The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About1992-11-10 PLANNING COMMISSION ; �; LYNWOOD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING, NOVEMBER 10, 1992 The Lynwood City Planning Commission met in a Regular Session in the Council Chamber of Lynwood City Hall, 11330 Bullis Rd. on the above date. Chairperson Dixon presided at the meeting. The flag salute was led by Commissioner McMiller. All present participated. . Commissioners Dove, Muhsin, McMiller, Pryor, Lee, and Dixon answered the roll call. Commissioner Haynes was absent. Also present were Community Development Director Sol Blumenfeld, Wildan Associates Senior Planner Charles Rangel, Planning Associates Art Barfield and Louis Omoruyi, Associate Planner Louis Morales, Assistant•Director of Public Works John Oskoui. Mr. Blumenfeld stated the agenda had been duly posted in - accordance with Tfie Brown Act. It was moved by Commissioner Pryor, seconded by Commissioner Lee • to excuse Commissioner Haynes. ROLL CALL AYES: DOVS� MIISSIN� MCMILLER. PRYOR� LEE� DI%ON NOES: NONE ABSENT: HAYNES = It was moved by Commissioner pove, seconded by Commissioner Muhsin to approve the minutes of September 9, 1992 with no corrections. � Mr. Blumenfeld introduced the first item on the agenda "A Continued Public Hearing, Conditional Use Permit Case No. 114, Louis and Alice Ross applicants." Stated that Commission needed to make a decision on this item. The applicant requested a ' continuancec due to the serious unexpected illness of his attorney. After further discussion, ' Commission agreed to a continuance on C.U.P. 114 until the next meeting on January 12, 1993. When Mr. Ross's attorney is able to attend. . � 1 � It was moved by Commissioner McMiller, seconded by Commissioner Pryor to have the item brought back at the January 12 meeting. ROLL CALL AYEB: DOVB� MIIHSIN� PRYOR, DI%ON NOEB: MCMILLER� LEE ABBENT HAYNEB It was moved by Commissioner Lee seconded by Commissioner Muhsin to set aside the agenda and open public orals to accept testimony on Conditional Use Permit #{114. . PDBLZC ORALS Mr. Ross stated he was going to speak on•his behalf but he was not giving up his right to speak without an Attorney. Stated soil study has been taken care of by Mr. Abelson his attorney. Due to the illness of his attorney he couldn't make a promise as to when his attorney would be available. He also stated how he wanted his project to be completed as soon as possible Robert Henning 3952 Car�in Ave. spoke in opposition to C.U.P. #114. Alberta Bowes 11615 Olive St. Lynwood spoke in opposition to C.U.P. 114. Jerrel Hunter Lynwood resident spoke in opposition to C.U.P.#114. Benny Miranda Lynwood resident spoke in opposition to C.U.P #114. Margaret Benjamin 3539 Louise Ave. spoke in opposition to C.U.P. #114. Enrique Suarez spoke in opposition to staff's comments on block wall fences. Mr. Suarez stated when submitting his plans he was 'never told a block wall fence was necessary. Sol Blumenfeld stated that the code for block wall fences is not explicit, but however it has been commissions policy to establish a block wall fence as a separation wall. Also stated block wall fences have been required since 1985 by Commission. Chairperson Dixon stated that in order to make a decision on this project commission would have to go out and look at the property. Co-owner of this property also stated how there is no code or policy where a block wall fence is necessary. . / , . ' Commission Pryor stated how Commission stated how block wall fences were based on if Commission felt one was necessary. No Action was taken on this item. Chairperson Dixon then introduced the next item C.U.P. #80, Ali Zakeri as the next item on the agenda. Sol Blumenfeld stated this item has been brought back to Commission because of the fact that applicant has not been able to comply by all the conditions for approval. He asks that staff continues this matter back on the meeting of December 8th, until staff can analyze this matter further. After further discussion, ' It was moved by Commissioner Muhsin seconded by Commissioner Lee continuance on C.U.P. #80 until December 8th. ROI.L CALL AYEB: DOVE, MIIHSIN� lICMILLER� PRYOR� LEE� DI%ON NOEB: NONE ASSENT: HAYNES � Chairperson Dixon introduced C.U.P. #121 New Cases. Sol Blumenfeld stated C.U.P. #121 applicant venencio Macias wishes permit to build an Apartment complex at 11304 Louise Ave. Requested Planning Associate Art Barfield to present C.U.P. #121. Planning Associate Art Barfield presented applicant's request as what he intends to develop on property. Also stated that site plan was suitable and up to par for commissions standards. Applicant Venencio Macias introduced Victorio Perales to speak on his behalf because he does not speak or understand English very well. He explained to Commission that Mr. Macias is no longer able to continue with his project due to the fact of the higher cost associated with requirements of the Planning Department. Mr. Perales asked staff if they could delete some of the conditions, such as block wall fence, street pole light, and the tiled roof. If Commissions was unable to delete these conditions he would have to submit �new plans, affordable to him. After further discussion by commission and staff; Mr. Macias asked for a continuance for 60 days until the January 12, 1993 meeting, to submit new plans. t i � i i I 1 � I It was moved by Commissioner Lee seconded by Commissioner Muhsin to continue C.U.P. #121 for 60 days until the next meeting January 12, 1993. ROLL CALL AYEB: DOVE, MIIHSZN� MCMZLLER� PRYOR� LEE� DI%ON NOES: NONE ABSENT; HAYNES Chairperson Dixon introduced C.U.P. q122 applicant Pacific Medical Building Inc. Sol Blumenfeld described C.U.P. #122 to commission as a parking structure and medical building for St. Francis Hospital. Presented Associate Planner Louis Omoruyi to give presentation. Associate Planner Louis Omoruyi gave a brief presentation on C.U.P. #122. Mark Toothacre, representative for Pacific Medical Building gave brief description on plans for new parking structure and the benefits of adding more parking. Commissioner Lee stated how building this parking structure would cause traffic problems on Imperial and around the park. After further.discussion; Assistant Director of Public Works John Oskoui commented that staff had not been able to complete the analysis on C.U.P. #122. Felt that more data for the traffic study was needed because of do to the many traffic signals in this area. More information in a traffic impact study was needed to be done, this report was not completed. After further discussion; Chairperson Dixon asked for a continue on C.U.P. #122 until staff can study it more clearly. Joseph Kunq 3621 Martin Luther King spoke in opposition to C.U.P. #122. Robert Henning spoke in opposition to C.U.P. #122 Owner of Imperial Stockwell building 3618 Imperial Hwy. spoke in opposition to C.U.P. #122: Chairperson Dixon asked for continuance on C.U.P. #122 until next meeting of December lOth. . / . ' It was moved by Commissioner Lee, seconded by Commissioner McMiller to continue C.U.P. #122 until next meeting. ROLL CALL AYEB DOVE� MIIHSIN, MCMILLER; PRYOR� LEE� DIBON NOEB: NONE ABSENT: HAYNEB It was further moved by Commissioner Lee seconded by Commissioner Muhsin to continue Tentative Parcel Map #23648 , Pacific Medical Bldg. at next scheduled meeting. ROLL CALL AYEB: DOVE� MIIHSIN, MCMILLER� PRYOR� LEB DI%ON NOES: NONE ABSENT: HAYNEB Chairperson Dixon introduced C.U.P. 123 Sol Blumenfeld stated C.U.P. #123 applicant Donald Chae, wishes to upgrade his business known as the "Market Place." He then in turn introduced Associate Planner Art Barfield to present presentation. Assistant Planner Art Barfield gave a brief presentation relative for plans of C.U.P. #123, Donald Chae. Also spoke pertaining to Code enforcement requirements and Mr. Chae's compliance. Donald Chae spoke in favor of his C.U.P. and stated his reasons to the Commission why he thought it should be approved and asked commission for their support. Paul Robich, 1541 Wilshire Blvd., architect spoke on behalf of C.U.P.123. Gave a brief presentation on the project. Outlined landscaping, outside parking, and building structure. Robert Heining spoke in favor of C.U.P. #123. Jerrell Hunter spoke in favor of C.U.P. #123. Community Director Sol Blumenfeld pointed out the need for wheel stops, and staff's recommendation for open mesh as opposed to roll down doors. Also discussed land scape relative to trees planters and pots. Donald Chae stated his reasoning for the roll down doors, referring to the recent civil unrest, and necessary security. ' , ', I 1 - i r Commissioner McMiller spoke in favor of wheel stops and roll down doors. Commissioner pove stated his concerns with the wire mesh doors. Commissioner Pryor spoke in favor of the roll down doors. Also questioned the sign ordinance, relative to the landscaping concerns. Chairperson Dixon stated if Mr. Chae was willing to comply by commissions decisions such as wheel stops, tree grading, solid panel doors, then he could go ahead with his plans. It was moved by Commissioner Lee seconded by Commissioner Muhsin to approve C.U.P. #123 applicant Donald Chae. AYES: DOVE, MIIFISIN, MCMILLER, PRYOR. LEE, DIRON NOES• NONE AHSENT• HAYNES Chairperson Dixon introdyced next item T.P.M. #26 applicant Jose Garcia. Mr. Blumenfeld stated that he was no longer in the audience but that he wished to have a continuance until December 8th. Also clarified that applicants names was not Jose Garcia but Oscar Padilla. It was moved by Commissioner Lee, seconded by Commissioner Pryor to continue T.P.M. #26 until next meeting on December 8th. Roll call was done by a show of hands. STAFF COMMENTS � `NONE COMMI88ION ORALS Commissioner lee spoke on the Planning Conference he and some of the staff inembers attended. AWOORNMENT There was no further discussion and it was moved by all commissioner to adjourn at 12:05 to the next regular meeting on December Sth. � �' i � � _ "''rrvD�!� 1TEM N0. � i•� _. � — n ; � DATE: November 10, 1992 �, ��,` ��d� � ' TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director � Community Development Dep tment SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 114 Applicant: Louis Ross PROPOSAL• . ; The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to develop a , five (5) story, 100 unit motel, and a restaurant with a lounge � and banquet facilities located at 11550 Long Beach Blvd., in the C-2A (Medium Commercial) zone. FACTS• 1. On August 11, 1992, the Planning Commission voted to continue CUP No.114 to the November 10, 1992 Planning j Commission meeting to allow the applicant the time to I complete a traffic study, soils study and phasing plan for the development. The City proposed to monitor the traffic � study. 2. On August 31, 1992, Staff sent a letter to the applicant via ; certified mail that stressed the importance of the timing involved in the review of the required studies.(see attached) The applicant did not respond to Staff's letter. 3. On September 24, 1992, the City received a traffic study from the consultant that the City contracted to conduct such ' study. The City reviewed the study and determined that the proposal (CUP 114) would not significantly impact the traffic in this immediate area. ' 4. On October 21, 1992, Staff drafted a letter to be forwarded to the applicant but did not send it because the applicant ' submitted a letter requesting a continuance of the matter due to an illness that was suffered by the applicant's � representative(see attached) The applicant's legal council was coordinating the required soils study. CONCLUSION• Staff has sought to ensure that the application was complete so that the Planning Commission would be able to act on the application. The Planning Commission expressed concern on the applicant's inability to complete and comply with the requirements and �stated at the August 11, 1992 meeting that if applicant was unable to furnish the required studies that the application may be considered incomplete. The applicant is now � requesting that his application be continued to the January 12, 1993 Planning Commission meeting. RECOMMENDATZON: Staff respectfully request that after consideration, the Planning Commission issue a directive as to the continuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 114. f:\plannirg�staffrpt\cup114-7 � � i 4 I . � �it o f �YNWOOD �� °�,° �� Ctty �Ueeting (,'6aQQenges ' I ( ( � ' � 11330 BULLIS ROAD LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262 . � . (370) 603-0220 October 21, 1992 Mr. Louis Ross: P.O. Rox 1092 � Beverly Hills, Ca. 90213 Subject: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT No 114 (CDP 114) Dear Mr. Ross: You are currently scheduled to meet with the Community Development staff to discuss t unit t motelfat�11550P Long1Beach � develop a one-hundred (100) Boulevard. The meeting is scheduled for Thursday, October 29, 1992, in the VIP Room in Bateman Hall at 4:30 pm. At the time of this letter the City had not received from you the required Soils Study for your project. As you are aware the compl,etion of the Soils Study is essential if the Planning Commission is to take action on your application for a Conditional Use Permit (Cup 114) at the November 10, 1992, Planning Commission meeting. Please note that the Planning Commission indicated at the August 11, 1992, Planning Commission meeting, that the inability on your part to produce the Study by the November 10, 1992, meeting may result in the Planning Commission declaring your application incomplete at the November meeting. Ari application declared incomplete is not a denial but would require that the applicant refile such application at the time that the application is considered complete. Staff would like to ensure that your application is complete so that the Planning Commission can act on it at the November 10, 1992 meeting. The City is currently in the process of reviewing the Traffic Study and is awaiting the submission of the Soils report on your part. The City needs both reports before any Environmental clearances can be given to the project. You were given three (3) months by the Planning Commission to complete the Study and the City has not received, nor have we been updated on , the progress in conducting the study. � � � r �� citi � �YNWOOD � � a� rn. �� Ut C�t �ueet�� CtiaQQe�y� , , 11330 BUIUS ROAD ' I I� LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262 (3t0) 603�0220 .: _ �_ _ , _y�..� . _ .��-�, ?_..�'_'J�Z -_:'�--y =:_':ls, C.`-.. 9v�13 -'-'== --- �oss: -'�_ �c =_�e `act t:�:at �.ae have r.ct ^ea•fl from y^1 0� your �-ojec� - _egarcing ��e s��us 1e��er fo on �ugust 29, -��-', ��m providing a second co A_ ___ py c_-tified �.ail. I uncerstand j - ^Y _ spoke wit'. Louis ?!crales on t:�e P1ann_:�g Staff =agardir:g I _-- .._c-ect on August 18,"_992 and Mr. Morales indicated .nat i ••�� essea�ial that the Planning Divisicn receive the - equire� c--i1=,...".:�.;td= Stud_a c - - i _ __ s by th� wee'K o-�uc::st 31, :� order �o - "cCd'_� _=-�__ =e�ort fo= the Flannir.a Cemmis_=:on's cc-siderat'_.�- :-r '_�<� s�_-=�uled hearing in Sepc2moer. 'v�e hav� rot rec=i t^= ___ _-�� e_.:ironm2n�a1 stuuies �nd can-_�t make �°ecomme-�-=icn �_ ---� --_----`-9 �oInn�'_=sioa regarding your �roj ecr . 4y ,-, "._-;= --e�^ t= to exoec=_te c�� _ev_ew of c�,:_ _ y - oroject, :^cweve_ ___--� _ � complete the necessary s�ud_es and r�f_ain fror::c^angir� _--_ =er� again, i� wiil not be possible to como_ete our =e � _-='_-_,' -,anner. Please review �he a�=ached � etter anc '�t Mr�. ====a=es ;cnow if you have an -- y questicns. Thank you - r you= __c�era 'oa. -�-- �_._�er21y, �� fe d, Acting Director --=�L.^._�': Development DepartTent . / I � � f ( Staff has made every effort to minimize delays with your � application. One action that the City took to ensure the completion of your application and to minimize delays was to monitor the required Traffic Study and allow you to contract and produce the Soils Study through the hiring of your own consultant. The City feels that you have allowed too much time to lapse in the completion of the Soils Study which may possibly impede the review time required to review the Study. Please, bring with you to our meeting current site plans and the required Study. If you should have any questions please feel free to contact this office Sincerely, �e�f�1d, Director Community Development cc: Ken Fong, City Attorney's office Louis Morales, Associate Planner Charles Rangel, Planning Advisor Leroy Abelson , � f:cedevelp/letters/ross7 � . , � k � � ' LnW OF!'iCES O� �A�._ _.. o��c��.� O'NEIIL, H�UXTABLE AND ABELSON ��c..o=o i.. *..e�c ' �ECC� .- nBE�50�� BOO wESi iia5i SiAEEi. SuiiE 200 , � � « _ O'rvE�� . . l05 /�NGELES, CALI�ORNIA 9004 � �EIEP�+Or+E i2�31 02��50�� vnn i2iDi ��-.J�S5 . .. . . October 21, 1992 t<s. Elizabeth Dixon ' Cc-nissioner ' ?:anr,ing Commission Czty of Lynwood __�30 Bullis Road _; California 90262 M.r. Sol Blumenfeld Acting Director of Community Development City.of Lynwood 11330 Bullis Road L��nwood, California 90262 Re: Louis Ross Conditional Use Permit Gentlemen: Attorney LeRoy Abelson of our firm, who represents Mr. Ross , .._th reference to the conditional use permit and other matters regarding the City. of Lynwood, underwent open heart surgery on Oc�ober 9, 1992. He was hospitalized for a week prior to the actual surgery. Unfortunately, he has not yet'had an opportunity - c fully review the soils reports issue with Mr. Ross nor will he ce able to appear at the hearing scheduled in November. Mr. :.celson will not be returning to work until after the first of the year. Mr. Abelson is the only attorney in our office familiar u'_th Mr. Ross's case. Therefore, we would request that an extension be granted until :i'_d-January, 1993 in which to comply with the requirements of the : ccnditional use permit and any other action that is necessary. ,teculd you please advise me as to the City's position. Thank you. Cordi � Y, - i / ,� �' "G�� M� , / �,�.� L. O'Neill cc: Mr. Louis Ross v_J:SS _:+.�l:B.�C3 � , ..' . - � ^,'! I�� O, . . I f f ( � DATE: November 10, 1992 v� ��J�- l`io, � TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Directo� Community Development Dep rtment SUB,7ECT: Conditional Use Permit No's. 79 & 80 Applicant: Ali Zakeri BACKGROUND• Pursuant to Planning Commission's directive, Staff is bringing this item back for reconsideration since the applicant has not been able to satisfy the conditions of approval in a timely manner. As a follow up with the recommendations of the Planning Commission Meeting of October 13, 1992 regarding CUP 79 & 80, Planning Staff presents the following: 1. CUP 79 Resolution No. 2381 approved the move-on of a single family dwelling at 3613 Fernwood Avenue on May 14, 1991. According to Building Division records, the move-on was inspected by the Senior Building inspector (Mr. Dave Finney) on July 31, 1991. There were no final inspection by Planning Division , and Public Works Department. The final inspector's outstanding conditions not complied with as to date are Public Works Department conditions Nos. 33, 36, and 40. The property has changed hands from the developer (Mr. Ali Zakeri) to a new owner. 2. CUP 80 Resolution No. 2382 approved the move-on of single story duplex at 3621 Fernwood Avenue on May 14, 1991. As at the last Planning Commission meeting on October 13, 1992, none but one of the conditions for CUP 80 was acted on. Resolution No. 34 requiring a grading plan was completed on September 28, 1992. This was related to the Planning Commission and Mr. Zakeri has not been able to move-on the duplex. The Planning Commission is considering revocation of CUP 80, and need legal counsel advise as to the legal ramification that may proceed the intended decision'. As for CUP 79, Staff's opinion is that Mr. Zakeri and the new owner can work out some deal as to how to completely comply with the Conditions of Approval, such as Condition No. 35 thru 45. Mr. Zakeri has not decided when the move-on will take place. RECOMMENDATION: Staff request that the Planning Commission continue this item to the December 8, 1992 Planning Commission meeting for consideration in order to allow Staff to properly notice the revocation public hearing and further analyze some of the legal issues relative to the Conditional Use Permit. f:\plarming\staffrpt\cup7980-1 � � � , � v ; , AGENDA LYNWOOD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - 7:30 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers _ 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, CA �-'�. � �'' � �- �. ._ ��- -- , ;. ; ,. . ,, � ; , �. , � � -, _: .�_ November 10, 1992 I =_.. _�_ _ ._ � + � . . � . . . ... : �.;�., _ . . . �.. � Elizabeth Dixon � � Chairperson �-�, � (�'�. �l , � ^ � / C� ��,��c� Donald Dove Carlton�Mi�ller �' Vice Chairman Commissioner John Haynes Roy Pryor Commissioner Commissioner Jamal Muhsin Errick Lee Commissioner Commissioner C O M M I S S I O N C O U N S E L• ,' Henry_S. Barbosa Kenneth Fong i City Attorney Deputy City Attorney � i STAFF• I Sol Blumenfeld, Director Louis Omoruyi Community Development Department Planning Associate � Charles Rangel John Oskoui ' Senior Planner, Willdan Associates Assistant Director,� � Public Works Art Barfield Planning Associate ; s:�es��no�io I 1 i I � November 10, 1992 OPENING CEREMONIES A. Call meeting to order. B. Flag salute. C. Roll call of Commissioners. D. Certification of Agenda Posting. E. Approval of minutes for the October 13, 1992 Planning Commission Meetings. CONTINIIED PIIBLZC HEARING: 1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 114 Applicant: Louis and Alice Ross PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop a five (5) story, 100 unit motel, and a restaurant with a lounge and banquet facilities located at 11550 Long Beach Blvd., in the C-2A (Medium Commercial) zone. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff respectfully request that after consideration, the Planning Commission issue a directive as to the disposition ' of Conditional Use Permit No. 114. 2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. SO � Applicant: Ali 2akeri BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Planning Commission's directive, Staff is bringing this item back for reconsideration since the � applicant has not been able to satisfy the conditions of approval in a timely manner. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff request that the Planning Commission continue this item to the December 8, 1992 Planning Commission meeting for consideration in order to allow Staff to properly notice the revocation public hearing and further analyze some of the ' legal issues relative to the Conditional Use Permit. NEW CA8E8• 3.. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 121 Applicant: Venancio Nacias COMMENTS- The applicant 3s requesting a Conditional Use Permit in order to develop a two (2) unit apartment at 11304 Louise Avenue in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone. f : �pl am i rp�agmda�novl0 . 2 .. I - - I , ' RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2452. A. Certifying that project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061b(3). B. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 121, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. 4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 122 Applicant: Pacific Medical Buildings, Inc. COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop a 60,000 square foot medical office building, and a 319 space parking garage to be built on St. Francis Medical Center. Concurrent with CUP NO. 122 St. Francis Medical Center is proposing that the property will be subdivided into three (3) separate parcels to accommodate separate ownership of the medical building and parking structure. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff respectfully request that after consideration, the ' Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2455. A. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit Case No. 122, will not have a significant effect on the environment and certifying the negative declaration as adequate. B. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 122, subject to the ; stated conditions and requirements. 5. TENTATZVE PARCEL MAP NO. 23648 - CASE NO. TPM 25 Applicant: Pacific Medical Buildings COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 23648 for the purpose of subdividing one (1) lot into three (3) parcels, at 3630 E. Imperial Hwy, in the HMD (Hospital, Medical & Dental) zone. The site presently contains St. Francis Medical Center. • RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff respectfully request that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2456. i A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from ! the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by � Section 15061b(3). B. Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 25, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. � f:\Planniny\a9enda\rwv10 � ' 3 I i _ I , .i � 6. MODIFIED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 123 Applicant: Donald Chae COMMENTS• The applicant is requesting a Modified Conditional Use Permit (MOD. CUP 123) to develop shops on the exterior of the existing Market Place of Lynwood at 3100 E. Imperial Hwy, in the CB-1 (COntrolled Business) zone. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2453. A. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit Case No. 123 will not have significant effect on the environment and certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate. B. Approving Conditional Use Per No. 123, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. 7. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 23662 - CASE NO. TPM 26 Applicant: Jose Garcia COMMENTS• The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map i No. 23662 for the purpose of subdividing one (1) lot into two ' (2) parcels at 4605 McMillan Avenue. � RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff respectfully request that after consideration the , Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2454. i A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by � Section 15061b(3). � B. Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 26, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS None STAFF COMMENTS - Review of block wall requirements. COMMENTS: PUBLIC ORALS COMMISSION ORALS ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on December 8, 1992 at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall Council Chambers, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California. f : \Pl ami rp\epmda\nov10 4 i � � 1 j n. �TCI� �1�. �.� , '^ DATE: November 10, 1992 C,,.-1�� N� 1 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director� Community Development Depa ment SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 121 Applicant: Venancio Nacias Pr000sal• The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit in order to develop a two (2) unit apartment at 11304 Louise Avenue in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone. Facts• 1. Source of Authoritv Section 25-4.a. of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to construct multiple dwelling units in the R-3 (Multi-family Residential) zone. 2. Prooertv Location The site is located on the east side of Louise Avenue between Sanborn and Martin Luther King Blvd. (refer to the attached location map). 3., Pronerty Size The subject site consists of a rectangular shaped lot approximately 6,000 square feet in size (40' X 150'). 4. Existinu Land Use The property is currently vacant. The surrounding land uses are as follows: North - Multi-Family Residential South - Multi-Family Residential East - Multi-Family Residential West - Two-Family Residential 5. Land Use Descriotion The General Plan Designation for the subject property is Multi- Residential while the Zoning Classification is R-3. The surrounding land use designations are as follows: General Plan: Zonina: North - Multi-Family Residential North - R-3 I South - Multi-Family Residential South - R-3 East - Multi-Family Residential East - R-3 West - Town House & Cluster Housing West - R-2 1 ' I I � . ,, 6. Proiect Characteristics: The applicant proposes to develop approximately two (2), two , story, 4,061 dwelling units with two (2) car garages for each unit. One unit will contain on its first floor the aforementioned two (2) car garage, a kitchen and nook, a � dining area, bath, and small bedroom. The second floor will consist of two (2) bedrooms, a bath, and family room with a wet bar. The second dwelling will contain on its first floor a two (2) car garage, kitchen, dining, and living area, and a smaTl bedroom and bath. The second floor of this unit will .. contain two (2) bedrooms, a family room, and bath. The proposal call for a minimum of twenty five (25�) per cent of the site area to be landscaped. 7. Site Plan Review At a special meeting on October 29, 1992, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and ' recommended approval to the Planning Commission subject to the conditions and requirements stated in the'attached Resolution. . 8. Zoning Enforcement Historv None of record at the time this report was completed. 9. Public Resoonse None of record at the time this report was prepared. However, it has been reported that the subject site must be . cleaned. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: 1. Consistencv with General Plan The_proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning classification (R-3) and the General Plan designation Multi- _ Family Residential. Therefore, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 121 will not adversely affect the General Plan. 2. Site Suitabilitv The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development relative to structures, parking, walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Compatibilitv The - proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of residential developments; therefore, the project will be compatible with the surrounding land uses. 4. Comnliance with Devel�ment Standards ` .The proposal meets the development standards required by the Zoning Ordinance with respect to setbacks; lot coverage; building height and density. 5. Conditions of Aoproval The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties • or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. �� f:\planning\staffrpt\cup121pc � � 2 + 6. Benefits to Community The proposal will assist in upgrading the residential use of the property and support the intent of the General Plan. 7. Environmental Assessment The Community Development Department Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15061 b(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act of 1989 as amended. RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2452. 1. Certifying that project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061b(3). 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 121, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. Prepare by: Reviewed by: ATTACHMENTS• 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan '3. Resolution No. 2452 f\p�anning�staffrpt\cup121pc 3 W,.�m�. �..._,�., _ �___.,_----- --- - LOC�TIQN MAP , . j �� . � - ,., e ti . ""'' ,.. .wau . °. . {� /7 "' � o . ,::o cv �. n.. . D s�e� - � ` � � ` � 2 '' V �O � o � ; � : i i� �.:, o � 5 � J� � �. � - $ o ' , � F rsi✓c _ 6 — L —�� ::,^ �� ,_ S " /a b — x.v. n T � toa c � i = ° � Q . . o � 6 � v Q � � .�,o iai�ir o r . �` `�, . U � i;:';'. �° E =°asz 6� z�caz--o OCC V � � b � � ir.. t e zoasi —L___�� n�.: 7�1 c --- ', � --------L . . I aoo.�e �_ � . .. ° o ,o,��,..• �;F . .°.� i �i� -..., h g_�s__r 6a zsa�z-- � ° �.. . — � � : � o b pi.. '. V. b _ _ /z — — /30 ..:sl ` �� ^ _ . iN � _ _T� — _ � 0 i�:.-. � . o� ,,,a 75. � ^ 8 ' 'o ' ` u ' __ "' __ __ ._ �-' � . . � . , : . i�' � � is° e 5 �^= '� � n _L 63 7ar..�a . o f g �,,.. i� ,�� °� ii� - � �rsc�� Clr a � � ru `° o ' ,�� I---- o. r � z 61 I� .' � �,�:_. � ',� A to i r� � - r — _li_�---�----- .� — �� _II_ _ � � i�o !f) JS Z Z � .� ^� �"' _ Ic�� ..�,r�� _qC-._„__6/ . �. ��✓ . � ' 7 '"' i � �- — zm, oi _\ / � ` .,�ia �:�9 \_ r JAN004N � � � � � . A✓E. ��.0 . p� g-- . 34 r—,��o> >:.:o--. :� . � a � �' � ,..o. . t t�eoi i".., � I � °• c � so � , so � o0 0 � . � . �o ,�, cf so - 6 p .. < 5 . . ,w, � :H ; � , o ' � 0 L _ = t�' . so .�.t+w::' . ^ v �� i o P o �§1,.. �� . I� \ l. � �� F " e . F „ \ec l�j.ba . , M ` �J \ 1� 11i ! V 1 ��/J/ Z 1� i� � �� '.],< -- J9 p �,, i , e 4..: ! � . � = R p :�� — as f�— �.' /GG B ' . , p V I' _ ___.�_'__ "- V '1'b OI W ,� �.,�. y� w u i�ttt `L�_ irs.u �;;�; �, i � n .,,,, $ -$ ,.,�e $ i ir . N iei�e ifi� .,.,. w - u.�_ — —_ J.56 - n,;: �.. n+ M $— nisu — i T,v.ns�{; 1 i s�� _ � o i„�� f � 1 . ♦ o � , ��e: s� s$ II' . ,... � 2 0.,. I ._ _ _ ' _' ' $ i�lJ1s j_ ....��tt :� � , �� n �.. _.ST ' ��e _'_ ., l i�� QI ; - � , ,� a ��i B .s � v� � '� '.3 - — — ' S� � , . •, � n�...� _ G1.UJ �fJ_JJ t 0 / I 3 J � � ,� ,<, a ti �. Q �u�. � � 11�.�� v I ..�I �/fb ' . '�. �(i..�. 1 il l �t ^ � .__ ___,1�� _ .^— (l1 . �. � I\ V.� __ .� l' ' 1 . , n,,, .�� , o iso ;;; � r�s_m_ � 1 � . $., w i Q � $ ` e d,,. � SS , �,,.� � u. r»i�� . � : 1. � -' — — — — ' - - � � x1 s! �u. � � ' .— - — —!— — — ; — —/1 — ',.oL� �1�� 1 . � -� ��v �^ � � o ^ � � '- � � . .se�. 3d � � � . . . " __ _ : •. e . � • , � � J i ..� . . � �ASE N0. �� ,,� , RESOLUTION NO. 2452 , A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 121 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO, TWO (2) STORY DWELLING UNITS AT 11304 LOUISE AVENUE IN THE R-3 (MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 b(3), as amended; and WFiEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for development in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone. Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Official Zoning Ordinance. B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public, health, safety, or welfare. C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current zoning regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the Site Plan Review Committee. D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. E. The proposed development will add favorably to the housing stock and will provide additional affordable priced housing in concert with the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. F. The proposed development will esthetically upgrade the area and will act as a catalyst in fostering other quality developments. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 121, provided the following conditions are observed and complied with at all times. f\planniry�\resolution\f:reso2452 1 � COMMUNITY DEVELAPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building Code and the Fire Code and be in substantial compliance with plans on file with the Community Development Department. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, for review of said Conditional Use Permit. 3. The applicant shall meet trie requirements of all other City Departments. 4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance of any building perntits. PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS 5. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving the proposed development. 6. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one hundred and twenty (120) days after the use permitted has been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised. 7. Construction shall commence within (6) months from date of issuance of building permits. 8. Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25$) percent of the lot area. 9. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of any building permits. The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs combined with ground cover as follows: One (1) five (5) gallon shrub for each 100 square feet of landscaped area; and two (2) fifteen gallon trees for each 500 square feet of landscaped areas. 10. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped and shall consist predominately of plant materials except for necessary walks, drives and fences. 11. A minimum of two (2) car garages per unit. 12. A six (6') foot high block all shall be installed along the perimeter of the property, except within the twenty (20') foot front yard setback. In this frontage, if built, the wall shall not exceed a height of four (4') feet measured from top of curb. 13. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet. 14. Final building elevations, including materials of construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the Building official and the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. f\planning\resolution\f:reso2452 2 , , 15. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer shall pay $1.65 per square foot for residential builclings to the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government Code Section 53080. 16. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved. 17. Acoustical construction materials shall be used throughout the units to mitigate freeway noise to the standards and satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. 18. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective material •, including shingles, concrete tile, architectural shingles, and other similar roofing material that is not reflective, qlossy, asphalt composite or polished and/or rolled formed type metal roofing. 19. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar material other than the reflective glossy, polished and/or rolled-formed type metal siding. 20. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the ' street dedications. 21. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the exterior elevation of the building must be approved by the Director of Community Development or his/her designee. 22. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in a consistent manner, including the incorporation within the side and rear building elevations of same or all of the design elements used for the primary (front) facades. ' 23. That the applicant submit elevation drawings to the Planning Division showing the exterior building design; including the specification of colors, and materials. 24. AlI security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent building. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc. shall be installed without the prior written approval of the l Director of Community Development. ' 25. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment, swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical devices shall be located within the rear yard or street. Such equipment shall be screened from surrounding properties and streets and so operated that they do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring residents, in accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance. 26. The vacant lot shall be cleaned and maintained in sanitary condition pending construction and shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure to comply may result in revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. 27, A cover sheet of approved conditions must be attached to plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety Division. 28. Entity will maintain a pro-active approach to the elimination of graffiti from the structures, fences and an accessory building, on a daily basis. f:\plerming\resolutn\reso2452 . � � 3 + , � 29. For the purpose of providing heating for any dwelling proposed, only an energy efficient forced air furnace shall be used, and that the use of any wall furnace shall be expressly prohibited. PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 30. Provide documentation that lots composing the property were legally subdivided to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. After reviewing the documents, the Department of Public Works may require the submission and recordation of a parcel map. 31. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered Civil Engineer. Property is located within 100 year flood zone area. Pad elevations shall be 1 foot above flood level zone per flood boundary map. Also conform to all applicable codes per Section 12 1/2 of Lynwood Municipal Code. Building above flood level will require substantial amount of fill, therefore, suggest alternative methods of design to minimize amount of livable space at qround level. 32. Reconstruct curb and gutter and required pavement in frontage of property along Louise Avenue (Cut sheet must be provided prior to the actual work. 33. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk along Louise Avenue. 34. Reconstruct damaged and substandard drive approach(es), per City standards. 35. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected separately. Construct laterals as necessary. 36. Install two (2) 24' box street trees per City of Lynwood standards along Louise Avenue. 37. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass. 38. Provide and install one (1) marbelite street pole with light fixture, underground services and conduits along Louise Avenue. 39. Underground all utilities. 40. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all off-site improvements. 41. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any work. FIRE DEPARTMENT No Comment f:\planning\resolution\reso2452 � 4 � , , ' Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1992 by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAZN: Elizabeth Dixon, Chairperson , APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director Kenneth Fong Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney . I � � f:�plannin9\resolutn\reso2452 t I 5 t i� ``� � a.^�n��:� ITF�� N0. DATE: November 10, 1992 CASE N0 . Z TO: PLANNZNG COMMISSION FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director� Community Development Department BY: Louis Omoruyi, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 122 ' Applicant: Pacific Medical Buildings, Inc. Proposal• The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop a 60,000 square feet medical office building, and a 319 space parkinq garage to be built on St. Francis Medical Center. St. Francis Medical Center property will be subdivided into three (3) separate parcels to accommodate separate ownership of the medical building and parking structure. Facts• 1. Source of Authoritv Section 25-32.1.5 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that all new commercial development in the City of Lynwood obtain approval of a Conditional Use Permit from the Planning Commission. 2. Prooertv Location The property is located in the Hospital, Medical, Dental (HMD) zone on the south'side of E. Imperial Highway, between � Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Stockwell Road, Birch Street, � Imperial Hwy., and Beechwood Avenue. The site presently , houses St. Francis Medical Center (medical facilities, parking structures and power plant and associated structures). See attached location map. , 3. Prooerty Size The subject property is an irregular shaped lot ; approximately 12.64 ± acres. 4. Existina Land Use The subject site is flat, containing St. Francis Medical � Center and parking garage structures. The surrounding uses are as follows: ' i North - Commercial ' South - Public Park East - Hospital, Medical, West - Commercial Parking Garage Structures 5•� Land Use Descriotion i General Plan• Zonina• � North - Commercial North - Public Facility ' South - Public Park South - C-3 (Heavy Comm.) East - Hospital, Medical, East -(HMD) Hospital, Dental Medical, Dental West - Commercial West - C-3 (Heavy Comm.) f:\Plannirg\staffrpt\cup122pc , � 1 I � 6. Proiect Characteristics: The western portion of the site consists of two (2) asphalt parking lots and the hospital. The eastern portion contains the recently constructed medical tower and associated parking garage structure. St. Francis Medical Center is utilized as a 550 bed hospital and medical facility. The site is accessible from several entrances along Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Beechwood Ave., Birch St., and Imperial Highway. The proponent (Pacific Medical Buildings, Inc.) is proposing to construct a four (4) story medical office building and a four (4) story parking garage structure on the western portion of the site of St. Francis Medical Center. The site presently contains seven (7) large four (4) story buildings linked together by hallways and walkways. The proposed medical office building will consist of a four (4) story building 88 ft x 172 ft with 15,000 square feet leasable space on each (4) story. The medical office building is proposed as a private development separate from the non-profit St. Francis Medical Center. However, the proposal will compliment St. Francis Medical Center via availability of leasable medical office space for future expansion of the center. The proponent has also applied for subdivision of the site to accommodate separate ownership for the medical office building and the parking garage structure. Additionally the applicant also proposes a four (4) story parking structure to accommodate 319 parking spaces for the use of the proposed medical office building with 60,000 square feet leasable space. � 7. Site Plan Review At its regular meeting on October 29, 1992, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and recommended approval to the Planning Commission, subject to � specific conditions and requirements. , 8. ZoninQ Enforcement Historv � None of Record. � 9. Public Response I Staff has received comment from the owner of property located at 3600 Zmperial Awy. indicting the proposed development will create a hardship and result in a loss of tenants in adjacent buildings and that the project should be delayed until there is higher occupancy and greater area , demand for medical office space. In addition, one property owner located at 3623 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. has inquired about the staging of parking and the net loss and gain of the parking area on the medical campus. ' f:\plarning�staffrpt\cup122pc 2 ' i __ I , ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: 1. Consistencv with General Plan The proposed land use is consistent with the existing Zoning Classification (HMD) and General Plan designation of Hospital, Medical, Dental. Therefore, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 122 will be in conformance with and not adversely affect the General Plan. 2. Site Suitabilitv The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development relative to structures, parking, walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Comoatibility The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of commercial and hospital, medical and dental uses; therefore, the project will be compatible with the surrounding land uses. Public park to the south; to the north, south and west of the proposed use are commercial uses; and to the east is hospital, medical and dental uses. 4. Comoliance with Develooment Standards The proposal meets the development standards required by the Zoning Ordinance with respect to setbacks; lot coverage; building height and density. 5. Conditions of Anproval The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have � a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, � safety or welfare. 6. Benefits to Communitv Despite the potential draw from existinq tenants of adjacent medical offices to the proposed development, Staff finds that the proposal will assist in upgrading the Hospital, Medical, Dental uses of the property and support the purpose and intent of the General Plan. ' 7. Environmental Assessment � I Staff has found that no substantial environmental impacts , will result from the proposed development; therefore, a I Negative Declaration has been filed in the Community � Development Department and in the office of the City Clerk. ' RECOMMENDATION: � Staff respectfully request that after consideration, the Planning � Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2455. , 1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit Case No. 122, will not have a significant effect on the environment and certifying the negative declaration as adequate. � 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 122, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. i f:\planning�steffrpt\cup122pc � i� 3 � � ATTACHMENTS• 1. Location Map 2. Resolution No. 2455 3. Site Plan f:\planning\staffrpt\cup122pc � � i � i i I f r � � 4 � i _ I � LOCA1'ION MAP , .�`��. �:R MaP7DN ' AV� '' n uai \ .P b ii i P Y C? A yA �NO. / S y / I, 1�e°�.�- �6 1 .S ` . , 6 �� g `�S � � �p ' ' D\,' ✓'� � c � y/. � � F �; \ , � � /' +oJ t 4 ',` � �i �� ,,. ..e JeJ frr /`✓ lJ z'S � 1e? IZ d 4 Y 'P t'� � .<�V,IRD �0 �J y �( / .c� b TA Q . M �' 4 � i ,,� ., i ^ a 'S �iS � �_ ' �`,� ,ve f i� �9 �� .. b� � �' 6I � I / w • 9 i itf i � '6�� '� !i �\ . � � .o�� d p 4,. v� � 5 ��L �f'��t� 't �o \ . ' t ` 6P u ' s tP . - '� / I I � � �o� ,,e°� I �AP � � u �• o ", iP so ; �s� ^ � i � , c " . ,7 ' � �.. � ��e �e �7 . p � � �W i . � I •6 "� � V � .. '. M/ NWAY \ �P � Y �l� � ' I i�' � , « w �e.� y � u , ' I b 6 `� � N � R�F SACF 4 I '/5! � l3J { / I o ��A +��:.. �ro � � ' 'a �� i. niy�cf � T.T'.�'r» � � � � � � � I x :, 3 W ,.�, y $�e � ° � �.0 is} � � ,� � z x� W � ; i �, R ^� ,,;, _ m 5 i � i Ri , � , ' u nq p� ., � ii AVENUE ' ��. � � „ r__ y, -.. �• I � ' A � I a� � ``qM/NC A P � � i • h\ ,i �� . mn / � nl `� ' / �� r f l.l�\� qi �� I I / �`\ qe y /'y � � I I I �\ / �Gq� �/ I ,i ��_�N /f ��i kI " I � I ' u 4 iroti... 7 � � -1 �� , t '�� . � M / i IC 3 I T I }e n � � � ' _ I C �N wooD ` � i:;.; � ,-:::. CITy s.. I � i i . N � � � , . � � i CASE N0. C ' __ _ __ __. __. u� i22 � ____ _ __ _�_ _ _.__ , � RESOLUTION NO. 2455 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 122 FOR THE DEVEIAPMENT OF A 60,000 SQUARE FOOT MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING AND A 319 PARKING SPACE GARAGE STRUCTURE IN THE HMD (HOSPITAL, MEDICAL, AND DENTAL) ZONE. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal will not have a negative effect on the environment, and has therefore declared a Negative Declaration for the project; and WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for development of a new commercial use in the area designated as I � Commercial under the General Plan and in a HMD (Hospital, Medical ! and Dental) zone. I Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and I determines as follows: I A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and � shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, ' landscaping, driveways and other development features as ; sequired by the Official Zoning Ordinance. j B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, will � not have a neqative effect on the values of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public, i health, safety, or welfare. i C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current ' zoning regulations and site plan submitted and reviewed by the Site plan Review Committee. D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will be in 'i conformance with and not adversely affect the General � i Plan. i E. The proposed development will aid in anesthetically upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in ; fostering other quality commercial developments in the i surrounding area. � Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, I based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby + approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 122, provided the � following conditions are observed and complied with at all times. � f : \pl anni ng�resol utn\reso2455 � 1 I COMMiJNITY DEVEIAPMENT DEPARTMENT GENERAL 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, for review. 3. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance of any building permits. REDEVELOPMENT DIVISION 4. The project design shall provide for access and circulation of vehicular, pedestrian, and emergency vehicle traffic in a safe, logical and efficient manner, both to the site (off- site) and within the site (on-site). 5. The development shall be of a quality and character which enhances and harmonizes with existing developments located in the surrounding area. 6. The proposed design shall be compatible with existing developments in the area in terms of scale, height, bulk, materials, colors. 7. The main entrance to the primary building shall provide for ' independent access to the physically impaired in accordance ! with Title 24. 8. The street address shall be displayed in a prominent ; location on the street side of the building. All address numbers shall be easily visible to vehicular and/or pedestrian traffic. The street address and room numbers shall be no less than six (6) inches in height and no less � than 3/4 inch stroke width and shall be of a color contrasting to the background to which they are attached, � subject to review and approval of Fire Department. 9. On-site lighting shall be installed along all vehicular access ways and major walkways. Such lighting shall be � directed onto the driveways and walkways within the development and away from adjacent properties. � 10. The parking aisle width shall be twenty-five (25') feet. Exits from parking lot shall be clearly posted with stop signs. 11. No sign shall be erected without a sign permit. , 12. The Director or his designee shall issue the sign permit � upon approval by the Planning and Redevelopment Divisions. 13. Only individual illuminated channel letters shall be permitted. 14. Billboards signs are prohibited. ' 15. There shall be a periodic review of the applicant's compliance with all of the requirements, at a time specified by the Director, but in no event longer than 12 months. � f: \planning\resolutn\reso2455 ' 2 . 16. The applicant or his/her successor in interest shall provide evidence of good-faith compliance with all of the requirements at the time of said review. 17. If, at the end of the time period established by the Director or his/her designee, the applicant or his/her successor in interest has failed to comply with all of the requirements, the Director or his/her designee, shall notify the Planning Commission of his/her findings and recommend such action as deemed appropriate, according to the Lynwood Municipal Code. PLANNING DIVISION 18. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood ' main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving the proposed development. 19. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one hundred and twenty (120) days after the Conditional Use � Permit has been abandoned or has ceased to be actively ; exercised. � ' 20. Construction shall commence within six (6) months from date � of issuance of building permits. � Landscaoina 21. The applicant is required to submit a landscape plan drawn by a licensed architect subject to the review and approval , of the Director of Community Development prior to any building permit being issued, i 22. All landscaped areas shall be landscaped with a mixture of ground cover, shrubs and trees, and may inclnde decorative � rock, sculpture, and walkways, within the major parking � area, subject to review and approval of the Community Development Department. 23. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance i with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs i combined with ground cover as follows: one (1) five (5) � gallon shrub for each 100 sguare feet of landscaped area; and two (2) fifteen gallon trees for each 500 square feet of � landscaped areas. 24. The amount of landscaping required shall be provided and consistent with the proposed landscape plan. 25. All other existing mature trees and other significant � vegetation should be preserved and integrated into the landscape plan to the satisfaction of the Community � Development Director or his/her designee. ' 26. All landscaping shall be permanently maintained. Lawn and ground covers are to be trimmed or mowed regularly, with all planted areas kept free of weeds and debris. All plantings ; are to be kept in a healthy and growing condition. An � automatic irrigation system shall be provided and maintained , in working condition f:\planning\resolutn\reso2455 3 I \ 27. Where vehicles are to be parked immediately adjacent to a public or private street or alley, a decorative masonry wall a maximum of thirty-six inches in height measured from the finished surface of the parking area, shrub and ground cover lot from street view shall be provided. If a wall is provided, there must be minimum landscaping to screen wall from street view and accessibility. 28. Prior to the installation or construction of any fence or masonry wall within any zone, the property owner shall obtain a permit and submit the following information to the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. a. A simple plot plan showing the location of fence or masonry wall in relation to the property lines, heights, proposed materials, and openings or gates to provide access for vehicles and pedestrians. b. For masonry walls a building permit shall be applied for upon approval of the plot plan described above. All , masonry walls of any height shall meet the requirements ; for masonry construction as defined in Chapter 24 of the Uniform Building Code. A fee based on the valuation of , the proposed construction shall be paid to the Building Division. 29. All fences or masonry walls shall be required to maintain ! adequate pedestrian access for the purpose of safety and convenience. A thirty-six (36) inch or three foot clear � gate or opening shall be provided to all enclosures for pedestrian and wheelchair access in accordance with Title � 24. Pedestrian and vehicular access shall be provided. , 30. All fences or masonry walls shall be required to be � installed with a finished, anesthetically pleasing side facing out toward adjacent properties or the public right-of-way to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director or his/her designee. 31. The applicant must provide trash enclosures consistent with the materials and color of the main building(s), with gates, on the site of the subject property. The trash enclosure ' shall be built as per Building and Safety Division ' standards. Parkina 32. Parking structure shall be a minimum of 319 stalls for � customer parking only. 33. Each off-street parking space shall not be less than twenty i (20) feet in length and nine (9) feet in_width, exclusive of access driveways or aisles, except as noted below: ; a. Any standard parking space that is immediately adjacent to a wall, structural column, light standards, or I similar obstruction on one or both of its longer sides or in an enclosed space shall be at least ten (10') feet � in width and twenty (20') feet in length. � b. At a minimum, two parking spaces designed for the handicapped shall be provided. These spaces may be provided as follows: i f:�p l ann i ng�reso l utn\resd455 �. 4 ' ; I � . 1. Dimensions: The minimum dimensions of each automobile parking stall for the handicapped shall be not less than fourteen (14) feet in width by , twenty (20) feet in length. Said stalls shall be lined to provide a nine (9) foot parking area and a five (5) foot loading and unloading area or; 2. Two (2) spaces may be provided within a twenty-three (23) foot wide area, lined to provide a nine (9) foot parking area on each side of a five (5) foot loading and unloading area. The minimum length of each parking space-shall be twenty (20) feet. 3. Location: All parking spaces for the handicapped shall be located adjacent to the main entrance of the facility for which the spaces are provided. The parking spaces shall be positioned so that the handicapped persons shall not be required to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles and shall be posted with appropriate handicap signage. 34. The parking lot plan for the subject site shall have a I circular-flow arrangement without dead-end aisles when possible. � 34a. Applicant shall provide temporary parking in a gate manner during the.construction of the proposed medical building and i parking structure. The temporary parking plan shall be review and approved by the Community Development Department prior to construction. 35. The applicant shall submit elevation drawings to the Planning Division showing the exterior building design; , including the specification of colors, and materials. Prior � to the issuance of building permits, the design of the � subject building including color and materials, must obtain � approval by the Director of Community Development. I 36. Prior to the installation, display, enlarging, modifying, ' relocating or changing of signs, a permit must be obtained , from the Department of Community Development, Planning Division. 37. Central Heating, cooling ventilation equipment, pumps and heaters and any such mechanical devices shall be screened from public view. Such equipment shall be screened from j surrounding properties and streets and operated so that they i do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring residents, in accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance. All means of access to the referenced equipment shall be � . designed and installed so as to prevent access to , unauthorized persons and shall be approved by the Building ' and Safety Division. 38. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent � buildings. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc. ; shall be installed without the prior written approval of the ' Director of Community Development and required building � permits as per plan. 39. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 1319 to ensure variation and esthetically pleasing color schemes for buildings in � � Redevelopment areas along major City Streets, i.e. Long Beach Blvd., Atlantic Ave., Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., or � Imperial Highway, the exterior of any building or structure � shall be painted with a color within a range of colors approved by the Community Development Director. f:\planning\resolutn�reso2455 I 5 I � � 40. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in a sanitary condition pending construction and shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure to comply may result in revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. 41. Applicant will maintain a pro-active approach to the elimination of graffiti from the structures, fences and any accessory building, on a daily basis. Maintenance of sidewalk, parking area, gutters and any surrounding area will be done a minimum of twice a day (before starting operations and before closing). 42. A coyer sheet with approved Conditions must be attached to plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety Division. 43. Any violation of said conditions in this resolution may result in revocation or modification of the Conditional use Permit by the issuing body at a regularly scheduled meeting. PUBLIC WORKS I 44. Submission and recordation of a parcel map is required. I 45. Dedicate a five (5) wide strip or property along Birch j Avenue to provide ten (10) foot width sidewalk. i 46. Dedicate five (5) foot wide strip of property along Cesar Chavez Lane to prove five (5) foot width sidewalk. 47. Submit a grading plan.prepared and signed by a registered i Civil Engineer. Property is located within 100 year flood zone area. Pad elevations shall be one (1) foot above flood level zone per flood boundary map. Also conform to all I applicable codes per Section 12 1/2 of Lynwood Municipal � Code. Building above flood level will require substantial � amount of fill, therefore, suggest alternative methods of I design to minimize amount of livable space at ground level. 48. Construct ten (10) foot wide sidewalk along Birch Street � between Becchwood Avenue and Zmperial Highway. ; 49. Remove existing Oleanders and construct new five (5) foot + sidewalk, curb and gutter and repave half width street on � south side of property line along Cesar Chavez Lane. i (Between Birch Street to east side of St. Francis Power I Plant.) � 50. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk along Imperial Highway and � Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. i 51. Reconstruct damaged curb and gutter and required pavement � along property frontage on Imperial Highway, Martin Luther ' King Jr. Blvd. and Birch Street. � 52. Reconstruct damaged and substandard drive approach(es), per I City standards on Birch Avenue, Imperial Highway and Martin , Luther King Jr. Blvd. 53. Reconstruct damaged and substandard wheelchair ramp(2) along i Imperial Highway, Birch Street and construct two (2) � wheelchair ramps at Northwest and Southwest corners of � Beechwood Avenue and Birch Street. � � 54. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected ( separately. Construct laterals as riecessary. f:�planning�resolutn\2455 � I � 6 ' i I , , 55. Install twenty five (25) 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood standards along Birch Street, Imperial Highway and. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. 56. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass. 57. Provide and install eight (8) marbelite street pole with _ light fixture, underground services and conduits along Cesar - Chavez Lane and Birch Street. 58. Underground all utilities. 59. Underground existing utilities if any modifications are ' proposed for the electrical service panel. 60. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all off-site improvements. 61. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The , work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any work. 62. No parking at anytime along Imperial Highway and Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd: 63. Remove and replace (5' x 5') damaged steel plate on sidewalk , located on east side of Birch Street north of Beechwood Avenue. 64. Install beeping devices for sight-impaired persons at all ' 4-legs of intersection of Imperial Highway and Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. and 3-legs intersection of Imperial Highway and Los Flores Avenue. Section 3. A copy of Resolution No. 2455 shall be delivered _ to the applicant. APPROVED AND this day of 1992, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Elizabeth Dixon Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director Kenneth Fong Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney . � f:\planning\resolutn\reso2455 � • - : 7 ,. � ��ii�UH ! I tlVl IVU. '9 �� DATE: November 10, 1992 CASE N0. � -.�� -I `" TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director,� Community Development Department SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 23648 - CASE NO. TPM 25 Applicant: Pacific Medical Buildings PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 23648 for the purpose of subdividing one (1) lot into three (3) parcels, at 3630 E. Imperial Hwy. in the HMD (Hospital, Medical & Dental) zone. The site presently contains St. Francis Medical Center. FACTS 1. Source of Authoritv Section 25-18, et seq., Subdivision Regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act, Government Code Section 66410, et 'seq require that a parcel map be recorded for the subdivision of parcels. 2. Property Location. The property is located on the south side of E. Imperial Hwy. between Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Stockwell Road, Birch Street, E. Imperial Hwy., and Beechwood Avenue. The site presently houses St. Francis Medical Center (Medical Facilities, parking structures and power plant). See attached location map. ; 3. Existina ' The parcel currently contains St. Francis Medical Center and � parking structures. The uses surrounding the parcel consist � of the following: � i i North - Public Park South - Commercial , East - Hospital, Medical & Dental West - Commercial 4. Propertv Size The subject property is an irregular shaped lot with 12.64 ± �� acres. � 5. Lanci Use Desianation The General Plan designation for the property is Hospital, Medical & Dental and the Zoning Classification is HMD. The surrounding land use designations are as follows: General Plan Zoning North - Commercial North - C-3 (Heavy Comm.) South - Open Space South - Public Park ! East - Hospital, Medical East - HMD & Dental � West - Commercial West - C-3 (Heavy Comm.) . f:\planning�staffrpt\tpm25pc , � 1 � I � I . yi 6. Proiect Characteristics The applicant proposes to subdivide one (1) lot into three (3) parcels to allow for separate ownership of the proposed development. The proposed subdivision shall provide for a 60,000 square foot medical office building on one (1) parcel; four (4) story parking garage structure on one (1) parcel, and the remainder of the lot consists of hospital buildings/medical office and parking structures. 7. Site Plan Review At its regular meeting on October 29, 1992, the Site Plan Review Committee recommended approval to the Planning Commission subject to conditions and requirements. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION Environmental Assessment. The Community Development Department has determined that the project could not have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a Notice of Exemption has been prepared and is on file in the Community Development Department and the office of the City Clerk. • Staff analysis of this proposed subdivision include the following findings: (a) Design of the proposed site; and (b) Consistency of the proposed site with the General Plan. Confiauration Of The Pronosed Site Subdivision a. The design of the proposed lot subdivision shows the proposed lots to provide adequate egress and ingress and shall not cause a disruptive internal circulation with existing Hospital, Medical & Dental developments within i the existing center. b. The proposal is meant for the subdivision of one (1) lot � into three (3) parcels in order to allow better utilization of the property and separate ownership. ; c. The site is physically suitable for the proposed use, � the development is permitted by the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance in that the parcels are substantially flat and able to support the intensity and type of development proposed. Consistencv Of The Site With The General Plan i a. Staff's inspection shows the site to be compatible with - the City of Lynwood's General Plan as the General Plan � limits land use activities to those projects that � enhance the function and quality of developments without ' altering significantly the character of the existing environment. b. The size and location of the proposed project does not � significantly change the character of the existing environment. f:\plarming\staffrpt�[pm25pc ' 2 � �` c. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Zoning Classification of minimum lot sizes in the HMD zone and the General Plan designation of Hospital, Medical, Dental. RECOMMENDATION(S): Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2456. 1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3). 2. Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 25, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. Prepared By: Reviewed By: Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Resolution No. 2456 3. Tentative Parcel Map No. 23648 , i i I f:\plennirg�staffrpt\tpm25pc � i � 3 � _ I � i __ __."' ___'__._'_'_'___ i ' S Wd.1. "ON ; Z � , ; � . � ,I N • �I . �- , � ; �li� � � � O �� M N � � , I �"� e � ' �,�,,.M� � � ..,� r� ,,; - qi tl /�� IfI�\ � �� • � M ' \ � � \ I ii �q 5 �i��, ++� � �`_ . ' • d p a.v ir✓r�, � � � •� h � ( �� '� `� + I n ' / I ' ^ i O �0 � � . I `a � �Sd� rsi,� _� I a / �nr . N4taCw 7�� `� 2 b ! ddU1! NOI.l.d�0� - _ � . ; RESOLUTION NO. 2456 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 23648 TO SUBDIVIDE ONE (1) LOT INTO THREE (3) PARCEIS. BEING A PORTION OF , LOTS 171-175, INCLUSIVE, AS SHOWN ON LICENSED SURVEYOR'S MAP IN BOOK 16, PAGE 37 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF IAS ANGELES. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended; and wHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered all pertinent testimony offered in the case as presented at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the preparation, filing and recordation of Parcel Map is required for development; and Section 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that said Tentative Parcel Map No. 23648 in the ' H-M-D (HOSpital, Medical, Dental) zone, should be approved for the,following reasons: A. The subdivision meets all the applicable requirements I and conditions imposed by the State Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the Lynwood ' Municipal Code. i B. The proposed subdivision of lots is consistent with the applicable elements of the General Plan and the Official Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lynwood. C. Proper and reasonable provisions have been made for adequate ingress and egress to the subdivision of the ' lot. D. Proper and adequate provisions have been made for all j public utilities and public services, including sewers. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of ' Lynwood hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 23648 in the H-M-D (Hospital, Medical, Dental) zone, subject to the following ' conditions. COMMUNITY DEVEIAPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS , 1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. 2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he has read, understands, and agrees to the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, before any building permits are issued. f:�plenning\resolutn\reso2456 , 1 ' f ,, � � PLANNING DIVISION 3. Within twenty-four (24) months after approval or conditional approval of Tentative Parcel Map, the subdivider shall file with the City of Lynwood, a Final Map in substantial conditionally approved, and in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Lynwood. 4. No grading permit or building permit shall be issued prior to recordation of final map or another appropriate instrument approved by the City of Lynwood, a Final Map as approved or conditionally approved, and in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Lynwood. 5. Extension of the Tentative Map approval shall only be considered if the applicant or his/her representative, submits a written request for extension to the Community Development Department stating the reasons for the request, at least thirty (30) days before map approval is due to expire, pursuant to, and in compliance with, Section 25-18, of the subdivision regulations of the City of Lynwood. 6. The Final Parcel Map shall be filed with the City Engineer of the City of Lynwood. 7. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in sanitary condition upon approval of the Tentative Parcel Map and pending construction of the proposed addition, I and shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner at ' all times. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING + 8. All conditions of the State Map Act and the City's I subdivision Ordinance must be met prior to recordation. � All matters and improvements shall be consistent with the ordinances, standards, and procedures of the City's ' Development Standards, Engineering Procedures and ; Standards, Water Standards, and Planting Standards of the Department of Parks and Recreation. ' The Developer is responsible for checking with staff for clarification of these requirements. ' 9. Submit a Subdivision Guarantee to this office. ! The final map shall be based on a field survey. All � surveying for the proposed development will be done by the Developer, including the establishment of centerline ties. Enclose with the final map the surveyor's closure sheets. ' 10. Develooer shall oav all aoolicable develonment fees i includina drainaae, sewer water and narkwav trees Drior to issuance of anv buildings oermits � Pav Parcel Mao checkina fees prior to checkin� Pav 5100 monument checkina fee nrior to recordation Deposit S50 with Citv Enaineer to auarantee receint bv City of recorded. reDroducible mylar oarcel maD prior to recordation. � , f:\pl arxi i ng�reso l utn� reso2456 ' � 2 i , All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees are to be paid prior to�recording the final map. All requirements to the serving utilities to be met or guarantee prior to recording of the final map. 11. Grading and Drainin4 A grading plan signed by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted for the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer and the Director of Community development. The grading plan shall include the topography of all contiguous properties and streets and shall provide for the methods of drainage in accordance with all applicable City standards. Retaining walls and other protective measures may be required. Offsite drainage easements may be necessary. The structural section of all parking areas shall be designed by a Civil Engineer based upon soils analysis supplied by a recognized and approved soils engineering firm. The structural section shall be approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. In the event that the design is not provided, the minimum structural section that will be approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer would be 2 inches of asphalt on 4 inches on untreated rock base. 12. Sewers The development shall be provided with public sewers. Connect to public sewer. Provide laterals as necessary. Design of all sanitary sewers shall be approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. � 13. Water Svstems The Developer shall construct a water system including water services, fire hydrants and appurtenances through the development as required by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. The Developer shall submit a water system plan to the City of Lynwood Fire Department for fire � hydrant locations. The City will install water meters only. Payment for said meters shall be made to the City prior to issuance of building permits. The Developer shall install on-site water facilities including stubs for water meters and fire hydrants on interior and on boundary arterial streets. , All conditions of the Lynwood Fire Department must be met prior to recordation. � 14. Public Easements and Riqht-of-Wav Where drainage, sewer and other such easements are � required, the minimum easement width shall be ten (10) feet to facilitate maintenance unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 15. Sidewalks Design, configuration and locations shall be subject to the � approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, and the Director of Community Development. Ramps for physically handicapped persons shall be provided both on- site and off-side as required by State and local regulations. � � f:\planning�resolutn\reso2456 . 3 i I � i 16. Dust Control and Pedestrian Safetv. Prior to the issuance of demolition or grading permits, the developer shall: a. Submit a plan indicating safety methods to be provided to maintain safe pedestrian ways around all areas of construction. This may require proper and adequate signs, fences, barricades, or other approved control devices as required by the of the Director of Community Development. 17. The Developer shall install all public improvements, as required by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer prior to issuance of anv occunancv tiermits for this development. All changes and repairs in existing curbs, gutters, and sidewalks and other public improvements shall be paid for by the developer. If improvements are to guaranteed, a faithful performance bond shall be posted by the developer to guarantee installation of said public improvements and an agreement for completion of improvements with the City Council shall be entered into. Submit Policy of Insurance or bond protecting City against damage or injury to persons or pioperty growing out of, related to, or resulting from ' improvements or work. The Director of Public Works/City Engineer will determine amount and form. Deposit with the Director of Public Works/City Engineer before commencing � any improvements, a sum estimated by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to cover cost of inspection of all improvements under his jurisdiction. ' 18. Dedicate a five (5') feet strip of property along Birch ', Avenue to provide ten (10') foot width sidewalk. 19. Dedicate five (5') wide strip of property along Cesar Chavez Lane to provide five (5') foot width sidewalk. I 20. Construct ten (10') foot wide sidewalk along Birch Street between Beechwood Avenue and Imperial Highway. 21. Construct new five (5') foot sidewalk, curb and gutter, and repave half width street on south side of property line ' along Cesar Chavez Lane. (Between Birch Street to east side of St. Francis power plant.) 22. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk along imperial Highway and Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. 23. Reconstruct damaged curb and gutter and required pavement along property frontage on Imperial Highway, Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. and Birch Street. 24. Reconstruct damaged and substandard drive approaches, per City standard on Birch Avenue, Imperial Highway, and Martin . Luther King Jr. Blvd. ; 25. Reconstruct damaged and substandard wheelchair ramps along � Imperial Highway, Birch Street and construct two (2) wheelchair ramps at northwest and southwest corners of Beechwood Avenue and Birch Street. 26. Install twenty five (25) 24" box trees per City of Lynwood � Standards along Birch Street, Imperial Highway and Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. ; f:�planning�resolutn�reso2456 ' 4 � �� .� 27. Provide and install eight (8) marbelite street poles with light fixtures, underground services and conduits along Cesar Chavez Lane and Birch Street. 28. Underground all utilities. 29. No parking at anytime along Imperial Highway and Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. 30. Remove and replace (5' x 5') damaged steel plate on' � sidewalk located on east side of Birch Street north of Beechwood Avenue. 31. Install beeping devices for sigh impaired persons at all 4-legs of intersection of Imperial Highway and Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. and at all legs of intersection of Imperial Aighway and Los Flores. Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1992, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: r NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Elizabeth Dixon, ; Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director Kenneth Fong Community Development Department City Attorney f:\planning\resolutn\reso2456 5 I �, � ��i,��A ��_�J� i'��. � DATE: November 10, 1992 - [ TO: PLANNING COMMISSION C�SL N�. � � FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director� Community Development Department SUBJECT: Modified Conditional Use Permit Case No. 123 Applicant: Donald Chae - PROPOSAL• The applicant is requesting a Modified Conditional Use Permit (MOD.CUP 123) to develop shops fronting on a pedestrian walk located adjacent the existing Market Place of Lynwood at 3100 E. Imperial Hwy. in the CB-1 (Controlled Business) zone. FACTS• 1. Source of Authoritv Section 25-25 11 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to modify, expand, or made other changes in an approved conditional use permit. 2. Prooerty Location and Size The subject property consists of a single lot on the south side of Imperial Hwy. at State Street. The subject property is irregular in shape having a site area of 479,160 square feet or approximately eleven (11) acres in size. 3. Existina Land Use There is an 82,368 square foot multi-tenant retail building with a 2,520 square foot loading dock and a 17,798 square foot pubic service building on the northeast end of the site. The surrounding land uses are as follows: North - Public/Multi-Family East - Retail/Commercial � Residential South - Retail/Commercial West - Industrial 4. Land Use Descriotion The General Plan designation for the subject property is Commercial and the zoning classification is,CB-1 (Controlled Businessj zone. .The surrounding land uses are as follows: General Plan: Zoning: North - Commercial North - C-3 South - Commercial South - CB-1 ' East - Commercial East - CB-1 ! West - Industrial West - M f:\planning\staffrpt�mod723 � � 1 � I � .� 5. Project Charaoteristics: The applicant proposes a 5,500 square foot first floor retail addition to the exterior of the existing multi-tenant retail shopping mall. The addition includes three (3) 320 square foot shops, two (2) 235 square foot shops, one (1) . 205 square foot shop, one (i) 200 square foot shop and one (1) 160 square foot shop. The proposed design calls for the ' addition to be added to the north side (entry side) of the . existing development. The design also calls for a pedestrian type sidewalk lined with trees and sitting benches. Nineteen (19) new parking spaces are proposed to accommodate the new addition. 6. Site Plan Review At its regular meeting on October 29; 1992, the Site Plan Review Committee approved the proposed project, subject to the conditions in the attached Resolution. 7. Zonina Enforcement History , The Code Enforcement Division has documented an extensive record regarding code violations at the subject site. This ' has led to a set of conditions imposed by the Code Enforcement Division. These conditions address posting of business licences on file with the City, maintaining free and open walkways, installation of trash compactor, proper maintenance of all site areas, maintenance of parking lot, prohibition of car sales on parking lot, and immediate clean , up after special events. 8. Public Response None of record at the time the staff report was completed. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: " 1. Consistencv with General Plan The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning classification of CB-1 (Controlled Commercial) and General ' Plan designation of Commercial. Therefore, granting ' Conditional Use Permit No. 123 will not adversely affect!the • Lynwood General Plan. 2. Site Suitabilitv The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate , the proposed development Yelative to structures, parking, walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. Imperial Highway is a major arterial and is well suited to , carry the quantity of traffic the proposed development would generate. 3. Comoatibilitv ° The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of commercial developments; therefore, the project will be compatible with the surrounding land uses. However, legal non-conforming residential uses are adjacent and west of the proposed use. f:\planning�staffrpt\mod123 2 s 4. Compliance with Develonment Standards The proposal meets the development standards required by the Zoning Ordinance with respect to setbacks; lot coverage; building height and density. 5. Landscaoe The proposed outdoor vendor areas encourages potential consumers to gather in areas between the exterior of the market place and the proposed parking as indicated by the "paseo" design. In order to facilitate a relaxing atmosphere for the public, Staff is recommending that a tree be installed in front of each of the 19 parking spaces. A species of trees should be selected so that the canopy extends above the signage as depicted on the elevation (see page 1 of the site plan). Additionally, Staff is requiring a three (3) feet wide extended curb in order to allow pedestrian traffic move easily between the parked vehicles and the paseo walkway. 6. Incomplete Existina Conditions of Avproval Staff notes that a number of conditions required by Public Works Department on the original Conditional Use Permit such as untrimmed trees, damaged walkways, damaged curb and gutter, handicap access, and other related improvements were never completed. These conditions have been included again. Also, utility bills of approximately $10,000 have been outstanding for several months. Staff request that if the utility bills are not paid for by the time of the public hearing that the Planning Commission continue this item. 7. Conditions of Annroval The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have. a negative effect on the values of the properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. 8. Benefits to Communitv The proposal will assist in upgrading the commercial use of the property and support the Commercial designation of the General Plan. 9. Environmental Assessment Staff has found that no substantial environmental impact will result from the proposed development; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been filed in the Community Development Department and in the office of the City Clerk. f:\plarming\steffrpt\mod123 � 3 I RECOMMENDATION• Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2453: 1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit Case No. 123 will not have significant effect on the environment and certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate. 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 123, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Resolution No. 2453 3. Site Plan f:\plarming\staffrpt\mod123 ; i 4 :� i • ` � �. a � •� ' i � �. ,,� �w�w�� w�w�� . ��: � �_��p p � { � R � ] .. �.. � � �C^Y�fd ;�,�, . p �� , .� �.. �� ;�,�, �� . � �- ��9��9��..:.■��I : -_ �11��,��,�►�. Q�� 0� �,� :. � �:�= . � � � � � .�a��'��►�� ,. � �� ,.� . �.��1a��a�� .� �. � . . ... •� . �° � , .. . � : p: 5 yr�l� r: �. ��r,., �� ; . .. ��5�� :o��r�'��i��ii��`i��:��t� � �' , � •�� RD�.I'�e��'�r�e�� ,��/, ��, , , � I [�1 �� r 1 [{� . �� r ` ..�w : � � ,� F j �� + �`��`� � ,� I � �� r��i'�W�� s � , r�.ser��c��,�� .., .. ., �� " r • 1� •RT- • �' �Q � , �+�, �.� � ��' � ., �.L,'�y��1�:1�I� � �� `7+�,�� `��,��, � �b� ; ��A�,� ° 1. � �' r�'� 't' ¢� �rI �t.. �t , � � •• • . i " � , % �'�� a �'��'�� '� Y � �, � r ��i3�� '�'�� ,� � ' ��j�� . ��I�� .; � � ��rl �=� ��►i �=�fT, �� O � , �► �.:� �.�wr�. � . p� �� < , . w '�` `''F�r � t �AI �l�tA � 1 �� ,�� %�� ' � ��:�� ` �� ; ; �� '� � ' �� • � ., �� - ., ,�, ��:f • � I (�, y � .� y� • . , � �� I� . �� ` .� � '�.. :� ,� �.�.�,,r,�.:.:, ; ; ,�� 1� __ , o�- -. _ � + �� • �e.. � � �, �� . �l�.��►. . , _ �� .,,: , L. �r u RESOLUTION NO. 2453 I A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSZON OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVZNG MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 31, RESOLUTION NO. 2308, FOR THE OPERATION OF A MULTI-TENANT RETAIL SHOPPING MALL AT 3100 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY IN THE CB-1 (CONTROLLED BUSINESS) ZONE, ' LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, 90262 WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal will not have a negative effect on the environ- ment, and has therefore declared a Negative Declaration for the project; and WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for development of a Multi-Tenant Retail outlet in a CB-1 (Controlled Business) zone. Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and deter- mines as follows: ; A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Official Zoning Ordinance. B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values of' surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public, health, safety, or welfare. C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current ' zoning regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the Site Plan Review Committee. D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. E. The proposed development will aid in esthetically upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in fostering other quality Commercial developments. Section 2: The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 31, provided the following conditions are observed and complied with at all times. f:\planning\resolutn�reso2453 1 I I I � 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable regulations of the Lynwood Municipal,Code, the Uniform Building code and the Fire code. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon or increase number of vendor/vendor space or reduction in square feet of any booth size, shall first be reported to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, for review of said Conditional Use Permit. 3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. 4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance of any building permits. REDEVELOPMENT DIVISION 5. Uses shall be in accordance with the map on file in the Community Development Department except as approved by the Director of Community Development. O Show wheel stoos on olans to eliminate car overhana onto sidewalk area. O Redesicrn retail shoo doors as roll down mesh securitv doors, or similar nroduct. O Insure that pr000sed colors for retail addition are consistent with existinq buildina colors and its facade. 6. Seven (7�) percent of the gross lot area shall be landscaped. o Provide one (1) tree per parking space in the new side walk area. o Provide tree grate for each tree well in the proposed side walk area. o Znsure that each tree is twenty four (24") inch box. Specify tree species. BUZLDING DEPARTMENT 7. All plans required to be submitted for approval will meet the requirements of the 1985 edition of the Uniform Building Code, Plumbing, and Mechanical Code, as well as the 1987 Edition on the National Electric Code if submitted before December 31, 1989. If submitted after December 31, 1989, plans must meet the Building, Plumbing, and Mechanical Codes with California Amendments. 8. All plans for this building for tenant spaces, remodeling and use, shall be done in conformance with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 7(Appendix), Division 1, for Covered Mall Buildings, 1985 Edition (before Dec. 31, 1989). 9. Restroom facilities must conform to Uniform Building, and Plumbing codes, as well as Health Department regulations due to the expansion of use for Multiple Tenant Usage. f:�p t anni ng\reso L utn\reso2453 �� 2 � , PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING • 10. Conditions required by the Planning Commission per Resolution No. 2308 were not completed. Therefore, all of the conditions under Resolution No. 2308 will be applied for . this CUP NO. 123. FIRE DIVISION 11. Extend buildina fire sprinkler system to orotect additional - buildincx area (retail additionl. CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 12. Management will be resnonsible of maintainina a copy of each tenant's Citv business licence. ManaQement will ensure that tenants will not be open for business UNLESS a copy of the Citv Business License is on file. 13. Manaaement will conduct dailv inspection of all hallways and walkways to ensure tenants do not encroach the walkways with disnlay of inerchandise, sian, etc. 14. Trash Compactor system must be installed in order to orevent the present constant overflowina conditions. 15. Maintenance of sidewalk, oarkina area, gutters and all surroundina area will be done at least once a dav before starting of operations bv a commercial comvanv. Conv of the contract will be maintained in the Manaqement's office. at the site, at all times. 16. Mana4ement will be responsible for cleanun of the parkina lot and surroundina areas (such as immediatelv surroundina streets and auttersl after anv special event. For anv special events extra trash bins will be olaced at each oarking lot and mall exits. 17. Parkinct lot area will be used for the sole intended purpose as established under the code. o Abatement of violations of any conditions of this conditional use permit or the Municipal Code shall be within five (51 days from the date of citation or formal notice to the owner. o Upon continued violation of any condition of this conditional use bermit or the Municinal Code, the conditional use oermit shall be susoended automatically and result in the revocation of the conditional use nermit. f:\planning\resolutn\reso2453 3 , �� Section 3. A copy of Resolution No. 2453 shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this lOth day of November , 1992, by meinbers of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: � NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Elizabeth Dixon, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director Ken T. Fong Coaununity Development Deputy City Attorney Department f:\plarming\resolutn\resd453 . 4 4 f •� DATE: November 10, 1992 ACENDA iTEM N0 . � �^ TO: PLANNING COMMISSION C�qS� �j�. FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director,� Community Development Depar ent SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 23662- CASE NO. TPM 26 Applicant: Jose Garcia PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 23662 for the purpose of subdividing one (1) lot into two (2) parcels at 4605 McMillan Avenue.� FACTS 1. Source of Authoritv ' Section 25-18, et seq., Subdivision Regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act, Government Code Section 66410, et seq require that a parcel map be recorded for the subdivision of parcels. 2. Property Location. The property is located between McMillan Avenue at the south and Arlington Avenue at the north and is approximately 12,152.52 (49.52' x 243.44') square feet in size., (See attached location map) 3. Existina The parcel currently contains two (2) existing dwelling units with garages (one facing McMillan Avenue and the other facing Arlington Avenue). The uses surrounding the parcel consist of the following: ' North - Single Family Residential South - Single Family Residential East - Single Family Residential West - Single Family Residential 4. Land Use Desianation The General Plan designation for the property is Single Family Residential and the Zoning Classification is R-1, The surrounding land use designations are as follows: General Plan Zoning North - Single Family Residential R-1 South - Single Family Residential R-1 East - Single Family Residential R-1 West - Single Family Residential R-1 i f:\ptanning�staffrpt\tpm26 � 1 i i. i � Proiect Characteristics The applicant proposes to subdivide one (1) lot into two (2) parcels to allow for separate lots for each dwelling unit on the subject site. The proposed subdivision shall result in two (2) lots approximately 6,076.26 square foot in size; one, fronting McMillan Avenue, and the other fronting Arlington Avenue. 6. Site Plan Review At its regular meeting on October 29, 1992, the Site Plan Review Committee recommended approval to the Planning Commission subject to conditions and requirements. Staff notes that the width of the lots shall be only 49.52 feet wide which is actually below the 50 feet minimum width allowed by the Lynwood Municipal Code. However, since this is only a few inches below the minimum allowed, Staff did not require the applicant to file concurrently with a variance. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION Environmental Assessment. The Community Development Department has determined that the project could not have a significant effect on the. environment. Therefore, a Notice of Exemption has been prepared and is on file in the Community Development Department and the office of the City Clerk. Staff analysis of this proposed subdivision include5the following findings: (a) Design of the proposed site; and (b) Consistency of the proposed site with the General Plan. Configuration Of The Proposed Site Subdivision a. The design of the proposed subdivision shows the proposed lots to be in character with existing single family residential developments in the area. b. The proposal is intended for the subdivision of one (1) lot into two (2) parcels in order to allow better utilization of the property and separate ownership of the two (2) single family structures that exist on the property. c. The site is physically suitable for the proposed use, the development is permitted by the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance in that the parcels are substantially flat and able to support the type of development proposed since the existing driveway provides access to each residential dwelling. Consistencv Of The Site With The General Plan a. Staff's inspection shows the site to be compatible with the City of Lynwood's General Plan as the General Plan limits land use activities to those projects that enhance the function and quality of developments without altering significantly the character of the existing environment. f:\planning\staffrpt\tpm26 - � 2 I � � b. The size and location of the proposed project does not significantly change the character of the existing environment. c. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Zoning Classification of minimum lot sizes in the R-1 zone and the General Plan designation of Single Family Residential. RECOMMENDATION(S): - Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2454. 1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3). 2. Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 26, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. Prepared By: Reviewed By: Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Resolution No. 2454 3. Tentative Parcel Map No. 23662 f:\planning\staffrpt\tpm26 3 I -.. . _ -. � _ _- ! _ .. , I � ' . e -. � ��r ' � 13 ,. �., _- '� _ '� 1; � � � � �`�a , i-3ic� =l�Srth ; - T �, �-� i ` „ � _ "' - � . L°'- � 1 1' p S '-e��F� � • r liF ` L � ! . _ -_,�: v : � ��t�� i �\ �i �' �o[h 1 n� l �%�C�S '1� //L�r 'c - ' V ,� � i(1�� S�il� "_..._""'^ u J � � i' � � '. t �C �ti � -�- Q �� O: .4 �}'-_._ (.,;�7y, i___SOCI� h t � �'=.. i . i �� '�-"'�Ic �T. ^h `_ :ti a � : YC �__ - C ^ �. a '�� y , ` �PRh ', l �?�'� ytn,5' : �J �'. .--�, .r- . sr �` ,. SL� ` -'[frr__� �t��,• ' � .:�s � � , ; `i- �.I* OT1hy_� I � .. VMi �i°f� _.� ` __ n nf ` bi�h M, � .,:r� � ,Z ,oh ,,,� � � .a��,-G -, x _FT�s �i�� 6 , ��„ '.� �'� w � 0�9�. �.. i�r � i r o�h 1 i �inhl 1 • 8 k� y T, o �'�= -�t � ��' o�h � o . ' . ' �"/T °' " -- - �ro%H � > � � z .° 4 � �-rlo9¢� F°�h t .. yssh_ S � e r� �� A ir �+' /s �i- ` ) o O '� d�'n i - ✓il�C iu� Ab9 fi-nnr-- � , V . . �5��' (]� Y O/.SA �� /. ;��,G'� ;- �' Y ' ��',• r,.u��: ._ '>-t--^hSl. ' . --" �l.�h ` J � �� .i x� : 6 [ ' F Cf. 11 ... __ d,El/r '�� n u. // L � \ `c?'. � ----� �� ";i�T ��eS�`i / _ s � :'f-i � ' � °F i� 'i;t� z :C£f,;; >> ..i, ! � � � ��s Z � !'=� o p c.t_` Q ___,. :- '-�P9ti . � c: q�� = 4 clr�• O C s, e • � K�,' 1� e9P .«:.--" � � 4 - ii� � _.rfr �,;� (, _.'L �_( �T 9 �� ,^.�a C�� _ D . tPSh_�_'__ 'Z-�a�si .if ;A" c � c .'� � � O Z 'h , S `' ` `11�-?h_' ��I/S�_ _ ' � . � .� ..p/' l- � � Q � � � J � ^� ,� _ e, .] .,,� � -- J n,^ I �° "� ` ; �: ^ :�� W � . : + - �'; . � � , , ,.,,, _ .• ...,, � � , , _ � �IlNb'�ld � ..,. .. ,.,. 1. � � � � .�. � , i ., � .. Q . , `, ' �., : � � ,- -- `` � ` tA u u � �tl � "` s[ _ -�� ^ � 1 R � ----�--- ---- s �'- Z — r_ . � � � . � .. � . ,�:r382 , .. - ., , RESOLUTION NO. 2454 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMZSSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVZNG TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 23662 TO SUBDIVIDE ONE (1) LOT INTO TWO (2) PARCELS AT 4605 McMZLLAN AVENUE, PORTION OF LOT 39 TRACT 7099 IN THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF IAS ANGELES AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 101 PAGE 6 AND 7 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered all pertinent testimony offered in the case as presented at the public hearing; and WAEREAS, the preparation, filing and recordation of Parcel Map is required for development; and Section 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that said Tentative Parcel Map No. 23662 in the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) zone, should be approved for the following reasons: • A. The subdivision meets all the applicable requirements and conditions imposed by the State Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code. B. The proposed subdivision of lots is consistent with the applicable elements of the General Plan and the Official Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lynwood. C. Proper and reasonable provisions have been made for adequate ingress and egress to the subdivision of the lot. D. Proper and adequate provisions have been made for all public utilities and public services, including sewers. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 22800 in the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) zone, subject to the following conditions. COMMUNITY DEVEIAPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. f:\plarming\resolutn\resd454 - 1 � 2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he has read, understands, and agrees to the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, before any building permits are issued. PLANNING DIVISION 3. Within twenty-four (24) months after approval or conditional approval of Tentative Parcel Map, the subdivider shall file with the City of Lynwood, a Final Map in substantial conformance with the Tentative Parcel Map as approved or conditionally approved, and in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Lynwood. 4. No grading permit or building permit shall be issued prior to recordation of final map or another appropriate instrument approved by the City of Lynwood, a Final Map in substantial conformance with the Tentative Parcel Map as approved or conditionally approved, and in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Lynwood. 5. Extension of the Tentative Map approval shall only be considered the applicant or his/her representative, submits a written request for extension to the Community Development Department stating the reasons for the request, at least thirty (30) days before map approval is due to expire, pursuant to, and in compliance with, Section 25-18, of the subdivision regulations of the City of Lynwood. 6. The Final Parcel Map shall be filed with the City Engineer of the City of Lynwood. 7. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in sanitary condition upon approval of the Tentative parcel map and shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING 8. All conditions of the State Map Act and the City's subdivision ordinance must be met prior to recordation. All matters and improvements shall be consistent with the ordinances, standards, and procedures of the City's Development Standards, Engineering Procedures and Standards, water Standards, and Planting Standards of the Department,of Parks and Recreation. The Developer is responsible for checking with City staff for clarification of these requirements. f:\pl armi ng\reso L utn\reso2454 2 9. Submit a Subdivision Guarantee to this office. The final map shall be based on a field survey. All surveying for the proposed development will be done by the Developer, including the establishment of centerline ties. Enclose with the final map the surveyor's closure sheets. l0. Developer shall pav all applicable development fees includina drainaqe, sewer, water and oarkway trees orior to issuance of any building oermits. Pav Parcel Mao checkinq fees orior to checkina. Pay S100 monument checkina fee prior to recordation. Deposit S50 with Citv Enaineer to guarantee receiot bv City of recorded, reoroducible mylar, parcel map orior to recordation. All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees are to be paid prior to recording the final map. All requirements to the serving utilities shall be met or guaranteed prior to recording of the final map. 11. Gradinq and Draining A grading plan signed by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted for the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer and the Director of Community Development. The grading plan shall include the topography' of all contiguous properties and streets and shall provide for the methods of drainage in accordance with all applicable City standards. Retaining walls and other protective measures may be required and offsite drainage easements may be necessary. The structural section of all parking areas shall be designed by a Civil Engineer based upon soils analysis supplied by a recognized and approved soils engineering firm. The structural section shall be approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. In the event that the design is not provided, the minimum structural section that will be approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer would be 2 inches of asphalt on 4 inches on untreated rock base. Submit to this office a Geologic/Soils Report signed by a Registered Soils Engineer. 12. Sewers The development shall be provided'with public sewers. Connect to public sewer. Provide laterals as necessary. Design of all sanitary sewers shall be approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 13. Water Svstems The Developer shall construct a water system including water services, fire hydrants and appurtenances through the development as required by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. The Developer shall submit a water system plan to the City of Lynwood Fire Department for fire hydrant locations. The City will install water meters only. Payment for said meters shall be made to the City prior to issuance of building permits. The Developer shall install on-site water facilities including stubs for water meters and fire hydrants on interior and on boundary arterial streets. All conditions of the Lynwood Fire Department must be met prior to recordation. f:\ptanninp\resolutn\reso2454 3 , 14. Public Easements and Riaht-of-Wav Where drainage, sewer and other such easements are required, the minimum easement width shall be ten (10) feet to facilitate maintenance unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 15. Sidewalks Design, configuration and locations shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, and the Director of Community Development. Ramps for physically handicapped persons shall be provided both on-site and off- side as required by state and local regulations. 16. Dust Control and Pedestrian Safetv. Prior to the issuance of demolition or grading permits, the developer shall: Submit a plan indicating safety methods to be provided to maintain safe pedestrian ways around all areas of construction. This may require proper and adequate signs, fences, barricades, or other approved control devices as required by the Director of Community Development. 17. The Developer shall install all public improvements, as required by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer orior to issuance of any occupancy permits for this development. Public Improvements shall include but are not limited: - Reconstruct damaged PCC sidewalk along property frontage on Arlington.Avenue. - Construct new PCC sidewalk in parkway along property frontage on McMillan Avenue. - Reconstruct damaged curb and gutter and required pavement along McMillan Avenue. - Reconstruct damaged curb and gutter and required pavement along Arlington Avenue. - Planting two (2) parkway trees and tree wells, one (1) on Arlington avenue and one (1) on McMillan Avenue. All changes and repairs in existing curbs, gutters, and sidewalks and other public improvements shall be paid for by the developer. If improvements are to be guaranteed, a faithful performance bond shall be posted by the developer to guarantee installation of said public improvements and an agreement for completion of improvements with the City Council shall be entered into. Submit Policy of Insurance or bond protecting City against damage or injury to persons or property growing out of, related to, or resulting from improvements or work. The Director of Public Works/ City Engineer will determine amount and form. Deposit with the _ Director of Public Works/City Engineer before commencing any improvements, a sum estimated by the Director of Public Works/City Sngineer to cover cost of inspection of all improvements under his jurisdiction. f:\plarmiry\resolutn\reso2454 4 , ; Section 3: A copy of Resolution No. 2454 and the conditions shall be delive�red to the applicant. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of November 1992, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: • Elizabeth Dixon,Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sol Blumenfeld, Director Kenneth Fong Community Development Department City Attorney f:\pl anni ng\reso l utn\resd454 . 5