HomeMy Public PortalAbout2001-05-15 Regular Meeting153
COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING — MAY 15. 2001
The Regular Meeting of the Bal Harbour Village Council was held on Tuesday, May 15,
2001, in the Council Chambers, at Bal Harbour Village Hall. The meeting was called to
order at 3:05 p.m. by Mayor Berlin. Those present were:
Mayor Howard J. Berlin
Assistant Mayor Daniel Tantleff
Councilman Peg E. Gorson
Councilman Seymour Roth
Also present: Alfred J. Treppeda, Village Manager
Jeanette Horton, Village Clerk
Richard J. Weiss, Village Attorney
Absent: Councilman James E. Boggess
As a quorum was determined to be present, the meeting commenced.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: A motion was offered by Councilman Roth and
seconded by Assistant Mayor Tantleff to approve the minutes of the April 16, 2001, Council
Induction Meeting, April 17, 2001, Regular Council Meeting, and May 7, 2001, Council Workshop
Meeting. The motion carried unanimously (4-0), with Councilman Boggess absent, and the minutes
were all approved as submitted.
i. PRESENTATIONS:
OFFICER OF THE MONTH — OFFICER PAUL EPPLER: Chief
Larry Freeman announced that Officer Paul Eppler was selected as the Officer of the Month,
for April 2001, for his exemplary work of the enforcement of traffic and parking law violations,
as well as Village ordinances. Chief Freeman explained that Officer Eppler also rescued a
resident (6 years old), who accidentally rode his bicycle into the Yacht Basin in the Security
District. Chief Freeman presented Officer Eppler with the Officer of the Month plaque. On
behalf of the Village, Mayor Berlin presented Officer Eppler with a check.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None
S. ORDINANCES SECOND READING/PUBLIC HEARINGS: None
6. ORDINANCES FIRST READING:
An Ordinance was read, by title, by the Village Clerk, amending Chapter 9 of the Village Code
by amending section 9-34 pertaining to occupational license tax schedule.
Mayor Berlin stated that if these are in fact storage spaces and no business of any kind is
taking place there, and they are no greater than and no less than what one would rent if they
went into a public storage facility (closet), then he has no problem with them not being
Regular Council Meeting 05/15/2001 1
154
required to submit for an occupational license for that space, with two caveats. First, he
would ask that the Village Attorney provide a definition of the term "storage space" so that it's
understood that if there's a desk, phone, any kind of communications device, employees,
staff, mail is received there, etc. or anything other than a closet, then it's not a storage space
and an occupational license would have to be obtained for business purposes. He explained
that secondly, the shop owners have to be reminded that the inventory that they store there is
part of their occupational license tax and they are required to account for it. Councilman Roth
agreed and clarified that it was made clear that there are some businesses that have a desk
or telephone there, so an occupational license is being collected from them for that. He
advised that it was made clear that if the storage is inventory only, then it has to be included
in the store's total inventory.
Mr. Weiss suggested making a motion to amend the ordinance to add a definition of storage
space, then the specific wording will be brought to the Council on second reading. Assistant
Mayor Tantleff questioned if someone from the Village will be checking on the storage spaces
to make sure they have an occupational license, if one is needed. Mrs. Horton advised that
the Code Enforcement Officer will periodically check on that.
A motion was offered by Councilman Roth and seconded by Assistant Mayor Tantleff to approve this
ordinance with the amendment to define "storage space." The motion carried with the vote as
follows: Mayor Berlin aye; Assistant Mayor Tantleff aye; Councilman Boggess absent; Councilman
Gorson aye; Councilman Roth ave. Thus becoming:
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF BAL HARBOUR VILLAGE, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE
VILLAGE CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 9 "LICENSES AND BUSINESS
REGULATIONS," AT ARTICLE II "OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE," BY AMENDING
SECTION 9-34 "LICENSE TAX SCHEDULE," AT PARAGRAPH (A) "RETAIL SALES
AND LEASE -GOODS," BY CREATING PARAGRAPH (3) "NO ADDITIONAL
LICENSE REQUIRED FOR STORAGE ACCESSORY TO SELLING OF
MERCHANDISE," PROVIDING THAT A SECOND OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE IS
NOT REQUIRED WHERE A MERCHANT MAINTAINS, AT A SEPARATE
LOCATION WITHIN THE SAME BUILDING AS THE LICENSED PRIMARY
BUSINESS PREMISES, A STORAGE SPACE UTILIZED SOLELY AS AN
ACCESSORY TO THE PRIMARY MERCHANT USE; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN CODE; PROVIDING FOR
EFFECTIVE DATE.
An Ordinance was read, by title, by the Village Clerk, amending Chapter 5 of the Village Code
by creating Section 5-7 "Control of Dogs."
A motion was offered by Assistant Mayor Tantleff and seconded by Councilman Roth for discussion
purposes. Mr. Weiss explained that a couple of years ago, the Florida Legislature changed
Section 827.27, which deals with local animal control and cruelty ordinances. He stated that
years ago, the things the Council is talking about, had criminal penalties imposed; however,
the Legislature has limited the Village's ability to criminalize these types of acts and has also
limited the ability to charge penalties and fines. So, the Legislature states that these are civil
infractions, so nobody can be put in jail for a violation of this ordinance. Also, normally the
Village can charge whatever fine it wants as imposed by ordinance, but in this particular case,
the Legislature has limited the Village's ability to charge fines, to a maximum of $500. In
addition, it is required that the Ordinance the Village enacts have a provision in it that says if
Regular Council Meeting 05/15/2001 2
155
someone does not contest the citation, then the fine must be less. If it is contested, then
there's a mandatory court appearance. If the person doesn't show up, then they're in
contempt of court. Also, the Village would then have the ability to charge a higher fine over
the non -contested fine. Mr. Weiss stated that there's also Chapter 5 of the Dade County
Code, which is very extensive and deals with all sorts of licensing, including the ability to have
a dog designated as a dangerous dog. There are also procedures, penalties, impoundment,
etc. and all of the provisions of the County ordinance have been incorporated into the
Village's ordinance, so it can be enforced as deemed appropriate.
Mayor Berlin reviewed the ordinance by section for comments by the public.
Mr. Weiss reviewed Section 5-7 (b)(4) No Responsible Party shall allow a Dog to remain in the Front
Yard of the premises of the Responsible Party unless secured by a leash or restrained by a wall so that the
Dog may not reach the sidewalk adjacent to the premises or leave the premises to run At Large. The wall
utilized may consist of a wall or other enclosure authorized by the zoning code or of an authorized and
permitted low voltage electric barrier. If an electric barrier is used it shall not be located any further from
the front of the house than five (5') feet and no closer than five (5') feet to any sidewalk or public or private
street." Mr. Weiss explained that the electronic barriers work by burying a trench in the lawn
and then a wire is buried. If the dog comes within a certain distance of that wire, then it gives
them a shock. He explained that if the owner buried the wire at the property line, then the dog
can go up to the property line and scare people that are walking down the street. So, this
would give a significant distance between the trench and the street, so that people walking by
wouldn't be frightened by the dog. Joni Blachar, resident — 63 Camden Court, questioned
if electric barriers have to be allowed at all. Mayor Berlin recommended eliminating electrical
barriers. He feels that electronic leashes and barriers are only as good as the machinery and,
if the electricity is off, then there is no barrier. His inclination would be to eliminate all forms of
electrical barriers. A motion was offered by Mayor Berlin and seconded by Assistant Mayor
Tantleff to eliminate electrical barriers from the ordinance.
Mrs. Blachar reviewed Section 5-7(b)(3) "No Responsible party shall possess a Dog unless such Dog
shall wear a substantial, durable collar or harness at all times, to which a valid Miami -Dade County license
tag shall be securely attached." Mrs. Blachar questioned if dogs are required to be registered with
the Village. Mr. Weiss responded that the Village doesn't currently register dogs. Phil
Corbisiero, resident — 63 Bal Bay Drive, addressed the Council and questioned if it's
possible to have the dogs registered with the Civic Association. Mr. Weiss stated that the
Civic Association could do that, but its not something that the Village would do by ordinance,
because the Association is a private entity separate from the Village. Mr. Weiss stated that
he wouldn't want to give an opinion on what the Civic Association can or cannot do, but thinks
that it sounds like something they could probably do. Mr. Corbisiero questioned if the Civic
Association institutes that policy, if it could be legal to make a mandatory workshop for
licensed dogs in Bal Harbour. Mr. Weiss suggested that Mr. Corbisiero speak to the Civic
Association's Attorney.
Assistant Mayor Tantleff reviewed Section 5-7(c) "Limitation on Number Dogs" and doesn't
see how the number of dogs can be limited. He thinks that the ordinance is to make sure that
the dog is leashed, quiet, and so people won't get bitten, but feels that its arbitrary to limit the
amount. Councilman Roth and Mayor Berlin disagreed. Mayor Berlin feels that it should be
limited to two (2) dogs, not three (3). Councilman Roth agreed. Mayor Berlin stated that after
a certain number it becomes a kennel, which the Village is trying to prohibit. Mayor Berlin
commented on the definition of "person" and is concerned that if it is said that "no person
shall keep more than 3 dogs," then, theoretically, if there's a family of 4, then each member
Regular Council Meeting 05/15/2001 3
156
could have 3 dogs each, etc. Mayor Berlin wants to make sure that it's clarified that a single
family residence cannot have more than x number of dogs. Mayor Berlin stated that the idea
is to control the situation. Mr. Corbisiero agreed with the Mayor and thinks that a limit of 2
dogs per residence is more than enough. Mr. Corbisiero stated that on the electrical fences,
the problem with the property line is that if the dog charges off it and winds up in the street,
then they will never come back in because they will get the same electrical shock. Mrs.
Blachar feels that it should be limited to two dogs. She questioned if "No residence shall
keep more than 2 dogs or more than four (4) puppies" means and 4 puppies or 4 puppies.
Mr. Weiss clarified that it's conjunctive and means that the residence can have 3 dogs and4
puppies. Mr. Weiss stated that the Council can do whatever it wants with that. Mrs. Blachar
feels that it should be one or the other, but not both. She stated that if there are puppies,
then the puppies can be kept until they are weaned. Mrs. Blachar's concern was that she
thinks a particular neighbor was breeding puppies. Mayor Berlin stated that there's a
definition of puppies and a puppy can be kept until it's 4 months old, then it's no longer a
puppy and has to be considered a dog. Joan Jacomo, resident — 97 Camden Drive,
addressed the Council and feels that the amount of dogs needs to be limited to two. She also
thinks that the dogs should have tags that have the dog's name, the owners name and the
owners telephone number. A motion was offered by Councilman Roth and seconded by Mayor
Berlin to modify subsection (c) to limit the number to two (2) dogs and four (4) puppies.
Mayor Berlin stated that the Village has an interest in solving a problem, but doesn't want to
be punitive. He questioned what should be done, in terms of enactment, if there are people
who already have 3 dogs. Mr. Weiss stated that under the way the ordinance is written, they
would have to get rid of one. Assistant Mayor Tantleff stated they could be grandfathered in.
Mr. Weiss stated that the Village could provide a registration procedure. Mayor Berlin stated
that it's a two edged sword because if they're grandfathered in, then the Village isn't solving
some of the problems. If they aren't grandfathered in, then it could be punitive. Mr. Weiss
stated that if someone has more than two dogs, then within a certain amount of time (6
months, 1 year, etc.) they would need to find another home for the dog. Assistant Mayor
Tantleff questioned how many homes have more than two dogs. Mayor Berlin stated that his
inclination is that there be no grandfather provision because the Village is trying to solve a
problem to protect people. A motion was offered by Assistant Mayor Tantleff and seconded by
Mayor Berlin to change the word "person" to "household or residence" in subsection (c).
Mr. Weiss explained Section 5-7(f) "Restrictions on Dogs of Certain Size" and stated that
certain sizes of dogs frighten anybody, so the attorneys arbitrarily came up with 50 pounds,
because that's a big dog. If they weigh more than that, they either have to be indoors, on a
leash, or confined to the rear yard. Assistant Mayor Tantleff disagreed about not allowing the
dog to be in the front yard. Mayor Berlin stated that this came to the Council as a significant
problem and he also knows that the Civic Association has been trying to deal with this
problem. He suggested that in order to make this a meaningful ordinance, it needs to be
tough. He advised that if it's not tough, then it doesn't serve its purpose. Mayor Berlin
recommended that, particularly on first reading, the Council approve the toughest form that
it's comfortable with. Mayor Berlin requested that it be given extensive notice so all of the
Village residents know about it. Then, on second reading, the residents can tell the Council if
they're going too far. If nobody thinks that the Council is going too far, then it will be passed
on second reading. Mayor Berlin stated that the Council is trying to protect lives because
people came to the Council and told stories about how they were bitten. Mr. Corbisiero
addressed the height of the wall enclosure being 4 feet. He feels that it should be 6 feet,
because 4 feet isn't that high and a dog could jump over that. Mr. Weiss stated that one of
the concerns with creating very high walls is that there's an aesthetic issue. They also didn't
Regular Council Meeting 05/15/2001 4
157
want to create a conflict with the zoning code. Mr. Corbisiero suggested that if it has to be 4
feet, then the fence should also be secured by a chain. Mayor Berlin requested that Mr.
Corbisiero sees that the Civic Association Board accepts this ordinance at their next meeting,
so somebody can come to the next Council meeting and report the position of the Board. Mr.
Corbisiero agreed.
Mr. Weiss reviewed subsection Section 5-7(g) Dangerous Dogs and explained that this
incorporates the Dangerous Dogs section of the Dade County Code, so that the Village's
Code Enforcement Officers are able to enforce it. He advised that it provides for dealing with
problems, procedure, confiscation, and disposal of dangerous dogs.
Mr. Weiss reviewed Section 5-7(h) Penalty; Enforcement and explained that they made a
sliding scale and it's up to the Council's judgment if they should be higher or lower. He
advised that if someone has 2 dogs running around the Village, then that would be 2
violations. If somebody had a dog running around for 2 days, then that would be 2 violations.
Mayor Berlin commented on the amount paid if it's not contested and suggested that rather
than having it be $100 across the board, that it be 50% of the applicable fine, or $100,
whichever is greater. So, if they're up to $500, they shouldn't be able to get off with a $100
fine, it should be at least $250. A motion was offered by Assistant Mayor Tantleff and seconded
by Mayor Berlin for the tine to be 50% of the applicable fine, or $100, whichever is greater, for
people that don't contest the fine. Councilman Roth stated that this is going to be stringent for
some residents and doesn't feel that it has to be put in the enforcement act, but thinks there
should be a short period with warnings (a couple of weeks). Councilman Roth is for strict
enforcement, but would like a warning period. Mr. Weiss stated that the Village Manager can
be instructed to send copies of the ordinance to every person in the residential district stating
that it will be strictly enforced, will take effect 2 weeks after its adoption, and there will not be
any warnings. Councilman Roth agreed.
Mayor Berlin reviewed Section 5-7(h)(2)(c) and discussed the designation of an animal control
officer. Mr. Weiss explained that an animal control officer can be anybody in the Village and
there's no definition. So, theoretically, police officers and code enforcement officers could be
designated. Or, the Village could contract with someone, part time or full time, or with a
company, to come in and do this. Mayor Berlin suggested that all of the members of the
police department and the code enforcement officer enforce this. The Village should also
consider a part time animal control officer that can come to the Village at different times of the
day to enforce this. Mayor Berlin thinks that if someone is focused on this, then it will
probably clear itself up quickly and there won't be a problem. A motion was offered by Mayor
Berlin and seconded by Assistant Mayor Tantleff to consider hiring a part time Animal Control
Officer. Mr. Weiss stated that it's already covered in the ordinance to provide for an animal
control officer, so on second reading, the Council would instruct the Village Manager to hire
someone to work 20 hours a week to do this. Mayor Berlin requested that Mr. Treppeda
make a note of that.
Larry Freeman, Chief of Police, addressed the Council and questioned, under Section
5.7(h)(2)(d), if the Village wants to go to County court. Mr. Weiss advised that State law
requires that's where it has to go. Chief Freeman addressed Section 5.7(h)(2)(f) and advised
that the Village needs the form of the citation to be used, in order to have time for it to be
printed and issued to officers, before the ordinance can be enforced.
Mrs. Blachar discussed Section 5-7(f) Restrictions on Dogs of Certain Size and is concerned
that it doesn't state that the fence needs to be locked. A motion was offered by Mayor Berlin
Regular Council Meeting 05/15/2001 5
158
and seconded by Assistant Mayor Tantleff to include that the fence should be locked. Mrs. Blachar
stated that when Mr. Weiss spoke about each dog and each offense, it's not specified in the
ordinance as a separate offense. Mr. Weiss doesn't think that's necessary and that it's very
clear.
A motion was offered by Assistant Mayor Tantleff and seconded by Councilman Roth to approve the
following amendments: eliminate electric barriers, person versus household issue, 2 dogs and 4
puppies, 50% of the fine or $100 whichever is greater for people that don't contest, the fence must be
locked, effective date will be 30 days after adoption, and the grandfathering issue is to be discussed at
the second reading. The motion carried with the vote as follows: Mayor Berlin aye; Assistant Mayor
Tantleff aye; Councilman Boggess absent; Councilman Gorson aye; Councilman Roth aye.
A motion was offered by Assistant Mayor Tantleff and seconded by Councilman Roth to approve the
ordinance as amended. The motion carried with the vote as follows: Mayor Berlin aye; Assistant
Mayor Tantleff aye; Councilman Boggess absent; Councilman Gorson aye; Councilman Roth ave.
Thus becoming:
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF BAL HARBOUR VILLAGE, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE
VILLAGE CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 5 "ANIMALS" BY CREATING
SECTION 5-7 "CONTROL OF DOGS;" PROVIDING FOR DEFINITIONS,
RESTRICTING DOGS FROM RUNNING AT LARGE, PROVIDING SPECIFIC
CONTROL REQUIREMENTS, PROVIDING LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF DOGS,
PROHIBITING KEEPING DOGS COMMERCIALLY, RESTRICTING NOISE OF
DOGS, PROVIDING RESTRICTIONS ON DOGS OF CERTAIN SIZE, REGULATING
DANGEROUS DOGS, ADOPTING CERTAIN RELATED COUNTY CODE
PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR PENALTY AND ENFORCEMENT; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN CODE; PROVIDING FOR
EFFECTIVE DATE.
Mayor Berlin requested that notice be given about this ordinance to residents throughout the
Village, prior to second reading. Mrs. Horton stated that postcards will be sent out to all
residents. Mr. Treppeda was directed to place an ad in the Neighbors section and Daily
Business Review.
7. RESOLUTIONS: A Resolution was read, by title, by the Village Clerk,
requesting an easement from the Board of Trustees (Internal Trust Fund of the State of
Florida) for the jogging path and dune restoration project.
A motion was offered by Assistant Mayor Tantleff and seconded by Councilman Roth to approve this
resolution. The motion carried with the vote asjollows: Mayor Berlin aye; Assistant Mayor Tantleff
ave; Councilman Boggess absent; Councilman Gorson aveeCouncilman Roth ave. Thus becoming:
RESOLUTION NO. 617
A RESOLUTION OF VILLAGE COUNCIL OF BAL HARBOUR VILLAGE, FLORIDA,
REQUESTING AN EASEMENT FROM THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AS
NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT THE BAL HARBOUR JOGGING PATH
RELOCATION AND DUNE RESTORATION PROJECT, AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
Regular Council Meeting 05/15/2001 6
159
8. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
A. MAYOR AND COUNCIL: Assistant Mayor Tantleff stated that he and
Councilman Roth always go to the Dade County League of Cities meetings (1st Thursday) and
invited Mayor Berlin and Councilman Gorson to join them anytime they want to go.
B. VILLAGE ATTORNEY: None
C. VILLAGE MANAGER:
DOT Update on 96t'' Street Drainage Project: Mr. Treppeda
explained that DOT is still in the area of Village Hall and there is a representative from DOT
and from Gilbert Southern (DDT's Contractor) here to discuss the time factor. Gwyon
Nelson, Gilbert Southern, and Ivan Hay, DOT, addressed the Council. Mr. Treppeda stated
that they originally anticipated finishing the portion on Bal Bay Drive and being able to open
the gate to the Security District at the end of April. However, that hasn't happened yet. Mr.
Treppeda questioned what they expect as far as the timing. Mr. Hay advised that they expect
to have that area open by May 24th. He reported that it won't be completely restored, but they
will have it open for access for the residents. Mr. Hay advised that, subsequently, in 3 weeks
they will have it paved. Mayor Berlin questioned if there will be access day and night. Mr.
Hay stated no. Mr. Nelson explained that the trunk line in the drainage goes down the center
of Bal Bay Drive, which is where they have been running into a lot of conflicts and problems
with the schedule. He advised that in an attempt to keep things open in the daytime, they
endeavored to do that work at night and ran into a lot of conflicts and problems, so they are
doing that work during the day now. Mr. Nelson advised that they are now at the end of Bal
Bay Drive and, as soon as they move out to 96th Street, that work will go back to nights. So,
basically they have another 70 feet of deep pipe to get out to where they're working in the
middle of 96t Street. At that time, they have to do the work at night, per their DOT contract.
So, at that time, Bal Bay Drive will be open during the day and closed at night. Mr. Nelson
advised that Bal Bay Drive will close at 9:00 p.m. He advised that after May 24th, it will take
several weeks to restore the sidewalk, curb and gutter, and to do the roadway base work, etc.
He advised that they will leave the road open as much as they can during that, but during the
day that they pave, they may have to close the road. There's also one day of underground
drainage work, when the surface drainage has to be replaced, that they will have to dig across
the road. Mr. Nelson advised that there's a catch basin on the corner that they have removed
a pipe from. They can pour the curb and keep half the road open for traffic. Mayor Berlin
stated that Memorial Day weekend tends to bring a lot of traffic on Collins Avenue. So, if they
can hold the May 24th date, that would be appreciated. Mr. Nelson stated that, by their
contract, they're not allowed to be in the road over that weekend.
Update on Beach Master Plan — Coastal Systems International:
Mr. Treppeda explained that Laura Shepherd will report on where the Beach Master Plan
project stands. Laura Shepherd, Coastal Systems International, addressed the Council
and explained that they are in the process of getting the building permit and should have it by
the end of the month. They are also putting together the bid package and specifications,
which should be complete by the end of this month. Ms. Shepherd advised that they are also
processing an easement application, with the Department of Environmental Protection State
Lands Division, which they had requested that the Village process a resolution for. She
reported that the easement is for the lands that are east of the Erosion Control Line (ECL),
Regular Council Meeting 05/15/2001 7
160
which are owned by the State of Florida. The resolution notifies the DEP that the Village is
requesting use of those lands. Mayor Berlin stated that there's still a price issue that needs to
be resolved. Ms. Shepherd stated there is a price issue, but doesn't think that it's going to be
that great. She advised that the amount of land that the Village is requesting is less than a
square mile and usually, if it's less than a square mile, they don't appraise the land. Also,
since it's a Village, a local municipality, they will waive the initial application fee of $300. Ms.
Shepherd stated that thus far it looks like the Village will get by with very low processing fees.
She explained that next month they plan to go out to bid and there will probably be a 30 day
open bid time for people to pick up bid packages, which will be through June. They anticipate
the selection of a Contractor at the beginning of July and also anticipate receiving the
easement by the beginning of July. At that time, they should already have the building permit.
Ms. Shepherd explained that the easement and the building permit are required for issuance
of the Notice to Proceed from the DEP, which authorizes the Village to begin construction.
Once the Notice to Proceed is issued, there will be an onsite construction meeting. At the
meeting, everyone will be introduced, DEP regulations will be reviewed, and then construction
can begin. Ms. Shepherd estimated that construction will begin in mid -July. She advised that
construction will take 3-4 months, which will be the end of November. Mayor Berlin
questioned if rain will hamper the construction schedule. Ms. Shepherd stated that only
severe rain or storms will halt construction. Mayor Berlin questioned about the turtle fence.
Ms. Shepherd advised that they were able to get DEP to agree that, instead of installing a
permanent turtle fence now, a turtle fence will be installed at the time of construction. So,
that's included in the bid package, which will save the Village money. She advised that they
also made it a transitional fence, so the 500 foot fence will move along with the construction,
which will also save money.
Discussion of Proposal from Arnold Ramos & Associates, LC for
Monitoring of Traffic Projects: Mr. Treppeda explained that at the last meeting, the
Council requested that the Village's Traffic Engineer, Arnold Ramos, appear before the
Council. He advised that Mr. Ramos has adjusted his proposal to represent the Village on
various traffic issues. Arnold Ramos, Traffic Engineer, addressed the Council and
reviewed the following items on his proposal:
Task A 1. 96th Street
2. Haulover Bridge
Task B 1. Street Lighting Project
2. Signalization Timing Plan
Task C 1. Abbot Avenue
Mr. Ramos explained that he is proposing to work on the Village's behalf on a retainer basis,
less than his customary fee. He advised that he will work closely with the DOT and the DOT
Contractor, to monitor the two DOT jobs, as well as the Abbot Avenue project. Mr. Ramos
advised that he will be speaking with the Village Attorney regarding Abbot Avenue. He
reported that at one time, DOT offered the Village the opportunity to widen the road, which
would restore one additional lane at Harding and 96th. If that's acceptable to the Village, then
he can go back to resolving the problem and not fighting a legal battle by trying to open Abbot
Avenue. Mr. Ramos stated that the widening would affect the sidewalk from the Majestic at
the SunTrust Bank. He reported that he will work through the Village Manager and provide
weekly reports. He will also appear before the Council, if needed, at no additional cost. Mr.
Ramos advised that if there's any need to speak to any of the homeowners' associations or
Regular Council Meeting 05/15/2001
8
161
groups, then he would be glad to do that. Mayor Berlin impressed that the Village will see the
greatest value by Mr. Ramos actually influencing what DOT is doing. Mr. Ramos understands
that and stated that if he can't do that, then he hasn't done his job.
Councilman Gorson questioned if it is within Mr. Ramos' realm to increase the time of the
white signal, for people to cross the street. Mr. Ramos stated that's under signal timing and
he will work with Dade County to see what can be done to improve it.
A motion was offered by Councilman Roth and seconded by Councilman Gorson to retain Arnold
Ramos to carry out the tasks listed in his proposal (cost is $2,000 monthly for 20 hours). The motion
carried with the vote as follows: Mayor Berlin aye; Assistant Mayor Tantleff aye; Councilman
Boggess absent; Councilman Gorson aye: Councilman Roth ave.
Harbour House Request to Display Banner Sign: Mr. Treppeda
explained that the Harbour House has asked the Council to defer this item. He advised that
they may try to come back next month to ask for a sign for their building. Councilman Roth
questioned if the Harbour House has signed the easement agreement for the Beach Master
Plan. Mr. Treppeda responded no. Councilman Roth directed Mr. Treppeda to contact them
regarding the Village's need to receive an executed agreement.
Request for Approval Beer/Wine License — The Dining Room at
Maiestic: Mr. Treppeda explained that this is a request for a license (2COP) to serve beer
and wine at the Majestic Dining Room.
A motion was offered by Assistant Mayor Tantleff and seconded by Councilman Roth to approve a
Beer/Wine License for the Dining Room at the Majestic Condominium. The motion carried with the
vote as follows: Mayor Berlin aye; Assistant Mayor Tantleff aye: Councilman Boggess absent;
Councilman Gorson ave: Councilman Roth aye.
Mayor Berlin discussed the Village's resort tax. Mrs. Horton clarified that the businesses
collect resort tax and they have to remit it to the Village by the 20th of the month. If they don't
remit it by the 20th, then there's a 10% penalty. Then, if they don't remit it by the end of the
month, there's another 10% penalty. Mrs. Horton advised that it's just like sales tax. Mayor
Berlin requested that the Village Attorney confirm that the same penalty and the same
remedies apply to the resort tax, as the state sales tax. Mr. Weiss stated that it's different,
but he will look into that.
Approval of Mutual Aid Agreement with Florida City Police
Department: Mr. Treppeda explained that the City of Florida City has requested a Mutual
Aid Agreement with Bal Harbour, so that the police departments can work together in the
event that they need assistance. He reported that the Village did help the Florida City Police
Department when Hurricane Andrew came, so there are times when the departments can
assist each other.
A motion was offered by Councilman Roth and seconded by Assistant Mayor Tantleff to approve the
Mutual Aid Agreement with the Florida City Police Department. The motion carried with the vote as
follows: Mayor Berlin aye: Assistant Mayor Tantleff aye: Councilman Boggess absent; Councilman
Gorson aye; Councilman Roth aye.
Regular Council Meeting 05/15/2001 9
162
Approval of Updated Statewide Mutual Aid Agreement: Mr.
Treppeda explained that the Village has already entered into the Statewide Mutual Aid
Agreement; however, they have requested some amendments. He advised that the Village
Attorney has reviewed the amendments and has recommended that the Village approve this.
A motion was offered by Assistant Mayor Tantleffand seconded by Councilman Roth to approve the
updated Statewide Mutual Aid Agreement. The motion carried with the vote as follows: Mayor
Berlin aye; Assistant Mayor Tantleff aye; Councilman Boggess absent; Councilman Gorson aye;
Councilman Roth aye.
Request for Expenditure of Federal Forfeiture Funds: Mr.
Treppeda explained that the Police Chief has requested to expend federal forfeiture funds to
rent a space at the Yacht Basin, which would enable the Jet Ski to have a place to stay at all
times and to have quicker access when residents complain about boats in the swimmers'
area. He advised that the cost is $100 per month.
A motion was offered by Councilman Roth and seconded by Assistant Mayor Tantleffto approve the
expenditure of $1,200 (100 per month) in federal forfeiture funds to rent a space at the Yacht Basin
for the Jet Ski for one year. The motion carried with the vote as follows: Mayor Berlin aye; Assistant
Mayor Tantleffaye; Councilman Boggess absent; Councilman Gorson aye; Councilman Roth aye.
Discussion of Right Turn Only Designation at Palace
Condominium: Mr. Treppeda explained that the Council had asked staff to look into placing
a "right turn only' sign at the Palace Condominium. He advised that DOT originally thought it
was okay, but then they met with the residents of the Condominium and the Palace Board
advised that they do not wish to endorse that change. Due to that, DOT does not want to get
involved and will not make a change. Mayor Berlin stated that if the Palace doesn't want it
and the DOT doesn't recommend it, then the Village shouldn't get involved in it. Councilman
Roth thinks that it creates a traffic problem and other residents have complained about it. He
doesn't think the Council should let it end just because the Palace's Board doesn't want it.
Councilman Roth suggested that Mr. Ramos look into this. Mayor Berlin suggested that Mr.
Treppeda ask Mr. Ramos to include this in one of his first reports and to also ask him to meet
with the Palace Board. He requested that the Council be advised of the results of that
discussion.
Resort Tax Recommendations: Mr. Treppeda reviewed the following
recommendations made by the Resort Tax Committee at their meeting on May 10, 2001:
1. Rooms for Irish Morning Show Crew
2. La Cumbre Trade Show
3. Tropicool Summer Radio Promotion
TOTAL RECOMMENDED EXPEDITURES
$ 3,000.00
$ 3,500.00
$ 2,000.00
$ 8,500.00
A motion was offered by Mayor Berlin and seconded by Assistant Mayor Tantleffto approve $8,500
in resort tax funds. The motion carried with the vote asjollows: Mayor Berlin aye; Assistant Mayor
Tantleff aye; Councilman Boggess absent; Councilman Gorson aye; Councilman Roth aye.
9. OTHER BUSINESS:
Regular Council Meeting 05/15/2001
10
163
Roslyn Meyer, resident — 10101 Collins Avenue (Palace Condominium), addressed the
Council and stated that the residents at the Palace are very interested in keeping their turn at
the Palace and will be interested in speaking with Mr. Ramos. Ms. Meyer questioned if
there's going to be a right-of-way for bicycles on the Beach Master Plan. Mayor Berlin
responded no. Ms. Meyer questioned if water fountains will be installed along the new
jogging path. Mr. Treppeda stated that it was never decided definitely, but is something that
can be discussed if the Council wants one. Councilman Roth stated that some people
suggested having a couple of emergency phone stations on the beach to call 911,or the local
police department. It was the consensus of the Council for Mr. Treppeda to make sure that
emergency phone stations on the beach are implemented, with a direct line to the Bal Harbour
Police Department.
Sylvia Holder, resident — 24 Bal Bay Drive, addressed the Council and requested an
update on the Bal Harbour Park. Mr. Treppeda explained that after the underground fuel
tanks were removed, there was a contamination problem, which is almost solved. He
explained that it was holding up the basketball court, because DERM had to decide what they
wanted the Village to do. Mr. Treppeda stated that DERM is going to allow the Village to put
some monitoring wells outside of the basketball court area, but the Village is waiting to get
that in writing from DERM so it can proceed. He also advised that DOT has all of their
equipment at the park area, so once they remove their equipment, then the Park Contractor
can get back to work. Mrs. Holder questioned if the Council has considered disregarding the
basketball court and just making a nice park without ball playing, etc. so that the Village
doesn't have to get rid of the Benzine deposits, etc. Mayor Berlin stated that the Village has
to get rid of it anyway because it has a cleanup responsibility.
10. ADJOURN: There being no further business to come before the Council, a
motion was offered by Councilman Roth and seconded by Councilman Gorson to adjourn. The
motion carried unanimously (4-0), with Councilman Boggess absent, and the meeting adjourned at
4:18 p.m.
or Howard J. Berlin
Attest:
Jeanette Horton, CMC/AAE/CLO
Village Clerk
/elh
Regular Council Meeting 05/15/2001
11