Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutMinutes - 1967/01/11 - Regular" III 3. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: ABSENT: ALSO PRESENT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CITY OF TEMPLE CITY January 11, 1967 1 The adjourned meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Temple City was called to order by Chairman Beckman at 7:30 P.M. 2. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Chairman Beckman. 1 1 Commissioners: Garvin, Lawson, Millham, Oakley, Beckman Commissioners: None City Manager Koski, Asst. City Attorney Flandrick, Planning Director Dragicevich, Planning Tech. Burnham 4 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE CHANGE CASE N0. 67 -242 Alexander Haagen, Agent for owners 5505 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles Site: 5409 thru 5429 N. Baldwin Ave. (W. Side) 9933 thru 9945 E. Olive St., (N. Side) The Chairman explained that this was a continued public hearing, and asked the Planning Director if he had anything further to add, and there was not. Therefore the Chairman asked the owner or his repre- sentative if he had anything to add. Mr. Jerry Stack, representative for Alexander Haagen, 5505 Wilshire Blvd., took the podium, stating he wanted to present their stand- point of making the center feasible. First there is the subject of need. Based on statistics and the aerial view, presented here for exhibit, the applicant feels there is a real need for this shopp- ing center at this location. He described the coloring of the aerial map within 1 mile radius from the proposed shopping center, showing shopping centers in the area in relation to the proposed one, in Arcadia, El Monte, and Temple City. By L.A. County population fig- ures, in this area there. are 25,000 people and twelve million dollars in food products. According to the Dept, of Agriculture figure - 28% of average income is spent on food. Eliminating 8% that might go to restaurants, liquor stores, etc., or 20% of gross income of people in that area, they estimate there is 12 million dollars of food volume in that area. He called attention to the 8x11 aerial aerial photograph showing area of proposed project. He said they made a study of this area as to size of families, age of families, children, and other details pertinent to a market study for such a project. The area is not being serviced by a neighborhood shopp- ing center because presently the shopping centers are in other areas, as far as this corner of the City is concerned. Vons have made many studies of market areas, and take into consideration the availability of business, and are so convinced this area is a good location that they have entered into a 25 -year lease on it. He went on that this will be a beautiful building and a costly venture for Vons and they would have to be certain of the results. Mr. Alex Goodman, Manager of the Temple City Chamber of Commerce, spoke for his organization, that they felt this project shows progress and service to the area; there is no other shopping center in this vicinity; other shopping centers serving this area are all located in other cities; this would increase sales revenue $20,000 to $30,000; the assessed valuation now is $52,000 and on completion of the 3 -acre development it will be $300,000 per year which is an increase of $250,000 and this will be a great help to the school district. He felt this would bring people in from outside communit- ies to shop in our city and would help the entire community. PLANNING COMMISSION,MINUTES January 11, 1968 - page two. Mr. Carl Clark, representing the businessmen of Temple City for Bigger and Better Business, said Arcadia annexed the portion that was formerly Schaubs Market and the City was cheated out of a real good busines. The S proposed development he felt would be better than what is presently at Las Tunas and Baldwin, the tax revenue coming into the City will help it, and it will increase pride in the City. Business would come to the City instead of other cities taking business away from us. Baldwin Ave. is designed to take apartments, and he felt a shopping center is, in some respects, more desirable than apartments. Mr. Robert McClellan of Ainsworth & McClellan, 1199 E. Walnut, Pasadena, stated he came mainly to answer any questions that the Planning Commis- sion may have regarding the shopping center development. His firm are the architects for the center. As credentials of his firm he stated they had planned several hundred shopping centers, some 50 centers in Southern California area. He stated"Vons "wants to be a good neighbor and is cooperative. The three basic points are parking, loading, general noise and lights. Regarding parking, 130 cars plus 5 stalls in the service stationYVons "feels is adequate. Years ago the ratio was 3:1. Over a period of time it was not needed. When a parking stall is located 225 ft. or more away from the front door people will drive around just to park closer. Effective parking stalls and their location are what is important. • Commissioner Oakley asked the material of the visible roof on the market and satellite stores, and Mr. McClellan answered it was concrete beam, the facia is plastic, the mansard roof is painted steel and the visible vertical front walls were glazed ceramic tile. In answer to further questions about the building materials to be used on the west side fac- ifig the residential area, Mr. McClellan said it would be tilt -up concrete with architectural treatment, or split block or jumbo brick, that they hadn't gone into a complete set of designs. Commissioner Oakley stated he was concerned that the surface might cause great glare for the resi- dents, and Mr. McClellan said it would not be painted white - probably a sand beige. Commissioner Oakley asked what was contemplated on the west property line for the 6 ft. wall all the way down. The City Atty. injected a statement at this point that anything that was discussed presently was not binding on the applicant or Commission if the case is approved by the Commission and Council. Mr. Bill Davilla, 5730 N. Oak Ave., introduced himself as the advertising man for "Vons',' and a spokesman for the proposed tenancy. He gave a brief history of "Vons" in Los Angeles. The company was formed in 1906 in Los Angeles and grew to 27 stores. In 1960 it merged with "Shopping Bag" and had a chain of 64 stores, In 1967 there were 110 stores. In June of 1967 it divested itself due to a U.S. court order, of 40 markets, which are now "Shopping Bag ". The stores that were divested were mainly located in the foothills of the Los Angeles Basin, La Crescenta, La Canada and extended south down through this portion:.of the San Gabriel Valley. Where "Vons" had 10 stores located in this Valley, now there are 2, one in El Monte and the other in Charter Oak. Since this divesti- ture, "Vons" headquarters receives about 100 calls each week from resi- dents of this area asking the location of the nearest "Vons" market. This indicates there is a need for one of their stores in this area. The "Vons" stores located in this area are in Arcadia, Monrovia, two in Alhambra, two in Monterey Park, two in West Covina, and El Monte. They are now sending the people to El Monte. These people could be sent to this community. The general offices are on Lower Azusa and Baldwin, very IIIhear' the proposed development, and a store at this location would be a flagship store due to the proximity to the headquarters. This store would receive special treatment over all the other 72 stores. He went on that store hours would be 9 AM to 10 PM. He stated he is a resident of Temple City and present at the Dec. 21st meeting and heard the argument that delivery hours would be an inconvenience. He has since been authorized by the company to write into the record that idelivery would not be before 6 AM nor after 6 PM, and he doubted there would be deliveries before 7:30 or 8 AM because of the closeness to the distribution center. Regarding the question of the duration of the shopping visit, the normal length of stay by a customer is 20 minutes. 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 11, 1968 - page three, The housewife is annoyed to go grocery shopping and wants to leave as quickly as possible. Selection of a site is a trade secret, he con- tinued, but that they have a large staff in their real estate depart- ® ment that check out locations, and felt this was a site they needed. Regarding the upkeep of the shopping center, they maintain the inter- ior and exterior of the market, overhauling, updating and remodeling every five years. They have written into this lease that the shopping center will be cleaned daily, and the cleaning hours will be after 6 AM. Upon Commissioner Oakley's question, Mr. Davilla stated there would be no deliveries on Sunday; deliveries on Saturday only six months of the year. Commissioner Garvin asked if there was any preference of landscaping and developing of the shopping center, and Mr. Davilla answered that they feel a shopping center has to be a little better than the com- petitor down the street. They want it to look as pleasant as possible, and this is a must if they want to continue to serve the community. Mr. Robert McClellan returned to the podium stating he had overlooked something in his testimony. He presented an exhibit of the loading dock, with wall, that "Vons" suggest raising the wall to 8 ft., cover and roof over the loading and receiving area, screening along the top of the wall to roof overhang. There will be no night receiving or • loading. This will provide light and sound control besides control visually, Trash would be in there in trash containers. The only place in this center that will be affected by any spillage of parking light- ing is a draw between the two buildings and it is suggested to plant trees on 8 to 10 ft. centers, to block off any overflow of parking lot light. Mr. Richard Murphy, 5600 Heleo, stated he is a resident and home owner in the City, and spoke in favor of the zone change; the benefits far outway the personal inconvenience. This would increase the City sales tax to meet the City's needs. He felt the City needed new business, that it hadn't kept pace with other cities and we were losing tax dol- lars and the backwardness was evidenced by the limited selection of items and degree of merchandise available. Dr. ThaJ.he;Price, 9933, 35, 37 Olive, stated it was attempted to develop this property in the past as an apartment use. This land is too large for improvement of individual uses, most uses are 37 to 45 years old. Individual lots are 275 to 300 ft. deep and impossible to improve on an individual basis, and it is not economically feasible to do it. Now it •will all be razed and a first -class development built. This is in line with the Master Plan, is already C -2. He does not live in Temple City, but his parents do. He lives in Anaheim, two houses from a development similar to this. At first he was concerned about it but now he likes it. The children do most of the shopping and can walk there, they don't have to take the car. 1 Mr. Mike Kunz, 5741 N. Oak, said he lived half a block from the new Ralphs shopping center, that it will be beneficial to him as a taxpayer, that he would rather spend his money in this community than in neighbor- ing cities. Their proximity to Ralphs will not be an inconvenience. He feels this will bring business to the City. Mr. George Moore, 9924 Olive, spoke in favor of the zone change, for him self, and for Mrs. Hendrix, _9927 Howland Drive, and Mrs. Marjorie Call, 9910 Olive, who were unable to come but were in favor of it also. Mr. Anthony Van Vuren, 9933 Howland Drive, said the Manager of the Chamber said it very well, and since this was already C -2 he couldn't understand opposition, that this is a much needed development in this city. •Mrs. C. T. Nelson, 5109 Baldwin, was in favor because with the new side- walks she will be able to walk to the store. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 11, 1968- Page four Mr. Ralph Canzoneri, 9849 Olive, said he now shops at the A&P, and the City is losing tax money, that this development would definitely be good for Temple City. It will be a convenience factor. As Baldwin gets more apartments those living in them will appreciate having the ® shopping center. Mr. Merle Collins, with a business at Gracewood and Daines, spoke in favor of the zone change, that the piece of property that formerly was occupied by Schaubs should never have gone to Arcadia. IMrs. Helen Hasabales, 6156 Ivar, felt it was about time we had something like this in our community, Mrs, Lottie Manning, 9944 Olive, lives across from the proposed center and said there were many widows living here, some don't drive cars or have transportation, and they will be able to walk to the shopping center. She felt the property taxes would be lowered and property values increase. Mrs, Favor E.Fuquay, 9958 E. Olive, has four rentals and said the tenants were happy and she was too, about the shopping center. Mr. Clyde Acker, 9920 Olive, was sympathetic with those who will suffer some, but felt this is a profitable venture and will increase property values, • No one else came forward to speak in favor. Mr. Richard Nolan, 9932 Nadine Street, had several points to make in opposition. He started with the point of need as stated. He felt the need is relative to the people directly in the area, that while there are some people in favor of the center, there was evidence there are many who are incpposition. As pointed out at the last meeting, this is not a popularity contest, he continued, so he didn't secure any more signatures to back up this point. The proposed Comprehensive General IPlan depicts this location for commercial development and he felt this was putting the cart before the horse, that the General Plan should be app. -roved before approving a case predicated on the Plan being approved. Mr. Stack stated there is nothing north or south equal to the proposed center in design and scope, and Mr. Nolan agreed, because there were facilities that exceeded it in design and scope. Mr. Stack said that "V'ons" intends to be a good neighbor, and while Mr. Nolan wouldn't argue that this isn't their intent, there are several indications that their promises will not be fulfilled when the center is built. Mr. Stack stated the left -turn pockets and lights on Olive would pose no problems of ingress and egress, and regarding race -track problems Mr. Stack felt •they would resolve themselves. Mr. Nolan wanted to know how Mr. Stack's feelings could be justified when the meeting was supposed to be concerned with facts as the City Manager pointed out. Mr. Stack stated that the center would stand on its own, economically. Mr. Nolan pointed out that there are only two Gulf stations in the immediate area, and both are vacant; one is on the northeast corner of Las Tunas and Cloverly, and the other on the southwest corner of Lower Azusa and Ellis Lane. Mr. Nolan presented Exhibits 3,4, and 5, photographs of the stations, to the Commission. Mr. Stack stated there is a real need and the center will provide service, and Mr. Nolan did not argue that it will not provide service; however, there is a question if it is duplication of service of a similar type or individually operated - that contemplated were a market, laundromat, dry cleaners, barber shop, beauty shop, restaurant, drug - variety shop, and Mr. Nolan said they have similar facilities at present. It may be impossible to gain access to these proposed facilities, to begin with, because the parking will be overcrowded. With regards to parking, Mr. Stack stated the employees would be parking in the center's parking area, and Mr. Nolan felt he had evidence that this is not true. He visited recently a shopping center developed and controlled by Haagen at the northeast corner of Garvey and Jackson in •So, San Gabriel, with the intention of checking out the Chris & Pitts Restaurant there. The odor from the restaurant becomes objectionable after awhile and would be very offensive to the neighbors behind the restaurant and prevent them from enjoying their homes, and he presented Exhibits 6 and 7. This shopping center is similar to the proposed develop- ment in format, although there is no service station, Mr. Nolan continued, and presented Exhibits 8 and 9. The Chris & Pitts Restaurant is open daily until midnight. There are 144 parking spaces which is in excess PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 11, 1968 - page five of the proposed center. Mr. Nolan contacted the manager of the grocery store, and did not indicate to him if he were in favor or opposed to the center. This manager stated they had parking problems, that the employees •were required to park on the street. The developer failed to acquire two additional lots in the rear of the store as planned, evidently due to economics as is the factor in this case. Customers at the restaurant were not in- and -out customers and added to the congestion of the parking lot. If, as Mr. Goodman of the Chamber suggested, a T&J Restaurant with banquet facilities and cocktail bar is installed, Mr. Nolan felt Ithe parking problems would be compounded. Mr. Nolan felt the proposed center would contribute to the crime rate and other factors harmful to children, and he presented Exhibit 10, a Report by the President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administra- tion of Justice entitled "The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society ", dated Feb. 1967. Mr, Nolan read an excerpt from the report supporting his contention, and went on to say that there is only borderline police patrol in this city at present. He felt the large wells would lend themselves to pornographic literature and pictures by juveniles which would be seen by children. He presented Exhibits 11 and 12 containing pornography on the rear of "Vons" located at Peck and Lower Azusa, and added that this is painted over periodically and "Vons" do their best to prevent and eliminate this occurance. •Regarding loading docks and trash areas, the City Attorney stated that anything said here tonight is not binding on the developer, and Chair- man Beckman said in a zone change no conditions are made, but can be made for granting the variance and conditional use permit. Mr. Nolan went on to present Exhibit 13, showing a loading dock and trash at "Vons" at Lower Azusa and Peck Road, Exhibits 14, 15, 16 (photographs) depicting loading docks of the Haagen development at Garvey and Jackson, and these photographs, he added, did not show odor or insects. He con- cluded by saying that Mr. Stack and Mr. Goodman visited his home January 9th and tried to convince him of the benefits to the City from the center, that the property value would increase and the yearly sales tax revenue would benefit our schools. He asked if the school taxes would be re- duced and was told they would not; Mr. Goodman told him Temple City pays the highest school tax rate in the area and Mr. Nolan agreed. The tax bill, because of this one shopping center, is not going to be reduced, and if he is paying this rate for a residential section, Mr. Nolan con- cluded, he would like to have it remain residential. He felt there were other areas where the center could be located. He informed the Commission the only reason the corner is zoned C -2 is that this was done during County jurisdiction, and when the City was incorporated it continued. • If it had not been C: -2. under the County it would be R -1 now, and he felt this condition should not be perpetuated. Commissioner Garvin asked what time of day he visited these markets and was told from 12 noon to 3 PM on a Sunday, and Commissioner Garvin sug- gested that it was possible that at other times the situations would be different. Chairman Beckman asked the age of the sites visited, and Mr. Nolan informed him the South San Gabriel store was opened October 26, 1966, and didn't know the age of the others, and then submitted the photo- graphs as evidence. Mr. Tom D. Atkins, 5428 Cambury, said he lives 40 ft. from the proposed loading dock. He asked for an explanation of difference of a zone vari- ance and zone change, and Chairman Beckman explained it. He then con- tinued that when apartments wanted to go in this area the planners re- commended it be left R -1, and the public agreed. He feels a lot of money was wasted for a study of a Comprehensive General Plan and was not in favor of the zone change. Irving Baker, 9962 E. Daines, spoke against the zone change, as did Al Lindburg, 9932 E. Nadine, who read the opinion of the West San Gabriel • Valley Planning Council meeting, that commercial areas should be central- ized, and this was a program in a series by Mr. Ken Topping. He felt the business in Temple City should be encouraged, and it can't be en- couraged by spot zoning a mile away - there is room to build downtown. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 11, 1968 - page six Mr, F, E. Kinney, 9956 Daines, purchased his property two years ago with the intention of retiring, and was against the shopping center. • Mr. Fred Teeboom, 9869 E. Olive, listed services presently available. in Temple City that are being offered in the proposed shopping center, and also the markets serving the City and their relation to this area regarding distance, and felt there was no need for another shopping center or the proposed satellite store services. He works at "Space General" and encounters the racetrack traffic when homeward bound, and felt the traffic problem should be seriously considered. Mrs, Lucille Gardner, 9917 -9919 E. Howland Drive, agreed with all Mr. Nolan said, and added a survey should be made of the vacant stores up and down Las Tunas, that the City doesn't need another shopping center, and a new one would hurt existing businesses. Mr. Russ Bailey, 10030 Daines, spoke against the center because of traffic.. Mr, Robert Montgomery, 5504 N. Robinhood, corner of Robinhood it Daines, felt that something should be done about the bottleneck situation on his street, and that this was very germain to the case. Mr. Walter Schinnerer, 5319 Baldwin, felt this service station wouldn't • increase property values one bit. He took a count of the traffic on Baldwin at certain hours at the proposed center site, and read off the figures to show the traffic situation there. 1 Mr. A. L. Giordano, 10112 Landseer St., felt this center would hurt com- petitors and that another grocery store was not needed. Mr. Larry Reed, 9922 E. Nadine, was concerned about the traffic on Olive, and especially during the racing season. He, too, was against the pro- posed development. Rita Polek, 9819 Nadine, was in oppostion. because of the increase in traf- fic, Her children play at Live Oak Park, must cross Baldwin, and this would add to the hazards of their going to the park to play. Mr. Larry Reed, 9922 E. Nadine, returned to the podium to state that the signals on Baldwin which are set for 10 seconds are that way for 24 hours a day, not just during the racing hours. Mr. Tom Edwards, 9919 Howland Drive, didn't agree that the proposed center would bring people to Temple City to shop, and questioned the distances • from other shopping centers. Chairman Beckman stated he had personally clocked the distance in his car and it was 1 -1/2 miles to the Midway Shop- ping Center. Mr. Frank Price, 9933 Olive, stated when he asked for a variance for his property there was no statement that this would be permanently R -1, and the-Planning Commission recommended that all this property should be put together as a unit for a zone change. Mr. Atkins addressed the Commis- sion that this was his suggestion, and to the City Council. There being no one else to speak in opposition the Chairman asked if Mr. Stack wished to take this time for rebuttal, and Mr. Stack declined. Mr. Larry Reed asked whether the T &J Restaurant was to be part of the center, and Mr. Stack replied it is being considered, as well as Chris & Pitts, Mr. Reed wondered if the T&J would be the same operation as the one in Rosemead with bar and banquet facilities. Mr. Stack said he was not aware of the consideration being given to T &J. Chairman Beck- man said that a bar wouldn't be allowed, that a conditional use permit would have to be obtained, and there is no consideration in this applica- tion for a bar. 1 Commissioner Garvin moved to close the public hearing, and it was second- ed by Commissioner Oakley and so moved. Chairman Beckman called for a 10 minute recess. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 11, 1968 - page seven. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Beckman at 9:40 P.M. Commissioner Oakley stated he was particularly concerned with the zoning • request, in view of the fact that the City does not yet have the revised General Plan to indicate other development around the possible C -2 zone, The neighborhood has some traffic problems now and compounding them is another consideration. He, too, is particularly concerned with the down- town district, and is encouraged by the Ralphs center and the malls and would not want to detract from its further development. Commissioner Millham said he lives close to the proposed center and tried not to let this affect his thinking, but to look at it from the community standpoint. He feels in time Baldwin Av, will be one of the main arteries between the San Bernardino and Foothill Freeway, The proposed overlay of our General Plan will see Baldwin Ave, develop into commercial and high - rise area. He has tried to consider the position of each of the property owners in this area, and also what is in the best interest of the commun- ity, and whether this would affect business in the downtown area of the City. The City needs new facilities and new business to forestall any property tax to help meet expenses of the development of the City. Commissioner Lawson was in sympathy ;with the property owners, what they might be faced with here and also looked at what is best for the property owners other than those adjoining the shopping center. He believes that • the interest of the City as a whole would be better served with a shopp- ing center such as this. 1 1 1 • Commissioner Garvin referred strictly to use regarding change of zone, that in time Baldwin Ave. will definitely need a commercial type develop- ment and a natural place for it is at an intersection of this type. Bald- win Ave, eventually will have garden -type apartments which will be best served by a commercial center. He felt that while there are other mar- kets in the surrounding area, none will offer services equal to this one. He added it was unfortunate there was no buffer zone existing between this and the R -1 property, that this problem was not created by this Planning Commission but that the pattern has been formed for a long time. Changing it to upgrade, not for today or tomorrow, but for 20 years, there will be problems and we have to live with some of these problems. He feels there is a need on Baldwin Ave. for a development of some kind and this seems like the logical thing. Chairman Beckman concurred, adding that traffic was one of the problems, especially from the race track, but this will always exist as long as that racetrack operates in Arcadia. Because Baldwin has a 100 -ft. right - of -way like Rosemead Blvd., in the future he felt it would become similar to Rosemead. He pointed out the difference between a downtown area type of shopping center and a neighborhood shopping center, that the downtown area attracts a different type of store and is a different classification and has different shops. Neighborhood shopping center is good planning when done properly and properly controlled. This is not strip zoning, but what exists there now is strip zoning. Some very serious considera- tion should be given to some form of buffer zone and zoning on Baldwin or it will end up like Rosemead with lots too small for residential. He then suggested that the variance case be heard before a decision be made on the zone change. Commissioner Garvin so moved, and it was seconded by Commissioner Oakley and passed unanimously. 50 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE VARIANCE CASE NO. 67 -243 Alexander Haagen, Agent for Owners 5505 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, Calif, Site: 5405 thru 5429 N. Baldwin Ave., (W. Side) 9933 thru 9945 E. Olive Street (N, Side) " 1 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 11, 1968 - Page eight Chairman Beckman announced that this was a continued public hearing, and asked the Planning Director if he had any additional information. Planning ,Director Dragicevich presented Revised. Exhibit "C" which is sub- mitted by the developer for tonight's hearing and then he referred to Exhibit "A" proposed by the developer on December 21st, the last hearing. The difference between "A" and "C" lies in several technical features. Proposed and suggested for change was the parking area adjacent to the drugstore building. Now the parking spaces are on an angle which will help traffic circulation, but in so doing the developer lost one parking space - originally there were 5 and now there are 4. The second item is the dimension of the proposed site which was a technical error on the first exhibit; instead 'of 324 ft. it showed 319 ft., which added 1500 sq. ft. to the proposed site. Another item of interest is the driveway approach on Olive. Exhibit "A" shows the driveway 22 ft. from the corner; the revised exhibit shows it 52 ft. from the corner. Commissioner Millham asked how far the approach is from the Baldwin side and was told it was 22 ft. Mr. Stack was asked to speak for the applicant on this case, and reviewed the three items of the variance;number and size of parking stalls, height and size of sign. His understanding was that the staff recommended the height of the sign be restricted to 35 ft. which is in accordance with the City ordinance, and the applicant concurred. Applicant has also concurred to reduce the size of the sign to 50 ft. Regarding the number and size of the parking stalls, Mr. Stack called Mr. McClellan to the podium. Mr. McClellan of Ainsworth and McClellan, Architects, stated they had con- siderable experience in planning shopping centers in California, and found that the number of cars within an effective distance (about 200 ft.) from the doorway, is the real criteria when establishing a parking lot. This is not just "Vons" opinion, but that of several major market chains and major department store chains, and they believe 130 stalls will be per- fectly adequate. He mentioned other market centers now in operation, all with comparable size, that had less parking and no problem, even on open- ing day, that people shop at all hours during the day. Commissioner Oakley was concerned about the north and west walls being plain concrete of light color reflecting on the residences adjacent. He felt some architectural treatment or brick, or aggregate finish, that would be permanent, could be applied. Mr. McClellan said he felt he could speak for the developer that he would be willing to go to textured con- crete and color, although this would be an added expense. Commissioner Oakley asked if he would object to having this written into the conditions " of the zone variance,to which Mr. McClellan stated he had no objections. Commissioner Oakley asked if it was the developer's intent to include the new exhibit of the depressed driveway, 8 ft. wall, roofed area and plant- ing on the property line as part of the site plan, and Mr. McClellan said yes. Regarding the size and width of the parking stalls, Mr. McClellan again referred to his company's experience in planning many centers, plus their relationship with the major tenant and the accepted standard parking stall width is 9 ft. If any of the major chains felt this was an in- convenience to the shopper, who is king, they would require wider stalls. Commissioner Oakley referred to the parking layout, why, in coming off Baldwin,a person must turn right into a stall, and Mr. McClellan explained they didn't want to allow people to cross oncoming traffic. He explained it is almost impossible to control one- or two -way traffic in parking. Commissioner Garvin referred to the quoted statistics of other shopping centers Mr. McClellan's company developed, and asked if these centers had the same type of satellite stores, including restaurant, and Mr. McClellan said some do and some don't. Commissioner Garvin said the type of satellite stores governs the number of parking stalls, and when it is said 100 -plus spaces are acceptable to "Vons" is this taking into consideration the type of satellite stores and businesses going in with 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 11, 1968 - page nine the development? If the satellites use up 80 spaces this leaves "Vons" with about 50. He asked what was the normal number for a market of this type, and Mr. McClellan said "Vons" figured they could live with 90 minimum. w"Vons" is the major draw and the shopper coming to the center 90% of the time is coming to the market. Commissioner Garvin replied that if the shopper goes to any satellite stores and market it will take more than 20 minutes, or if that shopper also goes to the laundromat it will take longer. If "Vons" takes 90 spaces, and 15 to 20 cars for the restaurant, the rest of the satellite stores have few spaces. Mc. McClellan said this can be . figured in different dnrays and you couldn't say it was right or wrong. Mr. McClellan, in answer to Commissioner Garvin's question, stated the parking area could be double - striped, and usually is. For the record Com- missioner Garvin stated he considered the 9 ft. parking stalls inadequate for today's cars. Chairman Beckman asked if the applicant or Mr. McClellan could give a ratio of other comparable centers with regards to square footage and park- ing. Mr. McClellan listed the following: Alpha Beta Market and shops at. Santa Monica and Fairfax, 45,700 sq. ft. and 120 cars; Foodfair Market and small shops in Bellgarden, 28,500 sq. ft., 128 cars; Alpha Beta and small shops, 26,700 sq. ft. and 86 cars; in the last mentioned center the market had only 19,000 sq. ft. The center in Cheviot Hills had 50,000' sq. ft., and 130 parking stalls. • Mr. Stack added, in conjunction with the subject of the zone variance on parking stalls, the number of employees in the shopping center had been broken down as follows: "Vons" - 15 on a normal shift; cleaners -1; shoe repair-1; barber shop-2; beauty shop-2; drugstore -4; restaurant,5; coin laundry - none; for a total of 30. In an area such as Temple City employees working in the center many of them will live in the near vicinity and will walk to work. "Vons" has 22 employees in their administrative offices alone who live in Temple City. It is very common and it is presumed that Ithere will be, in a shopping center, pool riding. He explained the differ -, ence between a regional shopping center and a neighborhood shopping center; a person can go to a neighborhood shopping center several times in a day but doesn't stay very long - they get in and out quickly, and are within a reasonable distance from home. In a downtown shopping or regional shopping center people can spend all day. Here they don't stay very long - - a 20 minute turnover. This is the way most neighborhood shopping centers work. Commissioner Garvin asked if he was familiar with the center at Garvey and Jackson, and Mr. Stack replied yes, and that there was about 40,00Q sq. ft. in their buildings. Commissioner Oakley asked if Mr. Stack was in a position at this time to state this center would be built as shown and Mr. Stack said this is how it would be built, this is the concept, worked out with "Vons" and the architects out of many concepts. It will be as presepted with slight variations as the Commission pointed out, if approval is obtained. Com- missioner Oakley asked if he would object to having it so stated in the variance that it must look like this, and Mr. Stack answered he had no objections. No one else came to speak in favor. In opposition Mrs. Geraldine Moreno, 6219 Golden West, and who owns prop- erty at 5435 Baldwin, did some research of the parking conditions at Alpha Beta, Clark Drugs and at the Golden. West Shopping Center, and her findings were that the parking was often inadequate and the employees were forced to park somewhere else. During the peak hours and during peak days and the Christmas season the parking was particularly critical,. Mr. Tom D. Atkins, 5428 N. Cambury Ave., stated it was pretty apparent that there would be on- street parking, and he wanted to know if any provision was made for sidewalks, especially on narrow streets such as Olive, for PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 11, 1968 - page ten people who would be forced out into the street around parked cars. The City Manager replied the immediate vicinity of the site would have side- walks as part of the plan. On Baldwin there has been considerable side- 411 walk work and more will be put in as residents require. Mr. Atkins asked if this would include Cambury, and the City Manager answeredit was not considered a major safety factor on Cambury to require sidewalks. Mr. Richard Nolan asked if the official zoning map on display was accur- ate and was informed it was not. He asked where there was an official zoning map, and the Planning Director said in the Zoning Ordinance book. Mr. Nolan said that only showed existing zoning and he wanted to see a copy of the proposed Master Plan. The Planning Director showed him the General Plan map in the proposed General Plan book. He said that the corner is slated for commercial development in the proposed Master Plan. It was recommended as R -3; that is the existing zoning, Mr. Nolan stated he had checked "Vons" parking lot in El Monte on a Sun- day afternoon, where there were no shops and 211 parking stalls, and found the parking lot almost full or occupied with shopping carts and many cars taking up double spaces. A similar situation exists at Garvey and Jackson where the employees are required to park their cars on the street, and this is a Haagen development, and if they lacked foresight there he wondered if they had gained so much more insight in planning parking for this center in one year. That center is 47,000 sq. ft., • which is 7000 ft. less than here. He went on that Mr. Stack and Mr. Goodman of the Temple City Chamber of Commerce came to their homes and stated categorically that there was sufficient parking, and also stated that a housewife would not go more than 190 to 200 ft. from her car to a market door to shop. He pointed out that if a woman had a beauty shop appointment, she would probably park on the street if the lot were full, in order to keep that appoint- ment. With regard to the possible T&J Restaurant and the banquet facili- ties of which Mr. Goodman is so proud, if he had tickets for a banquet and the lot were filled would he be apt to go elsewhere? And did the developer check the T. &J in Rosemead or a similar development for park- ing? If they go by Mr. Goodman's statements, this is going to be quite a busy banquet facility because there is no other such facility in Temple City, and will be a boon for clubs and organizations in the area. He then mentioned that Traffic Engineer Envall said measures can be taken to insure movement of traffic on Olive, that 40 ft. width on this street is adequate, that there could be no stopping permitted on Olive on either side or both sides of the street, with an addition of a lane. If this is done and no parking is allowed on Olive shoppers will use other • residential side streets such as Cambury; traffic on Olive will increase and so will danger to children. Crosswalks provide some protection. Those who go to Cloverly school ride their bikes, and can't stay on the curbs or sidewalks. The signals that are modified to allow 10 seconds and pedestrian time is not sacrificed or reduced; however, one must push the button to cross, and unless a person knows this, he will go on a green light only to be caught in traffic in the middle of the street, particularly if the person is a stranger to the intersection. He consid- ered the traffic control at this intersection, which must have been approved by the Traffic Dept., as poor traffic control because of the necessity to trip a signal in order to proceed. He concluded his argument by stating that a variance should not be granted, according to the ordinance book, if it is injurious to the enjoyment of the property owners of their owrr property, and this has an effect on the zone change, very much in conjunc- tion. He asked that the Planning Commission consider this fact before making a decision on either case. Commissioner Millham asked how many parking spaces were at the center at Garvey and Jackson and was told there were 144. Chairman Beckman asked about the bus service to the schools, and was told III there was service at La Rosa but not Cloverly; children ride their bikes the entire length of Olive across Temple City Boulevard, but do not go up Temple City Boulevard. 1 " 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 11, 1968 - page eleven Mr, Larry Reed, 9922 Nadine, spoke about inadequate parking for "Vons" and its satellite stores, particularly since there will be included a beauty shop, where a woman can spend from 22 to 4hours. It takes more than 20 minutes in a barber shop,and there can be as many as 7 to 8 customers there. The figures he and Mr. Nolan quoted were facts ob- tained from a shopping center almost identical to the proposed one ex- cept for the service station. They have more space and still have a problem. They have more employees - all the time, not just peak hours. He suggested if this were to be a first -class development that more property be purchased for parking as most people will come to the center in cars. Mr. Robert Hood, liquor store at Baldwin and Olive, was very concerned about the parking for the proposed center which he felt inadequate. Mr. James Baldwin, 9814 Callita, Temple City, resident and developer, said he was not here to speak for or against. He looked at the render- ings and had serious doubt about a lot of things - he said it is not enough to grant this and say it has to conform to the rendering. He was concerned about the facade on the sides of the building facing Olive. He felt there should be a more "village -y" look to the center to conform to the area. He stated that in Alhambra where they just had a large project approved, any project over a certain amount of money, the develop, er has to submit to the Commission elevations from all four sides of the " building. He felt that pornographic problems could be largely eliminated by the use of rough brick or stone. He also felt a preliminary land- scaping plan should have been submitted. Chairman Beckman explained that they must submit a landscaping plan and sprinkling system to the City for approval. 1 Mr. Patrick A. Curran, 9939 Nadine, spoke against the variance, that if he had wanted to live in a commercial area he would have bought near one. Chairman Beckman asked if Mr. Stack would care to submit rebuttal, since there was no one else to speak in opposition. Mr. Stack declined, rest- ing his case- on facts presented thus far. Commissioner Oakley felt Mr. Baldwin had a few good points and he too would like to see the building look well on all four sides, to have a roof line and not just parapet wall. Mr. Stack replied they will supply other elevations and particular finishes. Commissioner Millham asked Mr. Stack if he felt the property is unique, and Mr. Stack said yes, from the standpoint that it is located on a major boulevard, that the services for this area are being provided by other communities; the location of Baldwin and Olive within the physical geography of Temple City is unusual in location too. City Attorney Flan - drick referred him to Section 9201 in the Zoning Ordinance, and Mr. Stack continued that the parking variance they are requesting he felt was a fair one because he felt the parking they are supplying is sufficient to do the job; the major tenant feels it is sufficient. Commissioner Garvin asked if the loading area off Olive was restricted for just the drugstore, and was told that it is also for market loading, but the main loading for the market was on the other side. Commissioner Gar- vin asked if it would change their plans to restrict it to the drugstore only. Mr. Stack referred the question to Mr. McClellan, who stated it could be done, but not usual to restrict all loading for "Vons" in this manner. Commissioner Garvin said his main concern was large vehicles, and Mr. McClellan stated that this loading area was not built to handle the large vans - they would be serviced at the other side. If this were to become a restriction and condition of the variance he would have to discuss it with "Vons ". Commissioner Garvin asked about.the trash area on the north side, if it serviced only the satellite shops and not "Vons", and was told that "Vons" " trash would be under cover. Commissioner Garvin was concerned that, if there were three rigs parked there, the trash couldn't be picked up, and Mr. McClellan informed him that there would never be three rigs there at one time. Mr. McClellan pointed out there was a 6x15 trash area for the satellite shops. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 11, 1968 - page twelve Commissioner Garvin asked how many uses are proposed for the satellite building. Mr. Stack replied they are not in a position to negotiate for tenants in the satellite shops until the project is almost completed,' and he listed the possible tenants as a beauty shop, barber shop, laundrp- mat, shoe repair shop, cleaner, and restaurant. Commissioner Garvin asked how many shops there would be, that he couldn't vote on the variance unless he knew what is going to go into these buildings, that the type of tenants would have a direct bearing on the parking. He said at the last meeting a certain size restaurant was described, and if a larger restaurant were to be a tenant the parking required would take away from "Vohs" parking. Mr. Stack replied that since "Vons" is the major tenant they would not have another tenant in the satellite stores that would hamper "Vons" opera- tion. Chairman Beckman suggested controlling the number of stores. Mr. Alexander Haagen, '..:5505 :Wilshire-Blvd., L.A. , .took the podium and stated that it is impossible to lease space until at least the plans are completed. He said he is willing to limit the square footage of the restaurant. They are not going to put in a large restaurant there; are under strict surveillance of the major tenant. Tenants cannot handle liquor, dairy or food products or use parking in competition with the major tenant. Normally there would not be more than six or seven shops c;.:; there and he stated they were willing to limit the number of stores if so desired. • Chairman Beckman felt it would be wise to limit the size of the restaur- ant. Commissioner Garvin stated that the Ralphs Center plans showed the number of shops. Mr. Haagen stated that they have a record of 100% leased and operated shops, they have been talking to good tenants and hope they will come to this center. 1 Mr. Larry Reed wanted to know if it wasn't determined how many shops or their size, how could the number of parking stalls be determined? Es- pecially since this is a borderline case of parking space. Mr. Haagen replied he disagreed that there will not be adequate parking; he added that not one million, but several million, dollars will be invested here. Commissioner Oakley moved the public hearing be closed, and it was second- ed by Commissioner Millham and so moved. Commissioner Garvin said the development as proposed did not satisfy him. The number of parking spaces and size are inadequate, this is 30% below what it should be; Ralphs parking was only 19% below. Parking is pro - posed without knowing how many buildings in the satellite operation, es- pecially if a large restaurant goes in. The service station in the mid- dle is taking up a lot of space; parking is less than required and sub- standard in width. Commissioner Lawson concurred with Commissioner Garvin, that there should be more parking spaces here, instead of 187 it is proposed to have 130. He felt the size, 9x20, was not objectionable. Commissioner Millham agreed with Commissioner Lawson that 9 x 20 was suf ficient in this case, but agreed with Commissioner Garvin that they should know how many stores will be in the satellite area to know whether re- duced parking is adequate. Commissioner Oakley felt 9x20 size was all right, but if the variance is granted he would be interested in adding several requirements or condi- tions, such as an 8 ft, high wall; covering over delivery on the north; planting on the north; exposed colored aggregate surface or other speci- fic material such as brick to greatly reduce glare to the residential properties on all sides; buildings generally must look as shown; submit all elevations for final approval, specifically with regard to the roof line, parapets, overhang, to make them look from the residential sides much as they look from the front, not including windows; and limit the restaurant to 4,000 sq. ft. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 11, 1968 - page thirteen Chairman Beckman concurred that there should be a limitation on the size of the restaurant and number of shops. Our present ordinance specifies parking be related to the square footage of shops; the applicant is ask- IIIing for a variance because the type of shops will not require as much parking, He agreed that it was difficult to get tenants before the mar- ket is built as that might be another year. Major tenant has the control - he approves satellite tenants. He stated he had visited a number of shopp- ing centers and agrees with the applicant that he would not walk more than 200 ft, from his car to the market door. If "Vons ", the major tenant, is satisfied that this parking is adequate, they would be in a position to know. Commissioner Oakley wished another condition inserted - that the parking lot lighting not exceed 16 ft, in height. Chairman Beckman stated in a previous case that it was required that landscaping and the lighting plan be approved by the staff, Commissioner Garvin asked that consideration be given to double striping of the parking lot rather than single; that the loading area at the rear of the drugstore service the drugstore only; the satellite building specified for the drugstore be used for nothing but the drugstore. City Attorney Flandrick instructed that a restriction could be put in the variance that the market building be used only as a market, a drugstore building be used only as a drugstore, etc., and if there develops a III problem after a couple years the applicant could come back and ask for a modification. 1 Chairman Beckman declared a 10 minute break at this time, and called the meeting to order again at 11:35 PM, 6, CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 67 -244 Alexander Haagen, Agent for Owners 5505 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles Site: 5409 thru 5429 N. Baldwin Ave. (W, Side) 9933 thru 9945 E. Olive St, (N. Side) Chairman Beckman explained that this was a continued public hearing, and that at the meeting of Dec. 21st the applicant was asked to submit cor- rected renderings of the station. He then asked if the Planning Director had anything to add. Planning Director Dragicevich presented Revised Exhibit "C ", showing 5 parking spaces to the north of the service station building. Applicant also shows access driveway on Olive shifted from the corner 52 ft. Also shown is canopy extended and the block wall as proposed 5 ft. in height. The maps labeled C -3A and C -3B show elevations and views from the north, Baldwin, Olive and West. He referred the Commission to another render- ing which illustrated the same points, only in color. He went on that the applicant also proposed a change in the height of the free - standing sign. Proposed and shown on the previous map was 27 ft., now is to be 20 ft. Mr. Fred Westover representing the Gulf Oil Co,, came to the podium, and said he felt the new renderings had captured the general feelings of the Commission at the last meeting including the treatment of the overhang of the canopy, the front wall to block the view of pumps from Baldwin. Commissioner Oakley asked about the building material proposed for the station and was told it is a metal building with facia the same material as "Vons ". The wall can be any type of material, There was considerable discussion about the renderings, and the height of the sign. Commissioner Garvin suggested, with the height of the building being 16 ft., the banjo sign 20 ft,, to leave the emblems off the canopy. Mr. Westover replied that the canopy signs are a trademark emblem not to extend over the roof • line of the canopy. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 1 1 , 1968 - page fourteen Mr. Westover explained the reason for the two Gulf stations in Temple City being closed - the one lost its lease, and the other was selling • and repairing motorcycles in violation of the City's zoning code, and chose to move elsewhere in Temple City where this operation, in con - junction with a gas station, was legal. in answer to a question from the audience he explained that the storage tanks would be located to the side of the pumps and their service trucks would not take up park- ing space while filling the tanks, The filling procedure would be done in the early morning or mid - afternoon, but not during peak hours, Com- missioner Garvin explained that on the checklist the Commission follows on service stations, deliveries shall be confined to the hours of 7 AM to 10 PM, The Planning Director inserted at this point that the highest point of the station was 17 ft,, not 16, for the record. Commissioner Garvin continued that all business activities, including delivery, ex- cept servicing of gas and oil, shall be confined between 7 AM to 9 PM, There being no one else to speak in favor of the case, and no more ques- tions, the Chairman asked if there was anyone in opposition. Mr. Tom D. Atkins, 5428 N, Cambury Ave., Temple City, stated he had been in the service station business, and found that the traffic from the racetrack did not greatly increase his business. His main opposition was that the large gasoline trucks would have a difficult time getting in and out of the center, 1 1 There being no one else to speak in opposition Commissioner Garvin moved to close the public hearing, and it was seconded by Commissioner Oakley and so moved. Commissioner Oakley felt that Gulf Oil has indicated what the Commission wanted, a station with character. He was in favor of two signs,one on each side, a 20 ft, high banjo sign, but was opposed to the exit on the corner, facing Baldwin, However, if the Commission is happy with the presentation as shown and discussed, he would like to add conditions from the service station checklist in reference to signs and driveway approaches. Cornmissioner Garvin was concerned with the solid masonry wall in front of the restrooms and felt it should be decorative and with visibility such as lace block, as a crime preventative, Commissioner Lawson felt that (referring to staff recommendation No, 19 in the factual report) the lighting fixtures should be compatible with the other shopping center fixtures. There was some discussion of the type of lighting required for a gas station and that for the rest of the parking lot, and it was determined that no lighting fixtures should ex- ceed 16 ft., and should be compatible throughout the center. Commissioner Garvin questioned the staff recommendation No, 7, the plant- ing, if there was a restriction on the height and the Planning Director referred him to staff recommendation No, 21. Commissioner Garvin would like the wall in front of the restrooms to be decorative, and the light- ing limited to 16 ft, fixtures. He was in favor of the 20 ft, high banjo sign and the emblem on the wall on Baldwin he felt was ample to identify the product and could see no reason for decals or emblems on the canopy, and staff recommendations as listed. Chairman. Beckman concurred with the Commissioners, that this was what we were trying to accomplish. This was the reason service stations were put under Conditional Use Permit and why there is a check list, He pre- ferred stations in shopping centers as this, rather than on a corner, Chairman Beckman then suggested going back to Case 67 -242, the Zone Change, and voting, as he didn't want to see the service station approved unless the zone change was approved, The Commission was referred to Item 4 on the agenda. • Cornmissioner Garvin moved to recommend to the City Council a change in zone from the present zoning of to C -2 for subject property. It was seconded by Commissioner Millham, A roll call vote was taken as follows: 1 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 1 1 , 1968 - - page fifteen AYES: Commissioners: Garvin, Lawson, Millham, Beckman NOES: Commissioners: Oakley ABSENT: Commissioners: None Commissioner Oakley stated as his reason for dissent was that not enough information was presented as to whether this center should go in this area. In the variance discussion the parking, and traffic were big items, and he was not sure in his own mind that this was in the best interest of Temple City. Chairman Beckman referred the Commission to Zone Variance Case No. 67 -243, Item 5 on the evening's agenda. He asked for a motion that would contain all the conditions as specified in the staff report, and with the aid of the Commission and the City Attorney, it would also include limiting the size of the restaurant portion of the satellite building to 3500 -4000 sq. ft.; storage, trash and delivery areas be screened and the wall behind them increased_to 8 ft.; double striping of parking lot; limitation to 16 ft. on the height of the lighting fixtures, planing on the north; exposed colored aggregate surface or other such specific material to greatly reduce glare to residential properties on all sides; buildings must look as shown; submit all elevations for final approval; specific- ally with regard to roof lines, eaves, overhang, to make them look from the residential sides much as they look from the front. It was deter- mined that screening the air conditioning and mechanical apparatus on the roof was covered by the zoning ordinance. Included by Commissioner Garvin was the condition that hours of delivery be restricted to 6 AM to 6 PM. Chairman Beckman explained that land- scaping and lighting should be substantially as described; the proposed sign should be 35 ft. in height; it was stated that condition No. 13 could be eliminated. Commissioner Oakley moved the variance be granted with conditions as stated, and Commissioner Millham seconded. A roll call vote was taken as follows: AYES: Commissioners: Millham, Oakley, Beckman NOES: Commissioners: Garvin, Lawson Chairman Beckman declared that the Resolution covering the variance would be prepared by the City Attorney and presented at the next meeting of the Planning Commission for approval, stating all the conditions, and at that time would be voted on. He also announced the right of appeal after adoption of the resolution. Chairman Beckman announced the Commission would now consider a motion on the Conditional Use Permit Case No. 67 -244, Item No. 6 on the agenda. City Attorney Flandrick stated that, in addition to the staff recommenda- tions, the Commission had requested a decorative screen wall in front of the restroom doors, trash area covered and attached to wall, 20 ft. high sign, outdoor lighting to be compatible to rest of center. Commissioner Oakley was against the access driveway on Baldwin and the City Manager pointed out this is the same plan as at several other stations in this area, that the racetrack traffic problem exists only for a part of the year, that Baldwin is not as busy as Rosemead where some of the mentioned stations were located. Commissioner Oakley also stated that the service station check list required a 150 ft. lot width, and this was only 125, and with reduced parking this would all compound the problem. Commis- sioner Millham and Oakley, as well as Chairman Beckman, felt that the two trademark signs on the canopy, but no higher than the canopy, would not detract from the service station. Commissioner Oakley moved that the Conditional Use Permit be granted, sub- ject to all the discussion, including elimination of the driveway on 0 Baldwin, decorative screen wall by restroom doors, lighting 16 ft. high, two trademark signs per check list and substantially as shown on the plot plan and elevations and including all that the "Gulf" representative PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 11, 1968 - page sixteen indicated for the various vertical planes indicated. Commissioner Lawson seconded, and a roll call vote was taken as follows: • AYES: Commissioners: Lawson, Millham, Oakley, Beckman 1 1 NOES: Commissioners: Garvin Chairman Beckman announced that any interested citizen or the applicant had the right to appeal the decision or any of the conditions to the City Council within 20 days after the adoption of the Resolution, and that the Resolution would be prepared and adopted at the next regular Planning Commission meeting. City Attorney Flandrick read Resolution 68-282,-RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY GRANTING ZONE CHANGE IN ZONE CHANGE CASE CASE NO. 67 -242. Commissioner Millham moved to waive further read- ing and adopt and Commissioner Oakley seconded, and it was so moved. 7. OLD BUSINESS The Planning Director referred the Commission to the Resolution for Con- ditional Use Permit 67 -241, case on the commercial- recreational use, which was ready for reading and adoption. Commissioner Garvin stated he had not had a chance to read it, and the other Commissioners agreed, and action was postponed until the next regular meeting. Planning Director Dragicevich called the Commission's attention to the proposed amendment to the ordinance on car wash establishments, that the City Council had referred it back to the Planning Commission for review and comments. The Planning Commission felt they had not had a chance to review it, and would like to study it, and preferred not to take ac- tion on it this evening. It was determined by the Commission, in reply to Commissioner Garvin's question, that the next study session would be January 25th. 9. TIME FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO SPEAK Mr. Alexander Haagen thanked the Commission for their considera- tion and time at this late hour. 10. MATTERS FROM CITY OFFICIALS - None. 11. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Garvin moved the meeting be adjourned to the next regular meeting of the. Planning Commission on January 23, 1968. It was seconded by Commissioner Oakley and so move•. The meeting ad* urned at 12:45 AM. Secretary