HomeMy Public PortalAboutA1993-06-08 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION : ` f � •
� AGENDA
LYNWOOD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING - 7:30 p.m.
City Hall Council Chambers �^�
11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, CA ] _/�.
1 �� 7
� : .
� I ' � �. e �4� !e. iJ j
June 8, 1993 ; ,-�: , _;' L'ii�.•:':i�:,Q. �
1 `'Jli�i i
� "_.. "cJ 1.:,.. )
. ? i
Elizabeth Dixon .��•„•':'°�,��=;�,'-' � .
Chairperson �-'� "� " �
{ 4
/�
Donald Dove Carlton McMil er
Vice Chairman . Commissioner
Errick Lee Roy Pryor
Commissioner Commissioner
Jamal Muhsin I
Commissioner f
I
C O M M I S S I O N C O U N S E L: �
i
Henry S_ Barbosa Kenneth Fong ;
City Attorney Deputy City Attorney i
I
- STAFF: I
� � � �
_ i
Sol Blumenfeld, Director Louis Omoruyi i
Community Development Department Associate Planner
Art Barfield John Oskoui �
Associate Planner Assistant Director I
Public Works i
Louis E. Morales, Jr. , �
Associate Planner �
i
,
i
' I
i
. I
I
. I
I
• ' I
f:�agenda�june93 ' �
I
1 t
, ,
�
i
---- - 1
i �.
� � .
;
June 8, 1993
OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Call meeting to order.
i
, �
B. Flag salute.
� �
C. Roll call of Commissioners. ,
D. Certification of Agenda Posting. �
E. Approval of minutes for the May 11, 1993 Planning Commission Meeting
F. Commissioner Photos. �
PUSLIC HEARING• �
`1. VARIANCE CASE N0. 21
Applicant: Kidney Dialysis {
;
, COMMENTS:
The applicant is requesting a variance to reduce the required'
parking by ten (l0) spaces and to include compact spaces in.
order to partially fulfill the parking requirement of'
thirty-six (36) parking spaces at a existing medical use at
_ 3600-3608 E. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., in the AMD1
(Hospital-Medical-Dental) zone. '
RECOMMENDED ACTION: �
Steff respectfully requests that after consideration, thei
Planning Commission continue this case until the July 13
1993 Planning Commission meeting to.complete'the required'
public notification process.
2. ZONTI�iG ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 31
. Applicantc City of Lynwood
COMMENTS•
To establish a process for the review and approval of �
exterior and/or site design of any new building or structure;
(other than a single-family residence), exterior remodelinga
projects (other than maintenance and repair work), and
commercial signs located within the City of Lynwood. ;
, ,
� RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the�,
Planning Commission approve the attached Resolution No. 2474.'.
A. Certifying that the Zoning Ordinance Amendment No". 31 is�
categorically exempt from the provision of State CEQA:
Guidelines as amended by Section 15061b(3).
B: Recommend that the City Council approve.the findings in,
Resolution No. 2474, waive the reading and introduce the•
proposed ordinance.
a
. � � t:�agenda\june93 � � � � -. , �
, 2
,;
�
;
�, CONTINUED PUBLIC �ING: •
,a � � � ,
3. VARIANCE CASE N0. 18
Applicant: Ray N. Contreras
COMMENTS: �
The applicant is requesting a Variance to reduce the required
lot widths from 50 feet to 35.36 feet with a 20.64 foot
radius along the north property line, and 47.22 feet along
the south property line in order to develop a single family
' dwelling on a parcel at 4050 Louise Avenue in the R-1 (Single
Family Residential) 2one.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: �
J
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the;
Planning Commission approve the Variance request:
,
A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from _
the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by
Section 15061b(3). •
�• B. Approving Variance Case No. 18, subject to the stated
' conditions and requirements. ;
C. Finding that strict or literal inter-pretation and
- enforcement of the Municipal Code would deprive the
applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
properties in the same zone. '
^ 4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 125 '
Applicantc Rick Kessler
COMMENTS:
�
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use'
Permit to develop a sixteen (16) unit townhouse development
at 4291 Carlin Avenue in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential)
zone. This item was continued from the January 12, 1993,
Planning Commission meeting. � ;
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ,
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2461.
A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from
the provision of State CEQA Guidelines as amended by
Section 15061b(3).
B. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 125 subject to.
the stated conditions and requirements.
p
5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 126
Applicant: Tarcicio Vasquez ,
;� COMMENTS•
�
The applicant is requesting a ConditionaI Use Permit to
establish and operate an automobile sales lot at 11605 Long
Beach Boulevard in the,C-2A (Medium Commercial) zone; ,
i .
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ;
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the;
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2463. ;,
• �
' A.. .Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from
the provision of State CEQA Guidelines as amended by
Section 15061b(3).
_ f:\agendaUune93 " . � . . . � .
3
;
�
_; B. Approving �ditional Use Permit No. •6, subject to the
`� stated conditions and requirements.
6. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 127
Applicant: Nathaniel Robenson ^
COMMENTS• '
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to develop a 13,500 square feet, two (2) story
commercial building with office rental space and retail
stores at the northwest corner of Atlantic Avenue and Olanda
Avenue, in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: �
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the
Planning Commission continue this case until the July 13;
1993 Planning Commission meeting to permit completion of the
public notification process and per the applicant's request.
7. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP CASE NO. 28 �
' Applicant: Nathaniel Robenson
' COMMENTS:
�
j The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Parcel
Map to consolidate three (3) parcels into one (1) lot in
order to allow for the development of a 13,500 square feet;
two (2) story commercial building at the northwest corner of
Atlantic Avenue and Olanda Avenue in the R-3 (Multi-Family
Residential) zone.
, i
RECOMMENDED ACTION: '
r
Staff respectfully'requests that after.consideration, the
Planning Commission continue this case until the July 13J
1993 Planning Commission meeting to permit completion of the
public notification process and per the applicant's request.�
;
8. GENERAL PLAN - CASE NO. 6 �
Applicant: Nathaniel Robenson
COMMENTS` '
The applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment to1`
chanqe the Plan designation from Multi-Family Residential to
Commercial, ia order to develop a two-story, 13,500 square "
feet commercial building on parcels approximately 29,643
square feet size, at the northwest corner of Olanda Street
' and Atlantic Avenue. ,
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
�
_ Sfaff respectfully requests that after consideration, the
Planning Commission continue this case until the July 13,
1993 Planning Commission meeting to permit completion of the
public notification process and per the applicant's request.
a �
. 9. ZONE CHANGE — CASE NO. 6 '
Applicant: Nathaniel Robenson _
COMMENTS• .
The applicant is requesting a Zone Change from R-3 (Multi-,
Family Residential) zone to C-2 (Light Commercial) zone, in
order to develop a two-story, 13,500 square feet CommerciaS ,
Building on parcels approximately 29,643 square feet•size, at
the northwest corner of Olanda Street and Atlantic Avenue.
. .f:\agenda\june93 � - �� � '�
'r
4
i
, ?
�` � RECOMMENDED AC� N: •
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the�
Planning Commission continue this case until the July 13,�
1993 Planning Commission meeting to permit completion of the'
Public notification. �
a .
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS �
None
�
�
STAFF COMMENTS
;
• Fence Ordinance Proposed Revision j
- • Move-on Ordinance Proposal
• Commissioner Haynes resignation. i
COMMENTS: �
PUBLIG ORALS , .
'
COMMISSION ORALS �
i
ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the regular meeting of the Planninq Commission on July:
13, 1993 at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall Council Chambers, 11330
Bullis Road, Lynwood, California. i
I
i
- . �
, �
,
� , �
�, � fi\agendaUune93 . �
1
r .
�
5 i
� ��.$ ' � � �
��
LYNWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 11. 1993
The Lynwood City Planning Commission met in a Regular Session in
' the Council Chambers of Lynwood City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road ori
the above date at 7:30 p.m.
, � � �
Chairperson Dixon presiding.
Commissioners Dove, Muhsin, Pryor, Lee and Dixon answered the
roll call. j`
,
It was moved by Commissioner Lee, seconded by Commissioner Muhsiri
,
and carried to excuse Commissioner McMiller.
Director of Community Development Sol Blumenfeld stated the
Agenda had been duly posted in accordance with The Brown Act.
' Zt was then moved by Commissioner Pryor, seconded by Commissioner
� Lee to approve the following minutes:
a) Regular Meeting, April 13, 1993 �
,
ROLL CALL .
AYEB: COMMISSIONER DOVE� MUHSIN� PRYOR� LEE� DIXON '
NOES: NONE '
AB3ENT: COMMISSIONER HAYNES� MCMZLLER "
PUBLIC HEARING !
Director of Community Development Blumenfeld introduced the first
item on the agenda, a Public Hearing Variance Case #17. Stated
applicant, Gil Moya is requesting variance to allow reduction of
the required lot widths from 50 feet to 45.1 on the west property
` line and 20.71 feet with a 22.23 foot radius on the east property.
line in order to develop a single family dwelling on a parcel at
the northwest corner of Vieta Avenue at Fernwood Avenue in the
R-1 zone. '
Planning Associate Louis Morales stated applicant Gil Moya is
proposing a one story 1700 square foot residence, comprised of
three bedrooms, two baths with a two car garage. Also stated the
_ site-plari review committee had recommended approval at a previous
meeting. Proposal address is consistent with zoning
classifications, meets with variance performance. Community
Development staff has determined the project is categorically
exempt'pursuant to Section 15061b (3) of the State of California
Environmental Quality Act of 1989. Staff respectfully requests
approval. .
Lee Ortega 11669 Vieta Ave. spoke in opposition to the Variance:
Questioned lot width and fire hydrant located in front of
property. �
After further discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Pryor;
�
i
' . � . ' . , , . i .
' � � �
j ,
i
I
y.
I
.. .♦ . ' ' . ' �
�� seconded by Commi�ner Lee to approve: � ?.
f RESOLUTION NO. 2 ENTITLED: �'A RESOLUTI OF THE PLANNSNG
COMMI38ION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD.APPROVING A VARIANCE REQUEST
(CASE NO. 17) TO REDUCE THE LOT WIDTHS FROM THE REQUIRED 50 FEET.
TO 45.1 FEET ON THE WEST PROPERTY LINE� AND 20.71 FEET WITH A
22.23 FOOT RADIUS ON THE EAST PROPERTY LINE IN ORDER TO BUILD A
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING IN THE R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY�
RESIDENTIAL) ZONE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VIETA AND FERNWOOD
AVENUES'� LYNWOOD� CALIFORNIA��. ,
ROLL CALL �
AYES: COMMISSIONER DOVE� MUHSIN� PRYOR� LEE, DIXON
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONER HAYNES� MCMILLER
Director of Community Development Blumenfeld requested the next,
item on the agenda, Variance Case No. 18, Ray N. Contreras'
. Applicant, be continued. Stated staff has discovered that Mr.'
Contreras has supplied an incorrect property address on the�
application as well as on the project plan. Notice by mailing;
Yadius had covered the incorrect address.
It was moved by Commissioner Lee, seconded by Commissioner Pryor
' to continue the item to the next regular scheduled meeting of'
June 8, T993. ,
' ROLL CALL
' AYEB: COMMIS3IONER DOVE� MUHSIN� PRYOR� LEE, DIXON
NOES: NONE
, ABSENT: COMMIS3IONER HAYNES� MCMZLLER
Community Development Director Blumenfeld introduced the next,'
item on the agenda, Variance Case No. 19, Habitat for Humanity-
Applicant. Offered a brief background on the applicant, stating,
they are a privately funded, non-profit organization, that.
renovates housing for low income families. At this time, they
are requesting a variance in order to develop a single family'
dwelling at the northwest corner of Fernwood Avenue and Santa Fe'
Avenue. The proposed land use is consistent with the existingl'
zoning classification R-1 and the General Plan, although the�
property is relatively small and does not optimally accommodate
the proposed development. The lot is substandard in that it does',
not meet current development standards relative to lot area, lot;
width and required front and side yard. After consideration from'
the Commission, staff is requesting approval of variance.
Juan F. Aceytuno, Jr., Member-Board of Directors from Habitat for'
. Humanity and Principal Architect spoke in favor of item.
�
Commissioner Pryor questioned whether or not the setback is in
compliance with the rest of the house. ,
Director of Community Development Blumenfeld indicated that the;
projedt had reduced setback.' Also stated this project was'
introduced by PAL and was used as part of the Kickoff Plan.
�
�
,
� �
�� After further dis�sion, �
It was moved by Commissioner Lee, seconded by Commissioner Muhsin
to approve:
RESOLUTION NO. 2473 ENTITLED: "A RE30LUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A VARIANCE REQUEST
(CASE NOt 19) TO REDUCE THE LOT AREA FOR A CORNER LOT FROM 5�000
SQ. FT. TO 3�600 SQ. FT., THE REQUIRED LOT WIDTH FROM SO FEET TO
30 FEET� AND THE REQUIRED FRONT 3IDE YARD FROM 10 FEET TO 8 FEET
IN ORDER'TO DEVELOP A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF FERNWOOD AVENUE AND SANTA FE AVENUE� IN THE R-1 (SINGLE
' FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD� CALIFORNIA��.
ROLL CALL �
AYES: COMMISSIONER DOVE� MUHSIN� PRYOR� LEE� DIXON �
" NOES: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONER HAYNES� MCMILLER l
Community Development Director Blumenfeld stated the next items
on the agenda, Conditional Use Permit No. 127, Tentative Parcel
Map Case No. 28, General Plan Case No. 6 and Zone Change Case No.
' 5, Applicant Nathaniel Robenson, are all related cases.
Currently the applicant has not provided staff with the necessary '
' parcel map to process Tentative Parcel Map No. 28 for
consideration by the Commission. Additionally, staff has not
completed the mailing subject to the case. Therefore, 'staff is
requesting this item be continued to permit processing of these
approvals concurrentl.y, with receipt of all the necessary
application materials. �
It was moved by Councilmember pove, seconded by Commissioner Lee
to continue these item to the next regular scheduled meeting of
June 8, 1993.
ROLL CALL �
AYES: COMMISSIONER DOVE� MUHSIN� PRYOR� LEE� DIXON i
NOEB: NONE
AHSENT: COMMISSIONER HAYNES� MCMILLER
;
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING i
Community Development Director Blumenfeld stated the next item on
the agenrla, Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 125 is continued
from the previous Planning Meeting, to permit the applicant to
revise plans pursuant to the Planning Commission and
Community concerns. Applicant has gone forward and prepared
' revised drawings and made presentations both to staff and the
community. However, due to staff error, the project was,
incorrectly posted. therefore, staff Yequests that after,
consideration the Planning Commission continue this case pursuant
to the agenda until the June 8, 1993 meeting to complete noticing
requirements.to the project. Staff would also like to request
that the Commission receive and file the,attached staff report,;
and permit the applicants representative to make a brief
presentation on the proposed redesign revisions which will be
,
. i
,
�
;
�
helpful in the s�equent Planning Commiss� deliberations on'
(�� the project. '
Commissioner Lee stated for the record that this would be an
" informal presentation and not a Public Hearing.
�
Manuel Cuevas, architect for the project introduced himself to
the Commission. �
` Jose Vargas, architect for Mr. Kesslers project gave a brieE
presentation and report.
After further discussion by staff, it was decided to continue the
' item to the next regular scheduled meeting of June 8, 1993. ,
Chairperson Dixon introduced the next item on the agenda„
Conditional Use Permit Case No. 126, Tarcicio Yazquez, applicant.'
Community Development Director Blumenfeld stated Mr. Yazquez,�
applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to establish and
operate an automobile sales lot at 11605 Long Beach Boulevard in
the C-2A (Medium Commercial) zone. Staff requests that after"
consideration, the Planning Commission continue this case until�
the June 8, 1993 Planning Commission meeting pursuant to
applicants request. , :
Commissioner Lee questioned the number of continuances requested
by the applicant.
, Community Development Director Blumenfeld stated this is the
third continuance.
Tony Mora, 11605 Long Beach Blvd, spoke on behalf of Mr. Yazquez.�
Stated the applicant had not requested another continuance `
Tarcicio Yazquez stated he is the owner of the business. The
property owner however is not available at this time and Mr.:
Yazquez would like continued time in order to work with him. ,
After further discussion;
It was moved by Commissioner pove, seconded by Commissioner
Muhsin to continue this item to the next regular scheduled
meeting of June 8, 1993.
d-
ROLL CALL
AYEB: COMMISSIONER DOVE� MUHSIN� PRYOR� LEE� DZXON
NOES: NONE. .
ABSENT: COMMISSIONER HAYNES� MCMILLER •
REGULAR ORDER OF SIISINESS ' .
None
BTAFF COMMENTS �
Community Development Director Blumenfeld stated there were
� � ��
�
�.
�
�
{ >, several previou tems pertaining to p ious Commission�
� approvals that re�e some direction from t�ommission.
�
Planning Associate Louis Morales stated there .had been numerous
concerns over the numerous move ons that have been proposed.�
Applicant Nicholas Dukakis is proposing to move a structure to�
3172 Redwood Ave.
i
. After further discussion,
Community Development Director Blumenfeld stated staff would move;
ahead with the Commissions directive to prepare a draft Ordinance�
.
for discussion relative to move-ons. .
Nicholas Dukakis, 4001 Pacific Coast Awy., Suite 106, Torrance,;
spoke on his own behalf. Gave brief description of structure.
Also stated he is•willing to work with staff and the commission'' ,
towards improvements or changes.
�
Community Development Director stated staff will proceed with the
project pursuant to direction from the Commission. Also stated:
Mr. Dukakis had stated he wished to go through'with the project;
almost concurrent with a request from the Commission relative to��
move-ons.
,
- Planning Associate Louis Morales gave a description on Site Planl
Review 100, 101 and 102 for Wilbur Owens, applicant. These
proposals on�City owned lots originated from the PAL program.,
Currently the City is contemplating the development of single ;
family homes. Stated the Commission had indicated an interest in
projects be evaluated and approved by the PAL process. ,
Community Development Director Blumenfeld introduced the next
item, Conditional Use Permit No. 90 for Frontier Market, which�
was previously approved by the Commission. Staff at this time;
has prepared a letter and plaa for review relative to the�
land5caping, which needs to be resolved at this time. Applicant�
has constructed a perimeter planter of 4' 6" rather that the'
required 5'. Applicant has also eliminated the installation of�
parking lot interior planting in violation of approved plans,�
Therefore it would not be treated as an administrative matter.'
Staff requests that after consideration Planning Commission
provide direction on disposition of matter.
Recommendation from staff is:
"Project conditions be modified to centralize planters within the'
- applicants lot". ;
,
CUP NO. 122/TPM 125 ±
Pacific Medical Buildings, Applicant. Staff requests direction'
', from the Commission relative to.parking plan approval. �
A
, TRAN3IT STATION
Information will be.provided at the next meeting.
,
'
,
�
r ,
+ VACATION OF ALLEY SEMENT
`r� Staff is provi an informal item by�e Public works
'} Department to vaca e the alley at 4238. The Commission agreed
with the subject request.
FENCE HEIGHT
Request to amend the City's Auto Service and Auto Sales Ordinance
relative to fence height.
Staff was considering use of the City's new Auto Service/Sales
Ordinance in connection with the improvement of a use on Imperial
Highway, owned by a Mr. Eliu Saulcedo, however existing� fence
regulation would preclude the necessary screening for the site.
It was recommended by commission that staff direct the owner to
get a variance for the fence height for his property and that
staff prepare revisions to the City's Fence Ordinance for review
at the next Commission meeting.
COMMENTS
None
PUBLIC ORALS
None
COMMISSION ORALS
None
Haying no further discussion, meeting was adjourned at 10:20.
ELIZABETH DIXON, CHAIRPERSON
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
SOL BLUMENFELD, DIRECTOR OF KENNETH FONG, DEPUTY CITY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ATTORNEY
AGENDA -�� �0. � ;
� CASE N0. 31 '
�_ ;
DATE: June 8, 1993
� TO: PLANNING COMMISSION �
. ,
�FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director
Community Development Department ;
SUBJECT: Zoning Ordinance Amendment ZOA 31 ,
` Proposed Ordinance Establishing an Architectural Review, .
Board to Provide a Process For Review and Approval of
Al1 New Buildings or Structures (Other than a Single-
Family Residences) City-Wide -
,
Purbose• �
To establish a process for the review and approval of exterior
and/or site design of any new building or structure (other than a-0
' single-family residence), exterior remodeling projects (other than;
maintenance and repair work), and commercial signs located withinl
the City of Lynwood. �'
,
Background•
The City Council has expressed concern relative to the design
review and design standards for all projects in.the City of Lynwood'
and directed staff to establish an Architectural Review Board. "
Facts• �
1. The design of new commercial and industrial development does
not fulfill the intent of the Community Design Element of the.
General Plan.
1
2. The Architectural Review Board will review development ;
plans for approval in construction, relocation, alteration,
rehabilitation or expansion of buildings or structures (other ;
than in projects requiring minor interior remodeling, '
" plumbing, electrical and internal structural changes}. _
3. The proposed Architectural Review Board will review exterior�
remodeling, site design and sign applications thereby i
contributing to the quality of design in the City. .
Issues and Analvsis:
The proposed Architectural Review Board will supplement the City
Site Plan Review process. With the exception of restorations, ,
rehabilitation and additions to existing single-family residences, �
the Board will review and approve all new construction, `
restorations, rehabilitations, additions, signs and landscaping, to
all structures prior to issuance of a building permits. The Board
will have authority to review and make recommendations to approve ",
or deny all commercial and industrial development plans.
Recommendation: ` �
Staff respectfully request that after consideration, the Planning ,
Commission approval the attached resolution No.2474: �
,
A: Certifying that the Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 31 is �
categorically exempt from the provision of the state . CEQA j
Guidelines as amended by Section 15061b(3). ' +
B. Recommend that the City Council approve the findings in �
Resolution No. 2474 waive the reading and introduce the proposed ;'
ordinance,
Attachment:
(1) Resolution No. 2474 '
( 2 ) Ordinance �
- n:\wpfiles\planning\zoa3lpl '
�
1
� �
' RESOLUTION NO. 2474
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE :
CITY'OF LYNWOOD RECOMMENDING THE CITY ADOPTION
OF AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 25 OF THE LYNWOOD
MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO ESTABLISHING AN ,
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD.
�
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that
this Amendment is categorically exempt from the provisions of State;
CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061(b)3; and �
�
WAEREAS, the Planninq Commission of the City o£ Lynwood�
considered all gertinent testimony offered at the public hearing;,
' Section 1. The Plann3ng Commission hereby finds and;
determines as follows:
A. The proposed amendment will be consistent with thei
ob�ectives and development policies of the City of Lynwood.
B. The proposed amendment will not unreasonably constrain the!
use of property by landowners and developers.
C. The proposed amendment will establish a supplementary, _
process for design review in the City.
. ;
D. The proposed Architectural Review Board will review the
', design of new structures and exterior remodeling and sign
applications thereby contributing to the quality of design in the
: City. � �
E. The design of new commercial and industrial development'
currently does not fulfill the intent of the Community Design'
Element of the General Plan. '
` Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based�
upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby adopts'
the proposed Amendment.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of JUNE 1993; by the members,
of the City Planning Commission voting as follows: �
i
AYES:
i
NOES: �
ABSENT: +
ABSTAIN:
ELIZABETH DIXON,
CHAIRPERSON •
' APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sol Blumenfeld, Director Kenneth Fong �
Community Development Department City Attorney '.
reso•2474 � � � �
� � � �
� ORDINANCE NO. � ;
- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF �
THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AMENDING •
CHAPTER 25-35 OF THE LYNWOOD
' MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO
ESTABLISHING AN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW ,
' BOARD TO PROVIDE A PROCESS FOR ;
REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF ALL NEW
,
BUILDING OR STRUCTURE (OTHER THAN A
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE) CITY-WIDE
' Section 1. Chapter 25-35 of the Lynwood Municipal Code is
hereby amended for the purpose of this section to provide a',
process for review and approval of exterior and/or site design of�
any new building or structure (other than a single-family',
residence), exterior remodeling projects (other than maintenance'
and repair work), and commercial signage located within the- City�
of Lynwood Redevelopment Project Areas.
A. Jurisdiction. j
No building permit shall' be issued for the following unless
plans, elevations and/or other graphic representations of
the said development have been reviewed and recommended for
approval by Architectural Review Board. '
1. The construction of any new building or structure',
(other than a single-family residence). '
. 2. 'Exterior remodeling (other than maintenance and repair;
'
work) .
�
3. Siqns.
B. The Architectural Review Board.
i
1. Composition. The Architectural Review Board is hereby�
established which shall consist of five (5). members.�
The members shall be appointed by the City Council. At
` least two members shall be from among the followingi
disciplines: arChitecture, building construction,;
landscape architecture, planning, landscaping and
visual or graphic design. one (1) member shall have a
business or be a managerial employee of a business�
within the Area City. ,
. � �.
2. ,�Quorum. The presence of three (3) members shall�
constitute a quorum. • ;
3. Terms: The initial members of the Architectural Review;
Board shall be appointed to terms so as to stagger the
term of the appointees so that one term becomes vacant.
on each successive year. The term of each member�
appointed to a full term shall be three (3) years.
4. Authority and Duties. The Architectural Review Board�
shall review plans, elevations, and/or other geographic'
representations for development which is under the;
, jurisdiction of the Board, to assure compliance with:,
the criteria set forth in the Municipal Code, General'
, Plan and Redevelopment Plan. '
5. Procedure. All applications for design review approvali
shall be submitted to the Architectural Review Board
for its review. The Board shall submit its+ '
recommendation in writing, to the Director of Community;
f:\ordnance\zoa3lcc , .
�
1
Develo t with a copy mailed to applicant, within
10 w�ng days following�ceipt of said ^
applic ion(s), or within such a ditional time as is
mutually agreed upon in writing by the applicant and
the Board. The Board's Review shall consider'
compliance with the following criteria: �
(a) Whether all proposed structures, remodeling and
signs conform to all of the provisions contained
within the'City's Sign Ordinance, General Plan and
Redevelopment Plan.
;
(b) Whether the design motif of all proposed buildings,
` or structures has been applied with equal rigor on
' all externally visible elevations.
(c) Whether color and types of building materials are
� reasonable consistent with the nature o£
structures in the ares.
(d) Whether all proposed buildings are designed, to
the extent feasible, so as not to cast'
objectionable shadows.on adjacent properties.
(e) Whether all open areas not utilized for building,
driveways, parking areas, recreational facilities
. or walks are landscaped so that multiple family or,.
commercial uses are reasonable buffered from the
view of single-family residences.
-. The Community Development Department, within ten '
working days following receipt of the recommendation of;.
the Architectural.Review Board, shall approve,;
disapprove, or modify said recommendation and shall�
forward a copy of the determination to the applicant,;
Architectural Review Board, Building Division, City,
Planning Commission and City Council. '
6. Appeals. Any applicant, member of City Council, Mayor
any interested person adversely affected by a�
determination of the Architectural Review Board and�
the Director of Community Development may appeal the'
determination or action or the Architectural Review,
Board to.the City Planning Commission and may,
thereafter appeal the action of the City Planning�
Commission to the City Council. i �
Such appeals must be made within 15 days after the,
-, postmarked date of the determination or the�
- Commission's determination if appealed to the City
' Council, in the manner prescribed for in Section
of the Municipal Code. �
� i
r
- Fees for filing an appeal from the Director's .
determination by the applicant shall be the same as?
those for approval of an application required for a
Commission Plan approval, as established in Section�
of the Municipal Code.
Section 2. Severabilitv. if any section, subsection,
subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this;
ordinance or the application thereof to any person or place, is� ,
for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court or competent jurisdiction, such decision�
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions, of this;
ordinance or its application to other person or places. The Ci�y,
Council hereby declares that it would have adopted thi5
ordinance, and each section thereof, irrespective of the fact;
that any one or more section, subsection, sentence, or place, be, '
declared invalid or unconstitutional. '
� � f:\ordnance\zoa3lcc � ` - � �
2 i
r` Section 3. �e City Clerk is hereby�ered and directed•
to certify to the passage of this ordinance and to cause the same
to be published once in the Lynwood Press, a newspaper of general
circulation printed, published, and circulated in the City of.
Lynwood. ,
First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said',
. City held on the day of , 1993 and finally,'
ordered published at a regular meeting of said Council held on
the day of , 1993.
�
y
Paul A. Richards II, Mayor
City of Lynwood, California ,
;
a ATTEST: �
Andrea L. Aooper, City Clerk �
City of Lynwood �
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: �
t
Henry Barbosa So1 Blumenfeld, Director
General•Council Community Development Department
, ,
� , .
• � f:\ordnance\ioa3lcc - � �
�
4
�
{
�
_ a
3
.
,� `-� � - ' �� � AGENDA IT6� N�: � �
'.
rJ DATE: June 8, 1993 ��SC NO. _ ,�
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION " .�'��;�
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director � ,
Community Development Department ,
SUBJECT: Variance Case No. 18 ,
Applicant: Ray N. Contreras
�
;
Proposal• ,
The applicant is requesting a Variance to reduce the required-
lot widths from 50 feet to 35.36 feet with a 20.64 foot radius
along the north property line, and 47.22 feet along the south
property line in order to develop a single family dwelling on a
parcel at 4050 Louise Avenue in the R-1 (Single Family
Residential) zone, Lynwood, California.
Facts
1. Source of Authoritv.
Section 25-26 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that a;
variance be obtained from the Planning Commission because of
special circumstances applicable to the property, and when
,. strict application of the Zoning Ordinance deprives such
property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the
vicinity and under identical zoning classification.
2. Propertv Location and Size
The site is located between Fernwood Avenue and Josephine�
Avenue, at the southwest corner of Louise Avenue. The parcel.
is odd shaped, approximately 5,702.64 square feet in size.'
. (Please see the attached location map) '
3. Existing Land Use
The site is vacant and is surrounded by the following land;
uses:
North - I-105 Century Freeway
South - Residential
East - Residential �
West - Vacant/Residential
. 4. Land Use Description '
General Plan Zoning '
North - Single Family Residential R-1
South - Transportation/Townhouse R-2
and Cluster Housing
East - Single Family Residential R-1
West - Single Family Residential R-1
. �
' t
� f:\staffrpt\var18 - � .
. 1
i
� � � ;
�,1'
5. Proiect Characteristics
The property is currently vacant and fronts Louise Avenue at�
Muriel Drive. The applicant proposes to develop a two (2)
story, 2,108 square foot, single family residence consisting
of four (4) bedrooms, a study, three (3) bathrooms, living
room/dining room, kitchen and nook, and an attached two (2).
car garage. The development is proposed for a site with a'
lot widths less then the required fifty (50') feet, and,'
therefore, substandard in size. This substandard condition
was created by the realignment of Louise street at Muriel
Drive Avenue'in order to accommodate the development of the
I-105 (Century) Freeway. All landscape requirements will be�
met by the proposed project.
6. Site Plan Review
At its regular meeting of April 29, 1993, the Site Plan
Review Committee reviewed and recommended approval of the,
Variance request.
7. Zoning Enforcement Historv
None of record.
8. Neiahborhood Response
None of record at the time of preparation of the staff
report.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
1. Consistencv with General Plan
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning
classification R-1 and the General Plan designation of Single
Family Residential.
2. Site SUitabilitv
The property'is adequate in size to accommodate the proposed
development. However, the lot is substandard in that it does'
not does meet current development standards relative to lot
width. In addition the site configuration does not allow
compliance with those requirements. Therefore, a Variance is
required for the project.
3. Compatibility ,
The proposed single-family residential use is compatible with
other uses on neighboring properties.
f:\pLanning\staffrp[\f:varl8 ,
2
� ,
� � �
,
4. Compliance with Develobment Standards �
Findings: '
The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the;
specific regulation would not resu7t in practical difficultyp
or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the
objectives of the City Zoning Ordinanae. �
That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or,
• conditions applicable to the property involved which do not:
apply generally to other properties in the same zone.
That 'granting of the Variance as conditioned will not
constitute the granting of a special privilege inconsistent;
with the limitations on other properties in the same zone.
That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to.
the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially-
injurious to properties or imp�ovements in the vicinity.
That the granting of the Variance will not adversely affect,
the orderly development of the City.
' Staff recommends approval of the subject project Variance for.
the reduction of lot widths. "
5. Environmental Assessment
The Community Development Director has determined that the
project is categorically exempt pursuant to State CEQA•
Guidelines as amended by Section 15061b (3).
,
RECOMMENDATION
, Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the '
Planning Commission approval of the Variance request:.
A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from
the provision of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by'.
Section 15061b(3). �
, B. Approving Variance Application Permit No. 18, subject to
' the stated conditions and requirements. '
C. Finding that strict or literal interpretation and�
enforcement of the specific requlation would deprive the.
applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other�
properties in the same zone.
Attachments �
1. Location Map
2. Resolution No. 2466
3. Site Plan ,
�
� �f:\staffrpt\vari8 . -
, . ' . - . -. �.
g
,
i
��/ � - . , . . . _
�� LOCATION iVIAP � �� �� � �
� .� ,
. .e.r su. nxe .
.. � K,[� - � � � ss114�'� � a� � !� •a �
� � �A �S /O � IJ f �
"' ;� � ' J y � •�� �o !t � . ' - "
� �''fR,yM,G00 � " rl � � J . 33 �LJ Q ,
.,�%SSw =, • .3/ h
' � 4// Q isi/G p
��ECTR � ° ti �
� � . , p , r,,,.�� WY ' .wc° tl S � `E:r .�oo :-,
i sa
�' G �a . . � ;
.. � �. � � ..1t � �
,�� ,� s
r � ��` � 4 p��eR J a Tq
, tor �'�e w 70 ;
' � � '. �
. 4� o�e • . . . � � e
� ! 4 � �� p � � 2�, �\ \ � � �
GOl//Sf * a a ,
r $ '
+
. � °4 P �• � � �� � e� � � o M o- ' �
' �n" xa i� ao ai az � �e � � . .� �o ,u �o .�Q W �
d a
. . . 3 � � � � � '� � � � .
, Q 6�
�M6 M I/a a � �� 7 Q
<SS
_ o � o I �� '��JS 2 y w' '
$ ✓OSEPH/N[ � i i��i . �
. • � � � '?& u � .
`b, �
. � 11! 170 16� KO 1R If6 '� .f j.�
a , sa °
f ��
�
• ��� lu �t6 ir � bi at 2 � '..
� oa � 3�s 6 �A
� �" ;
e �,d,,..,. _ * i
r ,
I
� � .. . , , � - � � � . :
i
CASE N0. :
'
. � �
h
.. /���.2 � . ,
� ibC.C�� - 6.G11i.liG G.v��.�!✓.vK FENcC' i"� � �
9•'l 2 '�'.�" Y �,�� 6, o
�. .. P.�uIL�IfJ[� DIM.. SID ,
_ . ' ' YD. . .. '• . n i50�
� F1�l.Gi� i _
�.• f- $:EJUS�
- � ' , ., �� ' ; _.
E-- � . � ' 0
¢!, z , 0 <
. � � 'J. ; �� }
, _6L1 ,bo� - EC.100�60 <
� � F4µ'. Ciit• . Ell`I�GR';` Y
. + � �
� - � �— ..
g � ��ruaa �o•�r��x..'
0 � I�� �;, . �,. ���; �
' ' . t � i�rr N1 ! i � '� i (� �
J � I� I11 �3!T' it �'� � 12 .. a
LEC,AL. W ��+ w!; b�pv=� '�I . �
PP�RCEL NOr 063850 .OI � }' N I�"�`:� ! ` . '
T AC �f NO,. 105 03 a� Q �� W g 1 � STQ DEW�1,L11� °� .
�o-c �o. 3cn Q I� ! FINiFLR lAl•5o'1 l a
� � �� 'P';ICAMPQp. �NC�La,; IN .
�, 3: 0 0�,.1.�►Y ' is• Fe�: � s.��oi.00� ; S
�oT AREA: rj702.fo4Sg.Fj � tr+ LL.CLASS �
Q .� '�+ `.;..,.,GALV.�� L � r;' � . FIN.QR�: _Q. .
LOT. ZOT�IE'. ra-1 a_�n. �;>':. �� f? �t;k �., .; , -� u
-- -,-_ , z
� . - E � , � �a. �� .�.:�L � 1 I ' ' 0
J, �,. r�:,, ----� � _ �
F1 KiR.� � _ ,
I — -- � �
.. (2�GUa CE� �
; � (. L �d�:1 1 ii.'12� �
_ _ _ . — —. ��'O° W.I �� _ _. . —'�' SL�_�
.. ' . I CDNG. W LI� . — . , , � �` . Y
� I � tx�s� . 100•S� ' �
� �' � n`E ,h i �' • � EL- - d
i ELQ-" .5 � 3'/?'co►�. u. E7�$.FtN:
� �R�vEWAY � \. �
' . � ST. l N i �J °Q Y►
a� Q �' �
°� 11 ,, $,i p.10° � EL. 100.�� � N = Q
' •,� l . � •• � • ' gR'CG� � E
��� '' ' 3S, g�, � Y � F-tt � .
. ...� \�.��` o-�: '
_��._: • NEw DRIVEWAY
`� Cu1lb � APRON
+_ S1� T'C7
.�Q� QODR�SS ��TY OF;CYNWOOI
� . � DEPf. OF �PUBLIC `r1�
i .QoSo LOUISE STREET ; �
GIT7 OF LYNWOOD ,CA, � �
� MR� MFt� '-�F=1ct-iAI RUNCRAhIC',ISI � .
._ 744� GERRITOg AVE '
STAtJT�I�I CA. �iO�C$O - r
6USit�1 ESS � �14 - 828- 21 I( 1`tORTi-z
f-+oME PH�N�. 3�o-q25-5873 ��� I ��� " ' {,
• � �A�e :'2 -?7- 9:
�
' ,
{
i
:j • RESOLUTION NO. 2466 � �
T
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A '
, VARIANCE REQUEST (CASE NO. 18) TO REDUCE
THE LOT WIDTHS FOR A CORNER LOT FROM 50
FEET TO 35.36 FEET WITH A 20.64 FOOT
� RADIUS ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE, AND
47.22 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE '.
AT 4050 LOUISE AVENUE, IN ORDER TO ,
DEVELOP A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AT 4043 ,
' LOUZSE AVENUE, IN THE R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA.,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission o£ the City of Lynwood, :
'pursuant to law, held a public heasing on the subject'
application; and
WHEREAS, the Planriing Commission has carefully considered
all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and ,
WHEREAS, the project is consistent with the intent of the
General Plan in that the subject site is classified R-1 (Single,
Family Resident"ial).
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined:
that the proposal is exempt from provisions of the State CEQA;
Guidelines, Section 15061b (3), as amended.
Sedtion 1. The Planning Commission of the City of .
Lynwood hereby finds and determines as follows: '
A. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement '
of the specific regulation would result in practical difficulty �
• or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with thes
objectives of the City Zoning Ordinance.
B. That there are exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions.applicable to the property involved
which do apply generally to other properties in the same;
.
zone.
C. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement �
" of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of
privileges enjoyed by the owners of otlier properties in the same ;
zone. ,
D. That the granting of the Variance as conditioned will
� not constitute the grariting of.a special privilege inconsistent
with the limitations on other properties in the same zone. ;
E. That the granting of the Variance will not be •
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or "
, materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
. vicinity.
' F. That the granting of the Variance will not adversely '
affect the orderly development of the City. �
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of '
Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and the'
determinations, hereby approves Variance Case No. 18, subject to '
the following conditions:
� f�:\resolutn\reso2466 � • '
1
. ,°
� • •
S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable
regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform
Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code.
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or
structures thereon, shall be first reported to Director of �
the Community Development for review and approval.
3. �The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments.
4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a
Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read,
understands, and agrees to all conditions of this approval
prior to issuance of any building permits.
PLANNING DIVISION
5. The applicant shall contact the U.S.. Post Office (Lynwood
main office) to establish the location of a mail box '
serving the proposed development.
6. Landscaping areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25�)
percent of the lot area.
7. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance
with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the
Director of Community Development prior to issuance of any
buildina permits.
8. The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs
combined with ground cover as follows: One (1) five (5)
gallon shrub for each 100 square feet of landscape area; and
two (2) fifteen (15) gallon trees for each 500 square feet
of landscaped area. .
9. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be
landscaped pursuant to Condition No. 8 except for necessary
walks, drives and fences. .
10. No side yard shall be less then five (5') feet.
11. Acoustical construction materials must be used throughout
the unit to mitigate freeway noise to the standards and
satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division.
12. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer
shall pay $1.65 per square foot for residential buildings �
to the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to
Government Code Section 53080.
13. A minimum two (2) car garage shall be provided for the
proposed development.
14. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved.
15. Construction shall commence within six (6) months from date
of issuance of building permits. .
f:\resolutn\reso2466
2
,
�t 16. Prior to the�nstallation or construct�n of any masonry�,
'' wall, the property owner shall obtain a permit for and,
submit the following information to the Planning Division:
a. Simple plot plan showing the location of the masonry
wall in relation to property lines, lengths, proposed'
materials, and openings or gates to provide access for,
vehicles and pedestrians.
b. For masonry walls (as defined in subsection 25-
' 2.1) a building permit shall be applied for in addition
to the plot plan described above. All masonry walls of'
any height shall meet the requirements for masonry�
construction as defined in Chapter 24 of the Unified'
Building code. A fee based on the valuation of the
proposed constructioa shall be paid to the Building;
Department.
,
c. All masonry walls `shall be required to maintain
adequate pedestrian access for the purpose of safety'
and convenience. A thirty-six (36) inch or three (3)
foot clear gate or opening shall be provided to all
enclosures for pedestrian and wheelchair access.
Pedestrian and vehicular access shall be provided
separately. '
d. All masonry walls be required to be installed with a�
finished, aesthetically pleasing side facing out toward"
adjacent properties or the public right-of-way.
DESIGN ;
17. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective,
material of either concrete tile or clay tile.
18. The residential structure shall have an exterior siding of
brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar_
material other than the reflective, glossy, polished and/orl
roof-formed type metal siding.
' 19. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the
street dedications.
2D. All security fences, qrills, etc. shall be architecturally
� compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent'
buildings. In addition, no security fences, grills etc.
shall be installed without the prior written approval of
the Director of Community Development.
21. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment,
swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical
devices shall be located within the rear yard or street
side yard or corner lot. Such equipment shall be screened
from surrounding properties and streets and operated in
' accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance.
22. The owner of the site shall maintain a pro-active approach
to the elimination of graffiti from the structures, fences�
and any accessory building, on a daily basis.
23. A cover sheet of approved Conditions must be attached to
plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety.
Division.
� f:�resolutn�reso2466 �� . �
3
,
1� � � �
f 24. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in
sanitary condition pendinq construction and shall be •,
maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times..
Failure to comply may result in revocation of the approved �
Variance.
25. For the purpose of providing heating for any dwelling ;.
proposed, only an energy efficient forced air furnace shall '
be used, and that the use of any wall furnace shall be
' expressly prohibited. .
PUBLIC WORK/ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
26. Submit a qrading plan prepared and signed by a registered
Civil Engineer. Grading plan will be checked by Public
Works Department. No building permits will be issued prior
' to the approval of grading plan by City Engineer. Property '
is located within 100 year Flood Level Zone per flood
boundary map. The owner has to build the foundation pad 1�
foot above flood level.
27. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter, drive
approach(es) and required pavement along Muriel Avenue and
Louise Street.
28. Construct a new drive approach per City standards at Louise '
Street,
29. Close existinq drive approach per City standards along '
Muriel Avenue.
30. Construct one (1) wheelchair ramp at southwest corner of
Louise Street and Muriel Avenue.
31. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected �
separately. Construct laterals as necessary.
.32. Root prune two (2) existing street trees and install root ;
barriers at Muriel Avenue. �
33. Install two (2) 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood ;
standards along Louise Street.
34. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass.
35. Provide and install one (1) marbelite street pole with ,
light fixture, underground services and conduits along .
Louise Street.
, ,
36. Underground all utilities. . ,
37. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all
off-site improvements.
38. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or �
fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer. :
The work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired'�
by the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from
the Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing
any work.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
"No Comments"
, f:\resolutn\reso2466 . . � � ,
4 '
r ,
�, • • �
, Section 3. A copy of tliis resolution shall be delivered to,
- � the applicant. �
APPROVED and ADOPTED day of ,
1993, by members of the Planninq Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
i .
` NOES: .
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Elizabeth Dixon, Chairperson ,
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: �
Sol Blumenfeld, Director Kenneth Fong
Community Development Director City Attorney �
�.
i
.
. • .
;
. � f:\resoluiMreso2466 , .
5 , ;
`i��� � � � � P,GENDA I�M N(�. ;
� ���: � �
. GASE NO6 �'-U P � ZS
DATE: June 8, I993
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director
Community Development Department '
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 125
Applicant: Rick Kesseler
PROPOSAL:
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit
to develop a sixteen (16) unit townhouse development at 4291
Carlin Avenue in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. This item
was continued from the January 12, 1993 Planning Commission
meeting.
- FACTS•
1. Source of Authority
Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that
a Conditional Use Permit be obtained for any residential
development in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. '
2. ProPertv Location:
The site is located on the North side of Carlin Avenue,
between Atlantic Avenue and Waldorf Drive. (Refer to the
attached location map)
3. Propertv size•
,.
' The site consists of a rectangular shaped lot, approximately
41,511 square feet (101' x 411') in size. i
4: Existing Land Use: �
The property is currently a vacant lot. The surrounding
land uses are as follows:
�
North - Single-Family Residential
South - Mixture of Residential '
East - Trailer Park
' West - Vacant Care Facility ,
5. Land Use Desianation:
j
The Gener.al Plan Designation for the subject property is
Townhouse & Cluster Housing while the Zoning Classification
is R-2. The surrounding land use designations are as
follows; ,
General Plan Zoning }
North - Single-Family Residential North - R-1
� South - Townhouse & Cluster Housing South - R-2 •
East - Townhouse & Cluster Housing East -'R-2
West - Townhouse & Cluster Housing West - R-2
� � f:\staffrpt\cup125-3 . �� , ��'
i
�
, 1 j
r
�, � � - . . ! � � �
�
' 6. Proiect Chara�eristics .
z;
�,, �
The applicant proposes.to develop sixteen (16) units in a
cluster of four (4) structures maintaining consistency witki
the General Plan designation of Townhouse and Cluster
Housing. The development will consist of two floor plans,�
a three-bedroom.unit (unit A) and a two-bedroom unit (unit
B). There will be twelve (12) "A" units and four (4) "B"
units. The units will be combination split level and two�
story. Unit A will be approximately 1,300 sq. ft. with a
private balcony. Unit B will be approximately 806 sq. ft.' �
Each unit will have an attached two-car garage and the
development will provide four (4) guest parking spaces.
The development provides public open space at the rear.of
the site of approximately 3,500 sq. ft. which will contain
' such amenities as benches, barbecue equipment, and play
equipment.
i
The proposed townhouse development will be targeted for�
individual sale and ownership. Furthermore, the applicant is
requesting a 25� density bonus that would enable the
development of sixteen (16) units. The maximum number of
units allowed on the site without the density bonus would be
thirteen (13) units and although 13 unSts would be the
maximum, the site is able to accommodate 16 while still'
meeting the development standards as required by the Zoning
Code, In order to mitiqate proposed increased density, Staff
, recommended increased landscaping requirements including the
use of 24" box trees throughout the project. The current
site design provides 27 percent landscaping.
9
Approval of the density bonus would require that 25� of the�
units be targeted for sale to low to moderate income
households. Three (3) units will be low income and one (1).
will be moderate income housing, pursuant to State Housing
Guidelines. The density bonus provides an opportunity for
the City to meet the Regional Housing Needs Assessment
requirements (RHNA) mandated by the State of California
Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), and'
the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). �
(Please see attached Affordability Index)
�
The Planning Commission at the January 12, 1992, meeting,;
made comments and recommendations relative to the design of
the project and continued the item so that the applicant,
would be able to address the concerns raised by the Planning
Commission at said meeting. The Commission directed the
applicant to work with Staff in revising the project design.';
_ Initially the developer was reluctant to revise the project
pursuant to Commission's direction. The project was
redesigned to address the issues raised by the Planning
Commission relative to the screening of the parking area,'
landscaping, adequate rear setback, and tkie installation of"
decorative paving particularly at the pedestrian walkways. l
Since the January Planning Commission meeting, the Project�
has gone through two design iterations, one meeting with
, staff and the second meeting with a homeowners group on
Niland Street. The homeowners group expressed concern over,
the size and the amount of units being proposed. The home;
owners sought to redesign the project with fewer units and
increased amenities. (The homeowners group comments are
attached.) The developer has chosen however, to proceed witki
his revised plan that was presented to staff. .
7. Site Plan Review:
�
On Decembez 23, 1992, the Site P.lan Review Committee� ,
• evaluated the proposed development ana established
conditions for the proposal and deemed it appropriate for
the site. �
,
� f:\staffrpt\cup125-3 � ,� . � . �� ,-
;
� j
''
, 8. Zoninq Enforc�ent Historv: • 1
(i
On November 11, 1992, The Code Enforcement Division sent the
applicant a notice in reference to the excessive debris and
overgrown vegetation on the site.
` On November 30, 1992, Code Enforcement sent the applicant a,
letter of n'on-compliance reqarding the above as the
' applicant did not respond to the November lith letter. ;
The applicant corrected and complied with Code Enforcement
by the Site Plan Review meeting of December 23, 1992.
9. Public Resbonse:
,
At the Planning Commission meeting of January 12, 1993, Dr.�
Charles Floyd spoke in opposition to the project stating
- that approval of the project would interfere with the ballot
initiative for a card club that has since been certified by
the City Clerk. The City Attorney has determined that such a
ballot measure does not effect nor impact the decision
rendered by the Planning Commission. Block Watch Co=,
Captain, Henry Sims also spoke in opposition to the project.:
On June 3, 1993, Staff inet again with Mr. Sims who indicated '
a desire to eliminate the "B" units at rear and relocate the
recreation area more toward lot frontage which would'
increase the amount of project open space. In reviewing the
elevation at the rear of the property, it was noted that the
adjoining properties are three (3) feet higher than tlie
proposed finished elevation of the subject site and that the
proposed recreation area will be two (2) feet higher than
the finished elevation of the project which is almost
contiguous with the finished elevation of Mr. Sims';
, property. Thus, per Mr. Sims, in order to provide
additional visual screening, the proposed project rear
separation wall should be over-in-height. (Aproximately 12',
high)
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
1. Consistency with General Plan �
�
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning
classification (R-2), and the General Plan designation, Town
`. House and Cluster Housing. Therefore, granting Conditional
Use Permit No. 125, will not adversely affect the General
Plan. However, the project design previously was not in
_ conformance with the Community Design Element of the
General Plan relative to the following: -.
a. Parking and surface areas should facilitate thej
convenient and safe maneuvering of vehicles and parking
areas shall be screened by earthmounding, landscaping,'
and/or low decorative walls. ,
b. Structures shall be adequately setback from the rear�
yard to avoid land use impacts. ,
c. Decorative paving, such as stamped and colored concrete,'
should be installed, particularly for pedestrian paths in
parking areas to provide visual relief areas of asphalt.
since the January meeting the project has been redesigned'
to address the above requirement of the Design Element of
the General Plan.
2. Site Suitabilitv
,
The subject property is adequate in size and shape to;
, accommodate the proposed development with the appropriate
� f:\staffrpt\cup725-3 � � � �
,
3 �
.
;.,1 design relat• e to the proposed dens3ty; bulk of the
structures; parking; walls, fences; driveways, and other
development features required by the Zoning Ordinance.'
Furthermore, the subject property is adequately served with
the required public utilities and has the potential based on
the design, to offer adequate vehicular and pedestrian
accessibility.
3. Compliance with Development Standards
The proposed development meets the development standards!
required by the Zoning Ordinance regarding off-street
parking; front, and rear yard setbacks; lot coverage,
height, unit size; and 25� density bonus. '
a
4.. Compatibility �
The proposed project will be located in a neighborhood that�
has substantially transitioned from single-family to two=
family residences. Located to the north are single-family
residential uses. Properties located to the south, east,;
and west are developed as� single-family/multi-family �
residential respectively.
5. Public Hearin4
, On January 12, 1993, The Planning Commission heard testimony,
on C.U.P. No. 125 and moved to continue the item to allow
the applicant the opportunity to redesign the project to,
create better building articulation, open space, and visitor
parking.
6. Conditions of Approval
The improvements proposed, subject to the conditions
. recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have'
a negative effect on the values of the surrounding
properties, with the incorporation of Planning Commission
concerns, or interfere with or endanger the public health,
safety or welfare. " �
7. Benefits to Communitv '
� Development of the site has the potential to enhance the
neighborhood and act as a catalyst to foster other quality;'
. developments if the design is refined per Planning
Commission direction. Furthermore, the development may add
to the City's housing stock in conformance with the policies ,
of the Housing Element of the General Plaa.
,
8. Environmental Assessment
The Community Development Department Staff has determined'
that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section;
15061 B,(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by
Section 15061 b(3).
i
.� � �� � f:�staffrpt\cup125-3� � , �
4
�
� �
RECOMMENDATION: • •
, �•
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the�
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2461.
1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the'
2provision of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section
, 15061 b (3) f
� 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 125 subject to
the stated conditions and requirements.
�
ATTACHMENTS ' �
1. Location Map
° 2. Affordability Index
3. Home Owners Comments
- 4. Resolution No. 2461
,
i
; .
f:staffrpt:cup125-3 � � '
i
j
�
f
j '
,
�
. . ;
�
i .
i
, g
/
� ' - --
�� ._ - �......_._._. �- _. �
, ...---- ...... _._. . .. . .... ..._....... .
� -`• . r . ..,.
LOCATION iVIAP
:-� �� -_-=�__ � �.��iL-3� � �e� . —•• .., � ; �..-; �
� ,..� . • t � _ �... . .. � a �" ,
__75_" 7I : � '77 io � -St"' �!""" iYt11"' t1 • �2 ,,,
•y . f ���� <�� � e! � r.. ^ . w�uii. � .ir��,� �a�rTl.'♦ 7,. an
� �a�viNi4 - avENUE .
\.a � ni I �i�. ' �i. u� � ��• s• �� s. ae Ne °�� isr uiu i . �
le �i �� ..I I T S � � ]� ?7 � � � �� � I { ' u.
�I: 1• � •����r� - 7 � � , ` I ..
ai 3i � � � �.� i�o t9 7A � • � � a s
� � � y� id..i ~ , .X 76 �: 7�'�i � �!u_V_r7y'-1'�--
���.. � i . y . k z i
i�
�• � I t� i � . . � , .
ri�. •'ii..� h� V �� � f1 /I 4 M �i,• v � v�__���_1L'JT_�___
lV_____.
i i A
., W ! ,; i i i /7 _/ /D: I0,7/,71. lI W
� Q �� i i-'�iw � : � > �r� N � � 'i.
r� J , . •�^ � _ �"----°1-----
H �,� ' � %���� , � NILAND ..�S�f. s ' .• 'r-----+u-_ _-
, .
� N , t �a II . j/J �J � � 1� t� �v ��� ir
c � � 1 � / : , t � : o: t S � '_J� "'_'t"_'_'ttJ__'_' ..
� ,,,,, ns is •w i� } n � �io • a ' e 's i P� ;+� --- "�-----
� r � � . ', rn .
� . A VADA a ST. � �� • • �� ° � ' 2 � .
„ � . i , i
• ry ' � i �,� �9 I
s � 4:4
� i� tr r� ,��• � I i� f i 'i �
,r 4� il I � � I i' �
� ,
,a, .. � ..�.. .7l � I I I , " --- I^ - � u i---.
i ro � ia � � I � � � � .; -- .r•: --?- Kee
� ,,.., o ,�,. ?� J � dL--- ---� '
� � .. �
il � y � e J �L� � � �
� ,.o� �.. �'I i �v ! I � ��1 _; ^; !'M.i�T'7o�
I ' I
� Z � � � IH�� � I ��j J I : I L_ssI./!
'JN . LO'f 2 �I � � t��t'I • I I �� � i � j�
7 , � c 7 � I I !{-..+ '!� � � r
, = y p. � � � 1 •� 1: � . I �
� . i I i , �
� �R��►� { 1 -- •- AVENUE
n ai aRtr� sc j � w. . � r . i � • ,�' „ . , .
�
3 7 � � i 7 •� �.' "- �. / t 7
� j•; • i J 1 � u {! ? Z _� L � Z {
Z � �,��
Y. " — > Q : =t ,►r Q s .« 9
.t�w 6 -Y� r"jY'�' ! ^ fj .
o s' �,.�. � i � �t . _ �-te_�
S i wr� ;
,i�n � +.
��p• 6 ww 2 6 a. �� ds o ,,,
t'
` � ,a.q ' �. . at � .wr a �
W ��a�� I
� � o.i.� :... � � . C� �'_i�7 -- � i
a�«
9+.. . 67 � W=� � �
i
i0 ,.� � 6/ � � ' � b � � �
u ,,..'�' 60 � . N : I �d� �° � .
....
6 .�� . i
x �
�. r<d. ,•.,00 . . � .
4 .
C A S E N 0. GJ �o ' i�-
�
.. _ . _ _ . . . ... . _ _ . . -- - FY '93 ° LIMITS---°-°'-"----------------""---- - .
Hedian
' Southern california Family
Metr000litan Areae incoare 1 Per Z Per 3 Per 4 Per 5 Per 6 Per Psr 8 Per
Anaheim-snnta Ana PMSA $56,500 *Low-income 27,800 31,750 35,750 39,700 42,900 46,050 49,250 52,400
(orange county) Very Low-Incose 19,800 22,600 25,400 28,250 30,500 32,750 35,050 37,300 •
Hakerefield MSA $35,000 Low-InCOme 20,150 23,050 25,900 28,800 31,100 33,100 35�700 38,000
�Rern county) Very Low-Income 12,600 1C,400 16,200 18,000 19,450 20,900 22,300 23,750
-� Loe angelee-i.ong Eeach PMSA $43,000 Lov-incoms a�... �a►;�v�.::ss�;sa�:=sr,ssa=�.a���s� .���,00p 47,900 51,000
� (LOe Angelee county) 9ery Low-incoare 16,900 19,300 21,750 21,150 26,100 28,000 29,950 31,900
oxnard-ventura PMSA $55,200 *LOw-Incoma 27,800 31,750 35,750 39,700 42,900 46,050 49,250 52,�00
(ventura county) Very Low-Zncome 19,300 22,100 24,850 27,600 29,800 32,000 34,200 36,450
Rivereide-San Bernardino PMSA $41,300 Low-Incoms 23,000 26,300 29,600 32,900 35,400 38,150 �0,750 �3,100
(Rivereide-san Eernardino Very Lov-income 10,C00 16,450 18,500 20,550 22,200 23,850 25,500 27,150
Countiee)
San Diego MSA $43,900 Lov-incoma 24,600 28,100 31,600 35,100 37,950 40,750 43,550 46,350
(san uiego county� very Low-Income 15,350 17,550 19,750 21,950 23,700 25,450 27,200 '28,950
Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-LOmpoc 505,500 Low-Incoaa 25,500 29,100 32,750 36,400 39,300 42,200 45,150 {8,050
MSA (Sante Harbara County) Veiy Low-Income 15,950 18,200 20,450 22,750 24,550 26,400 28,200 30,050
southern California � ,
Non-Metro Coi�ntiee � ,
Imperial County $27,700 Lov-Incoms 19,200 21,950 24,700 27,450 29,650 31,850 34,000 36,200
. Very Low-incoms 12,000 13,700 15,�50 17,150 18,500 19,900 21,250 22,650
inyo County S33,600 Low-Income 20,200 23,.100 26,000 28,900 31,200 33,500 35,800 38,100
Very-LOw incoms 12,650 14,450 16,240 18,050 19,500 20,950 22,400 23,850
Mono County $39,600 Low-InCOme 22,200 25,350 28,500 31,700 34,200 36,750 39,300 41,800
Very Low-Income 13,850 15,850 17,800 19,800 21,400 22,950 24,550 26,150
san i.uie obiepo county $40,900 Low-Income 22,900 26,200 29,d40 32,700 35,350 37,950 d0,550 43,200
Very Low-Income 14,300 16,350 18,400 20,450 22,100 23,700 25,350 27,000
*LOw-Income Limit eubject to the nationnl median Lamily income level of 539,700.
NOTEs CALIFORNIA MEDIAN FAXILY INCONE 544�600. l�TRO MEDIAN lAMILY INCOld 545�200.
� NON-METRO MEDZAN FAMILY INCOt� S34,200. � � � ,
�
"� uo i .a �s f -� _ . . � -
�.�-�` , r . i j
�,, { ) � ;
,.._ � , , / �
`�:' , ✓` �.� Z�.:,I/cs I �' '; + �� i l��
, . �� `�z.��
. -� .
,
L��r� �.� �,;,� . ���'� s �f.�._/. �
��� � i' ����
��; , �, �,
� � ��l1��,_.,� ���,�,� ��. ,�=�����,�� ' _
--� �-L� l�'�G�'
. ,/�"�-CL-�c � C�;L.�� - i „r . . ,
��- � � '��� �!C_.- n
�/.,• ,� .�..�� ,.
��� � ( � ` JV
. � �-�%��,..� � �rr?.._lf.� . _ .. . . �
, � _.r� Ci� ��G-(-�U
�
;,�� ��_` ' �
�=� ' -G.?J ' �. y� // :.-ti..
, .�� � .� ��' i �� :�.:�. ....-/
-.c'�.� Gt.�- �_; , . �: .� `" _ � , ,�
r' `/.I`y''._rC r .,l�,J �.t
� G �G�G� Cc.�Ga-�./ = �'��� L.t'.tf_.�/ � !/, ... �
. . �_ �� " ii.. 1 � ( � �,
�/" � �..� "��J��V,,/�� .
� �� �/[.'�..,n...9�14.,.% `Q ,. /�_ 2i �.�s� C/ � .
' C� / � ' � ' / � �� .
��°7>c_<:J .�� �.�e:I[.e"✓
�2��cL.� �{�r �..r ;
,¢ � ��/ ��c �,_,, %1 �. � r ��. � �� �
�l
� . �,C�f�,C.�;,� /� � � -7� / � �=.�r'_�/
�GG�«-G��G+�t.-�;' / �__f<:::�
�l�.�-'z.:� �z�j .�.. � �� �
� �
� f ,
� � .c.-�, i' '', . (. �.L. - ? ' �' ' ;
. ' ' j `_""" . � ! .. :� �,P C: a..l
�C-t �. �.�- .. . , , � .. '
_.-e- ' �a , � !i
`" '� • ' �.�.,f� �-•
� � r� f ; ., .-cr �. _. e..,;�;
�-�--G�'•:z�'_r2 t..,_ ( � �<..,� (� Cvt-r_) �
� /G!_c+1t-E/
�ilii c C-��!�' ��,{� �.� �,.
G /� �/ /��--. �" �' ,`. 1
,��.�.;_�, ��, i
� ' `�`' G.'X..rr_ .i' . �:.„/ Y2. , .. � ., __ , i
� G �,� . D f o c.�r I�,C� ,
�c. _.�<. :- � �..� ���-� _/ • r f , � �
9 z . _ � �,._, �«�� .
/C—�-GJ Gs!ci.�,.._•' ��' ' �
� C-G:r��..c �:-,
�
;.
s
' �.2-� '"�c_�-°- -� ,._ �; ; :� .. � , ' _... ' � ' ,
� ,
_
�
' l -',.�, .,�
�i r'�. . . �
,�
�
/ j _
. . ✓ ' . .• ' � ' ... " .�_ � �i, . .
P >""� �. /. '. `
ti �. ' � , `' ..t,. , C
� . v
: � ,
: ,�/�� �,� � �,_ �
°�, � . �f�,;�..�
�
��3_� ��.z�i
�n � � ;
!'
RESOLUTION NO. 2461
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 125 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
SIXTEEN (16) DWELLING UNITS AT 4291 CARLIN
AVENUE, IN THE R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) �
ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law,
conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and �
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent,
testimony offered at the public hearing; and
;
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined
that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15061 b(3), as amended and is in conformance'
with the State Density Bonus law; dnd
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for,
' development in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone.
_ �
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines as follows:
A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size anci
shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls,,
landscaping, driveways and other development features
required by the Official Zoning Ordinance. �
B_ . The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions,:
- will not have a negative effect on the values of,
surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger
the public, health, safety, or welfare.
� C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current
zoning'regulations and site plan submitted to the Site
Plan Review Committee. :
D.' The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not
adversely affect the General Plan. '
E. The proposed development will add favorably to the
housing stock and will provide additional affordable
priced housing in concert with the policies of the
Housing Element of the General Plan and with the
State of California Housing and Community Development`
(HCD). '
F. The proposed development will aid in aesthetically
upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in
° fostering other quality developments. a.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,"
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby
approves_Conditional Use Permit Case No. 125, provided the
following conditions are observed and complied with at all times.
�
�
,
, -
. f:\resolutn\reso2461 � . ,
1
' • I
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
. ;
1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable
regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform
_ Building Code and the Fire Code.
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or
structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community
Development Department, Planning Division, for rev_iew of
said Conditional Use Permit. �'
3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City.
Departments. '
4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a'
, Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read,�
understands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution
prior to issuance of any building permits. !
PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS `
, 5. The applicant will be subject to all provisions of Section;
25-4.5b, 7, 8 (Special Requirements). ,
6. At least twenty-five (25g) percent of the total units in the
• project are restricted to the rental or purchase by persons
and families of low-�and moderate-income, (three (3) shall
be low-income units and one (1) will be a moderate-income
' unit) as defined in Section 50093 of the California Health,
and Safety Code.
,
_ 7.. Prior to issuance of any development permits related to the
project, the developer shall enter into an Agreement which
shall include, unit price, phasing, outreach methods, deed
restrictions and sale of units to non-target income,
households, financinq, and other affordability methods. �
8. Required affordable units shall be provided equally within
each development.
9. The- developer shall undertake an outreach program for the�
' purpose of notifying potential target income households oft
the availability of affordable units. Said proqram shall be'�
in a form,and of a duration acceptable to the City. �
10. There shall be no physical differentiation between required
affordable and other units, including exterior treatment and',
� design. ' �
, 11. That.the developer shall contract with the Los Angeles�
, , County Housing Authority or an organization approved by the
City of Lynwood to screen potential buyers and tenants toi
' ensure that they meet target income group criteria. 1
12. The certificate of occupancy for a density bonus unit shall'
automatically expire upon vacation of the unit. Prior to
the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the unit, the
Director of Community Development shall determine that it
, will be occupied pursuant to the requirements of Section;
25-4b.7.
,13. The applicant shall submit a map indicating the locations of
dwelling units intended for low and/or moderate income
residents or senior citizens, and further indicating which�
units are for rental and which are for sale, if combined in�
' the same proposal.
,
� f:�resolutn\reso2467 - ' . - - I
, 2 i
�•� 14. Applicant sh�l submit a draft agre�nt suitable for�
� recordability in the office of the County Recorder of Los
Angeles County, as a covenant running with the land, for the
benefit of the City of Lynwood, indicating the number of
dwelling units and also specifying the number of years that
said dwelling units will be continuously available for use
by low and/or moderate income persons or senior citizens.
The availability of dwelling units designated for low and/or
moderate housing shall be effective for a period of not less'
than ten (10) years. If a low to moderate income household
family or senior citizens are occupying the unit at the
expiration of the ten (10) year period, this agreement shall
be extended to a term of fifteen (15) years, pursuant to
State requirements.
15. The developer shall give the City the continuing right-of-
first refusal to purchase or lease any or all of the
designated units at the fair market value.
16. The deeds to the designated units shall contain a covenant
stating that the developer or his/her successor in interest
shall not sell, rent, lease, sublet, assign, or otherwise
transfer any interests for same without the written approval
of the City confirming that the sales price or rental
schedule of the units is consistent with the limits
established for low-and moderate-income households and
senior citizens, which shall be related to the Consumer
Price Index.
17. The City shall have the authority to enter into such other
agreement with the developer and with the renters or
purchasers of the dwelling units, as may be necessary to
assure that the required dwelling units are continuously
occupied by eligible households.
18. Notification of Housing Authority. The Community
Development Department shall refer a copy of the application
for a density bonus to the Executive Director of the Los
Angeles County Housing Authority for review and comment.
The Executive Director shall review such application, and
may submit comments and recommendations concerning such
proposed low and/or moderate income housing as is deemed
appropriate.
19. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood
main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving
the proposed development.
20. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one
hundred and twenty (120) days after the use permitted has
been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised.
21. Construction shall commence within (6) months from date
of issuance of building permits.
22. The.site shall be developed to a maximum of sixteen (16)
dwelling units. Thirteen shall be unrestricted relative to ,
sale price while three (3) shall be set aside as low-income
units and one (1) shall be a moderate-income unit.
23. Landscaped areas shall total a minimum of twenty-five '(25�)
percent of the total lot area.
24. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance
with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the
Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. ,
f:\resolutn\reso2461 � �
3
,
t} The minimum �ant material shall be�ees and shrubs
� combined with ground cover as follows: One (1) five' (5)
gallon shrub for each l00 square feet of landscaped area;,
and two (2) 24" box trees for each 500 square feet of
landscaped areas. The unecessary driveway area at the rear
of the property shall be eliminated for use as landscape,
open space.
, 25. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped
and shall consist predominately of plant materials except
for necessary walks, drives and fences. The applicant shall�
provide a minimum of thirty-five (3,500) sq. ft. of public
open space at the rear of the property and include
recreation equipment such as a spa, barbecue, benches and
tables, appropriate landscaping. All recreation equipment:
, must 'meet with the approval from the Director of Community,
Development prior to installation.
26. A minimum of thirty-two (32) enclosed parking spaces shall,
be provided as well as four unenclosed spaces to be used as
guest parking.
27. A six (6') foot high decorative block wall shall be
installed along the perimeter of the property, except within'
the twenty (20') foot front yard setback. In this frontage,
if built, the wall shall not exceed a height of four (4')�
. feet measured from top of curb, and at the rear of the
property where the wall should be twelve (12) feet in height.
for screening purposes. �
28. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet.
I
29. Final building elevations, including materials of
construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the'
Building official and the Planning Division prior to;
issuance of any building permits. ;
' 30. Before any building permits shall he issued, the developer�'
� shall pay $1.65 per square foot for residential buildings to'
the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government�
Code Section 53080. ;
31. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved with special�
paving treatment provided per approved site plan. �
32. Acoustical construction materials shall be used throughout' �
the units to mitigate freeway noise to the standards and
satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division.
33. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective material
including clay tile roof or concrete tile and other similar-
roofing material that is not reflective, glossy, or polished�
and/or rolled-form type metal roofing, subject to the review�
and approval of the Building Official. �
34. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding ofl
masonite, brick,,stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other;
similar material other than the reflective qlossy, polished
and/or rolled-formed type metal siding, subject to the
review and approval of the Community,Development Department.;
35. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the'
street dedications. �
36. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the,
exterior elevation.of the building must be approved by the
� Director of Community Development or his/her designee. •,
.
,
�
�. f:\resolutn\reso2467 ' � � ', �
4 !.
{
�,
�f 37. Trash areas • all be enclosed by fi� (5') foot high
decorative masonry walls with gates and located in the rear
yard.
38. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in
a consistent manner, including the incorporation within the
side and rear building elevations of same or all of the
design elements used for the primary (front) facades.
39. That the applicant submit elevation drawings to the Planning
Division showinq the exterior building design; including the
specification of colors, and materials.
40. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally
compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent
building. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc.
shall be installed without the prior written approval of the
Director of Community Development. �
41. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment,'
swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical
devices shall be located within the rear yard or street side
yard of corner lot. Such equipment shall be screened from'
surrounding properties and streets and so operated that they
do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring'
residents, in accordance with the City's Noise ordinance
42. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in
sanitary condition pending construction and shall be
maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times.
Failure to comply may result in revocation of the
Conditional Use Permit.
43. The final project design shall be subject to review and
approval of the Director of Community Development.
44. A cover sheet of approved conditions must be attached to
plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety
Division.
45. Entity will maintain a pro-active approach to the
elimination of graffiti from the structures, fences and any
accessory building, on a daily basis.
46. For the purpose of providing heating for any dwelling
proposed, only an energy efficient forced air furnace shall
be used, and that the use of any wall furnace shall be
expressly prohibited.
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
47. Provide documentation that lots composing the property were
legally tied together to the satisfaction of the Department
of Public Works. After reviewing the documents, the
Department of Public Works may require the submission and
recordability of a parcel map or lot merger.
48. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered
Civil Engineer. Property is located within 100 year flood
level zone per flood boundary ap. Also c,onform to all
applicable codes per section 12 1/2 of Lynwood Municipal
Code.
Building above flood level will require substantial amount
of fill, therefore, suggest alternative methods of design to
minimize amount of livable space at ground level. No �
building permits will be issued prior to the approval of
grading plan by City Engineer.
f:\resolutn\reso2461 �
5
f
,
� •
� 49. Reconstruct sidewalk, curb and gutter, and required pavement
along Carlin Avenue.
50. Construct a new drive approach per City standards at Carlin
Avenue.
51. Close existing drive approach and construct proposed P.C.C.
sidewalk and parkway along Carlin Avenue.
52. Construct two (2) wheelchair ramps at southeast and�
southwest corners of Carlin Avenue and Stoneacre Avenue.
53. Install three (3) 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood ,
standards along Carlin Avenue.
54. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass.
55. Provide and install one (1) marbelite street pole with light
fixture, underground services and conduits along Carlin
Avenue. � '
56. Underground all utilities.
57. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all'
off-site improvements.. �
' S8. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire:
protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The
work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by
the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the
Public works/Engineering Division prior to performing any
work.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
59. Provide approved smoke detectors for each unit.
60. Provide approved portable fire extinguisher within 75 feet,'
travel distance.
61. Post "NO PARKING SIGNS" in driveway.
62. If security bars are placed on bedroom windows, they shall'
meet requirements of the U.B.C. Sec 1204.
63. If security gates are installed on premises, the locking
mechanism shall be of the type that does not require a key
or any special knowledge to exit premises. Also, provide a:
Knox box at entrance, contact Bureau of Fire Prevention for
information.
64. Provide a minimum 150 feet four inches (150' 4" dry fire
line. (Obtain specific requirements from Fire Department.)
Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered
to the applicant.
f:\planning\resolutn\reso2461
6
,� � `
'}i � .
i
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of ,
1993, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: '
;
AYES:
NOES:
r
ABSENT: -
ABSTAIN: ,
�
Elizabeth Dixon, Chairperson ;
APPROVED"AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ;
, I
Sol Blumenfeld, Director Kenneth Fong
Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney
7
�
I
i
i
�
'
� f:\resolutn\reso2467 � � � .
. i
i
7 �
�� � �
AGF�!�A I��i N0.
DATE: June 8, 1993 /
�r��� ��0. �'�
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director G�
Community Development Department
,SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 126
Applicant: Tarcicio Vasquez
Proposal•
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to establish
and operate an automobile sales lot at 11605 Long Beach Boulevard
in the C-2A (Medium Commercial) zone.
Facts•
1. Source of Authoritv
Section 25-16 (c) of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that
a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to operate any
business with respect to automotive use.
2. Property Location
The subject property consists of a single trapezoidal shaped �
lot on the west side of Long Beach Boulevard between Lynwood �
Road and Louise Avenue (See attached Location Map). I
3. Propertv Size
;
The subject property is approximately 7,901 square feet in �
size. �
i
4. Existina Land Use
i
The subject site is flat and contains two (2) existing i
structures. The surrounding land uses are as follows:
North-Commercial East-Commercial �
South-Commercial West-Residential �
5. Land Use Description � �
General Plan: Zonina• �
,
North- Commercial North- C-3
South- Commercial South- C-3 �
East- Commercial East- C-3 �
West- Residential - West- R-1
'
,
�
f:\s[affrp[\cup126 ' ' '
�
1 I
�
� � , .
�,�
6. Proiect Characteristics:
The applicant proposes to develop and operate an automobile,
sales lot. A total of twelve (12) display parking spaces and
five (5) employee parking spaces, including one (1) handicap
space, is proposed for the auto sales use. An existing
office is proposed to be renovated. An eicisting separate
handicap restroom will be redesigned as a part of the
,, proposed office. A rear portion of the site is unprogrammed
in the proposed design. Seven (7�j percent of the site is
' proposed for landscaping. The site will include a trash
enclosure.
7. Site PTan-Review �
At a meeting on February 25, 1993, the Site Plan Review
Committee evaluated the proposed development and recommended
_ approval to the Planning Commission subject to the conditions
and requirements stated in the attached Resolution.
8. Zoning Enforcement Historv
None of record at the time this report was completed.
9. Public Response �
None of record at the time this report was prepared.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION:
1. Consistency with General Plan
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning,
`, classification (C-2A) Medium Commercial and General Plan
designation of Commercial. Therefore, granting Conditional
Use Permit No. 126 will not adversely affect the General
Plan.
2. Site Suitabilitv . .
The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
proposed development relative to structures, parking, walls,:
fences, landseaping, driveways and other development features
reqtiired by the Zoning Ordinance. ,
3. Comoatibilitv !
� The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of
commercial developments; therefore, the project will be
compatible with the surrounding land uses. However;
residential uses are to the west of the proposed use.
�
4. Compliance with Development Standards °
The proposal meets the development standards required by the
' Zoning Ordinance with respect to setbacks, lot coverage,�
building height and parking.
� 5. Conditions of Approval �
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have
a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties ,
or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or
welfare. '..
' f:\staffrpt\cup126 . � � � � _ �
` 2
,
� � � � � � ,
� f:\staffrpt\cup126 .. . .
y
6. Benefits ta Communitv . ' � �
The proposal will assist in upgrading the commercial use of'
the property and support the commercial intent of the General',
Plan.
7. Environmental Assessment
The Community Development Department Staff has determined
that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section'
15061b(3) of the State of California EnvironmentaT Quality
Act of 1989 as amended. ,
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2463: '
1. Certifying that project is categorically exempt from the'
provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by ,
Section 15061b(3).
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 126, subject to the
stated conditions and requirements.
ATTACHMENTS•
1. Location Map
� 2. Site Plan '
3. Resolution No. 2463
� -
�
}
�
� f:\staffrpt\cup126 . � � , � . �
3 .
._ . . . .. . . ... ..... _�
_. _... ..--...--- _.
, _.. --..
_._.__ ----.
.� —_ ------ _. _....
� � -- -- ----- -- ..
LOCATION iVIAP
/ � �. ... T - � _. . . __ .
�10� � �� / CG h /(0). ISII�FIa��� � i / ' ,
l . `' J '� ,,,�/ �` � s.! p .� � /lT�� y I'
� / o t ti
� �s' s„ F^ yul�( � � __ N ...
^ ° a �2 sit rii
� b� ^)� �y ^� � ��y,q � ��4� � / � � .yt— _
aar ^' '� � � ��iisiq' - y � /�s�� �
. / "' ` N
. • e� ^ J � �� I1510 ' u6J/
'a �' � �� isa ,r.
�Dw. . � `OJ ssa - ui „s ��
'� ,� �" � � x, R � s�s
ro� Q"� .1rve. sa '� ye ii��'� i a'3 �� . ,
ai � . . /itY
� •s �� � ,r�i53� ' ps ^ � � .
.�
D
9 ro ,`,� �, �� �P , y�—tt
� � m�. n I s � @ � lie lis,r
,� -�
/ / ^� � i� � � P � 3 , s� S iT
s' �� '� � ., �o
� 9^ � � NO V .
7�
/ S��
� ^�� ^ �'� "'�� Z a R eos . �.i I / � � '° �
. � ,�^� ,i , n° o . �s� ; i !J � �. �oc'
• , M'/ 6't�,a soa x�, � 4r^� , suuL
; . � .� ^� /n�' ° `�" QAD //b y �u � ��� � . �.
� J .`�� � s p ao r� �u //4�� y 3a7y 'J . �
F � � J
�;�s � � J c7V � e. / , dl . � , �`' v . .
.b a,; � � p
/ �e h . � �'� .o �:.�:"5='f. '
�� -, � s � . , � ,
�i,�,��, � ,�,: R �� x _ ', S
/ �, � �t �. . �g .,.. .
. / y �.. � °'° `� '„��� 't' "�
:� �-�, °
^�,� _ i �� � � ,
M ^�^ � M °�e � ,,,�, A � 6„ � ,4,�» -�� ��'� ,� l � ;:�;;.
b
� � 1 / Y m . � :".,�.
•'Sn �ro b'� 1 7�i &x
� ro n � �7 e,�� . e/i yjy .
J )� W �, . A �'i' M / M1 �O!/ . ` y //7 ]Y �71 R� .
7 z
l. ��� • b . 'p � ^.. O''n ^ 6t2� v J '(�� � pJw . . .
h � , ��N� ,h . � M7 ��7� 11 ) � fl .:�+ `'v • ` l,ir .�5 ^��� � .
� �
. � .a Y ��\ �,i�
,.
CASE N0. � ��� �
�
,; � �
� RESOLUTION N0. 2463
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 126 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND
OPERATION OF AN AUTO SALES LOT IN
THE C-2A (MEDZUM COMMERCIAL) ZONE,
11605, LONG BEACH BOULEVARD,
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA..
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing- on the subject
application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered all'
pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined'
" that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines Section b(3) as amended; and
WHEREAS, the project is consistent with the intent of .the
General Plan in that the subject site is classified C-2A (Medium
Commercial);
Section i. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines as follows:
A. That the granting of the proposed Conditional Use Permit�
will not adversely affect the General Plan.
B. That the proposed location of the Conditional Use is in
accord with the objectives of the Zoning ordinance and
the purpose of the zone in which the site is located.
C. That the proposed location of the Conditional Use and the
conditions under which it would be operated or maintained
will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity;
D. That the proposed Conditional Use Permit will comply with
each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance
as stated in the conditions below;
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood �
approves the proposed project subject to the.following
conditions:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable
regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform
Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code.
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or
structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community
Development Department, Planning Division, for review.
3. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement ;
of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and
agrees to the conditions stated herein before any building
permits are issued.
f:\resolutn:reso2463
1
� � �
.�
PLANNING DIVISION
4. This permit shall become void one hundred twenty (120) days,
unless extended, after the use permitted has been abandoned
or has ceased to be actively exercised.
5. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood
main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving
the proposed development.
6. All necessary permits and licenses shall be obtained prior to
operations.
AUTOMOBILE AND TRAILER SALES LOTS ,
7. The sale of new or used vehicles, shall required approval of
a Conditional Use Permit.
8. The complete plans, showing the location and design of all
buildings, structures, signs, lights, fences, bumpers or
barricades and the proposed development thereof, including
landscaping, shall first be submitted to, and be approved by.
the Site Plan Review Committee, prior to any consideration by
the Planning Commission.
9. The entire area of the subject lot shall be surfaced,
thereafter maintained in good condition with not less then a
two-inch thickness of blacktop or other equally serv,iceable
hard surface pavement, and prior to the laying of such
surfacing, the entire area shall be effectively treated with
a weed destroyer.
10. The property shall be attractively maintained in a neat and
orderly condition, and the business conducted thereon shall
be operated in a manner so as not to be detrimental to others
residing or working in the vicinity.
11. Adequate devices or structures shall be installed and
maintained so as to protect'any boundary line fence, wall or
building from damage, and to prevent any part of a vehicle
from extending across any public or private property lines
and that such installations and the maintenance thereof shall
be in conformance with standards and specifications approved
by the Community Development Department.
12. Open areas shall be used solely for the display of new and
used vehicles, and shall not be used for the display of.
vehicles acquired for dismantling purposes of vehicles
classified as total loss.salvage vehicles.
13. No advertising sign, structure or devise, whether temporary
or permanent in character, shall be erected or maintained
upon premises without the design thereof and the proposed
location having first been submitted to the Director of
Community Development for approval. Temporary advertising
' devise shall include but not limited to: banners, balloons,
flags, pennants, valance, or light fabric, cardboard,
wallboard, plywood, or other light material, as well as any
mechanical, audible or animated statuary device. Temporary
advertising devices shall be approved by the Director of
Community Development prior to their installation.
14. Daily operating hours shall be from 7:00 a.m., to.9:00 p.m. '
15. Reflect artificial light away from adjoining properties.
16. No damaged or wrecked vehicles shall be stored on site. No
portion of the site shall be used for storage unless it is
sales related activity.
f : \reso t utn\ reso2G63
2
.
� �
:� �
17. On-site traffic circulation and parking should be developed
in such a manner that ingress and egress accesses are�
separated or channeled so that conflicting'traffic movements,
are minimized.
18. The premises shall be kept in a neat and orderly condition at'
all times and all improvements shall be maintained in a
condition of reasonable repair and appearance. Used or
discarded automotive parts or equipment or permanently
disabled, junked or wrecked vehicles shall not be stored on'.
site at any time. '
.
19. The property shall be used solely for auto sales only.'
20. A solid decorative masonry combination wall with ornamental'
iron, designed to include split block or other decorative
finish, subject to approval of the Director of Community
Development, will be erected and attractively maintained
along all property lines. ',
21. All mechanical ventilating equipment shall be directed to top
story exhaust vents which face away from adjacent residential
properties.
22. All signage must be reviewed and approved by the Planning,
Building and Redevelopment Divisions.
LANDSCAPING
23. Seven percent (7%) of the total site area shall be improved�
with landscape including trees, shrubs and ground covers.
Landscaped areas shall have an irrigation system installed.
Landscape plans shall be subject to the review and approval
by the Director of Community Development.
24. The applicant is required to submit a landscape plan drawn by
a licensed landscape architect to the satisfaction of the
Director of Community Development prior to any building
permit being issued. •
25. All planting shall be beds of a minimum width of five feet
(5') except where landscape area accommodates driveway
curves, and a minimum area throughout the parking area. Zn
addition, all parking aisles shall have planter areas at each
end. A minimum of six (6') feet of landscaped setback shall �
be required at the rear of the property abutting the
residential uses.
26. The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs combined
with ground cover as follows: One(1) five (5) gallon shrub
for each twenty (20) square feet of planter area; two (2)
fifteen (15) gallon trees for each ten (10) parking spaces.
27. The planter area along property frontage must be landscaped
with shrubs and ground cover, and, a wrought iron fence
(maximum forty-two (42") inches) shall be installed along ;
planter area per approved plans.
28. All landscaping shall be permanently maintained. Lawn or
ground cover areas are to be trimmed or mowed regularly, with �
all planted area kept free of weeds and debris.
All plantings are to be kept in a healthy and growing .
condition. An automatic sprinkler or irrigation system shall
be provided and maintained in working condition.
f:\resolutn\reso2463
3
, � �
:,
-,
29. A decorative wall shall be erected between the subject site
and the adjacent residential areas. The wall shall be a
minimum of six (6') feet in height and landscaped with trees
and ground cover per approved plans.
30. Prior to the installation or construction of any fence or
masonry wall within any zone, the property owner shall obtain
a permit and submit the following information to the Planning
Division of the Community Development Department.
a. A simple plot plan showing the location of fence or
masonry wall in relation to the property lines, heights,
proposed materials, and openings or gates to provide
access for vehicles and pedestrians.
b. For masonry walls a building permit shall be applied for
upon approval of the plot plan described above. All
masonry walls of any height shall meet the requirements
for masonry construction as defined in Chapter 24 of the
Uniform Building Code. A fee based on the valuation of
the proposed construction shall be paid to the Building�
Division.
31. All fences or masonry walls skiall be required to be installed
with a finished, aesthetically pleasing side facing out
toward adjacent properties or the public right-of-way to the
satisfaction of the Community Development Director.
32. There shall be a minimum of two (2) parking spaces and one
(1) handicap parking space provided on the site.
33. Each off-street parking spaces for employees shall not be
less than twenty (20) feet in length and nine (9) feet in'
width, exclusive of access driveways or aisles, except as
noted below:
34. A parking space designed for the handicapped shall be
provided. This space may be provided as follows:
a. Dimensions. The minimum dimensions of each automobile
parking stall for the handicapped shall be not less than
fourteen (14) feet in width by eighteen (18) feet in
length. Said stalls shall be lined to provide a nine (9)
foot parking area and a five (5) foot loading and
unloading area or;
b. Additional spaces for display parking may be provided
within'a twenty-three (23) 'foot wide area, lined to
provide a nine (9) foot parking area. The minimum length
of each parking space shall be eighteen (18) feet.
c. Location. All parking spaces for the handicapped shall
be located adjacent to the main entrance of the facility
for which the spaces are provided. The parking spaces
shall be positioned so that the handicapped persons shall
not be required to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles.
35. The parking arrangement for the subject site shall have a
circular flow arrangement without dead-end aisl'es when
possible. -
36. The applicant shall submit elevation drawings to the Planning
Division showing the exterior building design; including the
specification of colors, and materials. Prior to the .
issuance of building permits, the design of the subject
building including color and materials, must obtain approval
by the Community Development Director.
f:\resolutn\reso2463 . . � ' _
4
. � �
i
37. Prior to the installation, display, enlarging, modifying
relocating or chanqing of signs, a permit must be obtained
from the Department of Community Development, Planning
Division.
38. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally
compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent
buildings. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc.
shall be installed without the prior written approval of the
Director of Community Development and required building
permits.
39. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in a
sanitary condition pending construction and shall be
maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times.
Failure to comply may result in revocation of the.Conditional
Use Permit.
40. A cover sheet of approved Conditions must be attached to
plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety
Division.
41. Any violation of said conditions in this resolution may
result in revocation or modification of the Conditional Use
Permit by the issuing body at a regularly scheduled meeting.
CODE ENFORCEMENT
42. The owner will maintain a pro-active approach to the
elimination of graffiti from any structure, fences or
accessory building at the site. Daily inspections will be'
conducted in order to have all graffiti removed by 12:00 p.m.
43. Maintenance of sidewalk, parking area, gutters and all
surrounding area will be done at least once a day before
starting of operations.
44. Parking area will be maintained at all times either by the
owner employees or a commercial parkinq cleaning company.
45. Owner will not allow/authorize any other uses except listed
in their business licence.
46. A trash enclosure shall be provided, sufficient in size, to
meet the refuse needs of the establishment.
47. Parking area(s) shall not be used as "rental space" for
commercial trucks.
PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DIVISION
48. Submit a copy of property deed or recent title report to the
Department of Public Works.
49. Dedicate a three (3) wide strip of property along Long Beach
Boulevard.
50. Submit a drainage plan. Drainage plan will be checked by
Department of Pubic Works. No permits will be issued prior
to the approval of drainage plan.
51. Extend three (3) foot wide sidewalk behind back of sidewalk, �
along frontage property and relocate existing.chain link
fence behind new property line.
� f:\resolutn\reso2463 �- � "
5
�;
� �
i�
52. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all
off-site improvements.
53. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire
protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The
work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the
developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the
Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any
work.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
NO COMMENTS
Section 3. A copy of Resolution 2463 shall be delivered to
the applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1993,
by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Elizabeth Dixon, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: '
Sol Blumenfeld, Director Ken Fong
Community Development Department Deputy District Attorney
' . •
f:\resoluTn\reso2463 � �
I
I
6