HomeMy Public PortalAboutMinutes - 1974/11/12 - RegularPLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
. November 12, 1974, .
INITIATION:
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Pro Tem Atkins called to order the regular meeting of the
IIIPlanning Commission of the City of Temple City at 7:30 p.m., November
12, 1974.
PLEDGE. OF ALLEGIANCE
Chairman Pro Tem Atkins led the Pledge of Allegiance to - the Flag.
3. ROLL CALL
•
Present: Commissioners Clark, Lawson, Stacy, Atkins
Absent: Chairman Breazeal .
Also present: City Manager Koski, Asst. City Attorney White,
Planning Director Dragicevich and Assistant Planner. Burnham.
Commissioner Lawson moved to excuse Chairman Breazeal's absence for
cause. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Clark and passed.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Regular Meeting of October 8, 1974
There being no additions or corrections to the minutes, Commissioner
Stacy moved they be approved as written. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner Lawson and passed.
5. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING
- DETERMINATION OF EXISTENCE OF PUBLIC' NUISANCE
10516 Daines Drive (Case No. 74 -18)
The Planning Director reviewed the history of this case, first con-
sidered by the Planning Commission at their meeting of January 10,
1974, and continued Rat several meetings since that time to allow the
property owner to fulfill the conditions of abatement. Inspection of
the property, he continued, on November 12th indicated that the remain-
ing work (repainting the house and. reconstruction of the driveway approach)
had not been done nor was there any evidence of any preparation to install
said driveway.
The public hearing was opened. No one came forward to speak. Commis-
sioner Lawson moved to close public hearing, seconded by Commissioner
Clark, and passed.
In closed discussion the Commissioners were unanimous in their opinion
that ten months was sufficient time to allow the property owner to
abate the nuisance and the Commission has exerted considerable effort
to work with the owner. Commissioner Stacy moved to determine the exist-
ence of a public nuisance and refer the matter to the City Council for
abatement. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Lawson and passed.
Asst. City Attorney White read title to Resolution 74- 591PC, A RESOLUTION
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY. DETERMINING THE
- EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND RECOMMENDING ABATEMENT THEREOF. Com-
missioner Stacy moved to waive further reading and adopt, seconded by.
Commissioner Clark and the motion carried unanimously.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MEETING OF NOVEMBER 12, 1974
PAGE TWO
6. PUBLIC HEARING: RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CASE NO. 74 -.424
(Precise-Plan)
Noel Baldwin - Owner /Applicant
10017 Green Street
Temple City, California
1
Site: 10034 and 10040 Olive Street, 5204 North Baldwin
Avenue through 5312 Baldwin Avenue., 10017 through
10031 East Green Street, the vacant lot westerly
of 5301 N. Zadell Avenue, and approx. the westerly
half of 5311 through 5325 N. Zadell Avenue.
Director Dragicevich said the applicant requests approval of an RPD
Precise Plan relating to the construction of an 87 -unit condominium
project. He gave the background data on the project, referred to the
plot plan marked Exhibit "A ", to the landscaping plan Exhibit "C ",
exhibits showing proposed architectural appearance, elevation and floor
plans. He concluded by referring to the staff proposals if the Commis-
sion approves the Precise Plan.
Asst. City Attorney White informed those present that testimony tonight
should be restricted to whether the proposed Precise Plan complies with
the approved Provisional Plan, and not whether the project is suitable
to the area, etc,, as this has been established already.in previous
• .
hearings.
The public hearing was declared open.
1
•
1
•
Mr. Noel Baldwin, 10017 Green. Street, the developer, said he had read
the conditions and was in agreement with them.
There was no one else to speak in favor of the issue.
Mr. P1an1;,5330 Zadell, in opposition, said a petition had been submitted
against this project and an initiative to prevent it was in process. He
was advised that the Commission is aware of this action.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, Commissioner Lawson moved
to close public hearing, seconded by Couunissioner Stacy and the motion
passed.
Commissioner Lawson, in closed discussion, said staff had picked up those
items that were in the Commission's original resolution on this development
He had no further suggestions. Commissioner Clark concurred, adding that
the project plans had improved from what was originally submitted. He
asked about the fire hydrants, and was told the developer is required to
meet requirements and is in agreement. Chairman Pro Tem Atkins said the
precise plan is in conformance with the original provisional plan with
all recouauendations from the Planning Commission and City Council taken
into consideration.
Commissioner Stacy moved`to approve Residential Planned Development Case
74 -424 (Precise Plan) with staff conditions, inasmuch as it complies .:
with the Provisional Plan previously submitted and approved. Motion
was seconded by Commissioner Clark and carried -with no objections.
Asst. City Attorney White read title to Resolution 74- 593PC, A RESOLUTION
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPROVING A PRECISE
PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT IN RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CASE NO. 74 -424.
Commissioner Lawson moved to waive further reading and adopt, seconded by
Commissioner Stacy and the motion carried.
City Attorney White informed those present of the right of appeal.
Director Dragicevich called the Commission's attention to the Conditions,
,Covenants and Restrictions submitted by the developer for Commission
approval as required in Planning Commission approval of the Provisional
Plan. The Commissioners said they had all perused them and found them
complete and acceptable. They provide continued maintenance of the
property, protection for the buyers and would be in effect until the year
2030.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MEETING OF November 12, 1974 .PAGE THREE.
7. PUBLIC HEARING:
1
1
1
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO, 74 -427
Mr. and Mrs, Christ Cristopoulos - Owners
132 S, Virgil Avenue
Los Angeles, Ca. 90004
Mr. Stanley Van Amburgh Applicant
9232 Las Tunas Drive
Temple City, Ca.
Site: 9133 Las Tunas Drive
Director Dragicevich gave the staff report, saying the applicant proposes
to construct and operate an automobile repair garage at the site. He
explained the plot plan marked Exhibit "A" showing a proposed 3 -bay
repair garage and landscaping. He reviewed the staff proposals, and
referred to an elevation exhibit of the proposed structure. All exist-
ing structures on the property involved would be removed. He concluded
by saying a negative declaration of environmental impact was prepared
inasmuch as this development will have no adverse effect on the environ-
ment as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act.
The Public Hearing was declared open.
Mr. Stanle Van Amburgh, 9232 Las Tunas Drive, applicant, summarized the
istory o is business activities in Temple City, concluding by saying
his . present site was too small, inadequate and run- down. If the project
is approved, he would route his customers from Las Tunas Drive and exit
via the alley. He was in agreement with gates across the rear when the .
business is closed, and was considering putting gates across the front to
prevent entrance at those times too, although the bays will all be locked
during hours of closing. His hours of operation are 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday. There will be no parking for his business on the
street or in the alley. He felt the project will upgrade the area and
will be an improvement over what is on that property presently. He
understood the staff conditions and was in favor of them. He will do
no body work nor heavy mechanical repair, nor will he be working on heavy
diesel trucks or motorcycles. The five parking spaces in the rear of
the property will be . for storage of cars awaiting pick -up. The Honda
Motorcycle shop will take over his present location when he vacates. In
answer to Commissioner Atkins question, Mr. Van Amburgh said he was agree-
able to installing a permanent irrigation system in the planters which are
part of the landscaping plan.
Mr. Jerry Jambazian, 9136 Las Tunas Drive, owner of Wonder Cleaners, was
concerned about t e in- and -out driveway approach proposed on Las Tunas
Drive. He was informed it was only for entrance, and said he still felt
this was a dangerous approach, and in addition, the City would be losing
on- street parking. Otherwise, he was in favor of the project and felt it
would improve the appearance of the property.
Mrs.Frances K, Felon, 9118 Hermosa, speaking in opposition, was concerned
about the noise from repair work and racing motors.
In rebuttal, Mr. Van Amburgh said the bulk of the work is done in enclosed
building, he does not work on racing cars, his cars have mufflers on them,
the back portion of the property is for parking and storage of cars. With
the wall proposed along the rear of the property and the cars being far
forward where the work area is to be located, there should be a minimum
of noise. In reply to Mr..Jambazian's concern, only one parking space wil]
be lost to the public on Las Tunas Drive, and the approach to this loca-
tion will be no more hazardous than to Winchell's or any other business
along Las Tunas Drive.
'Commissioner Lawson moved to close public hearing, seconded by Commissions/
Stacy and passed.'
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MEETING OF NOVEMBER. 12, 1974 PAGE FOUR
The Commissioners were in agreement that the. proposed project met the require-
ments for granting a conditional use permit, the structure was pleasing and
well planned, a permanent irrigation system should be required, but the front
.
gate should be at the discretion of the applicant.. Commissioner Stacy moved
to grant Conditional Use Permit in Case No. 74 -4.27 `on the basis that the
site is adequate in size, has sufficient access, the use will not have an
adverse effect on the enjoyment or. valuation of adjacent properties, and sub=
ject to staff proposals and addition of requirement of a permanent irrigation
system. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Clark and passed with no objection
sst. City Attorney White read title to Resolution 74- 593PC, A RESOLUTION OF
HE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE
ERMIT IN CASE NO. 74 -427. Commissioner Lawson moved to waive further reading
I
and adopt, seconded by Commissioner Stacy and the motion carried.
Asst. City Attorney White informed those present of the right of appeal.
8. PUBLIC HEARING: ZONE VARIANCE CASE 74 -428
Richard L._Bowen - Owner /Applicant
1620 Melanie Lane
Arcadia, Can
fr
Site:, 9703 Val Street
PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
Tentative Parcel Map No. 551
Richard L: Bowen - Owner /Applicant
Site: 9703 Val Street
Chairman.Pro Tem Atkins said these two agenda items would be heard con-
currently:, although the Commissioners will consider them separately
in making their decisions. •
Director:Dragicevich gave the staff report on the both cases, saying
the applicant proposes to divide the subject property into two parcels,
each having 50 ft. average lot width instead of the required 60 ft. He
reviewed the. plot plan marked Exhibit "A" which shows existing and pro-
posed development, reviewed the factual data on the subject property and
summarized the staff: :proposals. He added there were a number of mature
trees which staff. feels are desirable to save and incorporate into the
development, which can be done by realigning the structures. A further
condition he suggested was the labeling of the parcels "1" and "2" in-
stead of "A" and "B" in compliance with request from the County - .Recorder's
office. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared on this project becaus
• of the mature trees involved, and the final conclusion was that, although
the density was being increased from one to two units, there would be no
adverse effect on the environment as defined by the California Environmenta
Quality Act. •
1
The pullic hearing was declared open on both agenda items 8 and 9.
Mr, Richard Bowen, 1620 Melanie Lane, applicant, said he is proposing
two 4- bedroom, 2 -car garage homes on these two lots with 1600 -1700 sq.
ft. in each. He was concerned about the prime tree on Lot No. 1, as it
is difficult to get the measurements of it and it might prove to be in
the way when construction proceeds, • He has discussed saving as many
trees as possible by. realigning the structures. The tree superintendent
at City Hall inspected the Cedar tree and judged it to be healthy and
worth saving. He would like to have vehicular access to the backyardi
for motor homes and boats, but the driveway would make the area for struc-
tures too limited.
Mrs, Thomas B. Bowmar., previous owner of the property, said she inherited
the property from her father and it was subdivided once, and it was under-
• stood that . the remaining portion would be subdivided into two 50 ft. lots,
but in the meantime the City passed an ordinance requiring 60 ft. lot
width for residential lots, It is a large parcel and in that area there
are many.50 ft,.. parcels and some with less width.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MEETING OF NOVEMBER 12, 1974 PAGE FIVE
Commissioner Stacy moved to close public hearing, seconded by Commissioner
Clark and the motion carried.
• Commissioner Lawson moved to certify the Environmental Impact Report as it
had been prepared in accordance with State law and that the Planning Com-
mission considered it in arriving at their decision. Motion was seconded
by Commissioner Stacy and carried.
In considering the zone variance request, Commissioner Lawson considered
splitting the lot and building on it would improve the surrounding area.
The existing lots to the rear are all 50 ft. wide, as well as many in the
vicinity, and some are smaller. The size of the property is above the
minimum 7200.sq. ft. Commissioner Stacy said the project would dispose of
something that is somewhat rundown and has reached its full depreciation.
The property is unique and large, larger than most of surrounding lots.
Without a variance the applicant will be denied privileges enjoyed by other
property owners. This request will not be detrimental to public welfare.
Commissioner Clark said location of the property on a through street removes
some of his objections. Chairman Pro Tem Atkins concurred with the Commis-
sioners in their thinking.
Commissioner Lawson moved to grant zone variance request in that the property
is unique in size, the project will not be detrimental to public welfare nor
damaging to neighborhood property or neighborhood, and with staff conditions.
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Stacy and passed.
Asst. City Attorney White read title to Resolution 74- 594PC, A RESOLUTION OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY GRANTING ZONE VARIANCE IN
CASE NO.. 74 -428. Commissioner Stacy moved to waive further reading and
adopt, seconded by Commissioner Clark and the motion passed..
Asst. City Attorney White informed those present of the right of appeal.
ICommissioner. Stacy moved to approve Tentative Tract Map 551 subject to staff
conditions, relabeling lots from "A" and "B" to "1" and "2 ". Motion was
seconded by Commissioner Clark and passed with no objections.
Asst. City Attorney White read title to Resolution 74- 5.95PC, A RESOLUTION OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPROVING TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NO. 551. Commissioner Stacy moved to waive further reading and
adopt, seconded by Commissioner Clark and the motion passed unanimously.
10. PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION:
Tentative Tract Map No. 550
Roy M. and Charlotte Almquist
10117 La Rosa Drive
Temple City 91780
1
1
Site: Rosevale and Green Streets
Director Dragicevich said applicant proposes to approve a lot line ad-
justment for three existing parcels. He proceeded to explain the plot
plan marked Exhibit "A" which shows existing and proposed parcels. Par-
cels 2 and 3 are vacant. He reviewed the factual data.on the subject
property, and summarized the staff proposals if the request is granted..
Applicant is anxious to put in public works improvements as proposed
on Green Street. No Environmental Impact Report is required on this
proposal,
Mr. Roy Almquist, 10117 La Rosa Drive, said he agrees with staff condi-
tions very much.
The Commissioners were in agreement that they had no objections; the
proposal would be a realignment resulting in increasing the size of a
very small lot and making it a lot suitable to build a home with some
open space. While the alignment will still be odd - shaped, -it is an
improvement over what is there.
Commissioner Lawsom moved to approve: Tentative Parcel Map No. 550 with
staff conditions. .Motion was seconded by Commissioner Stacy and passed.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MEETING OF NOVEMBER 12, 1974 PAGE'~ SIX
Asst. City Attorney White read title to Resolution 74- 596PC, A RESOLUTION OF
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP NO. 550. Commissioner Lawson moved to waive further reading and adopt,
41reconded by Commissioner Clark and the motion passed.
Chairman Pro Tem Atkins called a recess at 9:05, and recnnvened the meeting
at 9:15 p.m.
I1. PLANNING COMMISSION. CONSIDERATION:
Tentative Tract Map No.. 31002
Frost Development, Inc. — Applicant
650 West Duarte Road
Arcadia, Ca.
1
Site: 5323 and. 5329 Santa Anita Avenue
Director Dragicevich gave the staff report, saying the applicant
proposes to construct a condominium project consisting of 11 two -
bedroom units. He referred to Exhibit "A" showing the plot plan of
the proposed development project. Proposed are 10 two -story and one single
story two- bedroom condominium units in 2, 3 and 4 unit structures arranged
on both sides of a central drive. He called attention to Exhibit "B ",
the elevation plan, and Exhibit "C ", the floor plan, reviewed the factual
data and briefly summarized the staff proposals. In conclusion he said
the applicant had prepared. an Environmental Impact Report concluding that,
if the project is approved,, there will be a slight increase in the demand
for municipal services, etc. However, the General Plan Map shows this
area as suitable for low - medium density. Developer will attempt to save
as many mature, healthy trees as possible,and fences and /or walls will
be erected appropriately around the project.
The public hearing was declared open.
Mr, W. D. Frost, 650 West Duarte Road, said he has.worked closely with.
the City staff in developing a suitable plan for presentation to the
Coivaission, redesigning the project several times, and meeting three
times with the. Los Angeles County Subdivision Committee over the past
eight months. He was familiar. with the conditions of approval being
proposed and was willing to comply with all of them. -.He reaffirmed his
intention to save all possible existing trees.: Regarding the fence on
the north side, he had talked with the owner on several occasions and
they had reached an agreement as to the nature and type of construction
of the wall to be built between that owner's property and the condominium.
In answer to Commissioner Clark's question about fencing around the.pool.
• area, Mr. Frost said there would be a 6 ft. high block wall around the
outside of the area and a 5 ft, fence inside the project around that area,
with a self - locking and self- latching gate to.meet the requirements. It
will be landscaped to shield it from view from Santa Anita Avenue.
Responding to question from Commissioner Stacy, Mr. Frost said the en-
trances into the units will be from the walkway on the north and south
property lines. Further, the front yard area is 15 ft. as required.
There is a 42" non -view obscuring wall with a trellis structure in the
front of Unit 11 which, not being roofed, was not considered by staff
as an encroachment_ This. item was questioned by the City Manager and
it was determined to resolve this matter through further investigation.
Mr. John Provines, 5329 Santa Anita Avenue, was in favor of a project
with higher density, but considered this project well planned and spoke
in favor of it. He is anxious to dispose of his property which is .one
of the two lots on which the development will be built.-
1
Mr. John Phillips, 5323 Santa Anita Avenue, owner-of the second piece
of property in the proposed development, said the project would up-
grade Temple City and he favored it:
- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MEETING OF NOVEMBER 12, 1974 PAGE SEVEN
Mr: Pat Owens, 5341 Santa Anita, spoke in favor of the project, but said.
he had concerns about the fence which would separate it from his property
on the north. However, he and the developer had agreed on this item
prior to the meeting. He had five slides which he showed to the Com-
mission showing fencing between multiple -unit projects and private
properties, where walls had been required but never.were built. He.
expressed concern about the wall proposed on the north side obscuring
view of drivers backing out of his driveway (he has two units on. his
,property besides his residence), and it was explained the wall would
be required to.be stepped down to 42" toward the front property line.
Mrs. Roland R. Lanzi, 5316 Farago, asked if the wall behind them will
e broug t up to 6 t. in height, and was told it would be, also that
her apricot tree would be saved if possible. The patios of the proposed
development would be facing her property, but would have beam trellis
work to protect privacy. The room facing her property in each of the
units on that side of.the project would be . the living room.
Mr. Roland Lanzi, 5316 Farago, questioned if the wall to be increased
to 6 ft. was steel enforced, and whether it would tolerate the height
increase. The Asst, Planner replied that the wall was built as a re-
tainer and according to the builders it had been built: :with required
footings. and steel reinforcements. Mr. Lanzi concluded that he favored
the project as that property is. a jungle and run -down.
Mrs. Vernnica Taft, 5326 Farago, asked from which point the wall between
her property would be measured to the height of 6 ft. as she will be
bordering the pool area and was concerned about her children being able •
to scale the wall. There is a grade difference between the properties.
It was pointed out the wall would be measured 6 ft. from the project
side. She was in favor of the project, and asked that all trees possible
be saved.
There being no one else to speak to the issue, Commissioner Stacy moved
to close the public hearing, seconded by Commissioner Clark and the
,motion passed.
In closed discussion Commissioner Lawson said the project meets the City
'requirements except for the question of the wall with a trellis in the
front yard which may require a zone variance or remove the trellis work
and reduce the height of the 42" wall With staff conditions imposed
this request would result in a proper development for these properties.
Commissioner Stacy was very much in favor of the project. The access
route was different and he liked.it. He concurred with Commissioner
Lawson about the trellis work and the 42" wall.
Commissioner Clark concurred, saying the project will be good for Temple
City. He felt an agreement could be reached about the trellis work. He
congratulated the architect on a good plan.
Chairman Pro Tem Atkins was also impressed by the architect's plans and
ideas in spacing the structure and breaking up the concrete area. 'The
project will improve the neighborhood.' The developer has made every
effort to be a good neighbor and cooperate with adjoining property owners.
He, too, would like to save the trellis work and said a zone variance
bears consideration.
Commissioner Lawson moved. to certify that the Environmental Impact Report
had been prepared in accord with State law and that the Planning Commissioi
considered it in arriving at their decision. Motion was seconded by .
Commissioner Stacy and passed,
Commissioner Lawson moved to approve Tentative Tract Map No. 31002 as it
complies with all applicable regulations, with staff proposals with
revised Exhibit "A" to reflect the changes in the walls. Motion was
seconded by Commissioner Stacy and passed.
Asst.. City Attorney White read title to Resolution 74- 597PC, A RESOLUTION
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY APPROVING TENTATIVE
TRACT NO. 31002. Commissioner Lawson moved to waive further reading and
adopt, seconded by Commissioner Stacy and the motion passed.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
.MEETING OF NOVEMBER 12, 1974 PAGE EIGHT
12. COMMUNICATIONS - There were none.
0 13. TIME FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO SPEAK - No one came forward. .
14. MATTERS-FROM CITY OFFICIALS
1
•
1
•
115. ADJOURNMENT
(a) Director Dragicevich brought to the Planning Commission attention
a proposed ordinance re Display of Merchandise on Public Sidewalks
in Front of any Building in all Commercial Zones.
The Commissioners were of the opinion they would like to study this
item prior to setting public hearing.
(b) Set Public Hearing to Consider Amendment of the Municipal Code re.
Change of Zone from R-4 to R-2 on Lower Azusa Road from Willmonte
to Glickman Avenues.
Commissioner Stacy moved to set this item for public hearing on
December 10, 1974. Commissioner Clark seconded the motiork and it
passed.
(c) Permit for Garage, Lawn and Patio Sales
The Commissioners were in agreement to include this item on their
first study session.
(d) Director Dragicevich announced that Asst. Planner Burnham is leav-
ing the City employ to assume duties as Associate Planner with the
City of. Whittier. He. said Mr. Burnham had been with the City for
seven years and that he has been a good addition to the staff and
will be missed. The Commission wished him well and agreed he will
be missed by all of them.
(e) Asst. Planner Burnham referred to letter from the Sierra. Madres
Girl Scout Council regarding permit to purchase a building in an
R-1 zone for a Girl Scout House. The Commission put this into study
session to be held this month.
(f) Chairman Pro Tem Atkins asked what. procedure is followed to see that
conditions of approval are fulfilled on projects .approved by the
Commission, and Asst. Planner Burnham explained the procedure of the-.
City, that 2 copies of the approved plot plan Exhibit 7A", plus two
copies of the resolution are sent to the Building Dept., and a final
approval by the Building Inspector is to include checking that all .
conditions have been met.
(g)
Chairman Pro Tem Atkins asked staff to investigate the property at
the northwest corner of Daines and El Monte where a hot-rod run
is developing in the front yard. He also referred to the property
at 10945 Freer Street, Asst. Planner Burnham said the front house
has been fixed up, and staff is allowing the property owner time to
accumulate funds to improve the rear house. The middle house was
repainted and restuccoed recently. In view of the owner's past per-
formance in upgrading the property, the staff was not pursuing a
property nuisance against the owner.
There being
to the next
seconded by
ATTEST:
no further business, Com.tissioner Lawson moved to adjourn
regular meeting of the Planning Commission. Motion was
Commissioner Clark and the meeting adjourned at 10:20 p.m.
Chairman