The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal AboutA 1989-03-14 PLANNING COMMISSION �� . �:s" y �. �`• A G E N D A LYNWOOD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - 7:30 P.M. City Hall Council Chambers 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, CA. �, March 14, 1989 " R� �� CIT OF LY� o ��Yy CLERK� MI�IZ � � 1�� pM " � �g Donald A. Dove � Chairperson ��, / . � GJ��t�A'[� ,.. �: / L�/ J1�c� Lena Cole-Dennis Alberto Montoya Penalber Commissioner Vice Chairperson John K. Haynes Roy Pryor Commissioner Commissioner Lucille Kanka David J. Willis, Jr. Commissioner Commissioner STAFF• Vicente L. Mas, Director Art Barfield Community Development Department Planning Associate Aubrey D. Fenderson Andrew B-Pessima Planning Manager Planning Technician C O M M I S S I O N C O U N S E L: Henry S. Barbosa Douglas D. Barnes I City Attorney Deputy City Attorney • I i DISK 45:AGENCOVR I I March 14, 1989 OPENING CEREMONIES A. Call meeting to order. B. Flag Salute. C. Roll Call of Commissioners. D. Certification of Agenda posting. E. Approval of Minutes of January 10, and February 14, 1989 Planning Commission meetings. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: 1. Si n Ordinance Amendment Case No. 88100 City Wide Comments• � The staff is proposing to amend Chapter 25, the official Zoning and Sign Ordinance with respect to controlling construction of freestanding pole signs city wide. I Recommended Action: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2254. A. Finding that Sign Ordinance Amendment Case No. 88100, will I not have a significant effect on the environment and certify the Negative Declaration as adequate. B. Recommend that the City Council approve the findings in I Resolution No. 2254, waive the reading and introduce the I proposed ordinance. i I 2. Zonin Ordinance Amendment Case No. 1 � City Wide Comments• I The Staff is proposing to Amend Chapter 25, the official Zoning Ordinance with respect to parking standards city wide. Recommended Action: I Staff respectfully requests, that, after consideration, the Planning Commission continue Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case I No. 1 to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission on April 11,1989. DISK 7:AGENDA 1 � ' NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS: 3. Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case No. 2 City Wide Comments The Staff is proposing to Amend Chapter 25, the official Zoning Ordinance with respect to property maintainance standards city wide. Recommended Action Staff respectfully requests, that after consideration, the Planning Commission continue Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case No. 2 to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission on April 11, 1989. , 4. Modification to Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 85075 (CUP 1) 11333 Wright Rd., Lynwood, (Jose L. Lopez) Comment The applicant is requesting a modification of Conditional Use Permit Case No. 85075 in order to construct one (1) two bedroom apartment unit at the rear of an existinq triplex, in the R-3 zone. I Recommended Action: Staff respectfully requests, that after consideration, the Planning Commission continue the modification of Conditional Use Permit Case No. 85075 to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission on April 11, 1989. 5. Conditional Use Permit Case No. 5 12430 Harris Ave., Lynwood (Sergio Lopez) Comment The applicant is proposing to develop four (4) apartment units with three (3) attached and one (1) detached two (2) car garages in the R-2 zone. Recommended Action: Staff respectfully requests, that after consideration, the i Planning Commission continue Conditional Use Permit No. 5, to I the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission on April I 11, 1989. 6. Conditionai Use Permit-Case No. 6 3620 Carlin Avenue (Emigdio Carillio) Comment The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit develop to a two story, four (4) bedroom house in the R-2 zone. Recommended Action Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the I Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2260: A. The project is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended by Section 15061 b(3). DISK 7:AGENDA � I � 2 , B. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 6, subject to the stated �n�ditions and requirements. 7. Conditional Use Permit Case No. 7 3592 Los Flores Boulevard (Marcos and Guadalupe Arellano) , Comment The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop a two story, two (2) bedroom detached - dwelling unit in the R-3 zone. Recommended Action Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the , . Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2266: A. The project;is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3). . B. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 7, subject to the . stated conditions and requirements. 8. Conditional Use Permit Case No. 8 10404 Long Beach Boulevard (Yi Chin Su) , Comment , The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit in order to sell beer and wine at a convienence store in the C-3 zone. Recommended Action Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission concur with staff's recommendation: A. Finding that Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 8 does not comply with the provisions. B. Denying Conditional Use Permit No. 8, as it will adversely affect the city's General Plan. 9. Variance Case No. 1 10992 Pine Avenue (Lawrence R. and Brenda J. Bible) � Comment The applicants are requesting a Variance for a five (5') foot high wrought iron fence along the front yard setback of their property in the R-1 zone. Recommended Action Staff. respectfully request that after consideration the Planning Commission concur with staff's recommendation: A. Findinq that a hardship has not been established that would require a Variance for Case No. 1 as determined by Section 25-26 of the City of Lynwood Zoning Code. B. Finding that the applicants/property owners will not be deprived of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same vicinity if the recommendation of denial is upheld. DISK 7:AGENDA ' 3 10. Variance Case No. 2 10971 San Vicente Avenue (Ceneyda Reyes) �. Comment � The applicant is requesting a Variance in order to provide only three (3) attached one-car garages to serve three residential units in the R-3 zone. Recommended Action Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the -. Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2267 A. Finding that Variance Case No. 2 will not have a significant effect on the environment and certify the Negative Declaration as adequate. B. Approving Variance No. 2 subject to the standard conditions and requirements. 11. Tentative Parcel Map (Na. 20792)Case No. TPM 3 4440 Olanda Avenue (Nathaniel Roberson) Comment The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Parcel • Map (No. 20792) in order to consolidate one and three quarters of parcels into a single parcel in the R-3 zone. Recommended Action A. Finding that Tentative Parcel Map No,. 20792 Case No. 3 will not have a siqnificant effect on the environment and certify the Negative Declaration as adequate. B,. Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 3, subject to the I stated conditions and requirements. 12. Tentative Parcel Map (No. 20790) Case No. TPM 4 Northeast corner of Bullis Road and Century Boulevard Comment The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Parcel Map (No. 20790) in order to consolidate five parcels and a „ portion of another into a single parcel. Recommended Action Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2270.. A. Finding that Tentative Parcel Map No. 20790 Case No. 4 will not have a significant effect on the environment and is therefore exempt. B. Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 4, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. DISK 7:AGENDA 4 i , REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS STAFF COMMENTS COhID1ISSION ORALS Discussion of rules on excused absences for Planning Commission members. PUBLIC ORALS � ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission on April 11, 1989, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall Chambers, 11330 I Bullis Road, Lynwood, California. I � I I Disk 7:AGEMDA I � I � � I i 5 i t MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING -� PLANNING COMNIISSION CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1989 ° OPENING CEREMONIES A. Call to Order The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood was called to order by Vice-Chairperson Penalber on the above captioned date at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California 90262. � � g. Pledge of Allegiance � Commissioner Pryor led the Pledge of Allegiance. 4 �: C. Roll Call of Commissioners , Vice-Chairperson Penalber requested the roll call, and Planning Manager Fenderson complied. Present: Commissioner Lena Cole-Dennis Commissioner Alberto M. Penalber Commissioner Roy Pryor Commissioner David J. Willis, Jr. ' Mr. Fenderson stated Commissioner Haynes requested an excused absence because there_ is illness in his family, and Commissioner pove requested an excused absence because he has the flu. MOTION by Commissnioner Penalber, SECONDED by � Commissioner Willis, to grant Commissioners Dove, Kanka and Haynes excused absences. MOTION carried unanimously. Also present: Dougles Barnes, Deputy City Attorney Aubrey Fenderson, Planning Manager � Arthur Barfield, Planning Associate ' Andrew B-Pessima, Planning Technician James Devore, Associate Engineer Joy Valentine, Minutes Clerk Approximately ten people were in the audience. i D. Certification of Agenda Posting Mr. Fenderson stated that, per the Brown Act, the agenda had .. • been duly posted. , E. Approval of Minutes Mr. Fenderson stated that Item No. 4 of the Agenda had been inadvertently omitted. Item No. 4 wi11 be added and the minutes of January 10, 1989 will be presented to the Planninq Commission at their.regularly scheduled meeting on March 14, 1989. . MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner Willis, to continue, for correction, the minutes of January 10, 1989 to the regularly scheduled meeting on March 14, 1989. MOTION carried by the followinq vote: AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Penalber, Pryor, Willis NOES: None � i ABSENT: Commissioners Dove, Haynes, Kanka ABSTAIN: None DISK MINS4:MINFEBI4 I i 1 . ! ' Commissioner Cole-Dennis stated her displeasure because the Commissioners' failed to grant her an excused absence at the January 11, 1989 meeting, although she called staff and said she . would be out of town on business. She stated she must be out of town sometimes on business. Mr. Barnes s,ici c7ommissioner Cole- Dennis discussed the requirement for three consecutive unexcused absences before a Commissioner can be dismissed. Mr. Barnes stated that if no motion is made to grant an excused absence, - that constitutes an unexcused absence. Mr. Barnes further stated that it would be appropriate to agendize what would constitute an excused absence. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Sian Ordinance Amendment- Case No. 88100 Citywide Staff proposes to amend Chapter 25, official Zoning and Sign Ordinance, to control construction of free standing pole signs Citywide. This matter was continued from the January 10, 1988, Planning Commission meeting to allow staff more time for evaluation. Since staff is still reviewing and developing the amendment and therefore requested another continuance to the March 14, 1989, Planning Commission meeting. Vice-Chairperson Penalber opened the Public Hearing. There being no one wishing to speak either in favor or in opposition, he closed the Public Hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Cole-Dennis to continue Case No. 88100 to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission on March 14, 1989, SECONDED by Commissioner I Pryor. ' I MOTION carried by the following vote: � AYES: Commisioner Cole-Dennis, Penalber, Pryor, I Willis NOES: None , � ABSENT: Commissioners Dove, Haynes, Kanka i ABSTAIN: None I 2. Zoning Ordinance Amendment- Case No. 1 I Citywide Staff is proposing to amend Chapter 25, the official zoning ordinance, with respect to parking standards Citywide. I Due to the illness of a number of staff inembers and j other City Council priorities, Mr. Fenderson requested � that this item be continued to the Planning � Commission's regularly scheduled meeting of March 14, i 1989. I Vice-Chairperson Penalber opened the Public Hearing. There being no one wishing to speak in favor or in opposition, the Public Hearing was closed. I DISK MIN54:MINFEBI4 I � 2 � I MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED m,y Commissioner Cole-Dennis, to continue Zoning Ordinaa�e Amendment - Case No. 1 to the next regularly schedul�d meeting of the Planning Commission on March 14-, 198� MOTION carried by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Penalber, Pryor, Willis NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Dove, Haynes, Kanka ABSTAIN: None 3. Zonina Ordinance Amendment - Cas� No. 2 Citywide Staff proposes to amend Chapter 25, the official zoning ordinance, with respect to property maintenance standards Citywide. Due to the illness of a number of staff inembers and other City Council priorities, Mr. Fenderson requested that this item k.+�: continued to the Planning Commission's regularly scheduled meeting of March 14, 1989. Vice-Chairperson Penalber Dpened the Public Hearing. there being no Dne wishing t�c> speak in favor or in I opposition, the Public Hearing was closed. ' MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commisioner Cole-Dennis, to continue Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Case No. 2 to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Coimnission on March 14, 1989. MOTION carried by the following vote: � i AYES: Commisioners Cole-Dennis, Penalber, Pryor, i Willis � i NOES: None ' � i ABSENT: Commisioners Dove, Haynes, Kanka � I ABSTAIN: None � 4. Variance - Case i�o. 88097 � 3965 Platt Avenue (Philip Wilf, Jr.) i i Applicant requests a variance for a 57-1/2" high f concrete block and decorative wrought iron fence along � the front yard setback of his property in the R-1 zone, thus exceeding the legal limit of 48" by 9-1/2". Mr. Barfield distributed a list of six�conditions that I must be met in order to grant rhe requested variance. I Mr. Barfield stated a visual study had been conducted of the fences in t.he 3�a0 block of Platt Avenue and a search had been made to determine which fences were � legal�y installed. I At its regular meeting of February 2, 1989, the Site � Plan Review Committee denied the proposed project. � I DISKMINS4:MINFEBI4 � � I � I 3 i I � � i I Vice-Chairperson Penalber opened the Public Hearing and Philip Wilf, Jr., 3965 Platt Avenue, Lynwood, rose to state his desire to keep his fence as protection for his wife and containment of his two dogs. He stated he � had no reason to believe anything was wrong until he received a notice in the mai2 from Code Enforcement. He distributed pictures to the Commissioners that, in , his opinion, showed that his fence is lower than the fences of his neighbors. - Comanissioner Pryor asked Mr. Wilf if he hired a licensed contractor and if he knew there is a fence ordinance in the City of Lynwood. Mr. Wilf replied that he thought his contractor was licensed and he didn't know anything about the fence ordinance. Vice-Chairperson Penalber asked if anyone was present wishing to speak in favor or in opposition to the variance, there being no one, he closed the Public Hearing,. Commissioner Pryor stated the property owner is responsible for whatever is on his property. It is unfortunate that this happened, but the City has codes which should be followed, he said. Mr. Fenderson stated that 3980 Platt Avenue has a 5' fence under a zoning ordinance adjustment. He also stated that zoning ordinance adjustments are no lonqer allowed for front yard fencing. Commissioner Willis asked what brought the offending fence to staff's attention and Mr. Barfield replied that the occupant was cited by Code Enforcement , officers. Vice-Chairperson Penalber asked Mr. Wilf if he is willing to pay for the permit application and Mr. Wilf replied in the affirmative. Mr. Fenderson said Mr. Wilf could cut down the metal sections and reinstall.them. Commissioner Pryor asked Mr. Barnes if all non- ` conforming fence owners could be required to remove or cut down other fences. He wanted to know if this case could be held in abeyance until the applicant's neighbors are in compliance. Mr. Barnes stated further action could be delayed for . one year. He suggested the Commission could deny the variance and instruct Code Enforcement not to enforce the code at this particular address until the rest of the neighborhood is also enforced. MOTION by Commissioner Cole-Dennis, SECONDED by Commissioner Willis, to deny Variance 88097. MOTION carried by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Penalber, Pryor, Willis � NOES: None � ABSENT: Commissioners Dove, Haynes, Kanka � ABSTAIN: None , DISK MINS4:MINFEBI4 � � I , 4 � I MOTION by Commissioner Cole-Dennis, SECONDED by Commissioner Pryor, to direct Code Enforcement to take no action until Code compliance has been met in the surrounding area of 3965 Platt Avenue. , AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Penalber, Pryor, Willis . NOES: None . ABSENT: Commissioners Dove, Aaynes, Kanka AB5TAIN: None 5. Modification to Conditional Use Permit - Case tia. 85075 (CUP 1) 11333 Wright Road (Jose L, Lopez} Applicant requests a modification of Conditional Use Permit Case No. 85075 in order to construct one two-bedroom apartment unit at the rear of an existinq triplex. Mr. B-Pessima stated that the existing structures are built - without the provision of usable open space. Although approximateZy 69� of the property is devoted to open space, 34$ is paved for vehicular accessibility with 30� for landscaping and, apart from the landscaped area in the front yard setback, the other landscaped areas are scattered patches on the property that are of. no real significance. Vice-Chairperson Penalber opened the Public Hearing and Jose Luis Lopez rose, along with his interpreter, William Flores, - 2513-1/2 California Street, Huntington Park.' Mr. Flores stated that Mr. Lopez wants permission to build one mbre unit. Mr. Fenderson stated that Mr. Lopez requested a CUP in 1985 for three units and was given permission for two, not three. Mr. Fenderson further stated that staff is still of the opinion that two units is sufficient because some usable open space should be kept on the property. Commissioner willis discussed the open spaces now available with the applicant. Mr. Flores asked if Mr. Lopez could build on top of the existing units. Mr. Barnes statec3 the Commission could consider only the plans already presented but that Mr. Lopez could return at another time with plans for building on top of the present units. Vice-Chairperson Penalber asked if anyone was present wishing to speak in favor or in opposition to the proposal. There being no one, he closed the Public Hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Cole-Dennis, SECONDED by Commissioner Pryor, to continue Modification to Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 85075 to the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission on March 14, 1989. MOTION carried by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Penalber, Pryor, Willis NOES: None , ABSENT: Commissioners Dove, Haynes, Kanka ABSTAIN: None � DISKMIN4:MINFEBI4 i � � : 5 i I I 6. Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 1 9910 Long Beach Boulevard (Farrokh Keyvan) Applicant requests a Tentative Parcel Map (No. 20595) to consolidate three existing parcels into one parcel in order to • build a mini-shopping center at 9910 Long Beach Boulevard. Farrokh Keyvan, 10537 Wilkins, Los Angeles, 90024, and Mike ' Valverez, 199 S. Montevista, Suite 4, San Dimas, came to the podium. A discussion between the two applicants and - Commissioners followed, until Mr. Barnes reminded all that " approval of the building was not required at this time, only approval of the combination of the three parcels into one large parcel should be under discussion at this time. Vice=Chairperson Penalber asked if anyone was present to speak in favor or in opposition to the proposal. There being no one, the Public Hearing was closed. Vice-Chairperson Penalber stated he had looked at the site, and there is a vacant gas station and across the street are a liquor store and operating gas station. He stated this area Ys now a problem for the Sheriff's Department, even South Gate officers have problems in that area. He asked if people will get mugged if they step out of their car, and is the City of Lynwood ready to tackle this problem? Commissioner Pryor stated that the Commission was only being asked to approve the parcel map at this time. Commissioner Cole-Dennis aqreed with the Commissioner Pryor that the parcel map was at this time the only thing under discussion. Mr. , Fenderson stated the Site Plan Review Committee has approved the Tentative Parcel Map._ MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner Cole- Dennis, to adopt Resolution No. 2258, "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 20595 TO COMBINE PORTIONS OF LOTS 8 AND 9 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF ESTATE OF ROBERT TWEEDY, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 83 PAGES 13 AND 14 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORD LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CONII�40NLY KNOWN AS 9910 LONG BEACH BLVD., LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, finding that Tentative Parcel Map No. 20595 will not have a significant effect on the environment and certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. MOTION carried by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Penalber, Pryor, Willis NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Dove, Haynes, Kanka ABSTAIN: None 7. Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 2 � 11140 and 11146 Duncan Avenue (Norman Yang) Applicant requests a Tentative Parcel Map in order to consolidate two parcels and build ten townhouse apartments. DISK MIN54:P4INFEBI4 6 ' i , i Vice-Chairperson Penalber opened the Public Hearing and Norman Yang, 7150 Silver Spurs, Suite 210, Rolling Hills, 90274, rose � to discuss his proposed ten townhouse apartments, which will be five duplexes with more than the required open space, including a playground for children. The duplexes will have • roofs of fiberglass shingles, white trim around the windows and the five buildings will be covered in three different colors of stucco so as to look like a little village. Mr. Barnes reminded the Commissioners that only Tentative ' Parcel Map approval was required on this item. Commissioner Pryor asked Mr. Yang how long the owner has owned. the property and Mr. Yanq replied that escrow had just closed a month ago. Vice-Chairperson Penalber asked if anyone was present wishing to speak in favor or in opposition to the proposal. There being no one, he closed the Public Hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner Willis, to adopt Resolution No. 2260, �"A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMSSSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOB APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 20704 TO COMBINE A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 8 AND 9 BLOCK "A" TRACT NO. 10978, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 191, PAGE 6 OF THE COUNTY RECORDED OF THE COIJNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, KNOWN AS 11140 AND 11146 DUNCAN AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA," finding that Tentative Parcel Map No. 20704, Case No. 2, will not have a significant effect on the environment, certifying the Neqative Declaration as adequate, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Penalber, Pryor, Willis NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Dove, Haynes, Kanka ABSTAIN: None 8. Conditional Use Permit - No. 4 11140 and 11146 Duncan Avenue (Norman Yang) Applicant requests approval to develop ten three-bedroom, � , two-story townhouse apartments in the R-3 zone. I Vice-Chairperson Penalber opened the Public Hearing and Norman Yang, 7150 Silver Spurs, Suite 210, Rolling Hills, 90274, rose to discuss his proposed ten townhouse apartment, which will be five duplexes with more than the required open space, including a playground for children. Each will have 2-1/2 baths, 1300 sq. ft. of living space and there will be six visitor parking spaces although only one is required by the City. the duplexes will have roofs of fiberglass shingles, white trim around the windows and the five buildings will be covered in three different colors of stucco so as to look like a little village. Mr. Yang stated he had not seen all the reguirements and Mr. Fenderson stated that he must sign a statement of acceptance of all conditions before the permit will be approved. � ( DISK MINS4:MINFEBI4 I I � I 7 I Commissioner Willis wanted to be sure the property, which is now in a deplorable condition, will be cleaned up. ' Commissioners Willis and Penalber discussed the possibility that someone might be living there since both had seen two cars parked there. Mr. Yang stated no one is living there and � Commissioner Pryor said the two cars belong to a neighbor who parks them there. , There being no one wishing to speak either in favor or in opposition to the praposaZ, Vice-Chairperson Penalber closed ' the Public Hearing. Commissioner Cole-Dennis stated her approval of the extra parking spaces, play area and separate buildings. Mr. Fenderson stated that extensive reviews have been held on the proposal during the last month. He said staff really considers it a good proposed development. ` MOTTON by Commissionar Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner Cole- Dennis, to approve Resolution No. 2260, "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CQMMISSI�N OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) NO. 4 TO CONSTRUCT TEN (10) THREE BEDROOM, TWO-STORY TOWNHOUSE APARTMENTS IN THE R-3 (MULTIPLE- FAMILY) RESIDENTIAL ZONE, 11140 AND 11146 DUNCAN AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, 90262," finding there will not be a significant effect on the environment, and certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate, subject to the stated conditions and requirements_ - 9. Conditional Use Permit No. 5 12430 Harris Avenue (Sergio Lopez) Applicant. proposes to develop four apartment units with three attached and one detached two-car garages in the R-2 zone. Vice-Chairperson Penalber opened the Public Hearing and Sergio � Lopez, 8409 Florence Avenue, 5uite 302, Downey, 90241, rose to state his opinion that the units would be beneficial to the � City of Lynwood. Mr. B-Pessima stated that another man had objected to the , proposed Conditional Use Permit and claimed ownership of the property. He further stated that the applicant has not proved � his ownership. Both Mr. Fenderson and Mr. B-Pessima stated that staff, although originally recommending approval, is now of the opinion that this matter should be continued to the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission on March 14, 1989, to allow the City enough time to ascertain ownership of the property. , Vice-Chairperson Penalber stated his opinion that if staff feels that the Planning Commission shouldn't act, then the matter should be continued to the March 14, 1989 meeting. Mr. Barnes stated the C.U.P. would go with the property if ' approved by the Planning Commission, but he would feel better if the proven owner were heard on the issue. There being no one wishing to speak in favor or in opposition to the proposal, Vice-Chairperson Penalber closed the Public � Hearinq. I ' I i I . � DISK MINS4:MINFEBI4' i MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner Willis, I I . g � MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner Willis, to continue Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 5 to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission on March 14, 1989. � M�TI4h ca=�ied �y the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Penalber, Pryor, � Willis . NOES: None ' ABSENT: Commissioners Dove, Haynes, Kanka ABSTAIN: None 10. Annual Review and Report on the Lynwood General Plan Staff submittal of the Annual Report of the Lynwood General Plan for review, comment and admission to Lynwood City Council. Mr. Fenderson.discussed the proposals previously approved by the Planning Commission: 1. General Plan Amendment 3600 and 3700 blocks of Platt Avenue from Single Family to Townhouse Cluster Housing. 2. General Plan Amendment 4300 block of the north side of Carlin Avenue from Townhouse and Cluster Housing to Mu1ti-Family. 3. General Plan Amendment 3200 block of Flower Street and the north side of Fernwood Avenue from Single Family to Townhouse and Cluster Housing. 4. Zone Change 11000 and 1200 blocks of Wilson Avenue from Multi-Family - to Two-Family Residential. 5. Zone Change 3630 E. Imperial from Heavy Commercial to Hospital- Medical-Dental zone. Mr. Fenderson further discussed zoning and the subdivision ordinances as tools for implementing the General Plan. MOTION by Commissioner Cole-Dennis, SECONDED by Commissioner Pryor, to recommend that the City Council review and file the report. MOTION carried by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Penalber, Pryor, Willis NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Dove, Aaynes, Kanka ABSTAIN: None .__ _.�.-._REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS: STAFF COMMEI3TS: COMMISI�N ORAI�S: DISK MIN4:MINFE814 9 i ' . PUBLIC ORALS: ' ADJOURNMENT: MOTION was made to adjourn by Commissioner , SECONDED by Commissioner , and carried unanimously. The ' meeting adjourned at 10:20 p.m. ' APPROVED AS WRITTEN this day of , 1988. . Donald D. Dove, Chairperson ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Aubrey D. Fenderson, Manager pouglas D. Barnes , Planning Department Deputy City Attorney DISK MIN4:FEB14 10 �� DATE: March 14, 1989 (' � ^,' �: �; i '_ ;;' � :I A� ��_::�:�. ;, ��,� i:�.� TO: PLANNING COMMISSION r C r P M `. VfIVL E��Y�. vlv� ' FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: Sign Ordinance Amendment Case No. 88100 Regulating • Freestandinq Pole Sians City -Wide PROPOSAL: The staff is proposinq to Amend Chapter 25, the official zoning and si.gn ordinance with respect to controlling construction of freestanding siqns city-wide. HACKGROUND: In recent months, commercial development in the City of Lynwood has triggered an increase in the number of freestandinq signs in the City. This increase can create visual clutter, decreasing the attractiveness of the City's commercial areas. At its regularly scheduled meeting of December 20, 1988, the City Council adopted an urgency ordinance, establishing a moratorium on the construction, erection and installation of freestanding signs. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Under present conditions and provisions in the city's sign ordinance, staff believes the city will experience a proliferation of freestanding signs as witnessed by the current commercial/manufacturing development trends. The proliferation of freestanding signs is an area which needs immediate regulatory attention to avoid further visual pollution and blight. ' Staff has developed an ordinance amendment which will correct the problem and treat the entire business community in a fair and equitable manner. The proposed amendment eliminates any new construction of on and off-premises pole signs in the city's commercial and manufacturing zones. Existing on and off-premises i pole signs will become legal non-conforming structures and will � not be allowed to expand or be replaced. These signs will be � eliminated through attrition as California State Planning law, no ! longer allows abatement periods and, instead, requires that � payment for removal of such signs be based on permit valuation. i Staff proposes to restrict freestanding signs to "monument" signs only. These type of signs if properly regulated are less undesirable than pole signs by blending with the character of the development where they are located. After reviewing development standards for the construction of monument signs of five (5) surveyed cities, (see attachment), staff has developed an ordinance for the construction of said signs in association with the character and size of development. The proposed amendment was published in the Lynwood Press on � December 20, 1988, and staff has not received any comments as of the date of this report. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Staff has found that no sulistantial environmental impact will result from the project; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared and is on file in the City Clerk's office and the I Community Development Department. � � DISK 44:SOA88100 ; I I � I ( " RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the ' Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2254 A. Finding that Sign Ordinance Amendment Case No. 88100, will not have a significant effect on the environment and certify the Negative Declaration as adequate. " B. Recommend that the City Council approve the findings in Resolution No. 2254 waive the reading and introduce the proposed ordinance. Attachments: 1. Survey of Cities 2. Resolution No. 2254 3. Proposed Ordinance DISK 44:SOA88100 I � � I � � � I I I � I I i - - FREE STANDING MONOMENT SIGN ' — ---_�.--------°---__........_....__.... ...---- .--... ,_._.. . . .. ............ _:._..MAXIMUM PERMITTED ZONE ; i I - - _ _ _ _..----- --- -- y �.__ �..__._.�__ I °-----�---- �_.r. i � � I _.�..-- CITY � i � RMIT ! ( AREA I HEIGHT � DESIGN REQUIREMENTS � 1�,.R 2�R-3 CB1 C2-2Ai C3 M REQUIRID; .�.—.�_._� -----__--- -..._ ._ _ ..... . :.. . . . . __.._ __...... ,.. _ _ ... _... ._I-- i i 20sq.ft. �6' fcgs��q/ � 21sq.ft, in size. B�Ltanrrkt�� : i i i � i but us�tlly;,,i.�,,;al 9�; siC� rr,t tb ameEd 12ft. eit}� �� ' ` I � lt d� °' with 95,OOLbq.ft. flat. gcp ba9e rr.t tr� � 1ft. �a.e fini�r�3 � � X �I j X i YFS �� I 6' tr{� o� sgn �. �S5g� ms�t be at l,�st 8' fxnn the� � � i X X' X � , ' � C E R R I T O S i �" t s i c� a l k. �� u x 3 �� b� s t � f f l u t a t y i � ------- -----._._--- -- ---- + la�st s�at.bb_sicy�.ata3.... _.-.. ' _ . . . ! + � f -- --_., .__ , . :, + ... ; _._ . - -- --- i_� ' i � I ; i 1�g].£t. Q' 6 � O1fIlt3'- 150 Of 5� �ZC71�d�.' �ttYgji �, tPdc bE.#YE91� � . I � � � rot rtcae tl�m� cial a¢td 8' frrc 1 5 �-� ��. �da�aird rnt � e�eacl 1/3 c¢ c�ei i I I V 75$ C� 1ilmr. �• i� aT� rtls�t be la�, Tb be tr*ally � X � X X�' X X i y� � � f� gcarrl I i ir�rectly illurdrstEd. : � � DOWNEY i� i ` ; � � , , i ; , � _ . . . ,..__. _.. _... __ ..._....---_.____— ---_- -------- i 15s�.ft. � 6' but varies !��-7.ft. �acl mt � ea¢�a9 100sq.ft. fI�,ecer, ; ! � with aTe arl ty�; � is rnt �ecifisi � irng as it d�e; rtt : ; ! i + I c� �se. �� 100£t. Q�r�l lit �d ar�d X i X X X ! X i YFS ! � �; , � t _ , fca' diLect � irrlixact illumratirn. _ PARAMOUNT I, � ; , --- _ ..._ . _ . . , . { _ � ._ . _ .. . . _ . .. . _ . . _ .. . . _ _.. . . .__... . f . I - - . . � __ ._ _ .. - --- . .. __ _ .. . . .... .. � , . - -� - -, ..(... I • i 1�2' c� fln�'� ' Nlst be 15'X75' nmcimm kut imally allr7t+ed is �: � f I ax� ta 1 � _ 7'XI O' . Mat be pPm�t1Y att�d�l. I�rl- ; X '• X X X X j YES i 7 iT+� sq.ft.i �°4 ��✓ir�d in mc� : it is tr� the satis- ;' , � � ��, � °' factirn of � c¢ �minity � �. ; ; ` to rtmdmm of; ;� i] lu�dnatim. TORRANCE j 2 � . �. � C � ; , � ; i Y�.ft.---�----___._ �.._ ... 70ft...s�adc 1 ,._ __ --- _..__. .._... —_ . _ . _.....�-- � �-... ;. ft. in ' ; 150ft. of sbreet 'iec , t : --- -'� � � ert in M�. ;� �• �. g.ga at l�t sft. irs� � � ' i � � ; ;�ty lirn. Mst 1� in 1� � as X ; � ; YES I�� ; �� g�. N�iy12 a�ly dis�tly �' ;rr1;�w�Fty j R X. X X ; � 1M ane. ; ' ill,mirnfrr7 1 si9n �s' Str�t &r ' � i Ntndmm 15�j! � ant�ial � ��Px-r,,.;.� � ; � SOUTH GATE �� I � - `- ; ._w�-- _-.._. _...__ .... _. _.i. _ � _ __ . ...i - , . ._.. __ _._..._..._ ... _. :. � , • _. _ _. , � : ---�---,__...�.__ ! i f � � � i . t ;, ------- --- ----- -- --- --- , , ' f RESOLUTION NO. 2254 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF , THE CITY OF LYNWOOD RECONII'�IENDING CITY COUNCIL ` ADOPTION OF AN AMEPIDMENT TO SECTION 25-33 (5), DELETION OF 25-33 f6) ABCD AND ADDITION OF SECTIdN 25-33-5.5 OF THE LYNWOOD 1 MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO REGULATING FREESTANDING SIGNS CITY WIDE. WHEREAS,. the. Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, did, pursuant to law, conduct a public hearing on a proposed amendment to the Lynwood Municipal Code with respect to the above subject; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that no substantial environmental impact will result from the proposed amendment; and therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared and i - on file in the Community Development Department and the office of the City Clerk. Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The proposed amendment will be consistent with the objectives and the development policies of the City of Lynwood. . � B. The proposed amendment will not unreasonably constrain the � use of property by landowners and developers. � C. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the General Plan. -. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of.Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby recommends City Council adoption of the proposed amendment. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of March, 1989, by members of - the Planning Commission voting as follows: = AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Donald Dove, Chairman I .--. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: � Vicente L. Mas, Directar Henry 5. Barbosa I Community Development Dept. General Counsel I I DISK 44:RES02254 � ` ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE + CITY OF LYNWOOD AMENDING CHAPTER 25, THE OFFICIAL ZONING ORDINANCE, OF THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT TO REGULATING FREESTANDING SIGNS CITY WIDE , THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 25, Section 25-33.2C�)BD relating to - off-premises freestanding signs shall be amended, Section 25- 33.22 (6) ABCD relating to on Premises Freestanding Signs shall be deleted in its entirety. While Section 25-33.(5.5) Monument or Ground Signs is hereby added to Chapter 25. (5) Off-Premises Freestanding Sign An off-premises freestanding sign is recognized as a legitimate sign form and may only be located along the perimeter of a freeway, subject to the following restrictions: �� (a) Area An off-premises freestanding sign's area shall not exceed three hundred (300) square feet, except that a maximum area of seven-hundred (700) square feet shall be allowed where ' the property on which the siqn is placed is located within three-hundred (300) feet of a freeway as defined by Section 25-33.1 of the Lynwood Code. (b) Hei ht An off-premises freestanding sign's height shall not exceed . thirty-five (35) feet. (c) Clearance An off-premises freestanding sign shall have a minimum clearance of sixteen (16) feet between the sign's display surface and the ground at the sign's base. (d) Location ' Any o'ff-premises freestanding sign shall not be located within the setback applicable to structures within the zone , in which the sign is to be located. In addition, an off- premises freestanding sign placed in a private property shall not (I) encroach upon or over a public right-of-way nor (II) be located within one hundred (100) feet of any residential zone, or commercial zone unless it is in full compliance with this section,(III) no such sign shall be permitted within five-hundred (500) feet of any other such sign on either side of the same street. Signs on the corner parcel of any intersection shall be treated as though they were on each street for purposes of this paragraph. (e) Illumination Only indirect illumination of an off-premises sign's face shall be permitted. All service wiring shall be underground. � DISK 44:ORDINANC 1 (f} Screening _ mhe rear portion of any single face or "V" type off- premises freestanding sign shall be screened from view of any public right-of-way or residential district, and such screening shall cover all of the sign's structural members, . excluding pole supports. (g) Development Standards Any off-premises freestanding sign shall also comply with any other development standards imposed upon the parcel under any provision of this Chapter relating to site plan review or conditional use permit approva L (5.5) Monument or Ground Signs , Definition: Monument or ground sign- Sign erected or supported by a pedestal base, placed within a planter, detached from the building(s) to identify or advertise a business (not service or product). standards- Location• 1. Minimum of 150 feet of street frontage required. 2. A minimum setback of 5 feet from the street right-of-way. 3. Permitted in all commercial and manufacturing zones. Size: Commercial Zones- The sign area shall have a maximum of 25 square feet per side. Manufacturing Zones- The sign area shall have a maximum of 25 square feet per side. Additional sign area may be approved for a commercial or industrial center, if approved as part of a site plan by the City's Site Plan Review Committee. Under no circumstance shall any sign exceed ten (TO) feet in height or 100 sq. (per side) ft. in sign area. Heiqht• Commercial Zones- Maximum height shall not exceed six (6) feet above finished grade. Manufacturing Zones- Maximum height shall not exceed eight (8) feet above finished grade. Additional sign heiqht may be approved for a commercial or industrial center, if approved as part of a site plan by the City's Site Plan Review Committee. Under no circumstance shall any sign exceed - ten (1-0) feet in height or 100 sq.ft. (per side) in sign area. DISK 44:ORDINANC 2 ,. Limitations• ' All signs shall be erected inside a landscaped area or planter with minimum area equal to the total area of the monument sign. Freestanding Monument or Ground Signs may only be directly or indirectly illuminated and only.one such sign per parcel is _ permitted. The informatian content on the sign shall be limited to letters designating the store name, store address, or establisfied trade logo as set forth-in the business license application. No sign shall advertise or display the name, brand name, or manufacturer's name of any product, article, or service unless these names are included in the name identifying the business. Section 2. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance, or the application thereof to any person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to other persons or places. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof,.irrespective of the fact that"any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions, or the application thereof to any person or place, be declared invalid or unconstitutional. First read at regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the day of , 1989, and finally adopted and ordered published at a meeting of said Council held on the day of , ,. 1989, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: EVELYN WELLS, Mayor ATTEST: Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk , APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: II Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa Community Development Department General Counsel I I DISK 44:ORDINANC 3 I I ;� ;�i A ' �- ' '`-` a ;';� 1;1 C�� ,} r,-� DATE: March 14, 1989 � �=« �� 3 .�r�pj, �1. �. � TO: PLANNING COMMISSION �� ,,; i ZOA GASE NCl I �' ;; FROM: Vicente L Mas, Director :� Community Development Department :� ::.� �; SUBJECT: Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case No. 1, . `�; Parking Standards, City Wide ,ia ::� '== PROPOSAL: �? The staff is proposing to Amend Chapter 25, the official Zoning Ordinance with respect to parking standards city wide. FACTS Increased parking on commercial streets, creates more traffic congestion in many commercial zones throughtout the city, and is primarily due to inadequate parking provided on existing developed commercial/manufacturing lots. Staff believes that much of the increased on-street parking is attributable to inadequate parking standards in the City of Lynwood Zoning Ordinance. Staff recommends that the City re-established quantitative parking requirements and eventually parking design and layout guideTines to remedy the deficiencies in off-street parking. The establishment off-street parking of adequate commercial/manufacturinq zones is necessary to protect the public _ health, safety, convenience and public welfare. This item is continued from the Planning Commission's regularly scheduled meeting of February 14, 1989. RECOMMENDATIONS The staff has still not come to a final draft on the proposed parking ordinance and is therefore requesting that the Planning Commission continue this item to the regularly sheduled meeting i _ of April 11, 1989. i I DISK 41:ZOA2 I � ;:� :� I . ( a ;;, @r � i � � )' ' ){. � r.. �i � �� ' t�11�: , ; � 9.., ��} i DATEc March 14, 1989 �`� ! � —" „� i, t „ -Z � C�,SE NO. Z� � 1 q � — TO: PLANNING COMMISSION �" FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director Community Development Department . SUBJECT: Zoninct Ordinance Amendment Case No. 2 Regulating . Proqerty Maintenance City-Wide PROPOSAL: Staff is proposing to amend Chapter 25, the Official Zoning and Sign Ordinance of the City of Lynwood with respect to Nuisance and Property Maintenance. FACTS It has become a matter of great concern regarding the neglect and disrepair of the Housing and Property stock located within the City. Provisions in the Municipal Code do not adequately address these issues. At the moment, Articles ii and III of the City's Nuisance abatement and Property Maintenance overlap to a great extent and should not only be combined but should also deal with specific issues. . This it.em is continued from the Planning Commission's regularly scheduled meeting of February 14, 1989. RECONII�7ENDATIONS The staff has developed and resubmitted the proposed ordinance to the City Attorney's for review and comment. Staff request that this item be continued to the Planning Commission's regularly scheduled meeting of April 11, 1989. DISK 41:88100ZOA I 1 I . .,.. , ... , ... . ., .�... .,. . . . . . , , . . . ... e .. _ - DATE: March 14, 1989 { J � � � � � n' S,�,�� 1 L'�.�1 1 ll� �^� . TO: PLANNING COMMISSION " '� , �� 1�`� P p FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director �� ".. ��:`w+• �� Community Development Department SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit- Case No. 1 • , Applicant: Jose Luis Lopez Proposal:_ The applicant is requesting approval of a modification to Conditional Use Permit .#$5075 in order to build an additional one story two bedroom unit in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone at 11333 Wright Road, Lynwood, CA., 90262. Facts• The project is for an additional one story unit to be added to an existing triplex. The proposed unit will comprise of two bedrooms, one bath, living room, a dining area and a kitchen. For the new addition, one car garage and one open parking space will be provided. In all, eight parking spaces will be provided four of which would be attached one-car garages. Despite meeting the requirements to have four (4) units on the property, the proposal specifically falls short of Section 25-4 (a) 1, 4 and 6 of the City of Lynwood Zoning Code with respect to (a) Lack of usable open space and (b) Overutilization of property. Therefore, staff recommended denial of the project. However, the applicant agreed to re-submit another plan that would address the above findings. This item was continued from the Planning Commission's regularly ' scheduled meeting of February 14, 1989. Recommendation: Since the applicant did not re-submit the said revised plans, Staff , requests that this item be continued to the Planning Commission's regularly scheduled meeting of April 11, 1989 DISK 44:CUPICONT _.L`� j DATE: March 14, 1989 r�'' � `� , .. : . i � ... � 1 i � ��il. � TO: PLANNING COMMISSION (�,� l - � �t( 1'-� < 3 v! i./. G(1 P nfo.�� FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director , ' Community Development Department � _ SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 5 . � ProposaL• The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to build four apartment units in the R-3 (Two-Family Residential) zone at 11004 Harris Avenue, Lynwood, CA. Facts , The project is for three two-story buildings to comprise four (4) two- bedroom apartment units. In all, four two-car garages will be provided and all but`one would be attached. A six (6') foot high block wall will be built on the perimeter of the lot except in the twenty (20') � feet front yard setback. Staff initially recommended approval of the project. . However, a controversy arose between the applicant and an alleged, new owner of the property which was brought to Staff's attention. Staff advised both parties to substantiate their claims to the property by producing documents to that effect. Both parties failed to produce said documents and Staff recommended continuation of the case. This item is ,continued from the Planning Commission's regularly scheduled meeting of February 14, 1989. Recommendation � Since the applicant and the alleged new owner of the property failed to . produce the documents to substantiate ownership, Staff requests that _ this matter be continued to the Planning Commission's regularly scheduled meeting of April 11, 1989. DISK 44:CUP5CONT `t `1 , � �� SERGIO LOPEZ 8409 FLORENCE AVE it202 DOWNEY. CA. 90240 MARCH 8th, 1989 CITY OF LYNWOOD ' -• flTTN: UICENTE �. MHS 11330 BULLIS RU. �YNWOOD, CU. 90262 DEAR MR. MAG: THIS IS TO RELUEST A CONTINUANCY OF THE ' PROYECT AT 12430 HARRIS AVE_ FOR THE NEXT REVIEW BOARD MEETING. DUE TO SOME PROBLEMS THAT WE HflVE WITH TNE PURCHA3E OF THE PROPERTY, WE CANNOT PROVIDE YOU WSTH THE PAPERS THAT YOU , REQUESTED. HOWEVER WE THINK WE CF�N HAVE TNEM IN THE NEXT TWO WEEKS. AS SOON A; I HAVE SOMETHING I WILL GIVE YOU COPIES. SINCERELY, s 3ERGI0 LOP 1 .,. � �: CUP .6 ;� ,��,�. � " DATE: March 14, 1989 q� � � /'i?.:�+ :;'. ¢ + ' : ^ , TO: PLANNING COMMISSION � � ` �`�� . � ��' �' � (` �. Cu ,,., � I FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director � NO, - Community Development Department - . SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -CASE NO. 6 Applicant: Emigdio Carillio PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop a two story, four (4) bedroom house in the R-2 (Two Family Residential) zone at 3620 Carlin Avenue, Lynwood, CA. ' FACTS: l. Source of Authority - Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to build or relocate dwelling units in the R-2 zone. 2. Propertv Location ' The subject property consists of one (1) rectangular lot at the southwest corner of Carlin and Bu11is streets (refer to attached Location Map). 3. Property Size The site is approximately fifty (50') feet wide along Carlin Avenue and 49_90 feet along the rear lot perimeter, and one hundred and thirty six feet (136') feet deep with a area of • approximately 6,800 square feet. 4_ Existing Land Use The property is presently developed with one single family residence and an attached single-car garage. Also, on site is a mobile home trailer. The surrounding land uses are, generally, single-family in character, and as follows: North - Single Family Residential South - Two Family Residential East - Single Family/Multi-Family Residential West - Single Family 5. Land Use Description The General Plan designation for the subject property is Townhouse and Cluster Housing, and the 2oning classification is R-2. The surrounding land use designations are as follows: General Plan Zonin North - Townhouse & Cluster Housing North - R-2 South - Townhouse & Cluster Housing South - R-2 East - Single Family East - R-1 West - Single Family West - R-1 DISK 7:CUP 6 1 ' J ; 6. Project Characteristics The applicant is proposing to �tevelop a two (2) stai�r residential unit, consisting of (4) four bedrooms wi�th an attached three car qarage. Approximately, fifty percent (50�) is proposed for landscaging. The property is aurrently dev,eloped - with a single family dwelling. 7. Site Plan Review On February 22, 1989, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and recommended approval by the Planning Commission, subject to specific conditions. 8. Zonina Enforcement History None of record. 9. Public Response No response as of the writing of this report. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION 1. Consistencv with General Plan _ The property is consistent with the existing zoning classification (R-2) and the General Plan designation (Townhouse and Cluster Housing). Therefore, granting Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 6 will not adversely affect the Lynwood General Plan. 2. Site Suitability The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development relative to density, bulk of the structures, parking, walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. The property is adequately served with the required public utilities and offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessiblity. 3. Compatibility The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of low . and medium density residential developments; therefore, the project will be compatible with developments in the area. 4. Compliance with Development Standards The proposal meets all of the development standards required by the 2oning ordinance with respect to parking; front, side, and rear-yard setbacks; distance between structures; lot coverage; open space and landscaping; building height; unit size and density. The base density within the R-2 zone is 14 units acre and , allows the development of two (2) units on the subject site. DISK 7:CUP6 2 5. Conditions of Approval � The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with the values of the surrounding properties or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. ` 6. Benefits to Community The proposed development will aid in aesthetically upgrading the neighborhood and will act as a catalyst in fostering other quality devel�pments. Furthermore, the development ' will add favorably to the City's housing stock and will ; provide additional affordably-priced housing in furtherance of the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. 7. Environmental Assessment The Exemption has been prepared is on file in the Community Development Department and the office of the City Clerk. ' RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2260: 1. The project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3). 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 6, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Resolution No. 2260 3. Plot Plan DISK 7:CUP 6 3 I . . �. - N' 353{' � m � � . eg —� , 3/� - - m _ -^ ° g3,r�•� ° 3 � y�o�- aSe � � a- " ' � v . -�-- �F �� .. � c 3.f3 � . ' � - d �'� � 036l0/ 3S]a � 3S17 /. "3.ff7�" . 0 0 , . C — �3SYel ` Q 3 �� 3y � �� 3ac� � o � _ .�._ o �� k m 3S9a�. � o .� � � . . `�,5,3/ _�. 3SV,�+� b�S�/9 S � a 3 . 3676 -3`-- '_L° 3596; a� � . ' 0 a'363 .�� 3a `/ � a 3 � b3 � �� 3 3s6P m � 3S7 � v�.is 57 � . . o35Y/ ° n °,.3SS7___ � 2 ° �^ �—� > 3583'a � � Go ° � —�— 3SSa � ' , 36 .8 —�— �-- �-- � /� °g35YSN 3�d .w�b -� a3SPJ 35SoZ � y �8) �� " �' �O r � \ V o . ° --a-- � — O . o� v --�— �� --w`, o •� _$�io, � a aG/i� � � 3tC? 56 � .dSf' � . 3 � D � lD . � ' 36/6 \ � r^ . °.3SS7 V C ,� � b 6 "° as e m 3coY � -��d db�t� ^ 3S r ' � 3svs _ � � � - ___ w w�— —+` , as r — — N— � o ,3vo3o� °_� . 3vrd. a d a t J a64 v r�k,. }P o3Gr� at58 36 � 2 1, ° 3Ga6. : � � 0 5 aea — 3Go� . �—� - a�� oas8� ; e . �_ ao�a: a ci3 � ",7va� a 3 /u � 1 4 d — v C w3SB7� 3(a06 C �` . F�6° :� �oalrl7 � u36d6 2 `u � O C —� ' n!N' J/E�T� � � e A'.Wh'l/F �I n!iI'%'lY �1 4 ' ti y �I i � ` 35 ) J Z .vo•irsa-E Y .�e e y 3 iso k C � 3�"' � . O . i L .. ..• s• , J i SJ� C� i`° w `C 3(0%7� o G � S `e v '� \ I � .k r3 �1 � iso `u `D A �_ �0 °� � _ � --0-- � — �? �4a . . � U - . �f �d '.�+t� a g `� �' : 6 v ` °�co �daY 0 3T8� b ' � o� I35ia � -' � N � � 6 �y —�o-_._ I 9)w �nu � C _�. 3 S.� ' °vI R Na �'' ise "� —�e k .sa a: isa o 3 f� a 7 � i�JOt �. u 34f Q 3(a Y / ��)� 0I .� /�a ° UJJ a 9)Jl �� rv /] � ___ bUCLIS' �s BULL/S � ', ..:�. _ , ,,, ' ' . � J� �• . � .50 .c � I � . .♦ . . ' _ . .. _ . . . Jo °{ o, �� o � D , .. M — � ' � � YJ ' .. �, � o � ` _ 'Q �` . N 'S „ T I � , T � v: .�E � r �� / Y �!L � p . . . . V V 6 v V ires BIYB_ �. . , s .. V . - � . � � . . /)ioJ HG /B ^ � 3 D k � �-= n � i �- i�si �� m . � . u V� V N o L O � N P \i �j • / 1Gle / Q - .O . . N � � � i!(o m � p ' � y r . . CUP6 RESOLUTION NO. 2260 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE ' PERMIT (CUP) N0.6 TO CONSTRUCT ONE (1) FOUR BEDROOM, TWO-STORY RESIDENTIAL UNIT IN THE R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, 3620 CARLIN � AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, 90262. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on subject application for a Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission carefully considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 b(3), as Amended; and WHEREAS, the site is located in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone, subject to the qranting of a Conditional Use Permit. Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as follows: ' A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the 2oning Ordinance. B. The granting of the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the Lynwood General Plan. C. The structures as proposed, or modified, subject to • conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. D. The site will be developed pursuant to the current 2oning regulati'ons and site plan submitted, reviewed and approved by the Site Plan Review Committee. E. The proposed development will add favorably to the housing stock and will provide additional affordably priced housing in concert with the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. F. The proposed development will aid in aesthetically upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in fostering other quality developments. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. CUP 6, provided the following conditions are observed and complied with at all times. ' DISK 7:RES02260 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. 2. The applicant or his representative, shall sign a Statement of Acceptance within fifteen (15) days from the date of approval of this Resolution by th� Planning Commission. Signing this statement implies that applicant or his representative has read, understands and agrees to the conditions of this Resolution. 3. All City of Lynwood Municipal Code and 2oning Ordinance requirements shall be met. - PLANNING DIVISION 4. The total development will consist of one (1) two-story residential unit, along with parking and other amenities. 6. A minimum of one (1) three-car garage shall be provided. 7. A minimum of twenty-five percent (25�) of the lot shall be landscaped and provided with an automatic irrigation system. 8. Street numbers for the new building unit numbers shall be plainly visible and shall be a minimum of four inches (4") , in height and shall be contrasting in color to the background. I 9. All construction shall be performed by a licensed contractor. 10. A landscape plan shall be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 11. No principal building on the site shall exceed a height of thirty-five (35') feet. 12. Construction shall be completed within six (6) months from date of issuance of buildinq permits. 13. The Conditional Use Permit shall become null and void if compliance under the foregoing conditions does not commence within ninety (90) days from the date on which the Conditional Use Permit was granted. 1'4. A masonry wall six feet (6') in height shall be constructed along the perimeter of the property, except within the twenty foot (20') front yard setback, which shall not exceed four feet (4') in height. Construction of a fence in the front yard set-back is optional (not required). 15. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in a sanitary condition pending construction, and shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure to comply may result in revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. 16. Final building elevations, including materials of construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the Building Official prior to issuance of any building permits. DISK 7:RES02260 2 ! 17. Before any building permits may be issued, the applicant/ • developer shall pay $1.53 per square foot for residential buildings to the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government Code Section 53080. PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING CONDITIONS 18. Provide an irrevocable offer of dedication for five (5) foot wide strip of property along Carlin Avenue. 19. Provide an irrevocable offer of dedication for sufficient property to accommodate a radius at the southwest corner of Bullis Road and Carlin Avenue. 20. Submit a grading plan prepared and siqned by a registered Civil Engineer. 21. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk along Bullis Road and Carlin Avenue. 22. Construct a new drive approach per City standards at Bullis Road. 23. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected separately. Construct laterals as necessary. 24. Install two (2) 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood standards along Bullis Road. Species to be Crade Myrtle. A permit to install the trees is required by the Engineering Division. Exact locations of the tree(s) will be determined at the time the permit is issued. 25. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass. 26. Underground all utilities. 27. Underground existing utilities if any modifications are proposed for the electrical service panel for the existing unit. 28. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all off-site improvements. 29. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any work. FIRE DEPARTMENT 30. If security bars are placed on bedroom windows, at least one window for each bedroom shall have quick release mechanisms that does not require a key or any special knowledge. U.B.C. Sec. T209 31. Provide smoke detectors, (U.L. and State Fire Marshal approved type.) Section 3. A copy of Resolution No. 2260 shall be delivered to the applicant. I DISK 7:RES02260 ( I 3 i � :.PPF.OVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of March, 1989, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES• NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Donald A. Dove, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Vicente L. Mas, Director pouqlas D. Barnes , Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney DISK 41:RES02260 � I 4 k CUP 7 ��'� , , , � . � F DATE: March 14, 1989 ' ; � .., ; _'�•.. , , ;,, . ;ik::;; 1VC/ TO: PLANNING COMMISSION �...,:."_;,� ". .�� FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director G U r �JO. �� -. Community Development Department SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -CASE NO. 7 ' Applicant: Marcos & Guadalupe Arellano PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop a two story two (2) bedroom detached dwelling unit in R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone at 3592 Los Flores Blvd., Lynwood, CA: FACTS: 1. Source of Authority Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to build or relocate dwelling units in the R-3 zone. 2. Property Location The subject property as consists of one (1) rectanqular lot on the south side of Los Flores Blvd. (refer to attached Location Map). 3. Property Size The site is approximately fifty (50') feet wide and one hundred and eighty feet (180') feet deep with a area of approximately 9,000 square feet. 4. Existing Land Use The property is presently developed with one single family residence. The surrounding land uses are as follows: North - Multi-Family South - Commercial East - Multi-Family West - Multi-Family 5. Land Use Description I _ The General Plan designation for the subject property is I Multi-Family Residential, and the zoning classification is R-3. The surrounding land use designations are as follows: General Plan Zoning I North - Multi-Family North - R-3 � South - Commercial South - C-2 I East - Multi-Family • East - R-3 � West - Multi-Family West - R-3 I I � DISK 7:CUP 7 � I i I 1 I . I _ I • 6. Project Characteristics � The applicant is proposing to develop a two (2) story, detached residencial unit consistir�g oi �wo uedrooms with an attached two car garage. Construction will also include an additional two car garage for the existing single family home. Landscaping consist of approximately twenty nine percent � (29$). 7. Site Plan Review On February 22, 1989, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and recommended approval by the Planning Commission, subject to specific conditions. 8. Zonina Enforcement History None of record. 9. Public Response No response as of the writing of this report. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION 1. Consistency with General Plan The property is consistent with the existing zoning classification (R-3) and the General Plan designation (Multi- Family Residential). Therefore, granting Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 7 will not adversely affect the Lynwood General Plan. 2. Site Suitability The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development relative to density, bulk of the structures, parking, walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Zoninq Ordinance. The property is adequately served with the required public utilities and offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessiblity. 3. Compatibility The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of low medium and hiqh density residential developments; therefore, the project will be compatible with developments in the area. 4. Com�liance with Development Standards The proposal meets all of the development standards required by the 2oning Ordinance with respect to parking; front, side, and rear-yard setbacks; distance between structures; I lot coverage; open space and landscaping; building height; unit size and density. The base density within the R-3 zone (18 unit/acre) allows the i development of three (3) units. However, as stated above the final development will consist of only two (2) dwelling units. 5. Conditions of Approval The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Co�nittee, will not have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with the values of the surrounding properties or or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. � DISK 7:CUP7 � i 2 I � I 6. Benefits to Community � The proposed development will aid in aesthetically upgrading the neighburiiood ar:�`wil_ ac� as a catalys•c in fostering other quality developments. Furthermore, the development will add favorably to the City's housing stock and will provide additional affordably-priced housing in furtherance . of the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. 7. Environmental Assessment The exemption has been prepared and in on file in the Community Development Department and the office of the City Clerk. RECOI�IENDATION • Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2266: 1. The project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3) 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 7, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Resolution No. 2266 3. Plot Plan DISK 7:CUP 7 I I � I f I � 3 � i � � V `5 ,. ` � �. . ... _J ,� °` r � �,�,�9 7 NK �a� j f,� 3 . � . � � � , A ?. �` \ 4 � � o= '^ � v � T �1 9 �� Y O 9 �\ �y`� � � � �Z � 5 at O py �� •i � , �b y � \� =•'r � I a_ ' �� - n � � Y °�o �8 a . b s � ' \- � o ��J , , 1 � l � `� J P 0�� `� � � SDf � �� w �' O� `; o a a I 6° �� x � '",� " 4 N� q � � . I 9 '� ` ' i� �i - .° . y�� _ o `�60fL w a�� / e � � . � �`^ fii�l� �� '� _'�a' 9 .'$ s S�9E, . n F_ R'�FDi � �Q �' „ �° £ � °� ' ' � . . i :o�' �� Ni Fov£ .. � o°°re � J toae Po4' a � °� �n Q , � 0�� o � 2 3 o� y � �94Y1. � ^` L Sho9 w _ _ 9 o Z o h �` '�o�£ �t ' a o b --- � � e, In ioqE a W �85sC 7 co� E� � aN h 0 q� Q 9� � + evvs —'eo�L a[ts , i (� � �%% L 6 � R I e s �'E S � . ss 8 yZj 6SE l6fE � � 6��r 1\ �, .tn,o:.v Z ^ "t{ � J �_ w+:�. —�--_ '�° � � -- e � —�-- --�--- W � �. I ^ n �P h � 04 � � / � .� - � m . - —. - � 096 i� ` e` i � �' sF ^w ht6SE . �6S'£ ' _ "�'sy� � , y 6 � � � � '�� R` � „--E wa. _ 3 .. ... . ��P1E „ TSese <tsE' Q � 66st ., x 83'E g d8,s' z , � -- , . � _ -T�-- � - s- J tl y a � 8!S � lBSE R t8 �� ✓s£ c 9sp Lss �� Ces R ' Ydsf m y y� �jyS E �.LS� Ei 9L£ Ce(e x ecS£, r,�,��_ ^ Lt9L '9tss� v , O '^ '? "�� L� � -�O � —��.�o � � �°t'CfF^ �FC 9E 'OCS£ � � W � � ., 08S£ �� •rese ��sc^ �� Q . � � ° M � � O �JS E o �� s � '^sRSE _ �b � N'JSe ,.� `,( � . • M 2 i 7GJ �/'�yvc �._— � � eo 59.�' ' ' — � \ n — .� — -:r — � , � � ,L'7SC � H o • �7 sE U i ^ ° � � '�LS'E l � �9s� e �95�' £�s£ /��N `�1 ,�, � L SS£� o � L9 �sF cs_=2 '9�se� 9 � �t ^ 9�sE —� ---• O I � ,�• A „ y O b _� N � S£$ _�N 9G N ` '; s�x /�99£ ��'SF osse� ersr bssL £ss£ i__ F 'psfF� o�,.., 2 ----� V Q /� 9£ � $ �,trc � g 8/�S£ Y9,�s�'� ��'a�E ; '%.s �-�— --�sre o ��- N � •9.sse ' _.�— �--- N � / � S E S P SF 8 W 9 p,s s� ih r $' p.s9 e £.s ' 3 sOtiSF °. A� £.SSc �' P,csE �.. 0 6 rs ; � �sesE 2 „ f9E o SFs£ M � h�ps �eesE . ' r.cs W: trse R a'9rse� (1( � � � £�'_ _ _..p_ Z �� —�� o —_�i— N �/ v � QL/4 a �ESC F(/� '��1�FSP fFG h�fF Th m Of�£ FF�F � Mlf£ T �/P)� fF � 9 �S� ,. brs£ Q � �esF i St � ns£ ' �o � F � �CP1'E ro' _ -� .°,� �_.._ --� — �.. ^ — e — �Ff1£ � b � � a+ �, �/f'S£ .tPS£ n 9PSE ... . � : �P�'£ m £r�/' St disf ' opsP� � �' , S o 8S£ M °,/ S' £. L i.�£_ o 9iSF ^ � _ . r . M � �iSf � _ _--!o£ iSf � .r-. � � '___— 3 ' �—_ .. =� ^ M . CUP7 RESOLUTION NO. 2266 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE � PERMIT N0.7 TO CONSTRUCT A TWO BEDROOM, TWO- STORY RESIDENTIAL UNIT IN THE R-3 (MULTI-FAMILY) RESIDENTZAL ZONE, 3592 LOS FLORES BLVD. LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, 90262. WIiEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on subject application for a Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission carefully considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and wHEREAS, the Community Development director has determined that the proposal is Exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15D61 b(3), as Amended; and WHEREAS, the site is located in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone, subject to the granting of a Conditional Use Permit. Section 1. The Planninq Commission hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape ' to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. B. The granting of the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the Lynwood General Plan. . C. The structures as proposed, or modified, subject to conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. D. The site will be developed pursuarit to the current zoning regulations and site plan submitted, reviewed and approved by the Site Plan Review Committee. I E. The proposed development will add favorably to the housing stock and will provide additional affordably priced housing in concert with the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. F. The proposed development will aid in aesthetically upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in fostering other quality developments. DISK 7:RE502266 � i i 1 I , Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, � based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby approves Conditional Use•Permit, Case No. CUP 7, pr.pvided the following conditions are observed and complied with at all times. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. 2. The applicant or his representative, shall sign a Statement of Acceptance within fifteen (15) days from the date of approval of this Resolution by the Planning Commission. Signing this statement implies that applicant or his represenative has read, understands and agrees to the conditions of this Resolution. 3. All City of Lynwood Municipal Code and Zoning Ordinance requirements shall be met. PLANNING DIVISION 4. The total development will consist of one (1) two- I story residential unit with a minimum of two (2) two-car garaqes. 5. A minimum of twenty-five percent (25�) of the lot shall be landscaped and provided with an automatic irrigation system. 6. Street numbers for the new dwelling shall be plainly visible and shall be a minimum of four inches (4") in height and shall be contrasting in color to the background. 7. All construction shall be performed by a licensed contractor. 8. A landscape plan shall be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. No principal building on the site shall exceed a height of thirty-five (35') feet. 10. Construction shall be completed within six (6) months from date of isssuance of building permits. 11. The Conditional Use Permit shall become null and void if compliance under the foregoing conditions does not commence within ninety (90) days from the date on which the Conditional Use Permit was granted. 12. A masonry wall six feet (6') in height shall be constructed along the perimeter of the property, except within the twenty foot (20') front yard setback, which shall not exceed four feet (4') in height. Construction of a fence in the front yard set- back is optional (not required). 13. The existinq property shall be cleaned and maintained in a sanitary condition pending construction, and shall be main- tained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure to comply may result in revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. 14. Final building elevations, including materials of construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the Building Official prior to issuance of any building permits. DZSK 7:RES02266 ( I 2 I � I � 15. Before any buildinq permits may be issued, the applicant/developer shall pay $1.53 per square foot for residential buildings to tfie Lynwood Unified School District, � pursuant to Government Code Section 53080. PUBLIC WORKS 16. Provide documentation that lots composing the property were legally subdivided to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. After reviewing the documents, the Department of Public works may require the submission and recordation of a parcel map or lot merger. THIS MATTER MUST BE CLEARED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BEFORE ANY BUZLDING PERMITS ARE ISSUED. 17. Dedicate five (5) foot wide strip of property alonq Los Flores Blvd. 18. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered Civil Enqineer. 19. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk along Los Flores Blvd. 20. Reconstruct damaged and substandard drive approach (es), per City standards. 21. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected separately. Construct laterals as necessary. 22. Install one (1) 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood standards alonq Los Flores Blvd. Species to be Crape Myrtle. A permit to install trees is required by the Engineering Division. Exact locations of the tree (s) will be determined at the time the permit is issued. 23. Regrade parkway and landscape with qrass. 24. Underground all utilities. 25. Underground existing utilities if any modifications are proposed for the electrical service panel for the existing unit. 26. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all off-site improvements. 27. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any work. FIRE DEPARTMENT 28. If security bars are placed on bedroom windows, at least one window for each bedroom shall have an approved release mechanism that does not require a key or any special knowledge. U.B.C. Section 1204 29. Provide smoke detectors, (U.L. and State Fire Marshal approved type.) Section 3. A copy of this Resolution shall be delivered to the applicant. DISK 7:RES02266 I I i 3 . ( APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of March, 1989, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: i - AYES: NOES: - ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Donald A. Dove, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney DISK 7:RES02266 � I I I � I ( � 4 � � �, CUP 8 � ,.. . .. DATE: March 14, 1989 1 , ,��, :, ,._.,_. , � � �,, � 8 ' TO: PLANNING COMMISSION �� G , �t'��, s 1. J. P FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director • � Community Development Department SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -CASE NO. 8 Applicant: Yi Chin Su PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit in order to sale beer and wine at his convience store in a new mini-shopping center in the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone at 10404 - Long Beach Boulevard, Lynwood. FACTS- 1. Source of Authority Ordinance No. 1306 of the Lynwood Municipal Code determines that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained for the operation of businesses pertaining to the sale of alcoholic beverages. 2. Propertv Location and Existing Land Use The subject property is located on the south side o£ Long Beach Boulevard between Seminole and Tenaya Avenues. It is developed with a fourteen thousand square feet (14,000) Mini- Shopping Center. The following are the surrounding land uses: North- Commercial East-Commercial South- Residential West- Commercial 3. Land Use Description The General Plan designation for the said property is Commercial and the Zoning Classification is C-3(Heavy Commercial) The surrounding land uses are as follows: General Plan Zoning Commercial North -C-3 - Multi-Family Residential South -R-3 Commercial ` East -C-3 Commercial West -C-3 4. Project Characteristics The applicant proposes to re-establish his business that was discontinued in order to redevelop the property to its present status. The original business was a convenience store that had an off-sale beer and wine license. Measured at approximately one thousand three hundred (1,300') square feet, the proposed market is one of eight stores of the mini-shopping center; like the previous convenience store, the ' proposal would also incorporate the sale of beer and wine for off — site consumption. DISK 41:CUP8 1 • I � � � `: The complex is adequately developed and provides the required � parking, landscaping and a trash enclosure. 5. Site Plan Review: , At its regular meeting on February 23, 1989, the Site Plan Review Committee examined the prevailing circumstances against the requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance and recommended that the.Planning Commission deny the permit. 6. Zoning Enforcement History None of Record. 7. Public Response: None ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION 1. Consistency with General Plan The property is consistent with the existing zoning � classification (C-3) and the General Plan designation (Heavy Commercial). However, the proposed use falls short of both the requirements of the City's General Plan and its Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, granting Conditional Use Permit Case No. 8 will adversely affect the Community. 2. Site Suitability See Staff Analysis and Appropriate Findings 3. Compatibility See Staff Analysis and Appropriate Findings � 4. Compliance with Development Standards See Staff Analysis and Appropriate Findings 5. Conditions of Approval None 6. Environmental Assessment An environmental checklist has been prepared as in the State CEQA Guidelines, amended in (Section 15303, Class 3). The checklist and Negative Declaration is on file in the City Clerk's Office and in the Community Development Department. 7. Staff Analysis and Appropriate Findings 1. Contrary to the provisions of Ordinance No. 1306, the proposed use is: a. less than five hundred-(500') feet from the nearest - off-sale beer and wine establishment. b. Adjacent to a medium and high density residential zones. 2. Although the shopping center meets the standard parking requirements with ingress and egress in and out of the faci2ity, the proposal may generate more traffic that would interfere with the movement of pedestrian traffic. � DISK 44:CUP8 2 , � 3. With the proliferation of off-site sale of alcoholic '+. beverages within the three quarter.(3/4) mile stretch of Long Beach Boulevard between Century and Tweedy Boulevards (at the moment six establishments see attached ) and coupled with the medium to high density residential neighborhoods, the area could easily be a - , haven for loitering and as been found in past situations. 4. The previous off-sale beer and wine license at the subject address operated under an earlier ordinan�e that was repealed by Ordinance No. 1306. Thus any application for off-sale beer and wine license must address all the requirements and conditions of the current ordinance. 5. The proposal as submitted will adversely affect the city's General Plan. RECONII9ENDATION - Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission deny the request for Conditional Use Permit: • 1. Finding that Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 8 falls short of ordinance No 1306. 2. Denying Conditional Use Permit No. 8, as it will- adversely affect the City's General Plan: Attachment 1. Location Map • 2. Site Plan DISK 4 4:CUP 8 3 List of an off-sale beer and wine establishments on Long Beach ' Boulevard between Century and Tweedy Boulevards. „ 1. 10539 Eddie's Jr. LiquorjGrocery Store 2. 10427 Carneceria Meat Market . 3. 10341 La Mexina Market 4. 10236 Villa Clarra Market 5. 9990 E1 Ahorro Super Market_ 6. 9937 Lyngate Liquor � ; i �L.00ATION �VIAP ..,,,,. �� i - __.,_...-- " — 65 64 6i 62 E � � / � i ) u_ /en1..�� 52 R� � . 67 .� _ ,YI ��.._ wu o � C --JO/ D �� iolq /el ' � � � �' /O/J I OII ` N � �u � 0�l0.. n DS ` • . , �.�� 121 72 � � /oi7J �y ? . . ,�� n �aiP� _" � � ti � ; �4a,�� \ �a��r� �c �s eo ar a . � �' ,o, _ � ;o,�, �a;��o is1 0/�7o:z - �� M/CH/GAM y� 9 , i�_ i0a�i r io . . . . . �. � W � � ` �� ' . � 155 �20 _ o i1 9T .Q �°�o u� 95 9d 93 92 J _ ��, u9 100 .` W �/ o aTo y � N p ' Z Z 351 !16 ��it 101 Y ~ �/oaiy � � . � 1 � /0>l� ` .- H�0 � IIS Ip/�ay� . IOt .:p�4 � ID 0� �� 106 IOT 108 109� 11 . Sfl '� ' ' AJ /D?t /olJ: � /O�ay u /1G � r '� r �SCQUO/A � o ' � � i uoi oi oi . � – ..8�e3oqyj a !o too -ano 30 � . � � t a a o p itd �� Z7� �219 218 11T 216 115 214 11 � g � 115 ��1I0 . � _ e a I eo i �ro3D� ? itG . i � i956 . ii �- 3 h /03� � . li a lO i 9 �� i . 19 � l96 197 190 � Iri Z00 201 ZO 8 ^�PPC � °�, ° �� eo � . � cHeROKee $ � a � � � i ' � M x $ ' . . . . . l7 li !�4 � i5 �� • i71 Itl9 � �8tl 7, Itl6 185 IC4 11 rf I i L7L__ '� � SIl_ � . J� � ' '/D3 y . q� i . . , �� . i -�� r�! � �6� ��a '1� I� J I I 25 w 14 I t3 ;� It � ibd . �dd� �7'' l6J 7p I 17�( l7 , � ��o,: 1�OQ `is�i63�m ,` I� �� ly !� �� lo �� N I _` � 7CNAYA ' ,u V .. � � �� 3//O4o � I'� (a W �o w y W W W o � y �16 e 27 Itl i�29 � � : 1 ��y oYp � la7 �l� �f5p �/516 : IS�S� �I51�O1: � J � � � 3 � , nvii •� I I I I .o � � _ . . .. a y h � . � /36 o m z �o' ' . �I �y !o J � JLI35/OYiS , I I I I I . � . IZ U OU � ':37 35 7 3 ��35 g H7 w l�tl 1'J� l4;1 . 141 1 --/9l1L1Dy a � W � �w 4a k�) .. � ,.�e ' - Dv) ID �' � w b �� o �W � Z !Tl J b W W Q Y V . �} S£M/NOL E � � ..,;.. �.� - 8 n . . � . � , � p I I � /p �/ V / ./ G W Of W w � �('� a i� I� � I� �' ° - . .°' . u , u y � J ,�y✓ i �� .s s o �3 � /06� a: i�o'C ° i.+a � �e ��7� . ... a`' � �s �e �tUDS�S. � . M I /4S7 �� . � �O I IO IS I b 10 I 10 1 � / a a 56 „ . . y'� " . l�g W �`+ ' � �1s— v ' l�s� u..._��. � m � io .� Ql `' 6/ 60 '� � I� 11 I SR /or � � I . 1. h � _�iD¢Z<ef/ J q0 �; ��J W n.l i�Y � `w W y � s 7 �� Bo � o v ` � � K0 t3 i V . ' y� TfGUMSEH � $ - <s I�ol as � CASE NO. '$ �,, r � , . . '. r ..,�. - _ ,.::_ .:_,: ; ::��.. ., ��:�. 9 DATE: March 14, 1989 -' / -. _. ,`�" TO: PLANNING COMMISSION r �'`' = � �B I —� FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: Variance Case No. 1 Applicant: Lawrence R. and Brenda J. Bible Proposal- The applicants are requestinq a variance for a five (5') foot high wrouqht iron fence along the front yard setback of their property in the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) zone at 10992 Pine Avenue, Lynwood. Facts• 1. Source of Authority. While Section 25 9.7 of the Lynwood Municipal Code regulates fences in all residential zones, Section 25-26 requires that a Variance be obtained from the Planning Commission when, because of special circumstances applicable to the property, the strict application of the 2oning Ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. 2. Prooerty Location and Size The site is located on the East side of Pine Avenue between Imperial Boulevard and Pendleton Avenue. It is rectangular in shape and measured at approximately 7,588.4 square feet (68.5'x110.78'). 3. Existina Land Use The site is developed with a Single Family home and is surrounded by the following land uses: North- Residential � South- Residential I East- Residential West- Residential I 4. Land Use Description General Plan Zoning North- Residential R-1 South- Residential R-1 East- Residential R-1 West- Residential R-1 5. Project Characteristics The variance request would allow the applicant to extend the height of the proposed fence from the required forty eight(48") inches as determined by the Zoning Ordinance to sixty (60") inches thus making a difference of twelve (12") inches. 6. Site Plan Review At its regular meeting of February 23, 1989 the Site Plan Review Committee denied the proposed project. DISK 45:VARIANI I I 1 ! I � � 7. Zoninq Enforcement History ' None of record. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: 1. Consistency with General Plan � The proposed land use is consistent with the existing Zoning classification R-1 and the General Plan designation of Single Family Residential. 2. Site Suitability The property is adequate in size and shape to accomodate a standard fence relative to structures, parking, walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Compatibility The proposed heiqht of the fence is incompatible with the heights of fences on neighboring properties. 4. Compliance with Development Standards Specific Findings: The property is a standard lot with no hardships experienced that would require an exceptional privilege and does not meet the State reguiremnts for findings of a Variance. Undoubtedly granting of this Variance would set a precedent in the city that would eventually result in the increased construction of fences of this nature. ' Staff's determination of these findings is to recommend denial to the Planning Commission on the Variance request. 5. Environmental Assessment This development is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines. RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission deny the Variance Request: a. Finding that a hardship has not been established that would require a Variance for Case No. 1 as determined by Section 25-26 of the City of Lynwood Zoning Code. b. Finding that the applicant/property'owner will not be deprived of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same vicinity if the recommendation of denial is upheld. . DISK 45:VARIANI � I i 2 I I LOCATION MAP m ,: , ,�� ,,., - h. , � , � n h '( ' �"^ ,,,� 6� ,,,�� '9 �' - �I ,.r,�.l ,.� U ein' -- �ysou `t a�is - lunslu��a, " PENOLETON �� ' �- °� — '� � Jy 9. ��ID I/ Ii ., �� f ��u �� O), q 11�0 .t0 6a,V � f � �I i ��y-0� /IU�� 040a' �05DIp � ` Ss � �4JV h q a L � r3aY �^i6llof�7 io9� � ��i'fi�l ale� ( I � i �� 05'7 /9 �/ �ig9id Q y3do - �o Ht�°' I.''i y9a � ��°�'� 1 1 5 � \ pa3olr m . 3 , I � 3 � � 1e96 J. _ � I y � �IO�di . 1�4jz �B1D �D d� V I59 �°, /66�ot3 I � N GID53� 50. ro1b/ r��aaE � I p i � I I" r �J � �SB� /67°5�7 0 � I vi : i�ti s'' . iaPy� 1 a�ti> N � J /p y I 5 --�2 %'! . O , /69 I y 'S� /b /oQS"/ 1066 �46i �� 55� / + 6 � naio i56f L3 � . /b9 ° I � 0 '°� BGOCK A . �(�� GOC Ba ia , BLO C � `y � � )3 u l0 1 d �� 7i��1 I i b �pyYl iss :>� no � � `I � �85�� . �j 0 j0�3i � �os,a � � I � R a . "' "I %50 l7/ P ,� '+I" v8/ e 09�� o%�$! /o587.g Iw a �"� s � ; �PG H» Y ""� Z � ' �, � � �'� . � I 'rae � A � 4 _—��1-�- �0�9/ c� reS��a y,ai �,�� l 9 s Hi�E Y�Y/ 7.�{� ro� — — a i.ro .er .o� I fr. a[ S99[ o >lN - �i. � . ! \ /MPER/AL 3/3 w rJ � ✓ r' �, R�• !o � . ofo ,Si, (e� .So y } al � h,a4 � I d --- I s e ,7, z; i ,qW ia n io s% e 0 6 er s I `� � ro —J `� ' � � S, � h> 5�` i` �i�ti'1 � S,' i, A i ' / � �' �. ' ,� . . • . . ��/I. �'Y • RJ \ 1 TRACT anP'�aan. J� y ' y .e •, : u, b zi ak; is� �v i �s. i'' ia � ., v , 9 � •�� , � ,,� �` � ? � a s �' y a �. n ` e3 )° i L � ifs �i Ih „ ' "'e LOS FLORES m � b � • � �� ur. ww i�' K� orr ioa.y a p •.�e� � .i f � , . A��i9� �. �o f l/o)s' v c. tJ i I l� / J e � ,+ I . � p i o �` //e�Y 0 � 8 • , ti � I . �.• ��oSo �, d i,oJS ' h O�a ' iivy I�' �� ) � I�ayJ°9 ° o /i e3/ b J I ImSy $ � _ � Z 8 jJ � °e ya - • I_ � 8 � L°63• �� 2r ��ay , � zz� ' � �,oe� g� ; S /ipa y � 9 va f . I . � '� ° zi �w i' � " � $ Ao�3 h vS1. � 1 //py • � S ,f�Y ° .�a� � I �e= `�� oao .i�oiy� 1°aSo � � h � y � � � $ lio8o �6`.o Y $.`� Y °' i.v �'ao ^ no7/ � iio�i .rovY I b s RA , s 8 � y a � �/ 07� �� x_ S � � /0)b D / f � s p a + �O- Z $ g ` �7 �V i06 V 0 Q � e �Q ' O p � ` \ b� 1� �Q \ / ` V � fC��" `�f sa'' 9�o s� a �� v ., � :OV�r ' �? / �<l�� >vo. ✓��. 1 I � � c ' - ^ -" , ��u , �: � ' - � 0 S� ��/Y J� JdJ 1� ��{��-��}-�f��-f�-��-1-�-}f-/�7�!-r�'tf'rli-Ilii�/dir.rrrr�rr{�IIl�-rrr}}lrl-1" • __.._....., � Z `� � � Ti � R 1 1� o� • �' � m Z -_ (� o � � � � �' � � Z 2 - ° y� r� u//1 � � y \ �`n m � � / \ CT/� `i r�'lY�' " b� N-� � E � � � 3 -� I �. � � �� —> zo � ° �� 1 � R � n J � m � � � W `.S tTi� � O��JCWA-� � G �° tL � � o �I � 3 = � Pt F— �:o�K i,�.h L� sz � -� �i 3z' ac,o � wr�L , � .Z`m P�,e,'� � {� wy ' ... ij'.-" . ' '� :': � :rt 1 ' ' � �, ; '. AC r �� ,� ► i �iJl NU, � .�-_ `�� DATE: March 14. 1989 ` GASE N�, ,..�A !`�� ° ''lfj; PLANNING COMMISSION FROMr Vicente L. Mas, Director " Community Development Department . _ SUBJECT: Variance Case No. 2 - Applicant: Ceneyda Reyes PROPOSAL � Applicant is requesting a Variance in order to provide only three • (3) attached one-car garages to serve three residential units in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone at 10471 San Vicente Avenue, Lynwood, CA. FACTS: 1. Source of Authority While Section 25-4.5 of the Lynwood Municipal Code regulates development standards in all residential zones, Section 25-26 requires that a Variance be obtained from the Planning Commission when, because of special circumstances applicable to the property, the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by ' other properties in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification 2, ,Property Location and Size The site is located on the north side of San Vicente at the intersection of Imperial Highway. It is rectangular in shape and measured at approximately 5,040 square feet (42'X120'). 3. Existina Land Use The site presently serves a Single Family Residential house and two apartment units; it is surrounded by the following land uses: North- Residential South- Commercial/Hospital, Medical & Dental • East- Residential/Commercial . West- Residential 4. Land Use Description: The general plan designation of the ' subject property is Multi-Family Residential and the Zoning Classification is R-3. The surrounding land uses are as follows: General Plan Zoning North- Multi-Family Residential R-3 South- Commercial/Medical CB1/HPID East- Multi-Family Residential R-3 , West- Multi-Family Residential/ R-3/C-2 Commercial DISK 44:VARIAN2 , 1 ' . I I � 5. Proiect Characteristics w Measured at approximately five thousand and forty (5,040) sq. ' ft., the subject property is determined to be a substandard lot yet it has three legal dwelling units. While the single family house had permits since 1944, the other two units had permits pulled in 1959 and since that time only three one car garages were provided. However, due to the lot size the three dwelling units do not meet the standard requirements of the city�s current zoning code with respect to parking, front, side, and rear yard setbacks. Under these conditions the said buildings could be categorized as legal nonconforming buildings and should be arandfathered in without remodeling. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the applicant is requesting a parking variance that would allow him to provide only three one car garages for the three dwelling units rather than the required six parking spaces three of which should be covered as determined by Section 25-4.5 of the Lynwood Municipal Code. The applicant also proposes to enclose an existing porch, remodel the living room, kitchen and bath on the single family house. 6. Site Plan Review: At its regular meeting on February 22, 1989, the Site Plan Review Committee recommended denial of the proposed project to the Planning Commission with an understanding that two of three units were illegally built. However, the applicant retrieved and submitted documents from the Los Angeles County Recorder's office to substantiate his argument about the legality of the three dwelling units. Copies of the documents are hereby attached. 7. Zonina Enforcement History None of Record. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: 1. Consistencv with General Plan The proposed land use is consistent with the existing Zoning classification R-3 and the General Plan designation of Multi-Family Residential. 2. Site Suitability The property is substandard as it is inadequate in size (5,040 sq. ft. instead of 6,500 sq. ft. for corner lots) and I shape (42'x 120") to accomodate a standard fence relative to structures, parking, walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Compatibility Though proposal to provide only three one-car garages for three units may be incompatible with the parking provisions on neighboring propeities. Special circumstances as described in this report outweight the incompatibility issue. 4. Environmental Assesment �.This proposal is categorically exempt from the provisions I of the State CEQA Guidelines. I DZSK 44:VARIAN2 � I I 2 ; ; ' S. Compliance with Development Standards and Staff's Appropriate Findings Per Section 25-15 of the City of Lynwood Zoning Code, the said buildings are categorized as Legal nonconformina buildings. By definition, a leqal nonconforminq building is one that was built prior to the adoption o£ the cnrrent zoning code and - falls short of the standard requirements of said code. A nonconforming building cannot be expanded or structurally chanqed and if up to fifty (50$) percent is destroyed (by fire or by any other calamity), it cannot be rebuilt in its original form but shall meet all the standard requirements and conditions of the existing zoning code. In the circumstance therefore, staff's determination of these findinqs is to recommend approval only of the parking • Variance request and adopt the attached Resolution No. 2267. RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission approve the Variance Request and adopt Resolution No. 2267 1. Finding that a Variance Case No. 2 will not have a significant effect on the environment and certify the Negative Declaration as adequate. 2. Approving Variance No. 2 subject to the standard conditions and requirements. Attachments: LoCation Map Site Plan � Resolution No. 2267 DISK 44:VARIAN2 3 �� r , � � . l � . . _ . _ . _ .. ., r .a„�... /j—�� l� G/9/ .. �eeem�acdbn-se . � �� .� _(}t� . " BLDG. SLIP L A. Coun#y A�ssessor':Office eooK a-�d ,- ;:n . ^[ . � � n„�� . e. sT.NO. / � � Gy'/�.�� ;o:, �G�%�-,�; � OATE ' TRACT ^ � � ` . v,l � /J ,z s� v'T �� - ox.�� .� � i ON.M:B. ON AY . � � • , ,u g �„� �/ BY _ �!!J/ J T / 9�� lOT NO. `/'F '7.i � YI ' �'/�BLOCK NO. � � , �`� P �!� AP PRAIBEDBI' - �y(//1�oDATE /� 7 9._+� I OATE � �� - � .. . C� E R I Q R N F A 7 � N C E 7 I T. f E I TUR E S /! Bonplwl . 1 1K finplaa Sln[b GYI. 7/sll:' WooO .. j�y[�o-T/. ��J Slv[u 000ei Srie�tostl Gas fnmap: 11M� Ste�l . l� / �� G �-1� /� � . 4sitl�oa SEalus, ■ L 61o�nr Spou _ /J A rC p : Cal SIEIa[ Slin{1 iW�b O T � /e�.3 i7' � /i�'� e �" i `/ s�+��J .' in.T v:r`�u n(�we . c ��. ".a �� . ��- � "� G �, /��/� : nan �se..ee. simn[ w,�fN .er / � Banplaw Cowt B�iet Ww�� ia0iaet N�rt J pyropL! Im �Ir CmC� IRSIOf fIN1SN . � pJ'.Z- � O _ w a t Flrt Galr. Irv� P1a�tarSana Me. Unlb � y Cort. ►Ivmieoo I�HIlNM � Ma p�h Tnns�y / Kp� ryy �y-e�. � � tlnit / � Ffar�: M� Sh� tWMBINC . �aae r�� g[e Me. A Pu. �i2 WaPla��/ Pu�ll �� ' . Hb- flrt. 1011r ColoR� PaiE[, hW�. Unflals 0 - �ow sm vra.+r�` a++�m.. . . - -. nst �rr r1 v, m. nwr I I 1 ,. � xlrseN Menit � n I I ,IItT'� ��bba • Oorw nN/ia6 I I I �� vour - • - � FOUNO ior 5�� m• waus I I.� oa�s.n.r � . . � , CM� VI Sbvt • Cla� �' � . . . se..e m•� s x•ic�rt 1 I I r� • a. � .. . aHis�a . eoRwc.a im sne... q q,•_ �� ' � ` Crost w.n.. w Flrt Gah. IrM qwr 7u0 I I'�! BUI T - ' . eort.l�aml��m Shc� I I I �9� . � . � . . ': sti.i iam nm �,,,,00 � m. wai. 1 I I - � ' . BASEMfNT C � ° � ' � . . /W�stm SOm[I�s I I I � . . � � - . . . J ' n : � � m Class 0'r. � � � 0� r. Rab I . . ' ^ WoaE Sbil�Treul %II'o . I 19.1� , . . . . 5 � ' UCXTINC .. , .�. e s o v��u � � urin[ Roos r.ar . . - . U�in[-0IOio{ f . - : Combleatla� n, f / , , . � � . � e.a�nams � • i Rw1 � � . , . onsslni I�. BclU. ,/�� ' . � _ � Ya1a� 5' W'L ' No ToE Yaln GM� .. . � IOtfAu Y�Iw p ? p BwN OMA ' . �. io'min Yalw . . B7st R. a OR , �u . � 7 /' ruet ( 1 � zgec �t 1. y? =-s" 3� Y��....�.-:i.r /y�/f ea.e. tiowa � xa.a. ooa+ �, tle�a. FleIY ' 176 " . . �p o . % vt. va�. . FE�. . Fnm� �eef fl m 7Nm hbt �IG. lt{. /) •. '7 4�(� , �� I� .� I � tla ea ip �G� • . � OWNEF•B / � . O�e. ^ ! �. sf�ss! � Vec. P�. inas� ' NAME. �I�Z�J7✓.�= !� par Oepr• DaD�• ��% Yala� Teu OeOr. Oepr. Yalw Yalu� � ' PCwr�n Na. Dwr[ Awourn /p �ij •• �. ^r %�" • � CHECKEO ..�?—_— / '�I!LOMIf. CM[CC[O �~ •` - /d �// i //� � / � . ° E. au .. � '.:i . ; Yr' ..'. .B. '_ " ' �/�/ ` .i^� " .`./ . ` Owr[ J � • f -�- : � � �� :'�.rowr. P�CiO. " �; —�I- +} - - "___ _' � Building �c cri tion lilank I°`de" �� . � LOS ANGELEB COUNi� ._iF590 5 qFFICE ��CL—YLS� �• ,"'�. - • �T. No.._L� �.7 1s..S'�'__��irT ar� ' ; . TnwcT " � � � � �" ' � .. � . � . . . �. � ' �' Lor No --. � �5� �' / _B�xK No � ExwMincn ev ' o�r q^/1 ts�' � - .. � � ' � � ��TEY�OA NGTING IXT. FFATUM1Lf � p� � T i�h 2 3 .oq F7*Klac� S1ngN CbL Sfwl SasA Atl� PaM - Buw9ab✓� fhcw! 0.�#ic Fakt lAawfel �Oq. SpouH ' Dou6N� Skakes, bOBGaaFarnac� Gah ' � "� ' Sldin9 3AIn9k Na Pipe UnIH Trlm-TiN Flcta � � � � ' IM{dma� Shnt S:ed T tj C Gas Radiaron Stoe�, V/eed, 6rk• ' C�libmb YN'� 4idln9 Elec. Neatan . �pau{c� Baced � � Ow�llin9 � �de KnoftwPiee BW�er Furoac�dl� . �tt�9� Vertieaf Sidi�q ibor Fumaea� DE flN1S�N . . . ' Fxfery Phstcr on iit� �'✓aU Hiaten (�i �{er Sand. Iu�y � � � Ch�rch Acbofos Sidinq Vmftlatinq S�a. Gdotea � SbH ' . � Seheol Brkk V�new Washad A6 - p��.�ard . . . Gan9� Corrt9�fod Imn Rdri9. Ah H.►. Inferb� Shao . ` Bam FlatGaH.lron PLUMBING / Ph-� K�wMp PW � . � � � �� Fram�, SNeI Na. ef iixWm �P Pan�Oad . � Pou1M Navw fram«J'Ted� W�IIa TIn1, P�per CheaD Gted �. .. - Aufo Ceeet ROOF � MMius� SVKial Pai4✓ SaMfar� . BatA Untmkh . - � BY119]�O�I �.OYK �� j(l �t� fs q'j WOOQ�Wr� P� , ' .. Mt 'Studie Hly� Monifor Til¢ Fleer I I�I Omauu�ntai' • t � Aperfm�nf Wbles Dormm �NO �/� I • . . ' Unib • 5�ed " Cuf-uD BUILT-INS � . � Arw y'+ Unif � Coppn jhip9{� TilsTeim I I 1 F��Rator .. ' � • Raew gh�kn Gawl Til< Walls I I�I Et�c.. Gs, lu � " - . ,' . . I . ` Sheef SMI Sbt Neighf � � 1. Bnffd Beokuf�a, . Corru9afW Imm S heM�r PateM leds /\ . � FlatGaW.lron Cedat CbftFS - . - � FOUNDATIQN Comqasition Ovn Tub 1 I 1 y gpndy �1 . � 'Gncretf8�lchCompoSninylt � StaU I T ( . . � Nillsid� �� Sfone Tiix-Trwn '.` Tile Walb i� I. � Q S . . 2rao Walia Woe �'i Sm. L9�.. . I f i � � . Ttnl7ei�h i � � � y� q;ll � . Glass D'.. I I I' CLASSIFI TION i . . . B4SEMENT � M d Stetl T.fvto Tile h1Yn ! I I � . ' ffet : Chap eM. R+N � yf��t ■ Q.valiy • -. LIGH7ING M -i " � - . /� fM A�K . . � ChuV Gaed Gen : . ' .. O �. K. /�.: D Mediu�5oec(il S � _ . . CA�<k Rnita�l B � � I 3 BUILDING VALUES ' . . .. ', livin9 Remn � ILI I �'w � I C/J liOl ' . � � e.a.��. � � � 2� • �: swrv k� d � 3 � �- . . Dreuin9 0.m. I I � I A} f 2'� I' 3�� I 3��•I �. ' i latAroam , �I I I I V+ - .. � l / Bramnt � .�� I 1 . � � . " Ne Tub I VaN� _ ' ' Tib 1 I I I I �• Val e� I I I KRah�n ' � � I GarN� I I I ' . l ht. R m N.I I I I V.m� . • . . � `Piank 1 1 Outbulla- . I I I Mdwd Flaen I I I I i^9s Valu� . � Ndwd. Deen � I I I I . I !. � . Hdad. FIn6h i �. . ' . P. 4 brl Dah I% Iv.c v.i. r�t•� /6d O I��I2�9a � . Valu� . RerieMm I I l I . Valu� i - � 1 �Sp�e.I�Creciated�qssmwd Spac.I�V�isfedlA�t�wd ' . ' � � YurlDtpr.VDepr.l Value I Value earlD<Dr.ID Valua I Vaiw � . •y l I li�� l�� 1 i I I ; ttb o I I f/ .I I I I ! . �'I11,� I li� ' � I L I I j . �qs�.14�11 1�3�sl/�s� 1 I I I' � � I Y•/ol I�cu I�' I I I � �� I lii�l•�_ I� �• i,I I I I I I I I I I � � � ! �.�..:•�_:_ --�.: �� COUNTY OF LG3 Ai...��c.: + vrri..c OF ASSESSUH , �'� � �. 500 �NEST TEMPLE ST., LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 ASSESSOR MISCELLANEOUS RE�EIPT No. 6gg61 =—� DATE �_ ' �,� � - ' flECE1VED FROM . r v\ C�,) ^ _\ 1 r ( � f , z S . _ C�� 1 r� r �.. S,x S � DOLLARS ' .voa - MAPS(SCALE) @ � . . MAPS (FICHE COP1� @ . ' � AOLL PAGES @ I �. . , CRT �PRINT OUT � j . � �- I � . ' . OTHER'. � . I 1� ( I � t�l J l� , y TOTAL o . Z ' . y < TELEPHONE NO. - . I S�GNATURE � � r WHITE-CUSTOMER � YELIOW-FILE � PINK-ALCOUNTING T'Yt='E= L�D HOU,iE tJC= :�';?`i�''rS STREET= SA�! tiT�li;E�l1"E� ;i:'�Y/STATE= FILE. N0= �i ii'r'i?F7'i e.= r�^i ; h;'L-'.o ,'.�A i E= 0�!f ?!�'�. ASSR ID N� RE� CC USC ZO�:E VC REC DT TfiF PF;IC� 8 QC; CC2 D7 INT UFiC � 65 4f C��i {i`i =, 6 9�3 144vb t}._;�;:i? L.YR3 K 8zi(�303—SU i°> i SU�:; 1 � 5 Y i? :�%-�J A t�Ai4E AND ST_�TU� ��C�fiE::S REYES, CEt�lEYL�A i�?q :' i :i�y�! VIt�lCEi�! i E Ab+E �Y�!Wft'i,� ;,FL.IF SUBF'ART ��IGa Yfi EFF NC; OF NO D� i�!�'. OF SG �' CC1�fF'll��??E kF_Y TYF'F_. CLASS £:LT Yfi UNITS BDR�'iS RATH� itiAi�'! SIyUAfiE F' - Oi i'?:'_ �7�'��7 59 59 2 2 i 4R8 0<ii2 (�7S 1�� i45C 44 44 1 2 i 8'E'� ° TOTpL TQl"HL TfiF F'ftICE TftF F'R]:CE HVu �G� FT I3�SE '�HLUE F'G RG Lj'i � llNIT�' S� rT P�fi U�?S? F'E'r: S� FT F�F; l��!IT I_F��:D 3�r;u�� T �'? ,?, �'?�� 5�v�ti� vu ?•54 It':F' S52UG ; 37 L.A�l�� L.AI'd� i1"AT_:�� ?p7 f-.;_ t��Sin?�;t ',1]:D7H I:�EF'TH �>ia � T r i��F{EJ � �i �,'1 �' i'r . _ ......_.._ .... . _. _.... _....._. . . ...___...__...... . ...._ .............. .. ................ ... . ...._._... ._.__,._ ............_. . ..�_ , ... . � ^ • � . � ' � �rm% .�...�oFd �" o ° ltS� O �� . . ' . . . a •� ��tiv iz o � 33 � R ALMA AV£, �i ,� „ . .p ��a iisoz �s 3` �icoz �� `�c � 9 iza.vz inzc. � BL A. . ALMA > � ACATfO—AL�E � S o� � z i aa �� . oro 5 O ^� i7 ��o!.�r.5'.o.y fs i2o.as ��. . Y o � o . ' - 90 i � B7 � h j //6 ' ' 2 � _—_ _� • oYO � � � � /OVO3.. ��?_� g 3/ 9 Qb. o�.57e � 1 � Q 4� YY �� 090 , $ � IU 'I e �41 � , b � . io o b —�0 6/ � es � h — so-- q� iif o. Q ro iov� �9-; � — /04 ° . 7f.Y / 742 . . � 9�/ �/ `�io f A_S5 62 BO �4L—" 09 � z st a a7 � a7 •� �� - � 7�� ioi°� �os�n�_ �c9 Q �, _ � _ �0 .d l _ -- ., io� �z ° 's" • `l °� � Niac � sJia9�f l 6e BI � � �— . �Z iS� ,e��Y �e9 � o� g/ • R R � ' -�— � o . �o � . ' a �� 13 � �7g �' 'Y�S � /D O 093/ •,e P ° />�30 � � � 3/ > �� BL A � . , � 3 22 � . , a yr-- . � ' � — i°° ° � � o ! o �Y � 1 �" I R 50'Of) _. �d` '� � 6� . 96 /P9 • J2� i 1 � � 4ot1 .� ' � 3 G W l� • I a r,5`�. __ � .' ioag m�v e jb O � 2pieiv j 39� C9/a433 2 6B I09Y0 � e 97 p7 ;= S M. ��o� � Z . ' . .Ydb'Je'dM ` , iia I� � � . � , t . . , . � y�j . . . , n R v / v 1 . � ra�i �� I O " / / Z C ` h O'11 J ,. m w O ' '1 � O \ . r . Q J . N� •/ N, 2 0� D 1 �� O �. p ^� w w A A. ~ q q O O O O O� N N N O ^I 9. O FRK�T/O� A� Q B O � y� 'O A � ]S �y (�P�� rl � M `"� � f o 5�� 7 V — � . 4 � a • S� "o G.p ax So ' F _ / � ,° Aq TON AVE. � " w Ci o /MPER/AL °. o � Q � n nss 3a4�s ..t.f � S�.P .u�. , �. . � // o � �b �� D� r � , q IO r � , • r Ip `� � t � YB. N �f� � 9� A7 1� _ 4D s � h M �`f h�` �� \ � 4 V q 4�4 O O� M♦ . � � u,\ � �.� � � q � � � 0 50' � � 2 0 � J " n.n 8 � V ' o uoiS�..,: � � 4� :�5 )io . •"+ s �� , D �1Cf� E 'fg N'"� P �p t0 n 2 � u,.�q4 C O ;. ':y. B6 � 0 3 �s � h , O . '.� `S S . z ' 'p � < t0 3 � O ,+..e�o $ ��ipi o o /R BS oi7 � � �iy . ° ,� � � '1 ' �ii �s� � h 9 �� 3B � � �J 3 � � � . �e2 � b . /�. i � � �odc;3. � t�u � . . . � . 53�6 N g �`+5� ( I ,8 2j ioi /,°r's P, y � � e - o � 2 �oii � �4q > uo3l - - �� $� � �Q 2� , iio ��a /O/ 0 . �io`�� a M b ' o TR NQ 39/ ,� $ i�o „ oo � 0 z uoa � ` `� ? Q °i /40 f 4 ��la � � � i �'G� ,� MB7/}/,7 ��227 ��(/T,9 � �y N�IOyS i Yo>4 . _ . . n � V ^I $ � BO 110`Ij Yil�yye � IP�' ��`�'o .,. ��' N P ' e 2i � � iie i . i ° "' V " �l►� �''�� 9 �� t e ao'' SE p �o� . � o� a, �° ��E s �o � � y � =�x N W � . . � QT J P q '.. i ,� v �I fi o � I , �� o � '1' li� h - Z J�� . � �Ir �V „ �� . �� g h �° � � a g , s y . , ,°° so . . . . �, i . � . ' . .� . .. . � - i - � . . . ... � . . . .. . � , . _ . .. . ; . . � , , �. ,� . , - ( � � � � i . � � � _ - ��f'.O-� �l-?� �c r' ;-� . � E�isTa . a.,��,�„I'., ��czlP��f� ` �-1' 3 ��f� : 1 1� �,�-r-�E , ,, i o�7 � ��I vi�L-F:..i ,. �::: _ i3-o ��2 �n�r(S v-G L�I�O�. . ' .�.Pa. , - � �oP��.� �+-r�o.I �J � u. _ M 1�� 'r�cEFz EXiS P,�G� �Gi�I W I LL R.� �'(O ` EN�� IS'( l.-��/�tJC.r � �iOr'f � WILL 1��0'f F�' � I � �d Pa�Z.f,(t�� 1-Of�D G� � I _ . ��.� EG'� FFOf�{'-'f`t', y - � �3'-0' , ,� 6-0 Z I E7�15'TL� � �` rloc.l� � � ` �z' I _ / 0 PI=c �; 55 _cp� rn-,�-��oz.l Gl-Jr�F�: �EtbG R�� . 10971 � �t`L�!.�1; , � i � I,`ti� 1-.10G1�, GF� - �� --3 /�+7.� F-- �2�3) (�3� GGI,Y(Pr�'�; DUNr�� I,� �t'�I,�r? S �15 �'� ��!�'i.� s�V Pi�o f I�Ef=�'. . (�i3) ��+' � � �� 7 � �� yi�Er1 � � � �. _'�--�e�_. ��.�_�_.��_,_ ---�- P�D�fh� I�c�a�rl Krfu�Et� - 9��3`' , j� � �� D�t,I��I( _ . _, � uvirl� Rcori , ��J�YL�` RE !� � � I� x � � � I��/I�r�-fE �� f �Y�WOG� i • . , / �/ / � ��s �E'�''' �. I�� .1��5 ' iz°x i�° L1. /� ib�� 9 s8s s�U�'tJ A�/ (�GU Ri u�P� Zi3 ��12-ZSOa 26'-6'� t�� FLOGR- �¢t�I x��F= /s"= i -o' J � • � ' � �. �;� - I - • � l- . C�f �`(li'L�1 b �� _V r � . �.PU��{ �IE�bP RE S � � � � �►� v��J�r� �-Y�,I�•.toop 213 - 975� �� L�NHILL' 1?,l)ILDEI � 5 Q5 �-�1.�`v�r�� A�/, _,._...,,, � _- _ ._. .�. _ PIGG Rw v�F y Zi3� 9�42- Zsov 1' ��, r� ►�T �t.ov� �hJ �CLE: /B��ll��d .. .� . � ! � � r F �[ ' , �� 13�'XIO W . : s" ' � �� r� �cor� Q ��° � x � ax vi�.l�rlra " - o � . u � �inl��Jc,, _ . u.�,rlu � S ��° ( EtJE`fp�' (LE-�S i�'X��• �� `^ti�=Er.�'(E i,ti�� •100[7 00 � C�3 I —9`757 ° +1ir�e.lf ; : y � DI�t�J�'�II.L P�hLL�PS � 95P5 51.1-`U��I .A�/, F�u��, �l� R�vEr?.�* i3 xio 2i3— ��12-2Spl� � ts�T,� � � n 25 -o ��/`i��D FI,DOF�- �.D�t�� . ' �CG�LE' %tb''c I'_p�' RESOLUTION NO. 2267 �� A RESOLUTION OF TAE PLANNING CONIIvIISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING PARKING VARIANCE NO. 2 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10971 SAN VICENTE AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, pursuant to law, conduct a public hearing on a proposed parking Variance, for certain property located at 10971 San Vicente Avenue, Lynwood, California; , ' and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood has considered evidence presented by the applicant and the Community Development Department staff at the public hearing with respect to the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exemgt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended; and NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby approves the application for a parking variance for the subject property based on the following findinqs: 1. The three residential units are legal nonconforming buildings that had been built with only three one-car garages. 2. That the subject lot is substandard with no room to provide three additional parking as required by the , City's Zoning Code. 3. Granting the Variance application is consistent with the City's General Plan and Section 25-26 of the zoning ordinance regarding nonconforming buildings. 4. Granting this variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Section 2. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of March, 1989, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:; AYES: NOES: ABSENT: • ABSTAIN: Donald Dove, Chairman ~ � � J DISK 41:RES02267 1 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: • Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney 2 �t . � ;',� DATE: March 14, 1989 ,4'� '�<F ` �" !' t�. ,_, a� �.� � lu'�.�� ` TO: PLANNING COMMISSION � .,:-.;- .. � - i�, ��_ �'::�. I t�N� N�• Y EROM: Vicente L.� Mas, Director � • Community Development Department" • SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 20792 - CASE NO. TPM3 Applicant(s): Nathaniel Roberson PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map (No. 20792) for the purpose of consolidating one and three quarter (1 • 3/4) lots into a single lot in order to build twenty six (26) apartment units in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone at 4440 Olanda Avenue, Lynwood, CA. FACTS 1. Source of Authority. Section 25-18, et seq., Subdivision Regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act, • Government Code Section 66410, et seq. 2. Property Location. ' ' The subject parcels are located on the east side of Olanda � Avenue between Atlantic and Cookacre Avenues and if consolidated, will measure at approximately twenty nine thousand six hundred and seventy six and one half (29,676.6) square feet. 3. Existina Land Use , The parcels are relatively flat and vacant with the following , surrounding land uses:. North - Multi-Family East - Medium Commercial . South - Two-Family/ West - Two-Family Medium Commercial 4. Land Use Desianation. . The General Plan designation for the property is Mu1ti-Family Residential and the zoning classification is R-3 with the following surrounding land uses. General Plan Zonin North - Multi-Family R-3' - South - Townhouse Cluster Housing/ Medium Commercial C East - Controlled Business District CB1 West - Townhouse & Cluster Housing R-,2 5. "Site Plan Review. At its regular meeting on February "23, 1989, the Site Plan Review Committee recommended Planning Commission approval. DISK 36: TPM3 . 1 I , � ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION c� r�nvironmental Assessment. The Community Development Department has determined that the project could.not have a significant effect on the environment. , Therefore a Categorical Exemption has been prepared, in accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended, (Section 15073). Staff analysis of this proposal include the following findinqs: (a) Design of the proposed site; and (hl Consistency of the proposed site with the General Plari. Desian of the proposed site consolidation a. The design of the proposed lot consolidation shows the consolidated lots to be in character with existing residential developments in the area. ' b. The proposal consists of inerginq one and three quarters (1 3/4) lots in order to form a 29,676.6 sq. ft. parcel to allow construction of twenty six (26) apartment units. c. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of the development, in that the parcels are - substantially flat and able to support the type of development that is proposed. Consistencv of the site with the General Plan a. Staff's inspection shows the site to be compatible with the City of Lynwood's General Plan as the General Plan limits land use activities to those projects that enhance the function and quality of residential developments without altering significantly the character of the existing environment. b. The size and location of the proposed project does not significantly change the character of the existing � environment. , c. The proposed consolidation is consistent with the Zoning '� classification of R-3 and the General Plan designation of Multi-Family Residential. RECONIl�lENDATION ( S ) : �. Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No 2269. 1. Finding that Tentative Parcel Map No. 20792, Case No. 3, 'will not have a significant effect on the environment and certify the Negative Declaration as adequate. 2. Approving Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 3, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. Attachments: 1. Location Map ` 2. Tentative Parcel Map No. 20792 3. Resolution No. 2269 DISK 36:TPM3 Z � LOCATION MAP . � � � �Z:'_' lLl__� � �L_" i" __:a�_!•1C � � a i. - tr i � a 3 �---'n ---- i i 4 . 1 �t � y 4 . I` I` 1•jlt_. Lij I r.� ` Z ., � 1r7T� �I i w � ' , � - SEE � � �� + I I = 1 L_WJt_ M : I �� 6 i e i 4 �: '' j , I i�� ; i i � �' � � , � ,. , , . .,. f� tr .. AVENUE "� .; �a. � � ►r �� ''�� .w � c :o '� � �2 y I f.�ry n u • c ,, . E� SE r �r �♦ I �� • f .( 7_V o �� t. 7! J J , : : v �--�-- � : � ; � , �U�ypO ,. ,� ,�9 � � �j r � � . 3 Z : a ., � '> n_ � � W , i � . . ' . �� . � t_� GJ- � . o �: L; Q ..« u •s. �' r ' ��.' �� : i• , � v ''."r` • a , P �a. i-'�e�__' �. n 9� !� '� • , 'l. 4 �i �' � 4q ; .� � i T 4 w �» .v �l � t' � � rI« � i � .la'l�' ;`C, vr ' 4 � �s. ,,' I � e t �.. 1 .. w a ti � � ,r •. Z � i !/ i * � K � . , 1� � . � �„ a�, !, > °•'„ i'v• y' � N ' ; "r p � i-- �--'t i Q -�.. :� � J� ., r ;"� �----- � � • , ; ;__—��, ' ,� �, ; 4 c4, QOjy F - lf � � � �► � . , 1 t �� t � ... r � ,� a a,,.� �� j �, +. > sl �' � j b . ;w. �i �� .. � . q ' '1 � �� ! l/ ��'Y�� ;� � ^'' , V�. � n r �° S� � .,,� � � " . � 4 � � J e � ,.. � , � � �r , A �1. � I �� ! �/� `* u}• � . $' 4 �� p it W . •�� ,.. BLOUN �� a � � '� k '�'�� ,�''s� � � _ ��u '� � 0 4 � • � � Q � � � �� S� •' �5 scur �. cd � ��• . Y K � a � � �•' " � { � �;^ e F O � ' �r V (�'/I �� , �� J1'*AY 1 O - I �./6� .n �n � -p � I/ � ' � d:, � � �� y P o n �. � ;� s i �:4�( :r O . � �ry � ^' ^. � N' 4 � I � ^` n ��' I'~ �.1 �~ ^ �� r �',� v 1, • � . • OLANUA ' N pP " ` 2" '� ? ` `,� � °� r '�i E y a � � y.. � b . ry- C J '�.. � L` • Id� ��,� , ° ;�•�' . �i > .Z��1 N �' \ If� ^ �• � N �.. il' ! t n\ i• � �; �1•fi b��?.?1u1�. .,.-r � : K . ^ 4 71 1' � 8F7q � � ,, t., , � -+ t ,u � 1 ,. ,. ' cr � �. � ,y�� ,��b '� � �,� � �; ?� 1 rt� e/ �� r� �` ��B F T ��o 0 1�� T s�' . ? V6 N � E � , � . � ' r �, � �,�, z :.,, �� A . , . � r,[,�- , a � � � ro i�� ' v� ?i , � O r. ` ` T � : e Fa Ji - �DN Z y��3� ___-a___� � '�i>^ �;,�-? � �� . e� n�rL Y'' ••- Li: n Jt ; T T�, � 1 • N , ��, i1 t '{ 11� 1 ' , Lw /7LS0; 0 " �� T I �� w��a G`a �J __„ _� . �--- ��N��( �` �•d � a� d �- � , �� j�� . � , t i7w �? ` I7�31C M �ii , a �� A� w , � '"� '°� M� ? ?1 �l �'�s: ��• •y pi � � q/1 1. � ��w � w W � n •�n1 "P r t__� �i• Ili�i �I I ll'!rJ V �f ��. °.�i�ML�e =2`� a 1 � �Qlv'� 1 �� j 1 � r` � ucJt� i2oJ9= -- '� � t 'Y/37 0 � � '�' t�-�:-`i.S' r o .��. � ? 1 7 !2 i�C �"' � �. ' � j� �b �°`!�y +F`� . �,� 0 W _' t'! � . f� 1�' � �.-� i a F � �. � O � �• i �i711'� �� 3 7�' � Z 1 .•� y1 M!� � a� - � � __fYx_J�". � U �l)Iq� ( Q a ^ C �.�1.�- ii., 1 ? � J n�iP a �u1L�` Q i _J ' �ria� v . a J h-- ,� . I)�� »n � ~b� C`�` � � : �irro w�)� y i , Q laf�'/ l •,,� r � s : J�ilr `'��` � U. � '�a�ai :��Y�� MM ` Cy a�_ , ' •/d"y � ' T : , 1 �rD � ' . qlie� � 0 ;♦ � 11 � , ', , � M , �Y, T � , ' ��+?; ;, �C� �� .� � �. � . I " � �1 i —_ j ;. RESOLUTION NO. 2269 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL _ MAP NO. 20792 T0 COMBINE A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 6 AND PORTIONS OF LOT 15, TRACT NO. 7099, AS RECORDED SN BOOK 101, PAGES 6 AND 7 OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA KNOWN AS 4440 OLANDA AVENUE , LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application and; � WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered all pertinent testimony offered in the case as presented at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended; and WHEREAS, the preparation, filing and recordation of Parcel Map is required for the proposed residential development; and Section 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that said Tentative Parcel Map No. 20792 should be approved for the following reasons: A. The combination of lots meet all the applicable requirements and conditions imposed by the State Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code. B. The proposed combination of lots is consistent with the applicable elements of the General Plan and the Official Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lynwood. C. Proper and reasonable provisions have been made for adequate ingress and egress to the lots being combined. D. Proper and adequate provisions have been made for all public utilities and public services, including sewers. E. The proposed lot combination will not cause any substantial environmental impact and a Negative Declaration has been prepared. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 20792 in the R-3 (Multi- Family) zone, subject to the following conditions. • Disk 36:Reso2269 1 Community Development Department *�. �, The applicu:.t :�:zall :�eet the requirements of all other City Departments. 2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a . Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, before any building permits are issued. Plannina Division 3. within twenty-four (24) months after approval or conditional approval of the Tentative Parcel Map, the subdivider shall file with the City of Lynwood, a Final Map in substantial conformance with the Tentative Parcel Map as approved or conditionally approved, and in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Lynwood. 4. No grading permit or building permit shall be issued prior to recordation of final map with the office of the Los Angeles County Recorder. 5. Extension of the Tentative Map approval shall only be considered if the applicant or his/her representative, submits a written request for extension to the Community Development Department stating the reasons for the request, at least thirty (30) days before map approval is due to expire, pursuant to, and in compliance with, Section 25-18, of the subdivision regulations of the City of Lynwood. 6. The Final Parcel Map shall be filed with the City Engineer of the City of Lynwood. Department of Public Works/Enaineering Conditions 7. All conditions of the State Map Act and the City's subdivision Ordinance must be met prior to recordation. All matters and improvements shall be consistent with the ordinances, standards, and procedures of the City's Development Standards, Engineering Procedures and Standards, Water Standards, and Planting Standards of the Department of Parks and Recreation. The Developer is responsible for checking with staff for clarification of these requirements. 8. Submit a Subdivision Guarantee to this office. The final map shall be based on record data. All surveying for the proposed development will be done by the Developer, including the establishment of centerline ties. Enclose with the final map the surveyor's closure sheets. 9. Developer shall pay all applicable development fees including drainage, sewer, water and parkway trees prior to issuance of any building permits. Pay Parcel Map checking fee prior to checking. Disk 36:Reso2269 2 ` Pay $100.00 monument checking fee prior to recordation. LeHosic'' $50.00 with City Eng�neer to guarantee receipt by City�bf recorded, reproducible mylar, parcel map prior to recor3ation. All special assessments and utilities or sewer conhection fees are to be paid prior to recording the final map. All requirements to the serving utilities to be met or guarantee prior to recording of the final map. 10. Gradincr and Draining A gradinq plan signed by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted for the approval of the Director of Community Development. The grading plan shall include the topography of all contiguous properties and streets and shall provide for the methods of drainage in accordance with all applicable City standards. Retaining walls and other protective measures may be required. Offsite drainage easements may be necessary. The structural section of all parking areas shall be designed by a Civil Engineer based upon soils analysis supplied by a recognized Soils Engineer and approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. In the event that the design is not provided, the minimum structural section that will be approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer would be 2 inches of asphalt on 4 inches on untreated rock base. Submit to this office a Geoloqic/Soils Report signed by a Registered Soils Enqineer. 11. Sewers The development shall be provided with public sewers. Connect to public sewer. Provide laterals as necessary. Design of all sanitary sewers shall be approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 12, water Svstems The Developer shall construct a water system including water services, fire hydrants and appurtenances through the development as required by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. The Developer shall submit a water system plan to the City of Lynwood Fire Department for fire hydrant locations. The City will install water meters only. Payment for said meters shall be made to the City prior to issuance of building permits. The Developer shall install on-site water facilities including stubs for water meters and fire hydrants on interior and on boundary arterial streets. All conditions of the Lynwood Fire Department must be met prior to recordation. 13. Public Easements Riqht-of-Way Where drainage, sewer and other such easements are required, the minimum easement width shall be ten (10) feet to facilitate maintenance unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. Dedicate a five (5) foot wide strip of property along Cookacre Avenue and Olanda Street to accomodate a radius. Disk 36:Reso2269 3 , ` 14. Sidewalks Design, configuration and locations shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, and the Director of Community Development. Ramps for physically handicapped persons shall be provided both on- � site and off-side as required by State and local regulations. 15. . Dust Control and Pedestrian Safety � Prior to the issuance of demolition or grading permits, the . developer shall: a. Submit a plan indicating safety methods to be provided to maintain safe pedestrian ways around all areas of construction. This may require proper and adequate - signs, fences, barricades, or other approved control devices as required by the Director of Community Development. 1 Developer shall install all public improvements, as required by the Director of Public Works/City. Engineer prior to issuance of any occupancy permits for this development. Public Improvements shall include but are not limited to: a. Reconstruction of damaged PCC sidewalk along Atlantic Avenue and Olanda Street. b. Construction of new PCC sidewalk along Cookacre Avenue in conjunction with street widening. c. Reconstruction of damaged PCC curb and gutter along Atlantic Avenue and Olanda Street. d. Construction of new PCC curb and gutter along Cookacre Avenue in conjunction with street widening. _ and Beechwood Avenue. e. Construction` of new pavement along Cookacre Avenue in conjunction with street widening. f. Construction of two (2) wheelchair ramps at northwest corner of Olanda and Atlantic and at northeast corner of olanda and Cookacre. g. Installing marbelite street lights with underground services and conduits. Install one light on Atlantic and one on olanda street. h. Planting eight (8) parkway tree (24" Box) along Atlantic, Cookacre and Olanda Street. i. Construct (2) tree wells with covers along Atlantic. j. Underground all utilities. • k. Prepare street improvement plans to match proposed dedication along cookacre. 1. Reconstruct existing catch hasin to accomodate proposed wideninq. Prepare storm drain plans and obtain approval from L.A.C.F.D. New catch basin shall be of the side opening type. DISK 36: RES02269 4 i � m. Submit 15 copies of final map to Public Works Division R after approval of Tentative Map. Also, submit two (2) copies of preliminarv subdivision guarantee and engineering calculations. 17. All changes and repairs in existing curbs, gutters, and ^ sidewalks and.other public improvements shall be paid for by the developer. If improvements are to be guaranteed, a faithful performance bond shall be posed by the develo�er to guarantee installation of said public improvements and aa agreement for completion of improvements with the City Council shall be entered into. Submit Policy 3nsurance or bond protecting City against damage or injury to persons or property growing out of, related to, or resulting from improvements or work. The Director of Public Works/City Engineering before commencing any improvements, a sum estimated by the Director of Public Works/City Enginesr to cover cost of inspection of all improvements under his jurisdiction. Section 3: A copy of Resolution No. 2269 with the conditions shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 14th day of March 1989, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: � NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Donald A. Dove, Chairperson - APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney • Disk 36:Reso2269 5 i - . �. � , , , � �. ,,,,�, • :r . ' � : . � � �r :/. .�'�� . ' � ! . ... . . . . .� . DATE: March 14, 1989 /� -°'F`1 � I�` N�• . `� . � ' `r��1c�i ��V. Tp: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Directoz , Community Development Department SUBJECT: TENTATZVE PARCEL MAP NO. 20790 - CASE NO. TPM4 Applicant(s): `George Polycrates PROPOSAL• ' The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel l9ap (No. 20790) for the purpose of consolidating five parcels, and the ` portion of another at the northeast corner of Bullis Road and Century Boulevard in the C-2 (General Co�nercial) zone. d ' FACTS i 1. Source of AuthoritY. � I Section 25-18, et seq., Subdivision Requlations of the Lynwood Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act, Government Code Section 66410, et seq require that a parcel map be recorded for the consolidation of several lots into a single parcel. 2. Property Location. ' The subject parcels are located on the northeast corner of the Century Blvd, and Bullis Road intersection.(Refer to attached Location Map.) and is measured at approximately 50,965:2 square feet. 3. Existing Land Use . The site is currently developed with an existing commercial building that is vacant, and is surrounded by the following land uses: North - Commercial Parking East - Commercial South - Commercial/Civic Center west - Commercial 4. Land Use Desianation. The General Plan designation for the property is Commercial; I the zoning classification is C-2 (General Commercial). I The surrounding land use designations are as follows: General Plan Zonin North - Commercial P ' South - Commercial � ' East - Commercial � West - Commercial CB-1 � 6. Site Plan Review. At its regular meeting on February 23, 1989, the Site Plan �-'"' Review Committee recommended Planning Commission approval �--v...subject to the conditions in ihe attached resolution. _ DISK 36; TPM4 1 ! }. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION ,; Envirorunental Assessment. �. The Community Development Department has determined that the project could not have a significant effect ott the environment. Therefore, a Notice of Exemption has been prepared and is on file in the Community Development Department and the office of the City Clerk. ' Staff .analysis of this proposed lot consolidation include the following findings: (a) Design of the proposed site; and (b) Consistency o£ the proposed site with the General Plan. Design of the proposed site consolidation a. The design of the proposed lot consolidation shows the consolidated lots to be in character with existing Commercial developments in'the area. b. The proposal is meant for the consolidation of five lots and the portion of another and thus allowing better utilization of the property. - c. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of the development permitted by the General Plan and zoning in that the parcels are substantially flat and able , to support the type of development proposed. Consistency of the site with the General Plan I a. Staff's inspection shows the site to be compatible with the City of Lynwood's General Plan as the General Plan limits , , land use activities to those projects that enhance the I function and guality of residential developments without altering significantly the character of the existing environment. b. The size and location of the proposed project does not significantly change the character of the existing environment. c. The proposed consolidation is consistent with the Zoning classification of C-2 and the General Plan designation of Commercial. RECOMMENDATION(S): . ' Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2270. , 1. Finding that Tentative Parcel Map No. 20790, Case No. 4, will not have a significant effect on the environment and is therefore exempt. 2. Approving Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 4, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. ' - Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Tentative Parcel Map No. 20790 3. Resolution No. 2270 . DISK 36:TPM4 2 : -- _ -- iL�CATION MAP � � � �� iw 76�.,r6R R ♦i - ib R -'.: ""' -_� _.. _' n ._ _ . � � �� . � � i� is iaa pp�. er ` tr�O Y� zs ze� :�, ` g io �a o � R �!u (o " �" ` '�.ac, �,v� - M � . � . � � . `"I . � - � .�I . .� . o : � _ M . � . � � �� ' '�i i i' 7LE SAGf � �, uoaf W /I l08� . � . . .- . �sa u o . ..do se � /O7 70 � . 47Q /S � � Q v � � • . � d0 . � SO • !i �i � �rl a �c. �c O a � � �Yt`f0p e Q IItY /lIl4 p �14� a Q a� 72 6K Se.� � rv� J ..�nk�� 1T/ ', PSO t/a ?/e$ 117V � - 1� ; .ia/D(o �s , p : �+ ae Y ia � b �. � � � � � � �. , ��' j ��'I' g45 � 39efr �3 2 J � ��o � saes . . . � E° " ` ��60� ,(� ,�.i iov �D �li 49 iJ so.�z sa � so i3a�n tu n uz�iai�n ��o� �� Q �J ii,,� y �JD� iz��y� � li)o " p' i��r-w� e , � .01 / bo) . /P6o] /36.0 . uJ v $�0 � . . s e r s < � : � o : a < � � s . j5 „�' ' ,� � �. /20.0) /P6.C] � IY60) /Z6O] p � n � p� �7 n m � � ��azzJ �. � 2 l0 ] f�. ' °^ .iii � ri ; y si b �� ,„ ze� zee mo :ao �zni zaz zai za� zcs � a � � li 3� �� ?.� . T zzg � ?�' r�""� I �O // ' )/ � O O I /O � I�1 /! � � / _ . �, a. o-� �� ,^ � i a !e �P ers 39 J �`I ;.u.r J �0��0 , e� I �3. s pf.�, y r �� •�j. us � es . �..� r. e RN � s ' /fjRC � Y .ro 4 •; � 50[v 30 5 � ��!�� 2 , y • . . . . . . �. . � ] 9 �J�g ° � .n o , ae � � � ss� � � �i � i � � u4 �i � - �� M� ��'�� ,�q � . .�//e 67 . 56 6 . � � I� I � � � 2 '� ^ 6 H I � I I / 2B0 2)➢ 270 ' 1)1 ,y 3 �j 2 3�4 � ♦ ' "' „. � 6 6 y J7 S P� I I ., � : Y o •^� 2j O e ,zs.�, �:. . � � � �� I � I' . �l R . � �, ^ - ��I I I I � i .i ' Ixe � � 1 . 6 ' 65 � zc oe ��i' : 3 ize.ov i � 6 � ,� ; �� il I � I �ill' sss $ 4� �qe�4 � �a �s 2j � �"O i s o ^�� ti 2> A ,��/ � � - -b � l� ^{� ` 2)? �` � I Diro'°z`", o CENTURY s'"' �4 qqa��' �ti � " 6! ns:m a.cv. y SQQf SO .. . . SO W fi�� 6� � ST 4 � \ .` . I "�� /2/ ez � ° Iy� / / m F � 6�' 'e�R. . /26.0> �v6A) �) L: 00 q O � � / . . q in � nc ns ni io az ui ii ��os io �� q 6 ,� Bp `. Fv /i3$ M1 , '� � � - V.nC JE —d CE ie!re b „� , � � 699 SO • ' . 9/ v� �� D6� � U O - ' - ^ � � iJG.]6 � ii � :~ - � �!. . -_. . . 30 1J99 �� qi4 � b �0 '�°. oi "� D7 N ! . � h , yq'� i� y y /�� ' � b //! //D RO /2/ /2] /23 /2/ /75 /16 /U // dY a� � // .. h � g � o e b � m Q h D� � a � '8 � 3i� . � . . � ' Y' m � � � N � °� //33�qe� �oi � � � i ' j� D� y �<�r� b '� �i � � 95z So � " So .�av i! 340 �' 3/ o � P i ' . � SOQE3 � /00 $� Y � h j �� , f �, . ' 2'��o y �. m sa 3 � �ie Y�� . � . � u ia<G v� . . � b y iary � .�sv3 _ ��i a � . y� . ioz ' � ee x � �oo � % . 2' � �„ - . � . . . Q d�y v34q�� i � i/, � � . m W � �.P�`� e � $ $ ° '�°� a - S �H�� h CiTV ' � oi ' ee59. , i� s"8 $ /�Q . � � KK _. _ _ - . �� j n ize • iosPO, : e 5 � //36� '!� • � • eo a. m � � /06 ' ei � J / d j �y // �. J , V .` � � J � � L� u� ��rco _ /i{Qg � v� . ii.v�c .. . . . . � � _/ .' � ' . �..�� , �+..-��"- . ....�,-c.r".'".�":.. .. �As� n�o r�M 4 � RESOLUTION NO. 2270 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNZNG COMMISSSON OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 20790 TO COMBINE LOT 281 EXCEFT THE EASTERZ.Y 23 FEET, SIX (6) INCHES THEREOF LOTS 282 THROUGH 286, INCLUSIVE, OF TRACT NO. 15A16; AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 315, PAGES 40 TO 45 OF MAPS, IN THE OFfiICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered all pertinent testimony offered in the case as presented at the public hearing; and . WHEREAS, the preparation, filing and recordation of Parcel Map - is required for development; and Section 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that said Tentative Parcel Map No. 20790 should be approved for the following reasons: A. The combination of lots meet all the applicable requirements and conditions imposed by the State ' Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code. B. fihe proposed combination of lots is.consistent with the ' applicable elements of the General Plan and the , Official Zoning Ordinance of the City. of Lynwood.• , C. Proper and reasonable provisions have been made for � adequate ingress and egress to the lots being combined. D. Proper and adequate provisions have been made for all public utilities and public services, including sewers. E. The proposed lot combination will not cause any substantial environmental impact and a Negative Declaration has been prepared. ' Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 20790 in the C-2 (Light Commercialy zone, subject to the following conditions DISK 38:Reso2270 _ 1 I i „ Community Development Department Conditions 1. The s�xpl�vanL �hall �neec tiie requirements of all other City Departmerits . 2. The applicant, or his/her representative, shall sign a - Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, before any building permits are issued. . Planning Division Canditions 3. Within twenty-four (24) months after approval or conditional approval of Tentative Parcel Map, the subdivider shall file with the City of Lynwood, a Final fRag in substantial conformance with .the Tentative Parcel Map as approved or conditionally approved, and in conformance with the . Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Lynwood. � 4. No grading permit or building permit shall be issued prior to recordation of final map or another appropriate instrument approved by the City, with the office of the Los Angeles. County Recorder. ' S. Extension of the Tentative Map approval shall only be ' considered if the applicant or his/her representative, submits a written request for extension to the Community Development Department stating the reasons for the request, at least thirty (30) days before map approval is due to expire, pursuant to,,and in compliance with, Section 25-18, of the subdivision regulations of the City of Lynwood. 6. The Final Parcel Map shall be filed with the City Engineer of the City of Lynwood. Department of Public Works/Enaineerina Conditions �, 7. All conditions of the State Map Act and the City's , � subdivision Ordinance must be met prior to recordation. � All matters and improvements shall be consistent with the ordinances, standards, and procedures of the City's Development ' Standards, Engineering Procedures and � Standards, Water Standards, and Planting Standards of the Department of Parks and Recreation. _ The Developer is responsible for checking with staff for clarification of these requirements. 8. Submit a Subdivision Guarantee to this oEfice. The final map shall be based on a field survey or record data if sufficient data is available. All surveying for the proposed development will be done by the Developer, including the establishment of centerline ties. Enclose with the final map the surveyor's closure sheets. 9. Developer shall pay all applicable development fees including drainage, sewer, water and parkway trees prior to issuance of any buildings permits. Pay Parcel Map cheeking fees prinr to checking. ( 2 . � Pay $100 monument checking fee prior to recordation Deposit $50 with City Engineer to guarantee receipt by City of recorded, reproducible mylar, parcel map prior to recordatian. , Al1 special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees are to be paid prior to recording the final map. All - •requirements to the serving utilities to be met or guarantee prior to recording of the €inal map. 10. Grading and Draining A grading plan signed by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted for the approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer and the Director of Community � Development. The grading plan shall include the topography of all contigous properties and streets and shall provide for the methods of drainage in accordance with all ' applicable City standards. Retaining walls and other _. protective measures may be required. Offsite drainage ea.sements may be necessary. The structural section of all • parking areas shall be designed by a Civil Engineer based upon soils analysis supplied by a recognized and approved soils engineering firm. The structural section shall be approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. In the event that the design is not provided, the minimum structural section that will be approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer would be 2 inches of asphalt on 4 inches on untreated rock base. Submit to this office a Geologic/Soils Repozt signed by a Registered Soils Engineer. 11. Sewers The deve2opment shall be provided with public sewers. , Connect to public sewer. Provide laterals as necessary. Design of all sanitary sewers shall be approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 12. Water Systems , The Developer shall construct a water system including water services, fire hydrants and appurtenances through the development as required by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. The Developer shall submit a water system plan to the City of Lynwood Fire Department for�fire •_ hydrant locations. The City will install water meters . only. Payment for said meters shall be made to the City , prior to issuance of building permits. The Developer shall instaZl on-site water facilities includings stubs for water meters and fire hydrants on interior and on boundary arterial streets. . All conditions of the Lynwood Fire Department must be met prior to recordation. 13. Public Easements and Right-of-Way Where drainage, sewer and other such easements are required, the minimum easement width shall be ten (10) feet to facilitate maintenance unless otherwise approved by the ' -- Director of Public Works/City Engineer. . Dedicate sufficient right of way along Bullis Road to widen the street to accomodate two thru lanes north bound one thru lane sauth bound and one left turn lane at Century Boulevard. � DISK 38:RE502270 3 � 14. Sidewalks Design, configuration and locations shall be subject to the ' approval of the Director of Public Wroks/City Engineer, and the Director of Community Development. Ramps for ~ ,. physically handicapped persons shall be provided both on- site and off-side as required by State and local regulations. 15. Dust Control and Pedestrian Safetv Prior to the issuance of demolition or, grading permits, the developer shall: ` a. Submit a plan indicating safetp methods to be provided to maintain safe pedestrian ways around all areas of construction. This may require proper and adequate signs, fences, barricades, or other approved control devices as required by the Director of Community Development. 16. The Developer shall install all public improvements, as required by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer prior to issuance of any occupancy permits for this . development. Public Improvements shall include but are not limited to: ' a. Reconstruction of PCC sidewalk along Century Boulevard °, b. Reconstruction of PCC curb and gutter along Century Boulevard.. , c. Construction of (4) wheelchair ramps at all four corners of Le Sage Avenue and Bullis Road. d. Installing six (6) marbelite street lights with ; _ underground services and conduits. e. Planting (16) parkway tree (eucalyptus) along Bullis and Century Boulevard. f. Construction (16) tree wells with concrete covers along Bullis Road and Century Boulevard. h. Underground all utilities along Bullis Road and in the . vacated alley. , i. Reserve all existing utility easements in the vacated alley. j. Reserve all access easements on vacated alley. k. Construct drive approaches per City of Lynwood standards. 1. Construct five foot wide planter to separate sidewalks ' from parking lots. m. Construct planter curh to separate sidewalks from landscaping. n. Reloc�te catch basin at Bullis Road and Century '_r_.._...-.-- Boulevard. o. Construct new sidewalk, curb and gutter, and pavement along Bullis Road to accomodate the proposed street widening. DISK 38:RES02270 4 . I '� p. Prepare street improvement plans to match proposed dedication along Bullis Road. Plans must be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer. q. Traffic inductive loops shall be installed at Bullis Road and Century Boulevard intersection. r. All traffic markings, damaged or faded, shall be ' replaced with thermoplastic and/or traffic buttons. Traffic marking shall be installed on all newly constructed pavement. s. Developer shall pay for the design and relocation of traffic signal lights, street lights, conduits and all other conflicting facilities in conjunction with street ' widening. All changes and repairs in existing curbs, gutters, and sidewalks and other public improvements shall be paid for by the developer. If improvements are to be guaranteed, a faithful performance bond shall be posted by the developer to guarantee installation of said public improvements and an agreement for completion of improvements with the City Council shall be entered into. Submit Policy of Insurance or bond protecting City against damage or injury to persons or property growing out of, related to, or resulting from improvements or work. The Director of Public Works/City Engineer will determine amount and form. Deposit with the Director of Public Works/City Engineer before commencing any improvements, a sum estimated by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to cover cost of inpsection of all improvements under his jurisdiction Section 3: A copy of Resolution No. 2270 the conditions shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 14th day of March 1989, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Donald A. Dove, Chairperson I . APPROVED AS TO FORM: I APPROVED AS TO CONTENT• Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes _ Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney I Disk 38:Resoz270 � i 5 I I � I . 88093 DATE: January 10, 1988 .'� i ..J. v,.,.,M,..�-�-:�a TO: ' PLANNING COMMISSION ,.� , ' „�, U �? 0� ,. �„�' FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 88093 � Applicant: Donald R. Kittle � PROPOSAL ` The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop fourteen (14) apartment units at 11339-41 Louise Avenue in the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone. The applicant's request was approved by Resolution No. 2132 - Conditional Use Permit No. 87053, at the Planning Commission's regularly scheduled meeting of September 8, 1987. However, the Conditional Use Permit expired, requiring the applicant to submit a new Conditional Use, Permit to develop fourteen (14) units at the subject property. BACKGROUND On September 8, 1987, at its regular meeting, the Planninq Commission heard applications for a Tentative Parcel Map to combine two lots, and a Conditional Use Permit to develop fourteen (14) units at 11339-11341 Louise Avenue, I:ynwood, CA. Several issues were discussed including Air Quality, plant life, installation of block wall fence, light and glare, impact on life style, human health, and city schools, and surrounding schools. ' The Planning Commission approved the Tentative Parcel Map and Conditional Use Permit under Resolutions Number 2136 and 2132. on December 13, 1988, at its regular meeting, the Planning Commission heard the above proposal. However, the Staff requested I that the case be continued in order to secure an interpreter, as � required by law, for a concerned property owner who is hearing ; impaired. I FACTS: 1. Source of Authority Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Zoning ordinance requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to build or relocate dwelling units in the R-3 zone_ Section 25-4.Sb8 , regulates density bonuses. c 2. Property Location The subject property is known as 11339-41 Louise Avenue and consists of two (2) rectangular lots between Sanborn `Avenue and Century Boulevard (refer to attached Location Map). ` 3. Property Size The site is approximately one hundred (100') wide and two hundred and sixty-four feet (264') deep; the total area is approximately 26,400 square feet. Disk 41:88093CUP 1 5. Land Use Description The General Plan designation for the subject property is Multi-Family Residential, and the zoning classification is R- 3. The surrounding land use designations are as follows: General Plan Zonin North - Multi-Family North - R-3 South - Multi-Family . South - R-3 Eas.t - Multi-Family East - R-3 West - Multi-Family West - R-3 6. Proiect Characteristics The applicant proposes to develop fourteen (14) apartment - units. The design consists of: (a) 6 two-bedroom units, (b) 4, three-bedroom units, (c) 4 two-bedroom units with private patio and a common B-B-Q pit (refer to attached plans). The proposed development is also offering a shared playground, laundry facility, stamped concrete driveway, and security gates. A total of thirty (30) parking spaces (10 enclosed, 16 carports, and 4 open parking spaces for guest parking and handicapped). A six foot (6') high block wall will be constructed along the perimeter of the lot, except in the twenty foot (20') front setback in which the wall will not exceed four (4') foot in � height. A minimum of twenty-five (25�) percent of the site area will . be comprised of landscaped open space with an automatic irrigation system. The total height of the principal building does not exceed thirty-five (35') feet. The height of the accessory structures does not excced fifteen (15') feet. 7. Site Plan Review I Site Plan Review scheduled for November 10, 1988, was waived I per authorization from the Director of Community Development. ' Design and scope of development has remained the same. �, , 8.• Zoning Enforcement Historv None of record. ' 9'. Public Response No response as of the writing of this report. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION 1. Consistency with General Plan The property is consistent with the existing zoning classification (R-3) and the General Plan designation (MUlti- Family Residential). Therefore, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 88093 will not adversely affect the Lynwood General Plan. Disk 41:88093CCUP 2 2. Site Suitability The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development relative to density, bulk of the structures, parking, walls, fences, landscaping, driveways � and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. The property is adequately served with the required public utilities and offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessiblity. 3. Compatibility The proposed development is surrounded by high density residential developments; therefore, the project will be compatible with the development in the area. 4. Compliance with Development Standards ' The proposal meets all of the development standards required by the Zoning Ordinance with respect to parking; front, side, and rear-yard setbacks; distance between structures; , lot coverage; open space and landscaping; building height; unit siae and density. The base density within the R-3 zone (18 unit/acre) allows the development of eleven (11) units. The applicant has requested the maximum density bonus allowed by the Zoning Ordinance. Threrefore, three (3) additional units may be granted as follows: o Section 25-4.Sb7(1) (bonus clause for provisions of low and moderate income housing) permits granting up to 250 of - the base density, provided all development standards are met and the applicant agrees to enter into a fifteen (15) year covenant with the City to ensure that the rent for the bonus units will remain at affordable or fair market rent,levels. 5. Conditions of Approval The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties . or interfere on the values of the surrounding properties or , interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. 6. Benefits to Community The proposed development will aid in aesthetically upgrading the neighborhood and will act as a catalyst in fostering ' other quality developments. Furthermore, the development will add favorably to the City's housing stock and will provide additional affordably-priced housing in furtherance of the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. 7. Environmental Assessment Staff has found that no substantial environmental impact wiTl result from the proposed development; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared and is on file in the Community Development Department. , ; Disk 41:88093CCUP � , 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2247: 1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 88093, will . not have a significant effect on the environment and certifyinq the Negative Declaration as adequate. 2. Appr.oving Conditional Use Permit No. 88093, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Plot Plans 3. Resolution No. 2247 DISK 41a88093CUP _ � � I � 4 , I . . . 88093CUP RESOLUTION NO. 2247 A RE50LUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMIS5ION OF THE ' CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88093 TO CONSTRUCT FOURTEEN (14) UNITS IN THE R-3 (MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, 11339-41 LOUISE AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, 90262. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on subject application for a Conditional Use Permit; and � WHEREAS, the Planning Commission carefully considered all pertinent tesfimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for development in the R-3 (Multi-Family ResidentialJ zone. Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as follows: ' A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping, " driveways and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. B. The granting of the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the Lynwood General Plan. C. The structures as proposed, or modified, subject to conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding properties or interfere with or endang�r the public health, safety or welfare. D. The site will be developed pursuant to the current zoning regulations and site,plan submitted, reviewed and approved by the Site Plan Review Committee. E. The proposed development will add favorably to the housing stock and will provide additional affordably priced housing in concert with the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. F. The proposed development will aid in aesthetically upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in fostering other quality�developments. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 88093, provided the following conditions are observed and complied with at all times. DISK 41:88093RE5' , . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. 2. The applicant or his representative, shall sign a Statement of Acceptance within fifteen (15) days from the date of approval of this Resolution by the Planning Commission. Signing this statement implies that applicant or his represenative has read, understands and agrees to the conditions of this Resolution. PLANNING DIVISION 3. A parcel map shall be required to merge the 2 lots into one. parcel. 4. All City of Lynwood Municipal Code and Zoning Ordinance requirements shall be met. 5. The total development will consist of fourteen (14) apartment , units, along with parking and other amenities. ' 6. A minimum of thirty (30) parking spaces shall be provided. At least fourteen (14) of the total parking spaces shall be uncovered with two (2) parking space for guest/handicapped. 7. A minimum of twenty-five percent (25�) of the lot shall be . landscaped and provided with an automatic irrigation system. 8. Apartment building and unit numbers shall be plainly visible and shall be a minimum of four inches (4") in height and shall be contrasting in color to the background. 9, The Community Development Department shall have the right of reasonable inspection, as with any other business within the City, for the purpose of protecting the general health, safety and welfare. 10. A trash enclosure shall be provided per Building Division standards. 11. All construction shall be performed by a licensed contractor. 12. A landscape plan shall be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 13. No principal building on the site shall exceed a height of thirty-five (35') feet. ' 14. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved, and shall have sufficient illumination for security. 15. Construction shall be completed within six (6) months �from date of isssuance of building permits. 16. The Conditional Use Permit shall become null and void if compliance under the foregoing conditions does not commence within ninety (90) days from the date on which the Conditional Use Permit was granted. 17. A masonry wall six feet (6') in height shall be constructed along the perimet�r of the property, except within the twenty foot (20') fronE yard setback, which shall not exceed four feet (4') in height. Construction of a fence in the front yard set- _ back is optional (not r.equired). DISK 41:88093RE5 38. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in a sanitary condition pending construction, and shall be main- tained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure to , comply may result in revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. 19. The applicant shall agree to execute a covenant to be drafted by the City Attorney restricting rent levels to fair market rent levels for the bonus unit for ten (10) years from date of issuance of certificate of occupancy. - 20. Final building elevations, including materials of construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the Building Official prior to issuance of any building permits. 21. Before any building permits may be issued, the applicant/developer shall pay $1.50 per square foot for residential buildings to the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government Code Section 53080. FIRE DEPARTMENT 22. Provide approved (U.L. and State Fire Marshall) smoke detectors for each unit (U.B.C.). 23. Provide one (1) 2A type fire extinguisher within 75 feet travel distance on each floor. 24. Provide 4" dry fire line to rear portion of property. (Obtain specific requirements from Lynwood Fire Department.) 25. Where security gates are installed on premises, the locking mechanism shall be of the type that does not require a key or . any special knowledge to exit premises. Also, provide a knox box at front of property. 26. Where security bars are placed on bedroom windows, at least one window per bedroom must have quick-release mechanisms: PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 27. The property is composed of two separate lots; tie in the two lots by filing a parcel map. 28. Submit a grading plan signed by a registered Civil Engineer. Property is located within 100 year flood zone area. Pad elevations shall be one (1) foot above flood level zone per flood boundary map. Also conform to all applicable codes per Section 12-1/2 of Lynwood Municipal Code. Building above flood level will require substantial amount of fill, therefore, suggest alternative methods of design to minimize amount of livable space at ground level. . 29. No grading and/or building permits shall be issued until the - parcel map has been recorded in the Office of the Los Angeles County Recorder. 30. ,Construct new monolithic 8" curb and 24" gutter along new = sidewalk and required adjacent pavement along Louise Avenue. 31: Reconstruct (2) damaged and substandard drive approached on Louise Avenue, per City of Lynwood standards. 32. Provide and install (1) marbelite street pole with light fi.xture with underground services and conduits on Louise _� Avenue. DISK 41:88093RE5 I � 33. Plant (1) parkway tree 20 feet north of south property line per City standards. Type and size of species to be determined by the Department of public Works. ' 34. Regrade parkway and saw grass seeds. 35.. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected separately. Since present site plan includes (6) buildings, it may be advantageous to construct an eight (8) inch sewer main line into the property. See Engineering Division for details. . 36. Underqround all utilities. Section 3. Staff has found that no substantial environmental impact will result from the proposed development; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared and is on file in the Community Development Department and the Office of the City Clerk. Section 4. A copy of this Resolution shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this lOth day of January, 1988, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ' ABSTAIN: Donald A. Dove, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ' Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney DISK 41:88093RES .. �. �1 � . � �� .€,�.�;"-; ! i ��`��► i�l�. 3 �� DATE: January 10, 1989 �{�� , �� 3 , m .-,m,�„�� TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Vicente L. Mairector SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 89003 Applicant: Sangwarlaya Tiraphatna PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a four (4) unit, two-bedroom apartment building at 11127-29 Louise Avenue, Lynwood. Currently, the property is developed with two single-family residences. FACTS: ' 1. Source of Authority Section 25-4.2.A of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained for any residential development in the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone. 2. Property Location: The site is located on the West side of Louise Avenue between Elmwood and Beechwood Avenue (Refer to the attached Location Map). 3. Property Size: The site consists of a rectangular lot of approximately 13,200 square feet (50 x 264'). 4. Existing Land Use: The site is presently occupied by two single-family � dwellings. The surrounding land uses are as follows: North - Multi-Family/Single-Family South - Single-Family East - Single-Family/Multi-Family I West - Single-Family 5. Land Use Designation: � The General Plan designation for the subject property is i Multiple Family, while the zoning description is R-3. The surroundinq land use designations are as follows: i General Plan 2oning � North - Multiple-Family North - R-2/R-3 South - Multiple-Family South - R-3 East - Multiple-Family East - R-3 West - Multiple-Family West - R-2/R-3 � I I DISK 43: 89003CUP i � 1 I — I 6. Project Characteristics: The property is currently developed with two single-family • dwellings and two-car garage. The applicant proposes to maintain the single-family dwellings and construct a four unit apartment building consisting of two, two-bedroom units at 760.5 square feet each and two, two-bedroom units at 784 square feet each. Twelve (12) parking spaces will be provided on the site with four (4) spaces enclosed in carports, one two-car garage and " six (6) uncovered spaces. The proposed development exceeds the allowable density by one (1) dwelling unit. Planning Commission has the authority to approve units in excess of the allowable density if the units are designated as affordable units or if they are part of a development proposal which conforms to all other zoning regulations and which incorporates unique features into its design. The total height of the building is twenty-five (25') feet. 7. Site Plan Review: On December 15, 1988, the Site Plan Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and recommended approval by the Planninq Commission, subject to specific conditions and requirements. 8. 2oning Enforcement Historv: None of record. 9. Public Response: A letter from the Lynwood School District is attached. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS 1. Consistency with General Plan I The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning , classification (R-3) and the General Plan designation (Multiple-Family Housing). Therefore, qranting Conditional Use Permit No. 89003, will not adversely affect the General Plan. 2. Site Suitabilitv . � The subject property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development relative to the proposed density; bulk of the structures; parking; wall fences; driveways, and other development features required by the Zbning Ordinance. Furthermore, the subject property is adequately served with the required public utilities and offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility. 3. Compliance with Development Standards The proposed development meets all the development standards required by the Zoning Ordinance regarding off-street parking; front; side, and rear yard setbacks; lot coverage, height, unit size; and density. DISK 43: 89003CUP � 2 � � The base density within the R-3 zone (18 unit/acre) allows the development of five (5) units. The applicant has requested the maximum density bonus allowed by the Zoninq Ordinance. , Therefore, one (1) additional unit may be granted as follows: o Section 25-4.Sb7(1) (bonus clause for provisions of low and moderate income housing) permits granting up to 25$ of the base density, provided all development standards are met and the applicant agrees to enter into a fifteen (15J year covenant with the City to ensure that the rent for the bonus units will remain at affordable or fair market rent levels. ' 4. Compatibility The proposed project will be located in a neighborhood that "-�� has substantially transitioned from single-family to multiple-family residences. Properties located to the north and west are developed with a fourplex and duplex, respectively, and other properties in the vicinity are developed with multiple units. The proposed project is consistent with the R-3 zoning in the area and with the . Multiple-Family General Plan designation. 5. Conditions of Approval The improvementsas proposed, subject to the conditions recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. 6. Benefits to Community The proposed development will aid to aesthetically upgrade the neighborhood and will act as a catalyst to foster other quality developments. Moreover, the development will add favorably to the City's housing stock in'furtherance of the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. 7. Environmental Assessment The proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared. RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2257: 1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, No. 89003 will not have a significant effect on the environment, and certify the Negative Declaration as adequate. 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 89003 subject � to the stated conditions and requirements. ATTACHMENTS• 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan 3. Resolution No. 2257 I DISK 43: 89003CUP I 3 � I I 89003CUP RESOLUTION NO. 2257 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE_ CITY_ OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89003 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STCTRY, FOUR (4) UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING WITH TWU EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS AT 11127-29 lOUISE AVENU�, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, IN TAE R-3 (MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE. WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for development in the R-3 (MUltiple-Family Residential) zone. Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as follows: A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accomodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the . Official Zoning Ordinance. . B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding � properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety, or welfare. C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current zoning regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the Site Plan Review Committee. D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. - E. Finding that no substantial environmental impact will result from the proposed project, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. � DISK 32:2257reso • I I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community Bevelopment Department, Planninq Division, for review of said Conditional Use Permit. 3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. 4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance of any building permits. PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS S. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving the proposed development. 6. Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25$) percent of the lot area. 7. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. � The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs combined with ground cover as follows: Single-Family: One (1) five (5) gallon shrub for each 100 square feet of landscaped area; and two (2) fifteen gallon trees for each 500 square feet of landscaped area. 8. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped and shall consist predominately of plant materials except for necessary walks, drives and fences. 9. A minimum of twelve (12) parking spaces shall be I provided. There shall be six (6) covered and six (6) uncovered parking spaces. 10. A six (6') foot high block wall shall be installed along the perimeter of the property, except within the twenty (20') foot frontyard setback. In this frontage, if built, the wall shall not exceed a height of four (4') feet measured from top of curb. _ 11. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet. 12. Final building elevations, including materials of construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the Building Official and the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. 13. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer shall pay $1.53 per square foot for residential buildings I to the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to --- Government Code Section 53080. DISK 32:2257RES0 I � i � _ _ � 14. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved. 15. Prior to the installation or construction of any masonry wall, the property owner shall obtain a permit for and submit the following information to the Planning Division: a. Simple' plot plan showing the location of the masonry wall in relation to property lines, lengths, proposed materials, and openings or gates to provide access for vehicles and pedestrians. '. b. For masonary walls (as defined in subsection 25-2.1) a building permit shall be applied for in addition to the plot plan described above. All masonry walls of any height shall need the requirements for masonry construction as defined in Chapter 24 of the Unified Building Code. A fee based on the valuation of the proposed construction shall be paid to the Building Department. c. All masonry walls shall be required to maintain adequate pedestrian access for the purpose of safety and convenience. A thirty-six (36) inch or three (3) foot clear gate or opening shall be provided to all enclosures for pedestrian and wheelchair access. Pedestrian and vehicular access shall be provided separately. d. All masonry walls shall be required to be installed with a finished, aesthetically pleasing side facing out toward adjacent properties or the public right-of- way. e. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void ninety (90) days after the use permitted has been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised. Design 16. Accoustical construction materials be used throughout the units to mitiqate freeway noise to the standards and satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. I 17. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective I material including shingles, woodshake, asphalt composite, crushed rock and other similar roofing material that is not reflective, glossy, or polished and/or roll form type metal roofing. 18. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar material other than the reflective, glossy, polished and/or roll-formed type metal siding. 19. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the street dedications. ' 20. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the exterior elevation of the building must be approved by the Director of Community Development or his/her designee. 21. Trash areas shall be enclosed by a five (5') foot high decorative masonry walls with gates. DISK 32:2257RE50 I I � 22. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in a consistent manner, including the incorporation within the side and rear building elevations of same or all of , the design elements used for the primary (front) facades. 23. That the applicant submit elevation drawings to the Planning Division showing the exterior building design; including the specification of colors, and materials. 24. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally compat.ible with the design of the subject and adjacent buildings. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc. shall be installed without the prior written approval of the Director of Community Develogment. 25. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment, swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical devises shall be located within the rear yard�or street side yard of a corner lot. Such equipment shall be screened from surrounding properties and streets and so operated that they donot disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring residents, in accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance. 26. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in sanitary condition pending construction and shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure to comply may result in revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. 27. The facade of the existing structure shall be improved to the satisfaction of staff with an additional material to window level which relates to the facade of the new construction. Staff's determination is reviewable if necessary by the Planning Commission. Further, the applicant shall submit with the application the proposed materials of the facade of the buildinq facinq the street, with no less than one polaroid shot in color. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS , ( I 28. Provide smoke detectors for each unit. ' i 29. Provide one (1) approved 2A type fire extinguisher within � seventy-five feet (75') travel distance on each floor. 30. Provide minimum twenty foot (20') unobstructed driveway to rear of property with approved turn-around. 31. Alternative #1: Provide a minimum 150 feet four inches (150'4") fire line. (Obtain specific requirements from Fire Department.) 32. Alternative #2: Provide automatic fire sprinkler systems throughout the units. 33. If security gates are installed on premises, the locking mechanism shall be of the type that does not require a key or any special �nowledge to exit premises. Also, provide a Knox box at entrance. I 34. Post no parking sign in driveway. DISK 32:2257RES0 I I i I I I I I , PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS , 35. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered Civil Engineer. Grading plan will be checked by Public Works Department. No buildinq permits will be issued prior to the approval of grading plan by City Engineer. 36. Property is located within 100 year flood zone area. Pad elevations shall be 1 foot above flood level zone per flood boundary map. Also canform to all app].icable codes per section 12 1/2 of Lynwood Municigal Code. Building above flood level will require substantial amount of fill, therefore, suggest alternative methods of design to minimize amount of livable space at ground level. 37. Reconstruct damaged and substandard drive approach(es), per City standards. Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this lOth day of January, 1989, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I Donald Dove, Chairperson I � APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney I I DISK 32: 2257RES0 I .:� � �,, .� DATE: January 10, 1989 1�,�, ,.;�, , 1 i� t�'� ��' � TO: PLANNING COMMISSION , • ��p � l �� '� J ' ' �„ � � � �:.. � d'_i __.-..--.,,..,,��*>�1� FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Directar Community Development Department i SUBJECT:�Zoning Ordinance Amendment Case No. 1, Parking Standards, City Wide PROPOSAL• The staff is proposing to Amend Chapter 25, the official Zoning Ordinance with respect to parking standards city wide. BACKGROUND: Following approval of certain development projects in the City of _ , Lynwood, the staff has found that there are substantial and • significant deficiencies within the City's Zoning Ordinance, governing, parking, loading design and layout standards, which � preclude maximizing off-street parking and layout opportunities. It is the intent of this staff report and proposed Amendment, to only deal with quantitative parking requirements, as this is an issue which must be immediately corrected. Loading design and layout standards will be addressed at a later date, when greater study has been done. ' FACTS: Increased parking on commercial stre2ts, create more traffic congestion in many commercial zones throughout the city, and is primarily due to inadequate parking prouided on existing developed commercial/manufacturing lots. Staff believes that much of the increased on-street parking is attributable to inadequate parking standards in the City of -Lynwood Zoning Ordinance. Staff recommends that the City re-established quantitative parkinq requirements and eventually parking design and layout guidelines to remedy the deficiencies in off-street parking. The establishment off-street parking of adequate commercial/manufacturing zones is necessary to protect the public health, safety, convenience and public welfare. F. The City of Lynwood parking standards have never been totally , revised, and though the ordinance has requirements for specific land uses, a great deal of the required parking is established through zoning classifications. For example, if a business owner is located in the C-2A zone, regardless of the land use, (if the use is not specifically addressed by the ordinance) parking requirements would be 1 space for each four hundred (400) square ' feet of gross floor area. This is not sufficient as their has been a tremendous increase in automobile traffic in Lynwood due , to increased automobile ownership. . ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: City" staff reviewed parking standards of five (5) cities: Compton, Lawndale, Norwalk, Paramount and Commerce. The survey deals with requirements for specific land uses, especially, areas in which staff believes, present parking problems to the city; ie commercial, office and manufacturing. Disk 42:ZOA1 I 1 �! I I , The analysis discloses, that the City of Lynwood has one of the most lenient parking requirements among the surveyed cities. Some of the areas which staff paid particular attention are requirements for government administrative buildings, medical offices and facilities, various types of commercial land uses and requirements for industrial land uses. The proposed Amendment was published in the Lynwood Press on December 29, 1988, and the staff has not received any comments as of the date of this report. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff, has found that no substantial environmental impact will result from the project; therefore, a Negative Declaration has ' been prepared, and is on file in the Community Development Department. RECOMMENDATION: ` In view of the complexity of the issue and the short time the Commissioners are given to review this matter; staff recommends that we continue the item to allow the Commission to review and consider the proposal. Disk 4'L:ZOA1 • 2 ;;� �J 25-14 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING ; AREAS 25-14.1 Off-Street Parking; Applicability In all zoning districts, there shall be provided at the time any building is erected, enlarged, increased in capacity or changed from a nonconforming use to a permitted use, off-street parking spaces in acordance - with the requirements of this chapter and the design standards of the City, except where the floor area of a � single-family structure in a residential zoning district � is increased by less than fifty percent (SOa). ' ' (Ordinance No. 1184.) � 25-14.2 Design and Development The provisions of this section shall be incorporated into all applicable design standards to which the City currently adheres, e.g., City of Lynwood Driveway Standards, L.A. County Road Department Standards, etc. All parking areas shall be paved with hard surface and sloped so as to be drained of all surface water. (Ordinance No. 1131.) 25-14.3 Size of Parkinct Spaces Amended Each off ,street parking space shall not be less than � twenty (2-0) feet in length and nine (9) feet in width, exclusive of access driveways or aisles, except as noted below a. Any parking space that is immediately adjacent to a - wall, structural, column, light standards, or similar obstruction on one or both of its' longer sides shall be at least ten (10) feet in width. b. Spaces within a building shall be ten feet by twenty feet (1Ox20) or eight and one half feet by seventeen feet (8.5x17) as applicable to standard or compact car spaces. Amended c. Smaller spaces for compact automobiles may be permitted for up to 200 of the required parking spaces in non-residential parking areas (commercial) with at least one hundred and fifty (150) parking spaces, twenty five (25%) of the parking spaces may be compact if the development proposal required two-hundred and fifty (250) spaces or more. All compact spaces must be labeled as designated by city staff. d. Tandem parking may be permitted with certain types of commercial uses where there is attendant ,parking. The use of tandem parking shall be permitted only where Site Plan approval has been granted in accordance with Section 25-32 of this . chapter. 1. The reduced spaces shall be no less than seven (7) feet, six (6) inches in width and fifteen (15) feet in length (except as noted in paragraph a. above), and must be prominently labeled as compact car spaces. DISK 42: ZOA1 3 , , ;� � � 2. The use of compact parking spaces shall be permitted only where Site Plan approval for the proposed parking area has been granted in accordance with Section 25-32 of this chapter. (Ord. No. 1131.) 25-14.4 Access .There shall be adequate provisions for ingress and egress to all parking and loading spaces where a lot . does not abut on a public street. For easement of access on a public street there shall be provided an unoccupied and unobstructed easement of an access or service drive of not less than twenty (20) feet in width of right of way Ieading to the parking or storage areas or loading or unloading spaces required herein. A wider right of way width may be required by the Planning Commission as a condition to permit approval when found to be necessary in the interest of the public health, safety and general welfare. In any case, where an access or service drive is not provided through access or where parking design is such that satisfactory turn around is not possible, a turn around having a radius of ; forty (40) feet shall be provided. (Ord. No. 808) � 25-14.5 Computation of Parkina Reauirements Where several different places of assembly such as rooms or halls are contained within one use or building, the gross floor area or-number of seats used to determine off-street parking requirements shall be the place of assembly or combination of several places of assembly that would normally be used at any one time, whichever ' will accommodate the larger number of people. Where several uses are contained within a building or on a side, the off-street parking area required shall be the total of each of the requirements of all such uses. 25-14.6 Minimum Off-Street Parkina Reauirements Use Parkinq Spaces Reauired Same Banks 1 for each 200sq.ft. of gross floor area New Business offices, such as 1 for each 300sq ft. of , public utility, commercial, gross floor area insurance agencies, real estate sales Same Boarding or Rooming house 1 space per room Same Bowling Alleys 5 spaces for each lane Same Chi1d day care and nursery 1 space per teacher or schools employee Amended Churches 1 for each 6 fixed seats simultaneously for assembly purposes or , if there be no fixed seats, theri 1 for each seventy (70)sq. ft. of floor space used for assembly purposes DISK 42: ZOA1 4 ` Dance (Other than tavern � dance). public assembly and exhibition hall without fixed seats: one (1) space for each (50) square feet of floor area used for assembly or dancing. Amended Dwellings, Single-Family 2 enclosed parking or Two-Family (attached spaces for each or detached dwelling unit Amended Dwellings, multiple (more 2 enclosed parking than two families) spaces for each unit, • and 3 open spaces of each ten units Where it is physically impractical to provide a double garage an existing single-family dwelling with a single garage may be enlarged without the necessity of providing an enclosed two-car garage. , New Furniture and appliances, 1 for each 300sq. ft. hardware, household equip- of gross floor area ment, service shops, clothing or shoe repair or personal services such as barber and beauty shops Same General Hospitals 1 per bed Intensive care with surgery 1 per bed Convalescent 1 per (5) beds Hotels 1 per bedroom Same High Schools, Jr. High Schools, 5 spaces per classroom Elementary Schools, Public or ' Private Amended Industrial uses, except as 1 for each 3 otherwise specified herein on the maximum working shift, or 1 for each 450sq.ft. of floor area, whichever amount is greater . New Institutional, Governmental 1 for each 200sq.ft. of Offices floor area New Laboratories, biochemical, 1 for each 300sq.ft. of - X-Ray, dental, research and gross floor area . testing . New Libraries 1 for each 250sq.ft. of gross floor area New Manufacturing uses, such as 1 for each 3 employees creameries, bottling. on the maximum working establishments, bakeries, shift or 1 for each canneries, printing and 300sq.ft. of gross engraving shops, etc. floor area, whichever amount is greater`' = DISK 42:ZOA1 � 5 New Mini-warehouse buildings used for self storage Amended Mortuaries and Funeral Homes New New New New New Retail stores, except as otherwise specified herein: -having not more than 5,000 sq.ft. of floor area Same Restaurants, cocktail lounges, beers Motor vehicle sales, machinery sales or wholesale stores Pharmacies, drugstores Professional Offices: Attorneys, Accountants, Engineers, Architects Medical, Dental, Optometrist, Chiropractors, Oculist, Opticians having more than S,OOOsq.ft of floor area 1 for each twenty-five storage cubicles and distributed equally throughout the storage area within parking lanes; two way driveways, one twenty- six foot wide parking and travel lane. l for each 25sq.ft. of floor area of assembly rooms used for service 1 for each 400sq. ft. of gross floor area 1 for each 150sq.ft. of gross floor area 1 for each 200sq. ft. of gross floor area 1 for each 150sq.ft. of gross floor area 1 for 200sq.ft. of gross floor area 25 spaces plus 1 for each 150sq.ft. of gross floor area in excess of S,OOOsq.ft. • 1 space for each . 100sq.ft. of gross floor area Same Senior citizen housing, 1 space per unit defined as housing designed for and intended for occupancy by ambulatory persons sixty (60) years of age and over Amended Theaters 1 for each seats up to 800 seats plus 1 for each 5 seats over 800 New Trailer Parks 1 for each sleeping unit or dwelling unit New New Trade and/or vocational schools Transportation and trucking terminal facilities DISK 42: ZOA1 0 3 plus one for each student that is designed to accomodate Adequate number as determined by the Planning Commission �