
ROLL CALL
, AYEBi DOVS� HAYNBB� MIIHSIIQ� PRYOR� LEE� DISON
NOEB: NONE
ABSENTS MCMILLER
Mr. Blumenfeld then introduced the next item on the Agenda.
C.U.P. 122 Pacific Medical Building. This is a continued item
from the December Sth meeting. He then introduced Louis Omoruyi
' to present a brief presentation.
Commissioner pove asked to be excused from the next item due the
a conflict of interest.
Planning Associate Louis Omoruyi then gave a brief presentation
regarding the proposed development. Mr. Omoruyi discussed a
parking survey that was conducted in regards to parking
facilities. Also stated that certain conditions on this C.U.P.
were modified pursuant to review by the City Manager.
Mr Blumenfeld reviewed the conditions which were proposed to be
omitted.
Chairperson Dixon then inquired about the conditions that were to
be modified.
Mr. Blumenfeld presented a list of these conditions. improvements
to Cesar Chavez Lane and Martin Luther King Blvd. were to be
primarily omitted. Conditions that were renegotiated were
Condition #45 dedication of a 5ft. wide strip on Birch and a 5ft
wall on Cesar Chavez Lane deleted, the 5ft wide sidewalk on
Beechwood lOft wide sidewalk was amended. #49 remove existing
5ft. sidewalk on Cesar Chavez, current gutter amended, to
construct PCC curb and gutter 2ft wide to match. #50 damaged
sidewalks amended. #51 reconstruct damaged curb and gutter
required pavement Imperial to Birch to M.L.K. Blvd. amended. #52
reconstruct damaged driveways on Birch-M.L.K. Blvd amended.#53
wheelchair ramps remained the same. #55 install 25, 24 in box
trees deleted. #56 regrade parkway and landscaping deleted. #57
provide 8 marble like street poles and underground services along
Cesar Chavez Lane .remained. #64 install beeping devises for
person remained. #49-57 were amended pertaining to construation
and repair of pavement, (curb and gutter) deleted along Cesar
Chavez.
Chairperson Dixon then asked if this C.U.P. had been approved,
and if there had already been ground breaking.
2
� � �
, Rick Kessler, 14543 Telegraph Rd., La Mirada, spoke on behalf of
'this project. Stated that there would be 16 Units built and that
approximate price ranged from $110,000 to $124,500. This will
make them affordable housing for low and moderate income
families. A density bonus was requested to build at increase
density.
Neft Corter 14543 Telegraph Rd. spoke on behalf of the project.
He was also in favor of this project.
Rev. Floyd 3696 Cedar Ave. spoke in opposition to this project.
He expressed concern relative to a proposed initiative that would
affect the potential acquisition and use of an adjacent property.
Commissioner Haynes indicated that there is no reason to build
anymore low income houses in the City of Lynwood which would
impact market value of surrounding houses. Commissioner Lee
indicated several concerns with the project design, open space
and parking.
Block watch Captain Henry Sims for this area was in opposition to
this project.
� After further discussion from staff;
It was moved by Commissioner Lee and seconded by Commissioner
Dove to continue C.U.P. #125 to permit the applicant an
opportunity to redesign the project to permit greater open space,
better layout and parking.
CALL
AYEB: DOVE� HAYNES� MIIHSIN� PRYOR� LEB
NOEB: NONE
ABSENT: MCMILLER
ABSTAIN: DIBON
At this time Commissioner Haynes asked to be excused do to the
fact that he had a flight to catch.
Mr. Blumenfeld then introduced the next item on the Agenda,
Zoning Case #29, to adopt the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance
as mandated by the State of California including provisions for
water conservation, relative to project landscaping.
It was moved by Commissioner Muhsin seconded by Commissioner Lee
that Case #Z9 be approved by the Planning Commission.
ROLL CALL
AYES: DOVE� MIIHSZN� PRYOR� DIBON
NOEB: NONE
ABSENT: HAYNEB� MCMILLER
STAFF COMMENTS
Mr. Blumenfeld then discussed fencing standards after surveying
other cities and recommended that Commission continue discussion
on the matter to the next Planning Meeting to permit additional
time to study the ordinances of other cities.
4
i
' � �
COMMI88ION ORALB
Commissioner Lee then asked that staff bring back C.U.P., Ali
Zakari for Commission reconsideration. Commissioner Lee also
wanted to know the status of the ordinance for parking relative
to the St. Frances Medical Center parking structure.
Mr. Blumenfeld then forwarded information on the parking
ordinance and when it had been revised. After further discussion
' Commission decided to adjourn meeting.
It was moved by Commissioner Muhsin to adjourn meeting at 11:15,
seconded by Commissioner Lee.
ELIZABETH DIXON,
CHAIRPERSON
APPROVED TO CONTENT:
SOL BLUMENFELD, DIRECTOR KENNETH FONG,
COMMUNITY DEVEIAPMENT DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY
5
,A, �`
Mr. Toothacre then stated to Commissioners that ground breaking
.had taken place.
Chairperson Dixon then opened this item for a public hearing.
Mark Toothacre, Pacific Medical Building spoke on behalf of
C.U.P. 122. He explained the certain conditions that were
renegotiated with staff were mainly on Cesar Chavez Lane and that
St. Francis Medical Center had (per an earlier City Resolution)
� up to 10 years to complete improvements on Cesar Chavez Lane. He
' explained the importance and need for the parking structure. Mr.
Toothacre then informed staff that while under construction there
would be sufficient parking at St. Francis for employees and
patients.
Joseph Kung, 3621 Martin Luther King Blvd., spoke on behalf of
himself and other adjacent owners. He and several adjacent owners
where in opposition to this project. He noted that the survey
' that was conducted was done on off-peak days and that another
survey should be conducted on peak parking demand days. He also
stated how he conducted his own survey and that it did not
coincide with the figures of Pacific Medical.
Rev. Charles Floyd 3696 Cedar Ave spoke in favor of the project.
Larry Greer 2323 W. Lincoln Ave., Anaheim, presented the parking .
survey he conducted for the project, and felt that while under
construction adequate parking will be available.
Commissioner Haynes then requested some clarity as to how many
' spaces would be left for parking while the trailers and
construction crew were on the premises.
Larry Greer stated that only two-thirds of the parking was going
to be occupied and adequate parking would be available.
After further discussion;
'Commissioner Lee recommended an additional condition that during
construction there be no vehicles, equipment, employees or crew
park on Cesar Chavez Lane, M.L.K., Birch or imperial Hwy.
ROLL CALL
� AYES: DOVB� HAYNEB� PRYOR, LES� DIBON
NOEB: MIIHSIN
ABSENT: MCMILLER
Mr. Blumenfeld then introduced the next item on the Agenda
C.U.P. 124, A1 Shook and indicated that the applicant is
requesting a continuance on this matter.
It was moved by Commissioner pove seconded by Commissioner Haynes
to continue C.U.P. 124 until the next planning meeting.
Mr. Blumenfeld then introduced the next item on the Agenda,
C.U.P. 125 Rick Kessler to develop a 16 unit townhouse
development at 4291 Carlin Ave.
Chairperson Dixon then asked to be excused from this item due to
the fact the project within 50 ft of her home.
Planning Associate Louis Morales then gave a brief presentation
on behalf of this pr.oject. Staff suggest this item be adopted by
the Planning Commission and adopt the attached Resolution.
Commissioner pove then opened this item for Public Hearing.
3
�
DATE: Februar�), 1993 ��ENDA�E� N0 �
�' � TO: PLANNING COMMISSION l�V � l � l
CAS�. NQ.
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director �
Community Development Depa ment
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 121
Applicant: Venancio Nacias
Pr000sal•
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit in order to
develop a two (2) unit apartment at 11304 Louise Avenue in the
R-3 (MUlti-Family Residential) zone.
Facts•
1. Source of Authoritv
Section 25-4.a. of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that
a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to construct
multiple dwelling units in the R-3 (Multi-family Residential)
zone. This case was continued from the January 12 1993
Planning Commission Meeting in order to allow the applicant
to redesign his proposed project. The applicant has since
decided to maintain his original proposal.
' 2. Property Location
The site is located on the east side of Louise Avenue between
Sanborn and Martin Luther King Blvd. (refer to the attached
location map).
3. Prooertv Size
The subject site consists of a lot with a substandard width
which is rectangularly shaped, and approximately 6,000
square feet in size (40' X 150').
4. ExistinQ Land Use
The property is currently vacant. The surrounding land uses
are as follows:
North - Multi-Family Residential
South - Multi-Family Residential
East - Multi-Family Residential
West - Two-Family Residential
5. Land Use Description
The General Plan Designation for the subject property is
Multi- Residential while the Zoning Classification is R-3.
The surrounding land use designations are as follows:
General Plan Zonina
North - Multi-Family Residential North - R-3
South - Multi-Family Residential South - R-3
East - Multi-Family Residential East - R-3
West - Town House & Cluster Housing West - R-2
f:\plaming\staffrpt\cup121pc
1
!
' � �
� 6. Proiect Characteristics:
The applicant proposes to develop approximately two (2), two
story, 4,061 dwelling units with two (2) car garages for
each unit. One unit will contain on its first floor the
aforementioned two (2) car garage, a kitchen and nook, a
dining area, bath, and small bedroom. The second floor will
consist of two (2) bedrooms, a bath, and family room with a
wet bar. The second dwelling will contain on its first floor
a two (2) car garage, kitchen, dining, and living area, and a
small bedroom and bath. The second floor of this unit will
� contain two (2) bedrooms, a family room, and bath. The
proposal call for a minimum of twenty five (25�) per cent of
the site area to be landscaped.
7. Site Plan Review
At a special meeting on October 29, 1992, the Site Plan
Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and
recommended approval to the Planning Commission subject to
the conditions and requirements stated in the attached
Resolution.
8. Zoninq Enforcement Historv
None of record at the time this report was completed.
9. Public Resoonse
None of record at the time this report was prepared by Staff.
However, it has been reported that the subject site must be
cleaned by the property owner.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION:
1. Consistencv with General Plan
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning
classification (R-3),and the General Plan designation Multi-
Family Residential. Therefore, granting Conditional Use
Permit No. 121 will not adversely affect the General Plan.
2. G�te Suitabilitv
The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
proposed development relative to structures, parking, walls,
fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features
, required by the Zoning Ordinance.
3. Compatibilitv
The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of
residential developments; therefore, the project will be
compatible with the surrounding land uses.
4. Compliance with Develooment Standards
The proposal meets the development standards required by the
Zoning Ordinance with respect to setbacks; lot coverage;
building height and density.
5. Conditions of Approval
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have
a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties
or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or
welfare.
f:\plaming\staffrpt\cup12
2
� �
6. Benefits to Communitv
The proposal will assist in upgrading the residential use of
the property and support the intent of the General Plan.
7. Environmental Assessment
The Community Development Department Staff has determined
that the project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section
15061 b(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality
Act of 1989 as amended.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2452.
1. Certifying that project is categorically exempt from the
provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by
Section 15061b(3).
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 121, subject to the
stated conditions.and requirements.
ATTACHMENTS•
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
3. Resolution No. 2452
f\ptaming\staffrpt\tup121pt
3
'ON �Sd�
� ;� ; ,., , . �, �,, ,:� ,
: �,. , . ,.,,�� : � ,,, �i
, � cs l _ ,:.., y �,
� ' I �ir ,�, T/ .
�.��\ fr cv. � �. - . .
-
� fIli: � I)/ -� q _.'_'_' -
io.. I .���1 1 �
8 fS �,..� ...�,i !/
., ��.� � �..o i M _.`__ _-
p'fft
�' [l f[I� -`;R .. ._. _ .. � p , ,._. �._`„osi_�_. � . .0 t/
� ;:
flst \ Q lec �i � � C .
/ S:K
S �.� o at - sr'rs_ _..' ,F �trc.' t�. y
� ` 4t t c.�.� �' r�, .:., ii j/
. A ..��., � , \
�• u «' n- - �jt - - nr�a ��- -�r- - - -
�
crr Z I ��", S. °„
�o R��tsiri � _r�s�in ..n .
�c� Y fs'c - � -
pP •u.. !N S i[IF/ � S L� \
�tv1 I ou� '.
i - "�r�� -..���- irru -- -e > k
'!lM ' „ �o �,�, S -� .. -- y/ -
ra 7 .� _ cf�sc__,,, -
� . < . . _ 6S_ _ _ _ c-. � ` o P/
n�u
+ � ro: ;
d � � � .•� oo�eso �,,,, o v.-, ° o f ,
.. , �ft'; os w -�-
y �ti � o ... d 9 09 y � 4 0 ��, :�Y , a.
4 �. ioc,v�
p I ..r�iii � � .
�.' �_ _ ..._ or�ss�_ ._ _ _. _� .
�
d� r__ t ^ _�- \ '
QC� � roco7 _ .... i. . � r. �I `` � �vii�
� i9 '- 70 r G,�. � G:I
l' ��� � rtroa �, ��� u.t ': ,
U L . — 1 - OSZ T� \ — ' � _� .ar_I_� _�a£...
o� Z9 .�
• 4 --- � � � ; �,�; �
�
� 11J ., r. eF e
_� ,�..
' '-' - .___ . -". _
�� - '_" �_�i�
_... ..... .
tri.yrWS ,^ 8 ^ O(�Ffl F9 _ I_ -__ ml'i � p. `.. . .
V SI
/ �_;_- --1 �ti.-oti ° ' „ I/
. '� k _ �-___ _-_
.. ��� �.:ii R -�-- uasz P9 �- os� . o a Pr
k ^ 8 --!—' - � � -- —. —
nsoov I . . .... . �. ..�
, ��� ___-.,_ iroo7 - � 1 -�.0 O/
�� � a=- - 99.- �• - \ , ,, 9
I�orz � tvr+n_ ° o �� �'� s/ y
�? o s��,o, o,, ,..
� �"` � l9bet ` amr � •. C/
. V ��Of/ 1 9S _9f/Sl 1 0
/ I � . o ,.. �
.. ' J. °�•`� s °.. � ni I rt aii,�. o U y
� . u �_,� �rro�o� s,o��� ..,,
. . _ ..... . ?i n.
,;
:_ _ �
-- � 4 K . ..,��
a i: � ,
�{ �t � .,�,n� -.
�� o
' t ' i
� �� J ^ ,���o � ,
N ' ryo
�J�
� f .,; � o S
, .n
i iri
� 7 0
- r rYJ . �
/LL - .
;: . II. ' � i�
�, i �oo � .��� ' 09,�
_""__ "-' T 1
"_'S -
��i' NJOONYJ' �
/O 7 a ,', �--jr �
� _ S � Y
..�` .. I�
f>� '` " w L.
�
� bi � L
� Ki n �
� �:i • a I
- u p �
. : � . �� o I
• I
� � ��� .�u o
�___ '
� � � q
a ; l �� o
� . P .n'I I
u ddU�9 NOIl`d�O�
�. �
.. �.T. �-.�
' ��RESOLUTION NO. 2452 �
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 121 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO
(2) TWO STO:RY DWELLING UNITS AT 11304 LOUISE
AVENUE IN T:HE R-3 (MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)
ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law,
conducted a public hcaaring on the subject application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent
testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined
that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines Section 1!5061 b(3), as amended; and
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for
development in the R•-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone.
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines as follow,s:
A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and
shape to <�ccommodate the structures, parking, walls,
landscapin.g, driveways and other development features
required b:y the Official Zoning Ordinance.
B. The struci:ures, as proposed, subject to conditions,
will not have a negative effect on the values of
surroundi�.g properties or interfere with or endanger
the public, health, safety, or welfare.
C. The site �will be developed pursuant to the current
zoning regulations and site plan submitted and approved
by the Site Plan Review Committee.
D. The grant:ing of the Conditional Use Permit will not
adversely affect the General Plan.
E. The proposed development will add favorably to the
housinq si�ock and will provide additional affordable
priced housing in concert with the policies of the
Housing Element of the General Plan.
F. The propos�ed development will esthetically upgrade the
area and will act as a catalyst in fostering other
quality developments.
Section 2. The� Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby
approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 121, provided the
following conditions are observed and complied with at all times.
f\plarming\resoWtion\f:reso2452
1
• ,� ,�
COMMCJNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable
regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform
Building Code and the Fire Code and be in substantial
compliance with plans on file with the Community Development
Department.
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or
structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community
Development Department, Planning Division, for review of
said Conditional Use Permit.
3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments.
4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a
Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read,
understands, ancl agrees to all conditions of this resolution
prior to issuanc:e of any building permits.
PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS
5. The applicant s�hall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood
main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving
the proposed de��elopment.
6. This Conditiona:L Use Permit shall lapse and become void one
hundred and twe�nty (120) days after the use permitted has
been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised.
7. Construction shall commence within (6) months from date
of issuance of building permits.
8. Landscaped area.s are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25�)
percent of the :lot area.
9. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance
with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the
Community Development Director prior to issuance of any
building permit;s.
The minimum p:lant material shall be trees and shrubs
combined with �3round cover as follows: One (1) five (5)
gallon shrub for each 100 square feet of landscaped area;
and two (2) fifteen gallon trees for each 500 square feet of
landscaped areas.
10. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped
and shall consi.st predominately of plant materials except
for necessary walks, drives and fences.
11. A minimum of two (2) car garages per unit.
12. A six (6') foot high block all shall be installed along the
perimeter of tlze property, except within the twenty (20')
foot front yard setback. In this frontage, if built, the
wall shall not exceed a height of four (4') feet measured
from top of curb.
13. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet.
14. Final buildi�ng elevations, including materials of
construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the
Building Official and the Planning Division prior to
issuance of any building permits.
f\pleming\resolution\f:reso2452
2
� �
� 15. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer
shall pay $1.65 per square foot for residential buildings to
the Lynwood Uni:Eied School District, pursuant to Government
Code Section 53080.
16. All driveway anci parking areas shall be paved.
17. Acoustical construction materials shall be used throughout
the units to m_�tigate freeway noise to the standards and
satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division.
18. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective material
including , conc:rete tile, clay tile.
19. Residential st:ructures shall have an exterior siding of
brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar
material other than the reflective glossy, polished and/or
rolled-formed t!�pe metal siding.
20. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the
street dedicati��ns.
21. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the
exterior elevat.ion of the building must be approved by the
Director of Com�aunity Development or his/her designee.
22. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in
a consistent manner, including the incorporation within the
side and rear building elevations of same or all of the
design elements used for the primary (front) facades.
23. That the applicant submit elevation drawings to the Planning
Division showin�g the exterior building design; including the
specification of colors, and materials.
24. All security fe�nces, grills, etc. shall be architecturally
compatible wit:h the design of the subject and adjacent
building. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc.
shall be installed without the prior written approval of the
, Director of Community Development.
25. Air conditione�rs, heating, cooling ventilation equipment,
swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical
devices shall be located within the rear yard or street.
Such equipment shall be screened from surrounding properties
and streets and so operated that they do not disturb the
peace, quiet �snd comfort of neighboring residents, in
accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance.
26. The vacant lot shall be cleaned and maintained in sanitary
condition pending construction and shall be maintained in a
neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure to comply may
result in revocation of the Conditional Use Permit.
27. A cover sheet of approved conditions must be attached to
plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety
Division.
28. The property owner will maintain a pro-active approach to
the eliminatio�. of graffiti from the structures, fences and
an accessory building, on a daily basis.
f:\planning\resolutn\reso2452
3
• � �
29. For the purpc..�e of providing heating _br any dwelling
proposed, only an energy efficient forced air furnace shall
be used, and that the use of any wall furnace shall be
expressly prohibited.
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
30. Provide document:ation that lots composing the property were
legally subdividled to the satisfaction of the Department of
Public Works. After reviewing the documents, the Department
of Public Works may require the submission and recordation
of a parcel �r+ap.
31. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered
Civil Engineer. Property is located within 100 year flood
zone area. Pad elevations shall be 1 foot above flood level
zone per flood Yioundary map. Also conform to all applicable
codes per Sect�ion 12 1/2 of Lynwood Municipal"Code.
Building above flood level will require substantial amount
of fill, therefore, suggest alternative methods of design to
minimize amount of livable space at ground level.
32. Reconstruct curb and gutter and required pavement in
frontage of pro��erty along Louise Avenue (Cut sheet must be
provided prior t:o the actual work.
33.. Reconstruct damziged sidewalk along Louise Avenue.
34. Reconstruct dam.aged and substandard drive approach(es), per
City standards.
35. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected
separately. Construct laterals as necessary.
36. Install two (2) 24' box street trees per City of Lynwood
standards along Louise Avenue.
37. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass.
38. Provide and ins�all one (1) marbelite street pole with light
fixture, under�ground services and conduits along Louise
Avenue.
39. Underground all utilities.
40. A permit from t;he Engineering Division is required for all
' off-site improv�=_ments.
41. All required wa�ter meters, meter service changes and/or fire
protection line:s shall be installed by the developer. The
work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by
the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the
Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any
work.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
No Comment
f:\plarmi ng\reso l ut i on\reso2452
4
�
Section 3!'�`A copy of this resolution hall be delivered
to the applicant.
APPROVED AAiD ADOPTED this day of 1993,
by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Elizabeth Dixon, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sol Blumenfeld, Director Kenneth Fong
Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney
f : \pl emi ng\resol utn\reso2452 .
5
� AGEND�;ITEM I�O. �-
� DATE: February 9, 1993
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
CASE N0. �vP ��s
FROM: Sol B1umE�nfeld, Director�
Communit}� Development Depa tment
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 125
Applicani:: Rick Kesseler
PROPOSAL•
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit
to develop a sixteen (16) unit townhouse development at 4291
Carlin Avenue in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. This item
was continued from the January 12, 1993 Planning Commission
meeting.
FACTS•
1. Source of Autho:rity
Section 25-4.2 �of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that
a Conditional �Use Permit be obtained for any residential
development in 'the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone.
2. Propertv Location:
The site is lacated on the North side of Carlin Avenue
between Atlant3c Avenue and Waldorf Drive. (Refer to the
attached location map)
3. Pronertv size:
The site consists of a rectangular shaped lot, approximately
41,539 square feet (101' x 411') in size.
4. Existina Land Use:
The property is currently a vacant lot. The surrounding
' lar�d uses are as follows:
North - Single-Family Residential
South - Mixture. of Residential
East - Trailex Park
West - Vacant Care Facility
5. Land Use Desiv�ation:
The General Plan Designation for the subject property is
Townhouse & Cluster Housing while the Zoning Classification
is R-2. The surrounding land use designations are as
follows:
General. Plan Zoning
North - Sirigle-Family Residential North - R-1
South - ToFrnhouse & Cluster Housing South - R-2
East - ToGinhouse & Cluster Housing East - R-2
West - ToFinhouse & Cluster Housing West - R-2
f:\steffrpt\cup725-1
1
� �
� 6. Proiect Characteristics
The applicant p:roposes to develop sixteen (16) units in a
cluster of four (4) structures keeping with the General Plan
designation of '.Cownhouse and Cluster Housing. All units
within the deve].opment will consist of the same floor plan.
The units will k�e two-story with three bedrooms and two and
one half bathro��ms and will be approximately 1,300 sq. ft.
Each unit will have an attached two-car garage and the
development wil.l provide four (4) guest parking spaces.
The development provides public open space at the rear of
the site of appxoximately 3,500 sq. ft. which will contain
such amenities as benches, barbecue equipment, and play
equipment.
The project as ;proposed will be a townhouse development as
each unit will be targeted for individual sale and
ownership. Furthermore, the applicant is requesting a 25�
density bonus.that would enable the development of sixteen
(16) units. Thea maximum number of units allowed on the site
without the density bonus would be thirteen (13) units and
although 13 uni�ts would be the maximum, the site is able to
accommodate 16 tirhile still meeting the development standards
as required b;t the Zoning Code. In order to mitigate
proposed increased density, Staff recommended increased
landscaping reqiairements including the use of 24" box trees
throughout the ��roject. The site design provides 27 percent
landscaping.
Approval of the density bonus would require that 25� of the
units be targeted for sale as low to moderate income
, housing. Three (3) units will be low income and one (1) will
be moderate i:ncome housing pursuant to State Housing
Guidelines. The: density bonus provides an opportunity for
the City to me:et the Regional Housing Needs Assessment
requirements (RHNA) mandated by the State of California
Housing and Cotnmunity Development (HCD), and the Southern
California Asso�ciation of Governments (SCAG).
, The Planning Commission at the January 12, 1992, meeting,
made comments and recommendations relative to the design of
the project and continued the item so that the applicant
would be able to address the concerns raised by the Planning
Commission. TYie Commission directed the applicant to work
with Staff in revising the project design. In addition,
Staff sent the applicant a letter reiterating the concerns
' expressed by the Planning Commission. The applicant stated a
preference to maintain the project design as was submitted
for considerat:�on at the January 12, 1993, meeting and is
seeking apprc>val on the same design. The Planning
Commissions sought to revise the design relative to building
massing, building articulation, the amount of open space and
the location of visitor parking.
7. Site Plan Review:
On December 23, 1992, the Site Plan Review Committee
evaluated the>. proposed development and established
conditions for the proposal and deemed it appropriate for
the site.
8. Zonina Enforcement Historv:
On November 11, 1992, The Code Enforcement Division sent the
applicant a not:ice in reference to the amount excess debris
and overgrown vegetation on the site.
f:\staffrpt\cup125-1
2
� �
On November 30, 1992, Code Enforcement sent the applicant a
letter of non-•compliance regarding the above as the
applicant did not respond to the November 11th letter.
The applicant cnrrected and complied with Code Enforcement
by the Site Plan Review meeting of December 23, 1992.
9. Public Resbonse:.
At the Planning Coaunission meeting of January 12, 1993, Dr.
Charles Floyd spoke in opposition to the project. Block
Watch Co-Captai�, Henry Sims also spoke in opposition to the
project. Dr. Floyd expressed concern relative to a proposed
initiative that would affect the potential acquisition and '
use of an adjace:nt property.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
1. Consistencv witYi General Plan
The proposed larid use is consistent with the existing zoning
classification (R-2), and the General Plan designation, Town
House and Cluster Housing. Therefore, granting Conditional
Use Permit No. 125, will not adversely affect the General
Plan.
2. Site Suitabilitti�
The subject property is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the proposed development relative to the
proposed densit,y; bulk of the structures; parking; walls,
fences; driveways, and other development features required
by the Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, the subject property
is adequately s�erved with the required public utilities and
offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility.
3. Comoliance with Develooment Standards
The proposed development meets all the development standards
required by tkie Zoning Ordinance regarding off-street
parking; front:, and rear yard setbacks; lot coverage,
height, unit si:ze; and 25$ density bonus.
4. Comoatibilitv
The proposed project will be located in a neighborhood that
has substantia].ly transitioned from single-family to two-
family residences. Located to the north are single-family
residential use:s. Properties located to the south, east,
an3 west are developed as single-family/multi-family
residential res;pectively.
5. Public HearinQ
On January 12, 1993, The Planning Commission heard testimony
on C.U.P. No. :125 and moved to continue the item to allow
the applicant the opportunity to redesign the project to
create better building articulation, open space, and visitor
parking.
6. Conditions of Approval
The improvements proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have
a negative e1'fect on the values of the surrounding
properties or i.nterfere with or endanger the health,
safety or welfare.
f:\ataffrpt\tup125•7
3
� � �
7. Benefits to Communit
Development of the site has the potential to enhance the
neighborhood and act as a catalyst to foster other quality
developments. Furthermore, the development will add to the
City's housing :�tock in conformance with the policies of the
Housing Element of the General Plan.
8. Environmental Assessment
The Community Development Department Staff has determined
that the projec�t is categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15061 B(3) of �the State of California Environmental Quality
Act of 1989 as amended.
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff attempted to work with the applicant to redesign the
project pursuant to Planning Commission direction relative to
building massinq, a�-ticulation, open space and visitor parking.
However, the applicant is unwilling to prepare a revised design.
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the
Commission disapprove the project based upon the applicants lack
of response to the Planning Commission recommendation to
revise the project design.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map
f:steffrpt:cup725-1
4
� � �
�
w ..
�
�o c� - rioN �nA�
i ,.., - _--- _ _ � :• . .,--.--; .. „ —�, :. cn z
� �--�- ,� Ji � �
• ' � i O Y ��_�� ; i ..r S _,.H = •`-C ^ '.YL � � � ' y � t y.
'Tf' �J � s ]I - i0, � - !9"' '/1" ,01" # 7 � �
p .�• + J , 7tq A t 7 7 . i�� ,� �, �� i � ,.i �� �„ ��� �� � �� �:
� Lr�y l N I Q � � AVENUE .
r , i i nr I fii. , �• ^ ia � � i� si n To � �a� ��7 -`' '� �� � i�in �n ��
�• �. I �� I: .�j � Y ; 3 ' ; :n � � I.
;I' o� � I ��''� � a ' i 30 T9 76 h • a � � wl
zi �i i i i i a ;^ � 76 � � � �"�t' i •i.
i � '� b ��.,I " . so' A z � j�
' nr �,i v� � �si.� V i � ti v i w i � ' v�_l��!�� 1LCVT.
'���ry c��.. ° I Ip1w� H N ' x ��•� a(� •�
u j �`'_ � ' i 17 .l /9�lO Y � ( � R
i i I
> .�w. � � �"�I ` ' I � > ;^ n, � �, n
� � h I I�
a r �. � �� t� ° ti j �� t t.
�, �,.. s�r � p,,��f, �� p NILANO '„�g�(; � s., �
B � • � , I ~ J � Y JO f0 O I11 r N 1 11 ��
. . � i11 `/� //�I/rC I JJ i �• h ,' _��, mr �6 _,JL- 't
C� \w\1,1 � � � t� Si 7'% j 1 • �� �
rt s ; ���,. /6 a i5' 'u /J �l l/' l0 � 9 , e 1 1 �. �. � � � ��
p- ,�.
� � ,�� �o ,, ,.,. q R � * �
c w r ri Yo , t vs i,.
ALVADA ; ST. „ ',. , , i .� •Z i
� ,
, , � „ f, „„ i; � I I I � ' w �� i
il ^, � 4 � I ' � '� \.
F .� 17� 77 IS Ii. ;i�• � �� Ix S b�� � ;i ` j
„ � 'r i3 � I � � �
t�r � n. �n �� o,�i,. �71 � i � � �__ ----{.-
� r � a= ��6� i I a � � � � A �L-__ ---i
I ,i�s C� /7 . � � � � 1 I: "
^ 0
'1� •.ii� ♦ I I � af � �� 1 _� �I
,; � „�� � � � I('7�a. � i ii'7
�N Lp 2 ` " / ��`o � � � I6� I A � � iI� J I �
� � � 1 J i �
� ^ /9 � Q,'� 0��1 �` LI
�Qm er ( � ( • (��n i Y�
; I C "v j °�,� a � '� � a �' �? ' y • i
r �� T/7 ` �1� . 7 � i� i � ,�� �; .� � � i �
ii9 /N .Y fo I � � r. • i
' G� R � i � � ; ._ .. AVENUE '
n 9 r7 u.ir �s.�z �af, riao _ y �► •� � f'��
' � i = � � 9 0 w 0 ' �'� �' _
� l ' 3 • / ' l ! �a 60 1 � ;
��. C > > y �s • � �' :�_ Z � :
Z W �_ i� •
• . W �
' � ` �+ � _ > > ;, P . --�iJ -, a :
� ;: Y�N � ; „7 .,.w � ,� 6 a a _nL� � �_-sb__�^ J
a
� Z
5 �� 5 ,,.�� � ti 66 ,� •
fi:;, o n.n ,�� Y' - 3l... i�«
,, a ,.«r 6 a ie
� � ,,.,, ��',�,.t 6 � � �
' , 8 63 1 W ' �
,, :, �.i�• .;.w � 4' i ,' � —"
� �': � V w�T�Li� � �
�.0. � � ••• �
fi.i; 9 ».
� ~ z «
� � ai o
:,; , : �o ��. _ �, , b �
:s, � � ,
�; n ,�. �p �j � �e ,o+
_ ,--.��__ � . � J �
��.. �
1 :1
�; � �
. AGENDA ITEM N0.
DATE: February 9, 1993 CASE N0 . zD A Z� '
TO: PLANNING CUMMISSION
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director 4�2.,
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Zonin OrdYnance Amendment Case No. 28
List Of ADi �loVed RoofiAC Materials For
Inclusion :[n List of Citv Buildina Standards
PROPOSAL•
Staff is proposing to amend Chapter 25, the official Zoning
Ordinance, adding �to Section 25-4-5b, a list of "Approved"
roofing materials as part of City's Building Standards. .
FACTS•
1. Staff and the F�lanning Commission have determined that the
roofing materials to be used for new construction,
remodeling and additions to existing dwelling be selected
from a list of "Approved" roofing materials as part of the
Development Standards City Wide.
2. A survey of x•oofing materials on existing residential
� structures in L City reveals that a majority of roofing
materials are shake shingles, asphalt shingles and crushed
rocks for aparY.ment dwellings, while most of single family
residents have wood shake shingles and Mission "S" tile.
3. The Planning Commission had indicated and determined
eliminating the use of inexpensive and unattractive roofing
materials for new residential constructions City Wide.
4. At its regularly scheduled meeting on September 8, 1992, the
Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed
ordinance to City Council.
ISSUES AND ANALYSZS:,
The intent of the amendment is to discourage and eliminate the
use of inexpensive and unattractive roofing materials often being
used by developers .in an attempt to cut construction costs. In
recent years, housing development has included roofing materials
that are non confonming to the esthetic appearance of the homes
in the surrounding neighborhoods. Upon implementation of the
ordinance, it wilY be possible to enhance new residential
development by requiring complimentary roof material from list of
Approved Roofing Mat:erials.
It is important to note that roofing materials come in a variety
of colors which should compliment the color and architecture of
the building. Stalf and the Planning Commission reviewed and
examined various roofing materials from major tile, slate, and
shingle roof manufactures relative to the quality, duration and
Class "A" fire requi.rements for non-combustion.
f:\plenning\staffrpt\zoa28pc
1
� �
The City Senior Bui.lding Inspector reviewed and approved the
roofing material list relative to meeting the standards and
requirements by U.B.C. 1992 edition. All roofing materials
listed on the "Approved' list may be used for re-roofing over an
existing roof. However, engineering calculations may be required
to determine that an existing roof is designed to accommodate the
weight of new roofing'.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff respectfully re:quest that after consideration, the Planning
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2457.
1. Finding tYaat the Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case No.
ZOA 28 will not have a significant effect on the
environment and certifying the negative declaration as
adequate.
2. Approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case No. ZOA 28,
subject to the stated conditions and requirements on
list of approved roofing materials for inclusion in the
developmenl� standard.
ATTACHMENTS•
1. Resolution No. 2457
2. List of Approved Roofing Materials
f:\plarming\staffrpt\zoa28pc
2
� � �
, RESOLUTION NO. 2457
A RESOIsUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AMENDING CHAPTER
25 SEC'TION 25-4.5b THE OFFICIAL ZONING
ORDINANCE, OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO LIST OF
APPROVED ROOFING MATERIAIS FOR INCLUSION
IN THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARD
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
did, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on a proposed
amendment to the Lynwood Municipal Code with respect to the
above subject; and
WHEREAS, The Ci.ty Planning Commission wishes to further the
goals of the General Plan to eliminate aspects of the City's
image which are les�; desirable; and
WHEREAS, The F�lanning Commission of the City of Lynwood
wishes to eliminate the use of inexpensive and unattractive
roofing materials; amd
WfiEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined
that no substantial environmental impact will result from the
proposed amendment; and therefore, a Negative Declaration has
been prepared and is on file in the Community Development
Department and the ciffice of the City Clerk.
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines as follours:
A. The propased amendment will be consistent with the
objectives and the dlevelopment policies of the City of Lynwood.
B. The propo:�ed amendment will not adversely affect the
General Plan.
C. The proposed amendment will further the aesthetic
appearance of the Ci.ty of Lynwood.
Section 2. The: Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations,
hereby recommends City Council adoption of the proposed
amendment.
APPROVED AND A}�OPTED this day of , 1993,
by the members of t�e Planning Commission voting as follows:
f:�pleming\resolutn\reso2457
� �
f AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Elizabeth Dixon
Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sol Blumenfeld, Director Kenneth Fong
Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney
f:\plaming\resoLutn\reso2457
'.,, ,� AGENDAI�EM N0. S
DATE: February 9, 1993 �ASE N0 . � P � °� �
TO: PLANNING Ci�MMISSION
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director,�
Community :Development Depar ent
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE :PARCEL MAP NO. 23661- CASE NO. TPM 27
Applicant: Jorge Quirate
PROPOSAL•
The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map No.
23661 for the purpose of combining portions of lots 61 and 62,
of Tract 10634 into one (1) parcel, and to satisfy conditions
under Resolution No. 2437 at 11271 Wright Road in the R-3 (Multi-
Family Residential) zone. Condition 30, under the resolution,
requires that the lots comprising the property be legally tied.
FACTS
1. Source of Autho:ritv
Section 25-18,. Subdivision Regulations of the Lynwood
Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act, Government Code
Section 66411, requires that a parcel map be recorded for
the subdivision,/combining of parcels.
2. Pronertv Locati�on.
The property is located between Martin Luther King, Jr.
Boulevard at thie south and Beechwood Avenue at the north,
and is approxianately 11,425.30 (60.01' x 190.39') square
feet in size. (�See attached location map).
3. Existincr
The parcel cur:rently contains an existing dwelling unit.
The uses surrou:nding the parcel consist of the following:
North - Multiple Family Residential
South - Single Family Residential
East - Industrial/School
West - Single Family/Multiple Family Residential
4. Land Use Desian,ation
The General Plzin designation for the property is Multiple
Family Residential and the Zoning Classification is R-3
The surrounding land use designations are as follows:
General PLan Zoning
North - Multiple Family Residential R-3
South - Multiple Family Residential R-3
East - Industrial M
West - Multiple Family Residential R-3
f:\pleming\staffrpt\tpm27
1
� �
5. Project Charact.eristics
The applicant ;proposes to combine portions of two lots in
order to meet requirements under the approved Conditional
Use Permit No. 116 (CUP 116) and Resolution No. 2437.
Condition No. '_�0, under the resolution, requires that lots
comprising the property be legally tied to the satisfaction
of the Department, thus the purpose of this application.
The subject s:ite contains an existing dwelling and is
approved for development of a duplex under Resolution No.
2437.
6. Site Plan Revie
At its regular meeting on January 28, 1993, the Site Plan
Review Commit�tee recommended approval of the proposed
tentative para.l map to the Planning Commission subject to
conditions and requirements.
ANALYSIS AND CC�NCLUSION
Staff analysis of this proposed, subdivisions include the
following finclings: (a) environmental assessment of the
proposed site; and (b) Consistency of the proposed site with
the General Plam.
The design of t:he proposed parcel map shows that the parcel
is in charac•ter with the existing multiple family
residential dev�elopments in the area.
The proposal i:s intended to permit combination of portions
of two (2) lot:s into one (1) parcel in order to allow
better utilizat:ion of the property.
Environmental P�ssessment.
The Community I�evelopment Department has determined that the
project could not have a significant effect on the
environment. Therefore, a Notice of Exemption has been
prepared and is on file in the Community Development
Department and the office of the City Clerk.
Consistency Of The Site With The General Plan
a. The proposed project is compatible with the City's
General Pl.an Land Use Goal 4. which encourages new
patterns o:F land uses which...offer opportunities for
the compat:ible development of vacant and underutilized
parcels.
b. The size a:nd location of the proposed project does not
significan�tly impact the character of the existing
environment: or surrounding land uses.
c. The propos�ed subdivision is consistent with the Zoning
Classificat:ion for minimum lot sizes in the R-3 zone and
the Gene�ral Plan designation Multiple Family
Residential..
f\plarming\staffrept\f:tpm27
2
� �
RECOMMENDATION(S):
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2462.
1. Certifying that. the project is categorically exempt from the
provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by
Section 15061 ��(3).
2. Approving Tenta.tive Parcel Map No. 26, subject to the stated
conditions and requirements.
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Resolution No. 2462
3. Tentative Parcel Map No. 23661
f:�ptaming\staffrpt\tpm27
3
1
�. �. ..,... . ._ ._ _ ... .... :�
. ... ..._.,__..
�. ..___...... .
l _ ,._____ . . ._ . _._ ... •
� �� � �� �
l .
�'�
LOCA TION iUl�►P � .
-- . �_-
_ o_ _v. .vc.— -:-- �u� ° >
. �� � �
\� '�.
+�„ r' ,, „ » o � , s ' � ^
��p i-' q` �,°�n_:` 3�ei� �s�=�urec`' O � 3
,� _ _��� �
e .,o. .
" o �iio $ v.a� oew�.o ' i .... � ,S�>�:,�..�,
/7 �i„� � ; � ne 'I � $� „n,� R ^ ..1
—t_____ �.
/O ",.: e N iur ?71 �J:n` �� �� � 1 �
• oae.r .:ueu p::� ,, � �
� n"" o ;;;:: '� i ���.:: Se ,.yc� �� 3
V b p � � '
�n �_ lLdl__ 6d _L i50�1'.n^ O , ` W
/Q V IA2ll� �T I�I ��.���, W
� � .�,o ,o,,�r o r �
� f. is i;;;� � e o zoa-67---r — e�aa: -- � OC .
as � � Q,
u�.< _ roasi:� _ L---- � � i .
/d ��r _ _ � „�.� � ,
. '�/,� � . /� iso � 6� rso.n _..L"�' � q li; . Sfi��E�f.�oti . 1\
. �,�,. �i l
' — — — T — . Joa.c/
/l °ni t r iso�,ia� v�� I \
L �.,__—__-..
�� o — - � uo�i � o � '"� ` �J
_ _ _ _// -- -- iay_
—L bi ��9. �o _ � ^ eo'� a
o j,� l f s 6� ,� C l T Y A � � !I o
y - — - ��ri�.� � : � o '�';�' . �--,--� ✓ _ 1 .
tar E �" o � �� 62 ia
I.+TfoTio� T —tl_z15?_—_L�___' / ��� I .�
� � I ❑�... �iw .no l,J9l / , ...
; 3 �._ � �.,,�, 6� � 1
� c I. �' —�- �.� .':�— �� tc»cv y �� .� �.
" �T�4fI � � � ..�r• � � .�i.y e'� P
: - �� , ;�
4� T n)eo�� JS.Sa o .
i � ♦ � `w
I70/ IN.� •.
; � 6a — �to - 6p ,�,o, �� o .`'�
i: I ''' �'° L__� ��i>. ��$ ia ixi.: o . ,1P'
�= i� I o �,.. o �.�.c� �f�.ee ,n,� �- M `
• n, " I $ �n,i �—,
n
i ��� <
/! � i : � A ..�,.v S� n „ �; s �' a �� J ScN�
.., . , �e !f U .>e. �, � L' �yILL .. �.
' _ R — � — _ � � o g 1, e. ,� SLSd ir�rz _ !r:
— � L..�,,,,, 1�y /fl��
� /YIi' $ � „ �n � �f0 � /00
.. �'—� _ $ — %fl.17t — TU it/fIS•���i ~ ' vM r l � '
, ro ��" ; $ unt � •v� � b ��S 1
- ---- � ` �n.K _�_—�3�L— � 1 .
-�� ..,, ry � ,.,.
� /S ii�.. `� �.�.. �.n �l 7 � "°° �
rt � Y �?'�1 — 1 — 1�J. � _ �p ti / � //I.I
� � — �...i �5�5 �.s.i � i�t� t� .
�„ , J $ i ,�
.
�s o �
�� y' V �,v__�! .47 _ Jf.f � 'o
�.. i50 !lS.�
,��u � -u � V .
, �' i��ci Y � c. . ,v�
�n�.. � SS 11 � 1���.
.'� H� OJ.d �, s
' M! IJ �11N \ o o � I'
, _ _ — /j � /K I
� ,_1 _�,� _� SO , � .°. ?� �• , a
� _ _ ` _ -ti �.�1'�� w, le � , �i Z "�
' I ♦ .. „ur � �
s+�a�r�• .r� ���� �� `ON I � I __.� �r Ib ` ^ 1 M �• 1y .
!' fr-j M SD /) . 4b
� � O� "1 b �. � � w...�.
Ll . '
Q;�, � ",
��' ,
1��
(�%
�. . 1
i't':, ,
i!.
��
\.
'�..
1�': i
f '.
•� .
1 �
�y CASE Nc�. � ���' -..:
�.:
--- . � .
:� � �
� RESOLUTION NO. 2462
i
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.
23661 TO COMBINE PORTIONS OF LOTS 61
AND 62 OF TRACT 10634 IN THE COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA , AS
PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 165 PAGES 40
AND 42 INCLUSIVE OF THE MAPS, IN THE
OFF:ICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUI3TY .
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject
application; and
WHEREAS, i:he Community Development Director has
determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of
the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended; and
WHEREAS, �the Planning Commission has carefully
considered all pertinent testimony offered in the case as
presented at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, t:he preparation, filing and recordation of
• Parcel Map is required for development; and
Section 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find
and determine that:
, A. The subdiv:ision meets all the applicable requirements
and condii�ions imposed by the State Subdivision Map
Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the Lynwood
Municipal Code.
B. The proposed subdivision of lots is consistent with
the appliaable elements of the General Plan and the
Official Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lynwood.
C. Proper and reasonable provisions have been made for
adequate i.ngress and egress to the subdii�ision of the
lot.
D. Proper and adequate provisions have been made for all
public utilities and. services.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 23661 in the R-3
(Multi-Family Residential) zone, subject to the following
conditions.
COMMiJN:CTY DEVEIAPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments.
2. The applicani:, or his representative, shall sign a
Statement of Acceptance stating that he has read,
understands, zind agrees to the conditions imposed by the
Planning Com�nission, prior to issuance of building
permits.
f : \pl ami ng\resol utn\resd462
1
,� �
PLANNING DIVISION
3. Within twenty-four (24) months after approval or
conditional a�pproval of Tentative Parcel Map, the
subdivider shaill file with the City of Lynwood, a
Final Map, substantially or conditionally approved, and
in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act and the
Subdivision Regulations of the City of Lynwood.
4. Extension of the Tentative Map approval shall only
be considere�i if the applicant or his/her
representative, submits a written request for extension
to the Community Development Department stating the reasons
for the request, at least thirty (30) days before map
approval is due. to expire, pursuant to, and in compliance
with, Section 25-18, of the subdivision regulations of the
City of Lynwood.
5. The Final Parcel Map shall be filed with the City Engineer
of the City of Lynwood..
6. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in
sanitary condition upon approval of the Tentative Parcel
Map and pending any proposed development, and shall be
maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times.
DEPAF2TMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ENGZNEERING
7. All conditio�ns of the State Map Act and the City's
Subdivision Ordinance must be met prior to recordation.
All matters anci improvements shall be consistent with the
ordinances, standards, and procedures of the City's
Development Standards, and Planting Standards of the
Department of Parks and Recreation.
The Developer :is responsible for checking with staff for
clarification of these requirements.
8. Submit a Subdivision Guarantee to this office.
The Final Map shall be based on a field survey. All
surveying for t.he proposed development will be done by the
Developer, including the establishment of centerline ties.
Enclose with the Final Map the surveyor's closure sheets.
9. Developer sh<ill pay all applicable development fees
including drainage, sewer, water and parkway trees prior to
issuance of any building permits.
Pay Parcel Map checking fees prior to checking.
Pay $100 monument checking fee prior to recordation.
Deposit $50 with City Engineer to guarantee receipt by City
of recorded, reproducible mylar, parcel map prior to
recordation.
All special as:�essments and utilities or sewer connection
fees are to be paid prior to recording the final map. All
requirements to the serving utilities to be met or
guarantee prior to recording of the final map.
f:\planning\resolutn\reso2462
2
� �
10. Gradina and Drainina
A grading plan signed by a registered Civil Engineer shall
be submitted for the approval of the Director of Public
Works/City Engineer and the Director of Community
Development. mhe grading plan shall include the topography
of all contiguous properties and streets and shall provide
for the methcids of drainage in accordance with all
applicable Cit:y standards. Retaining walls and other
protective measures may be required. Offsite drainage
easements may kie necessary. The structural section of all
parking areas shall be designed by a Civil Engineer based
upon soils ana:Lysis supplied by a recognized and approved
soils engineer:ing firm. The structural section shall be
approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. In
the event that: the design is not provided, the minimum
structural section that will be approved by the Director of
Public Works/City Engineer would be 2 inches of asphalt on
4 inches on untreated rock base.
Submit to this office a Geologic/Soils Report signed by a
Registered Soils Engineer.
11. Sewers
The developmerit shall be provided with public sewers.
Connect to public sewer. Provide laterals as necessary.
Design of all sanitary sewers shall be approved by the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
12. Water Svstems
The Developer shall construct a water system including
water services, fire hydrants and appurtenances through the
development eis required by the Director of Public
Works/City Eng:ineer. The Developer shall submit a water
system plan to the City of Lynwood Fire Department for fire
hydrant locations. The City will install water meters
only. Payment for said meters shall be made to the City
prior to issuance of building permits. The Developer shall
install on-site: water facilities including stubs for water
meters and fi:re hydrants on interior and on boundary
arterial streets.
All conditions of the Lynwood Fire Department must be met
prior to recordation.
13. Public Easements and Right-of-Way
Where drainage, sewer and other such easements are
required, the minimum easement width shall be ten (10) feet
to facilitate aiaintenance unless otherwise approved by the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
14. Sidewalks
Design, configuration and locations shall be subject to the
approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, and
the Director of Community Development. Ramps for
physically hanciicapped persons shall be provided both on-
site and off-site as required by State and local
regulations.
f:\pl am i ng\reso lut�\resd462
3
� �
15. Dust Control and Pedestrian Safetv
Prior to the issuance of demolition or grading permits, the
developer shall:
1. Submit a plan indicating safety methods to be provided
to maintai.n safe pedestrian ways around all areas of
constructi.on. This may require proper and adequate
signs, fences, barricades, or other approved control
devices as required by the Director of Community
Development.
16. The Developer shall install all public improvements, as
required by tY.ie Director of Public Works/City Engineer
prior to issuance of any occuvancy permits for this
development. Public Improvements shall include but are not
limited to:
a. Reconstruc:t damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter, drive
approach and required pavement along Wright Road.
b. Znstall i:wo (2) 24" box street trees per City of
Lynwood standards along Wright Road.
All changes and repairs in existing curbs, gutters, and
sidewalks and other public improvements shall be paid for
by the develope:r. If improvements are to be guaranteed, a
faithful performance bond shall be posted by the developer
to guarantee installation of said public improvements and
an agreement fc�r completion of improvements with the City
Council shall k�e entered into. Submit Policy of Insurance
or bond protecting City against damage or injury to persons
or property growing out of, related to, or resulting from
improvements os work. The Director of Public Works/City
Engineer will d.etermine amount and form. Deposit with the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer before commencing
any improvements, a sum estimated by the Director of Public
Works/City Engineer to cover cost of inspection of all
improvements under his jurisdiction.
Additional requirements, per Resolution No. 2437 items No.
34, 35, 36, 37, 38, and 39 are part of this TPM conditions.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
NO COMMENT
f:�planning\resolutn�resd462
4
,'
r �'� �
Section :t. A copy of this resolution shall be
delivered to the applicant.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1993, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Elizabeth Dixon,
Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sol Blumenfeld, Dire:ctor Kenneth Fong
� Community Developmernt Department City Attorney
f:\plaming\resolutn\reso2462
5
f f� �,
CITY OF LYNWOOD RB-ROOFINd ,
BIIILDZNG DEPARTMSI'1'1' �QQI��NTB
YHEM EMGIMEERIMC REOUIRED
MANUFACTURE STYLE I.C.B.O. NEIGMT OF TEAR OFF RE-lOOF
MVRVL M11T'l. �R
yp. O(IST'G
TES MO lES MO
Cal - Shake - 2882 5.6 PSF • No Tes -
��� - 4312 �.S PSF - No 1ea -
Eagle Capistreno 4660 9.5 PSF 11es - Yes -
�� � � Malibu " 9.5 PSF Yes - Yes -
�� Belair " 10.0 75F Yea - �es -
�� � Porderosa " 10.0 PSF Yes - Yea -
Eaglelite Capistrano L660 6.5 PSP Yes - Yes -
�� Malibu " 6.0 PSF - No Tes -
�� 8elair " 7.0 PSF Yes - Tes -
�� Porderosa " 7.0 PSF Tes • Tn -
Hardishake - 4425 6.0 VSF - No Yea -
, (uturoied
�� - • 4.5 ' No 1'es -
(evy.mors)
Life Tile Santa Fe Mission 2656P 8.9 PSF Tes - Yes -
�� Sheke Capri " 9.5 VSF Yes - Tes -
. �� Smtry " 9.5 PSF Yes - Yea -
�� Light Tile Espeina " 6.0 PSF • No Yes -
Maxtile - 3682 <.0 PSF • No 1'ea -
Monier Rome 2093 9.25 PSF Yes - Yes -
�� Classic "100"' " 9.50 GSP Yea - ►es -
�� Mission "5" ° 9.50 PSF Tes - - Yes -
�� Nomesteed " 9.50 PSf Yes - 1'es -
� ^ Solit Shake �
. Reguler Yeight ':. 10.25 pSF Yes . Te� - - _
Light�reight " 7.25 PSF Yes - Yes -
. �� . .. Ville
, Regula� Yeiyht • 8.0 CSF Yes - Te8 -
Lightweiyht " 5.6 VSF - No Tes -
Martfiachi Lerameics I�roved-5 Tille 4202 10.0 PSF Yes - 1es -
�� Orimtel Tilc " 9.1 PSF Yes - Tes -
^ Super-S Tile " 9.0 i5F res - res -
�� Strai9ht Barrel Missim Tile " 9.1 PSF Yes - Tea -
Sierra Tile Inc. Brushed Shake 2310 11 PSF Tes - Tes -
tal-MOdern " 11 PSF Yes - Yes -
Pioneer - 3748 9.< PSF Yea ' Tea -
U.S.Mission S-Sheped 3523 9.0 PSF Tes - res �
^ Tapered Missi�x� " 10.0 75F Yes - Yes -
�� Ftat Shirqle " 10.0 PSF Yes - Yes -
'�����" �?;� . - . � � 02i09i93 17:1�4 818 8562115 001
t` � �"
ARCHITECTURAL
D•E•5�1•G•N
�
MR. D. MACIAS
DACAMA 6NTfiRPRZS6S t"•O-
6204 CASITAS AVE
BELi, (;A. 90201
PROJfSC7:
11039 LOUISS AYE LYl!IWOOD CA.
ML�BBUARY 9�1993
ATI': ART BARFIELD
CITY OF T.YPIYOOD
113�0 BULLIS ROAD
LYNWOOA CA.
I ean ruquesting an extension for toaay's �eeting, for s
Puture daLe. In order far my client to obtsin s conatrutian
loan. The raquael. ies Por Apri1. 14 1993, or Yuture datc will
be finc.
Thc rcaasou is bescsuse of tuff tiues and city's
requir¢�cnts. For e:xnnple� praviding blook fencee� straat
Itght� cla� tilc rcroP� nnd canLral air units. Ulhiah wcre aot
in the bug6et for t.hia proj�ct.
� �Ep c11enL wislies to built in thie city� I hope
you grefiL his reque:at. T6ank Por your attension.
Sincerilq
� �
Hipolito erreno jr.
Dasigncr
ifi19 W. GARVEY AVE..NORTH SUtTE �1Q7. WEST COVINA, CA 91790 (81!) Obb'-211♦ FAX �61E) 636-2115