HomeMy Public PortalAboutA1988-05-17 CITY COUNCIL ` ��
�� ` , : �: . ` !! ,�
�'"t "�Kk:�'�r�i v-."�'SaP� � �.'�'4`'�.ii�. ,.`�s-�+':$:��"s
a
d �l/ I �" F
R�.:E6�lE� I .
CITY Of LYNWOOD
CITY CL[R{CS OFFlCE
SPEC I AL PRE-COUNC I L WOKSHOP MAY 16 1988
TO BE HELD ON MAY 17, 1988 AA9 P�A
IN THE COtJfERENCE ROOM "di8�9i10i11i12i1i2�3i4i5i6
7:00 P.M. �
� �
, 1 �'
PAUL H. RICHARDS, II
MAYOR
LOUIS HEINE E. L. MORRIS
MAYOR PRO-TEM COUNCILPERSON
ROBERT HENNItdG EVELYN WELLS
COUNCILPERSON COUNCILWOMAN
CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY
CHARLES G. GOMEZ HENRY BARBOSA
CITY TREASURER CITY CLERY.
MARY L. WRIGHT ANDREA L. HOOPER
1. Discussion of agenda items posted for the regular Council Meeting to begin
at 7:3�•
I
i
�
I
�
I
I
I
(
I
I
. �
I ' ;I
t� �p,� ,
� • e
� ii C�t,3' Of �YNWOOD PAUL . RICHARDS, II, Mayor
���' �1 Ctty �Ueeting CI�bQQee9es ��, �yEL WE A Mayor PraTem
� ��^` ;'�� oun�l Members
� 11330 BULLIS ROaD �� �' � E� pHN D. BVORK
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 2 CiT OF LYNWdOD R BERT HENNING
(213) 603-0220 C17Y C�,�,�jlhS OFFICF�' E. L. MORRIS
MAY ?- 3 1988 p �
AM
7 i 8 i 9 i l0�lli12i1i 2 � 3 i 4 i 3 � 6 .
IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE CITY COUNCIL BUSZNESS, WE ASR� THAT ALL
PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL FILL OUT A FORM PROVIDED
AT THE DOOR, AND TO TURN IT IN TO THE�CIT'Y CLERK PRIOR TO �E
START OF THE MEETING OR BEFORE 7:45 �M. FAILURE TO FILL T
SUCH A FORM WILL PROHIBIT YOU FROM ADDR�SSING THE COUNCIL IN THE
ABSENCE OF THE UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF THE COUNCIL.
AGENDA ITEMS ON FILE FOR CONSIDERATION
AT THE MEETING OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL
TO BE HELD ON MAY 17, 1988
IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:30 P.M.
PAUL H. RICHARDS II
MAYOR
LOUIS HEINE � E. L. MDRRIS
MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCILPERSON
ROBERT HENNZNG EVELYN WELLS
COUNCILPERSON COUNCILPERSON
CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY
CHARLES G. GOMEZ HENRY BARBOSA
CITY TREASURER CITY CLERK
MP.RY L. WRIGHT ANDREA L. HOOPER
OPENING CEREMONIES
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. INVOCATION - REV. L. C. PHILLIPS
wORD OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CENTER
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. ROLL CALL OF COUNCIL MEMBERS
Louis Heine
Robert Henning
E. L. Morris
Evelyn Wells
Paul H. Richards II
5. CERTIFICAT30N OF AGENDA POSTING BY THE CITY CLERK
1 .
��
� �
. CITY COUNCIL,MEETING OF MAY 17, 1988
6. MINUTES �OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS: None
, 1
7, PROCLAMATION: ,
' ` Correct Posture Month - May, 1488
` 8. COUNCIL.RECESS TO: LYNWOOD REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
(Regarding Agenda Items Only)
SCHEDULED MATTERS
9. PUBLIC HEARING: APPROVAL OF RENTAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM
DESCRIPTION AND ACTIVITIES FOR THE 1988-89 PROGRAM YEAR
Comments:
The City expects to receive $61,000 in HUD Rental
Rehabilitation Program funds for the 1988-89 Program Year.
HUD requires .that at least one public hearing be held to ,
obtain citizens' comments.
Recommendation:
Staff requests that Council adopt the attached resolution
approving the Rental Rehabilitation program description after
� consideration of citizen input received during May 17th
public hearing.
10. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) APPLICATION FOR THE
198$-89 PROGRAM YEAR
Comments:
, The City's 1988-89 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
funds are:
� 1988-89 Entitlement Allocation $ 1,109,009
Reprogrammed from prior years 1,826,283 _
Program Income (Projected) 50,000
� TOTAL $ 2,985,292
The. City is required to hold at least one public hearing on
' the proposed activities and City Council approval is required
prior to submission of the 1988-89 Grant Application. .
2
��
: � �
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1988
Recommendation:
Staff requests that City Council:
a) Make funding decisions regarding 1988-89 CDBG public
service projects;
b) Conduct a public hearing.to obtain. citizen input on
proposed use of funds; and
c) Adopt the attached Resolution approving the Statement of
Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for the 1988-89
Program year.
11. PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO REGULATE HELISTOPS - CASE NO. 88008
Comments :
Proposed amendment to Chapter 25, the Official Zoning
Ordinance, pertaining to development for helistops in
conjunction with the construction of new facilities in the
City.
Recommendation:
Waive readinq and introduce the proposed ordinance.
12. PROPOSED AMENDMENT T0 CHAPTER 25, THE OFFICIAL ZONING
ORDINANCE, MODIFYING CURRENT DENSITY BONUS PROVISIONS
Commentsc
Proposed amendment to Chapter 25, the Official Zoning
Ordinance, to allow density bonuses of only twenty-five (250)
percent •above the basic density in the R-2 and R-3 (Multiple
Family Residential) zones.
Recommendation:
Waive reading and introduce the proposed ordinance.
CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar will be acted upon
' by one Motion affirming the action recommended on the agenda.
There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to
` voting unless members of the Council or staff request .specific
items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
.
13. LYNWOOD LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT I30. 88-A
Comments:
The revenue required,for the FY 1988-89 Street Lighting
Assessment District is $628,250. This will result in an
increase from $0.94/F.F. to 1.06/F.F. for residential and
from $1.66/F.F. to $1.88/F.F. for commercial.
3
' �
� � -
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1988
Recommen3ations:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached
' resolution approving the Report and setting this
matter for public hearing.
14. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD (FY
1988-89)
� Comments:
The revenue required for the FY 1988-89 Landscape •
Maintenance District is $679,400. The assessment rate for
next year should be $1.24 per frontage foot, which is the
same as this year's rate.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached
resolution approving the Engineer's Report and setting this
matter to public hearing.
15. WATER MSTER PURCHASE
Comments:
Staff requests that the City Council, by 4/5 vote, authorize
staff to purchase water meters by informal bid. •
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached
resolution entitled: "A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Lynwood Authorizing the Purchase through Informal
. Bids of water Meters."
' 16. FOUR-YEAR TREE MAINTENANCE PROJECT (FY 1987-88 - FY 1990 -
91) '
. Comments:
On May 6, 1988, the bid opening was held in the City Clerk's
- � Office for the Four-Year Tree Maintenance Project.
California western Arborists, Inc., Compton is the low bidder
($408,897.00). This contractor has the necessary experience ,
and a good reputation.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council award a contract to
the low bidder, Califor-nia Western Arborists, Inc., Compton,
'• based on its low bid of $408,897.0�, and authorize the Mayor
, to execute the agreement. .
17. PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECT (FY 1987-88) - CONTRACT AWARD
Comments:
On 'May 5, 1988, a bid opening was held in the City Clerk's
Office. Damon Construction Compang, Gardena, is the apparent
low bidder ($34,272.00). Damon Construction has the
, necessary experience and a good reputation.
4
. l,
. ! � •
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1988
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached
resolution awarding a contract to the lowest responsible
� bidder, Damon Construction Company, Gardena, and authorize
the Mayor to execute the agreement.
18. ANNUAL.REVIEW OF AND REPORT ON THE LYNWOOD GENERAL PLAN .
• Comments:
The Government Code and the Lynwood City Code require that
the General Plan be reviewed annually by the governing body.
The annual report was submitted to the Planning Commission on
April 12, 1988. The Commission approved the report .as
submitted and instructed staff to forward it to the City
Council for its review.
Recommendation:
That Council review and file the General Plan Annual Report.
19. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROGRAM
Comments:
Staff is in the process of updating the General Plan and feel
that a Staff Advisory Committee and Consultant Selection
Board should be formed.
Recommendation:
That City Council adopt a resolution approving the formation
of a Staff General Plan Advisory Committee and Consultant
Selection Board.
20. REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL CDBG FUNDS - BUSINESS SERVICES
DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE (BSDI)
Comments:
This is a request for Council to approve an additional
$4,8'79.03 .in CDBG funds for Business Services Development
Institute for two additional Lynwood residents in the Medical
r Transcription Training Program.
Recommendation: . •
Staff requests that City Council adopt the attached
resolution which approves an amendment to BSDI's contract
" allowing for an increase of $4,879.03 in CDBG funds.
21. EXTENSION OF COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION OPERATING AGREEMENT
WITH SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK (SPNB)
Comments:
The City needs an extension of the commercial rehabilitation
operating agreement with Security Pacific National Bank.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached
resolution extending the interest subsidy agreement with
Security Pacific National Bank for one year.
5
� �
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1988
22. PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DIVISION STAFFING
Comments :
Due to the shift in the Engineering Division workload towards
' construction administratian and away from design, the
division would be better served by adding a Public Works
Inspector position and deleting the Civil Engineering
Technician positiDn.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the City Council amend the authorized
position list to add one Public works Inspector position to
the Engineering Division and delete one Civil Enqineering
Technician position.
23. COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCH SYSTEM '
Comments:
The City of Lynwood is involved with the 3oint Dispatch
Center with five areas cities. A new computer aided dispatch
system is being recommended because the current system is old
and outdated.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the
` purchase of the Computer Aided Dispatch System.
24. RTD SECURITY SERVICES PROPOSED .LYNWOOD-COUNTY COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENT
Comments:
Every year, the City assists RTD with Prop A money for
security on the buses. The agreement is based upon recent
discussions with City staff indicating that the City of
Lynwood proposes to continue its participation in this
program.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the attached contract and
, . authorized for the Mayor to execute it.
25. SELECTION OF LABOit RELATIONS FIRM
Comments:
Staff has contacted two labor relations law firms to handle
- upcoming negotiations. The firm of Filarsky & Watt is
recommended. '
Recommendation: �
� It is recommended that the City Council select the firm of
Filarsky & Watt to handle labor negotiations for the City.
26. WARRANT REGISTER DATED MAY 17, 1988
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Warrant
Register.
6
- . �
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1988
' DISCUSSION ITEMS
27. PROPOSEA ANNEXATIONS TO THE CITY OF LYNWOOD INCLUDING CENSUS
TRACTS 5404, 5354, 5406, 5414, AND 5415
� Comments :
This report outlines the steps required to annex portions of
' County °unincorporated territory to the City of Lynwood.
Staff suggests that other unincorporated lands not included
in prior annexation attempts be considered.
� Recommendation:
Zt is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached
� resolution directing City staff to (1) prepare the required
resolutions for City Cauncil action. (2) make the necessary
applications to the Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO)
to initiate annexation proceedings'; (3) initiate proceedings
to pre-2one census tract 5343, 5406, 5414, and 5415; and pay
five hundred ($500.00) in processing fees to LAECO.
28. NOTICE TO COUNCIL OF PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 21, 1988 TO
� SUSPEND A BUSINESS LICENSE.
Comments:
Staff has been apprised of a business operating under false
" pretenses as a therapy center (in reality a massage parlor).
A pub2ic hearing is required prior to suspending or revoking
a business license.
" 29. REQUEST THAT CITY COUNCIL SET A SPECIAL MEETING FOR
DISCUSSION OF PENDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS
30. ORAL STATUS REPORT ON AD-HOC COMMITTEE
SHERIFF'S AGENDA
31. CAREER CRIMINAL APPREHENSION PROGRAM (CCAP) RESOLUTION
Comments:
City Council approved participation of the Lynwood 5heriff's
Station in a Career Criminal Apprehension Program. All
participating stations will be sharing in the cost, however,
it will be administered by Captain Elmer O. Olmohundro of the
Lakewood Station. Such piece of information should be
inserted in the resolution that was adopted. Also, the
resolution should contain a provision for the matching funds.
Recommendation:
_ Staff requests that Resolution 88-55 be amended to include
� the two provisions cited above.
7
� �
CiTY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1988
� 37. PROMOTION OF THE SUBSTAIICE ABUSE NARCOTICS EDUCATION (SANE)
' TELETHON
Comments:
On Saturday, July 16, 1988, .the Sheriff's Department will
have a telethon on Channel 9 to promote the Substance Abuse
Narcotics Education (SANE) and requests participation by the
City.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the City participate with $500 for 10
telephones.
CITY CLERK'S AGENDA .
33. SECOND. READING OF ORDINANCE: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
� COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD AMENDING ORDINANCE 1210
, -PROVTDING FOR AN AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR COUNCIL MEMBERS."
34. INFORMATION ONLY: ONE (l) VACANCY - RECREATION AND PARKS
COMMISSION
Comments:
The term of Bette Espeseth, Recreation & Parks Commissioner
will expire June, 1988. This is for information only.
Nominations at Council's regular meeting of June 7, 1988.
Appointment at Council's regular meeting of June 21, 1988.
35. INFORMATION ONLY: TERMS EXPIRE - HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
ADVISORY BOARD _
Comments:
Three (3) terms of office will expire in June for Housing and
Community Advisory Board. Nominations at Council's regular
meeting of June 7, 1988. Appointment at Council's regular
meeting of June 21, 1988.
, 36. NOMINATIONS: ONE (1) VACANCY - PERSONNEL COMMISSION
Comments:
At Council's regular meeting of May 3, 1988, it was
announced for information only of the expiration of term of
�Arnold Litke, Personnel Commissioner in May. Nominations are
in order. Appointment at Council's regular meeting of June
7, 1988. Mr. Litke sent letter requesting consideration for
reappointment. Mr. Kent Swift also sent letter requesting
for consideration of appointment.
" 37. CHARITABLE SOLZCITATIONS: CITY OF HOPE, A NATIONAL MEDICAL
CENTER & BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE - 6/26/88 THRU 7/17/88
. 8
� . �
� CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1988
REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION
City Council consider adjourning to a closed session pursuant to
Government code Section 54956.9 B to discuss:
38.. ORDINANCE RELATIVE TO HANGING CITY HANNERS
39. RECOVERY OF DELINQUENT TAXES
40. A. REORGANIZATION OF PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT - APPROVAL OF JOB
DESCRIPTIONS - HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR, PERSONNEL
ANALYST I, II, III, ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE AND OFFICE
� ASSISTANT I & II
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council:
' 1) Adopt the attached resolution amending the Classification .
P1an and General and Management Saiary Schedule to
include the positions of Human Resources Director,
Personnel Analyst, Administrative Aide, Office Assistant
I, II."
2) Decision on Department Head status of Director of Firiance
and Director of Human Resources and reporting
_ relationship
' 3) Recruitment mode
B. DISCUSSION OF CITY MANAGER AND ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
COMPENSATION
PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
. 9
� �
CITY COUNCZL MEETING OF MAY 17, 1988
, COUNCIL ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
41. MAYOR PAUL RICHARDS II
• 42. MAYOR PRO TEM LOUIS HEINE
43. COUNCILPERSON ROBERT HENNING
44. COUNCILPERSON E.L. MORRIS
45. COUNCILPERSON EVELYN WELLS
a. Report on the Marmac Property.
" b. Discussion of Browning Ferris Industries (BFI) proposal.
c. Request for policy to buy American made products,
especially automobiles and other vehicles.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION TO ADJOURN TO AN ADJOURNED MEETING TO BE SPECIFIED.
10
- _. . � _ , . _ .
� �
=-�
�� ��. C/ � �. ��� .
_ `,
���--,. ,
,__" . � .� J' .� E:. .
•'r
J : � �,��- �itp of
� �_
�
.`�
� � ��
r
E �� . �/ f y� b .�, { �a
(/ �+'•^ �� � . }' ' .
P � F
t� �� : ` '-��tate of �aritornia
_ - , ,�.
_ ,�
a �
r'��� '
_ , ��� ' I
�
�� � P R-0 C L A M A T I 0 N � .
` YHF.REAS, the chiropractic profession in The llnited- �
Staies,has desienated the month of ?1av, 1468, as Correct Posiure
'e .� Month to be observed throuohout the nation; and . �
- ' ^^" - WHEREAS, the best foundation for a health�� nation ic �.
,��� �an enliphtened citizenr� H•hich coonerates m�ith the r�en of science
x�ho minister to neonle in nain and sickness b>' dedicat.in�± their
.skill s to p,uarding and inProaing the health of our people; and �
� - �WHEREAS, chironracti.c doctors are sponsorinG Correct
� Posture htonth, to educate the public to the ��alue of�AOOd posture,
� � x�hich ic one of the ereatesi contributing factors to be2ter bealtH,_
�. . � ph)'sical endurance, working efficiently and attractice anpearance.
� NOh', THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVFP that the Cit)� of L��nwood
�� welcomes the opportunit�� to call uPOn all civic, service and
. fraternal orQani�ations, schools, youth organizations and�all� o{ '
� � our residents to cooperate with the member-doctorc of the Los
. - �Angeles County Chiropraciic Societ� .
� � �'Z"���� IN WITNESS TNF,REOF, I have set m�� hand and caused the
� $e81 of the City of Lynuood to be affixed this 17th day of P?ay,
� � � �� 1988_ �_ �� .
�-:
�i' ... , � � . ��:.:
r:: - � r::::-., .
� .'.'.
A�PREA L. HOOPEH, City Clerk PAUL H. RICN..ARDS, Hayor
�- � Cit�• of Lynwood . City of Lynwood �
� LOl1I5 J. HE7NF �
� � ' - Mavor Pro Tem � '
' - � R�BLRT HL'J�SA'.G �
" � � � Councilmember
- E. L. ^10RRI5
� � Councilmember .
. � - � EVPI.)'S !9ELL5
� . . Councilmember
AGE?�:DA ITF:4
7 �
�. �
DATE: May 17, 198A -
T0: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ,
, • FROM: Kenrick R. Karefa-JOhnson, Interim Director of Nl
Community Development �
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RENTAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
AND ACTIVITIES FOR THE 1988-89 PROGRAM YEAR
' PURPOSE �
The purpose of this item is to request that Council a) conduct a
• public hearing on the Rental Rehabilitation Program description
and activities for the 1988-89 `program year and b) after
consideration of citizen input, adopt the attached resolution.
approving same.
FACTS
1. The City of Lynwood anticipates the availability of $61,000
from HUD for the purpose of renovating rental properties
under its Rental Rehabilitation Program. These funds will be
' available Ju1y 1, 1988.
2. HUD regulations governing the Rental Rehabilitation Program
require grantees to conduct a public hearing to allow local
citizens an opportunity to comment on the Program's
description and proposed activities. This information was
• made available to the public on May 6, 1988.,
, ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
The City is required to submit a Rental Rehabilitation program
description to HUD in order to qualify for $61,000 in program
funds during fiscal 1988-89. The desccription must be approved
by Council after consideration of citizen input obtained at a'
public hearing.
RECOMMENDATION '
Staff respectfully requests that City Council adopt the attached
resolution approving the Rental Rehabilitation Program
description after consideration of citizen input received during
today`s pujblic hearing.
AGEP:ilA ITFM
�
. � �
RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTIOI3 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LYNWOOD APPROVING RENTAL REHABILITATION
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND ACTIVITIES FOR THE
1988-89 PROGRAM YEAR
WHEREAS, the City of Lynwood anticipates the availability
— of $61,000 in Rental Rehabilitation Program funds for the 1988-89
'. program year; and
WHEREAS, HUD regulations at 24CFR 511.20 (c) require
grantees to conduct a public hearing on the description and
activities of�the Rental Rehabil3tation program to obtain citizen
input; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted the required public
hearing to obtain citi2en input on the Rental Rehabilitation
program description and activities, and has taken citizen
comments into consideration.
, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lynwood
does hereby find, order, determine and resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. Rental Rehabilitation Program description and
activities for the 1988-89 program year is hereby approved.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of ' ,
1988.
PAUL RICHARDS, II, MAYOR
City of Lynwood
ATTEST:
ANDREA L. HOOPER� CITY CLERK
City of Lynwood
� APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Kenrick Karefa-JOhnson
± Interim Director of
Community Development' Dept.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
ACCOUNTING DIRECTOR
RENTAL REH•ILITATION PROGRAM CITY OF� NWOOD
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The City of Lynwood will encourage ar,d assist �ii �^e
rehabilitation of residential rental units in Lynwood under the
Rental Rehabilitation Program authorized by the U.S. Community
Development and Urban-RUral Recovery Act of 1983. Grant and
rental subsidy resources available from HUD will be used to
increase the stock of standard rental housing in the City and to
assure the affordability of such housinq to lower income
families. The program has been designed to maximize improvement
assistance to substandard rental units which will house .larger
families and affordability to very low-income households.
I. PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
In FY 1988-89 the City of Lynwood will encourage and assist
in the rehabilitation of approximately 15 rental dwelling units.
The program will be pursued by the City's existing staff
responsible for the Block grant funded multi-family
rehabilitation program, the Residential Rehabilitation Program
(RRP). Rental projects in the targeted neighborhoods will be
identified for assistance consideration, using Housing
Rehabilitation Specialists and Code Enforcement Officers.
Projects evidencing substandard conditions and predominant
occupancy by lower income tenants will be encouraged to apply for
program assistance. Proposed projects will be evaluated by the
Loan Committee of the existing Rehabilitation Program for
satisfaction of program goals. Approved projects will be referred
to Security Pacific Bank for loan processing, for both market
rate private rehabilitation loans and the program loan. Program
loans will be in the form of ten-year, 0� interest deferred
loans, forgiven in full at term, but payable in full if prepaid
prior to full term or at violation of condominium conversion or
assisted tenant discrimination prohibitions. Maximum assistance
will be 508 of the per unit rehabilitation cost, to a maximum of
$4,000 per unit. We understand that the limit is $5,000, however
a local decision has been made to limit the assistance to $4,000
to maximize the number'of units rehabilitated with available
funds. Program loans and attendant prohibitions will be secured
by a lien on the subject property. Matching private investment
will be accomplished where possible by the underwriting of
private property improvement loans by Security Pacific Bank.
Affected lower income tenants not suitably housed in
rehabilitated units will receive technical and financial
relocation assistance from program funds.
II. NEIGHIIORHOOD SELECTION
The neighborhoods chosen for the Rental Rehabilitation
Program have (1) the highest concentration of multi-family units
in the City, (2) the highest percentage of low and moderate
income families in Lynwood, and (3) the highest incidence of
incipient housing �eterioration. Some characteristics of the
targeted neighborhoods are indicaked below.
A. Location
The four neighborhoods targeted are located in three areas
of the City (see attached map). The first neighborhood has the
following boundaries, Century Blvd. on the north and east, Long
Beach Blvd. on the west and'Oakwood Avenue on the south. The
second is bounded by Imperial Highway on the north, Fernwood
Avenue on the south, IIirch Street on the east and California
Avenue on the west. The third has Weber Avenue and Cedar Avenue
on the north, Orchard Avenue on the south, Long Beach Blvd. on
the east and Santa Fe Avenue on the west. The fourth has Wright
Road to the north and east, Century Blvd. to the south and Duncan
Avenue to the west.
� �
B, Physical Description
The target neighborhoods have approximately 6,500 dwelling
units distributed as follows: 60� in 8-10 unit complexes
consisting of the original single-family dwelling in the front of
the lot and 2-3 duplexes or triplexes in the back of the lot; 20�
in apartment buildings with an average of 24 apartment per
building. Approximately 60� of the units have two bedrooms, 2-0�
have :three bedrooms and the rest consist of one bedroom and
efficiency units.
Over 60� of the housing uni.ts in the targeted neighborhoods
is in a state of deterioration, due mainly to deferred maintence.
The estimated cost of rehabiiitation per unit is $6�000 -$8r���
C. Tenancy
Oyer II0� of the housing units in the targeted neighborhoods
are tenant occupied. Owner-occupancy occurs mainly in duplexes
and triplexes. Based on a 1983 City Survey of California Rental
Rehab Demonstration Communities the approximate vacancy rate is
1.8�.
III. LOWER INCOME BENEFIT
• A minimum of 70$ of the rental rehabilitation grant will be
' used to assist lower income families. One-hundred percent lower
income benefit will be striven for, .but achieving that level is
� unlikely. No neighborhoods in Lynwood are so significantly lower
income, and no rental projects are so significantly substandard,
that more than 70� low income occupancy of a rental project
would likely be encountered. If 100� lower income occupancy were
necessary, significant numbers of non-lower income families would
have to be displaced by the property owner/applicant, which the
' City feels is an unacceptable circumstance. Given the
characteristics of the Lynwood neighborhoods and the displacement
which would result, no practical program design exists which
could achieve 100� low income benefit level. �
IV. USE OF RENTAL REHABILITATION GRANTS FOR HOUSING FOR
FAT9ILSES �
A minimum of 70� of the units assisted under the program will
be two-bedroom or larger. All assistance given under the program
, will be approved by the City's Loan Review Committee, using as
one of their criteria for project selection the goal of a minimum
� of 70� total program assistance to units of two bedrooms or
` larger. Priority will be given to units with 3 or more bedrooms.
p,- USE OF RENTAL REHABILITATION GRANT5 FOR UNITS IN
.SUBSTANDARD CONDITION THAT ARE OCCUPIED BY VERY LOW-INCOME
FAMILIES '
Priority will be given to projects with substandard units
• occupied by very low-income families. All assistance given under
the program will be approved by the City's Loan Review Committee,
using as one of their criteria for project selection the priority ,
. to projects with substandards units occupied by very low-income
families. .
VI. SELECTION OF PROPOSALS
Proposals will be selected by the Loan Review Committee
based on the following criteria:
� a. Correction of substandard units, especially those occupied
by very low-income families.
2-
• !
b. Predominance of assistance to large families in lower-
income categories, with a minimum of 70� of all 'units
assisted being two bedroom.
c. Maximum stimulation,of private investment.
d. Minimization of displacement of tenants.
The Loan Review Committee will also evaluate the pro forma
and loan processing information in order to select financially
feasible projects with maximum program henefit. Operating income
and replacement reserve levels will be consielered. The Loan
Review Committee will consider the distribution of Section S
existing vouchers to the tenant on the provision of financial
� relocation assistance in their evaluation of program benefit.
Relocation expenses paid to project unit displacees will be
deducted form the $4,000 per unit maximum assistance levels.
VII. FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
The Rental Rehabilitation Program will be financially feasible.
Private funds will be available through private lending
institutions, with negotiations under way to obtain lending
services for both program deferred loans and private loans from
Security Pacific Bank.
VIII. NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION
Neighborhood preservation is currently under way in the
target neighborhoods, using Block Grant-funded housing
rehabilitation, Block Grant-funded Capital Improvement.Projects
and Block Grant-funded social service activities. Additional
, property improvement under the program could only enhance
the neighborhoods preservation.
IX. SCHEDULE FOR CO[dMITTING RENTAL REHABILITATION GRANT AMOUNTS
5pecific projects have not yet been selected for the
program, but as the City runs an existing Block Grant-funded
multi-family rehabilitation program, projects suitable for this
procjram can be easily identified. All staff and mechanisms for
processing and approving loans are in place. Anticipating the
receipt of funding for the 1988-89 fiscal year in June 88, the
program anticipates expending $61,000 by 6-30-89.
Our best local estimate is that the average cost per unit
will be approximately $4,000. That means the program would
rehabilitate 15 units in 12 months.
X. NEED FOR RENTAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE
Not applicable. �
XI. NON-DISCRIP9INATION AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY
The Housing Authority will comply with affirmative Fair Housing
marketing requirements of the County of Los Angeles when .
', advertising the availability of rehabilitated units to solicit
applications .from persons of all ethnic, racial and gender
groups.
1. Written material on Federal Fair Housing Laws will be
distributed to owners/tenants. All advertisements
and/or public announcements regarding the program will
include the Equal Housing Opportunity logo.
_3_
� ,
2. Each owner assisted through the Rental Rehabilitation
Program will be marketed in a manner to affirmatively
further fair housing including but not limited to the
following:
a. Listing available units with the Section 8 Existing
Marketing Section of the xousing Authority.
b. Attempting to fill vacant units with families who
are active certificate holders through the Section
8 Certificatives/Vouchers;
c. Using the Equal Housing Opportunity logo in any
newspaper.advertisement, or written communication
to community groups, organizations; agencies or
other community contacts.
3. To inform and solicit applications from those perrsons in
the housing market area least likely to apply for the
unit. Owners willl utilize various community contacts to
advertise unit availability.
4. Copies of all written material regarding vacant units for
rent will be kept by the Housing Authority and owners.
Records will be kept of applications received in response
to available vacancies.
5. The Housing Authority will periodically review affirmative
marketing efforts made by owners to ensure compliance with
Equal Housing Opportunity provisions. Where an owner has
failed to follow affirmative marketing requiremens,
appropriate actions, available under program regulations
and/or applicable laws, will be taken to enforce
conformity.
Owners will be encouraged to comply with provisions of
affirmative marketing of the units for no less than seven
years after the completion date of rehabilitation of all
units in the project.
XII. PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITY PARTICIPATION
The Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles has
applied to HUD for Section 8 Existing vouchers to provide to the
City 's Rental Rehabilitation Program. A memorandum of
Understanding will be executed prior to the execution of an
annual contributions contract.
The Section 8 Existing Rental Rehabilitation Program contact
' person is: Willene Peterson, Housing Authority of the County of
Los Angeles, CA. 90022, at (213) 260-2716.
XIII. The necessary certifications are attached. They were
approved by City Council Resolution May �7�1988.
-4-
�
! •
DATE: May 17, 1988
T0: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL -�
�� FROM: Renrick Karefa-JOhnson, Interim Director of ���/�-�'
Community Development ✓'
SDBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
APPLICATION FOR THE 1988-89 PROGRAM YEAR
PURPOSE
To request that City Council a) make funding decisions regarding
1988-89 CDBG public service projects, b) conduct a public hearing
on the proposed use of CDBG funds for the 1988-89 Program Year,
and c) after consideraiton of citizen input, adopt the attached '
resolution approving the Statement of Objectives and Projected
Use of Funds for the 1988-89 Program Year.
FACTS
: 1. The City expects to have approximately $2,985,292 in CDBG
funds available for the 1988-89 program year from the
following sources:
1988-89 Entitlement Allocation $1,109,009
Reprogrammed - Prior Years 1,826,283
Program Income 50,000
TOTAL $2,985,292
2. On May 4, 1988, the above information was published in the
Lynwood Press. Also, details of the proposed use of funds
for the 1988-89 program year were published and made
available for public review at the Lynwood Library and City
Clerk's office. •
� 3. All proposed activities to be undertaken were specifically
identified, with the exception of public service projects.
The City•may allocate up to $166,351 to fund Public Service
projects during the 1988-89 program year. Public Service
project proposals totalling $465,563 have been submitted by
local agencies and City Departments (see attacchment A).
' Prior to submittal of the 1988-89 CDBG grant application, all
proposed activities should be specifically identified, which `
. requires Council to make funding decisions regarding those
activities it desires to undertake.
4: CDBG regulations established by the Department of Housing and
Urban Development require public hearings to obtain citizen
input on the proposed use of funds. Lynwood residents have
been afforded an opportunity to review the proposed
activities (including Public Service project funding
requests) and may present their comments at the public
hearing. � `
5. Council may decide, at its discretion and upon hearing
citizen comments, to modify the proposed Statement of .
Objectives and Projected Use of Funds. Council approval of
the final Statement, which incorporates any changes to the
proposed Statement, is require prior to submittal to HUD,
9GENDA ITEM
/�
• i
RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LYNWOOD TO APPRQVE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BL�OCR GAANT (CDBG? STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES AND
PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR THE 1988-89 PROGRAM
YEAR
WHEREAS, the United States Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974, as amended, established the Community
Development Blcok Grant (CDBG) program to provide decent housing,
a suitable living environment and expanding economic
opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate
income, and
WHEREAS, the anticipated CDBG entitlement allocation for
the 1988-89 Program is $1,109,009, and
WHEREAS, the total amount of CDBG funds available for the
1988-89 Program is estimated to be $2,985,292, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted the required public
hearing to obtain citizen input to the 1988-89 CDBG proposed
Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use
of Funds and had taken their comments into consideration.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lynwood.
does hereby find, determine, order and resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. Approve and adopt the Statement of Community
, ` Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds as part of the
CDBG Application for the 1988-89 Program Year.
SECTION 2. This resolution shall become effective
immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of ,
1988.
PAUL RICHARDS� II., MAYOR
City of Lynwood
ATTEST:
ANDREA L. HOOPER, CITY CLERK
City of Lynwood APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
— KENRICK KAREFA-JOHNSON
Interim Director of
APPROVED AS TO FORM: Community Development
CITY ATTORNEY
� �
DATE: May 17, 1988
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION _
FROM: Kenrick R. Karefa-JOhnson, Interim Director �j,
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance to Regulate Helistops-Case No. 88008
I
Proposalc
Pursuant to recent development activities, staff has prepared the
attached Ordinance reflecting the necessary development standards
for helistops.
Facts
Specifically, the Lynwood Regional Justice Center and St. Francis
Medical Center have expressed interest in developing a helistop
in conjunction with the construction of new facilities.
The ordinance discusses specific Planning and Fire Department
standards which are essential to active helistop facilities. The
proposed amendment has been reviewed and approved by the Fire
Department.
Additionally, the ordinance addresses the noise issue by
mandating the cooperation of the helicopter operator in using the
most noise efficient models of helicopters. This would mitigate
the potential for noise impacts caused by the use of a helistop.
The ordinance also addresses the added hazard caused by refueling
and/or repairs by prohibiting this type of activity and
prohibiting a heliport, as well.
Environmental Assessment:
The proposed amendment is exempt from the provisions of the State
CEQA Guidelines, as amended [Section 15061 (b) (3)]•
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
City Council:
a. Approve the findings in Resolution No. 2174; and
b. Waive reading and introduce the proposed ordinance.
V10:Helistop .
F:G :MDA ITEM .
!�
� '�'i ; �"�.
• • _
RESOLUTION N0. 2174
A RESOLUTZON OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOP-
TION OF AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 25 OF THE
AND W �CONSTRUCTION L OF O HELIS TOPSVWITHINHTHELCITYENT
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
did, pursuant to law, conduct a public hearing on a proposed
amendment to the Lynwood Municipal Code with respect to the above I
subject; and
WHEREAS, the Plannin9 Commission of the City of Lynwood
cbnsidered all pertinent testimony offered at the public hearing;
and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has determined
that the project is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines, as amended [Section 15061 (b) (3)).
Section 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and
determines as follows:
A, The proposed amendment will be consistent with the
dbjectives and the development policies of the City
of Lynwood.
g, The proposed amendment will notlandownersnaand
constrain the� use of property by
developers.
�, The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the
General Plan.
Section 2., The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby
recommends City Council adoption of the proposed amendment.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 1988, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES: Commissioners Kanka, Penalber, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Cole-Dennis, Dove
ABSTAIN: None
_.. , ///� J
G�
Lucil e Kanka, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
!. .
K 'ck R. Karefa-Johnson ugl D. Barnes
interim Director General Counsel
Community Development Dept.
V10: Reso2174
� . � �
ORDINANCE N0.
" AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD AMENDING CHAPTER 25 OF
THE LYNW06D MUNICIPAL CODE WITH RESPECT
TO STANDARDS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF HELISTOPS
WITHIN THE CITY OF LYNWOOD.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 25-13 of the Lynwood Municipal Code is h,ereby �
amended as follows: �
"25-13.10 - Helistops
A. Definitions
1. "Helicopter" shall mean a rotocraft which depends for
its motion and support in the air, principally, upon the lift
qenerated by one or more power-driven rotors that . rotate on
substantially vertical axis.
2, "Helistop" shall mean a take-off and landing point
. only and is that area of a roof structure, or platform above the
roof, or ground surface, which is intended and designed for
landing and take-off of helicopters.
B. Where Permitted
'� A helistop may be erected on buildings or other locations
� in the City as permitted by Conditional Use Permit by the
Planning Commission pursuant to Section 25.25 of the Lynwood
Municipal Code, provided that it is constructed and used in
accordance with the provisions of this Chapter.
C. Development Standards
1. The approach patterns shall comply with the "Fly Neighborly
Program" to avoid fly-over of the residential neighborhoods
as much as possible.
2. Construction of the Helistop facility shall comply with
building design for load bearing standards relative to
helistop landing pads.
. 3. There shall be no refueling facilities installed at any
helistops within the City of Lynwood.
- 4. Except in an emergency, no repair or maintenance will be'
conducted at the site of a helistop.
5. Special landing permits for occasional landings at sites
other than duly established helistops may be issued by the
Director of Community Development, subject to such
conditions as may be imposed by the Fire Department. Such
occasional use.facilities shall be at ground elevation, or
if at roof elevation; the building must have been designed
to accommodate a helistop.
Disk 25:Ord
. 1
� �
6. An application for a helistop Conditional Use Permit shall
be filed with the Director of Community Development, using
forms provided by that office. The application shall be
accompanied by a detailed plot plan showing location
in relation to land use in the area, and the size and detail
o€ the proposed helistop. A filing fee in the amount
established by Resolution of the City Council for a
Conditional Use Permit shall be paid at the time the
application is filed.
7, Roof top installation helistops may be erected on the roofs
of buildings, subject to the following conditions:
� a. On all touch-down or landing areas, whether elevated
or flush with the roof, provision shall be made for
collecting volatile substance which may be spilled in event
of any emergency. Separator or clarifier tanks for
collecting spilled volatile substance shall be installed
under approval and supervision of the Fire Department.
- b. The roof-top shall have at least two (2) conforming
- �.exits and they shall be located in such a manner as to
permit safe exit from the roof area in the event one of the
exits is blocked.
c. A wind indicating device shall be installed. A
flag, banner, or similar device is acceptable.
d. Two or more wet standpipes shall be provided and
equipped with one and one-half (1-1/2) inch rubber lined
fire hose at least one-hundred (100) feet in length. Hose
shall be equipped with combination fog nozzles. Sufficient
pressure shall be available to afford a good fog pattern.
Hose cabinets or racks shall be located near the separate
exits. Standpipe outlets shall be so located that all
portions of the roof area shall be within one hundred twenty
(120) feet of the outlet.
e. Two fire exfinguishers of at least sixteen (16) BC
rating shall be provided, and be located remotely from each
other.
f. Lights as are installed to illuminate the touch-down
pad shall be directed on to the touch-down pad only, and in
such a manner that the light rays cannot interfere with the
helicopter pilot's vision, or other aircraft flying within
the area of the landing facility.
g. No persons shall be permitted in the genezal landing
area in any location where any portion of their bodies will
' be higher than the touch-down area surface while landing or
take-off operations are underway,.
h. Approved means of communication such as telephone,
radio, fire alarm box, or signaling device shall be provided
adjacent to the landing area.
i. If the roof has no parapet wall, a substantial
and decorative fence shall be provided around the
perimeter of the roof to insure the safety of all persons.
Disk 25:Ord
2
� �
5�.^h roef-top heliport should have painted, in numerals not
less than two feet in height, the maximum gross weight in
thousands of pounds of the equipment which the roof is
stressed to accept.
k. The helicopter landing facilities should be located ,
in such an area as would permit a glide slope angle
determined by a ratio of eight feet horizontal distance for
every one foot of vertical clearance required. Two such
approaches shall be available, at least 90 degrees removed
from each other.
1. No light standards, roof vents, guy lines, TV
aerials, or other similar roof-top obstructions shall
be permitted within the required glide slope on three
sides, or within a 270 degree arc.
m. No refueling or repairing is to be accomplished at
the helistop, except in extreme emergency and then only as
approved by the Fire Department.
n. The roof-top shall be marked as prescribed by the
Federal Aviation Agency.
o. The City Engineer's approval of a building for use
as a roof-top facility shall be required as to structural
adequacy.
p. The roof-top shall be marked as prescribed by
the Federal Aviation Agency.
8. Ground-level Installations
a. The helicopter landing facility should be located in
such an area as would permit a glide slope angle
determined by a ratio of eight feet horizontal
distance for every one foot of vertical clearance
required. Two such approaches shall be available, at
least 90 degrees removed from each other.
b. An area of the Helistop shall be clearly defined by
means of a substantial barrier providing physical
restraint to prohibit the entrance of unauthorized
persons into the landing area. A centrally located
touch-down area at least 20 feet x 20 feet in size
shall be provided for helicopters of less than 3,500
pounds in gross weight.
c. No unauthorized persons whatsoever shall be permitted
within the general landing area during flight
operations.
d. The helicopter landing facility shall be marked as
prescribed by the Federal Aviation Agency.
e. Any light installed shall illuminate and be directed
onto the touch-down pad only, and in such a manner
that the light rays cannot interfere.with the pilot's
vision.
f: A wind indicating device shall be installed. A flag,
banner, or similar device is acceptable.
g. Two fire extinguishers of at least 16BC rating shall
be provided and be located remotely from each other.
Disk 25:Ord
3
� �
h. Where buildings or structures in proximity to the
i3n�i.ng area present a fire exposure hazard, there
shal%1 be provided at least two 1-1/2 inches wet
standpipe outlets equipped with 1-1/2 inches fire
hose, not over 100 feet in length, and a combination
fog nozzle.
i. Approved means of communication such as telephone,
radio, fire alarm box, or signaling device shall be
provided adjacent to the landing area.
j. No refueling or repairs shall be conducted at the
site except in an emergency under the Fire Department
. sugervision.
9, it shall be unlawful to:
a. Operate a helicopter using a helistop within the
City which is not equipped with the latest and most
effective type of noise suppression devices and
shall be equipped with a transponder.
- b. Repair or refuel a helicopter in a helistop except
� in.the case of an emergency.
c. later thanc�6t00 �p makeoffanyriaaytoexcepta as an
emergency.
d, Violate the requirements of this osdinance or the
� regulations of the F.A.A. or any condition imposed
upon the operation and users of helistops as
contained in a Conditional Use PeTint P=otecting
� regulatory department of the City
public safety.
e. Operate a helicopter in landing or taking off on or
from a helistop within the City in a pattern
contrary to the regulations of this Chapter or the
conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, City
Council or F.A.A.
f. Operate a helistop, or to use the facilities of a
helistop within the City for which a Conditional Use
Permit has , not been granted by the Planning
Commission.
Section 2. Section of the Lynwood Municipal Code is hereby
amended as follows:
"25-12.2 Principal Permitted Use ,
"f. Helistops, in accordance with Section 25-13.10 herein."
Section 3 . Section 25-8 is hereby amended as follows:
"25-8.1 Use
"Helistops, in accordance with Section 25-13.10 herein."
Disk 25:Ord
4
� �
Section 4. Section 25-8 is hereby amended as follows:
"25-8.1 Use
'Helistops, in accordance with Section 25-13.10 herein."
Section 5. SEVERABILITY
Zf any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause,
, phrase, or portion of this ordinance, or the application
thereof to any person or place, is for any reason held to be
invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court or
competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its
application to other persons or places.
The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted
this ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision,
sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective
of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections,
sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions, or the application
thereof to any person or place, be declared invalid or
unconstitutional.
First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City
held on the day of , 1988, and finally
adopted and ordered published at a meeting of said
Council held on the day of , 1988, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PAUL R. RICHARDS IZ
MAYOR
ATTEST:
ANDREA HOOPER
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kenrick R. Karefa-JOhnson
Interim Director
Community Development Department General Counsel
Disk 25: Ord
5
! !
DATE: May 17, 1988 �
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL �
FROM: Renrick R. Rarefa-Johnson, Interim Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Proposed amendment to Chapter 25, the official Zoning
Ordinance, modifying current density bonus provisions
Purpose•
Proposed amendment to establish regulations to allow density
bonuses of twenty-five (25�) percent above the basic density in
R-2 and R-3 [Multiple-Family Residential] zones.
Background:
' in an attempt to stimulate the private construction of sorely
needed affordable housing throughout California, the State
� L,egislature created the "Density Bonus" program in October, 1979,
by amending the Planning and Zoning Law to add Sections 65915-
65918 to the Government Code. This state involvement into local
housing affairs required local jurisdictions, including charter
cities, to grant at least a 25 percent increase in the otherwise
allowable land use density for developments consisting of at
least five (5) dwelling units.
The heart of the density bonus law is still found in Government
Code Section 65915. That section now provides that local
ju,risdictions must either grant a"density bonus" (defined as a
".density increase of at least 258 over the otherwise maximum
allowable residential density -under the applicable zoning
ordinance and land use element of the General Plan") or "provide
other incentives of equivalent financial value.
' At its regular meeting of April 12, 1988, the Planning Commission
adopted Resolution No. 2171, recommending that the City Council
waive reading and introduce the proposed ordinance.
Source of Authority
Government Code Section 65915-65918; Civil Code Sections 51.2 and
51.3
' Section 25-4.5 of the Lynwood Municipal Code
Facts
1. The current regulations of the Lyniaood Municipal Code
provide that a density bonus may be granted for each
increment of 6,000 square feet above the minimum lot size
established for any R-2 or R-3 zone, as an incentive for
merging smaller parcels into one large lot. Also additional
dwelling units may be permitted in the R-2 and R-3 zones as
' incentives toward providing low and moderate income housing
at the rate of thirty (308) percent above the basic density.
Disk 10-1:Density2
AGENDA ITEM
'�
1
� �
2. The proposed amendment would�repeal the density bonus for
large lot developments, and restate and modify those
provisions for a density bonus relating to affordable housing
for low and moderate income households, including senior
citizens.
3. Moreover, the proposed amendment would decrease the density
bonus in the Lynwood Municipal Code for low and moderate
income households from thirty (30$) percent to twenty-five'
- (25$) as�required by state law.
4. The ordinance amendment requires that density bonus
;developments must possess special or e�nique designs for the
granting of a density greater than 25$ above the otherwase
allowable density.
Issues and Analysis
1. The proposed ordinance reflects changes in State legislation
affecting the.density bonus program. For example, the length
of 'continuing availability has been accommodated by reducing
the minimum time period for which dwelling units must be
reserved �for low and/or moderate income persons or senior
citizens from 30 years to a 10-year period, with the
exception of projects which have a direct financial
contribution by local governments.
2. State law now provides that, in those instances where a
density bonus of 25$ must�be granted, local jurisdictions
have the discretion to provide, in lieu of such density
increase, "other incentives of equivalent financial value.
. The proposed ordinance has been amended to conform with this
" change in state law.
' 3. Despite,the apparent mandatory language, this amendment does
provide local governments the wide discretion to determine
whether a project reserving 25$ or the total number of
dwelling units for persons of "lower income household" should
be granted a density bonus or incentives. If it is determined
that granting the density bonus or other incentives would
' have a substantial adverse impact upon the public health or
safety, the local agency is free not to grant them.
4. The proposed ordinance also reflects changes pertaining to
senior citizen housing. The state legislature incorporated
certain senior citizen housing developments to the list . of
instances where local jurisdiction are obliged to grant a
density bonus or approve other incentives of equivalent
financial value. The draft ordinance has been prepared to add.
this statutory addition for senior citizen housing
developments.
Disk 10-1:Density2
2
� �
Recommendation
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2171:
a. Finding that the prop
osed amendmenc is ex'-���P` •`"""' the
provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended.
b. Recommending that the City Council approve the findings in
Resolution No. 2171, waive reading and introduce the proposed
ordinance.
Attachments:
�, Resolution No. 2171
2. Draft ordinance
Disk 10-1:Density2
3
/' � �
RESOLUTION N0. 2171
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSZON OF
THE CSTY OF LYNWOOD RECOMMENDING CITY
COUNCIL ADOPPION OF AN AMENDMENT TO
CHAPTER 25� THE OFFICIAL ZONING ORDINANCE
�TO DENSITYWBONUSESICINALTHEODMULTIPLE FAMILYT
RESIDENTIAL ZONES.
Whereas, the Planning Commission pursuant to law,
conducted a public hearing pertaining to an amendment to the
official zoning ordinance with respect to density bonuses in
multiple family residential zones. .
Whereas, the Planning Commission has carefully
considered all pertinent testimony offered in the case, as-
, presented at the public hearing; ,
Whereas, this resolution with Findings and
recommendations contained herein, shall constitute the report of
the Planning Commission to the City Council;
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of
Lynwood does hereby resolve, find and conclude that the proposed
amendment to the Zoning Ordinance should be adopted by the City.
� Council for the following reasons and findings:
A. The amendment is in keeping with the goals and
, policies of the General Plan;
B. The amendment will provide flexibility and
creativity in the design of multiple family
residential developments.
C. The amendment will enhance residential development ,
activities of the City.
D. The amendment will create a stim range
to propose and to develop
residential housing types and income levels.
Section 2. The Community Development Department has
determined that the proposed amendment, as set forth herein, will
not have a substantial effect upon the environment to require a
Negative Declaration under the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act, as amended; as the proposal is exempt
� from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of April, 1986, bY
the members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
AYES: Coaunissioners Kanka, Penalber, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: Conunissioners COle-Dennis. mve
ABSTAZN: None
Disk 10-1:Reso21
1
, � �
,
� Luci le Kanka, Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
, �;
I
�
ick R. Karefa-JOhnson Ibu as D. B es
_ Interim Director
Community Development Department General Counsel
�
Disk 10-1:Reso2171
2
.' � � '
ORDINANCE-NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD AMENDING CAAPTER 25, THE OFFICIAL ZONING
' ORDINANCE, WITH RESPECT TO DENSITY BONUSES IN THE
MULTIPLE FAMZLY RESIDENTIAL ZONES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LYNWQOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
- AS FOLLOWS: �
SECTION 1. Seetions 25-4.5 b 7 and 25-4.5 b B are hereby
deleted in their entirety.
SECTION 2. Section 25-4.5b is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"b. Special Requirements
"7, Part 1. -Density Bonus.
a. In order to encourage the provision of housing for
° low-and moderate-income households and senior
citizens, an applicant for a project in the
multiple residential zones may request and the
� Planning Commission shall grant, with appropriate
findings, an increase of twenty-five percent (25$)'
above the highest density of the applicable
General Plan residential category, if the project
complies with one or more of the following:
(1) At least twenty-five (258) percent of the
total units in the project are restricted to
the rental or purchase by persons and families
of low-and moderate-income, as defined in
Section 50093 of the California Health and
Safety Code, or,
(2) At least ten percent (108) of the total units
in the project are retricted to the rental or
purchase by lower-income households, as
defined in Section 50079.5 of the California
Health and Safety Code, or
(3) At least fifty percent of the total dwelling
units in a housing development are qualifying
residents, as defined in Section 51.2 of the
California Civil Code.
b. Density bonus units may be granted subject to the
- following conditions:
(1) The housing development shall consist of five
(5) or more dwelling units. ,
(2) Prior to issuance of any zone clearance
related to the project, the developer shall
enter into an Agreement, the contents of which
shall include, but not be limited to, unit
price, phasing, outreach methods, deed
restrictions and sale of units to non-target
income households, financing, and other
� affordability methods.
(3) Required affordable units shall be provided
equally within each development.
Disk 10-1:Densord •
1
. � ,
(4) The developer shall undertake an outreach
program for the purpose of notifying potential
target income households of the availability
of affordable units. Said program shall be in
a form and of a duration acceptable to the
City. .
(5) There shall be no physical differenEiation
between required affordable and other units,
including exterior treatment and design.
(6) That the developer shall contract with the Los
Angeles County.. Housinq Authority or an
- organization approved by the City of Lynwood
to screen potential buyers and tenants to
ensure that they meet target income group
criteria.
(7) If federal, state, county or city funds are
utilized such agreement shall comply with the
appropriate regulations.
(8? The certificate of occupancy for a density bonus
unit shall automatically expire upon vacation of
the unit. ' Prior to the reissuance of a
certificate of occupancy for the unit, the
Director of Community Development shall determine
that it will be occupied pursuant to the
requirements of this Chapter.
c. As an alternative, or in addition to awarding a
density bonus, the Commission may elect to grant
� other incentives, which may include variations to
the development standards contained in Section 25-
4.5 of this chapter.
"g, Part 2-Density Bonus - Additional Provisions
a. In addition to the provisions contained in Part
1, an application for a density bonus shall
also comply with the following provisions:
Application -- Contents. An application for a
density bonus shall contain the following
additional information and/or documents:
(1) The total number of dwelling units proposed;
and
(2) The number of dwelling units designated for
low and/or moderate income residents or
senior citizens; and
(3) The amount of bonus or type of incentives of
equivalent financial value, if requested, to
the grant of a density bonus; and
(4) A map indicating the locations of dwelling
units intended for low and/or moderate income
residents �or senior citizens, ancl further
indicating which units are for rental and
which are for sale, if combined in the same
proposal; and
Disk 10-1:Densord
2
� � �
(5) A draft agreement suitable for recordation in
the office of the County Recorder of Los
Angeles County, as a covenant running with the
land, for the benefit of the City of Lynwood,
indicating" the number of dwelling units as
specified by subsection bl of this section
' and also specifying the number of years that
said dwelling units will be continuously
available for use by low and/or moderate
income persons or senior citizens.
The availabilty of dwelling units designated
for low and/or moderate housing shall be
effective for a period of not less than 10
years, unless the Planning Commission approves
a different time period.
' The agreement shall include, among other
things, the following provisions:
(a) The developer shall give the City the
continuing right-of-first refusal to
purchase or lease any or all of the
desiqnated units at the fair market
value.
(b) The deeds to the designated units shall
contain a covenant stating that the
developer or his/her successor in
interest shall not sell, rent, lease,
sublet, assign, or otherwise transfer any
interests for same without the written
approval of the City confirming that the
' sales price or rental schedule of the
units is consistent with the limits
established for low-and-moderate
households and senior citizens, which
shall be related to the Consumer Price
' Index.
(c) The City shall have the authority to
enter into such other agreements with the
developer and with the renters or
purchasers of the dwelling units, as may
be necessary to assure that the required
dwelling units are continuously occupied
by eligible households. '
(6) The market rental rates, purchase sale prices
whichever are appropriate, for dwelling units
of comparable size and type within the market
area of the subject property.
b. Notification of Housing Authority.
The Community Development Department shall refer a
copy of the application for a density bonus to the
Executive Director of the Los Angeles County
Housing Authority for review and comment. The
Executive Director shall review such application,
and may submit comments and recommendations
concerning such proposed low and/or moderate
, income housing as is deemed appropriate."
Disk 10-1:Densord
3
. � �
SECTION 3. The last sentence of Section 25-4.8 d 2 is
�.�..-.,ti.. am ended to read as follows:
I
•a, Development Standards.
^2, Density Bonus.
" * '` '` ermitted,
The number of additional units p
� including those permitted as bonus units as
incentives toward providing low and moderate
income housing, shall not exceedermitted-f1bY
percent (25$1 of the number p
' . paragraph d 1 of this subsection."
SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY• �
if any section, subsection, subdivision, sent�Ynt
clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance,
application thereof to any person or place, is for any
reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by such
decision of any court or comgetent jurisdiction, .
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
, portions of this ordinance or its applxcation to other
' persons or places.
The City Council hereby declares that it would have
adopted this ordinance, and each section, subsection,
subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion
thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more
sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or
portions, or the application thereof to any person or
place, be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City
held on the
day of , 1986, and
finally adopted and ordered p
ublished at a meeting °
of said Council held on the
day of �
1988, by the following vote:
AYES:
' NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Paul R. Richards II
Mayor
ATTEST:
Andrea Hooper
City Clerk
Disk 10-1:Densord
q
. � �
APPRCVED n�� T!: .^.ONTFDIT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
, � � � �
;
Kenrick R. Karefa-Johnson Henry S. Barbosa
Interim Director
Community Development Dept. General Counsel
. ,
�
j,
f
� � �
i
. �� �
�G
_ �
��
� ,
>
+�
a
� ..
. � �
� .
, �
� p M
I
- 1
4 .
I
;
i
� ��
Y
4
;�
a
�
.. },, .
. � . . _ . _ . ' .
_ N
Disk 10-1:Densord
5
� �
DATE: May 17, 1988 .
TO: HONORABZE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL �
FROM• Kenrick R. Rarefa-JOhnson, Interim Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT• Proposed amendment to Chapter 25, the official Zoning
Ordinance, modif in current densit bonus rovisions
Purpose: �
proposed amendment to establercentgabove�thetbasicldensityslin
• bonuses of twenty-five �ZS$� Residential] zones. `
g-2 and R-3 [Multiple-Family
Background:
� In an attempt to stimulate the private construction the SState
needed affordable housing throughout California,
Legislature created the �Density Bonus" program in October, 1979,
by amending the Planning and Zoning Law to add Sections 65915-
65918 to the Government Code. This state involvement intcharter
housing affairs required local jurisdictions, including
cities, to grant at least a 25 percent increase in the othe�fwia�
allowable land use density for developments consisting
least five (5) dwelling units.
The heart of the.densitu.bonus law is still found in Government
Code Section 65915. That section now provides that local
jurisdictions must either grant a"density bonus" (defined as a
"density . increase of at least 258 over the ot l ? cable m zoning
allowable residential density under the app
ordinance and fiand-ase.element of the General Plan") or "provide
other incentives'of'equivalent financial value.
At its regular'meeting of Apr1lrecommendinghthatathenCitymCouncil
adopted Resolution No. 2171,
waive reading and introduce the proposed ordinance.
, Source of Authority
Government Code Section 65915-65918; Civil Code Sections 51.2 and
51.3
' Se�ction 25-4.5 of.the Lynwood Municipal Code
Facts
1. The current regulations of the Lyn be� a 9ranted lP for C each
; provide that a density bonus may
increment of 6,000 square feet above the minimum lot size
established for any R-2 or R-3 zone, as an incentive for
merging smaller parcels into one large lot. Also additional
' dwelling units may be permitted in the R-2 and R-3 zones as
incentives toward providing low and moderate income housing
� at the rate of thirty {308) percent above the basic density.
Disk 10-1:Density2
1
� �
D.�TE: n,�r 1�, l�ea
TU: THE AO\CR.�BI�E '191"Oh A?:D �tE`IB�RS OF THE CITI' COti`CIL
P'ROM: J�SEPH 1`. ��'A'�G, F.E. � U1RF.CTOR OF PL'I�LIC IdORIiS/��
CITY" FtiGI'�FrR
SL'P,JECT: LI"\t+'OOD LIGHTI\G ASSFSS`9ENT DfSTRICT NU. 8P-A
PURPOSE:
This report recommends tllat tne City- Coiincil appro�;e i;h� att�.ched
Engineer's Report, for L,��nz��uod l,i�htin� As:�essment. District ?�o.
88-A and recommends th�t. t;he Cit,y Counci.l adon' a Resolctiion of
Inter�tion i�liich sets this matter of puUl.i� hearing.
' BACTiGROL\D:
The L; r�tirood L:_�'htin� Assessment Di.str•irt r.as first e5t:auli_shed :�n
19i8 tander t.he Strert Lighting Act cf ]913. The district c;as
reforried ii� 79E1 under the t.,andsrapin�' and I.ightii�; r1ct, of :9i2.
- Thu 19i2 Act is simple and eccnom:ical �t.o administer Yor either
� ] i ghi i n� or ] anrisc.sp:in, The cost. c�f mai nt.entari� e, � nc; t;dii'�, the
� zssessm��nt. <:m. i.r�eerin� costs and adminisY.rtal-.ion can bF� l.evied
arn�nia]].}' agai;�ict. 1.he p�°o}�rri.ies i.h�.�,h t�_cei.ve the ben� �,:=
t.hrreb� reliev,in.� t.hc� Gerie�r:�al Fund of t:hat amonnt. Px'opert.�
pi:ners are �SSessed on7} for the benefi.i�.s ��ecei�-e:d. �
Tha Ci1;} Coimci.l, on .�pril 5, 19RR, ei��rpted a ra��.oltrtion
r�rnpnsi.ng Po��m:�.ti.ori nf a I_:i.:l�it.in: ,tisessment D� �.t,i�:ict pursuar;t tu
� t]�e L�r:�lsrapin� a�:d Li,girt.in� 9ct o° 1972, and direc*ed t.he
� pr�paration of �t1t':s Fnginecr'� P,epqrt;. The estim�.�tn�9 cnst of
pr�o�idi cit�.�-i:ine li-�ht.>>� is 5669,350. �ince �i surtlus of
��}i,:GO for the� fiscal }'ear of 7_98i-�8 �a projected� the retie��ue
rr,quired for the fi.scal ��ear 798R-89 is 5fif,9,3`0.
� A2:.aL_l'STS:
� S'taff i.s recommendin� that the assessme�it rate be set. aY, a rate
that zaill m�l;e t.he Stree# Light.in� :issessme�it District: self-
suf,firi.e�iit,. :hei•efore, i�,he recommended asse�ssrtient for� n���st cear
i.s SG2E,250. Thi.s caill result. in ai� increa�e from 50.94/F.F, to
51.06/F.F. for resiclential and from �]..66/P.F. to �1.88/F.F. for
ceinmercial. Therefore, the cost t;: an a�'era�'e :i0' reside�itial
lot rould amount. t�,o ��3.00, 56.00 up from tl�is ��ear.
RLCOyMF•.i:'n�TiO`:: � �
It. is recommended that the Cit�- Council:
7. adopt t.he attached resolution which appro�e�1 the En�ineer's
R.eport., �znd,
2. Adopi i:he at.t.ached I2esoliation of Intention c.lii.cti setis thi_s
matter £or Puhlic Hearina on June 2, 198c�.
At t.achr;ent.s
C04.660
AGENDA ITEDt
—��
� �
LI'�WOOD LZGHTING ASSESS�tE'�T 1)ISTR7f T
EtiGIVEER'S REFORT
Pursuant to the
La;vDSCAPI�G A\D LIGHTI�G aCT OF 19i2
(Division 15, Part 2)
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
STATE OF CALIFORP:L4
DATF.D: MAY 17, 1988
LY:��+'OOD LIGHTI'�'G ASSESSMLNT DISTRICT ti0. 88-a
Prepared by:
JOSLPH I, k':1\G, F.E. .
Direct.or of PuUlic k'orlcs/C';t}- En,ir,ee
� ll330 Bullis Road
� 1 -Sr�w��od, Ca].ifornia 9026?
C04.670
� �
E.\"GI\ rEF.'S FFFORT
.HE HC?duF::\BL.E `I:.�'UP A`:U `:E':B-F.S O� ';;;i: C�;"i c"�i
CITY H.�iL, LI'?;kOOD, C' :LIFGR::I °�
LIGH?I:`�G .455"r:SS'tE!'tT DZSTFICT .':0. 83-:1
Gentleme�::
� PllT'SUHYi� �O i i.�]c ] ;'.O. gi—�]�� 2u�C'_�t.i�(� 5}' �'i�U'i' }iG[]O7°d�):F•
F3od;; on :1p� i1 �, 193�, I I;a�.e prepareci tne
E.\"GI':FER' S REPORT
S'E'_C1Ui7'@G r��� tll2 1.,�'zII['�SCa�1T1� i'..11U i.1��:t.1L� .�.i�'.� [ii L�� I cl � 3:=: &L::' �IaCC'. �
� � � � � , � „ o � - .. , t,f tltC.
�bein Di�.�zsion ��, �art �, Stree�s anc'A H;;h�r„1s ;-e,c_c
State of Calif�i�nia). The proposed spucisl assessn�ent
prcceed;ngs contempla;;e thc iev;ain, of �.,, a��e;sment `:,,
i;ro� i din, the nece��sar�� fund.s to furnis}�� t.l:e � j e�:tri r'�:;r-, '.�r. ,
ar,d for 1 _ �na: �t��:�a::ce of the �l.ectrica'�_ _;.ar,uird�=: a�i' °�.�, � �_es
;� ,_°��hti `�s�5��mc.�;. District }!o. °8-.-1 here.;ft,--i� �: {'t�.:���ca ,.,,.
Ti�r- t�..;�: t_�_l�i�e a air.st ii;.:sF: erce�l:, oP 7a:',c. c�, •
� p 7 -i .h'i�� <�::i��3
di�.tri�±. L�er.��fi.tin, from thr, pro;�osed �.mp�c�er:��nts «.. r��,uired
't');. '��,.'r31: , .
THT_` L�., r- ,-� ,,� �r n ;
� P:;r �,�ant tc; D�. ;.o;: 7S ?'art 2 0£ said ' � } F o
, ;.ghta i.� .ac . o� 1 9 �_ ac
a:ne::d<.rl, i� is _ cuiree an �ng'ineei's Re_,u�t. b�= 1;;
fil.ed i:ith the C�t;- Cl.eriz, �:i1�, i.n turn, pres:�r_ts it 1�.c� YI�e t°�':;
� Gci.ncil fer it.s ccr,si�.',erat�un.
The sa:�_ Lrzgireer's Report c.�n.=_��;sts of 'the fol.lo�ain�:
1. D;."-.GRA�i�' ,':D P1.."-.'.� ;�:C. 192°-,,, c;hi�,h :r.c;.uded the pare� ls of
� iHl"i�� l:].�1:�iY1 Y,`lE'. asses SRl@Il� (�iStTl^�� EuCil }�C-111� iUli'�
di_mei;si_oned; the ].egal descript;.on of ea^h parc;ci nnd t he
bour,dari F:�s of i.'t�e assessmen't distric` ..re- s,�u�: ;, t,he� pare�,; s c_
land ir� said d:strir_t subjec� to assessm�ri,,r are a_'] :h�� paice'�=
� �,
. ,
of ]ana a�.thir� .i�e Ci'.;;, e_;ce1�`, tho:�: pai��•1� u;' p,�L.�.:c pro����*.;
c;hich are e�en:rt ;ron; asaes��:�ents as prn�ided �; ::.ac:.
Thc - 1>i;; si�oi,s t} api;ru�;:r�iate lc>caticr, anc: ;;pe, cf .:�ach .i.amp
� „� .i in ..._ d�?i:�, r,_ci:.. Fn� more d�'� :iled inf'r�rmation, r�=:ference
. .� l;ereb�: n;ndv: to Dia�rar,i�, ;�nd Plan :do. ]988-.4 presented
i�ereki t?..
2. SPFC; r IC?.TIO`:S . Tiie sercices t.o l>cr p: ovided inc; ude l,ut are
, not iim;.ted to, the fcllot;i.n�: electrical ei:erg�-; rep3ir r��;d
i•ep�ac�=:ment cf sti-ee� l;,ei�t standards and fiaturc-s; l.ahc:r;
materi.zals; equipment; mis impr.�vcment:s, o�-erhead snd
ir,cidental s:orl; ❑s required.
3. ESTI�INTE of t'rie cost of tl�e r:lectrica,l energy, o;,er�it.ic�r, �:,,:,
mai.nt.enance ( ir.cluding the incide:ztal espenses ;:'ar i.he .::�a; ��.:ar
, �
�Engineer's Report ,
May li, 1388
Page 2
period beginnii�� July, 1988, and ending Junr- 30, i93�, 1=. as
_ , follci�s:
A. Personriel 5 �� �;;��
B. �;aintenance & Opera�iot;s �r1,60�
C. Streei. ?Iain'.:enanre/Capi^,,a-'. Cos:.s 28,:,pp
D. Dep:,rfinent 0�-erl�ead 23,800
E. �General O�erhead ���gpp
F, r'i�ed .�sset Char;les. _�_
G. Christmas P,ecorstio�7 ;q � ����
TOT;1L COST Sf,fi9, 3;i0
Linhtin� Fi.;nd, Estimat.ed
Surplus from 198;-gg � ;+; 1�����
Total F.e��enue Required c; q��
=1. TOT.�L �;ti�1BER OF LIGHTS I\ ?'HE CITI 0�' I1'� [�iii)n
EDISO�� U[c?iED CSTF US<�:EP TOT,1L
Lumen V'�umber �urr.en \umber L.ume�ri `:wnl
0 0 =�,nco � lsz �,000 �cz
3,500 :,665 0 0 9„OC 1.G65
15,000 150 1�,000 25 75,OCi; 7":>
20,000 1�/O LO,O00 l00 2O,OG0 21�
� 0 2�,500 50f 2:,,�OC 5CG
� 0 C 35,000 3 3�,OO�C E�
� � 4i ?�� �}7,000 E��
. � O o5,O00 5 55,000 �
TCT.�I� l;og5 89E 2,883
5. ZC\E DESC�I?TIO`�
1. he�idential properties witli i - 15,000 lumen lights..
. 2. C'ommercial properties �.ith 20,000 -:i�,000 li_hts.
' There are appra�:im;stel�� 9,85} psrce7.s of prop�rtc• i ',he City
of L��nc:ood, e:;ciuding parcels of pt�b.lic prul��'i''-S> t,he cost of
cahich is not ineluded i_n their respec,^.i,e z�,n� s.
B• DISTRICT DESCR.IFT10?2 ?\D COST•
Zone Feet R.ate, Amount
: �93,420 51.06 3523,025
z �5,082 51.88 5103,55=�
5626,579 sa� $626,580
� �
En?in2er's Report.
?]as 17, 1988 �
Pa.�e .',
Estimated Re� S62E.�R0
Lightin� Fund, Estimated 5 41,100
Surp7us from 1987-0°
ss��,sao
7. aSSESS^]E':T ROL.L
� Pursuant, to said Li�htirig Assessment aci.; of 19�r2, as amerider3, t;i�e
"Diagram and Assessmen`. Roli so filecl c;ith the Count.} A:ailitor,
. the description of t.he properties on the map l,uolzs of che Coimt�
.�ssessnr for the thei� current year, "shall Ue used in these
proceedi: .
�In compliance �cith tha aboce si.�lui:e, cop�es c�f t.l�iic Goi_ii�t.,y
�sscss;ux�'s ?iap snd the Co��nt.} Ta� Collector's t.a:�: rolls iaere i�s�.,d
in thi.s En'ineer's. Rcport. The as;;essment; rcl.l., �oa� rac;h parcel
of lar�d therein, shows t.her le_al descript,ic;n thc_� Coiant.y�
assessor's cede numbers; t.he assessib]e foota�e used in
calculating t.he assessment aeainst each indi��idual parcel and tl:e
�rand tot�:7. assessment le� All parcels of lar;d in sai.d.
district �;ere included in t;.o '.:ones of L as set. fort.h
hereinaboce.�
The foxe�oi_n; En�;.neer's Report, which :ir,cludes PL:-'.\ �ir��; ;;I:1,R:1`]
\0. 1°S8-.�, ASSESS?IE'�; ROLL and the E.STI`I;^,TE OF COSTS is
presentrd heret�i_th for � appro�al b;, re.so7titior..
Dated tliis 1it.h d�;- of �Iap, �908.
Respectfullp,
JOSF_.PH 1'. 1�A\G, P.B.
Di rectur of Pub] i.c i•iorl,s/Ci`.�- En,'ineer
Citp of Lpnc:ocd
.�1Ytaclimeti`s
� C04,f"o0 �
���..�i�_. -;`��
�_, � ,�° �. _ �IT� �F -�;;`,�,�"�
��� �_. .� .�, °�
�, .�� I' ;� �� ��
_' �---- n ��, �.�
���� ak�'rlatrl' ���� ����Bc! - �(�Fo�:�-
� � \ _ �-cu.�n o��o-
_ �_�L L x —
�
_ , �,� ,
- - -- _ - - . J I �l i��
e ... o � _ 1
� ' �r [1 C���_l�i]I 1
. a � • __ 'J _ _ —
f
� � --_ --�°u '_;�-�---
, � —_ .� � 4„�- �:d1(A'" '
` � �� �-� o b C--� ' _ �`°"� � �
, � _ � _ 1
� _ 11ll�'�
�-.. ...__ � � 1 �
�� ,..�.,: � � � �;�: �::_� : ,.� � �� � ���� II( --�
J _ � �I�
�', --y. I ,� ,.. �il , ,'
, O � � _ ".;� i:i,' �
Q � �,,, ,,,,� • ��� �� ,,_
.s. ' �oC� ° _ �c i �;,� �'' � r ���l�l�''°��
� —'�� ���� -����"l�l�l _T __
� � ���'�J �� � �-�'-_,—��- _—`X�`"��h111� —'u'! � . --
__ � �-1 �,
`� —" — C� -- ,� - �.���` j� ����-���..� o' --�.
,
LYNWC�p LIGHTING ASSFSSMENP DISTI2ICT _ \ � =Ju�� 1 �• � '•• �
• • -�� �� �� � �
�p — —��o l. ��� , _�� I ,
, .el �� C_ "�\\\\`�� , � ..�
�: �. �� � � �` L�� �vc Jf�� �
p licly awned �roperties ��, �(�� �..�
are assess�nt exa�t. ' "CY���
.`"`"� � • � .�
4� v ��-?�'�:� �����-"- ,�
2. For information on lines and ' o'` r - �� �
dimensions of each lot or parcel, - � F „?�:� L � "'�'� ^--� �
refer to � Plan 19 87'A and � Cbunty � �_'�`�I �� y .�
l� s s e s s o r s P 1 a p s o n f i l e w i t h t h e � "''�--' ` � � � I� �
Director of Public f�brks/City Enqineer ` ; ..J �•� I ,`
-
. - - f�;�� � ---_ �� ,
:;
_ _111� ����� - -. , „ .
� ,_.
. � _ ��.���,�..
�_'�� ��• --/�
� �
RESOLLTIv\ \O.
.� RESOL{.�TIOV OF THE CZTP COL':�CIL C;F' THF: C�'1'Y U'I�'
L1\icOpD, APPROVI"JG THE RLPORT PRI;F;\RLD PliRSC:\�i'1'
7'0 O1L:iFOh'\1A S�'{tEL^'S :1P;D 1llGHk,41S CuDIS, SISi"i:iCi":
22�65 E7' SEq. , 95 OR.11TR.ED B�` TFiL Cl"PY CUC`:C1L v,'i
APRIL 5, 1988, RLL,ATI?�G TO ASSESS^iE\T DI9TTt;:;'I'
\'O. Q8-:a, (I:S?ik'OOD LIGH1'I?dG ASSESS>IENT
� D 1 S'P R I C'S� �.
� kff]?REAS, the L`itc C'ouncil on apri.l �, ]9°8, a�lupted
Hesolution No. 8g-q5, instructing the Director of I'ut,iic Wurlcs/Cita
F.ngineer to make and file with the Git�- Clerlc, a r��port in i:riting
in accordance caith the requirements of Streets and gi�l�iaaT�s Code,
Section 22:i6o et seq.; and,
S.'HEREAS, the Director of Public ldorl:s/Cit�� Ei�Sinec�r has
made and filed said report iaith the Citp Clerlc and tlie City Clerl�
has pirsented said x•eport to t.his Citp Counc;l for cunsid��ration;
NOk, THEREFORL, the Ci.t}' Counci] dc,es he:rc:1,}- reso]�°e,
order, and determine as foll.ous:
� Section 1. The Git�° Goui�cil. has considerea �.ii�i passed on
said repor�t. Said report, as filed, is hereb�� apl�ro�t.d. Said
report., iticludin� anp plans, specifications, estiinates ui' cost and
� expe�ses, di��ram and assessmen�s are ineorpacated her��in L�
' �reference and shall be placel on file in the oifice of i:i�e� C'i.t-r
Clerk and ma� be e�amined by anz- interested pers��n,:;. R��f�arc;�ce iti
made to said plans and.specifications for a desci of t}�e
� proposed maintenance �aorl;.
'— Section 2. This r esolution shall t.al:e: �_ftc:: ! i_m:nr;riiat.r 7�
upon :ts aduption.
PaSSED, aPPROVED and ADOPTED th;s da} of
1988.
� PaUL 1�. RTI.'?i:�FUS 11 , i;a� oi• �
Citc of Lcncar�od
ATTEST:
A;�DREA L. HOOFER, Cit�� Clerk
City o: Lynwood
' ` c1PPROVED AS TO FOR?]: APPn06'ED AS TO CONTL\T:
� F.��� i I
Cit}' �lttcrne5- ��EPH Y. :r'A;v'G, P,E.
- Director of Public Works;Cit}- Enginec
City� of LS�nwood
C04.G90
� �
STATE GF C,�LIFOR��Ia 1
1 ss.
� COLi*:'PS' OF LC>S A?�GELES )
I, the w�dersi�ned, Cit,y Clerl. of the Citp of Ltii�i:ood,
do hereb�- cert.if5- that the above and fore�oing resolutiun iaas
duly adopted by the Citp Council of sai.d Citt at a rc;;ular rneeting
thereof held in the Citp Hall of said Cit:.y on the da� of
, 198$, a:�d passed Up the following �•cte:
AYES:
\OES:
ABSE?�'T :
: Cit,y Clerlc, Cit�` o.` L;:itc:i,u�
STATE Oi C.�LIFOR\IA )
• ) ss.
COli\T� OF LOS A\GFLES )
S, the undersig'ne�l Cit� Clerl. of t,�e Ci.ts� oC I..;;r�t.00d,
and Clerlc ��f the Cit} Cc�uncil uf said C'it; do 3,ereb� certi.f�
that the aUove and foregoing is a full, true and correci, cop� u.`
Resolution \o. c,n file in m�- office ar.d t.hat. said
� resolution iaas adopted on t6e date an3 b�� tl�c-_ vote tl�erein
stated'.
Dated this da� of , 1388.
Cit;� Clerlc, Cit}' of Lyriwuc�d
� �
RFSOI,liTIO`: :d0. �
� RESOLIITIO\' OF THE CITI� COtS'CIL OF THE C"IT1' C?I
LINWOOD, DECLaRI�:G ITS ItiTE'�'TIO\ TU ORDER THE
FORMaTIOK� OF A LIGHTItiG ASSESSyE'�T DIS1'RICT
WITHI\ S.�ID CITP FliRS0.1\T TO T'HE "L:1\`DSCAPItiG
AND LIGHTIS�G ACT OF 1972", ,4S A^1F\DED,
— (CU`9�yENCING lcI^iH STREETS A*:D HIGHV:_11�5 COD�
S�'C'I'IOA 22500 F,T 5E�.1: DESCRIBI':G THL DTSTRICT
� TCi B@: BF,A'EFITEll AS�D TO L'� ,455E5SPD 9'�! �l?'+� '!';?1;
_ CGSTS A\D E\PE\SES ::3Eh'EOP; I�L'�L'zG 1'I:L 'I',1?lE ;,P1L'
� � NI.:ACE FGR. }IEARI':C PROTFSTS .q":D OP..JEC';';.0'�'.� TQ "FHF.
POR?tATIO`: A\D LE\'Y 0: :'',SSESS?1L.`:':'S lUli 'I'I1L FItiC.`.i:
S'E„R �198S-89; ASD �'�l�i.'J; THE TI";E ;1tiD PL�aCL OF'
THI' FEGL'LAR ^iEi?T7\G TO HI?AR PRO'fI:STS :;"JL'
OBJECTIONS T^ 9'H`e: A5SF:SSME\T OF THE n`:'�LAI,
L^i5T.4L:LMENT .
( :ssessment District ,":o. 88-e�, Lvn��ood Light:in;
Assessment Districtl.
tcHERE.4S, the Director of Pub=.ic korlcs/Ci t1� Engiiieer has
submitted a pronosed map of .�ssessment Dist.rict ':n. S£? 1 ir:dicat.in�
bc a boundary line the etitent of said territor;r inol.u:ied in the ,
proposcd assessment district; and,
�+HEREaS, th�e Cit�- Cour,cil has di.rected� and tLe Di���ctor of
Pub]ic ldorl:s/Cit} cngint�cr Las prepared aiid filcci a raport in c;riting
� containiiag ali mat;ters :equired bs Council. und_er Streets ar�3 Hial�caa�-s
� Codr, Sectinn 2256:i, et seq.; and,
. !dHEREAS, said report �has b�:ei. presen to the. Cit�' �our.cil
fi>r uonsi_�lerat.icn and l;eas bee❑ recei�ed and al;pro��d; �
\0[�', THEREFOR,E, the City C.ouncil does hrreb. rc�ol�e, order
and determine a_. follows
Sc:ction 1. Pursuant. to the Landscapir<<, a�i:a Li�hLin�� :�nt
of 19i2 as amended, ti�e Cit Councii of tLe City c,',' I.:};i::�ud l;ereb}�
declares its intention to order formatior. cf an asse;;.nient: di�t.rict
arid to�� lev^ and �collect assessmen�ts for tliuse i.it�pro�r>.u�r_nt,s described
as:
Installation �cr construction of public 1i.�htit�� facilities
for a;�s iacilities iahich are appurtenant theretu or i:hich are
necessai� or con�'er,ient. for the maint.exiar�ce ur sri�iuii�;�, t:ieceo`'
�
includir., but not limited to, electri� currc?nt, rel�air of at:reet.
light standards and fi�tures and in<:idental ccst s i nc l�icliu<, laUo: ,
material and equipment. ,
Th� a:ea within i.�hich impruvement shall Ue made is within
the boundaries o: t.he Cit� of L�'n�:ood as shown on the accompanyi�.�
map identifi.ed as ?.ss�ssment District �iai� '�o. 19F8-A,
Section 2. The report of the in�inee: upproved b}• Council
-- on �la} ti, 1988 Up a resolution, and on fil.e iu thc oPfice of the
Cit� Clerk, describina in detail the impro�eme�;t.s t.;:� Le made, the
boundaries of t.he assessment district and sn�� zones tt�erei.n, and the
proposed assessments vpnn assessible lots and parce,ls of land c:ithin
t.he Dist,rict remain stihstantially unchan�,ea aand is therefore
incrorporated herein h�- th i s reference as t.ho;.gh ful_L� seT. forth.
� �
Ser,tinn '. Vm�.icF:, i_s hereb�� 2ivei: tl��a�t�. Juru, i, 198�;,. at.
the hour u: i:30 p.m., in the Council CharoLers uf �_i'.1 iia�:;, 11^30
�� Buili�s Roar3, �Lcnwood, Califurnia, is t?:c �ate, I�:our cind p1c��oF ti>:ed
fur the hesring uf pi�otests .�rd objectint�s l;}� the Cit.;, ,:uti;:c;l. t1�z�'
and all pe�sons ha�-ing :.ny �prot�st or ol�iection Lc, _.��;iu proposed
� maii�tenai�ce, �the ettent of sa'id assessment di:;tric*, nr c1�e� le:�t of
. t.he pruNOSed assessmen�t mav appear baPore the �'it;,- Coun�:il a� saiu
� � hearing and shor cause wh;; said m�intenaiice sliou;d :����t. Le carried out
and the proposed assessment and dia�ran: confi;•med, all in accordance
with saic3 Resolution of L�ter.t ar:d report. Prior to the cor,clusion
of i.he hearing, anc ii;�er�,sted person ma> fil�� ri �:ritte�� prutasl. �ai`,h
ttie C.i�t� C1F�il;, or , h3ving I;re��iously fi.led a 1>rot.esC, ma�� file s
caritt�n c:ithdrawal' of protest. A i:rittert pi'ai,est. shall stat,e al1
�rounds cf�objections. a protest b� a propert}�� uvu�i� sli&ll �,onl.sin a
description si�fficient to identify the property oiarie�l l;> hi�n. :�11
interested persons sha.11 be afforded t:he opl�ort:ur,it� f.�_; hear atid Ue
heard. The cit�� Cowicil shall consider ali ural stat:ements and
c:r�i_tten prot.esi�.s or communir_atior�s made or fi]ed L,y �i�i inte;�resi,�=�9
person.
� Section 4.. Notice is further given tl:at Le.�;i-r,c,i.r;g ii: Jur,e:,
19$9, p�arsuant to Streets and Hi�h�:a�-s �'��de, S��c:ti��u 2"�65, the
regular meetin� to consider the annual .i;;st.al].meut sli.�', 1 1,� l�el�i un
� the date, hour and pl �ce of the first rt;gulnr meFt, i n�; ; n �urie � as �
� spec in e.n� ordinance oi resolut.io;'� or urdan of e.t;e Cit;,� Co�;.�c:il
" fi.xin� the time and pl.ace of its regular�iaeet..ir��.
� :Section �. The Cit�- Cleri: is l�i�:rerr dir�ci:l.��i? i.c, cause
' ciot;ce of the passa�e o;' �this resolution T,o Le �>> ���.❑ ait LI���. �ti.me arid
place in the fcrm and mann�r provided l,y� la�J.
Sectior: 6. This resulution sha7.l take t:ffec.t immrdiai,elr-
upoi, it.=, adoption. � �
• FASSED, AFPROPED and ADOFTED this da� cf ,—
1988.
' � PAUL H. RICHARDS, I1, "1a5•or�
Cit�' of LS�ncaood
ATTEST:
ANDREA L. HOOPER, CitS� Clerl�
Ci.tc of Lynwood
APPROVED 95 TO FORM: APPROVF,D A5 Tii C'i)NTEtiT:
� 1�./
CitS' Attorney O��FH I. d.aNU, i-`.L.
. �irector of Public Aori�s/Cit�- En�:neer
Ci t}- of L}-r.kood
C04.700
, � �
STATE UF CALIFORNIA 1
t ss.
COti�TY OF LOS aNGELES )
'— I, t:he undersigned, Citv Clerlc of the Cit�� of I_-:r,i.ocd, do
" herebti� certify that the fore�oi.r;� resolutior; �:ns 1.>assed and �dopt:e�1
b� the-City Council of the Ci.tc o£ Lcncaood a� a re�riilar meeting held
on the da�- of , _���.
�YES:
ti0E5:
ABSEtiT:
� � � Cit3- Clei�lc, : it}- of l,rnr.uod �
� �
�aTE: ri;�r i��, isaa �
TO: THE HONORAELE MAYUR 9ND MEPIBERS OF THE CITS' f_'O�XCIL.
� FROM: JOSEPH Y. H'ANG, P.E. , DIRECTOR OF PL?BLIC WORI{S ��
CITI' ENUI�EER �
SUBJECT: LAiv'DSCAPE MAINTE\A\CE DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF L1'tdld00D
� � ' lFY 19�8�-89} �
PliRPOSE:
This report recommends that t.he Cit�- Council aripro�-e the at;tached
Engineer's Report. for Landscape Maintenance District of tl�e City
of Lynuood, fiscal year 1988-89, and recommends that the City
Council adopt a Resolution of Znt.ention which set.s this maY.ter of
' Public Hearing.
BACI{GROL?K�D: � .
, The L�'ni.*ood Landsscape Maintenance Distrie;t was fi rtit, foi�med and
assessments first, levied in 19i8 fo].loi:ing passage of Resolutinn
No. i8-7P,.
The assessments caere le�ied as a fair and eqi�itaUl.e wa�° tu
provide funds to maintain, operate and imprnve the landscaped
areas in the Citti. The nlans artd specifi.catiocrs :cr t:l�e Dist.ri.ct.
are on file taith the City- Clerl; and the Uirector uf P�.�blic
Works/Cit;. En.�ineer.
The Cit}- Courcil, on April �, 198°, adopted a reso]ution
. proposin� formation of a Landscape `iaint.enance Dist.rict. pursuant
to the Landscapin� and Lighting Act of 19i2, and direct.ed i;he
preparation of this Engineer's Feport. The estimated �:ost is
$81$,048 for providing City��ide ].andscape mai_nten�nee for `,he
next fiscal ��edr �:ith a four ;-ear tree trimming c`cle. S.ince t.he
' surpltis of 513A,648.00 for tne fiscal. �-eac of 1987-8P is
pro.jec'.r�cl, t.he revenue required for 1988-89 is �679,400.
, A\ATYSIS:
St:aff �s no�a cecommendin,� that the assessment rat.e be set at a
rate t}iat �:ill mal;e the Landscupe Maintenance District self-
' sufficient. Therefore, the recommended assessment for the nezt
� .is 56�9,�CO3 The assessment rate cro�ald be S1.2� per foot. of
fronta�'e, c:h.ich ;s the same as this iear's rai:e.
F.ECO'�1*7E�DATION :
It is recommended that the Ci_t}� Council[
1. Adopt the attached resolution which approves the Lngineer's
Report, and,
2. ad.opt thE attached Resolution of Intenti.on cahich sets this
matter for Public Hearin� on June 7, 1988.
AtLachments
AGENDA ITEK
.. � - - �-.:_ _.__ i
C04.590
, � �
LAADSC.aPE MAINTENA�CE DISTkICT OF THE CITS' OF L1"�k'OOD
ENGINEER.'S REPORT
Pursuant ta tt,e
LAtiDSCAP7'�G A'.�'ll LIGFITI\G r1C;T OF 1972
� (nIVISIOti lb, PaR.T 2)
� STREETS �'.dD 33IGHti�?.5'S CODE
S:ATF. OF CAI,IFOR\Ia
Daied Map 17, 19$8
LaNDSCAPF. �1.4INTE\A\'CE DISTRICT vF THF CI7'Y OF LYhW00D
Prepared b}-:
JOSEPH �. �v'ANG, P.E.
Director of Public Works/CitS� Engineer
11330 Bullis Road
�Lpnwood, California 90262
COY.60�
� �
' ENGINEER' S REPOR'I'
THE HU\ORF,BLE ^lAY'OR A\D ^]ENIBERS OF THF. CIT1' COUNCIL.
CITP HALL, LY?�'WOOD, CALIFORNIA �
L��DSCAPI: MAI�TENA�CE llIS7'RICT OF THF CI'I'1' OF' LY'�WOOD
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to the Resolution No. 88-44, adopted bc �-our }�onora'.�le
Bodp on .4pril 15, 1988, I have prepared the
E�GINEER'S REPORT
required bp the Landscaping and Li�htin� of 7972, as amer�ded,
(bein� Division 15, Part 2, Streets and Highi.�es Cnne of the
St.ate of California). The proposed special assessment
proceedings contemplate the lcv;�in, of an assessment fnr
providing the necessarp funds to maintain, operate and improve
the I,andscape hluint.enance Distric` of the Cit�- of I.yii�aeud.,
, hereaft.er referred to. The le��y- Fill Le against those parcels of
lanr] c:ithin said district benefitin� from the propnscd
improvements, as required by law.
THl? E\GI?dEER'S REPORT
Pursuant to Division 15, Part 2, of said Landscapin� an�] I.ig}itir�g
' Act of 1972, as amended, it is required that an F.nginee.r's R.eport.
be prepared. and filed with the City Clerl;, caho in tnrn presents
it to the Cit�� Council for its consideration.
The said Engineer's Report consists of the following:
7. DI�GRa`I A\P PL4\ '�'�. ]�78-L SPFCIiICAT70\S
The L�-nc.Tood Landscape ^Iaintenance District was first formed and
assessments first le� in ?9i8 followin� the passa�e of
Resolution No, i8-78 U�' t.he Cit.,y Council. The plar�s �.nd
specifications for the District are on ,`ile with the Cii:� i:'lrrk
and Director of Public Works/Citp Engineer. The Distric:. i.s
diagrammec3 on the attached map and information on parti.cular '
parcels is located on the Assessor's ^1aps.
Briefly, the fol].ocain� ser�iees c;e:�e pro�'id�d for the resi.dents
of L� b� funding prucided b�- tne Landscape Maintenance
Assessment DistricT..
LA\DSCAPE `1AI\T�\'A'�CL•
CITY" PARt� (39 acres) `]oia9n„ ed�in�, caeedin�, iri:i..q<�1.i�.�rr,
restrooms maintenance,,paintir�g and fence repraii.
Also trash pick-up.
JOH\ HAM PARIi (10 acres) ^fowing, edgi��g, weedi�i�, ir•ri,ga`.ic;r�,
paintine and restroom maintenance. A'..so trash
picl:-up. �
LSV�DBERGH PARSC (1.35 acres) Plowing, edging, weeding, irr.i,gation,
painting and fence repair. .also trash picl;-iip.
CICIC CFNTER (3 acres) Moc:in�, ed�ing, irrigation, trash �
picic-up and sweeping dowr� wallcs.
. � �
Page 2
Eneineer's Repor'c
Mac 17, 1988
STREET h1EDIaNS '(Long Beach Blvd., 1j,000 squax•e feet; State
Street, ] 1/2 miles; Imperial Hightaa�-, 1,i00
square feet; At;la�tic A��enue, 7016 square feetl
^tocaing, edgi.ng, irri�ation, trash picl:-up and
eradicating pests.
' �+'ATER k'ELLS (Si1 locations, I]750 square feet) ^]oc:in2,
edging, c.eeding �ind i.rri�ation.
. STREET ISLAVDS (3 locat.ions, 3,100 square feet) �lcuing, edgir.,g,
weeding and irri.dation.
L.S.C. YARD (640 square feet) ^1oi:ir��, edging, i;eedin� and
. irri�ation.
I . TREE hIAI\'TEN 1NCE
; ACTIVITP ; Vo. of Trees ; Tons of
�
� 87-88 � Trimmir��s
� I i
I
' Trees Raised ' - �
� , 23 ; o.l
� i I
; Trees Fu11 Trimmed ; 1981 ; 1742.E
; � �
�
� � �
�
� ; TOTAL ; 2009 � � 1i�7.7 ; �
,
� ;
�
� ; ;
�
� ; —
; Trees Removed -0- �
� '
- a - �
�
' Stumps Removed ; -0- ' -�-
� �
' ; � �
r
; Trees Planted ; EO ; -0-
� , � �
� , �
' Tree Emer�encies 19 '
' ' � -�-
, �
2. ESTI?iaTE
ESPE'�DITL`RES Si-88 ES7'.
� � Tree `faintenance ^�2�6,69�8`
Parlc `laintei�iance 561 , 350
Subtoial �818,O�E
Landscape Putid
Estimated Surplus
from 1986-87 5138,6}8
Total Amount. to be Assesse3 5679,400
� �
Pa�e '
Engineer's Report �
yac 1"r, 1988
Staff is noc: recommending that the assessmFnt rate be set at a
rate that. caill make the Landscape Mai.ntenance District self-
sufficient.
DISTRICT DESCRIPTIO\' A\D REVEVliFS
There are approaimately 9,854 parcels of propert�-, i:ith
approaimately 548,502 front footage within the Cit�' of I..��nc;ood,
excluding parcels of publ:ic propert.p, i�he cost of which is not'
included in the district.
Total Front Foota;e �lssessment Rate Revenues
` 548,�02 51.24/F.F. ^�680,142 sa� $680,7�0
3. ASSESSMENT ROLL
Pursuant to said Landscapirig and Lightiii�; Act of 19 i 2, as
amended, the "Diagram and Assessment Roll so filed wit.h the
Count�� Aud'itor, the description of the properties on the map books
of the County ,4ssesssor for the then current �ear, "shall be used
in these proceedings".
In com,pliance with the ahove statute, copies of t}�e Count�
Assessor's Map and the Count�• Ta1 Collector's ta,; roll.s c.;ere i�sed
in this F.n�ineer's Report. Tlie assessment roll., for� each par•cel
of land t.herein, shows the legal description; the Cotint.c
Assessor's code numbers; t}�e assessable footage used in
calculatin� the assessment. against each individual parcel and the
�rand total assessment levied. t111 parcels of lar:d in sai.d
district were included in t�.*o zones of benefit as set fnrth
hereinabove.
The fore�oing En�ineer's Report, crhieh incl.udes PL,�"i sncl DIAGRA*7
N0. 1978-L, A5SES5yEKT RvLL and the ESTI*1ATE OF COSTS, is
presented herewith for t-o�ir 3pproval b� resolution.
Dated this 77th da5- of Map, 19P8,
Respectfully,
C��1/ c „
; c_I �.
o EPH •r. �,.avc, �.r.
Director of Fublic Worlcs/City- En�ineer .
City of Lyn�.*ood �
C04.610
•
;
�.,� � � `
�'���m CI'TY OF ,�{ y�►°�°
�
o.
_..� � � . �,� � ^
. --� _-� � �� c � � ��,'
� .�.—r `�_— rF�:r�7'�7{7�' � ■ � �� � � � , _ F O�l= ^.
. \ — . C .n � ==-- • � . - � .
«Y �_� R ���I� \. -Gwe�[CLCr.R(1
, �1 ' _
� - - - �l+ l�_I�
° �� ° �_�I ��
��- � - -
_ � -- - ��
A — •
l _ — . . _ —. 1 '" . ^ -- _
� x
\ � J � , .. K �� ��,�' 'mm----. ,�'��/l� �v
*� _ - 1
� ������
� � _ � - l �
� �--' � :.. ��� ,�
,...�.. � 1�����--��� :��� ll��ll�l
� � r �
„��- � - :��- � �' .� �n � •
, a �;;� ��.�' ' C ��� - ��J .., _ �,
. �o , o a�,-'�� � l�I��lll�� ���_�
� - ��� ����'�� � __
� ,, _ _ ������ � � _
. �� � � k�
_ , __
-�. �_ _ � r � l` � � � r . 1 �, �
, � � ;� � _, LIL� � �:.. a ,
� �� �,� � ,..:�_� �
L1TB�dl70D IANDSC11pE itAlNi'II411NCE DISTRICP - 7-
1�- rt p �_..
N(YI'E: 1. For information on lines and • _ G ��� ���.. li� �:..�. ._ � 4
v� U `'\_ , ,
dimensions of each lot or parcel, ', ' U���� �))�� �` �� �,
refer to Plan 1978-L and Count = ' � /� �_
Assessor's MaPs on file with the '�"� ��q� �
Director of Public Works/CiCy Y ' o�" ' "'"'.�U ���
II�gineer. � - " Y , . ,� �If - � --- _ ,_II,�
�� -���I_ a
o _ � �_� .�_
2. All publicly aaned properties are � •� f �
assessment exe�t fran the District. � � � ''1 �, �� ""'"'- -
� � . ^.^.. . _
� N�.
]l l�lll � �, -_.-� '=11 __ " _- - �. ,
� �
RESOLLTIUN NU.
A RESOLliTIO\ OF THL CITP COliNCIL OF TFIF C1T5' OF
� � LY2�WOOD, APPROVI��G THF, � REPORT I'REPARED YUR5G�N1'
TO CALZFUR\IA STREETS AND HIGHk'a}'S CUDE SEC9'lON
� 22565 E`P SEQ. , AS ORDERED BI THE i;7.'1"� C<�i�"�C; i, 0': �
APRIL 5, 1988, RELATING TO ASSESSME:N7' U169'RJC'I'
N0. 88-a (LPNWOOD LAhDSCAPF. MAINTENa^:i;E
DISTRICT).
` kHLREAS, the City Council on Apri.l 5, 19°R, ,sdol,t.ea
Resolution Ko. 88-44, instructin� the Pii•eutor of I'ublic �+'orl;s/Cit�
' Engineer to malce and file c:ith the Ci.t� Cler4;, a i�_:j;urC. in i;citing
in accordance with the requirement.s of Street.s a��d iliqhi:aZ's Code,
Section 22565 et seq., and,
S+'}IEREaS, the Director of PuUlic k'orksjl.'it� Engineer f;as
, ` made an� fi7_ed s�id rel�ert wit.h the Citp i'1.��rlc aucl t�.ha Cii.; ��lr,rl�
� has pr�esented said repurted to this City Counuil fur c�_,nsi�]eraC�ion;
' ?.Ok, THERLFORE, t.he Cit�- Council does }ierebp resol�re,
order and 3etermine as follot:s:
SECTZC\ 1. The City Council has con�ii!erea anS passed o::
said rzport. Said report, as filed, i.s herebi� apy�ro�ed. 5aid
report, includin� plans, specificaticns, estiinat.e i,f cust. and
expenses, dia�ram and assessments are incorporated hr�reit� b�
reference and shall be placed on file in the Office.of i.l�r_ Cii}-
Clerlc and ma5° be esamined b� any interesteu per H��ference is
made to said plans and specifications °or a descripT.ioi� uf the
propusPd maintenance caorlc. '
SECTIO\ 2. This resol.ution shall ta}:c efft.ct i.mmedi.atel.;.
upon its adopt:ion.
� � PASSED, aFPRUA?ED and aDOPTED this da;r uf
1988.
� P�L'L FI�. RI.CIIARDS , 1 I, Ma�
�. � City of Lynwood
�1TTLST:
AUDREA L. HOUPLR, City Clerk
' City of L�-nwood �
' APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVI'D AS TO CONTENT:
` �
Cit}- AttorneS J S PII I`� ,'�; I'.G;���
� Director of Public �corl�s/CitS En�'ii:ce;��
C04'.720
' � �
ST:1TE' OF CALIFOR?:IA �
1 ss'.
, COUNTI' OF LOS ANGELES t
I, the undersi�r,ed, Citc Clerk of i:he C'it.�- of L�n?:coc, do
hereb}� certifp t}:at t'�e fo*_•e,goin�' resolution was pa�s�=d ;.;id auoptcd
b,y the Cit�� Council of tl:e CitS of Lyn� at �i regul�.� ;ueetirig l:e1d
on the da3- of , 192,8.
AYES:
NOES:
�ABSENT:
C1ti Clerk, Cit.S uf L}-nt;ood
� �
i LSOI:I`TIc")�: \O.
,1 RESOLL"PIO`: OF THF. CTT�' CUli:dCI� OF T3IE i`!'f"� :il:
L�':`:WOOD APPROVING TI�IE EV�GINELR'S GEP'vR'f �>': 'I'!I[
La?:DSCAPE ^1:;1RTL;'�'A\CE DISTR7CI', llL�:L:1R!.\G f'I'S
1VT�\TIO!� 'I'0 ORUER ':HE LE�`YI:dC OP AV?ili.-1'..
ASSESS`SE'<TS [+'ITHIti SAID CITI' FDHSL'A.':'P T� 'I'IlE
' ' ° LAVDSCAPING A"1D� LIC{HTIV�❑ ,1CT OI� i 9 i 2" ,;;5 �
` AME'.cDED� (CO^t`1L\Ci`�l: ScITl{ g'rr2I:LTS :� }11GH1�.^�1:'.
C(�DE SECTIO` 22500 ET SEQ• ,): LrSC.:: 3I`:G '1'IIF
k P,ItiTR.1C'i' TO BE BE\i.rI.EP. .y:CD 7'0 BL :`,5�i::`:Si:l.i 'i'u •
F�.dY TjHr rO5T5 :1^.'D ESPE.`:SES ".':;L-G.E;Jp: P',.'i;:^.�� ":'ll'.>
� Tt-ML AA�D PL.�CE FCR- HE:iRL'�G PRO'1'L::7'S �",iJU
UL'JEC'Tb0?;S ':"0 THF �:EVF OP .aSSF,55?!L':;5 PC!i�: 'I'I7L
FISCF.L }r.?F, ':988-89; A'iA F1�:I\; 'fll?3 'I'i>1L .>N�;
PI..4;:E !JP 'PI-P.-= NEGliLaR ML�TI:�G "P:; iiE.1R ?'PO"1'F.STS
..'�:D UB„'ECTIO:`.'S 'r0 1'HL '-�SSr.cc�1F(�;1' UF "filL .1"
; �S"�
. � (�.L.S1caSC8.pC-'. �I31T1�27'.FiI'1C@ DlStr':.Ct U� t;:l:' [li,,l' Ci
Lpm:oocl i � ' � �
I�HERE.�S, t.he Direc,tor of Pub'ic jdo�rlcs/Ci�t} L:��,'i-ne�'r of `.ISe Cit� �of
� L.�-�,�:ood did; on �tl'ie l�th dat of ^Iai 1988, file i.i_t-h t.l'�e C'it Cl<.�ri;,
as ordered b� Resolution kc. °8-�-� o; the Citi Council ��: i:hc; Cit
of L}ni:ooc, adopted An.•il �, 1388, a repoit reiati.�:, t.o t:he ser��ice
necessar_- to maintair and i-inpru�c a11 pai�ics and larclscaped ai�eas.
i;ithir, publio ri.�ht;-of-iaa} and C:t.��-oia:;es l;iopartic:s in i,l�e Cit} of
� L,c�;wood, said �.r�tten report being' in compliance ��-itli Chapt.er 1,
Sect.ion 22500 et seaq., of the Streets and Hi,,'hua�s Code o; the 5tat.e
� of California.
— \Ok, THEREFCRF., BE IT RESO�V�D bp the Ci t.5' Coui,c=_1 of t;�e
Citi' of LSni.�ood that:
SECTION 1. Said report b}- the Di.rectcr oP 1'uUlic '�rorks/
City En�ineer is hereby appro�ed and adopted a, fi.lecl.
� SECTION 2.� T}Zat the public irite�°est ai;cl saf�;t; req��ir� �
� and it is the intention of tl�c Cit� Counci] �.�:'' Llre� C; Ly� of L;,rn�:�:�oci
to lev}� and collect assessments for furnisi;ing t.lii� - ser��ice ne.cessar�
_- to rnaintain and improve al]. pub.Lic landscapF:c] si�ess cuml�cisin� 29.� '
acr��, uf I;ar„land, the Civic Center Complei, si.� }.,as.<i�u1.1 diamonss,
� t;ao f�_r�s stat.iuns, si:� ��ater� iaells, 3 streef isl:::ids. O.J:S acce_.s oI'
me4iar; i.�!anss and approximatelp P,000 parlci:�ay tre� s ii� tlie Ci.t.� of
Lynwooc� „-ithin the district described in Sc:ctioi; 3 hrreof ai�a to b<:
I;no�:n as "I.andscape Plaint.enance District of th�_ C:t� of L>�;�,�ood."
R.eferer.ce is herel�� made to Dia�ram \'o. 1978-L sr.d S1 �.cr3tioi:s
� No, 1378-�L on file in the Of,`ice of t}ie Cit� C].e��ic of aaid Cit} 3nd
Plan �;o. 19i8-L tn Ue on fi.le c:itt: t.he UirecCcr of Pul,7 ic. kr,rk�./Ci t,,,
Engineer.
SECTIO�: 3. That the e�terio�-• buundar� of t=he district to
be ber:efited therefrom and to be assesserl to pap the� costs and
e;;penses thereof to Ue kr.ocan as said assessment dist.rict is
descr5bed as follows:
_� Those pi�operties 1� within the Cir,�- iimits of the Citp �
� of LS'm:ood. Reference is hereb� made t.o tl;e I:n� i n��ca''s Rc_�ort on
, file �ai_th the CitS' Clerle. Ali publici.y o�:,�ed pi°c,�;er�.i�zs are
assessm�nt etempt.
� �
SEUTIO\ 4. That the said contemplatea irnpco�tn�rnt shall
be had and taken under the pro�-isions of Divisiun 15, F'art 2 of the
Streets and Highways Code, cited as the "Landscaping and Lightin�
� Act of 1972, as amended".
SECTION 5. Notice is hereUy given that June: 7, 19P8, �t
the hour of 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of �itt• Hall, 11330
Bullis Road, Lymaood, California, is the date, hour aiid place fi�ed
for the hearing of protests and objections by the Ciity Cuuncil. Anc
and all persons ha�-i.ng any prote'st or objection to said proposed
maintenance, the extent of said assessment, cli:strict, or the le��y of ---
the proposed assessment ma}• appear before the Cit:}- Counc:il aat said
hearing and show cause wh� said maintenance shou]�:; not be carried
out and the�proposed assessment and diagram confirm�:a, all in
accordance �ith said Resolution of Intent and R=�port. Prior to the
conclusion of t.he hearin� „ any interest.ed person u�a} file a�:rit.ten
protest c<ith the Cit}' Cleric, or, ha�in>' pre�iousl5' filed a protest, '
may file a written withdrawal uf protest.. A z;ritten prot.�:st shall
sLate all grounds of objections. r1 protest by a prupeit� oi=rie_
shall contaia a description sufficient to identify tl�e properL}-
owned by hiin. all interested persons shal]_ be aff��rd�d the.
opportunit> to hear and be heard. The Citc Council sha1� cansider
a11 oral statements and.c�ritten protests or co;nmunicat:io7ra made or
filed bp any interest�d perswi.
SECTIOPI 6. �otice is further gi�en that be} in
Ji.ne, 198°, pursuant to Streets and Highcaa��s Code, Section 22�G5,
the regular meeting to consider the annual ir:sta].lmei�t shall be. he1G
on the date, hour and place of the first ie�ular n;eE�i.in�c in Jur�� as
specified iii anp ordir�ance or resolution or order of t.he Cit.S• Council
fising the ti.me and place of its re��ular mecting.
SF.CTIO\ i. The Cit� Cler1; is hereb�� directed to causc
notice of the passa�e of this Resol.ution to be �„i�•ei; at Ll�e Cime <a;id
place in the form and manner provid�d b�• lzi;.
SECTION 8. Tl�is resolution shall take ef`e� imi*�edi.atei;
upon its adopt:ion.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this da} of ,
1988.
FAtiL }I, RIQHARUS, II, � ,1aS'or
- City of Lyn�aood
ATTEST:
ANDREA L. HOOPE�, City Clerlc
Cit� of Lcnwood
, aPPFO�'ED .4S TO FOR?I: APPROVED AS TO CON'PF.'�T:
�/ ���
City Attorney EPH P G WANG, P. .
Director of PuUi.ic t+'orks/Ci.t�• Engirieer
'- �C04.730
� �
STATS OF CALIFGR\IA )
) ss:
COL`KTI' OF LOS ANGELLS )
I, t.he undersi�ned, Cit� Cle�°l; of the Citi- of 7.,�n�:� rlr.
— hereb} eertifi that the £orrgoi::� resolution ;�as P�ssed and ado,,ted
by- the Ci_t�� Council of t1�e Citt- of L; at: a rr_gu;ur meci.:i<<, I�el�l
on the da� of , 1988.
APES:
\OES:
ABSE\::
Cit;- Cieric, Cit} of ;.}maoud
� � -
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE
THROUGH INFORMAL BIDS OF WATER METERS
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to continue
providing the necessary maintenance to efficiently operate
the City's water system; and
. WHEREAS, line items are provided in the Department
of Public Works Budget for the purchase of materials and
supplies for the maintenance of the water system; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to purchase water meters
worth over $5,000; and
WHEREAS, the acquisition can be more economically`
effected if done through informal bid; and
WHEREAS, under Section 2-62(c) of the L}
Municipal Code, Council can authorize purchases through
. informal bids by a 4/5 vote; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lynwood
does hereby find, proclaim and resolve as follows:
Section i� The Citp Council hereby find and
determine that the purchase of water meters can be more
efficientlp and economically affected by an informal bid
procedure, in that a better price for the acquired meters
could be obtained from that of a formal bid.
Section 2: This resolution shall take effect
' immediatel} upon its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
'. , 1988.
PAtiL H. RICHARDS II, Playor
City of Lynwood
ATTPST:
ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk
APPRO�'ED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTEtiT:
City Attorney JOSEPH Y. WANG, P.E.,
City of Lynwood Director of Public k'arks/City Engineer
C06.970
.� �
DATE: MAY 19, 1988
T0: THE,HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CIT�' COL'KCI
FROM: JOSEPH Y. WANG, P.E., DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORASC��✓-
CITY E�GItiEER
BUBJECT: WATER METER PURCHASE
PURPOSE
To recommend that the City Council adopt the attached resolution
authorizing the purchase of water meters.
BAChGROUND
In the fiscal year 198i, the budget included line items for the
purpose of various supplies and materials to maintain and repair the
City's Water S�-stem.
The City is in need of replacing malfunctioning meters throughout
the City. The City replaces meters year round as part of its
routine maintenance�program. A backlog has now de�eloped and the
purchase of over 180 meters costing over $5,000.00 is now necessar}•.
A'�ALYSIS:
To e�pedite the purchase process, staff has obtained informal t�ids
' for the purchase of the �;ater meters:
H}'drometria Meter Specialist Inc., Long Beach �12,660.57
Parkson Water Compani', Santa Fe Sprin�s �13,3�4.5i
Bill Clanin & Associates, Whittier $16,5-�1.36
B�' authorizing staff to purchase the meters throu�h informal bids,
the acquisition would be more economically effected. L?nder Section
2-G2(cl of the LS'n�:ood Municipal Code, CounciL can authorize
the purchase through informal bids b}� a 4/5 vote.
RECO^f*fE\DATIOti
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached
resolution entitled: "A Resolution of The City Council of The
, City of,Ly Authorizing the Purchase through informal�Bids of
ti'ater Meters."
i
� I
i
I
AGENDA ITEM I
/� �
� �
C06.960 — � ,
I
I
I
. � �
DATE: MAI" li, 1988
T0: THE HONORABLB MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL�
FROM: JOSEPH Y. WANG, P.E., DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/�1�ti
CITY ENGINEER (J °
SUBJECT: FOUR-YEAR TREE MAINTENANCE PROJECT
(FY 1987-88 - FY 1990-911
PURPOSE:
' To recommend that the City Council award a contract to the loc:
bidder for the Four-Year Tree Maintenance Project (FY 1987-88-
Fy" 1990-91 ) . '
BACIiGROliND :
Staff advertised for bids for the Tree Maintenance Project (FY
198i-88 - FY 1990-91). On May 6, 1988, the bid opening was
held in the office of the City Clerk. Bids were received from
the following bidders:
1. California kestern Arborists, Inc., Compton $408,987,00
2. United Pacific Corporation, Santa Fe Springs $412,813.00
3. Golden Bear Arborists, Inc., Irvine $661,230.00
ANALY"SIS:
_ The Cit,v is currently block trimming street trees on a four-pear
cycle. This practice has redUCed the cost to trim street trees
by 50% over the previous spot trimming method. (see attached
mapl.
California Western Arborists, Inc. is the apparent low bidder.
(see attached bid anal}•sis sheet). This contractor was awarded,
and satisfactorilp completed the Tree Maintenance Project for FI`
]986-87 which serviced Area 2. A reference check revealed that
, the contractor has a good reputation and the necessary eaperience
' irr the tree maintenance field. Staff recommends that the
contract be awarded to California Western Arborists, Inc. based
, on their low bid of $408,897.00
A present worth analysis, based on a 3% interest rate was
performed to determine the lowest bidder. (see attached present
worth analysis).
RECOMMENDATION:
Tt is recommmended that the City Council award a contract to the
low bidder, California Western Arborists, Inc., Compton, based on
its low bid of $4A8,897.00, and authorize the Mayor to execute
the agreement.
AGENDA ITEM
CO5.840 � /� -..._� �
__._._____�
c�Tr oF trNw000, caciF � -- --- -- —
11330 BUI.LiS ROAD I PAvE / of /
LYNWOOD� CALIFORNIA B/DDE'RS .ENGIIdIEER'S ' EST/A/ATE
c2i3� �s7_oso o�rE: Si6%�
PROJECT � . I uaiT pRicES, TOTAL PR/CES, � �
/ Z . 3 � Z g �
f�c r•a�c r,te�r �zi.v,a,.✓s- }
HCoJlrG� ~ ♦. I���•�a�eF,e,csT �2i2o� .�x.�'.c �v.� Go�.ne�, ec�c d..-�%wu � '
wiagft+ve✓ � Hv./�Q! /'•rc.f+c. loLP. ��,U �,�
7-s� i— � .•�a�wsr '
�� _ � I Ro, c'3�x /// S�s r:.us.?ia.ru nes�oR�srs, i�vG �i2e� s E i Ate.�.isrs, ..Nc
�o. 9eX ii�
�. � �NU1fi � St�/NbS G�TE 'd'�7 ?.�.&k146s� ROibM6�s.CA 577e 347 7o.bx �T
. 90• 9/ � �; I ��� � , 90G-.7v �v�A.�, �9 cv...l�r.✓, c.r lW.vr?� Ft. 9Afs7� SRV..�e, u 9z713
9eYr s
O I� '
# / EM !
� � � LS L5 /�/ S9 /�/ 7,GJU /fa� y/o, eo ,
, I
�s 1s , G S L S Z 2v/, oo � 9ia. oo ;
f�S �r/t� - L S /'yy o. a�o 3 , Dv v.OV I
z.�a '. F o- i ts � L L S L S � 9/ 8 90, oo p �
� ,
�
� - _
, •
�
,
�
1.0o i3•oo o.00
�
,
�� CITY OF �� a� � o .
�:
� -- -. � LYHWOOD � �
. ' �) i - ±r�ns�sttt� . .
�i' ( � -
�-- A"��� �J�� �I�
a = - •
a -_� �� _ _ _" . ��_ _'__ ,.
� - � � �� � ����
, �i ..�._ �
, � ;� ::,:.n � �� _
;'.,�.;,.: --�'" ' ��1J11J
� r � i� �_::� �:� " � �: f , \ �. " �]� � .
• o° � �: _i � \ c �l /�/���....
, � � --
� �, � � � �
, _ ���� _ � f ____
� , �' y � ' ,�����L71���
� � ___ �,�xl��=� .� � ; �
=�' _ -_��-�,�4J I r
. � � ������
rum � � �ut�ztac reaTnc.T �`�;.� �_ �]��7'- �� �����'��IJ��_` �-�� � , �
_ /� � �
ARFA 3 ( fy 1987-88 ) _!_ 4 ,,,,,� ( �x �� /_ r , � ,.
ARFA 4 ( f�. 1988-89 ) ' N '°� �� ���� 1 _�� // _�' � �
ARF.4 1( Fy 1989-90) � -- r( 'uL ��
��: � _
IaRFA 2 ( fy 1990-91 � � � � � �� �C�i � ��
MAP I� 1 I
— �� __-
-� � E � ._
�_ ' .�, �'`°�`I��. ._- M I
� \ � .��� �
�i � ` , _
,( 'R _ �1
� `+� ! 7 I �_1p �1 , � w
�
' I II �� �"' �
•�-
� �
FOL'R YEAR TREE MAIKTENANCE PROJECT
PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS l � ��,�
� CALIFORNIA ARBORISI
; ; ; CONTRACT ; PRESENT ; N0. OF ; COST
AREA ' FY ' ZONE ' PRICE ' WORTH ' TREES ' PER TREE
� � � � � �
� � � � � �
3 � g�_gg; p ; g16,525.Od; 516,525.00; 1
� � � � � �
� � � � � �
3 ; 87-88; B ; $13,2&2.-00; $13,262.00; ;
� � � � ' '
� � � � , �
3 ; 87-88; C 1 522,545.00; S2Z,545.00; ;
_ , , � � � �
� � � � � �
- 3 ;.87-88; D ; $34,025.00; $34,025.00; ;
� � � � � �
� � � � �
3 ; 87-88; E ; 525,235.00; $25,235.00; ;
� � � , � �
� � � � � � �
; Sub-total:;$111 592.00'$111,592.00; 1981 ; $56.33
, � � � ; r; {56.33)
� � � �
q ; $8-89; A ; $12,155.00; $11,801.29; ;
� � � � � �
� � � � � �
q � gg_gg� g ; $12,155.00; $11,801.29; ; •
� � � � ' '
� � � � � ,
, 4 � 88-89; C ; $12,155.00; $11,801.29; ;
� � � � � �
� � � � � �
4 ; 88-89� D ; 512,155.00; $11,801.29; ;
� � � � � �
� � � � � � �
4 ; 88-89; E ; $12,155.00; $11,801.29; ;
�. � � � , �
� � � � � �
Sub-total:� $60,775.00; $59.006.�5; 1291 ; $45.i1
� � ' ; ; ; � (47.08)
1 � 89-90; A ; 520,780.00; $19,58i.23, ;
� � � ; ' '
� � � � '
1 ; 89-90; B ; $38,250.00; 536,054.45; ;
� � � � � �
� � � , � �
1 ; 89-90; C ; $24,810.00; 523,385.91; ;
, � �
� � � � ,
1 ; 89-90; D ; $33,200.00; $31,294.32; ;
� � � � � �
� � � � � �
1 ; 89-90; E ; $27,600.00; $26,015.76; ;
. � � � � � �
� , , � �
; Sub-total:;$144 640.00'$136,337.6i; 1775 ; $�6.81
, � � � � � (81.491
, � � �
2 ; 90-91; A ; $15,315.00; $14,014.76; ;
� � �, � � �
, , , � � �
2 ; 90-91; B ; $15,315.00; �514,014.76; ;
� � � � � �
� , � � �
2 ; 90-91; C ; $15,315.00; $14,014.76; ;
� � � � � '
� � � � �
' 2 ; 90-91; D ; 515,315.00; $14,014.76; ;
� � � � � �
� � � � � �
2 ; 90-91( E ; 515,315.00; $14,014.76; ;
� � � � � �
� � � � � �
2 ; 90-91; F ; $15,315.00; 514,014.76; ;
� � � � � �
� � � � � �
Sub-total:; $91,890.00; $84,088.56; 1363 ; $61.69
� � I ; � (67.421
GRAND TOTAL:;$408 897.00'$391,024.68;
C06.980 '
� �
FOUR YEAR TREE MAINTENANCE PRQJECT
PRESENT WORTH AKALYSIS �. � �`j�
UNITED PACIFIC CORPORATIOh
; ; ; CONTRACT ; PRESENT ; N0. OF ; COST
AREA ' FY ' ZONE ' PRICE ' WORTH ; TREES ; PER TREE
� � � � � �
� � � �
3 ; $7-88; A ; $29,235.00; 529,235.00; ;
� � � � � ,
, � � �
3 ; 87-88; B ; $29,211.00; $29,211.00; 1
� � � � � �
� � � � �
3 ; 87-88; C 1 528,259.00; $28,259.00; ;
� � � � � �
� � � � � �
3 ; 87-88; D ; $38,512.00; $38,512.00; ; �
� � � � � �
� � � � � �
3 ; 87-88� E ; $21,157.00; $21,15i.00; ;
� , � � � �,
� � , � � �.
` ; Sub-total:;$146,374.00'�146.374.00; 1981 ; 573.89
� � � ; ; ; (73.89)
4 ; 88-89; A ; $8,389.00; 58,144.88; ;
� � � � � �
� � � � � � �
4 ; 88-89; B ; $18,629.00; $18,086.90; ;
� � � � � �
� � � �
4 ; 88-89; C ; 519,306.00; $18,744.20; ;
� � � . � � �
� � � �
4 ; 88-89; D ; $26,708.00; 525,930.80; ;
� � � � � �
� � � � �
4 ; 88-89; E ; $19,169.00; 518,611.18; ;
� � � � � �
� � � � � �
; Sub-total:; $92.2-01.00' �89,517.96; 1291 ; $69.34
� 1 � � I � (71.421
1 ; 89-90; A ; $19,593.00; $18,468.36; ;
� � � � � �
� � � � �
' 1 ; 89-90; B ; S2i,432.00; �25,8b7.40; ;
� � , � � �
� � � � � �
, 1 ; 89-90; C ; $16,852.00; $15,884.70; ;
� � � � � �
, � � �
1 ; 89-90; D ; $20,991.00; $19,786.12; ;
� � � � � �.
� � � � � �
' 1 ; 89-90; E ; $18,923.00; $17,836.82; ;
� � � � � �
� � � � � �
; Sub-total:;S103,791.00; $97,833.40; 17i5 ; �55.12
� ; ; ; ; ; 158.47)
2 ; 90-91; A ; 512,460.00; $11,402.15; ;
� � � � � �
� � � � � �
2 ; 90-91; B ; $13,566.00; 512,414.25; ;
� � � � �
, � � �
2 ; 90-91; C ; $13,426.00; $12,286.13; ;
, � � � � � �
� � � � � �
2 ; 90-9I; D ; $13,006.00; $11,901.79; ;
� � � � � �
� � � �
2 ; 90-91; E ; 56,842.00; $6,261.11; ;
� � � � � �
� � � � � �
2 ; 90-91; F ; $11,147.00; $10,200.62; ;
� � � � � �
� � � � �
; Sub-total:; $70,44i.00; $64,466.05; 1363 ; $47.30
� � ; ; ; ; (51.69)
; GRAND TOTAL:;$412 813.00'$398,191.41;
� C06.981
• • I
�
� �
PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS � = 3 �,
GOLDE\ BEAR ARBORISTS, INC '
�. ; ; CO�TRACT ; PRESENT ; T0. OF ; COST
AREA ' FY ' ZONE ' PRICE ' WORTH ' TREES ' PER TREE
'' ' � � � �
� � �
3 ; 87-88; A ; $25,705.00; $25,705.00; ;
� � , , � �
' ' � � � �
3 ; 87-88; B ; $30,140.00; $30,140.00; ;
� � � � � �
� � � � �
3 ; 87-88; C ; $45,385.00; $45,385.00; ;
� � � � � ,
� � �
, 3 ; 87-88; D ; $63,Q30.00; $63,030.00; ;
� , , , �
� � � � , �
3 � 87-88; E ; $34,150.00; 534,150.00; ;
� � � � � �
� . � , , ,
� �
� , ; � � �.
, ; Sub-total: ;�198,410.00'$198 410.00;1981 ;5100.16
� � � � ;(100.16)
� � �
4 ; 88-89; A ; $9,000.00; $8,738.10; '
� � � , � �
� � � �
4 ; 88-89; B ; $22,060.00; $21,418.05; ;
' ; � � � ,
4 ; 88-8'9; C ( $21,600.00; $20,971.4-�; ;
� �
� ; ; � �
4 �.88-89; D ; $42,945.00; $41,695.30; ;
� , � � �
� � , , � �
� � I 88-89� E ; $23,305.00; 522,626.82; ;
� �
� � 1 ; � �
; Sub-total: ;$118 910.00'S115 �49.71;1291 ; $gg,q3
� � � ; (92.111
� � , �
1 ; 89-90; A ; $39,530.00; $3i,260.98; (
� �
� � � ; � �
1 ; 89-90; B ; �61,080.00; $57,579.01; ;
� �
' ' ' � I �
1 ; 89-90; C ; 528,335.00; $26,708.57; ;
_ � ,
� , ; I � ;
1 ; 89-90; D ; $40,255.00; $3r,944.36; ;
� �
� � � � � �
1 ; 89-90; E ; $35,090.00; $33,075.$3; ;
J � i ' '
I Sub-total: ;$204,290.00'5192 563 75;17r5 ; 5108.49
, � � , , �
' ' � ' (175.09)
2 ; 90-91; A ; $23,785,00; $21,765.65; ; I
, ,
� � ; ; � � �
� ; 90-91; B ; $26,960.00; $24,6i7.i0; I
� , � : i
2 ; 90-91; C ; $29,G05.00; $2i ; �
� � � i
2 ; 90-A;; D ;$26,395.00; 524,154.06; ; i
' , , � � �
2 ; 90-31; E ; $I1,3S0.00; $10,413.8?; ; i
� ,
• � � � ; � , �
2 ; 90-91; F ; $21,495.00; $19,$i0.0i; ; �
� � �
� � � ; � �
, � � , �
� , , i
; Sub-total: ; �139,620.00'S127 766 26 ;1363 ; $93.74 I
' ' ' � I ;1102.44) '
. ; GRA':D TOTAL: ;$661,230.00'S634 189 72; I
�
�
l
�
• �
�
C06.982 �
�
.
�
� � '
--- RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LYNWOOD AWARDING A BID TO CALIFORNIA WESTERN
ARBORISTS,' INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $408,897.00 Fi�R
THE FOUR-YEAR TREE MAINTENANCE PROJECT FOR FY 198i-88
,' TO FY 1990-91
WHEREAS, Staff advertised for bids for the Four-year Tree
� Maintenance project; and
WHEREAS, a bid opening was held on `1ay 5, 1988 and California
Western Arborists, Inc. was the low bidder; and
WHEREAS, a reference check has revealed that the contractor has a
good reputation and the necessary e�:perience in the tree trimming
, field; and
WHEREAS, this contract will comprise a fUll Fcur-Year Tree
Trimming cycle utilizing the block trimming method, as estableished by
` the City-; an3
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lynwood does
herebc find, proclaim, order and resolve as follows:
Section 1. That the contract for the Four-S'ear Tree Maintenance
Project for FT 1987-88 to FT 1990-91 be awarded to California Western
Arborists, Inc., .based on their loc: bid of $408,897.00 and that the
May'or be suthorized to execute the agreement.
Section 2. This resolution shall go into effect immediately upon
° its adoption.
PASSEU, APPRO�ED AND ADOPTED this da5- of
, 1988. "
PAL'L H. RICHARDS II, M�YOR
` City of L,r'nwood
ATTEST:
ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CO?'TENT:
City Attorney JOSEPH Y. MANC, P.E.,
� City of Lynwood Director of Public Works/City
Engineer
' City of L}
CO5.870
� �
DATE: MAY 17, 1988
TO: THE HOUORA$LE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF TSE CIT]' COL'KCIL
, ,', '\
FRO'�I: JOSEPH Y. WANG, P.E., DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORAS('h�p
CITY ENGIhEER J
SUBJECT: PAVEMENT REPAIR PROJECT: VARIOUS LOCATIONS
PURPOSE �
' To recommend that the City Council award a contract to the
lowest responsible bidder for the Pavement Repair Project.
BACKGROLND
This project will provide approximately 5,000 square feet of
asphaltic concrete pavement repair at various locations
throughout the City.
On April 21, 1988, Staff began advertisement for bids for the
Pavement Repair project. On Map 5, 1988, a bid opening was
held in the office of the City Clerk. Bids were received for
the`proposed work from the followinng bidders:
1. Damon Construction Company $34,272.00
� 2. Excel Paving Compan�• $41,434.54
3; Paceco Construction $47,066.88
4. Century Paving, Inc. '$47,699.00
5. Copp Contracting, Inc. $70,686.00
6. Shawnan Corporation �81,586.40
7. Su11y Miller Contracting $99,008.00
This project is funded in the FY 1987-88 Budget with HCDA
funds.
ANAL�'S I S :
� Damon Construction Company is the loc: bidder. A reference
check' of previous performance reveals a good reputation and
the necessary experience. In view of the bid price and the
qualifications of the bidder, it is recommended that Damon
Construction Company be awarded the contract for the Pa��ement
Repair Project.
RECOMMENDATIO\
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached
Resolution awarding a contract to the lowest responsible
bidder, Damon Construction Companti, Gardena, and authorize
the MaS�or to execute the agreement.
AGENDA IT'E![
c05.810 /�
, �
- RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD AWARDING A CONTftACT TO DAh10N CONSTRliCTIOti
COMPANY Ih THE AMOUA'T OF $34,272.00 FUR THE PA�'EME\T
� REPAIR PROJECT 5-5093
WHEREAS, the Pavement Repair project is scheduled for
construction during fiscal year 1987-88, funded by HCDA funds;
' WHEREAS, On April 21, 1988 staff began to advertise for
bids for the Pai�ement Repair project.
WHEREAS, a reference check has recealed that the
contractor has a good reputation and the necessary experience
' in pavement repair; and
' NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Ly
does hereby find, proclaim, order and resolve as follows:
Section 1. That the contract for the Pa��ement Repair
' project be awarded to Damon Construction Company.
Section 2. This resolution shall go into effect
immediatel� upon its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this da} of ,
1988.
PAUL H. RICHARDS II, MAI'OR
- City of L�-nwood
. ATTEST:
. ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk
Cit3' of Lynwood I
I
.
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTEhT: i
;
i
Ci,ty Attorney JOSEPH Y. h'ANG, P.E. ' i
Director of Pubiic N'orks I
. City Engineer i
�
I
. CO5.830 �
� �
DATE: MAY 17� 1988
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND
CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Kenrick 12. Karefa-JOhnson, Interim Director
Community Development Department
�
SUBJECT: ANNUAL REVIEW OF AND REPORT ON
THE LYNWOOD GENERAL PLAN
PROPOSAL
The annual report of the Lynwood General Plan is hereby submitted
for City .Council review. Recommendations from the Planning :
Commission have been incorporated into this final report.
FACTS
California law requires that each city and county adopt a general
plan documenting its decisions concerning the future of the.
community. Preparing, adopting, and maintaining a general.plan
serves to:
o Identify the community's environmental, social, and
economic goals.
o State the local government's policies on the
maintenance and improvement of existing development and
the location and characteristics of future development
needed to achieve community goals.
o Establish within local government the ability to
analyze local conditions and to.respond to problems and
opportunities concerning community development in a way ,
coasistent with local, regional, and state goals and .
policies.
' o Provide citizens with information about their community
and with opportunities to understand and participate in '
the planning and decision-making process of local i
government. �
o Create a basis for subsequent planning efforts, such as
the preparation of specific plans and special studies. �
• Section 65400 of the Government Code mandates as follows: i
'After the *** legislative body has adopted all or part of �
a general plan, the planning agency shall do both of �
the following: i
•(a) investigate and make recommendations to the
legislative body regarding reasonable and
' practical means for implementing the general plan �
or elements of the general plan, so that it will j
" serve as an effective guide for I
*** orderly ** * growth and development, I
preservation and conservation of open space land i
*** and natural resources, and the efficient �
expenditure of public funds relating to the �
subjects addressed in the general plan ***.
"(b) Provide an annual report to the legislative body
on the status of the plan and progress in its
implementation." �
V12:GPRept � �
AGENDA ITEFi i
1 /� ;
. . �r�r�T�-t' 9 I
I
� �
An adequate general plan is one that, beyond meeting tihe minimum
• requirements of state law, establishes a useful guide for local
decision-making. To be legally adequate, a general plan must
address each issue prescribed by state law as it applies to the
community; address each issue through data and analysis, policy,
and an implementation program; be internally consistent and long-
• term; and .cover all territory within the jurisdiction and any
. adjacent related lands, while reflecting the needs of the
regional population.
There is- also a"common sense" standard of adequacy which
requires that the general plan focus on the issues of greatest
Iocal concern, be organized and written in a manner so that it
serves as a clear and useful guide for decision-makers and
citizens, and be available to all those concerned with the
community's development.
In Government Code Section 65302, the Legislature has identified
seven (7) mandatory elements which it believes every City and
County must include in its general plan:
1. The Land Use Element distribution, location, and extent
(including standards for population density and building
, intensity) of the uses of land for housing, business,
industry, open space, education, public buildings and
D 9rounds, solid and liquid waste disposal facilities, and
other categories of public and private uses.
2. The Circulation Element identifies the general Iocation
. and extent of existing and proposed major roads,
highways, railroad and t'ransit routes, terminals, and
other local public utilities and public facilities.
3. The Housing Element consists of standards and plans Eor
the improvement of housing and the provision of adequate
' sites for housing to meet the needs of all economic
, segments of the community.
4. The Conservation Element provides for the conservation,
development, and use for natural resources, including
water, forests, soils, river, lakes, harbors, fisheries,
wildlife, minerals, and other natural resources.
5. The Open-space Element details plans and measures for the
preservation of open space for natural resources, for the
managed production of resources, for outdoor recreation,
and for public health and safety.
6. The Noise Element examines noise sources yielding
information to be used in setting land use policies for
compatible uses and for developing and enforcing a local
noise ordinance.
7. The Safety Element establishes standards and plans for
the protection of the community from unreasonable risks
. associated with the effects of seismically induced
surface rupture, ground shaking, flooding and urban fires j
and other geologic hazards.
1
V12:GPRept I
�
;
I
" i
I
I
z I
i
I
.� �
At its adjourned regular meeting on April 26, 1988, the Planning
Commission accepted the General Plan Report with the
recommendations to the City Council.
' ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
The General Plan is an essential instrument to ensure that the
public welfare is being served, Without it there can be no
rational allocation of land use. It is therefore of great
importance that such instrument is regularly updated to reflect
the changes in the community.
The Lynwood General Plan, adopted in 1977 consisted of the
following nine (9) elements: 1) Community Safety, 2) Noise,
3) Open Spabe, 4) Conservation, 5) Aousing, 6) Circulation, 7)
Scenic Highways, 8) Land Use, 9) Seismic Safety.
State Law has repealed the scenic highway element while the
seismic safety element is incorporated in the safety ,element.
This reduces the number of state mandated elements for the
General Plan from nine (9) to seven (7).
The Lynwood General Plan has undergone several amendments since
its adoption including the addition of a Recreation Element in
1982 and a'complete revision of the Housing Element in 1984. The
Housing Element must be updated or revised every five years.
' Land Use
The City Council adopted one amendment to the Land Use Element
of the General Plan during 1987. This amendment, reflecting
the changes to the Land Use Element of the General Plan, is
� listed below and is shown on the map identified as Exhibit "A."
From To
Light Commercial/ Multi-Family Res.
• Single-Family Res.
The site is located on Imperial Aighway between Fracar and
Alexander Avenues. Although the area was designated Townhouse
and Cluster Housing in the General Plan, the site is surrounded
_ by medium and high density residential uses. Therefore, it would
be appropriate to amend the General Plan to reflect this change
in the existing land uses. Further, the high density residential
development would be a buffer between the commercial land uses to
the west and the medium density developments to the east.
Because Lynwood is fully built-up, changing land use will often
take place through the replacement of structures with new
buildings. This unavoidable process of renewal and replacement
should take place with the least possible disruption to the life
of the city. Trends in family size and socio-economic �
conditions, for example, affect the city's housing and employment
. patterns. These alterations will eventually be reflected in
changed land use patterns. By tracing historical patterns,
surveying current trends, and interpreting future projections, �
' the Land Use Element of the General Plan will identify emerging i
issues to which public policy must respond.
, .
The General Plan establishes the framework for guiding ��,
development within the�City. Future land-use planning efforts �
depend upon the City s ability to effectively implement the �
- V12:GPRept j
�
I
3 �
�
� �
General Plan. There are several tools which have been adopted to
aid in this implementation, e.g., zoning ordinance amendments,
subdivision regulations, building and housing codes, specific
, plans, capital improvement programs and redevelopment. The
following is a summary of the City of Lynwood's participation in
.' and utilization of these techniques during 1987:
A. ZONING
Zoning is considered the primary tool for implementing
the Comprehensive Plan. The establishment of zoning
districts coupled with corresponding development
standards provides the criteria and implementation
• mechamism by which the utilization of land in the City
is brought into consistence with the broader objectives
` of the General Plan.
The Zoning Ordinance establishes the use of
' discretionary permits and cites specific review
procedures as definitive methods for supporting and
enhancing the goals and objectives of the General Plan.
_. Site plan review, conditional use permits, changes of
zone and the abatement of non-conforming uses are
techniques which can be utilized under the ordinance.
The following procedures were utilized during 1987 as a
means of maintaining consistency with the General Plan.
. Procedure Number of Cases
Zone Change Z
Conditional Use Permit 47
Site Plan Review and Approval 35
Variance 2
In addition, three (3) appeals were submitted to the
' City Council for consideration; the appeals sought a
reversal of the decisions of the Planning Commission
approving residential developments, a5 well as certain
uses in the commercial zones.
B. SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
The process of subdividing land has a substantial '
effect on the development of a city; the division of
- land is 'one of the most irreversible actions that a
local government can undertake. Once approved, lot
lines become difficult to modify, even though there are
mechanisms for doing so under the regulations of the
State of California Subdivision Map Act.
A subdivision ordinance was approved and adopted by the
City Council in December, 1985, to specifically provide
regulations for subdivision processinq and development
within the City. The inclusion of the Subdivision
, Ordinance in the Zoning Code emphatically improves
the City's ability to respond effectively and
positively to requests for subdivisions or parcel maps.
V12;GPRept
4 .
� �
The City approved the following subdivision actions in
1987:
Action Number of Cases
Lot Line Adjustment �
Tentative Parcel Map 13
Lot Mergers (less than four �
lots into a single parcel)
Lot Unmergers (into less than O
� four original parcels)
C. SPECIFIC PLANS
Specific Plans represent refinements to the General
Plan. They are useful planning tools for areas
expected to undergo either public or private
-- redevelopment (or in many cases development at new
intensity or character). Specific Plans describe in
detail how an area is expected to be developed complete
with criteria and development requirements.
Although no new specific plans were initiated in 1987,
it is hoped that this technique will be utilized €or
several areas, especially in those sections of the City
which are targeted for redevelopment.
D. BUILDING AND HOUSING CODES
The City has adopted the latest editions of the �
Uniform Building Code and the Uniform Plumbing Code;
the Uniform Mechanical Code; the National Electrical
Code and State of California Housing Code. These codes
regulate building and safety.
During 1987, an aggressive program of Code Enforcement
was maintained, concentrating on violations and
potential violations within the residential, commercial
and manufacturing areas of the City. This program is a
means of implementing the Housing Element and Community
Safety Element of the General Plan.
E. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The Capital Improvements Program is a tool which can be
used to implement the Land Use, Circulation and
Recreation Elements of the General Plan. Included are
programs such as street and sidewalk improvements, park
improvements, development of public facilities and
landscaping programs.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS COMPLETED
Calendar Year 1987
5046 Bus Stop Improvement
SA61 Water System Relocation
5062 Aandicap Modification
V12:GPRept
. 5
� �
5063 Alley Zmprovements
5064 Street Improvement -Brenton Avenue
. 5070 Street Improvment - Norton Avenue
5071 Street Improvement - Los Flores Boulevard
5072 Alley Improvement - Atlantic Avenue
5074 Alley Improvement - Shirley Avenue
5075 Street Improvement - Century - Atlantic to Abbott
5077 Slurry Seal
5078 Sidewalk & Wheelchair Ramps
5081 Sidewalk Reconstruction
' S099 Street Improvement - Elizabeth and Virginia
5102 Christmas Decorations
F. REDEVELOPMENT ,
Redevelopment is one of the most powerful tools
available to local governments to implement their
General Plans. In instances where the private sector
alone is unable or unwilling to asseemble Tands and
reinvest the necessary capital for revitalizing
blighted or underdeveloped areas, the redevelopment
process is a means of transforming a deteriorated area
into a more productive one.
In 1987, The Lynwood Redevelopment Agency approved the
development plans for two shopping centers:
1) Imperial Highway and Long Beach Associates,
. Location: 11118-50 Long Beach Boulevard
, (See Attachment B.)
This project is the first within the Project
Area "A."
2) Lynwood Towne Center; Hopkins Lynwood
Associates.
. Location: Long Beach Boulevard between
• Imperial Highway and Fernwood
Avenue. (See Attachment C )
The development of a 114,000 sq. ft.
commercial/retail project
- -.�- w _
' 6
� �
G. REVISING AND AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN
The General Plan is a dynamic document because it is
� based on community values and an understanding of
existing and projected conditions and needs, all of
which continually change. Local governments should
plan for change by establishing formal procedures for
regularly monitoring, reviewing, and amending the
_ general plan.
The portions of the plan with a short-term focus, such
as the implementation program, should be reviewed
annually and revised as necessary to reflect the
availability of new implementation tools, changes in
funding sources, and the results of monitoring the
effectiveness of past decisions. The entire plan,
incTuding the basic policies, should be thoroughly
reviewed at least every five years and revised as
necessary to reflect new conditions, local attitudes,
and political realities. The housing element must be
reviewed and updated at least every five years (Title
25, California Administrative Code Section 6472).
Obviously, the longer the interval between revisions of,
' the General Plan, the greater the effort and extent of
each revision.
If the Planning Commission or City Council finds itself
making frequent piecemeal amendments, major defects may`
occur in the general plan, because values and needs may
have changed or the plan may have become too inflexible
, and precise. In these cases, the jurisdiction should
not further erode the plan through amendments.
Instead, it should undertake a major revision.
In reviewing proposals for general plan amendments,
• local officials should remember that the general plan
is a policy document for the entire community and that
it may be amended only "in the public interest'
(Government Code Section 65356.1). In other words, the
plan should be amended only when the city, with the
support of a broad consensus, determines a change is
necessary, not merely because a property owner or group
of citizens desires the amendment. Every general plan
amendment, additionally, must be consistent with the
rest of the general plan or appropriate changes need to
be made to maintain consistency.
The City of Lynwood General Plan in its present form is
nearing its eleventh year as the policy document
guiding the City's growth process and except for the
Housing Element, it has not been completely and
methodically revised to reflect changing patterns in
the growth of the community. Several "piecemeal"
- amendments have been instituted to the plan.
In light of the need to have a viable,. comprehensive
planning tool, a consultant has been retained to
prepare a Request for Proposal (RFP), in order that a
a complete major revision of the entire General Plan be
undertaken as soon as possible.
V12:GPRept
7 °
� �
RECOMMENDATIONSt
Staff respectfully requests that the City Council consider the
following recommendations which have been suggested by the
` _ Planning Commission for Council's consideration:
1) Revise the entire General Plan with the following
Elements included: Land Use, Circulation, Housing,
Conservation, Open Space, Noise, Safety, Economic
� Development, Recreation and a Community Design Element.
2) Prepare revisions to the Housing Element as necessary,
� ensuring that its programs, policies and procedures are
consistent with an overall update of the other
elements.
3) Conduct a detailed revision of the Land Use Element to
_, reflect changing community needs and modifications in
the Zoning Ordinance, establishing a consistency
between the two and the actual land use.
4) Include the Century Freeway (Z-105) into the
circulation element reflecting the impacts of the total
transportation artery on the intersecting and
complementing street system. Coordinate this element
with the Land Use Element addressing changes in land
' uses along the freeway and identify new land use
opportunities.
5) Restructure the Noise Element to reflect the impacts of
the Century Freeway on land uses adjacent to the right-
of-way and establish criteria for mitigation of any
impacts.
6) Establish a Community Design Element to develop a
consistent, viable and distinctive community image
incorporating the mult,iple facets of design techniques
and standards. Prepare a criteria of standards for
aesthetics and design in conjunction with �the Zoning
Ordinance.
7) Prepare an Economic Development/Redevelopment Element
which serves as a guideline and framework for the
City's economic development and redevelopment efforts
" delineating policies, programs and implementation
plans.
8) Establish an Energy Policy as a part of the General
Plan under the Conservation Element.
9) Conduct public study sessions or workshops to discuss
and -develop a vision of Lynwood's future, as well as
defining goals for each element of a new comprehensive
General Plan.
- 10) Prepare specific plans for the Long Beach Boulevard
Commercial Corridor (including the Commercial Center
site -- Lynwood Towne Center) and the Alameda
Industrial Corridor.
8
� �
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests, if it is the Council's
pleasure, to direct staff to report back to the Council on:
, (a) a planning work program to implement any or all of
the above recommendations;
(b) projected costs and sources of funding; and
(c) drafts for Request for Proposals to solicit the required
planning consulting services; or
(d) City Council review and file the 1987 General Plan
Report.
I
, �
!
�
i
i
I
I
. I
V12:GPPG9 �
�
�
!
�
9
, �
� . . p � /30 ?a i30. Ja . � .
so � O S � 12 � so
. .. W i32 c2 /30 ai (y f
Q Q s BLK. A Q i i Q
/3050 /3C.49
O
. - . � O 7 '�O �� � .
' Q /30. 5B /3s! 5! ?
Q O � 9 q`�
� . /9J S o /30. G 5 Q a . .
O
�q .f8� m i�
� O � � 2z � r 'J p�
� � � /30.7.6 h /30.7.3 � � . .
' h /0 2 t� ��} O
h
/30. B£ �3o B/
. ' ii 3 z1 � 3
/9G 9 /30. B9
� 4 � 12 :
0
�
W
� - - -Z-
Q �
V ,� sa X
, - _ � Q i0.793°` � (1.J �
� , •� J
�` 9. a 10 . q Q
. SO � Poc SO
,. � . . � � c
�a
? 50 3569
�c
O � O
d �
,.
.
• IMPERiAL HWY.
�,�.�t.
i �xH1�IT M A�► ~
,
�
, .
�
. � �
. � �� �.:��� :� :��.��,� ,��1�.,�� f�
� r'. .? �. }l � � / ,J1�iv r� Sa � re� u°� sa f� 1 I "" a ,�° v � s„"w �� »`��.
�. '�y � 0' > C a � ��. �� a l�l a.d � o I \� ol�'N�i
� y �
- ��.�rv•� 'r � �U. �-0:�:; , aT3�� \ ,0{° y � r-'! �"� � -r, r�l r., I nl MJ ^,t� ^ i
� I �`Ti'f..���.� .�v �_.Ls=LLS/� ii . �\ � M �n �� � ^i M' r�� n �� �"�'
, . � n. ' � I � I � ; '
�-`, 2 �vc�+v[ � /� a�l • i I L__y i �
~ Y G ��� � V ^�.� I� 3I. � � u1 n _'_ _� _' ; , � '1 �
o I
„ � ; �i a i�,. i i. . �, , � 3 a , � , J , � 'r
" ' �2° � ��,�� r � K� � � F I_ 1.' 1 v I��
�� � I ti1 �. � Zii;� ! 3 j„ a� Y�a`�� �' r� N G�a�� h c.. r' k: � ii �'� ��
i: _^ � �`�' ."i e, � ^"1� �
,�� � I -� � � , y ,., �„ � �, a � , � I „� .., �, i
'�,� � r- ' '�' -��-� '� �' :��r-'�'• /og'' � "� "' c , � ^ h I M � �, � ,.J r ., •
Ty �^ �_.'� tr�� �.��Y� R. � '
♦ M I
. ;I?�� v Q, .� � .�tiV� r�i ,.�. i ,. �J, C ,f., ��[_� C.:---•a''"e �! __�
_._ ..t__�) _:H:.t.�.._ i
. ' � � S n Ti :� �., • _.
..� �,�. �_ .�
� �.+•�e � vsi -�'l;7'..^,n._� � ....� -
� -r ` "_ : ._ 7 "�'.' �" Y J t� � v sn I Ja �o � �.,ri �'�'i}' � •J i c „ i.
.. � �...�i � .I� , ,^I �^ �d '�� '�c�•�J,�' �� r� � w ^s ,, � l I �„ I f-�i , � �.�..� �r �-,� �-
(' � < � �y n I � ��
r� � �IJ; � �^�^j' � �.�'T `-3'.� n in n �" -i , .� � ,.�I h '„ tti ���.
qdles 77,� ,r� :aJ .:4. � a �¢C �y' ' �h t�� n.,
� '� 21 .� ' : f�o.� :7 , � ./�� r� n;� ro �c� n ,� I r� u ir .
.. � .�� .I�_ :�`�"PN� . yML l✓� I �� I I I � . ' I .
i � / v 7 ��
T nW�vr ; :, � � J � � t � � I__.:—I __
• I • J , �� ] I � j Tl �� V MJX �^.��.� �.� -y� I I
Ti ^{ N�� y. �I U I�� ��� a 7� � � I I
. rJYJ( '� I.vyl�h �� 1� �..�� 4.:i�{I � y r � "� �r ��� �-:� � r, I �- �., c" I
� � '��� I � y �' � zu /� .o::� n .j ^ ^ Ja ,^� �, �a� � � � �� � �s ';
I � O f O) Y 4• r I M . � I � � 1 ~ I n � I �' � I�
V I '� � i� �� ,1.�(1�-ro -�' c ' t I " t h M �`+ (`l
�� � ` �
. y f .�I I� � +� I " ~ � �� 4. � IP%� Ja s+"':. s� j s+ ol I��
I I � � � �� � o � ,� •ri��y __T___.., _--
• A x'��» .��a. :r�: h��.y..�.�..�L'a�� ��� �' LOS fLOkE'S ---- -
�� ��M�-j L � �a' I N IH �'�� Tr?�f�.j'W � � • rs� ' J F �: 3 �: �, '^ �"..�
� �0. s '�" . ➢i. L[' �C'_.. 14� � i � . �., C .4��� M1 Y ,� ^ � ,� _ , � I ? � � '�
. :��= �— , �' _,' � ��i "oI �)J � m 7C 17 � �l ^��
. � , ^:---*±, : ,�r. W p�y �u 75 N� �iU . 9 � ''J �: �r'S O � i � I
: i^ :ti� , � �' . v.'' �,�� . a .,. C bl ,
- �:,� I� �' i�l �.� � r < 6 �nn �_
, 't I: 7.1��(I U�i��(5 io�Pll��l � ���i�� 5 ' R;i ::0 � )1 � . p � . �.! tii�� iieief ` ` i�T:.
� t I J '' � S � � � \
'~ � � 1 _� �\ � �� 1
� I ,I I 9 I i '. I �� Q\ �' t,� — ,.'' �' � \ \ \ i � � ��9 �
I ` ` ' , � � � � .\ � i�1 - � >
I J I .I I� Z'��� ,�b � � ?. � >
I ' � 't) � i)l c�,,;� � \ 1r
. s� vlx'ss9�.s� .,�!v�ai r..n��c��� i�l:;;+i ��t �u� •w r r i,a ���, �„� ,., ,
� � �S: I �Iv , I� : � �- I l �.�� � ' � � ��:� ".�`'a~Y:�„�'.'�'•.r,""���
� � �'^ I'� I"1 I^ R', I`.i"3; nl 1",�:�., �j� � K.. e N�C ^�� ji� { 1
C �t 1 „ 1
. . . ' J ��"'i.'':."` � �� p �'� � � �5 .'. fj���� . ��V, '
---� ' tMr:
_� _- � �ti, , ;:: ;;.;. `. ''. r , _„_..
' : � s: � - � < — .I' yl`:n.. .�. � C �� .::: �. �:.'S ��' . .
" `.�� � I � ti t ��g r=;.�S�-�:...��
,�� I .: �� ��y 4' I :� `.-' j�` �w , �:��r �.,�
t )4i 1� L' �'Si �.SIJJ 2�� t.:;J: !1!iGL I •�� G'e K�� �I�i� �1 � 5� � / 1
r r j � �•
4�i 1 � I�i � 1 I. I�. , �\ .
�� :l .^� -. .J �-."` Y l i�
� . I "� . .� '� I _��_ � � '^ �`� n �c :' `� ?l. :Z �\ I�� �� °t> �/ I ��:`
T �'. � y ` " fi�'� r' I � �� 3 �� ,C..�_1 _
�I � I� �. �� I I I� a'�1 �1 a p x �i�=ii7�I�Q�;,A �,�,T� �7) \ }.(�/��': I
- 1:IL iT "� ��� � I C�'� � G � � ! l y,�`�'�. Sr ' I �
�� " � ��� �ld� � � lf:i
� , u �,.�::t � 4-
� - � i�� + 'II. 1 . �7'.� .
. . ' �5:��.��y . I �...�.9 'Ii � c It .' � 1 S ' � ;a �_" ; ,/, ...
, �..:. , ` ��y � ��,
. . - � n ' �''� �,� 11 l}� 14 - � A �i'%:.i e �; �' ..' •
� _ i A �16 i �� - a �
� • �c �j� p6 A... .�i•� �v' ..
i ti :' � I .. � '�,• '��: �b . ��,,; � �t�, v -� �;,, �,, " eEecH; oc�
i i I� :�.; � L� tiI --i'�i-a �>� '�: 'v � '? f ',j � � ^ 'T
. . Sl W�ll L.'}wlll!£��.U'"I�^III���..}�� � `- �^ou^a'.
. I � � i I �; �lil� ,,,,, �i� - � ,� �I�.
�--'--` I ' I � � � ' , ,', 't'� , ^�t '� �c,
+ ` � � r.i 9. � ^. tii' z
.. IIlIC:�i! :� 7l l�l., ` I .I� �� ���� � �„ , �� � � � �l� m .^, E �� t�� _ � �
� '� • U .� � .
:�y �i � �.i ,J " I nl h � 'r� ` �J � t' �
1 ���' �^ y �� 1=; �� ��=, �n�..:`1: ��v � , '� �� �� ��-�
� ' \' u � �
sa., . ., y,." ,,le � I
. , o ^ c N� • �n .
� .. .. �......r��>-�nv . . I`.` a�7� �.� • c � � ' ly0 •.y y-'�� � _ !`�'.
.r =i �;o t.� � i o �" i
�_ L t' 1 1
�.iJ
. . „ � '��=J ^= � o � - �V; ' � � ! V� .. R � ��"• `,' ;T ,,�] � _ . .
, . C!, �
�`�� y'-..� / hJJ fl+ I17 )I,: jJ5 �..;L p� \ \ ir%' C
�`\ / � ±J:` ^\�f^�/Ji^ �.
. . I I.. �,(���' �� I ;� y \ ti \ \ t' 'Y%'1 � � �
M � :! I � /
,� ��lY��.:�/ I •... �:'�.�, Y l� � ��i
. � i .; � y�"i � ,� s \ � t � G
; - f � .,'_ ��'� -� � "► . I ^ . I ... I .. . i . I ". I ..�� �.. � . , \ :K �,=� ,.�� �� ��� `� -. ,
� r'
. � �i'1> I'i� r .
.,
. A'i'i'ACI?�%1�rJT �����
_..._ ._.......-------_. --- ---
__. ,
� � . .. ;
�.'��y�� ���J�� a�����'1r�
----- .... ....__.......___._......----�--- -� -- --- --
� � � . �o: ,�oA�= — � L
�—�„—,,;� .� ---�-
u � ��v �. � ;I ' ; �' j i _ .�... i �''--
- oo M '1 ' R � ^ .• � . � : ,�K �
- . d r� ��e 7y �' 7 �� a r
� . . ,,;`�n. �. �. , . v��: `. �� y +i �.� Y �.� 7� inl ¢� i.l i I � � ;1i �� �
c >
•. . .��1 O �I Y I iF;ll.17'11 tl I I.C.Y I :J 19 "J , 1� � l 7 �1 W - n� '.J.— 1C. S
L : 1 � � � � � �'�� r� I ,�.. ' � ��'' ,::,. � � r = : �;
. " , � I p�� 'ti,a e - ; �.'+ ,, �` . '� 117 • �.'O 'r � � i,.f ,;
I a
� ����u q �x .yy y�y 7i �o�r'� ii ` u I �t +73:j CI <1 p n: » 0 ^1._ ��1 My ^� � N n. yu f!
� . i:i �I I �7 1�� �.: i^;I � ���1.,�^J L � � a �� , Qy � �;� „\ y'��Y�Jf� J�L�� � `�
. .TL�"7" h i .
�. :,. . . ' _ 7 r . T-, . . .. ` � ' n w' y .. lyP rtt,-� r
�,. •�.��,(� �.. �f.� '� I�� L y� 1 C a' x v � y� Y��v'i � � 4�"
� ( 1 �!i � ��f i_ I Y'�� I � I A .a � W a� �.3 � T � '� ) y � ,4� � ' :� u T� '
i, � a il � v i:�^ ,` y � ,� P . � 4 I � � ° i
i i I I �i�l..� � q � :il � � ✓'� (� �rt 1. �y 1 N�n � �I1Y �
,_,�,�� �r,�.;i�..� � .� �, �� :� �„�.� ,n � �;� - � �, �
�� ' � � ;
� �� 1'�r�� t�ri �'�I�� �..,�-Y N� ,� � !
. . r-�;� , . ,+ ' ,
. , � n l ; r� , ,�.
�' � ��. -7�
� - j1 ;r �N � i ili `�\� , n w�„w i` � �r r l'� ir� ��
� . � T '�� 7 :�.:� - i" ` y .7 a,� �•. � ;'', � � _.1.'_l.�l t� ..
� ^I ' ��� I .'�` y . ' ,� N t�' tlFfGh%�'o00
� . � J Y 4:1 .' y ... . i J +�'ll A tl Q 4 -�✓^ ��.�_' . Az � r ..' (
� � y � 1� {
` 7� r ,� s �, ti :1 a �, I �
g�� al 4 b m °� ' �," t�3^ec� , 2 r.� !x r {_
- o e i �� p a�i�a e e v.v ' v • I� a af w� u u ,3 ° I '� '�
. i � ^I/ '�f... . a I ll' �' 3 i� . y �. �_ l_� ' _7
� �
,, i i n�l�,
� � � , , � � ����
, ,�-„ r -,,�m .,� � �. ' � �, • u!, � „�,
;la �u• �_� �f�� „ �N '�; �
.7� ��� �., u� � ' ,°' `' � r � � � � 'y � i •" 1 ' + � ; ":.:
, . = � � � i ' '�• V � 12�L_l._.LS:L. _
. l� �u't-' �Ct i .��1. � HUOa.M
� , . `�, � ,7 d —�- -
, � x,� �, C c � I ^ 1 �'
J i h p h. J ��):: � ;
� � d H3 I J L31 �' L?-' �.
t rt
�.
I
i-
'..
4...
•�
� ,�. ,�yn ;�l .:.;':....'' e ,—f C
. � �' U .�,'�r.,..,.�:'..:.' � �� , _ 1U1 � �
i ��� ���� � � r
if
�. �
1
� I. r
\ �
�
� 1 i 47
)
��
h \ I
�
� .�'11 �%U. � ,�. s.� �
� n `i=' �,a w au ''� +' � — r
t: �
_
� t':
l 1
...y...�::: "....
... q� ..:...:. ....:•. : � :4, n . .
� . .. r � '�+.� ...: ... � _
..`.g. 5...... .'......'f.;..... '
� _ .,�� ...... .�...��' ,�'�,..., lr. 111 J,u. .l.
. . ,.� � �l�" ,.� � �"� a I �
. t I � � . � � �.: a ��'+,Tf } �.;.:. .:. � _ � 1++
� a Y . � �.'`*W .;.....:..�... '�.q..... ..� u I
� y �-�ti. .i ..,."'l�.y. . m ` �.. wr ,:
y �'��'���:��;..�..���...'�.�'.��..:��"�.:��-,
r
i _
J � Z .7 i�� � ... ,�rt 'L_.:.e� L_
I � I �' ��b � ry �.,; ....."�ciy ...'��.''.., �} +��� OAO
�4 ''`�j�. Y
f N J w +y�
. i . "�` � �t N + �
I I 7 \
�'. . C � i J`�f"� y' n � + /� W/ �� v s� h�� �'"�
. � ���i� .. � �.r.� � . � �.: �.�'�.... �.. .,.'...... � . .W'" C ��� i4J .�J � �
\�..... ' ✓ � �
. r m a Y ."��" �6n ` - L��oi'o4 ' En 'uC f z / r'� �.(I� .-�
� 'r u/�'' �fES '' . .`/j . �'' �'�'�..�a i � 1 ��r-1.•=' �
/ • �` q ' , �l •KS1., �"
/ � � .f ` �� i • , �,Y /, Y
, J'J.s / �JY� � / ciya�'��1�..� �� 4,3�.`.,)�O.
, ! �a�1� i / ., . ,ua i ✓'��/ Y :• rh �
I �� ' ` �� 'l'1✓.� ' /'� ' � 2� � .i� ti 1;� � (...
� � + .\ .7'JS % • Yra.•' o � � y�� ��._�wl..
i I �LIt�������.`. �. ` '�'T . N C ' i�d/ ��
/I � : w q •N-' , '✓
_ / � `L ��1 / /\l�;� . 4 � � 'T / ,� �j�aC.i � r �
I. � ( J�� j ���;�4� \\ � ,� ���� �
J '�
� .� .`� o� �� �'�- �
a�
. 'K.tc� . - � !� � 14 '.���'=�'. ]� \
� . r ��
� "7
� � `�
� �
E ,
' - . � . . .. . �i
.�.
�
I .
I _ ATPA�'I ��C��
....:. -----�... . . __... .. _..__ . .... ._ ..
. .._.__.. . _..-----=----'.
, � �
DATE: May 17, 1988
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL i'�
� � n -
FROM: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Interim Director. ��
�l�,i, „
Community Development Department � ��
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROGRAM `�`��
PROPOSAL:
, To request that the City Council review and approve a General
Plan Update Program including the formation of a General Plan
' Advisory Committee and Consultant Selection Board. To request and
approve the attached RFP (Request for Proposal) and authorize
Staff to begin the consultant selection process.
FACTS:
1. The Lynwood General Plan has not been updated since 1977,
with the exception of the Housing Element which was updated
in 1985. A comprehensive update and revision of the General
Plan presents an.excellent opportunity for the community to
more clearly define its goals and objectives in meeting the
challenges in the years ahead. The updated General Plan can
act as a catalyst to social and economic change, provided it
has the support of the City Council and the community at
large.
Also, in addition to the foregoing, preparing, adopting, and
maintaining a general plan serves to:
o Identify the community's environmental, social, and
economic goals.
. o State the local government's policies on the maintenance
and improvement of existing development and the location
and characteristics of future development needed to
achieve community goals.
o Establish within local government the ability to analyze
� local conditions and to respond to problems and
I opportunities concerning community development in a way
consistent with local, regional, and state goals and
policies.
o Provide citizens with information about their community
and with opportunities to understand and participate in
the plann'ing and decision-making process of local
government.
o Create a basis for subsequent planning efforts, such as
the preparation of specific plans and special studies. .
2. To successfully accomplish the preparation of a
. comprehensive update of the General Plan, it is essential
that the goals of the community be clearly defined. These
_ goals should originate from within the City itself and
should be clearly stated and understood before a consultant
is' selected to prepare the General Plan. We are, there£ore,
recommending the formation of a General Plan Advisory
Committee comprised o£ seven (7) members including the
following:
Disk 5:Geplanup
AGENDA ITE'�i
1 �q
• �
' Mayor, City Manager, Director of Community Development, a
Project Manager, and representatives from the Public Works
Department, Fire Department, and Recreation Department.
. Once the General Plan Advisory Committee has determined the
major goals and objectives of the General Plan, a separate
- panel will be formed to interview and select the consultant
- who will prepare the update to the General Plan. The.members
of thi-s panel (Consultant Selectiom Soard) will be comprised
of three (3) from the General Plan Advisory Committee.
- 3r An RFP (Request for Proposal) and cover letter (attached)
have been prepared and will be mailed to ten (1�) pre
' selected consulting firms. The RFP solicits proposals to
prepare the updated General Plan and includes the following
majoz elements:
A. Cover Letter and Invitation to Submit
B. Project Description
C. Scope of Work
D. Public Participation Process
E. Project Phasing
F. Submittal Requirements .
'� G. Selection Process
In addition to the update of the General Plan, the
Consultant will be asked to prepare a supporting
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and new Economic
Development/Redevelopment and Community Design Elements.
4. The work on the General Plan Update will be coordinated by a
Project Manager in the Community Development Development
Department. The Project Manager will take the lead role in
c000rdinating the work of the General Plan Advisory
Committee and Consultant Selection Board. The Project
Manaqer will also be responsible for directing the work of
the consultant and for making sure the General Plan is
'- completed in time and within budget.
Recommendation:
. That City'COUncil adopt the attached Resolution (1) forming the
General 'Plan Advisory Committee and Consultant Selection Board;
, and, i2) directing Staff to issue the RFP for the update of the
General Plan.
� Attachments:
RFP and Cover Letter
Disk S:Geplanup
i
. 2
� ,
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING FORMATION
OF A GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE
- AND CONSULTANT SELECTION BOARD AND
DIRECTING STAFF TO ISSUE A RFP
(REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL) FOR THE UPDATE
OF THE GENERAL PLAN.
WHEREAS, the City of Lynwood seeks to update its General Plan
and,
WHEREAS, the C'ity Council has determined that an update of
the General Plan will be socially economically, and
environmentally benefical to the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council approves the following;
Section 1. The City Council authorizes formation of a General
' Plan Advisory Committee comprised of seven (7) members including
the Mayor, City Manager, Director of Community Development,
Project Manager, and representives from the Public Works
Department, Fire Department, and Recreation Department. The City
, Council also authorizes the formation of a Consultant Review
and Selection Board consisting of three (3) members including the
City Manager, Director of Community Development, and Project
Manager.
Section 2. The City Council directs staff to issue the RFP
(Request for Proposal) for the update o£ the General Plan.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 1988.
PAUL RICHARDS, II MAYOR
_ City of Lynwood
ATTEST:
. ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kenrick Karefa-Johnson
Interim Director City AttoYney
Community Development Dept.
Disk 5:Geplanre
1
� � !
� ��ty o �YNwooD
i S � �( �
� ; y a ��111A�� "
'' U `� �� � �� City �teeting ChaQQenges ° '
' ` �� / A r'� ., �.:
3 0. • C� r
11330 BULLIS ROAD
� �� IF '� LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262 �
` � s' ..
. �� (273) 603-0220 -
RE: Request for Proposal for
; Preparation of an Update
and Revision of the City
',_. of Lynwood General Plan.
' Ladies and Gentlemen:
The City of Lynwood invites you to submit Proposals for
professional services to update and revise the 1977 Lynwood
General Plan, including the Environmental Impact Report.
Proposals will be accepted.at the office of the City Clerk until
4:00 p.m. on July 25, 1988. The General Plan revision is financed
through Community Development Block Grant funds. The total cost
�of the project including:the E.I.R. and all technical support and
professional services are not to exceed $185,000.00.
At the completion of the project, the City intends to use the .
revised General Plan to analyze, update, and revise its existing
Z'oning Ordinance to be consistent with the new General Plan and
the changing. conditions of the City. A separate Request For
Proposals will be issued at that time.
Purpose•
" The purpose of the General Plan Update Program is to: '
1. To develop a forward-looking document which establishes
, goals and objectives for the City's growth and devleopment. ,
2. To develop a current socio-economic and land use data base.
3. To identify the issues that affect the way growth and
development occur over the next 20 years.
� Disk 6:,Geplanit
�: ,
�,
>
, f:
r ..
�:
Q:
�.
r :
FL
. y ',,
�.
5 . .
C . .
E
i'.
'� .... ..... .. . .. ... . . . � �. ' . .. . .. . . . . .
� .. :. �._......�_... ..�....... . ....»_. . . .. .
• olicies which reflect the•City's goals and
q, To evaluate the p
objectives.
' S, To develop a General Plan which is internally consistent,
meets the requirements of State Planning Law, and provides
' the basis for implementation of the Plan's policies.
6, To develDesignWElementsic Development/Redevelopment and
Community '
7, To provide the supporting Environmental Impact Report (EIR):
Focus of the Work Program:
In addition, to updating, revising, and reorganizing the seven
mandatory elements of the General Pla arts t of the
be expected to devote substantial p
Plan to the following: ,
� 1, Analyzing the•impacts of the City's population growth and
the current 2oning versus the actual land use trends.
z, Developing a realistic and achievable strategy for solving
these problems and for developing favorable economic
conditions within the community.
Work Program:
`' The work program shall consist of the following main elements:
1,, Review existing data and compile new data from field
surveys. Data should be in a computerized format that can
be used on the City's computer system.
z, Prepare a draft updanewCepoliciesn and Eprepareentol correct
Report proposing
existing deficiencies and guide the future development o
the City.
3, Develop Commnnity Design ana Emarket analysisenofReexistin9
ment Elements including
economic conditions within the community.
'. 4, Implement a program for public participation in the General
Plan process.
� 5, Provide a phasing program for the completion of components
of the updatied General Plan.
Disk S:Geplanit "
i
' ,�;
:`:
_ . �
;
si
i.
� �
About the City:'
The Cit,y Lynwood is located ten miles south of downtown Los
, Angeles,' in Los Angeles County. Lynwood is approximately five
square miles, bounded on the north by the City of South Gate, on
the south by the City of Compton, on the east by the cities of
° Downey and Paramount, and on the west by portions of both
unincorporated Los Angeles County and the City of Los Angeles.
Approximately 54,100 people reside in the City.
Submittal Requirements and Deadline:
Twelve (12) copies of all proposals shall be submitted to my
attention at:
Office of the City Clerk
City of Lynwood
11330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, CA. 90262
by A:00 p.m., on July 25, 1988.
The formal RFP is attached for your review. A pre-proposal meeting
will be held on June 20, 1988, in Bateman Hall at 2:00 p.m.
Bateman Hall is located at same address as indicated above.
above location.
If you have any questions regarding the RFP or the preposal
meeting, please call us at (213) 603-0220 extension 291 between
2:00 p.m. through 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday.
Sincerely,
Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Interim Director
' ' Community Development Department
Disk S:Geplanit
z:;
..;
,.:,
;y
1::
Y.;
yl
Sf
•y.(.
?�;;
, �;
'
s�.
`;
� �
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR UPDATING THE
CITY OF LYNWOOD GENERAL PLAN AND RELATED DOCUMENTS
I, PURPOSE
..:' .__
The purpose of this Request for Proposals (RFP) is to select
a' planning consultant (or professional team) capable of
providing the necessary services to update and revise the
Lynwood General Plan to coordinate the planning for
municipal services and development within the context of the
General Plan and to use the Plan to direct the City's growth
and create a viable economic development climate. In
addition to updating the existing General Plan and the
supporting Environmental Impact Report (EIR), the selected
Consultant will be responsible for the development of new
Economic Development/Redevelopment and Community Design
Elements. At the completion of the project, the City
intends to use the revised General Plan to analyze, update,
and revise its existing Zoning Ordinance to be consistent
with the new General Plan and the changing conditions of the
City. A separate rfp will be issued for the revision of the
Zoning Ordinance.
It is expected'that the General Plan revision, and the
preparation of the two (Z) new elements, will be completed
in 12 months from the signing of the contract.
II. CITY BACKGROUND
The City of Lynwood is located ten miles south of downtown
Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County. Lynwood is
approximately five square miles, bounded on the north by the
City of Southgate, on the south by the City of Compton, on
the east by the Cities of Downey and Paramount, and on the
• west by portions of both unincorporated Los Angeles County
and the City of Los Angeles. Approximately 54,100 people
reside in the City.
The predominant land use in Lynwood is residential (42.8�),
followed by industrial (6.5�) and commercial uses (5.9$)•
The majority of the City's residential uses consist of
mature single family housing stock. New single family
housing construction has been minimal. The residential
community has been severely impacted by the clearances
required for construction of the I-105 Freeway which cuts
through the heart of the City. The majority of industrial
uses are located in the western portion of the City with
commercial uses scattered throughout the City.
Over the past twenty years, Lynwood has experienced
substantial disinvestment which has had a dramatic impact.on
the community. The displacement of over 1000 housing units
from the City as a result of the land acquisition for the I-
'a
Y' •
];
f:
f.
y ..
#�
i'x
r;
G'
�"
f.:
�i �.
K
<5
li
' x.
•right-of-way, the delays �perienced in its
105 Freeway �s commercial and
construction and the aging o� the City
industrial plants and facilities have contributed to the
physical decay of the City and the resulting disinvestment.
" The past �ew yc�is Nortend that the declining economic
trends of the City have started to reverse as illustrated by
a substantial increase in residential and commercial
development including the new.Lynwood Towne Center project.
This reversal is a resul leaders� and rlocal�rcitizenst� have
off'icials, community
illustrated a resurqence in their commitment " ia " and
together to make Lynwood a better place to work, P Y
live. Second, the State of Ca and r a la light� m rail ent mas s
construct the I-105 Freeway,
transportation S laces Lynwood intanatenviableetPostion tto
early 1990's, P
attract quality development.
, III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The selected Consultant will be responsible for providing
all professional services necessary to update and revise the
existing General Plan, the �nvironment Impact Report, and
other plans and documents pertinent to the establishmeot
policies for future growth-and development. The p 7
includes services necessary - to effect full compliance
between the City's General Plan and applicable State law,
" including C.E.Q•A• and Housing Element Guidelines. In
addition to the mandatory elements, the General Plan should
include an Economic Develo}�ment/Redevelopment Element and a
Community Design Element.
Furthermore, it is expected that a substantial part of the
General Plan update will be devoted to: (1) analyzing the
impacts of the City's overcrowding problem, the excessive
amount of areas zoned for multi-residential development, the
deteriorated infrastructure and housing, the obsoletetcndand
deteriorated commercial and industrial properties,
(2).developing specific and iealistic objectives, policies,
programs, schedules, and standards for solving these
problems, develop favorable conditions for economic
development and business expansion, and to create
alternative and new revenue sources for the City.
� IV, WORK PROGRAM
The work pro4ram must include the following services:
A. Review existing data sources re General Plan and
° Lynwood includinq the existing
available economic data, andarelatedtreports.p�PCompile
� and development trends,
the necessary additional data to prepare the updated
Genereal Plan and related documents. The information
' �: �
;
;
a
}.
. };
,:
Y
i ":
r ._
F.
i:
s.
�• _.- -, _ _ _ _
'.. . .. _ _...,..-----.. . . ,
__----- --- _..__ i
� �
that is compiled should,be placed in a format that can
be computerized on the City's system and updated by the
City on an annual basis. This shall include conducting
` field surveys to ascertain existing land uses, existing
+�..•i.-?:�.• �nr�;.r;,�.,�; public infrastructure conditions
....i... . ,.� ,. _�..
and other required field surveys.
B. Based upon the Consultant's research, analysis and
� community input, prepare a draft updated General Plan
° proposing policies, programs, realistic objectives,
standards and schedules to (1) correct existing
deficiencies, and (2) guide the future development of
the City of Lynwood. The following General Plan
Elements will require updating:
Last Updated
l. Housing Element 1985
2. Land Use Element 1977
3. Circulation Element 1977
4. Open 5pace and Conservation Element 1977
5. Noise Element 1977
6. Safety Elemenf 1977
7. Scenic Highways 19
C. In addition to updating the seven existing elements, the
Consultant shall develop community Design and Economic
Development/Redevelopment Elements.
1. The primary goal of the Community Design Element is
to produce a working document with specific goals,
objectives and implementation measures that can be
utilized as a tool for controlling and improving the
aesthetics of all uses within the community. In
this respect, a major component of this element
should be detailed design guideliens or development
standards. These design guidelines or development
standards should address the following aspects of
development or rehabilitation:
a. Building Appearance
b. Heiqht, Build and Setbacks
� c. Signage
d. Landscape and Hardscape of exterior areas on
private property
e. Parking and Access
� f. Rehabilitation of existing properties
, g. Methodolgy for the administration of Design and
Development Standards.
�
�� :
�;
y
s
r:
}.
> ,, .
t
r,.
>i
�. �
2. The Economic 4 Development/Redevelopment Element
should provide a multi-faceted economic portrait of
the City along,with a future blueprint for increased
- economic viability. This portrait should provide a
p'tofi7.� oF *h'� �s,�=t;,ng economic conditions that
encompass the City coupled with an analysis that
provides implementation measures for future
development opportunities within the City.
To accomplish this, the following items must be
included:
a; Preparation of an economic profile of the City
including:
� (1) Demographic information containing
population trends including characteristics
and projections, income data, employment,
labor.pool data and unemployment estimates.
(2) An evaluation of the economic strengths and
weaknesses of Lynwood as compared with
surrounding communities.
(3) An analysis of market demand for various
types of commercial and industrial uses in
the area and evaluation of the potential to
capture or recapture commercial/industrial
business.
b. Market Analysis
This section should analyze past, present and
near term real estate market dynamics. This
analysis should assess the underlying forces
which have affected development activity and
patterns. Such an analysis should not be site
or building specific. Rather, it should
establish the general framework for assessing
the future development potential of Lynwood.
c. An analysis of the economic strengths and
weaknesses of Lynwood and determination of needs
and targets of opportunity. In this section,
findings and conclusions flowing from the
"Economic Profile" would be analyzed to identify
the needs, constraints and potential for future
development.
3. Formation of Revitalization Strategy
` After sufficient data . has been collected and
analyzed, it is important that specific
implementation measures be derived for the future
,.
�.;
i,;
;::
z>
>s
�_
�:
F't
S:
. L
. s;
� �i
�;
S'.
Fa
upgr�ing of the community. � this respect, an
indepth implementation. program should be created
' based on realistic deveTopment scenarios. The
process should include the following:
a. A descript:on o` ^�;°^r;.�es and related short
and long term strategies. Objectives should be
related to identified goals, be geographically
and/or sectorally specific, and have an assigned
priority. The related strategies should
� encompass the range of activities and programs
that will be undertaken to accomplish the stated
• objectives.
b. Identificat'ion and description of selected
primary areas or sites for developmentJ
conversion/rehabilitation and/or preservation.
This would include an evaluation of development
potential in the selected areas in prototypical
terms and in light of market outlook in general
this evaluation would identify:
(1) Scale of use
(z) Type of development (e.g. new,
construction, rehabilitation, etc.)
(3) ProbabT'e timing for development
(4) Financing sources for project developments
V. MEETINGS AND REPORTS
This project will include public participation and the
selected Consultant will be required to coordinate such
participation including the scheduling of _ meetings,
presentations at meetings and preparation of required
documents for meetings including public notices. The
Consultant shall be required to conduct an organizational
meeting and a series of policy development meetings with the
City Council, Planning Commission, Citizens' Advisory
Committee, other Citizens' organizations, and City staff.
Update meetings with City staff shall be conducted on an "as
needed" basis, but not less than once a month. Monthly
status reports should be prepared by the Consultant which
would identify progress made during the previous month and
outline planned activities for the next month.
The Consultant shall be required to provide 50 copies of the
final adopted General Plan and EIR as well as 3 copies of
1:400' multi-color land use maps and, 100 copies of
� plates�and mylar1ve11umsausedsforareproductions,all original
�
�<
:=;
_ ;;
#:
T:
,. S.i
�:
S7
s'
s
%;
T'.
C
. � . f .. �' � �.
i".
� �
VI. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
A. Element Phasina and Environmental Considerations
As previously indicated in this RFP, the City desires to
update all existing General Plan Ele,r„e.:,� � aa3 r�].a.ted
environmental documents, plus complete new Community
Design and Economic Development/ Redevelopment Elements.
The City does not envision the simultaneous completion
of all elements. The City's priority is for the
completion of the Community Design and Economic
�� Development Elements first. The City is aware that if
an EIR is not adopted concurrently with the Community
Design and Economic Development Elements, the elements
may operate only as advisory programs. However, the
Consultant will be required to evaluate and recommend
� alternative methods for the enforceable use of the
Elements prior to adoption of a General Plan and the
attendant EIR. It is envisioned that this would involve
the adoption of certain policies by the City Council
that contain the "meat" of the Community Design and
'Economic Development Elements.
B. Data Base Update
The Consultant. shall develop and provide the City with
the methodology/system for updating data baseline. The
Consultant shall identify all sources of data (Agency,
address, phone number, contact person, etc.), cycles of
data availability (type/title of reports/ publications,
periods of reporting, dates of publications and/or data
availability, etc.). This methodoldgy/system shall be
computer-based (P.C. compatible) and designed to be
integrated into an information management system at a
later date.
C. Compliances
The General Plan update and the preparation of the two
new elements will be financed with Community Development
Block Grant Funds; therefore, it is imperative that the
Consultant is thoroughly knowledgeable of Federal
requirements and policies in using Federal funds. It is
the City's wishes that the Consultant maximize the use
of minori.ty and women personnel in the preparation of
Plan. The City has budgeted $165,000 for the
preparation of this General Plan Update.
VII. SUBMITTAL REQUZREMENTS
All parties wishing to compete for this contract must submit
25 copies of the following information, which must be in
;� keeping with this format, identifying each item by number
and letter:
>
;,
,:
+;
S:
e r
li :
T .
Y{
Si
Y.' "
x.
..
... ' -.. .. ....... ....�_...... . � ...... .... . _.. ..... ._..... . . . . . .�� . . _... _.. _ .._ ..._.._
_ t
S.
K
A
C
]'
��.;
w ;�
� C:
, T:
�.
�'
A. A lett• of interest stating the f�m's or professional
team's capability to perform this project as outlined
within this RFP. Work program with tasks and task
descriptions.
B. A statement describing the prir_cipal� of *_he. firm and
their experience and qualifications. Identical
information should be provided identifying all
subcontractors to be used.
C. A statement describing the key personnel who would be
assigned to this project, along with their experience
and qualifications. It should be clear as to the
specific individuals assiqned to a particular
document/task and percentage of time commitment. A
project team organizational chart should be included.
D. A list of references that must include at least three
clients that the firm(s) has performed similar or
related work for (samples may be attached).
E. Listing of all contracts for the same or similar
services currently being provided or terminated during
the preceding five years.
F. Statement of minority participation in project and
description of the firm(s) Affirmative Action or Equal
Opportunity Program.
G. A schedule outlining the time requirements for
completion of each of the required tasks and the cost
breakdown related to each task, and cumulative, on an
"not to exceed" basis.
H. The firm's preliminary assessment and individuals
assigned to each task of the issues confronting the
City.
I. Planned approach to the project.
J. Work program• with tasks, task descriptions and
individual assigned to each task.
K. Utilization of graphics.
L. outline of public participation program.
M. Schedule of activities.
N. Number of ineetings and visits to project area, and cost
- of additional meetings if requested by City.
' 0. Knowledge of C.D.B.G. and other appropriate Federal
regulations and requirements.
;.
:;
;;
;,
3;
4'
p. Requireme� from the City and City st involvement in
the project.
Q, All proposals must be submitted to Directo1988Catm11330
Development, by 4:OOPM, July 25 .
Bullis Road, Lynwood, CA 90262. Late pronosals shall
not be accepted.
VIII, SELECTION PROCESS
A. Schedule
The selection schedule is anticipated to be as follows:
City Council issues Request for Proposals
5/24/88
Pre-proposal Meeting
6/20/88
Submittal deadline
7/25/88
7/25/88
Review of Proposals by City staff and g/10/88
Advisory Committee
Preliminary interviews and/or requests for g�10/88-
any clarification of materials by City g�31/88
staff and Advisory Committee
City Council action approving selection 9/6/88
of Consultant(s)
' 9/12/88
Contract commencement
B, Rating Criteria
The rating criteria outlined below shall be followed:
1. Capabilities of the firm and ___________ 15$
associated resources
2. Qualifications of key individ ___________ 10�
uals ----------- 10�
3. Experience in similar projects ___________ 10$
4. Understanding of issues
5. Appropriateness andand�workh
ness of inethodolgy ___________ 20�
program
6. Record of performance (references) -------'--- 1
7. Firm's Affirmative Action record ___________ 5 �
and plan _________-- 10�
8. Cost ----------- 5�
9. Miscellaneous
. 100�
r.;
f.:
F'
:.
_.
i:
F'
S'.
c
S1
C;
f'.
.r
�} 1
!:
l�
IX. GENERAL � •
1. The City reserves the right to reject any and all
proposals.
2. The aforementioned selection criteria are provided to
assist proposers and are not meant to limit other
considerations which may become apparent during ttie
course of the selection process.
3. The City reserves the right.to issue written notices to
all participating firms of any changes in the proposal
submission schedule should the Director of Community
' Development in his sole discretion determine that such
changes are necessary. .
4. Acceptance by the City of any proposal submitted
- pursuant to this RFP shall not constitute any implied
intent to enter into a contract for consultant services.
}
,=t
�;
' r.:
. . 4-
s'
y:
:
s':
�.
4i
1i
f'.
R:
3:
J
� �
DATE: May 17, 1988
T0: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL �
��`, '
FROM: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Interim Community `
Development Director �
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL CDBG FUNDS -BUSZNESS
SERVICES DEVEL�PMENT INSTITUTE (BSDI)
PURPOSE
The' purpose of this item is to request Council approval of an
additional $4,879.03 in CDBG funds for Business Services
Development Institute to cover the cost of training two additional
Lynwood residents in the Medical Transcription Training Program.
FACTS
1. In May, 1987, City Council received a proposal from BSDI
requesting $35,000 in CDBG funds to establish a training
program for Lynwood residents in the area of inedical billing,
t'ranscription and word processing. These funds would cover
the cost of training 10 Lynwood residents at a cost of $2,500
per student, plus administrative costs.
2. Due to other funding priorities, BSDI's request was reduced to
$17,500 tb cover the cost of training 5 individuals. On June
, 16, 1987, Council approved a contract with BSDI for $17,500 in
CDBG funds to establish the program.
3. The classes began in September with fifteen students, nine of
which were Lynwood residents. Five students eventually dropped
out of the class and ten students graduated February 5, 1988.
Seven of the graduates are Lynwood residents and three of them
have accepted full=time employment with Medical Management
Support Services, BSDI's parent company, and. four are
currently working part-time.
4. Since it was not cost ef£ective to begin a class for only five
students, BSDI had to secure private donations to cover the
cost of renting/leasing equipment, telephones and monthly
utilities. Furthermore, some students were only available
during the evening hours which required the hiring of an
additional instructor to accommodate an evening class.
5. The total cost incurred for services to Lynwood residents was
$22,379.03; therefore, BSDI is requesting the difference of
$4,879.03 ($22,379.03 -$17,500.00) to cover the cost of
training two additional Lynwood residents.
6. On March 15, 1988, staff presented BSDI's request to Council
. for approval. After some discussion, Council requested that
the matter be continued until the City Attorney had an
opportunity to review the propriety of BSDI's request.
7. On April 20, 1988, staff received a letter from City Attorney
Henry Barbosa (see attached Exhibit A) and found that there
would be no impediment to the City approving BSDI's.request.
� ABENDA 2TEM,
' C�V ,
� �
8. On April 26, 1988, staff forwarded a letter to HUD requesting
an opinion on the appropriateness oi amending BSDI's contract.
On May 6, 1988, the City received a letter of approval. (See
attached'Exhibit B).
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
It is the City Attorney's opinion that there is no impediment to
modifying BSDI's contract provided that the appropriate
--- documentation in support of the request is approved by the Federal
Government as allowable costs actually incurred.
Federal_ Ma,nagement Circular A-87, "Principles For Deter,mining '
Costs Applicable To Grants And Contracts With State, Local and
Federally Recognized Indian and Tribal Governments" (Part C-1)
states:
To be allowable under a grant program costs must meet the
following general criteria:
a. Be necessary and reasonable fos proper and efficient
administration of the grant programs, be allocable
thereto under these principles, and, except as specifically
provided herein, not be a general expense required to
carry out the overall responsibilities of State, local
or federally-recognized Indian tribal governments.
. , b. Be authorized or not prohitited under State or local
laws or regulations.
c. Conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in ,
these principles, Federal laws, or other governing
limitations as to types or amounts of cost items.
d. . Be consistent with policies, regulations and procedures
' that apply uniformly to boEh federally assisted and�
, other activities of the unit of government of which the
grantee is part.
e. Be accorded consistent treatment through application of
generally accepted accounting principles appropriate to �
the circumstances.
f. Not be allocable to or included as a cost of any other
federally financed program in either the current or a
prior period.
, g. Be net of all applicable credits.
. The costs incurred by BSDI meet all of the above criteria.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests that City Council adopt the attached
resolution which approves an amendment to BSDI's contract
allowing for an increase of $4,879.03 in CDBG funds.
• #
F�-IISIT A
' . BARBOSA F3 VERA
�� . ATTORNEYS AT LAW
� HENRY S.BARBOS/ LOS ANGELES CORPORhTE CENTER �
RONALD T. VERA� SUrtE 350 655 SOUTH HOPE STREET
' ' RICHARD J�. MORILLO 1000 CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE -
SU�TE 1300
DOUGLnS D.BnRNES
. , GONZnlO P. CUR�EL MONTEREY PARK, CALIFORNIA �JI754 �OS ANGELES, Cn 9DOn
�LYNNE 5. BA5515 . (213) 263-5199 " (2i3) 6BB-�92�
. ANA .L FIGUEROA
- OF COUNSEL ,
M]CHAGL 5. BERNICK ' -�i� �4� `��.,
F�', F �s,.� 6:. � �`' � �..r'
April 19, 1988
��� z �+ 198E
Ci —� y �,:-: ;_v�,,.,,r
,�L < ;;= ,,,
?, ._ _ �.=:?; -
' Mr. ArLhur N. Waller �
Housing and Community
Development Coordinator
City of Lynwood
11330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, California 90262
Re: Amendment to BSDI Agreement
Our File No.: 5-000-02
Dear Mr. Waller:
The City Council has inquired whether there is any
impediment to allowing an increase of the contract amount to
BSDI by $4,879.03, and whether or not this would constitute a
gift of public funds.
It is our understanding, that the BSDI modified the
program set 'forth in Exhibit A in order to accommodate the
particular needs of the students who were ultimately enrolled
in the program. The contract entered'into between the City and
= BSDI set forth the terms of performance of the contract.
Paragraph 3 of the agreement clearly specifies that any
reimbursement shall be paid out of funds received by tne City
from the Federal Government for "allowable costs actually
occurred for the express purpose specified" and that any
reimbursement shall not be a charge upon the City.
Additionally, paragraph 20 allows modification of the agreement
subject to a subsequent written instrument executed by both
parties. It would appear therefore, that to the extend that
.- Community Development B1ock Grant funds are available and
taking into account that the City's approval would be limited
to such £unds availability, there is no impediment to making
� the modification provided the appropriate documentation in
support of the request is approved by the Federal Government as
"allowable costs actually incurred" as that as set forth in the
agreement.
In conclusion, since the agreement contemplates the
situation before the City and sets £orth the parameters of
reimbursement then it would appear that if the criteria are
satisfied there would be no impediment to the City approving
this request.
If there is any question regarding any of the foregoing,
please £eel free to call upon me.
. Very truly.� ours,
_ /;
'�
, �/
i C�/"� -
. He S. Barbosa
Attorney
HSB:ng 461 y
cc: City Manager
� � � �.
;
�s
;
l��IAY �E 'Sc; 11�°�b USPF+'UD� 1E�5 W nL'rhiPiG LR FIELD OFFICE 171 F'[t�
^!'��. U.S. Department ot Housing and Urban Dovelopment
� : Lus AnOidOL Aiea OII1re.Re4i0n ly:
'��IIIIIIII IE1$ Wp.;1 pP�mp'�c Roulevui0
4 L�is An4b`Ir•.;. Celiloini.i !�CO�.`. �0
•ya �
t?ay 6, issa ' �
Mr. Arthur Waller
HCDA Coordinator
City af Lynwood
11330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, CA 90262
Dear Mr. Waller:
SUBJECT: Subrec'ipient Contract Amendment I
Grant Number: B-'�7-t1C-06-0559 �
This �5 in response to your letter of April 26, 1988, reg3rding i
the appropriateness of amending a contract o-�ith Business Sarvices I
Development Instiiute. Your requ2st to am=nd the contract for an
zddition�l 54,679.03 has been approved. i
However, it should be noted that proper administration and �
monitoring of this subrecipient by your staff should preclude �
incurring costs �vhich may exceed approved contracts in the future, �
Should the City decide to r2new or contract for 5imilar services I
in the future with other providers we would advrse that the City �
provide a specific serviCe such as salary for the instructor, books, ;
etc. This would provide the City �,aith better leverage in cnntrolling
costs by your subrecipients.
Should you hav� any questions regarding this letter, please
cail Mr. Harold Butler, Community Planning and Development �
Repres?ntative, at (213) 251-7245.
� Sincerely, �
i
/ �
� ���.i'.l'd ���-� � I
G�eichert i
Program Manager, 9,4CM3
I
� I
I
'
�
I
�
I
!;:: I
- I
� �
pFso*vT?oN No.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LYNWOOD APPROVING AN INCREASE OF FOUR THOUSAND
". EIGHT HUNDREII SBVENTY-NZNE DOLLARS AND THREE CENTS
, IN 1987-88 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK.GRANT (CDBG)
FUNDS TO CONTRACT NO. 87F-008 WITH BUSINESS
SERVICES DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE
WHEREAS, on June 16, 1987, the Lynwood City Council
approved a contract in the amount of $17,500 in CDBG funds with
Business Services Development Institute (BSDI) to establish a
training program for five (5) Lynwood residents in the field of.
medical billing and transcribing; and
WHEREAS, in order to make the program more cost effective,
BSDI established the piogram with fifteen (15) students, utilizing
private donations to supplement Lynwood's contribution; and
WHEREAS, seven (7) Lynwood residents completed the training
on February 5, 1988 and are currently employed as a result of the
, training; and
WHEREAS, the cost of services to Lynwood residents exceeded
the Contract amount by $4,897.03.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lynwood
does hereby find, order, determine and resolve as.follows:
SECTION 1. Paragraph 3. "Compensation and Method of
: Payment" for Contract No. 87F-008, with Business Services
Development Institute, is hereby amended to increase the amount of
— compensation from $17,500 to $22,379.03, which reflects an
increase of $4,879.03 in CDBG funds.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of ,
1988.
PAUL H. RICHARDS, Mayor
City of Lynwood
ATTEST:
ANDRE'A L. HOOPER, City Clerk
City of Lynwood
' APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
KENRICK R. KAREFA-JOHNSON
- Interim Director, Community
_ Development Dept.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
, CITY ATTORNEY
ACCOUNTING MANAGER
� �
DATE:. May 17, 1988
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL �
FROM: Kenrick Karefa-Johnson, Interim Director of /i� /
Community Development (� j
SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION
OPERATING AGREEMENT WITH SECURITY PACIFIC
NATIONAL BANK {SPNB)
FACTS
1. On May 19, 1967, the City entered an agreement with
Security Pacific National Bank to operate a Commercial
Property Rehabilitation Loan Program.
2. The above agreement is due to expire on May 19, 1988,
' and the City currently has several commercial
rehabilitation loans in process to effect facade
improvements on Long Beach Boulevard.
' 3. To continue current operations, it is necessary to
extend the expiration date of the agreement by one year.
ANALYSIS CONCLUSION
The City has recently targeted financial assistance to
� property owners in the Long Beach Boulevard Facade
Improvement program area. One of the financing alternatives
provides a below-market interest rate loan which is ,
facilitated through an interest subsidy program with SPNB.
To continue offering this financing mechanism, it is
� necessary to extend the term of the current agreement one
year to May 19, 1989.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff respectfully requests that Council adopt the attached
resolution to the date one year to May 19, 1989.
AGF.HDA ITEM
�'
� �
RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OE LYNWOOD TO EXTEND THE INTEREST SUBSIDY
AGREEMENT WZTH SECURITY PACZFIC NATIONAL BANR
, (SPNB) FOR ONE YEAR
— WHEREAS, the City desires to eontinue operation of a
Commercial Property Rehabilitation Loan Program which offers
below-market interest rate loans to upgrade commercial
property within the City; and •
WHEREAS, the current operating agreement with Security
Pacific National Bank which facilitates this program is due
to�expire May 19, 1988.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Lynwood
does hereby find, order, determine and resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. The Commercial Rehabilitation Operating
agreement, with Security Pacific National Bank is hereby
'extended for a period of one year to May 19, 1989. '
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of
, 1988.
PAUL H. RICHARDS� II.� MAYOR
City of Lynwood
— ATTEST:
' ANDREA L. HOOPER� CITY CLERK
City of Lynwood
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
, KENRICK KAREFA-JOHNSON
Interim Director of
Community Development
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
ACCOUNTING SUPERVISOR
1
� �
DATE: May 17, 1988
, T0: Honorabie Mayor and Members oi the City Council
FROM: Donald J. Fraser, Assistant City Manager�
by Douglas E. Robinson, Personnel Officer�
SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DIVISION STAFFING
PURPOSE
To recommend that the Ci[y Council add one position of Public Works Inspector
to the Public Works Department, Engineering Division and delete one position
for Civil Engineering Technician.
BACRGROUND
The Engineering Division currently has a Public Works Inspector position per-
forming technical field support for Public Works construction, and a Civil
Engineering Technician who perfoxms calculations and drafting.
ANALYSIS
Due to the shift in the Engineering Division workload towards construction
administration and away from design, the division would be better served by
. adding a Public Works Inspector position and deleting the Civil Engineering
Technician position. The incumbent Civil Engineering Technician would be
appointed to the Public Works Inspector position since he is on the existing
eligibility list. The salary cost to the Engineering Division will increase
by $2,200 per year.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council amend the authorized position list to
add one Public Works Inspector position to the Engineering Division and delete
one Civil Engineering Technician position.
. AGENDA ITEM
��
�
r � � � ,�: �
CITY OF LYNWOOD
FIRE DEPARTMENT
INTER - OFFICE MEMO
DATE: May 17, 1988
TO: The_.Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Gerald L. Wallace - Fire Chief
G.L.W.
SUBJECT: Computer Aided Dispatch System
_ OBJECTIVE
To impove emergency rQSponse times and service to the
citizens of Lynwood.
FACTS
The. City of Lynwood is curently in a Joint Communication
Center with Downey�, Compton, Montebello, and Santa Fe
Springs.
The City o£ Lynwood pays approx. 9� of the Costs for the
Joint Communications Center.
The Cost�for Lynwood to have its own dispatch center would be
prohibitive. '
The current dispatch system is old and outdated and is not
able to handle the current emergency responses in a manner
consistent wifh the high standards of the fire service.
The cost of a computer aided dispatch is $838,014.
� There are five oities sharing the cost of the system.
City of Downey 246,106.00
City of Santa Fe Springs 196,659.00
City.of Compton 164,982.00
City of Montebello 153,061.00
City of Lynwood 77,075.00 ,
Lease Purchase is $'32,89�1.00 down with four annual payments
of $ 14,189.
.The HCDA Advisory Board has approved the purchase of computer
system utilizing CDBG funds.
The system must be ordered by June 1, 1988 to maintain the
price quDte.
All cities witii the exception of E�ynwood has approved the
purchase of the System. - -
RECOI�II�IENDATI ON :
It is reco�nended that the City Council authorize the
. purchase of the Computer Aided Dispatch System.
AGEh�'� i i'�i�
�23 '
�
- ,
�
� � � �
DATE: MAY 17, 1988
T0: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CHARLES GOMEZ, CITY MANAGER
' SUBJECT: RTD SECURITY SERVICES
BALKGROUND
Every year the City assists RTD with Prop A money for security on the 6uses.
ANALYSIS
Los Angeles County Transportation Commission has this activity as an allowable
expendi,ture for Prop A moneys.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the attached contract and authorizes for the Mayor to
execute it.
�
�
I
�
AGEkDA ITEI4 �
�
a_ - �
. �
;} � ;
� ;
. ,
. �
;
;
;
,
� � ,;
,
; ;
, , �;
;
; ,
; .
� ;;
; � ��
,
;,
;
� ,
� i ; '
I i �
� i � �
i
� I
i !
`+ = COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES .
'- � ki `^'
- � i ('* ' R f .
;� �"; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
�� � � r 90050UTHFREMa�TA
, • �t�v��a+`�� ALHAMBRa. CALIFOR�IA 91803-13J1 -
TdaphoK: (618� �SB-5100 ADDRESS A�L CORRESPO'�DE�CF. TO:
` P.0.80X 1�60
THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON. Diro��or
ALHAMBRA, ULIFORSIA 9180b106
� J e tNREPLVPLEASE pD-2
APryl ],p 1988 PEFENTOFILE: 81 '
Mr. Charles G. Gomez
City Manager
City of Lynwood
11330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, CA 90262
Dear Mr. Gomez:
RTD SECURITY SERVICES
PROPOSED LYNWOOD-COUNTY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
Enclosed are three originals and one copy of a proposed agreement
regarding the extension of the City-County coopera=ovided�brathe�
finance transit security services which is being p Y
Southern California Rapid Transit District (SCRTD) under a separate
contract with the County. The agreement is based upon recent
discussions with City staff indicating that your City proposes to
continue its participation in this program. The agreement provides
for your City to contribute a fixed sum of $13,833 in City
Proposition A Local Return funds to cover the period from
November 1, 1987 to October 31, 1966.
If the agreement is-satisfactory, please pre=ovalitpleaseureturn
authorized officials,for approval. Upon app
the three originals to the Los Angeles County Department of Public
� Works for further action., After final approval by the Board of
Supervisors, we will return the fully executed City original to
- your City.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
y truly y urs,
�
��/I' . TIDEMANSON
' 1"lDir ctor of Public Works
ESC:la/clrtd'
Enc.
cc: Supervisor Kenneth Hahn
LACTC
, . ,
� � �
A G R E E M E N T
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the CITY
OF LYNWOOD, a municipal corporation in the County of Los Angeles,
hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a
political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred
to as "COUNTY":
RECITALS:
A. Previous studies revealed that during the 12-month period
from July 1, 1982 to June 30, 1983, over 60� of transit related
crimes reported to the Southern California Rapid Transit District
(SCRTD) Transit Police occurred within COUNTY'S South Central area.
B. A program to suppress transit crime within the Second
Supervisorial District, implemented on December 17, 1984 through
June 30, 1985 and subsequently continued from November 4, 1985
through October 31, 1987, has resulted in a decrease in the crime
rate.
C. COUNTY and the SCRTD recently entered into a new agreement
to continue this advantageous program through October 31, 1988 to
provide six Transit Police Officers to suppress crime and one crime
prevention investigator to conduct.training sessions for bus riders
to assist them in avoiding crime, hereinafter referred to as "CRIME
I REDUCTION FORCE".
1 D. COUNTY and CITY, in cooperation with other Cities in the
� Second Supervisorial District, are willing to finance CRIME REDUCTION
I
� FORCE with Proposition A Local Return funds for the period from
i
I November 1, 1987 through October 31, 1968.
I
�
�,
I
I
I
� �
-a-
E. COUNTY proposes to enter into Agreements with these other
Cities to cover their contributions to this program.
F. COUNTY has obtained the approval of the Los Angeles County
Transportation Commission to qualify CRIME REDUCTION FORCE for
Proposition A expenditures.
G. COUNTY is willing to pay for the cost of CRZME REDUCTZON
FORCE in excess of the Cities' contributions, which total cost is
estimated at $360,000.
NOw, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be
derived by both CZTY and COUNTY and of the premises herein contained,
it is hereby agreed as follows:
(1) CITY AGREES:
a. To pay a fixed sum of $13,833 in Proposition A Local
Return funds to COUNTY to cover its share of the cost
of CRIME REDUCTION FORCE for the period from
November 1, 1987 to October 31, 1988, after full execu-
tion of this Agreement and upon demand by COUNTY.
(2) COUNTY AGREES:
I a. To finance cost of CRIME REDUCTION FORCE in excess of
Cities' contributions.
I b. To accept CITY'S fixed contribution of 513,833.
I
I
�
1
�
�
I
I •
I
� �
' -3-
(3) IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
a. Neither COUNTY nor any officer or employee of COUNTY
shall be responsible for any damage or liability
occurring by reason of any acts or omissions on the
part of CITY under or in connection with any work,
authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this
Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that,
pursuant to Government Code, Section 895.4, CITY shall
fully indemnify, defend and hold COUNTY harmless from
any liability imposed for injury (as defined by
Government Code, Section 810.8) occurring by reason of
any acts or omissions on the part of CITY under or in
connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction
delegated to CITY under this Agreement.
b. Neither CITY nor any officer or employee of CITY
shall be responsible for any damage or liability
occurring by reason of any.acts or omissions on the
part of COUNTY under or in connection with any
I work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to COUNTY
G under this Agreement. It is also understood and
I agreed that, pursuant to Government Code, Section
I 895.4, COUNTY shall fully indemnify, defend and
� hold CITY harmless from any liability imposed for
�� injury (as defined by Government Code, Section
I 810.8) occurring by reason of any acts or omissions
I
I .
�
I
I
�
I
�
,
I
� •
-4-
on the part of COUNTY under or in connection with
any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to
COUNTY under this Agreement.
.
.
I
�-
I
(
i
�
�'
�`
� .
1
I
I
� �
-s-
(4) It is understood and agreed that the provisions of the
� Assumption of Liability Agreement heretofore entered
� into between the parties hereto are inapplicable to this
Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be executed by their respective officers, duly
' authorized, by the CITY OF LYNWOOD on , 1988
, and by the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES on , 1988.
ATTEST:
LARRY J. MONTEILH
. Executive-Officer-Clerk of
the Board of Supervisors COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
' . BY BY '
DEPUTY CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ATTEST: , CITY OF LYNWOOD
' By . , BY
CITY CLERK MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM
DE WITT W. CLINTON
County Counsel
BY i�i� �// .Gf� °.� �
DE UTY
� �
Date: May 17, 1988
; To: The Honorable Mayor and Council
From: Donald J. Fraser, Assistant City Manager�
Subject: SELECTION OF LABOR RELATIONS FIRM
Objective
To have the City Council select a firm to represent the City in
upcoming labor negotiations.
Facts .
1) Staff has obtained proposals from two law firms to handle the
meet and confer process with the employee bargaining units.
The firms are Liebert, Cassidy and Frierson and Filarsky &
Watt. '
2J Both firms have extensive experience in labor relations and
personnel matters with California Cities. Attached are
proposals from each firm, which show their background.
3) Fees for Liebert, Cassidy & Frierson can be paid in one of
two ways. The City can choose a retainer option or pay
hourly rates between $95.00 - 150.00 an hour.
4) Filarsky,& Watt's fees are structural at $110.
Analysis
Since both firms are experienced and capable, it is difficult to
choose betwen them. However, Mr. Filarsky has committed to doing
the negotiations himself for the City. The representative from
Liebert, Cassidy and Frierson will not be one of the principals
in the firm.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council select the firm of
Filarsky & Watt to handle labor negotiations for the City. ,
AGElIDd ITEK
' ��
� � .
. L4W O�i�CES
' " LIEBERT, CASSIDY S FRIERSON
� • OROiE5510NI.L COGnOP�TiON
� �o�w uu[wr . 6033 WEST CENTUFlV BOULEVP4D ��� ��'��C�6C0 OenCC'.
. o�r¢� C C�a�ior . SUrtE 900 IOi P�e2>
reiuso«
. uwo��e.�ow LOS ONGELES, C4LIFORNIA 900/5 ��DO w�wne* STAteL 5��*[ �oio
S�M FR�NCISCO. C�LIfORrvi> D�102-530�
•wVCL �.���fOOn �
(2131 B�5-6<92 I�i61 !6r]i2v
° iIOM� D. WIN0�01� . � � �
.• � r�Ul M. Di7110iI JC��1�[v SIOAN
- �e.�.cowcu ��s¢ c�euis �
J ��Uf
MICr��CL L. OWLNS
ouw. �. �w.v � .
e:«`a:o:.:"::o:.00..., May 9, 1988
Mr. Don Frazier
Assistant Ci,ty Manager
. City of Lynwood
11330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, CA 90262
Re: Agreement for Special Services
Dear Mr. Frazier:
Per your conversation with John Liebert, enclosed you
will find an hourly and a monthly retainer Agreement for Special
Services with our firm.
When you have made a decision as to which contract best
fills your needs, please execute and return a signed copy to this
office for our records.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate
to call.
Very truly yours,
' LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIERSON
r ��""_ ���
By
Sue williams
for John Liebert
JL/sw
Encls:
� �
� � � i�
AGREEMENT FOR SPECIAL SERVICES 1
�
This Agreement is made this _ day of , 1988,
`. between the law firm of LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIERSON, A Professional �
Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Attorney," and the CITY OF
LYNwOOD, a Municipal Corporetion, hereinafter referred to as "City."
Attorney agrees to provide City consulting and
services pertaining to employment relations matters, including
" representation in negotiations and in administrative and court
proceedings, as requested by the City. The place and time for
such services are to be designated by the City.
City hereby designates Attorney as its special counsel
for employer-employee relations and agrees to pay Attorney at the
. rate of between Ninety-Five and One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($95.00 -
$150.00) per hour for services provided by attorney staff. Sixty-
Five Dollars ($65.00) for services provided by paralegal staff. and
� any necessary costs and expenses authorized by the City.
It is expressly understood and agreed that Attorney, while
engaged in carrying out and complying with any of the terms of this
Agreement, is an independent contractor and is not an employee of
City.
The term of this Agreement will be from May 15, 1988,
through May 14, 1989.
LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIERSON . CITY OF LYNWOOD
A Professional Cprporation A Municipal Corporation
(�\ ' , .
By I By .
j
U
, � �
AGREEMENT FOR SPECIAL SERVICES
This Agreement is made this _ day of , 1988,
between the law firm of LIEBERT, CASSIDY 6 FRIERSON, A Professional
Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Attorney," and the CITY OF
LYNWOOD, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City."
, Attorney agrees to provide City consulting and legal
services pertaining to employment relations matters, including
representation in negotiations and in administrative and court
proceedings, as requested by the City. The place and time for
such services are to be designated by the City.
City hereby designates Attorney as its special counsel
for employer-employee relations and agrees to pay Attorney at the •
. rate of between Ninety-Five and One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($95.00 -
,` $150.00) per hour fcir services provided by attorney staff, Sixty-
Five Dollars ($65.00) for services ptovided by paralegal staff, and
any necessary costs and expenses authorized by the City.
It is expressly understood and agreed that Attorney, while
engaged in carrying out and complying with any of the terms of this
Agreement, is an independent contractor and is not an employee of
City.
The term of this Agreement will be from May 15, 1988,
through May 14, 1989.
LIEBERT� CASSIDY & FRIERSON CZTY OF LYNWOOD
A Professional rporation A Municipal Corporation
' �
ey � -- gY
° . II
U
� �
, ANNUAL RETAINER AGREEMENT FOR SPECIAL SERVZCES
This Agreement is entered into this day.of
, 1988, between the CITY OF LYNWOOD, A Municipal
Corporation (hereinafter "City") and the law firm of LIEBERT, I
CASSIDY & FRIERSON, A Professional Corporation (hereinafter
"Attorney").
WHEREAS City desires to retain expert representation and
�onsulting services to assist City in its relations and negotiations
with its employee organiiations; and
WHEREAS A�torney is specially experienced and qualified to
perform the services desired by the City and is willing to perform
Such services:
NOW, THEREFORE, City and Attorney agree as follows:
1, At the direction of the City Manager, or his/her
designee(s), Attorney shall perform for the City all necessary and
reasonable services relating to employer-employee organization
relations and employment relations, including the providing of
expert advice to the City Council and City Manager or their
designee(s), representing City in negotiations with its recognized
employee organizations, including impasse resolution procednres, the
drafting of Memorandums of Understanding, planning, reporting and
study sessions with City Management, and assistance in administering
Memorandums of Understanding and personnel ordinances and rules,
2. For Attorney's aforesaid services performed under
this Agreement, City shall pay Attorney a monthly fee of $1,500.00
for one bargaining unit per month, and $500.00 per month for each
additional unit, payable on the first day of each month during
� �
� the term hereof commencing on the effective date of this
Agreement.
3• Representation in connection with administrative
hearings and court proceedings are not covered under the basic
Services hereunder. Attorney shall, upon request of the City,
provide such representation at the rate of between Ninety-Five and
, One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($95.00-$150.00) per hour for the actual
costs and expenses authorized by the City.
4. The term of this Agreement is twelve months,
commencing.May 15, 1988, to May 14, 1989. The term may be
extended for additional periods of time by the written consent
of the parties.
� 5. It•is understood and agreed by the parties that
Attorney is and shall remain an independent contractor under this
Agreement.
The parties have caused this Agreement to be executed and
' to be effective the day and year first above written.
LIEBERT� CASS�Y & FRIERSON CITY OF LYNWOOD
A Professiona Corporation A Municipal Corporation
/
�� � �
� � �/ �
iJ
_2_
� � �
ANiIUAL R£TAZNER"AGREEMENT FOR SPECIAL S£RVICES
This Agreement is Qntered into this day of
. 1988, between the CITY OF LYNWOOD, A i7unicipal
Corporation (hereinafter `�ity") and �he law firm of LIEBERT,
CASSIDY 6 FRIERSON, A Prof�ssional Corporation (hereinafter
"Attorney"�.
WHER£AS City desires to retain expert representation and=
consulting services to assist City in its relations and negotiations
with its employee organizations; and
WHEREAS Attorney..is special3y experienced and qualified to
perform the services desired by the City and is willing to perform
s�ch services:
NOW, THEREFORE, City and Attorney agree as follows:
' 1. -At the direction of the City Manager, or his/her
designee(s),_ Attorney shall perform for the City all necessary and •
reasonable services relabing to empioyer-employee organization
relations and-employment relations, including the providing of
expert advice to the City Counci3 and City Manager or their
designee(s), representing City in negotiations with its recognized
employee organizations,.includirig impasse resolution procedures, the
drafting of Memorandums of Understanding, planning, reporting and
study sessions with.City Management, and assistance in administering
Memorandums of Understanding and personnel ordinances and rules.
' 2. For Attorney's aforesaid services performed under
this Agreement, City shall pay Attorney a monthly fee of $1,500.00
' for one bargaining unit per month, and $500.00 per month for each
additional unit, payable-on the first day of each month during
� �
the term hereof commencing on the effective date of this
Agreement.
3• Representation in connection with administrative
hearings and co�rt proceedings are not covered under the basic
services hereunder. Attorney shall, upon request of the City,
provide such representation at the rate of between Ninety-Five and
One Hundred Fifty Dollars (S95.00-$150.00) per hour for the actual
costs and expenses authorized by the City.
4. The term of this Agreement is twelve months,
commencing May 15, 1988, to May 14. 1989. The term may be
extended for additional periods of time by the written consent
of the parties. .
5. It is understood and agreed by the parties that
Attorney is and shall remain an independent contractor under this
Agreement.
The parties have caUSed this Agreement to be executed and
to be effective the day and year first above written.
LIEBERT, CASS�Y 6 FRIERSON CITY OF LYNWOOD
A Professiona Corporation A Municipal Corporation
\ ,i �
�
- u
_2—
� �
� FILARSBY Et WATT �
� ATTORNEYS AT LAW
� 3609 ELM PVENUE l0$ OMGELES OFFICE ,
STEVE A.FILMRSKV 'j566 OVEFL!.NO PVENUE
SMARON A. WP.TT " j.�7$�"PAN HHACH� CALIFOHNIA BOP..69 pin p�ppq I
� (2i31 5�5-�825 , LOS .�NGf�fS, Cn 8006a -
12131 202-06 � �
May 10, 1988
Mr. Donald Fraser
Assistant City Manager
City of Lynwood
11330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, CA 90262
Dear. Don:
' As a follow-up to our discussion of May 9, 1988. I am submitting
the following proposal for your review:
PRACTICE OF THE FIRM:
' Filarsky & Watt specializes in representing public sector
employers statewide in all matters pertaining to employer-
employee relations.
NEGOTIATIONS EXPERTISE:
Mr. Filarsky has served as a chief management-spokesperson in
collective bargaining negotiations with law enforcement, fire
protection, transit, teacher, and miscellaneous public employee
bar,gaining units. He has represented the following clients in
negotiations:
City of Baldwin Park
City of Buena Park
City of Colton
City of Fullerton
' City of Hemet
� City of Hermosa Beach .
City of Montebello
City of Monterey Park
City of Rialto
City of Stanton
- City of Signal Hill
South Bay Public Regional Communications Authority
City of Vernon
William S. Hart Union High School District
. � -1-
17/Fraser
� �
The agreements negotiated on behalf of these and other employers,
depending on the particular philosophy and circumstances of a
given agency, have run the gamut from brief understandings
limited to benefit items to comprehensive labor-type agreements
that define substantially all terms of employment, and through
management rights and "zipper" types of clauses, provided
protection to management's ability to manage the agency.
In addition to conducting negotiations and impasse resolutions
for public employers, Mr. Filarsky continually works with cities
and counties and other public agencies that employ staff
personnel to do their own negotiations. This arrangement has
involved all aspects of consultation and related services,
including writing initial bargaining proposals, providing
training and advice concerning negotiati strategies, and giving
general advice when particular problems arise.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS:
Mr. Filarsky has represented public employers in administrative
hearings before City Councils, Civil Service Commissions,
Personnel Commissions, Arbitrators, Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission, Fair Employment Practices and Housing Commission,
Public Employment Relations Board, and the Unemployment Insurance
Appeals Board. He has represented public employers in Superior
Court and Court of Appeal proceedings. Examples of such
representations, in addition to many of the agencies listed
earlier, include:
City of Azusa
City of Bell
City of Bell Gardens
City of Brea
City of Burbank
City of Downey
City of Manhattan Beach
City of Ontario
City of Pismo Beach �
City of San Jacinto
• City of Torrance
Twin Cities Police Department
STRIKES
Mr. Filarsky has developed and implemented strike planning
strategies and assisted in strike-related activities for both
private and public sector strikes.
-2-
17/Fraser
• i
CODE/ORDINANCE DRAFTING:
Mr. Filarsky has prepared personnel ordinances, rules and
regulations, and employer-employee resolutions for several
municipal clients including:
City of Claremont
City of Cudahy
City of Fullerton
City of Garden Grove
City of Glendora
City of Hemet
City of Lynwood
City of San Clemente
City of Santa Paula
City of Signal Hill
City of Stanton
TRAINING
Mr. Filarsky has conducted workshops for employee discipline,
performance evaluation, grievance handling, and negotiations for
the League of California Cities, California Public Employer Labor
Relations Association and many individual clients, including:
City of Azusa
City of Baldwin Park
City of Burbank
City of Carlsbad
City of Claremont
City of Colton
City of Downey
City of Fullerton
' City of Hanford
City of Hemet
City of Hermosa Beach
City of Laguna Beach
City of Manhattan Beach
City and County of San Francisco
� City of San Juan Capistrano
_ City of Signal Hill
City of Stanton
City of Torrance
William S. Hart Union High School District
OPERATIONAL PHILOSOPHY
* Mr. Filarsky works with and for the agency and
the designated staff and legislative body. His job is to provide
professional information and advice to assist the agency in
determining its policy goals and objectives, which then become
' his goals and objectives.
-3-
17/Fraser
� �
* Mr. Filarsky believes in carefully organizing
for the meet and confer process, with goals and objectives kept
well in mind. The negotiating process, as he believes, consists
of definable stages, from preparatory activities to the
preliminary bargaining phases, the hard bargaining phases, and
finally to agreement, impasse procedure or work action. Each
stage of the process requires an organized approach in order to
maximize the chances of attaining bargaining objectives.
* Mr. Filarsky's philosophy is not one of "Union
Busting," but rather one of using a professional approach that
seeks to achieve and maintain professional relationships,
notwithstanding the adversarial nature of the process.
* Mr. Filarsky calls to the attention of his
clients that in return for agreeing to competitive benefit
adjustments, it is reasonable for them to seek to contractually
protect and maximize their management discretion to set
standards of service and retain the prerogative to direct,
assign and stimulate employees to meet them.
* Mr. Filarsky sees the conclusion of
neqotiations as the beqinninq for establishing a constructive
employer-employee organization-employee relations structure
which requires management training and ongoing involvement with
agency management on his part.
MR. FILARSKY'S BACKGROUND:
Steve Filarsky is a magna cum laude graduate of Loyola
University, Los Angeles, with a Bachelor of Arts in Political
Science/Public Administration. He received his Juris Doctor,
with honors, from Loyola University School of I:aw, Los Angeles.
Prior to becoming an attorney, Mr. Filarsky served as a manager
in municipal labor relations and personnel administration with
the Cities of Garden Grove and Manhattan Beach. Mr. Filarsky
worked as an attorney with the law firm of Paterson & Taggart
and was one of five attorneys who split off to form Liebert,
Cassidy and Frierson. In January, 1982, Mr. Filarsky started
his own practice specializing in public sector employer-employee
relations. In March, 1986, Mr. Filarsky and Sharon Watt formed
the partnership of Filarsky & Watt.
MS. WATT'S BACKGROUND:
Sharon watt received Bachelors of Science and Masters of Science
degrees from the University of Southern California and a Juris
Doctor degree from Loyola University School of Law in Los
Angeles.
-4-
17/Fraser
i �
Ms. Watt has had extensive experience in the area of Personnel
and Education Law. She has been an Assistant Principal,
. Principal and Assistant Superintendent for Pezsonnel for school
districts in Southern California. She worked as an attorney
with ttie law firm of Paterson & Taggart and, with Mr. Filarsky,
was one of the founding attorneys of Liebert, Cassidy &
' Frierson. Before forming Filarsky & Watt, she was associated
with the firm of Pettit and Martin. In that capacity she
trained over 1900 administrators in file building and evaluation
for successful discipline.
'. Fees for Service
All services are billed at the rate of $110.00 per hour. There
° are no "extra" or "expense" charges that are billed in addition
to the hourly rate.
Availability
As we discussed, I would personally do the negotiations.
For local references, I work for the cities of Bell, Bell
Gardens, Commerce, Cudahy, Monterey Park, and Vernon.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to
call.
Sincerely,
���.�i�
Steve A. Filarsky
_
17/Fraser
.
,,
C I T V of L V N W 0 O D '
WARRANT �ATE: O5. 17.88 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE: 1 ��.
, PREPAIDS AND VOIDS
r•
WARRANTN AMOVNT VENDORk VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION INV DATE INVOICE AMOUNT �.
/' 11304 -157.23 25 OLUE DIAMOND MATERIA�S OS-17-88 -157.23
12018 -11.06 99999 PEDRO �OPEZ OS-17-88 -11.06 �
�� 127qq -85.00 99999 REVIVAL TIME CHURCH OS-17-88 -85.00
13847 -11.30 99999 ARIDS. AURORA OS-17-88 -11.30
14590 -8.28 99999 C. H. HROPP OS-17-88 -8.28
' 146�4 -1244.81 506 HUDSt]N-lINDSEV GROUP HOME OS-17-88 -1244.81
14b59 -50.00 736 MICRD SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS 05-17-88 -50.00
15091 -29.00 223 ROOERT REID - 09-17-88 -25.00
' 15658 -25.87 99999 CAL GAS CORPORATION 05-17-88 -d5.87
15723 -78.50 9999`1 MARTIN GUINTANA OS-17-B8 -�8.50
15802 -25.00 737 JOE BATTLE OS-17-88 -25.00
' 15807 -219.00 483 CD PU�LICATIONS 05-17-88 -219.00 -
16365 -19.60 99999 ARGO DISTRIBUTINC OS-17-88 -19.60
36389 -40.07 '79999 DECK & SANDY CHEUNG OS-17-88 -40.07
' 16390 -50.00 823 LENA DENNI3 OS-17-88 -30.00
16462 -120.13 202 PAGEANTRV PRODUCTIONS 05-17-88 -120.13
17231 -9.00 99999 SALIDAD SANCHEZ OS-17-BB -9.00
T8099 -lO5.A0 99999 GOSPEL MISSION OUTREACH OS-17-88 -109.00
18621 -36.44 99999 URDINA MANUEL , OS-17-88 -36.44
18471 -3400.00 172 LVNW00�� CITV OF - HOME OANN WORNER`5 COMP REIM� 05-17-88 -3400.00
� 1d471 3400.00 172 LVNWOOD. CITV OF - HOME BANK WORKER'S COMP REIMB. 05-17-80 3400.00
18742 650.00 91S MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK, SNC MENT. HLTH. COV. 5/88 OS-17-88 690.00 �
18743 13349.72 94 FLEMING & ASSOCIATES WORI4ER'S COMP REIM. 05-17-BB 13345.72
18806 3211.90 172 LVNWOOD� CITY OF - HOME �ANN WORKER'S COMP. RE[M�. OS-17-88 3211.90
18807 17I410.66 43 CALIF. STATE OF PAYROLL P/E 4-30-88 05-17-88 171430.66
16809 2�7850.00 99999 CAL. OEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION PYMT-PARVILAND DEVT PROP. OS-17-88 257890.00
• 18810 I5000.00 328 UNITED 5TATES ESCRON DPL-P. 6 G. HAWTHORNE OS-17-BB ISO00.00
18811 15794.84 138 HAISER PERMANENTE HEALTH PREM. 4/BB OS-1�-88 15794.84
18812 178.50 99999 5WEET'S DIVISION SU�SCRIPTION FEE 05-17-BB 178.50 •
` 18813 3532�.30 203 PAVROLL FUND PERS P/E 4/30/B8 OS-17-88 35524.30
16814 5639.20 172 LVNWOOD. CITV OF - HOME BANN WORKER'S COMP REIMB. OS-17-88 5639..
� TOTAL PREPAVS: 918603.12
�� � TOTAL VOIDS: -2321.29
,� TOTAL: 916281.83
Y
r
.,
C I T V of L V N W O O D
WARRANT DATE: OS. 17.88 W A R R A N T R E G I 5 T E R � PAGE: 2
N
'� WARRANTN AMOVNT VENDORN VENDOR NAME DESCRIPT.ION INV DATE INVOICE AM�UNT �
18819 ' 295.00 99999 ACCELERATED COMPUTER SEM. P. RICHARDS 4/88 OS-17-88 �95.00
'^ 18820 � 43.60 � ACE LVMBER & SUPPLV OPER. SVCS b REPR MAINT OS-17-88 43.60
18821 73.73 99999 ALFpED SANDOVAL OVFRPVMT-ACCT CIOSED 05-]7-88 73.73
18822 46.83 420 ALL AMERICAN HOME CENTER OPERATING SUPPLIES 05-17-88 46.83
� 18823 85.00 818 AMERICAN SOC. FOR PUBLIC ADM. MEMO. RENEWAL OS-17-88 89. W �
18824 29.00 919 MARCARET ARAUJO MEETING-9/4/8B OS-17-88 29.00
18829 2.34 14 AT & T INFORPtATION SYSTEM TELEPHONE SERVICES OS-17-88 2.34
� 18826 1040.46 1B BALL INDUSTRIES OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-17-88 1040.46
18827 B847.90 � 748 BAR�05A�1k VERA PROF. SVCS OS-17-88 8847.90 •
18628 110.04 99999 BILL 7URNER REAL ESTATE OVERPVMT-ACCT CLOSED 05-17-88 110.04
18829 388.73 �S BLUE DIAMOND MATERIALS OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-17-88 388.73
18830 30.00 99999 �RENDA IIEV REFUND 09-17-88 10.00
18831 1626.79 99999 BROOKS�PRODUCTS� INC: REPAIRS �s MAINT. OS-17-BB 1626.79
' 18832 129194.84 34 C.I.P. FUND FUND TRANSFERS OS-17-88 12�194.84
18833 33.69 99999 C,V. LIEN OVERPMT-ACCT. CLOSED OS-17-88 33.69
18834 80.00 41 CALIF PARNS 6 REC SOC MEM�. DUES-4/1-4/88 OS-17-88 80.00
�' 18839 77.00 46� CALIF MUNI TREASURERS ASSOC DUES 4/1/88-3/31/89 09-17-88 79.00 '
18836 116.24 48 CENTURV FLORIST FLORAL ARRANGEMENT OS-17-88 112.24
18837 20.00 99999 CHARLES L. PERRV OVERPYMT-ACCT CLOSED 09-17-88 20.00
' 18838 140.58 99999 CHARLES W. CARTER CO. AUTO PARTS OS-17-88 140.58
18839 400.00 230 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE CD. UNPAID POLICIES OS-17-88 400.00
18840 48.40 906 CINTAS CORP. � UNIFOIiMS 05-17-88 48.40 �
' 19841 25.00 9�3 FEV. C. . COLEMAN � MEETING-5/2/88 OS-17-88 �5.00
18892 788.50 57 COMMUTER BUS LINES BUS SERVICES OS-17-88 788.50
18843 301.Sf 901 COMPTON FRICTION MATERIALS CO. AUTO PARTS OS-17-88 301.51
18844 3088.90 792 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. CITV ENTRV MARKERS 05-17-88 3D88.50 `�
18845 220.00 bl COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL PROF. SERVICES OS-17-88 2�0.00
18846 943.73 8]4 COPP CONTRACTING PARNING LOT PRDJ. OS-17-88 943.75
� 18847 e68.63 504 DATAOUICK INFORMATION NETWORN PROF. SERVICES OS-17-88 268.63
18848 41.34 787 DAVE'S TROPHIES TROPHIES OS-17-88 41.34
18849 314.07 69 DISCOVNT EOUIPMENT CO. NALNUT TADLE OS-17-88 314.07 •.
'� 18850 45.00 99999 DISCDUNT RADIATOR SERVICE NUTO PART5 03-17-88 45.00
18891 24.69 99999 DOROTHV M. EVANS OVERPVMT-ACCT CLOSED OS-17-88 24.89
18892 n9.00 79 LAWRENCE O DUNN. SR MEETING-5/4/BB OS-17-BB 25.00 �
18853 747.36 827 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANV EOUIP. MAINT AGRMNT. OS-17-88 747.36
' 18854 1198.82 913 EASTMAN KODAK CREDIT CORP. RENTAL-EOUIP 9/88-7/88 03-17-88 1198.82
iB859 90.00 9�0 JOYCE EDNA MEETING-7/2/88 09-17-88 90.00
- I8856 887.40 99999 EIECTflO CONSTRVCTION LIGHTING PROJ. OS-17-BB 887.40
18857 29.00 86 BETTE ESPESETH MEETING-4/26/88 OS-17-88 25.00 �
l8898 7.43 88 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCT OPEFATING SUPPLIES OS-17-88 7.43
�� 18859 121.31 907 EXPRESS MESSENCER� COURIER SERV(CE 05-17-88 121.31
18860 14.00 699 FEDERAL E%PRE55 CORPORATION COVRIER SERVICES OS-17-88 14.00
18861 60.00 99999 FLORENCE E. HTGHTOWER OEVERPVMT-ACCT CLOSED OS-17-88 60.00
�- 18862 25.00 951 TIBURCIA FLORES MEETING-4/18/88 OS-17-88 29.00 ��
18863 75.76 99999 fRANK A. GONZALEZ OVERPVMT DEPDNT. COV. OS-17-88 75.76
18H64 82184.61 304 GENERAL FUND FUND TRANSFERp01-0131 OS-17-88 82184.61
�- I8865 273.00 106 GENERAL TEIEPHONE CO. 'TELEPNONE SERVICES OS-17-BB 273.08 '
18866 83167.32 941 GENERAL FUND FUND TftANSFERS OS-17-88 83167.32
18867 712.46 99999 GEORGE BRUSHER TRAFFIC ENGN. SVCS. OS-17-BB 712.46
� C I T V of L V N N O O D
WARRANT DATE: 09.17.88 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE: 3 �
n
'` WARRANTM AMOUNT VENDORN VEND�R NAME DESCRIPTION INV DATE INVOICE AMOVNT
18868 126.47 99999 GEORGE LJ. COWAN � OVERPVMT-ACCT CLOSED 09-17-BB 126.47
' SB069 110.50 q9`799 GRERTER FAI7H MISSIONARY REFUND-CANCEL EVENT OS-77-BB 110.90
18870 148.00 116 HAMMER SECURITV SERVICE SECURITY SERVICES OS-17-88 148.00
tB871 194.90 99999 HARRINCTON PLASTICS WELD[NG ROD 05-17-88 194.90 .
' 18072 29.00 1�3 JOHN HOPKINS MEETING-5/4/88 09-17-88 25.00
18873 122.55 99999 JESUS ALVARES OVERPVMT-ACCT CLOSE� 09-17-88 ]22.95
18874 50.00 99999 JOHN R. FORD DENTAL REIMDURSEMENT 09-17-88 50.00
' 18875 �23.69 135 JONES CHEMICALS. INC. CHLORINE 4 CR. I'1EM0 OS-17-BB 223.65
18876 50.00 99999 KEN RUGG OELPHI DEV. OVERPVMT-ACCT CLOSED 05-17-88 90.00 •
38877 104.20 140 NEVSTONE FORD AUTO PARTS � CR.MEMO 05-17-88 104.20
' 18878 809.00 B98 LARRV J. KOSMONT PROF. SERVICES 05-17-BB 805.00
18879 83.97 99999 L.A.TIMES ADVERTISEMEN7 OS-17-88 83.97
19800 116.77 946 LANG'S STATIONERS �FFICE SUPPLIES OS-1�-BB 116.77
' 18881 27.30 99999 LARRY C. HOLMES OVERPVMT-ACCT CLOSED OS-17-BB 27.30
18882 25.00 921 CLAUDE LAW . MEETING-5/4/86 05-17-88 25.00
18883 19.83 99999 LIDIA M. OIL OVERPVMT-ACCT CLOSED OS-17-88 19.83
18884 77.64 99999 LISS FURNITURE WAREHOUSE OFFICE FURNITURE 05-17-88 �7.24
18885 13.65 9�3 LOS ANGELES TIMES SVCS 2/8 - 5/30/88 05-17-88 13.65 .
18886 11.40 928 LOS ANGELES TIMES SVCS 2/8 - 5/2/BB 05-17-88 11.40
18807 807.49 164 �VN6ATE PRINTING CO. CORRECT. NOTIGE FORMS OS-17-BB 087.49
18888 1159.4: 168 LYNWOOD PRESS PU6LIC NOTICE OS-1�-BB 1159.42
18809 125.00 169 LVNWOOD REFRIGERATION MAINTENANCE-4/88 OS-17-88 125.00
10890 9768.77 172 LVNUUOD. CITV OF - HOME BANH WORKER'S COMP. REIMO. OS-17-88 5768.77
18891 13.79 S18 LVNWOOD AUTO PARTS AVTO PART5 03-17-88 12.79
18892 760.82 173 M M M TRUCK PARTS, (NC. AUTO PARTS OS-17-88 760.82
• 18893 451.56 176 MARDEN SUSCO 30"COUPLING AGAPTERS 05-17-88 451.56
IB894 25.00 177 ROOEPT MApKOVEC MEETING 4.26.68 05-17-88 25.00
18895 91.90 99999 MARTHA SILVA OVERPVMT-ACCT CLOSED OS-17-88 91.90
� 18896 2�.00 178 GEORCE MARTINI MEETING 4.26.BB 09-17-88 29.00
18897 431.33 99999 MASTER BOUV COMPAFTMENT DOOR 05-1�-88 431.33
18898 193.58 99999 MASTER DISTRIBUTORS OPERATING SVPPLIES 05-17-BB 193.98 •
• ]8899 22207.71 183 MELAD 6 AS50CIATES PROF. SVCS. OS-17-88 22207.71
1�8900 29.00 184 JUL10 MENDOZA MEETING 4.26.88 OS-17-86 25.00
18901 18.68 189 MC INDUSTfiIES SAFETV SUPPLIES OS-17-88 I8.68
78902 49.97 922 MID-CITIE6 STATIONERS OPERATSNG SUPPLIES OS-17-88 � 49.97
10903 IS.15 99999 MIGUEL A. RODRIGUES OVERPVMT ACCT CLOSED OS-17-88 19.19
18904 1�0.00 463 MMI MANAGEMENT SVSTEMS REGISTRATION FEE 05-17-88 150.00
18'705 279.50 187 MODII.E COMMUNICATION SER REPAIRS b. MAINTENANCE OS-17-BB 279.50
18906 71.Be 99999 MONROE CALCULATOR RIB�ONS 05-17-88 71.02
18907 6270.50 902 MOREL.AND 6. ASSOCIATES, INC. PROF. SERVICES 05-17-88 6270.50
• I0908 29.63 99999 MUNDO AU70 5ALE5 OvERPYMT-ACCT. CLOSED 05-17-88 25.63
18909 50.00 949 JAMAI. MUSHIN MEETING-9/2/80 05-17-88 50.00
18910 32.00 751 NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR UR�AN CUED INFO. PU➢. OS-17--88 32 00
189f1 50.96 99999 NHI VAN DANG OVERPVMT-ACCT CL05ED OS-17-88 50.96
� 77�.p� 769 NORUALR PONER EaVIPMENT C0. AVTO PARTS OS-17-BB 772.22
1891�
1�8913 148.54 439 OCEAN POOL SUPPLV COMFANY UNIFORM SUPPLIES OS-17-88 148.54
� 18914 210.59 99999 OFF[CE AUTOMATION PRODUCTS RIDOON & CORR. TAPE OS-17-88 210.59
iB915 29.00 952 AMEN OMAR MEETING-4/18/883 05-37-88 25.00
18916 50.00 948 EDUARD PACHEO MEETING-5/2/08 OS-17-88 SO.OG
� .
,
^ � C t T Y of L Y N W 0 O � pqGE�: 4
UARRANT DATE: 05. 17. 88 41 A R R A N T R E G I S T E�R
�
^ WARRANTM AMOVNT VENDORN VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION INV DATE 1NVOICE AMDUNT
� 18417 3929.24 201 PACIFIC BE�L � TE�EPHONE SERVICES 05-17-88 3929.24
202 PAGEANTRY PRODUCTIONS PLAOUE 05-17-88 18.74
� 18918 � AUTO PARTS OS-17-88 642.83
18979 642.83 624 PARKHOVSE TIRE C0.
208 PETTY CASH - CHECKING REIMO-PETTV CASH OS-17-88 1392.50
18920 1392.70 LEASE-POSTAGE METER OS-17-88 350.17
� 18921 190.17 371 PITNEV-BOWES 09-17-88 116.50
18922 116.50 �231 PRECISION AUTOMOTIVE EMPOL.PADVERTISEMENTS OS-17-88 881.19 ,
18923 881.19 99999 PRESS TELEGRAM qU70 PARTS 05-17-BB 200.00
18924 ��0.00 �93 PRICE SAVEFS
18929 180.00 442 PROGRAMMED FOR SUCCESS OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-17-B8 180.OD
OS-17-89 30.00 •
18926 30.00 216 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPL MAP 3038 OS-17-88 340.00
SB927 340.00 930 PSG SEWER SERV[CE5� INC. SEWER CLEANING p5-17-88 9S��s�
18920 957.90 '�9999 PUBLIC PEFSONNEL CONSULTANTS TEST �OOIlLETS OS-17-BB 179.25 �
SUDSCRIPTION .
16929 1�9.29 99999 PU�LICATIONS ORDERS GRAFFETI VD. FENCE OS-17-88 2150.60
10930 2190.60 219 OUHLITV FENCE CO.. INC. OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-17-88 121.15
18931 121.f5 99999 RADIO SHACH SEALING TAPE OS-17-88 302.26
18932 302.26 19 NELIABLE-FISLH OS-17-80 314.92
38933 314.92 22S RENTERIA AUTO PANT5 AUTD PARTS
18934 69.23 99999 ROSES TO GO FLORAL ARRANGEMENT OS-17-88 69.23
18935 1O130.05 804 RVIZ ENGINEERING COMPANY OPERATINGOSUPPLIES OS-17-88 30138.0�
• SB936 38.77 749 SAFEWAV SICN C0. OS-17-88 � 1155.87
18937 1159.87 235 SAN DIE60 FIRE E�UIP. C0. � OVERPVMT-ACCT CLOSED 05-17-BB 39.91
18938 39.91 99999 SIIER O. LEARV pqINT SUPPLIES 0�-17-80 2`10.36
18939 �290.36 926 SHERMIN-NILLIAMS CO.
]8940 4344.15 246 50 CALIF EDISON COMPANV LIOHT & POWER SVCS OS-17-88 4344.15
18941 84.00 537 50. CA MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC MEETING�-4518/88VI5 OS-17-88 25.00
16942 25.00 947 DALE STEE�E MEETING-5/2/88 OS-17-88 25.00
18943 ^.5.00 934 VtENT SUIFT �
18944 25.15 99999 THE NEDGEWOOD FUND IV OVERPVMT-ACCT CLOSED 05-17-BB 495.49
� 18945 492.49 26� DILL THOMAS PHOTOGRAPHS
OS-17-88 626.00
19946 626.00 267 TIMELV TEHPORARV SERVICE TEMP. SERVICES pg_17-BB 1440.00 ,
]8947 1440.00 99999 TDRRANCE IOSS CONTROL CORP. FVNDTTRANSFERES OS-17-88 BS256.27 •
� 18948 85256.27 271 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND pVERPVt1T-ACCT CLOSED OS-17-88 �3.13
18949 23.13 99999 TRANS OHIO BANK
18950 60.00 273 TRW INFORHATION SERVICES P STAGESFEE'PERMIT OS-17-BB 1000.00
� t8951 3000.00 276 U.S. POSTMASTER OS-17-88 125.00
18952 123.00 99999 UCLA BUSINESS FORESCAST REGIST. FEE 05-17-88 494.38
]8953 494.38 279 UNISOURCE %EROX PAPER
� 18954 150.00 732 JOV VALENTINE MINUTES 4/12 � 4/26/BB 05-17-88 I50.00
OPERATING SUPPLIE5 OS-17-88 142.54
16955 142.54 99999 VALVATE ASSOCIATE5 FUND TRANSFERS 05-17-BB 5734.65
18936 3734.63 �87 WATER FUND
REPAIRS S� MAINT. OS-17-88 1140.94
lyqg7 1140.94 2`77 WESTERN WATER WORKS OS-17-88 68402.92
18958 68402.92 413 WESTERN WASTE INDUSTRIES FRANCHISE 05-17-88 958.15 _,
18959 958.19 483 WESTERN PETROLEUM INC. GASOLINE OS-17-BB 40.00
� 18960 40.00 298 WHEEL MAN TIRE SERVICE AUTO PATRS
18961 63.30 301 WILLIAMS HRDURE S� PLMBG OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-17-B8 63.1U
18962 6.43 99999 WIILIE T. RANDLE,JR. OVERPVMT CLOSED 05-17-BB 6.43
� 18963 143.13 308 ZUMAR INDUSTHIES. 1NC. OPERATING SUPPLIES OS-17-88 143.13
3067692.17
. 1067692 17 �
PREPAID: 18742-43�19806-14 -
VGI�S: � 11304.1�018.12749�,13847.14590.14b24.14659.15091.15723.15658.15802�15807.16365,16389-90.1�6462,16462.17231. �
� 18099, 18621
r
.
r
r
•
.. •
� �
DATE: May 17, 1988
T0: HCNORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCZL
FROM: Kenrick R. Karefa-JOhnson, Interim Director ///.
Community Development Department � �
SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATIONS TO THE CITY OF LYNWOOD
INCLUDING CENSUS TRACTS 5404, 5354, 5406, 5414 AND 5415
PURPOSE
The purpose of this report is to outline the steps required to be
completed by City Council and staff to initiate proceedings to
annex portions of County unincorporated territory to the City of
Lynwood including census tracts 5404, 5354, 5406, 5414 and 5415.
FACTS
1. On April 12, 1988, City Council directed staff to investigate
the steps required to be completed to initiate proceedings for
the annexation of unincorporated County territory to the City
of Lynwood. In response, Staff has identified several potential
areas for annexation that border Lynwood on the west. One of
these areas is Census tract 5404 which has been the subject of
prior annexation attempts by the City. Another area is Census
tract 5354 which is located west of Alameda Street and north of
103rd Street. A third area is comprised of three census tracts
(5406, 5414, and 5415) and is bordered on the north by Imperial
Avenue, on the east by Mona Avenue and Alameda Street, on the
south by Rosecrans Avenue, and on the west by Wilmington
Avenue. All of these areas are contiguous with the City of
Lynwood, however, Census tract 5354 is not contiguous with the
other areas being considered for annexation. A map of the
proposed annexation areas is attached for City Councils' review
and comment.
2. On August 7, 1984, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1232,
applying preannexation zoning to Census Tract 5404 and, on the
same date, certified a Negative Declaration pertaining to the
annexation and prezoning of Census Tract 5404.
3. On November 19, 1985, City Council held a public hearing on the
annexation of Census Tract 5404 (Annexation 3A) and then
subsequently terminated annexation proceedings for the area. A
prior application for annexation of the same area (initiated on
May 14, 1984) was also withdrawn on December 5, 1984.
� 4. On April 29, 1988, LAFCO staff informed City staff that the
following steps needed to be taken for reconsideration of
annexation of Census Tract 5404 along any other areas including
Census Tracts 5354, 5406, 5414 and 5415:
A. City Council must adopt three (3) resolutions incTuding the
following:
1) Resolution on Sphere of Influence - This resolution
requests the Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO)
to find the areas proposed to be annexed (Census
Tracts 5354, 5406, 5414 and 5415) to be within
Lynwood's Sphere of Influence. Census Tract 5404 had
been previously found to be within Lynwood's Sphere of
Influence.
DISK D-9:Annex
AGF.NDA ITEM
��
�
I
� �
2) Resolution Making Application - This resolution
makes the application to LAFCO for the annexation of
Census Tracts 5404, 5354, 5406, 5414, 5415, or any
portion thereof, and their detachment from the
Consolidated Fire Protection District and Firestone
Disposal District.
3) Joint Tax Resolution - This resolution between the
City of Lynwood and Los Angeles County approves and
accepts the negotiated exchange of property tax
revenues resulting from the annexation.
5. LAFCO staff further informed the City that there is no need to
conduct new proceedings concerning the pre-zoning of Census
Tract 5404 (Annexation No. 3A). However, new proceedings will
have to be undertaken to pre-zone Census Tract 5354, 5406,
5414 and 5415 since these areas were not included as part of
any prior annexation application.
6. The City will have to submit two applications to LAFCO since
the areas to be annexed are not contiguous (See attached map).
, Zn addition, a$250.00 fee fill be required for each
application. Also, new exhibits will have to be prepared
showing the proposed annexation areas.
7. If City Council approves the submittal of new applications for
annexation of the subject territories, LAFCO may consider the
applications in July. City Council should note, however, that
the Government Code requires that a report be prepared by the
City discussing the feasibility of the proposed annexations and
the City's ability to service the proposed annexed areas. The
report should also discuss the transfer of tax revenues
between agencies and jurisdictions serving the area and
resulting revenues. This report should be prepared as part of
the application for annexation. The cost of the report would
range from $5,000.00 to $6,000.00.
8. If the reorganizations are approved by LAFCO, the City will be
required to hold a public hearing on the reorganizations/
annexations. If more than 50� of registered voters file a
written protest to the annexations, the annexation proceedings
are terminated. If 25-498 of the registered voters file a
written protest, an election is held to determine whether the
annexations shall take place. If not otherwise "protested-out"
the City Council may adopt a final resolution ordering the
annexations.
RECOMMENDATION
- That City Council adopt the attached Resolution directing City
staff to (1) prepare the required resolutions for City Council
action and make the neccessary applications to LAFCO to initiate
annexation proceedings; (2) initiate proceedings to pre-zone
Census Tract 5343, 5406, 5414 and 5415; and (3) pay five hundred
($500.00) in processing fees to LAFCO.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No.
Location Map
DISK D-9:Annex
�
I
I
I
� �
RESOI;UTION N0.
n RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LYNWOOD DIRECTING CITY STAFF TO INITIATE
PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF CENSUS TRACTS
5404, 5406, 5414, 5415, 5354, AND TO MAKE THE
NECESSARY APPLICATIONS TO THE LOCAL AGENCY
FORMATION COMMISSION.
WHEREAS, the City of Lynwood seeks to pursue annexation of the
subject unincorporated territories (Census Tracts 5404, 5406, 5414,
5415 and 5354) and,
WHEREAS, the City of Lynwood has determined that the proposed
annexations will be beneficial to the community and to persons
residing within the areas proposed to be annexed;
� NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council directs City staff to pursue
said annexations as follows:
Section 1. The City Council directs City staff to prepare the
necessary Resolutions for City Council approval including the
Resolution on Sphere of Influence, the Resolution Making
Application and the Joint Tax Resolution.
Section 2. The City Council directs City staff to initiate
proceedings to pre-zone Census Tract Nos. 5354, 5406, 5414, 5415
and prepare a Negative Declaration pursuant to said pre-zoning.
Section 3. The City Council approves payment of five Hundred
dollars ($500.00) in processing fees to the Local Agency Formation
Commission (LAFCO).
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 1988.
PAUL RICHARDS� II� MAYOR
City of Lynwood
ATTEST:
ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kenrick R. Karefa-JOhnson City Attorney
Interim Director
Community Development Department
DISK D-9:Annex
'
I
� . �
FIPESTONE BL �
•
� L
` ° Proposed Annexatlons Areas
° � sT CITY. COUNCIL
. . MAY 17, 1988 �
� T ACT ti _
, .� ,,<,
�.,
SOUTryEq
B D ST -
N
< AV
S: O
< O
S N
¢ y
7
O �
K
". U .S,Sx.n
r{ .
�+^ B�
"�t W t t
�n3RO ST
t�
}
' i �� •• timll.
g g ceNrua
Qa ,
_ �
s, a� u ,,; a�
5
_ . � �i. z � � t
. . . O � i.�:_'an.'.
p �;,:
- f ,..,.., �% .
• rM 4'
t O '
. o r�'r: HWY
' IMPERIAL . � t�" •; .
a
R Y,
� �
. . . , �I r,' n :I , .p:, E
, F„g... '_' _
�' : � i o , „ � .
x f C, SUS TRAC7 : --;
� e ; 5406,
<.,,
' , b ; F .3 n e�. � ..��.. �
t D
• . � s ,..,. + � . � m .
tx °
e �. r s
r�rr.�� r�wr�
I " °�aa � �x„c,.
� e �� a : ;
,F-.,. �Hs >3 �$,. y , <
e seauNOO � 3 ' CENSUS'� �,EN ae
, . ; TRAGC, ' � � ;T#?A $ .�
� ' � °,'S41 "`
E� �
� � .. �•.
< � �y
� � 3 Y'.w i: .
Z �
J V
; a
. � f ��,, `, gt�'.
� 5 i��
< S� m
° r
5T ' �< t n
' \' y � _
' . � OS AAN � AV north.
\
• i
�
DATE: MAY 17, 1988
T0: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNLIL
FROM: CHARLES GOMEZ, LITY MANAGER ��
SUBJECT: BUSINESS LICENSE SUSPENSION
BACKGROUND
Staff has been recently apprised that there is a business operating under false
pretenses as a therapy center. The Code provides measures to be taken whenever
a business is operating in a questionable manner and provides for the suspension
of the business license after a public hearing is held.
A��ALYS I S
The two methods available for suspending or revoking a business license are:
(1). City Manager calls for a public hearing before the Council to announce the
intent, then suspends and (2). the City Louncil, upon discovery of an illicit
operation, can call a public hearing and then either suspend or revoke the
license. It appears that the Manager's public hearing will be a good starting
point in an attempt to resolve the problem at Jan's Accupressure establishment.
CONLLUSION
This communique is to notify you that there will be a public hearing on this
matter scheduled for June 21.
fl3EY.D4 ITEM
�
� �
DATE: MAY 17, 1988
T0: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CHARLES GOMEZ, CITY MANAGER
SUBJELT: CAREER CRIHIIIAL APPREHENSION PROGRAM (CCAP)
BACKGROUND
On April 5, 198� the Lity Council approved the participation of tfie Lynwood
Sheriff's Station in the Career Criminal Apprehension Program.
ANALYSIS
The participating stations will all be sharing in the cost, however, it will he
administered by Captain Elmer 0. Olmohundro of the Lakewood Station and that
piece of information should have been inserted in the resolution that was
adopted. Similarly, the resolution should contain a provision for tfie matching
funds.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff requests that Resolution 88 be amended to include the two provisions
sited above.
AGE}IDA ITEM
• e
1
_J
� �
.:��OL'u i I iiN 6u-
A RESOLUTION OF THE LYNWOOD CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE LYNWOOD
SHERIFF'S STATION TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR A GRANT FOR LAW
ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES TO DCJP
WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department desires to undertake
a certain project designated Lareer Criminal Apprehension Program to be funded in
part from funds made available througfi State General Funds FY 88/89 as authorized by
Chapter 129Z of the 19II2 Statutes for the Career Criminal Apprehension Program,
administered by the Office of Criminal Justice Planning (hereafter referred to as OCJP).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Captain Elmer A. Olmohundro of the
Lakewood Sheriff's Station is authorized on its behalf to submit an Application for
Grant for Law Enforcement Purposes to OCJP and is authorized to execute on behalf of
the City of Lynwood the Grant Award for law enforcement purposes, including any
extensions or amendments thereof.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant agrees to provide all matching
funds required for said project (including any extensions or amendments thereof), and
that cash will be appropriated as required thereby.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that grant funds received hereunder shall not be
used to supplement law enforcement expenditures controlled by this body.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of May 1988.
PAUL H. RICHARDS, II
MAYOR, LITY OF LYNWOOD
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO CONTEPJT:
ANDREA L. HOOPER CHARLES G. GOMEZ
CITY CLERK, CITY OF LYNWOOD LITY MANAGER, CITY OF LYNWOOD
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
HENRY S. BARBOSA
CITY ATTORNEY, LITY.OF LYNWOOD
' + �
STATE OF CALIFOP.NIA ! ,
) ss.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, the undersigned City Clerk of the Lity of Lynwood, do hereby certify that
the above and foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of said City
on the 17th day of May , 1988, and passed by the following
Vote: I
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
City Clerk, City of Lynwood
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, the undersigned City Llerk of the City of Lynwood, and Clerk of the City
of said City, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct
copy of Resolution No. 88- on file in my office and that said resolution was
adopted on the date and by the vote therein stated.
Dated this day of , J983.
City Clerk
I
� �
�Iaunfi� vf ��ns �ngrlrs ,,,,.
, � �� (�ffire nf thr �shrriff `� �:."
� �, �
�,:;, f�nll nf �Juslirr �
� �' �.,.o.... ..
�us �,nge[es,(Califurnin 9D01^_
SMEAMAN BLOCN, S�cnvr ( 537-6111
May 9, 1968
Members of City Council
City of Lynwood
11330 Bullis Road
Lynwood, California 90262
Dear Council Members,
On Saturday, July 16, 1988, KHJ-TV, Channel 9, will broadcast an
eight-hour telethon to raise funds for the Sheriff s Department's
Substance Abuse Naccotics Education (SANE) pzogram.
As part of this fund raising effort, we are soliciting
individuals, businesses, and organizations to purchase one or
more hours of telephone sponsorship time. With 30 fully
sponsored telephone spots it will be possible to raise $180,000.
The telephones will be situated on a three tiec platform with ten
phones per tier. The bottom row of phones will be sold for
$1,000 per hour, per phone, the middle row for $750, and the top
row for $500. The price differential is caused by the lower rows
receiving more on-air visibility during the broadcast. In return
for the purchased sponsorship of a phone, a placard with the
individual's, business', oz otganization's name will be placed in
front of the phone.
All donations for SANE are deposited into the Sheriff's Youth
Foundation (Tax Exempt #97-4047797), a non-profit organization,
and are therefore tax deductible.
AGHIDA ITEl1
3�
� �
Council Members -2- May 9, 1988
I have taken the libecty of attaching a departmental press
release on the SANE telethon that you should find quite
infocmative. •
If you would like to be a sponsor, or have any questions
regardin9 this effort, please contact me or Lieutenant Ray
Sanchez at (213) 537-6111 so that we may assist you.
Sincerely,
SHERMAN BLOCK, SHERIFF
� �
�� � _ � /;
. � ,, ;u-' J � �L'11=k�
Stuart L. Hansell, Captain
Commander, Sheriff's Lynwood Station
Attachment
� �
(�Iuurtfu IIf �Lu� �nqrlrs
o,.o,.,
�
� (�ffirr nf 1hr �hrriff �� i�'
�� ,� : � �:;�-�• :.
''��,� �tl! nf Jusiicr '
�, �' 4�„0..,. ..
3Gns Angeles,(Califurnm 9001^_
SMERM�N BLOCK, sw[wirr
SANE TELETHON
On Saturday, July 16, 1988, Los Angeles County Sheriff Sherman
Block will host a prime time telethon sponsored by RHJ-TV,
Channel 9. The telethon, to be broadcast from 5:00 p.m, to 1:00
a,m., will raise badly needed funds to support the sheriff's
Department's Substance Abuse Narcotics Education (SANE) program,
Currently, the SANE program is in 44 of the 54 school districts
served by the Sheriff's Department. Expanding SANE to all
districts requires additional personnel as well as support
materials. Since drug abuse is a community problem, a vital
component to ensure the success of this program is community
financial support, This is the reason for the telethon.
SANE is a community based program that stresses a strong
partnership effort between law enforcement, schools, and the
community in an effort to diminish the demand for drugs.
Specially trained deputies work closely with the schools and
communities in a cooperative effort to teach the children that
there are positive alternatives to substance abuse.
To do this, SANE utilizes a teacher/deputy led approach to
substance abuse. The fourth, fifth and sixth grades are
targeted and are taught four major lessons:
1. Coping skills for dealing with peer pressure;
2. Decision making skills;
3. Enhanced self esteem; and,
4. Accurate information about the dangers of alcohol,
drugs and tobacco.
Research indicates that students entering higher grade levels
must endure a tremendous amount of peer pressure. Coping skills
must be developed and solidified prior to the child entering
� these higher grade levels. The fourth, fifth and sixth grades
provide an ideal setting for developing and refining those
skills that the child will thereafter utilize in maintaining a
drug-free life.
The SANE telethon staff is located in Room 267 of the Hall of
Justice and may be contacted at (213) 974-4220.
i � �
ORD,INANCE N0.
� AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LY��WOOD AMENDING ORDINANCE IJO. 1210 PROVIDING
FOR AN AUTO ALLOWANCE FOR COUNCIL MEMBERS
The City Council of the City of Lynwood HEREBY DOES ORDAIN
• AS FOLLOWS:
• Section 1. In addition to the satary estat�lished by
Section 1 of Ordinace No. ]026, members of the City Council shall be reimbursed �
for expenses incurred by them in the use of their personal vefiicles in the
performance of their duties in the sum of Five Hundred ($500) dollars per month,
effective January ], 1988.
Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, or the
application thereof to any person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid
or unconstitutional irt the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordi-
nance or its application to other persons or places. The City Council hereby
declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each section, subsection,
sub-division, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the
fact that any one or more sections, sub-divisions, sentences, clauses, phrases,
or portions, or the application thereof to any person or place, be declared
invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 3• The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed
to certify as to the passage of this ordinance and to ca�se the same to be
published once in the Lynwood Press, a newspaper of general circulation, printed,
published, and circulated in the City of Lynwood.
FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the City Councit of said City
held on the day of , 198a, and finally ordered published
at a regular meeting of said Council held on the day of >
t988.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
!� _�
P UL H. RICHARDS, II, Mayor •
City of Lynwood
ATTEST:
ANDREA L. HOOPER, City Clerk
City of Lynwood
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: _
HENRY'BARBOSA, City Attorney CHARLES G. GOMEZ, City Manager
Gity of Lynwood Lity of Lynwood _
�
AGENDA ITEM a
33
� �
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
LOUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Lynwood, and
ex-officio clerk of the Council of said City, do hereby certify that the
above is a true and correct copy of O�dinance No.' adopted by the
Lity Council of the City of Lynwood, and that the same was passed on the
date and by the vote therein stated.
Dated this day of , .198$•
(SEAL) City Clerk, City of Lynwood
� �
cit �- �YNR'OOD �
,� .. . �,..
�•�*� . c�1 City �1Aeeting C6oQQenges i i i i(�
� 11330 BULLIS ROAD
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262
(2 7 31 603-0220
I2tT�R-OT'PICE MEr10
DATE: b4AY 17, 1988
TO: THE HONORABLE r4AYOR AND COUNCILr4EDiBERS
FROM: ANDREA L, HOOPrR, CI:'Y CLERK�
SUBJECT: INFORD4ATION ONL� - ONr (1) VACANCY
RECREATION AND PARS.S C0�4r7ISSI0Id
The term of Bette Espeseth, Recreation and Parks Commissioner
will expire June, 1988. This is for information only,
Nominations at Council's regular neeting of June 7, 1988.
Appointment at Council's regular neeting of June 21, 1988.
ALE:bl
AGF.�IDA ITEM
3�
! •
��� cit of �YNWOOD �,
�� � � City �Ueeting CI�oQQenges "i ��� ��.
i i
11330 BULLIS ROAD
LVNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262
(213) 603-0220
IidTPR-OFrIC� DSEMO
� DATE: AtAY 17, 19II8
T0: TAE HONORABLF. lZAYOR A2m COUNCILD4EDiBERS
� FROM: ANDREA L. HOOPTR, CITS.' CLTRI:��
SUBJECT: INFORTIATION 02tLY - TF.RD1 F.XP?RR6
HOUSING AND COP4D2UtdITY ADVISORY BOARD
Please see attached letter in reglyds to the two terr�s of
Josie �5'iseman and Reverand Leonard Gibbs. Their terr�s, ho�v-
ever, will expire in June.
The following term, also expires in .7une:
Lawrence 0. Dunn, Sr.
Nominations at Council's regular meeting of June 7, 1988,
Appointment at Council's regular neetin� of June 21, 1988,
ALH:bl
Attachment
� AGENDA ITII!
�J
� �
�� � Cit3 o �YNwoon
� �
�� � �t Ctty �Ueettng C�aQQenges i�i � I� i
11330 BULLIS ROAD �
i
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262
�zi3�so3.ozzo R E C E I V E p I
CITY OF LYi�"„�pJ
� CITY !, ..... .. _ ._...�
INTER-OFFICE MEMO
APR `�7 1938
AM PM
DATE: April 27, 1988 7�8�9i10i1Ii12ili2i3,4�q
T0: ����ea L. Hooper, City Clerk !
FROM: Arthur N. Waller, Housing and Commun�ty
Development Coordi'ator
SUBJECT: NON-ATTENDANCE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERS
Josie Wiseman and Reverend Leonard Gibbs have been dismissed
from the HDC Advisory Board due to excessive and consecutive
absences. The Citizen Participation Plan and HCDA guidelines
provide for automatic dismissal of inembers after three ex-
cutive absences. Both Mrs. Wiseman and Reverend Gibbs have
more than the three necessary for dismissal.
� � �
� c�t of �YNWOOD �
�,. �.,�.�„
�.�.� � �1 City :�Ueeting C',hnQQenges �' I � �
' � "� 11330 BULUS ROAD .
- LVNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262
� �� (213) 603�0220 �
I IdmTR-OFF I CF. 44El40
DATE: MAY 17, 1988
T0: THE HONORABLE D4AYOR AND COUNCIL1iEMIIFRS
FROM: ANDREA L. HOOPER, CITY CLF.RP.�
SUBJECT: ONE (1) VACAI7CY - P�RSOtdtdEL COriMISSION
It was announced �or information onl�� at Council's regular
meeting of h4ay 3, 1988, the terM of Arnold Litke, Personnel
Cominissioner, will expire in D4ay,
Nominations are in order.
Appointment at Council's regular Meeting of June 7, 1988.
**Letter attached froM Arnold Litl.e requesting consideration
for reappointment. Also find attached letter from Kent Swift
requesting consideration for appointment,
ALH:bl
Attachment
AGEtIDS ITEM
��
� �
�� � ��t � �YNwoon � �
� �,.��. �,,.
�''�"� � Ctty vUe¢ting (,�' oQQeages � I I I�'
� 17330 BU�US ROAD
IYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262
(2131603-D220 � � .
r� 1988 RECEIV''D I
CITY OF LYI<:'C�J
Ci�Y C: .' ... .._
MAY Ol 1938 �
�M rr.j
7
!
Dear Mayor and Members of the Lynwood City Coun�il:
� �
On October 4, 1975 I retired from City of Lynwood employment as a
Captain in the Fire Department after 27 years of service. The next
year on December 7, 1976 I had the honor of being appointed to serve
as a member of the City of Lynwood Personnel Board.
My active involvement in the valuable work of thls commission has been
a source of considerable pleasure to me. My present appointment to the
Personnel Board expires in May 1988. Therefore, I am taking this oppor-
tunity to thank you for having allowed me to serve on the•.Board and request
youz considera[ion for reappointment.
Sincerely,
'�
��'�� .��-�
Arnold G. Litke
� �
� �it � �YNWOOD �
�..,.,�.�...
Q�^� �l. Ctty �Ueeting CI�aQQenges �' I I I�
� 11330 BUILIS ROAD
LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262
(213�603�0220
May 12, 1988
Mayor Paul Richards and
Members of the City Council
Dear Mayor Richards,
On behalf of the members of the Personnel Board it is with' great
pleasure that we reco�nend the reappointment of Arnold Litke as a
member of this coaunission.
Mr. Litke has served the City of Lynwood as a dedicated Personnel
Board member and we strongly reco�end reappointment for another
term.
Sincerely,
������ �
Merl Felker
Vice Chairman
Personnel Board
� �
;� �.
RECE�VED I
C.r�• c � ��•••000
�- . . .,�
MAY U y lggg
AM PM
May 9, 19ae 7i8i9�i6illi12ili2i3i4i5�6
Mr. Douglass Robinson, !
Director of Personnel , � .
11330 Bullis Rd., J �
Lynwood, CA 90262
Dear Mr. Robinson,
Greetings. Because the current term of one of the members of the
personnel commission has expired, I hereby request that my name be
placed in the nomination process for consideration for that position.
' It is my understanding that this letter will serve as an official re-
quest. However, if that is not possible, please advise me of the
necessary procedures one must take.
Your immediate reply to the contents of this letter is truly appreciated.
Thank you in advance for your attention to this letter.
Sincerely,
i
// �
�� �, - J �"
Ka Swift
cc:Lynwood City Council Members
s'�1; ���Y Ur LY��y�VUV Rr-CEIVED I
� � � • 11]]0 lUWS ROAO • CITY CF _'.+� 00�
_�,, ,
�".'y:� � L'lNWOOD, CAIIFORNIA 90I62 CITY CLERKS U; :•::c
n,�� s»-0.� APR 2 8 1988 QM
--- --- – - — - - - - --- -- - --- - -� --
--"— NOTICE OF INTENTION FOR CHARITABLE SOLICITATION7�8�9�10ill�12�1�2�3�4i
av
City of Hope, A National Medical Center &$ec.I��1Ru�earch /
JNUAL �
EaA� EvENT f� IN THE CITY OF Lynwood � �
DDRE55 ' C1TV . 21P CODE TELEPMONE
208 W. 8th Street Los An eles Ca 0014 13)626-4611
ATE Of1GAN12ED �NGORPORATED TAX EXEMP7 VREVIOUS LICENSE NUMBER
1913 Yes 953435919
ROCEE0.5TOBEAVVLIEDTOWMATPURVOSE/USE to be used for pati�ent care and research
of the ma'or diseases of our era.
YPE OF APPEAL TVPE OF DONATIONS DATE151 OF SOLICITATION TERM OF qtOUESTED LICENSE/PEiiM1T
ES�DENTIAL XX
OMMERCElINDUSTRV � FROM TO FROM TD
Funds 6/26/88 7 17 88 6/26/88 7/17/88
iOAIS SOLICITATION WILI BE MADE BV INDICATE COMPENSATION, SALARIES,
DCAL .R � 5�� �� COMM ISSI UNS ETC. PAI D TO
A1 I f ORS _ TV/RADIO � 80X OFFICE _ STATE DETAILS ON
TATE � �VOLUNTEERS X2S MAIL _ OTHER: CONDUCTORS _ MANAGERS_ REVERSESIOE
��ATIONAL NEWSPAVER _ SALE . — PROMOTORS _ SOLICITORS_ N�A
NAME DF OAGANI2ATION TO BE BENEFITED ADDRESS TELEPMONE
City of Hope Hospital Duarte, Ca ( 13)626-4611
OATE OF ACTIVIT'
DESCRIPTION OF WIiAT IT DOES LOCATION OF ACTIVITY June. 26 19 H
TAX EXEMPT NO.
e b ure All of Southern California 953435919
�'�� AOMISSION TO EVENT BV: NUMBER PRINTED NUMBEFED
N/A PRICE WITM TAX
TICKET INVITATION DONATION
�ROJECTED EXPEND�TURES FOR TMIS SOLICITATION: �
�q��5 � PUBLICITY TRANSPOHTATION
_qgpq TELEPHONE RENTAL-EQUIVMENT _
STATIONERY �� PURCMASE�E�UIPMENT
• � D `P-�� f ��`___�__ Rq'1EovAT10N CMPAGcc
=A.VQP. "__ P.DVFOT!SING —..
NUSIC FOOD RESOLD .- �PER PLATE COSTS�
>p$TAGE 4.�— DECORATIONS MERCHANDISESOLD
�RINTING �4L � V V V ENTEHTAINERS OTHER EXPENSE: .
:QSfUMES � RENTAL-BUILDING
UNIFORMS PERMITS-LICENSE TOTAL � 1 S_ O� OO _
OFFICERS NAME AND TITLE ITWO REQUIREDI ADDRESS TELEPNONE
�.��t�.�.dt�t�� Lee Graff, V. President 208 W. 8th Street, L.A.Ca 900i213)626-461
iiqnnurs � 'r'` /�"-� %��/`
Samuel Simorr Treasurer 208 W. 8th Street, L.A.Ca 900 4
v�+m osrne 6 titu 13 ) 6 2 6— 4 61
/ w -
Siqneture 'T`� -���•�� .` �
ERSON IN CMARGE�OF APPEAL AODRE55 TELEPMONE
�.;,,t,,,,,,. Jeff Sheets Director 208 W. 8th Street L.A.Ca 900 13)626-461
Si�aturc Z`'`��
�STRUCTION : Compl�t� in Omit. Wrlt� "NondNOi WDIiuD4" H wo.oOri�ta ►rniGnt �n0 S<ntrv u0mtvra �r� prdwn0. An�cn n�rnr, stlCr�st ot
Nrcns. 0ir�crora of ZM W�I1iZ�ti011. Liit �II [Of1ViWliOBtlOd Tb�i� UN p�aD�nOISV1� iOr C�b1W�� VN� imm�Oi�tNY M�binp Mif �olieintion or o.ov�0� snnu��
�tllt. FO� AI�Ci�I MML NIiCiLl10A }CI \NtNH O�'��flL�ti01�. �TIKM MItnW:I\IiOA M�ff�Ol�t.
CI[y Of
. . Date Approved
City Clerk •
sea� p�pA IT�l1
__ ,
_ ___ _.----- -
, ;;s :=.x:.
- � ; " i . � i � : 1 e ' '" { . � . _ ` : � � � ; � �' i ' � . tS � `�t + ,� _
( _�.. . � , i � � ' . � � . � 2 I � 1 �. �._• f � � , � � A �.
_...' . ' �' � i - � � � y i{�.,.,'"hjn .n t .
, ; . R"S
� '- ` ` PATIENT ' �`
.. � , i xr�����.,���, �
� , ' ' ,���.
�--� I'HILOSOI'HY :; . �. ADMISSIONS t .3��£t�� ��
i �. � �(' ..' ?t p �" ,. i�
� r � ( n'
.� ^� � hat "Health is a Human Right" is the i I � he key questions asked of [tase seeking �_ '����, ��
� �� basic philowphy of the City of Hope. � �� care and treatrtx�nt at the Ciry of Hope � ' � i . �
� I[ begins wi[h medical �are of --� -� are: Do you have cancer or one of the � .r e�
� � unsurpassed qualiry, administered with deep � ' ; other major diseases we treaV Is there wme- � ^ ��{ a��
I� � respect fa [he digniry of patientc 1 i thing we can do, sorre veatrtimt which will i ''�� '"�
1• i A"home-away-from-home" se[ting ��' ���"5 restae qualiry of life, perhaps eHec[ a cure7 -' ..� ,, ;
� helps speed healirg. Recognizing [he devaStaF ,..._. _.. �_.. Admission is rese�ved for those whose ,�
(� � i im t of ma or diseases— h call , finan-
� ng pac j p ysi y � I + diseasefallswi[hinthemedicalmncemsofthe •
��"�" cial and emotional —Ci ol Ho Veatz the ;� ' 1 �
` ly y ry pe . ; � Ciry of Hope, and whose illness is at a stage � Promise ��.
whole person... not just the disease. i--- �—��-- which can respond ro definitive therapy. "�-�
At the City of Hope we ask this question �� you may call us at the numbers listed ����- O�
��" — I� � of those who wffer from major diseases: °Can -��� i pe�ow [o ask about our self-referral treaunent
' we help7" If the armNer is "yes;" veatment is !�- "� "� ��
� j , � � programs. ' Hope
� . avaifable. � °�
���� Research will continue [o unlock [he � �' �
I causes of life-[hreatenin disease and, evern !� �-�'� -' i ��_��
g i Coruultatlon
�._._ �_ wally, give us the methods [o cure. The goal of ,_._ .._ _;... City of Hope also oHers a consultation service ro
� Ihe ex[ensive research program at the Ciry of I i I private physicians and ins[ituuons on behalf of
Ho arMBeckmanResearchlnstiwteisroelimi �� `�"""'
�" �- pe � ; ; their pztients. 7he exper[ise of the medical staR is
nate killer diseases hom our lives—this is the ��-•��-� - available to Ixal medical professionals in com-
r_ pranise of Hope. ., �.., S._k , munities and govemment installations both here
! ' andabroad. '
.1-- `�- ° i' Admission and conwltalion procedures -� '�
� I ' i � are simple. Infamation will be provided upon -� � ''-
j�_) �, _� � request Such requests should be directed to: ? � ' e "'� `��
� j i � City of Hope, Referral Office � � � ��
i i._.i..' .' ! r. � ..
I"� �- , � t I500 East Duarte Road, Duarte. CA 91010 � ;�� f
�.__�. � j —�-- 800-423-7119 �or in Califomia� 800-535-1390 "' i�• p � .
.a
i-�-i ... �� /' �� ��
, _ f ' + ..� I . I
�., ,�...� � t ' ' i � �1 • � ��
�_�� � . .. � '- ' ' I � �� y1. .�;' �
� � i ! .... ' THANK YOU t ,� ��ai i'.i
-• i-� Your efforts have helped create one of the ��� ' '` �
� � � ; � world's finest hospitals and research iru[itu[es � ' ��� �' �� �
; i I Support your CHy of Hope Campalgn �, �, ��, �`�',�; `
1 r
.�._�.. • ! � SeMIaaOGiumalli[ttaWrr ' i' ,i..
_.� i � aMiNamatim ,"�,�.
; , ; : . , , ., . �nie�rittt
-� � � � tny ot ►+ope� ; s•r� :�a�rme
� �� � � + � 208 West Eighth Stree[ , �
� �� � � Los Mgeles, CA 900I4 �
� '°� " ' �213� 626-4611 i .
, .
f _� ,,. � -, t
i � ;g' ; .
•
i �.
-- . ,
_�-- .._,_...... _ _. _:_.. _ _ - —_--•�- — - ' .
— »--. --t— . . t s . . -.,. 3 , s � � � , . � i , � � , "i i .r•'.
- . 1 . .'. ' � {... i � . i � ; � ; � ; ' ; . i. ' � I ' 1 .
; .� MEDICAL � � I'ILOT � �-; MEDICAL �.:�
_, �_: ; CARE : � _�_ RESEARCH � ; FIRSTS � ��
i J �� r-....� �
I�i
� � iry of Hope, founded in 19I3, influ- �I�� esearchers working in some 200 labo- � � � ew treatments and procedures pi- i
� � erxes medicirre and xierxe through- t� �' � ratories a[ the Ciry of Hope's Beckman ;�' oneered by [he Ciry oi Hope help ',
� � ou[ the world making major corn �� �J , �. Rescarch Insutu[ehaveachieveA ma�y � .-_; patien[s in hospitals every�Niere: 1. _'
� j� tributions ro[he improvement of health care. I j medical breakthroughs. Ciry of Hope laborato- { � � Conquest of leukemla. Bone marrow .�
From all across Artrerica, vic[imz of can- �""�""f �" ries continually probe the mysteries of life ro dis- ���� �� transplantaUOru are prdorx�ing lives and �
�� cer and leukemia; heart, blood and lung dis- � -�- cover aruwers [ha[ benefit miliions [hreaterxd ( 1 xhieving cures for seven out of [en of �"'�"
��� eases, me[abolic and hereditar disorders � � b ma or diseases. I
Y i_.. Y J ... those who would have tlied withart this
j � receive the most advanced medi�al treatmenu !�� I����; Nrang ia marry convibutioru [o xierxe: �� �,~� fi(e-savirg procedure. I_�_
i�--+ in an atmosphere of warm, ioving comforc ;-'- ��� � Creauon of a ene ro make human in- ��`�� � i� �� �� I •
j 9 • New techniques fw fighting broast wr�
�_� In an unswerving purwit of inedical and , j„ � wlin, ensurin g production of unlimited �i -� °-G c a u s e t h e l e a s t w r g e ry n e c e s s a ry a n d �� �" �-
, i scientific ezcellence the Ciry of Hope, a Pilo[ i � � uantities and romivn reduced cosLS � � �
�I National Medical Cenrer, has u held iLS credo ��. ;� �- q P 9 i- -, [he most innovative radiation, chem-
, P � ,�� for diabeua everywhere. i otherapy and immunotherapy [o save �
__.� "There is no profit in curing the body i[ in the __,__ f- � �- � --f'
praeu, we destroy the soul." In this spirit of � � � • Clues to the ongins oi wch diseases as I �� Inres without loss of the breast ,
{'- �� reverence for man, Ciry of Hope forges new �"' "' ' �u schlzo renla, and e I�e �`--- �-� �
W+s• Ph P P+Y• � f • "Famiy cernered medkine" fw all, with
i weapons in [he Dattle against killer diseases: l�- � • Use of genetic research to produce the �.� -�-��- special help fo� those with hereditary dis- �--�-
� ;_ �� body's own wbstarxe to attack and de- 1 � orders such as Tourette Syndrome, �,._�.
� 5elec[ed by the Natlonal Cancer Instihrte -� ( t� Huntln ton's, and Parklnson's dls-
as one of only vx research tiospitals in the .� sVq' tumors; TNF tumor necrosis factor) ����, � � g �
+ holds great promise in the fight agairut -I���--�. --� eases. t"" '
(�� nation to veat cancer patients with the �"�_ �_�_����� � � I
Dody'sowncancerfighter�nterleukin2. �- - ! cancec �__; J �-
—
• A worid leader in [he wcceu of bone � i' • Developmentofa[estwhich°reads'"the • _� �_.-�_
'� marrow transplantation to conquer I � celPS geneuc message for hereditary dis- !`; I i .
r� leukemla. '� �"'�"`!"' eases wch as slckle cell anemla. �
i � �
• Pioncer achievements in teaching dia- �{ "t -� ��`�--'�-��-��� �._ ..
{— betic chiidren to [ruly live wi[h [heir --,- � i �
�_._ .. �. . _,
--�
,
disease. j... i.. l..., --, �._�...
�
'--' � ( i ! I �
� :._�..._ , �._... . -
�
n ! � i �..
i� - -' � i � - -; .. .1 ,.�;"�/' _._..^ Q t-•.� •
'' � i (
y . . " ' ' .�'' i . i i :1�1�
i � � i'
� � . . '_
t� � ! � t �� f �
_ _ t � � ' � , , i I ' � :
b__ . l � •• <; . �, � � .
�"'� r � iAUdd ( � �
� I ". � ., I{ � _ !'I /', �' ' i -t {i' '_: � I
�. :� • +wit � 1 ' '{iY�' �� li' �� � 1 1 i
�_ i �Ir . ; �r• �, t ' � t 1y ;...,
.. � ,' / � i i i� � � i � ' � i
' _ � 4 1 ' � � ,, ' �' � ,
�
� ,� . �^` � I �� i
i__; .►.,�. . , j i
i.._� � � - i
I _ � _i,r� i i ..; � r ;,� � � ; ��'�"� � �
� ._. � �� , I �
r _ , .,�, y . ,
__
4 � � 1 i
�_.�. .. t , t i '
I � � ' � {
I r " '_ _'}{ "'__ '_' _._ : �. � . . , '. � : ' I '_ t �.. t '� i ..� _�-- - .... .�,.......,._�-
t I . .
� I I 1 ��._�_ 5.�."`�"i"_� i .' _I._.�__i ;. : � i. � ...'_ !..__i � �_..I .� !... .� � � .� :. I ' ,_ I _± � I � l _� .
_ ' t .
� i 1 _ i. .� ..S- .�,. � . �. _�.. ... �. F'_p'
� � �
• �
��
. �.
, • � �
��,
�r,r� c,c uucoNr �'�;+°
FR�NCMiSE T�x OOipD �`''��
GI1rP�,':Cr.•�� ���i� •P"i � �
. . .. J
JulY 28� 1980
,; i3 Zn iePly teiat to
- • - 3Y4�YDH�bad?q
' P.��(.ti':� l ::�:t]
City 0i Hope� .
20E Yest Lighth Stieet
Los Angelcs. C� 9001u
PUCpose � ChacitableiScientific
Fo:= oF C[;:nica;icn ' CozF�=s'i�-
Accounting Peziod Endinq� Septembec 30
Ocqanizstaon ItumDez � 09�b790
".On t�e basis oi the in!ozmation submitted and piovided yous p[esent
ope=�taons con[inue unchan5ed oz conioLm to those pcoposed in youz
appiication. you aze e�emp: fsom scate fzanchise oc inco�e iax undez
Section 23701d. P.evenue and iaxation Code. Any change in opecation.
chazactez oc pucpose of tiie otgani��tion sust be sepozted iR�ediately
� to thls office so that ue may detcrmin• the affect on youz eKempt
st�tuz. 11ny change ot name os addcess also must b• seporSed.
Tou ace [equized to file Fozm 199 (Exempt Ozganitation Annual
Znfozmation P.etutn) or Fozm 199B (°_xempt Ozqani=ation ►nnual
Inioxmation Statementl on oz Eeloxe the 15�h day of the Sth month (�
7/2 eonths) a:teL the close of youz accounting peciod. See annual
instructions�uiih tozms ioz scquizements.
You aze noz ic?uized to file state fzanchise oz ineome tax t�tuzns
unless you have income suD7ect to tlie untelated business income !ax
undec Section 23731 of the Code. Zn this event. you aze zequiced to
:ile Fotm 109 (Exemo; Ozganization Business Income Ta� 8etuin) by tl�e
15th day oi tre 3zd month (2 1�2 monthz> a:tez the close of yous
annual accounsinq Desiod.
Z: the ozga�:=ation is incozpocating, this appzoval uill eKpize unless
:ncozpotailon is coTpleted vith Lhe SecLetarY of State uitAin 60 days.
irempt:on _'io� _edezal 1�1COR.? ox otliez tawes and �Othez ztate taxes `
:eqtiizes sepasa:e apollcations.
This eKenptron e.jecti�e as ot Januazy 1.'�980•
4�
. . ' ' •
oobest Lute. �.:�a?e�
Exer+pt Ccqani_ation Section
Telapl�one (S00) 852-5' �
- �
ec� Riehrz�d 1 ^--�,n '
I
i
� . �
� - -
- . - .
o.e,: �R Y ��,5 �+.� ro c«.,� -+:
;
�. OeLaCrur(F7) j,
. . tonua Tsle>`,.;�r M�Inar �.
._ � . �(I]3) �86-i553 '
�
Yt7 e•' YeVe _ . �
DE Li�t •cL ftc�et � ' �
os ,1.ajelec. t�, �OD1C
ez- ESrR'.adL: •
'�k�e� ez tb� Sn!or�etioc �oc r�c��t1.7 •uL.-itteG, �e Lev• tinsS:fS�! �eur
erFrs:s�t'SO= es oae t.6et is eet e prSdetr tou:etic� �ltf,ia tt• e,��:pF e! ieetie:. ��
E�S (t) e! tLe Int�rat: I�eve�e CcGc Leca•:st so� tre <<r��:se:ic= l�cetlD�C SL ;
ieriie: 77D(b)(1)([)(vi) �nL SD9(�)(1).
?e::r �:e7i stetus caGer s�eifoa 6D1(eJ (S) �t tL: Cot• !s �til_ So �•tert. �
S!:s tieas:'Seetfo: !s Eese: oa the �ssu:�tfo� tLei �c�r ��ert:lens �:11 , i
reT:l�e ts yo� Leve tutet. I! s�u- scurc�s ot sL;�cri,•er �c�- y_ryotes.
::e-s::e-, er ortLo_ e! e��re:se= eL��e, �l�esr le: rs 7c_,o� sc �t er� ec_s:Cr- t�e
t!1ltl C.' LbE tLL�6! OL �C:.^ �it��l iLtlL'S l=.: tOUL:EUG� filLLS.
1=:s s�persr�ea e_r leiter tete: Janusry 2D, lSi�.
Eereas� L`.:a letter eonl[ Le:;, reselv� t_}• �ur5tic�5 lDc.t yoi loiGetie_
it:zs. �e. t`.e :C kse; St Sz Tcce pe:.�ae�: treorGa.
2' !:c teve �-• eur�:Senc, s:ee�r oe:.:t:: t'e pe-t:e s�c.e aLe t:= te::�`_:_:
-.:=�t: ere t: or_ �bov�. .
' £:acere:T tccrs,
� r � / //
_ ,
D:c:::c: L:rectc-
•
I � '
1 F � EC ���L'L,
I �.�'' J : `
j �w✓ �,.., -
• r..
�
�
�L.'b:� 7?5^, la /. R'r.� Lr:i.: 1C't;'�; (t-..[—=:
I I
1
(
1
�
�
�
�
�
J � •
CITY OF HOPE AFFILIATES FINANCIAL HIGALIGHTS
FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1987
(000's Omitted)
General revenue from all sources:
Net patient service revenue $ 56 257
Auxiliaries 16 lzo
Research grants 8 566
Bequests 10 590
Organizations and foundations 5 939
Individuals 4 977
Appeals and campaiqns 6�
Other income l0 1��
Total revenue llz 591
Expenses of all activities:
Operating expenses before depreciation s8 06;
Fundraising 3 �a3
General and administrative and other expenses 3 023
Social services, public information and �
health education 1 5�3
Total operating expenses 96 223
Depreciation 5 258
Total expenses lol 521
Excess of revenues over expenses (allocated to
capital projects and board-designated funds) 5 11 1%0
Restricted revenue (not included above) S 5
Assets - Current General:
Cash 5 6 96a
Receivable from affiliated organizations 1 7a1
Receivable from third party payors of
medical insurance l0 792
Inventory, prepaid expenses and other
8S50ts 2 146
Research grants and other receivables 1 036
Total current assets �2 6'3
Assets - Other General:
Marketable securities 1 112
Notes receivable secured by deeds of trust 9�a
Other 11 063
Total other assets 13 133
Receivables under third party payor contracts 1 952
Property and equipment, net of accumulated
depreciation 50 346
Limited use funds froID bond issue for
renovation and equipment, held by Trustee 3 58a
Restricted endowment funds (principal to be � la 716
held in perpetuity)
Reatricted deferred qffta 7 479
Total asaets Sil� 893_
Liabilities - Current: g 7 934
Accounts payable 700
Notes payable to banks F �� 1
. Accrued salaries and va�atien pay
Current maturities of lonq-term debt and
obligations under capital leases 2 316
Payables under third party payor contracts 3 38u
Total current liabilities 20 091
Liabilities - other:
Lonq-term debt and obligations under capital 26 g29
leases, less curzent maturities 7 a79
Defezred qifts
Total other liabilitias 34 3oa
Total liabilities $ 54 399
Fund balances 5 59 494