HomeMy Public PortalAboutA 1988-03-08 PLANNING COMMISSION . �.
m' �
A ' �
,� r ,�,: . . . . .. .. _ .. ..
z ! FtECEl1lED
� . CITY OF LYNWOOD I
' - CITY CLERKS OFFICE
;
�,. � A � MAR 04 1988 �
? 7 i 8 i 9 �l0�lli12ili2 i 3 i 4 i � 6
� A G E N D. A
�
; " LYNWOOD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION'}:+� ��I�V' �
� ,wa,; ��
' ' REGULAR MEETING - 7:30 P.M. A���'`'`'/�
� City Hall Council Chambers /
�' � 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, CA.
a
a
;
a, . .
�-
� '
;� � March 8, 1988
s
a
� , ;
;; C 0 M M I S S I O N E R S:
�. .
' , ' Lucille Kanka
� - Chairperson •
�
,
� Donald Dove Roy Pryor
� Vice-Chairperson Commissioner
�
a
a
; 'Lena Cole-Dennis Eugene Raymond
z Commissioner - Commissioner '
j _ • - -- --
� �- Alberto Montoya Penalber - -- Dav�-d J. Willis, Jr.
� Commissioner Commissioner
A
y
�
�" � �
� S T A F F:
N �, .
;
� Director of Community Development Planners
a
� Vicente L. Mas Dorethea Tilford
� Acting Senior Planner
�
; Commission Counsel .
y
Henry S. Barbosa
'y
:; Douglas D. Barnes
:�
�-. .
�
:F
� �I '', . . . .
? /
� 3��V10:Agencovr
� ��•""
� ,e
b
� .
�
a . .
�
:�
��
=P.
:��
�.
� .� .
� MARCH 8, 1988
�
�
OPENING CEREMONIES
A.. Call meeting to order.
�
B. Flag Salute.
C. Roll Call.
D. Certification of Agenda posting
E. Approval of Minutes of February 9, 1988
� :
� CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
�
� 1. Conditional Use Permit Case No. 87097
� 4271 Carlin Avenue (Teresita Valdez)
�
� Comments •
�
�
� The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval
> to re-open a convalescent hospital in the R-3 (Multiple.
� Family Residential) zone.
:�
� This matter was continued from the February 9, 1988
Planninq Commission meeting in order that the applicant
would be able to submit certain documents with respect to •
the administration of the facility and applicant's track
record.
Recommended Action:
� Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
' Planning Commission cont'inue this case to the meeting of
- April 12, 1988. .
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS:
2. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87104
3547 Mulford Avenue (Antonio and Porfirio Corn)
� " Comments:
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to
construct two apartments at the rear of an existing
dwelling unit in the R-3 (MUltiple-Family Residential) zone.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2167:
a. Finding that Conditional Use Permit No. 87104 is exempt
from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as
amended.
b. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 87104, subject to
stated conditions and requirements.
V10:Agenda
:�
1
�;
Ha
-e
�.
� ';
.�
� .
�� .
�
�
� 3. Conditional Use Permit No. 87106
=� 5130 Imperial Highway Eric Osorio)
�
� � Comments:
�
�� The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to allow the installation and repair of automobile
2 alarm systems at subject address in the C-3 (Heavy
� Commercial) zone.
� ;
= Recommended Action
� �
� Staff respectfully request that, after consideration, the
� Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2183:
�
�
� a. Finding that Coriditional Use Permit Case No. 87106
� will not have a significant effect on the
� environment, and is exempt from the provisions of
� the State CBQA Guidelines, as amended.
b. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 87106,
subject to the stated conditions and requirements.
4. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88000
3827 Century Boulevard (0'dell Hadley)
�
Comments•
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to open
a retail store and sell new and used items.
�
� Recommended Action:
�
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
= Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2168:
�. � a. Findinq that Conditional Use Permit No. 88000 is exempt
:� from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as
amended.
` b. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 88000, subject to
� stated conditions and requirements.
5. Tentative Parcel Map--Case No. 88001
3584 Century Boulevard (St. Francis Medical Ctr.)
Comments•
The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Parcel
� Map to combine several lots in the CB-1 (Controlled
Business) zone and the R-3 (MUltiple-Family Residential)
zone.
� Recommended Action:
� Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
� Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2177: •
�
�
= a. Finding that Tentative Parcel Map No. 19583, Case
No. 88001 will not have a significant effect on
� the environment, and certify the Negative
Declaration as adequate.
,; b. Approving Tentative Parcel Map, Case No. 88001,
subject to stated conditions and requirements,
V10:Agenda .
�
. 2
�
�
x:�
�
�" ,
�
a
; 5a. Zone Chan e Case No. 88001
�.
3584 Century Boulevard St. Francis Medical Ctr.)
� Comments•
' The applicant is requesting a zone ohange from CB-1
; (Controlled Business) to Hospital-Medical-Dental (HMD) in
order to open a dormitory for the Sisters of Charity.
� Recommended Action: �
• Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
�•
, Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2176:
�! a. Findinq that Zone Change, Case No. 88001, could not
have a significant effect on the environment; and
certify the Negative Declaration as adequate.
, b. Approving Resolution No. 2176 recommending City Council
approval of Zone Change Case No. 88001.
, 6. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88003
3340 Sanborn Avenue (Effie Porth)
; Comments•
�
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to
allow a headstart program in an existing church facility in
the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2180:
a. Finding that Conditional Use Permit No. 88003 is exempt
from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as
amended. �
" b. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 88003, subject to
stated conditions and requirements.
�
' 7. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 88004
� 11555 Wright Road (Effie Porth)
Comments•
�
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to
allow a headstart program in Ham Park, located in the
Manufacturing (M) zone.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planninq Commission adopt Resolution No. 2181:
a. Finding that Conditional Use Permit No. 88004 is exempt
from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as
amended.
b. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 88004, subject to
s
stated conditions and requirements.
�
�
V10:Agenda
�
3
z�
8. Request for Tentative Parcel Map Extension--Case No. 88010
11561 Virginia Avenue (Billy Hisey)
Comments:
The applicant is requesting that Tentative Parcel Map No.
17149 be,extended an additional six months.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2178:
a. Finding that an extension of Tentative Parcel Map No.
17149 will not have a significant effect on the
environment.
b. Approving a six-month extension of Tentative Parcel Map
No. 17149 to August 13, 1988.
9. Zoning Ordinance Amendment -- Case No. 88006
(Density Bonus)
Commments•
Proposed amendment to establish regulations to allow density
bonuses of twenty-five (258) percent above the basic density
in multiple-family residential zones, in exchange for
superior and unique developments. The proposed Ordinance
modifies, the existing density bonus/incentives in the
Lynwood Zoning Ordinance.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2171:
a. Finding that the proposed amendment is exempt from the
provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended.
b. Recommending that the City Council approve the findings
in Resolution No. 2171, waive reading and introduce the
proposed ordinance.
10. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87108
12534 Atlantic Avenue (ROd Nourafshan)
Comments:
This item involves Conditional Use Permit approval to
operate an automobile repair center at 1�534 Atlantic
Avenue. However, the appplicant has determined that the
proposal is not economically feasible and has withdrawn his
application.
Recommended Action:
Staff recommends that this item be withdrawn from the
Planning Commission agenda.
I V10:Agenda
I
I
�
4
�
� , :.`
3`
;
�
z
.
�
s 11. Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 88002
� 11170 Long Beach Boulevard (McDonald Corp.)
� .
� Comments:
This is an application for Tentative Parcel Map approval in
� order to merge several lots into one parcel.
Recommended Action:
� Staff recommends that this matter be continued to the next
� regular meeting of the Planning Commission on April 12,
�
1988.
�
>
�
z
; REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS
Policy with respect to the need for a second meeting of the
Planning Commission each month.
�
s
STAFF COMMENTS
COMMISSION ORALS
PUBLIC ORALS
(Information items only)
=a ADJOURNMENT
�
Adjourn to the next reqular meeting of the Planning
Commission on April 12, 1988, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall
Council Chambers, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California.
>;
w
:�
�
V10:Agenda
' S
:
r:
1 (\ r �j�� I' i- i; i `I � I
^ 1 4 �_ !': `.%:� i I 1 i_.: t 1 � ti V.�i�..�q
l�f"1�6- ''" i 87097 __..
JL_ I�'�'�. _
DATE: March 8, 1988
T0: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Dept.
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 87097
Applicant: Teresita Ualdez
The applicant is requesting conditional use permit approval in
order to open a convalescent hospital at 4271 Carlin Avenue,
Lynwood, California.
This matter was continued from the January 12, and February 9,
1988 meeting of the Planning Commission, in order that the
applicant would be able to submit certain documents to the
Commission with respect to the administration of the facility.
- The Planning Commission directed the City Attorney to
investigate the facility and report on the terms and conditions
of probation imposed on the property owner by the court.
Ms. Valdez is requesting another continuance to the April 12, �
1988 meeting of the Planning Commission, because she has been
unable to obtain the required documents.
Recommended Action:
Staff requests that the Planning Commission continue this matter
to its April 12, 1988 meeting.
I
I
Disk 25:Valdezlt
I
I
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF LYNWOOD� CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY� FEBRUARY 9� 1988
OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Call to Order
A regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of
Lynwood was called to order by Chairperson Kanka on the
above-captioned date at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of
the Lynwood City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood,
,California, 90262.
B. Pledge of Allegiance
Commissioner pove led the Pledge of Allegiance.
C. Roll Call of Commissioners
Chairperson Kanka requested the roll call, and Vicente Mas
complied.
Present: Commissioner Lena Cole-Dennis
Commissioner ponald Dove
Commissioner Lucille Kanka
Commissioner Alberto Montoya Penalber
Commissioner Roy Pryor
Commissioner David J. Willis, Jr.
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner
Dove, to grant excused absence for Commissioner Raymond.
MOTION carried unanimously.
Also present: Douglas Barnes, General Counsel
Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
Dorethea Tilford
Acting Senior Planner
John Claxton
Planning Division Clerk
James Devore, Associate Civil Engineer
Public Works/Engineering Division
Joy Valentine, Minutes Clerk
Approximately twenty-six people were in the audience.
D. Approval of Minutes
Mr. Mas stated that, per the Brown Act, the agenda had been
duly posted.
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner
Dove, to approve and accept the minutes of January 12, 1988,
as presented to the Commission.
DISK 25:MINUTES
1
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Kanka,
Penalber, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Raymond
ABSTAIN: None
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING
1. Conditional Use.Permit No. 87097
4271 Carlin Avenue (Teresita Valdez)
Applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to operate a convalescent hospital to provide
geriatric, primarily non-ambulatory 24-hour care at 4271
Carlin Avenue. A similar operation at the same site was
ordered closed.
Mr. Barnes stated that the condition that the property
cannot be transferred to another owner without City
approval, as requested by the Commission at their January
12, 1988, meeting, cannot legally be required.
Applicant has requested, in writing, a continuance of the
Public Hearing to the next regulary scheduled meeting of
the Planning Commission on March 8, 1988, because she
needs more time to assemble the required documentation
required by the Commission.
The MOTION was made by Commissioner Penalber, and
SECONDED by Commissioner Pryor, to continue Conditional
Use Permit Case No. 87097 to their March 8, 1988,
meeting, as requested by applicant Teresita Valdez.
The MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Kanke,
Penalber, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Raymond
ABSTAIN: None
2. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87095
3156 Euclid Avenue (RObert Rogers)
Applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to operate a
group residential facility located at 3156 Euclid Avenue
in the R-3 (MUltiple Family ResidentialJ zone.
Chairperson Kanka asked Robert Rogers to come forward,
and, although he was in the audience, he sent a
representative, Phil Cookas, 3156 Euclid Avenue, who
stated Mr. Rogers' acceptance of all 31 conditions.
Mr. Cookes stated that Teen Challenge is an outstanding
orgainization for the treatment of both men and women who
are involved in drug and/or alcohol abuse and/or gang
violence. This facility is scheduled to house 10 to 15
men on a rehabilitiation schedule of approximately 60
days.
�
I
2 I
The site will provide 24-hour housing, which includes
meals and sleeping accomodations, plus space for
recreational activity. Three professional staff inembers
will live onsite. Other counselors will be provided as
needed.
Commissioner Willis stated that he found the area to be
appalling, plus a multitude of little children live in
the area and he wanted assurance they would be safe. Mr.
Cookes replied the area had been chosen because there
were neighborhood children living in the area who might
be helped by the program, plus so-called bad areas are,
again, where youth in need of help might congregate. He
added that two separate neighborhood gangs had offered to
help repair the property. Teen Challenge will work with
the neighborhood schools, neighborhood youth will be
invited to "YOUth Recreation Nights" and everything
possible will be done to improve the neighborhood. Mr.
Cookes added that Teen Challenge has been doing this sort
of thing for 25 years in the Los Angeles area, and has an
excellent record of 86� cure rate with both heroin and
alcofiol. Aowever, the person involved must want to
change and must abide by the rules established by Teen
Challenge.
Commissioner pove asked what the dismissal process is
when the person refuses to accept the rules. Mr. Cookes
replied that the person will be taken to the bus station.
Commissioner Penalber asked about gang problems. Mr.
Cookes replied that was one of the reasons this
particular area was chosen, because it is one of the
worst gang areas. Already progress has been made, he
noted, since two different gangs have offered to paint
the graffitied house now in escrow. He stated there will
be fifteen people living in the 4,000 square foot of
housing, three staff inembers and twelve young people.
Commissioner Pryor asked if the counselors receive any
special training and Mr. Cookes replied in the
affirmative. Each counselor receives a minimum of two
years training, and Teen Challenge headquarters is
located in South Gate, where this training is on-going.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis expressed her approval of Teen
Challenge, stating that most of the young people are
rehabilitated and sent home.
Mr. Cookes stated that, unlike other rehabilitation
programs, Teen Challenge is free to the recipient, and
operates on private donations from local businesses and
churches. The counselors will assist those qualified to
receive food stamps, and that's all the governmental j
assistance received.
Chairman Kanka opened the Public Hearing and asked if
anyone wished to speak in favor of the proposed I
Conditional Use Permit. �
Robert Frye, 12501 Alpine Avenue, Lynwood, stated his I
approval. He stated he represented church members in the I
audience who expect the presence of Teen Challenge to
improve the quality of their neighborhood.
�
Richard Foster, 24723 Via E1 Monte, Torrance, stated he �
is the owner of several units and noted a 100$ i
improvement as for as graffiti, drug use, etc., one Teen I
Challenge was established in his neighborhood. �
DISK 25:MINUTES
I
3 �
James Galipeau, 4276 E. Imperial Highway, Lynwood, Deputy
Probation Officer for the County of Los Angeles, stated
Teen Challenge has always accepted destitute juveniles
and he would be proud to have them as neighbors.
June Galipeau, 4276 E. Imperial Highway, Lynwood, also a
Deputy Probation Officer for the County of Los Angeles,
stated her agreement with her husband and her approval of
Teen Challenge.
Ray Chavira, 11434 Plum Street, Lynwood, stated, has a
former high school teacher, his complete approval of Teen
Challenge as an inexpensive program.
Claudia Shuman, 3201 Euclid Avenue, stated her 20-year
old son had been shot in a gang-related incident because
he was on the wrong street. As a parent, she wants Teen
Challenge in Lynwood and is grateful they want to come
here and help.
Chairperson Kanka asked if anyone wanted to speak against
the proposed Conditional Use Permit. Since no one
replied, she closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Penalber voiced his approval of Teen
Challenge and stated he has visited the house were Teen
Challenge is to be located.
Applause was heard from the audience.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis voiced her approval and added
that the need has been here in Lynwood for some time.
MOTION was made by Commissioner pove, and SECONDED by
Commisioner COle-Dennis, to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2160 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE
OPERATION OF A"TEEN CHALLENGE" RESIDENTIAL FACILITY ON
LOT 15, TRACT N0. 14551, 3156 EUCLID AVENUE� LYNWOOD�
CALIFORNIA� IN THE R-3 (MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE
and find that Conditional Use Permit No. 87095 will not
have a significant effect on the environment and is
exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines,
as amended.
The motion passes by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Kanka,
Penalber, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Raymond I
�
ABSTAIN: None I
More applause was heard from the audience.
Chairperson Kanka wished the applicant Godspeed and much
luck.
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS
3. Tentative Parcel Map - Case No. 87103
Alameda & Butler Avenues (Davis Developments)
�
DISK 2S:MINUTES '
i
�
I
. �
4 �
I
I
I
Applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Parcel
Map to subdivide a 17-acre parcel for the proposed
development into three (3) parcels.
Dorethea Tilford stated that the site is currently vacant
with stockpiles of used tires in various locations within
the parcel. The site is surrounded on three sides by
manufacturing, on the other by residential. Approval was
granted by Site Plan Review Committee on January 19,
1988. The proposed land use is consistent with the
existing zoning designation of Manufacturing and with the
General Plan designation of Zndustrial zone. A Negative
Declaration will be prepared for the development.
Chairperson Kanka opened the Public Hearing and asked for
a r.epresentative of Davis Development. Mr. Allan
Tutland, 51 Woodley, City of Irvine, stated that all
conditions are acceptable and requested approval of the
Tentative Parcel Map. He added that their civil engineer
was present if there were any questions.
There being no one else in the audience wishing to speak
either for or against, Chairperson Kanka closed , the
Public Hearing.
The Commissioners had no questions or comments, and
Chairperson Kanka asked for a motion.
MOTION made by Commissioner pove, SECONDED by
Commissioner Penalber to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2166 - A
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CZTY OF
LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 19054 TO
SUBDIVIDE A 17-ACRE PARCEL INTO 3 LOTS IN THE "M" ZONING
DISTRICT, LOCATED AT ALAMEDA STREET AND BUTLER AVENUE,
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA and find that Tentative Parcel Map
No. 19054, Case No. 87103, will not have a significant
effect on the environment.
The MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Kanka,
Penalber, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Raymond
ABSTAIN: None
3a. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87103
Alameda and Butler Avenues (Davis Developments)
Applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to construct
a 304,200 square foot warehouse and associated parking at
the northeatst corner of Alameda and Butler Avenues, in
the Manufacturing (M) zone.
The site is currently vacant with stockpiles of used
tires in various locations of the parcel. The site is �
surrounded on three sides by Manufacturing and on the
other side by Residential. Proposed development is
compatible with the industrial nature of the area.
Chairperson Kanka opened the Public Hearing and asked for
a representative of Davis Development. Mr. Allan
Tuitland, 51 Woodley, CIty of Irvine, stated that all i
conditions are acceptable. He stated that they are
extremely excited because this should be good for the
City and profitable for them.
DISK 25:MINUTES I
5
Commissioner Cole-Dennis asked what would be stored in
the warehouse, and Mr. Tutland stated that such things as
nuts and bolts, maybe paper, would probably be stored
there. He stated the building might be bondable, then it
could be a customs clearing house, or it could be turned
into 2 separate units. He stated that hazardous
materials would not be stored there, the banks that loan
him money will not deal in hazardous materials or toxic
wastes. He further stated that they have experience in
building in the Cities of Montebello, Santa Fe Springs,
and Cucamonga.
Mr. Mas stated that the proposed occupants will have to
apply for a Certificate of Occupancy, plus business
licenses, and these questions will be answered then.
Chairperson Kanka asked if anyone wanted to speak for the
Conditional Use Permit. There being no one, she asked if
anyone wanted to speak against.
Mr. Robert Frye, 12501 Alpine, Lynwood, rose to ask a
question, not necessarily against. He wanted to know if
this site could turn into a storage area like the one on
Wright Road near the Freeway.
Mr. Mas replied that the occupants will have to abide by
the Municipal Code, now and in the future.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairperson
Kanka closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION made by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by
Commissioner Penalber, to find that Conditional Use
Permit Case No. 87103 will not have a significant effect
on the environment and approve Conditional Use Permit No.
87103, subject to the stated conditions and requirements.
The motion was passed by the followinq vote:
AYES: Commissinoers Cole-Dennis, Dove, Kanka,
Penalber, Pryor, Willis
' NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Raymond
ABSTAIN: None
4. Modification of Conditional Use Permit No. 86093
Case No. 87105 - 11132-34 Long Beach Boulevard i
Applicant: Richard Engle, 14015 Roblar Road, Sherman
Oaks, California 91423
Applicant requests approval of a Modification to '
Conditional Use Permit No. 86093, to allow Eddie Jr.'s
Mini-market to sell beer and wine at shopping center.
Permit was granted to another vendor for the proposed use
last year, but was not utilized at that time.
The original permit was issued to 7-Eleven (SOUthland �
Corporation); said permit would now be issued to Eddie �
Jr.'s Mini-market. Approval of the Site Plan Review �
Committee was qranted on January 19, 1988. Physical
' location of the store has been changed from the most j
northerly portion of the site (now E1 Pollo Loco) to the �
� in-line stores, closer to Long Beach Boulevard. New �
location is approximately 350 feet from B&C Liquor store j
located on Zmperial Highway, west of Long Beach
Boulevard. �
i
i
DISK 25:MINUTES �
(
i
6 I
I
I
. I
Chairperson Kanka opened the Public Hearing and asked if
Mr. Engle wished to speak.
Richard Engle, 14015 Roblar Road, Sherman Oaks,
California, 91423, rose to state his acceptance of all
conditions and that he is only asking approval to move
the alcoholic beverage licenses from one location to
another within the site. He considers Eddie Jr.'s Mini-
market to be an excellent draw for the center because
Eddie Snow has sixteen other stores that are kept clean.
This store, in his opinion, will not negatively impact
the community and he, personally, will continue to
maintain the high standards he has maintained up to this
time in the mall.
Commissioner pove asked what percentage of the total
sales will be in beer and wine. Mr. Engle replied that
it is approximately 158.
Commissioner Willis stated that there are already social
problems in the area, such as beggars and other anti-
sociable behavior, and asked Mr. Engle how he plans to
deal with these problems.
Mr. Engle replied that, if necessary, he will hire
security guards to eliminate loitering and undesirable
behavior. Such behavior will negatively impact on the
presence of the tenants he has now.
Commissioner Penalber wanted to know if games will be
available.
Mr. Engle repled that one of the conditions of the
original Conditional Use Permit was that no video games
and/or pay phones be on the premises.
Commissioner Penalber stated that a liquor store, then a
dairy, then another liquor store and motels are already
in existence.
Mr. Engle stated that he will call the police if there i
are problems, and if that doesn't improve the situation, �
he will hire security guards. �
i
Commissioner Cole-Dennis stated she has visited one of
Eddie's Liquor stores in Lynwood and that it wan't clean
or maintained very well.
Mr. Engle stated that Eddie now owns 23 stores in I
California, 16 in this area, and that Eddie maintains
control over his people. Mr. Engle visited one in
Lakewood and it was fine. i
Commissioner Penalber said there was one near Compton i
College and it was not well-maintained at all.
Commissioner pove stated that the better location was the I
one originally intended for the Conditional Use Permit,
that location was in the center of the mall and easier i
for surveillance by enforcement officers.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis agreed that Eddie's in Lakewood �
is well-maintained, but Lakewood has a different Planning �
Commission. i
�
DISK 25:MINUTES �
�
7 �
There being no more comments from the Commission or Mr.
Enqle, Chairperson Kanka asked if anyone in the audience
wished to speak for the COnditional Use Permit. There
being no one, she asked if anyone wished to speak against
it.
Ray Chavira, 11434 Plum Street, Lynwood, wanted to know
if there wasn't an expiration date, since this
Conditional Use Permit was issued in September of 1986.
Mr. Barnes said it should last until revoked.
Mr. Chavira stated there should be a lapse time added
when alcohol is involved. Also, he was of the opinion it
whoudl be invalid since a change of address is involved.
Mr. Barnes stated the original Conditional Use Permit had
been granted to the parcel, not a particular address.
However, if the original locatin is changed, a
modification must be acquired.
Mr. Chavira stated the proposed site is in a high crime
area, also, there are already too many liquor stores. He
said that a member of the Sheriff's Department should
have attended the Planning Commission meeting.
Chairperson Kanka asked Mr. Chavera how he feels about
the moving of the store and the change of the name of the
store where the Conditional Use Permit will be applied.
Mr. Chavira replied that he is against the sale of
dangerous legal drugs such as alcohol anywhere within the
City.
Jim Galipeau, 4176 E. Imperial Highway, Lynwood, objected
to permitting the Conditional Use Permit to be used in
the new location because of the poor visibility.
Surveill would have been easy in the previous location,
now it will be at the back of the "L" and very convenient
for prostitutes to get both food and beer. In his
opinion, it will be very easy for thieves to steal beer
and wine during the four hours it is illegal to sell it.
George Lucas, 12404 Muriel, Lynwood, stated he
represented approximately ten people in the audience. He
was worried that Mr. Engle might sell out and the new
owner might not use a security guard. Mr. Frye said he
is acquantied with Eddie Snow and agrees with
Commissioner Cole-Dennis that the store near Alpha Beta
is in bad conditin. Also, Mr. Frye felt that the type of
patron attracted by the sale of liquor would chase out
the cash customers now shopping at E1 Pollo Loco and and
McDOnald's, probably causing the closure of both of them.
The proposed new location is too close to B&C Liquor, he
stated. The Town Center Mall will be adversely affected,
in his opinion.
Chairperson Kanka stated the Conditional Use Permit had �
already been granted, this hearing was only to consider
the new location and new name.
Charles Glenn, 3533 Carlin, Lynwood, stated there have
already been too many liquor licenses granted in the
City, and the public safety will be in danger because the
new location is more difficult for surveillance by
enforcement officers. The Code Enforcement in Lynwood is 1
I
DISK 25:MINUTES I
�
I
8
not as good as in Lakewood, he said. Both E1 Pollo Loco
and McDOnald's are family oriented, and families will not
go where the clients are of the type that will be
attracted by the sale of liquor. Also, in his opinion,
Eddie Jr.'s liquor stores are not always clean. He is
definitely opposed to the granting of a modification.
Cal McCrackin, 3156 Euclid, Lynwood, is totally opposed.
He would be happier if there were no liquor stores
anywhere in the world.
There being no one else wishing to speak for or against,
Chairperson Kanka closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Penalber wanted to know the hours of
operation, and Mr. Engle stated that no restirctions had
been placed, by state law the sale of liquor would be
illegal from 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m.
Mr. Mas stated no restrictions had been imposed, and Mr.
Engle replied that he was not opposed to reasonable time
restrictions.
Mr. Barnes stated the Conditional Use Permit was not tied
to the address, but to the parcel of land, and the
original Conditional Use Permit could be modified as the
Commission desires. He further stated that the State of
California regulates alcohol sale and the law is being
pressed in Lynwood. The Planning Commission of Lynwood
is concerned with zoning, and the Alcoholic Beverage
Control is concerned with the regulation of liquor, and
we may be stepping into their territory.
Mr. Mas said a six-month limit could be imposed by the
Commission.
Mr. Barnes states that a six-month to a year review could
be required, the City would then hold a Public Hearing
and notify the neighbors of the proposed Public Hearing.
Chairperson Kanka itemized the requirements to be made:
time limit from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on the sale of
beer and wine; the windows not be blocked from easy
visibility inside; a Public Hearing to be held in 12
months, for which the applicant must pay; plus the 12
conditions already required.
Mr. Engle asked if any more conditions could be imposed
at the Public Hearing and Mr. Mas replied in the
negative, only the present conditions will be considered.
MOTION made by Commissioner pove, SECONDED by
Commissioner Penalber, to approve RESOLUTION N0. 2170, A
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD APPROVING A MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT N0. 86093 TO ALLOW A CONVENIENCE MARKET WITH SALES
OF ALCHOLIC BEVERAGES (BEER AND WINE) AT 11118 LONG BEACH
BOULVARD� LYNWOOD, IN THE C-2A (MEDIUM COMMERCIAL) ZONE
SUBJECT TO ALL AFOREMENTIONED CONDITZONS.
The motion.carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Kanka, Penalber, Pryor
NOES: Commissioner Cole-Dennis
ABSENT: Commissinoer Raymond
i
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Willis �
I
DISK 25:MINUTES �
I
9 I
�
Mr. Ray Chavira stated his intention to contact staff,
pay the fees and appeal this decision of the Planning
Commission to the City Council.
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS
1. Appeal of Conditions for C U P. Approval - Case No. 87072
On January 2, 1988, the Planning Commission approved
Conditional Use Permit Case No. 87072 allowing for the
development of eight units. Applicant, according to City
policy, was required to build a block wall/fence around the
perimeter of the property. City has received a letter from
applicant requesting that this condition be waived and he be
allowed to build a wood fence, because the cost of the block
wall/fence would constitute a financial hardship.
Mr. Bill Murdock, 767 Prometory, Newport Beach, representing
the applicant, Mr. Mulhearn, stated that redwood fencing
doesn't absorb graffiti and withstands earthquakes better
than a block wall. He contended the cost of a block wall is
2-1/2 times greater than the wood fence.
Mr. Mas stated rents are usually determined by whatever the
market will bear.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis stated a redwood fence would fall if
children were to climb on it. Both Commissioner Pryor and
Penalber stated preference for block wall fencing, which, if
constructed properly, would not fall after earthquakes of
the magnitude generally experienced in this area.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis stated Commission should uphold its
earlier decision. The Commission unanimously agreed to uphold
its decision that the applicant would have to build a block
wall around the perimeter of the site.
2. There was a short discussion about density bonus/incentives
for multiple family residential developments. This matter
will be presented in greater detail at the next regular meet-
ing of the Planning Commission on April 12, 1988.
Mr. Mas pointed out that more restrictions will require that the I
city have the means to enforce the regulations. Commissioner ;
Dove said there was a real need to review present policy. i
STAFF COMMENTS I
I
Commissioner Cole-Dennis complimented the Minutes Clerk (Joy I
Valentine) on the great minutes that were prepared. �
Commissioner Pryor discussed the start and stop divider on I
Atlantic Avenue. Mr. Mas was unable to answer the questions but
will find out. �
Commissioner Penalber asked if inedian barriers save money on
liability insurance for the City and Mr. Mas replied that the �
barriers can stop head-on collissions, but there have been no
studies on how they affect insurance. i
Commissioner Penalber further asked how the recruiting for Code �
Enforcement Officers was proceeding and Mr. Mas replied that one ;
is working and another will be working for the City soon, he has i
already given notice at his present employment.
DISK 25:MINUTES I
I
�
10 �
PUBLIC ORALS
Ray Chavira, 11434 Plum Street, Lynwood, stated his approval of
the upcoming Public Hearing on alcohol. He wants Code
Enforcement to do something about the flea market on Montgomery
Ward's corner.
Mr. Chavira said he went to the Circle K, which is open 24 hours,
and noticed that single cans of beer are being sold. Also, he
was able to purchase wine during the time when wine was not sup-
posed to be sold.
Robert Frye, 12501 ALpine, Lynwood, stated that the ABC put a
restriction reqarding the sale of alcoholic beverages on
Thrifty's Drug store. He thanked Commissioner Cole-Dennis for
being on the right track as concerns Eddie Jr.'s Liquor store.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Planning
Commission, the MOTION was made by Commissioner pove and SECONDED
by Commissioner Penalber to adjourn to the next regularly
scheduled meeting of the Planninq Commission on March 8, 1988, at
7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of Lynwood City Hall.
The motion carried and the meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m.
APPROVED AS WRITTEN this 8th day of March, 1988.
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
Lynwood Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Vicente L. Mas, Director �
Community Development Dept. �
I
I
I
I
I
DISK 25:MINUTES
11
�
I
: __
t1ni�r'•.,� �`. ? i �. .�'!i �'u��._ � �
87104
G����r i,;;-
DATE: March 8, 1988 J�. I','v.
T0: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 87104
Applicant: Antonio Corn
3547 Mulford Avenue
Lynwood, CA. 90262
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to build two (2)
two bedroom units at 3547 Mulford Avenue, in the R-3
(MUltiple Family Residential Zone).
FACTS
1. Source of Authoritv
Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that a
Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to build and/or relocate
any dwelling unit in the R-3 zone. �
2. Property Location
The subject property consists of a single lot between California l
Avenue and Birch Street (See attached Location Map). I
3. Property Size
The subject is a rectangular shaped lot that is fifty (50') wide and I
one hundred and eighty (180') feet deep; the total area is �
approximately 9,000 square feet. I
4. Existing Land Use
The property is presently occupied by a 1940 single family home. I
The surrounding land uses are as follows: �
North - Single Family Homes East - Multi-family Apartments �
Multi-family Apartments j
(
South - Single Family Homes West - Single Family Homes �
5. Land Use Descri tion I
The General Plan designation for the subject property is Multi-
Family Residential, and the zoning classification is R-3 (Multi- j
Family Residential). The surrounding land uses are as follows: I
General Plan Zoning �
North - Multi-Family Residential North - R-3 I
South - Multi-Family Residential South - R-3
�
East - Multi-Family Residential East - R-3 �
� I
1
West - Multi-Family Residential West - R-3 �
Disk 25:87104CUP j
I
f
f
i
I
�
s
i` ` �
I,
f:
6. Project Characteristics:
R ' The applicant proposes to build a duplex with a four-car garage
behind an existing single-family dwelling. The front of the project
�i
will be on Mulford Avenue.
`- A six (6') foot block wall will be built on the perimeter of the
lot, except in the front yard set back, in which the maximum height
� is four (4') feet.
� � The total height of the development will not exceed thirty-five
` (35') feet.
YV
�X; Site Plan Review
�;
- At its regular meeting on February 18, 1988, the Site Plan Review
Committee approved the proposed project, subject to the conditions
and requirements stated in the attached Resolution.
Zoning Enforcement History
None of record.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
1. Consistency with the General Plan
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning
�= designation (R-3) and consistent with the General Plan designation
..
(Multiple Family Residential).
�-; Site Suitability
2. The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
proposed development relative to density, structures, parking,
walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features
- required by the Zoning Ordinance.
Mulford Avenue is not a major arterial; it is substandard in width
and residents and visitors can only park on one side of the street.
3. Compatibility I
"' The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of low and �
� medium density residential developments; therefore, the project
will be compatible with the developments in the area.
4. Compliance with Development Standards
The proposal meets the development standards required by the Zoning I
Ordinance with respect to front, side, and rear yard setbacks;
distance between structures; lot coverage; builidng height; and I
density.
,`< �
5. Conditions of Approval �
- The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions recommended
by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a negative effect �
on the values of the surrounding properties or interfere with or
endanger the public health, safety or welfare. i
I
�
i
I
,'' !
DISK 25:87104CUP �
�
�
�
�
'n
�
'
r �
1
i
i
i
I
6. Benefits to Community
The proposed development will aid in aesthetically upgrading the
neighborhood and will act as a catalyst in fostering other quality
developments. Furthermore, the development will add favorably to
� the City's housing stock and will provide additional affordably-
I , priced housing in furtherance of the policies of the Housing Element
of the General Plan.
7. Environmental Assessment
This development is categorically exempt from the provisions of the
State CEQA Guidelines, as amended (Section 15303, Class 3).
RECOMMENDATION:
I
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2167:
1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 87104, is
exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as
amended.
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 87104, subject to the
stated conditions and requirements.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
3. Resolution No. 2167
�
i
�
I
i
�
i
� I
�
'
�
I
I DISK 25:87104CUP I
�
i
I
�
�
, ;
i
I
i
i
I
I
,
i
87104CUP
RESOLUTION N0. 2167
i A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT N0. 87104 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
r- DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL DWELLING WITH AN ATTACHED
" FOUR-CAR GARAGE AND THE DEMOLITION OF AN
" EXISITNG GARAGE AT 3547 MULFORD AVENUE�
��:� LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, IN THE R-3 (MULTI-FAMILY
f's RESIDENTIAL) ZONE.
�.� .
F WHEREAS the L nwood Plannin Commission
, y g , pursuant to law,
conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered all pertinent
testimony offered at the public hearing; and
.�
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for any
development in the R-3 (MUlti-Family Residential) zone.
Section 1. The Planning Commissin hereby finds and determines
as follows:
-� .
"; A. . The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape
to accommodate the structures, parking, walls,
landscaping, driveways and other development features
required by the Official Zoning Ordinance.
B. The structures, as proposed, or modified, subject to
conditions, will not have a negative effect on the values
of surrounding properties or interfere with or endanger
the public health, safety, or welfare.
C. The site will be developed pursuant to the surrent zoning
regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the
;;: Site Plan Review Committee.
D. The proposed development will aid inaesthetically I
upgrading the surrounding area. I
E. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not �
adversely affect the General Plan. I
� Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood I
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby
approves Conditional Use Permit No. 87104, provided the following
conditions are observed and complied with at all times:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1
1. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable '
regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform
Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code.
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site
or structures thereon, shall be first reported to the
Community Development Department, Planning Division, for �
review of said Conditional Use Permit.
3. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other
City Departments.
DISK 25:87104RE5 I
I
I
�
1
4. The applicant shall sign a Statement of Acceptance stating
that he/she has read, understands, and agrees to all
conditions of this resolution within fifteen (15) days
from the date of adoption of said resolution by the
Planning Commission.
PLANNING DIVISION
• 5. A minimum of twenty-five (258) percent of the lot area
shall be landscaped.
6. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in
accordance with a detailed plan to be submitted and
approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of any
building permits.
7. A minimum of two two-car garages shall be provided and
that th interior space of all outdoor lighting shall be
directed away from adjacent streefs and properties.
8. A six (6') foot high block wall shall be installed along
the perimeter of the property, except within the twenty
(20') foot frontyard setback. In this frontage, the
wall shall not exceed a height of four (4') foot measured
from top of curb.
9. No side yard shall be less than five (5') feet.
10. Final building elevations, including materials of
construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the
Building Official prior to issuance of any building
permits.
11. Before any building permits shall be issued, the developer
shall pay $1.50 per square foot for residential buildings
to the Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to
Government Code Section 53080.
12. All driveway and parking areas shall be paved.
13. Construction shall be completed within six (6) months from
date of issuance of building permits.
14. Prior to the installation or construction of any masonry
wall, the property owner shall obtain a permit for and
submit the following information to the Planning Division:
a. Simple plot plan showing the location of the masonry I
wall in relation to property lines, lengths, proposed I
materials, and openings or gates to provide access for
vehicles and pedestrians. I
b. For masonary walls (as defined in subsection 25-2.1)
a building permit shall be applied for in addition to j
the plot plan described above. All masonry walls of I
any height shall need the requirements for masonry �
construction as defined in Chapter 24 of the Unified ,
Building Code. A fee based on the valuation of the
proposed construction shall be paid to the Building `
Department. �
I
c. All masonry walls shall be required to maintain �
adequate pedestrian access for the purpose of safety �
and convenience. A thirty-six (36) inch or three (3) �
foot clear gate or opening shall be provided to all i
enclosures for pedestrian and wheelchair access.
Pedestrian and vehicular access shall be provided
separately.
DISK 25:87104RES �
�
�
2 ,
i
; . .
�
!
� d. All Masonry walls shall be required to be installed
� with a finished, aesthetically pleasing side facing
; out toward adjacent properties or the public riqht-of-
� way.
� e. This Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become
void ninety (90) days after the use permitted has been
abandoned or has ceased to be actively exercised.
15. The eaves of the residential structures must project at
least two and one-half (2-1/2) feet on at least two sides
of the buildings.
16. The roof shall be constructed with a non-reflective
material including shingles, woodshake, asphalt composite,
crushed rock and other similar roofing material that is
not reflective, glossy, or polished and/or roll form type
metal roofing.
- 17. Residential structures shall have an exterior siding of
brick, stucco, wood, metal, concrete, or other similar
material other than the reflective, glossy, polished
and/or roll-formed type metal siding. This standard can
be modified by the procedure described in paragraph b.15.
below.
, 18. Since the garage is closer than five (5) feet to an
interior sideyard lot line, a one-hour fire wall is
, required. The wall facing the lot line shall not have any
exterior opening. �
� 19. The garages attached and detached shall be limited to a
maximum of fifteen (15) feet in height.
20. The detached garage must maintain a minimum of a six (6')
foot separation from the main structure.
21. All main structures must maintain a ten (10') foot
separation.
' �
I
FIRE DEPARTMENT +
22. If security bars are placed on bedroom windows, at least I
one window for each bedroom shall have quick release �
mechanisms that does not require a key or any special I
knowledge. U.B.C. Section 1204.
23. Provide smoke detectors, (U.L, and State Fire Marshal i
approved type.)
I
24. Provide approved 4" dry fire line, (Obtain speccific '
requirements from Fire Department).
I
25. Post No Parking signs in driveway to prevent obstructing. I
26. One (1) fire wall between house and garage.
I
I
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT �
I
�
27. Dedicate a five feet (5') wide strip of property along �
Mulford Avenue. ;
28. Submit a drainage plan. �
Disk 25:87104Res ;
I
3 �
�
I
29. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk along Mulford.
30. Construct 24' wide gutter and asphalt pavement along
property frontage.
31. Reconstruct damaged and substandard drive approach(es),
per City standards.
32. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be
connected separately. Construct laterals as necessary.
33. Install one (1) 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood
standards.
34. Regarde parkway and landscape with grass.
35. Underground all utilities.
36. Underground existing utilities if any modifications are
proposed for the electrical service.
37. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for
all off-site improvements.
38. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or
fire protection lines shall be installed by the
developer. The work shall be performed by a licensed
contractor hired by the developer. The contractor must
obtain a permit from the Public Works/Engineering
Division prior ro performing any work.
Section 3. The Community Development Department has �
determined that the proposed project is categorically exempt from
the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended.
Section 4. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered to
the applicant.
i
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of March, 1988, by members �
of the Planning Commission voting as follows: I
AYES: I
NOES:
�
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
i
I
I
Vicente L. Mas, Director I
Community Development Dept. General Counsel �
�
DISK 25:87104RES �
(
1
I
4
----, .
('; ;r�q�t�l,; i_,.,�n '�.
, . .. < .._ ( "': i.,"ri , � ��� 'i :'� ��t
�� , nr- r; 87106CUP
t;: �:. i`; J, ----------�.
DATE: March 8, 1988
T0: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 87106
Applicant: Eric Osorio
PROPOSAL•
,The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to operate
a business to repair and install automobile alarms at 5130
Imperial Highway, in the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) zone.
FACTS:
1. Source of Authority.
Section 25-16.15 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that
a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to operate any
business pertaining to automobile uses.
2. Property Location.
The subject property consists of a single lot on the south
side of Imperial Highway between Atlantic Avenue and Wright
Road (See attached location map). I
3. Property Size.
i
The subject property is approximately 9,900 square feet.
4. Existing Land Use.
There is an existing building on the site. The surrounding
land uses are as follows:
North - Commercial East - Commercial
South - Commercial/Residential West - Multi-Family
5. Land Use Descriotion. �
The General Plan designation for the subject property is I
Commercial, and the zoning classification is C-3 (Heavy �
Commercial). The surrounding land uses are as follows: (
�
I
I
I
DISK D-9:87106CUP I
�
�
�
I
- I
.Jr�
'% General Plan: Zoning:
r North - Commercial North - C-3
South - Commercial/Residential South - C-3/Res.
�> East - Commercial East - C-3
West - Commercial West - C-3
<
6. Project Characteristics
° The applicant proposes to,repair and install alarms in auto-
mobiles. No body work or painting is permitted. There is
sufficient parking for the proposed use.
7. Site Plan Review !
At its regular meeting on February 18, 1988, the Site Plan I
, Review Committee approved the proposed project, subject to �
the conditions and requirements stated in the attached i
Resolution. �
I
8. Zoning Enforcement Historv �
None of record.
.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION: I
1. Consistency with General Plan �
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing Zoning- �
classification.
2. Site Suitability �
The property is adeguate in size and shape to accommodate I
the proposed development relative to structures, parking,
walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development
features required by the Zoning Ordinance.
3. Compatibilitv
The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of
f
commercial developments; therefore, the project will be �
compatible with the surrounding land uses. I
4. Compliance with Development Standards �
The proposal meets the development standards required by the '
Zoning Ordinance for the proposed use. I
5. Conditions of Approval i
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions �
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have I
a negative effect on the values of the surrounding !
properties or interfere with or endanger the public health,
safety or welfare. i
6. Benefits to Communitv !
I
The proposal will eliminate the potential problems I
associated with vacant businesses.
I
DISK D-9:87106CUP
�
I
+ I
I
I
_ I
7. Environmental Assessment
This development is categorically exempt from the provisions
; of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended (Section 15303,
i
Class 3).
r
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2183.
1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No.
' 87106, will not have a significant effect on the
environment.
� 2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 87106, subject
to the stated conditions and requirements.
I
�
�
Attachments• I
1. Location Map I
2. Site Plan
3. Resolution No. 2183
I
�
i
�
I
i
I
�
'
I
D-9:87106CUP +
�
1
�
�
�
�
_._ I
: RESOLUTION N0. 2183
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A CONDZTIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR THE REPAIR AND INSTAL-
LATION OF AN AUTOMOBILE ALARM BUSINESS IN THE
C-3 (HEAVY COMMERCIAL) ZONE, 5130 IMPERIAL HWY.,
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
pursuant to law, held a public hearinq on subject application;
WHEREAS, the Commission has carefully considered all
pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that this project is
; categorically exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guide-
lines, as amended (Section 15303, Class 3).
WHEREAS, the project is consistent with the General
Plan in that the subject site is designated "Commercial" on the
General Plan Map;
The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood does
hereby resolve as follows:
' SECTION 1. The Planning Commission of the City of
' Lynwood finds and concludes as follows:
A. That the granting of the proposed Conditional Use
Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan.
B. That the proposed location of the Conditional Use
is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning I
Ordinance and the purpose of the zone in which the I
site is located;
. I
C. That the proposed location of the Conditional Use i
and the conditions under which it would be �
operated or maintained will not be detrimental to �
the public health, safety, or welfare, or
materially injurious to properties or improvements
; in the vicinity; . �
D. That the proposed Conditional Use Permit will I
: comply with each of the applicable provisions of I
the Zoning Ordinance as stated in the conditions
below: �
i
SECTZON 2, The Planning Commission of the City of I
Lynwood approves the proposed project subject to the following
conditions:
i
. f
I
�
, �
�
�
I
I
' Disk D-9:Reso2183 �
I
�
' i
�
' I
Community Development Department
; 1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments.
; 2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement
of Acceptance stating the he/she has read, understands, and
' agrees to the conditions within fifteen (15) days from the
` date of approval by the Site Plan Review Committee.
7
Planning Division
3. All work shall be performed entirely within a building.
4. Five (5) off-street parking spaces shall be provided. The
spaces are to be clearly striped with wheelstops inserted at
, the head of each space.
, a. One (1) space shall be designed for the handicapped.
b. All parking spaces shall be independently accessible, and
shall be arranged for exiting without backing into a
street.
c. Parking area shall be illuminated with lights directed �
and shielded to prevent light intrusion to adjacent
properties.
5. The property shall be used solely for the repair and
installation of automobile alarms per plans submitted,
conditions imposed and future approved modifications thereto. I
6. A trash enclosure shall be installed in accordance with
Building Division standards.
7. Business identification signs shall be approved by the
Planning and Building Divisions. �
8. Any vehicles awaiting service shall be screened from I
Imperial Highway and the alley to the south by a six (6')
foot high masonry wall or a fence covered with an opaque
material approved by the Planning Division.
�
9. Automobiles awaiting repair should be separated from the �
customer parking area. i
10. All necessary permits and licenses shall be obtained prior to I
operation. i
11. A landscaped area of at least five (5�) of the total area of ;
the site shall be improved with well-maintained landscaping, I
12. All Lynwood Municipal Code and Zoning Ordinance requirements �
shall be met. i
I
I
Fire Department �
13. Provide approved portable fire extinguishers. '
I
�
I
Disk D-9:Reso2183 �
I
I
I
I
i
Public Works/Engineering Division
14. Submit a drainage plan.
15. Reconstruct a grading plan prepared and signed by a
registered Civil Engineer.
16. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk along Imperial Highway.
17. Reconstruct damaged and substandard drive approach(es), per
City standards.
18. Construct 5' foot wide planter to separate the sidewalk from
the lot.
19. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass.
20. Fence along alley must be reconstructed.
21. Exit through existing alley.
Section 3. A copy of this resolution shall be delivered
to the applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of March, 1988,
by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: j
I
I
Vicente L. Mas, Director I
Community Development Dept. General Counsel I
I
I
I
�
Disk D-9:Reso2183
�
r
I
I
� or � �
1�,'� �
��_ '__—_ ���/
1 —'—'--= _ —��
� l ��✓'� ���� ? � ;
/
� i �I /// �i / %�,��
\ 1 / -.. /� /`a
0 � �r.
1 �� 1 �� / /� ' /� �s� � r•r
�� W� ��� '// /� � n RD 6��, Q5[6
r �J , � .�
/ �J j 1p L
_� { O ///�/ rn1FO u e ( o .
Q
in � /� �� i1 d o1,
� 1 0 \1 �' / / // �,` & � `� a
�
1 ` � � G . 'd 1 , 1 p
i� �{ � � � i/•_ \\\ /� 'k ' � 1 „ `-Ji o � F T �
� � 1 h �,. zn
�� 1� j 1 \\ // 1 � 1 �p � A 1
.. , 1 1 �`\ II // /` b 9��e l 10 1 1 1n �� ( 1= _
r\ /l ll (r� d'�ea�el 1 � 1 6 ^�� �:
I 1�� �� �� i -.. t d. I 1
i �� \ �.. � / ���Y� e. �
1 \ \��.
� ..,
/ 1 \ �� i SN _
e
' 1 \/ ` r
" ��'. � r _ � � t�_
1 H�\TiM �
ti x
o. ' �<
e. �
�� \�
,,,, 6° �� o �.�. S�S�a `?C'
�, m 1 .
: l�? n �
W
Q oa
cv
, rn f'
^✓•' :�'
, ",
..
'� 3 nv
,
� �,,, �,�
`
N4 ilf
;° ; F
� . �
o '
W o4 '
�
� m
a w rt
;^,,,;
9v ' y\ y
� �
s�y/v �I ���.y
�'•- 'e
R eF. 9\ � -�
R " - i 1 } Y�
m g >
� _ -
�� Pi. I �'' . �� (X9r 1 �ti � �
D 3Ad � �, �„ se� �Wy a = Sc��ec�b
g �� ,� � i a l a n�I n ulo a�� a [r I r al .
�cs� , � L• � : a . . . . oc or sr .
_"` �R ` �cez . s�z o�¢ ioE �os �os
„•s `" , a t s �� m d��l' �� s'I - � -
V ' `ry ,o r �
�/ Q
os ,s �' 8an"',c � ` R V
c� �to�s �° san o o, os
' as ,s C ' 9 `� c $�.�, y I e_ ¢ � s
. � m' A �,F'.�.e s ��. '�. 56Z Z�E6Z_.Z6Z �6Z
- s3wvrls�
` r�
o. �,o. .� \o.e.. �...�
�\ ., �
% ��e.. � �4 � v `� �.
c , � 5 �� • e�� � �� u
, c� � �<
��...,. �� ��
w�9
e.fini i.o.i�.., ..e,
� 1 .
N N` �`. �:. �.. � �, . E a\x �
e �3�H ,_.00.o ..,,�� 711NV"liN
�
1'.
a� ���
s
�. G
• a
IZ
i� i
��� ��'
e �` ` � j' �
, r�
%`�/ � G
�� � ' m a
� � � =� �'-I
- aA' � j � .oc
„ 3i17
_ _ � a "` _
H��
�6
0
O N � � X
._
�iv a ar
Y6[[ Oi
�i� �� � CJ� .�
��e _ sN ,
¢ •
� px
w
Z04
+�^ .�. .�� .
e I i � ?I -
6bZ alz �bz 98z �
381 6�1 O�s 161 „261
_. _. �^ `_-�t ' ... ,_
g .ai1V
., .. .. y . - s.
Tc I L �� '� 5 S e% S �_ _ �__
I bl ; - j' ° I o "
� sol �ei ¢e� �ei rei oei eti ek� �ii eu
'� a . . cr os
a
3�V
09
1 1� �
��w nioel ��o�
� ,. . ,
r
'A
�i
G
I
� � ViiRIGHT ST A L L Y ltTL�l✓T/C/�I�f 'i
.. � ' RE,cR I
b i --��/,�T�J!{{:f �
, _ � ��
I I P,4 Kl/�G ASPN�IT � `
I �. � � ( NORTN
3!'--�-�'4 - ;,
3
I /
1 ' �
., ,:..
., r � ;
, S�
� � sc�%E I=2o'
� ��� � � � DATE
I ��.� TU/�i)%��6l�,40/US78'
�oe RfNTERS � ERic' osoaia
�' I 5�3a /rNPfRL4L NN�V
1I3 637-BrlQ
L'✓N h�000 fi1. 9�?62
0 Off/CE 70' CD/✓CRETE i
` 5730 /MPER/AL HWV
. I ?/3 63T ' 65l6 �
19' J?=�- 19 t v.v r✓oOD CA. 90762
� � ..
� � //� � � O {� � E �ACfRED h'OBCE �
N 0 �90D GREEN TOP
(AKF WO00 CA 90804 �
o ?!3 4?l-�066
� ��
" Rfh'TAf I I I
' , PROPfRTY �
_ L/NE Q ' I
�- - --� �� �
-_.. ,
' • � SIDfW.�LK _. : ':,_ .' I
. SlJO ' � � � ! I
GRASS �r y l Y TREE
, ..
. '..
I
, I
i
�
i
, �
:, � _ _
-
I
� I . . . � �/o � ,
. . .s: �
i
_�_
�°.;�,i�"���1 �1� i�E���� NO.�.��
� � , j a �, L �, asaaacv.�
! 1 � �.. � V � ..
.. . _'.'-- _,...-'�
DATE: March 8, 1988
T0: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 88001
APPLICANT: 0'dell R. Hadley, Jr.
PROPOSAL•
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to open a
store to sell new and used items at 3827 Century Boulevard, in
the C-2 (Medium Commercial) zone.
FACTS•
1. Source of Authoritv.
Section 25-10 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that
a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to operate any
business selling used items.
2. Propertv Location.
The subject property is located on Century Boulevard west of
Ernestine Avenue (See attached Location Map).
3. Propertv Size.
The subject property is approximately fifty (50') wide and
one hundred forty (140') feet deep; the total area is
approximately 7,000 square feet.
4. Existin Land Use. I
�
The site is presently developed with retail shops. The
surrounding land uses are as follows:
North - Residential East - Residential
South - Commercial West - Commercial I
5. Land Use Description. r
I
The General Plan designation for the subject property is I
Commercial, and the zoning classification is C-2 (Light f
Commercial). The surrounding land uses are as follows: �
�
Disk 10-1:SSOOOcup �
�
General Plan: Zoning:
North - Commercial North - C-2
South - Commercial South - C-2
East - Multi-Family Residential East - R-3
West - Multi-Family Residential West - CB-1
6. Project Characteristics
The applicant proposes to sell new and used items --
appliances, lamps, bric-a-brac, etc., in an existing building
within a shopping center. He proposes to use approximately
2,100 square feet of store space. There is sufficient parking
at the rear of the site for the proposed use.
7. Site Plan Review
At its regular meeting on February 18, 1988, the Site Plan
Review Committee approved the proposed project, subject to the
conditions and requirements stated in the attached Resolution.
8. Zoning Enforcement Historv
None of record.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
1. Consistency with General Plan
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing Zoning
classification and Commercial designation of the General Plan.
2. Site Suitabilitv
The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
proposed development relative to structures, parking, walls,
fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features
required by the Zoning Ordinance.
Century Boulevard is a major arterial and is well suited
to carry the quantity of traffic the proposed development
would generate.
3. Compatibility
The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of
commercial developments in a shopping center; therefore, the
project will be compatible with the surrounding land uses.
4. Compliance with Development Standards �
The proposal meets the development standards required by the
Zoning Ordinance with respect to front, side, and rear yard
setbacks; distance between structures; lot coverage; building.
height; and density.
5. Conditions of Approval
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a
negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties
or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or
- welfare.
Disk 10-1:88000cup ;
�
I
I
I I
I
6. Benefits to Community
The proposed development will aid in upgrading the commercial
strip along Century Boulevard and will eliminate the potential
problems associated with vacant buildings.
7. Environmental Assessment
This development is categorically exempt from the provisions
of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended (Section 15303,
Class 3).
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2168:
1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No.
88000, will not have a significant effect on the
environment.
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 88000, subject
to the stated conditions and requirements. '
ATTACHMENTS
1. Location Map '
2. Site Plan �
3. Resolution No. 2168 I
I
I
I
�
I
�
�
I I
I
I
I
�
I
Disk 10-1:88000cup �
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
�
�� �
I
' LOCAI'ION iVIAP
I
_
; -�- � - - - ,
__ _ _ , ,
_ J ' ., ,. _
- . --- , , „ , , � �
_„ , ,,, �., �_ , I i
_ _,.,,,__ � �-- -- ------_ _ _ -- . ,
_ �,,.
- �
.. y
�
,.;�o _ , ' - ` � " ;
.. :�� .
_ _ .. _.... �:,�, ,
<�. - i'"
1fltl .^flp .:JII .)1 .JJ .!)) ."IA :`JS GOIi -' �, 1� ��
l�L .5'\. ` h. .
. �� :' ` \. � y� / � ... .
. � � S . :. ��2 �. ; _ /
— --- '"��zCF 1,.
.y i �,
( �i) \ 1 � Y 2 � : j,� - �
., _ � _ _ — . '. \/
:. . � _
. .. .. .. .. . .
�� ... I .. / . _ .. _— 1 Ji � �� ., ` N
1 �6 l� �\
✓1 � 2j � .�:�. A �E ,
^ J .. �).' I� ,. �., :)�'+ � 1 ?. �..
��5 � ��20G�� 2t15 2i �l 203 242 2 I 2 l� 0 . 2 � ��5 � :
. :l � : �1'•� ,
— a v i � �. 2> 23 )•- .. ?
< . p�. . � � ?)S .:i r
r {� . �2)4 'i � �
2j J F1
8 o�vo. s' ; '-,
,
\ �CFNTUf. ��r >, ;:
,� .. .e ., ,. „ ..,_. Va .; r` :., ,;•, �
'.;,si �� .. ` ,i� ' , . , �
� : It �r
: 11] ? 116 �ii5 ' Ila ' 11� �;112 �III I10'�. 109 �09 ;
� i � i4�rv. ��W . �i� .
�. � I � i � �' Q .' . C
x eN r��
, . � � .,,. ,�:,, , ., • �
� ,,,;, . .. .o • „ �
:..>.......,.:.... .-:.... .,,,... ,,..�,,... .,
I� �N i),I I I 1 1 Ili/i»r�� � jl �..
wi.0 " r . • • • Ie W Z.� I
� Z l
�o •• �� l0✓� � ♦ . � F . . `. ) .
�� �_ . ; �; ' ' ° ol � �' '
� 1 1�8 9? I�0��121� 122�� Iw3y 124q 125+ 128± 12 3 W .' �� �...
>
m " . ` I • I •: .. .... ��w � �. , / 'Q 'j ��..'-. 1
� 0 �
� ', �
I
1
f
I
1
(
, I
. I
�
.
. I
�W V
88000
RESOLUTION N0. 2168
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR 0'DELL HADLEY TO SELL NEW AND USED
ITEMS AT 3827 CENTURY BOULEVARD�' LYNWOOD�
CALIFORNIA� IN THE C-2 (LIGHT COMMERCIAL)
ZONE.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood, did
pursuant to law, conduct a public hearing with respect to the above
subject; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
considered all pertinent testimony offered at the Public Hearing;
and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has determined
that the project is ecempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines, as amended (Section 15303, Class 3).
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines as follows:
A. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and
shape to accomodate said use:
B. There will be no adverse effect on abutting property or
improvements in the vicinity, as consideration has been
given to adjacent properties in the surrounding area.
C. Granting of said permit will not be contrary to, or
adversely affect, the General Plan of the City, as the
subject property is designated for commercial purposes.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
approves a Conditional Use Permit No. 88000, subject to the
following conditions:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments.
2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement
of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and
agrees to the conditions of the resolution within fifteen (15)
days from the date of approval of said resolution by the
Planning Commission.
�
PLANNING DIVISION
3. The Community Development Department shall have the right of
reasonable inspection. as with any other business within the
City, for the purpose of protecting the general health,
safety and welfare.
4. All business identification signs shall be approved by the
Building and Planning Divisions prior to installation.
5. No merchandise shall be displayed for sale outside of the
building in the public right-of-way.
Disk 10-1:Reso2168
1
6. A trash receptable shall be installed.
7. Fifty-one (51�) percent of the total sales shall be from new
items.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
8. Provide approved 2AlOB/C portable fire extinguisher.
9. Provide minimum clear aisle width of not less than 36 inches.
10. No storage permitted around water heater.
,�
� APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of March, 1988, by members �
° of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
;'
ABSTAIN:
. Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director I
' Community Development Dept. General Counsel +
I
Disk 10-1:Reso2168
I
�
2
I
� i I
_ � _ _ — _ _ _ _ _ � � �'n�q �.�n�,u I i
_. —. . i
— ! — — — — — I i
I
� �—� ��-� � �
� y a Q � � �'
� � (L j I
� /d^G i I
� �
n i
�
c C I
4 r �
R k �, i
doy5 � � �
Ua�O �1,1`i! R 1"�"�'y fnaj �-��1 �' � �
P �
� � +
�
N
r
�
uad O �
( I
i
I i
uad o
� �
_ � �
��
i � i
� j
I
�
! �
. i
' - Po_rl� , in� l�o+ , ;
� _ .. - �
p . . . .. . . . ' ' .. . . ' � . ' . . . . . ' .
�.' ` ,._-
���C. ,:-, r., r._ . „��_� ��
7,•_... ,� .. .
� r\ _.
I�t�J i� 1`� i �. �.�8�8-003"i`PM-°^'°�
DATE: March 8, 1988
T0: Planning Commission
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map No. 19583
Case No. 88001TPM
Applicant: St. Francis Medical Center
PROPOSAL
This is an application for a Tentative Parcel Map approval to
combine three (3) Lots (Lot No. 12, 13, and 14 of Tract 20680) at
the southeast corner of Century Blvd. and Brenton Ave, in the CB-
1(Controlled Business) zone, to be developed as a dormitory
for the Daughters of Charity.
FACTS
1. The site will be developed as a dormitory; the existing
structures will be remodeled.
2. The proposal was approved by the Site Plan Review Committee,
(February 18, 1988) subject to conditions.
3. Environmental assessment: The Community Development
Department has determined that the Tentative Parcel Map is
exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as
amended, Section 15061 (b) (3).
4. Approval of a Tentative Parcel Map is required by the State
Subdivision Map Act and Subdivision Regulations of the City
of Lynwood.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS:
1. The lots proposed to be combined are in conformity with the
zoning ordinance and the zone in which the development is to
be located.
2. The proposed division of land is consistent with applicable
General Plan Elements of the City of Lynwood. �
RECOMMENDATIONS: I
1. Find that Tentative Parcel Map No. 19583 is exempt from the I
provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended in Section '
15061 (b) (3), , I
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2177, approving Tentative Parcel Map No. I
19583 subject to the stipulated conditions and requirements. f
I
ATTACHMENTS I
1. Location Map. �
2. Tentative Parcel Map No. 19583
3. Resolution No. 2177,
�
Disk 10-1:88001TPM I
I
I
I
�
_ �
; J,.. ,. -
RESOLUTION N0. 2177
' A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
-� CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
N0. 19583 TO COMBINE LOTS 12, 13, AND 14�
� TRACT N0. 20680� 3584 CENTURY BOULEVARD� LYNWOOD,
CALIFORNIA.
'' WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of
s' Lynwood, pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the
„ subject application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully
considered all pertinent testimony offered in the case as
presented at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the preparation, filing and recordation of a
Parcel Map is required for the proposed commercial development;
and
. WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has
, determined that the proposed project is categorically exempt from
the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended, Section
15061 (B) (3);
Section 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find
and determine that said Tentative Parcel Map No. 19583 should be
' approved for the following reasons: I
. A. The combination of lots meets all the
applicable requirements and conditions
' imposed by the State Subdivision Map Act
and the Subdivision Regulations of the
Lynwood Municipal Code.
B. The proposed combination of lots is
consistent with the applicable elements of
, the General Plan and the Official Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Lynwood.
C. Proper and reasonable provisions have been �
made for adequate ingress and egress to the
lots being combined. I
- Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of i
, Lynwood hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 19583, subject to (
the following conditions: �
I
Planning Division �
1. Within twenty-four (24) months after approval or conditional
approval of the Tentative Parcel Map, the subdivider shall
file with the City of Lynwood, a final parcel map in �
substantial conformance with the Tentative Parcel Map as
approved or conditionally approved, and in conformance with
the Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of I
the City of Lynwood.
2. Prior to the expiration of the Tentative Parcel Map, the I
subdivider may file an application with the Community �
Development Department for Planning Commission action on an
extension of the expiration period. �
�
Disk 10-1:Reso2177 I
I
(
I
i
i
i
. 1 I
I
�
- . i
.. � .
3. The final parcel map shall be filed with the City Engineer
of the City of Lynwood.
Fire Department Conditions
4. Submit plans for any proposed new construction.
5. Any alterations which exceed ten-thousand (10,000) sq, ft.,
an automatic sprinkler system shall be installed.
Public Florks Department Conditions
(See Exhibit A attached herewith)
Section 3 : A certified copy of this resolution shall
be delivered to the applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of March, 1988, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
� AYES:
' NOES:
ABSENT:
: ABSTAIN:
�
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson I
, APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
�
Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department General Counsel
�
I
I
�
(
'
Disk 10-1:Reso2177 �
�
2 i
t
, --,s r �; i:= a � ! : n. �"i !�':�� !`r ti. _ SG� •-----��
;�...;::�.�;�_ ,_ �
. fi .
- <, 88001ZC
�, .��,'. �.`;'
, „_:;:_ , j ,,.: -_- _.. _ -._------.�,
DATE: March 8, 1988
T0: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE - CASE N0. 88001
Applicant: St. Francis Medical Center
3630 E. Century Blvd.
� Lynwood, CA. 90262
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting a Zone Change and a Tentative Parcel
Map. The Zone Change from the current zoning designation of CB-
1(Controlled Business Zone) to H-M-D (Hospital-Medical-Dental
Zone) would allow the land use of dormitory to which this
proposal addresses.
The intent of the Zone Change would permit the current use of
medical office to be converted to a dormitory for housing twelve
(12) members of the Daughters of Charity.
The Convent would be ancillary to the hospital since the
residents of the proposed facility would be providing health care
services directly to the hospital.
The current zoning on the site of CB-1 does not permit the use of
dormitories, therefore, the necessity for the zone change.
FACTS
The site is located on the southeast corner of Century Blvd. and
Brenton Avenue, 3584 Century Blvd. occupied by two one-story
medical buildings; parking for the medical use is located on a
separate lot across the alley to the west. The lot used for
parking of the medical buildings is not part of this proposal.
It is unclear at this time whether the lot would remain for
parking and who or what it would serve. The parking lot is
zoned R-3.
ISSUES & ANALYSIS
The present zoning designation permits less intense types of
businesses primarily office or commercial retail types of uses.
Residential uses are not permitted in the Commercial zoning
districts.
The applicant's request to change the zoning would allow the
modification of an existing one-story medical office building to
a residential facility. Physically, the exterior of the building
would have little change. The major modifications would take
place in the interior remodeling. The applicant has indicated
that there would be twelve (12) people residing in the complex.
Since the residents would be members of the Daughters of Charity
religious order and assigned to the St. Francis Medical Center,
the need for parking would be limited to approximately six (6)
spaces, as the proximity of the hospital to the residential
facility is two (2) blocks away. It is anticipated that there
would be a coordinated car-pool system and/or walking
arrangements, negating the need for twelve (12) parking spaces
plus guest parking.
DISK 24:88001zC
The current zoning as well as the proposed zone change is
consistant with the General Plan designation of Commercial. The
applicant has submitted a parcel map to combine lots 12, 13 and
; 14 which are developed with the medical office.
The Site Plan Review Committee has received and approved the
.proposed plans of the site. ,
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Pursuant to Section 15073 of the State CEQA Guidelines, as
amended, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. It has been
' determined that the project could not have a significant effect
on the environment based upon the completion of the Initial Study
. and Environmental Checklist, which has found that there.are no
significant impacts resulting from the project.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission:
a) Adopt Resolution No. 2176 recommending City Council
' adoption of Zoning Amendment, Case No. 88001.
b) Recommend that the City Council certify the Negative
Declaration as adeguate.
Attachments
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
3. Resolution No. 2176
I
I
�
DISK 24:88001ZC
I
I
k , .
�. asooi �
�
;
�
� RESOLUTION N0. 2176
a� '.
�
' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION'.
z RECOMMENDING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LYNWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE
`. PERTAINING TO THE OFFICIAL ZONING ORDINANCE� CHANGTNG
z: ° THE ZONING` ON LOTS 12� 13� AND 14� LOCATED AT 3584
CENTURY BOULEVARD, DESIGNATED AS ZONE CHANGE N0..88001.
. • WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, pursuant to law, conduct a
t public hearing on a proposed zone change for certain properties as
F described above; and
WHEREAS, the Commission reports that legal publication was made in �
` the Lynwood Press, that notice to property owners was mailed, and
�." notice of hearing was posted, all as required by ordinance and in the
" time required by 1aw; and
r, NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood �
does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows:
Section 1. The Commission recommends a change of zone from CB-1
_ 'to H-M-D for the properties, as designated in the ordinance and map
,' attached hereto, marked Exhibit A, based on the following findings:
' A. The current CB-1 (Controlled Business) zone of the subject
„' site is consistent with the General Plan designation.
B,. The subject site would accomodate the proposed development due
to its size, location and proximity to the medical center
� complex land use.
C. A zone change to H=M-D (Hospital-Medical-Dental) would be
-.
consistent with the General Plan designation of commerial.
� D. The proposed zone change will not be detrimental to the
• '' properties surrounding the subject site.
Section 2. Pursuant to the terms and provisions of the State CEQA •
� � Guidelines, as amended, Section 15073, the Director of Community
; Development caused a Negative Declaration to be prepared, and the
Commission recommends that the City Council certify said Negative
' Declaration.
Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends City Council
' adoption of an ordinance,changing the zoning classification from CB-1
(Controlled Business) to H-M-D. (HOSpital-Medical-Dental) of the
, following properties, legally described as:
Lots 12, 13 and 14, Tract No. 20680, commonly known as 3584
: Century Boulevard, Lynwood, California.
DISK 24c88001RES
,
i
- APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of March, 1988, by the members
` of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
� �� �
; ,
AYES:
h
' NOES:
ABSENT:
t;
ABSTAIN:
,;
LUCILLE KANKA, CHAIRPERSON
y APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director General Counsel
Community Development Dept.
G
i
Y
F
� ' � . - . � . . . , . � .
Y�
DISK 24:88OO1RES
L
a � . .
88001
, ORDINANCE N0.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
' OF LYNWOOD AMENDING CHAPTER 25, THE OFFICIAL
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE LYNWOOD MONICIPAL
CODE, WITH RESPECT TO A ZONE CHANGE ON LOTS
" 12, '13 & 14 OF TRACT 20680 LOCATED AT 3584
`t CENTURY BOULEVARD, LYNWOOD, CA., FROM CB-1
(CONTROLLED BUSINESS) TO H-M-D (HOSPITAL-
MEDICAL-DENTAL).
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES HEREBY FIND,
RESOLVE AND DETERMINE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 25 of the Lynwood Municipal Code and the
Zoning Map of the City of Lynwood are hereby amended to
' reclassify certain real property described as follows: Tract
20680, lots 12, 13, and 14, commonly known as: 3584 Century
Blvd., Lynwood, Ca.
Section 2. Amendment of the Lynwood Zoning Map for Lots 12,
13 and 14 of Tract 20680 is consistent with the General Plan of
' the City of Lynwood.
Section 3. SEVERABILITY. If any section,' subsection,
subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this
ordinance, or the application thereof to any person or place, is
for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
ordinance or its application to other persons or places.
The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted
this ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision,
sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the
fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences,
clauses, phrases, or portions, or the application thereof to any
person or place, be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said
City held on the day of , 1988, and finally ,
adopted and ordered published at a meeting of
said Council held on the day of , 1988, by I
; the following vote: ��
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
' PAUL RICHARDS, II, MAYOR ,
DISK 24:880010RD
I
I
11�i
:�
--.—...-- µ,—„ � — _J
r�
�,,,,+� �.
�,���.
- �.
�I�r'���� �,�������� ;
�� .��l�
.
�
:
�-
� 1lOBYY � � � �' ,
�
y . . . i
�� S �_� .. �F � T4-e'
'" kT�r Yt �
1
.
u =.,. ...... _
w , ....
SL
�:� a
z ---... - I . .
� �
t I '
� a �
��.
� s�,� �
,� .
�nr
i . .
iw' � y
� W '
i
`� �`�
AYMN9�M
.
� �
� �O{ w mr R � 5 ��', � � i .Y �� ;
�h y'I�� � y�4 C 4 r ,
a: �
� xl w 4��� �n ��. �' `�' `'�`�`' ^�"
�` hr sw 4ti y �� ��� �
I
t
� � � pi7i �d I
— lUI� RlW . � 1
� o� n
; L. y �2 �1v� rsi� ror� _ ` a ��ii �+p' w
� i�, %I dr
e.
0o c
,'�. 5i 6 .'iw:�1n n o, ��,
`' �! �M i�' .sr�, r£
� � I � I :aanl � .
— I � G ii0' _. �
� , ; e���� .x F�
� �° �:
"a �i= �i u� �;�„�� ��� =�c'
� P �
� a1 ll)! �OI�� pp I y I V
� (^4�IN Yilw �I�� it0� � I IpF �
»W•���y��` •�'�M A�LO// iL;U
.��
� s ,�, u
�.� �
�~ ` � � �
.� �a,e �ru ..� �:�., . � '.,pt f
; � w �p o I^ P, �000n � �.. �
_�� , r�.r .` t
� � a
��� ' A I S9�Srl �
0
brt �!S atw( �"
} .2 �.owr �
R
d�dV1! NOIlt��O�
- �^J'�
,.� e
la� SFa/
i w
r •� �
���1 ik.l
^
�s1�
• A .
.i '
r r /�* �
w
4
�,� _
� !
.
� .;
' � N� 5`a `�.
` �" �0�� � ��' F S1�loPPtN6C�AIT'EK- �
�O�'. Gt.ttR-�D�JUSIa� �
C � Rt%Pt�k � St�R1�R
p.�T
` F tir � ,�o�o��i►�T �uu�a�� �Prs��
�' ,�'�,� � `$ � r �}� ,�R y. � � � cu:� sttGP .sN�� sroa-�
� " �c� ���y p�Sl�t� � VIbL'� S'fotL�
. �'a � 6s. c�o'�` �• � NIt�1TcWg��-� (.+Quo�SR�R�
; � � . s�ak ,� . � so �kST �ot� CZ� ��g Stoi� (3)
� " � � � PI.I/s�1C�
z `� � �,� � . :;;�- D6ilN ftP
1 � ' '
� � ` �' '�9NAT1C[/tL
. �� 2 /
o, ` � tt /
�o ! 3 � � .. y �
s a ' �
J ` `' C
; � � � � Q �cd�ha� sd s� ��,�
Zti � ,�
YYlezlWm �n{T,i � s `'� s9 N(� __ _ a
'j ��� �du,+, 1 � �
T--c j� Q �� . `r / 6' ��� /� y� tr1r� H
I�CN I G�
;,, .� -,
W
•- 1\ ' v •/� (y / [('��
� V /� / J � ,B A �^ � � � , �\\ �( �ZJ
> �, � � 8 , � U � „- � VD
3 ` p �E,J3G`° �, Sy d Ma ��
°. �� 0 9 � �" � ��7.1�
�. 7 c p p i r . CqY1��� 4� 1� �.
� a
� � c� �ti O 0.ri � 5 `
- �'�� ,�
\ p, '� c�/ h , - �Sh �, � F � v
N �' �ti `'o /
° � s o x 2� .. O2 �
n � n i ' :4 B 3 ;' 6 �4,
. .r�, li�G� `J �% . 3l �
v' S�� a��� r O' t 7_T.56�.�r
6 ''' l �3
o y� � � so 4 a .5 3 1 i y � n�.� ,t`� �Dn ��
r.�>>� ,� � g �4 a s m1f11 ��' �iGi y � e
' / >_ 4✓"`. zx� r N.?.. .\``\ p A�i.1DIC�jU1l..
1'[�ti" [
7RACT NO. 20680 � � ," " „ s h , '� `� \y a BUILDI�NG DIVISION � '
� - _�� °° � ! C.4uldtcni
co�e M.B. 552-4-6 h 6 � y
a� o � � JC�' REC'D N��I',(� ,ai.' ��'
�Uh7� �ti �S ��U. P ol�ide�SP�{��
608 i � � /
0089 s� 6' Cln OF LYNWObD `
�
( �'!Q' � '�'=izo � � �� . �y
. �de� ��de.�i,al C�-e �ul� �
a ASSESSOA'S MAP �
" FOR-PREV. ASSM'T. SEE�: _863 . - - - � �� _ �
COUHTY OF-LOS ANGELES, CdLIF.
- .- �: - - �' .
. - - ' - - � . � . � - . � ... . . . � . _ . _/. . � �� . .
• ..:,-_..�
P,G �P�' �,� �3� n�1 �� 0. ,_._.�
� �: , , , ,.
- DATE: March 8, 1988 ��(,;_ ,"'
_ 'ivi_ i�`���. aann�
— ,_,,,�
T0: PLANNING COMMISSION
< FROM:� Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 88003
Applicant: Effie L. Porth
1314 E. Compton Blvd.
Compton, CA. 90221
" PROPOSAL �'
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to establish
a headstart program at 11555 Wright Road, Lynwood, CA., located
at Ham Park. The applicant is leasing space from the City of
- Lynwood. "
� FACTS :
1. Source of Authority ,
� Section 25-11.3 Any use Conditionally permitted in any
_ commercial zone within the City. Child care is conditionally
. permitted in the Commercial zone.
2. Property Location
-. The site is located at 11555 Wright Road, Lynwood, CA. (Ham
Park Community Center); the site is zoned M(.Manufacturing).
3. Property Size
Ham Park occupies approximately 10-1/2 acres. A portion of
the site was leased to the Charles Drew Headstart Program by
the City Council on September 1, 1987.
�� 4. Existing Land Uses
The site is surrounded by the following land uses:
, North: Residential/Mfg. East: Manufacturing
South: Residential/Mfg. West: Residentia2
,
5. Land Use Description j
' General Plan Zoning i
North: Manufacturing/MUlti-Family Res. M/R-3 I
South: Industrial/Single-Family Res. M
East: Industrial M
West: Single-Family Residential R-2
6. Project Characteristics
The site is fully developed by the Park and Abbott House.
The headstart proqram would occupy the existing patio area
aad grounds. The modification made by headstart to
accommodate the children is to fence a separate play area
which is equipped with playground apparatus. The play are,a
does not occupy any of the required parking spaces for the
park.
DISK 10-T:88003CUP
. 1
,�T. _ ., � �
�
,f
7. Site Plan Review
At its regular meeting of February 18, 1988, the Site Plan
`;, Review Committee approved the proposed project, subject to
the conditions and requirements stated in the attached �
�
Resolution. .
8. Zoning Enforcement History . �
None.on record.
�
Analysis and Conclusion
1. Consistency with the General Plan
The proposed land use is consistent with the zoning of 'Mfg.
(M); however, the General Plan Designation is Public. While
the zoning designation is not consistent with the General
Plan land use designation, the use is consistent, in that, a
community center with ancillary activities and facilities are
- permitted.
� 2. Site Suitability:
The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
proposed headstart program which would serve a maximum of
40 children in two (2) sessions. The existing parking
facilities easily accommodate the traffic for delivery and
pick-up of children.
3. Compatibility:
I
- The proposed use is considered ancillary to the community
center use and would be consistent with the uses of �
surrounding properties.
4. Compliance with Development Standards „ I
- Specific Findings:
- a. The granting of the proposed Conditional Use Permit will
not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan,
- since the proposed use is consistent with the land uses I
- permitted within the commercial designation, it is
conditionally permitted in the Manu£acturing zone.
" b. The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord
with the objectives of this Chapter and the purpose of
: the zone in which the site is located. 7�e proposed use
is ancillary to the community center.
c. The proposed location of the conditional use and the
conditions under which it would be operated or maintained
will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
e improvements in the vicinity.
The site can easily accommodate the proposed headstart
program, since the parking is adequate botki in size of
� the,lot as well as location, and is consistent with the
i
neighborhood.
,,
; d. The proposed conditional use will comply with each of the
applicable provisions of this Chapter, since the proposed
use is consistent with the development standards of the
Lynwood Municipal Code.
DISK 10-1:88003CUP
2
„ I
�r• .
5. Conditions of Approval:
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a
- negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or
interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare.
6. Environmental Assessment
This development is Categorically Exempt from the provisions of
the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended.
<
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning
_ Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2180:
1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit Case No. 88003,
_
will not have a significant affect on the environment. I
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 88003, subject to i
the stated findings and conditions. I
I
I
- �
i
- I
i
�
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map ;
- 2. Resolution No. 2180 I
- 3. Site Plan
I
�
I
I
, �
� I
�
�
I
I
I
�
I
Disk 10-1:88003cup
I
3
�' �.:.. �. \ �`} ) b �v i o ' . . .. . . . .. .
� , [�u.. Y¢N�c Yev . . -
• �`�, � . • �u5t4�L PiPE�ur�orlT:voFCUn�::;cq�P.�r.'a9CfL_ /
" �� ' (FUR �bNP.G Frf UtYI iN CONG FW-1NG �
� y .
',.. , . � ,:., ,�,, ��2"55 +c �o" GECn �w encH 6' x�g` v�c+�ic PAr
�ocn�E Fi^_ C , 7rcTEn
� • P40vIDE 2" uE4vY 6AW. BYE eX'itT m� -
��•' � � � G' P�EtiT �UpN�L. ANCNGRED iN EL�CH 8+15���
� GGlG. PIGNIG FAf%' (�o7P1. oF 10). �OG�T£
� .�� _ . � �� r�iR����p .
M1'� / � � . . „ . .. . . , '
'UNT. �' ,i � ,\/� . �
Si•� F�� . / .. . `�` " _
' � bu..l4 � . � ) �
/ E�¢TH"MOOUD � � �� GaNe, .
SHT SE`�_ ' . . PILNIL A0S _� ,(� .
� ' tD�sE �T �iIM T�> �� }(' ,'\
e �.''�� ...,,\ z '\'�.�}.
\/
�� c
0
C � , �° �
_ �c , � _
%� r � P Ei�^Tb .���'
� M4NNOSE�
_�-tl � 6
� � � T O �r � A-R E � '1 - � --" � �:� 51eRM.OVai�l . . .
.. . . - `��snnn .Iit1. .. � y t f' --' -- ` '. _ � � � ,
� � s e W s rK.S. _- .-� ��----_-- ' . ' — . �
� ' — �_ . �'- �--_^_" :.� .
. . _-- � ' - . '"�...
�-' �� � ' �^.���... . � , .� ti�� � j
�0 .
, ../ ' ��-, � � -._— i ��. �.... � . � .�p�r���. .� �•9 � m
-�y�pnlnGLi.F � � . . \.. '"'�
� ._. "— � . � Sev� veT � ��'t .`o.,
/ � .., m
. QL � ��.��� .�� �v \ `ZOO / .. _ p � 0 �' . „ SR'T. (TF7 : ry D
..-- � � ;,-' .. k ' ' ` .`, . p , ,O. �
::�—� . . . . , . a . �2c h . ?° 'h�.,.:.-. .-.�-'� ~ � �` � . �o„ '
= ; aE„ � s . .. � ' � � f/ �. �o-
' '. 1.� / : , ,. \�
- r. � �� � '/q ai.aN• roq >>� �` ..
; , ,
� ,
:: ,.. ; ' �..
: - � . r,' � '. ` "�. � . . �`� c.� _ ,
,- ,� , . , . .� .FUl ,
� � , � ��, � . 4 �_ g` � t ��� \ ..
� r r �y, ,�,, 7' z , a,� � �' �� �. `'. _... . � -�`+
r � �, �,.� y ..
a : � xtinv ; bn�t , a„� , �,,� _�_..... C '�— ,�...
i .<-� . ., k ; ia '� .�. ` aC� � �..�-.• � s f--- �.
,� : . ; ,�Y�+�r � � , �' ���pLF.`� ilPf%nrz/�Tt1r _ ; / w . �—�—.�'
r � p taw.R<�.r� --
7uoi�Yi�w6� �. --^-r"' � �. !I' �.,p��� �ArzEA. '.\\ -'--/.' , �i
3a �L' /
f i' . 3 a �n'� SAqC Fi{.L °� r
.�,.... ' . ��,a c i� i . rC Sy` t� � �v � � 56r5PSC5, �' � _. .� , ,� .
� r . � � r . � � �- . ` �•�<- —�/ . , .
{ a � yo �,e�`C �satl :'� N,� ; ° �653i .�. . . .r�.— r• � .
�`' '%k s ��� �a, �"� `,, ,��� o� � ::. ev�rt�� ..e , �� N �
��� r 2 �,�` �i , t. b ��i 1' � ( 'r � x � ; % � �_ ��
� " S.N � ����` `� .a�. � ' �� . .�.-*r 9__ — _ � .
e � . �
t • . , k ( \ � \ , .
I . � � � iw f ,in„� � �' � . . � _�� :..- - \. .
� e
° i
�'�� r �; . ./ � _>'f` - -- �4,_ A
� � � � �.Ly.... � _
An� � � . ' - Y�S1U I iJ G aviG � j,Q� _ ' % 1� � �
����/ ,.: �, x � .. _ _ _
� / , �,�.;� A r �. .. . ' � i4 , � /. � - .� -- - }
�; . �� . ,: r -;' , � �' 3 ;•,�,�, ,� ��,'/ ._. �..^/ . -���� - -
�
IVIT 6 . .:
� : / , a�� '� " w�'� ", :�' - -- . /� � h 1 � �\ �a..
� . � � y „�xa;, � N �.�' f �; � � � � , ,i �� - . e•o
j � \ � � y i t k � � � C K ( �o` _ / < ( �1� ( � ' �� � � ?C
' 4 � � ,�, t+ r '� . p� o \�f 'l ` '� /\�,.✓', conG..�IAJ -�. .t
, \.. �� . ,� ' �c s rR � �q�ci� �� � � ,
r�a � h« �� �Sc i � '2 , � ��
\ r p
� � r '� � `'/`�� ` i , H y: t' . � fv�.� )\, ,� f I � � .• AR., j'� � �-n
�� t 1� ♦ �p Y f. ' ,'. B;KF 6 Gkb�! � � a 116W '�l� �..
/ { � p ��ry/ '. � 1•` (r �+� w r d y , x .. 4^�fm t ,. d�l.,a.,{
� �� � (. � . �,,� �°' x,�ty..�t�-4?dcv+ws��aky� i> x . :� .'Tjt� ..:.
.."' , , j � l0 i • � � �y* '` t`' ' � . �"y � . r { `F'' ,��4 , ..,, w
� . . � � +� t ° ��i yM �i� .„x r -. � n �� ��t ro �. � hi^y' .4 � .P1y
. . p . ti 0 f (� d "r7 �,� r � < 'S - ' �5k.
' . . ., r, '� QT� n�`p " i � y b�j� � �`� 'Y f� - X
. . , ' i ♦ � S lt � �Y '� �'� 1��' ft ' i �T �� g { C . Yi ' �� �� �t��Y iij• � �, e s��.'„ �
� � � �(� y �i � ,� I R " r i� �s,d r � 9 �' `� .�y�.t � t ., y� a � � � ,
. /p. e 1 " � 9`�1� .T � � ���,�, '^�(,r� t� .. r a � �>r�� , t .
�r�J��.�ftlh � q h� ,t'R^;L� v r:r.. � k r�, � �i' f .,. ��
, ' , i ���. r � r '�n� � Rt�' �� (� i- . • A
� ' i � � .,�i � + t r e y � � 1
, . . . „ �' �� �M �� �7. ' i ��„) � $ �,.�,� i ..�b . y .. a � �'
' �. � V i.. f��{�.� j � r: t y p" Q i� u.• u o
.� i,"�M1 �. Y NN, �.p q +'�m � i ,�,}. y, :� w � x M �J y - 4 z � c;
''rT' �. a 1. � � .� rt9 • �' �` x d�, :. "!yk �Y' ,� �t" R .
- T4G6RC[R2biV --.. h : �
... Or10.0E-Im20AM1A% . y 1 ; 2. ` y„ . d � y�� }�� ��* ��,y �x l� �' � �4.. �f � � � ��f
� ��� � � �n �„r� +4'��.. , ` h , . .r
d38:a2�) . w,+w . ° ` — . . w � . � P c� h.�� {7 � H� �2 con
b , I 1- . � �� y, p ' 64< mKtl2 ;.. .
• . 4 �Q, r :: .... m��.4�(,p,con - P.c:,,. . . ' curcx�T'o[unl,aa.� t. �arcvrte.
_<uTClH�It'PERG�tY � �� ZB.O� � 'O � . �'�•..... R[Wi Gp � i
' _�..__..._«
0 MR N N , 7PMC�T
' C'lc9MNT0 !-"' .. . ..._ ' , �a fWMB TNAU
� . , - 0 RD�! ': �i .
_ . �. � . � . �� ., je'WM � � . ... M _�1��� .
�--""^'- . � �+ .. �2" 4kt . • •— .. � + � .
. .. . � .� . .. . .. , . . . . .. � _ � � - ,
"'�'_'.._._.._... ....-. ._,_. .._.__.._. �. :._. _ ..: .. __"_' .. . . , '� ? �7 � - O n. �. .
�....'_ "":....� ..-...._W_..._. _..�.__... ..__._�._......___...._�_._.._
:- T E P L A �. N #��3
t' a ��-o� .
L. E C�A'L f�E�Gf71 PY 1 U N;
>�c.FL-G�fJ � � ' ' � ' � 7uPT Fh_JCyTt��N OF LOT � UF }'tlE' `�j'IAIY'.�N R7QGl� 1N �'N6. f1A}yGN� ���
iOF l�.A. MR.3'348(MAD Q�.775P� . ClJVNTY OF �OC��41.r�L'�5� t�(p,C��F CA1.1FOfMlA,4=�Y1 �/yP'fJK:''JRf.E.Ci
� . � PAC+�E 3p�,9 OF M�e.:L-LLANFL:'U ��E..�iq�. dN F14f �N ZU� oFF�GE oF7x6 f�m
: � � ' � � � ' ' ' � !+A�D i�OUNTY, ft7GY:�bE�J Ob FOLLOW6 : ' '"'
�NEW�. UNLE7:; NOTE� ��6rIC?INGa�. � P>Elo�NNINC�4T 4frJIKT 14it10 NOfL7NE17LY �IHEOF5A.11� LOT.Ia6TAUT Is,R�L�e
88003
RESOLUTION N0. 2180
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT N0. 88993 TO PERMIT CHARLES
DREW PROJECT HEADSTART AT THE HAM PARK
" COMMUNITY CENTER, 11555 WRIGHT ROAD� LYNWOOD,
CALIFORNIA, IN THE M(MANUFACTURING) ZONE
a
a
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on subject
application for a Conditional Use Permit; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission carefully considered all
x pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing;
�
' Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
= determines that said application for a Conditional Use Permit
- should be approved for the following reasons and findings:
a. The granting of the proposed Conditional Use Permit will
= not adversely affect the General Plan.
I
The proposed use is consistent with the land uses
permitted within the Industrial designation.
�
b. That the proposed location of the conditional use is in
accord with the objectives of this Chapter and the �
purpose of the zone in which the site is located. �
'• The proposed use is ancillary to the primary Community I
Center use.
c. The proposed location of the conditional use and
the conditions under which it would be operated or
maintained will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity.
�
The site can easily accommodate the proposed head start +
program, since the parking is adequate both in size of I
the lot as well as location with respect to the play
area.
d. The proposed conditional use will comply with each
of the applicable provisions of this Chapter. i
The proposed use is consistent with the development I
standards of the Lynwood Municipal Code. �
� ! Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of
Lynwood hereby finds and determines, based upon the i
aforementioned findings, that said Conditional Use Permit should
be approved, subject to the following conditions: �
Community Develo ment Department I
i
I
1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other I
City Departments. I
2. The applicant, or his/her representative, shall sign a
Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read,
understands, and agrees to the conditions within fifteen �
(15) days from the date of approval by the Planning
Commission. �
Disk 10-1:Respo2180 I
�
�
1 j
3. Drinking water must be available on the playground and
in the playrooms.
4. The hours of operation shall be between the hours of
6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
5. All required permits and licenses shall be obtained
prior to operation of the use.
6. Any increase in the play area shall not encroach into
the parking area.
7. The Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void,
if operation does not begin within ninety (90) days after
date of approval by the Planning Commission.
Fire Department
8. Remove file cabinet from northeast exit door.
- 9. Provide smoke detector to ceiling of classroom.
10. Decorative material requires a flame retardant substance
be applied.
I
11. Provide evacuation plan to Fire Department. �
12. Post occupant load sign.
Section 3. A copy of this Resolution shall be delivered to
the applicant.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 8th day of March, 1988, by members
of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
i
AYES: �
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
�
I
�
�
,
Lucille Kan a, Chairperson I
I
I
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: I
I
I
i
Vicente L. Mas, Director General Counsel
' Community Development Dept. I
Disk 10-1:Reso2180 I
I
I
�
2 � �
i
�
� �
"`_. -_ ,� �; � � �� i),�, i � �: f�9 i�� 0. __'�.-.�.�
Cr'15� f����0. ��.�,
DATE: March 8, 1988
T0: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 88004
Applicant: Charles R. Drew Project Head Start
Effie L.. Porth
• 1314 E. Compton Blvd.
Compton, CA. 90221
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to establish
a head start program at 3340 Sanborn Avenue, Lynwood, at the
First Christian Church. The head start program is leasing
classroom space at the church property. In addition, the head
start` program has created two (2) fenced areas for the children
to play. One area has equipment, and is located to the east of
the church building. The second play area is to the rear of the
church, adjacent to the parking lot.
FACTS
1. Source of Authority
;
: Section 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Municipal Code which regulates
the types of uses allowed in a Residentially zoned district.
The site is zoned R-3 (Multi-Family)., The code requires that
a Conditional Use Permit be granted for the proposed use.
2. Property Location
The site is located at 3340 Sanborn Street occupying 3
parcels, the church/head start on the R-3 zoned site; the
parking lot to the south is zoned C-2.
3. Property Size
The church and parking lot occupy approximately 1.5 acres. A
' portion of the site is leased to the Lynwood Unified School
District and houses offices for its unclassified personnel
and is not a part of this proposal.
4. Existing Land Uses
The site, presently occupied by the church, and parking lot is
surrounded by the following land uses:
North: Residential East: Residential
South: Commercial/Parking West: Residential
5. Land Use Description
s General Plan Zoning
North: Commercial R-3
South: Commercial P-1
East: Commercial R-3
� West: Commercial P-1/C-2
DISK 24:88004CUP
:.
:�
6. Project Characteristics
The site is fully developed by the church and parking lot.
The head start program would occupy the existing classrooms
and grounds. The modifications made by head start to
accommodate the children is to fence two (2) separate play
areas. One of the play areas to the east of the main church
building is equipped with playground apparatus on a grassy
area. The other play area is fenced off the parking lot to
the rear. The newly-created play area does not occupy any of
the required parking spaces for the church.
7. Site Plan Review
At its regular meeting of February 18, 1988, the Site Plan
_ Review Committee approved the proposed project, subject to
the conditions and requirements stated in the attached
Resolution.
8. Zoning Enforcement History
None on record.
Analysis and Conclusion
1. Consistency with the General Plan
The proposed land use is consistent with the zoning
classification of R-3; however, the General Plan designation
is Commercial. While the zoning designation is not
consistent with the General Plan land use designation, the
use is consistent, in that, a church use and ancillary
activities and facilities are permitted.
2. Site Suitability:
The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
proposed head start program which would serve a maximum of
120 children in two (2) sessions. The existing parking
facilities easily accommodate the traffic of delivery and
pick-up of children.
3. Compatibility:
The proposed use is considered ancillary to the church use
and would be consistent with the nature and uses of
� surrounding property.
- 4. Compliance with Development Standards
Specific Findings:
a. Granting the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not
adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan.
The proposed use is consistent with the land uses
permitted within the commercial designation.
b. The proposed location of the conditional use is in accord
with the objectives of this Chapter and the purpose of
the zone in which the site is located.
The proposed use is ancillary to the primary church use.
c. That the proposed location of the conditional use and the
conditions under which it would be operated or maintained
will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
�
DZSK 24:68004CUP
' The site can easily accommodate the proposed head start
program, since the parking is adequate both in size of
' the lot as well as location, and is consistent with the
neighborhood.
d. The proposed conditional use will comply with each of the
' applicable provisions of this Chapter.
; The proposed use is consistent with the development
standards of the Lynwood Municipal Code.
5. Conditions of Approval:
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have
a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties
or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or
welfare.
6. Environmental Assessment
, This development is cateqorically exempt from the provisions
of,the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning
Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2181:
� 1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit Case No. 88004,
will not have a significant affect on the environment.
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 88004, subject to
' the stated findings.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. Resolution No. 2181
• 3. Site Plan
DISK 24:88004CUP
88004
� RESOLUTION N0. 2181
`� A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
° THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT N0. 88004 TO PERMIT CHARLES K.
' DREW PROJECT HEADSTART AT THE FIRST
`>.`� CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF LYNWOOD AT 3340
°m SANBORN STREET, LYNWOOD� CA.
' WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on subject
application for a Conditional Use Permit; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission carefully considered all
pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing;
' Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines that said application for a Conditional Use Permit
:- should be approved for the following reasons and findings:
a. The granting of the proposed Conditional Use Permit will
not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan.
The proposed use is consistent with the land uses
permitted within the commercial designation.
b. That the proposed location of the conditional use is in
accord with the objectives of this chapter and the
purpose of the zone in which the site is located. „
The proposed use is ancillary to the primary church use.
c. That the proposed location of the conditional use and
the conditions under which it would be operated or
maintained will not be detrimental to the public
. . health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity.
The site can easily accommodate the proposed head start
program since the parking is adequate both in size of
� the lot as well as location, and is consistent with the
.^ _
neighborhood. '
`? d, That the proposed conditional use will comply with each
of the applicable provisions of this chapter.
The proposed use is consistent with the development
standards of the Lynwood Municipal Code.
r Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of . '
' Lynwood hereby finds and determines, based upon the
'� aforementioned findings, that said Condikional Use Permit should
be approved, subject to the following conditions:
Community Development Department ,
��
'; 1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other
City Departments.
2. The applicant, or his/her representative, shall sign a
; � Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read,
understands, and agrees to the conditions within fifteen
(15) days from the date of approval by the Planning
Commission. • '
cr
Disk 24: Reso2181
';; .
'.Y. . . _ , - � . .
ry
3. Drinking water must be available on the playground and
in the playrooms;
4. The hours of operation shall be 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.;
5. The attached requirements of the Public Works Department
shall be met (Exhibit A).
6. All required permits and licenses shall be obtained
prior to operation of the use.
� 7. The Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become void,
if operation does not begin within ninety (90) days after
"' date of approval by the Planning Commission.
8. Any increase in the play area off the parking lot
requires approval by the Director of Community
Development. Further, increase in the play area shall
not encroach into the required number of parking spaces.
- Fire Department
9 Service all portable fire extinguishers as needed.
s�
10. Provide fire alarm system.
'= 11. Remove car stop on west exit door, gate fence shall open
; full.
x
12. Provide smoke detectors in all classrooms.
13. Remove storage from church attic area, not to be used
for storage.
14. All closet doors (and including all doors) where a child
can enter shall be open from the inside:
, 15. Provide heater guard for all heaters, floor or wall
' units.
16. Submit evacuation plan to Lynwood Fire Dept.
17. Provide exit signs over all exit doors.
� i::
�: 16. All exit doors shall open without any obstruction.
(Free)
19: Provide 1-hr. fire rated corridor to west exit gate or
dedicate a 20 foot,exit way to Mulford Ave.
�`, 20. Decorative material requires a flame retardant substance
be applied.
Section 3. A copy of this Resolution shall be delivered to
the applicant.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 8th day of March, 1968, by members
of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
Disk 24: Reso2181
2
4�
AYES:
. NOES:
ABSENT:
AIISTAIN:
V'
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director General Counsel
Community Development Dept.
:�
DISK 24: Reso2181
�
�`
�: 3
;�
.
LOCATION iVIAP
�: -
` r �— --
�; ' .�; . .�� 'r._ i .... . _. ... ..:,,:..AVE , -^'''..j � EEGHW
a B OOD
. . . .._. . .. ..... �� , : � • �
.. . . . . 'i ' �
o I . ,
�p0 .a� ran . ��� . �n - o�'� I " ' i .
J �o i .' �... W. � Q I'Q° o i ..
.. ' e � - 1� ' � � . > I
. Z . aur . . �_ J� ' .� 1 � Q j � - j
Z\ ,� l � R • . �'� � � ��� � � . O e . . � , J o 2o O p O C
8 z <
M /Ot �
� � - � � . �
� �
.. . � i . . _ � o Q' I .
�2�g � o rei "'9��w .. I
� I
�° ' I
Z\ � bo' y 1 . ' . iwl : : Q _ � ' � .
2 i. � O` - I 1. ______ O . I .
I ' �� . � Q ^ ' I
Z�'. e, )'. o P TF'� lm^ lu I O Z � R. �'OO C
2 x� : �$ 'OO O i� O 'OO ; O e � zav : ze�p
. Q� : � ' 2�8] 28b 2a�5 ` ao ; O � �
� p 2� - 2 � N,i.. � � i.. rirr. �
; _ O Zy2 � ' O;i ' ' , O i p a° � s " I'.
24i � I I i. V � '
I iu,
' 2 �° n / ��.r m .ro � � .ro I eo _ _ ;iao
M i� N '
. yzy _ I ; ' ""' _ . . ' . . ' AVE�.: •. , : SANBORN �
"� N6� .�. mo sa . • so
. SP . i� � � �a. i i
y �
Z q] O w j I
> � I
�. � e � ---- < g O O R I
_ p I
°' � �o — � -- '� O O
e �
?�' zvz zas zqe za
;.�, :� z q6 4 __ sa i
O ? �___ i
. '� _:, Q? qi ___—__ $ J O s I .
- 2�B '� �
.. Z\ 2 �. s � v.. .a , i
2' � ' r r � � a O o i
�� 9 � � 300 t � . . O ` � � ______'� .
i
. !n � 039. .I. y _____` Q ' .
� ' '�� �' � 0302 fuv.. wM1 iPNa... — Z M O � o O O
� .�n '' � � cJ' � _ O � � O ; � 3„ < s
\0' . ' "y 4 � �r�• 3al �. � 342 : 343' O __' -- i .
. 3 tJ j0? r � ;,___—_— � I
,;� � - j�y;. , '. ���:. fm3 e �,::� � E Q o �
n 3���� ' � � . C - tl E � i
.on '"I;, . . .. 3�� e.r`\ + 10 ao � so
�3' : . roa
;u v�.a . � 'O � ]01 .,.� .� - . .. ���AVE. . o ' .
'\. ,L,. �. 3p 0 ° ' , ;?b�•r S ' �MU ORD
. ��):'-• ; ..� � � � F �PO `}o . :e �� .z. eo � eo �°` ,
• M � i e ^
O . " ) �� S' ' . :y� ry E p0 `�M1 1 I � 1 a �' i • O O 0
. ,�u =-� �� ^ `� ' "x .i i i k g r '____'_ .
�
��'�. . �r" �a,.`.�c����10 g N W I ' p n 363 � h 362 � 4
L'�
�
R.
�
C
�
..
k:
K
C
T
f ` n� �
� L��L� I
{ _
�.' , . �.. _ . _.
- _ � _ . . . , . ' . ' ' ' � ..� .
,� , , � , - Y: :� .� \ :
w �'�'
P` °
, . ' �.y...e.�:..do � i.�
w . \ 'c7 �,.. {' ;
l � '` . ���, ` .r � r 11 i; �� � '.
"� 1l 11 `. .� 1 '�,��. �
}; { N„�
�.
�.00ltd.�- ' Y� `�
.J . �;.� �
- � / �. \ : r- �:
17 C'� �..� .......� ..� .... .. _.� � _ .....,.__.,W.....1.{L......._..._. - ' '
~� • � M I`1,Yo'�G. It)'�' ��� I9X�� I`i�t'Id' ;
:':., , _ . , ,ti,i.n , .,
',; . ^j +1/'lt `i�,� �7/ �' 1 1.�..� �! ..
I �'
� ' r%v' ��.�i N'71^_. ; ! � .'� . r . . .
i / : , . J �� �� :' f • - ,.
i �,. � • �
! �� � S.S/ ��./
j �s�� ,, � �
. .,�.,._X °�r' ti:';�tk'.t'. �i,c1...�,•
' K C��slcr l � C�.. '- �tl
,; ��,r���.
:��.�5. ot=F�ce, I U r �,,�,. ' � .�"
-.� M � . I.3r �..��.t,�:i1�
�
<; .,:;.;.
�,. � �. hM+wT�w� ..
,;; � ��onryli . ` 9.� C,
x � ' �"."' , f�l..�iy F'tre.� ^, '�
!,. � , '. __ �
� . ; �:: _� , . l: ..
�.� .,.. . .
� 13ey i �a�� �'i I ' .
� ' P,.;�,oc�n N�:;lrtt.N� � ' n..�.,o.e..
•� Q' 1
µ j ; ,.� , , � :> y
v t, ,_ � a .
_ � , J ; 1-Inl_1.,�/fly �F, .F_ c� , )
�' .� , - ,> � -,�-
, . � �,. �.;r:�
�...._.... ' ' .� �;_ .. �
> , c:. = �
:;: ��.
.,- : , ,
G�a r '
- �
.
p ,...
y�,, Ti -. ',,' �
.' S �r �'� <. . i , . >` >
ti
�, !` � . .
_.,.�....-�..,.�._--�.! .
�;' �,, ..r.;
.i r
�..
T.
� c,.
:; . � ^ ii,. � .
:7 Ch urc,�r-� _ _..�..::
, /.
__....._-.-.�-...�...._.�.�._.�..--.... � � i
. • _"__,.__
� . . ' ... ' .
.
. � I < I �, tW.�l���... . ..,_« .._ ..... . .. � ,....�.
� ........ ....
_�..�., .
; .� ; �
w >� ��
' C siARLES R. DREW PROJECT HEAD ST�R�' '
3340 SANBORN ST., LYNVd70D„CA. � rl r� '�; :�,:I r..'. rF', :� ,,.,�--'�`_. ,'
� �� �
MAiLING ADDRESS:��/le�t�.vY�`+'�� S/4'�.ho�., If� � c
� 7314 E. CCP4P'ION N. C-§__-- - ,-�
�
�
�
i: .
� ..
F
k
�
�
E
� � �
� ���
. .. . . . � ' ���_o � �: :"� '�— . :
� �'' _ � - � � � � � .,. � . . � : '; � . . ----^-°"� .
1i .
� . . . , � �yl n�' . �
, � �6� J ���. 1 `� l.� . __-_.__ -__a e o i .' o _'_°"
;; - ,
DATE: , February 9, 1988
T0; PLANNING COMMISSION �..
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director.
' Communfty Development Department `
�= SUBJECT: Request for Extension of Tentative Parcel Map No. 17149
Applicant: Billy Hisey �
, PROPOSAL:
. The applicant is requesting a six month extension of Tentative
Parcel Map No. 17149 on a subdivision located at 11561 Virginia
Avenue, Lynwood, California.
FACTS:
1. Source of Authority.
Section 66452.6, Subdivision Map Act and Section 25-18
of the Lynwood Municipal Code state that a'Tentative Parcel
Map may be extended by the Advisory Agency (Pianning
•Y. Commission).
, Y 2. Property Location.
, The subject property consists of three (3) lots on the west
side of Virginia Avenue, between [dalnut and Cortland `
Avenues. (See Location Map) °
3. Property Size. ,
The subject is rectangular in shape wiEh a total area of
approximately 25,422 sq. ft.
: 4. Existing Land Use.
The property is presently vacant. The surrounding land uses
are as follows:
North - Two-Family Res. East - Two- Family Res.
f `
South - Two-Family Res. West - Commercial '
;
5. Land Use Designation
�. The General Plan de'signation for the subject property is
Townhouse & Cluster Housing, and the zoning classification
? is, R-2 (Townhouse & Cluster Housing. The surrounding land
" uses are as follows:
f .
9
Disk 10-1:88010ext
<, .
i; � - . , � • � ' . , ' . . . � . . ...
General Plan: Zoning:
North - Townhouse & Cluster North - R-2 •
`� .
° Housing
f�' South - Townhouse & Cluster South - R-2
Housing ,
East - Townhouse & Cluster East -,R-2 ,
p „ Cluster Housing
o , e
, West - Commercial West - C-3
6. Project Characteristics:
�, The applicant proposed to build four, two-bedroom apartments
and six (6) three-bedroom apartments. Each apartment will
' have two (2) bathrooms. On-site laundry facilities and
�'� storage areas were to be provided. On August 13, 1985 a
s Conditional Use Permit was approved by the Planning Commis- '
sion. However, to date, the apartments have not been,built. �
, 4
� The developer now is requesting a six-month extension ' of
Tentative Parcel Map No. 17149, as the map will expire'
February 13, 1988. Because of economic factors, the
subdivider will be able to complete the project before
August 13, 1988; therefore, an extension of six months is
�being requested.
8 � . . .. . , . .. . -
�; If approved, this will be the second extension granted to
• the applicant. '
7. Site Plan Review
At its regular meeting on February 18, 1988, the Site Plan_
;: Review Commmittee approved the proposed extension without
t' °,. additional conditions being imposed.
8. Zoning Enforcement History
None'of record. -
=t ' � � � � � •
9. Public Response
No protests'have been received as of the time of preparation
of the Agenda. "
; ', .
; ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
1. 'Consistency with General Plan
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning
desiqnation (R-2) and consistent with the General Plan
`> ,,
` designation (TOwnhouse and Cluster Housing). � _
2: Site Suitability -
° , The property. is adequate in size and to accommodate
the proposed development relative to structures, parking,
walls, fences, landscaping, driveways and other development`
; features required by the Zoning Ordinance.
'�
" ✓Disk'10-1:88010ext
>: .
..
.J . . . ' ' . . .
3. Compatibility
- The �proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of
high and medium density residential developments; therefore,
the project will be compatible with the development in the area.
'= 4. Compliance with Development Standards
z` .
� The proposal does meets the development standards-
`� required by the Zoning Ordinance with respect to front,
side, and rear yard setbacks; distance between structures;
lot coverage; building height; and-density.
,� 5. Conditions of Approval
,
- The improvements as proposed, subject to the co
recommended by the Site.Plan Review Committee, will not have
a negative effect on the values of the surroundinq •
. properties or interfere with or endanger the public health,
safety or welfare. �
;
6, �Environmental Assessment
This extension is exempt from the provisions of the State
' CEQA Guidelines, as amended {Section 15061, (b)(3)]. :
�. .
�
;; RECOMMENDATION:
,
Staff, respectfully requests that after consideration the Planning ' -
'�, Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2178:
'�. � a. Finding that an extension of Tentative Parcel Map No.,
17149 will not have a significant affect on the
>' environment. ,.
, � b. Approving a six-month extension of Tentative Parcel Map' ""
, No. 17149 to August 13, 1988.
;' ,
Attachments . °
:Y. Location Map �
� 2. Resolution No. 2178
� .
.
, .
Disk 10-1:88010ext
. aaoio
9 � � .. ' ' � . .
z . . . .. � - ' .
RESOLUTION N0. 2178
3',
' A RSSOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD GRANTING AN
- � EXTENSION OF SIX MONTHS FOR TENTATIVE
` PARCEL MAP N0. 17149 ON PROPERTY
' LOCATED AT 11561 VZRGINIA AVENUE,
' LYNWOOD, CA., IN THE R-2 (T440-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL) ZONE.
<
. PIHEREAS, the Plahning Commission, did, pursuant to law,
hold a public hearing on an extension relative to subject
- Tentative Parcel Map; and -
WHEREAS, the developer's request to extend subject map
was filed in a timely manner; and
WHEREAS, one six-month extension has heretofore been
granted'• •
'" Section 1. The Planning 'Commission of the City of
� Lynwood hereby finds and determine as follows:
A. The work to be done by the subdivider is incomplete;_�
and an extension is necessary to complete the
' proposed project. ,
B. , The project will not adversely affect the General
Plan, as the subject property is designated
' ` "Townhouse and Cluster Housing."
, . Section,2. The Planning Commission does hereby qrant an.
extension of six (6) months -- February 13, 1988 to August 13,
1988--for Tentative Parcel Map No. 17149.
Section 3.. No grading or building permits will be issued
antil recordation of tHe Final Map.
" • Section 4. The Community Development Department has
deterinined that the extension of Tentative Parcel.Map 17149 is
; , categorically exempt from the provisions of the 5tate CEQA
Guidelines, as amended (Section 15061 b(3).
Section 4. A certified copy of this resolution shall be '
delivered to the applicant. �
,
Disk 10-1:Reso2178
:j . .
s ' APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of March, 1988, by the ,'
� members _of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
�; , � , '
�4:;. . � ` ' . .. ➢.
;: AYES: .
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
:� . ,
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
�
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: .
� ' �� � � � . �
�
:. . .
Vicen L. Mas, Director ,
Community Development Dept: General Counsel
';
�� ' � . � � � , '
,: .
� p � � .
1 �
k . - ' . � . ' � ' _
� ' ^ . . � . _ � . . . , . '
r � ' � . . - . � � �
. . . . . . . . . . . .. . ..
, Disk 10-1:Reso2178 �
y "
.. .. . . . . ..... _. . .. ... ..: .... ....., _........ ... �.i....za. ... . .. . . , .rt t , a. , i la a . s... r a Y K
, .. . .. ...� ..._. .... � v... .
. . _ . , e .'-..: : . �'..t. ...v� .. ° ,.. . � .:. -d...
. _.. . '. . - . . . .. . . . .. � . ' ,.. , . . . " . . . .. .. . .. . ' .S
S
. . � . . . . .. . .. , . . . . . . . - , �{ '.�:. ..
, .� ... . � . ��...� ' � .. :. . '' . .. .. . ., � . '' ,� ,. _ ' ..:. .. � .. ... -�� ..L � ,
i
. . � � . ._, . ��. r ...� '._ . . � 1 .
. , . . ' , . .__- _ .. :- � ' ' . S ., .\� 5 .�..., ., ., i , y . . . . I .
. 1 � �_ ' �.. �„u { .�.. ♦ I � � .,� � . • t .
1 I
. . , �. . .. n . . . . `.� r . . .. . v� r 4 -.. k � • � �� . ; ..
. � '
� :
. - . � . O ` 'r.. . __. . ___ � .-. � v _ I -e• ' _ • 9 y ( }. � i � �� +' .. { .
. .� L . . �ur . �. � +'0. '1 n .
- ' � [, �� � . V 1 y 1 � I��� ; i T e �j I '+ � � v..� .
. —a l � i _ _` .
, II ,,, _ c� �..----- F --�--- . : � - . ' � > � - � ` - f
. C . �� ♦ Q � _I ♦ . `� i i�: �' , t u � � .�;5..� I � .�- �� . � . ,
. . O ', ' �� .` � .__.� 4 �1 _ '�.. I _� r.. , f ,•�— �. .1�_, i .t { �-� . ___. . . � .
� - . . i - _ I w I Jf V .. �' . , � �
. ,
.
. ,
' -�}-�^- r J
.
� , � � I _' t . _. 1 . . . _ __.'_ ' . � ... �� `_. . _ . .
1 � � ` � � I �� I � ` ' � { t . . ,'� I �, .) � '. �
� � .
� � � � � . _ . i _ . _. . ' ' _ l
. . � . I � • 7 '�� � . : I `
. � ; 0 .� _ ) • �
� , ' ,�—: �.. _ � : � • ; � I • � �;� ' _ � � --v �° � __� ; �i i r r` �
.. � �' . � .� -�� I . : " . ,, - a � . . �.'? O
, � . � :,1-.4-r �4ie- � �, �..�;' � � ,. . P`T - . • � •. i '�rsr�- � - r.'N�H�s - ; - �, �, . � _ � -
� T'rT�Trl'r'T''f"T1�1 • �• • �� + - .
� � � ` � �.� j � c }� o � �, �, , {/��
: I � alC t'.; ...w y �. �. `lo ��� � a 3 v i I:ga.. � w��c �� � I � w \/ . ..
� � � I ��� � � �
n.l� 1.Llt I I 1. I + fI �1�1L1J � ��%� • I �I . I`i I vl � I I.
I � � y
� �rtAVnc � `
• •r�Jlrrn��•':��tni�ro^r�mlplr�_�.� .c i�.TT -'i�-�-��ir:��- a � ��.�-.�. :�. ;� �"��� �y � ` . ..
. T � O
�. ' ., .. . �� L ' .���1I�� r � � .�` �•� ^ 4 ` j 2 1 uJ 4 ''.��.� � � w N�� a � �
[ 1 I �0 �) i 7 6 3� 1 7 [ I� 1 1 . � 1 I 10 9 8 �; � 6: .'� F' I
:�.4' I:t.J. . �:I�Il[6 't lL!!r. L � �4 ��4'1J U � ' iy!yL' (�� .
'� r . � — . ; s� . . _ '��,
o �.'♦ G I�L�21 _O� i9 IA �17 o , ' u� � lil�� :5��: S♦ 33 T 52 ti� ... ^� � ( R C ,� .
. .
� � : j � , l u W ; � /
I I :
- ^I.... � �LL_.1� � !,..\ � ':: i. ':: ``� i � ♦ � � � . . .� .
, � .., �:, . _ �__ — . '., ,. .�vE rb � K . { �
VIflGIN1A E ,•_� � „ "• , a , ,
.. .. 1 � f��' '�i "i i u (i: . � �S�II �"r�r'0'T :r �� r A �. - . � �
,� �. ' �� I T � ; • V n �, �i • ' . �` • • .. . '
t0 �� S��.S/'' 6.J3 ]♦�71�32�A � 2� b�.61�61;5Z & fi0; 39 �i• u . .
.. L�! I.��J1��'L._�__�L__i�—i!'..••L r�. ! . . . . � � . . - .
..�-.� -,.r — :.r . � �.—.- r I. � 2 7] � 72�I TI � TD, 69 68 67' - 6. `�i' a . . _ . . . . .
� .N� 52�31 30 �9 �B N 96� S t1 ♦ J,. .I � j . . . � Z��/ � . . ° , .
� , 4 � T r . ��J
£: I � _ _�� s ( � � � � �� I � � ^ � � .
1 V
` i ' )� I � �N L / V .�� �' /J/,\ .. . �
( �_...1� J _._L .L�_ ��.• i r ,
1. _ •
� POPE E� E .. , _ ,.. �v£ E �o � ° .
' -7 -r--�-r:: �
� <.L� J t, . . . .
r�: � � - i �� j � T ='- i � r. �S� ( - .:� I . . . �� U ',O . . . .
�' � � I ... : . 9 ; I . s ,.. � �
Q � . � . • d2 � i 30 ; 9 7� 77 lo J 7S �` 7♦ . S . � Zj ' . . . . . . .
+� '.d - .6r I o S�i aS o2 ll A'S7 "9 2 Sf�' d � . � . . . �,�:.r . . . . . . � . . .
. . -a_ . � . �. "i... (, 91', i0� 89.. � i7 Hi �� 13 ;,�7�,.83 � s ro . . .
4
T r �� ,--. � - 7 -= • - r � ;. . ; ; _ r, ,�
� � ��_ . . . . .o
IG 9 I^A�I 7� A �� a i a o - � i . I . . . � � . � l. :_ . . - . . . - . .. , . . . .
,_;___ .
. . ���.-- _
. ;'. t `�,'' .
:�:, �. _ 9.--
,
� :,
';,��,,;.. i d ,.. _._.�..__._. ssoo6
' DATE: March 8, 1988
T0: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Proposed amendment to Chapter 25, the official Zoning
Ordinance, modifying current density bonus provisions
Purpose:
� Proposed amendment to establish regulations to allow density
'' bonuses of twenty-five (258) percent above the basic density in
exchange for superior and unique developments in the multiple-
family residential zones. I
5 Background• I
c.
In an attempt to stimulate the private construction of sorely
needed affordable housing throughout California, the State
Legislature created the "Density Bonus" program in October, 1979,
' by amending the Planning and Zoninq Law to add Sections 65915-
65918 to the Government Code. This state involvement into local I
housing affairs, made mandatory on all local governments,
including charter cities, required local jurisdictions to grant
at least a 25 percent increase in the otherwise allowable land
use density for developments consisting of at least five dwelling
units.
The heart of the density bonus law is still found in Government �
Code Section 65915. That section now provides that local I
� jurisdictions must either grant a"density bonus" (defined as a �
"density increase of at least 258 over the otherwise maximum I
allowable residential density under the applicable zoning
ordinance and land use element of the General Plan") or "provide
. other incentives of equivalent financial value." I
Source of Authoritv �
Government Code Section 65915-65918; Civil Code Sections 51.2 and I
51.3
Section 25-4.5 of the Lynwood Municipal Code
Facts
1. The purpose of the density bonus is to provide a greater I
number of amenities and aesthetic features without i
diminishing the overall development. The concept is intended '
to provide more flexibility and creativity in the development �
of relatively large parcels. i
2. The current regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code �
provide that a density bonus may be granted for each I
increment of 6,000 square feet above the minimum lot size I
established for any R-2 or R-3 zone, as an incentive for I
merging smaller parcels into one large lot. Also additional
dwelling units may be permitted in the R-2 and R-3 zones as I
incentives toward providing low and moderate income housing
at the rate of thirty (308) percent above the basic density.
Disk 10-1:Density2 �
�
1
�
�
„.. .
; .
` 3. The proposed amendment would repeal the density bonus for
large lot developments, and restate and modify those
provisions for a density bonus relating to affordable housing
for low and moderate income households, including senior
citizens.
' 4. Moreover, the proposed amendment would decrease the density
:; bonus in the Lynwood Municipal Code for low and moderate
income households from thirty (308) percent to twenty-five
(258) as required by state law.
5. The ordinance amendment requires that density bonus
� developments must possess special or unique designs for the
granting of a density greater than 25$ above the otherwise
allowable density.
, Issues and Analysis
1. The proposed ordinance reflects changes in State legislation
affecting the density bonus program. For example, the length
of continuing availability has been accommodated by reducing
_ the minimum time period for which dwelling units must be
reserved for low and/or moderate income persons or senior
citizens from 30 years to a 10-year period, with the
, exception of projects which have a direct financial
contribution by local governments.
r
. 2. State law now provides that, in those instances where a
density bonus of 25$ must be granted, local jurisdictions
have the discretion to provide, in lieu of such density
increase, "other incentives of equivalent financial value.”
The proposed ordinance has been amended to conform with this
change in state law.
, 3. Despite the apparent mandatory language, this amendment does I
provide local governments the wide discretion to determine
whether a project reserving 258 or the total number of I
dwelling units for persons of "lower income household" should I
be granted a density bonus or incentives. If it is determined
that granting the density bonus or other incentives would
have a substantial adverse impact upon the public health or �
safety, the local agency is free not to grant them. i
4. The proposed ordinance also reflects changes pertaining to
senior citizen housing. The state legislature incorporated
certain senior citizen housing developments to the list of
instances where local jurisdiction are obliged to grant a
density bonus or approve other incentives of equivalent
financial value. The draft ordinance has been prepared to add
this statutory addition for senior citizen housing
developments.
5. In the event the ordinance is adopted, the density �
bonus/incentives would only be allowed in exchange for I
special or unique proposals that justify such a density bonus
as a means to enhance, rather than diminish the general health
and welfare. I
I
I
Disk 10-1:Density2 I
I
I
I
. 2 �
Examples of special or unique proposals may include significant
and substantial amenities in the proposed development, and/or
other aesthetic features such as:
a. Useable open space per dwelling unit;
b. Off-street parking provided from other than a major or
minor highway where feasible, i.e., side street
access;
c. Subterranean parking
d. Play area
'i e. Decks, gazebos
f. Swimming p000l, spa, jacuzzi
g. Other recreational facilities
h. Lush landscaping which exceeds the minimum
� requirements
i. Building proposals exhibiting exceptional design
quality and innovation.
The basic intent of the density bonus amendment is to create,
preserve, and enhance residential areas for a full range of
housing types and income levels.
!F
�
Recommendation
� Staff respectfully requests that, after considertion, the
h Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2171:
i
" a. Finding that the proposed amendment is exempt from the
' provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended.
b. Recommending that the City Council approve the findings in
Resolution No. 2171, waive reading and introduce the proposed
ordinance.
Attachments:
, '
1. Resolution No. 2171 �
2. Draft ordinance
i
I
. ,
: I
I
, '
I
i
�
I
�
Disk 10-1:Density2 I
;
i
�
I
i
3
;ti
ORDINANCE N0.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD AMENDING CHAPTER 25� THE OFFICIAL ZONING
ORDINANCE� WITH RESPECT TO DENSITY BONUSES IN THE
MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES
;;
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
!!
" SECTION 1. Sections 25-4.5 b 7 and 25-4.5 b 8 are hereby
'� deleted in their entirety.
SECTION 2. Section 25-4.5b is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"b. Special Requirements ,
5
"7. Part 1. - Density Bonus.
�; a. In order to encourage the provision of housing for
'' low-and moderate-income households and senior
citizens, an applicant for a project in the
multiple residential zones may request and the
Planning Commission shall grant, with appropriate
findings, an increase of twenty-five percent (25�)
above the highest density of the applicable I
General Plan residential category, if the project
` complies with one or more of the following:
,-,>;
1. At least twenty-five (25$) percent of the I
'' total units in the project are restricted to
the rental or purchase by persons and families ,
of low-and moderate-income, or, �
�
2. At least fifty percent of the total dwelling
units in a housing development are for persons
62 years of age or older, or 55 years of age
or older in a senior citizen housing
development.
b. Density bonus units may be granted subject to the
` following conditions:
�'r'
1. The housing development shall consist of five I
- (5) or more dwelling units.
" 2. Prior to issuance of any zone clearance
related to the project, the developer shall �
enter into an Agreement, the contents of which
shall include, but not be limited to, unit �
' price, phasing, outreach methods, deed
restrictions and sale of units to non-target �
income households, financing, and other '
affordability methods. I
- 3. Required affordable units shall be provided
I
equally within each development.
' I
; Disk 10-1:Densord j
(
I
. I
1 I
4. The developer shall undertake an outreach
program for the purpose of notifying potential
target income households of the availability
of affordable units. Said program shall be in
. a form and of a duration acceptable to the
City.
5. There shall be no physical differentiation
between required affordable and other units,
including exterior treatment and design.
6. That the developer shall contract with the Los
Angeles County Housing Authority or an
organization approved by the City of Lynwood
to screen potential buyers and tenants to
ensure that they meet target income group
criteria.
7. If federal, state, county or city funds are I
utilized such agreement shall comply with the
appropriate regulations.
8. The certificate of occupancy for a density bonus
, unit shall automatically expire upon vacation of
the unit. Prior to the reissuance of a
certificate of occupancy for the unit, the
Director of Community Development shall determine i
" that it will be occupied pursuant to the I
s requirements of this Chapter.
c. As an alternative, or in addition to awarding a I
A density bonus, the Commission may elect to grant
, other incentives, which may include variations to
. the development standards contained in Section 25-
4.5 of this chapter.
;
8. Part 2- Density Bonus - Additional Provisions
In addition to the provisions contained in Part
1, an application for a density bonus shall
%
also comply with the following provisions:
? Application -- Contents. An application for a
density bonus shall contain the following �
additional and/or documents:
1. The total number of dwelling units proposed;
and
2. The number of dwelling units designated for
low and/or moderate income residents or
senior citizens; and
3. The amount of bonus or type of incentives of
equivalent financial value, if requested, to ,
• the grant of a density bonus; and ,
�
4. A map indicating the locations of dwelling �
units intended for low and/or moderate income I
residents or senior citizens, and further I
indicating which units are for rental and
which are for sale, if combined in the same
proposal; and I
Disk 10-1:Densord ,
i
i
i
�
2
i
5. A draft agreement suitable for recordation in
` the office of the County Recorder of Los
Angeles County, as a covenant running with the
land, for the benefit of the City of Lynwood,
indicating the number of dwelling units as
specified by subsection bl and b2 of this
section and also specifying the number of
years that said dwelling units will be
continuously available for use by low and/or
moderate income persons or senior citizens.
- The means proposed to insure the continuing
availabilty of dwelling. Units designated for
low and/or moderate housing shall be effective
- for a period of not less than 10 years, unless
z; the Planning Commission approves a different
time period.
The agreement shall include, among other
things, the following provisions:"
a. The developer shall give the City the
continuing right-of-first refusal to
purchase or lease any or all of the
designated units at the fair market
value.
Y
b. The deeds to the designated units shall
contain a covenant stating that the
developer or his/her successor in
interest shall not sell, rent, lease,
sublet, assign, or otherwise transfer any
interests for same without the written
- approval of the City confirming that the
sales price or rental schedule of the
units is consistent with the limits
established for low-and-moderate-income
households and senior citizens, which
shall be related to the Consumer Price
Index.
c. The City shall have the authority to
enter into such other agreements with the
developer and with the renters or
purchasers of the dwelling units, as may
be necessary to assure that the required
dwelling units are continuously occupied
by eligible households.
6. The market rental rates, purchase sale prices
whichever are appropriate, for dwelling units
of comparable size and type within the market
area of the subject property.
>
c. Notification of Housing Authority.
The Community Development Department shall refer a
copy of the application for a density bonus to the
, Executive Director of the Los Angeles County
Housing Authority for review and comment. The
Executive Director shall review such application,
and may submit comments and recommendations
'•` concernin such
g proposed low and/or moderate
' income housing as is deemed appropriate.
i
' Disk 10-1:Densord I
3
.
�
SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY.
If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,
� clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance, or the
application thereof to any person or place, is for any
reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
. decision of any court or competent jurisdiction, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
� portions of this ordinance or its application to other
persons or places.
, The City Council hereby declares that it would have
adopted this ordinance, and each section, subsection,
` subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion
, thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or
portions, or the application thereof to any person or
place, be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City
held on the day of , 1988, and
finally adopted and ordered published at a meeting
of said Council held on the day of ,
- 1988, by the following vote:
,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
' ABSTAIN:
PAUL R. RICHARDS II
' MAYOR
ATTEST: �
I
�
ANDREA HOOPER i
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
i
Vicente L. Mas, Director I
Community Development Dept. General Counsel �
I
Disk 10-1:Densord I
�
4 i
�
�
,�._ �c'
� • ,
RESOLUTION N0. 2171
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
" THE CITY OF LYNWOOD. RECOMMENDING CITY
COUNCIL ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO
CHAPTER CHAPTER 25, THE OFFICIAL ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE LYNWOOD MUNZCIPAL CODE,
WITH RESPECT TO DENSITY BONUSES IN THE
MULTIPLE FAPIILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES.
Whereas, the Planning Commission pursuant to law,
conducted a public hearing pertaining to an amendment to the
official zoning ordiance with respect to density bonuses in
multiple family residential zones.
Whereas, the Planning Commission has carefully
- Iconsidered all pertinent testimony offered in the case, as
presented at the public hearing;
Whereas, this resolution with Findings and
recommendations contained herein, shall constitute the report of
the Planning Commission to the City Council;
_ Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of
Lynwood does hereby resolve, find and conclude that the proposed
amendment to the Zoning Ordinance should be adopted by the City
Council for the following reasons and findings:
' A. The amendment is in keepinq with the goals and
policies of the General Plan;
B. The amendment will provide flexibility and
creativity in the design of multiple family
residential developments.
; C. The amendment will enhance residential development
_ activities of the City. I
D. The amendment will create a stimulus for developers i
to propose and to develop a full range of I
residential housing types and income levels.
Section 2. The Community Development Department has
determined that the proposed amendment, as set forth herein, wiil
not have a substantial effect upon the environment to require a
Negative Declaration under the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act, as amended; as the proposal is exempt
from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of March, 1988, by
the members of the Planning Commission voting as f�llows:
�
AYES: I
NOES:
ABSENT: I
ABSTAIN: I
i
� I
I
I
I
Disk 10-1:Reso2171 i
�
I
�
I
1
.- < . � . . , .
�"
. Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
r -
.�
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director General Counsel •
Community Development Department
e �
::�
:;;
.,
'-;"=,
Disk 10-l:Reso2171
2
�
i ; - ;:.. s•,, i``', �1 I"►' f; !t r� I (1
,
f'.�:i!_.���a; � { o �..��� �v`J.......�....���-,�...-�..�
` ��,;- (_�;� 87108
; ,
' 'tiJl- ��,��/ .. . ...
� .� . _ . ._._.._..__........�,r-*r; �^.�
DATE: March 8, 1988
T0: PLANNING COMMISSION
_ FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
- Community Development Dept.
, SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT —CASE N0. 87108
Applicant: Rod Nourafshan
The applicant applied for conditional use permit approval
in order to operate an automobile repair center at 12534
Atlantic Avenue, Lynwood, CA. The applicant has now
determined that the proposal is not economically feasible;
therefore, he has withdrawn his application.
However, this decision came after the legal notice for
this application was already published. Therefore, the
Community Development Director is required. to place
this item on the.agenda.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that this item be withdrawn from the
Planning Commission agenda.
I
I
. �
I
�
i
I
I
I
� i
�
�
I
I
Disk 25:ROdnitr i
I
i
�
I
i
I
,
i
. -
(
i .
r � !'' �.1 L`. r'� �.�� i� L �'i� �� iJ. ��
; l��'IJ1� l � 88002
DATE: March 8, 1988
T0: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Dept.
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP CASE N0. 88002
Applicant: McDonald's Corporation
This item involves merging several lots into one parcel
in order to build a McDOnald's Restaurant with drive-
through service. Now, the applicant has considered the
possibility of selling one of the parcels, thereby
necessitatinq a new site plan and Tentative Parcel Map.
However, this decision came after the legal notice for
this application was already published. Therefore, the
Community Development Director is required to place
this item on the agenda.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that this item be continued to the
' next regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
April 12, 1988.
�
I
�
i
, i
I
I
i
I
,
i
� ;
I
�
�
I
. �
�
i
�
. �
�
;
Disk 25:Mcdltr
I
i
�
�