HomeMy Public PortalAboutMinutes - 1965/11/23 - RegularPLANNING. COMMISSION MIELI3TE
CITY OF TEMPLE CITY
;!ovembe r 23, 1965
1. A regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Temple-
City was held in the City Hall, 5938 North ",auffman Avenue, Temple
City. The meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Clemson
at 7 :30 P.M.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was
led by Vice Chairman Clemson,
3. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners: Briggs, Garvin, Clemson
Absent: Commissioners: Beckley, Johnston
Also Present: Ray Cushman, R. Flandrick, K. Koski
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: A motion was made by Commissioner Garvin
that the minutes of the Regular Adjourned Meeting be approved as
written. Motion seconded by Commissioner Clemson and carried by
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
NOES: Commissioners:
ASSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
Clemson, Garvin
None
Beckley, Johnston
Briggs, absent at meeting
A motion was made by Commissioner Garvin that the minutes of the
Regular Meeting of November 9, 1965 be approved as corrected per
page E, paragraph one, in age from 5 -20 with insertion of "upon
admission" and page six paragraph 2 "is unsightly ". Motion
seconded by Commissioner Clemson and carried by the following
roll call vote:
7ES: Commissioners:
n ES : Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
Clemson, Garvin
None
Beckley, Johnston
Briggs, absent at meting
5. PU?LIC HEARING CONTINUED: ZONE VARIANCE CASE '10, 65 -172
Seeman School
Wiza Gertrude Salves (OA)
4941 Halifax Road, Temple City
Site: 4949 Hallowell Avenue
Temple City
Planning Director Cushman reviewed the case briefly for the aud-
ience and the Comm iS.s Voners and pointed out that the plot plan,
Exhibit "A" was in error in one respect, that being the property
line is not the same as the fence line. The applicant has sub -
mitted another plot plan, Exhibit "A" Revised with red pencil
outlini.rg the property line and the green pencil outlining the
fence lime reason being there is 10 feet between the fence on
the north and south setback side; the proposed building location
is 35 feet from the property line on the revised plot plan,
Exhibit "A ". The half street on Halifax Road has been striped
on the revised plot plan also; there is a greater distance shown
between the property line and the proposed building than on the
first plot plan submitted.
Planning Director Cushman also stated that the public hearing
from the previous Regular Meeting had been left open and now
is the time to continue with the testimony.
Vice Chairman Clemson asked if Cornm i s s i one r Br i ggs had listened
to the tape of the previous public hearing and read the minutes
and if he felt he was qualified to hear further testimony and
reach a decision if the Commission felt they could do so. Comm-
issioner Briggs certified that he had listened to the tape and
read the minutes as instructed to do because of his absence at
the previous public hearing and felt he was qualified to judge
fairly and with understanding.
Planning Commission Minutes
Page Two November 23, 1965
Vice Chairman Clemson announced that the public hearing was now
open and asked if the applicant was in attendance or someone that
was qualified to speak for the applicant.
Appearing in favor: Mr. Mike Chamness, 5116 Sleeker, Baldwin
Park. Mr. Chamness is a Teacher at Seeman School and he presentee
to the Commission a statement from Mrs. Wiza ':ertrude Salves
giving Mr. Chamness the authority to address the Planning Comm-
ission on behalf of Seeman School and herself. This fetter is on
file with the case.
Mr. Chamness stated that in 1926, when Seeman School was built
the area was a farming and flower growing region with little if
any buildings in the immediate vicinity of the school. During
the last 15 years the property in the area has been developed to
a residential area with some light manufacturing and dairy ind-
ustry in the vicinity. The school buildings were built prior to
the second World War and are of wooden frame and stucco construc-
tion. Through the years, these buildings have become out - dated
for the care and treatment of retarded children; the dormitory
that is to be replaced has deteriorated and must be replaced by
a newer, better constructed one designed especially for the type
of children who live at the school. At this time there are no
plans to increase the size of the school past the 78 boy limit
and would like, at this time, to have the proposed increase named
in the original petition amended to read for the retention of the
present capacity of 70 boys. Some of the property owners in the
area want the school to relocate elsewhere which apparently means
anywhere other than where we are located at the present time;
they also feel the school is detrimental to the neighborhood and
a constant threat to the safety and well being of the neighbors.
Those who work daily with these children, the neighbors who have
had contact with the boys on different occasions and also the
parents of these boys, all agree that there is no physical danger
whatsoever from any of these retarded children. Mr. Chamness aisr
emphasized that mental retardation is not mental illness. Retard•
ation means a limitation of ability to develop past a particular
point of intelligence; this does not mean that there are any
anti social tendencies; these boys are gentle, docile and obed-
ient and have to be protected and supervised so that they
do not become injured. They also occasionally suffer from the
misunderstandings and ignorance of strangers. As far as Seeman
School is concerned there have been no instances of any of the
neighbors being injured or attacked by any of the boys. It seems
unfair that the boys who now live at the school, most of whom
were born during the past 10 -12 years, must be the ones to suffer
by living in housing no longer suitable; that through no fault
of their own were born with less mental ability than we have and
therefore, must be cared for and even more, given the opportunity
for an education as they are able, a right of all children, not
those selected as normal.
A new building of better construction and design is urgently
needed to replace the building now in use, and because of the
improved design of the proposed building, the children will re-
ceive better care.
It has been strongly suggested that Seeman School be relocated
in another, less populated area so that the neighbors and the
boys themselves would have a larger area to run and play in and
away from the congestion of the City. Relocation at this time
would be financially impractical and impossible. Relocation is
also out of the question because of the desires of supporting
County of Los Angeles and California State Agencies who place the
children close to their parents' houses. This provides an opport-
unity for frequent visits.
Planning Commission Minutes
Page Three November 23, 1965
Seeman School has approximately 10 acres of ground for the boys
to run and play. These children do not possess all the complica-
ted desires and emotions most of us share. What looks desirable
to us is not even seen or realized by these boys. We at Seeman
School believe that the land is most certainly being utilized
efficiently and indeed, for a very worthwhile purpose. Any land
that we occupy could be turned to a profit ,y somebody not con-
cerned with the needs of retarded children. This objection would
be applied no matter where the school was located. Others have
objected to the school's appearance and suggested that improve-
ments are needed. We are most willing to do all we can to uphold
and maintain the standards of our community. If the neighbors
want a wall surrounding our property, we will be happy to discuss
this with those directly concerned. Halifax Road will certainly
be fully dedicated and any other matters on this subject we will
be pleased to discuss at the convenience of our neighbors.
Our present plans call for location at thirty -five feet from the
western property line. This is twenty feet more than the minimum
requirement in Temple City. We are now changing these plans to
read approximately eighty -five feet from our western property
line, so that we may conserve our trees and shrubs. Our present
plans call for the removal of five existing trees, and we have
decided we would rather keep these trees and move the building.
It is the construction of the building we are concerned with, not
with its relative position on the property.
Another objection to the variance has been that of noise. Due to
the construction of the new building, the present problems of
noise, rather than being increased will on the contrary be re-
duced. The proposed building includes not only private rooms,
a medical and dental clinic and a nurses' station as well as
three visiting parlors, but also a large indoor recreation area
that we presently lack at the school. Because of this lack,
many boys now recreate outside who in the future could remain
inside, thus cutting down already existing noise. We also feel
that the noise objection has been exaggerated during the recent
years when we compare our noise potential with that of our neigh-
boring public schools. It also doesn't make sense that for those
who object to present noise to try and halt construction of a
building which will reduce the noise factor itself.
Some of the people in the surrounding area also feel that if the
school were granted this request and the building was constructed
then in 1978 when the Special Permit has to be removed there
would be little chance of their forcing the school from this area.
Even though the school may hazard a loss due to construction that
may only last for 12 years, or the neighborhood takes a chance
that the school will remain because of the construction, it does
seem heartless to require our children to live under present
conditions, when improved, more efficient conditions can be pro -
vided. We at the school believe it is worth whatever possible
loss might accrue in 12 years to be able to provide better con-
structed and planned facilities for our children at this time.
In regards to the parking problem, in 1958 a parking requirement
was placed upon the school to have it meet the needs of contemp-
orary sanataria. How this particular point affects the surround-
ing dwellings is difficult to see, as our employees automobiles
are only visible to the neighbors when traveling the public
streets and none of our boys own or drive cars. Even our driveway
is secluded. We feel that this matter of parking is an internal
problem particular only to the school and that will soon be
remedied both by enlarging the lot as well as paving over the
present gravel surface. It is doubtful that this problem affects
any of the neighbors.
Planning Commission Minutes
Page Four November 23, 1965
Seeman School is working to improve their own particular re-
lationship with the community, and also to increase the fund of
knowledge regarding all retarded children. :e believe that
there will be a severe harpship placed on the boys living at the
school not only in the immediate future, but also for the next
twelve years, if the requested variance al lowi tic; this necessary
construction does not pass. Our concern is to the care and
education of retarded boys and we feel that we should be granted
the permission to do this work in the best possible way, with
the finest facilities we can provide.
Vice Chairman Clemson questioned Mr. Chamness on the definition
of "School." Mr. Chamness stated that this name was applied in
1926 and at the present time would be defined as a "home ". He
also stated that Seeman School is the largest private school;
the parents contact the school directly or the children are placed
through a welfare office; they have children from Orange County,
Northern California and Los Angeles County, with the San Gabriel
Valley area having the most children located at the school; most
of the boys stay at the home continuously.
Vice Chairman Clemson asked what the moral responsibility of the
parents are if there child is retarded. Mr. Chamness stated it
present a definite hardship on the entire family and also the
retarded child because you cannot require the same mentality of
a retarded child to a normal child. If the child is received at
Seeman School at a young age the child is easier to train and
care for; they try to prepare the child to live in a normal
society at a later date. A question was directed to Mr. Chamness
regarding what would happen to the land if the special permit
was not renewed in 1978. Mr. Chamness stated that the property
belongs to Mrs. Salves and he could not answer that question.
Mr. Chamness said the existing building will be demolished when
the proposed building is complete.
Planning Director Cushman clarified the position of the existing
dormitory on the plot plan same dormitory to be demolished when
the new one is complete; that the re- furbishing of the kitchen
facilities has been up graded to today's standards.
Commissioner Briggs asked the Planning Director exactly what the
Special Permit consisted of. Planning Director Cushman stated
that Special Permit Case No. 1323 was approved subject to the
following conditions: that two copies of a revised plot plan be
submitted showing the following conditions. A minimum of 50
parking spaces be provided; the entire area exclusive of the
parking area and that area occupied by the administration build-
ing shall be enclosed with a 6 foot high chain link fence and any
gates provided shall be locked; effective screen planting shall
be provided and maintained around the fenced area; that a strip
of land bordering North Arden Drive be given free of charge to
the County of Los Angeles so that North Arden Drive may be im-
proved consistent with the Master Plan of Highways; that North
Halifax Road, bordering the subject property, shall be improved
in accordance with county standards and dedicated free of charge
to the County of Los Angeles, that on the revised plot plan the
improvements shall be indicated but that no additional children
shall be maintained as pupils on the premises. 3y no additional
children is meant that the number shall remain 73 or less; the
Special Permit shall expire February 1, 19'8.
Mr. Chamness stated that the building is subject to approval of
the County Agencies and can be amended as they see fit. The .
average length of the boys staying at the home is decided by the
parents; the rates are the lowest of any school of this type in
the State; they do not charge private boys more than the boys
from the welfare agencies.
Planning Commission Minutes
Page Five November 23, 1965
Also appearing in favor: Mr. Jack E. Moore, 9622 Las Tunas
Drive, Temple City, Physician for the boys. Dr. Moore stated
that he wou,l•'d be more than willing to answer any questions the
CommissionersA.may have regarding the mental and physical ability
of the boys. 'The boys are docile, they are quiet, only time
they are noisy is when there is some physical problem; they have
the lack of mental ability; the school needs the building to
up data to today's standards; the building will 'De air -conditioned
and sound; proof and he is very much in favor of the Commission
granting this variance.
Commissioner Garvin asked several questions of Dr. Moore regard-
ing the epileptic seizures. Dr. Moore stated that when a boy
does have an epileptic seizure he on occasion will make a little
noise and fall down but that is all there is to it; he also
stated that there are children in public schools who also have
these seizures; the age of the boys at the school is from 6 -45,
but they are considered boys rather than men because of their
mental ability; that on occasion a boy may try to sneak out of
the school but they are always immediately picked up; the reason
for getting out of the school is a form of curiosity, they want
to see something; they never get into trouble and that the
average mental age of the boys in the school is about 9 or 10.
Planning Director Cushman presented a petition with 32 names
and addresses of merchants and businessmen of Temple City, some
of whom are also residents, in favor of the granting of this
variance and is on file with the case.
Homer Shirley, 11728 Lambert, El Monte. Mr. Shirely stated that
he has been at the Christmas Parties at the school and he is
in favor of granting this variance so that the new dormitory can
be built. Mrs. Max Davis, 4929 North Hallowell, Temple City,
lives in the second house on the west side of the street from
the school and has lived there since 1942. Mrs. Davis stated
that there has been no trouble from the boys at the school and
has never regretted living at that location. She also would
like to see the building completed because they do need it very
badly. Mrs. Salves has been very generous to the neighbors on
thai'r street and has no objection whatsoever to the granting of
this variance and no noise factor would be involved. Mrs. Ben
Autry, 4847 North Hallowell, Temple City. k;rs. Autry stated
she has lived at that address for 9 years and there has been no
noise problem and has no objection to the granting of this var-
iance.
Mr. Chamness stated that he had made a spot check of the people
living on Arden, Halifax and Hallowell and the people had ex-
pressed no animosity but rather curiosity. He had also extended
an invitation to these people to see the school on the past
Sunday morning, but no one had shown up to see the facilities.
Also appearing in favor: Mrs. Paul S. Broberg, 4923 Hallowell,
Temple City. Mrs, uroberg stated that they are more aware of
the school because of that street being only way to get into the
school, that they did investigate what type of school it was
when they bought the property and would just as soon continue to
live there by the school in the future.
Robert L. Robbins, 44928 Hallowell, Temple City. Mr. Robbins
stated that he knew what type of school was located there, it is
quiet, scenic, they have lived in the area four years and are
entirely in favor of the Commission granting this variance.
Dick W. Steyer, 5125 Arden Drive, Temple City. Mr. Steyer stated
that after considering both sides of the story he would like to
go on record as being in favor of the variance; there has been
no noise factor to date; the fencing is not first class, but it
does not bother them too much.
Planning Commission Minutes
Page Six November 23, 1965
Mrs. Jo Scheff ing, 483 7 North Hallowell, Temple City. Mrs.
Scheffing stated that she has no objection to the variance being
granted and has lived at that location since 1948. Mr. Dick
Miller, 4924 Hallowell, Temple City; has no objection at all to
the school, and there has been no noise factor involved.
Vice Chairman Clemson asked if the testimony could be limited
subject to any new evidence that might be available, in opposing
the granting of this variance.
Those appearing in opposition: Mr. Heins (Kueferly)? 5034 Arden
Drive, Temple City. He stated that he has lived at the above
location for two years; that noise is the main objection; his
property is right across the street from where the new building
is going to be; the boys have been caught sitting in the trees
and throwing rocks on his house and window screens; has heard
the boys swearing and is not opposed to the school itself, but
the location of the proposed building to be right in front of
his house. He hears noise from the school ni:ht and day. He
doesn't expect the trees to be removed so that the building is
going to be built. rx. Hermanez, 5020 Halifax :load, Temple
City. Pair. Hermanez clarified that the permission of the school
to increase the number of boys from 78 to 100 had been dropped.
Planning Director Cushman stated that is correct, the school
has dropped the request for the number of boys to increase and
they cannot increase the number of boys unless they file a new
zone variance and proper notification is made to the property
owners.
Planning Director Cushman stated that some of the people that
are in the audience tonight have signed a petition and stated
they are indicated by the small red "X" on the vicinity map; the
large red "X" indicates people that have spoken in opposition
to this variance.
Mrs. Frances Gallagher, 5117 North Arden Drive, Temple City. Mrs.
Gallagher stated that she had heard from a reliable source Mrs.
Salvas was ill and is now being treated for cancer and wondered
exactly what would happen to the property if Mrs. Salvas would
pass away in the near future. City Attorney Flandrick stated
that this is not pertinent to the case.
Mr. Victor King, 5018 Arden Drive, Temple City. Mr. King stated
that in the Sunday, ;ovember 21, 1965 Temple City Times the
article says "Mrs. Salvas says her neighbors fear of the re-
tarded children is groundless." Mr. King stated this is not
correct and opposed to the granting of this variance. Mrs.
Roberta Marriott, 5027) Arden Drive, Temple City. Mrs. Marriott
stated that many things regarding this variance request con-
cerns her. One in particular is the boys from the school talk
with the girls that are walking to school alon g Arden Drive on
an easement area; that these boys are aware of the girls; she
wondered why the conditions of the Special Permit case with the
County have not been complied to; that parkin it is a problem in
the area during the day.
Planning Director Cushman stated that there is parking inside
for 15 to 17 cars and when he went by the school during the day
around 2:00 there were ' cars in the lot. Mrs. Marriott stated
that the parking does involve the neighbors and is also con-
cerned with the teachers at the school that do not have teaching
credentials.
Appearing in rebuttal in favor: Mr. Mike Chamness, 5116 Bleeker,
Baldwin Park. Mr. Chamness clarified that °Mrs. Salvas at one
time did have cobau l t treatments.. and that he did know the exact
condition of her health now. The school operates year around
5 days a week; they are in the market for credentialed teachers
but they are very difficult to find; boys being what they are,
are going to climb trees occasionally; and there has been a
flare thrown on the school grounds, bottles and once a gun shot;
the easement will be absorbed into their property on the east
side; the easement on the north will remain the same.
Planning Commission Minutes
Page Seven Novem :; 3 r 23, 1965
The east will be fully dedicated; the western property will
be fully absorbed with a new fence; the new building will be
insulated with a large indoor play area; the outside gate is
always locked at night.
Commissioner Garvin asked Mr. Chamness what the standard time
for the boys being off the glayground was. He replied the boys
are allowed outside from 11 :00 AM - 12 :15 P.M. The teachers
wort; 10 -12 hours a day 6 days a week; they do need competent
people with dedication to their work; in good weather the boys
are sometimes allowed to play outside after dinner until bedtime
at 9 :00 P.M. and this time is strictly enforced.
Mrs. Wiza Gertrude Salvas, owner - applicant came forward and
stated that the story of her health problem Is unfounded and
her cancer has been corrected and she is in fine health.
After hearing all those desiring to speak a motion was made by
Commissioner Garvin that the public hearing be closed. Motion
seconded by Commissioner Briggs and carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Briggs, Clemson, Garvin
NOES: Commissioners: None
A:SENT: Commissioners: Beckley, Johnston
Commissioner Briggs stated that the concern of the Planning
Commission is if the building is needed and if it will be detri-
mental to the property or to the surrounding; community. Comm-
issioner Briggs stated that this building would improve the area
and whether they want to or not the children have no choice but
to live there and he felt that the children are entitled to have
the best facilities possible; the noise will ;De cut down be-
cause of the building being 85 feet from the .property line and
felt this variance should be granted and the children should not
have to live in sub - standard facilities. Vice Chairman Clemson
agreed with Commissioner Briggs and stated that the new building
would help the children. Commissioner Garvin also agreed and
stated that the new building should be approved and this type of
home is certainly needed.
A motion was made by Commissioner Briggs that the variance be
granted based upon the reasons stated and it would not be ad-
verse to the community, it will improve the view to the property
owners, it would be beneficial for the children that are living
there and that the conditions imposed be the following: All
conditions of Special Permit Case No. 1323 of the Regional
Planning Commission be incorporated into this case and specific-
ally including that Halifax Road shall be improved and dedicated
to City standards; that the maximum height limit of the proposed
dormitory be limited to a one -story building; this variance
shall expire and be of no effect unless exercised within a
period of one year from and after the date of adoption of this
Resolution and the applicant shall file, or cause to be filed,
with the City Clerk, a document which the City may record, which
shall acknowledge that the owner of the subject property is
aware of and accepts the conditions set forth in paragraphs (a)
through (d) above, and that the subject property, regardless of
any change in ownership is bound by and subject to the provisions
of this Resolution and the conditions contained herein. Motion
seconded by Commissioner Garvin and carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Briggs, Clemson, Garvin
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSEN!T: Commissioners: Beckley, Johnston
Assistant City Attorney Flandrick reviewed the conditions and
presented the proposed resolution.
Planning Commission Minutes
Page Eight
Ncvember 23, 1965
Chairman Johnston announced that now was the time and place for
the public hearing. Verification of public notice was given by
the Secretary. Planning Dir'ecttor Cushman presented the original
application. The Chairman ordered same marked Exhibit "A" and
made a part of the record. The Planning Director then orally pre-
sented factual data pertaining to the case and his written report
substantially as given orally was received in evidence by the
Chairman, marked Exhibit "B". The maps placed for pu'> 1 i c and
Planning Commission view were ordered marked Exhibit "0" and
received in evidence.
Appearing in favor: Mr. Hulbert R. Stone, 9302 P i tk i n Street,
Rosemead. 1r. Stone stated that he wished the commission would
grant this request.
No one appeared in opposition.
After hearing all those desiring to speak a motion was made by
Commissioner Garvin that the public hearing be closed. Motion
seconded by Commissioner Beckley and carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Briggs, Clemson, Garvin,
Johnston
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
Discussion was held on the Conditional Use Permit, with on -sale
alcoholic beverages within 200 feet of property zoned R -3. The
Commission was in favor of granting this permit.
A motion was made by Commissioner Beckley that the Conditional
Use Permit be granted because under the circumstances of the
particular case, it will not be detrimental to the health, safety,
peace, morals, comfort or general welfare to the persons residing
or working in the neighborhood thereof, nor be detrimental or
injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to
the general welfare of the City. Motion seconded by Commissioner
Clemson and carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Briggs, Clemson, Garvin,
Johnston
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
City Attorney Flandrick reviewed the conditions and presented
the proposed resolution.
RESOLUT I O'! A. 65-186PC: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY G RANT I NG A
C0'UT 10•sAL USE PERMIT NO. 65-1-/6.
Title to Resolution No. 65 -166PC was read by City Attorney
Flandreik.
A motion was made by Comm. ssioner Garvin to waive further rending
and adopt. ;ir; ion seconded by Commissioner Beckley and carried
by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Bec;1 E- -y, 3 r i {gs , Clemson, Garvin,
Jr psi`: !.`n
NOES: t;,)ne
ABSENT: C)an;:is: ;_ 1e s: ,;one
1
1
Planning Commission Minutes
November 23, 1965
Page Nine 9-gGgr1=T -1:4 r =1365
9. OLD BUSINESS
a. City Attorney Flandrick su'Dmitted the proposed ordinance on
Variances and Conditional Use Permits.
A motion was made by Commissioner Clemson that the Planning
Commission recommend to tha City Council the adoption of this
ordinance including any deletions and /or additions. Motion
seconded by Commissioner Bricgs and carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Bec.le y, Triggs, Clemson, Garvin,
Johnston
NOES: Commissioners; None
ABSENT; Commissioners: None
10. MATTERS FRO,i CITY OFFICIALS
Planning Director Cushman reviewed the amendment to the Zoning
Ordinance regarding land take for public use. City !Attorney
Flandrick stated that the Planning Commission should by motion
set this item for public hearinc.
A motion was made by Commissioner Beckley to set the public hear-
ing for January 11, 1966 at the regular Planning Commission Meet-
ing. Motion seconded by Commissioner Clemson and carried by
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Briggs, Clemson, Garvin,
Johnston
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
11. ADJOURNMPT r; motion was made by Commissioner Beckley, seconded
by Comma sioner Clemson that the meeting be adjourned to a
special study session for the express purpose of interviewing
a job applicant only, December 21, 1965 at 7 :00 P.. in the North
Meeting Room. Motion carried unanimously. Meetinc adjourned
at 10:15 P.M.
ATTEST:
City Clerk