HomeMy Public PortalAboutMinutes - 1965/12/14 - RegularDecember 14, 1965
PL',NN' v a C.(j:" sS i ;! h. tIeTES
C i 1'e . OF T EiniPeE CT'(
1. A regular meeting of the P l ann i nj Cornrn Y s s i on of the City of
City was held in the City Hall, 5938 North Kaaifman Avenue,
City. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Johnston
7:30 P.M.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
led by Chairman Johnston.
3. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners: Beckley, Briggs, Clemson,
Garvin, Johnston
Absent: Commissioners: None
Also Present : Ray Cushman, R. F l andr i ck, K. Koski
4. APPROVAL OF MATES: A motion was made by Commissioner Briggs
that the minutes of the Regular Adjourned Meeting be approved as
written. Motion seconded by Commissioner Garvin and carried by
the following roll call vote:
Temple
Temple
at
was
AYES: Commissioners:
NOES :. Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
Briggs, Clemson, Garvin
Nona
None
Beckley, Johnston, due to absence
A motion was made by Commissioner Briggs that the minutes of the
Regular Meeting of November 23, 1965, be approved as corrected
per item 8 (b) Page 10, date to be January 25, 1966 instead of
January 11, 1966 and Page 9 paragraph 7, motion seconded by
Commissioner Garvin instead of Commissioner Clemson. Motion sec-
onded by Commissioner Garvin and carried by the following roll
call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
5. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING:
Briggs, Clemson, Garvin
None
None
Beckley, Johnston, due to absence
2-0 €1E VARIANCE CASE NO, 65-U3
Ernest A. E Esther G. Hinricks (Owner)
6220 North Hart
Temple City, California
Rudy Strnad (Applicant)
1018 Bradshaw
Monterey Park, California
Planning Director Cushman reviewed the case briefly for the aud-
ience and the Commissioners stating that the applicant's proposal
is to build and operate a 'quick stop' convenience type food
market with less than the required parking. The mar;:et would be
a part of a national chain; the main discussion from the last
meeting was the parking requirements and the flow of traffic at
that partftular corner: there will be no fresh meat sold on the
premises, but will be a delicatessen.
Commissioner Beckley asked ✓r. Cushman if the meetinc; had been
held with himself, Karl and the Traffic Engineer as suggested in
the minutes of the last meeting. ;Pi ?rning Di c ton Cushman stated
the meeting wns held end several different designs were i i ' H u s -
t r a t e d to see i 1 ore additional parking space Cow; i d be acriuired.
He was able to platee nine spares in the front, bet the service
A
entrance would be �, t < „v ?F' rear entrance and +:'';I.^-.� rif'.. � ? VCi1% trucks
would be b l oc;t i ng the el i ey. P? ann i ni° l® recto; Cushman stated
he now has as good t design as e. coe d
Planning Commission ;Minutes December 14, 1965
Page Two HevembeF -23; -4965
Appearing in favor: Mr. Rudy Strnad, 1018 Bradshaw, Monterey
Park. Mr. Strnad passed around to the Commissioners two pictures
of the food arrangement inside the store and also submitted a
petition with three property owners listed in favor of granting
this variance.
Questions were directed to Mr. Strnad regarding parking problems,
traffic flow. Mr. Strnad stated that other "Circle K" stores
only have 7 -8 parking spaces and this arrangement has proved suff-
icient.
No one appeared in opposition.
After hearing all those desiring to speak a motion was made by
Commissioner Clemson that the public hearing be closed. Motion
seconded by Commissioner Briggs and carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Briggs, Clemson, Garvin,
Johnston
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
Commissioner Fackley asked the City Attorney if he woul,.: be
qualified to vote in this case due to his absence at th, previous
meeting and that he had read the minutes and himself f-lt qual-
ified. City Attorney Flandrick stated that he would than be
qualified to speak and vote in this variance.
Commissioner 3riggs stated that his opinion is it would not be a
good thing to grant this variance because of the heavy traffic
flow and because of the deficiency in the parking requirements on
that particular corner. Commissioner Clemson agreed with the
statements made by Commissioner Briggs and also would be very
concerned with the deficiency of the parking. Commissioner Garvin
concurred with the other Commissioners and Commissioner Beckley
stated that he also feels the parking deficiency would be a
problem but on the other hand it would probably be an asset to
Temple City and would agree to try this on the basis that this
would not be setting a precedent and attempt it to see if it would
work out.
A motion was made by Commissioner Briggs that the City Attorney
be instructed to draw a resolution denying this variance re-
quest because of the deficiency in the parking. Motion seconded
by Commissioner Clemson and carried by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
RESOLUTION JO. 65- 183PC:
Briggs, Clemson, Garvin
Beckley
None
Johnston, due to absence at previous
meeting
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMM-
ISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DENYING
A VARIANCE IN ZONE VARIANCE CASE NO.
65 -173.
Title to Resolution No. 65 -183PC was read by City Attorney
Flandrick.
A motion was made by Commissioner Garvin to waive further read-
ing and adopt. Motion seconded by Commissyoner Clemson and carr
ied by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley; Briggs, Clemson, Garvin,
Johnstvl
.
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
Planning Commission Minutes
Page Three
December 14, 1965
City Attorney Flandrick reviewed the appeal procedure for the
applicant.
6. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE CHANGE CASE 'N'O. 65 -174
William G rosbe rg (Owner-Applicant)
3875 Coco Avenue
Los Angeles 8, California
SITE: 6230 -6240 Rosemead Boulevard
Temple City, California
Chairman Johnston announced that now was the time and place for
the public hearing. Verification of public notice was given by
the Secretary. Planning Director Cushman presented the original
application. The Chairman ordered same marked Exhibit "A" and
made a part of the record. The Planning Director then orally
presented factual data pertaining to the case and his written
report, substantially as given orally was received in evidence
by the Chairman, marked Exhibit "3 ". The maps placed for public
and Planning Commission view were ordered marked Exhibit "C" and
received in evidence. The Exhibits were then viewed by the
Commissioners.
Appearing in favor: Mr. William Grosberg, 3875 Coco Avenue, Los
Angeles. Mr. Grosberg displayed a drawing of the proposed build-
ings, which will be one story only, not two as in the drawing
itself. He stated that as of now he has no specific type of
store to go in there. The size of the stores will be approximateli
135 x 50 with room for trucks to deliver at the side of the
building.
City Manager Koski asked Mr. Grosberg if he had a precise idea
as to what type of stores would be going into the shopping area.
Mr. Grosberg stated he definitely would like a drug store; will
not take any tenants he doesn't want; would like to lease build-
ings; considers this area a prosperous area; the building will
be attractive; the size of the stores will depend upon the tenant!,
leasing them. A question was raised by the Commission as to the
vacancy of the stores in the Market Basket shopping area. Mr.
Grosberg stated that he does not believe there is a great amount
of vacancy there, but there is a definite vacancy problem in the
R -4 area on Rosemead pertaining to the apartments on a rental
basis.
Mr. Herb Weishan, 6225 North Rosemead Boulevard, Temple City. Mr.
Weishan stated that there is a need for more commercial property
in this area; Rosemead Boulevard is not a residential street;
does not feel -4 is an appropriate zoning in that area; if the
right type of stores are built there he doesn't feel how they
can miss. The traffic on Rosemead Boulevard is enormous and
especially during the race track season and on that basis feels
this would be an excellent area for C -2 zoning as it stands.
Commissioner Clemson read from the Zoning Ordinance the various
types of uses permitted in the C -2 zone.
Mrs. Frank Jones, 6212 North Reno, Temple City. Mrs. Jones lives
in the County area. She asked the Commission if there would be
any control of the stores backing up to her property, Planning
Director Cushman stated that the County could at its option,
make a study of the entire area for possible re- zoning, but not
for only one piece of property; it could be considered for pre -
zoning because of this area being part of the annexation area to
Temple City as Annexation No, M. Mrs. Jc nes stated that she
would be in favor of C-2 Zoninc
Chairman Johnston s °.,,nted that the Commission could pre -zone this
area subject to annexation to Trripie City and that they would
be very happy to help in any way possble.
Planning Commission Minutes
Page Four
December 14, 1965
Mr. Carl Lindemann, 6202 North Rosemead Boulevard, Temple City.
Mr. Lindemann owns property to the south. Mr. Lindemann stated
that his property should be re -zoned C -2 and the blocks including
the 6100 -6200. He also stated that the R -4 property is becoming
an eyesore and they are having a terrible vacancy problem.
Mr. George Elliott, 6246 Rosemead Boulevard, Temple City. Mr.
Elliott has a Real Estate Office at that location. Mr. Elliott
felt that a drug store would be good for that shopping area. He
leases and rents stores and feels this would be excellent C -2
zoning and is in favor of the Commission granting this variance.
No one appeared in opposition.
Re- appearing in favor: Mr. William Grosberg, owner - applicant,
3875 Coco Avenue, Los Angeles. Mr. Grosberg stated that the R -4
zoning in that area is run down and there does occur many vac-
ancies.
After hearing all those desiring to speak a motion was made by
Commissioner Clemson that the public hearing be closed. Motion
seconded by Commissioner Briggs and carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Briggs, Clemson, Garvin,
Johnston
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
Commissioner Briggs stated that he felt these three parcels
should not be considered by themselves; the Commission owes the
people in that area the right to make a study on both sides of
the street and see what can . be done, instead of just spot zoning
this area. Commissioner Garvin felt that consideration should
be given to the entire area and that ingress and egress might
be difficult and that the Commissioners should not compare this
proposed shopping area with others in the immediate area.
Commissioner 3ec.ley stated that when this area was zoned R -4,
it was done so because all of these particular lots are small
and this area should not be spot zoned, but it doesn't really
seem to be spot zoning because this would be adjoining another
portion of C -2 on Rosemead Boulevard and that the area does seem
to be over -built with apartments and rentals, and felt that a
site development plan should be submitted.
Planning Director Cushman stated that a site development plan
comes in as a requirement when changing from potential zoning
and this does not apply to this request. Under a zone change
you have to assume the developer will develop the property as
shown on a drawing or plot plan.
Commissioner Briggs felt the Commission should make a study of
the entire area because of the possibility of further re- zoning
in the area. Chairman Johnston stated that he does concur with
the other Commissioners and suggested that this Zone Change re-
quest be held over to the next regular meeting so that a further
study could be made of the area.
City Attorney Flandrick clarified that a "Site Development Plan"
is a device by which you assure yourself that the applicant has
complied with the Ordinance.
Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1965
Page Five
A motion was made by Commissioner Briggs that the public hearing
be re- opened and that the Planning Commission take this case
under submission for further study on re- zoning in that area
and this item be placed on the agenda of the January 25, 1966
regular Planning Commission Meeting. Motion seconded by Chair-
man Johnston and carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Briggs, Johnston
NOES: Commissioners: Clemson, Garvin
ABSENT :Commissioners: None
7. PUBLIC HEARD G: ZONE VARIANCE CASE NO 65 -175 AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 65 -176
Genevieve M. Holman (Owner)
57392 Temple City Boulevard
Temple City,Cal ifornia
Hulbert R. Stone (Applicant)
9302 Pitkin Street
Rosemead, California
SITE: 9446 East Las Tunas Drive
Temple City, Ca l i fo rn i s
Chairman. Johnston announced that now was the time and place for
the public hearing. Verification of public notice was given by
the Secretary. Planning Director Cushman presented the original
application. The Chairman ordered same marked Exhibit "A" and
made a part of the record. The Planning Director then orally
presented factual data pertaining to the case and his written
report, substantially as given orally was received in evidence
by the Chairman, marked Exhibit "B ". The maps placed for public
and Planning Commission view were ordered marked Exhibit "C" and
received in evidence. The Exhibits were then viewed by the
Commission.
Planning Director Cushman briefly reviewed the two cases and
clarified the reasons for the separate filings. First the
Conditional Use Permit for the Hunter's Inn is required because
the applicant proposes to operate a restaurant with on -sale
alcoholic beverages within 200 feet of property in Zone R -3. The
Zone Variance Case is required because Section 1704 of the Zoning
Ordinance prohibits building enlargements when a non - conforming
use exists on the property. The existing Hunter's inn property
is legal non- conforming as to parking. While there is sufficient
parking under the regulations existing when the buildings were
erected, the proposed 25 parking spaces are approximately one -
half of present requirements. Therefore the variance is requested
to permit an enlargement of about.600 square feet with total
parking for 25 cars.
Questions were directed to Planning Director Cushman regarding
the parking spaces, the existing drive and the new access drive-
way.
Appearing in favor: Mrs. Genevieve Holman, Owner, 5739 Temple
City Boulevard, Temple City. Mrs. Holman stated she would like t•:'
see the restaurant open again which could be an asset to Temple
City.
Planning Commession Minutes December 14, 1965
'Page Six
Mr. Hulbert R. Stone, Applicant, 9302 Pitkin Street, Rosemead.
Mr. Stone stated that the enlargement would be a part of the bar
and would be extended approximately 20 feet; the entrance would
be on Las Tunas and re- modeling would be done to the front of
the building. Mr. Stone stated that he did have a drawing of the
proposed re- modeling of the building in the car and if the Comm-
ission would like to see it, he could bring it in. The Commission
stated they would.
Chairman Johnston recessed the meeting for 5 minutes at 9:10 P.M.
The meeting was re- convened at 9:15 P.M. for further business on
the agenda.
The Commissioners looked at the elevation of the proposed re-
modeling of the Hunter's Inn.
Mr. Stone stated that the west and south sides will be as existing
the addition is purely a piano bar with no other entertainment
and will seat 8-10; the present maximum rate of fire capacity is
150 people. "ir. Stone stated that he has operated a dinner house
and a bar prior and complete lunches and dinners will be served.
Planning .iirector Cushman stated that the City Council will have
to review the liquor license. Mr. Stone stated that 4 of these
parking spaces will be used by the employees.
No one appeared in opposition.
After hearing all those desiring to speak a motion was made by
Commissioner Clemson that the public hearing be closed. Motion
seconded by Commissioner Garvin and carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Briggs, Clemson, Garvin,
Johnston
NOES: Commissioners: none
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
Planning Director Cushman stated that if the variance is granted,
the parking will be approved for 25 parking spaces as shown on
the plot plan. On the south side of the subject property a 5
foot high block wall separates the parking lot from the adjacent.
two houses. The wall extends to within 20 feet or the Oak Avenue
frontage and a three foot high chain link fence extends to the
front property line with an ivy over- growth; that the harking lot
may need to be re- surfaced and bumper guards should be a part of
the conditions; no landscaping is shown because it would probably
eliminate two of the parking spaces.
Discussion was held among the Commissioners regarding the block
wall, parking spaces and landscaping of the parking lot.
A motion was made by Commissioner Beckley, seconded by Commissione
Briggs that the public hearing be re- opened and held over to the
meeting of January 11, 1966 with a plot plan to be submitted show-
ing the exact parking layout including parking spaces, striping
and bumper guards.
Chairman Johnston asked if this would inconvenience Mr. Stone t:;
hold this hearing over. Mr. Stone stated it definitely would
interfere with his plans.
The motion died due to a lack of the roll call vote.
Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1965
Page Seven
Discussion was held regarding possible conditions such as the
lights to conform to the City Ordinance; the wall height on west
side to conform to the ordinance; wall on the south side brought
up to city standards; paving of the parking lot be inspected by
the proper city officials and approved. If landscaping is a con-
dition it must conform so as not to involve parking spaces.
A motion was made by Commissioner Beckley to instruct the City
Attorney to draw a resolution granting this variance with the
following conditions attached. That the development of the subject
property shall be substantially in accord with the plot plan,
exhibits 11A" and "B "; that they comply with all ordinance require-
ments regarding off - street parking except, that the landscaping
and setback requirements thereof need not be observed; that the
total number of such spaces shall be at all times maintained for
a total of 25 as shown on Exhibit "A "; paving to be inspected
and if found not to be in reasonably good condition, resurfaced;
this variance shall expire and be of no effect unless exercised
within a period of one year from and after the data of adoption
of this resolution; applicant shall file or cause to be filed
with the City Clerk a document which the City may record, which
shall acknowledge that the owner of the Subject Proprrty is aware
of and accepts the conditions sat forth in paragraphs (a) thru
(c) above; and that the Subject ?roperty, regardless of any change
in ownership is bound by and subject to the provisions of this
Resolution and the conditions contained herein. Motion seconded
by Commissioner Clemson and carried by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Clemson, Garvin, Johnston
NOES: Commissioners: Briggs
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
City Attorney Flandrick reviewed the conditions and presented
the proposed resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 65- 185PC: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIC
OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY GRANTING A
VA„IANCE IN ZONE VARIANCE CASE NO. 65-
1/5 WITH CERTAIN CONDITIONS.
Title to Resolution No. 65 -185PC was read by City Attorney
Flandrick.
A motion was made by Commissioner Garvin to waive further read-
ing and adopt. Motion seconded by Commissioner Clemson and carr-
ied by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckley, Briggs, Clemson, Garvin,
Johnston
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
8. PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE .PERMIT NO. 65 -176
Hulbert R. :Acme (Applicant)
9302 Pitkin Street
Rosemead, Cal i forn i a
Genevieve N. Holman (Owner)
57392 Temple City Boullevard
Temple City, California
SITE: 9446 East Las Tunas Drive
Tempe C ?..y, California
Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1965
Page Eight -!®vambac- 237 -4945
RESOLUTION NO. 65- 18IPC: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISS-
ION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY GRANT -
ING A VARIANCE IN ZONE VARIANCE CASE
NO. 65 -172 WITH CERTAIN CONDITIONS.
Title to Resolution No. 65 -181PC was read by ;sistant City
Attorney F1.andrick.
A motion was made by Commissioner Briggs to waive further read -
ing and adopt. Motion seconded by Commissioner Garvin and carr-
ied by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Briggs, Clemson, Garvin
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSE'T: Commissioners: Beckley, Johnston
Vice Chairman Clemson called a five minute recess at 9 :15 P.M.
Meeting was reconvened at 9 :20 P.M. for further agenda items.
6. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE VARIANCE CASE NO. 65 -13
Ernest A. t. Esther G. Hinricks (Owner)
6220 North Hart
Temple City, California
Rudy 'Strnad (Applicant)
1010 E radshaw
Monterey Park, California
SITE: 9730 Las Tunas Drive
Temple City, California
Vice Chairman Clemson announced that now was the time and place
for the public hearing. Verification of public notice was
given by the Secretary. Planning Director Cushman presented the
original application. The Chairman ordered same marked Exhibit
"i" and made a part of the record. The Planning Director then
orally presented factual data pertaining to the case and his
written report, substantially as given orally was received in
evidence by the Chairman, marked Exhibit " " ". The maps placed
for !public and Planning Commission view were ordered marked
Exhibit "C" and received in evidence. The Exhibits were then
viewed by the Commission.
Discussion was held among the Commissioners regarding the feas-
ibility of another parking space on the blac: top area to make
a total of 10 spaces. Planning Director Cushman stated that if
they did it could be a possible hazard for cars backing into it.
Appearing in favor: ;;r. Rudy Strnad, 1018 :Bradshaw, Monterey
Park. ; sir. Strnad is the developed for the "Circle K" Corpora -
tion a National Food Chain. Mr. Strnad stated that there are
20 Circle K Stores in Arizona and that the turn -over in cust-
omers is pretty qu i c'._ in this type of operation; hours of opera -
tion would be from 7:00 A.M. to 11:00 P.M. No fresh meats wi l l
be sold on the premises, but it will be like a regular food
market in all other respects. There will be a 12 x 5 enclosed
trash area on the southeast corner of the .lot; the major deliv-
eries will come on a semi -truck and will come in the front so
that it would not jeopardize the parking of the customers in the
rear lot. Mr. Strnad stated that he is not a partner in the
chain. There is a 20 foot wide paved alley in the rear. Mr.
Strnad presented pictures to the Commission on other stores.
Dread and milk are delivered on a daily basis.
No one appeared in opposition.
After hearing all those desiring to speak a motion was made by
Commissioner Briggs that the public hearing be closed. Motion
seconded by Commissioner ` :arvin and carried by the following roll
call vote:
Planning Commission Minutes
Page ;Vine Mvembnr-25;-19f5
December 14, 1965,
AYES: Commissioners: Briggs, Garvin, Clemson
NOES: Commissioners: None
/'ABSENT: Commissioners: Beckley, Johnston
Commissioner Garvin stated that over a period of time some stores
or this type do become an eyesore and was quite concerned with
a store of this type being located across from Temple City Par::
and Civic Center.
Planning Director Cushman stated that the amount of traffic
would probably increase as to what there is now.
Vice Chairman Clemson clarified to the Commission the various
uses of the C -2 zone stating there are uses :Dthar than this
type that could certainly be more of a detriment at this loca-
tion.
Planning Director Cushman stated that the basic issue is the
parting requirements not the type of use, because this use is
permitted in the C -2 zone and that they have 9 parking spaces
and the ordinance calls for 13. He also pointed out the diff-
erent land uses in the area and stated percentage wise this
store's parking is commensurate with other super markets in the
area.
Discussion was held on this type of operation being kept up and
the lack of parking and the area.
City Attorney Flandrick noted for the record that no one had
left the room at this time.
After further discussion a motion was made by Commissioner
Briggs that the public hearing be re-opened for additional
questioning to the applicant. Motion seconded by Commissioner
Clemson and carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Briggs, Clemson, Garvin
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: Beckley, Johnston
Appearing in favor: Mr. Rudy Strnad, applicant, 1018 Bradshaw,
Monterey Park. Mr. , Strnad stated that the Circle K Food Chain
is the largest chain in the area and there are six stores of
this type in Phoenix. Their maintenance department is an asset,
the markets are always kept up; approximately every three years
the markets are painted whether they need it or not; the parking
lot will be cleaned daily and always kept up to standards.
Commissioner Clemson asked if planters of soma type will be
on the front of the building to make it more attractive. Mr.
Strnad said it would be a good idea but generally this type of
thing is used for a waste basket.
Discussion was held among the Commissioners regarding the con-
tinuation of this variance to the next regular meeting so that
the Commission could further discuss the main issues of this
variance. Mr. Strnad stated he would be in favor of the con-
tinuation if so needed by the Commission. City Manager Koski
asked Mr. Strnad if these stores were run on a franchise and he
stated no they are not. The outdoor display would consist of
no banners, but they would have commercial time on the radio,
one sicin on the roof and one sign in the corner.
Appearing as neutral: Mr. Harold Dober, 5841 North Golden West,
Temple City. Mr. Dober was wondering if the building could be
backed up to the property line and the parking utilized in the
front. Planning Director Cushman stated this could not be done
because of the lack of parking spaces.
Planning Commission Minutes
Page Ten -±ovember-237 -fi965
December 14, 1965
Discussion was held regarding the turn - around area and the
possibility of a block wall being constructed on the west prop-
erty line.
After hearing all those desiring to speak a motion was made by
Commissioner Briggs that the public hearing be closed. Motion
seconded by Commissioner Garvin and carried by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Briggs, Clemson, Garvin
HOES: Commissioners: one
ABSENT: Commissioners: ec<ley, Johnston
Discussion was held among the Commissioners and it was decided
that this variance should be continued to the next regular
meeting for further discussion.
City Attorney Flandric; noted for the record that no one had
left the room at this time.
A motion was made by Commissioner Briggs that the public hearing
be re- opened and continued to the next regular meeting of Dec-
ember 14, 1965, at 7:30 P.M. Motion seconded by Commissioner
Garvin and carried by the following roll call vote:
APES: Commissioners:
HOES: Commissioners:
/\LSE`'.T: Commissioners:
Briggs, Clemson, Garvin
None
Beckley, Johnston
It was suggested that fir. Strnad arrange an appointment with
City Manager Koski, i6r. Cushman, Planning Director and Mr.
Envall, Traffic Engineer to discuss parking and traffic prob-
lems.
7. OLD 3US I NESS
a. The discussion on the proposed Ordinance on Variances and
Conditional Use Permits was continued to the next regular
meeting.
8. MATTER J FROM CITY OF;" I C i ALS
a. Planning Director Cushman stated that in their folders was
a copy of a possible recommendation to the City Council re-
garding Suggested City Policy on County - !Approved Lot Splits
in the Annexation ;:,yeas.
A motion was made by Commissioner Garvin that the Planning
Commission recommend to the City Council the possible policy
on County - Approved Lot Splits in Annexation Areas. Motion
seconded by Commissioner Briggs and carried by the following
roll call vote:
;',YES: Commissioners; Briggs, Clemson, Garvin
NOES: Commissioners: None
i SENT: Commissioners: Beckley, Johnston
b. Discussion was held on the urgency ordinance regarding the
freeze on entertainment licenses. Motion was made by Comm-
issioner Garvin to instruct staff to set this item for public
hearing on January 11, 1966. Motion seconded by Commissioner
'Triggs and carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Briggs, Clemson, Garvin
,:TES: Commissioners: None
:BSENT: Commissioners: Beckley, Johnston
Staff was instructed to notify the City Council of this
action taken by the Commission.
1
1
Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1965
Page Eleven 'ev mber-23;-i965
9. ADJJl1 ' MENT: A motion was made by Commissioner Garvin, seconded
cy Commissioner Briggs that the eeti g be adjo rned to the
next regular adjourned meeting „ fiber 10, 1965o at 7 :00 P.M.
Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 10 :15 P.M.
ATTEST:
City C"ierk
(_„e