Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
12 28 17 Agenda w/back-up
CHAIRMAN: VICE CHAIRMAN: BOARD MEMBER: ALTERNATE MEMBER Hewlett Kent Thomas Smith Robert Dockerty Malcolm Murphy S. Curtiss Roach Amanda Jones Jorgette Smith REGULAR MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING BEING HELD REVIEW AND PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF GULF THURSDAY, DECEMBER 28, 2017 AT 8:30 A.M., IN COMMISSION CHAMBERS OF THE TOWN HALL, 100 SEA FLORIDA. December 20, 2017 BY THE ARCHITECTURAL STREAM, FLORIDA ON THE WILLIAM F. KOCH, JR. ROAD, GULF STREAM, I. Call to Order. II. Roll Call. III. Minutes of the Regular Meeting and Public Hearing on 9-28-17. IV. Additions, withdrawals, deferrals, arrangement of agenda items. V. Announcements. A. Meeting Dates 1. Regular Meeting & Public Hearing a. January 25, 2018 at 8:30 A.M. b. February 22, 2018 at 8:30 A.M. c. March 22, 2018 at 8:30 A.M. d. April 26, 2018 at 8:30 A.M. e. May 24, 2018 at 8:30 A.M. £. June 28,2018 at 8:30 A.M. VI. PUBLIC HEARING. A. Declaration of Ex -Parte Communication B. Administer Oaths C. Applications for Development Approval 1. An application submitted by Carlos Linares, Randall Stofft Architects, as agent for N. Ocean Capital 2929 B LLC, owner of property located at 2929 N. Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream, Florida 33483, legally described as the South 120 feet of Lot 1, Gulf Stream, Ocean Tract recorded in Plat Book 16, Page 81 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida. a. SPECIAL EXCEPTION #1 to permit an additional 220 square feet of covered, unenclosed floor area that exceeds the maximum FAR of 8,705 square feet. b. SPECIAL EXCEPTION #2 to permit the construction of a 488 square foot gate house in the Beachfront Design District. c. NORTH OCEAN BLVD. OVERLAY PERMIT to permit the construction of a 488 square foot gate house and an 8 foot high stucco wall within the North Ocean Blvd. Corridor. d. LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN REVIEW to permit construction of a two-story Gulf Stream Bermuda style single family dwelling with attached 3 car garage and a detached gate house, a total of 8,925 square feet, and swimming pool and spa. VII. Items related to previous approvals. A. Revision to previously approved plans submitted by Matt Wolf, Edgewater Building Group, as agent for Kristina and Ardie Ermers, owners of property located at 800 Canary Walk, Gulf Stream, Florida 33483, legally described as Lot 24 and the westerly 100 feet of Lot 30, Place Au Soleil Subdivision. AGENDA CONTINUED 1. Landscaping 2. Style of Outside lights 3. Fence Installation VIII. Assignment from the Town Commission. A. Review and evaluate the items listed under "discouraged" in Chapter 70 of the Code of Ordinances. IX. Items by Board Members continued from May 2017 meeting. X. Items by Staff. XI. Public. XII. Adjournment. SHOULD ANY INTERESTED PARTY SEEK TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING BOARD WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, SAID PARTY WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE, MAY NEED TO INSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 286.0105, F.S.S. REGULAR MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF GULF STREAM, FLORIDA ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2017 AT 8:30 A.M., IN THE WILLIAM F. KOCH, JR. COMMISSION CHAMBERS OF THE TOWN HALL, 100 SEA ROAD, GULF STREAM, FLORIDA. I. Call to Order. Chairman Kent called the meeting to order at 8:30 A.M. II. Roll Call. Present and Hewlett Kent Chairman Participating: Malcolm Murphy Board Member S. Curtiss Roach Board Member Gregory Dunham Town Manager Edward Nazzaro Staff Attorney Edward Allen Police Chief Rita Taylor Town Clerk Absent W/Notice: Thomas Smith Vice Chairman Robert Dockerty Board Member Amanda Jones Alternate Member John Randolph Town Attorney III. Minutes of the Regular Meeting and Public Hearing July 27, 2017. Mr. Murphy moved to approve the Minutes of July 27, 2017, Mr. Roach seconded the motion and all voted AYE at roll call. IV. Additions, withdrawals, deferrals, arrangement of agenda items. There were no changes to the agenda. V. Announcements. A. Meeting Dates 1. Regular Meeting & Public Hearing a. October 26, 2017 @ 8:30 A.M. Mr. Murphy and Mr. Roach said they will not be attending The October meeting. b. November to be determined. Inasmuch as the November meeting date is Thanksgiving Day the Board agreed that the November meeting would be held on Nov. 16th. c. December 28, 2017 at 8:30 A.M. d. January 25, 2018 @ 8:30 A.M. VI. PUBLIC HEARING. A. Declaration of Ex -Parte Communication There was no Ex -Parte Communication declared. B. Administer Oaths The Town Clerk administered the Oath to Supradheep Kanthan, Thomas Smith and Mark Melbrick. C. Applications for Development Approval 1. An application submitted by Supradheep Kanthan, Kanthan Design Corp. as agent for Gulf Stream Golf Club, owner of property located at 2401 N. Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream, Florida Architectural Review & Planning Board Regular Meeting & Public Hearing September 28, 2019 @ 8:30 A.M. 33483, legally described as 14 Tracts of land lying in Sections 3, 4, 9 & 10, Township 46 south, Range 43 east. Mr. Kanthan said the Golf Club has asked them to design a golf training facility for the use of members of the club. He said this is a small building that will be hidden with the existing vegetation and will not be seen from the street. He also said that it is of a design to match that of the club house. Mr. Smith, the contractor said that the actual construction will take about 7 weeks. In answer to a question from Town Manager Dunham, Mr. Kanthan said the building would be accessed via the cart path after parking vehicles at the parking area at the club house. Mr. Dunham said the staff would like to make a recommendation that a condition be added to any approvals that vehicles belonging to anyone using the training facility shall be parked at the club house and never along AlA. a. LEVEL 2 ARCHITECTURAL/SITE PLAN REVIEW to construct a 668 sq. ft. Mediterranean Revival & Spanish Colonial Revival Golf Training Facility on the existing golf course. Mr. Murphy moved to approve the Level 2 Architectural/Site Plan based on a finding that the proposed construction of a one story Mediterranean Revival & Spanish Colonial Revival Golf Training Facility meets the minimum intent of the Design Manual and applicable review standards with the following conditions: 1) Any minor modifications in the existing landscaping shall be submitted to the Town Manager for review and approval and any major modifications shall be brought Back to the ARPB for review and approval, prior to commencement of landscaping. 2) Access to the facility will only be available to the members after they have parked in the designated parking area at the club house. Parking along AlA to access the facility will not be permitted. Mr. Roach seconded the motion and all voted AYE at roll call. VII. Items by Staff. There were no items by the staff. VIII. Items by Board Members. There were no items from members of the board. IX. Public. There were no comments from the public. X. Adjournment. Chairman Kent adjourned the meeting at 8:50 A.M. N Architectural Review s Planning Board Regular Meeting 4 Public Hearing September 28, 2019 @ 8:30 A.M. Rita Taylor Town Clerk 3 TOWN OF GULF STREAM ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING REPORT Application #: 017-09 Owner: N. Ocean Capital 2929 B LLC Address: 2929N. Ocean Blvd. Agent: Carlos Linares, Randall Stofft Architects Proposed Improvement: Construction of two-story, single family dwelling w/attached 3 car garage. detached gatehouse, pool and spa. Approvals Requested: Special Exception: To permit an additional 220 SF of covered, unenclosed area that exceeds the maximum permitted Floor Area Ratio of 8,705 square feet. Special Exception: To permit the construction of a 488 Square foot gate house in the Beachfront Design District. North Ocean Blvd. Overlay District To permit the construction of a 488 square foot gate house and an 8 foot high stucco wall within the North Ocean Blvd. Corridor. Level III Architectural/Site Plan: To permit the construction of a two story Gulf Stream Bermuda style single family dwelling with an attached 3 -car garage, a detached gate house, a total of 8,925 SF, and a swimming pool and spa. Gross Lot size: 47,847 SF Proposed Total Floor Area: 8,925 SF Zoning District: RS -B Finished Floor: 17 NAVD Issues Considered During Review: Effective Lot Area: 30,524 SF Allowable: 8,705 Height: 35' Roof Eave Height: 24' 6" (discouraged), 2nd story roof Eave Height: 15' 8" (discouraged), entry feature height Section 66-144 Standards: Regarding Level II & III architectural/ site plan review Section 70-4 How to use this manual: Regarding Design Standards Section 70-67 Effective lot area Section 70-70 Floor area calculations Section 70-72 Special exception floor ratio (FAR) (b) Roof projections Section 70-74 Setbacks Section 70-75 Special exception setback (f)Accessory gate houses in Beachfront District Section 70-100 Roof and eave heights NOTE: DISCOURAGED. The entry feature height is 15', 8" which is in the discouraged range (14' to 16'). Architectural Review and Planning Board ARPB File #017-09 ARPB December 28, 2017; TC January 12, 2018 Page 2 NOTE: DISCOURAGED. The second story eave height is 24, 6" which is the maximum of the discouraged range (22' 6" to 24'6") Section 70-101 Windows Section 70-187 Table of district standards Motions: Motion to recommend approval of a special exception to allow 220 SF of covered, unenclosed area that exceeds the maximum permitted Floor Area Ratio. Motion to recommend approval of a special exception to allow the construction of a 488 Square foot gate house in the Beachfront Design District. Motion to recommend approval to allow the construction of a 488 square foot gate house and an 8 foot high stucco wall within the North Ocean Blvd. Corridor. Motion to recommend approval of a Level III Architectural/ Site Plan based on a finding that the proposed construction of a Gulf Stream Bermuda style, two-story, single family dwelling with attached 3 -car garage consisting of 8,925 SF, and a swimming pool and spa meet the minimum intent of the Design Manual and applicable review standards with the fallowing conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the owner of the property shall prepare and record a deed restriction which shall provide that all roof projection areas shall remain unenclosed as per approval of the special exception for as long as the structure is in existence or exceeds the maximum FAR. 2. Any minor modifications in the existing landscaping shall be submitted to the Town Manager for review and approval and any major modifications shall be brought back to the ARPB for review and approval, prior to commencement of landscaping. ARPB Date: December 28, 2017 Action: Special Exception: Special Exception: Construction Within North Ocean Blvd. Corridor: Level III Architectural/ Site Plan: TC Date: January 12, 2018 Action: Special Exception: Special Exception: Construction Within North Ocean Blvd. Corridor: Level III Architectural/Site Plan: Town of Gulf Stream TOWN OF GULF STREAM ► RECEIVED i DEC 0 ''L,1 Town of Gulfstream, FL APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL This form Is to be used for all development review applications to be heard by the Town of Gulf Stream .Architectural Review and Planning Board, Board of Adjustment, and/or Town Commission. To complete the farm properly, please review the accompanying Town of Gulf Stream Instruction Manual for Application for Development Review Form. Failure to complete this form properly will delay Its consideration. .01 ARPB File # PART II, GENERAL INFORMATION To be completed by all applicants. A. Project Information I.A.I. Project/Owner Name: Custom Residence/ N. Ocean Capital 2929 B LLC I.A.2. Project Address: 2929 N. Ocean Blvd. , GULF STREAM, FL GULF STREAM OCEAN TRS TRS, S 120 FT OF IT 1 I.A.3. Project Property Legal Description: I.A.4. Project Description (describe in detail, Including # of stories, etc.) BUILD NEW TWO STORY, 7,281SF A/C SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IA.5. Square Footage of New Structure or Addition: 8,924 Se Architectural Style: BERMUDA STYLE ARCHITECTURE 1.A.6. Check all that apply: 0 ArchlteclurallSite Plan Review M Land Clearing ® North Ocean Boulevard Overlay (complete section S) D Demolition of Structures ❑ Non-residential uses ❑ Variance (complete section G) ® Special Exception (complete section F.) 1.A.7. (a) P1oposad F.F.E.: +17.01NAVD/+1e.5'NGVD Type of Foundation: GRADE BEAMS AND PILES 13. Owner Information /'"� I.B.I . Owner I.B.2. Owner Phone 1.0.3. Ow.ler Signature; C. Agent Information / I.C.I. Agent Name and 125 zrjt 2dt3 4241 CARLOS LINARES / RANDALL STOFFT ARCHITECTS I.C.2. -Agent Address: 42 N. SWINTON AVE. DELRAY BEACH. FL 33444 I.C.3. Agent Phone Number: (o) (561)243-0799 cell Fax 1 C 4 Agent Signature ' Official Use Only Pre -App Date: ARPB Dale: App Date: Recommendation: Com Date: TC Date: Decision: Application for Development Approval Form ADA.2000 revised 6/13100 Page 2 1= Town of Gulf Steam TOWN OF GULF STREAM APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL bl� RECEIVED lit DEC a 1217 lown of Gulfstream, FL This form is to be used for all development review applications to be heard by the Town of Gulf Stream .Architectural Review and Planning Board, Board of Adjustment, andfor Town Commission. To complete the form property, please review the accompanying Town of Gulf Stream Instruction Manual for Applfoadon for Development Review Form. Failure to complete this form properly will delay Its consideration. PART It. GENERAL INFORMATION To be completed by all applicants. A. Projectlnfornatton ARPB File # f f'd ? I.A.1. ProjecllOwner Name: Ll atom Residence/ N. Ocean Capital 2929 B LLC IA.2. Project Address: 2929 N. Ocean Blvd. , GULF STREAM, FL IA.3. Project Property Legal Description: UDLF STREAM OCEAN TRS TRS, S 130 FI OF LT 1 IA4. Project Description (descdbe In dell Including # ofslories, etc)_ BUILD NEW IND STORY, 7,3815F A/C SINGLC FAMILY RESIDENCE [A.S. Square Footage of New Structure or Addtilon: a, 924 SF Architectural Style: BERYMMA, STYLE ARCHITECTURE 1 AG. Check all that appy: ® ArchitecturatlSite Flan Review In Land Clearing in North Ocean Boulevard Overlay (complete section B) ❑ Demolilion of Structures ❑ Non�resldenllal uses ❑ Variance (complete section G) ® Special Exception (complete section F_) ♦17.0'NAVD/i1B.S'NGVp GRADE BEAMS AND PILES 1.A.7. (a) Proposed F.F.E.: Type of Foundation: B. Owner Information I.B.I. Owner Addr/e�j I.B.2. Owner Phdne I I.B.3. Ovner Signetu gni 243 4141 C. Agent Information I.C.I. Agent Neme and F' ams: CARLOS LINARES / RANDALL STOPFT ARCHITECTS I.C.2. Agent Address: 42 N. SWINTON AVE. DELRAY BEACH. FL 33444 I.C.3. Agent Phone Number: (0) (561)243-0799 I.C.4. Agent Signature: -- _ Official use Only Pre -App Dale: ARPB Dale: App Dale: Recommendation: Com Date: TC Date: Decision: Application for Development Approval Form ADA.2000 revised 0113100 Page 2 • ►/ Town of Gulf Stream PART III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION To be completed by all applicants after pre -application conference with Town Staff. Please be concise but brief. Attach additional sheets only when necessary and be sure to include the appropriate and complete question number for each response. A. Project Description and Justification III.A.1. In what zoning district is the project site located? GULF STREAM - BEACH FRONT DISTRICT (RS -B) III.A.2. Is the project compatible with the intent of the zoning district? ® Yes ❑ NO Explain. THE PROPOSED TWO STORY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE FITS WITHIN ALL THE SITE SETBACKS,- ARCHITECTURAL ETBACKS,ARCHITECTURAL STYLE, MASSING, MATERIALS USED AND LUSH LANDSCAPE SET FORTH BY THE GULF STREAM BEACHFRONT DISTRICT GUIDELINES. III.A.3. Is the project consistent with the Future Land Use Map and goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan? ® Yes ❑ No THE PROPOSED HOME IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND USE AS IT COMPLIMENTS THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. III.A.4. How are ingress and egress to the property to be provided? A 16' WIDE DRIVEWAY WILL EXTEND FROM NORTH OCEAN BLVD. TO DRIVEWAY INTO PROPOSED GARAGES. III.A.5. How are the following utilities to be provided to the property? a. Stormwater Drainage ON SITE RETENTION/ DETENTION (SEE DRAINAGE PLANS) b. Sanitary Sewer CONNECTION TO NEW PROPOSED TOWN SEWER SYSTEM c. Potable Water CONNECTION TO TOWN WATER SYSTEM d. Irrigation Water CONNECTI,ON TO TOWN WATER SYSTEM e. Electricity CONNECTION TO FP&L f. Telephone CONNECTION TO PRIVATE COMPANY(AT&T OR EQUAL) g. Gas CONNECTION TO PROPANE TANK (WILL SUBMIT FOR PERMIT) h. Cable Television CONNECTION TO PRIVATE COMPANY(DIRECT TV OR EQUAL) III.A.6. If the project involves the erection of one or more structures, please describe how the structures are consistent with the criteria In Section 66-144 of the Town of Gulf Stream Code. (Attach additional sheet If necessary.) THE PROPOSED STRUCTURES ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE CRITERIA OF LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL/ SITE PLAN REVIEW AS IT MEETS THE CRITERIA OF ITEMS 1-12 UNDER SECTION 66-144. PART IV. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Section A is to be completed by all applicants after pre -application conference with Town staff. Answering "Yes" to any question in Section A requires the completion of additional Sections as indicated. A. Additional Approvals/Requirements IV.A.1. Does the project involve land area within fifty feet (50') of the AIA (North Ocean Boulevard) right -of- way? ® Yes ❑ No (If "Yes", section B of this part must be completed.) IV.A.2. Does the project Involve the demolition of one or more structures? ❑ Yes ID No (If "Yes", section C of this part must be completed.) IV.A,3. Does the project involve the clearing or filling of any portion of an existing vacant lot or more than fifty percent (50%) of the landscaped area of a developed lot? ® Yes ❑ No (If "Yes", section D of this part must be completed.) IV.A.5. Does the project require approval of a Special Exception? ® Yes ❑ No (If "Yes", section E of this part must be completed.) IV.A.6. Is the project at variance with any regulations contained in the Zoning Code? ❑ Yes ® No (If "Yes", section G of this part must be completed.) Application for Development Approval Form ADA.32000 13 Page 3 Town of Gulf Stream B. Projects Requiring North Ocean Boulevard Overlay Permit IV.B.1. What significant landscape features or architectural features are to be disturbed or added and to what exlent7 THE PROJECT DOES NOT PROPOSE DISTURBANCE IN ARCHITECTURE OR LANDSCAPE. THE PROJECT PROPOSES AN IMPROVEMENT TO THE EMPTY LOT WITH BEAUTIFUL ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE. IV.8.2. Describe the need and justification for the disturbance/addition: BY ADDING NEW STRUCTURE AND LUSH LANDSCAPE IT TIES THIS PROPERTY TO ITS SURROUNDINGS AND ENHANCES THE VALUE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. IV.8.3. Will the disturbance/addition destroy ar-seriously impair visual relationships among buildings, landscape features and open space, or introduce incompatible landscape features or plant material that destroys or Impairs significant views or vistas within the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District? Yes F907 Explain: IV.B.4. How is the design consistent with the AIA Landscape Enhancement Project? NEW LUSH LANDSCAPE FOR THE NEW HOME, ENHANCES THE STREETSACPE OF AIA. IV.B.5. What.mitigation is proposed so that the disturbance/addition has the least impact possible to the visual and aesthetic quality of the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District:, FILLING IN THE VACANT PROPERTY WITH A BEAUTIFUL DESIGN ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPE, MAKES THIS PROPERTY MORE IN KEEP WITH THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES AND ENHANCING N. OCEAN BLVD. C. Projects Requiring a Demolition Permit' IV.C.1. When are the existing structures to be demolished? N/A IV.C.2. When are the proposed structures to be constructed? AFTER BUILDING PERMIT HAS BEEN AWARDED IV.C.3. What Is the landmark status of the structures to be demolished? NONE D. Projects Requiring a Land Clearing Permit .IV.D.1. Describe those vegetative materials of 8 inches in diameter and greater to be North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District: 3 SABAL PALMS IV.D.2. Describe the need and justification for the removal/relocation: SABAL PALMS TO BE RELOCATEDSEE LANDSCAPE PLANS IV.D.3. How is the removal from the project site of vegetation to be miligated: N/A IV.D.4. How are the remaining and relocated vegetative materials to be protected and preserved during the land clearing and constriction activities and thereafter? WILL PROVIDE ORANGE MESH AND STAKE BARRIERS FOR MATERIALS TO BE RELOCATED. IV.D.5. What replacement materials are proposed? N/A Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 4 February 2002 . .nrodl 11 E. Projects Requiring a Special Exception. IV.E.1. Is the proposed use a permitted special exception use? ®Yes ❑ No Code Section: 70-72 (b) / 70-75 (f ) IV.E.2. How Is the use designed, located and proposed to be operated so that the public health, safety, welfare, and morals will be protected? THE PROPOSED F.A.R. SQUARE FOOTAGE EXCESS AND GATE HOUSE ARE PROPERLY ENGINEERED AND DESGNED STRUCTURES. IV.E.3. Will the use cause substantial Injury to the value of other property in the neighborhood where it is to be located? ❑ Yes ® No EXplain.THE GATE HOUSE AND EXCESS SQUARE FOOTAGE PART OF THE OUTDOOR SPACE THAT HELPS THE FUNCTION OF THE ARCHITECTURE BUT HAS NO NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE PROPER . IV,E.4. How will the use be compatible with adjoining development and the character of the District where it Is to be located? OUTDOOR SPACES ENHANCES THE ARCHITECTURE AND ADDING THE GATE HOUSE STRUCTURE THE ENTRY TO THE PROPERTY. IV.E.5. What landscaping and screening are provided? PLEASE SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS. IV.E.6, Does the use conform with all applicable regulations governing the District wherein it is to be located? 0 Yes ❑ No F. Non -Residential Projects and Residential Projects of Greater than 2 Units 1. If common area facilities are to be provided, describe them and how they are to be maintained. IV.F.2. If recreation facilities are be provided, describe them and their potential Impacts on surrounding properties. IV,F.3. For each of the following, list the number provided and their Loading Spaces: Standard Parking Spaces: Small Car Parking Spaces: Handicapped Parking Spaces: Driveways/Aisles: Application for Development Approval Form ADA.32000 4• Page 5 +13.33 +13.23 (_ S20 0 z{ Z I I 0 AkDep I -0 m 10 I O p; D c� + , �I C ' CD aI r I I I , m 0 m� m MID zm m LINE OF AUSTRALIAN PINE TREES, SIZE +132- VARIES, INDIVIDUAL TREES NITS LOCATED � ARC=120.07' 9 (3CANOR4i Ta4 5 q rIG 1=i124� 69 +13.2 -_-_-___ ------- I I 1 I I y I I I 1 I I� I I I I I N I I ' I ' ' I COASTAL CoN< +12.4 I 0 ^ I y � I I ----------------------- --� L--- i `. --''----II -- I COASTAL CONSTRUCTION (PLAT BOOK 7eGE RIOL LINE � V M CONC. BULKHEAD CAP C SD�CD- --� 'o I Im A I I"0 n A I I I I �F s6�r I I I AkDep I P1 i , �I C ' r I I I , } I I I I I I ' J 1^ , i _-_______-_ I , I 33.52-W 2929 NORTH OCEAN BLVD. !oma — I _ GULFSTREAK FLORIDA } e I _ joo.o� _ (' I I I IN a LINE D 2) 42 N T 1897 Y.'O,Mgq�WpE91�ENML11Mr6A3W OLEMI-us COxsRv,rffMKMSK3v19 6N r � I --I ❑� I I I ne� lOm PD 0W19 19 iO L- I I I I I� I �ajJ I ttI I I I� I I 0 ^ I y � I I ----------------------- --� L--- i `. --''----II -- I COASTAL CONSTRUCTION (PLAT BOOK 7eGE RIOL LINE � V M CONC. BULKHEAD CAP C SD�CD- --� 'o I Im A I I"0 n A I I I I �F s6�r 11 1 T I1 3E^ e•r I i f: SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 12-01-17 U7 "Aslif AkDep III�IIIRANDALL STOFFT CUSTOM RESIDENCE ° } R ARCHITECTS 9 q 9 , 2929 NORTH OCEAN BLVD. pk GULFSTREAK FLORIDA } e j `t •e a o 11 1 T I1 3E^ e•r I i f: SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 12-01-17 U7 AkDep III�IIIRANDALL STOFFT CUSTOM RESIDENCE ° R ARCHITECTS 9 q 9 , 2929 NORTH OCEAN BLVD. distinctive. inspirational. architecture. GULFSTREAK FLORIDA } e j `t •e a o 42 N SWINION AVE DFLUY fiFACN 4134W e611 E1H1199 • NAfliS. FL nM'1611. WINVSIOFF'r.CUM Y.'O,Mgq�WpE91�ENML11Mr6A3W OLEMI-us COxsRv,rffMKMSK3v19 6N r � 11 1 T I1 3E^ e•r I i f: SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 12-01-17 AkDep III�IIIRANDALL STOFFT CUSTOM RESIDENCE ° ARCHITECTS , 2929 NORTH OCEAN BLVD. distinctive. inspirational. architecture. GULFSTREAK FLORIDA } e j `t •e a o 42 N SWINION AVE DFLUY fiFACN 4134W e611 E1H1199 • NAfliS. FL nM'1611. WINVSIOFF'r.CUM Y.'O,Mgq�WpE91�ENML11Mr6A3W OLEMI-us COxsRv,rffMKMSK3v19 A10Iay. 1L1R011 tu»m.0 701 --1--TIM I I LP4I� � - I d — �) m hj —HLA� �LJ� � �11 ® [•u', NMI. tfLz: RI �m MEN w 1101 1 LIJ ♦------ - - - - -- --------- § Z£Z e1=g U)2 = o m 2 srn ---- o :aRs .�g,g m O C= m =3 v z A N = 1111ILRA.NDALL STOFFT ARCHITECTS distinctive. inspirational. architecture. 42 N SVM AW_ a Y HFA M D M Ii , . NAFIFS , and M,%V . SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 12-01-17 CUSTOM RESIDENCE 2929 NORTH OCEAN BLVD. GULFSTREAK FLORIDA v i r ., � El CLIA . .� i , SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 12-01-17 41� 41 � � 4o n z SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 12-01-17 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 12-01-17 e �1 o Igoe IjijoS eSR i P P P 9 ? P P P C P _ ll - ��I�IIrRANDALL STOFFT CUSTOM RESIDENCEIj e��p�� ➢;f o S e Z L L L 2929 NORTH OCEAN BLVD. IIIII o distinctive. inspirational. architecture. GULFSTREAM, FLORIDA @ e 4 G i 1 y J R B'Ilqnf)� I C §bg b 7b bjF b III I III I ei I I II I II II I I I II I I 'a Z i w C L 16 I I e e t g< e 9 P F 8i ig F6 e. I y` g g g`I s i I III I I It I ISI\ I I Iii I LC L =o C ( I N I II vo I m A D O " O -n 0 I I m C ll z I. o X m D _ If I rn Z I o m I � o III � v A SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 12-01-17 e �1 o Igoe IjijoS eSR i � _ ll - ��I�IIrRANDALL STOFFT CUSTOM RESIDENCEIj e��p�� ➢;f o ARCHITECTS �e � , 2929 NORTH OCEAN BLVD. IIIII o distinctive. inspirational. architecture. GULFSTREAM, FLORIDA @ e 4 G i 1 y J R B'Ilqnf)� � 6 •env my ___. _ us [orv5114ea1f n�F.WN1NpICq, °)/Iq%)%M]NI Of Y V! 4 0 m m m D O z w O I P a a o 1I1AMANDALL STOFFT ARCHITECTS distinctive. inspirational. architecture. 42 N BWN AVE NnFAY BEACH. M SIN! M }AYBpq . NAPES n. am urnn . wwwsN 4, zb SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 12-01-17 DD CUSTOM RESIDENCE 2929 NORTH OCEAN BLVD. GULFSTREAK FLORIDA e MI6 IIa ■ II 11 : ODDD o� u�■ =i zb SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 12-01-17 DD CUSTOM RESIDENCE 2929 NORTH OCEAN BLVD. GULFSTREAK FLORIDA e D m m T O C cn m X m D m m r m D 0 z AV 4: m r m D O z 05 u § g y SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 12-01-17 Q N bWIMON AVE OFIAAV 7 m n 0o m I � - 3 v m r m D O z 05 u § g y SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 12-01-17 Q N bWIMON AVE OFIAAV 1 IDF01.e_ SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 12-01-17 P•ia'lll.l,f...f�� e 11111AIRANDALL STOFFT CUSTOM RESIDENCE O !1,1Il;11(II{!{i'I ARCHITECTS 2929 NORTli OCEAN BLVD. EIlfti����1�it9l�� dletinct1w. Inspirational. architeaturo. GULFSTREAM, FLORIDA n senna, �vr msw �r ry nw da a.os.. IN: O 's���saa�+i+is�stssr�s e g � c VC2�r 9 G� ��� N MggF. 6 i kk p ®-, 4 tl pp m 0 iY g GQ a; - E 5ws e � a F� 6Y e a g —J— e c VC2�r 9 iY A TLANT/C OCEAN F� 93 HIM g� 9 V Mt 114 41 1 fi i 1111 F2 R N $ r r r r b b It It A W N 41 b m b b roz� o zz � F`oo �I Irl O yy J dd dd d N O J y � teoBYfi O - �� ~ E664F 2929 CUSTOM RESIDENCE 2929 NORTH OCEAN BLVD. GULFSTREAM , FLORIDA PERMIT PLANTING PLAN, LIST AND DETAILS s : F a� {Vf W g 5�i f � R {(j3 iE R{F 3 +_ y E r g F p i i R R q• S+ 4 4 4. 4 L� L� ;�� �� a qq i pf Egg �t t 2929 CUSTOM RESIDENCE 2929 NORTH OCEAN BLVD. GULFSTREAM , FLORIDA PERMIT PLANTING PLAN, LIST AND DETAILS s : F a� {Vf W MhTLlLIrE Li 1 / LP-] MATLHJIe Li' -I / LR] �� rt `7 it ®3 �K Y . L2�4 IO ® —_— y�.. i Ef fl, Hid ikn � � q coin u�TMucnoN _ n _ 9 v I I oam»anw n m k @ '811 11:1 8$ � 5 1 '�so'+^L H r,Tm Lire 2 FE 5 ! �!I 1 a 9 f m vgF'°��r �i int E� ?5;e ° B - b ■� - � y ffq e� y.Er � ia��v ■gP�� ?�6� [RJR oil pll 16 •� `� ! 6i E d GE 33 Sa 6& o ; i( 7f3gSlF ° fill 3, 4 M c x ; F s m _ pp r 77c - -Fre: 2 �<y jlccc8 � r o}l:e 2929 CUSTOM RESIDENCE 2929 NORTH OCEAN BLVD. GULFSTREAM , FLORIDA PERMIT PLANTING PLAN, LIST AND DETAILS is r d 1. Ip Its,; � �3.t�,.•:,, �■: i jIII \ tllll �3'i�lllll ♦. 1 .�. II . `.' /'� oil !a y: VIEW - AL I I'�IIII l:::ill" WHO �II! N r CD 1.] G w o m a n rro i�0 m t n a a 9 $$° �is goviys o�p @F c -�� ac a'4_7q>u €B a'. $g:@=ar Fo°o aQiy° ¢5 €T 6 y�_ g 4 $ g e R i g @ Y &�i�F. r,s @i o v AA SA ' p� i`3'-� 8 ' sR� a j.S g9U P ag11aU 11-9 `^R�,� iv ¢� i4��4 u �^ FE ga , s F�=�g r;SS S.� ¢•d A A % s9 Ca§ •r§'3 ngga Y R§F6@= 4Pl[ ¢ i _€ eiF , ig g Rq ; 6R aQg. s gas> >_ 'ig. Q 'g9sy c g= - R z cy� 3R9 ai gcR9g i E 3isRg�g 6A� ¢¢¢ u¢ g gQ a 40 ¢^e a�%� 5p= rSy� •R ¢ �9R o e 'fl4 ��d gyySS dgfi'q Yu} al R�A¢R! ¢ RR g 3 S Y J'" .RRp Q A:i �d RxE R¢R rpsi £ 42 g¢3d Y iR!` Ai'ioFa Z4 ?R ¢¢ a g Qgg ge ° �g$� 39 g ;aas"- $¢a 9yA �y; Y 6g'6g >a ¢FY^ h $gJ 4 i l Sg 16 R•Fs R:6 ¢ 0•.2 S 111 ii�'„ s� %" i@�@� {g$gZ s�"¢ s:dy�g.� is g a F gs$�3$S °� � • jd: 3 i�° fiR� � O� s`¢ d'� sS�F W g g �A �� �¢ y@g a A� a„%; saC H`� �!! � ° �¢] �Fd rg Cggq • � 3 $F (� �D Qg QQ 3R�g Q ��'g s �r �� a Q :9:�i¢-g,�a3, de g :���@ o'��-gg'ygs'I�r ¢�_• � e I�s A`,� r ' ii �F �sF�S3�g.SeC Arg- 'gc rR S Cea��¢RYss % � 3o R° _i RS R`g >w fill D¢ :% i � . ¢ -1 Drs�gg �x g ¢R1. g-_1 aE 9$ ¢ @RF $A aI° Y $fig '@§ o I¢ ¢ @ p r i A F. •g=A -g 3a aQ t3;� I@lig Q' II., v� o g s gQ N w g 3 s e € m -4 F! ¢„ :JIFF >� e¢ F£ p¢ ;Si ;g �¢ '-g3�� e$ �•'Q 3 � DY 4`AD 'Q- p: � 'g�� �.aa �i¢sF^ Q e +F sR g'_ fags All sR [ F ¢ °�_ a r g@ = ia�a=Ba• = 3a iF °` irk_ .n Qga aai �q F¢s�d-_a-D g$4 g g $ v � ,�¢ 401 • @¢£ �eaq: 4 F ? SiQQ tata�€a�m gfi s¢r i s ¢g sA� ¢ a S 4w i iR'_ 41111 C1 F . SR r > 4 >„wci g _ ¢ e� Q9A@gQag @ 4i`: 9e @ ic g€ gg il' ap ¢`8 S$�` �3i 7Qg•°=R Y °se_ , d gqy AA 4�� z_aI -Qa.•¢ F3 3 BD S• ipc -o 3 = u3 Fg3%��gcc ll ° Ra-� d @ g as i g R % @ g sgg_ a. -Ill aF c'w� aggs R _ a g z �¢ 3 RS , g �3g Q, g !i¢ R4 g`or gQF ¢�09 pa Y a F ui �di wx �C�4� q • _Q iR� ¢sF Rq" %: s= a it° a e _�: gag QQY R°= ;gagQ¢{• �g gsg-. Ca g s s a Q s D g- Q Sa� s$- x y ¢, ¢ Ra . a3 g 3 9 ° rte- R B -o Ytgga fig_ �y & g gQ ssd� $a 5$ QS3pA @R F d��¢t,4?. a. ww a; y{ g-3 gs ii g n� 2 q Y i a g& gY�°j 4 °i gAg FIR EqY ggD lug FR R 3y ¢a = is. d a^ ¢ g 3 s Rp Rg S- ° ¢•9s g d y IR g a. - ¢g a- ;q@ 9agaA°'s RQ §� 3� 1Q;o9p ¢f3 9�aaga "p��Q¢w$$ o@ Ill ;p$s ¢q;I¢ $ iSIasi, 2 dgD i'I u s� 4�5. s a C 4 R Cis °@@ QYF y @' �a IIa g ag- '�i@3 a g gay p g¢ey¢ gE A= is i 3q sa -w Ci g° p8egaf y gQ a eQ¢ a�sg ggdgQ :e Q 1 I � :» 1l gs g ^¢a a^ Ie ig ywg S -g¢_ 9i a F 'cS • $9 g�rAA a i g2 ap a Qig g .i i QJRJ Qxy ¢ ¢ F 4ei@_a�w g pgC a }} ._ggRF6s Rap¢ F g i=e sg iRg ; r T ksdI DA =¢g� �L �� i DaQ�_gI¢4?¢cies b;q Sg@gp E� �ka¢ S tR ��.Q g� ��q aT�yaS�s��D�9 3 C F ¢ i. � $ 'a' $•4'iiYo � S� ¢F• F � m'1 A@� � pp �i� �_Y� Ra 1 . o a3 C,. D B •• �_ .� a o _= F, •� w = F €'e. a p @ 'a 3Fs° F" gs @_ ' 4 i@ a 33 9 cf i- a -�R @ pSr iWilli stag ¢ @ o �g:¢ai=�s ;�¢ ga�R-gF� og €s� @ g�gag$a tg¢g� is §g¢ a% Ss g�9yy°R=a 3 _s= g= a. i a,E� n 1° $$ S sdgY a¢s@ ? a¢:_ 4Q@ @ c9¢g @�zF YR4� $ TF i it T n V T p A T> T n m Qg fag d3 gang e� st'Q� Q' v ¢F s g�� gI 19 g� IQgee.9 R a A_ r `pgi �R >p� Rg s�'gsBe 1�¢�'gq Q5 R� ri Fg.ga4� sYo aySs r@t I Ell liltQ a@ egsa SAR£� � 4 s aS°� g''4z 9 ft R c4a�gF�g i5� Fa tRe 9F F° Rg its fag; g�e•3 �� �§F�y � �R �3p�s �� fip glo `��.-pg lit'�p g4 ¢ReR RgRAi�" �9 ti 'V I _ 9,R gi n� R iY . @$ @F @^ g -:e $ag Hill % �3 �oRa Rf¢€ a&3 ut ¢ F iY t o g @ Q Dg IeI $ ¢� :r hil a cQ a kf AF} scan R. E g CSR °i gg Q Q6gv # g 3 Fq As a 4111 it m3 api_r y r'@qRa F 4 g Fgg@¢R@ u, gg% i�a1Ay 4a i555"R.s PQ % o� s=3� 'i�� 3g3a ,33 '�D-a 'y� �y• z 4s�ycy g Q 0 4 2929 CUSTOM RESIDENCE 2929 NORTH OCEAN BLVD. GULFSTREAM , FLORIDA PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS Yi - a 'f ae r ;ic6s � 0 4 2929 CUSTOM RESIDENCE 2929 NORTH OCEAN BLVD. GULFSTREAM , FLORIDA PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS TOWN OF GULF STREAM ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING REPORT Application #:17-08 Owner: Adrie & Kristina Ermers Address: 800 Canary Walk Agent: Matt Wolf, Edgewater Building Group Proposed Improvement: A revision to approved plans regarding Landscaping; Style of Outside Lights and to the Chain Link Fence Installation. Approvals Requested: Landscape Revisions: For site landscape revisions considered by the staff to be major modifications. Style Revisions to Outside Lighting: For a complete change in the style of outside light fixtures. Chain Link Fence Installation: Gross Lot size: 23,224 SF Proposed Total Floor Area: 6,654 SF Zoning District: RS -P Finished Floor: 7.5' NGVD Issues Considered During Review: For the installation of the landscaping along the inside of a chain link fence rather than the outside of the chain link fence. Effective Lot Area: 23,224 SF Allowable: 7,245 SF Height: 28.5' (roof height <_ 30' Preferred) Section 66-166 Violation of condition of approval Section 70-187.6 Table of district standards - Fences Section 70-216 Generally - Spanish Mediterranean architectural style Notes: The original application was approved with the condition that "any minor modification in the landscape plan shall be submitted to the Town Manager for review and approval and any major modifications shall be brought back to the ARPB for review and approval, prior to commencement of landscaping". Upon final inspection by the Town staff, it found modifications to the approved landscape plan had occurred without any notification to the staff. It is the staff's opinion that the modifications made to the approved plan are major and require ARPB approval. The plant count on the original plan approved by the town is 854. The plant count on the as -built landscape plan is 557. 2. The original application was approved with an exterior pendant light fixture and a matching exterior wall mounted light fixture. Upon final inspection of the light fixtures, the staff found that the style of the exterior lighting fixtures was completely modified with a new design. 3. The new chain link fencing was installed along the sides of the house without obtaining a fence permit. Landscaping was added on the inside of the fence for screening requirements. However, the code requires that screening of fencing be placed on the outside of the fence to screen the it from their neighbor's view and to screen the fence from public and private roadways. :suoisinag uopelle;sul aaua3 3IM'1 uietlD :sam4xi,3 Suptl2i'1 apis;no o; suoisinag alX4S :suoisinag aduaspuu7 SiOZ'ZLfaunuuj :a;eQ,•I• :suoisinag uouullu;sul aauad �fm-1 IIPND :saan;x13 !EttptjS17 apis;no o; s¢otsTnag al,(IS :suoisieag aduaspue7 :uopav 6LOZ 'SZ aaquTaaa(l :a;ea gdHV uopellu;stn aqua; dull uruga atl; to uopeailipotu atp 3o Iutuop puaunuoaai o; uopow •uopelle;stn tlans 2tnpaeSaz s;uatuaiinba.T apoa atp o; su palasunoa uaaq anuq pinont Aatp';nzuad oaua; u .To; paildde;ueailddu atp peel •aaual atp 2uiile;sui azolaq;nuzad aauaj u zol,ilddujou pip ;ueoildde atly •tuuagS;Ino;o umoy atp u! Ipmad u sazinbaz aauaj a to uopelle;sui atLL ;uatuannbaz BuivaaTas atp;aauT o; uopu;aBaA atp;ueldai .To aaual atp zatpia anouT o; aq pino v, zona ag; a;u2p1tu o; sanpeuaa;lu atly •aaual dull tnutla a .Tol;uauTaainba.T Suru aaas atp ;aauT;ou pip ;i'aaola.Tatp 'aaua3 ag; to apisui atp uo pa;ueld sunt Suideaspuel aq4 'asm sitp ul •s,iumpuoz a;enud pue :)ggnd tuozg puu smain zogtl2iau uiozq aaual atl; suaazas ;i;utp tlans pa;ueld 2uiduospuul Aq pauaa.Tas si;i 3l pamollu XTuo si 2uiaua; 3lm uiegD •£ sam;xtl Suptl2l1 atp o; suopeailipotu ayjo leivap puauTtuoaa.T o; uoi;ow -ural atp BuRlnsuoa;notpint'al i;s luxTt;oa;igDxe Io A:)uajsisuoa ule;uietu;ou op;etl; SDIMXil atp ;o alfgs atp asuetlo ,illuzapeliun o; asotla s.Taumo alp 'Ienozddu atp o;;uanbasgnS •alS4s lem;aa;itlaau atp ;o Aiilunb pue as;oeauilo pansap atp uiu;uieui'uoTmildde letnS!jO atp ui itlaTu pue aauneo atp iq pa}uasazd se sazTT;xil Buptl$il atp;eg; uonndo s IIe}s atp si aI 'Z suopuai .polu aduaspuel atp to IenoTdde puatummai o; uopoW glue; apdas atp Io uopeaol a;etugIn atp ,�q iTussaaau apetu iuntanup atp ;o apis;sam aip uo Studuaspuel to uoponpaa atly .;ol ;ueaer atp puu XuAuISTH luzapa3 uiozg asnotl atp ao319UTUaa.Tas a;uipaUWM sapirozd auil aaual;saAi atp uo easoN WMID JOJ sugecI eaazy;o uopn;i;sgns lupzed ally •asnotl atp o; .loop >Iaeq pue Laze food atp ao; 2uivaaaas aaotu apirozd eadu )Iaap flood atp jo tpnos Xla;eipaunui suoisirag :uuld adeaspuel leui2i.To atp tuozj suoisiraj ailiaads aanp iplm saaz3u;lu;s aq,L •ti :suot;upuauTuloaau 33u4s Z aged SLOZ'ZL Azenue j Jy'LiOZ'SZ aagtuaaaCl SO -GO # alld ud-av pzeog SunTueld pue rtairag Iean;aa;igz)jV Town of Gulf Stream TOWN OF GULF STREAM RECEIVED DEC 12017 Town of Gulfstream, FL APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL This form is to be used for all development review applications to be heard by the Town of Gulf Stream Architectural Review and Planning Board, Board of Adjustment, and/or Town Commission. To complete the form properly, please review the accompanying Town of Gulf Stream Instruction Manual for Application for Development Review Form. Failure to complete this form properly will delay its consideration. ARPB File 11 / %- ak To be completed by all applicants. PART II. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Project Information I.A.1. Project/Owner Name:_ ; s 7"" pf I.A.2. Project Address: _ 4a C- „, �7 ) ( lam I.A.3. Project Property Legal Description: 0(o- A Sole; 1 47- 2`1 4 L. )Lce Icy T'T ©F U3o I.A.4. Project Description (describe in detail, including # of stones, etc.) I.A.5. Square Footage of New Structure or Addition: Architectural Style: /'210d J rerro. , P ter.. 1.A.6. Check all that apply: 'WArchilectural/Site Plan Review ❑ Land Clearing ❑ North Ocean Boulevard Overlay (complete section B) ❑ Demolition of Structures O Non-residential uses ❑ Variance (complete section G) D Special Exception (complete section E) 1.A.7. (a) Proposed F.F.E B. Owner Information I.B.1. Owner Address: �C.-`s-� cl 20(0- 1.6.2. Owner Phone Number: 1.B.3. Owner Sianalure• C. Agent Information Type of Foundation: of -31Z-7 -3z5-.544Y L')/ ((<— I.C.1. Agent Name and Firm Name: /22rr GJo) _ To(gew r P� 3 (oR ` � G.� P I.C.2, Agent Address: QS'c: - KP P / �wc l� r o I.C.3. Agent Phone Number: (o) 6- /-7S2-7pDd cell -y Gsr26 Fax 1.C.4. Aaent Sinnahiro• 9 Pre -App Date:....... � -" � ljy ARPB Dal: App Date: Recommendation: Cam Date: _ TC Date: Decision: Application for Development Approval Form ADA.2000 revised 6/13100 Page 2 Town of Gulf Stream PART III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION To be completed by all applicants after pre -application conference with Town Staff. Please be concise but brief. Attach additional sheets only when necessary and be sure to include the appropriate and complete question number for each response. A. Project Description and Justification III.A.1. In what zoning district is the project site located? R S — P III.A.2. Is the project compatible with the intent of the zoning district? r8 Yes ❑ No Explain. III.A.3. Is the project consistent with the Future Land Use Map and goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan? @i'Yes ❑ No Explain. III.A.4. How are ingress and egress to the property to be provided? III.A.5. How are the following utilities to be provided to the property? a. Stormwaler Drainage p,. 13 b. Sanitary Sewer c. Potable Water C r T' d. Irrigation Water C r t e. Electricity �p� L f. Telephone g. Gas h. Cable Television C --cos r III.A.6. If the project involves the erection of one or more structures, please describe how the structures are consistent with the criteria in Section 66-144 of the Town of Gulf Stream Code. (Attach additional sheet if necessary.) PART IV. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Section A is to be completed by all applicants after pre -application conference with Town staff. Answering "Yes" to any question in Section A requires the completion of additional Sections as indicated. A. Additional Approvals/Requirements IV.A.1. Does the project involve land area within fifty feet (50') of the AIA (North Ocean Boulevard) right-of- way? ❑ Yes D<No (If "Yes", section B of this part must be completed.) IV.A.2. Does the project involve the demolition of one or more structures? ❑ Yes A"No (If "Yes", section C of this part must be completed.) IV.A.3. Does the project involve the clearing or filling of any portion of an existing vacant lot or more than fifty percent (50%) of the landscaped area of a developed lot? ❑ Yes 0 No (If "Yes", section D of this part must be completed.) IV.A.5. Does the project require approval of a Special Exception? ❑ Yes 'rf' No (If "Yes", section E of this part must be completed.) IV.A.6. Is the project at variance with any regulations contained in the Zoning Code? ❑ Yes VNo (If "Yes", section G of this part must be completed.) Application for Development Approval Form ADA.32000 Page 3 Town of Gulf Stream B. Projects Requiring North Ocean Boulevard Overlay Permit /.V f4- IV.B.1. What significant landscape features or architectural features are to be disturbed or added and to what extent? IV.B.2. Describe the need and justification for the disturbance/addition: IV.B.3. Will the disturbance/addition destroy or seriously impair visual relationships among buildings, landscape features and open space, or introduce incompatible landscape features or plant material that destroys or impairs significant views or vistas within the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District? Yes No Explain: IV.B.4. How is the design consistent with the AM Landscape Enhancement Project? IV.B.5. What mitigation is proposed so that the disturbance/addition has the least impact possible to the visual and aesthetic quality of the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District: C. Projects Requiring a Demolition Permit IV.C.1. When are the existing structures to be demolished? IV.C.2. When are the proposed structures to be constructed? IV.C.3. What is the landmark status of the structures to be demolished? D. Projects Requiring a Land Clearing Permit IV.D.1. Describe those vegetative materials of B inches in diameter and greater to be North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District: IV.D.2. Describe the need and justification for the removal/relocation: IV.D.3. How is the removal from the project site of vegetation to be mitigated: IV.D.4. How are the remaining and relocated vegetative materials to be protected and preserved during the land clearing and constriction activities and thereafter? IV.D.5. What replacement materials are proposed? Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 4 February 2002 E. Projects Requiring a Special Exception, 'V -E-1. Is the proposed use a permitted special exception use? IV.E.2. How is the usegned, � Yes ❑ No Code Section: - locatc eed d� d proposed to be operated so that the public health, safely, welfare, and morals will be pro e IV.E.3. Will the use cause substantial injuryy be located? ❑Yes ❑ No to the value of other propert in the neighborhood where it is to Explain. IV.E.4. How will the use be compatible with adjolning development and the character of the District wh is to be located? ere it IV.E.5. What landsca landscaping g and screening are provided? IV.E.6. Does the use conform with all applicable regulations located? 1:1 Yes ❑ No governing the District wherein it is to be F. Non -Residential Projects and Residential Projects of Greater than 2 Units IV.F.1. If common area facilities are to be provided, describe them and how they are to be maintained. IV.F.2. If recreation facilities are to be provided, describe them and their potential impacts on surrounding Properties. IV.F.3. For each of the following, list the number provided and their dimensions. Loading Spaces: Standard Parking Spaces: Small Car Parking Spaces: Handicapped Parking Spaces; Drlveways/Aisles: Application for Development Approval Form ADA.32000 Page 5 Tbwn'of Gulf Stream G. Projects Requiring a Variance (code Section 66-150 through 157) IV.G.1. From what specific Zoning Code regulation is a variance requested? IV.G.2. What does the Zoning Code require for this specific site? IV.G.3. What is proposed? IV.G.4. What is the total variance requested? IV.G.5. The following 8 mandatory variance findings from Section 66-154, must be addressed: (Attach additional sheet if necessary.) (1) What specific conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district? (2) Did the special conditions and circumstances result from the actions of the applicant? Yes No (3) Will granting the variance confer upon the applicant any special privilege that is denied by the Zoning Code to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? Yes No Explain: (4) How would a literal interpretation of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the same terms of the ordinance and work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant? (5) Is the Variance requested the minimum variance that makes possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure? Yes No Explain: (6) Will granting the variance permit any prohibited use to be established or re-established: Yes No (7) Is the requested variance consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the future Land Use Map of the adopted Comprehensive Plan? Yes No (8) Will the variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? Yes No Explain: Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 6 February 2002 H. Projects Requiring Rezoning IV.H.1. What is the Future Land Use designation of the project site? IV.H.2. If the project involves a rezoning, Zoning Code text change, Future Land Comprehensive Plan text change, or any combination thereof, justification for the request. Use Map change, Please describe the need and PART V. OPTIONAL INFORMATION This entire Part is optional for all applicants. Applicants are encouraged, but not required, to provide any additional relevant information regarding the project that was not covered elsewhere on this form or on any of the other materials submitted with the application. Application for Development Approval Form ADA. 2000 revised 6/8/00 Page 7 I 4. a. | Er \ } �t \ E7@«5E32m}\ k i 0 3 \ § M 0 ■ C CL $\;§$f\{ } � §) 92'a!!;!I( 2 / \ 21 � | Er \ } �t \ E7@«5E32m}\ k i 0 3 \ § M 0 ■ C CL � 92'a!!;!I( 2 / | Er \ } �t \ E7@«5E32m}\ k i 0 3 \ § A M Gmail Fence Werner Lindner <wlindnerfl@aol.com> To: Kristina Ermers <kristinaermers@gmail.com> Hello, No problem at all. Just go ahead. We will be back in october to enjoy the new fence. Werner & Gabi Werner Lindner 810 Canary Walk Gulfstream, FL 33483 Am 10.07.2017 um 19:31 schrieb Kristina Ermers <kristinaermers@gmail.com>: Kristina E <kristinaermers@gmail.com> Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:46 PM >> Werner & Gabrielle, >> We hope you both are well! » >> We are nearing the end of the construction of our home. We anticipate moving in sometime in August. >> With that in mind, we are at the point now of replacing the deteriorated fence that borders our properties. The service doing the replacement would like to take out the portion that borders your property next week (week of the 17th) and replace it with a new fence as well. Please let us know if this is an issue. The company will be very sensitive to your properties landscaping as they do the replacement. >> Hope to see you soon! >> Best, >> Kristina & Ardie Ermers >> Kristina Sutton Ermers >> PH 561.325.5488 >> Sent from myiPhone b> RECEIVED 4 DEC 0 12011 Town of Gulfstream, FL t M Gmail Fence Kristina E <kristinaermers@gmail.com> NICK VENTURA <nickventura@comcast.net> Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:00 PM Reply -To: NICK VENTURA <nickventura@comcast.net> To: Kristina Ermers <kristinaermers@gmail.com> Cc: ardieermers@gmail.com, michelle <m.dailyventura@gmail.com>, Matt Wolf <mattw@edgewaterbg.com> Hi Kristina, So, does that mean you were able to remove the dead Ficus without removing the fence? If so - Awesome! Nick On July 10, 2017 at 2:34 PM Kristina Ermers <kristinaermers@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Nick, As I mentioned we are here at the house now. The company was actually able to repair the fence at your end of the property instead of pulling it out and replacing. We have to replace the fence that borders the Matthews house but not yours. Landscaping will remain as I mentioned in my previous emails. Best, Kristina Kristina Sutton Ermers PH 561.325.5488 Sent from my iPhone On Jul 10, 2017, at 2:17 PM, NICK VENTURA <nickventura@comcast.net> wrote: Thanks Kristina, All sounds good. We have a bit of a dilemma on our side since it's so tight over there. We may not do plantings on our side and opt for a solid fence of some kind. Just an FYI. Hope all goes well! 01513 On July 10, 2017 at 2:07 PM Kristina Ermers <kristinaermers@gmail.com> wrote: �o- RECEIVED Hi Nick & Michelle, DEC 0 12011 Please see answers to your questions below fay,+!^ if Gulfstream, FL Kristina Sutton Ermers PH 561.325.5488 Sent from my iPhone On Jul 10, 2017, at 1:58 PM, NICK VENTURA <nickventura@comcast.net> wrote: Hi Kristina, Congratulations on the project nearing completion! We knew that a fence replacement was on its way, I didn't know it was this soon! I thought that we might work together on this property border, but understand your likely strong desire to be finishedl We had debated what type of fence we actually wanted in that location and were prepared to do some shopping on our next visit this summer. So my questions are the following: 1) What type of fence are you installing? New chain link approx 5 ft high 2) Depending on type, what type of plantings are you doing? Colusa along fence 3) If the fence is not to our liking will you be offended if we install a different fence on our side? You can do whatever you'd like. We just needed to replace the fence since it has deteriorated and we wanted to make sure we had stability for the colusa as it grows for privacy. We anticipate the colusa growing to approx 8ft and we will maintain it at that height on our property. 4) How tall is the proposed fence? 5) Will the planting be higher or lower than the fence? 6) Will you be removing all the plants bordering the existing fence? The fence was entangled with dead weeds so yes. We could not remove the weeds without removing the fence. 7) We have existing irrigation and mosquito control system lines in the ground on the border. Installers will be to be very careful not to disrupt them. We are here now and will make sure the company does not disrupt these lines. Thanks for answering our questions! Best, Nick & Michelle On July 10, 2017 at 1:12 PM Kristina Ermers <kristinaermers@gmail.com> wrote: Nick & Michelle, We hope you both are well! We are nearing the end of the construction of our home finally. We anticipate moving in sometime in August. With that in mind, we are at the point now of replacing the deteriorated fence that borders our properties. The service doing the replacement would like to take out the portion that borders your property today and replace it with the new fence this Thursday, July 13th. We don't believe you are in town but if you are, please let us know if this is an issue. The company will be very sensitive to your properties landscaping as they do the replacement. Hope to see you soon! Best, Kristina & Ardie Ermers Kristina Sutton Ermers PH 561.325.5488 Sent from my iPhone M Gmail Fence Kristina E <kristinaermers@gmail.com> Kristina Ermers <kristinaermers@gmail.com> Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:02 PM To: George and Karen Mathews <georgeandkarenl0@gmail.com> Cc: Matt Wolf <mattw@edgewaterbg.com>, Ardie Ermers <ardieermers@gmail.com> George & Karen, Just a quick update to my previous email regarding the fence. Our contractor is saying the company may want to remove the portion of the fence that borders your property as soon as tomorrow if thats ok. I failed to mention in my previous email that the new fence will be approx 5 ft high and we will be putting up clusia along the fence which we would like to top off at approx 8ft. once grown. We also were able to cut down the tree that we know is a nuisance to you with all the dead leaves infringing on your property. We hope that provides some relief :) Best, Kristina PH: +1 561.325.5488 Email: kristinaermers@gmail.com [Quoted text hidden] RECEIVED DEC 0 12017 Town of Gulfstream, FL *J1 Fence Kristina E <kristinaermers@gmail.com> George and Karen <georgeandkaren10@gmail.com> Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:02 PM To: Kristina Ermers <kristinaermers@gmail.com> Kristina: Thanks so much for the update. Feel free to move ahead on whatever timeline works for you. P.S. Your house is beautiful! Karen From: Kristina Ermers [mailto:kristinaermers@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:03 PM To: George and Karen Mathews Cc: Matt Wolf; Ardie Ermers Subject: Re: Fence [Quoted text hidden] M Gmail Kristina E <kristinaermers@gmail.com> Fence Kristina Ermers <kristinaermers@gmail.com> Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:36 PM To: George and Karen <georgeandkaren10@gmail.com> Karen, Thank you so much! You are so kind. Looking forward to finally getting in and settled so we can have the two of you over for a drink! Best, Kristina PH: +1 561.325.5488 Email: kristinaermers@gmail.com [Quoted text hidden] Sec. 70-3. Purpose. (a) (1) This chapter is intended to serve as a guide for preserving and perpetuating the unique residential character of the town. It addresses various topics regarding the development of compatible single-family homes (new or additions) in the town. It outlines Urban Design Studio's background research and findings, and identifies characteristics that are unique to the town. (2) The chapter is designed to meet the needs of a variety of users: property owners, architects, building contractors, and landscape contractors, as well as city officials, members of the Architectural Review and Planning�Board (AR.PB), the town commission and staff; and the general public. (3) The chapter is also intended to be utilized in conjunction with the Gulf Stream Land Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan! Together these documents provide a framework which can foster creative design approaches and solutions. (b) As a design manual, the information and illustrations contained in this chapter address and respond to the opportunities for enhancing and preserving the visual environment of the town. The design standards in this chapter are, by specific intent, illustrative rather than prescriptive. They do not dissect every architectural influence, nor do they attempt to prescribe specific, detailed ways to handle every type of alteration to existing structures. They do, however, provide the town with a methodology and common framework for reviewing submissions and attaching conditions, if any, to project approvals. (c) In addition to the design standards' contained in this chapter, for convenience, the specific mandatory land development regulations are included to facilitate an overall understanding of the review criteria to which new construction is subject. Sec. 704. How to use this manuaL (a) Organization. This chapter is organized into nine articles. The user is encouraged to read the chapter in its entirety. This chapter is a full part of the town's land' development regulations and has the same force and effect of all other provisions contained therein. (1) Articles III and IV_ . Article M, Use Regulations, and article N, Site Development Regulations, contain land development regulations which are mandatory and apply to all of the single-family zoning districts. These are the typical zoning -type regulations found in most other codes. (2) Articles V through VIII. Articles V through VDI provide design standards and establish a basis for review and approval of all new single-family construction or remodeling. Article V, Areawide Standards, applies to all single-family homes in the town. Provisions with respect to Gulf Stream -Bermuda and Mediterranean Revival architecture (see article VD) are not applicable if an alternate architectural design is selected. The reader is encouraged, however, to become familiar with their provisions in that they are the preferred styles in most of the town. . (3) Article VI. Article VI, District Standards, provides more specific design direction for the five single-family zoning districts established in this chapter. The user should identify the applicable district and should study it carefully to ensure that the unique characteristics of and appropriate design direction for that district are incorporated into any design proposal. r (4) Article VII. Article VII, Predominant Architectural Styles, contains design standards for Gulf Stream -Bermuda and Mediterranean Revival styles of architecture. As discussed, these styles are not mandatory but are indicative of the predominant styles within the community. (5) Article VIII Article VDI, Supplemental Development Regulations, addresses elements such as antennas, that sometimes are tacked on to homes that otherwise display good design character- istics. Standards for these elements are provided in this article. (c) Design standards. The design standards in this chapter provide the town with a methodology and common framework for reviewing submissions for project approvals. The design standards contained herein are either mandatory or discretionary. The terms "required" and "prohibited" are mandatory. The terms "preferred" and "discouraged" are discretionary. These terms are defined below: (1) Required. a. Required items are design elements that are necessary in order to maintain the desired character and quality of the zoning district within which they are located. b. Compliance is mandatory for project approval. (2) Preferred. a. Preferred items are design elements that, whenever possible, should be used in order to maintain the desired character and quality of the zoning district within which they are located. These items are those typically found in the town and which, in combination with other preferred items, define the existing and desired character of the town and the zoning districts. Preferred items are thought to comply with the following goals with respect to desired zoning district character and quality: L Consistency of neighborhood character. 2. Consistency of architectural style. 3. Consistency of building form and mass. 4. Consistency of materials and colors. 5. Consistency of location of elements. b. Incorporating preferred items into a design increases the probability of,"but does not assure, project approval. (3) Discouraged. a.. Discouraged items are design elements that should not be used in order to maintain the desired character and quality of the zoning district within which they are located. These items are not typically found in the town and detract from the existing and desired character of the town and the zoning districts. Discouraged items are thought to not comply with the following goals with respect to desired zonin& district character and quality I. Consistency of neighborhood character. 2. Consistency.of architectural style. 3. Consistency of building form and mass. 4. Consistency of materials and colors. 5. Consistency of location of elements. b. Incorporating discouraged items into a design decreases the probability of -project approval and may result in project denial. In order for a discouraged item to be approved, applicants must show, and the town must'find, that the proposed item is not inconsistent with the above goals. The use of more than three discouraged items on any property is prohibited. (4) Prohibited. a. Prohibited items are design elements that do not maintain the desired character or quality of the zoning district within which they are located and are not permitted under current codes or regulations. , b. The use of more than three discouraged items on a property is prohibited. C. Use of prohibited elements mandates project denial. (d) Additional standards and criteria, Please note that the chapter constitutes only one small subsection of the Land Development Regulations found in this Code. While compliance with the standards found in articles I through VIII of this chapter is essential to final project approval, compliance with several additional standards and criteria also may he necessary before a building permit can be issued. Accordingly, users of this chapter are strongly advised to familiarize themselves with all federal, state and/or town regulations that might apply to a particular type of project. To assist in determining which town regulations may apply, users are encouraged to review the tables and flow chart contained ,in section 70-297 of this chapter. Users also are encouraged to direct questions to, and share information with, town planning staff as early as possible in the plan development stage. ARTICLE V.-AREAWIDE ARTICLE VII. -PREDOMINANT ARTICLEVill.-SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS I ARCHITECTURAL STYLES I DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS DIVISION 1. - GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS Discouraged, Monterey Non-descript, which is to be defined as not having an apparent architectural style including but not limited to vernacular. Sec. 70-98. - Building form. Discouraged: Angular walls as a dominant or repetitive feature Building massing centered on the garage Complex facade treatment (excessive multi -layer step backs) Continuous Flat facades Sec. 70-99. - Roof design, slope and materials. Discouraeed: Roof material uncharacteristic of architectural style or zoning district "S" -shaped tile in some districts Shed roofs Steep slopes (over 45° or 1:1 slope) Very low pitched roofs (less than 18" or 5:12 slope) Sec. 70-100. - Roof and eave heights (One story homes) Discouraged: Entry features: Between 12 and 14 feet Eave heights: Between ten feet six inches and 12 feet Eave lines: Four Roof features: Four visible per building side Roof heights: Between 20 and 24 feet (between 24 and 28 feet for roof features) DIVISION 2. - SPANISH MEDITERRANEAN REVIVAL STYLE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS See. 70-217. - Building form Discouraged, Complex or angular building forms Excessive large windows Excessive ornamentation or use of decorative elements Flat or parabolic arches Sec. 70-218. — Roofs Discouraeed: "S" -shaped tile Skylights Very low pitched roofs (slopes less than 4:12) Sec. 70-219. — Windows Discouraged, Metal or aluminum awnings Shutters on more than half of the windows Windows as a dominant element Sec. 70-220. — Entrances Discouraeed: Solid, unarticulated doors Stained glass sidelights Sec. 70-221. - Exterior materials; colors Discouraged, More than three colors (principal building and trim) Over -use of decorative elements Principal building color not representative of architectural style See. 70-266. - Television antennas; satellite dishes Discouraged, Satellite dishes of 18 inches in diameter or less mounted on front walls or front half of side walls unless absolutely necessary to ensure adequate reception. (2) Satellite dishes of 18 inches in diameter or less mounted on walls higher than 12 feet off of the ground or on roofs unless absolutely necessary to ensure adequate reception. (3) Satellite dishes of 18 inches in diameter or less not mounted under one-story, eaves and adjacent to landscaping screening unless absolutely necessary to ensure adequate reception. (4) Satellite dishes larger than 18 inches that are not ground mounted unless absolutely necessary to ensure adequate reception. (5) Satellite dishes larger than 18 inches visible from off-site unless absolutely necessary to ensure adequate reception. See. 70-267.- Mechanical equipment Discouraeed: Ground -mounted equipment higher than four feet above grade Sec. 70-268. - Front yard accoutrements Discouraged: (ARTICLE V.-AREAWIDE (ARTICLE VII.- PREDOMINANT (ARTICLEVill.-SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS CONTINUED) ARCHITECTURAL STYLES DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS CONTINUED) CONTINUED) (Two story homes) Discouraeed: Entry features: Beachfront and Ocean West Districts -From 14 to 16 feet All other Districts -From 14 to 16 feet Eave heights Beachfront and Ocean West Districts - Between 12 and 14 feet for one-story portions Between 22 feet six inches and 24 feet six inches for two-story portions All other districts -Between ten feet six inches and 12 feet six inches for one- story portions Between 21 feet and 23 feet for two- story portions Eave lines: Five Roof features: Four visible per building side Roof heights: Between 22 feet and 26 feet for one-story portions See. 70-101. — Windows Discouraeed: Windows as dominant element. Bay and bow windows as a prominent or repetitive element or not in scale with building and architectural style. Sliding windows (does not include sliding doors). Between 25 percent and 50 percent of total window opening area on an elevation composed of undivided panes larger than eight square feet. Windows with undivided panes larger than 16 square feet located on the outer face of the building not screened from an off -premise view. More then 50 percent of total window opening area on an elevation composed of undivided panes larger than eight square feet if not covered by a loggia or roof overhang. Commercial types Metal or aluminum awnings Trim color(s) not compatible with principal building color Trim color(s) not compatible with architectural style See. 70-222.- Garages; accessory buildings Discouraged: Different color or material than principal building DIVISION 3. - GULF STREAM - BERMUDA STYLE Discouraged: Angular walls Complex facade treatment (excessive multi -layer step backs) Sec. 70-238. — Roofs Discoraeed: Dormers on single story houses Gable Pyramidal hip (often has too steep of slope) Very low pitched roofs (slope less than 5:12) Sec. 70-239. — Windows Discouraeed: Bay and bow windows as prominent feature Paired and triple windows Palladian window Sliding window Windows as dominant element See. 70-240. — Shutters Discouraged., Board and batten Commercial type Metal or aluminum awnings No shutters Sec. 70-269. — Mailboxes Discouraeed: Non-standard or custom designed boxes approved by the U.S. Postal Service Posts constructed of material other than solid wood or standard metal pipe Brightly painted Unfinished metal other than copper or brass (ARTICLE V.-AREAWIDE (ARTICLE VIL-PREDOMINANT STANDARDS CONTINUED) ARCHITECTURAL STYLES prohibited in all districts except CONTINUED) Non-traditional shutter colors (for Non-traditional colors for Bermuda style example: teal, peach, mustard yellow, architecture, (for example: painted bright royal blue) chocolate brown) Shutters out of scale with window Shutters painted in same color as Sec. 70-106. — Color principal building Shutters painted the same color as the principal building Sec. 70-241. - Entrances Sec. 70-103. — Entrances Discouraged: Discotraeedr Aluminum/metal doors, unpainted Over -elegant entrance/porte-cochere Board and batten door Stained glass sidelights Over -bearing entablature or pediment Sec. 70-104. - Exterior materials Solid, flush door Discouraged: Sec. 70-242. - Exterior materials; colors Vinyl siding (subject to sample approval) Discouraged: Sec. 70-105. - Garages and accessory Brick (other than white) buildings More than three colors (principal Discoumeed, building and trim) All garages facing street on lots over Principal building color not 20,000 square feet not adequately representative of architectural style screened or buffered from roadways Trim color(s) not compatible with Carports architectural style Garage doors that dominate the front Trim color(s) not compatible with principal building color elevation Metal storage sheds Three -car garages facing the street are Sec. 70-244.- Garages; accessory buildings prohibited in all districts except Beachfront and Ocean West Discouraged: Two story screen enclosures Different color or material than Sec. 70-106. — Color principal building Discouraged: Dark stains inconsistent with community character More than three colors (principal building and trim) Non-traditional accent colors—For example: deep orange, bright teal, mustard yellow, bright royal blue Principal building colors not representative of architectural style (ARTICLE VIII. - SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS CONTINUED) (ARTICLE V.-AREAWIDE STANDARDS CONTINUED) Principal building colors not representative of architectural style Trim color(s) and accent colors not compatible with architectural style Trim color(s) not consistent or complementary to principal building color See. 70-107. - Additions and rehabilitations, and replacement of existing features Discouraged: Use of discouraged design elements not present on the existing structure Repainting the exterior of a home in an existing (nonconforming) prohibited color DIVISION 3. - GENERAL LANDSCAPESTANDARDS Sec. 70-148. — Principles Discouraged: Hedges over four feet if located within 15 feet of the IC W W or seaward of the 1978 CCCL Large expanses of impervious driveway materials Sec. 70-169. — Standards Discouraged: Cast iron hardware/fixturcs (deterioration) Flood lights on front or side of residence (except security lights w/motion sensor) Multi -socket spot lights Wall pack (except back) Flood or spotlights illuminating entire building facade. Multi -socket spotlights. Wall packs (except back) (ARTICLE VIII. -SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS CONTINUED) (ARTICLE VIII. - SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS CONTINUED) ARPB Regular Meeting s Public Hearing Held May 22, 2017 @ 8:30 A.M. Mr. Marsh explained that due to the much needed increase in personnel, an addition to Town Hall is being planned. He further explained that the extension is 696 square feet on the west side and will house an office for the Town Manager and one for the Staff Attorney with additional storage space also provided. Mr. Marsh said the administrative side of the building will be reorganized to make better use of the space. The entry lobby will, in addition to an entry area, be furnished to serve as an inviting waiting room, the existing protected entry door will remain with the receptionist immediately inside. He went on to explain that the Clerk's office will move into the current office of the Town Manager, the library will be moved into the current Clerk's office and will also serve as a conference area with the current library to become an office for the Administrative Assistant. The building department will remain in the current location but will have the entire space across the front of the building instead of just one half of the room. Both Mr. Smith and Attorney Randolph asked if any thought had been given to extend the addition the full width of the west side of the building and were advised this had been considered but it was determined that would damage the charm of the building and create just a block. Town Manager Dunham advised that it is necessary to create a secured room for the I T Equipment that is locked at all times and that it must be kept very cool. He said this will be accomplished by removing all of the office supplies and storage materials from this room. a. LEVEL 2 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN REVIEW to permit construction of a 696 sq. ft. addition to the west side of the existing one story, Spanish Mediterranean style town hall. Vice Chairman Smith moved to approve the Level 2 Architectural/Site Plan based on a finding that the proposed 696 sq. ft. addition and materials meet the minimum intent of the zoning codes and applicable review standards. Mr. Roach seconded the motion and all voted AYE at the roll call. VII. Items by Staff. There were no items by staff. VIII. Items by Board Members. A. Elimination of Discouraged Eave Hgts. for 2 story dwellings Chairman Kent reported that there have been many comments from residents that two story homes should not be permitted in the districts having smaller lots with most of the existing homes being single story structures. He believed that the two story structures that are objectionable are the ones that have used the discouraged eave N ARPB Regular Meeting s Public Hearing Held May 22, 2017 @ 8:30 A.M. height between 21 ft. and 23 ft. He favored prohibiting eave heights over 21 ft. in all Districts except Beachfront and Ocean West. Barbara Whittaker, a local realtor, said that she has found that her clients prefer structures that have the 21 ft. eaves. She believed it would be of benefit to the real estate market to not have the taller homes in the smaller districts. Mr. Wietsma said there is no way to build a house with 10 ft. ceilings, which is what the market requires today, with a 21 ft. eave. He said that 3 ft. is needed between floors and when adding that to a 10 ft. ceiling it puts the eave at 23 ft. Chairman Kent said that some of the new houses in Palm Beach are using tray ceilings on the second floor. Mr. Marsh stated it is unusual to use the eave rather than the beam as the bearing point but that is what Gulf Stream uses. This allows for high ground floor ceilings. He said the desired is 1016" allows, with an eave overhang, ceilings of at least 1119", if not more, depending on the pitch of the roof. For the second floor, they like to start with 9 ft. and then "spring up" with the tray ceiling, he said. He didn't believe the 21 ft. impedes getting to spacious heights. Mr. Marsh displayed pictures of a new two story building under construction next to a one story which is creating very poor street appeal. He believed street appeal should be a part of this discussion also as that plays into what is listed in the Code under the Preferred Section for Two Story Homes. He favored a maximum eave height of 21 ft. In answer to a question from Chairman Kent, Attorney Randolph said that the Board would make a recommendation to the Town Commission to change the Code by removing the discouraged eave heights and changing the prohibited section to read "Greater than 21 feet for two-story portions" rather than the existing "Greater than 29 feet 6 inches for two-story portions". The Town Clerk said there had been requests that no recommendations be made until a full board was present. Mr. Smith moved to postpone this matter until such time as there are at least 5 members of the Board present and Mr. Roach seconded the motion with all voting AYE. At being asked, Mrs. Whittaker, Mr. Marsh and Mr. Wietsma agreed to return for this discussion when a full Board is present. Brief discussion addressed the possibility of creating a Special Exception for some eave heights but Mr. Smith was excused from the meeting and a quorum was no longer present. 3