HomeMy Public PortalAboutMinutes - 1971/10/12 - Regular"
P L A N N I N G C O M M I S S I O N M I N U T E S
O c t o b e r 1 2 , 1 9 7 1
I N I T I A T I O N
1 . T h e r e g u l a r m e e t i n g o f t h e P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n o f t h e C i t y o f
T e m p l e C i t y w a s c a l l e d t o o r d e r b y C h a i r m a n D e n n i s a t 7 : 3 0 p . m . ,
O c t o b e r 1 2 , 1 9 7 1 , i n t h e C o u n c i 1 C h a m b e r s .
2 . T h e P l e d g e o f A l l e g i a n c e t o t h e F l a g w a s l e d b y C h a i r m a n D e n n i s .
3 . R O L L C A L L :
P r e s e n t : C o m m i s s i o n e r s A t k i n s , G a r v i n , L a w s o n , S t a r t i n , D e n n i s
A b s e n t : C o m m i s s i o n e r s . N o n e
A l s o P r e s e n t : C i t y M a n a g e r K o s k i , A s s t . C i t y A t t o r n e y W h i t e a n d
P l a n n i n g . D i r e c t o r D r a g i c e v i c h
4 . A P P R O V A L O F M I N U T E S - S e p t e m b e r 1 4 , 1 9 7 1 :
C o m m i s s i o n e r A t k i n s c o r r e c t e d p a r a . 8 , p . 4 , w h i c h s h o u l d n o t
i n c l u d e " H e w a s c o n c e r n e d a b o u t t h e s e v e r a l e s c r o w s i n j e o p a r d y "
a s t h i s w a s n o t t h e c a s e .
C h a i r m a n D e n n i s c a l l e d a t t e n t i o n t o t h e r o l l c a l l v o t e o n h i s
m o t i o n t o r e o p e n p u b l i c h e a r i n g a n d c o n t i n u e t h e c a s e ( p a r a . 1 2 ,
p . 4 ) . M i n u t e s s h o u l d r e v e r s e t h o s e f o r a n d a g a i n s t a s p r i n t e d ,
C o m m i s s i o n e r A t k i n s m o v e d t o a d o p t t h e m i n u t e s o f . S e p t e m b e r 1 4 ,
1 9 7 1 , a s c o r r e c t e d . M o t i o n w a s s e c o n d e d b y C o m m i s s i o n e r G a r v i n ,
a n d a r o l l c a l l v o t e w a s t a k e n :
A Y E S : C o m m i s s i o n e r s - A t k i n s , G a r v i n , S t a r t i n , D e n n i s
N O E S : C o m m i s s i o n e r s - N o n e
A B S T A I N I N G : C o m m i s s i o n e r s L a w s o n
5 . P U B L I C H E A R I N G : M O D I F I C A T I O N O F Z O N E V A R I A N C E C A S E 6 7 - 2 0 7
1 0 6 5 1 - 5 7 - 6 1 E a s t O l i v e S t r e e t , T e m p l e C i t y
T h e P l a n n i n g : D i r e c t o r i n f o r m e d t h e C o m m i s s i o n t h a t a p p l i c a n t i s
r e q u e s t i n g a m o d i f i c a t i o n o f a c o n d i t i o n i m p o s e d i n R e s o l u t i o n
6 7 - 2 3 8 P C r e g a r d i n g a n a b a t e m e n t p e r i o d e x p i r i n g o n J u n e 3 0 , 1 9 7 4 .
A p p l i c a n t r e q u e s t s t h i s p e r i o d b e e x t e n d e d t o J u n e 3 0 , 1 9 8 4 , o r
t e n a d d i t i o n a l y e a r s . R e a s o n f o r t h e r e q u e s t i s t h a t t h e p r e s e n t
t e n a n t i s v a c a t i n g t h e p r e m i s e s t h e e n d o f t h i s y e a r , a n d i t i s
d i f f i c u l t t o o b t a i n a t e n a n t i n a c o m m e r c i a l l o c a t i o n w h e n t h e
p r e m i s e s w i l l h a v e t o b e v a c a t e d i n a c o u p l e y e a r s .
H e r e f e r r e d t o t h r e e l e t t e r s r e c e i v e d i n r e f e r e n c e t o t h e a p p l i c a -
t i o n - t w o i n f a v o r a n d o n e o p p o s e d , w h i c h w e r e r e c e i v e d a n d f i l e d .
T h e p u b l i c h e a r i n g w a s d e c l a r e d o p e n .
M r . P e t e r S . W a r d m a n , B o x 2 2 9 , E l M o n t e , i n b e h a l f o f t h e o w n e r s ,
g a v e t h e h i s t o r y o f t h e p r o p e r t y a n d o f t h e u s e s o n i t . H e s t a t e d
t h e o w n e r h a d i n v e s t e d $ 7 , 0 0 0 i n i m p r o v e m e n t s a n d h a d r e q u e s t e d
t h e o r i g i n a l v a r i a n c e t o c o n t i n u e o p e r a t i n g a t l e a s t l o n g e n o u g h t o .
a m o r t i z e t h e i m p r o v e m e n t s . H e c o n t i n u e d t h a t t h e r e i s a n e e d f o r
t h i s t y p e o f m a r k e t , t h a t n e i g h b o r h o o d m a r k e t s h a v e a p l a c e i n t h e
c o m m u n i t y . M r . W a r d m a n p r e s e n t e d a p e t i t i o n , w i t h o v e r t h r e e h u n -
d r e d s i g n a t u r e s , u r g i n g t h e e x t e n s i o n o f t i m e b e g r a n t e d . T h e
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
October 12, 1971 Page two.
•
1
•
attempt to get a new lessee for the market is being handled by a
realty company, and the realtor has had difficulty interesting
prospective tenants because of the abatement period of the
property. He was of the opinion that an extension of ten years,
or until 1984, would be sufficient time to amortize the improvements.
Mr. Bi l ly L. Bell, 18639 E. Covina Boulevard, Covina, stated he
bought the subject property to provide income when he retires and
would like to keep it operating as long as he can. If he is
granted the modification, and at the time of expiration in 1984,
he would probably ask for another extension of time.
Mr. Roy Whetstone, 5404 El Monte Avenue, said the store was well -
maintained and clean and was in favor of the application.
Mr. John Whittaker, 10641 E. Olive, stressed the convenience of
the market and its cleanliness.
Mrs. Ruth Lissone, 10650 E. Olive, spoke in opposition, said the
area was zoned residential, and the subject use is nonconforming;
the use depreciates her property, causing a turn-over of. tenants.
The use should be abated as originally stipulated.
Mrs. Rosa Remmers, 5428 El Monte Avenue, stated she could get more
for her property if the market were not there (her property is not
for sale, however); she spoke against the trash and litter problem
which she attributes to the market being located near her.
Mr. Wardman, in rebuttal, said the store was in existence prior to
Mrs. Lissone's property; that he, too, has a trash and litter prob-
lem on his personal property;wh.ich. Ts not located near any stores.
It doesn't matter where the store is located,_ it is where children
drop wrappers.
Mr. Bell, in answer to Commissioners' questions, said it is pro-
posed the new store tenant would handle groceries, produce, meats,
beer, wine (no hard liquor), minor clothing items. If present
tenant would stay for the remaining 2i years of the present abate-
ment period, at the end of that time Mr. Bell said he would ask
for extension of abatement.
Commissioner Garvin moved to close public hearing, seconded by
-Commissioner Startin and carried.
Commissioner Lawson, who had viewed the property and read past
history, said he sympathized with those who enjoyed the convenience
of the store, but .a as a planner he felt the 1967 decision should be
enforced.
Commissioner Atkins was in agreement, adding the only reason appli-
cant was asking for extension was an economic one, which is not a
valid one for granting modification.
Commissioner Startin was of the opinion that applicant, who had in-
vested several thousand dollars improving his property, had not had
a chance to amortize his improvements, that the market was attractive
and clean. He noticed, on the petition, the number of signatures ob-
tained in a short period, and concluded the market is doing a good
business, well established, and he was in favor of granting.
Commissioner Garvin noted that some of the addresses on the petition
were from areas outside Temple City, and those signers would not be
"
P L A N N I N G C O M M I S S I O N M I N U T E S
O c t o b e r 1 2 , 1 9 7 1 P A G E T H R E E
m a t e r i a l l y c o n c e r n e d w i t h t h e e f f e c t o f t h e m o d i f i c a t i o n . H e w a s
o n t h e C o m m i s s i o n a t t h e t i m e o f t h e o r i g i n a l h e a r i n g a n d w a s
a g a i n s t e x t e n d i n g t h e u s e b e y o n d t h e 1 9 7 4 d a t e i m p o s e d a t t h a t
t i m e . I t i s n o t g o o d p l a n n i n g a n d a g a i n s t w h a t i s p r o p o s e d i n
t h e G e n e r a l . P l a n . C o n v e n i e n c e m a r k e t s , s u c h a s " 7 - 1 1 " a n d " S t o p
N G o " a r e o n t h e b o r d e r s o f C z o n e s , a n d t h e r e f o r e i n t h e p r o p e r
z o n e , w h e r e a s t h i s s t o r e i s n o t . A p p l i c a n t a g r e e d t o t h e c o n d i -
t i o n s o f t h e o r i g i n a l z o n e v a r i a n c e . H e w a s a g a i n s t g r a n t i n g t h e
e x t e n s i o n .
C o m m i s s i o n e r D e n n i s f e l t n e i g h b o r h o o d s h o p p i n g c o n v e n i e n c e i s v e r y
u s e f u l f r o m a p e r s o n a l s t a n d p o i n t a n d t h e r e i s a n e e d f o r t h i s t y p e
o f s h o p p i n g a r e a ; h o w e v e r , a l l s t r u c t u r e s o f n o n c o n f o r m i n g s t a t u s
a r e d u e t o e x p i r e i n 1 9 7 4 , a n d g r a n t i n g t h i s r e q u e s t w o u l d b e s e t t -
i n g a p r e c e d e n t . H e a g r e e d t h e u s e i n a r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a w a s n o t
g o o d p l a n n i n g .
C o m m i s s i o n e r A t k i n s m o v e d t o d e n y m o d i f i c a t i o n i n Z o n e V a r i a n c e
C a s e N o . 6 7 - 2 0 7 a s a p p l i c a n t h a s n o t s h o w n a n y c i r c u m s t a n c e s t o
l e g a l l y g r a n t r e q u e s t , a n d g r a n t i n g w o u l d b e d e t r i m e n t a l t o t h e
e f f e c t o f t h e G e n e r a l P l a n . M o t i o n w a s s e c o n d e d b y C o m m i s s i o n e r
G a r v i n a n d c a r r i e d i n r o l l c a l l v o t e a s f o l l o w s :
A Y E S : C o m m i s s i o n e r s A t k i n s , G a r v i n , L a w s o n , D e n n i s
N O E S : C o m m i s s i o n e r s - S t a r t i n
A s s t . C i t y A t t o r n e y W h i t e r e a d t i t l e t o R e s o l u t i o n N o . 7 1 - 4 3 2 P C ,
A R E S O L U T I O N O F T H E P L A N N I N G C O M M I S S I O N O F T H E C I T Y O F T E M P L E C I T Y
D E N Y I N G M O D I F I C A T I O N I N Z O N E V A R I A N C E C A S E 6 7 - 2 0 7 . C o m m i s s i o n e r
G a r v i n m o v e d t o w a i v e f u r t h e r r e a d i n g a n d a d o p t , s e c o n d e d b y C o m -
m i s s i o n e r L a w s o n a n d p a s s e d . T h o s e p r e s e n t w e r e i n f o r m e d o f t h e
t e n - d a y a p p e a l p e r i o d .
6 . P U B L I C H E A R I N G : C O N D I T I O N A L U S E P E R M I T C A S E 7 1 - 3 5 5
C h u r c h o f . t h e L a t t e r D a y S a i n t s - O w n e r
9 4 6 8 E a s t B r o a d w a y , T e m p l e C i t y
B i s h o p E u g e n e T h e y s . - A p p l i c a n t
C h u r c h o f t h e L a t t e r D a y S a i n t s
3 9 3 S o u t h T u s t i n A v e n u e , O r a n g e , C a .
S i t e : 9 4 6 8 E a s t B r o a d w a y , T e m p l e C i t y
P l a n n i n g . D i r e c t o r D r a g i c e v i c h r e f e r r e d t o a l e t t e r r e c e i v e d f r o m t h e
a p p l i c a n t r e q u e s t i n g a 1 8 0 - d a y d e l a y i n t h e c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h e
c o n d i t i o n a l u s e p e r m i t b e c a u s e o f u n f o r e s e e n c o n d i t i o n s i n c l u d i n g
f u n d r a i s i n g . p r o g r a m . _
C o m m i s s i o n e r A t k i n s m o v e d t o p o s t p o n e c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f C o n d i t i o n a l
U s e P e r m i t C a s e 7 1 - 3 5 5 u n t i l A p r i l 1 1 , 1 9 7 2 , s e c o n d e d b y C o m m i s -
s i o n e r S t a r t i n a n d p a s s e d u n a n i m o u s l y . I t w a s a n n o u n c e d t h a t t h e
h e a r i n g w o u l d b e r e n o t i c e d .
7 . P U B L I C H E A R I N G : C O N D I T I O N A L U S E P E R M I T C A S E 7 1 - 3 5 6
C i t y o f T e m p l e C i t y O w n e r
S u n n y S l o p e W a t e r C o m p a n y - P u r c h a s e r - A p p l i c a n t
1 0 4 0 E l C a m p o D r i v e , P a s a d e n a , C a .
S i t e : N o r t h e a s t c o r n e r E n c i n i t a a n d L o n g d e n A v e n u e s
D i r e c t o r D r a g i c e v i c h s t a t e d t h e a p p l i c a n t p r o p o s e s t o d e v e l o p a n d
o p e r a t e a w a t e r p r o d u c t i o n w e l l i n a n R - 1 z o n e . H e g a v e t h e
s t a f f r e p o r t , e x p l a i n e d E x h i b i t " A " w h i c h s h o w e d t h e p r o p o s e d d e -
v e l o p m e n t , a n d l i s t e d t h e s t a f f p r o p o s a l s .
"
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
October 12, 1971 Page four.
Asst. City Attorney White wished to go on record that the City Attorney's
office has occasion to represent the applicant as council on occasion,
but not in this instance, and he felt there would be no conflict of in-
terest.
The public hearing was declared open.
Mr. Kenneth I. Mullen, Consulting .Engineer for applicant, 735 W. Duarte
Road, Arcadia, explained the proposed well is-part of a master plan de-
velopment which has been adopted by the applicant, initiated this past
year. The intent is to upgrade the system over a number of years. AlT
equipment will be below the ground and in well casing and noiseless.
Control building will enclose electrical and other equipment for opera-
tion of well. This location is most suited for a well to get the required
quantity of water from source to the mains. An operator would be on site
for treatment once a day. The site would have a park -like setting and be
compatible with the surrounding residential area, with only the roof of
the control building seen above the walls.
Commissioner Garvin was of the opinion that a field trip to see other
water wells would be beneficial in deciding this case.
Mr. Robert Clary, on the Board of Directors for the applicant, 7023
410 La Presa, San Gabriel, explained the need for an additional water well
and the water supply system set up by the Sunny Slope Water Company,
and the water needs for Temple City. The loss of a well at Burton and
Longden created a problem, but even if it were re- established it would
not solve distribution problems for the Temple City area. The projected
plans are not a "crash program ", will probably take five years. If the
application for a water well is approved, the well would be in operation
in two years, and possibly next year. The actual drilling would take
about nine days, and to complete the installation would take about a
month. There would be some noise connected with the drilling. The
depth they expect to drill is 950 ft. Mr. Clary said, if the Commission
desired to have a study session to further explore this subject, Mr.
Mullen was retained by Sunny Slope Water Company and would be at the
Commission's disposal to advise and answer questions.
There was no one else to speak for or against the application; Commis-
sioner Garvin moved to continue the case as an open public hearing to
the next regular meeting, seconded by Commissioner Atkins and so moved.
8. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE VARIANCE CASE NO. 71 -357
Santa Anita Medical, Inc. - Owner
5522 N. Gracewood Avenue, Temple City
Planning Director gave the staff report, explaining the applicant
proposes to build screen walls in excess of 6 ft. in height in the re-
quired yard areas. He referred to the plot plan marked Exhibit "A"
showing partially existing structures and facilities of the Santa Anita
Hospital, and the proposed block screens. He also referred to a render-
ing applicant had brought in that evening showing proposed project.
The public hearing was declared open.
Mr. David Oakley, 9963 Duffy Street, Temple City, addressed the Commis -
sion, saying the proposed screen walls were for aesthetic purposes,
casting shadows on the building, and screening patients' rooms from the
public view. The walls were serf- supporting, having steel reinforce-
ments, but were attached to the building with beams for appearance pur-
poses. He presented to the Commissioners a montage of the subject prop-
erty, and stated the proposal is an attempt to modernize and upgrade the
buildings. The blocks will be cast in a color still to be determined,
so that there will be no need to paint them, and they will not chip or
peel. The blue roof as shown in the plans will replace or- cover what
is there. It is perforated, waterproof but not water- tight.
1111
•
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
October 12, 1971 Page five,
Mrs® Arleigh Rasmusson, 10243 Nadine, asked if the proposed walls
1111 would eliminate any of the hospital noises, and was told they would not;
the walls were being erected for aesthetic purposes.
Mr. John Stac e, 5626 Gracewood, speaking in opposition, was concerned
that the walls would be in the required setback areas, and it was ex-
plained this was the reason applicant was requesting a zone variance.
Mr. Stacey was also concerned that the proposed plot plan differed from
the plan approved in Zone Variance Case 69 -283; it was pointed out that
the basic request in that zone variance was for a parking variance. Mr.
Stacey was also concerned about traffic coming south on Gracewood and
entering.Daines Drive, stating he felt the proposed walls would be a
site obstruction. Director Dragicevich pointed out on the exhibit how
this had been taken into consideration with a 40 ft, clearance being
provided.
In rebuttal, Mr. Oakley stated the sound problem will not be alleviated
by these screen walls - they were not designed for this purpose.
Commissioner Atkins moved to close public hearing, seconded by Commis-
sioner Startin and passed®
Commissioner Garvin had no objections, as long as he could make it a
condition of granting that the color be precast into the blocks, and
it was determined he could. The screening walls, he felt, would do
much for surrounding area as well as the subject property, which is
unique. Granting the request would certainly not be detrimental to
surrounding properties. He was in favor.
Commissioner Startin was also in favor as long as the patients could
see out, and he was assured they could. He felt it would enhance the
buildings.
Commissioner Lawson concurred, stating it would break up the long ex-
panse of building, and is compatible with the neighborhood,
Commissioner Atkins felt it would benefit neighbors as well as upgrade
the property in question, and said property is unique and the setbacks
as shown are adequate.
Chairman Dennis was not particularly in favor of the appearance of the
walls, but would go along with the other Commissioners.
Commissioner Garvin moved to grant Zone Variance Case 71 -357, including
a condition that the color be precast into the blocks, and with staff
recommendations, for the reason the applicant's property is unique, and
the proposal is not detrimental to surrounding neighborhood. Motion
was seconded by Commissioner Atkins and passed.
Asst. City Attorney White read title to Resolution .71- 433PC, A RESOLU-
TION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY GRANTING
VARIANCE I N ZONE VARIANCE CASE 71-357. Commissioner Lawson moved to
waive further reading and adopt, seconded by Commissioner Garvin and
passed.
9. COMMUNICATIONS
,A. Reference was made by the Planning Director to letter
sent to County of Los Angeles Regional Planning Commission
opposing Proposed Parcel Map No, 666, specifically opposing
the 40 ft, lot width of. Parcel 3 as shown on that map. He
stated he had conferred with Chairman Dennis and it was agreed
to send the letter in behalf of the Commission. The Commis-
sioners agreed,
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
October 1 2 , 1971 Page s i x
•
1
1
1
B. Letter from Richard G. Clark, M. D. , 302.0 Beard Road, Napa,
Calif., was referred to, which concerns tax base of mobile
home parks. Letter was received and filed.
C. Memo from the City Manager re. the Rosemead Development
Project, stating the City Council endorsed the program of
action as submitted by the Planning Commission, and encourag-
ing the Commission to initiate immediate action toward im-
plementing the proposed plan of work, was reported by the
Planning Director.
1 0 . TIME FOR THOSE I N THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO SPEAK
Louis T. Gilbertson, Mayor of the City of Temple City, addressed
the Commission and expressed his concern about communications
between the City Council and Commissions - there should be more
exchange of ideas and opinions. A City staff seminar, sometime
in January, was proposed, which he believed might have great
benefit, and he requested subject matter, matters meaningful to
the members of the Commission and /or the City. He asked the
Commissioners to submit their ideas as soon as possible so some
plans could be initiated.
11.
Mayor Gilbertson further mentioned a new plan he had initiated to
apprise people of items in regard to higher taxes. The material
prepared for the City Council will be distributed to the Commission
and keep them better informed.
Mr. Oakley took the podium and congratulated the Commission on doing
a fine job.
A. Director Dragicevich referred to map showing future street
easement in Tract No. 11699, in the area of Arden Drive, stat-
ing that there had been a. request to have it vacated. The
Asst. City Attorney stated that, under Section 8300 of the
Streets and Highways Code, the appropriate procedure is that
the City Council initiates proceedings to vacate the street.
It is the only way the City can eliminate it, clear the re-
cords and title for the property owner. Planning Commission
can make wishes known to City Council who has ultimate decision.
It was pointed out that such easements preclude any structures
being built on them.
Commissioner Garvin moved memo be sent to the City Council to
the effect that the Planning Commission favors vacation of
future street easement in subject case. Motion was seconded
by Commissioner Atkins and passed.
B. Memo from the City Manager re. -- abatement of property nuisance
at 9011 Olive Street was brought to the attention of the Com-
mission, along with exhibit photographs of the property.
Charles F. Wakely, 1695 Locust. Street, Pasadena, one of the
owners of the subject property, reviewed the improvements he had
made recently, including paving over concrete, new striping for
parking 'areas, and got a l l concrete i n best shape he could. The
walls have been repaired several times and are continually being
knocked down. There is not enough clearance for autos; all four
"
1
1
P L A N N I N G C O M M I S S I O N M I N U T E S
O c t o b e r 1 2 , 1 9 7 1 P a g e s e v e n .
b a y s e x i t t h r o u g h t h e f i r s t b a y o n l y . T h e a c c u m u l a t i o n o f d i r t
o n t h e w a l l s h a s r e s i s t e d a l l h i s a t t e m p t s t o r e m o v e , a n d w i l l
h a v e t o b e s p r a y p a i n t e d , p r o b a b l y i n a d a r k c o l o r .
T h e P l a n n i n g D i r e c t o r s t a t e d t h e m a i n p r o b l e m a r e a s : b e t t e r m a i n -
t e n a n c e , b e t t e r d r a i n a g e , a n d s o m e b o d y m u s t b e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r
c l e a n i n g o f f a c i l i t y . M r . W a k e l y s a i d m a i n t e n a n c e p e o p l e l i v e
o n R a n c h o R e a l a n d a r e t h e r e a l l d a y l o n g f o r a l l i n t e n t s a n d
p u r p o s e s .
T h e C i t y M a n a g e r p o i n t e d o u t t h a t t h e c o n c r e t e s i d e w a l k s a n d
d r i v e w a y a p r o n s w h i c h w e r e c o v e r e d w i t h a s e a l e r c o a t w i l l h a v e
t o b e r e s t o r e d . H e s u g g e s t e d M r . W a k e l y m e e t w i t h s t a f f a n d
d e t e r m i n e h o w t o c o r r e c t t h e s i t u a t i o n , a n d m a k e ' , , a c o m p r e h e n s i v e
r e p o r t t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n b e f o r e s e t t i n g p u b l i c h e a r i n g . I t w a s
s u g g e s t e d t h a t s o m e c o n t r o l b e p l a c e d o n h o u r s o f o p e r a t i o n .
C o m m i s s i o n e r G a r v i n m o v e d t o c o n t i n u e t o t h e _ n e x t r e g u l a r m e e t i n g
t o g i v e s t a f f a n d o w n e r o p p o r t u n i t y t o g e t t o g e t h e r a n d a t t e m p t
t o r e s o l v e t h e p r o b l e m s . M o t i o n w a s s e c o n d e d b y C o m m i s s i o n e r
A t k i n s a n d p a s s e d .
C . C i t y M a n a g e r a s k e d t h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n e r s s u b m i t t h e i r i d e a s
f o r t h e C i t y s e m i n a r e i t h e r t o h i m o r t o M r . G i l b e r t s o n a s
s o o n a s p o s s i b l e , s o t h a t t h e s e m i n a r w i l l b e a s m e a n i n g f u l
a n d r e l e v a n t a s p o s s i b l e .
D . P l a n n i n g D i r e c t o r m e n t i o n e d t h a t , s i n c e a l i g h t a g e n d a i s
s c h e d u l e d f o r O c t o b e r 2 6 t h , a s t u d y s e s s i o n c o u l d b e h e l d a t
t h a t t i m e , c o n t i n u i n g t h e s t u d y o f R o s e m e a d B o u l e v a r d P r o j e c t
a n d w a t e r w e l l s . I t w a s s u g g e s t e d t h e C o m m i s s i o n c o u l d r e -
v i e w t h e c o n s u l t a n t s a n d s e e w h a t a n e c o n o m i c a n a l y s i s w o u l d
c o v e r .
E . R e f e r e n c e w a s m a d e t o l e t t e r a d d r e s s e d . . t o t h e P l a n n i n g C o m m i s - :
s i o n f r o m t h e L o s A n g e l e s C o u n t y R e g i o n a l P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n
r e . p r o p o s e d s u b d i v i s i o n T r a c t N o . 3 0 1 1 5 , r e q u e s t i n g c o m m e n t s
o r r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s . T h e C o m m i s s i o n d i s c u s s e d t h e m a p a n d t h e
d e c i s i o n w a s t o r e c e i v e a n d f i l e , w i t h n o c o m m e n t .
F . D i r e c t o r D r a g i c e v i c h g a v e a r e p o r t o n t h e t h r e e c a s e s w h i c h
w e r e b e f o r e t h e M i n o r Z o n i n g M o d i f i c a t i o n C o m m i t t e e t h a t m o r n -
i n g a n d a r e o n f i l e i n t h e P l a n n i n g D e p a r t m e n t .
1 2 . A D J O U R N M E N T
T h e r e b e i n g n o f u r t h e r b u s i n e s s , C o m m i s s i o n e r G a r v i n m o v e d t o
a d j o u r n t o t h e n e x t r e g u l a r m e e t i n g o f t h e . P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n o n
O c t o b e r 2 6 , 1 9 7 1 , s e c o n d e d b y C o m m i s s i o n e r S t a r t i n a n d c a r r i e d .
T i m e o f a d j o u r n m e n t w a s 1 0 : 1 5 p . m .
A T T E S T :
v ��
c r e t a r y
c ,
C h a i r m a n