The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal AboutA1993-07-13 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ��0 F � • � ';.. . . I AGENDA LYNWOOD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ' REGULAR MEETING - 7:30 p.m. � - City Hall Council Chambers 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, CA July 13, 1993 Elizabeth Dixon � Chairperson Donald Dove Carlton McMiller • Vice Chairman Commissioner Errick Lee Roy Pryor Commissioner Commissioner Jamal Muhsin Joyce Hurley Commissioner Commissioner C O M M I S S I O N C 0 U N S E L: Henry S. Barbosa Kenneth Fong City Attorney Deputy City Attorney. STAFF: i Sol Blumenfeld, Director Louis Omoruyi I Community Development Department Associate Planner � i Art Barfield John Oskoui ' � Associate Planner Assistant Director � Public Works ' � Louis E. Morales, Jr. Associate Planner I � � I i I I � I I I ' f:\agendaVuly93 � I 1 i I I . n a � ��`, r' � • � ;41��1 �� II. lylii . . � + ' ( I ll i�, IJI,� �.;.� July 13, 1993 OPENING CEREMONIES A. Call meeting to order. B. Flag salute. C. Installation of an appointed Planning Commissioner and re- organization. D. Roll call of Commissioners. E. Certification of Agenda Posting. F. Approval of minutes for the June 8, 1993 Planning Commission I Meeting. � I PUBLIC HEARING: i 1. VARIANCE CASE NO. 20 Applicant: Jagdishandra Patel COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a Variance to reduce the � required parking from sixteen (16) parking spaces to fourteen (14) parking spaces in order to maintain a fourteen � (14) unit motel at 3553-57 Imperial Highway in the C-2 � (General Commercial) zone, Lynwood, California. RECOMMENDED ACTION: � � Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning.Commission approve the Variance request. � 1. Finding that a hardship has been established that would i require a Variance for Case No. 20 as determined by � Section 25-26 of the City of Lynwood Zoning Code. � � 2. Finding that the applicant will be deprived of � privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in i the same vicinity if a recommendatiori of denial is ' approved. , 2. VARIANCE CASE NO. 21 � Applicant: Kidney Dialysis � COMMENTS• I The applicant is requesting a variance to reduce the ! required parking by ten (10) spaces and to include compact � spaces in order to partially fulfill the parking requirement of thirty-six (36) parking spaces at a existing medical use ; at 3600-3608 E. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., in the HMD i (Hospital-Medical-Dental) zone. RECOMMENDED ACTION: I i Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission approval of the Variance request. 1. Finding that a hardship has been established that would � require a Variance for Case No. 20 as determined by � Section 25-26 of the City of Lynwood Zoning Code. � f:\agendaU uLy93 - I I z I I i f • 2. Findin�that the applicant wi� be deprived of �: privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same vicinity if the recommendation of denial is upheld. 3. VARIANCE CASE NO. 22 Applicant: Lee Davenport COMMENTS: � The applicant is requesting approval of a Variance, Case No. 22, to legalize an existing unit and construct a two (2) car carport at 11195 Louise Avenue in the R-3 (Multi-Familyj zone. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff respectfully requests that after cons`ideration, the Planning Commission continue this case until the August 10, 1993 Planning Commission meeting. 4. VARIANCE CASE NO. 23 Applicant: Eliu Saulcedo COMMENTS• ' The applicant is requesting a Variance to increase the I height of a proposed fence from 42" to 7' in order to i maintain an auto repair at 2991 Imperial Highway in the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone, Lynwood, California. i RECOMMENDED ACTION: � Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the � Planning Commission approve the Variance request, i 1. Finding that a hardship has been established that would ! require a Variance for Case No. 23 as determined by Section 25-26 of the City of Lynwood Zoning Code. 2. Finding that granting of the Variance as Conditionecl � will not constitute the granting of a special privilege ' inconsistent with the limitations on other.properties in � the same zone. 3. Finding that granting of the Variance will not adversely � affect the orderly development of the City, f i 4. That there are exceptional or extraordinary i circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved which do not apply generally to other �' properties in the same zone. i 5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 128 ' ' Applicant: Frank Darmiento ' , COMMENTS: ' � The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit in ; order to refurbish an existing residential motel for I conversion to a 16 unit residential motel at 11330 Long ! Beach Boulevard in the C-2A (Medium Commercial) zone. i RECOMMENDED ACTION: � i Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the ; Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2480.� : ; 1. Certifying that project is'categorically exempt from the ! provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by � Section 15061b(3). ' � - f:\agendaU u1y93 , i i � , � 3 � i i � � � � I 1 ! 2. Approvi� Conditional Use Permit �8, subject to the ;: stated conditions and requirements. 6. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE N0. 129 Applicant: Wilbur owens COMMENTS: I The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop a single family dwelling at 11733 First' Avenue in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. RECOMMENDED ACTION: ' " Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopts the attached Resolution No. 2482., 1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061b(3). 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit case No. 129 subject to the stated conditions and requirements. 7. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 130 i Applicant: Wilbur Owens COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use i Permit to develop a single family dwelling at 11727 First ' Avenue in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. � � i RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the � Planning Commission adopts the attached Resolution No. 2483.' 1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from i the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061b(3). ' 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit Case No. 130 subject to � the stated conditions and requirements. � 8. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 131 I Applicant: Wilbur Owens , COMMENTS• The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop a single family dwelling at 11739 First � Avenue in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. ; RECOMMENDED ACTION: , � Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the � Planning Commission adopts the attached Resolution No. 2484. I 1. Certif in that the � y g project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061b(3). ; 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit Case No. 131 subject to the stated conditions and requirements. � � f j f:\agendaU u1y93 . . i 4 � , 9. GENERAL PLAN�ENDMENT CASE NO. 7 • � y' Applicant: A. Sean Dayani ; COMMENTS• � The applicant is requesting approval of a General Plan' Amendment (GPA 7) from Town House & Cluster Housing to a� Commercial designation for an area, the subject property,' approximately 75,000 square feet in size in order ot consider future commercial development for the area on the� west side of Atlantic Avenue, between Lavinia and Carlin� Avenue, in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. RECOMMENDED ACTION: . � Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the' Planning Commission deny the application for General Plan. Amendment No. 7 f 10. ZONE CHANGE CASE NO. 7 � Applicant: H. Sean Dayani � � COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting approval of a Zone Change from� R-2 (Two-Family Residential) to C-2 (Commercial) for an" area, the subject property, approximately 75,000 square feet. in size in order to consider future commercial development; . for the area on the west side of Atlantic Avenue, between Lavinia and Carlin Avenue in the R-2 (Two-Family� Residential) zone. RECOMMENDED ACTION: I Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the; Planning Commission deny the application for Zone Change No.' 7. � 11. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP CASE NO. 29 � Applicant: James Oh COMMENTS• The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map' No. 23834 for the purpose of consolidating lots 277-297,� . inclusive and alley, of Tract No. 15016, for the purpose of� construction of a warehouse, food market, office spaces and retail stores. The consolidation is required as one of the' conditions for Conditional Use Permit No. 90 and Resolution� No. 2400. ; RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the ; Planning Commission continue this case until the August 10,- 1993 Planning Commission meeting pursuant to the applicant's� request. ; . ; , ; ' j f:\agenda\july93 � 5 . ,, i � REGULAR ORDER OF �INESS � r None STAFF COMMENTS � Fence Height Ordinance Move-On Ordinance ' Auto Sales/Auto Use Ordinance COMMENTS: � PUBLIC ORALS ' i COMMISSION ORALS ' ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to the regular meeting of . the Planning Commission on August 10, 1993 at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall Council Chambers,' 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California. , i f:\agendaVuly93 � �� i i , i � 6 � ,'�,. AGEN IT�M Nt�. 1 -- ( �`u DATE: July 13 �993 � CASE ��--- . � ,_ .�_ T0: PLANNING COMMISSION �� FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director � Community Development Depa tment SUBJECT: Variance Case No. 20 Applicant: Jagdishandra Patel Pronosal• The applicant is requesting a Variance to reduce the required parking from sixteen (16) parking spaces to fourteen (14) parking spaces in order to legalize a bedroom, bath, and laundry room addition, and maintain a fourteen (14) unit motel at 3553-57 Imperial Highway, in the C-2 (General Commercial) zone, Lynwood, California. Facts 1.Source of Authoritv. • Section 25-26 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that a I Variance be obtained from the Planning Commission because of i , special circumstances applicable to the property, and when strict application of the Zoning Ordinance deprives such � property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. � 2. Prooertv Location and Size I The site is located between California Avenue and Birch Street on Zmperial Highway. (Please refer to the attached � location map). It is a rectangular shaped parcel and is � measured at approximately 15,000 square feet in size. I 3. Existinq Land Use The subject site is surrounded by the following land uses: , North - Multi-Family Residential � South - Institutional/COmmercial East - Institutional/Commercial i West - Mult-Family Residential/Commercial � 4. Land Use Description - General Plan Zoning North - Multi- Family Residential R-3 � South - Commercial �_Z, � East - Commercial �_2 West - Commercial �_2 I 5. ProZect Characteristics The property is currently developed with fourteen (14) motel I units and a manager's unit. Parking is available for each unit except the manager's unit. The applicant proposes to develop a bedroom, bath, and laundry room for an existing manger's unit. The subject property contains, approximately, one (1�) percent landscaping. � 6. Site Plan Review ' At its regular meeting of July 1, 1993, the Site Plan Review � j Committee reviewed and recommended approval o£ the Variance I request. � . � 1 ' i i' :; � � f:\staffrpt\var20 7. Zonincx Enforcement Historv ' On December 4, 1990, the Code Enforcement Division sent a Final Non-Compliance letter to the applicant requiring that two (2) garages illegally converted to living space (bedroom)' with a 3/4 bath be legalized, deconverted, or demolished. It was required that the violations be abated no later then December 18, 1990 (see Exhibit 4. Non-Compliance Letter, ' 12-4-1990). On January 29, 1993, the applicant was sent a Final Non- Compliance letter requiring that the violations cited in the 12/4/90 Non-Compliance letter be legalized, or deconverted to original usage, and abated, no later then March 24, 1993. 8. Neiqhborhood Resbonse None of record at the time of preparation of the staff report. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: I 1. Consistencv with General Plan I � The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning � classification C,-2 and the General Plan designation of Commercial. ' 2. Site Suitabilitv , � I The site can accommodate the proposed development in , connection with the lot area, lot width, and yard, � requirements. However, the lot is substandard in that it does meet current development standards relative to parking. , Therefore, a Variance is required for the project. j 3. Compatibility � The proposed addition to the use is generally compatible with � other uses on neighboring properties, though the proposed use i will not conform to the existing motel standards relative to parking. � 4. Comoliance with Development Standards Findings: � The property is a legal non-conforming use which, as ;' developed, does not provide for adequate off-street parking � pursuant to Section 25.14.6.5 of the Official Zoning , ordinance. Therefore, there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property involved which do i not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or for the same use. Under Ordinance No. 1377, Section 24-9.1 C. 2. b. (adopted � May 21, 1992) the Zoning Code requires one (1) off-street ' parking space per room and one (1) off-street parking space � per six rooms for employee parking. It came to Staff's attention, after the application had been filed, that the � motel maintains a staff of one (1) employee. Therefore, the � applicant is required to have sixteen (15) parking spaces. � In addition, the subject use is required to have a minimum I lot area of two (2) acres and landscaping consisting of a' fifteen (15) foot front and rear yard and five (5) foot side ' _ yards. With a 15,000 square foot site, the applicant cannot ' meet current Code requirements. In addition, the subject use i is required to be within 1500 of a freeway, or within 1500 ' feet of the I-105 Century Freeway. � I i I 2 � � � � ! Granting of � Variance will not be �trimental to the public health, afety, or welfare, or mat ally injurious to 'S properties or improvement in the vicinity. Granting of the Variance will not adversely affect the orderly development of the City. Granting of this Variance would not set a precedent in the . City that would be replicated elsewhere. Staff recommends approval of the subject project Variance for the reduction of required parking. 5. Environmental Assessment The Community Development Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to section 15061 b(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act of 1989 as amended. RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the � i Planning Commission approval of the Variance request. I A. Finding that a hardship has been established that would I I require a Variance for Case No. 20 as determined by' I Section 25-26 of the City of Lynwood Zoning Code. i B. Finding that the applicant/property owner will be j deprived of the privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same vicinity if the recommendation of ; denial is upheld. I Attachments• � i 1. Location Map � 2. Resolution No. 2478 ' 3. Site Plan � 4. Non-Conpliance letter Dated 12/18/90 , 5. Non-Compliance letter Dated 1/29/93 � ; i � � I I � ' , � f:\staffrpt\ver20 � � � i � 3 � � I — -- ..— — ... , � Z LOCATION iVIAP :i i � �, � V - ^� Q ai R ai u -- - e! - af � ea - f - e� ai +c 6 3s�` % ` v � 'i I �t� �si�n � -- � 5��3 36b5 3S13I3S71I3SP� 358sI3SJt ,jj5�2 v , �� ,.9SG0 M .ffJ7 x)s Sr)iI tEb�t] . tl M ', .. � " ,veiv✓ �V£NUe' h • : ob ab /1000� 70 � to �v a� ro I ao to I w w ao .ro I w fo so � i . )D'1 �. v° o � o lx S. � 25 �� / ; `' rn �� .� ,� m � ,� � do J fY � v O I a o, cd o rlS a ,9, � 1;8- p o � 04 ° S � i� � � ^ �, P � a b e�i' " r `\ °� '° � �~ ° I `s � � �C � �.p/ ya3` � � ; .. c¢.Y. � �. � h � �, � �, �, �, � � � , Si } � � M M I "' t'1 I, O. M I � � I M M �, M I n � m M I M � ` i 'S �� . ��. �`� � ',' >� o � ro so �o � w �� :a .m w ueo � : ; ��pyy: . � 7 L - � � � UoZ g. t 1: 7 •79 - eY � � I ^ � r� � I� � I , �, � ... i � iv $ so � s � i °' s a M s � v s �s n�1 c b �J r� I:. �or. � � io a o $ 6 � i � y� r7 ra . � � �n �o � � �°,° l �n9� 1� �^'P � o f ` � '� � o o�� ; � .. � lioYO$ 2S!l � � " ^' M (*� M M M m I (ti � o M �a /�� b `i f S0� m o 60 � So 3b� 10 .90 0 3o so Sa w � , � � O JJ IltD Q f� � ♦ � J � ` 5 ia l L p I s � � 70 � JO IO '�o O / 0 �p I�f , T Jo 10� 1 �° � tr� �� I? �. ... I - .� o�3 ,`9, a J�, b o � "� �� 2- I a � n,a .n � �� I uo li�o'� �,.',l '7 (�b Ib �� b �a i� ` �ro M I�� I`'�"'+ I�ti� . r�., 9� �� . , r� �h h ,� l i� 0? 1 6 9 M� 6 B M 7 6 6. 6� rif� 6 � ro 6 2 M� 6%. 9 o q i „ �¢6 .' � � � � 4j � ,o S � 2 �II� � I I I ' I� I {O �`�� ` Jik j ��IAO � .fa ao p P e 2 I � e u _ � I I I I I a o ,,a '� �,: .. � ar ,• P �ae i1'i �M i�s �� ,, �� , i�q .t4` �so � �.�� sz is r.0 : .$ ��+°� � 3�. QQ U�`�,�; � I MI e � I 1� y I�n h 1`� M� ro :'8 P � • — !0 fn M nl. O !� SO M 'Q �� ( H/GHWA I . '� ' rv � w � ID • � ° /�7� g - � ti � m n � A b �.� s 'n o 0o a' g h �6S ^ I 6 6 ro163 r' . M��" b 4 �„ I`� 4 �� hb . M � . Ll�. iL(t� / /6jm M /�0''O M/5ir+ �y/SB /57 !ti 6 � /55 � iro m' ri874 Y///Y � � 5 I �� `� ieez,r � sL�ra — - � <—.T.Tr.,, � a 3 g/u9 � � � j �y I �$ M I x ; °3 s�,� /� iea iq� ic}r;, iar � i.�o ,�.�i ar �s�„ � �8 ^��k a I �� ` � 1�6a 7 303I36�7 �» , 3s�s� ; "' I,� M b � � � ; � � i a „ i � ;' � �, m '� ao 3S eo '" �. Ja n, .� b t� n ro I M I"� "' I R� 5 � ro^S ro ro so r, m� ,81� � ss� � . � AVENUE � I . d � h � %y � � ^� �° �Q 7 a ro � si " s ,ar� � � � � ' I IIdoD Y � _` - M I� �n �'e b � t � �� y y �6' � b � Ib I�' � I ' o � 4 I �° °�x � I � I� M J � M„M� �`�' � J� �� I �OS LOD j�Q j� r�E M I07 M ZOl AN� ZN/ / I M �/9 � /9 i� �/h' M11 � I, m M� / - i ` �, I p � , � �i 9 I � � � ��' I � I I � � � � �' / � I � ��3� ,s N �� ; � I I � �� I � I � � I --� � J� 66-- 167 \ t6� y. Z�9 � Z7k!!,� a17/ I � 7R� 17� � 176 Z Z 7� � l � 7 il�?'� . C/7Y L i j � ��ab I� l� io b�� n �� fn 'h I� p` ^ n� '"I�7 I �� So0 �'• 'a �ih �l T � A� i0 I h i N Jo��7 �u� Ib C> � I th �n t��i 1 \' II . � � / I s 7 w so .c o , AVENUE $ a! ° o o ^ M I ' l 4 , 'Q �` � v 9 cv .a a • ee c .e wa / I 1 fS� �� 'Y of M ~ � l" �' I� ti � y �+ � v y I^o o • 4.7" �.. ° . � �ar r�e rq� zae �ze�� ' z�� %' z�� , j �M M I,h � � A M �,� � � -�\> !/3/Y � � � � Zgl Z� 1�7 71$ 1 / JGatE:�•.iao' . i I I I � CASE N0. �,� � ; _ '� . , - _ __ .; r „ � � � ., _„ � f:\staffprt\var20 Granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvement in the vicinity. ' Granting of the Variance will not adversely affect the . orderly development of the City. Gzanting of this Variance would not set a precedent in the . City that would be replicated elsewhere, GLJT1fL7^ ?1Yf3LLl'�P-t--�--1 ° r7 �,y: 9 ri + �� P�,1 O< P n.'{Ylr � � ti aces as�ho n on tt,P � �a ri =r� ! Staff recommends approval of the subject project Variance for, the reduction of required parking. 5. Environmental Assessment The Community Development Department Staff has determined� that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to section; � 15061 b(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act of 1989 as amended. RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the , ` Planning Commission approval of the Variance request. A. Finding that a hardship has been established that would' require a Variance for Case No. 20 as determined by� Section 25-26 of the City of Lynwood Zoning Code. B. Finding that the applicant will be deprived of' privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same vicinity it a recommendation of denial is approved. Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Resolution No. 2478 3. Site Plan 4. Non-Conpliance letter Dated 12/18/20 � 5. Non-Compliance letter Dated 1/29/93 I I f:\staffrpt\var20 , I + I . � � 3 4 �;a • RESOLUTION NO. 2478 • Y A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A VARIANCE REQUEST (CASE NO. 20) TO REDUCE TI3E REQUIRED PARKING FROM SIXTEEN (16) SPACES TO FOURTEEN (14) STANDARD SPACES, AND TO PROVIDE TWO (2) EMPLOYEE PARKING SPACES IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN A MOTEL WITH A PROPOSED BEDROOM/LAUNDRY ADDITION AT 3553-57 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, IN THE C-2 � (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, pursuant to law, held a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully consideTed all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the project is consistent with the intent of the General Plan in that the subject site is classified C-1 {General Commercial). � WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from provisions of the�"State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061b (3), as amended. Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of ' Lynwood hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specific regulation would result in practical difficulty , or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the City Zoning Ordinance. B. That there are exceptional or extraordinary ' circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved which do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. C. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileqes enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. ' D. That the granting of the Variance as conditioned will � not constitute the granting of a special privilege inconsistent - with the limitations on other properties in the same zone. E. That the granting of the Variance will not be , detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. F. That the granting of the Variance will not adversely , affect the orderly development of the City. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and the, determinations, hereby approves Variance Case No. 20, subject to , the following conditions: ' f:\resolutn\reso2478 � 1 .� • ! � �� "� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable ; regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Buiiding Code and the Uniform Fire Code. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon, shall be first reported to Director of ' the Community Development for review and approval. 3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. 4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to all conditions of this approval prior to issuance of any building permits. PLANNING DIVISION 5. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood main office) to establish the location of a mail box serving the proposed development. 6. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer shall remit all necessary fees, pursuant to Government Code Section 53080. ; 7. A minimum fourteen (14) standard parking spaces shall be provided for the proposed development. 8. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved. � 9. The applicant shall submit a revised site plan per conditions of this Resolution indicating all guest parking, employee parking, and landscaping to the Director of , Community Development for review and approval. T0. Construction shall commence within six (6) months from date of issuance of a building permit. DESIGN 11 Air conditioners, heating and ventilation equipment, swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical devices shall be located within the rear yard or street side yard or corner lot. Such equipment shall be screened from surrounding properties and streets and operated in accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance. ; 12. The owner of the site shall maintain a pro-aative approach to the elimination of qraffiti from the-struCtures, fences and any accessory building, on a daily basis. 13. A cover sheet of approved Conditions must be attached to plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety Division. 14. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in sanitary condition pending construction and shall be . maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure to comply may result in revocation of the approved Variance. f\planning\resolution\f:reso2478 � 2 : � �Xs • � � PUBLIC WORK/ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT � 15. Reconstruct damaqed sidewalk along Imperial Highway. 16. Reconstruct damaged and substandard drive approach(es) per � City standards. FIRE DEPARTMENT "NO Comments" Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1993, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: � � NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Elizabeth Dixon, Chairperson � APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director Kenneth Fong Community Development Director City Attorney f:�reso Wtn\reso2478 � � � 3 ��, - • ^ �M NU. Z ��'"�� DATE: July 13, 1993 �,�...^- !,�jl �� . � � �.:,';,.,'.:`. :'•��J. . TO: PLANNING COMMISSION ""�'" , FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director ' Community Development Department , SUBJECT: Variance Case No. 21 Applicant: Kidney Dialysis Care Unit, Inc. Pr000sal• - The applicant is requesting a Variance to reduce the required parking by eleven (11) spaces and to include compact spaces in order to partially fulfill the parking requirement of thirty-six (36) parking spaces at an existing building medical use at 3600- 3608 E. Martin Luther King Jr., Blvd., in the HMD (Hospital Medical Dental) zone. Facts 1. Source of Authoritv � While Section 25.1.41 of the Lynwood Municipal Code regulates parking in all commercial and industrial zones, Section 25'- 26 requires that a Variance be obtained from the Planning, Commission when, because of the special circumstances applicable to the property, the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. 2. Propertv Location and Size The site is located at the southwest corner of Martin Luther • King, Jr. Blvd and Norton Avenue. (Refer to the attached location map). The lot is irregular in shape and is� approximately 22,531 square feet in size. 3. Existina Land Use The site is developed with a commercial structure and is surrounded by the following land uses: North - Commercial � South - Commercial East - Commercial West - Multi-Family Residential 4. Land Use Description General Plan Zoning North - Commercial HMD South - Commercial HMD East - Commercial HMD West - Multi-Family R-3 5. Project Characteristics The property is currently developed with a commercial structure. The applicant is seeking to upgrade the parkinq� area by resurfacing and restriping the lot to increase the efficiency and circulation within the parking area. Current, parking requirements based on the use of the building would require thirty-six (36) parking spaces. The proposed, . Variance will reduce the required parking from thirty-six (36) parking spaces to twenty-five (25) parking spaces in the operation of the existing medical facility. The existing� commercial site given its irreqular shape is only capable of providing twenty-five (25) parking spaces, and is 1 � t � • • approximately 11,516 square feet in area. The applicant has stated that a majority of the patients are not capable of driving and are transported to and from the facility via a van contracted by the facility. This in turn' requires the need to provide a Med-Van loading zone areas at two locations on the site. (See site plan) - 6. Site Plan Review At its regular meeting of May 2'7, 1993, the Site Plan Review� , Committee reviewed and recommended approval of the variance request subject to the conditions established. , 7. Zoning Enforcement Historv None of record. 8. Neiahborhood Resbonse None of record at the time of preparation of the staff report. � ANALYSTS AND CONCLUSION l. Consistency with General__Plan The proposed land use is consistent with the existing Zoning classification HMD and the General Plan designation of Commercial. 2. Site Suitability The property as originally developed could accommodate the proposed addition. However, given current development, standards relative to parking, there is an inability to' provide the required parking on the site; therefore, requiring a Variance for the project. Alternately the applicant could be required to locate off-street parking on, another site within a(300) feet radius of the subject property. 3. Compatibility The existing medical use is compatible with other uses on neighboring properties. 4. Compliance with Development Standards Specific Findings: The property is a substandard lot with a hardship experienced that would require an exceptional privilege and meets the State requirements for findings of a Variance and as per• Section 25-26.7 and 25-26.9 of the Code of the City of Lynwood. Therefore, grantinq of this variance would not set a precedent in the City that would eventually result in' the increased density of this nature. Staff's determination of these findings is to recommend approval of the Planning Commission of the Variance request. 5. Environmental Assessment The Community Development Department Staff has determined' . that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to section 15061 b(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act of 1989 as amended. f:\var�var21 . 2 � � � 1 , RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission approval of the Variance request: A. Finding that a hardship has been established that would require a Variance for Case No. 21 as determined by Section 25-26 of the Code of the City of Lynwood. , B. Finding due to lot size and configuration, owner will be deprived of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same vicinity or zone. Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Resolution No. 2479 3. Site Plan f:var:var21 3 a..,.R- � —+---- . l �-- -- , 7 LOCATION iVIAP - daQ� /PG .( 0 /IQq[ � � ^ .. . �� AO� //lO�OV'� ��t'.1.1 . yo'! � a 5 ' � ACMA ' " 5 ' ��ar : 3b , r o 4 0 � • y �1 �;� ,�,ti r` ,.� " "�,�50� , o�k.. .t�az � "voe _ ' ,'� �\ � b 3 6 •� x �°' � '�" ,� a <� ,� : ' ;� ' � , � � z;a , r ' s�,vscw y � �••�u � � /e�+y,. —H.oa ��o '� ?J . ' '+�� 9 °� S b� �\ � �! � / uio . � ]O 7� 21 }7 S?6 �� ' / � 2// J ' ` - , wctcr � 57 y + � p � ZOierr � �io9 ' 0 , � a' eY1. , � �- R1 a a QO a QI � ,•osx� Tp, '� , 2 / 9 0 . 3s13 3S)7 3SY� 368 3tdt ,�5 3 ' f �` % Ta � �~� q � o �. . �n x�r ra ve��:r are o ': � o h � e� .... � � K'K � AVfN(/f' � � o � � so .a r A � �� .w Af.147i7N AVE Y � v o � � 25 r�. �r .v � . .} � e, I b 1 �� o- �pl J o �� B �� . y 1 p . � i w �g' q �y � /� r b\n � M b� �� J r � Q �� (�1 ('7 �, M I r' I M I q" t � ' 3 ` "� iC �• V � d 3 C !1 9 ' . ao .o m � eo �� ao n eo xen � ��,p�y- E b �. b� d � �g \ �I � c�� I�,, I � a i � g�� s �' ��' 4� �s" b �'�' �, ••+� 4 � . $ � I ro Mi M cn I �o� � a j a� � �� ; c,/33��i i, va �<� � N � � m o s � sc w ro � ee � � �� J z �' . y t 4� ', : :�. � st � �S� / Z �2 s>: Q o ls�� /1 � - o TR S / � N � � rr�r o`` 9� ��ly N1 ��'� � ''- � 1 ,�� , , 6 � . . � � C s � 0 1 d � � �'�� - � � �� '�� s . . � �� s . .� • A�... 4� Q! � �..: f i 'Y F } . �: . $ ��e� , , ,. � . '� ..:�ti': . .''� � � . .�:' �;:� _ .., 1 • " . , * CASE N0. �� 2� ; �.,�:��_�_.....� ._ _ _ _ , ,� � � ., , , RESOLUTION NO. 2479 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMZSSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A VARIANCE REQUEST (CASE NO. 21) TO REDUCE REQUIRED PARKING FROM THIRTY (36) SPACES TO TWENTY- SIX (26) SPACES -IN THE OPERATION OF AN EXISTING MEDICAL FACILITY IN THE HMD (HOSPITAL MEDICAL DENTAL) ZONE, AT 3600-3608 E. MARTIN LUTHER KZNG BOULEVARD, LYNWQOD CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, pursuant to law, held a public hearing on subject application; and WHEREAS, the Commission has carefully considered all ' pertinent testimony offered at the public,hearinq; and WHEREAS, the project is consistent with the intent of the General Plan in that.the subject site is classified as a commercial zone; WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined' that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061b(3), as amended. Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood' finds and concludes as follows: A. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of Section 25-4.12 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this chapter. � B. There are special circumstances applicable to the property in that the building/structure is an existing warehouse and it was originally developed to comply with prior, not current, parking regulations. : C. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of Section 25-4.12 would deprive the applicant of, privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties - which have maintained parking on-site. A. That granting of the variance as conditioned will not constitute the granting of a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity classified in the same zone. E, That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental; to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. F. That the granting of the variance will not adversely, affect the orderly development of the City. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, . based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby approves Variance Request Case No. 21 provided the following conditions are observed and complied with at all times. � f:resolutn:reso2479 . . 1 '�, � w r COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building Code, and the Fire Code. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, for review. 3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. 4. The applicant or his representative, shall sign a Statement of Acceptance within fifteen (15) days from the date of, receipt of this Resolution by the Planning Commission. Signing this statement implies that applicant or his representative has read, understands and agrees to the conditions of this Resolution. PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING CONDITIONS 5. Submit a drainage plan. Drainage plan will be checked by Department of Public Works. No permits will be issued prior to the approval of drainage plan. 6. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter and required pavement alonq Norton Avenue. 7. Reconstruct cross gutter and required AC pavement at alley along Norton Avenue. 8. Close existing drive approach along Norton Avenue. 9. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all off-site improvements. FIRE DEPARTMENT "NO COMMENTS'� Section 3. A copy of Resolution No. 2479 shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of July 1993, by members of Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Elizabeth Dixon, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: . Sol Blumenfeld, Director Kenneth Fong Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney f:resolutn:reso2479 � z � '�� . DATE: July 13,�993 �u�� ITEM Nd . / 4 ` CASE N0. �- __ TO: PLANNING COMMISSION �[ � FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director G�., Community Development Depa�ftment SUBJECT: Variance Case No. 23 Applicant: Eliu Saucedo Proposal• . The applicant is requesting a Variance to increase the height of a proposed fence from 3'-6" to 7' in order to maintain an auto repair at 2991 Imperial Highway, in the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone, Lynwood, California. Facts 1. Source of Authoritv. , _. Section 25-26 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that a Variance be obtained from the Planning Commission because of special circumstances applicable to the property, and when strict application of the Zoning Ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the' vicinity and under identical zoning classification. 2. Propertv Location and Size The site is located between State Street and Bellinger Street on Imperial Highway, and is a rectangular shaped parcel of� , approximately 15,000 square feet. 3'. Existing Land Use The subject site is surrounded by the following land uses: North - Multi-Family Residential South - Institutional/Commercial East - Institutional/Commercial West - Multi-Family Residential/Commercial 4. Land Use Description - General Plan Zoning North - Multi- Family Residential R-3 South - Commercial C-2 East - Commercial C-2 West - Commercial C-2 5. Proiect Characteristics The property is currently developed with an auto repair shop, tire shop and body and fender shop. The property is not in conformance with the auto sales/auto repair ordinance and ' regulations. The owner is seeking to bring the subject property into greater code compliance by providing required on-site parking and landscaping. The site will be landscaped in conjunction with the proposed fence. All existing uses, will remain. The current auto repair/auto sales ordinance does not address existing non-conforming uses which generally , require special screening measures to screen the use from public view. , f:\staffrpt\var23 ' , 1 l . 6. Site Plan Revi� • ;t;- At its regular meeting of July 1, 1993, the Site Plan Review Committee reviewed and recommended approval of the Variance request. � 7. Zonina Enforcement Historv 1985 - Auto Body Repair with spray booth approved. 1992 - Cited by Code Enforcement for operating businesses without a business license. Also was ticketed for junk, trash and debris on property. , 8. Neiahborhood Response None of record at the time of preparation of the staff report. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION 1. Consistencv with General Plan The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning classification C-2 and the General Plan designation of Commercial. 2. Site Suitabilitv The site is suitable in size to accommodate required parking and the existing uses. 3. ComAatibility The proposed fence of 7' is generally compatible with other fence height on commercial uses on neighboring properties, though the proposed fence will not conform to the existing commercial fence height standards. However, special screening considerations exist for the existing auto-related use which . should be considered in connection with compatibility issues ' for the proposed Variance request. 4. Compliance with Development Standards Findings: The property will be brought into conformance with parking and landscape requirements which are proposed by the applicant. However, pursuant to Section 25-16.6(e)3(b), fence height is limited to 36 inches maximum for parcels less than 50,000 square feet and when located on a corner parcel within five feet of a street intersection. The proposed fence height of 7'-0 will reduce motorist visibility on adjacent intersections. Thus it will be necessary to provide a 45 degree corner cut and to reduce fence height accordingly within the corner cut to permit visibility with the proposed fence height. (Please see, attached plan) The property has legal non-conforming uses on the lot which require special screening from public view. The auto sales • and auto repair ordinance for new development corrects the screening conditions required for auto repair and auto sales activities, but does not address the issue of screening for existing uses. Thus qranting of this Variance would not set a precedent in . the City as the increased fence height would only apply to the subject existing non-conforming uses. f:�staffrpt\var23 2 r • 5. Environmental �sessment • i The Community Development Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15061 b(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality, Act of 1989 as amended. RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission approve the Variance request. A. Finding that a hardship has been established that would require a Variance for Case No. 23 as determined by Section 25-26 of the City of Lynwood Zoning Code. B. Finding that granting of the Variance as conditioned will not constitute the granting of a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the same zone. C. Finding that granting of the Variance will not adversely affect the orderly development of the City. D. Finding that there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved which do not apply generally to other. properties in the same zone. Attachments � 1. Location Map 2. Resolution No. 2485 3. Plot Plan f:\staffrpt\var23 � 3 . i' ��. • RESOLUTION NO. 2485 . A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A VARIANCE REQUEST (CASE NO. 23) TO INCREASE THE REQUIRED FENCE HEIGHT FROM. THREE FEET-SIX INCHES (3'-6") TO SEVEN (7) FEET AT 2991 E. IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, IN THE C-3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, pursuant to law, held a public hearing on the subject . application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the project is consistent with Che intent of the General Plan in that the subject site is classified C-3 (Heavy Commercial). WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from provisions of the State CEQA , Guidelines, Section 15061b (3), as amended. Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specific regulation would result in practical difficulty ' or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the City Zoning Ordinance. B. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved which do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. , ' C. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. D. That the granting of the Variance as conditioned will not constitute the granting of a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the same zone. E. That the granting of the Variance will not be , detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the. , vicinity. F. That the qranting of the Variance will not adversely affect the orderly development of the City. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and the determinations, hereby approves Variance Case No. 23, subject to the following conditions: f:\resolutn\reso2485 �� _ 1 . i C�NITY DEVELOPMENT DEPART� �� 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable ' requlations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or � structures thereon, shall be first reported to Director.of � the Community Development for review and approval. 3. The applicant shall prepare a revised plot plan with corner " , cut, signing and landscaping shown for review and approval by the Director of Community Development and meet the requirements of all other City Departments. 4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to all conditions of this approval prior to issuance of any building permits. PLANNING DIVISION 5. The owner of the site shall maintain a pro-active approach to the elimination of qraffiti from the structures, fences� and any accessory building, on a daily basis. - 6. A cover sheet of Approved Conditions must be attached Co plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety Division. 7. The existinq property shall be cleaned and maintained in , sanitary condition pending construction and shall be ; maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure to comply may result in revocation of the approved Variance. PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 8. Dedicate 10' cut o£f corner oE property at the northwest ' corner if Imperial Highway and State Street to accommodate a radius. , f:\resolutn\reso2485 � 2 I 1 -� � � Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1993, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Elizabeth Dixon, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director Kenneth Fong Community Development Director City Attorney f:\resolutn\reso2485 3 �', " , _ i ; � _,DATE: July 13,�93 • ' ' � ---^- � �;: t y , i; � p T0: PLANNING COMMISSION '' `'" �' ' ' - � G�!- _,. L FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director�� Community Development Deparfinent SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 128 Applicant: Frank Darmiento � Proposal: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit in ordez to refurbish an existing residential motel for conversion to a 16 unit residential motel at 12028 Long Beach Boulevard in the C-2A (Medium Commercial) zone. Facts• l. Source of Authoritv Section 25.4.a of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires a Conditional Use Permit in order to refurbish an existing, residential motel for conversion to 16 unit residential units. Municipal Code further stipulates that the Planning Commission determine whether a use not specifically listed as a permitted use or a conditional use in any one or more zones on the basis of similarity to uses specifically listed, notwithstanding the amendment procedures for adding new uses to the list of permitted or conditional uses. 2. Propertv Location The site is located on the east side of Long Beach Boulevard, ' between Cedar Avenue and Agnes Street. (Please see attached' location map.) 3. Propertv Size � The subject site consists of a lot which is rectangularly shaped, and approximately 9,800 square feet. 4. Existina Land Use The property is currently occupied by an obsolete and dilapidated motel use. The surrounding land uses are as follows: North - Commercial South - Commercial East - Single-Family Residential West - Commercial 5. Land Use Description The General Plan Designation for the subject property is ' Medium Commercial while the Zoning Classification is C-2A.• The surrounding land use designations are as follows: General Plan: Zonina: North - Commercial North - C-2A � South - Commercial South - C-2A East - Single Family Residential East - R-1 West - Commercial West - C-2A f:\staffrpt\cup128 � 1 `, ,6. Pro�ect Charac�istics: • The applicant proposes to renovate an existing two-story motel for conversion to a 16 unit residential motel use with ; 16 existing paxking spaces. The project will contain three ' (3) unit types: Type "A" 540 square feet, Type "B" 540 square feet, Type "C" 320 square feet and include a kitchen and � nook, bath and bedroom. The existing building facade has been redesigned to provide a fitting element for the adjacent commercial area. 7. Site Plan Review At a special meeting on May 5, 1993, the Site Plan Revieca Committee evaluated the proposed development and recommended approval to the Planning Commission subject to the conditions and requiremen�s stated in the attached Resolution. 8. Zoning Enforcement HistorV None of record at the time this report was completed. 9. Public Response None of record at the time this report caas prepared by Staff. However, it has been reported that the subject site must be, cleaned by the property owner. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: 1. Consistency with General Plan The proposed use will substantially upgrade and enhance an existing blighted use which has been vacant for over two years. Staff has worked with the applicant in connection with proposed facade and site improvements on the' refurbishment of the existing use. The proposed renovation' will add a breakfast nook in the kitchen area and provide� substantial amounts of landscaping, new wrought iron fence/gate detail and a new building facade incorporating "plant-on" framing details and divide lite windows and awning, treatment. The proposed project has been designated as a Community ; Development Block Grant (CDBG) rental rehabilitation project for Fiscal Years 1988 through 1990. Under the program, the owner may qualify for up to a maximum of $25,000 for rental rehabilitation assistance pursuant to certain terms and conditions. The City's contribution will cause the property to be made available at lease terms which are below 80% of the Los Angeles County median income level. (Please see attached program regulations) The owner will be required to hire a capable resident manager to manage the operation of the proposed project. On March 30, 1993 at the regularly scheduled meeting of the Lynwood City Council, the proposed project was designated a rental rehabilitation project. A residential motel is not specifically listed as a permitted; or conditional use in any zone. Section 25-24.1 of the Municipal Code stipulates that the Planning Commission upon its own initiative or upon written request, shall determine whether a use not specifically listed as a permitted or conditional use in any zone shall be' deemed a permitted use or a conditional use in any one or more zones on the basis of similarity to uses specifically listed. . . f:\staffrpt\cup128 , 2 . , � Motels and hot are a conditional use•n the C-2A zone. ' Multiple dwellings are a conditional use in the R-2 and R-3 zones. An issue for the Planning Commission is whether the, proposed use is more similar to a motel or to an apartme�t building. Staff regards this use as more similar to a motel. Essentially the only difference is that the proposed is planned for longer term residency. The size of the units is more similar to that of motels, and thus the parking requirements for apartment buildings would be inappropriate. The site configuration and exterior loading is more similar to a motel. If the Planning Commission concurs with staff, residential motels would be considered a conditional usein, the C-2A zone. , Granting Conditional Use Permit No. 128 will not adversely . affect the General Plan. 2. Site Suitabilitv The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development relative to structures, walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. 3. CompatibilitV The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of� commercial developments and other residential motels in the' area. Therefore, the project will be compatible with the surrounding land uses. 4. Compliance with Development Standards The proposal meets the development standards required by the Zoning Ordinance with respect to setbacks; lot coverage and building height. The project exceeds the plan density for R-3 use, as it was originally constructed as a motel use. � 5. Conditions of Approval The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or ' welfare. 6. Benefits to CommunitV The proposal will assist in upgrading the residential use of the property and support the intent of the General Plan by upgrading an existing vacant property and enhancing the commercial corridor. 7. EnviYOnmental Assessment The Community Development Department Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15061 b(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality' Act of 1989 as amended. f:\staffrpt\cup128 3 RECOP�MENDATION: • � ' Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2480. 1. Certifying that project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by , Section 15061b(3). 2, Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 128, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan/Elevation Drawing/Floor Plans 3. Photo/Existing Building Condition 4. Resolution No. 2480 5. Rental Rehabilitation Regulations f:\staffrpt\cup128 ' 4 � � -- -- �-�r o� . -- ___ � , , `vl °' � — , ; e � s ^�S� � �- ' . b �.�-M1y—, _._._-- - �is, ' „ ° �' � � �i .' .r i �ro� r m g �o� i b N eos � �� ' �' � ' `/RC/N . � �cy ° '^ � ,�� ` I '6 k . �A �_ o �//Si �� e�o 8 `.. � t . ` � MS 19� u `� � // � i � 6 ° I � � � Y , p iao 0 o°at o � ��' ,� � �� o � g 'e° �ai �3a, � . �� il � 703 7l n /y7,�' ' � 'r] ^] 1� v � � J n V1� '� � 'y � l �0 A h �. �,�"�'1 �i r n v n a j�v �� . � � �c� n � �r � °= o M � M � � 1 i � � J C ' . e ° Jo 3 ° .r° .,b ,�l � � 7, s�'�" � � v � � ; � ! �i� � o Yi. � . � r �� i��+�.� M�� . � o , OZ� g 3 T o � .. I 69 �� i �O � x� �, � , Idoo� v�,�o � '°1� AC NES . I n ro � w �o/ � St � ° o Id o � � q �I. ��' � l� '� . " � . a o o . / ^��',�o" c �a i�e Y M o n� ,� , azs � 1 arr � i � v �� "�., . zl � � � /7�� i� J� v� t — �JI �.� . ic � � o n� IDa! m 826 'Mee � '� � �� y ��' � � f �� B/� M� ;�1. � 1 ' , < a ��' ` � , �aoaid "z �s�', ,y z�� -aa� .. - y a�io ? � �e✓ � ��/� ' g � � � 4� c 1 �.� ,�r�y �° ZoJ o °i°/doaS � �'� 1 h '. M o a ^�, -� �e°� ;izs � ,•n' S� „ '1° �Tal�o1 'ua �� ,o �� a` '� �r3 I . M � � : = iso , so � � � N / I � ' ao r� �726 a o � AYENU J.i;�,. o '� � c5 ,� 9 � ��`BI ii7, I � a . A o • a _� �♦ i � � ^�l � 1 � `° �� N � � �E�'4R �� n� �� a 4 a b ,: . � , � ; . o =� . � i _ h �� 0 7<i �7 e�r r i '�'"° � s „ , o ' ,� � ,� � R , � � P C� � '° I sc1 "' "' '�� `.�° �ie V �� j � a � � eJe � � e' '"' �2s ia7 i� ,� l`�'� � ,� l� ^ ^� � li�� /�ll Q9 /J I � � t O � � ' � .,� h� ^ � . � �xi 6 � �I�, , Col j- r��_N eio � b� � ��JS �, � � � '� �� „� ^ ��ia�a� I "� � r �� s°9� � a �i 2, .•^ o : � "�oo ��< <E r i . ioo� � � 2 F�� O ' r �� Q s�o� � .a�z �� .� �� .., � 5 a ,y t J I . � .^� 'S '�� o-a�� . h vm0A1� � � � b c„ ,rol'�P �BO��, ' _'�� y< � a�ia� y� ;3 'b \ JO /z�0 � �`h (h� � � " w ^°�'(� � bE� M 9 C M \`'�, �� , F„� ,� ' so 3�O m o s� �� a/ � 1 7� i n, ,oy� R ss o � y£NUE . 1 M � �,p �� l j' . I • l 3 ; . , ACNp�� .�o M �M ��`�w: �:. � I N� ' �9 �!C`l�N 9 b . .fOe .M°ie0 '��i»^ i i ��4 ro�o ��'� �� ro� o .. isc�l�� s � � `��' � 6-m Mor- ��' ro � ` d �� ch� �n b�+� �, a o�. ' 2 �.1, 2�� ._ I (h' N ii . �' 5 � ^� "' ^�� `^ \ � i r. .. � ir� 101 B'r � M ..W 1.�I.= c�� gi�� og y s�' esp � � � �l� � _.,..,vIS � � � � 1.o�1T I o N M��' Cl � ��• �� 128 � yp�, ._ - "`Y;t .' Y "� .e>ii�r"�� i � �'� ' � ' k.:. - i ; N i ��.� I� ,. b!0 ��: / i l !E�� .__ ' �'..../ i �� . �. � , � I � / / . i —�— 'I r' iF h7��' Existing Building Facade < .. .,, _: . _. ,. x _ ...x �t:;:: . . �� _ ,-;� , ,a � � � RESOLUTION NO. 2480 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYN6400D APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE P"ERMIT NO. 128 FOR THE REFURBISHMENT AND CONVERSION OF A MOTEL TO A MULTI-FAMILY DS9ELLING AT 12028 LONG BEACH BOULEVARD IN THE C-2A (COMMERCIAL) ZONE, LYN6400D, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREA5, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent , testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREA5, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exenpt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 b(3), as amended; and WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for development in the C-2A (Commercial) zone. Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and' determines as follows: A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and ' shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Official Zoning Ordinance. � B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values of , surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger , the public, health, safety, or welfare. C. The site will be developed pursuant to the site plan submitted and approved by the Site Plan Revieca Committee and Community Development Department. D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. ' E. The proposed development will add favorably to the housing stock and will provide additional affordable priced housing in concert with the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. , F. The proposed development will aid in aesthetically upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in , fostering other quality developments. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, . based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 128, provided the following conditions are observed and complied with at all times. ' f:\resoluen�reso2480 � 1 � � CONINNNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable• regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform, Building Code and the Fire Code and be' in substantial� compliance with plans on file with the Community Development Department. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, for review of said Conditional Use Permit. 3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. 4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read,: understands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance of any building permits. PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS 5. All work shall be performed by a licensed contractor as per plans, specifications and current codes. 6. The approval is for the refurbishment of an existing structure only: Any additions or changes to the existing� structure must first be reported to_the Director of Community Development. 7. The applicant Shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving the proposed development. 8. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one hundred and twenty (120) days after the use permitted has been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised. 9. Construction shall commence within (6) months from date' of issuance of building permits. 10. Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of ten (l00) percent of the lot area. � 11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance' with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. 12. The entire building and existing block separation wall shall be restuccoed and painted. The building, walls and fence/gate shall be painted to match. All proposed windows shall be divided lite and match in color and window lite size. All windows shall be white anodized painted aluminum., Building color, aluminum window color, and awning color are to be approved by the Director of Community Development. . 13. TYie owner shall provide the property address as shown on the approved plan/building elevation drawings with channel letters and shall submit shop drawings or other design drawings for review and approval by the Director of� Community Development. 14. The owner shall submit a detail and or shop drawings of the proposed fence/gate design for review and approval by the Director of Community Development. . i:\resolucn\reso2480 � ' Z � � 15. The owner shall provide a landscape plan for final review and approval by the Director of Community Development within 30 days of approval of this Conditional Use Permit. 16. The owner shall comply with all conditions and stipulations� of the City's rental rehabilitation program. 17. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped and sha11 consist predominately of plant materials except for necessary walks, drives and fences. Front yard shall consist of sod. 18. A minimum two (2) car garage shall be provided. 19. No side yard shall be less than three feet-six (3'-6"). 20. Final building elevations, including materials of construction, sh'all be submitted to and approved by the Building Official and the Community Development Director prior to issuance of any building permits. Final elevation , materials shall be subject to the approved plans. 21. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer shall pay $1.65 per square foot for residential buildings to the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government Code Section 53080. 22. Al1 driveway and parking areas shall be paved. 23. Acoustical construction materials shall be used throughout : the units to mitigate freeway noise to the standards and satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. 24. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the street dedications. 25. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design.of the exterior elevation of the building must be approved by the Director of Community Development or his/her designee. 26. All buildinq elevations shall be architecturally treated in a consistent manner, including the incorporation within the side and rear building elevations of same or all of the design elements used for the primary (front) facades. 27. That the applicant submit elevation drawings to the Planning , Division showing the exterior building design; including the specification of colors, and materials. 28. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally . compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent building. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc. shall be installed without the prior written approval of the • Director of Community Development. 29. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment, swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical devices shall be located within the rear yard or street. Such equipment shall be screened from surrounding properties and streets and so operated that they do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring residents, in accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance. 30. A cover sheet of approved conditions must be attached to plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety Division. 31. The owner of the site shall maintain a pro-active approach to the elimination of graffiti from the structures, fences and an accessory building, on a daily basis. f:AresoiutnAreso2480 � 3 , 32. For the pur�se of providing heatin•for any dwelling proposed, only an energy efficient forced air furnace shall: be used, and that the use of any wall furnace shall be expressly prohibited. PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 33. A three (3) foot dedication is required along Long Beach Boulevard. FIRE DEPARTP�ENT COMMENTS TO BE SUBMITTED ON 7/13/92 Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1993, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: s AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Elizabeth Dixon, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director Ken Fong Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney f : \resolutn\reso2480 � � A��n�� DATE: March 30. 1993 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Laurence Adams, City Manager ' BY: Scott Ehrlich, Housing Manager SUBJECT: Rental Rehabilitation Program (RPM) PURPOSE: � To obtain City Council approval to appropriate Fiscal Yeaz 1988 through 1990 Rental Rehabilitation Program (RPM) uncommitted funds into the fiscal year 1992-1993 budget and to commit these funds to the property located at 12028 Long Beach Blvd. OVERVIEW: On March 2, 1993, the City received a letter stating that we have approximately $75,000 remaining in rental rehabilitation from fiscal year 1988 through 1990. Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has given the Ciry until Mazch 31, 1993 to allocate this money to a specific project, othenvise the money is returned to the United States treasury. Staff has spent the past two weeks searching for a property that fits the criteria of this HUD Rental Rehabilitation Program. An apartment building located at 12028 Long Beach Blvd meets these criteria. This property has been the subject of many complainu at recent council meetings. The apartment building is an "REO" of Highland Federal Savings. The property is currendy vacant, fenced and boarded up. The property has 16 apartment units. DISCUSSION: ' The applicant, Mr. Frank Darmiento, is in the process of purchasing the property from Highland Federal Savings which should be completed by March 30, 1993. The total rehabilitation required to bring the property up to living standard is estimated at $14Q000. The new owner is proposing tha[ the City contribute $60,(10(1 and he will contribute $80,000. In addition, highland-Federal Savings and LoanTias agreed to lend him $37,000 upon completion of the rehabilitation. The City will have input as to how our money is spent, including the facade improvements. The Community Development Director has taken slides and is working on an acceptable facade improvement for the property. ' As a stipuladon of the City's contribution, the applicant has agaeed to hire a capable resident manager which should keep the property in good coa�on, both physicaliy and with regazd to the [enant mix: The Ciry's contribution will cause the property to be restricted to below 80% of inedian income. • As the site is accessible to transportation and shopping one suggestion may be to restrict tenancy to low income senior citizens. RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully requests that after consideradon, the City Council appropriate these funds and commit to the property located at 12028 Long Beach Blvd pursuant to provisions set forth in the Rental Rehabilitation Guidelines. l0� ITifl ,• • � } RENTAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM CITY OF LYNWOOD - PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The City of Lynwood will encourage and assist in the rehabilitation of residential rental units in Lynwood under the Rental Rehabilitation Program authorized by the U.S. Cotamunity Development and Urban-RUral Recovery Act of 1983. Grant and rental subsidy resources available from HUD will be used to increase the stock o! standard rental housing in the City and to assure the affordability of such housing to lower income families. The proqzam has been designed to maximize improvement assistance to substandard rental units which will house larger families and charge rents that very low-income households can afford. I. PROGRAM ACTIVITIES In FY 1991-1992 the City of Lynwood will ancourage and assiat in the rehabilitation of approximately 3 rental dwellinq units. The program will be pursued by the City's existinq staff responsible for the Residential Program (RRP). Rental projects in the targeted neighborhoods will be idantified for assistance consideration, usinq Housing Rehabilitation Specialists and Code Enforcement Officers. ; Projects evidancinq substandard conditions and pradominant occupancy by lower income tenants will be encouraged to apply for program assistance. Proposed projacts will be evaluated by the Loan Review Committee of the existinq Rehabilitation Proqram for satisfaction of program qoals. Approved projects will ba referred to Security Pacific Bank for loan processinq, for bot2i market rate private rehabilitation loans and the proqram loans. , Program loans will be in the form of ten-year, 0� interest deferred loans, forqiven in Pull at term, but payabla in full if prepaid prior to full term or at violntion of convarsion or, assisted tenant discrimination . Maximum assistance will be 50� of the per unit rehabilitation cost, to a maximum o! $5,000 per unit, for etticienciea, $6,500 for 1 bedroom unita, $7,500 for 2 bedroom units and $8,500 for 3 bedroom units. Program loans and attendant prohibitions will be secured by a lien on the subject property. Matchinq private investmant will be accompliahed where poesible by the underwriting of private property improvement loans by Security Pacific Sank. Affected lower income tenants not suitably housed in rahabilitated units will raceive tachnical and linancial relocation assistance lrom program funds. 1 _ � � _ . -- II. NEIGHBORHOOD SELECTION The Rental Rehabilitation Program will be operated in the RRP target neighborhoods. These neighborhoods are among the lowest income neighborhoods in the City. The City will be using Rental Rehabilitation qrants only to assist the rehabilitation of projects located in neighborhoods where the median incoma does not exceed 80 per cent of the median income for the area. , The City will select projects for rehabilitation that ara located in the neighborhoods in which: (A) The rents are qenerally affordable to lowar income lamilies at the time o! the selection of the neighborhood and (S) The of the neighborhood indicates that the rants are not likely to increase at a rata siqnificantly greater than the rate for rent increases that can reasonably be anticipated to occur in the market area for tha five - year period Eollowing the selection of the neighborhood. Selection of these neighborhoods_is based on 1988-91 Housing • Assistance Plan for the City of Lynwood. III. IAWER INCOME BENEFIT ' A minimum of 708 0! the rental rehabilitation qrant will be used to assist lower income families. One-hundred percent lower income benefit will be striven for, but achievinq that level is unlikely. No neighborhoods in Lynwood are so siqnificantly lower income, and no rental projects are so significantly substandard, that mora than 70t low income occupancy of a rantal projact would likely be encountared. I! 1003 lower income occupancy was necessary, signiticant numbers of non-lower income families would have to ba displaced by tha property owner/applicant. The City views this as an unaccaptabla circumstance. Given the characteriatics of the Lynwood neighborhoods and the displacement which would result, no practical program design exists which would achieve 100t low income benefit level. � IV. USE OF RENTAL REHABILITATION GRANTS FOR HOUSING FOR FAMILIES A minimum o! 70� of the units assisted under the proqram will be two-bedrooms or largar. All assistance given under the program will be approved by the City's Loan Review Committee, using as one.of their criteria !or project selection the qoal o! a minimum ot 70� total proqram asaistance to units oP two bedrooms or larqer. Priority will ba qiven to units with 3 or mora badrooms. 2 � � . � � V. USE OF RENTAL REHABILITATION GRANTS FOR UNITS IN SUBSTANDARD CONDITION TFiAT ARE OCCUPIED BY VERY LOW-INCOME FAMZLIES' Priority will be qiven to projects with substandard units occupied by vezy low-income families. All assistance given under the program will be approved by the City's Loan Review . Committee. One of their criteria Por project selection the priority to pro�ects with substandard units occupied by very low-income families. . VI. SELECTION OF PROPOSALS Proposals will be selected by tha Loan Review Committee: based on the following criteria: . a. Correction of substandard units, especially those, occupied by very low-income families. b, Predominanca of assistance to large lamilies in lower- incame catagorias, with a minimum o! 703 of all units assisted being two bedrooms. c. Maximum stimulation of private inveatment. d. Minimization of displacement of tenants. Tha Loan Review Committee will also evaluate the pro forma and loan processing information in order to select financially feasible projects with maximum pro- gram benefit. Operating income and replacement reserve levels will be considerad. The Loan Review Committee will consider the distribution of Section 8 existing vouchers to a project on the provision of financial ralocation asaistanca in thair avaluation of proqram' benefit. Relocation expenses paid to project unit; displacees will be deducted Prom the per unit maximum' assistance lavels. VII. FZNANCZAL FEASIBILITY The Rental Rehabilitation Program will be linancially feasible. Private funda will be available through private lendinq institu- tions, with lendinq servicas for both proqram deferred loans and private loans provided by Security Pacific Sank. VII2. NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION Neighborhood presarvation ia currently under way in the tarqeted ' neighborhoods, using Block Grant-funded hausing rehabilitation, Block Grant-funded, Capital Improvement Projects and social' service activiCies. Additional property imprcvements under the Rental Rehabilitation program will help enhance preservation. 3 t • • . , ._- IX. SCHEDULED FOR COMMZTTING RENTAL REHABILITATZON GRANT AMOUNTS Specific projects have not yet been selected Eor the program, but as the City runs an existing Block Grant-funded multi-family rehabilitation program, projects suitable Por this program are being identified. All staff and mechanisms for processinq and approving loans are in . Tha program anticipatas expending the allotted $30,OOO.by June 30, 1991. our'best local estimate is that the average cost per unft will be approximately $6,000. That means the proqram would rehabilitate 5 units in 12 months. X. NEED FOR RENTAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE • Not applicable. XI. NON-DZSCRIMINATION AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY The City of Lynwood will comply with aftirmative fair housing markating raquirements whan advertisinq the availability of rehabilitated units and vill aolicit applicationa trom parsons of all ethnic, racial and gender groups. � 1. Written material on Federal Fair Housing Laws will be dis- tributed to owners/tenants. All advertisements and/or public announcements regardinq the proqram will include the Equal Housinq Opportunity logo. ' 2. Each owner asaisted through the Rental Rehabilitation Proqram will be required to market rehabilitated units in a manner to. affirmatively further fair housinq. 3. Efforts will be made to inform and solicit applications lrom those persons in the housing market area least likaly to apply Por the units. Owners will utilize various community: contacts to advertise unit availability. 4. The Housinq and Community Davelopment Division will geriodically review affirmative marketing efforts mada by ; owners to ensure compliance with Equal Housinq Opportunity provisions. Where an owner has Lailad to lollow atfirmative marketinq requirements, appropriata actions, available under program regulations and/or applicable lawe, will ba taken to enforce contormity. ' owners will be encouraged to comply with proviaions of affirma- tiva marketing of the units !or no lass than seven years aPter the completion date of rehabilitation o! all units in the projects. • 4 � � � . XIZ. PUBLIC HOUSZNG AUTFIQRITY PARTICIPATION The Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles will apply to HuD for Section 8 Existing vouchers to provide for the City�s Rental Rehabilitation Program. A memorandum oP IInderstanding will be executed prior to the execution of an annual contribu- tions contract. The Section 8 Existinq Rental Rehabilitation Proqram contact person is: Marie Quon, Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles, California 90022, at (213) 260-2716. The necessary certifications are attached. , 5 I 4 i t �� ;� � � ;�� r�,,�� M ivU; _ � , ;�. - - � �� 1 � DATE: July 13, 1992 �;��,� Fii-�,_I/� T0: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 129 Applicant: Wilbur Owens PROPOSAL• ' The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop a single family dwelling at 11733 First Avenue in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. � FACTS: 1. Source of Authoritv Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained for any residential development in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. ' 2. Property Location: The site is located on the east side of First Avenue between Josephine Streets and I-105 Century Freeway (Refer to the attached location map). 3. Property size: � The subject site consists of a rectangular shaped lot approximately 5,112 square feet in size (50' x 116.5), with 15 foot radius cut at its north property line due to a required cul-de-sac. r 4. Existina Land Use: The property is currently vacant. The surrounding land uses are as follows: North - I-105 Century Freeway South - Vacant East - Vacant West - Single Family Residential 5. Land Use Designation: The General Plan Designation for the subject property is Town House & Cluster Housing while the Zoning Classification, is R-2. The surrounding land use designations are as� follows: General Plan Zoning North - Town House & ClusteY Housing North - R-2 South - Single Family Residential South - R-1 East - Single Family Residential East - CB-1 ; West - Town I-Iouse & ClusteT Housing West - R-2 � f:\staffrpt\cup129 . � 1 .�: , � � �� 6. Proiect Characteristics: The applicant proposes to develop a two (2) story single- � family residential dwelling with living areas on the second floor, and a three (3) car garage and storage area on the first floor. The proposal is developed to address the flood' zone regulations of the City. The flood plain level in the. area is approximately Five (5) feet and pursuant to public works requirements the living area must one (1) foot above' , the established flood plain level. Although it is required that the living area be above the flood area, staff had concerns over the proposed first floor storage area and its facilitation to be converted to a second unit due to its size (840 sq. ft.), the ceiling height of seven foot six' inches (only six feet is required), a finished concrete slab, and the inclusion of numerous doors and windows that appear to be strategically placed throughout the storage area. Staff suggested that some of the windows be decorative as storage areas typically do not contain many windows. Staff conditioned that no utilities be allowed in the , proposed storage area such as gas, water and plumbing except that electricity be allowed and restricted to one light outlet with two 2-way switches at each door entry to the , storage and the inclusion of four receptacle outlets, one per wall. In addition no interior partitions will be allowed within the storage. • The second floor includes three (3) bedrooms, two (2) full baths, a dining/kitchen area, a living room and a second story deck. Washer and dryer facilities will also be' provided at the second floor. Approximately twenty-five (25a) percent of the site is designated for landscaping. The elevations will consist of stucco and wood siding at the front elevation and as required will have either a concrete or clay tile roof. 7. Site Plan Review: At a speciaT meeting on July 1, 1993, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and recommended approval to the Planning Commission subject to specific, conditions and requirements. 8. Zoning Enforcement History_ None of record. 9. public Response: ' None of record at the time 'this report was prepared. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: 1. Consistency with General Plan The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning classification (R-2) and the General Plan designation Town House and Cluster Housing. Therefore, grantinq Conditional Use Permit No. 129, will not adversely affect the General Plan. 2. Site Suitabilitv The subject property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development relative to the proposed density; bulk of the structures; parking; walls, fences; driveways, and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, the subject property is adequately served with the required public utilities and offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility. 3. Compatibilitv z � �. � � . The proposed project will be located in a neighborhood that is substantially transitioned from single-family to two- family residences. Located to the north is the 105 Century Freeway. Properties located to the south, east, and west are developed as single family residential respectively. 4. Conditions of Aoproval The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. 5: Conditions of Approval The improvements proposed, subject to conditions recommended� by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or � welfare. 6. Benefits to Communitv The proposed development will aid to upgrade the neighborhood and will act as a catalyst to foster other quality developments. Moreover, the development will add favorably to the City's housing stock in furtherance of the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. � 7. Environmental Assessment The Community Development Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15061 b(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act of 1989 as amended. ' RECOMMENDATION• Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopts the attached Resolution No. 2482: 1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt' from the provision of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3) 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 129 subject to the stated conditions and requirements. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No.2482 2. Site Plan � f:\staffrpt\cupi29 3 � � � � . ; RESOLUTION NO. 2482 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 129 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A • SINGLE FAMILY AT 11733 FIRST AVENUE IN THE R- 2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. , WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law,' conducted a.public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent, testimony offered at the public hearing; and ! WHEREAS, the Community Development DiYector has determined� that the proposal is exempt from the provisions'of the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 b(3), as amended; and , WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for development in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping, driveways and other development features, required by the Official Zoning Ordinance. B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public, health, safety, or welfare. C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current, zoninq regulations and site plan submitted and approved, by the Site Plan Review Committee. D. The qranting of the Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. E. The proposed development will add favorably to the housing stock and will provide additional affordable priced housing in concert with the policies of the Housinq Element of the General Plan. : F. The proposed development will aid in aesthetically upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in fostering other quality developments. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 129, provided the following conditions are observed and complied with at all times.' f : \reso l utn\ reso2482 � 1 j � • 1 COMMiTNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable requlations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building Code and the Fire Code and be in substantial compliance with plans on file with the Community Development Department. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, for review of said Conditional Use Permit. 3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City- Departments. . 4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a' Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance of any building permits. PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS ' 5. All work shall be performed by a licensed contractor as per plans, specifications and current codes. , 6. The approval is for the development of one (1) unit onl which shall be located entirely on the second floor. The , first floor shall consist of a three-car garage and approximately 840 sq. ft, of storage, The storage area shall at no time be used as habitable space. No interior partitions shall be allowed within the storage area and such storage area shall not be serviced by any utilities, i.e. gas, and water and plumbing, except that two (2) 2-way switches for one liqht outlet and four (4) receptacles, one per wall only will be permitted. Washer & dryer facilities, shall be located on second floor. 7. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving the proposed development. S. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one hundred and twenty (120) days after the use permitted has been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised. ' 9. Construction shaZl commence within (6) months from date I of issuance of building permits. 10. Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25%); percent of the lot area. - � i 11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance � with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs , combined with ground cover as follows: One (1) five (5) gallon shrub for each 100 square feet of landscaped area;' and two (2) fifteen gallon trees for each 500 square feet of landscaped areas. 12. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped' � and shall consist predominately of plant materials except for necessary walks, drives and fences. Front yard shall consist of sod. . 13. A minimum two (2 car garaqe shall be provided. 2 a �_ . • 14. A six (6') foot high block wall shaZl be installed along the , perimeter of the property, except within the twenty (20') ' foot front yard setback. In this frontage, if built, the wall shall not exceed a height of four (4') feet measured from top of curb. 15. No side yard shall be less than five (5�) feet. , 16. Final building elevations, including materials of construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the Building Official and the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. Final elevation materials shall be subject to the approved plans which shall include the wood siding as shown on plans. 17. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer shall pay $1.65 per square foot for residential buildings to ' the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government' Code Section 53080. 18. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved. 19. Acoustical construction materials shall be used throughout' the units to mitigate freeway noise to the standards and satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. 20. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective material of either concrete title or clay tile only. 21. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar material other than the reflective qlossy, polished and/or rolled-formed type metal siding. 22. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the street dedications. 23. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the exterior elevation of the building must be approved by the Director of Community Development or his/her designee. 24. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in . a consistent manner, including the incorporation within the side and rear building elevations of same or all of the, design elements used for the primary (front) facades. 25. That the applicant submit elevation drawings to the Planning Division showing the exterior building design; including the specification of colors, and materials. 26. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally compatible with the design of the . subject and adjacent buildinq. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc. shall be installed without the prior written approval of the Director of Community Development. 27. Air conditioners, heating,. cooling ventilation equipment, swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical devices shall be located within the rear yard or street. Such equipment shall be screened from surrounding properties and streets and so operated that they do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring residents, in' accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance. . 28. A cover sheet of approved conditions must be attached to plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety Division. 29. The owner of the site shall maintain a pro-active approach to the elimination of graffiti from the structures, fences and an accessory building, on a daily basis. 3 � ., � � , 30. For the purpose of providing heating for any dwelling proposed, only an energy efficient forced air furnace shall be used, and that the use of any wall furnace shall be expressly prohibited. PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 31. Provide documentation that lots composing the property were legally separated to the satisfaction of the Department of Public works. After reviewing the documents, the Department of Public Works may require the submission and recordation of a parcel map or lot merger. , 32. Dedicate a sufficient strip of property along First Avenue to accommodate cul-de-sac. 33. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered Civil Engineer. Property is located within l00 year flood� level zone per flood boundary map. Also conform to all applicable codes per section 12 1/2 of Lynwood Municipal. Code. Livable space should be one foot higher than flood elevation. 34. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk, curb and 24" wide gutter and , required Asphalt Concrete pavement along First Avenue. 35. Construct a new drive approach per City standards at First � Avenue. 36. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected separately. Construct laterals as necessary. 37. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass. 38. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all off-site improvements. 39. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire, protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any work. 40. Submit a cul-de-sac improvement plan prepared and signed by, ' a registered civil engineer. Cul-de-sac design will be, checked by Public Works Department. No building permits will be issued prior to the approval of eul-de-sac plan by City engineer. 41. Remove and clean dirt from First Avenue. 42. Developer to vacate unused and unimproved alley west of property. Developer to obtain alley title report and pay vacation fees., FIRE DEPARTMENT NO COMMENTS f:\resoWtn\reso2482 � . . 4 , .: � � �a� Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered ' to the applicant. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1993, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: . Elizabeth Dixon, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director Ken Fong ' Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney f:\resolutn\reso2482 � 5 � � AGE�'DA ITEM N0. � �� DATE: July 13, 1992 Vll�i� IYO. Y�V TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director� Community Development Depa ment SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 130 Applicant: Wilbur Owens PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop a single family dwelling at 11727 First Avenue in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. FACTS•. 1. Source of Authoritv � Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that a I Conditional Use Permit be obtained for any residential development in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. 2. Propertv Location: I The site is located on the east side of First Avenue between, I Josephine Streets and I-105 Century Freeway (Refer to the attached location map). � 3. Prooertv size: I I The subject site consists of a rectangular shaped lot i approximately 5,112 square feet in size (50' x 126.5), with � 15 foot radius cut at its north property line. � I 4. Existing Land Use: I The property is currently vacant. The surrounding land uses I are as follows: i North - i-105 Century Freeway � South - Vacant � East - Vacant i West - Single Family Residential I 5. Land Use Designation• i � The General Plan Designation for the subject property is � Town House & Cluster Housing while the Zoning Classification � is R-2. The surrounding land use designations are as i follows: General Plan Zoning I North - Town House & Cluster Housing North - R-2 � South - Single Family Residential South - R-1 East - Single Family Residential East - CB-1 � West - Town House & Cluster Housing West - R-2 I I , I I � f:\staffrpt�cup130 I 1 � I I f � � �} • • 1 6. Project Characteristics: ' The applicant proposes to develop a two (2) story residential dwelling with living areas on the second floor, and a two (2) car garage and store area on the first floor. The proposal is developed to address the flood zone' regulations of the City. The second floor includes three (3) bedrooms, two (2) full baths, a dining/kitchen area, a living room and a second story deck. Approximately twenty- five (25�) percent of the site is designated for landscaping. 7. Site Plan Review: At a special meeting on July 1, 1993, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and recommended approval to the Planning Commission subject to specific �, conditions and requirements. � � i 8. Zoning Enforcement Historv: I None of record. � 9. public Resnonse: � i • None of record at the time this report was prepared. ' ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: I i 1. Consistencv with General Plan � The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning ' classification (R-2) and the General Plan designation Town ' House and Cluster Housing. Therefore, granting Conditional' � Use Permit No. 131, will not adversely affect the General '. Plan. 2. Site Suitabilitv � The subject property is adequate in size and shape to � accommodate the proposed development relative to the proposed density; bulk of the structures; parking; walls, ( fences; driveways, and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, the subject property is adequately served with the required public utilities and � offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility. i 3. Comoatibility ! The proposed project will be located in a neighborhood that I is substantially transitioned from single-family to two-' � family residences. Located to the north�is the 105 Century, I Freeway. Properties located to the south, east, and west are developed as single family residential respectively. 4. Conditions of Aonroval � The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions I recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have i a negative effect on the values of the surrounding � properties or interfere with or endanger the public health,. � safety or welfare. � I i , f:�staffrpt\cup130 � � i 2 - I ,� � � �.3 .� 5. Conditions of Approval , , The improvements proposed, subject to conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. 6. Benefits to Communitv The proposed development will aid to upgrade the � neighborhood and will act as a catalyst to foster other quality developments. Moreover, the development will add favorably to the City's housing stock in furtherance of the I policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. i 7. Environmental Assessment � The Community Development Department Staff has determined � that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section � 15061 b(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality � Act of 1989 as amended. I RECOMMENDATION• i Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the � Planning Commission adopts the attached Resolution No. 2483; � 1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the provision of the State CEQA Guidelines as i amended by Section 15061 b(3) 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 130 subject � to the stated conditions and requirements. ' ATTACHMENTS I 1. Location Map i 2. Resolution No.2483 i 3. Site Plan i i I I i I � � i i � � � f:\staffrpt\cup130 _ � , " � � 3 I 1; '! • • � , RESOLUTION NO. 2483 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNZNG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 130 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY AT 11727 FIRST AVENUE IN THE R- 2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined �i that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA � Guidelines Section 15061 b(3), as amended; and i WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for j development in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. i Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and � shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, � landscaping, driveways and other development features I required by the Official Zoning Ordinance. I B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, � will not have a negative effect on the values of I surrounding properties or interfere with or endanqer the public, health, safety, or welfare. i i C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current � zoning regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the Site Plan Review Committee. � D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not ; adversely affect the General Plan. , E. The proposed development will add favorably to the I housing stock and will provide additional affordable I priced housing in concert with the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. ' I F. The proposed development will aid in aesthetically upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in � fostering other quality developments. � Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, ! based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby� i approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 130, provided the � following conditions are observed and complied with at all times. ' � I ( f:\ reso W tn\ reso2483 . i � I ,;. �-t � � T COMMi]NITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable - regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building Code and the Fire Code and be in substantial compliance with plans on file with the Community Development Department. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, for review of said Conditional Use Permit. 3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City '' Departments. � 4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a � Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution � prior to issuance of any building permits. � i PLANNZNG DIVZSION CONDITIONS � i 5. All shall be performed by a licensed contractor per plans, i specifications and current codes. 6. The approval is for the development of (1) one unit onlv I which sahll be located entirely on the second floor. The first floor shall consist of a two-car garage and � approximately 980 sq. ft. of storage. The storage area � shall at no times be used as habitable space. No interior partitions shall be allowed within the stirage area and such '' storage area shall not be serviced by any utilities, i.e: � gas, water and plumbing, except that two (2) 2-way switches ; for one light outlet and four (4) receptacles, one per wall ' shall be permitted. ' � 7. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post office (Lynwood main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving � the proposed development. 8. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one � hundred and twenty (120) days after the use permitted has been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised. I 9. Construction shall commence within (6) months from date of issuance of building permits. 10 Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25°s) percent of the lot area. ! � 11 Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance i with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. , The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs � combined with ground cover as follows: One (1) five (5j I gallon shrub for each 100 square feet of landscaped area; and two (2) fifteen gallon trees for each 500 square feet of , landscaped areas. i 12. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped ' and shall consist predominately of plant materials except for necessary walks, drives and fences. I 13. A minimum two (2) car garage shall be provided. ; ' i z I � I I i .; � � ��'� 14. A six (6') foot high block all shall be installed along the perimeter of the property, except within the twenty (20') foot front yard setback. In this frontage, if built, the wall shall not exceed a height of four (4') feet measured from top of curb. 15. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet. 16. Final building elevations, including materials of construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the Building Official and the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. 17. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer shall pay $1.65 per square foot for residential buildings to. I the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government Code Section 53080. • 18. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved. ' 19. Acoustical construction materials shall be used throughout � the units to mitigate freeway noise to the standards and i satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. ' 20. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective material � of either concrete title or clay tile. 21. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of ; brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar ' material other than the reflective glossy, polished and/or � rolled-formed type metal siding. � 22. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the street dedications. i 23. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the � exterior elevation of the building must be approved by the � Director of Community Development or his/her desiqnee. � 24. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in � a consistent manner, including the incorporation within the � I side and rear building elevations of same or all of the design elements used for the primary (front) facades. � 25. That the applicant submit elevation drawings to the Planning i Division showing the exterior building design; including the ; specification of colors, and materials. 26. All security fences, grills, etc, shall be architecturally compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent � building. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc. shall be installed without the prior written approval of the � Director of Community Development. I i 27. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment, swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical � devices shall be located within the rear yard or street. Such equipment shall be screened from surrounding properties � and streets and so operated that they do not disturb the I peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring residents, in , accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance. i f 27. A cover sheet of approved conditions must be attached to plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety � Division. I 29. The owner of the site shall maintain a pro-active approach I to the elimination of qraffiti from the structures, fences ' and an accessory building, on a daily basis. I 3 � I � f'� • • � 30. For the purpose of providing heating for any dwelling proposed, only an energy efficient forced air furnace shall be used, and that the use of any wall furnace shall be expressly prohibited. PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 31. Provide documentation that lots composing the property were legally separated to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. After reviewing the documents, the Department of Public Works may require the submission and recordation; of a parcel map or lot merger. 32. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered Civil Engineer. Property is located within 100 year flood level zone per flood boundary map. Also conform to all applicable codes per section 12 1/2 of Lynwood Municipal Code. Livable space should be one foot higher than flood elevation. 33. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk, curb & gutter and required I pavement along First Avenue. � 34. Construct a new drive approach per City standards at � Josephine Street. i 35. Construct two (2) wheelchair ramps at Northwest, Northeast , corner of First Avenue and Josephine Street. � 36. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected ' separately. Construct laterals as necessary. 37. Install three (3) 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood . I standards - two (2) trees along Josephine Street, one (1) tree along First Avenue. 38. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass. ' � i 39. Underground all utilities. 40. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all i off-site improvements. 41. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire i protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The . work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by � the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the � Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any ; work. 42. Reo en First Avenue. � p (Design and construct transition curves � and AC pavement to join Josephine Street smoothly.) i 43. Construct cross gutter along Josephine Street. i 44. Provide and install stop sign, stop bar and legend on First � Avenue. � 45. Readjust water valve to new street level. ' 46. Remove and clean dirt from First Avenue. � 47. Developer to vacate unused and unimproved alley West of property. Developer to obtain alley title report and pay I vacation fees. � FIRE DEPARTMENT � NO COMMENTS � I � � f:\resolutn\reso2483 : ��, , ( i 4 i ► i; � � 1 Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1993, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Elizabeth Dixon, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director Ken Fong l i Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney I � I i � I I I i , I � i ; � I i I i i i f:�resolutn\reso2G83 - , I i I I i � 5 i I I I ;�� r � � � nr•�.,, �T.-, �� ^ DATE: July 13, 1992 � •�+ 1��rl (V�, v, - TO: PLANNING, COMMISSION CASE N0 . �� - FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director� Community Development Dep tment SUB,7ECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 131 Applicant: Mr. Wilbur Owens PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop a single family dwelling at 11739 First Avenue in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. FACTS: 1. Source of Authoritv Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained for any residential development in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. 2. Property Location: The site is located on the east side of First Avenue between I Josephine Streets and the I-105 Century Freeway (Refer to � the attached location map). I 3. Prooertv size: , The subject site consists of a rectangular shaped lot j approximately 6,227 square feet in size (50' x 126.5), with ' 15 foot radius cut at its north property line. � 4. Existina Land Use: I The property is currently vacant. The surrounding land uses � I are as follows•. i North - I-105 Century Freeway � South - Single Family Residential � East - Vacant ( West - Single Family Residential � 5. Land Use Desiqnation: ' � i The General Plan Designation for the subject property is � Town House & Cluster Housing while the Zoning Classification � is R-2. The surrounding land use designations are as ! follows: . � General Plan Zoning North - Town House & Cluster Housing North - R-2 I South - Single Family Residential South - R-1 East - Commercial East - CB-1 ( West - Town House & Cluster Housing West - R-2 � i , i � I I . f:staffrpt/cup131 � I 1 � i � � � � � � t ; 6. Project Characteristics: ` The applicant proposes to develop a two (2) story residential dwelling with living areas on the second floor; and a two (2) car garage and store area on the first floor: The proposal is developed to address the flood zone regulations of the City. The second floor includes three (3) bedrooms, two (2) full baths, a dining/kitchen'area, a living room and a second story deck. Approximately twenty- five (25�) percent of the site is designated for landscaping. � 7. Site Plan Review: At a special meeting on July 1, 1993, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and recommended approval to the Planning Commission subject to specific conditions and requirements.' , 8. Zonina Enforcement History_ � None of record. � ' 9. Public Response: None of record at the time this report was prepared. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: i 1. Consistencv with General Plan � The proposed land use is a less intensive use then the existing zoninq classification, and is therefore, consistenb with the existing zoning classification (R-2) and the General Plan designation Town House and Cluster Housing., Therefore, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 131, will not . adversely affect the General Plan. � 2. Site Suitabilitv The subject property is adequate in size and shape to• ' accommodate the proposed development relative to the proposed density; bulk of the structures; parking; walls,• fences; driveways, and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, the subject property, is adequately served with the required public utilities and � offers adequate vehicular'and pedestrian accessibility. � 3. Compatibility ;. The proposed project will be located in a neighborhood that, is substantially transitioned from single-family to two-; family residences. Located to the north is the 105 Century Freeway. Properties located to the south, east, and west are developed as single family residential. 4. Conditions of Aoproval � The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions _ recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have. a negative effect on the values of the surrounding, properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. ' ; � - f�planning\staffrpt\f:cupi3l � . . . 2 ; . 5. Conditions o�Approval . ti The improvements proposed, subject to conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or . interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or . welfare. • 6. Benefits to Communitv The proposed development will aid in aesthetically upgrading the neighborhood and will act as a catalyst to foster other quality developments. Moreover, the development will add favorably to the City's housing stock in furtherance of the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. 7. Environmental Assessment The Community Development Department Staff has determined� that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15061 b(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act of 1989 as amended. • ; RECOMMENDATION: i i Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopts the attached Resolution No. 2484: 1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from trie provision of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3} - 2, Approving Conditional Use Permit Case No. 131 subject to the stated conditions and requirements. ' ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map , 2. Resolution No.2484 � 3. Site Plan ' 1 ; � I � , j i f:staffrpt/cup131 ' 3. � ; , -- _..._...__ .---- ----_......_ ...... __.......____.. ti LOCATION iVIAP "__ — _ _____ K �_ —_.. � �'�o � i w , i �'�' ur. „ � e i�3 „,i ioo i a � �W �p� roz u �ve �� [,�'�� p�io • I�bf • --a � ' - � � � � ' � ��.+�. 4� � � 4 I�t� � • • Y �� --'.. ' � r� � $ , �+ . 'o s' � u.i�3� �u a j' i. o • Ip�` . I. J(L 4� 1 ,� 101, 10 `^ ` 2 � N � d � r � � ��° � � IA7 �BB � � � ` 'Q�'n ... fi �`EqNy� ._�?\+y � e�� m�0.Y /M AI .:.�� ry�x �. . C/TY .. �. � �y R/Gy � � FE. . � i"� 10 WAY aa� � r • , . . cur�� so .n. � • . � � 0� �//7e7 �,* lZ w v>. �i.a �'sa�'. Avt- � , i _ , e. I o . "°�� . + �,FER, - �� nn �� ti � a ` � o..::i y P� �c � � j r Z%a � . �.: � � � . � a� . „ �, , � � y , ` jo/ � ' y Q „ • r . 2 n7us � iq � . 1� 31 � / 4! � 1741� T]O ] % D , //1/' r' '� Z _ I i . . � �� Z6 � /� Q j � r � .. 1 . �� ia � 2 3 �r . s� j ��;� � s7 ' � � . ,: j 1 - 7 � ' //7yu I7 � // 7 O � e � y > . fr � �b` ��33$ iii3o ii:s� ;ir�n i •(/ p �, 1 ao ?f � �. . - '` .,,' f. a� +.Y i� f,l p ' r r _ JOSEPHINE, srREEr „ � � 11e ;, , � u � . y f ' � 9, �.P � . %i�sr.� ; iss �u . �a"ieu� �_isi ; •:y �� '!H•6^� .: i�" r 0 qroo �.+, � r �// 3 � liz . i.sc r -r7s. /ilo• //i07 tii � p817. �n. • �lI . �Ir ��0 L � P : : bPn ia�a . -ya�. � vo , • . ; ;. -- -'•_ . iS :.. —_ _ — NR 7�t� ' i; :::;.:. AGNES AVE N �J 'ys p..� � r'� •_ ti ',. ;�"'„, „ � , 1�f3e� � �� W 1t A 77 A 1� fo !f � � N il il �° ' t . +°+c�u- . I�l W a 2 x Q t { IYYd` i . �a - � , ... ,� � ��IS�Ti� [J2�� -TI��' ��N� �� atr � Y ' 70"_ ' '_'S7"' ; 'W _" ; - j� -' "7l_�_ ' 'Pi'_' ° � P � .. �i... .. .. . • (70Dl� \ "' "If'i:' Ie -IS_" f-. - ' � . ' n_ . " _ . >.�r .,� . �.� ` ..c � . ,� , . iDoYd� Yt' �� II"' 1 ^Kdl 71 �• �y ��1D."° ,� �� A . —� . � M I � , /rIN 4 �{ ��'r � � Ir � ��r • � ,' LAVINIA qV�NUE . l,x�� • I al :e 'e � y �� Itr iuu s♦ d/N ?7 ' �� < ;' I, t� � f� ' n. .. �I . CASE N0. � �� / � : � � ti RESOLUTION N0. 2484 ' A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVZNG CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 131 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMZLY AT 11739 FIRST AVENUE IN THE R- 2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIALj ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS', the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 b(3), as amended; and WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for development in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Official Zoning Ordinance. B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding properties or'interfere with or endanger the public, health, safety, or welfare. C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current, zoning regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the Site Plan Review Committee. D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. , E. The proposed development will add favorably to the housing stock and will provide additional affordable priced housing in concert with the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. F. The proposed development will aid in aesthetically upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in fostering other quality developments. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby, approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 131, provided the following conditions are observed and complied with at all times. f:reso2484 1 I . � � � �� ' COMMUNZTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ! 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable, regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building Code and the Fire Code and be in substantial' compliance with plans on file with the Community Development'. Department. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or� , structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community, Development Department, Planning Division, for review of said Conditional Use Permit. ; ' 3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. ' - 4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a' Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance of any building permits. � PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS 5. All work shall be performed by a licensed contractor as per. plans, specifications and current codes. , 6. The approval is for the development of one (1) unit onlv� which shall be located entirely on the second. The first, • floor shall consist of a two-car garage and approximately 700 sq. ft. of storage. The storage area shall at no time. - be used as habitable space. No interior partitions shall be, permitted within the storage area and such storage area. shall not be serviced by any utilities, i.e. gas, and water. •, and plumbing, except that two (2) 2-way switches for one light outlet and four (4) receptacles, one per wall only will be permitted. � 7. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving'. the proposed development. 8. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one hundred and twenty (120) days after the use permitted has been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised. ' 9. Construction shall commence' within (6) months from date' of issuance of building permits. 10 Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25%); percent of the lot area. 11 Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance ` with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the' Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs combined with ground cover as follows: One (1) five (5); gallon shrub for each 100 square feet of landscaped area; and two (2) fifteen gallon trees for each 500 square feet ofj landscaped areas. 12. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped and shall consist predominately of plant materials except . for necessary walks, drives and fences. 13. A minimum two (2) car garage shall be provided. i 2 ' � � � � 14. A six (6') foot high block all shall be installed along the perimeter of the property, except within the twenty (20') foot front yard setback. In this frontage, if built, the wall shall not exceed a height of four (4') feet measured' from top of curb. 15. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet. 16. Final building elevations, including materials of construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the; Building official and the Planning Division prior to, issuance of any building permits. 17 Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer shall pay $1.65 per square foot for residential buildings to the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government; Code Section 53080. � 18. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved. 19. Acoustical construction materials shall be used throughout the units to mitigate freeway noise to the standards and satisfaction of the Building.and Safety Division. 20. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective material� of either concrete tile or clay tile. 21. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar material other than the reflective glossy, polished and/or; rolled-formed type metal siding. 22. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the street dedications. 23. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the' exterior elevation of the building must be approved by the. Director of Community Development or his/her designee. 24. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in a consistent manner, including the incorporation within the side and rear building elevations of same or all of the design elements used for the primary (front) facades. 25. That the applicant submit elevation drawings to the Planning Division showing the exterior buildinq design; including the specification of colors, and materials. '26. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally� . compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent building. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc.� shall be installed without the prior written approval of the. Director of Community Development. 27. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment,� swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanicaT; devices shall be located within the rear yard or side yards., Such equipment shall be screened from surrounding properties' and streets and operated so that they do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring residents, in accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance. - 28. A cover sheet of approved conditions must be attached to plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety; • Division. ! 29. The owner of the site shall maintain a pro-active approach to the elimination of graffiti from the structures, fences� and an accessory building, on a daily basis. 3 I � � � 1 30. For the purpose of providing heating for any dwelling� proposed, only an energy efficient forced air furnace shall be used, and that the use of any wall furnace shall be� expressly prohibited. ' PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT , 31. Provide documentation that lots composing the property were. legally separated to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. �After reviewing the documents, the Department� of Public Works may require the submission and recordation of a parcel map or lot merger. 32. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered: , Civil Engineer. Property is located within 100 year flood' level zone per flood boundary map. Also conform to all applicable codes per section 12 1/2 of Lynwood Municipal Code. Livable space should be one foot higher than flood elevation. 33. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk, curb & gutter and required pavement along First Avenue. � 34. Construct a new drive approach per City standards at Josephine Street. 35. Construct two (2) wheelchair ramps at Northwest, Northeast'; corner of First Avenue and Josephine Street. 36. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected separately. Construct laterals as necessary. 37. Install three (3) 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood standards - two (2) trees along Josephine Street, one (1) ' tree along First Avenue. , 38. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass. , 39. Underground all utilities. 40. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all� off-site improvements. : 41. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any work. 42. Reopen First Avenue. (Design and construct transition curves and AC pavement to join Josephine Street smoothly.) ' 43. Construct cross gutter along Josephine Street. 44. Provide and install stop sign, stop bar and legend on First - Avenue. 45. Readjust water valve to new street level. i ' � . � I a ir � � �i+ � � Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1993, by, members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: , i AYES: NOES: ABSENT: � ABSTAIN: • , Elizabeth Dixon, Chairperson , APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: � Sol Blumenfeld, Director Ken Fong Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney . ; i I i � F:reso2484 - � ;i 5 / / `f� DATE: July 1� 1993 � `"' ��v•� !, T0: PLANNING COMMISSION l;,`�S`_� IVO, �'[�. Nv_ I _...R..��,.,.,�,� FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director�� Community Development Depdrftment SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment - Case No. GPA 7 Applicant: H. Sean Dayani PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a General Plan Amendment (GPA 7) from Town House & Cluster Housing to a Commercial designation for an area, the subject property, in the vicinity of 12217 Atlantic Avenue, approximately, 75,000 square feet in size in order to consider future commercial development for the area on the west side of Atlantic Avenue, between Lavinia and Carlin Avenue, in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. FACTS: 1. Source of Authoritv Section 65358. (a) of the State Planning and Zoning Law . • states that "..if it deems it to be in the public interest, the legislative body may amend all or part of the adopted general plan." 2. Property Location: The area is located on the west side of Atlantic, between Lavinia Avenue and Carlin Avenue. (Refer to the attached location map) 3. Propertv size: The area consists of a rectangular shaped lot, approximately 75,000 square feet in size. 4. Existina Land Use: � The project, in the subject area, contains a vacant retail � structure. The surroundinq land uses are as follows: 'r rv_ North - Church/ Multi-Family Residential/Auto Repair , South - Commercial Retail East - Commercial Retail West - Vacant 5. Land Use Desianation: The General Plan Designation for the subject property is � Townhouse & Cluster Housing while the Zoning Classification is R-2. The surrounding land.use designations are as . follows: ;; � General Plan Zoning North - Commercial North - C-B1 South - Townhouse & Cluster Housing South - R-2 East - Comme�cial East - C-B1 � West - Townhouse & Cluster Housing West - R-2 y 1 � ��1 6. Pro'ect Chara ristics • � �':i � The subject properties under application are, approximately, 75,000 square feet in size. The applicant intends to operate (or allow an operator to operate) a portion of the property as a retail store, approximately, 7,854 square feet in size. The store will operate in its present condition;, subject to very minor improvements i.e. new paint, internal improvements, and relining the parking lot. Thirty one (31) parking spaces are required for the project. The applicant - proposes to provide 70 parking spaces for the retail store project. The retail store.will have normal business hours; operating six (6) days per week, and employ a maximum of ten (10) employees. The project.is required to have seven (7%). of the project site area landscaped. ' 7. Site Plan Review: On July 1, 1993, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and established conditions for the proposal and deemed it appropriate to recommended approval to the Planning Commission, subject to specific conditions and requirements established thereof. However, further evaluation by the Site Plan Review Committee and Staff led to a recommendation of denial (see below). 8. Zoninq EnfoYCement xistory: � None of record at'the time this report was prepared.° However, the vacant structure at 12217 Atlantic Avenue has continual problems eliminating graffiti. 9. Public Response: None_of record at the time this report was prepared. ' ' ISSUES AND ANALYSIS ' 1. Consistency with General Plan y The proposed land use is inconsistent with the existing zoning classification (R-2), and the GeneYal Plan designation, Town House and Cluster Housing. However,`the Site Plan Review Committee and the Planning Staff evaluated the proposal and determined that if a zone change were to be granted, a broader area should be considered in order tq encourage and afford the opportunity for commercial revitalization and development. Much of the Redevelopment Project Area is comprised of narrow lots which preclude the possibility for creative, larger scale development. ` The owner has not presented plans for a project and does not have plans to substantially upgrade the existinq use which is , vacant, and presents a blight to the community. The applicant indicates'that the proposed General Amendment will � enable him to move forward with locating a commercial tenant � on site However, it is not possible to ascertain whether I such a project will enhance the commercial corridor in a ', manner consistent with the goals and policies of the General � Plan. I � 2. Area Suitabilitv � The subject area is adequate in size and shape to carry out, I the intent of the Commercial designation of the General Plan, I and accommodate the proposed development relative to the i proposed density; bulk of the structures; parking; wallsy i fences; driveways, and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, the subject property is adequately served with the required public utilities and � offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility. � i 2 I � I ' � � �� 3. Com liance wi Develo ment Standards • �� The proposed General Plan Amendment would enable the propose� use-to be consistent with the General Plan and meet all the development standards required by the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed use is currently inconsistent with the adopted General Plan and zoning for the area. 4. Compatibility The proposed project will be located in an area of mixed land uses. Located to.the north is multifamily dwelling unit, a church, and auto repair shop. Properties located to the south and east are.commercial/retail uses. And, to the west are developed as single-family/multi-family residential respectively. 5. Conditions of Approval The General Plan Amendment and improvements proposed, subject to the conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. However, the proposed use will not materially improve the area. 6. Benefits to Communitv The proposed General Plan Amendment may enhance the � neighborhood and may act as a catalyst to foster other quality developments. However, the General Plan Amendment and proposed development would preclude residential development of the property anticipated in the City's General Plan and Redevelopment Planning. 7. Environmental Assessment The Community Development Department Director has determined that no substantial environment impact will result from the proposed General Plan Amendment; therefore, a Negative � Declaration has been filed in the Community Development Department and in the Office of the City Clerk ; RECOMMENDATION• Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission deny the application for General Plan Amendment No. 7. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan f\planning\staffrpt\f:gpa7 3 ;�; ;�s 4� fQ: �,`. �U.�.""__"__'......_ _ .... � U I (� ((3� I l�l I A I� I U I� I U Li U. U :_ U� n � 29 2B 27 ?6 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 � 17 � ry+ I6 ; w � a d J� lzc J ,� ��' 0 I � 0 � � Q' � Z : I o 2 3 ' 4 5 6 7 B 9 J es ` e' I I wa Fe. al;: wsix n �.. � •rry c� r.r t- � �.v x a � r� �Y�l.:./7� I +T ' AVE ytw 9 iT� :a�tet .oau n ��., NI�GI!' +ca lal M iM J[.:r .�/ : ATLANTIC r g � 9 I �� 1 z J; w� � � � � � � � . � o ' • - !o J6.9 � � i : �� 12� 13 la , 15 . : Q � ; J ao _g � o ! h • � �� U .OI � � �un 9JI /N • O�' I O � (�J C [ � � � t ¢ 2 : • �s� y � � ., iie _��_ i,.,�. /9) 'H Z +R COOKACRE J � Q �•� U � z i` � V p Y � .,, G � x � � � i S 'd �� . � ) ' >:',; ;�`i , ;1 '��.. .... � ��.�� 0 N � S d � /b�'S-� I' �n,�-�v .'n ,..;1/ PO �u G �� • •s , , rs m , Z ��' ,��` . IS i . .�,� _F�G m / e fl � �� r6 n. • y � • ��cl � ' �{ � a�`:,s � r ;t `, ��'M =p n ,n� D e � z s. --� �� 1� � �� : � � _ frl ' ��'.��`" �CIrY� ��' : ' . .i � � )!,t /�' ' � �' 'S)�<<� � ,r � — r' � ��' t I o, ' : c 7� Z _ _- \ , � y.. (/ v � ._ o� �, ' D I o - �e<ei � •R �1: � `��.ret � B ' fl' �� v �61C( S � �Z ��T' ' IIC � w ' v �li'I � ' , L S: � r s � ' � -- ial i �' �(.CICI ~ N 'E . 1 �C�t� w � ' ,�� y j'IICI �, w YIItI �� ' � n�ei 4 ; �: iG� . �aifl-a. � � iu?my�l' .n�� ' � �i � . . e, 1 .; dlNl�d , � 'pC�� i i �;,g - b��r� ; y --�-- � r._ '.es�i i C'Uo[i � .. . i .rn� \ ru. �k r 0� � »r- ' g/ --i;r � � . u. � �� r'i ,r , y ...,,• .. -- i y �-�r,-- D ,. ' � --r`-} :,i�- m 1 - / , C _- n 1;� �iz : . m �=. r�: II'//I 4 �� /' 1 �' .rlr I' q ,NI"12�d� --- .� ,,,., �.� / � i� , i� • �� ' ' ' �,�_ i ' � .i I i i� li �,' � h � I � 'II �' � i .. � .� ..,�i �r � _ � � . � , :t..r ,� � � - � ' " k L-- �� : � m-- p „ , tE : � T ' ' � _ '7i _' �_" iT _"T� � I I Ij I i i: � I � � � p� I � I � eb i 2 i�u ar.v sc u I �y � _ '�' '�d�, 1 '+ 8. 6 . 'e - - - - -----�r„--- �' �„ ..� u . : ,. . ' i� .. � :o �� C�i'S � t ,. . x II� i - ' -- 'nr' -- ' ^lr.ai = :inr � •. �{i.: O a t2 ,� � 2 n w I � I 0 Y "�ir : :• t e 9i 1: � `• � '/ '," - [1 � OI /1/I/ � AS/ �.� •� �[i p ' 3 �t/ - ^� � y« . • � ,•. ��Y� �� __ T ' It "IO. � � ,.- a ` ° _'tt:_ ' , '__'_(1- ` r oI� . N p � �' 7,.,. �`. --it._: --�t _' �lf ° " �_"°L� : :�nr[t' ' ' "if . ..s ..� n , "+_"� . d�/V�! NOIl`d�0� � �- . ; ? ,,,: . � _, , �, _ . . - `��'r , DATE: ' July �, 1993 i'1r�1�7� ��LIYI N I �j' v �.t:��..�..-.�,,.,,,� . TO: PLANNING COMMISSION �� NO. 2G I�Jv- �__ i' � FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director� • � Community Development DepSrtment ' SUBJECT: Zorie Change - Case No. ZC 7 Applicant: H. Sean Dayani ' 3 . PROPOSAL: � s,.' ', The applicant is requesting approval of a Zone Change (ZC 7) from' . R-2 (Two-Family Residential) to C-B1 (Planned Business) for an. area, the subject property, in the vicinity of 12217 Atlantic� - Avenue, approximately, 75,000 square feet in size in order td � consider future commercial development for the area on the west°. side of Atlantic Avenue, between Ladinia and Carlin Avenue, in' ' the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. ; FACTS: � '. 1.. Source of Authoritv Section 25-27.7, a. of the City Zoning Ordinance allows the: " property owner(s) to initiate a change in zoning boundaries' and classification. � : , 2. Pronertv Location: " � � The area is located on the west side of Atlantic, between: Lavinia Avenue and Carlin Avenue. (Refer to the attached^ location map) � 3. Proper� size• , `The area consists of a rectangular shaped lot, approximately 75,000 square feet in size. , { , 4. Existina Land Use• - � The project; in the subject area, contains a vacant retail; structure. The surrounding land uses are as follows: , � , ; North - Church/ Multi-Family Residential/AUto Repair � South - Commercial Retail ; East - Commercial Retail ! West - Vacant , �; 5: Land Use Desianation• - i The General Plan Designation for the subject property.is � Townhouse & Cluster Hous'ing while the Zoning Classification i " is R-2. The surrounding land use'designations are as � ,' follows: , General Plan Zoning � , North - Commercial North - C-B1 ' South - Townhouse & Cluster Housing South - R-2 � ' East - Commencial East - C-B1 • • West - Townhouse & Cluster Housing West - R-2 ! �. _ , � . ;. : . i 1 , i ;. . , � 6. Project Charaairistics . �, The subject properties under application is, approximately, 75,000 square feet in size. The applicant intends to operate (or allow an operator to operate) a portion of the property as a retail store, approximately, 7,854 square feet in size. The store will operate in its present condition;: subject to very minor improvements i.e. new paint, internal± improvements, and relining the parking lot. Thirty one (31), parking spaces are required for the project. The applicant proposes to provide 70 parking spaces for the retail store project. The retail store will have normal business hours,' operating six (6) days per week, and employ a maximum of ten (10) employees. The project is required to have seven (7%)� of the project site area landscaped. 7. Site Plan Review: � On July 1, 1993, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and established conditions for the; proposal and deemed it appropriate to recommended approval to the Planning Commission, subject to specific conditions, and requirements established thereof. However, further� evaluation by the Site Plan Review Committee and Staff (see' � below) led to a recommendation of denial. 8. Zonina Enforcement Historv: � None of record at the time this report was prepared. HoweveY, the vacant structure at 12217 Atlantic Avenue has continual problems eliminating graffiti. � 9. Public ResAOnse: None of record at the time this report was prepared. ; ISSUES AND ANALYSIS 1. Consistencv with General Plan , The proposed zone change is inconsistent with the existing; zoning classification (R-2), and the General Plan; designation, Town House and Cluster Housing. However, the Site Plan Review Committee and the Planning Staff evaluated�, the proposal and surmised that if a zone change were to be granted, a broader area should be considered in order to, encourage and afford the opportunity for commercial revitalization and development. Much of the Redevelopment' Project Area is comprised of narrow lots which preclude the possibility for creative, larger commercial scale development. The owner has not presented plans for a project and does not have plans to substantially upgrade the existing use which is'. vacant, and present a blight to the community. The applicant, indicates that the proposed General Plan Amendment will enable him to move forward with locating a commercial tenant, for the site. However, it is not possible to ascertain; whether such a project will enhance the commercial corridor� in a manner consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. 2. Area Suitabilitv ' The subject area is adequate in size and shape to carry out' the intent of the Commercial designation of the General Plan,, and accommodate the proposed development relative to the. proposed density; bulk of the structures; parking; walls, • - fences; driveways, and other development features required by' the Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, the subject property is' adequately served with the required public utilities and. offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility. � i ; � , 2 � � � ti. �':��-.. � 3. Com liance wi Develo ment Standards • The proposed general plan amendment would enable the propose use to be consistent with the General Plan and meets all the development standards required by the Zoning Ordinance regarding ofP-street parking; front, and rear yard setbacks; lot coverage, height, and required landscaping. However, the proposed use is currently inconsistent with the adopted General Plan and zoning for the area. , 4. Compatibility The proposed project will be located in an area of mixed land uses. Located to the north is multifamily dwelling unit, a church, and auto repair shop. Properties located to the , south and east are commercial/retail uses. And, to the west are developed as single-family/multi-family residential respectively. ; 5. Conditions of Approval The General Plan Amendment and improvements proposed, subject; to the conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on the values of , the surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. However, the proposed use will not materially improve the area. ' a 6. Benefits to Communitv The proposed General Plan Amendment may enhance the� neighborhood and may act as a catalyst to foster other quality developments. However, the General Plan Amendment and proposed development would preclude residential' development of the property anticipated in the City's General� Plan and Redevelopment Planning. 7. Environmental Assessment The Community Development Department Director has determined that no substantial environment impact will result from the' proposed General Plan Amendment; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been filed in the Community Development; Department and in the Office of the City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: , Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission deny the application for General Plan, Amendment No. 7. ' i ATTACHMENTS � 1. Location Map _ ' 2. Site Plan .. , j � f\planning\staffrpt\f:zc7 ' , t 3 ! � i T � � , _ __ ---------_ _ _...... _.....__ `__—�,... _ .... --- � � 7 = : ' ' , LOCATION iVIAP ` a � ��. Cp � �`A`� v� ov ,/�p�� i , �' --jj-�; ?O' - - . :I'f' . � �--� .. � � � � _ .. . v � � i IieW ziit ' 31 _' '_ Z['__ " " , i . ' _ _ „ � „°'� l A � : ��e, -rs--- N --rr,=° LpVIN,, :'.,: , '- � - ; „.�,, ,��, ,:,� c ti��a1 , � , t yL 74 p lL 11 c F11DY ,. � ' O w�� ., .� ' / ~ . �Jf � "' �� e h l�lU 1 n� A� E " / 3 - 'le � �' . f eru .o.' ' n.: re � [v I ... /11f1 � h q1/3 ; . � >7 ' ` / ` 1 I: w ^� � 1i131 � A� I � � r ' 6 ¢ 1' N tI �� . ', ^ p � ° . i ' `�� - ri -- --- viie � 17777 ' �� . 75 g Z �( � � c__ _.:. _i..p�� _'!v'__'___ h/ n� 74f. � ' �- i. 0 v79 - 7. 7__' v s '}� x . � � : i.ai� e �, � a�i. :y . - : e � j . - .� . . =, �� ' t �a� � Z.St� •o � � /)�2� ti �� fS� 8 �+ 4 ` �5. ,�;. .�`�1. �a H ' � - . 121 ti�i �. I i v: • � ��i� �6 __JuF___ _ _ _ ' - _ 1770) � � Q a �.�� . � �, ° I .. a �� . 4 � 9''s '; u, a P . _ _ ,� �Q Z , ? , I � � + s: 90 s.re zs'i ,� ? � \ . v ! a $6, �7 .; � � � � I � �': �. I: : ��i �'� ' : ` � �Yl � �l , . . � I '� `� � • ' _ � . li � i I I 11 �,� P�, _:r � a � z; ,- ' � i '�--------� - "- - , _ _��s� - • R � .,, „- - - v_ ,,, �L , � = a�--°` , !— � q � ` ` '� z •'� ,' ' �` �. , � Q ,�.. N�,`-a y? � � r ..,� . � . `�^ p . al ir7r�r i .. � n� . J °$� b.=g • i I t� � �� I -- Q �� r. +° v .,� � I i .i � �, . � ' : , � � i�-.,, a � °' , i, ! - I � -a��.. z � < . I: �� : �,, ;= � , j , , � ti � �i 9 se.s .,+s �m ..� �, J � � --- CARLIN� E� '� � , SE� ; � L _� b�. � f Q i /�IJI '! n `� � O .� �= s _ ' � a � �i)y��, a I: '. W l L__L1___` � / � .r! a . . . � i� !:j- Z ` ff �7 v ; . W .� N �T -= -- Q ,.,..—`�,. �a'4 .�, a 4 . Q P S , ' � �r" � ! " � ` .. ., ---`� � — --- .. .�aH `,,!.• �_ � �� • d � . Z ; Ji � � � '. .i.:, w fr s � e' ,. � i. � � /E ,u.. ,u � 's .,. � u.t ir^ . i,,� � - „ � �... a „� a _.�� r� , . 1 ; :, CASE N0. �' �'��` _ . ____________ � , .,. �. • � ,A � � t) � � ' i�('; � .. ._... . � ; '�. i.� � `, (;: � � 4 � ? I 1 � ' �� . � �;2 ' . � w\ � , 7 � �� TiT�ri(1� . � ,� . �+ O O �� 1 O i � Ot i . � / I ��• I /�_ M/1•/l ' N/ . �1// /Y ♦N 1 �J .1� , N 1 � F-w, �, , „ _' _' � y L w.,,� Q 0 � i. ,� . k � a y � o b�' „ � i! Q Q k�> - . ( rt.![H ____lY"L____� �O ,� "° •. ' �___—_ i ' . � " O . �' � . b A G�.LY -�� j '��' ��u �________!d:fL_______ O .r � �Oa�;OQLt Q t � . '. O S'� � tiO= ' r t {.w i w � � C. . V/ . Y 0 �� ti a� �� ".�' e ----------s'�'------- ' eQe o � �O 0!S ' m ,�p v „� �x o p x , . � --- � O� � �, ..,. • � � ,,.-�- �-r-- -��T, -- `o= � „ �0 �g r � Q . m .� � � � �(�A Q b Oa, �_� e � a � ,� y,�• tl � i • 11 C w n y a �� /,�/ a x tl � l� ! X i�7 U � k q�o� 6 �\ ° a, aa u.. . �� n s � --- ---------F---- ' w hZHO AK.Y � (l � ,o�, , ,�; • � � r e 'L 6 f/� A k � i�.3 i t I � �" "' vr ' p s$ G �= P A V ♦ N w1 �11'tf Y!f ,' T ° �� _ �'� O 3� e � S�O� � � ��°s v . r . ua �x� rn a � u ri it a � .. ,. n � � t� � ��I � = Z G r,�v/ 1 � � � Y �' D � 2.. 6 � 1 N � Q � D ; Z � .. �ii Q r n'77. r ,- — — : . ia C ° � V ° .r/�.;. y asxf aa�vaoo� x Z °_� i i Z N . n ,�. .�% anr : � � +��,,�_�. �� r,a�e is I --- I a i � �� .�.��. . . coas � �� [�g'i ��-�� .€! - u �}`•^ ;/slxwr m.. e„ . ._, O; ; , � A P n o . N � LT:'L �I. •, .}A '!�� /�) �J '�' � o � , � rfFC :��,,�:, � o � � 3 � ; ; �____ I ti ^ru�.isrf O D p'O a � � , � ��,.. � ie � 3�,;,, � � , � p ,, r i a " ^ a,,.�� ..:, ' Z D .. H i^ �_.��U � � ��----:. •.1-' n ue�� _� c E t � ��•i, i i , ;�y ,r; ;s.,• D� � o " f�n `� t I� � ... ni i �� l` p`am Z O '°'� "-F: i t r� � � � o �• / o Ism �. i D' � � � a L/ na:r � AX r I Of I ot 1 w::^• � ^I . pf IP' d . � . . . . � ; � � J 3 � > ° :� � - -$ .3i�b� 8— ►as•n:o 711N�/ _, . - - m , O S< Z i r o, 3 ' S v n : ' o �r � 'e `^ `� SI 41 fl �21 (n 8 � B L 9 S b E 2� � L ? � X ^ ' .. ^': F � � � � .�/� � � � � 0 � �,� �: S � �� f.vc oc `/ of /C'�/ � � � 0 9'lL /1. . . � / l � � "� � __ � . . . 1 ti `� LI BI 61 OZ � IZ ZZ , fZ V2 St 9e L2 BZ , 6Z � n � n � :� n a, n � m � �, � n :; ; — -;� - - ---- - _. _ ?a. ' � ^.