HomeMy Public PortalAboutA1993-10-12 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION �� • •
� AGENDA
LYNWOOD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING - 7:30 P.M.
City Hall Council Chambers � �
iis3o suliis Road Lynwooa, c R EIV E D I
CI OF LYNWOOD
CITY CLERKS OFFICE
October iz, 1993 OCT i 1993
AM PM
7i8i9iID�llil2i1i2i3i4i�is '
Errick R. Lee
Chairperson
Carlton McMiller pon�l Do�
Vice Chairman Commissioner
Elizabeth Dixon Roy Pryor
Commissioner Commissioner
Jamal Muhsin Joyce Iiurley
Commissioner Commissioner
t
C O M M I S S I O N C O U N S E L:
. Henry S. Barbosa Kenneth Fong �
City Attorney Deputy City Attorney .
STAFF:
Sol Blumenfeld, Director Louis Omoruyi
Community Development Department Associate Planner
Art Barfield Paul Nguyen
Associate Planner Civil Engineer Assoc.,
Louis E. Morales, Jr:
Associate Planner
6�.
f:\wpfiles\oct93 � �. �..
1 .
I
,' , �, . . . . '�
4
. ' i
i I
. � �
October 12, 1993
OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Call meeting to order.
B. Flag salute.
C. Roll call of Commissioners.
D. Certification of Agenda Posting.
E. Approval and signing of minutes for the September 14, 1993
Planning Commission Meeting.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING:
1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CASE N0. 7
Applicant: H. Sean Dayani
' COMMENTS:
The applicant is requesting approval of a General Plan
Amendment (GPA 7) from Town House & Cluster Aousing to a
Commercial designation for an area, the subject property,
approximately 75,00o s.quare feet in size in order to consider
future commercial development for the area on the west side of
Atlantic Avenue, between Lavinia and Carlin Avenue, in the R-2 �
(Two-Family Residential) zone. I
RECOMMENDED ACTION: I
I
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the ' �
Planning Commission continue this case until the November 9, ;
, 1993 Planning Commission meeting to permit time to revise �
project plans per the request of the applicant. '%
2. ZONE CHANGE CASE N0. 7 I
Applicant: H. Sean Dayani �
COMMENTS: i
The applicant is requesting approval of a Zone Charige from R-2, I
(Two-Family Residential) to C-2 (Commercial) for an area, the
subject property, approximately 75,000 square feet in size in '
order to consider future commercial development for the area .
on the west side of Atlantic Avenue, between Lavinia and �
i
Carlin Avenue in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: �
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the j
Planning Commission continue this case until the November 9, '
1993 Planning Commission meeting to permit time to revise �
project plans per the request of the applicant.
3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO 132 j
Applicant: Manuel Mancilla ��°
" f
COMMENTS: �
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit in order� �
to establish an automobile repair center at 2918 E. Imperial �
Hwy. in the M(Industrial) zone. '. i
I
f:\upfiles�oct93 I
�
2 �
�
�
i
I
I
' � �
RECOMMENDED ACTION: '
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2487:
l. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 132
will not have a significant effect on the environment and
certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate.
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 132, subject to the
stated conditions and requirements.
4. MODIFIED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 125M
Applicant: Rick Kessler
COMMENTS:
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to develop a sixteen (16) unit townhouse development at
4291 Carlin Avenue in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone.
This item was approved by the Planning Commission on June 8,
1993 and subsequently appealed to City Council. The item was N:
to be returned for further input by the community and reheard
by the Planning Commission. �
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff respectfully requests that this case be continued to the
November 9, 1993 Planning Commission meeting pursuant to the
applicant's request.
5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 133
Applicant: Albert Moran
COMMENTS•
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to I
develop a 20,000 roller rink that will include a Disk Jockey �
(DJ) booth, two (2) arcade rooms, a concession booth, and an I
adult lounge area in an existing building at 3840 Martin
Luther King Jr. Boulevard in the C-2 (Light Commercial) zone.
This item was continued from the September 14, 1993 meeting in I
order to 1) allow the applicant to discuss a detail security
plan with the neighborhood, 2) revise plans to show closure of !
site onto Erxiestine Avenue, and 3) provide separate bathroom '.{ �
facilities for the subject use. j
RECOMMENDED ACTION: �
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the I
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2489: �
1. Certifying that the project will not have a negative I
effect on the environment, the Director of Community �
Development has issued a Negative Declaration.
i
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 133, subject to the � i
stated conditions and requirements. �
NEW PUSLZC HEARING: j
6. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CASE NO. 8 �
Applicant: City of Lynwood I
COMMENTS: �
The applicant is requesting approval of a General Plan ^ I
Amendment (GPA 8) from CB-1 (COmmercial) to R-1 (Single Family I
Residential) in order to construct a single family home on the
north side of Louise Street, between Nichols and Gertrude �
i
3 �
� I
'
�
'
;
�
' - � �
Avenue, in the CB-1 (Commercial) zone.
RECOMNIENDED ACTION:
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2494:
l. Approving Resolution No. 2494 and recommending City
Council adoption of General Plan Amendment, Case No. 8.
2. Certifying that the project will not have a significant
effect on the environment-and that a Negative Declaration
has been issued pursuant to the provisions of State CEQA
Guidelines.
7. ZONE CHANGE CASE NO. 8
Applicant: City of Lynwood
COMMENTS:
The applicant is requesting approval of a Zone Change (ZC 8)
from CB-1 (Commercial) to R-1 (Single Family Residential) in
order to construct a single family home on the north side of
Louise Street, between Nichols and Gertrude Avenue, in the
CB-1 (Commercial) zone.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2494:
�f .
1. �Approving Resolution No. 2494 and recommending City
Council adoption of Zone Change, Case No. 8.
2. Certifying that the project will not have a significant �
effect on the environment and that a Negative Declaration �
has been issued pursuant to the provisions of State CEQA i
Guidelines.
8. VARIANCE CASE N0. VAR 25 I
Applicant: Joel Govea
COMMENTS: �
The applican� is requesting a Variance to allow reduction of ±
the requiPed lot width from fifty (50') feet to forty five i
(45') feet in order to develop a single family dwelling on a i
lot at 11128 Louise Avenue, in the R-3 (Multi-Family �
Residential) zone, Lynwood, California.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: I
I
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the '!• i
Planning Commission approve the Variance request: ", I
1. Finding'that a hardship has been established that would I
require a Variance for Case No. 25 as determined by �
Section 25-26 of the City of Lynwood Zoning Code. i
2. Finding that the applicant/property owner will not be �
deprived of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other
properties in the same vicinity if Variance Case No. 25 �
is approved. �
1
�
I
;
f:\upfiles\oct93
i
I
4 I
(
�
f
. �
�::,
. � �
9. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP CASE N0. TPM 30
Applicant: Joel Govea
COMMENTS:
The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map
No. 10634 for the purpose of subdividing one (1) lot into two
(2) parcels at 11128 Louise Avenue in the R-3 (Multi-Family
Residential) zone, Lynwood, CA.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2491.
1. Certifyinq that the project is Categorically Exempt from
the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by ._
Section 15061b(3).
2. Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 30, subject to the
stated conditions and requirements.
10. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 135
Applicant: Joel Govea
COMMENTS:
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to develop a single family dwelling at 11128 Louise
Avenue in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone.
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopts Resolution No. 2493: ,
� 1. Certifying that the project is Categorically Exempt from +
the provision of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by /; �
Section 15061b ( 3 ) . "!;-
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 135, subject I
to the stated conditions and requirements. �
11. CONDITIONAL USE PERMZT CASE NO. 134 �
Applicant_ David'Herrera
COMMENTS:
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit in order
to develop an addition to an existing auto body and fender
shop at 10840 Long Beach Boulevard in the C-2A (Medium .�
CommerciaT) zone.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: I
I
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the �
Planninq Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2490 I
1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 134 '
will not have a significant effect on the environment and m I
certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate. �°<>.e+
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 134, subject to the P I
stated conditions and requirements.
I
I
I
�
f:\wpfi�es\oct93 � i
�
5 I
i
I
I
I
..�.. , , �
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS
None
STAFF COMMENTS
* Auto Sales/Service Ordinance •
* Move-On Ordinance
* Fence Height Ordinance
COMMENTS
PUBLIC ORALS
COMMISSION ORALS
ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
November 9, 1993 at 7:30 p.m., in the�City Hall Council Chambers,
11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California.
_ -
�
`G i
f:\upfiles\oct93 . ,.' I
�
%
i
'
I
I
�
I
i
' I
i
�
6 �
.
,> �
�
�
�
�`- �� • AGENDA I�M N0. �
DATE: October 12, 1993
To: PLANNING COMMISSION CASE N0 Z
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director �
Community Development Dep ment
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 132
Applicant: MANUEL MANCILLA
PROPOSAL•
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit in order to
establish an automobile repair center at 2918 E Imperial Hwy in
the M (Industrial) zone.
FACTS•
1. Source of Authoritv
Section 25-16.15 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that
a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to operate any
business with respect to automobile uses.
2. Propertv Location ,
The subject property consists of a regular shaped lot on the
south side of E. Imperial Hwy. between Oakwood Avenue and
Beechwood Avenue (see attached location map).
3. Property Size
The subject property is approximately 10,000 square feet in I
size.
4. Existina Land Use �
(
The subject site contains two (2) existing structures which j
are approximately 4,000 square feet. The surrounding land I
uses are as follows:
North-Commercial East-Industrial
South-Commercial West-Commercial
5. Land Use Description
General P1ari: Zonina• I
a;, ,
North-Industrial North-M �
South-Industrial South-M %
i
East-Industrial East-M �
West-Industrial West-M i
6. Proiect Characteristics: �
The applicant proposes to operate a full service automotive i
repair center (auto repair and body and fender works) in an
existing structure which is presently vacant with minor �
proposed renovations. The structure consists of �
approximately 3,952 square feet. There is no landscape on ;
site presently, however, Staff is requiring a minimum of 7% I
landscape to screen the proposed use, and the applicant has �
shown 8.4% on the attached plan. •
Staff has prepared an alternative design in order to resolve �
the Planning Commission concerns relative to proper �
screening of auto uses and incorporation of such uses within '
the City's retail corridors. Staff's design entails creating �
I
�
1 �
I
�
'
�
I
;.,�.
a"Facade/Wal� which is consistent in d• gn and scale with
other retail uses in the City. The applicant declined to
incorporate the "Facade/Wall" which would screen the use
from the public view. Therefore there would be no major
renovation of the existing structure and the applicant is
proposing a simple ten (10) foot high wrought iron fence
which exceeds the City's fence height requirements of three '
(3) foot high.
7. Site Plan Review -
At its regular meeting on Thursday, July 29, 1993, the Site
Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and
recommended approval to the Planning Commission subject to
the conditions and requirements stated in attached reso-
lution
8. Zoninct Enforcement Histor�
None of Record
9. Public Resoonses
None of record at the time this report was prepared.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION:
1. Consistencv with General Plan
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning
classification of M(INDUSTRIAL) and General Plan designa-
tion of Manufacturing. Therefore, granting Conditional Use
Permit No. 132 will not adversely affect the Lynwood General j
Plan. �
I
2. Site Suitabilitv �
The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate I
the proposed development relative to structures, parking,
walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development I
features required by the Zoning Ordinance. �
F I
3. Compatibility ,' I
The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of I
commercial developments; therefore, the project will be
compatible Gcith the surrounding land uses. I
4. Comnliance with Develooment Standards
(
The proposal meets the development standards required by the I
Zoning Ordinance with respect to setbacks; lot coverage; �
building height and density. �
5. Conditions of Anoroval
I
�
The im rovements as �
P proposed, subject to the conditions I
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, would not
have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding
properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, '
safety or welfare. I
6. Benefits to Communitv I
�. �
The proposal will assist in upgrading the commercial use of :�
the property and support the commercial intent designation
of the General Plan. , �
I
�
i
f:\staftrpt\cup132a f
�
i
2 I
I
I
(
' 7. Environmenta •ssessment •
Staff has found that no substantial environmental impact
will result from the proposed development; therefore, a
Negative Declaration has been.filed in the Community
Development Department and in the office of the City Clerk.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning ,
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2487:
A. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 132
will not have a significant effect on the environment
and certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate.
B. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 132, subject to the
stated conditions and requirements.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. Resolution No. 2487
3. Site Plan
4. Alternative Design
I
„ �
(
I
i
_ I
_. I
�
I
r5 �, I
I
�
f:\staffrpt\wpi32a I
I
I
I
I
. �
�
I
I
I
i
3 I
�
, I
�
LOCATION iVIAP ��
__ ._�--- / �
BCVO 9 � � �OS FLORES �
i CARNAT/ON
.��r i� i ��S i c Y A . ...
� ti r • „ + ` � µ � � BLl�O � C/R<YE
h Y . � .es Y'� ua i�r q h I" r ' �' ....
.ev ..I � I
'ot n� iu p ; o n n / '�r.
�' .° �� • � L ^ % , . ,
.e o' .n
� u• _ '
ioa q� iit - � s '
�.e
n .x us � ' i I �
in 'g �� . v I � a n e. v v r .
se .i. ,' ii� 6. .,I.� ' �r � �x
a� ��� u� iN c � . y... ' r .li n �o
a ' ita
, � i.� „ �� � i � WKNTKN AVE i
ni on , u . . . . . . . ,. ,.... ,,.
Qo y � i ! '
9i �� ��, iSi t5 1erer�uu'i.'n uu�uu• r>�uvnnr � ew u,- a -- y .
9l ii< A�� i3] � 1
f) �: n) .p'r' �� m . i� r� 4 i* � ��
; '! � � ir� . a� ul.. u < e s n � r r. �o a �i u.� � o a o ; 9
.'�> > ;» , "� i
.
• : • µ . . . . . .
� 4 b , '�� •�� • . +� � l - /MPEF/AL $ N/GHWAY g .
�� 9 •r •
. ie � � � r
� °. ,� n/u �„ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .„ a „
� V '� I� + A�ND *♦ 8ie 40 {!f IY fHHI!)J lIHISDM/
�F� • � i
"�/ Jl /Ll� JIl/ HHII I�M/ YYqI//IMpY/JR//. � .
z ; M ?
ass
a u r�•
3 BEEGHW000 AV£. _ ; . . ...
� . . ,p , u � .... �
M �J " �e.
� , � . + ... � . .
�� ��r' . _ ,. ,. L,.t �' :
� '° �•� , � a#y , � I
p � ' .h I
, �, „ _
9 1�'�y �
e / � J yy )
R �/ i I. i; s
P G , ' ° ' : .,'; . ; • �
. '.;`,+;� b
�� � •:> .',' % 3 i ' .
\ h i� ,i � . ��. p.
\ � � ':�. �j ,
N i :
i f I �. . � x r,� � . ...
,, '
, . q "I, . ' I ` ' J � ! {` ; A � . .
J� h ! Q
q al . �' �� ' '
' it �I { , � ` �y �
_ �� J> > > I
�� !� I J
„ S( � �� •
ry J I
�� �� �I (
! + i/ � ' '
Q � �l
� . � `I_` .
'] �J . �/ � lp , 9
2 L " x � �a .. Q ,.
� ,RE �� , , � , ' � . � I
.� '�
i � `� " C
..� � y •� . ' l.
+. . ;
�� � j
_ _ � / f ! • ' • y I � ' 4i
a �I /i I) J� ��I.�{ IM / c P
y � ' ilil )HifH � ��. ,`S,' �e I
� F., . 'J�i.es /
e [OlyE . ! \ \ I
u " ` . I����. . �
I
�
' I
1
. =o% i'.ioa' . , I
I
� � 1
ASE N �
0.
�
.__ ,.. .
�
.. . ����.. 3n _� �.�i. �.��".�S��Q:�.-.,.....� .�. I
• � �
RESOLUTION NO. 2487
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
� APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 132 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND
OPERATION OF AN AUTO REPAIR CENTER
IN THE M(INDUSTRIAL) ZONE, AT 2918
EAST IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, LYNWOOD,
CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject
application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered all
pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined
that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines Section b(3) as amended; and
WHEREAS, the project is consistent with the intent of the
General Plan in that the subject site is classified M(Industri-
al);
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines as follows:
A. That the granting of the proposed Conditional Use Permit
will not adversely affect the General Plan. �
B. That the proposed location of the Conditional Use is in
accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and
the purpose of the zone in which the site is located.
, C. That the proposed location of the Conditional Use and the
conditions under which it would be operated or maintained
will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity;
D. That the proposed Conditional Use Permit will comply with I
each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance
as stated in the conditions below; I
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood I
approves the proposed project subject to the following'
conditions: i
i
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I
1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable
regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform �
Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code. I
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or i
structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community
Development Department, Planning Division, for review. I
3. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement �
of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and
agrees to the conditions stated herein before any building
permits are issued.
4. The applicant shall construct a screening wall pursuant to
the concept plan prepared by the Community Development
Department and shall submit construction drawing for the �
wall to the Director of Community Development for approval �
prior to issuance of a building permit.
1
' �
�
1
� � �
PLANNING DIVISION
5. This permit shall become void one hundred twenty (120) days,
unless extended, after the use permitted has been abandoned
or has ceased to be actively exercised.
6. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood
main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving
the proposed development.
7. All work shall be conducted entirely within an enclosed
building.
8. Daily operating hours shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
9. Reflect artificial light away from adjoining
• properties.
10. No damaqed or wrecked vehicles shall be stored on site. No
portion of the site shall be used for storage unless it is '
auto tire repair and sales related activity.
11. On-site traffic circulation and parking should be developed
in such a manner that ingress and egress accesses are
separated or channeled so that conflicting traffic movements
are minimized.
12. open storage of matezials, products and equipment shall be
completely concealed from view of vehicular and pedestrian
traffic by an architectural barrier approved by the i
Community Development Department Director or his/her
designee.
13. The property shall be used solely for automotive repair
shop.
14. All signage must be reviewed and approved by the Planning, I
Building and Redevelopment Divisions.
15. All necessary permits and licenses shall be obtained prior �
to operation. �
Landscapina
I
16. No less.than 7� of the total site, excluding lot area. I
dedicatecl to p�blic right-of-way, shall be landscaped. The
landscaping plans shall be approved by the Community ;
Development Director prior to installation. '
17. The applicant is required to submit a landscape plan drawn �
by a licensed landscape architect to the satisfaction of the i
Director of Community Development prior to any building '
permit being issued. �
i
18. The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs com-
bined with ground cover as follows: One(1) five (5) gallon '
shrub for each twenty (20) square feet of planter area; two I
(2) fifteen (15) gallon trees for each eight (8) parking
spaces. �
19. All planter area fronting perimeter walls must be landscaped I
with shrubs and or crawling ground cover plants. �
f:\resolutn�reso2487
20. All landscaping shall be permanently maintained. Lawn and I
ground covers are to be trimmed or mowed regularly, with a11 �
planted area kept free of weeds and debris. �
All plantings are to be kept in a healthy and growing '
condition. An automatic sprinkler or irrigation system �
shall be provided and maintained in working condition.
;
i
2
I
� � �
21. There shall be a minimum of thirteen (13) parking spaces
including one (2) handicap parking space.
Each off-street parking space shall not be less than twenty
(20) feet in length and nine (9) feet in width, exclusive of
access driveways or aisles, except as noted below:
22. A parking space designed for the handicapped shall be
provided. This space may be provided as follows:
a. Dimensions. The minimum dimensions of each automobile
parking stall for the handicapped shall be not less than
fourteen (14) feet in width by eighteen (18) feet in
length. Said stalls shall be lined to provide a nine
(9) foot parking area and a five (5) foot loading and
unloading area or;
b. Two (2) spaces may be provided within a twenty-three
(23) foot wide area, lined to provide a nine (9) foot
parking area on each side of a five (5) foot loading and
unloading area. The minimum length of each parking
space shall be eighteen (18) feet.
c. Location. All parking spaces for the handicapped shall
be located adjacent to the main entrance of the facility
for which the spaces are provided. The parking spaces
shall be positioned so that the handicapped persons
shall not be required to walk or wheel behind parked
vehicles.
23. The parking arrangement for the subject site shall have a
cir.cular flow arrangement without dead-end aisles when
possible.
24. The applicant shall submit elevation drawings to the Plan-
ning Division showing the exterior building design; includ-
ing the specification of colors, and materials. Prior to
the issuance of building permits, the design of the subject I
building including color and materials, must be approved by
the Community Development Director or his/her designee. ,
25. Prior to the installation, display, enlarging, modifying I
relocating or changing of signs, a permit must be obtained I
from th� pepartment of Community Development, Planning
Division.
26. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally I
compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent
buildings. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc.
shall be installed without the prior written approval of the
Director of Community Development and required building
permits.
27. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in a '
sanitary condition pending construction and shall be main- I
tained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure I
to comply may result in revocation of the Conditional Use
Permit.
i
28. A cover sheet of approved Conditions must be attached to �
plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety Divi- �
sion. I
f:\reso Wtn\reso2487 . I
29: Any violation of said conditions in this resolution may �
result in revocation or modification of the Conditional Use �
Permit by the issuing body at a reqularly scheduled meeting.
�
I
• I
3 �
I
I
--- ! •
PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
30. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all
off-site improvements.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
31. Provide approved portable fire extinguisher 40 B.C. type: •
32. No auto spray painting shall be conducted without approved
spray booth.
Section 3. A copy of Resolution 2487 shall be delivered to
the applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1993, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
- �
Errick R. Lee, Chairperson
I
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: I
I
, I
..
I
Sol Blumenfeld, Director Ken Fong
Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney I
I
�
I
i
I
f:\resolutn\reso2487
I
I
I
I
4 �i
I
I
' � • AGENDA IT�1JI N0.�.1..��
' DATE: October , 1993
. TO: PLANNING COMMISSION CASE N0. G v ��
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director �
Community Development Depa ment
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 133 .
Applicant: Albert Moran �
Pr000sal
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to develop a
roller rink, approximately 20,00o square feet in size, featuring
a Disk Jockey (DJ) booth, two (2) arcade rooms, and a concession
booth, in an existing building at 3840 Martin Luther King Jr.
� Boulevard in the C-2 (Light Commercial) zone. This Item was
continued from the September 14, 1993 meeting in order to 1)
allow the applicant to discuss a detail security plan with the,
. neighborhood 2) revise plans to show closure of site onto.
Ernestine Avenue, and 3) provide separate bathroom facilities for
the subject use and designation of waiting area.
Facts '
1. Source of Authoritv
' Section 25-8.9 a. of the Zoning Ordinance requires approval
of a Conditional Use Permit to allow amusement arcades ,
2, Prooerty Location'
The subject property is located at the intersect'ion of
Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard and Ernestine Avenue,
southwest corner.
3. Propertv Size
The subject site is rectangular in shape, and approximately �
64,000 square in size (400'x160'). '
4. Existina Land Use
The site contains a restaurant, 6804 square feet in size, in
a 33,000 square foot building. However, the restaurant is
not a part of this proposal. Under City Council Resolution '
No. 92-133A, the restaurant and former bar area is!
' consolidated and seal off from the remainder of the'
structure: Tkie site also contains a parking area on its
• west and south sides. The surrounding land uses are as,�
follows;
North - Commercial/Retail East - Residential
South - Public Parking Area West - Commercial/Auto Use ,
5. Land i7se Description
i
The General Plan designation for the subject property is ;
Commercial, _and the zoning classification is C-2 (Light , �•
Commercial). The surrounding land uses, are as follows:
General Plan Zoning
North - Commercial North - C-2 ;
'_ 5outh - Public Facility South - P-1 .'
East - Single Family Residential East - R-1
West - Commercial West - C-2
� f:\staffrpt\cup133a � . . �
1
} • • • r
6. Project Characteristics:
The applicant proposes to develop and operate a 20,000 ,
square foot skating rink, including a DJ booth, one arcade;
room accommodating 50 video game machines, and another
arcade room for children under ten (10) years old, and a
- concession booth. The arcade rooms will have two (2) to
three (3) employees monitoring activities. The existing
building, containing an existing restaurant/lounge, will be,
, altered with tenant improvements and exterior upgrading. The
project plans indicate that the subject site has a total of,
172 parking spaces. The proposed plan calls for five (5%),
landscaping of the subject site. ,
7. Lvnwood Redevelopment Agencv �
The subject project is located in the City's Redevelopment`
Project (Project Area "A"). The Lynwood Redevelopment
Agency requires review of all projects in conjunction with�
Planning Commission approval for projects in Project Area.
nAv .
' 8. Zoninq Enforcement History
On August 23, 1993, a Last and Final Notification was sent
to the property owner to: '
1. Remove semi-trucks and trailers stored at the site
2. Remove junk, trash, and debris in slope leading to the !
` parking area.
9. Neighborhood Resbonse ,
On August 29, 1993, neighborhood representatives met with ,
the applicant to discuss the proposal. Below, are the set .
of issues and are concerns raised during the meeting. -
On October 6, 1993, the applicants met with the neighborhood �
to review revised plans and a proposed security system. '
Staff will provide an addendum report to the Commission at :
the time of the meeting. �
Traffic, Parkina and Security
. o Will ttiere be security outside the building? Will the ,
parking lot be for patrons only? Will there be traffic
control to direct cars into and out of the parking area so
that traffic will not impact Ernestine Avenue? What about
parking on the neighborhood street? Can the alley be blocked '
off to prevent traffic onto Ernestine Avenue? Block the '
alley and any entrances leading from the parking lot onto
Ernestine Avenue. Will there be an environmental assessment
to determine the traffic impact along Martin Luther King,
3r. Boulevard and Ernestine Avenue? How do you prevent gang �
� members from using the skating rink facility as their
"turf"? Will there be a dress code enforced i.e. no gang '
attire, gang type hats, etc.? Will patrons be searched for
weapons? Will roller blades be allowed on the skating rink _
floor?
. Z
;
' • Operations • • ;
o Will this be a regional skating rink? What is the
projected opening date for the roller rink? What will be�
the capacity of the skating rink? What are the proposed
hours of operation? What about weekend hours of operations?
Can a curfew be enforced? How many people will be employed
at the rink? During Saturday and Sunday, in the afternoon,'
will there be skating sessions for small children only, and,
or lesson skating?
Will adult night skating take place on a weekend night, so
that teenage traffic can be reduced during that time?
These issues and concerns are addressed in the following
section.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
1. Consistencv with General Plan ,
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning�
classification of C-2 (Light Commercial) and the General
Plan designation of Commercial, therefore, granting
Conditional Use Permit No. 133, will not adversely affect
the General Plan.
2. Site Suitabilitv
The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate .
the proposed development relative to structures, parking,
� walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development
features required by the Zoning Ordinance. The existing
uses i.e. restaurant and lounge, and the proposed use•
combines to require 172 parking spaces. The project
provides 172 parking spaces, in conformance with the
requirements of the city.
Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard is a major arterial and is
well suited to carry the quantity of traffic the proposed
development would generate. The General Plan allows for a,
maximum daily capacity of traffic at 40,000 vehicles per day
(ADT) at Bullis Road and Martin Luther King Boulevard. The .
ADT along this arterial is 14,890 vehicles per day.
Approval of this proposal will not exceed the maximum ADT
for this arterial. Ernestine Avenue is classified under the :
General Alan as a local street whose primary function is to
provide direct access to abutting properties. With the
proposed closure of access onto Ernestine Avenue from the
subject site, the proposal will have little impact to the
local street.
A. Traffic and Parkinq. (Response to Section 91
1) Will the parking lot be for patrons only? �
The parking lot will serve patrons and employees
of the existing restaurant and the roller rink,
only, and parking on site is adequate to meet this ,
need.
2) Will there be traffic control to direct cars into
and out of the parking area so that traffic will
not impact Ernestine Avenue?
The applicant will be required to close all access
from the subject property onto Ernestine Avenue.
3
3) Wha�about parking on the neig�orhood street?
It is suggested by the Parks and Recreation
Department that limited parking be established for
Ernestine Avenue, and a��no parking" zone be
designated in front of a portion of the restaurant
and the proposed project in order to prevent
parking congestion along Ernestine Avenue. The
City will initiate a no parking zone along
building frontage of the projects.
4) Can the alley be blocked off to prevent traffic
onto Ernestine Avenue?
The applicant will be required to request a
vacation of the existing alley and block all
access to Ernestine Avenue.
5) Will there be an environmental assessment to
determine the traffic impact along Ernestine
Avenue and Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard?
See above under 2. Site Suitabilitv.
B. Securitv.
1) Will there be security outside the building?
The applicant will be required to post security in
the parking area(s).
2) How do you prevent gang member from using the
skating rink facility as their "turf"?
Through the imposition of security personal, on-
site and within the facility, gang activity can be
kept at a minimum.
3) Will there be a dress code enforced?
The City does not have the authority to impose a
dress code. However, a dress code can be imposed
by the operator of the facility.
4) Can a curfew be enforced?
-City'Codes establish a curfew for minor under
Ordinance No. 1328 and is enforced by the
Sheriff's Department.
5) Will patrons be searched for weapons?
The applicant will be required to provide security ,
at the entrance of the roller rink.
C. Operations.
1) Will this be a regional roller rink?
The applicant's tiusiness plan indicates that the
project will attract patrons beyond the City of
Lynwood.
2) What is the projected opening date for the
project? •
The applicant has indicated January 1, 1994 as the
opening date.
4
3) Wha�will be the capacity of t• rink?
The Lynwood Fire Department allows a maximum of
414 persons in the facility.
_ 4) What are the hours of operation? �
The applicant's business plan calls for the
. � facility to be open seven (7) days per week.
Monday thru Wednesdays, 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m,;
Thursdays, Fridays, 3:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m.; and,
Sundays, 12:00 noon to 10:00 p.m. During summer.
months, the rink will be opened 12 noon everyday.
5) How many persons will be employed? ,
According to the applicant, twenty (20) to thirty
(30) part-time and full time employees.
a
6) Will their be special session for children?
The applicant indicates that the program remains
to be established.
7) Will their be adult night skating on the weekend?
The applicant indicates that this aspect of the:
programming has not been established.
3. ComPatibilitV �
The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of ,
, commercial developments, public facilities, and residential
uses. The community will benefit with the addition of a
- roller rink. Aowever, the neighborhood expressed concerns
regarding increase traffic, noise, and parking congestion
along Ernestine Avenue and other nearby neighborhood street..
With respect to noise, Ordinance No. 1300 prohibits loud and
unruly assemblage and is in effect.
- In addition, the City recently sent a notice to all ,
residents regarding loud music and loud parties under.
penalty of a fine. Neighborhood security is also an issue'
, raised by the rieighborhood. These issues must be mitigated � �
; by the applicant and through conditions of approval by the '
City. Ultimately the Conditional Use Permit can be revoked;
if the applicant fails to comply with the conditions of
approval. `
The City is contemplating a reevaluation of the land use and ;
development within the Civic Center. The applicant is:
proposing to redevelop the facility in connection with
_ property improvements coordinated with the City. The�
proposed roller rink would be located within the Civic;
Center and the boundaries of Redevelopment Project Area
"A• ,
The proposal for a roller rink is commensurate with
redevelopment of the area. With the exception of the '
restaurant, which has been in operation since 1991, the
.' buildinq has been vacant for approximately six years, and
was used briefly as a swap meet facility in 1987. ;'
z
'
, 5
' � �
4. Compliance with Development Standards
The proposal conforms to the development standards required
by the Zoning Ordinance with respect to setbacks; lot
coverage; building heights; parking; and, amusement arcades.
The proposal carries out a number of goals from some of the
Elements of the General Plan. They are as follows:
City Concept Goal 1: The potential of creating and
establishing a high quality of life for City residents.
Goal 2: Provides for the strengthening and expanding
of existing Lynwood businesses under the Economic
Development Element of the General Plan.
Land Use Goal 5: The encouragement of the development
of new commercial and retail uses in locations where they
can most efficiently provide Lynwood residents with needed
products, services, and employment opportunities.
b. Conditions of Abproval
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Community Development Department, will,
not have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding
properties or interfere with or endanger the public health,
safety or welfare.
6. Benefits to Communitv
The proposal will facilitate upgrading the commercial use
of the property and support the commercial designation of
the General Plan.
7. Environmental Assessment
The Community Development Department has determined that the
project could not have a significant effect on the
environment. Therefore, a Neqative Declaration has been
prepared and is on file in the Community Development
Department office and in the office of the City Clerk.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfull-y requests that after consideration the Planning
Commission adapt the attached Resolution No. 2489.
1. Certifying that the project will not have a negative
effect on the environment,�the Director of Community
Development has issued a Negative Declaration.
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 133, subject to the
stated conditions and requirements.
Attachments
1. Location Map
2. Business Plan
3. Plot Plan
4. Resolution No. 2489
f\planning\staffrpt\f:cup133
6
I
= --..._ -- __—
_ __-- ...-� -- --
. . ... ... ... .. ___ .�.`..
�
' �
i
L.00ATION iVIAP ' ;
�
STREET i E � ] � Q 7 .^ y � $ a ��� 'OO �y '+'�
c ,, R is�o� ai.a� R n ^ � +� � � 1 �1 �1 t1� �i d� �� � ��,��(�.�::::
� q s� �� � ier :a� tav tao :ai zv� :w za. tas :ae o� ' �F ''��Y,
yD� � Ila3i ' 2 l� • �/.
rl � , si � e,�zzs��..,`�' � � z,u� °,�37':;;ii�;��
9 g �� � . Jo
o ti o �4 �, Jj���a y `� r��a;, �° .';`..'
� y .
Q � r� e S� Sy �A��, ` �' t�s'.zo�vy
y� son ao 5o pi.�i R s
� • tt 1 .soa. sa � , . . 1j � 1 � l • .4'i;�:
. PS V / �3o I ia i � � �J ' , /
' : . JE 6 � d � � ZEI � I �� � d � •
J
e zas rbs �� za� :ez zei zao v ne z» „ ',. 3�2�,�q :� p1
E , J� IR ,C �.,;: ,
� � m , . ^�
u 7 sa � ♦ 2 y� ,y` � I hg y5�� �s r a ��� R .� ��� �� L!.
� � ise.o� i � 60 (�11�'d!J . ' �
O n ��` e�,?�� .
�� 4 2
M � K b��, J��.`5 ,,,1
,,. ,�� � a �..,, �
4 w�
` - .�..o>� �,wm so ' g �
-. '� �° . � f � a sa � � .
� //) //6 // //! /l / 70 /O � �V B �
1p . � 6 ��ar � �
� l 13 � o � F �'�1 I
C CE / esee �,9 �� J�PL �
P �'L 699 SO 30 ->i h lI DQ z / �I` M1 �
��
Q 6990 50 ' 0 ':. .
. . . . . „ //�ib g v /a�3 � `l � � f
. h e'j �e i y b "� /!�.+ . .
„ne u� i:o izi ns z� iz ue � n �� � a;� , �� i' o�
. � � $ b n a� y � ° z �� , Q �� i o � y , ��.
� � � � u //3J A � �a� �q � 1139 y.
. O � yl ii� ip !� � Q�� p2� (,c
so aiRes ii3a0 � ar}3/ ° ��° �i�` !1.7� \�.:�
/oo . � d R' Q. �,.
' . V �� ��M h i� � � !� 0 ::
� � . //3Y9 � ii�3 i3 �♦ �� ,b :
ioi � u ea E ���e y� :.a, °° o
' i o ioe6 n ip b
� i/d!( � /i3vj /l3ya� //,�i35
� /07 p
. . . �( � e�4 � 'oo � �RT �
... �/OJy�p �l1'Y i/ 60 ��� y
00 � �� q .. . �.i� � °� .� S �a $� °��
S� y Cirv ` � ' �eaj57' . '�ps8 Q �/��� .
e i� �
J � ize B ' iasPO. : B S'�', W i/36(� ���7/
� m u � � ' - eo ai $
a ioe • ei'S � 1i3� iidP� ..
o � J$ ei y � aa
h g � � Z
� � � :.'y�� �122 � 30 ..
� ° es s�
C ,� •.�h � WOOOL.Ii%.N AV(;.�.�.
. .( R� ; 2 ui� L`o 33 � Aa0 Y vt0 S�, '1aec� • �:�:i�j'
1 � ..`���� � -i • .O . � yy V �il \.y•
. , b � � r � �: i � 5�,� �e`� �w e ��T �'�..';
- r � w ]co �� �I M ... �q_ro ; p{,� , � m � ..
4h
3G0 OQ 60 GO SJ 51�0 SS In60I J/99
�
/
i
i
CASE N0. , � .
��� ,
� �
" � �
RESOLUTION NO. 2489
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT CASE NO. 133 TO PERMIT
DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF A SKATING RINK
WITH A DJ BOOTH, CONCESSION BOOTH, AND
AMUSEMENT ARCADES, IN THE C-2 (LZGHT
COMMERCIAL) ZONE, 3840 MARTIN LUTHER KING
JR. BOULEVARD, LYNWOOOD, CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
Pursuant to law, held a public hearing on subject application;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered
all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined
that the proposal will not have a negative effect on the
environment and has therefore declared a Negative Declaration for
the project; and
WHEREAS, the project is consistent with the General Plan in
that the subject site is designated "Commercial " on the General
Plan Map; and
WHEREAS, the skating rink, DJ booth, concession booth,
amusement arcade, is located in the C-2 (Light Commercial) zone.
Now, Therefore, be it resolved that the Planning Commission
of the City of Lynwood does hereby resolve as follows:
A. That the granting of the proposed Conditional Use Permit
will not adversely affect the General Plan.
B. That the proposed location of the Conditional Use is in
accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and
the purpose of the zone in which the site is located.
C. That the proposed location of the Conditional Use and the
conditions under which it would be operated or maintained
will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
impro�r.ements in the vicinity;
D. That the proposed Conditional Use Permit will comply with
each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance
as stated in the conditions below.
E. The proposal will not have a negative effect on the
environment and a Negative Declaration has been declared.
Section 1. The following conditions of approval shall pertain to
Conditional Use Permit No. 133.
f\planning\resolution\reso2489 �
1
. � `
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
GENERAL
1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable
regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform
Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code.
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or
structure thereon, shall be first reported to the Community
Development Department , Planning Division, for review. This
Conditional Use Permit shall apply exclusively to the
subject project. i.e. roller rink.
3. The applicant, or his representative , shall sign a
Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read,
understand, and agree to the conditions stated herein before
any building permits are issued.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
4. The Redevelopment Agency will review the project prior to
granting a building permit.
5. Access to restroom facilities should be provided. Restrooms,
should be redesigned to allow separate facilities for the
project and the existing restaurant in the building. The
restrooms shall be signed and well lighted and confined to
the skating rink, adult lounge, and the existing restaurant
use at 3840 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard.
6. Loadinq/unloading adjacent the parking area for the restaurant
must be provided.
7. A signage plan must be submitted for Redevelopment Division
approval, prior to installation.
8. This application shall be subject to a yearly review by the
Redevelopment Agency.
9. The Building Division shall examine the existing bathroom
facilities to assure that they fully conform to all
applicable codes and standards.
l0. Provide security for the skating rink and building during
hours of operations.
11. Security personal shall be posted at the entrance of the ;
project, at the west parking lot, and at the south parking
area.
12. Close and block all access from the subject property onto
Ernestine Avenue, the adjacent and local street.
13. The City will initiate a"no parking zone" along the
building frontage of the project. The City will establish a
limited parlcing zone along Ernestine Avenue at Martin Luther
King, Jr. Boulevard.
14. The City's curfew ordinance (No. 1328) must be observed at
all times.
15. Business hours will be seven (7) days per week, and as !
follows:
Mondays thur Wednesdays, 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. •
Thursdays, Fridays, and SatUrdays. 2:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m.
Sundays, 12:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
During summer months, the rink may be open at 12 noon
everyday.
2
, ' � �
PLANNING DIVISION
16. This permit shall become void in one hundred twenty (120)
days, unless extended, after the use permitted has been
abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised.
17. Provide a minimum of 172 parking spaces.
18. The parking lot will serve the patrons and employees of the
existing restaurant and roller rink only.
19. Pursuant to the City's code and the attached Site Plan, each
off-street parking space shall not be less than twenty (20)
feet in length and nine (9) feet in width, exclusive of
access driveways or aisles, except as noted below:
a. Any standard parking space that is immediately adjacent to' �
a wall, structural column, light standards, or similar
obstruction on one or both of its longer sides or in an
enclosed space shall be at least ten (10') feet in width
and twenty (20') feet in length.
b. Two parking spaces designed for the handicapped shall be
provided. These spaces may be provided as follows:
1. Dimensions. The minimum dimensions of each
automobile parkinq stall for the handicapped shall be
not less than fourteen (14) feet in width by eighteen
(18) feet in length. Said stalls shall be lined to
provide a nine (9) foot parking area and a five (5)
foot loading and unloading area or;
2. Two (2) spaces may be provided within a twenty-three
(23) foot wide area, lined to provide a nine (9) foot
parking area on each side of a five (5) foot loading
and unloading area. The minimum length of each
parking space shall be e'ighteen (18) feet.
3. Location. All parking spaces for the handicapped
shall be located adjacent to the main entrance of the
facility for which the spaces are provided. The'
parking spaces shall be positioned so that the
handicapped persons shall not be required to walk or
wheel behind parked vehicles.
20. Prior to the installation, display, enlarging, modifying,
relocating or changing of signs, a permit must be obtained
from the of Community Development and required
building permits. '
21. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally
compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent
buildings. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc.
shall be installed without the prior written approval of the
Director of the Community Development Department, and
required buildinq permits obtained.
22. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in a
sanitary condition pending construction and shall be
inaintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times.
Failure to comply may result in revocation of the
Conditional Use Permit.
23. A cover sheet of approved Conditions must be attached to
plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety
Division.
24 Any violation of said conditions in this resolution may
result in revocation or modification of the Conditional Use
Permit by the issuing body at a regularly scheduled meeting.
f\planning\reso\f:2489 ,
3
, • CODE ENFORCEMENT •
25. All entries to the parking area will be properly.posted as'
per Vehicle Code, Section 22658. A letter requesting
assistance in compliance wiZl be submitted to the Lynwood
Sheriff's Station.
26. The Owner/Applicant will maintain a pro-active approach to
the elimination of graffiti from any structure, fence or
accessory building at the site. Daily inspection will be
conducted by the owner/Applicant before daily operation in
order to have any graffiti remove by 12:00 p.m. of each day.
27. Maintenance of sidewalk, parking area, gutters, parkways and
any surrounding area will be done on a daily bases. If a
maintenance service is contracted to perform the required
maintenance, a copy of the contract must be made available
at the site during the business hours of operation.
28. Trash enclosure will be built, in accordance with the
Uniform Building Code, to accommodate rubbish needs at any
time.
29. A trash enclosure shall be provided, sufficient in size, to
meet the refuse needs of the establishments. �
30. The parking area will be chained off during the non business
hours in order to prevent unauthorized parking. ,
31. The parking area will be maintained at all times either by
the owner/applicant employees or a commercial cleaning
company.
, 33. All entries to the parking lot area will be posted in
accordance with Section 22658 of the California Vehicle
Code.
;
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS
34. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk, curb & gutter and required AC
pavement along Martin Luther King Jr and Ernestine Avenue.
35. Install ten (10) 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood
standards. Seven (7) trees along Martin Luther King Jr. and
three (3) along.Ernestine Avenue .
36. Construct tree:well covers per City of Lynwood standards for
proposed street trees.
37. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass.
i
38. A ermit from the En �
p gineering Division is required for all
off-site improvements.
39. All required water meters, meters service charges and/or
fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer.
' The work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hires
' by the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from
the Public Works/Engineering Division prioY to peTforming
any work.
,
40. Developer /Owner to vacate alley south of property.
Developer/Owner to obtain alley title report and pay
vacation fee.
�
f\planning\resolution\f:reso .
� i
4
-, � FIRE DEPARTMENT • ,
41. A complete inspection, maintenance, and test of the fire
'. sprinkler system is required. This is to be performed by a
licensed sprinkler company. A fire department representative.
is to witness the test and a$70.00 fee is charge.
42. A manual fire alarm system with voice activated message and
energy power source is required.
� Alarm system including sprinkler must be monitored by a
central station.
43. The south east door is to be required exit door.
44. lighted exist signs at each exit door. ,
45. Emergency lighting to clearly light the exist ways.
46. A minimum clear width of 44 inches between the snack tables
and the rink. It is strongly recommended that the,
_ tables/seats be fixed to the floor,
47. The estimated occupant load is 414. this may be revised when
final dimensions and uses are established. A revision should
not affect existing capacity.
i
,
'
,
I
i
' I
�. f\planning\resolution\f:reso4289 � .
i
5
�
, I
_� '.. " � � ,
Section 2. A copy of this Resolution shall be de2ivered
to the applicant.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
the City Council of the City of Lynwood held on the 12th day�
October, 1993.
` AYES:
� � NOES: �
ABSENT
ABSTAIN:
Erick R. Lee, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: A�PROVED AS TO FORM: `
Sol Blumenfeld, Director Kenneth Fong
Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney
. �
. F:RESOLUTN:reso2489 � ,
. �
— i
� i
�
� �
�
�
�
. ' I
, I
�
' �
6 I
.
AGEND TEM N0. �'
'i--= .;,:a DATE: Octobc-`12, 1993 �
T0: PLANNING COMMISSION CASE N0 . �
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director � ?
Community Development Dep tment ;
,
SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment - Case No. GPA 8
Applicant: City of Lynwood
A
i
` PROPOSAL: '
The applicant is requesting approval of a General Plan Amendment
(GPA 8) from CB-1 (Commercial) to R-1 (Single Family
, Residential) in order to construct a single family home on the
north side of Louise Street, between Nichols and Gertrude Avenue,-
in the CB-1 (Commercial) zone.
FACTS:
l. Source of Authority .
Section 25-27.1 a. of the City Zoning Ordinance allows the
property owner(s) to initiate a General Plan Amendment in'
zoning boundaries and classification. �
1
2. Property Location:
The area is located.on the north side of Louise Street,
between Nichols and Gertude Avenues. (Refer to the attached
location map)
3. Propertv size: .,
The area consists of a rectangular shaped lot, approximately
6,300 square feet in size. I
4. Existinq Land Use: %
�
The property is vacant. The surrounding land uses are as �
follows: �
North - I-105 Century Freeway '
South - Single Family Residential
East - Single Family Residential `
West - Vacant
5. Land Use Designation: ;
The General Plan Designation for the subject property is
Commercial while the Zoning Classification is CB-1. The '
i
surrounding land use designations are as follows:
General Plan Zoning
North - Transportation North - PF
South - Single Family Residential South - R-1 - �
East - Single Family Residential East - R-1 i
West - Single Family Residential West - R-1 ;
6, Project Characteristics �
The present zoning classification CB-1 (Commercial) is
inconsistent with the General Plan designation of Single.
Family Residential. The General Plan Amendment would allow'
for the construction of a Single Family Residential dwelling
by Habitat for Humanity. The applicant intends to donate the,
site to the developer.
�. f:�staffrpt\gpa8 � . �
I
1 � ,
� i
' �� 7. Site Plan Re�w: •
On September 30, 1993, the Site Plan Review Committee
evaluated the proposed General Plan Amendment and recommends
approval to the Planning Commission, subject to specific
conditions and requirements.
8. Zoning Enforcement Histo�:
None of record at the time this report was prepared.
9. Public Response:
None of record at the time this report was prepared.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
1. Consistencv with General Plan
The proposed zoning classification is inconsistent with the
existing zoning classification (CB-1), and the General Plan �,
designation, Commercial. The General Plan Amendment if �
granted would allow for the residential use of the land for I
a single family dwelling thereby increasing the housing I
stock of the City. It also address one of the requirements �
of the housing elements.
2. Area Suitabilitv I
The subject area is adequate in size and shape to carry ou�
the intent of the Single Family Residential designation of I
the General Plan, and accommodate the proposed development ,
relative to the proposed density; bulk of the structures; i
parking; walls, fences; driveways, and other development I
standards required by the Zoning Ordinance.
3. Combliance with Development Standards �
The proposed General Plan Amendment would enable the i
� proposed use to be consistent with the General Plan and
meets all the development standards required by the Zoning
Ordinance regarding off-street parking; front, and rear yard I
setbacks; lot coverage, height, and required landscaping.
However, the proposed use is currently inconsistent with the �
adopted General Plan and zoning for the area. �
I
4. Comoatibility i
The proposed General Plan Amendment will be located in an
area surrounded by residential land uses. Located to the
north is I-105 Century Freeway. Properties located to the ''j
south and east are single family residential land uses, and,
to the west is a vacant lot zoned for single-family I
respectively.
5. Conditions of Approval
The General Plan Amendment and improvements proposed, �
subject to the conditions recommended by the Site Plan �
Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on the I
values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or
endanger the public health, safety or welfare. i
6. Benefits to Communitv
�
The proposed General Plan Amendment will enhance the
neighborhood and may act as a catalyst to foster other , I
quality developments.
I
I
f:\staffrpt\gpa8 ..
2 �
I
I
, .:
�.�.�
y .,
, .�� 7. Environmenta�ss_ essment •
The Community Development Department Director has detezmined,
that no substantial environment impact will result from the;
proposed General Plan Amendment; therefore, a Negative:
Declaration has been filed in the Community Development�
Department and in the Office of the City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the `
` Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2494: •
1. Approvinq resolution No. 2494 and recommending City�
Council adoption of General Plan Amendment, Case No. 8.
2. Certifying that the project will not have a
significant effect on the environment and that a
Negative Declaration has been issued pursuant to the'
provisions of State CEQA Guidelines.
ATTACHMENTS �
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
3. Resolution No. 2494
. � i
i
;
I
, I
� �f:�staffrpt\gpa8 I
�
I
,
—.
—. I
. �
a
�
�
I
- � :F �
� I
: �
�
,
�
3 i
i
�
�
_..___._.
._ _.._.... . _ _._..._. ,
�
�, .
`;
,
�OCA`�IC�N iV1AP � `
� :
� �.��,. ��..�1 ' i� 1� ' �
,i�_i��i��..i�..i..i,� � � � � �� I� � l�_ ,o
< < STR6!'T$ $ ' GORTLAND S��l� '
a w� ro .w �,� �` 'O '° '�� • •7 .J �. "`y � x �JO Jt Jo . .
. � iu 2e ir ��n �'� $ � ii �� e ias iia "°r : �° a � � �, . a� �
I � e , ' ��. �
� �� 1 � .. � ; J/
i i � �,�,� � " 1 ,.
. . . , � I I � � ��� 4 �. �j�,� \ '/ y\ ' �J � .
. ~ , � . I M �• � ��� �� � , / �, ^ �
� 1�� � 1
�_ � .IYENUf ' � +� n" � ��' � � �ar ,� � � f �7� r '
`� "� y '�
,°'�{' w $_ ��-R��Nl . .p ,c"� E-'„ .'Pe�000 �' h.�
.. � � $'� q ' ; r " _ t : . �'-`�
I � x , ^ �
.h �,� + qYt-HU ;:. ,�
iw
.. a // 6 � � W � �. � v 6 � � ''�6'� � o " . Y ���FEH'V/YDO
� . � L'J' .• 5t �� /� 0 � �ui � �, � 4 4 � � �� �� • .
a
e , � �fd 2 bB�ic� � � �/ '. A� c� G � z; ,�,T �sc .
. � ��'I�' — 50 i..... _4Gall'_ LO _ �i p �: � �� .
. . r o � x .. , .
p�. Y ♦ 4Y Q ,,.- J/ � M pj rp �,
� �
, i ' . {
�i � W � � � Sa t o .
. 8L� 0/{� 79 IB � 17 � X � 75 74 3. � SZ� S/ . G9 47 e 45�°, 4 !< '
. , e W � .� �
•�.'� .._.. .. . w 'o.,,�; $ Z_ 9' ,�"� `'" a
. �.�,w .
' . STREfT g LO!//SE
M � � N 4' c ` .� -�� ��.y ,�° tk � ,�� •`` 3 �a a 't $ ,
a �o ii � i �,`� �`� ,c� i i 2o ai si s� s� ta ' p 28 �� 3/ ;
ao [ r � (� °� (�,'� i � a
' �' ' � �'
;. ' , �
�. .
� ti IJa, /Ia /! �l� US /JQ U^ /, � /.V � NI� II . � / MI 16 'l�l J(6 W CO ISI l,5j L . . .
4 � � M q � a
. M M M M �.. � , I 1 i: •l.
,vrr�.�y.w STRfET �SEPH/NE
' o
� M °' flj $ '�' ro v' � V. a
' t/ Zp /D b /7 � L12 /J/ G70 /2y /ffi /1 /t0 /1t !tI /?.1 / t �2/ /c� RI '�I7Q 16J IiG Ip IS6 .� .
. 1� o.': v o . K .
. i°I'�,�.� a o �2
a \
' � � � � +Q,� � .t77 /[.� KN / // // // // // /1{� // / li g I( �I �' It� � 116 N � `
wZ ° ° � O. �
. � ,M � � ,; , c 11D I
AVENUE V%RC/N/A
°p � :° . � � roo c �o �. � r� 3 'i.. � � �. ,Y � �? SZ
, ;,
,.,
��
,
:,•
CASE N0. �-- , � �,
�° �.. �
��` >t: � RESOLUTION NO. 2494 •
. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD RECOMMENDING AN :
AMENDMENT TO THE LYNWOOD GENERAL PLAN
PERTAINING TO THE ZONE CHANGE ON LOT 73
OF TRACT NO. 10503 MB PAGES 158-3-4 OF
THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER OFFICE,
LOS ANGELES COUNTY, LOCATED AT 3923
LOUISE STREET, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA.
,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, .
pursuant to law, held a public hearing on the subject .
application; and '
' wHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered �
all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and ;
WHEREAS, the General Plan is inconsistent with the intent i
of the Official Zoning Ordinance in that the subject site is
classified R-1 (Single Family Residential). .
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined
that the proposal is exempt from provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15061b (3), as amended.
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of
Lynwood hereby finds and determines as follows: �
A. The current CB-1 (Commercial) zone of the subject �
site is inconsistent with the General Plan Desigination of "
Single Family Residential.
B. The subject site would accommodate proposed develop- �
ment due to its size, location, and proximity to other residen-
tial land use. .
C. The General Plan Amendment to R-1 (Single Family
' 'Residential) would be consistent with the General Plan designa-
tion of Single Family Residential.
D. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not be detri- :
mental to the properies surrounding the site.
Section 2: The Planning Commission of the City of
Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and the determi-
nations, hereby approves Zone Change Case No. 8, and recommends
City Council adoption of an ordinance changing the General Plan
from CB-1 (COmmercial) to R-1 (Single Family Residential. ,
1
�.�*+ � � .
Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to
the applicant.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1993, by members '
of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Elizabeth Dixon, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sol Blumenfeld, Director Kenneth Fong
Community Development Dept. City Attorney
�
. . f:\resolutn\reso2485 � .
2 �
,
`�� AGENd�iTEM N0._�
� �
DATE: Octobe�l2, 1993
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION CASE ItlO. ����
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director
Community Development Dep�ment ,
SUBJECT: Zone Chancre - Case No. ZC 8
Applicant: City of Lynwood
PROPOSAL:
The applicant is requesting approval of a Zone Change (ZC 7) from
CB-1 (Commercial) to R-1 (Single Family Residential) in order to,
construct a single family home on the north side of Louise�
Street,.between Nichols and Gertrude Avenue, in the CB-1.
(Commercial) zone.
' FACTS: '
1. Source of Authoritv
Section 25-27.1 a. of the City Zoning Ordinance allows the
property owner(s) to initiate a change in zoning boundaries,
and classification.
2. Propertv Location:
The area is located'on the north side of Louise Street,
between Nichols and Gertude Avenues. (Refer to the attached
location map)
3. Property size•
The area consists of a rectangular shaped lot, approximately�
6,300 square feet in size.
4. Existincr Land Use:
The property is vacate. The surrounding land uses are as
follows:
North - I-105 Century Freeway
South - Single Family Residential
East - Single Family Residential
West - Vacant
5. Land Use Desianation:
;
The General Plan Designation for the subject property is �
Commercial while the Zoning Classification is CB-1. The'
surrounding land use designations are as follows:
' General Plan Zoninq
North - Transportation North - PF '
South - Single Family Residential South - R-1
East - Single Family Residential East - R-1
, West - Single Family Residential West - R-1
_ 6. Project Characteristics °
The present zoning classification CB-1 (Commercial) is ',
inconsistent with the General Plan designation of Single
Family Residential. The zone change would allow for the
construction of a single family residential dwelling by •
: Habitat for Humanity. The applicant (the City) intends to'
donate the site to the developer.
� � � f:\staffrpt\zc8 � ' . -
1
. I
o I
. i � • .
� 7. Site Plan Review:
On September 30, 1993, the Site Plan Review Committee
evaluated the proposed zone change and recommends approval
to the Planning Commission, subject to specific conditions�
and requirements.
8. Zonina Enforcement History�
None of record at the time this report was prepared. �
9. Public Response:
None of record at the time this report was prepared.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS `
1. Consistencv with General Plan
The proposed Zone Change is inconsistent with the existing.
zoning classification (CB-1), and the General Plan'
designation, Commercial. The Zone Change if granted would� -
. allow for residential use of the land for a single family`
dwelling thereby increasing the housing stock of the City.
It also address one of the requirements of the housing
elements.
2. Area Suitabilitv i
The subject area is adequate in size and shape to carry out
the intent of the Single Family Residential designation of'
the General Plan, and accommodate the proposed development,
relative to the proposed density; bulk of the structures;
, parking; walls, fences; driveways, and other development:
standards required by tlie Zoning Ordinance.
3. Compliance with Develooment Standards
The proposed zone change would enable the proposed use to be'
consistent with the General Plan and meets all the'
development standards required by the Zoning Ordinance'
regarding off-street parking; front, and rear yard setbacks;
lot coverage, heiqht, and required landscaping. However,
the proposed use is currently inconsistent with the adopted�
General Plan and zoning for the area. ,
4. Compatibilitv
The proposed zone.change will be located in an area
surrounded by residential land uses. Located to the north
is I-105 Century Freeway. Properties located to the south
and east are single family residential land uses. And, to
' the west is a vacant lot zoned for single-family;
respectively.
: 5. Conditions of Approval �
The Zone Change and improvements proposed, subject to the
conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee,
will not have a negative effect on the values of the:
surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the`
public health, safety or welfare.
6. Benefits to Community ,
The proposed Zone Change will enhance the neighborhood and
in the City's General Plan and Redevelopment Planning. '
, f:\staffrpt\zc8 �, .
. Z
�
� '«w�" 7. Environmenta�ssessment •
The Community Development Department Director has determined
that no substantial environment impact will result from the
proposed Zone Change; therefore, a Negative Declaration has
' been filed in the Community Development Department and in
the Office of the City Clerk.
RECOMMENDATZON•
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2494:
1. Approving Resolution No. 2494 and recommending City
Council adoption of Zone Change, Case No.8.
2. Certifying that the project will not have a
significant effect on the environment and that a
Negative Declaration has been issued pursuant to the
provisions of State CEQA Guideines.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
3. Resolution No. 2494
_ :,.
f:\staffrpt\zc8 �
3
,. ,
�_ ,..._---- _.._. _�.._. _ ...___.__._._ � _...
-,,�,
r .r. . . . ....
'd F
�,OCA�'I�N iVIAP �; <<
�
� :� �:
, ;.. ,;
._I��I�»I::1',."1,.I�„I`�I,�� I I' a 1:71„I �.IJ:1..IiX1�I�l I.1 I� 6,� � � -
, � }rTY'•A� .� :, fcol r,,loo'
srAECrg g �.,::GOqTLANO
� � � ° J ,��`, , A� t � . � •�o �` � ;`� + . � .� .� wa �' xf So rt So . a .
ee
�� � �2e� it_ ��� �"� � , �� � � /ae ie3 �at .% �� a �� z .,, . s� 6�
� 8 9 q 9 -
� � ' ` I�1 ♦ � � ,../ t � 'lii:)i.
� � O 3O �/ �" � :(J ii
, 3 '� 4 /.�/,�Z � ., � a ss '� �
, ' ., , ,�,, � .
z � � �
:
� t .�ve�.vu �� � " � M a �'°; , ;�„ t,�,�� .
, � E � 5a
°+ Y � $ �--'E'i�Hr 4 � 'k h.�
� � � d'
� � 9 4 .w , — ' PACiF/ �
' . ,�" AYfNU
,' :
a� 141 w 1 ' *„ � 6� VI d , � ��
6 � i J W ' � u.. ` �� � a . � FF'VN'DOp . .
//� ry . . . � ...
A7 ay .. � 0� 67M�'� 0u ! •'�` p � ; '?D .
a r�u.7�.... �u � \ � JO
� a� C&" Z 68'i47tt'i � ]� =' A// .� � �.:�G; v Z^ 3J J!
� SO i._.� _lLK13�. :!! _ ,�� � C � �� � Vh
. r � � H ; , . . h � .
� \ o . a�+ Q i..�;.J/ � M � rv ` ,
�
� � t � o . I � , .
a Q ,:
82� d�� 79 78 � 71 �,iS � 15 74 3 �. SZ� S/ . 49 47. � 45�,° Q !<
�
'•,'' ......_. . a «'���� ° r. 2 .'Km,t�'.' �� �
,..
STRC[T g LOU/SE
� ` -
` ;d � N r � . ,� e.� -�� �; ,�i �.a�' „� �� �' , P;3 „'a. a a �
a io ii � i , N'; 6� ��� 10 ti at z.t r� ra 1 Z8 29 30 3/ ,'
� g.
!o � �r M C? f�i (�y � �> v
., �. ' �. , .� , �.
. .' . . ' • �
• n i� iF ia i i.ts qe v i�„ iav ��ii � i� wi � HT ua u� �o si tX e
r� M � °°, � � � N a ;
� �M :�� � � r
�,�.�. STREET ;/05£PNINE
° a � e o � o
R M ., ASS � "' w � '�' :'.� � � .. .
' ?/ ZO /D /! /7 � /3t /J/ /.Jt7 /?9 /af /I7 /t0 /tS QI /JJ /J2 /t/ .4�/ 11!'�170 AD Kd IQ 166 I .
1 � o.': �� ° .on
q, a o �2
.a
�� �L � q�� .o� iaA � i ii iI ii n u ik, ii i n�� i 7 :` � �u n5 i� C \ �
. �= o o C V�`: 110 I
� ,M � , o
AVENUE �/RC/N/A
. n�. .l . � � IYO C •O � M rd ^�.. � `a \_ � �' ..1 � 1 �7 �."I
, A ;
� .1
' f ' ' . �.. � ,
CASE N0. �- � ,� +:
� ��
~ � . RESOLUTION NO. 2495 •
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD RECOMMENDING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE
PERTAINING TO THE OFFICIAL ZONING ORDI-
NANCE, CHANGING THE ZONZNG ON LOT 73 OF
TRACT NO. 10503 MB PAGES 158-3-4 OF THE
LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER OFFICE, LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, LOCATED AT 3923 LOUISE
STREET, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA.
wHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
pursuant to law, held a public hearing on the subject
application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered
all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the project is inconsistent with the intent of the
General Plan in that the subject site is classified R-1 (Single
Family Residential).
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined
that the proposal is exempt from provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15061b (3), as amended.
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of
Lynwood hereby finds and determines as follows:
A. The current CB-1 (Commercial) zone of the subject
site is inconsistent with the General Plan Desigination of
Single Family Residential.
B. The subject site would accommodate proposed develop- ,
ment due to its size, location, and proximity to other residen- ,
tial land use.
C. A zone change to R-1 (Single Family Residential) would
be consistent with the General Plan designation of Single Family
Residential.
D. The proposed zone change will not be detrimental to
the properies surrounding the site.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of
Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and the determi- ,
' nations, hereby approves Zone Change Case No. 8, and recommends
City Council adoption of an ordinance changing the zoning clas-
sification from CB-1 (COmmercial) to R-1 (Single Family Residen-
tial.
1
,� ..�- � �
Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to
the applicant.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1993, by members
of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Elizabeth Dixon, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sol Blumenfeld, Director Kenneth Fong
Community Development Dept. City Attorney
� f:\resolutMreso2485
2
" �� DATE: October 1993 AGENDA�EM N0. 0
l TO:. PLANNING COMMISSION CASE N0 . ��S
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Directori�, -
' Community Development Depa�t£ment
SUBJECT: Variance Case No..25 '
Applicant: Joel Govea
Proposal• '
The applicant is requesting a variance to allow reduction of the
required lot width from fifty (50') feet to forty five (45') feet'
in order to develop a single family dwelling on a lot at 11128
Louise Avenue, in the R-3 (Multi- Family Residential) zone,
Lynwood', California.
,
Facts •
1. Source of Authoritv.
While Section 25-4.5 of the Lynwood Municipal Code regulates
development standards in all residential zones. Section 25-
26 requires that a Variance be obtained from the Planning`
Commission when, because of the special circumstances�
applicable to the property, the strict application of the
Zoning Ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyecl;
by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoninq,
classification.
2. Prooertv Location and Size
� The site is located between Elmwood Avenue and Beechwood�
Avenue, on the east side of Louise Avenue. It is rectangular
in shape, and measured, approximately 20,000 (200' x 100');
square feet in size.
3. Existing Land Use
The site contains an.existing single family dwelling with a�
two (2).car garaqe, and is surrounded by the following land,
uses:
North - Multi-Family/Single Family Residential ,
South - Multi- Family Residential `
' East - Mult-Family Residential
West - Multi-Family Residential � ..
4. Land Use Description
General Plan Zoning
North - Multi-Family Residential R-3
South - Multi-Family Residential R-3' '
East - Multi-Family Residential R-3
West - Multi-Family Residential R-3
�� f\pLanning\var\f:var25 � ' .
_ 1
i
' 5. Proiect Chara�ristics • �"
The subject property contains an existing single family-
• � dwelling and a two (2) car garage. The property is
. developed such that it has a seventeen (17') foot side yard
on its south side, and a three (3') foot side yard on its
north side. The applicant proposes to subdivide the lot into
two (2) parcels (one (1) lot 50'x 200', and the other 45'x
200') and develop a two (2) story single family residence.
The residential design calls for three (3) bedrooms, two (2)
and a half (1/2j bathrooms, and living, dining, kitchen, and,
laundry room on the first floor. The design also calls for a
detached two (2) car garage. All landscape requirements will;
. be met by the proposed plan. '
6. Site Plan Review �
At its regular meeting of September 30, 1993, the Site Plan'
Review Committee reviewed and recommended approval of the:
variance request.
7. Zonina Enforcement Historv �
None of record. � ,
8. Neiahborhood Response ,
None of record at the time of preparation of the staff
report. '
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION ,
1. Consistency with General Plan
The proposed land use is inconsistent with the existing�
zoning classification R-3 and the General Plan designation
of Multi- Family Residential. If the proposal is approved,,
the site will be underdeveloped ralative to the maximum'
density under the General Plan.
2. Site Suitabilitv ,
The property is adequate in size to accommodate the proposed
development. However, the lot is substandard and does not�
- meet current development standards relative to lot width., ,
Therefore, a variance is required for the project.
3. Com�atibilitv
The proposed project will be located in a neighborhood that.
is substantially transitioned from single-family to multi-,
family residences. Located to the north is a multi-family
residential dwelling. Properties located to the south, east,
and west are developed as multi-family residential
respectively..Thus the site will be underdeveloped relative' �
to the maximum density under the General Plan.
4. Compliance with Development Standards
Specific Findings: �
The property is a substandard lot with a hardship experienced�
that would require an exceptional privilege and does meet the
State requirements for findings of a Variance.
Staff recommends approval of the subject project variance for�
the reduction of lot width. �
2
, RECOMMENDATION • •
Staff respectfully requests that after'consideration the
Planning Commission approve the Variance request:
A. Finding that a hardship has been established that
would require a Variance for Case No. 25 as determined'
- by Section 25-26 of the City of Lynwood Zoning Code.
- B. Finding that the applicant/property owner will not
be deprived of privileges enjoyed by the owners of
, other properties in the same vicinity if Variance case
No. 25 is approved.
Attachments
_ 1. Location Map
2. Resolution No. 2492
3. Site Plan
' •
f:planning\var:var25
3
. , w
r � �. z.. , '� �., �:,-
; . ,,: � .
�` �
R"�'i q P �F . � . . ;. x
: �
k � ���T.. .. • • � y � k PyYA�� „
. ; t ,� � t "� ' Y � yr �
� � ' Y` � �� � �� ��.
� � � : , F, , � � . : �� � fTi��
, . :. „_ _ „ , -
� , . : . �
„
� ., �
1 . _ L
�
F' �' LO.CATION � , fVIAP �������� �:
�
�: . �. ,. • y ' Y , :-..
'� - ��;
� ' � ,. .�.,
,y . ,: .. 9 � � � . a � � . . , .
��_-- • �a -� \
� : �. � '�a � ' ... � � � �,
� ; .�� �� - - - , ' , � n � ! p �v �
��Sl V�^"" • LL �� . �O „�1 � , s ,
, � �� \
�.
,
a ' .,« �,� A� � ��« . �' � �' ;, �
� ' f ,'�` f '� N � I I � � r� � �3
A , ti
A4 � :�l M �. 4 , 11 1 ` �I .fj \ �. .' 000 �\\\ \ .. /,
� ., , R ...z �� k `. 12 . ��ti . ro � � � � ti � .
��� N
�i... . � ,� c� �� '; \ '- �
4 f . . . . ' . �: .
P � �
y 11 .�. �` . �t . 16��� 3 �� �i� :, • \ �.
'"� io-� 13 �L+n_:__ �� \ +� `.� ���
•- �h . � yQ� . � �. R .,r0�� � . :sn .
J .
� . :�r .- . .L•u.� . ?� �- �, .. .
r �' .-a � � . ti' � .. • . 14 •• $ �. 8 T �1 �+���� �. � \ y " \ � � i�`
, � , .... � � � i���L; i +v ' o \ V ` \ �� � .
' ' �� IT� RA ��1'� . Q , f o
a,� ,,.� „ _� q i � , �,�,�i� _ ��� \' �.�"
' T
. 0_h � ;� � ._n.w. aa� �i � `�' is v �, \ =.3c.�
` — q .,,,,F �. C� ., �� — . i� ._ �:. 8 ���o� i ..\.r �r ` � �
Y . / � .� '�'/
Z t ', � II`u . � � . � r�i� n �g K .'� . � .i. 77 ul"� . ; �tlp� :. \ � l7'" �i
p ,.�„- �r4 � ��L1� N`� n Q' e �' . �w -"77��� ![llt�� -: \'� y �.�
. r ,,, , � , o , .
� . ,�... � .� .
� $ � � g �i�NKMoP AVE � �� 8 " °' � ° eV � � � . , :•"
, , . N j:. � r .
� � Ilb�' �� �
� ,0 � � , _-- �8 ___.—uls� : 4 ���: �\ r ti
„ � . � �,,.� 2 iN.. .. 1114
i n` ' � I I W ,. � i: .
� . ` : � ,: ; : : ., � x � a ; oa. ; . ' � wr n .
m e �p inH N � ' \ �
# � ' - - --- a. �-- 24 � ��.v..
�
�=• •=1f�.� - .� �
ro�. . � y�t. „ ? .
Y�w 4' •,� 23 '`;`,. �i�. � r� .
`'` --- ,.
,,., {,, -�ut �} �
� , ,� "_�. � � m` ..5. . �!$ 22 � � �. K yy x �� � � � � N "' '• � r�r�r ti .
E � � ' • � �i . ' . ��N�� �, V� �i�+• ' �� � . u�p.. 3 . . ::
� �� ' g .�..
w� „ � �M„ ��,. 1a 8�------ � ';; ., , ,
� ro. . � inr w nyg:o
h � r Z � ) � r�
� ,� d6. $ n�•. �� /� n��� ; mi. � �� ° Jifs�
�+ � Q � . u1Ml .. _ �) I1W ' � �
Q r, � � � �,� �, . � ����� � p � ` ,o.� . j� ^ . .��w..`' � .' ,�'
. � � '11 ' � ,.
t . Il•t �� ' . . � .. . q �
�'^ � I � pp� - p n�ii 9 Pln , I M S
Y .. , .$ ',� �0 h$ ' $ �� �—.� __P •UH• . $ ?�
W ��, � � s ���J. IS� ^ ° Q �' �
ue g Q g ���„ ii S Q „�: °' °� ,x� �;
� .' ; y � ���., �
�� N �� � /� � ' ' �' � ,y1':s..�� ' mH $ �� � G ', .
�_ ,��.� �: p; � ,��•� _ $--\ � ,,,,� , �
� - r ,�,.. � : . ;
r ' $ M�i . � . ! Z � % :
� s„'a �� r
r ei I r;�---- ,��,� zl ,��� "" a ` ty
ggg ," � a ,� 8 x V„ o r ��_ � q1 I. � „ � r
� .. w� �,5 /I � w �� I �� a I n � J, fe 4 7 I� � �� n�� n r {0 � f���. �. �
�0' � p.i� N 'Q � a lIG1! I n Lu��• � � ti n a �n � i
� MA� 1� s'
a s .�.�ctiwmo� • '8 S. �ve.---•3—•
{ c , /'&. � ' 1� • n , � y"s,' lu`^ �
T !�� 4 4 se • o;' � '�'o K! � N.7/f `°.I D+w eS 1
. '� ��� i y� �� �a �� to x 4� _n,.. I��.t9a._�aaec v C t'
�.,
'� �e 8: � n,.. ���r �1 � �.,., �
cu � .� �,.
�t,�. � ' • $ �;,� $ � �a� ni, $ ...y� � � �j,�.,` i � � .. ;
i�ue � _ . . . ,
�1�� �� n.�. Q �
� u . $ �' ' ' � �, s �; ,���� �'t-- .u� ��,,, yo ` �:
„ .,
' $ n :
� Fy' . Y vii.:, f � ! � � /7 °��' � i�i:i- � i.. �p Id-� � . S � .
ni y °�
�,a^ f �u�. � 1Y.d!_ 0� . �+? :
� t �J $ taan ��7dA77 a „ 0
� $1�.� S � — — ;.,,,, ` , R �,
l „ i,e .e,�,r y ` , .
�� qn � � ^ /S uiN: O� ��OC�--r�tOROS�nro C i
� � � s;;: . a ; B .a,,. , e . �,. ea• Q $ 0 . r
,-.' . . . � � m., � _ taasi —L � •
F ir .. . � Uu. 7�'�� b �` � L$ ��i.. �.►s ��.. � . .<.�.
_____— • .- • .
"_
. .. ._ ___.. _ _ .__— .. . .. � .
� Jc /e I'.ioe. . . .� - � .. , � .
• . . . . . � . � ri
't[;� . . . , . .
s /'� �+ '•
' . . � . . � I V V � .. . , � t�.
U � ��2�,��P�1�- ��
��. �� ,CASE N0. ,
, , ; < _
� �
�e, � �>,,:,� ,^�
t: � , ��'.�.i>�� ' � , ...,, , - � . . �..; � �: � '. ' .. f . ..f;^ ;?: .'' .
.. _
,..: - .
_�;�.._..._._.__.......__..___ . ... _._..__.___. __.�,. --
, � �
RESOLUTION N0. 2492
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMI58ION
OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A
,' VARIANCE REQUEST (CASE NO. 25) TO REDUCE
THE LOT WIDTH FROM 50 FEET TO 45 FEET .
WITH AT PROPERTY THAT HAS BEEN
SUBDIVIDED AT 11128 LOUISE AVENUE IN
ORDER TO DEVELOP A SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLING, IN THE R-3 (MULTI- FAMSLY
RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
pursuant to law, held a public hearing on the subject
application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered �
all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the project is consistent with the intent of the �
, General Plan in that the subject site is classified R-3 (Multi-
Family Residential).
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined �
that the proposal is exempt from provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines, Section 15061b (3), as amended.
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of
Lynwood hereby finds and determines as follows:
' A. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement
of the specific regulatson would result in practical difficulty '
or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the '
objectives of the City Zoning Ordinance.
B. That there are exceptional or extraordinary
"circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved
which do not apply generally to other properties in the same '
zone.'
_ C. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement
of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of
privileqes enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same
zone.
. D. That the granting of the Variance as conditioned will
'. not constitute the granting of a special privilege inconsistent
with the limitations on other properties in the same zone. .
E. That the granting of the Variance will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or
materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
F. That the qranting of the Variance will not adversely .
_ affect the orderly development of the City.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of
Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and the
determinations, hereby approves Variance Case No. 25, subject to
' the following conditions:
� � . � f�:\resolutn\reso2492 . � . :
1
. � � .
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1.. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable
regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform
Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code.
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or
. structures thereon, shall be first reported to Director of '
the Community Development for review and approval.
3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments. '
4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a
Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read,
understands, and agrees to all conditions oE this approval
prior to issuance of any building permits.
PLANNING DIVISION
5. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood
main office) to establish the location of a mail box'
serving the proposed development.
6. Landscaping areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25�)
� percent of the lot area.
7. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance
with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the
.Director of Community Development prior to issuance of any
' building permits.
8. The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs
combined with ground cover as follows: One (1) five (5)
gallon shrub for each 100 square feet of landscape area; and
two (2) fifteen (15) gallon trees for each 500 square feet
of landscaped area.
9. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be
landscaped pursuant to Condition No. 8 except for necessary
walks, drives and fences.
10. No_side yard shall be less then five (5') feet.
11. Acoustical construction materials must be used throughout
the unit to mitigate freeway noise to the standards and
satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division.
12. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer
shall pay $1.65 per square foot for residential buildings
to the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to
Government Code Section 53080.
13. A.minimum two (2) car garage shall be provided for the �
proposed development.
14. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved.
15. Construction shall commence within six (6) months from date
_ of issuance of building permits.
� f:�resolutn\reso2442 � '
Z
_ �. �
16. Prior to the installation or construction of any masonry •
wa1T, the property owner shall obtain a permit for and ,
submit the following information to the Planning Division: 'i
a. Simple plot plan showing the location of the masonry
wall in relation to property lines, lengths, proposed
materials, and openinqs or gates to provide access for;
vehicles and pedestrians.
b. For masonry walls (as defined in subsection 25- �
2.1) a building permit shall be applied for in addition:
� to the plot plan described above. All masonry walls of
, any height shall meet the requirements for masonry�
construction as defined in Chapter 24 of the Unified'
Building code. A fee based on the valuation of the
proposed construction shall be paid to the Building,
Department.
c. All masonry walls shall be required to maintain '
adequate pedestrian access for the purpose of safety+
and convenience. A thirty-six (36) inch or three (3)
foot clear gate or opening shall be provided to a11
enclosures for pedestrian and wheelchair access.
Pedestrian and vehicular access shall be provided
separately.
d. All masonry walls be required to be installed with a
finished, aesthetically pleasing side facing out toward '
adjacent properties or the public right-of-way.
DESIGN
17. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective
material of either concrete tile or clay tile.
18. The residential structure shall have an exterior siding of
brick; stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar
material other than the reflective, glossy, polished and/or :
roof-formed type metal siding.
19. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the
street dedications.
20. 'All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally
compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent
, buildings. In addition, no security fences, grills etc.
shall be installed without the prior written approval of
� the,Director of Community Development.
21. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment,
swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical
devices shall be located within the rear yard or street
side yard or corner lot. Such equipment shall be screened �
from surrounding properties and streets and operated in �
accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance.
22. The owner of the site shall maintain a pro-active approach ,
to-the elimination of graffiti from the structures, fences '
and any accessory buildinq, on a daily basis. ��
23. A cover sheet of�approved Conditions must be attached to'
, plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety •
Division. .
- f:\resolutn\reso2492 �� �
3 1
.. � *
' 24. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in
sanitary condition pending construction and shall be
maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times.
Failure to comply may result in revocation of the approved
' Variance.
25. For the purpose of providing heating for any dwelling �
proposed, only an energy efficient forced air furnace shall
be used, and that the use of any wall furnace shall be '
expressly prohibited.
PUBLIC WORK/ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT •
"No Comments"
FIRE DEPARTMENT
"No Comments"
Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to
the applicant. �
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 12th day of October, T993, by
: members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: '
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Eric R. Lee, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sol Blumenfelct, Director Kenneth Fong
Community Development Director City Attorney
f\ptanning\resolution\f:reso2492 .
4
��=�:�• • AGENDA I�.M N0.
' DATE: October 12, 1993 ���^ � �`/ --� �
�
L _.�_..L
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director �
Community Development Depar ent
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10634 - CASE NO. TPM 30
Applicant: Joel Govea
PROPOSAL: '
The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map No.
10634 for the purpose of subdividing one (1) lot into two (2)
parcels at 11128 Louise Avenue, in the R-3 (Multi-Family
Residential) zone, Lynwood, CA.
FACTS
1. Source of Authoritv `
Section 25-18, et seq., Subdivision Regulations of the
Lynwood Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act,
Government Code Section 66410, et seq require that a Parcei
Map be recorded for the subdivision of parcels.
2. Property Location. ..
The property is located between Elmwood Avenue and Beechwood
Avenue, and, is approximately 20,000 (200' x 100') square
feet in size. (See attached location map)
3. Existina
The parcel contains an existing dwelling unit with a two
. (2) garage. The uses surrounding the parcel consist of the
following:
North - Multi-Family/Single Family Residential
South - Multi-Family
, � East - Multi-Family/Single Family Residential
West - , Multi-Family Residential
4. Land Use Desianation
The General Plan designation for the property is Multi--
Family Residential and the Zoning Classification is R-3.
The surrounding land use designations are as follows:
General Plan Zoning
North - Multi-Family Residential R-3
South — Multi-.Family Residential R-3 �
East - Multi- Family Residential R-3
West - Multi- Family Residential R-3
Proiect Characteristics •
The applicant proposes to subdivide one (1) lot into two �
(2) parcels to allow for the development of a two (2) story .
single family dwelling on the undeveloped parcel. The
proposed subdivision shall result in two (2) lots, one,j
approximately 11,000 square foot in size, and the other,
approximately, 9,000 square feet in size.
. 1
,
� ; � � `
6. Site Plan Review �
At its regular meeting on September 30, 1993, the Site Plan
Review Committee.recommended approval to the Planning
Commission subject to conditions and requirements. ,
Staff notes that the width of the lot shall be only 45 feet
wide which is five (5') feet less then the 50 foot minimum
width allowed by the Lynwood Municipal Code. Thus, the
Zoning Ordinance requires the applicant to file a Variance
request to address the proposed lot width.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
Environmental Assessment. �,
The Community Development Department has determined that the
project could not.have a significant effect on the
environment and is categorically exempt from the provisions
of the State CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, a Notice of
Exemption has been prepared and is on file in the Community
Development Department and the office of the City Clerk.
Staff analysis of this proposed subdivision include the
following findings: (a) Design of the proposed site; and
(b) Consistency of the proposed site with the General Plan.
Configuration Of The Proposed Site Subdivision
a. The design of the proposed subdivision shows the
proposed lots to be in character with existing sinqle
family residential developments in the area. ,
b. The proposal is intended for the subdivision of one (1)
lot into two (2) parcels in order to allow better
utilization of the property and separate ownership of
the single family structure that exist on the property. °
c. The site is physically suitable for the proposed use,
• the development is permitted by the General Plan and
Zoning Ordinance in that the parcels are substantially
flat and able to support the type of development
proposed since the existing driveway provides access td
each residential dwelling.
Consistencv Of The Site With The General Plan
, a. Staff's inspection shows that the proposed lot split
will be incompatible with the General Plan, unless a
Variance is approved to allow one lot to be 45 feet wide
rather then the required 50 feet width for a lot under
the General Plan designation of Multi-Family and zoning
classification of R-3. If the proposal is approved, the
site will be underdeveloped relative to the maximuia
density under the General Plan.
b. The size and location of the proposed project does not
significantly change the character of the existing
environment.
c. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Zoning
Classification of minimum lot sizes in the R-3 zone and
the General Plan designation of Multi- Family
Residential. �
� f:\staffrpt\tpn30 � � �
2
� � RECOMMENDATION(S1 . •
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2491.
1. Certifying that the project is Categorically Exempt from the
provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by.
Section 15061 b(3).
� 2. Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 30, subject to the stated
conditions and requirements. A
Attachments:
1. Location Map
• 2. Resolution No. 2491
3. Tentative Parcel Map No. 1-0634
�
t:\planning\staffrpt\tpn30 � �'
3
�
� �: z. _ • . : • �
t
- ' ...
�. ' ,
.f _ . � .. ., ,
K
� � ,:. ` `� LOCATION iVIAP
;�� , ; �
:� ; z l : ,
� �t .�• ,���_ � .., °°--' "a { Jf � � � \\
� N ;N N . . �� � ��"� ' w \ . \ .
aR-�`( '. BORSIX�Y � � 10 ,,.+ � �\
� av� � �
a �r .., � �.. J �"" �
s � � J — ��''°'=' n'� R II � \\� +\\\�' \
,.�=,',� �� mi� .i ,�p \ . � \� \.
�/� N
� � � . . q ,.... �� R . �C_Y,�p' � t0 � O F , ' \
� l � �' . ..,. I Z v — \ �
' ,�.... s 4 q �- \� � } \
� °.� ' v_ '' � ib,� _ — �_ J . � \
y i ' ii.� 13 � ` � �L+_ � .,. �
..�Y. SQ. �er
� � •. , -' ' . . . .:, . R �7 8 � _ ?� �;. .
�,„ �� n� 14 $. @ � � b� ,,, " w ,.. \ 'y �
$ +� ..... q y � .
�. � .u• . S!• ' � e�. r�Yoo '�"��'�. ' NF 1,\ f \ �d. �
e � .. ."W 7 I i ., 8 n•• � ,'. s �t�;y \ �� . \\
,.} n«• ' Q, ' n� I Iw� 11CS� 1\:� %
'� 5 ' � ..w� �. � '� "' _ ' !f ' ." � 1�% �/ \ � . .
F 4 . ,.-.-. �� . II u /.����� � � \
- ��•• q� ., I �I � 16' ,� I,.., � R . : i 77 „��� ���p .y�- C)
: 4 ���� N r . � , �w �– or��' � \� Z Q
^ '� lil,� \.
� �/ . �I��MO � .[�� 3 ''0
s " g � g ' G,I.F�WmOD A✓E S . � . �T " � \
� ' ni.. �
; fl 40 ,.,.. : � I � � -- �I 76 —c!_ ` pl4 \ � ..
� il p .2 � u�.. --r----- �iw ,
g � � ���M �i r �
� Q. � � 2 Q IIII• ��� �'� ..
� � _�� � 11 � . � ._
, � • _,g ur � B 70 nn � M
, � � -- 24 ! � �..
r ���1 � i �e-IP �,.
� �+. ,���� ��a. � . 1Na� � tln. � �
�r ; , , r,u� � 4 • � 23 ' , „ q , -----nL � �
��. J '"" , , i 22 ���� � , xn,. �r �r �
', .. � `i—_• O 5� �R: n ��. � . , rxvsn
� , ' ��p. y � „„� � .����o � ��m.. 3
,� „ g 8 �.. . _ n ,
�; ,s=., ur � I .N„ ��,. 73 8r---- ., „,)` �
fi ° . , � 20 — - � � � ,. �t �ii� � w � I _. „�,
° I
d6 � .in•. d o �� ��,.� ��,:. � o ��rsa
5� M Y �{----
,�w �
,
iK g o � 3 � y;;,., .� ,,,., ,� M
K ♦ .. ti ����L - .� ' � ,
. � � ����r� I .� b i ; I
p � P11t , 1 �
s bI$ N �� ��. ti8 ` � . � 0 _��—�__—��i � �Ilr�
, 1111 Q Y
� � B! 8 j � uis. - q , � �. �O �. � e $ �„J. �� �u��� � ���—�'
M
. � Q � �� � � � � ' �n�i � i
����t
' �_ � h ni.� /1 �'� � � , �w� � � ��„� 8 �' I
; �. . . 7d �uTr ar — \ � �.. w� , t ..
e� � �1, � & � g �a.,� � � .a � lo ro Riv'r.. iov � � ` � -
s ,,, i �� �r -� — a,�,.� r� x
71 I m a 1 �
� w � �bti /t i +. ^$ g l � h I «�r �J so ���' - "q� I�NA� r r ♦ Z. ��o .y
. .Op� � i0 L ��.�• N ''3 llGff li n �� 5 �� i �.• � I n n ,n ��'i {0 ' �'
. . rxn y ,./ a � .. .
$ ° ��-�7lryoo�p .'$ �S v ., .A✓f.._'^.o Y- ��Zio
�� Y � .: � M r+ � 5
. j� a r IIi. so .s � � y • 1 s� K! � d.1/S I�� �°.� liiea �5 1
� v��� / . I^ v � �, 70 I� y� �,', A�.e . I 6J f-lug �
♦ .�,'. ' a — �.iei 1 � ��aai e (�C �
�e 8 0 �. � ��,.. $ io & iu i ���
� � ; � /! n�,� " � �ine 'I � �
,,,,, � �
s ��_.., � .1 . p. {ii�.� rt O /d 4i�. $ ���_'`L..�.�_ _4 . Q
i ,� !�� ur� ' nu� 4�1 `�1 �I:�.`
ri � x � � . coaeu �l:i� 4 1
� y .: , .' � $ �ui S � O /� � C i�lii � � . /N Pin e �.�,�
. Nu. �! �) ,�,» b 8 u,.. � I� iso�nn^ %
� ��i�• `.; ,�/Q ,�a»' � � — �n — p
, � $ in,.. s — — . i,,., @ r ..
> � �na ne .o.�Jr ^ `
k 'T� . . � . �� , $ �„ .� 6 B h . is ,f;;;: �, e - ioa� roaoz o �` .
�,., r
, .,� ad• „ �Q
� � � $ . o � i�:., o _ roo.si —L----- . � :
s. >? � I � 0,.. �; a� e /a v eoo.,e ,,.« '
------L „�,. �— _ : — .
� - __.- --- - - -
--- .
� f�e�� , :;�� - -- -
. �z.-, .�_
� „ , ,;
� � � � I �5 U� P25� �P�1
; a . CASE N0. ,
,
� .�x.x - • . .
. � �
RESOLUTION NO. 2491
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.
10634 TO SUBDIVIDE ONE (1) LOT INTO
TWO (2) PARCELS. BEING A SUBDIVISION
OF LOT 74 TAX LOT 21, TRACT NO. 10634
OR BOOK 6194-27 OF MAPS IN RECORDS OF
THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES.
' WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject
application; and .
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has
`determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the
State CEQA Guidelines, as amended; and '
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully
' considered all pertinent testimony offered in the case as
` presented at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the preparation, filing and recordation of a
Parcel Map is required for development; and
Section 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find and'
determine that said Tentative Parcel Map No. 10634 in the R-3:
(Multi-Family Residential) zone, should be approved for the
following reasons:
A. The subdivision meets all the applicable requirements '
and conditions imposed by the State Subdivision Map
Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the Lynwood
Municipal Code. ,
B. The proposed subdivision of lots is consistent with
the applicable elements of the General Plan and the
Official Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lynwood. ,
C. Proper and reasonable provisions have been made for
adequate ingress and egress to the subdivision of the
lot. ' � ` ',
D. Proper and adequate provisions have been made for all
public utilities and public services, including
sewers. j
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of-
Lynwood hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 10634 in the R-3
(Multi-Family Residential) zone, subject to the following
conditions.
v,
� I
,
' I
_ ' " . ... -� . . . I
I
I
i
� f:\resoWtion\reso2491 �.
1
� ' � � ' .
COMM[TNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City ;
Departments.
2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign, a�
Statement of Acceptance stating that he has read,
understands, and agrees to the conditions imposed by the
Planning Commission, before any building permits are
issued. ,
PLANNING DIVISION
3: Within twenty-four (24) months after approval or.
conditional approval of Tentative Parcel Map, the,
subdivider shall file with the City of Lynwood, a
Final Map in substantial conditionally approved, and in
conformance with the Subdivision. Map Act and the
Subdivision Regulations of the Ci'ty of Lynwood.
4. No_grading permit or building permit shall be issued prior
to recordation of final map or another appropriate
instrument approved by the City of Lynwood, a Final Map as'
approved or conditionally approved, and in conformance
with the Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision
Regulations of the City of Lynwood. ,_
, 5. Extension of the Tentative Map approval shall only
be considered if the applicant or his/her
representative, submits a written request for extension
to the Community Development Department stating the reasons
for the request, at least thirty (30) days before map .
approval is due to expire, pursuant to, and in compliance
with, Section 25-18, of the subdivision regulations of the
City.of Lynwood.
6. The Final Parcel Map shall be filed with the City Engineer '
' of the City of Lynwood.
Z. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in
sanitary condition upon approval of the Tentative Parcel
Map and pending construction of the proposed addition,
and shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner at'
all times. - ,
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING
8. All,conditions of the State Map Act and the City':s
subdivision Ordinance must be met prior to recordation.
All matters and improvements shall be consistent with the=
ordinance, standards, and procedures of the City's
Development Standards, Engineering Procedures and Standards,
Water Standards, and,Planting Standards of the Department of
Parks and Recreation.
�
The Developer is responsible for checking with staff for,
clarification of these requirements.
9. Submit a Subdivision Guarantee to this office.
� The Final Map shall be based on a field survey. All�
surveying for the proposed development will be done by the
Developer, including the establishment of centerline ties: �
Enclose with the final map the.surveyor's closure sheets. �
. � f:\resolutn\reso2491
Z
� �
10. Developer shall pav all apolicable development fees
including drainaae, sewer, water and parkway trees prior to
, issuance of any buildinc�permits. �
Pay Parcel Map checking fees prior to checkincr.
Pav 5100' monument checkina fee Arior to recordation.
Deoosit S50 with City Engineer to cruarantee receipt bv Citv
of recorded, reproducible mvlar, parcel map prior to
- recordation.
All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection
fees are to be paid prior to recording the Final Map. All
requirements to the serving utilities to be met or guarantee
prior to recording of the Final Map.
11. Gradinci and Draininq
A grading plan signed by a registered Civi1 Engineer shall'
be submitted for the approval of the Director of Public
Works/City' Engineer and the Director of Community
Development. The grading plan shall include the topography
of all contiguous properties and streets and shall provide
for the methods of drainage in accordance with all
applicable City standards. Retaining walls and other
protective measures may be required. Offsite drainage
easements may be necessary. The structural section of all
parking areas shall be designed by a Civil Engineer based
upon soils analysis supplied by a recognized and approved
soils engineering firm. The structural section shall be
approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. In �
the event that the design is not provided,.the minimum
structural section that will be approved by the Director of
Public Works/City Engineer would be 2 inches of asphalt on 4
' inches on untreated rock base.
12. Sewers
The development shall be provided with public sewers.'
Connect to public sewer. Provide laterals as necessary:
Design of all sanitary sewers shall be approved by the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
. ;
13. Water Systems
The Developer sha11 construct a water system including water „
services, fire hydrants and appurtenances through the
development as required by the Director of Public Works/City
Engineer. The Developer shall submit a water system plan to '
the City of Lynwood Fire Department for fire hydrant .
'locations. The City will install water meters only.
Payment for said meters shall be made to the City prior to
- issuance of building permits. The Developer shall instalT:
on-site water facilities including stubs for water meters
and fire hydrants on interior and on boundary arterial
streets.
A1T'conditions of the Lynwood Fire Department must be met
prior to recordation. ,
14. Dust Control & Pedestrian Safetv
Prior to the issuance of demolition or grading permits, the
developer shall:
a. Submit a plan indicating safety methods to be provided .
to maintain safe pedestrian ways around all areas of
construction. This may require proper and adequate.
� signs, fences, barricades, or other approved control
•. devices as required by the Director of Community
. Development.
� � f?\resolutn\reso2491 '
3
,.. � � ;
15. The Developer shall install all public improvements, as
required by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer rior
to issuance of anv occupancy permits for this development.'
Public Improvements shall include but are not limited to:
a. Construct new drive approach and required pavement
along Louise Avenue.
b. Reconstruct damaged curb and gutter and required
pavement along Louise Avenue.
Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be
delivered to the applicant.
• APPROVED and ADOPTED this ______ day of _________,'
1993, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES: .
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Eric R. Lee, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sol Blumenfeld , Kenneth Fong
Community Develbpmerit Department City Attorney ,
' .
` . - f:�resoWtn:reso2497 �
4
�''�--" DATE: Octob �g92 AG�;.�DA ITEM NO.�_
� TO: ' PLANNING COMMISSION CASE IYO. ��
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director��...,
Community Development Depain°ment '
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 135
Applicant: Joel Govea �
PROPOSAL•
The applicant i's requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit
to develop a single family dwelling at 11128 Louise Avenue in the
R-3 (multi-Family.Residential) zone. �
FACTS:
1. Source of Authoritv
Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that a
Conditional Use Permit be obtained for any residential�
development in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone.
2. Propertv-Location:
The site is located on the eas,t side of Louise Avenue
between Beechwood Avenue and Wriqht Road (Refer to the
attached location map).
3. Propertv size:
The subject site consists of a rectangular shaped lot
approximately 9,000 square feet in size (45' x 200').
4. Existing Land Use:
The property is currently vacant. The surrounding land uses
are as follows:
North - I-105 Century Freeway
South - Vacant '
East - Vacant
West - Single Family Residential
5. Land Use Desianation:
The General Plan Designation for the subject property is:
Multi-Family Residential while the Zoning Classification is
R-3. The surrounding land use designations are as follows: �
General Plan Zoning ,
North - Multi-Family Residential North - R-3
South - Multi-Family Residential South - R-3
East - Multi-Family Residential East - R-3
West - Multi-Family Residential West - R-3
�
;
,
, � f:�staffrpt\cup135 ,..
1
� ' 6. Proiect Char�eristics: •
The applicant proposes to develop a two (2) story
residential dwelling with living, kitchen, laundry and 1/2 '
bath on the first floor, three (3) bedrooms two (2) full
baths on the second floor and a detached two (2) car garage.
Approximately sixty (60%) percent of the site is designated
for landscaping.
,
7. Site Plan Review:
At a special meeting on September 30, 1993, the Site Plan
Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and
recommended approval to the Planning Commission subject to
specific conditions and requirements.
8. Zonina Enforcement Historv: '
None of record.
9. Public Response:
None of record at the time this report was prepared.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION:
1. Consistencv with General Plan
The proposed land use is consistent with the .existing zoning
classification (R-3) and the General Plan designation
multi-family residential. Therefore, granting Conditional
Use Permit No. 135, will not adversely affect the General
Plan. .
2. Site Suitabilitv
The subject property is adequate in size and shape to.
accommodate the proposed development relative to the
proposed density; bulk of the structures; parking; walls,
• fences; driveways, and other development features required
by the Zoning ordinance. Furthermore, the subject `property
is adequately served with the required public utilities and
offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility.
3. Comoatibility i
�
The proposed project will be located in a neighborhood that
is substantially'transitioned from single-family to multi-
family residences. Located to the north is a multi-family
residential dwelling. Properties located to the south,
east, and west are developed as multi-family residential
respectively. Thus the site will be underdeveloped relative
to the maximum density under the General Plan. i
I
' 4. Conditions of Apnroval �
I
i
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions +
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have '
a negative effect on the values of the surrounding
properties or interfere with or endanger the public health,. i
safety or welfare. ',
5. Conditions of ApAroval * I
The improvements proposed, subject to conditions recommended I
by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative' +
effect on the values of the surrounding properties or I
interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or � ,
welfare. .
I
f:\staffrpt\cup135 i
�
Z �
I
I
� �.
LOCATION MAP
�-- -�.-,- u- .� g ��_ z r� � \ ' .
° �#r°�� a „ , p _ — � •- a a °� � �
� ,^ � & r11 ,i ' I N \
S8 '_�� '�, � 10 'Fa- \ \\\ \\
.. ��, h. �11 . � I1 � \ - \ . ,
� ��' " �� •$ � '\�\�
8 O e \
'- i R suaa_. e ��,.�, 4 .i ,� �� `op G \ .
., ..... � ?i�p , ao . 2 \ � , ��\\ \
. � R R 12 P �. � o�
-.- q. .wo � n �' ��, i >- \ .
_�r� ,..,. �.. $ 13 � • Q : � �'- �_ v \�" \\ ...
_ U.�. � — � ^_ _ _ c\ i .n
. .,. � ° �1�. T n
r. . ' p I N lt •i J \
_ �4 Y � 1 ^� inlr iOfµ \
.... n0�� .n - 'up y.�� \
�, e.• �w �`� �' HL K)J���/�A �
� m m w q �p,a I iA � \ �
- ...� :. ,".� � • I �-_-�11._ / riors g i:t�ey \ m \
.. Of� '� � .�.w 1�e.� �`1 V � \ \
�— y� ....F' �,. e :� � —r h _'_...'Q____- $ �`\�� t
....� .�• I 7) n �' . / �d� �
�� �� � Q" : I ;I " 16 � �.�, R „ - \ ,�
' r� ��f N� C �°+ IFQa� ioo � PLSt__ v'i�'�� Z
. • h n �d0---r n��+ is 5� O
�� \ - R� � AV£ $ ' n=•.�eo ^I re t ..<.. S re� '
� � i � � i �t ' ni.. R I 76 _L'}_ � �"` \ I
�,�� a v Q i , a i� �'' ----j----- ul4 �
i. � � �� g a j� :2 n�w �Iln ) riv � ...
1 A 2 .Q� I I 2$ n � w � � ii,�. . ,� .. _,
u•.
� ii.. � ��r � 78 �in� �: $�
' ----� iQ pq ,2. �
� nx o -17 0 � � " � .. .
i
� p�i� . .
�e�. ' dn. � �
;._.,,,, � 4 23 . �,. -----'���� ti �
4+
� �,. o "'" 5 R�a. 22 ���., � H�,. � w ,.�1�
' S� nh ,� �v" � ,,���e � ,,,n• 3
, �. ,
.. I � 8' 8 �un� �n.a y3 �F ------ � �w, c
47 b . 20 .o � �S �ur ,e • ' � v ��e�._ ;
r
` g ,. �� ,,,., - ,,,:. I � ,,,..
� in•. d F $ ,,., 8 �� �uu I
; ; . ` �_-_—_
' � " � � � 3 9 . /d ni• '. S ,,,., io ,,: �
' let $ ,o� �a'� p �. � �,,.�-�;� � $ u�n — �1----��u� � � ` iu ,. i
J . n c g � '. � j o �.r. I np � I'
; 'dd g � � iiis� // P�� � �. ^ � ~ � ��.s ~ � T �K��� I
� _ Q " � � �i�.� �
� Q/Q $ 8__ .. Zp ���., 8 1
� �_ � `~^ p�.. / � � 1 To nT! P - � '�-�_ _ MI ���� � ` . �
i e� $ � /J � ' � � � �i�.�� � d ,��� b �-AC��TM k �
� r n g� I: Vf ��--,_' � uyi 7� I Q� I. I� a + �
' � �� /I � L��I I N I u"i I� �J,, f0 �� 7� ,� � T � A I n?� � ���< � t���ue .�
i� !p �(O � p.�. N lMff . li n a ti �in. � �^ �
nn p�
�Q 'r0 ' �i r � AVf._'_'�-" ��}ae � �...
� M �5 + ,
` � a 8 � �4 ♦ " !7 ,!! o iiea 5`' � � ' � �
; � ir � 4� tit .s I I. ���i uf d.2if I �.I I )
!! . '. / i��. I $; 9 10 ' 0+� oi.. $� � �1�_�.!lLEL C � . (
i � �,. �} N e i .ioi -� � �.:e� ; ��
i �E $ o .' ` i I o n � uo $ iu zoia �•ii.•= I
r Z b /1 p�.� ; uLO � '� ,R § ' I
i . „i�� Q
, ---- c
+ � y i�9�+ �;Z 0 /C ��v. $ � ui�! ��"__ � 1 - \ � . I
� ur� �
l oaas :QasS.r ��::�
i �i �u� � O 1� /7 �I.a � ui3o .Y � IN r :t , o �i . I
$ i : � e �,:�i
u,�. � �.� • � �
r �,,.. S` t �a S _�, � n—�—�-r�a� „��, R o i
s � ,,, r
-'—"'-- " -- �,e .o,�,r o p
,� $ �i�,, e B 1� is ,i;:;; . �°o -ToasT— ad• ma�: .$ QQ �.
i �� �
) a . • . .�14 e � . �
; _ roasi ' ��
a �r.., -�-----�
� 'i e n,.. �;a '° ---"—L-s „�.. �.,s ,,. �_-- '
� - --- --- - — - i
I � �
r<ai� .�.�oo
,
i
;
1
� 25 P�1 �
� CASE N0. �U� I�S, ��� ,T 3
;
;. ,
__ . _ _ , .___.
. RESOLUTION N0. 2493 •
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 135 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO
(2) STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH DETACH
TWO (2) GARAGE, AT 11128 LOUISE AVENUE IN THE
R-3 (MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYN-
WOOD, CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law,
conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent
testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined -
that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA•
Guidelines Section 15061 b(3), as amended; and
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for
development in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone.
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines as follows:
A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and I
shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls',
landscapinq, driveways and other development features
required by the Official Zoninq Ordinance.
B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions,
will not have a negative effect on the values of
surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger .�
the public, health, safety, or welfare. I
C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current I
. zoning regulations and site plan submitted and approved �
by the Site Plan Review Committee. �
I
D. The qranting of the Conditional Use Permit will not
adversely affect the General Plan.
E. The proposed development will add favorably to the �
housinq stock and will provide additional affordable i
priced hausing in concert with the policies of the I
Housing Element of the General Plan. I
F. The proposed development will esthetically upgrade the� �
area and will act as a catalyst in fostering other
quality developments.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, I
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby
approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 135, provided the fol-
lowing conditions are observed and complied with at all times.
I
!
�
�
. i
j
I
f:\resolution\reso2493 I
i
• 1 I
�
� . � �
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable
regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform
Building Code and the Fire Code and be in substantial
compliance with plans on file with the Community Development
Department.
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or
structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community
Development Department, Planning Division, for review of
said Conditional Use Permit.
3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments.
4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a
, Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read,
understands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution
prior to issuance of any building permits.
PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS
5. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood
main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving
the proposed development.
6. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one
hundred and twenty (120) days after the use permitted has
been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised.
7. Construction shall commence within (6) months from date
of issuance of building permits.
8. Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25�)
percent of the lot area.
9. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance
with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the
Community Development Director prior to issuance of any
building permits.
The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs
combined with ground cover as follows: One (1) five (5)
qallon shrub for each 100 square feet of landscaped area; (
and two (2) fifteen gallon trees for each 500 square feet of
landscaped areas.
10. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped
and shall consist predominately of plant materials except
for necessary walks, drives and fences. �
11. A minimum of two (2) car garage is required for this I
project. I
12. A six (6') foot high block all shall be installed along the I
perimeter of the property, except within the twenty (20')
foot front yard setback. In this frontage, if built, the
wall shall not exceed a height of three (3') feet measured I
from top of curb.
13. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet.
14. Fina1 building elevations, including materials of �
construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the " i
Building Official and the Planning Division prior to �
issuance of any building permits. �
f:\resolution\reso2493 I
(
2 �
I
15. Before any b�lding permits shall be is•ed, the developer
shall pay $2.65 per square foot for residential buildings to
the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government
Code Section 53080.
16. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved.
17.. Acoustical construction materials shall be used throughout ,
the units to mitigate freeway noise to the standards and
satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division.
18. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective material
of either concrete tile or clay tile.
19. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of
brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar
material other than the reflective glossy, polished and/or
rolled-formed type metal siding.
20. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the
street dedications.
21. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the
exterior elevation of the building must be approved by the
Director of Community Development.
22. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in
a consistent manner, includinq the incorporation within the
side and rear building elevations of same or all of the
design elements used for the primary (front) facades.
23. That the applicant submit elevation drawings to the Planning
Division showing the exterior building design; including the
specification of colors, and materials.
24. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally
compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent
building. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc.
, shall be installed without the prior written approval of the
Director of Community Development.
25. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment, (
swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical
devices shall be located within the rear yard or street.
Such equipment shall be screened from surrounding properties
and streets and so operated that they do not disturb the
peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring residents, in �
accordande�witH the City's Noise Ordinance. I
26. The vacant lot shall be cleaned and maintained in sanitary
condition pending construction and shall be maintained in a
neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure to comply may
result in revocation of the Conditional Use Permit.
27. A cover sheet of approved conditions must be attached to
plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety
Division.
28. The property owner will maintain a pro-active approach to �
the elimination of graffiti from the structures, fences and I
an accessory building, on a daily basis. �
29. For the purpose of providing heating for any dwelling P � I
proposed, only an energy efficient forced air furnace shall �
be used, and that the use of any wall furnace shall be
expressly prohibited. '
. I
�
f:\resolutn\reso2493 ��
I
3 �
I
I
I
~ �BLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEP�TMENT
30. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered
Civil Engineer. Property is located within 100 year flood
level zone per flood boundary map. Foundation pad should be
1 foot higher than flood elevation.
31. Reconstruct curb and 24" wide gutter and asphalt pavement
along property frontage on Louise Avenue.
32. Construct a new drive approach per City standards along
Louise Avenue.
33. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected
separately. Construct laterals as necessary.
34. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass.
35. Underground all utilities.
36. A permit from the engineering Division is required for all
off-site improvements.
37. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire
protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The
work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by
the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the
Public works/Engineering Division prior to performing any
work.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
No Comment
�
, I
I
I
I
I
. �
.. �
i
�
�
I
�
f:\resolutian\reso2493 �
4 �
I
I
`� ' � AGEND�RI`EM N0.
DATE: October 12, 1993 �,�J� N�, 3T .
L
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 134
Applicant: David Herrera
Pr000sal•
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit in order to
• develop an addition to existing auto body and fender shop at
10840 Long Beach Boulevard in the C-2A (Medium Commercial) zone.
Facts•
1. Source of Authoritv
I
Section 25-16.15 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that
a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to operate any
business with respect to automobile uses. �
2. Property Location
The subject property consists of a regular shaped lot on the
East side of Long Beach Blvd. between Elizabeth Street.and
Alma Avenue (See attached Location Map).
3. Propertv Size
The subject property is approximately 16,800 square feet in
size.
4. Existing Land Use
The subject site contains an existing body and fender shop.
The surrounding land uses are as follows:
North-Commercial East-Residential
South-COmmercial West-Commercial
5. Land Use De'scription
General Plan• Zonina•
North- Commercial North- C-2A
South- Commercial South- C-2A
East- Residential East- R-3
West- Commercail West- C-2A
, 6. Proiect Characteristics
The applicant proposes to renovate an existing an automotive
body and fender work shop and constuct a two story structure
with 2,288 square feet on the first floor and 728 square '
feet for office space on the second floor. The operation will
contain an office, a bathroom, and a work area. The proposal
require twenty-five parking spaces . Approximately, seven �
(7%) percent of the site is designated for landscaping.
t:\staffrpi\cup734 ,
1
/
%
,� , � �
7. Site Plan Review
At its regular meeting on September 30, 1993, the Site Plan
Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and
recommended a denial to the Planning Commission.
8. Zonina Enforcement History
None of record.
9. Public Response
None of record at the time this report was prepared.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION:
1. Consistencv with General Plan
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning
classification (C-2A) Medium Commercial and General Plan
designation of Commercial. Therefore, granting Conditional
Use Permit No. 134 will not adversely affect the General
Plan. �
�
2. Site Suitabilitv I
The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
proposed development relative to structures, parking, walls',
fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features
required by the Zoning Ordinance.
3. Compatibility
The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of
commercial developments; therefore, the project will be
compatible with the surrounding land uses. However,
residential uses are to the east of the proposed use.
4. Compliance with Development Standards
The proposal meets the development standards required by the �
Zoning Ordinance with respect to setbacks; lot coverage;
building height and density.
5. Benefits to Communitv �
The proposal will not assist in upgrading the commercial use �
of the property and support the Commercial intent of the �
General Plan. I
6. Environmental Assessment
The Community Development Department Staff has determined
that the project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section
15061 b(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality
Act of 1989 as amended.
RECOMMENDATION:
I
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning i
Commission deny this request.
ATTACHMENTS• �
i
1. Location Map . �
2. Resolution 2490 I
3. Site Plan
4. Concept Plan �
f:\staffrpi\cup134 I �
(
2
I
�
, � �
LOCATION iVIAP ,�
`p�q� '� ; * r • �., �.'.,:. f. t :• ��•'...' '1�.� J 1z�+. ..
J. � T��. 3�, M!. : ;: ; , : -.:. .'' P� v� 1 ��n .. ... :�,� t
I M h � � Y �
Q Ml ��• �/GS '.. A1 � SA07 ^( ro/02 � /0l /00 „�r �d . ♦ Y ry ,ry N . .
71 U� � 7 m n' M " I I � \
ll Q u , pp N�.� �o.' w�90 1° �° y N
�. S' lne '. • • {o IO � $ '
� m b., � 40 �a �� ' im $���
4 �� '� ss °° "f . i�S n w a� �a.f 4 Y �? � C ��^ 7t .
M � �^ y h ♦' M � 1 �I �
� ���i�i �e A � � n �i ^� m � "� ,^� m m �,� � o, , �m o � � � so 1
i ��(+y'0 � ,
pTY BW�'OARY $
/ f . a0 �� �I
� s� ra - n si 71
so � b � ru��, ��'lod �� re � a, � p � I �� � r6 �p �b i� 4
l ' ' 10�I � 7M M , O Mt ro11. p21 C� �H ry� p
� j..�rova3 �° i _ �D�d� , I , M M�� M I �n i M M n' I'� .
2 N h � � �
: , �iov e �d71� _ �p
t � �
. �10)dDA • � � p iJjLg I I K
' 0 � 107) � � // J I � 4
. : . o ,p _ ..2 _ _ � % If W1 M Q! � f� I � M !D � M M ,
I // � o �D)i9 7 \ M I m M M M�� S (�- � M
' 07 0�1 ' Y O � y I`J I M M�"' tv� M� M N�. 1� I e S
•�a7 Gw � �� �� ` u a ss s� sc �Z. s�
� ' 10�33 ,�� r[.M,r . .
./o7,4d,6 I� Of '�. l Q� /O6
� Q / � I It !2 l2 57 I S! � Si ...
•1e�4 M � 1JJY9 , r~ 8 �Jp i� ^ �7 ������.""" U � '` �w I� I � M i M M � I
� �'� .1. I �D'� .M II �yaM I IQ MI) M MI!
.io�5ozo •� r s a!�oB ., I I �
ii� I I �
s io I fi�r �c '•. �
•�o� u � u4 i -
- z] z7lr °f �� j� I o �sf�� �
� ♦ 7/ � � ' � I;O q. n � � ^ 11 I I ,
�.y � asi �c . � � p 1 /08/� ab � m
' �� zs_ � lr'� . 1°fritii• I�-� M �o. M�`..u��� �I
�d n M �� 6 l
2 z .'A ow:ro iru ro8r9 i��f 'n°�Im°�n 1 .�.� y� : ::I
zeie�7o. �o�d/ rlo9 M I ry I MI `°�ImIM r
I➢ I
. 7 JO — J ��- —�-- S]/ JL 5� 53� S �/ ]0 S. '
�/ �. �
' ' `^ CL/ZABETN -: I
: _ _ . - �t -- � � < � __'
'� 3 N• y�/O)�� �I. , $ 1 f� � J N S� SO 3G 37 J7
i . ss JI ie y'. v lo! 3� 1 I rG �. I �I
� JJ f07 • .1 `b �p O U � � ,��, (`'� a ,k Lfj� �I
t'
� ��.���, «.�?.�:T... . r ' 4 �� ro MP M , � I
i n I . I'T I /ODS/ `� I I M I I
� ^ iu 1� y � /
i
' � PLUMA �,� AY£N(/£ ,�.. g ` / /00
if �
' a MI � �„��� I I,., ti`� ��09�� I '� e � ^�
� '' 3 u •-sO '� n :�+
� o u � I .ro �:.�� i O vM a+,`�c6�� � �� �
� . J 1 < . � � ' ` i M r.�r v ��Ly � `
I
; s. � � a � � I � I -� 3 � �., ��� M M M M , ... �. I
: .e .. 1 J ,� � S � �� l o� �j c ^ � n, i
; �•� 7 � M Y v� .� I�k 1 � 2/ 1'..(e� �. S!!S SiP� b 91
: �� ' � s ;I
1 � et�s � � w m w
; JM'�J'f. . ^ . . ' j � � � f'Q 4 I A
� � n T � , .. h . " � � � � L �. � � o � .
. • .. vy�h � (f1 M Vl M
� ` m /�?J 4 S G 2! 9J0 / � 3 6 W �� � 2� t1 M� M(+7a� I
� n �gn ie � � o ti ��° - �
i ' ` I A" y ' � �� � ` h „+ � 'a m � $ � I I
i .I� ��.�. .� - . .. .
` . . . . aRive ; a
Q � � ua
) . e ... . ' V° I I O� W 7t � :' +
1 ^ O , � � � � J ` �
� ' ` ` � ^, M I y m Ir � .
^ i s e ie � s i� i �e � � p .,' m �
, es e� u a� co v�se�s al 1.� s1 i y, Ze M� I n
j } I ' �_ , �. 75 ..� .. � M� � n I
� ;-:: I
1 , Jc,�e i'.ioo' . , . . :..I
� i
� I
? :; �
; C }� � f'
; CASE N0. � I , ,
. �
. _ _--_. _ . . ..._.�._._____
�
' ' � �
RESOLUTION N0. 2490
A RESOLUTION OF TAE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
APPROVING CONDITZONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 134 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND
OPERATION OF AN AUTO BODY AND
FENDER REPAIR CENTER IN THE C-2A
(MEDIUM COMMERCIAL) ZONE, AT 10840
LONG BEACH BOULEVARD, LYNWOOD,
CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of_ Lynwood'
pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject
application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered all
pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined
that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines Section b(3) as amended; and
WHEREAS, the project is consistent with the intent of the'
General Plan in that the subject site is classified C-2A (Medium
Commercial);
Section 1. The Planninq Commission hereby finds and
determines as follows:
�A. That the granting of the proposed Conditional Use Permit
will not adversely affect the General Plan. �
B. That the proposed location of the Conditional Use is in i
accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and
, the purpose of the zone in which the site is located. �
i
C. That the proposed location of the Conditional Use and the �
conditions under which it would be operated or maintained
will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity; �
I
D. That the proposed Conditional Use Permit will comply with I
each of'the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance
as stated in the conditions below;
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
approves the proposed project subject to the following
conditions:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �
1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable I
regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform I
Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code. �
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or I
structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community
Development Department, Planning Division, for review. i
I
3. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement �
of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and i
agrees to the conditions stated herein before any building ' �
permits are issued.
�
f:\resolutn\reso2490 �
�
1 I
I
�
� �
, 4. The applicant shall construct a screening wall pursuant to
the concept plan prepared by the Community Development.
Department and shall submit construction drawing for the '
wall to the Director of Community Development for approval.
prior to issuance of a building permit.
PLANNING DIVISION
5. This permit shall become void one hundred twenty (120) days,;
unless extended, after the use permitted has been abandoned.
or has ceased to be actively exercised.
6. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood
, main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving.
the proposed development.
7. All work shall be conducted entirely within an enclosed; •
building. � `
8. Daily operating hours sha11 be from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
9. Reflect artificial light away from adjoining.
properties.
l0. No damaged or wrecked vehicles shall be stored on site. No
portion of the site shall be used for storage unless it is
auto tire repair and sales related activity. �
' 11. On-site traffic circulation and parking should be developed i
in such a manner that ingress and egress accesses are
separated or channeled so that conflicting traffic movements i
are minimized.
12. Open storage of materials, products and equipment shall be
completely concealed from view of vehicular and pedestrian
traffic by an architectural barrier approved by the " �
Community Development Department Director or his/her I
designee. I
�
13. The property shall be used solely for automotive body and �
fender repair shop.
14. All signage must be reviewed and approved by the Planning, I
Building an& Redevelopment Divisions.
15. All necessary permits and licenses shall be obtained prior
to operation.
Landscapina
16. No less than 7% of the total site, excluding lot area
dedicated to public right-of-way, shall be landscaped. The
landscaping plans shall be approved by the Community
Development Director prior to installation.
17. The applicant is required to submit a landscape plan drawn
by a licensed landscape architect to the satisfaction of the
Director of Community Development prior to any building
perinit being issued.
18. All planting shall be beds of a minimum width of five feet
(5') except where landscape area accommodates driveway
curves, and a minimum area throughout the parking area. In
addition, all parking aisles shall have planter areas at
each end. �
i
19. The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs
combined with ground cover as follows: One(1j five (5)
gallon shrub for each twenty (20) square feet of planter
area; two (2) fifteen (15) gallon trees for each eight (8)
parking spaces.
� f:�resolutn�reso2490 � � � � : � �
2 .
� �
20. Al1 planter area fronting perimeter walls must be landscaped
with shrubs and or crawling ground cover plants. •
21. Al1 landscaping shall be permanently maintained. Lawn and.
ground covers are to be trimmed or mowed regularly, with all�
planted area kept free of weeds and debris.
All plantings are to be kept in a healthy and growing �
condition. An automatic sprinkler or irrigation system�
shall be provided and maintained in working condition. �
22. There shall be a minimum of twenty-five (25) parking spaces'
including one (2) handicap parking space.
Each off-street parking space shall not be less than twenty 1
(20) feet in length and nine (9) feet in width, exclusive of,
access driveways or aisles, except as noted below:
23. A parking space designed for the handicapped shall be
provided. This space may be provided as follows:
a. Dimensions. The minimum dimensions of each automobil`e�
' parking stall for the handicapped shall be not less than,
` � fourteen (14) feet in width by eighteen (18) feet in
length. Said stalls shall be lined to provide a nine'
' (9) foot parking area and a.five (5) foot loading and;
unloading area or;
. �, b. Two (2) spaces may be provided within a twenty-three
(23) foot wide area, lined to provide a nine (9) foot:
parking area on each side of a five (5) foot loading and,
. unloading area. The minimum length of each parking
space shall be eighteen (18) feet.
c. Location. All parking spaces for the handicapped shall�
be located adjacent to the main entrance of the facility,
for which the spaces are provided. The parking spaces
shall be positioned so that the handicapped persons
shall not be required to walk or wheel behind parked
• vehicles.
24. The parking arrangement,for the subject site shall have a•
circular, flow arrangement without dead-end aisles when
possible. - '
25. The applicant shall submit elevation drawings to the
Planning Division showing the exterior building design;
including the specification of colors, and materials. Prior.
to the issuance of building permits, the design of the, ,
subject building including color and materials, must obtain
approval by the Community Development Director or his/her
designee.
' 26. Prior to the installation, display, enlarging, modifying
relocating or changing of signs, a permit must be obtained•
from the Department of Community Development, Planning�
Division.
27. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally
compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent'
buildings. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc.
_ shall be installed without the prior written approval of the
Director of Community Development and required building'
permits. , '
: 28. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in a
sanitary condition pending construction and shall be
maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times.,
. Failure to comply may result in revocation of the;
Conditional Use-Permit.
� . f:\resalutn\resa2490 � �
3
i
�
' � �
29. A cover sheet of approved Conditions must be attached to
plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety
Division.
30. Any violation of said conditions in this resolution may
result in revocation or modification of the Conditional Use
Permit by the issuing body at a regularly scheduled meeting.
PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
31. Provide an irrevocable offer of dedication for five (5)
foot wide strip of property along Elizabeth Avenue and cut-
off corner at Long Beach Boulevard and Elizabeth Avenue.
32. Submit a drainage plan. Drainage plan will be checked by
Department of Public Works. No permits will be issued prior
to the approval of drainage plan.
33. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter and required
AC pavement along Elizabeth Avenue.
34. Close existing drive approach along Elizabeth Avenue and
construct proposed drive approach(es) per City standards
along Long Beach Boulevard and Elizabeth Avenue.
35. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected
separately. Construct laterals as necessary.
36. Install four (4) 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood
standards: two (2) along Long Beach Boulevard and two (2)
along Elizabeth Avenue.
37. Construct tree well covers per City of Lynwood standards for I
proposed street trees.
38. Underqround all utilities. i
39. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all . I
off-site improvements. I
40. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire
protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The �
work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by I
the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the
Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any, �
work. �
FIRE DEPARTMENT I
41. Provide approved portable fire extinguisher 40 B.C. type: �
I
42. No auto spray painting shall be conducted without approved �
spray booth. �
i
�
i
I
�
I
' �
�
I
�
f:\resolutn\reso2490 � � I
' I
4 I
i
I
�' ' � � �
Section 3. A copy of Resolution 2490 shal� be delivered to
the applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1993, by ,
members of the Planning_Commission voting as follows;
AYES:
NOES:
�
ABSENT:
,
ABSTAIN:
Errick R. Lee, Chairperson j
�;,.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sol Blumenfeld, Director Ken Fong
'Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney
�. I
�
^ . I
:^
. f:\resoW�n\reso2490
�
I
i I
, i
• I
I
. �
I
�.
5
I . . ' ' . . . . . �
�'—` �s � �
LYNWOOD CITY PLANNING COMMZSSION
SEPTEMBER 14, 1993, AT 7:30 P.M.
The City of Lynwood Planning Commission met in a Regular Session
in the City Ha11 Council Chambers at 11330 Bullis Road, at 7:30
p.m.
Chairperson'Lee presided.
The flag salute was led by Commissioner Hurley.
ROLL CALL
AYES: DI%ON, MUHSIN, HURLEY� LEE
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: MCMILLER, DOVE, PRYOR �
i
Commission then gave recognition that Councilman Heine, and �
Commissioner Cunningham were present in the audience. �
Chairperson Lee then asked if the agenda had been duly posted.
Mr. Blumenfeld then stated the agenda had been duly posted �
pursuant to the Brown Act.
�
Chairperson Lee entertained a motion to excuse Commissioners �
McMiller, Dove and Pryor. I
I
It was moved by Commissioner Muhsin, seconded by Commissioner I
Hurley.
ROLL CALL
. '
AYES: DIRON, MUHSIN, HURLEY, LEE '
NOES: NONE I
ABSENT: MCMILLER, DOVE, PRYOR
Chairperson Lee asked for the approval of the minutes for the ,
previous meeting. j
I
It was moved by Commissioner Muhsin, seconded by Commissioner '
Dixon to approne the`minutes of the previous meeting. �
ROLL CALL I
AYES: DIRON, MUHSIN, HURI,EY, LEE I
NOES: NONE i
ABSENT: MCMILLER, DOVE, PRYOR I
Chairperson Lee introduced the first item on the agenda General. �
Plan Amendment Case No. 7, this item is a continued item it is
also connected with item No. 2 None Change Case No. 7. �
Chairperson Lee asked for a motion to continued these items until
the next Planning meeting on October 12.
i
It was moved by Commissioner Hurley, seconded by Commissioner I
Dixon to continue this item. �
ROLL CALL
i
i
AYES: DI80N, MUHSIN, IiURLEY, LEE . i
NOES: NONE �
ABSENT: MCMILLER, DOVE, PRYOR (
Chairperson Lee then introduced the next item on the agenda Item I
No. 3, C.U.P. NO. 132, staff recommends continuance of this item. j
�
i
�
I
I
�
� �� � �
It was moved by Commissioner Hurley, seconded by Commissioner
Muhsin to continue this item to the next Planning meeting on
october 12.
ROLL CALL
AYES: DIRON, MUHSIN, HURI,EY, LEE
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: MCMILLER, DOVE, PRYOR
Chairperson Lee then introduced the next item on the aqenda,
Modified C.U.P. 125M stated that this case be withdrawn due to
the applicant's inability to meet with the community pursuant to
direction by the City Council on appeal of the subject case.
Chairperson Lee then asked if there was a staff report on this
condition.
Director of Community Development Sol Blumenfeld then stated that
the applicant has not conducted the required meeting pursuant to
the City Council. However he stated that the applicant wishes to I
go ahead and pursue the project. Staff requested that this item
not be withdrawn in order to continue the item, to October 12,
1993 meeting.
Commissioner Dixon is stepping down do to a conflict of !
interest. I
�
It was then moved by Commissioner Hurley, seconded by I
Commissioner Muhsin to continue this item until October 12.
ROLL CALL I
I
AYES: MUHSIN, HURLEY, LEE �
NOES: NONE
ABSE1dT: MCMILLER, DOVE, PRYOR
ASSTAIN: DIRON
I
Director of Community Development Sol Blumenfeld then introduced I
the next item on the agenda C.U.P. No. 133, applicant A. Moran, �
the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to develop a i
20,000 sq. ft. roller rink that will include a Disk Jockey booth,
two arcade rooms, a concession booth, and an adult lounge area in
an existing building at 3840 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. in the
C-2 zone. He then in'troduced Staff person Art Barfield to give a
report on this.
I
Associate Planner Art Barfield gave a description of the project i
and the Resolution to be approved. It has been recommended by I
Staff to adopt the attached Resolution 2489 and approve this '
C.U.P. with these two conditions, 1. Certifying that the project I
will not have a significant effect on the environment, and that a
Negative Declaration has been issued pursuant to the provisions
of State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061b (3). 2. �
Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 133, subject to the stated
conditions and requirements. . i
Chairperson Lee then asked about the closing off of the alleys I
and how were the Fire Trucks going to be able to get in and out �
if there was a fire. �
i
Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld stated that if �
there was a fire the Fireman would simply cut the lock and enter �
the alley as recommended by the fire department at site plan ' i
review committee. !
I
Chairperson Lee then asked to the hours of operation on Saturday �
because it was not listed on the Resolution. I
i
I
Director of Community.Development Sol Blumenfeld then stated that i
the applicant would be able to answer all business operations
questions.
�
�
; , � �
Chairperson Dixon had concerns about the fence relative to
exiting the restaurant.
After further discussion;
It was moved by Commissioner Dixon seconded by Commissioner
Hurley to open the public hearing.
. Robert Water 23028 Aspenole Dr. Diamond Bar, Ca. spoke on behalf
of himself and the other two applicants. He then informed the
Commission that the Roller Rink would be open'on Saturday from ':
12:00 noon until 1:00 a.m. He also stated he was willing to work
. with staff and Commission to have his C.U.P. approved. Spoke in
favor of this item. Spoke of the security, not allowing roller
blades, the lounge area. Also stated that he is planning to work .
with the community, especially with Parks and Recreation.
Commissioner Dixon was concerned about the lounge area.
Commissioner Muhsin was concerned as to security.
Commissioner Hurley asked about adult nites and kid sessions.
Chairperson Lee then asked if there was anyone wishing to speak
against this item.
Alice Brown 11308 Ernestine spoke in opposition of this C.U.P.
Cynthia Jones 11316 Ernestine spoke in opposition of this C.U.P.
It was then moved by Commissioner Hurley, seconded by
Commissioner Dixon to close the Public Hearing. �
After further discussion from Commission; '
It was moved by Commissioner Hurley seconded by Commissioner
Dixon to continue this item until the next Planning Committee,on
October 12, so that the applicant can resolve the necessary '
improvements as to the Lounge, and the security.
' Commissioner Dixon suggested to the residents that they get
involved in this project so that any negative ideas they had
could be resolved.
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS
NONE
STAFF COMMENTS +
Auto Sales/Service Ordinance, Move-On Ordinance, and Fence Height,
Ordinance, Community Director Sol Blumenfeld stated that'
Commission input was requested on these ordinances prior to'
issuing draft revisions by the next planning meeting.
PUBLIC ORALS
NONE
COI�SISSION ORALS
Commissioner Dixon spoke on the people getting more involved with
projects in the community.
Chairperson Lee spoke about special events that would be coming;
up in the future.
It was then moved by Commissioner Muhsin, seconded by'
, Commissioner Hurley to adjourn the meeting at 8:4D p.m. until the�
� next scheduled planning meeting.
,. � M
----------------------------------
ERRICK R. LEE, CHAIRPERSON
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
------------------------------ ----------------------
SOL BLUMENFELD� DIRECTOR KENNETH FONG, DEPUTY
OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY ATTORNEY
I
I
i
I
I �
�
i
- �
-. I
I
� i
i
I
i
�
,
i
;
;
�
I
i
I
�
�