HomeMy Public PortalAboutA 1989-12-12 PLANNING COMMISSION � � �� � . � � . f ,
. . s��-�� � ^ - �
A G E N D A
LYNWOOD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING - 7:30 p.m.
_ City Hall Council Chambers
11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, CA
. g�1 /
DECEMBER 12, 1989 �
�1 _ R� EIVED �
CITY F LYNWOOD (
GTY C ERK.�i OFr"ICE
y Donald A. Dove D E C 0 8 1989
Chairperson AM - p ,.
_ 7i ii i11i12i1i2
{
�
Lena Cole-Dennis ��C rlt Mc ill r �
Commissioner Commissio r �
John K.-Haynes - ' Roy Pryo2-
Vice Chairman Commissioner
LuciSle Kanka , - ' • David J.Willis,
. (Jamal Muhsin) Commissioner
Alter.nate Commissi6ner .
C O M M I S S I O N C O U N S E L:
Henry S: , _ Douglas D. Barnes
, City Attorney ; � Deputy;City�Attorney
STAFF•
Vicente L. Mas, Director Aubrey D. Fenderson
Community Development Department Planning Manager
Art Barfield Louis Moralas
Planning Associate Planning Technician
�
�
�
I
i
_ - disk56: aqendall
, �
,, .
December 12, 1989
OPENING CEREMONIES: ,
A. Call meeting to order
B. Flag salute
C. Roll call of Commissioners
D. Certification of Agenda posting.
E. Approval of Minutes for October 10, 1989, and November
14, 1989 Planning Commission Meetings.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 25 (CUP 25)
Applicant: Oscar O. Aparicio
COMMENTS• I
I
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to develop a 21,000 sq. ft. auto center at 10733-
10749 Long Beach Boulevard in the C-2A (Medium-Commercial) �
zone. �
RECOMMENDED ACTION: I
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the �
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2296: i
A. Finding that Conditional Use Permit No. 21 will not
have a significant effect on the environment, and i
certifying the Negative Declartion as adequate.
i
B. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 25, subject to I
the stated conditions and requirements.
I
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS: ;
2. TENATIVE PARCEL MAP No. 11 (TPM 11) �
Applicant: Davis Development. �
COMMENTS: I
i
The Applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Parcel I
Map (No. 21800) to combine two (2j parcels into one (1) at I
the Northeast corner of Alameda and Lynwood Streets, in the
M (Manufacturing) zone. I
� RECOMMENDED ACTION:
�•� Staff respectfully requests, that after consideration the j
Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2303. �
A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt
from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as
amended by Section 15061 b(3).
B. Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 11, subject to the
� stated conditions and requirements.
disk56:agendall
�
I
( I
i I
� ` j
I
��
3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 30 (CUP 30)
, Applicant: Pau1 Pagnone ,
. � ....,,T..:,,,�.,�� .- � . .
The applicant is requesting approval of Conditional Use
Permit to develop a single family dwelling unit at 3351
" Elizabeth Avenue in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone. .
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the
- Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2341:
A. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt
from the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as
amended by Section 15061 b(3).
� B. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 30, subject to the
stated conditions and requirements.
4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 31 (CUP 31)
Applicant: Donald Chae
COMMENTS• '
` The applicant is requesting approval of Conditional Use
Permit to.develop a 135440 sq. ft. multi-tenant market place
at 3100 Imperial Highway in the CB-1 (Plan Business) zone.
' RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the Planning
` Commission continue Conditional Use Permit.No. 31 to its
regularly scheduled meeting of January 9, 1990. .
REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS
None
STAFF COMMENTS
General Plan Update
Commissioner Kanka (Award for Service)
Liiscussion On Future Market Place
PUBLIC ORALS
COMMISSION ORALS
ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
January 9 1990, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall Council
Chambers, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California.
DISK 56:AGENDAl1
,,
<
. ��^-'°"-°.�----'' -
„. �. _„�,
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
' PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA
y. , TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1989
, OPENING CEREMONIES �
A. Call to Order
The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City
of Lynwood was called to order by Chairperson Dove on the
above captioned date at 7:35 p.m., in the Council Chambers
of Lynwood City Hall, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California
90262.
B. Pledae of Alleaiance
Commissioner Willis led the Pledge of Allegiance.
' C. Roll Call of Commissioners
Chairperson Dove requested the roll call, and Mr. Barfield i
- complied.
Present: Commissioner Lena Cole-Dennis
Commissioner ponald A. Dove
Commissioner CarZton McMiller
Commissioner Jamal Muhsin
' Commissioner Roy Pryor
Commissioner David J. Willis
Commissioner John K. Haynes �
' Also �
Present: Aubrey D. Fenderson, Planning Manager
, - Vicente L. Mas, Community Development Director
Emilio M. Murga, Assistant City Engineer
Deborah Lewis, Civil Engineering.ASSistant
Arthur Barfield, Planning Associate
Joy Valentine, Minutes Clerk
Mr. Barfield and Chairperson Dove discussed Commissioner
. Haynes, who was in an adjoining room.
Approximately eighteen people were in the audience.
E. Certification of Agenda Postina
Mr. Barfield stated the agenda was posted per the Brown Act.
,
F. Approval oP Minutes I
- Chairperson Dove noted that, on page 7 of the August 8, (
1989, minutes, the vote was missing. Mr. Fendezson, who had
just walked in, stated that was an oversight that would be
corrected. There was a short discussion as to the outcome
of that vote.
i i
minutes7:disk7 , �
i
I I
� 1
MOTION by Commissioner Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner
:I?i�sin, to accept the August 28, 1989, minutes and the
, August 8, 1989, minutes as corrected.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissionrs Dove, Cole-Dennis, Haynes,
McMiller, Mushin, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
� ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Chairperson Dove stated he wanted the record to show that
Commissioner Haynes had arrived and the entire Commission was now
present.
' CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Tentative Parcel Man No. 15467 - Case No. 9(TPM 151
_ 11400 California Avenue (Reverend Dr. Charles Floyd)
Applicant requests approval'to consolidate five parcels into
two in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone.
Mr. Fenderson stated that Public Works Department removed
Condition No. 8, the payment of fees had been waived;
Condition No. 9, since the buildings have already been built,
grading is not necessary; and under Condition No. 15, subsec- .
tions b, reconstruction of damaged curb and gutter; c, recon-
struction of damaged pavement; d, construction of two wheel-
chair ramps, and e, installation of two marbelite street •
� lights.
Commissioner Haynes asked Mr. Fenderson if the.street lights
are not needed.
Mr. Fenderson replied that the City Council, at their last
meeting, had waived those requirements.
Mr. Murga stated that this is an old parcel map and the City
Council had taken this into consideration when granting the
waivers on fees and grading.
Mr. Mas stated the Public Works Department had used the
City's standard language to obtain a dedication of land to
widen the street. Since the City Council had waived the
dedication, under Condition No. 15, subsections b, c, d, and
e were not needed.
Commissioner Haynes again asked if the street lights are not
needed.
' Mr. Murga agreed that the street lights are needed, but the
City Council had decided,.since this is an old parcel map,
and since Caltrans may widen the street in the future, to
waive the street lights,
°� Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing.
minutes7:disk7
2
Dr. Charles Leonard Floyd, 3696 Cedar Avenue, Lynwood, rose
to say this project began five years ago. He stated the only
w♦:- r';Zad to come back to the City now is becaus� of a
simple eiror on the part of staff, they didn't sign off the
parcel map,in August 1983. He apologized to the neighbors to
his church for the long time they have had to suffer with the
� problems associated with construction.
Dr. Floyd spoke of his problems with the FDIC and the Savings
and Loan mess and his attempts to resolve the matter with
FDIC Attorney Zayer.
Commissioner Haynes asked Dr. Floyd why he went to the City
Council before coming to the Planning Commission.
Dr. Floyd stated that his attorney wanted to get Harold C.
Williams (the City Engineer at tht time) or Joseph Wang (the
present City Engineer and Assistant City Engineer at that
time) to take care of the matter. Dr. Floyd further stated
he had spent $3,000 with a civil engineer to get new plans so
' he could take them to the City Council and get everything •
over with. Also, prior to the City Council meeting, he and
, his attorney had considered a lawsuit against.the City.
Dr. Floyd continued, the present City staff wants him to give
the City 10' off his front property and 7' off the sides, he
won't do that. He understood that Caltrans was supposed to
take care of the widening of the street.
Chairperson Dove asked if the present lot configuration is
the same as it was in 1983.
Dr. Floyd stated it is identical.
Chairperson Dove thanked Dr. Floyd and asked if there was
anyone present wishing to speak in favor of the proposal.
There was no one.
Chairperson Dove then asked if anyone present wished to speak
against the proposal.
Mrs. Reese, 3540 Mulford Avenue, Lynwood, rose to state she
lives 1/2 block from the project. She and her neighbors have
waited for seven years and now there are two, two-story
shells of buildings with no doors and no windows. Vagrants
are always sleeping there, the neighbors hear vagrants fight-
ing there at 3:00 a.m., causing lots of police activity. The j
church is covered with graffiti and surrounded by dead bush-
es. Mrs. Reese stated she doubts if the church has any
active congregation holding services. Mrs. Reese stated that '
_ she and her neighbors no longer have the peaceful enjoyment
of their homes. Now Dr. Floyd is being given another two
' years and the possibility of three one-year extensions if the
� Planning Commission approves this Tentative Parcel Map. Mrs.
Reese complained that the neighborhood just can't afford
this. She requested disapproval of the Tentative Parcel map
and abatement required on the property. Or, if the Commis-
sion wants to approve, just give Dr. Floyd one year finish
the project.
• Chairperson Dove asked Mr. Barnes if this could be done. �
minutes7:disk7
I
3 I
' � Mr. Barnes replied that extentions are not discretionary, the
law grants three possible extentions.
,�,? .:onE't �� r;�_:n� asked Dr. Floyd if the conditi�ns_ are as
stated by Mrs. Reese.
Dr. Floyd stated that actually the conditions are worse.
: Example, five to six homeless men sleep in the buildings. He
stated he needs the FDIC to help, and, instead, the FDIC is
, trying to take the property away from him to give to St.
Emydius Church. St. Emydius Church wants to build a youth
' center there.
Dr. Floyd stated that there is an active congregation that
meets every Wednesday evening at 7:00 p.m. and he invited all
, .
present to join them.
� Dr. Floyd stated the buildings had once been 93$ complete,
beautifully painted, carpeted, and a new roof. He said the �
man who took the windows is now in jail. Dr. Floyd added
that he can drive the Commissioners around the neighborhood
and show them his doors which are now being used by his
neighbors.
Dr. Floyd stated he has spent over $100,000 in legal fees and
the FDIC is now charging his church $341 every day in
interest.
• Commissioner Willis stated his concern about taking any
, action since the City Council has already acted.
Mr. Barnes stated Dr. Floyd tried to bypass the Commission by
keeping the old tentative parcel map and not applying for a
new parcel map. He said the Commissioners can reimpose the
waived conditions or require new conditions.
Chairperson Dove stated he didn't want to continue the
• present conditions, he wanted to take an action that would
" make a positiive contribution to the neighborhood.
�. Commissioner Haynes stated his concerhs are with Mrs. Reese
and her neighbors. He questioned how fast the church
administration will complete the project if the Commission
gives its approval again. He asked how fast the doors and
windows will be replaced. Further, Commissioner Haynes
� - questioned if the graffiti will be removed. He stated his
aversion to continuing in the same situation for another
year.
Commissioner Pryor asked why a tentative parcel map is
required for a church.
Mr. Mas replied that it is now five separate parcels of land
, and the five lots need to be made into two lots, the church
can then sell one. The development is across property lines
- and a easement is needed for a parking lot.
Commissioner Pryor commented that Dr. Floyd has spent so much
money for legal fees, couldn't some of the money be used to -
clean up the property., After all; he added this is a church.
minutes7:disk7
4
- Mr: Mas stated the applicant cannot go ahead with
construction and will have to go back to the City Council if
t: ,.>�? � }!, j y;c�missian ,'-.:.oesxa't grant the permit. Refusal
to approve only extend the present situation. The City
Council will probably initiate abatement procedures, Mr. Mas
added.
Dr. Floyd replied that he has legal problems with the FDIC.
'' The (FDIC) has been in Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings and
are now in Chapter 7. The FDIC appraised the property at
$375,000. Dr. Floyd said he asked to buy it at that price
and the FDIC attorney said the property isn't for sale at any
' price. Dr. Floyd stated he doesn't want to put anymore money
into the property because the FDIC won't give the property to
' his church.
Commissioner Cole-Dennis asked Dr. Floyd if a fence would
• help.
, Dr. Bloyd replied that he is cutting a contract with
Community Development to lease the property for fifteen years,
� and yes, a fence would help. He stated his contractor won�t
take any money until a fence is up. He said there had once
been a fence, even the fence had been stolen.
Chairperson Dove stated the clock won't start running until
Dr. Floyd gets word from the'FDIC.
Dr. Floyd stated he is due in court on December 4, 1989, with
the FDIC. He plans to win even if he has go to to
Congressman Gonzalez. He told the Commissioners that had
this tentative tract map been filed in 1983, when he still �
had money, the work would have been done. He stated he
didn't know the map hadn't been filed until 1986.
� Commissioner Pryor stated he didn't understand, if Dr. Floyd
had money in 1983, why didn't he finish?
Dr. Floyd said there was very little left to be done, the i
work was 93� finished, then the Orange Coast Thrift and Loan
Company folded. He stated he now has two companies who will
loan money:to his church. He said the original reason for
: changing the five lots into two was to separate religious and
commercial buildings, he said he would be glad to settle
with the FDIC, then will secure the building, pick up the
garbage, etc.
: Commissioner Willis asked Dr. Floyd if he will clean the
property weekly while waiting for the legal matters to
settle.
� Dr. Floyd said he now has a man living in the center house,
_ and he will have a trash bin brought in to help with the
' cleanup.
Chairperson Dove asked Dr. Floyd if the law enforcement
people have been helpful and Dr. Floyd replied in the
- affirmative. Dr. Floyd said the drug dealers are still
selling on his corner, but this is because the sheriff .
Department can't have people there twenty-four hours a day. I
.�r.--- -..'---._
' minutes7:disk7
, • ,
5 . �
I
, • (
Chairperson Dove asked for a motion.,
C' , �� ;_- < � �!� '�`*: +- � • - _ ` '- : : ::�olution could be amended
to requite an i-mmediate cleanup and weekly cleanups
thereafter. .He further asked if Dr. Floyd could be required
. to return to the Commission in 30 days to report on any
progress.,
Mr. Barnes stated that the cleanup is really a Code
Enforcement matter, after all, this is not a CUP but a TPM,
and it is also inappropriate to require Dr. Floyd to report
to:the Commission. However, both an immediate cleanup and
weekly cleanups can be required.
Mr. Barnes suggested adding Condition No. 18 that the
property must be immediately cleaned and properly maintained
until construction is completed.
MOTION, by Commissioner Haynes, SECONDED by Commissioner
Pryor, to adopt Resolution No. 2289, "A RESOLUTION OF TAE
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 15467 TO COMBINE PARCELS 9, 10, 11,
12, AND 13 INTO TWO LOTS 362 AND 363 OF TRACT NO. 2551 MB
24-78-80 PER MAP RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY," subject to the stated'
conditions and requirements, adding Condition No. 18, the
property must be immediately cleaned and property properly
�aintained until construction is completed, and certifying
that the project is categorically exempt from the provisions
of the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended by Section 15061
b(3).
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioner pove, Cole-Aennis, Haynes,
McMiller, Muhsin, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION by Commissioner Haynes, SECONDED by Commissioner
Willis, to require that Dr. Floyd must return to the next
regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission on
November 14, 1989, to report on any progress which had been
made.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Cole-Dennis, Haynes,
McMiller, Muhsin, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: AFane
ABSTAIN: None
'' minutes7:disk7
6 .
. G '
Mr. Mas requested permission from the Commission to leave,
stating he was ill. Chairperson Dove gave him permission to
. i�:...-.RJp., � ..
NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS
2. TENTAIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 21626 - CASE NO 10 (TPM 101
12203 Long Beach Boulevard (Ahn and Han Architects)
Applicant requests approval to consolidate two parcels into
one in the C-2A (Medium Commercial) zone.
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing.
James Noh, 4018 179th Street, Torrance, California, 90050
rose to represent the applicant.
He stated the applicant eventually plans to build a mall with
, a grocery store, laundry, two more shops and sufficient
parking. .
Their being no one else wishing to speak in favor of, or in
opposition to the proposal, Chairperson Dove closed the
Public Hearing. .
MOTION by Commissiorier Pryor, SECONDED by Commissioner
Muhsin, to adopt Resolution No. 2297, "A RESOLUTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 21626 TO COMBINE IATS 1024 AND 1025 .
OF TRACT NO. 3025 MB 35-43 AND 44 PER MAP RECORDED IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY," subject ,
to the stated conditions and findings and certifying that the
project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the
State CEQA Guidelines, as amended by Section 15061 b(3).
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Cole-Dennis, Haynes,
McMiller, Muhsin, Pryor, Willis °
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
3. Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 23 (CUP 231
Corner Fernwood and Birch Streets (Carlos Roman Pineda)
,Applicant requests approval to develop six two-story
, townhouse dwellings in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential)
�,zone.
Mr. Barfield discussed the high percentage of land devoted to
landsc`aping and distributed a letter that had been received
from resident Lillie Kummerfeld, who opposes the development.
minutes7:disk7
�
i
7
` �
,
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing.
� �- �i n c, � �... _,
.� � W3.111 � S^ „ .,. _ . � ". 3 � � �:i ... -'1]WOOCl
California, 90262,.representing Carlos Pineda�, rose state
their acceptance of all conditions.
A discussion ensued between staff and Commissioners about the
attached maps as to number of units (four versus six) and the
mattes was resolved when Mr. Fenderson put the correct map up
on the bulletin board and discussed same. There is a total
of fourteen parking spaces, two more than required.
', There being no one else wishing to speak in favor of, or in
opposition to the proposal, Chairperson Dove closed the
Public Hearing.
There was short discussion about Condition No. 29, that a.
paroel map may be required later. Commissioner Pryor was
concerned because of the lack of a parcel map now but Mr.
Barnes stated this is legally correct. -
MOTION by Commissioner McMiller, SECONDED by Commissioner
Cole=Dennis, to adopt Resolution No. 2294, "A RESOLUTION OF
' THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 23 (CUP 23) FOR TAE CONSTRUCTZON
OF SIX (6), TWO-STORY TOWNHOUSES AND ONE (1) TWO-STORY
TOWNHOUSE TRIPLEX AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FERNWOOD AND
BIRCH STREETS, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA, IN THE R-3 (MULTIPLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ) ZONE," subject to stated conditions and
requirements and certifying that the project is categorically
exempt from the provisions of State CEQA guidelines, as
amended by Section 15061 b(3).
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Dove, Cole-Dennis, McMiller,
Muhsin, Pryor, Willis
NOES: Commissioner Haynes
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
5. Conditional Use Permit - Case No 25 (CUP 251 �
10733-10749 Long Beach Boulevard (Oscar O. Aparicio)
Applicant requests approval to develop a 21,000 sq. ft auto
center in the C-2A (Medium-Commercial) zone. ,
Mr. Fenderson informed the Commissioners that problems had
arisen at the Site Plan Review meeting and modifications and
revision of the proposed plans must be made before this item
can be brought before the Commission. Therefore, staff .
requests that this item be continued to the next regularly
scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission on November 14,
1989.
MOTION by Commissioner Cole-Dennis, SECONDED by Commissioner
Willis, to continue Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 25 (CUP
25) to the next regu2arly scheduled meeting of the Planning
Commission to be held on November 14, 1989.
_�.�n�_ . - -
minutes7:disk7
8 . •
� ,
MOTION carried by the following vote:
AYES:, Commissioners Dove, Cole-Dennis, McMiller,
Muhsin, Pryor, Willis
NOES: Commissioner Aaynes
ABSE2IT: None
ABSTAIN: None
6. Variance Case No. 3(VAR 3)
3654 Imperial Highway (Elias Ayoub)
'_ Applicant requests approval to construct a ten (l0) foot high
monument sign in the HI4D (Hospital, Medical, Dental) zone.
Mr. Fenderson defined a"pole sign" as a sign that has
. airspace between the ground and the sign, and a"monument
sign" as a'sign that has no space between the ground and the
sign (monolithic).
� Mr. Fenderson stated he went to the site last week and talked
with Mr. Ayoub, who told him he had spent so much money on
the building that he needs a larger sign than permitted by
- City Code. Mr. Fenderson stated that the lot doesn't qualify
for a monument sign.
Chairperson Dove asked how high the bottom of the pole sign
would be from ground level and if a pole sign could be used.
� Mr. Fenderson replied that Mr. Ayoub can't have a pole sign,
the lot doesn't.qualify and besides, a pole sign couldn't be
seen. Staff suggests a sign on the building, this would be
� aesthetically pleasing and visible.
Chairperson Dove opened the Public Hearing.
Elijah Salem, 9330 Pecan, Cypress, California, 90630,
representing the applicant, rose to state that two signs were
present on the building (one on the roof) when construction
started. Now the building has been extensively remodeled.
The lot is narrow and the owner wants a monument sign ten
, feet high, two feet wide by. two feet, twisted slightly in the
northeast corner of the lot. (Think of Washington Monument).
He needs this particular sign because of present high
buildings and present signage of two neighbors. He merely
wants to identify the doctor's building. The owner does not
. want a sign on his building, wants a separate monumnet sign
ten feet liigh. •
Mr. Fenderson stated that a monument sign ten feet high would
be disproportional and small trees should be planted in that
spot. He asked Mr. Salem if Mr. Ayoulr is getting funding
from the City.
Mr. salem replied that Mr. Ayoub is trying to get money from
the City but it has not yet beea determined that he will.
� minutes7:disk7
. 9
Mr. Fenderson stated that staff has offered various
alternatives, but Mr. Ayoub has remained adamant that he has
to have a ten-foot monur.aetri; si��i�. s:�' r•�:`: �..�.:ygested
' perhaps a projection sign attached on ,one side to the
building, which is not acceptable to Mr. Ayoub. Mr. Ayoub
' wants his sign to be equal to those of the chiropractor and
gynocologist signs next door, and , in order to do this, the
sign must be a monument sign ten feet high.
Mr. Barnes stated that there has to be something unusual
about the applicant's property, not his neighbors' property, ,
to qualify for a variance. The signs present on his
, neighbors' property do not qualify as something unusual
because the unusual condition must stem from his particular
- piece of property.
Commissioner Haynes commented that it is an unusual
circumstance when a sign isn't visible from one side.
' Mr. Salem stated that the building is twelve-foot high, and
they might accept an eight-foot monument sign, but the ten-
foot would be better.
, Mr. Barnes suggested this item should be continued to the
next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission
so photographs can be brought to show the Commissioners. He
stated this had deteriorated into a negotiating session and
negotiations should be done at the staff level, and before
the item reaches the Commission.
Dr. Ayoub stated he wants approval right now, he is moving this
weekend and will need the sign.
- Chairperson Dove stated the sign couldn't be build fast enough to
be there this weekend regardless of hat the Commission does, and
Dr. Ayoub agreed.
MOTION carried by the following vote:
,' AYES: Cominissioners Dove, Cole-Dennis, Haynes
McMiller, Muhsin, Pryor, Willis
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
STAFF COMMENTS
' Mr. Fenderson stated that all elements for the new General Plan
should have been received by staff by October 17, 1989. Staff
should then be able to schedule a Public Hearing soon. He
expects to present the new General Plan to the Planning
Commission in February 1990 and then the City Council should
approve same in March 1990.
Commissioner Pryor commented that this should be well-publicized
so that the public will be sure to know about the proposed
• changes.
minutes7:disk7
10
Commissioner Haynes stated he realizes staff is undermanned,
still he wants Commissioner Cole-Dennis' Public Notification
Program completed.
Mr. Fenderson commented that he has limited personnel at present,
- but work is proceeding on the Public Notification Program.
Mr. Barfield stated he is researching plague companies, should
have s,omething at the next meeting for Commissioner Kanka.
Commissioner Haynes thanked him for his diligence. �
PUBLIC ORALS
There was none.
COMMISSION ORALS
Commissioner Cole-Dennis asked what happened to the missing
minutes and Mr. Fenderson replied that their clerk typist
returned from vacation and quit. Commissioner Haynes agreed that
the minutes should be brought to the Planning Commission. The
, minutes clerk stated she had delivered all minutes prior to this
meeting to the City of Lynwood.
At this time, a discussion about Code Enforcement: Possibility
of getting funds to hire a secretary and another Code Enforcement
Officer approved by the City Council; possibility of turning the
Code Enforcement responsibilities over to Los Angeles County;
possibility of contracting with Los Angeles County; the large
number of unanswered and unenforced Code Enforcement complaints,
giving some complaints to the County Health Department if they
can be considered sanitation complaints. Commissioner Pryor
asked about automobiles on front yards and yard sales on weekends
and Commissioner Willis replied those wouldn't be handled by the
County Health Department.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION was made by Commissioner to adjourn
to the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission on
November 14, 1989, SECONDED by Commissioner ,
and carried unanimously. the meeting was adjourned at
' 10:�.m.
minutes7:disk7
11
i�,- ,
!�'> .
� ,
,�� <'. °
�' .�
y _R�_...,, . . .
4�e.' ... .. . . �
•�
"" APPROVED AS WRITTEN this lOth day of October, 1989.
i
��;�.�. � . .
�' Donald A. Dove, Chairperson'
�`' '
� "�`
�' ATTEST: APPROVE AS TO FORM:
�rx - . . . � . .
fi,+�w...� . ,.
�?Y . . , . . . .
C;t.
y, -.
j„`j :.�� . .
� �. Aubrey D. Fenderson, Manager pouglas D. Barnes
; Planning Department Deputy City Attorney
s;%:�
,„, . .
. e'
+`
r '`
7��� � . . . - . �
3: .
�;�'�� '_ _ . '
t:
s. �„ i .
:� ;
"�ti��. • � � -
(fY S
r=* .
?R c�.
.
� �;
c.e � .
�x:�r
y •
�.
�} ,
r
j '
�'
�
k
�K�
�` '
R�..
� .�
�
�
{j� �
�€�
..� f
��
��..�:. , ' ,
�� .
i� disk59:sigpage
�f'=.
:�,'
,� .-
''N. . Y
_ ):
,� DATE: December 12, 1989 ti��P4��� I`�-1r1 IVO. �
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION �AS� IeO. � � �� =
FRONI: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Case No. 25
Applicant: Oscario Aparicio
PROPOSAL:
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to develop a
auto service center approximately 21,000 sq.ft. in size at
10733-10749 Long Beach Boulevard in the C-2A (Medium Commercial)
zone.
FACTS•
1. Source of Authoritv
Section 25-16.15 of the Lynwood Municipal Code requires that
a Conditional Use Permit be obtained in order to operate any
business with respect to automobile uses. .
2. Property Location
The subject pioperty consists of two lots on the west side of
Long Beach Boulevard south of Martin Luther King (Century
Boulevard).
3. Propertv Size
The subject property measures 172.89 feet on its northern
perimeter, 246.17 feet on its southern perimeter 202.88 feet
on its western perimeter; the total area is approximately
39,505 sq.ft. or .91 acres in size.
4. Bxistina Land Use
There is a 2,200 square foot building used as an office and ,
work bay. The surrounding land uses are as follows:
North - Commercial East - Commercial
South - Commercial West - Residential !
5. Land Use Description '
i
The General Plan designation for the subject property is �
Commercial, and the zoning classification is C-2A (Medium •
Commercial). The surrounding land uses are as follows: j
General Plan: Zoning: �
North - Commercial North - C-2A �
South - Commercial South - C-2A
i
East - Commercial East - C-2A�
West - Multi-Family West - R-3 �
DZSK 28:Case No. 25
i
i
i
1 �
i
`•6. Proiect Characteristics:
l The applicant proposes to develop three two story buildings
- � to serve as an auto center providing auto repair, auto
retail,. offices auto/retail storage.. There is sufficient
'�;.` r � ,:a--- �,:-- .=- -^--._._, .,,.„� _ 15.3 percent
of the properry is landscaped . Auto body work and painting
will not be conducted on the site.
7. Site Plan Review
At its regular meeting on October 26, 1989, the Site Plan
Review Committee evaluated the proposed development and
recommended approval to the Planning Commission, subject to
specific conditions and requirements.
8. Zoninq Enforcement Historv
Resolution No. 794 (Case No. 81076) was.approved October 13,
1989 for the subject site; and, a letter was sent to the
applicant from Code Enforcement on February 14, 1989 regard-
ing permit requirements. (See Attached)
9. NeiQhborhood Response
None of record. �
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSTION:
1. Consistencv with General Plan
The proposed land use is consistent with the existing zoning
classification.
2. Site Suitabilitv
The property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
proposed development relative to structures, parking, walls,
fences, landscaping, driveways and other development features
required by the Zoning Ordinance.
Long Beach Boulevard is a major arterial and is well suited
to carry the quantity of traffic the proposed development
would generate.
3. Compatibility
I
The proposed development is surrounded by a mixture of i
commercial developments; therefore, the project will be ,
compatible with the surrounding land uses. ;
I
4. Compliance with Develooment Standards �
i
The proposal meets the development standards required by the ;
Zoning Ordinance with respect to setbacks; lot coverage; I
building height and density.
5. Conditions of Approval j
The improvements as proposed, subject to the conditions �
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have �
a negative effect on the values of the surrounding properties �
or interfere with or endnager the public health, safety or �
welfare. �
�
'
DISK28:Case No. 25 i
2 �
i
�
I
�
• ._ .,
_ .6. Benefits to Communitv
• The proposal will assist in upgrading the commercial use of
the property and support the Commercial designation of the
� ,;i:32 �� ?�:1 P.'�. ,-. ,
' 7. Enbironmental Assessmer�i
The staff has found.that no substantial environmental impact
will result from the proposed development; therefore, a
Negafive Declaration has been prepared and is on file in the
Community Development Department and in the office of the
� City Clerk.
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff respectfully requests that after consideration the
Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2296:
1. Finding that Conditional Use Permit No. 25 will not
have a significant effect on the environment, and
certifying the Negative Declaration as adequate.
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit No. 25, subject to
the stated conditions a»d requirements.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 794 (Case No. 81076) and letter, Code
Enforcement. �
2. Location Map
3. Resolution No. 2296
4. Site Plan
, '
DISK 28:Case No. 25
3
�. ......:.._..:�.....� _. ..... ..__ .... _ _�. _ _ .... _. , ....... .. . �. ._..
� --- , . _ __...
,, , �;
._,.
� .
,
LOCA1'ION iVIAP
_ . ,� ______.
». _
i e A � ).is
` . ' N p Qp . ' , • . . �o.' B" �o' �ro r ... �
�a° n �e. �1 n3� "� as " 10 �o ' �o �o . •
. � � ea yo Z ` . � �
.s a is .,v. , se - i .� L� i/J� a ��� s� � �i � i n :� ` r� r . a� a{� ar �� Y .
'. ' a w �,ya - � ^0 M � '� M r� � � � � �' ,
--• " ro� ro - (.�I `� o'
. � �L✓NWO00 C/TY Bp�/N0.1AY g - ...
�"c�t/'7 � .,
����.
, . OJ )0 IS � 0 97 SO � ' 9 , !� � `
- ai� . n � % ' . ' � IJ7e� 70010 �W � ' TJ/ � � .
. �� �/o�i�� � w �ev �moa � , o ' w ' io�� \ � �y � 7a � �' I � O ( I II ,� � I .
.W J 'ro�rxJ .� m � d0 M`� b Mzf 1t.
.. . y /bi/ 'vz �' 9. a: iov a �D�l O � �� � m � . MI M�� i � M . -
� � i I �
• . ' � ai �io�aoe � . s - av
`° ➢ , � � a8 � --�—
•io9� e . o p �� ie�� „ lo �.
7 � � / _1 ,�' / i .
" 'i o
• e. / • a� dz �,� lo��t`j s e �z M P M � io
m �
. '/o)JUI ^ .'< fo .;�� ;, �� �\ n I �y M' M M J� �
� J�� � �y M M M M �.
' �
. � io � � o is . T ' : � \ c.a s� s� . n' , �
,4da :.. �?)��,�.,,, . .. .
- y a l) A 1 AC A . . . .
0' U . ��o�v b >,?>:::::.:<::�:>.'<::::<:`.::::: a �
�1 i, ro :.:'f:::?::!. $ o � i� i< zz az u - .
io t,::: 3;.Y9:: {��
�„;�':;:<.'««»;«<s,, ( � Q o �, �} �q
/7 . �o •/0l5_ p10 � � I�Yq��i �� n'1 �^'j �` IT�It .
i� �� 7 . 8`i �g °. II M !'� m � .
r : : `� . :',':. `.::.
�IO `6'• ) iei � '/ 27 �..'I � h try�3i`� I ISI 0 �
s a; b� � �
� N • � � �i ._ ;. ioSe� N j8�� � , . � � fir ,w . ,
c ' � ; � "�
. . . �roi �� � ' 2 76 /o�G • `� � a� / 08/ � �� oy� 7 . � o , ._.
. 77 77, ��� ��_ . (a . . I
� ' M• 7 / N.l!%J:lPN 7/ ro 8r 9 , I° s � ' � I� M �'1 0. 1
Je�o�)o .
.� ' 0 � 1D /uq a"1/ o � y?� m� M M � ..... .
, f �
] p M� M
lo
, _
�
M
M
. 6s o —��F , .,. .
, — � 1_ o �
ie , ai . � o
� �
- . �O N N I
)) — 07- � 1 .. .. .
� I
Q 3]/
• . °Q :° 3 ^ ±L.Lt%o� - xt o — � pp�l . ac � s� .
' . aJ , es � e1y •^ . . r� � CUTAB£7N -
� p � 0 V
.. �IO�y ', __e�� 7J 10) �Q�. b io73/ ` 4� t1 g �.s�� g sa �
ae x
. ' '� � � , �z 9� 77 � �9.1 . e�,'I—iF7'7",re�°(�,-r— �. p \ M . �� �• :
� � o .+'°; o s oqo tr , � �.
° ' ..v . � � I �' lnvs-i u I �� . , s •� J 6 a
,.. - � na J➢ .j PCUMA ' • y� ' � ('�1 MY .
�o o'' � �. � �� �vcaue �. x °' g. ��� m' I M�.
i�' c z . w a 4 W a�' .� � i� . , ivo
� � /D p' se� i, o, . o .se � `l I�' ��E' ��M �„\, a �p S' �Q'�Ib i.s , �,
Z ,. c, sJ ., ., - ,9 � qaa , :
' S ' � ; , g , � � � al I I���-?�-� (o y � h o �' I
i.ii6 � f�i nF�7_.�i � '_ �6 a� , j� � ._�� ��8 il� j � � `� ��� 3p o ° �M n , ` ' •���
J.��I� i io_43.� in4 . M "'��i ; ��,
„
I
-
,
I
. V ,
� � I
N I
� J �'
�l(-
I
, � . i
� � r.
`..�,.,� _ y , ` i �:
�,
i
w,rs .. ' i .. . � .� ,� . y f
N y « ..i�' . ^ . . "
�� ��tY � �YNwoon „�
�� �
,,
a �,.w.K, ���.
��`'�,`��:, . �'�I�'� �1 Ctty vUeettng CkaQQenges � � � � � �
� �i' �' .. .
� r � � . N330 BULUS ROAD
�" � "'� LYNWOOD, CALIFOiiNIA 90262
xF :y * ,+ ". .
� �'aA+ (213) 603•0220 ,
r �,j;
KF:..
�4:i
�� C'. .
��'•�
�'t. ..
Y " February 14, 1989
���;� �r
��:�.i... . �
�:. .
�:
'i�.
;x �Mr. Oscar Ofilio Aparicio
10749 Long Beach Blvd.
:'' Lynwood, CA 9 ----...,-
W, , —�, ,
�. `,
�� ..
r�? RE: 10733 - 10749 Loncr Beach Blvd.
�;
��.'' ar Mr. Aparicio: �
�,r
'' On January 27, 1980 the Fire Dept; Building Div. and Code
Enforcement Div. of the City of Lynwood conducted an inspection
''�' of the above mentioned property and the following violations were
�� found:
1. Trash enclosure needed- Lynwood Municipal Code, Section 21-�38 ;,
� MUST OBTAIN PROPER PERMITS form Planning and Building �
Divisions.
2. Two (2) metal containers used for storage of tires and fully
connected to electrical power without proper permit. Lynwood
� Zoning Code Section 25-9.1. MUST EITHER REMOVE OR OBTAIN A
TEMPORARY PERMIT from the �Planning Div. Electrical line
� connections MUST be removed AFTER you obtain a demolition
permit from the Building Div.
" 3. Inproper storage of tires (on top of inetal container,
scattered through out North/rear of the property. Lynwood
Municipal Code Section 21-38. This item was previously
discussed and agreed by you on the June 21, 1982 meeting with
Vicente L. Mas, Director of Community Development and was set
� as a condition for the issuance of CUP #$1076. MUST COMPLY ;
• WITH CUP REGULATIONS CONCERNING PROPER STORAGE/DISPOSAL OF 1
TIRES.
;:j
4. Dish antenna in office building without first obtaining proper ;�
permits from the Planning and Building Divs. Lynwood Zoning i
; Code Section 25-16.4 MUST OBTAIN PROPER PERMZTS. ,{
€:
,
>;
::a
�
=1
;
� ;
_.
;�
� � ;
u .' l . � �.�� � ,. i ., ::
J r �
f . . . . ' ..' _ . ': . ; .. ! .�
. : . .. :: : ��
..-. ... • ' • . . ��' .. i t ' . . . ..� . ...: :::
j )
� . . .. f ' •:#
' � '�
N �
X
.
� ,�
�:.: . . . " ' ' �. y ' . '
.. '' ... . . . , . . ' _ ; .. � . .. . ': : �'
. _ _:.. �
I ��
I ;
'. '. :. .. : :: ' ' . ' " ,
'
.:: ' . . . , l L
' '. . ' .. : �'• � �� � .
.
7 � � . . . . � ': .. '
' . ..� . ".- . �.. '. ....:' ...� � � .' .
��
'..... .. . . . . . . ..
�:
._._. ._.. . . .._ _ �1
�::�. �' ,
�� . � � ,
F� �, ' , , � �
, � i.
�� ••' �
�a�s�5; Upholstery shop being leased and operating without proper
�,��. license form the Gity. Lynwood Municipal Code Sectic�+ 17-23.
� ';: , MUST OBTAIN PROPER LICENSE.
t
� 6. Vending Machine at the site not properly licensed. L�.1,-=
�'.��,t, Section 17-31. MUST OBTAIN PROPER LICENSE. .
�'�� 7. Shrubery required per CUP issued is still not in place. MUST
COMPLY WITH CUP 81076 REQUIREMENTS.
���° ° , �
�'^s�'8. Per CUP mentioned above, point # 6 and per L.Z.C. Section 25-
�z�°' 8.5 ALL WORK ON CARS_WILL BE DONE INSIDE A BUILDING. Remove
� n,' � �
r temporary car hoist/vehicle work ramp from property or refrain
��"`_ ' from using.
�e r�, � � � � � �
9. Mike Tamaya currently leasing section of property to repair
� ` transmitions. NO LICENSE ON FILE. L.M.C. Section 17-23. Mr.
� Tamayo MUST OBTAIN PROPER LICENSE.
�" 10. Tires through out lot not properly screened off as directed in
t�;'' CUP. MUST COMPLY WITH•C.U.P. REQUIREMENTS.
�',
�:`i:�. 11. Fence in rear of lot should have been six feet high per C.U.P.
�;�+., , ermit in order to complete
,� . requirement. Obtain any necessary p
�i,;: .,
the fence per requirements.
�'; :' �
"' 12. Junk, trash and debris throucjh out entire lot. L.M.C. Section
r, ,,
21-38 ENTIRE LOT MUST BE CLEANED OUT AND MAINTAIN.
�;;; 13. 5anding of cars should be done in enclosed area in order to
�'� prevent particles from�littering residential area in rear.
L.Z.C. Section.25-9.1. �
, .
"' 14. License states only 2 employees at the site, however there
`�' were b employees at the site and you were not present. Current ,
x `'
4 °`� 7icense must have correct amount of employees. AMMEND
�.l'��',� . .. . �
CURRENT CITY LZCENSE.
�� �.�.`
.��� 15.. Numerous metal frame canopys through out lot without proper
N ;' .. permit. U.B.C. Section 301 a: MUST OBTAIN PROPER PERMIT OR
K, OBTAIN DEMOLITION PERMIT FROM BUILDING DIV.
16. Added front ,porch roof to the building used as an office.
U.B.C. Section 301 a. NO PERMIT ON FILE. (Same correction
�" notice as mentioned above.)
,�.
" 17. Wood patio structure to rear of office - NO PERMIT ON FILE.
`,, same correction as point number 15.
r� , E,. �
�^
, � :...
E; �
.. . . . • _ i � - ; ; _ ,:
,
` > S >
�
. .. . �. . . � .
;., .. . ' .. , , . . . � .. . A� i . ..;_ -. � �� X
i
X . .. _.._ . .. .. :. ,I: ;. :.
� �. •: � . �.-.. E .:: -:' -
. . � � � � �� y . .
. .� . �. .. . ., .t ..
. � � �� . �.. �.:.� ..
� t
� '. ' . .� . � . .:� '.:� . . ... . .'•.. .. i �' .��I� :( , ..�(�. i � .
. . . .. . � , ; _
"� .-.. . .:., � .. ' � . . � � (�: )� l
�+ �
'.f:i �. . . . . � _
� 4 . ., . ` � . . . .
�£ . ' f U �V . . , ',
� I:
� ^- • '�' `� �� ''�
g : '
�� � i . _, - � � . .
�s `18. Illegal ducting from stove in office kitchen to several rooms
��"°` in the back. ILLEGAL �:l�T BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY AFTER ,
, OBTAINING DEMOLITION PERMIT. I'
���`�'19. Rooms in office�being used as dwelling unit. ILLEGAL MUST BE ������,
�`��'� IbII�IEDIATELY STOPPED. Refrain from this use of property.
�°, ; �
�y'y20. In both bath - restroom area in the office buildinq showers ,
have been added. ILLEGAL NO PERMIT DEMOLITION OR PROPER PERMIT
�� � 'w. MUST BE OBTAINED.
� , . : � �
��;�21. Numerous electrical wires throughout the office area. ILLEGAL.
a�,�'• MUST OBTAIN PROPER PERMITS OR DEMOLITION.
.f t :.: . .. .
c� q� ., ,
22. Two toilets in enclosed room (plywood walls, on south side of
��� � office) ILLEGAL MUST OBTAIN DEMOLITION PERMIT.
�� 23. Zllegal wiring and added patio roof to rear of upholstery shop
with no permit on file. U.B.C. 301A MUST OBTAIN PROPER PERMIT i
�_'�'' OR DEMOLISH. �
�. .
k '
,;;.;„ 24..Converted room in upholstery shop. No Permits. Same action as
� ; above.
f ' �
� +r y,
.`:. 25. All fire extinguishers must be in place and properly
��'=. maintained per fire code.
�:`
��, note you have been given 30 days to bring up this properEy `
x �_4
; into compliance. A follow-up inspection will be conducted on March
�-� 17, 1989 to ensure proper compliance with the codes. Failure to
�°.:'';: .
..:.., comply will result in referral to the City Prosecutor for legal
4 �..�.....
n ,,�, abatement of the violations. Pursuant to the Lynwood Zoning Co e
�.`,;:' � if this violations are not abated C.U,P. (Conditional Use Permit')
� 81076 can be revoked,and your business license suspended.
"„�;'.
` Should you have any questions please feel free to contact me
;� Monday' through Friday 8:00 to 9:00 or 4:00 to 5:00 at (213) 603-
��.^0 0220 extension 321.
� �..� . �
�; , Respectfully;.
Praslne Martinez
Acting Code Enforcement Supervisor
cc: Vicente L. Mas, Director
'�r: Community Development Department
_`,`� Assistant Chief Schultz, Fire Department
�" ' George Bowden, Senior Building Inspector
Aubrey Fenderson, Planning Division
. � .
_ �
T , , '- . . ',-., . ' . ,. . •
� t � � .. . .. .. . ,. � . � . '
` ' . . . v . . . : . �. . �I
.
:' '. � � .._ .,... � .'::
y- . � .' .A . . ' ..
T. ' . �. � ..t �,., :
Y' � :�i . . -'.. / �. . . �.. ..', . .-
(^ ' .'... . ... . . .� • •
I �. :..,- .. . . . ' � ..
x . � . . . . : ' . .
CJ y . . , . , . ' y ;.
y
i.. . . .., ... � . . . , u� 1 .
' . . . ..: ,. a ' .
!
Y'^ . .. . '., � ..
n � ;
.. . . .'.. . ,. ... .
. . :.. ., l :. \ . ..::
.:. .. . . . . :. ' :. - . . .. . . :' . ':. ::)Y. ._.
r ., .. _
� ... , .. � . .,. .;�. . . , . , .::
i
r _ . � .. . .. Y � �
t t
r � . � �. � ' . . .
'
biU/b
. t' _� � ; `' �F.;
, �
`
RESOLUTION N0. 794
.
�" .
- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR THE OPERATION OP AN AUTOMOTIVE
REPAIR 6ARAGE, AUTOMOTIVE BODY_SHOP, AND USED ,
CAR BUSINESS' ON LOTS 3 AND 4, TRACT N0. 2794,_
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 10733 AND 10749 LONG BEACH
: BOULEVARD.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
pursuant to law, did, on �October 13, 1981, hold a public hearing
on the application for a Conditional Use Permit to aJlow the oper-
ation of an automotive repair garage, automotive body shop, and
used car business at the sub,�ect address;
WHEREAS, the Comm9ssion has carefully considered all
pertinent testimony offered in the case as presented at the public
hearing;
WHEREAS, the Planning Director has determined that no
substantiat adverse environmental impacts would result from the
proposed project, and has filed a Negative Declaration;
WHEREAS, the subject property is in the C-2A Zone; �
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission
of the City of Lynwood finds and concludes as follows:
- 1. 7hat the granting of the proposed Conditional Use
Permit will not adversely affect the Comprehensive
General Plan, as the subfect property is designated
as "Commercial" on the General P1an Map;
2. That the proposed locatlon of the conditional.use
is in accord with the ob,�ectives of the Zoning Ordinance
and the purpose of the zone in which the site is lo-
cated, as the proposed conditional use meets the mini-
mum gross floor area for use in the C2-A Zone, will- `1
be conducted within a building per the requiremen.ts
of the C2-A Zone, and is a permitted use in the C-2A
Zorre, provided a Conditional Use Permit is obtained; �;;
3. That the proposed location of the Conditional Use and ;I
the conditions under which 1t would be operated or ':i
maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, �
s.afety, or welfare, or materially 1n,jurious to proper-
ties or improvements in the vicinity;
4. That the proposed Conditional Use will comply with q
each of the applicable provlslons of the Zoning Ordi- ,�
nance as stated in the conditions below;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of '-�
the City of Lynwood approves the appllcation for a Conditional Use
Permit to allow the operation of an automotive repair garage, auto-
motive body shop (with spray paint booth), and used car business
at 10733 and 10749 Long Beach Boulevard, provided the fo7lo�ving con-
ditions are met aiithin six (6) months of the date of the issuance of
the Conditional Use Permit in accordance �vith a phased schedule to ;�
be developed by the Planning Director:
.. . 'F1 . . � ' � `�
�.- '�:.. . ; 81076
d. , , . ' � . . � ��. ` — � �: . � .
� r .,.. . .. ' . .
SF; ,^ . . . . . . .
� � - . . . . . . .:
y�
r'
fi . '
'" . ' � ' . � :
� E' .. • . . . . .
Y. G,g . . . . . .
�.�"' . . \ . � . .
� ' . . . . .
'��=w'�� 1. That al1 automottve work be performed wholly within
;r ; the existing buil.dings or spray paint booth; ��
�. 2. That a masonry wall of six feet (6') 1n height be con-
��° structed atong the common boundary af the sub3ect proper-
=4:
ty and the abutting residential property to the rear;
° 3.. That .the existing fire extinguisher be serviced;
�.
' 4. That an approved extinguishtng system be provided in
r- the spray booth;
os.
5.. That all debris be removed from the property, both in
" , the front yard and in'the.rear;
„ `- _
a`:w: 6. That :all overgrown grass and weeds be removed from the
�.r parking lot at the front oP the property;
�* ''; 7. That all disabled vehicles be remaved from the property;
�,,_ �
�;; .' 8. That all campers/house trailers be removed from the
� property;
1
,�;�_ 9. That the dirt piles at the rear of the,property be '
removed;
��'��� � � � �
, 10. That irrigated landscaping such as trees and shrubs be
� provided in the area at the front of the property,
between the two (2) driveways and at the front of the
lat;
�``r il. That seven (7) customer parking spaces be marked on the
,:�:,; � .
pavem,ent and that they be provided with wheel stops;
�:�-' 12. That the sub�ect property be used solely for an auto-
"`�" mobile bod sho with s ra
a y p p y paint booth, automotive,
Y . repair garage, and a used car sales business per plans
'� submitted, conditions imposed, and future approved modi-
%�� fdcations thereto;
r �� /� '
�' 13. That a11 necessary permits and licenses be obtained �
- prior to operation at this location;
14. That all Lynwood Municipal Code and Zoning Ordinance ,
requirements be met:
15. That all signs be repaired or upgraded to satisfaction
��'� , of the Department of Community Development; -
r` 16. That all required bonds for off-site improvements
., (water mains, fire -hydrants, curbs, gutters, sidewalks,
` etc.) be submltted prior to issuance of building per-
'���� � mits� � � .
r, ..
s��- - 17. That the Conditional Use Permit shall lapse and become
� void if operation does not commence within one (1)
;i,.`,,;, ,. ,
a.,=•. • year from the date of approval.
;. - ,
:�z^ , , . . . -
F
:°:..'� � � • .
=;v.'f�.. _ . . .
?"t.-... �� .. . - .
,'=Y. ,_. . . . .
Y .
�� { s � ,
ri :'.
Ytr � . ' � ' � i's
� ,
��
ka
�"i: ':j:r �..
A . . � � . : c�
�h� fia
�` r"'�, � _
i:ti.'� . ' " . . . ..
�< .
`� �,,�� i . � � � .. � � .� �� �1<..!' .. ..
.M1. ' . �i �� � . .
�. �
II
Y a ,..
� .
14��; . , � ,. ' .
�y �
�� .. . . . � . .
p �
4 KO�LL CA�L. AYES' �ead,SRaymond,D�obtiinsrrera, Kanka,
��� ,
w� . ,
�"`�� NOES: 'lone
� ��
�, �,
ti� . � � � � � � � � � �
���` � pBSENT: Commissioner Pryor �
��.
�� .,
��,, _ -
,� -- _ .�. _
��' qpPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of October, 198 .
� .
� •
�� �
g ;
�+' '
w„ t � G-. ��—
,,., ".
��; . Cha erson
��a: .
y�:
;�: a:� .
�` �� ppproved as to form:
`�'� ` Approved as to Content
�' : ° '
�� Y w
�fl ^'
�- � �� t Yea er, Assistant City Attorney
�'�� Sece ary E. Kur 9
�1� " Char es G. Gomez,
„v:., , . . . . �
(
���5�"F._. �. . . � . , . .
:*�;=._� � � � ' �
�,`,'l. , _.
;aw-�=. � �, � � . �
� .
�,��, ,�., .. - ------__ - .. . .
° Attachments:
I r,.,,, � �
'�`�' Application � ` ' �
�,-> r �
'' Plo Plan
'� Resolution
„s
:M; •
°v.; .
��"? :, �--
'�:� � � � ��
,�;'- . � � �
,.�Y r:
.£. �
`� 'X .
1�
.S *
�*
.
�t. .�
i-
� w�.t'`' ' . .
03 a ��
1,..r '
3'.f -. I
a ��: � . . . I.
.^�, r _ . , .. . . , . " . .
' ,
'°' �. . . . � :
_
� "
.3s�`-
�g� � .
f>
r ' ^ S'�` "� . . . :��
(
x . . . . . -.�. �� -� �.
{_ .. ' ' ' .. . . . .. . ... t . f...
� � `
RESOLUTION NO. 2296
'.' A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
•' THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 25 FOR AN AUTO CENTER IN THE C-2a
(MEDIUM COMMERCIAL) ZONE, AT 10733 - 10749
_ IANG BEACH BOULEVARD, LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA.
, WHEREAS,. the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject
application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent
' testimony offered at the public hearing; and
- WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined
that the proposal'will not have a negative effect on the environ-
, ment, and has therefore declared a Negative Declaration for the
project; and
WHEREAS,.the project is consistent with the General Plan in
, .that the subject site is designated "Commercial" on the General
P1an Map;
: Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
does hereby resolve as follows:
A. That the granting of the proposed Conditional'Use
° Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan.
B. That the proposed location of the Conditional Use
Permit is in accord.with the objectives of the Zoning
_ Ordinance and the purpose of the zone in which the site
is located.' ,
C. That the proposed location of the Conditional Use and, �
the conditions under which it would be operated or
` maintained will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinty;
D. That the proposed Conditional Use Permit will comply
with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning
Ordinance as stated in the conditions below:
E. Finding that no substantial environmental impact will
' result from the proposed' project, a Negative Declara-
tion has been prepared.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,.
_, approves the proposed project subject to the following
conditions:
. COMMi7NITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
� . GENERAL
_ 1. The proposed development shall comply wzth a12 app3icable '
° regulations of the Lynwood Municipal Code, the Uniform
� Building code and the Fire code.
I
�
�
�
i
. . �
�
disk58:reso2296 '
j
1
i
E
, .. . �
� `
5'
� . .. .. � . . .
� .
; • .
2. Any proposed subsequent modification of the subject site or
structures thereon, sha11 be first reported to the Community
,,.. Development Department, Blanning Division, for review.
I �� 3. The applicant or his representative, shall sign a Statement
of Acceptance stating that he/she has read, understands, and
- agrees to the conditions stated herein before any buildinq
, permits are issued.
4. Not less than seven (7$) percent of the total site,
excluding areas dedicated to the public rights-of-ways,
shall be landscaped.
5. A trash enclosure must be located on the rear portion of the �
property in such a manner as to be accessible to refuse
collection vehicles. -
6. Small trash containers sha11 be conspicuously located`
h throughout the auto center for customer use.
`� 7. Access to restroom facilities must be provided. Restroom
entrances viewable from adjacent properties or rights-of-way
shall be concealed from view by planters or decorative
' screening.
, 8. Loading facilities. One (1) off-street loading space shall
be provided and shall comply with the following provisions:
^ a. The minimum required size of each loading space shall be
„_ not less than ten (10') feet in width by 25 feet in
lenqth.
s
b. All loading spaces shall have an unobstructd height of
not less than 14 feet.
i
c. All loading areas, where practical, shall be screened
from view of vehicular and pedestrian traffic and from
adjacent properties.
9. Building elevation plans must be submitted; specifying
_ arohitectural design and materials.
10. A signage plan must be submitted to the Economic Develpment
Division for approval prior to installation. '
11. All sign illum'ination should be external,.except for
individual channel letters which should•be internallv
illuminated. '
12. No sign cabinets or sign cans, with or without internal �
illumination, shall be used..
I
13. The signage should be part of the storefront composition and �
not a tacked-on afterthought.
14. Because of the predominant flat facade, the use of awninqs �
, is encouraged to help delineate a 3 pedestrian . �
quality. Further, awnings serve to shelter pedestrians from
sun and rain and protect window displays from damage.
15. Delineating the edge of an open parking lot at the property
line with plantings help maintain the continuity of the '
storefront alignment and creates a"soft" buffer for
pedestrians from parked automobiles.
disk58:reso2296
.. 1
2 �
�
�
' �
, 16. Motor vehicle products may not be displayed-along the front
of the buildings.
'. 17. No building shall exceed a height of four stories or 55
feet, whichever is less.
,; 18. No used or discarded automotive parts or equipment, or
� permanently.disabled, junked or wrecked vehicles may be
located outside the buildings.
19. Any retainig walls shall be treated in a similar manner as
the proj,ect's buildings, using compatible materials, colors
and finishes.'
20. The address of all buildings shall be displayed in a manner
acceptable to the County of Los Angeles Sheriff's Department
; , and City.of Lynwood Fire Department.
' 21. Noise from bells, loudspeakers or other noise acting as a
Ah signal of communication device shall not be permitted where
, audible from residentially-zoned property.
;.
k°:.
, PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS
° 22. This permit shall lapse and become void one hundred twenty
;, (120) days, unless extended, after the use permitte,d has
a been abandoned or_has ceased to be actively exercised.
23. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Post Office (Lynwood
- main office) to establish the location of mail boxes serving
' the proposed development. •
24. Construction shall commence within six (6) months from date
of issuance of building permits. All construction shall be
; completed in one phase.
:
25. All work shall be conducted entirely within enclosed build-
ings.
- 26. Daily operating hours shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
27. The developer shall ensure that all artificial light is
reflected away from adjoining properties.
28. No damaged or wrecked vehicles shall be stored on site. No
„ portion of the site shall be used for storage unless for
' auto retail related activity. Truck repair is prohibited.
' 29. The applicant is required to submit a landscape plan drawn
by a licensed landscape architect to the satisfaction of the
Director of Community Development prior to any building �
permit being issued.
30: The amount of landscaping required shall not be less than
seven (7$) percent of the total paved area (driveways and
open parking).
" 31. All planting shall be beds of a minimum width of five feet
(5') except where landscape area accomodates driveway
curves, and a minimum area throughout the parking area. In
addiCion, all parking aisles shall have planter areas at
each end.
, disk58:reso2296
3
._.w , ,
32. The minimum plant material shall be trees and shrubs com-
bined with ground cover as follows: One (1) five (5) gallon
, shrub for ech twenty (20) square feet of planter area; two
,. (2) fifteen (15) gallon trees for each ten (10) parking
spaces.
33. All other existing mature trees and other significant vege-
" tation should be preserved and integrated into the landscape `
plan to the satisfaction of the Community Development Direc-
tor or his/her designee.
34. All planter area fronting perimeter walls must be landscaped
with shrubs and or crawling ground cover plants that have
the ability to grow and screen the face of the wall from
view and accessibility from graffitti artists.
35. All landscaping shall be permanently maintained. Lawn and
ground covers are to be trimmed or mowed regularly, with all
planted areas kept in health and growing condition. An
' automatic sprinkler or irriqation system shall be provided
and maintained in working condition.
36. Where vehicles are to be parked immediately adjacent to a
public or private street or alley, a decorative masonry wall
__ a maximum of thirty-six inches in height measured from the
finished surface of the parking area, and/or bermed, shrub
and groundcover lot.from street view shall be provided. If
a wall is provided, there must be minimum landscaping to
screen wall from street view accessibility.
37. All tree wells along Long Beach Boulevard shall be fitted
with decorative cast iron grill covers designed to the
specifications of the City Engineering Department and the
' Community Redevelopment Agency.
' 38. Prior to the installation or construction of any fence or
. masonry wall within any zone, the property owner shall
obtain a permit and submit the following information to the
Planning Division of the Community Development Department.
a. Simple plot plan showing location of fence or masonry
: wall in relation to the property lines, heights,
proposed materials, and openings or gates to provide
access for vehicles and pedestrians.
b. For masonry walls a building permit shall be applied for
upon approval of the plot plan described above. All
masonry walls or any height shall meet the requirements
for masonry construction as defined in Chapter 24 of the
Uniform Building Code. A fee based on the valuation of
the proposed construction sha1T be paid to the Building
Division.
� 39. All fences or masonry walls shall be required to maintain
adequate pedestrian access for the purpose of safety and
convenience. A thirty-six (36) inch or three foot clear
gate or opening shall be provided to all enclosures for
- pedestrian and wheelchair access. Pedestrian and vehicular
` access shall be provided.
� 40. A decorative wall shall be erected between the subject site
� . and the adjacent residential area. The wall shall be a
minimum of six (6') feet in height.'
disk58:reso2296
, 4
., ..� .
41. A minimum of 50 parking spaces shall be provided.
42. Each off-street parking space shall not be less than eight-
� een (18) feet in length and nine (9) feet in width, exclu-
. sinve of access driveways or aisles, except as noted below:
� a. Any standard parking space that is immediately adjacent
to a wall, structural column, light standards, or
�; similar obstruction on or both of its longer sides
� . or in an enclosed space shall be at least ten (10') feet
" in width and twenty (20') feet in length.
43. All parking and loading areas shall be approved by the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer. Such surfacing
shall be permanently maintained free of structural defects.
44. Wheel stops or continuous concrete curbing at least six
inches in height shall be provided for all parking spaces
when necessary to prevent encroachment of vehicles over
-. property lines or to prevent property damage.
45. The parking area shall have lighting facilities capable of
�• providing a minimum of one foot candle illumiriation, includ-
- ing security lighting, and shall be so arranged as to re-
flect away from adjoining properties and rights-of-way.
" 46. Two parking spaces designed for the handicapped shall be
provided. These spaces may be provided as follows:
� a. Dimensions. The minimum dimensions of each automobile
parking stall for the handicapped shall be not less than
- fourteen (14} feet in width by eighteen (18) feet in .
F length. Said stalls shall be lined to provide a nine
(9) foot parking area and a five (5) foot loading and
.' unloading area or;
b. Two (2,) spaces may be provided within a twenty-three
, (23) foot wide area, lined to provide a nine (9) foot
parking area on each side of a five (5) foot loading and
unloading area. The minimum"length of each parking
space shall be eiqhteen (18) feet.
c. Location. All parking spaces for the handicapped shall
be located adjacent to the main entrance of the facility
for which the spaces are provided. The parking spaces
shall be positioned so that the handicapped persons
shall not be required to walk or wheel behind parked
vehicles.
,
°� 47. The parking lot plan for the subject site shall have a �
't circular-flow arrangement without dead-end aisles when
possible.
5 � �
48. The applicant shall submit elevation drawinqs to the '
Planning Division showing the exterior building design; i
, including the specification of colors, and materials. Prior
, to the issuance of building permits, the design of the i
building' shall be aproved by the Community Development
"_' Director'or his/her designee.
.,. �
' I
disk58:reso2296 �
n; .
5
� ��� �
I
��� � � , � � i
� Alw 7
49. Prior to the installation, display, enlarging, modifying,
relocating or changing of signs, a permit must be obtained
from the Department of Community Development, Planninq �
Division.
50. All security fences, grills, etp. shall be architecturally �
, compatible with the design of the subject and adjacent
buildings. In addition, no security fences, grills, etc.
shall be installed without the prior written approval of the
Director of Community Development and required building
permits.
51. Air conditioners, heating, cooling ventilation equipment,
swimming pool pumps and heaters and all other mechanical
devices shall be located within the rear yard or street side
yard of a corner lot. Such equipment shall be screened from
surrounding properties and street and so operated that they
do not disturb the peace, quiet and comfort of neighboring
� residents, in accordance with the City's Noise Ordinance.
" All means of access to the referenced equipment shall be '
designed and installeci so as to prevent access to
unauthorized persons and shall be approved by the Building
Division.
i '
' 52. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained iri
'• sanitary condition pending construction and shall ,be
� maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times.
Failure to comply may result in revocation of the -
, Conditional Use Permit.
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS
53. Submission and recordation of a.parcel map is required.
Building permits will not be issued prior to the recordation
of a parcel map.
54. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered
Civil Engineer.
.55. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk along Long Beach Boulevard.
56. Close existing drive approach and construct proposed drive
� approach(es), per City standards, along Long Beach Blvd.
57. Construct two (2) wheelchair ramp(s) at Northwest and
Southwest corners of Long Beach Blvd. and Pluma St.
' 58. Reconstruct damaged pavement along Long Beach Blvd.
59. Construct five (5) foot wide planter to separate the
' sidewlak from the parking lot.
i
60. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected
separately. Construct laterals as necessary.
61. Remove existing street trees. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk,
curb and pavement.
62. Install four (4) 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood
`. standards along Long Beach Blvd. Type of species to be
determined by the Engineering Division.
disk58creso2296
<. .
��
-
`, 6
I .
' � � A� �
I; A permit to install the trees is required by the Engineering
j ' Division. Exact locations of the tree(s) will be determined
at the time the permit is issued.
63. Provide and install two (2) marbelite street pole with light
fixtures, underground services and conduits on Long Beach
� Blvd.
64. Underground all utilities.
65. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all
off-site improvements.
66. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire
protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The
work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by
the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the
Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performing any
work.
Use handle type shut off valves for the customer side of the
meter.
67. Remove existing wheelchair ramp on Long Beach Blvd. in front I
of the property and construct sidewalk, curb, gutter and
: required adjacent pavement.
I
FIRE DEPARTMENT I
68. Provide approved Fire Sprinkler System; submit plans for I
approval prior to installation. I
69. Fire extinguisher requirements shall be determined by Field
Inspection. I
70. Provide metal container with self-closing lid for oily rags.
71. Provide approved parts cleaner. I
72. Provide approved storage cabients where it is desired to
keep more than ten (10) gallons of flammable liquid inside �
buildings.
Section . A copy of this resolution shall be delivered
to the applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of December, 1989, �
_ by members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
I
I
I
I
i
I
i
�
disk58:reso2296
, I
7
�
_ I
; •
I
�
; _ . ., ;i• s
� AYES :. '
.. . ,
NOES: ;
� �
ABSENT:
s°; ABSTAIN : .
,
,� , . .
Donald Dove, Chairperson
`,
�, APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
�'.
,�
; Vicente L. Mas Director pouglas D. Barnes
� ,
a :
; Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney
�
k; �
�a�.
�� , �
,?.' '
r�tr
^''
w
(
.- j
I
� i
�
fti ,
�::
f �.� • � . . . .
I
I
. �
I
' j
�
disk58:reso2296 I
1
i
i
$ �
�
, I
w ��' ,,,, ,._ , . , . �
� _, �
; ;i_;i_.i\',)r' ; C�..;'•:'i {'.,' �
. � , DATE: December 12, 1989 - --.._____,_.__.�..._......,
.� � ;��;� :��i.- ;.�, �-'��`�/ �1
,,,
T0: PLANNING COMMISSION �.: �.. . � . •. ' .
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 21800 - CASE NO TPM 11
� Applicant(s): Alan Tutland
,
PROPOSAL:
The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map No.
21800 for the purpose of consolidating two parcels, at 11840
Alameda Avenue in the M(Manufacturing) zone.
FACTS I
1. Source of Authoritv I
Section 25-18, et seq., Subdivision Regulations of the I
Lynwood Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act, I
Government Code Section 66410, et seq require that a parcel
map be recorded for the consolidation of several lots into a
single parcel, or more. I
2. Propertv Location i
�
The subject parcels are located on the southeastern corner of �
Lynwood Road at the intersection of Alameda Street (Refer to
attached Location Map.)
3. Existina Land Use
At present the subject parcels have a distribution center
which is used in the development proposal surrounded by the '
following areas:
_ I
�
North - Industrial ' East - Residential
South - Industrial West - Industrial ,
4. Land Use Desianation �
The General Plan designation for the property is Industrial I
and the zoning classification is M. I
The surrounding land use designations are as follows:
�
i
General Plan Zoninq �
North - Industrial M I
South- Residential M
East - Residential R-3
West - Industrial I,I
6. Site Plan Review �
At its regular meeting on November 20, 1989, the Site Plan �
Review Committee recommended approval to the Planning '
Commission subject to the conditions in the attached �
resolution.
i
I
disk58:tpm11 I
I
i
I
1 '
f
�
_ I
�.: ` t '
�n'<�;- ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
�" Environmental Assessment.
I. '
The Community Development Department has determined that the
project could not have a significant effect on the environment.
� Therefore, a Notice of Exemption has been prepared and is on file
�,`' in the Community Development Department and the office of the
City Clerk.
Staff analysis of this proposed lot consolidation include the
' following findings: (aj Design of the proposed site; and (b)
` Consistency of the proposed site with the General Plan.
Desian Of The Proposed Site Consolidation
a. The design of the proposed lot consolidation shows the
' consolidated lots to be in character with existing industrial
developments in the axea.
, b. The proposal is meant for the consolidation of two lots into
one in order to allow better utilization of the property.
c. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed
;., density of the development permitted by the General Plan and
, zoning ordinance in that the parcels are substantially flat
and able to support the type of development proposed.
Consistencv Of The Site With The General Plan
, a. Staff's inspection shows the site to be compatible with the
'. City of Lynwood's General Plan as the General Plan limits
land use activities to those projects that enhance the
function and quality o£ industrial developments without
altering significant7.y the character of the existing
environment.
b. The size and location of the proposed project does not
�'. significantly change the character of the existing
environment.
c. The proposed consolidation is consistent with the Zoning i
Classification of M(Manufacturing) the General Plan i
' designation of Industrial. i
; RECOMMENDATION(S): • I
I
Staff respectfully requests that, after consideration, the �
Planning�Commission adopt attached Resolution No. 2289. i
. 1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from the
, provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by section
,- 15061 b(3). i
, j
2. Approving Tentative Parcel Case No. 11, subject to the stated
�
conditions and requirements. I
�
,
Attachments: !
i
1. Location Map
` 2. Resolution No. 2303
3. Tentative Parcel Map No. 21800
. dis �
k58:tpm11 ,
,
o i
2 '
' �
;,'
e ��� .� ' �����■ ��■ � ■�.�■ , .
��
� . , . . ._ ._ . .� � . ..
1 ; . _ ... . I t
_- ------ _ � --� --_ � � ��
.o ,a �
, tl��� ,,,oa � xi
� , a �� . � �., �
F
- W 1 I �I Q,P��. ', �� W a e
W � �
V t �_
Q' „ I 1
4 1 1 e
' I�SO �� 1 1 ' CS � LOI W
O Z
� � "� i 1 \ ,I I �ot b a� aa
<
3 1 i---- t
o � I l \ I I � � b
2 0 \ � Y •
� ' O �..� �{ � 4 a ��4� � y �� 5 !0
O V.
.. V 2� 111�f� I� a 5�.sf
. . . . � rc a . WO A
� , � � LYNM900 '
,
`. . � :i °` � L.(J F:
x . �
o � coe ��. + *� a �
� c �i
o 0 �
; � , ' �e � ' � & a NT- 5 Y � � � lp,j/ �
y ' '. � , �
� � �. @ u i � � ' . i
' � R ,+ ' S O � '
� . � a0I $ � � tl5 y � � ,
ira�a � ne s 9 '�
I =� �, lTa p� 1
µ � ti
. � . ,)r . 0 \ -.,. � \ ' r `
. � . ]IJad� �. ', � \ � 4 �
�. I � 0� � a loi y ��\ \ �
' e rm��� . � � .
� I � L . '. LOI � �
' � 10'IJY'JSE �i
I t9, m !Q' \- O���� [[I i
� • � � �� V .1'�V TG' LOTS 11'q Sa'<}IN]]'Cy.e oA/N N SiP PAGC � r.l
R � W
� J�I_ - G�� ��'ur��s�s�wn oH mvs A� W ';I
� p� ,yAVS. � \ J r
- ' ' � �� � . \ \ l50 1 1
� \ /X+�d � : {
� � - b ^ LOT I � 1L �I
n \ i
) \ �,
�y� �pqC3 I i/ �
� . � IaofSpO � � . '. a� tor�
, . 4i � q � ... o �
� <� h \
� � � i� �7 � a .
' � C�Y�/�� ���� �
e
. _ ��----� J < x Q • Q ,�.� = ino so ' - >ans •
d ��
� evrcce i � ..
¢ i
y
v a.�:.
- S
V
� 9Af
. . . .._........... .
' I
-. 1
��.� �\ � +
� � �� �
' _, .../� / / _.. / .. ;
y Y` _. '.
. . . / � / � — � _... .
. " '4
J L.
� j
;,.. <
j
,
, y .
' RESOLUTION NO. 2303
i
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
'p OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 21800 TO
r CONSOLIDATE PARCELS 1 AND 2 OF MB
213-11-12 PER MAP RECORDED IN THE OFFICE
, OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF LOS ANGELES
COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood
F , pursuant to law, conducted a public hearing on the subject
applicat'ion; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has
determined that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of
the State CEQA Guidelines, as amended; and
� WHEREAS, the Planninq Commission has carefully
° considered all pertinent testimony offered in the case as
� presented at the public hearing; and
x:'
`+ WHEREAS, the preparation, filing and recordation of
` Parcel Map is required for development; and
Section 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find
and determine that said Tentative Parcel Map No. 21800 should be
approved for the following reasons:
A. The combination of lots meet all the applicable
requirements and conditions imposed by the State
Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of
the Lynwood Municipal Code.
B. The proposed combination of lots is consistent with
the applicable elements of the General Plan and the
Official Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lynwood. I
C. Proper and reasonable provisions have been made for �
adequate ingress and egress to the lots being I
combined. i
D. Proper and adequate provisions have been made for all I
, public utilities and public services, including I
sewers. i
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of I
Lynwood hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No.21800 in the M
(Manufacturing) zone, subject to the following conditions. '
• i
I
COMMiJNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDTIONS i
I
1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City I
Departments. !
�
2. The applicant, or his representative, shall sign a Statement !
of Acceptance stating that he has read, understands, and
agrees to the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, �
before any building permits are issued. �
disk58:reso2303 I
i
i I
�
, 1 i
�.
;
,.
j,; .
�� .
�, PLANNING DIVISION
�r
�� 3. Within twenty-four (24) months after approval or conditional
. approval of Tentative Parcel Map, the subdivider shall file
. with the City of Lynwood, a Final Map in substantial
,�. conformance with the Tentative Parcel Map as approved or
conditionally approved, and in conformance with the
`' Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of the
I v• City of Lynwood.
�
-� 4. No grading permit or building permit shall be issued prior
; to recordation of final map or another appropYiate
instrument aproved by the City of Lynwood, a Final map in
substantial conformance with the Tentative Parcel Map as
"'�, approved or conditionally approved, and in conformance with
the Subdivision Map Act and the Subdivision Regulations of
• the City of Lynwood.
1, 5. Extension of the Tentative Map approval shall only be
considered if the applicant or his/her representative,
submits a written request for extension to the Community
;, Development Departmnet stating the reasons for the request,
at least thirty (30) days before map approval is due to
expire, pursuant to, and in compliance with, Section 25-18,
of the subdivision regulations of the City of Lynwood.
f. '
', 6, The Final Parcel Map shall be filed with the City Engineer
of the City of Lynwood.
, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING
�.
_. 7. Comply with all conditions of the State Map Act and the
_ City's subdivision guarantee prior to recording of the final "
. map.
� All matters and improvements shall be consistent with the
orc3inances, standards, and procedures of the City's Develop-
ment Standards, Engineering Procedures and Standards, Water
Standards, and Planting Standards of the Department of Parks
and Recreation.
The Developer is responsible for checking with staff for
clarification of these requirements.
8. Submit a Subdivision Guarantee to this office.
, The final map shall be based on a field survey. All
surveying for the proposed development will be done by the
Developer, including the establishment of centerline ties.
Enclose with the final map the surveyor's closure sheets.
, 9. peveloper shall pay all applicable development fees i
. including drainage, sewer, water and parkway trees prior to '
� issuance of any building permits.
Pay Parcel Map checking fees prior to checking. I
Pay $100 monument checking fee prior to recordation. I '
�>:�: Deposit $50 with City Engineer to guarantee receipt by city I
. of recorded, reproducible mylar, parcel map prior to i
recordation. I
- i
. disk58:reso2303 I
I
' I
i
2
;`,
L
� ' .
1
� ? ..
Y . .
0� ' .
*;�,; All special assessments and utilities or sewer connection
fees are to be paid prior to recording the final map. All
requirements to utilities to be met or guarantee prior to
recording of the final map.
�
10. GRADING AND DRAINING
� A gradinq plan signed by a registered Civil Engineer shall
i be submitted for the approval of the Director of Public
Works/City Engineeer and the Director of Community
Development. The grading plan shall include the topography .
of all contigous properties and streets and shall provide
for the'methods of drainage in accordance with all
applicable City standards. Retaining wa11s and other
protective measures may be required. Offsite drainage
easements may be necessary, The structural section of all
parking areas shall be designed by a Civil Engineer based
upon soils analysis supplied by a recognized and approved
. soils engineering firm. The structural section shall be
aproved by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. In
the event that the design is not provided, the minimum
structural section that will be aproved by the Director of
' Public Works/City Engineer would be 2 inches of asphalt on 4
�,
inches of untreated rock base.
Submit to this office Geologic/Soils Report signed by a
Registered Soils Engineer.
.
„� 11. Sewers
.. The development shall be provided with public sewers.
Connect to public sewer. Provide laterals as necessary.
, Design of a21 sanitary sewers sha21 be approved by the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
F `.
12. water Svstems
� The Developer shall construct a water system including'water
� services, fire hydrants and appurtenances through the
,- development as required by the Director of Public Works/City
Enqineer. The Developer shall submit a water system plan to
the City of Lynwood Fire Department for fire hydrant.
locations. The City will install water meters only.
Payment for said meters shall be made to the City prior to
issuance of building permits. The Developer shall install
. on-site water facilities including stubs for water meters I
and fire hydrants on interior and on boundary arterial
streets.
.. �
All conditions of the Lynwood Fire Department must be met � '
prior to recordation, i
13. Public Easements and Riaht-of-Wav i
Where drainage, sewer and other such easements are required,
the minimum easement width shall be ten (10) feet to
facilitate maintenance unless otherwise approved by the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
d:isk58:reso2303 i
3
f .
:,
d '
�,
�>
� -
14. Sidewalks
. Design; configuration and locations shall be subject to the
approval of the Director o� Public Works/City Engineer, and
. the Director of Community Development. Ramps for physically
handicapped persons shall be provided both on-site and off-
' site as required by State and local regulations.
�;,'
��" 15. Dust Control ana Pedestrian Safetv
Prior to the issuance of demolition or grading permits, the
developer shall:
�,"
t a. Submit a plan indicating safety methods to be provided
! to maintain safe pedestrian ways around aIl areas of
0`. construction. This may require proper and adequate
�' signs, fences, barricades, or other approved control
devices as required by the Director of Community -
Development.
�:.
I:
16. The Developer shall install all public improvements, as
� required by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer prior
� to issuance of any occupancy permits for this development.
�• Public Zmprovemerits shall include by are not limited to:
;:
. a. Reconstruction of damaged PCC sidewalk along Califonia
Avenue and Mulford Avenue.
b. Reconstruction of damaged PCC curb and gutter along
California Avenue and Mulford Avenue.
<' .
' c. Reconstruction of damaged pavement along California
Avenue and Mulford Avenue.
d. Construction of (2) wheelchair ramps at northeast and
:`} southeast corners of California Avenue and Mulford
Avenue, '
�
e. Install two (2) marbelite street lights with underground ',
� services and conduits on California Avenue and Mulford �
Avenue.
�
f. Underground all utilities.
17. Construct a five (5) feet wide planter to separate the I
` parking lot from the sidewalk area. I
'. 18. Parcel Map must include a reciprocal easement between the
proposed parcels 1 and 2; to provide access from lot 1 to
the parking lot on Lot 2.
�- 19. Property is located within the I00 year Plood zone per �
Flood Insurance Boundary work map, of April 19, 1989. The
, property owner must sign a hold harmless aqreement with the
City of Lynwood.
,. I
. I
�
I
disk58:reso2303
�
�
�
, . � � � . I
,. _ 4
�
All changes and repairs in existing curbs, gutters, and
sidewalks and other public improvements shall be paid for
by the developer. If improvements are to be guaranteed, a
faithful performance bond shall be posted by the developer
to guarantee installation of said public improvements and
an agreement for completion of improvements with the City
; Council shall be entered into. Submit Policy of Insurance
or bond protecting City against damage or injury to persons
or property growing out of, related to, or resulting from
improvements or work. The Director of Public Works/City
Engineer will determine amount and form. Deposit with the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer before commencing
any improvements, a sum estimated by the Director of Public
Works/City Engineer to cover cost of inspection of all
improvements under his jurisdiction.
Section 3: A copy of Resolution No.2303 the
conditions shall be delivered to the applicant.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this lOth day of October 1989, by
members of the Planning Commission voting as follows:
s
` I
AYES:
NOES: �
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN: I
�
I
�
I
I
I
Donald A. Dove, Chairperson �)
I
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM: �
,
1
I
i
- i
, Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes �
Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney
i
I
I
I
I
i
1
I
disk58:reso2303 �
�
!
5 , I
�
,�
DATE: December 12, 1989
A ,'" . 1 � '1 � i . I � ,I r}
r IT� !� �VU.
T0: PLANNING COMMISSION
r Pi�� ��(�/
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director�'��J:. f'�v.
SUBJECT,: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 30
Applicant: John & Paul Pagnone
PROPOSAL•
The applicants are requesting approval of a Conditional Use
Permit to develop a single family dwelling at 3351 Elizabeth
:Avenue in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone.
�
FACTS• i
I
1. Source of Authoritv i
Section 25-42 of the Lynwood Zoning Ordinance requires I
that a Conditional Use Permit be obtained for any residen- �
tial development in the R-3 (MUlti-Family Residential) zone. �
2. Propertv Location: I
;
The site is located on the north side of Elizabeth Avenue �
between Long Beach Boulevard and California Street (Refer to
the attached Location Map).
3. Property Size• i
I
The site consists of a rectangular lot of approximately I
5,735 square feet (31'x 185'). �
4. Existina Land Use•
i
The site is presently vacant. The surrounding land uses are '
as follows:
North - Multi-Family Residential I
South - Single Family '
East - Single Family �
West - Single Family
5. Land Use Desianation• i
The General Plan designation for the subject property is I
Multi-Family, while the zoning description is R-3. The
surrounding land use designations are as follows:
i
General Plan Zoning
North - Multi-Family North - R-3 �
South - Multi-Family South - R-3 i
East - Multi-Family East - R-3
West - Multi-Family West - R-3 I
i
6. Proiect Characteristics• �
(
The applicants propose to build a single story three bedroom �
dwelling unit, which will be comprised of a living room, i
dining area, kitchen, laundry room, two bath rooms, and a
two car garage. Approximately (30�) percent of the land is I
designed for landscaping.
disk58:cup30 �
i
�
1 �
j
i
I
, ,
' 7. Site P1an.Review:
� On November 22, 1989, the Site Plan Review Committee evalu-
ated the proposed development and recommended approval to
the Planning Commission, subject to specific conditions and
requirements.
8. Zonina Enforcement Historv:
None of record.
9. Public Response: ,
' None of record.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
1. Consistencv with General Plan °
The proposed land use is consistent'with the existing zoning
clas'sification (R-3) and the General PTan designation
Multi-Family Residential. Therefore, granting Conditional
Use Permit No. 30, will not adversely affect the General
` Plan. �
2. Site Suitabilitv
,
The subject property is `adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the proposed development relative to the proposed
density; bulk of the structures; parking; wall fences;
driveways, and other development features required by� the
Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, the subject property is
adequately served with the required public utilities and
offers adequate vehicular and pedestrian accessibility.
. 3. Comoliance with Development Standards
The proposed development meets all the development standards
required by the Zoninq Ordinance regarding off-street
parking; front, and rear yard setbacks; lot coverage,
height, unit size; and density.
4. Compatibility
�� The proposed project will be located in a neighborhood that
is substantially transitioned from single-family to multi-
family residences. Properties located to the north and east
are developed with a four-plex and duplex, respectively, and '
„ other properties in the vicinity are developed with multiple
units. The proposed project is consistent with the R-3
zoning in the area and with the Multi-Family Residential
General Plan designation.
5. Conditions of Approval
The improvements 'proposed, subject to the conditions
recommended by the Site Plan Review Committee, will not have
a negative effect on the values of the surrounding
properties or interfere with or endanger the public health, .
• safety or welfare.
I'
disk58:cup30
:. 2
6. Benefits to Communitv
The proposed development will aid to aesthetically upgrade
the neighborhood and will act as a catalyst to foster other
quality developments. Moreover, the development will add
favorably to the City's housing stock in furtherance of the
policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan.
7. Environmental Assessment
The Community Development Department Staff has determined
that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to
Section 15061 b(3) of the State of California Environmental
Quality Act of 1989 as amended.
RECOMMENDATION:
, Staff respectfully requests that after consideration, the
Planninq Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2304:
� 1. Certifying that the project is categorically exempt from
the provisions of the State CEQA Guidelines as amended by
Section 15061 b(3).
2. Approving Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 30 subject
to the stated conditions,and requirements.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. Resolution No. 2304
3. Site Plan
DISK43:CUP28
3
;
.. ..
..:.:. :::..:.
/ ~�
_. , ,� �� � � 'a����, Z JL.
.= F � r ,-
_r,� F ^ � •vth� —_ ��,s � s ��J%h °� n, � h
,� F `� ti F J °` 'h u� vv o . _ .
�.,� , ' �'�� r ��F �, �. � � �o�
� � -r � £"' � � F6P ti � z-r
ry �nE ��s£ £.y h a� ��_ _o� � 7 n � a � �� .
u
' .��fiz � _��� > �_ 6 �, - - 9, o,�£ sr , � g QS££ �
o� /oh i' '' �: d lOh� � `S £'£ r ��'--
ry � 6� •�0`'-1 �s p�, a;�s£ �� 9�£F , ��s �
_�£ h ` . ££ �e� � h 95 £F_ y= `- �d�'� ^ �i �°8Pg
) �pF � I � �c-
a � ry Cg£ `�' 3 9��i iB p�,' J h�df'�' - � eE`E ; . R��g� .
Q S `�_ _ _� N t � _4Mn I � �[�
£ „ ,,:✓ 8£'g -�`c E'£ —� `'` £ _ 9Q£ o � �
� £ ° � s�F�e
e8_� C C f � h � O � £ _ _ � � n , �L �y �varf.�fE
.Bl£� �� m� .. C � h ,c ,�`.. = .
'� � �� �' �O e �££ h� q ` J/f f1` F ll'lEi 4
: , f£ '� o�£• �� ��F= � �9$F � f9F� �-- -_ .
��'<P�' ^ £F * £ _: e�.7cE � h � �� ° � =flF� .
Z •,,y£F .:�:m"'� rF--. 6 �F� � —
. <E'�.�':�::�': � e �Sp Z
O L F M � % £�� ��''� S�� hw C°..s Z�'� hF£ �
�,P — �-�s F __,,__ „^ � esr�p q � ��s£�
� �Cn,� L6.s :`� Fne£ F . +� `� E < L£eE � � M ' �
� h £ y 0 8c g �
� , � £.SF�.£ � y d,trf� =� 0 6 � o lS,s�a£ � � °�£FF .
o ,. `6££� e �. V a F e� �B .
���F � FF s h 1 h'��� r �� \
U l�.se� � F �F h • `— ��e 1�r££� i� 33e �' a F a� �%�£ �^• V
� ,� � � E
O �
ti
gt 6 2£� F . ; ` � .. J �
. .� �� � /r££u �` O£££ i � %� ' rtJM^o" ` " ��
F• zo � _ I I � o � �- O a ,.
F ? �, � � ,� 0. �� � Q �- - $ ° � � to
14, 0 1 1 3 m! I - o °^ � os
� � � �� w.! �� i»-� o � -, � i
� �° ' —_- a o 1 _ � os �
O `_' .�'1 0 o o{ ''. / 0� �� � e
' � � = \ �1 � ' ` 0/ K 6 K .b OS 1 ,- ' ��'NJ' Q' - � _
I � ' ^ t A
y 1 � �Q/� � � ` y �y �
Irl [i / % \ � � � � b � f��
u / � � s b� �.r`
� �, ,S � ` i V 4oe � .
o J a-
' . ' . I o �,� - �
- o `�-
.�.,..� rn�;..+�.�...r� . . . . ' . . .
_., rt�;c;G�_�GRffRRBBR[It4mei�mm�ncnromnr�n.rnnmA...� ..................._... - . •. '- .
I
� � �
I
1
t
�
1
�, RESOLUTION NO. 2304
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF LYNWOOD APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 30 FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
AT 3351 ELIZABETH AVENUE, IN THE R-3
' (MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, LYNWOOD
CALIFORNIA, 90262.
WHEREAS, the Lynwood Planning Commission, pursuant to law,
conducted a public hearing on the subject application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, considered all pertinent
testimony offered at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined
that the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15061 b(3), as amended; and
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for
development in the R-3 (Multi-Family Residential) zone.
- SECTION 1. The Planning Commission hereby finds and deter-
mines as follows:
A. The site of the proposed use is adequate in size and
shape to accommodate the structures, parking, walls,
landscaping, driveways and other development features
required by the Official zoning Ordinance.
B. The structures, as proposed, subject to conditions, will
not have a negative effect on the values of surrounding
^ properties or interfere with or endanger the public,
health, safety or welfare.
C. The site will be developed pursuant to the current zoning
regulations and site plan submitted and approved by the
Site plan review Committee.
D. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not
adversely affect the General Plan.
E. The proposed development will add favorably to the
housing stock and will provide additional affordable
priced housing in concert with the policies of the
Housing Element of the General Plan.
F. The proposed development will aid in esthetically
upgrading the area and will act as a catalyst in
fostering other quality developments.
Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Lynwood,
based upon the aforementioned findings and determinations, hereby
approves Conditional Use Permit, Case No. 30, provided the
following conditions are observed and complied with at all
times.
disk58:reso2304
1
I
i � . .
t
I
I
, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1. The applicant shall meet the requirements of all other City
Departments.
2. The applicant or his representative, shall sign a Statement
of Acceptance within fifteen (15) days from the date of
approval of this Resolution by the Planning Commission.
Signing this statement implies that applicant or his repre-
sentative has read, understands and agrees to the conditions
of this Resolution.
3. All City of Lynwood Municipal Code'and Zoning Ordinance
requirements shall be met.
PLANNING DZVISION
4. The total development will consist of one (1) one-story
. residential unit, along with parking and other amenities.
5. A minimum of one (1) two-car garage shall be provided.
6. A minimum of twenty-five percent (25%) of the lot shall be
landscaped and provided with an automatic irrigation system.
7. Street numbers for the new building unit numbers shall be
plainly visible and shall be a minimum of four inches (4")
in height and shall be contrasting in color to the
, background.
8. All construction shall be performed by a licensed
contractor.
9. A landscape plan shall be submitted and approved prior to
the issuance of building permits.
10. No principal building on the site shall exceed a height of
' thirty-five (35')� feet.
11. Construction shall be commence within six (6) months from
date of issuance of building permits.
12. The Conditional Use Permit shall become null and void if
compliance under the foregoing conditions does not commence
within one-hundred (120) days from the date on which the
Conditional Use Permit was granted.
13. A masonry wall six feet (6') in height shall be constructed
along the perimeter of the property, except within the
twenty foot (20') front yard setback, which shall not exceed
four feet (4') in height. Construction of a fence in the
front yard set-back is optional (not required).
14.. The existing property shall be cleaned and maintained in a
sanitary condition pending construction, and shall be
maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times.
Failure to comply may result in revocation of the
Conditional Use Permit.
15. Final building elevations, including materials of
construction, shall be submitted to and approved by the
Building Official prior to issuance of any building permits.
disk58:reso2304
2
� . •
�
i , , ,
�
i
�
�
�
�
i 16. Before any building permits may be issued, the
� applicant/developer shall pay $1.53 per square foot for
1- residential buildings to the Lynwood Unified School
� District, pursuant to Government Code Section 53080.
PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING CONDITIONS
17. Provide documentation that lots composing the property were
legally separated to the satisfaction of the Department of
Public Works. After reviewing the documents, the Department
. of Public Works may require the submission and recordation
of a parcel map or lot merger.
18. Dedicate a five (5') wide strip of property along Elizabeth
Avenue.
19. Submit a grading plan prepared and signed by a registered
. Civil Engineer. Grading plan will be checked by Public
Works Department. No building permits will be issued prior
to the approval of grading plan by City Engineer.
20. Reconstruct damaged sidewalk along property frontage on
Elizabeth Avenue.
' 21. Reconstruct damaged and substandard drive approach(es), per
City standards.
22. Reconstruct damaged curb and gutter along property frontage
on Elizabeth Avenue.
y . 23. Reconstruct A.C. pavement section on Elizabeth Ave.
24. Connect to public sewer. Each building shall be connected
separately. construct laterals as necessary.
� 25. Install one 24" box street trees per City of Lynwood
standards along Elizabeth Avenue.
; Species to be determined by the Public Works Dept. A permit
� to install the trees is required by the Engineering
Division. Exact locations of the the tree(s) will be
' determined at the time the permit is issued.
26. Regrade parkway and landscape with grass.
'" 27. Provide and install 1 marbelite street pole with light
fixture, underground services and conduits approximately 12'
from a easterly property line.
2E3. Underground all utilities.
29. A permit from the Engineering Division is required for all
off-site improvements.
30. All required water meters, meter service changes and/or fire
protection lines shall be installed by the developer. The
work shall be performed by a licensed contractor hired by
the developer. The contractor must obtain a permit from the
Public Works/Engineering Division prior to performinq any
work.
disk58:reso2304
3
� . .. _ _ . ....
FIRE DEPARTMENT
31. If security bars are placed on bedroom windows, at least one
window for each bedroom shall have quick release mechanisms
that does not require a key or any special knowledge.
U.B.C. Sec. 1204
32. Provide smoke detectors, (U.L. and State Fire Marshal
approve type.)
Section 3. A copy of Resolution No. 2304 shall be
delivered to the applicant.
�..
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of December, 1989, by
members of Planning Commission votinq as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
" ABSENT:
� ABSTAIN:
it
�,
�s?
T
��� .
<
; Donald Dove, Chairman
�
- APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
'q
d
Vicente L. Mas, Director pouglas D. Barnes
Community Development Dept. Deputy City Attorney
I�
I"
disk58:reso2304
4
� . .. ... ...
� � .
� �
�� � '��� `�,�sDA ITEM N0.
�� CASE N0. ���� �i
DATE: December 12, 1989
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Vicente L. Mas, Director
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Case No. 31
Applicant: Donald Chae
PROPOSAL•
� The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to
� rehabilitate a 135,440 square foot, two story Multi-Tenant Market
place (formerly Montgomery Ward) at 3100 Imperial Highway.
� At its regularly scheduled meeting of November 22, 1989, the site
Plan Review Committee recommended that the application be
� approved provided all the conditions are accepted and met by the
I applicant. However, the applicant is still reviewing the
conditions for acceptance.
� RECOMMENDATION:
' Staff respectfully request that after consideration, the Planning
Commission continue Conditional Use Permit No. 31 to its
reqularly scheduled meeting of January 9, 1989.
s� i �
d1sk58:CUP25
.,,y
F
u
?' 1
�.
X;,
a`. .