HomeMy Public PortalAbout1993.08.04 ANN - Rio VistaTITLE: %v \v 5Jc FnnediI''
DATE:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
PHONE:
Exhibit # Description
/
3
Marv2om 1171 t3Vo2._ ,5117 ►rrl
/fl Env cm 6(J 4><l1C?4L-451)/Ekd
d sT--AF
l 67)1 D F72.661 / -T'/ N -TO 4flt1NtST` Tb i2
Memo ON m 77N
,S
I401Exx-nom 2Ciiity1
Co
/Y1ginO ne.om (V0P-t77 -/ n Gt 6P -gy
7
,N mb Farm') imp TnR- roAt/
F.
5^Ai't F / 0oRI-
t o
-jn/v1
0120. a F- /1 N145x
/ /
I__'__
A-FF-1TJ Aal i i c:DP= 1-i A7-,1 is,. _ .1
12_
N6/7c . C) Fv'E3 L1 c___ M2. I N L '
13
f
MOM-) i7vrn Jim pf .SoA.l
/4
InErn0 Fa -Gm fir -►Kilo Ta 17/Y)lN61-e_.
/ 5
rV-J 61TinAl Aril 3T'flN -I- tt.) A1tt S
-f2S
.17i
1'7
LETT r2 2 rn. T7r77.2,1u rw1\-- DNS
1/
SONQ-S
Lr----r-1"F-- rincNN. 5t-A-K1 }- c.t)-Pre1.-N
19
FiZt)M C,1SF E N!2°3-/•1 P--.V---
Lg-r-r-6---2
}.ss
Publisher's Affidavit of Publication
STATE OF IDAHO
County of Valley
I, Ramona A. George, being duly sworn and say, I am the receptionist
of The Central Idaho Star -News, a weekly newspaper published at McCall, in
the County of Valley, State of Idaho; that said newspaper is in general
circulation in the county of aforesaid and is a legal newspaper; that the
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, a copy of which is enclosed hereto and is a
part hereof, was published in said newspaper once a week for one consecutive
week in the regular and entire issue of every number there of during the period
of time of publication, and was published in the newspaper proper and not in a
supplement; and that publication of such notice began August 19, 1993 and
ed August 19, 1993.
Subscribed and sworn before me day of August, 1993.
STATE OF IDAHO
COUNTY OF VALLEY
On this 19th day of August, in the year of 1993, before me, a Notary
Public, personally appeared Ramona A. George, known or identified to me to
be the person whose name subscribed to the within instrument, and being by
me first duly sworn, declared that the statements therein are true, and acknowl-
edged to me that she executed the same.
Tom Grote
Notary Public for Idaho
Residing at McCall, Idaho
Commission Expires: 1999
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
On SEPEMBER 9,1993, at 8:00 P. M. or as
soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the
CITY COUNCIL of the City of McCall will
hold A PUBLIC HEARING at 216 E. Park
Street, McCall, Idaho (that is, at City Hall, in
the American Legion meeting room) TO CON -
I SIDER THE APPROPRIATE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION OF VARI-
OUS PROPERTIES IN THE AREAS included
in, the areas surrounding, and the areas sur-
rounded by RIO VISTA, PINE TERRACE,
and VALLEY VIEW SUBDIVISIONS, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ON EX-
HIBIT "A", in connection with the possibility
of the annexation to the City of some or all of
these areas.
Dated: August 16, 1993
Arthur J. Schmidt, City Clerk
Exhibit "A"
The lands which may require reclassifica-
tion on the city zoning map consist of one or
more of the following described areas, or any
combination thereof, or any combination of
parts thereof:
AREA ONE
Commencing at a 5/8" mbar marking the S
1/16 Comer common to Sections 7 and 8, T. 18
N., R. 3 E., B.M., a point on the existing City
Limits of the City of McCall, Valley County,
Idaho, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING:
Thence, N. 894 44' 19" W., 415.60 feet
along the northerly boundary of the SE 1/4 of
the SE 1/4 of said Section 7 and such City
Limits,
thence, S. 0413' 05" W.,1322.49 feet to the
line common to Sections 7 and 18, T. 18 N., R.
3 E., B.M., City of McCall, Valley County,
Idaho,
thence, N. 894 56' 10" E., 718.11 feet to the
1 Section Comer common to said Sections 7, 8,
17 and 18,
thence, south, along the westerly right-of-
way of Boydstun Street to its intersection with
L.thenortherly delft -of -way of West Valley Road,
thence, S. 04 02' 46" E., 35 feet to the
l northwest comer of Mccall Industrial Park, as
shown on the official plat thereof on file in the
office of the Recorder of Valley County, Idaho,
in Book 8, on Page 11 of Plats,
thence, S. 04 02' 46" E., 662.01 feet to the
southwest comer of said McCall Industrial
Park,
thence, N. 894 56' 10" E., 718.11 feet to the
southeast comer of said McCallIndustrial Park,
thence, S. 0410' 00" W., 993.45 feet to the
C-N-NW-SW 1/256comer of said Section 17,
thence, S. 894 05' 52" E., 1337.13 feet to the
C-N-NE-SW 1/256 comer of said Section 17,
thence, N. 04 10' 42" E., 330.99 feet to the
1 C-E-W 1/64 comer of said Section 17,
thence, S. 894 52' 18" E., 668.60 feet to a
brass capmarking the Center l/4 Comer of said
Section 17,
thence, continuing S. 894 52' 18" E., 850
feet, more or less, along the east -west center
section line of said Section 17, to its intersec-
tion with the left bank of the North Fork of the
Payette River, a point on the existing City
Limits of the City of McCall,
thence, northerly and westerly along such
City Limits and said left bank to its intersection
with the extended north boundary of Govern-
ment Lot 10, Section 8,
thence, N. 894 57' 30" W.; 1,700 feet, more
or less, along said north boundary and such
City Limits to the Point of Beginning.
AREA TWO
Commencing at the northwest comer of
Mccall Industrial Park, as shown on the official
plat thereof on file in the office of the Recorder
of Valley County, Idaho, in Book 8, on Page 11
of Plats; thence, N. 04 02' 46" W., 35 feet to the
northerly right-of-way of West Valley Road,
the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING:
Thence, S. 894 59' 00" W., 1360 feet, more
or less, along said northerly right-of-way to the
westerly right-of-way of Wisdom Road,
thence, S. 04 01' 59" W., 1395 feet, more or
less, along said westerly right-of-way extended
to the southerly right-of-way of West Valley
Road,
thence, S. 894 52' 39" E., 35 feet, more or
less to the northwest comer of Amended Pine
Terrace Addition No. 1, as shown on the offi-
cial plat thereof on file in the office of the
Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, in Book 7,
on Page 54 of Plats,
thence, S. 04 20' 44" E., 1,750.03 feet to the
southwest comer of Lot 8, said Amended Pine
Terrace Addition No. 1
Thence, Easi, 668.12feet to the southeast
comer of said Lot 8, on the westerly right-of-
way of Coy Road,
thence, S.192 52' 20" E., 183.85 feet along
said westerly right-of-way to its intersection
with the centerline of Williams Creek,
thence, easterly, along said creek center
line to the center line of the. North Fork of the
Payette River,
thence, southerly to the high watermark on
the left bank of said North Fork of the Payette
River,
thence, easterly and northerly along the
high watermark of said left bank to its intersec-
tion with a line parallel to and 520 feet south of
the line common to Sections 17 and 20, T. 18
N., R. 3 E„ B.M., Valley County, Idaho,
thence, easterly to the southwest comer of
the existing City Limits,
thence, N. 02 42' 00" W., 520.00 feet along
the existing City Limits to the line common to
said Sections 17 and 20,
thence, West along said common line to its
intersection with the high water mark on the
left bank of the North Fork of the Payette River,
thence, northerly along said high water
mark to itsintersectionwith the east boundary
of Govemment Lot 6, said Section 17,
thence, north, 1360 feet, more or less, along
said east boundary to the CE 1/16 Comer of
said Section 17,
thence, N. 892 52' 18" W., 1320 feet, more
or less, to a brass cap marking the Center it
Corner of said Section 17,
thence, N. 89252' 18" W., 668.60feet to the
C-E-W 1/64 corner of said Section 17,
thence, S. 02 10' 42" W., 330.99 feet to the
C-N-NE-SW 1256 comer of said Section 17,
thence, N. 892 05' 52" W., 1337.13 feet to
the C-N-NW-SW 1256 comer of said Section
17,
thence, N. 0210' 00" E., 993.45 feet to the
southeast comer of said McCall Industrial Park,
thence, S. 892 56' 10" W., 718.11 feet to the
southwest comer of said McCall Industrial
Park,
thence, N. 02 02' 46" W., 697.01 feet to the
Point of Beginning.
AREA THREE
Commencing at a brass cap marking the E
1/16 Comer common to Sections 18 and 19, T.
18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., Valley County, Idaho,
being the northwest comer of Valley View
Subdivision No. 3, as shown on the official plat
thereof on file in the Office of the Recorder of
Valley County, Idaho, in Book 7 , on Page 28 .
of Plats, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING:
thence, along the boundary of said Valley
View Subdivision No. 3,
S. 0249' 52" W., 2546.61 feet; S. 44228' 57"
E., 70.32 feet; S. 892 47' 45" E., 607.03 feet to
the southeast comer of said Valley View Sub-
division No. 3,
thence, along the boundary of Valley View
Subdivision No. 2, as shown on the official plat
thereof on file in the Office of the Recorder of
Valley County, Idaho, in Book 7, on Page 8 of
Plats,
continuing S. 892 47' 45" E., 290.00feet; N.
152 33' 16" E., 91.13 feet; N. 402 39' 22" E.,
231.10 feet; N. 21211' 39" E., 262.77 feet; N.
342 30' 59" E., 392.19 feet; N. 822 26' 03" E.,
250.73 feet; N. 802 05' 32" E., 306.62 feet; N.
742 06' 31" E., 306.88 feet to the southeast
corner of said Valley View Subdivision No. 2,
thence, S.79227' 13" E., 1396.08 feet along
the southerly boundary of Valley View Subdi-
vision No. 1, as shown on the official plat
thereof on file in the Office of the Recorder of
Valley County, Idaho, in Book 6, on Page 14 of
Plats, to the right bank of the North Fork of the
Payette River,
thence, perpendicular to said right bank,
southeasterly to the high watermark on the left
bank of said Payette River,
thence, northerly along said high water
mark to a point perpendicular to the mouth of
Williams Creek,
thence, westerly, along the center line of
Williams Creek to its intersection with the
westerly right-of-way of Coy Road,
thence,N.19252'20" W., 183.85 feet along
said right-of-way to the southeast comer of Lot
8, Amended Pine Terrace Subdivision No. 1, as
shown on the official plat thereof on file in the
Office of theRecorderof Valley County, Idaho,
in Book 7 , on Page 54 of Plats,
thence, West, 668.12 feet to the southwest
corner of said Lot 8,
thence, S. 02 20' 44" E., 831.90 feet to the
Point of Beginning. 1t8/19
AUGUST 23, 1993
TO: MCCALL CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR
RE: UPDATE TO STAFF REPORT, RIO VISTA AREA ANNEXATION
The following update is at the request of the Council and in part
a response to comments that arose during the hearing on the
matter before the Planning and Zoning Commission.
I. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: •
The City's Comprehensive Plan, adopted in August 1976,
addresses broad land uses. This general vicinity is identified
as Area II, Site B and the Plan states:
"Topographic variations, close proximity to Payette River,
the presence of a country road, and the sewage treatment
plan south of the site, all contribute to a high rating for
residential land use."
Under the final section called "Public and Private Actions" the
plan notes that the City of McCall should:
"consider annexation of additional lands as development
pressure grows in areas .adjacent to the City and thus assure
their development in accordance with the General Plan."
The Plan is uncertain in terms of detail of which areas to be
annexed. A broad application of this direction is expected as
conditions and circumstances warrant, based upon your judgement
and discretion.
II. TAX IMPACTS:
The City Treasurer has provided the attached comparison for
outlining the tax impacts upon various types of properties as
requested by the Council on August 12.
III. ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENCE:
Attached is correspondence which has been received to date
in addition to the testimony in the file submitted for the
Planning and Zoning Commission's hearing.
Bud v.,vC
t
City of McCall
Changes in Property Tax Obligations
Brought about by Annexation.
< A >< B >< C ><
Property
Before After Before After Before A ter
MV-Land $35,000 $35,000 $35.000 $35.000 $45.000 $45,000
MV-Improvements $55,000 $55.000 $90,000 $90.000
Total Market Value $35,000 $35.000 $90.000 $90.000 $135,000 $135.000
Adjusted Market Value $35.000 $35.000 $62,500 $62,500 $135,000 $135,000
District Rate
Valley County 0.003030 $106.05 $106.05 $189.38
MD School Dist 0.003980 $139.30 $139.30 $248.75
McCall Mem. Hosp. 0.000800 $28.00 $28.00 $50.00
Rural Fire Dist
(Improvements Only) 0.001352 $0.00 $0.00 $37.18
Cemetary 0.000030 $1.05 $1.05 $1.88
Sewer District 0.000421 $14.74 $14.74 $26.31
City of McCall 0.004933 $172.66
Total 0.014546 $289.14 $461.79 $553.49
Percent Change 59.71%
PROPERTY A is an unimproved lot with an assessed market value of $35.000
PROPERTY B is a lot valued at $35.000 with improvements (Home)
valued at $55.000 in the Sewer District and with a Homeowners'
exemption.
PROPERTY C is a lot valued at $45.000 with improvements (Home)
valued at $90.000, not in the Sewer District and no Homeowners'
exemption.
PROPERTY D is a lot valued at $55.000 with improvements (Home)
valued at $135.000. in the Sewer District and with a Homeowner's
exemption.
$189.38
$248.75
$50.00
$0.00
$1.88
$26.31
$308.31
$824.63
48.99%
Before
$55.000
$150.000
$205,000
$130.000
D >
After
$55.000
$150,000
$205,000
$130.000
$409.05 $409.05 $393.90 $393.90
$537.30 $537.30 $517.40 $517.40
$108.00 $108.00 $104.00 $104.00
$121.68 $202.80
$4.05 $4.05 $3.90 $3.90
$54.73 $54.73
$665.96 $641.29
$1,180.08 $1.724.36 $1.276.73 $1,715.22
46.12%
24,e46/(/
,t) te, /06-s—
ked(./.641 g363g
ANL eeat
air
%.2 7 V z .
D,ti
atie9eiy�3 y
V,A ,
ciapt tin-pi7= Wv: /7 % Le,-ILir2ne ct=491
2/ f4 V s
,&_tie; 1,144 ; eti c_t4._),LA,a_;,atzt-azi
�. / 0(/ t-
r
�z Mee , 6/
SZ )1- a i ( mac•
.4/ , OW -An I 217piTuATy C n fps ,/nt i, 4 At du
/t F24,--c-eze4ar.d • LI..
urcam- C.r c ti
D ' v`
'U v� / D( ah/1 v2r;v1 , a at 4, 9 Ad74 2,7i.-
Zit;'6 0 2 . aY n.,,
ot lafte jA./r"
Lb1:15475:kvi
3 i
a '
Ken Busby '.
Rio Vista Propwrty Owner
August 11 , 1993
Mayor and Council
City of McCall
P. O. Box 1065
McCall , Idaho SZ638
Dear Mayor and Council ;
I am in favor of the annexation of the Rio Vista Subdivisions'
have �
h owned �n un�w�vel�ped lot NO,. in Rio Subdivision No- 1
1�7�� This lot is typical o+ many other undev�loped �o±�
since ^ streets of �hula St. , C Y
�
along the river on thecuI6esac stanm-tical
Drive �nd Memo Circle which canno� be dmveloped in a prac
' i l manner with�ut the benwfit 0f Jervicss which
the
and econ�m ca
annexation can bring abau±,
I believe the community residents in Rio Vistai that
have expressed rejection mf the annexation are not keeping a long
f thecommunity in mind with this approach.
T�e
term «��� of
McCall area � t� great a value to uut
natur�� quality r - 6 ervioas
- - -' - - infrastructure an s
utilize the benefits of the available -
which are appropreate f*ur a growing connwuntty'
Your Open Letter to th` Citizens of McoaII published inthaStar
News on August 26, i% all about water quality imprqvemenrs that
-
1n the Rio Vista
u�� �e d��n�� The most �igniftcant problemnd
m ^ f water quality. With aQ�ng a
Subdivisions is also an issue o w ' t t
inadequate �eptic systems in the area, watvr quality will no ge
iat sewer �n6 water services.better without a�pro�r e se The
t and futur�
Annexation will bravidon benefits for all pr*sen increase
residents in b��th the near term and the long torm' n�r
Any bargain
property taxes ao� a result of the ann*�»ati,n will bet a "��
� d a small price to pay for the many b*on�yfit� arid quality
improvements in roadz and services.
In 1883 I granted a sewer eauement on my property to thQ Payetts
L k�oo Water and Sewer District . In 1�90, c�rr�s�ondenc� �x �n R.
M confirmed their desire to retain
Ted Whiteman , District �``�y�' � �H �%�o indicated tna�
the easement for future consideration. 6 maintenance
the City Of is resppnsib1e for operation an would b� the
system i� Rio Vi5ta, Ond � �/hey wo
Of the existing sewer
logical choice tq serve the rest of Rio Vista.
Vista Subdivisions �r� �efinitelY par� o+ the City of
The Ri� s �
McCall .al1 . please complete the re1ati r o /ship by passing the
annexation.
Th k fOr your consideration,
- - -
' Ken Busby
' ^�
.
`
--------
"
P a y e t t e L a k e s W a t e r . a n d
S e w e r D i s t r i c t
P . O . B o x 1 5 6 6
M c C a l l , I d a h o 8 3 6 3 8 .
N o v e m b e r 2 2 , 1 9 8 3
"
"
a r P r o p e z t y . 0 W n e r : .
` ` ��" : : , " . . " i e s . o f y o u r e a s e m e n t p r e p a r e d b y . t h e D i s t r i c t "
��
: ' , ' ��n c 7 , o s a d a x e : t w o c a P
; t o r e y o u r ' e o n a i . d e r a . t i . o n : ' . ��" .
.
= A ' y o u * " m a y b a n e ' h e a r d , t h e P a y e t t e ' L a k e s W a t e r a n d
d e S e e D i s t r i c t
. . h i s " , r e c e i v e d ' " a p p r o x i m a t e l y . $ 4 . 4 m i l l i o n t o c o m p
o n
; ; o f ' a l l - t h e " s e w e r ' l i n e s ; w i t h i n t h e D i s t r i c t .
T h i s " g r a n t . i s f r o m t h e ' F a r m e r . H o m e A d m m i s a t i e n x a z . e r - a . a ' d i r e c t
" . : " . . r . e s u l t , o e t h e " J o b s B i l l a p p r o v e d b y C o n g r e s s
P a r t . o f ' t l h e ' C o n g r e s s i o n a l m a n d a t e w h i c h a c c o m p a n i e s t h i s g r a n t i s "
. : " " t h a t t h e S e w e r D i s t r i c t m u s t i m m e d i a t e l y i m p l e m e n t t h i s ' s e w e r p r o j e c t
" O z . . . l o s e . t h e f u n d s . . " . . ` .
"
. . F o x " t h i s r e a s o n w e m u s t . r e c e i v e a s i g n e d c o p y o f t h e e n c l o s e d
r s t ��.
. . e a s e m e n t w i t h i n ' . 7 d a y s : Y o u r i m m e d i a t e c o n s i . d e r , a t i o n , o f t h i s o f f e r
. : . m i l l i - h e l p t h i s . p r o j e c t g o f o r w a r d o n s c h e d u l e .
. Y o u w i . ] . i " b e ' c o n t a c t e d b y a n a g e n t o f t h e S e w e r D i s t r i c t i n a f e w
. d a y s ' w h o . w i l l b e p r e p a r e d t o a n s w e r a n y q u e s t i o n s y o u m a y h a v e , o r
. " y o u , m a y . c o n t a c t ' t h e S e w e r ' D i s t r i c t O f f i c e a t " 2 0 8 - 6 3 4 - - 2 8 9 6 ' . "
r a n t ' t h e e a s e m e n t , a l l p a r t i e s n a m e d i n
. " " T o a c c e p t ' t h i s o f f e r a n d g n a n d
' t h e , : e a s e m e n t w h o h o l d a n ' " i r i t e r e s t i n t h e p r o p e r t y r o u s t s i g n
h a v e " t h e i r s i g n a t u r e s n o t a r i z e d .
P l e a s e r e t u r n y o u r ' s i g n e d a n d n o t a r i z e d e a s e m e n t t o R i c k
M a l l , r I ,
P a y e t t e L a k e s W a t e r a n d S e w e r , D i s t r a c t , P . O .
8 3 6 3 8 .
W e d o a p p r e c i a t e y o u r e a r l y c o n s i d e r a t i o n . o f t h i s e a s e m e n t .
' Y o u r s v ��y ��l t r u l y ,
"
"
d i c k M a 7 . 1 0
P a y e t t e L - 1
R M : a p :
a t o r
a n d S e w e r D i s t r i c t ,
`3ti FJl 73 VJO • J ( nl-1 n��+vn ����. w� +.. • -
Payette Lakes Water and .
Sewer District
P.O. Box 1566
McCall, Idaho, 83638
(208) 634-4111
May 31, 1990
Kenneth B. Busby
927 Van Nuys St.
San Diego, CA - 92109
Dear Mr. Busby:
The question which you asked concerning the District's easement along
your property was referred to the District's attorneys and to the
District Board of Directors at the regular meeting of May 4, 1990.
The legal staff advised the Board, after researching the statutes, that
- ll valid and would
the easement which you granted to the District is spy
continue to be valid unless the Board chose to conveyor nullify the
easement in some manner. The Board generally felt that it would be pru-
dent to retain the easement for future consideration of construction if
indeed that ever materializes.
The Board also felt, however, that if the affected property owner wishes
to justify the need for easement nullification, they would consider each
request on a case by case basis. With that in mind the District Board
directed me to ask you to further explain your request for easement
nullification. Please indicate in your request, (1) What your specific
plans are and how they are directly impacted by the existence of the
easement. (2) Please show with a map how the easement will interfere
with your building plans - also consider zoning set backs. I have been
informed by the Impact Planning & Zoning Commission Chairperson that a
setback of 50' from the North Fork of the Payette River is the rule for
river and lakefront lots. It ie my understanding that the sewer easement
falls well within this dimension and may moot the issue of interference.
To update you onthe background, I researched the Rio Vista issue and
recorded the following chronology: After a class action lawsuit filed
by some residents in Rio Vista Subdivision, a decision was rendered by
a District Judge which in effect stated that the Payette Lakes Water and
Sewer District improperly included Rio Vista Subdivision within its
boundaries and consequently had no authority to tax these :roperties for
Bond Indebtedness. The PLWSD Board with concurrence of the State Tax
Commission then applied this decisionto all properties within the Rio
Vista Subdivision and on 4/13/84 voted to deanrnex Rio Vista Subdivision.
The end result is that the Payette Lakes Water and. Sewer District does
not have taxing authority in the Subdivision and consequently did not
expend funds to construct a sewer system in an area outside its boundaries.
The Rio Vista Subdivision was then removed from service consi.deratien by
.tale Sewer District.
Payette Lakes Water and
Sewer District
P.O. Box 1566
McCaII, Idaho 83638
(208) 634.4111
Recently it has been learned that either developmental pressures or
regulatory directives may again focus on achieving central sewer service
for those unserved areas of Rio Vista. Since the City of McCall is
reso-nsible for operation and maintenance of the existing sewer system
in Rio Vista, it seems to me that t ey woi:ld be the logical choice or,
mu� lities to serve lie rest of 'moo Vista. I do not know what the
city position is
regarding
this
If
furtherire in
for-
mation orwish follow .through yourrequest,pleasecontactour
office.
Sincerely,
R. Ted Whiteman
District Manager
RTW/jf
cc file (Rio Vista)
Name
Sign Up to Speak in OPPOSITION of the Annexation Here
Please Print Clearly
Address
,,13-ray /L%/r',.os- /(2i6 Nisi
oY'/7„,'el`) Lid 1 ` t InA 1 941 /C I a t/ I S 7 T�. I��`�1 1 -i
-)
(--\ C:5 vv,1/4:6 11/4. e7A((.4" '/
ado Ut.ivQ )
-IYILko Bab,
<clu -`h.,,,, or\ 6\a - C ;4 its
)1/061.06ILIf
(9'10 2:�-�
1
i
a
J
/06c-
44
C/L--
dam CL
apt AA--
,
01,714wob
/Kee_op,_ca,t4iztA.A_.
SZA
4-eZth-.
7.27 Va-rt_ )U4/
D42-C4 Qz,'d7
OiL
vo:ti
.AAiv'sf P/14,-x414:-ne
AL2t
S4artz.
-411.47,
, _ VC,ce 1sar46
4-60-A-e /14t-paelah
thliAil Apitevpii7zA_L.
ctL
An2eA4,Z/A-P7
ceir-xleJZ-
MANcki arhrrt&J/et-t/Dti:v142,
""-1' f2L0 c,41-k
rvi- AA-A/kat
akk_44-6,
4// VZ_iLd-A4i7e4-
/7:4 /141-11&1)747
/L.
AUGUST 23, 1993
TO: MCCALL CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR
RE: UPDATE TO STAFF REPORT, RIO VISTA AREA ANNEXATION
The following update is at the request of the Council and in part
a response to comments that arose during the hearing on the
matter before the Planning and Zoning Commission.
I. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The City's Comprehensive Plan, adopted in August 1976,
addresses broad land uses. This general vicinity is identified
as Area II, Site B and the Plan states:
"Topographic variations, close proximity to Payette River,
the presence of a country road, and the sewage treatment
plan south of the site, all contribute to a high rating for
residential land use."
Under the final section called "Public and Private Actions" the
plan notes that the City of McCall should:
"consider annexation of additional lands as development
pressure grows in areas adjacent to the City and thus assure
their development in accordance with the General Plan."
The Plan is uncertain in terms of detail of which areas to be
annexed. A broad application of this direction is expected as
conditions and circumstances warrant, based upon your judgement
and discretion.
II. TAX IMPACTS:
The City Treasurer has provided the attached comparison for
outlining the tax impacts upon various types of properties as
requested by the Council on August 12.
III. ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENCE:
Attached is correspondence which has been received to date
in addition to the testimony in the file submitted for the
Planning and Zoning Commission's hearing.
Bud
City of McCall
Changes in Property Tax Obligations
Brought about by Annexation.
Property < A >< B ><
Before After
$35,000 $35,000
MV-Land
MV-Improvements
Total Market Value
Adjusted Market Value
District Rate
Valley County
MD School Dist
McCall Mem. Hosp.
Rural Fire Dist
(Improvements Only)
Cemetary
Sewer District
City of McCall
Total
Percent Change
0.003030
0.003980
0.000800
0.001352
0.000030
0.000421
0.004933
0.014546
$35,000 $35,000
$35,000 $35,000
$106.05
$139.30
$28.00
$0.00
$1.05
$14.74
$289.14
$106.05
$139.30
$28.00
$0.00
$1.05
$14.74
$172.66
$461.79
59.71%
Before
$35,000
$55,000
$90,000
$62,500
$189.38
$248.75
$50.00
$37.18
$1.88
$26.31
$553.49
After
$35,000
$55,000
$90,000
$62,500
.PROPERTY A is an unimproved lot with an assessed market value of $35,000
PROPERTY-B is a lot valued at $35.000 with improvements (Home)
valued at $55.000 in the Sewer District and with a Homeowners'
exemption.
PROPERTY C is a lot valued at $45.000 with improvements (Home)
valued at $90,000, not in the Sewer District and no Homeowners'
exemption.
PROPERTY D is a lot valued at $55,000 with improvements (Home)
valued at $135.000. in the Sewer District and with a Homeowner's
exemption.
$189.38
$248.75
$50.00
$0.00
$1.88
$26.31
$308.31
$824.63
48.99%
Before
$45.000
$90,000
$135,000
$135,000
C >< D >
$409.05
$537.30
$108.00
$121.68
$4.05
$1.180.08
After
$45,000
$90.000
$135,000
$135,000
$409.05
$537.30
$108.00
$4.05
$665.96
$1,724.36
46.12%
Before
$55,000
$150,000
$205,000
$130,000
$393.90
$517.40
$104.00
After
$55,000
$150,000
$205,000
$130,000
$393.90
$517.40
$104.00
$202.80
$3.90 $3.90
$54.73 $54.73
$641.29
$1,276.73 $1,715.22
34.34%
-71-ei /vf' .
14;9 417\ 7'"‘
-TM'ci)i,
A2*" ,v-
'/47SIWCW4V-e/ vr
-114 1711H(T% )e-1,&-` ra j V �'r' �/21274
-)nrif..441turyli,
41g, r
1, • 2y,
9-ww,97-suw ;r/Yviliio af"27/c iqxs
7 /'�,- tOr)/,�/{' 1 ;e1 Pr'41/ 44'14 rwv
Y-7111./ rz719 7-111/.
/`) e.
v L1
r,, ' 7 i � � -uy 1.2
11
rn
1;2;,V
err
_590/p ky d
zWzb J=gym,
A 7:
Ken Busby
Rim Vista Propwrty Owner
August 31, 1993
Mayor and Council
city of McCall
P. O. Box 1065
McCalIr Idaho 8Z638
Dear Mayor and Council:
1 am in favor of the annexation of the Rio Vista Subdivisions. I
have owned an undevoloped lot No. 38, in Rio Subdivision No. l
Thi lot �� typical of many other undeveloped lot�
«�incex 19�S�. s
along the river on thvv culdeaac streets of Chula St— Cammyctic�l
and �co��m��
Drive and Memo Uncle which cannot be developed in a Practical
the
" economical manner without the benefit of wervi��s which annexation can bring about,
I bm,1ivvve the community residents in Rio Vistj subdivision that
have *�xpre��ed rejection of the annexation are nut keeping a long
f the munity in mind with this appruach.
The
term view o � �om t value to nut
natural quality ��f the McCall area is to qreaa v � Services
-
which the bnonnfits of the avkilable infrastructure an
which are appropreate for a growing community.
Ypur Open Letter to the Citizens of McCall Published innth*�L8tar-
News on August 26, is all about water quality improvemeVista
zst that
u�� �� dpmr* The most signif1cant problem in the Rio 1s � d
m ^ i �f ,*�t�� quality. With aging an
����d�vis��ns is also a� issue . t t
- i the area, wat�r quality will no ��
inadequate septic systems n e " The
better without appropriate sewer �nd wat�r ��rvi �es.
Annoxation will provide benefits for all present and future
id � i both the near term and the long term, Any increase
re� �n � n f the n�*xat�i�n will be a bargain
1n property taxes a� � result o �* an lit
and a small Prime to P�y for the many benefits and quay
improvementw in roads and services.
I 1883 % granted � sewer easement on my propcerty to thQ Payette
n � S District. In 1990, corrm�spondmnce with R.
Lakes Water an Sewer ^ �onfirm�d their desire to retain
Ted Whiteman, District Man�ger� H also indicated that
the easement for future �c�nsideration. �
the City of McC�all is responsib1e for operation and maintenance
of the existing sewer system in Rio Vtstav and they would be the
logical choice to serve the rest of Rio Vista.
�f
The Rio Vista Subdivisions arm definitely part of the City
McCall. please complete the Pass" thr`�
annexation"
Thapk ygp for your consideratiun,
AIJAc RMOT5
��c r r r i
7 J % - . L I " . J I n i i
" P a y e t t e L a k e s W a t e r . a n d
" ' S e w e r D i s t r i c t
P . Q . B o x 1 5 6 6 .
M c C a l l , I d a h o 8 3 6 3 8
N o v e m b e r 2 2 , 1 9 8 3
. " D e a r P r o p e x " t y , O w A e z : '
E n c l o s e d " . a r e . , t w o . c o p i e s o f y o u r . e a s e m e n t p r e p a r e d b y " t h e D 3 ��s t r i o t .
" f o r y o u r . ' e o n a i , d e x a . t i o n " . ' .
- A ' y o u " . m a y h a v e ' h e a r d ' ; t h e P a y e t t e L a k e s W a t e r a n d S e w e r D i s t r i c t
. h a s " r e c e i v e d ' . a p p z n x i m a a t e 1 y $ 4 . 4 m i l l i o n t o c o m p l e t e c o n s t r u c t i o n
! . o f f ' ' a l ] , ; t h e ' s e w e r ' l i n e s ; w i t h i n t h e D i s t r i c t .
r
" . , F o x t h i s r e a s o n , . w e m u s t
. e a s e m e n t w i t h i n ' . 7 . d a y s .
w i l l . h e l p . t h i s p r o j e c t g
T h i s " g r a n t . i s . f r o m t h e F a r m e r H o i n e A d m i n i s t r a t i o n a n d ` i s a d i r e c t
_ " " . ' r e s u l t . o f t h e " J o b s B i l l " a p p r o v e d b y C o n g r e s s e a r l i e r t h i s y e a r .
. p a r t . o f t h e ' C o n g x e s s i o n a l m a n d a t e w h i c h a c c o m p a n i e s t h i s g r a n t i s
. . ' - t h a t t h e S e w e r D i s t r i c t m u s t i m m e d i a t e l y i . Y a p a . e m e n t t h i s ' s e w e r p r o j e c t
' o r l o d e ' . t h e f u n d s . ' " "
c e i v e a s i g n e d c o p y o f t h e e n c l o s e d
r e
Y o u r i m m e d i a t e c o n s i d e r a t i o n , o f t h i s o f f e r
o f o r w a x d . o n s c h e d u l e .
. . Y o u . w i . f l b e ' c o n t a c t e d b y ' a n a g e n t o f t h e S e w e r D i s t r a c t i n a f e w
. : d a y s ' w h o , w i l l b e p r e p a r e d t o a n s w e r a n y q u e s t i o n s y o u m a y h a v e , o r
" y o u . m a y . c o n t a c t t h e S e w e r D i s t r i c t O f f i c e a t " 2 0 8 - 6 3 4 - ��2 8 9 6 ' .
T o . a c c e p t t h i s o f f e r a n d g r a n t " t h e ' e a s e m e n t . , a l l p a r t i e s n a m e d i n
; t h e , : e a s e m e n t w h o h o l d " a n ' ��i n t e r e s t i n t h e p r o p e r t y n e s t . s i g n a n d
h a v e . t h e i r s i g n a t u r e s n o t a r i z e d .
P l e a s e r e t u r n y o u r ' s i g n e d a n d n o t a r i z e d e a s e m e n t t o R i c k M a l l o r y ,
P a y e t t e L a k e s W a t e r a n d ' S e w e r . D i s t r a . C t , P . O . B o x 1 , 5 6 6 , M c C a l l , I D
8 3 6 3 8 .
W e d o a p p r e c i a t e y o u r e a r l y c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h i s e a s e m e n t .
" " Y o u r s v - t r u l y ,
i . c k M a l 1 0 " , C o o r d " a t o r
P a y e t t e L " ' e s W a t e a n d S e w e r D i s t r i c t "
R M : a p
"
5ti ul 7.3 ✓Jo • J f.111"I n��.vn ��� u a. v
Payette Lakes Water and
Sewer District
P.O. Box 1566
McCall, Idaho, 83638
(208) 634.4111
May 31, 1990
Kenneth B. Busby
927 Van Nuys St.
San Diego, 0A 92109
Dear Mr. Busby:
The question which you asked concerning the District's easement along
your property was referred to the District's attorneys and to the
District Board of Directors at the regular meeting of May 4, 1990.
The legal staff advised the Board, after researching the statutes, that
the easement which you granted to the District is still valid and would
continue to be valid unless the Board chose to convey or nullify the
easement in some manner. The Board generally felt that it would be pru-
dent to retain the easement for future consideration of construction if
indeed that ever materializes.
The Board also felt, however, that if the affected property owner wishes
to justify the need for easement nullification, they would consider each
request on a case by case basis. With that in mind the District Board
directed me to ask you to further explain your request for easement
nullification. Please indicate in your request, (1) What your specific
plans are and how they are directly impacted by the existence of the
easement. (2) Please show with a map how the easement will interfere
with your building plans - also consider zoning set backs. I have been
informed by the Impact Planning & Zoning Commission Chairperson that a
setback of 50' from the North Pork of the Payette River is the rule for
river and lakefront lots. It is my understanding that the sewer easement
falls well within this dimension and may moot the issue of interference.
To update you onthe background, I researched the Rio Vista issue and
recorded the following chronology: After a class action lawsuit Bled
by some residents in Rio Vista Subdivision, a decision was rendered by
a District Judge which in effect stated that the Payette Lakes Water and
Sewer District improperly included Rio Vista Subdivision within its
boundaries and. consequently had no authority to tax these properties for
Bond Indebtedness. The PLWSD Board with concurrence of the State Tax
Commission then applied this decisionto all properties within the Rio
Vista Subdivision and on 4/13/84 voted to deannex Rio Vista Subdivision.
The end result is that the Payette Lakes Water and Sewer District does
not have taxing authority in the Subdivision and consequently did not
expend funds to construct a sewer system in an area outside its boundaries.
The Rio Vista Subdivision was then removed from service consideration by
the Sewer District.
Payette Lakes Water and
Sewer District
P.O. Box 1566
McCall, Idaho 83638
(208) 634.4111
Recently it has been learned that either developmental pressures or
regulatory directives may again focus on achieving.. central sewer service
for those unserved areas of Rio Vista. Since the Cite of McCall
responsible for operation and maintenance of the existing sewer system
in RioiVista, it seems to fae %hat ey wot,7.a be the logical choice oz"
munici-oalities to serve „le res' o xo ista. Y o not know what the
city s position is regarding this issue. If you desire further infor-
mation or wish to follow through with your request, please contact our
office.
Sincerely,
R. Ted Whiteman
District Manager
RTW/jf
cc file (Rio Vista)
0,4
c43(a_petvote-54-
cpe_
cca Ocrtia
z1/4 k*.C4(e.Ai o) gzo 0j2k. 1oiaDs„ taA.
ammeudt) EL_ (o jtL(Cca. TA- ofiaza.44, )09„)t±04
-
0AftocaturZA. CD CL AAAAALL COai. itatdt, 'JCL beA44
•gaCO.A- AJLOLed esp411,444.
_A.04:40-64A^41
ADOd
12A.01,,,A.2.0
UR. .11) oJj o1 d3 ffL 15s/..4.0tL
Amin Smag. AA% Ou'sc,ilto t€13 /f4e4444, fe0,4_
— UXLJ k0.4. AL,‘,..04kA 0$i dk
712( Li3)
exo_po7e4)
1.s5ot_
otA.N. AAci
'Lai kat. Rio Oi-sia. cu.A.0._ mica) e.txt&470214/ kLit_cott.
c6 k(1,4 Ott " U.)04.0542- cifb2.c.11,4t34--
tPkilc;-Q Cotkaizt
T-f- Ike4e_ 40PA4D kat Rco
enkat5 IGA,4aauto lotlAkci Mecall19J •IcOv4 ;0
it)0t4e1/4. kezze. AL.Q
QtAult oct—L it) fAtAt.
okkcA__AAAAcir‘feteJgx) cug.00 )43.4.t1fz. TA, fro„.4-1
" crA04_6•01DAL.n )ACCea
ckAAAct.tev:tifie To-&4z_) aAJ Amatc)
6e_ ctAkitkvr-ecS ct.Q.a.c (
k(LeL32 4JsLc. 4ho ci fa,
aLcrk,301 kQ t CZ c„ .OE
Ma -'et ilA,\41)u2.4,aD
aaciAA.c. 3
•••IL
A.Q.L.e,L4.14,2
0-"tc its•nu-Lo
6v14 g.54a1/4
-77
GU& ka‘.0. tie,AArtto AAelN t.Z1
ll•Q — A.AW76 paxICS 11"
Za
Au
ioU& a
o- tat)
ciateAk:cs_-_PrA
isto..A. LI -
ri:_tusS4 a_J 0.0.1
IN24, 1.4t. oi-eAA-A o.
;AA. kaaJ AdftritteAt5t7AaktrL
iLft,toWs ko_cov.,4%Gu.c)0L., A;cAectowe±Q pLc 4rus2_
ebiQuid+L.:,... iztool-s4k 5
•
mu
ALtig fAvvicl2 At;tiL 46 cexac$
,4efL644_4-s/ QtLa- 01A*0 *4444eD 'AD La.40-
(iit&45 56eoice-
TS5AA.12_5 - F; T.551.,44
T Des._ 5.444u) CV> a-
5i-X—ra—rak.5
11-e. AAA.0.0:44
CO 1-5\lk CLIJAz%- i•D eJCJIMO4A-4 • _e+
9tAsua:f h9-4
. N
CLIAArct..12
AADA;A\-Et,;.. t9,4- kwa cbtrurC4c.
LCD iv:A
LL D A;;vt,14,4
__Amp+ NLQ.12-_____Cka
.
vuttl.NcoLL ._ A.A
;AA ►ices
41) ovA4,0_,A-tane .04.A u . (?)
G
04,a -6, .tursuld
k
CLAA.c
--
10
ef) C et M caliE--, -- C
oift co. , .
fi T
11)
,tutlx.L4e,
321&ee
AA% � art nisefe443 0414. Wit .
tfh Neill Con wig. 1h'L C%r�
.\1•1-5 lovuxcisries 14 nutms ito 543t, -ID •24,149c
'0 Ili 1-A. ! De 044,4.1 Mtn. 04,44 ,
-11415 -b --)a ft. o4' 1 , J 'V L & resrot s.
GISELE VAN BARK
13100 WEDDINGTON STREET
VAN NUYS, CA. 91401
August 4, 1993
..City Planning_ &_Zoning Commission
McCall, ID. 83638
Dear Planning & Zoning Commission,
As a property owner in Valley View Subdivision, I am strongly opposed to annexation
of that area by the City of McCall. I agree with the recommendation by Bud Schmidt,
City Administrator regarding Valley View in his Annexation Report dated June 16,
1993.
Valley View does not receive city water service, central sanitary service, street
maintenance, Police or Fire service. Annexation of this area would substantially
increase our taxes without giving us anything of value in return. We are currently
on individual wells and septic systems and do not desire those systems replaced by
city services . We are not anxious to trade existing services that work well (i.e.
Sheriff and McCall Rural Fire District) for city services that are "impaired" (see
Annexation Report, Area III Valley View Area, E & F) . I feel that the proposal to
annex Valley View places an unfair burden on the property owners and residents of
the area.
Sincerely,
'-(A\r)
Gisele van Bark
GVB/dv
McCALL PLANNING & ZONING
EXHIBIT!
RECEIVED
k\..,\LAA,v,,D\ 6
MEMORANDUM
July 30, 1993
TO:
FROM:
CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
STAN & WARNA SEARS
300 Rio Vista Blvd., McCall
RE: Annexation of Rio Vista
Dear. Commission Members:
We were disappointed that there was no time for discussion of the
proposed annexation at your last meeting. Because we are scheduled
to be out of town during the special meeting upcoming we herewith
submit our written comments for your consideration.
In reviewing the City Administrator's "Rio Vista Annexation Report"
presented at the last Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, we
felt it lacked essential information needed to determine the
proposal's worth to the residents of Rio Vista. By speaking with
city and county employees and others, we have attempted to
extrapolate the missing information.
The following is submitted for open review by P&Z as well as fellow
residents of the Rio Vista area.
(Page `t- ot� Fi
Elf bT ict
RECEIVED
ESTIMATED COST OF ANNEXATION TO RIO VISTA RESIDENTS
INCREASED PROPERTY TAX FROM ANNEXATION:
Net Assessed MarketValue
Approximated additional taxes to City, annual
Estimated revenues from shared revenues
based on population (annual):
(Shared disbursement from sales tax)
$12,011,627
$91,000
$27,338
Annual income'to the city at last year's
millage rate of .53/100 $63,662
Estimated number of families in Rio Vista: 100
Estimated annual increase in property taxes: $637
(per household)
ADDITIONAL COST OF ANNEXATION:
Annual cost of City.' -.imposed LID to correct
"substandard" streets, sewer and water lines (est.) $931*,
TOTAL OF ANNUAL PROP. TAX INCREASE & LID COST ESTIMATES: $1.568
We understand that the burden on individual households to pay for LID
improvements will be determined by frontage. These figures are presented in an
effort to quantify the total costs to Rio Vista residents. IT SHOULD BE NOTED,
THOUGH, THAT THE FIGURES INDICATE AN AVERAGE INCREASE OF APPROXIMATELY 300% OVER
CURRENT PROPERTY TAX LEVELS.
An LID recently formed by the residents of Lake Fork Subdivision dealt with
surfacing 1.2 miles of gravel road, only 22 feet wide. The total cost of
$50,000 divided between 99 lots averaged $500 per lot in that case.
Rio Vista's roads are over 24 feet --approximately 9% wider --and we
may be faced with changing the grade and/or surfacing 4_5 miles of roads.
We therefore have approximately 375% more roads times the 9% increase in
width, giving us an estimated 409% greater area to improve. It follows
that our cost for upgrading of roads compared to that of Lake Fork may be
estimated at $205,000. This figure, however, will be dwarfed by the cost
of necessary engineers, planning, testing and construction work to upgrade
our sewer and water systems.
The suggestions made to me regarding the total cost of correcting
the substandard water, sewer and roads indicate a price tag approximating
$1,000,000. Divided between the 100 or so residences in Rio Vista and
amortized over 20 years at 7%, the total annual payments average $931 per
household per year.
(Page 2 of 6)
HOW ANNEXATION IS LIKELY TO AFFECT HOMEOWNERS' OBLIGATIONS
John Q has a home with a AMV of $120,000. How might his taxable obligations be
affected by McCall annexation as proposed?
NOW ANNEXED
Property Tax Obligation: $658 $658
(w/ homeowners exemption) (50% AMV x .010969) (50% AMV x .010969)
based on '92 millage
City of McCall Obligation:
based on '92 millage
Local Improvement District:
(imposed for water, sewer,
roads)
TOTAL OBLIGATIONS:
$318
-none- (additional .0053)
-none-
$931
(see approximation above)
(over 20 years)
$658 $1,907
Differential obligation increase = ANNEXED/Now = 2.9
This rough estimation based on the best information available on short notice
indicates that our anticipated obligations from 'city annexation may result,
conservatively, in an increase of 300 percent.
(Page 3 of 6)
COMPARISON OF BENEFIT, BEFORE AND AFTER ANNEXATION
After annexation and the imposition of an LID, the same John Q is now paying
three times the amount of his previous property taxes. How has he benefitted?
**
###
Water service:
NOW ANNEXED
adequate same
Sewage service:. adequate same
Streets: adequate improved#
Police service: adequate may be
improved
Fire service: adequate sane#
Snow removal: good inferior*
Voting privileges: no yes
(on city policy)
Representation at none ## may run for
City Council: : office
The area stands to acquire 2.3 miles of additional blacktop, albeit on
circles, dead -ends and lightly -traveled streets, after as much as two nears
of construction.
Further discussion on page 5
With special permission, one Rio Vista resident serves on P&Z
(Page 4 of 6)
The follow issues need to be addressed prior to annexation:
1. ANTICIPATED LOSS OF WATER PRESSURE FOR CITY
Annexation will mean that McCall's ability to adequately supply the water
needs of the city will be impaired. As we understand the city's staff
report, McCall has been inadequately equipped to supply acceptable water
pumping capacity since 1986. There is a suggestion in the current staff
r.eport on annexation that after improvements are made in the Rio Vista
water system, the city may be incapable of meeting the demands of a fire
emergency during peak periods of a hot summer --a situation affecting aL
residents of McCall. (Curiously, the staff report makes no recommendation
that the city address this potentially life -threatening problem first.)
2. NO APPARENT NEED FOR ADDITIONAL FIRE EQUIPMENT
Since the current fire district is already_obligated to_service Rio Vista,
why would the city be obligated after annexation to "acquire additional
fire apparatus?" Either the fire department is currently adequate or it
is not. Annexation has nothing to do with the department's size and would
not alter the demand. Fire department access to Rio Vista in an emergency
continues to be the only real issue we face'now or in the future.
3. NO ANTICIPATED IMPROVEMENT IN FIRE AND POLICE ACCESS
There currently exists a problem with access for fire and police services.
The recommendations of the staff report suggest aggressive pursuit of
construction of the Deinhard-Boydstun Connector. Review of the proposed
route south of the city in relation to the fire station, the majority of
Rio Vista residents, -the lay of the land, and where the actual connection
into Boydstun will take place suggests that, even with this connector, the
swiftest access to Rio Vista will still be across the Lardo Bridge.
4. ANTICIPATED LOSS OF ADEQUATE SNOW REMOVAL
The county currently runs trucks with plows as well as a grader as many
as six times per day to maintain the streets of Rio Vista. The city's
staff report suggests one additional "truck plow" to meet the demand here.
Many Rio Vista residents hold the opinion that the current county
snowplowing is much superior to that of many residential areas within the
city limits. This is a real concern for many families whose children must
ride school buses inthe winter months. r.
5. ARE WE BEING ASKED TO PAY FOR PAST CODE VIOLATIONS?
It is our understanding that water, sewer and road codes were violated in
the development of Rio Vista. If true, won't the City's demand for
"improvements" amount to asking the homeowners to compensate for violations
that were allowed at the time of development?
6. NO ACCOUNTING
The City has not shown how it will use the majority of new tax revenues
to return real services to our area in exchange for those tax dollars.
7. MINIMAL NEED FOR VOTING PRIVILEGES IN CITY ELECTIONS
The cost of water may be the only thing the City does that concerns us.
As has been shown in the past, it is not legal to assess any group of users
more. than is their proportional obligation, so this issue is of equal
concern to all residents using the McCall water system. (Page 5 of 6)
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
At present, the aforementioned services (water, sewer, roads, and snow -removal)
look to be entirely adequate and in some cases even superior to that found within
much of the McCall city limits.
It appears that annexation of Rio Vista Subdivision would result in approximately
a 50% increase in property taxes to the residents, in addition to forcing
commitments to paying for changes in water, sewer and roads. The cost of such
"improvements" appears to be considerable, dwarfing the increase in property
taxes.
Suppose one of you wants to build a tower. Will he not
first sit down and estimate the cost to see if he has
enough money to complete it?
Luke 14:28
There appears to be no interest by the city at this time to even speculate about
the expense of the imposed LID. We suspect the reason is that someone else
would have to pay for it. Our own limited investigation suggests an increase
in out-of-pocket costs to the property owners approximating 300%, with no
meaningful benefit.
Furthermore, it seems likely that the costs of the Local Improvement District
would have a negative effect on turnover of real estate in the affected area.
(All other factors being equal, why would a homebuyer choose to pay substantial
additional taxes on an otherwise identical property?)
Because of the unreasonable burden it would place upon the residents of Rio
Vista, we oppose annexation until such time as the issues herein are addressed
openly between the city and residents of Rio Vista.
Thank you for your consideration.
Stan Sears
Warna Sears
(Page 6 of 6)
PO BOX 4416
McCall, ID 83638
•
CHAIRMAN
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
CITY HALL
McCall, ID 83638
V, , 3
(--RO-AAAA-u-S
A3 A-OLARa
�o G
i k-i
T-C- d MieL4D
AcAJ_SAA-- 00.k_ Co;•6-611A,
ktcCa02 c ILA_C( p-AL LcLAH- 7/-t( (013 tact
— Z6o
AAccufc:(31— S S X-k^ 14A e511
.CLULIALIts,AQ)3 'COLS w
�lJco CiISL 0‘.20• A ramie 0. ai
eThol ja-e 9-curA oloue4-6),
-6 __Ae arc(.---
c�- 9.nn cx ce 9.Q.eAwo,1
f-. d aDv,opu-,(_
•
Van tij
-1:Qta /(rfl 4fUl:-1 Z> och kaQ
A_ C Q
C� t o ` McCA1 CLAN i
GLf- LI , o )C20-Q-
±Q MaxiCAI_ c)44A___AA&)crSoCA-
t
G S t.2 Cc
49
J e g� _ -
r)blQ,„ A„,-u_Pd
AceTa4c- s5.L.Le)3
°()—?�6ia.Q
e....4 - `. ui `lea ('ivy w`FM. Q� �, -c�,p I I [ ,
1±0,01
t2c.m_ 1
bLo oLtAfrtp,d- —K,0± 100,Q_ siv;
������
spi
(lzkA 1021
PIM" SVC> 4P-62— ° mta-Lr;(Q
A-46QN•eAp ak 10.0__±sca osa;etA
04cA/o; ALEL:5 ofic,cutIL. eQ,Ifro 6J, Acru5e,
\ciRkt&_324-31()_Zu;Alt ;,`` EL0u1-.
l A-2_ IJ 1`�l�-e D per �,�"� �- AZP- X‘-2
II0Am-'?- COS
-azwc2:6au LTD OF/Lea -e..o_cx„._
q-VTrA,- tro-±kp al.xJojcut-ee_it, .16 LO-
\cLA.R/I kL. C(. L_L D, ±ae_
Aitio—\-- Isa_+__or.J 0.Vk ANUCJLectAQ ,,LwAu7ce,5 k
aa)iQz i Flo- L9.)(16.Aw
A fi,u,t.SAcark_ L e
AzA
46-Cm- 101 e fD
go,a 4rA.F___cb Tfye3 43 1-ct- v,e3- 72,kay.
mO 6jA
ta-e L)1.5.j'1/4- i(a.4;i2lnAto c_e_e-k- -L HC- 8,2 sa .__,g;IA,vL-7
_
.M.,,cSLQ CAQ41.
ri
4b 'Lo
pAA3j
0 viie__Acru-) tutirv_ Ginifv_
kAm="' A/10
c
I r! 2 LCe c P ELL
a -A
lM I 1 QL "`I
A- Alick.s
1125
M C \\ c.1o'3C3�
•
to u
1k4CDot rIAAAltbs
MCc Qeer 3c3g
. 1 7+ 1a4� 1]9R
99R
I VE-FK OF FE ,,I_AR d
BRIAN L. McMAHAN
334 Rio Vista Blvd.
P. O. Box 1255
McCall, ID 83638
634-4880 (Home)
634-7641 (Work)
July 20, 1993
HAND -DELIVERED
City of McCall
Attn: Planning and Zoning Commission
Attn: Mayor Smith
Attn: City Council Members
P. O. Box 1065
McCall, ID 83638
Re: Proposed Annexation of Rio Vista Subdivision
Dear Mayor, City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission:
I am writing this letter to formally register my opposition to the proposed annexation
of Rio Vista Subdivision by the City of McCall. While I can appreciate the City's
perceived need for increased tax revenues, I can see no evidence of how annexation will
benefit me or my property. I have seen no commitment on the City's part to improve
services in the area; rather, I am afraid that the proposed annexation simply constitutes
taxation without benefit. The City does not seem to be able to adequately service its
existing citizenry, let alone the expanded commitment that ought to accompany the
proposed annexation. I ask that the proposed annexation not be recommended by the
Planning and Zoning Commission, nor should it be passed by the Mayor and City Council.
BLM/dm
brian
Sincerely,
va),L poix-d-L
BRIAN L. McMAHAN
McCALL PLANNING & ZONING
EXHIBIT /(,,
RECEIVED
Brian L. McMahan
P.O. Box 1255
McCall, ID 83638
,
Fi r 13D_ 13
k•°-
City of McCall
Attn: Planning and Zoning Commission
Attn: Mayor Smith
Attn: City Council Members
Yc.
a oU4 TAX
HOW?
Your home has an Assessed Market Value..
obligations be affected by the MCCaT1
approx State Property Tax:
(w/ homeowners exemption) ',
based on '92 millage
New City of McCall Tax:
based on '92 millage
Local Improvement District:
(imposed for water, sewer,
roads) (LID)
TOTAL OBLIGATIONS:
ti
i ght .your taxable
d?'
.010969) (50% AMV
-none-
-none-
$658
Ok•
(additional.0053)
1.(1`'
969)
$931 *
(see approximation below)
(over 20 nears)
$1.907
Differential obligation = ANNEXED/NoW = 2.9, or a 300% increase ! .
* The LID to correct the 'substandard' rater, serer and roads suggests et least a $1,000,000 project to be
• imposed after annexation. Divided betreen the 100 or so residences of Rio Vista and amortized over 20 years et
1%, the total annual payments average $931 per household per year.
WHAT TO DO...
1.- Get your copy of "The Rio Vista Annexation Report" fran McCall City Hall
and make sure the next P&Z meeting is still on for Wednesday. •
2. Read it, share it with your neighbors, and bring than to the special
Planning -and Zoning meeting to have your,quastions answered and let your
.torments, be known: .
When: Wednesday, 8/4/93 @ 7:3Opm
Where: McCall Library
Your neighbors, Stan & Warne Sears at 300 Rio Vist IV1cC ii-816 41iiuC & LQNING
EXHIBIT �� S
RECEIVED
MARCH 26,1993
TO: Bud Schmidt, City Administrator
FROM: Bill Keating, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Annexation Rio Vista Areas #2 and 43
Bud,
I will attempt to tell you what I know about these two areas. During
this report I will refer back and forth from area #2 and area #3.
Area 42 includes Blue Jay Subdivision. Pine terrace #2 and a portion of
Pine Terrace #1. This includes 9 lots on Coy Road.
/ 5�
Blue Jay sub has 15 lots with 8 homes now in place. 569
Pine Terrace #2 has 36 lots with homes now in place.
There is at present no water lines or sewer lines.to serve the area.
The roads are 70' right of way. Graveled roads presently plowed by Valley
County Road Department. Aprox. 1.91 miles of road of road to maintain by the
city if annexed. According to Jeff Lappin the Blue Jay Subdivision seems to
perc very well. The present dwellings have private wells and septic tanks.
AREA #3
Area 43 includes Pine Terrace #1 less the 9 lots in Area #2. All of
Valley View Subdivision. There are again no water or sewer lines serving
this area. The Valley County Road Department plows and maintaines the 70'
right of way streets. Aprox. 2.10 miles of road to maintain and plow if
annexed.
Jeff Lappin reported to me that as you go south from Blue Jay
Subdivision, as mush as 30% of the lots he has tested won't perc.
Some of the existing homes have expensive above ground drain fields. He also
told me that Larry Barnes is building a land application treatment plant in
the area of Payette River Subdivision. Mr. Barnes may be interested in
working with the City in the future building a possible trunk line.
At this time the only effect this possible annexation will have on my
staff is the plowing and maintenance of aprox 4 more miles of road. This
breaks down to about 1/2 a snow plow route.
If I can do any more to help you please let me know.
Thank You;
MCCALL PLANNING & ZONING
EXHIBIT
RECEIVED
C:\MYDATA\STREETS.WPFI F10===0
West Valley Road 1337' gravel
Wisdom Road 1301' gravel
Blue Jay Drive 955' gravel
Chad Dr from Wisdom 5451' gravel
Coy Rd 2685' gravel
Pine Terrace Dr 1536' gravel
Valley View Lane 2100' gravel
Ridge Rd 2904' gravel -
Chris Lane 555' gravel
Valley Rim Rd 3335' gravel
REF/B C 0.90 DRAFT Num L00143C01
1Y1 E IYl V £ t] 1V L V 1.1
1 3
DATE: March 26, 1993
TO: City Administ tor Schmidt
FROM: City Tr r Henderson
RE: Annexation Report
PART I - RIO VISTA AREA
1. According to the Valley County Assessor's reports, the
Rio Vista area is approximately 46% developed and carries a
market value (net of homeowner's exemptions) of $12,011,627.
2. Using the same average persons per household in the 1990
census, annexation would increase the population of the City by
about 365.
3. Estimated increases in revenues would be as follows:
City/County Revenue Sharing $ 24,900
Property Tax @ current rate $ 66.000
Total $ 90,900
PART II - BLUE JAY AREA
1. The Blue Jay Area consisting of Blue Jay Subdivision and
Pine Terrance #1 & #2 is approximately 18% developed and carries
a market value (net of homeowner's exemptions) of $662,999.
2. Annexation would increase the population of the City by
about 20.
3. Estimate increases in revenues would be as follows:
City/County Revenue Sharing $ 630
Property Tax @ current rate $ 3.645
Total $ 4,275
PART III - VALLEY VIEW AREA
1. The Valley View Area is approximately 22% developed and
carries a market value (net of homeowner's exemptions) of
$3,011,454.
2. Annexation would increase the population of the City by
about 30. McCALL PLANNING & ZONING
EXHIBIT (.5
RECEIVED
3. Estimated increases in revenues would be as follows:
$ 2,000
$1
$18,600
City/County Revenue Sharing
Property Tax @ current rate
Total
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
On JULY 20, 1993, at 7:00 P. M. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the
Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of McCall will hold A PUBLIC HEARING at
216 E. Park Street, McCall, Idaho (that is, at City Hall, in the American Legion meeting
room) TO CONSIDER THE APPROPRIATE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION OF
VARIOUS PROPERTIES IN THE AREAS included in, the areas surrounding, and the areas
surrounded by RIO VISTA, PINE TERRACE, and VALLEY VIEW, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT "A", IN CONNECTION WITH the
possibility of the ANNEXATION of some or all of these areas.
Dated: June 28, 1993
Sue Davidson,
Planning & Zoning Clerk
Exhibit "A"
THE LANDS WHICH MAY BE ANNEXED CONSIST OF ONE OR MORE OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED AREAS, OR ANY COMBINATION THEREOF, OR ANY
COMBINATION OF PARTS THEREOF:
AREA ONE
Commencing at a 5/8" rebar marking the S 1/16 Corner common to Sections 7
and 8, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., a point on the existing City Limits of the City
of McCall, Valley County, Idaho, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING:
Thence, N. 89° 44' 19" W., 415.60 feet along the northerly boundary of the SE
1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said Section 7 and such City Limits,
thence, S. 0° 13' 05" W., 1322.49 feet to the line common to Sections 7 and
18, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., City of McCall, Valley County, Idaho,
thence, N. 89° 56' 10" E., 718.11 feet to the Section Corner common to said
Sections 7, 8, 17 and 18,
thence, south, along the westerly right-of-way of Boydstun Street to its
intersection with the northerly right-of-way of West Valley Road,
thence, S. 0° 02' 46" E., 35 feet to the northwest corner of Mccall Industrial
Park, as shown on the official plat thereof on file in the office of the Recorder
of Valley County, Idaho, in Book 8, on Page 11 of Plats,
thence, S. 0° 02' 46" E., 662.01 feet to the southwest corner of said McCall
Industrial Park,
thence, N. 89° 56' 10" E., 718.11 feet to the southeast corner of said McCall
Industrial Park,
thence, S. 0° 10' 00" W., 993.45 feet to the C-N-NW-SW 1/256 corner of said
Section 17,
thence, S. 89° 05' 52" E., 1337.13 feet to the C-N-NE-SW 1/256 core eEkksa d�, 81116
Section 17,
EXHIBIT IZ_
RECEIVED
thence, N. 0° 10' 42" E., 330.99 feet to the C-E-W 1/64 corner of said Section
17,
thence, S. 89° 52' 18" E., 668.60 feet to a brass cap marking the Center 1/4
Corner of said Section 17,
thence, continuing S. 89° 52' 18" E., 850 feet, more or less, along the east -west
center section line of said Section 17, to its intersection with the left bank of
the North Fork of the Payette River, a point on the existing City Limits of the
City of McCall,
thence, northerly and westerly along such City Limits and said left bank to its
intersection with the extended north boundary of Government Lot 10, Section
8,
thence, N. 89° 57' 30" W., 1,700 feet, more or less, along said north boundary
and such City Limits to the Point of Beginning.
AREA TWO
Commencing at the northwest corner of Mccall Industrial Park, as shown on
the official plat thereof on file in the office of the Recorder of Valley County,
Idaho, in Book 8, on Page 11 of Plats; thence, N. 0° 02' 46" W., 35 feet to the
northerly right-of-way of West Valley Road, the REAL POINT OF
BEGINNING:
Thence, S. 89° 59' 00" W., 1360 feet, more or less, along said northerly right-of-way to
the westerly right-of-way of Wisdom Road,
thence, S. 0° 01' 59" W., 1395 feet, more or less, along said westerly right-of-
way extended to the southerly right-of-way of West Valley Road,
thence, S. 89° 52' 39" E., 35 feet, more or less to the northwest corner of
Amended Pine Terrace Addition No. 1, as shown on the official plat thereof on
file in the office of the Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, in Book 7, on Page
54 of Plats,
thence, S. 0° 20' 44" E., 1,750.03 feet to the southwest corner of Lot 8, said
Amended Pine Terrace Addition No. 1,
thence, East, 668.12 feet to the southeast corner of said Lot 8, on the westerly
right-of-way of Coy Road,
thence, S. 19° 52' 20" E., 183.85 feet along said westerly right-of-way to its
intersection with the centerline of Williams Creek,
thence, easterly, along said creek center line to the center line of the North Fork
of the Payette River,
thence, southerly to the high water mark on the left bank of said North Fork of
the Payette River,
thence, easterly and northerly along the high water mark of said left bank to its
intersection with a line parallel to and 520 feet south of the line common to
Sections 17 and 20, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., Valley County, Idaho,
thence, easterly to the southwest corner of the existing City Limits,
thence, N. 0° 42' 00" W., 520.00 feet along the existing City Limits to the line
common to said Sections 17 and 20,
thence, West along said common line to its intersection with the high water
mark on the left bank of the North Fork of the Payette River,
thence, northerly along said high water mark to its intersection with the east
boundary of Government Lot 6, said Section 17,
thence, north, 1360 feet, more or less, along said east boundary to the CE 1/16
Corner of said Section 17,
thence, N. 89° 52' 18" W., 1320 feet, more or less, to a brass cap marking the
Center 7t Corner of said Section 17,
thence, N. 89° 52' 18" W., 668.60 feet to the C-E-W 1/64 corner of said Section
17,
thence, S. 0° 10' 42" W., 330.99 feet to the C-N-NE-SW 1/256 corner of said
Section 17,
thence, N. 89° 05' 52" W., 1337.13 feet to the C-N-NW-SW 1/256 corner of
said Section 17,
thence, N. 0° 10' 00" E., 993.45 feet to the southeast corner of said McCall
Industrial Park,
thence, S. 89° 56' 10" W., 718.11 feet to the southwest corner of said McCall
Industrial Park,
thence, N. 0° 02' 46" W., 697.01 feet to the Point of Beginning.
AREA THREE
Commencing at a brass cap marking the E 1/16 Corner common to Sections 18
and 19, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., Valley County, Idaho, being the northwest
corner of Valley View Subdivision No. 3, as shown on the official plat thereof
on file in the Office of the Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, in Book 7 , on
Page 28 of Plats, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING:
thence, along the boundary of said Valley View Subdivision No. 3,
S. 0° 49' 52" W., 2546.61 feet; S. 44° 28' 57" E., 70.32 feet; S. 89° 47' 45" E.,
607.03 feet to the southeast corner of said Valley View Subdivision No. 3,
thence, along the boundary of Valley View Subdivision No. 2, as shown on the
official plat thereof on file in the Office of the Recorder of Valley County,
Idaho, in Book 7, on Page 8 of Plats,
continuing S. 89° 47' 45" E., 290.00 feet; N. 15° 33' 16" E., 91.13 feet; N. 40°
39' 22" E., 231.10 feet; N. 21° 11' 39" E., 262.77 feet; N. 34° 30' 59" E., 392.19
feet; N. 82° 26' 03" E., 250.73 feet; N. 80° 05' 32" E., 306.62 feet; N. 74° 06'
31" E., 306.88 feet to the southeast comer of said Valley View Subdivision No.
2,
thence, S. 79° 27' 13" E., 1396.08 feet along the southerly boundary of Valley
View Subdivision No. 1, as shown on the official plat thereof on file in the
Office of the Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, in Book 6, on Page 14 of
Plats, to the right bank of the North Fork of the Payette River,
thence, perpendicular to said right bank, southeasterly to the high water mark
on the left bank of said Payette River,
thence, northerly along said high water mark to a point perpendicular to the
mouth of Williams Creek,
thence, westerly, along the center line of Williams Creek to its intersection
with the westerly right-of-way of Coy Road,
thence, N. 19° 52' 20" W., 183.85 feet along said right-of-way to the southeast
corner of Lot 8, Amended Pine Terrace Subdivision No. 1, as shown on the
official plat thereof on file in the Office of the Recorder of Valley County,
Idaho, in Book 7 , on Page 54 of Plats,
thence, West, 668.12 feet to the southwest corner of said Lot 8,
thence, S. 0° 20' 44" E., 831.90 feet to the Point of Beginning.
6
k
viEsytteTicail,
-rn+k
clecrtf-
"HIM)
I n
here
•-•• — —
001
.11:11.111,(
11111011 '111::!!!!
NOT TO SCALE
INTERCEP"
f•S
/A:A/0171
/16/64///fill-
Owcfr? e-P
N. •
Or onellJ
1.1
MON ,
Ziff prC.Serr[ 0;44
11111. A Ma k
Arca 4` Z
rea 3
Is 4=5'
rY1 I
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
On JULY 20, 1993, at 7:00 P. M. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the
Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of McCa11 will hold A PUBLIC HEARING at
216 E. Park Street, McCall, Idaho (that is, at City Hall, in the American Legion meeting
room) TO CONSIDER THE APPROPRIATE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION OF
VARIOUS PROPERTIES IN THE AREAS included in, the areas surrounding, and the areas
surrounded by RIO VISTA, PINE TERRACE, and VALLEY VIEW, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT "A", IN CONNECTION WITH the
possibility of the ANNEXATION of some or all of these areas.
Dated: June 28, 1993
Planning & Zoning Clerk
Exhibit "A"
THE LANDS WHICH MAY BE ANNEXED CONSIST OF ONE OR MORE OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED AREAS, OR ANY COMBINATION THEREOF, OR ANY
COMBINATION OF PARTS THEREOF:
AREA ONE
Commencing at a 5/8" rebar marking the S 1/16 Corner common to Sections 7
and 8, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., a point on the existing City Limits of the City
of McCall, Valley County, Idaho, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING:
Thence, N. 89° 44' 19" W., 415.60 feet along the northerly boundary of the SE
1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said Section 7 and such City Limits,
thence, S. 0° 13' 05" W., 1322.49 feet to the line common to Sections 7 and
18, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., City of McCa11, Valley County, Idaho,
thence, N. 89° 56' 10" E., 718.11 feet to the Section Corner common to said
Sections 7, 8, 17 and 18,
thence, south, along the westerly right-of-way of Boydstun Street to its
intersection with the northerly right-of-way of West Valley Road,
thence, S. 0° 02' 46" E., 35 feet to the northwest corner of Mccall Industrial
Park, as shown on the official plat thereof on file in the office of the Recorder
of Valley County, Idaho, in Book 8, on Page 11 of Plats,
thence, S. 0° 02' 46" E., 662.01 feet to the southwest corner of said McCa11
Industrial Park,
thence, N. 89° 56' 10" E., 718.11 feet to the southeast corner of said McCall
Industrial Park,
thence, S. 0° 10' 00" W., 993.45 feet to the C-N-NW-SW 1/256 corner of said
Section 17,
thence, S. 89° 05' 52" E., 1337.13 feet to the C-N-NE-SW 1/256 corner of said
Section 17,
thence, N. 0° 10' 42" E., 330.99 feet to the C-E-W 1/64 corner of said Section
17,
thence, S. 89° 52' 18" E., 668.60 feet to a brass cap marking the Center 1/4
Corner of said Section 17,
thence, continuing S. 89° 52' 18" E., 850 feet, more or less, along the east -west
center section line of said Section 17, to its intersection with the left bank of
the North Fork of the Payette River, a point on the existing City Limits of the
City of McCall,
thence, northerly and westerly along such City Limits and said left bank to its
intersection with the extended north boundary of Government Lot 10, Section
8,
thence, N. 89° 57' 30" W., 1,700 feet, more or less, along said north boundary
and such City Limits to the Point of Beginning.
AREA TWO
Commencing at the northwest corner of Mccall Industrial Park, as shown on
the official plat thereof on file in the office of the Recorder of Valley County,
Idaho, in Book 8, on Page 11 of Plats; thence, N. 0° 02' 46" W., 35 feet to the
northerly right-of-way of West Valley Road, the REAL POINT OF
BEGINNING:
Thence, S. 89° 59' 00" W., 1360 feet, more or less, along said northerly right-of-way to
the westerly right-of-way of Wisdom Road,
thence, S. 0° 01' 59" W., 1395 feet, more or less, along said westerly right-of-
way extended to the southerly right-of-way of West Valley Road,
thence, S. 89° 52' 39" E., 35 feet, more or less to the northwest corner of
Amended Pine Terrace Addition No. 1, as shown on the official plat thereof on
file in the office of the Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, in Book 7, on Page
54 of Plats,
thence, S. 0° 20' 44" E., 1,750.03 feet to the southwest corner of Lot 8, said
Amended Pine Terrace Addition No. 1,
thence, East, 668.12 feet to the southeast corner of said Lot 8, on the westerly
right-of-way of Coy Road,
thence, S. 19° 52' 20" E., 183.85 feet along said westerly right-of-way to its
intersection with the centerline of Williams Creek,
thence, easterly, along said creek center line to the center line of the North Fork
of the Payette River,
thence, southerly to the high water mark on the left bank of said North Fork of
the Payette River,
thence, easterly and northerly along the high water mark of said left bank to its
intersection with a line parallel to and 520 feet south of the line common to
Sections 17 and 20, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., Valley County, Idaho,
thence, easterly to the southwest corner of the existing City Limits,
thence, N. 0° 42' 00" W., 520.00 feet along the existing City Limits to the line
common to said Sections 17 and 20,
thence, West along said common line to its intersection with the high water
mark on the left bank of the North Fork of the Payette River,
thence, northerly along said high water mark to its intersection with the east
boundary of Government Lot 6, said Section 17,
thence, north, 1360 feet, more or less, along said east boundary to the CE 1/16
Corner of said Section 17,
thence, N. 89° 52' 18" W., 1320 feet, more or less, to a brass cap marking the
Center 7C Corner of said Section 17,
thence, N. 89° 52' 18" W., 668.60 feet to the C-E-W 1/64 corner of said Section
17,
thence, S. 0° 10' 42" W., 330.99 feet to the C-N-NE-SW 1/256 corner of said
Section 17,
thence, N. 89° 05' 52" W., 1337.13 feet to the C-N-NW-SW 1/256 corner of
said Section 17,
thence, N. 0° 10' 00" E., 993.45 feet to the southeast corner of said McCa11
Industrial Park,
thence, S. 89° 56' 10" W., 718.11 feet to the southwest corner of said McCall
Industrial Park,
thence, N. 0° 02' 46" W., 697.01 feet to the Point of Beginning.
AREA THREE
Commencing at a brass cap marking the E 1/16 Corner common to Sections 18
and 19, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., Valley County, Idaho, being the northwest
corner of Valley View Subdivision No. 3, as shown on the official plat thereof
on file in the Office of the Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, in Book 7 , on
Page 28 of Plats, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING:
thence, along the boundary of said Valley View Subdivision No. 3,
S. 0° 49' 52" W., 2546.61 feet; S. 44° 28' 57" E., 70.32 feet; S. 89° 47' 45" E.,
607.03 feet to the southeast corner of said Valley View Subdivision No. 3,
thence, along the boundary of Valley View Subdivision No. 2, as shown on the
official plat thereof on file in the Office of the Recorder of Valley County,
Idaho, in Book 7, on Page 8 of Plats,
continuing S. 89° 47' 45" E., 290.00 feet; N. 15° 33' 16" E., 91.13 feet; N. 40°
39' 22" E., 231.10 feet; N. 21° 11' 39" E., 262.77 feet; N. 34° 30' 59" E., 392.19
feet; N. 82° 26' 03" E., 250.73 feet; N. 80° 05' 32" E., 306.62 feet; N. 74° 06'
31" E., 306.88 feet to the southeast comer of said Valley View Subdivision No.
2,
thence, S. 79° 27' 13" E., 1396.08 feet along the southerly boundary of Valley
View Subdivision No. 1, as shown on the official plat thereof on file in the
Office of the Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, in Book 6, on Page 14 of
Plats, to the right bank of the North Fork of the Payette River,
thence, perpendicular to said right bank, southeasterly to the high water mark
on the left bank of said Payette River,
thence, northerly along said high water mark to a point perpendicular to the
mouth of Williams Creek,
thence, westerly, along the center line of Williams Creek to its intersection
with the westerly right-of-way of Coy Road,
thence, N. 19° 52' 20" W., 183.85 feet along said right-of-way to the southeast
corner of Lot 8, Amended Pine Terrace Subdivision No. 1, as shown on the
official plat thereof on file in the Office of the Recorder of Valley County,
Idaho, in Book 7 , on Page 54 of Plats,
thence, West, 668.12 feet to the southwest corner of said Lot 8,
thence, S. 0° 20' 44" E., 831.90 feet to the Point of Beginning.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
On JULY 20, 1993, at 7:00 P. M. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the
Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of McCall will hold A PUBLIC HEARING at
216 E. Park Street, McCall, Idaho (that is, at City Hall, in the American Legion meeting
room) TO CONSIDER THE APPROPRIATE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION OF
VARIOUS PROPER IThS IN THE AREAS included in, the areas surrounding, and the areas
surrounded by RIO VISTA, PINE TERRACE, and VALLEY VIEW, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT "A", IN CONNECTION WITH the
possibility of the ANNEXATION of some or all of these areas.
Dated: June 28, 1993
Planning & Zoning Clerk
Exhibit "A"
THE LANDS WHICH MAY BE ANNEXED CONSIST OF ONE OR MORE OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED AREAS, OR ANY COMBINATION THEREOF, OR ANY
COMBINATION OF PARTS THEREOF:
AREA ONE
Commencing at a 5/8" rebar marking the S 1/16 Corner common to Sections 7
and 8, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., a point on the existing City Limits of the City
of McCall, Valley County, Idaho, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING:
Thence, N. 89° 44' 19" W., 415.60 feet along the northerly boundary of the SE
1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said Section 7 and such City Limits,
thence, S. 0° 13' 05" W., 1322.49 feet to the line common to Sections 7 and
18, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., City of McCall, Valley County, Idaho,
thence, N. 89° 56' 10" E., 718.11 feet to the Section Corner common to said
Sections 7, 8, 17 and 18,
thence, south, along the westerly right-of-way of Boydstun Street to its
intersection with the northerly right-of-way of West Valley Road,
thence, S. 0° 02' 46" E., 35 feet to the northwest corner of Mccall Industrial
Park, as shown on the official plat thereof on file in the office of the Recorder
of Valley County, Idaho, in Book 8, on Page 11 of Plats,
thence, S. 0° 02' 46" E., 662.01 feet to the southwest corner of said McCall
Industrial Park,
thence, N. 89° 56' 10" E., 718.11 feet to the southeast corner of said McCall
Industrial Park,
thence, S. 0° 10' 00" W., 993.45 feet to the C-N-NW-SW 1/256 corner of said
Section 17,
thence, S. 89° 05' 52" E., 1337.13 feet to the C-N-NE-SW 1/256 corner of said
Section 17,
thence, N. 0° 10' 42" E., 330.99 feet to the C-E-W 1/64 corner of said Section
17,
thence, S. 89° 52' 18" E., 668.60 feet to a brass cap marking the Center 1/4
Corner of said Section 17,
thence, continuing S. 89° 52' 18" E., 850 feet, more or less, along the east -west
center section line of said Section 17, to its intersection with the left bank of
the North Fork of the Payette River, a point on the existing City Limits of the
City of McCall,
thence, northerly and westerly along such City Limits and said left bank to its
intersection with the extended north boundary of Government Lot 10, Section
8,
thence, N. 89° 57' 30" W., 1,700 feet, more or less, along said north boundary
and such City Limits to the Point of Beginning.
AREA TWO
Commencing at the northwest corner of Mccall Industrial Park, as shown on
the official plat thereof on file in the office of the Recorder of Valley County,
Idaho, in Book 8, on Page 11 of Plats; thence, N. 0° 02' 46" W., 35 feet to the
northerly right-of-way of West Valley Road, the REAL POINT OF
BEGINNING:
Thence, S. 89° 59' 00" W., 1360 feet, more or less, along said northerly right-of-way to
the westerly right-of-way of Wisdom Road,
thence, S. 0° 01' 59" W., 1395 feet, more or less, along said westerly right-of-
way extended to the southerly right-of-way of West Valley Road,
thence, S. 89° 52' 39" E., 35 feet, more or less to the northwest corner of
Amended Pine Terrace Addition No. 1, as shown on the official plat thereof on
file in the office of the Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, in Book 7, on Page
54 of Plats,
thence, S. 0° 20' 44" E., 1,750.03 feet to the southwest corner of Lot 8, said
Amended Pine Terrace Addition No. 1,
thence, East, 668.12 feet to the southeast corner of said Lot 8, on the westerly
right-of-way of Coy Road,
thence, S. 19° 52' 20" E., 183.85 feet along said westerly right-of-way to its
intersection with the centerline of Williams Creek,
thence, easterly, along said creek center line to the center line of the North Fork
of the Payette River,
thence, southerly to the high water mark on the left bank of said North Fork of
the Payette River,
thence, easterly and northerly along the high water mark of said left bank to its
intersection with a line parallel to and 520 feet south of the line common to
Sections 17 and 20, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., Valley County, Idaho,
thence, easterly to the southwest comer of the existing City Limits,
thence, N. 0° 42' 00" W., 520.00 feet along the existing City Limits to the line
common to said Sections 17 and 20,
thence, West along said common line to its intersection with the high water
mark on the left bank of the North Fork of the Payette River,
thence, northerly along said high water mark to its intersection with the east
boundary of Government Lot 6, said Section 17,
thence, north, 1360 feet, more or less, along said east boundary to the CE 1/16
Corner of said Section 17,
thence, N. 89° 52' 18" W., 1320 feet, more or less, to a brass cap marking the
Center n Corner of said Section 17,
thence, N. 89° 52' 18" W., 668.60 feet to the C-E-W 1/64 comer of said Section
17,
thence, S. 0° 10' 42" W., 330.99 feet to the C-N-NE-SW 1/256 corner of said
Section 17,
thence, N. 89° 05' 52" W., 1337.13 feet to the C-N-NW-SW 1/256 corner of
said Section 17,
thence, N. 0° 10' 00" E., 993.45 feet to the southeast corner of said McCall
Industrial Park,
thence, S. 89° 56' 10" W., 718.11 feet to the southwest corner of said McCa11
Industrial Park,
thence, N. 0° 02' 46" W., 697.01 feet to the Point of Beginning.
AREA THREE
Commencing at a brass cap marking the E 1/16 Corner common to Sections 18
and 19, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., Valley County, Idaho, being the northwest
corner of Valley View Subdivision No. 3, as shown on the official plat thereof
on file in the Office of the Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, in Book 7 , on
Page 28 of Plats, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING:
thence, along the boundary of said Valley View Subdivision No. 3,
S. 0° 49' 52" W., 2546.61 feet; S. 44° 28' 57" E., 70.32 feet; S. 89° 47' 45" E.,
607.03 feet to the southeast corner of said Valley View Subdivision No. 3,
thence, along the boundary of Valley View Subdivision No. 2, as shown on the
official plat thereof on file in the Office of the Recorder of Valley County,
Idaho, in Book 7, on Page 8 of Plats,
continuing S. 89° 47' 45" E., 290.00 feet; N. 15° 33' 16" E., 91.13 feet; N. 40°
39' 22" E., 231.10 feet; N. 21 ° 11' 39" E., 262.77 feet; N. 34° 30' 59" E., 392.19
feet; N. 82° 26' 03" E., 250.73 feet; N. 80° 05' 32" E., 306.62 feet; N. 74° 06'
31" E., 306.88 feet to the southeast comer of said Valley View Subdivision No.
2,
thence, S. 79° 27' 13" E., 1396.08 feet along the southerly boundary of Valley
View Subdivision No. 1, as shown on the official plat thereof on file in the
Office of the Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, in Book 6, on Page 14 of
Plats, to the right bank of the North Fork of the Payette River,
thence, perpendicular to said right bank, southeasterly to the high water mark
on the left bank of said Payette River,
thence, northerly along said high water mark to a point perpendicular to the
mouth of Williams Creek,
thence, westerly, along the center line of Williams Creek to its intersection
with the westerly right-of-way of Coy Road,
thence, N. 19° 52' 20" W., 183.85 feet along said right-of-way to the southeast
comer of Lot 8, Amended Pine Terrace Subdivision No. 1, as shown on the
official plat thereof on file in the Office of the Recorder of Valley County,
Idaho, in Book 7 , on Page 54 of Plats,
thence, West, 668.12 feet to the southwest corner of said Lot 8,
thence, S. 0° 20' 44" E., 831.90 feet to the Point of Beginning.
The
Star•News
P.O. Box 985 ' 1000 First Street
McCall, Idaho 83638 ' 634.2123
City of McCall
P.O. Box 1065
McCall, ID 83638
PAGE: 1
INVOICE NO.: 1212
INVOICE DATE: 7/1/93
CUSTOMER ID: CMCAL
TERMS: Net 30
CIE
ITEM / DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
Legal -Annexation
151.20
DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
Account 134.4•••., 4' c
Signature ?
Date_7(1/U
Other
McCALL PLANNING & ZONING
EXHIBIT
RECEIVED
SALES TAX
0.00
TOTAL INVOICE
151.20
Publisher's Affidavit of Publication
STATE OF IDAHO
.SS
County of Valley
1, Ramona A. George, being duly sworn and say, I am the receptionist
of The Central Idaho Star -News, a weekly newspaper published at McCall, in
the County of Valley, State of Idaho; that said newspaper is in general
circulation in the county of aforesaid and is a legal newspaper; that the
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, a copy of which is enclosed hereto and is a
part hereof, was published in said newspaper once a week for one consecutive
week in the regular and entire issue of every number there of during the period
of time of publication, and was published in the newspaper proper and not in a
supplement; and that publication of such notice began July 1, 1993 and ended
, 1993.
SuBscr bed and sworn before mday of July, 1993.
STATE OF IDAHO
COUNTY OF VALLEY
On this 1st day of July, in the year of 1993, before me, a Notary
Public, personally appeared Ramona A. George, known or identified to me to
be the person whose name subscribed to the within instrument, and being by
me first duly sworn, declared that the statements therein are true, and acknowl-
edged to me that she executed the same.
Tom Grote
Notary Public" for Idaho
Residing at McCall, Idaho
Commission Expires: 1999
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
OnJULY20,1993,at.7:00P.M.oras
soon thereafter as the matter may be
j heard, the Planning and Zoning
Commission of the City of McCall will
` hold A PUBLIC HEARING at 216 E.
Park Street, McCall, Idaho (that is, at
City Hall, in the American Legion
meeting room) TO .CONSIDER THE
APPROPRIATE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION OF VARIOUS
PROPERTIES IN THE AREAS included,
in, the areas surrounding, and the areas
surrounded by RIO VISTA,. PINE
TERRACE; and VALLEY VIEW, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ON
EXHIBIT "A", IN CONNECTION'
.WITH the possibility of the
ANNEXATION of some or all of these
areas.
Dated: June 28,1993
Sue Davidson,
Planning & Zoning Clerk
Exhibit "A"
THE • LANDS WHICH MAY BE
ANNEXED CONSIST OF ONE OR
MORE OF THE FOLLOWING
DESCRIBED AREAS, OR ANY
COMBINATION THEREOF, . OR ANY
COMBINATION OF PARTS THEREOF:
AREA ONE
Commencing at a 5/8 rebar marking
the S 1 / 16 Corner common to Sections 7
and 8, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., a point on
the existing City Limits of the City of
McCall, Valley County, Idaho, the
REAL POINT OF BEGINNING:
Thence, N. 89' 44' 19" W., 415.60 feet
'along the northerly boundary of the. SE
1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said Section 7 and
such City Limits, '
• thence,,S. 0' 13' 05" W., 1322.49 feet
to the line common to Sections 7.and 18,
T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., City of McCall,
Valley County, Idaho,
thence, N.•89° 56' 10" E., 718.1.1 feet
to the Section Corner common to said
Sections 7, 8,17 and 18,
thence, south, along the westerly
right-of-way of Boydstun Street to its
intersection with the northerly right-
of-way of West Valley Road, •
thence, S. 0' 02' 46' E., 35 feet to the
northwest corner of Mccall Industrial.
Park, as shown on the official plat
thereof on file in the office of the
Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, in
Book 8, on Page 11 of Plats,
thence, S. 0' 02' 46" E., 662.01 feet to
the southwest corner of said McCall
Industrial Park,
thence, N. 89' 56' 10" E., 718.11 feet
to the southeast corner of said McCall
Industrial Park,
thence, S. 0' 10' 00" W., 993.45 feet to
the C-N-NW-SW 1/256 corner of said
Section 17,
thence, S. 89' 05' 52" E., 1337.13 feet
to the C-N-NE-SW 1 /256 corner of said
Section 17,
thence, N. 0' 10' 42" E., 330.99 feet to
the C-E-W 1./64 corner of said Section
17,
thence, S. 89' 52' 18" E., 668.60 feet to
a brass cap marking the Center 1/4
Corner of said Section 17,
thence, continuing S. 89' 52' 18" E.,
850 feet, more or less, along the east -
west center section line of said' Section
17, to its intersection with the left bank
of the North Fork of the Payette River,
a point on the existing City Limits of
the City of McCall,
thence, northerly and westerly along
such City Limits and, said left bank to.
its intersection with the extended north
boundary of Government Lot 10, Section
8,•
thence, N. 89' 57' 30" W., 1,700 feet
more or less, along said north boundar
and such City Limits to the Point of
Beginning.
AREA TWO
Commencing at the northwest corner
of Mccall Industrial Park, as shown on
the official plat thereof -on file in the
office of the Recorder of Valley County,
Idaho, in Book 8, on Page 11 of Plats;
thence, N. 0' 02' 46" W., 35' feet to the
northerly right-of-way of West Valley
Road, the REAL POINT OF
BEGINNING:
Thence, S. 89' 59' 00" W.; 1360 feet,
more or less, along said northerly right-
1' of -way to the westerly right-of-way of
Wisdom Road,
thence, S. 0' 01' 59" W., 1395 feet,
more or. less, along said westerly right-
of-way extended to the southerly right-
' of-wayof_West_Vallev Road,,___
--thence, S. 89' 52' 34"E 35 feet; more "---
or less to , the northwest corner of
Amended Pine Terrace AdditionNo. 1,
as shown on the official plat thereof on -
file in the office of the Recorder of
Valley County, Idaho, in Book 7, on
Page 54 of Plats,
thence, S. 0' 20' 44" E., 1,750.03 feet
to the southwest corner of Lot 8, said)
Amended Pine Terrace Addition No. 1,
thence, East, 668.12 feet to the south-
east corner of said Lot 8, on the westerly
right-of-way of Coy Road,
thence, S. 19' 52' 20" E., 183.85 feet
along said westerly right-of-way to its
intersection with the centerline of
Williams Creek,
thence, easterly, along said creek
center line to, the center line of the
North Fork of the Payette River,
thence, southerly to the high water
mark on the left bank of said, North
Fork of the Payette River,
thence, easterly and northerly along
the high water mark of said left bank to
its intersection with a line parallel 'to
and,520 feet south of the line common to
Sections 17 and 20, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M„
Valley County, Idaho;
thence, easterly to the southwest
corner of the existing City Limits,
thence, N. 0° 42' 00" W., 520.00 feet
along the existing City Limit to the
line common to said Sections 17 and 20,
thence, West along'said.corimmon line
.to its intersection with the high water ,
mark on the left bank of the North Fork
of the Payette River,
thence,northerly along said high
water mark to its intersection with the •
east boundary of Government Lot 6, said
Section 17,
thence, north, 1360 feet, more or less,
along said east boundary to the CE 1/16
Corner of said Section 17,
thence, N. 89' 52' 18" W., 1320 feet,
more or less, to a brass cap marking the
Center a Corner of said Section 17,
thence, N. 89' 52' 18" W., 668.60 feet
to. the C-E-W 1/64 corner of said Section
17,
thence, S. 0' 10' 42" W., 330.99 feet 'to
the C-N-NE-SW 1/256 corner of said
Section 17,
thence, N. 89° 05' 52" W.,1337.13 feet
to the C-N-NW-SW 1/256 corner of said
Section 17,
thence, N. 0° 10' 00" E., 993.45 feet to
the southeast corner of said McCall
Industrial. Park,
thence, S. 89° 56' 10" W.,'718.11 feet
to the southwest corner of said McCall
Industrial Park,
thence, N. 0' 02' 46" W., 697.01 feet
to the Point of Beginning.
AREA THREE
Commencing at a brass cap marking -
the E 1/16 Corner common to Sections 18
and 19, T. 18 N., R..3, E., B.M., Valley
County, Idaho, being the northwest
corner of Valley View Subdivision No.
3, as shown on the official plat thereof
on file in the Office of the Recorder of
Valley County, Idaho, in Book 7 , on
•Page 28 of Plats, the REAL POINT OF
BEGINNING:
thence, along the boundary of said
Valley View Subdivision No. 3,
S. 0' 49' 52" W.,'2546.61 feet; S. 44° 28'
57" E., 70.32 feet; S. 89° 47', 45" E., 607.03
feet to the southeast corner of said
Valley View Subdivision No. 3,
thence, along the boundary of Valley
View Subdivision No. 2, as shown on the
official plat thereof on file in the
Office of the Recorder of Valley County,
Idaho, in Book 7, on Page 8 of Plats, con-
tinuing S. 89' 47' 45" E., 290.00 feet; N.
15 33r 16" E., 91.13 feet; N. 40' 39' 22"
E., 231.10 feet; N. 21' 11' 39" E., 262.77
feet; N. 34° 30' 59" E., 392.19 feet; N. 82'
26' 03" E., 250.73 feet; N. 80' 05' 32" E.,
306.62 feet; N. 74' 06' 31" E.,,306.88 feet
to the southeastcorner of said Valley
View Subdivision No. 2,
thence, S. 79' 27' 13" E., 1396.08 feet
along the southerly boundary of Valley
View Subdivision No. 1, as shown on the
official plat thereof on file in' the
Office of the Recorder of Valley County,
Idaho, in Book 6, on Page 14 of Plats, to
the right bank of the. North Fork of the
Payette River, •
thence, perpendicular to said right
bank,/southeasterly to the high water
mark on the left bank of said Payette
River,
thence, northerly along said high
water mark .to a point perpendicular to
the mouth of Williams Creek,
thence, westerly, along thecenter
line of Williams Creek to its intersec-
•tion with the westerly right-of-way of
Coy Road,
thence, N. 19' 52' 20" W., 183.85 feet -
along said right-of-way to the south-
east corner of Lot 8, Amended Pine
Terrace Subdivision No. 1, as shown on
the official plat thereof on file in the,
Office of the Recorder of Valley County,
Idaho, in Book 7., on Page 54 of Plats,
thence, West, 668.12 feet to the
southwest corner of said Lot 8, .
thence, S. 0° 20' 44" E., 831.90 feet to
the Point of Beginning. 1t7/1
TO: City Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: City Administrator
RE: Annexation Report, Rio Vista
I. ISSUES:
The question is whether to annex certain parcels on the West side
of McCall. This matter has been referred to the Commission by the
City Council. A copy of thayor's letter to the Council
leading to this directio s attached.
The area has been broken into three separate parcels for your
consideration. For ease of reference, we will call these areas,
Rio Vista for area I, Blue Jay for Area II and Valley View for
area III. You may recommend annexation of some, all or none of
the three areas. If annexation is recommended, you must also
recommend zoning for the areas.
II. DISCUSSION:
AREA I
(RIO VISTA AREA)
This area generally includes all of the Rio Vista subdivisions,
the city's wastewater plant, the McCall Industrial Park and other
parcels. The area is bounded by the Old Lardo town site, the
Payette River, Boydstun Street and the city's property for the
sewage treatment plant.
A. ZONING: The current zoning of the area is for Impact area
Zone A, Low density residential for the subdivided area,
Industrial for the Industrial Park and treatment plant, and
possibly some zone E property in the gravel pit area.
B. WATER: The Rio Vista Subdivisions are served in large part
by city water service. Along Boydstun St, the Industrial Park
and certain 5 ac. parcels along Rio Vista Blvd are not served by
city water service.
The original installation of inadequately sized lines
within the subdivisions will require installation of an
additional large main, planned as part of the water system
improvements to provide adequate service for this area. To the
MALL PLANNING & LIMING
EXHIBIT
RECEIVED
pressure
during summer months. Other system problems include:
2" dead-end line on Chula St.
4" line along Cammy Dr.
stubs, supposed to be in place, often do not exist
2' line on Cece Way needs replacement
4" line on Rio Vista (main feed to area) undersized
for fireflow
C. SEWER:
The developed area is largely served by city sewer. River
frontages along Cammy Dr., Memo Circle and Chula are on septic
tanks. The Industrial Park area is served by the Payette Lakes
Water and Sewer District.
The capacity of the collection system is not an issue in
the area. However, multiple homes on a 4" service line,
non-existent stubs, and unserved areas along the River will need
to be resolved as development occurs.
D. STREETS:
In the area there are approximately 4.5 miles of streets
currently maintained by Valley County or as private streets.
Of these, approximately 2.2 miles are paved, and 2.3 miles are
gravel surfaced.
Rights of way are 60'and 70'in width.
Specific problems are Memo Circle, Cammy Dr. and Chula Rd.
none of which are built to city standards and which are dead-end
and steep.
Road maintenance represents the major service cost for
public utilities if the annexation were approved.
E. POLICE:
The population of this area is estimated at 365 residents.
If police problems are viewed as a function of population, the
city currently provides 1 sworn officer for each 286 persons.
This would translate into an additional workload for 1 1/2
officers. Response time into the area is somewhat longer than to
the current city. Response to the area becomes a particular
problem during busy summer weekends and the congestion on Highway
55 and the Lardo Bridge. Overall response by the City police
should improve the time which residents receive service. County
response for routine matters can be lengthy.
F. FIRE: The area is currently served by the Rural Fire
District. Taxes now levied by the District would not be assessed
after annexation, offsetting the city taxes to be increased.
The District's loss would be approximately $9,000.
Again, with no other access to the area than the Lardo
bridge, response during high traffic periods will be impaired.
That situation exists at this time with the same apparatus
responding from the same station.
The ISO rating could be affected by annexation in that
response times are calculated as a part of the city's insurance
rating.
The City has, since 1986, been inadequately equipped to pump
water and this annexation will exacerbate the problem.
G. LEISURE SERVICES:
The City Library currently serves out of city residents
through purchasing of a library card. By annexation, all
residents would have free access to the Library and that service
would sustain an $875 loss..
Recreation services have no surcharge for out of city users
and the annexation would have no impact on the program.
H. TAXES':
The increased taxes to the city would yield approximately
$91,000 each year. This includes property and other shared
revenues which are based on population. The AMV for the area is
$12,011,627 (net homeowners exemption).
To restate, the Fire District levy would be deleted and the
full impact of the city tax burden would be offset by that
deletion.
AREA II
(BLUE JAY AREA)
This area includes the Blue Jay Subdivision, and portions of
Pine Terrace Nos. 1 and 2.
A. ZONING: The area is currently zoned Urban Agriculture and
Residential, Zones E and A respectively.
B. WATER: There is no city water service to the area. All
developed sites are served by wells.
C. SEWER: There is no central sanitary sewers in the area.
All developed sites are served by septic tanks. Grounds
throughout the area percolate well.
D. STREETS: There are 1.91 miles of streets in the area, all
of which are gravel surfaced and all of which have 70' right of
ways.
E. POLICE: Services to the 20 residents are now provided by
the Valley County Sheriff. Response times to these locations
deteriorate further than from area I above. No additional
manpower could be justified at this time by the population.
F. FIRE: The area is currently served by the McCall Rural
Fire District. As in area I, the fire district taxes would be
deleted upon annexation. The same response time issues are
relevant as are discussed for area I as well.
G. LEISURE SERVICES: The Library will lose approximately
$30 from the 2 out of city card holders who would receive free
services. There is no impact on recreation services.
H. TAXES: Additional tax revenue would be $4,275. net of
homeowners exemption. The AMV for the area is $662,999.
AREA III
VALLEY VIEW AREA
This area includes all of Valley View Subdivision and portions
of Pine Terrace No. 1 and Pine Terrace 2.
A. ZONING: The area is zoned E, Urban Agricultural and Zone
A, Residential, Impact zones.
B. WATER: There is no city service in the area. The
developed sites are on individual wells.
C. SEWER: There is no central sanitary service serving the
area. The developed sites are all served by septic systems. As
much as 30% of the area will not percolate to permit septic
systems. Some have installed above ground disposal systems.
D. STREETS: There are approximately 2 miles of roads in the
area. All are gravel surfaced and on 70' rights of way.
E. POLICE: The area is served by the Valley County Sheriff's
office. If annexed, city responses would be improved over
existing services, but as before, response times at peak
activity times will be impaired. 30 people claim residency in
the area, which would not alone justify additional officers.
F. FIRE: The area is within the McCall Rural Fire District
and the comments related to area II above apply to this area.
G. LEISURE SERVICES: The Library has three out of city
borrowers, representing a $45 loss to the operation, if annexed.
There is no impact on recreation services.
H. TAXES: Annexation would yield $18,600 in additional tax
revenues. The AMV for the area is $3,011,454.
III. RECOMMENDATIONS:
A principle of planning is that residential areas never
yield sufficient tax revenues to pay for the services which are
given. One of the ways to mitigate this is to allow the area to
develop so as to yield the maximum tax revenue upon annexation.
Based upon that principle, the staff recommends annexation of
only Area I. Areas II and III are insufficiently developed to
warrant street maintenance (which is the same cost whether
developed or undeveloped), police and other services.
While all of the area is within future utility boundaries, to
undertake installation at this time, given the other obligations
of the systems, is unjustifiable. If annexed, those property.
owners would view themselves as entitled to those services.
Further, if annexed, the following conditions should be
noted:
1. Construction of the Deinhard-Boydstun Connector should
be aggressively pursued for no other reasons than to provide
better response for public safety services to the area and a
second river crossing for improved traffic flow in the community.
2. The agreement with Valley County to plow the roads for
the year following annexation should be undertaken.
3. Additional fire apparatus should be acquired by the
city.
4. Additional equipment (one truck plow) should be added
to the public works fleet with one additional operator.
5. One additional police officer should be added to the
force.
6. An LID for resolving the substandard streets, sewer and
water lines should be imposed.
If annexed, the staff recommends that the Area I be zoned A,
Residential (City), and E, Industrial (City zoning) reflecting
the current uses of the properties.
AJS
6-16-93
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF McCALL, IDAHO, ANNE)
PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND ZONING IT TO BE I
"A", LOW -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; IN PART ZONE "B",
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; AND IN PART ZONE "I", INDU `ix ii-tL,
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
McCALL, IDAHO, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Mayor and Council find that the property
described on Exhibit "A" to this Ordinance is land contiguous
to the City of McCall, which may be annexed by the City
pursuant to applicable State law. The Mayor and Council find
that the requisite notices have been given and the requisite
hearings have been conducted.
Section 2. The property described on Exhibit "A" is
annexed by and into the City of McCall.
Section 3 The property descrir
placed on the official zoning rm-�
part into Zone "A", Low-Densit;
into ZONE "B", Medium Density P
Zone "I", Industrial, all as mo:
Exhibit "B" to this Ordinance.
date and the number of this Ordii
this property.
"A" is
lance in
t, in part
trt in
ut on
-se the
Map on
Section 4. This Ordinance sha in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication
as required by law, and the filing by the Clerk of a
certified copy of this Ordinance with each of the following:
the Valley County auditor, treasurer, and assessor, and the
State of Idaho Tax Commission.
Passed and approved , 1993
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
Exhibit "A"
Ordinance No. 625, February 25, 1993
NleCALL PLANNING & ZONING
EXHIBIT
RECEIVED���
page 1
Description of portions of section 3, T.18 N., R.3 E., B. M.
to be annexed to the Corporate limits of the City of McCall.
Those portions of the NW 1/4 SW 1/4, the NE 1/4 SW 1/4 the NW
1/4 SE 1/4 and the SW 1/4 SE 1/4 of Section 3, T.18 N., R.3
E., B. M., lying south of the southerly line of Ponderosa
State Park, as shown on a record of survey filed in the
office of the Valley County Recorder in Book 2 on page 88A;
west of the easterly line of Pilgrim Cove Rd, as shown on the
Plat of the C-Way Subdivision, filed in book 6, page 23, and
the plat of the D & S Subdivision, filed in book 5, page 32;
north of the southerly line of Lick Creek Road in the SW 1/4
SE 1/4 of said section 3, north of the south line of Chipmunk
Lane in the NE 1/4 SW 1/4 and NW 1/4 SW 1/4 of said section
3; and east of the west line of Carrico Road in said NW 1/4
SW 1/4 SW 1/4, said parcel to be annexed thus being
contiguous to the City Limits of the City of McCall on
virtually all of three sides, being more particularly
described as follows:
Beginning at the point of intersection of the easterly line
of Carrico Road with the northerly line of the NW 1/4 SW 1/4
of said section 3, said point being in the southerly line of
said Ponderosa State Park, being a point on the City Limits
of the City of McCall, and being located S. 89° 44'01" E.,
25.00 feet from the west 1/4 corner of said section 3;
1. Thence S 89° 44' 01" E., 2564.92 feet along said
northerly line of the NW 1/4 SW 1/4 and of the NE 1/4 SW
1/4 of Section 3, being along the southerly line of said
Ponderosa State Park and along the City Limits of the
City of McCall, to the center 1/4 corner of said section
3;
2. Thence S 89° 39' 51" E., 261.11 feet along said
southerly line of said Park, and along said City Limits
and the easterly extension thereof, and along the
northerly line of the NW 1/4 SE 1/4 of said section 3,
to the point of intersection of said line with the
easterly line of Pilgrim Cove Road;
3. Thence S. 0° 13' 39" W., 694.35 feet along said easterly
line of Pilgrim Cove Road, being along the westerly
lines of Lots 25, 26, 36 and 1 of the C-Way Subdivision,
to the southwest corner of said Lot 1;
4. Thence N. 89° 46' 21" E., 10.00 feet along the southerly
line of said Lot 1 of the C-Way Subdivision to the
northwest corner of Lot 6 of the D & S Subdivision;
5. Thence S. 0° 13' 39" W., 660.00 feet along the westerly
lines of Lots 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1 of said D & S
Subdivision, being along the easterly line of said
Pilgrim Cove Road and continuing across Lick Creek Road
Ordinance No. 625, February 25, 1993 page 2
to a point in the southerly line of said Lick Creek
Road;
6. Thence N. 89° 31' 21" W., 243.38 feet along the
southerly line of said Lick Creek Road to the point of
intersection of same with the westerly line of the SW
1/4 SE 1/4 of said section 3 and the existing City
Limits of the City of McCall;
7. Thence N. 0° 56' 44" W., 167.56 feet along said westerly
line of said SW 1/4 SE 1/4 across Lick Creek Road, and
along said City Limits and the westerly line of the NW
1/4 SE 1/4 of said section 3 to the point of
intersection of same with the southerly line of Chipmunk
Lane;
8. Thence N. 89° 45' 09" W., 2572.61 feet through the NE
1/4 SW 1/4 and the NW 1/4 SW 1/4 of section 3, along the
southerly line of Chipmunk Lane and through the
northerly 15 feet more or less of Lots 13, 18, 19, 20,
21, 22, 23, 24, and 25 of the 19th Holes Estates
Subdivision, and along said City Limits, to the point of
intersection of said line with the easterly line of
Carrico Road;
9. Thence N. 0° 08' 59" E., 50.00 feet along such City
Limits across Chipmunk Lane to a point in the northerly
line of Chipmunk Lane;
10. Thence N. 89° 45' 09" 15.06 feet along such City Limits
and said northerly line of Chipmunk Lane to the point of
intersection of same with the easterly line of Carrico
Road;
11. Thence N 0° 08'59" E., 1137.78 feet along said easterly
line of Carrico Road and the City Limits of the City of
McCall to the point of intersection of same with the
northerly line of said NW 1/4 SW 1/4, being the point of
beginning;
Said parcel to be annexed contains 78.04 acres, more or less.
Ordinance No. 625, February 25, 1993 page 3
AREA ONE
Commencing at a 5/8" rebar marking the S 1/16 Corner common
to Sections 7 and 8, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., City of McCall,
Valley County, Idaho, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING:
Thence, N. 89° 44' 19" W., 415.60 feet along the northerly
boundary of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said Section 7,
thence, S. 0° 13' 05" W., 1322.49 feet to the line common to
Sections 7 and 18, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., City of McCall,
Valley County, Idaho,
thence, N. 89° 56' 10" E., 718.11 feet to the Section Corner
common to said Sections 7, 8, 17 and 18,
thence, south, along the westerly right-of-way of Boydstun
Street to its intersection with the northerly right-of-way of
West Valley Road,
thence, S. 0° 02' 46" E., 35 feet to the northwest corner of
Mccall Industrial Park, as shown on the official plat thereof
on file in the office of the Recorder of Valley County,
Idaho, in Book 8, on Page 11 of Plats,
thence, S. 0° 02' 46" E., 662.01 feet to the southwest corner
of said McCall Industrial Park,
thence, N. 89° 56' 10" E., 718.11 feet to the southeast
corner of said McCall Industrial Park,
thence, S. 0° 10' 00" W., 993.45 feet to the C-N-NW-SW 1/256
corner of said Section 17,
thence, S. 89° 05' 52" E., 1337.13 feet to the C-N-NE-SW
1/256 corner of said Section 17,
thence, N. 0° 10' 42" E., 330.99 feet to the C-E-W 1/64
corner of said Section 17,
thence, S. 89° 52' 18" E., 668.60 feet to a brass cap marking
the Center 1/4 Corner of said Section 17,
thence, continuing S. 89° 52' 18" E., 850 feet, more or less,
along the east -west center section line of said Section 17,
to its intersection with the left bank of the North Fork of
the Payette River,
thence, northerly and westerly along said left bank to its
intersection with the extended north boundary of Government
Lot 10, Section 8,
thence, N. 89° 57' 30" W., 1,700 feet, more or less, along
said north boundary to the Point of Beginning.
AREA TWO
Commencing at the northwest corner of Mccall Industrial Park,
as shown on the official plat thereof on file in the office of
the Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, in Book 8, on Page 11 of
Plats; thence, N. 0° 02' 46" W., 35 feet to the northerly
right-of-way of West Valley Road, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING:
Thence, S. 89° 59' 00" W., 1360 feet, more or less, along said
northerly right-of-way to the westerly right-of-way of Wisdom Road,
thence, S. 0° 01' 59" W., 1395 feet, more or less, along said
westerly right-of-way extended to the southerly right-of-way
of West Valley Road,
thence, S. 89° 52' 39" E., 35 feet, more or less to the
northwest corner of Amended Pine Terrace Addition No. 1, as
shown on the official plat thereof on file in the office of
the Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, in Book 7, on Page 54 of
Plats,
thence, S. 0° 20' 44" E., 1,750.03 feet to the southwest
corner of Lot 8, said Amended Pine Terrace Addition No. 1,
thence, East, 668.12 feet to the southeast corner of said Lot
8, on the westerly right-of-way of Coy Road,
thence, S. 19° 52' 20" E., 183.85 feet along said westerly
right-of-way to its intersection with the centerline of
Williams Creek,
thence, easterly, along said creek center line to the center
line of the North Fork of the Payette River,
thence, southerly to the high water mark on the left bank of
said North Fork of the Payette River,
thence, easterly and northerly along the high water mark of
said left bank to its intersection with a line parallel to and
520 feet south of the line common to Sections 17 and 20, T. 18
N., R. 3 E., B.M., Valley County, Idaho,
thence, easterly to the southwest corner of the existing City
Limits,
thence, N. 0° 42' 00" W., 520.00 feet along the existing City
Limits to the line common to said Sections 17 and 20,
thence, West along said common line to its intersection with
the high water mark on the left bank of the North Fork of the
Payette River,
thence, northerly along said high water mark to its
intersection with the east boundary of Government Lot 6, said
Section 17,
thence, north, 1360 feet, more or less, along said east
boundary to the CE 1/16 Corner of said Section 17,
thence, N. 89° 52' 18" W., 1320 feet, more or less, to a brass
cap marking the Center Corner of said Section 17,
thence, N. 89° 52' 18" W., 668.60 feet to the C-E-W 1/64
corner of said Section 17,
thence, S. 0° 10' 42" W., 330.99 feet to the C-N-NE-SW 1/256
corner of said Section 17,
thence, N. 89° 05' 52" W., 1337.13 feet to the C-N-NW-SW 1/256
corner of said Section 17,
thence, N. 0° 10' 00" E., 993.45 feet to the southeast corner
of said McCall Industrial Park,
thence, S. 89° 56' 10" W., 718.11 feet to the southwest corner
of said McCall Industrial Park,
thence, N. 0° 02' 46" W., 697.01 feet to the Point of
Beginning.
A.REA THREE
Commencing at a brass cap marking the E 1/16 Corner common to
Sections 18 and 19, T. 18 N., R. 3 E., B.M., Valley County,
Idaho, being the northwest corner of Valley View Subdivision
No. 3, as shown on the official plat thereof on file in the
Office of the Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, in Book 7 , on
Page 28 of Plats, the REAL POINT OF BEGINNING:
thence, along the boundary of said Valley View Subdivision No.
3,
S. 0° 49' 52" W., 2546.61 feet; S. 44° 28' 57" E., 70.32 feet;
S. 89° 47' 45" E., 607.03 feet to the southeast corner of said
Valley View Subdivision No. 3,
thence, along the boundary of Valley View Subdivision No. 2,
as shown on the official plat thereof on file in the Office of
the Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, in Book 7, on Page 8 of
Plats,
continuing S. 89° 47' 45" E., 290.00 feet; N. 15° 33' 16" E.,
91.13 feet; N. 40° 39' 22" E., 231.10 feet; N. 21° 11' 39" E.,
262.77 feet; N. 34° 30' 59" E., 392.19 feet; N. 82° 26' 03"
E., 250.73 feet; N. 80° 05' 32" E., 306.62 feet; N. 74° 06'
31" E., 306.88 feet to the southeast corner of said Valley
View Subdivision No. 2,
thence, S. 79° 27' 13" E., 1396.08 feet along the southerly
boundary of Valley View Subdivision No. 1, as shown on the
official plat thereof on file in the Office of the Recorder of
Valley County, Idaho, in Book 6, on Page 14 of Plats, to the
right bank of the North Fork of the Payette River,
thence, perpendicular to said right bank, southeasterly to the
high water mark on the left bank of said Payette River,
thence, northerly along said high water mark to a point
perpendicular to the mouth of Williams Creek,
thence, westerly, along the center line of Williams Creek to
its intersection with the westerly right-of-way of Coy Road,
thence, N. 19° 52' 20" W., 183.85 feet along said right-of-way
to the southeast corner of Lot 8, Amended Pine Terrace
Subdivision No. 1, as shown on the official plat thereof on
file in the Office of the Recorder of Valley County, Idaho, in
Book 7 , on Page 54 of Plats,
thence, West, 668.12 feet to the southwest corner of said Lot 8,
thence, S. 0° 20' 44" E., 831.90 feet to the Point of
Beginning.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF McCALL, IDAHO, ANNEXING THE REAL
PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND ZONING IT IN PART TO BE ZONE "A",
LOW -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, AND IN PART ZONE "E", INDUSTRIAL; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF McCALL,
IDAHO, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Mayor and Council find that the property described on Exhibit
"A" to this Ordinance is land contiguous to the City of McCall, which may be annexed by
the City pursuant to applicable State law. The Mayor and Council find that the requisite
notices have been given and the requisite hearings have been conducted.
Section 2. The property described on Exhibit "A" is annexed by and into the City
of McCa11. From and after the effective date of this Ordinance, the residents and other
occupants and property owners within such area shall enjoy all the rights and
responsibilities of their fellow residents, occupants, and owners within the City of
McCall.
Section 3. The property described on Exhibit "A" is placed on the official zoning
map and by this Ordinance into Zone "A", Low -Density Residential District, except for
that part thereof indicated on Exhibit "B", which is placed into Zone "E", Industrial. The
Clerk shall endorse the date and the number of this Ordinance upon the Zoning Map on
this property.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication as required by law, and the filinghv the Clerk of a
certified copy of this Ordinance with each of the following: they County auditor,
treasurer, and assessor, and the State of Idaho Tax CommissiP
Passed and approved , 1993
7
Lau.
Mayc
ATTEST:
Arthur J. Schmidt,
City Clerk
Ordinance No. , 1993 page 1
"
E x h i b i t " A "
C o m m e n c i n g a t a 5 / 8 " r e b a r m a r k i n g t h e S 1 / 1 6 C o r n e r c o m m o n t o
S e c t i o n s 7 a n d 8 , T . 1 8 N . , R . 3 E . , B . M . , a p o i n t o n t h e e x i s t i n g C i t y
L i m i t s o f t h e C i t y o f M c C a l l , V a l l e y C o u n t y , I d a h o , t h e R E A L P O I N T O F
B E G I N N I N G :
T h e n c e , N . 8 9 � 4 4 ' 1 9 " W . , 4 1 5 . 6 0 f e e t a l o n g t h e n o r t h e r l y b o u n d a r y o f t h e
S E 1 / 4 o f t h e S E 1 / 4 o f s a i d S e c t i o n 7 a n d s u c h C i t y L i m i t s ,
t h e n c e , S . 0 � 1 3 ' 0 5 " W . , 1 3 2 2 . 4 9 f e e t t o t h e l i n e c o m m o n t o S e c t i o n s 7
a n d 1 8 , T . 1 8 N . , R . 3 E . , B . M . , C i t y o f M c C a l l , V a l l e y C o u n t y , I d a h o ,
t h e n c e , N . 8 9 � 5 6 ' 1 0 " E . , 7 1 8 . 1 1 f e e t t o t h e S e c t i o n C o r n e r c o m m o n t o
s a i d S e c t i o n s 7 , 8 , 1 7 a n d 1 8 ,
t h e n c e , s o u t h , a l o n g t h e w e s t e r l y r i g h t - o f - w a y o f B o y d s t u n S t r e e t t o i t s
i n t e r s e c t i o n w i t h t h e n o r t h e r l y r i g h t - o f - w a y o f W e s t V a l l e y R o a d ,
t h e n c e , S . 0 � 0 2 ' 4 6 " E . , 3 5 f e e t t o t h e n o r t h w e s t c o r n e r o f M c c a l l
I n d u s t r i a l P a r k , a s s h o w n o n t h e o f f i c i a l p l a t t h e r e o f o n f i l e i n t h e o f f i c e o f
t h e R e c o r d e r o f V a l l e y C o u n t y , I d a h o , i n B o o k 8 , o n P a g e 1 1 o f P l a t s ,
t h e n c e , S . 0 � 0 2 ' 4 6 " E . , 6 6 2 . 0 1 f e e t t o t h e s o u t h w e s t c o r n e r o f s a i d M c C a l l
I n d u s t r i a l P a r k ,
t h e n c e , N . 8 9 � 5 6 ' 1 0 " E . , 7 1 8 . 1 1 f e e t t o t h e s o u t h e a s t c o r n e r o f s a i d
M c C a l l I n d u s t r i a l P a r k ,
t h e n c e , S . 0 � 1 0 ' 0 0 " W . , 9 9 3 . 4 5 f e e t t o t h e C - N - N W - S W 1 / 2 5 6 c o r n e r o f
s a i d S e c t i o n 1 7 ,
t h e n c e , S . 8 9 � 0 5 ' 5 2 " E . , 1 3 3 7 . 1 3 f e e t t o t h e C - N - N E - S W 1 / 2 5 6 c o r n e r o f
s a i d S e c t i o n 1 7 ,
t h e n c e , N . 0 � 1 0 ' 4 2 " E . , 3 3 0 . 9 9 f e e t t o t h e C - E - W 1 / 6 4 c o r n e r o f s a i d
S e c t i o n 1 7 ,
t h e n c e , S . 8 9 � 5 2 ' 1 8 " E . , 6 6 8 . 6 0 f e e t t o a b r a s s c a p m a r k i n g t h e C e n t e r 1 / 4
C o r n e r o f s a i d S e c t i o n 1 7 ,
t h e n c e , c o n t i n u i n g S . 8 9 � 5 2 ' 1 8 " E . , 8 5 0 f e e t , m o r e o r l e s s , a l o n g t h e e a s t -
w e s t c e n t e r s e c t i o n l i n e o f s a i d S e c t i o n 1 7 , t o i t s i n t e r s e c t i o n w i t h t h e l e f t
b a n k o f t h e N o r t h F o r k o f t h e P a y e t t e R i v e r , a p o i n t o n t h e e x i s t i n g C i t y
L i m i t s o f t h e C i t y o f M c C a l l ,
t h e n c e , n o r t h e r l y a n d w e s t e r l y a l o n g s u c h C i t y L i m i t s a n d s a i d l e f t b a n k t o
i t s i n t e r s e c t i o n w i t h t h e e x t e n d e d n o r t h b o u n d a r y o f G o v e r n m e n t L o t 1 0 ,
S e c t i o n 8 ,
t h e n c e , N . 8 9 � 5 7 ' 3 0 " W . , 1 , 7 0 0 f e e t , m o r e o r l e s s , a l o n g s a i d n o r t h
b o u n d a r y a n d s u c h C i t y L i m i t s t o t h e P o i n t o f B e g i n n i n g .
O r d i n a n c e N o . , 1 9 9 3 p a g e 2
G EN.
DUSTRIA_
f
/;/
Sf
1111111111 I I11I1I1fltf
11 L
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
MEMORANDUM
Date: April 8, 1993
To: Bud
File No:
From: Ted
Re: Impact on office of CA from annexation of West
Side Areas
One direct impact I can forsee from this annexation is that
there will be some marginal number of misdemeanor and
infraction cases. Currently prosecution consumes about 25%
of my time. Over the course of the year I have been here
the time demand from prosecution has varied from 15% to 25%.
I would expect that there would be a statistically
significant increase. The result would be some impairment
of my ability to respond to needs on the civil and
"business" side.
Considering the geographical extent of the area, there will
be some simplification of my existance, in the sense that we
will for a significant number of zoning problems be free of
the confusion surrounding who can enforce the ordinances in
the Impact Area. There would probably be a spurt in
enforcement needs until the message was received that the
City means business.
The need for a part time deputy will surface sometime in the
next ten years, depending on how fast this place really
grows. The annexation may bring that moment closer, but
will not in and of itself presently create that need. In
either case, employing a paralegal/file clerk, as opposed to
a garden-variety secretary, will postpone the moment of
hiring a deputy for a considerable time.
McCACI_ PLANNING & AMINO
EXHIBIT `7
RECEIVED
MARCH 30, 1993
TO: Bud
FROM: Gloria/Library
RE: ANNEXATION/RIO VISTA I, BLUE JAY II, VALLEY VIEW III
AREA I
There are 159 homeowners in this area, we hav
borrowers. Because many of the Rio Vista residen
are in the city we have lost an additional 50 bo
would reflect a loss to the library of $1620.00
this area would show the greatest dollar loss o
AREA II
egistered
s feel they
rrowers. This
Annexation of
the library.
There are 23 homeowners in this area, e have 2 registered
borrowers.
AREA III
There are 17 homeowners in this area, w- have 3 registered
borrowers.
TOTAL LOSS $1695.00.
McCALL PLANNING & ZONING
EXHIBIT
RECEIVED
City of McCall
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
BOX 1065
McCALL, IDAHO 83638
March 26, 1993
To: Arthur J. Schmidt
City Administrator
From: Dale Points, Fire Chief
RE: Annexation Report
Accurately addressing the concerns related to the annexation of
Flynn Subdivision and the additional area around Carico Street
require we go back and look at the actions that have taken place
in 1992 and first quarter of 1993. The total buildable lots
annexed during this period of time is 1,000. These four
subdivisions, Woodlands, Payette Lakes Industrial, Spring
Mountain Ranch and Jacob Manor Mobile Park, will require water
and when using their projected build out we are looking at an
additional 104 units completed per year, for the next five years
(see attachment #1). These figures do not include any filling in
the existing city limits such as Evergreen Terrace, Timberlost V
and VI or Lake Forest Subdivision.
Letters received from engineers last year and this Spring clearly
indicated a concern in the amount of water we are able to deliver
during peak flow times. Peak flow time are concurrent with our
highest fire hazard period, which is mid and late summer. The
indication appears without adding additional service, we do not
have adequate fire flow and yet we have already added four
subdivisions and are considering adding more. There are several
low pressure zones around the city (see attachment #2) and at the
rate we are adding service areas, it appears that this problem
will continue to grow unless we increase our ability to produce
more water. Should we consider resolving our current water
problem before we add additional demands?
There are fifty three residences located in Flynn Subdivision and
the adjacent area and several of these are located on two dead
end streets that need to either be extended through or turned and
connected with a through street. This area is also a prime
example of the Wildland/Urban Interface problem that is steadily
growing in our area. Should a fire occur in this area and extend
into the surrounding forested area it could cut off the only
escape route, thus trapping fire fighters and residents
attempting to evacuate, which could result in a life threatening
situation (see attachment #3).
Part of the consideration to additional annexation
n? :11 PLMNING & ZONING
EXHIBIT
RECEIVEV
to the fire fighting apparatus the City now has on line. We were
advised in 1985 we need a minimum of 2500 GPM and had 1700 GPM,
thus we were operating at a 800 GPM deficiency. Today, eight
years later and many additional exposures, we have a total
pumping capability of 1750 GPM. Our biggest concern in 1985 was
structural protection, but we have in the last few years by the
addition of Spring Mountain, the Woodlands and Lake Forest added
a wildland exposure that could have devastating results should a
Interface fire occur. I look at Lowman, Crown Point and the Fire
Storm in Northern Idaho and know that this same disaster could
occur within our own City limits.
As you are aware we are scheduled to be rerated the week of the
16th of August by the Idaho Survey and Rating Bureau. We
currently have a ISO 6 rating in the City and I am concerned that
we will not be able to maintain this rating. The concern comes
from the multiple factors of added fire flow, pumping capacity
and added response time and distance (see attachment #4). The
Survey and Rating Bureau will pick at random fire calls we have
responded to and average our response time and the distance from
the station in miles along with the number of apparatus and
firemen who show up on the fire. Distance becomes a factor in
the equation when it exceeds one and one half (1 1/2) miles from
the fire station. The probability exists that extended distances
and longer response time to the areas being annexed will increase
our ISO rating. The growth in the number of responses has also
more than doubled in the last two years.
As we all know annexation is a process that must happen if a city
is to grow and prosper. The process, when done in a timely and
planned method provides better services and is to the benefit of
those annexed. The cooperation and concerns of agencies now
providing services is a consideration that should be evaluated
and proper adjustments addressed before annexation occurs. In
the case of Flynn Subdivision and proposed annexed areas the net
loss of revenue to the Rural Fire District is Two Thousand One
Hundred Fifty Two Dollars ($2,152) per year.
.2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
example #1
® CITY
WOODLANDS
SPRING MNT.
MOBILE HOME PARK
PAYETTE LAKES
INDUSTRIAL PARK
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
THE DATA IN THIS CHART REPRESENTS THE
INCREASE IN UNITS REQUIRING FIRE
PROTECTION WITHIN THE CITY OF McCALL
AI, I ER THE ANNEXATION OF THESE AREAS IN
1993 AN ADDITIONAL 104 UNITS PER YEAR
ARE GOING TO BE ADDED. THE AREA;
BREAKDOWN AS FOLLOWS:
WOODLANDS: 13 PER YEAR
SPRING MNT.: 65 PER YEAR
MOBILEHOME PARK: 20 PER YEAR
INDUSTRIAL PARK: 6 PER YEAR
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
.s. 1 I
>. .
sz iF+�1*t i� ':ii
AI"71 711` II + 11 _`411 11
1 II 11 11. 11 .11 11 1
I 11. II 11 11 11 it :1
I 11' II 1! 11 11 11 I
I .11- 11 II .11 ..11 II .:1
I 11 .11 11- 11 .11 II 1
1 M - 11 11 II 11 11 1
1..
0
U
BLUE JAY/PINE TE
E-1
124
Z
w
a
CITY PLUS AREA
INDICATED
+ CARICO
+ CARICO & RIO
VISTA
+CARICO, RIO
VISTA & BLUE JAY
ALL AREAS
INCLUDING SEWER
INDUSTRIAL AREA
THIS GRAPH SHOWS THE PROPOSED AREAS TC
BE ANNEXED. IT DOES NOT CONTAIN TF
ADDITIONAL 104 UNITS THAT ARE
PRESENTLY BEING ADDED PER YEAR.
example #2
IL R.
33
4
9
34
U90.
kiiikikibt5nnt
M/11.111
1114111=111113
PONDEROSA
STATE
PA R K
WI
.. Williiiiiiii.- li
.1 fa W
M MIAIIIIIIIIIIIIMM."
MM 610111111 I
MI ir ViniilaYr
ill 11 114P/ISailli°
1111111"ill IMIIIMMIO
Hill• II
/MD
C-WAY 3U90.
10
SEC.3. T.18141., R.3E.
0 EIS SU90.
Acts
34
10
35
2
Off
N.N.S
2
Existing Dead End Roads
0 250 500 1000
SCALE IN FCCT
•
1833
1800 I
PAGE
1821
1835
1820
Y4LLEY---02=a
ENGINEg?INF DEPARTMENT
. •
• '
CD
City of McCall
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
BOX 1065
McCALL, IDAHO 83638
March 26, 1993
To: Arthur J. Schmidt
City Administrator
From: Dale Points, Fire Chief
Re: Continuance of Annexation Report
The charts and graphs used in the Carico report also applies to
this report concerning additional areas under consideration for
annexation.
The concern of the Fire Department in the proposed annexation of
Rio Vista are the low water pressure and inadequate flows
available for fire protection. Some consideration must be given
to increasing distribution lines. The current system consists of
6" main, 4" feeder and 2" distribution lines. Inadequate
numbers and locations of hydrants are a problem throughout the
subdivision. At this time there are three dead end roads without
turn arounds and two of these are steeper and/or narrower than
allowed in the UFC. The distance from the fire station could
very well effect the up coming rerating of the City. This
possibly could be offset with another route across the river.
The topography and vegetation characteristics lends this entire
area to the possibility of a wildland conflagration.
The revenue generated from Rio Vista for the McCall rural Fire
District per year is Nine Thousand Ninety Three Dollars ($9,093).
The total dollars lost should Carico and area #1, 2, and 3 be
annexed would exceed Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000) or
approximately 12% of their budget.
Area two and three is a continuation and compounding of the
previously discussed concern and problem.
ANNEXATION REPORTS
1. CARRICO AREA:
This will be a separate report.
Address all concerns about the area related to your
department .
This report will be due on March 26 at noon.
2. RIO VISTA AREA:
Divide this report into three separte sections and address
your concerns by area.
This report will be due on April 2 at noon.
I. AREA I, RIO VISTA SUBDIVISIONS:
II.AREA II, BLUE JAY SUBDIVISION AREA:
III. AREA III, VALLEY VIEW SUBDIVISION AREA:
I will expect both reports to contain all of the relevant facts
you can gather and your recommendations in terms of your program
activities.
Bud
McCALL PLANNING & ZONING
EXHIBIT
RECEIVED
ANNEXATION REPORTS
1. CARRICO AREA:
This will be a separate report
Address all concerns about the area related to your
department .
This report will be due on March 26 at noon.
2. RIO VISTA AREA:
Divide this report into three separte sections and address
your concerns by area.
This report will be due on April 2 at noon.
I. AREA I, RIO VISTA SUBDIVISIONS:
II.AREA II, BLUE JAY SUBDIVISION AREA:
III. AREA III, VALLEY VIEW SUBDIVISION AREA:
I will expect both reports to contain all of the relevant facts
you can gather and your recommendations in terms of your program
activities.
Bud
; I
•;
; •
;
• ;
• ;
; I
I I
;
44
March 25,1993
TO: BUD SCHMIDT, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: BILL KEATING, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: RIO VISTA AREA 1 ANNEXATION
Bud,
McCALL PLANNING r ZONING
EXHIBIT —3
RECEIVED
Rio Vista subdivision is located in Valley County. Its borders include
the north fork of the payette river to the north and east. Boydston street
-on the west, and runs south to the area of the McCall waste water treatment
plant. The year round.residents for the most part work in McCall,and refer
to McCall as their home. This area is served by water and sewer generally
from the City of McCall. The Payette Lakes water and Sewer District serve a
very small majority of sewer service, this is limited to 20 lots in the
Industrial loop. Presently the roads are maintained by the valley county
road dept.
I will try to identify what I know about this area and resort any
special needs or requirements to bring it up to city standards. Also to
identify any problems my staff may run into while trying to maintain the
water, sewer and streets as city property.
WATER:
Most of the area of Rib Vista are served by city water. Some of the out
lying areas including the Industrial Loop and Boydstun street area south of
Pinedale are not served by city water. Neither are the 5 acre parcels in the
Rio Vista Blvd area south of Ernesto drive.
Rio Vista Subdivision # 1 includes a small area along the North Fork of
the Payette river. This area includes Chula road and Cammy drive. There is
no city sewer service available in this area, dwellings in place now are
served by private septic tanks. Some lots however are served by city water.
The area of Cammy drive is the area where the 4" CIP water line crosses the
Payette river into the Rio Vista area.
This water line originates from the area,of Mather and Cross roads from
an 8" CIP line running down mather.The only other line to fill this network
is the 6" CIP coming from Shore Lodge # 6-A pump station. Toothman-Orton
engineers will agree another large trunk line should be built across the
river to serve this area. 12" or 14"?
Chula Drive residents are served by a 2" galvanized water line that dead
ends. Cammy Drive from Rio Vista Blvd is served by the 4" CIP line crossing
the river and up the hill. From the beginning of lot # 22 down to the end of
Cammy drive a 2" galvanized water line is in place. Lots # 38, # 39 and
possibly lot # 35 have no water service at this time.
Rio Vista # 2 is served by both city water and sewer. I don't believe
the empty lots have water and sewer stubs in place. As the requests for
water service come in we have to dig out to the main line and tap it.
Rio Vista 4 3 is located in the area of Memo Circle. For the most part
this area is not served by city sewer. The nearest manhole is located in the
area of Ce Ce. Way and Rio Vista Blvd. The property owners on Memo Circle
have ,been trying for a couple of years to construct a private lift station
with a private pressure line built along Rio Vista Blvd to M.H.# R-3. Most
but not all the lots in Rio Vista # 3 are stubbed with city water.
Memo Circle is a steep private road. Unimproved, not built to city
specs and will will remain private and not maintained or plowed by the city.
Rio Vista 4 4 includes Ce Ce Way, Gabi Lane and the area directly east
by the Waste Water Treatment Plant. The 6" CIP water line runs south from
the area of Boydstun and Pinedale, down the entire length of Ernesto Drive
and Rio Vista Blvd to the 6x6x4 tee. This is the water loop that circles and
serves the entire Rio Vista area.
Rio Vista # 4 should have a meter loop in place at each lot. Ce Ce Way
is served by a undersized 2" galvanized line that will soon need to be
replaced. Lots numbers'10, 11 and 12 all share a single 4" sewer line to.
M.H.# 16 this shared line has blockage problems in the past. Some but not
all the lots have sewer stubs to the property. These lines would have to be
verified and installed before the roads could be paved.
Rio Vista # 5 includes the area of Gena Way, Ernesto Drive and Pinedale.
Again -this area is served well with city water and sewer. Most but not all
the lots are stubbed with water and sewer. Pine dale Road needs to be built
up with a solid base before paving should be attempted.
The 4" CIP line running down Rio Vista Blvd is not large enough to
provide acceptable fire flows. At peak irrigation periods we experience
complaints of low flows and water pressure. During peak irrigation periods
we do not have adequate fire hydrant flows. A lot of areas in town in the
winter we don't have these kind of flows'.
Lets take a look at for example the areas served by the city now and
proposed subdivisions and development the city has taken in the .last 12
months. Presently we have a network of 1389 homes in the.city limits with
city services now. Add 125 homes with city service in Rio Vista. •
TOTAL:= 1514 To this add: 32 lots Payette Lakes Industrial Park
61 lots Mobile Home Park
257 lots Woodlands Subdivision
126 lots Carico Subdivision
650 lots Spring Mtn. Ranch
? Possible building sites in Riverside Sub.
TOTAL: 1126 PLUS possible new hookups
The system is'inadequate now. Until the time we get these lines
upgraded we are adding to an existing problem. We are under an EPA mandate
to begin filtration of our drinking water. Two other worrys that I have are
3
how do we pay for these improvements?
1. The Governor is talking about reintroducing the 1%
2. Bond Elections: I have heard of at least three possible elections now
(A) McCall Water system.
(b) Valley County wants to build a new 100 bed jail with ambulance barn in
McCall.
(c) School district will keep trying until they get a new High School.
We support the tourist industry,'they drive down our roads. Use our
parks, leave the garbage in our dumpsters. The residents are paying the
tourists share. The Bed and Boose Tax paved a lot of city streets a few
years ago.
I will leave these worrys to you and the council.
Chula Drive, Cammy Drive , Memo Circle and CeCe way all are served by 2"
galvanized lines that need to be capsized before we can extend these lines to
provide future hookups. At present we have to refuse the service.
STREETS:
There are aprox 4.47 miles of road in Rio Vista. For the most part the
streets have at least a 60' right of way and most places 70'. The only paved
road is Rio Vista Blvd. That leaves aprox. 2.3 miles graveled.
These graveled roads will need to be graded at least 10 times a year, 3
or 4 times just don't cut it because we get too many complaints. Graveled
roads should be treated annually with dust ebatement oil.
Why hasn't Ernesto Drive and Carmen been paved? I believe this•was
built after' the county, adopted their subdivision ordinance. The roads should
be paved or money set aside to pave.
Chula Road, Cammy Drive and Memo Circle are cul de sac dead end roads.
They are not built to city specs and will not be maintained by the city.
Valley County road department does not plow these roads at the present.
The road leading to the Waste Water Treatment Plant from Industrial Loop
may not be in the right spot. It may have to be moved or an easement
obtained to keep it where it is.
The proposed DeinhardBoydstun Connector is needed to provide another
route into the Rio Vista area for fire trucks and other service vehicles.
SEWER:
The Area of Rio Vista is served well by city sewer. A few of the 5 acre
undeveloped lots don't have sewer available. The areas of the Payette River,
Cammy Drive, Chula Road and Memo Circle have either septic tanks at present
or are trying to build private lift stations to pump to the city sanitary
sewer. Again the ownership of these small lift stations should remain
private and not taken over by the city.
The Payette Lakes Water and Sewer District share the city's 21" concrete
sewer line at Interseptor-A. The Sewer District has an 8" pressure line run
4
down Boydstun street from their lift station #24 on Whipkey lane. This is a
pressure line to about the area of Viking Village. From there it is gravity
down Boydstun to Rio Vista Blvd to M.H. MO-3 shared with the city on to the
Interseptor-a line. This is the line to the Parshall Flume structure.
The District maintains a sewer lift station along the river by the
McCall 9-A pump station. The district and the city share a back-up
generator at this site. This District line is Interseptor B-phase 1 comes
from the area of the McCall airport.
In the future we may be asked to eliminate these septic tanks along the
Payette River.
The city maintains four lift stations in Rio Vista #9, #9-A, #8 and #7
Three of these stations have automatic auxiliary backup generators.
SUMMARY:
If Rio Vista is annexed into the city the LID process could be used to
fix up and pave the existing gravel roads in the subdivision.
Before we do this we should be sure all buildable lots have both water
and sewer stubbed to the corners. The 2" galvanized lines need to be
replaced with lines large enough to provide fire flows and water service to
each property.
Annexation won't effect the way we serve the area now but it will
require us to maintain the streets. This added road will require a new route
for snow plowing and summer maintenance. This includes grading the roads,
patching pot holes, crack sealing and dealing with drainage problems as they
occur.
The city presently has 8 snowplow routes. The three loaders 920, 930
and .966 clear the downtown area and push the snow up hill to the storage area
behind City Hall. We divide the City into three sections and alternate each
storm. The Ford L-8000, 12-F patrol and the 140-G patrol each take a route.
The 1600 Plow/sand truck plows the center line and sands the school bus
route. The GMC with the Frink Blade plows the Airport. Usually the 1600
goes to the Airport to help him. When the loaders are done downtown they
plow the City Shop, hospital, recycling center and parking lot for the Golf
course clubhouse. We clear the sledding area in the area of the smoke -
jumpers, snowmobile parking lots, all city parks, Senior citizens center.
Neal street, 2ND street, Browns Circle and dead end roads. When the scoops
are done they clean around the pump stations and push back intersections.
To add any more area to our plow route will require the purchase of a
new truck set up with a dump bed and snowplow. Todays dollars some where
around $75000. And hire a man full-time to drive the truck.
• Also I would like you to take into consideration the purchase of a
Balderson Dozer Blade for our 966 loader. This is a 30 degree hydraulic
angle blade. The same type Valley County road department uses to plow the
steep and hard to manage areas. We could use this to quickly clean dead ends
5
turnarounds and around fire hydrants. Push back and scrape intersections and
clean the steep roads to our lift stations, (9-A).
My idea is when the 966 is done cleaning up town go back to the shop,
with the quick coupling drop the snow bucket, hook up the blade go out clean
the intersections, turn-arounds and fire hydrants. These hydrants never seem
to get done until the last minute and we have a terrible liability here. We
need to make this a part of our route. The price of the blade, hydraulic
lines and weld on the quik couplers aprox. $22000.
This year we used two patrols to keep the snow winged back, the ice cut
off and the roads wide and passable. There was talk earlier of selling the
old 1972 12-F patrol. I think you should be thinking in terms of how to
replace the 12-F with a new patrol. Don't sell it. Replace it!
These routes take for a light snow storm 6 hours. We still need time
for fueling maintenance and'repairs.
One of our loaders, the 1967 Cat 920 has over 15000 hours on it. It is
worn out and needs to be replaced. I know these are the same stories you
hear over and over again. The 1600 is 16 years old and has been fitted with
a new motor. It still has the same problems the rest of the truck is worn
out.
I think that 15 years should be a reasonable service life goal for a
dump/plow truck. The Ford L-8000 is a 1984 model.
I hope this report is of some help to you. If you have any questions
please don't hesitate to ask.
Thank Yo
u;
4
Bill Yeatin
cc Bud
Mayor
file
CARICO SUB
Chipmunk 2930' gravel
Evergreen 2930' gravel
Strawberry 2930' gravel
Flynn 2779' gravel
Pilgrim Cove 1340' to Mile Standish Rd
Carico Rd. 446' paved
872' gravel
295- unimproved
RIO VISTA
Ernesto Dr. 2920' gravel
Gena Way 652' gravel
Rio Vista Blvd(2.168 miles) 11452' paved
Carmen Dr. 1275' gravel
Chula Dr. 840' gravel
Cammy Dr. 1154' gravel
Memo Circle 350'-unimproved
Cece Way 1232' gravel
Gaby Lane 710' gravel
Lagoon Entrance 324' gravel
Industrial Loop 654' gravel
From Rio Vista to Sewer Lagoon 2089' gravel
West Valley Road 1337' gravel
Wisdom Road 1301' gravel
Blue Jay Drive 955' gravel
Chad Dr from Wisdom 5451' gravel
"Coy Rd • 2685' gravel
Pine Terrace Dr 1536' gravel
Valley View Lane 2100' gravel
Ridge Rd 2904' gravel
Chris Lane 555' gravel
Valley Rim Rd 3335' gravel
o07- -0/
-a°
O) ZS
47:7L
o /
/,
sir
c)cp-R
- \(-)1 ems')\ Qk
09e p
a paU Q pan
09)
1
00') �-��_ emu►
�J2
February 18, 1993
TO: Public Works Director
Police Chief
Fire Chief
Recreation Director
City Attorney
City Treasurer
Librarian
FROM; City Administrator
RE: TECHNICAL REVIEW, RIO VISTA ANNEXATION
On March 4, we will have a technical review of the attached
annexation proposal at 2:30 p.m. Your attendance is mandatory. I
want to provide some direction to you in completing your report
on this matter, so do not prepare your assessment of impact until
after the meeting. Thanks.
Bud7%
McCALL PLANNING & ZONING
EXHIBIT c
RECEIVED
DATE: 2/10/93
TO: MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL
FROM: MAYOR SMITH
RE: ANNEXATION IN RIO VISTA AREA
The question of annexation of areas commonly referred to as the
Rio Vista Area has been repeatedly raised and it appears to be
appropriate for the Council to consider the matter at this time.
The area presented in the attached map is logically annexable and
can be considered in three parts.
Area 1
This area has bee largely developed and water and sewer service
are now maintained by the City. The following issues are
relevant to consideration for annexation of this area:
I. HISTORICAL .CONSIDERATIONS:
In the original development of the subdivisions, every
expectation existed that the Rio Vista area would
eventually become a part of the city. Now that the area is
largely developed, it is timely to consider the inclusion
of the area in our tax base and service area.
II. POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The area is a logical and psychological part of the city
of McCall. Those who live in this area think of themselves
and represent themselves outside of the area as being from
McCall. An implication of keeping the area outside of the
city limits is to preclude persons there from serving in
elected offices of city government. Many of our past
and present advisory committee members live in the area.
III. TAX ISSUES:
The people living in this area enjoy all of the benefits of
being a part of the city, but escape paying city taxes on their
property. The city provides water and sewer service and these
properties pay utility fees, which do not support the general
government activities which add value and benefit to those
properties. The assessed value of the area for 1992 is
**CALL PLANNING & ZONING
EXHIBIT
RECEIVED ®_
$13,162,690. (homeowners exemption has been deleted). The
estimated tax revenue which the city would derive from annexatio
of this area is estimated (at current rates) $58,047. (excludin
debt service)
IV. LAW ENFORCEMENT ISSUES:
The primary benefit to the residents is the improved law
enforcement response which the city could provide. The response
time of the Valley County Sheriff can be an hour or more. The
City Police response would normally be from 7 to 10 minutes.
Further, the city's alternate day sprinkling ordinance is
largely unenforceable in this area, in spite of other utility
customers within the city being bound by it. This action would
work to bring the entire utility system within the corporate
boundaries permitting fair enforcement of city ordinances relate
to the utilities.
V. FIRE ISSUES:
The Rural Fire District now serves the area. There would be
little effect in the response time for the City to serve this
area. The District will lose taxing authority and an agreement
will need to be drafted which addresses this issue.
VI.STREETS:
This annexation will add approximately 5 miles of roads to
the city's street inventory. Of these, 1 3/4 miles are gravel
and 3 1/4 miles are paved. This estimate includes the streets
within the subdivision and a portion of Boydstun St. along the
West boundary of the subdivision. Valley County has volunteere
to extend their snow plowing services into the subdivision for
one year after annexation, to address the delay in receiving tax
revenues from the property. We would expect an agreement will
be needed on this issue.
Area 2
This area has not been developed to a great extent but is being
subdivided and will be in the developing process in the
immediate future. The same considerations and issues as stated
for area 1 will, in time, also apply here.
More importantly it is important to enable the City to more
directly manage the growth in this area consistent with its
planning objectives free from some of the limitations of the
County's jurisdiction.
The likely construction of a roadway and bridge to complete the
Deinhard-Boydstun Connector in the immediate future through this
area is a city driven responsibility. The question of right of
way acquisition, zoning, and other matters need City direction.
Also this area will benefit greatly from that improvement
securing a second access across the river, quic$er response
times, and energy savings for transportation. The costs of
this improvement should be shared by the residents of this area.
Importantly, both present and future neighborhoods in this area
will require water and street improvements. The LID process can
address these issues only if located in the City.
Area 3
This area is principally the Valley View Subdivision which is
under development and represents a growing and major portion of
the southwestern part of the greater McCall area. The
completion of Deinhard-Boydstun Connector will not only spur the
build -out of this area but will greatly increase the assessed
value of the property in this area. Annexation of this area at
this time will give the City needed control over this growth
which in time will become an important part of the total area.
* * * * * * * * * * *
ACTION REQUIRED:
At this time a motion by the Council is required to start
the process for consideration of the areas it wishes to
include in this proposed annexation and to refer the matter to
the City Planning and Zoning Commission for their recommendation
on the merits of annexation of the area and on the zoning for
such area. Their action will include a public hearing on the
matter and further study of the impacts resulting from this
proposal. Their findings and recommendation will be submitted
to the Council for further public hearings and final decision on
the matter.