HomeMy Public PortalAboutA 1988-08-09 PLANNING COMMISSION , �'�� . . . �q_./� // /� �/��l.�� _
�'' � ' /O A/��C. �� / � �
/ ' � ! 'J e:;•
�
�
' � .' . ......,,., . -.. . _ � � ..,,
A G E N D A•
� RECEIUED
CITY OF LYNVVOOD I =
LYN�400D CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CITY CLERKS OfFICE
REGULAR MEETING - 7:30 P. AUG 05 1988
City Hall Council Chambers AM P�
11330 sulTis Road, Lynwood, cA. 7ig�9il0illi12i1i2i3�4i5i6
, � :
� ��� �
�� � 4
. o , , ��`' -
August 9, 1988 �5��,��A� -
C O M M I S S I O N E R S:
Donald D. Dove
Chairperson
Lena Cole-Dennis Alberto Montoya Penalber �
Commissioner Vice-Chairperson ,
Joha K. Haynes Roy Pryor
Commissioner Commissioner
Lucille Kanka David J. Willis, Jr.
- Commissioner Commissioner _
,
�
S T A F F: -
Director of Communitv Development Department Planners w•
f�Y
Vicente L. Mas • Dorethea Tilford �
� Acting Seriior Planner
Commission Counsel Arthur Barfield
Planning Technician
Henry S. Barbosa
Andrew Bengali-Pessima �=
_, Douglas D. Barnes Planning Technician `='<
C'
�=
� t::'
V10:Agencovr �
s
� a
August 9, 1988
OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Call meeting to order.
B. Flag Salute.
, C. Roll Call.
D. Certification of Agenda posting
E. Approval of Minutes of June 14 and July 12, 1988
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
.1. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88012
3532 Los Flores Blvd. (Herbert Thomas)
Comments•
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to
build four (4) apartments at the subject address in the
R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone. This matter was
continued from the July 12, 1988 Planning Commission
meeting, after hearing testimony from the applicant.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planninq Commission adopt Resolution No. 2182: '
a. Finding that Conditional Use Permit No. 88012 will not
kiave a significant effect on the environment, and
certify the Negative Declaration as adequate.
b., Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 88012, subject to
the stated conditions and requirements.
2. Conditional Use Permit No. 88023
3630.Imperial Highway (St. Francis Medical Center)
Comments •
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to
build two (2) medical facilities at the subject address •
in the H-M-D (Hospital-Medical-Dental) zone. This matter
was continued from the July 12, 1988 meeting, in order
that .the applicant would have sufficient time to respond
to the conditions imposed.
Recommended Action
Staff respectfully request that this case be continued
to September 13, 1988, in order to allow staff to
complete the review of conditions imposed and reach an
_ agreement with the applicant.
V11A:Agenda
1
,
3. General Plan Amendment -Case No. 88030
. 11539, 11615 Lewis Street and 3519 Louise Street
' (Louis Ross)
Comments•
The .applicant is requesting a General Plan' Amendment to
redesignate two (2) parcels from Single-Family Residential
and Multi-Family Residential to commercial to construct a
' convenience store/market.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the
Planninq Commission continue General Plan Amendment No.
88030 to the next segu3ar meeting of the Planning Commission
on September 13, 1988.
3a. Zone Chancxe =Case No. 88030
11539, 11615 Lewis Street and 3519 Louise Street
(Louis Ross)
Comments:
The applicant is requesting a Zone Change to reclassify two
(2) parcels from R-1 (Single-Family Residential) and R-3
- (Multi-family Residential) to C-2A (Medium Commercial) to
construct a convenience store/market.
Recommended Action: '
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the
Planning Commission continue Zone Change No. 88030 to its
next regular meeting on September 13, 1988.
4. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88042
11230 Louise Avenue (Jose Rodriguez/Sergio Lopez)
Comments• '
, i
The applicant_is requestinq a Conditional Use Permit• to
build four (4) apartments at the rear of an existing single�
family dwelling in the R-3 (Multiple-family Residential)
zone. This matter was continued from July 12, 1988.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2202:
a. Finding that Conditional Use Permit No. 88042 will
not cause any significant environmental impacts;
and certify the Negative Declaration as adequate. .
b. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 88042, subject
to stated conditions and requirements. '
V11A:Agenda -
` 2
i
i
. <
e
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS
l
5. Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 88044 `•
_ ;
2975-2977 Fernwood Avenue (Gary Harre) �
Comments•
This is an application for Tentative Parcel�Map approval in
order to merge six lots into two parcels.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2205:
� a. Finding that Tentative Parcel Map No. 19788, Case No.
' 88044 is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines, as amended.
. b. Approving Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 88044, subject
to stated conditions and requirements.
" 6. .Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88047
11218 Louise Avenue (Usbaldo Olivas)
_ Comments•
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to
build five (5) apartments at subject address in the R-3
(Multiple-Family Residential) zone. The property is
developed with a single-family dwelling.
Recommended Action: `
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2206:
a. Finding that Conditional Use Permit No. 88047 will
- not cause any significant environmental impacts;
and certify the Negative Declaration as adequate.
b. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 88047, subject
�� to stated conditions and requirements.
7. Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 88049
3280 Lynwood Road (City of Lynwood)
Comments•
This is an application for Tentative Parcel Map approval in
order to subdivide parcels into three (3) separate lots.
. Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration; the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2207:
a. Finding that the proposed amendment is exempt from the `_,
: , provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended.
- b. Approving Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 88049, subject ;
to stated conditions and reguirements: s
, a
�
. �
� � � � E
�
�
`s
V11A:Agenda ?
i 6
L
_ 3
� i
e
R
:
t
�:,-:.,.
:.w
. i .,
8. Conclitional Use Permit - Case No. 88051
5221-5225 Beechwood Avenue (Roberto & Maria Gonzalez) -
Comments: -
The applicants are requesting a Conditional Use Permit to �':-='
build seven (7) apartments for senior citizens in the front
of an existing single family dwelling. However, the plans
submitted do not meeting the code requirements. Staff needs
additional time to work with the applicants to resolve
certain problems with the site plans.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission continue Conditional Use Permit No. 88051
to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
September 13, 1988.
9. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88052
11664 Virginia Avenue (William Flores)
Comments •
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to
build two (2) apartments in the R-2 (Two-family
Residential) zone.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planninq Commission adopt Resolution No. 2209:
a. Finding that Conditional Use Permit No. 88052 will
is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines, as amended.
b. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 88052, subject
to stated conditions and requirements.
lO.Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88053
3342 Norton Avenue (Guillermino Munoz)
Comments•
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to
build five (5) apartments at the rear of an existing _
single family dwelling in the R-3 (Multiple-family
Residential) zone.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration,
the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2210:
a. Findinq that Conditional Use Permit No. 88053 will
not have a siqnificant effect on the environment, and
certify the Negative Declaration as adequate. �:;�
b. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 88053, subject to
the stated conditions and requirements. ,
V11A:Agenda
: :I
:::J
4
==,
: �,
�-:� �
r �
. Y.'.'.'.'.':
11. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88054 :':;;r;;
12433 Atlantic Avenue (Serqio Lopez)
Comments•
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to
build eight (8) apartments in the R-3 (Multiple-family
Residential) zone.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2219:
a. Finding that Conditional Use Permit No. 88054 will
not cause any significant environmental impacts -_
and certify the Negative Declaration as adequate. �::;
t:f'S�
�
b. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 88054, subject ���-�:
,.:�_..
�:<::
to stated conditions and requirements.
i-�k
12. Conditional Use Permit - No. 88058 t "��
�;::�.
5216 Sanborn Avenue (Alfredo Palacios)
Comments• -
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to
build four (4) apartments at the rear of an existing single
family dwelling in the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) ��2:-i%
�.;;.;-
zone.
'�s'= ::
Recommended Action: � %%%
r:::,::
fi-i.'-"r:'
�.,;;.;
Staff res ectfull re uests that after consideration, �-•%�
P Y 4 � �:?'=;:
the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2234: ;:,;.;;
L.'::::
a. Finding that Conditional Use Permit No. 88058 will
not cause any significant environmental impacts and �:-<::
certify the Negative Declaration as adequate. :`�"'''
�:- .,
:;;:,
,� >:t- �
b. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 88058, subject _.i
to stated conditions and requirements. "�`�
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS '
NONE
�:is
STAFF COMMENTS
�;v;
1. Appeal of Planning Commission decision - Conditional Use �"='
Permit No. 88028 (Willard Michlin) �?
�;=.
�51
On June 14, 1988, the Planning Commission did not approve the ���'
applicant's request to build three (3), three-bedroom
apartments on the rear of a lot developed with a single
family home at 3327 Sanborn Avenue, Lynwood, CA.
However, the Planning Commission informed the applicant that :'
if the project were scaled down to two (2), three-bedroom ��
apartments, the Commission would reconsider the application. _
The applicant did not wish to scale down the project and, on =�
June 23, 1988, he filed an appeal to the City Council.
V11A:Agenda
5
��
�
This matter was heard by the City Council at its reqular
meeting on July 19, 1988. The Council upheld the decision
of the Planning Commission.
The applicant now wishes to re-apply for a conditional use
permit to develop the site with two (2) units.
2. Zoning Ordinance Amendment--Helistops
At its regular. meeting on July 19, 1988, the City Council
� remanded the proposed helistop ordinance back to the Planning
� Commission for further study.
3. Zoning Ordinance' Amendment--Density Bonus
The City Council adopted the density bonus ordinance, with
_ minor modifications, at its regular meeting on July 19, 1988.
• The ordinance will become effective on August 20. 1988.
� 4. The Multiple-Family Residential (R-2 and R-3) zone study will
be presented to the Planning Commission in September, 1988.
COI�II�4ISSION ORALS -
PUBLIC ORALS
{Information items only)
ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the next regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on September 13, 1988, at 7:30 p.m., in the City
Hall Council Chambers, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood,
California.
�
�
. 6
I
� �
AGENDA ITEM NO. ----
DATE: August 9, 1988 C NV• �"_-���
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
BY: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88052
Applicant: William Flores
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to build one
duplex comprising of one (1) two-bedroom and one (1) three-bedroom
units at 11664 Virginia Avenue in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential-
zone.
FACTS
1. Source of Authority
Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Municipal Code.requires that a
Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to build and/or
relocate any dwelling unit in the R-2 zone.
2. Property Location
The subject property consists of a single lot on Virginia Avenue
between Cortland Street and Fernwood Avenue (See attached
Location Map).
3. Property Size
The subject is a rectangular shaped lot that is fifty (50') feet
wide and one hundred and five (105') feet deep; the total area
is approximately five thousand,. two hundred and fifty (5,250)
square feet.
4. Existing Land Use
The property is a vacant lot and the surrounding land uses are i
as follows:
North - Two-Family Residential
South - Two-Family Residential
East - Two-Family Residential �
West - Two-Family Residential i
�
5. Land Use Description I
The General Plan designation for the subject property is Two- I
Family Residential, and the zoning classification is R-2 (Two-
Family Residential). The surrounding land uses are as follows: I
General Plan: Zoning: �
I
North - Two-Family Residential R-2 i
South - Multiple-Family Residential R-2 & R-3 �
East - Two-Family Residential R-2 �
West - Two-Family Residential R-2 I
I
DISK 30:88052CUP !
�
i
I
I
(
I
6. Project Characteristics
The applicant proposes to build one (1) one-story duplex
consisting of one (1) two-bedroom and one (1) three-bedroom
units with a total habitable space of 1,920 square feet,
covering approximately 36.5� of the total lot area. The
development will include four (4) garaqes to be located at the
rear of the buildinq. The alley will be used as access to the
garages.
A six (6') foot high block wall will be constructed along the
perimeter of the lot, except in the twenty (20') feet front yard
setback in which the wall will not exceed four (4') feet in
height.
A minimum of twenty-five (25�) percent of the site area will
comprise of landscaped open space with an automatic irrigation
system installed. The site plan shows that 31� of the lot will
be landscaped.
7. Site Plan Review
On July 14, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the
Proposed development and recommended approval by the Planning
Commission, subject to specific conditions.
8. Zoning Enforcement History
None of record.
9. Public Response
A letter from the Lynwood Unified School District is
attached.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS '
i
1. Consistency with General Plan �
I
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning
classification (R-2) and the General Plan designation (Two-
Family Residential). Therefore, granting Conditional use Permit
, No. 88052 will not adversely affect the General Plan.
2. Site Suitability i
The subject property is adequate in size and shape to accomodate �
the proposed development relative to proposed density, bulk of I
the structures, parking, wall, fences, driveways and other �
development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. �
Furthermore, the subject property is adequately served with the I
required public utilities and offers adequate vehicular and
pedestrian accessibility. I
3. Compliance with Development Standards
The proposed development meets all the Development Standards
required by the Zoning Ordinance regarding off-street parking; �
front, side, and rear yard setbacks; lot coverage, building I
height; unit size; and density. �
f
4. Compatibility i
The proposed development is surrounded by two-family residential i
land uses; therefore, the project will be compatible with
current and future development in the area. The base density �
within the R-2 zone (14 units per acre) would allow the �
development of one duplex on the property. �
I
�
I
,
5. Conditions of Approval
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a
negative effect on the values of the surroundinq properties or
, interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare.
Henefits to Community
The proposed development will aid to aesthetically upgrade the
neighborhood and will add favorably to the City's housing stock.
6. Environmental Assessment
It has been determined that this development will not cause any
significant environmental impacts in the area, and a Negative
Declaration has been prepared and is on file in the Planning
Division and the Office of the City Clerk.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2209:
1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 88041,
will not cause a significant environmental impact in the
surrounding area, and certify the Negative Declaration as
adequate.
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 88041, subject
to the stated conditions and requirements.
Attachments• �
I
1. Location Map !
2. Site Plan �
3. Resolution No. 2209
�
i
�
�
I
�
i
j
i
�
.
(
�
i
I
I
DISK 30:88052CUP �
� I
i
LOCATION MAP
S. y � � �.. , ' N �O`C �'�)!/ 7f�lI�V� VIRII�ro �i�,lJ. J .
�� J
.:.. �` 8 CA4TLAN0
$ ST
� '` �•. �s
p � � . . � iot 9J � � >i. an
tJ � O 2iJS � ro fJ.Jl� y �' Ml2J> ip p 1dtQ` A 0�1t�
�,��, �- � en� � Y'f /lLO� W ��?�� N,`� � a i ���� . W M•��a 1n � sii ., � f i
;.���:Q'.; . � )i� U o ¢ �'D a y, i1D°' � Q � ii .�� �
�.��':9.'�:> .� ti yy� ^ a' s . N GaDS 1�
1 i s. � io , p
�� .II��M� , f���v N4l hll� ' �' p 7i.a. �
— M � ' P ' ' � �.. a � M , ��n V � S
! N IIIU iW i. p a �� ♦ Q
' e�' � � lD Il�i:
. �I , —// 77� . 11 N4 i s �
�I � � }� p (� , II4rt � � p Il.n ` I
�1 'Y� 6 1�� � a is ` � W )�s� , Il:fi . I
' ___16� • � �! m ��.�� � N o � 1A � � � �
. �..' �i ' /(� � 1 , � � � ' � � b �� I
.. Ir � _ � �, .�s . d�» �o � 11
. . . � � / Ga � a ' ,ov. e ° ..a. rs . ,
� U43 � u�,� j ���•�
�L� o c� �.G o o O o 0 s o ia.� o o I
..t.,.'� h /� � M �I �.�� � ��oG00 Bi r //�ts + a
' 1 O M �� •J p \ ti O� U t.5 // .
� , ti N $ .� 0 � ti � n �i „�:: ° o i .yl o
� / 6 � t* .., .oz �i m u�.� v Q �
'_'Cl.� 7l�� f�G��+ � N ,Il�s� o � . I
� � o
1 N t0 � ii, � ion � 4 , p�bbas .
� ,��aa 1 �• a• h iea oo �
�
� ^___..� ^ � � : � � Lar . io io�' � O •• 1 1
lU! �4V � . � � ollYoo p � � , 1(( y . = � a � I
G i� � " Ul ' n
,::>;;:.::.;;::: $ _ $ $ i
� �l{65 '::;:.:: A � II��s . ♦.� Il�c� p��i
Q�' _ �::::`s::::%::�'�E;; � � ` • � ` 4 � �' $ —
� Q :>.: u ,, �48�. �J .r�. �o �
;". /r��d,v_e MN/!1/II� ��li4�oa°n � ti�. ��c C',N,'�� : Q I
/oo oJ ' iat /dt � /ot �e M ti �
. � ioo ...'_ ' � ; i . a i . � � io . i t iai � � � �
.
�.�1�: 'N7'R.M e M,,� ti . �u , � �,,... � ;,— , ; � ,
.. � �eu�.r..e �. f0 i11�0� L i050 ������ � • I
, ,^ E b „ ei �1 0/.I J p ` I
I �:" ' �„`. FFRNN'ppD-r < x,` r '=ti'n�, x�-�rr.,.� ,,+oii.��i a v��
�1 ea s9 � d � O.JJ 1.. � I
x y. , R �h M , �,tis � •�
� � �� fS// �, OO � ( I
i . IJ �1 I
I
AVE ^ �
o .n FER i
Z � n � �, _ /y�
�w I
. I J � u"b t ��n �h� � i!
r iun�
Q s u�,� j .a 7 r. :-; . I
� .. I : � �.��-- � n,o6 r� z? u n,�. .
� r •,y n,�� , d ��, s I
� ,,,�= rr r� x
� _ L,o, W � . 3t i
� j � / f � ini i. n !i �nn ,�, nvo J � t
`--. .. �'.__.•___.7. . ' ' � �.�' � i... ' t/ �n�� � �
- . . . . _ _i._..u...___- .
_.... i
�
I
I
�
�
� � OS�- I
_ I
• ,.�f�w so�,h .
8 0 'c
�n � � � LYNWOOD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
* *
esr. �ew
11JJt PLAZ/+
LaVONEIA C. STEEIE, EC.�., SUPERINiENDENT OF SCHOOLS �yNWOOD, GALIFORNIA 90282
MARIA�ELENA ROMENO
(21J) 803�1<05
FACILITES PLANNER
��
July 28, 7988
Vincent L. Mas
Director
Community Development Department
City of Lynwood
11330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, CA 90262
RE: Potential Impact of Proposed Development on Public School
System Case No. 88052
Dear Mr. Mas:
Please be advised . that the Lynwood Unified School District has
received notice of the above application for the proposed residential
development, to be located at 71664 Virginia Avenue.
The proposed development is located in the Will Rogers School
Attendance Area. This school is currently overcrowded and although
portable classrooms are being used to heip alleviate the problem, the i
long range solution to the overcrowded conditions requires the
construction of several new schools. This long range solution will �
take three to five years. ,
f
In addition, any proposed new enrollees due to this residential project �
will be attending Hosler Junior High School and Lynwood High School, i
both of which are also experiencing severe overcrowded conditions.
The impact of this development to our enrollment may be as follows: �
Primary: 0.6 Yield Factor x 2 units = 7.2 new students i
Secondary: 0.3 Yield Factor x 2 units = 0.6 new students
_ _ j
If you require any further information, please feel free to contact us.
Very truly yours, �
(
' f '
i
'r � � ;
� . -.-
MA A ROMERO �
r � nri �
Facilit' s Pianner ("�'�'':- , ���'"�
' bm ,. � ; .. . . .,. ... _ �
cc: LaVoneia C. Steele, Ed. D. �' � ` ^' `'- ' - '
. �
Clifford A. Koch, Asst. Supt., Bus. Serv. �
1
�
j
. .... ' ; : . . . ,
�..-. � : : � �..�.;..;. �
_ � .. . . . y :.
. ,.:: � .: . _ � �. . .. � . . . . �. . . . , ., ; � ,.. I
_. ..;.... . . :.> �:.. . �
��'�.: � . :� .,;. �:.. :�.; ...�.: r; :: :�.,. � ' .
i
.. . , : . . .. '
i
.. .. � - � . . ... . �
' I
� � � . � ���`��
. . � � ' � �.� I
,.>: � .:.:.>. -::.. - . . :..,; �. , . . . ,
. .. � :. �' . .. �
... . . . . � . �
- i
,..,.. .. . , . ..':.:: . '. .
� .. . � , . ' . � . �
. . _. ' � .. . � .,. I
88052CUP
RESOLUTION NO. 2209
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CO[�'II�'IISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 88052 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DUPLEX AT
11664 VIRGINIA AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, IN
THE R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE.
WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law,
conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all pertinent
testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for any
development in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone.
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines as follows:
A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape
' to accomodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping,
driveways and other development features required by the
Official Zoning Ordinance.
B. The structures, as proposed, or modified, subject to
conditions, will not have a neqative effect on the values
of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger
the public health, safety, or welfare.
C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current zoning
regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the
Site Plan Review Committee.
D. The proposed development will aid in aesthetically i
, upgrading the surrounding area.
I
E. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not I
adversely affect the General Plan. �
I
I
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood I
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby I
approves Conditional Use Permit No. 88052, provided the following �
conditions are observed and complied with at all times: �
�
I
i
j
DISK 30:88052RES �
1
�
'
I
�
Community Development Department
1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable
regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform
Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code.
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or
structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community
Development Department, Planning Division, for review of said
Conditional Use Permit.
3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments.
4. The applicant or his/her representative shall sign a Statement
of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and
agrees to all conditions of this resolution within fifteen_
(15) days from the date of adoption of said resolution by the .
Planning Commission.
Planning Division
5. The applicant is required to submit a landscape plan drawn by
a licensed landscape architect to the satisfaction of the
Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of any
building permits. In addition, the Landscaped areas for the
subject site must be a minimum of twenty-five (25�) percent of
the lot area.
6. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance
with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the
Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits.
7. A minimum of two (2) parking spaces and one two-car qarage i
shall be provided.
All outdoor lighting shall be directed away from adjacent �
streets and properties. �
�
8. A six (6') foot high block wall shall be installed along the '
perimeter of the property, except within the twenty (20') feet �
front yard setback. In this frontage, if built, the wall I
shall not exceed a height of four (4') feet measured from top
of curb.
�
9. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet. �
i
10. Final buildinq elevations, including materials of !
construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the '
Building Official prior to issuance of any building permits. �
11. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer �
shall pay $1.53 per square foot for residential buildings to
the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government
Code Section 53080. �
12. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved. I
13. Construction shall be completed within six (6) months from �
date of issuance of building permits. �
14. Prior to the installation or construction of any masonry wall,
the following information shall be submitted to the Planning I
Division, prior to issuance of a building permit:
i
DISK 30:88052RE5 �
I
i
�
I
i
I
�
a. Simple plot plan showing location of the masonry wall in
relation to property lines, lengths, proposed materials,
and openings or gates to provide access for vehicles and
pedestrians.
b. For masonry walls (as defined in subsection 25-2.1) a
building permit shall be applied for in addition to the
plot plan described above. All masonry walls of any
height shall need the requirements for masonry
construction as defined in Chapter 24 of the Unified
Building Code. A fee based on the valuation of the
proposed construction shall be paid to the Building
Division.
c. All masonry walls shall be required to maintain adequate
pedestrian access for the purpose of safety and
convenience. A thirty-six (36) inch or a three (3') foot
clear gate or opening shall be provided to all enclosures
for pedestrian and wheelchair access. Pedestrian and
vehicular access shall be provided separately.
d. All masonry walls shall be required to be installed with a
finished, aesthetically pleasing side facing out toward
adjacent properties or the public right-of-way.
16. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective .material
including shingles, woodshake, asphalt composite, crushed rock
and other similar roofing material that is not reflective,
glossy, or polished and/or roll form type metal roofing.
17. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of brick, ;
stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar material other
than the reflective, glossy, polished and/or roll-formed type
metal siding.
18. The two-bedroom units must be a minimum of 750 square feet and '
the three bedroom unit must be a minimum of 900 square feet. I
19. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the �
exterior elevation of th'e buildinq must be approved by the �
Director of Community Development. I
20. The trash area shall be relocated to the North Eastern corner �
and it shall be enclosed by decorative masonry walls with I
gates to the standards and specifications of the City Building
Division.
21. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in a
. I
consistent manner, including the incorporation within the side '
and rear building elevations of same or all of the design �
elements used for the primary (front) facades. �
i
22. To encourage visual interest, building elevations greater than !
35 feet in length shall be differentiated architecturally by �
recessed entries and windows, designer windows, off-set planes �
and/or other architectural details in a harmonious manner to �
provide dimensional relief to the satisfaction of the Director �
of Community Development. �
23. Applicant shall contact the Post Office Department (Lynwood �
main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving �
the proposed development. �
I
I
I
DISK 30:88052RES
t
�
�
�
--- I
• 24. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilating equipment,
swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical
devices shall be located within the rear yard or street side
yard of a corner lot. Such equipment shall be screened from
, surrounding properties and streets and so operated that they
do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring
residents, in accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance.
25. The required front, rear and side yards shall be landscaped
and shall consist predominantly of plant materials except for
necessary walks, drives, and fences.
26. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one-
hundred eighty (180) days after the use permitted has been
abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised.
Public Works/Enqineering Division
27. Submit a copy of property deed or recent title report to the
Department of Public Works.
28. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered
Civil Engineer. Grading plan will be checked by Public Works
Department. No building permits will be issued prior to the
approval of grading plan by City Engineer.
29. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk along Virginia Avenue. '
30. Construct 24" wide gutter and asphalt pavement along property
frontage on Virginia Avenue.
i
31. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected
separately. Construct laterals as necessary. I
32. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass. i
33. Underground all utilities. i
34. Obtain an improvement plan for the area surroundinq the �
subject project from Caltrans and submit it to the Department i
of Public Works. i
I
I
35. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all j
off-site improvements. I
36. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire '
protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The ,
work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the �
developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the �
Public Works/Engineerinq Division prior to performing any �
work. �
Fire Department �
37. If security bars are placed on bedroom windows, at least one j
window for each bedroom shall have quick release mechanisms �
that doe not require a key or any special knowledge (U.B.C.
Sec. 1204). �
i
38. Provide smoke detectors (U.L. and State Fire Marshal approved i
type).
i
I
I
DISK 30:88052RES I
i
'
I
I
•`~ • Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to
the applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of August, 1988, by members
of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Donald Dove, Chairman
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes
Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney
;
I
I �
I
i
!
DISK 30:88052RES ,
I
I
I
�
� � �.��r�cA iYEM No. g _
CASE N0. ��D 51 _
August 9, 1988
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director �
Community Development Department i
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88051 �
Applicants: Roberto and Maria Gonzalez 'i
I
PROPOSAL `.i
i
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to �
build seven (7) studio-style senior citizens' apartment !
units, and maintain an existing single-family dwelling at ;
5221-5225 Beechwood Avenue, Lynwood, CA. �
FACTS '
I
The plans the applicants submitted do not meet the code �
requirements in several significant areas, and staff
requires additional time to assist the applicant in solving ,
these problems. i
RECOMMENDATION I
Staff respectfully request that the Planning Commission
continued this matter to its next regular meeting on
September 13, 1988. �
�
,
I
�
�
I
�
�
�
i
i
�
!
Disk 31:88051 �
I
I
I
9
AGENDA ITEM NO.._l�,_...�
CASE N0. g g0 5 3
DATE: August 9, 1988
TO: PLANNING CONII�lISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88053
Applicant: Guillermino Munoz
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a
five (5) unit apartment building at 3342 Norton Avenue, Lynwood.
Currently, the property is developed with a single-family residence.
FACTS
1. Source of Authority:
Section 25-4.2.A of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a
Conditional Use Permit be obtained for any residential
development in the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone.
2. Property Location:
The site is located on the south side of Norton Avenue between
Long Beach Boulevard and California Avenue (Refer to the
attached Location Map).
3. Property Size:
The site consists of a rectangular lot of approximately 8,800
square feet (50' X 176').
4. Existing Land Use:
The site is presently occupied by a single-family house. The
surrounding land uses are as follows:
North - Residential (4-plex)
South - Residential (Single-Family)
East - Residential (Single-Family)
West - Residential (Duplex)
5. Land Use Designation:
The General Plan designation for the subject property is Multi-
Family, while the zoning description is R-3. The surrounding
land use designations are as follows:
General Plan Zoning
North - Multiple-Family North - R-3
South - Multiple-Family South - R-3
East - Multiple-Family East - R-3
West - Multiple-Family West - R-3
DISK V12:88053CUP
1
I
I
6. Project Characteristics:
The property is currently developed with a single-family
dwelling. The applicant proposes to demolish the single-family
dwelling and construct a five unit apartment buildinq consisting
of three, three-bedroom units at 900 square feet each and two,
two-bedroom units at 750 square feet each.
Ten (10) parking spaces will be provided at the rear of the lot
with five (5) spaces enclosed in carports.
The proposed development exceeds the allowable density by one
(1) dwelling unit. Planning Commission has the authority to
approve units in excess of the allowable density if the units
are desiqnated as affordable units or if they are part of a
development proposal which conforms to all other zoning
requlations and which incorporates unique features into its
design.
The total height of the building is twenty-four (24') feet.
7. Site Plan Review
On July 13, 1988, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the
proposed development and recommended approval by the Planning
Commission, subject to specific conditions and requirements.
8. Zoning Enforcement History:
None of record.
9. Public Response:
A copy of a letter from the Lynwood Unified School District is
attached.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
1. Consistency with General Plan.
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning
classification (R-3) and the General Plan designation (Multiple-
Family Housing). Therefore, granting Conditional Use Permit No.
88053, will not adversely affect the General Plan.
2. Site Suitability: �
i
The subject property is adequate in size and shape to �
accommodate the proposed development relative to the proposed �
density; bulk of the structures; parking; wall fences;
driveways, and other development features required by the Zoning �
Ordinance. Furthermore, the subject property is adequately
served with the required public utilities and offers adequate '
vehicular and pedestrian accessibility. I
�
3. Compliance with Development Standards: I
The proposed development meets all the development standards i
required by the Zoning Ordinance regarding off-street parking;
front, side, and rear yard setbacks; lot coverage, height, unit �
size; and density. !
DISK V12:88053CUP �
I
2 I
i
I
I
�
9. Compatibility:
The proposed project will be located in a neighborhood that has
substantially transitioned from single-family to multiple-family
residences. Properties located to the north and west are
developed with a fourplex and duplex, respectively, and other
properties in the vicinity are developed with multiple units.
The proposed project is consistent with the R-3 zoning in the
area and with the multiple-family General Plan designation.
5. Conditions of Approval:
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a
negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or
interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare.
6. Benefits to Community:
The proposed development will aid to aesthetically upgrade the
neighborhood and will act as a catalyst to foster other quality
developments. Moreover, the development will add favorably to
the City's housing stock in furtherance of the policies of the
Housing Element of the General Plan.
7. Environmental Assessment
The proposed project could not have a significant effect on the
environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2210:
1�. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, No. 88053, will
not have a significant effect on the environment, and
certify the Negative Declaration as adequate.
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 88053 subject to
the stated conditions and requirements.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
3. Resolution No. 2210
�
DISK V12:88053CUP
� 3
LOCATION MAP
E�IZA N �
�; ��, „
� .,u •n�j ' �...i ' � �
� ,, •1 - �o.:. + � ix N i � �� '` ., , AV[„ p £LIZqg �
mu� X ��•�,., i,..,�.. i�. � i ETM
�r.l � f rl.�f :�Il"63�i iL� I � 1 i i� ; n� _ � ',ev ..re�•i�ie•r
�� 1, ,�• : � 6 �R � � l^.l 'l i i � � � � r ,o
. F ; q) 6 pl' `� ; C � � �' �
�! . v �i �� .�:. � . . 1 ' �N : 3 �' Q � I J.,.a
V q e
4 ni ,.,.• ' , � � — n �� O 7y �� �Q` � 'p ;
yl � �r � I 1 1 1
'� )
m 1. . � � '� ' 1" ' ' F �
` �1 N Il � �M ��' 1 .t ,' � � � � r .
' Z 1 �d �, .�iia... 1 1 ia 4 1 G.
�l . e.r...i ro.. � ' � �e � Y
O • 3 Lj � a e ': e�o... �� o
O � e3 � O� -�) _. K ..e.. f...�. (` i' �
' 1 .r k \tl n t �� �el } 0 I s�.au... �...1 �
. 1 x 7J . 1 _. a p 1 / � • q �t��
� ro• I I•r.. � � .�7 1'�' I,.q Iroe�o...
� . �'�. r � � 7E I'�
NO � T— � "'"^ �rrrr � � ie �� � F-�� n
p • TON : �. � m�, i... - � 7 � �
7 i :�i�.' •� ' etrr � 1 I
�' � 1
b z„ nve. ., r G..,
, , 1 m ' , ,e . ' : ~ `J ,�
, t 4 ' ao.e•� � i � 1':{i:[:i' .o NORTON �
,� z � r�>;e:�:• � "� N r i
j� � � , ': . : '�k � t:.:2•i:�i i � i ..i � '° ' ..
.. ,,.} s ta .� � O •,� �>��:�•: � i � .� i i ro.
I OZ� 1 M .?�I ({. y . !': IJ1 I � I I � I
,�r ' i �A ` ^c� O �i �, i0 ' i
' i..Q i � i
, je , •�t "'"�'� ' 3 i �.;i;';.:: f i aei i: i �� O
' r;•::;<; i "� i tC. '�:. �
r:;%:;: � i i i i i
� J .i �� u �•• e p ��o .�..� 1 i j � w.
Qn•^ � .
W F 2� �.n. 1 j � � ' �� � eo �
m N � r n r r. 4 4 0 1.0 / 1 I � �� r° � so
.1 � 4, 0 e 4 ��
' � Z N✓ L�n9� �, O4�lO O 8u� 1 ro � 1
0 �� p � � I ql4 � i< �
J •'} '"O3 '` ♦.• I I � 1 41 � 1 �
�y �' . � � I I i I � 4 ie
.7• .. ;F` ORE�S . i � �
i
l. '*7 i,�, x,� ii �� BLVD.� � � '�� ' io
x' - . " 0 .
d �_ . . � �s '. LOS FLORES w�� ,
J ��� , � ;' o; R .�i „ �
m - • °it� i ; '
i , � i
t p2 �� + i'7°' �g tT. II O �I� � �� � I 1
I �b Q I �
, 1 J3 p3 . y, asaa.. ^ t. � � � ��s O O � O �
+ I I � '19
�
. . _' r' , d,' sn � dii iir raie \ iap 1 � � 1
4 SI 1 1 '
riM � 1 1 ��r.rr ..
' ` B5 � l ,no � .
S 1 nua... ' � .
OD� V • A � 1 Q �^ 3P e Q:+..��•• �
W �� " 1 t�e. �� �� c rt0 i3 1 C
' m 1f. R M1 'm 1- ti.� �q1
� ia, re+? 1 � „a»
z K . A 1 �nt / x . s�t�u �:»
. i.rm.. e � �s
� 1 O �.B ' � I �af.l '�c'rtst �2
, "L' �Y '�ir 1
1! Y��.� � •�
t 09' .
^ "� ccisri
` "31MP.E
����
, --
88053CUP
RESOLUTION NO. 2210
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 88053 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-
STORY, FIVE (5) UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING AT 3342
NORTON AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, IN THE R-3
(MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE.
WAEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law,
conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all pertinent
testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for development
in the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone.
Section 1. The Planninq Commission hereby finds and
determines as follows:
A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape
to accomodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping,
driveways and other development features required by the
Official Zoning Ordinance.
B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, will
' not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding
properties or interfere with or endanger the public
health, safety, or welfare.
C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current zoning
regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the
Site Plan Review Committee.
D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not
adversely affect the General Plan.
' Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby
approves Conditional Use Permit No. 88053, provided the following
conditions are observed and complied with at all times:
DISK V12:88053RES
I
Eire.Department
17. Provide approved smoke detectors for each unit.
18. Provide approved portable fire extinguisher within 75 foot
travel distance.
19. If security bars are placed on bedroom windows, they shall
meet requirements of the U.B.C. Section 1204.
20. Where security gates are installed on premises the locking
mechanism shall be of the type that does not require a key or
any special knowledqe to exit premises.
21. Provide knox box at entrance, contact Bureau of Fire
Prevention for information.
22. Post "No Parking" signs in driveway.
Public Works/Enaineering Division
23. Site plan is incorrect. Correct the property dimensions and
resubmit. 176 feet instead of 178 feet on E/W property line.
24. Dedicate a three (3') feet wide strip of property along Norton
Avenue.
25. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered
Civil Engineer. Grading plan will be checked by Public Works
Department. No building permits will be issued prior to the
approval of qrading plan by City Engineer.
26. Close existing drive approach and construct proposed drive
approach(es) per City standards.
27. Construct two (2) wheelchair ramps at northeast and southwest
corners of Norton and Long Beach Boulevard.
28. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected
separately. Construct laterals as necessary.
29. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass.
30. Underground all utilities.
31. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all
off-site improvements.
32. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire
protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The
work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the
developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the
Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any
work.
DISK V12:88053RES
Section 3. The Community Development Department has
determined that the proposed project will not have a significant,
effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been
prepared.
Section 4. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to
the applicant.
� APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of August, 1988, by members
of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
' NOES: .
ABSENT:
- ABSTAIN:
Donald Dove, Chairperson .
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes
Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney
DISK V12:88053RES'
r ' I
`H�AEO s�j�� .
�� n
� *� �* LZ'NWOOD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
<sr �ve^
LeVONEIA C. STEELE; Ed.O., SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS >»3� P�A�A
' - LYNWO00, CAL�FORNIA 90282
MAPIA�ELENA NOMEflO � (213) 803�1405
FACILITES PLANNER � .
h'j�hsaa9ete . . , ,
July 28, 7988
Vincent L. Mas
Director
Community Development Department
City of Lynwood
- 11330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, CA 90262
RE: Potential Impact of Proposed Development on Public School
System Case No. 88053
Dear Mr.� Mas:
Please ,be advised that the Lynwood Unified School District has
received notice of the above application for the proposed residential
development, to be located at 3342 Norton Avenue
The proposed development is iocated in the Roosevelt School
Attendance Area. This school is currently overcrowded and although
portable classrooms are being used to he�p alleviate the problem, the
long range solution to the overcrowded conditions requires the
construction of several new schools. This long range solution will
take three to five years.
In addition, any proposed new enrollees due to this residential project
will be attending Hosler Junior High Schooi and Lynwood High School,
both of which are also experiencing severe overcrowded conditions.
The impact of this development to our enrollment may be as follows:
Primary: 0.6 Yield Factor x 5 units = 3.0 new�students
Secondary: 0.3 Yield Factor x S units = 1.5 new students
If you require any further information, please feel free to contact us.
Very truly yours,
�
�� �
/, .. ' r
� � MAR A ROMERO � � �����
Fa 'it'es Planner �
s� � � ...
bm � ' '
,. cc: ' LaVoneia C. Steele, Ed. D.
. Clifford A. Koch, Asst. Supt., Bus. Serv.
. .,_: � � -.. -
:.- ; � : ,
,
;
,_._ .
� - - A��"�DA lTEM N� i,���r� i � tr
C,�'�S� I�O. ,�.� � 5' `'.�
" DATE: August 9, 198$
° TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88054 •
Applicant: Sergio Lopez
PROPOSAL
, The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit in order to
construct two (2) two-story buildings comprising of eight (8)
two-bedroom units at 12433 Atlantic Avenue in the R-3 (Multiple-
Family Residential) zone. , '
FACTS
1. Source of Authority
Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that a
Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to build and/or
relocate any dwelling unit in the R-3 zone.
� Z. Property Location
The subject property is a single lot that runs from Atlantic
Avenue to Cookacre Street between Carlin Avenue and Olanda
Street (See attached Location Map).
3. Property Size
' The lot is rectanqular in shape and is measured at about
sixty nine (69') feet wide and two-hundred forty one (241')
feet'� deep; the total area is approximately 16,629 square
feet.
' 4. Existing Land Use
, The property is currently vacant with the following
surrounding land uses:
North - Multiple-Family Residential
' ' South - Multiple-Family Residential
East - Commercial
West - Two-Family Residential
: 5. Land Use Description
The General Plan designation for said property is Multiple-
Family Residential, and the zoning classification is R-3.
The surrounding land uses are as follows: ,
GeneraT Plan: Zoning:
North - Multiple-Family Residential North - R-3
` South - Multiple-Family Residential South - R-3
East - Commercial (Controlled Business) East - CB-1
West - Two-Family Residential West - R-2 "
DISK 30:88054CUP
1
'i
6. Project Characteristics
The applicant proposes to build two (2) two-story buildinqs
each of which will consist of four (4) two-bedroom units with •
a total habitable space of about 9,936 square feet that
• covers approximately 60°s of the total lot area. As provided
' by State Law, applicant has requested a 25� percent density
bonus. The development will include fifteen (15) carports
and two open parking spaces. The open spaces will be
located between the two buildings. One parking space will be
designed for the handicapped.
A six (6') foot high block wall will be constructed along the
perimeter of the lot, except in the twenty (20') feet front
yard setback in which the wall will not exceed four (4') feet
in height. The site plan shows approximately 27% of the lot
will be landscaped.
' 7. Site Plan Review
On July 12, 1988, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated
'the proposed development and recommended approval by the
Planning Commission, subject to specific conditions.
8. 2oning Enforcement History
None of record.
9. Public Response
A copy of a letter from the Lynwood Unified School District
is attached.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
1. consistency with General Plan
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning
classification (R-3) and the General Plan designation
,° (Mitltiple-Family Residential). Therefore, granting
Conditional Use Permit No. 88054 will not adversely affect
. the General Plan_
2. Site Suitability
The subject property is adequate in size and shape to
accomodate the proposed development relative to proposed
" density, bulk of the, structures, parking, wall fences,
driveways and other development standards required by the
Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, the subject property is
adequately served with the required public utilities and
offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility.
3. Compliance with Development Standards
The proposed development meets aIl the DeveZopment Standards
required by the 2oning Ordinance regarding off-street
parking; front, side, and rear yard setbacks; lot coverage,
building height; unit size; and density.
DISK 30:88054CUP
2
4. Compatibility
The proposed development is surrounded by multiple-family
residential and commercial land uses; therefore, the project
will be compatible with current and future developments in
, the area. The base density within the R-3 zone (18 units per
acre) would allow the development of seven (7) units on the
property; however, with the 25$ density bonus for low and
moderate income housing, the developer is able to build an
additional dwelling unit.
5. Conditions of ApProval
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have
•' a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties
or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or
welfare.
6. Benefits to Community `
The proposed development will aid in aesthetcally upgrading
the neighborhood and will add favorably to the City's housing
stock.
7. Environmental Assessment
, It has been determined that this development will not cause
any siqnificant environmental impacts in the area;
Consequently, a Negative Declaration has been prepared and is
- on file in the Planning Division and the Office of the City
Clerk.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning �
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2219:
, 1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 88054
will not cause a significant environmental impact in the
surrounding area, and certify the Negative Declaration
: as adequate.
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 88054,
subject to the stated conditions and requirements.
, ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
3. Resolution No. 2219
- DISK 30:88054CUP
3
LOCATION MAP
i'si. �' CARLIN � AVE. � ` t'. � , �
` ' ��w'y� � . `�..���., __ � AVES �1
g ' d �^RC�
� ;�, _ .i �. ' � N '\
� � � � . .. u .r� r .n g .
.. (�+> .N . ��.. O_ !o • 3 � .
� ' i �� �___.n _ � ^ p, u io •t�i
� '. Y i.ora� ti ` a ��s
. i
. ' , � K rw� ,Q, 8 r N a ' " .� � xo se. ;
� ' I . 1 '�Sf�dS: A!`S � _ 7[ �� q D �' ' � . , �
. m x " r__"__' .� � _
'�� � illt e r j 55 � di
p p w.
� 9 t "- ""-'- � �`'� :f'e {m.x f�l � � ' u r..� S Z . S' � . .
� -� � 0 � �� � j 54 " e s O O ,
i.i. p0 �'
z� �p i ; , n x 6� p
„ � I �/s6.9 � O a � O $ � S.�{ 62 6,�
u � i 0 ..... ' d" '
o � � > , . ,,., • 1 .
.. Z i ` O 4 � O � � H y J'a a 0'' 0. �
. m . as.� i ae ��
� � ---- i.. fJ'. L'-- �:.. � .:�•. ---� . S0 a � 4�• .
�. in O q r________� }f:;-0F:•�'r'r:�t<' :>i:. x CARDWELL � . a ,
: ;�:'.��':�.
" J� O „ xo"
� 1^ :: 'r:•0.�. a 0 2 �' , � '. ,
n<.� a e
� � m
�
�
. � O zt c— � =S 2 e� � ' �
. � y r
- s . n o ' Q �dT � .
� ' 2o e
� � . I �` _� . . i � .��..... ' � 21 '
� �y�:� 2p. (
' —O A � ,Q ... ' ,o
� I � 20 rv"' ��..
. I ' . D . . tu.• � ' /) �
NU L �l0
L L w., „�1',. Ia
. . q V � N � /. L�UM O • ( ��S
' I ' � • •� l0 . YY��. . . .
y M y
i'G • � P ♦ T � �1\ ~ O�1
' i �_ � , t • ' fi Fy '-'
1 1 Y q� � ` �
� � � Q�. Q M < " B y' C•' :;
. . <Im', iJ �' i ;Q -- � ..,, !^ S �g e s : �;> f io� < p .
�. ! a r�t � i �,. � � !, ,. i ; a.i�
! L �� I S 'A y O' sl O ` IIS � i ,.�� , � 'A
. ' I iYO '. . � 196.�05 V �� b � i � O �.� . .
� }ry x OLANDA SL x ..* ° OLANDA ST. x e � '"• 1e •°�;,� ' ' A �
' . 5T. �
.
1_.__ . _�,. ..
----- --_ _ _ .. ___ - --- -- ...--�---
,
��' � �Y
88054CUP
RESOLUTION NO. 2219
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 88054 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO
(2) FOUR UNIT APARTMENT BUILDINGS AT 12433
: ATLANTIC AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, IN THE R-
' 3 (MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE.
WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law,
conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all pertinent
testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for any development in
the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone.
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines
as.follows: �
A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape
to accomodate the structures, parkinq, walls, landscaping,
• driveways and other development features required by the
Official Zoning ordinance.
B. The structures, as proposed, or modified, subject to
conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values
of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the
public health, safety, or welfare.
C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current zoning
, regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the
Site Plan Review Committee. .
- � D. The proposed development will aid in aesthetically
upgrading the surrounding area.
E. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not
adversely affet the General Plan.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
. based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby
approves Conditional Use Permit No. 88054, provided the following
conditions are observed and complied with at all times:
DISK 30:88054RES
Community Development Department ,
1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable
- regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building
- Code and the Unform Fire Code.
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or
structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community
- Development Department, Planning Division, for review of said
Conditional Use Permit.
3. ,The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments.
, 4. The applicant or his/her representative shall sign a Statement
of Acceptance indicating he/she has read, understands and
agrees to all conditions of this resolution.
Planning Division
5. The applicant is required to submit a landscape plan drawn by a
licensed landscape architect to the satisfaction of the
. DIrector of Community Development prior to the issuance of any
building permits. In addition, the landscaped areas for the
subject site must be a minimum of twenty-five (25$) percent of
the lot area.
, 6. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance
with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the
Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits.
' 7. A minimum of sixteen (16) parking spaces for residents and one �
space for guests shall be provided. In addition, all outdoor
lighting shall be directed away from adjacent streets and
properties.
8. A six (6') foot high block wall shall be installed along the
perimeter of the property, except within the twenty (20') feet
front yard setback. In this frontage, if built, the wall shall
not exceed a height of four (4') feet measured from top of
curb. -
9. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet.
10. Final building elevations, including materials of construction, .
shall be submitted to and approved by the Buildinq Official
prior to issuance of any building permits. -
11. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer
shall pay $1.53 per square foot for residential buildings to
the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government
Code Section 53080.
� 12. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved.
13. Construction shall be completed within six (6) months from date
of issuance of building permits.
' 14. Prior to the installation or construction of any masonry wall,
the property owner shall obtain a permit for and submit the
following information to the Planning Division.
' a. Simple plot plan showing location of the masonry wall in
relation to property lines, lengths, . proposed materials,
" and openings or gates to provide access for vehicles and µ
pedestrians. `
DISK 28:88054RE5
�
r:
b. For masonry walls (as defined in subsection 25-2.1) a
building permit shall be applied for in addition to the
plot plan described above. All masonry walls of any height
shall .need the requirements for masonry construction as
defined in Chapter 24 of the Unified Building Code. A fee
- based on the valuation of the proposed construction shall
be paid to the Building Division.
c. Al1 masonry walls shall be required to maintain adequate
pedestrian access for the purpose of safety and
convenience: A thirty-six (36") inch or a three (3') foot
clear gate or opening shall be provided to all enclosures
for pedestrian and• wheelchair access. Pedestrian and
' vehicular access shall be provided separately.
d. All masonry walls shall be required to be installed with a
finished, aesthetically pleasing side facing out toward
adjacent properties or the public right-of-way.
e. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void
- ninety (90) days after the use permitted has been abandoned
or has ceased to be actively exercised.
15. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective material
including shingles, woodshake, asphalt composite, crushed rock
and other similar roofing material that is not reflective, •
glossy, or polished and/or roll form type metal roofing.
16. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of brick,
stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar material other
than the reflective, glossy, polished and/or roll-formed type
metal siding.
17. The two-bedroom units must be a minimum of 750 square feet.
18.- Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the
exterior elevation of the building must be approved by the
Director of Community Development.
19. The trash area shall be relocated to the rear of the property
and it shall be enclosed by a decorative masonry wall with
gates to the standards and specifications of the City Building
Division.
20. All 'building elevations shall be architecturally treated in a
� consistent manner, including the incorporation within the side
and rear building elevations of same or all of the design
elements used for the primary (front) facades.
21. To encourage visual interest, building elevations greater than
35 feet in length shall be differentiaged architecturally by
recessed entries and windows, designer windows, off-set planes
and/or other architectural details in a harmonious manner to
provide dimensional relief to the satisfaction of the Director
of Community Development.
22. Applicant shall contact the Post Office Department (Lynwood
main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving
the proposed development.
23. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilating equipment,
swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical
� devices shall be located within the rear yard or street side
yard of a corner lot. Such equipment shall be screeened from
surrounding properties and streets and so operated that they do
not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring
residents, in accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance.
DISK 30:88054RES
24. The required front, rear and side yards shall be landscaped and
shall consist predominantly of plant materials except for
necessary walks, drives, and fences.
Public Works/EnaineerinQ Division
25. .Dedicate a£ive (5') foot wide strip of property along Cookacre
Avenue.
26. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered Civil
� _ Engineer. Grading plan will be checked by Public Works
_ Department. No building permits will be issued prior to the
approval of grading plan by City Engineer.
27. Construct new sidewalk, curb and gutter, drive approach(es) and -
required pavement along Cookacre Avenue.
28. Construct new drive approaches per City standards; One on
Atlantic Avenue and one on Cookacre.
29. Close existinq drive approach and construct proposed drive
, approach(es) per City standards.
30. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected
separately. Construct laterals as necessary.
31. Install two (2) 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood
standards; One on Atlantic Avenue and one on Cookacre Avenue. '
Species to be carrot wood. A permit to install the trees is
required by the Engineering Division. Exact locations of the
trees will be determined at the time the permit is issued.
32. Underground all utilities.
33. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all off-
site improvements.
34. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire
protection lines•shall be installed by the developer. The work
shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the
developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the Public .
Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any work.
'i
Fire Department -
35. Provide approved (U.L. and State Fire Marshall) smoke detectors
for each unit as required.
36. Provide one (1) 2A type fire extinguisher within 75 ft. travel
distance on each floor. _
' 37. Provide and post "No Parking - Fire Lane", signs in driveway.
. 38. Where security gates are installed on premises, the locking
mechanism shall be of the type that does not require a key or -
any special knowledge to exit premises. Also, provide a Knox
Box at front of property.
Section 3. A copy of this Resolution shall be delivered to the
applicant.
DISK 30:88054RES
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of August, 1988, by members
if the Planning.COmmission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
" ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Donald Dove, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ?
Vicente L. Mas, Director pouqlas D. Barnes
Community Development Department Deputy`City Attorney
I
DISK 30:88054RES
a
. ��,"eo ,�,,�
8 a °
. T� a� LYNWOOD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
* *
esr. �ew
' � � � LeVONEIA Q STEELE, Ed.D., SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS ����� P
' LYNWpOD, CAUFORNIA BOY82
MARIA�ELENA ROMEqO (�13) 8034405
FAG�ITES PLANNER �
�'� July 28, 1988 '
Vincent L. Mas
Director
Community Development Department
City of Lynwood
17330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, CA 90262
RE: Potential Impact of Proposed. Development on Public School
System Case No. 88054
Dear Mr. Mas:
Please be advised that the Lynwood Unified School District has
received notice of the above application for the proposed residential
development, to be located at 12433 Atlantic Avenue
The proposed development is located in the Mark Twain School
• Attendance Area. This school is currently overcrow e� and although
portable classrooms are being used to help alleviate the problem, the
long range solution to the overcrowded conditions requires the
construction of several new schoois. This long range solution wili
. take three to five years. '.
. In addition, any proposed new enrollees due to this residential project
will be attending Hosler Junior High School and Lynwood High School,
both of which are also experiencing severe overcrowded conditions.
, The impact of this development to our enrollment may be as follows:
Primary: 0.6 Yield Factor x 8 units = 4.8 new students
'. Secondary: 0.3 Yield Factor x 8 units = 2.4 new students
If you require any further information, please feel free to contact us.
Very truly yours,
. /,
�: _ � , N
i
MA �� ��L A ROMERO � � ,?,`, ��
F ci ities Planner ;�„� :�_ i -
bm/ .. .
cc: LaVoneia C. Steele, Ed. D. , �._.;�,
Clifford A. Koch, Asst. Supt., Bus. Serv.
'?; _ ._.
; ` . .. ._ _ : , .
_ �`
'� AGENDA ITEM N0. �-
CASE N0. �80 5 g _
DATE: August 9, 1988 -
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 88058
Applicant(s): Mr. & Mrs. Alfredo Palacios
Proposal•
The applicants are 'requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to build four (4) apartment units at the rear of an
existing single-family dwelling at 5216 Sanborn Avenue, Lynwood, `
CA. The total number of units to be maintained on the lot is
five (5). -
Facts
1. Source of Authoritv
Section 25-4.5 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a �
Conditional Use Permit be obtained for any residential ;i
development in the R-3 zone. �
:,
�
�
2. Property Location y
The subject property is an interior lot located on the south ;
side of Sanborn Avenue between Duncan and Louise Avenues. =
(Refer to attached Location Map). �
3
3. Property Size �
�
The property is irregular-shaped with a land area of �
approximately 13,335 square feet.
'� i
s
4. Existinc7 Land Use ;
The subject property is developed with a single-family dwelling. ;
The surrounding land uses are as follows: �
i
North - Multiple Family East - Multiple Family �
South - Multiple Family West - Two-Family I
5. Land Use Description
The General Plan designation for the subject property is Multi-
Family; and the zoning classification is high density
residential (R-3). The surrounding land use descriptions are as
follows:
General Plan: Zoning:
North - Multiple Family North - R-3
South - Multiple Family South - R-3
East - Multiple Family East - R-3
West - Single Family West - R-2
V14A:88058cup
1
6. Project Characteristics:
The proposed project calls for the development of four, two-
bedroom, one bathroom, units in a two-story building. The
� existing single-family home will be maintained on the lot.
There are three carport parking spaces, and one two-car ,
garage, and five (5) open spaces. ,
A six foot (6') block wall will be built on the perimeter of the '
lot, except in the twenty (20') foot front yard setback area.
7. Site Plan Review
The Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed development
and recommended approval by the Planning Commission, subject
to specific conditions and requirements.
8. Zoning Enforcement History
None of record.
9. Public Response
No comments were received at the time the agenda was
prepared.
Y
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
1. Consistency with General Plan
�
The proposed project is consistent with the existing zoning j
classification (R-3) and the General Plan designation (Multiple-
Family), as well as the intent of the General Plan. The s
predominant land use in the neighborhood is medium to high ;
density residential.
�
Under the current Zoning ordinance, multiple-family residential ;
areas can accommodate up to eighteen (18) units per acre. For ;
the subject site, this is equivalent to 5.55 units. With the 25� s
deiisity bonus allowed by State Law, the applicant may be allowed
to build 6 units. The proponent is not requestinq a density ;
bonus for this project.
The proposal calls for the development of four (4) units in
addition to the existing single family dwelling for a total of �
five (5) units on the site. �
e
The existing dwelling unit is in needs repair. j
f
2. Site Suitability l
The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
proposed development.
The subject property is adequately served with the required
public utilities and offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian
accessability. In addition, Sanborn Avenue is sixty (60') feet
wide, a standard width, and is sufficient for carrying the
required traffic volume that would be generated by the proposed
use.
I
V14A:88058cup
2
3. Compliance with Development Standards
The proposed development meets all the standards required by the ,
Zoning Ordinance regarding off-street parking; front, side and '
rear yard setbacks; distance between structures; lot coverage;
building height; unit size; landscaping; and density.
4. Conditions of Approval
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a
negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or
interfere with or endanger the public health, safety,
convenience, or welfare.
5. Benefits to Community
j
The proposed development, with the conditions stated in the ''
subject resolution, will aid in aesthetically upgrading the
neighborhood and will act as a catalyst in fostering other
quality developments in the area. Furthermore, the development '
will add favorably to the City's housing stock and will provide
additional affordably-priced housing in furtherance of the �
policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan.
6. Environmental Assessment
Staff has found that no substantial environmental impact will `
result from the project; therefore, a Negative Declaration has x
been prepared, and is on file in the Community Development =
Department and the Office of the City Clerk. �
�
G
y
�
RECOMMENDATION• ;
�
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2234:
5
O
1. , Finding that the proposed development will not have a �
$
'substantial effect on the environment and certify the ;
Negative Declaration as adequate. �
z
�
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 88058, subject to the �
stated conditions and requirements. ;
S
)
I
)
�
f
Attachments• ;
1. Location Map ;
2. Site Plan � �
3. Resolution No. 2234 ;
i
�
V14A:88058cup
3 I
. '
z
. ;
LOCATION MAi�
n 770 W ° 37/ iii�!!!. `U o ... _ � . � .` ^ � � ,. ,. 'M ti Q
e �t � �s � .� � .� u�a q i � y � Q ' O .
Q i,�.. ., R ^ � .o �.
'� 16f � n�•!2f bn�.�= $ M /1 ^. � �'1 I .�.s Q,. �,
,��.. .. •, ��,��.. R 8--p==-IA �,g T
II�•� •1w- r — \. \ O� ni i�
Te nrTSe rr �,
IiiL� I�I�r % .�p , �:
!e ISf .°� !16 e bl $ � /J � � � � � i��.. k ..vu sa ro � i
�*r i ��iis iiJ ��� . 0 I,,, Vf _�- _. d Z� I � ir Z :
� � 767 v 8 i�� �• o �i��. w���5 /I : :$ o l . �" I:. �� ��, se b �I_ - � CD � ry, r e � '
�$fA ���r 1O �ris,ei�a• $ �n� i ���., t! . 1tJff nn J � 1 S �7 m � .; � " � �� •i� !0 � �.:,... �:
� ,� �r e �� � � � �
� S e � ` b `5 v .�. .� .. AVf.—_—'�` '
a - nuar4�tisr t�fi�a' ' g n � r IIJ:'
r� 766 � ; �IC !�! � tr< <ii sc �Ysao . IJ , 4 �" + ir� $ N.rr I�� �°•Ii�:o_ t �y 5 �
v / •': � 10 I. 7ti n � J ���.e. � � � iao _Lieia
ii�� ii �..�� ♦ �II:_: �= ' M w _-__� � � , ♦
° 16f e !11 �� D74 �Q rN i1 ,.. E r.oe o 0
} Y 1� �• � b p //O � 6/.Ltf � 70/O! �.�
� /� �u . y C � I li::
$ IiI o s S!0 $.. n) y�. ; • ' � ��"__ � .:„ $
, . i , r I�:. j �L o � n,. .b , ��r�e ------> �
�I .r „r ` ia . n. `` .o.uas ma.esr� i1:.- `�
° � 16! u � ��' � � $ I;' u+ � I • -
i : � �� s : • o � �7 � �,,:o � ir , �� !
:> ��.�, u�.. N��. . Z V � .
O O �+i � � ���. O S:ti
, 1Kl b ,O �12 b � �7S p p.�v 4 � � _ IYSQ_ /SOn.�.n /c
�•• IL:� `b �` � . S 5 � /Q b IM.TI '0461 '
./li�� � 1�.��� 1___ __— .. . i: Di
b 1ff , V !!! � � !7� u w' 6 A v � /S �.��. O �� ° �i .
� B ,,:„ b 0 :JJ67 I,. �
c/�.., o r,... ,.,; , . : c � o � n o `
e 2f0 �0 33� !7! p � f in- zoosi :
I:, b II�.. �r'R b /C t r __— --� ��� '
li.._ p:.. � ` t,
s "ite � $ iis ° g in u ,�, ' � o-----._—� ., i ., ,� :
,n.� ��,-. �:.. e -� T, F e /! E ti 8 .�,so � ^ `�
ii:-• � < u..� _ . _ '__' i
o �i' '
,° SfC g $ 316 $ 37/ o ii,_.. ;� o ----- T - .., '
y: b b �1 � V i30 e..a �JO. �;^ :
� is� g o 3i� $ nsj� o ���:.. ; o � o ---� i �— -�;; g �;
�,q � , �d' - -- -- ,� 6 � ° ° � !
` -- —�--
��:`� ��,,. , � , � . = --� ° �
� 75C e � 31E �$�...� � n:.. �i ,� o q li� _'_ V 1f�6.� =1TY a � ��
� '° Y F `? �° o " �- --
� b e jj� � � v .'�n.. r f �� A °�eaTso i -w o_Ll-'Sa_62_'L___
� i V � � — I �11__ :,,. J9JSs 7
tfl, a .w^ o '' 0 0 �{ � 1 __�_.._ �•, � � "' 6/ . �.� „J i
un � rr � 5 I '
ruf �`, •[e s f Z f � � -s , ,C � '� �.A � D l/
. ' ° . ' E :
�� A $, ,$ AVE. l 7�J�',�^� �' r '-- y—' � s.JO -- -,.� !
���iiu � �� rAf) ». roo DU'a r � �.� �tqe/ I�,=. r tn. I ° o i
'�' 2S ! �//' .MQ 6 O �G � ro � �o ; fo .°, y tf ` 6 — Tso �� 6p o �
S , ♦ `7 c� � ... \ � I :Y � I .- �. „v.� v JO :YJn>'.os , O i
11 "4 li w. � ...� O .� ;
O O � O� .ob �f3.6C , " ti
7fI , .isi �OS � ����„ � = �� �, ° F y .�. �
' �": �
IIJI? u�. � ��... o i�.? 2 /� 1'q o \ � _ G __ '_' -'_ __ - -p ,1 . i
2S/ !I! !bt � � .,. r �
i , n..
��ISO nlil i.. o��.. 3 � R__ �e_ f R y $ ;"� Dylcl ��... `.
!6i $ ' „ ,. � 1� ` ° isari Sd �ys.z1
�; ��,., �r�: - -: - i___ - i n - ���
�iif ��ltS A -061- `,"�• � ,y /7 � $ $ r+��e y isn � so
i,� " �- - �ss - - -
o. R,,. ��.. � i�� n�.su �t- i,u;is�• ,$ �`
�2� ���ls6 _,.r 2 ^��,,, f �i --a —�� `$ �»x �57 „��` b i
����r ? n�,. _ _ 1 _ '_ _ _
� �+ .. �� Q � �
' 217 p }!7 A -� �' 5�... � !1 .B /S nn ^ W Y �•� iSS
iL. Q � . Y. Z '� 1 . � _ _if1JJ — L _ _S"l fJ _ _ f0 0 / / �
� � $ .:� i a ~ I
��zse ue � ess � O '� .' ��..- s5
. � ���� � � is o :
i�... .�, v .w_F _� .a) __ _ tf L1 I
I.cl lin� n ,_. _' _ i50 ! tliro �
2�f '�� j� e l�n> ' V� Q /� 1�•.�f 4 �'e 1��0 � Jf �� � �
.. .,. � '� v.W � ` ... 4 �n�• � ...
i p•..c ... di �_ lllp I
f tI{ ,°� 1f0 ,y 3S7 rn�� ;t. � _ _ _ - _ "_ _ �. �N aeJ af ��i.i
' 1 1 /1 � �
. � �_p l: az. � a .
,. .,s
$ 1�! � �_ � !SQ '�-� � - '_ - _ _ _ _ -- �� `��•..i �• .ai.ss :. „�.. �
� `
� 7 �i �. ���.. :: ,
R�..., tu F_r..==__: __�''_-�::'____;-.,`^_, �nu . ,.t<tr � �
711 0 //I )O 10 JO Ja �J /O /0 /O Sa .iJ
. . esz R �ss- a �,;.. � , .� i , i i "W ,", M; �..
. a ... �_- i I 1 I I.��.F-- tw -_ °n uo to si J �
ip �b5;_ �{ � - . �e
: zu> u :.�er�: ess � <i E i= i c si : �, a so 9 � ..
�rfff� } UV .w ^- nsf�� � Hoi �� j �` VSID �f0 fO JO SO ��aS f 170/
W � �
2 � I
U �—
CASE NO. Yj�OS�
88058CUP
RESOLUTION NO. 2234
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
� CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
. PERMIT NO. 88058 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR
(4) APARTMENT UNITS AT 5216 SANBORN AVENUE,
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, IN THE R-3 (MULTIPLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject
application;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all pertinent
testimony offered at the public hearing;
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for any
development in the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone.
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines I
as follows:
�
i
A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape �
to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping, I
driveways and other development features required by the
Official Zoning Ordinance.
B. The structures, as proposed, or modified, subject to
conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values
of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the
public health, safety, convenience or welfare.
C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current zoning I
�' regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the �
Site Plan Review Committee.
i
D. The proposed development will aid in aesthetically I
upgrading the surrounding area. I
i
E. The granting of the Conditional Use permit will not
adversely affect the General Plan, in that the predominant
land uses in the area are medium to high density
residential.
F. Finding that no substantial environmental impact will �
result from the proposed project, a Negative Declaration i
has been prepared.
I
I
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, �
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby I
approves Conditional Use Permit No. 88058, provided the following
conditions are observed and complied with at all times: ;
�
I
i
V14A:Reso2234
i
�
1 �
I
I
�
' I
Community Development Department
1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable
regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building
Code and the Uniform Fire Code.
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or
structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community
Development Department, Planning Division, for review of said
Conditional Use Permit.
3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments.
4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a Statement
of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and ,
agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance i
of any building permits.
�
I
Planninq Division '
I
5. The total development shall consist of a single-family
i
dwelling, four (4) apartment units, and ten (10) parking
spaces; one-half (5) shall be covered. The minimum
dimensions shall be 10 ft. x 20 ft., while the turning radius
shall not be less than 25 ft.
6. All trash storage areas shall be enclosed within an area by a I
wall not less than six (6) feet in height, as approved by the
Building Division. I
7. A minimum twenty-five (25�) percent of the lot area shall be
landscaped and an automatic irrigation system shall be �
installed. i
i
8. A landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division
for approval prior to issuance of building permits.
Lanciscaping shall include trees, shrubs and ground cover.
Trees should be fifteen (15) gallon minimum, shrubs shall be
five (5) gallon minimum.
I
9. No principal building on the site shall exceed a height of �
thirty-five (35') feet; no accessory building shall exceed a �
height of fifteen (15') feet.
10. A six (6') foot high masonry wall shall be provided along the �
perimeter of the project site, except within the twenty foot
(20') front yard. In this frontaqe, the wall shall not I
exceed a height of 4 ft., measured from top of curb or 3 ft.,
on the driveway side, if said driveway is adjacent to the i
next property's driveway.
11. The addresses of the apartments shall be submitted to the i
Planning Division prior to occupancy.
12. Apartment numbers shall be a minimum of four (4) inches in i
height and shall be contrasting in color to the background. ,
13. The existing two-car garage and storage shed shall be
demolished; demolition permits shall be obtained from the 'I
Building Division. i
14. The parking area shall have sufficient illumination for i
security; however, all outdoor lighting shall be directed
away from adjacent streets and properties. i
V14A:Reso2234 I
2
15. A Tentative Parcel Map to combine the lots shall be filed
with the Community Development Department and approved by the
: Planning Commission. Building Permits will not be issued
prior to recordation of the Einal Map.
16. This permit shall become void ninety (90) days after the use
� permitted has been abandoned or has ceased to be actively
exercised.
17. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Bost Office (Lynwood main
office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving the
proposed development.
18. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped
and shall consist predominantly of plant materials except
for necessary walks, drives and fences.
19. A minimum of ten (10) parking spaces shall be provided.
There shall be five (5) covered and five (5) uncovered parking
spaces.
20,. Final building elevations, including materials of construction,
shall be submitted to and approved by the Building Official and
the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building
permits.
21. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer
shall pay $1.53 per square foot for residential buildings to
the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government
Code Section 53080.
22. Construction shall be completed within six (6) months from date
of issuance of building permits.
23. Prior to the installation or construction of any masonry wall,_
the property owner shall obtain a permit for and submit the
following information to the Planning Division:
a. Simple plot plan showing the location of the masonry wall
in relation to property lines, lengths, proposed materials,
, and openings or gates to provide access for vehicles and
' pedestrians.
b. For masonary walls (as defined in subsection 25-2.1) a
buildinq permit shall be applied for in addition to the
plot plan described above. All masonry walls of any height
shall need the requirements for masonry construction as
defined in Chapter 24 of the Unified Buildinq Code. A fee
� based on the valuation of the propsoed construction shall
be paid to the Building Department.
c. All masonry walls shall be required to maintain adequate
pedestrian access for the purpose of safety and
convenience. A thirty-six (36") inch or three (3') foot
clear gate or opening shall be provided to all enclosures
for pedestrian and wheelchair access. Pedestrian and
vehicular access shall be provided separately.
d. All masonry walls shall be required to be installed with a
finished, aesthetically pleasing side facing out toward
adjacent properties or the public right-of-way.
V14A•Reso2234
3
Design
24. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective material
including shingles, woodshake, asphalt composite, crushed rock
and other similar roofinq material that is not reflective,
glossy, or polished and/or roll-formed type metal roofing.
25. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of brick,
stucco, wood, metal, concrete or other similar material other
than the reflective, glossy, polished and/or roll-formed type
metal siding.
26. The two-bedroom units must be a minimum of 750 square feet.
27. All of the carport/qarage spaces shall be a minimum of 10'X20'.
28. The trash area shall be located to the rear of the property, I
and shall be enclosed by a decorative masonry wall with gates
to the standards and specifications of the Building Division.
29. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in a
consistent manner, including the incorporation within the side
and rear buildinq elevations of same or all of the design I
elements used for the primary (front) facades. I
f
Building Division I
�
30. Provide grading plan showing parkway drains (soils report i
is necessary if design is less than 1,000 lbs. sq. ft. soil
bearing pressure and if any fill is brought in to meet
grading requirements).
31. Submit plans for plan check after obtaining zoning
clearance from the Planning Division. Plans must show
laundry and trash facilities, all windows, doors and rooms, �
electrical and plumbing fixtures, notes to show concrete i
strength, desiqned handrail and treads, roofinq materials,
general framing and insulation, and venting. All stamped �
and signed by Licensed Architect or Engineer. !
32. State Energy Analysis required, Title 24. �
33. Obtain County Sanitation permit (774-1733). �
i
34. For any utilities, water, gas electrical, verify easements �
with telephone, gas, Edison and water companies. I
�
Fire Department� ;
35. Provide approved (U.L. and State Fire Marshall) smoke �
detector for each unit. i
36. Provide one (1) 2A type fire extinguisher with 75 ft. travel I
distance on each floor.
i
37. Provide 4" dry fire line to rear portion of property.
(obtain specific requirements from Lynwood Fire Department).
38. Where security gates are installed on premises, the locking I
mechanism shall be of the type that does not require a key
or any special knowledge to exit premises. Also, provide a I
Knox Box at front of property. �
V14A:Reso2234 '
4
Public Works Department
39. Provide a grading plan signed by a registered Civil
Enqineer. No qrading or building permits will be issued
until the qrading plan has been approved by,the Public Works
Department.
40. Reconstruct damaqed sidewalk per City Standards.
41. Construct curb and gutter and required adjacent asphaltic
concrete pavement along Duncan Avenue. I
42. Reconstruct damaged drive approach per City standards. j
43. Construct two (2) wheelchair ramps at northeast and �
southeast corners of Duncan Avenue and Elmwood Avenue. �
I
, 44. Remove overgrown parkway tree located in front of the i
property.
45. Plant one (1) parkway tree; species, size and location to be
determined by Department of Public Works.
46. Underground all utilities.
47. Connect to public sewer. Provide a separate lateral for new I
building. I
Section 3. A copy of this Resolution shall be delivered to the �
applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of August, 1988, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT: I
ABSTAIN:
Donald Dove, Chairperson I
I
I
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: �
I
Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes !
Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney '
�
i
I
�
V14A:Reso2234
I
5 I
� A,��NDA ITEM N0. _._L_..:"
DATE: August 9, 1988 O
��5� N0.
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas,.Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 88012
Applicant: Herbert Thomas
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to build three (3)
° two bedroom units and one four-bedroom owner's unit at 3532
Los Flores Avenue, in the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential Zone).
BACKGROUND:
On April 12, 1988, the project was reviewed by the Planning
Commission. The Commissioners agreed that:
. Sanborn Avenue is substandard in width; and there is a
need for additional guest parking spaces on tfie site.
. The high density that 5 units would present for the
site would leave little room for adequate useable open
space and parking area.
After a lengthy discussion, the Planning Commmission voted to
continue this matter to allow the applicant to develop a new plan that
addresses the above concerns. The applicant has revised his plans
to develop 4 units instead of 5 as originally planned.
FACTS
1. Source of Authority
Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that a
Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to build and/or relocate
any dwelling unit in the R-3 zone.
2. Property Location
The subject property consists of a single lot on Los Flores Blvrd.
• between California Avenue and 'Imperial Highway (See attached
Location Map).
3. Property Size
The subject is a rectangular shaped lot that is fifty (50') wide and
' one hundred and eighty (180') feet deep; the total area is
approximately 9,000 square feet.
4. Existing Land Use
The property is presently. vacant, asphalt topped lot. The
surroundinq land uses are as follows:
North - Sinqle Family Homes East - Multi-family Residential
- Multi-family Residence
South - Bank & Parking Lot West - Multi-family Residential
Disk 31:88012CUP
1
5. Land Use Description
The General Plan designation for the subject property is Multi-
Family Residential, and the zoning classification is R-3 (Multi-
Family Residential). The surrounding land uses are as follows:'
General Plan 2oning
' North - Multi-Family Residential North - R-3
South - Commercial South - C-2
East - -Multi-Family Residential East - R-3
West - Multi-Family Residential West - R-3
6. Project Characteristics:
The applicant proposes to build a two-story, four (4) unit
residential building with eight (8) covered parking spaces and two
(2) guest parking spaces.
A six (6') foot block wall is already built on the south and west
side of the property. A six (6') foot wall shall be built on' the
east side of the property except in the front yard setback area.
The total height of the development will not exceed thirty-five
(35') feet.
Site Plan Review
At its regular meeting on March 17, 1988, the Site Plan Review
Committee approved the proposed project, subject to the conditions
and requirements stated in the attached Resolution. On April 12,
1988, the Planning Commission voted to continue the project to a
allow the applicant to revise the plans to reduce the density,
provide more open space and additional parking.
2oning Enforcement History
Noiie of record.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
1. Consistency with the General Plan
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning
designation (R-3) and consistent with the General Plan designation
(Multiple Family Residential).
Site Suitability
2. The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
proposed development relative to density, structures, parking,
walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features
required by the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant lias revised his
. previous plan reducing the number of units from five (5) to four
(4) and providing up to 27$ landscaped open space. In addition, the
applicant is providing two (2) guest parking spaces, two more than
the code requires: '
Los Flores Boulevard is not a major arterial; it is substandard in
width and residents and visitors can only park on one side of the
street. Therefore, an adequate number of on-site parking spaces is
of primary importance.
DISK 31:88012CUP
2
3. Compatibility
The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of low and
medium density residential developments; therefore, the project
will be compatible with the developments in the area.
4. Compliance with Development Standards
The proposal meets the development standards required by the Zoning
ordinance with respect to side, and rear yard setbacks; distance
between structures; lot coverage; building height; and density.
5. Conditions of Approval
The improvements as proposed,. subject to the conditions recommended
by the Staff, will not have a negative effect on the values of the
surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public
health, safety or welfare.
6. Benefits to Community !
The proposed development will aid in aesthetically upgrading the I
neighborhood, if the recommended conditions of approval are adopted,
and will act as a catalyst in fostering other quality developments.
Furthermore, the development will add favorably to the City's
housing stock and will provide additional affordably-priced housing
in furtherance of the policies of the Housing Element of the General
Plan.
I
7. Environmental Assessment �
Staff has found that no substantial environmental impact will l i
result from the project; therefore a Negative Declaration has been +
prepared and is on file in the Community Development Department. I
I
i
RECOMMENDATION: �
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning �
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2182: �
1. Finding that the proposed development will not have a
, substantial effect on the environment and certify the �
' Negative Declaration as adequate. I
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 88012, subject to the ,
stated conditions and requirements. �
i
I
ATTACHMENTS: !
I
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan �
3. Resolution No. 2182 ;
i
�
I
I
�
DISK 31:88012CUP �
I
i
i
i
3 �
�
. '�\
L.00ATION iVlAP
-- ,os�°
_ � CL2ABETN __ AVENUE Q �
$� �L� / SA SO S{ SO SJ ' Jl i) JJ SG SO ' 3J fa !S /J b Jl �M)L S00
� �� � l_ � a�� w� �����I
p U \ M M � `�)� J � l� � h 4 � nJ I M I a M� M .T � . .
,� �O � S �6 f 6� c� nII9 cn M n ^� ) M l � M .
� M t � `�'�f � ' ro M'I� M `� . � � # � q� e /GVSv
,. � � � I I j i� � r 3 a i
a . � �' po
° � i , , �t _ ,o,
� h • ie,n I
� 9 � . � �a`d 1 � � � _er_ � � ..
Zi.S�1 �� �i � �` I ` � I� � ^ o '
i" �i� � 3 0 � v <6 �" c� ei eo n j� �7r n n n' r .
p9 M 0� I W" M A,�' � `�I � ( �570
_ � 1 �/ M "" "� � M A b(r ' V ro ln �� I M� m �I
� �/� � � MQ � M Ci n M I r � ^n� �"� r.v� M . M I ��� �I j tit� �. .
� M Ih M M 30 I f0 i Jf
: ant�h��Y rev � is•, e i> as» e1a� � fsco ' ..
^ N I F 0 �
h . O � O ' �'�. .
-- s et�r P 9 cb �^6 oru, w ao ?- a ��+ �. �°� � m o n (r . ry ,� � ° ,'ir o4 ea\ 11000� .
x LW.)�pp �h M MV"lfl�y � I��MIMI�( MIM M M p 1 a�/100'1 _. .
' ~ 5 6� 0 2j IS M14 M tr m ro fn /! .'( M � /S ��l I \ Q��
\ I. I� ^ I I I 1 I I IlOir �
:.� m '^ � q
Iro�3 �
. . ' i oi
. � a � � _� aa . � il l7a � odb$ .
s �
:� m I �/ //ol`� .:.i
'°➢ �io � � I(7 t � • �� i. f`'`,�r "' i� n' }i� l.�t n� � WM �ie � �u 8$'
�io 5 M, � • � I h M I M� M� m M I M � i ch I M r �" lu i I A � �/030_ .�..� �
& u �. Op +:-�. � ro lIOYO $
. �! �'1 2�. ' I Ja Sp I Sp fp Sp SO 30 63 )] a 50 CO d0 Q
� O
'� 1
u W.� o+ � ' �� o4 '�i ,.. L:ns r/oa.cs .Av. �a a ,.I
J T T e � � `- soa .ra r4y y ' � '� : n I "� '° �°`$ ". _ L?`- �. I
- y�� � q . 7 p5�' ��D n � a M� `� =°, � n �"� �'�'� ;Ilto ow:
—�:Y � $• Ep ;. } hl�9,c�' 77 ^' �� j�^' i" rv' 7 1. �' 7� m 7t ���1 ,
b s I
Q _ D � I I � �Ilu� � IiiiO _
15 �4'� ` SU 3 �A 4 � � 03 ♦ 5l I � I � � � j I � � I : ' I
h I ` �
j� � ioi '' ao s5 >> � y � i ii e i3 . zy „ j
� �iao ;
' � . e e \ e u � k,
ti e� i� � � �' '� \\ i� iao iai � iez=. ie3 i�e •
R � . �i ��n � D5 \ . 19� 9 b`'�'� a " � �O .P-u,_ e p �.Ik�i�:
_ �� ro � �. �n '^•--•
ti
�n i i�3�'� ot ioi ia as NUE�a , �� 3 00� ' �����,�` �,����� "¢ . �. '
; � � i
ti o� . p yE . • iu3� �s• R�p6 .
� 9 �' - � ,� v� I11P •� � o �.c n o ro �
�° A ' � 9t � a 5 �5 � 9 'S 33� �^+�' 4�' �. ��s� �117� . — /5e _
d li 16 U� i0 109 ICtl � ��° ` �� °. i j . j 69 /Q8 :/�7 i' 16� � � cLl8
8 0 n
I �� � � `� `p1 � 2.. I'I i7 3ro^A o � �; I i I �iiz1° Ylli:
4 U5 Il n�3 i , .. p i 9 I
Y i i3 ' L ;u �5 I � �lu. �
m i¢ n �e �
x �ou " �GN� ^ r� , J 1 iuss �/i�
r �� R.5)1j5 � � \'� N . ��d� , 7 � � '� ���� IBO / 1�12 /03 0 ���<
�:' i i0�� rl ii5. i16 �y��� ,�,3j 33 �5�5� 6 � 3 a "�,� \ ,�8,°'�. I
� L ' -�f``s�'�� v » �o w �s. �a �a � ;
R � o � \\6 ��� , �'f I 76 .:. �s . . ��.:I
� BEEGNWOOD
� M � a p w n b \\9 �V � ��1 r � � � 1 O � ' ' n _ � .
� L^ 1716 � � ii . QI\ L °j _ ; o a m m M m "' � n ro��� IUCC Ym �>.��.�
, � �n Y `� � �� tM1 � - M t10 20� 2L� 207 Z06 Z
IlL �U ' f ' g. t � R` Ui � � �. _ ."'i
t I6 � \ '�.:�1
6 37 �i�^ iu its. a� �i � N� � i .` l �s �— � � �:::,
. , � �
� M M�a t� `� p�E v a . vb i��3 �
n �, c+ u � U� t�� �� � I ��1'
ro ' � 'je \a tjD I � n�3e, - ;::.I
,nx • a � n v�o v� , t u� t g kj ��a � zq � 15� %?>�
< � ,�q; � > ' u nu ��.- l�� nji � ' 26 � m > ,�
�' tn m CZ ro l°t . .�J t o .�ly � � n.�'.� �"� a � I�?�„ �
';' t/N//.R y t� m �m� u�� so � som
147 Id8 2e1 246 t45 2U � 1 �� '� � .
! __ ��� t .p��4fl �' .+ . � i
e ' � � r`! � N�o �"' ' SANBORN � .����
�i s�� � n. � ' .
6 w n l�� � }
t "� 4 �% �� " aSL R
� ,$ - 1 59 16 � ri^
� ^� t58 � � d � cn r' I�J�'rv^ ...�
9 Ls0 251 U`7 153 i5I ISS t56 25j _ `3 � /� �y � � Zyz . j�/ UO 28r ,, ,�
. . .. , n� i�u��
_ .,�5� .��f. ./t'C+A> :� d'_ ! _'.� 2 .
:�
�
��1,�
_ 88012CUP
RESOLUTION NO. 2182
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 88012 FOR THE CON5TRUCTION OF A
- FOUR UNIT RESIDENTIAL DWELLING WITH TEN (10)
COVERED PARKING SPACES AT 3532 LOS FLORES
BOULEVARD, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, IN THE R-3
(MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE.
WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law,
conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all pertinent
testimony offered at the public hearing; and
� WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for any
development in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone'. �
Section 1. The Planninq Commissin hereby finds and determines
as follows:
' A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape
�. to accommodate the structures, parking, walls,
' landscaping, driveways and other development features
required by the Official Zoning Ordinance. ,
, B. The structures, as proposed, or modified, subject to I
, conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values
of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger '
. the public health, safety, or welfare. j
�
C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current zoning .
regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the
with the conditions of this resolution. i
D., The proposed development will aid in aesthetically ,
� upgradinq the surrounding area.
E. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not ,
adversely affect the intent of the General Plan.
' Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby i
approves Conditional Use Permit No. 88012, provided the following I
conditions are observed and complied with at all times:
Community Development Department
1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable
regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform
Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code.
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site
or structures thereon, shall be first reported to the .
Community Development Department, Planning Division, for
review of said Conditional Use Permit.
3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other
City Departments.
DISK 31:88012RES
1 .
4. The applicant shall sign a Statement of Acceptance statinq
that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to all
conditions of this resolution within fifteen (15) days
from the date of adoption of said resolution by the
Planning Commission.
Planning Division
5. The the landscaped open space areas will be a minimum of
twenty-seven (27$) percent of the lot area. In addition
provide a landscaped area around the outdoor staircase
area adjacent to the den of the front unit.
6. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in
accordance with a detailed plan to be submitted and
approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of any
building permits. '
7. A minimum of ten (10) covered spaces shall be provided for
residents including two (2) quest parking spaces. In
addition, all outdoor liqhtinq shall be directed away from
adjacent streets and properties.
8. A six (6') foot hiqh block wall shall be installed along
the perimeter of the property, except within the twenty
(20') foot frontyard setback. In this frontage, if built,
the wall shall not exceed a height of four (4') foot
measured from top of curb. ;
,
9. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet.
10. Final building elevations, including materials of �
construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the t
Building Official and the Planning Division prior to ;
issuance of any building permits. �
11. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer �
shall pay $1.53 per square foot for residential buildings '
to the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to '
Government Code Section 53080.
12. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved. All parking
spaces shall be a minimum of 9' x 18'except for those �
adjacent to poles and walls. These spaces must be a �
minimum of 10' x 20'.
13. Construction shall be completed within six (6) months from
date of issuance of building permits.
14. Prior to the installation or construction of any masonry I
wall, the property owner shall obtain a permit for and
submit the following information to the Planning Division:
a. Simple plot plan showing the location of the masonry
wall in relation to property lines, lengths, proposed
materials, and openings or gates to provide access for
vehicles and pedestrians.
b. For masonary walls (as defined in Subsection 25-2.1)
a building permit shall be applied for in addition to
the plot plan described above. All masonry walls of
any height shall need the requirements for masonry
construction as defined in Chapter 24 of the Unified
Building Code. A fee based on the valuation of the
proposed construction shall be paid to the Building
Department.
DISK 31:88012RES
2
c. All masonry walls shall be required to maintain
adequate pedestrian access for the purpose of safety
and convenience. A thirty-six (36) inch or three (3)
foot clear gate or openinq shall be provided to all
enclosures for pedestrian and wheelchair access.
Pedestrian and vehicular access shall be provided
separately.
d. All masonry walls shall be required to be installed
with a finished, aesthetically pleasing side facing
out toward adjacent properties or the public right-of- `
way.
e. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become
void one-hundred eighty (180) days after the use
permitted has been abandoned or has ceased to be
actively exercised.
15. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective .
material including shingles, woodshake, asphalt composite,
crushed rock and other similar roofing material that is
not reflective, glossy, or polished and/or roll form type
metal roofing.
16. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of
brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar
material other than the reflective, glossy, polished
and/or roll-formed type metal siding.
17. The two-bedroom units must be a minimum of 750 square feet
and the three-bedroom unit must be a minimum of 900 square
feet.
18. The applicant must submit plans showing the porch removed
or recessed into the structure outside of the front yard ,
setback area.
19. Prior to obtaininq a building permit, the design of the
exterior elevation of the building must be approved by the
Community Development Director or his or her designee.
20: Trash areas shall be enclosed by a five (5') foot high
decorative masonry walls with gates. Prior to issuing a�
building permit, the applicant must submit plans showing
the trash receptacles on the site to the satisfaction of
the Community Development Director or his or her designee.
21. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated
in a consistent manner, including the incorporation within
the side and rear building elevations of same or all of
the desiqn elements used for the primary (front) facades. ,
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the
applicant must submit plans showing the front porch
roof which should be consistent with the primary roof
deSign.
Applicant must show elevations with front dining room
windows in scale and consistent in design with the other
windows on the front facade.
22. To encourage visual interest, building elevations greater'
than 35 feet in length shall be differentiated
architecturally by recessed entries and windows, designer
windows, off-set planes and/or other architectural details
in a harmonious manner to provide dimensional relief to
the satisfaction of the Community Development Director or
his or her designee.
DISK 3.1:88012RES
3
.
23. Applicant shall contact the Post Office Department
(Lynwood main office) to establish the location of mail
boxes serving the proposed development.
24. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilating equipment,
swimming pool putnps and heaters and all other mechanical
devices shall be located within the rear yard or street
side yard of a corner lot. Such equipment shall be
screened from surrounding properties and streets and so
operated that they do not disturb the peace, quiet and
comfort of neighborinq residents, in accordance with the
City's Noise Ordinance.
25. The required front, rear and side yards shall be
landscaped and shall consist predominantly of plant
materials except for necessary walks, drives, and fences.
Fire Department
26. If security bars are placed on bedroom windows, at. least
one window for each bedroom shall have quick release
mechanisms that do not require a key or any special
knowledge (U.B.C. Section 1204). ',
27. Provide smoke detectors, (U.L. and State Fire Marshall '
approved type) in each bedroom and hallway of the proposed
apartments. '
28. Provide one (1) approved 2A type fire extinguisher
within 75 feet travel distrance on each floor.
29. Post No Parking signs in driveway to prevent obstruction.
30. One (1) fire wall between house and garage.
31. Provide an approved fire retardant roof.
32. Provide and post a"No Parking Fire Lane" sign in
driveway.
33. If security gates are installed on premises, the locking '
mechanism shall be of the type that does not require a key
or any special knowledge to exit premises. Also provide a �
knox box at entrance. ;
�
34. Provide a minimum 20 feet unobstructed driveway to the
rear of property with approved turnaround.
35. Alternate #1. Provide a 4" fireline (Obtain specific
requirements from Fire Department.) Alternate #2 -
Provide automatic fire sprinkler systems throughout units.
Public Works/Engineering Department
36. Dedicate a five foot (5') wide strip of property along '
Los Flores.
37. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered
Civil Engineer.
38. Construct curb and gutter, drive approach(es) and required I
pavement along Los Flores Blvd. +
I
�
DISK 31:88012RES �
I
(
4
39. Construct a new drive approach per City standards at Los
Flores Blvd.
40. Proposed driveway shall be realigned so that the top �X'
is located one foot inside the property line.
41. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected
separately. Construct laterals as necessary.
42. Install one 24" box street tree per City of Lynwood
standards alonq Los Flores Blvd. Species to be
Purple-Leaf Plum. A permit to install the trees is
required by the Engineerinq Department. Exact locations
of the tree will be determined at the time the permit is
issued.
43. Construct tree well covers per City standards for existing
and proposed street trees.
44. Provide and install one marbelite street pole with light
fixture, underground services and conduits along the
westerly property line.
45. Underground all utilities.
i
46. A permit from the Engineering Department is required for
all off-site improvements.
47. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or
fire protection lines shall be installed by the
developer. The work shall be performed by a licensed
contractor hired by the developer. The contractor must �
obtain a permit from the Public Works/Engineering
Department prior to performing any work.
48. Reconstruct damaged curb and gutter. �
I
i
Section 3. The Community Development Department has j
determined that the proposed four-unit apartment development in I
Case Number 88012 will not have a significant impact upon the �
environment and certifies that a Negative Declaration has been �
prepared and is hereby determined to be adequate. j
Section 4. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to �
the applicant. I
I
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of August, 1988, by I
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: �
i
I
AYES:
NOES: I
I
ABSENT: I
ABSTAIN: �
i
I
I
DISK 31:88012RE5
�
I
I
5 �
I
o , . ..
Donald Dove, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes
Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney
�
�
z
�
�
' I
i
I
I
I
I
I
�
i
I
I
DISK 31:88012RES I
i
6 �
AGENDA ITEM N0._.,��._
CASE N0. ggQ 2,�,,,,_,
August 9, 1988
TO: PLANNING COMNlISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88023
Applicant: St. Francis Medical Center ,
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to
build two medical facilities at 3630 Imperial Highway, in the
Hospital-Medical-Dental (HMD) zone.
This matter was continued from the July 12, 1988 meetinq of
the Planning Commission.
j
FACTS
Staff and the applicant have not completed reviewing the
conditions imposed and reach an agreement with the.proponent.
Therefore, additional time to assist the applicant in
resolving certain issues is needed.
I
RECOMMENDATION I
Staff respectfully request that the Planning Commission I
continued this matter to its next regular meeting on
September 13, 1988. �
�
I
�
�
I
�
�
I
�
I
�
�
�
�
Disk 31:88023 ?
�
�
1
I
i
' f aGENDA lTEM NO.�.,_..,
�
� CASE N0. _.$S�L�.;�...�
�
�
i
�
i
, August 9, 1988
�
�
� TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
f
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88030
Applicant: Louis Ross
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment to
re-designate two parcels from single-family residential and
two parcels from multiple-family residential to Commercial
in order to build a grocery store'.
The proponent is also requestinq a zone change from
residential to C-2A (Medium Commercial).
FACTS
The applicant is working with staff and the Redevelopment
Agency to present a plan which will be consistent with the
General Plan. The proponent is planning to present a.
proposal which will substantially upgrade the existinq
buildings on the site. Therefore, additional time is needed
to prepare the drawings. I
�
RECOMMENDATION �
Staff respectfully request that the Planning Commission ;
continued this matter to its next regular meeting on ,
September 13, 1988. I
�
�
j
�
I
- i
. I
I
i
I
�
i
I
I
I
1
Disk 31:88030ctd !
i
�
� �_�,._-. ..f c . .
AGENDA lTEM NO.�r.
CASE N0. _����._.. �
� DATE: August 9, 1988
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION ,
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
; Community Development Department
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 88042
Applicant(s): Jose Rodriquez/Sergio Lopez
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit,
to build four (4) apartment units at the rear of an existing
single-family home, 11230 Louise Avenue, Lynwood, CA. The total
number of units to be maintained on.the property is five (5).
- BACKGROUND
Neither the applicants nor their representative was at the . �
Planning Commission meeting of July 12, 1988; therefore, this
� matter was continued to the meeting of August 9, 1988. The public
hearing was not opened.
FACTS
1. Source of Authority
' Section 25-4.5 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a
Conditional Use Permit be obtained for any residential
development in the R-3 zone.
2. Property Location
','
, The subject property is located on the east side of Louise
Avenue between Beechwood and Sanborn Avenues (Refer to attached
Location Map).
3. Property Size
The subject site is a 200' by 60' foot lot with approximately
12,000 square feet.
4. Existing Land Use
The subject property is developed with a single-family dwelling.
The surrounding land uses are as follows:
North - Duplex East - Multiple Family
South - Single Family West - Elementary School
; 5. Land Use Description
• The General Plan designation for the subject property is Multi-
Family, while the zoning classification is high density
residential (R-3). The surrounding land use descriptions are as
follows:
DISK 30:88042CUP
1
` .
General Plan: 2oning:
North - Multi-Family North - R-3
South - Multi-Family South - R-3
East - Multi-Family East - R-3
West - Public West - P
6. Proiect Characteristics:
The proposed project calls for,the development of four {4) two- ,
bedroom, one.(1) bath units in one (1), two (2) story buildinq. .
An existing single-family home will be maintained on the parcel.
The four (4) units will be built on the second floor above
carports on the first floor. There are nine (9) carport parkinq
spaces, and one (1) open air parking space. In addition, the
proposal includes a laundry room, storage room, and tool room.
A six foot (6') block wall will be built on the perimeter of the
lot, except in the twenty-eight (28') foot front yard setback
area.
` 7. Site Plan Review
On June 16, 1988, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the
proposed development and recommended approval by the Planning
Commission, subject to specific conditions.
8. Zoning Enforcement History
None of record.
9. Public Response
A letter from the Lynwood Unified School District is
attached.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
1. Consistency with General Plan
The proposed project is consistent with the existing zoning
classification (R-3) and the General Plan designation (Multiple-
Family), as well as the intent of the General Plan. The
predominant land use in the neighborhood is single-family
residential. However, the area is undergoing a transition from
one and two single-family homes on a lot to multiple-family
developments.
To date, there are seven (7) multiple family complexes in the .
� neighborhood -.- two are occupied, three (3) are nearly compTete,
while one is currently under construction. Each project
consists of four (4) to fifteen (15) units. Because of
regulatory and economic pressures, there is evidence that land
in the subject neighborhood is actively being sought for
development. The transition from a single-family neighborhood to
` multiple-family is already established.
, Under the current Zoning Ordinance, multiple-family residential
� areas can accommodate up to eighteen (18) units per acre. For
• the subject site, this is equivalent to 5 units. With 25�
density bonus allowed by State Law, the applicant may be allowed
to build 6 units.
DISK 30:88042CUP
2
The proposal calls for the development of four (4) units in
addition to the existing single family dwelling for a total of
five (5) units on site.
2. Site Suitability
The subject property is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the proposed development, but the arrangement of the
- structures on the parcel, with the given number of units, does
not optimize the use for the open space. In addition, staff
finds that family units should have direct access to open space
areas, if pos to make visual supervision from inside the
, � units possible. Staff also finds that, to the maximum extent�
possible, there should be a separation of vehicular and
pedestrian play activity areas.
The subject site has 28.50 of the site in landscaped open space;
that is 3.5� more than required. In addition, the existing front
' yard setback area is 28 feet, only 20 feet are required.
The subject property is adequately served with the required
public utilities and offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian
accessibility. In addition, Louise Avenue is sixty (60') feet
wide, a standard width, and is sufficient for carryinq the
required traffic.volume that would be generated by the proposed
use. Louise Avenue is also sufficient width to allow parking on
both sides of the street.
� 3. Compliance with Development Standards
' The proposed development meets all the standards required by the
Zoning Ordinance regarding off-street parking; front, side and
rear yard setbacks; distance between structures; lot coverage;
building height; unit size; landscaping; and density.
4. Conditions of Approval
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions'
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a
negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or
� interfere with or endanger the public health, safety,
convenience, or welfare:
5. Benefits to Community
The proposed development, with the conditions stated in the
subject resolution, will aid in aesthetically upgrading the
. neighborhood and will act as a catalyst in fostering other
, quality developments in the area. Furthermore, the-development
will add favorably to the City's housing stock and will provide
additional affordably-priced housing in furtherance of the
policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. '
' DISK 30:88042CUP
3
6. Environmental Assessment
Staff has found that no substantial environmental impact will
result from the project; therefore, a Negative Declaration has
been prepared, and is on file in the Community Development
Department and the office of the City Clerk.
RECOI�'lENDATION •
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2202:
1. Finding ..that the proposed development will not have a
substantial effect on the environment and certify the
Negative Declaration as adequate.
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 88042, subject to the
stated conditions and requirements.
Attachments•
1. Location Map I
2. Site Plan
3. Resolution No. 2202
�
�
I
I
I
(
� I
DISK 30:88042CUP
I
�
�
4
LOCATION MAP
- ,
' , �:9,
�, � _._
-- � • -
g k � -�
n� ly
.. . � . an ' u l I ' E
. . I � , � B L.. t
_ "_'_"""'_"_ n-�3 � te
� k�1--5�r T�_�_� r 'J� ��Y� 4
�� CI@ n � Q � Q I � IS m O. i � Sr nm -n __���� �
. r � k . Y V xi� � i
:.
>-: � � z i � 1$r cp -------- �e � I o„�t o YI o a� o �
,c� m g pi � i * ia �_ IT.! t� �� : I d !I I m a,;�
��•.,��•w � '�
BEECHWOO� $ AVE � �
\� y ;. .A.�, �. „ ,,,_ � 0
.. . .... . � ` '�s � $ � k ��a O IA � y �. e ` . y °
���� � - � Y � i---'-eG_ 't �a3b�sa - ; � .
. . - Y �. '__�iY ,C 0 A A � .
. . � � ;a . a m . � i .
' �.°' / �r� �p "
, � � ' . . '_"___'___"_ ^?tiex'_____� ___' . 5� -
. � s Q i�Ai .�FT_' 8.. Z' � a9� �
' i .ww �� � � 'S.91.j0'E. .
� t . . : �
� �
.. .. Z � � 88 .I � t
.,; � —,.�..� �.��^ _.,:.,�., ' -1- �' ----
, a ....srr.;-.::.'j ---n.z R
. . �, , :o:> :::::. :.:......
I ........... ......::.
�:::::::•::•::: ........
... I . ....:: •: .. :::::..
,.� � :.;•:•:• .:..:::.:.....:::. _
. p R
.. .:.:..::::::::' _..�.. "__.Kt�_ "_
m� a � .�__-_� :�'::::<•: si �"' e
� .
.....
.. � 4 � � E�i � ��
, . g ^ ------- "==-<--�---- - -�------ 3
�� F � _�1 a V F tl -���-� .ir:!
_ ' � "' - .r<�"'
, y ' � ����_ N�
� X
y �OftS J
� � � 'i Ra �,,. R
� � � � s � i� � a t y o . .
;� __________'t___'____ �
ea �
.
� p � O iY . 0�..• � `
.. __ _'__'�?_'__ � ..,.. . . .
,.. _____"�__'___' �"
. � W �____________ •'O p �
�. . .� r 8 ! + �� . .. 0 . ez A� ------- 7r -- ' � .
� ---- "s ' a �
, D �a' __i ,H a � A;
a T� .� D .---------�r------ -;-�---�-=-=---,fl a
' . T--a+r- t p �� i � gi---T.-- C� a . o �I �b' . � ` �
; ; . . . � �"� g i i� m m ' --------"" ----- d� ----- = �
.. IO 'J✓ T.N A. �p�/1. T\ RtlN
. �C � � 'w:.. E�F A
O iC O
AVE. 8 ' ------- �y -, ' M ---- � ------ -------' .
. . . O a. ..s -
f>�DuL
: 88042CUP
RESOLUTION NO. 2202
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 88042 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR
(4) APARTMENT UNITS AT 11230 LOUISE AVENUE,
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, IN THE R-3 (MULTIPLE-
� FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject
application;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all pertinent
testimony offered at the public hearing;
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for any
'development in the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone.
Section 1: The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines
as follows:
A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape
to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping,
driveways and other development features required by the
� Official Zoning Ordinance. �
B. The structures, as proposed, or modified, subject to
conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values
, of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the
". , public health, safety, convenience or welfare.
C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current zoning
,. regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the
Site Plan Review Committee.
D. The proposed development will aid in aesthetically _
upgrading the surrounding area,
E. The granting of the Conditional Use permit will not
adversely affect the General Plan, in that the predominant
land uses in the area are high density residential.
' F. Finding that no substantial environmental impact will �
result from the proposed project, a Negative Declaration I
has been prepare@. �
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby i
approves Conditional Use Permit No. 88042, provided the following
conditions are observed and complied with at all times:
�
�
DISK 30:88042RES j
' I
�` �
Communitv Development Department
1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable
regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building
Code and the Uniform Fire Code.
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or
structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community
Development Department, Planning Division, for review of said
Conditional Use Permit. ,
3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments.
4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a Statement
of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and
agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance
, of any building permits.
Planning Division
5. This permit shall become void ninety (90) days after the use
permitted has been abandoned or has ceased to be actively
exercised.
6. The subject property shall be developed in accordance with
� apporved plans and specifications on file with the City of
Lynwood Planning and Building and Safety Divisions.
7.' The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood main
office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving the
proposed development.
8. The addresses of the apartment buildings shall be a minimum of
four. (4") inches in height, and shall be contrasting in color
to the background.
9. Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25�)
percent of the lot.area.
, 10. Landscaping and irriqation shall be installed in accordance
with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the
Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits.
il: The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped
and shall consist predominately of plant materials except
>'. for necessary walks, drives and fences.
12: A minimum of eleven (11) parking spaces�shall be provided.
There shall be five (5) covered and five (5) uncovered parking
spaces. In addition, there shall be 1 guest space on site.
13. A six (6') foot block wall shall be installed along the
perimeter of the property, except within the twenty (20') feet
front yard setback. In this frontage, if built, the wall shall
not exceed a height of four (4') foot measured from top of curb
grade level.
14. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet.
15. Final building elevations, including materials of construction,
shall be submitted to and approved by the Building Official and
the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building
permits.
DISK 30:88042RES
2
16r Before any buildinq permits shall be issued, the developer
shall pay $1.53 per square foot for residential buildings to
the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government
Code Section 53080.
17. All driveways and parking areas shall be paved.
18. Construction shall be completed within six (6) months from date
of issuance of building permits.
19. Prior to the installation or construction of any masonry wall,
the property owner shall obtain a permit for and submit the
following information to the Planning Division:
a. Simple plot plan showinq the location of the masonry wall
in relation to property lines, lengths, proposed materials,
and openings or gates to provide access for vehicles and
pedestrians.
b. For masonary walls (as defined in subsection 25-2.1) a
building permit shall be applied for in addition to the
plot plan described above. All masonry walls of any height
shall need the requirements for masonry construction as
defined in Chapter 24 of the Unified Building Code. A fee
based on the valuation of the propsoed construction shall
be paid to the Building Division.
c: All masonry walls shall be required to maintain adequate
pedestrian access for the purpose of safety and
convenience. A thirty-six (36") inch or three (3') foot I
clear gate or opening shall be provided to all enclosures
for pedestrian and wheelchair access. Pedestrian and
vehicular access shall be provided separately.
d. All masonry walls shall be required to be installed with a i
finished, aesthetically pleasing side facing out toward
adjacent properties or the public right-of-way.
e. The Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void I
ninety (90) days after the use permitted has been abandoned ,
or has ceased to be actively exercised. '
I
Desi n
20. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective material �
including shingles, woodshake, asphalt composite, crushed rock j
and other similar roofing material that is not reflective, i
glossy, or polished and/or roll-formed type metal roofing. �
21. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of brick, �
stucco, wood, metal, concrete or other similar material other ;
than the reflective, glossy, polished and/or roll-formed type
metal siding.
22. The two-bedroom units must be a minimum of 750 sguare feet. I
23. All of the carport/garage spaces shall be a minimum of 10'X20'.
24. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the street I
dedication line. i
25. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the !
exterior elevation, including the specification of color i
and materials of the buildinq must be approved by the �
Community Development Director or his/her designee. �
�
26. The trash area shall be located to the rear of the property, �
and shall be enclosed by a decorative masonry wall with gates I
to the standards and specifications of the Building Division. �
I
DISK 30:88042RES i
i
3
• 27. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in a
consistent manner, including the incorporation within the side
• and rear building elevations of same or all of the design
elements used for the primary (front) facades.
28: To encburage visual interest, building elevations greater than
thirty-five feet (35') in length shall be differentiated
architecturally by recessed entries and windows, designer
windows, off-street planes and/or other architectural details .
in a harmonious manner to provide dimensional relief to the
satisfaction of the Community Development Director or
his/her designee.
29. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally
compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent
buildings. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc. shall
be installed without the prior written approval of the
Community Development Director or his/her designee.
30. Air conditioners, heating, co,oling ventilation equipment,
swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical
devises shall belocated within the rear yard or street side
yard of a corner lot. Such equipment shall be screended from
surrounding properties and streets and so operated that they do
not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring
`, residents, in accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance.
Fire Department
31. .Provide smoke detectors for each unit.
32. Provide one {1) approved 2A type fire extinguisher within
seventy-five (75') feet travel distance on each floor.
33. Provide minimum twenty foot (20') unobstructed driveway to rear
of property with approved turn-around.
Alternative #1: Provide a minimum 150 feet four inches
(150'4") fire line. (Obtain specific
requirements from Fire'Department).
( Alternative #2: Provide automatic fire spr,inkler systems
throughout the units.
34. If security gates are installed on premises, the locking
- mechanism shall be of the type that does not require a key or
any special knowledge to exist premises. Also, provide a Knox
" box at entrance.
35. Post "No Parking" signs in driveway.
Public Works/Engineering Division
36. Provide documentation' that lots composing the property were
legally tied together to the satisfaction of the Department of
Public Works. After reviewing the documents, the Department of
" Public Works may require the submission and recordation of a
� parcel map or lot merger.
� 37. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered Civil
Engineer. Property is located within 100 year flood zone area.
Pad elevations shall be 1 foot above level zone per flood
boundary map. Also conform to all applicable codes per Section
12 and 1/2 of Lynwood Municipal Code. Building above flood
, level will require substantial amount of fill, therefore,
' suggest alternative methods of design to minimize amount of
livable space at ground level.
DISK 30:88042RES
4 '
38. Construct full width sidewalk in parkway.
39. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected
separately. Construct laterals as necessary.
,
40. Install 4 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood standards
along Louise Avenue; three to be planted in existing tree
wells on west side of Louise Avenue. The fourth tree will be
planted in parkway. Species to be Jacaranda. A permit to
' install the trees is required by the Engineering Division.
" Exact locations of the trees will be determined at the time the
permit is issued. .
91. Construct tree well covers per City of Lynwood standards for
existing and proposed street trees.
42. Underground all utilities.
43. Underground existing utilities if any modifications are
proposed for the electrical service panel.
44. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all off-
site improvements. •
45. All required water meters, meter service chagnes and/or fire
protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The work
shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the
developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the Public
Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any work.'
Section 3. A copy of this Resolution shall be delivered to the
applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of August, 1988, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
' AYES: '
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Donald Dove, Chairperson
' APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes
Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney �,
DISK 30:88042RES
5
�. ; , `...:
� a � U a � LYNWOOD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
* * I1JJ1 PLAZA
•sr. �sw ��VONEIA C. STEELE, EE.O., SUPERINTENOENT OF SCHOOLS '
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90Y6P
(21�) GOa�0010
Maria-Elena Romero
FACILITIES PLANNER
_: June 2, 7988 CORRECTED COPY ,.
Mr. Kenrick R. Karefa-Johnson ,j;fi; i.; ,����:,.
,
Interim Director '
Community Development Department
City of Lynwood " '
77330 Builis Road �'�.`�::': ' `=.' `" '''
Lynwood, CA 90262 1 ,
RE: Potential Impact of Proposed Development on Public School
System Case No. 88042
Dear Mr. Karefa-Johnson: ' �
Please be advised that the Lynwood Unified School District has
received notice of the above application for the proposed residential
development, to be located at'11230 Louise Avenue.
The proposed development is located in the Will Rogers School
Attendance Area. This school is currently overcrowded and aithough
portable classrooms are being used to help alleviate the problem, the
- long range solution to the overcrowded conditions requires the
constructfon of several new schools. This long range solution will
take three to five years.
In addition, any, proposed new enrollees due to this, residential project
wili be attending Hosler Junior High School and Lynwood �High School,
both of which are also experiencing severe overcrowded conditions.
The impact of this development to our enrollment may be as follows:
Primary: 0.6 Yield Factor x 4 units = 2.4 new students
- Secondary: 0.3 Yield Factor x 4 units = 1.2 new students
,
If you require any further information, please feel free to contact us.
Very tru yo
MAR ROMERO
Fa it' s anner
bm
cc: Dr. LaVoneia C. Steele, Superintendent
Ciifford A. Kach, Asst. Supt.; Bus. Serv.
�.
'.�.�..�... _
'"� AGENDA ITEM NO.�.,
CaS� N�. �SQ`f-�._.
DATE: August 9, 1988
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map No. 19788 - Case No. 88044
Applicant: Gary Harre
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting a Tentative Parcel Map approval for the
purpose of consolidating five (5) lots into two lots in order to build
a two (2) unit and four (4) unit apartment development at 2975-77
Fernwood Avenue, Lynwood, CA.
BACKGROUND
On July 14, 1981, the Planninq Commission approved a request for a
Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Parcel Map for construction of
six (6) apartment units at 2975-77 Fernwood Avenue. The applicant
� completed the foundations for the buildings and built 14 carports with
permits issued by the Building Division. However, the project was not
completed and the previously approved Tentative Parcel Map expired. j
A Variance of the lot depth was also approved by the Planning
Commission in 1981; Nevertheless, it, too, had lapsed. �
On April 14, 1987, the Planning Commission approved new applications �
for a Conditional Use Permit and Variance under Resolution Nos. 2096 �
and 2095, respectively.
The applicant is proposing a new application for a Tentative Parcel +
Map approval. a
;
1. Source of Authority �
Section 25-18, et seq., Subdivision Regulations of the Lynwood i
Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act, Government Code i
Section 66410, et seq. �
i
2. Property Location i
The subject site is an interior lot located between State Street
1
and Beechwood Avenue, along Fernwood Avenue (See attached Location
Map).
3. Property Size �
The subject site consists of five (5) lots with a total area of �
15,240 square feet. i
4. Existing Land Use
North - Multiple Family Residential
South - I-105 Century Freeway
East - Multiple Family Residential/Town Center
West - Multiple Family Residential
DISK 30:88044TPM
I
1
�
�
� �
�
_ o
5. Land Use Designation
The General Plan designation for the subject site is Multiple
Family Residential, and the zoning classification is R-3 (Multiple
Family Residential). The surrounding land uses are as follows:
General Plan: Zoning:
North - Multiple Family North - R-3
South - Freeway/Townhouse & Cluster South - R-3
East - Multiple Family/Commercial East - R-3 & CB-1
West - Industrial West - Manufacturing
6. Proiect Characteristics
The applicant proposes to merge five (5) existing lots into two
(2) lots in order to complete the development. The carports
have been built as well as the foundation system for the six,
three-bedroom units.
7. Site Plan Review
At its regular meeting on July 13, 1988, the Site Plan Review
Committee approved the proposed Tentative Parcel Map with
conditions imposed.
8. Zoninq Enforcement History
• None of record.
9. Public Response
None at the time the agenda was prepared. �
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS I
1. CoiZSistencv with General Plan �
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing Zoning I
designation (R-3) and consistent with the General Plan designation
(Multiple Family Housing).
2. Site Suitability i
The property is adequate in size and shape to accomodate the �,
proposed development relative to structures, parking, walls, !
fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features �
required by the Zoning Ordinance. �
3. Compatibility �
The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of high and i
medium density residential developments; therefore, the project
will be compatible with the development in the area. ;
4. Compliance with Development Standards I
f
The proposal does meet the development standards required by the �
Zoning Ordinance with respect to front, side, and rear yard i
setbacks; distance between structures; lot coverage; building
height; and density. '
I
DISK 30:88044TPM �
�
Z i
5. Conditions of Approval
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a
negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or
interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare.
6. Benefits-to Community
The development will eliminate the potential problems associated
with vacant lots and carry out the goals of the Housing Element of
the General Plan.
7. Environmental Assessment
This development is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines, as amended (Section 15061, (b)(3). �
RECOMMENDATION: i
I
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning ;
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2205:
a. Finding that Tentative Parcel Map No. 19788, Case No. 88044 �
is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, I
as amended. �
b. Approving Tentative Map Case No. 88044, subject to the stated �
conditions and requirements.
Attachments• �
. '
1. Location Map �
2. Tentative parcel Map
3. Resolution No. 2205
�
I
'
I
�
i
�
i
I
I
DISK 30:88044TPM
�i
�
3 ,
— _.. �
LOCATION MAP
��•�•�•�-�-�•�•��•�•�•�-�•�•���•�•�-�•���� Ya99�� us f,�j' � 9
�
$ IMPERIAL HWY ��
�
�n . o uc � su � ,
� I
7 6� U Lz 6t tf 6� 7 6d f 70 7/ 7J 74 75 7[ 77 7t 7f np � , •. °'3 I
t .- i Q
.s . ? I
. � I
. . � � � Q• 6 �
v 3z i zs Zr n zs zs u u si a� i9 ie /7 /i /S K/J /1 // . �� '� `:: �� 147 i
• 8
4 � " � � = 1114 9 �
io
� 1119 �� � ;
,.BEECHWO D AVE y � !
.u.c
`� �w �f a p� � fo � JJ ` .Q7/ . I
z � � .�� � � �' � � +"., a ` '�' t ' �' � jOn,`° ;
/ h � I
'd .r � ,�n iy za 2j . . �, Z a �u �. na
F , y � q,�, zp �� z+ z� 4� a �)• Q 18
F O ., �� �� � �' S! a/y 0 '�IaiD 6 I
qe,� o'� is i':'i� >'r:;?:' 6 ;
/4� w .A,K.�j�; . 1$
�YT a° , .•. 'z �. . � a� . 51 ' � 3192q �
�
`." g • � �Z9
; 9 M
� ' a , " .'�aa n
�'• F FRN �lra3/ �" o •/�s ��
'�� t. � �io
� � , � � 1— 9`F ,p a� - iy !
. !� , � • , ,�' i
i /
� � � , � ' '� B
�' '� 3 ` " � /�
/ 'y � 3j '� IZ �s q /3j e3 i
. . J ;� � �F
,
<
� y� � , � � / � � �/Ye� �i �� � I
0
s
��� " - w '��K�q�i � ' .� I
� ! , rs � � M1 Jle
��d � � � � � �„ �� I : �
z> > y �� •/i � ; s a � ' 1 �
. r� , �
. :s r� $ .
'�YdGrs. �// / . ' f a � //yo��
/Iy�i4 ie . � � /i . � , I
• • se
rJ �� . ' Y7_ 3 A ` � �• � � I � � i
� y3 i . �2 i . .� . _ i _ . . ... . '� _ �� �1 i
i
I
�
I
' I
i
�'�D �f � I
• 88044
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
CITY OF LYNWOOD
� DATE; July 29, 1988
County Clerk
Corporation Division, Room 106
Post Office Box 151
Los Angeles, California 90053
RE: NEGATIVE DECLARATION '
FOR TPM, CUP 88044
(Project Name)
i
Gentlemen:
Application has been filed with the City of Lynwood for approval of the project
known as 'TPM, CUP 88044
to be located a tZ9� 5 Fernwood
Lynwood, CA. and to be ,implemented by Gary Harre
The project is briefly described as:
Tentative Parcel Map to merge five (5) existing lots into two (2)
lots and a Conditional Use Permit to construct a two (2) unit and
a four (4) unit apartment house at 2975 Fernwood Avenue, Lynwood
in the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone.
In accordance with the,authority and criteria contained in the California
Environmental Quality Act, State Guidelines, and the City of Lynwood 6uidelines
for the implementation'of the California Environmental Quality Act, tlie Department
of Community Development of the City of Lynwood analyzed the project and determined
that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment. Based
on this finding, the Department prepared and hereby filed this NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
A period of ten (10) working days'from the date of filing of this NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be provided to enaUle public review of the project specifications
and this document prior to action on the project by the City of Lynwood. A copy
of the project specifications is on file in the offices of the Department of
Community Development, City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California.
This document is being filed in duplicate. Please acknowledge filing date and ':
return the acknowledge copy in the enclosed stamped, self-addressed envelope.
/ � �.
Prepar�d and filed by: ^ ;;
� � `,,.
i J �
The epartment,,� Co i �Developm t �;
' : `, �,
BY: ✓
%�. �' /' � r -;'
DireEtor or" Aut� ' ed Rep esent`ative -{
�i
Art Barfield �;
Planning.Technicia
Y.
�{
�
(:1
a
I
'
1
I
' 88044TPM
RESOLUTZON NO. 2205
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
NO. 19788 TO COMBINE LOTS 11, 12, AND 13 INTO
LOT 1 AND LOT 14 AND 15 INTO LOT 2 AT 2975-77
FERNWOO.D AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF LYNtJOOD, COUNTY
OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED
IN BOOK 9, PAGE 142 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, pursuant
to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered all
pertinent testimony offered in the case as presented at the public
hearing; and
WHEREAS, the preparation, filing and recordation of a Parcel Map
is required for the proposed commercial development; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has determined that
the proposed project is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines, as amended, Section 15061 (b)(3).
Section 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find and '
determine that said Tentative Parcel Map No. 19843 should be approved
for the following reasons:
A. The combination of lots meets all the applicable reguirements i
and conditions imposed by the State Subdivision Map Act and �
the Subdivision Regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code.
I
B. The proposed combination of lots is consistent with the �
applicable elements of the General Plan and the Official I
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lynwood. �
C. Proper and reasonable provisions have been made for adeuqate I
ingress and egress to the lots being combined.
D. Proper and adeuqate provisions have been made for all public
utilities and public services, including sewers.
E. The project could not have a significant effect on the
environment, and a Negative Declaration has been prepared in
accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended
(Section 15073).
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of,Lynwood hereby
approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 19788 in the R-3 (Multiple-Family
Residential) 2one, subject to the followinq conditions:
DISK 30:88044RES
Communitv Development Department
1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable
regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building
Code and the Uniform Fire Code.
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or
strucutes thereon, shall be first reported to the Community
' Development Department, Planning Division, for review of said
Conditional Use Permit.
. 3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments. ,
4. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement of
Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and agrees
to the conditions of this resolution before issuance of any
' building permits within fifteen (15) days from the date of
approval of said resolution by the Planning Commission.
, Planning Division
5, Within twenty-four (24) months after approval of the Tentative
Parcel Map, the subdivider shall file with the City of Lynwood, a
final parcel map in substantial conformance with the Tentative
Parcel Map as approved or conditionally approved, and in
° conformance. with the Subdivision Map Act and the Sibdivision
Regulations of the City of Lynwood.
6. Prior to the expiration of the Tentative Parcel Map, the
subdivider may file an application with the Community Development
, ' Department for Planning Commission action on an extension of the
expiration period.
7. The final parcel map should be filed with the City Engineer of
the City of Lynwood.
8. No grading or building permits shall be issued until the parcel
map has been recorded in the Office of the Los Angeles County
Recorder.
Engineerina/PUblic Works Conditions
9. All conditions of the 5tate Map Act and the City's subdivision
Ordinance must be met prior to recordation. � I
I
All matters and improvements shall be consistent with the
° ordinances, standards, and procedures of the City's Development i
Standards, Engineering Procedures and Standards, Water
Standards, and Planting Standards of the Department of Parks ��
and Recreation. ,
The Developer is responsible for' checking with staff for
clarification.of these requirements. ' ,I
� 10. Submit a Subdivision Guarantee to this office. +
The final map shall be based on a field survey. All surveying
for the proposed development will be done by the Developer,
including the establishment of centerline ties. Enclose with
the final map the surveyor's closure sheets. i
11. D eveloper shall pay all a pplicable development fees including
drainaae sewer water and parkwav trees prior to issuance of
; anv buildina permits.
Pav Parcel Map checkina fees prior to checking. i
DISK 3-0:88044RES I
, ,
� �
Pav $100.00 monument checking fee prior to recordation. Deposit
$50.00 with City Engineer to guarantee receipt by City of
recorded reoroducible mvlar, parcel map prior to recordation.
All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees
are to be paid prior to recording the final map. All
requirements to the serving utilities to be met or guarantee
prior to recording of the final map.
12. Grading and Draining
A grading plan signed by a registered Civil Engineer shall be
submitted for approval of the Director of Public Works/City
Engineer and the Director of Community Development. The
grading plan shall include the topography of all contiguous
properties and streets and shall provide for the methods of
drainaqe in accordance with all applicable City standards.
Retaining walls and other protective measures may be required. I
Offsite drainage easements may be necessary. The structural
section of all parking areas shall be designed by a Civil
Engineer based upon soils analysis supplied by a recognized and
approved soils engineering firm. The structural section of all
parking areas shall be designed by a Civil Engineer based upon
soils analysis supplied by a recognized and approved soils I
engineering firm. The structural section shall be approved by
the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. In the event that I
the design is not provided, the minimum structural section
shall be approved by the Director of Public Works/City I
Engineer. In the event that the design is not provided, the �
minimum structural section that will be approved by the �
Director of Public Works/City Engineer. In the event that the i
design is not provided, the minimum structural section that ;
will be approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer I
would be 2 inches of asphalt on 4 inches on untreated rock ;
base.
I
Submit to this office a Geologic/Soils Report signed by a ��
Registered Soils Engineer. �
13. Sewers
The development shall be provided with public sewers. Connect (
to public sewer. Provide laterals as necessary. Design of all �
sanitary sewers shall be approved by the Director of public i
Works/City Engineer.
14. Water Systems
i
The Developer shall construct a water system including water
services, fire hydrants and appurtenances through the
development as required by the Director of Public Works/City
Engineer. The Developer shall submit a water system plan to
the City of Lynwood Fire Department for fire hydrant locations. �
The City will install water meters only. Payment for said
meters shall be made to the City prior to issuance of building !
permits. The Developer shall install meters and fire hydrants �
on interior and on boundary arterial streets. �
All conditions of the Lynwood Fire Department must be met prior �
to recordation.
15. Public Easements and Right of Way I
Where drainage, sewer and other such easements are required, i
the minimum easement width shall be ten (10) feet to facilitate
maintenance unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public
Works/City Engineer. �
I
DISK 30:88044RE5 �
i
'
I
Dedicate a five {5) foot wide strip of property along Fernwood
Avenue.
16. Sidewalks
Design, configuration and locations shall be subject to the
approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, and the
� Director of Community Development. Ramps for physically
handicapped persons shall be provided both on-site and off-
site as required by State and local regulations.
17. Dust Control and Pedestrian Safety
Prior to the issuance of demolition or grading permits, the
developer shall:
a. Submit a plan indicating safety methods to be provided to�
maintain safe pedestrian ways around all areas of
: construction. This may require proper and adequate signs,
fences, barricades, or other approved control devices as
required by the Director of Community Development.
18. The Developer shall install all public improvements, as'.
- required by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer prior to
issuance of anv occupancy permits for this development. Public.
Improvements shall include but are not limited to:
a. Reconstruction of PCC sidewalk along Fernwood Avenue.
"" . b. Reconstruction of PCC curb and gutter along Fernwood'
Avenue.
c. Underground all utilities.
All changes and repairs in existing curbs, gutters, and'
sidewalks and other public improvements shall be paid for by
the developer. If improvements are to be guaranteed, a
faithful performance bond shall be posted by the developer to
guarantee installation of sai@ public improvements and an
agreement for completion of improvements with the City Council
shall be entered into. Submit Policy of Insurance or bond
protecting City against damage or injury to persons or property
growing out of, related to, or resulting from improvements or
work. The Director of Public Works/City Engineer will
determine amount and form. Deposit with the Director of Public
Works/City Engineer before commencing any improvements, a sum
estimated by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to
cover dost of inspection of all improvements under his
' jurisdiction.
Section 3. The Community Development Department has determined
that the proposed project is categorically exempt from the
provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended.
Section 4. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the
applicant.
DISK 30:88044RES
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of August, 1988, by members
of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
� AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Donald Dove, Chairman
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes
Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney
DISK 30:88044RES
. _ . � ,
;.
;
.: _
;
� � �
; �
�
.._..._._ i
,. _ _ � ..�.__ . _ ._ ._.___.
- �.r ._... :_� � _ . _ _.:
_ .. ��
� � b �
;
{ �9: i P� �'. ;�" � i � y��:..p'�'> '� � l ',fY t , . ... .. fn� ; �'l. .
�� �:,` �p:o ��' S:�> . , ,�-.� 7. �, ` -r�. /�- .
a�HCHwaRrc LEGAL DESCRIPTION ` �'����
ZONING
� TBM. -TOP OF FIRE MYDRANT� .- � a-a zo,ui,o� Or�^ic'r ��
, � N.E•CORNER STATE.6.FERNWOOD ..BEING AfSUBDI'JISION OF �OTS i1,12,.13,14 AND � �
" ELEV.�:� 100.00 , I5, BLOCK:6, OF. MODJESKA �PARK,AS RECORDED -
" � NUMBER� OF �0T5: 2� � IN BOOK 9, PAGES i42 TO 143 OF MAFS, LOT SIZES ��
�, AREA: GROSS -O.J48 ACRES RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. LOT �= O.Z/7AC�PES
� � . LO T 2- O. /3i AC,PES
PROPERTY ADDRESS � Qjyjy�� GIN�ER �
. . ' zfl7S-fs GE.r.N(�G�N .o4E GAKY HF.P.FE -
6/L6EQ'T E.t(;iNFE.P/NG
. L✓NWq'Jp. GAUlO,F.WA ' . G/ BEL,NO,VT S/ �VS2 L/.uCCL.0 Al�E �PO/ �
; . � LO.UD CEFlJ/ GqU.'G/',t/iq CYV � 5�.. CFUFO,F'//iA 90tr.:0
� 94'C3 . 7/ G/_�-CC,'-G/9G
� � � / /exisriNCi cvrsFb,ars �
� � : � �I , . I i / I � —_ _ � .
, . i�F:4 I � ( i . � .. � � � . I .. ' . . .
.. . ✓ FiC36]AE(/ LK'PFG.TFC.I � , / I . �..
� � f> Pft'B�Z9914-9GR/ . /�.`� I I �� � I ' EqSE.�nC.STOFSO.lN( (p/SO.f/ �
'. . � . ___ . "" 899� Y^�' � r � � 4.99 . � " _� am,B �
. - P'� i ..__ ye � ""` °� — .
. . � . . N�.__.__�! . "�, ' .
� i i ' — I ;
. . , � � ' � i �y : , �
.. �. � , �— �--=--- ----- � .
' . c5��� �� _'_' .
' �t»o� � . I .
. . .. ..» � ..
'
. i , rn y j _., ;
��.� r �,,. N rr �r �t ��_�" .,� °
� ' ;', r !u �. � � ���,. 1 .�ie � a i� . ii � "
Y � � I p -I' I \
+ ` , � - �/� + —��� Il� �� II' ' II': �"V'� i \�. li oe�l _ I � . � ( y ' .'f��
. . ' :'_ ' • : _ .. ;n � ' �' ._i� ��
—�. -J� . �I �� _.. : �� i� �� j� �:.__ �_ . V
* i� ii i r 1 �i u i� �i
.. � JL ��• � ji_ J� JI. Ji__J I . .
' � ivfi "�v b . �. � p,
' . �N� , ��..e� " �� _-_-__ '__._ � ' .
, r,:
. � � , E456NEA//' OF SO. CFL.
� '+0.si I a , . FOGS9.V PFX CK 3G/49-2 O.P . _
p I�..
. � _ ^� . •l_ � . � I I I .
_. v �_ � � _ � 1
>�
ry — F ERNWpp� —�_--=� ���`._
� . . �CURb � �. AV� I -� ' Fy .. �, _
' . . . . . /i�GUTTFR ____ \ � � . �'.
I
. 4�0 S �e� RKW �, '
' /.LIV F•PiFly �� 4 � K �Up .
�
. . 6FE�'N �i '-- � �.
kq00 902r � ..
sirE- �
5 4• 2-� �
� � o �
y� � b �' : �NTATIVE PARCFL MAP N0. 197 &'; '
� IN THE CITY OF LYNWOOQ ;
�r COUNTY OF LOS ANGEL£�;;.;
� ' , -:� � STATE OF CALIFORNI� :
� {�/C/�C//lY N/lf�� . �'' --�— --T .--
�----°� ..
� --- . <
G.S �
y ,��%-, `�
:"s . �
s:
.., -
�-. ,
�: � � AGENDA ITEM NO..�..._._�..
DATE: August 9, 1988 CASE N0 .
TO: PLANNING COMMIS5ION
EROM: Vicente L. Mas; Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case.No. 88047
Applicant: Usbaldo Olivas
2123 W. 146th Street
Gardena, CA. 90249
Proposalc
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a
five {5) unit apartment building at 11218 Louise Avenue, Lynwood.
Currently, the property is developed with a single-family dwelling.
' � Facts
1. Source of AuthoritY
Section 25-4.2.A of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a
Conditional Use Permit be obtained for any residential
' � development in the R-3 zone.
2. Property Size:
_ The site consists of a rectangular lot of approximately 11,000 �
, square feet (55' X 200'). i
�
� 3. Existing Land Use:
The site is presently occupied by a single-family house and a �
defached garage. The surrounding land uses are as follows: I
i
North - Residential East - Residential �
South - Residential West - School '
Y
4. Land Use Designation: �
j
•The� General Plan designation for the subject property is �
' Multiple-Family, while the zoning description is R-3. The I
surrounding land use designations are as followsc -�
�
General Plan 2oning �
. North - Multiple-Family North - R-3 I
South - Multiple-Family South - R-3 �
, East - Multiple-Family East - R-3 I
West - Multiple-Family West -.R-3 '
a
i
� �i
i
I
DISK V12:88047CUP
�
1
i
�
E
5. Project Characteristics:-
The property is currently developed with a single-family
dwelling which occupies approximately one-sixth of the site.
' The applicant proposes to demolish the singZe-family dwelling
and construct a five-unit apartment building consisting of five -
(5), two-bedroom units at 832 square feet each. Said units
would be constructed over enclosed parking for the units.
Ten (10) parking spaces will be provided in garages beneath the
proposed units in conformance to code.
The proposed development is based on the basic density only, ,
without the application of a density bonus. �
The total height of the buildings shall not exceed thirty-five
� (35') feet.
6. Site Plan Review
On July 13; 1988, the Site,Plan Review Committee evaluated the
proposed, development and recommended approval by the Planning
� Commission; subject to specific conditions and requirements.
, 7. Zoning Enforcement History:
None of record.
8. Public Response:
A letter from the Lynwood Unified School .DistYict is
attached. '
. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
1. Consistency with General Plan:
The propo5ed land use is consistent with the existing zoning
classification (R-3) and the General Plan designation (Multiple-
Family Housing). Therefore, granting Conditional Use Permit No.
88047 will not adversely aEfect the General Plan.
2. Site SuitabilitY:
' The subject property is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the proposed development relative to the proposed '
density,"bulk of the structures, parking, wall fences, driveways
and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance.
Furthermore, the subject property is adequately served with the
required public utilities and offers adequate vehicular and .
pedestrian accessibility.
3. Compliance with Development Standards:
The proposed development meets all the development standards
required by the 2oning Ordinance regarding off-street parkinq;
' front, side, and rear yard setbacks; lot coverage, height, unit
�- size; and density.
DISK V12:88047CUP
, 4. Compatibility:
The� proposed project is surrounded by single-story, lower-
density residential developments and, therefore, will not be
compatible with the character of the neighborhood. However, the
development will be consistent with the zoning classification
of the area (R-3) and will be compatible with the General Plan
designation of Multiple-Family Residential.
5. Conditions of Approval:
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a
negative effect on the values of the surrounding jproperties or
interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare.
6. Benefits to Community:
The proposed development will aid to aesthetically upgrade the
neighborhood and will act as a catalyst to foster other quality
developments. Moreover, the development will add favorably to
the City's housing stock in furtherance of the policies of the
Housing Element of the General Plan.
7. Environmental Assessment
� The proposed project could not have a siqnificant effect on the
environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared.
RECOMMENDATION •
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2206:
1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, No. 88047, will
not have a significant effect on the environment, and
certify the Negative Declaration as adequate.
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 88047, subject
, to the stated conditions and requirements.
Attachments
1. Location Map
2.' Site Plan '
3. Resolution No. 2206
� DISK V12:88047CUP
, �!
. �
..
I . -.
,,
DA1'A SHEE1" TWO
LOCATION MAP
. � --- --__ - _ __
o � � . /' � M , "_�."__ ~ — _..
; � `^ ° � . $ 0 71— — — — �.,_ar .
� � : M , /� ���.o h � ,,..e I� ,,,d,� .
_ h `�
` s�
. 1 /O li i � p 0 � Pisa I � b ,
� u c h p � .�� D W. ___ _ �/. ___d � fUse
- '� ; O �. ^ � � ,,, s_ �p III'� Q ti
° // �� � V " . Q v �,�w � ��
. . ' 1 W a � ...o � iot � �3 .9`
� / II � '' � /6� s $ g— -�-'= — � ����9 0
- '� o� �so raTSO ir �,� o
) � 8 � � �6 I
�J` I �' q I vhni . _ r �
°� � m �s : —. a��.,� wl �,�� a x �
�� '� V �� o l �" ,°� 1 e� M�� _ �^ 69 I. .. o I T ti e ��
h � i^ y
tlf,'O/�.. ,� I� Ili�> J� L ��i�� ` u� I N � rv ��wl � �J�,J f0 (�ioo .�
y C y
r N � ��.
° �S ° A✓E. ----O
� �; ,r. I�Z=° ^ �0
. z�a,�«�co ,.ea� � a a r.; uf .i�2.�f o lf� ;o- .) 55 �� `�
� � J, b. �� 1� �," .�}� � � I CJ.Z/s � 4. , �
�.'• �.. . ,s! /I � �^ � �I;oo `, /Gb L /a/.GV• �
W �_—_
�� IGf .I � i�:oB �1 I �.:o� e O�
. . Z � •, I b �� t4 b . /IO � 6LL16 10LQ4 0 ^� :. �
, � u:.. ` �,�,o ° � `'
i .
� ,,z�� o
j ' � � �
" � � ' �J i� �„ o -::^-.,--., .— °". �--- — — — — —
a �0 b 't;� ° .
� u:�. >';ht::;>;>:r,�:._:.;;.::.: � 11_. �Q
'�1:.?�76:� :: - i17a.ASt I
' � 1 ilaa.
` S i . Q . � /7 � ::> .�.2Zd :�>:� � � /f0 �.C2� ` s p•f �
rf V � ��( � S�
: ' ^
t � , .. I i3 O u il5/.� _ fC]L _�_
. . 5 ti � . u . � b — zcr�n - � � 70467 O
. �tie �� �. .. 6 ��ti� - i I.�x:9T �
—�� —L--�- .10o IO/,3S � w
.4a]] `'
�;: 6 �, t Q �s ,.�,: o — -- — --
- u. � U �h:n ' b O :00.67 � IJO.GZ .n o
ii:� zoosi 6� p � ���
. 7i'� ° /1 � o — �
. . - .l b _ _ ' b p .. �n C00.9Q ux,. �
� � t i. p � � � O � ., o
.� d; F v, /! 9 �, � _ iso � 64 zso. �z _ ° � � , , .
, , � ,,,,e —r-------" o
— - �
i!J '� 4' y b — — �2 ..>sD r /SO .�:52 � _'_ �nzi * . I I
.. . . o _ - s` I IS0.3/ o a:� � g � .
. �.: �O' ° ~ ". �� ii�»y \_ /SO _L 6'j 749J0 � � � p 5 � -
� `�
.• /� `� a' _ _ '.'.ii. 399.6J C�Ty �°
n��: � �« s _,�3 a
e Y � ? e o �..,4 61 �— ,.:�,'e
r I � A svTioT.m - T - — ` rsa �
.:. i � a —�-----L—==- z�a
� � I � ��:..v _w .�avi !9).SS up a / �
� ' � � � :, I: 3 � .,�,r r �.T —�Y- '_,,. _6/ _ ,�:,� 5,^� / �
" L4s.0� " ^ Id.!1 � ` p � �. I 2c�oos D ,
„�,9 i P
AVE. $ T__ . �
'C ii3o� p „�
.. « s....i �._.. i .. � � ♦ u .
�
C.U.P. $�04� NORTH
Lynwood Planning Commission
August .9,1988
" 88047CUP
, RESOLUTION NO. 2206
' A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CONIInISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL . USE
PERMIT NO. 88047 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO
' (2) STORY, FIVE (5) UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING AT
11218 lOUISE AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, IN
THE R-3 (MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE.
WHEREAS, The Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to.law,
conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all pertinent
testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for development
in the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone.
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines as follows:
A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape
to accommodate the structures, parking, walls,
landscaping, driveways and other development features
required by the Official Zoninq Ordinance.
B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, will ,
not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding
properties or interfere with or endanger the public
health, safety, or welfare.
C. The site will be developed pursuant to the currenE zoning ,
regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the
Site Plan Review Committee.
D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not
adversely affect the General Plan.
Section 2. The Planninq Commission of the City of Lynwood
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby
approves Conditional Use Permit No. 88047, provided the following
conditions,are observed and complied with at all times:
, DISK V12:88047RES
1
� T7. Buildinq fees of $1.53 per square foot must be paid to the
Lynwood Unified School District before any building permits
are issued.
Fire Department
18. Provide approved smoke detectors for each unit.
19. Provide approved portable fire extinquisher within 75 feet
travel distance.
20. If security bars are placed on bedroom windows, they shall
' meet requirements of the U.B.C. Section 1204.
'. 21. Where security gates are installed on premises, the locking
mechanism shall be of the type that does not require a key or
any special knowledge to exit premises.
22. Provide knox box at entrance, contact Bureau of Fire Pre-
vention for information.
Public Works/Enqineering Division
23. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a reqistered
Civil Enqineer. Grading plan will be checked by Public Works
Department. No building permits will be issued prior to the
approval of qrading plan by City Engineer.
24. Property is located within 100 year flood zone area. Pad
elevations shall be 1 foot above flood level zone per flood
boundary map. Also conform to all applicable codes per
section 12-1/2 of Lynwood Municipal Code. Buildinq above
flood level will require substantial amount of fill,
therefore, suggest alternative methods of design to minimize
amount of livable space at qround level.
; 25. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk along Louise Avenue.
26. Construct 24" wide gutter and asphalt pavement along property
` frontage on Louise Avenue.
� 27. Construct a new drive approach per City standards .
4
; 28. Close existing driye approach and construct proposed drive
, approach(es) per City standards.
29. Connect to.public sewer. Each building shall be connected
� separately. Construct laterals as necessary.
i 30. Install three (3) 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood
` standards along Louise Avenue. Two to be located on west side
of Louise Avenue. Species to be Crape Myrtle. A permit to .
install the trees is required by the Engineering Division.
Exact locations of the trees will be determined at the time
the permit is issued.
31. Provide and install one marbelite street pole with light
fixture, underground services and conduits on Louise Avenue,
location to be determined by the Public Works Department.
37. Underground a11 utilities. .
33. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all
. off-site improvements.
DISK V12:88047RES
3
��34. All required water meters, meter service chanqes and/or fire
protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The
' work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the
developer_ The contractor must obtain a permit from the
, . Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any
work.
' 35. Proposed driveway is too close to the existing driveway on
adjacent lot on north side of property. Proposed driveway
should not conflict with existing driveway. 5how the existing
driveway and the proposed driveway.
Section 3_ The Community Development Department has
determined that the proposed project will not have a significant
effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been
prepared.
Section 4. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to
the applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of August, 1988, by members
of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
' Donald Dove, Chairman
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes
Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney
DISK V12:88047RE5
4
,.
� • JJ .:\ 9\eV SGi� •
` 'N
8 . a� LYNWOOD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
* <s,.,o� *
LeVONEIA C. STEELE, EE.O., SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS ����� P
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90202
MAqIA�ELENA pOMEFO 1z13) B034a05
FAdLITES PLANNER
(117}661
July 28, 1988
Vincent L. Mas
Director
Community Development Department
City of Lynwood
77330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, CA 90262
RE: Potential Impact of Proposed Development on Public School
System Case No. 88047
Dear Mr. Mas:
Please be advised that the Lynwood Unified School District has
received notice of the above application for the proposed residential
development, to be located at 11218 Louise Avenue.
The proposed development is located in the Will Rogers School
Attendance Area. This school is currently overcrowded and although
portable classrooms are being used to help alleviate the problem, the
long range solution to the overcrowded conditions requires the
construction of several new schools. This Iong range solution will
take three to five years.
In addition, any proposed new enrollees due to this residential project
will be attending Hosler Junior High School and Lynwood High School,
both of which are also experiencing severe overcrowded conditions.
The impact of this development to our enrollment may be as follows:
Primary: 0.6 Yield Factor x 5 units = 3.0 new students
Secondary: 0.3 Yield Factor x 5 units = 7.5 new students
If you require any further information, please feel free to contact us.
Very truly yours,
� � ;/ _
M � NA ROMERO ~
� aci ities Planner ,. � ��;j,,)
; �,'��',,.. .
bm
cc: LaVoneia C. Steele, Ed. D. i' �
Clifford A. Koch, Asst. Supt., Bus. Serv. �
l,
,-
- � �,^�NDA ITEM N0.__�._--
C�SE N0. g gQ `�
DATE: August 9, 1988
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Dept.
SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 88049
Applicant: City of Lynwood/Charles Gomez
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting Tentative Parcel Map approval for the
purpose of subdividing a lot into three (3) parcels, in order to
create three lots.
FACTS
1. Source of Authority I
Section 25-18, et seq.', Subdivision Regulations of the I
Lynwood Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act,
Government Code Section 66410, et seq. �
' 2. Property Location I
The subject is located on the southwest corner of Lynwood I
Road and Lindberg Avenue. (See attached Map).
3. Property Size:
The site area is approximately 16,000 square feet in size. �
�
The site is developed with a 2,190 square foot storaqe �
building with asphalt pavement, surrounded by a twelve (12) I
foot high chain link fence. The surrounding land uses are as '
fo]_lows : '
j
North - Single Family Residential East - Single Family Residential �
i
South - Single Family Residential West - Single Family Residential
4. Land Use Designation:
i
The General Plan designation for the property is single �
family; the zoning classification is R-1 Single Family �
Residential. The surrounding land use designations are as �
follows: i
General Plan '
Zoning
I
North - Single Family R-1 �
South - Single Family R-1 ;
i
East - Single Family R-1 ;
i
West - Single Family R-1 I
i
I
DISK 30:88049TPM I
I
I
-- _ I
5. Site Plan Review:
The map was reviewed by the Site Plan Review Committee at its
regular meeting on July 14, 1988, and the Committee
recommends Planning Commission approval subject to
conditions.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
1. Environmental Assessment:
The Community Development Department has determined the
project could not have a significant effect on the
environment, and a Neqative Declaration has been prepared, in
accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended,
(Section 15073).
Staff analysis of this proposed lot division includes the
following findings: (a) use of the proposed site; and (b) :i
consistency of the proposed site with the General Plan and ' '
zoning requirements.
:
Use of the Proposed Site Subdivision �
a. The proposed use of the proposed lot subdivision shows the
division to be in character with existing lots in the area.
b. The tentattive parcel map approval is requested to subdivide
a 16,000 square foot lot into 3 parcels.
c. The site is physically suitable for the type and use �
proposed.
Consistency of the Site with the General Plan �
i
a. Staff's inspection shows the site to be compatible with the �
General Plan which limits land use activities to projects i
that enhance the function and quality of residential �
de��elopments that do not significantly alter the character of �
the existing environment.
b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the objectives, !
policies, and land use specified in the General Plan, in that I
the General Plan designates this area as Single Family
Residential, and the proposed subdivision is consistent with
this designation. �
RECOMMENDATION-
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the Planning
Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2207:
1. Finding that Tentative Parcel Map No. 19954, Case No. 88049, �
will not have a significant effect on the environment and
certify the Negative Declaration as adequate.
�
2. Approving Tentative Map Case No. 88049, subject to the stated (
conditions and requirements. i
Attachments: I
1. Location Map i
2. Tentaive Parcel Map �
3. Resolution No. 2207 s
I
DISK 30:88049TPM i
i
�
�
f 0
I
!
�6 O.fI{� YI • ro1 = `� ' �l = VJO av _.... _ . .
� JO . }lPf 6� IeS ?l SO /OOLb .
/6001 KR0.' KUDZ � �p
, K¢°r 3ad9��. 6 v�o v _3 r e _ k 3�3� a3S
� i° 1f .�_$3�2 . — �� a e v . o
r
U p � �aJ7 8 ica3 co � R � -i7asos Z 3aaq J)3p � o3ay �-
. �- _ - �-,�-�- Yi -.� y�� m °.��_ _��a.aYS O -°'''�'''�s -- � - 3aY m g 3aY7 .
>'. 3av .1av6. . • p --°--
., : z � a � 3,� 7 aa �� c 3 '� °�
i o m 3aS/ JaS4 ' S3q 3^ y y8 0 � � 3as7 .
. e a —° — � �.
� °��57 '^.7�56 4 —�.3JY8, °' . .
�37s7 3ay 3�S o3a6/
� O
�� ._� � a . rZ�$--- —$a6d •�as3 _ 3av' g3av3 O
�cp 3aG7 — � �F .aav� �.�ass ° v .� - � � , 3a�9� ^
�n aa�3 aa�� , ' q3�Ga, $ ,, ? d / � .3a�3 i,
,�, o . D
--�— — �'aaas — �" w
- —'�.�» — 3��8 . » 3ab ° � �c� 3 1 .3a8��— �
. . . a�8,j s�aY _ 5�r;:s;::::::::::'s:i`£:::g:< a+ • 3.� �3 . �
_ � ' � �;:;.: u - -1€ 8 •3�PyM �
$ ` ,�P3 C i�k.'�,�i::�:i:�i: :;::?:�:.;; _ tl —
"N:7:`::
y� � 3a83' � a a3d o� 1 �St..:.'<'?i.t';;�s...... $ 3�7 - 'S - .
7!0 ��� so so iio 0 0 'f::>:�::: S �
� Ko :;::;>z�:<:>;.;::>::.: a p � ;
LINBURC� �
'//'3C'L A�YfNUE � $ _g 3a� _ � 4 . , .
�
O ��O SO '�. �/p N 4 � IO l0 50 /60 � � O � t � 3� •.
o _n�,l .� I (Q� `]JO/p. � f-��� 3a8 c� o i' : � .
� ♦ 1 �r -fa 3a53 ao� o3 ' � .
g 9 G{o � 3307 3�7 ° $ 33ao o?ao,s ` � �
- 33// ° J! ' k �� � -�- o
�_ _4 3f,3� _�a3o� p� 330 : a 33/I• � T
- 33�5 337 -I 33/au o o y .
$ � 3/7 3 D S m 33ui
� -e 33i,f o
3 a/ 33�? rtl. a � 8 33i 7 M �° .
� ' 3 cn ^ — � 3 _ a 3� x-{ 3i3 .v �
' � '�a-�a — � -- aaarH � � o : � a3 ,m ��
� � 3aa � ° m '33.t � yy i � � '� —o-3 — ��'a' � x I
� � .3333 q � • � — q J�`^ , V � �� P �1 v y � , .
q
— � O
� � � a - �39a4 ' 33as
0 4 q u — .''
� 3j 33 v � J73q p k - g --` � v u 47y . a
4 0 - - i J3Yy � . ° �,; 334 - � - Ho � D g.7s n ' ° y . .
�� 339� u y . n_ � 3337� 50 . �':
' ' -"i
88049TPM
RESOLUTION NO. 2207
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
NO. 19954 TO SUBDIVIDE ONE EXISTING PROPERTY,
LOT 618 OF TRACT NO. 2992 AS PER MAP RECORDED
IN BOOK 30, PAGE 78 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF
THE LOS'ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER, COMMONLY KNOWN '
AS 3280 LYNWOOD ROAD, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA.
i
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, �
pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject
application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered all
pertinent testimony offered in the case as presented at the public
hearing; and
WHEREAS, the preparation, filing and recordation of a Parcel �
Map is required for the proposed residential lots development; and i
Section 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that said Tentative Parcel Map No. 19954 should be
approved for the following reasons:
A. The subdivision of the lot meets all the applicable ,
requirements and conditions imposed by the State '
Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the
Lynwood Municipal Code. ;
I
B. The proposed subdivision of the lot is consistent with the �
applicable elements of the General Plan and the Official i
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lynwood.
C. Proper and reasonable provisions have been made for all �
adequate ingress and egress to the lots being combined. i
i
�
D. Proper and adequate provisions have been made for all
public utilities and public services, including sewers. !
E. The project could not have a significant effect on the '
I
environment, and a Negative Declaration has been prepared I
in accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended
(Section 15073). I
1
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood (
hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 19954 in the R-1 (Single- I
Family Residential) zone, subject to the following conditions: ,
I
DISK 30:88049RE5 I
I
;
I
Community Development Department
1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable
regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building
Code and the Uniform Fire Code.
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or
structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community
Development Department, Planning Division, for review of said
Conditional Use Permit.
3. No building permits shall be issued prior to recordation of
the Final Map.
4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a Statement
of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and
agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance
of any building permits.
5. The applicant shall complete the application form before
approval can be given to the proposal (i.e. date page 1;
complete and notarize paqe 2; complete and date page 3).
i
i Public Works/Engineering Division
6. All conditions of the State Map Act and the City's subdivision
Ordinance must be met prior to recordation.
All matters and improvements shall be consistent with the ;
ordinances, standards, and procedures of the City's Development I
Standards, Engineering Procedures and Standards, Water
Standards, and Planting Standards of the Department of Parks
and Recreation. �
The Developer is responsible for checking with staff for I
clarification of these requirements. I
7. Submit a Subdivision Guarantee to this office. i
The final map shall be based on a field survey. All surveying I
far the proposed development will be done by the Developer,
including the establishment of centerline ties. Enclose with '
the final map the surveyor's closure sheets. i
8. Developer shall pav all applicable development fees including �
drainaQe, sewer, water, and parkway trees prior to issuance of i
anv building permits.
I
Pav Parcel Map checking fees prior to checking. �
I
Pav $100.00 monument checkina fee prior to recordation. Deposit i
$50.00 with Citv Enqineer to quarantee receipt by City of
recorded reproducible mvlar, parcel map prior to recordation. �
i
All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees '
are to be paid prior to recording the final map. All �
requirements to the serving utilities to be met or guarantee i
prior to recordinq of the final map. !
I
9. Grading and Draining I
(
A grading plan signed by a registered Civil Engineer shall be i
submitted for approval of the Director of Public Works/City i
Engineer and the Director of Community Development. The !
grading plan shall include the topography of all contiguous i
properties and streets and shall provide for the methods of I
drainage in accordance with all applicable City standards. i
DISK 30:88049RES �
f
i
I
Retaining walls and other protective measures may be required.
Offsite drainage easements may be necessary. The structural
section of all parking areas shall be designed by a Civil
Engineer based upon soils analysis supplied by a recoqnized and
approved soils engineering firm. The structural section of all
parking areas shall be designed by a Civil Enqineer based upon
soils analysis supplied by a recognized and approved soils
engineering firm. The structural section shall be approved by
the Director of Public works/City Engineer. In the event that
the design is not provided, the minimum structural section
shall be approved by the Director of Public Works/City
Engineer. In the event that the design is not provided, the
minimum structural section that will be approved by the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer. In the event that the
design is not provided, the minimum structural section that
will be approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer
would be 2 inches of asphalt on 4 inches on untreated rock
base.
Submit to this office a Geologic/Soils Report signed by a
Registered Soils Engineer.
10. Sewers
The development shall be provided with public sewers. Connect
to public sewer. Provide laterals as necessary. Design of all
sanitary sewers shall be approved by the Director of public
Works/City Engineer. .
11. Water Systems
The Developer shall construct a water system including water
services, fire hydrants and appurtenances through the
development as required by the Director of Public Works/City
Engineer. The Developer shall submit a water system plan to
the City of Lynwood Fire Department for fire hydrant locations.
The City will install water meters only. Payment for said
meters shall be made to the City prior to issuance of building
permits. The Developer shall install meters and fire hydrants i
on interior and on boundary arterial streets.
i
All conditions of the Lynwood Fire Department must be met prior �
to recordation. �
I
12. Public Easements and.Right of Way i
Where drainage, sewer and other such easements are requried, i
the minimum easement width shall be ten (10) feet to facilitate �
maintenance unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public '
Works/City Engineer.
Dedicate a ei ht (8) foot wide stri of y g y �
g p propert alon L nwood ;
Road. Dedicate a five (5) foot wide strip of property along
lindberg Avenue. �
�
13. Sidewalks
I
Design, configuaration and locations shall be subject to the �
approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, and the j
Director of Community Development. Ramps for physically I
handicapped persons shall be provided both on-site and off- �
site as required by State and local regulations. I
14. Dust Control and Pedestrian Safety '
Prior to the issuance of demolition or grading permits, the �
developer shall: j
DISK 30:88049RES
j
I
I
a. Submit a plan indicating safety methods to be provided to
. ' maintain safe pedestrian ways around all areas of
construction. This may require proper and adequate signs,
fences, barricades, or other approved control devices as
required by the Director of Community Development.
. 15. The Developer shall install all public improvements, as
required by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer prior to .
issuance of anv occupancy permits for this development. Public
� , Improvements shall include but are not limited to:
a. Construction of new PCC sidewalk along Lindberg Avenue and .
Lynwood Road.
b. Construction of new PCC curb and gutter along Lindberg
Avenue and Lynwood Road.
c. Construction of (1) wheelchair ramp at the intersection of
Lindberg Avenue and Lynwood Road.
d. Underground all utilities.
Al1 changes and repairs in existing curbs, gutters, and .
. sidewalks and other public improvements shall be paid for by
the developer. If improvements are to be guaranteed, a
faithful performance bond shall be posted by the developer to
guarantee installation of said public improvements and an
agreement for completion of improvements with the City Council
shall be entered into. Submit Policy of Insurance or bond
, protecting City against damage or injury to persons or property
growing out of, related to, or resulting from improvements or
work. The Director of Public Works/City Engineer will
. determine amount and form. Deposit with the Director of Public
- Works/City Engineer before commencing any improvements, a sum
estimated by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to
cover dost of inspection of all improvements under his
jurisdiction.
' Se ction 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the
applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of August, 1988, by members
of the Planninq Commission voting as follows:
AYES-
NOES:
ABSENT: ,
`' ABSTAIN:
Donald Dove, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes
' Community Development Department Deputy City Attorney
DISK 30:88049RE5
' 88049
CITY OF LYNWOOD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTPiENT
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
ASSESSMENT OF F.NVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR A TENTATIVE PARCEL ,
MAP APPLICATION TO SUBDIVIDE ONE EXISTING PROPERTY INTO THREE
'' (3) R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIllENTIAL) LOTS AT 3280 LYN��OOD
ROAD, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, IN THE R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL) ZONE.
A. Proiect Location and Description
-The subject site is located at 3280 L,ynwood Road on the
Southwest corner of Lynwood Road and Lindberg Avenue. The
site is zoned for Single-Family Residential use, and the
General Plan designation for the lot is Single-Family
Residential. ".
The application is to subdivide one existing parcel into
three (3) R-1 (Single-family) lots. A Tentative Parcel Map
will be filed to subdivide the ehisting parcel into three (3)
, lots. The site is located on an arterial street
approsimately 1,305 feet south of the Century Freeway.
B. Purpose of the Proiect
The purpose of the project is to obtain approval. of a
' tenative map application to subdivide an existing parcel into
� three (3) single-family'lots to have devel.oped for single-
family use.
, The General Plan designation (Single-Family Residential),
zoning classification (R-1), and the existing land uses are
compatible with the proposed use.
C. Discussion of Environmental Impacts
The snbject property has been occupied with a 2,190 square
- foot storage building with asphalt pavement, surrounded by a
twelve (12') foot high chain linlc fence for several years.
The site is appropriate and desirable for single-family use
due to its location within a res,idential neighborhood and its
relati.ve proximate to shopping and transit service.
There would not be any significant environmental impacts to
properties surrounding the subject site.
Devel.opment of tlie site for residenY.ial use would be an �
improvement in the area and allevi.ate health, safety, and
aesthetie impacts resulting from a vacant lot and structure.
The proposal has been approved by the City's Site Plan Review �
� �. Committee. � '
88049ND
1 � ;'
' A.^E�1CA IYEM N0. g _____._
CASE N0. ��D 5�_,._
August 9,'1988
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88051
Applicants: Roberto and Maria Gonzalez
PROPOSAL �
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to
build seven (7) studio-style senior citizens' apartment
units, and maintain an existing single-family dwelling at
5221-5225 Beechwood Avenue, Lynwood, CA.
FACTS ,
The plans the applicants submitted do not meet the code
requirements in several significant 'areas, and staff
requires additional time to assist the applicant in solving
these problems.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully request that the Planning Commission
continued this matter to its next regular meetinq on
September 13, 1988.
�
f
�
I
�
j
, I
(
I
Disk 31:88051 i
�
i
I
I
i
�
,- ,,
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY, JUNE 14, 1988
OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Call to Order ,
Although the agenda stated the Planning Commission meeting
was to start at 7:00 p.m., it wasn't called to order until
7:35 p.m. by Vice-Chairperson Dove on the above-captioned
date, in the Council Chambers of the Lynwood City Hall, 11330
Bullis Road, Lynwood, California. Mr. Vicente Mas stated that
the time shown in the agenda was due to a typographical
error.
�
B. Pledge of Allegiance �
i
Commissioner Penalber led the Pledge of Allegiance. �
�
C. Roll Call of Commissioners I
Vice-Chairperson Dove requested the roll call, and Mr. I
Vicente Mas complied.
I
Present: Commissioner ponald Dove I
Commissioner John K. Haynes �
Commissioner Alberto Montoya Penalber i
Commissioner Roy Pryor
Commissioner David J. Willis, Jr. I
MOTION by Commissioner Haynes, SECONDED by Commissioner �
Penalber, to grant an excused absence for Commissioner Kanka, �
who is ill; and Commissioner Cole-Dennis, will be I
approximately 30 minutes late. MOTION carried unaminously. i
'
Also present: Douglass Barnes, Deputy City Attorney
" I
Vicente Mas, Director I
• Community Development Department
Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Senior Planner
,
James Devore, Associate Civil Engineer �
Public Works/Engineering Division I
Harden Carter, Planning Consultant !
Willdan and Associates
Art Barfield, Planning Technician
Joy Valentine, Minutes Clerk �
i
D. Approval of Minutes �
I
Mr. Vicente Mas stated that, per the Brown Act, the agenda I
had been duly posted.
MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner
Penalber, to approve and accept the minutes of April 26,
1988, as presented to the Commission.
Disk M1:PC061488
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Haynes, Penalber, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner
Pryor, to approve and accept the minutes of May 10, 1988, as
presented to the Commission.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Haynes, Penalber, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None•
ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88012
3532 Los Flores Blvd. (Herbert Thomas)
Applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to build
four apartments at the subject address in the R-3 zone.
Mr. Harden Carter informed the Commission that the applicant
has requested that this matter be continued to the next
Planning Commission meeting on July 12, 1988.
MOTION made by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by �
Commissioner Pryor, to continue Case No. 88012 to the next
Planning Commission on July 12, 1988.
MOTION carried by the following vote: i
,
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Haynes, Penalber, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None -
ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
2. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88023 �
3630 Imperial Highway (St. Francis Medical Center) �
Applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to build two
medical facilities at the subject address in the H-M-D zone.
Mr. Harden Carter informed the Commission that the applicant i
had requested that this matter be continued to the next i
Planning Commission meeting on July,12, 1988.
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner
Haynes to continue Case No. 88023 to the next Planning i
Commission meeting on July 12, 1988. !
i
�
Disk M1:PC061488
I
I
2 I
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Haynes, Penalber, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Kanka �
ABSTAIN: None
3. Conditional Use Permit - Case�No. 88025
11136 Duncan Avenue (Bill Conroy)
Applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to build five
apartments at the subject address in the R-3 zone. Neither
the applicant nor his representative was present at the last
meeting of the Planning Commission, so the matter was
continued to this meeting. No request has been made for a
density bonus.
z
After being assured that the applicant was present, MOTION ;
was made by Commissioner Haynes, SECONDED by Commissioner
Penalber, to reopen the hearing on Conditional Use Permit No.
88025.
MoTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Haynes, Penalber, Pryor, Willis �
s
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Kanka
i
ABSTAIN: None
'
Vice-Chairperson Dove reopened the Public Hearing and asked
the applicant for comments. Bill Conroy, 5773 Lincoln, South
Gate, California, stated he wants to build five units and
accepted all 32 conditions with the exception of No. 19,
which requires a 20' driveway. He stated there is only•space
for a 16-18' driveway.
1
Mr. Carter checked the plan he was given by the applicant, i
and stated there is only 12' available between the present
building and the fence.
Mr. James Devore stated the applicant had three choices; (1)
20' driveway; (2) a sprinkler system or (3) a 4" fire line.
He added that a fourth choice would' be to remove the present
building.
Mr Conroy stated he would accept either the sprinklers or the ?
4" fire line.
I
Mr Mas suggested that the Commissioners should vote approval '
contingent upon Fire Department approval (or Fire Chief), and �
the applicant stated his acceptance of this suggestion. �
Vice-Chairperson Dove requested comments of approval from the
audience, then comments of disapproval, receiving neither, he
closed the Public Hearing. '
Staff and the Commission discussed the location of the units �
within the lot, the 20' setback, the lenqth of the lot, and
the area of the lot. �
I
Disk M1: PC061488
�
3
I
MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner
Haynes, to adopt Resolution No. 2186, "A RESOLUTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING
, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88025 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF �
THREE (3) TWO-STORY BUILDINGS AT 11136 DUNCAN AVENUE,
` LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, IN THE R-3 (MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)
ZONE," subject to Fire Department approval, and certify the
Negative Declaration as adequate.
• ' ` MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Haynes, Penalber, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
4. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88028
3327 Sanborn Avenue (Willard Michlin) '
Applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to.build three,
three-bedroom apartments at the rear of an existing single
family dwelling in the R-3 zone.
Mr. Carter reminded the Commissioners that they had many
concerns at the last meeting and only the inadequate turning
radiu5 had been resolved by the applicant. Many concerns
remain unaddressed, such as the three stories structure,
requiring children to climb many stairs, and inadequate play
area. Both landscaped areas and parking spaces are fulfillinq
only the absolute minimum required by the City, and remain ,
unchanged since last meeting. Although the Commission
suggested that one unit be dropped, the plans.are still for
three, three-bedroom, apratments in a three-floor structure.
Mr. Mas stated that there had been no chanqe in the amount of
play area or density, as requested by the Commissioners.
Vice-Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing and Willard
Michlin, applicant, 6324 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles,
California, 90028, rose with his attorney, John Hertz. Mr.
Michlin stated he is trying to supply Lynwood residents with
affordable housing. He stated,the children can play in the
existing front yard. {Play area was discussed throughout the
meeting, by almost everyone, with the applicant continuing to
state that children need bedrooms more than play area, and
- staff and Commission continuing to want more than the ;
, absolute minimum play area provided by the applicant.) ;
Commissioner Haynes stated Sanborn Avenue is not a good area
for three apartments. Commissioner pove stated the location
is close to the shopping area on Long Beach Boulevard and
desirable, when one considers that hiqh density residential
, development is appropriate when located adjacent to a '
shopping district, however, his preference is that one unit
be eliminated,.thereby £reeing more play area for children.
Mr. Mas stated that under Section 8, it is considered that
four units will have eight adults and eighteen children. This '
number of adults, if each has a car, could worsen the already
present street circulation problem. Mr. Mas asked Mr. Michlin
. how much rent he expected the new units to generate and the �
applicant replied that he expected $800.00 per unit could be
charged.
I
Disk Ml: PC061488
4
Commissioner Pryor stated his dislike of the trash area in
front, and stated the trash area would be visible from the
second and third floor of the apartments.
The applicant's architect rose to explain the trash area, and
Commissioner pove stated it might be better to relocate it.
Mr. Carter stated that the 25� density bonus is included in
the proposed plan; and is it is up to the Planning Commission
to allow the additional density.
Commissioner pove asked what the front house looks and the
architect showed the Commissioners a picture of the present
' home. The architect stated his intent to make the three new
apartments look like the present house. Commissioner pove
suggested enhancing the front of the existing house with
rock, veneer, or brick and Mr. Michlin agreed to do so..
Mr. Michlin questioned Condition No. 34. Since the street is
already paved, why should he have to change it? Also, No. 37,
a tree of that size will cost $1,000.00.
Mr. Devore stated that No. 34 is necessary because the
present gutter is substandard and the construction should
only run $6.00 per foot. Mr. Michlin then agreed to condition
No. 34. Mr. Devore also insisted that No. 37 be retained, and j
told Mr. Michlin could that the City will be buyinq trees
that size for $250.00, Mr. Michlin could get one at the same '
time. '
Mr. Mas stated the sewer must be exposed to see the existing
size and Mr. Michlin agreed.
Mr. Michlin stated Condition No. 39 would cost at least
$5,000.00 Mr. Devore suggested Mr. Michlin talk with John
Richardson at Edison, as Edison will do it for about $800.00.
Mr. Michlin agreed to Condition No. 39 at that price.
Since Mr. Michlin had accepted all the conditions, Vice-
Chairperson Dove asked if anyone else in the audience wished
to speak for or against the project, there being no one,
Vice-Chairperson Dove closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Pryor stated he doesn't like the location of the I
trash containers and this will be like a hotel on a postage-
sized lot, with too much density on a narrow lot on a narrow
street. It was his opinion that not enough parking was
supplied onsite, and he was opposed to the bonus unit.
Commissioner Penalber basically agreed with Commissioner
Pryor.
Commissioner Haynes stated he visited the site a second time
and still thinks the project exceeds the density.
MOTION by Commissioner Haynes, SECONDED by Commissioner '
Willis, to deny Conditional Use Permit No. 88028.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Haynes, Penalber, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None '
ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
Disk M1: PC061488
I
�
5 �
Applicant's attorney, John Hertz, asked the Commission for a
chance to try again. Also, Mr. Mas suggested that
Commissioner Haynes withdraw his motion and that the
Commissioners agree on any of the various forms of reduction
that would satisfy them and still give the applicant a chance
to develop his property.
Mr. Michlin asked the Commissioners to tell him what they
wanted, approve it and he'd have his architect redesign the
plans to accommodate the Commissioners' desires.
Mr. Barnes suggested the Commissioners could bring the item
back at the next meeting. '.
Commissioner pove stated he could approve two three-bedroom
apartments or a duplex with three bedrooms each, plus the '
existing unit, which would reduce the total by one three-
bedroom apartment. Mr. Michlin asked if he could have one
two-bedroom apartment and two three-bedroom apartments, but %
Commissioner pove stayed with the elimination of one unit. �
s
MOTION by Commissioner Haynes, SECONDED by Commissioner e
Penalber, not to approve the project as submitted and to give -
additional time to the applicant so his architect can design ;
an acceptable plan with two, three-bedroom apartments instead '
of three three-bedroom apartments and bring the item back to '
i
the Planning Commission on July 12, 1988. '•
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Haynes, Penalber, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None '
ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Kanka `
ABSTAIN: None �
3
�
NEW PUHLIC HEARINGS: ;
5. Conditional Use Permit - No. 88029
11143' Wright Road (Narcisco Ubario)
Applicant requests a Conditional.Use Permit to build a one-
bedroom family dwelling and carport at the rear of an s
existing single family dwelling with covered patio at subject i
address in the R-3 zone.
Mr. Carter noted that staff originally overlooked the 3'
setback on the plans and for this reason staff distributed a
memo to all interested parties listing the conditions that i'
will have to be met to accommodate the presently required 5'
setback. Mr. Carter stated that the main chanqes were Item B,
for a 10' concrete driveway with a 25' turnaround radius; �
Item C, remove existing patio, and Item D, applicant must
submit a revised site plan showing six additional required
conditions. j
1
Mr. Mas suggested that Item C should have seven additional
conditions, adding No. 7, that the setback must be 5' and the
plans must be modified to comply with the City Code.
M
Vice-Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing and applicant
Narciso C. Ubario, 11143 Wright Road, Lynwood; rose and
stated his acceptance of all conditions.
Disk M1: PC061488
6
�
Vice-Chairperson Dove asked for comments both for and against
the proposed Conditional Use Permit, there being none, he
' closed the Public Hearing. -
MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner
Haynes,- to approve Resolution No. 2199, "A RESOLUTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88029 FOR THE CONSTRUCTZON OF A
ONE-BEDROOM RESIDENTIAL UNIT AND CARPORT AT 11143 WRIGHT
ROAD, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, IN THE R-3 (MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL) ZONE," and find that the proposed development is
categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines, as amended.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Haynes, Penalber, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Kanka '
a
�
�
ABSTAIN: None
s
z
6. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88036 �
5126 Imperial Highway (Angelo Sarantopoulos) �
Applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to open a �
new/used car sales business with minor automobile repairs at
the subject address in the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone. �
s
Mr. Carter distributed a memo to all interested parties `
concerning the submission of inadequate and incomplete plans a
by the applicant and insufficient information received from ;
the applicant regarding the operation of his proposed
new/used car sales lot. Said memo lists eight specific �
conditions and a request for more general information. `
3
Vice-Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing and Angelo ;
Sarantopoulos, 10341 Garfield Avenue, South Gate, rose to :
state that he originally submitted an application and site ;
plan to the Planning Division, which they lost. He then
submitted another site plan, then a supplemental which showed �
much of the information listed on the memo just circulated by
Mr. Harden, but not the circulation plan. He doesn't own the �
property but the owner is willing to improve the property to �
make it look nice. He accepted all conditions, including, ?
both those he was given previously and the new conditions on
the memo.
Mr. Karefa-Johnson stated there are certain problems with
this property. There is no fence dividing the five lots and
they share a common driveway. This property is next door to ;
the property where the Commission just granted a Conditional
Use Permit for a man to install automobile alarms and i
assemble carts. Mr. Karefa-Johnson stated he had visited that ;
shop and automobile body work is being performed in violation �
of that Conditional Use Permit.
Mr. Mas stated he has observed many violations of the City !
Code at the same site. On June 15, 1988, a Code Enforcement �
Officer will go there to protest that onsite improvements
have not been made, such as, no landscaping has been
installed, and no concrete work has been done. Mr. Mas said
he intends to do the paperwork involved to ask for revocation
of that Conditional Use Permit if no compliance is obtained
in a reasonable time.
Disk M1: PC061488
� I
I
� Mr. Karefa-Johnson said Mr. Sarantopoulos had just presented
staff with a new site plan and staff will need time to review
• the new site plan.
There being no one wishing to speak either for or against the
� proposal, Vice-Chairperson Dove closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner pove suggested that approval should be delayed
for one more month to allow staff time to make sure all
conditions will be met by the applicant, owner of the
property and other renters now ignoring the conditions of the
already-granted Conditional Use Permit. .
Mr. Sarantopoulos requested that the Commissioners and staff
�do whatever is necessary so that he could obtain the
Conditional Use Permit.
A discussion ensued between staff, Commissioners and
applicant concerning the various conditions, with the
applicant explaining his site plan to staff and the
Commission.
Commissioner Willis stated the only way this could be cleared
up would be for staff and the applicant to get together and
bring the item back to the Commission at the July 12; 1988
meeting.
Mr. Carter stated the new memo responds to the new plans but
problems still exist.
' Mr. Mas suggested that the Commission consider approv'ing the
C.U.P. contingent upon applicant and staff resolving the
conditions in contentions. He further stated �hat delaying
the approval for a month would create very serious financial
hardships on the applicant. Mr. Mas discussed Condition Nos.
15, 16, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, and 29, plus the
resCrictions on how the Conditional Use Permit may be used by
the applicant, (what he can do, sell, etc.). Mr. Mas stated
that Conditional No. 26 may not apply.
MOTION by Commissioner Pryor to adopt Resolution No. 2193, "A
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT E'OR THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
APPRUVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF NEW AND
USED AUTOMOBILES AND MINOR AUTOMOBILE REPAIRS IN THE C-3
(HEAVY COMMERCIAL) ZONE, 5126 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, LYNWOOD,
CALIFORNIA," subject to all coriditions and applicant is
required to meet with staff concerning any other conditions
that might be imposed. Also, finding that the Conditional Use
Permit, Case No. 88036, is exempt from the provisions of the
State CEQA Guidelines, as amended. Commissioner Pryor
commented that he has known Mr. Sarantopoulos for ten years,
he is a fine businessman who runs a fine restaurant and
Commissioner Pryor expects that the applicant will improve
the area where this Conditional Use Permit will apply. MOTION
SECONDED by Commissioner Haynes.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Haynes, Pryor,
NOES: Commissioners Penalber, Willis
ABSENT: Cominissioners Cole-Dennis, Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
Bisk M1: PC061488 '
8
Mr. Mas stated that used cars are presently being sold from
� the applicant's restaurant parking lot, which is illegal.
Mr. 5arantopoulos stated he is doing this because he will
lose his State license if he doesn't sell cars.
. Commissioner Penalber commented, "You are breaking the law
now. How do we know you won't continue to break laws7"
- Mr. Mas stated staff will work with the applicant to do what '
must be done now, and get the remainder done in 90 days. '
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS
None
STAFF COMMENTS
Mr. Mas commented that the Commissioners will be expected to '
elect a new Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson at its July 12, 1988
meeting.
Mr. Karefa-Johnson stated that Chairperson Kanka requested that .
her name not be placed.in nomination for Chairperson again.
Mr. Mas asked the Commissioners to consider changing the meeting '
starting time from 7:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Commissioner pove
stated his approval of the change to 7:00 p.m., but he was .
concerned that this would encourage longer discussions, rather
than shorten the meeting time. There was no consensus among �
Commission members on this matter.
COMMISSION ORALS
Commissioner Penalber stated he didn't like being pressured by
` applicants. Staff should inform applicant not to buy licenses
until they have fulfilled all the Conditional Use Permit
requirements. Commissioner Pryor asked if staff couldn't deny the
applicant approval to obtain licenses until all conditions were
met and'�Mr. Mas stated he couldn't answer that question but he
did not believe staff could legally do so.
Later, Mr. Mas stated there have been considerable staff changes
- and State law requires that the item must be brought to the
Planning Commission within a certain time frame after the
original application is submitted, even if conditions have not
been met. He further stated the applicant has the right to appeal
determinations. , �
Mr. Mas stated he is now back to work on a part-time basis and ?
will on a part-time basis for another six to eight weeks. '
�
Commissioner Penalber requested that City Council present Eugene
Raymond with a Certificate of Approval, which prompted a short
discussion between staff and Commissioners. Mr. Karefa-Johnson
stated the City Council has already made a motion to give Mr.
Raymond a plaque. The City Clerk has already contacted staff for
information pertaining to the plaque, but since he hasn't heard i
anything more about it, Mr. Karefa-Johnson said he will check
into it.
�
Disk M1: PC061488
�
f
9
!
�
Commissioner Penalber reminded staff he had already requested a
�report on how much the school board gets on new multi-tenant
developments. Mr. Karefa-Johnson replied that report is planned
for the July 12, 1988, meeting. ,
Commissioner pove repeated his May meeting complaint concerning
name signs painted out at Thrifty Drug Store and the World
Savings building.
Commissioner Penalber stated those who put up election signs
should be required to remove them after the elections are over.
Commissioner Pryor stated the area of Cortland to the freeway and
to Wright Road is now a big junkyard.
Mr. Mas stated that Code Enforcement is trying to do something !�
about this junky area, but it is required by law to follow a
lengthy, time-consuming procedure. He added that some cases have
been pursued for over three years and are just going to court.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION was made to adjourn by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by
Commissioner Penalber, and carried unanimously that the meeting'
be adjourned to the next regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on July 12, 1988, at 7:30 p.m., City Hall Council
Chamber, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, CA. The meeting adjourned
at 10:00 p.m.
APPROVED AS WRITTEN this day of , 1988. �
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
ATTEST:
I
�
Vicente L. Mas, Secretary i
i
I
I
�
Disk M1: PC061488
I
�
(
I
10
Y '.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE PLANNING CONIl�iISSION
CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY, JULY 12, 1988
OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Call to Order
The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City
of Lynwood was called to order by Vice-Chairperson Dove on
the above-captioned date at 7:30 p.m., in the Council
Chambers, Lynwood City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood,
California. .
B. Pledcte of Alle4iance
Commissioner Penalber led the Pledge of Allegiance.
C. Roll Call of Commissioners
D. Vice-Chairperson Dove requested roll call; Ms. Tilford
complied. .
Present: Commissioner ponald Dove
Commissioner John Haynes
Commissioner Alberto Montoya Penalber
Commissioner Roy Pryor
Commissioner David Willis, Jr.
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner Willis i
to excuse Commissioner Kanka because of illness. Motion carr.ied
unanimously. �
Also Present: Douglas D. Barnes, Deputy City Attorney i
Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Senior Planner
Redevelopment Division !
Dorethea Tilford, Act. Senior Planner
�
- Planning Division '
Arthur Barfield, Planning Technician ;
Planning Division
Jim Devore, Associate Civil Engineer �
Public Works Department �
� Amir Malik, Engineering Assistant �
Public Works Department �
I
Harden Carter, Consultant
Willdan & Associates i
i
Joy Valentine, Minutes Clerk �
D. Certification of Aaenda Posting I
I
Mr. Karefa-Johnson stated that the agenda had been duly i
posted, in accordance with the Brown Act.
E. Approval of Minutes i
� MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner
- Pryor, to approve and accept the Minutes of the adjourned
meetinq of May 10, 1988, and the Special Meeting of May 24,
1988, as presented. !
_ M3:PC071288 �
: I
Y I
1
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commisssioners Dove, Haynes, Penalber, Pryor,
Willis
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis and Kanka
ABSTAIN: NONE
F. Election of Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson for 1988-89
Mr. Karefa-Johnson said Commissioner Kanka had asked that
her name not be placed in nomination.
Commissioner Pryor nominated Commissioner pove as
Chairperson. The nomination was seconded by Commissioner
Penalber. [There were no other nominations.] Commissioner
Dove was elected Chairman of the Planning Commission for
1988-89.
Commissioner willis nominated Commissioner Pryor as Vice-
Chairperson; Mr. Pryor refused to accept the nomination.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis arrived at 7:43 p.m.
Commissioner Pryor nominated Commissioner Penalber as Vice-
Chairperson. The nomination was seconded by Commissioner
Willis. [There were no other nominations.] Mr. Penalber was
elected Vice-Chairperson of the Planning Commission for
T988-89.
Mr. Devore introduced Amir Malik, Engineering Assistant, to'the ,
Planning Commission.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS
;�;` 1. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88012 �
3532 Los Flores Boulevard (Herbert Thomas)
Mr. Carter informed the Commission that this matter was �
continued from the June 14, 1988 meeting of the Planninq �
Commission. Since the applicant has not submitted his
revised site plans, staff is requesting that this case be
continued to the Auqust 9, 1988 meeting of the �
rN Commission. Mr. Carter said the applicant was present and I
would be able to answer any questions the Commissioners
;�° might have with respect to the delay.
, 5t7
Mr. Thomas came to the podium and explained that he had been
��; instructed by the Commission to scale his project down from I
five (5) units to four (4) and to supply more parking and
- play apparatus. The applicant said his architect has been I
working on the plans and has made some progress. He said
";;� the plans will be ready for the meeting of August 9, 1988,
%'�. if he is qranted a continuance. I
s:i I
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner
Pryor, to continue Case No. 88012 to the next regular i
meeting of the Planning Commission on August 9, 1988. ;
�
~j,, I
IFM_'
"JR: I
� I
�
�
I
- M3:PC071288 j
.���.�.��
'Y.LC�. I
l
2 I
`iciz
,`�: ;=:
::;>�-i
N" .� .,
:')'.;'•:•
MOTION carried by the following vote:
���::::
-;::;.::.
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Haynes,
�:%F,:� Penalber, Pryor and Willis
��"`-'-' NOES : NONE
t=:>:ii;2
ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
'si::;
ABSTAIN: NONE
�`" 2. Conditional Use Permit- Case No. 88023
: l.Y �
":;;;; 3630 Imperial Highway (St. Francis Medical Center)
�;1.°:;.
::ii�;';= Harden Carter reported that staff has met with the
"�"%� representatives from St. Francis Medical Center and some of
-'�-%�;=
the issues have been resolved. Mr. Karefa-Johnson informe
the Commission that the applicant should be ready next
��''�`"' month.
`!"`- MOTION by Commissioner Cole-Dennis, SECONDED by Commissioner
Penalber to continue Case No. 88023 to the next regular
:;:•+;;:; meeting of the Planninq Commission on August 9, 1988.
""``� MOTION carried by the following vote:
::;,. :;;
�"�'°�`-` AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Haynes,
`�%>';:;i;
Penalber, Pryor and Willis
";�""= NOES: NONE
:?ti': ,
�>;<i`�::'
ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
x,:�. .:
"''-`' ABSTAIN: NONE
- 3. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88028
3327 Sanborn Avenue (Willard Michlin)
Mr. Carter reported that the applicant had requested a
Conditional Use Permit to build three (3) apartments at the
""��'r` rear of an existing single-family dwelling at the subject
",::��: address in the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone.
�%;��i;:. However, at the June 14, 1988 meeting, the Planning
Commission instructed the applicant to eliminate one unit in
'�;i;'; order that there would be more parkinq and a play area. The
;:%a=:: :::
Commission continued the matter to its regular meeting of
-'•7:-.; July 12, 1988. However, the applicant decided to appeal the
case to the City Council. Therefore, staff is recommending
;-�ra: ;?;:;
that the Planning Commission deny this application.
�" Chairperson Dove opened the Public Heawring and asked for
`,.,` comments for or against the application. There being no
comments from the audiences, Chairperson Dove closed the
Public Hearinq. �
MOTION by Commissioner Haynes, SECONDED by Commissioner
r; �,..<,;,;-� Pryor, to adopt Resolution No. 2197, "A RESOLUTION OF THE +
;-;���'= PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DENYING I
�`%="`%'; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88028 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
``"``�% THREE-UNIT MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING WITH FIRST
:-:;tx: (
�''�- - FLOOR UNDER-ROOF PARKING AT 3327 SANBORN AVENUE, LYNWOOD,
,<zi<-;;.c' CALIFORNIA," and finding that Conditional Use Permit No. i
:<,,,;r,:-,
%%;>-:?-: 88028 is Categorically Exempt from the provisions of t e
i
-- State CEQA Guidelines, as amended.
" I
'Y �'.c.;.A
�
I
=:":�':�-� M3:PC071288 �
:-.�; (
�
i
3 �
•;:`3t`—�;�i;; ,
;,r�'-z.:.. , �
"�`'�`> MOTION carried by the following vote:
�i'•'1.•%;
.r.;::: :.
?�r;��% AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Haynes,
Penalber, Pryor and Willis
_"�%"= NOES: NONE
�:;;.=-:
'%%%�= ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
ABSTAIN: NONE
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS
%<"_.'-=;?:: 9. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88046
%;i':'� Mr. Karefa-Johnson asked the Commission to hear Agenda Item
No. 9 at this point because of the time constraints of the
'`<-''�' the applicant.
Ms. Tilford presented the staff report indicating as
�"'�rv'�' f o llows :
� The applicant is reguesting a Conditional Use Permit in
order to build a single family dwelling on a vacant lot in
;:�:%-; the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. The proposal was
- approved by the Site Plan Review Committee, subject to
specific conditions and requirements. The project is
;;;`;i Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines, as amended.
"' Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearinq.
:;,s;>::: �
:<'�:t::< �
::'.':f.'..'��`.:
;:;;�; Wally Taylor, 5509 South La Cienega, Los Anqeles,
::::�=>; California, spoke on behalf of his application. He asked if
�"`-'- he could install a wooden fence rather than the masonry
-- wall because the wooden fence would be less expensive. Mr.
Taylor commented that a developer at the rear of his
property is installing a wooden•fence.
Chairperson Dove explained that the masonry wall is a I
standard requirement for all R-2 and R-3 developments. The �
�;;:�.z< Commission instructed staff to investigate the claim �
;;:;:?::? of Mr. Taylor with respect to the wooden fences at the
`=� other developments. Staff was instructed to make the
;:,;.`;; determination whether Mr. Taylor would be required to i
install a wooden fence or a masonry wall, if the other
M;,�:-� developers had been given approval to build a wood fence by I
;�;�:;� the Planning Commission. �
"''�' Mr. Taylor also questioned the 25$ landscaping and automatic i
I sprinkler requirements. The Chairperson again explained i
that these items are code requirements that are imposed upon
all developers proposing to build apartments in the R-2 and
° <; R-3 zones.
' The Planning Commission did not delete the requirement of �
the automatic sprinkler system. i
Mr. Taylor remarked that he accepted all of the conditions �
imposed. - �
I
Chairperson Dove asked if there were any comments for or I
against the proposal. I
::�.. �
;.` I
�-:i:: ?. !
- M3:PC071288
�
;; �i
i
:�;; =: 4 �
s; �:>r'i
"�-�^:�;; .
There being no further comments from the audience,
Chairperson Dove closed the Public Hearing.
The Commissioners discussed the block wall fence requirement
for all developments in the medium to high density
;;;:'i;?i residential zones.
� "
Commissioner Pryor inquired about the Commission'saresinrleg
a masonry wall when an applicant is only building 4
,;
family dwelling.
on developmentssin the1Re2 andtRt3ezonesireme��tthe typeoseod
development.
t :-�= Mr. Barnes advised that, under the Conditional Use Permit
process, the Commission has the discretion to look at each
development and determine if it is reasonable to require a
block wall for each project.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis commented that it was interestinq
that the Lynwood Unified School District had responded to
the impact of the single-family development.
r ;
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner
Haynes, to approve Resolution No. 2194, "A RESOLUTION OF THE
'"='"�= PLANNING COMMISS30N OF THE CITY OE LYNWOOD APPROVING
rs?': ,:-
%"=.' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88046 T0 CONSTRUCT A SINGL
-::�.„:
FAMILY DWELLING IN THE R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE AT
11670 POPE AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA," and findExempt
<, Conditional Use Permit No. 88046 is Categorically
�� :
=--.r from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as
:s;;;�f; amended, and amend the condition that the requirement of
the fence must be approved by the Community Development
Director or his/her designee.
�'::.:t:
x,r
}� MOTION carried by the following vote:
P ' AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Haynes,
;.'::: 'I�^..•
`���1�-% Penalber and Pryor ,
:::,�.r,:;;
:.:�.3.��: .
'<-�`' NOES: NONE
;?;::ir.- .
'�"' ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
ABSTAIN: NONE
Mr. Taylor expressed thanks to the Commission.
,,r.,.,= 4. General Plan Amendment Case No. 88030
11539, 11615 Lewis Street and 3519 Louise Street
- (LOUi5 Ross)
� 4a. Zone Chanae - Case No. 88030
,.,,.;. The applicant is requesting a Zone Change and General PTan
` Amendment on certain parcels in order to build a convenience
� store/market. Staff had requested that the Planning
Commission deny the application; however, the applicant is
� proposing to re-desiqn the site plan; therefore, staff is
requesting that the matter be continued to the August 9,
r;,
1988 meeting of the Planning Commission.
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing.
.,: _k'
` M3:PC071288
<'=<µ�:::->
�=� > : ,;f
5
r::
:^:r!N I
_�%' Jim Marquez, 11334 Parkview Avenue, Manhattan Beach, CA.,
;:r':
spoke in behalf of the project. He said he would be working
- with the applicant to design a proposal that would meet the
code requirements of the City. Mr. Marquez said the
applicant is proposincj to operate a grocery store and not a
convenience store. He explained that the difference between
a convenience store and a grocery market is in the floor
area of the store. He said the store will carry a full line
of food items, as well as meat and produce.
Mr. Marquez said the entire development will consist of a
grocery store, laundrymat, dry cleaners, check cashing
`"`•'%%� business and a gas station. He mentioned that there is a
cul-de-sac problem which has to be resolved with the Public
'::<;� ;:
Works Department.
:%r;.:;; Mr. Marquez showed a colored plan of the site to the
Commissioners. '
t: ;`=,;�:;:
;s:;;.a
Darrell Henrietta, 6988 - 38th Street, Sunnyslope; rose o
''"" object to the proposal. He contended that there isn't
N �='`��� enough parking for a grocery store. Mr. Henrietta said he
:;��t;l>;:
was also opposed to a zone change from residentia o
-';i;�;:.'
commercial to build the store.
�,r,•;
Ladonna Stevens, 3547 Louise, Lynwood, CA., said there is
already too much pedestrian traffic at the corner of
`�'��^ Road and Long Beach Boulevard. She said the residential
�"""'`'�" zoning should be maintained. Mrs. Stevens remarked that
��':r'; Viva Market which is under construction is only a few blocks
:;;;;>s!`v; away. ,
_ Rose Haywood-Carter said the parking 1 She said
i%;'"�i 1� store will be next to her property.
"'%'��' freeway is under construction, all of these things will ruin I
" �;-G the neighborhood.
: sr:; I
��i7r: �oi.'
:?:` Mi Catteles, 3545 Lynwood Road, Lynwood, CA., spoke in
;r;�`:? support of the market. She said her father also wanted the �
market. Her father was not at the meeting. I
:�;,;�i:�;' Richard Caballa, 3525 Lynwood Road, Lynwood, CA., said he
1
_= objected to the proposal for the same reasons the other i
`��''"'=% spokespersons,had given. He said a phone had been installed �
;z-:Es� '
in the laundromat and drug dealers already congregate there.
He said he felt the subject location is the wrong site for a i
market because of the cul-de-sac and the adjacent
�.� residential properties. !
�;;�:�: i
_ I
Louis Ross, P.O. Box 1092 Beverly Hills, CA., owner of the I
property, said he has a petition signed by 300 people in the
neighborhood who want the grocery store. Mr. Ross commented ,
�!:::�';`�; that the market will sell fresh meats, produce, fish and �
other grocery items. He remarked that he preferred a 10,000 �
square foot market, but has been forced to cut the floor ,
;�;u;?;;,� area down to approximately 7,200 square feet. i
:c>:; :.:::
%'% ' There being no further comments from the audience, �
µ,ii;}- Chairperson Dove asked for comments from the Commissioners. I
^;.:: ,;;. �
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner
^`'`'�' Cole-Dennis to continue Case No. 88030 to the next regular
:s._;:: ,;
meeting of the Planning Commission on August 9, 1988.
I
.:�.�; �f ��� :' . 1
!.^tiY:.^,.i �
''i;�i'_ d� <i
^ j,� �
I
I
'"'`"�"' M3:PC071288 I
;z%.'•""::: - ,
-'1:}ii:.:i '' i
CO:::':b:.:[ I
%;;,;Iti � ( - I
Y:Yl� :' I
>�".5�.':r'� .'.Y : �
.
r:�,' :i
rii:."''
:iy; �:?
:�:;�:? MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Haynes,
Penalber, Pryor and Willis
':.%';:'
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
�=�;�:
ABSTAIN: NONE
5. Tentative Parcel Map - Case No. 88039
10115-10211 Long Beach Boulevard (Ben Safyari)
�
:y:,,.. a
Ms. Tilford presented the staff report indicating as
" follows:
~^^'"� The applicant is requesting tentative parcel map approval in
order to operate a bona fide restaurant. The Conditional
Use Permit for the bona fide restaurant was approved by the
Planning Commission a few months ago. One of the conditions
imposed was that the applicant file a parcel map.
Chairperson Dove opened the public hearing. Ben Safyari,
215 S. La Cienega, Suite 100, Beverly Hills, California,
90211, Project Engineer, rose to state the Parcel Map
approval is a requirement under the Conditional Use Permit
already granted.
s;;,;'f' Chairperson Dove asked if anyone wished to speak for or
against the project.
Maria-Elena Romero, 11331 Plaza Avenue, Facilities Planner,
r%=�:= Lynwood Unified School District, rose to state she received
%� a letter on this date that said.this particular project
�'''�" would come before the Commission on August 9, and asked her I
';���`?: to contribute comments. She requested that she receive the
information earlier and wants more than just the letter and
the map. She would like the entire agenda package. This
problem was discussed further between Ms. Romero, Mr. I
'v;;.%'; ::
Karefa-Johnson, Ms. Tilford, Chairperson Dove and
a-;4;•':; Commissioner Haynes.
;,';,:;: ;.';% �
�'' There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairperson Dove I
'-' ' closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis stated her opposition because there (
are already three developments under construction in the i
area. j
s`" ° Direthea Tilford stated the Conditional Use Permit has �
already been approved and this map is a condition required �
- by the Conditional Use Permit approval. •
Commissioner Penalber stated he has always been opposed to
the project. '
. �,:. �
Mr. Barnes stated the only thing before the Commission at �
"�`.�. this time is whether these lots should be:combined into one
.::. .�
_�'' ' parcel. He said the discussion of the use is not
appropriate, since that was decided at the Conditional Use
Permit hearinq. I
I
� I
i
;;' . . I
DISK M3:PC071288 I
�
':;' :
�
-
�
;?�:' i ; :
%;r;;i'��� _ I
:n;- . .
y °i �._ ' �� - I
..:... .. . I
�,;G�'.
Y'n"�i
MOTION by Commissioner Pryor to adopt Resolution No. 2200,
"�;-z= "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
`'ti3:
LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19843 TO COMBIN
LOTS 120, 121, 122, 123,' 124 AND A PORTION OF LOT 125 AT
?::"r%"� 10115 THROUGH 10211 LONG BEACH BOULEVARD, IN THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 53, PAGE 100 OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY." MOTION SECONDED by
�r�;::ii?
Commissioner Haynes.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Haynes, Penalber,
.;,� �>^ Pryor
;»'::; :=
;.: ..:: NOES : None
-3, '= ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Willis
6. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88041
11314 Louise Avenue (Manuel Valladares)
Applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to build five
apartments at subject address in the R-3 (Multiple-Family
s' Residential) zone. ' �
� ' Mr. Carter stated the five units include a 25� density bonus I
unit. The site is surrounded on three sides by multiple- i
- family residential areas, and manufacturing on the� east
`}_ ?< side, but the immediate area is a single-family
����� �`� neighborhood.
Mr. Barnes stated that there is no requirement for the ;
"' developer to provide units for lower income families; �
J .:' I
>:za.� however, the developer cannot have the 25� density without '
;�.,.;: this requirement, under State law. � I
;,�;_. ;
_ Commissioner Haynes immediately asked if the City is abiding f
with State laws. I
�. Mr. Karefa-Johnson replied that in the past, the Planning �
'' Commission and staff have approved too many units, but now �
'r<;':'.;;
the number of units allowed has been reduced to be in
',';', conformance with State law. He will present a status report
of the number of units approved under Staff Comments later �
sz';,;;.; durinq this meeting. i
'w,`�! Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing. . I
x,.�:
;?;:.-. -.:; I
" Manuel Valladares, who is one of the owners, and lives at i
-:�r''<; 3168 Live Oak, Huntington Park, stated that for them to come
out financially, there must be five units. He will not be
':```='.: an onsite owner, but will have an onsite manager. They are '
'"t=:» providing 25� landscaping, and promise to build the units �
;%'?:,,�:: by City standards. He stated his opinion that the units �
-.>:a��:� would improve the neighborhood, but there will be no place �
for the children to play. '
�'`'`' Chairperson Dove asked about the facade on the front �
-�;,r;;.' i �
building, and Mr. Valladares replied the front will be �
landscaped, enclosed, and self-maintained. �
I
�z::;'':=;� I
7:: -:,;:;
;;: :� s
,: ::s.:::
- �
-- , i
DISK M3:PC071288 ,
,
8 '
i
"•f FT^' � ; ��� I
':"::al '. I
xi `... ...., i
Mr. Valladares discussed his problems concerning the fact
that the property is in a flood zone area. He plans to
build the apartments above garages so any.possible tlooding
will not occur in living quarters. He further explained
that the plans presented to the Commissioners are not the
ones that will be used, because of the required�flood zone
treatment. He aqain stated the landscaping will be 25�, not
31�, and a playqround will not be provided, but he is
willing to work with staff on this.
Commissioner Haynes asked if one unit will be for
lower/moderate income residentes. Mr. Carter replied that
City staff has not been aggressive concerning the
low/moderate unit required, because almost everything in
Lynwood is low or moderate.
Mr. Valladares questioned staff concerning Item No. 32 of
the requirements, for the, undergrounding of all utilities.
Mr. Devore replied that Mr. Valladares and the Edison
Company will have to work that out to Edison Company's
satisfaction.
Commissioner pove asked if anyone in the audience wished to
speak for or against the proposal, there being no one, he
closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Barnes stated the applicant could enter into an
agreement with the City.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis stated that different pages of the
=;;�2 proposal don't go together. , '
� Mr. Carter and Mr. Devore explained that the building pads �
'<``�; must be raised to accommodate the flood zone area, not the �
entire lot.
,; Commissioner Pryor stated his disapproval of trash cans
right in front of the lot and the applicant stated they
could be relocated to the rear of the lot.
� Commissioner Cole-Dennis stated that a letter had been
.�+ :;;;; received from the school board. 5he further stated that she
i: doesn't like the layout of the land and that she wants a
`' play area for the children�.
.a3r, :.;:
d;
Mr. Carter agreed that the landscaped area will be unusual,
,'; but the applicant exceeds the 25� requirement:
' Commissioner Pryor stated that the proposed units will face
a wide street. The schools are always overcrowded, he
,: added, and perhaps enough overcrowding will force the school
;"FS;; administration to provide more schools.
Commissioner Penalber agreed with Commissioner Pryor. I
Commissioner Haynes asked the applicant what the front of
'�'`` the building will look like and the applicant replied that
<.
it will be covered with stucco and bay windows.
! Commissioner Pryor wanted to know more abcut the flood zone
so Mr. Devore showed him a map. i
I
::%.�°_:
��
DISK M3:PC071288 I
9
�"�
�°.r ,
>,'`'x-:s
x ` ;:::
�;=:::s:;
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner
Pryor, to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2201, "A RESOLUTION OF THE
:;�';;i PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING
- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88041 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
='r�� FIVE (5) UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING AT 11314 LOUISE AVENUE,
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, IN THE R-3 (MULTIPLE-FAMILY
��;;�:-�' RESIDENTIAL) ZONE," and find that said permit will not
cause a significant environmental impact in the surrounding
;;;`;� area, and certify the Negative Declaration as adequate, with
v%'"= attachment that allows density bonus as long as applicant
;Zr%;':: reached agreement with the City of Lynwood.
�%�;;;�
MOTION carried by the following vote:
'<;;;;�
AYES: Commissioner Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penalber, Pryor
:'.�'��:1.�:�'.�
=.f"�-.: NOES: Commissioner Willis
r;:;:
;;';;;; ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
�.�C+ 4 ii. '
ABSTAIN: None
�;:��: .
7. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88042
11230 Louise Avenue (Jose Rodriquez/Sergio Lopez)
Applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to build four
(4) apartments at the rear of an existing single-family
dwelling in the R-3 (Multiple-family residential) zone.
�;;-, Mr. Barnes stated that since a density bonus unit is,,again I
included, that he would want the same condition of an
agreement between applicant and City of Lynwood as the �
_ previous case. �
i
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing, but neither the �
applicant nor his representative was present. I
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner
Cole-Dennis to continue Case No. 88042 to the August 9, I
1988, meetinq of the Planning Commission so the applicant
can be present. I
MOTION carried by the following vote: I
i
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penalber, Pryor,
Willis
NOES: None �
ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka I
>-� i:- � ;
-?�� ABSTAIN: None �
: =-x,; I
>a,":: I
��%%;1=; 8. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88043 j
2827 Imperial Highway (Manal Yousif) '
�
;�'; ;- I
Applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to open a mini-
market with beer and wine sales at the subject address in
-;�;:;:? the C-3 (Heavey Commercial) zone.
Ms. Tilford commented that a letter of opposition was j
received by the City from the Sheriff's Department. Then i
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing and Mr. i
Dassmalla, cousin to the applicant, 14700 Atlantic Avenue,
Compton, CA. 90221, rose to state that there are no I
houses, no schools, and no churches nearby, as this is �
absolutely a commercial zone. He stated the family accepts '
� == all conditions. !
r :::' I
DISK M3:PC071288 i
10 �
, I
i
,. �
s;' < ' '
Senita Yousif, 709 S. Alondra, Los Angeles, CA. 90005, rose
to state that this will be a family affair, only adults will
work. All members of the family raised $75,000.00 to open
this business and they plan to do anything required to make
:`;:sa it a success; and they will have all security needed to
- protect themselves and their investment.
Alzmal Allia, 14700 Atlantic Avenue, Compton, CA. 90221,
stated the family looked for two months to find this
�':::;r
location.
- ;
=-=% Theresa Yousif, 6410 Green Valley Circle, Culver City,
`""'"' stated they will all work there, adults only. It will be a
'C 4:�
good store, the only store there except for a small market
nearby. They will have a large variety of foods, soda,
coffee, fresh produce and a small meat area. They plan to
sell Mexican food, the Los Angeles Sentinel and La Opinion.
:;:_: "'
;:%::',; Amad Yousif, Los Angeles, CA. 90004, repeated the
statements already made.
There was a general discussion between the Commissioners
concerning the closeness of the proposed mini-market to
''`��'- Hercules Hamburgers, the closeness to other proposed
restaurants, and number of parkinq spaces. Ms. Tilford
stated there will be 22 parking spaces, which was deemed to
be adequate by the Site Plan Review Committee at the time
:=;:' ;
the shopping center was built.
Mr. Karefa-Johnson stated the presence of the mini-market in,
the commercial zone has already been approved; the Planning
Commission is asked for its approval of the beei�/wine
>�`;;:;'':. license. Mr. Devore stated the street will be realigned
"•";; ( widened ) by the State .
���;��;
--<<,': Commissioner Penalber stated his approval of the mini-
-_%%:.%� market, but he doesn't like the proliferation of alcohol in
`;%'[''<": the heavily-populated area. He noted that a letter of
=:;;';i,.:;: opposition had been received by the City from the Sheriff's
�%% Department.
%";=;;,,
' T.v / :
:� '!%
Commissioner Haynes commented that there are no liquor
stores in that area, but there are nine near the high
=F'-�;`= school, also liquor stores abound on Imperial Highway and
Long Beach Boulevard.
Theresa Yousif rose to say the family plans to open the
''<�` store early and close early. There will be no one-drink
;,,; ;�;
.'n:: sales on the property. The planned hours are 7:00 a.m. to
"'��:::?� 9:00 p.m., as listed under Condition No. 14. She further
�:;;:. z
stated their willinqness to provide a cleaning crew for t e
'� � parking lot. They expect to keep the parkinq lot clean at
all times, and will accept that as Condition No. 17a, if
"''-.� this is agreeable with the Commission.
The rest of the family, who were seated, voiced their
' agreement with Ms. Yousif.
:%�� ::%.
%'�"��' There being no one else wishing to speak either for or
.•<:;..,., I
`==�'"� against the proposal, Chairperson Dove closed the Public
�;. �:. ;;
�= %% Hearing. I
:r:=-s'- i
_
��
i
:�:?:;:-:
�
�
�
�
-';:<: �:=
' DISK M3:PC071288 �
�
�
" 11
I
?s�;':;%'_.
I;�=i;�Z;-
y
;;�::: , .
MOTION by Commissioner Haynes, SECONDED by Commissioner
Penalber, to find that Conditional Use Permit, Case No.
"`'`'�'%%' 88043 is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines, and approve Resolution No. 2204, "A RESOLUTION
- OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING
��� A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO OPEN A MINI-MARKET WITH
r:-4; ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES (BEER. AND WINE) IN THE C-3 (HEAVY
COMMERCIAL) ZONE, 2827 IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, LYNWOOD,
CALIFORNZA," with Condition No. 17a.
/ii-�
MOTION carried by the followinq vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penalber, Pryor
� NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
=�:�:-
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Willis
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS
?f;r.;.
None
::;; Si;
STAFF COMMENTS
6 "�� �
"`''``"` Mr. Karefa-Johnson read Item No. 1. On Item No. 2, he commented
that the helistop ordinance was.pulled by Council. He stated
that the ordinance to expand Redevelopment Project Area "A" was
�``�' approved. On Item No. 3, he commented that the multiple-family
residential zone study will be completed in time fox� the
- September meeting of the Planning Commission.
!'J.'.:^..^. I
I
:-�%%:"? COMMISSION ORALS I
;:-.:;.�:.
W'�`~ Commissioner Penalber stated there will be a joint meeting with �
>;r�;_:;
`��''>'= the school board at the school at 7:00 p.m., and attendance by �
' the Commissioners would be appreciated. He also stated he wants I
:�i';5<-:� a plaque or somethinq of recognition from the City Council i
s"'` presented to Eugene Raymond. Mr. Karefa-Johnson stated the �
`--�-'� plaque was ordered and will be presented by the City Manager, Mr. !
= Charles Gomez. �
;' :=z
:%r.'�:^ Commissioner Cole-Dennis stated Ray Chavera has moved, so, since i
he won't be attending any more Planning Commission meetinqs, she
would like a certificate given to him by the Commissioners.
i
_ Commissioner Pryor commented that the end of Cortland (where it I
is blocked off near the freeway) is being used as a storage spot ,
u�`' for cars and is littered with trash. Mr. Karefa-Johnson listed i
the number of things Code Enforcement officers must do before �
r%;:°:= this matter will be referred to the City Attorney. I
"�`tt-" Commissioner Haynes wants 4040 Beechwood maintained property. He I
said it now looks like a weedfest and is owned by an LAPD ,
employee who refuses to maintain it. He added that citizens have I
mentioned to him that they would like to see Commissioner Kanka I
receive a plaque from the City for her years of service. He i
expressed his satisfaction at seeing Commissioner Cole-Dennis at
the meeting. '
I
- PUBLIC ORALS I
:-�; -i;;:
.,..
None (
;-:>:'�•` DISK M3:PC071288 �
I
�
12 !
�
;... _ . I
*' '''` ADJOURNMENT :
-,r-..
MOTION was made to adjourn by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by
Commissioner Haynes, and carried unanimously to adjourn to the
:':;`.�; next regular meeting of the Planning Commission at 7:30 p.m.,
City Hall Council Chambers, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood,
:-�;; California, 90262. The meeting was adjourned at 10:40 p.m.
`>:1s
" APPROVED AND WRITTEN this 9th day of Auqust, 1988.
z:<-;;:
`:;;<>
�`�?�; Donald Dove, Chairperson
z:<�-.
iii:5k
ATTEST:
';:;<
`:,i5 Kenrick Karefa-Johnson
�`� Acting Secretary
;�:;;:,
�.Y.�1
%�N.'....
. I"'., I
" .f
Y '!� .:
I%�! ]
S ^%�Y
R 'NJ.I:
.':':f� .�(
:�F'1.�'.,^
-'.,:� �,.'i: .
I
�,`� '� i
1 .'�GS:l.�'.
'f.' •
' �
.�:���.��:
I
.�� `.". I
'.'I?�i:
I
I
�
'�' /�'�� �.:
DISK M3:PC071288 �
i
i: ;= ,
`:'`f� I
i�' �'' 13 I
r;..::
-:
�:�
a'J, i