Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutMinutes - 2000/09/12 - Regular" PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 12, 2000 INITIATION: 1. CALL TO ORDER Pursuant to the Agenda posted September 8, 2000, Chairman Zovak called the meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, September 12, 2000. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners - Griffiths, Seibert, Capra, Arrighi, Zovak Also Present: City Manager Martin, Community Development Director Dawson and Associate Planner Williams 4. TIME FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO SPEAK: None " 5 " " CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner Seibert moved to approve the Consent Calendar, as submitted, seconded by Commissioner Griffiths, and unanimously carried. A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Meeting of August 22, 2000 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None 7. NEW BUSINESS A. PUBLIC HEARING: A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECT WITH FOUR (4) DETACHED UNITS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5226 -5230 SERENO DRIVE Case No.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00- 1428 /TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25963 Site: 5226 -5230 SERENO DRIVE Property Owner: WENDING PEI TRITECH DEVELOPMENT, INC. 735 WEST EMERSON AVENUE, #202 MONTEREY PARK, CA 91754 Planning Commission Minutes September 12, 2000 Page 2 Applicant/ Architect: Engineer: Recommendation: DAPHNE FAN 13501 TRACY STREET, #B BALDWIN PARK, CALIFORNIA 91706 HANK JONG EGL ASSOCIATES, INC. 11823 SLAUSON AVENUE, #1802 SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 1) Hear Staff Report 2) Hear those for and against 3) This project is Categorically Exempt 4) Adopt Resolution Director Dawson summarized the staff report dated September 12, 2000. Associate Planner Williams narrated the videotape of the subject property. Commissioner Seibert inquired as to whether the easement for the flood control was usable by the property owners. Director Dawson stated that there was 16 feet that had been surrendered to the property owners but that the other 84 feet was not usable. Commissioner Seibert inquired as to why the 84 feet was included in the calculations for the plans. Director Dawson stated that it was included as part of the lot. He went on to explain that there was nothing in the Zoning regulations that specified that it must be usable. Commissioner Seibert inquired as to whether there was anything in the Code that required that it must not be used. Director Dawson stated there was nothing in the Code that went either way. He suggested that the Commission may want to consider making calculations on the usable area and not give credit for the Eaton Wash. Commissioner Seibert inquired as to what the floor area ratio would be if the wash were not included in the calculation. Commissioner Griffiths stated that by disallowing the use of that northerly 84 feet, the F.A. R. would be 58 instead of 43. " Planning Commission Minutes September 12, 2000 Page 3 Chairman Zovak clarified that they would be in excess. Director Dawson concurred with Chairman Zovak. Commissioner Griffiths raised additional issues concerning the easement, and discussion was ensued by the. Commission regarding such. Chairman Zovak opened the public hearing and invited interested parties to come forward to speak on the matter. Hank Jonq, Tritech Development, 11823 Slauson Avenue, #18, Santa Fe Springs, stated that he would be willing to go back and re- calculate the square footage of the project, otherwise the conditions of approval were acceptable. Director Dawson inquired of Mr. Jong whether he would be agreeable to a continuance so the Commission could come back and review a finished product. Mr. Jong stated that he would be agreeable to a continuance. Commissioner Griffiths suggested that perhaps Mr. Jong work more closely with the architect to eliminate further miscalculations and inconsistencies. Mr. Jonq explained that it was not that they had not worked closely together, but that the architect did everything by hand whereas his office utilized CAD. Director Dawson pointed out that only one unit was indicated on the tentative map. Mr. Jonq stated that he would correct that. Efrain Garcia, 5129 Sultana Avenue, stated that the power demand for this particular area was already excessive and there were recurring problems with circuit breakers and flickering-lights. He explained that he worked at an electrical substation in Pasadena and did frequent voltage checks in the area. He stated that he did one before coming to the meeting. He went on to state that he did not agree with the building of large, two - story homes next to single -story homes, that this created a loss of privacy. In conclusion, he stated that the new structures combined with the Kawasaki dealership would create heavier traffic for the area. Vice- Chairman Arrighi inquired as to what time the voltage reading was taken. Planning Commission Minutes September 12, 2000 Page 4 Mr. Garcia stated it was taken at about 7:00. He stated he had gone out to his garage where he had just installed a new washer and dryer and the washing machine motor was smoking. He stated that when he turned on the dryer, that it tripped off automatically indicating that the voltage in the area was too low. Vice - Chairman Arrighi inquired of Mr. Garcia whether he was aware there had been a transformer on fire at Longden and Rosemead Boulevard earlier in the day. Mr. Garcia stated that he noticed some traffic lights were out. He went on to state that this problem with his washer and dryer was not a one -time occurrence, that he had to replace several appliances over the years including TVs, VCRs and microwaves. He stated that several of his neighbors had experienced the same types of problems. Vice - Chairman Arriqhi inquired as to whether Mr. Garcia was aware that there had not even been a Stage I alert today. Mr. Garcia stated if that had been the case, that he should not have had problems with his power. Chairman Zovak inquired as to whether Mr. Garcia had contacted the electrical company regarding his problems. Mr. Garcia stated that he had in the past but not this time. Chairman Zovak inquired as to what the response was from the electrical company. Mr. Garcia stated that their response was a week and a half, which meant that in about a week and a half the voltage would come back up. Commissioner Griffiths inquired as to whether the voltage would stay up or go down. Mr. Garcia stated that it would stay up for awhile but he did not know if that was due to the fact that they had put capacitors on the line, which would keep the voltage up. Chairman Zovak inquired as to whether it was a continuous problem. Mr. Garcia stated that it was not. He stated that it happened off and on. He further stated that it had happened every summer for the last five years. • " Planning Commission Minutes September 12, 2000 Page 5 Mary Burke, 5114 N. Sultana Avenue, stated that she had lived in Temple City for 27 years and_ she was very upset about the fact that single - family homes were being replaced with "Taj Mahal" type homes. She stated that her area was one of the last ones left that had large lots and she was sure that all around her would soon be built condominium projects and large homes. She further stated that these types of developments created much more traffic and this area was already heavily congested, especially in conjunction with the Kawasaki dealership. She concluded by saying that she had made several complaints to Kawasaki and she would be addressing the City Council regarding that matter. Chairman Zovak inquired as to whether Mr. Jong would like to make any additional comments. Hank Jong stated that his only other comment would be to request a continuance so that the various issues could be addressed and the plans could be re- drawn. There being no further public input relative to the matter, Commissioner Seibert moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Commissioner Griffiths, and unanimously carried. Discussion ensued regarding the unusable land around the Eaton Wash and how it should be counted and coming up with suggestions on how to handle similar matters in the future. City Attorney Martin stated that three motions were in order: 1) to honor a request for a continuance to the next regular meeting as requested; 2) to state there is an ambiguity in the Code as to the definition of what is a usable lot vs. the definition of what is a lot; and 3) to instruct the Director to amend the Zoning Code to reflect such new language. Commissioner Seibert moved to approve the three motions as stated by City Attorney Martin, seconded by Commissioner Capra, and unanimously carried. Commissioner Zovak explained to Mr. Jong that his request for a continuance had been approved. He stated that the City was going to review the issue of usable land vs. unusable land and that the easement issue would be looked at. He also stated that they would discount the square footage within the easement and re- calculate and reconfigure the square footage. He further stated that the inconsistencies on the plans would have to be corrected and, finally, that the hearing would be continued to September the 26th. Planning Commission Minutes September 12, 2000 Page 6 B. REQUEST: A NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN CONJUNCTION WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND ZONE VARIANCE TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2,849 SQUARE FOOT FAST -FOOD RESTAURANT (JACK -IN- THE -BOX) WITH A VEHICULAR DRIVE -THRU TO BE SITUATED WITHIN THE VALUMART SHOPPING CENTER WITH A TOTAL OF 188 PARKING SPACES (INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 247 SPACES) Case No.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00- 1426 /ZONE VARIANCE 00 -1431 Site: 6342 ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD Property GVD COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES Owner: 1915 E. KATELLA AVENUE, SUITE A ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92867 Architect: Recommendation: RS HERMAN ARCHITECTS 6009 MELROSE AVENUE LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90038 1) Hear Staff Report 2) Hear those for and against 3) Approve Negative Declaration 4) Adopt Resolution Director Dawson pointed out to the Commission that they had been given two additional documents that had come in subsequent to the assembly of their packets. One was a petition which had been signed by many of the residents in the surrounding area who were opposed to the proposal, and the second was a letter from the applicant's representative asking for a continuance for two weeks to allow them ample time to meet with the residents to go over the proposal and to perhaps make modifications. He inquired of City Attorney Martin as to whether he should go forward with the presentation of the staff report and the Commission should proceed with the public hearing in light of the request for continuance or whether the proceeding should be continued. City Attorney Martin suggested that the Commission consider making a determination that applicants must submit a request for a continuance 72 hours before a scheduled public hearing so that all parties may be notified sufficiently ahead of time. He then advised Chairman Zovak to poll the Commission to determine whether the continuance should be approved and, if approved, " " " Planning Commission Minutes September 12, 2000 Page 7 whether the. hearing, should be_ segmented as far as taking testimony from the residents who were present. Chairman Zovak stated that a continuation to meet with the residents was a valid request and_that he would encourage such a.request. Commissioner Griffiths stated that such a meeting would surely simplify the work of the Commission. He suggested that testimony be taken from the residents who were present_so as to save them the trouble of appearing again. Commissioners Arrighi, Seibert and Capra agreed that a preliminary meeting with the residents would be helpful and that testimony should be taken from the residents who were present. Chairman Zovak stated that the Commission would proceed-with the public hearing in that there were a number of residents who would like to speak regarding the application. Director Dawson summarized the staff report dated September 12, 2000. Chairman Zovak opened the public hearing and invited interested parties to come forward to speak on the matter. Richard Wiez, 6341 N. Sultana Avenue, stated that this project would be just one more to disturb their neighborhood and_that it was unfortunate that businesses such as this were allowed to go in without the consent of the residents. He stated that the residents did not want any other businesses which would create more noise. He stated that they were subjected to round -the- clock noise as it was from truck deliveries, leaf blowers, parking lot sweepers, merry -go- rounds, etc. With the .addition of Jack -in- the -Box, they would now have drive -thru noise to look forward to as well as vagrants, excess trash, teenagers using the parking lot as a hangout, etc. He concluded by saying that the. City was notorious for allowing such businesses to come into neighborhoods but then they did not police them to make sure they were adhering to the conditions of approval which had been put in place and agreed to. Mariano Balbuena, 6317 N. Sultana Avenue, stated that the intersection of Rosemead and Longden was already heavily saturated at the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. and adding another business at that location would make it: next to impossible to get to their residences. He also stated that by allowing another business in that particular area would be taking parking away from the other businesses and they would be Planning Commission Minutes September 12, 2000 Page 8 losing customers because the area would be too crowded and because of the lack of parking. He also expressed concern that the Jack -in- the -Box would be a hangout for teenagers as well as homeless people. He concluded by saying that many more residents would have come to the meeting except for the fact that they did not have enough time to organize; the delay in the mail because of the holiday weekend meant that they received the notice later than normal. Raymond Wong, 6329 Sultana Avenue, stated that he felt the Jack - in -the -Box was the wrong type of business to have at this location. He further stated that he had all of the same concerns of vagrancy, excessive trash, hoodlums, noise and increased traffic congestion. He concluded by saying that there were two other Jack -in -the -Box locations close by and he did not see the need to have another one so close in proximity. Arlo Van Houten, 9076 Woolley Street, stated that he had been a resident in Temple City for 40 years. He stated that he agreed with everything the other residents had said concerning the problems with traffic, trash and lack of parking at the other businesses. He concluded by saying the neighborhood did not need this Jack -in -the -Box in the area; it would exacerbate all the problems they were already facing. Commissioner Seibert moved to continue the public hearing, seconded by Vice - Chairman Arrighi, and unanimously carried. Chairman Zovak explained that the matter had been continued to the next regularly- scheduled meeting, which would be September 26th. He inquired of Director Dawson whether the residents would be re- noticed for the new hearing. Director Dawson stated that they would be re- noticed and reiterated that the hearing would be continued to September 26, 2000. Chairman Zovak asked that Director Dawson get clarification from the Traffic Engineer regarding Table IV of the Traffic Analysis Report. Director Dawson stated he would provide copies of the Traffic Analysis to the residents, including the Appendix. 8. COMMUNICATIONS: Prior to the public hearing, the Chairman and City Manager /City Attorney took action to approve the first Fast -Track application 40 for a recycling container at Ralphs Grocery Store. Director Planning Commission Minutes • September 12, 2000 Page 9 • Dawson stated that the decision would be final unless someone asked for a hearing before the full Commission. He explained that notices were sent out prior to the Fast -Track Committee convening and notices would be sent out again notifying the surrounding businesses and residents of the approval. 9. MATTERS FROM CITY OFFICIALS: Director Dawson stated that the Attorney General had sent a letter advising that it was a good idea for the City to re -visit their General Plan. He explained that the review would be undertaken at the staff level and staff would be coming to the Commission with a list of amendments and that would occur on September 26, 2000. Commissioner Griffiths expressed concern regarding the validity of the Traffic Analysis Report. City Attorney Martin raised the question of the deficiency of electrical service in the Sereno Drive location and whether deficient utility service should be a factor that the Commission should consider when deciding to grant approval to a project. Vice - Chairman Arrighi stated that it would be up to the contractors on the project to make sure that there was ample electricity, water and gas for the surrounding neighborhood. He further stated that it could be the resident's service to his home that was faulty. Commissioner Seibert pointed out the fact that during the summer months it is common to have electrical shortages. Further discussion ensued regarding the issue of deficient utility services and new construction projects. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chairman Zovak adjourned the meeting at 8:30 p.m. The next regularly - scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission is Tuesday, September 26, 2000 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 5938 Kauffman Avenue, Temple City. Chairm " PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 12, 2000 INITIATION: 1. CALL TO ORDER Pursuant to the Agenda posted September 8, 2000, Chairman Zovak called the meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, September 12, 2000. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 3. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners - Griffiths, Seibert, Capra, Arrighi, Zovak Also Present: City Manager Martin, Community Development Director Dawson and Associate Planner Williams 4. TIME FOR THOSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISH TO SPEAK: None " 5. CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner Seibert moved to approve the Consent. Calendar, as submitted, seconded by Commissioner Griffiths, and unanimously carried. A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Meeting of August 22, 2000 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None 7. NEW BUSINESS A. PUBLIC HEARING: A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECT WITH FOUR (4) DETACHED UNITS FOR THE. PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5226 -5230 SERENO DRIVE Case No.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00- 1428 /TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25963 Site: 5226 -5230 SERENO DRIVE Property Owner: WENDING PEI TRITECH DEVELOPMENT, INC. 735 WEST EMERSON AVENUE, #202 MONTEREY PARK, CA 91754 Planning Commission Minutes September 12, 2000 Page 2 Applicant/ Architect: Engineer: Recommendation: DAPHNE FAN 13501 TRACY STREET, #B BALDWIN PARK, CALIFORNIA 91706 HANK JONG EGL ASSOCIATES, INC. 11823 SLAUSON AVENUE, #1802 SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 1) Hear Staff Report 2) Hear those for and against 3) This project is Categorically Exempt 4) Adopt Resolution Director Dawson summarized the staff report dated September 12, 2000. Associate Planner Williams narrated the videotape of the subject property. Commissioner Seibert inquired as to whether the easement for the flood control was usable by the property owners. Director Dawson stated that there was 16 feet that had been surrendered to the property owners but that the other 84 feet was not usable. Commissioner Seibert inquired as to why the 84 feet was included in the calculations for the plans. Director Dawson stated that it was included as part of the lot. He went on to explain that there was nothing in the Zoning regulations that specified that it must be usable. Commissioner Seibert inquired as to whether there was anything in the Code that required that it must not be used. Director Dawson stated there was nothing in the Code that went either way. He suggested that the Commission may want to consider making calculations on the usable area and not give credit for the Eaton Wash. Commissioner Seibert inquired as to what the floor area ratio would be if the wash were not included in the calculation. Commissioner Griffiths stated that by disallowing the use of that northerly 84 feet, the F.A. R. would be 58 instead of 43. • • • " Planning Commission Minutes September 12, 2000 Page 3 Chairman Zovak clarified that they would be in excess. Director Dawson concurred with Chairman Zovak. Commissioner Griffiths raised additional issues concerning the easement, and discussion was ensued by the Commission regarding such. Chairman Zovak opened the public hearing and invited interested parties to come forward to speak on the matter. Hank Jonq, Tritech Development, 11823 Slauson Avenue, #18, Santa Fe Springs, stated that he would be willing to go back and re- calculate the square footage of the project, otherwise the conditions of approval were acceptable. Director Dawson inquired of Mr. Jong whether he would be agreeable to a continuance so the Commission could come back and review a finished product. Mr. Jong stated that he would be agreeable to a continuance. Commissioner Griffiths suggested that perhaps Mr. Jong work more closely with the architect to eliminate further miscalculations and inconsistencies. Mr. Jonq explained that it was not that they had not worked closely together, but that the architect did everything by hand whereas his office utilized CAD. Director Dawson pointed out that only one unit was indicated on the tentative map. Mr. Jonq stated that he would correct that. Efrain Garcia, 5129 Sultana Avenue, stated that the power demand for this particular area was already excessive and there were recurring problems with circuit breakers and flickering lights. He explained that he worked at an electrical substation in Pasadena and did frequent voltage checks in the area. He stated that he did one before coming to the meeting. He went on to state that he did not agree with the building of large, two - story homes next to single -story homes, that this created a loss of privacy. In conclusion, he stated that the new structures combined with the Kawasaki dealership would create heavier traffic for the area. " Vice - Chairman Arrighi inquired as to what time the- voltage reading was taken. Planning Commission Minutes September 12, 2000 Page 4 Mr. Garcia stated it was taken at about 7:00. He stated he had gone out to his garage where he had just installed a new washer and dryer and the washing machine motor was smoking. He stated that when he turned on the dryer, that it tripped off automatically indicating that the voltage in the area was too low. Vice - Chairman Arrighi inquired of Mr. Garcia whether he was aware there had been a transformer on fire at Longden and Rosemead Boulevard earlier in the day. Mr. Garcia stated that he noticed some traffic lights were out. He went on to state that this problem with his washer and dryer was not a one -time occurrence, that he had to replace several appliances over the years including TVs, VCRs and microwaves. He stated that several of his neighbors had experienced the same types of problems. Vice - Chairman Arrighi inquired as to whether Mr. Garcia was aware that there had not even been a Stage I alert today. Mr. Garcia stated if that had been the case, that he should not have had problems with his power. Chairman Zovak inquired as to whether Mr. Garcia had contacted the electrical company regarding his problems. Mr. Garcia stated that he had in the past but not this time. Chairman Zovak inquired as to what the response was from the electrical company. Mr. Garcia stated that their response was a week and a half, which meant that in about a week and a half 'the voltage would come back up. Commissioner Griffiths inquired as to whether the voltage would stay up or go down. Mr. Garcia stated that it would stay up for awhile but he did not know if that was due to the fact that they had put capacitors on the line, which would keep the voltage up. Chairman Zovak inquired as to whether it was a continuous problem. Mr. Garcia stated that it was not. He stated that it happened off and on. He further stated that it had happened every summer for the last five years. • " " " Planning Commission Minutes September 12, 2000 Page 5 Mary Burke, 5114 N. Sultana Avenue, stated that she had lived in Temple City. for 27 years and she was very upset about the fact that single - family homes were being replaced with "Taj Mahal" type homes. She stated that her area was one of the last ones left that had large lots and she was sure that all around her would soon be built condominium projects and large homes. She further stated that these types of developments created much more traffic and this area was already heavily congested, especially in conjunction with the Kawasaki dealership. She concluded by saying that she had made several complaints to Kawasaki and she would be addressing the City Council regarding that matter. Chairman Zovak inquired as to whether Mr. Jong would like to make any additional comments. Hank Jong stated that his only other comment would be to request a continuance so that the various issues could be addressed and the plans could be re- drawn. There being no further public input relative to the matter, Commissioner Seibert moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Commissioner Griffiths, and unanimously carried. Discussion ensued regarding the unusable land around the Eaton Wash and how it should be counted and coming up with suggestions on how to handle similar matters in the future. City Attorney Martin stated that three motions were in order: 1) to honor a request for a continuance to the next regular meeting as requested; 2) to state there is an ambiguity in the Code as to the definition of what is a usable lot vs. the definition of what is a lot; and 3) to instruct the Director to amend the Zoning Code to reflect such new language. Commissioner Seibert moved to approve the three motions as stated by City Attorney Martin, seconded by Commissioner Capra, and unanimously carried. Commissioner Zovak explained to Mr. Jong that his request for a continuance had been approved. He stated that the City was going to review the issue of usable land vs. unusable land and that the easement issue would be looked at. He also stated that they would discount the square footage within the easement and re- calculate and reconfigure the square footage. He further stated that the inconsistencies on the plans would have to be corrected and, finally, that the hearing would be continued to September the 26th. Planning Commission Minutes September 12, 2000 Page 6 B. REQUEST: A NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN CONJUNCTION WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND ZONE VARIANCE TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2,849 SQUARE FOOT FAST -FOOD RESTAURANT (JACK -IN- THE -BOX) WITH A VEHICULAR DRIVE -THRU TO BE SITUATED WITHIN THE VALUMART SHOPPING CENTER WITH A TOTAL OF 188 PARKING SPACES (INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 247 SPACES) Case No.: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00- 1426 /ZONE VARIANCE 00 -1431 Site: 6342 ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD Property GVD COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES Owner: 1915 E. KATELLA AVENUE, SUITE A ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92867 Architect: Recommendation: RS HERMAN ARCHITECTS 6009 MELROSE AVENUE LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90038 1) Hear Staff Report 2) Hear those for and against 3) Approve Negative Declaration 4) Adopt Resolution Director Dawson pointed out to the Commission that they had been given two additional documents that had come in subsequent to the assembly of their packets. One was a petition which had been signed by many of the residents in the surrounding area who were opposed to the proposal, and the second was a letter from the applicant's representative asking for a continuance for two weeks to allow them ample time to meet with the residents to go over the proposal and to perhaps make modifications. He inquired of City Attorney Martin as to whether he should go forward with the presentation of the staff report- and the Commission should proceed with the public hearing in light of the request for continuance or whether the proceeding should be continued. City Attorney Martin suggested that the Commission consider making a determination that applicants must submit a request for a continuance 72 hours before a scheduled public hearing so that all parties may be notified sufficiently ahead of time. He then advised Chairman Zovak to poll the Commission to determine whether the continuance should be approved and, if approved, • • " " Planning Commission Minutes September 12, 2000 Page 7 whether the hearing should be_ segmented as far as, taking testimony from the residents who were present. Chairman Zovak stated that a continuation to meet- with the residents was a valid request and that he would encourage such a request. Commissioner Griffiths stated that such a meeting would surely simplify the work of the Commission. He suggested that testimony be taken from the residents who were present so as to save them the trouble of appearing again. Commissioners Arrighi, Seibert and Capra agreed that a preliminary meeting with the residents would be helpful and that testimony should be taken from the residents who were present. Chairman Zovak stated that the Commission would proceed with the public hearing in that there were a number of residents who would like to speak regarding the application. Director Dawson summarized the staff report dated September 12, 2000. Chairman Zovak opened the public hearing and invited interested parties to come forward to speak on the matter. Richard Wiez, 6341 N. Sultana Avenue, stated that this project would be just one more to disturb their neighborhood and that it was unfortunate that businesses such as this were allowed to go in without the consent of the residents. He stated that the residents did not want any other businesses which would create more noise. He stated that they were subjected to round -the- clock noise as it was from truck deliveries, leaf blowers, parking lot sweepers, merry -go- rounds, etc. With the addition of Jack -in- the -Box, they would now have drive -thru noise to look forward to as well as vagrants, excess trash, teenagers using the parking lot as a hangout, etc. He concluded by saying that the City was notorious for allowing such businesses to come into neighborhoods but then they did not police-them to make sure they were adhering to the conditions of approval which had been put in place and agreed to. Mariano Balbuena, 6317 N. Sultana Avenue, stated that the intersection of Rosemead and Longden was already heavily saturated at the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. and adding another business at that location would make it next to impossible to get to their residences. He also stated that by allowing another business in that particular area would be taking parking away from the other businesses and they would be Planning Commission Minutes September 12, 2000 Page 8 losing customers because the area would be too crowded and because of the lack of parking. He also expressed concern that the Jack -in- the -Box would be a hangout for teenagers as well as homeless people. He concluded by saying that many more residents would have come to the meeting except for the fact that they did not have enough time to organize; the delay in the mail because of the holiday weekend meant that they received the notice later than normal. Raymond Wong, 6329 Sultana Avenue, stated that he felt the Jack - in- the -Box was the wrong type of business to have at this location. He further stated that he had all of the same concerns of vagrancy, excessive trash, hoodlums, noise and increased traffic congestion. He concluded by saying that there were two other Jack -in- the -Box locations close by and he did not see the need to have another one so close in proximity. Arlo Van Houten, 9076 Woolley Street, stated that he had been a resident in Temple City for 40 years. He stated that he agreed with everything the other residents had said concerning the problems with traffic, trash and lack of parking at the other businesses. He concluded by saying the neighborhood did not need this Jack -in- the -Box in the area; it would exacerbate all the problems they were already facing. Commissioner Seibert moved to continue the public hearing, seconded by Vice - Chairman Arrighi, and unanimously. carried. Chairman Zovak explained that the matter had been continued to the next regularly- scheduled meeting, which would be September 26th. He inquired of Director Dawson whether the residents would be re- noticed for the new hearing. Director Dawson stated that they would be re- noticed and reiterated that the hearing would be continued to September 26, 2000. Chairman Zovak asked that Director Dawson get clarification from the Traffic Engineer regarding Table IV of the Traffic Analysis Report. Director Dawson stated he would provide copies of the Traffic Analysis to the residents, including the Appendix. 8. COMMUNICATIONS: • Prior to the public hearing, the Chairman and City Manager /City Attorney took action to approve the first Fast -Track application ill for a recycling container at Ralphs Grocery Store. Director Planning Commission Minutes • September 12, 2000 Page 9 • Dawson stated that the decision would be final unless someone asked for a hearing before the full Commission. He explained that notices were sent out prior to the Fast -Track Committee convening and notices would be sent out again notifying the surrounding businesses and residents of the approval. 9. MATTERS FROM CITY OFFICIALS: Director Dawson stated that the Attorney General had sent a letter advising that it was a good idea for the City to re -visit their General Plan. He explained that the review would be undertaken at the staff level and staff would be coming to the Commission with a list of amendments and that would occur on September 26, 2000. Commissioner Griffiths expressed concern regarding the validity of the Traffic Analysis Report. City Attorney Martin raised the question of the deficiency of electrical service in the Sereno Drive location and whether deficient utility service should be a factor that the Commission should consider when deciding to grant approval to a project. Vice - Chairman Arrighi stated that it would be up to the contractors on the project to make sure that there was ample electricity, water and gas for the surrounding neighborhood. He further stated that it could be the resident's service to his home that was faulty. Commissioner Seibert pointed out the fact that during the summer months it is common to have electrical shortages. Further discussion ensued regarding the issue of deficient utility services and new construction projects. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chairman Zovak adjourned the meeting at 8:30 p.m. The next regularly - scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission is Tuesday, September 26, 2000 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 5938 Kauffman Avenue, Temple City. Q.eki Chairma BEE /MINS/24442.1