HomeMy Public PortalAbout2002-220
RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - 22
A RESOLUTION AFFIRMING
LEAR OPERATIONS CORPORATION
OF COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENTS OF BENEFITS
WHEREAS, Lear Operations Corporation (dba Lear -. Greencastle) has heretofore been
granted certain tax abatements in consideration of certain benefits for the City of Greencastle; and,
WHEREAS, said company has submitted a from CF -1 as of May 1, 2002 for tax abatement
granted in 1998; and
WHEREAS, the Greencastle Common Council has reviewed the CF -1 form, a copy of which
is attached hereto, and has found compliance with the Statements of Benefits as approved by the
Greencastle Common Council,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Common Council of the City of
Greencastle, Putnam County, Indiana, approves the CF -1 form as submitted as being in compliance
with the Statements of Benefits previously filed by Lear Operations Corporation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution of the Greencastle Common Council be
0
made a record and filed along with the CF -1 form with the Putnam County Auditor.
PASSED by the Common Council of the City of Greencastle at its regular meeting this 14th
day of May, 2002.
-
COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENCASTLE, INDIANA
Mark N. Hammer oe M. Let c ty
C � GL�u_z
Thomas W. Roach
RobAt Sedlack
M e Rokicki
Approved and signed by me this 14th day of May,
I.1
Pamela S. Jones,
2002 at �$ o'clock.
tc: )
Nancy A. Mi¢ ael, Mayor
C. UU4
COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENT OF BENEFITS FORM
Stale FOrtn 44973 (R4 / 12 -o1) CF -1
fy s rl ed by the Department of Loral Gavamment Finance
INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Property owners whose Statement of Benefits was approved after June 30, 1991 must file this form with the County Auditor and the
local Designating Body to show the extent to which them has been compliance with the Statement of Benefits. (This does not apply
to property located Ina residentially distressed area).
2. If the deduction applies to Real Estate and Improvements, then this form must be riled with the initial deduction application and then
ty
annually within six (60 dayys Offer the and o! each yaarin which the deduction Is applicable.
3. For New Manufacturing �qulpment or New Research and Development Equiii this form must be filed with Form 322 ERAIPP, ME,
or Rand DE respectively between March 1 and May ib of each year, unless a filing extension under IC 6- 1.1 -3.7 has been granted. A
person who obtains a filing extension must file between March 1 and the extended duo date of each year.
4. With the approval ofthe designating body, compliance information for multiple projects may be consolidated on one (1) compliance
I Nam of taxpayer
L-pAIZ OpejtAJ -rOrJ ORpORra`hor.� A L,.Q.A2- l7t�eQ,r.3C4S(ICx
Address of taxpayer (street and number, city, &ate and ZIP rode) n
O 91 56b N. Fd1mo l� eenlCgzl�
:Na o contact person Telephone number
o L 'AN 1 os (7ls) OL1
�Na of designat Resolution number ) j
¢ ing hody ore mo1.i co wX r l 199 - 3 s�f (D
C
' Location of property County Txin district
50o N. ,1�,mo a. ?4 +ii fl o� (;
Description of real property improvements and /or new manufacturing equipment, or new research and development Esbrn d starting date
equipmenLto beacqulred / I —1-
Estimated completion date
Current number of employees
Salaries
Number of employees retained
Salaries
Number of additional employee
Salaries
I NOTE: The COST of the property is confidential pursuant to IC 6-1.1- 12.1 -5.5 (d). "
Assessed Value L`O,l§k
Assessed Value
'� Gus#,' ° %:
Assessed Value j
Values before project
419 4/ 4A;L7
Plus: Values of proposed project
Less: Values of any property being replaced
Net values upon completion of project
O/
x3,py!
Assessed Value gL`4sZ fi
Assessed Value
'GOfT ° ^^ s
Assessed Value
Values before project
_
9
Plus: Values of proposed project
Less: Values of any property being replaced
Net values upon completion of project
QQ YS
I NOTE: The COST of the property is confidential pursuant to IC 6-1.1- 12.1 -5.5 (d). "
MA RCOR
J
INSTRUCTIONS: (IC ri -1.1- 12.1 -5.9)
1. Within forty -five (45) days aherreceipt of this form. the designating body may determine whether or not the property owner has substantially complied vdih
the Statement of Benefits.
2. If the pmpany owner is found MOTO be In substantial compliance, the designating body shoo send the property owner wrrhon notico. The notice must Include
the masons for the determination and the date, time and place ofa hearing to be conducted by the designating body, if a notice is mailed to a pmporty owner
for new manufacturing equipment and I or research and dovelopmant equipment, a copy of the wrlhen notice shell be sent to the Stato Board of Tax
Commissioners.
3. Based on the Information presented at the hearing, the designating body shall determine whether or not the property owner has made reasonable effort to
substantially comply with the Statement of Benefits.
4. If the designating body determines that the property owner has MOTmado reasonable effort to comply, then the designating body shall adopt a resolution
terminating the deduction. The designating body shall Immediately mail a certified copy of the resolution to: (1) the property owner, (2) the County Auditor
and (3) the State Board of Tax Commissioners.
We have reviewed the CF -1 and find that:
❑ the property owner IS In substantial compliance
ro w
❑ the property owner IS NOT in substantial compliance
❑ other (specify)
I
I
Reasons for the determination (attach additional sheets if necessary)
I
I
I
I
I Signature of authorized member
Date signed (month, day, year)
I
Attested by:
Designating body
I
If the property owner is found not to be in substantial compliance, the property owner shall receive the
opportunity for a hearing. The
following dale and time has been set aside for the purpose of considering compliance.
Time of hearing
Dale of hearing
Location o( hearing
',
El AM ❑ PM
HEARING RESULTS (to be completed after the hearing)
❑ Appro ❑ D (see instruction 4 above) I
Reasons for the determination (attach additional sheets If necessary)
I
I
I
I
I I
i
I
!Signature of authorized member Date signed (month, day, year)
I I
Attested by: Designating body
APPEAL RIGHTS fIC 6 -1.1- 12.1- 5.9tc)]
A property owner whose deduction is denied by the designating body may appeal the designating body's decision by filing a complaint
in the office of the Circuit or Superior Court together with a bond conditioned to pay the costs of the appeal if the appeal is determined
against the property owner.