The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal AboutA 1989-11-14 PLANNING COMMISSION �" ' �'�'ee' �, � A G E N D A LYNWOOD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING - 7:30 P.M. °�� City Hall Council Chambers P�,a"�.,t.� 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood;t CA. �� E o � �� Nc��m NOVEMBER 14 , 1989 ��T�CLERK� b NOV �'� 1989 cM rl 1 � Donald A. Dove � �� Chairperson �n�� ,� �� i Lena Cole-Dennis Carlton McMiller Commissioner Commissioner John K. Haynes Ro Pr or I Vice Chairman Commissioner � Lucille Kanka David J. Willis, (Jamal Muhsin) Commissioner Alternate Commissioner C O M M I S S I O N C O U N S E L: i � _ Hen'r.y S. Barbosa Douglas D. Barnes � . City•Attorney Deputy City Attorney ( I STAFF: I Vicente L.'Mas, Director Aubrey D. Fenderson I Community Development Department Planning Manager Art Barfield Planning Associate , I I . ' DISK 47: AGENCOVR � I I I I November 14, 1989 OPENING CEREMONIES: A. Call meeting to order B. Flag salute C. Roll call of Commissioners D. Certification of Agenda posting. E. Approval of Minutes for September 13, and September 26 1989 Planning Commission Meetings. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. CONDZTIONAL USE PERMIT N0. (CUP 19) Applicant: Reynaldo Lizarraga COMMENTS• � The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to construct (3) three dwelling units at 3314 Alma Avenue in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone. � RECOMMENDED ACTZON: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2286: A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3). B. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 19, subject to I the stated conditions and requirements. , i 2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE 25 (CUP 251 I Applicant: Oscar 0. Aparicio ( � COMMENTS: � I The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use ! Permit to develop a 21,000 sq. ft. auto center at 10733- � ' 10749 Long Beach Boulevard in the C-2A (Medium-Commercial) � 2one. , I RECOMMENDED ACTION: I Staff respecCfully requests that the Planning Commission � continue Conditional Use Permit Case No. 25 to its regularly , scheduled meeting on December 12, 1989. i � � disk54:agendall ' I ( ; 3. VARIANCE CASE NO. 3(VAR. 3) Applicant: Elias Ayoub COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting approval of a Variance to construct a ten (10) foot high momument sign at 3654 Imperial Highway in the HMD (Hospital, Medical, Dental) zone. • RECOMMENDED ACTZON: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning Commission deny the Variance request: A. Finding that a hardship has not been established that would require a Variance for Case No. 3 as determined by Section 25-26 of the City of Lynwood Zoning Code. B. Finding that the applicant will not be deprived of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same vicinity if the recommendatio of denial is upheld. NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS: . 4. CEOA MONITERING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT (ZOA1 5 COMMENTS• Staff is proposing to add to Chapter 25, the Official Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lynwood; to provide a CEQA Monitoring program for deiscretionary development projects and permits City-wide. RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully requests, that after consideration the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No._2302. , A. The project is exempt from the provisions of State CEQA Guidelines, as amended by Section 15061 b(3). B. Recommend that the City Council approve the findings in Resolution No. 2302, waive the readinq and introduce the proposed ordinance amendment. i 5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 26 (CUP 26) Applicant: Alexis Galindo � � COMMENTS I i The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use � Permit to develop three two-story townhouses at 12426 Harris ' Avenue, in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. � RECOMMENDED ACTION: ' � Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the � Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2298: j 1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt , from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as � amended by Section 15061 b(3). 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 26, subject to i the stated conditions and requirements. I DISK54:AGENDAl1 � i 6. Modified Conditional Use Permit No. 27 (CUP 27) Applicant(s): Roberto and Maria T. Gonzalez C OMMENTS: The applicant is requestinq approval of a Modified Condi- tional Use Permit to build six (6) apartment dwellings in ' front of an existing single-family home at 5225 Beechwood � Ave. in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone. RE COMMENDED ACTION Staff respectfully request that the Planming Commission continue Modified Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 27 to its regularly scheduled meeting on December 12, 1989. 7. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 28 Applicant: Amado Zavalza COMMENTS: . The applicant is requesting approval of Conditional Use Permit to develop two (2) two-story dwelling units at 3511 Sanborn Avenue in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone. . ` RECOMMENDEp ACTION: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2300: 1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the $tate CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061.b(3j. 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 28, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. 8. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 29 (CUP29) ' Applicant: Leonel Paz � COMMENTS: , The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop two (2) two-story dwelling units, at 3352 Elizabeth Avenue in the R-3 (Mu1ti-Family Residential) zone. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the ' Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2301: 1. Certifyinq that the project is categorically exempt from � the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3). 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 29, subject to the stated conditions and requirements, DISK54:AGENDAl1 . , , . . REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS S None STAFF COMMENTS � General Plan Update CUP Study June 88 - June 89 � Commissioner Kanka (Award for Service) ` PUBLIC ORALS COMMISSION ORALS ' AA70URNMENT Adjourn to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on December 12, 1989, at 7:3A p.m., in the City Hall Council Cham- bers, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California. DTSK 54:AGENDAl1 ' � � � _ � , � ' 1 � � � � i ' � � � .. .._. - - �._.. �� I I . I ( ! I ''� MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING ,� ' PLANNING COMMISSZON : CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA T[JESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1989 , OPENING CEREMONIES � A. Call to Order The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood was called to order by Chairperson Dove on the above captioned date at 7:33 p.m., in the Council Chambers of Lynwood City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California 90262. B. Pledge of Allegiance Commissioner Muhsin led the Pledge of Allegiance. C. Roll Call of Commissioners Chairperson Dove requested the roll call, and Mr. Fenderson complied. Present: Commissioner ponald A. Dove Commissioner Carlton McMiller Commissioner Jamal Muhsin Commissioner Roy Pryor , Also present: Douglas Barnes, Attorney Aubrey Fenderson, Planning Manager Arthur Barfield, Planning Associate Vicente L. Mas, Community Development Director John Oskoui, Civil Engineering Assistant Joy Valentine, Minutes Clerk Mr. Oskoui introduced Debroah Lewis, a new Civil Engineering Assistant, to the Commissioners, who welcomed her to the meeting. Mr. Fenderson stated that Commissioner Willis requested an excused absence because of illness and Commissioner Cole-Dennis requested an excused absence because she is out of town on business. MOTION by Commissioner IIaynes, SECONDED by Commissioner Muhsin, to grant excused absences to Commissioners Cole-Dennis and Willis. MOTION carried unanimously by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Dove, McMiller, Muhsin, Aaynes Pryor NOES: None ABSENT:. Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Willis� �Wis Morales ABSTAIN: None Approximately twelve people were in the audience. E. Certification of Aaenda PostinQ Mr. Fenderson stated the agenda was posted per the Brown Act. DISK6:PC9-13-89 1 • F. Aoproval of Minutes Chairperson Dove asked about the minutes of the regular meeting held August 8, 1989, and the special meeting on � August 28, 1989. Mr. Fenderson stated they had problems, not only with the minutes, but with the preparation of the agenda for this meeting, because their regular typist has been on � vacation for four weeks. Also, Mr. B-Pessima is now workinq for Los Angeles. The minutes clerk stated that she has delivered both minutes to City staff. 1. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 15 (CUP 151 11168 louise Avenue (H. Leandro Morales) Applicant requests approval to develop a four-unit, two-story residental building in the R-3 zone. Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing and Sergio Estevez, architect, 3837 E. Seventh Street, Long Beach, rose to speak. Chairperson Dove asked if he plans to use tile roofing and mr. Estevez replied in the affirmative. Commissioner Pryor asked if he'd read all forty conditions and Mr. Estevez said he hadn't. Mr. Fenderson said the applicant, Mr. Morales, had agreed to all conditions at the Site Plan review, and at this time the appl�cant, Mr. Lee Morales, 7000 Mountain View, Huntington Park 90255, rose to state his acceptance of all conditions. There being no one else wishing to speak either in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposal, Chairperson Dove closed the Public Hearing. Commissioner Pryor commented that it was one of the nicest designs he'd seen in a long time. MOTION by Commissioner Willis, SECONDED by Commissioner McMiller, to approve Resolution No. 2282, "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 15 (CUP 15) FOR THE CONSTRUCTZON OF TWO (2), TWO STORY, DUPLEXES AT 11168 LOUISE AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, IN THE R-3 (MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE," subject to the stated conditions and requirements and certifying that the project is categoricaly exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended by Section 15062 b(3). MOTION carried by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Dove, McMiller, Muhsin, Haynes, Pryor NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Willis ABSTAIN: None 2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3(CUP 19) 3410 Alma Avenue, Reynaldo Lizarraga Applicant requests approval to develop three dwelling units _..__.___ in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone, with an existing '� single-family dwelling. DISK6:PC9-26-89 2 • Mr. Fenderson requested that this item be tabled until further notice to allow applicant time to revise his plans to , address issues of automobile access and proposed location of trash enclosure. he stated the applicant is not sure he will be financially able to finish the project. Mr. Barnes recommended denial or continuance to a definite date. Commissioner Aaynes asked Mr. Fenderson why he wanted to continue the case since the applicant isn't sure he'll be able to continue. Mr. Barfield said the applicant has trouble communicating with his present archietect and Mr. Fenderson said staff doesn't like the present plans, but feels the problems will untimately be resolved. There was a short discussion about continuing the case for sixty days or until the November 14 meeting of the Planning Commission and it was concluded that it would be best to continue to the November 14 meeting of the Planning Commission. MOTION by Commissioner Haynes, SECONDED by Commissioner McMiller, to continue Agenda Item No. 2, Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 19 to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission to be held November 14, 1989. MOTION carried by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Dove, McMiller, Muhsin, Haynes, Pryor NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Willis ABSTAIN: None 3. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 22 (CUP 22) 11004 Atlantic Avenue, Juan Corona Applicant requests approval to establish a new restaurant, selling alcoholic beverages (beer and wine) in the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone. Mr. Fenderson stated that staff experienced a problem in mailing the public notices for this item, and upon the advice of the City Attorney's office, he requested that this item be continued to a special meeting of the Planning Commission on September 26, 1989, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. MOTION carried by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Dove, McMiller, Muhsin, Haynes, Pryor NOES: NoAe ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Willis ABSTAIN: None DZSK6:PC9-26-89 3 4. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 21 (CUP 21) 11330 Wright Road (Mohammed Kashani-Jou for . Lynwood Unified School District) Applicant requests approval to construct a Service Center for the Unified School District at 11330 Wright Road in the C-F (Community Facility) zone. Mr. Fenderson told the Commissioners that the applicant has agreed to provide 55 additional parking spaces as well as dedicate ten feet along Wright Road for street widening purposes. Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing and Mr. Mohammed Kashani-Jou, architect, 3600 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1820, Los Angeles 90010, rose to state his acceptance of all conditions. Commissioner Haynes asked how close the underground gasoline tanks will be to the classrooms. Although this question was not answered immediately, ultimately Mr. Kashani-Jou said the tanks will be only ten feet from the portable classrooms. Mr. Mas assured Commissioner Haynes that the Fire Department will make sure everything is safe and noted the Fire Department's conditions listed on page 4 of the resolution. Mr. Barnes suggested that Condition No. 41, stipulating that the Fire Department re-evaluate the proximity of the underground storage tanks to the portable classrooms and that the applicant shall comply with any requests made by the Fire Department as a resulot of this re-evaluation, could be added to the resolution of approval. This met with approval from Commissioner Haynes and the other Commissioners. . Commissioner Pryor noted that the location is not west of Wright Road, but east of Wright Road. There being no one else wishing to speak either in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposal, Chairperson Dove closed the Public Hearing. Mr. Oskoui discussed land taken away from the School District by Caltrans. MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner McMiller, to adopt Resolution No. 2290, "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 21 (CUP NO. 21) FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SERVICE CENTER FOR THE LYNWOOD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AT 11330 WRIGHT ROAD, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA IN THE OF (COMMUNITY FACILITES) ZONE," subject to the stated conditions and requirements, adding Condition No. 41 stipulating that the Fire Department re-evaluate the proximity of the underground storage tanks to the portable classrooms and that the applicant shall comply with any requests made by the Fire Department as a result of this re- evaluation, finding that CUP No. 21 will not have a signi'ficant effect on the environment, and certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate. DISK6:PC9-13-89 4 MOTION carried by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Dove, McMiller, Muhsin, Pryor NOES: Commissioner Haynes ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Willis ABSTAIN: None 5. Tentative Parcel Map No. 15467 - Case No. 9(TPM 9) 11400 California Avenue (Reverend Dr. Charles Floyd) Applicant requests approval to consolidate five (5) parcels into two (2). Mr. Fenderson informed the Commissioners that staff had experienced publication problems and Mr. Barnes recommended that his item be continued to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission scheduled for October 10, 1989. Dr. Floyd was present in the audience but it was deemed inappropriate to ask him any questions under the circumstances. MOTION carried by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Dove, McMiller, Muhsin, Haynes Pryor NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Willis ABSTAIN: None REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS There was none. STAFF COMMENTS Mr. Fenderson discussed the General Plan. Mr. Fenderson stated that Mr. B-Pessima has accepted employment in Los Angeles. Mr. Fenderson promised that a CUP update would be presented at the Planning Commission meeting on October 10. 1989. Mr. Barfield stated that Mrs. Kanka had intended to return in May, and although she doesn't know now when she will be physically able to return, she does hope to return at some time in the future. Mr. Fenderson discussed Water Well No. 10, and its replacement by Caltrans when Well No. 10 was coverd by the I-105 Freeway. Its replacement, Water Well No. 20 has been found to contain iron and magnesium. Staff is now negotiating with Caltrans about the cost of a study to obtain treatment for the iron and magnesium. PUBLIC ORALS There was none. _� . _ „� DISK6:PC9-26-89 5 COMMISSION ORALS , Commissioner Haynes repeated his.earlier request that something be done to show the Citv's appreciation of Commissioner Kanka, perhaps a plaque. He i•equested that this be agendized for the October 10, 1989, meeting of the Planning Commission. Chairperson Dove concurred with this request. Commissioner Haynes further asked for an update on the progress of CUP's granted during 1988-89, and the present status of same. He asked that that this report be given to the Commission no later than November 14, 1989, and Mr. Fenderson stated that staff would try to comply. Commissioner Haynes thanked staff for working under adverse conditions. Chairperson Dove discussed the lack of upkeep at the Lynwood Plaza. He found the conditions deplorable and Mr. Fenderson agreed that the property should be maintained. Mr. Mas stated that the owners of the Plaza have been cited under the Civil Code and the Sheriff's Department is also involved. Chairperson Dove stated that the public will quit going to centers that not maintained properly. Commissioner Pryor asked the present status of the bowling alley. Mr. Mas replied that there has been a change of ownership threee to four months ago an"d an irregular open/closed schedule is presently maintained. Commissioner Pryor asked how many excused and non-excused absences are allowed at present. Mr. replied that there is no official limit, at present it is up to the Commissioners' discretion. Commissioner Haynes replied that there is no limit to the number of excused absences a Commissioner may receive, but there is a limit of three non-excused absences per Commissioner. Commissioner Haynes requested that the minutes reflect that this was not his question. Commissioner Pryor stated he had called Code Enforcement with three addresses where cars were parked on the front lawns for street sweeping day and was told that five days will have passed before a Code Enforcement officer will be able to repond. Mr. Mas stated that the City only has the equivalent of two and a half Code Enforcement officers at present, and their first obligation is to address items that threaten the health and safety of the public. Commissioner Haynes stated he had requested three months ago that copies of the report given to the Commission by the Code Enforcement officer be given to the City Council and the Mayor. He stated his opinion that this report could be used to induce the City Council to grant money for more Code Enforcement personnel. Mr. Mas replied that staff now provides a monthly report to the City Council, however this report will be also given to them. Commissioner Pryor-discussed 11722 Atlantic Avenue and its use as a junkyard. Commissioner McMiller discussed the sales of trucks on weekends at the northwest corner of Santa Fe and Weber. Mr. Mas stated the .�.. .. -��City, doesn't have the manpower to stop sales of trucks, cars, etc., on weekends. A short discussion of Code Enforcement Officers writing citations followed. DISK6:PC9-26-89 6 Mr. Oskoui stated that the Parcel Map application has not been started yet, and his is very important. He said there is no way . the applicants can reach their completion date of 90 to 12o days from now since the Parce2 Map z;�;;?roval will be time-consuming. Mr. Fenderson stated staff will��work with the applicant so this Parcel Map can be on the November� 14, 1989, agenda. MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner Haynes to adopt Resolution No. 2291, "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO OPEN A RESTAURANT WITH ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES (BEER AND WINE) IN THE C-3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL) ZONE, 11004 ATLANTIC AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA," subject to the stated conditions and requirements, including Condition 3A, "Applicant shall consult with the Lynwood Youth Employment Program in connection with all hiring," and certifying that the project is catergorically execmpt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended by Section 15061 b(3). MOTION carried by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Dove, McMiller, Muhsin, Haynes, Pryor NOES: None ABSENT: Commisgioners Cole-Dennis, Willis ABSTAIN: None , All the people in the audience left. REGUALR ORDER OF BUSINESS None STAFF COMMENTS None PUNLIC ORALS None COMMISSION ORALS None disk6:PC9-26-89 4 ADJOURNMENT • MOTION was made to adjourn to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission on '.:.��ober 10, 1989, by Commissioner Haynes, SECONDED by Commissioner McMiller, carried unanimously and the meeting adjourned at 8:12 p.m. APPROVED AS WRITTEN this 14th day of November, 1989. Donald A. Dove, Chairperson ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Aubrey D. Fenderson, Manager pouglas D. Barnes Planning Department Deputy City Attorney � DISK6:PC9-26-89 5 i' f � : MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING I . PLANNING COMMISSION �M CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 1989 OPENING CEREMONIES A. Call to Order A. A special meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood was scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on the above-captioned date, but only Commissioners Dove, McMiller and Pryor were present. Lacking a quorum, Mr. Fenderson phoned the missing Commissioners. Commissioner Haynes arrived at 7:20 p.m., and apoligized to those present. At 7:22 p.m., Chairperson Dove called the meeting to order in the City Council Chambers, 113330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California, 90262. B. Pledge of Allegiance Commissioner McMiller led the Pledge of Allegiance. C. Roll Call of Commissioners Chairperson Dove r�equested the roll call, and Mr. Fenderson complied. . Present: Commissioner ponald Dove Commissioner John K. Haynes Commissioner Carlton McMiller Commissioner Roy Pryor Also present: Aubrey Fenderson, Planning Manager Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Community Development Manager � John Oskoui, Civil Engineering Assistant � Douglas Barnes, General Council I Joy Valentine, Minutes Clerk � Mr. Fenderson stated Commissioner Muhin was on his way and � commissioner Willis was unable to attend, due to a death in his family. He also stated he had been unable to reach Commissioner � Cole-Dennis and she had not contacted staff. � MOTION by Commissioner McMiller, SECONDED by Commissioner Pryor, I to grant excused absences to the absent Commissioners. i MOTION carried by the following vote: � AYES: Commissioners Dove, McMiller, Haynes, Pryor � NOES: None � ABSENT: Commissioner Cole-Dennis, Mushin, Willis � ABSTAIN: None � D. Certification of Agenda Postina Mr. Fenderson stated that, per the Brown Act, the agenda had � been duly posted. DISK6:PC9-26-89 1 � i CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: -f Conditional Use Permit - Case No 22 (CUP 221 1100^,.�tlantic Avenue (Juan G. Corona) Appl'icant requests a Conditional Use Permit to establish a new restaurant, selling acoholic beverages (beer and wine) in the C-3 zone. Commissioner Mushin arrived. Mr. Fenderson read pertinent information from the Agenda Memo, stating that the proposed restaurant will be located in the former Wendy's Restaurant building, the proposed land usage is consistent with the existing zoning classification, adequate ' parking is provided and a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties is not anticipated. Chairperson Dove asked about the alley and probable increases in traffic. Mr. Oskoui replied that vacation of the alley is under consideration, but this vacation could cause problems for the adjacent gas station. A short discussion about possible vacation of the alley between . Commissioners, Mr. Barqes and staff followed. Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing. Fred Dias, no address given, rose to stated that said restaurant will be part of a family seafood restaurant chain. Mr. Dias distributed brochures to the Commissioners. Mr. Dias introduced Mr. Galvas and the owner, Mr. �orona, who had been seated in the audience. Mr. Dias stated they are spending $700,000 plus the cost of remodeling, and plan to finish in 90 to 120 days. Mr. Galvas stated they will be open from 10 a.m. to 10 I p.m. and 72 persons can be seated in the dining room. � � Commissioner Muhsin asked how many people will be employed by the � restaurant and Mr. Dias replied that an average of 25 people are ! hired, four key persons will be brought in from other restaurants and the rest hired locally. � • Commissioner Pryor remarked that City employees, including the I Sheriff's Department and Fire Department personnel, are not required to live in Lynwood and stated his opinion that it was I not fair to require more of the applicant than is required of the City. , Mr. Sabino Miranda stated their preference to hire form Lynwood, i but added that they will hire competent personnel from adjoining cities, if needed. I Mr. Karefa-Johnson discussed the local Human Resources Bureau and � the possibility of hiring Lynwood residents. � Mr. Dias stated t�at 3$ of the gross sales will be used for advertising on Spa�ish channels. � Commissioner pove asked the men for their addresses. Mr. Dias I gave his address as 1701 W. Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90031. � � 2 I DISK6:PC9-26-89 i ! I _ I Mr. Karefa-Johnson asked their policy on serving alcohol. �;. Mr. Dias stated that managers are instructed, if someone orders `• drinks an�.X�.`:� tell them that this establishment is not a bar, but a restaurant. Mr. Miranda stated that they actively discourage people who only want to drink. A maximum of three drinks per person is observed and alcoholic drinks are priced so high that people will be discouraged form frequenting this establishment for just alcohol. Commissioner McMiller asked about the tables and chairs, booths, whatever. Mr. Frank Klojda, 133 W. Chapman Avenue, Fullerton, Ca 92632, rose to tell Commissioner McMiller that the chairs are moveable, not fixed, and can be moved to accomodate the handicapped, high chairs, etc. Mr. Humberto Galvas, 1701 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90026, gave his address since he had been one of those helping w/the presentation. All men were seated. Ms. Margaret Araujo,�3126 Cedar, Lynwood, rose to state she represents a total of 15 people, all of whom wish to join in the request for approval of the restaurant. All of the people in her group have tried the food and she said it's great, they approved of the appearance of the restaurant they visited, and would love to have one like it in their community. There being no one else wishinq to speak either in favor of or in opposition to the proposal, Chairperson Dove closed the Public Hearing. . Commissioner Pryor stated the nearby signal on Imperioal Aighway, � turning left, will have to be longer if the alley is vacated. � I Mr. Oskoui stated this would have to be studied by staff, since I all Imperial Highway signals are set to relate to one another. I i , Mr. Barnes said any discussion of re-setting signals should be I referred to the Traffic Commission. Mr Oskoui said approval � would have to be given by the Traffic Commission, Sheriff's � Department, everyone involved, before any vacation could be � granted. Commissioner Pryor stated his approval of the project, and said j , he expects the restaurant will be a credit to the community. ; Mr. Barnes suggested adding Condition 3A. Applicant shall � consult with the Lynwood Youth Employment Program in connection � with all giring. Ms. Araujo, now seated in the audience, suggested the ROP, an � agency that operates through the schools. I _ � Mr. Karefa-Johnson stated the Lynwood Youth Employment Program is � a City-managed proqram. i I I i , I I I DISK6:PC9-26-89 � 3 I � � i I + Mr. Oskoui stated.that the Parcel Map application has not been started yet, and his is very important. He said there is no way :,; the applicants can reach their completion date of 90 to 120 days � from now since thP Pz;-n,��1 M�p approval will be time-consuming. Mr. Fenderson stated staff will work with the applicant so this Parcel Map can be on the November 14, 1989, agenda. MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner Haynes to adopt Resolution No. 2291, "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO OPEN A RESTAURANT WITH ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES (BEER AND WINE) IN THE C-3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL) ZONE, 11004 ATLANTIC AVENUE, . LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA," subject to the stated conditions and requirements, including Condition 3A, "Applicant shall consult with the Lynwood Youth Employment Program in connection with all hiring," and certifying that the project is catergorically _ execmpt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended by Section 15061"b(3). MOTION carried by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Dove, McMiller, Muhsin, Haynes, Pryor NOES: None r ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Willis ABSTAIN: None All the people in the audience left. REGUALR ORDER OF BUSINESS None STAFF COMMENTS None PUNLIC ORALS None COMMISSION ORALS None ADJOURNMENT MOTIUN was made to adjourn to the next regularly scheduled meeting-of the Planning Commission on October 10, 1989, by Commissioner Haynes, SECONDED by Commissioner McMiller, carried unanimously and the meeting adjourned at 8:12 p.m. DISK6:PC9-26-89 4 APPROVE AS WRITTIIV this 19th day of Noveml�r, 1989, : Y� Donald A. Dove, Chairperson ATTEST: APPROVE A.S Tp FpRM: Aubrey D. Fenderson, Nlanager pouglas D. Barnes Planning Il�partment Deputy City Attorney - M t 4 ;��E�fUA ITEM N0, -�- - ,� . -��, DATE: November 14, 1989 �� U � l � TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 19 Applicant: Reynaldo Li2zarraga PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to construct a triplex at 3410 Alma Avenue in the R-3 (Multi- Family Residential) zone. Currently, the property is developed with an existing single-family dwelling. On August 8, 1989 the Plannning Commission continued the item to its regularly scheduled meeting on September 12, 1989 in order to allow the applicant to address the concerns of the Site Plan Review Committee i.e. access and relocation of the trash contain- er. On September 12, 1989 �he Planning Commission continued the item for final review to its regularly scheduled meeting on November 14, 1989 in order to allow the applicant to present his revised plans as recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee. FACTS: 1. Source of Authoritv Section 25-4.2.A of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained for any residen- tial development in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone. 2. Property Location: The site is located on the south side of Alma Avenue between Century Boulevard and Elizabeth Avenue (Refer to the at- tached Location Map). 3. Propertv Size: The site consists of a rectangular lot of approximately 9,805 square feet (53'x 185'). 4. Existina Land Use: The site is presently occupied by one single-family dwell- ing. The surrounding land uses are as follows: North - Multi-Family Residential South - Single-Family/Multi-Residential East - Single Family/Multi-Residential West - Singl�-Family/Multi-Residential DISK 43: CUP 19 I ( � I � 5. Land Use Desiqnation: The General Plan designation for the subject property is � Multi-Family, while the zoning description is R-3. The surrounding land use designations are as follows: General Plan Zoning ' North - Multi-Family North - R-3 South - Multi-Family South - R-3 East - Multi-Family East - R-3 West - Multi-Family West - R-3 6. Proiect Characteristics: The property is currently developed with one single-family dwelling. The proposal calls for maintaining the existing dwelling, and, developing one two-story building with three units. Approximately 38% of the subject site is proposed for landscaping and useable open space. 7. Site Plan Review: On October 26, 1989, the Site Plan Review Committee evalu- ated the proposed development and recommended approval to the Planning Comm1ssion, subject to specific conditions and requirements. 8. Zoninq Enforcement Histor� None of record. 9. Public Resbonse: A letter from the Lynwood School District is attached. ZSSUES AND ANALYSIS 1. Consistencv with General Plan The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning classification �(R-3) and the General Plan designation (MUlti-Family Housing). Therefore, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 19, will not adversely affect the General Plan. 2. Site Suitabilitv The subject property. is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development relative to the proposed density; bulk of the structures; parking; wall fences; , driveways, and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, the subject property is adequately served with the required public utilities and I offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility. 3. Compliance with DeveloAment Standards � The proposed development meets all the development standards � required by the Zoning Ordinance regarding off-street I parking; front, side, and rear yard setbacks; lot coverage, height, unit size; and density. I I i i DISK 43: CUP 19 ! � I i i � . 4. Compatibilitv The proposed project will be located in a neighborhood that is substantially transitioned from single-family to multi-family residences. Properties located to the north and east are developed with a fourplex and duplex, respectively, and other properties in the vicinity are developed with multiple units. The proposed project is consistent with the R-3 2oning in the area and with the (Multi-Family Residential) General Plan designation. 5. Conditions of Approval The improvements proposed, subject to the conditions recom mended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. 6. Benefits to Communitv The proposed development will aid to aesthetically upgrade the neighborhood and will act as a catalyst to foster other quality developmepts. Moreover, the development will add favorably to the City's housing stock in furtherance of the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. 7. Environmental Assessment The Community Development Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15061 b(3) of the State of California Environmental Act of 1989 as amended. RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2286: 1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3). 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 19 subject I to the stated conditions and requirements. ATTACHMENTS: � 1. Location Map I 2. Site Plan i 3. Resolution No. 2286 ' ' I I I i � I DISK 43: CUP19 � � I � I � o , ` �'I�v. Q .\O+y �'.� ...' � _ `�, � n o ^ . W3AY OYN � Y NYS�n ' p . . U , iYl�py t.,r ♦ � ' . . o ^ �I ... I q : . ��, � W FY O9 C< II �� ` A3�JY /Z�api Z � � y . � 6«ry j 901C os or o9 m san wav �eo � oos on ia:n . _ . • ctu �osC� � • o ; oe e.a . J U 1° o � '_ z „• � 0 0 p' ` �„.c„�o„^onnoJ.' „°�• n_� h. o � \ °.� . ry �' � o — — ' L ^, �, r•' � ` y ` _ o i .� 9f0YNln Ofl � 9S�KF . a A � ,� r � �.tii � $ o e Y/NNA!/�Y7 �_' \ ~ ` � � a , a o�ir�rn v3AY o � � n� � ? oi � o O o� is �i � / , o0 n � `' o 0 0 _—n— �� o � u�."' �C � h ��j�£ P ' � i.' v�- � ° ' `' � � . o � a �/h £� �'" ° o ° � � A � f� N Z .,�� i/,h£ I^ I � W w 1 � C � n UT6/ ° �,°� ; o - °f�ei h �_fB \ 2 �� 9C�_ ��i'F. � J ��C � � `� I IL [`6L Z J �L{C� N6(wi� � �hC w e ` 'P�h` — N ; �J/i£� � � � � `� � g Fhn —es/bC M . /��hE �o�,£ � � o � E s. �s �d£E � /� q � . 1 • — — = = . i 4 ' n tst v 7YiS£ ��i.s£ R 6 b£'£ B 5E£''�I� —^ --- � � >a�E J � �� ° m ��'�--- toh£ �- /Sff � 09 --1 �- `-. _ . w.anr mvr�rin„ g o �, _ : ��ioh £ � 5£F t ' —!r—�... — �36hE �—_.,�— —�_� a£� �/ Q � Q ' � -�7hr /ohF + �pOh£ I CB i�� /SdE'�" S%P£ � aor 00 I U 0 � N �G�£�£ htl e'� �8F£ n h_ C££ a'°u�' ' ¢' �A4 /6££ „ Y sz�` J -S'GF£ o � 9LE£ k' - � O O � � � Q °'n' °I8E£ L ^ :✓�BEE � �,- . 7E£ Ss:: ' � u f'9£f o net� a i4 " � Q ^' n e � — � _ J -`� 1J. hBEf �8££ o ti nOdC� �7£F n 4� fi9�'f e _' , J � i W3AY BYL77 ti y � m 6/` £� � � y ^r8£F LL£E /7fE ^N 0 ,. r � D2P' [2W` i� —�--- �'B o _— n v h I; ��iF. .� , �r�z vs�rv. � d�F� �cs£ n i ` oC�£ — e3iP y � e6fee SCp n LF£E . vs�r ss� � £�, � � as�r ua_ � °��£ E � ti 79£ F s h F£ „ � /� £ '�gf � �..e. ✓eMMY/Y � � R U-�-;_' � _ _s _ EE l°r.5'i' r.,�,. �p�££ � . — F h £� F ` � /S.S � £ �� _....�._......, , :r. . ;� ; � ,f _ :� " ; `. _ �, � � _ '•, ii , Y ' . � � ��. . . . ' ' � � ' .. .\f1C1� F�� . � ,�F � LYNWOOD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT f.,.,,� I�VONEIR C. BTEELE, Ea.D., SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOlS 11371 PIAZA ' LYNWOOD, CAUFORNIA BO4B1 CLIfFOFD A. KOCH �, , (t1J) E07�1/OS R556TANT SUPEPINTENDENt, �- BUSINE55 SERVICES i + 'I ' July 24, 1989 i� ._ :;...- .,._ i : Mr. Vicente L. Mas, Director Community Development Department City of Lynwood 17330 Bullis Road Lynwood, Ca 90262 Re: CUP 19 � 3410 Alma Ave, i Dear Mr. Mas � � We are in receipt of your letter dated July 19, 7989, relative to the proposed I construction of three apartment buildings at the above address. The pro- I posed apartment which will contain eight bedrooms is located in the attendance ; area of Roosevelt Elementary School. Please be advised that Roosevelt has an � enrollment of approximately 1,350 students which exceeds the capacity of the � facility, The enrollment of any additional students wili adverseiy impact the I educational program of the school. I If you need any additional information regarding this matter, do not hesitate � to contact me. Sincerely � �� ' ��' 1 Clifford A. Koch � ' Asst. Supt., Bus.'Serv, � CAK:rj � i cc: Dr. Steele I i � � i 1 r J 9 'i I ;;I RESOLUTION NO. 2286 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITZONAL USE • PERMIT NO. �,� FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THREE (3) DWELLING.UNITS CONSISTING OF ONE (1) ONE STORY STRUCTURE AT 3410 ALMA AVENUE, IN THE R-3 (MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD CALZFORNZA, 90262 WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 b(3), as amended; and WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for develop- ment in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone. Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and deter- mines as follows: A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Official Zoning Ordinance. B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public, health, safety, or welfare. C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current 2oning regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the Site Plan review Committee. D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. E. The proposed development will add favorably to the housing stock and will provide additional affordable priced housing in concert with the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. F. The proposed development will aid in esthetically upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in fos- tering other quality developments. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, � based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby � approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 19, provided the fol- lowing conditions are observed and complied with at all times. .+ � COMMiJNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable I regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform ' Building code and the Fire code. � I i i I DISK54:RES02286 ! � 1 � I I 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community development Department, Planning Division, for review of ' said Conditional Use Pern:��.: 3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City Departments. 4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, under- stands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance of any building permits. PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS 5. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving the proposed development. 6. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one hundred and twenty (120) days after the use permitted has been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised. 7. Construction shall commence within (6) months from date of issuance of buildi,�g permits. 8. The site shall be developed to a maximum of four (4) dwell- ing units. 9. Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25%) percent of the lot area. 10. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs com- bined with ground cover as follows: One (1) £ive (5) gallon �i shrub for each 100 square feet of landscaped area; and two i (2) fifteen gallon trees for each 500 square feet of land- scaped areas. i 11. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped � and shall consist predominately of plant materials except for necessary walks, drives and fences. I 12. A minimum of eight (8) parking spaces shall be provided. I There shall be six (6) enclosed parking spaces and two i covered parking spaces. ! I 13. A six (6') foot high block wall shall be installed along the � perimeter of the property, except within the twenty (20') I foot front yard setback. In this frontage, if built, the wall shall not exceed a height of four (4') feet measured � from top of curb. � 14. No side yard snall be less than five (5') feet. ' 15. Final building elevations, including materials of construc- � tion, shall be submitted to and approved by the Building � Official and the Planning Division prior to issuance of any I building permits. i ---- i � disk54:reso2286 j 2 � � � � 16. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer shall pay $1.53 per square foot for residential buildings to the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government Code Section 53080. 17. All driveway and parkinq areas shall be paved. 18. Accoustical construction materials shall be used throughout the units to mitigate freeway noise to the standards and satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. 19. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective material including shingles, woodshake, asphalt composite, crushed rock and other similar roofing material that is not reflec- tive, glossy, or polished and/or roll form type metal roof- ing. 20. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar material other than the reflective glossy, polished and/or rolled-formed type metal siding. 21. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the street dedications. 22. Prior to obtainiryg a building permit, the design of the exterior elevation of the building must be approved by the Director of Community Development or his/her designee. 23. Trash areas shall be enclosed by five (5') foot high decora- tive masonry walls with gates. 24. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in a consistent manner, including the incorporation within the side and rear building elevations of same or all of the design elements used for the primary (front) facades. 25. That the applicant submit elevation drawings to the Planning Division showing the exterior building design; including the specification of colors, and materials. 26. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent building. in addition, no security fences, grills, etc. shall be installed without the prior written approval of the Director of Community Development. i 27. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment, i swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical devices shall be located within the rear yard or street side I yard of corner lot. Such equipment shall be screened from � surroundinq properties and streets and so operated that they do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring residents, in accordance with the City�s Noise Ordinance I 28. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in ' sanitary condition pending construction and shall be main- � tained in a ncrat and orderly manner at all times. Failure � to comply may result in revocation of the Conditional Use i Permit. 29. If applicable, the facade of the existing structure shall be ± improved to the satisfaction of staff with an additional � material to window level which relates to the facade of the � new construction. Staff's determination is reviewable if � necessary by the Planning Commission. � `I DISK54:RES02286 � � I 3 I > PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS 30. Provide documentation that lots were legally separated to � the satisfaction of the Department of Pub�ic Wurks. After reviewing the documents, the Department of Public Works may ' require the submission and recordation of a parcel map or lot merger. 31. Submit a copy of property deed or recent title report to the Department of Public works. 32. Dedicate a five (5') foot wide strip of property along Alma Avenue. 33. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered Civil Engineer. Property is located within 100 year flood zone area. Pad elevations shall be 1 foot above flood level zone per flood boundary map. Also conform to all applicable codes per Section 12 1/2 of Lynwood Municipal Code. 34. Construct a new sidewalk, curb and gutter, drive approach(es) and required pavement along Alma Avenue. 35. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk along Alma Avenue. 36. Reconstruct damaged and substandard drive approach(es) per City standards. Also reconstruct curb and 24 inch wide gutter with required adjacent pavement. 37. Construct two (2) wheelchair ramp(s) at northwest and south- west corners of Alma and California Avenues. 37. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected separately. Construct laterals as necessary. 38. .Underqround all utilities. 39. Underground existing utilities if any modifications are proposed for the electrical service panel. FIRE DEPARTMENT � i 40. If security bars are placed on bedroom windows, at least one window for each bedroom shall have quick release mechanisms that does'not require a key or any special knowledge. � U.B.C. Sec. 1204. , I 41. Provide smoke detectors, (U.L. and State Fire Marshal ap- � prove type.) i 42. Provide approved 2A type fire extinquishers at top of stair- � way. Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered I to the applicant. - I I I � DISK54:RES02286 � i I I APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November, 1989, by I 4 ; � I , members of the Planninq Commission voting as follows: ' AYES: `�� NOES : ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Donald Dove, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes Community Development q�pt. Deputy City Attorney I I I i � _ � • I � � DZSK54:RES02286 � � � i � 5 � I I -°-'-�� p��":u�'� IT��i N0. �- � DATE: November 14, 1989 ;ASE N0 . GU � 2 -�� ; T0: PLANNING COMMISSION '" , FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 25 Applicant: Oscario Aparicio PROPOSAL: . The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to develop a auto service center approximately 21,000 sq. ft. in size at 10733-10749 Long Beach Boulevard in the C-2A (Medium Commercial) • zone. ' At its regularly scheduled meeting of September 28, 1989, the Site Plan Review Committee recommended that the applicants • architect redesign the project and remove certain land uses that were proposed. At its meeting of October 26, certain issues were sti21 not resolved and the applicant has requested a continuance to the City Planning Commission meeting of December 12, for the above stated reason. r ' RECOMMENDATION• Staff respectfully requests that this item be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of December l2, 1989. ' DISK 43:CUP25 _ . , I , � I i _ i I -_. • ..: , .. . j�iedraa iric: . GENERP,L CON'IRACII�RS 6976 Angus Drive, I.aUerne, CA 91750 (714) 596-1 � ,•' ; r �; C !':�._ _ i� .: ;'; October 26, 1989 -- ` / D•2 J . �`j ��:' _L _ . .1__ } ',' � � " 3 p �:� _ ��. --�� --- City of Lynwood - 11330 Bullis Road Lynwood, CA 90262 Attention: City of Lynwood Planning Commission Re: Conditional Use Permit #25 Location: 1OJ33 & 10749 Long Beach Blvd., Lynwood Owner: Oscar O. Aparicio We do hereby request a continuance of Conditional Use Permit #25 from 11-14-89 to 12-14-89 due to architectural revisions that are in process at this time. Thank you for your attention to this matter. �: "" Sincerely,, -� �il/ � William P. De Casas Agent for Mr. Oscar O. Aparicio WPD/cr ':::: i ; � ,�-.• �; - �!��NDA i`fEM Nd. 3 _ D T: November 14, 1989 T:' PLANNING COMMISSION CAS� N0 � �� FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: Variance Case No. 3 App2icant: Elias Ayoub PROPOSAL: ' The applicant is requesting a variance to erect a ten foot high monument sign in the HMD (Hospital-Medical-Dental) zone at 3654 E. Imperial Highway, Lynwood. This item was continued from the City Planning Commission meeting of October 10, 1989. At that meeting City Staff had proposed to resolve the issue by working on alternative proposals for sign- I age. The applicant and staff were unable to come to a resolution � and staff recommendation remains unchanged. I I FACTS: 1 1. Source of Authoritv i I i While Section 25.33 5.5 of the Sign Ordinance regulates the � construction of freestanding monument signs. Section 25-26 re- � i quires that a Variance be obtained from the Planning Commission I ; when, because of special circumstances applicable to the proper- i ; ty, the strict application of the Zoning or Sign Ordinance de- prives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in � the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. � i � 2. PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE i I The property is located on the south side of Imperial Highway � between Century Boulevard and Stockwell Drive. The property is rectangular in shape and is approximately 6,000 square � feet.(50'x120'). 3. EXISTING LAND USE I � The site is developed with a medical building and is sur- + rounded by the following land uses: � North - Commercial � South - Residential East - Commercial (Medical) � West - Commercial i 4. LAND USE DESCRIPTION I GENERAL PLAN I ZONING � North - Commercial CB-1 � South - Multi-Family R-3 East - Commercial � � West - Commercial �p . � 5. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS j i The variance request would allow the applicant to locate a � monument sign without the 150 foot street frontage required, � and to erect a 10 foot high monument sign instead of a per- mitted 6 foot monument sign. i __ � i DISK53:VAR3 � � I 1 j � ,, 6. Site Plan Review At its regular meeting of September 28, 1989 the Site Plan Review Committee recommended denial of the proposed signage. 7. Zonin4 Enforcement Historv None of History. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: 1. Consistency with General Plan The Proposed Land Use is consistent with the existing zoning being classified as Hospital-Medical-Dental (HMD) however the General Plan designation is commercial. This inconsistency will be resolved during the General Plan update. 2. Site Suitabilitv The property is not adequate in size and shape to accomodate the proposed sign as required by the Sign Ordinance. 3. Compatibility The proposed monument sign and height is incompatible with the height and type" of signs on neighboring properties, which � mostly are wall signs. ; I 4. COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Specific Findings: � According to the Data and Sign Plans submitted by the appli- i cant, all sign plans indicate that the proposed sign is a pole sign and not a monument sign. � I I Ordinance No. 1322 of the City of Lynwood with respect to i regulating freestanding signs city wide calls for a minimum of 150 feet of street frontage for all monument signs. The I subject property has a frontage of only 50 linear feet thus, � lacking l00 linear feet. Further the Ordinance with regard to monument signs in com- ! mercial zones allows signs up to 6 feet above finished grade. � The applicant proposes a 10 foot sign thus making a differ- I ence of 4 feet in height. t I Additional sign height may be approved for a commercial or r industrial center, if approved as part of a site plan by the p City's Site Plan Review Committee. However, under no cir- ! cumstance shall any sign exceed ten (10) feet in height or 50 I sq.ft. (per side) in sign area. � i The proposed monument sign and height is incompatible with I the height and type of signs on neighboring properties, which � are mostly wall signs. If the applicant were to be granted a 10 foot high monument t sign, the sign would only have optimum visibility from the � east traveling west on Imperial Highway. If one were to be traveling east on Imperial Highway one would not see the sign � until one got in front of the Medical Building. ; i DISK53:VAR3 � I I � I 2 , - , � After reviewing,the sign proposal, the applicant does not meet the findings required in Section 25-26.7 for a variance. Nor, are there any exceptions or extraordinary findings that would give staff the grounds to recommend the granting of a ��ariance. The Redevelopment Agency Staff is not willing to Il upport the variance as mentioned. (see attachment) The'property is a standard lot with no hardships experienced i that would require an exceptional privilege and does not meet the State requirements for findings of a Variance. Undoubtedly granting of this Variance would set a precedent in the city that would eventually result in the increased construction of signs of this nature, with visual clutter which the existing Signs Ordinance is trying to preclude. 5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Staff has determined that this project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended by Section 15061 b(3). Therefore, a Notice of Exemp- tion has been prepared and is on file in the Community Devel- I opment Department and the office of the City Clerk. I RECOMMENDATION I Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the I Planning Commission deny the Variance Request: I a. Finding that a hardship has not been established that � would require a Variance for Case No. 3 as determined by Section 25-26 of the City of Lynwood Zoning Code. j b. Finding that the applicant will not be deprived of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties I in the same vicinity if the recommendation of denial is upheld. i 1. Location Map � 2. Applicant's Plans ' I f � I � � i DISK53:VAR3 � � � _ �. _.._ ----- - � � . � 3 � i. � � �. � � . ; . : i � N ; � � i � ; -.. � � , �. : �: �- i � : _. ' -- �v - „y I ; r. •rf� °' , i ( ; , ., � , . ,�,�� .� a �,`\ ., �a M � b ' f � � . [ �� y � + �,� t ' O• i��i � n C 4. ' ' �ei , C � o rq � % S �, 12:� sa. . � . ' � ., �i �� n. � � n i o /� . �� ?�, " , 4 I.: ;°� a.e, �� rof S ti 1+�i � . •�. o�n � o�, � �M� : o�1/'r 4 `�ir o :. �„t� 1+ ', _ -�"� S ai rli�� A a �?r a oiireN �`��, I': � � ' � °$?'. a iec� nN �' ° � . � �' '� : e �+s � I � s�� ., a �� ; :: , �,,� T • _ . � '��'?::; . r` '� iq ; �, Q � � �� .::,^. �d � J�-. � . ... . a , .y, M ' 8 �� ` 4 \ 3.�� r � � 4. ,' �� a�� d � � � ��. � � • � = �� I `Q4 e �'+� � � �* ' I o � � t�� k��'� o � ` �' � 4 ' � r `� ��, �d F �' ' 9. " � e+ sc au 6u ' 7Y/113dM/ `� 0 7ilY NQ.Ldt�V �' a � � M Ei A � / I ' '07 � a'e a �_ � ��, �• ,�, ..•� �$ � `' �^ o - + ~ � � � _ � i � e � i ';; � ' .- , . , z . . � .... V oI m tf ./ I Obdo� w � ffa/6► ° �y,It ` µ o � i � • a • �o! � � 3 60� � � 4J 9 oc�.i ' • � � ' ola �i �� —^'� � e.� ' — 'rr - � " sv , ?v d r ... _ rt et � d�dW NOIl�d�O� MEMORANDUM September 18, 1989 TO: Jlubrey Fenderson Planning Manager FROM: Renrick Karefa-Johnson ficonomic Development I3anager RE: VARIANCE NO. 3 � The Redevelopment Division submits the following comments referenced the subject proposal in the Redevelopment Project Area A: . ANALYSIS: The subject property is located on the south side of ' Imperial Highway between Martin Luther King Houlevard and � Stockwell Drive. The request was recently denied by the Redevelopment Division staff because it did not meet the requirements of the city's sign regulations. � I The applicant has selected to file this Variance instead of I changing the siqn. The zoning ordinance allows a maximum I height of six (6') feet above grade for a monument sign. � The sign as proposed is ten (10') feet high. � The lot is a typical lot in the F�+ID zone (see attached � assessor's map). The applicant is correct is stating that � the property is setback further from the street that the other properties. However, in staff's professional opinion, � this is not a justification for a Variance. Staff is � further concerned that approval of this sign height Variance may set a precedent encouraging the installation of non- � conforming signs in the HI+ID zone. � Staff is unable to establish the Findings needed for , approval of the Variance. � SPECIFIC FINDINGS: ]►. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances � or conditions applicable to the development rite that do � not apply generally to sites in the same zoninq district i (I�ID), in tkiat the lot in question is a typical lot in � the HI+ID zo�•. � I � �I V16A:VAR3 I f I . i B. Granting the application is not necessary for the preservation nnd enjoyment of a substantial property right of the :?�,po7.tca^�. ,�rd to prevent unreasonable property loss or unnecessary hardship in that a sign with a maximum height of 6 feet can be installed on the property and wovld appropriately address the concerns of vehicle and pedestriaa visibility. C. Granting the application may be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements ia the vicinity of the development site, or to the public health, eafety or general welfare because it may set a precedent encouraging non-conforming signs in the neighborhood. D. Granting the application is not consistent with the General Plan and the zoning ordinance and would constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitatiou on other properties in the vicinity and in the same soning district, in that it would legitimize an illegal sign, thus encouraging installation of signs which do not meet city standards. It is recommended that this application be denied. � r 7tT4 I I I I � � f � I � I � I � � I ' � I I � V16A:VAR3 I I i � +� I .. I �o' � �--- - - -- i i � I i � . � � i ' I � - ; ' Z I ' � � d ► i -�� i r--I G J � � (L � � �--. r� G-: ; ; i � � o� ; � J � d �." � - � I � � j � � _, I � — --I i � � . I i u' � IRON �� I�J(� � j � I ��c�sT� �JID�v./.a.L� � --- -..__—.._._._._._.._..------:-__-__._.--.�._--_.-:-.-- ._.— _-- -.. .__ ._--..__ � _ �XIs��(. �� K��E,T i -'/89 i ° . - _:; � . _ . � Aftachment 1. , . : �; • � - � Attachment 2. � 6. ihe property is presentty Improved as follows: The improvements to the outside include a six foot high decorative � wroug ht iron fence, compietely new landscaping with timed water sprinklers, a re-sh.iccoed building with color blending into the � surrounding decor, a clay file decorative parapet roof, a completely redesigned iront with decorative planters, decorative wrought iron covenngs wfth new wood framing for the windows, a paving brick sidewalk on the side. On the interior, the forestry is being removed, the electrical system is being brought up to code, the carpets are all bein� replaced, the waiting room area has been enlarged, the planter area is being enclosed, the ceiling is being re-sprayed, all of the plumbing is bein brought up to code, walls are being stripped, wallpapered and�or painted according to the decorators' plan. I I I � I � I � i � - , ' i � � I . � _ �, . �, � AtFachment 3. Unnumbered item: Thete are exceptional or speclal dreumstances appllcable to the property InGuding slze, shape, fopoeraphy. location a wrtamdings in The tdlow�g reapect: The property is a naROw strip, two-ifiirds of the width being occupied by the structure. The balance 1s in landscaping surrounded by a 6' high omamental heavy wrought iron fence for security and aesthetic purposes. Having been completely remodeled, the site requires a sign calling attention to the offices. All of the other properties in the area have large signs or exposure to traffic. The building to the east is offset and has a high sign advertising its location. The building to the west occupies approximately the s5me positioning, bfocks the exposure of this Properfy to the east, but, because of the setback of the buildings in the shopping center has a lot of exposure ftom the east. The only parcel not enjoying exposure is 3654. The only exposure for this building is that from a drive by on Imperial Highway. This being the case, the recognition of the property by the sign aitached to the front of the building does not occur until you have reached the building itself. � I I . �� ' i I - I I I -_ � -�..�. � � . Attachment 4. 8. The granting of wch variance will not be materiaily defimental to the public welfare or In)urlous to the property or Improvemenis In wch zone or vlcinity In which ihe properfy l� located , for tfie foloNAng teasons: To the contrary, the permff, if granted will enhance the property and the improvements in the area. The sign design wiil impact favorably and augment the renovations made. The monument sign will be sufficientiy set back as not to block or obstruct the view or provide a safety hazard for anyone or any property in the area. It will be of such design as to comply with or exceed ali building codes and standards, providing an additional degree of safety. Further, if no easily visible sign is availabie, patients searching for the built�ing could cause a traffic hazard on Imperial Highway, by slowing on the throughway, while looking for the address. With higher visibility, and the ability to locate the building in advance, they could plan the turn into the street necessary to reach the parking area. Othen�vise, the reaching of the location, then seeing the sign on the building, concomitant with slowing down, being in a quandary as to where to tUrn would cause a major traffic hazard.) I I I � - , � � . � I � � . � _ ,. ' � � Attachment 5. I 9. Such vaAance Is necessary for ihe preservation and enjoyment ot a substantlal property righi of the applicant, because: Without the ability to post a sign that is visible much hardship . could be caused to the patients looking for the offices. In this case, a number of pafients, upon getFing discouraged about locafing the building would give up the search and find another doctor. This would substantially injure the overall business. � ; t r � � � � - . ' . (.- (- Aitachment 6. 10. The granting of such varlance will not adversely affect the comprehensive general plan, by re�on of the following: The comprehensive general plan calls for orderly growth and aestheticaily designed renovations and construction in Lynwood. The improvements already made to the location, including building, landscaping and construction are commensurate with the wishes described in the plan. Further, the granfing of this variance will not cause any deviation from the intent of the general plan for standards for the construction and renovation of the area. The sign for which variance is requested would be of - such taste as to complement the plan. ;:: , �� _. �- . Aart Asslnk l�ssatates T00 Border Ave. Torrance, CA 9U501 113-618-0182 ProJxt: Cltent: Job No.: � �2R.E f}-ckl,�a..l �j o<o /� ("T01JUh"1�NT S 1lot.� E"q'r' �1 /^/ Date: (�/�/� Sht No.: I.'f- 2 HSS s�-0 fl = lo �" I _� 2o ps� /.✓n.io : I � a f'° P tP2 P ��----- m -. ��(s)C3)<?o) ° 3 � . �i i . P� _<�> !9) �?o) = �to� P _ �� S �_�� N � ; , ' --J- _ I x° 3a�(�y.$) -l- i�o(12) = 13�3� p � -(tao �� A � — `{"' oiA x /� < <jl�o<t� �03) a Co. 27 � �. ° Aszn C�,�c� i �� ; p�� Z�syy� �'� : �US� A3� G+� 6� � P i.a. n - . - �' G.2� / 7� �J 3 I O X20 � � — `.2g"!/� . '�EnE9�AL �5. 2 �1?,3� � I � ev+6Er s �aeja�'��s'� , ! Q" t� �, ��.�o��`.' Sw�.�Y ., cls� `f'¢ f?�c.e � '�� ;N �. , 3��f �R/�i�lE 'd�. � �- SE� A77a u�� G�a�and7�/'- �oT�.: -- �aesTAL ��s� �AL�-s�s ,� 1'0 �E: 5 u�+P+o u�a�o 8 ,, ,,, ��.�Tr�.,. Y q= s ,�rl. G�217F,/LA � �se �� -�' P p,�,E.��. � �� o� . f�G /'°c.� P,� uec. - r�r.�.e 2y.g ,��-,�- 4 �: � � : �8 T�+� �xT. ��ra ...•.,•.. - •�' ;�=css� i` f'�AST�Y� , �'s�'`%. I '<<;•' :.S•�;•.,<S`�; . v - !L�c 4 z-�� . ; � .• ,.�.•. ; 4 ; s : �1.3�.� '; ;� : �P • ;; 4-" � P � �� . _ _ - �' 7 = CO I.. '" _ _ 'Lo�x 20 �°FD EST,q i.. - . :,,, , _,`; ,`;= , ' la4S� ��`�OI.�� ^ Cr�' .,4 �.� . _ � .riT l �� II�II ,.....;�,�•'' � ; �,.. . _ • - • � . �. � PP.GE : �L o/ 2. PROJECT: ----------- SU BJ EC? : -------- ---- BY : DP.TE : RE�UIREMENTS FOR EMBEDDED POLES Per U_B.0 2907 (f) 1 LOCATION : sign pole AL�OWA.BLE STRESSES : ? P.11owable Passive Press�re (Laterzl) = 200 psf / fit of depth > Maxim.im P.11owable Passive Pressure = 2000 psf : For No Limi*_ Enter -? 0 ? Do�.s Lateral Restraint at Grc�nd S�rfzc= Exist? Y=1 N=0 . 0 ? Laad D�ratim Factor = 1.33 r LO.e.DING De.TA. : �. > P.pplied Point Load = 460 SI Point �aad > Load Height a�ve Base = 13.63 fit Moment @ Base = 6,270 fit-ii . > llniform Lateral Load = 0 tt/ft Uniform Load ? Dist. from Base to B*_m. = Q ft Mornent @ Base = 0 ft-St ? Dist. fircm Base te Top = 0 4t Total hbrnent = 6,270 fit-St ? POLE TYPE : 1=> Ra.md 2=? Rectangular : 1 > POLE WIDTH NORMe.L TO FORCE = 7F in MINIMJM REQUIRED EMBEOMENT : Non-Restrained : Depth =P,/2 (1+(1+4.36h/A)'.5) = 6.50 ft where: A: 2.34P/(S1 6) Restrained : D_pth =( 4.25 P h/ S? b)".5 = NP.ft LATERs.L PRESSURES : Allowable 0 1/3 of Embedment = 433 psf Actual @ 1/3 of Embedrt�t = 408 psf A.11avable @ Base ofi Embedment = 1,271 psf A.ctual @ Base of Embedment = NP. psf Su�face Restraint Force = NA tt � • I .. ' r. � � r � . � � ` �: ' _ - , ; . � � , � �, I . �T--"., y � /`t�'.ti��.�.�l.�.i,�. ��\� � `/ ' 12-�,��°� - `' tf r - . � � •� r1L.: �� !: ��• r � � ' � \�` •�^�'� �iv ��y .� �'� � . � . ( I ��„'l��r>3 { � �'�� I � ° `O% . 1 � i i I � /L�C 4 -� � v i/ ,P•T• i �lZ// �(2�c'C X10�Lo:acr �y G �A � c.� P, til � si ' � - ' ' o _� �> c .� • � . — � :,� ". I _ - � �_ a �N.ATv? co?�AO� t� `` � - _ , I , � � ' :�� I a � � - a � � �� Yo jc? 24" H�cor{ f . _ � � . �ouc.BAS� y � � 'l,p�' . � az � � I I. i _ �� t= ��-�-�,� L. "�" I ,-: -- ; / �'. _ z'� � ; . .. ----� � � �. ��: irEM No. _-�..._..�. ; ; !' ;S : N0. z___�a_.s ' � DATE: November 7, 1989 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT CASE NO. 5 ESTABLISHING A CEQA MONITORING PROGRAM FOR DISCRETION- ARY DE�IEIAPMENT PROJECTS, PREMITS CITYWIDE PROPOSAL: Staff is proposing to add to Chapter 25, the official Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lynwood; to provide a CEQA monitoring program for discretionary development projects and permits City- wide. FACTS• The State of California has adopted a new law, effective this year (AB-3180) which requires all public agencies to adopt re- � porting or monitoring Programs when they approve projects subject to environmental impact reports or negative declarations. The , monitoring program is to ensure compliance with project implemen- tation, and that prescribed mitigation measures are completed. Attached is a copy of the monitoring program as composed by the City Attorney's office. The program uses a checklist approach and requires a designated city official be chosen to oversee the program. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The proposed amendment is exempt from the provisions of State ' CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3) and is on file in the Community Development Department. RECOMMENDATION• Staff respectfully requests, that after consideration, the Plan- ning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2302. a. The project is exempt from the provisions of State CEQA Guidelines, as amended by Section 15061 b(3). b. Recommend that the City Council approve the findings in Resolution No. 2302, waive the reading and introduce � the proposed ordinance amendment. I I Dlsk 43:ZOA5 i f � I - i � i � i t i, � I. I 1 i ( RESOLUTION NO. 23D2 A RSOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADDING SECTION 25-32-(4), CREATING A CEQA MONITORING PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, „ did, pursuant to law, conduct a public hearing on a proposed amendment to the Lynwood Municipal Code with respect to the above subject;,and _ WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; �and . WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the project is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA . Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3) and is on file in the Community Development Department and the office of the City , Clerk. � :' SECTION 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and deter- mines as follows: A. The proposed amendment will be consistent with the objec- tives and the development policies of the City of Lyn- wood. B. The proposed amendment will not unreasonably constrain the use of property by landowners and developers. C. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the � General Plan. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby recomends City Council adoption of the proposed amendment. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November, 1989, by the members of Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: NOES: , � ABSENT: ABSTAIN• , Donald Dove, Chairman APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas Barnes Community Development Dept. �eneral Counsel Disk 43: Reso2302 1 . . ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ' CITY OF LYNWOOD AMENDING CHAPTER 25, THE OFFICIAL ZONING ORDINANCE, OF THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING SECTION 25-32.4 CREATING A CEQA MONITERING PROGRAM FOR DZSCREATIONARY DEVEIAPMENT PROJECTS. WHEREAS, Public Resources Code 21081.6 requires that all public agencies adopt a reporting or monitoring program for projects within their jurisdiction which require either an environmental impact report or a negative declaration; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lynwood does hereby proclaim, order and resolve as follows: Section 1. Definitions. 1. Designated City Official. This term refers to member of the City staff chosen by the Director of Community Development to oversee and enforce the CEQA Monitoring Program. , 2. Mitig�tion Measures. This term refers to measures taken by a project proponent to offset adverse environmental effects identified in a draft EIR or a negative declaration. 3. Project Proponent. The person or entity which is developing the property of implementing a project which falls under CEQA. 4. Responsible Decision-Making Body. Either the City Council, the Planning Commission, or some other body or agent to whom the City Council delegates the decision-making authority concerning that project. Section 2. Monitoring Steps. The City of Lynwood's CEQA monitoring program shall consist of the following steps: 1. The designated city official shall use the draft ' EIR or the negative declaration of a proposed project to prepare , a checklist of tnitigation measures which need to be met. This checklist stiall then be given to the project proponent. ' 2. The project proponent and the designated city I ' I official shall agree on a timetable for completion of the i mitigation measures and for sending updated copies of the � checklist to the designated city official. 3. The project proponent shall fill in the checklist as the work progresses and provide updated copies to the designated city official as agreed in step (2). the designated city official shall stamp the date received on each updated copy and place it in the�project file. 4. The project proponent will provide written explanations for those mitigation measures on the checklist which have not been met. 5. The designated city official may conduct periodic unannounced examinations of the project site to verify the accuracy of the checklists already received. DISK52:ORDAIN I � 1 i I � 6. The designated city official shall report the following violations to the Director of Community Development who will decide what action to take: (A) Failure to provide updated checklists on time. (B) Approve the report and checklists and certify that all of the project mitigation measures have been met. (C) Any other conditions which the Director of Community Development should be aware of. 7. The designated city official shall prepare a report after the checklist has been completed. This report may include information of deficiencies, corrective measures taken, and suggestions for more effective mitigation measures. The designated city official shall then forward this report, along with the checklists, to the responsible decision-making body � (i.e., the City Council or the Planning Commission) for its approval. 8. The responsible decision-making body shall do one of the following: (A) AppYbve the report and checklists and certify that all of the project mitigation measures have been met. (B) Resubmit the report and checklists to the designated city official along with instructions to ensure that the project proponent does meet the mitigation measures. The preceding eight step process will be satisfactory in most cases involving either a negative declaration or a simple EIR. If a proposed project involves a highly complex, EIR the city may hire an outside consultant to monitor the project. Section 3. Change of Ownership. When an owner of . project site subject to section 2 transfers any part of the property to another entity or person, the original owner must notify the designated city official. Such notification shall include the following: (A) Full name of the entity or person to whomm the . property is being transferred; (B) Property interest which is being transferred (i.e, fee simple, easement, etc.); (C) Date upon which the transfer shall take place. ' The entity or person to whom the property interest is transferred must sign a statement stating that it understands the mitigation measures which must be satisfied and that it promises to satisfy those mitigation measures to the same extent as the original owner and the City agreed upon. • I DISK52:ORDAIN I , • SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance, or the application thereof to any person or place, is for any reason helu t� be irivalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision ' shall not a£fect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or it application to other persons or places. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that • any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses; phrases or portions, or the application thereof to any person or place, be declared inyalid or unconstitutional. First read at regular meeting of the City Council of said , City held on the day of , ' 1989, and finally adopted and ordered published at a meeting of said Council held on the day . of � , 1989 by the following vote: . � AYES: : NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: , PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS day of , 1989 , EVELYN M. WELLS, Mayor ' ATTESTt Andrea L. Hooper, City Clerk - APPROVED A5 TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: - HENRY S. BARBOSA, City Attorney Charles C. Gomez City Manager DISK52:ORDAIN _ . --,`��:- ��N�A 1fiEM Nt�. : � � ' CAS� N0. Gu�' z� DATE: November 14, 1989 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Vincente L. Mas, Director SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 26 Applicant: Alexis Galindo � �ROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop three two-story Townhouses at 12426 Harris Avenue, in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. FACTS• � 1. SOURCE OF AUTHORITY Section 25-42 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a Conditional UsE Permit be obtained in order to build or relocate dwelling units in the R-2 zone. 2. PROPERTY LOCATION AND SIZE The property is located on the east side of Harris Avenue between Carlin Avenue and Olanda Street. The property is retangular in shape and is approximately 10, 899 square feet (63' x 173'). 3. EXISTING LAND USE The property is presently developed with a single family house, which will be demolished to allow for the new development. The surrounding land uses comprise of a mixture of residential land uses which are as follows: North - Residential East - Residential South - Residential West - Multi-Family Residential 4. LAND USE DESCRIPTION GENERAL PLAN ZONING North - Townhouse & Cluster Housing R-2 South - Townhouse & Cluster Housing R-2 East - Townhouse & Cluster Housing R-2 � West - Townhouse & Cluster Housing R-2 i 5. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS I The applicant proposes to build two two-bedroom units and a � one three-bedroom unit. Each unit will be provided with a i two-car garage. For each of the two-bedroom units, the � living room, dining area, kitchen, and breakfast area will I be located on the first floor while two-bedrooms and two �- full baths will be provided on the second floor. The i three-bedroom unit will be composed of a living room, i dining area, kitchen, den and a 3/4 bath on the first floor. The second floor will be composed of three-bed- � rooms and two-full baths. Approximately thirty (30�) � percent of the land is designeated for landscaping. � i disk57:cup26 i i , � � 6. SITE PLAN REVIEW At its regular meeting of October 26, 1989 the Site Plan Review committe recommended approval to the Planning Commission with specific conditions. 7. ZONING ENFORCEMENT HISTORY None of Record 8. PUBLIC RESPONSE None of Record ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION 1. Consistency With General Plan The property is consistent with the existing zoning classification (R-2) and the General Plan designation (Townhouse & Cluster Housing). Therefore, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 26 will not adversely affect the lynwood General Plan. 2. Site Suitabilitv, The property is adequate in size and shape to accomodate the proposed development relative to density, bulk of the structures, parking, walls, fences, landscaping, driveways , and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. The property is adequately served with the required public utiolites and offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility. 3. ComAatibilitv The proposed development is surrounded by moderate density residential developments. Therefore, the project will be compatible with developments in the area. 4. Compliance With Development Stnadards The proposal meets all of the development standards required by the Zoning Ordinance with respect to parking; front, side, and rear-yard setbacks,; distance between structures; lot coverage; open space and landscaping; building height; unit size and density. 5. Conditions Of AAproval The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions recommended bby the Site Plan Review Committee, would neither have a negative effect nor would it interfere with the values of the surrounding properties or endanger the public healtri, safety or welfare. 6. Benefits To Communitv � The proposed development will aid to aesthetically upgrade I the neighborhood and act as a catalyst in fostering other -- quality developments. furthermore, it will add favorable i to the City's housing stock and provide additional affordably-priced housing in furtherance of the policies of I the Housing Element of the General Plan. I disk57cup26 I � I ,� i . I 7. Environmental Assessment The Community Development Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15061 3(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act of 1989 as amended. RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2298: 1. Certifying that the project is catergorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3). 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 26, subject to the stated conditions and requirements. Attachments• 1. Location Map 2. Resolution No. 2298 3. Plot Plan r . � I I � I � _ �- ' -- � I disk57:cup26 � � � ! i I I � LOCATIC�N iVIAP . . , __. _�zla - .. . _ z. ... Y .. ,,,.,�b. ee - . . -- .. AVENUE . .. ,�� ,- .. .,. - a riev ..... � 3 ALVADA d ST. � ro r ri �ro '- w �� '� a� �� rex � �:iN 1 � . T —��--y`w S 1' �t 4 :iw ^^ I I �. . �O � , �..�• .`y� C , .i Zl 7! Jt N. un o l I � �i � v , b I (i� S �v_ le1 rt 'T U n �J I � �� ti � t5 � irl q� )IDi W uN• �)� I � . . _ _1�2� � i I 70 �� 16 ` � I i � N �^_ �w � I �iv� � •n�i e � � '. . � — ,—..� � I �. :.� ° n � � � .� ��L � ��„r �_ I � q � 4 . �� J j 6 �, I � AT�� I PORTiJti LOh 2 '� '^ is . � �P �0i j �? .. y :'7 I'� i � 'v �� YI� s� � �: M ' � i �: � • a Cf 7T �9 /)c a �5 � � : a�� L i .. �i4' � L. �� ... � 2 � � C��`—� " . �� 10 �:� � f Jr�3St IiSf � s N� lzlf� � n� n sS.lT [fIf bXd f/Je . � � 7 io " J,Y BU�L/ n�n S�� + • � � � - o �� r � A �ORTiOnI � F/ 1 3 �� / 1� 3 �� i' 7 3� �: 6� 3 W ; � LOT� 7 � ` � o r.:w ��..s � ' � � (O fO 8ft w 4: if u A Z x�+� ��.� �� TR'ACT� . .. i�. a m�... ly� . v W ier � rs � rs sr � rs 9 n..r� .�.. m Yr i ` � a u� . 6 L_ � .. . . I' � R C n � ' 7a 46.D9 w '/ .�i �3 ll.� 7� u ... �� n� .v�� Q � \ K , i� � � 0 `� r� r�r`Ko is �ie t1 Z` S Z Q� sa.. S 5 ,,..e ' 66 . �y� •� . � � . naz� .,. . 6 n�vi �a. > 6S ra e' o fl s.vi ° n� 9^� i� �, 6 ,. � � . 6 � AVENUE e : p ,.,,' ,. � � .,.» R'. .� 64 - ��'� ;° 3° _n�.� ' �i� C = 7 C ��'� b 7 8 �>.�v' :.v 63 � � � : A . � . `� _ �..., „« � .. s O� 1F ` 4 ' � E io u\� iT�io� ii �'is ae. ...so 62 , e e, � g • 8 9„o. _ , ..., ,,,m c � \ ' SO /St1 • r . I SO' F >o � J.N f� /� v� T� .�x6� ,s.. .:. .,r y ,.,>. • . m 9 {.'` . V � v�oe /� � '� � . . /O �� /O /Z 0 . ..o� � S ,. , 59 �� . `// .or // .is�. ' ! W . .. �n,� �� :aas � .uu � Q N 1 �? ..,>, ' � ' 2 P �� .�>„ ' � ' S7 -� � � � ,�s�. 0 ,. ».. J ' .I /3 .�e,e� Q . �� 5,,.�t • J 56 � n n..r io�m . � (A � Ha = ' :si� ns�s Q ,� v w fr o�r � � u�n 3 . �55 Q .. .. � �vr.�� sn �.�.. /j( � � �• V � � LQN A i ��Y in a„ s ae I r • �SQ ' . r—""�"'� � ` . . . �-� " V � I � � ' I I • I RESOLUTION N0. 2298 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 26 FOR TI�E CONS'�'p??�TION OF THREE (3), TWO-STORY TOWN HOUSES AT 12426 HARRIS AVENUE, IN THE R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE� LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, 90262 WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 b(3), as amended; and wHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for develop- ment in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and deter- mines as follows: A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Official Zoning Ordinance. B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public, health, safety, or welfare. C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current zoning regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the Site Plan review Committee. D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. E. The proposed development will add favorably to the housing stock and will provide additional affordable , priced housing in concert with the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. F. The proposed development will aid in esthetically upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in fos- tering other quality developments. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations,. hereby approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 26, provided the fol- lowing conditions are observed and complied with at all times. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building code and the Fire code. DISK43:RES02298 1 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or ' structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, for review of said Conditional Use Permit. 3. The applicant shall meet the requiremerits ._.` all other City Departments. 4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, under- stands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance of any building permits. PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS 5. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving the proposed development. 6. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one hundred and twenty (120) days after the use permitted has been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised. 7. Construction shall commence within (6) months from date of issuance of building permits. 8. The site shall be developed to a maximum of three (3) ' dwelling units. � 9. Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25g) percent of the lot area. 10. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs com- bined with ground cover as follows: One (1) five (5) gallon shrub for each 100 square feet of landscaped area; and two (2) fifteen gallon trees for each 500 square feet of land- scaped areas. • 11. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped and shall consist predominately of plant materials except for necessary walks, drives and fences. . 12. A minimum of eight (8) parking spaces shall be provided. There shall be six (6) enclosed parking spaces, one covered and one uncovered parking space. , 13. A six (6'j foot high block all shall be installed along the perimeter of the property, except within the twenty (20') foot front yard setback. In this frontage, if built, the wall shall not exceed a height of four (4') feet measured from top of curb. 14. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet. 15. Final building�elevations, including materials of 'construc- tion, shall be submitted to and approved by the Building Official and the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. DISK43:RES02298 2 16. Before any building permits shall'be issued, the developer shall pay $1.53 per square foot.for residential buildings to ' the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government Code Section 53080. 17. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved. ' 18. Accoustical construction materials shall be used throughout the units to mitigate freeway noise to the standards and � satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. ` 19. The roof sha2l be constructed with a non-reflective material including shingles, woodshake, asphalt composite, crushed rock and other similar roofinq material that is not Yeflec- tive, glossy, or polished and/or roll form type metal roof- , ing. - 20: Residential structures shall have an,exterior siding of brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar material other than the reflective glossy, polished and/or , rolled-formed type metal siding. . 21. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the street dedications. , 22. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the exterior elevatio� of the building must be approved by the Director of Community Development or his/her designee. � 23. Trash areas shall be enclosed by five (5') foot high decora- tive masonry walls with gates. 24. All building elevations sha12 be architecturally treated in a consistent manner," including the incorporation within the " side and rear building elevations of same or all of the design elements used for the primary (front) facades. • 25. That the applicant submit elevation drawings to the Planning Division showing the exterior building design; including the specification of colors, and materials. 26. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent building. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc. . , shall be installed without the prior written approval of the Director of Community Development. : 27. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment, swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical devices shall be located within the rear yard or street side . yard of corner 1ot. Such equipment shall be screened from surrounding properties and streets and so operated that they do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring � residents, in accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance 28. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in sanitary condition pending construction and shall be main- tained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure '' to comply may'result in revocation of the Conditional Use - Permit. • 29. If applicable, the facade of the existing structure shall be improved to the satisfaction of staff with an additional material to window level which relates to the facade of the new construction. Staff's determination is reviewable if necessary by the Planning Commission. � DISK43:RES02298 , . 3 PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION 30. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered Civil Engineer. 31. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk curb and gutter and a.c. pave- ment alonq Harris Avenue. 32. Reconstruct damaged and substandard drive approach(es), per City standards. 33. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected separately. Construct laterals as necessary. 34. Root prune existing street tree and install root barriers in front of the property. 35. Install one 24" box street tree per City of Lynwood standards along Harris Avenue. Species to be Jackaranda. A permit to install the tree is required by the Engineering Division. Exact locations of the tree will be determined at the time the permit is issued. 36. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass. 37. Underground all utilities. 38. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all off-site improvements. 39. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any work. FIRE DEPARTMENT 40. If security bars are placed on bedroom windows, at least one window for each bedroom shall have quick release mechanisms that does not require a key or any special knowledge. U.B.C. Sec. 1204. •41. Provide smoke detectors, (U.L. and State Fire Marshal ap- prove type.) Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVED AAD ADOPTED this 14th day of November, 1989, by members of the P2anning Commission voting as follows: DIS43:RES02298 4 ti AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Donald Dove, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney , DISK43:RES02298 ' 5 i � � ^ f 1'��M Nd. � - ; � F� S � � !DATE: November 14,1989 '�� G(�� Z.� � T0: PLANNING COMMISSION ,. FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director Community Development Department SUBJECT: Conditianal Use Permit - Case No. 27 Applicant: Roberto & Maria T. Gonzalez PROPOSAL; The applicant.is requesting approval of a modified Conditional ` Use Permit to build six (6) apartment dwellings in front of a single-family home at 5225 Beechwood Avenue, in the R-3 (multi- : family residential) zone. FACTS " . At the City Plannirig Commissions meeting of August 9, 1989, the ., applicant received approval for Conditional Use Permit No. °• 880'51, Resolution Nq,. 2208, to demolish two houses and build seven (7) senior citizens apartment units in front of a single- family home. The total number of units to be maintained on the property was eight (S). New flood control regulations.caused the applicant to seek a change in plans in order to develop the subject property. ' Staff, upon recommendation of the Site Plan review Committee, recommends continuance of this item in order to allow modifica- tion.and revision of the proposed plans. RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully request that the Planning Commission continue Modified Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 27 to its regularly scheduled meeting on December 12, 1989. „ DISK 52:CUP27 , 1 :��; � :: :{ , � , ,. ��'�:��NDA iT�M NU..�=. � j DATb� November 14, �989 �aSE NQ � Ur ��-�i � TO: PLANNING COMMISSION i i FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director � � SUHJECT: Gonditional Use Permit - Case No. 28 Applicant: Amado Zavalza PROPOSAL• � The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit ' to develop two two-story dwellings at 3511 Sanborn Avenue, in the � R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone. FACTS: 1. Source"of Authoritv Section 25-42 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained for any residen- t,ial development jn the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone. 2. Propert�Location: . The site is located on the north side of Sanborn Avenue , between California Boulevard and Birch Street (Refer to the attached Location Map). 3. Propert�Size: The site consists of a rectangular lot of approximately � 9,000 square feet (50'x 180'). , 4. Existinc�Land Use: The site is presently occupied by one single-family dwell- ing. The surrounding land uses are as follows: . North'- Multi-Family Residential South.- Single Family East - Single Family West - Water Tank 5. Land Use Designation: The General Plan designation for the subject property is Multi-Family, while the zoning description is R-3. The ' surrounding land use designations are as follows: ` General Plan Zoning North - Mu2ti-Family North - R-3 South'- MuIti-Family-. South - R-3 East - Multi-Family East - R-3 � West - Multi-Family West - R-3 • �� ' �„�. .-_ . .. < � DISK43:CUP28 , I �' � , �' � � , 6. Proiect Characteristics: . The applicant proposes to build two three-bedroom units, ' which will comprise of two, two-st�ry dwelling units. Each unit, including the existing residence will be provided with -, a two-car garage. Each unit will have room and kitchen on the first floor. The second floor will include three-bed- rooms, a bath and family room. Approximately twenty-nine ° ' (29�) percent of the land is designated for landscaping. 7. Site Plan Review: On October 26, 1989, the Site Plan Review Committee evalu- sted the proposed development and recommended approval to the Planning Commission, subject to specific conditions and requirements. 8. �oning Enforcement Historvs None of record. 9. Public Resoonse: A letter from the Lynwood School District is attached. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS * , 1. Consistencv with General Plan The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning classification (R-3) and the General Plan designation � (Mu1ti-Family Housing). Therefore, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 28, will not 'adversely affect the General Plan. ' 2. Site Suitabilitv The subject property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed development relative to the proposed . density; . bulk of the structures; parking; wall fences; ' driveways, and other development features required by the Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, the subject property is adequately served with the required public utilities and � offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility. 3. Compliance with Develooment Standards The proposed development meets all the development standards required by the Zoning Ordinance regarding off-street ' parking; front, side, and rear yard setbacks; lot coverage, � height, unit size; and density. 4. Comoatibility The proposed project will be located in a neighborhood that is substantially transitioned from single-family to multi- family residelYces. Properties located to the north and east ". are developed with a four-plex and duplex, respectively, and other properties in the vicinity are developed with multiple units. The proposed project is consistent with the R-3 zoning in the area and with the (Multi-Family Residential) General Plan designation. DISK43:CUP28 5. Conditions of Aporoval ' The improvements proposed, subject to the conditions recom mended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or'interfere with or endanger the pubTic health, safety or � � welfare. 6. Benefits to Communitv The proposed deveZopment will aid to aesthetically upgrade the neighborhood and will act as a catalyst to foster other quality developments. Moreover, the development will add favorably to the City's housing stock in furtherance of the . ' policies of the Housing Element o€ the General Plan. 7.. Environmental Assessment The Community Development Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 150.61 b(3) of the State of California Environmental Quality Act�of 1989 as amended RECOMMENDATION: r Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planni.ng Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2300: , 1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt,from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3). 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 28 subject . to the stated conditions and requirements. ATTACHMENTS: � 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan ' 3. Resolution No. 2300 , _ DISK43: Ct3P28 . . . . �, . � . . .. . � LOC�►TION iVIAP _ q� 33'� j�y a� y+'� �� i � ti �t � m a 1� �, ��, ; '^ �w iqa ��7 i�s ��—. � w �tD M/63 ro 161 "/bim ro i� �is�M Msa is� w �� 3 � w � so i I I 1117: � Y/I/Y __ � i `� � � I n�� '� siur8 I I I � $ //l9 � I � ao i� �z "i� o„ i ias iq� i�„ icv ^ isn �r�i � ?� i t'►' �,^�j ,�� 4515�� tis r sa �nl cn js�s; `^ ��' y o �^ �� C . .. � .o ''u �s. u so eo $ 19, 3 3� 3� I � .�t . � M „�'' �� r i I � ... BEEGNWO00 ,. �. a.. � p �, . " � M1' y %r s' � �'° � � �r �° :� � . a � m M• M I� M �' �v� t�. ro(� `^ �� M � I^� M �� b� , ^ iw to� ada to ms r�r zqe z� roz �. rc� i,r�, " i�' j R -- I I' �� I � f I n � 3 � f � I I �� .�l „t�a � u� � �s� Z�9 �, t�„ i 1 � tn� \ vb p ,�zu� ' . .. i'o tae s.� w I ^• n �� ;li� C/TY .i:::�e{ ` '�^IT Mm Ir�q h ia � n I� ��~ i n �. .. .. , ^+ #::lp,':; ta x ' so so ' . ' SANBORN M . : - � � o a , � t° � a S � o i �° o m '�°. �o • � � . . . . . . ... 0 0 `� ^� 'e' � b v � .�a ° � ^ y "' M� ��r) s $ni ��''il n M M �n � In M I M n, I� ro �« � � vz z � vo ��er, e rq� tee ra� ta�C � z� za� :d� " � . ; �,�y i � I I i � . � :8 a' i , � . ..,, � i j �'��do � � I I '. .� i� 30i ib1 J�.7 " ^.ill 305 J!6 ro 3q7 �.i�B �^�3�9 ^.i'�0 .� • � � �� y � � � � , . � � ` � a � b � � a : ��' "' e,eu � ro �� 8 C b' `" ��'ro I'� M � n� � � � n m ro � ro r5, � .i�a�� . . � . . • MULFORD �{ � . . , � . 'vs� e3. s° cl � a - < ro �p, v ,y., ! �` � n- w � . .� .� . g � i� "\n � � _ N r�� ^� � I � rv I m � r �,1 � "i"� "' � � $ �.w'ya � !�4 .� 363 362 jbl ��0 ..iS.Y 3�8 � 'J�I 'J.�6 : � _ � :. , •J , ! � ! I �/ � ,. . � N „ . � � j .L______ . . � . ,� RESOLUTION N0. 2300 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE � PERMIT NO. 28 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2), TWO-STORY DWELLINGS AT 3511 SANBORN , AVENUE, IN THE R-3 (MULTI-. FAP9ILY : . RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD CALIFORNIA, 90262 WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and - WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent ' testimony offered at the public hearing; and WAEREAS, the Community DevelopmenE Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 b(3), as amended; and WHSREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for develop- ment in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone. ' Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and deter- mines as follows: A. The site of the proposed.use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls, landscaping, driveways and other development features • required by the Official Zoning Ordinance. B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, . will not have a negative effect on the values of , surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the public, health, safety, or welfare. � C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current zoning regulations and site plan submitted and approved `. by the Site Plan review Committee. D. The gran.ting of the Conditional Use Permit will not . adversely affect the General Plan. E. The proposed development will add favorably to the housing stock and will provide additional affordable priced housing in concert with the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. � F. The proposed development will aid in esthetically, � upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in fos- tering other quality developments. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, -' based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 28, provided the fol- lowing conditions are observed and complied with at all times. COMM[7NITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1: The proposed development shall comply with all applicable regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform Building code and the Fire code. 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or , structures thereon, sHall be first reported to the Community Development Department, Planning Division, for review of said Conditional Use Permit. � . disk54:reso2300 � 1 . ; 3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other'City Departments. 4.- The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, under- - stands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution p.rior to issuance of any building permits. PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS 5. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving : the proposed development. 6. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one , hundred and twenty (120) days after the use permitted has been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised. � 7. Construction shall commence within (6) months from date of issuance of building permits. 8., The site shall be developed to a maximum of three (3) dwelling units. 9. Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25%) percent of the lot area. _ 10. Landscaping and irriqation shall be installed in accordance with a detail'ed plan to be submitted and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs com- bined with ground cover as follows: One (1) five (5) gallon , shrub for each 100 square feet of landscaped area; and two , (2) fifteen gallon trees for each 500 square feet of land- scaped areas. 11. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped and shall consist predominately of plant materials except for necessary walks, drives and fences. 12. A minimum of six (6) parking spaces,shall be provided. All parking spaces shall be enclosed. - , 23. A six (6') foot high block wall shall be installed along the perimeter of the property, except within the twenty (20') foot front yard setback, which shall not exceed four feet - (4') in height. Construction of a fence in the front yard setback is optional (not required). 14. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet. 15. Final building elevations, including materials of construc- tion, shall be submitted to and approved by the Building Official and the Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits. 16. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer shall pay $1.53 per square foot for residential buildings to the Lynwood Unifiefl School District, pursuant to Government Code Section 53080.' I 17. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved. �,,�_ . � . -....�... ..:. . .. 4 . ' DISK54:RES02300 • z . I ` 18. Accoustical construction materials shall be used throughout the units to mitigate freeway noise to the standards and satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. 19. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective material including shingles, woodshake, asphalt composite, crushed rock and other similar roofing material that is not reflec- tive, glossy,: or polished and/or roll form type metal roof- 1ng 20. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar material other than the reflective glossy, polished and/or , � rolled-formed type metal siding. 21. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the street dedications. 22. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the exterior elevation of the building must be approved by the Director of Community Development or his/her desiqnee. ' 23. Trash areas shall be enclosed by five (5') foot high decora- tive masonry walls with gates. 24. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in a consistent manner, including the incorporation within the side and rear building elevations of same or all of the design elements used for the primary (front) facades. 25. That the applicant submit elevation drawings to the Planning Division showing the exterior building design; including the ' specification of colors, and materials. 26. All security fences, grills,,etc. shall be architecturally compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent building. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc. . shall be installed without the prior written approval of the Dir.ector of Community Development. � 27. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment, swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical - devices shall be located within the rear yard or street side yard of corner. lot. Such equipment shall be screened from surrounding properties and streets and so operated that they do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring . residents, in accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance . 28. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in sanitary condition pending construction and shall be main- . tained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure to .comply may result in revocation of the Conditional Use � Permit. + DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING 29. Provide documentation that lots composing the property were . legally tied together to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works After reviewing the documents, the Department of Public Works may require the submission and recordation of a parcel map or lot merger. r ,�..._ �_.� � � � ' DISK54:RES02300 3 ' 30. Dedicate a five (5) foot wide strip of property along Sanborn Avenue. 31. Submit a qrading plan prepared and signed by a registered - CiviT Engineer. 32. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk curb and ,gutter and a.c. pavement along Sanborn Avenue. . 33. Reconstruct damaged and substandard drive approach(es), per City standards. 34. Close existing drive approach and construct proposed drive approach(es) Per City standards at Sanborn Avenue. 35. Construct two (2) wheelchair ramp(s) at.Northwest and � , 'Northeast corners of California and Beechwood' Avenues. . 36. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected � separately. Construct laterals as necessary. ` 37. Install (2) two 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood standards along Sanborn Avenue. ' Species to be determined by Engineering Division. A permit - to install the trees is required by the Engineering Division. Exact locations of the tree(s) will be determined at the time the permit is issued. 38.. Underground all utilities. 39.. A permit from the Engineering'Division is required for all off-site improvements. . 40. All required wateY meters, meter service changes and/or fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the Public Works/Enqineering Division prior to performing any work. ' FIRE DEPARTMENT • 41. If security bars are placed on bedroom windows, at least one - ' window for each bedroom shall have quick release mechanisms that does not require a key or any special knowledge. , U.B.C. Sec. 1204. - 42.' Provide smoke detectors, (U.L. and State Fire Marshal ap- prove type.) Section 3: A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the applicant. APPROVE� AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November, 1989, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: , DISK54:RES023fl0 � � _ , 4 . � i _ .� .. . .. .. . '+ .. � �. . . . . � � t � . � ` i , AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Donald Dove, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes Community Development Dopt.. Deputy City Attorney DISK54:RE50230d , 5 ' , Q - - t�,u�►��ua �r�M �o: ,� `, . D TE: November 14 1989 �qSE N0 , ,��/I 2. �f TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 29 � Applicant: Leonel Paz PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop two two-story dwelling units at 3352 Elizabeth Avenue, in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone. , FACTS 1. SOURCE OF AUTHORITY Section 25-42 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to build or relocate dwelling units in the R-3 zone. 2. PROPERTY LOCATION,J�ND SIZE . The property is located on the south side of Elizabeth Avenue between Long Beach Boulevard and California Avenue. ' The property is rectangular in shape and is approximately 9,805 square feet {53' x 185'). 3. EXISTING LAND USE The property is presently developed with a single family house, with a proposed addition. The surrounding land uses comprise of multi-family residentia7 and_are as follows: North - Multi-Family Residential South - Multi-Family Residential � East - Multi Family Residential West - Multi-Family Residential 4. LAND USE DESCRZPTION GENERAL PLAN ZONING North - Multi-Family Residential R-3 South - Multi-Family Residential R-3 East - Multi-Family Residential R-3 West - Multi-Family residentail R-3 5. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS The applicant proposes to build two two-bedroom units which will comprise of two two-story dwelling units. Each unit will be provided with a two-car garage. With the exception of the existing dwelling unit which will have one enclosed , garaqe and one open stall. ' DISK: 52CUP29 ' For each of the two-bedroom units, the livinq room, dining area and kitchen will be located on the first floor while two-bedrooms, two full baths and a laundry room will be provided on the second floor. The applicant also proposes to add an addition to the existing dwelling unit which will consist of enlarging the existing kitchen and providing a new master bedroom with a full bath. Approximately thirty- nine (39�) percent of the land is designated for landscap- . ing. ' 6. SITE PLAN REVIEW At its regular meeting of October 26, 1989 the Site Plan _ Review Committee recommended approqal to the Planning Com- ' mission with specific conditions. ° , 7. ZONING ENFORCEMENT HISTORY None of Record 8. PUBLIC RESPONSE None of Record � ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION 1. Consistency with General Plan � � . � The property is consistent with the existing zoning , classification (R-3) and the General Plan designation (Multi-Family Residential). Therefore, granting Conditional ' Use Permit No. 29 will not adversely affect the Lynwood General Plan. 2. Site Suitabilitv ' The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate ' the proposed development relative to density, bulk of the " structures, parking, walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features required by the Zorring Ordinance. ry , The property is adequately served with the required public utilities and offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility. � 3. Compatibility ' The proposed development is surrounded by moderate density residential developments. Therefore, the project will be compatible with developments in the area. 4. Compliance with Develooment Standards The proposal' meets all of the development standards required by the Zoning ordinance with respect to parking; • front, side, and rear-yard setbacks; distance between structures; lot coverage; open space and landscaping;" building height; unit size and density. ,.��--- 5. Conditions of Aoproval The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions � recommended by the Site Plan Review Commmittee, would neither have a negative effect nor would it interfere with � the values of the surrbunding properties or endanger the public health, safety or welfare. � 6. Benefits to Communitv The proposed development will aid to aesthetically upgrade the neighborhood and act as a catalyst in fostering other quality developments. Furthermore, it will add favorable to the City's housing stock and provide additional affordably-priced housing in furtherance of the policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan. 7. Environmental Assessment - The Community Development Department has determined that the project is categorically exemgt pursuant to section 15061. b(3) of the State of California environmental Quality Act of 1989 as amended. ' .'RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2301: 1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3). 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No., 29, subject to the stated conditions�and" requirements. Attachments• ` . 1. Location Map ' ' 2. Resolution No. 2301 ' 3. Plot Plan DISK 52: CUP29 . . . . ' . . ' � • L . '.. . . . � 1, . . � ' Ti�J � e .3/j� i'� � <s� �, I 'Ll.f' . �.a� � I m ° o � . . . � . . � Yi .. ) nfr�-- s .I ^O�j_ M IJ . �i � — ♦ . � , q7. n . } 1/> � � � r y � ' i 4 n. � + v � s� ' � . i/�. - , � 3 'A � Ji J N< ;' p �l� 2^ i" I I o 1\ . . ^ ' � � 3ife� i0 ' 3iGl �. • � Gi \' y � y S.y P e• A �y` \� '• I . � / ` . . �PFACN _ u ...y_Ol/( � I . _ 50 \�� - i_ � . � \ STRfC u 11 { �w.o �-�. y � : 8 � �� I '0 �\ p r` � �, I i. � � �- „ � �� C � ;�\ � ' Y _y Y .o �o � L n \\ � > ! 3J.1 � � � � . , . . . . • i - � � en o� 3330 � �� h �3 O I. ' � M ° _� � $ C ♦ a � ec� s� o - c ?3 " 33,� , � o �� - � - = 3 � �\ I . . � . - E -e "� 3a 'e }J _'�'L8� 3339a � � .. � � , � ' - . � o a '+ i k 333s -��-~ �3Y3� " � e � —�Y - — —" 3sv; � ; 'FO w � " � 6 i� � 3373 � � k 3J39 _�,yo�, i yfg � �s � � K 3 a � 3xiaL 33,s/ , O . 33i/ 3vS ` -� � �� 33yy k y 3 '¢' 3 — � 363 , a a g 333� p E� � 33Yf 336 �� Z k � 8 a3zn a Px 3337 '>%,.:. '�. , aeS/ C � -�- 37a k }3� e)3] 7 -� 2339! �rc�'-'"_*��_"_3.,� ` ai��' 3 _� . � 3 dX' 33Y „ v - • ➢ ! � lc 3J3? 13 e 33�9 - : 33L/ $433��, - . —�'— ? _ s 3 a�y � 3a a.voy � i . C 373� 37� 3}f � � -�- `_�3="y ' , � \ S 33Y�3 ' =;3&e 3;,rf 33L �' 7 338�M� ,�, ? B 1 : ,. �v � . . - Y 33YS.. --3` "i -�� ' 33:'T �=3 p d e 239 � � � � � r 3353 - 3� 337 r � 2doi f � sav6 ' � _ : _ _��j6 0 3 _ -__�__ - " 339 � T . � 3JSS 33799� °t 33�. " _ �_d-gYJ F_3�� o °/ �/ � � as d ' 3aS/ � 3YOp"� 'c� i. 3d S� -�33�ps �� 338 "�T �.� " 3vo � ` ac 838a�s �—. �;�3?t� r� � 33 9 9. 3Y�o � y�arii � � � i . ° 33P6 - —� --�— . . . it 3� C 3386 - i. , . dro b, 3YOS 3Yi�/ ' . k dfi =� . I S - � � 33 �g 3350 � � �j F�3vcy�L 2 3Y]d. � � � � . S 3�gj � `�39J i � � 3y�R. � 3vj� --r-- ^� �; � h . . . _ �-� s � ` _s?3£ � ` �3 Y � ' 3Yd6 � e . ' � � sva � ` : � w y�(a. o ' � _ ., a ss � � 3Y ` 7 ��;'�� " = � _^ -� � a ' `'° ` '° " :vo o. e v -- a � 4' , •a ._n p � c � : „ n� V � . ' y I CAUfbwNU � . --�_—__" w B . , . . . o�. "_ j � . 1 � L � � su G. n:�.s ' " �. « . . . ' _ . � � ...:x , . : ._ .°_,a.°�� . . � :� . :.: ...> ._,. . . . .. .. .... -. :.. :: " ��. .' :.: ._ .,.. ..:.. ..._ ,..... ._. :.:.; . . . ,.. .. .. . . .-. .. -.:. . , . __...... " :.:. '-- _ . ..::. . :.::i..... ..: ..::.. . ., . _. ..:... � . ..- .. '.� _ . . . .. , ..... -.. .:._ .....,_. .. _ " - . .. ;. . _ . . ... . . . . . . .:... ... ...-. . .... ._ . , . � . .. - ... ..- . . .- .. _.. . � .. ... . .:._ .... .:. . ::: : . ..... .. .. . . . .�.. . . . . .-.. . .,-_ . ....- : � �. . ., :: . . . . . ._ ... _.... .. ..- ..." ' ': ' � . . . . . . . . . , , . . .. . , . ... . .. . . . . _ . .�. >.. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. ..... . . . ..... . . � _ . :�:: . . � .,... _... ......... . .... .� . . .......... ...... . . . . ' � � RESOLUTION NO. 2301 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMZT NO. 29 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2), TWO-STORY DWELLING UNITS AND NEW ADDI- TION TO THE EXISTING HOUSE AT 3352 ELIZABETH AVENUE, IN R-3 THE (MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD, CALZFORNIA, 90262. . WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law,' conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing; and . WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of, the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 b(3), as amended; and WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for develop- ment in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone. , Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds_and -deter- mines as follows: ' r A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and ' ° shape to accommodate the structures, parking, wa21s, landscaping, driveways and other development features requi-red by the Official Zoning Ordinance. r B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, .will not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger the publiC, health, safety, or welfare. ' C. The site will be,developed pursuant to the current zoning regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the Site Plan review Committee. , D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan. E. The proposed development will add favorably to'the housinq stock and will provide additional affordable ` priced housing in concert with the policies of the , Housing Element of the General Plan. F. The proposed development will aid in esthetically , upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in fos- tering other quality developments, Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby , approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 29, provided the fol- lowing conditions are observed and complied with at all times. ' �OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable i regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform . Building code and the Fire code. � _ i � DISK54:RES02301 I � I 1 I 2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community , development Department, Planning Division, for review of said C�nditional Use Permit. 3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City , Departments. . 4. The applicant and/or his representative shali sign a Statement of Acceptance stating that heyshe has read, under- stands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution prior to issuance of any building permits. ' PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS 5. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving the proposed development. 6. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one hundred and twenty (120) days after the use permitted has . been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised. 7. Construction shall commence within six (6) months from date of issuance of building permits. 8. The site shall be developed to a maximum of three(3) dwell- ing units. 9. Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25%) percent of the lot area. 10. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the Planninq Division prior to issuance of any building permits., The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs com- bined with ground cover as follows: One (1) five (5) gallon shrub for each 100 square feet of landscaped area; and two (2j fifteen gallon trees for each 500 square feet of land- scaped areas. 11. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped and shall consist predominately of plant materials except for necessary walks, drives and fences. ', 12. A minimum of six (6) parking spaces shall be provided. , There shall be five (5) enclosed parking spaces and one ,(1) uncovered parking space. 13. A six (6') foot high block wall shall be installed along the . perimeter of the property, except within the twenty (20') foot front'yard setback, which shall not exceed four feet (4') in height. Construction of a fence in the front yard setback is optional (not required). 14. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet. .� , ` 15. Final building elevations, incTuding materials of construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the Building Official and the Planning Division prior to issu- ance of any building permits. 16. Before any building permits shal� be issued, the developer ,. • • shall pay $1.53 per square foot for residential buildings to - the Lynwoo3 Unified School District, pursuant to Government Code Section 53080. DISK54:RES02301 . 2 � ., � � 17. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved. ' 18. T.he::v:t`af sha12 be constructed with a non-re£lective material including shingles, woodshake; asphalt composite,.crushed rock and other similar roofing material that is not reflec= - tive, glossy, or polished and/or roll form type metal roof- ing. 19. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar material other than the reflective glossy, polished and/or rolled-formed type metal siding. 20. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the street dedications. 21. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the exterior elevation of the building must be approved by the ,' Director of Community Development or his/her designee.. 22. Trash areas shall be enclosed by five (5')'foot high decora- tive masonry walls with gates. 23. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in a consistent manna,r, including the incorporation within the side and rear building elevations of same or aIl of the , design elements used for the primary (front) facades. 24. That the applicant submit elevation drawings to the Planning Division showing the exterior building design; including the . specification of colors, and materials. 25. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent . building. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc. , shall be installed without the prior written approval of the Director of Community Development. 26. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment, swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical : devices shall be located within the rear yard or street side yard of corner lot. Such equipment shall be screened from " , surrounding properties and streets and so operated,that they do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring residents, in accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance 27. 'The.existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in ' sanitary condition pending construction and shall be main- ,, tained in.a neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure ` to comply may result in revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. ' DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING i , 28. Provide documentation that lots composing the property were I _ legally tied trogether to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. After reviewing the documents, the Depart- � ment of Public Works may require the submission and recorda- j tion of a parcel map or lot merger. � i 29. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered ' Civil Engineer. � ; I 30. Dedicate a five (5 foot) wide strip of property along I Elizabeth Avenue. i � DISK54:RES02301 � , � - i 3 � I � � i . � ' .y . . c . .. 31. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered 'Civil Engineer. 32. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk.curb and gutter and A. C. pavement along E2izabeth Avenue. 33. Reconstruct damaged and substandard drive approach(es), per City standards. 34. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected separately. Construct laterals as necessary. , 35. Znstall two 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood standards along Elizabeth Avenue. Species to be determined - by Engineeririq Division. A permit to install the trees is required by the Engineering Division. Exact locations of the tree(s) will be determined at the time the permit is issued. 36. Provide and install one marbelite street pole with light fixture, underground services and conduits in front of the property. 37. Underground all utilities. r . 38. A,permit from the Engineering Division is required for all off-site improvements. 39._ All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any work. FIRE DEPARTMENT 40. If security bars are placed on bedroom windows, at least one window for each bedroom shall have quick release mechanisms that does not require a key or.any special knowledg. U.B.C. Sec. 1204 , 41. Provide smoke detectors, (,U.L. and State Fire Marshal approved type.) ° � Section 3, A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to the applicant - APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of November, 1989, by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows: AYES: I NOES: � � ' I ABSENT: - � � ABSTAIN: I � .. _ i i DISK54:RES02301 � , 4 I � � I ` _. .. .I Donald Dove, Chairperson APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney . w I DISK54:RES02301 � 5 i . I i , � � cit � ��'1�TWOOD �, ;��:. �IL�ME�l4C11� � ' �,�,,�� v1 Ctty vLleeting C6aQQenges �� I I I i LL " � 11330 BU�LIS ROAD . . LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90282 � " � � (213) 803•0220 � , � DATE: November 14, 1989 TO: City Planninq Commission FROM: Richard Ayala (Staff Member) SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permits Update (From June 88 to June 891 Per your request on the September 12, 1989, Planning Commission Public Hearing, staff is providing the P.C. with an update of Conditional Use Permits issued 'from June 88 to June 89. The total number of permits granted within that time span was forty- six (46). The following will show a break down as of current status of each conditional use permit: ' CUP'S comAleted CUP# 88029 No Certificate of occupancy issued CUP# 88047 Certificate of occupancy issued CUP# 88053 �� u CUP# 88084 No Certificate of occupancy ' . Of the total 46 Conditional Use Permits qranted 9� are completed, � 17o are still in progress, 30% have not pulled permits as of their date of signing the statement of acceptance, 9% are missing a statement of acceptance, 22$ have withdrawn due to inconsistency with the General Plan and 13% have expired. I DISK43:UPDATE � CUP�S IN PROGRESS CUP'S that are currently in progress and have pulled at_least a Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing or Building permit: CUP# 88042 -CUP# 88043 �P# 88046 CUP# 88058 CUP# 88082 CUP# 88090 y CUP# SSQ91 CUP# 7 CUP'S WITHOUT PERMITS CUP'S that have signed statements of acceptance, but have not pulled any kind of Building permit as of their date of signing the statement of acceptance: Statement of AcceDtance Date CUP# 88051 12-1-88 _ CUP# 88054 9-23-88 ` CUP# 88059 10-26-88 CUP# 88070 11-30-88 CUP# 88073 11-15-88 • CUP# 88080 10-18-88 CUP# 88093 2-16-89 CUP# 3 2-13-89 � DISK43:UPDATE � Statement of Acceotance Date CUP# 4 3-2-89 CUP# 6 3-27-89 .CUP# 10 6-22-89 CUP# 12 8-11-89 CUP# 14 '7-z6-gg ` CUP# 15 9-22-89 CUP'S WITHOUT STATEMENT,OF ACCEPTANCE CUP'S that are lacking Statement of Acceptance in their case ' files, thus, indicating applicant has not signed Acceptance or CUP has been denied: ' CUP# $g071 CUP# 1 CUP# 2 CUP# 13 CUP'S THAT WITHDREW DUE TO INCONSISTENCY WITH GENERAL PLAN CUP# 88031 CUP# 88064 CUP# 88067 CUP# $g068 - CUP# 88069 CUP# 88A74 � DISK43:UPDATE CUP# 88085 CUP# 11 Ct7P# 5(Removed from Planning Commission Agenda) CUP� 9(Applicant withdrew on own will) CUP'S EXPIRED CUP'S that have expired due to no permits not being pulled since one year of signing their statement of acceptance: Statement of Acceptance Date CUP# 88036 r 7-1-88 CUP# 88041 10-17-88 CUP# 88052 9-19-88 CUP# 88055 10-12-88 ' CUP# 88057 9-20-88 CUP# 88062 10-12-88 After reviewing the Conditional Use Permits requested and determining their status, staff has concluded to do the following ' in order to bring Conditional Use Permits up to standard: -CUP'S that are completed, but do not have certificate of ! occupancy will be notified by mail to take actionon matter. -CUP'S that have not pulled permits as of their date of signing the Statement of Acceptance, will be notified by mail to do so, before their CUP expires. -CUP'S that are missing Statements of Acceptance will be notified by mail to take action before their CUP expires. -CUP'S that withdrew due to inconsistency with the General Plan will be mailed a letter in regards to the new policy _ concerning inconsistent areas. -CUP'S that have expired will be notified by mail. If applicant wishes to continue with proposed project, he/she will need to re-submit plans. DISK43:UPDATE