The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About1992-06-09 PLANNING COMMISSION , ,� . AQBNDA LYNWOOD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - 7:30 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers iisso suiiis Roaa, Lynwooa, ca R E C E 1!I E D I CITY OF LYNWOOU CITY CLERKS 4F�ICE '. sune a, 1992 JUV U4 1992 p!� PNI '�i8i9�l0�lli12i1�2i3i4i5i6 � John K..Haynes Chairperson '. Jamal Muhsin Carl•ton McMiller Vice Chairman Commissioner Elizabeth Dixon Roy Pryor Commissioner Commissioner Donald A. Dove Errick Lee, , Commissioner Commissioner C O M M I S S I 0 N C O U N S E L: Henry S. Barbosa Kenneth Fong City Attorney Deputy City Attorney STAFF: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Director Sol Blumenfeld Community Development Department Development Services Manager Art Barfield Louis Omoruyi Planning Associate Planning Associate John Oskoui Assistant Director Public Works . f:agenda:june9 1 � June 9, 1992 OPENING CEREMONIES A. Call meeting to order. B. Flag salute. C. Roll call of Commissioners. D. Presentation to Chairperson Haynes. E. Election of Planning Commission Officers. F. Certification of Agenda Posting. G. Approval of minutes for tha May 12, 1992 Planning Commission ! Meeting. CONTINIIED PQBLIC HEARINd: l. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 114 Applicant: Louis and Alice Ross COMMENTS: � The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to ' develop a five (5) story, 100 unit motel, and one (1) story , restaurant at 11550 Long Beach Boulevard, in the C2-A (Medium Commercial) and P-1 (Parking Overlay) zones. The applicant is requesting to continue this item in order to comply with the Planning Division and the Public Works and Engineering j Department requirements, On May 20, 1992 the applicant � submitted a letter to staff requesting that this item be � continued by the Planning Commission. In order to comply � with requirements set forth by the Planning Division and Public Works Department in a letter to the Planning Commission dated May il, 1992 (see attachments). This item has been continued from the May 12, 1992 Planning Commission � meeting at Staff request. i RECOMMENDED ACTION: ! Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the � Planning Commission continue this item to permit the applicant time to complete plans pursuant to staff ' recommendations for Planning Commission review. 2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO 115 Applicant: Ramon Chavez ; COMMENTS I The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use ' Permit in order to develop a three (3) bedroom apartment at 10932 Virginia Avenue in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. RECOMMENDED ACTION: i Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2436. � A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt, from i the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by '�, Section 15061 b (3). B. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 115, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. f : ageMa: J une9 � 2 I �i � 3. VARIANCE - CASE NO. 14 Applicant: Isabel & Maria Vazquez COMMENTS The applicant is requesting a variance to reduce required parking from fifteen (15) parking spaces to three (3) spaces in order to operate a Garment Factory, Manufacturing Children Clothing at 2668 Martin Luther king Jr. Boulevard. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission continue this item to permit the applicant to complete a covenant for parking. 4. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 22 RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMERCZAL LEGAL NON-CONFORMZNG i Applicant: City of Lynwood I COMMENTS � , The City Council has proposed an amendment to Chapter 25, the ' Official Zoning Ordinance, with reference to the Re- ! Establishment of Commercial Legal Non-Conforming uses. RECOMMENDED ACTION � Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the i Planning Commission continue Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. i 22 to the next schedule meeting of July 14, 1992, in order to � provide additional time to fully examine the issues relative , to the proposed amendment. . NEW PUBLIC HEARINGB: 5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 110 i Applicant: James Oh COMMENTS: i The applicant is requesting approval for a Conditional Use Permit to transfer existing off-sale alcoholic beverages permit from the existing market to a new 67,726 square foot market at 3831 E. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard in the C-2 (Light Commercial) zone. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2424. A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt, from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b (3). i B. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 110, subject to the ' stated conditions and requirements. 6. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 116 Applicant: Jorge Quirarte COMMENTS � The applicant is requesting approval for a Conditional Use i Permit (CUP 116) in order to develop a duplex at 11271 Wright � Road, in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone. f:agenda:June9 . . 3 � � RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2437. A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt, from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 {3). B. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 116, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. 7. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 117 Applicant: Abraham Ponce COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting approval for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP 117) in order to develop a duplex at 11359, in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. RECOMMENDED ACTION: . Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2438. A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt, from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b (3j. B. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 117, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. 8. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 118 Applicant: Robert Terrell COMMENTS The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop 18 multi-family units on a lot located on Esther Street, west of State Street at Virginia Avenue in the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) zone. Staff request that this case be continued. This request is made to allow the applicant to address issues regarding the site plan that does ' not accurately indicate property easements, and, other pertinent development information required for reviewing the 'proposed development. Zn order to provide time for the applicant to Purther examine development issues including several easements which occur on the proposed development site. The applicant will return with revised plans for Commission review at the next scheduled Planning Commission Meeting. RECOMMENDED ACTION � , Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission continue this case to the next scheduled meeting of July 14, 1992. 9. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - CASE NO. ZOA 23 Applicant: City of Lynwood COMMENTS The City of Lynwood is considering an amendment to Chapter 25', Section 10.1 F.5 of the Official Zoninq Ordinance with respect to the zegulation of Coin Laundries, Amendment of C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone standards City-wide. f:agenda:June9 4 RECOMMENDED ACTION: R ' Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission continue this item in order to provide additional time to fully examine the issues relative to the proposed amendment. 10. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - CASE NO. ZOA 24 Applicant: City of Lynwood COMMENTS The City of Lynwood is considering an amendment to Chapter 25, Section 4.2-a of the Official Zoning Ordinance with respect to regulating Family Day Care Home standards City- wide. ` RECOMMENDED ACTZON: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2425. , A. Finding that the Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Case No. ZOA 24, will not have a significant effect on the environment and certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate. � B. Approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Case No. ZOA 24 subject to the stated conditions and requirements. 11. PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT - CASE NO. PCD 1 Applicant: The City of Lynwood COMMENTS The City of Lynwood is proposing to establish a Planned Commercial Development District (PCD No. 1) within the Redevelopment Project Area "A" bounded in the North by Abbott Road, in the South by Imperial Highway, in the East by Atlantic Avenue and irregularly in the West, encompassing approximately 10.2 acres. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning.Commission adopt Resolution No. 2446. A. Finding that the Planned Commercial Development, Case No. PCD 1, will not have a significant effect on the, environment and certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate. B. Approving a Planned Commercial Development District, Case �. No. PCD 1 subject to trie stated conditions and requirements. 12. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CASE NO. GPA N0.5 Applicant: Robert Terrell COMMENTS The City of Lynwood is considering an amendment to the Goals', Objectives and Programs Sections of the' Housing Element of the General Plan Section 6 with respect to State Housing ' Element Revision requirements City-wide. ' RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the j Planning Commission continue this item to the Planning I, t:agenda:JUne9 g � � I � � _ � � Commission meeting of August 11, 1992 to complete 30 day ,! period for EIR addendum circulation and to provide sufficient time for Commission and Community input to the Draft Housing Element Revision. A. Finding that the Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Case No. GPA 5, will not have a significant effect on the environment and certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate. B. Approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Case No. GPA 5 subject to the stated conditions and requirements. 13. ZONE CHANGE CASE NO. ZC4 Applicant: Robert W. Terrell COMMENTS The applicant has filed a request for a zone change (ZC4) from R-1 (Single-Family Residential) zone to R-3 (Multi- Family Residential) zone, and related Conditional Use Permit ' (CUP No. 118) and General Plan Amendment (GPA No. 4) in order to develop 18 Multi-Family dwelling units on a 39,032 square foot vacant parcel on Esther Street and Virginia Avenue in Lynwood, California. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff respectfully requests that the Planning Commission continue this item to the next scheduled Commission meeting in order to provide tima for the applicant to further examine development issues including several easements which occur on the proposed development site. The applicant will return with revisec3 plans for Commission review at the next scheduled Planning Commission meeting. � A. Finding that the Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Case No. ZC4, will not have a significant effect on the environment and certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate. B. Approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Case No. ZC4, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. " 14. DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT REVISION & EIR ADDENDUM COMMENTS Pursuant to City Council direction, Staff is proposing a revision to the Housing Element of the City of Lynwood General Plan in order to bring the Housing Element into conformance with State requirements mandated under Sections 65583 (a), (b) and {c) of the Government Code. The Draft Aousing Element Revision addresses city-wide housing goals, objectives and programs. An initial hearing on the Draft Housing Element Revision is proposed with a 30 day period for circulation of the Draft document and EIR Addendum in order to obtain public comment. Following the circulation period, the Draft Housing Element Revision and EIR Addendum will be presented for a final hearing by City Planning Commission and City Council. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff respectfully requests that the Planning Commission receive the Draft Revised Housing Element and EIR Addendum for review and public comment and that the matter be returned for final review and approval at the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting in August 14, 1992 in order to provide sufficient time to obtain public comment for I incorporation in the Draft document. f:agenda:JUne9 � ' i i 6 � I . � i I � _- i � REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS � None STAFF COMMENTS Report on coin laundry location and development standards. _ Report on proposed definition for "bona-fide" restaurant. Report on Planning Department Budget for conferences. CUP 75, 10133 Long Beach Boulevard. COMMENTS• , PUBLIC ORALS COMMISSION ORALS ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on July 14, 1992 at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall Council Chamber, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California. . l i � f:agendacdune9 � I i � i I ' i 7 i � � I i . !�r'r, ll -� � i , . ��,, 1 T ! /{ �! �. �,;,,,; ;,in �� DATE: June 9, 1992 ' � '��-'- �'�'=�• TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 114 Applicant: Louis and Alice Ross Pr000sal• The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to develop a five (5) story, 100 unit motel, and a one (1) story restaurant at 11550 Long Beach Boulevard, in the C2-A (Medium Commercial) and P-1 (Parking Overlay) zones. The applicant is requesting to continue this item in order to comply with the Planning Division and the Public Works and Engineering Department requirements. On �I May 20, 1992 the applicant submitted a letter to staff requesting ' that this item be continued by the Planning Commission. The � applicant needs time to comply with requirements set forth in a I letter to the Planning Commission dated May 11, 1992 (see ' attachments). This item is continued from the May 12, 1992 � Planning Commission meeting at Staff request. � RECOMMENDED ACTION i Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning � Commission continue this item to permit the applicant time to ; complete plans pursuant to staff recommendations for Planning ; Commission review. ' i I f , i I l i � f:cup:cup174 , I 1 � I �\ , � • �� - �,,: r �1 �� r. , � i'l DATE: � June 9, 1992 ��'��,_I iL�,'1 I �` ��/. , �. TO: � PLANNING COMMISSION CASE i�JO. FROM: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 115 �. Applicant: Mr. Ramon Chavez PROPOSAL• The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop a three (3) bedroom dwelling unit at 10932 Virginia Avenue in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. FACTS: 1. Source of Authoritv Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained for any residential development in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. 2. Property Location: The site is located on the east side of Virginia Avenue and the south side of Los Flores Soulevard and at 10932 Virginia Avenue. (Refer to the attached location map). 3. Prooerty size• The site consist of a irregular shaped lot, approximately 8,480 square feet in size. 4. Existing Land Use: The property is currently developed with a single-family dwelling unit. The surrounding land uses are as follows: North - Commercial-Residential South - Single-Family Residential East - Single-Family Residential West - Single-Family Residential 5. Land Use Designation: The General Plan Designation for the subject property is Town House & Cluster Housing while the Zoning Classification , is R-2. The surrounding land use designations are as follows: General Plan �� Zoning i North - Commercial North - R-1/R-2 � South - Town House & Cluster Housing South - R-2 East - Town House & Cluster Housing East - R-2 � West - Commercial West - R-2 ! i 6. Proiect Characteristics � The applicant proposes to develop a two (2) story dwelling i unit with living room, dining room, kitchen, three (3) bedrooms, and a two (2) car garage on an irregular shaped lot with an existing dwelling. The design calls for a i minimum of 25 percent landscaping. The existing dwelling will be improved, and a two (2) car garage proposed for each ; unit. t:steffrp[:cup115 � � .1 i � � i i � �7. Site Plan Review: On May 28, 1992 the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed development per Planning Commission instructions and recommended approval to the Planning Commission, subject to specific conditions and requirements. 8. Zoninq Enforcement History: . None of record. 9. public Resoonse: None of record at the time this report was prepared. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS 1. Consistencv with General Plan The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning classification (R-2), and the General Plan designation, Town House and Cluster Housing. Therefore, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 115, will not adversely affect the General Plan. 2. Site suitabilitv The subject property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development relative to the proposed density; bulk of the structures; parking; walls, fences; driveways, and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, the subject property is adequately served with the required public utilities and offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility. 3. Comaliance with Develooment Standards The proposed development meets all the development standards � required by the Zoning Ordinance regarding off-street � parking; front, and rear yard setbacks; lot coverage, I height, unit size; and density. 4. Compatibility , i The proposed project will be located in a neighborhood that i is substantially transitioned from single-family to two- i family residences. Located to the north are single-family/ multi-family dwelling. Properties located to the south, � east, and west are developed as single-family/multi-family ' residential respectively. � � 5. Conditions of Aooroval The improvements proposed, subject to the conditions I "recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have � a negative effect on the values of the surrounding � properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, ! safety or welfare. ' I 6. Benefits to Communitv � t The proposed development will enhance the neighborhood and I will act as a catalyst to foster other quality developments. � Moreover, the development will add favorably to the City's i housing stock in conformance with the policies off the Housing Element off the General Plan. i ; f:staffrpt:cup115 ��. i 2 � � � ' - � , � 7. Environmental Assessment The Community Development Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15061 B(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act of 1989 as amended. RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2436: 1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the provision of the State CEqA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3) 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 115 subject to the stated conditions and requirements. Prepared By: Reviewed By: , ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Resolution No.2436 3. Site Plan ; I i I � I i � � ; I ' I I i I i f:s[affrpt:tup175 1 I 3 � � I I LOCATION iVIAP �- \\ ��__ � �- '�,_� N ��CIfY�� -��`\ �� 1 � / � ' � � /_> ,--�( � \� � � , \ ��, j� ��\, � �� , N �� . :� �� 1 � �� % ; - ;,ec a ; � � 1 �� /'., : p \0 9 u � � � \ _ ;I � '' w �, � s � � � � a �\ \\_ // \ \ . /- , •� "„ +� 2 srs9 \ \ — � , e 5 4 p �� \ �\ \ � , •� i � 6 . ' N '�' � �O\9 • � _ O i '� ':\� \ \ � \3'\2 \\ . �' � 4�' 4\O _ � �� eost � \� \ . � 0 4� � . ' 8 _ ; 3 "� \ � \ � y A ya'S \� f A �' i' � � � m � � \\ f ^\ ' 0 , s; � \\\ \\ �e.. ` � � ?' �- A� � ., � e� 4 � � -- \\ . <. � �� • ` �� sj� , � � ` � • . � A � N � f �pL� \\\ . � �m m '., '.: � �w _.L" �$— ,s M. `� _ � �� \ • � d�'P� +" ':'�� O : .. N . ♦ �,: �. __— ' ' � � . "�"m A'� -� � -�, � .. �. I 6 _ �-' � � . a' 4 . � � ='_ , -'� g N -�.. � .'a - 'O �• -� •;sa tl 1 r_�;y�'`* � � \� :� R �.,..,:�� - y � o..... '.. °1 � = � y\ � . � m b+a� �.�. y�.a � > _,_ '--� ' • ^ a �, �� Q .-� ....��m � ��-I�F �� 11 � B , $ ; �. \ � . M1 1 Il 1 .. T ), � w ....o � -�o- R c - R r � � �_� . 0. .� ' \ Y � � N ...,. � _ � _- - .. 9 ,, E _ A ,.. ,,.:, . �n . .- _ 0 cA , —' . • Y � � - m � ' ' . 0 9 '"�- A - o y - - V � �, , y _ , _ �„ ° � a "� . �i ,:... � ' 0�4 -+ 4 °� 10 - � � :�m �-� � ` b ' $ a ` � B AVE e .. ea , , _ \ •.- w t .. .. ,.. . �� R m i �,� ;, ^ �s ' � . —e-� �_ �. � � � N f ,an . \ y N �__, � 8 11..% N; �� . - � I � .,.� ?- . 52 � 4 . _ . �� ' a','.t 'p \ �4 . � . CASE N0. C' � � r � P � RESOLUTION NO. 2436 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 115 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO (2) STORY, THREE (3) BEDROOM DWELLING UNIT AT 10932 VIRGINIA AVENUE IN THE R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Planninq Commission, considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 b(3), as amended; and WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for development in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Official Zoning Ordinance. B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, ; will not have a negative effect on the values of !� surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger i the public, health, safety, or welfare. ( C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current � zoning regulations and site plan submitted and approved i by the Site Plan Review Committee. ; D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not I adversely affect the General Plan. I E. The proposed development will add favorably to the I housing stock and will provide additional affordable ; priced housing in concert with the policies of the j Housing Element of the General Plan. F. The proposed development will aesthetically upgrading � the area and will act as a catalyst in fostering other quality developments. i Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, ' based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby I approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 115, provided the i following conditions are observed and complied with at all times. � i COMMUNITY DEVEIAPMENT DEPARTMENT � 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable � regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform j Building Code and the Fire Code and be in substantial I compliance with plans on file with the Community Development Department. � 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community I Development Department, Planning Division, for review of said Conditional Use Permit. . f:resolutn:reso2436 . 1 '� � '3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. 4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance of any building permits. PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS 5. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving the proposed development. 6. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one hundred and twenty (120) days after the use permitted has been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised. 7. Construction shall commence within (6) months from date of issuance of building permits. 8. Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25&j percent of the lot area. 9. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs combined with ground cover as follows: One (1) five (5) gallon shrub for each 100 square feet of landscaped area; � and two (2) fifteen gallon trees for each 500 square feet of landscaped areas. j l0. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped and shall consist predominately of plant materials except i for necessary walks, drives and fences. � 11. A minimum of two (2) car garages per unit. i 12. A six (6') foot high block all shall be installed along the � perimeter of the property, except within the twenty (20') � foot front yard setback. In this frontage, if built, the I wall shall not exceed a height of four (4') feet measured I from top of curb. i 13. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet. � 14. Final building elevations, including materials of � construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the � Building Official and the Planning Division prior to ' issuance of any building permits. � 15. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer ? shall pay $1.58 per square foot for residential buildings to � the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government i Code Section 53080. � 16. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved. � 17. Acoustical construction materials shall be used throuqhout � the units to mitigate freeway noise to the standards and � satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. f: reso l utn: reso2436 i 2 � � . � 18. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective material including shingles, asphalt composite, architectural shingles, and other similar roofing material that is not . � reflective, glossy, or polished and/or rolled formed type metal roofing. 19. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar material other than the reflective glossy, polished and/or rolled-formed type metal siding. 20. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the street dedications. 21. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the exterior elevation of the building must be approved by the Director of Community Development or his/her designee. 22. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in a consistent manner, including the incorporation within the side and rear building elevations of same or all of the design elements used for the primary (front) facades. 23. That the applicant submit elevation drawings to the Planning Division showing the exterior building design; including the specification of colors, and materials. 24. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturall'y compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent building. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc. shall be installed without the prior written approval of the Director of Community Development. 25. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment, swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical i devices shall be located within the rear yard or street. Such equipment shall be screened from surrounding properties and streets and so operated that they do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring residents, in i accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance. 26. The vacant lot shall be cleaned and maintained in sanitary � condition pending construction and shall be maintained in a � neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure to comply may � result in revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. I 27. A cover sheet of approved conditions must be attached to ' plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety f Division. i 28. Entity will maintain a pro-active approach to the � elimination of graffiti from the structures, fences and an � accessory building, on a daily basis. , 29. For the purpose of providing heating for any dwellin I proposed, only an energy efficient forced air furnace shall i be used, and that the use of any wall furnace shall be expressly prohibited. � i PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT i 30. Provide documentation that lots composing the property were -i legally tied together and legally split lot 187 to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. After � reviewing the documents, the Department of Public Works may require the submission and recordation of a parcel map or � lot merger. ! 31. Submit a copy of property deed or recent title report to the � Department of Public Works. , _ f:resolutn:reso2436 � 1 I I 3 ' i i � � i 32. Submit a drainage plan. Drainage plan will be checked by Department of Public Works. No permits will be issued prior �'' to the approval of drainage plan. 33. Reconstruct damaged and substandard drive approach(es), per City standards. 34. Construct one (1) wheelchair ramp(s) at: southeast corner of Virginia Avenue and Los Flores Boulevard. 35. No access through the rear alley .is allowed. Alley will be vacated in the future. 36. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected separately. Construct laterals as necessary. 37. Install two (2) 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood standards alonq: Virginia Avenue and Los Flores Boulevard. Species to be determined later by department of Public Works. A permit to install the trees is required by the Engineering Division. Exact locations of the tree(s) will be determined at the time the permit is issued. 38. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass. 39. Provide and install one (1) marbelite street pole with light fixture, underground services and conduits along Virginia Avenue. 40. Underground all utilities. i 41. Underground existing utilities if any modifications are � proposed for the electrical service panel. ' 42. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all � off-site improvements. I 43. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The � work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the � Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any � work. FIRE DEPARTMENT � No Comment � I Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall b� delivered j to the applicant. � � APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of June, 1992 by. ' � members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: i AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: f:resolutn:reso2416 � . I 4 , i � I ' " John K. Haynes, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sol Blumenfeld, Acting Director Kenneth Fong Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney I I ; � � � ; f: resolutn: reso2436 . . I i � � � I i � � 5 � � I DATE: June 9, 199Z AGE��DI� ITEM N0 , , T �� pLANN2NG �o�rSSroN CASE IVO. FROM; Kenrick Commu Director SUB,7ECT: Pment Department C onditional APPlicant: Jamese�it Case No. 110 J• Oh Pro osal: The applicant to transfer a re�esting approval an existin Xisting off-sale 5 market t alc h lic c � nd itional Use Permit Martin Luther Kin a new beverages zone, g JY'• Bo UleVdZ�d 6 S foot marketpe�lt from Commiss on arch 10, lgg in the �_2 at 3831 E. meetin � during a regularl � Llght CO mmercial) request. Howeverg� the Plannin Y Scheduled Planning scheduled �°n April g CO14fiission approved t meeting, a request 14 ' 1992 durin his to change his vote in this Was made b g a regularly interest. The vote matter Y a Planning Coaunissioner resulted ln °Yder to avoid a conflict og case was returned to ln a consideration, the tie. On May 12, 1992 Durin Planning C ommission this Planning Commission g this regularl for further error in aPProved this Y Scheduled hearing, the Planning Commission ls� Yefor the May However, due to an quired to rehear public hearinq, the Fa_ c_� this request. 1 • Source of Authorit Ord No. 1306 2 5 - 16-60 �f the Lynwood Munici in order to quires that a Conditional Pal Code continue Use Permit be bt ined or off-site selling alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption in a new establishment. 2 • Pro ert Location The subject property consists of one lot on the northeast corner of E. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard and Bullis Road. (See attached Location Map), 3 • Pro ert Size . The subject property is an irregular lot approximately 302,100 square feet in size. 4 • Existina Land Use The subject site is flat, containing a 47,003 square foot . food market.to be demolish after the construction bf the new market. The surrounding land uses are as follows: North - Residential East - Residential South - Commercial West - Commercial/ Residential 5• Land Use Describtion Gener�lan: Zonina: North- Single Family North- R-1 ' South- Commercial South- C-2 East- Single Family East- R-1 and Cluster Housing t:cup:cup90 � 1 6 ' Pro�ect Character' istics: � The a pplicant � a lcoholic p t t s�. Warehouse b everages ransfer the (Market) . The neWp67m726f s u the pre Fr Sale beverage Aroposed q are foot d W Food APril 14,p 992 t was approved b sfer of f - sale� o f a rehouse Y the Plannin a lcoholic �• Site Plan 5 Commission on Review At its regular Review Commit meetinq on Februar alcoholic tee e valuated t Y Z �� 1992 . Planningn� mfi reco mended a � °ffe alle requireme to specific pprOV to the conditions and $• Zonin Enforcement Histor None of Record. 9 • Public Res onse No written prepared, response on file at the time this report was ANALYS=g pND CONCLUSION: 1• Consistenc with General Plan The proPosed land use Cla ssificatio n ��_2 is consistent with the existing Zoning Uselgnation of Commercialght Commercial and Permit No, Therefore, General Plan Plan. 110 will not adversely gaffectg Conditional the General 2 • Com liance with Develo ment Standards � The proposal does meet the development standards required bY the Zoning Ordinance with res residential land uses. However pect to the use distance to the proPosed CUP needs to be transferred ls existin up°n completion. to the g' and new market 3• Environmental Assessment Staff has found that no substantial environmental im will result from the proposed transfer of use• � Negative Declaration has been filed in the Community Development De � therefore, a partment and in the office of the City clerk. RECOMMENDATION• Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2424: 1• Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 110, will not have a significant effect on the environment , and certifying the negative declaration as adequate. 2 • Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 110, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. Prepared by: Reviewed by: t:cup:cup90 � , , 2 t ATTA-N 1• Location Ma 2• Resolution No. 2424 3 • Site Plan. f;cup:cup90 3 , _,.. .. �OCATION � � � MAP ' �T1W'61L� � y0 I6r�YI � ,,) S1Q '. V'n' . U � � �,�. �"�� -,• �; ��„�,s: i�r . � ' " �, � � � , �, i ' � ' . i0 �� I �ttf�Dy St�� p��:j 11_'�'1 . • 9 �� 1 s �. � � e i;r;,' y'•'�. no'IYtS i. .> > . ��.� � I -r".. � ! a , � � , ,,,��,�•� h � i i0 �-��( , ' x b i, � {in'j1:1..4�:I�p1�.�Ufyt� yl,�� , J ' �. � • !„ � • i .. .k„e�o� ,�.. o YNDOR� . , �' .�� s �N� .�o>> • �L . . ," �.i7�• �. ; � • �i !� ��e•:r'�'� � ••, r � . • 1 _ : _ °.��' j . �.� 5 , d.'i7 � : o' » :.�1� ri�� :` i �u�ii��ufjiNtiil�j n �,.v7 � ie arP �l . �s �� ' i� i i �to af u� d 7 Y�f Su� . . �. � y, Jl Lrr 1 �1,�l� p.�:3�1� i •• �re '' �. ..._•,o>>' rY I3to�'.ltrx �f ly� � � ;: i,cn.f {i �� '— � 1➢ ° � • rJ .. �. � .. : s: °' ,: ..�:. 'L :. .!'i' � y � i o� r--... _. .,�. ��0 io6'O� fi ro a. ,- , � r , , � .�. ,,. 'O . � s=, : v� � � n . oo ,av � ' ' � V '� a• , ii e�.: l�'✓ )S�� '�'tIKV 'O'�'q IOf:OI � i�li � ii �fo � IS ' . � � 11�3 Slri Sj� T� 4 .� � � �17 � '1 l .. . � � V �v.�� ,.��i . 3 l J{v p ]tlr�i : . GiC/TA j � � �� „e�� • . . 4» . ,,, �� F r , ,y�> � SnoE[T • a> > .. ��ee� k u � �'� y'� �� 3�" a �.f ,� . -••� �ocs ' r j t -..., t u� w �, I b i ,�t� � � .� f a a� � •• �• � " ,� � �s « �. �� t�,v. ` ' „ o-� t C �s�'. r. _�_ ». rf .. , p n • - . v v N � i y �j� Y ��,5 � N1� y i `i � . ^ ` . • . �� OJ lI !�O lil , S � � .t yr � � —f , �' . 3J �' o ' r�� r �:� � �. .� f' o h LE SAGf � " I � � e�'.� . ' �7 � . o ,, J � ' '„ � e � I J �!� ,� , ' I p � . . ' ♦ t. � I 3 .�� / ! r . .1 . � � � Li L� M 3y � . , f • j ln C l.� � J S(S }t� fr,�j ai 4 ,; +� 2 • �,J . , i � �u�u�] 'i , J� STRfET i h e ,� • � � � � ,..., , . T u, �r , . � � � �s � � ••, ,�. : r t� �+ � ;� � ': �� , �' ' ` ,; : I 'e , j 0 ` `� � , i . — ,- - .. r- u� i, .� . � , , . ' { ua � , .. ' ,}� ..F n� ''.• i 2 � . . - . "'. � (: ) - � - /'➢ �� r � , o � • • � • t-. � . , ' � p � , - N _.� _ `,� I � , • e' . �� y q I ..�._ Il � I , v++a�.�.�. �• � � � / ��e. trJ � , _�� 1 � � .. ` 7e _ "' '' y y.'' � �. �• ° � � I �.F. ,..!:•; � ^ � � 1 � � • ` ,. „' ! .: ... .p �? ,,, � , . . 1 i � ,� i j� ' �� . Ic ;:�.. C w \�� l , :" .. � � : � ''i J i �� , . � �t ` � �. � a ' •a � M � f� '� J �� ' r �� * � , :�r.; • ,,/ ; �,,, .� ' . ..ti y � 1 . . � � ' ' r�. . ao . . � , � _ � : , � ��•, `1• . . � i. I � r ^ ��I;�III qf uI u I I��` `'. . a� . I J iii i Ii p� jp� f0 : ' e b 1�� i � i . 3 • �,. e �(/( f ' .. �`� �... -vt —r� c 'i=.. _ . 1�.�� i, . . ,. � o P � . ,—,%- -•: ;,+'. •,.�._ t .,�� b . : . �` : + '.� =r - � � u1 n/ ./70 q/ I • � r Q i 4 i .. � t � a�� , a` u� �� rsl iis i��ar i�� ,+' S� ... i� . � i' � ` �. ♦ � . � J . /i�l 1, •i' a � i I `� � /I � � ��. ��.. � .K., •,�,.,; y . .' . _ ,e. ;e; ; . �� •� •i p ��, �, + � ',o. • � .. ,� :. .�.. ,.. s , .CASE = N0. CL�P �.�� , � G � �, �,�, �T� �a . DATE: June 9, 1992 (�',�C'E` ��%!y� ' , W!lta�� IM�1!( TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Director Community Development Department SUB,TECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 116 • Applicant: Mr. Jorge Quirarte PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to development a duplex at 11271 Wright Road, in th R-3 (Multi- Family Residential) zone. FACTS: 1. Source of Authoritv Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained for any residential development in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. 2. Propertv Location: The site is located on the west side of Wright Road and the south side of Beechwood Avenue and at 11271 Wright Road. (refer to the attached location map). 3. Propertv size• The site consists of a regular shaped lot, approximately 11,210 square feet in size. 4. ExistinQ Land Use: The property is currently developed with a single-family dwelling unit. The surrounding land uses are as follows: North - Single-Family Residential South - Multi-Family Residential East - Public School West - Multi-Family Residential 5. Land Use Desianation: The General Plan Designation for the subject property is Town House & Cluster Housing while the Zoning Classification �� is R-2. The surrounding land use designations are as i follows: V General Plan Zoning ; � North - Multi-Family Residential North - R-3 South - Multi-Family Residential South - R-3 � East - Industrial East - M � West - Townhouse & Cluster Housing West - R-2 � - 6. Proiect Characteristics The applicant proposes to develop two (2) attached, two (2) story dwelling units with a living room, dining room, , kitchen, three (3) bedrooms, and a two (2) car garage for each dwelling. The proposal calls for the existing dwelling to be improved with a new two (2) car garage. The design calls for a minimum of 25 percent landscaping and 27 percent ' of the lot area designated for usable open space. f:staffrpt:cup116 . 1 7. Site Plan Review: On May 28, 1992 the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the , proposed development per Planning Commission instructions , and recommended approval to the Planning Commission, subject to specific conditions and requirements. 8. Zoninq Enforcement Historv: None of record. 9. Public ResDOnse: None of record at the time this report was prepared. � ISSUES AND ANALYSZS � 1. Consistencv with General Plan The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning classification (R-3), and the General Plan designation, � Multi-Family Residential. Therefore, granting Conditional � Use Permit No. 116, will not adversely affect the General ; Plan. � 2. Site Suitabilitv The subject property is adequate in size and shape to � accommodate the proposed development relative to the ' proposed density; bulk of the structures; parking; walls, ; fences; driveways, and other development features required by the.Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, the subject property � is adequately served with the required public utilities and offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility. 3. Compliance with Develooment Standards The proposed development meets all the development standards required by the Zoning Ordinance regarding off-street parking; front, and rear yard setbacks; lot coverage, height, unit size; and density. 4. Compatibilitv The proposed project will be located in a neighborhood that is substantially transitioned from single-family to two- family residences. Located to the north are single-family/ multi-family dwelling. Properties located to the south, east, and west are developed as single-family/multi-family residential respectively. I 5. Conditions of Approval I The improvements proposed, subject to the conditions . � recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have ; a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, j safety or welfare. ' 6. Benefits to Communitv i The proposed development will enhance the neighboYhood and ' will act as a catalyst to foster other quality developments. Moreover, the development will add favorably to the City's ; housing stock in conformance with the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. i f:staffrpt:cup176 _ a 7. Environmental Assessment The Community Development Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15061 B(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act of 1989 as amended. I RECOMMENDATION• , Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopts the attached Resolution No. 2436: � 1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt � from the provision of the State CEQA Guidelines as , amended by Section 15061 b(3) i 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 116 subject to ; the stated conditions and requirements. � Prepared By: '� Reviewed By: � ATTACHMENTS i 1. Location Map 2. Resolution No.2437 � 3. Site Plan � � , f:staffrpt:cup116 3 � ,, 1 ,:; a ��d�� oN �sd� o � -�.� a 1 l V. : Z "w �ja : : ° \� o y . �, i�°�i {1 . 1 - :1 �� z� �sar :',` �}- �ia� �S �C�� 1 (�� 1 ! fY'I—� � 1 K �p�N � —� , ;,� ' ��s fa�s onM .'1 � •� d� :;� y1ti : . , , Y ` Q�� _ � �,.... , ,.3' � \, � � • . i � ,. A T � ; �. a e �. �c . <� /x O � � � i R _ 2 ` w 0 c, •••�� : I!'.K 'r� , � � rl iw11 r - .e, ...�� nrr� � +�: n '� �' `n" ff � e�: 3 cn oTfl ' •a" K/ - ��. �ti n ..< I �' C a.c� 9ll n�.� � sx �, — �«--T—� a h S rs' �..� T _�..� a.,� '.° ��,- � xu, a a .u�.. LS� tca.� i t...s�r�w 1 _asssi r �.� - „ .., i , r�i � .:c� n'se e, :, ° � � t11 ~�� . _ !1 ----� ,.—,.- � ,�, .,.•, ovvsr ,•�., � 0 Mn/ OJ 10(11 � ..o.,, d .—�r�— \ � <Ku . L�e� C ___1 u:� � u[•� � I07M1 .,L _ x�_� Y �.'.` ^� a O� a 0 -�''`� , Q�i J � Ox o �J ,::u ,.,��, � �+tll i - -. -- �� — tv � -� „ —�:.--� „^.�. Al/J a t'9�sse „ -'�- ocssr - �- cs. - a S rcon � � «,.. a - ��„ - r. - ii.�. - , osi � ..�„ �____ '�.�..— 11DS1 � � Of/ � _ r :' a�_—__.,_ ifWl ' _ _ j9Vf7 _ 1 _ t9A07 _ . J(' a.�. _�-' ��l J� am+ it:i�ai — 1 — yy — ll�j —_ � :;i;'� ,,., .,� i ,� . a�,,, n� �� k' I L� VPi � — -----�----- ,,,, � v i � o,,,, M svraz � n•n a en ' ' � �g �--..— y� �,.n �— -� i szAl � :a�c .n % � sru� i or e ,..,• :,x : � � �� l� ! r----- b [��— naq f/ �.� �/ :�.n �— — � ..�i �-- i 8 ,—� _ �— � - r ... �/ H�ii 1 h� � •° I OZ�� °I - �.� r � w'. or I� er i r�� • : � i:� `- I : ,-�y i i ' ( _i,q� 1 ° - - - - - e .. �, ��_ p � �,�.. Ti --- _ 1 — _ _ — — -T — J t �-��I �� _ _ —' o � y� _ ..•.il ,, .,,,, y b o ,. �., s. ', ;", � � D� a e, u � � � ..�� `i � ; ..,, ri ., "'" o o ... n �, _'..—' _—�DAr .. 0 5r' o: d�dUV N011�d�O� �i r: �._ . , RESOLUTION NO. 2437 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF_ THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE - PERMIT NO. 116 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2) STORY, THREE (3) BEDROOM DWELLING UNITS AT 11271 WRIGHT ROAD IN THE R-3 (MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and ' WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and � WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CE4A i Guidelines Section 15061 b(3), as amended; and ! WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for �, development in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as follows: ` A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, , landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Official Zoning Ordinance. B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, 1 � will not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public, health, safety, or welfare. C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current zoning regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the Site Plan Review Committee. D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. E. The proposed development will add favorably to the housing stock and will provide additional affordable priced housing in concert with the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. F. The proposed development will anesthetically upgrading � the area and will act as a catalyst in fostering other quality developments. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, ' based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby. �� approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 116, provided the following conditions are observed and complied with at all times. COMMUNITY DEVEIAPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable , regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building Code and the Fire Code and be in substantial , compliance with plans on file with the Community Development Department. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, for review of said Conditional Use Permit. , f:resoWtn:reso2437 � 1 1 I 3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City � � Departments. 4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, , understands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution '� ' prior to issuance of any building permits. ', PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS �� 5. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving ! the proposed development. i 6. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one i hundred and twenty (120) days after the use permitted has I been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised. 7. Construction shall commence within (6) months from date � of issuance of building permits. � I 8. Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25$) percent of the lot area. , 9. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance � with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. i The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs � combined with ground cover as follows: One (1) five (5) � gallon shrub for each 100 square feet of landscaped area; and two (2) fifteen qallon trees for each 500 square feet of landscaped areas. 10. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped and shall consist predominately of plant materials except for necessary walks, drives and fences. 11. A minimum of two (2) car garages per unit. 12. A six (6') foot high block all shall be installed along the perimeter of the property, except within the twenty (20') foot front yard setback. In this frontage, if built, the wall shall not exceed a height of four (4') feet measured from top of curb. 13. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet. 14. Final building elevations, including materials of f construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the I Building Official and the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. 15. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer shall pay $1.58 per square foot for residential buildings to the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government Code Section 53080. �' 16. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved. i 17. Acoustical construction materials shall be used throughout , the units to mitigate freeway noise to the standards and satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. � f:resolutn:resd437 . t 18. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective material 2 i � I � 18. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective material including shingles, asphalt composite, architectural shingles, and other similar roofing material that is not � reflective, glossy, or polished and/or rolled formed type metal roofing. 19. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of ; brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar material other than the reflective glossy, polished and/or I rolled-formed type metal siding. 20. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the street dedications. 21. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the ; exterior elevation of the building must be approved by the ', Director of Community Development or his/her designee. ` 22. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in �, a consistent manner, including the incorporation within the j side and rear building elevations of same or all of the i design elements used for the primary (front) facades. i 23. That the applicant submit elevation drawings to the Planning ' Division showing the exterior building design; including the specification of colors, and materials. � i 24. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally i compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent I building. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc. , shall be installed without the.prior written approval of the '� Director of Community Development. ; i 25. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment, � ', swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical i devices shall be located within the rear yard or street. Such equipment shall be screened from surrounding properties and streets and so operated that they do not disturb the eace uiet and comfort of nei hborin residents, in P � q 9 4 accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance. 26. The vacant lot shall be cleaned and maintained in sanitary condition pending construction and shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure to comply may result in revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. 27. A cover sheet of approved conditions must be attached to plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety Division. � 28. Entity will maintain a pro-active approach to the � elimination of graffiti from the structures, fences and an � accessory building, on a daily basis. � 29. For the purpose of providing heating for any dwelling ' proposed, only an energy efficient forced air furnace shall � be used, and that the use of any.wall furnace shall be I expressly prohibited. , PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT � 30. Provide documentation that lots composing the property were � legally tied together to the satisfaction of the Department � of Public Works. After reviewing the documents, the , i Department of Public Works may require the submission and recordation of a parcel map or lot merger. 31. Site plan is incorrect. Correct the property dimensions and � resubmit. f : resolutn: reso2436 3 i i e 32• Submit a copy of a recent title report to Public Works. the Department of r 33. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered Civil En engineer. Property is located within (EL85.0') loo year flood zone area. Pad elevations shall be 1 foot above flood level zone per flood boundary ma all applicable codes P• Also conform to Code. Building above floodtleve12wi11 req ire�� ubstantial amount of fill, therefore, suggest alternative methods of designs to minimize amount of livable space at ground level. 34. Connect the public sewer. Each building shall be connected separately. Construct laterals as necessary. 35. Regard parkway and landscape with grass. 36. Provide and install one (1) marbelite street pole with light fixtures, underground services and conduits at Wright Road. 37 • Underground all utilities. 38 • A Pe�it from the Engineering Division is required for off- site improvements to be completed by the applicant. 39• All required water meters, meter service chanqes and/or fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any work. FIRE DEPARTMENT ° No Comment Sect� 3, A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of June, 1992 by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: ' NOES: - ABSENT: ABSTAIN: f:resolutn:reso2476 � � 4 ➢ f John K. Haynes , Chairperson A AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM; Sol Blumenfeld, Actin Community Develo g �irector pment Department Deputy Citynp,ttorney - fcr esolutn:reso2436 � � S � ,_ DATE: June 9, 1992 r,n�RVtJ� �TE�! ��. _.--� . � ' TO: PLANNING COMMISSION v��+� , '�O. � FROM: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, DirecCdr Community Development Department "" SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 117 Applicant: Mr. Abraham Ponce PROPOSAL• ,. The applicant i§ requesting approval of a.Conditional Use Permit - to develop a duplex at 11359 Dunoan in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. FACTS: 1. Source of Authoritv Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained for any residential development in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. � 2. Propertv Location: The site is located on the east side of Durican Avenue between Sanborn Avenue and Martin Luther King Blvd. (Refer , to the attached location map). 3. Pronertv size: The site consists of a rectangular shaped lot approximately _ 6,900 square feet. _ 4. Existincr Land Use: � • The property is currently vacant. The surrounding land uses are as follows: North - Two-Family Residential " South - Single-Family Residential East - Single-Family Residential West - Single-Family Residential 5. Land Use Desianation: - The General P1an Designation for the subject property is ` Town House & Cluster Housing while the Zoning Classification is R-2. The surrounding land use designations are as follows: General Plan Zoning North - Town House & Cluster Housing North - R-2 South - Town House & Cluster Housing South - R-2 � East - Town House & Cluster Housing East - R-2 West - Town House & Cluster Housing West - R-2 - . � � f: planning\staffrpt\cup117 � � � � 1 ,- 6. Project Characteristics: The applicant proposes to develop a duplex with two (2) car - garage per unit. The first floor shall consist of the living room, dininq, kitchen, one half (1/2) bath and laundry area. The second floor include three (3) bedroom and a full bath. Approximately twenty-five (25�) percent of the site is designated for landscaping. ' Staff reviewed and recommen3ed the revisions shown on the attached site plan. Staff recommended a stepped two-story town house design with attached garage. - 7. Site Plan Review: , On May 28, 1992, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and recommended approval to the Planning Commission, subject to specific conditions and requirements. - 8. Zoning Enforcement Historv: " None of record. , 9. Public ResDOnse: None of record at the time this report was prepared. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS 1. Consistency with General Plan The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning classification (R-2) and the General Plan designation Town House and Cluster Housing. Therefore, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 117, will not adversely , affect the General Plan. 2. Site Suitabilitv The subject property.is adequate in size and shape to ,' accommodate the proposed development relative to the , proposed density; bulk of the structures; parking; walls, . fences; driveways, and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, the subject property is adequately served with the required public utilities and offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility. 3. Compliance with Develonment Standards The proposed development meets all the development standards required by the Zoning Ordinance regardinq off-street parking; front, and rear yard setbacks; lot coverage, height, unit size; and density. . 4. Comoatibility � The proposed project will be located in a neighborhood that is substantially transitioned from single-family to two- family residences. Properties located to the south, east, are developed as Two-Family Residential respectively, and to the west is developed as single family residential. 5. Conditions of Approval The improvements proposed, subject to the conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. � f:staffrpt\cup117 . 2 � 6. Benefits to Communitv The proposed development will enhance the neighborhood and will act as a catalyst to foster other quality developments. Moreover, the development will add favorably to the City's housing stock in furtherance of the policies off the Housing Element off the General Plan. 7. Environmental Assessment The Community Development Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15061 B(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act of 1989 as amended. RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopts the attached Resolution No. 2438: 1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the provision of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3) 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 117 subject to the stated conditions and requirements. Prepared By: Reviewed By:. ATTACHMENTS 1. Location Map 2. Resolution No.2438 3. Site Plan � t:staffrpt\cup117 � I � i 3 I ( I I LOCATION f111AP , '� /l1 b M1 +I 1 o i d ° E z i� o „ �.s a o � I ,�.. . __.�-- , _ �: � • „�,:. , :� �U Z `2 tiU�. If iiii ♦ �� o � ' , ��rr � 7 5� \ I . � ^ � + �naf�� / oi »» " y faf �j.�.. !q0/ �IIAfa `�� ,� � , �� .a Ff JANJO?N $ o AVE. $ y /'S- d� ,a..>, "o G'� „ , ..�. P d � :. g !p°tiu o � r� y; rssr''� � tv> > - tltl a� �..w. r` e0 I oo tll.oi o�,., s � � . S o � 17�� 1J :� v � 91/ �wlJC e ,� '.. � fo � w� sa ., ty t 60 R O Pl^ q•., il..q u.i. ^ /^ I e o. i L-�_ , t �� o Z2� zsl � e }(Z JJ'1 � �71�• t �� .. �.. _ � �a�� ..�.� o . R � • n... ... .°,' 0 l(3( �1��. II il�� .... o in. —' — I1�4 R /!! $ !]O TS/ 3!i !6� " �� '� �°. � � i : n��. �� ' o ° �} ,0 � 1� �•�� ISO iiI o !6! � , ° 0 4�,.. ,i � A — � /Q _�_. R � ^ � II i.,, u � n.�. R , R o � � Q Zi1 11lf �s �ur . 1 n . •� $ I R." A--dG1-_ ... n. .. t N __ _ _' � R �,r �;.,. R �u. � � s .� n,.� ,� X u��3 .ir. u,. o iy a $ s0 � Z � 1!! 1I�:' � 1tJ .. 2 i , � �� — — — - ° . ^ V .. II..' � Ilui � � . ._. p3Y! °.� u�90 t� ' �' v„� Q n�,. �� R V ,,Ii1 $ � L3l � !J p .3IJ R- 960 - ` `+�,... � }I :.B IJ II+I� M � - n . ..,. ,�._; � �,... 3 �,.. � ^ � ,. h u�� j n : s I�� 3 L+s �� zsa ue � � p �"� � ,,..• � �,- ��,., � es� � M�„_. � i� �' is o . A�.. ,i„ i.,i n�.� � i � v y � �e� 3 � „_. A, , _LkL $ 1ss 3<! dSd ��,,• �� e� � +:o no �Q / Q /S F . � y � $ n].. o �,.., m .< �..: Ru � ,.e �,l�f • 1� 0 2!I � 'iS0 ,y n•" . � �- I19,. w n .,. ' � 1. � _," . . � y' o �4�3 0 o ir• ' a_^_ - �_ _ _ � - /1 , „ ,. � k � � /i . � I,id „ $ 2t3 ^ _'it/- � iSC : ,•' - - ---- �� i..� .. ... � : ,�,.. ;,.., i � _..__ . �,,.. R �..., �.� ti,=:____ : -- �; ° j ° u � . ze� ° t.: g . esr R 755' a ,� ,'� ,'�° i�° i� i i x'i �� ,,,. ii R��„bia�� 1�03., . i�i; so a;_�!f!. ..ifa? = i ! I �, .� �. ...��r �?i T�ia...aw .,'a s�^n A y ou .wo �=s�s�+� � � �aoi� � 1 .I • I : �: I� il .SHL�Er � '. F � ,:: CENTV?Y � � � i �•.�� r.n JO � �H� � I �, a • � s �c t. , :' e � ,. �: ' ' 6 � = = - a � Y i . i � . '. �r c, ti z .� a�:ss 1:.= ._. -- : ��: � . I . ' 1"00 `14` 15 16 1 7r IB 19i 2C� 21� '22 23 24� 26 27 ?b 29 w 30 31� � . , ... ro . �o . � 1 .o - .o �a . . . .e .. i , ,, .: Q ' __-�"_-' � Q • i " . y� 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42, 43 44 45 46� 47 48 49 50 51 ti ;,� - ; � �, � �styy �a o 5� _ :i -� LUGI � ,. �� + � �v£ Y ' „ ,, ,, n n �a, � , �I ♦ ,' (1Si � l.L � G 6 IJ J) d. I�J itff ' ` IAJI N p ' t11f IJ i) � 1r s.: h .:�D Y sa i+o'r. m ; �n..a m ^ ^�..a� F b n•• icOe �, ' ii,..� �n,,. � ,�....� �..2� ,,.. m o o ipe q � _u . � � ' I . i�<. . � � � ns., & ,.: „ . „> . � � • ' µ i n m ' , �i� O�iY � M i�'r � N , . �• • O , r �, , . � 115:. m 1ar ia�' � ^ � n � Y n I m ,� .,�. m$ o a ��. � o � b � n:.. ` 4 ' r,,,. _. ,n %� �` p� o m ur ,.a. O �� !� o l� p p � I�f� 0 . Qry • . � , : II.S3�0 lC l0 � t �°. � n ♦ 1� . 9D 4 01'n O. v� `� b�lc = , ' n: � c _ c. _ tl.�o y� m ..... . r _' � --- �s� _ �_ _R ' --- • .,o--- � x s,;: � � . + � �o� .�.,00 i - i i . � ,, CASE N0. GJn �i , ;: I �� , – �� . :— -----___ __. _____,_- --_---- , � RESOLUTION NO. 2438 , R ' A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF ' THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE ` PERMIT NO. 117 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DUPLEX AT 11359 DUNCAN AVENUE IN THE R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD, ' CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and •, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Communi£y Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 b(3), as amended• and WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for development in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. Section 1: The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as follows: o A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls,' landscaping, driveways and other development features ,. required by the Official Zoning Ordinance. B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger � the public, health, safety, or welfare. C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current zoning regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the Site Plan Review Committee. ' D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not t adversely affect the General Plan. E. The proposed development will add favorably to the ' • housing stock and will provide additional affordable priced housing in concert with the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. F. The proposed development will aesthetically upgrade the area and will act as a catalyst in fostering other , ,' quality developments. , Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby , approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 117, provided the following conditions are observed and complied with at all times. ° COMM[JNITY'DEVELAPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable - regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the.Uniform Building Code and the Fire Code and be in substantial compliance with plans on file with the Community Development � Department. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures t reported to the Community Development Department, Planning Division,fo Conditional Use Permit. � �f:resolutn:reso2431 „ - ' I ' 3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. 4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a ' Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, ' understands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance of any building permits. . PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS � • 5. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving , the proposed development. 6. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one ,' ' ° hundred and twenty (120) days after the use permitted has been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised. 7. Construction shall commence within (6) months from date of issuance of building permits. 8. Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25�) percent of the lot area. 9. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accbrdance with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the ' Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. • The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs ° combined with ground cover as follows: One (1) five (5) ' gallon shrub for each 100 square feet of landscaped area; , and two (2) fifteen gallon trees for each 500 square feet of landscaped areas. � 10. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped and shall consist predominately of plant materials except , ° for necessary walks, drives and fences. - li. A minimum of four (4) enclosed parking spaces shall be `. provided. ' 12. A six (6') foot high block all shall be installed along the perimeter of the property, except within the twenty (20') foot front yard setback. In this frontage, if built,. the wall shall not exceed a height of four (4'j feet measured from top of curb. 13. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet. 14. Final building, elevations, including materials of , construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the' . Building Official and the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. 15. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer shall pay $1.58 per square foot for residential buildings to _ the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government Code Section 53080. 16. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved. � 17. Acoustical construction materials shall be used throughout the units to mitigate freeway noise to the standards and satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. -� f:resolutn:reso2431 ' � a � 18. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective material including shing2es, asphalt composite, architectural -� shingles, and other similar roofing material that.is not reflective, glossy, or polished and/or rolled formed type metal roofing. ' 19. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar material other than the reflective glossy, polished and/or rolled-formed type metal siding. 20. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the street dedications. ," 21. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the exterior elevation of the building must be approved by the Director of Community Development or his/her designee. 22. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in a consistent manner, including the incorporation within the side and rear building elevations of same or all of the. ' design elements used for the prima2y (front) facades. 23. That the applicant submit elevation drawings to the Planning . Division showing the exterior building design; including the specification of colors, and materials. 24. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent building. In addition, no security fences, gril2s, etc. shall be installed without the prior written approval of the Director of Community Development. ' , 25. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment, - swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical devices shall be located within the rear yard or street. Such equipment shall be screened from surrounding properties and streets and so operated that they do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring residents, in accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance. 26. The vacant lot shall be cleaned and maintained in sanitary condition pending construction and shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure to comply may , result in revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. 27. A cover sheet of approved conditions must be attached to plans prior to submission to the Building and Safety Division. ' 28. Entity will maintain a"pro-active approach to the elimination of graffiti from the structures, fences and an accessory building, on a daily basis. • 29. "For the purpose of providing heating for any dwelling i , proposed, only an energy efficient forced air furnace shall I . be used, and that the use of any wall furnace shall be � expressYy prohibited_ i ' PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 30. Submit a copy of property deed or recent title report to the , Department of Public Works. I � f:resolutn:reso2431 ' ' � � I < � { � � , � 3 � i . I I _ ; � , __ I 31. Submit a grading plan prepared .and signed by a registered ' „ Civil Engineer. Property is located within (EL85') 100 year ' flood zone area. Pad elevations shall be 1 foot above flood ''�. level zone per flood boundary map. Also conform to all applicable codes per Section 12 1/2 of Lynwood Municipal Code. Building above flood level will require substantial amount of fill, therefore, suggest alternative methods of design to minimize amount of livable space at ground level. ' 32. Construct a new drive approach per City standards at Duncan Avenue., 33. No access through the rear alley is allowed. Alley will be ' vacated in future. 34. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected separately. Construct laterals as necessary. 35. Install two (2) 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood , standards along Duncan Avenue. ' 36. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass. 37. Provide and install one (1) marbelite street pole with light : fixtures, underground services and conduits at Duncan Avenue. 38. Underground all utilities. 39. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all off-site improvements. 40. All required water meters,, meter services changes and/or � fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer. , The work shall be performed by a Zicensed contractor hired by the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from ' the Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing. any work. FIRE DEPARTMENT 4T.. If security bars are placed on bedroom windows, at least one '," window for each bedroom shall have quick release mechanisms that does not require a key or any special knowledge. °� U.B.C. Sec. 1204. 42. Provide smoke detectors, (U.L. and State Fire Marshal approve type.) . Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of June, 1992 by � members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: ` AYES: NOES: ` ABSENT: ' - _ ABSTAIN: 4 , - . � John K. Haynes, Chairperson 'APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sol Blumenfeld, Acting Director Kenneth Fong Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney � f:resolutn:reso2431 - � . , � 5 �.rr��t'� ITEM N0. -l�-.� DATE: June 9, 1992 �n�� (�lO r1 i r TO: Planning Commission FROM: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Director Community Development Department SUB,TECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 118 Applicant: Robert W. Terrell Proposal• The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop 18 multi-family units on a lot located on Esther ' Street, west of State Street at Virginia Avenue in the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) zone. Staff request that this case be continued. This request is made to allow the applicant to address issues regarding the site plan that does not accurately indicate property easements, and, other pertinent development information required for reviewing the proposed development. In order to provide time for the applicant to further examine _ development issues including several casements which occur on the proposed development site. The applicant will return with revised plans for commission review at the next scheduled Planning Commission Meeting. Recommendation Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission continue this case to the next scheduled meeting of I July 14, 1992. •' i i i , I i I ; i i � � f:staffrpt:cup118 � ! 1 � DATE: June 9, 1992 AGENDA 1 I tM IVU � TO: PLANNING COMMISSION CASE N 0 . �t . FROM: Kenrick Karefa-johnson, Director Community Development Department � SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT CASE NO. 24. FAMILY DAY CARE ' HOMES STANDARDS IN ALL RESIDENTIAL ZONES. . PROPOSAL• The staff is proposing to amend Chapter 4 and Chapter 25 the. Official Zoning Ordinance with respect to regulating Family Day Care Home Standards in all residential zones. The proposed , amendment will permit large Family Day Care Homes, and limit the . processing fees for Conditional Use Permit to $800.00. BACKGROUND• At the City Council meeting of September 3, 1991, the City Attorney's office was directed to work with staff in the amendment of the City Ordinance for Conditional Use Permits for Child Care Faailities. It was determined at that meeting (City Council) that the City (staff) investigate the potential to reduce or waive the $800 fee for the required Conditional Use Permit. Staff proposes to bring the City Code on Child Care Facilities into compliance with State requirements. • Currently, the most widely used form of out-of-home care is - family day care. This care, as the term implies, is provided in a family home-specifically the provider. Recently, the staff reviewed the laws and regulations.for family day care use in cities for compliance with State Law. It was found that the City ' of Lynwood,s regulations for such use is inconsistent with State Law. The staff is proposing to amend chapters 4 and 25 of the City codes to bring them into compliance with State requirements. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The principle issue with respect to the proposed ordinance is compliance with State laws and regulations regarding family day care home use. The proposed ordinance brings city regulations into compliance by restructuring requirements for '�notice" procedures; the right of appeal to City Council; day care home use compliance with the NOISE ELEMENT of the General Plan; distance requirements; and the number of children in large day care home uses. In addition to the principle issue discussed above, in November, 1990, the Public Counsel, a public interest law firm, raised concerns regarding the City's zoning ordinances for family day care homes. The Public Counsel pointed out that the City's zoning ordinance for the subject use is not in compliance with State law. The proposed ordinance addresses this •° concern as cited above. The Public Counsel, also, raised concerns that small family day care homes (care for one (1) to six (6) children) and large day care homes (care for seven (7) to twelve (12) should be permitted as out right uses in all ' residential zones. The staff evaluated this concern and concluded that current restrictions on family day care homes within the City should be maintained to protect the health, , safety, and welfare of the community. The Public Counsel raised concerns regarding the limit of three (3) children that can be cared for in family day care homes in multi-family dwelling units. An evaluation of this concern found that the ordinance should be changed to allow six (6) childrea that can be cared for im such dwelling units;;and the proposed ; ordinance contains this change. The last issue raised by Public Counsel. is with respect to application process required for approval of family day care providers. The City codes require that applicants for a day care home use providers comply with f:staffrpt:zoa24 1 ,' ;;` provisions of the home occupation permit requirements and Site � Plan Review requirement in order to seek approval for the subject use. The staff evaluated this concern and concluded that these requirements should be maintained in order to protect and preserve the health, safety, and welfare of the community. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The proposed amendment is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended by Section 15061b(3), and the notice of determination has been placed on file in the Community Development Department, and the Office of the City Clerk. RECOMMENDATION• Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2445. 1. Certifying that the project is exempt form the . provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended by Section 15061b (3). 2. Recommend that the City Council approve the findings in Resolution No. 2445, waive the reading, and introduce the proposed ordinance. Prepared by: , Reviewed by: ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. 2445 ` . 2. Proposed Family Day Care Ordinance � f:steffrpt:zoa24 - � �� - 2 . i - � ; ORDINANCE NO.. �� AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CZTY OF " LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 4 AND CHAPTER 25, OF THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE AND . " • ZONING REGULATIONS WITH RESPECT TO REGULATING ,} FAMILY DAY CARE HOME STANDARDS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTZON 1. Chapter 4, Section 4-22 of the Lynwood - Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: . - 4-22 HOME OCCOPATIONS 4-22.1 Scope. The provisions of this section shall govern ' the procedure for obtaining, suspending and revoking a home occupation permit required.by subsection 408h. (Code 1972 & 17-91) 4-22.2 PERMIT APPLICATION. Any person proposing to manage, conduct or carry on any business within the home at any location shall file a written application for a license with the City License Collector on forms prepared and provided the applicant by the License Collector. The applicant shall answer . fully and freely all questions contained in the form on the • application stat'ing fully the type of business to be conducted, the grounds for the application and the facts relied upon. (Code 1972 & 17-92) 4-22.3. Filinq Fee. The filing fee for a home occupation permit shall be as prescribed in subsection 4-8.Sh. (Code 1972 & 17-93) 4-22.4 Notice of Filinq of Application to Surroundinq Property Owners. The License Collector shall mail a notice of a � 'pending home occupation application to the residents or property owners within a radius of one hundred and fifty (150') feet of the location of the proposed business, except that for a family . day care home. the License Collector shall mail a notice of a pendina home occupation aonlication to the residents or oroperty owners within a radius of one hundred (100'l feet of the proposed familv dav care home. The notice, i.e., postcard should state the followinq: _ a. The type of business proposed to be conducted; and the following: b. "Unless written objection is filed at my office within ten (10) calendar days from the date this notice was ` mailed, provided the applicant is otherwise qualified by law and ordinance, I shall issue a home occupation permit to the. applicant." An answer by you on the reply notice i.e., oostcard attached shall state: "2 ** object to the oroposed business, ** ; and I recognize that the receipt of this card within the ten (10) day period � the License Collector's office shall • constitute sufficient notice of objection.° (Code 1972 & 17-94 and H&S Code & 1597.46(al.) SECTION 2. Chapter 4, Section 4-22.5 shall be amended to read as follows• a..22.5 Planninq Commission Hearinq on Application upon objection of Property owners. a. If an objection has been filed in the office of the License Collector pursuant to paragraph b. of subsection ' 4-22.4, the License Collector'shall notify the Secretary of the Planning Commission in writing. The application for a home . 1 ' occupation permit shall then be set for public hearing by the secretary of Planning Commission, the date oP the first of which ;� hearing shall not be less than fifteen (15) days nor more than _ fifty (50) days from the date of the filing of the notice by the Li�ense Collector with the Secretary of the Planning Commission that an objection has been filed. , b. Notice of the time and place of the hearing pursuant to paragraph a. shall be given to the applicant and to the objector by the secretary of the Planning Commission by �. registered or certified mail at least ten (10) days prior to the date set for the hearing. No other or additional notice shall be required unless otherwise directed by the Planning - Commission. - c. The decision of the Planning Commission after a hearing provided in paragraph a. shall be final, exceot that family day care homes shall have the ri�rht to appeal a home occupation oermit denial to the Citv Council. . 3ECTION 3. Chapter 4, Section 4-22.7(g) of the Lynwood � Municipal Code shall be amended to read as follows: 4-22.7 q. No use will be permitted which by'reason of color, design, materials, construction, lighting, signs, sounds, noises or vibrations inconsistent with Noise Element of the General Plan alters the residential character of the premises or which unreasonably disturbs the peace and quite of any neighbor.' SECTION 4. Chapter 4, Section 4-22,.7(1) is added to the Lynwood Municipal Code to read as follows: 4-22.7 1. Sections 4-44.7(b),(c),(f) and (h) shall not be applicable to Family Day Care Homes. SECTION 5. Chapter 25, Section 25-4.2 C.12 of the Lynwood Zoning code sha21 be amended to read as follows: ' Zones R-1 R-2 R-3 12. Large family day care homes. P P P - Large family day care homes shall � be allowed in all residential zones as accessory uses provided that: � � (a) The use comolies with the home occu�ation orovisions"of Section 4-22. et sea., of the Lvnwood Municioal Code, exceot that emblovees shall be allowed, if required bv State law for the ave of children cared for; and the use mav occuov more than four hundred (400) square feet of floor space. (b) The annlicant shall take steos to mitiaate anv � adverse effect on the neiahborhood due to oedestrian or vehicular traffic, such as staggering children's drop-off. maintainina driveways unobstructed, and turning off idle enqines. , (c) No other day care use is located in a residential zone within three hundred (300) feet of the proposed location, ' unless such other dav care use is located across a freewav or ,, major hiqhway from the proposed use. (d) The nroposed location has control of the off-site , Aarkina for employees, without widenina the drivewav or in any other wav naving in the front vard: and adeQUate off-street �kinct soaces shall be provided in sufficient number of nrevent adverse effects uoon the neighborhood. (e) The apolicant is duly licensed by the State of � California to conduct this use 2 (f) No advertisina or sians shall be displaved on the „ oremises. , . � 88CTION 6. Chapter 25, Section 25-4.2 C.13 of the Lynwood Municipal code shall.be amended to read as follows: 13. In the multiple-family dwelling units, a maximum of six j� children shall be permitted, including children under ten 10 years of age who reside on the premises. SECTION 7. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this• ordinance, of the application thereof, to any person or place, r -, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the , decision of any court or competent jurisdiction, such decision • shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, . clause, phase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, ' phrases or portions or the application thereof to any person or . place, be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 8. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to certify to the passage of this ordinance and to cause the . same to be published in the Lynwood Press, a newspaper of ' general circulation printed, published, and circulated in the' City of Lynwood. - INTRODUCED this day of , 1992. , PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of ,1992. , IAUIS HEZNE, Mayor City of Lynwood ATTEST: , ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk City of Lynwood � STATE OF CALIFORNIA } } ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) I, ANDREA HOOPER, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ORDINANCE No. was duly passed and adopted by the said City Council, approved and siqned by the mayor of said City, and attested by the City Clerk of said City, all at a regular meeting of the ' said Council held on the day of , 1992 and ' that the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote: � AYES: NOES: ABSENT: NOT VOTING: 3 1 Witness my hand and the seal of said City the day of , 1992. `i . . (seal) Andrea Hooper, City Clerk City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO FORM: Henry S. Barbosa City Attorney APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Sol Blumenfeld, Acting Director Community Development Department I „ � � i � � ! I i I � i l i I f:ordinance:ordra � 4 i � AGE��UA IT� 1 Nb. f '� DATE: June 9, 1992 CASE N0 . TO: Planning Commission FROM: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: ProAOSed Planned Commercial Development District-PCD No. 1 Designation is Proposed For Property Located In Redevelopment Project Area A and Bounded By Abbott Road in the North, Imperial Highway in the South, Atlantic Avenue in the East, and Zrregularly in the West Encompassing Approximately 10.2 Acres and Described on the Attached Map. Pr000sal• The Lynwood Redevelopment Agency is requesting that the City Planning Commission designate property located in Redevelopment Project Area A a Planned Commercial Development District pursuant to Section 25-34 of the Lynwood Municipal Code. The subject property is bounded by Abbott Road in the North, Imperial Highway in the South, Atlantic Avenue in the East, and irregularly in the west encompassing approximately 10.2 acres. A portion of the subject property has recently been granted a Conditional Use Permit for the development of "Central Appliance," a 77,000 square feet of retail facility, at the intersection of Atlantic Avenue and Pendleton Avenue. The developer of Central Appliance is now interested in enlarging the scope of development to include properties to the South. The recent vacancy of the Lucky Supermarket site located across from the proposed Central Appliance site to the North has provided the opportunity to master plan the future development of a two block area of the City to facilitate concurrent development of the Central Appliance and former Lucky Supermarket sites and other properties fronting on Atlantic Avenue encompassing approximately 10.2 acres. The proposed Planned Commercial Development designation for the subject properties will facilitate the redevelopment of property, replace obsolete retail uses and enhance a highly visible portion the commercial corridor along Atlantic Avenue while generating additional sales tax and tax increment revenues for the City. Facts ' 1. Source of Authoritv Section 25-34 of the Lynwood Municipal Code - PCD - Planned Commercial Development - provides for the development or redevelopment of parcels of land as a coordinated project involving mixtures of commercial uses, community facilities, both public and private. The PCD District is further I intended to provide a comprehensive planning framework while '� ensuring compliance with the General Plan. 2. ProAertv Location � The project is located in Redevelopment Project Area A � ' bounded by Abbott Road in the North, Imperial Highway in the ' South, Atlantic Avenue in the East, and irregularly in the West. (See Attached Map). ' 3. Propertv Size i The subject site is irregularly shaped and comprises ! approximately 10.2 acres. , . 1 I 4. Existina Land Use The subject properties are comprised of several vacant or obsolete retail uses. The Proposed Central Appliance site is occupied by an obsolete variety store retail use. An auto parts store, surface parking, a welding school and a strip center are located immediately to the south of the proposed Central Appliance site. The former Lucky Supermarket is comprised of an obsolete 34,000 square foot structure and surface parking located to the rear of the property. These commercial structures would eventually be demolished and redeveloped. The surrounding land uses are as follows: North - Commercial Multi-Family East - Commercial South - Commercial West - Single-Family School , 5. Land Use Descrintion General Plan: Zonina: North - Commercial/Townhouse North - C-3 Heavy Cluster Housing ' Commercial East - Commercial South - C-3 Commercial West - Single-Family West - R-1 Single-Family Residential ' 6. Proiect Characteristics: On February 11, 1992, the City Planning Commission granted West Coast Private Equity Partners a Conditional Use Permit (CUP 105) to develop and operate a 77,000 square foot retail store at the southwest intersection of Pendleton Avenue and „ Atlantic Avenue. West Coast Equity Partners is considering the acquisition of adjacent property to satisfy parking and development requirements and is considering the expansion of - original development plans to include properties to the ' south of the original development site. Concurrent with the development of Central Appliance, Staff has met with developers interested in the acquisition of the former Lucky Supermarket site for the development of a variety of retail uses including a 20,000 square foot specialty market, 30,000 square feet of specialty retail uses and a restaurant facility. The proximity of the . proposed projects and their strategic location in the City, present an unusual oppbrtunity to master plan up to 10.2 • acres of development to achieve an optimal redevelopment of the subject properties. The Planned Commercial Development designation of the. subject properties as prescribed in Section 25-34 of the Lynwood Municipal Code will permit a master planned development to facilitate planning for project parking, site ingress and egress, coordinated off-site improvements and the,provision of a common area design treatment to create an attractive, and efficient retail development. 7. Site Plan Review At its regular meeting on May 26, 1992 the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and recommended ° approval to the Planning Commission. 8. Zoninq Enforcement Historv None on Record at Time of Report. 2 x 9. Public Resnonse None of Record at Time of Report. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: 1. Consistencv with General Plan The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning classification of C-3 Heavy Commercial and General Plan � ,, designation of Commercial. Therefore establishing the' Planned Commercial Development designation will not adversely affect the General Plan, 2. Site Suitabilitv The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development relative to structures, parking, ' landscaping, and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Compatibilitv The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of commercial and residential developments; therefore, the. project will be compatible with the surrounding land uses. Residential uses are located to the north and west of the proposed use. 4. Comnliance with Develovment Standards The proposal will ensure development in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance with respect to parking, setbacks, lot coverage, building height and density. 5. Conditions of Approval The proposed PCD District will be subject to the conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, Planning Commission and City Council upon submittal of a comprehensive plan for development and will therefore not have a negative effect upon the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety, or welfare. 6. Benefits to Communitv The proposal will assist in upgrading the commercial use of the subject properties and support the commercial intent of the General Plan. 7. Environmental Assessment Staff has found that no substantial environmental impact will result from the proposed development; therefore, a negative declaration has been filed in the Community Development Department and in the office of the City Clerk. RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution 2443. 1. Finding that the Planned Commercial Development designation for the subject property will not have a . significant effect on the environment and certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate, 2. Recommend that the City Council approved the findings in Resolution 2443 and adopt the proposed resolution. 3 Prepared By: Reviewed By: y ATTACI-IMENTS : 1. Location Map 2. Site Map 3. Resolution � � f:staffrpt:PCD . 4 LOCATION MAP - ,- . .. ,... , � ', � � j�� 0 i0U �d , i �• �• � •••n• • J �- , � . U N / /6 O /a /9 /l l2 /J /I 9 ZO r b i /6 /7 i l9 � 2 � g �' Q / % ^ � � �, � t� ` . � �J = a at J�7 . t � � " � ! Z � M / 4 ' r� � � ` � � "^� o S � � " .. i�i ^� w b �. ', *y r w . o a 8 o g g o g ROAD ° � N 3 � � . fS u.! J n 9l)S 9[l3 7I - � ' . ' � /.• p I Yl�Y � �'910 7/. Y1�'� « yqil„ �� . v� ' 4� ie�' : o S 1 21 � + ' ( � '� a W . S � � � )�� I � ' . I Iy � � � �� v o�� :1.�>-.p; 4P�f `_ Q y � $ h ? s i »n .0 �- 4 C��`a/v qlv. � I G � e Z . ' � r. . dO - r� � . ti V . I � �O b � • � IYS SO yyy � . h � � �.rs � � IiD1W Y y�j � �^d I w s JI O' a �b . p I / ; � � y . J 5 n ��7 �� ,y �9� NfO� 2 L � � o � y '� i J � I / � ST. � .: • ' 3 e a �� oau � ��fntt e 0 � I � � � ; o iz � � v I r � " � �u � a v � Tfi ' r om 1 `� ry ��'�W� � I` J . I � lV � i '� � �oF4146• -- �� V � . 3 �y . � /0 —� � � I I �t Q o �e I �I� iaP !♦p a y3 . I I ' � ` � i L O � „ �r O � 11 � P ' 1 T l � ' m � . (�� M�� `jr yfr sp a� ° 4 r ' o YH '' Yfub �i .�o � � � I . PENOLE ON AVE. . . .✓ /7 � R. � A �� • � * . - �—. Y . `J � � �—. .. �'`. I � I .. i .Y . �j a501p lQ�00. ' fJ�O', 30 fON OO '��/� � s� • ��US t0 � ` n y7�Y YSYD i Hjf 30 • - ,� � ' �i� � i 4id 4I ��)°� n '1 � rore iun9 ` . z ' ro �\ 4 , 30 �� o; a� y o ,: _ o � � �ax : o,�i ,�o3aa �I ^ �I � � �ore> �tR: ! 3 � i8 ti/�� SJ •; i � : � �o,a� r;3a ° � ` st�_sa.� W ',o�, . . �� . 2 , � - ' RP � � • t , 5 ' / 6qY/ • , �u�Y1 .,� � � p :"ze(d1 h I � � : d" �rs is � O r at pt� ve 1�6 Si .i$55� I � I �— 0 3 8 �a� 8 �!� i S ' � '� a ; �' '� 9COC B BLOCK C T �� • o �� . jl � i ,A ia � i � I I � rocec ,�ro5�9�: �a3 s r , � -` � ° � , oy,i v y I a �p i C' f � J '�' , � V� n / � ' � Q} ��%2� 10�87. �"� !y • �C �p55Y`�f'�'� '$ �� h, �v n i �� Sa ��1 , W. I�S�p ` I tia�i ti��S�d.i�331 ya9S i d3a3'` ; L __� � • '� is.ro .m e n» _ _ _ :� i rI � i � H/GHWAY °^. � N '� - 9 -�n d . ., �� } . �. , `Y. P' �.� y p � u it � . _. ' '. oto t� !�, •' �y��Of ' �b. y �� f1� �iero : � p • s. , • 1 , � f . . J f ; ' I 6 S �r .7 � � h • g ' s .2• �'j° 1.r � � � . � � /t I/ IO 9^ �7 o r 4 y ti t � . , ; . ; ' a i �° . ? i ? ' �_ , ' l „� u i .� r • �n .]. � , . ,.. ' : , ' .., � � � a "" er.o,v ° � J * i 1J � .1? H X� /9n ,y ° /p /Q � / /s�..,' e . _... v 7 . 6 9 ts � 5 gLVO. w J . � - � �•s` T o- T. ?� .uv ' a , o e�' � oiy � ,.r� � � . . . � , � ✓ .. - � — N— � � LOS . FLORES ,,. O � ,� (� P °�� l • � �es � � � ' �r . �+a.N � . ' " � I � • �4 . e �" �' i�ar ; 'i � � e� ��'�'s P� i !O�• � /O (/076 ✓^ .' � V jl9�6' � l�• /BO j • ; ,>�o �_. � n��y l a � 'tg3c . , ,� ,, e � ��, -L 5 r � u • �w ._ � � 8 noJP noa '�� QPa ' /iey/ ' �SQYo � � " . �. -�. //n>r.r /in.. � . . . Jc./< i'.ioa' v v 1 ;. � , . , � 1 � CASE N0. , P� n i ; , � � Attachment O pr � � ' � z �s � p ��' �_" , � � _ , � . , _ , o n � , ��;. � � � � '�`� � y O � t � � y a a . . , � � � a ± i �� S , . . O D � i '" .. . ti f, T a � 1 � i� • � . � � � . J � ! t Rnln� __ ' 7 `_J ,J. �� O v � _ � ` ,,,,, � � — —_ .t , _��'�/ �� /// � t � ' O L �� LJ q � I � � / y � � � � ` t ' S�� % � M . �� r / � � i �j� ' � � � . � , Y,`,4 / M1� �' • �"O� �� I '�� ;; + �: X; _ l // �' � �1 ��' ��- ,r�., / � r � �— r�, 1 1 / rd a a „` �" ., tp � � .�� _ � �� .,�iy, ITI , , . �� Jc o � x o � �r� � � � ,��_.. ��:u��,;,��.�� .—;! ��1�� ll%i�� p =�' � � � 1� 1l � ��I� �. : � � � J �_ � �r,; . .,,, - ,� I i �' -��- g o � " ' � �•� ` -- m � � I l _ � _�I1C ..., ;�ll�� ' �. r� � ��l��f `. �� ,. �,�� —.� ,� ��,f��, � _ , �� l�l�ll�Il' � _ — �� — � � � m„� ,.:r... r ,r` / :.�1�) �� -- I � fn �.. 4 ,� Mi ��f Ih� �. _ � :r C ,.u f �l � f � ' ' �- „ [o,,,,�1_ : J I ' ' , � , / � � �� i . ' �. '� r/ " �� -� �., ' 1 , m 7�0 ,1L�•, , . Lti J i O � s� ,.�_,.�� .. � � . , �, — �..��, �� z � �� K : Ir��`�� ] �' �' `� � � � r ' �\ � 8 �� I� � li �/��o_ j� •�/�� I��T '� � . �� m I 1 � �/ Il � �n� � � _ )� `.. _' � m � -IL ,- ��. �il . i � � 1 %� 1 a'�� - � n � ��\ � ,,,,. . ,., �� ,4� � � � o � /'� � 1 .�- ��' � � �-- _ __' �` "' N ,m„. �•.. C � , _ � =�- �, .. °\ , �� .. J ��:. �..�-�- � � � �' , r� . • _ ________ —� /w � . . �. � � .:� - ! ,��"; `:i ' ".i `� - - � .i • i � : ! •. `; �• -' . .�1. J - j � : ' ::� � � • � - � , �a,.,..... '- . - :-�'"' `"i" i . � S �. '� _= �� _ f= � f ., � ". ��. : 7., . . ::n � � ` � : . .,,� :ti.- ' . . . . � . � �c t. • _ � ` � l l■ , � � _ � � ' .. -� � _ _ �,.° 7 i . J��., � ' �. -;r. F _ '•t� ;: f ;� _�i�� ' _' � " � �i Y7-� �` � - � �� T�� j ..''s�` '".w' - ....:... - : . � _ - . = L i s' - � _. � _ _ -� .. �_; . ; . :..;p'. ;_ � �� _ q ' , ;' / : l! � .. ' ' _ E ,�� f ; � �( . -� . a: ' �.• �< ' 3 " � � � • � :C- , .T ` .. . • ��- c � .,-v� �..�':'a��^ - i i �` _ � _ ' _—!=@x� ..ji��:i� i� =; iz; , , .. - :��: � � .�,. . .. ; �. '-:__��. 5 �f�� ) r::�.��____ �' --f' :I� ._ : _ ,. � _"� ,`d � •-�, , i >. : , . ::: ,�r- __ � _ _ � J��; r1 .. _�` ,:. : —�'13�1 .; C � _? `� J t • -�yl��. - � � 'ba:} -,. i � f ` � .,:�.t��-:� �� - ,_` ,.�� . � �: � i�°" ' ` '- ;F i . !i - . � . � ;� .�'ti � � _ 1 �.� { f � �::' � � i'.: Y �� ,�` � '> i.�- .:�, • � � ' � • ' • • �L : � ..- �c•..:- � - _.� � ; — �__ r - '�`i �' - �• � _ _--:.....�j Yt� , ;� .... ' ��ii.�" �,1� F, • . =�%• _ -`� } �• `t�. ' �i` - f.:�. �:�� -�; �., .,, sy• . �� e ":' '� -� � �� ;.- ••. ..::: +' . �� .1�: i�. .. � � ��'"= I i '? .� -._�_ t`:a iQa+ '' � j� '+ � 1 •� ----..._ ��.: :.' . ♦ ,s'�_ _ _ �t•� :� :�' ; ... __� !� ` . =- :�:.r_� s� ` : e�' � - �?' .►��;; }�_�. . i ' •: :�.� � -� • �• •� � 1 �. �� -• • �, - ��• � 1 •.1 :1 •, - �' ��1 �, - 111 1 �. r � �: .1 , 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2443 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION THE CITY OF LYNWOOD RECOMMENDING THE DESIGNATION OF A PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED IN REDEVELOPMENT ' PROJECT AREA A AND BOUNDED BY ABBOTT ROAD IN THE NORTH, IMPERIAL HIGHWAY IN THE SOUTH, ATLANTIC AVENUE IN THE EAST, AND IRREGULARLY IN THE WEST, ENCOMPASSING APPROXIMATELY 10.2 ACRES IN THE C-3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL) ZONE. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, , conducted a public hearing on the subject designation; and WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal will not have a negative effect on the , environment and has therefore declared a Negative Declaration for the project; and WHEREAS, the Planned Commercial Development District designation of the subject properties will facilitate the , redevelopment of property, replace obsolete retail uses and " enhance a highly visible portion of the commercial corridor along Atlantic Avenue, and WHEREAS, concurrent development of the subject properties offers the opportunity to master plan two blocks of commercial frontage along Atlantic Avenue commensurate with the Goals and Objectives of the City's General Plan, Section 1. The Lynwood Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as follows: • A. The proposed PCD designation�of the subject properties will facilitate redevelopment of a major portion of the, : 'Atlantic Avenue commercial corridor. B. The proposed PCD designation of the subject properties will facilitate master planning of a two block area of the City to enhance area parking space, site ingress and egress, coordinate off-site improvements and the provision of common area design treatment. _ C. The principles incorporated in the devel or redevelopment plan contain certain unique features of amenities which could not otherwise be achieved under the other land use districts. D. The PCD designation and resulting development will not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding . properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. E. The Planned Commercial Development District designation' . is required in order to provide additional amenities in the development which compensate for any deviations that may be required and which will act as a catalyst , in fostering other adjacent quality commercial • developments. . f:resolutn:reso2443 � 1 , , '` Section 2. The Lynwood Planning Commission based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations hereby recommends approval of the Planned Commercial Development District (PCD) No. 1 subject to the conditions established by the Site Plan Review Committee, Planning Commission and City Council upon review and approval of a PCD master plan for the subject site. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 1992 by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: John K. Haynes, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: : Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Director Kenneth T. Fong Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney . f:resolutn:reso2443 � . Z 'FIVDA ITE N0. � . �� DATE: June 9, 1992 GASE N0 . TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment - Case No. 5 Applicant: Robert W. Terrell PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Lynwood General Plan Map (GPA No. 5) from Single Family Residential to Multi- Family Residential in order to be considered for a proposal to develop 18 units on vacant lots located on Esther Street west of State Street at Virginia Avenue. Staff request that this item be continue in order to provide time for the applicant to further examine development issues including several casements which occur. , RECOMMENDATION � Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission continue this item to permit the applicant time to complete plans pursuant to staff recommendations for Planning Commission review. planning/art/plan-act/zoa/gpeSsr 1 ,� "' ::`�; DA ITEM N0. `� _ C�SE N0. ?�G � -,� DATE: June 9., 1992 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Director Community Development Department SUHJECT: Zone ChanQe - Case No. 4 Applicant: Robert W. Terrell PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting Zone Change - Case No. 4(ZC 4) from R-1 (Single Family Residential) 2one to R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone, in order to develop 18 Multi-Family units on vacant lots located on Esther Street west of State Street.at Virginia Avenue. Staff requests that this item be continued in order to provide time for the applicant to further examine development site. The applicant will return with revised plans for Commission review at the next scheduled Planning Commission Meeting. RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission continue this item to permit the applicant time to complete plans pursuant to staff recommendations for Planning Commission review. F:art/plan-act/zoa/zc4sr 1 DATE: June 9, 1992 r��.`� ^ �!pA ITEM N0 . � TO: Planning Commission CASE NO �• FROM: Sol Blumenfeld, Acting Director . � Community Development Department SUBJECT: Draft Housina Element Revision & EIR Addendum Pr000sal: Pursuant to City Council direction, Staff is proposing a revision to the Housing Element of the City of Lynwood General Plan in order to bring the Housing Element into conformance with State requirements mandated under Sections 65583 (a),!b) and (c) of the Government Code. The Draft Housing Element Revision addresses city-wide housing goals, objectives �and programs. An initial hearing on the Draft Housing Element Revision is proposed with a 30 day period for circulation of the Draft document and EIR Addendum in order to obtain public comment. Following the circulation period, the Draft Housing Element Revision and EIR Addendum will be presented for a final hearing by City Planning Commission and City Council. Source of Authoritv: Section 65586 of the Government Code requires that local governments conform their housing elements to the provisions of State Housing Element guidelines pursuant to State review. Backqround: On May 23, 1990 the S.tate Department of Housing & Community Development Housing Policy Development Division reviewed the City of Lynwood Drafc Housing Element. Several areas of concern were.identified in the original Draft document including: • Housing Needs Resources & Constraints of Special Groups • Land & Housing Availability for Housing Needs for All Economic Segments of the Community • Financing Availability for Affordable Housing • Quantified Housing Objectives Relative to Housing Needs • Programs to Meet the City's Housing Objectives • Role of the Redevelopment Agency in Meeting the City's Housing Objectives According to the State, these concerns have not been adequately addressed in the Housing Element of the General Plan. On Februaiy 10, 1992 the City of Lynwood, entered in to an agreement to participate in the State's Home Investment Partnership Program (Home) in order to obtain up to $750,000 of State funds for housing new construction and rehabilitation. As part of the agreement, the State Department of Housing & Community Development indicated that the State would transfer funds provided under the HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME> contingent on the City having an adopted housing element in compliance with State law and pursuant to the May 23, 1990 review. The agreement contained a date for submission and approval of the Draf� Revised Housing Element. Pursuant to the agreement and State law, the Draft Revised Housing Element and accompanying EIR Addendum are beine, presented for initial Planning Commission and community comment. � A copy of the Draft Housing Element Revision and accompanying EIR Addendum are on file at the Community Development Department. n tion: Recomme da , Staff respectfully requests that the Planning Commission receive the 1 , Draft Revised Housing Element and EIR Addendum for review and public comment and that the matter be returned for final review and approval at the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting in August in � order to provide sufficient time to obtain public comment for ; incorporation in the Draft document. Attachments: City of Lynwood General Plan Draft Revised Housing Element a:�housinga�sb ,