Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout12/10/2002City of Greencastl • City Hall One North Locust Street P.O. Box 607 Greencastle, Indiana 46135 Pamela S. Jones Clerk- Treasurer GREENCASTLE COMMON COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION TUESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2002 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL The Greencastle Common Council met in Regular Session Tuesday, December 10, 2002, 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. Council President Mark Hammer called the meeting to Order at 7:00 p.m. There were no public petitions or comments. Police Chief Hendrich distributed his report at the meeting. Councilor Hammer corrected the November 12, 2002, Regular Session minutes as follows: page three, first paragraph should read: Fire Chief Newgent requested the $1,000.00 to be received from New Market, not Madison Township,......... • Motion to approve minutes with the above correction was made by Councilor Sedlack, seconded by Councilor Liechty. Vote was unanimous. Motion to approve claims was made by Councilor Liechty, seconded by Councilor Hammer. Vote was unanimous. Councilor Roach made the motion to move the discussion of street lighting in Glenview Subdivision and discuss with Ordinance 2002 -18, which addresses stop signs in the same area, seconded by Councilor Rokicki. Vote was unanimous. Putnam County Foundation Executive Director Elaine Peck was present to discuss options for Agreements with the Foundation regarding the Industrial Development Funds, Cemetery Trustee Fund and Cemetery Mausoleum Fund. Councilor Roach made the motion to accept Option One for the Industrial Development Funds, seconded by Councilor Liechty. Vote was unanimous. Cemetery Boardmembers Dr. Brattin and Sue Kreig were present to discuss the Cemetery fund options and stated the Cemetery Board chose options two and three. Councilor Roach made the motion to accept the recommendation of the Cemetery Board, seconded by Councilor Rokicki. Vote was unanimous. Ordinance 2002 -17, An Ordinance Amending the Greencastle Planning and Zoning Ordinance by is Amending the Zoning Map, first reading. Motion to remove from table made by Councilor Sedlack, seconded by Councilor Liechty. Vote was unanimous. Councilor Hammer read Ordinance 2002 -17, stating it has been forwarded to the Council with an " unfavorable recommendation from the Plan Commission. Ben Comer, Attorney for CVS /Cedarwood Development, Inc., stated that they are talking about rezoning an 80 foot strip of land that has to be used to satisfy the parking regulations for the City. On the other side of this 80 foot strip is a Bed and Breakfast, there is also a liquor store, office building, funeral home and a vacant church, all within a block or two. CVS is willing to work with the City and residents to make this a pleasant transition for all. The area is already zoned commercial with a closed gas station and Dairy Castle that will soon be a vacant building once they move east. Property taxes for the three properties now brings in approximately $28,000.00 per year, with one property (CVS) the property taxes will be approximately $80,000.00. There were approximately 1,700 cars per day for the gas station and Dairy Castle - for CVS there will be approximately 975 cars per day and the curb cuts will also be consolidated. Bryan Hansen, Plan Commission President, stated the Plan Commission vote was 8 -1 and feels the vote speaks for itself. Councilor Sedlack stated the vote does not speak for itself and asked for an explanation. Mr. Hansen stated the main thing the members of Plan Commission talked about was putting a business in a historic residential area. City Planner Lisa VonTress stated she feels this is a good project as it allows an economic opportunity for the current owners of Dairy Castle and seems to be a natural transition with the Bed and Breakfast to the west. Planner VonTress further stated that the City's Comprehensive Plan isjust a "footprint" and not written in concrete. Several citizens were present, most spoke against CVS being located in this area for different reasons and a few were for CVS being located there. After much discussion, Councilor Liechty " made the motion to approve Ordinance 2002 -17, seconded by Councilor Hammer. Vote as follows: Councilor Roach, no; Councilor Hammer, yes; Councilor Sedlack, no; Councilor Liechty, yes and Councilor Rokicki, no. Ordinance 2002 -17 fails with a 2 -3 vote. Ordinance 2002 -18, An Ordinance Amending Ordinance 2000 -4, An Ordinance Designating Stop Intersections, second reading. Motion to approve made by Councilor Roach, seconded by Councilor Liechty. Councilor Liechty stated it was his understanding that a engineering study has to be done in order to place stop signs. Attorney Robertson stated this stop sign is warranted by a different section of the WTCD. Vote was unanimous. Bart Spencer, Daniel and Barton Construction, stated he would like to add nicer lighting to the Glenview Subdivision. The difference in cost is $822.00 per year for each of the fourteen lights. It was stated that Deerfield Subdivision had to buy down the difference in the ornamental lighting and it would be expected that Glenview would have to do the same. Councilor Liechty stated that if we can't upgrade all the lights in the city then Glenview would have to pay the $822.00 annual difference. Councilor Roach stated he agrees. Councilor Hammer stated he has figured that Daniel Barton can pay $760.00 per lamp today to pay the difference for 20 years. No decision was made. Ordinance 2002 -19, An Ordinance Amending Section 8 -24 of the Greencastle City Code Regarding Reserved Parking Spaces, second reading. Motion to approve made by Councilor Roach, seconded by Councilor Sedlack. Vote was unanimous. Ordinance 2002 -20, An Ordinance Approving the Vacation of Alley Between 232 and 234 Hillsdale, second reading. Motion to approve made by Councilor Roach, seconded by Councilor Rokicki. Vote was unanimous. Ordinance 2002 -21, An Ordinance Amending the Greencastle Planning and Zoning Ordinance by Amending the Zoning Map, first reading, was read by Presiding Officer Hammer. Woodshire Apartment representative Jeff Ryan stated they are requesting that two parcels of land be combined into one. One parcel is already zoned R -3 and they are requesting the second parcel be rezoned from C -3 to R -3. The apartment complex is designed to house 64 units on 5.6 acres of land. Plan Commission President Bryan Hansen stated the reasons Plan Commission voted against the project are as follows: existing traffic problems, deteriorating roads, existing problems with management at Country Place Apartments (another complex owned by the same company) and a petition against the project signed by 62 homeowners in the area. Several residents spoke against the project. City Attorney Robertson stated the decision cannot be made on current management problems at another complex. The questions should be: "should this property be zoned that way at all ? ". Councilor Rokicki made the motion to deny Ordinance 2002 -21, seconded by Councilor Roach. Vote was unanimous. Resolution 2002 -40, A Resolution Approving the Creation of the Downtown Economic Development Area by the Greencastle Redevelopment Commission, was read by Presiding Officer Hammer. Bill Dory, Director of Greencastle/Putnam County Development Center, stated this will capture the new increment in assessment for the Walden Inn expansion and improvements to O Marvin's Restaurant. Motion to approve made by Councilor Rokicki, seconded by Councilor Sedlack. Vote was unanimous. Resolution 2002 -41, A Resolution Authorizing Transfer of Appropriations in the 2002 Budget of the City of Greencastle. Motion to Waive Reading made by Councilor Rokicki, seconded by Councilor Roach. Motion to approve made by Councilor Liechty, seconded by Councilor Rokicki. Vote was unanimous. Resolution 2002 -42, A Resolution Appropriating Insurance Reimbursement, was read by Presiding Officer Hammer. Motion to approve made by Councilor Roach, seconded by Councilor Sedlack. Vote was unanimous. Presiding Officer Hammer read 2002 Encumbrances. Motion to approve made by Councilor Rokicki, seconded by Councilor Liechty. Vote was unanimous. Motion to change agenda and discuss Support Letter for People Pathway Phase IV at this time was made by Councilor Roach, seconded by Councilor Liechty. Vote was unanimous. Motion to approve Support Letter for People Pathway Phase IV was made by Councilor Liechty, seconded by Councilor Sedlack. Vote was unanimous. Engineer Morrow requested an additional appropriation to purchase traffic counters. Cost of the ® counters is approximately $4,300.00. Council gave consensus to go ahead with purchase. Motion to approve the 2003 Holiday Schedule was made by Councilor Rokicki, seconded by " Councilor Roach. Councilor Roach stated the schedule needs to include the departments that run 24 hours, Mays. Vote was unanimous. Motion to adjourn was made by Councilor Roach at 11:35 p.m., seconded by Councilor Rokicki. Vote was unanimous. ATTEST: c, aw& j Lell Pamela S. Jones, Clerk- easurer Mark Hammer, Presiding Officer " E