HomeMy Public PortalAboutMinutes - 1965/08/10 - RegularPLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
August 10, 1965
1. A regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Temple
City was held in the City Hall, 5938 Kauffman Avenue, Temple City.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Johnston at 7:30 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was
led by Chairman Johnston.
1::
1
1
ROLL CALL: Present:
Absent:
Also Present:
Commissioners: Beckley, Clemson,
Johnston
Commissioners: Briggs, Garvin
Ray Cushman, Robert Flandrick
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: A motion was made by Commissioner Beckley
that the minutes of July 13, 1965, be approved upon checking the
tape regarding the one year time extension for Paul and Virginia
Uhl, 5050 Sereno Drive, Temple City. Motion seconded by Comm-
issioner Clemson and carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Clemson, Johnston
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: Briggs, Garvin
5. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE VARIANCE CASE NO. 65-162
Lucille A. Howe, Owner
10553 Olive Street
Temple City, California
Chairman Johnston announced that now was the time and place for
the public hearing. Verification of public notice was given by
the Secretary. Planning Director Cushman presented the original
application. The Chairman ordered same marked Exhibit "A" and
made a part of the record. The Planning Director then orally
presented factual data pertaining to the case and his written
report, substantially as given orally, was received in evidence
by Chairman Johnston, marked Exhibit "B ". The maps placed for
public and Planning Commission view were ordered marked Exhibit
"C" and received in evidence. The Exhibits were then viewed by
the Commission.
Appearing in favor: Mr. R.L. Bacon, Attorney representing Mrs.
Lucille Howe, owner-applicant, stated that this request is
consistent with the area surrounding and would not be detrimental
to the area.
No one appeared in opposition.
After hearing all those desiring to speak a motion was made by
Commissioner Clemson that the public hearing be closed. Motion
seconded by Commissioner Beckley and carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Clemson, Johnston
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: Briggs, Garvin
Discussion was held among the Commissioners regarding the 10.5
foot access to interior parcel instead of the required 12. It
was noted an additional one foot setback is shown between prop-
osed drive and existing house.
A motion was made by Commissioner Beckley that we instruct the
City Attorney to draw a resolution granting this request based on
the information presented being in conformity to the surrounding
area as shown on plot plan Exhibit "A" and that the driveway -
width is alright to be only 6" off from the required width.
Motion seconded by Commissioner Clemson and carried by the follow-
ing roll call vote:
Planning Commission Minutes
Page Two August 10, 1965
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Clemson, Johnston
HOES: Commissioners: None
ABSEAT: Commissioners: Briggs, Garvin
Assistant City Attorney Flandrick reviewed the conditions and
presented the proposed resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 65- 166PC: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY GRANTING A
VARIANCE I N ZONE VARIANCE CASE MO. 65-
162.
Title to Resolution No. 65 -168PC was read by Assistant City
Attorney Flandrick.
A motion was made by Commissioner Clemson to waive further read-
ing and adopt. Motion seconded by Commissioner Beckley and carr-
ied by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Clemson, Johnston
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: Briggs, Garvin
6. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE VARIANCE CASE NO. 65 -163
Maranatha High School
P. O. Box 6
Temple City, California
Chairman Johnston announced that now was the time and place for
the public hearing. Verification of public notice was given by
the Secretary. Planning Director Cushman presented the original
application. The Chairman ordered same marked Exhibit "A" and
made a part of the record. The Planning Director then orally
presented factual data pertaining to the case and his written
report, substantially as given orally, was received in evidence
by Chairman Johnston, marked Exhibit "B ". The maps placed for
public and Planning Commission view were ordered Exhibit "C"
and received in evidence. The Exhibits were then viewed by the
Commission.
Discussion was held among the Commissioners regarding the import-
ance of this variance and being that two of the Planning Comm -
issioners were not in attendance,due to being on vacation,if the
variance should be heard at this meeting, held over to the next
regular meeting or hold a special meeting to hear only this re-
quest. Chairman Johnston asked members of the audience what their
opinion would be. At this time a few members of the audience
stepped forward to the mike and gave their opinions as follows:
Mr. John R. Gallagher, 9558 Wedgewood, Temple City. Mr. Gallagher
was in favor of the Commissioners hearing the request at this
meeting. Mr. Maurice Benson, 9542 Wedgewood, Temple City also was
in favor of the Commissioners hearing the request at this meeting.
Mr. Ken Rucker, 9541 Blackley, Temple City also requested the
Commissioners to hear the request at this meeting. Mr. A.B. Grove,
1 West Moreland Place, Pasadena, Chairman of the Board of Dir-
ectors for the High .school, asked if this meeting would possibly
be completed tonight or if it would be continued at another meet-
ing. Chairman Johnston stated that there would actually be no
way of telling.
At this time Chairman Johnston asked the members of the audience
to give their opinion by raising their hands if they preferred
to hold the meeting tonight or schedule it for another time.
The majority of the audience raised their hands to indicate .
they preferred hearing the case at this meeting. Chairman John-
ston opened the public hearing.
Planning Commission Minutes
Page Three August 10, 1965
Appearing in favor: Mr. Ken Rucker, 9541 Slackley, Temple City,
Member of the Temple City Brethren Church and also on the Board
clarified the question on the wall and stated that there is a
wall now existing on the west side of the property and upon
completion of the Condominium, there will be a 6 ft. block wall
on the south side of the property.
R. D. Oliver, School Principal, 5603 Earle Street, San Gabriel.
Mr. Oliver stated that the proposal is a Christian High School
and that at this time there is no other Christian High School
in the San Gabriel Valley area; they will offer college prepara-
tory classes; the facilities are adequate for their needs; is
a non-profit organization; they plan to lease other facilities
in the area for their athlctic programs; the greater factor of
noise would come from the outdoor activities which they do not
intend to have at the location; the maximum enrollment would be
75 students, 9-11 grades with the possibility of a 12th grade
next year; some of the students would be driving to school, but
not enough to raise a traffic problem; buses will be provided
for transportation to and from school; there will be one teacher
for every 10 students; music program would consist of a choir
which would practice in the church sanctuary. The students
enrolled in the school will be carefully screened and will not
be of the disciplinary type student.
Commissioner Clemson asked Mr. Oliver if it is firm that the
athletic program will be held elsewhere. Mr. Oliver stated
they would, but was not sure just where. Commissioner Clemson
also asked of the potential noise during the day for the ath-
letic program. Mr. Oliver stated that the last period of the
school day would be at 2:30. Mr. Oliver also felt that the
proposed parking would be sufficient for their needs and that
15 additional parking spaces will be available next year when
the school expands to a 12th grade.
Charles J. Aguilan, La Rosa Drive, Temple City, Member of the
Church Board. He stated that he now works for the Alhambra
School District and he feels there is a need for more Christian
Churches in this area; it would be a vital factor for the City
to have a Christian High School and it will improve the class
of children and is very much in favor of this school being
started.
Maurice Benson, 9542 Wedgewood, Temple City. Mr. Benson stated
that the back yard of his property joins the Church back year.
He feels the school would not bring down the land value because
of this being a very desirable area and there are many people
that feel the school is an asset and it would be a privilege
to live in such an area; noise factor would not be any major
consideration and the Brethren Church as it exists now, has had
picnics and in their home they cannot hear the noise.
A.B. Grove, 1 West Moreland Place, Pasadena, stated that the
cause of this variance is because of the property not being
enough acreage and this is the reason it is before the Planning
Commission. John Hill, 9416 0lema Street, Temple City. Mr.
Hill stated that he is a Member of the Board•of Maranatha High
School and that one of the primary reasons is that by the ord-
inance for the requi•redarea for a high school it would be
unfair to the owner of the property on the basis of the proport-
ionate use of the property in conjunction with the proposed
school and that proportionately the area is large enough for
the amount of students they are going to enroll.
Commissioner Clemson asked for clarification of several items
by Mr. Oliver those being; the school hours which will be 9-4,
classes 55 minutes in length, 30 minutes for lunch at which
time the students will be outside in the lunch pavilion.
Planning Commission Minutes
Page Four August 10, 1965
Appearing in favor: Mr-s. Laura Benson, 9542 Wedgewood, Temple
City. Mrs. Benson stated that the lunch area is right in back
of their yard and she is in favor of granting this variance.
After hearing a l l those desiring to speak in favor of this var-
iance, Chairman Johnston asked if there was anyone appearing
in opposition to this variance.
Appearing in opposition: Mr. John R. Gallagher, 9558 Wedgewood,
Temple City. Mr. Gallagher stated that his property borders on
the north of the church and proposed school. Mr. Gallagher
read for the record, that Mr. and Mrs. W i 1 i nson of 9546 Wedge-
wood, Temple City, were also in opposition and submitted a
letter to the Planning Commissioners, He also stated that he
anticipates there . be school participation in the evening by
the music department; that noise is definitely a factor, esp-
ecially in the evenings and on weekends; this will be detrimental
to his property value and is strongly opposed to granting this
variance. Mr. Gallagher also referred to news items and a
brochure obtaining information on the proposed school.
Nr. D.T. Meza, Jr.,5603 Temple City Boulevard, Temple City,
stated that his property is next door and there will not be
sufficient parking in the area for the school because there is
not actually sufficient parking for the Church on Sunday and he
is vary much opposed to granting this variance. Mr. Thomas
Erling, 9567 Wedgewood, Temple City, stated that he is opposed
to this variance and believes there will be a lot of noise from
it. Mr. Donald Zimmer, 9552 Wedgewood, Temple City, stated his
property borders on the south and east of the proposed site;
he has no objection to the possibility of noise, but feels that
his property value will go down.
hr. James E. Law, 9521 Wedgewood, Temple City, stated that there
is not sufficient room now for the school and the parking will
also be a problem. Mr. Victor T. Rochford, 9566 Wedgewood,
Temple City, stated that he believes his property value will go
down and feels the acreage is not sufficient for the school.
Mrs. Ole Anderson, 5611 Temple City Boulevard, Temple City,
stated that she believes there will be a traffic problem and
does not feel that the bus transportation will be sufficient.
Mr. Cataldo J. Lomonico, 9533 Wedgewood Street, Temple City,
stated that there will be noise in the area and that a, portion
of the students attending the school are not residents of Temple
City.
After hearing all those desiring to speak in opposition of this
variance, Chairman Johnston asked if the Applicant would like to
speak in rebuttal.
Speaking in rebuttal: Mr. R.D. Oliver, School Principal, stated
that the publicity they had received on school was not to in-
fluence the Planning Commission's decision is any way; that the
emphasis will be placed on using the buildings in the daylight
hours; the auditorium will be used only one night of the month
for a PTA -type meeting; no evening activities have been planned;
there will be no dances of any kind; if a chemistry course is
offered next year they intend to see that there is absolutely
no fire danger to the school or the area; there are 13 parking
spaces available for 7 teachers; they want to be part of the
community and liked and welcome any conditions the Planning
Commission would like to incur. Mr. Oliver also stated that the
parking would be controlled by the issuing of a parking permit
to the students whom they feel need to drive to school; the
remainder of the students will be transported by buses; no band
drilling or band music will be held on the school grounds and
increased parking facilities are anticipated by the Church in
the future.
Planning Commission Minutes
Page Five August 10, 1965
After hearing all those desiring to speak a motion was made by
Commissioner Clemson that the public hearing be closed. Motion
seconded by Commissioner Beckley and carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Clemson, Johnston
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: Briggs, Garvin
Planning Director Cushman stated that the parking requirements
for schools is one parking space for every 10 students plus
one for each employee and teacher. The Commission then viewed
Exhibit "A" maps.
Commissioner Beckley stated that he would like to lean as far
as possible to grant this variance for the following reasons:
that when you establish a school you therefore need 15 acres,
but by the same token we do have variances granted with stip-
ulations when it is something special and when you grant a
variance you are granting it under certain requirements like a
privilege; when you establish a normal school it has 15 acres
and they do what they wish as long as they meet the various
requirements required by the ordinance and under these conditions
Commissioner Beckley stated that we could make stipulations
with reference to parking restrictions and various other res-
trictions that would apply to a normal high school, no evening
meetings, etc. Commissioner Beckley also stated that he does
not feel it would harm the neighbors as much as they believe
and is in favor of a church high school where one can be con-
ducted; this is an ideal location as far as traffic is concerned
because of Temple City Boulevard being an 8 foot wide street,
with minimum traffic at this time.
Commissioner Clemson stated that Mr. Beckley's summation was
also his feelings, but that he is completely aware of the
peoples concern and that the Commission does have a moral resp-
onsibility to try to disregard their own personal feelings and
do as they feel is for the betterment of Temple City.
Chairman Johnston stated that he is concerned about the fact
that this school micht be more than an average success and in
the future will neea other variances and also that if all the
students were going to be from Temple City this position
would be looked at differently.
h motion was made by Commissioner Beckley that the City Att-
orney be instructed to draw a resolution granting this request
with the followine conditions: Development of the subject prop-
erty shall be substantially in accord with the plot plan, Exhibit
"A ", without any additional construction except as herein pro-
vided; that all provisions of Section 401, subparagraph (9)
of Ordinance No. 63 -112 be required except the size of the lot
and specifically a solid masonry wall six (6) feet in height be
erected on any boundary line which is a common property line wit[
";" classified property; that the facility be limited to not
exceed 100 students; that there be no organized outdoor athletic
activity other that calisthenics; that the use be conducted
during daylight hours only, except for and not to exceed one
evening per month that being a PTA -type meeting; that off - street
parking facilities be provided in accordance with the followins
provisions: one off - street parking space for each staff member
and employee of the school facility; one off - street parking
space for each 10 students or fraction thereof; this variance
shall expire and be of no effect unless exercised within a
period of one year from and after the date of adoption of this
resolution. Motion seconded by Commissioner Clemson and carried
by the following roll call vote:
Planning Commission Minutes
Page Six ;';ucus t 10, 1965
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Clemson
TOES: Commissioners: Johnston, due to a personal interest
ABSENT: Commissioners: Briggs, Garvin
At this time Planning Director Cushman reviewed the procedure
of appeal to the City Council on zone variance cases.
Assistant City Attorney Flandrick reviewed the conditions and
presented the proposed resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 65- 159PC: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISS-
ION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY GRANT-
ING A VARIANCE IN NE VARIANCE CASE
NO. 65 -163.
Title to Resolution No. 65 -169 was read by Assistant City Att-
orney Flandrick.
A motion was made by Commissioner Clemson to waive further read-
ing and adopt. Motion seconded by Commissioner Beckley and
carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Clemson
NOES: Commissioners: Johnston, due to a personal interest
ABSENT: Commissioners: Briggs, Garvin
At this time Chairman Johnston convened the meeting for a 5
minute recess at 9 :25 P.M. The meeting was called to order at
9:30 P.M. for further items on the agenda.
7. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE VARIANCE CASE NO. 65 -164
Baldwin Builders, Owner -Appl icant
5525 Temple City Boulevard
Temple City, California
Chairman Johnston announced that now was the time and place for
the public hearing. Verification of public notice was given by
the Secretary. Planning Director Cushman presented the original
application. The Chairman ordered same marked Exhibit "A" and
made a part of the record. The Planning Director then orally
presented factual data pertaining to the case and his written
report, substantially as given orally, was received in evidence
by Chairman Johnston, marked Exhibit "B". The maps placed for
public and Planning Commission view were ordered marked Exhibit
"C" and received in evidence. The Exhibits were then viewed
by the Commission.
Appearing in favor: Mr. James Baldwin,, 5559 Pal Mal, Temple
City, developers and owners of the subject property. Mr.
Baldwin stated that the proposed owners of these homes would
like to have the 3 foot extension instead of the 2 feet, this
area opening off the dining area.
No one appeared in opposition.
After hearing all those desiring to speak a motion was made by
Commissioner Beckley that the public hearing be closed. Motion
seconded by Commissioner Clemson and carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners: Beckley, Clemson, Johnston
Commissioners: None
Commissioners: Briggs, Garvin
A motion was made by Commissioner Beckley that we instruct the
City Attorney to draw a resolution granting this request as
presented per plot plan Exhibit "A ". Motion seconded by Comm-
issioner Clemson and carried by the following roll call vote:
Planning Commission Minutes
Page Seven
AYES: Commissioners:
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
August 10, 1965
Beckley, Clemson
None
Johnston, due to conflict of interest
Briggs, Garvin
Assistant City Attorney Flandrick reviewed the conditions and
presented the proposed resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 65 -1 yOPC: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISS-
ION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY GRANT-
ING A VARIANCE IN ZONE VARIANCE CASE
NO. 65- 164PC.
Title to Resolution No. 65 -170 was read by Assistant City
Attorney Flandrick.
A motion was made by Commissioner Beckley to waive further read-
ing and adopt. Motion seconded by Commissioner Clemson and
carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Clemson
NOES: Commissioners: Hone
ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Johnston, due to conflict of interest
ABSENT: Commissioners: Briggs, Garvin
S. PUBLIC HEARING: AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE
Height of Buildings and Structures
Planning Director Cushman briefly reviewed the reasons for the
public hearing. Chairman Johnston opened the public hearing.
A motion was made by Commissioner Beckley that this item be
continued to the next regular adjourned meeting for further
discussion and study when there is a full commission present.
Motion seconded by Commissioner Clemson and carried by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Clemson, Johnston
nES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: Briggs, Garvin
9. OLD BUSINESS
1. ZONE VARIANCE CASE NO. 65 -160
4841 Persimmon Avenue, Temple City
Planning Director Cushman reviewed the proposals of the new
plot plan, existing garage and shed as shown. A second shed
is to be demolished and is located where proposed garage is
shown. The parcel line has been moved 10 feet to provide equal
area for both parcels, location of porposed house and garage
on Parcel "B" has been changed to provide a 20 foot front yard
facing east as required by the original resolution.
City Attorney Flandrick ruled revised plan substantially in
accord with the original resolution of grant and Commission
could approve revision.
A motion was made by Commissioner Clemson that the revised plot
plan Exhibit "B" be approved. Motion seconded by Commissioner
Beckley and carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Clemson, Johnston
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: Briggs, Garvin
1
Planning Commission Minutes
Page Eight ;=August 10, 1965
2. RESOLUTION N0. 65.1 7 1 PC : RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY RECOMMEND-
ING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE ZON 1NG
REGULATIONS OF SAID CITY, RELATING TO
MOBILE HOMES.
Title to Resolution No. 65 -171PC was read by Assistant City
Attorney Flandrick.
A motion was made by Commissioner Beckley to waive further read -
ing and adopt. Motion seconded by Commissioner Clemson and
carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Clemson, Johnston
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: Briggs, Garvin
RESOLUTION NO. 65 -172PC : RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY RECOMMEND-
ING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING
REGULATIONS OF SAID CITY, RELATING TO
OFF - STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
Title to Resolution No. 65 -172PC was read by Assistant City
Attorney Flandrick.
A motion was made by Commissioner Clemson to waive further read-
ing and adopt. Motion seconded by Commissioner Beckley and carr-
ied by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Clemson, Johnston
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: Briggs, Garvin
10. MATTERS FROM CITY OFFICIALS
1. Commissioner Clemson reported on the West :pan Gabriel Valley
Planning Council Luncheon Meeting held Friday, August 6th.
f. Planning Director Cushman reported that he had received an
invitation from the Los Angeles Regional Transportation
Study - Regional Council of Planning to attend their initial
meeting which was held August 6, 1965, for the City and
County Planners of the 5- county L.A.R.T.S. area. Mr. Cush-
man stated that this will be a technical group for the
purpose of coordinating programs dealing with Transportation
Study.
11. ADJOURNMENT
A motion was made by Commissioner Clemson, seconded by Commiss-
ioner 3eckley that the meeting be adjourned to the next regular
adjourned meeting ,;eotember 13, 1965, at '::00 P.M. Motion
carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 9:50 P.M.
1 ATTEST:
C h a i rma
lanninc; Commission
l