Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutMinutes - 1965/12/14 - RegularDecember 14, 1965 PL',NN' v a C.(j:" sS i ;! h. tIeTES C i 1'e . OF T EiniPeE CT'( 1. A regular meeting of the P l ann i nj Cornrn Y s s i on of the City of City was held in the City Hall, 5938 North Kaaifman Avenue, City. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Johnston 7:30 P.M. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag led by Chairman Johnston. 3. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners: Beckley, Briggs, Clemson, Garvin, Johnston Absent: Commissioners: None Also Present : Ray Cushman, R. F l andr i ck, K. Koski 4. APPROVAL OF MATES: A motion was made by Commissioner Briggs that the minutes of the Regular Adjourned Meeting be approved as written. Motion seconded by Commissioner Garvin and carried by the following roll call vote: Temple Temple at was AYES: Commissioners: NOES :. Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Briggs, Clemson, Garvin Nona None Beckley, Johnston, due to absence A motion was made by Commissioner Briggs that the minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 23, 1965, be approved as corrected per item 8 (b) Page 10, date to be January 25, 1966 instead of January 11, 1966 and Page 9 paragraph 7, motion seconded by Commissioner Garvin instead of Commissioner Clemson. Motion sec- onded by Commissioner Garvin and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Commissioners: Commissioners: Commissioners: 5. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: Briggs, Clemson, Garvin None None Beckley, Johnston, due to absence 2-0 €1E VARIANCE CASE NO, 65-U3 Ernest A. E Esther G. Hinricks (Owner) 6220 North Hart Temple City, California Rudy Strnad (Applicant) 1018 Bradshaw Monterey Park, California Planning Director Cushman reviewed the case briefly for the aud- ience and the Commissioners stating that the applicant's proposal is to build and operate a 'quick stop' convenience type food market with less than the required parking. The mar;:et would be a part of a national chain; the main discussion from the last meeting was the parking requirements and the flow of traffic at that partftular corner: there will be no fresh meat sold on the premises, but will be a delicatessen. Commissioner Beckley asked ✓r. Cushman if the meetinc; had been held with himself, Karl and the Traffic Engineer as suggested in the minutes of the last meeting. ;Pi ?rning Di c ton Cushman stated the meeting wns held end several different designs were i i ' H u s - t r a t e d to see i 1 ore additional parking space Cow; i d be acriuired. He was able to platee nine spares in the front, bet the service A entrance would be �, t < „v ?F' rear entrance and +:'';I.^-.� rif'.. � ? VCi1% trucks would be b l oc;t i ng the el i ey. P? ann i ni° l® recto; Cushman stated he now has as good t design as e. coe d Planning Commission ;Minutes December 14, 1965 Page Two HevembeF -23; -4965 Appearing in favor: Mr. Rudy Strnad, 1018 Bradshaw, Monterey Park. Mr. Strnad passed around to the Commissioners two pictures of the food arrangement inside the store and also submitted a petition with three property owners listed in favor of granting this variance. Questions were directed to Mr. Strnad regarding parking problems, traffic flow. Mr. Strnad stated that other "Circle K" stores only have 7 -8 parking spaces and this arrangement has proved suff- icient. No one appeared in opposition. After hearing all those desiring to speak a motion was made by Commissioner Clemson that the public hearing be closed. Motion seconded by Commissioner Briggs and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Briggs, Clemson, Garvin, Johnston NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None Commissioner Fackley asked the City Attorney if he woul,.: be qualified to vote in this case due to his absence at th, previous meeting and that he had read the minutes and himself f-lt qual- ified. City Attorney Flandrick stated that he would than be qualified to speak and vote in this variance. Commissioner 3riggs stated that his opinion is it would not be a good thing to grant this variance because of the heavy traffic flow and because of the deficiency in the parking requirements on that particular corner. Commissioner Clemson agreed with the statements made by Commissioner Briggs and also would be very concerned with the deficiency of the parking. Commissioner Garvin concurred with the other Commissioners and Commissioner Beckley stated that he also feels the parking deficiency would be a problem but on the other hand it would probably be an asset to Temple City and would agree to try this on the basis that this would not be setting a precedent and attempt it to see if it would work out. A motion was made by Commissioner Briggs that the City Attorney be instructed to draw a resolution denying this variance re- quest because of the deficiency in the parking. Motion seconded by Commissioner Clemson and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: RESOLUTION JO. 65- 183PC: Briggs, Clemson, Garvin Beckley None Johnston, due to absence at previous meeting A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMM- ISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DENYING A VARIANCE IN ZONE VARIANCE CASE NO. 65 -173. Title to Resolution No. 65 -183PC was read by City Attorney Flandrick. A motion was made by Commissioner Garvin to waive further read- ing and adopt. Motion seconded by Commissyoner Clemson and carr ied by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Beckley; Briggs, Clemson, Garvin, Johnstvl . NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None Planning Commission Minutes Page Three December 14, 1965 City Attorney Flandrick reviewed the appeal procedure for the applicant. 6. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE CHANGE CASE 'N'O. 65 -174 William G rosbe rg (Owner-Applicant) 3875 Coco Avenue Los Angeles 8, California SITE: 6230 -6240 Rosemead Boulevard Temple City, California Chairman Johnston announced that now was the time and place for the public hearing. Verification of public notice was given by the Secretary. Planning Director Cushman presented the original application. The Chairman ordered same marked Exhibit "A" and made a part of the record. The Planning Director then orally presented factual data pertaining to the case and his written report, substantially as given orally was received in evidence by the Chairman, marked Exhibit "3 ". The maps placed for public and Planning Commission view were ordered marked Exhibit "C" and received in evidence. The Exhibits were then viewed by the Commissioners. Appearing in favor: Mr. William Grosberg, 3875 Coco Avenue, Los Angeles. Mr. Grosberg displayed a drawing of the proposed build- ings, which will be one story only, not two as in the drawing itself. He stated that as of now he has no specific type of store to go in there. The size of the stores will be approximateli 135 x 50 with room for trucks to deliver at the side of the building. City Manager Koski asked Mr. Grosberg if he had a precise idea as to what type of stores would be going into the shopping area. Mr. Grosberg stated he definitely would like a drug store; will not take any tenants he doesn't want; would like to lease build- ings; considers this area a prosperous area; the building will be attractive; the size of the stores will depend upon the tenant!, leasing them. A question was raised by the Commission as to the vacancy of the stores in the Market Basket shopping area. Mr. Grosberg stated that he does not believe there is a great amount of vacancy there, but there is a definite vacancy problem in the R -4 area on Rosemead pertaining to the apartments on a rental basis. Mr. Herb Weishan, 6225 North Rosemead Boulevard, Temple City. Mr. Weishan stated that there is a need for more commercial property in this area; Rosemead Boulevard is not a residential street; does not feel -4 is an appropriate zoning in that area; if the right type of stores are built there he doesn't feel how they can miss. The traffic on Rosemead Boulevard is enormous and especially during the race track season and on that basis feels this would be an excellent area for C -2 zoning as it stands. Commissioner Clemson read from the Zoning Ordinance the various types of uses permitted in the C -2 zone. Mrs. Frank Jones, 6212 North Reno, Temple City. Mrs. Jones lives in the County area. She asked the Commission if there would be any control of the stores backing up to her property, Planning Director Cushman stated that the County could at its option, make a study of the entire area for possible re- zoning, but not for only one piece of property; it could be considered for pre - zoning because of this area being part of the annexation area to Temple City as Annexation No, M. Mrs. Jc nes stated that she would be in favor of C-2 Zoninc Chairman Johnston s °.,,nted that the Commission could pre -zone this area subject to annexation to Trripie City and that they would be very happy to help in any way possble. Planning Commission Minutes Page Four December 14, 1965 Mr. Carl Lindemann, 6202 North Rosemead Boulevard, Temple City. Mr. Lindemann owns property to the south. Mr. Lindemann stated that his property should be re -zoned C -2 and the blocks including the 6100 -6200. He also stated that the R -4 property is becoming an eyesore and they are having a terrible vacancy problem. Mr. George Elliott, 6246 Rosemead Boulevard, Temple City. Mr. Elliott has a Real Estate Office at that location. Mr. Elliott felt that a drug store would be good for that shopping area. He leases and rents stores and feels this would be excellent C -2 zoning and is in favor of the Commission granting this variance. No one appeared in opposition. Re- appearing in favor: Mr. William Grosberg, owner - applicant, 3875 Coco Avenue, Los Angeles. Mr. Grosberg stated that the R -4 zoning in that area is run down and there does occur many vac- ancies. After hearing all those desiring to speak a motion was made by Commissioner Clemson that the public hearing be closed. Motion seconded by Commissioner Briggs and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Briggs, Clemson, Garvin, Johnston NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None Commissioner Briggs stated that he felt these three parcels should not be considered by themselves; the Commission owes the people in that area the right to make a study on both sides of the street and see what can . be done, instead of just spot zoning this area. Commissioner Garvin felt that consideration should be given to the entire area and that ingress and egress might be difficult and that the Commissioners should not compare this proposed shopping area with others in the immediate area. Commissioner 3ec.ley stated that when this area was zoned R -4, it was done so because all of these particular lots are small and this area should not be spot zoned, but it doesn't really seem to be spot zoning because this would be adjoining another portion of C -2 on Rosemead Boulevard and that the area does seem to be over -built with apartments and rentals, and felt that a site development plan should be submitted. Planning Director Cushman stated that a site development plan comes in as a requirement when changing from potential zoning and this does not apply to this request. Under a zone change you have to assume the developer will develop the property as shown on a drawing or plot plan. Commissioner Briggs felt the Commission should make a study of the entire area because of the possibility of further re- zoning in the area. Chairman Johnston stated that he does concur with the other Commissioners and suggested that this Zone Change re- quest be held over to the next regular meeting so that a further study could be made of the area. City Attorney Flandrick clarified that a "Site Development Plan" is a device by which you assure yourself that the applicant has complied with the Ordinance. Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1965 Page Five A motion was made by Commissioner Briggs that the public hearing be re- opened and that the Planning Commission take this case under submission for further study on re- zoning in that area and this item be placed on the agenda of the January 25, 1966 regular Planning Commission Meeting. Motion seconded by Chair- man Johnston and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Briggs, Johnston NOES: Commissioners: Clemson, Garvin ABSENT :Commissioners: None 7. PUBLIC HEARD G: ZONE VARIANCE CASE NO 65 -175 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 65 -176 Genevieve M. Holman (Owner) 57392 Temple City Boulevard Temple City,Cal ifornia Hulbert R. Stone (Applicant) 9302 Pitkin Street Rosemead, California SITE: 9446 East Las Tunas Drive Temple City, Ca l i fo rn i s Chairman. Johnston announced that now was the time and place for the public hearing. Verification of public notice was given by the Secretary. Planning Director Cushman presented the original application. The Chairman ordered same marked Exhibit "A" and made a part of the record. The Planning Director then orally presented factual data pertaining to the case and his written report, substantially as given orally was received in evidence by the Chairman, marked Exhibit "B ". The maps placed for public and Planning Commission view were ordered marked Exhibit "C" and received in evidence. The Exhibits were then viewed by the Commission. Planning Director Cushman briefly reviewed the two cases and clarified the reasons for the separate filings. First the Conditional Use Permit for the Hunter's Inn is required because the applicant proposes to operate a restaurant with on -sale alcoholic beverages within 200 feet of property in Zone R -3. The Zone Variance Case is required because Section 1704 of the Zoning Ordinance prohibits building enlargements when a non - conforming use exists on the property. The existing Hunter's inn property is legal non- conforming as to parking. While there is sufficient parking under the regulations existing when the buildings were erected, the proposed 25 parking spaces are approximately one - half of present requirements. Therefore the variance is requested to permit an enlargement of about.600 square feet with total parking for 25 cars. Questions were directed to Planning Director Cushman regarding the parking spaces, the existing drive and the new access drive- way. Appearing in favor: Mrs. Genevieve Holman, Owner, 5739 Temple City Boulevard, Temple City. Mrs. Holman stated she would like t•:' see the restaurant open again which could be an asset to Temple City. Planning Commession Minutes December 14, 1965 'Page Six Mr. Hulbert R. Stone, Applicant, 9302 Pitkin Street, Rosemead. Mr. Stone stated that the enlargement would be a part of the bar and would be extended approximately 20 feet; the entrance would be on Las Tunas and re- modeling would be done to the front of the building. Mr. Stone stated that he did have a drawing of the proposed re- modeling of the building in the car and if the Comm- ission would like to see it, he could bring it in. The Commission stated they would. Chairman Johnston recessed the meeting for 5 minutes at 9:10 P.M. The meeting was re- convened at 9:15 P.M. for further business on the agenda. The Commissioners looked at the elevation of the proposed re- modeling of the Hunter's Inn. Mr. Stone stated that the west and south sides will be as existing the addition is purely a piano bar with no other entertainment and will seat 8-10; the present maximum rate of fire capacity is 150 people. "ir. Stone stated that he has operated a dinner house and a bar prior and complete lunches and dinners will be served. Planning .iirector Cushman stated that the City Council will have to review the liquor license. Mr. Stone stated that 4 of these parking spaces will be used by the employees. No one appeared in opposition. After hearing all those desiring to speak a motion was made by Commissioner Clemson that the public hearing be closed. Motion seconded by Commissioner Garvin and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Briggs, Clemson, Garvin, Johnston NOES: Commissioners: none ABSENT: Commissioners: None Planning Director Cushman stated that if the variance is granted, the parking will be approved for 25 parking spaces as shown on the plot plan. On the south side of the subject property a 5 foot high block wall separates the parking lot from the adjacent. two houses. The wall extends to within 20 feet or the Oak Avenue frontage and a three foot high chain link fence extends to the front property line with an ivy over- growth; that the harking lot may need to be re- surfaced and bumper guards should be a part of the conditions; no landscaping is shown because it would probably eliminate two of the parking spaces. Discussion was held among the Commissioners regarding the block wall, parking spaces and landscaping of the parking lot. A motion was made by Commissioner Beckley, seconded by Commissione Briggs that the public hearing be re- opened and held over to the meeting of January 11, 1966 with a plot plan to be submitted show- ing the exact parking layout including parking spaces, striping and bumper guards. Chairman Johnston asked if this would inconvenience Mr. Stone t:; hold this hearing over. Mr. Stone stated it definitely would interfere with his plans. The motion died due to a lack of the roll call vote. Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1965 Page Seven Discussion was held regarding possible conditions such as the lights to conform to the City Ordinance; the wall height on west side to conform to the ordinance; wall on the south side brought up to city standards; paving of the parking lot be inspected by the proper city officials and approved. If landscaping is a con- dition it must conform so as not to involve parking spaces. A motion was made by Commissioner Beckley to instruct the City Attorney to draw a resolution granting this variance with the following conditions attached. That the development of the subject property shall be substantially in accord with the plot plan, exhibits 11A" and "B "; that they comply with all ordinance require- ments regarding off - street parking except, that the landscaping and setback requirements thereof need not be observed; that the total number of such spaces shall be at all times maintained for a total of 25 as shown on Exhibit "A "; paving to be inspected and if found not to be in reasonably good condition, resurfaced; this variance shall expire and be of no effect unless exercised within a period of one year from and after the data of adoption of this resolution; applicant shall file or cause to be filed with the City Clerk a document which the City may record, which shall acknowledge that the owner of the Subject Proprrty is aware of and accepts the conditions sat forth in paragraphs (a) thru (c) above; and that the Subject ?roperty, regardless of any change in ownership is bound by and subject to the provisions of this Resolution and the conditions contained herein. Motion seconded by Commissioner Clemson and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Clemson, Garvin, Johnston NOES: Commissioners: Briggs ABSENT: Commissioners: None City Attorney Flandrick reviewed the conditions and presented the proposed resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 65- 185PC: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIC OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY GRANTING A VA„IANCE IN ZONE VARIANCE CASE NO. 65- 1/5 WITH CERTAIN CONDITIONS. Title to Resolution No. 65 -185PC was read by City Attorney Flandrick. A motion was made by Commissioner Garvin to waive further read- ing and adopt. Motion seconded by Commissioner Clemson and carr- ied by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Briggs, Clemson, Garvin, Johnston NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: None 8. PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE .PERMIT NO. 65 -176 Hulbert R. :Acme (Applicant) 9302 Pitkin Street Rosemead, Cal i forn i a Genevieve N. Holman (Owner) 57392 Temple City Boullevard Temple City, California SITE: 9446 East Las Tunas Drive Tempe C ?..y, California Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1965 Page Eight -!®vambac- 237 -4945 RESOLUTION NO. 65- 18IPC: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISS- ION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY GRANT - ING A VARIANCE IN ZONE VARIANCE CASE NO. 65 -172 WITH CERTAIN CONDITIONS. Title to Resolution No. 65 -181PC was read by ;sistant City Attorney F1.andrick. A motion was made by Commissioner Briggs to waive further read - ing and adopt. Motion seconded by Commissioner Garvin and carr- ied by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Briggs, Clemson, Garvin NOES: Commissioners: None ABSE'T: Commissioners: Beckley, Johnston Vice Chairman Clemson called a five minute recess at 9 :15 P.M. Meeting was reconvened at 9 :20 P.M. for further agenda items. 6. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE VARIANCE CASE NO. 65 -13 Ernest A. t. Esther G. Hinricks (Owner) 6220 North Hart Temple City, California Rudy 'Strnad (Applicant) 1010 E radshaw Monterey Park, California SITE: 9730 Las Tunas Drive Temple City, California Vice Chairman Clemson announced that now was the time and place for the public hearing. Verification of public notice was given by the Secretary. Planning Director Cushman presented the original application. The Chairman ordered same marked Exhibit "i" and made a part of the record. The Planning Director then orally presented factual data pertaining to the case and his written report, substantially as given orally was received in evidence by the Chairman, marked Exhibit " " ". The maps placed for !public and Planning Commission view were ordered marked Exhibit "C" and received in evidence. The Exhibits were then viewed by the Commission. Discussion was held among the Commissioners regarding the feas- ibility of another parking space on the blac: top area to make a total of 10 spaces. Planning Director Cushman stated that if they did it could be a possible hazard for cars backing into it. Appearing in favor: ;;r. Rudy Strnad, 1018 :Bradshaw, Monterey Park. ; sir. Strnad is the developed for the "Circle K" Corpora - tion a National Food Chain. Mr. Strnad stated that there are 20 Circle K Stores in Arizona and that the turn -over in cust- omers is pretty qu i c'._ in this type of operation; hours of opera - tion would be from 7:00 A.M. to 11:00 P.M. No fresh meats wi l l be sold on the premises, but it will be like a regular food market in all other respects. There will be a 12 x 5 enclosed trash area on the southeast corner of the .lot; the major deliv- eries will come on a semi -truck and will come in the front so that it would not jeopardize the parking of the customers in the rear lot. Mr. Strnad stated that he is not a partner in the chain. There is a 20 foot wide paved alley in the rear. Mr. Strnad presented pictures to the Commission on other stores. Dread and milk are delivered on a daily basis. No one appeared in opposition. After hearing all those desiring to speak a motion was made by Commissioner Briggs that the public hearing be closed. Motion seconded by Commissioner ` :arvin and carried by the following roll call vote: Planning Commission Minutes Page ;Vine Mvembnr-25;-19f5 December 14, 1965, AYES: Commissioners: Briggs, Garvin, Clemson NOES: Commissioners: None /'ABSENT: Commissioners: Beckley, Johnston Commissioner Garvin stated that over a period of time some stores or this type do become an eyesore and was quite concerned with a store of this type being located across from Temple City Par:: and Civic Center. Planning Director Cushman stated that the amount of traffic would probably increase as to what there is now. Vice Chairman Clemson clarified to the Commission the various uses of the C -2 zone stating there are uses :Dthar than this type that could certainly be more of a detriment at this loca- tion. Planning Director Cushman stated that the basic issue is the parting requirements not the type of use, because this use is permitted in the C -2 zone and that they have 9 parking spaces and the ordinance calls for 13. He also pointed out the diff- erent land uses in the area and stated percentage wise this store's parking is commensurate with other super markets in the area. Discussion was held on this type of operation being kept up and the lack of parking and the area. City Attorney Flandrick noted for the record that no one had left the room at this time. After further discussion a motion was made by Commissioner Briggs that the public hearing be re-opened for additional questioning to the applicant. Motion seconded by Commissioner Clemson and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Briggs, Clemson, Garvin NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Beckley, Johnston Appearing in favor: Mr. Rudy Strnad, applicant, 1018 Bradshaw, Monterey Park. Mr. , Strnad stated that the Circle K Food Chain is the largest chain in the area and there are six stores of this type in Phoenix. Their maintenance department is an asset, the markets are always kept up; approximately every three years the markets are painted whether they need it or not; the parking lot will be cleaned daily and always kept up to standards. Commissioner Clemson asked if planters of soma type will be on the front of the building to make it more attractive. Mr. Strnad said it would be a good idea but generally this type of thing is used for a waste basket. Discussion was held among the Commissioners regarding the con- tinuation of this variance to the next regular meeting so that the Commission could further discuss the main issues of this variance. Mr. Strnad stated he would be in favor of the con- tinuation if so needed by the Commission. City Manager Koski asked Mr. Strnad if these stores were run on a franchise and he stated no they are not. The outdoor display would consist of no banners, but they would have commercial time on the radio, one sicin on the roof and one sign in the corner. Appearing as neutral: Mr. Harold Dober, 5841 North Golden West, Temple City. Mr. Dober was wondering if the building could be backed up to the property line and the parking utilized in the front. Planning Director Cushman stated this could not be done because of the lack of parking spaces. Planning Commission Minutes Page Ten -±ovember-237 -fi965 December 14, 1965 Discussion was held regarding the turn - around area and the possibility of a block wall being constructed on the west prop- erty line. After hearing all those desiring to speak a motion was made by Commissioner Briggs that the public hearing be closed. Motion seconded by Commissioner Garvin and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Briggs, Clemson, Garvin HOES: Commissioners: one ABSENT: Commissioners: ec<ley, Johnston Discussion was held among the Commissioners and it was decided that this variance should be continued to the next regular meeting for further discussion. City Attorney Flandric; noted for the record that no one had left the room at this time. A motion was made by Commissioner Briggs that the public hearing be re- opened and continued to the next regular meeting of Dec- ember 14, 1965, at 7:30 P.M. Motion seconded by Commissioner Garvin and carried by the following roll call vote: APES: Commissioners: HOES: Commissioners: /\LSE`'.T: Commissioners: Briggs, Clemson, Garvin None Beckley, Johnston It was suggested that fir. Strnad arrange an appointment with City Manager Koski, i6r. Cushman, Planning Director and Mr. Envall, Traffic Engineer to discuss parking and traffic prob- lems. 7. OLD 3US I NESS a. The discussion on the proposed Ordinance on Variances and Conditional Use Permits was continued to the next regular meeting. 8. MATTER J FROM CITY OF;" I C i ALS a. Planning Director Cushman stated that in their folders was a copy of a possible recommendation to the City Council re- garding Suggested City Policy on County - !Approved Lot Splits in the Annexation ;:,yeas. A motion was made by Commissioner Garvin that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the possible policy on County - Approved Lot Splits in Annexation Areas. Motion seconded by Commissioner Briggs and carried by the following roll call vote: ;',YES: Commissioners; Briggs, Clemson, Garvin NOES: Commissioners: None i SENT: Commissioners: Beckley, Johnston b. Discussion was held on the urgency ordinance regarding the freeze on entertainment licenses. Motion was made by Comm- issioner Garvin to instruct staff to set this item for public hearing on January 11, 1966. Motion seconded by Commissioner 'Triggs and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Briggs, Clemson, Garvin ,:TES: Commissioners: None :BSENT: Commissioners: Beckley, Johnston Staff was instructed to notify the City Council of this action taken by the Commission. 1 1 Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1965 Page Eleven 'ev mber-23;-i965 9. ADJJl1 ' MENT: A motion was made by Commissioner Garvin, seconded cy Commissioner Briggs that the eeti g be adjo rned to the next regular adjourned meeting „ fiber 10, 1965o at 7 :00 P.M. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 10 :15 P.M. ATTEST: City C"ierk (_„e