HomeMy Public PortalAboutA1993-12-14 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION . r , • • �
AGENDA `
LYNWOOD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION r
REGULAR MEETING - 7:30 P.M. I� r L� r� I
� CIT`( OF L'lN�P.�OOD
C i t y H a l l C o u n c i l C h a m b e r s ! CITY CLERKS :;•"r�iCE
11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, CA �' � ,,,
��._ � 1;;:;3
AM PH
December ia, 1993 '�I��9iIDill�l2iliZi3i4�5i6
;�
Errick R. Lee
,�q C����
Chairperson ^ ,
�����
Carlton McMiller ponald Dove. i
Vice Chairman Commissioner ,
Roy Pryor Joyce Hurley �
Commissioner Commissioner �
Jamal Muhsin ,
Commissioner `
� f
C O M M I S S I O N C O U N S E L: �
William Rudell �
Interim City Attorney �
, I
STAFF•
Sol Blumenfeld, Director Robert Diplock � �
Community Development Department Planning Manager
: �
Art Barfield Louis Omoruyi
Associate Planner Associate Planner i
I
Louis E. Morales, Jr. Paul Nguyen �
Associate Planner Civil Engineer Assoc. �
i
i
I
I
i
I
� � i
I
f:\wpfites\dec93 ;
� , I
1
�
. , I
` , i
i
I
� {;
� � �4 n �'
`� ��rt�! �{� �i.�
r � • •
� .�
t � .
f�Y :a
December 14, 1993
OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Call meeting to order.
B. Flag salute.
C. Roll call of Commissioners. �
D. Certification of Agenda Posting. j
E. Approval and signing of minutes for the October 12, 1993 and'
November 9, 1993 Planning Commission Meeting.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING:
1. MODIFIED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 125M
Applicant: Rick Kesseler
COMMENTS•
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use I
Permit to develop a sixteen (16) unit townhouse development at " �
4291 Carlin Avenue in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone.
This item was approved by the Planning Commission on June 8, -' �
1993 and subsequently appealed to City Council. The item was.
to be returned for further input by the community and reheard I
by the Planning Commission.
RECOMMENDED ACTZON: i
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the �
Planning Commission continue Conditional IIse Permit No. 125M. �
to the Planning Commission meeting of January il, 1993 as I
requested by the applicant. i
NEW BUSINESS• i
� I
I
2. ZONE CHANGE CASE NO. ZC6 I
Applicant: Nathaniel Roberson �
i
COMMENTS• �
� I
The applicant is requesting approval of a Zone Change (ZC 6) �
from R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) to CB-1 (Commercial) in �
order to develop a 13,500 square foot, two-story commercial '
building with office rental spaces and retail stores at the
northest corner of Atlantic Avenue and Olanda Street. I
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ;
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the �
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2468: i
A. Approving Resolution No. 2468 and recommending City I
Council adoption of Zone Change, Case No. 6.
B. Certifying that the project wil not have a significant �
effect on the environment and that a Negative Declaration i
has been issued pursuant to the provisions of State CEQA i
Guidelines.
I
f:\wpfiles�dec93
I
2 I
I
I
-- I
� �
3. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CASE NO. GPA 6
Applicant: Nathaniel Roberson
COMMENTS•
The applicant is requesting approval of a General Plan
Amendment from R-2 (Two-Family Residential) to CB-1
(Commercial) in order to develop a 13,500 square foot, two-
story commercial building with office rental spaces and retail
stores at the northwest corner of Atlantic Avenue and Olanda
Street.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2467:
A. Approving Resolution No. 2467 and recommending that City
Council adopt General Plan Amendment, Case No. 6.
B. Certifying that the project will not have a significant I i
effect on the environment and that a Negative Declaration �
has been issued pursuant to the provisions of State CEQA i
Guidelines.
4. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP CASE NO. TPM 28 � �
Applicant: Nathaniel Roberson i
�
COMMENTS: �
The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Parcel Map �
to consolidate three (3) parcels into one (1) lot in order to I
allow for the development of a 13,500 square foot two-story
commercial building at the northwest corner of Atlantic Avenue �
and Olanda Avenue, in the R-3 (Multi-Family) zone. �
I
RECOMMENDED ACTION: I
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2469: �
A. Ceritying that the project will not have a significant �
effect on the environment and that a Negative Declaration' i
has been issued pursuant to the provisions of State CEQA ;
Guidelines. ;
B. Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. Case 28, subject to the '
stated conditions and requirements. �
5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO CUP 127
Applicant: Nathaniel Roberson i
COMMENTS: !
I
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use '
Permit to develop a 13,500 square feet, two-story commercial
building with office rental space and retail stores at the i
northwest corner of Atlantic Avenue and Olanda Avenue in the
R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone. !
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the I
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2470: I
A. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 127, I
will not have a significant effect on the environment and �
certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate. '
i
3 �
i
�
�
� �
�:
B. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 127, subject to the
stated conditions and requirements.
6. VARIANCE CASE NO. VAR 26 �
Applicant: Mario S. Rios
COMMENTS•
The applicant is requesting a Variance to reduce the required
rear yard from twenty feet (20') to four feet (4') to complete
the development of a two (2) bedroom dwelling with an attached
two (2) car garage at 12435 Harris Avenue in the R-2 (Two-
Family Residential) zone, Lynwood, California. �
RECOMMENDED ACTION: j
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the �
Planning Commission continue Variance No. 26 until the January
11, 1994 Planning Commission meeting as requested by the �
applicant.
7. CONDZTZONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. CUP 137 I
Applicant: Mario S. Rios i
i
COMMENTS• _- ,
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use - I ,
Permit to allow completion of a single family dwelling at �
12435 Harris Avenue in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone.' �
RECOMMENDED ACTION: �
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the I
i
Planning Commission continue CUP No. 137 until the January li, I
1994 Planning Commission meeting as requested by the �
applicant. �
i
COMMENTS I
PUBLIC ORALS �
COMMISSION ORALS
- Presentation of SELAC Plan I
- Discussion of Fence Permit and Conditional Use Permit For ;
Auto Repair at 11099 Atlantic Avenue �
ADJOURNMENT ;
Adjourn to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on I
January 10, 1994 at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall Council Chambers,
11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California. � �
1 �
' �
�
�
�
f
�
�
f:\upfiles\dec93 .
4 f
I
;s
�� � � '
CITY OF LYNWOOD - PLANNING COMMISSION !
OCTOBER 12, 1993 � �
The City of Lynwood Planning Commission met in a Regular Session7
in the City Hall Council Chambers, 11330 Bullis Road, at 7:40.
p.m. ' +
Chairperson Lee presided. �
Commissioners Dixon, Muhsin, Pryor and Lee answered the rolli
call.
I
Also present were Community Development Director Blumenfeld,i
Deputy City Attorney Kenneth Fong, Associate Planner Louis�
Omoruyi and Civil Engineering Associate Paul Nguyen. j
Community Development Director Blumenfeld stated the Agenda had'
been duly posted in accordance with the Brown Act. !
i
It was moved by Commissioner Muhsin, seconded by Commissioner
Dixon to excuse Commissioners McMiller, Dove and Hurley. �`
ROLL CALL
AYES: COMMISSIONER DIXON, MUIiSIN, PRYOR� LEE !
NOES: NONE �"
ASSENT: C01�4�SISSIONER McMII,LER, DOVE, HURLEY
1
It was then moved by Commissioner Dixon, seconded by Commissioner,
Muhsin and carried to approve the following minutes:
a) Regular Meeting, September 14, 1993. �
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS '
Director of Community Development Sol Blumenfeld introduced the;
first item on the agenda, General Plan Amendment Case no. 7 and
Zone Change Case No. 7, applicant Sean Dayani. Items No. 1 and 2
- are concurrent. After consideration staff respectfully requests
the item be continued to the next regular scheduled meeting of
November 9, 1993. �
It was moved by Commissioner Muhsin, seconded by Commissioner
" Pryor to continue the items to the next regular scheduled
meeting. j
;
ROI,L CALL' �
AYES: • COMMISSIONER DIXON, MUHSIN, PRYOR, AND LEE '
NOES: NONE �
ASSENT: COMMISSIONER MCMILLER, DOVE, HURLEY
Community Development Director Blumenfeld then introduced the
next item on the Agenda item No.3, Conditional Use Permit Case
No. 132, Applicant-Manuel Mancilla. �
Associate Planner Louis Omoruyi stated applicant is requesting a
Conditional Use Permit in order to establish an automobile repair
center at 2918 E. Imperial Hwy. in the M(industrial) zone. Staff .
respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning
. Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2487. and approve
C.U.P No. 132, subject to the stated conditions and requirements�
;
Chairperson Lee then opened the Public Hearing. i
;
Chon Cervantes of C.C. Consultants spoke on behalf of Applicant'
Manuel Mancilla. i
Jim Marquez, 18b0 (Inaudible) spoke in favor of C.U.P. 132. �
�
Hearing no further discussion, it was moved by Commissione'r
' Muhsin, seconded by Commissioner Dixon to continue this item to�
the next regular scheduled meeting.on November 9, 1993.
i
i
,i
,
,+ , .
r � • �
� �
{
.
. ROLL CALL �
AYES: COMMISSIONER DI%ON, MUHSIN, PRYOR, LEE �
NOES: NONE j
ABSENT: COMMISSIONER MCMILLER� DOVE, HURLEY i
,
' Director of Community Development Blumenfeld then introduced the.
next item on the Agenda Conditional Use Permit No. 125,�
, Applicant-Rick Kessler. Stated at this time both staff and the�
, applicant respectfully requests this item be continued to the:
Regular Scheduled Meeting of November 9, 1993.
It was moved by Commissioner Pryor, seconded by Commissioner: •
Muhsin to continue this item to November 9, 1993.
ROLL CALL
AYES: `�COMMISSIONER MUHSIN, PRYOR, LEE �
. �
NOES: - NONE
, ABSENT: MCMILLER, DOVE, HURLEY �
ABSTAIN: COMMZSSIONER DIXON
Director of Community Development Blumenfeld introduced the,
°. next-item on the agenda Conditional Use Permit #133, Applicant-;
Albert Moran. He stated that the applicant is requesting a;
. Conditional Use Permit to develop a roller rink of approximately;"
20,000 feet which will include a Disk Jockey Booth, two arcade' •
rooms,, a concession booth in an existing building at 3840 Martin;
, Luther King Jr. Boulevard in the C-2 zone. (Light Commercial)
zone. This item was continued from the September 14, 1993 meetingj
in order to allow the applicant time to meet with the community!
to discuss a detailed security plan as well as time to correct�
�issues dealing with separate restroom facilities. Staff�
- recommends approval of project, which includes modifications
proposed by the Commission. i �
Open Public Hearing. '
r
i
Robert water 23028 Aspenole Dr. spoke in favor of this C.U.P. He
also addressed the Public Issues that were brought up.
Closed Public Hearing. {
�
After,further discussion from staff;
It was moved'by Commissioner Dixon seconded by Commissioner toi
approve C.U.P. 133 and the attached Resolution No. 2489.
, ROLL CALL !
i
, AYES: COMMISSIONER DIXON, MUHSIN, PRYOR, LEE
NOESe NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONER MCMILLER, DOVE, HURLEY
4.
Director of Community Development Sol Blumenfeld then introduced'
the next item on the Agenda General Plan Amendment Case No. 8?
applicant, City of Lynwood.Item No. 6, 7, are concurrent. The;
, applicant is requesting approval o£ a General Plan Amendment (GPA'
8) fx•om CB-1 (Commercial) to R-1 (Single Family Residential) in
order to construct a single family home on the north side of;
Louise Street, between Nichols and Gertrude Avenue,'in the CB-1�
(Commercial) zone. Staff respect£ully requests that after; .
cons:ideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached�
Resolution No. 2494. , .
. Associate Planner Louis omoruyi, then gave a brief presentationl
pertaining to this item. ;
After. further discussion;
;
�
_� {
°yi L . � � • ± .
�'
� !
It was moved by Commissioner Dixon, seconded by Commissioner�'
Muhsin, to approve General Plan Amendment Case No. 8 and'Zonei
' Change Case No, 8. �
�
Motion carried by a show of hands. 3
�
,
.' Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld then introduced the;
next item on the Agenda No. 8, 9, and 10 stated that they were:
` all concurrent. Variance Case No. 25, Tentative Parcel'Map Case;
No.10 and Conditional Use Permit No. 135. Applicant Joel Govea,
stated Associate Planner Louis Omoruyi will give a brief;
° presentation. �
Associate Planner Louis Omoruyi then gave a brief presentation on'
behalf of these items, he stated the purpose of the VAR is to�
� allow reduction of the required lot width, the TPM 30 isi
requesting approval for the purpose of subdividing one lot into.
. two and C.U.P. 135 was approval to develop a single family
dwelling at 11128 Louise Avenue�in the R-3 zone.
i '
. It was then moved by Commissioner Pryor, seconded by Commissioner:
Dixon, to approve 2491, 2492, and 2493. '
Motion carried by a show of hands. �
Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld then introduced�
the next item on the Agenda C.U.P. 134, applicant David Herrera,�
stated the applicant is requesting to develop an addition to an
existing auto body and fender shop at 10840 Long Beach Blvd.�'
� Staff respectfully request that after consideration, the Planning;
' Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2490. i
�
Open Public Hearing
'
David. Herrera {Inaudible), applicant spoke in favor of thisi
C.U.P. t
i
" Jaime (Inaudible) 8481 California Ave South Gate spoke in favor�
of this C.U.P. �
,
After further discussion from staff it was moved by Commissioner;
Muhsin and seconded by Commissioner Dixon, that this item is to;
be continued until the next meeting until November 9, 1993.
i
• Motion carried by a show of hands. j
,
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS �
� �
NONE.
STAFF CONII�IENTS '
;
Director of Community Development said they would come back with�
soine recommendation as to the.Auto Sales/Service, Move-On and�
Fence Height Ordinance. �
�
�
COMMISSION ORALS
;
NONE i
It was then moved by Commissioner Lee, seconded by Commissionerj
Muhsin to adjourn at 10:45. �.,
�
------------------------------ :
ERRICK R. LEE, CHAIRPERSON ,
APPROVED'AS TO CONTENT:
-------------------------- ------------------------------ '
,
SOL BLUMENFELD, DIRECTOR KENNETH FONG, DEPUTY ,
OF'COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY ATTORNEY �
,
� . ��
.
j
,�� � ' • • ; .
,
�
;
CITY OF LYNWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION �`
NOVEMBER 9, 1993 AT 7:30 P.M. ;
1
The Lynwood City Planning Commission met in a Regular Session at I
11330 Bullis Road in the Council Chambers at 7:30 p.m.
Chairperson Lee presided. Commissioners McMiller, Muhsin, Dove,;
' Pryor, Hurley, and Lee answered the roll call. Also present were�
Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld, Associate Planner',
Louis Morales, Civil Engineering Associates Pau1 Nguyen, and�
Deputy City Attorney Kenneth Fong. �
�
The F.lag salute was led by Commissioner Hurley. !
Chairperson Lee then stated that Commissioner Dixon had stated;
she w:ished to resign from the Planning Commission.
All Commissioners wished Commissioner Dixon well on all her�
futura endeavors. !
,
ROLL CALL
�
AYES: MCMILLER, MUHSIN, DOVE, PRYOR, HURLEY, LEE
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE �
r
Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld stated the Agenda�
had been duly posted according to the Brown Act. ,
� No minutes at this time. �
Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld then introduced the'
, first item on the agenda, stating that item no. 2 was concurrentf
with item No.l. The applicant, H. Sean Dayani, is requesting!
approval of a General Plan Amendment (GPA 7) from Town House &�
Cluster Housing to a Commercial designation in the R-2 (Two-�
Family) residential zone. The subject property, is located at;
12217 Atlantic Ave and encompasses approximately 75,000 square+
feet. The Plan Amendment and Zone Change have been proposed ini
order to accommodate future commercial development for this site.'
, After careful consideration staff respectfully requests that the;
Planning Commission deny the application for Plan,
Amendment No. 7 and Zone Change No. 7. i
Open L�ublic Hearing ,
H. Sean Dayani attorney representing applicant spoke' in favor of;
this project. He felt that this project should not be denied. �
'
�
�
�
�
;
,
i
;
� � � � - � I. �. .
i
i
{`
1 s �
, • • �
b,l �
A1 Lambardi also spoke in favor of this project. �
1
Close Public Hearing. ;
Commissioner pove stated that he had mixed feeling about thisi
' project, because of the area. t
{
Director of Community Dedelopment Sol Blumenfeld then stated that�
this area did have different potential.
i
Commissioner Pryor made a motion to approve the Zone Change. '
;
Commissioner Hurley stated that she had a number of questions on'
this matter and that it would help if the applicant were given',
' another month to resolve the issue. '
After further discussion; ;
It was moved by Commissioner pove, seconded Commissioner Pryor;
for a recommendation to Council to change the property zoningi
from residential to commercial, and approve the General Planj
Amendment.
�
>
ROLL CALL
, -
AYES: COMMISSIONER MUHSIN, DOVE, PRYOR, HURLEY
NOES: COMMISSIONER MCMILLER, LEE t
ABSENT: NONE "
Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld then introduced the;
next item on the Agenda, C.U.P. 132.'The applicant, Manuel�
Mancilla, is requesting a Conditional Use Permit in order to
establish an automobile repair center at 2918 E. Imperial Hwy. ini
the M(Industrial) zone. Staff respectfully requests that after,
consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached+
Resolution No. 2487; certifying that the project is�
categorically exempt from the provision of the CE4A and approving
. the subject request. �
t
,
Open Public Hearing �
,
Chon Cervantes-C.C. Consultant Services stated he had no problems�
• with the Conditions and was in favor of.this C.U.P. r
Victor Palacos spoke in favor of project. i,
Close Public Hearing. i
;
;
i
,
�
;
;
a
. l
�
�
.
_ i
. ;
r i
• • I
I
�,�. � � . � ,
i
It was moved by Commissioner Mcmiller, seconded by Commissionerl
' Dove to approve C.U.P. 123 requiring a screen wall for the�
project commensurate with the City's Commercial Rehabilitation;
Program: '
ROLL CALL •
AYES: MCMILLER, MUHSIN, DOVE� HURLEY, LEE ,
NOES: PRYOR
ABSENT: NONE �
�
Community Director Sol Blumenfeld then introduced the next item�
on the agenda C.U.P. 125, applicant Rich Kessler. The applicantj
proposes to build a 16 unit townhouse development at 4291 Carlin.i
Staff respect£u1Ty requests that this case be withdrawn, however;
staff' did receive a letter from the applicant requesting. i
' a continuance. �
, It was moved b.y Commissioner pove seconded by Commissioner.
McMiller to approve staffs recommendation. �
,
Motian carried unanimously. ;
Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld then introduced the'
next item on the Agenda, C.U.P. 135, applicant Joel Govea. Thej_
appl:icant is requesting a Variance (Case No. Var. 25), a=
Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 30 and C.U.P. 135 for development'.
� of 2 single fainily dwellings. �,
. Associate Planner Louis Morales then gave a brief presentation on�
these three applications. �
� Open Public Hearing. `
Raul Lopez (Inaudible) Wilmington, representative for the;
applicant spoke in favor of.these items and stated they are.
willi.ng to comply with all the conditions. �
Close Public Hearing.
It was moved by Commissioner pove seconded by Commissioner Muhsin�
to approve VAR. 25, TPM 30 and C.U.P. 135.
;
Motion carried unanimously. !
Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld then introduced thei
next item on the Agenda, C.U.P. 134, applicant David Herrera.:
This is a continued item from the october 12, meeting, to allow
the applicant to review plans with staff. :
r
�
1
,
I
;
+
, �
' , ;
i
.
i
a
g
. . ,.
f
I
Open Public Hearing '
David Herrera applicant spoke in favor of this project and stated'
he was willing to comply with all the conditions. j
Close Public Hearing. �
It was moved by Commissioner Pryor, seconded by Commissioner
Hurley to approve C.U.P. 134. �
Motion carried unanimously. �
;
Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld then introduced the�
next item on the Agenda C.U.P. 136, applicant, Watts Health',
Foundation.
' ,
Associate Planner Louis Morales stated that the applicant wished
to modify an existing Conditional Use Permit for an Adult Day'
Care Center at 2600 Industrial Way in order to expand. Staff�
respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning
Commission adopt the attached Resol'ution No. 2497. ;
- Open Public Hearing
Sidney Gipson spokesman for Watts Health Foundation spoke in,;"
favor of this C.U.P. and stated that they are willing to comply;
with'all Conditions. �
j
Glose Public Hearing , '
Commissioner Hurley is stepping down due to a conflict of+
interest.
i
�.
It was then moved by Commissioner McMiller, seconded by:
Commissioner pove to approve this C.U.P.
. Motion carried by a show of hands. ,
;
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS
None �
STAFF COMMENTS '
' Draft Auto Sales/Service ordinance discussed briefly. '.
�
�,
COMMISSION ORALS j
Commissioner Pryor informed staff and Commissioners that he to;
will be resigning in December, due to retirement.
;
�
,
. i
.
i
i '
;
'
. .. � .. � . i �
i
. ` i.
t
I
1 .
, 1 �,
�� � � � �
�'
Commissioner Hurley then asked staff if there was some kind of
workshop on the General Plan so that she and o�hers could have
better knowledge of this, and it was agreed that a workshop would
be prepared for early 1994. �
" It was then moved by Chairperson Lee, and seconded by,
Commissioner Muhsin to adjourn at 9:05. ' .
'
ERRICK R. LEE, CAAIRPERSON ;
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
, +
.
• -------------------------- ------------------------------
' SOL BLUMENEELD, DIRECTOR KENNETH FONG, DEPUTY !
OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY ATTORNEY ' .
,'
� � �_ �
R �
�
I
� � �
�
I
' ;
1
�
�
' ' �.
�
. . �
(
;
i
' .
1
' I.
I
;
. ;
i
a
t ' i
. • a r � . ,� , , ](��
".���• . � ! . � `i i � �" 1 � ,, Y 1 �V V . ..
4'.,1. - �
� �}�� � i�'� �.
DATE: DeCember 14, 1993 ;
' T0: PLANNING COMMISSION ;
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director�
Community Development �
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 125m �
Applicant: Rick Kesseler
PROPOSAL ,
The applicant is requesting approval of .a sixteen (16) unit
Townhouse development at 3191 Carlin Avenue in the R-2 (Townhouse �
and Cluster Housing) zone. ,
FACTS•
�
1. On June 8 1993 the Plannin Commission a �
, , g pproved the request
to develop sixteen (16) units at the subject site.
4
2. On June 12, 1993, the Planning Cominission decision of approval ,
was appealed by Henry L. Sims to the City Council. �
,_
3. On July 20, 1993, the City Council heard the matter and made ;
a recommendation to have the project developer redesign the
project and present the revised plans to the community group i
in opposition. Upon review and consent from the community
group the project was to go back to the Planning Commission I
for action.
4. On November 9,' 1993, the applicant submitted a written ',
correspondence requesting an extension of the project to the 1
Planning Commission meeting of December 9, 1993 to allow time ;
for redesign of the project.
�
5. On November 9, 1993, the Planning Commission approved the �
continuation of the project at the request of the applicant. !
CONCLUSION• �
�
Prior to the last Planning Commission meeting, staff was '
recommending withdrawal of the project due to the developer's '
, failure to ineet with the community and submit revised project ,
- plans. The applicant requested that this case be continued to this '
meeting. Staff spoke with Mr. Kesseler on Monday, December 6, �
. 1993. He indicated that he had talked to the neighbors and they �
were still opposed to the project. Ae further stated that he was
scheduled to meet with the project investors on December 13, 1993, •
to determine if they wished to continue with the project. ;
RECOMMENDATION '
° Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the Planning ;'
Commission continue Conditional Use Permit No. 125m to the Planning �
Commission meeting of January il, 1993, as requested by the +
applicant.
�
� f:up\planning\kessdec . . � .
1
'
+
e,
, .,}. _.._ . -
• • i
w ,
}� ,
y �
;
- �, y � �,YNwooD - ;
t cit o �
Lim7 , .
�:� �: ., �.�.�,.
,�'' �1 City vUeeting Cti�QQenges I���� i
� ������
� � 11330 BULLiS ROAD
1
� LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262
� (310) 603-0220 � - '
�
DATE: December 6, 1993 �
TO: Rick Kessler, Applicant ,
° Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 125 j'�
r -�...�
'� FROM: Robert Diplock, Planning Manager �' �,�) �
Community Development Dep'artment ��
t
SUBJECT: DISPOSITION STATUS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ,
CASE N0. 125
As we discussed today on the phone, Staff is recommending ;
withdrawal of the subject case from Planning Commission
consideration at its December 14, 1993,meeting. ;
If you would like this case continued to the January 11, 1994 +
meeting of the Planning Commission, please fax us a written
request for.continuance, prior to 5 p.m., Wednesday, December 8, :
1993.
If you have any questions concerning the project or the subject '
matter thereof, please call me at (310) 603-0220, extension 326. '
cc: Louis Morales
Chron file '
Case file: CUP 125
i
Y
i
!
{
� � f\planning\srtaffrpt�f:12993kes.mem ' ��
t
. f
,
i
..... , . . � - " .
' ° i
� �
`i� f
�4i �
� V
1`
� "Y a
�
`� I .
C �
ti,. .
C�
.
: ,
�: _ . �_ -_ _�_. .. ..1lA._ . _. . �
L - 5- 5 3 M G N 1 E:� R E N L T Y W O 2 L D A� I O N 8 E L L P. 0 2
�Z i
,,�,
1
.a� 13806 S�n Aiitonio Drive, Norwalk, CA 9065a /(310) 863ao41 .
��7V��/� ■ U 13317 E. South Street, Cerritos� CA 90701 /(310) 92A-4854 /(7'14) 827-7355
r� �5p2g lmpettal Hwy,, La Mirada, CA 90638 /(310) 947-0672 /(714) 994�5000
R E A L T Y ��� U 9944 Flower Stro�t, Bollfiower, CA 90706 /(310) 92tl-1822 ;
G 9140 Whittivr 61vd„ Pico Rlvera, CA 90860 /(310) 948-3A01 {
_
_ �
�
DFCEMBER 6, 1993
� �
T0: ROBERT DIPLOCK
CI'T'Y OF LYNWOOD .
RE: CUP 125 '
�
WE ARE STILL NEGOTTAxING WSTH THE NEIGHI30RIi00D GROUP
AND OUR TNVESTORS. PLEASE EXTENA OUR MEETTNG WITH T HE I,
PLANNING COMMTSSION UNTIL JANUARY 1994. �
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE. FOR YOUR COOPERATION IN THIS ;
MATTER. ;
SINCEREILY, i
� �
' ;
�' �
/��� � ,
RSCK KF;SSELER ;
�
;
i
�.
�
�
f
�
� � � ��
i
j
I ,
�
{
j
- f
V � i
. 1� y
� � 1
4.
1�
`U
�A
• �
I
t
X
� �� ,
��
. �� ( �
i � .. . . .•
� i
"�����; �� DATE: Decemb� 24, 1993 �������p TF�1117� �
�..,C,�ul I � i�lv
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION I j '
,1 C,`� � . L'J �
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Dire�d� ''
Community Development Dep�ment ,
SUB,7ECT: 2one Chancte - Case No. ZC 6 +
Applicant: Nathaniel Roberson !
,
PROPOSAL•
The applicant is requesting approval of a Zone Change (ZC 6) from '
R-3 (MUlti-family Residential) to CB-1 (Commercialj in order to �
develop a 13,500 square foot, two story commerical building with �
office rental spaces and retail stores at the northwest corner of
Atlant:ic Avenue and Olanda Street. 1'
FACTS: '
,
1. Source of Authoritv �
. ;
Section 25-27:1 a. of the City Zoninq Ordinance allows the �
property owner(s) to initiate a change in zoning boundaries�
and classification. �
;
�..
2. Property Location: , ,
The area is located on the northwest corner of Atlantic
Avenue.and Olanda Street and is comprised of three (3)�
parcels to be consolidated (see attached Location Map). +
i
�
3. ProAertv size:
The subject property is a rectangular shaped lot, ,
approximately 29,645 square feet in size. •
> � ;
4. Existina Land Use: �
The property is vacant. The surrounding land uses are as �
follows:
North - Cluster Housing +
South - Commercial/ Cluster Housing
East - Commercial
West - Cluster Housing �
� � � �
5. Land Use Designation: ` � I
The General Plan Designation for the subject�property is 1 � I
Multi-Family Residential while the Zoning Classification is I
R-3. The surrounding land use designations are as follows:
General Plan Zoning I,
North - Multi-family Residential North - R-3 ; I
Soufh - Commercial South - C-2,R-2�
East - Commercial East - CB-1 ;
� West - Gluster Housing West - R-2 :
. �
i
6. Proiect Characteristics
The zone change would allow the proposed construction of a�
13,500 square feet two-story commercial building. '
,
. � f:\staffrpt\zc6 �
i
1
, I
;
7. Site Plan Re,.��w: • ?
� i
��,� On September 30, 1993, the Site Plan Review Committee i
evaluated the proposed zone change and recommends approval
to the Planning Commission, subject to specific conditions;
and requirements.
i
8. Zoning Enforcement History_ '
None of record at the time this report was prepared. '
9. Public Resoonse:
None of record at the time this report was prepared. `
. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
. 1. Consistencv with General Plan
The proposed land use is inconsistent with the existing '
zoning classification (R-3), and the General Plan'
designation, Multi-family Residential. The proposed;
development would require a Zone Change and a General Plan
Amendment.
2. Area Suitabilitv '
The subject area is adequate in size and shape to carry out �
the intent of the Commercial Development designation of the'"
, General Plan, and accommodate the proposed development�
relative to the proposed density, bulk of the strtictures,
parking, walls, fences, driveways, and other development'
standards required by the Zoning Ordinance. There is;
significant commercial development immediately to the south '
and east of the proposed zone change. '
. 3. Compliance with Development Standards
The proposed zone change would enable the the proposed use 1'
to be consistent with the commercial designation proposed in '
the associated General Plan Amendment (Case No. GPA 6) and ,,
meet all the development standards requird by the Zoning,
C�rdinance. However, the proposed use is currently ;
inconsistent with the adopted General Plan and zoning for .
the area.
4.� Compatibilitv �
The proposed commercial zone will be located at the '
northern edge of existing commercial development and across i
the street from several blocks of commercially zoned land. ;
The development will be screened from the multi-family !
residential development to the north and will not adversely 1
impact it. However, the zone change and the proposed
development would preclude residential development of,�
approximately .68 acrea currently shown in the City'�
General Plan. i
5. Conditions of Apbroval I
i
The Zone Change and improvements proposed, subject to the
conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, i
will not have a negative effect on the values of thei
surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the i
public health, safety or welfare.
For project description and Condition of Approval see '
Conditional Use Permit Case No. CUP 127, Resolution No. :
2470, Tentative Parcel Map Case No. TPM 28, and Resolution ;
No. 2469.
;
- f:\staffrpt\zc6 "
2
i
4� � � . . � }. .
C 'j • • .
'� 6. Benefits to Communitv �
The proposed zone change will enhance the commercial �
development in the surrounding area and facilitate the;
City's current commercial revitalization activities. �
7. Erivironmental Assessment ,
The Director of Community Development has determined that no'
substantial environmental impact will result from the;
• proposed zone change; therefore, a Negative Declaration has:
- been filed in the Community Development Department and in�
the Office of the City Clerk.
:' RECOMMENDATION•
�
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the;
� Planni.ng Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2468: �
;
1. Approving Resolution No. 2468 and recommending City ,
Council adoption of Zone Change, Case No.6. 1
,
. 2. Certifying that the project will not have a significant'
effect on the environment and that a Negative�
Declaration has been issued pursuant to the provisions
of State CEQA Guideines. ; _
,
� I
�,
�
ATTACHMENTS
r.
1. Location Map
� 2. Site Plan , '
3. Resolution No. 2468 "
;
i�
. ,
, ,
,
i
1
{
'
. f:\staffrpt\zc6 � � �
i
. i '
� J
�
3
�__,— ---- _--
--... ._._. ..._ ----.. . _
3 _._ .. __ ... _.... .�
;.
LOCATION iViAP :
,.
.. � I ` , I; '"" � .
^ �
1`' �'I �C' � � � I I I �I � I"
„P� M0 I �. I � � �-, _ `� � ;• .
�,� �- � Iq . �. .
i �
" � � �I: ( �- ' � �i. � i� I : j i i • :
�L 1� + � 1� I so * I Jo f � )• Iv r� I' n l! I• I n I :
7
-- - AVENUE '
„ _, ,,... , , _ �?:—;.—.�—�r
r -� i. r - ,.{��� � � �
� �' �__et_'� � �i4o1 y ' , o p
w � '— �a 3 : =��yg� _ �oi�' �
� z _. , J� J_„r __ �. ti o V , � s
. . W . . ; C_��'y LY. _T.s ' �.r. .r. ff :��d s M �p a° r '.
� Q � . Q �_ . S� i• ,.. _ ' � �a' a: ^a �a ;`� ,.
-s=-i �------ ' /�vn '� f! w .a ° a to " � 6�_ ..
P�� IL � �. . � � ay �:.
.� ,. ,« � ?
i ..... .�." ? .IA'!fi `o`„ v..�, :r)�f b°`��.
�. � �8 ' W . .. � . ..i w fl ° � S ' a � r� 4 , i 4
� � n � .m.n Z , �� � �n � '.s ui yetir '�, .,�� 'y y y
� W"_'__ w I�. Q . . �`� J•�
` � .
f �
.. � L__'_"'_ .. �
, �l1 --..—� ' .,.��.�._.�.�.}p_.._- - D ` �� � Y l, ( !� � ��
Q r I � RD �
W . . i �a6b� ^i :r*. � {y s G
Z �,.. �. , o, r,�� ',�- F<<
p 1 ' r � a r y,�,u
V F- � b� im.�. . � ,.. 4�i � 6. ` nr A r! �q �
� N 8 \0\ i \ : ` ' ' , f � � Q
e .�.�. z � � /f �?� �
'� �1 i ^' ; ��5�� ` t a y C. ��,' . e !i �
.. �W � p .. �.�. � ,.. . ��S„�d � a�" '�' ' ` ��'r ,
..,
� � � ; ,., , i \S9 BLOUN -,: '° a`° 4 ' e ' " a a
'kiJ . � ^ '�° � ui .. o � . ti � ,��� `•
J , I � �S� � . ��,a �
F- e .. .:,. '---- -ti`" --� � ° `f ' .
<n • ; I,ns , a;+..+
� e. � • s � I a, .� it
; U �' u ,.,.' ` i Sa� ..r � . -9 . u, „�
� ` .r� �'�.,�! F ; s ��' T � - yS � � � r �°� as
. . a � , � . , � �, , i ,w �.
l:_ � „ - ,• .. . , ,• '
, OLANDA ST. , ' ;� ,f ; ,.
�. ,'
.,�... ,, y «,.R ,,,.,, �,,• � A , , �. q a�
� `�,. O r 1y� p .f1
. . � :.- � :'i p/ � /� � � rn� >• � t � 1 • R2 "��,� A � i�" : , S 1 �
. . � � � 1 H l. � � � . i ��. ' ; j' , � \a , ' J I � , n . 2. � � � � -� . _ 1 44 �}
, . /3L0/ � n .� j ?+• � �-��'• � 1 �
� . �:i ro�3�
.. � M a 9 � :� w, : i i � s i•7 , o: o�
a �! �} '^ h � i'Y� M V`��'j 1Z'f,i.J� J
'n M _ _7/(.�t—_—_ I �, � � ro :'S� >� �. T� ?
� D /O // r..�. i; o•n . ro� y l ��.. `�� b� a �
.i7o1Q,i� fv111ed�C _---�____ a.�a.ai1 �� �� n � ��� � T.1 .
. � R4}�0 IA4d7� '___ :iw�__~^ � 31 ��?: b � ,°t. 1 f s. . . ..
. - . ,,, .�. -��--�� � ,��so,, . � G - coN :.a•� "'al:=
. , . . � iow �: iac3i : s i�` a � .
. 'h �' /J /I' ` vr-�._ _ ,.. �� .� " J � �S 1 •K 1 0; 1 � ? �e• .1. �7.
a v f M i.. .r �nl = Z1�
~ a ' ° ' t isc _ �a43�� `--- �� ; ia�oJ U �es �'� , °, M�=b`> ,�"�.`,. � 1
co tb n : 1 ?.ia - t� �. � i��''-�- � ts�4� �
� . � � � ,.<« ��.' W `�__ .i: � h, h- +.rz7J� � T ii 1 =:+ � �
� � : �7101.'� i 'f = Q.' y � Z � � _,1 �., . �1 b o
--[O'L•—� a/71o1'i � . �.j M){ a
� �37eY i:__^�i/2L?'= � w,II .. . - �- ----'� ° ' ? � , �T �
� J wi:�� R.� ��O' 1 t�
` `f �? 7 1
I
� � M 4 111ro; ��, i)9�� i X L /7)eb i i77// `.. ��� Isp t\u'� ���� .? �
� ��` O _-y�Yl` Q N I � S , ,� If
f/ 20 /0 ;`ys �`'"�� a., 0� ilii(�. i'119i/�`.� " �u.0 �� -
er. � � i... .0 w�.i . nn• 11� .
. ll�s�i ; . y �ino� � a' � '" ,
� �� � I M ���Y, n
� � � Ml �;� �� y� �til ` M � rs' . ; ' I '
, . � �' I �mb �1 i I ? 4 .
� r i ` i
+ -
i
.. .. . "'. ---. - a .—'.. . ..
. . . . .. ._ . , ,,
i .
r-
,
i
�
� . . i I I
l
/ . . . � .. . . . . I
t I
' I
C A S E N 0. -_ �� ��2�cu� 2-�; '
*,
.� • RESOLUTION NO. 2468 � �
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION �
OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD RECOMMENDING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE �
PERTASNING TO TAE OFFICIAL ZONING
ORDINANCE CHANGING THE ZONING ON LOT 16
OF TRACT NO. 7099 MB PAGES 101-6-7 OF THE �
LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER OFFICE, LOS �
ANGELES COUNTY, LOCATED AT NORTHWEST �
CORNER OF SOUTH ATLANTIC AVENUE AND '
OLANDA STREET, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. '
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, �
pursuant to law, held a public hearing on the subject i
application; and '
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered ,
all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the subject site is classified R-3 (Multiple
Family) which is inconsistant with a General Plan designation of ,
Commercial; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development has
determined that the proposal will not have a negative effect on
the environment, and has thereby declared a Negative Declaration �
for the project; and {
I
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of
Lynwood hereby finds and determines as follows:
�,
A.. The current R-3 (Multiple Family) zone of the subject '.
site is inconsistent with a General Plan designation of
Commercial .
B. The subject site would accommodate proposed �
commercial development due to its size, location, and proximity ;
to other commercial land uses. .
� C. The zone change to'CB-1 (Commercial) would be '
consistent with the General Plan designation of Commercial. .
` D.. The proposed zone change will not be detrimental to
, the properies surrounding the site.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of �
Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and the determi- �
nations, hereby approves Zone Change No. 6, and recommends City �
Council,adoption of an ordinance changing the zoning of this ;
property from R-3 (Multiple family) to CB-1 (Commercial).
;
�
,
f:\resolutn\reso2468� '
1
� � � i
�
i
; f Section 3. A�py of this resolution sha� be delivered to ;
. the applicant. .
� APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1993, by members �
of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
' AYES: .
.
NOES : . ;
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
;
Errick R. Lee, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sol Blumenfeld, Director William Rudell ,
Community Development Dept. Interim City Attorney
�
, f:\resolutn\reso2468
i
I
I
i
i
2 �
.,,���'''k� . . � . �
��� • 3
•DATE: Decemb8'r 14 1993
, , . � rrr � 1
1� �;r,r,rtiJ:"i i E L;V ��.
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
� ` � 7 �. � ,
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, DirecCtl��`� j � �° ��°"""°"'� ,
, Community Development DepaY�ment .
SUB,7ECT: General Plan Amendment - Case No. GPA 6
Applicant: Nathaniel Roberson
PROPOSAL• �
The applicant is requesting approval of a General Plan Amendment
from Multi-family Residential to Commercial in order to develop
a 13,500 square, two story commerical building with office
rental spaces and retail stores at the northwest corner of•
Atlantic Avenue and Olanda Street. i
FACTS:
1. Source of Authoritv
5ection 65358(a) of the State Planning and Zoning Law states
that "..if it deems it to be in the public interest, the'
legislative body may amend all or part of of the adopted`
General Plan."
2. Propertv Location:
The area is located on the northwest corner of Atlantic �
- Avenue and Olanda Street and is comprised of three (3)
parcels to be consolidated (see attached Location Mapj.
3. Property size• '
;
The subject property is a rectangular shaped lot, '
approximately 29,645 square feet in size.
4. Existing Land Use: ;
The property is vacant. The surrounding land uses are as �
follows:
North - Multi-family Residential
South - Commercial/ Cluster Housing
East - Commercial
West - Cluster Housing �
�
5. Land Use Designation:
The General Plan Designation for the subject property is'
Multi-family Residential while the Zoning Classification is
' R-3. The surrounding land use designations are as follows: .
General Plan Zoning
North - Multi-family Residential North - R-3
South - Commercial South - C2,R-2 !
East - Commercial East - CB-1
West - Cluster Housing West - R-2 �
6. Proiect Characteristics
The General Plan Amendment and associated Zone Change (Case
No. 2C 6) would allow for the construction of a 13,500�
, square feet two-story commercial building. ',
� f:\staffrpt\gpa6 �� ��
i i
1
, �
..
{
�
7. Site Plan Re�w• • 1
� ;� �
On September 30, 1993, the Site Plan Review Committee
evaluated the proposed General Plan Amendment and recommends
approval to the Planning Commission, subject to specific
conditions and requirements.
8. Zonina Enforcement Historv:
Alone of record at the time this report was prepared.
9. Public Resnonse:
• None of record at the time this report was prepared.
� ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
1. Consistency with General Plan
The proposed land use is inconsistent with the existing
zoning classification (R-3), and the General Plan
designation, Multi-family Residential. The General Plan,
Amendment if granted would allow the project to be,
consistent with the General Plan. The proposal is consistent
with Land Use Goal No.5 ("Encourage the development of new.
commercial and retail uses....."), Land Use Policy No.5
("... focus retail activity on significant nodes...."), and
Land Use Policy No.8 (..."insure the balance development of�
land uses north and south of the Century Freeway...."). '
2. Area Suitabilitv
The subject area is adequate in size and shape to carry out,
the intent of the Commercial Development designation of the+
General Plan, and accommodate the proposed development
relative to the proposed density, bulk of the structures,
parking, walls, fences, driveways, and other development;
standards required by the Zoning Ordinance. It is adjacent
to significant commercial development to the south and east.�
3. Compliance with Develooment Standards
The proposed General Plan Amendment would permit a zoning '
change that would insure that the development will meet all
the development standards required by the Zoning Ordinance. .
4. Compatibilitv
i
The proposed General Plan Amendment is located in an area of+
mixed land uses. Located to the north are Multi-family:
properties. To the south and east are significant amounts of•
commercial development. The proposed amendment would be a
logical extension of existing commercial uses.
5. Conditions of Approval
,•' The General Plan Amendement, zone change, and improvements
proposed, subject to the conditions recommended by the Site�
Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on.
the values of the surrounding properties or interfere withi
or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. �
. For project description and Conditions of Approval, see .'
Conditional Use Permit Case No. CUP 127, Resolution No.
2470, Tentative Parcel Map Case No. TPM 28, and Resolution ,
No. 2469.
6. Benefits to Communitv ;
The proposed General Plan Amendment will enhance the �
commercial development in the surrounding area, and provide
additional commercial services for the neighborhood.
2 ,
�
:4
7. Environmental�ssessment • !
The Director of Community Development has determined that no�
substantial environment impact will result from the proposed•
General Plan Amendment; therefore, a Negative Declaration;
has been filed in the Community Development Department and'
in the Office of the City Clerk.
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the;
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2467: �
1. Approving Resolution No. 2467 and recommending City
Council adoption of General Plan Amendment, Case No.6.
2. Certifying that the project will not have a significant�
effect on the environment and that a Negative
Declaration has been issued pursuant to the provisions'
of State CEQA Guideines. �
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map ,
2. Site Plan
3. Resolution No. 2467
�,
�'
i
� � f:\staffrpt\gpa6
i
I
i
I
3
�
� � '
;y 7. Environmental Assessment
The Director of Community Development has determined that no
substantial environment impact will result from the proposed
General Plan Amendment; therefore, a Negative Declaration
° has been filed in the Community Development Department and
in the Office of the City Clerk.
a
RECOMMENDATION• '
� Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the'
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2467:
1. Approving Resolution No. 2467 and recommending City�
Council adoption of General Plan Amendment, Case No.6.
2. Certifying that the project will not have a significant�
effect on the environment and that a Negative
Declaration has been issued pursuant to the provisions
of State CEQA Guideines.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map '
2. Site Plan �
3. Resolution No. 2467
f:\statfrpt\gpab ,
'. .
3
,:;:::.:
LOCATtON iViAP
,�-��� �_� � � � ;r 5 .� � ;: �-- �( . �
;
„P� I� �. � I � i�-... �i _ i� �
� � �
: � ;I '�i I �- ; �q . �_ ; I .
�� i I I �
11 9� '� 9� .J fas I So.e �� 9� eia� i� ��f i. i n I � ' .
-- -- AVENUE
�, .�... . _:;. �+.
� � .Ei �� y r_ - ` � �; . .
- W c V �__� �7Yo'I .q ;.op
�j Z t ' �� hJ_gi __ � � w� C�� = Sc•le � � .
Z w �_ � � a�..� �
I4 . ~ °
� Q F_ " i. il__� �.r. �.. r..w . ff aA�: S M V� �
' Q _ 1 ` • '
' �--'�°--= , c ° a � xti ba ''
. : � ----� , �AVn...~ ; s! .� � a !o " � S �"...
I�
� I nl i�u, er , I� � .I�'�fi ?�' .ii�pv' �l`f! �Vr.
� � �B (il ♦ u 1 � Z � �u . h ry � � /
i ,.i . .W fl i S/ r a �
• ' � t.
n� .n... FZ �� � N � 'Y ../ 4 aflr s ��1��.�„s ,� y
' W '_____�� W Q 'r " �p '* �•'
� �____'_'_ i • ''r �o � �.�`�` o ,
,; a --.—�;� __'._;'_�_...._ , ,;; C :e. � � ;
� W . , ��Sot 'i �r�. 4 (y�. �
Z ww� i ♦ : °" l� +�' /�
'* O 'l i� � 1 , J- � yp',� �
V . � � b• ie,... i .., i � p. nr A>> �4 ' .
V) g �d I � ` l � � ' �s q�U
� � *0. „��.i�as,� . " �wr.i� ry +�e��!/'
� W � . � n. ' ,.. ' I �S„� d a a�' � ' '�' ' ��7`
Q ,�P ia ; ,,,., i �,�v • BLOUN .` � a� �b % � a a
J 4 ,a i �,, ' ��, �5 "'�,,� a ,��� -
. I n .. ..,. '-----'��^'`-� � e " , o _A� , ,
Q � _ N � • . _ �", . � i�6� � � a . ,� �a { ' y � it .
^ ` ! S ¢ �.n � • 'fl � // ��
a U � �b� �. , :}� � �� r • a
� .� f5
( } i f �1?� n '
.\ ' l�. Y., yIf �.M w. . �.Y S 3 I Z ,� �
- , OLANDA ST. , ' ;" „ f ,
� �,... t ,, � � �.,, ,,,,, �,,; � � pN� •.� �•q o1
... ','i i. r �,� 1 a 1
� � �.� �,.. � t' t� 1 � F`.^ �o � �'� �� ��
. ; TR.4C'r t �� i F"..,,'� \ ��'� 1 % n:a��,Z � 1 :a�
/ J n 7-�1�" ?" � 5��� 1 �
?Y O I 1
� J. � F ' i ^� 1 !1 r�j-�. M f �W I �� O � 01 '� = $
0 0/'}/ -nr7. i ` r ro � :yl��� ?
.notR,�a hJ]I(d3.� —__ti_--- ` a. ior.a ��>^� ti � �;� °'� >� =,i a
� R4}�C 174?7�� ___ :iw�_ ` � �i?; b � 1 �r 1 r s .� . . ..
' � � ' � n. .u. --} .. : / l4 SO � . ' �� r' I
_ � s �---` � ,� � pN � •� ^ ° � �
�. .. �. I7W NG31C w i:. w � n. s•
.. � . � `_ _ N_,__ i, u � n �(Y ro� T � �o. I
�'� ' /J�,; /�j t __,,. �`��� ia4�� : ... ;I . . i �.s � i % i � .. b�� y �n , 1� ? Z'-1' I
. (b h�f h ' � �iidP•.y ___ •� Ia�oJ U �.fr � � . ti�� � S � , � 1 !�s 1 � �
�I w . 08
� ,..« ,� 03 __ ��"` i�n. F- 4/il �� T��`Y"�'�yrf7�' le.;.°�b b
� d 3� � � Z 1 t,�� 31 0
. � n UOI� i
. --m.t-�' /7ta1� w � ..1. i� 3�")3f ��° ��
� ' � p � �?00�.�_S�'il1Z?S�'� u. '�I _"Q `__.....� . �` 1 1r � ��.
� J • .,Kx',""- �s"� ' � n
g M L : i1i/o; ��_ ��?i�_: Y � �}�eb ���vi ; � �a!>'� I�p `es� S �1 �.a- � �
� , � -------;'t.."---- w I .r�
� 1/ ZO /D �Jn '._-_ a. a w iia 1
� � t�7� i ��71� ti . 0 j �Tvi�i . I/ ` I} I i u�� �� , C
R. n. i .r. ` � m .. `�� ,•
� u .�• w � ��•� b
. ` 1 i�} 4 ; f i ti'�l�a� � 7 � 3.. � ' �
i a- � "'1 � M �)lY� n� .
1 K �, V'� M i�h � S 4` + d) rs' . I .
�l` ;; M y Z` i T �
� r � i `
s .� , `
.. .,�...f. <:.. . '. �. �. > .
� . . . . —_. . .> .... I
1
, . ;
i
CASE N0. _ r� ����cu� � ; '
�" � z� , , i- � .
� . �
;
,,
� RESOLUTION NO. 2467 • ,
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION '
OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD RECOMMENDING AN �
' AMENDMENT TO THE LYNWOOD GENERAL PLAN
PERTAINING TO LOT 16 OF TRACT NO. 7099 '
MB PAGES 101-6-7 OF THE LOS ANGELES �
COUNTY RECORDER OFFICE, LOS ANGELES �
" COUNTY, LOCATED AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF
SOUTH ATLANTIC AVENUE AND OLANDA STREET, ;
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, •
pursuant to law, held a public hearing on the subject
, application; and ,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered �
all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Commision has determined that Commercial use ;
of this property would be consistent with the goals and policies
of the General Plarr, and ;
i
WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development has .
determined that the proposal will not have a negative effect on ;__
the environment, and has thereby declared a Negative Declaration '�
for the project; and
�-
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of ;
Lynwood hereby finds and determines as follows:
A. A commercial designation of this property would be �
compatible with surrounding land use.
B. The subject site would accommodate proposed develop- •
ment due to its size, location, and proximity to other and
commercial land uses.
;
,
C. The General Plan Amendment to Commercial would be
consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan.
D. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not be detri- �
mental to the properies surrounding the site.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of �
Lynwaod, based upon the aforementioned findings and determi- .
nations, hereby approves General Plan Amendment Case No. 6, and ;
recommends City Council adoption of a resolution changing the '
General Plan map designation for this property from Multi-
family Residential to Commercial.
;
. �
;
;
� f:\resolutn�reso2467 ��
1
, �
,:
ia Section 3. A�py of this resolution sha� be delivered to 1
'i the applicant.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1993, by members '
of the Planning Commission voting as follows: �
i
AYES: �
NOES: �
ABSENT: !
ABSTAIN: '
Errick R. Lee, Chairperson I
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sol Blumenfeld, Director William Rudell
Community Development Dept. interim City Attorney
:
a
.
� �
. f:\resolutn\reso2467 � . '
� �
�.
� ��
,
1
�
6
�
2 ;
' �
L � ;� , � • n � � ��'� � l�'I l � L �� �� V . ,_,.��_,..,,,,,,,.
, � DATE: December�4, 1993 ! _ _ �"_ ",I
„�_ �i�J
- TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director,� "
• Community Development Depart`i�ient
' SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 23909 - CASE NO. TPM 28
Applicant: Nathaniel Roberson '
PROPOSAL• �
The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Parcel Map to�
', consolidate three (3) parcels into one (T) lot in order to allow;
for the development of a 13,500 square foot two-story commercial
building at the northwest corner of Atlantic Avenue and Olanda
Street, in the R-3 (Multiple-family) zone. �
FACTS '
�
1. Source of Authoritv
Section 25-18, et seq., Subdivision Regulations of the;
Lynwood Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act,
Government Code Section 66410, et seq require that a parcel;_.
map be recorded for the consioldation of parcels. ' '
2. Propertv Location.. ,
The property is located on the on the northwest corner of ! .
, Atlantic Avenue and Olanda Street and will be comprised of�
three (3j parcels to be consolidated (see attached location�
map)•
;
3. Propezty Size �
,
The subject property is a regular shaped lot approximately;
29,643 square feet.
4. Land Use Desiqnation �
d
The General Plan designation for the property is multi-
family Residential and the Zoning Classification is R-3. �
The surrounding land use designations are as follows:
General Plan Zonina
North - Multi-family Residential North - R-3
� � �
' South - Commercial South - C-2,R-2
East - Commercial East - CB-1
West -.Cluster Housing West- R-2 , I
6. Pro�ect Characteristics '�
, �
The applicant proposes to consolidate three (3) parcels into� j
one (1) lot. This will allow for the development of a two-
story, 13,500 square feet commercial building on a 24,643�
° square foot lot. '
' �
� f:\staffrpt\tpm28-1 ' � � I
1 �
; ;
;
7. Site Plan Rev�[a •
I
+ At its regular meeting on September 30, 1993, the Site Plan
Review Committee recommended approval to the Planning
Commission subject to conditions and requirements.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
Staff analysis of this proposed subdivision map include the
following findings: (a) Design of the proposed site; and
(b) Consistency of the proposed site with the General Plan.
Confiauration Of The Pr000sed Site Subdivision :
a. The design of the proposed lot subdivision shows the
proposed lots to provide adequate egress and ingress.
b. The proposal is meant for the consolidation of three (3) ;
parcels into one (1) lot in order to allow better
utilization of the property.
c. The site is physically suitable for the proposed use.��
The parcels are substantially flat and able to support
the intensity and type of development proposed.
Consistencv Of The Site With The General Plan
a. The size and location of the proposed project does not
significantly change the character of the existing I
environment.
b. The proposed consolidation is consistent with the Zoning �
Classification of minimum lot sizes in the commercial I
zone and the General Plan designation of Commercial.
Environmental Assessment.
The Director of Community Development Department has determined '
that no substantial environment impact will result from the
proposed project; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been
filed in the Community Development Department and in the office
of the City Clerk. Development Department and the office of the I
City Clerk. I
I
RECOMMENDATION(51• �
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2469.
1. Certifying that the project will not have a significant ,
effect on the environment and that a Negative Declaration
has been issued pursuant to the provisions of State CEQA
Guildlines.
2. Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 28, subject to the stated
conditions and requirements. I
I
i
Attachments: i
1. Location Map I
2. Resolution No. 2469 '
3. Tentative Parcel Map No. 23909 I
f:\s[affrp[\tpm28•1 . i
�
�
2 �
�
� I
- �z �����- �� -- `0 N S
� � ��
�� � � �
;
I f
;
�
� : « °
— ; -
__ � _
i , . i - ____..: _ . _ � „�..
,
� 1 RW� � J �
w
� 7 l �� I� n� � \ �
. . ' � i�' � �u� Ieriw Y-� .�b ls t
. �f ���, ihrctr ` w 4. i'0 n �.,
' .. �•• + e ^ `f;�',e� ;ocru: I �� iyed .
,\ I�� M iI' q � a�
� ,{ • �n ♦ nr q� / qt
d6 /0'���7� , �rn� I � er.zr � �ii�ti l`C� _ v iC�� I �` ` �
7 +' IQt[tf A / i � Q�.F , b y,t t . .
' !/ pL /l �
„ r �
i.c � a ' ' � " D ----- O
� t i' 1�rT•' a� �'(SC� � `�' l/Lri i 9o[t/ ,�, � i ��I.CI �i � O/itt ; .� b �, .
• ° o�
N 1 °� � 4: "1 � r
r � � :C � .,..t¢ Sf ` � i. ....�._. � � .��.� - �tvlT ; y � L'C r r c. �
MT
q C 1E W� ,-�! • �r _ � *,.�__ i LoIU � ._ _ r• - rm_'
p � , .. 1 1 � 1 /f ; Z � �' _.ri_ � : £ � 1� � YOIh : i �
°� 1�sT�ii. ��tl1Ag ll J NI �I. S r w'm �
� Ay� T,� K:.�'"r 1Lar�i � BoLT/ �'1 N �___ m .. ' !1� �� ; �
a i i �tti c r ` � dT9ti o W W
1 i 4..t '� � e � ia' n �taCYl � i` : ___ ' O,ap
� S °� IZ � 11w R+ � � � � �.fr . �..� �. � :l��f��'^F � ; n � �/ �C/ V.
� ` p.s �'� sr ��Hl� s+� �f : e�t r �IE1t/ �^ — . .'�'_ ., ,
fs�y�� a � 1 � ' � �� pl� y r'_�1 �rc. ^� i�ir. . . � . .
� . , �•r °t j � ° • 1 � 't h 1 � Z( ., . Ch___ �+___—N :CC�I�� a�9t1 � . . ..
�'�_ �t ��� 1? 1 � .����e.y�. —r—__ J�c�J�I'v Q�tnt�.
����C, �Iq [ � t �.:�a�x � J u.��.7n—�e��_ / / � / W W
r I ch:-C1 2 L+M ' W i +.1 ` 1 � e 1 � b
. $ i O l p =f T � i � ~ I. ' ' � . p W ..
� ff �w ° � � 1 . � � � u �j 'r �t
�1 �� :si�{��r,��.y�h �� , rJ, � /o / .
�-::r'r r ,�p,� q: � „�� ,� ' , � l �d `' 1 �
� 1 i � h 1 y � p Cb � .s � .r ` . ' �. � ; v a , � : �
��o O : � y . 1 �� . ,. .�v V , '� V
',�, b.; `., � � QN d O , ,fi� „,�, �w ., ., r' ».,,
� � � .> �� ��� ' • 1S daNG''10 _
I , � J„ - � {,5 r f ` F .� . �:"��� ' iG V . . _' \_ k .
' s iS J i•� .� t �t, r �. .
J° f � ` `.
j �/l fi �-'° , �` i �ru i � .. � ,,., a � � D
�'� � I• . 4 . , y
t 9 y �/ a�f9 � N � �
� , �', � � r � Y - -1 • , � ,-- °- . ,.H �� � ., v ` � .
. �,r � =: " s � � �� r
i q �� o, nr r i w, � Ri,
h ._ „q � s \ , ` . � . .
1
f� � y
N�OlB
P �c �„ D
H. , g ti ,.., „ a,r�i � . F� a --I � .
'. ��,�� f � : i : 5� . 5r `� � a1 ; .., � .�. I ' � d m ;
I y
'i� • a.�'. � � �� ,.
3 �s . � i
� k
on� � N � , ..,, � 9 y . � 4
/S
, u° �s� �� ; Ci ��� 8 . (A
o�� .
;
.
4 '`
�
��
�
_ ___.___. ._._ .
�
i °'�� L � � �
. ^
... O �
�
" � i ..m Z
� lo9r � � .. , . , m -
, �
, � i - : ' D
._., .
� _, . .._._ee.:..F_.____.r _. `----^ n Q
� _'__'__ �. �
D . „ m ,�------ m
.,, ,. < 4ene� � he{t' Z� `�` ,
C ..,,, „
rs I'r1 ,,, �
2 � ..,, f*1 g� �
F� C � i � •.n, i . .
m .. �. ,, �' y
^ 1j y ��Ft/ , �I � .
--- «. - '_y `�r D
ss ., . •, --r.:u--*C� �(�d_' < rn
i � ,�. �` -- f 1�'=,7 � C m
,. , �
+` �anei �,� ---n-- � "�' = m
p
. = � :i �= a � .
� �...�....-�-�----..�.,, -�e + . ..v r ,a
. —�,
3nN3ne -- ---
I � '. i " �i� . ,.,o r„ .o�r sT . � „ T
' � .I �` i' � U . I . I I ) �" ��. �
ul ' h � �. � su_,I .. � �. � � I �.EO V
.`I .)� � �I
d�dUV N011�d�O� �
• •
� • RESOLUTION NO. 2469 • �
i
�
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
. COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD ;
APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. �
' 23909 TO CONSOLIDATE THREE (3) PARCELS �
INTO ONE (1), AS SAOWN ON COUNTY
ASSESSOR'S BOOK #6186-013-024,025 AND
036, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS !
�.
' ANGELES.
,
� WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood '
pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject '
application; and �
WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development has ?
determined that the proposal will not have a negative effect on ;
the environment, and has thereby declared a Negative Declaration
• for the project; and ,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully �
considered all pertinent testimony offered in the case as ''
presented at the public hearing; and ;
WHEREAS, the preparation, filing and recordation of �^
Parcel Map is required for development; and
Section 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find +
and determine that said Tentative Parcel Map No. 23909 in the �
CB-1 (Control Business District) zone, should be approved for ;
the following reasons: �
A. The subdivision meets all the applicable requirements �
and conditions imposed by the State Subdivision Map '
, Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the Lynwood �
Municipal Code. '
B. The proposed consolidation of lots is consistent with : •
' the applicable elements of the General Plan and the r
Official Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lynwood.
' C. Proper and reasonable provisions have been made for j
' adequate ingress and egress to the subdivision of the ;
lot. ;
D. Proper and adequate provisions have been made for all '
public utilities and public services, including �
sewers. . ; +
� I
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood �
hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 23909 in the CB-1 �
(Control Business District) zone, subject to the following „
conditions.
� ;
� �
i
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
�
1. The 'applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City '
Departments.
�.
, 2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a;
Statement of Acceptance stating that he has read, � �
understands, and agrees to the conditions imposed by the +.
Planning Commission, before any building permits are �
issued. a
i
,
f:\resolutn\reso2469 - � i � i
� � � �
1 ! �
1
� I
� � PLANNING DIVISION �
3. Within twenty-four (24) months after approval or
conditional approval of Tentative Parcel Map, the
subdivider shall file with the City of Lynwood, a;
Final Map in substantial conformance with the Tentative ;
Parcel Map as conditionally approved, and in conformance
with the Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision
Regulations of the City of Lynwood.
I
4. No grading permit or building permit shall be issued prior
to recordation of final map or another appropriate
instrument approved by the City of Lynwood.
5. The Final Parcel Map shall be filed with the City Engineer
of the City of Lynwood.
6. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in
sanitary condition upon approval of the Tentative Parcel
Map and shall be maintained in a neat and orderly
manner at all times.
7. Extension of the Tentative Map approval shall only �
be considered if the applicant or his/her
representative, submits a written request for extension
to the Community Development Department stating the reasons
for the request, at least thirty (30) days before map _
approval is due to expire, pursuant to, and in compliance
with Section 25-18 of the Sulidivision Regulations of the _.
City of Lynwood. �
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS�ENGINEERING
S. Dedicate a five (5) wide strip of property along Cookacre
Avenue. ,
9. Dedicate required property at the northeast corner of
- Cookacre/Olanda Street to accommodate a radius.
10. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered
Civil Engineer. Property is located within loo year flood �
level zone per flood boundary map. The owner has to build i
the foundation pad one (1) foot above flood level. No
building permits will be issued prior to the approval of
grading plan by City Engineer. I
11. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk curb and gutter and required �
pavement along Olanda Street and Atlantic Avenue.
I
12. Construct full width sidewalk in parkway along Olanda �
street. ,
13. Close existing drive approaches and construct proposed '
drive approaches per City standards along Olanda Street and I
Atlantic Avenue and close existing drive approach along ' �
Cookacre Avenue. I
I
14. Construct two (2) wheelchair ramps at northwest Atlantic , I
Avenue and Olanda Street, northeast Cookacre Avenue and I
Olanda Street.
15. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected
separately. Construct laterals as necessary. I
16. Install eight (8) 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood i
standards: two (2) along Cookacre Avenue, two (2) along
Atlantic Avenue and four (4) along Olanda Street. Tree ' I
wells to be installed where required. Species to be �
determined by Public Works. A permit to install the trees ,
is required by the Engineering Division. Exact locations �
� of the trees will be determined at the time the permit is �
issued.
2 �
, i
I
I
I
, 17. Regrade parkw� and landscape with grass�long perimeter of
`� property.
18. Provide and install four (4) marbelite street pole with
light fixture, underground services and conduits: one (1)
along Cookacre Avenue and two (2) along Olanda Street and •
one (1) along Atlantic Avenue.
19. Underground all utilities.
20. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all
off-site improvements.
21. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or '
fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer.
The work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired
by the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from ,
the Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing �
any work.
22. Widen five (5') foot roadway along Cookacre Avenue and
construct sidewalk, parkway curb and 24" wide gutter to
match adjacent property. �
23. Relocate existing storm drain catch basin along Cookacre.
24. Remove existing parking lights (on-site) along Cookacre _.
Avenue and Olanda Street that will encroach into dedicated ,
R/ W . .,
25. Upgrade existing fire hydrant at northeast corner of Olanda � i
Street and Cookacre as per City standards.
26. Relocate existing street lights per City standards along �
Atlantic Avenue as it falls in proposed new D/A.
Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered , I
to the applicant. i
APPROVED and ADOPTED this th day of 1993, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES: '
�
NOES: �
. �
ABSENT: I
ABSTAIN: I
� �
I
I
Errick R. Lee, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPR0�7ED AS TO FORM: ,
�
I
Sol Blumenfeld, Director William Rudell I
Community Development Department Interim City Attorney
' �
I
I
I
f:\resolutn\reso2469
3 I
I
��� � DATE: December�4, 1993 �J�+� �� ��' �
� �
' TO: PLANNING COMMISSION �}� i�'d`l. _-_--�- ��
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director�
Community Development Dep ment �
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 127
Applicant: Nathaniel Roberson ,
Proposal•
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit
to develop a 13,500 square feet, two-story commercial building ;
with office rental space and retail stores at the northwest
corner of Atlantic Avenue and Olanda Street in the R-3
(MUltiple-family Residential) zone.
Facts•
1. Saurce of Authoritv
Section 25-32.1.5 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that�
all new commercial development in the City of Lynwood obtain
approval of a Conditional Use Permit from the Planning,
Commission.
2. Property Location �
The project is located on the northwest corner of Atlantic
Avenue and Olanda Street and is comprised of three (3);
parcels to be consolidated. (see attached Location Map).
3. Property Size
The subject property is a rectangular lot approximately �
29,643 square feet. ,
4. Existincr Land Use
The subject site is flat, and vacant: The surrounding land'
uses are as follows:
General Plan Zoning
North - Multi-family Residential North - R-3 i
South - Commercial South - C2,R-2 �
East - Commercial East - CB-1 I
West - Cluster Housing West - R-2
i
5. Proiect Characteristics: � I
The applicant proposes to develop a two-story, 13,500 square
foot commercial building with office and retail rental',
spaces. The proposal will provide for fifty-four (54)
parking spaces for the commercial building. Two (2) handicap'
parking spaces are provided. Approximately eight percent
(8�) landscaping is provided for the subject site.
�
6. Site Plan Review
At its regular meeting on September 30, 1993, the Site Plan
Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and
recommended approval to the Planning Commission, subject to
specific conditions and requirements. ' .
� �
� I
; I
1
i .
� .
7, Zonin Enforc�nt History � t
c� None of Record.
;
8, Public Resoonse
�
,' None of record at the time this report was prepared. �
i
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: �
�
1. Consistencv with General Plan '
The proposed land use is inconsistent with the existinq �
zoning classification (R-3) Multiple-Family and General Plan,
designation of Residential. A zone change and General Plan'.
Amendment have been filed concurrently with this application.;
If the zone change and General Plan Amendment are approved,,
this proposal will be consistant. �
2. Site Suitabilitv
�' The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the;
proposed development relative to structures, parking, walls,,
fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features
" required by the Zoning Ordinance. The property is a logical'
extension of the commercial development to the south. '
3. Compatibility i
_
The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of'_
� commercial and residential development. Multi-family�
� Residential uses located to the north of the proposed use,�
and significant amounts of commercial development are located;
to the south and east of this property. The proposed
development will be separated by a wall from the multi-family�
development to the north and will not have a significant;
impact on that property.
' ;
, 4. Compliance with Development Standards ;
The proposa2 meets the development standards required by thea
Zoning Ordinance with respect to setbacks, lot coverage,
building height and density. �
5. Conditions of Aonroval � �
' �
, The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions' �
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will ,not have�
" a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties
or interfere with or endanger the pub2ic health, safety or'
welfare.
6. Benefits to Communitv
r
The proposal will assist in upgrading the commercial use in{
the area and support the commercial goals of the General
Plan. ,
i
7. Environmental Assessment "
The Director of Community development has determined that no�
substantial environmental impact will result from the
proposed development; therefore, a Negative Declaration has;
been filed in the Community Development Department and in the'
office of the City Clerk. �
i
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff.respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning�
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2470.
� � r
2 .
�
r
I
�
1. Finding t�t the Conditional Use PerFiiit, Case No. 127,
'� will not have a significant effect on the environment and,
certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate.
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 127, subject to the '
stated conditions and requirements.
ATTACHMENTS•
1. Location Map i
2. Resolution No. 2470
3. Site Plan
I
�
I
I
I
i
� I
I
I
i
1 '
I
I
i ,
f:�staffrpt\cup127 �
� I
i
3 �
I
_. ------------ --.. .
, -- --- __ .._ __.. .-- --...._._. ....------ ._.
� �
LOCATION iVIAP
P ,�O�-� �r � � �I ;I� �; .i � ` � �l
em M i I. 1 � I ��-,,, , ;�
:i � i�,. ,i .�
i .�
i r. %I t. .i�r=�Iroel���. lu ,,.. �i'nn ��..i n i '
-- -- AVENUE •
„ ,�.. , _a ,a1,
� t o� o- y .� ._ �. I • ..
:� it : t �
W :�� �_'ci_'� �iVo7 v o '
w ' �' 3 = • ��"g�., G ,•.,o
Z Z t � :� L �J_nr __ � � � �', f a .
lyJ � `- �'� - � i ni� •t i. . .r. ff ~ 7 ` • t i.� �p a e , .
Q a L - u i• :; '� � ,� ab �a''� �,'�' ...''�:
-1- ;------- iav„ `� f� '` a te S 3 ,.
, � G .. , n ti � y�.•�:.
� , i � •
� � .rai. •. � � .I �.'� � �+.. . ' 4� y r � f! bV '
� si � � �
� /8 � �� � � Z `a � ( a • ..�M 4
I ? ,, i.•.i. w SI iS/ f�.a °���-V
ir � ill.i� F � 1 y_3 (� i V1 �l. \ �4 i/I 4e1 ��s �� ` w- ` �1 ��. 4
� w
�� �
. ♦ ° Q 's ro !1 � . a .:
W W �t .
______� ...,
� � L-_____' ' I
ji V'_--1.7 ...�..•-�{ -.ao-^- C •�y 1 � ``1� V �
� a ... . I . � ,. .. s� 1
W « � ��60� ^i ir�, � q R�{�(��. °, ' °i
Z w.. i w ��: f�r ��.
.A O 1 , T � `a a a ye'�� .
V � ' b� ie�. . � .. � ` �� n � �! y �� _
� ' � B \O\ �• I ` o y r/ ` ' • ls ` � O + �I
' 4 �, � I .r. i ��s�� ` / " a S:. �j`k, t � ���'.
W �p . ,.. � ,.. � �S d ` a . , �\ `.
� � ia � ,., . i �,�9 BLOUN ," x � �b � � ,�a
/b � ro 4 �� �
'� ll/ i � I `r
J : I � � �6 . �.'� a 'yi
H n .. .,,. '------;-�`^'--� o s � � �,. �' c . �(
Q _ N i � w �In6�l. � � df � '� a��; � .� /f�
: : ` � ~ ` 1 S
U � . ' � �rn ' . � '� � // a v
�� \� . ' �ti�3 ��' 4�� � r ,�.� i �s
; '� . . . . , 1 ��Y I L 'f n y '
._. � �. +�. �•� �, �.e t , "'3 I i c ��
�, OLANDA ST. . ;" A �, s. �
� . m.r " � q /u.�� ' i - r • `D�1
�'`, n - ` � r �• � ° °� °
�::. •,1 � } u.� . • z t . . Q � �� 1�'� f�
; 1 "� q ,r � � . �.. F , . 1 ' ��1 ^'� nF:b�l a 1' �°j,:?1 '_ �
g � ? � /3GO/ � � ',�' 7 ^i "� Z i ` �-�� �J/ i
� :I � � `� T � O�
F I tit� M Plj'f�lTti J o
� 0 // - . - r.. - . - ���o�Ti -- . � r co� ��ro :`y� T��`�Z'� ?
.1941Q,I� fvlllta�C -__- ' a.o. N �� �' �^: >� ?��T �
,� ��
11 4J.gj0 12�J1� `-__--��.----F` � 1� M. b ° � t r. �' � �
. .. . �n , i�. L a t � /745 �i ?� � r . �r r�
a ���, ��--- � ' � ,•a•T ° oi.
... : .. `— ---J�,./ic31S : iA Q y •� . R9
.. `,:: � �. � �o• 9C.
i�
'� 1 1 � /� ° 6 —_ i 1',�,. "i]4�� ... ��, .� n. �r o i % �� � b�� ,j�1 ? ZI� .
M Ct� h ' : �SG1P . �--- ; �a�n3 U .sr � � Y � � ?� - 1 �
.w , � :a � � r.,�, �' �
. ,.« , W ��? i'�.." F— Lia7o i:� 3'~'Y'i��rti� r ''' � �
� d �� 03 i � _ y i�� Z = ti ��- �_. , y�b . a.
�� --d'i;�` ii�ioll i ._ SZ � _'�i. �. Yr�i;� 7 a a
p ?70� '� � !
' � �? y S � i __^'llll.?� , ,i. ' _J __ ... _ .r � � Z� ry' �e
� � 6 : t1t�o � N_ �J?��_ a Y C /))eo i �n7�1 � � /�7' I�p :�ok'� ��" � ?' ��� A
' t/ 20 /D , i �—'_'_'_i�ti""' Q w I . r � �
i �. . i •
, ;�ti✓n �� � a. ��. �Ifi 117i1• r I}oiD� �r 0/
i l9 U `� �` '� � � I i��. Cd�
a r. ' i r . ��
� lit}G i �. .a Y iil�oi . ' � .'� 3' ; � ' .
4
0- � '.� I M 11)1'l I �s. � .
� a �: 1' MI�ti� h ♦df 1fi . . .
� y �V al i� � 1 V � � I
� .qS
� � • mb i
r � �
_.,..�.� ... __.c._�-...� a ' .
... , __.. , ,. � '.
. . � .. ... � ,
I
I
1
+ I
I
I �
I
CASE N0. � �� -1 �
_ � �� c� �� , ; �
— _ �
1 �ESOLUTION NO. 2470 •
,,
�
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
TAE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL ;
USE PERMIT NO. 127 FOR THE DEVEIAPMENT OF !
A 13,500 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING
(OFFICE AND RETAIL SPACES) AT THE ,
NORTHWEST CORNER OF ATLANTIC AVENUE AND �
OLANDA STREET THE CB-1 (PLANNED BUSINESS)
ZONE.
WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, `
conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent
testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined
that the proposal will not have a negative effect on the�,
environment, and has therefore declared a Negative Declaration :
for the project; and
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for
development of a new commercial use in area designated as;.,
Commercial under the General Plan and in a CB-1 (Planned
Business) zone.
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and �
determines as follows:
A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and
shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls,
landscaping, driveways and other development features �
required by the Official Zoning Ordinance.
B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, will �
not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding ; I
properties or interfere with or endanger the public,
health, safety, or welfare.
C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current;
zoning regulations and site plan submitted and reviewed
by the Site Plan Review Committee.
i
D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not� I
adversely affect the General Plan. �
E. The proposed development will aid in upgrading the area j
and will act as a catalyst in fostering other quality' i
commercial developments. �
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, I
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby I
approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 127, provided the
following conditions are observed and complied with at all times.
COMMUNITY DEVELAPMENT DEPARTMENT �
I
General
1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable I
regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform•
Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code.
I
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or I
structures thereon shall be first reported to the Community;
Development Department, Planning Division, for review. ,
: I
1 I
I
; I
�
I
j f
3. The applica� and/or his representa�ive shall sign a�
': Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read,�
understands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution
prior to issuance of any building permits. ;
REDEVELOPMENT DIVISION
;
4, The project design shall provide for access and circulation�
, of vehicular, pedestrian, and emergency vehicle traffic in a'
safe, logical and efficient manner, both to the site (off-�
' site) and within the site (on-site). ;
5. The proposed design shall be compatible with existing
developments in the area in terms of scale, height, bulk,'
materials, colors, and the preservation of privacy. �
;
6. The main entrance to the primary building should provide for;
independent access to the physically impaired. !
7. The street address shall be displayed in a prominent;
location on the street side of the building. All address;
numbers shall be easily visible to vehicular and/or�
pedestrian traffic. The street address and room number
shall be no less than four (4) inches in height and shall be,
of a color contrasting to the background to which they are�
attached. '
8. On-site lighting shall be installed along all vehicular;
access ways and major walkways. Such lighting shall be..
� directed onto'the driveways and walkways within the! I
development and away from adjacent properties. .
;
9. The parking aisle width shall be twenty-five (25') feet.' '
Exits from parking lot shall be clearly posted with stop�
, signs. � ,
l0. Cart return areas if applicable, must be provided and shown
on the site plan. �
11. All landscaped areas shall be landscaped with a mixture of;
ground cover, shrubs and trees, and may include decorate
rock, sculpture, and walkways, within the major parking�
area. i
12. Within the main parking area, one (1) tree shall be provided� I
. for each ten (l0) parking spaces. The trees shall be of a;
species that provides a broad canopy.
i
13. All required landscaping materials shall be not less than',
the following sizes: ,
o Trees - at least fifteen gal2on
o Shrubs - at least five gallon
;
o Grounds cover - lawn shall be oF sod and shall cover.
the proposed area. � ' �
i
i
14. No sign shall be erected without a sign permit. !
�
15. The Director or his designee shall issue the sign permit;
' upon approval by the Planning and Redevelopment Divisions. a
16. Only individual illuminated channel letters sha21 be� �
permitted. , i
i .
� � f:resolutn:reso2470 . � � '
�
, ;
�
Z
' �
,
;
, 17. Uses within �venty-five (75'j feet o�nd fronting on a?
+ major street shall have monument identification signs. �
18. Billboards signs are prohibited. ;
19. There shaTl be a periodic review of the applicant's'
compliance with all of the requirements, at a time speaified �
by the Director, but in no event longer than 12 months. :
_ 20. The applicant or his/her successor in interest shall provide ;
evidence of good-faith compliance with all of the'
requirements at the time of said review. ,'
21. If, at the end of the time period established by the%
Director or his/her designee, the applicant or his/her'
successor in interest has failed to comply with all of thei
requirements, the Director or his/her designee, shall notifyj
the Planning Commission of his/her findings and recommend
', such action as deemed appropriate, according to the Lynwood,
Municipal Code. '
i
� ' PLANNING DIVISION
22. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood!
main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving
the proposed development.
i
23. Construction shall commence within six (6) months from date,
of issuance of building permits. '
. j
z4. This permit shall.become void one hundred twenty (120j days,
unless extended, after the use permitted has been abandoned
or has ceased to be actively exercise. :
Landscaoinq �
25. The applicant is required to submit a landscape plan drawn'
by a licensed landscape architect to the satisfaction of the"
Director of Community Development prior to any building;
permit being issued, . ,
26. The amount of landscaping required shall be provided and'
consistent with the proposed landscape plan. . �
27.. A1'1 other existing mature trees and other significant�
vegetation should be preserved and integrated into the
landscape plan to the satisfaction of the Community'
Development Director or his/her designee. �
28. All landscaping shall be permanently maintained. Lawn and�
, ground covers are to be tritnmed or mowed regularly, with all;
planted areas kept free of weeds and debris. All plantings�
are to be kept in a healthy and growing condition. An�
automatic sprinkler or irrigation system shall be provided'
and maintained in working condition.
29. Where vehicles are to be parked immediately adjacent to a�
, public or private street or alley, a decorative masonry wall
" a maximum of thirty-six inches in height measured from the�'
finished surface of the parking area, shall be provided.•
There must be minimum landscaping to screen wall from street,
view and accessibility.
30. Prior to the installation or construction.of any fence or1
masonry wall within any zone, the property owner shall�
obtain a permit and submit the following information to the�
Planning Division of the Community Development Department: •,
i
3
� � I`
. i
i
' a. A simple�lot plan showing the lo�tion of fence or ;
. masonry wall in relation to the property lines, heights,i
proposed materials, and openings or gates to provide
access.for vehicles and pedestrians. {
b. For masonry walls a buiiding permit shall be applied for;
upon approval of the plot plan described above. All"
masonry walls of any height shall meet the requirements,
for masonry construction as defined in Chapter 24 of the�
Uniform Building Code. A fee based on the valuation of�
the proposed construction.shall be paid to the Building'
Division.
31. All fences or masonry walls shall be required to maintain�
adequate pedestrian access for the purpose of safety and,
convenience. A thirty-six (36) inch or three foot clearr
gate or opening shall be provided to all enclosures for',
pedestrian and wheelchair access. Pedestrian and,vehicular�
access shall be provided. ;
;
32. AT1 fences or masonry walls shall be required to be;
installed with a ffnished, esthetically pleasing side facing,
out toward adjacent properties or the public right-of-way to
the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development or:
, his/her designee.
;
33. A eight (8) foot high decorative block wall shall be!_
installed along the perimeter of the property to the north�
of the property line abutting the residential zone to the?_.
satifaction of the Director of Community Development or'
his/her designee. '
34. The applicant must provide a trash enclosure consistent with,
the materials and color of the main building(s), with gates,'
on the site of the subject property. The trash enclosure;
shall be built as per Building and Safety Division: i
standards. , '
j
' PARKING i
1
35. Parking shall be a minimum of 54 stalls for customer parking� �
only. {
36. Each off-street parking space shall not be less than twenty;
' {20) feet in length and nine (9) feet in width, exclusive of;
access driveways or aisles, except as noted below:
a. Any standard parking space that is immediately adjacent;
to a wall, structural column, light standards, or i
similar obstruction on one or both of its longer sides�
or in an enclosed space shall be at least ten (10') feet.
in width and twenty (20') feet in length. ,
b. At a minimum two parking spaces designed for the�
handicapped shall be provided. These spaces may be�
provided as follows: ,
1. Dimensions. The minimum dimensions of each'
automobile parking stall for the handicapped shall'
be not less than fourteen (14) feet in width byj,
twenty (20) feet in lenqth. Said stalls shall be�
lined to provide a nine (9) foot parking area and a�
five (5) foot loading and unloading area or;
2. Two (2) spaces may be provided within a twenty-three�
(23) foot wide area, lined to provide a nine (9)�
_ foot parking area on each side of a five (5) foot�
• loading and unloading area. The minimum length of
each parking space shall be twenty (20) feet. t
4
. , I
. 3. Loca�n. Al1 parking spaces �r the handicapped ;
�1 shall be located adjacent to the main entrance of;
the facility for which the spaces are provided. The
• parking spaces shall be positioned so that the!
handicapped persons shall not be required to walk or'
wheel behind parked vehicles.
. 37. The applicant shall submit elevation drawings to the�
Planning Division showing the exterior building designl
including the specification of colors and materiais. Prior�
to the issuance of building permits, the design of the
subject building including color and materials, must be
approved by the Director of Community Development. �
_ 38. Prior to the installation, display, enlarging, modifying,�
relocating or changing of signs, a permit must be obtained'
from the Department of Community Development, Planning°
Division. i
39. Central heating, cooling ventilation equipment, swimming�
pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical devices
shall be screened from public view. Such equipment shall be;
screened from surrounding properties and streets and'
operated so that they do not disturb the peace, quiet and
" comfort of neighboring residents, in accordance with the�
City's Noise Ordinance. All means of access to the;
referenced equipment shall be designed and installed so as'
to prevent access to unauthorized persons and shall be;
approved by the Building and Safety Division. �
, 40. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally'
compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent� I
buildings. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc. I
shall be installed without the prior written approval of the� i
Director of Community Development and required building' �
permits as per plan.
41. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 1319 to insure variation.and �
I
esthetically pleasing color schemes for buildings in'
Redevelopment Areas along major City streets, i.e. Long.
Beach Blvd., Atlantic Ave., Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., or'
Imperial Highway, the exterior of any building or structure�
- shall be painted with a color within a range of colors
approved by.the Community Development Director. ;
42. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in a;
sanitary condition pending construction and shall be'
maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times.
Failure to comply may result in revocation of the:
Conditional Use Permit. ,
43. Entity will eliminate graffiti from the structures, fences;
and any accessory building on a daily basis.
Maintenance of sidewalk, parking area, gutters and any , �
surrounding area will be done a minimum of twice a day
(before starting operations and before closing). a
44. A cover sheet of approved Conditions must be attached to;
plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety'
Division. �
45. Any violation of said conditions in this resolution may'
result in revocation or modification of the Conditional use '
Permit by the issuing body at a regularly scheduled meeting.'
46. Entity/Agency will maintain a pro-active approach to the'
elimination of graffiti from any structe, fences or' .
accessory building at the site. Daily inspections will be�
, conduted in order to have all graffiti removed by 12:00 p.m.?
.
I
i
f:/resolutn:reso2470 -
�
;
5
f I
47. Maintenance � sidewalk, parking are�'! gutters and all��
� surrounding area will be done at least once a day before,
starting of operation.
48. Parking area will be maintained at all times either by the �
agent/owner employees or a commercial parking cleaning;
- company. �
�
� 49. Entity/Agency will not allow/authorize any other uses except ;
those listed in their business license.
50. All entries to the parking lot area will be posted in{
accordance with Section 22658 of the California Vehicle'
Code. �
,
�
;
PUBLIC WORKS �
- 51. Dedicate a five (5) wide strip of property along Cookacre�
Avenue.
. �
52. Dedicate required property at the northeast corner of�
Cookacre/Olander Street to accommodate a radius. '
53. Submit a gradinq plan prepared and signed by a registered";
Civil Engineer. Property is located within l0o year flood' ,
level zone per flood boundary map. The owner has to build��
the foundation pad one (1) foot above flood level. No;.
building permits will be issued prior to the approval of'
grading plan by City Engineer.
54. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk, curb and gutter and required'
pavement along Olanda Street and Atlantic Avenue. '
55. Construct full width sidewalk in parkway along Olanda'
Street.
�
56. Close existing drive approaches and construct proposed drive;
, approaches per City standards along Olanda Street and
Atlantic Avenue and close existing drive approach along`
Cookacre Avenue. '
57. Construct two (2) wheelchair ramps at northwest Atlantici
Avenue and Olanda Street, northeast Cookacre Avenue and�
Olanda Street.
,
58., Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected�
separately. Construct laterals as necessary. ' ,
59. Install eight (8) 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood; i
standards: two (2j along Cookacre Avenue, two (2) along
' Atlantic Avenue and four (4) along Olanda Street. Tree�
wells to be installed where required. Species to be; I
determined by Public Works. A permit to install the trees�
is required by the Engineering Division. Exact locations of
the trees will be determined at the time the permit is.
issued. ?
60. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass along perimeter of '
property. ,
- 61. Provide and install four (4) marbelite street pole with'
light fixture, underground services and conduits: One (1);
along Cookacre Avenue and. two (2) along Olanda Street and:
one (1) along Atlantic Avenue.
62. Underground all utilities. � I
,
63. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all� �
off-site improvements. r
f:/resolutn/reso2470
6 a
i
;
' I
,
.•r ,
., 64. All required �ter meters, meter service�anges and/or fire�
's protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The�
work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by'
the deyeloper. The contractor must obtain a permit from the �
Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing 'any .
work.
65. Widening five (5) foot roadway along Cookacre Avenue and'
, construct sidewalk, parkway curb and 24" wide gutter to
match adjacent'property. '
66. Relocate existing storm drain catch basin along Cookacre.
67. Remove existing parking lights (on-site) along Cookacre
Avenue and Olanda Street that will encroach into dedicated�
,. R/W.
68. Upgrade existing fire hydrant at the northeast corner of
Olanda Street as per City standards. �
69.. Relocate existing street light along Atlantic Avenue as it'
falls in proposed new D/A.
FIRE DEPARTMENT .
70. Plans for_required fire sprinkle system shall be submitted _,
to this department for approval prior to installation.
71. Provide knox box to building.
Section 3. A copy of Resolution No. 2470 shall be delivered
to the applicant.
,
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this th day of , 1993, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: .
AYES• .
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
' Erick R. Lee, Chairman
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ',,
Sol Blumenfeld, William Rudell
Director Community Development Interim City Attorney
:
' ;. i
� � f:\resotutn\reso2670 � � � � � i
i
� �
i
. . � . . . . . , �
_ . . . ' 7 . . ',
I
� �. � � a
. . � ' . � � � � � +
. , . . .. ,. � . � �
,. �
r �� �"� � T '- �'.t.� o.
�� • AG� � :.: . i i i_;,i �
-�_�.
CAS� N0. , .�.(o
DATE: December 14, 1993
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director�
Community Development Dep ment
SUBJECT: Variance Case No. 26
Applicant: Mario Saldana Rios
Proposal•
The applicant is requesting a Variance to reduce the required
rear yard from twenty (20') to four (4') feet to complete the
development of a two (2) bedroom dwelling with an attached two
(2) car garage at 12435 Harris Avenue in the R-2 (Two Family
Residential) zone, Lynwood, California.
Background:
On October 13, 1993, the applicant filed a Variance request for
the subject property. During the week of November 7, 1993, Staff
requested that the applicant provide the Site Plan Review ..
Committee with a sufficient number of plans in order for the°
Committee to evaluate the application during its December 2, 1993_.
meeting. The plans have not been submitted. On November 24,
1993, Staff sent a letter to the applicant informing him that it
would be recommending to the Commission on December 14, 1993 that
the case be continued to its January 11, 1994 Planning Commission
Meeting (see attached copy of letter).
,
RECOMMENDATION �
�
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration this case be �
continued to the Planning Commission January 11, 1994 meeting. �
i
I
Attachments I
I
1. Location Map I
2. Attached letter
; I
�
I
�
i
�
��
;
�
�
, �
�
f:\staffrpt\var26
� - (
1 '
I
� I
� �
��, � �it o �YNWOOD �
LL.�WM1 CII�
�� �� c�t Ctty vlAeettng C6aQQenges i I I f' i
17330 BULLIS ROAD
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262
• (3t0) 603�0220
November 24, 1993
Mario Saldana Rios
12435 Harris Avenue
Lynwood, CA.
RE: November/December 1993 Site Plan Review Committee Meeting.
Dear Mr. Rios:
Please be advised that your case will not be heard before the
Site Plan Review Committee Meeting on Thursday,,December 2, 1993.
The Committee Meeting is being rescheduled because requested
plans were not received for Committee review.
The next Site Plan Review Committee Meetinq is set for December -
23,1993, provided required plans have been received by Staff no
later then December 9, 1993.
Also, please be advised that Staff will recommend to the Planning
Commission on December 14, 1993 that Conditional Use Permit I
Application Case No. 137 and Variance Request Case No. 26 be �
continued to January 11, 1994.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me
at (310) 603-0220, extension 250. �
�
Sincerely,
Sol Blumenfeld, Director i
Communit De� nt De artment �
i
BY: A t Barfield, anning Associate
Planning Division !
cc: Chron file �
Case files: CUP 137, VAR 26 � �
Robert Diplock �
I
f\plemin9\cup�f:var26.ltr I i
i �
i
. �
. � �
I I
I I
. I i
I �
I
;� ' I
>
,�: �
�
°:r:,
,W
�
I
,+ I
.:
. *� �
' .s:
i:'� �
?' I
;`;< I
t
�___.
_'__
_ ""__ " __. _......_'_.. _. -. '_ �
. . . .. ' """'_
•
LOCATION 6VIAP �
6
S G.
; . ^Jp1N �
. 41 0`\ i �
j , w �
� `"� � �1� `�� P1°f �. . .
� ;� / .
�. 'i r �� `\ ��ti '/e� � t�� �I
� `��.p `` W .,� � '3� .
� �� � '�e, � ����� � i
, � �i Br �o
-� 'a em s� �$'e.`l � dv y� ��R? 5'.° ;'��, � o �,; �
„ r ' �p : . 6% / �O "'14 , „�� �, o,�e i
. i � i � ,�w �,'��3 $ " .� � ' � �O� � � o ° i� �
aa c� �: �� z'i'^ W 3n � es ' l o � 2 ` �
� O o R' � ^ �
� s � Jy -• v � vr ^ � �,�„ I
'�? / ` /ei l SS �� o � ' e ,4 N
' �d 9 � lI , ��� / IC �/�( + . ° n . � h � � 1
� r �� � �R /' / •• '1 s /l � ' / B
�� � Q '` ti `v �/ "� � �OT( �N / � " _ �ziy� `� � `�^�) , s � \ �
\` J �`i I ; � or l � l : � o n.o� • ^ � i7� ,
n r . ` � ' >s.l y R-l7�- T / Z ° � � S . ,� , re
s.' '� � r z � S �� ^ „> a � r a� (o r ��� o : srir �s �
5 �e �jd� b �' i: �k�10 ^^ 9eB9 9 V .i> $�` ,�''� � 1.:.x I 3 � r u''J �i f i
� �to , 0 4.M O� � ' /9 9 : ti �r ti P ,�� � ��4 / � v
e' d � .r - y � � 4 ,.. � ' ^ � � � ° r�
➢; s � �4 q� Ji)I °Lor 1. � ` �.�i ; � �p ��y A J ` e_ o ,
i
> 4� E 0 � ♦. ' y , a.r .� o . I
�� a 9 o ; :a �b 'e 5�[�>� (/� J n Q i.< � � 9 .
0 1j i ,..� � ,n •.� f � �°� v � •r � � 'a'.e.. + J � J i
y b ,',� e��J; �� ;.° ; af ( Z ���x �.y s � b � nf '�a,� � `•ia6��fae ' � '
��- b 4 h , S � c� i
y ri : J QS iJ � � ,2�6�0 ".i� ° i.�o 6>!�� .. : i
. �r > � n •x.�, � � 6 '��� `t
vs4.' " 8 ao � e > > '�� y �Po v 6 ��
� ` -... e.' '`i� a 6s .. '
9 �i��� � g e � � i
"� ��.�y. ,.�: 64 I
� 0 z: o 9 9 ° *o� �:.,� 6j �,� '�
� � e . '�r - �
/
G �� r � g . �i � rro . o. 6 I .. . j
� � t � ' ' :z.2�. 6/ '�
. ry i>� ��� � 'e e // /z 0 ' . .
n� /3 .:>�� � /2 4 S � ` =a0 .. �
p . v Q �� ,. . ` . . , S9 I
/ , . 0 4 = ` ' �.\_ p ii � � � ,. .
. � �ti��, �S1L /!)� \ \� � O .� "V
!i \
�9! f! l!. �.T �if � '� ' � .
� 4 'Hf 6 ,� �! ' 1) . Q '\.SI i
I q
� i "°` � 4r'°�� � Sa.. !
a;^�s 3:. , „ .
, ,°' �.. �o � ss �
' ,� � ��s
N ` t
• ' i
� i
s e% , .,��
i
,
; j
CASE N0. . � �� � 13
;
_.- --.- ______ �
AnF"��,�"�T���i N0.
; DATE: Decembe�4, 1993 ('�r�('� ���, � + ' �� � �
l� i J ��/_� � ,
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director
, Community Development Department ;
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 137
Applicant: Mario Saldana Rios
PYOOOSal•
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit
to complete the development of a two bedroom single family ,
dwelling with an attached two car garage at 12435 Harris Avenue
in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone.
Backaround•
On October 13, 1993, the applicant filed a Conditional Use Pernit�
request for the subject property. During the week of November 7,
i993, Staff requested that the applicant provide the Site Plan°
Review Committee with a sufficient number oE plans in order for;
the Committee to evaluate the application during its December 2,
1993 meeting. The plans have not been submitted. On November
24, 1993, Staff sent a letter to the applicant informing him _
that it would be recommending to the Commission on December 14, :
1993 that the case be continued to_ its January 11, 1994 Planning'_
Commission Meeting (see attached copy of letter). �
RECOMMENDATION ,
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration this case be �
continued to the Planning Commission January il, 1994 meeting. ,'
i
Attachments• I
�
� 1. Location Map
2. Attached letter
I
�
. ` I
�
�
.)
, . �
, i
�
�
1
, • I
' I
�
' �
i
�
� f:�staffrpi\cup137-1 � . ' �
. . � ' . � . - � �
�
. i '
�
_ . ..- : ._ _. __.. -- - � _.
_
_..
* _
LOCATION 6VIAP
6
5G' �
T w
. . �py�Ti� . . ..
.. o � w � �,1� _. �� � ,
' �o'' a �.,,�� ) .
� I ,..
. n . '>,, tio ��, �;�� � � c�. �. .
. . - Mo �h ••/ ' � � �
, � e9 ,, '
�,p �T �°�.$� 9 �i ,p zo �. o
� —� 'a am � - .v ; � � & � FbRr `�' � ; �„ 4 is ,;
, iJ ^ 2 {��- da � y ♦ °'�' 3 "�' _ � �l)N ' � i�i� O. �rz�
� A F /y '� r. � a3 'Y '� �6 ♦ � LQ�I 2 4 � a � �J �
n !� �l ♦� l,S`*yQ BS /
� � 5 \' Q Y /p1 /f � J � � � - 7S o ` / n : �
" '�? i ` � l� ' 9 a � ' a �4 N
. � �.° ��r zl - � � /� sr ° n . . h `� �
i� � ti y n s > � R �N "' `° t �z.9 F : � �. . 3� S� � � �° � .
� Q o o v J � � . � � � � / � ^ +. . �° 5
� r � \ J� I � �CI r .r / T I ♦ o ��a ✓ ^ .t i �M .
♦ e e >
. ` � P �A,p� z 3 � s , � �a =
. . � .r� .^ ` J z c 1?i r b Sr ( s e° � ° �/`° `t3t �s ` .
)e � o' ' = 7° 1 'g 0 _ �s' � .
I= � . s � � ` �:°YVc � � 9gB9 9 � .»� o"' � {;,, 1 '' 8 ''Yd d j � .
� �Ja � a C� � ' /9 � A y ti � ' ^' Q 41 � ssN / v o �
. o` : , 1' - y ie p � . 4 .. { � a s3 ' 1 � „ 'o .
:
� i r o. Qy r � 7 I ^Les �- r '��.�� Y a A .1 , ,.
b � ,� Z � � h �n 6�
, � ' p` ,%; 4 EN F .. . o Q � ��' •+i . 'i�. \ ,�Q o o . �
� � �� 0 0 � 1 _ra ' `^a $ : P �� \ Cn S � > e.e< � � ^� i .: i
. \ 9 a.. C� � ., � ��at Q, q ; Ar d � i
.� '��• / p� //; � ; �R n � a O •� i�2t e ' 4 0 /SJ � � i.
. . Y \ a�� iI C ���yS' �� ��>: +�i. S p b �4i� :ta � � a �i .
� � � tn .s ra � iJ J " ' s �v.i� o ip.�o 6� �� . . . ' i
� � o� A a.�� � � �� E��atl b '
• . � ?4•: ° 8 ryo � 1 � '\\ ya �ll� � '.
' . .Q cp �za3 '"��. ' �
t
9 � � 's` 8 xyy. , �'�� I
�� 0 9
., . / p�xr. r . x e'9 +so� �txoo 63 I
� I
� �•j� � O rc o� 6 1 �. ,. . �. �
, ,,,, . „_ � "°` � . . !,
' . I � '� . :r.!L�. 6/ �,
� � �� �? � // � ' � . . .
. . . •� � , � '> 2 „� . I
v. �
» /j .�v�e � i rri, Q �`1 � _ i
. . 'Y � b Q ��.` P L 'TI>� �� s9 �
4 � a = ` � � �� � .� � . .
. � �e:.�� •sia �� " Q Q4
� '>
� i ♦ '» - � � '+ � � .
ayy � . ���r �`Y � � . �u !
q � � �sr � � . Q' S7
; ,C N , � �, 1,, \:_ I
� „�
� _ � .,e.. �'rsa <7 56 ' �� .. �
�a;�s 3 ; ° „� � : I
� .e ss �
'�
i � ''S i
u � o �
� . � . . � � �. I
I
. �
. i
�
' 1
- �o�� . � � �. I
I
�. �
�
�
�A \, � = I
SE N0, . � �� � �3
,
�
�
� �
�, City o f �YNwooD � :
�U.�Y��K� (Ilv
�� �� cA Ctty vUeeting ChaQQenges i� I I� i
11330 BULLIS ROAD
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262 .
(310) 603�0220
November 24, 1993
Mario Saldana Rios
12435 Harris Avenue
Lynwood, CA.
RE: November/December 1993 Site P1an.Review Committee Meeting.
Dear Mr. Rios:
Please be advised that your case will not be heard before the
Site Plan Review Committee Meeting on Thursday,.December 2, 1993.
The Committee Meeting is being rescheduled because requested
plans were not received for Committee review.
The next Site Plan Review Committee Meetinq is set for December '
23,1993, provided required plana have been received by StaPf no
later then December 9, 1993. -
Also, please be advised that Staff will recommend to the Planning
Commission on December 14, 1993 that Conditional Uae Permit
Application Case No. 137 and Variance Request Case No. 26 be
continued to January 11, 1994.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me I
at (310) 603-0220, extension 250. �
Sincerely, ,'
Sol Blumenfeld, Director !
Communit De� nt De artment i
,
BY: A t Barfield, anning Associate ;
Planning Division ;
cc: Chron file
I
Case files: CUP 137, VAR 26 �
Robert Diplock i
f�plaminy\cup�f:var26.ltr � ��
I
i �
I
, I
i
�
I I
� I
;� . I 'i
;'� !
� ,
;,; ,
W ;
;
. �
,
., ,
� ._��
;.�< �
;.,;
�
. ;;:�r i
t ;,
, •,. , j
°�: I