HomeMy Public PortalAboutA 1988-02-09 PLANNING COMMISSION .. ...
AGENDA
LY�WOOD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING'— 7:30 P. M. � /� 1 � -,
LYNWOOD CITY HAI.L, 11330 BULLIS ROAD � ��� �
( � � � � 0 � � � I
�) CITY OF LYNlN00D
��`ti CITY CLERKS OFFICE
. � I � , ��' � FFB 0 � 1988
W'" 0 A � P �
� 7 i 8 i 9il0illi12�1i2�3i4i5i6.
'�COMP�ISSIONERS
I�y � ��
LUCILLE KANKA !�/�� �
����ERSON �� y � -� � �
DONALD DOVE ROY PRYOR
VICE-CHAIRPERSON COMMISSIONER
LENA COLE DENNIS EUGENE RAY�"IOND
COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER
ALBERTQ NDNTOYA PENALEER DAV ID J, W I LL I S, J R,
COMMISSZONER COMMISSIONER
CITY STAFf
DIRECTOR OF COMM[JNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNERS
VICENTE L. MAS Dorethea Tilford
Acting Senior Planner
COMMISSION COUNSEL
Henry S. Barbosa
Douglas D. Barnes
''#:
FEBRUARY 9, 1988
OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Call meeting to order.
B. Flag Salute.
C. Roll Call.
D. Certification of Agenda posting
E. Approval of Minutes of January 12, 1988
CONTINUED PUHLIC HEARINGS:
1. Conditional Use Permit Case No. 87097
4271 Carlin Avenue (Teresita Valdez)
Comments•
The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval
to re-open a convalescent hospital in the R-3 (Multiple
Family Residential) zone.
This matter was continued from the January 12, 1988
Planninq Commission meeting in order that the applicant
would be able to submit certain documents with respect to
the administration of the facility and applicant's track
record. Additionally, the Planning Commission directed
legal counsel to investigate and report on the terms and
conditions of probation imposed on the property owner by the
court.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission continue this case to the meeting of
March 8, 1988, in order to allow staff and legal counsel an
opportunity to obtain the required information, or adopt
Resolution No. 2158:
a. Finding that re-opening the facility would not have a
significant effect on the environment and certify the
Neqative Declaration as adequate.
b. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 87097, subject to
stated conditions and requirements.
2. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87095
3156 Euclid Avenue (Robert Roqers)
Comments•
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to
operate a group residential facility--"Teen Challenge"--in
the R-3 (MUltiple-Family Residential) zone. This matter
was continued from the January 12, 1988 Planning Commission
meeting at the request of the applicant, in order to revise
the site plan.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2160:
V10:Agenda
a. Finding that Conditional Use Permit No. 87095 is exempt
from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as
amended.
b. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 87095, subject to
stated conditions and requirements.
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS:
3. Tentative Parcel Map--Case No. 87103
Alameda & Butler Avenues (Davis Development)
Comments:
The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Parcel
Map to combine several lots in the Manufacturing (M) zone.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2166:
a. Finding that Tentative Parcel Map No. 19054, Case
No. 87103 will not have a significant effect on
the environment, and certify the Negative
Declaration as adequate.
b. Approving Tentative Parcel Map, Case No. 87103,
subject to stated conditions and requirements.
3a. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87103
Alameda St./Butler Avenue (Davis Development)
Comments:
The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval
to build a 304,200 sq. ft. warehouse at subject address in
the Manufacturing (M) zone.
Recommended Action:
Staff respectfully request that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2169:
a. Finding that Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 87103,
could not have a significant effect on the
environment; and certify the Negative Declaration as
adequate.
b. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 87103, subject to
stated conditions and requirements.
4. Modification of Conditional Use Permit No. 86093
Case No. 87105 - 11132-34 Long Beach Boulevard
(Richard Engel)
Comments•
The applicant is requesting approval of a Modification to
Conditional Use Permit No. 86093, to allow Eddie Jr.'s mini-
market to sell beer and wine at shopping center. A permit
was granted for the proposed use last year.
V10:Agenda
0
i
Recommended Action
Staff respectfully request that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2170:
a. Finding that Modification Case No. 87105 will not have
a significant effect on the environment, and the
environmental evaluation completed for Case No. 86093
is adequate for subject Modification.
b. Approving Modification Case No. 87105, subject to the
stated conditions and requirements.
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS
1. Appeal of Conditions for C.U.P. Approval - Case No. 87072
Comments•
On January 12, 1988, the Planning Commission approved C.U.P.
No. 87072 allowinq for the development of eight (8) units.
Pursuant to policy, applicant was required to build a block
wall fence around the perimeter of the property (Condition
No. 9 in Resolution No. 2148). Applicant has requested that
this condition be waived, and that he be allowed to build a
wood fence instead (See attached letter).
Recommendation:
Staff respectfully recommends that the Planning Commission
uphold their decision requiring the block wall fence.
2. Discussion Item -- Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment:
Density Bonus/Incentives for Multiple Family Residential
Developments.
STAFF COMMENTS
1. Staff reorganization.
2. Amendment No. 3 to Redevelopment Project Area "A" -
Status Report.
3. Planning Commission/Staff Workshop.
COMMISSION ORALS
PUBLIC ORALS
(information items only)
ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the next regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on March S, 1988, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall
Council Chambers, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California.
V10:Agenda
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
• PLANNING COMMISSION
'<;;�;' CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA
- TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 1988
OPENING CEREMONIES
A. Call to Order
A regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of
Lynwood was called to order by Chairperson Kanka on the
above-captioned date at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of
the Lynwood City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood,
California, 90262. -
B. Pledae of Alleaiance
Commissioner pove led the Pledge of Allegiance.
C. Roll Call of Commissioners
Chairperson Kanka requested the roll call, and Vicente Mas
complied.
Present: Commissioner Lena Cole-Dennis
Commissioner ponald Dove
Commissioner Lucille Kanka
Commissioner Roy Pryor
MOTION by Commissioner pove, SECONDED by Commissioner Pryor,
to grant excused absences for Commissioner Raymond and
Willis. MOTION carried unanimously.
Also present: Douglas Barnes, General Counsel
Vicente L. Mas, Director
�:.ommunity Development Department
Kenrick Karefa-Johnson
Senior Planner/Redevelopment
John Claxton, Clerk
Planning Division
James Devore, Associate Civil Engineer
Public Works/Engineering Division
Joy Valentine, Minutes Clerk
Approximately twenty people were in the audience.
D. A�proval of Minutes
Mr. Mas stated that, per the Brown Act, the Agenda had been
duly posted.
City Clerk Andrea Hooper administered the oath of office to
Mr. Alberto Montoya Penalber, then welcomed him to the
Commission. Chairperson Kanka welcomed him for the
Commission and Mr. Mas welcomed him on behalf of staff.
MOTION by Commissioner pove, SECONDED by Commissioner Cole-
Dennis, to approve and accept the minutes of December 8,
1987, as presented to the Commission.
DISK 24:MINUTES
1
,
' The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Kanka,
Penalber, Pryor
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Raymond, Willis
ABSTAIN: None
Continued Public Hearing
None
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Tentative Parcel MaA - Case No. 87055
10857-10859 Drury Lane (Lynn T. Stewart)
Mr. Mas presented a letter from the applicant to
Chairperson Kanka, requesting withdrawal of the application
for Tentative Parcel Map, Case No. 87055.
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner
Dove to accept withdrawal of application by applicant.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Kanka,
Penalber, Pryor
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Raymond, Willis
ABSTAIN: None
2. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87072
11251 Wright Road (Kirk Mulhearn)
Mr. Mas presented the staff report indicating as follows:
The applicant proposes to build a two-story, multiple-
family development. The development will consist of eight
(8) three-bedroom units, with eight (8) enclosed parking
spaces and eight (8) open parking spaces with an additional
open parkinq space for guest parking.
The subject property is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the proposed development relative to proposed
density, bulk of the structures, parking, wall fences,
driveways and other development features required by the
Zoning Ordinance.
Chairperson Kanka opened the Public Hearing and asked if
Kirk Mulhearn was present. Mr. Edward Bennett, 5212
Lorilei, Lakewood, rose to represent Mr. Mulhearn. He
stated Mr. Mulhearn's preference for redwood fencing
instead of the 6' block wall fence listed as one of the
requirements, because Mr. Mulhearn lost several block wall
fences to the last earthquake. Mr. Mas stated that block
wall fences, properly constructed, are less likely to fall
during earthquakes. Mr. Hennett brought blueprints and had
no further comments.
Chairperson Kanka asked if anyone wanted to speak for or
against the proposed Conditional Use Permit.
DISK 24: MINUTES
2
�
Robert Frye, 12501 Alpine, Lynwood, stated his opposition
to any more apartment construction because, in his opinion,
there are already too many apartment buildings in Lynwood.
He stated that no more schools have been built and this
will ultimately cause serious overcrowding, which could
result in more students dropping out of school.
- Mr. Mas stated that an item later on the agenda would deal •
' with the problem of over development. Also, staff is
presently conducting a City wide survey, dividing the City
into districts, with each district to be considered
separately for determinations of maximum fessible
development density. He stated that the citizens must
decide the maximum population they want in Lynwood. Also,
staff is updating the General Plan. He stated his
expectation of wholesale revisions, but this will take
time, probably fifteen to twenty-four months.
Ray Chavira, 11434 Plum Street, Lynwood, wanted to know if
the School Board had indicated their expectations of any
adverse effects. Mr. Mas replied that the School Board is
presently understaffed and no response had been received by
the City. Mr. Chavira also wanted to know why Mr. Bennett
' hadn't said what good his development would do for the
� City.
Mr. Bennett returned and stated that the building will be
attractively finished with woodsiding and blue stucco, Cape
Cod style. These will be low-income rentals with plenty of
parking and 25� landscaping, which includes trees, shrubs
and grass, as well as a playground in the back yard.
Commissioner Penalber asked the maximum numbe� of children
that will be permitted to live in the apartments and Mr.
Bennett replied, "Thirty-two."
Commissioner Pryor asked if the owner/realtor plans to keep
or sell the units. Mr. Bennett replied that he had
worked for Mr. Mulhearn for one year and Mr. Mulhearn has
kept all the units Mr. Bennett has built. Mr. Penalber
asked Mr. Bennett the exact title of his job and Mr.
Bennett replied, "General Foreman."
There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairperson Kanka
closed the Public Hearing. She commented that our City ,
staff is very efficient and she has always been able to
rely on their investigations, secure in the knowledge that
they will investigate thoroughly and require a11 necessary
improvements.
Commissioner Penalber stated the applicant should have
attended the meeting because he can now disclaim
responsibility for the listed requirements.
� Mr. Mas stated that it is City policy to permit the
, applicant to send a representative of his choice. The
Commission is expected to act on the merit of the
application, not on the presence of the applicant.
. Mr. Barnes stated the the politeness or presence of the
owner is not legally important, the case should be decided
on the merit of the application.
Chairperson Kanka commented that some applicants have had
• speech or language barriers; Therefore, requiring someone
to represent them.
DISK 24:MINUTES
3
U
Mr. Mas said the Commission could continue the hearing to
the next meeting if the applicant's representative, Mr.
� Bennett, had failed, in any Commissioner's opinion, to
answer their questions properly.
Commissioner pove stated that the application .met all
criteria, so he made the MOTION to approve, SECONDED by
Commissioner Penalber.
` The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Kanka, Pryor
NOES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Penalber
ASSENT: Commissioners Raymond, Willis
ABSTAIN: None
3. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87095
3156 Euclid Avenue (Robert Rogers)
The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to operate
a group residential facility, "Teen Challenge," in the R-3
• (Mutiple-Family Residential) zone.
The applicant called staff and requested that this matter
' be continued to the February 9, 1988, meeting of the
Planning Commission, because Teen Challenge has not
received certain documents from its architect.
Chairman Kanka called for a motion.
MOTION made by Commissioner Cole-Dennis, SECONDED by
. Commissioner Penalber, to continue to the February 9, 1988,
meeting of the Planning Commission.
The MOTION carried by the following vote:
; AYES: Commissioners Dennis-Cole, Dove, Kanka,
• Penalber, Pryor
;
� NOES: None
4
ABSENT: Commissioners Raymond, Willis
ABSTAIN: None
4. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87097
4271 Carlin Avenue - (Teresita Valdez)
. Applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to re-open a convalescent hospital, originally known
as Ailton Convalescent Home, to provide geriatric,
primarily non-ambulatory 24-hour care, to operate at 4271
Carlin Avenue. The site was the location of a similar
operation which has been closed for two years. The
, facility contains 105 beds ranging from single occupancy
rooms to three individuals in a room. The site is
surrounded by single family residential homes on two sides
and multi-family apartments on the west.
' A Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of the
convalescent hospital was issued in 1969 and another
Conditional Use Permit was issued in 1975 to allow the
hospital to become a commercial home for convalescents and
" state/county retirees. This Conditional use Permit was
revoked partly in 1978 and totally in 1979. .
DISK 24:MINUTES
4
Staff recommends that the total number of beds at the
+ facility be reduced to ninety because of a shortage of
parking spaces for staff.
, A statement of twelve pages covering the past history of
the hospital was given to the Commission by Reverend Paul
Hackett, who was seated in the audience.
Chairperson Kanka asked the name of the present owner and
, the applicant replied, "Sam Menlo." Chairperson Kanka then
opened the Public Hearing and the applicant, Teresita
Valdez, 3817 Atlantic Avenue, Long Beach, rose to speak.
Ms. Valdez stated she would like to delay the inspection by
the Fire Department because another inspection will be
required when she applies for a license from the State
Health Department to run the facility.
Mr. Mas stated he has no objection to delaying the
inspection by the Fire MarshalL
, Ms. Valdez accepted the reduction of patients from 105 to
90 as a temporary restriction, and stated she plans to
acquire the pzoperty directly south of 4271 Carlin in order
to increase the number of parking spaces.
� Mr. Mas stated that solution would be acceptable only if
e the property is adjacent to the subject property.
Mr. Valdez stated she will accept the 90-patient approval
available now, and will work with Mr. Mas later about the
increase to 105. She then discussed her plans to have a
convalescent nursing home under Title 22 for patients that
require 24-hour care. She plans to have the minimum
nursing personnel required. She will lease the property
from Sam Menlo, who will not be involved in the management,
she alone will manage the facility. No mental cases will
be accepted, only convalescent patients. 5he stated there
will be a medical director available 24 hours a day, not
necessarily there on the property eight hours every day.
� Commissioner Pryor asked if Sam Menlo could take over the
operation of the facility if Ms. Valdez decided to quit.
Ms. 'Valdez replied in the negative, the license to operate
the facility will be issued by the Department of Health in
- her name only. She stated she has a five-year nenewable
lease on the property and plans to stay. She stated she
has previous work experience both with the Lynwood Fire
Department and the State Health Department.
Commissioner pove asked if there would be periodic follow-
up inspections by the Fire Department, and Ms. Valdez
replied in the affirmative, periodic inspections are
required by the Conditional Use Permit.
At this point, Chairperson Kanka asked if anyone in the
audience wished to speak for the Conditional Use Permit and
received no replies. She then asked for speakers against.
Reverend Paul Hackett, 12209 Harris, Lynwood, the person
who distributed the 12-page letter, rose to speak against
_ the proposed facility, based on his many years of
- experience with the patients and Sam Menlo. He said the
patients had wandered around his church with no apparent
supervision and that one of the patients had spat in the
face of one of his parishioners. In his opinion, Sam Menlo
would be the real power. He further stated that on the
basis of past history, the entire financial arrangements
should be thoroughly investigated. He said Sam Menlo had
used three different names previously.
IIISK 24:MINUTES
5
Ms. Barbara Peppard, 4225 Alvada, Lynwood, who has lived in.
Lynwood for twentp-five years, rose to present a copy of a
petition she gave to the City Council in October 1986, with
; over 200 signatures. She stated that everything at the
facility gets worse every time a new manager goes in. She
has visited the hosFital many times, in a charitable
situatic;t, through her church. She wants the patients to
get good care and the hospital has been seriously
under-staffed in the past. She has witnessed patients in
line for various things, like medicine.
^obert Frye, 12501 Alpine, Lynwood, rose to say that the
facility has been closed three times in the past. He
personally almost hit a patient who ran in front of his car
begging for money. He wanted assurance that the license
will be in hear name only. Chairperson Kanka assured him
that it would.
Mr. Frye further stated that lots of money had been spent
on furniture and refurbishing the building. He is of the
opinion that there must be a silent partner and wants to
know. who. He wants a security officer on the premises 24
hours a day, seven days a week. He suggested that the �
Commission should deny, or at least postpone, the granting
of the_Conditional Use Permit until all questions have been
answered, such as exactly who will run the business and who
owns what. He stated that this is the only hospital in the
area; this property is totally surrounded by single family
and multi-family residences, plus one church.
Chairperson Kanka invited Ms. Valdez to respond. Ms.
Valdez suqgested that the Commissioners visit the Hillcrest
Convalescent Hospital, 154 beds, now under her supervision,
which is located in the middle of a residential area, at
3401 Cedar Avenue, right off the freeway. She went on to
give specific directions. She stated her pride in her
work, accomplishments and working history, which includes
three years as a nursing home administrator and experience
as a planner-consultant for the county. She plans to
provide a security guard, but stated that most people will
be bedridden, 65 and over. She will not admit drug-related
patients.
Commissioner Pryor asked if Sam Menlo has a financial
interest and Ms. Valdez replied in the negative, adding
that she has a five year lease on the facility and
furnishings. She will maintain the building, and pay the
utilities and taxes. She, alone, will be responsible for
the property, she insisted.
Reverend Hackett stated his acceptance of Ms. Valdez, but
asked the City Attorney if Sam Menlo can legally do this,
based on the court's previous order.
Mr. Barnes replied that he doesn't believe Sam Menlo will
�be operating the home and Mr. Menlo hasn't been prevented
from owning property.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairperson Kanka
closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Mas stated further investigation could disclose if
owner is involved in any way other than as stated by Ms.
Valdez. Also, character of Ms. Valdez is pertinent and
staff could ask that evidence as to her good character be
- submitted.
DISK 24:MINUTES:
. 6
' Ms. Valdez stated that staff could contact Richard Wolf, a
respresentative of the County Health Department, and gave
her license number (4470).
� Chairperson Kanka reiterated that the Public Hearing was
closed.
Commissioner Pryor stated that the Commission must be
positive that Sam Menlo is not involved, especially since
he operated illegally for a long time, in the past.
MOTION by Commissioner Penalber, SECONDED by Commissioner
Cole-Dennis, to continue the case and request that both
legal counsel and staff investigate further to make
absolutely sure that Sam Menlo is not involved in the
management of the hospital, and to ensure that any change
in ownership will require the consent of the Commission.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Kanka,
Penalber, Pryor
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Raymond, Willis
ABSTAIN: None
Chairperson Kanka stated her preference that the hospital
not be re-opened, based on Sam Menlo's past history with
the hospital. She asked that, at minimum, a report be
given to the Commission at its February 9, 1988, meeting.
5. Tentative Parcel Map - Case No. 87099
3174-78 E1 Segundo Avenue (Alex Galindo)
Applicant is requesting Tentative Parcel Map approval to
consolidate two and one-half parcels into one, in order to
build fifteen apartments.
Mr. Mas stated there are two units on the property now,
those will be demolished and replaced by fifteen units.
The site area is approximately 28,560 square feet and
surrounded, on all sides, by multi-family residential
areas. The map was reviewed by the Site Plan Review
Committee and recommended for approval by the Commission,
subject to stated conditions. The Community Development
Department has determined that the project would not have a
significant effect on the environment, and a Negative
Declaration has been prepared, in accordance with the State
CEQA Guidelines, as amended. Staff analysis shows the
consolidated lots to be in character with existing
residential developments in the area and consistent with
objectives, policies, and land use specified in the General
Plan.
Chairperson Kanka opened the Public Hearing and asked that
the applicant step forward.
Alex Galindo, 6812 Pacific, Huntington Park, California,
90255, rose and stated his acceptance of the thirteen
conditions.
Since he had nothing further to say, Chairperson Kanka
asked for audience response for approval. There being
none, she asked for comments against approval.
DISK 24:MINUTES
7
' Robert Frye, 12501 Alpine, Lynwood, rose to state his
distaste for any more apartments in Lynwood, which, in his
opinion, is already overbuilt with apartments. He stated
. he lives in that.particular area, which is a high-crime
area, particularly bad for any more apartments. He stated
the automobile drivers on El Segundo nev�r stop, traffic is
already terrible, and more apartment buildings will only
increase the problem. The street light near his home was
shot out Hew Year's Eve, and never repaired. At night, he
hears gun shots. He stated his approval of City staff.
Chairperson Kanka asked the applicant if he wished to
reply, and Mr. Galindo rose and stated he is a responsible
landowner who considers this a long-term investment. He
will not rent to persons he considers undesirable.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairperson Kanka
closed the Public.Hearing.
There was a short.discussion among the Commissioners as to
how many apartments could be built if the parcels were not
consolidated into one and the answer given by staff was
thirteen. Mr. Mas stated that density bonuses are now in
the City Code, which raises the number of apartments
permitted to fifteen if the lots are consolidated.
Commissioner Penalber asked how many calls the Sheriff's
Department receives in that area, and Mr. Mas replied that
information was.not pertinent. The inference cannot be
� made that rental units require more police protection than
owner-occupied. He further stated that approval of the
Tentative Parcel...Map only deals with the consolidation of
two lots.
MOTION made by Crnmnissioner pove, SECONDED by Commissioner
Pryor, to adopt Resolution No. 2163, A RESOLUTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING
TENTATTVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19367 TO COMBINE LOTS 19 & 21 IN
BLOCK 14 OF BELLE VERNON ACRES AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK
9, IN THE OFFICE OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER,
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 3174-3178 EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD, LYNWOOD,
CALIFORNIA, and .finding �that Tentative Parcel Map No.
19367, Case No. 87099, will not have a significant effect
on the environment and certify the Negative Declaration as
adequate.
Chairperson Kanka called for a roll call vote, and the
MOTION carried by.the following vote:
AYES: Crnmnissioners Dove, Kanka, Pryor
NOES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Penalber
" �,�c,ENT: Commissioners Raymond, Willis
ABSTAIN: None
Sa. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87099
3174-78 E1 Segundo: Alex Galindo -
Applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to build fifteen apartment units at 3174-78 E1
Segundo Boulevard, Lynwood, California.
Subject property is located on the north side of E1 Segundo
Boulevard between Santa Fe and Alpine Avenues, and consists
of two flag lots totaling approximately 28,560 square
feet.
DISK 24cMINUTES
8
Two older units are now on the property, but they will be
demolished and replaced by fifteen units, each with either
• two or three-bedrooms. The property is surrounded, on all
sides, by multi-family residential areas, and is consistent
with the General Plan. The height of the buildings shall
not exceed thirty-five feet, and a six-foot block wall
° fence will be built on the perimeter of the lot, except in
the front yard setback, where the wall will not exceed four
feet in height. The Site Plan Review Committee has
recommended approval by the Planning Commission, subject to
stated conditions. Staff has not found that any
substantial environmental impact will result, therefore, a
Negative Declaration has been prepared.
;, Staff has not received any public comments with respect to
this project.
Chairperson Kanka opened the Public Hearing and asked for
comments by the applicant.
Alex Galindo, 6812 Pacific, Huntington Park, stated his
plans to build fifteen units, three 3-bedroom and twelve 2-
bedroom units. He discussed the playground and central air
conditioning, and stated that his apartments will provide
better fire protection because of the larger lot and
apartments. The school board will receive $25,000.00 plus
if the apartments are built, he stated. He stated the
planned apartments will be located across from a park,
rehabilitated apartment houses and a vacant lot presently
owned by the City.
At this point, there was a short discussion culminating in
the decision that the reference to "studio apartments" in
the agenda should be deleted. Then another discussion of
the ten 2-bedroom split level apartments and three 2-
bedroom apartments over carports, which did not correspond
with the above-mentioned twelve 2-bedroom and three 3-
bedroom apartments. Also, Mr. • Galindo wanted the
modification of Requirement No. 38 written in, and the
deletion of No. 38 as presently written, per his meeting
with Jim Devore.
Commissioner pove asked about landscaping and Mr. Galindo
responded that 24" box trees would be in the parkway, there
will be an automatic sprinkler system, grass, the
aforementioned playground in the back yard, groundcover in
walkway areas, wrought iron gates and a brick facade in the
planter area in front of the apartments.
Commissioner Penalber asked about the lighting system and
Mr. Galindo showed it to him, using �he map.
Mr. Mas stated the lighting plans will be taken care of at
the time of the plan check and further that the lighting
will be required to conform to the City Code.
Chairperson Kanka asked the audience for comments for the
proposed apartments, and receiving none, asked for comments
against.
Robert Frye, 12501 Alpine, Lynwood, stated he has attended
the Community Advisory Committee and also that he doesn't
like all these apartments. He stated the park opposite the
proposed apartments is in deplorable condition, and that
the children run across the street without looking. He
stated .his opinion that as many as sixteen people may live
in one unit, and, again, that he doesn't want any more
apartments built. Crime is rampant in the area, he stated.
DISK 24:MINUTES
. 9
Ray Chavira, 11434 Plum Street, Lynwood, stated that City
staff should communicate with the Sheriff's Department, and
, schools, to make sure no problems will be caused by the
presence of more apartment buildings. He further stated
that he lives in that area and they are being packed in
like sardines, although he is not exactly for or against
the proposed apartments. He wanted to be assured that Mr.
Galindo will continue to own the property.
Mr. Galindo returned and stated he is not planning to sell
the property and that he doesn't rent to people carrying
guns.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Chairperson Kanka
closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Pryor stated that it is possible that
apartments with good management can have as good, if not
better, upkeep that a owner-occupied home where the owner
does not maintain his property properly.
� Mr. Barnes said the Commissioners can reduce density, deny
bonus, or scale down the number of units, with the owner
and staff working together.
Commissioner Penalber stated he has done volunteer work
with the Sheriff's Department for five years, lived in
Lynwood for thirteen years and worked with the Crime
Commission. He stated his opinion that the environment of
Lynwood is not good, further, that there are no small homes
in the affected area, there is a liquor store right on the
corner, and lots of shooting and drug dealing, even murders
have been committed in that area. He was concerned about
the consequences of any more apartments in the area.
Chairperson Kanka stated that much bad behavior can be
controlled by owner-management involvement.
Commissioner pove wanted to be assured that occupancy
restrictions would be enforced. He was answered by Mr. Mas
who stated that occupancy levels are difficult, if not
impossible, to control.
Chairperson Kanka asked for a motion. MOTION was made by
Commissioner Pryor, and SECONDED by Commissioner pove, to
delete No. 38, find that the proposed development will not
have a substantial effect on the environment and certify
the Negative Declaration as adeguate, and pass A RESOLUTION
OF THE PLANNING CONIInISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87099 FOR TAE CONSTRUCTION OF
FIFTEEN (15) APARTMENT UNITS AT 3174-78 EL SEGUNDO AVENUE, ,
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, IN THE R-3 (MULTIPLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL). Chairperson Kanka asked for a roll call
vote, and the motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Kanka, Pryor
NOES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Penalber
ABSENT: Commissioners Raymond, Willis
ABSTAIN: None
DISK 24:MINUTES
10
6. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 87099
10730 Long Beach Boulevard (Laura Torres)
Applicant is requestinq Conditional Use Permit approval to
operate an automobile sales and minor automobile repair
business at 10730 Lonq Beach Boulevard in the C-2A zone.
- Mr. Mas statea the property consists of a single lot,
approximately 10,560 square feet, with an 800 square-foot '
building, to be used as an office and work area.
Surroundinq land uses are commercial on three sides, and
multi-family on one. Proposed land use is consistent with
the existing zoning classificatin, and is categorically
exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA, as amended
(Section 15303, Class 3).
Chairperson Kanka asked for the owner, and William Torres
rose to speak for Laura Torres, who was ill. He stated
his acceptance of all conditions.
' Mr. Mas reminded him that these conditions must all be met
within six months.
There being no one wishing to speak for or against the
proposed Conditional Use Permit approval, Chairperson Kanka
closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis asked for an explanation of the
map and wanted a clarification as to whether only sales of
cars would be permitted. when informed by Mr. Mas that
minor repairs would be allowed, she wanted assurance that
only cars to be sold would be repaired. Mr. Mas stated the
primary use of the land would be for sales of cars, but
minor repairing of all cars would be permitted.
Commissioner Penalber stated his objection to both sales of
cars and repairs of cars on the same lot.
Mr. Torres stated his intention to do only minor repairs on
cars, his primary interest is in the sales of cars.
Chairperson Kanka called for a motion. MOTION made by
Commissioner pove, SECONDED by Commissioner Pryor, to find
that the Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 87100, will not
have a significant effect on the environment and approve A
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYWOOD
APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE OPERATION OF AN
AUTOMOBILE SALES AND MONOR AUTOMOBILE REPAIR BUSINESS AT
10730 LONG BEACH BOULEVARD, LYNWOOD.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Kanka,
Penalber, Pryor
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Raymond, Willis
ABSTAIN: None •
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS
Mr. Mas explained to the Commission, for the information of the
new Commissinoer, that Regular Order of Business does require
deliberation and action from the Commission, however, it does
not require a public hearing.
DISK 24:MINUTES
11
1. Resolution approving an amendment to the text of the
Preliminary Plan for the proposed Amendment No. 3 to the
. Redevelopment Project Area "A".
Mr. Mas presented the staff report to the Commission.
On November 10, 1987 the Planning Commission considered the
proposed Amendment No. 3 to the Redevelopment Project Area
"A" and approved Resolution No. 2159.
" Upon review Legal Counsel advised adjustments referring to
section IV, VI and X of the Preliminary report.
The adjustment of Section IV consists of a specification of
street improvement projects namely: "Street projects are
currently planned for a number of streets including but not
limited to Long Beach Boulevard, Bullis Road, Imperial
, Highway and Atlantic Boulevard."
The adjustments of section VI and section X consist of
, specifications concerning building intensities and is
formulated as follows:
for Section VI
- "Building intensities are further controlled by
limitations on height of structures, setback and
parking requirements. It is anticipated
therefore that commercial intensities may
decrease while residential intensities may
; increase over time."
for Section X
"Because of the City's development standards, it
is anticipated that commercial intensities may
. decrease and residential intensities may
increase over time."
Staff recommended that the Planning Commission review and
approve adjustment to the text of the Preliminary Plan and
adopt the required resolution. It was further recommended
that the Planning Commission authorize that the revised
preliminary Plan be transmitted to the City's Redevelopment
Agency for their review.
After presentation by Mr. Mas, Commissioner pove made the
MOTION and SECONDED by Committioner Cole-Dennis, to adopt
Resolution No. 2159, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING THE ADJUSTMENT
TO THE TEXT OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA "A".
Chairperson Kanka asked for a roll call vote, and the
motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove, Kanka,
Penalber, Pryor
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Raymond, Willis
ABSTAIN: None
Mr. Mas stated that over 4,000 residents and business
owners have received a packet in regards to the expansion
of the proposed project area in Lynwood. At it's last
DISK 24:MINUTES
lz
meeting, the Lynwood City Council decided to elect members
to an advisory committee that would advise the City Council
• on the expansion of the project area. Mr. Mas further
stated that a meeting will be forthcoming to Bateman Hall.
2. Request for the Planning Commission to consider waiving the
one-year waiting period for Conditional Use Permit Case No.
87057.
Mr.° Mas presented the staff report.
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to
rebuild a mini-market which has off-sale alcoholic
beverages at 1201T At2antic Avenue, in the City of Lynwood.
At its regular meeting of July 30, 1987, the Site Plan
Review Committee requested that the applicant submit
another site plan, because the lot dimensions on the plan
were inaccurate. Also, the parking had to be redesigned so
that cars would noC exit by backing into the street.
On August 11, 1987, the Planning Commission continued this
matter to its regular meeting of September 8, 1987, since
the applicant had not submitted the revised site plan. On
August 26, 1987, the revised site plan was submitted to the
Planning Division.
The site plan was reviewed by the Site Plan Review
Committee on September 24, 1987. This site plan was
rejected because the ingress and egress to the site was not
correct. In addition, the applicant is now required to
file a Parcel Map.
This matter was continued to the November 10, 1987 meetinq
of the Planning Commission to qive the applicant sufficient
time to submit the necessary documents for the proposal;
however, the Planning Commission denied the application.
Mr. Mas further stated that Section 25-25.13 of the Lynwood
Zoning Ordinance established that following the denial of a
Conditional Use Permit application, no application for the
same or substantially the same use on the same site shall
be filed within one (1) year from the date of denial,
unless specifically permitted by the Planninq Commission.
In the subject case, since the Conditional Use Permit
, application was denied on November 10, 1987, the applicant
would not be able to apply for the same or similar use
until November 10, 1988.
However, since the denial of the application, the proponent
has submitted a revised site plan and the previous market
and non-conforming residential use has been removed. The
• revised site plan meets the requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance for the proposed use. Also, a Tentative Parcel
Map to merge the lots into one parcel has been prepared for
staff's review.
° Mr. Mas discussed the property use with the Commission
using the applicants site plans.
The site is located in an area which consists of commercial
uses, and the applicant is planning to construct a new
market with off-sale alcoholic beverages to replace the
older facility which will be removed along with the non-
conforming residential use.
DISK 24:MINUTES
. 13
Mr. Mas concluded that in view of the fact that a new
commercial building will be constructed and the zoning
ordinance standards can be imposed which may ensure that
the sale of alcoholic beverages will have a minimum effect
on adjacent properties, staff is requesting that the
Planning Commission consider waiving the one-year rule with
respect to this matter.
Commissioner pove asked what would happen if the Planning
Commission did not act on this matter.
Mr. Mas stated that if the Planning Commission denied the
waiver to reapply for a Conditional Use Permit, the City
would have no control over the current sale of alcoholic
beverages. If the Commission allowed the applicant to
reapply, this Conditional Use Per�it would fall under the
' new requirements, granting the City more control over the
sale of beer and wine. Mr. Mas also reminded the
Commission that this is just a waiving of the one-year
waiting period to reapply for the Conditional Use Permit. '
Once this waiving is granted, the applicant would still
have to go thru the public hearing process in order to
, obtain the required Conditional Use Permit.
After deliberation by the Commission, Chairperson Kanka
called for a motion.
, MOTION was made by Commissioner pove, and SECONDED by
. Commissioner Penalber that the Planning Commission grant a
, waiver of the one-year waiting period for applicant to re-
apply for a Conditional Use Permit at 12017 Atlantic Ave.
The motion carried unanimously.
. Chairperson Kanka asked if there was any time limit to
apply for the Conditional Use Permit now that the one-year
waiver has been granted.
Mr. Mas stated that the applicant has no time limit.
Chairperson Kanka stated that since the Planning
Commission waived the one-year waiting period, the
applicant should be limited to 90 days to reapply for the
Conditional IIse Permit.
MOTION was made by Committioner pove, SECONDED by
Commissioner Penalber to amend the previous motion to add a
90 day limit to the applicant to apply for the Conditional
Use Permit.
The motion carried unanimously.
3. Staff is requestinq guidance from the Planning Commission
in amending the Zoninq Ordinance in order to delete all
density bonuses except those required by State Law.
. Mr. Mas stated that staff is seeking, under the direction
of the Planning Commission, to be more aggressive in Site
Plan Review, more demanding in the quality of development
and more critical in the enforcing of the conditions set by
the Site Plan Review Committee.
After deliberation from the Committee, a motion was made
and unanimously approved to give staff directives in the
above stated matter.
DISK 24:MINUTES
14
STAFF COMMENTS
, Mr. Mas stated that the recruitment of Senior Planner has
failed and that the recruitment process must be started over.
We are currently operating at minimal staff level with
consultants operating at a high expense, This is causing some
problems but these should be eliminated within three months.
COMMISSION ORALS
Commissioner Pryor asked about �the status of the Code
Enforcement Division.
Mr. Mas stated that they are currently recruiting for two
positions in the Code Enforcement Division. Staff is studying
a possible change in the format .of the Code Enforcement
Division, but the City Council has taken no action as of this
date. Mr. Mas stated the process to bring forth these changes
could take from 18 to 24 months. „
Commissioner Penalber stressed the`.,importance of getting the
Code Enforcement Officers as soon as'possible.
, Commissioner Cole-Dennis asked about.the lights that were shot
out around San Luis and Abbot. She'stated it has been several
' months and there has been no response.
Mr. Devore stated that these lights are beinq shot out or
broken faster than Edison can repare them and that they will
get to them as soon as possible.
PUBLIC ORALS
Mr. Robert Frye, 12501 Alpine Avenue, Lynwood, also stated his
concern about the shot out lights that are on Alpine Avenue.
Mr. Frye also stated that in regards to apartment managers, he
feels there are very few. He also stated he concerns about the
traffic along E1 Segundo Blvd. and how the new Galindo
development will further effect this situation. He suggested
putting a traffic signal in the intersection of E1 Segundo and
Santa Fe Avenues.
Mr. Frye wanted to know the progress on the General Plan and
the Alcohol Ordinance.
Mr. Ray Chavira, 11439 Plum Street, Lynwood, also wanted to
know the status on the Alcohol Ordinance.
Mr. Barnes stated that the ordinance should be completed by the
end of next week.
Mr. Chavira also stressed the importance of the Code
Enforcement Officers. He suggested working them on weekends
and nights to get more control over the City.
Mr. Chavira also elaborated about an ordinance in the County
unincorporated areas concerning the sale of alcoholic
• beverages.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Planning
Commission, the MOTION was made by Commissioner Cole-Dennis and
SECONDED by Commissioner pove to adjourn to the next regularly
scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission on February 9, 1988,
at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of Lynwood City Hall.
DISK 24:MINUTES
15
_,. :., .
{
The motion carried and the meeting was adjourned at 11:46 p.m.
�
: APPROVED AS WRITTEN this 9th day of February, 1988.
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
ATTEST:
. Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Dept.
DISK 24:MINUTES
16
� i.r�.....A
� ��,n ��_�,i r` ��, I�T� h�� N0.
' � (�p ,r�. �1i; Q :
;� DATE: February 9, 1988 l.'hIJL ���.. V���� ���
T0: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 87097
Applicant: Teresita Valdez
i
Proposal
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit
to allow a convalescent hospital to provide geriatric,
primarily non-ambulatory 24-hour care to operate at 4271 Carlin
Avenue. The site was the location of a similar operation which
had been closed. The facility contains 105 beds ranging from
� single occupancy rooms to 3 individuals in a room.
This matter was continued from the January 12, 1988 meeting of
the Planning Commission, in order that the applicant could submit
certain documents with respect to the administration of the
facility and applicant's track record. Additionally, the
Planning Commission directed legal counsel to investigate and
report on the terms and conditions of probation imposed on the
property owner by the court.
1. Facts
Source of Authority:
Section 25-4.2a. of the Lynwood Municipal Code which
identifies the type of permit required for residential uses
within the R-3 zoning district. The heading of community
` care facility is a permitted use within the R-3 zoning
� district with a Conditional Use Permit.
2. Property Location:
The site is located on the north side of Carlin between
Castlegate and Stoneacre Avenues.
3. Propertv Size:
The site is rectangular in shape and is approximately 38,634
square feet in size, generally 94' X 411' (.09 acres).
4. Existin� Land Uses:
The site is currently occupied by a building which had been I
used as a convalescent hospital containing 105 beds, kitchen
facilities, as well as accessory uses generally found in
this type of facility. The site is surrounded by the
following land uses:
North: Residential
South: Residential
East: Residential
West: Residential
5. Land Use Descripti.ons:
North: Single family residential
South: Single family residential
East: Vacant
West: Multi-family apartments
DISK 22:87097CUP
6. Proiects Characteristics:
The applicant is proposing the re-opening of the former
convalescent hospital known as Hilton Convalescent home.
The facility has an occupancy of 105 beds for non-ambulatory
as well as ambulatory patients, and would provide 24-hour
skilled nursing care. According to the Los Angeles County
Community Health Facilities Regional Inspector, the
convalescent hospital would require certain basic care to be
provided, which is regulated by both Los Angeles County and
the State of California.
From a zoning standpoint, the site is consistent with the
permitted uses in ai� R-3 zoning district, as far as
building configuration. However, it does not meet the
minimum requirements £or landscaping and parking spaces
required�
It is estimated that 25 employees would be accessing the
site at the day shift, which is the 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
shift. The site is able to accommodate twenty (20) parking
spaces, which is not adequate parking for the employees.
The deficiency in the numbers of parking spaces available
and the number of parking spaces necessary indicates a large
number of employees would be required to park off-site,
thereby creating an impact to Carlin Avenue in terms of on-
street parking. Additionally, visitor parking must be
factored into the calculation for parking. The code
requirement for convalescent hospitals is one (1) space
per five (5) beds. Using that calculation, the site
requires 21 parking spaces to serve the 105 bed facility.
Consideration must be eiven to the appropriateness of
permitting the facility to re-open with an inadequate number
of employee parking spaces exacerbated by the number of
potential visitors on a daily basis.
7. Site Plan Review:
At its regUlar meeting on DecemUer 17, 1987, the Site Plan �
Review Committee approved the proposed project, subject to �
the findings stated in the attached Resolution.
;
8. Zoning Enforcement History:
1969 - A Conditional Use Permit to allow the cunstruction of
the convelescent hospital for a 100 bed facility. �
1975 - Conditional Use Permit issued to permit the
convalescent hospital to change uses to a commercial
home for convalescents and state/county retirees.
1978 - Revocation of the Conditional Use Permit to conduct
the facility as a commercial home for convalescents
and State/County retirees.
1979 - Revocation of the Conditional Use Permit for the
operation of the residential care facility for the
elderly. I
Note: As of the time of preparation of the Agenda, the
applicant had not submitted the information
. requested by staff, pursuant to Planning Commission
directions.
Y
DISK 22:87097CUP
. �
�
:.;
- I
f
Analvsis and Conclusion
1. Inconsistencv with the General Plan
The proposed land use is consistent with the zoning
designation of R-3, provided the Conditional Use Permit is
issued. However, the General Plan designates the site for
Townhouse and Cluster Housing which generally is more
consistent with the R-2 zoning district. T}ierefore,
consideration should be given for the potentiality of a
General Plan Amendment for the area between Cookacre and
Thorson Avenues.
2. Site Suitabilit.y
The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate a
facility of this type; however, its inability to provide an
adequate number of parking spaces for both employees and
visitors makes the size of the convalescent hospital in-
appropriate as to the number of beds provided. The
potential trips generated by both employees and visitors
at peak a.m. and p.m. hours would be approximately 35
trips generated by the facility which, by themselves, is not
anticipated to create an impact on the adjacent streets in
terms of traffic movements. It should be pointed out,
� however, that the combination of employees and visitors
woUld contribute to the off-street parking impacts caused by
insufficient parking on-site to accommodate the employees
and visitors.
3. Compatibilit.y
The compatibility of the land use to the surrounding area is
appropriate provided that the site accomodates the necessary
' parking spaces required to minimize the on-street parking
' impacts. In addition, the inconsistency between the General
Plan and zoning creates an incompatability of the
potential use and the city's General Plan for a less dense
land use.
4. Compliance with Development Standards
' Specific Findings
a. The proposed conditional use would adversely affect
the General Plan since the zoning and land use
designatiun are not consistent. To allow the
': convalescent facility to operate would necessitate
the initiation of a General Plan Amendment.
b. That the proposed location of the conditional use is
in accord with the objectives of this chapter and
the purpose of the zone in which the site is
located, since the operation of convalescent
� facilites are a permitted use within the R-3 zoning
district with a Conditional Use Permit.
DISK 22:87097CUP
c. That the proposed location of the conditional use
and the conditions under which it would be operated
or maintained would not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious
to properties or improvements in the vicinity, since
the site cannot adequately accommodate the required
number of parking spaces for the size of the
facility provided the number of beds does not exceed
90.
d. That the proposed conditional use would comply with
each of the applicable provisions of this chapter,
except for approved variances. (Ord. No. 1107.)
If the project is approved for a maximum of 90 beds,
it would then accommodate the existing number of
' parking spaces, thereby eliminatir�g the necessity of
on-street paricing for employees and visitors.
5. Conditions of Approval
Conditions of approval would be subject to the applicant
providing the following:
1. Reduce the number of beds at the facility to 90
beds.
2. Provide a landscaping plan for the entire site
including the parking lot.
3. The Planning Uommission initiate a General Plan
Amendment to redesignate the area between Thorson
and Coolcacre Avenues from TownhoUSe and Cluster �
Housing to Multi-Familv Residential, in order to
provide consistency with the current land use
patterns, zoning and the General Plan.
Environmental Assessment
. �
The development has received a Negative Declaration in accordance
' with the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended.
Recommendation
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration ,the �
Planning Commission continue this case to the meeting of March 8,
1988, in order to allow staff and lega'1 counsel an opportunity to
obtain the required information, or adopt the attached Resolution
No. 2158:
• a. Finding that re-opening the facility would not have a
significant effect on the environment, and certify the
Negative Declaration as adequate.
, b. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 87097, subject to
stated conditions and requirements.
Attachments: I
1. Location Map �
2. Plans
3. Resolution No. 2158 \
�
- Disk 22:87097cup
i
. �
; .
' LOCAT101U MAP
. � ,
: ; ' i i
.
, �
s � � _.___ __ __
. ' ' , , 7 y `I ? �� �
� ' �� S�.E �SHEET �3 '�� �' /'�� �
,
� � U ��____� � u U
, ,.
L/-1 AVENUE �
�. .,. .., .. �.. '
� • ' � � i n , - . :�° - k .�. � '< r�� ,. � t v 'S ��. r �s ri e p _ o�°.
� >, 71 (y�.15 5/53 57 1i50�Ne)� � �L15f�i)713lSOlf� V � N'Nll/f =
� Q �� .:.,. . � .. .�n� � a� z . _. a .. ,ri,..
.� ..�. ,_ , . ; t ' ' . . .s �. Q t y NV ,. ;, �. � H' ,. ♦ ,• xQ,•' W I
_ 'Fr. ; _,;Im'✓ 4±L313._' __S� __a . °-- 17; ° .7 : : - �� - 7e -- - , ^ Z ,
. .
? .
Si . ; :
- • e � ur '.•• �
.
.
:i � . yo�e p cevy. Z ,x... . .m..p L, �vo�� �__'__" °______ .:._ _. �-�-
"A!"' ";p- "'73_" ",GS"_' _'S7"' ; q � 37 y '_ I[" "I/_'" � ^ Q I -
�. � C �'_" �� ^ ..� t �,. � ��. .`� .:._ � : �n • I
� q :ns�t�� � y �� 7c ° ci� a O ,- -- � ao -- 15- - N ; - 1z -: . „
.t �oslr =__ � y . __ = : :o�r _ n ..o! ��ta_� u '�` � � � h � I
95"' 78 e � '� - 30 - ' � S9'__� ^%:'__ i dl' 14 �, IL 73-'
_�' S ' 9r .i: � � `d .ili i . C S .� i� i ,r i.ew �1 ��� .� f = rv � ,Y
� W �ir i.�. ' t � i.r. i ��h. .� c ' ��
AVENUE ;
vr � vu I l tei. �i• ur � ��. s� v ro se 99vo �'�` etu �.•�•� re i a� u.
I' I �^ �e .,I I B 4 1 = c.^� 77 � / ,� I. : I: � J
..i' I GI� I j 'i' : o / d0 29 76�. � � wl Fi °'I i � .
�� �I � I 1 � h a �6 0 7"'VF , i .�d_�_�� -1ie_—
;� i i � i � a i:•>i „� : zo e� � - � Z n i i1 �
::i � nn� l .li I � � I i � - 1S R O .'3`3 . a _ ini. _1�...' _ __'
n.r �� vr n.., Gi � i �. sn N .. ^� . nev - .7.7. r
., I i an t< ss � �.,,� � ., („) •
, �p... � ,... : i i°' � °: � ze � w.� . v „ ,•
% 4i 6 � `'� i � i /7 : /e /9:zoe1/;z1'^ , •o N.� � ` G J ; .
. r
.�� Q�' o•�} • � 1 � � ' ets ' so'i� ' 131� 4 ^N �� �` . `L'____tJ3__ __'J
7 �� at t ro .. . e
,.��,�,.: 501 ° ;� �'i�'�. '� � "`NILAND .,,5� . . °- ' ' F ' --- �� I
,,
� r-----"- � -�
:: ,, i . A :..
N in � '.� uu So So b So �nr x,n � •°: ^ __ � M
� � 8 N ��o n: j�2� �3 � w LsH „ � �6 . _—J w______
' � t � � � ' ° � � $: ' ' _ ' "� y C2 }'_`__- M .
�,c K �9 u, ` �/60/5"/6�/3 ;,l���l/' " "1
- �i , '� , s o ,,,. . �p �. ± R P � � '— r„'u------� I
so. so ..,, i
�ALVA .2 $T �� » sr ai �re ,, s;< s st 9r e,.�e za i � y i i
n ��� b � i v. �. ' � ° i i � �� I I
' e . 53 i3 nb ' ^ if'� � � i.�� I � �I� �i
g , „ I � I � i N �
.
, .
�f'^'.- : ,i � '
.:' �pJ 7! ZS 21v � u�� o a � , .M...:.:;�' � j� � ( �I �
�%- r �. i � �S v I .>.�;:)" � i � I�'. J �i
;: n � : >.x:I::),i::X ' ___ n � __ 2!t
IJ� �Gi;:iA:: ' J -- ^r
. � nu ,�>>• IIl I Q:]:. I r - I }_11L' � i
, �l � ° l6 �°. � .: ..::..;!,� i - �
� � 3� ,r--,...--- �
�. 1 B lc i I ,�I 'er:>;;':::'� � � a � ---- i � ,
� I . ,,,., . , ,� � � �;. : � 1 �: r -� :� � w
° �y �_-__ �
- � �i � O tl `I ` � so.rl I I ` `y .s�. ? �
^ E: St:: >::,: � i�-- ,,,.. �
� I � � �� a �: I I ueT �r T� I � I
'1e iv�� V � ' � �
g;�.>. >::<::.,,>
Iti� `, �`�20 ^ i� J ���i�� aS�, �9 � I � I I;, ;i i,' i; �-,..�,-
..TIJN LOif � 2 . � � � i8 I 1�.��0 �y ,� '�; I � �� � � � � i,^ W
: I � � Q� M < 1 � � I{ ��. i `` i` .,.
, ' � " 1 � � :': � � � � \'', I I � � ., y .
r a' D�I �\ '-� � I ;,',f�: � I ��., I` i
��, i�9 0 �. i�i �" a � ie � (' 15� 'e n•1 � �� v 6 ::� ; �'�!iR�;'. es fo.s u reirt '� � .
i� �C�t/I��,�i x Y -- -- AVENU �
`�✓ � n�t� cs.as ssrs uxd iee _ o _ n. r_ e�,� iu.0 .�e.n p �e
t .� 1: ♦ _ .f C
`�,.b 9 � � : ° 3 . i � �_'�a_'_ W / T . ,
�,�� ° 2 i , � � � 1 ° ) : s: 69 a� W . ' j �_i� �� i�.�, j G Z ' I
� � nr " W I
',..� ,r.,s re.se , Z . w `�� L� �l ` i^ii• i
�,u 9 s� a iu.r W �/Y`i��i ^i__��t" Q^ raa� �-I
�.. in Y 1 ai : ro e ;:< . �� L_�� Q . �'� __ i =-- � y--= a � '��'a..e '
Jp ie i IR � � /It .1�.�� �' ?o A^ �\_ __ S li \ ♦ �— u.
' T � aL . ...�r� . ...... ........ .
iJ
e � 66 ' � '
::, S ,:.,,. R' i ...« .. '
S p . • �i�a \\ °yY-t+ _ I /8 u� ui _
� q ' 6 uu > 6 � �. f 1
1, �. ' a � iuf� � a I
-` � �, 6 � 6Q ,� , ,�.. ,n
. \ ' .�.a� ' �.,..i � ��, W �-___--'` i .
,,. � �------'- C� I
����'e 7 � 8 ���v' '..se 6 � U -_-- 7 i .
. '•`• .�soe �
g 9 s,a 62 -. W. � t 9 i � V .
. I' :<� .� � Z ' w.. � ^ ;n:.� I •' Z I
ry��.vs� {p �mi� ' . , 6, V . {-' ; - � b1 � /0 � � . Q
�:ao� � � // �fl. � .. . � , N � B �� � i ... �
is�n 9 �
i� � , � • � '� �' j�� i . ;
:,�-b '� �? J , , 59 . W P : „I
.,.. �
/�. � � �y> � Q r ,�P /3 w � „ ,... � ; ..
,,. � .,u c� . p ' �
iz , P� u,,., � s� w Q , ^ I
....:a. n,. J . .v.i Y �--- ' f ' I---- :
�. /S.,su . � 56 1- i p � �
� �� � �r.r iwai � ..,� Q � : � t O = � � �
`,. nb �,� � ! ,�.r 3 �`.5 � c� � r ..� N� V r� •� ... ,,.» I .
87097
RESOLUTION NO. 2158
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR TO OPERATE A CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL
FACILITY FOR THE ELDERLY AT 4271 CARLIN AVENUE
IN AN R-3 ZONE.
WHEREAS, the City of Lynwood has received an application
for a Conditional Use Permit from Teresita Valdez to operate a
convalescent hospital facili.ty for the elderly at 4271 Carlin
Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
after giving notice thereof as required by law, has held and
conducted a public hearing concerning said application and,
WHEREAS, the applicant has right of automatic appeal '
before the City Council of the City of Lynwood; and �
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines as follows:
A. The proposed location of the Conditional
Use is in accord with the objectives �
° of Lynwood Zoning Ordinance and the
purpose of the zone in which the site is
located, in that the proposed use has not
been determined to be an impact to the•City
of Lynwood.
B. The facility will not adversely impact the
residential character of the neighborhood.
C. The use as proposed by the applicant is
consistent with surrounding land uses.
D. The proposed location of the Conditional
Use and the condition under which it would
be operated or maintained will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety,
' or welfare, or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity.
E. The zoning is not consistent with the
General Plan land use designation, thereby
necessitating the initiation of a General
Plan Amendment to permit the use of a
Convalescent hospital.
F. On the basis of the evidence presented to it,
the Planning Commission makes the
affirmative findings required by the
' Lynwood Zoning Ordinance in order to grant
the subject Conditional Use Permit pursuant
to th'e initiation of a General Plan
' Amendment.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of
the City of Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and
determinations hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 87097
provided the following conditions are observed and complied with
at all times:
DISK D-11:RES02158
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1. The requirements of all other City Departments shall be met.
2. The applicant, or his/her representative, shall sign a
Statement of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, under-
� stands and a$rees to the conditions within fifteen (15) days
from the date of approva� by the Site Plan Review Committee.
PLANNING DZVISION
3. Provide four (4) additional parking spaces off-street method
of a covenant or;
4. Reduce the total number of beds to 90.
5. Provide a trash enclosure to City standards.
6. An inspection by the State Fire Marshall will be necessary
prior to issuance of a Conditional Use Permit.
7. Expert technical assistance is necessary to determine a
solution to building and fire code deficiencies.
" PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
8. Reconstruct easterly wing of the westerly driveway to
include sidewalk section.
x 9. Clear out basins and curb drain pipes.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
10. Obtain Fire Safety Inspection Request from the Department of
Social Services.
11. Other requirements from this department shall be determined
by field inspections.
DISK D-11:RES02158
Section 3. The Community Development Department has
determined that the project as proposed could not significantly
impact the environment; a Negative Declaration has been
prepared.
Section 4. A copy of this resolution shall be
delivered to the applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of January, 1988, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
Community Development Dept. General Counsel
: DISK D-11:RES02158
fr �+�' •
� � AGENDA fTEM N0. �-
cnse �o. , �..�.��.�
DATE: February 9, 1988
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: V�cente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
Subject: C�NDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87095
Applicant: TEEN CHALLENGE/ROBERT ROGERS
Proposal•
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to operate a
group residential facility located at 3156 Euclid Avenue in the
R-3 (Multiple Family Residential) zone.
This matter was continued from the January 12, 1988 meeting of
the Planning Commission, at the request of the applicant. The
applicant wanted to revise the site plan. .
Facts
1. Source of AuthoritY:
5ection 25-4.2 of the Lynwood Municipal Code which
regulates the uses permitted within the R-3 zoning district.
The above referenced section requires a Conditional Use
Permit for the establishment of a residential facility, other
than the typical sinqle-family dwelling on the typical multi-
family apartment/condominium development.
2. Propertv Location:
The site is located at 3156 Euclid Avenue between Oak Street
and Peach Street. The Site occupies one lot.
3. Pro
ert
Size:
U V
The site is rectangular in shape and is approximately 21,000
square feet (.48 acres). The dimensions of the lot are 79.6
X 298.
4. Existina Land Use:
The site is currently occupied by a single-family residence
� that has had two additions to the rear constructed in 1957
� . and 1981. The additional square footage in 1981 was to
F accomodate a day-care facility.
;
i The surrounding land uses are as follows:
° North: Residential/Single
! South: Residential/(Compton) Multi-Family
East: Residential/Single
� West: Residential/Multi
5. Land Use Description:
General Plan Zonin
North: Multi-Family R-3 �
South: Compton R-3 '
East: Multi-Family
West: Multi-Family R-3
DISK 23:87095CUP
6. Proiect Characteristiccs:
The site occupies nearly one-half acre and would be operated
by tYae Teen Challengb Organization. The organization
providE:s social rehabilitation to men between the ages of 18
and 26:
The rehabilitation could include a number of separate issues
including drug and alcohol abuse; severinq gang membership
and/or previous involvement with law enforcement. The aqe
limit is open; individualse who are older than 26 years of
age may be allowed at the facility.
The facility is scheduled to house 10 to 15 men on a
short rehabilitation schedule of approximately 60 days.
After the 60-day perlod, the individual is either transferred
to a long-term facility elsewhere in the State under the
auspices of Teen Challenge or, he leaves the facility to
continue rehabilitation in another direction.
The facility would provide the day-to-day care of the
occupants, e.q., 24-hour housinq, including meal
preparations and sleeping accomodations. The site W Three a (3)
provide space for recreational activity.
professional staff inembers will be on site to provide
counseling services.
7. Site Plan Review:
At its regular'meeting on December 17, 1987, the Site Plan
Review Committee approved the proposed project, subject to
the conditions and requirements stated in the attached
Resolution.
8. Zoninq Enforcement History:
Code Enforcement activity took place in 1980 for fire hazard
conditions in the rear yard.
Note: As of the date of preparation of the agenda, applicant had
not submitted a revised site plan.
Analysis and Conclusion:
i
1. Consistencv with General Plan
� The proposed land u�e is consistent with the existing
zoning designation of R-3 and the General Plan designation
of Multiple-Family.
2. Site S�uitability
The property is adequate in size and shape to accomodate
the proposed use relative to physical structures, parking
walls, and landscaping. The anticipated increase in
traffic qenerated by the proposed use is not anticipated to
create impacts in the neighborhood, since a lot this size,
if constructed to the zoning density permitted in the R-3
zone, could be developed with 10 apartment units. This
would equate to approximately 33 people per building units
lesszintenseluse ofhtheelotChaslcomparedPtoaitsfdevelopable
potential.
Disk 23:87095cup
I
f i
I
3. Compatibility
The proposed use is compatable with the existing land use
patterns of the neighborhood.
4. Compliance with Development Standards
5peclfic Findings
�
1. �,The use as proposed is consistent with the Lynwood
`General Plan.
2. The use as proposed is consistent with the development
standards of the zoning district, provided that .there
is compliance with the conditions of approval.
3. The proposed location of the conditional use and the
conditions under which it would be operated or
maintained will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity, since the
proposed use is consistent with the development
patterns in the vicinity.
4. The proposed conditional use will comply with
each of the applicable provisions of this chapter, as
well as the conditions of approval attached to the
Resolution.
5. Conditions of Approval:
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have
a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties
or interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or
welfare.
6. Environmental Assessment:
This development is categorically exempt from the provisions
of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended, Section 15303.
I I RECOMMENDATION• �
�;
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the
Planning Commission, based on the site plan on file, adopt the
attached Resolution Number 2160:
1. Finding that the Conditional Use Permit No. 87095 will
not have a significant affect on the.environment and is
;exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
iGuidelines, as amended.
2. jApprovinq Conditional Use Permit Number 87095, subject
to the stated conditions and requirements.
` Attachments:
t:
1. Location Map
' 2. Plan
�!` 3. Resolution No. 2160
,�.
�` Disk 23:87095cup
�
� ..
I .
� LOCATION MAP
� I �� , , ,. .,
$ CARLIN AVE. � � CARLIN � b
•O..i 5.8L"1) n'.
. , isc e � st ' use -��„•�� 12.6 36.3�D63 726 36)M+3 l26 12.6 ''��"'; lS I :,,•�, � p C
ea M ie �X y I t 3 � � ni at � � ' :� �� b' r
, � � o o I � I i � � �
_L � � b
Q h _ ' _ _ _ '7 � � �° 9 _ _ I _ � M i r"` I ;. � � �
����� I ,. ry �
l lfiz .� 9 I Or` AJ o . 63 h � � O q
'�' �� I � �, �.:; ... ^' J :.:vn>'. v�u�� �� 1
/SI n i(i0 � ..
� . .vtu .vRar ,:. . �l� �/%� r� l0 /6 � � ��G n �� M� l� � � I
� � �:� �I; � J .Y.rs9• ;� �'��vn' � �
; z• ��.0 � �-�_�„--- Ir3 15 N 17 19 21 '' 23 zs I� `�
uiu i.wsr I � � � _ -
i i i.t �a4 2 L� — r.r ..� �.��.�:
. Q I O _'... _. � BLK. �;�� �
3
� � �.1D o � �� 2329'^� l (61C%'�q
,� gK � � � , u:: '" uo.m `� � 36j ee.� 'f2.6 �2. 12.6 12.6 �2.6 lS .l ^ (
6169 ' � 5�j " �, 62. �r.a �'t0.8s ''E�`
ii � TS � O � '�7rn•' io,ter•' Q2
m '
�a /JI N s s f �Oh /0 „..__ „ /5 � N �� �R �0
I,.'� 12 14 ' 16 ` l8 20 _ '—° 24 ��o `3
� ; � ; I 1 : �/ %* I O \ N �
OI Q C Nil'Jl'! i�se �: �srro ' —__ �o ___ Q__ O d
wc. r I a � � n � io � Os �PO � � . '� ."i �
35
� ,I � I ~1 �§ ° .w o0h o � o N �8 �n o ���s�� u
Z � h � � N �o�'
� I I I 8 1 I a '� ' N � 36 �
,o I I I „d I � '
js m�0 �
�.s I I I f � 1 � 62.1 12.6 'f2.6 12.6 12.G '12. 12.6 91.31 "�
� � ios , , � q � / 37 o�i .
� 3 EUCLID � A . $ � • � � �^ �
EUCLID iD � fU�L
�, �. ... , .
� iis ro fe �s.a.l ns i. n�` >t.b G/•S/J d��
Je � s.s�
4 � O h H.b Q
!e � iro FF �C � ' : � .
IJ � � � Vi ���,```., �,�`'... ?�i i' �
Q � 2 �• • zo � ♦ � � .' � a � , �. 6' L . � )� d' • i
zr� v �Q ..s , : �� �� i� 1
3 ie � _ =i . . � ` , g � ' r.l �/y .i ��� ��
sae = � 4 .` ,c� . � � lJ // �+�
4 � , y I! � � �i ,. 3� % • + O 4 4
4 � ' . e. ri O //.
' .iY g ' yT. `. �..
Y
v � 5 n��� 8 9� 9 II 13 �.;r'�a` 17 19 21 '��^, rl ��-�
m _ _ _ . :. ,� � � �' � /
� x 6 /3 �V �� / � 30 3I �:5;� : i1 Q6 3E j � 1 4 l
! a Y� [
� �� � ro i f lRfJ �� .�'.`�'�' lf.G lls stH \ ��d , (
T . rso sw/o ifioi �'°�i 5� /� Y.
�. D H �
� M � ' k 29 7/ O �� !7 �, O � �' �.4 /
N ^ ; I y
i 10 12 la 16 IB � 20 , j °° '•:��
•� C
F ' 6 ae I2 >I ��a ,... :.. f hr �
W ` ' lfn w p � 4 � 1 � � `' ✓� ��
� � .. �e _."' si IC i � I � ) , � ..
I � O , j . � /� ..
� � ° � �
F " � w zg'3C <i . I � (J� � �
r w '' � sa J L/ � r�
N e Y Z � �= r� � �O ` �rr i O � O y i
�o $ ,
� lYd s•.. i�O /
�. ti�� s s s• s I�v> w �zs �is swe ua/ 1: � /? Q� O �/�
/ �/ s L.
$ PINE ST. $ . s �� / /� . `O / .,
° / //4 J
—� op / �
�
� 315� c-:u�lr�, !I�\� '� � ,
�
�
�' �
i>
;.
I �
� �
, 8�oq
�' _
I _ . ..... � —
RESOLUTION NO. 2160
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE
OPERATION OF A"TEEN CHALLENGE" RESIDENTIAL FACILITY ON
LOT 15, TRACT NO. 14551, 3156 EUCLID AVENUE, LYNWOOD,
CALIFORNIA IN THE R-3 (MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
pursuant to law, held a public hearing on the application for a
"Teen Challenge" program at the subject address in the R-3 (Multiple
Family Residential) zone; and
i
W�EREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered
all pertinent testimony offered in the case at the public hearing;
and '
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined
that no substantial adverse environmental impacts W exempt eS from f the
this proposal; the prooject is categorically
provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended; and
� WHEREAS, residential facilities are conditionally
permitted in the R-3 (Multiple Family Residential) zone.
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines as follows:
A. Granting the proposed Conditional Use Permit will not
adversely affect the General Plan, as the subject area
is designated "Multi-Family Residential."
B. The proposed location of the conditional use is in
accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and
the purpose of the zone in which the site is located;
the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding
land uses.
C. The proposed location of the conditional use and the
conditions under which it Aould be operated or
maintained will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby
approves the Conditional Use Permit No. 87095, provided the
following conditions are observed and complied with at all times:
Community Development Department
1. The requirements of all other City Departments shall be
2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement
of Acceptance statinq that he/she has read, understands and
agre�s to the conditions of this resolution within fifteen
(15); days from the date of adoption of said resolution by
the P�lanning Commission.
�
Disk 23:87095
Planning Division
3., The twenty (20') foot set-back shall be fully landscaped.
4. The parking spaces located in the front set-back shall be
removecl .
5. A plan shall be submitted for the recreation area at the
rear.
6. A floor plan shall be submitted for the interior of building
showinq the location of areas used for administration and
residential and living areas.
7. A landscaped plan shall be submitted.
8. There shall be no cars permitted at the site other than
those belonging to Teen Challenge and/or its employees.
9. The number of students occupying the site at any one time
shall not exceed twelve (12) men.
10. Provide one carport for a parking space.
11. Provide a trash enclosure to City standards.
Buildina & Safetv Division
12. Submit plans from owners structural engineer on how to
convert these structures to meet minimum building code
requirements, include on plans for trash enclosure, and
required covered parking space.
Public Works & Enaineerina Division
13. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk along Euclid Avenue.
14. Reconstruct damaged and substandard drive approach(es), per
City standards.
15. Construct a five (5') foot wide planter to separate the
sidewalk from the parking lot.
16. Install one 24" box street tree per City standards along
Euclid Avenue; species to be Crepe Myrtle.
17. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass.
18. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all
j:
off-site improvements.
19. Install basin at back of walk to eliminate run-off from
"�� parking area from draining over sidewalk.
�
' 20. No parkinq from facility will be allowed to park in the
4 street.
�;
�:
�:
r.
F
�.
� Disk 23:87095
I
I
I -
I
I
� _
Fire Department
21. Apply for approval from the Department of Social Services.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of February, 1988, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT: �
ABSTAIN: �
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
Community Development Dept. General Counsel
Disk 23:87095
,; � : ,:...
- ' :.... ........._..;
i : �: , ,. �..,�:.,
� ..! v i:,l:v
' Z },
.,�4 : . ..: . ... . . . . . . .
y ..�., . „ .
4. �.::..:.; �.;:`,� ..;. _
February 1, 1988 �
Vicente L. Mae, Director
Community Development Dept.
City of Lynwood
11330 Bu11is Road
Lynwood, CA 90262 ..'
'. RE: Case �/87095
Conditional Use Permit
Robert Rogera
Teen Challenge Facility
- � 3156 Euclid Ave.,Lynwood
Dear Mr. Mas:
4Te, own.the property next door to the above noted addrese and have
been concerned for some time regarding the deterioratioa of this
property and the neighborhood. We feel that the eatab-
lishment of a Teen Challenge Facility would.greatly enhance the nelghbor-
hood. In particular, their influence would help protect our properties
from the undeaireable gaTg element in Lynwood... .'_ '
While this property wae vacant it was a center fbr aelling druga and a
gathering place for undersireablea. This wae of great concern to us
for the safety and protection of our tenants.
We are familiar with the background of'Teen Challenge and are in complete
support of the establishment of thia facility at 3156 Euc11d Avenue,
ood �Our p perty is at 3150 Euclid Ave., Lynwood.
....0 ����J
C'.
/ � ,, �/ ��
Richard anH'Bevezly Foster
P.O. Box 10471•
Torrance, CA 90505
�'
i
�
�
I
.,•-,.
��GCi���'1 I�'EM N0. 3
DATE: February 9, 1988 v��� ���• '�'�`� ���
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
, Community Development Department
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19054
�pplicant: Davis Development Company
1400 Bristol Street North
Suite ?45
Newpor�_ Beach, CA. 92660
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting a Tentative Parcel Map approval in
order to subdivide a 17-acre parcel for the proposed development
into three (3) parcels.
FACTS
1. Source of Authority
Section 25.18, et seq., Lynwood Municipal Code
Section 66410 et seq., Subdivision Map Act
2. Property Location
The site is located on the northeast corner of Alameda and Butler
shown as parcel 3 on Tentative Parcel Map 19054.
3. Property Size
The site is rectangular in shape and is approximately 11.45 acres
in size. Parcels 1 and 2(not a part of this proposal) consist
of an additional 6.6+ acres.
4. Existinq Land Use
The site is currently vacant with stockpiles of used tires placed
in various locations of the parcel. The site is surrounded by
the following land uses:
North: Manufacturing East: Residential
South: Manufacturing West: Manufacturing
5. Land Use Designation
General Plan Zoning
North: Industrial M
South: Industrial M
East: Town House & Cluster Housing R-3
West: Industrial ` M
DISK 10-1:87103pm
6. Project Characteristics
The Tentative Parcel Map submitted alonq with the proposed
development would subdivide a seventeen (17+) plus acre parcel
into three (3) lots.
Lot # Acreage
1 3.30 Acres
2 3.36 Acres
3 11.45 Acres
Parcels 1 and 2 are not part of the this proposal.
The tentative map is consistent with the General Plan and the
development standards in the Zoning Code. All lots would be
compatible with the development of manufacturing facilities.
The site of 11.45 acres would adequately accomodate the proposed
development of a 304,200 square foot building.
7. Site Plan Review
At its regular meeting of January 19, 1988, the Site Plan Review
Committee approved the proposed project, subject to the
conditions and requirements stated in the attached resolu�ion.
i
8. Zoning Enforcement History
None of record ,
Analysis and Conclusion
1. Consister.cy with the General Plan
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning
designation of Manufacturing and with the General Plan
designation of Industrial.
2. Site SuitabilitY
The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
proposed development.
3. Compatibility
The proposed development is compatible with the industrial nature
of the area.
4. Compliance with Development Standards
In order to comply with certain fire code requirements, the
developer has had to increase the rear setback of the building.
Disk 10-1:87103pm
,
The following are specific findings necessary to approve the
Tentative Parcel Map:
a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the
objectives, policies, general land use and programs
specified in the General Plan, in that the General
Plan designates this area as industrial and this
proposed lot merger is consistent with this
designation.
b. The site is physically suitable for the type of
development, in that the parcels are substantially
flat and able to support this type of development.
c. The development will be in character with the existing
developments in the area, in that there are other
large industrial uses in the surroundiag area.
d. The design of the subdivislon or type of imgronements
will not adversely affect public health, safety,
welfare or convenience.
,
5. Conditions of Approval ��
The improvements as praposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site Plan Review Cmmnittee, will not�have a
negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties or
interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare.
6. Environmen:al Assessment
An environmental evaluation of the proposed developmertt has been
completed. A Negative Declaration will be prepared for the
develapment.
Recommendation(s): •
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2166:
1. Finding that Tentative Parcel Map No. 19054, Case Na.
87103, will not have a significant effect on the
environment.
2. Approvinq Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 87103, subject
to the stated conditions and requirements.
Attachments:
1. Location Map
3. Resolution No. 2166
4. Site Plan
DISK 10-1:87103pm
87103TPM
RESOLUTION NO. 2166
A RESOLUTIO� OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CSTY OF
LYNWOOD APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 1`)054 TO
SUBDIVIDE A 17-ACRE PARCEL INTO 3 LOTS IN THE "M;' ZONING
DISTRICT, LOCATED AT ALAMEDA STREET AND BUTLER A�'/ENUE,
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA.
i
WHEREAS, the Planning Convnission of the City of Lynwood,
pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the �;subject
application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commissian has carefully considered
all pertinent testimony offered in the case as presented at the
public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the preparation, filing and recordation of a
Parcel Map is required for �he proposed industrial development;
and
Section 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that said Tentative Parcel Map No. 19054 should be
approved for the following reasons:
A. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the
objectives, policies, general land use and grograms
specified in the General Plan, in that the General
Plan designates this area as industrial and this
proposed lot merger is consistent with this
designation.
B. The site is physically suitable for the type of
development, in that the parcels are substantially
flat and able to support this type of development.
C. The development will be in character with the existing
developments in the area, in that there are other
large industrial uses in the surrounding area.
D. The design of the subdivislon or type of improvements
will not adversely affect public health, safety,
welfare or convenience.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 19054 in the M
(Manufacturing) zone, subject to the followinq conditions:
,
Communitv Development Department
1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all� other City
Departments.
2. The applicant, or his/her representative, shall sign'a Statement
of Acceptance statinq that he/she has read, understands, and
agrees to the conditions within fifteen (15) days from the date
of approval by the Planning Commission.
Planning Division
3. Within twenty-four (24) months after approval or conditional
approval of Tentative Parcel Map, the subdivider shall file with
the City of Lynwood, a Final Map in substantial conformance with
the Tentative Parcel Map as approved or conditionally approved,
and in conformance with the Subdivision Map Act and the
Subdivision Regulations of the City of Lynwood.
DISK 24:87103
4. No qrading permit or building permit shall be issued prior to
recordation of the final rnap with the office of the Los Angeles
County Recorder.
5. Extension of the Tentative Map approval shall only be considered
if the applicant or his/her representative, submits a written
request for extension to the Community Development Department
stating the reasons for the request, at least thirty (30) days
:�efore map approval is due to expire, pursuant to and in
compliance with Section 25-18, of the City Subdivision Ordinance.
6. The Final Parcel Map shall be filed with the City Engineer of the
�:: ty of Lynwood.
Public Works/EnQineerina Division
The approval of the Tentative Parcel Map shall be subject to all
the conditions established by the Director of Public Works/City
:ngineer (Exhibit A attached).
Section 3. A copy of this Resolution shall be delivered to
the applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of January, 1988, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES: ;
NOES: �
ABSENT: i
ABSTAIN:
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
Community Development Dept. General Counsel
Disk 24:87103
�
:
F
5� �I'
. � °� 1 � � � Z LOT p � �z� --� _ o"�, ea C ' ;,i i " iii 'o`
� ' , \ I I J W � 25:� �O P �1 �.� ,. ./ a �� ' r° .
. u � �� � � ? m .Mb'� j � l i � i � ��� / �i.
u' z� �DS
, � Z � a� 60 ♦ ' l.. �. �w ?I;u� k ^ � .
�- �� o� 5 ` v� s f . ro� c�fi .a +' � ; j i
u N _ O � �� I �. . . h, o: ^i w ti' �. �L �u
, I F "� ���� i' � —� I� 5 � � 4 51.f3 � p- ^��'• ;i,'S� � W s - T na e
� '� m � � r — \ �q � loa p0A0 nJi ° CY NWOOD ^' . ^xr f oti N .
� � .�
i \ 3 � �rozat3�� Po
> 3 n �` \ W v�y � � c�•ss
C � 7 .. N JYW' > � l� .^, o � �J l i
p p \ry h 7�9 l L0 ����i .
1 �� �u.» Y s
� i 1 x'r „� 1 ���yul �1tsa
o I'IS'� w 1, ',��1 `�
c �I �o
.� �o NY10D np.fT e \ �o �o� W �I ov .�le., �
. ; . . . _.... • �YN
�o '
, -...'__'__ . � � 13095 j _ � .� ' '_ . - o I_�l_-_ � yi I� �N` �� �`'1 0
� F .�.. i3o9? .� R <- S Q w \ � � �DS_ N � i�1
i - ; �pi � � a �� v . h ry 1- llb : 3 �. ��� � .
" ,e tl �, M �pb « � _ o ti , ��J! a �' /_/6l3 �
� o ,- - I6 � 01 '� 9 \ r, �' (L° � � �a -' _ o
.� i i ` o��a ' � ^` ;,i.:-. ` 0 o " ..,um � �� \ \\ 1' �_ +�/{J?� , ;1[�a`- � 1
_ � ��: al
� - i3oia � � \ � o �1: ��b37 � b3° `� n634
_ 2i \ � I� 30$ �� _ __ '
� � _ . -�11 � _�`� � //L3�- -
z� � � �6�p ELT � � 1���� rz + .p�xrv_l•
. � Lpr 6 � 9 �.�]-��� S' N SfR � a _�� � . ��4� - _
.7
� //
1
....::.;s»
- ..::..�:.�>:r:::a:::�:.;
.....:::;����: \
� t " >:':z>%:::':;:�>:.:.<:��:.';;:�€���i>::: v a U63
Q � .........;:
� . � .. :.:.....:..,:.::..::
� ot _ ...�._:`:�ss::::;i'':�:$;?:�:s�i:>;9a��.>s::::::;::>rs.;. l/lo
72 � < <v ':::>�:ti�:>;:><>..: �::
: " � ._.:. . _......_:..i:iii':'.:::;`.i;�:'s:
. � ,::. �:.�::::� � � . .. .. /
...:... . , .:...3>;:,; ..;::: � ::. .:..::.;:.:
.:.>::.::.. :�.Afi� .:.�:.�.�... ....:. ......:,.:;:_ � �:��:'si:i:::�.Y�.a.`� _��Si:s': �::r::; �'�:x.;.;::::� <..:s.:.. C / T ✓ ' ♦ fJ�
.....:::::." � x,...:.:.::. �{„
n ., .
�" �:;iiq�>.v.: �:.:::;:::.: �.�::::. :: _
/ .. O C ....:::.. �...'k .::: p _ _
......:.:...::i.s>:,>:� :. ..::.�>: .:.:::....:3�}F,. .. ....�::>.::: ' a 3 1 vS
...._.. +:...:.... ro:i: Y>:%'::s:.:.:i;'
,. .. ... . ......,.; : :::: �:�'.,r�..
� .........._... .... � >.�:::::.>:.:..:: ��..::n.n::4;.,::>.... . >:���:i:
b a .:. � � .... .,�::..:..'.,:::.;.:. . ..:..:..:..::..�.:.>:':::..:. ... O
in ..::....:�.:�...::...>� :::.......::.:.... �,Vf�,:.>�� 4�."����" �,..>:.,;:�:�;:.,�.:....,...
s :.:,>.:. . ....:.._ .. .....:.....
` ':::. -
. / 3 �.. ,: . .....:.. . . ....::..:,:. .._.. . . . .... .. ..... .... z�
.... . ..d.....:<::�: . K
.__...;..::.... .............::: . .. S ':..
� 1
, ;:.:... . ,:: .: < ............... �. :> . ;>.: . � DS
e ..rT.C...::. �� ..:.......:...:::........::..:....,. ............. .. ... 7
.. .::. ... ....:::.: ..�:.z:�'�<.5.';>r:¢.:>:s:..,:x..�:;•xy:.:�:.» ...::::.....:�...:..:::..:....... .:�:.....
�\ 5 . .... . .. . ...... .. . .:..
. . .. . ..:.......:. .>..:. . .x..,.::..:..::_. . ::.. ... :.....:::.�...::::�D:.:::r ::;,:::>n;a>:.�� �
. . .... ..r.,. .. ........ ................>....<.....:...._„��,:. .... :>..{.i..> :................ ...:...:..:r..9.':_sii:.::::�" � - _
y ..... ... .... .. ....: i._... .:. .: .....: ...c. <...,:......,..... : _,.>. ...: � ..:.:.. ...........,:..»::...< a. .
.. ..�.... . . . . ... .. . . . .y a .:.: �o<:>;>: �:...::�:.,
.eo �... r ::...... >..:... '{ ' ' -_
//
. .. .. � : ... n �. ......i�.�.:�.::�::.:::.:.:.:F ..:::.:..... ..�:.: . . �......�.. r.......i......ie Y..... I • �
1 . .... . .. .. .. .. .......�.. .... ..... ..... Y. .. ... .
\! i \ ; � .i:i �l`.$:" _
. .... . .. ._ �. ,. .. . . . ... .. .. .. .. .. . . ... .. .. . :... :.....:.. ...�:.2_. i..:.......: ..:::... ....'G
>:::... :::';:3::;�:`."::i.•�: `i /�b� u .� �
i ...:..........::..:n.::...:...p..:......p....� .: .i...:...w.n........::.'vn..:..:n..R.:....n....
..:. e:.... ..�:....:i ..:::..:..:. ::...:.......... ... ... ........ .�......._ ��
,. ... ..... ......:T. .: .. . ........ ..... :.>..:..:...,. ,....:.......:....... 1
Q' -- � ..... .. ..... . .:...�..::...:.. . .:..::...:....., . � �
� . . . . . . . . . ....::.:::. ::.:....:::.::.. .... ... .... ....... ... .,.......... .........�........... . ...,.
. . . .. . . . .. . . .. .. .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . .. <. . . .. . _ . . .. ....:...:: �.:::. :'....':, L
.. ....... ........... .... ......................�:
.. ... ... . ........., . ......._..............,.._. . . . ..
.:a::.::;:::::�.:
. .. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. .. .. . . . . . '�..... .. ....... ....,.... ......... —
� . . . . . . . . .. . . . . > ..:......:....:.. .... ::.y. D
.... ... . ........... . .. ............_.... ...............> . ......<.. ....<...... — .
. . . . .. . . . . _ . . . ..._.. . . . . .. _ .... . .......:..>...:... . ..........�..............::::.::..:.. T.d
.. ...... .. .......... ...... .. <........ ... ........_.. .. ._.... ..._. ....:. .....�.. ......
. .. . . . . . . .. . . . . i . . . . . . . .. .. .. . ..._:...:..:...:...._:...:...::...:....._::....... Y
� .. ._..............,.. ................,....�.........,........,......... ..:........... .......:..... I
\/ _ _ ... _ .. ... ....... ..... .. .. . . ......... .. . ... �.. .. . �
...:. .>...:...: .:.. ..:....:. .....:._.: ..: >.."�'oi:::�i
. . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . :. ... .......... ... . .. ......._..... . ......... . p �
� . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . v . . .. .. . . . . . . .. ..........
. . . i . . i .. . . �. . .. . . . . . . . . . y .. .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . ..�.. _ . . .
\ . n . . . . � � i . . .... .i . . � . .. . . i
.. . i ♦ . . .. i � . . .. . .. . i . . . . . . . . ... .. i.
. . . �. > . . ...n. ...�.. . ... . > . n ... .. .. .. .. .... . ....... .. .. n.....i..>�....:�.:.. .:...:... �y,�
::):����:,�
. . � � Y . . . . .. . . .. .. .. > > . . .. n .. ' . �. . . �....: .v.
:. ��.:i.. ..
. . ♦ n . .v n .. . . T . n i . . . .. . .. . � . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. ... . . . .. � _I � ] /
..n..�..........:............:.......n.... .:...J�...::...<.:..::.:..:...:.:......a ...:...:.:....::.. :..
F . . �. . . �. .. . < . n � . i .. � .. . . . .�v:.. � > '.:..::n.. .
. . v . � . . . . < ,. b .. . � . . . � . . . . ... . .. � . .�. . . ... . .. n... n. .. ...� . .. "'yy': p _
.....> ..... .....:... . <> .......... .. ......... .:...... .... �+........:,....:..... N 6
:.......... ... . .. ........ .. ..>. ..............�, v,. ,��y,�
.... .... , . . . .. . . . ,.... . ...n...........
. ......... . . . ... .............x...... .....> ... .. . ...........'r. .... .. >. ........ .. .. .. ......,. . ..... ... ... .... /!(o
.... . ....... . . ..... .. .. . . ........... . .. ........ .. .. . .. ... . ..... . . ..... . . .. . ..e.....�.::
\ . . ....... . . .. . ... ....... .. .. . . ......... .. . ... .... ,r...._ ......::...: ...... :..:..
.... . ...... . . . .. .. . .. ........... . .. .. ........ ... . .... .. ..,a...:..... .. ... ,... . ........:.,:. :..:.::� .:.......:...::...
.. . . ... ..... . . . . ....,. . . . .. .. . . . . . .. .
. n. . . . � . .'� . .. . . . .. .. . . . . .. n .. , i. . .. ..... .. �.......... i. ..i.n.... n. . T
• . .. . > . . , n . . .. �. .. . . .. . . . > . . . .. � . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . ..
.. . . . . . . � � . .. . . .. � . .. . . . . . .. . . . � .. . . .. . . i....::.:....:..n
. .. i . . . . ... . ... . . ..� .. . . . . . ..... . . . . . .... . . . .. . .... n .
. . �. . . . . .. .. � . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . � . .. . . . � . . . . .. > . . . .. .....
.. . n v . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. � . .. . �� .� . . > . �..
r
'.i:!)':��1'`�
� ..:....> .. .......... ... .......... ..........................>.................................,........ ..........o....,... . 6 /
... ..... .. ... .. . .. . .. ... . ..::::.: >..:::.:: ..�.
....... ....:. ...... ........................................ . . ...... ... .....
. ... .. . . .... .. . . . . .. .. .. . . . . ... .... ... ..,..... .. .:::.::.:...»::.;:;:c:.��:n:.:a:.�:»:�::�::;
..........., ..... ..... ... .. ..... . ............ . .....>.:...::.....:....:.:,...
...... . >. ..... :. . .. ..... .......... . . . . . ... . . .. .. .. . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . 7
. . . . . . .. . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . .. . .. . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . :.,....:.:......::..::.:.:.:..:...:.:. � -
..... . ....... . .. .. .. .. .. . ............ . .. ........ .. ..... . . ........ ..
. .. . ......... C � l I �
. . .. . . . . .. . .. .. . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . : , .:. ,.: ,.:...:. _.:..:::..::..,:.;::-•`'
� .... .......... . .........�........ .. .................. ................,..... . ................. c d//G
... . . ............................. .. ...............
\ . . .. . . . .. .. , . . ... .. . . . . ..... . ,.. ,. . . .. .. . ... ...,. .:...::.......:.......:....:....Y
. ... ... .... .. ..... .. .. .. . ........ .... .. .. ......... .. .. ... . .. .. .. .. .. ........ . -
. .. . . .. .. . . . ..:..... .. .......... .. ..... . . . .......................
........ .. . .. .... .. .. . . . . .... .. > . . . . . �. . . . .. .. .
....... ......... .. .......... .. .. . . . . .. .... . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. .. . .. -
.. .,� .. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . .. . .. .. .. . . . . . . . <. . . . .............:.:::......:::� D
. .. . ..... .... ........... ........ ....... ... ...�.. ..,
' `""` _
.... . `�^.... .... . . _ . .... . ... . . _ . ... ..... .. . .. . .... ... .. ..... ... ...... .. .. ... .. . J
. .. . . . ,. . . . . . .. . .. . . . . .. , . . . .. ,. .. . . .. . . . < ..... . ..... .....:. ....:...............:...:.'� w
... .. . .... ..... . .................. ...... .... . ... .. ......
.:... . .. ......... . , ..... ....... ... . ....... ..... . .�......... b
..... .. ... .......... ..... ................. . ...
.. . .. .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . � . > . . <. . . . ... ... ... ...:...,�:;i:$:i'� � _
.. .... . . .. .. . .,.. ......, .... . .. . .. ... ..... . ... .... .... .... . .... .......... .. . . .....,. .
\ < .. ...... . ..... ..... .. .. ... ........ .. .. ............... .. . ........... .. . .. ...., ..... _ <....:: .....:...< i:cfit<.:..::':.<: �`; ' i �- -
_ ...:._.n.:...:........ .. i.._ ..............:..J....n:�..:....:. .:.... . i.:...:.....�:_.i.v..:� .....:...v...:..:....:�.:....v..: ..:. w..:_ai......::n.`,::.�:.i N _
....... ....... . .... . .....:...... .............. ................. i....... .... ._..... .......n...._ ..
.. ..... . .. ............ .... ............... t... ....... ....n... . . .. ....:::..::..::..::.....i:::...n.::..::...i.:::..::.:.:..:::.� 1
` .... . .. ........ i . ..... . .. .. . .... .. _ . ... ..... ..... .. .. .....�...>. >. ............ .. 2
... . .. _ .. .. . .. ........�..�.. .. n :......... n .. .... .. ....:x..:...::i�.
.. . \ .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . ...............� ........ ......�....... ....... �:.:�._�:iii::;::>�>>:::7:.)95..., ..uY. _
.... . ....... .>. .... .. .........:.... ................. ... ... .. .::..::.. .. :.. ...i...
. • . .. .. . . . . . .. . . . ..::.....:...::.:.. .:...:...:...::..:...:....i.:. .: .....::...:..N...v.:::.:::..:: .._�:...:...:..p..:.:..:...:..p.�.:::.:::::p:.a. ..
�.
'.d .:..�..�.....N.:.. �. :. .:...:.. :.:..e .....:...:....i�.:......./...:...:.n:...::...rv..........:...:...:...:...::.../...:.i.: ..:....: ......:n.:...:....:. i...�....: ..:...:.n:...::.......:...:...::...:...:... �
... .:::::.�:):::�i:�"i���::..
i
'::.: .:._.i'ni....). `
/ . .. ......:...: .......:::...<:.::::...:.:..::.�:::.:::.::::•:.;:::.::::..:.,:::.:::.r. ... . ....:........:::.. � N Y , [L J
�:..�c . r....^<.:: :....:::..:.:..:::..:.:::.> ::::...:......:::.>::.�::: ... _
.......:..:... :........:.. _.:.:: ......::�.............::
... .. ... _. . ....
i
6�
� ..... . : .. . . ........:::.,...,::.:<..<..:...:: .<,..» ::.::..::..::::.:>.;»..::;::>.::>..:.....,:.>.»....::.::.:,:<.: ,,,,..:.;::,:..,,::.:.::::..:::,>:.::::.::..:::.::.,: :,.:. ... .::.;::,>::.:::.;. /
� ::. a ...::.........�..:.:..: ::..::..::..::..::..::..::..:n..::.:...::..::..:t :.:..:::.:::.:::.::..:..::...:..::..::.:::.::..:.. _.:..:::..::.:::.:....::_.:,.:...:::.....:::..:...::..:::.:::.:::.:.:.,::.,.:......:::. ..: .::..::_:::.::., Oi� __ 0 _ —_
.: �..:.::.>: �......:>:. ..:::.::.:.:.�:::.: �:.::.:.....:.::: :::.:.�::.:::..:...::.:: � .::.::::.:.:: �.�:::..::.:.:.: ^..::.:,.:.x�:::....:.::..:::..: :.::::..::...:.:.,:.:.:::.; -.�::..:::.:.::.:::::: �.:::.:.....::s.::: .
i .::.> ....::.......:.........:..:...:..:....::..::.::...::..::,.....:..::.....,:......:>.::,.::.:....::....:.:::..:>...:..:.....:::.:.:... -- e� ----
...... ........ . ..: . ..... :....... ,. ......., ,......................., .... .......... -
. . .. . .. . . ........:.. :..:: .:. ..........::: ..: ...._ .>..
.. . .. .... .. . .........._... .. ..... ...,.,... ... ....................,........ ..... .... . ..::::::o>.c. �:o>.; ...�.
_ . >.._ .. .... . .. .. .. .. e ._,..... ... . . ........ .. .. ...... ....,...... .. q•..>»;::::.::::,... )3
. .. .......:. . . .. . .:.. .:...�:..::.:....:.:... .G: �iR?::i:::� �:::�ii)%.�:
/ ....:..:. :_ : .:.. ...:.......:...:......_:......:..:........:......:..:....:...:..:....:,.:........... . -" .
.. .. . r .. . ........._ ..... .. ......... . _. _ . ......... ..... .. .. ....,...:::,::..:::.:::......::.:.......:.c...:.:::..::..::..:::;:. �^
..... . ...... ... .. . . .. ..... ...... .. _. ..,. ........ .. .. ..... ......... .. .. .. ......... .. .. ........ .....
.... .. .. .. .. ............... .. . ... ... ..... .. .. ......... ..... . .
. . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . .._ . ...........................:..:..........
�0 .. .. .. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. .. . . . ... . .. .. . . ,_.�:..:......:,.:.�:::.:.: .
. . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . < .. . .. . . .:.:, �:.:...
.. � . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . . . .. . �_ . ........._.
. .. . . . . . . . . _ . . .. . .. . .. . . . .. . .... . ..... ........::..:.... . _. �... ::.:::..:<b.:i:
/ . . Y .. .. . .... . ....:. ..:, �
) . ........ . . . .. _. .. .. ........ .. .. .. .. ....n ...._ .. .. . . ............ .. :.:.......... . . .:::..:...:::.::..::..::::....:: �.::..!�::v::.
1 ..: ......:...:... ...:: .�:..:._... .:...:..:� .:.. �:.......:. p...:.._...............:..::...:...:...:._:._:....:....._:...:...::...:...:_�n �:...:..:...:...::...:...:...:...::...:...:._v.......:_..:.. .. .
�.
Ii 90 ..SQ...:..:..::. .. ..:a..:: .:::.::.::: .::..•:..:::.�..::.•,...............::...:..: ..:...:...::._:..::...:..�::..::.::..::..::..:::..::..::..:::.:::.::..:.:..::..:....::..::..::..:::..:..:::.::......:::..:: :: -'7.a.�':. _
W ::...;> :....:..:.. ......::..:s.:.:...:..::...::..,..::..s ::.::::.::..::...:.....:..::.<.:::::..:..,.:,:: :.....:..:::.......::......,....:.:....::...:_....::.. 0 __
. ........:... ......................................:.....................:._.............. ..
. . ..a .... .. . .... .. .. . ........... .. .. ... . ... .. .. < _ ......:::.:....::.::...:>:.�::.......::.:...... .:...:::.
o.... .. .. .� .. . ... .............. . ....... ... .. .. .. ........... .. .. . .,...... ... .....:...:..
Q _ . .. . . . ...... . ,:a s ...: :.::..:. ...
. . .. . .. . . . . .. .. . . . .. . ..::::. . .. ...:...::.:...:�:::.:� �<.:i:.>:;>s: �:i�.i:>:s': �_';i::�;:�<:i:��
.. : ,.> ...:...:...:..:......... .....: ... ... .::.>:.: .::.::::.:::,::...:.:: ,::. :,.. :....:::..�:
l 7
... ......_ . :;.;,�... .::: <..:.....,.::::.»:�>
i
...:.:..>::,:::..::� .: . ....................... ... . ,....:.:..:.�>::: .. . . . . ............ . .,....... ... . . >�� ^::;:,:...;:::.� �. . ��
. ....... . ........ . ..................... ,.......,....................: .................... .........,......
m . ......... .. _ . . ..... .. .. . .. ...... .. ............ .... .. .. ......... .. .. ...... ..:...
. . . . ... . .. .. . . < . ... . . . ... ... . . ....
. .. ............ ... .. ,.:.:::..>;:.:....
................. .. ...............,.,>...........,....................,. _ . ,. .
_ .:..:::.::.:..
�>:::>•�.
.,..;>:,� .<,:: _;::;
.. .. . . . . .. .. . . . .. .. . .. . . . . .. . .. _ .. .........:.,:;.>.::>::s.r'::.::
� .
� ..'::r.:::.�::.�::...._::.2::� ..:�....:�::>�..;:
7
........... .. , ..... .. .............. ....................................._._.............._.:. ,� �
..... .. .. ..... . ... . .., ..... . .. ........... .. _ . .. .. ......... ..... .. .. ........ .. ..
. . . . . . . . . . . .... _ . . . .. . .. .. .. . . .. . .. . .. ................ :..:�
. .. .... . . . . . . . . .. . _ . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. _ .. . ..... . ..:..::.::-.�.....:::::":i�i:9i:�.c'.ii�.::i:'):>:>.S:i;i::�:�:�':::::i::: � -
�o ::..'..°.�.:::,. _t
v:::�:y::.�:::i..�:u::.:`.:::.::v.::.:::�:..�::::::o:::.::.:5:�:+.:.::o::::::::::::.:::.:.:.::`::.�::..:C.::::.:::.:.a>:::.::q ::::..:::::.:��::::.::'v::.�::.:...:.�:.�.�:e:..:...::.::::::�::��..:..:._:.:::.:.::.::.:.......... . 4 ,S
�
�
� n �
�
Qi -
0 � �
S
I
/
1 I �
4 - ,
M O
M T
4
C.B
/
I
�
4 - / 'f
� �
L
%i�'y:;::i'�.'v3:.:`::;:;:',;;;;<::{:;i::�:;:1<:;�:.;:'>'�'��;�::;::���>:>^�,;�.fd�:>7::::��:�'.: �? _
...\ : .��. �::>':. �� — _
�, ..o�.:.x�. ..� ` '. .
. : �..x,;: �.:...� : ':��:� :,
..
1 9 0
.... ':a`::�.`:
,. .,.
: .. . . .�x': ;:c . :.
. ._ .. . ..:.... :..:..�,.�x�:,.., ,.'.:,.'�`�;.:.
..:�:�:�:�:�i'::�:��'
.�... .
: . .� . .:�'..: '.�: .: . .�..�:•. ..
:....<:.....: ...:.....:.....:.....>:::..:-..,:.....�...............>,...............:�......... 04
.:,,.:�:.:::,::.:.>. , ...:::..:::..:.::.:.::>.. . .:::.. .:.;,:<::::.:.>.:::.:::.::.;:.,:..>:.>:.»::.,:;:::..>::>:.,.:::;.::.:.;:.<.:<.>::::;::.;:.;>:.»:.>::..:::::,.>:::..._. ... . "�
O i � >.»..:,,::,..,>,:: _. ,:.;:::.:;,;:.:...:>. >::,.>:;::..>.<:>..:::.>:-:.:.;.:,.:»:.>::::::::,:... _
E x. �!c_:..:: v£NUE • 11��
. � P :........� . ...... ...... ,:::...:....:>_:: �� q
......:::,.:...... . .....,..,
....,..: ... . .::..::.
.... _: . ... ... ...::. :,:..� _ � :.:,::.:: .:::.: <:.:r::.>::� ::. .y.x::a<>�:
9 C . ::.>x�». . :...:::.:.::.:::.::... .w.. ........ :'.�i�:::,>.
� :.:.:: ..;:.: .:: ..:::.: <..;...,.>: �.a: � .:: �..W. :::.. ..>.::.::.._..:...:..:. �. ♦ e
.:::..:..:::.a>. .....
�yy� ...x,.: 8 �i
I
,y�j 0
:::c�:��;',.:: .
�: �::�� .,.
::::;����; ^
e
8
o �' t. �
�:.;::.. .. :....> ,r::: �:>. >.>;ii;::>:S'::::q'>'.xx:x . .. �::
:..iYEj52�:�: . :: F3 I I
1�'- .:.>:;: .. _.;i:4..':.::::
:: _.:i:i..:.:+;::�::::?a;�:<_�ii;i:.:�:i�'
� 10 :k;:._: 0 8
K.".
�
,., •
S
1 .�+
L
'� �'.-F:::.:.
I
I L �;
�
:.�.:;::� :. ; ,
e -
\ —
i� --
�a �a
�. N , /26 � ` l/ed N
I e .` 1 ��,.�.�,..''�.;;..�::..,:,: .�i:: ��' Q, 49`d" n c _ Ja[
i �'� / / ; n .>:g' BUTL£R � � \ � yi i
� '- LAND ` � f
i
� z6 � i °C �� n��,, Q o z� ::
,.� � e , ti
� \ W j^ .
e � 8ULU ��. eu�us u.ao �c. ... _ --� Y
�-�99 � I bp. Y �
i t M. R. „� .
Z �, o noy.n .
I �' _
W irt
�p52 43 � b,.» ,n.s!14r
' I . N a � `°6 y ��l!
/" ° � ' 1 - lze9� �35 CYNWOOD _ _ . . '.� .
, I , ` ..., a SO . N RC 1' 4BOUNDARY - WTY � Of _ _. " . � '
�:r�.
.:.. ....... .. .............. ............ ............................................. .. .�._.. \ .,.,.,.... .__.............,. _ _.....__ _.__..... _J._._ ..'.._... _... ....... . . .. .
; ���
��t o �YNwooD �
ALL.1Ml�ICI C���
• �� � �4 Ctty �leeting C6aQQenges i � I �' i
11330 BULLIS ROAD
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262
(213)603�0220
INTER-OFFICE MEMO
DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 1988 FILE N0. ALAMEDA & BUTLER
T0: VICENTE MAS, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITI' DEVELOPMENT
ATTN: DORTHEA TILFORD, ACTING SENIOR PLANNER
FROM: JOSEPH Y. WANG� P.E., DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/ C `�(� "`•'`
CITY ENGINEER �
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19054
CASE NO. 87103
ALAMEDA STREET AND BUTLER AVENUE
Attached are the conditions for the subject Tentative Parcel Map:
JYW:FG:ow
1 �i. Q�.SZ. u r- n ,� �.� ��� � I�t cD�
�� �Cl� �` (�.�-$'� cw�� c� ��-�.�c�e-�
�
�- -�e C� 4,"`o�A2 �
;
V29.150
EXfIIBIT A
. /
�..lt.'.' O�
' �v . �
� ��1� �r� ��
,:�It ; T �'.��.�
� `����'� � ` --�- �A����
�`.� �' C 71330 BULLIS ROAD
b
LYNLVOOD. CALIFORNIA 90262
f?1316C3�0220
JNTgR•C��ICE tYD���tO
DATE: OCTOBER 23, 198L,.
T0: PAT IMPORTUN9, DIRECTOR OF CO"fMUNZTY DE�IELOPMENT
FRO:f: JOSEPH Y. WANG, P.E., DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/���Ln �� •
CITY ENGINEER �
SUBJECT: TENiATIVE PARCEL MAP 16174 (Change to Unit Filing).
Listed below are Engineering's Department revised requirements reflecting
the requested change to unit filing for tentative Parcel Map No. 16174.
COftDITION OF APPROVAL
1. All conditions of the State Map Act and the City's Subdivisioa Ordinance
must be met prior to recordation.
All matters and improvements shall be consistent with the ordinances,
standa'_ds, and procedures of the City's Deve2opment Standards, Engineering
Procedures and Standards, Water Standards, and Planting Standards of the
Department of Parks and Recreation.
�
The devaloper is responsible for checking with staff fcr clari£ication of
these r�quirenents.
2. Submit a Subdivision Guarantee to this office.
The fir.al maos shall be based on field surce}•s. All surveying for .the
proposed development will be done by the developer, including the
establishment of centerline ties. Enclosed with the final maps, the
surveyor's closure sheets.
� 3. Developer shall pay all applicable development feas includir.g drainage,
' sewer, water and parkway trees prior to issuance of ar.y bu;lding permits.
Pay Parcel Map checking fees prior to checkir.g each parcel map im it.
Pay $100 mon�ent checkin� fee prior to recordation of each parcel map unit.
Deposit $50 with the City Engineer to guarantee receip: by City of recorded,
reproducible mylar, parcel map prior to recordation of eacn parcel map unit. �
All,special assessments and utilities or sewer connection fees are to be
paid prior to recordation of each parcel map �nit.
I All requlrements of the serving utilities to be met or guaranteed prior
�
�
i
I
i
I a
1
,
�
• " t ,
;
�
to recordation of each parcel map unit.
Pay Improvement plans checking fees prior to checking. (Street, sewer,.
grading, storm drain, traffic, etc.).
4. Public Impro�e�ents:
The developer shall install all public improvements, as required by the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer prior to issuance of any occupancy
permits for this development. Public improvements shall include, but not
be limited to: Paving, curb and gutter, gutter, spandrels, concrete drive
aproaches, sidewalks, street lights, sanitary sewers, storm drains, water
system, underground utility installations, railroad crossing devices,
signs and markings, and street trees. All changes and repairs in existing
curbs, gutters, and sidewalks and other public improvements shall be paid
for by the developer. if improvements are to be guaranteed, a faithful per-
formance bond shall be posted by the developer to guarantee installation of '
said public improvements and an agreement for completion of improvements
with the City Council shall be entered into. Submit Policy of Insurance
or bond protecting City against damage or injury to persons or property
growing out of; related to,�or resulting from improvements or work. The
Director of Public Works/City Engineer will determine amount and form.
Deposit with the Director of Public WorY.s/City Engineer before commencing
any improvements, a sum estimated by the Director of Public �dorks/City
Engineer to cover cost of inspection of all improvements under his
jurisdiction.
The phasing of the Public Improvements shall be as follows:
Parcel 1
' Bellinger Street - Construct full offsite imp:ovements from Lynwood
Road to an appropriate station south of Parcel 1.
Lynwood Road - Construct full offsite improvements from Bel�inger
' Street to an appropriate station west of proposed
railroad crossing. Construct storm drain extensien
to resolve drainage problem west of proposed rail •
''• road crossing. Construct railroad crossing and ir.-
stall railroad crossing control devices.
i � �
East Alameda - Construct full offsite improvements from Lynwood Road
Street to an appropriate station south of the proposed rail-
� road crossing. Construct railroad crossing and install
railroad crossing control devices.
Parcel 2 and 3
Bellinger Street - Construct full offsite improvements for the remainder
of Bellinger Street from last construction station
I f under Parcel 1 to Butler Avenue.
Lynwood Road - Construct full offsite improvements for the remainder
of Lynwood Road from last construction station of
Parcel 1 to East Al.ameda Street.
�
I
I _
: ,,
-- East Alameda - Construct full offsite improvements for the remainder
Street of East Alameda Street from last construction station
of East Alameda Street to Butler Avenue.
Butler Avenue - Construct full offsite improvements from East
Alamela S�reet to Beiiinger Street. Construct a
storm drain to resolve the drainage proble� at the
southeast corner of the property.
5. Street Plans and Street Grades
Streec plans must be signed by a itegistered Civil Engineer and designed and
drawn,to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer).
The street grades on all streets extending to the boundary of this
development shall be projected through to the nearest arterial street or
existing secondary street in order to insure compatibility with the
development of adjoining land. Unless otherwise approved by the Director
of Public Works/City Engineer, minim� street grades shall be .25%.
i
Prepar�z the following Street Plans:
Parcel 1
Prepare street plans for Bellinger Street from Lynwood Road to Butler Aver.ue.
Prepare street plar.s for Lynwood Road from Bellinger Street to an appropriate
station west of the proposed railroad crossing.
Prepare street plans for East Alameda Street from Lynwood Road to an
appropriate station south of proposed railroad crossing.
Parcel 2 and 3
Prepare street plans for Butler Avenue from East Alameda Street to Bellinger
Street.
Complete street plans for East Alameda Street to Butler Avenue.
6. Grading and Draining:
All grading plans shall be submitted for the approval of the Director of
' Public works/City Engineer and the Director of Community Development. The
grading plans shall include the topgraphy of all contiguous properties and
streets and shall provide for the methods of drainage in accordance with
all applicable City standards. Retaining �aalls and other protective
measures may be required. Offsite drainage ezsements may be necessary.
� The structural section of all parking areas shall be designed by a civil
engineer based upon soils analysis supplied by a recognized and approved
soil engineering firm. The structural section shall be approved by the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer. In the event that the design is
not provided, the minim� structural section that will be approved by the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer, would be 2 inches of asphalt on 4
inches on untreated rock base.
I
I �
� �
Y?
' a
( �
I `
� �
I
1
I
i
�
1 • •
� _
: � • �.
Submit the following items:
Parcel 1
Submit a rough grsding plan and hydrologic calculati.ons for the entire
property and contributin� surrounding areas.
Submit a detail grading plan for Parcel 1.
Submit a Geologic/Soils Report for Parcel 1, signed by a Registered Soils
Engineer.
Prepare storm drain plans for Lynwood Road.
Parcel 2 and 3
Submit a detail grading plan for Parcels 2 and 3.
Submit a Geologic/Soils Report for Parcels 2 and 3, signed by a Register
Soils Engineer.
Prepare storm drain plans to resolve drainage problen at the southeast
corner of the property.
f
7. Sewer
The development shall be provided with public sewers. Design of all
sanitary sewers shall be approved by the Director of Public Works/City
Engineer.
8. Water Systems:
The developer shall construct a water system including water services, fire
hydrants and appurrenances through the development as required by the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer. The developer shall submit a water
system plan to the City of Lynwood Fire Department for fire hydrant locations.
The City will install water meters only. Payment for said meters shall be
made to the City prior to issuance of building permits. The developer shall
install on-site water facilities including stubs for water meters and fire
hydrants on interior and on boundary arterial streets.
All conditions of the Lynwood Fire Department must be met prior to recorda-
tion.
9. Public Easements and Rights of Way:
The developer shall dedicate easements or public rights of way as required
by the City. Where drainage, sewer and other such easements are required,
the minimum easement width shall be ten (10) feet to facilitate maintenance
unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
Parcel 1
- Bellinger Street - Dedicate right-of-way to acco�nodate the realignment
`
!
�
�
t.
1
�
of Bellinger Streer.. (66 feet wide right-of-way).
Lynwood Road - Prepare an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication for a 13
feet wide strip along the south side of Lynwood Road).
(63 feet wide right-of-way).
East Alameda - Dedicate 26 feet of riYht-of-way to accommodate East
Street Alameda Street. (66 feet wide right-of-way).'
Parcel 2 and 3
Butler Avenue - Dedicate 26 feet of right-of-way to accommodate Butler
Avenue. (66 feet wide right-of-way).
10. Sidewalks
.,
Desigr, configuration and locations shall be subject to the approval of the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer and the Director of Community
Develapment. Ramps for physically handicapped persons shall be provided
both on-site and off-site as required by State and local regulations.
11. Traffic Control Devices
The develuper shall pay to the City the cost of installation of any traffic
control devices and street striping necessitated as a result of this
development.
Submitted Traffic Impact Studies are to be approved by the Mrector of
Public Works/City Engineer.
Submit the following iraffic Impact Studies:
Parcel 1
Submit a Traffic Impact Study for Parcel 1.
Parcels 2 an3 3
Submit a Traffic Impact Study for the entire property.
12. Dust Control and Pedestrian Safety:
Prior to the issuance of demolition or grading permits, the developer
shall:
a. Submit a glan indicating safety metheds to be nrovided to maintain
safe pedestrian ways around all areas of construction. This may
require proper and adequate signs, fences, barricades, or other
approved control devices as required by the Director of Public
' Works/City Engineer and the Director of Community Development.
13. Publie Right-Of-Way Vacations:
All public right of way vacations should be processed in conjunction with
the parcel map.
, a
�"s �
i
�
I
1
I
14. City of Compton Review:
The City of Compton should review the parcel map due to the project
area's proxim3ty to the Ci[y of Compton.
I
IIC;�:f���F� I�"�M N0. 3�
CA;�� i�0, ���03. ,,
DATE: February 9, 1988 .
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
' FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
. Community Development Department
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO. 87103
Applicant: Davis Development Company
1400 Bristol StreeY. North
Suite 245
, Newport Beach, CA. 92660
. .
PROPOSAL #
� The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct
a 304,200 square foot warehouse and associated parking at the
northeast : corner of Alameda St. & Butler Avenue, in the
Manufacturing (M) zone.
FACTS
1. Source of Authority
Section 25.'_1.3 of the Lynwood Municipal Code which regulates the
uses permit'�ed within a Manufacturing zone.
,
r�
In this cGse, Sub-Section A.2. states that a Conditional Use
Permit is nE;cessary if the manufacturing deve2opment is a@jacent
to a resid�ntial zoning district. The proposed development is
west of a residential zoning district off Bellinger Avenue.
2, Property Location
' The site is located on the northeast corner of Alameda and Butler
shown as parcel 3 on Tentative Parcel Map 19054.
` 3. Property Size
The site is rectanqular in shape and is approximately 11.45 acres
in size. Parcels 1 and 2(not a part of this proposal) consist
of an additional 6.6+ acres.
4. Existing Land Use
The site is Currently vacant with stockpiles of used tires placed
in various locations of the parcel. The site is surrounded by
the following land uses:
North: Manufacturing East: Residential
South: Manufacturing West: Manufacturing
5. Land Use Designation
General Plan � Zoning
,'
North: Industrial M
� South: Industrial � M
- East: Town House & Cluster Housing R-3
West: 2ndustrial M
DISK-24:87103cup
. .
' „
;.
F g
.�
_ �
� a
. ' ;f
6. Pro�ect Characteristics
The site of 11.45 acres would adequately accomodate the proposed
development of 304,200 square feet. The development includes the
code required number of parking spaces. The improvement would
. consist of a tilt-up warehouse building with a small amount of
square footage in office space. Architecturally, the building ,
features two focal points at the southeast and southwest corners
of the building within the location of the office use by using
, glazing rather than the smooth continuation of the tilt-up
material. Additionally, colors ` and alternative exterior
materials offer contrast to the elevations exposed to the public
right-of-way.
The site is landscaped with a 10-foot setback buffering the
parksng, lot from Butler Avenue; A twenty (20') foot set-back
(fully landscaped) is shown along the Alameda frontaqe.
Interior to the parking area the developer has included
landscaped strips as well as tree we11s throughout the parking
lot. A future rail spur line is indicate3 on the plan and would
not be part of the permit approvals obtained from the City.
4
, , p �,
7. Site Plan Review `
At its regular meeting of January 19, 1988, the Site Plan Review
. Committee approved the proposed project, subject to the
conditions and requirements stated in the attached resolution.
8: Zoning Enforcement History
,
_ Norie of record
Analysis and' Conclusion
1. Consiste with the General Plan
,
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning
designation `� of Manufacturing and with the General Plan
- designation f Industrial.
. 2. Site Suitability
The property is adequate in size and shape to accomodate the
� proposed development relative to the development standards for
set-backs, landscaping and archetectural style.
� 3. -Compatibility '
� The proposed development is compatible with the industrial nature
of the area.
� - 4. Compliarice with Development Standards
In :order to comply with certain fire code requirements, the
developer has had to increase the rear setback of the building. In
, order to regain the lost square footage, the developer proposes
, to utilize the code requirement of 30� compact spaces for
parking.
DISK 24i87103cup � '
�. .
�
' The following are specific findings necessary to qrant the
Conditional Use Permit:
a. The granting, of the proposed Conditional Use Permit will
not adversely affect the comprehensive General P1an
since the zoning and land use designation are
• consistent.
b. The proposed location of the conditional use is in
-;, accord with the objectives of this chapter and the
� purpose of the zone in which the� site is located. Since
the residential use to the east� would be buffered by a
10' landscape set-back and the width of Bellinger
' Avenue.
c. The proposed location of the conditional use and
the conditions under which it would be operated or
� maintained will not be detrimental to the public health,
sa�ety, or welfare, or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity since the
pr�posed construction complies with development
stanflards within industrial areas.
i
. ,
5. Conditic`,ns of Approval
;�
The improv;'ements as proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended;� by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have a
neqative ef`fect on the values of the surrounding properties or
interfere with or endanger the public health, safety or welfare.
6. Environmental Assessment
An environmental evaluation of the proposed development has been
completed. A Negative Declaration will be prepared for the .
development and is on file in the Planning Division.
, Recommendation(s):
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2169:
1. Finding that Conditional Use Permit Case No. 87103 wi11
. not have a significant effect on the environment.
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 87103, subject to
the stated conditions and requirements.
. . � _ � . . . 4 � ..
. i
. t
�
Attachments: �
1. Location Map _
, �, 3. Resolution_ No. 2169
' 4. Site Plan
. DISK 24:87L03cup
� � � . ��;
- . . ,�� ,
�i_
. ,�
{�
87103
RESOLUTION NO. 2169 '
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 87103 TO CONSTRUCT A 304,200
WAREHOUSE IN THE MANUFACTURING ZONE AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF ALAMEDA STREET AND BUTLER
AVENUE, LYNWOOD,CALIFORNIA,IN THE MANUFACTURING
(M) ZONE
WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planninq Commission, pursuant to
law, conducted a public hearing on subject application for a
Conditional Use Permit; and ;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commis;�ion carefully considered
all pertinent testimony offered at the j�ublic hearing; and
�
' WHEREAS, a Conditional Use�Permit is required for
industrial development in the M(Manufacturing) zone adjacent to
residential zoned property.
Section 1
The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as
follows:
A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size
and shape to accommodate the structures, parking,
I, landscaping, driveways and other development
'i features required by the Zoning Ordinance,
�.:
Bti The granting of the proposed Conditional Use
� Permit will not adversely affect the Lynwood
General Plan.
C. The structure as proposed, or modified, subject
to conditions, will not have a negative effect on
the values of surrounding properties or interfere
with or endanger the public health, safety or
welfare.
D. The site will be developed pursuant to the current
zoning requlations and site plan submitted,
reviewed and approved by the Site Plan Review
Committee.
E. The proposed development will add favorably to the
industrial area and will provide additional jobs
_ to residents of the city in concert with the
policies of the General Plan.
F. The proposed development will aid in aesthetically
upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in
fostering other quality developments.
Section 2
The Planning Commission of the�City of Lynwood, based
upon the aforementioned findings and� determinations, hereby
approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 87103, provided the
following conditions are observed and coziplied with at all times:
�'
Disk 8:Reso2169 ! �
' � Community Development Department
1. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement
of Acceptance stating that hejshe has read, understands, and
agrees to the conditions of this resolution within fifteen
(15) days from the date of approval of said resolution by the
Planning Commission. ,
2. All requirements of all City departm€�nts shall be met.
3. All City of Lynwood Municipal CodF� requirements . shall be
��, � � �met. �'--�; �
. PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS:
4. The development shall consist of 304,200 sq. ft. of building
• area.
� 5. A minimum of twelve {12) parking spaces shall be provided.
6. A minim�im of five percent (5�) of the lot shall be landscaped.
i
7. Any moG[ification to the approved plans submitted with this
- applicat`�ion shall be approved by the Planning department.
�_
w
8. All dri��eway and parking areas shall be paved, and shall,have
. sufficient illumination for security.
9. A trash enclosure shall be provided per Building Division '
standards.
10. Construction shall commence within 6 months from the issuance
of the Building Permit.
11. Prior to issuance of the building permit the developer shall
' pay the Lynwood Unified School District fee assessment for
commercial development.
12. The demolition of the site shall include the approved and
• proper disposal of the stockpiled tires currently on the
site.
13. No; building permit shall be issued until the Parcel Map is �
recorded with the office of the Los Angeles County Recorder.
14. The Community Development Department shall have the right of
reasonable inspection, as with any other business within the
City, for the purpose of protecting the general Health,
, Safety and Welfare.
' 15. All electrical and plumbing install<�tion shall be performed
„ by a.licensed contractor.
16. Final building elevations, i:'•;icluding materials of
construction, shall be submitted ?':o and approved by the
Bui�lding Offigial prior to issuance of any building permits.
17." A landscape plan shall be submitted and approved prior to
receiving building permits.
� Disk 8:Reso2169 .
,�
�;
;: .
n
`�
. ;
. ,
�
18. Before any, building permits may be issued, the applicantJ
developer shall pay a fee for new industrial buildings to the
, Lynwood Unified School District, pursuant to Government Code
5eotion 53080.
Fire Department
` 19. Provide calcuated extra hazard sprinkler system including
- provisions for inside hose lines.
20. Smoke and heat vents shall comply wi*h U.B.C. Section 3206.
� ` 21. Access doors shall be installed ever�� 100 lineal feet U.F.C.
81.109.
22. Fire extinguisher requirements shalY be determined by field
, inspection.
• 23. Provide four (4) fire hydrants with 2- 4" end 1- 2 1/2"
outlets:
' a) One each on Alameda and Bellinger, approximately
equal distance from Butler intersection to
existing hydrants to the North.
b) One at each gate on Butler.
24. Tenants�;�Occupants will have to comply with applicable codes
• • relativ� to that occupancy.
r �.
�,
� Public Works Department .
25. Submission and recordation of a parcel map is required.
26. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered
, Civil Engineer.
27. Connect to public sewer. Each buildinq shall be connected
' separately. Construct laterals as necessary.
28. Provide and install, marbelite street pole with light
fixture, underground services and conduits, as required by
, the City Engineer.
29. Underground all utilities.
30. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all
off-site improvements. •
. Section 3. A copy of this Resolution shall be delivered to
• the`applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day�of February, 1988, by
members of the Planning Commission votin� as follows:
AYES•
�.
NOES•
ABSENT: �
.. ABSTAIN:
,
� �� �
r
, »
q
0
. Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
APPROVE AS TO CONTENT: APPP,OVED AS TO FORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
Community Development Dept. General Counsel
t
�.
Disk S:Reso?169
. < --�-�
Y , �::!�`:�L� {itl�l IVO._��..... ,��
DATE: Februar 9 1988 ��' -�
� � C,',Sk fv �. 8'1105 ;
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION "'°@°�
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Commi�nity Development Department ;;
f '"`
P
SUBJECT: COND USE PERMIT-MODIFICATION/CASE N0. 87105
�;
Applicant: Richard Engle
14015 Roblar Road `�
Sherman Oaks, CA. 91423
Proposal ;�
This is a request to modify a Conditional Use Permit (Case No.
86093) to allow alcoholic beverage sales at a retail outlet
located in a neighborhood retail center at 11118 Long Beach
Boulevard. The modification merely alters the outlet name for
the sale of beer and wine.
Source of Authority
Section 25-16.20 of the Lynwood Municipal Code which regulates
the sale of alcoholic beverages. �
Facts
1
1. At its regular meeting of September 9, 1986, the Planning
Commission approved Conditional Use Permit No. 86093 to allow
the off-sale of alcoholic beverages at a 7-Eleven outlet to
be constructed as part of the retail shopping center.
2. On December 16, 1987, the applicant submitted an application
for a modification to the Conditional Use Permit to permit a
change in the ownership of the ABC li'�ense. The original
permit was issued to 7-Eleven (Southlanrl Corporation); this
permit would now be issued to Eddie Jr.'s Mini-market.
3. The Site Plan Review Committee conducted its regularly I
scheduled meeting on January 19, 1988, and approved the
issuance of the permit with the attached conditions.
Issues and Analysis
Subsequent to�the construction of the center the original tenant,
7-Eleven, declined its lease; the new tenant is now Eddie Jr.'s
Mini-market. aIn addition, the physical location of the store
has been changed. The 7-Eleven was originally located at the
most northerT� portion of the site (currently the location of �
the E1 Pollo Loco). The new location of the store front is now in
the in-line stores, closer to Long Beach Boulevard.
� �
Section 25-16�.20 stipulates that there shall be no alcoholic
beverage outlet within 300 feet of a currently operating liquor
store. The physical relocation of the store in its new location
remains approximately 350 feet from B& C Liquor store located on
Imperial Highway, west of Long Beach Boulevard.
I
�
Disk 24:87105cup I
I
I
�
�
i
1 �
I
__ �
The issues concern the physical relocatiun of the store from a
stand-alone building to the in-line sto:°es, and the actual
change in user of the license from 7-Eleven to Eddie Jr.
The original findings and conditions of ap:;�roval for Conditional
Use Permit No. 86093 would remain c;onsistent with the
Modification applied for as Conditional Use Permit 87105.
Recommendation: '
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt the atached Resolution 2170:
1. Finding that the environmental evaluation completed for
Conditional Use Permit is adequate for Modification of
Conditional Use Permit 87105.
2. Approving Modification of Conditional Use Permit 86093, i
subject to the stated conditions of approval.
,,
a
�
�
I
I
I
�
Attachments: ,�
1. Location Map f
2. Site Plan � �
3. Resolution No. 2170 �
�:
I
f
�
DISK 24:87105CUP �
' I
�
i
i
I
2 '
i
I
_ I
. .. .. :: : ..:...:.. . .:: .. ..... :� ... ..�.rr............. . .. � �
---- ---
f: x I51 ING PD�+LR POL f: •.•�.•.� �' �
IB'-�' IB'-�' IB'-�' 18'-�' Id'-�' 1B'-�' � • � .
�:c:a:e:. e.iF �t 16'-6 28' S
T � ' :3:a,.;�.:;i�..s�,,.�V.::. a.e�:�: �
a ll �
N ` ^,a.:::� �:q:iz:i;'fq�;':iE';�r;. � O i
(n � � d::i"�:'..: � ..a.<.: �� � 1� }' .
� " �L V� �y , .�1. �,;yc:3:'r,;.tiY�.:;:a�;.. i ll.�
r LL � V � ..: a;.>c.>.::.: �l. �
(n (n ,j11 N `,#�'i���=:>:.,::.:>:ha:..;; °.;<
N a a a � a S a a O:": �..z,., a a N�
(n = � : �;..::: �'^ ln
N N �0� Q Q ` a N a L p i:s;......: �<::a:m:x:e`:�3..;y_�: �� �0 � � .� �
m N� aD aD �aD a aD �. ::;'�<: ,
� � ::::.�srs'u:::::<::::.::; � p O in
� m m a B e� a B e B�.;..>: . m(� � m� m T
� � � � e B N (9 � B !:z�:::°; .� . �'� �`! N � N ^� i.
` �.:..y<:..::..'l,r..:;. B
ELEC. � N ,, �s::<:<:.:�:. <_ � 7
, .-� .-. .-� ... �h::.:;.>::;:s >•;,�:.. Q� •-•
..`� c:.. `;:Y:NC:.yi: R} �
�:
1 � R,`:: ...:..::."":.. ot:3� �
� i2 �
g:N�:`:
>?.:;io;��;:'si:!.iw:::..: �N• tiV
::.�.::...
G�4 �
H H 'L.]
a � m d N ¢
= tzse ww rwx. p � •-•
r � . -_
� EL POLLO 26 FUTURE KIOSK b �
= TRHNSF ORttER Q
f" �.
W LOCO o H �•� m
0 2234 SF �e t� te � c C C C t � p. W
� �
�_, � a �
� 22 � Q 21 14 I3 � t_� �
�� � -- _...�- ��
M
N
POLE SIGN �r
�
rd
rn
• • a ro rC
L 0 N G B E A C H B L V D. za"��
"� W 11 N 01 O ._ ._
.. . .-- ,.- N ?S N� 00
NET GFOSS . � �.7 A O� n
° � BUILDING RRER 11.907 SF 1{,991 SF LRNO RRER 35,SB7 SF •/- O � o �
q�a aNm
�
ro
x� M�
Uo a1��
H V' .0 N a0
PRRKitaG HEOUlREO+ c� � m �-�-
, PHRKING PROVIOEO� �B � . (N�R.SITEPLiW51
lew�o�+iPS� 3-25-89 RC
. lRNOSCRPE REOUIRED�
� • LRNDSCHPE PROVIOEp�
COnMUN1TY PLRN� � . .. 25' �y0' 75' �. l00' , � � , I,
c �) C
�
RESOLUTION NO. 2170
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
' C�TY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A MODIFICATION OF
CG�NDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86093 TO ALLOW A
CONVENIENCE MARKET WITH SALES OF ALCOHOLIC �
BEVERAGES (BEER AND WINE) AT 11118 LONG BEACH '
BL',VD., LYNWOOD, IN THE C-2A (MEDIUM COMMERCIAL ZONE). �
�� �
)
WHEREAS, the Planninq Commission, pursuant to law, �
conducted a public hearing pertaining to the establishment of a
convenience market selling packaged liquor at the above address;
WHEREAS, the Site Plan Review Committee has reviewed
the plans submitted, performed the necessary investigations and
prepared a written report requesting approval of this application
subject to conditions; I
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the proposal is
exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as
amended;
WHEREAS, the site is located in the C-2A (Medium
Commercial) zone, and convenience market packaged liquor �
is permitted in the C-2A zone, subjeet to the granting of a
Conditional Use Permit.
Section 1. The Planning Commision of the City of
Lynwood DOES HEREBY RESOLVE that said proposed amendment should
be adopted for the following reasons and findings: �
A. The proposed development:is consistent with the I
adopted General Plan, iri that the General Plan
designation for the site ys Commercial, and the
proposal will not advrrsely affect adjacent
property or create a ni�isance to surroundinq
properties. r I
B. The proposed development will be of an architec-
tural and visual quality and character which will
harmonize with and enhance the surrounding area.
C. The proposed development will not interfere with
' the movement of pedestrian traffic along the
a commercial street. I
D`. The proposal will not contribute to undue pro-
€ liferation of such uses in the area or interfere
" with, or endanqer the public health, safety or �
f welfare. I
�
E� No packaged liquor store is located within three-
hundred (300') feet of the proposed use. I
F. The site will be served by streets adequate in I
width and improved as necessary to carry the kind
and quantity of traffic such use will generate. I�
!
G. The site will be developed pursuant to the current ,
�
zoning regulations and plans submitted and approved I
by the Site Plan Review Committee.
I
DISK D-11:RES02170 '
�
' �
(
I
�
'j
�
Y
Sectic 2. The Planning Commission of the City of
Lynwood, based upon the aforementioned findings and
determinations, hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 87105,
provided the following conditions are observed and complied with ,
at all times:
Community Deveopment Department
1. All requirements of all City Departments shall be met.
2. All City of Lynwood Municipal Codes and Zoning Ordinance '
requirements shall be met.
3. The applicant shall sign a Statement of Acceptance statinq
that he/she understands, and agrees to the conditions of
approval by the Planning Commission within fifteen (15) days
� from the date of approval.
Planning Division
4. All signs.shall be erected in conformance with the City of
Lynwood Sign Ordinance; permits will be required.
5. Parking areas shall be sufficiently illuminated to provide
security; any artificial light shall be designed to reflect
away from adjoining properties.
6. Sales of alcoholic beverages shall be limited to beer and
wine.
7. "Sophisticate" magazines shall be located for sale only
behind the counter and shall be stored in racks covered by
modesty panels.
8.. Exterior public telephones may not be located on the
` property.
9. Video ,game machines, or arcade machines may not be located
at the':business.
� i
y
� ,
; Fire Department �
10. Provid` approved 2AlOBC portable fire extinguishers; aisles I
shall comply with the Uniform Building Code (UBC). '
i
I
Section 3. Acopy of this Resolution shall be delivered �
to the applicant. �
�
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
Disk D-11:Reso2170 i
' I
I
�i
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day Of February, 1988, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Lucille Kanka, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROV�D AS TO EORM:
Vicente L. Mas, Director Henry S. Barbosa
Community Development Dept. General Counsel �
I
�
d,
I
I
I
I
I
I
�
i
I
�
I
DISK D-11:RES02170 �
I
,:.. -
DATE: February 9, 1988 ,
TO: i PLANNING COMMISSION
i
FROM: ; Vicente L. Mas, Director
� Community Development Director
SUBJECT: DENSITY BONUSES/INCENTIVES IN
MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS
Purpose
To establish regulations to allow density bonuses of twenty-five
(25%) percent in exchange for superior development amenities in
the multiple family residential zones.
Source of Authority
Government Code Section 65915 provides that when a developer of
housing agrees to construct at least twenty-five (25�) percent of
the total units of a housing development for persons and families
of low and moderate income, a City shall either (1) grant a
density bonus or (2) provide other incentives of equivalent
financial value.
Section 25-4.5 b- Lynwood Municipal Code
. Facts ..
The current regulations of the Lynwood Niunicipal Code provides
that a density bonus may be granted for each increment of 6,000
square feet above the minimum lot size established for any
I I residential zone, as an incentive for merging smaller parcels
into one large lot. Further, additional dwelling units may be
( permited in the R-2 and R-3 zones as incentives toward providing
low and moderate income housinq at the rate of thirty (30$)
I percent above the basic density.
1
Issues and Analysis
The proposed.amendment would repeal the density bonus for "large
lots develop ents," and restate and modify those provisions for,a
density bonus� relatinq to affordable housing for low and moderate
income househ�olds, including senior citizens.
�
The proposed ordinance would decrease the density bonus in the
4 ,�ynwood Municipal Code for low and moderate income households
I from thirty (30�) percent to twenty-five (25�) percent as
required by state law.
e
� In the event the ordinance is adopted, the density bonus would
� only be allowed in exchange for superior development amenities
I that contribute to the general welfare. Amenities or special
features in the R-2 and R-3 zones which may be reguired are:
, 1. Usuable open space per dwelling unit;
� 2. Off-street parking provided from other than a major or
i minor highway where feasible, i.e., side street access;
I
i
� Disk 10-1:Density
I
i
I
i
a �
3. Subterranean parking
4. Play areas
5. Decks, gazebos
6. Swimming pool, spa, jacuzzi
7. other recreational facilities
The basic intent of the density bonus is to create, preserve, and
enhance residential areas for a full range of housing types and
income levels.
t
I
I
(
I
�
I
I
�
' I Disk 10-1:Density
I •
,
;`
'
�
I '
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL' OF THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD AMENDING CHAPTER 25, THE OFFICIAL ZONING
ORDINANCE, WITH RESPECT TO DENSI;TY BONUSES IN THE
MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Sections 25-4.5 b 7 and 25-4.5 b 8 are hereby
deleted in their entirety.
SECTION 2. Section 25-4.5b is hereby amended to read as
follows: ,
"b.. Special Requirements
»
- "7.�Densitv Bonus.
r
"A. In order to encourage the provision of housing for
low-and moderate-income households and senior
citizens, an applicant for a residential
development may request and , the Planning
Commission shall grant, with appropriate findings,
an increase of at least twenty-five percent (25o)
above the highest density of the applicable
General Plan residential category, if at least
twenty-five (25$) of the units in the development
are restricted to the rental or purchase by low-
and moderate-income households or senior citizens.
The density bonus shall apply to housing
developments consisting of five (5) or more
dwelling units.
As an alternative, or in addition to awarding a
, density bonus, the Commission may elect to grant
other incentives, which may include variations to
the development standards contained in Section
25-4.5 of this Chapter.
"B. Prior to. the issuance c>f a certificate of
occupancy for any dwelling,unit in a development
for which density bonus units have been awarded or
incentives have been receiv�d, the developer shall
identify the restricted unit`s and shall enter into
a written agreement with the City to guarantee for
ten (10) years the continued use and availability
to low and moderate income households or senior
citizens.
I "The terms and conditions of such agreement
i • shall run with the land which is to be developed,
� shall be binding upon the successor in interest of
i
I the developer and shall be recorded in the Office
� of the Los Angeles County Recorder.
,
� ,
Disk 10-1:Densord
�
, f
{
�
I
.. • `
�
"If federal, state, county or city funds are utilized,
such agreement shall comply with the appropriate
regulations.
"The agreement shall include the following
�, provisions:
�
"'1. The developer shall give the City the ,
��, continuing right-of-first refusal to
� purchase or lease any or all of the
" designated units at the fair market value.
"2. The deeds to the designated units shall
contain a covenant stating that the
developer or his/her successor in interest
shall not sell, rent, lease, sublet, assign,
or otherwise transfer any interests for same
without the written approval of the City
confirming that the sales price or rental
schedule of the units is consistent with the
limits established for low-and-moderate
income households and senior citizens, which
shall be related to the Consumer Price Index.
"3. The City shall have the authority to enter
into such other agreements with the
developer and with the renters or purchasers
of the dwelling units, as may be necessary
' to assure that the required dwelling units
are continuously occupied by eligible
households.
"C. The certificate of occupancy for�a density bonus unit
shall automatically expire upon vacation of the unit.
Prior to the reissuance of'a certificate of occupancy
for the unit, the Director' of Community Development
shall determine that it wil.l be occupied pursuant to
the requirements of this Ch�ipter.
�:
"D. Density bonus units shall' be generally dispersed
. thoroughout a residential development and shall not
differ in appeararice from any other units in the
project."
SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. '
If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,
clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance, or the
application thereof to any person or place, is for any
reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court or competent jurisdiction, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions of this ordinance or its application to other
persons or places.
i
�
�
1
I
i
�
i Disk 10-1:Densord
j
I
I
The City Council hereby declares that it would have
adopted this ordinance, and each section, subsection,
subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion
thereof, irrespective of the fac`� that any one or more
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or
port or the application thereof to any person or
place, be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City
held on the day of , 1988, and
finally adopted and ordered published at a meeting
of said Council held on the day of ,
1988,.by the following vote:
� AYES:
NOES:
' ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PAUL R. RICHARDS II
MAYOR
ATTEST:
ANDREA HOOPER
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
I
I
� Director Henry S. Barbosa
i Vicente L. Mas,
Community Development Dept. General Counsel
i
�
I
�
1
� �
I ` �!
� �
�
I �
� Disk 10-1:Densord
�,
i
�
i
I
l