Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutM 1926-02-10 - CC~~~ Add©urned Regular Meeting ebb l0 1926 ~~ - The Board of Trustees of the Citq of Lynwood met in adjourned regular session at the City Hall 205 Nest Mulford Ave Nednesday Feb 10 1926 at 7:30 prn Present: Trustees Tweedy Roberts Gordy Murray Greenarnyer Absent: None City Attorney,_gigineer and Clerk present President Greenam~er in the Chair The minutes of the meeting of ~'eb 3 1926 were read and approved. Nrit Coms An application was read Prom H N Richardson asking for a fob as Park foreman, this was referred to the Street Commissioner """~" A communication was read from N A Souders asking the intention of the Board relative to the condemnation of the N 40 ft of Lot 600 Treat 2551 for street purposes. This was referred to the Clerk for replq.with instructions to state that the matter would be investigated by the Board as soon as possible Nsw Bus A new ©rdinance entitled: "An Ordinance of the Board of Trus- tees of the City of Lynwood, Cal., regulating plursbing, cesspools, and gas and water installations in the City of Lynwood; providing far plumb- ing permits and inspections, and fixing the fees therefor; rapealing Part II of Ordinance No ?, and all other Ordinances or parts of Ordinan- ces in conflict herewith; and providing penalties for the violation here- ®f," was read. A motion by Trustee Murray seconded by Trustee Roberts that said Ordinance be declared read for the first time and laid over for second reading, was carried by the following vote: Ayes: Trustees Tweedy Roberts Gordy Murray Greenamyer Noes: None Absent: None A new Ordinance entitled "An Ordinance of the Board of Trus- tees of the City of Lynwood, California, annulling Ordinances Nos 53 and 54," was read. A motion by Trustee Gordy seconded by Trustee Murray that said Ordinance be declared read for the t3xst time and laid over for sec- ond reading, was carried by the following vote: Ayes: Trustees Tweedy Roberts Gordy Murray Greenamyer Noes: None Absent: Nona Trustee Roberts spoke regarding the installation of sewers in '~ the rear of the property instead of in the streets. The City E~ginaer explained that he had investigated that matter fullq, that no easements existed on the rear of the property, that condamnatlon for quit Claim deeds would be necessary, that owing to the irregularitq of the rear lcat lines and the fact that machine excavation could not be done that the cost would be considerable hiq_her. He further stated that he would sub- mit to the Board a map showing the proposed installation, and figures covering the estimated cost of installing sewers in the streets, park- ways or in the rear. President Greenamger asked the City Attorney regarding the length of time before action could be had under the "Mattoon Act." The City Attorney stated that immediate cation was possible under said Act as soon as the Act had been pronounced constitutional by the Supreme C~rurt . The City Attorney reporting on the matter of the pr®ceedings taken for the installation of a Lighting System on Long Beach Blvd, stated that he had had several conferences with the City Engineer and had gone into the matter thoroughly, that he had examined the file pur- ported to contain all matters 3n connection with said improvement, also work done under contract awarded. He further stated that the proQeed- ings taken in this matter by the old Board reeked with fraud, and ~6~~t`~. ~.?~~ ~ran?I~i~,~fi_ata~iv~~t#oh'.that said proceedings could be nullified, and asked that the Board authorize him to take whatever action necessary to set aside the proceedings. heretofore taken in connection with the Long Beach Blvd lighting system. He stated that under the law there could ba no Court costs, that no extra legal assistance would be needed, that n® further compensation other than the regular salary of City Attorney xould b e charged. A Motion b9 Trustee Tweedy seconded by Trustee Murray that the City Attorney be authorized to take such legal, or otherwise, action nec- essary and appropriate in the matter 0f abandoning and annulling procaed- ings heretofore taken under Resolution of Intention No 265, was carried by the following vote : Axes: Trustees Tweedy Roberta Murray Greenamver Noes: Trustee Gordy Absent: None r ~2~~ A motion by Trustee Gordy that it be asked that the statement of the City Attorney regarding no expense to the City in connection with the foregoing matter be submitted in writing, receiving no second was declared lost. The City Attorney stated that he had prepared an Ordinance cover ing the distribution throughout the City of handbills, etc., and would submit the same t® the Board Thursday Feb 11, if the Board would adjourn to that date. Damands. The following demands. were audited: ,: :,, General Fund No 1563 64 65 66 67 68 69 Lucille Marcus J E Eggleston L Bouteiller Hugh Clark Edison Co Neuner Corporation So Cal Blue Print Cm St Imp Fund No 4?9 6 H Rowley V~ater Fund No 641 Edison Co ?3 G H Rowley ?4 H S Crocker Co Stan work ~ 2.50 Salary Fireman 3 days 5.00 " Janitor " 3.001 " Traf OEf icer 3 days 1? .50 .Lights 28.92j Bonds (Burton Ave) 56.50' Maps 6.64x. .122.02 Salary St Supt 3 days 2.50• Power and light ~1?2.?6 Salary dater Supt 3 days 15.00` Office supplies 5.66 ~" 193.44 A motion by Trustee Tweedy seconded by Trustee Roberts that the above demands be allowed and warrants ord®red drawn fer same, was carried by the following vote: Ayes: Trustees Tweedy Roberte Gordy Murray Greenamyer Nines; None Absent: None On motion Board adjourned to meet y 11 192fi, at ~~30 pm at the usual plate .. i!(i~~,,,./ Attest: Clerk. - -per-- -- -- -gym- - Preaident Board Lynwood. Trustees Cites