HomeMy Public PortalAboutMinutes - 1970/01/13 - Regular1110 INITIATION
1. The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of
Temple City was called to order by Chairman Lawson at 7:30 P. M. ,
January 13, 1970.
2. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Chairman Lawson.
3. ROLL CALL:
Present: Commissioners: Atkins, Beckman, Dennis, Garvin, Lawson.
Absent: Commissioners: None
Also Present: City Manager Koski, Asst. City Attorney Neher,
Planning Director Dragicevich, and Planning Technician Burnham
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Regular Meeting of December 23, 1969:
There being no additions or corrections, Commissioner Atkins moved,
and Commissioner Beckman seconded, that the minutes be approved as
presented. The motion passed unanimously.
1
1
•
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
January 13, 1970
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 69 -365PC
Relating to Zone Variance Case 69 -303
Asst. City Attorney Neher read title to subject resolution. There
being no additions or corrections, Commissioner Garvin moved to
waive further reading and adopt. Commissioner Dennis seconded and
the motion passed unanimously.
6. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE 69 -304
Mobil Oil Corporation, Owner- Applicant
11001 Valley Mall, El Monte, Calif.
Site: 5676 N. Rosemead Boulevard and
9014 Las Tunas Drive, Temple City
The Planning; Director informed the Commissioners that the .applicant
had submitted a new plot plan for the proposed development just be-
fore the meeting, to be referred to as .'2nd Revised Exhibit "A "'
The style of building, and location of Tube areas (east side of build-
ing), ing), and the distance from the alley, with is in accordance with City
standards, were the only differences between this plan and the previous
one.
There being no questions from the Commissioners, the public hearing
was declared open.
Mr. Ray Duty, representing the applicant, said the company would be
happy to work out any differences and work with the City. In answer
to questions from the Commission he stated the roof was aluminum
shake shingles colored to resemble wood; the structure was metal
covered with brick.
Commissioner Garvin referred to the "mushroom- type" lighting being
installed in a Mobil Station presently being built in another area.
Mr. Joseph Williams, engineer for Mobil, said he was familiar with
it, but the concensus of opinion was that this type of lighting, while
attractive, was not practical. He went on to say the price sigh at the
proposed site ;would be tin, and movable.
There being no further questions Commissioner Garvin moved to close
public hearing; Commissioner Beckman seconded, and the motion passed.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
January 13, 1970 PAGE TWO
1111In Commission discussion the Commissioners were in.agreernent with the new
presentation and .had no objections. Commissioner Atkins moved to grant
Conditional Use Permit 69 -304 with staff conditions. Commissioner Beck-
man seconded,.and the motion carried unanimously.
Asst. City Attorney read title to Resolution:70- 366PC, A RESOLUTION OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY GRANTING A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT IN CASE NO. 69 -304. Commissioner Beckman moved to waive fur -
ther reading and adopt; Commissioner Atkins seconded, and the motion
passed unanimously.
Commissioner Garvin expressed his appreciation to Mobil Oil for working
with the City and presenting an acceptable and pleasing plot plan.
Chairman Lawson announced that Items 7 and 8" on the Agenda would be con -
sidered.simultaneously.
7. PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 69 -305
ZONE VARIANCE CASE 69 -306
8.
1
•
1
•
1
•
Meeker Land Company, Owner
132 Live Oak, .Arcadia, Calif.
Curtis E. Spradley, President
Tastee Products .of Calif. #1, Inc., Applicant
1100.1 S. Cypress Street„ La La Habra, Calif.
Site: 4805 N. Temple City Boulevard, Temple City
The Planning Director gave the factual report, stating the request
for a Conditional Use. Permit was to allow the applicant to build a
new structure, establish and operate a drive -in restaurant in a
C -2, General Commercial zone. He explained the plot plan. marked
Exhibit "A ", showing proposed development, and gave the factual
data on the subject 'property, listing the .staff proposals which
are on file in the Planning Dept.
The request for a zone variance was to allow the applicant to install
a roof sign on the proposed drive -in restaurant which would contain
more square footage than allowable by the City Sign Ordinance. The
proposed roof sign would have 135 sq. ft, per side, and only 65 sq.
ft. is permitted. He concluded by saying that the applicant is re-
quired to have 10 parking stalls, but that parking was not a problem
in this case as there was a large .parking .area. The parking area
was to be resurfaced and striped.
The public hearing was declared open.
Mr. Curtis Spradley, representing the applicant, stated the rendering
of the unit with the sign is exactly as proposed. There will be no
other signs exposed or on the surface of that building. This is the
standard sign used throughout the area. The present Tastee Freez
building has been at that location since 1952, and the company wants
to upgrade the building. It will be under new management. In answer
to the Commissioners' questions he said the parking area for this
activity will be resurfaced and striped and meet the City requirements;
the roof is aluminum shake, painted orange, which is a company trade-
mark. The company has upgraded all but 9 of 106 locations in the Los
Angeles area, and has installed the same size sign or larger. This is
a franchised operation, but the parent company exercises some control
over the franchisee as to the operation of the business, as to appear -
ance and situations that arise on the property, control of business
hours. The parent company in La Habra has 32 people who check each
operation by calling on it every ,7 to 10 days. Hours of operation are
normally 10 P.M. in the winter months and 11 P.M. in the summer. months.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
January 13, 1970 PAGE THREE
•Mr. Clayton Taylor, 9561 Lower Azusa Road, said he was in favor of this
use of the subject property, and pleased to hear the company exercised
control over the franchisee as to the operation of the business,.es-
pecially its appearance, as he lives near the operation, and in the past
has suffered from trash and litter from it. He said this is a new owner
and very cooperative.
There being no further testimony, Commissioner Garvin moved to close the
public hearing. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Beckman and passed
unanimously.
Commissioner Beckman began the closed discussion by saying he had no ob-
jection to the Conditional Use Permit; the business had been at that
location a longtime, and this proposal would upgrade the property; how-
ever, he saw no justification; for the zone variance. Other applicants
are required to comply with the Sign Ordinance, and so should this
applicant.
Commissioner Atkins agreed that a drive -in restaurant is good on this
corner. He felt the size of the sign was superfluous, especially in a
residential area; that the building itself is a trademark.
Sommissioner Dennis agreed, adding that the sign request does not meet the
riteria for granting a variance.
Commissioner Garvin concurred; the proposal for. the Conditional Use Permit
meets the conditions for granting, but felt the building advertises the
business, and was against the zone variance to increase the size of the
sign above that allowable under the Sign Ordinance.
Chairman .Lawson concurred with what had been said.
IIICommissioner Garvin moved to grant Conditional Use Permit 69 -305 with staff
proposals, as it meets the conditions for granting ,a Conditional Use Permit.
Commissioner Atkins seconded, and the motion passed unanimously.
Asst. City Attorney Neher read title to Resolution 70- 367PC, A RESOLUTION
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT IN CASE 69 -305. Commissioner Garvin moved to waive further
reading and adopt. Commissioner Beckman seconded and the motion passed
unanimously.
0 ommissioner Beckman moved to deny Zone Variance 69 -306 as it does not meet
ny of the conditions for granting.a variance. Commissioner Garvin seconded,
nd the motion carried unanimously.
Asst. City Attorney Neher read title to Resolution 70- 368PC, A RESOLUTION
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DENYING ZONE VARIANCE
IN CASE 69 -306. Commissioner Atkins moved to waive further reading and
adopt; Commissioner Garvin seconded, and the motion passed unanimously.
9. PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT 69-307
Velma D. Riggle, Owner
6759 N. Golden West Ave.
Box 1093, Arcadia, Calif.
Jim Dandy Fast Foods, Inc., Applicant
10887 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 735
Los Angeles, Calif.
Site: 9803 E. Las Tunas Drive, Temple City
(Northeast corner Las Tunas Drive
and Golden West Avenue)
The Planning, Director gave the factual report, stating that the appli-
cant proposes to ,build and operate a drive -in .restaurant in a C-2 zone.
•
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
January 13, 1970 PAGE FOUR
He explained the plot plan marked Exhibit "A" which shows existing and
proposed development, and gave the - factual data on the subject property,
listed the staff proposals which are on file in the Planning Dept. The
Planning. Director added that the staff suggested that the building be
relocated to the southwest corner, which would improve the appearance
of the proposal, and traffic circulation would be more efficient. He
felt the driveway approaches are too close to the intersection for
IIIefficient circulation with the present plan.
There being . no ,questions the public hearing was declared open.
Mr. Morris Finley, 8439 Ravendale, . San Gabriel, spoke for the applicant,
stating the present design is the result of consultations with his client
and the City staff. The client has other designs, some of which are
strictly for take -out operations. This design has one take -out window,
and 8 tables which will seat 32 people for indoor dining. The operators
of this food chain are experts in their field, and they feel the location
of the building is best for their operation as they must have circulation
around the building. This is a.subsid.ized, but not a franchised, opera-
tion. The property will be sold, the owner puts in his own people and
they operate it themselves. This proposal being offered is a vast im-
provement over what is presently there, which is a blight on the appear -
nce of the City. The building is of 3" steel columns with fixed glass and
ome opaque panels. This is the largest size plan. In answer to questions
from the Commission he stated that the mechanical equipment will all be on
the roof and screened behind the central section of the roof behind the
overhang. He was not sure if this would conceal the mechanical: equipment
but was willing to take this as one of the conditions, that mechanical
equipment be behind extended .roof line. There was only, one take -out
window, and it would not be glass enclosed.
Mrs, Doris E. Dyl, 441 W. Leadora Ave.,. Glendora, who owns apartments
directly to the north of the subj ect jproperty, said she hoped for a 10 P.M.
closing as her tenants are retired, elderly people who do not stay up late.
She was concerned about automobile noises. Chairman Lawson ,pointed out
that her property is located in a C -2 zone, not residential.
Mrs. Lawrence Giovanetti, 5838 Golden .West Ave., spoke against the Condi-
tional Use Permit because of the traffic and noise. They had bought a
home in Temple City just 1 -1/2 years ago, and did not want another in-and-
out business in their vicinity.
0 Mr. Lawrence Giovanetti, 5838 Golden West Ave., spoke against the Condition-
] Use Permit, saying that there is trash thrown into the Temple City Park
ow, and rats, and this use will increase both nuisances.
Mr. Joseph Benesch, 5842 Golden West Avenue, concurred with M. Giovanetti,
adding the City shouldn't "drown out" the residents with drive -in businesses.
Mr, S. A. Macallister, 5926 Golden West Ave., felt the proposed use would
add to the congestion on Golden West Ave. The frying of chicken would
give off .a greasy smell; the wind is generally from a direction that the
exhaust would head towards his apartments. He, too, objected to the clos-
ing hour because his tenants are retired people.
Mrs. Doris Dyl, 44.1 W. Leadora Ave., Glendora, resumed the podium, saying she
IIIwas quite concerned about the proposed business, particularly in regards to
cleanliness, and her tenants were concerned also, and had asked her to speak
tonight.
In rebuttal, Mr. Finley stated the Health Dept. supervised the handling of
trash very rigidly; there are grease traps and filters in the ceiling, grease
traps in the sinks and floor drains. He hopes the proposed use will have
lots of business, and feels that Golden West and Las Tunas are capable of
.handling the additional traffic. This is not a teenage operation, but
chicken dinners to be eaten .. by families, not a meeting ,place for young folks,
He stated he had no other rendering to offer, although he had .asked for
others.
1
•
1
•
1
•
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
January 13, 1970 PAGE FIVE
Commissioner Garvin stated he would like to see renderings with more
detail, and moved to continue the case to the next meeting, as an open
public hearing, to allow the applicant to present better renderings.
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Beckman and passed unanimously.
Chairman Lawson declared a five- minute recess at 9:00 P.M.
The meeting was called to :order again at 9:05 P.M. by Chairman Lawson.
10. PUBLIC HEARING: DETERMINATION OF THE EXISTENCE
OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE
Francis E. Bi l l i e- Owner
4935 "Doreen .Avenue, Temple City
The Planning Director announced that notices were'postedas required
by law. He then gave a, history of this case. He continued, stating
that a report had been received from the Los Angeles County Health
Dept. on January 13, 1970, stating an inspection had been made by
one of their officials which reported no violation of any existing
health legislation. The second letter he had received was from the
Los Angeles Fire Dept., dated January 12, 1970, which listed the
violations of the Fire Code, which :should .be corrected. In addition
to the official correspondence, the Planning Director said the staff
received three letters from various individuals and organizations
who are in favor of Mr. B,i 1 1 i e ' s Bird Farm, a 1 1 of which are on
file in the Planning Dept. In conclusion he read the conditions
from the Resolution t hich!.the `Planning Commission. passed at their
regular meeting of December 23,_1969, when they decided to hold
public hearing on this matter, and said these conditions and the
methods of abatement may be changed or added to, as the Commission
sees fit.
There being no questions from the Commissioners, the public hearing
was declared open.
Mr. Francis Billie, 4935 Doreen, stated he had lived on the property
for 15 years, and always had birds, even before moving to Temple City.
He bought this property in Temple City because at that time it was
zoned agricultural. Most of his cages are 8 ft. high, with concrete
foundations, and a dew -drop waterfeeder. The Building Inspector felt
he should have a check valve in this operation and he has no objection.
Because he often comes home from .work late and it is dark when he
feeds his birds, he has a "sunset" lighting system which slowly dims,
taking two hours to do so, so the birds are not suddenly plunged
into darkness after they are fed. However, he is not working such
long hours, and does not need this system anymore, so will not have
to put the electrical wire for it in conduit. He said he has dicidu-
ous trees and therefore it is natural he should have leaves. He does
have a rodent problem. The Los Angeles County Health Dept, has sup-
plied him with considerable amounts of poisons in the past and presently
to try to control them. However, the poison only keeps them down,
does not get rid of them. When he rebuilds his cages he will use 1/2"
Welded wire which will keep out the larger rodents, but the small ones
still get in. He feeds his birds in the morning, because if he fed
them at night the rodents would get the food. He has 87 birds on his
property, and this is not the largest collection of birds in Temple
City. The birds vary in size from a flamingo or crane (40" in height),
to birds 1 -1/2" in size. In his area his cages would have to be
better than the City's specifications. The 1" wide wire required by
the City would not keep the rodents out. He agreed to comply with
all the items on the checklist, but he would require time to do so.
He assumed he had a year to do this.
1
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
January 13, 1970 PAGE SIX
Armand Arabian, Attorney at Law, acting as counsel for Mr. Billie, stated
he had reviewed the documents available to him on this case and raised
the question whether this was a public or private nuisance, or whether
it might be just a violation of the Health Code. He described a public
nuisance as one that affected a.large area and /or a large number of
people, whereas a private nuisance would affect a small, neighborhood
area and /or a small number of people, The County Health Dept, report
states there is no violation of any health legislation. Mr. Billie
has lived at this location for 15 years, pursuing his hobby all that
time, and if the complainants objecting to this use moved into the
neighborhood after he did, they should have been aware, to some degree,
of the type of property they were moving next to, and if his use is
the oldest, his use comes first. If there is one, or two, agrieved
persons, that does not constitute a public nuisance in the legal defini-
tion of the word. He concluded by saying that Mr. Billie, according to
the letters received from the Los Angeles 'Zoo, and ornithology organiza-
tions, is an acknowledged expert in his field, and is a unique individual
in this world of conformity. The inquiry here is whether, in fact, this
is a public nuisance.
Asst. City Attorney Neher replied that Mr. Arabian had referred to a
State Ordinance in his testimony, but the State law is not applicable
to this hearing. The nuisance being heard was within the City ordinance.
11011r. Mike Marshall, 5104 Doreen, asked how many individuals had complained
about subject property, and the Planning Director informed him basically
there was one complainant. Mr. Marshall spoke in Mr. Bi l l i e's behalf and
felt this was a matter to be resolved between the neighbors; otherwise
any individual could lodge a public nuisance complaint against another.
Chairman Lawson explained that the City . is obligated to investigate all
complaints, and if the complaint is justified, it is the duty of the City
IIIto initiate action to correct conditions if such conditions exist. Asst.
City Attorney Neher explained further it is not necessary that a complaint
be filed; if the staff observes a condition that should be rectified, this
can institute corrective action. Mr. Marshall felt this was wrong, and
was informed he could discuss this at a City Council meeting if he so de-
sired,
Mrs. Elsie Juenemann, 4941 Doreen, addressed the Commission, saying that
several Councilmen, the City Manager and City Attorney had all investigat-
ed the subject property and agreed it was a mess. She stated she could
not sell her house because of the condition of Mr. Billie's property, the
me11, flies, and appearance. She did not know how far her residence is
rom the aviaries, and she admitted she had never actually •put her house
p for sale, but under present conditions she feels it would not sell.
She admitted to having one pet, a cat, which is no longer with her.
Mr. John J. Burnengo, 9425 Pentland, stated when he first moved into this
area it was agricultural, but now it is overrun with rats. The aviaries
are unpainted _and termite infested, the stench from them makes it imposs-
ible for anybody to eat in his backyard. He concluded he was in
complete sympathy with Mrs. Juenemann.
Mr. Boyce O'Bannon confirmed Mrs. Juenemann's testimony. A four -year
abatement period ending last May should apply to Mr. Billie also. He
referred to Mr. Billie 's testimony before the City Council that he was
IIIable to charge off $2,000 on his income tax, which makes his hobby a
business, otherwise he would not be able to .deduct his losses. He felt
Mr. Billie is to be commended for being an expert in his field, but that
this use should be in an agricultural zone rather than a residential
zone.
•
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
January 13, 1970 PAGE SEVEN
Mr, Billie, in rebuttal, explained that when he loses a -bird he donates
�n
i
it to the Los Angeles County Museum for study or for display: purposes.
ften these are rare birds, worth $100 to $300. He reiterated he is
not in business.
Mr. Mike Marshall resumed the podium and said he felt that Mr. Billie had
one year, within the law, to comply with the standards for aviaries, and
he should be granted this time.
IIIMr. Bernard Woltermann, 5103 N. Doreen Avenue, admitted the subject property
needed cleaning .up, .but did not feel it was a public nuisance, and the
complaints against Mr. Billie were instigated by only one person.
Mrs. Louise Milicic, 9095 Olive, asked when the ordinance limiting the
number of pets became effective. She was told the date, and that all
City ordinances are published in the Temple City Times.
There being no one else to speak regarding this hearing, Commissioner
Atkins moved to close the public hearing, Commissioner Beckman seconded,
and the motion carried.
Commissioner Garvin opened the closed discussion by questioning whether
this actually was.a.public nuisance. The Health Dept. had investigated
he property and found no� violations; rats exist in the best and clean -
t neighborhoods; aesthetics are not for the Planning Commission to
etermine. He felt the Fire Dept, recommendations should be enforced,
and all Building and Safety Code violations corrected as far as electrical
and plumbing is concerned. Mr. Billie should be required to .bring his
aviaries up to the City standards set for the housing of birds. If Mr.
Billie is sincere he will do all thes,things, and apply to the City for
a permit to pursue his hobby. Inspections by the staff should be every
two months to see that he is progressing. If he has not made any effort
to cooperate then further steps will have to be taken.
Commissioner Dennis asked if the violations of the Building and Safety
ode would have to be corrected irrespective of the property nuisance case,
and was informed they would. Considering: the Health Dept, report, and the
fact that the other violations would be corrected anyway, he could not see
that a public nuisance, as such, exists.
Commissioner Atkins said he didn't think we have shown this is .a public
nuisance. There are conditions that need rectifying.
ommissioner Beckman concurred that this didn't seem to qualify as a
blic nuisance. He felt Mr. Billie should be granted the same amount of
me as anyone else to meet the staff requirements, to clean up the prop-
erty, comply with Building and Safety code, and get rid of the fire hazard.
Chairman Lawson said from testimony, pictures, and visit to,the site, 1)
there is possibility of fire hazard, that the leaves and debris should be
cleaned up; the wiring which is in violation should be corrected; 2) main-
tenance of property to encourage rodents,- the Health Dept. has eliminated
this item as contributing to a public nuisance; 3) when the Building and
Safety Code and City standards violations are corrected the accessory
structures housing birds should have adequate plumbing devices; and 4) when
the property is cleaned up and Mr. Billie complies with the new Pet Ordi-
nance under the abatement method this item on the resolution will be resolved.
Commissioner Garvin moved that Items 1, 3 and 4 of Planning Commission
esolution 69 -364PC do exist. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Atkins
nd passed unanimously.
After considerable discussion among the Commissioners about the time to be
allowed for abatement, Commissioner Beckman moved that the methods of.abate-
ment as recommended by the staff be fulfilled within 60 days, with a staff
investigation and report within .30 days, said methods to be Nos. 1, 3, 4
1111 nd 5 of Planning Commission Resolution 69- 364PC. Commissioner Atkins
econded, and a roll call vote was taken. Commissioners Atkins, Beckman,
Garvin and Lawson voted in favor, and Commissioner Dennis in opposition.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
January 13, 1970 PAGE EIGHT
411/Asst. City Attorney Neher read - Resolution 70-369PC, A RESOLUTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION QF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE
OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND RECOMMENDING ABATEMENT THEREOF. Commissioner
Garvin moved to waive further reading and adopt; motion was seconded by
Commissioner Atkins and passed unanimously.
11.
•
1
PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION
RE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 28538
5010 Farago Avenue, Temple City
The Planning Director stated that this development meets all require-
ments of planning and zoning, being zoned R -3. Currently the lot
consists of two parcels which will be consolidated into one, and 15
units are to be built on it. He referred them to the Los Angeles
Regional Planning Commission Subdivision Committee's report which
covered requirements of public works improvements, drainage,
utilities,, road improvements, and referred to Item 13 of the report
which did not apply -in.this case.
Mr. Lewis Webb, Jr., President of Euclid Land and Construction Co.,
took the podium, gave .to,the .Commission .the findings of a survey
made on condominiums, and the type of people who buy into them. He
referred to various,condominiums in the area as examples. In answer
to questions from the Commission he stated that there is•an, owners'
association, which is a non- profit California corporation with no
stocks involved, which collects a monthly maintenance fee from
owners in the condominium, and this association has the right to put
a lien on the property for nonpayment of the fee, or to foreclose,
if it should be necessary to do so. The association has a sinking
fund to provide for future .repairs and replacement of all exterior
materials, which would include such items as a new. roof.
Commissioner Beckman moved to recommend to the City Council that Tent.
Tract 28538 be approved subject to. staff . recommendations and Subdivi-
sion Committee report. Commissioner Atkins seconded and the motion
passed unanimously.
12. COMMUNICATIONS
•
1
•
The Planning Director referred. to a request.by Mr. LeRoy B. Miller
of Miller Bros. Floats to rezone the one piece of.R- 1.property to
M -1. The other. two parcels were rezoned to M -2 in March, 1969. He
requested public hearing on this item be set for February.24, 1970.
The Commission agreed to this.
The Planning;Director informed the Commission. that the City Council,
at their regular meeting of Tuesday, January 6, 1970, reviewed and
approved the Planning Commission. recommendations re Tentative Tract
Map 30308, with conditions.as outlined by. the Subdivision Committee.
Planning D.i.rector Dragicevich referred to notice received from the
Building Industry Association of California regarding; Planned Unit
Development. This item.will be considered in.conjunct; ion with the
General Plan.
The Planning Director announced that the San Gabriel Planning Forum
invites the Commission . to a talk and discussion on January 14, 1970,
in Rosemead, on Conditional Use Permits.
Finally, he reported that a letter had been sent by the staff to
Harbor Oil Co. concerning their property at Oak and Las Tunas, asking
them to maintain the property, in good order and suggesting they, put
up post and chain and .proper wording to discourage use as .a parking
lot,
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
January 13, 1970
PAGE NINE
41113. TIME FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO SPEAK - There was no one.
1 14. MATTERS FROM CITY OFFICIALS - Ther e were non . . e
15. ADJOURNMENT
There bei.ng., no further business, Commissioner peQI< man, at 1 1 :30 P. M. ,
moved that the meeting be adjourned to the next regular meeting of
the Planning Commission on January 27, 1970, in the Council Chambers
of the City Hall. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Garvin and
passed unanimously.
1
Attest:
Ac-"fi
•
1
•
1
•
aiu'71wt --
Chairhan'