HomeMy Public PortalAbout1992-08-11 PLANNING COMMISSION �_�'�
;,
� � �'.�-�c.�
AGENDA I R E E I V E D
� CI7Y OF LYNWOOU I
C�TY CLERriS Gr'FICE ,
� AUG - � 1992
LYNWOOD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION qM PM
7i8i9il0illi12i1i2�3
REGULAR MEETING - 7:30 p.m. �
� �4��:�� ��
City Hall Council Chambers
, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood,.CA '��,
,
, August 11, 1992
Elizabeth Dixon
Chairperson
Donald Dove � Carlton McMiller
Vice Chairman Commissioner
John Haynes Roy Pryor
Commissioner Commissioner
Jamal Mushin Errick Lee
Commissioner Commissioner
. C O M M I S S I'O N C O U N S E L:
Henry S. Barbosa Kenneth Fong
City Attorney Deputy City Attorney
STAFF•
Sol Blumenfeld, Acting Director Louis Omoruyi
Community Development Department Planning Associate
Charles Rangel John Oskoui
Senior Planner, Wildan Associates Assistant Director,
Public Works
Art Barfield
Planning Associate
f:agenda:eugll
1
. E,
4
August ll, 1992
<.
OPENING CEREMONIES
. A. Call meeting to order.
B. Flag salute.
C. Roll call of Commissioners.
D. Certification of Agenda Posting.
E. Approval of minutes for the May 12, June 9, and July 14, 1992
Planning Commission Meetings.
CONTINIIED PIIBLZC HEARING:
1. DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT REVISION & EIR ADDENDUM
COMMENTS
Pursuant to City Council direction, Staff is proposing a
revision to the Housing Element of the City of Lynwood
General Plan in order to bring the Housing Element into
conformance with State requirements mandated under Sections
65583 (a), (b) and (c) of the Government Code. The Draft
Housing Element Revision addresses city-wide housing goals,
objectives and programs. An initial hearing on the Draft
Housing Element Revision is proposed with a 30 day period for
circulation of the Draft document and EIR Addendum in order
to obtain public comment. Following the circulation period,
the Draft Housing Element Revision and EIR Addendum is now
being presented for a final hearing to City Planning
Commission and City Council. This item was continued from
July 14, 1992 Planninq Commission meeting.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: i
After due consideration, staff respectfully request the ,
Planning Commission:
i
i
1) That the Planning Commission shall consider the EIR
addendum with the final EIR prior to taking action on the
Draft Housing Element Revision. �
i
2) Recommendation to the City Council to certify the EIR i
Addendum.
3.) That the City Council adopt the Revised Housing Element i
as described in the Draft Housing Element document. �
2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 120 �
Applicant: Abraham Ponce �
The applicant is requesting approval for a Conditional Use �
Permit (CUP 120) in order to develop a seven (7) unit �
apartment and remodel 3 existinq structures into apartments �
at 10977-83 Wright Road, in the R-3 (Multi-Family
Residential) zone.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
This item was continued from the July 14, 1992 meeting �
because guest parking and the applicant has still not �
corrected the site plan. Therefore, staff request that after
due consideration the Planning Commission continue
Conditional Use Permit Case No. 120 in order for the �
applicant to revise the site plan to meet parking , i
requirements.
t:agerde:euotl �
I
2 I
I
I
REGUI�R ORDER OF BUSINESS
None
STAFF COMMENTS ,
- Update on expedition of CUP No. 114
- Preliminary report on roof materials for inclusion of
building standards.
- Greenline Transit Station Area Plan.
- Commission participation at Lynwood Community Transit
Center Grand Opening August 29th 9:30 - 1:30
COMMENTS
PUBLIC ORALS
COMMISSION ORAIS
ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission
on September 8, 19922 at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall
Council Chatnber, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California.
;
t:agerda:augll ' ,
�
'
I
I
3
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
_ PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY, MAY 12, 1992
OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Call to Order
The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City
of Lynwood was called to order by Chairperson Haynes on the
above captioned date at 7:30 p.m., in the Chambers of
Lynwood City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California
90262.
B. Pledae of Allegiance
The flag salute was led by Commissioner Lee, all present
participated.
C. Ro12 Call of Comatissioners
Vice Chairperson Muhsin requested the roll call, and Mr.
Blumenfeld complied.
Present: Commissioner ponald A. Dove
Commissioner Errick Lee
Commissioner Elizabeth Dixon arrived late.
Commissioner Carlton McMiller
Commissioner Jamal Mushin
Absent: Chairperson John Haynes
Commissioner Richard Pryor
A15o
Present: Kenneth Fong, Deputy City Attorney I�
Sol Blumenfeld, Development Services Manager i
Art Barfield, Planning Associate
Louis Omoruyi, Planning Associate
Louis Morales, Planning Associate
Ted Semaan, Civil Engineering Associate I
Sol Blumenfeld, Development Services Manager stated that he �
was called by Commissioner Pryor, who indicated that he was �
is unable to attend due to family matters. Commissioner
Dixon indicated she might be delayed. Chairperson FIaynes
will not be able to attend due to illness. �
MOTION by Commissioner Lee, SECONDED by Commissioner Muhsin, I
to grant excused absences to Commissioner Haynes, i
Commissioner Pryor and Commissioner Dixon. MOTION passed by i
unanimous vote. �
F. Certification of Agenda Postina I
i
Mr. Blumenfeld stated the a enda was �
g posted per the Brown
Act.
G. Aooroval of Minutes �
, Approval of the minutes of April 14 Planning Commission I
minutes. Mr. Blumenfeld asked that approval of the March �
meeting also be approved. Commissioner Lee requested that
the minutes of April 14 page 3, 3rd paragraph, Mrs.
Valentine comments acknowledging Mr. Fehderson's arrival or
presence be stricken from the minutes due to the fact he is
no longer a staff inember. Unless he is at the podium making
a comment to the commissioner or staff inember.
F:�Planning\Min\Mayct � '�
�
�
I
i
Commissioner Dixon arrived.
Commissioner Lee directed comments to staff.
MOTION by Commissioner pove, SECONDED by Commissioner Lee,
to accept Minutes of March 10, and April 14, 1992, as
corrected.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioner pove, Lee, Muhsin, Dixon, McMiller
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Haynes, Pryor,
�BSTAIN: None
Commissioner Lee asked to move the public hearing item no. 2
case no. 110 to be the first item on the agenda and continue
to the next item on the calendar.
MOTION car`ried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Muhsin, Lee, McMiller, Dixon
NOES: None
�. ABSENT: Commissioner Haynes, Pryor
ABSTAIN: None
CONTINUED PUBLIC AEARING:
1. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 110
3831 Martin Luther King Boulevard (James Oh)
� Applicant requests approval to transfer existing off-sale
alcoho2ic beverages permit from existing market to a new
67,726 square foot market at 3831 Martin Luther King
Boulevard in the C-2 (Light Commercial) zone.
Mr. Hlumenfeld introduced Mr. Barfield, who made the
presentation and said with due consideration staff
recommended approval.
Vice Chairperson Muhsin open the public orals, j
Mr. Harold Tucker 3846 Le Sage spoke in favor of the new '
market. Mr. Tucker wanted to state that Frontier Market was �
Superior Warehouse, he wanted the named clearified. Mr. i
Tucker asked if it were true that Frontier wants to build a �
three story building. !
Commissioner Dixon said the plans were there to clarify that �
question. �
Mr. Tucker stated that he knew that Frontier Warehouse had a
liquor license when the store first open after awhile he
noticed that liquor was no longer being sold. Mr. Tucker �
asked why they were no longer selling liquor. one of the men �
working at the market told Mr. Tucker that the store stop �
selling liquor because people were stealing half pint �
bottles. � � � � �
i
.' I
� F:\Plannirg\Min\Neyct �
, '
Z �
' I
Mr. Tucker addressed the issues of the market havinq a fowl
odor and that the garage bins are in the open. Mr. Tucker
said this was not true. Mr. Tucker has lived in the
community for 18 years and stands behind Mr. Oh's request
because he is helping the community, the market has training
positions and graffattii programs for members of the
community.
Ex-mayor Robert Henning introduced himself and acknowledged
Mayor Louis J. Heine as being in the audience. Mr. Henning
stated that he is in favor of Frontier'Market and that it is
time that we embrace some our korean merchants in the
community and start helping them to upgrade our community.
He indicated that Mr. Oh hires community residents to keep
the cost of his business down. Mr. Henning recommended that
maybe this should be brought to the attention of also the
City Council, for future reference of the Alpha Beta site.
The alcohol ordinance was establish to prevent other liquor
selling establishments not to come into the City. He
suggested we move ahead for the record.
Larry Wiggs, 72 Sanchez Drive, Los Angeles stated that he
was familiar with La Fiesta Market located at 103rd and
Avalon, Los Angeles and that Mr. Oh's practices are more
than fair, hiring more than 75$ of the youth within a 3 mile
area of the La Fiesta Market which is a 56,000 square foot
food warehouse. On-site sale of liquor accounts for less
than 5$ of floor space in total gross sales. Mr. Wiggs
indicated that he was representing the welfare rights
organization, mothers anonymous, the Afro American
components, the Brotherhood Crusade stood with Mr. Oh and
send letters to Los Angeles City Planning Commission in
favor of his efforts. The community clubs supported Mr. Oh
also.
Mr. James Oh rose to speak on his behalf, 3831 Martin Luther
King Jr. Boulevard, spoke of the riots and how his employees
and customers helped protect his store and that he has 3
locations, 103rd Avalon, the Watts area in Los Angeles and
not a single window was broken. Iie stated that he told Mr. �
Karefa-Johnson that he cannot build anymore since he spent
6.5 million dollars to acquire the present market and the I
new market is going to cost 6 million dollars and altogether I
the market will cost 12.5 million dollars. �
Benjamin Maranda, 4336 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, j
spoke on opposition to commissioners who fabricate, and go �
through the neighborhood creating problems with falsehoods. i
He indicated that the individual was not on the Planning
Commission and that one of the duties of a Commissioner is �
to unite the city. I
I
Commissioner Dixon spoke in favor of Mr. Oh's request, �
instead of shopping in other cities we need to shop here in
our city so that we should put our dollars in our city j
instead of spending the dollars in other cities. '
I
Commissioner Lee, spoke also in favor of Mr. Oh's market. '
i
MOTION by Commissioner McMiller, SECONDED by Commissioner !
Lee, to approve Resolution No. 2424 "A RESOLUTION OF THE i
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING THE ,'
TRANSFER OF AN EXISTING OFF-SALE ALCOHOLZC BEVERAGE PERMIT i
FROM EXISTING MARKET TO FRONTZER MARKET AT 3831 E. MARTIN I
LUTHER KING JR. BOULEVARD. IN THE C-2 (LIGHT COMMERCIAL)
ZONE" finding that the project is categorically exempt, from I
the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by I
Section 15061 b(3). Approving Conditional Use Permit No. I
110 subject to the stated conditions and requirements.
F:�Planning�Min\Mayct i
i
I
3
I
MOTIONED by Commissioner McMiller, SECONDED by Commissioner
Lee to approve C.U.P. 110 .
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dixon, Dove, Lee, Muhsin,
McMiller, Pryor
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Pryor, Haynes
ABSTAIN: None
2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 112
Applicant: Rigerberto Flores
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit in
order to establish an automobile tire shop at 12317 Long
Beach Boulevard in the C-2 (Medium Commercial) zone. This
item was continued from the April 14, 1992 Planning
Commission meeting at applicants request.
Mr. Blumenfeld introduced Mr. Barfield, who made the
presentation.
Staff respectfully requested that after due consideration
the Planning Commission deny the request.
Commissioner Dixon stated that they are already in operation
before the C.U.P. has been approved. I
Commissioner Lee clarified that the one that is operation is �
next door to the applicants. �
Mr. Omoruyi informed the Commission that most of the tires '
are used. �
!
Public Hearing was opened.
i
Mr. Williams, 28219 Hazel Lane, Rancho Palo Verdes, gave a �
history of the property. He has submitted to the commission
a letter and statement of expenses incurred trying to get '
his case approved through the City of Lynwood.
Commissioner McMiller stated that the City is over saturated I
with tire shops, and asked the applicant if staff had
recommended another business that could be opened at that
location. ,
Mr. Robert Aenning spoke against the tire shop. �
I
Mr. Jerrell Hunter also rose to speak against the tire shop. �
The applicant rose again to speak, that property would have �
not been purchased if the owner had known that a tire shop �
could not be opened.
MOTIONED by Commissioner Lee, SECONDED by Commissioner Dixon �
I
to deny Conditional Use Permit Case No. 112. �
MOTION carried by the following vote: j
AYES: Commissioners Dixon, Dove, Lee, Muhsin, �
McMiller, Pryor
NOES: None ;
ABSENT: Commissioners Pryor, Haynes !
ABSTAIN: None �
F:\Ptanning�Min\Mayct � ��
¢ i
Commissioner McMiller had to be excused to catch a flight.
3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. 114
Applicant: Louis and Alice Ross
The applicant requested approval of a Conditional Use Permit
to develop a five (5) story, 100 unit motel, and a one (1)
story restaurant at 11550 Long Beach Boulevard, in the C2-A
(Medium Commercial) and P-1 (Parking Overlay) zones.
Staff respectfully requested that after consideration the
Planning Commission continue this item to the next regularly
scheduled meeting of June 9, 1992.
MOTION by Commissioner Lee, SECONDED by Commissioner pove to
continue Conditional Use Permit Case No. 114.
, MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dixon, Dove, Lee, Muhsin, Pryor
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Pryor, Haynes, McMiller
" ABSTAIN: None
Mr. Ross, 11600 Long Beach Blvd. stated some items he did
not underst.and. Mr. Ross referred to a letter which he
received from Staff as to the the requirement for his
° development.
Commissioner Lee explained because this item was being
continued, the commission did not have this information.
4, VARIANCE CASE NO. 14
Applicant: Isabel & Maria Vazquez
The applicant is requesting a variance to reduce required ;
parking from fifteen (15) parking spaces to three (3) spaces �
in order to operate a Garment Factory, manufacturing I
children clothing at 2668 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. �
Commissioner Lee raised some questions as to the lack of I
comments from the Fire Dept. in relation to fire sprinklers,
ventilation, fire extinguishers, etc. and the potential for
a fire at the site due to the nature of the business, the �
amount of exits, and the equipment to be used. Also
questioned was the accessibility of the fire equipment to
the business in case of a fire if the parking spaces were to
be at the front of the business.
Commissioner Lee also questioned the actual future use of �
the building and the amount of employees to be employed at I
the site.
I
Commissioner Dixon questioned the original intended use of
the structure.
Commissioner Lee explained the decision in a variance
affects the entire community for which they are responsible.
I
The applicant's representative took the floor making �
comments on the the written report. He mentioned the
business started five years ago in South Gate. He stressed �
that the business is in need of the license as they are on I
. the verge to cease operations due to hardships. In regards i
to the parking he highlited the fact that 50� of the I
employees were Lynwood residents and lived within walking
distance from the site. Negotiations are going on with �
Jorgensen's Steel to provide additional parking. I
� F:\Plarming\Min\Mayct � . +
5
_ �
• - Commissioner Dixon requested the status on the negotiations
, with Jorgensen's SteeI. He stated that he had been told that �
parking was available.
Commissioner Lee stressed the fact that the employees living
- in the City are currently employed by the business and
therefore no new jobs would be created.
, The applicant stated that this is a small business and in
the future, without the recession, there might be more
-- employment opportunities.
Commissioner Lee stressed the importance of his original
questions to the community. Noted was the fact that since
after the.granting of the variance there will be no further
input from the Planning Commission nor the Fire Dept. which -
makes this decision very difficult. Commisioner Lee asked
if the item was going to be continued until after comments
are received from the Fire Dept.
Commissioner Dixon voiced the comments made by the
representative of the applicants on the fact that he does
not intend to expand and questioned the reasons for the
variance.
Commissioner Lee explained that the site currently has three
parking spaces but the code requires 15 parking spaces.
Commissioner Lee questioned the fact that there is no other
place to put the garbage bin except at the front, where the
three parking spaces are located. Also mentioned was its
proximity to a residential properties.
Commissioner Muhsin concurred with Commissioner Lee's
comments. Commissioner Dixon expressed her concerns about
the lack of parking space for the employees and requested to,
see the agreement with Jorgensen Steele. �
The applicant explained that with that consent the variance
would no longer be needed.
Commissioner pove requested some information regarding the
parking requirements and recommended to continue the item to
verify if the additional parking will become available.
Commissioner Lee then requested verification from the City i
Attorney if the Commission could request additional
comments from the Fire Dept. It was explained that since �
the variance would not be required there will be no need for I
additional comments. �
Commissioner pove moved to continue Variance #14, Agenda
item #5 to the June 9, 1992 meeting. Seconded by �
Commissioner Dixon. ;
!
MOTION carried as follows: !
AYES: Commissioners Dixon, Muhsin, Dove and Lee 1
1
_ NOES: None '
ABSENT: Commissioners Pryor, Hayes and McMiller �
ABSTAIN: None
5. Zonina Ordinance Amendment No. 22
Re-Establishment of Commercial Legal Non-Conforminq I
Applicant: City of Lynwood
The City Council has proposed an amendment to Chapter 25, I
the Official Zoning Ordinance, with reference to the Re-
Establishment of Commercial Legal Non-Conforming uses. �
i
6 !
i
I
Recommended Action
- Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the
Planning Commission continue Zoning Ordinance Amendment No.
22 to the next scheduled meeting.
MOTION by Commissioner Lee and SECONDED by Commissioner
Dixon to continue Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 22 to the
next scheduled meeting. _
AYES: Commissioner Mushin, Dixon, Dove, and Lee.
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Pryor, Haynes, McMiller
ABSTAIN: None
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS
Election of Planning Commission Officials in July.
STAFF COMMENTS
Staff explained the necessity to generate a list of
nominations to the different offices to the July meeting.
Nominations to be held from the floor.
COMMENTS•
. COIN LAUNDRY LOCATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. Staff
reports having held several meeting with coin laundry
industry's representative. It was recommended that the
Commission uses a market analysis to determine the
distribution of uses. The representative.of the coin
laundry businesses in the area have agreed to commission
such a study if there is no cost attached. They would like
to provide said study as part of the Commission's i
consideration for the proposals on uses. Staff respectfully I
request that the Planning Commission request this item to be
brought back to the Commission at the next regularly
scheduled meeting.
DEFINZTIONS OF "BONA-FIDE" RESTAURANTS. Staff is examining
several definitions for recomendation. One of the basic
factors is the standard size of the restaurants.
�
Copies of the Code regarding front yard fences given to all �
the Commissioners.
PUBLIC ORALS �
i
CUP NO. 79 & 80 •
. Mr. Zakari, owner of 3621 Fernwood, was not able to give the '
Commission a tentative date for completion of the project.
COMMISSION ORALS
CUP 75, 10133 Long Beach Boulevard, Frontier Market pole
sign at 3831 Martin Luther King Boulevard.
ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on I
June 9, 1992 at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall Council Chamber, �
11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California.
F:\Plenning\Min\Mayct i
7
' �
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
• PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY, JUNE 9, 1992
OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Call to Order
The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City
of Lynwood was called to order by Chairperson Haynes on the
above captioned date at 7:30 p.m., in the Chambers of
Lynwood City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California
90262.
B. Pledge of Alleaiance
The flag salute was led by Commissioner Haynes, all present
' participated. Chairman Haynes asked everyone to reflect in a
silent prayer for Mr. Kenrick Karefa-Johnson who has
recently pasted away, and also to pray for his family.
C. Roll Call of Commissioners
Chairperson Haynes requested the roll call, and Mr.
Blumenfeld complied.
Present: Commissioner Dixon
Commissioner Haynes
Commissioner Lee
Commissioner McMiller
Commissioner Muhsin �
Commissioner Pryor �
i
Also
Present: Kenneth Fong, Deputy City Attorney - �
Sol Blumenfeld, Acting Community Development Dir. i
Art Barfield, Planning Associate
Louis Omoruyi, Planning Associate -
Louis Morales, Planning Associate
Ted Semaan, Civil Engineering Associate
I
Commissioner Lee spoke with Commissioner pove who was unable
to attend.
MOTION by Commissioner Lee, SECONDED by Commissioner Muhsin, i
to grant an excused absence to Commissioner pove. MOTION
' passed.by unanimous vote.
Mr. Blumenfeld went to the podium to make a presentation to i
commend Chairman Haynes for his tenure as chairman on the �
Planning Commission. He was presented with a gavel from his �
fellow Commissioners, staff and the community. On behalf of �
the City Council Mr. Blumenfeld presented a plaque to i
Chairman Haynes. Pictures were taken with the Mayor Louis J. I
Heine, Chairman Haynes and Mr. Blumenfeld. Chairman Haynes i
made a speech thanking the Mayor, City Council, his fellow
commissioners, staff and the community. �
. I
The Planning Commission held the election for the Planning �
Commission Officers for the coming year which will take �
effect for the July meeting. �
'
i
, j
�
�
f:�Plenning\Mirwtes\JVx992 � �
�
1 �
�
�
!
I
Nominations were made for Commissioners Dove and Dixon.
Commissioner Dixon, Chairperson Haynes, Commissioner Lee, '
and Commissioner McMiller voted in favor of Commissioner
Dixon as the next Chairperson and Commissioners Muhsin and
Pryor voted in favor of Commissioner pove.
There were three votes in favor of Commissioner Dixon and
two votes in favor of Commissioner pove.
MOTION by Chairperson Haynes to elect Commissioner Elizabeth
Dixon, the new Chairperson, and Commissioner pove as the new
Vice-Chairperson.
F. Certification of Agenda Postina �
Mr. Blumenfeld stated the agenda was duly posted per the
Brown Act.
G. Aonroval of Minutes
� Approval of the minutes of May 12 Planning Commission
minutes. Mr. Blumenfeld asked that approval of the May 12th
meeting be given in a subsequent meeting because the minutes
clerk was not available.
Commissioner Lee directed comments to staff.
MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner
Dixon.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: �
1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 114
Applicant: Louis and Alice Ross
COMMENTS:
Applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to develop
a five (5) story, 100 unit motel, and one (1) story �
restaurant at 11550 Long Beach Boulevard, in the C2-A I
(Medium Commercial) and P-1 (Parking Overlay) zones. The
applicant is requesting to continue this item in order to i
comply with the Planning Division and Public Works and
Enqineering Department requirements. I
RECO2�Il�IENDED ACTION: I
Staff respectfully request that after consideration the j
Planning Commission continue this item to permit the '
applicant time to complete plans pursuant to staff
recommendations for Planninq Commission review.
2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 115
Applicant: Ramon Chavez
COMMENTS: i
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use �
Permit in order to develop a three (3) bedroom apartment at '
10932 Virginia Avenue in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) I
zone. �
Mr. Blumenfeld introduced Mr. Barfie2d, who made the I
presentation and said staff recommended approval.
I
f:\Plannirg\Minutes�Jurx992 �
f
I
I
2
i
j
— I
Mr. Barfield stated that at the last Planning Commission
• meeting that the applicant needed to bring back plans
showing his elevations. The applicant did comply with the
request, and revised the plans.
MOTION by Commissioner McMiller, SECONDED by Commissioner
Dixon, to approve Resolution No. 2436, "A RESOLUTION OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 115 TO DEVELOP A THREE (3)
BEDROOM APARTMENT AT 10932 VIRGINIA AVENUE IN THE R-2 (TWO-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA," subject to
all other stated conditions and requirements and certifying
that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions
of the State CEQA.Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b
� •
MOTION carried by the followinq vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dixon, Haynes, Lee, McMiller,
- Muhsin, Pryor
NOES: None '
ABSENT: Commissioner pove
ABSTAIN.: None
3. VARIANCE - CASE NO. 14
' Applicant: Isabel and Maria Vazquez
COMMENTS:
Applicant is requesting a variance to reduce required
parking from fifteen (15) parking spaces to three (3) spaces
in order to operate a Garment Factory, Manufacturinq
Children Clothing at 2668 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard.
, Applicant is requesting that this item be continued to
permit the applicant sufficient time to precipitate a
covenant for the parking. The applicant is still negotiating
with the adjacent property owners at this time.
MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner Lee
to continue case no. 14
AYES: Commissioners Dixon, Haynes, Lee, McMiller,
Muhsin, Pryor
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner pove
ABSTAIN: None
4. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO 22
R�STABLISHMENT OF COMMERCIAL LEGAL NON-CONFORMING
Applicant: City of Lynwood
Mr. Blumenfeld indicated that staff is requesting that this '
- item be continued to permit staff sufficient time to examine
all the issues relative to this proposed amendment.
I
� . f:\Planning\Minutes\JUne992
- , �
3 i
I
. �
, MOTION made by Commissioner Lee, SECONDED by Commissioner
Haynes to continue Zoning Ordinance no. 22:
. AYES: Commissioners Dixon, Haynes, Lee, McMiller, �-
Muhsin, Pryor
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner pove
ABSTAIN: None
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS
5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 110
Applicant: James Oh
Chairperson Haynes addressed legal counsel, City Attorney
Fong as to where the Planninq Commission stood on this case
whether it had to be reheard. Mr. Fonq acknowledged that the
case had to be heard.
Chairperson Fiaynes stressed that he wanted everything to be
legal all down throuqh staf£. He wanted counsel to pay
strict attention to two leqalities and bring.any
inconsistencies to the Commission's attention. Then
Chairperson asked to hear from staff.
Mr. Blumenfeld gave the report. At this time the applicant
is requestinq approval for a Conditional Use Permit to
transfer existing off-sale alcoholic beverages permit from
the existing market to a new 67,726 square foot market at
3831 E. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard in the C-2 (Light
Commercial) zone. On March 10, 1992 during a regularly
scheduled Planning Commission meeting the Planning
Commission approved this request, however on April 14, 1992
during a regularly scheduled meeting a request was made by a
Planning Commissioner to change his vote in this matter in
order to avoid a conf2ict of interest. The vote resulted in
a tie. On May 12, 1992 this case was returned to the
Planning Commission for further consideration. During this
regularly scheduled hearing the Planning Commission approved
this request, however due to an error in notification for
the May 12th public hearing the Planning Commission is
required to hear this request again. At this point Mr.
Blumenfeld turn the report over to Mr. Barfield.
Mr. Barfield stated the property consist of one lot on the
northeast corner of E. Martin Luther Kinq Jr. Boulevard and
Bullis Road. The site is approximately 302,100 square feet "
in size. The subject site is flat containing a 47,003 square
foot food market which is to be demolished after the
construction of the new food market. The zoning to the north
is residential, to the south is commercial, to the east
residential, and the west is residential and commercial. The
general plan of that area to the north is single family,
south commercial, east single family and cluster housing.
The zoning is to the north is R1, south C2 and R1. The
applicant proposes to transfer the existinq off-sale
alcoholic beverages permit from the present Frontier Food
Warehouse to the new 67,726 square foot warehouse market.
This proposed transfer off-sale of alcoholic permit was
f:\Clannirg\Minutes\JUne992
' 4
, approved by the Planninq Commission on April 14, 1992.
' That's essentially the issue the transfer of the alcoholic
beveraqe license from one point at the site to another
. location. Site Plan Review Committee Meeting on February 27,
1992 approved the application. No written response was filed
at the time this report was prepared, however a written
response was received by the Planninq Commission, and
address to Chairperson Haynes and received respectfully from
Mrs. Fletcher, Mrs. Carr and Ms. Thelma Freedman, I believe
the Planning Commissioners received copies of this response.
Chairperson Haynes responded they had received copies.
Under analysis and conclusion the proposed use is consistant
with the General Plan. It is in compliance with development
standards. In terms of environmental assessment, staff has
found that no substantial environmental impact will result
in the proposed transferred use, therefore, the Neqative
Declaration has been filed in the Community Development
Department, in the office of the City Clerk.
Staff respectfully requested that the Planning Commission
adopt the attached resolution no. 2424.
Finding that the Conditional Use Permit Case No. 110 will
not have an effect on the environment and certifying the
Negative Declaration adequate. Approving Conditional Use
Permit No. 110, subject to the stated conditions and
requirements. Mr. Harfield stated that the applicant was
present in the audience, and this concluded Mr. Barfielde
. report.
� Chairperson Haynes asked if there were any question by the
Commissioners for staff. There being none the public hearinq
was opened. Anyone wishinq to speak in favor of Conditional
Use Permit No. 110 was asked to please come forth and speak.
Mr. Robert Henn'1ng, at 3952 Carlin Avenue, Lynwood,
protested there was no reason why one item had to go through
a public hearing over fifteen times. He wanted to state
again as was stated in the last Planning Commission meeting,
the people in this community just went through a riot,
everyones attacking people of oriental extraction regardless
of what the problem is, they want to attack these people. He
indicated that the City of Lynwood could certainly use a new
market. With the loss of Lucky market on Atlantic, Another
market cannot have a liquor permit. We lost Luckys to South
Gate. There is nothing in the world that would be more
benefical to this community than a brand new market, right
where the other market was and that the C.U.P. was simply a
movement of a market, a full functioning market to another
area on the same lot. We need to look deeper into what we
doing, what is the message that we ara sendinq out to
everybody else? Are we saying we don't want anyone of
oriental extracting coming into our community, to upgrade
it, when we see no one ever tried to upgrade that property
_ before at that corner? It was a dying corner, it was a dying
store until Mr. Oh moved in and start making it worth
something. His store now brings in a nice sum of tax money
to this community and we have to look at that and we also
have to look at the upgrade of our city. I urge you to vote
yes on the C.U.P. so we can move on with our community and
move on with some new buildings. Lets get this city back on
the move.
�
I
�
� � f:\Plermirq\Minutes\June992 � I �,
�
I
I
�
5
,. Chairperson Haynes asked if there was anyone else in favor.
Mr. Benjamin Miranda approached the podium, director of
. Concerned Citizens of Lynwood, what I have before me I'm not
directing especially to this commission here. Chairperson
Haynes interupted Mr. Miranda for a brief moment to clearify
if his statements were goinq to be in behave of this case.
� Miranda continued, what he had to say was to prove that
commissioners in this City and other peop2e in this City
that is involved against this project have been taken bribes
and have conspired to hold this man Mr. Oh a fianancial
hostage. He indicated that he was going to file charges
regarding the matter with the District Attorney. Chairperson
Haynes interupted Mr. Miranda, to ask him again if he was
speaking in favor of this case. Mr. Miranda once again
stated he was speaking in behalf of Mr. Oh. Mr. Miranda
stated that he was talking about an attorney that uses
dubious methods to be an obstruction to Mr. Ohs project
which is going to cost the tax payers of this city along
with Mr. oh financial problems. And all of this is being
done through Mr. Oderment, which is Mr. Babays attorney.
_ Games should stop being played in other words. Ask this man
if he has the project completed within a certain period of
time, does the city have to pay fines right along with Mr.
Oh. Mr. Babay wants this property back. All these letters
and petitions are nothing but a shame. I think everyone on
the commission should let Mr. Oh get on with constructing
his business. The rest of the policital bull we will deal
with ourselves. Chairperson Haynes thanked Mr. Miranda as he
left the podium.
Chairperson Haynes acknowledged Councilman Louise Byrd was
in the audience, and thanked him for attending the meeting.
Mr. Harold Tucker rose to speak, 3846 LeSage, this isn't the
first time we've been through this battle. It is a waste of
everyone's valuable time that we have to qo through this
again, we now its bringing revenue to the city, it helps
paying taxes. Without a project like this, I was just
telling someone that I thought St. Francis was number one
tax payer, but I found out they don't bring taxes into the
city. So something like this we bring Mr. Oh to number two
because Jones Lumber is number one. After Mr. Oh gets done
with his project I'm sure Mr. Oh will be number one. I like
to qo through my backyard and go shoppinq instead of two
miles somewhere that would be inconvenient. It is
inconvenient when you see someone trying to build something .
and someone is trying to tear it down. I know worth while.
projects. I don't want to take up too much of your time but
I ask that we make a clear decision with our projects that
we go for progress and behind. We're not living in the wild
wild west, we're living in the future. Mr. Tucker left the
podium.
Mr. Jerrell Hunter, lives at 11301 Hill, as everyone said
we've been over and over and over it's funny to me that this
city went all out to ban smokinq in the city but when we
have a major project a supermarket that not only supplies
jobs but a good produce, good customer relationship with the
community, it brings on good relationships with certain
individuals but we're talking about all walks of life in
this community. Mr. Oh has proved hisself time and time
again. We know that he has a good track record. This is not
� t:lPlanninglMinutes\June992
6
, about a liquor license. Let's face it a market should have
the right to have the best. All the elements it takes to
become a market. During the riots this person was there. He
. ' fed the troops. He fed this community. The prices are good
prices. Lucky left, they are no lonqer here. Alpha Beta I'm
sorry they just don't have it, and I will not tell a friend.
But Mr. Oh at Frontier, I think its time that we start
realizing that we are about this community, and we support
this man. We can not sit back and let a few individuals
dictate our livelihood in this community and its obivous
that we should start addressing the issue, not whether there
` is a liquor license but what is the benefit of this
� community as a whole. This man pays his taxes, so its
obivious its because he's oriental. This man should have the
opportunity to have the best and so should the Lynwood
residents. The facts are clear this man should have the
opportunity to have the best and so should the Lynwood
residents.
Chairperson Haynes asked the audience if anyone else would
like to speak on behalf of the C.U.P. No one responded.
Chairperson Haynes asked if anyone wished to speak opposing
; the liquor license.
Della Mazziotti, who resides on LeSage Street took the
podium. Mrs. Mazziotti addressed the issue of people being
. paid off. She referred to a member of the audience, Mr.
Harold Tucker had been paid to put a.siqn in his yard. She
told the commission that some of the residents don't want
the store but it is being forced upon her.
Chairperson Haynes if anyone else wished to speak opposinq
C.U.P. 110.
Ramona Fletcher, 3824 LeSage, Lynwood, had submitted a
letter to the Commissioners. She informed the Commission
that she would stand by every word that was in that letter.
in addition she would like to repute the facts that were
presented to the Commission and also repute the analysis and
the conclusion that was reached by staff. First of all under
one source of authority. 2) Property location, this is not
one lot, this is twenty lots, numbers 277 through 296 and
track 15016. The ordinance that the commission was asked to
review is to protect the residents, please refer to letter
C,B,E, on page 3. The property size aqain this not one lot,
but twenty, it has a covenant that goes with the land please
see Section C on Page 3. The existing land use is not
correct XXXXXX report. One third is C2 the other two thirds
is P1 property. Under No. 6 the applicant proposes to
transfer the existing off sale beverage permit. She referred
the Commission back to an Ordinance 1306, this cannot be a
, transfer because it is a new site location. This is
, considerated a substantial move in operation therefore
requires a new license. No. 8 Ms. Mazziotti did not
understand, zoning enforcing. No. 9 public response, she
acknowledge that the Commission had received her letter, she
sent it personally, see Section D Page 4. Analysis and
Conclusion 1,) this is incorrect information. The land is P1
per a covenant that runs with the land. Goinq back to the
General Plan, she asked when was the General Plan changed.
According to the Code 25-2823.5 all residents within 300
feet had to be notified and none had received notification,
Section:25-28.2 this injures surround properties. No. 2
complies with development standards please see section B and
E page 2 and 3.
' � f:\7Lannirg\Mirwtes\Jine992 ' �
7
' Mrs. Mazziotti wants to note the letter had been sent to the
Commission long before she saw it. Paqe 1 and 2A throuqh 1
and 12 the recommendation by staff you must not find this
' because it has a siqnificant effect on the environment. it
beinq built 10 feet from homes, as you saw in the letter has
the store been there durinq the riots, the residents would
have lost their property.
Chairperson Haynes reminded Mrs. Fletcher that she had
exceeded her time limit.
Mrs. Fletcher ended her statement by indicating that
Sections 1 and 2 are not correct. To grant this Conditional.
Use Permit would made the Commission a partner to the
unethnical and preferrencial fingings and determinations
. that staff presented to the Commission.
Chairperson asked for the next speaker to approach the
podium wishing to speak.
Patricia Carr, 3842 Le Sage, Lynwood, on March 8 this case
was under new public hearing, is it possible that this case
should go through this process more than once.
Chairperson Haynes directed the question to Kenneth Fong,
City counsel.
Mr. Fong stated that this case is considered a new hearinq �
because we've never a has a hearinq that's been carried
through that has properly complied with notice provisions.
, What happened on March 10, one of the commissioners has a
conflict. Because he withdrew there was no longer a quorum
and no action was taken.
Mrs. Carr went on to say, she has known Mr. Oh for nine
years and has never issued a complaint against his store,
workers or anything else, so she disagreed with the
statement that was made. This is a not racial issue. As far
as their concerns as the residents, it is the impact of the
store and what is has done direct towards us. There is alot
of threat that was here. Everyone is entitled to whatever
legal representation that they chose. As a resident I'm not
here to cause any confusion toward Mr. Oh store. Mrs. Carr
has stated on several occasions she supports the store. She
, was misled two years ago. He was going build the store on
the north corner, on the northeast corner of Martin Luther
King Jr. Boulevard. Now they found out it has changed, so
the residents have the right to complain. The residents have
the riqht as tax payers to make issue with this commission
and any other commission in this city. As far as Mrs. Carr
being a Commissioner this issue does not face her I
Commission. She is on the Housinq Community Advisary Board
not the Planning Commission. When she comes to the Planning
commission she is there as a tax payer. Mrs. Carr addressed
Mrs. Dixon. When Mrs. Dixon made issue about the Genesis, we
supported you. When Mrs. Dixon felt like her property was
being jeopardized, this community got behind you and rallied
behind you full force, Mrs. Carr stood with her. Mrs. Carr
asked that when the Commissioners vote think of the I
residents and what they have to live with. She states that
she is not downing Mr. Oh. Mr. Oh has done a beautiful
thing. She has never talk negative about his store. But when
you dealing with the property values, she has put 30,000 or
40,000 dollars into her home to rebuild it. She is concerned
about rats and roaches will attack her home. So when you
look at that, don't attack her on a raaial issue, lets deal
with the facts at hand. She questions whether it's a
transfer or new establishment. The citys ordinace states the
facts of what a transfer is and I wonder if he meets the
guidelines. Mrs. Carr left the podium.
f:\Plaming\Minutes\Jvx992 -
$ I
Commissioner Dixon asked Chairperson Haynes if she may ask
" Mrs. Carr back to the podium. Chairperson Haynes gave
permission.
�: Mrs. Carr on the Genesis project did you take petitions
around to be signed. Mrs. Carr reply she had not, she was
not asked. Mrs. Dixon asked if Mrs. Carr had paid any of the
money for the petition to be filed, Mrs. Carr said she
' wasn't asked. Mrs. Dixon asked if she stood up and spoke in
her behalf, when she was the target victim. Mr. Carr said
she supported Mrs. Dixon and got the message out to the
community.
Chairperson interupted the questioninq, he felt the meetinq
was getting out of hand. Chairperson Haynes asked if there
was anyone else that would like to speak against the C.U.P.
110?
There being no one else wishinq to speak the meeting was
turn back to the commissioners. Chairperson Haynes stated
that he agreed that everyone has the right to come before
this commission and complain. This is one of the largest
' audiences he has seen in his six years as commissioner and
he hopes it continues. We need businesses like Mr. Ohs, we
need jobs like Mr. Ohs. we are going to have to take some
businesses you don't like. And yes we'er going to have to
live with some things we do not like. But we do have the
� right to demand that Mr. Oh maintains that market so that
you don't have rats and roaches and everything else in your
backyard. But that corner has had a liquor license with the
City of Lynwood for over 30 years. I have looked into it. My
� opinion is we need more businesses. We have lost not only
Lucky, we lost Popeyes Chicken. I resent the fact that
someone comes before this board and say we have a
preconceived notion. We sit here at the wims of the City
Council. Anytime they.want to take we down. If we do not
help build this city somebody will sure tear it down and
before Chairperson Haynes was on the commission it was being
torn down.
Chairperson Haynes announced public hearings are now closed.
Commissioner Lee said he fully supports Mr. Ohs projects.
Its an excellent project. We definitely need jobs. As was
previously stated Luckys market is gone. We've lost a lot of
tax based revenue, with fire from the rioting and looting.
We need someone here that is concerned about this community.
That would bring jobs to this community, that would bring
quality building to this community. Mr. Oh has proposed to
bring a buildinq here that is going to beautify this
` community, and help out the residents in this community by
employing them. I think we should support anyone that would
come iato this community and employour citizens and our
young people. We know the unemployment rate in the nation is
at a all time high at 7.35. Mr. Oh can provide a minimum of
ten jobs, even one job for a citizen of our community, we
should support that person. We know for a fact that with his
track record, he is employing our citizens and our young
people. If no other commissioner has a comment to make, I
would like to move that we approve C.U.P. 110.
Chairperson Haynes stated for the record that Commissioner �
Pryor will not be voting and will not have any public
comments because of his association with Mr. Oh. Mr. Pryor
wi11 not vote or speak.
Commissioner Dixon spoke informing the audience that when
Mr. Oh project was brought to the commission she was not
there to vote on it. As far as Mr. Oh having scaggs, she
does not know anythinq about.it. It has never been brought
to my attention.
. f:\Plannirg\Minutes\JUne992
9
,. Chairperson Aaynes interupted Commissioner Dixon to state
that this was not applicable, the matter at hand was the
issue whether it is legal for Kr. Oh to transfer the
. license. Chairperson Haynes informed the audience that the
Planninq Commission is not the last word and everyone has
the right. But you better be ready for a fight because I'm
going to be there speaking in favor of the man. Chairperson
Haynes asked once again if there was anyone else wishing to
speak in favor of C.U.P. 110.
MOTION by Commissioner Lee, SECONDED by Commissioner Muhsin,
to approve transfer of CUP 110.
MoTioN carried by the followinq vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dixon, Haynes, Lee, McMiller,
Muhsin
- NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Dove
= ABSTAIN: None
Commissioner Pryor did not vote to prevent a conflict of
interest in the case.
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS:
6. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 116
Applicant: Jorge Quirarte
The applicant is requesting approval.for a Conditional Use
Permit (CUP 116) in order to develop a duplex at 11271
Wright Road, in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone.
Staff Planner, Mr. Barfield gave the staff report.
The site is located on the west side of Wright Road and the
south side of Beechwood Avneue. The site is an irregular
shaped lot and is approximately 11,410 square feet in size.
" The existing land use for the area is single family, multi-
family and a public school. The general plan for this area
is multi-family residential including as well as industrial
townhouse and cluster housing. The zoninq is R-3 in the
north and R-3 on the south, R-3 on the east and the west.
The applicant purposes to develop two attached two story
dwellinq units, with the living room, dining room, kitchen,
three bedrooms and two car qaraqe with each dwelling unit.
The purposed cost of the exisitng dwellinq will be inproved
with the new two car garage. Also the minimum of 25�
landscaping, 27� of the land area . On May 28th, 1992 the
site plan review committee evaluated the proposal and
approved it subject to the specific state requirements. The
public response is not a matter of record at the time this
report was prepared. The project will be a benefit to the
community and the proposed development will enhance the
neighborhood be a catalyst to other quality designs in the
neighborhood.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
The community development department plus staff has
determined that that the project is categorically exempt as
required in section 15061 b. 3 State of California quality
act 1989 as amended.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff respectfully request that after consideration the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2437.
f:\Planning\Mirw[es\JUne992
1�
� A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt,
. from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as
amended by Section 15061 b(3).
8. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 116, subject to
the stated conditions and requirements.
Public Hearinq on C.U.P. 116 was opened and Mrs. Gloria
Quirarte, 11271 Wright Road, Lynwood, came to the podium to
. say that she has seen the community grow, and ask that she
is given the opportunity to grow with it.
Commissioner Lee asked if the applicant would have any
objections to changing the roofing of the new house and put
tile roofing. Commissioner Lee explained that the City of
Lynwood would like for all new development to change to tile
roofing. He asked the applicant to work.with staff to select
the actual type of material the applicant will be using.
Mrs. Quirarte said she would comply with any recommendations
tha't are made.
Commissioner McMiller asked if anyone wished to speak
against C.U.P. 116, there being no one, public hearing was
closed.
. MOTION by Commissioner Lee, SECONDED by Commissioner Dixon,
to approve CUP 116. ,
AYES: Commissioners Dixion, Haynes, Lee, McMiller,
Muhsin, Pryor
NOES: None
ABSENT': Commissioners Dove
ABSTAIN: None
7. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 117
Applicant: Abraham Ponce
The applicant is requesting approval for a Conditional Use
Permit (CUP 117) in order to develop a duplex at 11359, in i
the R-2 (Two Family Residential) zone. ,
Staff Planner, Mr. Omoryui gave the staff report.
The site is located on the east side of Duncan Avenue
between Sanborn Avenue and Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. The
site consist of a triangler shaped lot approximately 6,900
square foot. The applicant purposes to develop a duplex with
two car qarage per units. The first floor shall consist of a
living room, dining room, kitchen, half bath and laundry i
room. The second includes three bedrooms and a full bath. On
May 28, 1992 the site plan review committee violated the
proposed development and recommended approval to the
p2anning commission subject to specific requirements.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: I
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution 2438. �
A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt, �
from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as_ i
amended by Section 15061 b(3).
B. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 117, subject to
the stated conditions and requirements.
f:\F l ann i ng\M i rwtes\JUx992
11
Abraham Ponce, 15718 Orizaba, paramount, agreed to all the
conditions. _
Commissioner Pryor asked applicant how often the lot had
been cleaned? Mr. Ponce replied it had recently been
cleaned.
Mr. Barfield stated that keeping the lot clean was one of
- the conditions.
Chairperson Haynes asked if anyone else wished to speak,
there being no one else, the public hearing was closed.
MOTIONED by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner
Dixon to approve C.U.P. 117.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dixon, Haynes, Muhsin,
McMiller, Pryor
- NOES: None
- ABSENT: Commissioner pove
ABSTAIN: None
Commissioner Lee not present at this time.
8. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 118
, Applicant: Robert Terrell
The applicant is requesting approval f a Conditional Use
Permit to develop 18 multi-family units on a lot located on
Esther Street, west of State Street at Virginia Avenue in
the R-1 (Single Family Residential) zone. Staff request that
this case be continued. This request is made, in order to
provide time for the applicant to further examine
development issues including several easements which occur
on the proposed development site. The applicant will return
with revised plans for Commission review at the next
scheduled Planning Commission Meeting.
RECOMASENDED ACTION• . ,
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the
. Planninq Commission continue this case to the next scheduled I
meetinq of July 14, 1992. . I
I
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dixon, Haynes, Lee, Muhsin,
McMiller, Pryor
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner pove,
ABSTAIN: None
9, ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - CASE NO. ZOA 23 I
Applicant: City of Lynwood f
The City of Lynwood is considering an amendment to Chapter
25, Section 10.1 F.5 of the Official Zoning Ordinance with
respect to the regulation of Coin Laundries, Amendment of
C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone standards City-wide.
f:\Plamirq\Minutes\JUx992 � �
�
I
12 �
�
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the
Planninq Commission continue this item in order to provide
additional time to fully examine the issues relative to the
proposed amendment.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dixon, Haynes, Muhsin,
McMiller, Pryor
' NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner pove,
ABSTAIN: None
Commissioner Lee not present at the time.
10.� ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - CASE NO. ZOA 24
Applicant: City of Lynwood
The City of Lynwood is considering an amendment to Chapter
25, Section 4.2-a of the official Zoning Ordinance with
respect to regulating Family Day Care Home standards City-
� wide.
The City of Lynwood is proposing to amend Chapter 4 and
• Chapter 5 of the official family day care with respect to
regulete family day care standards in R-1 residential zones.
The proposed amendment will permit large family day care
homes and limit the process the same fees for C.U.P. to
$800.00.
City counsel Mr. Fonq interupted Mr. Omoruyi to state that
last year Mr. Karefa-Johnson and the another City attorney
had recommended that the $800.00 permit fee be waived for '
family day care homes in order to comply with the state law.
Chairperson Aaynes recommended that this case be continued,
at the next reqularly scheduled meeting so that staff may �
have time to due research on this matter, so that the public
may be corrected informed.
RECOMU�NDED ACTION:
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the
Planning Commission continue this item in order to provide
additional time to fully examine the issues relative to the
, proposed amendment.
MOTION carried by the following vote: �
AYES: Commissioners Dixon, Haynes, Lee, Muhsin, I
McMiller, Pryor I
NOES: None
I
ABSENT: Commissioner pove, ;
ABSTAIN: None I
i
I
f:\Planniny\Mirwtes\J�ne992 ' .
I
I
�
13 �
I
• 11. PLANNED COt�Il�SERCIAL DEVEIAPMENT - CASE NO PCD1
Applicant: The City of Lynwood
• The City of Lynwood is proposing to establish a Planned
Commercial Development District (PCD No.l) within the
Redevelopment Project Area "A" bounded in the North by
Abbott Road, in the South by Imperial Highway, in the East
by Atlantic Avenue and irregularly in the West, encompassing
aproximately 10.2 acres.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff respectfully request that aftex consideration the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2446.
A. Finding that the Planned Commercial Development, Case
No. PCD 1, will not have a significant effect on the
environment and certifying the Negative Declaration as
adequate.
B. Approving a Planned Commercial Development District,
_ Case No. PCD 1 subject to the stated conditions and
requirements.
Public Orals were opened. Mr. Cammeron, with the Sealy
Company, he is the Real Estate broker representing Central
Appliances. He is willing to comply with all the conditions.
Robert Michelin 6728 State Street, Huntington Park was not
against the project but wanting to know if 10955 Atlantic
Avenue would be effected by this project.
Mr. Blumenfeld stated that at this point the City has no
plans to acquire his property.
There no one else speaking against PCD 1 public orals were
closed.
MOTIONED by Commissioner Lee, SECONDED by Commissioner Pryor
to approve Resolution no. 2423, PCD 1. ;
MOTION carried by the following vote: l
I
AYES: Commissioners Dixon, Haynes, Lee, Muhsin,
McMiller, Pryor
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner pove �
ABSTAIN: None , �
12. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CASE NO. GPA NO. 5
Applicant: Robert Terrell �
The applicant has filed a request for a General Plan (GP 5)
from R-1 (Single-Family Residential) zone to R-3 (MUlti-
Family Residential) zone, and related Conditional Use Permit
(CUP No. 118) and Zone Change (ZC 4) in order to develop 18
Multi-Family dwelling units on a 39,032 square foot vacant
parcel on Esther Street and Virginia Avenue in Lynwood, I
California.
i
, �
. f:\Planning\Minutes\JUne992
�
�
I
� � �
14 �
�
� I
. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
. Staff respectfuly requests that the Planning Commission
continue this item to the next scheduled Commission meeting
in order to provide time for the applicant to further
examine development issues including several easements which
occur on the proposed development site. The applicant will
return with revised plans for Commission review at the next �
scheduled Pianning Commission meeting.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dixon, Haynes, Muhsin,
McMiller, Pryor
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner pove,
ABSTAIN: None
� Commissioner Lee was not present at that time.
13. DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT REVISION & EIR ADDENDUM
Pursuant to City Council direction, is proposing a
revision to the Housing Element of the City of Lynwood
General Plan in order to bring the Housing Element into .
, conformance'with State requirements mandated under Sections
65583 (a), (b) and (c) of the Government Code. The draft
Fiousing Element Revision addresses city-wide housinq goals,
, objectives and programs. An initial hearing_on the Draft
circulation of the document ad EIR Addendum in order to
obtain public comment. Following the circulation period, the
Draft Housinq Element Revision and EIR Addendum will be
presented for a final hearinq by City Planning Commission
and City Council.
' RECOt�Il�SEDED ACTION• �
Staff respectfully requests that the Planning Commission
receive the Draft Revised Housinq Element arid EIR Addendum
for review and public comment and that the matter be
returned for final review and approval at the regularly
scheduled Planninq Commission meeting ia July 14, 1992 in
order to provide sufficient time to obtain public comment
for incorporati"on in the Draft document.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dixon, Lee, Muhsin, McMiller
Pryor
NOES: None
ABSENTs Commissioner pove, I
ABSTAIN: Chairperson Haynes
_ REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS 1
I
None
'f:\Plenning\Mirwtes\Jine992 .
�
15 �
�
STAFF COMMENTS
' Report on coin laundry, staff has not been able to obtain
market study regarding coin laundry, there is some cost
involved. Staff would like us to address this issue again at
the next meeting.
Report on proposed definition for "bona-fide" restraurant.
Staff would like us to address this issue again at the next
meeting for final approval and make it an amendment to the
code.
Report on Planning Department Budget for conferences the
amount allocated for the present budget is still intact, but
next years budget information is still on hold.
C.U.P. 75, 10133 Long Beach Boulevard, it was denied
approximately one year ago when applied for by meat market
for a liquor license based on the residential properties to
the north this does not make this application desirable.
Staff recommended denial, but it is up to the Planning
Commission whether they should reapply.
Staff has prepared a draft general plan summary to have the
commission look at after the general meeting.
PUBLIC ORALS
Linda Mitchell, 11222 Thorson regardfng the family day care
suggest there be no fee.
Mrs. Fletcher, wanted to state she is not against Frontier
market only its placement. She suggest staff get an
enivornmental impact report.
Mrs. Carr, commented that Chairman Haynes performance as
chairperson of the Planning Commission and that Commissioner
Dixon is well qualified chairperson. On C.U.P. 110 she wante
to inform the commission and council that there is nothing
they could do to, this will end in the courtrooms. She has
already attain leqal counsel, its at the point that if an
injunction has to be filed she will. She was denied due
process and did not receive proper notification. The means I
of which the covenant was deleted is an issue. Mrs. Carr
came to state her views on this matter. She has tried to
meet with Mr. Oh and the City Council but no one has put '
forth the effort to work with her. Mrs. stated this is not
over and it is out of the commission and councils hands.
Councilman Bryd came forth to the podium and stated that the I
City can not stand still, and must move forward or stand �
still. He feels Frontier market project will benefit the �
community greatly. He is in favor of the project personally. �
The people who have a problem with this project he feels it �
is personal, but it could be a concern because it is in I
their back yard.But in the spirit of cooperation we should i
move forward and opposition to it should be dropped.
�
COMMISSION ORAIS I
�
Commissioner Lee said at 11398 Ernestine Avenue, the garage
had been closed and a new one had been built but there was
no driveway leading to the new garage, and the old driveway
still existing leading to the converted garage. At 11263
Wright Road, there are apartments with rio landscaping, no
driveway and people are residing there. The blue apartments i
at 11307 Wright Road, the stucco has falling out and you can
see the pipes. At 3181 Imperial Highway a business called
the Lynwood Sound Machine has a wooden sign and also there,
appears to be another business in the garage and do they
have a business license. Also at that location the entrance
has been boarded,
i
I f:\Planning\Minutes\June992
I
�
16
Commissioner Muhsin congratulated Commissioner Dixon on her
' nomination s as the new chairperson.
Commissioner Dixon many building in City have boards on the
.. windows. At 12139 Atlantic there is a new car lot, also at
the motel at Agnes and Long Beach Blvd. that has also become
a car lot. Commissioner Dixon thanked Chairperson Haynes for
having her on the commission.
Chairperson Haynes thanked Mayor Heine and Councilman Bryd.
Chairperson Haynes stated that the purpose of the Planning
Commission is to hear the residents. everyone has the right
to come before the Commission and City Council no matter
what nationality.
Chairperson Haynes then proceeded to have Commissioner Dixon
take his place as the new Chairperson of the Lynwood
_ Planning Commission.
AA70URNMENT
Adjourn to the regular meetinq of the Planning Commission on
July 14, 1992 at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall Council
Chamber, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California.
" � I
I
I
�
I
; �
�
i
.` � �
-
, i
� ��
�
�
!
�
' �
_ �
I
i
�
�
I
` f:APLemirpVlinutesVJVx992 , �
I
I
17 I
(
I
LYNWOOD CITY PIaNNING COl�MISSION
RSGUI,�R ISBETING, JULY 14, 1992
The Lynwood City Planning Commission met in a Regular Session in
the Council Chambers of Lynwood City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, on
the above date at 7:30 p.m.
Commissioner Dixon in the Chair.
The flag salute was led by Chairperson Dixon. All present
participated.
Commissioners Dove, Muhsin, Pryor, Lee and Dixon answered the
roll call.
Acting Director of Community Development Soi Blumenfeld announced
Commissioner Haynes had been called away on business.
Also present were Deputy City Attorney Kenneth Fong, Acting
Director of Community Development Sol Blumenfeld, Senior Planner
Charles Range2, Planning Associate Art Barfield, and Associate
Planner Louis Morales.
It was moved by Commissioner Muhsin, seconded by Commissioner Lee
to excuse Commissioner Haynes and Commissioner McMiller.
Immediately following the motion Commissioner Mctiiller arrived at
7:35 p.m.
Chairperson Dixon asked for a new motion.
It was moved by Commissioner Muhsin, seconded by Commissioner Lee �
to excuse Commissioner Haynes.
B4LL GI,L •
aYB3: . DOVS, XUHSIL/, Mc�[ILLffit, PRYOR, LEE, DIXON I
NOES : l�ONB I
l�BSSNT: HAYlfS3 +
Mr. Blumenfeld stated the Agenda had been duly posted according
to the Brown Act.
I
I
�
I
I
I
r
4
Mr. Blumenfeld announced that staff was unable to complete the �
minutes in time for the meeting, due to the resiqnation of the
minutes clerk. Stated that the minutes would be available for
_ review the followinq week and ready for approval at the next
meeting.
It was moved by Commissioner Muhsin, seconded by Commissioner Lee
that approval of the minutes for May 12, 1992, June 9, 1992 and
July 14, 1992 be continued to the August 11 meeting
ROLL CALL
AYES: DOVS, li[JHSIN, ![cMILLSR, PRYOR, LEB, DIXON
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: HAYNES
Commissioner Lee announced the presence of new.staff inembers and
asked for introductions.
Mr. Blumenfeld introduced Charles Rangel, Senior Planner from
Wildan Associates and Rita Manibusan, minutes clerk.
Chairperson announced it wa§ time to open the Continued Public
' Hearing on:
ZONING ?iIi$NDl�lPP C?,SB NO. 18
Mr. Blumenfeld requested the City's consideration of an amendment
to Chapter 4 and Chapter 25 of the Official Zoning Ordinance with
respect to requlatinq Family Day Care Hame Standards. Stated
this item.had been continued from the last Planninq Commission
meeting a^d in accordance with the current State Ordinance, staff
is requesczng adoption of Resolution ,�2445 snd approval of Zoning
Ordinance Amendment Case No: 18.
Commissioner pove questioned provisions with regard to multi-
family dwelling, and concerns towards overcrowdinq. Asked whether i
or not there were any restrictions in residential areas.
Charles Rangel, Senior Planner refered to Section (b) of the
Ordinance with respect to applidants responsibility towards �
maintaining unobstruction of streets and driveways. I
Commissioner pove stated concerns on disturbances and noise
nuisances in residential area.
After further disCUSSion it was moved by Commissioner Lee,
seconded by Commissioner Muhsin to approve and adopt:
RESOLUTION IIO. Z445 "?i RSSOLUTION OF TH$ pL�iliNING COI4[ZSSION OF
TFiE CITY OF LYIiWOOD, RECOl�NDING TO CHAPTSR 4 aND C!i?iPTSR 25 OF
THE LYNWOOD MiTNICIPAL CODB RBLATII(G TO FIl![ILY DAY Ca�iRS HONS
STANDP,RDS�
i
�
�
_ �
,
� ttor�, cua.-
�,YSS: DOVB, MUHSIN, Kc![ILLER, PRYOR, L$S, DIXON
NOES: NONE
�,BSSNT: HAYNB3
Commissioner Dixon announced:
Conditional Use Perait No. 114, l►pplicant: Louis and ?,lice Ross
Mr: Blumenfeld described continued item. Stated that on June 30,
1992, applicant submitted inadequate plans, which precluded
completion of the project environmental assessment Therfore,
staff is recommending continuance of item in order for applicant
to prepare traffic and soil studies. Also stated staff's
concerns on hazardous substances as a result of the nearby
ezisting.gas station .
It was moved by Commissioner Lee, seconded by Commissioner pove
to continue item to Planning Commission meeting of September 14,
1992.
ROI,I, C2ii.i, ;
liYBS: DOVE, IiUHSIN, 1ScMILLffi2, I,EB, DIXON
NOES: PRYOR
AB.SSIiT: AAYNSS
It was moved by Commissioner Lee, seconded by Commissioner pove
to open Public Orals.
ROId, CaI.I,: .
:�Y&S: DOVS, MUHSIN, KCMILI.SR, pRYOR, LSB, DIXON
NOBS: NONE
71BSS[iT: EiAYNffi
Louis Ross spoke reqarding the Commissions decision to continue I
and problems that he had encountered over the years with the City ;
of Lynwood, Staff and the Planning Commission. Stated he had
already corrected several of the City's requirements and was
still unable to obtain approval for his project. j
LeRoy Abelson Attorney, spoke on behalf of Mr. Ross. Stated he ;
had been working with Mr. Ross to bring this project up to '
staff's recommendations, and would like to work with staff on �
specifications and requirements. �
i
After further discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Lee, i
seconded by Commissioner Muhsin to close Public Orals at this
time.
I
�
�
�
- I
i
I
I
i
I
I
i
I
I
�
�
I
� Hr. Blumenfeld stated staff had committed an extensive amount of
time to the project in an effort to help this project go forward.
Also, that on June 18, a letter was sent documentinq major items
recommended by Public Works that needed to be addressed, and that
many of the deficiencies noted in the plans hd not yet been
addressed. Mr. Blumenfeld also stated that an inadequate project
phasing plan had been submitted, which would be important for a
project of this nature which incorporates existing and new
development.
ROLL CaL�I.
1,YES: DOVS, MUHgIN, I�clIILLHR, PRYOR, LSB, DIXON
NOES: NONE
aBSSNT: H2�YNES
Chairperson Dixon announced:
Variance - Case No. 14, 7►pplicant: Isable i 1(aria Vazquez
Mr. Blumenfeld requested staff withdraw this item due to
applicants inability to complete a covenant for additional
parking.
it was moved by Commissioner pove, seconded by Commissioner Pryor
to withdraw the item.
ROLL CaI,L;
aYBS: DOVH, M7HSIN, I�lIILLSR, PRYOR, LEB, DIXON '
NOBS: NONB �
1,HSEt1T: lU1YNSS
Chairperson Dixon announced: '
Zoninq Ordinance l,aen�ent - Case No. ZOA 23, P,pplicant: City of I �
Lynvood i
Mr. Blumenfeld stated that the City of Lynwood under the Planning I
Commission recommendation investigate potential to regulate coin �
laundries, stated staff was unable to obtain a consensus at this
time for preparation for a Market Study. He noted that there �
was insufficient co-operation from local operators to produce ;
such a study. Therefore, staff was requestinq withdrawal of this i
item from the 1►genda.
I
After further discussion it was moved by Commissioner pove, i
seconded by Commissioner Pryor to withdraw this item
F30LL CaI.L • i
'''Y�+: • DOVE, MUHSI21, 1�cMILLffit, PRYOR, I,BS, DIXON �
NOBS: NpNg
ABSSNT: HAYNBS �
i
i
I
I
�
i
i
I
�
I
�
I
Chairperson Dixon introduced:
• Zone Change - Case tZC4, applicant: Robert W. Terrell
Mr. Blumenfeld stated Agenda Items �5, 6 and 7 were all related
to the same project and could all be acted upon by one motion.
Stated applicant had requested items be withdrawn, due to site
plan restraints which were recognized upon site plan review.
Zt was moved by Commissioner pove, seconded by Commissioner
McMiller to withdraw Agenda Items �5, 6 and 7.
ROLL C.�ii,L:
AYES: DOVB, K[JHSIN, ![c�[ILLSR, pRYOR, LSB, DIXON
NOES: NONE
l,BSBNT: H]�YNFS
Chairperson Dixon introduced:
Draft Housinq Eleaent Revision and BIR �ddendua
Mr. Blumenfeld stated item had been presented at previous
Planning Commission meeting and requested Commission continue
this item until the next reqular scheduled .meeting of Auqust 11,
1992.
It was moved by Commissioner Muhsin, seconded by Commissioner
McMiller to continue item to August 11, 1992.
ROLL CALi. • �
aYHS: . DOVH, MUHSIN, l�clQLLER, PRYOR, LSB, DIXON I
NOSS: NONE
2iBSSNT: H�YNBS I
�
NEW Ca.SBS • �
Chairperson Dixon introduced: I
Conditional Ose Peraft - Case No. 119, appiicant Paul Zerounian
Mr. Blumenfeld stated applicant is requesting Conditional Use i
Permit in order to establish a Market selling off-sale alcohol
beverages at 10404 Lonq Beach Blvd. !
Art Barfield Planning Associate spoke on this item. Stated I
applicant wishes to re-establish a Market with a Conditional Use �
Permit for off-sale alcoholic beveraqes and stated site plan
review recommended denial also, location was not in accordance
with City Ordinance x1306 pertaininq to 500 feet distance between
locations. In conclusion, staff requeste Planning Commission
deny Conditional Use Permit �`119 based on the information �
provided.
i
i
I
�
�
I
i
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
�
I
It was moved by Chairperson Dixon to open Public Hearing
Paul Zerounian, 1317 Ametus St., Redondo Beach, CA, spoke on his
own behalf, listing his reasons for approval of Conditional use
Permit.
Commissioner Lee questioned length of time business has been in
existance without Conditional Use Permit.
Mr. Zerounian stated since 1987.
After further discussion,
Mr. Barfield again stated location was not in accordance with
Ordinance #1306 requirement of 500 feet.
Commissioner pove questioned existing liquor establishment.
Commissioner Muhsin questioned owners ever having existing liquor
license.
� After further discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Lee,
seconded by Commissioner McMiller to approve staffs
recommendation.
RQI,I, C?,LI,
?iY$S: !!ClIILLER, LBS
NOBS: PRYOR, DIXON
ABS�7T: HAYNES
aBST.�IN: DOVB, I;()gSIN
Motion failed.
Deputy City Attorney Fong stated no action had been taken due to
commissioners vote. ,
After further discussion, clarification was made on Commissioner
Lee's motion.
Zt was then moved by Commissioner Lee, seconded by Commissioner
McMiller to deny Conditional Use Permit �119.
ROI,i, CALI,:
aYES: 1�H3I1/, MCIIILLffit, PRYOR, LBB, DIXON
NOES: NONS
?iBSTlIIN: DOVS
ABSSIi'P: AAYIfSS
Chairperson Dixon informed applicant he has fifteen (15) days to
file an appeal with the City Council.
I
I —
. -
� Chairperson Dixon introduced:
Case :120, Conditional ilse Permit, applicant: abrahaa Ponce
Mr. Blumenfeld stated staffs recommendation that item be
continued in order for the applicant to revise site plan.
It was moved by Commissioner pove, seconded by Commissioner Lee
to continue this item.
ROLL CALL•
, AYBS: • DOVE, MtJHSIN, lic![IIS,SR, PRYOR, LBE, DIXON
NOSS: NONE
ABSBNT: H2,YNBS
Chairperson Dixon introduced:
Zoning Ordinance aaend�ent No. ZOa 24
Mr. Blumenfeld stated the Citys amendment to Chapter 25, section
2.1 and 8.1 of the Official Zoning Ordinance with respect to a
specific definition of restaurant use. Request was made to more
effectively regulate on-sale alcohol beverage permits with
respect to bonafide restaurants. Staff respectfully requests that
the Planning Commission adopt Resolution ;�2449.
Commissioner pove requested the Ordinance be amendend to include
the wording of."maximum capacity of 200 people°.
After further discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Lee,
seconded by Commissioner pove to approve with amendments:
RESOLDTION NO. 2449 SNTITLSD: a RS.SOLUTION OF THE CITY CODNCIL OF
TfiB CITY OF LYNfi00D RSCO2�4SEtIpING CITY 2iDOPTION OF �,N �tID�[SN'P Tp
CHI�PTSR.S 25 OF TEIE IlUNICIPtii, G WITfi RBSP$CP TO RS,S'PAURAN'P USB,
CITY WIDS.• -
ROLL CaLI, •
�lYBS: DOVS, K[niSIIT, !(cXlLi,g[t, F12YOR, LSS, DIXOIV
NOES: NONE
2iBSffi1T: E�YNB3
Chairperson Dixon called meeting back to reqular order of
business and asked for staff comments.
Mr, Blumenfeld stated staff's recommendations to standardize I
roofinq materials for remodeling or new development. Several
samples had been gathered and a display was befng prepared. Also i
spoke on Area Plan for the Greenline Transit Station. i
Hearing no comments on Public Orals, Chairperson Dixon called for
Commission Orals.
� I
. (
�
I
�
,.. .
,
• Commissioner Pryor questioned Mr. Ross' ability to work with
staff and whether or not he has complied with recommendations by
staff.
Mr. Blumenfeld spoke on Mr. Ross' long involvement with the City
relative to the project approval. He indicated that the project
was only submitted for consideration in April of this year and
that it had been continued once at the applicants request. He
indicated that he advised Mr. Ross to hire professionals to
assist him with the project because it was relatively comples
involving property asquisitions, vacations, etc. Also stated Mr.
Ross' previous plans had been poorly drawn and inadequate and
could not be reviewed for processing, and Mr. Ross' location in
the General Plan.
Commissioner Pryor questioned his conflict of interest should he
, bid on project.
Commissioner Muhsin inquired about Commission pictures and
acknowledgment of former Commissioners.
Mr. Blumenfeld spoke on tribute to Kenrick Karefa-Johnson.
, Commissioner Lee questioned single family home on Louise Ave. &
Bullis Road.
Chairperson Dixon spoke on yard sales and home improvement
contests.
It was mov.ed by Commissioner Pryor, seconded by Commissioner pove
to adjourn to the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planninq
Commission on August il, 1992.
� Eli2abeth Dixon, Chairperson
APPROVED ?,S TO CONTENT: • APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sol Blumenfeld Kenneth Fong
Development Services Deputy City Attorney
Manger