HomeMy Public PortalAboutA 1989-10-10 PLANNING COMMISSION j 'a . ___"_...__.. . . ._'"_' . .
F ��
)
i . i �
9 .. ..—. �: — ,
� A G E N D A � . � �
'; LYNWOOD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING - 7:30 P.M.
City Hall Council Chambers
11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, CA.
y OCTOBER 10, 1989 ���� ?,��� ��,
r�;
� RE EIVED �
CITY OF LYNWOOD I
CI7Y CLERKS OFFICE
Donald A. Dove ��T u5 �9$�
Chairperson a � p� �
7i8i�il0illi12i�.�2�3i4
�
� .. .. ., :. �
�,�
� / _
Lena Cole-Dennis Carlton McMiller
Commissioner , Commissioner
John K. Haynes Roy Pryor
Vice Chairman Commissioner
Lucille Kanka David J. Willis,
(Jamal Muhsin) Commissioner
Alternate Commissioner
C O M M I S S I O N C O U N S E L•
Henry S. Barbosa Douglas D. Barnes
City Attorney Deputy City Attorney
' STAFF:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Aubrey D. Fenderson
Community Development Department Planning Manager.
Art Barfield
Planning Associate �
�
, I
_ �
DISK 47: AGENCOVR
I
�
�
;
,,
,,
t
':= OCTOBER 10, 1989-
:z ,
%;
OPENING CEREMONIES
' ; A. Call meeting to order
` B. Flag salute
S
, C. Roll Call of Commissioners
,
�
a
q' D. Certification of Agenda posting. '
��
� E. Approval of Minutes August 8, August 28, _,..
� .
3
� CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
= 1. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 15467 - CASE NO 9(TPM 9)
= Applicant: Reverend Dr. Charles Floyd
;
�
�
':� COMMENTS:
' The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Parcel
} Map (No. 15467) for the consolidation of five (5) parcels
;_ into two (2) at 11400 California Avenue in the R-3 (Multi-
�' Family Residential) zone.
�
,
� RECOMMENDED ACTION:
�'
�;' Staff respectfully.requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2289.
A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from
the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by
Section 15061 b(3)
' B. Approving Tentative Parcel Map (15467) No. 9, subject to
the stated conditions and requirements.
2. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 21626 - CASE NO 10 (TPM 10)
Applicant: Ahn and Han Architects
COMMENTS:
The applicants are requesting approval of a Tentative Parcel
_ Map (No. 21626) for the consolidation of two (2) parcels into
- one (1) at 12203 Long Beach Boulevard in the C-2A (Medium •
Commercial) zone.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
' 'Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2297.
A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from
the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by
Section 15061 b(3).
� B. -Approving Tentative Parcel Map (21626) No. 10, subjeot to
. the stated condtions and requirements.
3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO 23 (CUP 23� �.
Applicant: Carlos Roman Pineda �
DISK 55:AGENDA
�;
::; ;f
�s �� - � ' � .
=' COMMIIVTS: '
'a
�
.
�:�. The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop
six (6) two story townhouse dwellings at the corner of Fernwood and Birch
�, Streets in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone.
�,
� REC.'ONIl�4E[QDID AC`i'ION:
a
p Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Commission
a adopt Resolution No. 2294.
�` .
� A. Certifying that the project is categorically e�cempt fran the provisions
of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3).
�
' B. Approving Conditional Ose Permit No. 23, subject to the stated conditions
and requirements.
' 4. CONDITIONAL USE PF.RMIT - CA.SE NO. 24 (CUP 24)
_ Appliant: Carlos Roman Pineda
;�
COMMII�ITS:
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop
fi two (2), two story townhouse dwellings at the corner of Fernwood Avenue and
F Copeland Street in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone.
= RECONIMIIVDED ACPION•
r
�
' Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning Conunission
adopt Resolution No. 2295.
3
y
>
;. A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions
; of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3).
,
�
; B. Approving Conditional Use Peimit No. 24 subject to the stated conditions
1 and requirements.
; 5. CONDITIONAL USE PIIZMIT CASE N0. 25 (CUP 25)
; : Applicant: Oscar O. Aparicio ,
CONIl�NTS :
' The.applicant is requesting approval of A Conditional Use Permit to develop
a 21,000 sq.ft. auto center at 10733-10749 Long Beach Boulevard in the
G2A {Medium-Co�¢nercial) zone.
RECOMMIIVDED ACPION:
Staff respectfully requests that this item be continued to the next
regularly scheduled meeting of Nobember 4`, 1989.
6. VARIANCE CASE NO. 3(VAR. 3)
Applicant: Elias Ayoub
COMMII�TPS •
The applicant is requesting approval of a Variance to construct a ten (10)
foot high monument sign at 3654 Imperial Highway in the HIND (Hospital,
Medical, Dental) zorie.
"
:�
{ ��
.a • .
i1
:-; REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS
�
2 None
�
a
� STAFF COMMENTS
„
�
,
�. General Plan Update
a
' Commissioner Kanka (Award For Service)
;
PUBLIC ORALS
COMMISSION ORALS
s
ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
November 14, 1989, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall Council Cham-
bers, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California.
's
;
;
,
I
DISK 55:AGENDA
I
�
I
I
�
I
I
�
�
I
i
I
�
f
j
I
�
�
i
I
I
j
�
(
�
I
� �
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY, AUGUST 8, 1989
� OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Call to order
, A. The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City
of Lynwood was called to order by Chairperson Dove on the
above captioned date at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers
of Lynwood City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California
90262.
B. Pledae of Allegiance
' Commissioner Willis led the Pledge of Allegiance.
C. Roll Call of Commissioners
Chairperson Dove requested the roll call, and Mr. Fenderson
complied.
Present: Commissioner ponald Dove '
Commissioner Lena Cole-Dennis
Commissioner John Haynes
Commissioner Jamal Muhsin
Commissioner Roy Pryor
Commissioner David J. Willis, Jr.
Also present: Douglas Barnes, Attorney
Aubrey D. Fenderson, Planning Manager
Arthur Barfield, Planning Associate
Andrew B-Pessima, Planning Technician
Vicente L. Mas, Community Development Director
. Toufic Semaan, Civil Engineering Assistant
Joy Valentine, Minutes Clerk '
Approximately four people were in the audience. A new City
of Lynwood employee, Loan Phan, Assistant Civil Engineer,
was also in the audience.
Mr. Fenderson stated Commissioner McMiller had not contacted
staff or requested an excused absence so Mr. Fenderson
expected that he was only late, and would be present at the
meeting.,
D. Certification of Aaenda Postinq
' Mr. Fenderson stated that, per the Brown Act, the agenda hadr '
been duly posted.
, E. Approval of Minutes
Chairperson Dove asked for approval/disapproval of the
minutes of July 11, 1989
Commissioner Haynes commented that Commissioner Kanka was �
not replaced, as he understood it, but she is now ignored in
both the minutes and the roll call. He would like some
official action, either to establish that she is still a,
member of the Commission, perhaps on extended leave, or
something commemorative, maybe a plaque.. Mr. Barnes com-
mented that either extended leave or a commemorative plaque
would be appropriate, such a motion could be made. Mr.
Fenderson replied that staff would have something ready for
the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commis-
sion on September 12, 1989.
1
MOTION by Commissioner Haynes, SECONDED by Commissioner
Pryor, to approve the minutes of July 11, 1989. MOTION
' carried by the following vote:
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Muhsin,
Haynes, Pryor and Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner McMiller
ABSTAIN: None
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING•
Chairperson Dove suggested, if the other Commissioners
approved, that since Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 15
_ and Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 19 are to be continued '
to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning �
Commission on September 12, 1989, both could be voted on at
the same time. This met with the Commissioners approval, �
and the following vote applies to both. �
i
Commissioner McMiller arrived at 7:50 p.m. �
I
1. Conditional Use Permit - Case No 15 (C U P 151 �
11168 Louise Avenue (H. Leandro Morales)
' Note: Item 1 continue to September 12, 1989
Applicant requests approval to construct three dwelling
units comprising one two-story duplex and a one single story
dwelling in the R-3 zone. 1
2. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 29 C.U.P. 19
3410 Alma Avenue (Reynaldo Lizarraga)
Note: Item 6 continued to September 12, 1989
Applicant requests approval to construct three dwelling
units comprising one two-story duplex and a one single story �
dwelling in the R-3 zone. �
MOTION carried by the following vote: '
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, McMiller, �
Muhsin, Haynes, Pryor and Willis
NOES: None I
�
ABSENT: None i,
ABSTAIN: None �
Mr. Fenderson requested that Item No. 2, Conditional Use Permit - (
Case No. 12 (C.U.P. 12) be held as the last item in order to �
allow the applicant time to attend the meeting. Chairperson �
Dove, with the Commissioners' approval, agreed to the delay of
Item No. 2.
3. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT CASE.NO. 3 Z.O.A. 3 I
OFF-PREMISES FREEWAY-ORIENTED SIGNS CITYWIDE I
I
Staff proposes to amend Chapter 25, the official zoning �
ordinance, with respect to off-premises freestanding free- i
way-oriented signs, Citywide.
i
Mr. Fenderson discussed the proposed zoning ordinance,
stressing that the measurements will be linear, not radial.
DISK M5:PC080889 �
I
I
2 I
I
-- �
Chairperson Dove asked if the proposed zoning ordinance will
be more, or less, stringent then the previous ordinance.
; Mr. Mas stated the objective is to clarify the ordinance,
not to make it either more stringent or more lenient. He
stated the City Council desires to obtain Caltrans property
near the freeway for park or redevelopment purposes and the
City may lease space to sign companies, which will ensure
potential revenues for the City.
An informational discussion between staff and the Commis-
sioners concerning the proposed sign ordinance followed.
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing. There being no
one wishing to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the
proposed sign ordinance, Chairperson Dove closed the Public
Hearing.
Commissioner Haynes stated his desire that 5.(a) read "700
square feet" not "700 feet." This was agreed upon by all.
MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner I
Haynes, to adopt Resolution No. 2287, "A RESOLUTION OF THE I
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD RECOMMENDING CITY I
COUNCIL ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 25-33.25 B.5 OF
THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO FREESTANDING SIGNS,"
with 5.(a) changed "700 square feet" certifying that the
project is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines, as amended by Section 15061b(3) and recommending
that the City Council approve the £indings in Resolution No. �
2287, waive the reading and introduce the proposed ordi- i
nance.
MoTION carried by the following vote: �
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, McMiller,
Muhsin, Haynes, Pryor and Willis
NOES: None �
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None ;
4. Conditional Use Permit - Case No 17 (C U P 17� I
11041-11049 Louise Avenue (JOSeph Bolf) j
Applicant requests approval to construct two additional, I
two-bedroom dwelling units in the R-3 zone. �
After Mr. Barfield provided information from the case re- I
port, Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing. �
Roy Fulwider, 28219 Hazel Drive, Rancho Palos Verdes, 90274,
rose to discuss the proposal, more particularly Condition �
No. 41, for a marbelite street pole with underground serv- (
ices and conduits. He stated that street poles painted �
white are very close to applicant's property, and marbelite I
would not match.
i
Mr. semaan stated this condition has been a routine condi- I
tion for past two years and is generally not negotiable. I
Mr. Fulwider then stated that it will be difficult to go
underground. Mr. Semaan replied that all utilities are now �
required to go underground and Edison has the capabilities.
�
DISK M5:PC080889 i
�
I
3 '
i
I
,
I �
i "
i
' Mr. Fulwider then discussed Conditions No. 37 and 41. Mr.
Semaan stated the City is now commencing vacation of the
alleys, but the alley must be repaired for immediate action,
the alley will be vacated later. This discussion�continued
for some time, between Commissioners and staff inembers, with
a general consensus that staff will work with the applicant
to resolve the problems of the marbelite pole and under-
grounding of Edison lines. On-site investigation by both
the applicant and staff will be required.
Mr. Barnes suggested the following conditions: reconstruct
damaqe pavement on the rear alley, south property line to
north property line. In the event that a P.C.C. cross
gutter exist on either side of the site, the applicant shall
construct a three (3) foot wide P.C.C. cross gutter.
MOTION by Commissioner Haynes, SECONDED by Commissioner
Pryor, to adopt Resolution No. 2284, "A RESOLUTION.OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDI-
TIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 17 (C.U.. 17) FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
TWO (2) DWELLING UNITS AT 11041-49 LOUISE AVENUE, LYNWOOD,
CALIFORNIA, IN THE R-3 (MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE,"
, approving Conditional Use Permit No. 17 subject to the
stated conditions and requirements, with the additional
condition to reconstruct damage on the rear alley, south
property line to north property line. In the event that a
P.C.C. cross gutter exists on either side of the site, the
applicant shall construct a three (3) foot wide P.C.C, cross �
gutter finding that Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 17 will I
not have a significant effect on the environment, and certi- ;
fying the Negative Declaration as adequate. i
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, McMiller, Muhsin, Haynes I
Pryor and Willis I
NOES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis �
ABSENT: None I
I
ABSTAIN: None �
5. Conditional Use Permit - Case No 18 (C U P 1813 f
11729 and 11731 Fourth Avenue (Jack Pryor) I
Applicant requests approval to relocate two two-story du- '
plexes in the R-2 zone.
j
• Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing and Jack Pryor, i
P.O. Box 43621, Los Angeles, California, 90042, rose to..
address the Commissioners. He stated this would be afford-�� I
able housing and he intends to work with H.U.D. on specific I
rents. �
i
Commissioner Pryor asked the age of the units and Mr. Jack �
Pryor replied that they are approximately 20-22 years old, �
having been built in 1965 or 1968. �
i
I
Mr. Mas stated the units will be inspected before they can �
be moved into Lynwood and that just minimum requirements I
won't be acceptable. Mr. Jack Pryor added that the units �
have already been inspected and a �
pproved by the Lynwood �
Building Division.
i
There being no one else wishing to speak either in favor of I
or in opposition to the proposal, Chairperson Dove closed j
the Public Hearing.
DISKM5:PC080889
�
�
4 I
�
�
_ �..___.._ i
.
.
There was more discussion about the age of the units, with
Mr. Mas stating that approval by the Building Inspector was
. all that was necessary. He further stated that if the units
do not meet present code, the inspector would not approve
their relocation to Lynwood.
MOTION by Commissioner Cole-Dennis, SECONDED by Commissioner
McMiller, to adopt Resolution No. 2285, "A RESOLUTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONNDI-
TIONAL USE PERMIT (C.U.P.) NO. 18 TO RELOCATE TWO MOVE-ONS
, COMPRISING OF TOWNHOUSE STYLE DUPLEXES IN THE R-2 (TWO-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE AT 11729 AND 11731 FOURTH STREET,
• LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262, " subject to the stated condtions
- and requirements, and certifying that the project is cate-
". gorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3).
' MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, McMiller,
Muhsin, Haynes, Pryor and willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Mr. Mas informed Mr. Jack Pryor that until Condition No. 18
is fulfilled, the City will not issue any permits, so this
should be taken care of as soon as possible.
7. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 20
11138 Louise Avenue (Juan Becerra)
Applicant requests approval to develop one two-story duplex
, in addition to an existing one-story single family house in
" the R-3 zone.
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing and Ray Lopez,
1225 W. Victoria Avenue, Montebello, rose to state his
acceptance of all conditions.
_ There being no one else wishing to speak in favor of, or in
opposition to, the proposal, Chairperson Dove closed the
' Public Aearing.
' Commissioner Haynes stated that many improvementa on the
existing one-story single family house will be necessary.
Mr. Lopez agreed and stated they will be done. Mr. B-
Pessima stated that all structures presently on the site,
including a trailer and excluding the one-story single
family house, will be torn down and removed from the site.
. MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner
Cole-Dennis, to adopt Resolution no. 2288, "A RESOLUTION OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (C.U.P..) NO. 20 TO CONSTRUCT ONE
TWO-STORY DUPLEX IN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY
• HOUSE IN THE R-3 (MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE AT 11138
' LOUISE AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, 90262,° subject to the
. stated conditions and requirements, and certifying that the
project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the
State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section 15061 b(3).
DISK M5:PC080889
5
�`°. _ , .
., .
, MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, McMiller, Muhsin,
' Haynes, Pryor and Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
8. Conditional Use Permit - Case No 12 (C U P 12�
11670 Virginia Avenue (Sergio Lopez)
Applicant requests approval to develop two townhouses in the
" R-2 zone.
Because the applicant was not present, a continuance to the
next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission
on September 12, 1989, was discussed. Mr. Mas stated that
if no action is taken, the C.U.P. will be approved after 45
days. without any conditions, so a decision should be made
at this meeting, thereby maintaining the conditions as
desired by the City.
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing. There being no
one wishing to speak in favor of, or in opposition to, the
proposal, Chairperson Dove closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Haynes asked counsel if the Commission approves I
the proposal, would the conditions as now required would be
binding. Mr. Barnes replied that the applicant could appeal
to the City Council, but if he doesn't, yes, they are bind-
ing. �
I
There was a short discussion as to the number of bedrooms I
and bathrooms Commissioner Willis asked if there was a way j
to demand that the property, which now looks terrible, be I
cleaned. �
Mr. Mas explained that could be made a condition and then i
reminded the Commissioners that on September 5, the City
Council will conduct Abatement Hearings, which could be I
quite informative for those Commissioners unfamiliar with �
abatement procedures.
It was agreed to add Condition No. 18, which will require '
that the property be cleaned before work commences. �
At this time, the Commissioners discussed 11140 Duncan, I
where cleanup was required, and where nothing has been done. �
Mr. Mas stated he would give the address to the Code:
Enforcement offices, then the Planning Department could
initiate revocation proceedings and this would revoke the �
permits already granted. i
MOTION by Commissioner Haynes, SECONDED by Commissioner �
McMiller, to approve Resolution No. 2276, "A RESOLUTION OF �
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING �
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (C.U.P.) NO. 12 TO CONSTRUCT TWO
THREE BEDROOM TOWNHOUSES IN THE R-2 (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) (
ZONE, AT 11671 VIRGINIA AVENUE, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262," i
subject to the stated conditions and requirements,.adding �
Condition No. 18 that the property must be cleaned before
work commences, and finding that the project is categorical- I
ly exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines
as amended by Section 15061 b(3). i
DISKM5:PC080889 '
�
i
6 I
I
: �
i
� .
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: None
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
, REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS
There was none.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Mr. Mas stated there will'be a special meeting of the Planning
- Commission on Monday, August 21, at 7:00 p.m.
Mr. Fenderson stated the City Council has directed staff to redo
the pole siqn ordinance so as to allow some pole signs.
Mr. Fenderson stated that some elements of the General Plan have
: been sent back to the consultant for finalization. Mr. Mas
discussed the various elements and the possible changes of some. i
Mr. B-Pessima discussed his continued efforts to get Building
Permit information to the citizens as requested by Commissioner i
Cole-Dennis. He is considering using computers in his office to
print this material at minimal cost to the City. Commissioner
Cole-Dennis thanked him for his update. �
Chairperson Dove and Mr. Mas discussed, as was discussed last �
month, the possibility of improving commercial areas as is being
- done in Huntington Park and South Gate. Mr. Mas stated that
joint power agreements with neighboring cities for shared rail-
road and vehicular traffic are in the planning stage. i
PUBLIC ORALS I
There were none
i
' COMMISSION ORALS
Commissioner Willis stated his total appreciation that the prob- �
lem at 4200 Bullis Road was resolved. �
Commissioner Haynes repeated his earlier request that something
be done to show the City's appreciation of Commissioner Kanka,
perhaps a plaque.
Commissioner Haynes further asked for an update on the process of
C.U.P.'s granted during 1988-89, and the present of same. He'
commented that Caltrans covered a well with the Century Freeway,
they then built a second well that has now been found to be �
contaminated. �
Mr. Fenderson discussed the possibility of a workshp regarding I
the General Plan for the Commissioners. ;
i
Commissioner pove discussed three burned-out units..and a garage i
with hanging timber and debris north of Church and the alley i
behind Brenton Way.
Commissioner Muhsin stated his appreciation of his membership in j
the Commission. ,
�
DISKM5:PC080889 i
I
' I
I
I
;..
s
;
'' Commissioner Pryor discussed ice cream and food carts. A man
with an ice cream cart went on his private property and was
5: stopped by his neighbor. Mr. Mas replied that such carts are
` regulated and required to carry liability coverage. Unfortunate-
;� ly, the City doesn't have enough manpower for proper enforcement.
i: He recalled a time that 40 such cart pushers were caught without
i licenses.
�.
�
, ,
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION was made by Commissioner Cole-Dennis to adjourn to the
special meeting of the Planning Commission on August 21, 1989 at
7:00 p.m., SECONDED by Commissioner Haynes, and carried unani-
mously. The meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m.
�.
M1
DISKM5:PC080889
8
�
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING
' � PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA
_ MONDAY, AUGUST 28, 1989
" OPENING CEREMONIES
A_ Call to order
° A special meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of
Lynwood was called to order by Chairperson Dove on the
above-captioned date at 7:30 p.m., in Bateman Hall, 11331
Ernestine, Lynwood, California, 90262.
B. Pledge of Allegiance
� Commissioner McMiller led the Pledge of Allegiance.
C. Ro11 Ca11 of Commissioners
Chairperson Dove requested the roll call, and Mr. Fenderson
complied.
Present: Commissioner ponald Dove
- Commissioner John K. Haynes
: Commissioner Carlton McMiller
Commissioner Jamal Muhsin
Commissioner Roy Pryor � ,
- Commissioner David J. Willis, Jr.
� Also present: Vicente L. Mas, Community Development Director
Joy Valentine, Minutes Clerk
Kenrick Karefa-Johnson was seated alone in the audience, and
another man joined him,later.
Mr. Fenderson stated Commissioner Cole-Dennis told him she
would attend, and he expected that she wou7d.
D. Certification of Agenda Posting
Mr. Fenderson stated that per the Brown Act, the agenda had
been duly posted.
NEW PUBLIC HEARING: '
2oning Ordinance Amendment Case No. 4 (ZOA #4) On-Premises Free-
way-Oriented S ians Citywide
City staff proposes to Amend Chapter 2S, the official Zoning
Ordinance with respect to on-premises freestanding signs,
Citywide.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis walked in.
Mr. Fenderson read pertinent information from the Agenda Memo,
' stating that total elimination of on-premises freestanding signs
' has proven to be detrimental to some businesses so staff proposes
to amend.the present sign ordinance to allow pole sign construc-
tion under certain limits, basing approval on location, lot size
and distances from existing signs and freeways.
Commissioner Haynes asked why no City Attorney was present. Mr.
Mas stated the attorney had been informed of the meeting but he
was unable to attend. Mr. Mas stated the material presented by
staff was checked and approved by`the City attorney, so every-
thing was legally covered.
" DISKM5:PC082889
. 1
i
Commissioner Haynes stated his displeasure and unwillingness to
% appr.ove or amend material presented to the Commission without the
guidance of an attorney. He stated he would go ahead with the
. meeting and perform as required, but he absolutely was of the
; opinion that an attorney should be present.
�
I Mr. Fenderson said the City Attorney reviewed the agenda before
' it was presented to the Commission.
, Commissioner Haynes repeated that he did not appreciate the
absence'of the attorney.
Mr. Mas stated there was no legal violation or any violation of
rules.
Chairperson Dove asked if there is any restriction as to the size
of letters. He finds that small letters can be a hazard, espe-
cially on the freeway.
Mr. Mas replied that only the size of the sign is limited, but a
, . scale drawing must be submitted to staff before approval is
granted'. , �
At this time, it must be noted that three typos were found in the
proposed ordinance. 1), in the heading "ABCDE" should be changed
to "ABCD" since there is no item E, 2), in the "On-Premises
Freestanding Sign." paragraph, it should read "may only be erect-
ed,�� and_3), under item (A), it should read "up to a maximum of
two hundred (200) square feet."
There was a long discussion as to which side of a corner lot,
would be considered the proper side to measure and it was agreed
that both sides of a corner lot cannot be considered. -
; Commiasioner Haynes stated he would like "any sign must deal with
the mailing address, " added to the ordinance. Mr. Mas stated
that if Commissioner Haynes wanted that added, it could be added,
_ as it is now, on a corner property, the City must take into
consideration the frontage that will accommodate the proposed
sign.
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing.
Mr. Layton Hall, 3653 E. Imperial Highway, Lynwood, rose to state
. his support for the proposed ordinance. He stated that if Lyn-
wood wishes to attract major retail companies, like K-Mart, which
spend millions to locate their outlets; they must be permitted to
have easily visible signs. A lack of good signage can cause the
loss of 1�� of possible retail sales, which affects the potential
tax base and man hours worked, he stated.
There being no one else wishing to speak either in favor of or in
opposition to the proposal, Chairperson Dove closed the Public
Hearing.
MOTION by Commissioner Haynes, SECONDED'by Commissioner Cole-
Dennis to adopt Resolution No. 2292, "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLAN-
NING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL
ADOPTION -0F AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 25.33. BY ADDING (6) ABGD TO
, THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ON-PREMISES FREESTANDING
SIGNS,'� certifying that the project is exempt from the provisions
of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended by Section 15061 b(3),
recommending that the City Council approve the findings in Reso-
' lution No. 2292 and waive the reading and introduce the proposed'
ordinance.
� DISKM5:PC082889
2
MOTSON carried by the followinq vote:
AYES: Dove, Haynes, McMiller, Muhsin, Pryor, Willis,
Cole-Dennis '
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
� ABSTAIN: None �
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS
None •
STAFF COMMENTS
None
PUBLIC ORALS
None
COMMISSION ORALS
Commissioner_ Willis asked Mr. Mas if he might be able to influ-
' ence the Public Works Department to do something about the
street sweeping on .Lugo between Bullis and Ernestine and the
� 12200 block of Waldorf. The streets are posted for sweeping
between 4:00 - 6:00 a.m. and are swept after 7:00 a.m. The
sweeper is leaving debris, not sweeping at proper time, knocking
off tree limbs and leaving them for residents to pick up. Com-
' missioner Willis stated he has spoken to the supervisor without
° any results. Mr. Mas said he would speak to the Director of the
Public Works Department.
Commissioner Haynes repeated his demand that the City Attorney be
present at special meetings and said he will make a formal com-
plaint should this happen again. He stated, "I insist, I demand
that the.City Attorney be present at all special meetings." He
, also requested more publicity be given to special meetings so the
public will know about them and attend.
Chairperson Dove acknowledged Commissioner Haynes' demand for the
presence of the City Attorney at special meetings.
Mr. Mas stated he will speak to all those involved with Commis-
sioner Haynes' concerns. '
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION was made to adjourn to the next regularly scheduled meet-
ing of'the Planning Commission on September 12, 1989 by Commia-
sioner Haynes, SECONDED by Commissioner McMiller, carried unani-
' mously,-and the meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
DISKM5:PC082889
a 3
i ''
' a r�
` �!�';'"r,��lP• "t" , 11 �
,,. .-.,�, a, ?7 ��r1 �v0.
DATE: October 10, 1989
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION ��`��- ���. �
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUB,7ECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 15467 - CASE NO. TPM9
Applicant(s): Rev. Dr. Charles Floyd
PROPOSAL•
The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map No.
15467 for the purpose of consolidating two parcels, at 11400
California Avenue in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone.
FACTS
1. Source of Authoritv.
Section 25-18, et seq., Subdivision Regulations of the
Lynwood Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act,
Government Code Section 66410, et seq require that a parcel
map be recorded for the consolidation of several lots into a
single parcel, or more.
2. Prooerty Location.
The subject parcels are located on the southeastern
corner of California Avenue at the intersection of Mulford
Avenue. (Refer to attached Location Map.)
3. Existing Land Use
At present the subject parcels have a church and move-on
apartment buildings which are to be used in the development
proposal with the following uses:
North - Multi-Family East - Multi-Family •
South - Multi-Family West - Multi-Family
4. Land Use Desianation.
The General Plan designation for the property is Residential
and the zoning classification is R-3.
The surrounding land use designations are as follows:
General Plan Zonina
North - Residential R-3
South - Residential R-3
East - Residential R-3
West - Residential R-3
6. Site Plan Review.
At its regular meeting on August 31, 1989, the Site Plan
Review Committee recommended approval to the Planning
Commission subject to the conditions in the attached
resolution.
l
DISK 54: TPM9
; �
�
,
., � . �; '..�
� ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
Environmental Assessment.
The Community Development Department has determined that the
project could not have a significant effect on the environment.
Therefore, a Notice of Exemption has been prepared and is on file
in the Community Development Department and the office of the
City Clerk.
Staff analysis of this proposed lot consolidation include the
following findings: (a) Design of the proposed site; and (b)
Consistency of the proposed site with the General Plan.
Desian Of The Proposed Site Consolidation
a. The design of the proposed lot consolidation shows the
consolidated lots to be in character with existing
residential developments in the area.
b. The proposal is meant for the consolidation of five lots
into two in order to allow better utilization of the
property.
c. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed
� density of the development permitted by the General Plan and
zoning ordinance in that the parcels are substantially flat
and able to support the type of development proposed.
Consistencv Of The Site With The General Plan
a. Staff's inspection shows the site to be compatible with the
City of Lynwood's General Plan as the General Plan limits
land use activities to those projects that enhance the
function and quality of residential developments without
altering significantly the character of the existing
environment.
b. The size and location of the proposed project does not
significantly change the character of the existing
environment.
c. The proposed consolidation is consistent with the Zoning
'' classification of R-3 the General Plan designation of
Multi-family residential.
RECOMMENDATION(S1:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 228g.
1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the
provisions of the state CEQA Guidelines as amended by
section 15061 b(3).
2. Approving Tentative Parcel Case No. 9, subject to the stated
conditions and requirements.
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Resolution No. 2289
3. Tentative Parcel Map No. 15467
DISK 54:TPM9
.
�.
LOCATION iVIAP
_ ��.�so �_,� �:— —
�
, • m i .� � ' . � ^! .^� � 1 � � C/TY ` � y � �d9— „� Z7
.. � ne ` S SqNBOR � �� . � � ro J m �� , y m �� � z7/ ' e 771n ZJ:.
0 �.
. p� h � ` sa yo .o � n I 6 N`�I
6 j ��� er � ' 192 � I l� � '�S� � � � � '
ai � 1/ ^o /idoSn o � SO �o N
,�t� �, � z�o . �vl o �f � v o 'w
3u >�' ; �B'�-. �� "�' ^il �y [v ti� ^�i •r �o
�, �•r �. iia � 1 IB6 �' '� y� I �° b ro s
ji9 a,. 7W IIabS�. � S/ � Z8`S M h b I M y �
� ��- ' . � z � M
�� 3i ���:i. v.p3� � $� � � 1� � �^� .
�u gl6 � �. i 1133 /i b� � I I 18 Z
�) jiS�iU 94/ � . �3?�o I .
. � )J� 314 ._ '0 70l \ .341 J!,! ^ M /� Jzy ' '
,J 3jn '� . I }15 � y �� �Y� ` J11
� ]��s j�Z, �s .iian076' � (n o .sri'� � 113d9� � .345 946 M I I �
y �p �• MUCFORO � 8 0 (b . b �i� � b 3 � � b n ' .
� i v
"� � I l.
o ° N � . g �,° J ��Wi �° ro b � • �' I h^i � �7
A . r,. M1 �III � .
VEN�E � '^ ,otyA �"' "i �n� � < ..a M
� e .n•• � .i6 j � � .y �� 4 � . �w M1 .
� � ` ot �� ' � 6 � m � 311 ' � —L - .
I � � �ro b Ia
, yy . ili 36/ � b ��� b '
.IW�o .,�.-'o ���� I � � � � I
II4d3 .1,$,9 ^� M' ty
�r'„'975 �.a�.`a Z � � � � 3�B 3JI
u 6S� �� . � � Q' ��.�-�+^' ' �
, � ` - �. �iu a�� o ., �, � acc " : : ' -- - i — s I � I I
• 0�� ti o � ^ , 3 j1 - '� '�'qi � I � I6B� I �
' '. �° . 390 ir+ . 1Y1 n i. �,: C� o � b Q 06,¢ �
,� 5 �`t' + ' . 33�u t� � �'" m ^) �`' � ` ��� !I/ � . �
, ' .�� �63 . �y�3� � i � � � M ��� � M i� ��Z
' - � 6 - �� - - � ", o � _ PL.4TT �� I � ,. b ro b y � b v� 4�4
— � s o M 4 7 ro � � � r•
� �� � W' �f��t� io� � M so ;� M ry� � n
7Y /O � � ' so M 4.
DO • A e � � 1 �° � ' p •� a .. . � .
l, i�,� l� ro n' °" ✓ Nj r
y v i77 '. O � ,�� � ....
pE • ` � l y ��, " , --
p M 'h� �� ��°5 �' o � �
.. (➢i .i �� I I¢y M.I�' 6� I� n.� ♦° � V �
�p ... Q �I14V Ia8 p �p �AO O � .�a 11 �
� , � aa � " . � � i a � � ;.� ;.yi�si �F ,`' �Q`� ; ^,'/
ti
�� a� 1 � �� / µ` \ � `���v5.� b ti °
�
�. � qkro � � JW '(�� � \ LY,f�
J ? � s � �° s .. f �n� ,�°` a[ n ' / �i,v,r � a �
� /y !!f1��� y
`� �' ' 6 / •,, `J . �, �" j ! . !�°� � la.r /� �P '� �
�� �a „�� • "Y 7 � �4G � 7
� N / �{
� i o � �� ' 'fOD �IY q� � �
' j� ��,� o �,� �, � �� \ '
� � .
� ° !ei �A iiy '1 � ° �� R \ '�' 4 /��.� \\P � .
� � '�eY e0e //37 � o
, eo.0 �", s�e�� 8 ���,�'� " ��yL �iy�b'Bo
. � ' � a. � ° ��^i��4i� �Q � � ��y
/
' - » o. p� A/iYB,j
� a \ ~
� M O
I
� �
I
I
�
-:
; . �,�,
r RESOLUTION NO. 2289
{
�
�
!
�
� A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
; CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.
j 15467 TO COMBINE PARCELS 9, 10, 11, 12, AND 13 INTO
F TWO LOTS 362 AND 363 OF TRACT N0. 2551 MB 24-78-80
l PER MAP RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER
j OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY.
� WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
� ursuant to law conducted a
p , public hearing on the subject
application; and
� WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined
that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines, as amended; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered all
pertinent testimony offered in the case as presented at the public
j hearing; and
I
� WHEREAS the
I , preparation, filing and recordation of Parcel Map
'• is required for development; and
i
i
� Section 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find and
' determine that said Tentative Parcel Map No. 15467 should be
s approved for the following reasons:
€
i A. The combination of lots meet all the applicable
� requirements and conditions imposed by the State
j Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of
; the Lynwood Municipal Code.
j B. The proposed combination of lots is consistent with the
� applicable elements of the General Plan and the
j Official Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lynwood.
f
? C. Proper and reasonable provisions have been made for
; adequate ingress and egress to the lots being combined.
�
,
i D. Proper and adequate provisions have been made for all
� public utilities and public services, including sewers.
,
�
� Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 15467 in the R-3
(Multi-Family Residential) zone, subject to the following condi-
j tions
I
� Communitv Development Department Conditions
� 1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments.
2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement
of Acceptance stating that he has read, understands, and
agrees to the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission,
before any building-permits are issued.
I DISK 54:RE502289
I
�
; �
�
:;
� ' t ;
� • ,
� . Planninq Division Conditions
I 3. Within twenty-four (24) months after approval or conditional approval
� of Tentative Parcel Map, the subdivider shall file with the City of
; Lynwood, a Final Map in substantial conform�ice with the Tentative
� Parcel Map as approved or conditionally approved, and in conformance
with the Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the
City of Lynwood.
4. Extension of the Tentative Map approval shall only be considered if the
applicant or his/her representative, submits a written request for
extension to the Community Development Department stating the reasons
for the request, at least thirty (30) days before map approval is due
. to expire, pursuant to, and in compliance with, Section 25-18, of the
subdivision regulations of the City of Lynwood.
5. The Final Parcel Map shall be filed with the City ESigineer of the City
of Lynwood.
DEPARTMIIVT OF PCJBLIC WORKS/ETIGINEERING
6. All conditions of the State Map Act and the City's subclivision ordinance
must be met prior to recordation;,
All matters and improvements shall be consistent with the ordinances,
standards, and procedures of the City's Development Standards, Engi-
neering Procedures and Standards, Water Standards, and Planting
Standards of the Department of Parks and Recreation.
The Developer is responsible for checking with staff for clarification
' of these requirements.
7. Submit a Subdivision Gliarantee to this office.
The final map shall be based on a field survey. Al1 surveying for the
proposed development will be done by the Developer, including the
establishment of centerline ties. ESiclose with the final map the sur-
veyor's closure sheets.
8. Developer shall pay all applicable development fees including drainaqe,
sewer, water and parkway trees prior to issuance of any building
permits.
Pay Parcel Map checking fees prior to checking.
Pay $100 monument checking fee prior to recordation. Deposit $50 with
City Et7gineer to guarantee receipt by City of recorded, reproducible
mylar, parcel map prior to recordation.
� All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees are to
be paid prior to recording the final map. All requirements to the
serving utilities to be met or guarantee prior to recording of the final
map.
DISK54:RES02�289
;;
i; _�
, . �
�
; .
� � -
y' ,
: •
;t;' 9. Gradina and Drainina
��,x
'�' A grading plan signed by a registered Civil Engineer shall
be submitted for the approval of the Director of Public
Works/City Engineer and the Director of Community
Development. The grading plan shall include the topography
of all contigous properties and streets and shall provide
for the methods of drainage in accordance with all
applicable City standards. Retaininq walls and other
protective measures may be required. Offsite drainage
easements may be necessary. The structural section of all
parking areas shall be designed by a Civil Engineer based
upon soils analysis supplied by a recognized and approved
soils engineering firm. The structural section shall be
' approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. In
the event that the design is not provided, the minimum
structural section that will be approved by the Director of
Public Works/City Engineer would be 2 inches of asphalt on
4 inches of untreated rock base.
Submit to this office a Geologic/Soils Report signed by a
Registered Soils Engineer.
�p Sewers
The development shall be provided with public sewers.
Connect to public sewer. Provide laterals as necessary.
Design of all sanitary sewers shall be approved by the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
11. Water Svstems
The Developer shall construct a water system including
water services, fire hydrants and appurtenances throuqh the
development as required by the Director of Public
Works/City Engineer. The Developer shall submit a water
system plan to the City of Lynwood Fire Department for fire
hydrant locations. The City will install water meters
only. Payment for,said meters shall be made to the City
prior to issuance of building permits. The Developer shall
install on-site water facilities includings stubs for water
meters and fire hydrants on interior and on boundary
arterial streets.
All conditions of the Lynwood Fire Department must be met
prior to recordation.
12, Public Easements and Riaht-of-Way
Where drainage, sewer and other such easements 'are
required, the minimum easement width shall be ten (l0) feet'
to facilitate maintenance unless otherwise approved by the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
13. Sidewalks
Design, configuration and locations shall be subject to the
approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, and
the Director of Community Development. Ramps for
physically handicapped persons shall be provided both on-
� site and off-site as required by State and local
regulations.
disk54:reso2289
�
;
, �
�, 14.. Dust Control and Pedestrian Safety
�' Prior to the issuance of demolition or grading permits,
;':, the developer shall:
�
:.,�
�' a. Submit a plan indicating safety methods to be provided
to maintain safe pedestrian ways around all area of
' construction. This may require proper and adequate
signs, fences, barricades, or other approved control
devices as required by the Director of Community Deve-
lopment.
15. The Developer shall install all public improvements, as
required by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer
prior to issuance of any occupancy permits for this deve-
lopment. Public Improvements shall include but are not
limited to:
a. Reconstruction of damaged PCC sidewalk along California
Avenue and Mulford Avenue.
b. Reconstruction of damaged PCC curb and gutter along
California Avenue and Mulford Avenue.
c. Reconstruction of damaged pavement along California Avenue
and Mulford Avenue.
d. Construction of (2) wheelchair ramps at northeast and
southeast corners of California Avenue and Mulford Avenue.
e. Installing two (2) marbelite street lights with under-
ground services and conduits on California Avenue and
Mulford Avenue.
f. Underground all utilities.
16. Construct.a five (5) fe�t wide planter to separate the parking
lot from the sidewalk area.
Parcel Map must include a reciprocal easement b�twezn the
pro�osed parcels 1 and 2; to provide access from lot 1 to the
parking lot on Lot 2.
17 • Property is located within the 100 yard flood zone per
Flood Insurance Boundary work map, of April 19, 1989, The
pro�erty owner must sign a hold harmless agreement with the City
of Lynwood.
All chanqes and repairs in existing curbs, gutters, and sidewalks and
other public improvements shall be paid for by the develo�er. If
improvements are to be guaranteed, a faithful performance bond shall
be posted by the developer to guarantee installation of said public
improvements and an agreement for completion of improvements with the
City Council shall be entered into. Submit Policy of Insurance or bond
protecting City against damage or injury to persons or property growing
out of, related to, or resulting from improvements or work, The Director
of Public Works/City Engineer will determine amount and form. Deposit
with the Director of Public Works/City Engineer before commencing any
improvements, a sum estimated by the Director of Public Works/City
Engineer to cover cost of inspection of all improvements under his
jurisdiction.
I
I
I Disk 54:reso2289
I
�
,
:,
:a • :.
:, .
;i
:, ..
� ,.
:, .
Y '
y ' e
���,' Section 3: A copy of Resolution No. 2289 the conditions
,r shall be delivered to the applicant.
� APPROVED and ADOPTED this lOth day of October 1989, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Donald A. Dove, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes
Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney
' DISK 54: RESO 2289
4
1
�
I
I
� �
I
.. j .:
DATE: October 10, 1989 qGE ���� �TENI �v0._�
CASE fVp, v
TO: PII�NNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 21626. CASE NO TPM 10
Applicant: Ahn & Han Architects, Inc.
PROPOSAL•
The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map (No.
21626) for the purpose of consolidating two parcels, at 12203
Long Beach Boulevard in the C-2A (Medium Commercial) zone.
FACTS:
1. Source of Authoritv
Section 25-18, et seq., subdivision regulations of the Lyn-
wood Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act, Government
Code Section 66410, et seq. require that a parcel map be
recorded for the consolidation of several lots into a single
parcel.
2. PROPERTY LOCATION
The subject parcels are located on the west side of Long
Beach Boulevard between Magnolia Avenue and Burton Avenue.
(Refer to attached Location Map.)
3. EXZSTING LAND USE
I
At present, the subject parcels have a single story grocery '
market building and a two car garage. The existing grocery I
market will relocate to the proposed shopping center. The I
property is surrounded by the following uses:
North - Medium Commercial . I
South - Medium Commercial I
East - Medium Commercial ,
�
West - Multi-Family Residential ,
4. LAND USE DESIGNATION I
The General Plan Designation for the property is commercial; I
The zoning classification is C-2A (Medium Commercial) zone. I
The surrounding land use designations are as follows: i
General Plan 2onina '
I
i
North - Commercial C-2A
South - Commercial C-2A �
East - Commercial �_ZA I
West - Multi-Family R-3 I
;
DISK 53:TPM10 i
�
r
�
�
�
�
5. Site Plan Review
At its regular meeting on September 28, 1989, the Site Plan Review
Committee recommended approval to the Planning Commission subject
to the conditions in the attached resolution.
6. Code Enforcement Historv
None
7. Public Response
None
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
Environmental Assessment
The Community Development Department has determined that the project
could not have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a
Notice of Exemption has been prepared and is on file in the Community
Development Department and the office of the City Clerk.
Staff analysis of this proposed lot consolidation include the follow-
ing findings: (a) Design of the proposed site; and (b) Consistency of
the proposed site with the General Plan.
Desiqn of the Dr000sed site consolidation
a. The design of the proposed lot consolidation shows the consolidat- �
ed lots to be in character with existing Commercial developments
in the area.
b. The proposal is meant for the consolidation of two lots in order
to allow better utilization of the property. i
c. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density I
of the development permitted by the General Plan and zoning
ordinance in that the parcels are substantially flat and able to I
support the type of development proposed. i
I
Consistencv of the site with the General Plan I
a. Staff's inspection shows the site to be compatible with the City '
of Lynwood's General Plan as the General Plan limits land use
activities to those projects that enhance the function and quality �
of residential developments without altering significantly the �
character of the existing environment.
b. The size and location of the proposed project does not signifi- �
cantly change the character of the existing environment.
c. The proposed consolidation is consistent with the Zoning classifi- I
cation of C-2A and the General Plan designation of Commercial. �
RDO(x4gSIDATIONS: .. i
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the Planning ornmiission '
adopt attached Resolution No. 2297, j
I
1. The project is F]cempt from the provisions of the State CDQA (�idelines, I
as amended by Section 15061 b(3).
2. Approving T�tative Paroel Map Case No. 7, subject to the stated conditions I
and requir�nents. I
I
Attachments: �
1. Location Map P
2. Resolution No. 2297 i
3. Tentative Parcel Map No. 21626
I
I
�
I
�
. " I
LOCATION MAP
� 17wPK� . .. �� '', `� \ .
� v�pO � � �' . "��`i� `� � .
�S/ . ^f �°� �'4 ��°��� � ��
�� � � �� �
�� g�l . . , � ' Ho., �� � � .
6 �^� � °
o � .! ��P �,t ���
� � � �� _{�� $� do . Q � AYENNE ��Pt.. � �'A� �j '\ �r2
� y' h iT 9 � � �� . ��'° � $ ' M v "� i� .
. � �(° ,� . � �� ,M � v�
p7
}�4r � / ,�� �/07 t v ° � \ �9
�f q \ • � / c l �i� m
.qy i �
.A �n'�� �.��.'�� � �E ,�'�'� � i . x� l�l� zv � '���, ,� j a
� "�� L '
� � ! \
. �3 �/ �a '°°„ i�,"S � '' .
� � �
�i � . � a �1� ,,,, ,m � .,� Q �
t �' ��r � . •`� ,�ro/ ,,, �o , � i ,;, �
y � i
� � . . ` 4 e, J ^ . . � I
� aa� . .fs ey ° � T j� 3 � � 1 �b a., r��� �^� av
� � � �' n�'� ° - � Y.wr�� F s; �h �b '�� F �� I
RI ♦�{ �� Q 3o SK Y{/ . a M `� d �
/ f` T �i _ n� / � l, ro 4 .�.: �7 . � '/(.`� i � � K' 1
� / � "4t � ^� � �.; � A M �. � .
� �yy� / / ; '@� a: �,�,,.<:...:.,5.: A62 "Q �. J'� � `• . I
a � O �' �,
� - � ^ <.:: �oie���' � 63 e � n� �§ �; a �, `
.� a � ,o � � ss+ e� � �'' i
' Q �, �� .� Klt). ..'. N A60 / BS �' ', V � I
� Q . � � � pn70 / BQQ �] fh'� � .I
n 1 'y �� o� � �vte��3. ees
'b� n r2 ��' U. F ' .� � ioxo R � °J � I
n y � � / \ � � I
i 'O �?�� �' ^', � ��6z q � �'
'° .s� °� / o � i°�' � d � �r,� � ,�'� ,� s / �
� / ���^� ^i� � `� '$AVENU£ L ° �
, � 71�N . �' h � � B / i
/ I ��r, M ,��3 g : � „ a sn a `°� , • � , ,� � �
w�t' o � 30 �� �� � �
b � � �v n� ^ a� o . -/ �'
�� �e �° ^ � / g �� . , i°si 70 �, y ,� j � ,
.^''/ ' D `Ts / `;" ' "" ieso � �1 '� �' �� b`� " `?� . - . i
v � O s y
� I'� ti ��°� � � : ios i � � / r j ' `� y v�' �
1� � ' p � S �y ` � � r, .I
. - , ' . ro � . t W � � R+�
'J •�' n �' b /�` . pu � s � � /
n1� ' �,/ o '°� i
� � � • �� ,Jv,"',} �eu ° m �f7 � °si t / _ l � I
�i L v - � � :�'i't,.� �
l �T '��/ 1 � - io 't - � � � �; ro � b �� ^�i y�9 I
� °'�'• q/ 3 AVEARK Y : CARUN- ---- '6 �� � Z i
. c
i
�
�
I
� 1
��� �
/ N ;
JL
i
I
,
i
. I
.K,« - ,•. �,,. I
�
— � �
I
TPM 10
RESOLUTZON NO. 2297
A RESOLUTZON OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NO. 21626 TO COMBINE LOTS 1024
AND 1025 OF TRACT NO. 3025 MB 35-43 & 44
PER MAP RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject applica-
tion; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has deter-
mined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State
CEQA Guidelines, as amended; and
wHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered
all pertinent testimony offered in the case as presented at the
public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the preparation, filing and recordation of Parcel ,
Map is required development; and
Section 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that said Tentative Parcel Map No. 21626 should be ap-
proved for the following reasons:
A. The combination of lots meet all the applicable require-
ments and conditions imposed by the State Subdivision Map I
Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the Lynwood Munic- �
ipal Code.
B. The proposed combination of lots is consistent with the �
applicable elements of the General Plan and the Official I
Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lynwood.
C. Proper and reasonable provisions have been made for I
adequate ingress and egress to the lots being combined. �
D. Pro er and ade uate �
p q provisions have been made for all
public utilities and public services, including sewers.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood �
hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 21626 in the C-2A (Medium I
Commercial) zone, subject to the following conditions. �
I
i
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT WNDITIONS '
i
1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments. '
!
2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement �
of Acceptance stating that he has read, understands, and !
agrees to the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, !
before any building permits are issued. �
3. Within twent four (24) months after a �
Y pproval or conditional �
approval of Tentative Parcel Map, the subdivider shall file j
with the City of Lynwood, a Final Map in substantial conform- �
ance with the Tentative Parcel Map as approved or conditional-
� ly approved, and in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act !
� and the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Lynwaod. i
DISK 53:RES02297
i
i
�
1 (
i
I
4. No grading permit or building permit shall be issued prior to
recordation of final map or another appropriate instrument
approved by the City of Lynwood, � in substantial
conformance with the Tentative Parcel Map as approved or
conditionally approved, and in conformance with the Subdivi-
sion Map Act and the Subdivision Requlations of the City of
Lynwood.
5. Extension of the Tentative Parcel Map approval shall only be
considered if the applicant or his/her representative, submits
a written request for extension to the Community Development
Department stating the reasons for the request, at least
thirty (30) days before map approval is due to expire,
pursuant to, and in compliance with, Section 25-18, of the
subdivision requlations of the City of Lynwood.
6. The Final Parcel Map shall be filed with the City Engineer of
the City of Lynwood.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING CONDITIONS
7. All conditions of the State Map Act and the City's subdivision
Ordinance must be met prior to recordation.
All matters and improvements shall be consistent with the
ordinances, standards, and procedures of the City's
Development Standards, Engineering Procedures and Standards,
Water Standards, and Planting Standards of the Department of
Parks and Recreation.
The Developer is responsible for checking with staff for �
clarification of these requirements.
8. Submit a Subdivision Guarantee to this office. I
The final map shall be based on a field survey or record data �
if sufficient data is available. All surveyinq for the (
proposed development will be done by the Developer, including �
the establishment of centerline ties. Enclose with the final j
map the surveyor's closure sheets. i
9. Developer shall pay all applicable development fees including �
drainage, sewer, water and parkway trees prior to issuance of I
any building permits.
Pay Parcel Map checking fees prior to checking. �
Pay $100 monument checking fee prior to recordation. Deposit j
$50 with City Engineer to quarantee receipt by City of record-
ed, reproducible mylar, parcel map prior to recordation. �
All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees ,
are to be paid prior to recording the final map. All �
requirements to the serving utilities to be met or guarantee
prior to recording of the final map. !
�
I
f
I
i
• i
i
�
�
I
I
�
10. Grading and Draining
A grading plan signed by a registered Civil Engineer shall be
submitted for the approval of the Director of Public
Works/City Engineer and the Director of Community Development.
The grading plan shall include the topography of all contingu-
ous properties and streets and shall provide for the methods
of drainage in accordance with all applicable City standards.
Retaining walls and other protective measures may be required.
Offsite drainage easements may be necessary. The structural
section of all parking areas shall be designed by a Civil
Engineer based upon soils analysis supplied by a recognized
and approved soils engineering firm. The structural section
shall be approved by the Director of Public Works/Engineer in
the event that the design is not provided, the minimum struc-
tural section that will be approved by the Director of Public
Works/City Engineer would be 2 inches of asphalt on 4 inches
of untreated rock base.
Submit to this office a Geologic/Soils Report signed by a
Registered Soils Engineer.
11. Sewers
The development shall be provided with public sewers. Connect
to public sewer. Provide laterals as necessary. Des'ign of
all sanitary sewers shall be approved by the Director of
Public Works/City Engineer.
12. Water Systems
The Developer shall construct a water system including water
development as required by the Director of Public Works/City
Engineer and the Director of Community Development. The
Developer shall submit a water system plan to the City of
Lynwood Fire Department for fire hydrant locations. The City
will install water meters only. Payment for said meters shall
be made to the City prior to issuance.of building permits.
The Developer shall install on-site water facilities including
stubs for water meters and fire hydrant on interior and on
boundary arterial streets.
All conditions of the Lynwood Fire Department must be met
pri.or to recordation.
13. Public Easements and Right-of-Way
Where drainage, sewer and other such easements are required,
the minimum easement width shall be ten (10) feet to
facilitate maintenance unless otherwise approved by the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
Dedicate a ten (10) foot wide strip of property along Long �
Beach Boulevard. Dedicate a five (5) foot wide strip of I
property along Magnolia Avenue. Dedicate sufficient property
southwest corner of Long Beach Boulevard and Magnolia Avenue i
to accommodate a radius.
14. Sidewalks
Design, configuration and locations shall be subject to the
approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer, and i
the Director of Community Development. Ramps for physically
handicapped persons shall be provided both on-site and off- i
site as required by State and Local regulations. �
�
i
�
I
I
3 I
�
I
I
i
i , •
15. Dust Control and Pedestrian Safety
Prior to the issuance of demolition or grading permits, the
developer shall:
a. Submit a plan indicating safety methods to be provided to
maintain safe pedestrian ways around all areas of con-
struction. this may require gropez and adequate signs,
fences, barricades, or other approved control devices as
required by the Director of Co�nunity Development.
Section 3. A copy of this resoltuion shall be delivered to
the applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this lOth day of October 1989, by members
of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Donald Dove, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes
Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney
I
I
�
�
i
I
i
I
�
DISK53:RES02297 �
�
I
j
�
:�
;
� s
� . c:.� •
� _ ��
'�„ �� CUP 23
qr; r,� t h • ^��� n`/''►
DATE: October 10, 1989 ��'-`�� °; i �li�� IVV. �
� � l� p�, C' i � R r� � � 1� ��
, T0: . PLANNING COMMISSION V."1ti7;. i�i`.i. __ (./ ��
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT:" CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -CASE NO. 23 (CUP 231
Applicant: Carlos Roman Pineda
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit
to develop six (6), two story, townhouses with attached garages -
. at the corner of Birch and Fernwood Streets,
in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone.
FACTS•
1. Source of Authoritv
Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that
a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to build or
relocate dwelling units in the R-3 zone.
2. Propertv Location
!The subject property consists of one (1) irregular 1ot on the '
northwest corner of Birch and Fernwood Streets, (Refer to
attached Location Map).
3. Property Size
The property is an irregular lot approximately 17,164 square
' feet in size.
4. Existing Land Use
The property is presently vacant. The surrounding land uses
are as follows:
North - Single Family/Multi-Family
South - I-105 Century Freeway
East - Multi-Family
� West - Multi-Family
5. Land Use Description
' The General Plan designation for the subject property is
Mu1ti-Family Residential, and the zoning classification is R-
3. The surrounding land use designations are as follows:
General Plan Zonina
' North - Multi-Family North - R-3
South - Multi-Family South - R-3 '
East - Multi-Family/Single Family East - R-3/R-1 �
West - Multi-Family West - R-3 �
�
, DISK 54:CUP23 I
. y� �
6. Prolect Characteristics
The applicant is proposing to develop three (3) two story
townhouses and a two story townhouse tri-plex. Each dwelling
unit consist of three (3) bedrooms with a attached two-car
garage. Landscaping consists of approximately forty four
percent (44%) of the lot area. Barbecue decks are included
. in the open space and recreation areas.
7. Site Plan Review
On September 28, 1989 the Site Plan Review Committee evaluat-
, ed the proposed development and recommended approval to the
Planning Commission with specific conditions.
8. Zoning Enforcement Historv
None of record.
9. Public Response:
A letter from the Lynwood School District is attached.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION:
l. Consistencv with General Plan
The property is consistent with the existing zoning
classification (R-3) and the General Plan designation (Multi-
Family). Tfierefore, qranting Conditional Use Permit No. 23
will not adversely affect the Lynwood General Plan.
2. Site Suitabilitv
The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
proposed development relative to density, bulk of the
structures, parking, walls, fences, landscaping, driveways
and other development features required by the Zoning
Ordinance.
The property is adequately served with the required public
' utilities and offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian
accessiblity.
3. Compatibility
The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of low
medium and high density residential developments; therefore,
the project will be compatible with developments in the area.
4. ComAliance with Development Standards
The proposal meets all of the development standards required
by the Zoning Ordinance with respect to parking; front,
' side, and rear-yard setbacks; distance between structures;
lot coverage; open space and landscaping; building height;
unit size and density.
The base density within the R-3 zone (18 unit/acre) allows
the development of seven (7) units. As stated above the
final development will consist of six (6) dwelling units.
DISK 54:CUP 23
5. Conditions of Approval
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, would neither
have a negative effect nor would interfere with the values
of the surrounding properties or endanger the public health,
safety or welfare.
6. Benefits to Communitv
The proposed development will aid to aesthetically upgrade
the neighborhood and act as a catalyst in fostering other
quality developments. Furthermore, it will add favorably to
the City's housing stock and provide additional affordably-
priced housing in furtherance of the policies of the Housing
Element of the General Plan.
7. Environmental Assessment
Staff has determined that this project is categorically
exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as
amended by Section 15061 b(3). Therefore, a Notice of Exemp-
tion has been prepared and is on file in the Community Devel-
opment Department and the Office of the City Clerk.
RECOMMENDATION::
, Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2294:
1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the
provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended by
Section 15061 b(3).
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 23, subject to the
stated conditions and requirements.
Attachments
1. Location Map
2. Resolution No. 2294
3. Plot Plan
DISK 54•CUP23
. , �,�'+(' '
�,'� - LYNWOOD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
* '*
���
- LaVONEIA 0. STEELE, Ed.D., SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS 11331 PIATA
. LYNWOO�,CALIFORNIA80YBY
CLIFFOqD A. kOCH � (213) 8034105
A551STANT $UPERINTENDENT,
BUSMESSSERVICES �
September 28, �9g9
Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
City of Lynwood
>>330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, CA 90262
RE: Potential Impact of Proposed Development on Public School
System Case No. CUP 23 .
Dear A1r, Mas:
Please be advised that the Lynwood Unified School District has
received notice of the above application for the proposed residential
development, to be located at northwest corner of Fernwood and
Birch, Lynwood California.
The proposed development is located in the Wilson Elementary School
Attendance Area. This school is currently overcrowded an aithough
portable classrooms are being used to help alleviate the problem, the
long range solution to the overcrowded conditions requires the
construction of several new schools. This long range solution will
take three to five years.
In addition, any proposed new enrollees due to this residential project
will be attending Hosfer Junior High School and Lynwood High School,
both of which are also experiencing severe overcrowded conditions.
The impact of this development to our enrollment may be as follows:
Primary: 0.6 Yield Factor x 6 units = 3.6 new students
Secondary: 0.3 Yield Factor x 6 units = 1, new students
Considering that all of our schools are already overcrowded this new
development has a very NEGATIVE impact on the School District.
If you require any further information, please feel free to contact us.
Ver t uly yours
,
�
C IF�17�CH
Assistant Superintendent,
Business Services
CAK:bm
. xc: LaVoneia C. Steele, Ed. D.
`, . ,
;.
_ �
:; , ...
<,: -, � � r � ` : .
,. „ ,:
;... _ .
_ ;, r
i ;
;: _, , : :. .
' �, s.
' , . :> >': ,> i `
: ;. , . � '
�,
_ . ' • � '
. . ' � . ' .. - .. .��n '
' .. . � _ ' � . .. �.�
. . . . , ' n F ..
. . . . ... '�.�
.';,.� '. ':.;'., . . ';.,'. _ , �', L ' ' .
. - . . . . . �. -. ��'` . ,:..
�. 3 i
. .. " � , i. " . : "� �:
,-..... ':. '. . ...'.: � . � �.. . . . .,: ,.
.
LOCATI4N iVIAP
, �'S� ._. ____.: �Zp m .� _ _— — .
� \� �
� \� �y15 }��„�„'`� � /�VE ' \\ "'�%v7` � jT 3 � � M' .. � sl '
� � �� C� a o
I l'✓�� a \ / J � N "� 0, 9p �)i�
� D / M � '�
\ pla � � " 6 �n g g i1� ",, �c�: �' � ° .�i ,e: � �
\ `-^ v+ � I�� n ti o. ��`l '/� �3 cn. � ioo p rG o M .
d� �, .o JE �'4 � .., tti� „ � `=� �. �a so } � �.,a j 165 i
� � �n � �� ' � �� M" � r i��l'�� q� \ m � ° � yypLN�t ia j ��cro '�b �J
. � '1l S \ � r � 'm\ " � � � •� ��, � � _� Z\63 �, • p �
��\ � 6 ,90 � �n. � IS _ Jj O��`ly ,! 9 °` S �\ s o '�•��b � �± � �1 ' ����
` , �pe Q W s� if 2 0 �s �s�m M IZAS 'V>" ti v� �� g �
M �
. ko� r f�� �z ° 1,�'JIY� 9l%� �L J � c � `° IZ, � �\� a � 1�� /Z
� ' �S�`, ���� M �, �L ,��co J� ^ - � �� g
, �\ I�y3�s 'r�� + � �o � ?�
- � \� - �5 ��� JS�• � I e � '`t ' �' 1 �� t" `� Y � 4 �'
. M � o �� i o �7 i l�'� „_„o ��` R �9 5 � ",�� -J8 o i �'e
, � `�� �\ _� 0.�,.�5� �I��� 1j4V � '" �4i��� ��i�QZa� �� , � g ` ti.���o0 9?0 <�
� � � .g II � y`� 3l g
� � �� . ivl o.. �gp h �p�,� 9" \ �°� e� �a� � 0. , ..
1b Q ,y�N VJZ' 1 ' Z x�l�l�p/ �c•is' 4) a „ .\ Sin
� ' � 4� �u 9 \ ¢ � .n �Zi �a � ' ..
t II`�� ,- ii �� ia��� ��.. �IFO y � �� o � �
` M' `311 a t 3 ^ so \� � <- i . .
� '� II'1 � ,,... � �". m �oa \ ^ ,x5 . �_ ,.� .
� � I o $ � V ' <: 'C':i:.':�'::: IyB M '_ � k 'cZ � � : 9� � � .w ro � j c l. s' , .
� .` M1
r `� 1 ` Yos�
� p9 � � a ���� ID2 .:: so1T5/ ., ( e'� c ia. 6 N.. .
' 1 -M 5 � ��I }O� �l _`9. � ..:ii: �.'>,•i� O !'n IO J/ � 9 � �/ .
� y0 �� y 92 � � .. . + O
ko1 ` ;-. g � ➢4 0 � ��� �;':�!��.::i:i��..:�:.�::.;.��'.::,� N� �oi.ne FfRNw !C RA�� �.
- M� ro �' ^�M n � � i� �� 8 � ��� �. ,,..: g PAGFI ELECTR
' MI M c+� n M�e2. � : .
r'f ��e0
�0 �� �
s cz ' w a NW000 '�
F �.
IGHT � OF WAY Y ( ia� .9 �M �� a � '��\, s �
0 Q3 /0/. �� � y �'s y, � tn\� ,`.ip1e�M �`\ .
��� 'f
� p. � �o. s4,.. Q �b � � i� � �
2o�ad
� acs�� �� 5�� � \ ^ u \ M � •°� j7ZI� i3� \ '.�r \ ���;..�o�r .
y Z �" e,.� "A a� o /' ° ^ � i� ,, \ : 5� :` �� ,30�? �
\ � :� r _ o�' I 12 SII .v �v -. .. . �oe. l 5a�
. � �� � � ''„'�- �� �S I�/ .ba `�, � u � �. � .,�� •� so so
M1 � N \ ; � ` 5 3� `rn °r I�% 3� � \' � � R ° sn
iF . \� i. �/,�T � a . :.� � s
S \ So � �
y4 �5 a�' V�� ��' �S �h yof 5a so . ' � j � /��� iJ��
�Y�dh� / 5)�. � 5 /OZ\ �Gtl . � I7) _
� �o y7. �v. / 3 4 h .�7)7 �� �^ a l � S
�.ta�� : a _ ��>� I��ib / . o a c M
�
l�` � � N
�
JL
- 1 f
° � suee r-aa
,.. ��
;
��;" , .
�'` . CUP 23
�. "
i�1 RESOLUTION N0. 2294
�,� .
` A RESOLUTION OF TAE PLANNING COMMISSION
t+� OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDI-
'¢ TIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 23 (CUP 23) FOR
5 " THE'CONSTRUCTION OF SIX (6), TWO STORY
' TOWNHOUSES AND ONE (1) TWO STORY TOWN-
- HOUSE TRI-PLEX AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF FERNWOOD AND BIRCH STREETS, LYNWOOD,
'a, CALIFORNIA, IN THE R-3 (MULTIPLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL) ZONE.
WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law,
conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and
e:..
F, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all pertinent
testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined
that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
- Guidelines Section 15061 b(3), as amended for the project; and
' WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for develop-
ment in the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) .zone.
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and deter-
' mines as follows:
' A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and
shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls,
landscaping, driveways and other development features
_ required by the Official Zoning Ordinance.
' B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, will
not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding
properties or interfere with or endanger the public,
- health; safety, or welfare.
C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current
� zoning regulations and site plan submitted and approved
by the Site Plan Review Committee.
D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not
adversely affect the General Plan.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby
approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 23, provided the fol-
, lowing conditions are observed and complied with at all times.
' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable;'
° reguatLiosn of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform
Building Code and the Fire Code.
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or
structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community
Development Department, Planning Division, for review of
said Conditional Use Permit.
, 3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments.
4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a State-
ment of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, under-
- stands, and agrees to all conditions of this resolution
prior to issuance of any building permits.
?;;..
ti°�
�; ,•
, ,
�;',`',
:,�
�,.
;,`
,�
�+.`;�.
,;'.t:, .
�
; .
�
t,
; •
,
,
, ,
,
,
,
' PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS
� 5. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood
� main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving
� the proposed development.
�� 6. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one
� hundred and twenty (120) days after the use permitted has
been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised.
7. Construction shall commence within six (6) months from date
of issuance of building permits.
8. The site shall be develop to a maximum of six (6) dwelling
units.
_
9. Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25%)
percent of the lot area.
�
� lo. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed accordance
with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the
Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits.
The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs com-
bined with ground cover as follows: One (1) five (5) gallon
' shrub for each 100 square feet of landscaped area; and two
• (2) fifteen gallon trees for each 500 square feet of land-
scaped area.
?- 11. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped
r"' and shall consist predominately of plan materials except for
necessary walks, drives and fences.
12. A minimum of two (2) covered parking spaces per unit shall
'. be provided.
13. A six (6') foot high block wall shall be installed along the I
perimeter of the property, except within the twenty (20')
foot front yard setback, which shall not exceed four feet
; (4') in height. Construction of a fence in the front yard
setback is optional (not required).
14. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet. i
� 15. Final building elevations, including materials of construc- �
tion, shall be submitted to and approved by the Building
Official and the Planning Division prior to issuance of any
building permits.
16. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer '
shall pay $1.53 per square foot for residential buildings to-`
the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government
Code Section 53080. " I
17. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved. �
18. Accoustical construction materials shall be used throughout I
the units to mitigate freeway noise to the standards and
satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division.
19. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective material
including shingles, woodshake, asphalt composite, crushed I
rock and other similar roofing material that is not reflec- i
tive, glossy, or polished and/or roll form type metal roof- �
ing. �
DISK56:RES02294 I
I
I
I
I
;_.,�
; ,
I
I
1 `
) �
I
t ��
I
; 20. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of
brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar
material otkier than the reflective, glossy, polished and/or
rolled-formed type metal siding.
21. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the
street dedications.
22. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the
exterior elevation of the building must be approved by the
Director of Community Development or his/her designee.
23. Trash areas shall be enclosed by five (5') foot high decora-
tive masonry walls with gates.
^ 24. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in
a consistent manner, including the incorporation within the
side and rear building elevations of same or all of the
design elements used for the primary (front) facades.
, 25. That the applicant submit elevation drawings to the Planning
Division showing the exterior building design; including the
specification of colors, and materials.
". 26. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally
compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent
- buildings. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc.
shall be installed without the prior written approval of the
Director of Community Development.
27. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment,
swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical
devices shall be located within the rear yard or street side
yard of corner lot. Such equipment shall be screened from
surrounding properties and streets and so operated that they
do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring
residents, in accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance.
28. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in
„ sanitary condition pending construction and shall be main-
tained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure
to comply may result in revocation of the Conditional Use
Permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING
29. Provide documentation that lots composing the property were
legally tied together to the satisfaction of the Department
of Public Works. After reviewing the documents, the
Department of Public Works may require the submission and
recordation of a parcel map or lot merger.
30. Dedicate a five(5) foot wide strip of property along Birch
Street and a ten (10) foot wide strip of property along
Fernwood Avenue.
31. Dedicate required property at the northwest corner o£ Fern -
wood Avenue and Birch Street. '
32. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered
Civil Engineer.
33. Construct new sidewalk, curb and gutter, drive approach(es)
and required pavement alonq Birch Street in conjunction with
street widening. Prepare and submit a street improvement
plan, signed by a registered Civil Engineer.
DISK56:RES02294
�. . .
' 34. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk curb and gutter and required
adjacent pavement along Fernwood Avenue.
3b. Close existing drive approach and construct proposed drive
' approach(es) Per City standards.
36. Construct two (2) wheelchair ramp(s) at northwest and south-
` west corners of Fernwood Avenue and Birch Street.
37. No access through the rear alley is allowed. Alley will be
vacated.
38. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected
separately to the main sewer line. It may be advantageous
to construct an 8 inch sewer main line into the property.
Contact the Engineering Division for more details. -
39. Install three(3) 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood
standards along Fernwood Avenue and Birch Street. Type of
' species to be determined by the Engineering Division.
A permit to install the trees is required by the Engineering
Division. Exact locations of the tree(s) will be determined
at the time the permit is issued.
. 40. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass. "
;, 41. Provide and install two (2) marbelite street poles with
light fixtures, underground services and conduits on Eern-
wood Avenue and Birch Street.
42. Underground all utilities.
43. Obtain an improvement plan for the area surrounding the
subject project from Caltrans and submit it to the Depart-
ment of Public Works. Upon reviewing the plans, the Depart-
ment of Public Works will determine the required off-site
improvements to be completed by the applicant.
44. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all
off-site improvements.
45. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire
protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The
work shall be performed by a liscensed contractor hired by
the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the
Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any
work.
Install "Handle" type of shut-off valve at the customer side
of the meter. -
46. All facilities and utilities such as meters, street
_ light/power poles, utility mains and etc. in conflict with
the widening of Birch Street must be relocated.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
47. If security bars are placed on bedroom windows, at least one
window for each bedroom shall have quick release mechanisms
that does not require a key or any special knowledge.
U.B.C. Sec. 1204
48. Provide smoke detectors, (U.L. and State Fire Marshal ap-
proved type.)
;
Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to
the applicant.
' APPROVED AND ADOPTED this lOth day of October 1989, by
members of the Planning Commission as follows:
AYES:
' NOES:
, ABSENT:
ABSTAIN: °
P
' Donald Dove, Chairperson
� APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes
Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney
,.t .
DISK56:RES02294
I .
� �%
j q .
�` ��tPdJll I { El�� fVO.
DATE: October 10, 1989 C�SE �li�. cv� �-�
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECTt CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 24 (CUP 241
Applicant: Carlos Roman Pineda
PROPOSAL• �
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit I
to develop two two-story dwelling units and two single floor I
units at Fernwood Avenue, in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) �
zone. I
FACTS: I
1. Source of Authoritv
Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires that
a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to build or
relocate dwelling units in the R-3 zone.
2. Property Location
The subject property is an irregular lot that is located
along Fernwood Avenue between Century Route 105 and Platt
Avenue (see attached location map).
3. Propertv Size
The property along Fernwood Avenue is measured at one hundred �
and ninety-one (191') feet and along Copeland Street measured I
at one hundred (100') feet with a depth of one hundred and �
eight (180') feet with an area of approximately twelve thou- I
sand one hundred and sixty one (12,161) square feet.
4. Existing Land Use I
The property is presently vacant. The surrounding land uses
comprise of Multi-Family Dwelling units and are as follows:
North - Multi-Family Residential �
South - Proposed Century Route 105
East - Multi-Family Residential
West - Multi-Family Residential �
5. Land Use Description
The General P1an designation for the subject property is •
Multi-Family and the zoning classification is R-3 with the
following surrounding Land Uses.
'
6. General Plan Zonincx I
I
North - Multi-Family North - R-3 I
South - Multi-Family South - R-3
East - Multi-Family East - R-3 �
West - Multi-Family West - R-3
I
�
i
I
DISK 55:CUP24
I
I
I
I
i
—_ ' I
I � •
I �,
i . .
� 7. Project Characteristics
The applicant proposes to build four two-bedroom units com-
prising two two-story dwelling units and two single level
dwelling units situated on top of the garages. Each unit
will be provided with a two-car garage. For each of the
two-story units, the living room, dining area, kitchen and
one half bath will be located on the first floor while two
bedrooms and one full bath will be provided on the second
floor. The two single level dwelling units will be composed
of a living room, dining area, kitchen, two bedrooms, and one
full bath. Approximately forty-nine (49%) percent of the �
land is designated for landscaping. �
8. Site Plan Review
On September 28, 1989 the Site Plan Review Committee evaluat- (
ed the proposed development and recommended approval to the
Planning Commission with specific conditions.
I
9. Zonina Enforcement History I
�
None of Record i
10. Public Response �
None of Record I
I
Analysis and Conclusion• �
1. Consistencv with General Plan I
I
The property is consistent with the existing zoning classifi- �
cation (R-3) and the General Plan designation (Multi-Family). �
Therefore, qranting Conditional Use Permit No. 24 will not I
adversely affect the Lynwood General Plan.
I
2. Site Suitabilitv ,
The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
proposed development relative to density, bulk of the
structures, parking, walls, fences, landscaping, driveways
and other development features required by the Zoning Ordi-
nance.
The property is adequately served with the required public I
utilities and offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian acces- i
sibility.
I
3. Comnatibility �
The proposed development is surrounded by high density I
residential developments. Therefore, the project will be-'
compatible with developments in the area. �
4. Comoliance with Develobment Standards
The proposal meets all of the development standards required i
by the Zoning Ordinance with respect to parking; front, side,
and rear-yard setbacks; distance between structures; lot I
coverage; open space and landscaping; building height; unit �
size and density. �
f
5. Conditions of Aoproval
The improvements as proposed, subject to the condtions recom-
mended by the Site Plan Review Committee, would neither have !
a negative effect nor would it interfere with the values of �
the surrounding properties or endanger the public health, �
safety or welfare. �
�
i
i
�
� I
� • ., �
6. Benefits to Communitv
The proposed development will aid to aesthetically upgrade
the neighborhood and act as a catalyst in fostering other
quality developments. Furthermore, it will add favorably to
the City's housing stock and provide additional affordably-
priced housing in furtherance of the policies of the Housing
Element of the General Plan.
7. Environmental Assessment
The Community Develoment Department has determined that the
project could not have a significant effect on the environ-
ment. Therefore, Notice of Exemption has been prepar ed and I
is on file in the Community Development Department and the
office of the City Clerk.
RECOMMENDATION• j
I
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Plan-
ning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2295:
1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the I
provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by Section
15061 b(3). �
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 24, subject to the I
stated conditions and requirements. I
I
Attachments• I
1. Location Map �
2. Resolution No. 2295 �
3. Plot Plan !
i
�
I
�
�
�
�
I
�
I
i
i
I
i
disk 55:cup24 �
�
i
I
i
I
i
�
�
�
(
_ I
.
LOCATION iVIAP
__..� � ��
t , ° ,� � T ,°,~� 1,°, �p 46 � � 1 _-----
-� � � ���.��,p , � . � CT/IMO6 "..
PC.17T �p ra ��r.���J �� � � ��Z � \e� E ' ` /o t- a `� .
°� io� � so h� � � ro � rn rn y � e7a J ^ �� J A R'r T�� 1 1,�i ...
. � � � 2 � M o� � � M �" � `e' �� / � � � �, � . ..
n Q' � b I i� �:� � � � Wo i M `' y 9^ �a� /3 4 / 'i� / �
�., :� l�� � �� �' �¢ n �M M ��,�� .,� � ��, � �3�'/,�����6/ �Q`".° I
p .. � ri�r � �iivv � I �D ���'h "�/ ����' ^ph �asa V � n `'��� ry �9�. � /� y y .�� a $ , , I
' ny/\, 6
,. � 6 4 a, ,� O
r � � .. � � � � i � Fry h� J, �5 � �/ �� yry �� `o ` � y / �9 h U .... I
r�
� J ' .a• ��e � �� y � h � �J�C�?�a o �v (h . �
�?� � � ,� � � �� ' �Yy z " ^'� �"'`' � y ` �
�
ro � � ,� p "f � �>,� `� ��yvo'�� \ �� � �
. ^� 'hr°� �'i¢t / �p �i � ` �,� Y� s ° � :>:..I
' �/ n � ry s � Jos . � v cj n � ,p � j'yc'1 � i, �r� \ � �.. �
a �� c �°� ��� ► � l 'Z�9 �
' �� ' �t�� �� J \ ;�� ��` � ' \\ 9 /y� / v �''`�.'h'Sa' ,o � ��i� �� J � �:'I
�Y Q I
� A� � b/ °o .?t... ��YJ� %� . � .
� SM J t o 5 �; /� � . 6 �Ya �' �°� � :�
7iv� xr �n�/� �oQ ..� � ��y & v o � '_ �A<
xm izs �J � A �� r �^/ u(�' q 1' , I
� //r7y"S1l - » p� �Q� �//y '` �Y7s i'��s�J�'b�'Wv ,Ta
� i/ /' •'0 4 y � � . � /iYJ� ' �p \)0 iz�� ^�� % �'
� ' i. rn I ` ' y .� II z '°� � Q. @ ��Y� . % " � V : i
i /IYFO B � � i I � � o ��4. � �7� a � � ° �n y � � si; �r / �� i
� it^ sza �� ( �I �", io �''�' .,q � � °' a " P� °.° �° -:
, /iloJ, �s I �� � u soo �0� �� i /yg� V� � �YBcj� //y I
� 5,70 4 � �` h �/fo° C 'f'!� � 'Pl� 0 ''��v7 ��/y77 �oo .
� sii _—'SLZ ` i,r � Q\ S� � �i- 11' 1 ,�' o � lI yf \ R��: " I
y. � So I
ia>�. y /i o8eo y `� ' � ,. l�Y �, _,
//S/O W �� 0 S' 13\ \
� ` � � r�i � //b% M / � t �� �� 1s� �' o .;y` / � � S I
�__ o. � � �
!/ aa —1zz ' � � aa \ /� a;`� v.i e° ' � a/SV` v�� �^ � � / „ ' � o , e f
ii.rag Afr 6^ /��� �,�`�u^���a'' /Yq6�
� /iSa� iisli su , � �'' ' n �� o � ' '`�a^,p .� v 2 °,, �' '
� s�s u�.�sa.r, ti �Y s /h ,y y� . n, k� /��< , .'"j
fi.f3 p h � . �G �O� � /u� � �� v ' �I
q,JS ��,f3r � tih h � �� i i�, '°- �� � "�� . I
l� n � ,� ii.rv� � _/ � �� ,� ti"`� �? n,� ,� ��., �� F�� ,'�° ^
� f
h .t» a,'r� Q � ° o .•� '�tr b / ti b � �o q� C�
o � 2 '
//J vo I o o��'o � ^r (�� � � �Y 'Q °'..
ti 0 ^o '�� ^' W� `/S � //.fY� , v 3 0 \`1 J O �� C
e0
�� } ryb 'p
. � �I9 b .3'� � � �/� cl : � �� / ` ,Q �' °� � �` a` o �\�Lli
4 /9 v �
//'
/ldGJ i .�M ��4 IO � J 1 'b .. r �� �7 % � /` .
�so ,, T �. , e cQ =� �. , 'S ;c ,�� �j
e
V i /G b J r � � F\ ,s, h >o n°�b'ti / n � � i / ��a° / : ,+ 'V�� / , a''' � I
. � .a;anl _� .�� n, J B � � : / , .-�_ n� �
i
i
1
i
I
�
_.._
---- j � : � s: , 7
� �
�
�
G �� .�z � '
N :�
�� ,
�r-- ;
:�
:�
.
�
►
sc�ce r'-.�oa ,: �
�
__. ... '?> �
,
, _ -----..t � '
.,
� ` ���= LYNWOOD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
���,�*
LeVONEIA 4 STEELE, Etl.O, SUPERINTEN�ENT OF SCHOOLS 11991 PLAZA
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 80282
CLIFFORD A. KOCH (t17) BOJ4105
ASSISiANT SUPERINTENDENi.
BUSINE55 SERVIGES
September 28, �989
Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
City of Lynwood
� 1330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, CA 90262
RE; Potential Impact of Proposed Development on Public School
System Case No. CUP 24 .
Dear Mr. Mas: I,
Please be advised that the Lynwood Unified School District has ` I
received notice of the above application for the proposed residential I
development, to be iocated at the corner of Fernwood and Copeland, f
Lynwood California.
The proposed development is located in the Wilson Elementary School I
Attendance Area, This school is currently overcrowded an although
portable classrooms are being used to help alleviate the problem, the �
long range solution to the overcrowded conditions requires the
construction of several new schoois. This long range solution will I
take three to five years.
In addition, any proposed new enroilees due to this residential project I
bot which age exper en ng e e�e overcrowded n�d tions �oi, �
The impact of this development to our enroliment may be as follows:
Primary: 0.6 Yield Factor x 4 units = 2,4 new students
Secondary: 0,3 Yield Factor x 4 units = 1. new students I
Considering that all of our schools are aiready overcrowded this new I
development has a very NEGATIVE impact on the School District. I
If you require any further information, please feel free to contact us. I
Very„�ulY Yours, � I
C'
CUFFO�CH
Assistant Superintendent, I
Business Services (
CAK:bm I
xr. LaVoneia C. Steele, Ed. D. �
�
�
I
I
i
�
�
�
i
_ I �
�r
a I
�� �
': ` , I
� � - �� � ��
. � I
;�
;
;i�
„ �: I
: ,: i
�
� I
,
i �
+-- . �
CUP 24
RESOLUTION NO. 2295
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDI-
TIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 24 (CUP 24) FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR (4), TWO STORY
TOWNHOUSES AT FERNWOOD AND COPELAND
AVENUES, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, IN THE R-3
(MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ) ZONE. �
WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law,
conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and �
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all pertinent
testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined
that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA �
Guidelines Section 15061 b(3), as amended for the project; and
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for develop- �
ment in the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone. I
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and deter-
mines as follows:
A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and
shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls,
landscaping, driveways and other development features
required by the Official Zoning Ordinance. �
i
B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, will
not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding
properties or interfere with or endanger the public,
health, safety, or welfare.
C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current
zoning regulations and site plan submitted and approved
by the Site Plan Review Committee.
D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not �
adversely affect the General Plan. '
E. The proposed development will add favorably to the
housing stock and will provide additional affordably
priced housing in concert with the policies of Housing
Element of the General Plan.
F The proposed development will aid aestheticall u �
y pgrad- �
ing the area and will act as a catalyst in fosterinq
other quality developments. I
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, i
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby �
approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 23, provided the fol-
lowing conditions are observed and complied with at all times.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I
1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable
regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform
Building Code and the Fire Code.
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or
structures thereon, shall be first reported to the Community
Development Department, Planninq Division, for review of
said Conditional Use Permit. �
i
I
I
�
I
�. .
3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City ,
Departments.
4. The applicant and/or his representative shall sign a State-
ment of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, under-
stands, and aqrees to all conditions of this resolution
prior to issuance of any building permits.
PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS
I
5. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood �
main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving I
the proposed development. �
I
6. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void one
hundred and twenty (120) days after the use permitted has I
been abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised.
7. Construction shall commence within six (6) months from date I
of issuance of building permits. I
8. The site shall be develop to a maximum of four (4) dwelling I
units.
9. Landscaped areas are to be a minimum of twenty-five (25$) �
percent of the lot area. +
10. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed accordance I
with a detailed plan to be submitted and approved by the I
Planning Division prior to issuance of any building permits.
I
The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs com- �
bined with ground cover as follows: One (1) five (5) qallon I
shrub for each 100 square feet of landscaped area; and two i
(2) fifteen gallon trees for each 500 square feet of land-
scaped area.
11. The required front, rear, and side yards shall be landscaped �
and shall consist predominately of plan materials except for �
necessary walks, drives and fences.
12. A minimum of two (2) covered parking spaces per unit shall I
be provided. i
13. A six (6') foot high block wall shall be installed along the
perimeter of the property, except within the twenty (20') I
foot front yard setback, which shall not exceed four feet
(4') in height. Construction of a fence in the front yard '
setback is optional (not required). �
I
14. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet. � �
15. Final buildinq elevations, including materials of construc- �
tion, shall be submitted to and approved by the Building �
Official and the Planning Division prior to issuance of any I
building permits.
16. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer
shall pay $1.53 per square foot for residential buildings to
the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government
Code Section 53080.
i
17. All driveway and parkinq areas shall be paved. �
18. Accoustical construction materials shall be used throughout �
the units to mitigate freeway noise to the standards and i
satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division.
I
�
�
z �
I
,
(
� ,. I
19. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective material
including shingles, woodshake, asphalt composite, crushed
rock and other similar roofing material that is not reflec-
tive, glossy, or polished and/or roll form type metal roof-
ing.
20. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of
brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar
material other than the reflective, glossy, polished and/or
rolled-formed type metal siding.
21. All front yard setbacks must be measured from inside the
street dedications. �
22. Prior to obtaining a building permit, the design of the I
� exterior elevation of the building must be approved by the �
Director of Community Development or his/her designee. �
23. Trash areas shall be enclosed by five (5') foot high decora- j
tive masonry walls with gates. I
24. All building elevations shall be architecturally treated in '
a consistent manner, including the incorporation within the �
side and rear building elevations of same or all of the �
design elements used for the primary (front) facades.
i
25. That the applicant submit elevation drawings to the Planning
Division showing the exterior building design; including the
specification of colors, and materials.
26. All security fences, grills, etc. shall be architecturally I
compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent ;
buildings. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc. ;
shall be installed without the prior written approval of the i
Director of Community Development.
27. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment, �
swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical
devices shall be located within the rear yard or street side �
yard of corner lot. Such equipment shall be screened from �
surrounding properties and streets and so operated that they i
do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring
residents, in accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance. �
28. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in �
sanitary condition pending construction and shall be main- +
tained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. Failure �
to comply may result in revocation of the Conditional Use �
Permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING �
29. Provide documentation that lots composing the property were �
legally tied together to the satisfaction of the Department �
of Public Works. After reviewing the documents, the �
Department of Public Works may require the submission and ;
recordation of a parcel map or lot merger. �
30. Dedicate a five(5) foot wide stri of �
p property along Cope-
land Avenue and ten (10) foot wide strip of property along �
Fernwood Avenue.
31. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered i
Civil Engineer. �
32. Construct new sidewalk, curb and gutter, drive approach(es)
and required pavement along Copeland Street in conjunction
with street widening. Prepare and submit a street improve- �
ment plan, signed by a registered Civil Engineer. �
�
3
i
< .
33. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk curb and gutter and required
adjacent pavement alonq Fernwood Avenue.
34. Close existing drive approach and construct proposed drive
approach(es) Per City standards.
35. Construct two (2) wheelchair ramp(s) at northwest and north-
east corners of Fernwood Avenue and Birch Street.
36. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected
separately to the main sewer line. It may be advantageous
to construct an 8 inch sewer main line into the property.
Contact the Engineering Division for more details. i
37. Install three(3) 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood �
standards along Fernwood Avenue and Copeland Street. Type �
of species to be determined by the Engineering Division.
A permit to install the trees is required by the Engineering i
Division. Exact locations of the tree(s) will be determined ,
at the time the permit is issued. �
38. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass. !
(
39. Provide and install two (2) marbelite street poles with ;
light fixtures, underground services and conduits on Fern- I
wood Avenue and Copeland Street �
i
40. Underground all utilities. I
41. Obtain an improvement plan for the area surrounding the !
subject project from Caltrans and submit it to the Depart-
ment of Public Works. Upon reviewing the plans, the Depart-
ment of Public Works will determine the required off-site �
improvements to be completed by the applicant. I
42. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all i
off-site improvements.
43. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire '
protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The �
work shall be performed by a liscensed contractor hired by �
the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the
Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any �
work. �
Install "Handle" type of shut-off valve at the customer side i
of the meter.
i
44. All facilities and utilities such as meters, street ;
light/power poles, utility mains and etc. in conflict with �
the widening of Copeland Street must be relocated. �
FIRE DEPARTMENT
i
45. If security bars are placed on bedroom windows, at least one '
window for each bedroom shall have quick release mechanisms I
ect a 2 pq not require a key or any or any special knowledge. U.B.C, i
46. Provide smoke detectors, (U.L, and State Fire MarshaT approved type.) '
i
I
�
�
i
Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to
the applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this lOth day of October 1989, by
members of the Planning Commission as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT: '�
ABSTAIN: I
I
i
Donald Dove, Chairperson I
�
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: I
I
I
Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes !
Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney �
�
I
i
�
�
I
I
i
�
I
i
�
i
AGE�?DA ITf�M ��0. �
DATE: October 10, 1989 ���� �" „ , „. _, ,��
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
�: �.1G_G J ��....,�
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director .
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit- Case No. 25
Applicant: Oscar O. Aparicio
PROPOSAL: ,
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit
to develop an auto center in the C-2A zone at 10749 Long Beach
Boulevard.
FACTS:
The applicant is proposing to develop an approximately 21,256 �
auto service center, retail parts, tire and storage facility, and
offices. i
Staff, upon recommendation of the Site Plan Review Committee, '
recommends continuance of this item in order to allow modifica- i
tion and revision of the proposed plans. �
RECOMMENDATION: �
Staff respectfully request that, after consideration, the Plan- �
ning Commission continue Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 25 (CUP
25) to its regularly scheduled meeting on November 14, 19sg.
i
�
I
DISK �52:CUP25
�
�
;
----.. . I
. . .. .. . ..
• _-
_,
•�� DATE: October 10, 1989
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION AG �� i pA �-����► NO , .�.�
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director 3
Community Development Depart�� NO.
SUBJECT: Variance Case No. 3
Applicant: Elias Ayoub
PROPOSAL•
The applicant is requesting a variance to erect a ten foot high
monument sign in the HIrID (Hospital-Medical-Dental) zone at 3654
E. Imperial Highway, Lynwood.
FACTS•
1. Source of Authority
While Section 25.33 5.5 of the Sign Ordinance regulates the
construction of freestanding monument signs,
Section 25-26 requires that a Variance be obtained from the
Planning Comm'ission when, because of special circumstances
applicable to the property, the strict application of the
Zoning or Sign Ordinance deprives such property of privileges
enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical
zoning classification.
2. PROPERTY LOCATION AND SZZE
The property is located on the south side of Imperial Highway
between Century Boulevard and Stockwell Drive. The property
is rectangular in shape and is approximately 6,000 square
feet (50'x120').
3. EXISTING LAND USE
The site is developed with a medical building and is sur-
. rounded by the following land uses:
North - Commercial
South - Residential
East - Commercial (Medical)
west - Commercial
4. LAND USE DESCRIPTION
GENERAL PLAN ZONING
North - Commercial CB-1
South - Multi-Family R-3
East - Commercial �
West - Commercial �`'ID
5. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
The variance request would allow the applicant to locate a
� mornunent sign without the 150 foot street frontage required, arid to erect
1 a 10 foot high monument sign instead of a pes.initted 6 foot monwnent sign.
I
6. Site Plan Review
I j At its regular meeting of Septe�nbei 28, 1989 the Site Plan Review Cortmittee
� rec.�nded denial of the proposed signage.
� 7. Zoning Enforcement History
I
! None of History,
I
� DISK 53:VAR3
i
l
�
i�
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION:
, 1. Consistency with General Plan
The Proposed Land Use is consistent with the existing zoning
being classified as Hospital-Medical-Dental (HI�ID) however the
General Plan designation is commercial. This inconsistency
will be resolved during the General Plan update.
2. Site Suitability
The property is adequaEe in size and shape to accomodate a
standard sign relative to structures, parking, walls, fences,
landscaping, driveways and other development features re-
quired by the Zoning Ordinance.
3. Compatibility •
The proposed monument sign and height is incompatible with
the height and type of signs on neighboring properties, which
mostly are wall signs.
4. COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Specific Findings:
According to the Data and Sign Plans submitted by the appli-
cant, all sign plans indicate that the proposed sign is a
pole sign and not a monument sign.
Ordinance No. 1322 of the City of Lynwood with respect to
regulating freestanding signs city wide calls for a minimum
of 150 feet of street frontage for all monument siqns. The
subject property has a frontage of only 50 linear feet thus,
lacking 100 linear feet.
Further the Ordinance with regard to monument signs in com-
mercial zones allows signs up to 6 feet above finished grade.
The applicant proposes a 10 foot sign thus making a differ-
ence of 4 feet in height.
Additional sign height may be approved for a commercial or
industrial center, if approved as part of a site plan by the
City's Site Plan Review Committee. However, under no cir-
cumstance shall any sign exceed ten (10) feet in height or 50
sq.ft. (per side) in sign area.
The proposed monument sign and height is incompatible with
the height and type of signs on neighboring properties, which
are mostly wall signs.
If the applicant were to be granted a 10 foot high monument
sign, the sign would only have optimum visibility from the
east traveling west on Imperial Highway. If one were to be
� traveling east on Imperial Highway one would not see the sign
� until one got in front of the Medical Building.
I After reviewing the sign proposal, the applicant does not meet the findings
required in Section 25-26.7 for a variance. Nor, are there any exceptions
or extiaordinavy findings that would give staff reason to reoamiend the
I granting of a variance. The Redeveloprt�ent Agency is not willing to support
the variance as mentioned. (see attachment)
� The property is a standard lot with no hardships experienced that would
� require an exceptional privilege and does not meet the State requirements
� for findings of a Vaziance.
I
I
I
I
1
;
' Undoubtedly grantinq of this Variance would set a precedent
in the city that would eventually result in the increased
construction of eigns of this nature.
5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Staff has determined that this project is categorically
exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as
amended by Section 15061 b(3�. Therefore, a Notice of Exemp-
tion has been prepared and is on file in the Community Devel-
opment Department_ and the office of the City Clerk.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the
Planning Commission deny the Variance Request:
a. Finding that a hardship has not been established that
• would require a Variance for Case No. 3 as determined
by Section 25-26 of the City of Lynwood Zoning Code.
b. Finding that the applicant will not be deprived of
privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties
in the same vicinity if the recommendation of denial
is upheld.
1. Location Map
2. Applicant's Plans
3. Memorandum fran Redevelopnent Agency
DISK53:VAR3
I
(
I
�
i
I
�
�
i
;I
��
�
�"�7 - .�i ;,.�.
•
o` � ' �
a, . 3 ��s ,�� a
�i� �ri
Op
��� . L9� �/, o y
5 � , p
' p . i��� n
�ai , � �� OCiii �
i C . 9oi� Sai �
o! �7 s�i �
iy��i �
T� ,... n ,
♦r
r �/ D . ��O/ �� / p' ( f0� � V y�
4 a 4 L!I 0�1/ �.t� � 'n
bM c, �af d y�o� 2 p "
i 1
Sfo r1 ���� �r a ter 8'� D�irew
, o.�', 9 �' � /6C i�N ,
�
� O � � V �
n
H
A � — � �
� � o°
b
� '�
0
e
�
Q ZI
�
�
,+ s
\
,'„a 9
9c �
�
�° '-� •e
� ri /
Y'' ���+
e �.d���
0
ry J l. L�J � .0°� �
7Y/113dW/ t
4 �
� � � O a � 1 O
Z
�13�1
�
, ��u�a���•��
� � �.,.�a. �
0/� � i0/RI
� a • y iOPS'
a/
. � ' --�G
sy b0 2S
/ d'��
���3
�
T 0�-
�
s. � �'�s
7. •
,��' W
�� �
4
Yb �j, �
v
NOlbl'1V o
O'i 1C]I�
� � 01 , V �
b � � ^ ti � �
2 � �' �
r
i �
�
� F1I/OZ_ O
r �p ' �
� � � �
PZ 0 � t
_.— r� '
d�dW NOIld�O�
,
;;
MEMORANDUM
September 18, 1989
TO: Aubrey Fenderson
Planning Manager
FROM: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson
Economic Development Manager '
RE: VARIANCE NO. 3 �
The Redevelopment Division submits the following comments
referenced the subject proposal in the Redevelopment Project
Area A:
ANALYSIS:
The subject property is located on the south side of
Imperial Highway between Martin Luther King Boulevard and
Stockwell Drive. The request was recently denied by the
Redevelopment Division staff because it did not meet the
requirements of the city's sign regulations.
The applicant has selected to file this Variance instead of
changing the sign. The zoning ordinance allows a maximum
height of six (6') feet above grade for a monument sign.
The sign as proposed is ten (10') feet high.
The lot is a typical lot in the HI�ID zone (see attached
assessor's map). The applicant is correct is stating that
the property is setback further from the street that the
other properties. However, in staff's professional opinion,
this is not a justification for a Variance. Staff is
further concerned that approval of this sign height Variance
may set a precedent encouraging the installation of non-
conforming signs in the HI�ID zone.
Staff is unable to establish the Findings needed for
approval of the Variance.
SPECZFIC FINDINGS:
A. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
or conditions applicable to the development site that do
not apply generally to sites in the same zoning district
(HI�ID), in that the lot in question is a typical lot in
the HI+ID zone.
V16A:VAR3
I
�
I
i
1
B. Granting the application is not necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property
right of the applicant, and to prevent unreasonable
property loss or unnecessary hardship in that a sign
with a maximum height of 6 feet can be installed on the
property and would appropriately address the concerns
of vehicle and pedestrian visibility.
C. Granting the application may be detrimental or injurious
to property or improvements in the vicinity of the
development site, or to the public health, safety or
general welfare because it may set a precedent
encouraging non-conforming signs in the neighborhood.
D. Granting the application is not consistent with the
General Plan and the zoning ordinance and would
constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent
with limitation on other properties in the vicinity and
in the same zoning district, in that it would legitimize
an illegal sign, thus encouraging installation of signs
which do not meet city standards.
It is recommended that this application be denied.
###
I
I
I
I
i
I
i
I V16A:VAR3
1
I
i
�
i
' _ —
50'
-� r-- - - --
i
i
i
i
� I
' .� !
I �
i ��� � � i r � �— �
� �
�� ��
�--- �
0,
�
� � ��
� �
. � � '
� ---
�
I � t �vrl.�u��+r �rc�,�, ���,�E _ _ �
�x►s � �������� �
r
--------- F X ► � j �c., _ � j �. � � T _
� 0/89
f� __
. ;.�- �- <
Aitachment l.
5. State in your own words:
a. ihe improvement you Intend to make of ihe above described property:
Plans call for a 10' high monument sign in order to identify
the specific business of the occupants of the building, This
applications requests variances from set policy.
b. . The provlsions or reshictions of the code which prohlbit ihe requested use:
A request to locate a monument sign within the 150 foot
frontage required. This site does not have a 150 foot
• frontage; and,
A request to erect a 10' high monument sign instead of a b'
monument sign.
� ... :.:..:.:...:.:..-:... .
� / C , :.
�
Attachment 2.
6. The property is presently improved as follows:
The improvements to the outside include a six foot high decorative
wrought iron fence, completely new landscaping with timed water
sprinklers, a re-stuccoed building with color blending into the
surrounding decor, a clay tile decorative parapet roof, a completely
redesigned front with decorative planters, decorative wrought iron
coverings with new wood framing for the windows, a paving brick
sidewalk on the side. On the interior, the forestry is being removed, the �
electrical system is being brought up to code, the carpets are all bein�
replaced, the waiting room area has been enlarged, the planter area is
being enclosed, the ceiling is being re-sprayed, all of the plumbing is
being brought up to code, walls are being stripped, wallpapered
and/or painted according to the decorators' plan.
. � . . ( ��
Attachment 3.
Unnumbered item:
There are excepTional or spedal circumstances appllcable to the properiy including size, shape,
Topography, locatlon or surroundings In the following respect:
The property is a narrow strip, iwo-thirds of the width being
occupied by the structure. The balance is in landscaping
surrounded by a 6' high ornamental heavy wrought iron fence for
security and aesthetic purposes. Having been completely
remodeled, the site requires a sign calling attention to the offices.
All of the other properties in the area have large signs or exposure
to traffic. The building to the east is offset and has a high sign
advertising its location. The building to the west occupies
approximately the same positioning, blocks the exposure of this
property to the east, but, because of the setback of the buildings
in the shopping center has a lot of exposure from the east. The
only parcel not enjoying exposure is 3654. The only exposure for
this building is that from a drive by on Imperial Highway. This
being the case, the recognition of the property by the sign
attached to the front of the building does not occur until you
have reached the building itself.
. . ._ � .. �_ �
Attachment 4.
8. The granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or Injurlous
to the property or Improvements in such zone or vlcinity In which the properiy is located , for ihe
following reasons:
To the contrary, the permit, if granted will enhance the properly
and the improvements in the area. The sign design will impact
favorably and augment the renovations made. The monument
sign will be sufficiently set back as not to block or obstruct the
view or provide a safety hazard for anyone or any properiy in the
area. It will be of such design as to comply with or exceed all
building codes and standards, providing an additional degree of
safety. Further, if no easily visible sign is available, patients
searching for the building could cause a traffic hazard on Imperial
Highway, by slowing on the throughway, while looking for the
address. With higher visibility, and the ability to locate the
building in advance, they could plan the turn into the street
necessary to reach the parking area. Otherwise, the reaching of
the location, then seeing the sign on the building, concomitant .
with slowing down, being in a quandary as to where to turn
would cause a major traffic hazard.)
I
�
�
� , �. �
Attachment 5.
9. Such varlance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substanilal properly right of
the applicant, because:
Without the ability to post a sign that is visible much hardship
could be caused to the patients looking for the offices. In this
case, a number of patients, upon geiting discouraged about
locating the building would give up the search and find another
doctor. This would substantially injure the overall business.
. . _ � .. (, �
Attachment b.
10. The granting of such variance will not adversely affect ihe comprehensive general plan, by
reason of ihe following:
The comprehensive general plan calls for orderly growth and
aesthetically designed renovations and construction in Lynwood.
The improvements already made to the location, including
building, landscaping and construction are commensurate with
the wishes described in the plan. Further, the granting of this
variance will not cause any deviation from the intent of the
generai pian for standards for the construction and renovation of
the area. The sign for which variance is requested would be of
such taste as to complement the pian.
I
I ; .
. � . �. �-
� Aart Assink Associates T00 Border Ave. Torrance, CA 90501 213-618-0182
ProJect: Client: dob No.:
A�2/� �u�l,n �jo�l�v
�"10 YJ U T�l � 1�1�' S 1lpFJ Eng'r: �1 /� Date: ( /2�/�� Sht No.: /� /z
F-155
5�-0 �l = /d �"
���� w��o :
i
i , P° P, fr°2
,�t i ;o -�-
� � ----- P, =�5)�3)<�� � 3�
Pa �, m _ �
�- �; ,4 P2 =� �9) �?o) = Il�
P� ` � : N � = 9-�0'�
� � I —� X = 3a�('I�.S) -f- !�0(l2) � 1.3G�3�
Z 0 ' �f�u
��
' A , ` ' ��o�A y. l�'� ° 9ld��f3.G3�� Co.2� ��
� qscn G�c�s
f� '� p°`e 1�src-�..� �-�x� : �c1S� A3� GT 6�
pia -
? �O.`z�.17� � 2.2¢��3
I ��pE°� AL � ` �S 2 (l.?,3� ,
I I (��GE��SEEOEjAIV�C��3�� � CIS� � OC.-�
/��lG . �
A - � I ��C sula/_�� �
rN � - I 3��f �2r'lii..lE �t�"
� �'
��_ SE� A77�ci�� G'�w�d�
r�oT� . __�.nesTAL ��s� A�A�,Y�S ,�
�.o ��. 5 u��o u+�a�n 6`( , ,.
�„ j° LA�'�"�i� • 'b = s � o
�rL G'/Ll7��/,4 �
Us� �c� �-�' P�ss,�,�. �o,��sv�. � �b� Fo�
�C7 �(.� /�� U[�G 7[�Px-� 2s� . � ��� �:
' � . ?�p�'T�+ �xT, �,�,T.� , ,,,,.c,,,:,, .
, ��� - <,` �' �LAST,=_°� ' ,j,��,.'�; -.Sl�,�
� � . .\ =�. �;i`. i; ,' ``''.
.+ i_ : ��. ` ;,���`�, ', :•
� !LX 4 -�-�-[ U� ; c ,` �" %.
4)' `� _ �.' � �ti.g,.�'
-s• -
11'F'• °i 4""� P`1°� - �-- �� -
CO L . -
� . - - � °x 20" �°�t� esTfi L � - ..: �' �. ,
-� � • -• _�ASE ��`(ou� `cr"
� ��-�-�� � , ����r .,,,., .;�,,�• 1
I
"_ , (:, (-::,
• PP.GE : �L o� 2
PROJECT:
----------
' -------------------
S�J 8J Er? ;
BY :--- DP.TE --------
RE�'l1IREMENTS FOR EMBEDDED POLES
Per U.B.0 2907 (f) 1
LOCe.TION : sign pele
A.L�OWP.BLE STRESSES :
? A.11�wable Passive Pressure (Lateral) = 200 psf / ft of depth
> Maximum .411owable Passive Pressure = 2000 psf : For No Limi*_
Enter -? 0
? Do�..s Lateral Restraint at
Ground Surface Exist? Y=1 N=0 . 0
? Load D.�ratim Factor = 1.33
LOP.DING De,7e, ;
? A.pplied Point Load = 4.60 tt Point Load
? Load Height a�ve Base = 13.63 ft Mrn�ent @ Base = 6,270 ft-tt
> Uniform Lateral Load = 0#/ft Uniform Load
? Dist. frem Base to Btm. = 0 f*_ Moment @ Base = 0 ft-#
? Dist. 4rcm Base to Top = 0 ft ----
To*_al Mar..n*_ = 6,270 ft-#
? POLE TYPE :
1=? Ra�nd 2=? Rectangular : 1
? POLE WIDTH NORM4L TO FORCE = 16 in
, MINIMUM REQUIRED EMBEIXNENT :
Nm-Restrained :
Depth =e./2 ('I+(1+4.36h/.o.)".5) = 6.50 ft
where: P. 2.34P/(51 b; -------
Restrained : .
Depth =( 4.25 P h/ S3 h)"'.S = NP.ft
Le.TERe.L PRESSURES :
i Allo�.�able @ 1/3 of Embedrnent = 433 psf
Actual @ 1/3 ofi Embedment 4OB psf
1 sllowable @ Base of Embedment = 1,271 psf
P.ctual @ Base of Em6edment NA. pst
Su�face Restraint Force = NP. 12 �
. � - � I �
... -;..
,�: �: <:`; , �::f, ,
� ,:.., ,f,
� Fx
� " �<,
��` = i 2-3, I 0°� `�:;��
,� -..,.:.. �
� � ��
` Y: `.. • lf �
� ��
� `��. " ..°_, ������
I > � . ,,. `_,;,�,\,
$ ! �-��- �.;,,_ .:; %'y
I �\�u�" Y
e ` � �t1� � 1Q'
� I
' �; !Vx4 �(',T, -o �vV
i t " �
�� /2 �' x�c� Lt�ucn
� G�fa � Go P-. !J � R
� . . ' o , _
c� � � +' o � - �
� :� � <� I _
� 6 `.
� � t��Tv�,� �?-�AO�
� t � �� �. 'II�'._�'�i�
- . I . � . ilf�- I�'�
� � a � f -
.,_
I � ` � _ �Yoy�,a"x24" H�<vtl
� � �ouc. �AS�
k
C
'l,p�' .
_ �h�; i
i
-: �'� o��� ,�� � ��-�--.,�>� �-- '' �"
_ -__ _::: _ : r_/2,�^_ � �. - _._ . ZJ