HomeMy Public PortalAboutA 1989-05-09 PLANNING COMMISSION � �� ' U
; `
i A G E N D A
,,?
LYNWOOD CITY PL:�u�iNING COMMISSION
{ REGULAR MEETING - 7:30 P.M. �
City Hall Council Chambers •
;, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, CA.
' � �� t;z
+� �
May 9, 1989 �`
�C������ I
�CITY OF LYNWn��
CI"fY CLERKS OFF�CE
g MAY �`�
. . A � PM
Donald A. Dove q�g
Chairperson �
�
� ��1�
Lena Cole-Dennis
Commissioner
John K. Haynes Roy Pryor
Commissioner Commissioner
;
Lucille Kanka David J. Willis, Jr.
Commissioner Commissioner
, C O,M M I S S I O N C O U N S E L:
Henry S. Barbosa Douglas D. Barnes
City Attorney Deputy City Attorney
STAFF:
Vicente L. Mas, DirectoY Art Barfield
Community Development Department Planning Associate
Aubrey D. Fenderson Andrew B-Pessima
Planning Manager Planning Technician
DISK 47:AGENCOVR
I ,
� � .
1
� _
��..
�. "day 9, 1989
OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Call meeting to order.
B. Flag Salute.
C. Roll Call of Commissioners.
D. Certification of Agenda posting.
E. Approval of Minutes of March 14, 1989 and April 11, 1989
Planning Commission meetings.
F. Swearing in of New Commissioners.
G. Reorgani2ation of Planning Commission
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING:
1. Conditional Use Permit Case No. 2
� 11300 Spruce Street (Lynwood Unified School District)
Comment
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to
construct a two-story Administrative Office Building in the
� R-2 Zone.
Recommended Action
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the
Planninq Commission adopt Resolution No. 2256.
A. Finding that Conditional Use Permit Case No. 2 carries
out the intent of Ordinance No. 1318.
B. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit No. 2, will not
have a significant effect on the environment and
certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate.
C. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2, subject to the
stated conditions and requirements.
2. Variance Case No. 2
10971 San Vicente Avenue (Ceneyda Reyes)
' Comment
The applicant is requesting a Variance in order to provide
only three (3) attached one-car garages to serve three
residential units in the R-3 zone.
' Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests, that after consideration, the
Planning Commission continue this item to the next regular
� meeting of the Planning Commission on June 13, 1989.
DISK 7:AGENDA
' 1
•3. Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case No. 2
� City Wide
; Comments•
� The Staff is proposing to Amend Chapter 25, the official
Zoning Ordinance with respect to property maintenance
. standards city wide.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests, that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission continue Zoninq Ordinance Amendment Case
No. 2 to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission
on June 13, 1989.
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS
�4. Conditional Use Permit Case No. 9
' 11265 Louise Avenue (Joseph Chang)
Comment
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to
develop a five unit apartment complex in the R-3 zone.
Recommended Action
Staff respectfully requests, that after consideration, the
Planning Commission
A. Adopt the attached Resolution No. 2271 with the
conditions to 1) Develop three (3), three (3) bedroom
units, and two (2), two (2) bedroom units; and 2)
provide more useable open space.
1. The project is categorically exempt from the provisions
of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section
15061b (3).
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 9 subject to
the stated conditions and requirements.
OR
B. Deny Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 9, as proposed by
the applicant
5. Conditional Use Permit Case No. 11
3287 Lynwood Road (Estela Mayans)
Comment
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to
develop an 18 unit apartment complex in the R-3�zone.
Recommended Action
Staff respectfully requests, that the Planning Commission remove
this item from the Agenda because of an inconsistent
desiqnation and zoning classification of the General Plan and
Zoning Map. ,
� DISK 7:AGENDA
2
I
I —
,i,
a
6. Conditional Use Permit Case No. 12
11670 Virginia Avenue (Sergio Lopez)
Conunent
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to
develop two two-story townhouses in the R-2 zone.
Recommended Action
Staff respectfully request that this item be removed from the
agenda until such time that the applicant decides to go ahead
with the proposed project.
7. Tentative Parcel Map No. 21029
Northwestern corner of Long Beach Boulevard at Cedar Avenue
(Robert Terrell)
Comment
The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Parcel
Map (No. 21029) for the consolidation of three parcels
located at 12102 Long Beach Boulevard, in the C-2A zone.
Recommended Action
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2274
P:. The project is categorically exempt from the provisions
of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section
15061b(3).
B. Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 4, subject to the
stated conditions and requirements.
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS
STAFF COMMENTS
Update on General Plan revision.
COMMISSION ORALS
PUBLIC ORALS
ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
June 13, 1989, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall Chambers, 11330 Bullis
Road, Lynwood, California.
`
I DISK 7:AGENDA
I
� 3
I
� f '
r MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
� PLANNING COMMISSION
� _ . ._.
. �,.ri'_ �•. _..__:;��.,:���, i.:Al,ir�u.:iviw
TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 1989
OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Call to order
The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of
Lynwood was called to order by Chairperson Dove on the above
captioned date at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City
Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California 90262.
B. Pledge of Allegiance
Commissioner Willis led the Pledge of Allegiance.
C. Roll Call of Commissioners
Chairperson Dove requested the roll call, and Planning
Division Fenderson complied.
Present: Commissioner ponald A. Dove
Commissioner Lena Cole-Dennis
Commissioner Alberto M. Penalber
Commissioner David J. Willis, Jr.
Mr. Fenderson informed the Commissioners that Commissioner Kanka
had requested an excused absence, Commissioner Haynes had
reguested an excused absence because of an operation on his foot,
and Commissioner Pryor requested an excused absence because he is
out of town.
MOTION by Commissioner Penabler, SECONDED by Commissioner Willis,
to grant all three Commissioner an excused absence. MOTION carried
unanimously.
Also present: Douglas Barnes, Deputy City Attorney
Aubrey Fenderson, Planning Manager
Arthur Barfield, Planning Associate
Andrew B-Pessima, Planning Technician
Vicente L. Mas, Community Development Director
John Oskoui, Civil Engineering Assistant
Joy Valentine, Minutes Clerk
Approximately twenty-five people were in the audience.
D. Certification of Agenda Posting
Mr. Fenderson stated that, per the Brown Act, the agenda had
been duly posted.
E. Approval of Minutes
MOTION by Commissioner Penabler, SECONDED by Commissioner Willis,
to approve the minutes of January 10, 1989. MOTION carried by the
following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penabler, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Haynes, Kanka, Pryor
ABSTAIN: None
Disk 5: PCO31989
1
_ J
I
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner
Willis, to approve.the minutes of February 14, 1989.
� MOTION carried by the followina vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penabler, Willis
NOES: None �
ABSENT: Commissioners Haynes, Kanka, Pryor
ABSTAIN: None
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Sign Ordinance Amendment - Case No. 88100
Citywide
Staff proposes to amend Chapter 25, the official Zoning and
Sign Ordinance, to control construction of free standing pole
signs Citywide. This matter was continued from the February
14, 1989, Plarming Cmmnission meeting to allow staff more time
for evaluation. At the December 20, 1988, meeting of the City
Council, an urgency ordinance establishing a moratorium on the
construction, erection.and.installation of free standing signs
was adopted.
Chairperson Dove discussed the City of South Gate's
design requirements as indicated on the survey page. Mr.
Fenderson reminded the Commissioners of a previous case
involving World Savings and Loan and McDonald's. Mr.
Fenderson stated that on premises freestandinq signs
would be illegal per this ordinance.
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing. There being
no one wishing to speak in favor or in opposition to the
proposed ordinance amendment, Chairperson Dove closed the
Public Hearing.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis complimented staff on their report
and stated her approval. Chairperson Dove also stated his
approval.
MOTION made by Coimnissioner Cole-Dennis to adopt Resolution
No. 2254, finding that Sign Ordinance Amendment, Case No.
SS100, will not have a significant effect on the environment,
certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate, recommending
that the City Council approve the findings in Resolution No.
2254, waive the reading and introduce the proposed ordinance,
SECONDED by Commissioner Willis.
MOTZON carried 37y the following vote:
AYES: Cortvnissioners.Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penalber, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Convnissioners Haynes, Kanka, Pryor
ABSTAIN: None
2. Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case No. 1
Citywide
Staff proposes to amend Chapter 25, the official Zoning
Ordinance, with respeci to parking standards Citywide.
Disk S:PCO31489
2
Mr. Fenderson requested that this case be continued to the
' next regularly scheduled meeting to the Planning Commission on
� April 11, 1989, because staff has not come to a final draft.
� MOTION by Commissioner Penabler,SECONDED by Commissioner Cole-
...., ,_, „
Dennis, to continue Zoning Oru.i..a-' :::. .. .;:r3s4'.'::�� �.-- ..-:, to
the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning
Commission on April 11, 1989.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Cammissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penalber, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Haynes, Kanka, Pryor
ABSTAIN: None
3. Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case No. 2 Regulating Property
Maintence Citywide
Staff proposes to amend Chapter 25, the official Zoning and
Ordinance, with respect to Nuisance and Property Maintenance
Citywide.
Mr. Fenderson requested that Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case
No. 2 be continued to the next regularly scheduled meeting of
the Planning Commission on April 11, 1989, SECONDED by
Commissioner Cole-Dennis.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penalber, Willis
" NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Aaynes, Kanka, Pryor
ABSTAIN: None
4. Modification to Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 85075 (CUP 1)
11331 Wright Road, Lynwood (Jose L. Lopez)
Applicant requests approval of a modification to Conditional
Use Permit No. 85075 in order to build an additional one-story
two-bedroom unit in the R-3 zone at above address.
Applicant has not resubmitted another plan to address the
problems discussed previously with staff and the
Commissioners. Therefore, staff requests that this item be
continued to the Planning Commission's regularly scheduled
meeting of April 11, 1989.
MOTION by Commissioner Penabler, SECONDED by Commissioner
Willis, to continue Modification to Conditional Use Permit -
Case No. 85075, to the Planning Commission's regularly
scheduled meeting of April 11, 1989.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penalber, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Haynes, Kanka, Pryor
ABSTAIN: None
Disk S:PCO31489
3
5. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 5
11004 Harris Avenue, Lynwood (Sergio Lopez)
Applicant requests approval t� buiad f�t.r ^i!?�_ _
the R-3 zone.
Two parties, the applicant and an alleged new owner, both -
claim ownership of the property. Neither has proven his case
to satisfaction of staff so the applicant, Mr. Sergio Lopez,
has requested that Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 5 be
continued to the Planning Commission's next regularly
scheduled meeting on April 11, 1989.
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner
Cole-Dennis, to continue Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 5
to the Planning Commission's next regularly scheduled meeting
on April, 1989.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penalber, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Haynes, Kanka, Pryor
ABSTAIN: None
At this point, staff requested that the Commissioners hear
Agenda Item No. 8 because citizens involved in that case work
evenings and will have to leave soon.
6. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 8
10404 Long Beach Boulevard (Yi Chin Su)
Mr. B-Pessima noted that the population of the City of Lynwood
is 54,000 and at this time 97 liquor licenses have been issued.
This averages to 18 liquor stores in every square mile of
Lynwood. It is the opinion of staff that granting this CUP will
adversely affect the community. The Site Plan Review Committee
recommended that the Planning Commission deny the permit. Mr. B-
Pessima also noted that presently there are twelve
establishments in the general area of the subject site selling
liquor. He distributed a letter of appeal received from the
applicant to the Commissioners. �
Vice=Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing and Rod Archer
representative of CLR Enterprises, Inc. 3540 Wilshire
Boulevard, Suite 603, Los Angeles, California, 90010, rose to
speak in favor of the project for his client, Mr. Yi.
Mr. Archer stated that Mr. Yi had been in business in that
same spot for six years without a single problem. Mr. Yi was
forced to surrender use of his beer and wine license in August
1987, because the owner of the property decided to redevelop
the site. Mr. Yi fully intended to reopen his market upon
completion of the redevelopment, but the developer did nothing
to protect the C.U.P. Mr. Archer, stated that extremely
extenuating circumstances surround this application, which
should be dealt with equitably and fairly. Mr. Yi should have
had his license grandfathered into the redevelopment by the
developer, but somehow, perhaps due to language barriers, this
was not done. Mr. Archer reiterated that this is not a new
license.
Disk S:PCO31489
4
An extensive discussion ensued. Mr. Mas stated that when
physical surroundings are changed, a new �.U-�. m�ast be
obtained. Mr. Fenderson stated that existinq City policy is to
eliminate stores selling liquor when possible because of the
present proliferation of stores selling liqour within City
limits. Mr. Archer insisted that the issuance of a C.U.P. is
a discretionary action and this particular case requires
equity and fairness. Chairperson Dove asked if there
aren't special arrangements for malls. Mr. Mas replied
yes, but only in malls of five acres or more.
Mrs. Suzie Woo, 831 Fifth Avenue, Los Angeles, rose to state
that this is her brother's business and she worked there
previously. Mr. Yi lived in front of the store and kept
constant watch over it, he cleaned graffiti and maintained
lower prices. His only problem was language, she stated.
Delbert Robertson, 3202 Tenaya, Lynwood, stated he is a
property owner since 1973 and there were no problems of any
kind during the six years Mr. Yi operated the market.
Esau Morales, 3275 Tenaya, Lynwood, stated Mr. Yi was a good
market operator who kept everything clean.
Westa Morales, 3275 Tenaya, Lynwood, stated Mr. Yi had a clean
market with no problems.
There being no one else wishing to speak in favor of the
proposal, Vice-Chairperson Dove asked if anyone wished to
speak against the proposal.
Jane Semone, 3153 Sequoia Street, on the South Gate/Lynwood
border, stated she lived in the neighborhood for 23 years and
conditions have changed since there was only a market at that
location. Now there is a hamburger stand, a laundromat, and
other facilities. Beer and wine sales will cause problems at
those adjoining businesses, she stated.
Mr. Archer returned to the podium to restate essentially what
he had said before.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Vice-Chairperson
Dove closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Mas stated that Mr. Yi had to surrender his license
because he had no place of business. Mr. Archer restated that
Mr. Yi had surrendered his license voluntarily because he
intended to reopen his market when the remodeling was
finished.
Commissioner Penalber stated he couldn't understand why Mr. Yi
didn't check into this matter before he signed a lease.
Mr. Fenderson stated he couldn't understand why Mr. Yi wasn't
as diligent with the City of Lynwood as he was with the ABC
District.
Mr. Archer said it is unfair to speculate on why Mr. Yi didn't
come to the City, the important thing is that he surrendered
his license with the intent of reopeninq. He simply didn't
understand that he would have to do anything other than
reapply with the ABC District.
Disk S:PCO31489
5
Chairperson Dove stated that this is not an easy case for
' him to decide one way or another since he can see both
the hardship for Mr. Yi and yet he wants to stop
proliferation of business selling liquor. Commissioner
Penalber stated that he is in the same position. Vice-
Chairperson Dove asked staff if Mr. Yi could use the '
license in another location and Mr. Mas replied in the
affirmative.
Commissioner Willis stated that his contituency is opposed to
proliferation of businesses selling liquor and besides, it is
contrary to City policy to be in conflict with zoning rules.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis asked staff if ABC contacts the City
when someone surrenders a license and Mr. Fenderson replied in
the negative.
Mr. Archer came to the podium to restate his case one more
time, this time adding that staff should have informed both
the applicant and the developer what the procedures are.
Commissioner Willis stated . it was the developer's
responsibility to see that the C.U.P. was protected. Mr.
Fenderson agreed, stating that the developer did not follow
through on his responsibilities.
Mr. Barnes stated that the issue is not who should have done
what, the issue is that the City is against proliferation of
liquor stores. He added that Mr. Archer has not claimed that
Mr. Yi will suffer great hardship and also has not explained
why Mr. Yi will suffer great hardship and also has not
explained why Mr. Yi delayed in requesting the C.U.P.
Commissioner Willis asked Mr. Archer if Mr. Yi would suffer
great hardship because the bulk of his sales are beer and wine
sales. Mr. Archer replied that the bulk of Mr. Yi sales are
not beer and wine, but that community members support the
market as shown by the people present at the meeting.
MOTION by Commissioner Penabler, SECONDED by Commissioner
Willis, to deny the request for Conditional Use Permit - Case
No. 8, finding that the C.U.P. request falls short of
Ordinance No. 1306 and denying the C.U.P. as it will adversely
affect the City's General Plan.
MOTZON carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Penalber, Willis
NOES: Commissioner Cole-Dennis
ABSENT: Commissioners Aaynes, Kanka, Pryor
ABSTAIN: None
Chairperson Dove told Mr. Archer that he can appeal the
decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council.
The Commissioners took a two-minute break, after which
Commissioners and staff returned.
7. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 6
3620 Carlin Avenue (Emigdio Carillio)
Applicant requests approval to develop a two-story, four-
bedroom house in the R-2 zone, presently developed with one
single-family residence and an attached single-car garage.
Also on site is a mobile home trailer.
Disk 5:PCO31489
6
• Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing.
Emigdio Carillio, 9420 S. Madison Avenue, South Gate, 90280,
rose to speak but, since he spoke only Spanish, Mr. Mas acted
as interpreter. He accepted all conditions required for .
approval.
Rosa Rios, 3620 Carlin Avenue, owner of the property, rose to
state she doesn't want to have to plant trees because there is
a school nearby and it might be dangerous.
John Oskoui stated it will safe; an inspector will go onsite
and if there is any danger at that time, the trees will be
eliminated.
There being no one else wishing to speak for the proposal,
Chairperson Dove asked if anyone wished to speak against
the proposal.
Irene Weatherbee, who lives at 2317 w. Carlin and owns the
property at 124-25 Bullis Road, rose to state that this
property is adjacent to hers. It is a nice, quiet neighborhood
with no two-story buildings. If the applicant is permitted to
build a two-story building, her view will be blocked from the
bathroom and the bedroom. The new owners removed their trees
and tore down the chain link fence that divided the two
properties. Their dogs run all over her property although the
new owners have now erected an eight (8) foot wooden fence
that was not erected properly.
Mr. Mas stated that one condition of approval is a 6' masonry
wall fence so the wooden fence would have to come down anyway.
Mrs. weatherbee again stated her objections to the two-story
building, the absence of the chain link fence, the dogs and
the trailer. Mr. Barfield stated the trailer will be removed,
this has been agreed between staff and the owner.
Mr. Mas stated the trailer is a Code Enforcement violation and
a Code Enforcement officer will be onsite tomorrow.
Mrs. Weatherbee stated she has seen three different dogs, both
their barking and their messes are offensive. She said the
two-story.building will cut off all breezes.
Mr. Barfield stated that there is an existing two-story
building across the street at the Bullis/Carlin intersection.
Mrs. Weatherbee replied that there is an alleyway next to that
building, not a home.
The applicant returned to the podium to state that there was a
female doq who had puppies are all gone now and there is only
one doq, about 2-foot high, who stays inside the existing
front house. When the bushes and trees were removed, she
stated, "the chain link fence came with them," and she plans
to build a masonry fence.
Cotm[iissioner Cole-Dennis asked if she planned to live in the
new four-bedroom house and the applicant replied in the
affirmative.
There being no one else wishing to speak for or against the
proposal, Vice-Chairperson Dove closed the Public Hearing.
Disk S:PCO31489
7
, Chairperson Dove discussed Item Nos. 11, 14, 15 and 18
�w,f_�;>�_aft snd stated he doesn't see a view problem.
MOTION by Commissioner Penabler, SECONDED by Commissioner
Col'e-Dennis, to adopt Resolution No. 2260, "A RESOLUTION OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSIQN OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 6 TO CONSTRUCT ONE FOUR-BEDROOM,
TWO-STORY RESIDENTIAL UNIT IN THE R-2 20NE, 3620 CARLIN
AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, 90262," finding the project to be
categorically exempt from the State CEQA Guidelines as amended
by Section 15061 b(3) and approving C.U.P. No. 6 subject to
the stated conditions and requirements.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penalber, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Haynes, Kanka, Pryor
ABSTAIN: None
8. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 7
3592 Los Flores Boulevard (Marcos and Guadalupe Arellano)
Applicant requests approval to develop a two-story, two-
bedr000m detached dwelling unit in the R-3 zone.
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing and William
Flores, 2513-1/2 California Avenue, Huntington Park, rose
to state the request was for a three-bedroom unit not a
two-bedroom unit. He stated that the owner accepted all
conditions.
There being no one else wishing to speak either for or against
the proposal, Chairperson Dove closed the Public Hearing.
There was a short discussion between Mr. Barnes, Mr. Barfield,
Chairperson Dove and Mr. Flores concerning the front
treatment of the existing building and it was agreed by all
that Condition No. 15A requiring that the front of the
present house will be made to complement the front of the new
house, will be added to the required conditions.
MOTION by Commissioner Cole-Dennis, SECONDED by Commissioner
Penabler, to adopt Resolution No. 2266, "A RESOLUTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 7 TO CONSTRUCT A THREE-BEDROOM,
TWO-STORY RESIDENTIAL UNIT IN THE r-3 RESIDENTIAL ZONE, AT
3592 LOS FLORES BOULEVARD, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, 90262,"
finding that the project is categorically exempt from the
provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section
15061 b(3) and approving C.U.P. No. 7 subject to the stated
conditions and requirements.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penabler, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Haynes, Kanka, Pryor
ABSTAIN: None
Disk S:PCO31489
8
9. Variance - Case No. 1
10992 Pine Avenue (Lawrence R. and Brenda J. Bible)
Npplicants rc�uest a variance for a five-foot high wrought
iron fence along the front yard setback of their property in
the R-1 zone. Staff recommends denial because a hardship has
not been established and the applicant will not be deprived of •
privileges enjoyed by owners of other properties in the same
vicinity if the variance is denied.
Mr. Fenderson informed the Commissioners that staff had
received a letter of support from their neighbors.
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing.
Brenda Bible, 10992 Pine Avenue, Lynwood, rose to state the
fence has been up since June 1988. Her home is next to a bus
stop at the intersection of Imperial Highway and Pine Avenue.
She stated her problems stem from children from the nearby
Seventh Day Adventist's School who are waiting for the bus, as
well as other bus riders. Her front yard has been used as a
dump for everything from a dead dog in a plastic bag to old
tires. The children have climbed trees in her front yard, torn
up her flower beds and written on her porch. She has come home
on hot days and found people sitting under the trees on her
front yard because of the cooling shade. She used to have a 4'
fence that could be climbed easily and one foot higher made
all the difference. She stated her neiqhbor on the corner of
Pendleton has the same height and type of fence, which is a
combination of wrought iron and masonry. The presence of
fences qives symetrical balance to the block. She stated she
didn't know she needed a permit and the builder never said
anything about it. Her neighbors have complimented her on the
attactive fence.
There being no else wishinq to speak for or against the
variance Chairperson Dove closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Barnes checked with staff to make sure the materials are
not illegal, only the height of the fence and Mr. Fenderson
replied in the affirmative.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis stated she has often wondered who
lives there and asked if a trash can is located nearby. Mrs.
Bible said that there is no trash can, she tries to keep the
area cleaned up herself.
Commissioner Willis stated he understands the problem as he
also lives on a corner lot and, also, Vice-Chairperson Dove,
who once lived on a corner lot.
Both Commissioners Penalber and Dove suggested Mrs. Bible
might turn on a sprinkler from 2:30 to 6:00 p.m., using a
timer. Chairperson Dove asked staff for a textbook solution.
Mr. Fenderson suggested a barrier such as a hedge. Mrs. Bible
replied she had previously tried a hedge and the people beat
it down.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis stated her approval of a variance
permittinq the fence to stay there.
Chairperson Dove asked if the City could get a bus
shelter, would that solve the problem.
Mrs. Bible said it probably wouldn't help, the children would
get tired of sitting down and would still wreck her yard.
Disk S:PCO31489
9
Mr. Oskoui stated that bus shelters have been installed by the
' Public Works Department, mostly in commercial areas, such as
,�pic� ��•-�Y � ��ed 'co Le, and the southwest corner of Atlantic.
He doesn't foresee any bus shelter construction in the very
near future.
MOTION by Commissioner Cole-Dennis, SECONDED by Commissioner
Penabler, to approve Variance Case No. 1, finding that a
hardship has been established and that the other properties in
the same vicinity if the recommendation of denial is upheld.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Penalber
NOES: Commissioners Dove, Willis
ABSENT: Commissioners Haynes, Kanka, Pryor
ABSTAIN: None
Because of the tie, Mr. Barnes stated that the case would be
automatically brought back before the Planning Commission at
its regularly scheduled meeting of April 11, 1989, in hopes
that a fifth commissioner would be present.
Mr. Mas commented that the fence at 10909 Pine was built
previous to the ban of six years ago and was grandfathered in
as non-conforming. He also begged the Commission's indulgence
to permit him to leave, which he did.
10. Varinace Case No. 2
10971 San Vicente Avenue (Ceneyda Reyes)
Applicant requests variance to provide only three attached
one-car garages to serve three residential units in the R-3
zone. Subject property is a substandard lot with three legal
dwelling units. Only three one-car garages have been provided
since 1959. The three units do not meet the standard
requirements of the City's current zoning requirements of the
City's current zoning code with respect to parking and orcha
setbacks. Applicant proposes to enclose an existing p
remodel the living room, kitchen and bath of the sinqle family
house. Site Plan Review Committee recommend denial of the
proposed project, however, applicant has submitted documents
to substantiate his argument about the legality of the three
dwelling units.
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing and Sandra Stream,
a representative of Dunhill Builders, 9585 Slauson Avenue,
Pico Rivera, rose to state that they plan to do the remodeling
on the single family dwelling.
Mr. Fenderson stated the variance request is for parking only,
and has nothinq to do with any of the building or remodeling
thereof.
Commissioner Willis suggested that the proposal be continued
until the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning
Commission on April 11, 1989.
Mr. B-Pessima commented that the applicant cannot expand the
building because of its legal non-conforming status. Mr.
Fenderson agreed with Commissioner Willis that it would be a
good idea to continued the proposal until the April meeting.
Disk 5:PCO31489
10
.�
MOTION by Commissioner Cole-Dennis, SECONDED by Commissioner
� �°, �-" � �N�e No. 2 to the next regularly
i E'1'1ctUil�}'_', �:,; ,..ii�.... . , .:. s� .2ilu �
scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission on April 11,
1989.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penabler, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Haynes, Kanka, Pryor
ABSTAIN: None
11. Tentative Parcel Map No. 20792 - Case TPM 3
4440 Olanda Avenue (Nathaniel Roberson)
Applicant requests approval to consolidate one and three
quarters of parcels into a single parcel in the R-3 zone.
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing and Nathaniel
Roberson, 19202 Bichard, Cerritos, rose to state he hopes the
application will be approved, because he wants to start
construction next week.
Mr. Oskoui stated that no permits will be issued before the
recordation of the parcel map. Mr. Barnes asked Mr. Fenderson
to explain and Mr. Oskoui again said that no permits will be
issued before the parcel map recordation. Mr. Barnes stated
that will take some time and Mr. Fenderson then said said
staff will enter into a covenant agreement as has been done in
the past.
Mr. Eenderson stated the Public Hearing is for the parcel mao
only, the project has already been approved as far as building
goes, but the parcel map had somehow been missed.
There being no one wishing to speak either in favor or in
opposition to the proposal, Chairperson Dove closed the
Public Hearing.
MOTION by Commissioner Penabler, SECONDED by Commissioner
Cole-Dennis, to adopt Resolution No. 2269, "A RESOLUTION OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 20792 TO COMBINE A SUBDIVISION OF LOT
6 AND PORTIONS OF LOT 15 , TRACT NO. 7099, AS RECORDED IN BOOK
101, PAGES 6 AND 7 OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, KNOWN AS 4440 OLANDA AVENUE, LYNWOOD,
CALIFORNIA," finding that it will not have a significant
effect on the environment, and certifying the Negative
Declaration as adequate, subject to stated conditions and
requirements.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penabler, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Aaynes, Kanka, Pryor
ABSTAIN: None
Mr. B-Pessima left the meeting.
Disk S:PCO31489
11
12. Tentative Parcel Ma No. 207902 - Case No. TPM 43
,� _ . - . -� � P.�i � . n^ >nrj C�ntiir,V Boulevard
r H;.'. 70:'... .. .
('George Polycrates)
Applicant requests approval in order to consolidate five
parcels and a portion of another into a single parcel.
Mr. Fenderson stated Condition No. 4, "No grading permit or
building permit shall be issued prior to recordation of final
map or another appropriate instrument approved by the City,
with the office of the Los Angeles County Recorder," should
have been deleted.
Chairperson Dove asked if the present structure will be
demolished and Mr. Barfield. stated that a new development is
proposed, however, the Commission is asked to act only on the
parcel map at this time.
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing and Rick
Dougherty, a representative of George Polygrates, 137 S.
Prospect, Tustin, rose to state their acceptance of all
conditions except Condition No. 4.
There being no one wishing to speak either in favor or in
opposition to the proposal, Chairperson Dove closed the
Public Hearing.
Mr. Barnes questioned the wisdom of dropping Condition No. 4
and both Mr. Barfield and Mr. Fenderson stated that staff will
work with the developer closely.
MOTION by Commissioner Cole-Dennis, SECONDED by Commissioner
Penabler, to adopt Resolution No. 2270, "A RESOLUTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NO. 20790 TO COMBINE LOT 281 EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 23
FEET, SIX INCHES TAEREOF LOTS 282 THROUGH 286, INCLUSIVE, OF
TRACT NO. 15016, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 315, PAGES 40 TO
45 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF LOS
ANGELES COUNTY," finding it will not have a significant effect
on on the environment and is therefore exempt, subject to the
stated conditions and requirements.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penalber, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Haynes, Kanka, Pryor
ABSTAIN: None
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS
There was none.
STAFF COMMENTS
Mr. Fenderson distributed copies of a memorandum comcerning the
General, Plan Update and announcement of a City Council Workshop to
Identify Goals and Objectives of same, to be held on Monday, Mar�o the
1989, from noon to 2:00 p.m., in Room No. 2 at Bateman Hall,
Commissioners.
Disk S:PCO31489
12
_ ,
<<
COMMISSION ORALS
The Commissioners di�c:u5�en ccre atienciance TeUO'fu' Ui iioim�'��ssioner
Cole-Dennis for the period from October 1988 to present and
advised that the said record be included in the minutes. For the
period under review, seven (7) Planning Commission meetings were �
held. Commissioner Cole-Dennis was present at five (5) meetings
and had two (2) unexcused absences.
PUBLIC ORALS-
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION was made to adjourn by Commission Penalber, SECONDED by
Commissioner Cole-Dennis, and carried unanimously. The meeting
adjourned at 10:40 p.m.
APPROVED AS WRITTEN this 19th day of March, 1989.
Donald A. Dove, Chairperson
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Aubrey D. Fenderson, Manager pouglas D. Barnes
Planning Division Deputy City Attorney
Disk S:PCO31489
13
:•,_..--
,
,I
';J MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
' PLANNING COMMISSION
::iPi' �r „sc�P�vvil, CALIE'URNIA
TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 1989
OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Call to order
The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of
Lynwood was called to order by ChairpeYSOn Dove on the above
captioned date at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City
Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California 90262.
B. Pledge of Allegiance
Commissioner Willis led the Pledge of Allegiance.
C. Roll Call of Commissioners
Chairperson Dove requested the roll call, and Planning
Manaqer Fenderson complied.
Present: Commissioner ponald A. Dove
Commissioner Lena Cole-Dennis
Commissioner John K. Haynes
Commissioner Alberto M. Penalber
Commissioner David J. Willis, Jr.
Mr. Fenderson informed the Commissioners that Commissioner Kanka
had requested an excused absence.
MOTION by Commissioner Penabler, SECONDED by Commissioner
Penalber, to grant Commissioner Kanka an excused absence.
MOTION carried unanimously.
Also present: Josefina J. Jaramillo, Attorney
Aubrey Fenderson, Planning Manager
Arthur Barfield, Planning Associate
Andrew B-Pessima, Planning Technician
Vicente L. Mas, Community Development Director
John Oskoui, Civil Engineering Assistant
Joy Valentine, Minutes Clerk
Approximately fifteen people were in the audience.
D. Certification of Agenda Posting
Mr. Fenderson stated that, per the Brown Act, the agenda had
been duly posted.
E. Approval of Minutes
Commissioner Penalber stated that Chairperson Dove was
identified as Vice-Chairperson Dove, starting on the second
page and continuing throughout the minutes. Minutes Clerk
apologized to Chairperson Dove for demoting him. Chairperson
Dove noted a typoqraphical error in the last sentence on page
5, the word "so" should be "do". Commissioner Cole-Dennis
discussed a vote that had been taken during Commission Orals
relating to her attendance.
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner
Willis, to approve the minutes of March 14, 1989, as
corrected. MOTION carried by the following vote:
DISK M5:pc041189
1
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Haynes, Penalber,
Pr,yor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
Chairperson Dove introduced Josephina J. Jaramillo, who acted
as the City Attorney.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Zonina ordinance Amendment - Case No. 1
Citywide
Staff proposes to amend Chapter 25, official Zoning
Ordinance, with respect to parking standards Citywide.
Mr. Fenderson discussed the plan to increase parking
spaces by efficient land usage. He stated that parking
standards are now quite low and the plan is to raise
standards, not impossibly high, but higher than they are
now.
Chairperson Dove and Commissioners Haynes and Penalber
discussed the survey comparing Lynwood to other cities
and specific instances, such as churches, schools, etc.
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing. There being
no one wishing to speak in favor of the proposed
ordinance amendment, Chairperson Dove asked if anyone
wished to speak against the proposed ordinance
amendment.
Gary McGavin, architect of Lynwood Unified School
District, stated that if the City raises parking
standards, the City will lose green space, plus increased
parking standards will discourage usage of mass transit
by encouraging people to use their own cars. He asked
for a copy of the study and staff complied.
Chairperson Dove closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis asked Mr. McGavin, considering
his concerns about mass transit, if he had any
information concerning the RTD in Lynwood. Mr. McGavin
replied in the negative.
Chairperson Dove discussed usaqe of multi-level parking
in larger cities.
Commissioner Haynes commented, concerninq Lynwood High
School, that probably more students than staff inembers
drive cars to the school.
Commissioner Penalber read from the survey, concerning
all schools.
Mr. Mas stated that the City can't go after the fact and
make higher requirements at any of the schools.
DISK MS:PC041189
2
� 1
�
I
Commissioner Aaynes asked if five spaces per classroom
will eliminate parking problems around the new high
school, Mr. iras '���iied tnat the p«:.c�:_, ��'�: l"�:�� 3��•�+
high schools will never be solved.
Mr. McGavin discussed Senate Bill No. AB 1700, which -
will benefit urban schools that are impacted. The bill
provides funds for high rise school buildings and
underground parking, which will maximi2e land usage. He
further stated that City standards will not apply.
MOTION made by Commissioner Pryor to adopt Resolution
No. 2259, "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COI�IlMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LYNWOOD RECONIIdENDING CITY ADOPTZON OF AN
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 25-14 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE WITH
RESPECT TO OFF-STREET PARKING STANDARDS, "finding that
the project is exempt from the provisions of the State
CEQA Guidelines, as amended by Section 15061 b(3) and
recommending that the City Council approve the findings
in Resolution No. 2259, waive the reading and introduce
the proposed ordinance, SECONDED by Commissioner Haynes.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Aaynes,
Penalber, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
2. Zonina Ordinance Amendment Case No. 2
Citywide
Staff proposes to amend Chapter 25, the official Zoning
Ordinance, with respect to property maintenance standards
Citywide.
Mr. Fenderson requested that this case.be continued to the
next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission
on May 9, 1989.
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner
Cole-Dennis, to continue Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case No.
2 to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning ,
Commission on May 9, 1989.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Haynes,
Penalber, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
DISK MS:PC041189
3
, .
3. Modification to Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 85075 (CUP 1)
11333 Wright Road, Lynwood, (Jose L. Lopez)
The applicant had requested a niouitication of CUP Case No. 85u75
to construct one two-bedroom apartment unit at the rear of an
existing triplex in the R-3 zone. However, the applicant has
withdrawn his application and offered his property for sale. �
Mr. Fenderson stated his item should be removed from the agenda.
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber to remove Modification to
Conditional Use Permit- Case No. 85075 (CUP 1) from the agenda,
SECONDED by Commissioner Pryor.
MOTION carried by the following vote: �
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Aaynes, Penalber,
Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
4. Conditional Use Permit -Case No. 5 �
12430 Harris Avenue, Lynwood (Sergio Lopez)
Applicant requests approval to build four apartment units in
the R-3 zone. -
Two parties, the applicant and an alleged new owner, both
claim ownership of the property. Neither has produced the
documents to substantiate ownership, so staff requests that
this matter be tabled until ownership has been proven and the
application is resubmitted by the legal owner.
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner
Haynes, to table Conditional Use Permit- Case No. 5 until
ownership has been established and the application is
resubmitted by legal owner.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Haynes, Penalber,
Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
5. Variance Case No. 1
10992 Pine Avenue (Lawrence R. and Brenda J. Bible)
Mr. Fenderson stated the applicant requested this item be
moved to the end of the aqenda to give her time to be
present. Chairperson Dove asked the Commissioners if there
was any objection, there being none, this item was moved to
the end of the agenda.
6. Variance Case No. 2
10978 San Vicente Avenue (Ceneyda Reyes)
Applicant requests a variance to provide only three attached
one-car garages to serve three residential units in the R-3
zone.
DISK MS:PC041189
4
,
Staff recommended approval of the parking variances only.
The applicant's consultant requested a continuation of the
case for further discussion with staff about remodeling the
front house. Staff has made many attempts to reach the
consultant for said discussion but has bee�� uiiaiile co make
contact. '
Commissioner Haynes asked staff why the item should be �
continued when calls are not returned. Mr. Fenderson
replied that both the applicant and the consultant attended
last month's mee�.ing, then the case was continued to this
month and one month more is acceptable to staff.
MOTION by Co�nissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner
Cole-Dennis, to continue Variance Case No. 2 to the next
regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission on May
9, 1989.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penalber, Pryor,
Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Haynes
7. Zone Change- Case No. 1
11300 Spruce Street (Lynwood Unified School District)
Applicant requests Zone Change from R-2 to CF (Community
Facilities) zone to be consistent with the General Plan
designation of Public Land Uses.
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing. ._
Joe Battle, 4304 Carlin Avenue, Lynwood, member of the
Lynwood Unified School District, rose to speak in favor of
the proposal. He stated that the Lynwood Unified School
District wants to streamline their facilities. Presently,
their staff is housed at four separate locations.
There being no one else wishing to speak in favor of the
proposal, and no one wishing to speak against the proposal,
Chairperson Dove closed the Public Hearing. _
Commissioner Cole-Dennis stated her pleasure in the presence
of Mr. Battle and Mr. McGavin at the Planning Commission
meeting.
Commissioner Penalber stated his desire for rapport between
the Lynwood School District and the City because the future
belongs to the students. He also stated his pleasure in
their presence at the meetinq. .
A booklet concerning the proposed building was distributed to
the Commissioners and members of the audience by Mr. Battle.
Mr. Battle said the School District is Planning to move the
yard complex to Wright Road and applications have been made
for AB 1700 funds to build a multi-floor school building
which will completely eliminate trailers and "temporary"
buildings which, through the years, have become permanent.
DISK MS:PC041189
5
. '
Commissioner Pryor asked if any plans have been made to
update the shop classes and Mr. Battle responded that they
were updated two years ago. However, Mr. Battle added, only
children who are at a higher level academically �_� _�Y�_;,�.�'e'�u
to take shop classes, which are elective classes. Many
students are required to take second math or English classes
and have no class time available for shop classes. •
There being no one else wishing to speak for or against the
proposal, Chairperson Dove closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner Cole-
Dennis, to adopt Resolution No. 2273, "A RESOLUTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD RECOMMENDING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE
OFFICIAL ZONING ORDINANCE, CHANGING THE ZONING ON LOT 900 OF
TRACT NO. 15016 MB PAGES 40 TO 45 OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY
RECORDER OFFICE, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, LOCATED AT 11300 SPRUCE
STREET, DESIGNATED AS ZONE CHANGE NO. 1," and recommending
that the City Council certify the Negative Declaration as
adequate.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Haynes,
Penalber, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
8. Conditional Use Permit Case No. 2
11300 Spruce Street (Lynwood Unified School District)
Applicant proposes to construct a two-story Administrative
Office Building on the Hosler Junior High School site.
Staff requested that this matter be continued to a special
meeting of the Planning Commission on Wednesday, April 26,
1989. Although staff wants to extend total cooperation and
support to the Lynwood Unified School District, problems
still remain such as a requirement for ample parking, one of
the items that must be agreed upon before this proposal can
be approved.
Mr. Battle offered to answer any questions for the
Commissioners.
Mr. Mas stated it would be all right for the Commissioners to
ask questions, but staff will not make a recommendation until
problems have been solved, parking is still critical.
It was agreed the applicants would bring a model of the
proposed inside for the Commissioners to see, after the rest
of the agenda had been concluded.
MOTION by Commissioner Haynes, SECONDED by Commissioner Cole-
Dennis, to continue Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 2 to a
special meeting of the Planning Commission to be held on
Wednesday, April 26, 1989.
Disk MS:pc041189
6
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penalber, Pryor
NOES: None
ABSENT: Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
9. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 10
10978 Duncan Avenue (Elvin Sequeira)
Applicant requests approval to develop a one-story three-
bedroom single family house in the R-2 zone.
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing and Elvin
Sequeira, 6601 State Street, Huntington Park, and the
developer, Alfonso Aria, 8497 California Avenue, South Gate,
rose to state their acceptance of the requirements.
Commissioner Penalber and Mr. Aria discussed the proposed
plans. Commissioner Penalber preferred roses and Mr. Aria
preferred evergreen shrubs. '
There being no one else wishing to speak in favor of, or in
opposition to, the proposal, Chairperson Dove closed the
Public Hearing.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis stated her approval of a single
family dwelling, since usually only multiple units are
proposed.
Commissioner Pryor stated that not too many units could be
built on a 25' lot.
MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner
Penalber, to adopt Resolution No. 2260, "A RESOLUTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING
CONDITION USE PERMIT (CUP) NO. 10 TO CONSTRUCT A ONE STORY
THREE BEDROOM, SINGLE FAMZLY HOUSE IN THE r-2 (TWO-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, AT 10978 DUNCAN AVENUE, LYNWOOD,
CALIFORNIA, 90262," subject to the stated conditions and
requirements and finding the project to be categorically
exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as
amended by Section 15061 b(3).
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Haynes,
Penalber, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Comonissioners Haynes, Kanka, Pryor
ABSTAIN: None
The Commissioners now returned their attention to Item No. 5,
since the applicant was present.
DISK MS:PC041189
7
10. Variance Case No. 1
10992 Pine Avenue (Lawrence R. and Brenda J. Bible)
Applicants request a variance for a five-foot high wrought
iron fence along the front yard setback of their property in
the R-1 zone. Staff recommends denial because a hardship has
not been established and the applicant will not be deprived
of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in ,
the same vicinity if the variance is denied. Case was
continued from the March 14 meeting due to a tie vote and
recommendation of Mr. Douglas Barnes, City of Lynwood
Attorney.
Vice-Chairperson Dove opened the Public Aearing.
Brenda Bible, 10992 Pine Avenue, Lynwood, rose to state the
fence has been up since June 1988. Her home is next to a
bus stop at the intersection of Imperial Highway and Pine
Avenue. She stated her problems stem from children from the
nearby Seventh Day Adventist's School who are waiting for the
bus, as well as other bus riders. Her front yard has been
used a a dump for everything from a dead dog in a plastic bag
to old tires. The children have climbed trees in her front
yard, torn up her flower beds and written on her porch. She
has come home on hot days and found people sitting under the
trees on her front yard because of the cooling shade. She
used to have a 4' fence that could be climbed easily and one
foot higher made all the difference. She stated her neighbor
on the corner of Pendleton has the same height and type of
fence, which is a combination of wrought iron and masonry,
and they were built less than 12 months apart. The presence
of fences give symetrical balance to the block. She stated
she didn't know she needed a permit and the builder never
said anything about it. Her neighbors have complimented her
on the attractive fence. People waiting for the bus
sometines use her fence as a clothes line, but they take
their clothes with them when they leave.
Commissioner Haynes asked if she has filed a complaint with
the RTD about the problem. Mrs. Bible stated that the fence
solved the problem.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis commented that Mrs. Bible doesn't
object to the bus stop, Mrs. Bible understands that the
students need the bus, she just needs the fence as
protection.
There being no one else wishing to speak for or against the
variance, Chairperson Dove closed the Public Aearing.
Commissioner Pryor stated that since the City has laws and
ordinances, they should be followed. He stated that Mrs.
Bible broke the law. He added that his parents have a 3-foot
fence that works just fine.
Commissioner pove stated that changing the bus stop just
moves the problem.
Commissioner Penalber stated he could understand that she
expected the contractor to take care of any needed permits.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis stated her approval of a variance
permitting the fence to stay there. She stated she had never
realized that permits are required for so many things, such
as adding aluminum awnings to one's windows. She stated it
should be considered the responsibility of the City to inform
citizens instead of permitting them to get into situations
like this, just because they don't know about permits.
DISK MS:PC041189
8
Commissioner Willis asked staff why her neighbor was
permitted a 5' fence.
M.r'. 9arfield replied that the fence at 10909 Pine Street was
� built prior to the ban six years ago and grandfathered in.
Maybe her fence was built in the same 12-month period, but
that isn't important, he added. ,
Commissioner pove stated he could understand the apparent
hardship. He suggested that perhaps the Code could be
changed to allow for exceptions like bus stops, and that
fences should be able to be seen through, for oncoming
traffic.
Commissioner Pryor stated that it is already in the Code that
" fences should be able to be seen through.
Mr. Mas stated that solid masonry is allowed to be only 1-
foot hiqh. Past that, he added, you must be able to see
through.
Commissioner pove asked Mrs. Bible what kind of fence her 4-
foot fence had been. She replied that it had been chain
link.
Mr: Mas stated that the motion should follow the pattern in
the RECOMMENDATION that a hardship has/has not been
established and finding that the applicant would/would not be
deprived of privileges enjoyed by her neighbors.
Ms. Jaramillo stated the vote should not be whether or not
she can have the fence, but whether or not a hardship exists.
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, 5ECONDED by Commissioner
Cole-Dennis, finding that a hardship has been established and
that the applicant will be deprived of privileges enjoyed by
the owners of other properties in the same vicinity if the
recommendation of denial is upheld.
MOTION was carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penalber
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner
Cole-Dennis, finding that the applicant will be deprived of
privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the
same vicinity if the recommendation of denial is upheld.
MOTION was denied by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penalber
NOES: None
° ABSENT: Commissioners Aaynes, Pryor, Willis
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Kanka
Commissioner Haynes stated he's trying to work with her, but
is of the opinion that she can contact RTD to have the bus
stop moved, and if the fence is cut down to four feet there
will still be as much protection as she has now.
DISK M5:PC041189
9
� A long discussion ensued between all Commissioners, staff and
applicant with no change in the disposition of the case. She
has to cut down her fence.
Chairperson Dove informed Mrs. Bible that she has fifteen
;;c::r^ �..; 3:: -.r'. `�? the City Council.
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS
There was a presentation by the Lynwood School Board, using a
model of the proposed building. Many aspects of the proposal
were discussed by all Commissioners, staff and members of the
Lynwood School Board.
Staff Comments
Mr. Fenderson presented a status report on the General Plan
update. He said the General Plan study is presently underway,
and there have been meetings with all concerned people and staff.
Staff is now waiting for consultants to submit their findings.
COMMISSION ORALS:
Commissioner Willis questioned staff concerning the possibility
of a new hospital. Mr. Mas stated that Kaiser Permanente has
proposed a 50,000 outpatient facility in the Montgomery Wards
area. He added that nothinq detrimental to the St. Francis
Medical Center will be accepted by the City.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis requested that site maps indicate major
streets near proposed developments. She further stated that
citizens should be informed that permits are required for almost
anything anyone might want to do to improve his property. She
suggested that this information could be included with the water
bill.
Commissioner Penalber stated that such information should be
printed in Spanish as well as English.
Chairperson Dove suggested an insert could be mailed with the
water bill.
Mr. Mas stated the City has a newsletter that is printed
quarterly and such information could be included in it.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis stated her dislike of the quarterly
newsletter and added that sometimes it isn't delivered to her
home. She again stated her desire that information about permits
be included with water bills, since they are delivered to all
homes and businesses.
PUBLIC ORALS:
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION was made to adjourn by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by
Commissioner Haynes, and carried unanimously. The meeting
adjourned at 10:10 p.m.
DISK MS:PC041189
10
APPROVED AS WRITTEN this llth day of April, 1989.
Donald D. Dove, Chairperson
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Aubrey D. Fenderson, Manager pouglas D. Barnes
Planning Division Deputy City Attorney
Disk M5:PC041189
11
�
CUP 2
� DATE: May 9, 1989
' ..... ��i:uIN.T.5::s COMMISSION AGEI�'��. }T rM1��`� ��
. ( . � (t T n � . _.. .
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director l��`iSL i`;.�, __ �l�{' �
Community Development Department "�" �"'
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -CASE NO. 2(CUP 2).
Applicant: Lynwood Unified School District
PROPOSAL
The Lynwood Unified School District is proposing to construct a
two-story Administrative Office Building, approximately 49,000
sq.ft. in size, on the Hosler Junior High School site, located at
11300 Spruce Street in the R-2 zone.
FACTS•
1. Source of Authority
Section 25-12 of the Lynwood Municipal Code regulates the
uses permitted within the Community Facilities zoning
district. The proposed construction requires Conditional
Use Permit approval pursuant to City Ordinance No. 1318,
pertaining to new development in Community Facilities Zones.
2. Property Location
The site is located on the west side of Bullis Road between
Century Boulevard and Platt Avenue.
3. Property Size
The site is irregular in shape comprising approximately ten
(10) acres occupied by various administrative buildings and
classrooms
4. Existing Land Use
The site, presently serving the communities' educational needs
is surrounded by the following land uses:
North - City
South - Residential
East - City
West - City
5. Land Use Description
General Plan Zoning
North - Public Uses North - CF
South - Single-Family South - R-2
East - Public Uses East - CF
West - Public Uses West - CF/R-2
DISK 7:CUP 2
1
r:�.,
6. Project Characteristics
' Th� d=.�%i'v'i+:':��'.3L`ei� Ccii ( 10 ) acre site is occupied by the
Hosler.�Junior High School and the Lynwood Administrative
Services unit. The applicant is proposing to develop a two
story Administrative Office Building, approximately 49,000 •
sq.ft. in size with 56 parking spaces provided at grade and
73 spaces below grade. Approximately 125 employees is
scheduled to occupy the building.
7. Site Plan Review
On March 22, 1989 the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated
the proposed development and recommended approval to the
Planning Commission with specific conditions.
8. Zonincx Enforcement History
None of record.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
1. Consistencv with General Plan
The land use is consistent with the proposed zone change
classification of C-F and with the General Plan designation
of Public Land Uses.
2. Site Suitability
The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
proposed construction, landscaping, driveways and other
development features required by the Zoning Ordinance.
3. Compatibility
The architectural features of the proposed building
aesthetically enhance the existing Civic Center.
4. Compliance with Development Standards
The Conditional Use Permit is regulated by Ordinance No.
1318, an interim zoning ordinance of the City, establishing
a moratorium on public and community facilities.
The moratorium is to insure that development of new public and
community facilities is compatible with surrounding land uses
through the imposition of the Conditional Use Procedure. The
moratorium, also, establishes that development of new public and
community facilities can have permanent negative impacts on
the surrounding neighborhoods should they be permitted through
current outdated regulations (See Attachment).
The development standard at issue is parking. The proposal
is for (1291 parking spaces. A total of (209) parking spaces
is required. The proposed project is deficient by (80)
spaces. However, the applicant proposes to provide the
balance of the required parking by entering into an agreement
acceptable to the City of Lynwood to provide 80 parking
spaces on the proposed site in conjunction with construction
of new classrooms.
5. Conditions of Approval
The improvements as proposed, will not have a negative effect
on the values of the surrounding properties and interfere
with and endanger the public health, safety or welfare.
DISK 7:CUP2
2
:.>,� , . � -
:,. „ � .,.:.. __ ,,. ..
r
6. Benefits to Community
'the proposed deoelopluent wili aid in aesthetically upgrading
the City and will act as a catalyst in fostering other
developments. Furthermore, the development will add
favorably to the City's community facilities base in •
furtherance of the policies of the General Plan.
7. Environmental Assessment
Staff has found that no substantial environmenta2 impact will
result from the proposed development; therefore, a Negative
Declaration has been filed in the Community Development
Department and in the office of the City Clerk.
' RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the
Planning Commission approve CUP 2:
1. Finding that Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 2 carries
out the intent of Ordinance No. 1318.
2. Finding that Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 2, will not
have a siqnificant effect on the environment and certifying
the Negative Declaration as adequate.
3. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2, subject to the stated
conditions and requirements.
Attachments
1. Ordinance 1318
2. Location Map
3. Site Plan
DISK 7:CUP 2
3
d ..y. 1
.. �..; �� _ . . .
�fi I I ��� Yi
{
ORDINANCE NO. 7318
•+ AN r)Rn7NANCR OF THE CITSt D..c+,cr}roc.�THF.
.::.,..,�mr�ir,, AS AN URGE'!CY .
'- .�.�:: -... _.
MORATORIUM ON �OP15T12UC'1'i::c: iN '1'Ht�
pUBLIC AND CONIIdUNITY FACILITIES ZONE,
p,LONG WITH THE INiPOSITION OF vSE
�QpIgEME2iT FOR A CONDITIONAL
p�i�� pENDING COMPLETION OF A
CpNTEMpLATED ZONING ORDINANCE REVISION
� pgpHIgITZNG THE ISSUANCE OF ANY
BUILDIpG pERMITS IN VIOLATION TfiEREOF.
The City Council of the City of Lynwood DOES HEREBY D�AIN
as follows:
SECT� N 1heTabovetwas�introducedbandladoptedtasrdananurgency
1315 concerning 1988 and on that date the Council referred
measure on De�em�eZ 20� velopment Department for further study
the matter to the Community De
and evaluation.
SECT_ I_ ��_, The City Council further finds that pending the
preventlany furtherldevelopmenteunlesslot is donefthroughlaPConditi nal
Use Permit.
SECT_ I�_ The City Council further finds that there is a
current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare
8s a result of allowing development in the Public and Community
Facilities zone under the existing site plan review process and without
a Conditional Use Permit. ort and does
SECTION 4. The City Council has received a reP
15 days to and including November 30, 1989.
hereby exten oratorium established in Ordinance No. 1315 or an
additional 10 months, ordinance
SECT�S• This ordinance is an interim zoning
shall be of no
enacted pursuant to Section 36934 and 65858 of the Government Code o
the State of California, and in accordance therewith,
further force and effect ten (10) months and fifteen (15) days after
the adoption of the ordinan�heuCitySCouncilrshallcextenduthistordinance
65090, and public hearing,
in accordance with the terms and provisions of Section 65858 of t e
Government Code.
SECT_ I_�N 6• The City Council hereby finds, detes fety, and
declares the immediate preservation of the public health,
welfare necessitate the enactment of this ordinance as an urgency
ordinance. Said findings are as follows:
1, The provisions of the Lynwood Municipal Code regulating
public and community facilities are outdated; and
2, City staff is informed that public entitWOOd to
develop such facilities in the City of Lyn
3, Development of new public and community facilities can
have permanent negative im�ittednunder therrcurrent
neighborhoods should they pe
outdated regulations; and
DISK 43: zone
1
__. . , _.____._.,--
-----. __._�..,�..-,.a+.�
4. A total prohibition on new public and comnunity
facilities is not', necessary during the moratorium
imposed by this ordinance, because the potential
, . _ ,.,,. i ;.n.e!� ab�..e .. �.. �... _ � �,.,. _ �.., ,.
u.="�".'� W � _
controlled or mitigated through the conditional use
permit procedure; and
SECT_ I�N S��ILITY- If any section, subsection,
subdivision, sentence, clause, Phr rson or place, is for
or the application thereof to anY Pe
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of
competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to other
persons or places.
The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted
this ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,
clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fachrases,aor
one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, P
portions, or the application thereof to any person or place, be
declared invalid or unconstitutional.
re ular meeting of the City Council
First reat at a g
of said City held on the
17th day of January • 1989
and finally adopted and ordered published at a
n„lar -
meeting of said Council held on the
17th day of
January , 1989, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCZLMF.NIBERS HEINE� HENNING� MORRIS� RICHARDS� WELLS
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN:
PASSED, APPROVED AND 1�DCIPTED THIS 1�hday of January, 1989
EVELyN M, WELLS, Mayor of
the City of Lynwood, California
ATTEST :
��� � �-�-��
ANDREA L. HOOPER, C1ty Cl�k of
the City of Lynwood. California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
�.
- H g, gpgBOSA, City Attorney
Charles c3. Gomez, City nager
- DISK 43: MORA
Z
-`-�-------
^—��wa�..� .. x�
STATE OF CALIFORNIA � ss.
COIJIVTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, zhe undersigned, City Clerk of the City of
Lynwood. and ex-o£ficio clerk of the Council of said City,
do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy
of Ordinance No. �3�s adopted by the City Council of the
�City of Lynwood, and that the same was passed on the date '
and by the vote therein stated. �
17th da Of January � 19 89
DATED this Y .
� . ��h�
ity er � .
. City of Lynwood .
.
i' ' _.
� �
�� .�
�
� LOGATI4N iVIAP
,�
. . -- -
� a �"� � �� e ��° CENTURY BOUL£VARD
ti h Q�
� e. ��,
�: \ Cin� in � f�, ,�p. ��;xo. . •
.,..o � y .m so
/ o I Ie izi
ar EI I^ ar i F
� 'O ilaw �is� S �tsor iwm uco� m //1� //L //S //I //J
ARLI /
TE
� bV9 30 -
.
Q p.� �� � �
� y ue � ua� izo izi iz:
� v �
;
<
992 30
_ '
N
�
� G\ � �
_ - � - �,;
_ _ - y
- - J L
----- - - j n�
m °
- _ — G'�
----- -- ,�Rp
PIRK/NG IRCA --
� �
i � e0
so� i a �� ri ° so " q`• Jo � IIMoI G5 li�o?, . . .
. �o�,� ,00 , o .-� . .-; � ,o- �. . ; � � 1 i � i o
S �,voo � I � ^ s s s
� ' - I i il'� S �{yo r�
� � „(�s� iiss �ii1s .�ii�s �r9 � 9 � W. ubz y u�i ' o lii s iie4e � i� � ireci iars i , �� �
1a 1 \ � E I i �1 P • I ^ � � � � ^f �n q � � . .o `-�
:. s � : " � �.°. . � s a � m Q � s �' o � � h M � � � ^ �,^� n' p e� e
,'�rv� r Ci � M r� ro .h r� M 1� �1�-ibe h� n M 'n p . y M ( 'pi
ia
• � � � V PLATr AVENUE Y � � � m �
�i o p ie a� ,�.' �� � j ro ro ��o so .y � .�i .,p � sR9 ii� � � �
� J ?�4�� v �.o $� „°, w 'T � � ^ r ' ` E 8 n � � n / t'' J I� J �
� J I
i I a •� � �SI �. a I� I� 4 � � s I`9 ^° � i i � i" �y� n� F�I ro �y c< � o
��`t M b o N� h� �/Z/! �/IY1 / i / 7 /IM /I/! w .10
{ ' 7 /IOC /S¢9 /7/Q /3// � � / /Z ,
i
I I g /Sis � � t � \\ n .
�I i � i 11431" � � I Z � � R . ( 8 r'�
,�c 1 � c� � ,�-
.;
RRcOr,UTTnx Nn ��s�
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE '
PERMIT (CUP) NO. 2 TO CONSTRUCT A TWO-STORY
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE BUILDZNG IN THE CF
(COMMUNZTY FACILITIES) ZONE, 11300 SPRUCE
STREET, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262.
WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law,
conducted a public hearing on subject application for a
Conditional Use Permit; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission carefully considered all
pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for development
in the CF (Cotmnunity Facilities) 2one.
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines as follows:
A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape
to accommodate the structures, parking, walls,
landscaping, driveways and other development features
required by the Zoning Ordinance.
B. The granting of the proposed Conditional Use Permit will
not adversely affect the Lynwood General Plan, and carries
out the intent of Ordinance No. 1318.
C. The structures as proposed, or modified, subject to
conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values
of the surrounding properties or interfere with or
endanger the public health, safety or welfare.
D. The site will be developed pursuant to the current zoning
regulations and site plan submitted and reviewed by the
Site Plan Review Committee.
E. The proposed development will aid in aesthetically
upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in fostering
other quality developments.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby
approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. CUP 2 provided the
following conditions are observed and complied with at all times.
DISK 48:RE502256
� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
General
1. The proposed develogment shall comply with all applicable
regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform
Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code.
2. Any proposed subseguent modification of the subject site or
structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community
Development Department, Planning Division, for review.
3. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement
of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and
� agrees to the conditions stated herein before any building
permits are issued.
PLANNING DIVISION
4. This permit shall become void one hundred twenty (120) days,
unless extended, after the use permitted has been abandoned
or has ceased to be actively exercised.
5. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood
main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving
the proposed development.
6. The side yard adjoining the residential zone shall not be
less than twenty (20') feet.
7. Open storage of materials, products and equipment shall be
completely concealed from view of vehicular and pedestrian
traffic by an architectural barrier approved by the
Community Development Director or his/her designee.
a. Site landscaping plans shall be approved by the
Community Dvelopment Department prior to installation.
Said plans shall be prepared by a licensed landscape
architect.
8. Automobile Parking stall, standard car.
a. Dimensions. The minimum dimensions of each standard car
shall be not less than 9 feet in width by 18 feet in
length.
9. Automobile Parking Stall for the Aandicapped.
a. Automobile parking stalls for the handicapped shall be
provided in accordance with Section 25-14 of the Lynwood
Zoning Ordinance.
10. Parking lot landscaping. All parking areas containing five
(5) or more automobile parking spaces shall be landscaped
� and permanently maintained with suitable nursery stock, as
follows:
a. Planting area. All planter areas shall be enclosed
within a 6" high by 6" wide concrete curb, where the
same is not adjacent to a concrete sidewalk, masonry
wall or building. Plantinq areas which are provided as
wheelstops, shall be a sufficient width to accommodate
overhang of parking vehicles.
DISK 7:LYUSDCUP
1
b. Types of landscaping shall consist of combinations of
trees, shrubs, and ground cover with special
� consideration given to their eventual size, spread,
susceptibility to disease and pests, durabil_ity,- 3n�.
adaptability to existing soil and climatic conditions.
c. Where landscaping is required or provided within or
along a parking area, an adequate automatic irrigation
system shall be provided. All such irrigation systems
shall be permanently maintained.
11. A total of (209) parking spaces shall be provided. The �
developer shall enter into and execute an agreement acceptable
to the City of Lynwood for the balance,(80 parkinq spaces) of
the required parking spaces for the proposed administrative
office facility and existing administrative offices on the
Aosler Junior High School site.
12. No building shall have a height greater than seventy-five
(75') feet.
13. The lighting shall be stationary and be deflected away from
adjacent properties.
14. The main entrance to the building shall provide for
independent access to the physically impaired.
15. The address of the building shall be displayed in a manner
acceptable to the Community Development Director or his/her
designee.
16. Proper consideration shall be given to the relationship
between the existing and finished grades of the site to be
improved and adjacent properties.
17. Mechanical equipment and utilities shall be architecturally
screened from view. Roof-top mechanical equipment and
appurtenances to be used in the operation or maintenance of
the building shall be arranged so as not to be visible from
any point at or below the roof level of the building.
18. Trash areas shall be enclosed by a five-foot high decorative
masonry wall with solid gates.
19. Prior to the installation, display, enlarging, modfying,
relocating or changing of signs, a permit must be obtained
from the Department of Community Development, Planning
Division.
20. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally
compatible with the desiqn of the subject and adjacent
buildings. In addition, no security fences, qrills, etc.
shall be installed without the prior written approval of the
Director of Community Development and required building
permits.
21. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment,
swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical
devices shall be located within the rear yard or street side
yard of a corner lot. Such equipment shall be screened from
surrounding properties and streets and so operated that they
do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring
residents, in accordance with the City's Noise ordinance.
All means of access to the referenced equipment shall be
desiqned and installed so as to prevent access to
unauthorized persons and shall be approved by the Building
and Safety Division.
DISK 7:LYUSDCUP
2
PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING
22. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered
� Civil Engineer.
23. Construct full width/occ sidewalk in parkway from Platt Ave.
to existing sidewalk North of property on Bullis Road.
24. Construct six (6) wheelchair ramp (s) on all sides of alley
type drive approaches.
25. Reconstruct damaged pavement along Bullis Road from Platt
Avenue to north of property on Bullis Road.
26. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected
separately. Construct laterals as necessary.
27. Install fifteen (15) 24" box street trees per City of
Lynwood standards along Bullis Road.
28. Construct tree well covers per City of Lynwood standards for
existing and proposed street trees.
29. Provide and install four (4) marbelite street pole with
light fixture, underground services and conduits along
Bullis Road.
30. Underground all utilities.
31. Underground existing utilities if any modifications are
proposed for the electrical service panel.
32. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all
off-site improvements.
33. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire
protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The
work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by
the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the
Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any
work.
34. Applicant needs to hire water Engineering firm acceptable to
Engineering Department to determine if the line should be
abandoned or relocated. This will require modelinq of the
system and other system improvements. If the line needs to
be relocated new easements, plans and improvements are
needed. Developer shall pay all required permit fees.
` Improving the system may require improving fire hydrants.
35. Correct ponding on east and west sides of Bullis Road from
northernly property line to Platt Avenue. Work may include
reconstruction or gutter and/or catch basins.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
36. Provide hydraulicaly designed sprinkler system:
a. Ordinary hazard group I in basement parking area with 1
1/2" hose stations.
b. Light hazard in other areas.
c. PIV to be located away from building.
d. F.D.C. to be located near the street approximately 20'
feet from curb line (reached with one 50' hose from
trench. May be in landscaped area.
DISK 7:LYUSDCUP
' 3
.
� e. Provide floor control valves.
�. ?rovicie s�ipervised alarm system.
37. Provide Knox Box for key to building.
38. Provide required extinguishers. �
Section 3. Staff has found that no substantial environmental
impact will result from the proposed development; therefore, a
Negative Declaration has been prepared and is on file in the
Community Development Department and the Office of the City Clerk.
Section 4. A copy of this Resolution shall be delivered to
the applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of May, 1989, by members of
the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Donald A. Dove, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes
Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney
DISK 7:LYiJSDCUP
4
i
a
• i Q�' °'^,�
��� ' f l �� 4'� f��'�
Cf; S� i^�►� p
DATE: May 9, 1989
� �u -�
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
�ROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Depaxtment
�
SUBJECT: Variance Case No. 2
Applicant: (Ceneda Reyes)
Proposal•
The applicant is requesting approval of a parking Variance at
10978 San Vicente Avenue in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential)
zone.
Facts
The applicant is requesting a parking variance that would allow
her to provide only three one car garages for three legal non-
conforming dwelling units rather than the required six parking
spaces. In addition she proposes to enclose an existing porch,
remodel the living room, kitchen and bath in the front single
fmaily home.
Staff recommended approval of the parking variance only but the
applicants consultant requested a continuation of the case for
further discussion with staff on the issue of remodelling the
front home. Staff made various attempts to reach the consultant
but has not been able to contact her.
This item was continued from the Planning Commission's regularly
scheduled meeting of April 11, 1989.
Recommendation
Since the applicant's consultant has not shown up for discussions
� regarding the remodelling of the front house, Staff respectfully
request that this item be continued to the Planning Commission's
regularly scheduled meeting of June 13, 1989.
DISK 48:VAR#z
�:,
i n � DATE : May 9, 19 8 9 I1U C�C Q r� �� L��'i ���'�.1. .�.�.._._-.�_..-�.+^.�?!
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION CAJE I'�'J. _ ��l �.....��
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Coinmunity Development Department
SUBJECT: Zonina Ordinance Amendment Case No. 2 Regulating
Property Maintenance City-Wide
PROPOSAL:
Staff is proposing to amend Chapter 25, the Official Zoning and
Sign Ordinance of the City of Lynwood with respect to Nuisance
and Property Maintenance.
FACTS
It has"become a matter of great concern regarding the neglect and
disrepair of the housing stock and property located within the
City. Provisions in the Municipal Code do not adequately address
these issues.
At the moment, Articles II and III of the City's Nuisance
Abatement and Property Maintenance overlap to a great extent and
should not only be combined but should also deal with specific
issues.
This item is continued from the Planning Commission's regularly
scheduled meeting of April 11, 1989.
RECOMMENDATIONS ,
In view of the complexity of this issue and the short time the
Commissioners are given to review this matter, staff recommends
that we continue the item to allow the Commission to review and
consider the proposed ordinance (attached) at its next meeting
DISK 47:88100ZOA
1
_� �.
ORDINANCE NO.
,
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCZL OF TfiE CITY OF
LYNWOOD� CALIFORNIA� AMENDING CHAPTER 21 OF Tf�
LYNWOOD ?NNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PIIBLIC
H[TISANCSS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALZFORNIA DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTIOP 1: Article I and Article II oP Chapter 21, of the
Lynwood Municipal Code are hereby repealed.
SECTION 2: Article I is hereby added to Chapter 21, of the
Lynwood Municipal Code, as follows:
ARTICLE I
N[TISANCES
Sec. 21-1. Purpose and Intent.
The purpose of this article is to provide for the abatement
of hazardous, unsanitary or unsightly'conditions which affect the
' life, limb, health, property, safety and welfare of the general
public in such a way as to constitute a nuisance, and is based upon
. the following findinqs:
(a) The City has a history and reputation for well kept
properties and the property values and the general
welfare of this community are founded, in part, upon -
the appearance and maintenance of property.
(b) There now appears a need for further emphasis on the
, maintenance of a number of premises because conditions
hereafter described have been found from place to place
throughout the city.
(c) The existence of these conditions is injurious and
inimical to the public health, safety and welfare of
residents of this city and contributes substantially
and increasing to the necessity for expenditures for
protection against hazards and diminution of property
values, prevention of crime and the preservation of
public health, safety and welfare and maintenance of
police, fire and accident protection. These problems
are becoming increasingly direct and substantial in
significance and effect and the uses and abuses of
property reasonably relate to the proper exercise of
the police power in the protection of health, safety
and welfare of public.
(dj Unless corrective measures are undertaken to alleviate
these existing conditions and particularly to avoid
future prbhlems in this regard, the public health,
safety and qeneral welfare as specifically the property
values and social and economic standards of the
community will be depreciated. The abatement of these
conditions will enhance the appearance and value of
such properties rather than be a burden on the owners,
and the abatement of such conditions will also
RJM-957.0
appreciate the values and appearance of neighboring
properties and benefit use and enjoymerrt of properties
in the general area and will improve the general
` welfare a;�d image oP th� cit1.
Sec. 21-2. Declaration of What Constitutes a Public
Nuisance. �
For purposes of this article, the term "public nuisance"
shall mean any of the �ollowing conditions or acts:
(a) Any public nuisance known nt common lam or in equity
jurieprudence.
(b) Any attractive nnisance which may prove detrimental to
children, whether in a buildin�� on tlae premises of the
buildi� ar upon an unaccypied lot, t�is includes any
abandoned xell, shafts, basements or excavation;
abandoned refrigerator and motor vehicles; any
structurally unsDUnd fences or structures; and/or.any
Iumber, trash, garbage, rubbish, refuse, fences, debris
or vegetation which may prove a hazard for inquisitive
minors.
(c) Whatever is dangerous to human liPe or is detrimental
to health as determinerl by the health:v�ficer.
(d) Overcrowdir�q a room with nccupants.
(e) Insufficient ventilation or illuminatiso¢�.
(f) Inadequate or unsanitary sewage or pl�ing
facilities.
(g) Oncleanliness as determined by the hea3�h officer.
(h) Whatever renders air, Yood or drink onwholesome or
detrimental to the i�ealth of human beings as
determined by the health officer.
(i) Any condition or nse of premises or of building
exteriors which is detrimental to the property of
others. This include, but is not limited to the
keeping ar the depositing on or the scattering over the
premises of anp of the fallowing:
(1) Lumber, junk, trash or debris (except in the
case af lumber or junk, where the storing of
• such material is specifically permitted by
the zoninq regulations applicable to the
premises and vhere the material is being
stored in such a fashion as to not constitute
a nuisance as that term is otherwise defined
in the sectian�;
(2) A service station that is not currently being
operated as such and the condition of which
(i) presents a health hazard or (ii) presents
a safety hazard;
(3) Abandoned, disaarded or unused objects or
• equipment such as automobiles, furniture,
stoves, refrigerators, f'reezers, cans or.
containers;
(4) .Any device, decaration, design, fence,
structure, clothesline or vegetation which is
unsightly by reason of fts condition.
FtJM-957 .0 2
�
�j) �ire hazards: Dry or dead scrub, dead trees,
� comliustible refuse and waste or any material growing on
8 �k.r�Pt., stdewalk or upon private propertA by
reason oP its size, manner of growth �nd
constitutes a fire hazard to a building, imprv�e�a�,«,
crop or other proparty, or when dry will, in reasonable
probability, constitute a fire hazard.
(k) po��uted water: A swimming pool, excavation, pond or
other body of water which is abandoned, unattended,
unfiltered, or not otherwise maintained, resulting in
the vater becoming polluted. Polluted water means
water contained in a swimming pool, excavation, pond or
other body of water. which includes but is not limited
to bacterial growth, including algae, remaine of
3nsects, remains of deceased animals, reptiles,
rabbish, refuse, debris, papers and any other foreign
matter or material which because of its nature or
location constitutes an unhealthy, or unsafe or
unsiqhtly condition. �
- �1j ��ic burninq: The intentional outdoor burning of any
material, structure, matter or thing unless
specifically authorized.
�m� Refuse and waste: Refuse and waste matter which by
reason of its location and character is unsightly and
interferes with the reasonable enjoyment of property by
neighbors, detrimentally affects property values in the
surrounding neighborhood or community, or which would
materially hamper or interfere with the prevention or
suppression of fire upon the premises. Refuse and
waste means unused or discarded matter and material
having no substantial market value, and which consists
of such matter and materials as: rubbish, refuse,
debris and matter of any kind including but not
limited to rubble, asphalt, concrete, plaster, title,
rocks, bricks, soil, building materials, crates,
cartons, containers, boxes, machinery or parts thereof,
scrap metal and other pieces of inetal, ferrous or
trimmingssfromrplants�and treesiVCanshibottlesdandrts,
barrels.
j �n� y codes: The violation of a provision of the
� following uniform codes as they have been adopted by
this city:
(1) the Uniform Building Code;
(2) the National Electrical Code;
(3) the Uniform Fire Code;
(4) the Uniform Housing Code;
(5) the Uniform Plumbinq Code.
� ���s�� �r�inance: The violation of a provision of the
land use regulations o! the city is set forth in
chapter 25 of this code, as amended.
(p) gse of orivate vrovertv bv vehicle: The use of private
property by any form of motorized or motor driven bike,
scooter or vehicle.
� vain enance of nrover�vs The existence of any of the
falloving conditions:
RJM-957.0 3
• (1) Buildings which are abandoned, boarded up,
` partially destroyed or left unreasonably in a
� R�R�e of partial construction;
(2) IInpainted buildings causing dry rot, warping and
tercaite inEestation;
(3j Broken windows constituting hazardous conditions �
and inviting trespassers and malicious mischief;
(q) Overqrowth ve g e o tat �� iOn o r a p ro perty t values; to
neighborin9 P Pe Y
(5) Dead trees, weeds and debris: (i) constituting
unsightly appearance, (ii) dangerous to public
safety and welfare, °values� detrimental to nearby
property or property
(6) Trailers, campers, boats and other mobile
equipment stored for unreasonable periods fn.front
yard areas and causing depreciation of nearby
property values;
��� unreas nablerperiodsn n the�pre ises
depreciation of nearby property values;
(8) Attractive nuisances dangerous to children in�ii)
porm of: (i) abandoned and broken equipment,
hazardous pools, ponds and excavations and (iii)
neglected machinery.
�g) Broken or discaTaearearforuunreasonablehperiods;
equipment in y
- (10) Clotheslines in front yard areas;
(il) visible from public streetstand rightsaofswaya
�lZ� visible fromspublictstreetsrforsunreasonableds and
periods;
(13) Neglect of premises to sp�=t�oncause�detrimental
influence zone changes, values;
effect upon property or property
(14) Maintenance of premises in such condition as to be
detrimental to the public health, safety or
general welfare or in such manner as to constitute
a public nuisance as defined by Civil Code Section
3480.
(15) Property including but not limited to building
exteriors which are maintained in such cond��tinn
as to become so defective, and unsightly,
snch condition of deterioration or disrepaiTO ert
the same causes depreci=olerty or Y
values of surrounding p p
detrimental to proximal properties and
improvements. This includes but is not limited to
the keeping and disposing of or the scattering
over the property or premises of any of the
following: (i) lumber, jnnk, trash or debris; (ii)
abandoned or d3scarded or unused objects of
", equipment such as automobiles, furniture, stoves,
4
ILTM-957 .0
.. �. � ���t�
retriqerators, freezers, cana or containers; (iii)
stagnant water or excavations; or (iv) any device,
�` ,;_ .��� �!�,�±.�n, fence, etructura, clothesline
or vegetation which is unsightiy by reason of its
condition or inapproprfate location;
(16) Maintenance of premises so out of harmony or �
conformity with the maintenance standards of
adjacent properties ss to cause substantial
diminution of the enjoyment, use, or property
values of such adjacent property;
�� (17) property maintained (in relation to others) so as
to eatablish a prevalence of depreciated values,
impaired investments and social and economic
maladjustments to such an extent that the capacity
to pay taxes is reduced and tiax receipts from such
particular area are inadequate for the cost of
public services rendered therein.
Sec. 21-3. Declaration of Public Nuisance.
All property maintained in violation of Section 21-2 is
hereby declared to be a public nuisance and shall be nbated by
rehabilitation, demolition, removal or repair pursuant to the
procedures set forth herein. The procedures for abatement set forth
herein shall not be exclusive and shall not in any manner limit or
restrict the City from enforcinq other City ordinances or abating
public nuisances in any other manner provided by law.
Sec. 21-4. Notification oE Nuisance.
Whenever the City Manager finds that any premises in the
City are being maintained contrary to one or more provisions of
Section 21-2, he shall give written notice to the owner of the
property setting forth a brief description of the condition(s)
constituting a public nuisance and the sections being violated. The
notice shall set forth a reasonable time limit foz correcting the
violation(s) and may also set forth sugqested methods of abatement.
The notice sha1T be served upon the owner ir► the manner provided for
in Section 21-6. As used in this Chapter, unless otherwise
indicated, the term "owner" shall mean any person owning, leasing,
occupying or having charge or possession of the affected real
property.
� Sec. 21-5. Hearing before City Council.
In the event the owner of the property Pails, neglects or
refuses to comply with the notice mentioned in the preceding section,
' the City Council shall conduct a hearing to determine whether the
condition oP the property constitutes a public nuisance, the
abatement of which is appropriate under the police power of the
City. The notice shall be served upon the owner in the manner
provided for in Section 21-6.
Sec. 21-6. tianner of Givinq Notice.
A. Service of all notices under this chapter shall be upon
the person owning the premises as such person's name and address
appears on the last equalized assessment roll, and upon any person in
charge or possession of the premises, either by personal delivery or
by depositing a copy of the notice, enclosed in a sealed envelope
with the postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States postal
servfce. If there ia no such address, the notice may be mailed to
the owner in care of the property address.. Service by mail is
complete at the time of deposit in IInited States Postal Service.
Failure of any peraon to receive such notice ahall not affect the
validity of any prxeedings hereunder.
RJM-957.0 5
.. . . tiF ' .. �
� 8.. Notice of the hearing before the City Council ahall be
served upon tha property owner not less than ten (10) days before the
timo„ ft,r�,a Fpr the lhaar.i!+?� unt.±,nR ��P k.hP hearing shall be
„ ;+��a�. ��iai�y �.. ::na iolLowing Ynrmat:
. � "NOTICE OF HEARING TO ABATE NUISANCE" `
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on the day of
• , 19_, at the�hour of 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter
as the matter may be heard, the City Council of the City of Lynwood
will conduct a public hearing to determine whether the real property
located nt (Street address), Lynwood,
California, more particularly described as:
(Lega1 Description)
constitutes a.public nuisance subject to abatement by the rehabili-
tation of the property, removal of trash or debris, or by the repair
or demolition of buildings or structures situated thereon.
The alleged conditions constituting a public nuisance are
the following:
(Describe conditions)
If the property, in whole or in part, is found to be a '
public nuisance, and if the public nuisance is not properly abated by
the owner or person in charge thereof as directed by the City
Council, then it shall be abated by the City, in which case the cosfs
incurred by the City will be assessed upon the property and shall
become a lien against the property until paid.
All persons having any objection to, or interest in, this
matter may appear at the hearing, at which testimony and other
evidence will be taken and given due consideration.
DATED this day of , 19_.
CITY OF Lynwood
City Manager (or Designee)
.. C. The City Manager, in his discretion, may combine the
notices required by Sections 21-3 and 21-4 into one notice, or he
may qive both such notices at the same time.
D. Where the City Manager determines that the condition of
the property presents an imminent peril to life or adjacent property,
he may dispense with the notice required by Section 21-3 and give
notice of a hearing before the City Council pursuant to Section 21-4,
in which case the hearing may be scheduled not less than five (5)
days from the date oY the notice. Notice of a hearinq under this
subsection shall be given by personal delivery to the owner, by mail
through an establfshed overnight mail delivery service, by telegram,
by telephone, or by such other means as is reasonably calculated to
immediately advise the owner of the hearing. The notice shall state
the grounds upon which the provisions of this subsection are invoked.
RJM-957.0 6
. � °
� j �
Sec. 21-7. Hearing By City Council.`
f
_ At the time stated in the notice of hearing, the City
'. .:_ :._u V��1�Jj4L'L ��i 'reie�u�i.,, _�sue�;c�, i:��luding, but
not limited to, testimony from ownera, City personnel, witnesses and
other intereated parties, and may consider etaff reports and other
written evidence relative to the matter. The hearing may be �
continued Prom time to time. Upon the conclusion of the hearing, the
City Council shall, based upon the evidence presented, determine
whether the property, or any part thereof, constitutes a public
nuisance within the meaninq of Section 21-2. If the City Council
finds that the property constitutes a public nuisanca, it.shall order
the public nuisance gbated vithin a reasonable time. The City
Council's decision shall be by Resolution, which shall contain
findings upon which its determination is based. The Resolution shall
contain a description of the method of abatement necessary to comply
with the order and etate that.i! the public nuisance is not abated
within the time permitted by the City Council, the City Manager shall
be authorized to enter upon the premises for the purpose of abating
the same.
Sec. 21-8. Service on Owner of Resolution Orderinq
Abatement.
A copy of the Resolution ordering the abatement of the
public nuisance shall be served upon the owner or other persons
having an interest in the affected premises, in accordance with trie
provisions of section 21-6. '
� Sec. 21-10. Abatement by Owner.
The property owner shall have the right to have the nuisance
abated at his own e�ense, provided the such abatement is commenced
� prior to the expiration of the period of time set forth in the City
Council's Resolution and thereafter diligently and continuously
prosecuted to completion. The time set for abatement,.upon good cause
shown, may be extended by the City Council.
Sec. 21-11. Abatement by City Manager.
If the public nuisance is not completely abated in the
manner and within the time set forth in the City Council's
�Resolution, then the City Manager may cause the same to be abated by
City forces or private contractor, and entry upon the property for
such purpose is hereby expressly authorized.
Sec. 21-12 Record of cost of abatement.
The City Manager shall keep an accounting of the cost,
including incidental expenses, of abatement oP the public nuisance
for each separate lot or parcel oP land where the work has been done,
and shall render an itemized report in writ3ng to the City Council
showing the cost of abatement, including salvaqe value, if
applicable; provided that before the report is submitted to the City
Council for approval, a copy of the same shall be posted for at least
five days npon the premises of property upon which said buildings or
structures were situated, toqether with a notice oP the time when
said xeport shall be submitted to the City Council !or confirmation.
A copy of said report and notice shall be served upon the owner of
the property in accordance with the provisions of section 21-6, at
least five days prior to submitting the same to tha City Council.
Proof oP such posting and service shall be made by afPidavit and
filed with the City Clerk. The term "incidental expenses" ehall
include, but not be limited to, the actual expenses and costs of the
� City in the preparation of notices, speciPications and contracts,
inspectinq the work, and the costs of printinq and mailings required
under this Chapter.
RJM-957.0 �
'. .
Sec. 21-13. Report-Hearinq and proceedinqs. �
'� At tha t�,... ._�t . �.. ,, , . - �_ ;:' ,..� ':`i�y �a3 , a.� a'��'i;�g
,,..a it;y,�l�� ....,. ;.i� w�....,ii�a..dil�hEd'f and pass upon the�evidence
aubmitted by the City Manager, together with any objections or
protests raised by any of the persons liable to the assessed for the �
cost abatinq the nuisance. Thereupon the City Council may make such
revision, correction or_modiPication ta tha report as it may deem
just, after which, the report as it is submitted, or as revised,
corrected or modified, shall be confirmed. The hearing may be
continued from time to time.
Sec.21-14. Assessment oP cost lien against the property.
, The confirmed cost of abatement of a nuisance upon any lot
or parcel of land shall constitute a special assessment against the
respective lot or parcel of land to which it relates, and upon
recordatfon in the office of the County Recorder of a Notice of Lien,
it shall constitute a lien--on the property in the amount of the
assessment. After the confirmation of said report, a copy thereof
may be transmitted to the assessor and tax collector for the City,
whereupon it shall be the duty of said assessor and tax collector to
add the amount of such assessment, or assessments, to the next
regular bills oP taxes levied against said respective lots and
parcels of land for municipal purposes, and thereafter said amounts
shal� be collected at the same time and in the same manner as
ordi�ary municipal taxes are collected, and shall be subjeat to the
same, penalty 8nd the same procedure under foreclosure and sale in
cas�: of delinquency in the manner and means provided by law. The
Notice of Lien for recordation shall be in form substantially as
follows:
NOTICE OF LIEN
(Claim of the City of Lynwood)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to the authority vested
by the provisions of Chapter 21 of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the
City Manager of the City of Lynwood did on or about the day
of , 19_, cause certain work to be performed upon the
property hereinaEter described for the purpose of abating a public
nuisance on said property; that the City Council of the City of
Lynwood did on the day of , 19_, confirm and
assess the cost of such abatement; that neither the cost of such
abatement, nor any part thereof, has been paid to the City; that the
City of Lynwood does hereby claim a lien for the cost of such
abatement in the amount of the assessment, to wit: the sum of $
; and that the same shall be a lien upon said real property
until it has been paid in full and discharged of record.
The real property upon which a lien ie claimed is that
certain parcel of land located in the City of Lynwood, County of Los
Angeles, State of California, particularly described as follows:
(Legal Description)
DATED this day of , 19_.
CITY OF LYNWOOD
City Manager
RJM-957.0 8
�
Sec. 21-15. Delegation of City Manager's Responsibilities.
..,
The City Manager may delegate the responsibilities imposed
. ,. ,
-�--- �.-_ �-�-, � �.__... �,. :::�.,��s ��° empl�yees as .
, .. . _� _ . • -�
he, in his discretion, deems appropriate.
Sec. 21-16. Exceptions for enclosed vehicles.
This article shall not apgly to a vehicle or part thereof
which is completely enclosed within a building or yard in a lawful
manner where it 3s not visible from the street or other public or
private property.
Secs. 21-17 through 21-19, reserved.
Section 2: Article II is hereby added to Chapter 21 of the.
Lynwood Municipal Code as follows:
ARTZCLB II
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
Sec. 21-20. Purpose.
The purpose oP this Article 'is to provide an alternative
procedure to compel the removal of grafffti from buildings and other
structures. The City Council finds and determines that the presence
of graffiti on buildings and other structures when visible from
streets, alleys, right-of-ways and other places open and accessible
to the public constitutes a public nuisance.
Sec. 21-21. Authority of City Xanager to cause abatement
and removal.
� Upon discovering the existence of graffiti on any building
or other structure, where such graffiti is visible from any street,
alley, rightrof-way or other place open and accessible to the public,
. the City Manager shall have the authority to cause abatement and °
removal of thereof in accordance with the procedures prescribed in
, this Article.
Sec. 21-22. Notice of Intention to Abate and Remove --
Contents.
� A ten-day notice of intention to abate and remova graffiti
as a public nuisance ehall be mailed by certified or registered mail
to the persons specified in section 21-6. The notice of intention
shall be substantially the followinq form:
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ABATE AND .
REMOVE GRAFFITI AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE
� (Name and Address of Owner/Occupant oP Property)
As owner shown on the last equalized assessment roll of the
property"located at , Lynwood, California, or
- as a person in charge of or possession of said property, you are
- hereby notffied that the undersigned pursuant to Section 21-21 of the
Lynwood Municipal Code has determined that there exists upon said
property qraffiti that is visible from a public street, alley, right-
of-way or other place open and accessible to the public, which
constitutes a public nuisance.
YOU ARE AEREBY NOTIFIED to abate the nuisance by the
removal of the gralfiti vithin ten days Prom the date of mailing of
this notice and upon your Pailure to do so the same will be abated .
RJM-957.0 9
} and removed by the City oP Lynwood and the cost thereof, together
with administrative coets, assessed to you as owner of the property
"' on which the graffiti ie located.
YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that you may, within ten days after
the mailing oP this notice of intention, request a public hearing
before the City Council oP the City of Lynwood and if such request is .
not received by the City Clerk within such ten-day period, the City
Manager shall riave the suthority to abate and remove the graffiti as
a public nuisance and assess the costs as aforesaid without a public
hearing. You may appear in persan at any hearing requested by you or
the occupant of the property or in lieu thereof aay present a sworn
staf.ement as aforesaid in time for consideration at such hearing.
Date oP Mailinq: CITY OF LYNWOOD
, By.
City Manaqer
(or Designee)
Sec. 21-23. Conduct of Hearings.
IIpon request by the owner or occupant of the property
received by the city clerk within ten days after the mailing of the
notice specified in Section 21-22, a hearing shall be held by the
.. city council on the question of the abatement and removal of the
qraffiti in the manner specified in Section 21-17. If such a
request for hearing is not received within the ten day period, the
city manager shall have the authority to enter upon the property to
abate and remove the graffiti as a public nuisance without holding a
hearing.
Sec. 21-24. Assessment of Administrative Costs �nd Costs of
Removal.
Administrative costs and the costs of zemoval incurred by �
the city may be assessed as a lien against the property following a
hearing held pursuant to sections 21-12 throuqh 21-14.
SECTION 3: Article IV of the Lynwood Municipal Code,
commencing with Section 21-50 is hereby redesignated Article iII.
SECTION 4: The city clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption oP th3s ordinance and cause the same to be published in the
manner prescribed by law.
INTRODUCED this day of , 1988.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
• , 1988.
PAUL H. RICHARDS, II, Mayor
City of Lynwood
ATTEST:
ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk
C3ty of Lynwood
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
City Atto;ney VICENTE L. MAS, Director
Community Development
Department
RJM-957.0 10
i
I
�z , . AG � �,, ; , :. � ; ." �� N 0. _._.�..---
{� � DATE: May 9, 1989 ' , ",' � - �1 1 P ��
� _., � CAS� ��4��. __ �.�
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Depari:i�,�_�'.
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit- Case No. 9
' Applicant: Joseph Chang '
Pro osal:
The applicant is requesting approval of a�Conditional Use Permit
in order to build a two-story, five unit apartment building at
11215 Louise Avenue in the.R-3 zone.
Facts•
� 1. Source of Authority
Section 25-4.5 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a `
Conditional Use Permit be obtain�d for any residential
development in the R-3 zone.
2. Property Location
The subject property is an interior lot on the west side of Louise
Avenue between Beechwood Avenue and Sanborn Avenue. (Refer to �
attached Location Map). It is rectangular in shape (50'x264') and
measures approximately 13,200 square feet in size.
3. Existina Land Use
The lot is improved with a single family dwelling unit and
the following surrounding land uses:
North- School East- Single Family/Mu1ti
South- Single Family West- Single Family/Multi
4. Land Use Description
The General Plan designation for the subject.site is Multi-Family
Residential, and the Zoning Classification is High Density
Residential (R-3). The surrounding land uses are as follows:
General Plan: Zoning:
North-Multi Residential North- R-3
South-Multi Residential South-R-3-
East- Multi-Family Residential , East- R-3
, West- Multi-Family Residential ' West- R-3
r�
5. Proiect Characteristics
The project is for development of.a two story, five"(5) unit
apartment dwelling. Each unit will comprise of three (3) bedrooms,
two baths, living room, a dining area and kitchen.
' For each new unit, an attached two car garage will be provided.
Approximately 34.7 percent of the site will be landscaped.
Approximately 11 percent will be allocated for useable open space.
A trash enclosure will be located approximately 103 feet from the
front yard perimeter. ;
All areas of the site not covered by buildings, ancilliary
facilities and driveway have been devoted to landscaping or open
space.
DISK 47:CUP9
1 ,
� 1
� 6. Site Plan Review
The Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed development
and recommended revision of proposed plan subject to specific
conditions: open space and density of dwelling unit size. �
7. Zoning Enforcement History
None of record.
8. Public Response
Staff has not received any comments with respect to this project.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS:
1. Consistency with General Plan
The proposed land use is cansistent with the existing zoning
classification (R-3) and the General Plan designation (Multi-Family
Residential). The predominant land uses in the area are
residential. Therefore, granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 9
will not be inconsistent with the General Plan.
2. Site Suitability ,
The subject property is not adequate in size and shape to
accomodate the proposed development relative to the proposed
density, bulk of the structures, parking, walls, fences,
landscaping, driveways and other development features required by
the Zoning Ordinance. Further, the subject property is
adequately served with the required public utilities and offers
adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility.
Louise Avenue is sixty (60') feet wide in the vicinity of the
project and given its status as a local street, it is sufficient
for carrying the required traffic volume that would be generated by
the proposed use.
3. Compliance with Development Standards
The proposed deve'lopment does not meet all the standards required
by the Zoning Ordinance regarding off-street parking; front,
side, and rear yard setbacks; distance between structures; lot
coverage, building height; unit size and landscaping. The code
requires a minimum of 25$ open space landscaping; the proposed
development provides approximately 34�. However, the
development standards of open space and density by the applicant
are not adequate to protect adjacent residential uses with
respect to increase traffic in the area that may be generated by
the proposed project.
' 4. Conditions of Approval
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions recommended
by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect
, on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or
endanger the public health, safety, convenience or welfare.
5. Benefits to Community
The proposed development will aid in aesthetically upgrading the
neighborhood and will act as a catalyst in fostering other
quality developments in the area. Furthermore, the development,
if modified, would add favorably to the City's housing stock and
will provide additional affordably-priced housing in furtherance
of the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan.
DISK 47:CUP9
2
, 6. Environmental Assessment
The project is Categorically Exempt as determined by the
Cal3fornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. The
Categorical Exemption has been prepared, and is on file in the .
Office of the City Clerk and the Community Development '
. Department.
7. Determination of Appropriate Findings
Staff analysis of the proposed project include (A) Lack of Useable
open space and (B) Overtilization of property.
Despite meetinq the requirements to build five (5) units, the
proposal specifically falls short of Section 25-4 b.2, and, in
particular useable open space. Although approximately sixty
four (64�) percent of the.property is open space, only nine
(9�) percent is available for useable open spaces. The
remainder of the open space is paved for vehicular
accessibility. The lack of inadequate useable open space can
be mitigated by reducing the unit size which in turn will
mitigate the potential of over burdening of off-street parking
created by large units.
Recommendation:
Staff respectfully requests, after consideration, the Planning
Commission
A. Adopt the attached Resolution No. 2271 with the conditions to 1)
Develop three (3), three (3) bedroom units, and two (2), two (2)
bedroom units; and 2) provide more useable open space.
1. The project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the
State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061b(3).
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 9 subject to the stated
conditions and requirements.
OR
B. Deny Conditional Use Permit Case No. 9 for the project as
proposed by the applicant.
DISK 47:CUP9
�
3
..i'
� � _��c'�►�'�nN nnQ,p
. __ .��:_ .
_�
,,
„ HD , y . . �� � . .
F '.. OffCNIYQ1010 '�. b �� AY —' �—" .
� � � � a F'� - . !7 . ! ` 4 .
N �T� . ' .Y! 41/S 1 'Sy ..
. . `'�'1� � - :�., `; ' '° 1, � � a w �: 4 _�i.o_ $ � st F-1'—` �`.
� c ., 7' - � ,.ie. —1
... . ii � �1+-� O NO $ 6/.O! I ' e
� 1�� r Z�1 I d h rb, y ` ��i�o �� � � .
.. � 9�• .• � Y�n i __�_����- ^
� � M�- 1 �Z /J $ �n ��SU 471 1
. , ( nr. f `` ss IJIn/i'� 1�
1 ,� �'. ( � O ^ n � Pi' � � ��iti .Y . ��
�u. � �
;;::: — '6—�—�
"�.. � < �a S
, � "��..m ° . .,.., ..,e .��
1�'�� ' 4�\) — _ .
� »` r,.. 6� w Q� /S ,MiTM �_ b E . 20a67 1. .
[J �sc Q
' IP:.. _ l0?.S/ _L
ni O ��. Ji � /Q t V �� i00.fQ �
ll�•'�t F �1�-0� �> ` ___�`1i��t � `_/� ��r t r�ID� •
�:.> ��z.•. #y.f
Ir.,�� p r1�.> >C\ / 1 , ... T � $ ,esp,.asa Ioo.0 = C
r i g F-- iso.�v "^ �
.�j, $ ... . -- — �_.ro _L �lts.� � ` :
..,. �d:.c —�� �,,, I ,,, �
�,., : ,.. sss.� � Y
';,,,, �_ , ,
g""' n.� i � � I� ii I� ° �.".. � �� ."
�
� .� oTioTm � T� -Li rf2-__L- _
' � � � $p:_. • `�1 A � I � 11_ � ii !s),SS " a
� a,.. �. �.: � 1 �nr „_ 6/ ,�.,� 1!
.�r � ��` �__ : � � L I il{r� ��.�x —T— I P!
- ` nsf � D r�. p� � � � �n� � „a.�
• '
. � s .lANOACN $ r � .w �,.� i .
' �� � ..,.. rf i o �,.�� � � _� —, 6�0 ����+ x o
. �� l ba 6 .� sn i v re � w� b �� �� ��ee. ro na.s e
. G.l6S ♦ .`� `r "� c �� � I� i�p � o ,. O 0 �.wc !!3 �.�.� F
� e Ya��w � : �_ .a„ '^ , • ,,,_,
�� a � Z 1 Z - /! ��'�� � � .,a,. s� ����i Z
�
. � . !st � � . "�` es�n � ,ax,
��„ ,, a �e_ �t ,,.. s
- � � d � . - - . Autt - j-Sd ��ii�ii
!f! ,4 ..,. � p -iaT $� .
Il � ••w $ • /fI7/ . N/. „ ar !0
A „... �.,,. � N _ _ n _ _ �.ss ti
_-0SZ- m�� i �„ ncsu nvs�s• �
.. 7t , �a- n.,o s � " � _At _� o $ oin� — I� —' ��»s� b
uv � — — � — �.�r Q
r � Ni�� � ..�1 �
in„ 2 �.... n �
L �� y a �� Q K u �� • x h � ia+s _ 1— is�.� _� 4
- — !6� � .. � _ (J � l.�u I .:i i �
M o a ��,.. � ���.., J $ r�
!Sf � 7 . � � . k � ,_..� �e .s7 � i.+
� i�„�
. �! ~ } �.,-_ if,o,... � t�s.sN.
�c.��' �
r
RESOLUTION N0. 2271
....- ... ........��....r.��t i +.. m�... *....�nTrcri. r.nu�.r+�nr..w7 OF THE ,
CITY OF LYNWO�D APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
pERMIT NO. 9 FOR CdNSTRUCTION OF FIVE DWELLSNG .
UNITS CONSISTING OF THREE, THREE (3) BEDROOM AND
TWO, TWO (2) BEDROOM UNITS AT 11265 LOUISE AVENUE,
LyNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, IN THE R-3 (MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL) ZONE.
WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law,
conducted a public hear'ing on subject application for a
Conditional Use Permit; and `
WHEREAS, the Planninq Commission carefully considered all
pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development director has determined .
that the proposal is Exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines Section 150b1 b(3), as Amended; and
WHEREAS, the site is located in the R-3 (Multi-Family
' Residential) zone, subject to the granting of a Conditional Use
Permit.
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines as follows:
A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and
shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls,
landscaping, driveways and other development features
required by the Zoning Ordinance.
B. The granting of the proposed Conditional Use Permit will
not adversely affect the Lynwood General Plan.
C. The structures as proposed, or modified, subject to
conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values
of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger
the public health, safety or welfare.
D. The site will be developed pursuant to the current zoning
regulations and site plan submitted reviewed and
, approved by the Site Plan Review Committee.
E. The proposed development will add favorably to the
housing stock and will provide additional affordably
priced housing in concert with the policies of the
Housing Element of the General Plan.
F. The proposed development will aid in aesthetically
upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in
fostering other quality developments.
' Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby
approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. CUP 9, provided the
following conditions are observed and complied with at all times.
DISK 48:COACUP9
1
.:: _ CO DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Gener
1. The proposed development sha11 comply with all applicable
regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform
Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code.
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or
structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community
Development Department, Planning Division, for review of
. said Conditional Use Permit.
3. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a
Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read,
understands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution
before any building permits are issued.
4. Construction shall be completed within six (6) month,s from
date of issuance of building permits.
5. This permit shall become void one hundred twenty (120) days,
unless extended, after the use permitted has been abandoned
or has ceased to be actively exercised.
PLANNING DIVISION �
6. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood
• main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving
the proposed development.
7. Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25$)
percent of the lot area.
8. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance
with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the
Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits.
The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs
combined with ground cover as follows: Single-Family: One
(1) five (5) gallon shrub for each 100 square feet of
landscaped area; and two (2) fifteen gallon trees for each
500 square feet of landscaped area.
9. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped
and shall consist predominantly of plant materials except
for necessary walks, drives and fences.
10. A minimum of five two-car garages shall be provided.
11. A six (6') foot high block wall shall be installed along the
side and rear of the property, except within the twenty
(20') foot front yard setback, which shall not exceed four
feet (9') in height. Construction of a fence in the front
yard setback is optional (not required).
12. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet.
13. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved.
DISK 48:COACUP9
2
14. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in a
sani'tary :. conditioa pending construction and shall be '
„
.. � :L.ai a�i:i�.''::.:CZ 1L1 J t'il .a'C. [?::-� _ .. --' ..�. � ' .. .. ' '.il
FaiTure to comply may result in revocation of the
Conditional Use Permit.. '
BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION
15. Accoustical constructian materials shall be used throughout the
units to mitigate freeway noise to the standards and
satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division.
16. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective material
including shingles, woodshake, asphalt composite, crushed
rock and other similar roofing material that is not
reflective, glossy, or polished and/or roll form type metal
roofing..
17. Residential structures shaZl have an exterior siding of
brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar °
material other than the reflective, glossy, polished and/or
. rool-formed type metal siding.
18. Final building elevations, including materials of
construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the
Building Official and the Planning Division prior. to
issuance of any building permits.
19. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer
shall pay $1.53 per square foot for residential buildings to
the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government
Code Section 53080.
20. The one-bedroom units must be a minimum of 600 square feet.
The two-bedroom unit must be a minimum of 900 square feet.
` 21. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the
street dedications.
22. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the
exterior elevation of the building must be approved by the
Community Development Director or his/her designee.
23. Trash areas shall be enclosed by a five (5') foot high
decorative masonry walls with gates.
24. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in
a consistent manner, including the incorporation within the
side and rear building elevations of same or all of the
design elements used for the primary (front) facades.
25. To encourage visual interest, building elevations greater
than 35 feet in length shall be differentiated
architecturally by recessed entries and windows, designer
windows, off-set planes and/or other architectural details
in a harmonious manner to provide dimensional relief to the
satisfaction of the Director of Cotmnunity Development.
26. The applicant submit elevation drawings to the Planning
Division showing the exterior building design; including the
_,. specification of colors, and materials.
27. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally
compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent
buildings. In addition, no securitp fences, grills, etc.
sha12 be installed without the pzior written approval of the
Community Development Director or his/her designee.
DTSK 48:COACUP9
3
;
28. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment,
�'. swimmina pool pumps and heaters and aIl other mechanical
., � .. - ,,:, ., ,: ,.�d . �.v, y'�..:: raar vwrA Or ctraof sirio
llevioz`o �ui1�:1i 5... lOC:%Y..... F+i u� . .
yard 'of a corner lot. Such equipment sha11 be sc:reened
from surrounding properties and streetuje�d and P comfort tha of
they do not disturb the peace, cI �
neighboring residents, in accordance with the City's Noise
Ordinance.
PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING
29. Submit a copy of property deed or recent title report to the
Department of Public Works. Applicant may be required to do
a lot line adjust or parcel map.
30. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered .
Civil Engineer. Property is located within 100 year flood
• zone area. Pad elevations shall be 1 foot above flood level
zone per flood boundary map. Also conform to all applicable
codes per Section 12 1/2 of Lynwood Municipal Code.
Building above flood level will require substantial amount
of fill, therefore, suggest alternative methods of design to
minimize amount of livable space at ground level.
31. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk along Louise Avenue.
32. Construct 24" wide gutter and asphalt pavement along
property frontage on Louise Avenue.
33. Reconstruct damaged and substandard drive approach(es), per
, City standards.
34. Construct two wheelchair ramp(s) at northwest and southwest
corners of Louise Avenue and Sanborn Avenue.
35. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected
separately. Construct laterals as necessary.
36. Root prune and trim 2 existing tree(s) and install root
barriers at back of sidewalk.
37. Install 2 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood standards
along Louise Avenue.
Species to be Crape Myrtle. A permit to install the trees
is required by the Engineering Division. Exact locations of
the tree(s) will be determined at the time the permit is
issued.
38. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass.
39. Provide and install one marbelite street pole with light
fixture, underground services and conduits along Louise
Avenue.
40. Underqround all utilities.
41. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all
off-site improvements.
42. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire
protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The
work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by
the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the
Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any
work.
q3. Provide proof that lot was legally created.
DISK 48:COACUP9
4
_
. 44. Reconstruct damaged curb along Louise Avenue.
45.��--Remon� graffiti from sidewalk.
FIRE DEPARTMENT •
46. Provide approved smoke detectors for each unit.
47. Provide one (1) approved 2A type fire extinguisher within
seventy five (75') travel distance on each floor.
48. Provide a minimum 150 feet four inches (150'4" dry fire
line. (Obtain specific requirements from Fire Department.)
49. Post "NO PARKING SIGNS" in driveway.
50. If security gates are installed on premises, the locking
mechanism shall be of the type that does not require a key
any special knowledge to exit premises. Also, provide a
Knox box at entrance.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of May, 1989, by members of
the Planning Commission votinq as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Donald A. Dove, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes
Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney
DISK 48:COACUP9
5
'
DATE : May 9, 19 8 9 a�; �`�•,,! j'� L' ---� r, ,� i,`I n____�-
.. '. � i.... � . ..� � �� 1 0 Cr� •
TO: PLANNING CONII�'lISSION CASL �' � _�� f # 1 I
�i�1. —
' FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit- Case No. 11
Applicant: Estela Mayans/Octavia Romero
Proposal•
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit
to develop eighteen (18) two-bedroom, two story apartment
dwellings at 3287 Lynwood Road in the R-3 (Multi-Family) zone.
Fact: '
Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a
Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to build or relocate
dwelling units in the R-3 zone.
However, upon further review staff found that the zoning
classification (i.e. R-3 Multi-family Residential) is in conflict
with the general plan designation (i.e. Single Family) State law
prohibits local governments from processing development proposals
in inconsistent areas.
Recommendation: �
Staff respectfully requests that the Planning Commission remove �
this item from the agenda. i
I
DISK 48:CUP11 I
I
I
I
�
I
I
i
i
�
i
:i :
'�'. CUP 12
r
DATE: MaY 9, 1989 [p ,�1'� �T. q n �f� �
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION AG L ( �� .J '`� � ' • �
C����r �uP
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director ,�, _. , ,. ___.... —.
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -CASE NO. 12 (CUP 12)
Applicant: Sergio Lopez
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit
to develop two two-story townhouses at 11670 Virginia Avenue, in
the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone.
FACTS:
After reviewing the conditions of approval from the Engineering
(Public works) Department prior to and at the Site Plan Review
Committee meeting of April 20, 1989, the applicant decided not to go
forward with the development at this time. His decision was based on
the cost involved in the construction of the proposed dwelling units
in relation to the Engineering Department's Flood Plain Map.
Attached please find a copy of the letter from the applicant on the
above matter.
i
Recommended Action
Staff respectfully request that this item be removed from the agenda
until such time that the applicant decides to go ahead with the
proposed project.
�
I
f
I
�
�
�
I
I
�
I
f
i
i
�
I
DISK 47:CUP12A i
�
�
�.
1 '
a
�� .
SBRGIO LOPEZ
8409 FLOftENCE # 202
DOWNEY, CA. 90240
MAY 3rd, 1989
CITY OF LYNWOOD
ATTN: VICENTE L. MAS
11330 BULLIS RD.
LYNWOOD, CA. 90262
DEAR MR. MAS:
THIS IS TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCY FOR
THE PROJECT AT 11670 VIRGINIA AVE. FOR THE NEXT REVIEW BOARD
MEETING. DUE TO THE NEW FLOOD REGULATION MY CUSTOMERS ARE I
REVIEWING THE POSIBILITY OF GOING TO A THREE STORY PROJECT OR
MOST PROBABLY TO WAIT AT LEAST ONE MONTH TO SEE IF THE CITY COULD I
SOLVE IN A DIFFERENT WAY THE FLOOD REQUIREMENTS.
AS SOON AS I HAVE AN AhSWER FROM MY CUSTOMERS I WILL GET IN I
TOUCH WITH YOL'.
SINCERELY, ;
� /' I
SER 0 L E' I
I
i
�
�
I
I
i
I
I
�
i
f
I
I
1 '
�
i
��� � A ���:,,t-,,�, ;� - - . � �
�� ; �_:, , , : : � . __.__ ---��
DATE: May 9, 1989 i I T r I� ��
' - C�' �;_ ;•.., �,
TO: YLAt. .l':�iG ;;al �d� �l �. t Y ., __... _.....__ ....�...-„�q
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department .
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 21029 - CASE NO. TPMS
� Applicant(s): Robert Terrell
PROPOSAL: •
The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map (No.
21029) for the purpose of consolidating three parcels, that run
in a North-Southerly direction between Long Beach Boulevard and
School Street in the C-2A (Medium Commercial) zone.
FACTS
1. Source of Authority.
Section 25-18, et seq., Subdivision Requlations of the
Lynwood Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act,
Government Code Section 66410, et seq require that a parcel map
be recorded for the consolidation of several lots into a
single parcel.
2. Propertv Location.
The subject parcels are located on the northwestern corner of
Long Beach Boulevard at Cedar Avenue.(Refer to attached
Location Map.)
3. Existing Land Use I
One of the parcels is currently developed with an existing
building but the other two parcels are vacant with the I
following uses: i
North - Medium Commercial East - Medium Commercial �
South - Medium Commercial West - Medium Commercial �
i
4. Land Use Desianation. �
i
The General Plan designation for the property is Commercial; �
the zoning classification is C-2A (Medium Commercial). �
The surrounding land use designations are as follows: j
I
General Plan Zonin ;
North - Commercial C-2A �
South - Commercial C-2A i
East - Co�mnercial � �
West - Commercial C-2A �
6. Site Plan Review. �
At its regular meeting on April 20, 1989, the Site Plan ;
Review Committee recommended approval to the Planning �
Commission subject to the conditions in the attached resolution. �
i
DISK 47: TPM5 �
(
I
� � �
I
1
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
Environmental Assessment.
The Community Development Department has determined that the
project could not have a significant effect on the environment.
Therefore, a Notice of Exemption has been prepared and is on file
in the Community Development Department and the office of the
City Clerk.
Staff analysis of this proposed lot consolidation include the
following findings: (a) Design of the proposed site; and (b)
Consistency of the proposed site with the General Plan.
Desian of the proposed site consolidation
a. The design of the proposed lot consolidation shows the
consolidated lots to be in character with existing Commercial
developments in the area.
b. The proposal is meant for the consolidation of three lots in
order to allow better utilization of the property.
c. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed
density of the development permitted by the General Plan and
zoning ordinance in that the parcels are substantially flat
and able to support the type of development proposed.
Consistencv of the site with the General Plan
a. Staff's inspection shows the site to be compatible with the
City of Lynwood's General Plan as the General Plan limits
land use activities to those projects that enhance the I
function and quality of residential developments without �
altering significantly the character of the existing
environment. �
i
b. The size and location of the proposed project does not �
significantly change the character of the existing �
environment. �
c. The proposed consolidation is consistent with the Zoning �
classification of C-2A and the General Plan designation of '
Commercial. �
RECOMMENDATION(S): �
I
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the �
Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2274. ;
,�
1. Finding that Tentative Parcel Map No. 21029, Case No. 5,
will not have a significant effect on the environment and �
is therefore exempt. I
2. Approving Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 5, subject to the �
stated conditions and requirements. i
Attachments: i
i
1. Location Map �
2. Resolution No. 2274 i
3. Tentative Parcel Map No. 21029 i
I
i
DISK 47:TPM5 �
i
I
2
_ . I
, . LOCATION MAP
;
� 'O1 � ��'` q� � 117 . �� � '� � � 'o . .. _
.� m
� � .s
�o � �� � � �� � ' . :
�i' 1 R � rs I p � d � . j• 6 _
.� � � �
I ' , p � � 3 � �w � I ^ � �d [ � / RC/N/,� ' � � ° � � •'
ti '
1. . � �s I ' • .
.sy . P � �
�P I � � �� rl "� a. q 1 p �h�� . +�,� �.3� � � 1 ' �r � � . .
r � � � IR 1� . �! n � ro v � J?
,��� r � w ' so� tr7+�p '' •�I a � `y "� � � �� b .
I M o 4 ".: , �J � `� `� i
'° n a '°° � , � � " si `' n" °+ '�' � : M � r
"'°"' . Q '�t'.�. � _ �C ay �`y h �
' o - , b �, � c� SM �Q,- . 8 " � e � v
� AG
� ^°� ro �l � a a �io e .. � � �,1 � �'ES y
1 �J y p 7!I
v
�s h� � i � M � � i
� n 1oi �e / oi �B � ,� v�' � J, 0
r x ei �M ro � �' ��v
� na� ' ia .a�� ��wi� a+ s� es ^' .Y �o v
{� � � � �d a. � T e � ro v
.).• .�y. � )°) � �/)N Q � ' �p� � '
.A �I �y AS��OS It� A ��o'so .� J,�a /?3 � M� i�
' +o �+�i . h v � � � � //p .(� �
• � i � � �yEMUf JJY�F.%P � b � M � '`� � //
^5 // (
�o Q � . o � . o v � � ��3 ii1 ii,
° �� � b � �s � 3 `7
� 9 • , . �, � � i
'��' a � M ��° _ wro ��;io m �as �r� ,� �� �/ � v �, �
�I ' v I
� � i�� q.D . � �� �y GU ty V � v
�pll i V � 4a. �'1 /� v �+ �.
� I W • /9� .� �.•� v I � �7� /.ib � 'y� n I
, � � i I
� � ,,, , ,,, : Q : � _ ; � ,� ,� � ` I
� �.'y��iy ��dl A a b � QN � � � (� � � ^) � • !b I
� �'S !7 � '!` � � 1 � � ''�^ ���n � � . � r6? . I
8. �
. . �', . �p ��A� ' p � � �O �, �� �
P . �: � a �y .ru � . � d S �� ' J'�e qq �h � �^ �� ' iao
�l �s ^� ro � n, 3° � u � �. � J�' 6 °' ° �7/no/ p 1 � � o
r � . ^� � ro � p ° ' !62 t.a� h � � 6 ` • ��b� � i
( � �, '�� '�i i� „ �y .. � e,s� ^� '� v �7? � �. I
/ � �ts " � . � f"� I�� 1�,� i
I , �'� � I � � � e � �� ro M'c C• I � I
J
I " ��. . '° „' ° J ��' av �. ,; ' I
I � °°t �' � e,t� r�
a o �� ,a�� e �'�; n are �l � ' ' � � i i
. ^' . � / ° ;"' ^ � at9 � � •'� \ „�'� � .M- T ^ ° n s � ' � • i
� . a �� I
_ ��° row, a�° 3 ^ / B UHrpA, -� ' "{' •n .�� 5 �� ,^ I 1 e �
7'
.. . ....:_. .: � . .
��' •cn� ._ �� 'I
i
�
C�4�E � i PM �. ,
,
�
N ;
J� �
w i
�
, �: r ,�. �
RESOLUTION NO. 2274
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CONIINISSION OF THE ,
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.
21029 TO COMBZNE LOTS 835, 836, AND 837, OF TRACT NO.
3078 MB 31-48 PER MAP RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject
application; and
wHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined
that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines, as amended; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered all
pertinent testimony offered in the case as presented at the public
hearing; and
WHEREAS, the preparation, filing and recordation of Parcel Map
is required for development; and
Section 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that said Tentative Parcel Map No. 21029 should be
approved for the following reasons:
A. The combination of lots meet all the applicable
requirements and conditions imposed by the State
Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of
the Lynwood Municipal Code. i
B. The proposed combination of lots is consistent with the �
applicable elements of the General Plan and the i
Official Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lynwood. i
i
C. Proper and reasonable provisions have been made for �
adequate ingress and egress to the lots being combined. !
I
D. Proper and adequate provisions have been made for all �
public utilities and public services, including sewers. j
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood ;
hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 21029 in the C-2A ;
(Medium Commercial) zone, subject to the following conditions j
Communitv Development Department Conditions !
1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City �
Departments.
2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a �
Statement of Acceptance stating that he has read, �
understands, and agrees to the conditions imposed by the
Planning Commission, before any building permits are issued. !
I
�
�
�
i
DISK 47:RES02274 '
; i
1
I
,; Planning Division Conditions
3. Within twenty-four (24) months after approval or conditional
approval of Tentative Parcel Map, the subdivider shall file
with the City of Lynwood, a Final Map in substantial
conformance with the Tentative Parcel Map as approved or
conditionally approved, and in conformance with the
Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the
City of Lynwood.
4. No grading permit or building permit shall be issued prior
to recordation of final map or another appropriate
instrument approved by the City of Lynwood, a Final Map in
substantial conformance with the Tentative Parcel Map as
approved or conditionally approved, and in conformance with
the Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of
the City of Lynwood.
5. Extension of the Tentative Map approval shall only be
considered if the applicant or his/her representative,
submits a written request for extension to the Community
Development Department stating the reasons for the request,
at least thirty (30) days before map approval is due to
expire, pursuant to, and in compliance with, Section 25-18,
of the subdivision regulations of the City of Lynwood.
6. The Final_Parcel Map shall be filed with the City Engineer
of the City of Lynwood.
Department of Public works/Engineerina Conditions
7. All conditions of the State Map Act and the City's
subdivision Ordinance must be met prior to recordation.
All matters and improvements shall be consistent with the
ordinances, standards, and procedures of the City's
Development Standards, Enqineering Procedures and
Standards, Water Standards, and Planting Standards of the
Department of Parks and Recreation.
The Developer is responsible for checking with staff for
clarification of these requirements.
8. Submit a Subdivision Guarantee to this office.
The final map shall be based on a field survey or record
data if sufficient data is available. All surveying for
the proposed development will be done by the Developer, i
including the establishment of centerline ties. Enclose ;
with the final map the surveyor's closure sheets. i
9. Developer shall pay all applicable development fees I
including drainage, sewer, water and parkway trees prior to i
issuance of any buildings permits. �
Pay Parcel Map checking fees prior to checking. �
Pay $100 monument checking fee prior to recordation �
Deposit $50 with City Engineer to guarantee receipt by City I
of recorded, reproducible mylar, parcel map prior to
recordation.
I
I
DISK 47:RES02274
i
2 !
I
All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection
' fees are to be paid prior to recording the final map. All
requirements to the serving utilities to be met or
guarantee prior to recording of the final map.
10. Grading and Draining �
A grading plan signed by a registered Civil Engineer shall
be submitted for the approval of the Director of Public
Works/City Engineer and the Director of Community
Development. The grading plan shall include the topography
of all contigous properties and streets and shall provide
for the methods of drainage in accordance with all
applicable City standards. Retaining walls and other
protective measures may be required. Offsite drainage
easements may be necessary. The structural section of all
parking areas shall be designed by a Civil Engineer based
upon soils analysis supplied by a recognized and approved
soils engineering firm. The structural section shall be
approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. In
the event that the design is not provided, the minimum
structural section that will be approved by the Director of
Public Works/City Engineer would be 2 inches of asphalt on
4 inches of untreated rock base.
Submit to this office a Geologic/SOils Report signed by a
Registered Soils Enqineer.
11. Sewers
The development shall be provided with public sewers.
Connect to public sewer. Provide laterals as necessary. �
Design of all sanitary sewers shall be approved by the I
Director of Public works/City Engineer. '
I
12. Water Systems I
The Developer shall construct a water system including I
water services, fire hydrants and appurtenances through the i
development as required by the Director of Public �
Works/City Engineer. The Developer shall submit a water �
system plan to the City of Lynwood Fire Department for fire �
hydrant locations. The City will install water meters
only. Payment for said meters shall be made to the City
prior to issuance of building permits. The Developer shall �
install on-site water facilities includings stubs for water �
meters and fire hydrants on interior and on boundary
arterial streets.
�
All conditions of the Lynwood Fire Department must be met �
prior to recordation. I
13. Public Easements and Right-of-way �
Where drainage, sewer and other such easements are i
required, the minimum easement width shall be ten (10) feet
to facilitate maintenance unless otherwise approved by the I
Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
i
Dedicate a ten (10) £oot wide strip of property along Long I
Beach Boulevard. Dedicate a ten (10) foot wide strip of
property along Cedar Avenue. Dedicate sufficient property
at northeast corner of Cedar Avenue and Long Beach i
Boulevard to accommodate a radius.
(
I
'
DISK 47:RES02274 '
I
3 �
i
I
�
� 14. Sidewalks
Design, configuration and locations shall be subject to the
approval of the Director of Public Wroks/City Engineer, and
the Director of Community Development. Ramps for .
physically handicapped persons shall be provided both on-
site and off-side as required by State and local
regulations.
15. Dust Control and Pedestrian Safety
Prior to the issuance of demolition or grading permits,
the developer shall:
a. Submit a plan indicating safety methods to be provided
to maintain safe pedestrian ways around all areas of
construction. This may require proper and adequate
signs, fences, barricades, or other approved control
devices as required by the Director of Community
Development.
16. The Developer shall install all public improvements, as
required by the Director of Public Works/City Enqineer
prior to issuance of any occupancy permits for this
development. Public Improvements shall include but are not
limited to:
a. Reconstruction of PCC sidewalk along School Street.
b. Construction of new PCC sidewalk along Long Beach
Boulevard and Cedar Avenue in conjunction with widening
of said streets.
c. Construction of new PCC curb and gutter along Long
Beach Boulevard and Cedar Avenue, in conjunction with
widening of said streets.
d. Construction of (2) wheelchair ramps at southeast and
northeast corners of Long Beach and Cedar Avenue.
e. Installing marbelite street lights with underground
services and conduits.
f. Planting (10) parkway tree (eucalyptus) along Long
Beach Boulevard and School Street.
g. Construction of (16) tree wells with concrete covers along
Cedar Avenue, Long Beach Boulevard and School Street.
h. Underground all utilities.
i. Construct five foot wide planter to separate sidewalk
from parking area.
j. Prepare and submit street improvement plans for Cedar
Avenue and Long Beach Boulevard in conjunction with
street widening.
DISK 47:RES02274 '
�
i
�
f
4
I
I
� t. '
;;;,, ;^��:,�_ocate all existing street lights, traffic signal
1'egs and underground vaults in conflict with proposed'
street widening on Long Beach Boulevard and Cedar
Avenue. -
All changes and repairs in existing curbs, gutters, and sidewalks
and other public improvements shall be paid for by the developer.
If improvements are to be guaranteed, a faithful performance bond
shall be posted by the developer to guarantee installation of
said public improvements and an agreement for completion of
improvements with the City Council shall be entered into. Submit
Policy of Insurance or bond protectinq City against damage or
injury to persons or property growing out of, related to, or
resulting from improvements or work. The Director of Public
Works/City Engineer will determine amount and form. Deposit with
the Director of Public Works/City Engineer before commencing any
improvements, a sum estimated by the Director of Public Works/City
Engineer to cover cost of inspection of all improvements under
his jurisdiction.
Section 3: A copy of Resolution No. 2274 the conditions
shall be delivered to the applicant.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 9th day of May 1989, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Donald A. Dove, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes
Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney
Disk 47:Reso2274
5
S��
! MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
�: PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
OPENING CEREMONIES �
A. Call to order
The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of
Lynwood was called to order by Chairperson Dove on the above
, captioned date at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City
Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California 90262.
S. P1�3ue of Allegiance
Commissioner Willis led the Pledge of Allegiance.
C_ Roll Call of Commissioners
Chairperson Dove requested the roll call, and Planning
Manager Fenderson complied.
Present: Commissioner ponald A. Dove
Commissioner Lena Cole-Dennis
Commissioner John K. Haynes
Commissioner Roy Pryor
Commissioner David J. Willis, Jr.
Mr. Fenderson informed the Commissioners that Commissioner Kanka
had requested an excused absence.
MOTION by Commissioner Iiaynes, SECONDED by Commissioner Willis,
to granE Commissioner Kanka an excused absence.
Also present: Rich Morillo, Attorney
Andrea Hooper, City Clerk
Aubrey D. Fenderson, Planning Manager
Authur Barfield, Planning Associate
Andrew B-Pessima, Planning Technician
Vicente L. Mas, Community Development Director
Toufic Semaan, Civil Engineering Assistant
Joy Valentine, Minutes Clerk
Approximately eight people were in the audience. i
D. Certification of Agenda Posting �
;
Mr. Fenderson stated that, per the Brown Act, the agenda had
been duly posted. �
E. Approval of Minutes
Mr. Fenderson and the Commissioners discussed the errors on
pages 7 and 9 of the April 11, 1989, minutes. The vote taken
on page 7 should read: I
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penalber, Pryor
and willis �
�
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
. �
ABSTAIN: Nane I
Disk 5: PCO50989 �
�
l
1 i
I
�
On Page 9, there were two votes recorded and the first vote
, taken should read:
° AYESi Commissioner5 Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penalber
NOES: None , �
ABSBNT: Commissioners Haynes, Kanka, Pryor
� ABSTAIN: Commissioners Haynes, Pryor, Willis
The second vote taken should read:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Penalber
" NOES: Commissioners Haynes, Pryor, Willis
ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
It was noted by staff that under Commission Orals on the March
14, 1989, meeting, Commissioner Cole-Dennis was recorded as
havinq two unexcused absences. In actuality, Commissioner Cole-
Dennis has always been present or granted an excused absence
� except for one time. That time she was out of town and
requested an excused absence which was not granted. Upon
return, Commissioner Cole-Dennis registered her indignation
because she is a single working parent who had to be out of town
at the time of the meeting and other Commissioners have been
qranted excused absences when they requested same because they
were out of town at the time of the meeting.
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner
Willis, to appove the minutes of March 14, 1989, and April 11,
1989, as corrected. MOTION carried by the following vote:
� AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Haynes, Penalber,
Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
Swearing In of New Commissioners
City Clerk Andrea Hooper stated that the City Council vacated
the Commission at the April 27, 1989, City Council meeting and
then voted to reinstate Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Kanka,
Haynes, Pryor and Willis. All commissioners reinstated will
serve out their terms as originally set by their appointment
dates. Carlton McMiller was appointed as the seventh
Commissioner and Jamal Muhsin was appointed as an alternate to
serve as long as Commissioner Kanka is recuperating from the
automobile accident in which she was injured. City Clerk Hooper
then administered the pledge to the two men.
Chairperson Dove welcomed the new Commissioners.
_. Reorganization of Planning Commission
Commissioner Cole-Dennis nominated Chairperson Dove for another
term as Chairperson and the nominatian was seconded by
Commissioner Willis.
DISK M5:PCO50989
2
� Commissioner Willis closed the nominations.
Chairperson Dove retained his position as chairperson by the
following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, McMiller,
Muhsin, Willis
NOES: Commissioner Pryor, �aynes
ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
Commissiorier Pryor, seconded by Commissioner Willis, nominated
Commissioner Haynes as Vice-Chairperson. Commissioner Haynes
received the only nomination and he became Vice-Chairperson by
the following vote:
• AYES: Commissioners Dove, McMiller, Muhsin, Pryor,
Willis
NOES: Commissioner Cole-Dennis
ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Conditional Use Permit Case No. 2
11300 Spruce Street (Lynwood Unified School District)
; A School District representative in the audience asked if
this could be deferred until Joe Battle arrived at the
meeting. Chairperson Dove asked the Commissioners and all
agreed that Item No. 1 could be skipped until the
representative arrived.
2. Variance Case No. 2
10971 San Vicente Avenue (Ceneyda Reyes)
Applicant requests approval of a parking variance that would
allow her to provide only three one-car garages rather than
� the required six parking spaces.
Staff has made many attempts to reach the applicant's
consultant without success. Staff requests that this item
be continued to the Planning Commission's regularly
scheduled meeting of June 13, 1989.
MOTION by Commissioner Pryor to continue Item No. 2, Variance
Case No. 2, to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the
Planning Commission on June 13, 1989, SECONDED by
Commissioner Willis. .
DISK MS:PCO50989
3
MOTION carried by the following vote:
•.�,,
i.Yi:S: ..�nur,��siori�rs ilove, ,�aY..�s; �icMiller, Muhsin, Pryor,
Willis
NOES: Ccle-Dennis �
ABSENT: Commissioners Kanka
ABSTAIN: None •
3. Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case No. 2 Regulatina Property
Maintenanc Citywide
Staff proposes to amend Chapter 25, the official Zoning
Ordinance, with respect to property maintenance Citywide.
It was recommended by staff that the Commissioners should
review the proposed ordinance and consider same at their next
regularly scheduled meeting on June 13, 1989.
Mr. Mas informed the Commissioners that staff will be glad to
discuss the material with them if they should so desire, as
long as there are not enough of them present to constitute a
quorum.
MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner
Haynes, to continue Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case No. 2 to
their next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning
Commission on June 13, 1989.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Haynes, McMiller,
Muhsin, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS
4. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 9(CUP 9)
11331 Wright Road, Lynwood (Jose L. Lopez)
Applicant requests approval in order to build a two-story,
five-unit apartment building in the R-3 zone.
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing and Joseph Chang,
4333 E. Slauson Avenue, Maywood, rose to introduce his daughter
Sun Fon Chang, same address, who read from a prepared text.
Ms. Chang stated they had worked very hard and their
proposal should be approved because their design meets all
minimum requirements. She stated they are providing 40� more
landscaping than the minimum requirement.
� Mr. Fenderson stated that the City of Lynwood is not legally
required to accept the minimum requirements. The Lynwood
zoning ordinance does not reflect the present problems of
Lynwood, such as the constantly increasing population, which
results in parkinq problems requiring more spaces plus the
need for additional open space for children to play and
adults to relax. He stated that if four adults, each with
one car, move into a unit, and two spaces are provided, then
that means two cars parked on the street.
4
� . ..f. �� � } . � ..
pA
Mr. " �.� �'c* ;,a ... `-"-'"�a `-he ��:nmission that staff
� originally requested� only four units and, while they are
willing to accept five units, they are unwilling to accept
five three-bedroom units as now proposed by.the Chang family.
Mr. Chang stated their present design is the best they have
, been able to provide but they are willing to compromise and
try a new design.
Commissioner Haynes stated that staff has been working on
this proposal, and the Changs must understand that the
Commissioners want adequate open space and adequate parking
spaces. He informed *he Changs that the Commission is not
. required to accept the absolute minimum requirements of
the City Code, the Commission would not be needed if only
minimum requa.rements were going to be the rule in Lynwood.
He added the staff is now working on a new parking ordinance
to alleviate the present parking problems in Lynwood.
Chairperson Dove asked if anyone else was present who wished
� to speak in favor of the proposal. There being no one, he
asked if anyone wished to speak against the proposal.
Patricia Carr, 3842 Le Sage, rose to state hat her daughter
attends Hosler Junior High School, built to accommodate 1700
students and now accommodating 2500 to 2600 students. She
stated that Washington Elementary School is also overloaded
with student:s. She added that the Board of Education has
appealed to the City of Lynwood for a moritorium on housing
permits at this time. They are not asking for a total stop,
just a resting period for the present time, she said.
Joe Battle, 4304 Carlin, who both works for the Lynwood Board
of Education and lives in Lynwood, stated that the the Board.
of Education wants low growth, not no growth, but low growth,
at this time. He went to Sacramento to ask for two bond
issues in order to raise more money. He stated he has seen
townhouses that are already built and can't be sold so now
the builders are trying to rent them with little success.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairperson Dove
closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis stated her agreement with
°. Commissioner Haynes.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis remembered a staff report in
December or January that stated not enough building is taking
place in Lynwood.
- Mr. Mas stated the problems are not a result of
overdevelogment, but a very large increase in population,
which means there is a larqe increase in population in
existinq units, resulting in overcrowded living conditions.
Mr. Mas stated his desire to control density and added that
this could be a nice project if properly designed.
MOTION by Commissioner Haynes to continue Conditional Use
Permit - Case No. 9 to the next regularly scheduled meeting
of the Planning Commission on June 13, 1989, SECONDED by
Commissioner Willis.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Haynes, McMiller,
Muhsin, Pryor, willis
DISK MS:PCO50989'
5
v NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
ABSTAIN: None .
5. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 11
, 3287 Lynwood Road (Estela Mayans)
Mr. Barfield suggested that the Commission table, not.remove,
this item until the inconsistency between the zoning map and
the general plan map is resolved. Mr. Fenderson stated this
would probably be a year or so into the future because staff
is now at work revising both the gener�l plan and 2oning
laws.
MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner
Haynes, to table Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 11 until
the inconsistency between the zoning plan and the general
plan has been resolved.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Haynes, McMiller,
Muhsin, Pryor, Willis
NOES': None
ABSENT: Commissioner:� Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
At this time, it was decided to return to Item No. 1.
6. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 2
11300 Spruce Street (Lynwood Unified School District)
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing and Joe Battle,
4304 Carlin, rose to state that a continuing problem has been
that the School Board holds their meeting on the second
Tuesday of every month, just like the Planning Commission.
Now, he added, there will be a School Board representative
present at every Planning Commission meeting.
Darrin McGavin, 3775 lOth Street, Riverside, the architect of
the proposed buildinq, stated it will take about a year to
finish the building.
A1 Penalber, 3775 Lugo, rose to express his appreciation for
having been a part of the Commission for one year and four
months, welcomed the new Commissioners and expressed his opinion
that the Commission should work both with the School Board and
the general public.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairperson Dove
closed the Public Hearing.
. MOTION by Commissioner Haynes, SECONDED by Commissioner
Willis, to approve Resolution No. 2256, "A RESOLUTION OF THE
CZTY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) NO. 2
TO CONSTRUCT A TWO-STORY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE BUILDING IN
THE CF (COMMUNITY FACILITIES) ZONE, subject to the stated
conditions and requirements, finding that said CUP carries
out the intent of Ordinance No. 1318, will not have a
significant effect on the environment and certifying the
Negative Declaration as adequate.
DISK MS:PCO50989
6
MOTION carried by the following vote:
" AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Havnes, Penalber,
Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
6. Conditional Use Permit Case No. 12 �
11670 Virginia Avenue (Sergio Lopez)
Applicant requests approval to develop two two-story townhouses
in the R-2 zone.
Applicant has decided to stop the development at this time, due
to the cost involved in the construction because of requirements
by the City based on the project's presence in the flood area.
MOTION by Commissioner Cole-Dennis, SECONDED by Commissioner
Pryor, to table Conditional Use Permit Case No. 12 until such
time as the applicant decides to proceed.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Haynes, McMiller,
Muhsin, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Kanka
ABSTAIN: None
7. Tentative Parcel Map No. 21029
Northwestern corner of Long Beach Boulevard at Cedar Avenue
(Robert Terrell)
Chairperson Dove and the other Commissioners discussed the map
with Mr. B-Pessima.
Mr. Mas showed an error in the map to the Commissioners.
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing and Robert Terrell,
13424 Hawthorne Boulevard, Hawthorne, the architect of the
proposed project, accepted all conditions required by the City.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis asked Mr. Terrell what he planned to build
and replied that there would be a family restaurant in the
existing building. The building will be extensively renovated by
the King Taco Restaurant chain, a responsible firm, he added.
Mr. Terrell stated that the King Taco Restaurant chain does not
serve alcohol in any of their other restaurants and do not plan
to serve alcohol at this site.
Mr. McMiller asked the number of people who could be served in
the proposed restaurant and Mr. Terrell replied, "75".
There being no one else wishing to speak in favor or in
opposition, Chairperson Dove closed the Public Hearing.
DISK MS:PCO50989
7
MOTION by Commissioner Hayne�, SECONDED by Commi.�sioner Willis,
to adopt Resolution No. 2274, "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
• COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
NO. 21029 TO COMBINE LOTS 835, G�::, l'.::% "'�'-, �F TRACT NO. 3078 iQL'
31-48 PER MAP RECORDED IN THE OFFSCE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY," subject to the .stated conditions and
requirements, and finding the project will not have a significant •
effect on the environment and is therefore exempt.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Haynes, McMiller,
Muhsin, Pryor, willis
NOES: None
AHSENT: Cormnissioners itanka
ABSTAIN: None
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS
None
STAFF COMMENTS:
Mr. Barfield distributed a memorandum about itesolution No.
2217, for Conditional Use Permit 88057, which is for the sale
of automobiles and minor automobile repair as required to make
the cars saleable, at 12123 Long Beach Boulevard. At this
time, CUP 88507 has been approved by the Pianning Commission,
' the Building Department has approved plans, a field check has
been made and now the applicant must submit approved grading
plans in order to obtain building permits for the proposed
development.
Mr. Battle asked the City to order modernization of the
bathrooms to accommodate handicapped persons through Code
Enforcement so he can go to Sacramento to get the money to pay
for same.
COMMZSSION ORALS:
Commissioner Haynes discussed the special City Council meeting
held last month and their desire to increase the public's
knowledge of the hearings held in this building.
Chairperson Dove stated he wants the public to know the
Commissioners don't just settle for the absolute minimum
requirements.
Commissioner Pryor stated that the town of Cudahy does not
permit the parking of cars on any City street durinq the hours
of 3:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m. and wondered if this could become the
law in Lynwood. Mr. Mas replied that the problem is the cost of
enforcing said law. He added that a recommendation could be
made to the Traffic and Parking Commission. Commissioner Pryor
stated that the fines paid for tickets would probably pay the
Code Enforcement Officer's pay.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis would like to see a program developed
that would inform residents about required permits. Mr. Mas
stated it would require a pamphlet of two to three pages to
explain permits and when they are required. Commissioner Cole-
Dennis replied she doesn't want itemized information, just make
sure residents understand they have to have permits for even
small things, like adding aluminum awnings to their homes.
DISK M5:PCO50989
8
,
PUBLIC ORALS:
None
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION was made to adjourn by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by
Commissioner Willis, and carried unanimously. The meeting
adjourned at 10:12 p.m. .
Donald A. Dove, Chairperson
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Aubrey D. Fenderson, Manager pouglas D. Barnes.
Planning Division . Deputy City Attorney
Disk 5:PCO50989
9